type: other

text:
1. §3 (1) E törvény hatálya a központi államigazgatási szervekre, a Kormány tagjaira, az államtitkárokra, valamint a biztosi jogviszonyban álló személyekre terjed ki.
 a)4 az államigazgatási szerv alapítása, átalakítása, valamint megszüntetése,
 b)5 az államigazgatási szerv vezetésére kinevezés, vezetői megbízás adása, az államigazgatási szerv vezetőjének felmentése, a vezetői megbízás visszavonása, és – ha törvény vagy kormányrendelet másként nem rendelkezik – az államigazgatási szerv vezetőjével kapcsolatos egyéb munkáltatói jogok gyakorlása,
 e)6 az államigazgatási szerv döntésének megsemmisítése, szükség szerint új eljárás lefolytatására való utasítás,
 i)7 az államigazgatási szerv kezelésében lévő közérdekű adatok és közérdekből nyilvános adatok, valamint a b), c) és e)–h) pont szerinti irányítási hatáskörök gyakorlásához szükséges, törvényben meghatározott személyes adatok kezelése.
 3. §9 Az államigazgatási szerv szervezeti egysége vezetője tevékenységének irányítása alatt – törvény eltérő rendelkezése hiányában – a kormányzati igazgatásról szóló törvény szerinti, az egyes tisztségviselők tevékenységének irányításával kapcsolatos hatásköröket kell érteni.
 4. §10 Ha jogszabály államigazgatási szerv felügyeletét említi, azon
 (3)11 A központi államigazgatási szerv szervezeti és működési szabályzata a szerv vezetőjének hatáskörébe tartozó egyes ügyekben a kiadmányozási jogot
 5/A. §12 (1) A központi államigazgatási szerv, a miniszter irányítása vagy felügyelete alatt álló központi költségvetési szerv és – ha a miniszter gazdasági társaság felett tulajdonosi jogot, illetve alapítvány tekintetében alapítói jogot gyakorol – az ilyen gazdasági társaság, illetve az ilyen alapítvány a Kormány rendeletében meghatározott esetben és módon átadás-átvételi eljárást folytat le.
 Az egyes kormányzati igazgatási tisztségviselőkre vonatkozó szabályok13
 (6)20 A politikai felsővezető, a kormánybiztos, a miniszterelnöki biztos, a miniszteri biztos, valamint a kormányzati főhivatal és a központi hivatal vezetője és helyettese a tárgyév március 1-jétől a következő év február utolsó napjáig terjedő időszakra vonatkozó havi illetménye, valamint a miniszterelnöki megbízott havi vagy egyszeri díjazása nem haladhatja meg a Központi Statisztikai Hivatal által hivatalosan közzétett, a tárgyévet megelőző évre vonatkozó nemzetgazdasági havi átlagos bruttó kereset tízszeresét.
 (7)21 A (6) bekezdés nem alkalmazható, ha a miniszterelnök a miniszternek személyi illetményt állapít meg a 39/A. § szerint.
 (8)22 A politikai felsővezető illetménye, jutalma és célprémiuma nem önálló tevékenységből származó, járulékalapot képező jövedelemnek minősül.
 10. §26
 12. §28
 12/A. §29
 12/B. §30
 12/C. §31
 13. § (1)32 Ha a politikai felsővezető megbízatása megszűnt, illetménye és juttatásai addig illetik meg, amíg az Alaptörvény vagy törvény rendelkezései alapján gyakorolja hatáskörét.
 (2)33 Ha
 a hatáskörgyakorlás megszűnésétől számított tizenöt napon belül egy összegben hathavi – lemondás esetén pedig háromhavi – illetményével megegyező összegű juttatásra jogosult.
 (3)34 A miniszterelnök halála esetén házastársát, ennek hiányában élettársát (a továbbiakban együtt: özvegy) – özvegy hiányában örökösét, több örökös esetén örököseit – egy összegben a miniszterelnök hathavi illetményének megfelelő összegű juttatás illeti meg. A miniszter és az államtitkár halála esetén a (2) és (4) bekezdés szerinti juttatás a miniszter és az államtitkár özvegyét – özvegy hiányában a miniszter és az államtitkár örökösét, több örökös esetén örököseit – illeti meg.
 (3a)35 A miniszterelnök halála esetén a rá tekintettel járó hozzátartozói nyugellátás megállapítása szempontjából a mindenkori miniszterelnöki illetmény havi összegét kell a miniszterelnök öregségi nyugdíjaként figyelembe venni.
 (4)36 Ha a politikai felsővezető megbízatása a (2) bekezdésben meghatározott okokból
 (5)37 Ha a politikai felsővezető a megbízatásának megszűnését követően újabb politikai felsővezetői megbízatást vagy szakmai felsővezetői kinevezést kap, a (2) és (4) bekezdésben meghatározott juttatás összege megegyezik a hatásköre gyakorlásának megszűnésétől az új megbízatással vagy kinevezéssel összefüggő hivatalba lépéséig terjedő időre járó illetménnyel.
 (7)39 A (2) és a (4) bekezdésben meghatározott időtartamok számításánál a folyamatosan politikai szolgálati jogviszonyban töltött időt – a hatáskörgyakorlás megszűnésétől az új megbízatással összefüggésben a hivatalba lépésig terjedő, legfeljebb hat hónapos, valamint a megbízatás megszűnésétől a hatáskörgyakorlás megszűnéséig terjedő megszakítást a folyamatosság szempontjából nem számítva – egybe kell számítani.
 (8)40 A (2), (3) és (4) bekezdésben meghatározott juttatás nem önálló tevékenységből származó, járulékalapot képező jövedelemnek minősül.
 14. § (1)41 A miniszter és az államtitkár a miniszterelnök által meghatározott összegű jutalomban részesülhet. Az államtitkár jutalmára a tevékenységét irányító miniszter – a Miniszterelnöki Kormányiroda közigazgatási államtitkára útján – tesz javaslatot. Az államtitkár számára célprémiumot a miniszterelnök állapíthat meg. A célprémiumra az államtitkár tevékenységét irányító miniszter tesz javaslatot.
 (2a)43
 II. FEJEZET49
 16. §50
 17. §51
 19. §53
 20. §54
 22. §56
 23. §57
 23/A. §58
 24. §59
 25/A. §61 A miniszterelnök havi illetményének az összege megegyezik a köztisztviselői illetményalap harminckilencszeresével.
 25/B. §62
 25/C. §63
 25/D. §64
 26. §65
 27. §66
 28. §67
 29. §68
 30. §69
 30/A. §70
 31. §71 (1) Az egyidejűleg politikai vagy szakmai felsővezetői megbízatást is betöltő kormánybiztos kormánybiztosi tevékenységére tekintettel a kormánybiztosi kinevezésről szóló normatív kormányhatározatban meghatározott, legfeljebb a (2) bekezdés szerinti illetménynek megfelelő összegű díjazást kaphat, ha tevékenysége eredeti feladatkörével nem függ össze. A díjazás nem önálló tevékenységből származó, járulékalapot képező jövedelemnek minősül.
 32. §72 (1)73
 (2)74 A miniszterelnöki biztosra a 31. §-t alkalmazni kell azzal, hogy kormánybiztos alatt miniszterelnöki biztost, a Kormány normatív határozata alatt a miniszterelnök normatív utasítását, a Kormány alatt a miniszterelnököt kell érteni.
 33. § (1)79 Ha a kormánybiztost vagy a miniszterelnöki biztost megbízatási ideje alatt politikai felsővezetőnek, közigazgatási államtitkárnak vagy helyettes államtitkárnak is kinevezik, juttatásaira az e tisztségviselőre vonatkozó szabályok alkalmazandók azzal, hogy kormánybiztosi vagy miniszterelnöki biztosi megbízatására tekintettel akkor kaphat díjazást, ha e tevékenysége e tisztségviselői feladatkörével nem függ össze.
 (3)81 A megbízás díjazásaként a miniszterelnöki megbízott részére legfeljebb az államtitkári illetménynek megfelelő összegű díjazás, valamint kormányrendeletben meghatározott juttatás köthető ki.
 II/A. FEJEZET82
 33/C. §
 33/D. §
 33/E. §
 33/F. §
 III. FEJEZET83
 34. §84
 35. §85
 36. §86
 37. §87
 38. §88 (1)89
 (6)94 A miniszteri biztos helyettes államtitkári illetménynek megfelelő összegű díjazásra és kormányrendeletben meghatározott juttatásokra jogosult. A díjazás nem önálló tevékenységből származó, járulékalapot képező jövedelemnek minősül.
 (9)96 A miniszteri biztos kinevezéséről szóló normatív utasítás a miniszteri biztos díjazását és juttatásait a (6) bekezdésben meghatározottnál alacsonyabb mértékben is megállapíthatja.
 39. §97 (1) A miniszter alapilletménye a köztisztviselői illetményalap 15,6-szorosa.
 39/A. §98 (1) A miniszterelnök a miniszter részére az e törvényben meghatározott javadalmazásra vonatkozó szabályoktól eltérő személyi illetményt állapíthat meg.
 51. §110 (1) Az államtitkár alapilletménye a köztisztviselői illetményalap 12-szerese.
 (4)111 Az államtitkár alapilletményét a miniszter át nem ruházható hatáskörében legfeljebb 30%-kal megemelheti, vagy legfeljebb 20%-kal csökkentett mértékben állapíthatja meg.
 52. §112
 53. §113
 54. §114
 55. §115
 56. §116
 57. §117
 58. §118
 59. §119
 60. §120
 61. §121
 62. §122
 62/A. §123
 63. §124
 63/A. §125
 64. §126
 65. §127
 66. §128
 67. §129
 68. §130
 69. §131
 IV. FEJEZET132
 73/A. §133
 73/B. §134
 74. §135
 Felhatalmazó rendelkezések136
 75. § (1)137
 (4a)141
 (4b)142 Felhatalmazást kap a Kormány, hogy az 5/A. § szerinti átadás-átvétel eseteit, módját, időpontját és eljárási szabályait, valamint az átadás-átvétel felelősét rendeletben állapítsa meg.143
 Hatályba léptető rendelkezések145
 77. §146
 78. §147
 80. §149
 81. §150
 82. §151
 83. §152
 84. §153
 85. §154
 86. §155
 87. §156
 88. §157
 89. §158
 90. §159
 91. § (1)160
 (3)161 A 13. § (3a) bekezdését a hatálybalépése előtt megállapított hozzátartozói nyugellátásra is alkalmazni kell az 1990. május 23-át követően miniszterelnöki tisztséget betöltött személy hozzátartozója esetében.
 (4)162 Az e törvény hatálybalépését megelőzően a központi államigazgatási szervek, valamint területi és helyi szerveik, továbbá a minisztérium főosztályának vezetésére adott vezetői megbízásokra a köztisztviselők jogállásáról szóló 1992. évi XXIII. törvény 31. § (10)–(17) bekezdésének e törvény hatálybalépését megelőző napon hatályos rendelkezéseit kell alkalmazni.
 (5)163 Az egyes vagyonnyilatkozat-tételi kötelezettségekről szóló 2007. évi CLII. törvény e törvénnyel megállapított 5. § (1) bekezdés b) pontját és ezzel összefüggésben 8. § (4) bekezdését, 12. § (1) és (3) bekezdését, valamint 14. § (1)–(6) bekezdését azokra a vagyonnyilatkozat-tételre kötelezettekre kell alkalmazni, akiknek a kötelezettséget megalapozó jogviszonya, beosztása, munka- vagy feladatköre e törvény hatálybalépését követően szűnt meg.
