I turn to your writings much often than I objectively have the time to spare. Your blog is a part of my mental hygiene and I would value it certainly even if you had not disclosed yourself as an Orthodox Christian or reveled yourself to be an atheist or adherent to a different religion. But the fact that you chose to share that you are an Orthodox Christian influenced my perception. My reason is not disconnected with my heart and the fact that (I thought) we drink from the same cup had a meaning for me. For instance, I always felt uneasy when someone from those who refuse the Council of Chalcedon represents him or herself simply as Orthodox Christian to me, while knowing that I identify as such but accept all seven ecumenical councils. No one has the right to decide for the other what is the “real deal” and obviously Orthodox Christian is not a brand name to be protected as such or a property of an organization, but if we think that there is a good chance we are not in unity as are joined name would suggest, we should be careful not to mislead one another. I thought of you as belonging to ROC (MP), since you disclosed you are Russian and Orthodox. This series implies otherwise (but would you agree that that was a honest mistake?). You say legitimacy of MP is non existent, what about the holy sacraments in ROC, people baptized in the meantime in Russia are not actually so? Is this a harsh inside critic (and there is a lot of reason for that) or are you really not in communion with so called Eastern Orthodox Churches? What Church do you think than stands in Orthodoxy? Me being from Serbian Orthodox Church, what am I to you, a schismatic? I trust we understand each other, that no name calling is involved, just clarification of state of affairs. I would be deeply grateful for your answer.