text:
 Avis juridique important
 |
 22000A1209(01)
 Euroopan yhteisön ja entisen Jugoslavian tasavallan Makedonian välinen kirjeenvaihto yhteistyösopimuksen kauppaa ja kaupan liitännäistoimenpiteitä koskevia määräyksiä sisältävän II osaston soveltamisen keskeyttämisestä
 Virallinen lehti nro L 309 , 09/12/2000 s. 0030 - 0032
 Euroopan yhteisön ja entisen Jugoslavian tasavallan Makedonian välinenkirjeenvaihtoyhteistyösopimuksen kauppaa ja kaupan liitännäistoimenpiteitä koskevia määräyksiä sisältävän II osaston soveltamisen keskeyttämisestäA. Yhteisön kirjeBryssel, 20. marraskuuta 2000Arvoisa Herra,Ottaen huomioon parannetut yksipuoliset tullietuudet, joista säädetään poikkeuksellisten kaupan toimenpiteiden käyttöönotosta Euroopan unionin vakautus- ja assosiaatioprosessiin osallistuville tai siihen yhteydessä oleville maille ja alueille sekä asetuksen (EY) N:o 2820/98 muuttamisesta ja asetusten (EY) N:o 1763/1999 ja (EY) N:o 6/2000 kumoamisesta 18 päivänä syyskuuta 2000 annetussa neuvoston asetuksessa (EY) N:o 2007/2000, Euroopan yhteisö ja entinen Jugoslavian tasavalta Makedonia ovat sopineet Euroopan yhteisön ja entisen Jugoslavian tasavallan Makedonian 29 päivänä huhtikuuta 1997 kirjeenvaihtona allekirjoitetun yhteistyösopimuksen kauppaa ja kaupan liitännäistoimenpiteitä koskevia määräyksiä sisältävän II osaston, asianomaiset liitteet mukaan luettuina, soveltamisen keskeyttämisestä.Näin ollen 18 päivänä syyskuuta 2000 annetulla neuvoston asetuksella (EY) N:o 2007/2000, sellaisena kuin se on muutettuna asetuksella (EY) N:o 2563/2000, säännellään sen soveltamispäivästä Euroopan yhteisön ja entisen Jugoslavian tasavallan Makedonian välistä kauppajärjestelmää, ja samana päivänä lakataan soveltamasta entiseen Jugoslavian tasavaltaan Makedoniaan Euroopan yhteisön ja entisen Jugoslavian tasavallan Makedonian yhteistyösopimuksen kauppaa ja kaupan liitännäistoimenpiteitä koskevia määräyksiä sisältävää II osastoa, asianomaiset liitteet mukaan luettuina.Yhteistyösopimuksen II osastoa ja kaikkia kauppaa koskevia määräyksiä koskeva soveltamisen keskeyttäminen päättyy, mikäli asetusta (EY) N:o 2007/2000 lakataan soveltamasta entiseen Jugoslavian tasavaltaan Makedoniaan.Olisin kiitollinen, jos voisitte vahvistaa hallituksenne olevan yhtä mieltä edellä olevasta.Vastaanottakaa, Arvoisa Herra, korkeimman kunnioitukseni vakuutus.Euroopan unionin neuvoston puolesta>PIC FILE= "L_2000309FI.003002.EPS">B. Entisen Jugoslavian tasavallan Makedonian kirjeSkopje, 22. marraskuuta 2000Arvoisa Herra,Minulla on kunnia ilmoittaa, että oheen liitetty kirjeenne, joka koskee Euroopan yhteisön ja entisen Jugoslavian tasavallan Makedonian 29 päivänä huhtikuuta 1997 kirjeenvaihtona allekirjoitetun yhteistyösopimuksen kauppaa ja kaupan liitännäistoimenpiteitä koskevia määräyksiä sisältävän II osaston, asianomaiset liitteet mukaan luettuina, soveltamisen keskeyttämistä, on vastaanotettu.Makedonian tasavallalla on kunnia vahvistaa hyväksyvänsä tämän kirjeen sisällön.Kirjeenvaihto olisi katsottava hyväksynnän vahvistukseksi.Ilmoitan kuitenkin, että Makedonian tasavalta ei hyväksy maastamme edellä mainituissa asiakirjoissa käytettyä nimeä, koska maamme perustuslaissa käytetty nimi on Makedonian tasavalta.Makedonian tasavallan hallituksen puolesta>PIC FILE= "L_2000309FI.003101.EPS">C. Euroopan yhteisön kirjeBryssel, 5. joulukuuta 2000Arvoisa Herra,Minulla on kunnia ilmoittaa vastaanottaneeni 22 päivänä marraskuuta 2000 päivätyn kirjeenne.Euroopan yhteisö panee merkille, että Euroopan unionin neuvoston puheenjohtajan ja maanne hallituksen pääministerin välinen kirjeenvaihto, jolla keskeytetään Euroopan yhteisön ja entisen Jugoslavian tasavallan Makedonian 29 päivänä huhtikuuta 1997 kirjeenvaihtona allekirjoitetun yhteistyösopimuksen kauppaa ja kaupan liitännäistoimenpiteitä koskevia määräyksiä sisältävän II osaston, asianomaiset liitteet mukaan luettuina, soveltaminen, on saatettu päätökseen.Tätä ei voida tulkita siten, että Euroopan unioni hyväksyisi tai tunnustaisi muuta nimeä, oli se muodoltaan tai sisällöltään millainen tahansa, kuin "entinen Jugoslavian tasavalta Makedonia".Vastaanottakaa, Arvoisa Herra, korkeimman kunnioitukseni vakuutus.Euroopan unionin neuvoston puolesta>PIC FILE= "L_2000309FI.003201.EPS">


type: other

text:
Τιμητική αναμνηστική πλακέτα από τον Πολιτιστικό Σύλλογο Αγίας Αικατερίνης στον Νίκο Ηγουμενίδη (28.9.2018) – Νίκος Ηγουμενίδης
 Τιμητική αναμνηστική πλακέτα από τον Πολιτιστικό Σύλλογο Αγίας Αικατερίνης στον Νίκο Ηγουμενίδη (28.9.2018)
 Την εκφρασμένη και έμπρακτη θέληση της Κυβέρνησης να αξιοποιήσει την περιουσία που υπάρχει στην ευθύνη της για το καλό των τοπικών κοινωνιών, υπογράμμισε ο βουλευτής ΣΥΡΙΖΑ του Ν. Ηρακλείου Νίκος Ηγουμενίδης
 Τιμητική αναμνηστική πλακέτα από τον Πολιτιστικό Σύλλογο Αγίας Αικατερίνης απονεμήθηκε σήμερα και στην διοικήτρια του ΟΑΕΔ Μαρία Καραμεσίνη και στον βουλευτή Ηρακλείου Νίκο Ηγουμενίδη για την προσφορά τους στο έργο του Συλλόγου.
 Από την έδρα του Πολιτιστικού Συλλόγου στην Αγία Αικατερίνη, ο Νίκος Ηγουμενίδης ευχαρίστησε θερμά και συνεχάρη τον Σύλλογο για την δραστηριότητα του που έχει «πραγματικό θετικό αντίκτυπο στην περιοχή της Αγίας Αικατερίνης». Κατά την σύντομη τοποθέτηση του, ο Νίκος Ηγουμενίδης τόνισε ότι όλο το τελευταίο διάστημα μια σειρά από κομβικά κτίρια «ξεμπλοκάρουν» από πολύχρονες γραφειοκρατικές διαδικασίες με αποτέλεσμα την παραχώρηση από τον ΟΑΕΔ και το Υπουργείο Εργασίας ακινήτων με αποκλειστικό στόχο την ανέγερση κοινωνικών δομών προς όφελος των τοπικών κοινωνιών.
 «Είναι εκφρασμένη και έμπρακτη η θέληση της Κυβέρνησης να αξιοποιήσει την περιουσία που υπάρχει στην ευθύνη της για το καλό των τοπικών κοινωνιών. Αυτό είναι το πρώτο που θα ήθελα να σημειώσω. Το δεύτερο είναι ότι αυτή η θέληση ‘παντρεύεται’ με τον σχεδιασμό που έχετε», σημείωσε χαρακτηριστικά ο Νίκος Ηγουμενίδης, απευθυνόμενος στο ΔΣ του Πολιτιστικού Συλλόγου και στον Πρόεδρο του Μηνά Μαυροειδή.
 Ο βουλευτής εξέφρασε επίσης την ικανοποίηση του για την παραχώρηση του οικοπέδου του ΟΑΕΔ στον Δήμο Ηρακλείου με σκοπό την ανέγερση Αθλητικού και Πολιτιστικού Κέντρου στην Αγία Αικατερίνη, αλλά και για την καταρχήν συμφωνία ανάμεσα στον ΟΑΕΔ και στον Δήμο για την επιπλέον παραχώρηση οικοπεδικής έκτασης ιδιοκτησίας ΟΑΕΔ στην Αγία Αικατερίνη προκειμένου να δημιουργηθούν κοινωνικές δομές στην περιοχή, ικανοποιώντας ένα σημαντικό αίτημα του Πολιτιστικού Συλλόγου που «πατά» στις ανάγκες της τοπικής κοινωνίας.
 Υπενθύμισε, επίσης, και την τελευταία θετική έγκρισή από τον Υφυπουργό Εργασίας Αναστάσιο Πετρόπουλο για το αίτημα της παραχώρησης, τόσο του κτιρίου που ανήκει στο ΙΚΑ του Αγίου Μηνά όσο και του κτιρίου που ανήκει στο ΙΚΑ Χερσονήσου, ώστε να αξιοποιηθούν ως μονάδες υγείας.
 Σημειώνεται ότι κατά την σημερινή παρουσία της διοικήτριας του ΟΑΕΔ Μαρίας Καραμεσίνη υπεγράφη στη Λότζια το παραχωρητήριο – χρησιδάνειο οικοπέδου 5.200 τετραγωνικών μέτρων, από τον ΟΑΕΔ προς τον Δήμο Ηρακλείου για το αθλητικό κέντρο, ενώ ακολούθησε επίσκεψη της διοικήτριας στα εν λόγω οικόπεδα, παρουσία, μεταξύ άλλων, και του Δημάρχου Ηρακλείου Βασίλη Λαμπρινού, της διοικήτριας της 7ης ΥΠΕ Ελένης Μαυρομμάτη και του προέδρου του Πολιτιστικού Συλλόγου Αγίας Αικατερίνης Μηνά Μαυροειδή.
 Ηράκλειο, 28.9.2018
 Tags: ΟΑΕΔ, Πολιτιστικός Σύλλογος Αγίας Αικατερίνης