 (6)164 Ha törvény úgy rendelkezik, hogy valamely tisztséget meghatározott időszakban helyettes államtitkárként szakmai vezetői jogviszonyban állt személy nem tölthet be, akkor az ugyanebben az időszakban szakállamtitkárként állami vezetői jogviszonyban állt személy sem töltheti be ezt a tisztséget.
 92. §165 A Magyarország 2019. évi központi költségvetésének megalapozásáról szóló 2018. évi XL. törvénnyel megállapított 39/A. § (2) bekezdését a 2018. évben azzal az eltéréssel kell alkalmazni, hogy a személyi illetmény 2018. augusztus 1-jétől 2019. február végéig terjedő időszakra állapítható meg.
 3 Az 1. § a 2018: CXXV. törvény 292. § (1) bekezdésével megállapított szöveg.
 4 A 2. § (1) bekezdés a) pontja a 2011: CCI. törvény 360. § (5) bekezdésével megállapított szöveg.
 5 A 2. § (1) bekezdés b) pontja a 2011: CCI. törvény 360. § (5) bekezdésével megállapított szöveg.
 6 A 2. § (1) bekezdés e) pontja a 2011: CCI. törvény 361. § (1) bekezdés h) pontja szerint módosított szöveg.
 7 A 2. § (1) bekezdés i) pontját a 2010: LXXXVI. törvény 22. §-a iktatta be, szövege a 2011: CCI. törvény 360. § (6) bekezdésével megállapított szöveg.
 8 A 2. § (3) bekezdését a 2018: CXXV. törvény 292. § (9) bekezdés 1. pontja hatályon kívül helyezte.
 9 A 3. § a 2018: CXXV. törvény 292. § (2) bekezdésével megállapított szöveg.
 10 A 4. § a 2011: CCI. törvény 360. § (7) bekezdésével megállapított szöveg.
 11 Az 5. § (3) bekezdése a 2018: CXXV. törvény 292. § (3) bekezdésével megállapított szöveg.
 12 Az 5/A. §-t a 2014: XXI. törvény 32. §-a iktatta be.
 13 A 6. §-t megelőző alcím a 2018: CXXV. törvény 292. § (8) bekezdés a) pontja szerint módosított szöveg.
 14 A 6. §-t a 2018: CXXV. törvény 292. § (9) bekezdés 2. pontja hatályon kívül helyezte.
 15 A 7. § (1) bekezdését a 2018: CXXV. törvény 292. § (9) bekezdés 3. pontja hatályon kívül helyezte.
 16 A 7. § (2) bekezdését a 2018: CXXV. törvény 292. § (9) bekezdés 3. pontja hatályon kívül helyezte.
 17 A 7. § (3) bekezdését a 2018: CXXV. törvény 292. § (9) bekezdés 3. pontja hatályon kívül helyezte.
 18 A 7. § (4) bekezdését a 2018: CXXV. törvény 292. § (9) bekezdés 3. pontja hatályon kívül helyezte.
 19 A 7. § (5) bekezdését a 2014: LXXXV. törvény 6. § a) pontja hatályon kívül helyezte.
 20 A 7. § (6) bekezdését a 2010: XC. törvény 91. § (1) bekezdése iktatta be, szövege a 2011: CCI. törvény 360. § (8) bekezdésével megállapított, a 2018: CXXV. törvény 292. § (8) bekezdés b) és c) pontja szerint módosított szöveg.
 21 A 7. § (7) bekezdését a 2018: XL. törvény 39. §-a iktatta be.
 22 A 7. § (8) bekezdését a 2018: CXXV. törvény 292. § (4) bekezdése iktatta be.
 23 A 7/A. §-t a 2014: LXXXV. törvény 5. § (1) bekezdése iktatta be, hatályon kívül helyezte a 2018: CXXV. törvény 292. § (9) bekezdés 4. pontja.
 24 A 8. §-t megelőző alcím címet és a 8. §-t a 2018: CXXV. törvény 292. § (9) bekezdés 5–6. pontja hatályon kívül helyezte.
 25 A 9. §-t a 2018: CXXV. törvény 292. § (9) bekezdés 6. pontja hatályon kívül helyezte.
 26 A 10. §-t a 2018: CXXV. törvény 292. § (9) bekezdés 6. pontja hatályon kívül helyezte.
 27 A 11. §-t a 2018: CXXV. törvény 292. § (9) bekezdés 6. pontja hatályon kívül helyezte.
 28 A 12. §-t a 2018: CXXV. törvény 292. § (9) bekezdés 6. pontja hatályon kívül helyezte.
 29 A 12/A. §-t a 2011: CCI. törvény 360. § (13) bekezdése iktatta be, hatályon kívül helyezte a 2018: CXXV. törvény 292. § (9) bekezdés 6. pontja.
 30 A 12/B. §-t a 2011: CCI. törvény 360. § (14) bekezdése iktatta be, hatályon kívül helyezte a 2018: CXXV. törvény 292. § (9) bekezdés 6. pontja.
 31 A 12/C. §-t a 2011: CCI. törvény 360. § (15) bekezdése iktatta be, hatályon kívül helyezte a 2018: CXXV. törvény 292. § (9) bekezdés 6. pontja.
 32 A 13. § (1) bekezdése a 2011: CCI. törvény 361. § (1) bekezdés k) pontja, a 2018: CXXV. törvény 292. § (8) bekezdés d) pontja szerint módosított szöveg.
 33 A 13. § (2) bekezdése a 2011: CCI. törvény 360. § (16) bekezdésével megállapított, záró szövegrésze a 2018: CXXV. törvény 292. § (10) bekezdés a) pontja szerint módosított szöveg.
 34 A 13. § (3) bekezdése a 2011: CCI. törvény 360. § (16) bekezdésével megállapított szöveg.
 35 A 13. § (3a) bekezdését a 2012: CXL. törvény 1. § (1) bekezdése iktatta be.
 36 A 13. § (4) bekezdése a 2011: CCI. törvény 360. § (16) bekezdésével megállapított, nyitó szövegrésze a 2018: CXXV. törvény 292. § (8) bekezdés d) pontja szerint módosított szöveg.
 37 A 13. § (5) bekezdése a 2011: CCI. törvény 361. § (1) bekezdés l) pontja, a 2018: CXXV. törvény 292. § (8) bekezdés d)–f) pontja szerint módosított szöveg.
 38 A 13. § (6) bekezdését a 2018: CXXV. törvény 292. § (9) bekezdés 7. pontja hatályon kívül helyezte.
 39 A 13. § (7) bekezdése a 2018: CXXV. törvény 292. § (8) bekezdés g) pontja szerint módosított szöveg.
 40 A 13. § (8) bekezdése a 2018: CXXV. törvény 292. § első (5) bekezdésével megállapított szöveg.
 41 A 14. § (1) bekezdése a 2018: CXXV. törvény 292. § második (5) bekezdésével megállapított szöveg.
 42 A 14. § (2) bekezdését a 2018: CXXV. törvény 292. § (9) bekezdés 8. pontja hatályon kívül helyezte.
 43 A 14. § (2a) bekezdését a 2011: CCI. törvény 360. § (17) bekezdése iktatta be, hatályon kívül helyezte a 2018: CXXV. törvény 292. § (9) bekezdés 8. pontja.
 44 A 14. § (3) bekezdését a 2018: CXXV. törvény 292. § (9) bekezdés 8. pontja hatályon kívül helyezte.
 45 A 14. § (4) bekezdését a 2018: CXXV. törvény 292. § (9) bekezdés 8. pontja hatályon kívül helyezte.
 46 A 14. § (5) bekezdését a 2018: CXXV. törvény 292. § (9) bekezdés 8. pontja hatályon kívül helyezte.
 47 A 14. § (6) bekezdését a 2018: CXXV. törvény 292. § (9) bekezdés 8. pontja hatályon kívül helyezte.
 48 A 15. §-t a 2018: CXXV. törvény 292. § (9) bekezdés 9. pontja hatályon kívül helyezte.
 49 A II. fejezet címét a 2018: CXXV. törvény 292. § (9) bekezdés 10. pontja hatályon kívül helyezte.
 50 A 16. §-t és az azt megelőző alcímet a 2011: CCI. törvény 362. § (2) bekezdése hatályon kívül helyezte.
 51 A 17. §-t megelőző alcím címet és a 17. §-t a 2018: CXXV. törvény 292. § (9) bekezdés 11. pontja hatályon kívül helyezte.
 52 A 18. §-t megelőző alcím címet és a 18. §-t a 2018: CXXV. törvény 292. § (9) bekezdés 12. pontja hatályon kívül helyezte.
 53 A 19. §-t újonnan a 2012: LXXIII. törvény 1. §-a iktatta be, hatályon kívül helyezte a 2018: CXXV. törvény 292. § (9) bekezdés 12. pontja.
 54 A 20. §-t megelőző alcím címet és a 20. §-t a 2018: CXXV. törvény 292. § (9) bekezdés 13. pontja hatályon kívül helyezte.
 55 A 21. §-t a 2011: CCI. törvény 362. § (2) bekezdése hatályon kívül helyezte.
 56 A 22. §-t és az azt megelőző alcímet a 2011: CCI. törvény 362. § (2) bekezdése hatályon kívül helyezte.
 57 A 23. §-t a 2018: CXXV. törvény 292. § (9) bekezdés 13. pontja hatályon kívül helyezte.
 58 A 23/A. §-t a 2011: CCI. törvény 360. § (21) bekezdése iktatta be, hatályon kívül helyezte a 2018: CXXV. törvény 292. § (9) bekezdés 13. pontja.
 59 A 24. §-t a 2018: CXXV. törvény 292. § (9) bekezdés 13. pontja hatályon kívül helyezte.
 60 A 25. §-t a 2018: CXXV. törvény 292. § (9) bekezdés 13. pontja hatályon kívül helyezte.
 61 A 25/A. §-t a 2011: CCI. törvény 360. § (24) bekezdése iktatta be. A 25/A. §-t megelőző alcímet a 2011: CCI. törvény 360. § (24) bekezdése iktatta be, hatályon kívül helyezte a 2018: CXXV. törvény 292. § (9) bekezdés 14. pontja.
 62 A 25/B. §-t a 2011: CCI. törvény 360. § (24) bekezdése iktatta be, hatályon kívül helyezte a 2018: CXXV. törvény 292. § (9) bekezdés 15. pontja.
 63 A 25/C. §-t a 2011: CCI. törvény 360. § (24) bekezdése iktatta be, hatályon kívül helyezte a 2018: CXXV. törvény 292. § (9) bekezdés 15. pontja.
 64 A 25/D. §-t a 2011: CCI. törvény 360. § (24) bekezdése iktatta be, hatályon kívül helyezte a 2018: CXXV. törvény 292. § (9) bekezdés 15. pontja.
 65 A 26. §-t megelőző alcím címet és a 26. §-t a 2018: CXXV. törvény 292. § (9) bekezdés 16. pontja hatályon kívül helyezte.
 66 A 27. §-t a 2011: CCI. törvény 360. § (26) bekezdése iktatta be. A 27. §-t megelőző alcím címet és a 27. §-t a 2018: CXXV. törvény 292. § (9) bekezdés 17. pontja hatályon kívül helyezte.
 67 A 28. §-t megelőző alcím címet és a 28. §-t a 2018: CXXV. törvény 292. § (9) bekezdés 18. pontja hatályon kívül helyezte.
 68 A 29. §-t a 2018: CXXV. törvény 292. § (9) bekezdés 18. pontja hatályon kívül helyezte.
 69 A 30. §-t a 2018: CXXV. törvény 292. § (9) bekezdés 18. pontja hatályon kívül helyezte.
 70 A 30/A. §-t a 2011: CCI. törvény 360. § (27) bekezdése iktatta be, hatályon kívül helyezte a 2018: CXXV. törvény 292. § (9) bekezdés 18. pontja.
 71 A 31. § a 2018: CXXV. törvény 292. § (6) bekezdésével megállapított szöveg. A 31. §-t megelőző alcím címet a 2018: CXXV. törvény 292. § (9) bekezdés 19. pontja hatályon kívül helyezte.
 72 A 32. § a 2011: CCI. törvény 360. § (29) bekezdésével megállapított szöveg. A 32. §-t megelőző alcím címet a 2018: CXXV. törvény 292. § (9) bekezdés 20. pontja hatályon kívül helyezte.
 73 A 32. § (1) bekezdését a 2018: CXXV. törvény 292. § (9) bekezdés 21. pontja hatályon kívül helyezte.
 74 A 32. § (2) bekezdése a 2012: LXXIII. törvény 3. § (1) bekezdésével megállapított, a 2018: CXXV. törvény 292. § (8) bekezdés h) pontja szerint módosított szöveg.
 75 A 32. § (3) bekezdését a 2018: CXXV. törvény 292. § (9) bekezdés 21. pontja hatályon kívül helyezte.
