text:
By an Act of Assembly — chapter 615 of the session of 1894 — it was provided that the County Treasurer of Anne Arundel County should be elected by the people on the Tuesday after the first Monday in November, 1897, and on the same day in every fourth year thereafter. It was declared that he should hold his office for four years from the first Monday of May next after his election "or until his successor is duly elected and qualified." By sec. 223 of the same statute it was enacted that the person elected should give bond and take an oath before the Clerk of the Circuit Court "in form similar to that heretofore taken by collectors of taxes, except as to the title of office;" and that in the event of his failure to give the bond and to qualify within thirty days after his election, the County Commissioners should declare the office vacant. The same section further provided that in the event of the treasurer's death the County Commissioners should proceed to fill the vacancy by the appointment of a suitable person to serve as treasurer until his successor shall be elected "at the next general election thereafter to be held for county officers in said county, and qualified as hereinafter required." At the election of 1897, Dr. C. Morris Cheston was elected treasurer. He gave bond and qualified and subsequently entered upon the discharge of his duties. In December, 1898, he died. Thereafter the County Commissioners appointed Dr. Benjamin R. Davidson to fill the vacancy. Dr. Davidson duly bonded and qualified. At the general election of 1899, Dr. Davidson and R. Tilghman Brice were candidates for the office and the latter was returned elected. Within thirty days after the election he gave bond and took the oath of office prescribed by sec. 6, Art. 1, of theConstitution, *Page 686
 but did not take the oath "heretofore taken by collectors of taxes," which is an oath exacted, not by the Constitution, but byArt. 81, § 36, of the Code. Dr. Davidson refused to surrender the office to Mr. Brice and based that refusal upon two grounds; viz., first, that the appointment made by the County Commissioners was for the unexpired portion of Dr. Cheston's term of four years, wherefore there had been no vacancy to be filled by an election, and would be none until 1901; and secondly,
 that the failure of Mr. Brice to take the oath prescribed for collectors of taxes was a "default * * * to * * qualify within thirty days" and rendered him ineligible even though he had taken and subscribed the constitutional oath. Application was thereupon made by Brice for a writ of mandamus requiring Davidson to surrender the office. The Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County held that Brice was legally entitled to the office and ordered the writ to issue, and from that order Davidson entered this appeal.
 The case is, in our opinion, entirely free from difficulty. The first of the two grounds upon which Davidson's refusal to vacate the office rests is completely and effectually swept away by the very statute which fixed the term of office and provided for the election of a county treasurer. The term is, by that statute, declared to be for four years from the first Monday of May succeeding the treasurer's election "or until his successor is duly elected and qualified." An incumbent duly elected and qualified, if he lives, or is not removed, or does not cease to reside in the county, or does not resign, is entitled to hold the office for four years from the first Monday of May ensuing his election, or longer, if his successor is not duly elected and does not qualify. But it is obvious that any of the contingencies just named might happen; and if one of them should occur the incumbent's tenure would terminate prior to the expiration of the four years; and accordingly the Legislature provided that in the event of the death of the treasurer, the County Commissioners should declare the office vacant and should fill *Page 687
 the vacancy, not for the residue of the original term, but until a successor should be elected at the next general election and should qualify. The appointee's tenure cannot, under the express words of the statute, reach beyond the general election next ensuing his appointment and the point of time thereafter when his successor chosen at that election shall qualify.
 The election of 1899 was a general election, and it was the next general election which occurred after the appointment of Dr. Davidson had been made. It was, therefore, the election at which, according to the mandate of the statute, a county treasurer was required to be chosen by the people. This being so, and Mr. Brice having at that election received a majority of the votes cast, is entitled to the office if he gave bond and properly qualified. Now, did he properly qualify?
 The only oath which he took was the one prescribed by sec. 6,Art. 1, of the Constitution. That oath reads as follows: "I ____ ____ do swear * * * that I will support the Constitution of the United States; and that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to the State of Maryland, and support the Constitution and laws thereof; and that I will to the best of my skill and judgment, diligently and faithfully without partiality or prejudice execute the office of ____ according to the Constitution and Laws of this State * * *." The oath provided by the Code to be taken by collectors of taxes is in these words: "I, ____ ____, collector of ____, do swear that I will well and truly execute the duties imposed upon me by law, and that I will justly and impartially value all property which I shall be authorized to value, according to the best of my skill and judgment; and that I will not, either directly or indirectly, make any profit of the money collected by me, by the use thereof in any manner whatever." Does his failure to take this latter oath disqualify him? Varying this question somewhat so as to present the controlling inquiry more sharply, we may ask, has the Legislature the *Page 688
 authority to prescribe as a qualification for the office of county treasurer any other oath than the one which sec. 6, Art.1, of the Constitution imposes? If it has, then Mr. Brice did not legally qualify; if it has not, then he did legally qualify.
 Sec. 6, Art. 1 of the Constitution is a mandatory provision. It emphatically requires that "Every person elected or appointed to any office of profit or trust under this Constitution, or underthe laws made pursuant thereto, shall, before he enters upon the duties of such office, take and subscribe the following oath or affirmation," and then comes the oath which has been transcribed above. But this is not all. Not content with prescribing the precise oath to be taken, the Declaration of Rights, in Art. 37, prohibits any other oath from being exacted, for it declares: "That no religious test ought ever to be required as a qualification for any office of profit or trust in this State, other than a declaration of belief in the existence of God; norshall the Legislature prescribe any oath of office than the oathprescribed by this Constitution." Here, then, is an explicit limitation on the power of the Legislature. In the face of this positive and plain inhibition how can it be insisted that the Legislature may impose as a qualification for a public office some other and additional oath "than the oath prescribed by the Constitution?" If it may require the county treasurer to take the oath prescribed by the Code for tax collectors, it may with equal propriety superadd some other and widely different oath and completely nullify the restrictive clause of Article 37 of the Declaration of Rights. It was the obvious purpose of the people who adopted the Constitution of 1867, to deprive the Legislature of any power to formulate or impose an oath of office, except as respects the State Comptroller and the State Treasurer, each of whom, under sec. 1, Article 6 of the Constitution, is required to "take such oath and enter into such bonds * * * * * as are now, or may hereafter be, prescribed by law." *Page 689
 The significance of the restrictive clause in Art. 37 of the Declaration of Rights is conspicuous, if antecedent Constitutions of the State are consulted, and if the history of the disturbed period covering the Civil War and just preceding the adoption of the Constitution of 1867 be recalled. If we turn to the Declaration of Rights of 1776 we find Art. 35 reading in this way: "That no other test or qualification ought to be required on admission to any office of trust or profit than such oath of support and fidelity to this State, and such oath of office as shall be directed by this Convention or the Legislature of thisState, and a declaration of a belief in the Christian religion." Art. 34 of the Declaration of Rights of 1851 was in these words: "That no other test or qualification ought to be required, on admission to any office of trust or profit, than such oath of office as may be prescribed by this Constitution, or by the lawsof the State, and a declaration of belief in the Christian religion; and, if the party shall profess to be a Jew, the declaration shall be of his belief in a future state of rewards and punishments." Art. 37 of the Declaration of Rights of 1864 declared: "That no other test or qualification ought to be required, on admission to any office of trust or profit, than such oath of allegiance and fidelity to this State and the United States as may be prescribed by this Constitution; and such oath of office and qualification as may be prescribed by this Constitution, or by the laws of the State, and a declaration of belief in the Christian religion, or in the existence of God, and in a future state of rewards and punishments." Under the power thus conferred upon the General Assembly various oaths in addition to the oaths prescribed in the several Constitutions were adopted by the Legislature and were required to be taken by different officers. Among them was that part of the tax collector's oath requiring him to faithfully act as assessor, imposed by by the Acts of 1841, ch. 23, and 1847, ch. 266,
 though the last part of the oath prohibiting him from making any personal profit out of the public funds was enacted in 1874, *Page 690 ch. 483. There can be no doubt that the Legislature had under the Declaration of Rights of 1776, 1851 and 1864 the authority to prescribe oaths of office, and in many instances this authority was exercised. When the Convention of 1867 assembled it was a common belief that many of the official oaths which the Legislature had previously prescribed in the exercise of an undoubted power were needlessly stringent, and this sentiment found expression in that provision of the Declaration of Rights which, by prohibiting any other official oath than the one set forth in the Constitution itself, took away from the General Assembly the power to adopt or require an additional one. The omission from the Declaration of Rights of 1867 of the authority contained in every antecedent Declaration of Rights, giving the Legislature the power to impose an official oath was deliberate, and to give emphasis to the design of the framers of the Constitution a positive prohibition, introduced for the first time, was substituted for the rejected clause.
 If we turn to the proceedings of the convention of 1867 it will be found that Article 37 of the Declaration of Rights was, when reported from the committee to the convention, worded precisely as is Article 34 of the Declaration of Rights of 1851; but upon motion of Mr. Bernard Carter the following substitute was adopted: "That no religious test ought ever to be required as a qualification for any office of profit or trust in this State, nor shall the Legislature prescribe any oath of office than the oath prescribed by this Constitution." This was amended by adding after the word State "other than a declaration of belief in the existence of God." Thus the old provision which gave to the Legislature the power to exact official oaths not prescribed by the organic law was not only deleted, but a new clause was put in which denied to the Legislature the authority it formerly possessed in this particular.
 Article 37 of the Declaration of Rights is not confined to offices created by the Constitution. It contains a broad *Page 691
 prohibition declaring that no oath of office except that prescribed by the Constitution shall be exacted. It is wholly immaterial whether the office be of constitutional creation or of statutory origin. The origin of the office is not the test as to what form of oath is to be taken. No office, however created, can be assumed until an official oath is taken, and no official oath other than that set forth in the Constitution can be required because that is the only one prescribed by the Constitution, and all others are prohibited by the Declaration of Rights. Art. 37 does two things. It prohibits any religious test as a qualification for any office of profit and trust, other than a declaration of belief in the existence of God; and it prohibitsany oath of office other than the one set forth in sec. 6,Art. 1, except as respects the Comptroller and Treasurer. By no known rule of interpretation can these prohibitions be confined to offices specifically created by the Constitution; nor can they be restricted to a narrower scope than their plain words indicate. If the last of the two prohibitions does not apply to an office created by statute then neither does the first, because the first is no more comprehensive than the second; and therefore if the Legislature may require a county treasurer to take an oath in addition to the constitutional oath, it may require some other religious test than a belief in the existence of God as a qualification for the same office. It has never been pretended that the Legislature could prescribe a religious test for a statutory office, but it has just as much power to prescribe one as it has to disregard the equally broad and emphatic prohibition against exacting any other official oath than the constitutional oath.
 Without discussing the cases relied on by the appellant's counsel, it is only necessary to say that they all arose on statutes passed prior to the adoption of the Constitution of 1867, and therefore passed when the Legislature had the authority to prescribe an additional official oath. Cases from beyond this State can have no influence on the interpretation of our own organic law. *Page 692
 It results from what we have said that the Legislature was without authority in 1894 to exact the additional oath required of the county treasurer, and as the exaction of it was unwarranted, the failure of Brice to take it cannot defeat his right to the office.
 For the reasons assigned we think the order appealed from was right and it must be affirmed with costs.
 Order affirmed with costs above and below.
 (Decided November 15th, 1900.)


