type: caselaw

jurisdiction: EU

text:
 26.11.2005
 SK
 Úradný vestník Európskej únie
 C 296/3
 ROZSUDOK SÚDNEHO DVORA
 (tretia komora)
 zo 6. októbra 2005
 vo veci C-291/03 (návrh na začatie prejudiciálneho konania podaný VAT and Duties Tribunal, Manchester): MyTravel plc proti Commissioners of Customs & Excise (1)
 (Šiesta smernica o DPH - Úprava týkajúca sa cestovných kancelárií - Dovolenkový balík služieb - Služby poskytnuté tretími osobami a vlastné služby - Postup pre výpočet dane)
 (2005/C 296/06)
 Jazyk konania: angličtina
 Vo veci C-291/03, ktorej predmetom je návrh na začatie prejudiciálneho konania podľa článku 234 ES podaný rozhodnutím VAT and Duties Tribunal, Manchester (Spojené kráľovstvo) z 30. júna 2003 a doručený Súdnemu dvoru 4. júla 2003, ktorý súvisí s konaním: MyTravel plc a Commissioners of Customs & Excise, Súdny dvor (tretia komora), v zložení: predseda tretej komory A. Borg Barthet (spravodajca), sudcovia J.-P. Puissochet, S. von Bahr a U. Lõhmus, generálny advokát: P. Léger, tajomník: M. M. Ferreira, hlavná referentka, vyhlásil 6. októbra 2005 rozsudok, ktorého výrok znie:
 1)
 Cestovná kancelária alebo usporiadateľ zájazdov, ktorý vypísal daňové priznanie o dani z pridanej hodnoty za zdaňovacie obdobie tak, že použil postup upravený vnútroštátnym právnym poriadkom preberajúcim šiestu smernicu Rady 77/388/EHS zo 17. mája 1977 o zosúladení právnych predpisov členských štátov týkajúcich sa daní z obratu – spoločný systém dane z pridanej hodnoty: jednotný základ jej stanovenia, má právo prepočítať svoju daňovú povinnosť v súvislosti s daňou z pridanej hodnoty podľa postupu, o ktorom Súdny dvor rozhodol, že je v súlade s právom Spoločenstva, a to za podmienok upravených vnútroštátnym právom, ktoré musia rešpektovať zásady rovnocennosti a efektívnosti.
 2)
 Článok 26 šiestej smernice 77/388 má byť vykladaný v tom zmysle, že cestovná kancelária alebo usporiadateľ zájazdov, ktorý za zaplatenie ceny za balík služieb poskytuje turistovi jednak služby poskytnuté tretími osobami a jednak vlastné služby, v zásade musí oddeliť časť balíka služieb predstavujúcu jeho vlastné služby na základe ich trhovej hodnoty, ak táto hodnota môže byť stanovená. V takomto prípade platiteľ dane môže použiť kritérium skutočných nákladov iba ak preukáže, že toto kritérium verne odzrkadľuje skutočné zloženie balíka služieb. Uplatnenie kritéria trhovej hodnoty nepodlieha ani podmienke, že toto uplatnenie je jednoduchšie ako uplatnenie postupu založeného na skutočných nákladoch, ani podmienke, že bude viesť k daňovej povinnosti rovnakej alebo podobnej daňovej povinnosti, ktorá by vyplynula z použitia postupu založeného na skutočných nákladoch. V dôsledku toho:
 —
 cestovná kancelária alebo usporiadateľ zájazdov nemôže použiť podľa vlastnej úvahy postup založený na trhovej hodnote a
 —
 tento postup sa uplatní na vlastné služby, ktorých trhová hodnota môže byť stanovená, aj keď v priebehu toho istého zdaňovacieho obdobia hodnota niektorých častí vlastných služieb nemôže byť stanovená, keďže platiteľ dane nepredáva podobné služby mimo rámca balíka služieb.
 3)
 Vnútroštátnemu súdu prináleží určiť, so zreteľom na okolnosti vnútroštátneho sporu, trhovú hodnotu leteniek poskytnutých vo vnútroštátnom spore v rámci dovolenkového balíka služieb. Tento súd môže určiť uvedenú hodnotu prostredníctvom priemerných veličín. V tomto kontexte trh založený na letenkách predaných iným usporiadateľom zájazdov môže predstavovať ten najprimeranejší trh.
 (1) Ú. v. EÚ C 213, 6.9.2003.


type: contracts

text:
 31.10.2013
 LV
 Eiropas Savienības Oficiālais Vēstnesis
 L 291/19
 EEZ APVIENOTĀS KOMITEJAS LĒMUMS
 Nr. 64/2013
 (2013. gada 3. maijs),
 ar ko groza EEZ līguma II pielikumu (Tehniskie noteikumi, standarti, testēšana un sertifikācija)
 EEZ APVIENOTĀ KOMITEJA,
 ņemot vērā Līgumu par Eiropas Ekonomikas zonu (“EEZ līgums”) un jo īpaši tā 98. pantu,
 tā kā:
 (1)
 EEZ līgumā jāiekļauj Komisijas 2012. gada 31. augusta Īstenošanas regula (ES) Nr. 788/2012 par saskaņotu Eiropas Savienības daudzgadu kontroles programmu 2013., 2014. un 2015. gadam, lai nodrošinātu atbilstību maksimāli pieļaujamajiem pesticīdu atlieku līmeņiem augu un dzīvnieku izcelsmes pārtikā un uz tās un novērtētu šo atlieku iedarbību uz patērētājiem (1).
 (2)
 Ar Īstenošanas regulu (ES) Nr. 788/2012 atceļ Komisijas Īstenošanas regulu (ES) Nr. 1274/2011 (2), kas ir iekļauta EEZ līgumā un līdz ar to saskaņā ar EEZ līgumu ir jāatceļ.
 (3)
 Šis lēmums attiecas uz tiesību aktiem pārtikas produktu jomā. Tiesību akti par pārtikas produktiem neattiecas uz Lihtenšteinu, kamēr uz to attiecina Nolīgumu starp Eiropas Kopienu un Šveices Konfederāciju par lauksaimniecības produktu tirdzniecību, kā tas ir precizēts EEZ līguma II pielikuma XII nodaļas ievadā. Tādēļ šis lēmums nav piemērojams Lihtenšteinai.
 (4)
 Tādēļ būtu attiecīgi jāgroza EEZ līguma II pielikums,
 IR PIEŅĒMUSI ŠO LĒMUMU.
 1. pants
 EEZ līguma II pielikuma XII nodaļu groza šādi:
 1)
 svītro 68. punkta (Komisijas Īstenošanas regula (ES) Nr. 1274/2011) tekstu;
 2)
 pēc 73. punkta (Komisijas Regula (ES) Nr. 1048/2012) iekļauj šādu tekstu:
 “74.