 76 A 32. § (4) bekezdését a 2018: CXXV. törvény 292. § (9) bekezdés 21. pontja hatályon kívül helyezte.
 77 A 32. § (5) bekezdését a 2012: LXXIII. törvény 3. § (2) bekezdése iktatta be, hatályon kívül helyezte a 2018: CXXV. törvény 292. § (9) bekezdés 21. pontja.
 78 A 32. § (6) bekezdését a 2012: LXXIII. törvény 3. § (2) bekezdése iktatta be, hatályon kívül helyezte a 2018: CXXV. törvény 292. § (9) bekezdés 21. pontja.
 79 A 33. § (1) bekezdése a 2011: CCI. törvény 362. § (1) bekezdés a) pontja, a 2018: CXXV. törvény 292. § (8) bekezdés i)–k) pontja szerint módosított szöveg.
 80 A 33. § (2) bekezdését a 2018: CXXV. törvény 292. § (9) bekezdés 22. pontja hatályon kívül helyezte.
 81 A 33. § (3) bekezdése a 2015: CXXVI. törvény 1. §-ával megállapított, a 2015: CLXV. törvény 6. § d) pontja, a 2018: CXXV. törvény 292. § (10) bekezdés b) pontja szerint módosított szöveg.
 82 A II/A. fejezetet (33/A–33/F. §) a 2018: V. törvény 24. § (7) bekezdése iktatta be, hatályon kívül helyezte a 2018: CXXV. törvény 292. § (9) bekezdés 23. pontja.
 83 A III. Fejezet címét a 2018: CXXV. törvény 292. § (9) bekezdés 24. pontja hatályon kívül helyezte.
 84 A 34. §-t megelőző alcím címet és a 34. §-t a 2018: CXXV. törvény 292. § (9) bekezdés 25. pontja hatályon kívül helyezte.
 85 A 35. §-t a 2018: CXXV. törvény 292. § (9) bekezdés 25. pontja hatályon kívül helyezte.
 86 A 36. §-t és az azt megelőző alcímet a 2014: XXI. törvény 42. § (2) bekezdés b) pontja hatályon kívül helyezte.
 87 A 37. §-t megelőző alcím címet és a 37. §-t a 2018: CXXV. törvény 292. § (9) bekezdés 26. pontja hatályon kívül helyezte.
 88 A 38. § a 2014: LXXXV. törvény 5. § (2) bekezdésével megállapított szöveg. A 38. §-t megelőző alcím címet a 2018: CXXV. törvény 292. § (9) bekezdés 27. pontja hatályon kívül helyezte.
 89 A 38. § (1) bekezdését a 2018: CXXV. törvény 292. § (9) bekezdés 28. pontja hatályon kívül helyezte.
 90 A 38. § (2) bekezdését a 2018: CXXV. törvény 292. § (9) bekezdés 28. pontja hatályon kívül helyezte.
 91 A 38. § (3) bekezdését a 2018: CXXV. törvény 292. § (9) bekezdés 28. pontja hatályon kívül helyezte.
 92 A 38. § (4) bekezdését a 2018: CXXV. törvény 292. § (9) bekezdés 28. pontja hatályon kívül helyezte.
 93 A 38. § (5) bekezdését a 2018: CXXV. törvény 292. § (9) bekezdés 28. pontja hatályon kívül helyezte.
 94 A 38. § (6) bekezdése a 2015: CXXVI. törvény 6. §-a, a 2018: CXXV. törvény 292. § (8) bekezdés l) pontja szerint módosított szöveg.
 95 A 38. § (8) bekezdését a 2018: CXXV. törvény 292. § (9) bekezdés 28. pontja hatályon kívül helyezte.
 96 A 38. § (9) bekezdése a 2018: CXXV. törvény 292. § (7) bekezdésével megállapított szöveg.
 97 A 39. §-t megelőző alcím címet a 2018: CXXV. törvény 292. § (9) bekezdés 29. pontja hatályon kívül helyezte.
 98 A 39/A. §-t a 2018: XL. törvény 41. §-a iktatta be.
 99 A 40. §-t megelőző alcím címet és a 40. §-t a 2018: CXXV. törvény 292. § (9) bekezdés 30. pontja hatályon kívül helyezte.
 100 A 41. §-t a 2018: CXXV. törvény 292. § (9) bekezdés 30. pontja hatályon kívül helyezte.
 101 A 42. §-t megelőző alcímet a 2011: CCI. törvény 362. § (2) bekezdése, a 42. §-t a 2018: CXXV. törvény 292. § (9) bekezdés 30. pontja hatályon kívül helyezte.
 102 A 43. §-t a 2018: CXXV. törvény 292. § (9) bekezdés 30. pontja hatályon kívül helyezte.
 103 A 44. §-t a 2011: CCI. törvény 362. § (2) bekezdése hatályon kívül helyezte.
 104 A 45. §-t a 2018: CXXV. törvény 292. § (9) bekezdés 30. pontja hatályon kívül helyezte.
 105 A 46. §-t a 2018: CXXV. törvény 292. § (9) bekezdés 30. pontja hatályon kívül helyezte.
 106 A 47. §-t megelőző alcím címet és a 47. §-t a 2018: CXXV. törvény 292. § (9) bekezdés 31. pontja hatályon kívül helyezte.
 107 A 48. §-t a 2011: CCI. törvény 362. § (2) bekezdése hatályon kívül helyezte.
 108 A 49. §-t megelőző alcím címet és a 49. §-t a 2018: CXXV. törvény 292. § (9) bekezdés 32. pontja hatályon kívül helyezte.
 109 Az 50. §-t a 2018: CXXV. törvény 292. § (9) bekezdés 32. pontja hatályon kívül helyezte.
 110 Az 51. §-t megelőző alcím címet a 2018: CXXV. törvény 292. § (9) bekezdés 33. pontja hatályon kívül helyezte.
 111 Az 51. § (4) bekezdése a 2011: LII. törvény 16. §-ával megállapított szöveg.
 112 Az 52. §-t megelőző alcím címet és az 52. §-t a 2018: CXXV. törvény 292. § (9) bekezdés 34. pontja hatályon kívül helyezte.
 113 Az 53. §-t megelőző alcímet a 2011: CCI. törvény 362. § (2) bekezdése hatályon kívül helyezte. Az 53. §-t a 2018: CXXV. törvény 292. § (9) bekezdés 34. pontja hatályon kívül helyezte.
 114 Az 54. §-t a 2018: CXXV. törvény 292. § (9) bekezdés 34. pontja hatályon kívül helyezte.
 115 Az 55. §-t a 2018: CXXV. törvény 292. § (9) bekezdés 34. pontja hatályon kívül helyezte.
 116 Az 56. §-t a 2011: CCI. törvény 362. § (2) bekezdése hatályon kívül helyezte.
 117 Az 57. §-t a 2018: CXXV. törvény 292. § (9) bekezdés 34. pontja hatályon kívül helyezte.
 118 Az 58. §-t a 2018: CXXV. törvény 292. § (9) bekezdés 34. pontja hatályon kívül helyezte.
 119 Az 59. §-t és az azt megelőző alcímet a 2014: XXI. törvény 42. § (2) bekezdés c) pontja hatályon kívül helyezte.
 120 A 60. §-t megelőző alcím címet és a 60. §-t a 2018: CXXV. törvény 292. § (9) bekezdés 35. pontja hatályon kívül helyezte.
 121 A 61. §-t a 2018: CXXV. törvény 292. § (9) bekezdés 35. pontja hatályon kívül helyezte.
 122 A 62. §-t a 2018: CXXV. törvény 292. § (9) bekezdés 35. pontja hatályon kívül helyezte.
 123 A 62/A. §-t a 2013: CCLI. törvény 17. §-a iktatta be, hatályon kívül helyezte a 2018: CXXV. törvény 292. § (9) bekezdés 35. pontja.
 124 A 63. §-t a 2018: CXXV. törvény 292. § (9) bekezdés 35. pontja hatályon kívül helyezte.
 125 A 63/A. §-t a 2018: V. törvény 24. § (13) bekezdése iktatta be, hatályon kívül helyezte a 2018: CXXV. törvény 292. § (9) bekezdés 35. pontja.
 126 A 64. §-t a 2018: CXXV. törvény 292. § (9) bekezdés 35. pontja hatályon kívül helyezte.
 127 A 65. §-t a 2018: CXXV. törvény 292. § (9) bekezdés 35. pontja hatályon kívül helyezte.
 128 A 66. §-t a 2018: CXXV. törvény 292. § (9) bekezdés 35. pontja hatályon kívül helyezte.
 129 A 67. §-t a 2018: CXXV. törvény 292. § (9) bekezdés 35. pontja hatályon kívül helyezte.
 130 A 68. §-t a 2018: CXXV. törvény 292. § (9) bekezdés 35. pontja hatályon kívül helyezte.
 131 A 69. §-t és az azt megelőző alcímet a 2014: XXI. törvény 42. § (2) bekezdés e) pontja hatályon kívül helyezte.
 132 A IV. Fejezetet (70–73/B. §-t) a 2018: CXXV. törvény 292. § (9) bekezdés 36. pontja hatályon kívül helyezte.
 133 A 73/A. §-t újonnan a 2015: CXCI. törvény 2. §-a iktatta be.
 134 A 73/B. §-t a 2015: CXCI. törvény 2. §-a iktatta be.
 135 A 74. §-t és az V. fejezet címét a 90. § hatályon kívül helyezte.
 136 A 75. §-t meglőző alcím a 2011: CCI. törvény 360. § (55) bekezdésével megállapított szöveg.
 137 A 75. § (1) bekezdését a 2018: CXXV. törvény 292. § (9) bekezdés 37. pontja hatályon kívül helyezte.
 138 A 75. § (2) bekezdését a 2018: CXXV. törvény 292. § (9) bekezdés 37. pontja hatályon kívül helyezte.
 139 A 75. § (3) bekezdését a 2018: CXXV. törvény 292. § (9) bekezdés 37. pontja hatályon kívül helyezte.
 140 A 75. § (4) bekezdését a 2018: CXXV. törvény 292. § (9) bekezdés 37. pontja hatályon kívül helyezte.
 141 A 75. § (4a) bekezdését a 2010: XC. törvény 91. § (5) bekezdése iktatta be, hatályon kívül helyezte a 2018: CXXV. törvény 292. § (9) bekezdés 37. pontja.
 142 A 75. § (4b) bekezdését a 2014: XXI. törvény 40. §-a iktatta be.
 143 Lásd a 152/2014. (VI. 6.) Korm. rendeletet, a 93/2018. (V. 4.) Korm. rendeletet.
 144 A 75. § (5) bekezdését a 2014: LXXXV. törvény 6. § b) pontja hatályon kívül helyezte.
 145 A 76. §-t megelőző alcím a 2011: CCI. törvény 360. § (56) bekezdésével megállapított szöveg.
 146 A 77. §-t és az azt megelőző alcímet a 2011: CCI. törvény 362. § (2) bekezdése hatályon kívül helyezte.
 147 A 78. §-t a 2011: CCI. törvény 362. § (2) bekezdése hatályon kívül helyezte.
 148 A 79. §-t a 2011: CCI. törvény 362. § (2) bekezdése hatályon kívül helyezte.
 149 A 80. §-t a 2011: CCI. törvény 362. § (2) bekezdése hatályon kívül helyezte.
 150 A 81. §-t a 2011: CCI. törvény 362. § (2) bekezdése hatályon kívül helyezte.
 151 A 82. §-t a 2011: CCI. törvény 362. § (2) bekezdése hatályon kívül helyezte.
 152 A 83. §-t a 2011: CCI. törvény 362. § (2) bekezdése hatályon kívül helyezte.
 153 A 84. §-t a 2011: CXII. törvény 87. § (3) bekezdése hatályon kívül helyezte.
 154 A 85. §-t a 2010: CXXVI. törvény 98. §-a hatályon kívül helyezte.
 155 A 86. §-t a 2011: CCI. törvény 362. § (2) bekezdése hatályon kívül helyezte.
 156 A 87. §-t a 2011: CCI. törvény 362. § (2) bekezdése hatályon kívül helyezte.
 157 A 88. §-t a 2011: CCI. törvény 362. § (2) bekezdése hatályon kívül helyezte.
 158 A 89. §-t a 2011: CCI. törvény 362. § (2) bekezdése hatályon kívül helyezte.
 159 A 90. §-t a 2011: CCI. törvény 362. § (2) bekezdése hatályon kívül helyezte.
 160 A 91. § (1) bekezdését a 2011: CCI. törvény 362. § (2) bekezdése hatályon kívül helyezte.
 161 A 91. § (3) bekezdését a 2011: CCI. törvény 362. § (2) bekezdése hatályon kívül helyezte, újonnan a 2012: CXL. törvény 1. § (2) bekezdése iktatta be.
 162 A 91. § (4) bekezdése a 2011: CCI. törvény 361. § (2) bekezdés u) pontja szerint módosított szöveg.
 163 A 91. § (5) bekezdése a 2011: CCI. törvény 361. § (2) bekezdés v) pontja szerint módosított szöveg.
 164 A 91. § (6) bekezdését a 2010: CXLVIII. törvény 262. §-a iktatta be.
 165 A 92. §-t a 2018: XL. törvény 42. §-a iktatta be.


