also, the attorney for the state or the county. so that's really not an objection. secondly, if you look at committee summary on the bill, which you probably have never gotten there yet. you'll say that the challenging wrongful expenditures has been a while for a long time and yet we don't have a lot of frivolous cases challenging expenditures you know from your discussions of that policy that PAC sexpenditures are really just appropriations by another night so the same policy that applies to expenditures should apply to tax policy as well. the difference is just that in the current wall if taxpayer,once the challenge of a application or methods are a means of collective attacks is unconstitutional that they have to first, while a contested case with the office of administrative hearings. after losing that that I have to sit even know where to start with, that the opposite. Ms. Wright of earrings has no jurisdiction to answer that this bill is about transparency of government saving the taxpayers money and putting the taxpayer on the same footing as the government procedurally don't never be on the same footing with the government monetarily they can afford it. what at least they will get a turn at bat. residents are mortally [SPEAKER CHANGES] You’re your purpose riveted by the second time we don't recognize the right motion. a second mystery Krauser, [SPEAKER CHANGES] thinking there was a physical measurement of potential cost of the same three hundred thousand dollars. remember correctly, but this would potentially reduce the revenue. this is obviously a and interesting alignment assessments by size of him just wants further discussion of finance, but not this evening on this for faculty recognized for motion in my state 's motion with the previous question installation and the previous question have been moved by Rome in house Betty's eyes and gentlemen. they have a rule, we'll think about it on emotion and then they notice you are on the dissenting or opposing sides said the chairman Roland Abbey represented Howard and reps understand will be recognized for a period not to exceed three minutes after the vote of the previous question, and before the vote on the motion so the emotion is called previous question, all is available at all opposed another part what about All in favor vote aye. All opposed vote no. The clerk will open the vote. The clerk will let the machine record the vote heart-lung machine report about a gate having the firm at twenty five. the negative emotion passes were now back on the bill, Representative Paul if the eight actually by rule, a. this would normally involve you having an opportunity to speak for three minutes, but the gentleman as the positions of the first time to someone else in the chamber and gentleman is recognized that Dorothy was the newsletter of the department sent to represent a more are you and so we will begin with representatives and the chairs and [SPEAKER CHANGES] other representatives. Amara been a Blackwell would like to be prepared not to exceed three minutes. at its again license and was on the motion to re verb our house Bill five four fifty seven to the committee on finance. the members of health. you may have a chance in the next three minutes to look at the physical languages on your computer and you will see if you have that opportunity just like telling you that it doesn't raise the tax doesn't raise the assessment or the then reduced revenues. what it does is create an opportunity to save money by doing one of the things challenging the application of a local government that is violating your statutes and spending money wrongfully that a good thing that