well, it’s clear you don’t care if mistakes were made, fraud was done, artitistic license was performed without notice. and you are quite right. science didn’t care. They continued to use it. knowing it wasn’t done “scientifically”, showcasing it as a wonderful proof of natural selection. In fact, they used it for a hundred years solely for the fact that it achieved what that wanted it to appear to have achieved, even if it did no such thing. And there were other errors and incomplete conclusions made as if all were fact.If you are saying the ends justifies the means, and you are a scientist, then your morals are quite defective.