type: legislation

jurisdiction: EU

text:
 29.11.2011
 SK
 Úradný vestník Európskej únie
 L 314/29
 VYKONÁVACIE NARIADENIE KOMISIE (EÚ) č. 1226/2011
 z 28. novembra 2011,
 ktorým sa ustanovujú paušálne dovozné hodnoty na určovanie vstupných cien niektorých druhov ovocia a zeleniny
 EURÓPSKA KOMISIA,
 so zreteľom na Zmluvu o fungovaní Európskej únie,
 so zreteľom na nariadenie Rady (ES) č. 1234/2007 z 22. októbra 2007 o vytvorení spoločnej organizácie poľnohospodárskych trhov a o osobitných ustanoveniach pre určité poľnohospodárske výrobky (nariadenie o jednotnej spoločnej organizácii trhov) (1),
 so zreteľom na vykonávacie nariadenie Komisie (EÚ) č. 543/2011 zo 7. júna 2011, ktorým sa ustanovujú podrobné pravidlá vykonávania nariadenia Rady (ES) č. 1234/2007, pokiaľ ide o sektory ovocia a zeleniny a spracovaného ovocia a zeleniny (2), a najmä na jeho článok 136 ods. 1,
 keďže:
 Vykonávacím nariadením (EÚ) č. 543/2011 sa v súlade s výsledkami Uruguajského kola mnohostranných obchodných rokovaní ustanovujú kritériá, na základe ktorých Komisia stanovuje paušálne hodnoty na dovoz z tretích krajín, pokiaľ ide o výrobky a obdobia uvedené v časti A prílohy XVI k uvedenému nariadeniu,
 PRIJALA TOTO NARIADENIE:
 Článok 1
 Paušálne dovozné hodnoty uvedené v článku 136 vykonávacieho nariadenia (EÚ) č. 543/2011 sú stanovené v prílohe k tomuto nariadeniu.
 Článok 2
 Toto nariadenie nadobúda účinnosť 29. novembra 2011.
 Toto nariadenie je záväzné v celom rozsahu a priamo uplatniteľné vo všetkých členských štátoch.
 V Bruseli 28. novembra 2011
 Za Komisiu v mene predsedu
 José Manuel SILVA RODRÍGUEZ
 generálny riaditeľ pre poľnohospodárstvo a rozvoj vidieka
 (1) Ú. v. EÚ L 299, 16.11.2007, s. 1.
 (2) Ú. v. EÚ L 157, 15.6.2011, s. 1.
 PRÍLOHA
 Paušálne dovozné hodnoty na určovanie vstupných cien niektorých druhov ovocia a zeleniny
 (EUR/100 kg)
 Číselný znak KN
 Kód tretej krajiny (1)
 Paušálna dovozná hodnota
 0702 00 00
 AL
 59,8
 IL
 98,1
 MA
 52,7
 TN
 143,0
 TR
 82,9
 ZZ
 87,3
 0707 00 05
 EG
 188,1
 TR
 108,0
 ZZ
 148,1
 0709 90 70
 MA
 36,3
 TR
 131,9
 ZZ
 84,1
 0805 20 10
 MA
 67,0
 ZZ
 67,0
 0805 20 30, 0805 20 50, 0805 20 70, 0805 20 90
 HR
 50,4
 IL
 77,8
 TR
 76,7
 ZZ
 68,3
 0805 50 10
 TR
 59,7
 ZA
 49,5
 ZZ
 54,6
 0808 10 80
 CA
 104,5
 CL
 90,0
 CN
 74,9
 MK
 36,4
 NZ
 41,5
 US
 134,2
 ZA
 148,1
 ZZ
 89,9
 0808 20 50
 CN
 72,7
 TR
 137,2
 ZZ
 105,0
 (1) Nomenklatúra krajín stanovená nariadením Komisie (ES) č. 1833/2006 (Ú. v. EÚ L 354, 14.12.2006, s. 19). Kód „ZZ“ znamená „iného pôvodu“.


