text:
 12.7.2019
 EN
 Official Journal of the European Union
 L 187/3
 AGREEMENT
 between the European Union and the Swiss Confederation on the application of certain provisions of Council Decision 2008/615/JHA on the stepping up of cross-border cooperation, particularly in combating terrorism and cross-border crime, of Council Decision 2008/616/JHA on the implementation of Decision 2008/615/JHA on the stepping up of cross-border cooperation, particularly in combating terrorism and cross-border crime, and the Annex thereto, and of Council Framework Decision 2009/905/JHA on accreditation of forensic service providers carrying out laboratory activities
 THE EUROPEAN UNION,
 of the one part, and
 THE SWISS CONFEDERATION,
 of the other part,
 hereinafter jointly referred to as ‘the Contracting Parties’,
 WISHING to improve police and judicial cooperation between the Member States of the European Union and the Swiss Confederation, without prejudice to the rules protecting individual freedom,
 CONSIDERING that current relationships between the Contracting Parties, in particular the Agreement between the European Union, the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on the Swiss Confederation's association with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis (1), demonstrate close cooperation in the fight against crime,
 POINTING OUT the Contracting Parties' common interest in ensuring that police cooperation between the Member States of the European Union and the Swiss Confederation is carried out in a fast and efficient manner compatible with the basic principles of their national legal systems, and in compliance with the individual rights and principles of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, signed at Rome on 4 November 1950,
 RECOGNISING that Council Framework Decision 2006/960/JHA of 18 December 2006 on simplifying the exchange of information and intelligence between law enforcement authorities of the Member States of the European Union (2) already lays down rules whereby the law enforcement authorities of the Member States of the European Union and the Swiss Confederation may exchange existing information and intelligence expeditiously and effectively for the purpose of carrying out criminal investigations or criminal intelligence operations,
 RECOGNISING that, in order to stimulate international cooperation in the area of law enforcement, it is of fundamental importance that precise information can be exchanged swiftly and efficiently,
 RECOGNISING that the aim is to introduce procedures for promoting fast, efficient and inexpensive means of data exchange, and that, for the joint use of data, those procedures should be subject to accountability and should incorporate appropriate guarantees as to the accuracy and security of the data during transmission and storage as well as procedures for recording data exchange and restrictions on the use of information exchanged,
 POINTING OUT that this Agreement therefore contains provisions which are based on the main provisions of Council Decision 2008/615/JHA of 23 June 2008 on the stepping up of cross-border cooperation, particularly in combating terrorism and cross-border crime (3) and Council Decision 2008/616/JHA of 23 June 2008 on the implementation of Decision 2008/615/JHA on the stepping up of cross-border cooperation, particularly in combating terrorism and cross-border crime (4), and the Annex thereto, and of Council Framework Decision 2009/905/JHA of 30 November 2009 on Accreditation of forensic service providers carrying out laboratory activities (5), and which are designed to improve the exchange of information whereby Member States of the European Union and the Swiss Confederation grant one another access rights to their automated DNA analysis files, automated dactyloscopic identification systems and vehicle registration data,
 POINTING OUT that, in the case of data from national DNA analysis files and automated dactyloscopic identification systems, a hit/no hit system should enable the searching State, in a second step, to request specific related personal data from the State administering the file and, where necessary, to request further information through mutual assistance procedures, including those adopted pursuant to Council Framework Decision 2006/960/JHA,
 CONSIDERING that those provisions would considerably speed up existing procedures enabling Member States of the European Union and the Swiss Confederation to find out whether another State has the information it needs and, if so, which State,
 CONSIDERING that cross-border data comparison will open up a new dimension in crime fighting and that the information obtained by comparing data will open up new investigative approaches and thus play a crucial role in assisting States' law enforcement and judicial authorities,
 CONSIDERING that the rules are based on networking States' national databases,
 CONSIDERING that subject to certain conditions, States should be able to supply personal and non-personal data in order to improve the exchange of information with a view to preventing criminal offences and maintaining public order and security in connection with major events with a cross-border dimension,
 RECOGNISING that, in addition to improving the exchange of information, there is a need to regulate other forms of closer cooperation between police authorities, in particular by means of joint security operations (e.g. joint patrols),
 CONSIDERING that the hit/no hit system provides for a structure of comparing anonymous profiles, where additional personal data is exchanged only after a hit, the supply and receipt of which is governed by national law, including the legal assistance rules, and that this set-up guarantees an adequate system of data protection, it being understood that the supply of personal data to another State requires an adequate level of data protection on the part of the receiving State,
 CONSIDERING that the Swiss Confederation should bear the costs incurred by its own authorities in connection with the application of this Agreement,
 RECOGNISING that, as the accreditation of forensic service providers carrying out laboratory activities is an important step towards a safer and more effective exchange of forensic information, certain provisions of Council Framework Decision 2009/905/JHA should be complied with by the Swiss Confederation,
 CONSIDERING that the processing of personal data, pursuant to this Agreement, by the authorities of the Swiss Confederation for the purposes of the prevention, detection or investigation of terrorism and cross-border crime should be subject to a standard of protection of personal data under the national law of the Swiss Confederation which complies with Directive (EU) 2016/680 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data by competent authorities for the purposes of the prevention, investigation, detection or prosecution of criminal offences or the execution of criminal penalties, and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Council Framework Decision 2008/977/JHA (6),
 TAKING AS A BASIS the mutual confidence of the Member States of the European Union and the Swiss Confederation in the structure and operation of their legal systems,
 TAKING INTO ACCOUNT that, pursuant to the Agreement between the Swiss Confederation and the Principality of Liechtenstein referring to the cooperation in the framework of the Swiss information systems regarding dactyloscopic data and DNA profiles (7), both countries share the same database and information exchange systems regarding DNA and dactyloscopic data respectively,
 RECOGNISING that the provisions of bilateral and multilateral agreements remain applicable for all matters not covered by this Agreement,
 HAVE DECIDED TO CONCLUDE THIS AGREEMENT:
 Article 1
 Subject matter and purpose
 1. Subject to this Agreement, Articles 1 to 24, Article 25(1) and Articles 26 to 32 and 34 of Council Decision 2008/615/JHA on the stepping up of cross-border cooperation, particularly in combating terrorism and cross-border crime, shall be applicable in the bilateral relations between the Swiss Confederation and each of the Member States.
 2. Subject to this Agreement, Articles 1 to 19 and 21 of Council Decision 2008/616/JHA on the implementation of Decision 2008/615/JHA on the stepping up of cross-border cooperation, particularly in combating terrorism and cross-border crime, and the Annex thereto except point 1 of Chapter 4 thereof, shall be applicable in the bilateral relations between the Swiss Confederation and each of the Member States.
 3. The declarations made by Member States in accordance with Council Decisions 2008/615/JHA and 2008/616/JHA shall also be applicable in their bilateral relations with the Swiss Confederation.
 4. Subject to this Agreement, Articles 1 to 5 and Article 6(1) of Council Framework Decision 2009/905/JHA on accreditation of forensic service providers carrying out laboratory activities shall be applicable in the bilateral relations between the Swiss Confederation and each of the Member States.
 Article 2
 Definitions
 For the purposes of this Agreement, the following definitions apply:
 (1)
 ‘Contracting Parties’ means the European Union and the Swiss Confederation;
 (2)
 ‘Member State’ means a Member State of the European Union;
 (3)
 ‘State’ means a Member State or the Swiss Confederation.
 Article 3
 Uniform application and interpretation
 1. With a view to ensuring that the provisions referred to in Article 1 are applied and interpreted as uniformly as possible, the Contracting Parties shall keep under constant review the development of the case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union and of the competent courts of the Swiss Confederation relating to those provisions. To this end, a mechanism shall be set up to ensure the regular mutual exchange of such case-law.
 2. The Swiss Confederation shall be entitled to submit statements of case or written observations to the Court of Justice of the European Union in cases where a question has been referred to it by a court or tribunal of a Member State for a preliminary ruling concerning the interpretation of any provision referred to in Article 1.
 Article 4
 Dispute settlement
 Any dispute between the Swiss Confederation and a Member State regarding the interpretation or the application of this Agreement or of any of the provisions referred to in Article 1 and amendments thereto may be referred by a party to the dispute to a meeting of representatives of the governments of the Member States and of the Swiss Confederation, with a view to its speedy settlement.
 Article 5
 Amendments
 1. Where it is necessary to amend the provisions referred to in Article 1, the European Union shall inform the Swiss Confederation at the earliest possible occasion and collect any comments it may have.
 2. The Swiss Confederation shall be notified by the European Union of any amendment of the provisions referred to in Article 1 as soon as the amendment is adopted.
 The Swiss Confederation shall decide independently whether to accept the content of the amendment and whether to implement it into its internal legal order. That decision shall be notified to the European Union within three months of the date of the notification referred to in the first subparagraph.
 3. If the content of the amendment can be binding on the Swiss Confederation only after the fulfilment of constitutional requirements, the Swiss Confederation shall inform the European Union of this at the time of its notification. The Swiss Confederation shall promptly inform the European Union in writing upon fulfilment of all constitutional requirements. Where a referendum is not required, notification shall take place as soon as the referendum deadline expires. If a referendum is required, the Swiss Confederation shall have a maximum of two years from the date of the notification by the European Union within which to make its notification. From the date laid down for the entry into force of the amendment for the Swiss Confederation and until it has given notification that the constitutional requirements have been met, the Swiss Confederation shall, where possible, apply the content of the amendment on a provisional basis.