type: legislation

jurisdiction: EU

text:
 28.7.2011
 NL
 Publicatieblad van de Europese Unie
 L 196/13
 UITVOERINGSVERORDENING (EU) Nr. 742/2011 VAN DE COMMISSIE
 van 27 juli 2011
 inzake de afgifte van invoercertificaten voor rijst in het kader van de bij Verordening (EG) nr. 327/98 geopende tariefcontingenten voor de deelperiode juli 2011
 DE EUROPESE COMMISSIE,
 Gezien het Verdrag betreffende de werking van de Europese Unie,
 Gezien Verordening (EG) nr. 1234/2007 van de Raad van 22 oktober 2007 houdende een gemeenschappelijke ordening van de landbouwmarkten en specifieke bepalingen voor een aantal landbouwproducten („integrale-GMO-verordening”) (1),
 Gezien Verordening (EG) nr. 1301/2006 van de Commissie van 31 augustus 2006 houdende gemeenschappelijke voorschriften voor het beheer van door middel van een stelsel van invoercertificaten beheerde invoertariefcontingenten voor landbouwproducten (2), en met name op artikel 7, lid 2,
 Gezien Verordening (EG) nr. 327/98 van de Commissie van 10 februari 1998 inzake de opening en de wijze van beheer van bepaalde tariefcontingenten voor de invoer van rijst en breukrijst (3), en met name op artikel 5, eerste alinea,
 Overwegende hetgeen volgt:
 (1)
 Verordening (EG) nr. 327/98 betreft de opening en de wijze van beheer van bepaalde tariefcontingenten voor de invoer van rijst en breukrijst die over landen van oorsprong en vervolgens over verscheidene deelperioden zijn verdeeld overeenkomstig bijlage IX bij die verordening.
 (2)
 De maand juli is de derde deelperiode voor het bij artikel 1, lid 1, onder a), van Verordening (EG) nr. 327/98 vastgestelde contingent en de tweede deelperiode voor de bij dat lid 1, onder b), c) en d), vastgestelde contingenten.
 (3)
 Blijkens de gegevens die overeenkomstig artikel 8, onder a), van Verordening (EG) nr. 327/98 zijn verstrekt, hebben voor de contingenten met de volgnummers 09.4154 — 09.4166 de aanvragen die overeenkomstig artikel 4, lid 1, van die verordening zijn ingediend gedurende de eerste tien werkdagen van de maand juli 2011, betrekking op een hoeveelheid die groter is dan de beschikbare hoeveelheid. Bijgevolg dient door vaststelling van de toewijzingscoëfficiënt die moet worden toegepast op de voor de betrokken contingenten aangevraagde hoeveelheden, te worden bepaald in hoeverre de invoercertificaten kunnen worden afgegeven.
 (4)
 Uit de bovenbedoelde gegevens blijkt overigens ook dat voor de contingenten met de volgnummers 09.4127 – 09.4128 – 09.4129 – 09.4148 – 09.4149 – 09.4150 – 09.4152 – 09.4153 de aanvragen die overeenkomstig artikel 4, lid 1, van die verordening zijn ingediend gedurende de eerste tien werkdagen van de maand juli 2011, betrekking hebben op een hoeveelheid die kleiner is dan de beschikbare hoeveelheid.
 (5)
 Derhalve dienen voor de contingenten met de volgnummers 09.4127 – 09.4128 – 09.4129 – 09.4130 – 09.4148 – 09.4112 – 09.4116 – 09.4117 – 09.4118 – 09.4119 – 09.4166 overeenkomstig artikel 5, eerste alinea, van Verordening (EG) nr. 327/98 de totale hoeveelheden te worden vastgesteld die beschikbaar zijn voor de volgende contingentsdeelperiode.
 (6)
 Met het oog op een efficiënt beheer van de procedure voor afgifte van de invoercertificaten dient deze verordening onmiddellijk na de bekendmaking ervan in werking te treden,
 HEEFT DE VOLGENDE VERORDENING VASTGESTELD:
 Artikel 1
 1. Op grond van de aanvragen voor certificaten voor de invoer van rijst in het kader van de bij Verordening (EG) nr. 327/98 vastgestelde contingenten met de volgnummers 09.4154 – 09.4166 die zijn ingediend gedurende de eerste tien werkdagen van de maand juli 2011, worden certificaten afgegeven voor de aangevraagde hoeveelheden, vermenigvuldigd met de in de bijlage bij de onderhavige verordening vastgestelde toewijzingscoëfficiënten.
 2. De totale hoeveelheden die in het kader van de bij Verordening (EG) nr. 327/98 vastgestelde contingenten met de volgnummers 09.4127 – 09.4128 – 09.4129 – 09.4130 – 09.4148 – 09.4112 – 09.4116 – 09.4117 – 09.4118 – 09.4119 – 09.4166 beschikbaar zijn voor de volgende contingentsdeelperiode, worden vastgesteld in de bijlage bij de onderhavige verordening.
 Artikel 2
 Deze verordening treedt in werking op de dag van de bekendmaking ervan in het Publicatieblad van de Europese Unie.
 Deze verordening is verbindend in al haar onderdelen en is rechtstreeks toepasselijk in elke lidstaat.
 Gedaan te Brussel, 27 juli 2011.
 Voor de Commissie, namens de voorzitter,
 José Manuel SILVA RODRÍGUEZ
 Directeur-generaal Landbouw en plattelandsontwikkeling
 (1) PB L 299 van 16.11.2007, blz. 1.
 (2) PB L 238 van 1.9.2006, blz. 13.
 (3) PB L 37 van 11.2.1998, blz. 5.
 BIJLAGE
 Hoeveelheden die overeenkomstig verordening (EG) nr. 327/98 moeten worden toegewezen voor de deelperiode juli 2011, respectievelijk beschikbaar zijn voor de daaropvolgende deelperiode
 a)
 Bij artikel 1, lid 1, onder a), van Verordening (EG) nr. 327/98 vastgesteld contingent voor volwitte of halfwitte rijst van GN-code 1006 30:
 Oorsprong
 Volgnummer
 Toewijzingscoëfficiënt voor de deelperiode juli 2011
 Totale hoeveelheid die beschikbaar is voor de deelperiode september 2011
 (in kg)
 Verenigde Staten van Amerika
 09.4127
 — (1)
 7 298 505
 Thailand
 09.4128
 — (1)
 2 448 174
 Australië
 09.4129
 — (1)
 605 300
 Andere landen van oorsprong
 09.4130
 — (2)
 538
 b)
 Bij artikel 1, lid 1, onder b), van Verordening (EG) nr. 327/98 vastgesteld contingent voor gedopte rijst van GN-code 1006 20:
 Oorsprong
 Volgnummer
 Toewijzingscoëfficiënt voor de deelperiode juli 2011
 Totale hoeveelheid die beschikbaar is voor de deelperiode oktober 2011
 (in kg)
 Alle landen
 09.4148
 — (3)
 1 536 000
 c)
 Bij artikel 1, lid 1, onder c), van Verordening (EG) nr. 327/98 vastgesteld contingent voor breukrijst van GN-code 1006 40:
 Oorsprong
 Volgnummer
 Toewijzingscoëfficiënt voor de deelperiode juli 2011
 Thailand
 09.4149
 — (4)
 Australië
 09.4150
 — (5)
 Guyana
 09.4152
 — (5)
 Verenigde Staten van Amerika
 09.4153
 — (4)
 Andere landen van oorsprong
 09.4154
 6,553804 %
 d)
 Bij artikel 1, lid 1, onder d), van Verordening (EG) nr. 327/98 vastgesteld contingent voor volwitte of halfwitte rijst van GN-code 1006 30:
 Oorsprong
 Volgnummer
 Toewijzingscoëfficiënt voor de deelperiode juli 2011
 Totale hoeveelheid die beschikbaar is voor de deelperiode september 2011
 (in kg)
 Thailand
 09.4112
 — (6)
 14 181
 Verenigde Staten van Amerika
 09.4116
 — (6)
 339
 India
 09.4117
 — (6)
 17 040
 Pakistan
 09.4118
 — (6)
 531
 Andere landen van oorsprong
 09.4119
 — (6)
 2 897
 Alle landen
 09.4166
 0,84246 %
 0
 (1) De aanvragen hebben betrekking op een hoeveelheid die kleiner is dan of gelijk is aan de beschikbare hoeveelheid: alle aanvragen zijn derhalve ontvankelijk.
 (2) Geen hoeveelheid meer beschikbaar voor deze deelperiode.
 (3) De aanvragen hebben betrekking op een hoeveelheid die kleiner is dan of gelijk is aan de beschikbare hoeveelheid: alle aanvragen zijn derhalve ontvankelijk.
 (4) Geen toewijzingscoëfficiënt van toepassing voor deze deelperiode: de Commissie is geen enkele certificaataanvraag meegedeeld.
 (5) Geen hoeveelheid meer beschikbaar voor deze deelperiode.
 (6) Geen hoeveelheid meer beschikbaar voor deze deelperiode.