type: other

text:
Sajtóközlemény | Szegedi Törvényszék
 Tájékoztatás előzetes sajtóregisztrációról - terrorcselekmény bűntette és más bűncselekmény
 A Szegedi Törvényszék 2018. március hó 14. (szerda) napján 9.00 órakor a 117. számú tárgyalóteremben folytatja az A. H. vádlottal szemben terrorcselekmény bűntette és más bűncselekmény miatt folyamatban lévő büntetőügy tárgyalását.
 Tájékoztatás előzetes letartóztatás elrendeléséről - költségvetési csalás bűntette és más bűncselekmények
 A Szegedi Járásbíróság ismételten elrendelte a bűnszervezetben, üzletszerűen elkövetett, különösen jelentős vagyoni hátrányt okozó költségvetési csalás bűntette és más bűncselekmények miatt indult nyomozás során dr. C. Cs. A. gyanúsított előzetes letartóztatását. A gyanúsított előzetes letartóztatása 2018. április hó 05. napjáig tart.
 Tájékoztatás nem jogerős ítéletről - kábítószer birtoklása bűntette
 A Szegedi Törvényszék nem jogerősen bűnösnek mondta ki C. A. vádlottat különösen jelentős mennyiségű kábítószerre elkövetett kábítószer birtoklása bűntettében, ezért őt 7 év börtön fokozatban végrehajtandó szabadságvesztésre és 7 év Magyarország területéről történő kiutasításra ítélte.
 Tájékoztatás másodfokú ítéletről - rongálás vétsége
 A Szegedi Törvényszék másodfokú tanácsa megváltoztatta a Szegedi Járásbíróság Sz. B. Z. vádlottal és társával szemben rongálás vétsége miatti büntetőügyben meghozott elsőfokú ítéletét akként, hogy a vádlottak vonatkozásában alkalmazott intézkedést megrovásra enyhítette.
 Tájékoztatás jogerős ítéletről - hivatali vesztegetés elfogadása bűntette
 A Szegedi Törvényszék Katonai Tanácsa bűnösnek mondta ki Cs. J. Cs. volt címzetes rendőr zászlós vádlottat hivatali vesztegetés elfogadása bűntettében, ezért 1 év börtönben végrehajtandó szabadságvesztésre és 2 év közügyektől eltiltásra ítélte. A vádlott a büntetés fele részének letöltése után feltételes szabadságra bocsátható.
 Tájékoztatás nem jogerős ítéletről - sikkasztás bűntette és más bűncselekmények
 A Szegedi Járásbíróság nem jogerősen bűnösnek mondta ki dr. K. L. vádlottat 10 rendbeli sikkasztás bűntettében és 7 rendbeli csalás bűntettében, ezért 6 év börtönben végrehajtandó szabadságvesztésre, 8 év közügyektől eltiltásra, 500.000 forint pénzbüntetésre és 8 év ügyvédi foglalkozástól eltiltásra ítélte.
 Tájékoztatás előzetes letartóztatás nem jogerős elrendeléséről - költségvetési csalás bűntette
 A Szegedi Járásbíróság nem jogerősen elrendelte azon tizenegy gyanúsított előzetes letartóztatását, akiket bűnszervezetben, üzletszerűen elkövetett, különösen jelentős vagyoni hátrányt okozó költségvetési csalás bűntette és más bűncselekmények megalapozott gyanúja miatt vett őrizetbe a vám- és pénzügyőrség.
 Tájékoztatás előzetes letartóztatás nem jogerős elrendeléséről - lőfegyverrel, lőszerrel visszaélés bűntette
 A Szegedi Járásbíróság nem jogerősen elrendelte annak a szerb állampolgárságú férfinak az előzetes letartóztatását, akit lőfegyverrel, lőszerrel visszaélés bűntettének megalapozott gyanúja miatt szombaton vett őrizetbe a rendőrség. A bíróság döntése alapján a gyanúsított előzetes letartóztatása 2018. március hó 06. napjáig tart.
 Tájékoztatás nem jogerős ítéletről - testi sértés bűntettének kísérlete
 A Szegedi Törvényszék nem jogerősen bűnösnek mondta ki P. M. vádlottat életveszélyt okozó testi sértés bűntettének kísérletében, ezért 3 év 6 hónap börtönben végrehajtandó szabadságvesztésre és 4 év közügyektől eltiltásra ítélte. A vádlott legkorábban a büntetés kétharmad részének kitöltését követő napon bocsátható feltételes szabadságra.
 Tájékoztatás tárgyaláson történt őrizetbe vételről
 A mai napon egy a Szegedi Törvényszéken folyamatban lévő büntetőügyben megtartott tárgyaláson a Pest Vidéki Nyomozó Ügyészség őrizetbe vette az egyik vádlott ügyvédi képviseletét ellátó személyt.


text:
U-II-168/93
 ECLI:SI:USRS:1993:U.II.168.93
 Predlog za rešitev spora o pristojnosti med upravnim organom in sodiščem, ker oba zavračata pristojnost, da odločita o zavrnitvi soglasja Zavoda za varstvo naravne in kulturne dediščine v Mariboru za odtujitev stanovanj, se zavrne.
 V sporu o pristojnosti med upravnim organom in sodiščem, ker oba zavračata pristojnost, je izkazano, da sodišče svojo pristojnost zavrača šele, ko je taka odločitev sodišča pravnomočna.
 Negativni spor o pristojnosti med upravnim organom in sodiščem.
 Procesne predpostavke za negativni spor o pristojnosti - pravnomočno končani postopki.
 Ustava, 8. al. 1. odst. 160. čl.
 Zakon o postopku pred Ustavnim sodiščem SRS (ZUSS), 3. al. 3. odst. 25. čl. in 34. čl.
 U-II-168-93.pdf
 U-II-168/93-5
 7/10-1993
 Ustavno sodišče je na seji dne 7/10-1993 obravnavalo predlog Zdravke Jurhar, Zdravomirja Živca, Janje Cizej in Josipine Domiter iz Maribora, ki jih zastopa Božidar Pajenk, odvetnik v Mariboru, in
 Predlagatelji so pri Občini Maribor vložili zahtevo za odkup stanovanj v stanovanjski hiši v Mariboru, Kamniška 2, ki je po predpisih o varstvu naravne in kulturne dediščine razglašena za kulturni spomenik. Občina je sklenitev kupnih pogodb odklonila, ker da Zavod za varstvo naravne in kulturne dediščine Maribor ni dal soglasja za odtujitev stanovanj, kot določa 51. člen zakona o naravni in kulturni dediščini (Uradni list SRS, št. 1/81, 42/86, 8/90 in Uradni list RS, št. 26/92)
 Predlagatelji so pri Temeljnem sodišču v Mariboru, Enoti v Mariboru, vložili tožbo zoper Občino Maribor, s katero so zahtevali, da je le-ta dolžna skleniti z njimi kupne pogodbe, sodišče pa je pravdni postopek prekinilo in naložilo tožnikom, da v okviru upravnega postopka izposlujejo soglasje za prodajo stanovanj. Predlagatelji so nato od zavoda za varstvo naravne in kulturne dediščine ponovno zahtevali soglasje, in sicer v obliki upravne odločbe. Zavod odločbe ni izdal, nakar so predlagatelji vložili pritožbo zaradi molka upravnega organa na Ministrstvo za varstvo okolja in urejanje prostora. To ministrstvo je pritožbo odstopilo v reševanje pristojnemu Ministrstvu za kulturo, ki pa je izdalo sklep, s katerim je pritožbo predlagateljev zavrglo, češ da zavod za varstvo naravne in kulturne dediščine ni upravni organ in da zato v upravnem postopku ni posebnega pravnega sredstva zoper njegovo soglasje. Spričo tega naj ne bi bila podana upravna pristojnost za odločanje o zahtevku, temveč sodna pristojnost.
 Upoštevaje opisani napotek Ministrstva za kulturo so predlagatelji v okviru pravdnega postopka predlagali, da sodišče oceni pravilnost in zakonitost ravnanja zavoda, vendar se je sodišče s sodbo postavilo na stališče, da ni pristojno posegati v oceno pravilnosti in zakonitosti odklonitve soglasja s strani zavoda.
 Predlagatelji zato menijo, da je nastal položaj, ko tako upravni organ kot tudi sodišče zavračata pristojnost, in predlagajo, naj ustavno sodišče odloči, kateri organ je pristojen za oceno utemeljenosti odklonitve soglasja Zavoda za varstvo naravne in kulturne dediščine v Mariboru.
 Ustavno sodišče je predlog zavrnilo. V pripravljalnem postopku je bilo na podlagi sporočila predlagateljev ugotovljeno, da sicer zoper sklep ministrstva za kulturo št. 362-3/93LP z dne 17/5-1993, s katerim je bila zavržena pritožba predlagateljev, ni bil sprožen upravni spor, da pa je bila zoper sodbo Temeljnega sodišča v Mariboru, Enote v Mariboru, št. IP 57/92 z dne 2/7-1993, s katero je to sodišče zavrnilo tožbeni zahtevek predlagateljev, vložena pritožba. Sodba torej v času vložitve predloga še ni bila pravnomočna, zaradi česar ni izkazan temelj za odločanje ustavnega sodišča v negativnem kompetenčnem konfliktu po 34. členu zakona o postopku pred Ustavnim sodiščem SR Slovenije (Uradni list SRS, št. 39/74 in 28/76), ki se po 7. členu ustavnega zakona za izvedbo ustave Republike Slovenije uporablja za odločanje v sporih o pristojnosti med sodišči in drugimi državnimi organi (8. alinega prvega odstavka 160. člena ustave). Samo v primeru pravnomočne odločitve sodišča je namreč izkazano, da sodišče svojo pristojnost zavrača.
 Ustavno sodišče je sprejelo ta sklep na podlagi 7. člena ustavnega zakona za izvedbo ustave Republike Slovenije, ob uporabi 3. alinee tretjega odstavka 25. člena zakona o postopku pred Ustavnim sodiščem SR Slovenije.
 Zdravka Jurhar in drugi, Maribor
 7. 10. 1993
 OdlUS II, 85
 US16736


type: wikipedia

text:
Dříve se jako antilopy označovali všichni zástupci čeledi turovití s výjimkou turů, ovcí a koz.
 V současné době jsou turovití členěni na několik podčeledí, z nichž antilopy tvoří hned několik:
 chocholatky (Cephalophinae)
 buvolci (Alcelaphinae)
 impaly (Aepycerotinae)
 přímorožci (Hippotraginae)
 bahnivci (Reduncinae)
 pravé antilopy (Antilopinae)
 srnčí antilopky (Peleinae)
 antilopky (Neotraginae)
 lesoni (Tragelapinae)
 Některé antilopy patří přímo do podčeledi tuři (Bovinae).
 Souhrnný název antilopy je tedy spíše věcí tradice, než skutečné označení nějaké taxonomické skupiny.
 Typická antilopa je štíhlé zvíře s dlouhýma nohama a krátkým ocasem. Některé druhy dokážou utíkat rychlostí až 95 km/h a patří mezi nejrychlejší suchozemská zvířata.
 Druhy, které mají v češtině rodové jméno antilopa
 antilopa koňská (Hippotragus equinus)
 antilopa modrá (Hippotragus leucophaeus)
 antilopa vraná (Hippotragus niger)
 antilopa srnčí (Pelea capreolus)
 antilopa žirafí (Litocranius walleri)
 antilopa skákavá (Litocranius walleri)
 antilopa jelení (Antilope cervicapra)
 antilopa trávní (Raphicerus campestris)
 antilopa černouchá (Raphicerus melanotis)
 antilopa Sharpeova (Raphicerus sharpei)
 antilopa čtyřrohá (Tetracerus quadricornis)
 antilopa losí (Taurotragus oryx)
 antilopa Derbyho (Taurotragus derbianus)
 Reference
 Externí odkazy
 Turovití


type: contracts

jurisdiction: EU

text:
 Avis juridique important
 |
 21999D0184
 Afgørelse truffet af Det Blandede EØS-udvalg nr. 184/1999 af 17. december 1999 om ændring af bilag XX (miljø) til EØS-aftalen
 EF-Tidende nr. L 074 af 15/03/2001 s. 0012 - 0013
 Afgørelse truffet af Det Blandede EØS-udvalgnr. 184/1999af 17. december 1999om ændring af bilag XX (miljø) til EØS-aftalenDET BLANDEDE EØS-UDVALG HAR -under henvisning til aftalen om Det Europæiske Økonomiske Samarbejdsområde som tilpasset ved protokollen om tilpasning af aftalen om Det Europæiske Økonomiske Samarbejdsområde, i det følgende benævnt "aftalen", særlig artikel 98, ogud fra følgende betragtninger:(1) Bilag XX til aftalen blev ændret ved afgørelse nr. 151/1999 truffet af Det Blandede EØS-udvalg den 5. november 1999(1).(2) Kommissionens beslutning 1999/427/EF af 28. maj 1999 om miljøkriterierne for tildeling af Fællesskabets miljømærke til opvaskemidler til opvaskemaskiner(2) og Kommissionens beslutning 1999/476/EF af 10. juni 1999 om opstilling af miljøkriterier for tildeling af Fællesskabets miljømærke til vaskemidler(3) bør indarbejdes i aftalen -TRUFFET FØLGENDE AFGØRELSE:Artikel 1Følgende punkt indsættes efter punkt 2ep (Kommissionens beslutning 1999/205/EF) i bilag XX til aftalen:"2eq. 399 D 0427: Kommissionens beslutning 1999/427/EF af 28. maj 1999 om miljøkriterierne for tildeling af Fællesskabets miljømærke til opvaskemidler til opvaskemaskiner (EFT L 167 af 2.7.1999, s. 38)."Artikel 2Teksten til punkt 2ef (Kommissionens beslutning 95/365/EF) affattes således:"399 D 0476: Kommissionens beslutning 1999/476/EF af 10. juni 1999 om opstilling af miljøkriterier for tildeling af Fællesskabets miljømærke til vaskemidler (EFT L 187 af 20.7.1999, s. 52)."Artikel 3Teksterne til beslutning 1999/427/EF og 1999/476/EF på islandsk og norsk, som er knyttet til de respektive sproglige udgaver af denne afgørelse, er autentiske.Artikel 4Denne afgørelse træder i kraft den 18. december 1999, forudsat at Det Blandede EØS-udvalg har modtaget alle fornødne meddelelser i henhold til aftalens artikel 103, stk. 1.Artikel 5Denne afgørelse offentliggøres i EØS-afsnittet i og EØS-tillægget til De Europæiske Fællesskabers Tidende.Udfærdiget i Bruxelles, den 17. december 1999.På Det Blandede EØS-udvalgs vegneN. v. LiechtensteinFormand(1) EFT L 15 af 18.1.2001, s. 51.(2) EFT L 167 af 2.7.1999, s. 38.(3) EFT L 187 af 20.7.1999, s. 52.