 32012 R 0788: Komisijas 2012. gada 31. augusta Īstenošanas regula (ES) Nr. 788/2012 par saskaņotu Eiropas Savienības daudzgadu kontroles programmu 2013., 2014. un 2015. gadam, lai nodrošinātu atbilstību maksimāli pieļaujamajiem pesticīdu atlieku līmeņiem augu un dzīvnieku izcelsmes pārtikā un uz tās un novērtētu šo atlieku iedarbību uz patērētājiem (OV L 235, 1.9.2012., 8. lpp.).
 Šā Līguma vajadzībām regulas noteikumus pielāgo šādi:
 a)
 regulas 1. pantam pievieno šādu tekstu:
 “Islande 2013., 2014. un 2015. gadā var turpināt noņemt paraugus un veikt analīzes attiecībā uz to pašu 61 pesticīdu, kas novērots tās tirgū esošajos pārtikas produktos 2012. gadā.”;
 b)
 regulas II pielikuma 5. punktam pievieno šādu tabulu:
 “IS
 12 (*)
 15 (**)
 NO
 12 (*)
 15 (**)””
 2. pants
 Īstenošanas regulas (ES) Nr. 788/2012 teksts islandiešu un norvēģu valodā, kas jāpublicē Eiropas Savienības Oficiālā Vēstneša EEZ papildinājumā, ir autentisks.
 3. pants
 Šis lēmums stājas spēkā 2013. gada 4. maijā, ja ir iesniegti visi paziņojumi saskaņā ar EEZ līguma 103. panta 1. punktu (3).
 4. pants
 Šo lēmumu publicē Eiropas Savienības Oficiālā Vēstneša EEZ iedaļā un tā EEZ papildinājumā.
 Briselē, 2013. gada 3. maijā
 EEZ Apvienotās komitejas vārdā –
 priekšsēdētājs
 Gianluca GRIPPA
 (1) OV L 235, 1.9.2012., 8. lpp.
 (2) OV L 325, 8.12.2011., 24. lpp.
 (3) Konstitucionālās prasības nav norādītas.


type: legislation

text:
 2.4.2020
 HU
 Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja
 L 102/1
 A BIZOTTSÁG (EU) 2020/478 VÉGREHAJTÁSI RENDELETE
 (2020. április 1.)
 az új élelmiszerek uniós jegyzékének megállapításáról szóló (EU) 2017/2470 bizottsági végrehajtási rendelet helyesbítéséről
 (EGT-vonatkozású szöveg)
 AZ EURÓPAI BIZOTTSÁG,
 tekintettel az Európai Unió működéséről szóló szerződésre,
 tekintettel az új élelmiszerekről, az 1169/2011/EU európai parlamenti és tanácsi rendelet módosításáról, valamint a 258/97/EK európai parlamenti és tanácsi rendelet és az 1852/2001/EK bizottsági rendelet hatályon kívül helyezéséről szóló, 2015. november 25-i (EU) 2015/2283 európai parlamenti és tanácsi rendeletre (1) és különösen annak 8. cikkére,
 mivel:
 (1)
 Az (EU) 2015/2283 rendelet 8. cikke szerint a Bizottságnak 2018. január 1-jéig létre kellett hoznia a 258/97/EK európai parlamenti és tanácsi rendelet (2) alapján engedélyezett vagy bejelentett új élelmiszerek uniós jegyzékét.
 (2)
 A 258/97/EK európai parlamenti és tanácsi rendelet alapján engedélyezett vagy bejelentett új élelmiszerek uniós jegyzékét az (EU) 2017/2470 bizottsági végrehajtási rendelet (3) állapította meg.
 (3)
 Az (EU) 2018/1023 bizottsági végrehajtási rendelet (4) helyesbítette az (EU) 2017/2470 végrehajtási rendeletet és annak mellékletét egy új melléklettel váltotta fel számos, az eredeti uniós jegyzékben nem szereplő engedélyezett vagy bejelentett új élelmiszer felvétele céljából.
 (4)
 Az (EU) 2017/2470 végrehajtási rendelet és az (EU) 2018/1023 végrehajtási rendelet közzétételét követően élelmiszer-vállalkozók további hibát találtak az (EU) 2017/2470 végrehajtási rendelet mellékletében, amiről értesítették a Bizottságot.
 (5)
 Az élelmiszer-vállalkozók és a tagállami illetékes hatóságok számára biztosítandó egyértelműség és jogbiztonság érdekében helyesbítésre van szükség, hogy biztosítva legyen az új élelmiszerek uniós jegyzékének megfelelő végrehajtása és felhasználása.
 (6)
 A Schizochytrium sp. (T18) olaj új élelmiszerként való engedélyezése a 258/97/EK rendelet 5. cikke szerinti értesítési eljárás keretében történt. A Schizochytrium sp. (T18) olaj specifikációjában a feltüntetett savszám értéke tévesen ≤ 0,5 mg KOH/g-ként szerepel a tényleges ≤ 0,8 mg KOH/g érték helyett. Az új élelmiszereknek az (EU) 2017/2470 végrehajtási rendelet értelmében létrehozott uniós jegyzékében is ugyanez a téves érték szerepelt.
 (7)
 Ezért az (EU) 2017/2470 végrehajtási rendelet mellékletének 2. táblázatában a Schizochytrium sp. (T18) olaj savszámára vonatkozó specifikációt ennek megfelelően helyesbíteni kell.
 (8)
 Az e rendeletben előírt intézkedések összhangban vannak a Növények, Állatok, Élelmiszerek és Takarmányok Állandó Bizottságának véleményével,
 ELFOGADTA EZT A RENDELETET:
 1. cikk
 Az (EU) 2017/2470 végrehajtási rendelet melléklete e rendelet mellékletének megfelelően helyesbítésre kerül.
 2. cikk
 Ez a rendelet az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapjában való kihirdetését követő huszadik napon lép hatályba.
 Ez a rendelet teljes egészében kötelező és közvetlenül alkalmazandó valamennyi tagállamban.
 Kelt Brüsszelben, 2020. április 1-jén.
 a Bizottság részéről
 az elnök
 Ursula VON DER LEYEN
 (1) HL L 327., 2015.12.11., 1. o.
 (2) Az Európai Parlament és a Tanács 258/97/EK rendelete (1997. január 27.) az új élelmiszerekről és az új élelmiszer-összetevőkről (HL L 43., 1997.2.14., 1. o.).
