I certainly applaud your desire for consistency and truth in advertising. Sort of like when Haeckel’s embryo drawings were used for over a hundred years after they were known to be fakes, with never a disclaimer in a textbook. Or perhaps similar to the peppered moth, and experiment never repeated successfully and accomplished with pinning moths to tree trunks where they DO NOT normally stay, with nary a disclaimer in a textbook. Or perhaps more like the drawings of ancient man, those incredibly hairy, slow looking hominids wearing animal skins, all of this based more often than not on a single jawbone or skull cap. Artistic license, perhaps? Or maybe more like the supposed stages of horse evolution, showing the cute little one working it’s way to todays magnificent specimens, which has become embarrassing now that we know all of these “stages” lived contemporary with each other. Or maybe i’m thinking of the vaunted “evolutionary tree”, most of which is an imaginary tree. Do we see disclaimers acknowledging the parts arbitrarily filled in or joined together where there is no fossil proof to substantiate such a move? Or perhaps when we see the “primordial soup” pictures where life first began, even though the earth’s atmosphere and even water itself would have worked against this “miracle” happening. Any paragraphs at the bottom of the page explaining that? And when we are taught that life happened by accident, are we informed that evolutionists themselves admit that the possibility of said event is one chance in ten followed by hundreds or even thousands of zeros? When evolutionists have bought into hoaxes and frauds, did we see any big announcement, newspaper ads, or highlighted acknowledgement in textbooks admitting such errors? And the vaunted fruit fly experiments. Are students informed that after millions of generations, the only thing achieved were deformed fruit flies? And this is how mutation “powers” evolutionary processes? Are they taught with emphasis that virtually all mutations are neutral at best and fatal at worse? And let’s not forget the Cambrian explosion. Are we teaching our students that life, complex and complete, suddenly appears with no apparent ancestors in the fossil record? And when the statement is made that the fossil record supports evolution, are students informed that there are numerous evolutionists who believe no such thing, and that there is no irrefutable missing link found among the 200+ million fossils found so far?