text:
XL Insurance tillagt fuld erstatning i sag om defekte børnesikre låg
 Advokat Torben Bondrop har for Sø- og Handelsretten og Højesteret repræsenteret XL Insurance (på vegne af Gerresheimer Vaerloese A/S, det tidligere Superfos Pharma Pack A/S) i en regressag inden for den farmaceutiske industri. Det lykkedes Torben Bondrop at få Højesteret til om omgøre Sø- og Handelsrettens dom, således at XL Insurance blev tillagt fuld erstatning hos Emballator Växjöplast AB.
 I år 2000 leverede Emballator Växjöplast millioner af børnesikre låg til det daværende Superfos Pharma Pack A/S til emballering af blandt andet Novo Nordisks diabetes 2 medicin, Prandin. Som følge af en fejlagtigt indstillet nyindkøbt lågsamlemaskine hos Emballator Växjöplast AB var 10% af lågene beskadigede, og ca. 1,5% af disse var så beskadigede, at det ville være meget vanskeligt eller umuligt at åbne emballagen på sædvanlig måde.
 XL Insurance betalte erstatning til Novo Nordisk for udgifter til ompakning, idet fejlen blev opdaget inden emballagerne blev frigivet til salg på primært det amerikanske marked. Emballator Växjöplast AB og selskabets ansvarsforsikringsselskab, Zürich Forsikring, var imidlertid af den opfattelse, at der ikke var noget at bebrejde Emballator Växjöplast AB. De ville derfor ikke erstatte XL Insurance det beløb, der var betalt i erstatning til Novo Nordisk.
 Sø- og Handelsretten fandt, at der på trods af den fejlindstillede lågsamlemaskine ikke var mangler ved de leverede låg, fordi der efter Sø- og Handelsrettens opfattelse ikke var tilstrækkeligt klare aftaler mellem parterne om, hvad acceptkriteriet var for fejl ved låg.
 Højesteret ændrer dom fra Sø- og Handelsretten
 Højesteret fastslog derimod, at uanset at kvalitetsaftalen mellem det daværende Superfos Pharma Pack A/S og Novo Nordisk, der var tiltrådt af Emballator Växjöplast AB, ikke fastsatte udtrykkelige kvalitetskrav, var lågene behæftet med en fejl af en sådan karakter, og i et sådant omfang, at der kunne kræves erstatning, jf. købelovens § 43, stk. 3. Højesteret tillagde det i den forbindelse også vægt, at der var tale om produktion af emballage til medicinalindustrien. Indsigelser om, at det daværende Superfos Pharma Pack A/S ikke havde reklameret rettidigt og ikke havde undersøgt pre-delivery samples tilstrækkeligt, blev afvist. Endvidere fandt Højesteret ikke, at det daværende Superfos Pharma Pack A/S havde tilsidesat sin tabsbegrænsningspligt, og hele det rejste erstatningskrav blev derfor imødekommet.
 Ellevte sejr i Højesteret
 Torben Bondrop er en af Plesners meget erfarne procedører, og det er 11. gang i træk, at Torben Bondrop vinder en sag ved Højesteret.
 Hvis der er spørgsmål til sagen, kan henvendelse rettes til advokat Torben Bondrop, gerne på tbo@plesner.com eller tlf. 33 12 11 33.


text:
 11/Sv. 089
 HR
 Službeni list Europske unije
 231
 22009D0043
 L 162/20
 SLUŽBENI LIST EUROPSKE UNIJE
 24.04.2009.
 ODLUKA ZAJEDNIČKOG ODBORA EGP-a
 br. 43/2009
 od 24. travnja 2009.
 o izmjeni Priloga II. (Tehnički propisi, norme, ispitivanje i potvrđivanje) Sporazumu o EGP-u
 ZAJEDNIČKI ODBOR EGP-a,
 uzimajući u obzir Sporazum o Europskom gospodarskom prostoru, kako je izmijenjen Protokolom o prilagodbi Sporazuma o Europskom gospodarskom prostoru, dalje u tekstu „Sporazum”, a posebno njegov članak 98.,
 budući da:
 (1)
 Prilog II. Sporazumu je izmijenjen Odlukom Zajedničkog odbora EGP-a br. 96/2008 od 26. rujna 2008. (1)
 (2)
 Uredba Komisije (EZ) br. 692/2008 od 18. srpnja 2008. o provedbi i izmjeni Uredbe (EZ) br. 715/2007 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća o homologaciji motornih vozila s obzirom na emisije iz lakih osobnih i teretnih vozila (Euro 5 i Euro 6) i dostupnosti podataka za popravke i održavanje vozila (2) treba se unijeti u Sporazum.
 (3)
 Direktiva Komisije 2008/89/EZ od 24. rujna 2008. o izmjeni, radi prilagodbe tehničkom napretku Direktive Vijeća 76/756/EEZ o ugradnji uređaja za osvjetljenje i svjetlosnu signalizaciju na motorna vozila i njihove prikolice (3) treba se unijeti u Sporazum,
 ODLUČIO JE:
 Članak 1.
 Poglavlje I. Priloga II. Sporazumu mijenja se kako slijedi:
 1.
 U točku 21. (Direktiva Vijeća 76/756/EEZ) dodaje se sljedeća alineja:
 „—
 32008 L 0089: Direktiva Komisije 2008/89/EZ od 24. rujna 2008. (SL L 257, 25.9.2008., str. 14.).”;
 2.
 U točku 45zt. (Uredba (EZ) br. 715/2007 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća) dodaje se sljedeće:
 „, kako je izmijenjena:
 —
 32008 R 0692: Uredbom Komisije (EZ) br. 692/2008 od 18. srpnja 2008. (SL L 199, 28.7.2008., str. 1.).”;
 3.
 Iza točke 45zt. (Uredba (EZ) br. 715/2007 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća) umeće se sljedeća točka:
 „45zu.
 32008 R 0692: Uredba Komisije (EZ) br. 692/2008 od 18. srpnja 2008. o provedbi i izmjeni Uredbe (EZ) br. 715/2007 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća o homologaciji motornih vozila s obzirom na emisije iz lakih osobnih i teretnih vozila (Euro 5 i Euro 6) i dostupnosti podataka za popravke i održavanje vozila (SL L 199, 28.7.2008., str. 1.).
 U smislu ovog Sporazuma vrijede odredbe ove Uredbe sa sljedećim prilagodbama:
 u Prilogu XIII. dodaje se sljedeće:
 U Prilogu XIII u točku 3.2 dodaje se sljedeće:
 ‚IS za Island
 FL za Lihtenštajn
 16 za Norvešku’ ”.
 Članak 2.
 Tekstovi Uredbe (EZ) br. 692/2008 i Direktive 2008/89/EZ na islandskom i norveškom jeziku, koji se objavljuju u Dodatku o EGP-u Službenom listu Europske unije, vjerodostojni su.
 Članak 3.
 Ova Odluka stupa na snagu 25. travnja 2009., pod uvjetom da su sve obavijesti iz članka 103. stavka 1. Sporazuma podnesene Zajedničkom odboru EGP-a (4).
 Članak 4.
 Ova se Odluka objavljuje u odjeljku o EGP-u i Dodatku o EGP-u Službenom listu Europske unije.
 Sastavljeno u Bruxellesu 24. travnja 2009.
 Za Zajednički odbor EGP-a
 Predsjednik
 Alan SEATTER
 (1) SL L 309, 20.11.2008., str. 15.
 (2) SL L 199, 28.7.2008., str. 1.
 (3) SL L 257, 25.9.2008., str. 14.
 (4) Ustavni zahtjevi nisu navedeni.