 (3) A Bizottság (EU) 2017/2470 végrehajtási rendelete (2017. december 20.) az új élelmiszerek uniós jegyzékének az új élelmiszerekről szóló (EU) 2015/2283 európai parlamenti és tanácsi rendelet alapján történő megállapításáról (HL L 351., 2017.12.30., 72. o.).
 (4) A Bizottság (EU) 2018/1023 végrehajtási rendelete (2018. július 23.) az új élelmiszerek uniós jegyzékének megállapításáról szóló (EU) 2017/2470 végrehajtási rendelet helyesbítéséről (HL L 187., 2018.7.24., 1. o.).
 MELLÉKLET
 Az (EU) 2017/2470 végrehajtási rendelet mellékletében szereplő 2. táblázatban (Specifikációk) a Schizochytrium sp. (T18) olajra vonatkozó bejegyzés helyébe a következő szöveg lép:
 Engedélyezett új élelmiszer
 Specifikációk
 „Schizochytrium
 sp. (T18) olaj
 Savszám: ≤ 0,8 mg KOH/g
 Peroxidszám (PV): ≤ 5,0 meq/kg olaj
 Nedvesség- és illóanyag-tartalom: ≤ 0,05 %
 El nem szappanosítható rész: ≤ 3,5 %
 Transzzsírsavak: ≤ 2,0 %
 Szabad zsírsavak: ≤ 0,4 %
 DHA-tartalom: ≥ 35 %”


type: other

text:
A 11 S 2761/09 : vom 21.01.2018 ()
 Afghanistan, Antrag auf Zulassung der Berufung, Bundesamt für Migration und Flüchtlinge, Grundsätzliche Bedeutung, Darlegungserfordernis, extreme Gefahrenlage, Beweismittel, Parteivorbringen, Grundsatz der freien Beweiswürdigung, Verfahrensfehler, Beweislast
 AufenthG § 60 Abs. 7 S. 1, VwGO § 108 Abs. 1 S. 1, AsylVfG § 78 Abs. 4 S. 4
 [...] Die grundsätzliche Bedeutung der aufgeworfenen Frage, ob bei Beantragung eines Abschiebungsverbots nach § 60 Abs. 7 Satz 1 AufenthG, das auf einer aus einer Allgemeingefahr fließenden extremen Gefährdung des Antragstellers beruht, von diesem die entsprechenden anspruchserheblichen Faktoren nicht nur glaubhaft oder plausibel zu machen oder gar nur schlüssig darzulegen sind, sondern insofern förmlich Nachweis durch die im Prozessrecht üblichen Beweismittel zu erbringen ist, wird nicht hinreichend dargelegt. Ein Klärungsbedarf wird nicht aufgezeigt. Die aufgeworfene Frage lässt sich ohne weiteres aus dem Gesetz beantworten: Nach § 108 Abs. 1 Satz 1 VwGO entscheidet das Gericht nach seiner freien, aus dem Gesamtergebnis des Verfahrens gewonnenen Überzeugung (sog. Überzeugungsgrundsatz). Das Gericht ist bei der Würdigung und Abwägung aller für die Feststellung des für seine Entscheidung maßgeblichen Sachverhalts erheblichen Tatsachen - nicht nur der Ergebnisse einer etwaigen förmlichen Beweisaufnahme gemäß § 98 VwGO, sondern auch des Inhalts der Akten, des Vortrags der Beteiligten, eingeholter Auskünfte, gerichtskundiger Tatsachen usw. - frei, d.h. nur an die innere Überzeugungskraft der in Betracht kommenden Gesichtspunkte und Argumente und an die Denkgesetze, anerkannten Erfahrungssätze und Auslegungsgrundsätze gebunden, nicht dagegen an starre Beweisregeln (BVerwG, Urt. v. 02.02.1984 - 6 C 134.81 - BVerwGE 68, 339; Kopp/Schenke, VwGO, 16. Aufl., § 108 Rn. 4 m.w.N.). Das Gericht kann nach dem Grundsatz der freien Beweiswürdigung je nach den Umständen des Falles seine Überzeugung auch aus dem bloßen Parteivorbringen gewinnen. Insbesondere kann es bei Fehlen anderer Beweismittel seine Entscheidung dann auf den Tatsachenvortrag der Beteiligten allein stützen, wenn und soweit dieser überzeugend erscheint und nicht durch anderweitiges Parteivorbringen schlüssig in Frage gestellt wird (Kopp/Schenke, a.a.O. m.w.N.). Von diesen Grundsätzen ist das Verwaltungsgericht ersichtlich auch ausgegangen, so dass auch kein Verfahrensfehler vorliegt. Für eine Beweislastentscheidung zu Lasten des Klägers, wie sie im Zulassungsantrag gefordert wird, wäre nur dann Raum, wenn das Gericht sich keine Überzeugung vom maßgeblichen Sachverhalt hätte verschaffen können. Eine derartige "non liquet"-Situation liegt hier gerade nicht vor. [...]


type: wikipedia

text:
30. januar je 30. dan leta v gregorijanskem koledarju. Ostaja še 335 dni (336 v prestopnih letih).
 Dogodki
 1018 - sklenitev Budišinskega miru, ki zaključi nemško-poljsko vojno (1002-18) med rimsko-nemškim cesarjem Henrikom II. in poljskim vojvodo Boleslavom Hrabrim
 1918 - na sestanku z delagacijo jugoslovanskega kluba avstrijski kancler Ernst Seidler ponudi postopno reševanje južnoslovanskega vprašanja na podlagi majniške deklaracije. Delegacija ga zavrne z besedami Vse ali nič!
 1933 - nemški predsednik von Hindenburg imenuje Adolfa Hitlerja za nemškega kanclerja
 1941 - Tajska in Indokina skleneta premirje
 1943 - Vichyjska Francija ustanovi Milico
 1945 - zadnji radijski govor Adolfa Hitlerja
 1953 - sprejet ustavni zakon o temeljih družbene in politične ureditve v LR Sloveniji
 1959 - MS Hans Hedtoft zadane v ledeno goro in se potopi.
