In your booklet to page 267 as Miss Jones mentioned, there’s one provision in central management that I’d like to discuss. On page 267, this is your competitive grants provision and this provision follows the money. Just to mention, on page 268, if you’ll recall in the Senate provision under subsection 8 you made a direct appropriation for the 2014-15 fiscal year to big brothers big sisters of the triangle with the intent that going forward they participate in the competitive grants process so that’s that stark difference that you see on page 268 and then if you’ll turn with me to page 269, you see also on page 270 – the House did not elect to give that direct allocation to big brothers big sisters nor put them directly into the competitive grants process. What they did do is on page 270 line 5, you’ll see a new sub-subdivision and they created a new initiative for comprehensive smoking prevention and cessation program for pregnant women and postpartum mothers. Now, if you’ll turn with me to the division of child development and early education that begins on page 279. This is your childcare subsidy rates, revised co-payments and eligibility criteria provision and this provision follows the money. The biggest differences between the House and Senate versions, if you look under 12(b).3 subsections A and B, you’ll notice date differences. The House moved it to October 1, 2014 and that basically is to align with the market rates provision which we’ll talk about a little bit later. Also, if you look on page 280, there’s a new subsection, A1 and this is language that’s House-only that the House added regarding allowing for a transition period. Regarding the eligibility changes, the Senate elected to make those changes effective immediately, of course beginning on the September 1 date. What the House decided to do was to create a transition period. So, if you’ll look under section A1 it allows for child who’s currently on the income eligibility based on 75% of the state median income, to remain there until their next re-determination and on that date, they will then become a part of the new eligibility income criteria under subsection A of this section. So that’s the change on page 280. Moving on to page 281, this is the smart start tentative maintenance of effort requirement and if you look on page 282, the difference here – the House added a new subsection A and this basically requires NCPC to hire three staff to assist local partnerships with fund raising and grant writing. The remainder of the provision is identical. Moving on to page 283, this is study childcare subsidy for 11 and 12 year olds and if you look on page 284, the difference here is that last line is underlined on 9/11. What the House did was to make it clear that the findings and recommendations are to be separate for each age group. Moving on to page 285, provides childcare allocation formula. If you look at the bottom of subsection B on page 285, this was Senate-only language and what the senate did was require that any reallocated funding in fiscal year 2013-14 become part of a County’s allocation in future fiscal years and beginning with fiscal year 2014-15, the revised formula would apply to both increased and decreased allocations. So that was the language in the Senate version. If we move on to page 286, you’ll see.