type: wikipedia

text:
O Clube Atlético Metropolitano é um clube de futebol brasileiro sediado na cidade de Blumenau, Santa Catarina; fundado em 22 de janeiro de 2002, as suas cores oficiais são verde e branco.
 História
 O Clube Atlético Metropolitano nasceu em 22 de janeiro de 2002, a partir da união de pessoas e ideias, com o fim de resgatar o futebol blumenauense, afastado das principais competições oficiais desde 1998. Em seu nome, por sugestão do empresário Altair Carlos Pimpão, fez uma referência à Região Metropolitana de Blumenau. O presidente eleito para o primeiro biênio é Alfonso Santos Rogério.
 De seu embrião, gerado após sucessivos encontros entre pessoas ligadas a clubes amadores e empresários locais, surgiram os planos para seleção de atletas. Paralelamente, foram lançados em abril do mesmo ano o escudo, o uniforme e as cores verde e branca. Durante todo o primeiro semestre foram recrutados jogadores da região para a formação de seu elenco, que estrearia em agosto na sua primeira competição oficial, o Campeonato Catarinense da 2a Divisão.
 Em 04 de agosto, diante de um público aproximado de 800 pessoas no estádio do Sesi, o Metropolitano empatava em 0-0 com o Brusque, clube este já consolidado no futebol profissional estadual. O time blumenauense, dirigido pelo treinador Francis, entrou em campo com a seguinte escalação titular: Fabiano; Vando, Zeca, Márcio e Canhoto; Paulo, Luizinho, Ilson, Marquinhos; Polegar e Carioca.
 O ano de 2004 inicia com a posse do novo presidente do clube, Robert von der Heyde. O grande objetivo do ano é muito claro, o acesso à elite do futebol catarinense para o ano de 2005. Alcançar esta meta significaria ficar entre os oito primeiros colocados dentre os doze que disputariam o Catarinense da Série A2. Na competição, equipes já tradicionais do futebol estadual, como a Chapecoense, o Marcílio Dias, o Tubarão e o Atlético de Ibirama. Mesmo sabendo das dificuldades financeiras que sempre atravessam os participantes das competições de acesso à 1a Divisão, o Metropolitano resolve ousar e contrata o experiente e consagrado goleiro Ronaldo Giovanelli, ex-goleiro do Corinthians e da Seleção Brasileira. No entanto, é outra contratação, menos impactante, que acaba revelando o grande primeiro ídolo do clube: o atacante Diego Viana. Diego, gaúcho com passagens por Juventude e Avaí, torna-se o artilheiro da equipe na Série A2, havendo, inclusive, marcado o 100o gol oficial do Metropolitano.
 Depois de dois anos de profissionalismo, o Clube Atlético Metropolitano consegue o seu acesso a principal competição estadual de Santa Catarina, após seis anos ausente, Blumenau volta a ter um representante seu na principal competição estadual, pelas mãos do Metropolitano, com apenas dois anos de fundação, o caçula do futebol blumenauense.
 O ano de 2007 começa com um grupo de jogadores jovens, com a equipe sob o comando do treinador uruguaio Sérgio Ramirez. A campanha foi abaixo dos anos anteriores. Após um 7o lugar em 2005, 6o lugar em 2006, em 2007 o Metropolitano não vai além da 8a colocação. A competição acabou ficando marcada pelas trocas de treinadores. Além de Ramirez, comandaram a equipe durante o Catarinense: Cláudio Adão, Gérson Andreotti e Lio Evaristo. Foi com este último, o paranaense Lio Evaristo, que o time parece ter encontrado um melhor padrão de jogo.
 Convidado a disputar na Áustria o Torneio Internacional Centenário do FC Lustenau, o Metropolitano, que até então nunca havia disputado um jogo oficial fora de Santa Catarina, de repente se vê em gramados internacionais. Assim, em 15 de junho o Metropolitano estreia na competição enfrentando justamente os anfitriões, a equipe austríaca do FC Lustenau 07. O Verdão blumenauense se mostra um visitante indigesto e bate os donos da casa, em sua própria cidade e país, por 2-0 com gols de Eric e Flávio Guilherme. Conquistada a vaga na final, coube ao Metropolitano encarar o Fussballclub St. Gallen 1879, 5o lugar no Campeonato Suíço da 1a Divisão daquele ano. Como o adversário também era alviverde, coube aos blumenauenses jogarem com o uniforme reserva, o vermelho e branco, as cores da bandeira de Blumenau. Com um futebol envolvente, o Metropolitano não deu chances ao St. Gallen e conquistou o título vencendo, e convencendo, por 4-2 com gols de Eric (2), Flávio Guilherme e Leandrinho. A escalação titular de Lio Evaristo para a final foi: Cristiano; Arlan, Rafael, Cris e Márcio Silveira; Viton, Fabrício, Eric e Cairo; Flávio Guilherme e Leandro. Os torcedores em Blumenau, que acompanharam o jogo via internet, festejaram muito, saindo em carreata pela cidade. O Metropolitano chegava ao seu primeiro título profissional, e internacional, o que é um privilégio para poucos. Na chegada em Blumenau, outra festa em frente à Prefeitura.
 No Campeonato Catarinense de 2008, o Metropolitano acabou ficando a 4a colocação na classificação geral, garantindo assim a vaga para o Campeonato Brasileiro da Série C. No seu grupo também estavam o Brasil de Pelotas (RS), o Caxias (RS) e o J. Malucelli (PR). Infelizmente o metropolitano acabou ficando em último no grupo sendo eliminado na primeira fase.
 Buscando a vaga na Série D, fato que se consumou, o clube investiu pesado e trouxe o primeiro reforço estrangeiro no clube, Mariano Trípodi, ex jogador do Atlético MG e Santos. Além disso, o clube contou com a experiência do reconhecido técnico Roberval Davino. No Campeonato Catarinense de 2010, o Metropolitano ficou na 6a posição.
 Com a saída de Davino, o Metropolitano anunciou a contratação do vitorioso ex-zagueiro Cléber, que fez fama como jogador em grandes clubes como Palmeiras, Figueirense e Cruzeiro, para dar continuidade aos trabalhos visando a Copa Santa Catarina e a Série D do Campeonato Brasileiro. Infelizmente, o trabalho não deu os resultados que eram esperados pelo clube e torcida.
 Para 2011, o Metropolitano começou o Campeonato Catarinense treinado por Joceli dos Santos. Na segunda rodada do returno, Joceli foi dispensado e Lio Evaristo assumiu o time até o final do Campeonato Catarinense, sendo mantido para a disputa do Campeonato Brasileiro da Série D. Com a eliminação do Metropolitano desta competição, Lio Evaristo foi dispensado e Cairo Ribeiro, que era seu auxiliar, assumiu o comando técnico.
 Com a chegada de 2013, a participação no Catarinense, mais uma vez foi segura. Os resultados na competição asseguraram novamente a participação (quarta consecutiva) na Série D. O destaque individual ficou para o atacante Rafael Costa, que superou a marca dos 28 gols de Richardson na artilharia do clube. Assim, Rafael Costa se tornaria o maior goleador da história do Metropolitano, com 37 gols.
 Foi na Série D de 2013 que o Metropolitano sentiu de perto o gostinho de subir para a Série C. Classificado na fase inicial em primeiro lugar do grupo, enfrentou e superou o Santo André (SP) nas oitavas de final. Em seguida, nas quartas, a grande decisão contra o Juventude (RS). Quem passasse pelo confronto, ascenderia à Série C. No Sesi, um jogo tenso que resultou em duas expulsões - uma de cada lado. No placar, empate em 2-2. No jogo em Caxias do Sul, todo um misto de sentimentos de apreensão. Fortes chuvas ao longo da semana levaram Blumenau a sofrer uma enchente no final de semana da partida. Muitos torcedores mesmo sem saberem se conseguiriam voltar para suas casas, viajaram para assistir a partida. O jogo, como esperado, foi pegado, e por vezes violento. O Metropolitano suportou a pressão adversária e teve a melhor chance da partida, no final, 0-0. Com o 2-2 no Sesi, e placar agregado 2-2, novamente o Metropolitano ficava na igualdade mas era eliminado pelo gol fora de casa.
 A Copa Santa Catarina veio como oportunidade de conquistar um título e ao menos amenizar a decepção da Série D. A campanha foi boa e o Metropolitano realmente era a melhor equipe de todas as fases iniciais. No quadrangular final, que contou com a presença do Joinville, o Metropolitano encontraria um adversário mais experiente. De fato, na hora da decisão pesou a camisa do tricolor que fazia boa campanha na Série B do Brasileiro. Coube ao Metropolitano terminar com o vice na Copa Santa Catarina e a vaga garantida, mais uma vez, na Série D de 2014.
 Já que 2014 seria ano de Copa do Mundo, algumas mudanças foram feitas no calendário nacional. A Federação Catarinense, por exemplo, não fez a Copa Santa Catarina, e o Catarinense ficou um pouco mais curto. Com a base que quase subiu para a Série C em 2013, o Metropolitano fez uma excelente primeira fase no Estadual, terminando em primeiro lugar. A torcida novamente deu show, desconhecendo distâncias para seguir o time. A confirmação para o quadrangular final veio em Ibirama, numa verdadeira invasão de torcedores. Com a chegada do quadrangular decisivo que apontaria os dois finalistas, a boa fase acabou. O início até que não foi ruim,com empates diante do Joinville, fora de casa, e do Figueirense no Sesi. Mas a coisa desandou no jogo seguinte. Fazendo um jogo de superação, a equipe blumenauense segurava o 0-0 contra o Criciúma no sul do estado, até mesmo ameaçando o gol no contra-ataque. Porém, em um lance que contou com um erro do auxiliar, Paulo Baier, em impedimento, fez 1-0 e decretou a vitória do Tigre. Ali o Metropolitano perdeu a mão. Não se encontrou mais em campo na sequência da competição e terminou o Catarinense, e um honroso quarto lugar, ficando na frente de Avaí e Chapecoense.
 Outra vez na Série D, outra vez passando pela primeira fase. Superando o Boavista (RJ), a Penapolense (SP), o Pelotas (RS) e o Londrina (PR), o Metropolitano foi às oitavas enfrentar o Tombense (MG), sensação do campeonato mineiro. Assim como em 2012 diante do Mogi Mirim (SP), no confronto no Sesi o Metropolitano estava coma dupla de zaga titular suspensa, tendo que atuar com seus dois reservas. A falta de entrosamento e a pressão acabam refletindo no sistema defensivo. O placar em 1-1 em Blumenau levou a decisão para Tombos (MG).Em Minas Gerais o time comandado pelo treinador Pingo não consegue segurar o adversário. Derrota por 1-0 e eliminação. Outra vez o sonho do acesso fica adiado. Sem a Copa Santa Catarina no segundo semestre, coube ao clube se organizar para 2015.
 Se muitos duvidavam, muitos se surpreenderam. O ano de 2015 foi marcado por um dos menores investimentos históricos do Metropolitano no primeiro semestre, no Campeonato Catarinense, mas também por uma das melhores campanhas históricas do clube de Blumenau. Com uma das menores folhas salariais, a equipe comandada pelo técnico Pingo encerrou a competição na quinta colocação. Nomes como o do atacante Ariel, oriundo do futebol amador, ganharam a chance de colocar o seu nome na história do clube, e o mesmo ocorreu com um velho ídolo, o atacante argentino Mariano Trípodi, que retornou e foi uma das peças importantes no decorrer da campanha. Já no segundo semestre, a equipe não conseguiu repetir o mesmo desempenho. Por sua vez, o time contara com nomes de destaque no cenário nacional, como o atacante Lima e o zagueiro Renato Silva. O acesso ao Campeonato Brasileiro da Série C não foi alcançado, mas o planejamento permanecia focado em se destacar no futebol brasileiro.
 O ano de 2017 fica marcado na história do Metropolitano. Pela primeira vez o clube é rebaixado para a segunda divisão do Campeonato Catarinense, ficando na classificação geral, em 10o colocado. No segundo semestre, o clube participou do Campeonato Brasileiro da série D, enfrentando na primeira fase o São José-RS, o Ituano e o PSTC, ficando na segunda posição garantindo vaga na próxima fase. Na segunda fase, o Metropolitano enfrentou o São Bernardo, onde foi derrotado com um gol nos minutos finais. Com isso, e sem participar da Copa Santa Catarina, o clube fica sem calendário para 2017, aguardando e se preparando para 2018, na qual vai ter um longo caminho para voltar a primeira divisão do Catarinense.
 O ano de 2018 começou com o planejamento para o Campeonato Catarinense da Série B daquele ano. Com uma nova diretoria, o verdão tinha como objetivo subir a Série A novamente. O time começou o campeonato de forma tímida, terminando o primeiro turno na quinta colocação. Veio o segundo turno e com o técnico Marcelo Mabília o Metropolitano se encontrou e acabou ficando em segundo lugar no returno garantindo vaga na semifinal da competição. O primeiro jogo da semifinal foi contra o Camboriú em Blumenau, jogo vencido por 2x0. O segundo jogo foi vencido pelo time da casa pelo placar de 2x1 porém insuficiente para tirar a vaga da final e do acesso do Metropolitano. Veio a grande final, o adversário, o bem preparado Marcílio Dias. O primeiro jogo direto do estádio "Monumental do SESI" foi um encanto, 3x0 e direito a colocar uma mão na taça. O segundo jogo em Itajaí, não faltou emoção, 2x0 para o time do litoral, porém mesmo com o revés o Metropolitano acabou conquistando o primeiro título oficial de sua história.
 No ano de 2019, após meses de negociação o clube fez uma parceria junto com a empresa do ex-jogador André Santos a S27.
 Títulos
 Outras conquistas
 Torneio Centenário do FC Lustenau (2007)
 Futebol feminino
 Campeonato Municipal: Vice-campeão (2022)
 Participações
 Competições Oficiais
 Estádio
 O Complexo Esportivo Bernardo Werner, também conhecido como Estádio Monumental do Sesi, abrigou o maior número de partidas da equipe até então, sendo utilizado pelo clube desde sua fundação. As dimensões do gramado são de 106m x 75m. As arquibancadas são cobertas, com cadeiras para 3.624 pessoas e contam com tribunas e cabines para rádio e TV, além de amplo estacionamento. Ao redor do campo, pista de atletismo com 8 raias olímpicas.
 O ano de 2019 foi o último em que o Metropolitano utilizou o estádio. O SESI não renovou o contrato de aluguel com o clube pois de acordo com a entidade pretende direcionar o complexo esportivo para serviços de saúde e educação para os trabalhadores.
 Centro de treinamento
 O Centro de Treinamento Romeu Georg está localizado na cidade de Blumenau e pertence ao Metropolitano. O CT já possui o prédio que abriga os alojamentos, refeitórios, academia e a parte administrativa construído, além de campos e outras instalações já concluídas.
 Estatísticas e recordes
 Jogadores com mais partidas disputadas
 Jogadores com mais gols marcados
 Técnicos com mais partidas disputadas
 Presidentes
 Ver também
 Clássico de Blumenau
 Ligações externas
 Sítio oficial
 Clube Atlético Metropolitano
 Fundações em Santa Catarina em 2002


text:
 22.3.2013
 PL
 Dziennik Urzędowy Unii Europejskiej
 L 82/47
 ROZPORZĄDZENIE WYKONAWCZE KOMISJI (UE) NR 270/2013
 z dnia 21 marca 2013 r.
 zmieniające załącznik I do rozporządzenia (WE) nr 669/2009 w sprawie wykonania rozporządzenia (WE) nr 882/2004 Parlamentu Europejskiego i Rady w sprawie zwiększonego poziomu kontroli urzędowych przywozu niektórych rodzajów pasz i żywności niepochodzących od zwierząt
 (Tekst mający znaczenie dla EOG)
 KOMISJA EUROPEJSKA,
 uwzględniając Traktat o funkcjonowaniu Unii Europejskiej,
 uwzględniając rozporządzenie (WE) nr 882/2004 Parlamentu Europejskiego i Rady z dnia 29 kwietnia 2004 r. w sprawie kontroli urzędowych przeprowadzanych w celu sprawdzenia zgodności z prawem paszowym i żywnościowym oraz regułami dotyczącymi zdrowia i dobrostanu zwierząt (1), w szczególności jego art. 15 ust. 5,
 a także mając na uwadze, co następuje:
 (1)
 W rozporządzeniu Komisji (WE) nr 669/2009 (2) ustanowiono przepisy dotyczące zwiększonego poziomu kontroli urzędowych przywozu pasz i żywności niepochodzących od zwierząt, wymienionych w załączniku I do tego rozporządzenia („wykaz”), w miejscach wprowadzenia na terytoria wymienione w załączniku I do rozporządzenia (WE) nr 882/2004.
 (2)
 Zgodnie z art. 2 rozporządzenia (WE) nr 669/2009 wspomniany wykaz należy poddawać regularnemu, przynajmniej kwartalnemu przeglądowi, uwzględniając co najmniej źródła informacji wymienione w tym artykule.
 (3)
 Występowanie oraz znaczenie incydentów związanych z żywnością, zgłaszanych poprzez system wczesnego ostrzegania o niebezpiecznej żywności i paszach, ustalenia wynikające z kontroli przeprowadzonych przez Biuro ds. Żywności i Weterynarii w państwach trzecich oraz kwartalne sprawozdania dotyczące przesyłek pasz i żywności niepochodzących od zwierząt, przedkładane Komisji przez państwa członkowskie zgodnie z art. 15 rozporządzenia (WE) nr 669/2009, wskazują na potrzebę dokonania zmian w wykazie.
 (4)
 Należy w szczególności dokonać w wykazie zmian polegających na zmniejszeniu częstotliwości kontroli urzędowych towarów, w odniesieniu do których dostępne informacje wskazują na ogólną poprawę poziomu zgodności z odpowiednimi wymogami przewidzianymi w prawie unijnym i w odniesieniu do których nie jest już uzasadniona obecna częstotliwość kontroli urzędowych. Należy zatem odpowiednio zmienić wpis w wykazie dotyczący liści kolendry i bazylii pochodzących z Tajlandii w odniesieniu do częstotliwości kontroli bezpośrednich i identyfikacyjnych dotyczących obecności pozostałości pestycydów.
 (5)
 Należy zatem odpowiednio zmienić rozporządzenie (WE) nr 669/2009.
 (6)
 Środki przewidziane w niniejszym rozporządzeniu są zgodne z opinią Stałego Komitetu ds. Łańcucha Żywnościowego i Zdrowia Zwierząt,
 PRZYJMUJE NINIEJSZE ROZPORZĄDZENIE:
 Artykuł 1
 W załączniku I do rozporządzenia (WE) nr 669/2009 wpis dotyczący Tajlandii, rząd dotyczący „Liści kolendry” i „Bazylii (pospolitej, azjatyckiej)”„(Żywność – świeże zioła)”, w odniesieniu do częstotliwości kontroli bezpośrednich i identyfikacyjnych dotyczących obecności pozostałości pestycydów, otrzymuje brzmienie:
 „—
 Liście kolendry
 —
 ex 0709 99 90
 72
 Tajlandia (TH)
 Pozostałości pestycydów badane metodami wielopozostałościowymi opartymi na GC-MS i LC-MS lub metodami oznaczania pojedynczych pozostałości (4)
 10”
 —
 Bazylia (pospolita, azjatycka)
 —
 ex 1211 90 86
 20
 (Żywność – świeże zioła)
 Artykuł 2
 Niniejsze rozporządzenie wchodzi w życie trzeciego dnia po jego opublikowaniu w Dzienniku Urzędowym Unii Europejskiej.
 Niniejsze rozporządzenie stosuje się od dnia 1 kwietnia 2013 r.
 Niniejsze rozporządzenie wiąże w całości i jest bezpośrednio stosowane we wszystkich państwach członkowskich.
 Sporządzono w Brukseli dnia 21 marca 2013 r.
 W imieniu Komisji
 José Manuel BARROSO
 Przewodniczący
 (1) Dz.U. L 165 z 30.4.2004, s. 1.
 (2) Dz.U. L 194 z 25.7.2009, s. 11.