text:
 26.11.2013
 LV
 Eiropas Savienības Oficiālais Vēstnesis
 L 315/106
 ES UN EBTA APVIENOTĀS KOMITEJAS“VIENOTAIS TRANZĪTS”LĒMUMS Nr. 2/2013
 (2013. gada 7. novembris),
 ar ko groza 1987. gada 20. maija Konvenciju par kopīgu tranzīta procedūru
 (2013/675/ES)
 ES UN EBTA APVIENOTĀ KOMITEJA,
 ņemot vērā 1987. gada 20. maija Konvenciju par kopīgu tranzīta procedūru (1) un jo īpaši tās 15. panta 3. punkta a) apakšpunktu,
 tā kā:
 (1)
 Ar Muitas sadarbības padomes 2009. gada 26. jūnija Ieteikumu tika grozīta harmonizētās sistēmas nomenklatūra. Tā rezultātā 2012. gada 1. janvārī stājās spēkā Komisijas Īstenošanas regula (ES) Nr. 1006/2011 (2) un aizstāja HS kodu 1701 11 ar diviem jauniem HS kodiem, proti, 1701 13 un 1701 14 un HS kodu 2403 10 – ar diviem jauniem HS kodiem, proti, 2403 11 un 2403 19.
 (2)
 Tāpēc būtu attiecīgi jāmaina atbilstīgie HS kodi, kas norādīti 1987. gada 20. maija Konvencijas par kopīgu tranzīta procedūru I papildinājuma I pielikuma to preču sarakstā, kas saistītas ar paaugstinātu krāpšanas risku.
 (3)
 Tā kā ir jauna Apvienoto Nāciju Organizācijas Eiropas Ekonomikas komisijas Ieteikuma Nr. 21 versija – 8.1. versiju attiecībā uz inter alia iepakojuma kodiem, ir lietderīgi attiecīgi pielāgot konvencijas III papildinājuma A2 pielikumu.
 (4)
 Ņemot vērā to, ka iepakojuma kodu formāts ir mainījies no alphabetic2 (a2) uz alphanumeric2 (an2), iepakojumu veida/garuma kods (31. aile), kas paredzēts konvencijas III papildinājuma A1 pielikumā būtu attiecīgi jāgroza.
 (5)
 Ierosināto grozījumu rezultātā tiks īstenota noteikumu par kopīgu tranzītu saskaņošana ar ES noteikumiem tranzīta jomā.
 (6)
 Tāpēc konvencija būtu attiecīgi jāgroza,
 IR PIEŅĒMUSI ŠO LĒMUMU.
 1. pants
 1987. gada 20. maija Konvenciju par kopīgu tranzīta procedūru groza atbilstīgi šā lēmuma papildinājumam.
 2. pants
 Grozījumus, kas izklāstīti šā lēmuma papildinājuma 1. punktā, piemēro no 2012. gada 1. janvāra.
 Grozījumus, kas izklāstīti šā lēmuma papildinājuma 2. un 3. punktā, piemēro no 2013. gada 1. janvāra.
 Reikjavīkā, 2013. gada 7. novembrī
 ES un EBTA Apvienotās komitejas “Vienotais tranzīts” vārdā –
 priekšsēdētājs
 Karl F. GARðARSSON
 (1) OV L 226, 13.8.1987., 2. lpp.
 (2) Komisijas Īstenošanas regula (ES) Nr. 1006/2011 (2011. gada 27. septembris), ar ko groza I pielikumu Padomes Regulā (EEK) Nr. 2658/87 par tarifu un statistikas nomenklatūru un kopējo muitas tarifu (OV L 282, 28.10.2011., 1. lpp.).
 Papildinājums
 1.
 Konvencijas I papildinājuma I pielikumu groza šādi:
 i)
 HS kodu “1701 11, 1701 12, 1701 91, 1701 99” rindu aizstāj ar šādu:
 “1701 12
 1701 13
 1701 14
 1701 91
 1701 99
 Cukurniedru vai cukurbiešu cukurs un ķīmiski tīra saharoze, cietā veidā
 7 000 kg
 —
 —
 —
 —”
 ii)
 HS koda “240310” rindu aizstāj ar šādu:
 “2403 11
 2403 19
 Smēķējamā tabaka, kas satur vai nesatur tabakas aizstājējus jebkurā proporcijā
 35 kg
 —”
 2.
 Ierakstu konvencijas III papildinājuma A1 pielikumā “Iepakojums veids/garums a2 (31. aile) Izmanto iepakojuma kodus, kas minēti A2 pielikumā.” aizstāj ar šādu:
 “Iepakojums
 (31. aile)
 veids/garums: an2
 Izmanto iepakojuma kodus, kas minēti A2 pielikumā.”
 3.
 Konvencijas III papildinājuma A2 pielikuma 5. punktu aizstāj ar šādu:
 “IEPAKOJUMA KODS
 (ANO/EEK Ieteikums Nr. 21/rev. 8.1, 2010. gada 12. jūlijs)
 Aerosols
 AE
 Ampula, bez apvalka
 AM
 Ampula, apvalkā
 AP
 Smidzinātājs
 AT
 Maiss
 BG
 Maiss, elastīgs
 FX
 Maiss, džutas
 GY
 Maiss, ļoti liels
 JB
 Maiss, liels
 ŻB
 Maiss, vairākkārtu
 MB
 Maiss, papīra
 5M
 Maiss, papīra, vairākkārtu
 XJ
 Maiss, papīra, vairākkārtu, ūdensnecaurlaidīgs
 XK
 Maiss, polimēru
 EC
 Maiss, polimēru plēves
 XD
 Maiss, plastmasas
 44
 Maiss, liela tilpuma
 43
 Maiss, tekstilmateriāla
 5L
 Maiss, tekstilmateriāla, putekļdrošs
 XG
 Maiss, tekstilmateriāla, ūdensnecaurlaidīgs
 XH
 Maiss, tekstilmateriāla, neoderēts
 XF
 Maiss, ietilpīgs
 TT
 Maiss, polimēru auduma
 5H
 Maiss, polimēru auduma, putekļdrošs
 XB
 Maiss, polimēru auduma, ūdensnecaurlaidīgs
 XC
 Maiss, polimēru auduma, neoderēts
 XA
 Ķīpa, presēta
 BL
 Ķīpa, nepresēta
 BN
 Sfērisks trauks
 AL
 Balons, bez apvalka
 BF
 Balons, apvalkā
 BP
 Stienis
 BR
 Muca
 BA
 Muca, koka
 2C
 Muca, koka, ar spundi
 QH
 Muca, koka, ar noņemamu vāku
 QJ
 Stieņi, saiņos/saišķos
 BZ
 Tvertne
 BM
 Grozs
 BK
 Grozs ar rokturi, kartona
 HC
 Grozs ar rokturi, plastmasas
 HA
 Grozs ar rokturi, koka
 HB
 Saite
 B4
 Kanna
 BI
 Bloks
 OK
 Dēļi
 BD
 Dēļi, saiņos/saišķos
 BY
 Spole
 BB
 Baķis
 BT
 Pudele, gāzes
 GB
 Pudele bez apvalka, apaļa
 BS
 Pudele bez apvalka, cilindriska
 BO
 Pudele apvalkā, apaļa
 BV
 Pudele apvalkā, cilindriska
 BQ
 Pudeļu ieliktnis
 BC
 Kaste
 BX
 Kaste, alumīnija
 4B
 Kaste, CHEP (Commonwealth Handling Equipment Pool), Eurobox
 DH
 Kaste, kartona
 4G
 Kaste šķidrumiem
 BW
 Kaste, dabīga koka
 4C
 Kaste, plastmasas
 4H
 Kaste, plastmasas, palielināma
 QR
 Kaste, plastmasas, cieta
 QS
 Kaste, saplākšņa
 4D
 Kaste, reģenerēta koka
 4F
 Kaste, tērauda
 4A
 Kaste, koka, dabīga koka, parasta
 QP
 Kaste, koka, dabīga koka, putekļdroša
 QQ
 Spainis
 BJ
 Nefasēta gāze (1 031 mbar un 15 °C)
 VG
 Nefasēta sašķidrināta gāze (ar anormālu temperatūru/spiedienu)
 VQ
 Nefasēts šķidrums
 VL
 Nefasēti metāllūžņi
 VS
 Nefasētas, cietas, sīkas daļiņas (pulveri)
 VY
 Nefasētas, cietas, granulētas daļiņas (granulas)
 VR
 Nefasētas, cietas, lielas daļiņas (gabali)
 VO
 Sainis
 BH
 Saišķis
 BE
 Saišķis, koku
 8C
 Cisterna
 BU
 Sieta kaste
 CG
 Sieta kaste, CHEP (Commonwealth Handling Equipment Pool)
 DG
 Sprosts
 CW
 Kanna, cilindriska
 CX
 Kanna, taisnstūra
 CA
 Kanna ar rokturi un snīpi
 CD
 Skārda kārba
 CI
 Audekls
 CZ
 Kapsula
 AV
 Stikla balons, bez pinuma
 CO
 Stikla balons, pinumā
 CP
 Ieliktnis
 CM
 Ratiņi, plakanvirsmas
 FW
 Kārba, kartona
 CT
 Kasetne
 CQ
 Kaste
 CS
 Kaste, automobiļa
 7A
 Kaste, izotermiska
 EI
 Kaste, režģu
 SK
 Kaste, tērauda
 SS
 Kaste ar paliktņa pamatu
 ED
 Kaste ar paliktņa pamatu, kartona
 EF
 Kaste ar paliktņa pamatu, metāla
 EH
 Kaste ar paliktņa pamatu, plastmasas
 EG
 Kaste ar paliktņa pamatu, koka
 EE
 Kaste, koka
 7B
 Koka kanna
 CK
 Lāde
 CH
 Piena kanna
 CC
 Tvērējceltnis
 AI
 Slēdzama lādīte
 CF
 Zārks
 CJ
 Ritulis
 CL
 Iepakojums no kompozītmateriāliem, stikla trauks
 6P
 Iepakojums no kompozītmateriāliem, stikla trauks alumīnija režģu kastē
 YR
 Iepakojums no kompozītmateriāliem, stikla trauks alumīnija mucā
 YQ
 Iepakojums no kompozītmateriāliem, stikla trauks palielināmā plastmasas iepakojumā
 YY
 Iepakojums no kompozītmateriāliem, stikla trauks kokšķiedru mucā
 YW
 Iepakojums no kompozītmateriāliem, stikla trauks kartona kastē
 YX
 Iepakojums no kompozītmateriāliem, stikla trauks saplākšņa mucā
 YT
 Iepakojums no kompozītmateriāliem, stikla trauks cietā plastmasas iepakojumā
 YZ
 Iepakojums no kompozītmateriāliem, stikla trauks tērauda režģa kastē
 YP
 Iepakojums no kompozītmateriāliem, stikla trauks tērauda mucā
 YN
 Iepakojums no kompozītmateriāliem, stikla trauks pītā grozā ar vāku
 YV
 Iepakojums no kompozītmateriāliem, stikla trauks koka kastē
 YS
 Iepakojums no kompozītmateriāliem, plastmasas trauks
 6H
 Iepakojums no kompozītmateriāliem, plastmasas trauks alumīnija režģa kastē
 YD
 Iepakojums no kompozītmateriāliem, plastmasas trauks alumīnija mucā
 YC
 Iepakojums no kompozītmateriāliem, plastmasas trauks kokšķiedru mucā
 YJ
 Iepakojums no kompozītmateriāliem, plastmasas trauks kartona kastē
 YK
 Iepakojums no kompozītmateriāliem, plastmasas trauks plastmasas mucā
 YL
 Iepakojums no kompozītmateriāliem, plastmasas trauks saplākšņa kastē
 YH
 Iepakojums no kompozītmateriāliem, plastmasas trauks saplākšņa mucā
 YG
 Iepakojums no kompozītmateriāliem, plastmasas trauks cietas plastmasas kastē
 YM
 Iepakojums no kompozītmateriāliem, plastmasas trauks tērauda režģa kastē
 YB
 Iepakojums no kompozītmateriāliem, plastmasas trauks tērauda mucā
 YA
 Iepakojums no kompozītmateriāliem, plastmasas trauks koka kastē
 YF
 Konuss
 AJ
 Konteiners, elastīgs
 1F
 Konteiners, ar viena galona ietilpību
 GL
 Konteiners, metāla
 ME
 Konteiners, nav uzrādīts kā transporta aprīkojums
 CN
 Konteiners, ārējs
 OU
 Pārsegs, pārvalks, vāks
 CV
 Redeļu kaste
 CR
 Redeļu kaste, alus
 CB
 Redeļu kaste ar paliktni, kartona
 DK
 Redeļu kaste ar paliktni, plastmasas
 DL
 Redeļu kaste ar paliktni, koka
 DM
 Redeļu kaste, rāmī
 FD
 Redeļu kaste, augļu
 FC
 Redeļu kaste, metāla
 MA
 Redeļu kaste, piena
 MC
 Redeļu kaste, vairākslāņu, kartona
 DC
 Redeļu kaste, vairākslāņu, plastmasas
 DA
 Redeļu kaste, vairākslāņu, koka
 DB
 Redeļu kaste, sekla
 SC
 Redeļu kaste, koka
 8B
 Klūgu grozs
 CE
 Trauciņš
 CU
 Cilindrs
 CY
 Stikla pudele, bez apvalka
 DJ
 Stikla pudele, apvalkā
 DP
 Dozators
 DN
 Tvertne
 DR
 Tvertne, alumīnija
 1B
 Tvertne, alumīnija, ar nenoņemamu virsu
 QC
 Tvertne, alumīnija, ar noņemamu virsu
 QD
 Tvertne, šķiedru
 1G
 Tvertne, dzelzs
 DI
 Tvertne, plastmasas
 IH
 Tvertne, plastmasas, ar nenoņemamu virsu
 QF
 Tvertne, plastmasas, ar noņemamu virsu
 QG
 Tvertne, saplākšņa
 1D
 Tvertne, tērauda
 1A
 Tvertne, tērauda, ar nenoņemamu virsu
 QA
 Tvertne, tērauda, ar noņemamu virsu
 QB
 Tvertne, koka
 1W
 Aploksne
 EN
 Aploksne, tērauda
 SV
 Plēves iepakojums
 FP
 Muca
 FI
 Stikla kolba
 FL
 Elastīgs plastmasas maiss
 FB
 Elastīga plastmasas cisterna
 FE
 Pārtikas produktu tvertne
 FT
 Lādīte, slēdzama
 FO
 Rāmis
 FR
 Brusa/baļķis
 GI
 Brusas/baļķi, saiņos/saišķos
 GZ
 Grozs ar vāku
 HR
 Pakaramais
 HN
 Muca
 HG
 Lietnis
 IN
 Lietņi, saiņos/saišķos
 IZ
 Vidējs konteiners nefasētiem produktiem
 WA
 Vidējs konteiners nefasētiem produktiem, alumīnija
 WD
 Vidējs konteiners nefasētiem produktiem, alumīnija, šķidrumiem
 WL
 Vidējs konteiners nefasētiem produktiem, alumīnija, zem spiediena > 10 kPa
 WH
 Vidējs konteiners nefasētiem produktiem, kompozītiepakojums
 ZS
 Vidējs konteiners nefasētiem produktiem, kompozītiepakojums, elastīgas plastmasas, šķidrumiem
 ZR
 Vidējs konteiners nefasētiem produktiem, kompozītiepakojums, elastīgas plastmasas, zem spiediena
 ZP
 Vidējs konteiners nefasētiem produktiem, kompozītiepakojums, elastīgas plastmasas, cietām vielām
 ZM
 Vidējs konteiners nefasētiem produktiem, kompozītiepakojums, cietas plastmasas, šķidrumiem
 ZQ
 Vidējs konteiners nefasētiem produktiem, kompozītiepakojums, cietas plastmasas, zem spiediena
 ZN
 Vidējs konteiners nefasētiem produktiem, kompozītiepakojums, cietas plastmasas, cietām vielām
 ZL
 Vidējs konteiners nefasētiem produktiem, kartona
 ZT
 Vidējs konteiners nefasētiem produktiem, elastīgs
 ZU
 Vidējs konteiners nefasētiem produktiem, metāla
 WF
 Vidējs konteiners nefasētiem produktiem, metāla, šķidrumiem
 WM
 Vidējs konteiners nefasētiem produktiem, metāla, bet ne tērauda
 ZV
 Vidējs konteiners nefasētiem produktiem, metāla, spiediens 10 kPa
 WJ
 Vidējs konteiners nefasētiem produktiem, dabīga koka
 ZW
 Vidējs konteiners nefasētiem produktiem, dabīga koka, ar iekšēju pamatni
 WU
 Vidējs konteiners nefasētiem produktiem, papīra, vairākkārtu
 ZA
 Vidējs konteiners nefasētiem produktiem, papīra, vairākkārtu, ūdensnecaurlaidīgs
 ZC
 Vidējs konteiners nefasētiem produktiem, polimēru plēves
 WS
 Vidējs konteiners nefasētiem produktiem, saplākšņa
 ZX
 Vidējs konteiners nefasētiem produktiem, saplākšņa, ar iekšēju pamatni
 WY
 Vidējs konteiners nefasētiem produktiem, reģenerēta koka
 ZY
 Vidējs konteiners nefasētiem produktiem, reģenerēta koka, ar iekšēju pamatni
 WZ
 Vidējs konteiners nefasētiem produktiem, cietas plastmasas
 AA
 Vidējs konteiners nefasētiem produktiem, cietas plastmasas, savrups, šķidrumiem
 ZK
 Vidējs konteiners nefasētiem produktiem, cietas plastmasas, savrups, zem spiediena
 ZH
 Vidējs konteiners nefasētiem produktiem, cietas plastmasas, savrups, cietām vielām
 ZF
 Vidējs konteiners nefasētiem produktiem, cietas plastmasas, ar struktūras aprīkojumu, šķidrumiem
 ZJ
 Vidējs konteiners nefasētiem produktiem, cietas plastmasas, ar struktūras aprīkojumu, zem spiediena
 ZG
 Vidējs konteiners nefasētiem produktiem, cietas plastmasas, ar struktūras aprīkojumu, cietām vielām
 ZD
 Vidējs konteiners nefasētiem produktiem, tērauda
 WC
 Vidējs konteiners nefasētiem produktiem, tērauda, šķidrumiem
 WK
 Vidējs konteiners nefasētiem produktiem, tērauda, zem spiediena > 10 kPa
 WG
 Vidējs konteiners nefasētiem produktiem, auduma, bez pārvalka/oderes
 WT
 Vidējs konteiners nefasētiem produktiem, auduma, ar pārvalku
 WV
 Vidējs konteiners nefasētiem produktiem, auduma, ar pārvalku un oderi
 WX
 Vidējs konteiners nefasētiem produktiem, auduma, ar oderi
 WW
 Vidējs konteiners nefasētiem produktiem, plastmasas auduma, ar pārvalku
 WP
 Vidējs konteiners nefasētiem produktiem, plastmasas auduma, ar pārvalku un oderi
 WR
 Vidējs konteiners nefasētiem produktiem, plastmasas auduma, ar oderi
 WQ
 Vidējs konteiners nefasētiem produktiem, plastmasas auduma, bez pārvalka/oderes
 WN
 Burka
 JR
 Transportkanna, cilindriska
 JY
 Transportkanna, plastmasas
 3H
 Transportkanna, plastmasas, ar nenoņemamu virsu
 QM
 Transportkanna, plastmasas, ar noņemamu virsu
 QN
 Transportkanna, taisnstūraina
 JC
 Transportkanna, tērauda
 3A
 Transportkanna, tērauda, ar nenoņemamu virsu
 QK
 Transportkanna, tērauda, ar noņemamu virsu
 QL
 Krūze
 JG
 Džutas maiss
 JT
 Muca
 KG
 Muciņa
 KI
 Koka kaste
 LV
 Baļķis
 LG
 Baļķi, saiņos/saišķos
 LZ
 Partija
 LT
 Koka kaste augļiem un dārzeņiem
 LU
 Bagāža
 LE
 Maša, pītenis
 MT
 Sērkociņu kastīte
 MX
 Savstarpēji noteikts
 ZZ
 Kārba
 NS
 Tīkls
 NT
 Tīkls, caurules formas, plastmasas
 NU
 Tīkls, caurules formas, auduma
 NV
 Nav pieejams
 NA
 Kartona konteiners
 OT
 Paka
 PK
 Paka, kartona, ar pudeļu satveršanas caurumiem
 IK
 Paka ar lodziņu, kartona
 IB
 Paka ar lodziņu, metāla
 ID
 Paka ar lodziņu, plastmasas
 IC
 Paka ar lodziņu, koka
 IA
 Paka
 IF
 Paka, papīra ietinumā
 IG
 Paka
 IE
 Paciņa
 PA
 Kubls
 PL
 Paliktnis
 PX
 Paliktnis, 100 cm × 110 cm
 AH
 Paliktnis, AS 4068-1993
 OD
 Paliktnis, kaste Kombinēta atvērta kaste un paliktnis
 PB
 Paliktnis, CHEP 100 cm × 120 cm
 OC
 Paliktnis, CHEP 40 cm × 60 cm
 OA
 Paliktnis, CHEP 80 cm × 120 cm
 OB
 Paliktnis, ISO T11
 OE
 Paliktnis, modulis, siksnas 80 cm × 100 cm
 PD
 Paliktnis, modulis, siksnas 80 cm × 120 cm
 PE
 Paliktnis, modulis, siksnas 80 cm × 60 cm
 AF
 Paliktnis, ar pašsarūkošo plēvi
 AG
 Paliktnis, trīskārtu gofrēts
 TW
 Paliktnis, koka
 8A
 Paplātes veida konteiners
 P2
 Pasta paka
 PC
 Sprosts dzīvnieku pārvadāšanai
 PF
 Gabals
 PP
 Caurule
 PI
 Caurules, saiņos/saišķos
 PV
 Krūze ar osu
 PH
 Planka
 PN
 Plankas, saiņos/saišķos
 PZ
 Plāksne
 PG
 Plāksnes, saiņos/saišķos
 PY
 Platforma, neprecizēta svara vai izmēra
 OF
 Pods
 PT
 Maisiņš
 PO
 Groziņš, augļu
 PJ
 Statīvs
 RK
 Statīvs, drēbju pakaramais
 RJ
 Trauks, šķiedru
 AB
 Trauks, stikla
 GR
 Trauks, metāla
 MR
 Trauks, papīra
 AC
 Trauks, plastmasas
 PR
 Trauks, plastmasā ietverts
 MW
 Trauks, koka
 AD
 Plastmasas tīkls
 RT
 Spole
 RL
 Gredzens
 RG
 Stienis
 RD
 Stieņi, saiņos/saišķos
 RZ
 Rullis
 RO
 Maisiņš
 SH
 Maiss
 SA
 Maiss, daudzkārtu
 MS
 Jūrnieka lāde
 SE
 Ierīce
 SX
 Loksne
 ST
 Loksne, plastmasas ietinamais materiāls
 SP
 Metāla loksnes
 SM
 Loksnes, saiņos/saišķos
 SZ
 Plēves apvalkā
 SW
 Vadošā sliede
 SI
 Plātne
 SB
 Apvāks
 SY
 Pārvietojamā plāksne
 SL
 Vārpsta
 SD
 Spole
 SO
 Soma
 SU
 Priekšmets stieņa, bloka vai gabala veidā
 T1
 Cisternas veida konteiners, vispārējai lietošanai
 TG
 Cisterna, cilindriska
 TY
 Cisterna, taisnstūra
 TK
 Tējas lāde
 TC
 Muca
 TI
 Skārda kārba
 TN
 Paplāte
 PU
 Paplāte, uz kuras horizontāli sakrauti plakani elementi
 GU
 Paplāte, vienkārtaina, bez pārvalka, kartona
 DV
 Paplāte, vienkārtaina, bez pārvalka, plastmasas
 DS
 Paplāte, vienkārtaina, bez pārvalka, polistirola
 DU
 Paplāte, vienkārtaina, bez pārvalka, koka
 DT
 Paplāte, cieta, ar vāku, sakraujama kaudzē (CEN TS 14482:2002)
 IL
 Paplāte, divkārtaina, bez pārvalka, kartona
 DY
 Paplāte, divkārtaina, bez pārvalka, plastmasas
 DW
 Paplāte, divkārtaina, bez pārvalka, koka
 DX
 Čemodāns
 TR
 Sainis, saišķis
 TS
 Toveris
 TB
 Toveris ar vāku
 TL
 Tūba
 TU
 Tūba, izjaucama
 TD
 Tūba, ar uzgali
 TV
 Tūbas, saiņos/saišķos
 TZ
 Muca pārtikai
 TO
 Riepa
 TE
 Nenostiprināts
 UC
 Vienība
 UN
 Neiepakots vai nefasēts
 NE
 Neiepakots vai nefasēts, vairākas vienības
 NG
 Neiepakots vai nefasēts, viena vienība
 NF
 Vakuumiepakojumā
 VP
 Bagāžas iepakojums
 VK
 Tvertne/vāts
 VA
 Transportlīdzeklis
 VN
 Stobriņš/mēģene
 VI
 Pudele pinumā
 WB”


