House bill nine fifteen an act to amend the laws governing credit unions, Johnson of North Carolina next president of Howard PlayStation purpose license. subject to the calendar. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Mister Speaker, the light is recognized the state of motion mistake. I would make is that House Bill four five seven is sent to the committee on finance that at the center purpose I would object and would like to be heard on that they the gentleman that the chair was asking for objection. the gentleman stated objection. the gentleman may state the purpose for his injection. [SPEAKER CHANGES] the speaker of rule thirty eight D talks about when to go to finance this bill does not of the following that doesn't raise revenue, reduced revenue levy a tax authorize levy the tax assessed Murphy authorize the issue upon for that. it's civil procedure bill, rep. if hours post of the bill, said Blackwell is the lead sponsor of it passed. I believe unanimously from judiciary and a week or two ago. it's ready to go draw is an empowered researcher purpose, and this figure on a set here every night on talking back and forth to our fiscal staff, and I just got an e-mail from those states that have described the building.their message back to me is that, yes, the buildings that have given funny. that's the reason for the young motion [SPEAKER CHANGES] presented Blackwell, please take your purpose speak on the motion to generate an estimate motion one X version. it stands comments the bill has received reviews Judiciary Committee. there's nothing in the bill that raises taxes or fees that would otherwise require it to get a finance think this is an effort to kill the bill by send it to representative Howard's own committee and I would urge the body not to agree to the motion at Ross. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Ross procedure purpose to speak on emotion and sentiment immersion. [SPEAKER CHANGES] thank you, Mister Speaker, ladies and gentlemen, I just wanted to say for the record that the bill did not get unanimous support in the Judiciary a committee that there were questions that were raised about the Bell and what implications it might have, not just for the treasury, but also for the court system.given that it would open up on utility is sued to a whole bunch of different people and on in ways that they've never been able to do before without any penalty for frivolous lawsuits, and his body has been putting lots of penalties on frivolous lawsuits on the past few years, but this would certainly invite many of them, and I think Representative Howard and staff on our appropriate and having it take a dip in finance presented similar procedure purpose of a fashion don't recognize the great emotion, [SPEAKER CHANGES] Mister Speaker just said that I agree with the with the representative power to motion in thiscase, our reference to review enjoy reading the rules. page one forty three and I would cite rule thirty eight the end of insight that the world. it is as if it in any manner raises or reduces revenue. this could potentially reduce revenue with respect to the standing issue could affect taxes have a rep from solid concur that the does out of abundance of caution, the bill should go back to finance him allowed to come out of appropriations, but that would sincerely answer is not actually had about in appropriations so have a policy meeting would have a potential impact on the tax out of the abundance of caution, where's the body 's vote in favor the motion presented Stampley state your purpose. the second on the record as a great motion. second down, but they can also not quite sure how the members of will understand that under understanding underlying bill, but the apparent argument is that will have all these frivolous taxpayers doing these groundless suits costing us money, but we have two provisions in our wall today. rule eleven and general statute six– twenty one. five, which means that if a taxpayer filed a frivolous or non justiciable action. the taxpayer gets to pay not only good for her