I do agree with your final point. Emotions get running high and everyone’s defense mechanisms kick in and friendly sites can turn into ad hominem attack factories. Sometimes people don’t answer valid questions because they can’t. Then the impulse is to “prove” a point that’s not in question in order to salvage the situation somewhat. AIG is a big target here, unjustly so, and much of what it is criticized for often turns out to have little or no truth to it. For example, based on another post I went and read and AIG article about the peppered moth experiment, and the blogger claimed that AIG “attacked” said article. Well, if you read it, it’s just a calm and rational assessment of said topic with no attack verbiage, no name calling, no innuendo, etc. just an opinion. When I experience things like that (and here it often happens) I just need to remember that someone is letting their heart take control of their head. It also explains why dialogue between creationists and evolutionists is near impossible. Both sides can be and are guilty of fallacious arguments. But I do notice the bile content tends to come from the anti-AIG crowd. I’m just saying.