 4. If the Swiss Confederation does not accept the content of the amendment, this Agreement shall be suspended. A meeting of the Contracting Parties shall be convened to examine all further possibilities with a view to continuing the good functioning of this Agreement, including the possibility of a recognition of equivalence of legislation. Suspension shall be terminated as soon as the Swiss Confederation notifies its acceptance of the content of the amendment or if the Contracting Parties agree to reinstate the Agreement.
 5. If, after a period of six months of suspension, the Contracting Parties have not agreed to reinstate the Agreement, it shall cease to apply.
 6. Paragraphs 4 and 5 of this Article shall not apply to amendments relating to Chapters 3, 4 or 5 of Council Decision 2008/615/JHA or Article 17 of Council Decision 2008/616/JHA in respect of which the Swiss Confederation has notified the European Union that it does not accept the amendment, stating the reasons for its objection. In such cases, and without prejudice to Article 10 of this Agreement, the relevant provisions in their version prior to the amendment shall continue to be applicable in the bilateral relations between the Swiss Confederation and each of the Member States.
 Article 6
 Review
 The Contracting Parties agree to carry out a common review of this Agreement no later than five years after its entry into force. The review shall in particular address the practical implementation, interpretation and development of the Agreement and shall also include issues such as the consequences of the development of the European Union relating to the subject matter of this Agreement.
 Article 7
 Relationship with other instruments
 1. The Swiss Confederation may continue to apply bilateral or multilateral agreements or arrangements on cross-border cooperation with Member States that are in force on the date on which this Agreement is concluded in so far as such agreements or arrangements are not incompatible with the objectives of this Agreement. The Swiss Confederation shall notify the European Union of any such agreements or arrangements which will continue to apply.
 2. The Swiss Confederation may conclude or bring into force additional bilateral or multilateral agreements or arrangements on cross-border cooperation with Member States after this Agreement has entered into force in so far as such agreements or arrangements provide for the objectives of this Agreement to be extended or enlarged. The Swiss Confederation shall notify the European Union of any such new agreements or arrangements within three months of their signing or, in the case of agreements or arrangements that were signed before the entry into force of this Agreement, within three months of their entry into force.
 3. The agreements and arrangements referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 shall not affect relations with Member States that are not parties thereto.
 4. This Agreement shall be without prejudice to existing agreements on legal assistance or mutual recognition of court decisions.
 Article 8
 Notifications, declarations and entry into force
 1. The Contracting Parties shall notify each other of the completion of the procedures required to express their consent to be bound by this Agreement.
 2. The European Union may express its consent to be bound by this Agreement even if the decisions as regards the processing of personal data which are or have been supplied pursuant to Council Decision 2008/615/JHA have not yet been taken in respect of all the Member States.
 3. Article 5(1) and (2) shall apply on a provisional basis as from the time of signature of this Agreement.
 4. With respect to amendments to the provisions referred to in Article 1 adopted after the signature of this Agreement but before its entry into force, the period of three months referred to in the second subparagraph of Article 5(2) shall start to run from the date of entry into force of this Agreement.
 5. When giving its notification pursuant to paragraph 1 or, if so provided, at any time thereafter, the Swiss Confederation shall make the declarations referred to in Article 1(3).
 6. This Agreement shall enter into force on the first day of the third month following the date of the last notification pursuant to paragraph 1.
 7. The supply by Member States and the Swiss Confederation of personal data under this Agreement shall not take place until the provisions of Chapter 6 of Council Decision 2008/615/JHA have been implemented in the national law of the States involved in such supply.
 In order to verify whether this is the case for the Swiss Confederation, an evaluation visit and a pilot run shall be carried out in respect of, and under conditions and arrangements acceptable to, the Swiss Confederation, similar to those carried out in respect of Member States pursuant to Chapter 4 of the Annex to Council Decision 2008/616/JHA.
 On the basis of an overall evaluation report and following the same steps as for the launching of automated data exchanges in Member States, the Council shall determine the date or dates as from which personal data may be supplied by Member States to the Swiss Confederation pursuant to this Agreement.
 8. The provisions of Directive (EU) 2016/680 of the European Parliament and of the Council shall be implemented and applied by the Swiss Confederation. The Swiss Confederation shall communicate to the European Commission the text of the main provisions adopted in the field covered by that Directive.
 9. Articles 1 to 24, Article 25(1) and Articles 26 to 32 and 34 of Council Framework Decision 2009/905/JHA shall be implemented and applied by the Swiss Confederation. The Swiss Confederation shall communicate to the European Commission the text of the main provisions adopted in the field covered by that Council Framework Decision.
 10. The competent authorities of the Swiss Confederation shall not apply the provisions of Chapter 2 of Council Decision 2008/615/JHA until it has implemented and applied the measures referred to in paragraphs 8 and 9 of this Article.
 Article 9
 Accession of new Member States to the European Union
 The accession of new Member States to the European Union shall create rights and obligations under this Agreement between those new Member States and the Swiss Confederation.
 Article 10
 Termination
 1. This Agreement may be terminated at any time by one of the Contracting Parties by depositing a notification of termination to the other Contracting Party.
 2. Termination of this Agreement in accordance with paragraph 1 shall take effect six months after the deposit of the notification of termination.
 This Agreement shall be drawn up in duplicate in the Bulgarian, Croatian, Czech, Danish, Dutch, English, Estonian, Finnish, French, German, Greek, Hungarian, Italian, Latvian, Lithuanian, Maltese, Polish, Portuguese, Romanian, Slovak, Slovenian, Spanish and Swedish languages, each text being equally authentic.
 Съставено в Брюксел на двадесет и седми юни две хиляди и деветнадесета година.
 Hecho en Bruselas, el veintisiete de junio de dos mil diecinueve.
 V Bruselu dne dvacátého sedmého června dva tisíce devatenáct.
 Udfærdiget i Bruxelles den syvogtyvende juni to tusind og nitten.
 Geschehen zu Brüssel am siebenundzwanzigsten Juni zweitausendneunzehn.
 Kahe tuhande üheksateistkümnenda aasta juunikuu kahekümne seitsmendal päeval Brüsselis.
 Έγινε στις Βρυξέλλες, στις είκοσι εφτά Ιουνίου δύο χιλιάδες δεκαεννέα.
 Done at Brussels on the twenty seventh day of June in the year two thousand and nineteen.
 Fait à Bruxelles, le vingt sept juin deux mille dix-neuf.
 Sastavljeno u Bruxellesu dvadeset sedmog lipnja godine dvije tisuće devetnaeste.
 Fatto a Bruxelles, addì ventisette giugno duemiladiciannove.
 Briselē, divi tūkstoši deviņpadsmitā gada divdesmit septītajā jūnijā.
 Priimta du tūkstančiai devynioliktų metų birželio dvidešimt septintą dieną Briuselyje.
 Kelt Brüsszelben, a kétezer-tizenkilencedik év június havának huszonhetedik napján.
 Magħmul fi Brussell, fis-sebgħa u għoxrin jum ta’ Ġunju fis-sena elfejn u dsatax.
 Gedaan te Brussel, zevenentwintig juni tweeduizend negentien.
 Sporządzono w Brukseli dnia dwudziestego siódmego czerwca roku dwa tysiące dziewiętnastego.
 Feito em Bruxelas, em vinte e sete de junho de dois mil e dezanove.
 Întocmit la Bruxelles la douăzeci și șapte iunie două mii nouăsprezece.
 V Bruseli dvadsiateho siedmeho júna dvetisícdevätnásť.
 V Bruslju, dne sedemindvajsetega junija leta dva tisoč devetnajst.
 Tehty Brysselissä kahdentenakymmenentenäseitsemäntenä päivänä kesäkuuta vuonna kaksituhattayhdeksäntoista.
 Som skedde i Bryssel den tjugosjunde juni år tjugohundranitton.
 За Европейския съюз
 Рог la Unión Europea
 Za Evropskou unii
 For Den Europæiske Union
 Für die Europäische Union
 Euroopa Liidu nimel
 Για την Ευρωπαϊκή Ένωση
 For the European Union
 Pour l'Union européenne
 Za Europsku uniju
 Per l'Unione europea
 Eiropas Savienības vārdā –
 Europos Sąjungos vardu
 Az Európai Unió részéről
 Għall-Unjoni Ewropea
 Voor de Europese Unie
 W imieniu Unii Europejskiej
 Pela União Europeia
 Pentru Uniunea Europeană
 Za Európsku úniu
 Za Evropsko unijo
 Euroopan unionin puolesta
 För Europeiska unionen
 За Конфедерация Швейцария
 Por la Confederación Suiza
 Za Švýcarskou konfederaci
 For Det Schweiziske Forbund
 Für die Schweizerische Eidgenossenschaft
 Šveitsi Konföderatsiooni nimel
 Για την Ελβετική Συνομοσπονδία
 For the Swiss Confederation
 Pour la Confédération suisse
 Za Švicarsku Konfederaciju
 Per la Confederazione Svizzera
 Šveices Konfederācijas vārdā –
 Šveicarijos Konfederacijos vardu
 A Svájci Államszövetség részéről
 Għall-Konfederazzjoni Żvizzera
 Voor de Zwitserse Bondsstaat
 W imieniu Konfederacji Szwajcarskiej
 Pela Confederação Suíça
 Pentru Confederația Elvețiană
 Za Švajčiarsku konfederáciu
 Za Švicarsko konfederacijo
 Sveitsin valaliiton puolesta
 För Schweiziska edsförbundet
 (1) OJ EU L 53, 27.2.2008, p. 52.
 (2) OJ EU L 386, 29.12.2006, p. 89.
 (3) OJ EU L 210, 6.8.2008, p. 1.
 (4) OJ EU L 210, 6.8.2008, p. 12.
 (5) OJ EU L 322, 9.12.2009, p. 14.
 (6) OJ EU L 119, 4.5.2016, p. 89.
 (7) Swiss official compilation AS/RO 2006 2031; Swiss classified compilation SR/RS 0.360.514.1.
 Declaration of the Contracting Parties at the occasion of the signature of the Agreement
 The European Union and the Swiss Confederation, Contracting Parties of the Agreement on the application of certain provisions of Council Decision 2008/615/JHA on the stepping up of cross-border cooperation, particularly in combating terrorism and cross-border crime, of Council Decision 2008/616/JHA on the implementation of Decision 2008/615/JHA on the stepping up of cross-border cooperation, particularly in combating terrorism and cross-border crime, and the Annex thereto, and of Council Framework Decision 2009/905/JHA on accreditation of forensic service providers carrying out laboratory activities (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’), declare:
 The implementation of the DNA, dactyloscopic and vehicle registration data exchange pursuant to the Agreement will require that the Swiss Confederation set up bilateral connections for each of these data categories with each of the Member States.
 To enable and facilitate this work, the Swiss Confederation will be provided with all the available documentation, software products and contact lists.
 The Swiss Confederation will have the opportunity to set up an informal partnership with Member States that have already implemented such data exchange, with a view to sharing experiences and getting practical and technical support. The details of such partnerships are to be arranged in direct contacts with the Member States concerned.
 The Swiss experts can contact at any time the Presidency of the Council, the European Commission or leading experts in these matters to obtain information, clarification or any other support. Similarly the Commission will, whenever in preparation of proposals or communications it contacts representatives of the Member States, avail itself of the opportunity to contact also representatives of the Swiss Confederation.
 Swiss experts may be invited to attend meetings where Member States' experts discuss within the Council technical aspects which are directly relevant to the proper application and development of the content of the aforementioned Council Decisions.


