good advice, if you had followed. And may I remind you that answering questions with lots of verbiage containing no facts or proofs does not constitue a question answered. And all you psychoanalyzing aside (just another attempt to pretend you are answering someing), if you had read to the beginning you would know my response was to initial posters obsession with artwork and consistency when said party clearly stated they would be using these methods. My reaction was to test posters reaction to instances where science had used “artistic license” (I am being kind here), incorrect information, even fraud and hoaxes in their textbooks, et.al. I merely wanted to see if the outrage was commensurate with the crime.