text:
De Waalse Furie in Dokkum was van 12 tot en met 15 september 1572 een Staatse bezetting tijdens de Tachtigjarige Oorlog, gevolgd door een bloedig ontzet van Waalse troepen in Spaanse dienst. Het ontzet moest een einde maken aan de gemeenschappelijke Geuzen-, boeren- en burgerbezetting van Dokkum onder leiding van hopman Sipke van Scheltema. Het ontzet ontaardde in een grootschalige plundering, gevolgd door een stadsbrand.
 Aanloop
 In augustus 1572 hadden de steden Sneek, Bolsward en Franeker zich in de lijst van opstandige steden geschaard. In september had Caspar de Robles (stadhouder van Friesland, Groningen en Drenthe tijdens het begin van de Tachtigjarige Oorlog) al kustplaatsen versterkt tegen plunderende Geuzen. In Dokkum had hij een extra bolwerk laten oprichten en er een bezetting achtergelaten. Deze bezetting deed regelmatig uitvallen in de omgeving, waar omringende dorpen zwaar onder moesten lijden. Binnen Dokkum hadden met name gereformeerden te lijden onder onmenselijke wreedheid. Joost van Schouwenburg, stadhouder van de prins, was van plan om Dokkum voor de Staatsen in te nemen. Hopmannen Sipke van Scheltema en Sikke Tjessens ondersteunden hem daarin, zij zouden heimelijk troepen werven. Caspar de Robles had vernomen van de plannen, waardoor de hoplieden moesten vluchten. Scheltema vluchtte naar Ameland, daar lag een boot met negentig Geuzen onder bevel van ene Gijbrecht. Samen waagden zij de aanslag op Dokkum.
 Geuzeninval
 Scheltema was met de Geuzengroep naar Dokkum gevaren met de bedoeling de stad in te nemen voor de prins. Zij kregen daarbij hulp van de op wraak beluste boeren uit de omgeving van Dokkum, zodat zij gezamenlijk op 12 september bewapend met hooivorken en knuppels de kleine bezetting uit Dokkum wisten te jagen. Uit naam van Willem van Oranje nam Scheltema de stad in, bejubeld door de burgers. De kerken werden geplunderd. Bijna alle geestelijken verlieten de stad, op een monnik na. Enkele katholieken en Waalse soldaten, die nog waren achtergebleven, waren de kerktoren in gevlucht, daar hadden zij zich verschanst in afwachting tot ontzet. Zij hadden voldoende wapens en munitie en voorraden tot hun beschikking. Ook enkele burgers wilden de stad verlaten uit vrees voor Spaanse represailles, maar dit werd hen uitdrukkelijk verboden. Mensen die katholieke vluchtelingen verborgen hielden in hun huis zouden op straffe des doods terecht worden gesteld. Enkele burgers werden opgepakt en opgesloten. Ze werden daarbij met stenen en mest bekogeld door de jeugd. De stad werd in staat van verdediging gebracht, ook vrouwen en kinderen moesten meehelpen. Met plaggen, takken en houten planken werd een stadswal opgeworpen en een gracht gegraven. Sikke Tjessens zou met de troepen van Schouwenburg vanuit Franeker ondersteuning bieden aan de Geuzen te Dokkum, maar de troepen van Caspar de Robles wisten dit te verhinderen. Intussen probeerden de Geuzen de verschanste katholieken en Walen uit de kerktoren te verdrijven. Hierbij werd de enige monnik die achtergebleven was, gevraagd hierin te komen bemiddelen. De verschansten wilden echter niet wijken, ondanks beloften van een vrije aftocht, ze wilden tot hun dood de toren bezet houden. Daarin waren ze zeer standvastig. Zelfs het beschieten van de kerktoren met een kanon deed hen niet wijken. Vanuit de toren werd met een roer gericht teruggeschoten op de belegeraars. In de kerktoren viel een dode, onder de burgers waren drie doden. Uiteindelijk stak men de toren in brand, de hele nacht werd het vuur aangewakkerd door de burgers. De stenen vloer had de verschansten echter gered, zij waren de volgende dag allemaal nog in leven, ondanks dat het bindwerk van de klokken gesmolten was. Terwijl men in Dokkum nog niet klaar was om een beleg te kunnen doorstaan, had Caspar de Robles met zijn vijfhonderd ervaren mannen voetvolk en zestig ruiters hun kamp opgeslagen in Oldenzijl. Zij waren op de vroege morgen van 15 september meteen naar Dokkum opgerukt.
 Ontzet en furie
 De boeren vluchtten daarop de stad uit, burgers bleven weerstand bieden in de verwachting op een mogelijk ontzet door troepen van Sikke Tjessens. Uit Groningen waren zestig ruiters gekomen die de Kollumnerpoort bestormden. Er volgden wederzijdse felle gevechten. Een burger kwam om het leven, twee Walen. Uiteindelijk weten de Walen door te breken bij de Hanspoort, de verdedigers waren op de vlucht geslagen waardoor deze poort onbewaakt bleek. De verschansten in de kerktoren wisten de Walen deze informatie door te seinen. De rest van de soldaten lagen in omsingeling rondom de stad. De Walen stormden intussen de stad in en sloegen iedereen op hun pad dood. De stedelingen probeerden zich te verschuilen op de zolders van de huizen. Diegenen die zich in de toren verschanst hadden, maar ook katholieke burgers die zich succesvol in de huizen verstopt hadden kwamen nu tevoorschijn en sloten zich aan bij hun bevrijders. Intussen was bij de Walen een razernij ontstaan. Een nietsontziende woede. Mannen, vrouwen en kinderen werden vermoord zonder onderscheid te maken tussen katholieken of gereformeerden. De lijken lagen over de straten verspreid, de straten waren roodgekleurd van het bloed. De helft van de bevolking werd gedood. Robles had hen de vrije hand gegeven, waarop de Walen van plunderen tot moorden overgingen, zij richtten een bloedbad aan. Daarna staken zij delen van de stad in brand, waarbij vele burgers omkwamen, die zich tijdens de furie op de zolders van hun huizen hadden verstopt. Burgers die Spaansgezind waren liepen met bosjes stro door de stad om gespaard te blijven. Hoewel ook velen van hen beroofd werden door hun "bevrijders". De troepen van Schouwenburg waren een uur verwijderd van Dokkum toen ze een bende Walen rijkelijk voorzien van buit in de richting van Leeuwarden zagen trekken. Na schermutselingen wisten zij een deel van de buit te redden, de Walen sloegen op de vlucht.
 Nasleep
 Door een stadsbrand brandde waarschijnlijk een groot deel van het stadje af. Volgens historische bronnen zouden ongeveer vierhonderd huizen werden in de as zijn gelegd. Uit resultaten van het dendrochronologisch laboratoriumonderzoek in opdracht van de stichting Historia Doccumensis in 20 panden in de binnenstad bleek echter dat waarschijnlijk niet de gehele stad werd platgebrand zoals tot dan toe gedacht was. Mogelijk betrof het alleen de westkant van het stadje. De stad moet snel opgebouwd zijn, in december dat jaar heeft Dokkum weer een nieuwe gemeenteraad, zij dienen een verzoek in voor vernieuwing van de stadsrechten. Deze worden in 1577 bevestigd door de koning.
 1572
 Dokkum
 Dokkum
 Geschiedenis van Noardeast-Fryslân
 Militaire operatie in de 16e eeuw
 Dokkum


type: caselaw

text:
 22.2.2014
 PL
 Dziennik Urzędowy Unii Europejskiej
 C 52/46
 Skarga wniesiona w dniu 30 grudnia 2013 r. — Asociación Española de Banca przeciwko Komisji Europejskiej
 (Sprawa T-701/13)
 2014/C 52/88
 Język postępowania: hiszpański
 Strony
 Strona skarżąca: Asociación Española de Banca (Madryt, Hiszpania) (przedstawiciele: J. Buendía Sierra, E. Abad Valdenebro, R. Calvo Salinero i A. Lamadrid de Pablo, adwokaci)
 Strona pozwana: Komisja Europejska
 Żądania
 Strona skarżąca wnosi do Sądu o:
 —
 stwierdzenie nieważności zaskarżonej decyzji w zakresie, w jakim Komisja zakwalifikowała w niej w niej całokształt środków, której jej zdaniem stanowią hiszpański system leasingu podatkowego, jako niezgodną z rynkiem wewnętrznym nową pomoc państwa;
 —
 tytułem żądania ewentualnego, stwierdzenie nieważności art. 1 i 4 zaskarżonej decyzji, w których Komisja wskazała inwestorów AIE jako beneficjentów ww. rzekomej pomocy i jedynych adresatów nakazu jej zwrotu;
 —
 tytułem żądania ewentualnego, stwierdzenie nieważności art. 4 zaskarżonej decyzji w zakresie, w jakim zawiera on nakaz odzyskania rzekomej pomocy;
 —
 stwierdzenie nieważności art. 4 zaskarżonej decyzji w zakresie, w jakim zawiera ono rozstrzygnięcie w przedmiocie legalności prywatnoprawnych umów zawieranych między inwestorami a innymi podmiotami, oraz
 —
 obciążenie Komisji kosztami postępowania.
 Zarzuty i główne argumenty
 Zarzuty i główne argumenty skargi są identyczne z podniesionymi przez skarżącą w sprawie T-700/13 Bankia przeciwko Komisji.


type: contracts

text:
 Avis juridique important
 |
 22000D1109(10)
 Beschluss des Gemeinsamen EWR-Ausschusses Nr. 55/1999 vom 30. April 1999 über die Änderung des Anhangs XIII (Verkehr) des EWR-Abkommens
 Amtsblatt Nr. L 284 vom 09/11/2000 S. 0015 - 0016
 Beschluss des Gemeinsamen EWR-AusschussesNr. 55/1999vom 30. April 1999über die Änderung des Anhangs XIII (Verkehr) des EWR-AbkommensDER GEMEINSAME EWR-AUSSCHUSS -gestützt auf das Abkommen über den Europäischen Wirtschaftsraum, geändert durch das Anpassungsprotokoll zum Abkommen über den Europäischen Wirtschaftsraum, nachstehend "Abkommen" genannt, insbesondere auf Artikel 98,in Erwägung nachstehender Gründe:(1) Anhang XIII des Abkommens wurde durch den Beschluss Nr. 40/1999 des Gemeinsamen EWR-Ausschusses vom 26. März 1999(1) geändert.(2) Die Verordnung (EG) Nr. 2135/98 des Rates vom 24. September 1998 zur Änderung der Verordnung (EWG) Nr. 3821/85 über das Kontrollgerät im Straßenverkehr und der Richtlinie 88/599/EWG über die Anwendung der Verordnungen (EWG) Nr. 3820/85 und (EWG) Nr. 3821/85(2) ist in das Abkommen aufzunehmen.(3) Die in Kapitel VI.A des Anhangs I der Akte über die Bedingungen des Beitritts der Republik Österreich, der Republik Finnland und des Königreichs Schweden und die Anpassungen der die Europäische Union begründenden Verträge(3) unter Nummer 3 aufgeführten Anpassungen der Verordnung (EWG) Nr. 3821/95 ist in das Abkommen aufzunehmen.(4) Anhang XIII des Abkommens muß infolge des Beitritts Österreichs, Finnlands und Schwedens zur Europäischen Union angepaßt werden -BESCHLIESST:Artikel 1In Anhang XIII des Abkommens wird unter Nummer 21 (Verordnung (EWG) Nr. 3821/85 des Rates)a) zwischen dem dritten und dem vierten Gedankenstrich eingefügt:"- 1 94 N: Akte über die Bedingungen des Beitritts der Republik Österreich, der Republik Finnland und des Königreichs Schweden und die Anpassungen der die Europäische Union begründenden Verträge (ABl. C 241 vom 29.8.1994, S. 21), angepasst durch ABl. L 1 vom 1.1.1995, S. 1).";b) Folgendes angefügt:"- 398 R 2135: Verordnung (EG) Nr. 2135/98 des Rates vom 24. September 1998 (ABl. L 274 vom 9.10.1998, S. 1), berichtigt in ABl. L 49 vom 25.2.1999, S. 46.Die Verordnung gilt für die Zwecke dieses Abkommens mit folgenden Anpassungen:a) In Kapitel IV.A des Anhangs IB wird unter Nummer 3 betreffend Seite 1 der Fahrerkarte dem Buchstaben a) Folgendes angefügt:'is: Ekilskort'.'no: Sjåførkort'.b) Der einleitende Satz unter Nummer 3 Buchstabe c) in Anhang IB Kapitel IV.A betreffend Seite 1 des Führerscheins erhält folgende Fassung:'das nationalitätszeichen des den Führerschein ausstellenden EFTA-Staates in einer Ellipse gemäß Artikel 37 des UN-Übereinkommens über den Straßenverkehr vom 8. November 1968 (mit demselben Hintergrund wie der Führerschein):'.c) In Kapitel IV.A des Anhangs IB wird unter Nummer 3 betreffend Seite 1 der Fahrerkarte dem Buchstaben c) Folgendes angefügt:'IS IslandFL LiechtensteinN Norwegen'."Artikel 2In Anhang XIII des Abkommens wird unter Nummer 23 (Richtlinie 88/599/EWG des Rates)a) die Anpassung sowie der dazugehörige einleitende Satz gestrichen;b) Folgendes eingefügt:"geändert durch- 398 R 2135: Verordnung (EG) Nr. 2135/98 des Rates vom 24. September 1998 (ABl. L 274 vom 9.10.1998, S. 1), berichtigt in ABl. L 49 vom 25.2.1999, S. 46."Artikel 3Der Wortlaut der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 2135/98 und der in Kapitel VI.A des Anhangs I der Akte über die Bedingungen des Beitritts der Republik Österreich, der Republik Finnland und des Königreichs Schweden und die Anpassungen der die Europäische Union begründenden Verträge unter Nummer 3 aufgeführten Anpassungen der Verordnung (EWG) Nr. 3821/85 in isländischer und norwegischer Sprache, der den jeweiligen Sprachfassungen dieses Beschlusses beigefügt ist, ist verbindlich.Artikel 4Dieser Beschluss tritt am 1. Mai 1999 in Kraft, sofern dem Gemeinsamen EWR-Ausschuss alle Mitteilungen nach Artikel 103 Absatz 1 des Abkommens vorliegen.Artikel 5Dieser Beschluss wird im EWR-Abschnitt und in der EWR-Beilage des Amtsblatts der Europäischen Gemeinschaften veröffentlicht.Brüssel, den 30. April 1999.Für den Gemeinsamen EWR-AusschussDer VorsitzendeF. Barbaso(1) ABl. L 266 vom 19.10.2000.(2) ABl. L 274 vom 9.10.1998, S. 1; Berichtigung: ABl. L 49 vom 25.2.1999, S. 46.(3) ABl. L 241 vom 29.8.1994, S. 21; Anpassung: ABl. L 1 vom 1.1.1995, S. 1.