type: legislation

jurisdiction: EU

text:
 1.6.2013
 DA
 Den Europæiske Unions Tidende
 L 147/1
 KOMMISSIONENS GENNEMFØRELSESFORORDNING (EU) Nr. 504/2013
 af 31. maj 2013
 om ændring af gennemførelsesforordning (EU) nr. 1225/2011 for så vidt angår meddelelse af oplysninger om afgiftsfritagelse
 EUROPA-KOMMISSIONEN HAR —
 under henvisning til traktaten om Den Europæiske Unions funktionsmåde,
 under henvisning til Rådets forordning (EF) nr. 1186/2009 af 16. november 2009 om en fællesskabsordning vedrørende fritagelse for import- og eksportafgifter (1) og
 ud fra følgende betragtninger:
 (1)
 I henhold til artikel 17 i Kommissionens gennemførelsesforordning (EU) nr. 1225/2011 af 28. november 2011 til artikel 42 til 52 og artikel 57 og 58 i Rådets forordning (EF) nr. 1186/2009 om en fællesskabsordning vedrørende fritagelse for import- og eksportafgifter (2) skal medlemsstaterne videregive oplysninger til Kommissionen om afgiftsfritagelse på visse reservedele, dele, tilbehør, værktøj og udstyr, hvis toldværdi eller pris overstiger en vis værdi. Kommissionen skal videregive oplysningerne til medlemsstaterne. I henhold til den nævnte gennemførelsesforordnings artikel 18 gennemgås oplysningerne regelmæssigt i Toldkodeksudvalget.
 (2)
 I henhold til artikel 20 i gennemførelsesforordning (EU) nr. 1225/2011 skal visse oplysninger, der er anført i ansøgningerne om afgiftsfritagelse på varer, der indføres af eller på vegne af videnskabelige institutioner eller organer, som er etableret i Unionen, fremsendes til Kommissionen af de medlemsstater, som har fået forelagt ansøgningen.
 (3)
 Disse forpligtelser, som stammer fra 1983, er ikke længere nødvendige af hensyn til en god forvaltning af import med afgiftsfritagelse. Desuden indebærer de en unødvendig administrativ byrde for både medlemsstaterne og Kommissionen. Af hensyn til en forenkling af lovgivningen og overskueligheden bør de tilsvarende bestemmelser derfor udgå eller forenkles.
 (4)
 Gennemførelsesforordning (EU) nr. 1225/2011 bør derfor ændres i overensstemmelse hermed.
 (5)
 Foranstaltningerne i denne forordning er i overensstemmelse med udtalelse fra Toldkodeksudvalget —
 VEDTAGET DENNE FORORDNING:
 Artikel 1
 I gennemførelsesforordning (EU) nr. 1225/2011 foretages følgende ændringer:
 1)
 Kapitel VII udgår.
 2)
 Artikel 20 affattes således:
 »Artikel 20
 Den kompetente myndighed i den medlemsstat, hvor modtagerinstitutionen eller -organet er beliggende, træffer umiddelbart afgørelse om den i artikel 19 omhandlede anmodning i alle tilfælde.«
 Artikel 2
 Denne forordning træder i kraft på tyvendedagen efter offentliggørelsen i Den Europæiske Unions Tidende.
 Denne forordning er bindende i alle enkeltheder og gælder umiddelbart i hver medlemsstat.
 Udfærdiget i Bruxelles, den 31. maj 2013.
 På Kommissionens vegne
 José Manuel BARROSO
 Formand
 (1) EUT L 324 af 10.12.2009, s. 23.
 (2) EUT L 314 af 29.11.2011, s. 20.


type: contracts

text:
 Avis juridique important
 |
 22001A1227(01)
 Tilläggsprotokoll om anpassing av handelsapekterna av stabiliserings- och associeringsavtalet mellan europeiska gemenskaperna och deras medlemsstater, å ena sidan, och f.d. jugoslaviska republiken Makedonien, å andra sidan, för att beakta resultaten av förhandlingarna mellan parterna om ömsesidiga förmånsmedgivanden för vissa viner, ömsesidigt erkännande och skydd och ömsesidig kontroll av namn på viner samt ömsesidigt erkännanade och skydd och ömsesidig kontroll av beteckningar för spritdrycker och aromatiserade drycker
 Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning nr L 342 , 27/12/2001 s. 0009 - 0010
 Tilläggsprotokollom anpassing av handelsapekterna av stabiliserings- och associeringsavtalet mellan europeiska gemenskaperna och deras medlemsstater, å ena sidan, och f.d. jugoslaviska republiken Makedonien, å andra sidan, för att beakta resultaten av förhandlingarna mellan parterna om ömsesidiga förmånsmedgivanden för vissa viner, ömsesidigt erkännande och skydd och ömsesidig kontroll av namn på viner samt ömsesidigt erkännanade och skydd och ömsesidig kontroll av beteckningar för spritdrycker och aromatiserade dryckerEUROPEISKA GEMENSKAPEN, nedan kallad gemenskapen,å ena sidan,ochF.D. JUGOSLAVISKA REPUBLIKEN MAKEDONIEN, nedan kallad "f.d. jugoslaviska republiken Makedonien",å andra sidan,nedan kallade "de avtalsslutande parterna",SOM BEAKTAR att Stabiliserings- och associeringsavtalet mellan Europeiska gemenskaperna och deras medlemsstater, å ena sidan, och f.d. jugoslaviska republiken Makedonien, å andra sidan, undertecknades genom skriftväxling i Luxemburg den 9 april 2001,SOM BEAKTAR att det i artikel 27.4 i Stabiliserings- och associeringsavtalet anges att det återstår att förhandla fram ett avtal om vin och spritdrycker,SOM BEAKTAR att ett interimsavtal kommer att säkra utvecklingen av handelsförbindelser genom kontraktsmässiga förhållanden och bidra till tillämpningen av Stabiliserings- och associeringsavtalet om handel och handelrelaterade frågor, som trädde i kraft den 1 juni 2001. I artikel 14.4 i interimsavtalet upprepas åtagandet om ett särskilt avtal för vin och spritdrycker,SOM BEAKTAR att förhandlingar mellan parterna inleddes och avslutades på denna grund,SOM BEAKTAR att avtalet om vin och spritdrycker bör införlivas i stabiliserings- och associeringsavtalet i form av ett protokoll så att överensstämmelse med den övergripande stabiliseringsprocessen garanteras,SOM BEAKTAR att detta protokoll om viner och spritdrycker bör träda i kraft samma dag som stabiliserings- och associeringsavtalet.SOM BEAKTAR att protokollet i detta syfte bör börja tillämpas så fort som möjligt,SOM ÖNSKAR förbättra handelsvillkoren för viner, spritdrycker och aromatiserade drycker på sina respektive marknader på grundval av principerna om kvalitet, ömsesidiga fördelar och ömsesidighet,SOM BEAKTAR att båda avtalsslutande parter är intresserade av ömsesidigt skydd och kontroll av namn på viner, beteckningar på spritdrycker och aromatiserade drycker,HAR ENATS OM FÖLJANDE.Artikel 1Detta protokoll omfattar följande:1. Ett avtal om ömsesidiga handelsmedgivanden på förmånsbasis för vissa viner (bilaga 1 till detta protokoll).2. Ett avtal om ömsesidigt erkännande och skydd och ömsesidig kontroll av namn på viner (bilaga 2 till detta protokoll).3. Ett avtal om ömsesidigt erkännande och skydd och ömsesidig kontroll av beteckningar på spritdrycker och aromatiserade drycker (bilaga 3 till detta protokoll).Den förteckning som avses i artikel 5 i det avtal som avses i punkt 2 och i artikel 5 i det avtal som avses i punkt 3 skall fastställas vid ett senare tillfälle och godkännas enligt det förfarande som föreskrivs i artiklarna 13 och 14 i respektive avtal.Artikel 2Detta protokoll och dess bilagor skall utgöra en integrerad del av stabiliserings- och associeringsavtalet.Artikel 3Detta protokoll skall godkännas av gemenskapen och f.d. jugoslaviska republiken Makedonien i enlighet med deras egna förfaranden. De avtalsslutande parterna skall vidta nödvändiga åtgärder för genomförandet av protokollet.De avtalsslutande parterna skall enligt artikel 3 första stycket meddela varandra när förfarandena avslutats.Artikel 4Detta protokoll skall träda i kraft samma dag som Stabiliserings- och associeringsavtalet.Artikel 5Detta protokoll skall upprättas i två exemplar på vart och ett av de avtalsslutande parternas officiella språk. Alla dessa texter äger samma giltighet.