jurisdiction: US

text: b' OFFICE OF\n THE INSPECTOR GENERAL\n\nSOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION\n\n\n IMPLEMENTATION OF\n WORKERS\xe2\x80\x99 COMPENSATION IN TITLE II\n REDESIGN RELEASE 3\n\n June 2006 A-14-06-16049\n\n\n\n\n AUDIT REPORT\n\x0c Mission\nWe improve SSA programs and operations and protect them against fraud, waste,\nand abuse by conducting independent and objective audits, evaluations, and\ninvestigations. We provide timely, useful, and reliable information and advice to\nAdministration officials, the Congress, and the public.\n\n Authority\nThe Inspector General Act created independent audit and investigative units,\ncalled the Office of Inspector General (OIG). The mission of the OIG, as spelled\nout in the Act, is to:\n\n \xc2\x81 Conduct and supervise independent and objective audits and\n investigations relating to agency programs and operations.\n \xc2\x81 Promote economy, effectiveness, and efficiency within the agency.\n \xc2\x81 Prevent and detect fraud, waste, and abuse in agency programs and\n operations.\n \xc2\x81 Review and make recommendations regarding existing and proposed\n legislation and regulations relating to agency programs and operations.\n \xc2\x81 Keep the agency head and the Congress fully and currently informed of\n problems in agency programs and operations.\n\n To ensure objectivity, the IG Act empowers the IG with:\n\n \xc2\x81 Independence to determine what reviews to perform.\n \xc2\x81 Access to all information necessary for the reviews.\n \xc2\x81 Authority to publish findings and recommendations based on the reviews.\n\n Vision\nBy conducting independent and objective audits, investigations, and evaluations,\nwe are agents of positive change striving for continuous improvement in the\nSocial Security Administration\'s programs, operations, and management and in\nour own office.\n\x0c SOCIAL SECURITY\nMEMORANDUM\n\nDate: June 15, 2006 Refer To:\n\nTo: The Commissioner\n\nFrom: Inspector General\n\nSubject: Implementation of Workers\xe2\x80\x99 Compensation in Title II Redesign Release 3\n (A-14-06-16049)\n\n\n OBJECTIVE\n The objective of our review was to assess whether the changes to the Workers\xe2\x80\x99\n Compensation portion of the Title II Initial Claim applications and the Post-Entitlement\n System made in the Title II Redesign Release 3 project worked as intended.\n\n BACKGROUND\n\n The Social Security Act (the Act) provides that when a Title II 1 disability insurance\n beneficiary under age 65 also receives public disability benefits, which includes\n Workers\xe2\x80\x99 Compensation, the disability insurance benefit may be reduced. 2 An offset for\n concurrent receipt of Workers\xe2\x80\x99 Compensation was contained in the original 1956 Social\n Security disability program, eliminated in 1958, and reinstituted in 1965. 3 The Act\n requires that disability benefits be reduced when the worker is also eligible for periodic\n or lump-sum Workers\xe2\x80\x99 Compensation payments, so that the combined amount of\n Workers\xe2\x80\x99 Compensation and Social Security disability benefits do not exceed 80 percent\n of the worker\xe2\x80\x99s average current earnings. 4 The combined payments after the reduction,\n however, will never be less than the amount of Social Security disability benefits before\n the reduction. 5\n\n\n\n 1\n Federal Old-Age, Survivors, and Disability Insurance Benefits.\n 2\n The Social Security Act \xc2\xa7 224, 42 U.S.C. \xc2\xa7 424a.\n 3\n Reno, Virginia; Williams, Cecili Thompson; Sengupta, Ishita, \xe2\x80\x9cWorkers\xe2\x80\x99 Compensation, Social Security\n Disability Insurance, and the Offset: A Fact Sheet,\xe2\x80\x9d Social Security Bulletin, Vol. 65 No. 4, 2003/2004,\n (May 2005) p. 3.\n 4\n 42 U.S.C. \xc2\xa7 424a.\n 5\n Id.\n\x0cPage 2 - The Commissioner\n\n\nPrevious audits performed by the Social Security Administration\xe2\x80\x99s (SSA) Office of the\nInspector General (OIG) revealed problems and vulnerabilities in the calculation and\nmanagement of Title II cases involving Workers\xe2\x80\x99 Compensation. The causes of the\nproblems revealed were due to human errors, such as: (1) claims authorizers not\nproperly verifying Workers\xe2\x80\x99 Compensation case information; (2) calculation errors;\n(3) beneficiaries not providing complete Workers\xe2\x80\x99 Compensation information to SSA;\nand (4) the need for more staff training. OIG recommendations were directed toward\nimproving the process, such as: (1) strengthening internal controls; (2) increasing front-\nend reviews; (3) reducing back-logged Workers\xe2\x80\x99 Compensation cases; (4) automating\nmanual processes; (5) verifying Workers\xe2\x80\x99 Compensation information to be input by\nclaims authorizers; and (6) strengthening training.\n\nTitle II System Redesign\n\nSSA implemented Title II Redesign Release 3 (Release 3) in June 2004 to improve the\nTitle II Initial Claim applications and Post-Entitlement System processing, including\nWorkers\xe2\x80\x99 Compensation. SSA\'s goal was to expand business automation, reduce\nmanual tasks, improve the quality of the data stored on the master records, and reduce\nthe number of exceptions to be worked by program service center (PSC) technicians.\nIn Release 3, Workers\xe2\x80\x99 Compensation processes were streamlined to reduce manual\nactions and the Master Beneficiary Record (MBR) was expanded to include more\nWorkers\xe2\x80\x99 Compensation information.\n\nRESULTS OF REVIEW\nOur review found that the system calculated offset amounts as intended. Additionally\nusers were satisfied with a number of Workers\xe2\x80\x99 Compensation enhancements made in\nRelease 3, such as:\n\n \xe2\x80\xa2 elimination of an additional step previously required to trigger Workers\xe2\x80\x99\n Compensation transactions,\n \xe2\x80\xa2 widely accessible common screens,\n \xe2\x80\xa2 expanded information on the MBR,\n \xe2\x80\xa2 automation of some manual actions, and\n \xe2\x80\xa2 availability of more electronic documentation about the client.\n\nHowever, our review found a significant number of exceptions were still produced that\nrequire manual processing by PSC staff, and users would like Workers\xe2\x80\x99 Compensation\nnotices improved.\n\x0cPage 3 - The Commissioner\n\n\nRedesigned System Calculated Offset Correctly\n\nThe Title II system accurately processed the Workers\xe2\x80\x99 Compensation transactions and\ncomputed the expected offset results for the scenarios we tested. We tested\n61 Workers\' Compensation transactions, consisting of 52 initial claims and\n9 post-entitlement actions. Based on our analysis, the 61 scenarios we selected for\ntesting represented the possible variations of Workers\xe2\x80\x99 Compensation transactions for\nwhich an offset amount is calculated in the Title II system. We tested transactions from\nNovember 2005 through February 2006. 6 Our results consisted of 116 beneficiaries\nwhose Title II benefit payments were totally offset, partially offset, or not offset, as\nshown in the table below. (For additional information about our scope, methodology\nand testing results, see Appendix B.)\n\n Summary Table: Workers\xe2\x80\x99 Compensation Scenarios Tested\n Offset Offset Not\n Total\n Type of Action Computed\n Scenarios Computed Correctly Correctly\n Number\n 52 0\n holder\n\n Initial Claims 52 Auxiliary 50 0\n Number\n 9 0\n holder\n Post-entitlement\n Actions 9 Auxiliary 5 0\n Number\n 61 0\n holder\n Total Scenarios 61\n Auxiliary 55 0\n Total 116 0\n\n\nBecause of the accuracy of the systems-calculated offset amounts, SSA should\ncontinue to automate as many of the Workers\xe2\x80\x99 Compensation actions currently excluded\nfrom automated processing as is cost effective. An example of a case where the\nWorkers\xe2\x80\x99 Compensation action must be processed manually is when a child auxiliary is\nsimultaneously entitled on more than one record. The Workers\' Compensation screens\ndo not allow Agency staff to input the change in the maximum benefit payable. The\nmodified maximum benefit payable data is required to ensure the offset amount is\ncalculated correctly by the Title II system.\n\nSSA staff we interviewed in PSCs, field offices, and headquarters stated they would like\nfor the system to handle excluded cases because these cases are labor intensive and\nsubject to errors. The President\'s 2007 budget includes a proposal to simplify the\nWorkers\xe2\x80\x99 Compensation offset computation. We think that, if enacted, implementation\n\n\n6\n Testing took place in the Agency\xe2\x80\x99s Title II validation environment.\n\x0cPage 4 - The Commissioner\n\n\nof this proposal should improve the Agency\xe2\x80\x99s use of administrative resources and\nreduce errors in Workers\xe2\x80\x99 Compensation transaction processing.\n\nSignificant Number of Exceptions Produced\n\nPSC staff must manually process Workers\xe2\x80\x99 Compensation exceptions produced by the\nTitle II system and there are a significant number of these exceptions. Based on\nRelease 3 statistics, 44.1 percent of the input Workers\xe2\x80\x99 Compensation actions\nprocessed in 2004 ended in a system exception and 41.5 percent processed in 2005\nended in a system exception. 7 Additional costs associated with manual processing\nresult when system exceptions occur. One of the stated goals in the Project Scope\nAgreement for Release 3 was to reduce the number of exceptions to be worked by PSC\ntechnicians by 50 percent.\n\nExceptions usually result when the system detects something is inconsistent with either\nthe existing or attempted entry of new data on the MBR. We understand from Agency\nstaff that the complex nature of Workers\xe2\x80\x99 Compensation transactions causes more\nexceptions to occur than for most other types of Title II actions. The Agency should\ncontinue to enhance the Title II system to reduce the number of system exceptions\ngenerated.\n\nUsers Would Like to See Notices Enhanced\n\nUsers we interviewed identified Workers\xe2\x80\x99 Compensation notices as an area of the\nredesigned system that should be improved. 8 A concern with Release 3 notices\nreported by the users was that incomplete Workers\xe2\x80\x99 Compensation information is\nprovided to clients. Inadequate notices result in Agency staff spending additional\nworkyears following up with clients to provide them with additional claims information.\n\nAfter Release 3, the Agency formed a Title II collaborative workgroup to improve\ncommunication between components about notice issues and to avoid notice problems\nin the future. The workgroup developed recommendations to improve notices. For\nexample, there was concurrence that an ongoing review of production notices was\nneeded. Also, there was agreement by the workgroup that the means of tracking notice\nerrors and deficiencies could be improved.\n\nThe Agency\xe2\x80\x99s Project Resource Guide for systems development lifecycle guidance\nrequires the validation of software with user acceptance before implementation, which\n\n7\n According to statistics obtained from SSA\xe2\x80\x99s Office of Retirement and Survivors Insurance Systems web\nsite, in Calendar Year 2004 after the Title II Redesign, 32,158 out of 72,842 Workers\xe2\x80\x99 Compensation\npost-entitlement actions entered through the Interactive Computation Facility ended in a system\nexception. In Calendar Year 2005, 48,967 out of 117,921 transactions ended in a system exception. The\nnumber of manual Workers\xe2\x80\x99 Compensation actions processed directly through the Manual Adjustment\nCredit and Award Data Entry System by PSC staff is not included in these statistics.\n8\n A notice is a letter sent to a client to explain any decision made on the client\xe2\x80\x99s behalf. Notices are\nrequired for any appealable decision, including initial determinations and post-entitlement actions.\n\x0cPage 5 - The Commissioner\n\n\nincludes notices software. However, SSA staff we interviewed believe that they needed\nmore time to adequately validate notices in Release 3. In their opinion, they did not\nhave enough time to validate the more difficult cases, while time was available to\nvalidate the easier cases. According to Agency managers, notices are usually validated\nlast after other systems changes are made and validated. Thus, when project deadlines\nare set and projects are behind schedule, sufficient time is not always available for\nvalidating notices. The limited time to validate notices resulted from moving Agency\npersonnel working on Release 3 to implement systems required to administer the new\nMedicare legislation. As a result, numerous emergency fixes were released to the\nproduction environment to resolve some of the notice problems and some notice\nproblems still remain.\n\nThe Agency should allow sufficient time to validate notices in future software releases to\nensure they meet the users\xe2\x80\x99 requirements. Additionally, the Title II collaborative\nworkgroup should continue to meet regularly and obtain feedback from operational\nusers, taking necessary steps to address their concerns about system-generated\nnotices.\n\nCONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS\nThe Title II Redesign Release 3 software provided a number of enhancements to\nstreamline the processing of Workers\xe2\x80\x99 Compensation claims by SSA staff. Release 3\naccurately computed and processed the beneficiaries\xe2\x80\x99 offset amounts for each case we\ntested. However, a significant number of Workers\xe2\x80\x99 Compensation exceptions are still\nproduced requiring action by PSC staff, and Workers\xe2\x80\x99 Compensation notices need\nimprovement. To assist the Agency in achieving its strategic objective of improving\nservice through technology and preventing improper payments, we recommend SSA:\n\n 1. Automate as many types of Workers\xe2\x80\x99 Compensation actions currently excluded\n from automated processing as SSA determines is cost effective.\n\n 2. Work to enhance the Title II system to reduce the number of exceptions\n generated for PSC action.\n\n 3. Obtain feedback from operational users and take necessary steps to address\n their continuing concerns about system-generated notices.\n\n 4. Ensure that cross-component coordination continues related to Title II notice\n issues and that problems are resolved timely as identified.\n\n 5. Allow adequate time to validate notices in future software releases to ensure they\n meet the users\xe2\x80\x99 requirements.\n\x0cPage 6 - The Commissioner\n\n\nAGENCY COMMENTS\nSSA agreed with our recommendations. See Appendix D for the text of SSA\xe2\x80\x99s\ncomments.\n\n\n\n\n S\n Patrick P. O\xe2\x80\x99Carroll, Jr.\n\x0c Appendices\nAPPENDIX A \xe2\x80\x93 Acronyms\n\nAPPENDIX B \xe2\x80\x93 Scope, Methodology and Test Results\n\nAPPENDIX C \xe2\x80\x93 Background\n\nAPPENDIX D \xe2\x80\x93 Agency Comments\n\nAPPENDIX E \xe2\x80\x93 OIG Contacts and Staff Acknowledgments\n\x0c Appendix A\n\nAcronyms\nMBR Master Beneficiary Record\nOIG Office of the Inspector General\nPSC Program Service Center\nRelease 3 Title II Redesign Release 3\nSSA Social Security Administration\nThe Act Social Security Act\n\x0c Appendix B\n\nScope, Methodology and Test Results\nWe conducted our review between November 2005 and February 2006 in Baltimore,\nMaryland. The principal entity audited was the Social Security Administration\xe2\x80\x99s (SSA)\nOffice of Retirement and Survivors Insurance Systems under the Deputy Commissioner\nfor Systems. We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted\ngovernment auditing standards.\n\nTo meet our objective, we:\n \xe2\x80\xa2 reviewed applicable criteria;\n \xe2\x80\xa2 reviewed systems documentation;\n \xe2\x80\xa2 interviewed SSA staff involved in the software development effort, (Office of\n Systems, Office of Operations and Office of Disability and Income Security\n Programs);\n \xe2\x80\xa2 interviewed users from the Office of Operations, program service centers and\n field offices; and\n \xe2\x80\xa2 tested Title II Workers\xe2\x80\x99 Compensation scenarios in the Title II validation system\n environment.