jurisdiction: US

text: b"Report No. D-2008-136 September 30, 2008\n\n\n\n\nPayments for Patients Referred to Overseas\n Providers Under the Supplemental\n Health Care Program\n\x0cAdditional Information and Copies\nTo obtain additional copies of this report, contact the Secondary Reports Distribution\nUnit at (703) 604-8937 (DSN 664-8937) or fax (703) 604-8932.\n\nSuggestions for Audits\nTo suggest ideas for or to request future audits, contact the Office of the Deputy Inspector\nGeneral for Auditing at (703) 604-9142 (DSN 664-9142) or fax (703) 604-8932. Ideas\nand requests can also be mailed to:\n\n ODIG-AUD (ATTN: Audit Suggestions)\n Department of Defense Inspector General\n 400 Army Navy Drive (Room 801)\n Arlington, VA 22202-4704\n\n\n\n\nAcronyms and Abbreviations\nASD(HA) Assistant Secretary of Defense (Health Affairs)\nDFAS Defense Finance and Accounting Service\nMTF Military Treatment Facility\nSHCP Supplemental Health Care Program\nTMA TRICARE Management Activity\nU.S.C. United States Code\nWPS Wisconsin Physician Services\n\x0c INSPECTOR GENERAL\n DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE\n 400 ARMY NAVY DRIVE\n ARLINGTON, VIRGINIA Z2Z0Z\n\n\n September 30, 2008\n\nMEMORA DUM FOR ASSISTANT SECRETAR Y OF DEFENSE (HEALTil AFFAIRS)\n ASSISTA T SECRETAR Y OF THE AIR FORCE (FfNANCIAL\n MANAGEMENT AND COMPTROLLER)\n DIRECTOR. DEFENSE 1'1 ANCE AND ACCOUNTING SERVICE\n AUDITOR GENERAL, DEPARTMENT OF TI IE ARMY\n NA VAL INSPECTOR GENERAL\n\nSUBJECT: Payments for Patients Referred to Overseas Providers Under the Supplemental\n Health Care Program (Report No. D-2008-136)\n\n\nWe arc providing this report for your infom13tioll and usc. We considered comments from the\nAssistant Secretary of Defense (Health Affairs), the Surgeon General of the Air Force. and the\nDefense Finance and Accounting Service when preparing the final report.\n\nComments on the draft report conformed 10 the requirements of DoD Directive 7650.3 and left no\nunresolved issues. Therefore. no additional comments arc required.\n\nWe appreciate the courtesies extended to the starr: Please direct questions to Mr. Michael A.\nJoseph at (757) 872-4698 or Mr. James F. Degaraffal (757) 872-4815, extension 224. The learn\nmembers are listed inside the back cover.\n\x0c\x0c Report No. D-2008-136 (Project No. D2007-D000LF-0227.000)\n September 30, 2008\n\n Results in Brief: Payments for Patients\n Referred to Overseas Providers Under the\n Supplemental Health Care Program\n\nWhat We Did \xe2\x80\xa2 Transfer responsibility to a qualified\nThe objective of the audit was to determine health care claims processor for processing\nwhether controls are adequate over payments for and paying claims for overseas health care\npatients referred by military treatment facilities referred by military treatment facilities.\nto overseas health care providers under the \xe2\x80\xa2 Recoup funds for duplicate payments\nSupplemental Health Care Program. We identified during the audit (details\ncompared payments made by overseas military provided to TRICARE Management\ninstallations and three Defense Finance and Activity under separate cover).\nAccounting Service centers for referred \xe2\x80\xa2 Issue guidance to the Surgeons General of\noverseas health care to payments made by a the Army, Navy, and Air Force stating that\nTRICARE contractor that pays for most overseas military treatment facilities\nnonreferred overseas health care. should not deposit checks from TRICARE\n health care claims processors into military\nWhat We Found treatment facility accounts.\n We recommend that the Surgeon General of the\n\xe2\x80\xa2 Multiple organizations using independent Air Force issue guidance to all overseas military\n processes paid for overseas referred health treatment facilities to immediately discontinue\n care claims. depositing checks from TRICARE health care\n\xe2\x80\xa2 Using the limited overseas referred care data claims processors to military treatment facility\n available, we identified 90 duplicate accounts.\n payments by multiple organizations for\n overseas health care amounting to Client Comments and Our\n approximately $55,000 for FYs 2004\n through 2006, recoupment of which should Response\n result in $50,170 in potential monetary The Assistant Secretary of Defense (Health\n benefits to DoD. Affairs) concurred and plans to include these\n\xe2\x80\xa2 We identified duplicate payments at three payments in the new TRICARE Overseas\n Air Force military treatment facilities that Program contract to be awarded in FY 2009.\n used an interim payment process that The Surgeon General of the Air Force concurred\n violated the Miscellaneous Receipts Act and and plans to issue guidance to all overseas\n increased the risk of duplicate payments. military treatment facilities to cease depositing\n\xe2\x80\xa2 Significant potential exists for host-nation checks from TRICARE health care claims\n providers, patients, and military treatment processors into their accounts. The comments\n facility employees to abuse the payment by the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Health\n processes. Affairs) and the Surgeon General of the Air\n Force were responsive and meet the intent of the\nWhat We Recommend recommendations. We also received comments\n from the Defense Finance and Accounting\nWe recommend that the Assistant Secretary of Service.\nDefense (Health Affairs):\n\n\n i\n\x0c Report No. D-2008-136 (Project No. D2007-D000LF-0227.000)\n September 30, 2008\n\nRecommendations Table\nClient Recommendations No Additional Comments\n Requiring Comment Required\nAssistant Secretary of Defense 1.\n(Health Affairs)\n\nSurgeon General of the Air 2.\nForce\n\n\n\n\n ii\n\x0cTable of Contents\n\nResults in Brief i\n\nIntroduction 1\n\n Background 1\n Objective 2\n\nFinding. Payments for Claims Associated With the Supplemental Health Care\nProgram 3\n\n Duplicate Payments 3\n Independent Payment Processes 5\n Effects of Independent Payment Processes 5\n Need for Transfer of Processing and Payment Responsibilities 6\n Solicitation for Overseas Claims Processor 6\n Client Actions 7\n Client Comments on the Finding and Our Response 7\n Recommendations, Client Comments, and Our Response 8\n\nAppendix\n\n A. Scope and Methodology 11\n Review of Internal Controls 13\n Prior Coverage 14\n\nClient Comments\n\n Assistant Secretary of Defense (Health Affairs) 15\n Department of the Air Force 20\n Defense Finance and Accounting Service 21\n\x0c\x0cIntroduction\nBackground\nThe DoD Supplemental Health Care Program (SHCP) was established to pay private\nsector health care providers who treat active-duty Service members. The SHCP also\ncovers health care services ordered by military treatment facility (MTF) providers for\nnon-active-duty Service members when the MTF provider maintains responsibility for\ntreating the patients. The SHCP in overseas locations covers patients referred by MTFs\nto host-nation health care providers. A referral takes place when the overseas MTF\ncannot provide the necessary health care and must rely on host-nation providers.\n\nOfficials from the Offices of the Army, Navy, and Air Force Surgeons General told us\nthat three Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) centers should be paying\nmost of the claims for overseas health care referred by MTFs. However, we could not\nidentify any guidance issued by the TRICARE Management Activity (TMA) that assigns\nresponsibility for making these payments. Additionally, some military installations make\npayments for overseas referred health care. The patients or the host-nation providers\nsubmit claims for the health care to the MTFs, which review the health care claims and\nauthorize payments by DFAS and military installations. DFAS and the military\ninstallations are responsible only for paying the claims, not for certifying that the claims\nare valid. Patients that use host-nation providers without being referred are not covered\nunder the SHCP. Patients or the host-nation providers submit claims for nonreferred\nhealth care to claims-processing contractors. Although Surgeons General officials told us\nthat DFAS should be paying for the majority of the overseas referred health care,\nWisconsin Physician Services (WPS) also received and paid referred health care claims.\nWPS, a subcontractor for the TRICARE South Regional contractor, is responsible for\npaying for most of the nonreferred overseas health care. The Director of TMA manages\noverseas health care purchased from host-nation providers.\n\nTMA estimated that DFAS paid approximately $39.3 million in FY 2006 for referred\ncare. However, that estimate may not be accurate because no central database of referred\ncare exists, and referral records requested from overseas MTFs were sometimes missing\nor incomplete. We determined whether multiple organizations were paying for the same\nhealth care services by obtaining databases of referred health care from the overseas\nMTFs and comparing data in those databases with payments made by TRICARE\ncontractors. According to the Offices of the Surgeons General of the Army, Navy, and\nAir Force, 60 overseas MTFs referred patients to overseas providers; we received files\nfrom 51 of the MTFs. We were able to match data for only 23 of the 51 MTFs from\nwhich we received data because the databases from the remaining 28 MTFs were missing\ndates of service or Social Security numbers. In addition, three of the MTF databases that\nwe were able to use were incomplete, missing records for referred health care for specific\nfiscal years included in the request. We could not perform a complete review of\nduplicate payments because of the missing and incomplete referred care data.\n\n\n\n\n 1\n\x0cObjective\nThe objective of the audit was to determine whether controls are adequate over payments\nfor patients referred to overseas health care providers under the Supplemental Health\nCare Program. See Appendix A for a discussion of the scope and methodology and our\nreview of internal controls.\n\n\n\n\n 2\n\x0cFinding. Payments for Claims Associated\nWith the Supplemental Health Care Program\nWe identified duplicate payments by multiple organizations for claims associated with\nthe SHCP. Specifically, we identified 90 duplicate payments paid by multiple\norganizations for referred overseas health care amounting to approximately $55,000 for\nFYs 2004 through 2006. Additionally, we identified duplicate payments at three Air\nForce MTFs that used DFAS to make interim payments using SHCP accounts and used a\nTRICARE contractor to reimburse those accounts. Substantial risk exists that host-nation\nproviders, patients, and MTF employees could abuse the independent payment processes\nof multiple payers to receive duplicate payments, significantly increasing unnecessary\ncosts to DoD. Additionally, the three MTFs using DFAS to make interim payments\nviolated section 3302 (b), title 31, United States Code (31 U.S.C. 3302 (b)), \xe2\x80\x9cCustodians\nof Money,\xe2\x80\x9d commonly referred to as the \xe2\x80\x9cMiscellaneous Receipts Act,\xe2\x80\x9d by depositing\nfunds into their accounts without authority. To mitigate the risk of duplicate payments\nresulting from the independent payment processes, DoD should transfer to a qualified\nhealth care claims processor responsibility for processing and paying claims for overseas\nreferred health care. The Surgeon General of the Air Force should also issue guidance to\nall overseas military treatment facilities to immediately discontinue depositing checks\nfrom TRICARE health care claims processors to military treatment facility accounts.\n\nDuplicate Payments\nUsing the limited overseas referred care data available from 23 overseas MTFs, we\nidentified 90 duplicate payments for referred overseas health care that WPS and DFAS or\noverseas military installations made amounting to $55,081 from FYs 2004 through 2006.\nHowever, before our review WPS recouped some of the funds for 10 of the 90 duplicate\npayments, amounting to $4,910. If TMA recoups the remaining 80 duplicate payments,\nits action should result in one-time potential monetary benefits of $50,170 to DoD\nAccount 97X0130 for the year in which the payments are recouped. We reviewed\napproximately 22,000 records of care referred by MTFs. See the following table for the\nresults of our duplicate payment review.\n\n Results of Duplicate Payment Review, by Military Department\nReviewed Item Army Navy Air Force Total\nMTF referrals matched to 4,423 7,977 10,013 22,413\ndatabase of all overseas\npayments made by TMA\ncontractors\nDuplicate payments 53 4 33 90*\nValue of duplicate $21,915 $17,014 $16,152 $55,081\npayments\n*We provided details to TMA on each of the duplicate payments under separate cover to allow\nDoD to begin recouping them from the host-nation providers and patients.\n\n\n\n\n 3\n\x0cTo perform our duplicate payment reviews, we matched individual MTF referral\ndatabases to a TMA contractor database that included payments made by WPS. We then\nreviewed supporting documentation provided by WPS, DFAS, and installations that made\npayments. However, we did not receive all of the databases requested from the overseas\nMTFs, and some of the databases we received were missing critical information. Also\nwe were unable to review documentation for some of the potential duplicate payments we\nidentified because of missing or incomplete documentation. Therefore, we consider the\nduplicate payments and amounts that we identified conservative.