as to the first part of your reply, my point was to contrast the tendency, in this case of evolutionists, to look past, quickly declare irrelevant, or ignore or not respond to instances of error in scientific thought or practice while gang tackling any party with whom they disagree, in this case, creationists. My point was not to condemn science, nor to fail to acknowledge that as you say, science searches out error and fraud, and to their credit, identify and eliminate. While this is true, one would have a false impression were one to assume (as many of the innocent do) that this identification and elimination always takes place quickly and “openly”, such as caveats in textbooks. You may not see the need for this, and i don’t particularly care because i take the time to read many and various viewpoints, during which these instances tend to be made public.