\n\nTo determine whether the changes to Workers\xe2\x80\x99 Compensation made with the Title II\nRedesign Release 3 (Release 3) project worked as intended, we tested the Title II\nSystem\xe2\x80\x99s calculation of Workers\xe2\x80\x99 Compensation offsets. We tested scenarios in SSA\xe2\x80\x99s\nsystems validation region from November 2005 through February 2006. Specifically,\nwe developed test scenarios in four categories: 1) claimants with dependents,\n2) claimants without dependents, 3) claimants who received a lump-sum award with\ndependents, and 4) claimants who received a lump-sum award without dependents.\n\nWe tested a total of 61 scenarios, consisting of 52 initial claims and 9 post-entitlement\nactions. For initial claims processes, our results consisted of 102 beneficiaries whose\nTitle II benefit payments were totally offset, partially offset, or not offset (see Table 1).\nFor post-entitlement actions, our results consisted of 14 beneficiaries whose Title II\nbenefit payments were totally offset, partially offset, or not offset (see Table 2). Based\non our analysis, the 61 scenarios we selected for testing represented the possible\nvariations of Workers\xe2\x80\x99 Compensation transactions for which an offset amount is\ncalculated in the Title II system. Based on the scenarios, we independently calculated\noffset results, and compared the results to the computations made by the Title II\nSystem, noting any variances.\n\n\n\n\n B-1\n\x0c Table 1: Workers\xe2\x80\x99 Compensation Initial Claim Scenarios Tested\n Offset Offset Not\n Total\n Type of Action Computed\n Scenarios Computed Correctly Correctly\nNumber Holders Number\n 15 0\nReceiving Periodic Holders\n 15\nPayments With\nAuxiliaries Auxiliaries 30 0\nNumber Holders Number\nReceiving Periodic Holders\n 16 16 0\nPayments Without without\nAuxiliaries auxiliaries\nNumber Holders Number\n 10 0\nReceiving Lump-Sum Holders\n 10\nPayment With\nAuxiliaries Auxiliaries 20 0\nNumber Holders Number\nReceiving Lump-Sum Holders\n 11 11 0\nPayment Without without\nAuxiliaries auxiliaries\n Number\n 52 0\n Holders\nTotal Initial Claim 52\n Auxiliaries 50 0\n Total 102 0\n\n\n\n\n B-2\n\x0c Table 2: Workers\xe2\x80\x99 Compensation Post-Entitlement Scenarios Tested\n Offset Offset Not\n Total\n Type of Action Computed\n Scenarios Computed Correctly Correctly\nPeriodic Payment\n 2 Number holder 2 0\nChange\n 1 Number holder 1 0\nPayment Ended\nLump-Sum Payment\n 1 Number holder 1 0\nReceived\n Number holder 1 0\nAuxiliary Coming Off 1\nRecord Auxiliary 1 0\nAdditional Federal\n 1 Number holder 1 0\nPayment Received\n Number holder 1 0\nAuxiliaries Added to 1\nRecord \xe2\x80\x93 Lump-Sum Auxiliary 2 0\n Number holder 1 0\nAuxiliaries Added to 1\nRecord \xe2\x80\x93 Periodic Auxiliary 2 0\nPayment Started 1 Number holder 1 0\n Number holder 9 0\nTotal Post-Entitlement 9 Auxiliary 5 0\n Total 14 0\n\n\nThe following versions of Title II software were tested:\n\n \xe2\x80\xa2 Modernized Claims System, Version ICR4.2\n \xe2\x80\xa2 Interactive Computation Facility, Version MMA2.2\n \xe2\x80\xa2 Master Beneficiary Record, Version 14.1\n \xe2\x80\xa2 Title II Rates, Version MMA2.2\n \xe2\x80\xa2 Workers\xe2\x80\x99 Compensation Data File, Version R1.\n\n\n\n\n B-3\n\x0c Appendix C\n\nBackground\nOffset Provision and Lump-Sum Settlement Provision\n\nA Social Security Bulletin article 9 described the Workers\xe2\x80\x99 Compensation offset provision\nas follows:\n\n The intent of the Workers\xe2\x80\x99 Compensation offset provision is to ensure that the\n combined benefits from Workers\xe2\x80\x99 Compensation and Social Security are not\n excessive. The offset of Disability Insurance benefits applies to disabled workers\n under the age of 65 and their families. Benefits for a workers\xe2\x80\x99 spouse or dependent\n children are offset before the offset is applied to the workers\xe2\x80\x99 benefit. Under the\n 1965 law, the Social Security disability benefit will not be reduced if the State\n Workers\xe2\x80\x99 Compensation law or plan provided for a reverse offset (a reduction of the\n Workers\xe2\x80\x99 Compensation benefit of a worker also receiving Disability Insurance).\n\n The Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1981 (Public Law 97-35) ended the\n option for additional states to adopt reverse offsets. It also extended the Social\n Security disability offset to apply to certain public disability benefits paid by federal,\n state, or local governments. In particular, it applies to disability benefits that are\n earned in employment that is not covered by Social Security\xe2\x80\x94for example, in jobs\n covered by the California Public Employees\' Retirement System and not by Social\n Security. At the time of the 1981 legislation, 16 States and Puerto Rico had reverse\n offset statutes, which remain today.\n\n When a Workers\' Compensation law provides for periodic payments but permits a\n lump-sum settlement that discharges the liability of the insurer or the employer, the\n settlement is subject to the offset. In this case, the lump-sum is prorated to reflect\n the monthly rate that would have been paid had the lump-sum award not been\n made. Medical and legal expenses incurred by the worker in connection with\n Workers\' Compensation may be excluded when computing the offset.\n\nTitle II Redesign Release 3 Enhancements to Workers\xe2\x80\x99 Compensation Processing\n\nBefore Release 3, user inputs made to the Workers\xe2\x80\x99 Compensation computation facility\nhad to be processed in a post-entitlement on-line system to be adjudicated. Because of\nthis, a technician had to go into the on-line system to adjudicate previously keyed\nWorkers\xe2\x80\x99 Compensation actions and could possibly have missed taking this step.\n\n9\n Reno, Virginia; Williams, Cecili Thompson; Sengupta, Ishita, Workers\xe2\x80\x99 Compensation, Social Security\nDisability Insurance, and the Offset: A Fact Sheet, Social Security Bulletin, Vol. 65 No. 4, 2003/2004,\n(May 2005) p. 3.\n\n C-1\n\x0cRelease 3 eliminated this step since adjudication of Workers\xe2\x80\x99 Compensation\ntransactions can now take place using the Workers\xe2\x80\x99 Compensation computation facility.\n\nRelease 3 also included the implementation of an on-line operation that eliminated the\nneed to create a paper form for use by program service center (PSC) staff to process\ncomplex Workers\xe2\x80\x99 Compensation actions manually. Instead, PSC staff can now access\nthe on-line operation and use data previously keyed to develop the manual cases\nexcluded from automated processing. An example of a case where the Workers\xe2\x80\x99\nCompensation action must be processed manually in a PSC is when a child auxiliary is\nsimultaneously entitled on more than one record.\n\n\n\n\n C-2\n\x0c Appendix D\n\nAgency Comments\n\x0c SOCIAL SECURITY\n\n\nMEMORANDUM\n\n\nDate: June 2, 2006 Refer To: S1J-3\n\nTo: Patrick P. O\'Carroll, Jr.\n Inspector General\n\nFrom: Larry W. Dye /s/\n Chief of Staff\n\nSubject Office of the Inspector General (OIG) Draft Report, "Implementation of Workers\xe2\x80\x99 Compensation\n in Title II Redesign Release 3\xe2\x80\x9d (A-14-06-16049)--INFORMATION\n\n We appreciate OIG\xe2\x80\x99s efforts in conducting this review. Our comments on the draft report are\n attached.\n\n Please let me know if you have any questions. Staff inquiries may be directed to\n Ms. Candace Skurnik, Director, Audit Management and Liaison Staff, at extension 54636.\n\n Attachment:\n SSA Comments\n\n\n\n\n D-1\n\x0cCOMMENTS ON THE OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL (OIG) DRAFT\nREPORT, \xe2\x80\x9cIMPLEMENTATION OF WORKER\xe2\x80\x99S COMPENSATION IN TITLE II\nREDESIGN RELEASE 3 (A-14-06-16049)\n\nThank you for the opportunity to review and provide comments on this OIG draft report. As\nnoted in the draft report, the Social Security Administration (SSA) implemented Title II\nRedesign Release 3 (Release 3) in June 2004 to improve the Title II Initial Claim applications\nand Post-Entitlement System processing, including Workers\xe2\x80\x99 Compensation (WC) case\nprocessing. Our goal continues to be to expand business automation, reduce manual tasks,\nimprove the quality of the data stored on the master records, and reduce the number of\nexceptions to be worked by program service center (PSC) technicians. In Release 3, WC\nprocesses were streamlined to reduce manual actions and the Master Beneficiary Record (MBR)\nwas expanded to include more WC information. We continue to explore cost-effective\nalternatives for enhancing automated processing of WC cases.\n\nWe believe most of the processing exceptions occurring in WC cases are not related to WC\nfunctionality that is not supported in the Title II system, but rather are primarily the result of\nother factors such as the involvement of dual entitlement, the fact that the action being taken\ninvolves more than the 4 years of retroactivity handled by the Title II system, or that the Master\nBeneficiary Record (MBR) for the transaction in question has errors on it that prevent automated\nprocessing. However, we agree we should continue work to increase the processing capabilities\nof the Title II system and reduce the number of manual transactions our operations components\nmust perform.\n\nRecommendation 1\n\nAutomate as many types of WC actions currently excluded from automated processing as SSA\ndetermines is cost effective.\n\nComment\n\nWe agree. Considerable progress has been made in reducing the number of WC processing\nexceptions with each new release to the Title II Redesign. We are also exploring the cost-\neffectiveness of further enhancing the Title II system to reduce the number of WC processing\nexceptions. As part of this effort, we are evaluating recommendations for enhancing the\nInteractive Computation system.\n\nRecommendation 2\n\nWork to enhance the Title II system to reduce the number of exceptions generated for PSC\naction.\n\n\n\n\n D-2\n\x0cComment\n\nWe agree. See response to recommendation 1.\n\nRecommendation 3\n\nObtain feedback from operational users and take necessary steps to address their continuing\nconcerns about system-generated notices.\n\nComment\n\nWe agree with the need for obtaining input from operational users and continuing cross-\ncomponent coordination to enhance our beneficiary notices. To promote this coordination, we\nare scheduling quarterly meetings of representatives from our operations, policy, and systems\noffices. Agenda items include topics such as the effect of legislation on notices, the notice\nclearance process, and outstanding notice issues. We believe such coordination will facilitate\nearly recognition and resolution of notice issues.\n\nRecommendation 4\n\nEnsure that cross-component coordination continues related to Title II notice issues and that\nproblems are resolved timely as identified.\n\nComment\n\nWe agree. See response to recommendation 3.\n\nRecommendation 5\n\nAllow adequate time to validate notices in future software releases to ensure they meet the users\'\nrequirements.\n\nComment\n\nWe agree. We will allow the appropriate amount of time to validate notices for future software\nreleases.\n\n[In addition to the comments above, SSA provided technical comments which have been addressed in\nthis report.]\n\n\n\n\n D-3\n\x0c Appendix E\n\nOIG Contacts and Staff Acknowledgments\nOIG Contacts\n\n Kitt Winter, Director, Data Analysis and Technology Audits Division, (410) 965-9702\n\n Al Darago, Audit Manager, Application Controls, (410) 965-9710\n\n\nAcknowledgments\n\nIn addition to those named above:\n\n Deborah Kinsey, Auditor-in-Charge\n\n Ronald Anderson, Auditor\n\n Annette DeRito, Writer-Editor\n\nFor additional copies of this report, please visit our web site at\nwww.socialsecurity.gov/oig or contact the Office of the Inspector General\xe2\x80\x99s Public\nAffairs Specialist at (410) 965-3218. Refer to Common Identification Number A-14-06-\n16049.\n\x0c DISTRIBUTION SCHEDULE\n\nCommissioner of Social Security\nOffice of Management and Budget, Income Maintenance Branch\nChairman and Ranking Member, Committee on Ways and Means\nChief of Staff, Committee on Ways and Means\nChairman and Ranking Minority Member, Subcommittee on Social Security\nMajority and Minority Staff Director, Subcommittee on Social Security\nChairman and Ranking Minority Member, Subcommittee on Human Resources\nChairman and Ranking Minority Member, Committee on Budget, House of\nRepresentatives\nChairman and Ranking Minority Member, Committee on Government Reform and\nOversight\nChairman and Ranking Minority Member, Committee on Governmental Affairs\nChairman and Ranking Minority Member, Committee on Appropriations, House of\nRepresentatives\nChairman and Ranking Minority, Subcommittee on Labor, Health and Human Services,\nEducation and Related Agencies, Committee on Appropriations,\n House of Representatives\nChairman and Ranking Minority Member, Committee on Appropriations, U.S. Senate\nChairman and Ranking Minority Member, Subcommittee on Labor, Health and Human\nServices, Education and Related Agencies, Committee on Appropriations, U.S. Senate\nChairman and Ranking Minority Member, Committee on Finance\nChairman and Ranking Minority Member, Subcommittee on Social Security and Family\nPolicy\nChairman and Ranking Minority Member, Senate Special Committee on Aging\nSocial Security Advisory Board\n\x0c Overview of the Office of the Inspector General\nThe Office of the Inspector General (OIG) is comprised of our Office of Investigations (OI),\nOffice of Audit (OA), Office of the Chief Counsel to the Inspector General (OCCIG), and Office\nof Resource Management (ORM). To ensure compliance with policies and procedures, internal\ncontrols, and professional standards, we also have a comprehensive Professional Responsibility\nand Quality Assurance program.\n Office of Audit\nOA conducts and/or supervises financial and performance audits of the Social Security\nAdministration\xe2\x80\x99s (SSA) programs and operations and makes recommendations to ensure\nprogram objectives are achieved effectively and efficiently. Financial audits assess whether\nSSA\xe2\x80\x99s financial statements fairly present SSA\xe2\x80\x99s financial position, results of operations, and cash\nflow. Performance audits review the economy, efficiency, and effectiveness of SSA\xe2\x80\x99s programs\nand operations. OA also conducts short-term management and program evaluations and projects\non issues of concern to SSA, Congress, and the general public.\n\n\n Office of Investigations\nOI conducts and coordinates investigative activity related to fraud, waste, abuse, and\nmismanagement in SSA programs and operations. This includes wrongdoing by applicants,\nbeneficiaries, contractors, third parties, or SSA employees performing their official duties. This\noffice serves as OIG liaison to the Department of Justice on all matters relating to the\ninvestigations of SSA programs and personnel. OI also conducts joint investigations with other\nFederal, State, and local law enforcement agencies.\n\n\n Office of the Chief Counsel to the Inspector General\nOCCIG provides independent legal advice and counsel to the IG on various matters, including\nstatutes, regulations, legislation, and policy directives. OCCIG also advises the IG on\ninvestigative procedures and techniques, as well as on legal implications and conclusions to be\ndrawn from audit and investigative material. Finally, OCCIG administers the Civil Monetary\nPenalty program.\n Office of Resource Management\nORM supports OIG by providing information resource management and systems security. ORM\nalso coordinates OIG\xe2\x80\x99s budget, procurement, telecommunications, facilities, and human\nresources. In addition, ORM is the focal point for OIG\xe2\x80\x99s strategic planning function and the\ndevelopment and implementation of performance measures required by the Government\nPerformance and Results Act of 1993.\n\x0c'


