The internal, remote evaluation conducted in October 2020 and scored the programme according to the Development Assistance Committee (DAC) criteria as outlined below where: 4 = outstanding performance (above expectations), 3 = performance in line with what would be expected of a well-functioning organisation, 2 = generally acceptable performance but with some clear, and documented, shortcomings, 1 = barely acceptable performance with some major shortcomings and reservations, 0 = totally unacceptable performance or insufficient data to make an assessment.