text:
 9.12.2015
 MT
 Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali tal-Unjoni Ewropea
 L 323/29
 DEĊIŻJONI Nru 2/2015 TAL-KUMITAT KONĠUNT GĦALL-AGRIKOLTURA
 tad-19 ta' Novembru 2015
 dwar l-emenda tal-Appendiċijiet 1 u 2 tal-Anness 9 għall-Ftehim bejn il-Komunità Ewropea u l-Konfederazzjoni Żvizzera dwar il-kummerċ ta' prodotti agrikoli [2015/2292]
 IL-KUMITAT KONĠUNT GĦALL-AGRIKOLTURA,
 Wara li kkunsidra l-Ftehim bejn il-Komunità Ewropea u l-Konfederazzjoni Żvizzera dwar il-kummerċ tal-prodotti agrikoli, u b'mod partikulari l-Artikolu 11 tiegħu,
 Billi:
 (1)
 Il-Ftehim bejn il-Komunità Ewropea u l-Konfederazzjoni Żvizzera dwar il-kummerċ ta' prodotti agrikoli (minn hawn 'il quddiem “il-Ftehim”) daħal fis-seħħ fl-1 ta' Ġunju 2002.
 (2)
 L-Anness 9 tal-Ftehim għandu l-għan li jiffaċilita u jippromwovi l-flussi kummerċjali bilaterali tal-prodotti organiċi li ġejjin mill-Unjoni Ewropea u mill-Iżvizzera.
 (3)
 Skont l-Artikolu 8 tal-Anness 9 tal-Ftehim, il-grupp ta' ħidma dwar “prodotti organiċi” għandu jeżamina kull kwistjoni marbuta mal-Anness 9 u mal-implimentazzjoni tiegħu, u jfassal rakkomandazzjonijiet lill-Kumitat Konġunt għall-Agrikoltura. Dan il-grupp iltaqa' biex jeżamina b'mod partikolari l-applikazzjoni tal-Anness. Hemm il-ħtieġa li jiġi emendat il-kamp ta' applikazzjoni tal-Anness 9 dwar l-inbid u l-ħmira għal raġunijiet ta' ekwivalenza bejn id-dispożizzjonijiet Żvizzeri u dawk tal-Unjoni Ewropea. Minbarra dan, jirriżulta li l-kontenut tal-Appendiċi 2 ma għadux validu, għaliex l-Iżvizzera emendat il-leġiżlazzjoni tagħha f'dak li jirrigwarda l-metodu organiku ta' produzzjoni għall-alimentazzjoni tal-annimali, u adottat id-dispożizzjonijiet li huma konformi mal-liġi Ewropea. Il-grupp ta' ħidma rrakkomanda lill-Kumitat biex jadotta l-Appendiċi tal-Anness 9.
 (4)
 Għaldaqstant, l-Appendiċijiet 1 u 2 tal-Anness 9 għandhom jiġu emendati.
 IDDEĊIEDA KIF ĠEJ:
 Artikolu 1
 L-Appendiċijiet 1 u 2 tal-Anness 9 tal-Ftehim bejn il-Komunità Ewropea u l-Konfederazzjoni Żvizzera dwar il-kummerċ fil-prodotti agrikoli għandhom jinbidlu bit-test li jinsab fl-Anness ta' din id-Deċiżjoni.
 Artikolu 2
 Din id-Deċiżjoni għandha tidħol fis-seħħ fil-31 ta' Diċembru 2015.
 Magħmul f'Bern, id-19 ta' Novembru 2015.
 Għall-Kumitat Konġunt għall-Agrikoltura
 Il-Kap tad-Delegazzjoni tal-Unjoni Ewropea
 Susana MARAZUELA-AZPIROZ
 Il-President u l-Kap tad-Delegazzjoni Żvizzera
 Adrian AEBI
 Is-Segretarju tal-Kumitat
 Thomas MAIER
 ANNESS
 “
 APPENDIĊI 1
 Lista ta' atti msemmija fl-Artikolu 3 dwar il-prodotti agrikoli u oġġetti tal-ikel miksubin b'mod organiku
 Dispożizzjonijiet regolamentari applikabbli fl-Unjoni Ewropea
 Ir-Regolament tal-Kunsill (KE) Nru 834/2007 tat-28 ta' Ġunju 2007 dwar il-produzzjoni organika u t-tikkettar ta' prodotti organiċi u li jemenda r-Regolament (KEE) Nru 2092/91 (ĠU L 189, 20.7.2007, p. 1) kif emendat l-aħħar bir-Regolament tal-Kunsill (UE) Nru 517/2013 tat-13 ta' Mejju 2013 (ĠU L 158, 10.6.2013, p. 1),
 Ir-Regolament tal-Kummissjoni (KE) Nru 889/2008 tal-5 ta' Settembru 2008 li jistabbilixxi regoli dettaljati għall-implimentazzjoni tar-Regolament tal-Kunsill (KE) Nru 834/2007 dwar il-produzzjoni organika u t-tikkettar ta' prodotti organiċi fir-rigward tal-produzzjoni, it-tikkettar u l-kontroll organiku (ĠU L 250, 18.9.2008, p. 1), kif emendat l-aħħar bir-Regolament ta' Implimentazzjoni tal-Kummissjoni (UE) Nru 1358/2014 tat-18 ta' Diċembru 2014 (ĠU L 365, 19.12.2014, p. 97),
 Ir-Regolament tal-Kummissjoni (KE) Nru 1235/2008 tat-8 ta' Diċembru 2008 li jistabbilixxi r-regoli dettaljati għall-implimentazzjoni tar-Regolament tal-Kunsill (KE) Nru 834/2007 dwar l-arranġamenti għall-importazzjonijiet ta' prodotti organiċi minn pajjiżi terzi (ĠU L 334, 12.12.2008, p. 25), kif emendat l-aħħar bir-Regolament ta' Implimentazzjoni tal-Kummissjoni (UE) 2015/131 tat-23 ta' Jannar 2015 (ĠU L 23, 29.1.2015, p. 1).
 Dispożizzjonijiet applikabbli fil-Konfederazzjoni Żvizzera
 Ordinanza tat-22 ta' Settembru 1997 dwar l-agrikoltura organika u d-deskrizzjoni tal-prodotti u l-oġġetti tal-ikel organiċi (Ordinanza dwar l-agrikoltura organika), emendata fid-29 ta' Ottubru 2014 (RO 2014 3969),
 Ordinanza tad-Dipartiment Federali tal-Ekonomija tat-22 ta' Settembru 1997 dwar l-agrikoltura organika, emendata fid-29 ta' Ottubru 2014 (RO 2014 3979).
 Esklużjoni mill-arranġamenti ta' ekwivalenza
 Prodotti Żvizzeri bbażati fuq ingredjenti prodotti fil-qafas tal-arranġamenti għall-konverżjoni lejn agrikoltura organika
 Prodotti li ġejjin mit-trobbija tal-mogħoż fl-Isvizzera meta l-annimali jibbenefikaw mid-deroga prevista fl-Artikolu 39d tal-Ordinanza dwar l-agrikoltura organika u d-deskrizzjoni tal-prodotti u tal-oġġetti tal-ikel organiċi (*).
 APPENDIĊI 2
 Regolamenti ta' implimentazzjoni
 Mhux applikabbli
 ”
 (*) (RS 910.18)


