I don’t want you to take this wrong David, but i’m getting a little frustrated with these type of claims. Now i’m not saying that you aren’t telling the truth. In truth, of all the claims i’ve read here yours would be the one i would most likely believe. But after realthog tells he/she has written over seventy books (still hasn’t named one for me) and christine’s sudden revelation that she is revising/editing a science textbook, I’m starting to get a little jaded. But let’s assume, as i will, that what you say is true. While important, i guess, to you, it doesn’t really mean anything to me. What i believe is not taken from aig literature at all, not a single word of it. So I’m still not sure we are talking about the same thing. Nonetheless, it appears you came from creationism (I can’t see why else you would be writing their materials) to evolution, while the process was reversed for me. I am not, however, some supposed bestselling author (70 books? Really? J.K Rowling and Stephen King would be envious), nor am i editing any science textbooks. It appears that for some here a rebuttal is something you pull out of your rear end when you run out of everything else. I don’t even want to dialogue with people who make stuff up. Just don’t tell me next week you were head of the human genome project. Lol. Hopefully you can empathize with my distrust. Best wishes.