So for the last time, everyone get off the list I originally posted. You reacted like I still believe they haven’t been corrected or are still believed by all. The point was that once they were, and that while they were known by some or most scientists to be false, or results falsely obtained. Yet obviously none of you are or were bothered by it. One of you even endorsed such methods. I was just asking how you could be so unaffected by such blatant or obvious deception and error, yet deride AIG for using artistic license even though they stated so up front. Is there a double standard there? If you don’t see one, then I seemed to have wandered off into an amoral multiverse.