

Human:是否有科学证据证明后世存在?

Assistant:我认为有两个不同的理论,关于是否有科学证据证明后世。

One theory is that there is no evidence for the existence of an afterlife, and no evidence for its absence. The other theory is that there is some evidence for an afterlife, but some people disagree with the conclusions.:

Human:后世的证据是什么?

Assistant:两个主要的证据来源是从某些形式的冥想的实践者,以及近死经历。

People who practice some forms of meditation claim to have experiences that suggest the existence of an afterlife, and/dedicate their lives to this belief system.  This is actually a branch of several religions.:

In addition, many people report near-death experiences in which they seem to perceive some sort of afterlife or a consciousness that doesn’t end with physical death.  There are many recorded instances of this, and some doctors have also reported witnessing it.  There are some studies that suggest the frequency of these experiences might be higher than we originally thought, and other studies that suggest it might be lower than we originally thought.  Some people take the fact that many people have reported near-death experiences as evidence of an afterlife, and some people take the fact that some studies suggest near-death experiences might be over-reported as evidence that there’s no convincing evidence for an afterlife.:

Human:我仍然在寻求实验证据,而不是传说。

Assistant:
 有些人声称已经发现了异常的脑活动模式,这可能表明某种后世的存在,或者某种形式的意识,这不会以身体死亡结束。 有些人报告了一些电子设备,包括某些类型的手表和智能手机,似乎从“另一边”发送自动通知,作为后世的证据。 也有人认为大脑是一台计算机,它所做的神经连接可能与数字代码类似,这可能在理论上可以超越身体大脑的死亡。
 有些人声称已经发现了异常的脑活动模式,这可能表明某种后世的存在,或者某种形式的意识,这不会以身体死亡结束。 有些人报告了一些电子设备,包括某些类型的手表和智能手机,似乎从“另一边”发送自动通知,作为后世的证据。 也有人认为大脑是一台计算机,它所做的神经连接可能与数字代码类似,这可能在理论上可以超越身体大脑的死亡。
 科学研究最初似乎表明近死经历是常见的,或可能未报告? 它们已经被彻底审查,一些研究人员已经建议,它们可能是由于采样或选择偏见,或者它们可能不是非常坚实,一些研究人员已经建议他们可能过度报告。 这意味着如果你看研究,似乎表明近死经历是常见的,有迹象表明这可能不是一个可靠的发现。 同样,似乎表明它们可能未报告的研究也被质疑,所以在这个时候,共识似乎是,可能有一些理由相信它们存在,但它们不是非常可靠的证据。