answers: June 2018
context: Zablocki v. Redhail Zablocki v. Redhail, 434 U.S. 374 (1978), was a U.S. Supreme Court decision that held that Wisconsin Statutes §§ 245.10 (1), (4), (5) (1973) violated the Fourteenth Amendment Equal Protection Clause. Section 245.10 required noncustodial parents who were Wisconsin residents attempting to marry inside or outside of Wisconsin to seek a court order prior to receiving a marriage license. In order to receive such a court order, the noncustodial parent could not be in arrears on his or her child support, and the court had to believe that the child(ren) would not become dependent on the State. </s> Wayfair, Inc.", South Dakota noted that advances in computer technology have made it easier to determine appropriate sales tax based on the purchaser's location and requiring such "poses a minimal obstacle" in an era where retailers can easily tailor their online marketing based on customers' IP addresses. South Dakota argued that "Quill" should be overturned and that the case satisfied the Supreme Court's criteria for declining to overturn its previous ruling under the doctrine of "stare decisis". The Court agreed to hear the case in January 2018, with arguments heard in April 2018. The Court ruled in June 2018 on </s> COMPAS) violates due process rights by taking gender and race into account. Hearing this case would have given the court "the opportunity to rule on whether it violates due process to sentence someone based on a risk-assessment instrument whose workings are protected as a trade secret." The Supreme Court denied the writ of certiorari, thus declining to hear the case, on June 26, 2017. Loomis v. Wisconsin Loomis v. Wisconsin was a petition to the United States Supreme Court to overturn the previous Wisconsin Supreme Court ruling in "State v. Loomis". The case challenged the State of Wisconsin's use of
question: when will the wisconsin gerrymandering case be decided