text:
 31.10.2013
 ET
 Euroopa Liidu Teataja
 L 291/27
 EMP ÜHISKOMITEE OTSUS
 nr 70/2013,
 3. mai 2013,
 millega muudetakse EMP lepingu II lisa („Tehnilised normid, standardid, katsetamine ja sertifitseerimine”)
 EMP ÜHISKOMITEE,
 võttes arvesse Euroopa Majanduspiirkonna lepingut (edaspidi „EMP leping”), eriti selle artiklit 98,
 ning arvestades järgmist:
 (1)
 Lepingusse tuleb inkorporeerida komisjoni 20. mai 2011. aasta määrus (EL) nr 494/2011, millega muudetakse Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu kemikaalide registreerimist, hindamist, autoriseerimist ja piiramist käsitleva määruse (EÜ) nr 1907/2006 (REACH) XVII lisa kaadmiumi osas, (1) parandatud ELTs L 136, 24.5.2011, lk 105.
 (2)
 Seetõttu tuleks EMP lepingu II lisa vastavalt muuta,
 ON VASTU VÕTNUD KÄESOLEVA OTSUSE:
 Artikkel 1
 Lepingu II lisa XV peatüki punkti 12zc (Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu määrus (EÜ) nr 1907/2006) lisatakse järgmine taane:
 „—
 32011 R 0494: komisjoni määrus (EL) nr 494/2011, 20. mai 2011 (ELT L 134, 21.5.2011, lk 2), parandatud ELTs L 136, 24.5.2011, lk 105.”
 Artikkel 2
 Määruse (EL) nr 494/2011 (parandatud ELTs L 136, 24.5.2011, lk 105) islandi- ja norrakeelne tekst, mis avaldatakse Euroopa Liidu Teataja EMP kaasandes, on autentsed.
 Artikkel 3
 Käesolev otsus jõustub 4. mail 2013, tingimusel et EMP ühiskomiteele on esitatud kõik lepingu artikli 103 lõike 1 kohased teated (2).
 Artikkel 4
 Käesolev otsus avaldatakse Euroopa Liidu Teataja EMP osas ja EMP kaasandes.
 Brüssel, 3. mai 2013
 EMP ühiskomitee nimel
 eesistuja
 Gianluca GRIPPA
 (1) ELT L 134, 21.5.2011, lk 2.
 (2) Põhiseadusest tulenevaid nõudeid ei ole nimetatud.