\n\nAdditionally, we identified duplicate payments at three Air Force MTFs that used DFAS\nto make interim payments using SHCP accounts and used a TRICARE contractor to\nreimburse those accounts. The three Air Force MTFs asked DFAS to pay for services\nnormally paid for by WPS, using the MTFs\xe2\x80\x99 SHCP accounts until WPS made the\npayments. The MTFs usually asked WPS to send them reimbursement checks, made\npayable to the patient or a designated MTF employee. When the MTFs received checks\nfrom WPS, MTF officials asked the patients to endorse the checks and then deposited\nthem in the MTFs\xe2\x80\x99 SHCP accounts. Because the duplicate payments by WPS were\nreimbursements to the MTF accounts, there were only minimal unnecessary costs to DoD\nrelated to differences in calculating payments.\n\nHowever, if the patient or the designated employee at the MTF received the check\ndirectly, the patient or employee could have cashed the check and kept the funds instead\nof turning over the check to the MTF. We reviewed check deposits for 33 of the 35 WPS\npayments to the patients and MTF employees at two of the three MTFs. We did not find\nany indications that patients or MTF employees received and retained the checks for their\npersonal use.\n\nAccording to Air Force personnel, the MTFs are using the interim payments to pay\nproviders more quickly. Many of the personnel we spoke to during the audit expressed\nconcerns that, if timely payments are not made to the host-nation providers, the providers\nmay stop treating DoD beneficiaries. The MTFs rely heavily on these host-nation\nproviders for services to DoD beneficiaries that the MTFs cannot perform. Therefore,\ntimely payments to host-nation providers by the overseas health care claims processor are\ncritical to maintain the good relationships MTFs have established with the providers and\nensure continued treatment of DoD beneficiaries.\n\nFor most of the payments we reviewed, however, we found that WPS paid more quickly.\nWe were able to determine the amount of time it took for DFAS and WPS to make\npayments for two of the three MTFs that use this interim payment process. We analyzed\n35 payments for health care from four host-nation providers for the two MTFs and found\nthat WPS paid more quickly than DFAS for 24 of 35 payments and paid in the same\namount of time as DFAS for 2 of the 35 payments. Additionally, we identified multiple\npayments made by TRICARE contractors for each of the four host-nation providers for\nnonreferred care. For those payments, the interim payment process was not used, and the\nproviders continued to treat DoD beneficiaries.\n\n\n\n\n 4\n\x0cIndependent Payment Processes\nThe duplicate overseas health care payments occurred because DoD used multiple\norganizations with independent payment processes to pay for overseas health care. The\norganizations did not access prior payment information from other organizations as part\nof their payment processes. Also, we found inconsistencies in the way organizations\ncalculated benefits.\n\nAccess to Prior Payment Information\nOrganizations that pay overseas health care claims did not access prior payment\ninformation from other paying organizations when making payments. The three DFAS\ncenters that we visited did not make their overseas health care payment information\navailable to TRICARE contractors, other DFAS centers, or military installations making\noverseas health care payments. The three DFAS centers each use stand-alone systems\nunique to the Military Departments that the DFAS centers serve. Additionally, the DFAS\ncenters and the installations that make payments do not compile their payment\ninformation in a central database. Therefore, TRICARE contractors making overseas\nhealth care payments could not access prior overseas health care payments made by\nDFAS or the installations to determine whether claims submitted had already been paid.\nAdditionally, the individual DFAS centers could not determine whether claims submitted\nby those centers had already been paid by other DFAS centers. WPS makes information\non its overseas health care payments available to patients and Government personnel\nthrough a Web-based system. However, the payment procedures used by the three DFAS\ncenters we visited and the three MTFs we visited did not include accessing that system to\ndetermine whether prior payments had already been paid. Without access to previous\npayment information, the organizations processed health care claims without any\nknowledge of whether those claims had already been paid by other organizations.\n\nInconsistencies in Benefit Calculations\nOverseas MTFs and WPS also calculated benefits inconsistently for 15 of 100 health care\nclaims, resulting in overpayments of $5,599. We reviewed 100 health care claims sent to\nboth DFAS and WPS for the same health care. WPS denied charges for 13 of the\n100 claims because they were for noncovered services. WPS also applied a deductible to\n1 of the 100 claims, reducing DoD\xe2\x80\x99s portion of the claim. However, MTFs authorized\nDFAS to make payment in full for each of these health care claims.\n\nEffects of Independent Payment Processes\nAs a result of the independent payment processes, substantial risk exists that host-nation\nproviders, patients, and MTF employees could exploit the weaknesses of the processes,\nsignificantly increasing unnecessary costs to DoD. Also, the independent payment\nprocesses allowed the three Air Force MTFs to request interim payments, which resulted\nin making deposits to their SHCP accounts in violation of the Miscellaneous Receipts\nAct.\n\n\n\n\n 5\n\x0cRisk of Unnecessary Costs to DoD\nWe did not find indications of fraudulent submission of health care claims for the\nduplicate payments we identified. However, substantial risk exists that host-nation\nproviders, patients, and MTF employees could exploit the weaknesses in the independent\npayment processes, significantly increasing unnecessary costs to DoD. Under the\ncurrent, completely separate payment processes, the organizations processing and paying\noverseas health care claims do not view or track invoices being paid by other\norganizations. Therefore, those organizations would continue to pay for claims already\npaid by other organizations.\n\nIn a previous audit of TRICARE overseas controls, we found that controls were not\nadequate to ensure third-party billing agencies were properly submitting overseas claims.\nOne billing agency exploited overseas payment control weaknesses and overcharged\nDoD by approximately $100 million. Health care providers and patients could similarly\nexploit the weaknesses we identified in this report.\n\nViolation of Miscellaneous Receipts Act\nThe three Air Force MTFs that requested interim payments violated the Miscellaneous\nReceipts Act by depositing checks received from WPS to their SHCP accounts. The\nMTFs lacked the authority to retain funds from TRICARE claims processors. The Act\nstates that \xe2\x80\x9can official or agent of the Government receiving money for the Government\nfrom any source shall deposit the money in the Treasury as soon as practicable without\ndeduction for any charge or claim.\xe2\x80\x9d\n\nNeed for Transfer of Processing and Payment\nResponsibilities\nBy transferring responsibility for processing and paying overseas referred health care\nclaims to a qualified health care claims processor, DoD could mitigate the risk of\nmultiple organizations with independent payment processes paying for the same overseas\nhealth care. We could not determine why DFAS and some installations were responsible\nfor paying overseas referred health care claims while responsibility for paying for most\noverseas care has shifted to health care claims processors. By allowing the MTFs,\nDFAS, and installations to authorize or pay for referred overseas health care, DoD has\ncreated independent payment processes that allow duplicate payments and create the\npotential for fraudulent submission and reimbursement of overseas health care claims.\n\nAdditionally, TRICARE overseas claims processors that pay overseas claims have more\nexpertise than the overseas MTFs in reviewing overseas health care claims. The overseas\nclaims processors process more than 1 million health care claims per year and can\nquickly determine whether services are covered and calculate patient cost shares and\ndeductibles.\n\nSolicitation for Overseas Claims Processor\nTMA developed a draft contract solicitation to rebid responsibility for payment of\noverseas health care claims currently being paid by TRICARE health care claims\n\n\n 6\n\x0cprocessors. Objectives of the solicitation include processing health care claims,\nachieving beneficiary and provider satisfaction, and developing and managing host-\nnation provider services. The solicitation includes processing health care claims for some\ncategories of active-duty personnel and for the following categories of DoD beneficiaries\nliving outside the continental United States:\n\n \xe2\x80\xa2 TRICARE Overseas Program Prime,\n \xe2\x80\xa2 TRICARE Overseas Program Prime Remote-enrolled,\n \xe2\x80\xa2 TRICARE Standard,\n \xe2\x80\xa2 TRICARE for Life, and\n \xe2\x80\xa2 TRICARE Reserve Select.\n\nThe draft solicitation language allows TMA to add responsibilities in the future for\nprocessing and paying for health care referred by MTFs. However, the draft does not\ncurrently include those responsibilities. The draft solicitation states that claims for health\ncare referred by MTFs are within the scope of the contract and that the Government may\ndirect that these claims be processed and paid under this contract.\n\nWe commend TMA for including the option of adding care referred by MTFs in this\nsolicitation. However, TMA should consider including the responsibility for processing\nand paying for care referred by MTFs in the contract solicitation before issuing it.\nTimely transfer of responsibility for payment of overseas referred health care is essential\nto reducing the risk of additional duplicate payments and potential fraudulent claims\nsubmission. If the contract is not awarded, however, TMA should pursue other avenues\nto transfer responsibility for processing and paying for overseas health care claims for\nhealth care referred by military treatment facilities to a qualified health care claims\nprocessor as quickly as possible.\n\nClient Actions\nTMA has already begun to take actions to mitigate the risk of duplicate payments. TMA\npersonnel are planning to require WPS to submit reports of overseas payments to\noverseas MTFs. TMA plans to issue guidance to the overseas MTFs to require them to\nreview the WPS reports monthly to determine whether claims they receive have already\nbeen paid by WPS. Implementation of these actions should help reduce the potential for\nduplicate payments until TMA can transfer responsibility for paying for overseas referred\nhealth care claims to a qualified health care claims processor.\n\nClient Comments on the Finding and Our Response\nAssistant Secretary of Defense (Health Affairs) Comments\nThe Assistant Secretary of Defense (Health Affairs) ASD(HA) nonconcurred with our\nassessment that an internal control weakness existed. The Assistant Secretary stated that\nTMA is in the process of assuming the adjudication and payment of all overseas claims\nby a qualified health care claims processor under the TRICARE Overseas Program\ncontract. He also stated that TMA is establishing interim reporting procedures that will\n\n\n 7\n\x0cincorporate appropriate internal controls to mitigate the risk of potential duplicate\npayments.\n\nOur Response\nWe agree that the planned actions by TMA will mitigate the risk of duplicate payments.\nHowever, until those actions are implemented, an internal control weakness exists that\nallows multiple organizations to make duplicate payments for the same health care.\n\nDefense Finance and Accounting Service Comments\nThe Director, Indianapolis Operations responded to a statement in our draft report that the\naudit could not find any guidance assigning responsibility for making the payments\ndiscussed in the report. The Director stated that the DoD Financial Management\nRegulation and the DoD Guidebook for Miscellaneous Payments cover the payments\nreviewed during the audit. The Director also stated that the wording in the draft report\nmay mislead the reader to believe that DFAS was derelict in its duty. He stated that\nDFAS should not be misconstrued as a health care claims processor or the certifier of the\npayments discussed in the report.\n\nOur Response\nWe agree that the DoD Financial Management Regulation and the DoD Guidebook for\nMiscellaneous Payments cover the payments reviewed during the audit. However, TMA,\nwhich manages overseas health care purchased from host-nation providers, had not issued\nguidance that assigned responsibility to make these payments. We changed the wording\nof the report to reflect this. We also changed the wording of the report to clarify that\nDFAS only makes payments on the claims reviewed in this report and that it does not\ncertify that the claims are valid.\n\nRecommendations, Client Comments, and Our\nResponse\n1. We recommend that the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Health Affairs):\n\n a. Transfer responsibility to a qualified health care claims processor for\n processing and paying claims for overseas health care referred by\n military treatment facilities.\n\n b. Recoup funds expended through duplicate payments identified during the\n audit (we provided details to TRICARE Management Activity on each of\n the duplicate payments under separate cover).