 1968 - Severni Vietnam in južnovietnamska osvobodilna fronta pričneta odločilno ofenzivo Tet
 1969 - skupina The Beatles priredi na strehi svojega londonskega studia Apple Corps svoj zadnji skupni koncert
 1972 - »krvava nedelja« - britanska vojska ubije 14 demonstrantov v Bogsidu, predelu severnoirskega mesta Londonderry
 Rojstva
 1621 - György Rákóczi II., transilvanski knez († 1660)
 1687 - Johann Balthasar Neumann, nemški arhitekt († 1753)
 1720 - Bernardo Belloto, italijanski slikar († 1780)
 1736 - James Watt, škotski izumitelj, inženir in kemik († 1819)
 1781 - Louis-Charles-Adélaïde Chamisso de Boncourt - Adelbert von Chamisso, francosko-nemški pisatelj († 1838)
 1838 - Jakob Missia, slovenski kardinal († 1902)
 1841 - Samuel Loyd, ameriški problemist, ugankar, razvedrilni matematik († 1911)
 1846 - Francis Herbert Bradley, britanski filozof († 1924)
 1848 - Ferdinand Ritter von Mannlicher, avstrijski izdelovalec orožja († 1904)
 1859 - Edward Martyn, irski dramatik († 1923)
 1882 - Franklin Delano Roosevelt, ameriški predsednik († 1945)
 1905 - Božo Vodušek, slovenski pesnik, esejist, prevajalec († 1978)
 1927 - Sven Olof Joachim Palme, švedski predsednik vlade († 1986)
 1929 - Boštjan Hladnik, slovenski filmski režiser († 2006)
 1930 - Eugene Alden »Gene« Hackman, ameriški filmski igralec
 1950 - Andrej Andrejevič Bolibruh, ruski matematik († 2003)
 1962 - Jonas Žnidaršič, slovenski igralec, televizijski in radijski voditelj
 Abdulah II., jordanski kralj
 1968 - Filip VI., španski kralj
 1985 - Richie Porte, avstralski kolesar
 Smrti
 1181 - cesar Takakura, 80. japonski cesar (* 1161)
 1230 - Pelagij Galvani, španski papeški legat, križar (* 1165)
 1344 - William Montagu, angleški plemič, 1. grof Salisbury, kralj otoka Man (* 1301)
 1384 - Ludvik II., flandrijski grof (* 1330)
 1574 - Damião de Góis, portugalski humanist (* 1502)
 1629 - Carlo Maderno, italijanski arhitekt (* 1556)
 1649 - Karel I., angleški kralj (* 1600)
 1889 - Rudolf Habsburški, prestolonaslednik Avstro-Ogrske (* 1858)
 1897 - Niši Amane, japonski politik in filozof (* 1829)
 1945 - Gottlieb Haberlandt, avstrijski botanik (* 1854)
 1948 - Mohandás Karamčand »Mahatma« Gándhi, indijski politik, voditelj (* 1869)
 Orville Wright, ameriški letalec (* 1871)
 Martin Wutte, avstrijski nacionalistični zgodovinar (* 1876)
 1951 - Ferdinand Porsche, nemški konstruktor avtomobilov (* 1875)
 1958 - Ernst Heinrch Heinkel, nemški letalski konstruktor (* 1888)
 1960 - Ivan Pregelj, slovenski pisatelj (* 1883)
 1963 - Francis Jean Marcel Poulenc, francoski skladatelj (* 1899)
 1969 - Dominique Pire, belgijski dominikanski redovnik, nobelovec, humanitarec, (* 1910)
 1983 - Alan Gordon Cunningham, britanski general, politik (* 1887)
 1991 - John Bardeen, ameriški fizik, nobelovec 1956, 1972 (* 1908)
 2005 - Karmen Orel, slovenska šahistka (* 1984)
 2006 - Emilijan Cevc, slovenski umetnostni zgodovinar (* 1920)
 Prazniki in obredi
 Goduje
 sveta Martina
 sveta Jacinta Marescotti
 sveta Marija Ward
 130


text:
 27.9.2008
 RO
 Jurnalul Oficial al Uniunii Europene
 C 247/22
 Recurs introdus la 1 august 2008 de Kurt-Wolfgang Braun-Neumann împotriva Ordonanței pronunțate la 23 mai 2008 de Tribunalul Funcției Publice în cauza F-79/07, Braun-Neumann/Parlamentul European
 (Cauza T-306/08 P)
 (2008/C 247/43)
 Limba de procedură: germana
 Părțile
 Recurent: Kurt-Wolfgang Braun-Neumann (Lohr am Main, Germania) (reprezentant: P. Ames, Rechtsanwalt)
 Cealaltă parte în proces: Parlamentul European
 Concluziile recurentului
 —
 anularea Ordonanței pronunțate la 23 mai 2008 de Tribunalul Funcției Publice a Uniunii Europene în cauza F-79/07;
 —
 soluționarea litigiului, admiterea acțiunii recurentului precum și obligarea în mod corespunzător a Parlamentului European la plata retroactivă începând cu 1 august 2004 a restului de jumătate de pensie de urmaș după doamna Mandt în valoare de 1 670,84 euro pe lună plus dobânzi corespunzător ratei dobânzii pentru operațiunile de refinanțare marginală a Băncii Centrale Europene, majorate cu 3 %;
 —
 în subsidiar, trimiterea cauzei spre soluționare la Tribunalul Funcției Publice a Uniunii Europene.
 Motivele și principalele argumente
 Recursul este îndreptat împotriva Ordonanței pronunțate la 23 mai 2008 de Tribunalul Funcției Publice în cauza F-79/07, Braun-Neumann/Parlamentul European, prin care acțiunea recurentului a fost respinsă ca inadmisibilă.
 Recurentul invocă în susținerea recursului său faptul că Tribunalul Funcției Publice a comis erori de drept în interpretarea articolului 90 alineatul (2) din Statutul Funcționarilor Comunităților Europene, întrucât interpretarea efectuată de acesta încalcă principii generale ale dreptului comunitar. În opinia recurentului, interpretarea dată de respectiva instanță unei scrisori drept act cauzator de prejudiciu ar fi eronată. În continuare, principiul securității juridice ar fi respectat numai dacă lipsa informării cu privire la căile de atac disponibile ar fi considerată drept prejudiciabilă, în condițiile în care în rest drepturile justițiabilului erau compromise. În sfârșit, interpretarea efectuată de instanța respectivă ar fi neproporțională în privința consecințelor pentru recurent.


text:
 20.11.2004
 CS
 Úřední věstník Evropské unie
 C 284/22
 Žaloba podaná dne 30. srpna 2004 The British Aggregates Association Limited, Healy Bros. Limited a DK Trotter & Sons Limited proti Komisi Evropských společenství
 (Věc T-359/04)
 (2004/C 284/45)
 Jednací jazyk: angličtina
 Soudu prvního stupně Evropských společenství byla předložena dne 30. srpna 2004 žaloba podaná proti Komisi Evropských společenství The British Aggregates Association Limited, se sídlem v Lanark (Spojené království), Healy Bros. Limited, se sídlem v Middleton, County Cork (Irsko) a DK Trotter & Sons, se sídlem v Manorhamilton, County Leitrim (Irsko), zastoupenými C. Pounceym, advokátem, a L. Van Den Hendem, právníkem.
