(1) The premise is that the quotes in question are irrelevant because the OT Scriptures are argued as irrelevant. It does not take advantage of any of the scholarship that has been done to contextualize the quotes and show that they do not, in fact, condemn homosexuals as God created them — these quotes do have a specific context and it is not homosexuality. (I believe one has to do with temple prostitutes and I can’t recall about the other.)