type: wikipedia

text:
Brigitte Anne-Marie Bardot () este o actriță de cinematograf, fostă sex simbol al anilor '60.
 Născută și crescută în Paris, Bardot aspira să fie balerină. Cariera o îndreaptă spre actorie în 1952. A atins nivelul de star internațional în 1957 odată cu rolul controversat din Și Dumnezeu...a creat femeia (1956). Stârnește interesul intelectualilor francezi, fiind chiar subiectul eseului din 1959, Sindromul Lolita, de Simone de Beauvoir. Bardot este văzută ca un model și declarată prima femeie liberă din Franța de după război. Lucrează cu regizori precum Jean-Luc Godard și Louis Malle.
 Se retrage din industria filmului în 1973. Jucase până în acel moment în 47 de filme și înregistrase peste 60 de cântece. I-a fost oferită medalia Legiunea de Onoare în 1985, dar a refuzat să o primească. După retragere devine activistă pentru drepturile animalelor. În anii 2000 generează controverse pentru afirmațiile rasiste împotriva imigranților arabi din Franța. A fost amendată de cinci ori pentru incitarea urii rasiale.
 Biografie
 Biografie timpurie
 Brigitte Anne-Marie Bardot s-a născut în 28 septembrie 1934 în Paris. Este fiica lui Louis Bardot și Anne-Marie Mucel. Tatăl său, originar din Ligny-en-Barrois, era un inginer și proprietarul a mai multe fabrici industriale din Paris. Bardot a crescut într-o familie catolică conservatoare.
 Brigitte Bardot, în memoriile sale Initiales B.B., scrie despre ea însăși, "În copilărie am fost timidă și urâtă. Aveam părul rar, ochelari și purtam aparat de îndreptat dinții" . Transformarea sa într-o superbă femeie și inițierea unei cariere de o deosebită strălucire s-au produs treptat. A lucrat mai întâi ca manechin pentru marile case de modă pariziene. La vârsta de 15 ani apare pentru prima dată pe coperta revistei Elle și începe să facă cinematografie la 17 ani.
 Filme
 Debutul este în Le trou normand de Jean Boyer în 1952, anul în care se căsătorește cu Roger Vadim. La început - spune ea - nimeni nu se interesa de ea. Până în 1956, când triumfă în filmul cu titlu premonitoriu Și Dumnezeu a creat femeia (Et Dieu créa la femme), în regia soțului său, Roger Vadim. El este cel care a lansat o nouă imagine a feminității, eliberată de complexe, directă, inocentă și provocatoare totodată.
 Cu următoarele filme En cas de malheur („În caz de nenorocire”) și Babette pleacă la război (Babette s'en va-t-en guerre) devine în Franța mai populară decât Michelle Morgan și în Statele Unite mai iubită decât Marilyn Monroe. Turneazǎ apoi filmul La vérité ("Adevărul"), cu Henri Clouzot, dar succesul îi este umbrit de dezvăluirea amănuntelor vieții ei intime după despărțirea de Roger Vadim, dezvăluiri făcute publice de secretara sa și publicate în revista France Dimanche. Face o tentativă de sinucidere, dar este salvată și - deși voia să abandoneze cariera cinematografică - acceptă propunerea regizorului Louis Malle să interpreteze rolul principal în filmul Vie privée ("Viață particulară"), care i se potrivește acum perfect.
 „Femeie fatală”
 Devine cea mai fotografiată femeie din lume, cu o notorietate pe care uneori o resimțea ca un infern, urmărită continuu de admiratori și de paparazzi. În mijlocul acestui haos reușește să facă poate cel mai bun film al ei, Le mépris ("Disprețul"), în regia lui Jean Luc Godard. În 1966 se căsătorește cu bogatul om de afaceri german Gunter Sachs, petrece o aventuroasă lună de miere în insulele Tahiti, dar nici această căsnicie (a treia!) nu durează mult. Peliculele de la începutul anilor '70, L'Ours et la poupée ("Ursul și Păpușa"), Les novices ("Novicele") sunt mai puțin convingătoare.
 Trăind retrasă și singură
 În 1973, după filmul Don Juan 73, realizat cu regizorul de la începutul carierei sale Roger Vadim, își anunță retragerea definitivă din viața cinematografică. Avea 38 de ani și punea punct unei cariere și poate unei epoci. Brigitte Bardot, căsătorită cu Bernard d'Ormale, este acum o doamnă de o anumită vârstă, ducând o viață retrasă, aproape lipsită de cochetărie, dedicându-se acțiunilor de protecție a animalelor. A intervenit și pentru protejarea câinilor vagabonzi din București.
 Brigitte Bardot a inspirat hitul lui Serge Gainsbourg, Je T’aime... Moi Non Plus.
 Filmografie selectivă
 1956 Și Dumnezeu a creat femeia (Et Dieu...créa la femme), regia Roger Vadim
 1957 Une Parisienne
 1958 Îndrăgostiți sub clar de lună
 1959 Babette pleacă la război (Babette s'en va-t-en guerre), regia Christian-Jaque
 1959 En cas de malheur
 1959 Voulez-vous danser avec moi?
 1959 La femme et le pantin
 1960 La Vérité
 1962 Viața particulară (Vie privée), regia Louis Malle
 1963 Les Mépris
 1965 Viva Maria!, regia Louis Malle
 1966 Masculin féminin
 1966 Marie Soleil
 1968 Shalako
 1969 Ursul și păpușa (L'ours et la poupée), regia Michel Deville
 1971 Bulevardul romului (Boulevard du rhum), regia Robert Enrico
 1973 Don Juan 73
 1975 Un surâs, o palmă, un sărut (Un sorriso, uno schiaffo, un bacio in bocca), regia Mario Morra
 Vezi și
 Listă de modele playboy
 Note
 Legături externe
 Nașteri în 1934
 Nașteri pe 28 septembrie
 Actori din Paris
 Actrițe franceze ale secolului al XX-lea
 Actrițe franceze ale secolului al XXI-lea
 Actrițe de film franceze
 Activiști francezi
 Cântăreți în limba franceză
 Cântărețe franceze
 Câștigătorii premiilor David di Donatello
 Francezi în viață
 Fotomodele din Franța
 Modele Playboy
 Muzicieni ai MGM Records
 Personalități care au refuzat Légion d'honneur
 Romano-catolici francezi
 Supraviețuitori ai bolilor canceroase


text:
Gun Bow (1960 – December 1979) was an American Thoroughbred racehorse. He was one of America's leading older male racehorses in 1964 and 1965 and was later inducted into the Hall of Fame. Gun Bow was noted for his rivalry with five-time American Horse of the Year Kelso.
 Background
 Owned and bred by cosmetics tycoon Elizabeth Arden at her Maine Chance Farm, Gun Bow was sired by Gun Shot, a son of Hyperion, the 1933 Epsom Derby winner and a six-time leading sire in Great Britain & Ireland. He was out of the mare Ribbons and Bows, a daughter of 1937 U.S. Triple Crown champion War Admiral.
 Lameness kept Gun Bow out of racing at age two and as a result of American tax laws at the time, Arden sold Gun Bow in December 1962 to Harry Albert and Mrs. John Stanley of New Jersey, who raced him under the name Gedney Farms. He was conditioned by future Hall of Fame trainer Edward A. Neloy.
 Racing career
 As a three-year-old in 1963, Gun Bow won six of his eighteen starts. His most significant 1963 win came in the Narragansett Special at Narragansett Park in Pawtucket, Rhode Island. However, by age four he had developed into a powerful runner and a major rival for Kelso.
 In his 1964 season, Gun Bow traveled across the United States. He raced in California as well as at Arlington Park in the Midwest, plus at tracks on the East Coast, from New York thorough Florida. He won eight of his sixteen starts, including three important graded stakes races on the West Coast, and had wins in major East Coast races such as the Woodward Stakes. He defeated Kelso by twelve lengths in the Brooklyn Handicap while setting a new track record for 10 furlongs. He gave the U.S. a one-two finish against an international field when he came in second to Kelso in record time in the Washington, D.C. International. In September, his owners syndicated 60% of Gun Bow to a group led by John R. Gaines, which included former owner, Elizabeth Arden. For the 1964 racing year, Gun Bow had earnings of more than $580,000.
 Racing at age five, Gun Bow won three of eight starts, claiming his second straight San Antonio Handicap in California plus the Metropolitan and Donn Handicaps in the East.
 Stud career
 Gun Bow retired to stud duty after his 1965 racing season, but his offspring met with modest racing success. Notably, his outstanding daughter Pistol Packer won several Group One races in France, including the 1971 Prix de Diane. In 1974, Gun Bow was sold to a breeding farm in Japan where he died in December 1979.
 In 1999, Gun Bow was inducted into the United States' National Museum of Racing and Hall of Fame.
 References
 Bowen, Edward L. At the Wire: Horse Racing's Greatest Moments (2001) Eclipse Press
 1960 racehorse births
 1979 racehorse deaths
 Racehorses bred in Kentucky
 Racehorses trained in the United States
 United States Thoroughbred Racing Hall of Fame inductees
 Thoroughbred family 1-k


type: contracts

text:
 27.11.2014
 HU
 Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja
 L 342/42
 AZ EGT VEGYES BIZOTTSÁG 135/2014 HATÁROZATA
 (2014. június 27.)
 az Európai Gazdasági Térségről szóló megállapodás XIII. mellékletének (Közlekedés) módosításáról
 AZ EGT VEGYES BIZOTTSÁG,
 tekintettel az Európai Gazdasági Térségről szóló megállapodásra (a továbbiakban: az EGT-megállapodás) és különösen annak 98. cikkére,
 mivel:
 (1)
 A légiforgalmi szolgáltatási (ATM) hálózati funkciók végrehajtására vonatkozó részletes szabályok megállapításáról és a 691/2010/EU rendelet módosításáról szóló, 2011. július 7-i 677/2011/EU bizottsági rendeletet (1) bele kell foglalni az EGT-megállapodásba.
 (2)
 Az EGT-megállapodás XIII. mellékletét ennek megfelelően módosítani kell,
 ELFOGADTA EZT A HATÁROZATOT:
 1. cikk
 Az EGT-megállapodás XIII. melléklete a következőképpen módosul:
 1.
 A szöveg a 66wm. pont (391/2013/EU bizottsági végrehajtási rendelet) után a következő szöveggel egészül ki:
 „66wn.
 32011 R 0677: a Bizottság 2011. július 7-i 677/2011/EU rendelete a légiforgalmi szolgáltatási (ATM) hálózati funkciók végrehajtására vonatkozó részletes szabályok megállapításáról és a 691/2010/EU rendelet módosításáról (HL L 185., 2011.7.15., 1. o.).
 A rendelet rendelkezései e megállapodás alkalmazásában a következő kiigazításokkal értendők:
 a)
 A »hálózatkezelő« kifejezés arra a hálózatkezelőre utal, amelyet az uniós tagállamok és az EGT-tag EFTA-államok számára neveztek ki.
 b)
 A megállapodás 1. jegyzőkönyvének rendelkezéseitől eltérve, a »tagállam(ok)« kifejezés, a rendeletbeli értelmezésen túlmenően, az EFTA-államokat is magában foglalja.
 c)
 A 3. cikk (3) bekezdésében, az EFTA-államok vonatkozásában a »bizottsági határozat formájában történik, az 549/2004/EK rendelet 5. cikkének (3) bekezdése szerint az egységes égbolttal foglalkozó bizottsággal folytatott konzultációt követően, és« szövegrész »az EFTA-államok Állandó Bizottságának határozata«-ként, a »Bizottság« szó pedig »az EFTA-államok Állandó Bizottsága«-ként értelmezendő.
 d)
 A 4. cikk (4) bekezdésében a »Bizottság« szót követően »az EFTA-államok Állandó Bizottsága, az EFTA Felügyeleti Hatóság« szövegrészt kell beilleszteni.
 e)
 A 7. cikk (5) bekezdésében a »Bizottság« szót követően »az EFTA-államok Állandó Bizottsága, az EFTA Felügyeleti Hatóság« szövegrészt kell beilleszteni.
 f)
 A 16. cikk (3) bekezdésének b) pontjában a »Bizottság« szót követően az »és az EFTA Felügyeleti Hatóság egy képviselője« szövegrészt kell beilleszteni.
 g)
 A 17. cikk (2) bekezdésének a) pontja nem alkalmazandó az EFTA-államokra.
 h)
 A 18. cikk (2) bekezdésében a »Tanács« szót követően »az EFTA-államok Állandó Bizottságának elnökségét betöltő EFTA-állam egy képviselője« szövegrészt kell beilleszteni.
 i)
 A 20. cikk (3) bekezdésének első mondatában a »Bizottság« szót követően »az EFTA-államok Állandó Bizottsága, az EFTA Felügyeleti Hatóság« szavakat kell beilleszteni.
 j)
 A 21. cikk első mondatában a »Bizottság« szó az EFTA-államok vonatkozásában az »EFTA Felügyeleti Hatóság«-ként értelmezendő.”
 2.
 A 66xa. pont (691/2010/EK bizottsági rendelet) a következő francia bekezdéssel egészül ki:
 „—
 32011 R 0677: a Bizottság 2011. július 7-i 677/2011/EU rendelete (HL L 185., 2011.7.15., 1. o.)”
 .
 2. cikk
 A 677/2011/EU rendeletnek az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja EGT-kiegészítésében közzéteendő izlandi és norvég nyelvű szövege hiteles.
 3. cikk
 Ez a határozat 2014. június 28-án lép hatályba, feltéve hogy az EGT-megállapodás 103. cikkének (1) bekezdésében előírt összes bejelentést megtették (2), vagy a 2013. december 13-i 229/2013 EGT vegyes bizottsági határozat (3) hatálybalépésének napján, attól függően, hogy melyik a későbbi időpont.
 4. cikk
 Ezt a határozatot az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapjának EGT-re vonatkozó részében és EGT-kiegészítésében ki kell hirdetni.
 Kelt Brüsszelben, 2014. június 27-én.
 az EGT Vegyes Bizottság részéről
 az elnök
 Gianluca GRIPPA
 (1) HL L 185., 2011.7.15., 1. o.
 (2) Alkotmányos követelmények fennállását jelezték.
 (3) HL L 154., 2014.5.22., 28. o.