 Žalobkyně navrhuje, aby Soud:
 —
 zrušil rozhodnutí Komise K(2004) 1614 konečné ze dne 7. května 2004„State Aid N 2/2004 UK/Aggregates Levy“;
 —
 uložil Komisi náhradu nákladů řízení.
 Žalobní důvody a hlavní argumenty
 Spojené království zavedlo v roce 2002 Aggregates Levy (dávku z kameniva), poplatek na ochranu životního prostředí z některého kameniva. Rozhodnutím z téhož roku Komise dospěla k závěru, že ustanovení Aggregates Levy nepředstavují státní podporu. Žalobkyně zpochybňuje toto rozhodnutí v souvislosti s jinou věcí projednávanou před Soudem prvního stupně (1), přičemž tvrdí, že Aggregates Levy má nepříznivý vliv na soutěžní postavení jeho členů.
 Dne 5. ledna 2004 uvědomilo Spojené království Komisi o novém režimu úlev od Aggregates Levy pro Severní Irsko. Napadeným rozhodnutím Komise prohlásila nový režim za slučitelný se společným trhem s tím, že zamítla stížnost žalobkyně proti tomuto rozhodnutí, aniž by zahájila formální vyšetřovací řízení.
 Žalobkyně na podporu své žaloby v první řadě uvádí, že dotyčný režim porušuje články 23 a 90 ES, a nemohl tedy být prohlášen za slučitelný se společným trhem. Žalobkyně dále tvrdí, že Komise porušila své vlastní obecné zásady na ochranu životního prostředí (2) tím, že se v tomto ohledu dopustila zjevně nesprávného posouzení, a to: považovala 20 % poměr dávky splatné společnostmi způsobilými pro režim úlev za značný; nesprávně se domnívala, že o novém režimu úlev bylo rozhodnuto, když Aggregate Levy byla přijata, a nesprávně shledala, že tato dávka bude mít značný pozitivní dopad na ochranu životního prostředí.
 Žalobkyně rovněž uvádí, že Komise neuvedla v napadeném rozhodnutí důvody, jak požaduje článek 253 ES, porušila svou povinnost zahájit formální vyšetřovací řízení a porušila své procesní povinnosti během předběžného šetření.
 (1) Věc T-210/02, zveřejněná v Úř. věst. C 219, 14.9.2002, s. 23.
 (2) Obecné pokyny Společenství o státních podporách na ochranu životního prostředí, Úř. věst. C 37, 3.2.2001, s. 3-15.


text:
 Avis juridique important
 |
 21987A0616(01)
 Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Republic of Argentina on trade in textile products - Protocol A - Protocol B - Protocol C - Protocol D - Agreed Minutes - Exchange of notes
 Official Journal L 156 , 16/06/1987 P. 0002 - 0038 L040 13/02/1991 P.0002
 AGREEMENT Between the European Economic Community and the Republic of Argentina on trade in textile products Done at Brussels on 30 September 1986THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,of the one part, andTHE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARGENTINAof the other part,DESIRING to promote, with a view to permanent cooperation and in conditions providing every security for trade, the orderly and equitable development of trade in textile products between the European Economic Community (hereinafter referred to as 'the Community') and the Republic of Argentina ('hereinafter Argentina').RESOLVED to take the fullest possible account of the serious economic and social problems at present affecting the textile industry in both importing and exporting countries, and in particular, to eliminate real risks of market disruption on the market of the Community and real risks of disruption to the textile trade of Argentina.HAVING REGARD to the Arrangement regarding International Trade in Textiles (hereinafter referred to as 'the Geneva Arrangement'), and in particular Article 4 thereof; and to the conditions set out in the Protocol extending the Arrangement.HAVE DECIDED to conclude this Agreement and to this end have designated as their Plenipotentiaries:THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES:THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARGENTINA:WHO HAVE AGREED AS FOLLOWS:SECTION ITrade arrangementsArticle 11. The Parties recognize and confirm that, subject to the provisions of this Agreement and without prejudice to their rights and obligations under the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, the conduct of their mutual trade in textile products shall be governed by the provisions of the Geneva Arrangement.2. In respect of the products covered by this Agreement, the Community undertakes not to introduce quantitative restrictions under Article XIX of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade or Article 3 of the Geneva Arrangement.3. Measures having equivalent effect to quantitative restrictions on the importation into the Community of the products covered by this Agreement shall be prohibited.Article 21. This Agreement shall apply to trade in textile products of cotton, wool and man-made fibres originating in Argentina which are listed in Annex I.2. The classification of the products covered by this Agreement is based on the Nomenclature of the Common Customs Tariff and on the Nomenclature of Goods for the External Trade Statistics of the Community and the Statistics of Trade between Member States (NIMEXE).From the entry into force of the International Convention on the Harmonised Commodity Description and Coding System (HS) this classification will be based on the Harmonized System and on the Community nomenclatures derived from that system.3. The origin of the products covered by this Agreement shall be determined in accordance with the rules in force in the Community.Any amendment to these rules of origin shall be communicated to Argentina and shall not have the effect of reducing any quantitative limit established in Annex II.The procedures for control of the origin of the products referred to above are laid down in Protocol A.Article 3Argentina agrees for each Agreement year to restrain its exports to the Community of the products described in Annex II to the limits set out therein.Exports of textile products set out in Annex II shall be subject to a double-checking system specified in Protocol A.Article 4Argentina and the Community recognize the special and differential character of re-imports of textile products into the Community after processing in Argentina.Such re-imports may be agreed outside the quantitative limits established under this Agreement provided that they are effected in accordance with the regulations on economic outward processing in force in the Community.Article 5Exports of cottage industry fabrics woven on hand- or foot-operated looms, garments or other articles obtained manually from such fabrics and traditional folklore handicraft products shall not be subject to quantitative limits, provided that these products meet the conditions laid down in Protocol B.Article 61. Imports into the Community of textile products covered by this Agreement shall not be subject to the quantitative limits established in Annex II, provided that they are declared to be for re-export outside the Community in the same state or after processing, within the framework of the administrative system of control which exists within the Community.However, the release for home use of products imported under the conditions referred to above shall be subject to the production of an export licence issued by the Argentine authorities, and to proof of origin in accordance with the provisions of Protocol A.2. Where the Community authorities have evidence that imports of textile products have been set off against a quantitative limit established under this Agreement, but that the products have subsequently been re-exported outside the Community, the authorities concerned shall inform the Argentine authorities within four weeks of the quantities involved and authorize imports of identical quantities of the same products, which shall not be set off against the quantitative limit established under this Agreement for the current or the following year.Article 71. In any Agreement year advance use of a portion of the quantitative limit established for the following Agreement year is authorized for each category of products up to 5 % of the quantitative limit for the current Agreement year.Amounts delivered in advance shall be deducted from the corresponding quantitative limits established for the following Agreement year.2. Carryover to the corresponding quantitative limit for the following Agreement year of the amounts not used during any Agreement year is authorized for each category of products up to 7 % of the quantitative limit for the current Agreement year.3. Transfers in respect of categories in Group I shall not be made from any category except as follows:- transfers between categories 2 and 3 and from category 1 to categories 2 and 3 may be made up to 7 % and transfers into category 1 from categories 2 and 3 may be made up to 4 % of the quantitative limit for the category to which the transfer is made,- transfers between categories 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 may be made up to 7 % of the quantitative limit for the category to