text:
 Avis juridique important
 |
 52001PC0045(01)
 Förslag till rådets beslut om undertecknande av avtalet mellan Europeiska gemenskapen och Rumänien om fastställande av vissa villkor för godstransporter på väg och om främjandet av kombinerade transporter /* KOM/2001/0045 slutlig - AVC 2001/0032 */
 Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning nr 154 E , 29/05/2001 s. 0226 - 0226
 Förslag till RÅDETS BESLUT om undertecknande av avtalet mellan Europeiska gemenskapen och Rumänien om fastställande av vissa villkor för godstransporter på väg och om främjandet av kombinerade transporter(framlagda av Komissionen)MOTIVERINGA. Allmän bakgrund1. Den 7 december 1995 bemyndigade rådet kommissionen att med Ungern, Rumänien och Bulgarien förhandla om ett eller flera avtal om vägtransit för att lösa problemet angående godstransporter på väg i relationerna mellan Grekland och de övriga medlemsstaterna, framför allt genom ett ömsesidigt utbyte av vägtransittillstånd. I avtalet skulle man också ange villkoren för transporter som sker inom ramen för ett sådant avtal, framför allt vad gäller avgifter för transport och användning av vägar. Avtalet skulle allmänt sett innebära att lagstiftningen om vägtransporter i partnerstaterna harmoniseras med gemenskapens lagstiftning och att de administrativa frågorna om vägtransit samordnas. Dessutom skulle avtalet främja kombinerade landtransporter i enlighet med gemenskapens bestämmelser.2. I början av förhandlingarna söktes ett multilateralt avtal, men det visade sig omöjligt att tillgodose samtliga tre partnerstaters intressen genom ett sådant multilateralt avtal. Därför beslöt man att sluta separata avtal med var och en av dessa parnerstater. Dessa avtal kommer automatiskt att upphöra då parnerstaterna ansluter sig till Europeiska unionen.3. Medlemsstaterna deltog som observatörer vid alla förhandlingar med Bulgarien, Ungern och Rumänien. Kommissionen höll också ett antal tekniska möten med företrädare för dessa partnerstater. Före förhandlingarna fördes det diskussioner med medlemsstaterna i rådet. Kommissionen överlämnade i alla skeden kopior på utkasten till avtal till rådets särskilda kommitté som upprättats för dessa förhandlingar och anordnade också separata möten med experter från medlemsstaterna angående vissa tekniska aspekter av avtalet, till exempel utformningen av de tillstånd som skall utbytas inom ramen för avtalen.4. På grundval av de förhandlingsdirektiv som antogs av rådet och de efterföljande diskussionerna i den särskilda kommittén, undertecknade delegationscheferna ett utkast till avtal med Bulgarien den 4 december 1998 och ett utkast till avtal med Ungern den 8 april 1999. Utkastet till avtal med Rumänien undertecknades den 26 oktober 2000. Ordalydelsen i alla de tre avtalen är nästan densamma. De skillnader som finns mellan avtalen återspeglar inte skillnader i sak, utan snarare hur förhandlingsparterna vill att avtalen skall utformas.5. Den 10 december 1999 antog kommissionen förslag till rådets beslut om undertecknande och slutande av avtal mellan Europeiska gemenskapen och Ungern respektive Bulgarien. Avtalet med Ungern undertecknades den 12 juli 2000 och avtalet med Bulgarien undertecknades den 26 juli 2000. Man väntas sluta avtalen före utgången av år 2001.B. Avtalens innehållB.1. Tillstånd6. Avtalet med Rumänien liksom de nästan identiska avtal som redan undertecknats med Bulgarien och Ungern underlättar transittrafiken genom de avtalsslutande parternas territorier, framför allt genom ett ömsesidigt utbyte av transittillstånd för godstransporter på väg. Dessa tillstånd tillkommer vid sidan av dem som redan utbytts enligt bilaterala avtal mellan enskilda medlemsstater å den ena sidan och Rumänien å den andra. Bestämmelserna i befintliga avtal mellan medlemsstaterna och Rumänien behålls således. Detta innebär att till exempel transporttyperna eller fordonskategorierna för vilka ett transportföretag i en medlemsstat behöver ett transittillstånd för Rumänien även i fortsättningen kommer att regleras av de bilaterala avtal som ingåtts mellan det land där transportföretaget har sitt säte och Rumänien.7. De transportföretag i medlemsstaterna som behöver ett transittillstånd för en viss utresa och återresa antingen genom Rumänien kan således använda ett av de tillstånd som utbytts enligt detta gemenskapsavtal. Alternativt kan ett transportföretag i gemenskapen till exempel använda ett tillstånd som utbytts enligt ett bilateralt avtal mellan det land där företaget har sitt säte och Rumänien. På samma sätt kan transportföretag från Rumänien använda ett gemenskapstillstånd för att transitera ett antal enskilda medlemsstater med en enskild ut- och återresa till och från eller genom gemenskapens territorium. Alternativt kan de till exempel använda tillstånd som utbytts enligt tillämpliga bilaterala avtal med enskilda medlemsstater.8. Medan gemenskapen i princip erbjuder möjligheten att transitera alla femton medlemsstaters territorier, erbjuder partnerstaten i utbyte endast transittrafik på landets egna territorium, dvs. i en enda stat. Det är därför rimligt att gemenskapen i utbyte får ett betydligt större antal tillstånd från Rumänien. Det måste dock göras en anpassning eftersom inget transportföretag i Rumänien någonsin på en enda resa kommer att transitera alla femton medlemsstater. Vissa medlemsstaters geografiska läge hindrar eller innebär att det är osannolikt att det kommer att ske transittrafik på deras territorier. Dessutom begränsade gemenskapen från början antalet transittillstånd för varje partnerstat till 7 000 tillstånd av vilka inte mer än 3 000 skulle vara giltiga i vilken medlemsstat som helst. Förhandlingsparterna ansåg det därför rimligt att gemenskapen skulle få minst dubbelt så många tillstånd.9. Resultatet av förhandlingarna är att gemenskapen varje år kommer att få 14 000 tillstånd per år från Rumänien. Varje enskilt tillstånd kommer att vara giltigt för transit för en ut- och återresa. Fördelningen av dessa tillstånd bland medlemsstaterna, vilka kommer att ansvara för att utfärda dem till transportföretagen, kommer att fastställas i en separat rådsförordning.10. Varje år kommer Rumänien att i utbyte från gemenskapen få 7 000 "tomma tillstånd" som kommer att vara giltiga för transit för en ut- och återresa och 3 000 självhäftande märken för varje medlemsstat. Transportföretaget i Rumänien skall på förhand bekräfta valet av transitväg (dvs. vilken medlemsstat som transiteras på en resa) genom att på varje tillstånd fästa självhäftande märken avseende den aktuella medlemsstaten. Tillståndet innebär att transportföretaget från Rumänien kommer att ha rätt att för både utresan och återresan transitera den eller de medlemsstater vars märke är fästat på tillståndet. Detta ger transportföretagen i Rumänien största möjliga flexibilitet när det gäller att anpassa transitvägen efter egna behov. Ett transportföretag från Rumänien som använder gemenskapens transittillstånd och som önskar lasta eller lossa i en medlemsstat kommer fortfarande att behöva ett separat tillstånd för denna trafik enligt det bilaterala avtal som ingåtts mellan Rumänien och den medlemsstat där lastningen eller lossningen kommer att äga rum.11. Kommissionens avdelningar kommer att tillhandahålla både medlemsstaterna och Rumänien alla tillstånd och självhäftande märken. Staterna kommer sedan att utfärda dessa till sina transportföretag mot en avgift som endast skall täcka skäliga administrativa kostnader. Själva användningen av tillstånden kommer att vara gratis. Tillståndet kan endast användas av fordon som överensstämmer med Euro I-standarderna.B.2. Infrastrukturavgifter12. Det har ibland tagits ut alltför höga, ofta diskriminerande, skatter och skatteliknande avgifter för den transportverksamhet som bedrivs i Östeuropa. Nya avgifter eller avgiftsökningar har ofta införts med mycket kort varsel utan att tillräcklig information eller tillräckliga varningar lämnats till gemenskapens transportföretag om exakt vilka bestämmelser som kommer att gälla.13. För att ovannämnda svårigheter skall kunna undvikas fastställs i dessa avtal ett antal bestämmelser angående vilken typ av avgifter som kan tas ut för transporter som bedrivs enligt detta avtal. Dessa bestämmelser utgörs av både aktuella principer och bestämmelser i gemenskapens regelverk. Detta innebär i princip att endast icke-diskriminerande vägavgifter eller tullar för infrastrukturanvändning kan tas ut och att det inte kan tas ut särskilda skatter eller avgifter för transporterna i sig.14. I Östeuropa är gränserna för högsta tillåtna vikt och axeltryck ofta betydligt lägre än i gemenskapen. Detta återspeglas också ofta av statusen på infrastrukturen i Östeuropa som har byggts enligt mycket lägre standarder. Tunga fordon som motsvarar gemenskapens standarder, till exempel ett fordon med en högsta tillåten vikt på 40 ton, ett axeltryck på den drivande axeln på 11,5 ton och en längd på 18,75 meter kommer i allmänhet att överskrida de tillåtna gränserna i Östeuropa vad gäller vikt och dimensioner och kommer på grund av detta att tvingas att betala ytterligare avgifter som grundas på de ytterligare skador som de orsakar på infrastrukturen.15. Det accepteras i allmänhet att den övervägande dåliga tekniska standarden på infrastrukturen i Östeuropa fortfarande gör det omöjligt att fullt ut tillämpa gemenskapens regelverk om högsta tillåtna vikter och dimensioner på vägfordon i internationell trafik. För närvarande har dock betydande medel, bland annat från gemenskapen, anslagits för att förbättra huvudvägarna i partnerstaterna. Kommissionen har därför beslutat att i förhandlingarna försöka få till stånd att gemenskapsfordon som används inom ramen för dessa tre avtal med Ungern, Bulgarien och Rumänien inte skall behöva betala särskilda avgifter för överskriden tillåten totalvikt, när de uppfyller gemenskapens normer för vikt och dimensioner och körs på särskilda förbättrade transitvägar i partnerstaten. Avgifterna skulle således grundas på den faktiska tekniska standarden på ett visst vägavsnitt där kanske ett tryck på den drivande axeln på 11,5 ton kan tillåtas även om den allmänna gränsen för trycket på den drivande axeln när det gäller hela huvudnätet fortfarande skulle vara lägre. Detta skulle medföra betydande besparingar för gemenskapens transportföretag eftersom staterna i Östeuropa nu vanligtvis tar ut avgifter för fordon som överskrider de allmänna viktgränser som fastställts för hela huvudnätet, även om vissa avsnitt redan har förbättrats med hänsyn till gemenskapens högre normer.16. I detta avtal med Rumänien fastställs uttryckligen att det på vissa transitsträckor i Rumänien på vägen mellan Grekland och de övriga delarna av gemenskapen inte skall tas ut särskilda avgifter för övervikt för gemenskapsfordon som överensstämmer med gemenskapens standarder. På de förbättrade avsnitten av dessa transitsträckor, vilka anges i bilagan till avtalen, skall Rumänien således undanta fordon som körs enligt detta avtal från särskilda avgifter för övervikt. Eftersom vägnätet kontinuerligt förbättras kommer det i avtalen att vara möjligt att utöka den förteckning över förbättrade vägar som återfinns i bilagan till avtalet. Detta avtal har inte några direkta konsekvenser för gemenskapens budget.B.3. Harmonisering av lagstiftning17. I avtalet finns ett antal relevanta bestämmelser från gemenskapens regelverk som gäller tekniska standarder för fordon. Dessa bestämmelser kommer att antas av Rumänien, tillsammans med annan lagstiftning om bromsanordningar, ljudnivåer och anordningar för hastighetsbegränsning. En hög teknisk standard på fordon som körs enligt detta avtal säkerställs också genom att endast fordon som uppfyller Euro I-standarderna kan utnyttja dessa tillstånd.18. Dessutom säkerställs genom avtalet bland annat att de båda avtalsslutande parterna tillämpar likvärdiga sociala bestämmelser, och genomför relevant lagstiftning om frakt av farligt gods.B.4. Hantering av avtal19. Den gemensamma kommitté som inrättas genom avtalet skall se till att det genomförs på ett korrekt sätt för att transittrafiken på väg skall fungera smidigt.B.5. Kombinerad transport20. I avtalet finns ett antal bestämmelser om främjande av kombinerade transporter som återspeglar båda parters önskemål att se till att miljövänliga transportsätt används i allt större utsträckning för deras internationella transporter.21. De relevanta bestämmelserna i avtalen bygger på gemenskapens princip och politik när det gäller kombinerade transporter. I avtalet anges ett antal omfattande stödåtgärder som skall vidtas av de avtalsslutande parterna för att förbättra konkurrenskraften hos kombinerade transporter.22. Många av dessa åtgärder syftar till att uppmuntra användare och avsändare att oftare använda sig av kombinerade transporter. Dessa åtgärder är bland annat sådana som är avsedda att göra de kombinerade transporterna snabbare och mer pålitliga, att främja användningen av obeledsagade kombinerade transporter och att förenkla kvoterings- och tillståndssystemen för dem som använder kombinerade transporter.23. Bestämmelserna om kombinerade transporter återspeglar också att det är nödvändigt att förbättra infrastrukturen och framhäver nödvändigheten av att det upprättas en lämplig infrastruktur för att näten skall vara kompatibla med varandra.24. Genom avtalet erkänns också att information om nya kombinerade transporter, bland annat om teknikforskningsprojekt, bör göras tillgänglig på begäran för att främja utvecklingen och en ökad användning av kombinerade transporter.C. Slutsats25. Kommissionen anser att utkastet till avtal är godtagbart för gemenskapens del och den föreslår därför att rådet(i) godkänner förhandlingsresultaten,(ii) beslutar att underteckna avtalet, och(iii) inleder förfarandet för att sluta avtalet.26. Kommissionen överlämnar därför till rådet detta förslag till rådets beslut om undertecknande och rådets beslut om slutande av ett avtal om fastställande av vissa villkor för godstransporter på väg och om främjandet av kombinerade transporter mellan Europeiska gemenskapen och Rumänien.Förslag till RÅDETS BESLUT om undertecknande av avtalet mellan Europeiska gemenskapen och Rumänien om fastställande av vissa villkor för godstransporter på väg och om främjandet av kombinerade transporterEUROPEISKA UNIONENS RÅD HAR BESLUTAT FÖLJANDEmed beaktande av Fördraget om upprättandet av Europeiska gemenskapen, särskilt artikel 71 jämförd med artikel 300.2 första meningen i detta,med beaktande av kommissionens förslag, ochav följande skäl:Det är nödvändigt att på gemenskapens vägnar godkänna undertecknandet av avtalet mellan Europeiska gemenskapen och Rumänien om fastställande av vissa villkor för godstransporter på väg och om främjandet av kombinerade transporter.HÄRIGENOM FÖRESKRIVS FÖLJANDE.Artikel 1Förutsatt att ett avtal upprättas godkänns härmed på gemenskapens vägnar undertecknandet av transportavtalet mellan Europeiska gemenskapen och Rumänien.Artikel 2Rådets ordförande bemyndigas härmed att utse den eller de personer som skall ha behörighet att underteckna avtalet på gemenskapens vägnar.Utfärdat i Bryssel den På rådets vägnar Ordförande