text:
A whistle is an instrument which produces sound from a stream of gas, most commonly air. It may be mouth-operated, or powered by air pressure, steam, or other means. Whistles vary in size from a small slide whistle or nose flute type to a large multi-piped church organ.
 Whistles have been around since early humans first carved out a gourd or branch and found they could make sound with it. In prehistoric Egypt, small shells were used as whistles. Many present day wind instruments are inheritors of these early whistles. With the rise of more mechanical power, other forms of whistles have been developed.
 One characteristic of a whistle is that it creates a pure, or nearly pure, tone. The conversion of flow energy to sound comes from an interaction between a solid material and a fluid stream. The forces in some whistles are sufficient to set the solid material in motion. Classic examples are Aeolian tones that result in galloping power lines, or the Tacoma Narrows Bridge (the so-called "Galloping Gertie" of popular media). Other examples are circular disks set into vibration.
 History
 Early whistles
 Whistles made of bone or wood have been used for thousands of years. Whistles were used by the Ancient Greeks to keep the stroke of galley slaves.
 Archaeologist have found at the ruins of the ancient Greek city of Assos a terracotta whistle, most probably a child’s toy putting in children’s graves as a burial gift.
 The English used whistles during the Crusades to signal orders to archers. Boatswain pipes were also used in the age of sail aboard naval vessels to issue commands and salute dignitaries.
 Joseph Hudson
 Joseph Hudson set up J Hudson & Co in Birmingham in 1870. With his younger brother James, he designed the "Acme City" brass whistle. This became the first referee whistle used at association football matches during the 1878–79 Football Association Cup match between Nottingham Forest and Sheffield. Prior to the introduction of the whistle, handkerchiefs were used by the umpires to signal to the players.
 In 1883, he began experimenting with pea-whistle designs that could produce an intense sound that could grab attention from over a mile away. His invention was discovered by accident when he dropped his violin and it shattered on the floor. Observing how the discordant sound of the breaking strings travelled (trill effect), Hudson had the idea to put a pea in the whistle. Prior to this, whistles were much quieter and were only thought of as musical instruments or toys for children. After observing the problems that local police were having with effectively communicating with rattles, he realised that his whistle designs could be used as an effective aid to their work.
 Hudson demonstrated his whistle to Scotland Yard and was awarded his first contract in 1884. Both rattles and whistles were used to call for back-up in areas where neighbourhood beats overlapped, and following their success in the Metropolitan Police of London, the whistle was adopted by most polices in the United Kingdom.
 World War I
 During World War I, officers of the British Army and United States Army used whistles to communicate with troops, command charges and warn when artillery pieces where going to fire. Most whistles used by the British were manufactured by J & Hudson Co.
 See also
 Vessel flute (acoustics of whistles and tunable whistles)
 Low whistle (low-pitched tinwhistle or flageolet)
 Liquid whistle (mixes fluids)
 Physics of whistles
 Firedamp whistle (for detecting methane in mines)
 Whistler (radio) (very low frequency radio feature caused by lightning and atmospheric effects)
 Rossby whistle (climate oscillation of the Caribbean)
 References
 External links
 Whistle (Polish folk musical instruments)
 Internal fipple flutes
 Blown percussion instruments
 English musical instruments
 Sports officiating technology
 Toy instruments and noisemakers


