oh, people are happy to live in Raleigh and be able to go out to dinner without fearing that there is getting the accidental discharge or call the on-call room brawl. people are happy on our green ways,they don't want to have to worry about irate fans in stadiums and our colleges and universities have said resoundingly no thank you. we've heard it from the Chancellor of every public university. we've heard it from the independent colleges. people don't want things representative Lipke told you: they don't want. why are you giving people something that they emphatically do not want and it will subject them to acts of violence in places where they already feel safe. this is not something that makes this state a better place. it's something that puts us on Stephen Colbert and we've been on cold there a little bit too much lately. please vote against this bill presented in as good a place that your purpose debate the bill is recognized and ready to go. thank you, Mister Speaker, I cannot let each other the house that we currently have a statute about storage of firearms to protect minors. it reads any person with the first. sorry person who resides in the same premises of the minor owns or possesses a firearm and start early in the firearm, a condition that the firearm can be discharged in a manner that the person knew or should have known supervise minor would be able to gain access to the firearm. we had that provision because we understand that might or should not have access to a firearm in a person who has the firearm have the responsibility to make sure the minor can't get over there are lots of other people to do that we think should not have a firearm, a person is a fugitive from justice by justice one who's been adjudicated mentally incompetent. one is an alien or illegally in the United States. someone is every renounce their United States patients. yet, the list goes on. but because you were unwilling to hear an amendment because it is not. it is not illegal for a person who has a gun to bring and keep these people who work should not have it from gaining of as a reason why we shouldn't have an honest, open debate about issues and eight. it is very objectionable that the debate would be cut off like that when this is a question important bill. we should not I can understand why anybody would want him gone accessible on a college campus when there are hundreds of people around. I suppose that you think someone could run to a car after a shooting stars run to the car and get a guy as many people would probably do you do that with a dozen people and go in with guns who were they shooting it doesn't make any sense at all to Hennepin and find on a college campus committees, colleges have elementary schools and middle schools associated with them. your opening this up not just to college campuses that the students who are younger than that to really an unsound unwise guilt down to Bill and I hope that you will stop and think through it again before you know presented in an procedure purpose of the junta 's rigorous oregano. they mistake of since then, [SPEAKER CHANGES] the present Jack's concern, [SPEAKER CHANGES] I believe we already have provisions in your layout to be drinking alcohol during web as we concealed your permit and to allow someone with superior dramatic unit weapon into a disaster serves alcohol does still not allow that person to the consuming alcohol. so that's not make that person a more dangerous. the idea about the weapons on campus. personally I feel that the new something was saying it again locked up in the car on campus. some I might break in a stale and I would say best way to do that is loudly cheered in the classroom and now then you have one test unit out a car, but I do agree with Rosetta Berlin don't at least be able to have a player Jason need to defend themselves