\n\n c. Issue guidance to the Surgeons General of the Army, Navy, and Air Force\n stating that overseas military treatment facilities should not deposit\n checks from TRICARE health care claims processors into military\n treatment facility accounts.\n\n\n\n\n 8\n\x0cAssistant Secretary of Defense (Health Affairs) Comments\nThe ASD(HA) concurred. The Assistant Secretary stated that TMA plans to assume the\nadjudication and payment for all overseas health care claims under the new TRICARE\nOverseas Program contract to be awarded in FY 2009, with health care delivery to begin\nin FY 2010. The Assistant Secretary stated that an interim process will be established\nwhereby reports of claims paid under the current overseas claims processing contract will\nbe distributed to TRICARE Area Offices and MTFs. MTF commanders will be required\nto validate that their claims have not been paid by another source and certify that this\nreview was completed and no duplicate payments were identified. The Assistant\nSecretary also recognized the $50,170 of potential monetary benefits the audit reported as\na one-time monetary benefit to the Defense Health Program and stated that recoupment\nactions will be conducted by the respective Service Medical Departments. Additionally,\nthe Assistant Secretary stated that he sent a memorandum to the Service Assistant\nSecretaries (Manpower and Reserve Affairs) requesting they discontinue the practice of\nmaking interim payments for non-referred health care and depositing reimbursements\nfrom TRICARE health care claims processors into MTF accounts. The Assistant\nSecretary included the memorandum dated July 3, 2008, with his comments on this\nreport.\n\nOur Response\nThe ASD(HA) comments are responsive. The actions planned and taken by the Assistant\nSecretary satisfy the intent of the recommendation.\n\nAir Force Comments\nAlthough not required to comment on Recommendation 1.a., the Surgeon General of the\nAir Force stated that his office will comply with the Assistant Secretary\xe2\x80\x99s resolution of\nthe finding when it is published. The Surgeon General stated that, until that time, the\nMTFs will need to continue paying for overseas referred health care claims using\noverseas Purchased Health Care funds. The Surgeon General also stated that the MTFs\nwill not seek reimbursement from health care claims processors and will conduct\npayment reconciliations with those claims processors to mitigate duplicate payments.\n\nDefense Finance and Accounting Service Comments\nAlthough not required to comment on Recommendation 1.b., the Director, Indianapolis\nOperations stated that any collection efforts for duplicate payments made by a DFAS site\nmust be coordinated with the site responsible for the accounting of the charged entity.\n\n2. We recommend that the Surgeon General of the Air Force issue guidance to all\noverseas military treatment facilities to immediately discontinue depositing checks\nfrom TRICARE health care claims processors to military treatment facility\naccounts.\n\n\n\n\n 9\n\x0cAir Force Comments\nThe Surgeon General of the Air Force concurred. The Surgeon General stated that his\noffice would issue guidance to all overseas MTFs to immediately cease depositing checks\nfrom TRICARE health care claims processors to MTF accounts.\n\nOur Response\nThe Surgeon General of the Air Force comments are responsive. The actions planned by\nthe Surgeon General satisfy the intent of the recommendation.\n\n\n\n\n 10\n\x0cAppendix A. Scope and Methodology\nWe conducted this performance audit from September 23, 2007, through July 24, 2008,\nin accordance with generally accepted government auditing standards. Those standards\nrequire that we plan and perform the audit to obtain sufficient, appropriate evidence to\nprovide a reasonable basis for our findings and conclusions based on our audit objective.\nWe believe that the evidence obtained provides a reasonable basis for our findings and\nconclusions based on our audit objective.\n\nThe audited entities included the ASD(HA); TMA; the Offices of the Surgeons General\nof the Army, Navy, and Air Force; DFAS Limestone; DFAS Rome; DFAS Japan; WPS;\nand three MTFs in Japan (BG Crawford F. Sims U.S. Army Health Clinic, U.S. Naval\nHospital Yokosuka, and the 374th Medical Group Yokota). We did not visit any of the\nmilitary installations that make payments for overseas referred care.\n\nWe interviewed personnel at WPS, DFAS, and the MTFs we visited. We reviewed\nprocedures and controls used in processing and paying overseas health care claims at\nWPS and the DFAS centers. We reviewed procedures and controls used to make and\ntrack referrals to host-nation providers and procedures and controls used to authorize\npayments for referred care at the three MTFs we visited.\n\nWe reviewed public laws, the Code of Federal Regulations, and DoD and TMA\nregulations to identify procedures and requirements established for the SHCP related to\npatients referred to host-nation providers. Specifically, we reviewed 31 U.S.C. 3302 (b),\n\xe2\x80\x9cCustodians of Money,\xe2\x80\x9d commonly referred to as the \xe2\x80\x9cMiscellaneous Receipts Act\xe2\x80\x9d;\nCode of Federal Regulations, Title 32, Chapter 2, Section 199.7, \xe2\x80\x9cClaims Review,\xe2\x80\x9d and\nSection 199.16, \xe2\x80\x9cSupplemental Health Care Program for Active Duty Members\xe2\x80\x9d; and\nTRICARE Policy Manual 6010.54-M, August 1, 2002, Chapter 12, Section 11.1,\n\xe2\x80\x9cManaged Care Support Contractor Responsibilities for Claims Processing.\xe2\x80\x9d The dates\nof the documents reviewed range from February 21, 1996, through March 21, 2008.\n\nDuplicate Payment Review\nWe reviewed whether controls were adequate over payments for patients referred to host-\nnation providers by determining whether duplicate payments were made by DFAS, some\nmilitary installations, and WPS. We obtained files from different organizations paying\noverseas health care claims, we reviewed supporting documentation, and we reviewed\ninterim payments made for nonreferred care using SHCP funds.\n\nHealth care claims for patients who are not referred by MTFs, such as retirees living\noverseas and patients treated in remote locations, are paid under six different TRICARE\ncontracts. WPS, a subcontractor for the TRICARE South Regional contractor, is\nresponsible for paying for most of the overseas health care. We limited our review to\nDFAS, the overseas military installations that make payments, and WPS.\n\n\n\n\n 11\n\x0cRequest for Databases\nWe attempted to obtain databases for all health care referred by overseas MTFs from\nFY 2004 through FY 2006. However, no organization maintained a complete database of\npayments for all overseas referred health care. According to the Offices of the Surgeons\nGeneral of the Army, Navy, and Air Force, 60 overseas MTFs referred patients to\noverseas providers; we received files from 51 of these MTFs. We were able to match\ndata for only 23 of 51 MTFs from which we received data because the databases from the\nremaining 28 MTFs were missing dates of service or Social Security numbers. In\naddition, three of the MTF databases that we were able to use were incomplete, missing\nrecords for referred health care for specific fiscal years included in the request. We could\nnot perform a complete review of duplicate payments because of the missing and\nincomplete referred care data. We assumed that all of the data included in the databases\nwe received were for referred care. See table for a summary of our MTF referral\ndatabase request.\n\n MTF Referral Database Request\nMTF Information Army Navy Air Force Total\nMTFs generating 36 11 13 60\nreferrals*\nMTFs from which we 30 10 11 51\nreceived databases\nMTF databases we were 10 5 8 23\nable to match\nMTF databases with all 10 4 6 20\nrequested fiscal years\nthat we were able to\nmatch\n*\n Data for number of MTFs generating referrals are based on information provided to us that we could not\nverify.\n\nAdditionally, we used data obtained for a previous audit from the Purchased Care Detail\nInformation System. The data included all TRICARE contractor payments for overseas\ncare with dates of service from FY 2004 through July 2006. Because the data were\ncollected in July of 2006 and TRICARE health care claims may be submitted up to 12\nmonths past the date of service, our audit results may not reflect all eligible claims,\nespecially for FY 2006. We determined whether multiple organizations were paying for\nthe same health care services by comparing these databases using dates of service and\nSocial Security numbers.\n\nReview of Supporting Documentation\nWe identified potential duplicate payments by matching MTF databases to data from the\nPurchased Care Detail Information System. However, we limited our review to potential\nduplicate payments made by WPS because it makes the majority of overseas contractor\npayments. We then attempted to obtain from WPS, DFAS centers, and military\ninstallations supporting documentation including host-nation provider invoices,\nauthorizations for payment, and documentation showing payment was made.\n\n\n 12\n\x0cWe compared the documentation received from the three DFAS sites and some military\ninstallations that make payments for overseas referred health care with the documentation\nreceived from WPS to determine whether multiple organizations made payments to the\nhost-nation providers or patients. When we found that multiple organizations had made\npayments for the same claim, we calculated the amounts of those overpayments. We\nreduced the potential monetary benefits for the amounts that had already been recouped\nprior to our review. Additionally, we reviewed 100 claims for the same services paid by\nboth DFAS and WPS to determine whether the organizations processed the payments\nconsistently.\n\nInterim Payments\nWe reviewed an interim payment process at three MTFs for care that was not referred by\nthe MTFs. We identified those payments through our database matches for two MTFs\nbecause the MTFs were requesting DFAS to make interim payments using SHCP funds\nand then seeking reimbursement from WPS. We identified the payments for one MTF by\nvisiting it and reviewing its internal controls for authorizing payments. We reported on\nthose payments because SHCP funds were used to pay for that care.\n\nReview of Internal Controls\nWe identified an internal control weakness for the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Health\nAffairs) (ASD[HA]) as defined by DoD Instruction 5010.40, \xe2\x80\x9cManagers\xe2\x80\x99 Internal Control\n(MIC) Program Procedures,\xe2\x80\x9d January 4, 2006. The ASD(HA) did not establish adequate\ninternal controls over payment processes for overseas health care to ensure that duplicate\npayments were not made by different organizations.\n\nBecause of limited data available for our review, we could not determine the magnitude\nof the weakness. In two previous audit reports, we reported internal control weaknesses\nin the TRICARE Overseas Program that relate to overseas claims- processing and\npayment procedures (Report Number D-2008-045 and Report Number D-2006-051).\nThis report further documents control weaknesses in overseas claims processing.\nImplementing the recommendations in the previous reports and implementing\nRecommendation 1. in this report will reduce the potential for duplicate payments by the\ndifferent organizations.\n\nUse of Computer-Processed Data\nWe used data from the Purchased Care Detail Information System to identify potential\nduplicate payments. We did not perform a formal reliability assessment of the computer-\nprocessed data. However, during the review we established reliability for the specific\npotential duplicate payments by comparing claims documentation with the information\nprovided from the Purchased Care Detail Information System. The comparisons showed\nthat the data were sufficient to support the conclusions. We limited our results to the\npotential duplicate payments for which we obtained documentation, and we did not make\nany statistical projections.\n\n\n\n\n 13\n\x0cUse of Technical Assistance\nWe used the Quantitative Methods Directorate of the DoD Office of the Inspector\nGeneral to generate an extract from the Purchased Care Detail Information System\ndatabase that we obtained from a previous audit of Controls Over the TRICARE\nOverseas Health Care Program.\n\nPrior Coverage\nNo reports on payments for overseas referred health care were issued during the last\n5 years.\n\n\n\n\n 14\n\x0cAssistant Secretary of Defense (Health Affairs) Comments\n\n\n\n\n Click to add JPEG file\n\n\n\n\n 15\n\x0cClick to add JPEG file\n\n\n\n\n 16\n\x0cClick to add JPEG file\n\n\n\n\n 17\n\x0cClick to add JPEG file\n\n\n\n\n 18\n\x0cClick to add JPEG file\n\n\n\n\n 19\n\x0cDepartment of the Air Force Comments\n\n\n\n\n Click to add JPEG file\n\n\n\n\n 20\n\x0cDefense Finance and Accounting Service Comments\n\n\n\n\n Click to add JPEG file\n\n\n\n\n 21\n\x0cClick to add JPEG file\n\n\n\n\n 22\n\x0cTeam Members\nThe Department of Defense Office of the Deputy Inspector General for Auditing,\nReadiness and Operations Support Directorate prepared this report. Personnel of the\nDepartment of Defense Office of Inspector General who contributed to the report are\nlisted below.\n\nJoseph R. Oliva\nRobert F. Prinzbach II\nMichael A. Joseph\nJames A. O\xe2\x80\x99Connell\nJames F. Degaraff\nKimberly D. Brothers\nLaToya H. Garner\nKimberly M. Crenshaw\nH. David Barton\nAllison E. Tarmann\n\x0c\x0c"