type: legislation

text:
 IL-KUMMISSJONI EWROPEA
 Brussell, 23.11.2015
 COM(2015) 805 final
 2015/0271(NLE)
 Proposta għal
 DEĊIŻJONI TAL-KUNSILL
 dwar il-pożizzjoni li trid tittieħed f’isem l-Unjoni Ewropea, fir-rigward tad-deċiżjonijiet li trid tadotta l-Kummissjoni Permanenti tal-Eurocontrol, dwar ir-rwoli u l-kompiti tal-Eurocontrol u dwar is-servizzi ċentralizzati
 MEMORANDUM TA’ SPJEGAZZJONI
 1.KUNTEST TAL-PROPOSTA
 1.1.Ir-raġunijiet għall-proposta u l-għanijiet tagħha
 Ġenerali
 Din il-proposta tikkonċerna l-pożizzjoni li trid tieħu l-Kummissjoni Permanenti tal-Eurocontrol dwar id-definizzjoni tar-rwoli u tal-kompiti tal-Eurocontrol minn naħa, u l-attività fil-qasam tas-Servizzi Ċentralizzati min-naħa l-oħra. Fit-8 u fid-9 ta' Diċembru din il-Kummissjoni mistennija tiltaqa' biex tindirizza dawn iż-żewġ punti.
 Dan il-kuntest juri fejn waslet l-attività tal-Eurocontrol, li xi drabi tirfes l-attività tal-Unjoni, fl-oqsma koperti mil-leġiżlazzjoni tal-Unjoni.
 Matul l-aħħar għaxar snin saru sforzi biex jiġi evitat dan it-trikkib u biex jinkisbu l-aħjar riżultati possibbli fid-dawl tar-riżorsi disponibbli fuq iż-żewġ naħat. Minħabba f'hekk il-Eurocontrol twettaq kompiti skont il-leġiżlazzjoni tal-Ajru Uniku Ewropew (SES). L-organizzazzjoni ġiet inkarigata bi tliet kompiti/rwoli ewlenin:
 (1)Li tipprovdi appoġġ tekniku lill-Kummissjoni u lill-Aġenzija Ewropea tas-Sikurezza tal-Avjazzjoni (EASA) biex tgħinhom fl-azzjonijiet regolatorji tagħhom, fir-rigward tal-azzjoni regolatorja tagħhom, f’konformità mal-Ftehim ta’ Livell Għoli bejn l-UE u l-Eurocontrol tad-29 ta’ Ottubru 2012.
 (2)Li taġixxi bħala l-Korp ta’ Analiżi tal-Prestazzjoni biex tgħin lill-Kummissjoni fl-iżvilupp u fl-implimentazzjoni tal-iskema ta’ prestazzjoni (deżinjazzjoni mill-Kummissjoni sa tmiem l-2016).
 (3)Li taġixxi bħala l-Maniġer tan-Netwerk għall-funzjonijiet tan-Netwerk tal-Ġestjoni tat-Traffiku tal-Ajru (ATM) (deżinjazzjoni mill-Kummissjoni sa tmiem l-2019).
 Barra minn hekk, il-Eurocontrol hija membru fundatur flimkien mal-Unjoni fl-Impriża Konġunta tar-Riċerka dwar il-Ġestjoni tat-Traffiku bl-Ajru tal-Ajru Uniku Ewropew (SESAR) (sa mill-2007).
 Il-Ftehim ta’ Livell Għoli (HLA) tal-2012 jirrikonoxxi l-kontribut li kull organizzazzjoni tista’ tagħmel għall-ATM Ewropea. Jafferma mill-ġdid ir-rwoli rispettivi tal-Unjoni bħala regolatur pan-Ewropew uniku u tal-Eurocontrol fl-appoġġ tekniku biex jintlaħqu l-għanijiet tal-politika tal-SES.
 Il-punti msemmija hawn fuq iridu jitqiesu fil-kuntest tal-qafas li jirregola b’mod ġenerali r-rwoli u l-kompiti tal-organizzazzjoni, li huwa l-ewwel punt li trid tittratta l-Kummissjoni Permanenti fil-laqgħa msemmija hawn fuq.
 Bħalissa fil-prinċipju, l-operat tal-Eurocontrol huwa rregolat mill-Konvenzjoni Internazzjonali dwar il-kooperazzjoni għas-sigurtà tan-navigazzjoni bl-ajru, kif emendata mill-Protokoll iffirmat fi Brussell fit-12 ta’ Frar 1981 (“il-Konvenzjoni Emendata”). Madankollu fis-27 ta’ Ġunju 1997, il-partijiet kontraenti ffirmaw Protokoll li Jikkonsolida bil-ħsieb li, fost l-oħrajn, jemendaw id-definizzjoni tal-kompiti tal-organizzazzjoni. Il-Konvenzjoni, kif emendata b'dak il-Protokoll, ġeneralment tissejjaħ “il-Konvenzjoni riveduta”. Madankollu l-Protokoll li Jikkonsolida għadu ma daħalx fis-seħħ.
 Fid-9 ta’ Diċembru 1997, il-Kummissjoni Permanenti tal-Eurocontrol adottat id-Deċiżjoni Nru 71 dwar l-implimentazzjoni bikrija tal-Artikolu 2(1) tal-Konvenzjoni riveduta, biex tiddefinixxi l-kompiti li għandha twettaq l-organizzazzjoni.
 L-attivitajiet tal-Grupp ta' Studju tal-Eurocontrol dwar ir-riforma tal-organizzazzjoni jestendu, fost l-oħrajn, għal dan l-aspett. Matul is-sitt laqgħa tiegħu, li saret fid-19 ta’ Ottubru 2015, dan il-Grupp ta’ Studju inkariga lill-Aġenzija tal-Eurocontrol biex tħejji Att tal-Kummissjoni Permanenti li jiddefinixxi l-funzjonijiet, il-kompiti u r-rwoli futuri tal-organizzazzjoni, biex jiġi ppreżentat u adottat fil-laqgħa li jmiss tal-Kummissjoni Permanenti fit-8 u fid-9 ta’ Diċembru 2015.
 Dik id-deċiżjoni tal-Kummissjoni Permanenti se jkollha effetti legali. Skont il-qafas istituzzjonali applikabbli tal-organizzazzjoni, stabbilit fil-Konvenzjoni Emendata, il-Kummissjoni Permanenti hija responsabbli biex "tifformula l-politika ġenerali tal-Organizzazzjoni".
 Min-naħa l-oħra, id-definizzjoni tar-rwoli u tal-kompiti se tirregola l-azzjoni futura tal-Eurocontrol u, bl-istess mod, se tirrifletti neċessarjament dik li l-organizzazzjoni tqis bħala l-attività leġittima. Din se torbot lill-membri kollha tal-Eurocontrol, inklużi lill-Istati Membri tal-Unjoni.
 F’dan ir-rigward, għandu jiġi osservat li d-deċiżjoni tal-Kummissjoni Permanenti jista’ jkollha konsegwenzi fuq l-applikazzjoni tal-liġi tal-UE u, b’mod partikolari, fuq l-integrità tal-kompetenzi tal-UE, billi l-leġiżlazzjoni tal-Unjoni tkopri oqsma importanti li fihom hija attiva l-Eurocontrol. F’xi każijiet, ir-rwol u l-attività tal-Eurocontrol jiddependu fuq id-deċiżjonijiet li jridu jittieħdu fil-livell tal-Unjoni (ara hawn fuq). Għaldaqstant huwa importanti li jiġi żgurat li d-definizzjoni tar-rwoli u tal-kompiti tal-Eurocontrol ma tkunx f’kunflitt mal-liġi tal-UE, b’mod partikolari mal-kompetenzi tal-UE, u li din ma tippreġudikax azzjoni futura tal-UE.
 It-tieni punt li jrid jiġi ttrattat fil-laqgħa tal-Kummissjoni Permanenti msemmija hawn fuq jirrigwarda l-attività tal-Eurocontrol dwar is-Servizzi Ċentralizzati. B’mod aktar preċiż, huwa mistenni li tiġi adottata deċiżjoni dwar il-finanzjament ta’ ċerti servizzi ċentralizzati. Il-kwistjoni tas-servizzi ċentralizzati għandha titqies fil-kuntest tal-attività tal-Unjoni fil-qasam tal-proġett tar-Riċerka dwar l-ATM tal-Ajru Uniku Ewropew (SESAR) u l-funzjonijiet tal-ġestjoni tan-netwerk kif stabbilit fir-Regolament (UE) 677/2011. F’dan ir-rigward, huwa importanti li jiġi enfasizzat li l-għoti ta’ dawn is-Servizzi Ċentralizzati jimplika d-disponibbiltà tal-infrastruttura tal-ATM meħtieġa fis-siti ċentrali, reġjonali u lokali, kif xieraq. L-użu ta’ dik l-infrastruttura jiddependi fuq id-deċiżjonijiet li jridu jittieħdu fil-livell tal-Unjoni fil-kuntest tas-SESAR, b’mod partikolari f’dak li għandu x’jaqsam mas-sistemi ta’ komunikazzjoni mill-ajru sal-art u mill-art sal-art. Dawn id-deċiżjonijiet se jkunu r-riżultat ta' analiżi dettaljata tal-kostijiet u tal-benefiċċji, il-governanza, l-investiment, is-sigurtà u d-difiża, u l-identifikazzjoni tal-valur miżjud li joriġina mill-forniment ċentralizzat ta’ tali servizzi, inklużi dawk is-servizzi li diġà huma fis-seħħ fuq skala limitata. Barra minn hekk, il-forniment ta’ Servizzi Ċentralizzati jistgħu jirrikjedu deċiżjonijiet fil-livell tal-Unjoni dwar x’għandu jkun ir-rwol tal-Maniġer tan-Netwerk biex jaġixxi bħala fornitur ta’ dawn is-Servizzi Ċentralizzati. F'ċirkostanzi bħal dawn, ikun prematur li f'dan l-istadju l-Eurocontrol tieħu deċiżjoni dwar il-finanzjament ta’ ċerti Servizzi Ċentralizzati, u din id-deċiżjoni tista' tippreġudika attivitajiet futuri mmexxija mill-Eurocontrol b’tali mod li tista' tagħmel ħsara lill-attività tal-Unjoni f’dan il-qasam, b’mod partikolari fir-rigward tas-SESAR. Għadaqstant jeħtieġ li jintalab posponiment ta’ dik id-deċiżjoni billi l-Unjoni bħalissa ma għandhiex biżżejjed informazzjoni biex tevalwa s-sitwazzjoni. .
 Il-korpi tal-Eurocontrol ma jaċċettawx il-parteċipazzjoni tal-Unjoni fil-Kummissjoni Permanenti, filwaqt li l-pajjiżi membri, inklużi l-Istati Membri kollha tal-UE huma aċċettati. Għaldaqstant, il-pożizzjoni stabbilita f’din il-proposta hi maħsuba biex tiġi appoġġjata mill-Istati Membri, meta jaġixxu fil-Kummissjoni Permanenti.
 Permezz tal-Artikolu 4(3) tat-TUE, l-Istati Membri huma obbligati wkoll, bħalma huma l-istituzzjonijiet tal-Unjoni, li jiddefendu l-istess pożizzjoni fil-Kunsill Proviżorju tal-Eurocontrol, il-korp preparatorju kompetenti.
 L-isfond rigward ir-rwoli u l-kompiti tal-Eurocontrol
 Fl-2013, il-Eurocontrol nediet dibattitu dwar ir-riforma tal-organizzazzjoni tagħha. Fl-4 ta’ Diċembru 2013, il-Kummissjoni Permanenti tal-Eurocontrol waqqfet Grupp ta’ Studju intern biex jinvestiga liema punti jridu jiġu emendati fil-Konvenzjoni tal-Eurocontrol sabiex din tiġi adattata għat-tibdil fix-xenarju tal-ġestjoni tat-traffiku tal-ajru fl-Ewropa.
 Id-diskussjonijiet baqgħu għaddejjin fl-aħħar sentejn. Matul l-aktar laqgħa reċenti tal-Grupp ta' Studju tal-Eurocontrol, li saret fid-19 ta' Ottubru 2015, il-president tal-Grupp ikkonkluda li l-Aġenzija Eurocontrol għandha tħejji proposta dwar is-servizzi, ir-rwoli u l-kompiti tal-Eurocontrol, kif deskritt fil-kapitolu 4 ta' dokument propost minn xi Stati Membri tal-Eurocontrol (Eurocontrol Study Group of Alternates discussion paper CN-SG-6-2015-2: "Future role and tasks of the Organisation") u li dwaru l-president qies li kien hemm livell raġonevoli ta' kunsens fil-Grupp ta' Studju.
 Waqt l-44 laqgħa tal-Kunsill Proviżorju (PC44) fid-9 ta' Diċembru 2015 hu ppjanat li jiġi adottat Att tal-Kummissjoni Permanenti dwar ir-rwoli u l-kompiti tal-organizzazzjoni. Dan l-Att se jispeċifika d-Deċiżjoni Nru 71 eżistenti tad-9 ta’ Diċembru 1997 dwar l-implimentazzjoni bikrija tal-Artikolu 2.1 tal-Konvenzjoni riveduta.
 L-isfond rigward l-iżvilupp ta’ Servizzi tal-ATM Ċentralizzati
 Il-ħidma tal-Aġenzija Eurocontrol fejn jidħlu s-Servizzi Ċentralizzati mxiet 'il quddiem ferm minn kemm ilha li twaqqfet lejn tmiem l-2012. L-Aġenzija Eurocontrol ġiet awtorizzata mill-Kummissjoni Permanenti tagħha fi Frar 2014 biex tagħti bidu għal approċċ gradwali għall-valutazzjoni u għad-dimostrazzjoni tal-fattibbiltà operattiva, teknika u finanzjarja ta’ dawn is-Servizzi Ċentralizzati potenzjali, filwaqt li tirrikonoxxi l-livelli differenti ta’ maturità bejn dawn is-servizzi. Minn dak iż-żmien, l-Aġenzija Eurocontrol organizzat sensiela ta’ sessjonijiet ta’ ħidma, u żviluppat Kunċetti tal-Operazzjonijiet (CONOPs) għal għadd ta’ Servizzi Ċentralizzati. Hija pproduċiet Analiżi Kostijiet-Benefiċċji globali (CBA) li ġiet approvata minn konsulent indipendenti, iżda d-dettalji f'din is-CBA ma ġewx soġġetti għal skrutinju pubbliku.
 Waqt l-44 laqgħa tal-Kunsill Proviżorju (PC44) fid-9 ta' Diċembru 2015 mistenni jiġi adottat Att tal-Kummissjoni Permanenti dwar il-finanzjament tas-Servizzi Ċentralizzati. Dan l-Att iniedi l-fażi tad-dimostrazzjoni ta’ ċerti Servizzi Ċentralizzati.
 2.ELEMENTI LEGALI TAL-PROPOSTA
 Fl-isfond deskritt hawn fuq u abbażi tal-Artikoli 100(2) u 218(9) tat-TFUE, huwa propost li tiġi adottata l-pożizzjoni li trid tittieħed f'isem l-Unjoni fir-rigward tad-deċiżjonijiet li trid tadotta l-Kummissjoni Permanenti tal-Eurocontrol, dwar ir-rwoli u l-kompiti tal-Eurocontrol u dwar is-Servizzi Ċentralizzati.
 2015/0271 (NLE)
 Proposta għal
 DEĊIŻJONI TAL-KUNSILL
 dwar il-pożizzjoni li trid tittieħed f’isem l-Unjoni Ewropea, fir-rigward tad-deċiżjonijiet li trid tadotta l-Kummissjoni Permanenti tal-Eurocontrol, dwar ir-rwoli u l-kompiti tal-Eurocontrol u dwar is-servizzi ċentralizzati
 IL-KUNSILL TAL-UNJONI EWROPEA,
 Wara li kkunsidra t-Trattat dwar il-Funzjonament tal-Unjoni Ewropea, u b'mod partikolari l-Artikolu 100(2) u l-Artikolu 218(9) tiegħu,
 Wara li kkunsidra l-proposta tal-Kummissjoni Ewropea,
 Billi:
 (1)Il-Kummissjoni Permanenti tal-Eurocontrol, permezz tad-Deċiżjoni Nru 123 tal-4 ta’ Diċembru 2013, waqqfet Grupp ta’ Studju biex jinvestiga xi jrid jiġi emendat fil-Konvenzjoni tal-Eurocontrol sabiex din tiġi adattata għax-xenarju tal-ġestjoni tat-traffiku tal-ajru li dejjem qed jevolvi fl-Ewropa.
 (2)Fid-19 ta' Ottubru 2015, il-Grupp ta’ Studju inkariga lill-Aġenzija Eurocontrol bit-tfassil ta' abbozz ta’ Att tal-Kummissjoni Permanenti li jiddefinixxi r-rwoli, il-kompiti u l-funzjonijiet futuri tal-organizzazzjoni.
 (3)Abbozz ta’ deċiżjoni tal-Kummissjoni Permanenti dwar ir-rwoli u l-kompiti tal-organizzazzjoni se jkun fuq l-aġenda tagħha għall-approvazzjoni fit-8 u fid-9 ta’ Diċembru 2015.
 (4)Dik id-deċiżjoni se jkollha effetti legali. Skont il-qafas istituzzjonali applikabbli tal-organizzazzjoni, stabbilit fil-Konvenzjoni Internazzjonali tal-Eurocontrol, kif emendat bil-Protokoll iffirmat fi Brussell fit-12 ta' Frar 1981 ("il-Konvenzjoni Emendata"), il-Kummissjoni Permanenti hija responsabbli biex "tifformula l-politika ġenerali tal-Organizzazzjoni". Min-naħa l-oħra, id-definizzjoni tar-rwoli u tal-kompiti se tirregola l-azzjoni futura tal-Eurocontrol u bl-istess mod se tirrifletti neċessarjament dak li l-organizzazzjoni tqis bħala attività leġittima. Din se torbot lill-membri kollha tal-Eurocontrol, inklużi l-Istati Membri tal-Unjoni.
 (5)Id-definizzjoni tar-rwoli u tal-kompiti tal-Eurocontrol, li hija l-għan tad-deċiżjoni tal-Kummissjoni Permanenti, jista' jkollha konsegwenzi fuq l-applikazzjoni tal-liġi tal-Unjoni u, b’mod partikolari, fuq l-integrità tal-kompetenzi tal-UE, għax il-leġiżlazzjoni tal-Unjoni tkopri oqsma importanti li fihom hija attiva l-Eurocontrol. F’xi każijiet, ir-rwol u l-attività tal-Eurocontrol jiddependu fuq id-deċiżjonijiet meħuda fil-livell tal-Unjoni.
 (6)Għaldaqstant, huwa importanti li jiġi żgurat li d-definizzjoni tar-rwoli u tal-kompiti tal-Eurocontrol ma tkunx f’kunflitt mal-liġi tal-Unjoni, b’mod partikolari mal-kompetenzi tal-UE, u li din ma tippreġudikax azzjoni futura tal-Unjoni.
 (7)Fl-istess laqgħa, il-Kummissjoni Permanenti tista’ tadotta deċiżjoni dwar is-servizzi ċentralizzati.
 (8)Din id-deċiżjoni hi mistennija tirreferi għall-finanzjament ta’ ċerti servizzi ċentralizzati. Bħalissa l-Unjoni ma għandhiex biżżejjed informazzjoni biex tevalwa s-sustanza ta’ tali deċiżjoni. Deċiżjoni bħal din tista’ tippreġudika l-attività futura tal-Eurocontrol u b’mod li jista’ jkun ta’ ħsara għall-attività tal-Unjoni f’dan il-qasam, b’mod partikolari fir-rigward tar-Riċerka dwar il-Ġestjoni tat-Traffiku bl-Ajru tal-Ajru Uniku Ewropew (SESAR). Għaldaqstant id-deċiżjoni dwar din il-kwistjoni għandha tiġi posposta.
 (9)Għalhekk għandha tiġi stabbilita l-pożizzjoni li trid tittieħed f’isem l-Unjoni fil-Kummissjoni Permanenti tal-Eurocontrol,
 IDDEĊIEDA KIF ĠEJ:
 Artikolu 1
 Il-pożizzjoni li jridu jieħdu l-Istati Membri f’isem l-Unjoni fil-Kummissjoni Permanenti tal-Eurocontrol dwar ir-rwol u l-kompiti tal-Eurocontrol u s-servizzi ċentralizzati, għandha tkun skont l-Anness.
 L-Istati Membri għandhom jaġixxu b’mod konġunt fl-interess tal-Unjoni.
 Artikolu 2
 Din id-Deċiżjoni tidħol fis-seħħ fil-jum tal-adozzjoni tagħha.
 Magħmul fi Brussell,
 Għall-Kunsill
 Il-President
 ---documentbreak---
 IL-KUMMISSJONI EWROPEA
 Brussell, 23.11.2015
 COM(2015) 805 final
 ANNESS
 tad-
 DEĊIŻJONI TAL-KUNSILL
 dwar il-pożizzjoni li trid tittieħed f’isem l-Unjoni Ewropea, fir-rigward tad-deċiżjonijiet li trid tadotta l-Kummissjoni Permanenti tal-Eurocontrol, dwar ir-rwoli u l-kompiti tal-Eurocontrol u dwar is-servizzi ċentralizzati
 ANNESS
 tad-
 DEĊIŻJONI TAL-KUNSILL
 dwar il-pożizzjoni li trid tittieħed f’isem l-Unjoni Ewropea, fir-rigward tad-deċiżjonijiet li trid tadotta l-Kummissjoni Permanenti tal-Eurocontrol, dwar ir-rwoli u l-kompiti tal-Eurocontrol u dwar is-servizzi ċentralizzati
 I. Ir-rwoli u l-kompiti tal-Eurocontrol
 L-Unjoni qed titlob li t-test propost dwar is-servizzi, ir-rwoli u l-kompiti tal-Eurocontrol ma jaffettwa bl-ebda mod il-kompetenzi tal-Unjoni u li ma jippreġudikax l-azzjoni futura tal-Unjoni. Meta l-kompiti speċifiċi jkunu attwalment imwettqa mill-Eurocontrol fi ħdan il-qafas ġuridiku tal-Unjoni fuq bażi temporanja, dawn ma għandhomx jiġu ppreżentati bħala kompiti indipendenti mid-deċiżjonijiet tal-Unjoni.
 Meta mqabbla mal-lista tar-rwoli u tal-kompiti tal-Eurocontrol, kif propost fl-anness tad-dokument ta' azzjoni CN-SG-6-2015 tal-Eurocontrol dwar ir-rwoli u l-kompiti tal-organizzazzjoni tas-16 ta’ Novembru 2015, l-Unjoni titlob il-bidliet li ġejjin:
 (1)Fir-rigward tal-Artikolu 2(1) dwar “Funzjonijiet u Servizzi”:
 (a)Ġestjoni tal-Fluss tat-Traffiku tal-Ajru Ċentrali;
 (b)Il-funzjonijiet tan-netwerk tal-ATM jekk mogħtija mill-f'isem l-Unjoni Ewropea;
 (c)Funzjonijiet Kompiti tal-ATM f'isem l-ICAO għar-Reġjun EUR/NAT;
 (d)L-istabbiliment, il-fatturazzjoni u l-ġbir ta’ Tariffi tan-Navigazzjoni bl-Ajru;
 (e)Il-forniment ta’ servizzi tat-traffiku tal-ajru fil-MUAC, soġġett għar-riżultati tad-diskussjonijiet bejn l-Istati Membri u l-Eurocontrol;
 (f)Il-funzjonijiet u s-servizzi ċentrali, bħal EAD, ARTAS/CAMOS, u servizzi ċentrali oħrajn li jistgħu jiġu fdati lilha mill-Kummissjoni Permanenti, bi qbil mal-Unjoni.
 (2)Fir-rigward tal-Artikolu 2(2) dwar ir-“Rwoli":
 (a)Fir-rigward tal-“Appoġġ”, it-tibdil għandu jkun kif ġej:
 i.Appoġġ lill-Istati Membri tagħha, lill-NSAs, lill-ANSPs u lil partijiet ikkonċernati rilevanti oħra;
 ii.Appoġġ lill-UE korpi inkluż l-għoti ta' speċjalizzazzjoni biex jiġu appoġġjati l-attivitajiet regolatorji f'konformitàskont il-Ftehim ta' Livell Għoli bejn l-UE u l-Eurocontrol tad-29 ta' Ottubru 2012 fuq it-talba ta' dawn il-korpi;
 iii.Jiġu ffaċilitati u promossi l-interessi Ewropej fi Stati li mhumiex membri tal-ECAC fi kwistjonijiet tal-ATM b’kooperazzjoni mill-qrib mal-Istati Membri tagħha, mal-ANSPs u mal-industrija tagħhom, u l-UE, ħlief għall-oqsma koperti mir-regoli tal-UE u b'kundizzjoni li jiġu rrispettati l-kompetenzi tal-UE;
 iv.Kontribuzzjoni għal SESAR (R&Ż, żamma u tnedija tal-Pjan Regolatorju tal-ATM) — billi tibni fuq l-ispeċjalizzazzjoni tal-ATM tagħha, il-kopertura pan-Ewropea tagħha, l-aspett ċivili-militari tagħha u r-rwol tal-ġestjoni tal-fluss ċentrali tan-netwerk, f’konformità mal-leġiżlazzjoni rilevanti tal-UE;
 v.Jiġu pprovduti faċilitajiet ta' riċerka u ta' simulazzjoni relatati, eż. għal SESAR, jitwettqu attivitajiet ta’ riċerka flimkien ma' SESAR u jsir tibdil fl-ispazju tal-ajru f’konformità mal-leġiżlazzjoni rilevanti tal-UE, fejn applikabbli;
 vi.L-għoti ta' taħriġ/edukazzjoni lill-organizzazzjonijiet tal-Istati Membri.
 (b)Fir-rigward tal-“Mekkaniżmi għall-kooperazzjoni”, it-tibdil għandu jkun kif ġej:
 i.Tiġi ffaċilitata u promossa l-koordinazzjoni ċivili-militari fuq l-iżviluppi ATM/ANS;
 ii.Jingħata appoġġ lill-Istati Membri fil-ħidma tal-ICAO, bil-kundizzjoni li jiġu rrispettati l-kompetenzi tal-UE;
 iiiIssir kooperazzjoni ma' reġjuni oħra fid-dinja, soġġetta għal ftehim mal-Istati Membri li jiżgura l-koordinazzjoni mal-UE;
 iv.Kooperazzjoni/koordinazzjoni internazzjonali (ICAO, FAA, NATO, eċċ.) f’isem l-Istati Membri tagħha, għajr l-Istati Membri tal-UE;
 v.Jingħata parir li mhumiex fl-UE fuq talba tagħhom stess, lil dawk l-Istati Membri li mhumiex Stati Membri tal-UE u li ma kkonkludewx ftehimiet mal-Unjoni, dwar kwistjonijiet ta' Sikurezza u Prestazzjoni tal-ATM, bl-użu ta' f'konformità mar-regoli tal-ICAO, b'koordinazzjoni mal-UE u bil-kundizzjoni li jiġu rrispettati l-kompetenzi tagħha regoli tal-UE u tal-EASA f'dan il-qasam biex jikkontribwixxu għat-tisħiħ tal-armonizzazzjoni, għas-sikuerzza, għall-effiċjenza operattiva u għall-ekonomiji ta' skala.;
 (c)Fir-rigward tal-“Informazzjoni u tad-dejta dwar l-ATM fil-livell pan-Ewropew” it-tibdil għandu jkun kif ġej:
 i.Il-ġbir u l-analiżi tad-dejta, li tista' tinkludi dejta tal-prestazzjoni, dejta tas-sikurezza, eċċ. (sabiex "jinżammu" s-sistemi u d-dejta b'appoġġ għall-ħidma regolatorja) għall-Istati li mhumiex Stati Membri tal-UE u, jekk dan il-kompitu jiġi kkonferit lilha mill-UE, għall-Istati Membri tal-UE;
 ii.L-analiżi u t-tfassil ta' rapporti (informazzjoni) dwar id-dejta miġbura (eż. ACE, PRR) għall-Istati li mhumiex Stati Membri tal-UE u, jekk dan il-kompitu jiġi kkonferit lilha mill-UE, għall-Istati Membri tal-UE;
 iii.Imexxu l-proċess ESSIP/LSSIP, jekk jiġi kkonferit mill-Unjoni Ewropea;
 iv., inkluż Ir-rappurtar lill-ICAO dwar l-implimentazzjoni ta’ Pjan ta’ Navigazzjoni bl-Ajru Globali (GANP) u tal-Aġġornamenti tal-Blokok tas-Sistemi tal-Avjazzjoni (ASBUs) u tiġi żgurata l-koordinazzjoni mal-mekkaniżmi ta’ rappurtar tal-UE bi ftehim mal-Unjoni Ewropea;
 v.Ġbir ta’ dejta dwar it-traffiku u l-għoti tal-previżjonijiet STATFOR.
 II Servizzi Ċentralizzati
 Il-pożizzjoni tal-Unjoni hija li d-deċiżjoni dwar is-Servizzi Ċentralizzati f'dan l-istadju għanda tiġi posposta.
 Bħalissa l-Unjoni ma għandhiex biżżejjed informazzjoni biex tevalwa s-sustanza ta' tali deċiżjoni. Deċiżjoni bħal din tista’ tippreġudika l-attività futura tal-Eurocontrol u b’mod li jista’ jkun ta’ ħsara għall-attività tal-Unjoni f’dan il-qasam, b’mod partikolari fir-rigward tar-Riċerka dwar il-Ġestjoni tat-Traffiku bl-Ajru tal-Ajru Uniku Ewropew (SESAR).


