Quickly. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Remind me in terms of where we stand now in terms of the continuation of benefits during the bills period. I know there have been discussion of payments not continuing during the bills period but historically payments had continued. Where do we stand today? [SPEAKER CHANGES] Mr. Chair, Jennifer Hillman, research division. This does not change the maintenance of service that applies to recipients and it does not change continuation of benefits which applies to enrollees of LME NCOs. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Thank you. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Senator Robinson, I believe you had a question. Please bear in mind our time. [SPEAKER CHANGES] I will. Just a couple, Mr. Chair. Thank you, and I’ll try not to repeat anything. I want to get back real quick to the summer feeding program. Does that program preclude… I mean does the provision that’s been written in preclude schools from contracting with other churches or community-based organizations to provide those services? [SPEAKER CHANGES] Denise Thomas, fiscal research. Senator Robinson, it does not. They would still be open to other sponsors. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Just one or two other quick ones, Mr. Chair. [SPEAKER CHANGES] One please, ma’am. [SPEAKER CHANGES] We should have cut Senator McKissick off earlier then. In terms of the PCS, and I’m trying to refer to the page… personal care services, with the changes recommended by the House, is that at the reduced rate or does it impact he personal care services reimbursement rate? Home cares went from 15 to 14 to 13, or am I on the wrong thing? You know what I’m talking about, Steve? [SPEAKER CHANGES] Steve Owen, fiscal research. The Senate budget calls for an additional rate reduction. Currently the rate that’s approved by CMS is 13 dollar and 88 cents per hour, so under the Senate version, that would be reduced even further to compensate for the additional 50 hours. Under the House version, the 13.88 stays intact, but there is the study to actually look at a brand new PCS program altogether. [SPEAKER CHANGES] I’m sorry Senator Robinson; I must end your questioning now. Senator Van Duyn, I believe I saw you had a question. You can bat cleanup for us. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Yes, I have a question about CCNC, pages 360 to 362. My local CCNC, CCWNC, maintains that they’ve saved significant Medicaid dollars. Am I understanding that this zeros our funding out in the Senate version? [SPEAKER CHANGES] There’s not a zeroing out of the per member per month payments. Last year’s budget required the payments to be made by CCNC. I believe the policy argument was that there was a disconnect between the department which was making the payments and CCNC, which was trying to get doctors to participate meaningfully in the programs, and so the reasoning, as discussed, was that the money would go from the department to CCNC and then they would pay the per member per month, and it would be paid on a tiered basis on the basis of the doctor’s participation in the CCNC initiatives. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Thanks everyone for your attention. Session begins at 3 o’clock and I appreciate all of the good questions, good answers, and thank you audience for being here. We are now adjourned.