text:
Občina Puconci je ena od občin v severovzhodni Republiki Sloveniji. Osrednje naselje so istoimenski Puconci.
 Naselja v občini
 Beznovci, Bodonci, Bokrači, Brezovci, Dankovci, Dolina, Gorica, Kuštanovci, Lemerje, Mačkovci, Moščanci, Otovci, Pečarovci, Poznanovci, Predanovci, Prosečka vas, Puconci, Puževci, Strukovci, Šalamenci, Vadarci, Vaneča, Zenkovci
 Zastava in grb občine Puconci
 Oba simbola predstavljata slogan, da Občina Puconci leži tam, kjer si Ravensko in Goričko podajata roki.
 Prav tako pa je simbol občine Puconci tudi kitica iz narodne pesmi v prekmurščini.
 .
 Grb občine Puconci
 Sestavljen je iz štirih barv:
 Nebo, kjer je žitni klas je zlato rumeno - predstavlja bogastvo rodovitnih polj.
 Oranžne barve sta sonce in žitni klas - simbolizira toplino pokrajine.
 Zelene barve so griči.
 Rdeče barve je jabolko, ki je tudi simbol prijateljstva, poudarja pa tudi močno razvito sadjarstvo, ki ima stoletno tradicijo.
 Zastava občine Puconci
 Zastava je obešena vedno navpično, gledano od spredaj mora biti na levi strani rumena, na desni pa zelena barva. Vsaka barva zavzema polovico zastave. Vertikalna zastava ima razmerje širine proti višini 1 : 2. Na zgornji polovici zastave je grb.
 Občinska simbola sta pričela veljati 16. februarja 1998.
 Praznik občine Puconci
 Svoj praznik ima občina 13. oktobra. Tega dne leta 1781 je bil objavljen tolerančni patent, ki je osnova za enakopravno delovanje vseh cerkvenih skupnosti. V občini živijo namreč v sožitju in strpnosti prebivalci evangeličanske, katoliške in binkoštne veroizpovedi.
 Sklici in opombe
 Zunanje povezave
 Puconci, uradna stran občine.
 Puconci


text:
Cleaver is a metafictional film within a TV series that serves as a plot element toward the end of the HBO television drama series The Sopranos. Although very little film material is actually shown in the series, its planning and development are discussed at large throughout multiple seasons of the show. The extent to which character Christopher Moltisanti mixes confidential and personal information about the Soprano mob family into the story elements of Cleaver is the focal point throughout its development.
 Cleaver —originally titled Pork Store Killer— can be categorized as a direct-to-DVD mafia-slasher film, described alternately as "Saw meets the Godfather II", "the Ring meets The Godfather", and "a story about a young man who goes to pieces and then manages to pull himself together again". Several characters are credited for their involvement in the project. The screenplay was written by J. T. Dolan based on a story by Christopher Moltisanti. The film was directed by Morgan Yam, and produced by Carmine Lupertazzi, Jr. and Moltisanti.
 The film starred Jonathan LaPaglia as Michael "the Cleaver" and Daniel Baldwin as mob boss Salvatore ("Sally Boy"). Sally Boy's key advisors are played by George Pogatsia (Frankie) and Lenny Ligotti (Nicky). Initially, Moltisanti and Lupertazzi attempted to cast Ben Kingsley as the mafia boss in the episode "Luxury Lounge", but Kingsley turned the part down.
 Plot
 The protagonist of Cleaver is Michael, a character nicknamed "the Butcher". When Christopher Moltisanti proposes the plot to writer J. T. Dolan, he says the film is about a "young wise guy, assassin, gets betrayed by his people. They whack him and leave his body parts in dumpsters all around the city. Long story short, he is put back together, by science...or maybe it's supernatural. And he gets payback on everyone who fucked him over, including the cunt who he was engaged to. She was getting porked by his boss the night the hero was killed."
 Several episodes in the film are drawn from Moltisanti's own life experiences as a made man in the Soprano crime family, including a misinterpreted and overblown rumor concerning an alleged affair between Family head Anthony Soprano and Christopher's then-fiancée Adriana La Cerva. The film closes on a tight shot of a crucifix and a cornicello, juxtaposing "the sacred and the profane".
 Development
 Moltisanti met Dolan while both were in rehab recovering from heroin addiction. In the episode "In Camelot" (5x07), their friendship gets complicated when Christopher introduced J. T. to the underground world of high-stakes poker games, inadvertently giving the writer a new outlet for his addictive personality. Dolan rapidly found himself $60,000 in debt, and soon wound up back in rehab at Moltisanti's prompting.
 The film itself originated in "Mayham" (6x03) when Moltisanti offered Dolan a way to clear his debts: to write a screenplay for a digital slasher film based on a concept by Christopher. But the story had its genesis earlier, when Christopher began his quest to write a screenplay in "The Legend of Tennessee Moltisanti" (1x08). After struggling through 19 pages, Moltisanti became disillusioned and slipped into a depression, throwing away his work.
 He later had an affair with studio vice-president Amy Safir in "D-Girl" (2x07). Through her, he met Swingers and Made scribe Jon Favreau, with whom he discussed his film concept. When they decide that the title of the movie is to be Cleaver, Christopher mentions to Tony that the estate of Black Panther Party leader Eldridge Cleaver has filed a motion to put a hold on production because of the name association. This is never brought up again in the series and the title does not change.
 In "Kaisha" (6x12), Moltisanti discussed the similarities between Sally Boy and Anthony Soprano with Julianna Skiff, describing both as men who think that everything belongs to them — a notion crystallized by Sally Boy in Cleaver'''s finale when he tells Michael: "What you have belongs to me" because "what's mine is mine; what's yours is mine."
 Episodes
 "The Legend of Tennessee Moltisanti" (1x08)
 "D-Girl" (2x07)
 "In Camelot" (5x07)
 "Mayham" (6x03)
 "Luxury Lounge" (6x07)
 "Kaisha" (6x12)
 "Stage 5" (6x14)
 Mockumentary
 In conjunction with the premiere of "Stage 5," HBO aired the seven-minute mockumentary Making Cleaver'', detailing the film's production. Including in-character interviews with Moltisanti, Lupertazzi, Yam, Baldwin, LaPaglia, and special-effects make-up artist Steve Kelly, the behind-the-scenes look is broken up into four segments: "Concept," "Courting Kingsley," "Cast and Crew," and "A 'Family' Production." The mockumentary is included in the Season 6 Part 2 DVD set and in The Complete Series DVD collection.
 References
 External links
 Fictional films
 The Sopranos


type: caselaw

text:
 4.4.2022
 GA
 Iris Oifigiúil an Aontais Eorpaigh
 C 148/38
 Caingean arna tabhairt an 21 Feabhra 2022 – Ilunga Luyoyo v an Chomhairle
 (Cás T-97/22)
 (2022/C 148/61)
 Teanga an cháis: an Fhraincis
 Páirtithe
 Iarratasóir: Ferdinand Ilunga Luyoyo (Kinshasa, Poblacht Dhaonlathach an Chongó) (ionadaithe: T. Bontinck, P. De Wolf, A. Guillerme agus T. Payan, dlíodóirí)
 Cosantóir: Comhairle an Aontais Eorpaigh
 An t-ordú atá á lorg
 Iarrann an t-iarratasóir ar an gCúirt Ghinearálta:
 —
 Cinneadh (CBES) 2021/2181 ón gComhairle an 9 Nollaig 2021 a neamhniú (1), a mhéid a choimeádtar leis an t-iarratasóir faoi Uimh. 3 den iarscríbhinn a ghabhann leis an gCinneadh sin;
 —
 Rialachán Cur Chun Feidhme (AE) 2021/2177 ón gComhairle an 9 Nollaig 2021 (2) a neamhniú, a mhéid a choimeádtar leis an t-iarratasóir faoi Uimh. 3 d’Iarscríbhinn I a ghabhann leis an Rialachán sin;
 —
 a ordú don Chomhairle na costais a íoc.
 Saincheisteanna dlí agus príomhargóintí
 Mar thaca leis an gcaingean, ardaíonn an t-iarratasóir dhá shaincheist dlí atá, go bunúsach, comhionann nó cosúil leis na cinn a ardaítear i gCás T-90/22, Kande Mupompa v an Chomhairle.
 (1) Cinneadh (CBES) 2021/2181 ón gComhairle an 9 Nollaig 2021, lena leasaítear Cinneadh 2010/788/CBES a bhaineann le bearta sriantacha i gcoinne Phoblacht Dhaonlathach an Chongó (IO 2021 L 443, lch. 75).
 (2) Rialachán Cur Chun Feidhme (AE) 2021/2177 ón gComhairle an 9 Nollaig 2021, lena gcuirtear chun feidhme Airteagal 9 de Rialachán (CE) Uimh. 1183/2005 lena bhforchuirtear bearta sriantacha sonracha áirithe a dhírítear i gcoinne daoine atá ag gníomhú de shárú ar an lánchosc arm i dtaca le Poblacht Dhaonlathach an Chongó (IO 2021 L 443, lch. 3).


text:
 30.1.2020
 SK
 Úradný vestník Európskej únie
 L 26/73
 ROZHODNUTIE SPOLOČNÉHO VÝBORU EHP
 č. 74/2018
 z 23. marca 2018,
 ktorým sa mení príloha XX (Životné prostredie) k Dohode o EHP [2020/91]
 SPOLOČNÝ VÝBOR EHP,
 so zreteľom na Dohodu o Európskom hospodárskom priestore (ďalej len „Dohoda o EHP“), a najmä na jej článok 98,
 keďže:
 (1)
 Vykonávacie nariadenie Komisie (EÚ) 2016/1928 zo 4. novembra 2016 o určení prepravovaného nákladu pre iné kategórie lodí, ako sú osobné lode, lode ro-ro a kontajnerové lode podľa nariadenia Európskeho parlamentu a Rady (EÚ) 2015/757 o monitorovaní, nahlasovaní a overovaní emisií oxidu uhličitého z námornej dopravy (1) sa má začleniť do Dohody o EHP.
 (2)
 Príloha XX k Dohode o EHP by sa preto mala zodpovedajúcim spôsobom zmeniť,
 PRIJAL TOTO ROZHODNUTIE:
 Článok 1
 V prílohe XX k Dohode o EHP sa za bod 21awb [vykonávacie nariadenie Komisie (EÚ) 2016/1927] vkladá tento bod:
 „21awc.
 32016 R 1928: vykonávacie nariadenie Komisie (EÚ) 2016/1928 zo 4. novembra 2016 o určení prepravovaného nákladu pre iné kategórie lodí, ako sú osobné lode, lode ro-ro a kontajnerové lode podľa nariadenia Európskeho parlamentu a Rady (EÚ) 2015/757 o monitorovaní, nahlasovaní a overovaní emisií oxidu uhličitého z námornej dopravy (Ú. v. EÚ L 299, 5.11.2016, s. 22).“
 Článok 2
 Znenie vykonávacieho nariadenia (EÚ) 2016/1928 v islandskom a nórskom jazyku, ktoré sa uverejní v dodatku EHP k Úradnému vestníku Európskej únie, je autentické.
 Článok 3
 Toto rozhodnutie nadobúda účinnosť 24. marca 2018 pod podmienkou, že boli doručené všetky oznámenia podľa článku 103 ods. 1 Dohody o EHP (*1).
 Článok 4
 Toto rozhodnutie sa uverejní v oddiele EHP Úradného vestníka Európskej únie a v dodatku EHP k Úradnému vestníku Európskej únie.
 V Bruseli 23. marca 2018
 Za Spoločný výbor EHP
 predseda
 Claude MAERTEN
 (1) Ú. v. EÚ L 299, 5.11.2016, s. 22.
 (*1) Ústavné požiadavky neboli oznámené.