type: other

text:
VIKTORIJA vardo reikšmė - Vardų reikšmės | Horoskopai.lt
 Horoskopai Vardų reikšmės VIKTORIJA
 Vardų reikšmės63 komentarai 2010/05/02 admin
 Vardo diena: 12.23.
 Vardo reikšmė: Viktorija iš lot. žodžio victoria “pergalė, nugalėtoja”. Viktorija taip pat yra senovės romėnų pergalės deivė.
 Panašūs ir giminingi vardai: Victoria, Vika, Vikenė, Viktė, Viktoria, Viktorina, Vitorija, Victorija.
 BEvejk tiesa raso :))
 2010/05/23 11:35
 Beveik tiesa 😀
 2010/08/04 10:45
 nu tikrai daug tiesos gan parasyta...
 na isties ira daug tiesos.
 Buvau apsalus kai paskaiciau, nes viskas tiesa ;]]
 Geras, istikruju daug tiesos parasyta ;DDD
 tiesu tiesa
 Na išties daug tiesos.. nors apie filosofija ir gilinimasi i moksla netiesa 😀
 bet šiaip beveik mano gyvenimas čia nupasakotas, hehe :}
 absoliuti tiesa. as tokia...
 Na tiesą rašo..;) Geros visai toks Viktorijos..;Dp
 2010/11/28 11:18
 na kaip ir tiesa, dauguma viku kiek pazystu yra gera sirdes, man tai patinka, bet yra ir tokiu kurios sia zeme galetu ir nevaikscioti, esu laiminga savo vardu:)
 Tikrai visiška tiesa
 2011/01/03 15:30
 tikrai labai daug tiesos net sunku patiket kad taip gali buti 🙂
 2011/02/17 22:06
 Na seip daug ko nesupratau.... Bet tiesos yra 😉
 Viktorija;]
 Tikrai daug tiesos, bet nemanau, kad tikrai visos Vitorijos tokios, kaip čia parašyta.:)
 Vikėėėėė
 Na yra tiesos, bet tikrai ne viskas 🙂
 Nelinkus esu į jokias išvardytas profesijas ir į tas “neigiamas vibracijas” 🙂
 aha beveik visiskai kaip as 😀
 2011/07/19 11:53
 Nera tiesos nei laso!
 2011/07/19 16:40
 99% tiesos...;) pati nepatikejau
 Nors mano antras vardas – bet pirmojo idealus partneris – tinka visiskai.
 2011/10/03 18:50
 Bet tai kai. Čia tiek daug tiesos parašyta,kad šakės. Įpač apie intuiciją,nes pavizdžiui mano intuicija taip tikrai labai gera.. Apšalau perskaičius.. 🙂
 2011/10/03 19:51
 wisa tiesa apie mane o ipac apie alkoxoli bet tikrai ne apie apie sexsa bei norkotikus bet zinokit jai leistu keist warda tai as keisciau i auguste:)
 2011/11/22 16:39
 Na, ka tenka pripazinti, kad tas zmogus, kuris renge si teksta pazysta mane geriau nei as pati. Is tiesu as suglumus nes jis visiskai teisus.... 🙂
 Beveik viskas sutampa, ziauriai nustebau perskaicius
 beveik viskas yra tiesa. sio vardo reiksme yra gryna tiesa. as visada laimiu
 Apie Viktorijas parasyta kaip is delno paskaityta. Visiska tiesa.Supper
 2012/02/02 13:44
 Viskas beveik tiesa!
 joo visa tiesa 🙂
 man patiko:))) tiesa rashot:)))
 2012/02/02 23:42
 dievinu savo varda:)))
 seip jeigu logiskai pamastyti puse apie mane parasyta netiesos. neesu filosofe ir niekada nieko neapsvarstau, o seip esu tikrai psichologiskas ir gerasirdis zmogus . Tai kad is 100 tik 49 proc. tiesos.
 2012/02/22 12:43
 Gal ir truputi tiesos yra nes as pazystu savo drauge Viktorija labai gerai ir ji lkabai geras zmogus yra bet apie ta alchoholi ir narkotikus visiskas melas ji ne uz milijona to nedarytu 😀
 na tiesos yra bet ne viskas 😀
 tobulai apie mane,,,,,,,,;DDDDDDDD
 yra tiesos bet nežinau ka dariti su savo jausmais
 2012/03/22 23:00
 Viktorijos geriausios!!!
 2012/04/24 14:01
 Hm tiesos yra nemazai, atrodo viskas tinka. Dabar as suprantu, kad “astrologe” mane isdure, nes panasiai kalbejo 🙂 matyt paskaite vardo reiksme. Manau merginos reikia kurti kokia asociacija ir pan., kad susiburtu visos VIKTORIJOS! Butu nuostabu, kad tiek daug gerasirdziu, talentingu ir visokiu kokiu Viktoriju susiburtu :)Labai grazus vardas ar ne taip? 🙂
 2012/06/14 11:39
 turiu klasioke viktorija, ji yra tokia nepakenciama, as jos nei trupucio nesuprantu... ji kazkokia keista, prilipus prie bernu, per daug linksma, mazvake, ji rengesi, sukuojasi jyg butu 7 metu nors jai 13... negaliu ji ikiri, per daug energinga... jos zodiakas jautis...
 AR JUS VISOS TOKIOS????
 2012/06/14 16:50
 Ne visa tiesa bet kazkiek tai tikrai yra tiesos ;))*
 tikra tiesa. viktorijos geriausios;)
 2012/08/05 16:41
 Sis vardas labai grazus ir tuo diziuojuosi nes mano vadrdas Viktorija
 2012/09/07 14:45
 Visa tiesa apie mane. Susipažinkite 🙂
 Tirli pirli ale tiesa tikra....
 2012/11/29 09:28
 viskas kas raso tai tiesa :DD
 2012/12/01 14:01
 m, viktorija grazus vardas mano drauge kristina nori sito vardo na ,gal gerai bet paliginkit viktoras tiktu viktorijai na man jis netinka
 na ....nk
 2012/12/12 19:29
 Oho. Visiška tiesa. :))))
 Metų lentelė pagal kinų kalendorių - 321 402 peržiūrėta
 Suderinamumo horoskopas - 192 658 peržiūrėta
 Skorpionas - 141 652 peržiūrėta
 Avinas - 139 601 peržiūrėta
 Dvyniai - 131 695 peržiūrėta
 Vėžys - 131 613 peržiūrėta
 Jautis - 121 457 peržiūrėta
 Ožiaragis - 114 453 peržiūrėta
 Šuo - 97 315 peržiūrėta
 Simbolių reikšmės - 75 184 peržiūrėta


type: caselaw

text:
9.9.2000 SV Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning C 259/5
 I motsats till vad Förbundsrepubliken Tyskland anser har Sökanden yrkar att domstolen skall
 innehållet av skadliga ämnen i de enstaka delarna av det
 förbrända avfallet ingen betydelse för frågan huruvida förbrän-
 ningen skall anses utgöra återvinning eller slutligt omhänderta-
 gande. I artikel 4 i direktiv 75/442/EEG föreskrivs visserligen
 en skyldighet för medlemsstaterna att säkerställa att avfall 1. fastställa att Konungariket Nederländerna har underlåtit
 återvinns eller omhändertas slutligt utan fara för människors att uppfylla sina skyldigheter enligt artikel 1.2, artikel 6.1
 hälsa och utan att processer eller metoder används som kan c och bilaga 3 punkt 4 i rådets direktiv av den 29 juli
 skada miljön. Bestämmelsen anger emellertid inte hur man 1991 om körkort (EGT L 237, 24.8.1991, s. 1; svensk
 skiljer mellan slutligt omhändertagande och återvinning. I specialutgåva, område 7, del 4, s. 22) samt enligt EG-
 detta sammanhang kan det för övrigt hänvisas till det system fördraget genom att anta artiklarna 107.1, 108.1 h, 109
 som ligger till grund för förordning (EEG) 259/93: Såväl de samt 111.1 a i Wegenverkeerswet 1994 (den nederländs-
 behöriga myndigheterna i avsändarstaten som myndigheterna ka vägtrafiklagen) samt artikel 100 i Reglement Rijbewij-
 i destinationsstaten kan på de angivna grunderna invända mot zen (den nederländska körkortsförordningen),
 avfallstransporter. Huruvida avfallet innehåller skadliga ämnen
 och förbränningsanläggningen uppfyller utsläppsnormerna
 saknar enligt förordningen betydelse för möjligheten att fram-
 ställa invändningar. Skyldigheterna enligt artikel 4 i förordnin-
 gen gäller för varje medlemsstat inom dess område oavsett
 transportsätt. 2. förplikta Konungariket Nederländerna att ersätta rätte-
 gångskostnaderna.
 Kommissionen anser vidare att medlemsstaterna inte får
 uppställa några villkor som medför att direktivets bestämmel-
 ser avseende avgränsning av användningssätt inte följs. Det är
 visserligen korrekt att det mot bakgrund av den gällande
 ordalydelsen av direktiv 75/442/EEG i enstaka fall kan vara
 svårt att skilja mellan återvinning och slutligt omhändertagan-
 de. Kommissionen har därför i ett arbetsdokument faktiskt
 föreskrivit ett värmevärdekrav. Enheter vid kommissionen är
 emellertid för närvarande upptagna med att utarbeta andra Grunder och huvudargument
 lösningar som skall kunna inarbetas i direktiv 75/442/EEG i
 form av en teknisk anpassning av direktivets bilagor enligt
 artikel 17.
 — Artikel 1.2 i direktiv 91/439 har åsidosatts till följd av
 (1) EGT L 30, 6.2.1993, s. 1. att det i Nederländerna har införts bestämmelser om
 (2) EGT L 194, 25.7.1975, s. 39. obligatorisk och systematisk registrering efter ett års
 bosättning i Nederländerna. Det följer av artikel 1.1 i
 direktivet och av lydelsen av artikel 1.2 att körkort som
 är utfärdade av medlemsstaterna utan några formella krav
 skall erkännas av myndigheterna i värdmedlemsstaten.
 Den som innehar ett körkort som har utfärdats i enlighet
 med gemenskapsmallen är inte längre skyldig att byta ut
 detta när han bosätter sig i en annan medlemsstat. Detta
 innebär att innehavaren besparas administrativt besvär
 vid bosättningen och naturligtvis också när han eventuellt
 återvänder till den medlemsstat där körkortet är utfärdat
 eller om han därefter flyttar till en tredje medlemsstat.
 Talan mot Konungariket Nederländerna väckt den 20 juni För att sådana hinder verkligen skall kunna undvikas
 2000 av Europeiska gemenskapernas kommission måste det i artikel 1.2 föreskrivna ömsesidiga erkännandet
 ske ”formlöst”. Enligt den nederländska vägtrafiklagen
 kan formlöst ömsesidigt erkännande endast komma i
 (Mål C-246/00) fråga om innehavaren är bosatt i Nederländerna i mindre
 än ett år. Körkort som inte registreras inom ett år efter
 (2000/C 259/08) bosättningen upphör att vara giltiga i Nederländerna. Att
 framföra ett fordon i Nederländerna med ett sådant
 körkort jämställs med olovlig körning. Konungariket
 Europeiska gemenskapernas kommission har den 20 juni Nederländerna har ersatt skyldigheten att byta ut körkort
 2000 väckt talan vid Europeiska gemenskapernas domstol — vilken föreskrivs i direktiv 80/1263 och kritiseras i
 mot Konungariket Nederländerna. Sökanden företräds av nionde övervägandet till direktiv 91/439 och i punkt 26
 juridiske rådgivaren M. Wolfcarius och H.M.H. Speyart, rätts- i domen i målet Skanavi (1) — med en registreringsskyldig-
 tjänsten, båda i egenskap av ombud, delgivningsadress: rätts- het. Detta strider mot systemet med ömsesidigt erkännan-
 tjänsten, C. Gómez de la Cruz, Centre Wagner, Kirchberg, de av körkort som är utfärdade i medlemsstaterna, såsom
 Luxemburg. föreskrivs i artikel 1.2 i direktiv 91/439.
 ---pagebreak--- C 259/6 SV Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning 9.9.2000
 Artikel 1.3 i direktiv 91/439 kan inte åberopas för att Talan mot Konungariket Nederländerna väckt den 26 juni
 motivera bestämmelser om obligatorisk och systematisk 2000 av Europeiska gemenskapernas kommission
 registrering av körkort som är utfärdade av andra med-
 lemsstater. De nederländska myndigheternas ståndpunkt (Mål C-254/00)
 bygger på en felaktig uppfattning av förhållandet mellan
 artikel 1.2 och artikel 1.3 i direktivet och mellan direktivet
 och artikel 43 EG. Dessutom är de medel som används (2000/C 259/09)
 av de nederländska myndigheterna oproportionerliga.
 Europeiska gemenskapernas kommission har den 26 juni
 2000 väckt talan vid Europeiska gemenskapernas domstol
 mot Konungariket Nederländerna. Sökanden företräds av
 — Artikel 1.2 i direktiv 91/439 har åsidosatts till följd av att juridiske rådgivaren H. van Lier, i egenskap av ombud, delgiv-
 giltighetstiden för körkort som är utfärdade i en annan ningsadress: rättstjänsten, C. Gómez de la Cruz, Centre Wag-
 medlemsstat bestäms med utgångspunkt från dagen för ner, Kirchberg, Luxemburg.
 utfärdande i den medlemsstaten. De nederländska myn-
 digheterna tillämpar de nationella bestämmelserna om
 giltighetstid för körkort från den tidpunkt då körkortet Sökanden yrkar att domstolen skall
 utfärdades i den andra medlemsstaten och inte från den
 tidpunkt då innehavaren bosatte sig i Nederländerna. 1. fastställa att Konungariket Nederländerna har underlåtit
 Även i detta avseende har de nederländska myndigheterna att uppfylla sina skyldigheter enligt Europaparlamentets
 missförstått förhållandet mellan artikel 1.2 och artikel och rådets direktiv 95/47/EG (1) av den 24 oktober 1995
 1.3 i direktivet, eftersom det ömsesidiga erkännandet om tillämpning av standarder för sändning av televisions-
 som föreskrivs i artikel 1.2 för ett stort antal körkortsinne- signaler, genom att inte vidta de åtgärder som är nödvän-
 havare härigenom blir betydelselöst. De nederländska diga för att följa detta direktiv,
 myndigheterna har missförstått innebörden av begreppet
 ”ömsesidigt erkännande”. Detta begrepp innebär inte att 2. förplikta Konungariket Nederländerna att ersätta rätte-
 innehavare av nederländska körkort och innehavare av gångskostnaderna.
 körkort som är utfärdade av andra medlemsstater måste
 behandlas lika, utan att körkort som är utfärdade av andra
 medlemsstater skall ges samma rättsverkningar som i den Grunder och huvudargument
 utfärdande medlemsstaten. Syftet är inte att säkerställa att
 innehavare av nederländska körkort inte diskrimineras i Enligt artikel 249 tredje stycket EG skall medlemsstaterna vidta
 förhållande till innehavare av andra körkort, utan att alla nödvändiga åtgärder för att genomföra de direktiv som
 de sistnämnda körkortsinnehavarnas etableringsfrihet i riktar sig till dem inom den tidsfrist som föreskrivs i dessa
 Nederländerna inte begränsas. direktiv. Tidsfristen för att genomföra det ifrågavarande direkti-
 vet gick ut den 23 augusti 1996 utan att Konungariket
 Nederländerna hade vidtagit de nödvändiga åtgärderna.
 — Artikel 6.1 c i direktiv 91/439 har åsidosatts. I den
 nederländska lagen föreskrivs en minimiålder på 18 år (1) EGT L 281, s. 51.
 för förare i kategori D, medan denna ålder skall vara
 21 år enligt artikel 6.1 c i direktivet.
 — Bilaga 3, punkt 4 i direktiv 91/439 har åsidosatts. Artikel
 100 i den nederländska körkortsförordningen är inte
 förenlig med bilaga 3, punkt 4 i direktivet, eftersom det i Begäran om förhandsavgörande enligt beslut av High
 den nederländska bestämmelsen inte föreskrivs att förare Court of Justice (England & Wales), Queen’s Bench
 i grupp 2 (lastbilsförare och bussförare) skall genomgå Division (Crown Office) av den 21 juni 2000 i målet
 regelbundna läkarundersökningar. mellan Commissioners of Customs and Excise och Zoolo-
 gical Society of London
 (Mål C-267/00)
 (1) Domstolens dom av den 29 februari i mål C-193/94, Skanavi, (2000/C 259/10)
 REG 1996, s. I-929.
 High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Queen’s Bench
 Division (Crown Office) begär genom beslut av den 21 juni
 2000, vilket inkom till domstolens kansli den 3 juli 2000,
 att Europeiska gemenskapernas domstol skall meddela ett
 förhandsavgörande i målet mellan Commissioners of Customs
 and Excise och Zoological Society of London beträffande
 följande frågor:


type: wikipedia

text:
Is é an t-úrscéal deireanach agus b'fhéidir an ceann is aitheanta é Scachnovelle (Úrscéalfichille) a scríobh Stefan Zweig sular chuir sé lámh ina bhás féin sa bhliain 1942.
 An Scéal
 Ar long phaisnéire ag seoladh idir Nua-Eabhrac agus Buenos Aires éiríonn leis an bpríomhcharactéir, seaimpín fichille an domhain, atá mar phaisnéir ar an long, a mhealladh isteach i gcluiche fichille ar son airgid. Agus an cluiche ar siúl chuireann Dr B., teifeach ón Ostair, comhairle ar an mbuíonn fear atá ag imirt i gcoinne an tseaimpín agus de bharr a chabhar chríochnaíonn an cluiche cothrom. Bíonn an méid sin iontas ar na bhfearaibh go ndéanann an príomhcharactéir tréaniarracht an teifeach a mhealladh chun cluiche iomlán a imirt i gcoinne an tseaimpín. Agus é ag iarraidh chuir ina luí air gur cheart dó an dúshlán a thabhairt, instear scéal an teifigh dúinn.
 Is léir gur chuireadh faoi ghlas é in óstán ag na naitsithe ar feadh achar fada gan aige ach leabhar faoi 150 cluiche fichille clúiteach, a ghoid sé ó saighdiúir Gearmánach lena aigne a choimeád aclaí. Tar éis tamaill bíonn chuile cluiche ar eolas aige agus ansin agus é cráite ag an t-uaigneas éiríonn leis cluichí a imirt idir dubh agus bán ina intinn féin. Is gá dó a intinn a scoilt ina dhá leath go samhlaíoch chun an éacht seo a bhaint amach. Éiríonn leis ach faoi dheireadh chuireann an deighilt cumtha seo isteach air agus chuireadh faoi chúram siciatraí in ospidéal é. Tá an sicitraí thar a bheith tuisceannach agus tar éis biseach a theacht air an ostaireach, scaoileadh saor é. Tugadh foláireamh dó gan a bheith ag plé le fichille arís áfach. Dár ndóigh chuireann an príomhcharactéir ina luí air an cluiche a imirt.
 Baineann an teifeach an chéad chluiche agus bíonn iontas ar an seaimpín agus ar an gcomhluadar. In aghaidh thoil an teifigh, shocraíonn siad cluiche eile a imirt chun deis díoltais a thabhairt don seaimpín. Séard a thiteann amach ná go gcuireann an seaimpín isteach chomh mór sin ar an teifeach, d'aon turas, le himirt mall go chliseann sláinte intinne an Ostarach agus fágann sé an bord le gealltannas nach n'imreofadh sé fichille arís go deo.
 Miniú an Scéil
 Deirtear go seasann seaimpín fichille an domhain do Hitler, duine gan oiliúint gan samhlaíocht ach talainn de shaghas éigeann aige agus go seasann an buíonn eile do na comhghualaithe le talainn, oideachas agus tuisceannt ach gan an cumas acu cuir in aghaidh an bodach míléannta. Faraoir fuair Zweig bás sular chruthú a mhalairt.
 Úrscéalta


text:
Féach Corn Sacair an Domhain.
 Ba chomórtas sacair é Corn FIFA an Domhain 2006 a bhí ar siúl sa Ghearmáin sa bhliain 2006. Thosaigh sé ar an 9 Meitheamh agus chríochnaigh sé ar an 9 Iúil.
 Bronnadh an corn ar an Iodáil, a fuair an ceann is fearr ar an Fhrainc sa chluiche ceannais. B'é Miroslav Klose ón nGearmáin an scóraí ab fhearr, le cúig chúl aimsithe aige.
 Staideanna
 Bhí na cluichí ar siúl i 12 staideanna, i 12 cathracha ar fud na Gearmáine:
 Beirlín - Olympiastadion
 Dortmund - Signal Iduna Park
 Frankfurt - Commerzbank-Arena
 Gelsenkirchen - Veltins-Arena
 Hamburg - AOL Arena
 Hanover - AWD-Arena
 Kaiserslautern - Fritz-Walter-Stadion
 Köln - RheinEnergieStadion
 Leipzig - Zentralstadion
 München - Allianz Arena
 Nürnberg - easyCredit-Stadion
 Stuttgart - Gottlieb-Daimler-Stadion
 Imríodh an cluiche ceannais san Olympiastadion i mBeirlín ar an 9 Iúil, 2006.
 Grúpaí
 Roghnaíodh na grúpaí ag FIFA ar 9 Nollaig, 2005 i Leipzig. Dúradh gurb iad Grúpaí C agus E na cinn ba dheacra.
 Grúpa A
 Grúpa B
 Grúpa C
 Grúpa D
 Grúpa E
 Grúpa F
 Grúpa G
 Grúpa H
 Babhta a 2
 Sathairn 24 Meitheamh 2006
 Domhnach 25 Meitheamh 2006
 Luain 26 Meitheamh 2006
 Máirt 27 Meitheamh 2006
 Cluichí ceathrú ceannais
 Aoine 30 Meitheamh 2006
 Q1 An Ghearmáin 4 – 2 (pionóis) An Airgintín (Olympiastadion, Berlin)
 Q2 An Iodáil 3 – 0 An Úcráin (FIFA WM Stadion Hamburg, Hamburg)
 An Sathairn 1 Iúil 2006
 Q3 Sasana 1 – 3 (pionóis) An Phortaingéil (FIFA WM Stadion Gelsenkirchen, Gelsenkirchen)
 Q4 An Bhrasaíl 0 – 1 An Fhrainc (FIFA WM Stadion Frankfurt, Frankfurt)
 Cluichí leathcheannais
 S1 An Ghearmáin 0 – 2 An Iodáil
 S2 An Phortaingéil 0 – 1 An Fhrainc
 Cluiche ceannais
 An Iodáil 1 – 1 (a.e.t.) 5 – 3 (pionóis) An Fhrainc
 Naisc sheachtracha
 Suíomh oifigiúil
 Staideanna
 Sceideal oifigiúil
 Ilchomórtais sacair
 Spórt i 2006