text:
С И Г Н А Л ЗА НАРУШЕНИЕ НА ЗАКОНА ЗА ОБЩЕСТВЕНИТЕ ПОРЪЧКИ В ОБЩИНА ЯМБОЛ И ОБЩИНСКИ СЪВЕТ ЯМБОЛ
 С И Г Н А Л за проверка от Инициативен комитет „Да спасим град Ямбол от Кмета“ - гр.Ямбол ул.“Н.Петрини“ 37
 Относно: Наемане на външни юристи и изплатени възнаграждения в големи размери за адвокатски услуги в нарушение на Закона за обществените поръчки (ЗОП) по дела в административни, окръжни, апелативни, касационни и ... съдилища, Комисия защита на конкуренцията (КЗК), ... на Община Ямбол и Общински съвет Ямбол
 След като в медиите и от ответници, страни по дела с община Ямбол и ОбС Ямбол, изтече откъслечна информация за изплатени адвокатски хонорари в големи размери по окончатено загубени дела (а и не само) от Община Ямбол и Общински съвет Ямбол представлявани съответно от кмета Георги Иванов Славов и Данаил Георгиев Ибришимов и направена справка на страницата на Община Ямбол в раздел „Профил на купувача“ констатирахме, че в периода от началото на 2013 година до настоящия момент, месец Май 2019г., няма обявена нито една обществена поръчка за такъв род услуга, а сумите изплатени за това многократно надхвърлят праговете определени в ЗОП! В случая не е определящ критерия „загубени или спечелени“ дела, а размера на договорените и изплатени хонорари преди началото на всяко дело на различни съдебни инстанции! Щети на община Ямбол са нанесени от разлики в изплатените прекомерни адвокатски хонорари и признатите от съда такива, като в някои случаи разликата е почти два и повече пъти?! И всичко това при наличие на цяла дирекция „Правни дейности“ в община Ямбол
 http://www.yambol.bg/%D1%81%D1%82%D1%80%D1%83%D0%BA%D1%82%D1%83%D1%80%D0%B0/%D0%BE%D0%B1%D1%89%D0%B0-%D0%B0%D0%B4%D0%BC%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%81%D1%82%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%86%D0%B8%D1%8F/%D0%B4%D0%B8%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%BA%D1%86%D0%B8%D1%8F-%D0%BF%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%BD%D0%B8-%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%B9%D0%BD%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B8 - с 12 (дванадесет) служители към настоящия момент?!
 Директор на дирекция„Правни дейности”:
 1. Мариана Петрова тел. 046/681423, етаж 4, стая 423
 2. Главен юрисконсулт: Мария Караиванова - тел. 046/681439, ет.4, стая 439
 3. Старши юрисконсулт: Даниела Желева - тел. 046/681422, ет.4, стая 422
 4. Старши юрисконсулт: Таня Едрева - тел. 046/681422, ет.4, стая 422
 5. Старши юрисконсулт: Свилен Раднев- тел. 046/681439, ет.4, стая 439
 6. Юрисконсулт: Пепа Василева- тел. 046/681422, ет.4, стая 422
 7. Юрисконсулт: Стефка Христозова - тел. 046/681422, ет.4, стая 422
 8. Юрисконсулт: Лидия Кръстева - тел. 046/681422, ет.4, стая 422
 9. Юрисконсулт: Калоян Анастасов - тел. 046/681422, ет.4, стая 422
 10. Главен експерт: Мария Дончева- тел. 046/681428, ет.4, стая 428
 11. Главен експерт: Весела Атанасова- тел. 046/681428, ет.4, стая 428
 12. Главен експерт: Малина Трингова- тел. 046/681423, ет.4, стая 423
 Като примери в подкрепа на това са:
 1. Дело за Градски парк, улици „Ал.Стамболийски“ и „Страхил“ и парк „Боровец“ срещу община Ямбол - окончателно и влязло в сила Решение срещу община Ямбол по търговско дело 57/2012 на Ямболски окръжен съд, потвърдено от Апелативен съд Бургас и Върховен Касационен съд на Република България – щета за около 750 000лв включително изплатен адвокатски хонорар от страна на община Ямбол от около 30 000 лв;
 2. Дела (две или три) по ЗМДТ срещу Министерство на отбраната за неплатени данъци по закона (абсолютно елементарни искови молби, но за сериозни суми и съотвветно сериозно адвокатски хонорари), но непризнати в пълния им размер адвокатски хонорар договорен и изплатен от община Ямбол - Административно дело 206 / 2014г. на Административен съд Ямбол, Решение No10549 от 12.10.2015 на ВАС и Определение No163 от 07.01.2016 на ВАС;
 3. Няколко дела в Комисия защита на конкуренцията (КЗК) по ЗОП по издадени незаконосъобразни решения по обществени поръчки за възлагане на СМР и услуги от кмета на община Ямбол - Решение No АКТ-879-02.08.2018 на КЗК; Решение No АКТ-1294-15.11.2018; Решение No АКТ-1337-15.10.2014; Решение No АКТ-1415-23.10.2013; Решение No АКТ-444-23.04.2013, ... ;
 4. Обречени дела по Закона за достъп до обществена информация (ЗДОИ) – всички до едно загубени от кмета на община Ямбол;
 5. Дела за обещетения и пропуснати ползи вследствие на отменени заповеди на кмета за събаряне на сгради - Административно дело No 64/2019 на Административен съд Ямбол, Административно дело No 321/2018 на Административен съд Ямбол, ...
 6. Дела срещу протести на Окръжна прокуратура Ямбол и граждани по повод незаконосъобразни решения на ОбС Ямбол и кмета на община Ямбол – за незаконосъобразна неприсъствена („абонаментна“ такса за ползване на детска ясла или детска градина. )месечна такса от 10 лв за дете в детките ясли и градини на община Ямбол и ... - адм. дело No 35/2017 г. от Административен съд Ямбол; приети незаконосъобразни нормативни актове на ОбС Ямбол; отменени заповеди на кмета на община Ямбол - адм. дело No118/ 2014 г. на Административен съд – Ямбол (адм. Дело No 15204/2014 на ВАС); ...
 7. Дела в Административен съд Ямбол: Административно дело 95 / 2019г. на Административен съд Ямбол, Административно дело 64 / 2019г. на Административен съд Ямбол, Административно дело 104 / 2019г. на Административен съд Ямбол, Административно дело 107 / 2019г. на Административен съд Ямбол, Административно дело 284 / 2018г. на Административен съд Ямбол, Административно дело 126 / 2019г. на Административен съд Ямбол, Административно дело 50 / 2019г. на Административен съд Ямбол, Административно дело 133 / 2019г. на Административен съд Ямбол, Административно дело 360 / 2017г. на Административен съд Ямбол, Административно дело 267 / 2018г. на Административен съд Ямбол, Административно дело 70 / 2018г. на Административен съд Ямбол – и съответните им обжалвания пред ВАС на РБългария
 8. Дела във ВАС София: Административно дело 11579 / 2018 на ВАС, Административно дело 4827 / 2018 на ВАС, Административно дело 5134 / 2018 на ВАС, Административно дело 4807 / 2018 на ВАС, Административно дело 4800 / 2018 на ВАС, Административно дело 4805 / 2018 на ВАС, Административно дело 5177 / 2018 на ВАС, Административно дело 4804 / 2018 на ВАС, Административно дело 5703 / 2018 на ВАС, Административно дело 5718 / 2018 на ВАС, Административно дело 5705 / 2018 на ВАС, Административно дело 4801 / 2018 на ВАС, Административно дело 4802 / 2018 на ВАС, Административно дело 4803 / 2018 на ВАС;
 9. Определение No13766 от 09.11.2018 на ВАС, Решение No8361 от 20.06.2018 на ВАС, Решение No8349 от 20.06.2018 на ВАС, Решение No12846 от 24.10.2018 на ВАС, Решение No11573 от 02.10.2018 на ВАС, Решение No13490 от 06.11.2018 на ВАС, Решение No16080 от 20.12.2018 на ВАС, Решение No9249 от 06.07.2018 на ВАС, Решение No13412 от 05.11.2018 на ВАС, Решение No11461 от 27.09.2018 на ВАС, Решение No11458 от 27.09.2018 на ВАС, Решение No11976 от 08.10.2018 на ВАС, Решение No12354 от 15.10.2018 на ВАС, Решение No12351 от 15.10.2018 на ВАС.
 Това са само част от делата, за които открихме информация. Със сигурност има още много такива, но въпреки исканията ни за това (включително и по Закона за достъп до обществена информация (ЗДОИ)), от община Ямбол отказват да предоставят информация?!
 В подкрепа на сигнала ни за проверка е и Определение No12946 от 25.10.2018 по Дело No9901/2018 на ВАС на РБългария, който се произнася относно прекомерност на претендираните разходи (заплатени от кмета на община Ямбол), като прави анализ на одобрената структура на община Ямбол, числеността на Дирекция „Правни дейности“ и вменените им съгласно Устройствения правилник на Община Ямбол задължения за изготвяне на искови молби, жалби, възражения, писмени защити по образувани съдебни дела, както и осъществяване на процесуално представителство пред всички органи на съдебната власт:
 „ Съгласно Устройствения правилник на Община Ямбол, утвърден от Кмета на общината на 05.01.2016г. в Общата администрация е създадена Дирекция „Правни дейности“, чиято щатна численост е 12 бройки със следните длъжности : Директор на дирекция – 1, Главен юрисконсулт – 1, Старши юрисконсулт – 3, Юрисконсулт – 4, Главен експерт – 3. В чл.23, т.3 и т.8 от Устройствения правилник на Община Ямбол са разписани правомощията на служителите от Дирекция „Правни дейности“ като изрично е установено задължението им за изготвяне на искови молби, жалби, възражения, писмени защити по образувани съдебни дела, както и осъществяване на процесуално представителство пред всички органи на съдебната власт.
 Предвид наличието на подобен правен ресурс от високо подготвени юристи отговарящи на нормативноустановените изисквания за заемане на съответните длъжности по Закона за държавния служител и след депозиране на молба за оттегляне на искането за отмяна на влязло в сила съдебно решение, изцяло в дискреционната власт на Кмета на Община Ямбол е осъщественото упълномощаване и заплащане на разноски за процесуално представителство на външна адвокатска кантора в размер на 6000 лева /шест хиляди лева/.
 Съгласно т. 3 от Тълкувателно решение No 6 от 6.11.2013 г. на ВКС по тълк. дело No 6/2012 г. на ОСГК на ВКС при намаляване на подлежащо на присъждане адвокатско възнаграждение поради прекомерност по реда на чл. 78, ал. 5 ГПК съдът не е обвързан от предвиденото в § 2 от ДР на НаредбаNo 1/9.07.2004 г. ограничение и е свободен да намали възнаграждението до предвидения в същата наредба минимален размер.
 Изложеното по-горе обосновава извод за прекомерност на заплатеното адвокатско възнаграждение в размер на 6000 лева /шест хиляди лева/, поради което на основание чл.78, ал.5 ГПК във вр. чл.144 АПК, разноските в полза на Община Ямбол следва да бъдат намалени съобразно минималния размер, определен в чл.8, ал.3 от Наредба No 1 от 9.07.2004 г. за минималните размери на адвокатските възнаграждения – 500 лева /петстотин лева/.“
 След направени справки по някои от делата се оказва, че кмета Георги Славов и председателя на Общински съвет Ямбол Данаил Ибришимов упълномощават винаги едно и също Адвокатско дружество „Данаилов, Дренски, Неделчев и Ко“ рег.ф.д.No 26 / 2008г. на Софийски градски съд, Булстат 175456983, с адрес гр.София ул.“Княз Борис I” No 98 ет.4, представлявано от Димитър Иванов Данаилов, които от своя страна преупълномощават други адвокати да ги представляват по делата на община Ямбол и ОбС Ямбол, а в някои случаи и на гл.архитект на община Ямбол?!
 Адвокатските хонорари са значителни и това е нарушението от страна на кмета на Община Ямбол и председателя на ОбС Ямбол (което е предмет на сигнала ни за проверка и трябва да се провери от прокуратурата), че без проведена обществена поръчка за адвокатски услуги се харчи значителен финансов обществен ресурс надвишаващ праговете по ЗОП.
 За изясняване на цялата фактическа обстановка е задължително да се изискат от община Ямбол всички изплатени суми от 2013г. до днес (включително издадени фактури и платежните документи към тях) като адвокатски възнаграждения по дела, по които община Ямбол, общински съвет Ямбол и главния архитект на община Ямбол са страна, като се съобразят с праговете по ЗОП и какво е основанието им за възлагане и изплащане от страна на кмета на община Ямбол без проведена обществена поръчка по ЗОП?! Има ли сключени договори за това, на каква стойност?
 Съдържащата се в настоящия сигнал за проверка информация е публично достояние и може да бъде открита чрез системата за отдалечен достъп на интернет страницата на съответния съд или на сайта на Висшия съдебен съвет - https://legalacts.justice.bg/