It then amazes how after acknowledging such rare traits that you can so easily conclude JC’s unworthiness to lead. Surely for you to downplay such a man; you bring an argument so great that it tips the scales. I do not say that honesty and integrity are the only characteristics required for leading the nation – it would be absurd to say so. However, to brush a man away and question his ability for the role; surely you bring an argument that is more than just your opinion on his ability to lead with your evidence being the outcome of a public referendum. A “public referendum” that the public needed facts and figures on to help decide to vote and not the leader of a political party to convince or canvass. We just wanted the facts out of the government in power for us to decide. We are not so inept to require canvassing or persuasion. The facts – that’s all; via any medium.