I understood Joel’s emphasis, though this doesn’t reduce it to little more than nitpicking, seeing what the scientific community has lived with,overlooked, ignored, or pushed out of sight during it’s long and storied history. Science at large, and evolution in particular, operates with paradigms. These tend to, over protracted periods of time, take on a quasi-religious nature, with their own commandments (though shalt not mention ID in a classroom unless with derision, thou shalt not allow for alternate approaches to origins) along with their high priests (Dawkins, Dennett, Harris, et. al.). References to fallacies only reinforce my suspicion that you have not understood my original intent. Perhaps this is my fault.