which the transfer is made.Transfers into any category in Groups II and III may be made from any category or categories in Groups I, II and III up to 7 % of the quantitative limit for the category to which the transfer is made.4. The table of equivalence applicable to the transfers referred to above is given in Annex I to this Agreement.5. The increase in any category of products resulting from the cumulative application of the provisions in paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 above during an Agreement year shall not exceed 17 %.6. Prior notification shall be given by the authorities of Argentina in the event of recourse to the provisions of paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 above.Article 81. Exports of textile products not listed in Annex II to this Agreement may be made subject to quantitative limits by Argentina on the conditions laid down in the following paragraphs.2. Where the Community finds, under the system of administrative control set up, that the level of imports of products in a given category not listed in Annex II originating in Argentina exceeds, in relation to the preceding year's total imports into the Community from all sources of products in that category, the following rates:- 1 % for categories of products in Group I,- 5 % for categories of products in Group II,- 10 % for categories of products in Group III.It may request the opening of consultations in accordance with the procedure described in Article 16 of this Agreement, with a view to reaching agreement on an appropriate restraint level for the products in such category.The Community shall authorize the importation of products of the said category shipped from Argentina before the date on which the request for consultations was submitted.3. Pending a mutually satisfactory solution, Argentina undertakes to limit exports of the products in the category concerned to the Community or to the regions of the Community market specified by the Community for a provisional period of three months from the date on which the request for consultations is made. Such provisional limit shall be established at 25 % of the level of imports reached during the calendar year preceding that in which imports exceeded the level resulting from the application of the formula set out in paragraph 2, and gave rise to the request for consultation or 25 % of the level resulting from the application of the formula set out in paragraph 2, whichever is the higher.4. Should the Parties be unable in the course of consultations to reach a satisfactory solution within the period specified in Article 16 of the Agreement, the Community shall have the right to introduce a definitive quantitative limit at an annual level not lower than the level resulting from the application of the formula set out in paragraph 2, or 106 % of the level of imports reached during the calendar year preceding that in which imports exceeded the level resulting from the application of the formula set out in paragraph 2 and gave rise to the request for consultations whichever is the higher.The annual level so fixed shall be revised upwards after consultations in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 16, with a view to fulfilling the conditions set out in paragraph 2, should the trend of total imports into the Community of the product in question make this necessary.5. The limits introduced under paragraph 2 or paragraph 4 may in no case be lower than the level of imports of products in that category originating in Argentina in 1985.6. Quantitative limits may also be established by the Community on a regional basis in accordance with the provisions of Protocol C.7. The annual growth rate for the quantitative limits introduced under this Article shall be determined in accordance with the provisions of Protocol D.8. The provisions of this Article shall not apply where the percentages specified in paragraph 2 have been reached as a result of fall in total imports into the Community, and not as a result of an increase in exports or products originating in Argentina.9. In the event of the provisions of paragraph 2, 3 or 4 being applied, Argentina undertakes to issue export licencesfor products covered by contracts concluded before the introduction of the quantitative limit, up to the volume of the quantitative limit fixed.10. Up to the date of communication of the statistics referred to in Article 9 (7), the provisions of paragraph 2 of this Article shall apply on the basis of the annual statistics previously communicated by the Community.11. The provisions of this Agreement which concern exports of products subject to the quantitative limits established in Annex II shall also apply to products for which quantitative limits are introduced under this Article.Article 91. Argentina shall supply the Community with precise statistical information on all export certificates issued by the Argentine authorities for all categories of textile products subject to the quantitative limits established under this Agreement as well as on all certificates issued by the Argentine authorities for all products referred to in Article 5 and subject to the provisions of Protocol B.The Community shall likewise transmit to the Argentine authorities precise statistical information on import authorizations or documents issued by the Community authorities in respect of export licences and certificates issued by Argentina.2. The information referred to in paragraph 1 shall, for all categories of products, be forwarded before the end of the second month following the quarter to which the statistics relate.3. Argentina also undertakes to supply the Community wherever possible with available statistical information on all textile exports by country of destination.4. The Community shall forward to the Argentine authorities import statistics for all products covered by the system of administrative control referred to in Article 8 (2) and for products covered by Article 6 (1).5. The information referred to in paragraph 3 shall, for all categories of products, be transmitted before the end of the third month following the quarter to which the statistics relate.6. Should it be found on analysis of the information exchanged that there are significant discrepancies between the returns for exports and those for imports, consultations may be initiated in accordance with the procedure specified in Article 16.7. For the purpose of applying the provisions of Article 7, the Community undertakes to provide the Argentine authorities before 15 April of each year with the preceding year's statistics on imports of all textile products covered by this Agreement, broken down by supplying country and Community Member State.Article 101. Should there be divergent opinions between Argentina and the competent Community authorities at the point of entry into the Community on the classification of products covered by the present Agreement, classification shall provisionally be based on indications provided by the Community, pending consultations in accordance with Article 16 with a view to reaching agreement on definitive classification of the product concerned.2. If the above provisional classification results in provisional debit against a quantitative limit for a category of products other than the category indicated on the export documents issued by the competent Argentine authorities, the Community shall inform Argentina of such provisional debit within 30 days.3. The authorities of Argentina shall be informed of any amendment to the tariff and statistical nomenclatures in force in the Community or any decision, made in accordance with the procedures in force in the Community, relating to the classification of products covered by this Agreement.Any amendment to the tariff and statistical nomenclatures in force in the Community or any decision which results in a modification of the classification of products covered by this Agreement shall not have the effect of reducing any quantitative limit established in Annex II.The procedures for the application of this paragraph are set out in Protocol A.Article 111. Argentina and the Community agree to cooperate fully in preventing the circumvention of the present Agreement by transhipment, rerouting or whatever other means.2. Where information available to the Community as a result of the investigations carried out in accordance with the procedures set out in Protocol A constitutes evidence that products of Argentine origin subject to quantitatives limits established under this Agreement have been transhipped, rerouted or otherwise imported into the Community in circumvention of this Agreement, the Community may request the opening of consultations in accordance with the procedures described in Article 16 of this Agreement, with a view to reaching agreement on