But you, of course, see nothing here. Move on now, everyone go back home. Nothing to see here. You don’t even represent the views of your own school of thought. Only the desperate try to resuscitate Haeckel’s work. The entire evolutionary web, all branches, admit and know that Haeckel’s work was fraudulent. But you want to revive it because, well, it did show the truth, early vertebrate embryos are remarkably similar. That would be wonderful if it was true. When the early embryos from vetebrates that he used (fish, salamander, tortoise, chick, hog, calf, rabbit, and human) are compared as they REALLY in early stages, they show significant, sometimes vast differences between them. (Haeckel only represented five of the seven vertebrate classes and half the embryos were mammal). So far from being a full representation, it was a fraudulent one.