You see, talking science should be preceded by reading and studying science. And ideas and thoughts, proposals and speculations, theories and hypotheses should be judged as to their quality not based on “who” had the idea, or are they proper members of the “priesthood” of church of evolution, but solely on the veracity or truthfulness of what they put forth, judged on their own merits, and not whether the thought police would approve. That’s the science I grew up with and taught for decades. Real science. Free of ad hominem attacks and poisoning the well fear mongering.