an equivalent adjustment of the corresponding quantitative limits established under the Agreement.3. Pending the result of the consultations referred to in paragraph 2, Argentina shall as a precautionary measure, if so requested by the Community make the necessary arrangements to ensure that adjustments of quantitative limits liable to be agreed following the consultations referred to in paragraph 2, may be carried out for the quota year in which the request to open consultations in accordance with paragraph 2 was made, or for the following year if the quota for the current year is exhausted, where clear evidence of circumvention is provided.4. Should the parties be unable in the course of consultations to reach a satisfactory solution within the period specified in Article 16 of the Agreement, the Community shall have the right, where clear evidence of circumvention has been provided, to deduct from the quantitative limits established under this Agreement amounts equivalent to the products of Argentine origin.Article 121. Argentina shall endeavour to ensure that exports of textile products subject to quantitative limits are spaced out as evenly as possible over an Agreement year, due account being taken, in particular, of seasonal factors.2. Should there be an excessive concentration of imports on any product within a category subject to quantitative limits under this Agreement, the Community may request consultations in accordance with the procedure specified in Article 16 of this Agreement with a view to remedying this situation. Article 13Should recourse be had to the denunciation provisions of Article 18 (4), the quantitative limits established in Annex II shall be adapted on a pro rata basis. Article 141. For the purpose of the administration of this Agreement, the limits referred to in Article 3 are broken down by the Community into shares for each of its Member States.2. Portions of the quantitative limits established in Annex II not used in one Member State of the Community may be reallocated to another Member State in accordance with the procedures in force in the Community.The Community undertakes to examine with care and reply within four weeks to any request made for reallocation by Argentina. In the event of agreement on such reallocation, the flexibility provisions set out in Article 6 shall continue to be applicable to the levels of the original allocation.If, in the course of the application of this Agreement, Argentina finds that the break-down of a limit established in Annex II causes particular difficulties, it may request the opening of consultations in accordance with Article 16 with a view to reaching a mutually satisfactory solution.3. After the first of June of each year of application of the Agreement, Argentina may transfer, subject to prior notification to the Community, the unused quantities of the regional quota-shares of a Community quantitative limit, set out in Annex II, to the quota-shares of the same limit of other regions of the Community provided that the regional quota-share from which the transfer is made is utilized by less than 80 %, and up to the amount of the followingpercentages of the quota-share to which the transfer is made:- 2 %in the first year of the application of the Agreement,- 4 % in the second year of the application of the Agreement,- 8 % in the third year of the application of the Agreement,- 12 % in the fourth year of the application of the Agreement.The percentage in the fifth year of the application of the Agreement shall be determined following consultation between the Parties.4. Should it appear in any given region of the Community that additional supplies are required, the Community may, where measures taken pursuant to paragraph 1 are inadequate to cover those requirements, authorize the importation of amounts greater than those stipulated in Annex II.Article 151. Argentina and the Community undertake to refrain from discrimination in the allocation of export licences and import authorizations or documents referred to in Protocol A.2. In implementing this Agreement, the Contracting Parties shall take care to maintain the traditional commercial practices and trade flows between the Community and Argentina.3. Should either Party find that the application of this Agreement is disturbing existing commercial relations between importers in the Community and suppliers in Argentina consultations shall be started promptly, in accordance with the procedure specified in Article 16 with a view to remedying this situation.Article 161. The special consultation procedures referred to in this Agreement shall be governed by the following rules:- any request for consultations shall be notified in writing to the other Party,- the request for consultations shall be followed within a reasonable period (and in any case not later than 15 days following the notification) by a statement setting out the reasons and circumstances which, in the opinion of the requesting Party, justify the submission of such a request,- the parties shall enter into consultations within one month at the latest of notification of the request, with a view to reaching agreement or a mutually acceptable conclusion within one further month at the latest.2. The Community may request consultations in accordance with paragraph 1 when it ascertains that during a particular year of application of the Agreement difficulties arise in the Community or one of its regions from a sharp and substantial increase, by comparison to the preceding year, in imports of a given category of Group I subject to the quantitative limits set out in Annex II.3. If necessary, at the request of either of the Parties and in conformity with the provisions of the Geneva Arrangement, consultations shall be held on any problems arising from the application of this Agreement. Any consultations held under this Article shall be approached by both Parties in a spirit of cooperation and with a desire to reconcile the difference between them.Article 17This Agreement shall apply, on the one hand, to the territories within which the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community is applied and under the conditions laid down in that Treaty and, on the other hand, to the territory of Argentina.Article 181. This Agreement shall enter into force on the first day of the month following the date on which the Contracting Parties notify each other of the completion of the procedures necessary for this purpose. It shall be applicable until 31 December 1991.2. This Agreement shall apply with effect from 1 January 1987.3. Either party may at any time propose modifications to the Agreement.4. Either Party may at any time denounce this Agreement provided that at least 60 days notice is given. In that event, the Agreement shall come to an end on the expiry of the period of notice.5. The Annexes, Protocols and Agreed Minutes to this Agreement shall form an integral part thereof.Article 19This Agreement shall be drawn up in two copies in the Danish, Dutch, English, French, German, Greek, Italian, Portuguese and Spanish languages, each of these texts being equally authentic.ANNEX I LIST OF PRODUCTS 1. When the constitutive material of the products of categories 1 to 114 is not specifically mentioned these products are to be taken to be made exclusively of wool or of fine animal hair, of cotton or of man-made fibres.2. Garments which are not recognizable as being garments for men or boys or as garments for women or girls are classified with the latter.3. Where the expression 'babies' garments' is used, this is meant also to cover girls' garments up to and including commercial size 86.