In a systematic review and meta-analysis, Ho and colleagues (2020) examined the effectiveness of extracorporeal magnetic stimulation for treatment of SUI. Data sources included 4 electronic databases from inception to May 18, 2019. Two authors independently carried out the search, evaluated the methodological quality, and extracted data. The final studies included in the analysis were selected after reaching consensus with the 3rd author. A total of 20 studies were included in the systematic review and 12 of these in the meta-analysis. Quality assessment indicated that only 8 of 17 RCTs had low risk in overall risk of bias, whereas all controlled trials had serious risk of bias. The weighted mean effect size of magnetic stimulation on QoL, number of leakages, pad test outcomes, and number of incontinence events was 1.045 (95 % CI: 0.409 to 1.681), -0.411 (95 % CI: 0.178 to 0.643), -0.290 (95 % CI: 0.025 to 0.556), and -0.747 (95 % CI: -1.122 to -0.372), respectively. Subgroup analysis revealed a significant difference in the type of QoL measurement used. Sensitivity analyses revealed that a high degree of heterogeneity persisted even after omitting studies individually. The authors concluded that extracorporeal magnetic stimulation may be effective in treating UI and improving QoL without major safety concerns; however, because of a high degree of heterogeneity among studies, inferences from the results must be made with caution. These investigators encouraged researchers to conduct further qualitative and quantitative studies to develop consistent content and dosage for the intervention.