text:
 27.3.2014
 DE
 Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union
 L 92/5
 BESCHLUSS DES GEMEINSAMEN EWR-AUSSCHUSSES
 Nr. 181/2013
 vom 8. November 2013
 zur Änderung von Anhang I (Veterinärwesen und Pflanzenschutz) des EWR-Abkommens
 DER GEMEINSAME EWR-AUSSCHUSS —
 gestützt auf das Abkommen über den Europäischen Wirtschaftsraum (im Folgenden „EWR-Abkommen“), insbesondere auf Artikel 98,
 in Erwägung nachstehender Gründe:
 (1)
 Die Durchführungsverordnung (EU) Nr. 72/2013 der Kommission vom 25. Januar 2013 zur Änderung der Verordnungen (EG) Nr. 180/2008 und (EG) Nr. 737/2008 hinsichtlich des Zeitraums, für den bestimmte Laboratorien als EU-Referenzlaboratorien benannt sind (1), ist in das EWR-Abkommen aufzunehmen.
 (2)
 Dieser Beschluss betrifft veterinärrechtliche Vorschriften. Nach den sektoralen Anpassungen zu Anhang I des EWR-Abkommens gelten veterinärrechtliche Vorschriften nicht für Liechtenstein, solange Liechtenstein in das Abkommen zwischen der Europäischen Gemeinschaft und der Schweizerischen Eidgenossenschaft über den Handel mit landwirtschaftlichen Erzeugnissen einbezogen ist. Dieser Beschluss gilt daher nicht für Liechtenstein.
 (3)
 Anhang I des EWR-Abkommens sollte daher entsprechend geändert werden —
 HAT FOLGENDEN BESCHLUSS ERLASSEN:
 Artikel 1
 In Anhang I Kapitel I des EWR-Abkommens wird in Teil 3.2 unter Nummer 41 (Verordnung (EG) Nr. 737/2008 der Kommission) und in Teil 4.2 unter Nummer 90 (Verordnung (EG) Nr. 180/2008 der Kommission) folgender Gedankenstrich angefügt:
 „—
 32013 R 0072: Durchführungsverordnung (EU) Nr. 72/2013 der Kommission vom 25. Januar 2013 (ABl. L 26 vom 26.1.2013, S. 9)“.
 Artikel 2
 Der Wortlaut der Durchführungsverordnung (EU) Nr. 72/2013 in isländischer und norwegischer Sprache, der in der EWR-Beilage des Amtsblatts der Europäischen Union veröffentlicht wird, ist verbindlich.
 Artikel 3
 Dieser Beschluss tritt am 9. November 2013 in Kraft, sofern alle Mitteilungen nach Artikel 103 Absatz 1 des EWR-Abkommens vorliegen (2).
 Artikel 4
 Dieser Beschluss wird im EWR-Abschnitt und in der EWR-Beilage des Amtsblatts der Europäischen Union veröffentlicht.
 Geschehen zu Brüssel am 8. November 2013.
 Für den Gemeinsamen EWR-Ausschuss
 Der Vorsitzende
 Thórir IBSEN
 (1) ABl. L 26 vom 26.1.2013, S. 9.
 (2) Ein Bestehen verfassungsrechtlicher Anforderungen wurde nicht mitgeteilt.