While I see what point you are trying to make, I am afraid that you are attempting to utilize circular logic. While it is pointed out that all of the law is restated in the two Great Commandments, you state that not following a previous commandment that was restated is breaking the Great Commandments. To clarify, it is stated in the two great commandments that the DEFINITION OF SIN is when you DO NOT LOVE someone. However, you are stating that in order to love God (In other words, the definition of love), you must not sin. See how this is circular logic? When Term A (sin) is defined as Term B (hate), you are trying to say that at the same time, Term B (hate) is defined as Term A (sin). While I agree that avoiding sin is definitely loving, that is because avoiding sin is THE RESULT of loving, not the DEFINITION of loving, since committing sin is THE RESULT of not loving. It’s a bit confusing, but hopefully someone can explain it a bit better. While I understand what you are trying to say in stating that we need to keep God’s Commandments, it doesn’t work AGAINST the Great Commandments, it works IN CONJUNCTION with them, because they sum up what God’s Commandments are.