That subsection B here was the language from last year’s version of the child care allocation formula. The House did not elect to take the language that’s in the Senate version for subsection B. What it did was create language under subsection C. So if you’re looking beginning on line 28, the biggest difference begins with the subdivision 1 and what subdivision 1 says, it provides that beginning the 2014 15 fiscal year, the department is to use 1/3 implementation of the new census data allocation formula every 2 years. However for the 2014 15 allocations, a county that did not have a subsidy waiting list in the 2013 14 fiscal year does not receive an increase in its allocation based on the new allocation formula. And beginning 2015 2016, a county whose spending coefficient is below 95% in the previous fiscal year does not receive an increase in its allocation in the following fiscal year, meaning 2016 2017. However it does provide for a waiver due to extraordinary circumstances. And it also further provides for a report by the department due on October 1 of each year on the number of counties that were granted the waiver pursuant to that subdivision, sub-subdivision. It goes on to say that under subdivision 2, immediately upon release of new census data, the department shall use 1/3 biannual implementation reflecting a 6 year phase in approach to each census cycle thereafter. So basically the difference in the Senate version is a 2 year phase in, the House version is a 6 year phase in. Moving on to page 288, this is a House only provision. Child care market rate adjustments. And what this does is adjust market rates for 3 to 5 star rated child care centers and homes to 40% of the difference between current market rates and the 2013 market rates. Moving on to page 289, NC pre-K audits. Again this is a House only provision. And it addresses an issue regarding duplicate audits, by requiring local partnerships administering NC pre-K programs to be subject to audits that are already under current law. Page 290. Again, this is a House only provision. Child care license certification by DHHS. This allows the division to assume responsibility for issuing certifications for child care early educators. All right, moving on to the division of social services. On page 291, this provision follows the money and there’s only a slight modification on page 292, line 30, you notice that under subdivision 4 it references any funding needs. And if you’ll turn with me to page 295, line 23, under subdivision 4 the House changed that to reflect adequacy of funding. All right, and now if you’ll turn with me to the very end of the book on page 404, this is your block grants provision. Again this is page 404, toward the back. And I’m going to go ahead and just have you turn to the House version again this follows the money. And the House spent, had some additional funds to spend in ten of contingency funds. If you look at page 405, lines 36 to 39, this shows you where that additional money, those additional funds show up. Plus 12 million. And then if you’ll turn with me over to page 409, there are two differences that I’ll point out here. One with the mental health services block grant. Under item 2, the Senate has, this amount, they mainly had the funds