All this aside, I don’t care if one sees Kettlewell as fully vindicated. It is and was obvious that there were weaknesses in, “mistakes” if you will. All noted by his peers, thus the motivation of Majerus. Incomplete and incorrect conclusions contained that remained “in the vest” by Kettlewells’ fellow scientists. My objection, in response, once again, to the objection that aig were using artistic license, even though they were fully upfront that they were doing so. My response was that science and scientists do the same thing all the time, the difference being it is rarely acknowledged unless after the fact. Hey, if everyone wants to do it, fine. Just be honest about. “Full disclosure, so to speak”.