text:
 Avis juridique important
 |
 21995A0426(15)
 Acuerdo en forma de canje de notas entre la Comunidad Europea y Mongolia por el que se modifica el Acuerdo entre la Comunidad Económica Europea y Mongolia sobre el comercio de productos textiles como consecuencia de la adhesión prevista de la República de Austria, de la República de Finlandia y del Reino de Suecia a la Unión Europea - Canje de notas Traducción oficiosa
 Diario Oficial n° L 094 de 26/04/1995 p. 0285 - 0305 Diario Oficial n° L 094 de 26/04/1995 p. 0285 - 0305
 AGREEMENT in the form of an exchange of letters between the European Community and Mongolia amending the Agreement between the European Economic Community and Mongolia on trade in textile products to take into account the expected accession of the Republic of Austria, the Republic of Finland and the Kingdom of Sweden to the European UnionLetter from the Council of the European Union Sir,1. I have the honour to refer to the Agreement between the European Economic Community and Mongolia on trade in textile products initialled on 22 January 1993.2. In order to take into account the expected accession of the Republic of Austria, the Republic of Finland and the Kingdom of Sweden to the European Union on 1 January 1995, the European Community considers that the following amendments should be made to the Agreement between the European Economic Community and Mongolia on trade in textile products:2.1. The following text is added after Article 8, paragraph 2:'For the purposes of applying the provisions of paragraph 2 in the year 1995, the preceding year's total imports from all third countries shall be calculated on the basis of imports into the Community as constituted on 31 December 1994 and of imports into Austria, Finland and Sweden. Trade between the Community, Austria, Finland and Sweden, or between Austria, Finland and Sweden shall be excluded from this total.`2.2. Figures in Annex II which set out the quantitative limits for exports from Mongolia to the European Union are to be replaced by limits for the enlarged Community as set out in Appendix I to this letter.2.3. Article 14, paragraph 2, subparagraph 2, second indent of Protocol A, Title IV should be amended as follows:'- two letters identifying the intended Member State of customs clearance as follows:AT = AustriaBL = BeneluxDE = Federal Republic of GermanyDK = DenmarkEL = GreeceES = SpainFI = FinlandFR = FranceGB = United KingdomIE = IrelandIT = ItalyPT = PortugalSE = Sweden`2.4. The Annex to Protocol A setting out the model of the certificate of origin is replaced by Appendix II to this letter.2.5. The Annex to Protocol A setting out the model of the export licence is replaced by Appendix III to this letter.2.6. The Annex to Protocol B setting out the model of the certificate applicable to certain cottage industry and folklore products is replaced by Appendix IV to this letter.2.7. Figures in the Annex to Protocol C which set out the quantitative limits for economic outward processing operations are to be replaced by limits for the enlarged Community as set out in Appendix V to this letter.2.8. Should one or more acceding countries not join the European Union the adjustments calculated for this or these countries shall be deducted from the 'Adjusted limits 1995, 1996 and 1997` set out in Appendices I and V to this letter and the respective amendments mentioned under point 2.3 shall not enter into force.2.9. Notwithstanding the modifications referred to under points 2.4, 2.5 and 2.6, during a transitional period that will end on 30 June 1995, the competent authorities of Mongolia shall be authorized to continue issuing the forms that were in use in 1994.2.10. Should inaccuracies appear in the trade figures used to establish the adjustments contained in Appendices I and V, technical revisions of these adjustments will be made following consultations and provided that the request for consultations is made not later than 28 February 1995.3. I should be obliged if you could kindly confirm the acceptance of your Government of the foregoing. Should this be the case, this Agreement in the form of an exchange of letters shall enter into force on the first day of the month following the day on which the Parties have notified each other that the legal procedures necessary to this end have been completed. In the meantime, it shall be applied provisionally from 1 January 1995 on the conditions to be specified in an exchange of notes (see Appendix VI).Please accept, Sir, the assurance of my highest consideration.For the Council of the European UnionAppendix I ANNEX II COMMUNITY QUANTITATIVE LIMITS >SITIO PARA UN CUADRO>Appendix II >REFERENCIA A UN FILM>Appendix III >REFERENCIA A UN FILM>Appendix IV >REFERENCIA A UN FILM>Appendix V ANNEX TO PROTOCOL C OUTWARD PROCESSING TRAFFIC Community quantitative limits >SITIO PARA UN CUADRO>Appendix VI Exchange of notes The Directorate-General for External Economic Relations of the Commission of the European Communities presents its compliments to the Mission of Mongolia to the European Communities and has the honour to refer to the Agreement on trade in textile products between Mongolia and the European Economic Community initialled on 22 January 1993, as amended by the exchange of letters initialled on (date of initialling).The Directorate-General wishes to inform the Mission of Mongolia that whilst awaiting the completion of the necessary procedures for the conclusion and coming into force of the amended Agreement, the European Community is prepared to allow the provisions of the Agreement to apply de facto from 1 January 1995. This is on the understanding that either Party may at any time terminate this de facto application of the amended Agreement provided that one hundred and twenty days notice is given.The Directorate-General for External Economic Relations would be grateful if the Mission of Mongolia would confirm its agreement to the foregoing.The Directorate-General for External Economic Relations of the Commission of the European Communities avails itself of this opportunity to renew to the Mission of Mongolia to the European Communities the assurance of its highest consideration.The Mission of Mongolia to the European Communities presents its compliments to the Directorate-General for External Economic Relations of the Commission of the European Communities and has the honour to refer to the note of the Directorate-General of (date of note verbale) regarding the Agreement on trade in textile products between Mongolia and the European Economic Community initialled on 22 January 1993, as amended by the exchange of letters initialled on (date of initialling).The Mission of Mongolia wishes to confirm to the Directorate-General that whilst awaiting the completion of the necessary procedures for the conclusion and coming into force of the adapted Agreement, the Government of Mongolia is prepared to allow the provisions of the Agreement to apply de facto from 1 January 1995. This is on the understanding that either Party may at any time terminate this de facto application of the adapted Agreement provided that one hundred and twenty days notice is given.The Mission of Mongolia to the European Communities avails itself of this opportunity to renew to the Directorate-General for External Economic Relations of the Commission of the European Communities the assurance of its highest consideration.Letter from the Government of Mongolia Sir,I have the honour to acknowledge receipt of your letter of . . . which reads as follows:'Sir,1. I have the honour to refer to the Agreement between the European Economic Community and Mongolia on trade in textile products initialled on 22 January 1993.2. In order to take into account the expected accession of the Republic of Austria, the Republic of Finland and the Kingdom of Sweden to the European Union on 1 January 1995, the European Community considers that the following amendments should be made to the Agreement between the European Economic Community and Mongolia on trade in textile products:2.1. The following text is added after Article 8, paragraph 2:"For the purposes of applying the provisions of paragraph 2 in the year 1995, the preceding year's total imports from all third countries shall be calculated on the basis of imports into the Community as constituted on 31 December 1994 and of imports into Austria, Finland and Sweden. Trade between the Community, Austria, Finland and Sweden, or between Austria, Finland and Sweden shall be excluded from this total."2.2. Figures in Annex II which set out the quantitative limits for exports from Mongolia to the European Union are to be replaced by limits for the enlarged Community as set out in Appendix I to this letter.2.3. Article 14, paragraph 2, subparagraph 2, second indent of Protocol A, Title IV should be amended as follows:"- two letters identifying the intended Member State of customs clearance as follows:AT = AustriaBL = BeneluxDE = Federal Republic of GermanyDK = DenmarkEL = GreeceES = SpainFI = FinlandFR = FranceGB = United KingdomIE = IrelandIT = ItalyPT = PortugalSE = Sweden"2.4. The Annex to Protocol A setting out the model of the certificate of origin is replaced by Appendix II to this letter.2.5. The Annex to Protocol A setting out the model of the export licence is replaced by Appendix III to this letter.2.6. The Annex to Protocol B setting out the model of the certificate applicable to certain cottage industry and folklore products is replaced by Appendix IV to this letter.2.7. Figures in the Annex to Protocol C which set out the quantitative limits for economic outward processing operations are to be replaced by limits for the enlarged Community as set out in Appendix V to this letter.2.8. Should one or more acceding countries not join the European Union the adjustments calculated for this or these countries shall be deducted from the "Adjusted limits 1995, 1996 and 1997" set out in Appendices I and V to this letter and the respective amendments mentioned under point 2.3 shall not enter into force.2.9. Notwithstanding the modifications referred to under points 2.4, 2.5 and 2.6, during a transitional period that will end on 30 June 1995, the competent authorities of Mongolia shall be authorized to continue issuing the forms that were in use in 1994.2.10. Should inaccuracies appear in the trade figures used to establish the adjustments contained in Appendices I and V, technical revisions of these adjustments will be made following consultations and provided that the request for consultations is made not later than 28 February 1995.3. I should be obliged if you could kindly confirm the acceptance of your Government of the foregoing. Should this be the case, this Agreement in the form of an exchange of letters shall enter into force on the first day of the month following the day on which the Parties have notified each other that the legal procedures necessary to this end have been completed. In the meantime, it shall be applied provisionally from 1 January 1995 on the conditions to be specified in an exchange of notes (see Appendix VI).Please accept, Sir, the assurance of my highest consideration.`I have the honour to confirm that my Government is in agreement with the contents of your letter.Please accept, Sir, the assurance of my highest consideration.For the Government of MongoliaAppendix I ANNEX II COMMUNITY QUANTITATIVE LIMITS >SITIO PARA UN CUADRO>Appendix II >REFERENCIA A UN FILM>Appendix III >REFERENCIA A UN FILM>Appendix IV >REFERENCIA A UN FILM>Appendix V ANNEX TO PROTOCOL C OUTWARD PROCESSING TRAFFIC Community quantitative limits >SITIO PARA UN CUADRO>Appendix VI Exchange of notes The Directorate-General for External Economic Relations of the Commission of the European Communities presents its compliments to the Mission of Mongolia to the European Communities and has the honour to refer to the Agreement on trade in textile products between Mongolia and the European Economic Community initialled on 22 January 1993, as amended by the exchange of letters initialled on (date of initialling).The Directorate-General wishes to inform the Mission of Mongolia that whilst awaiting the completion of the necessary procedures for the conclusion and coming into force of the amended Agreement, the European Community is prepared to allow the provisions of the Agreement to apply de facto from 1 January 1995. This is on the understanding that either Party may at any time terminate this de facto application of the amended Agreement provided that one hundred and twenty days notice is given.The Directorate-General for External Economic Relations would be grateful if the Mission of Mongolia would confirm its agreement to the foregoing.The Directorate-General for External Economic Relations of the Commission of the European Communities avails itself of this opportunity to renew to the Mission of Mongolia to the European Communities the assurance of its highest consideration.The Mission of Mongolia to the European Communities presents its compliments to the Directorate-General for External Economic Relations of the Commission of the European Communities and has the honour to refer to the note of the Directorate-General of (date of note verbale) regarding the Agreement on trade in textile products between Mongolia and the European Economic Community initialled on 22 January 1993, as amended by the exchange of letters initialled on (date of initialling).The Mission of Mongolia wishes to confirm to the Directorate-General that whilst awaiting the completion of the necessary procedures for the conclusion and coming into force of the adapted Agreement, the Government of Mongolia is prepared to allow the provisions of the Agreement to apply de facto from 1 January 1995. This is on the understanding that either Party may at any time terminate this de facto application of the adapted Agreement provided that one hundred and twenty days notice is given.The Mission of Mongolia to the European Communities avails itself of this opportunity to renew to the Directorate-General for External Economic Relations of the Commission of the European Communities the assurance of its highest consideration.