>TABLE>>TABLE>>TABLE>>TABLE>>TABLE>>TABLE>ANNEX II For practical reasons the product descriptions used Annex I are given in the present Annex in abbreviated form >TABLE>PROTOCOL A TITLE ICLASSIFICATIONArticle 11. The competent authorities of the Community undertake to inform Argentina of any changes in the tariff and statistical nomenclatures before the date of their entry into effect in the Community.2. The competent authorities of the Community undertake to inform Argentina of any decisions relating to the classification of products subject to the Agreement within one month of their adoption at the latest. Such communication shall include:(a) a description of the products concerned;(b) the relevant category and the related tariff and statistical references;(c) the reasons which have led to the decision.3. Where a decision on classification results in a change of classification practice or a change of category of any product subject to the Agreement, the competent authorities of the Community shall provide 30 day's notice, from the date of the Community's communication, before the decision is put into effect. Products shipped before the date of application of the decision shall remain subject to the earlier classification practice, provided that the goods in question are presented for importation into the Community within 60 days of that date.4. Where a Community decision on classification resulting in a change of classification practice or a change of categorization of any product subject to the Agreement affects a category subject to restraint, the two Parties agree to enter into consultations in accordance with the procedures described in Article 16 (1) of the Agreement with a view to honouring the obligation under the second subparagraph of Article 10 (3) of the Agreement.TITLE IIORIGINArticle 21. Products originating in Argentina for export to the Community in accordance with the arrangements established by this Agreement shall be accompanied by a certificate of Argentina origin conforming to the model annexed to this Protocol.2. The certificate of origin shall be issued by the competent governmental authorities of Argentina if the products in question can be considered products originatingin that country within the meaning of the relevant rules in force in the Community.3. However, the products in Group III may be imported into the Community in accordance with the arrangements established by this Agreement on production of a declaration by the exporter on the invoice or other commercial document relating to the products to the effect that the products in question originate in Argentina within the meaning of the relevant rules in force in the Community.4. The certificate of origin referred to in paragraph 1 shall not be required for import of goods covered by a certificate of origin Form A or Form APR completed in accordance with the relevant Community rules in order to qualify for generalized tariff preferences.Article 3The certificate of origin shall be issued only on application having been made in writing by the exporter or, under the exporter's responsibility, by his authorized representative. The competent governmental authorties of Argentina shall ensure that the certificate of origin is properly completed and for this purpose they shall call for any necessary documentary evidence or carry out any check which they consider appropriate.Article 4Where different criteria for determining origin are laid down for products falling within the same category, certificates or declarations of origin shall contain a sufficiently detailed description of the goods to enable the criterion to be determined on the basis of which the certificate was issued or the declaration drawn up.Article 5The discovery of slight discrepancies between the statements made in the certificate of origin and those made in the documents produced to the customs office for the purpose of carrying out the formalities for importing the product shall not ipso facto cast doubt upon the statements in the certificate.TITLE IIIDOUBLE CHECKING SYSTEM FOR CATEGORIES OF PRODUCTS WITH QUANTITATIVE LIMITSSection IExportationArticle 6The competent authorities of Argentina shall issue an export licence in respect of all consignments from Argentina oftextile products referred to in Annex II, up to the relevant quantitative limits as may be modified by Articles 7, 13 and 14 of the Agreement and of textile products subject to any definitive or provisional quantitative limits established as a result of the application of Article 8 of the Agreement.Article 71. The export licence shall conform to the model annexed to this Protocol. It must certify inter alia that the quantity of the product in question has been set off against the quantitative limit prescribed for the category of the product in question.2. Each export licence shall only cover one of the categories of products listed in Annex II of this Agreement. It may be used for one or more consignments of the products in question.Article 8The competent Community authorities must be notified forthwith of the withdrawal or alteration of any export licence already issued.Article 91. Exports shall be set off against the quantitative limits established for the year in which shipment of the goods has been effected, even if the export certificate is issued after such shipment.2. For the purpose of applying paragraph 1, shipment of the goods is considered to have taken place on the date of their loading on to the exporting aircraft, vehicle or vessel.Article 10The presentation of an export licence, in application of Article 11, shall be effected not later than 31 March of the year following that in which the goods covered by the licence have been shipped.Section IIImportationArticle 11Importation into the Community of textile products subject to quantitative limits shall be subject to the presentation of an import authorization or document.Article 121. The competent Community authorities shall issue such import authorization or document automatically within fiveworking days of the presentation by the importer of the original of the corresponding export licence.The import authorization or document shall be valid for six months.2. The competent Community authorities shall cancel the already issued import authorization or document if the corresponding export licence has been withdrawn.However, if the competent Community authorities have not been notified about the withdrawal or cancellation of the export licence until after the products have been imported into the Community, the quantities involved shall be set off against the quantitative limit for the category and the quota year in question.Article 131. If the competent Community authorities find that the total quantities covered by export certificates issued by Argentina for a particular category in any Agreement year exceed the quantitative limit established in Annex II for that category, as may be modified by Articles 7, 13 and 14 of the Agreement, or any definitive or provisional limit established under Article 8 of the Agreement, the said authorities may suspend the further issue of import authorizations or documents. In this event, the competent Community authorities shall immediately inform the authorities of Argentina and the special consultation procedure set out in Article 16 of the Agreement shall be initiated forthwith.2. Exports of Argentine origin not covered by Argentine export licences issued in accordance with the provisions of this Protocol may be refused the issue of import authorizations or documents by the competent Community authorities.However, if the import of such products is allowed into the Community by the competent Community authorities, the quantities involved shall not be set off against the appropriate quantitative limits set out in Annex II or established as a result of the application of Article 7 of the Agreement, without the express agreement of Argentina save as provided for in Article 11 of the Agreement.TITLE IVFORM AND PRODUCTION OF EXPORT CERTIFICATES AND CERTIFICATES OF ORIGIN, AND COMMON PROVISIONSArticle 141. The export licence and the certificate of origin may comprise additional copies duly indicated as such. They shall be made out in English or French. If they are completed by hand, entries must be in ink and in block capitals.These documents shall measure 210 × 297 mm. The paper used must be white writing paper, sized, not containing mechanical pulp and weighing not less than 25 g/m$. Eachpart shall have a printed guilloche-pattern background making any falsification by mechanical or chemical means apparent to the eye.If the documents have several copies only the top copy which is the original shall be printed with the guilloche-pattern background. This copy shall be clearly marked as 'original' and the other copies as 'copy'. Only the original shall be accepted by the competent authorities in the Community as being valid for the purposes of export to the Community in accordance with the arrangements established by this Agreement.2. Each document shall bear a standardized serial number, whether or not printed, by which it can be identified.This number shall be composed of the following elements:- two letters identifying Argentina as follows: AR,- two letters identifying the country of destination as follows:BL = BeneluxDE = GermanyDK = DenmarkFR = FranceGB = United KingdomGR = GreeceIE = IrelandIT = ItalyES = SpainPT = Portugal- a one-digit number identifying quota year, corresponding to the last figure in year, e.g. 7 for 1987,- a two-digit number running consecutively from 01 to 99 identifying issuing office.- a five-digit number running consecutively from 00001 to 99999 allocated to the country of destination.Article 15The export licence and certificate of origin may be issued after the shipment of the products to which they relate. In such cases they shall bear either the endorsement 'délivré a posteriori' or the endorsement 'Issued retrospectively'.Article 161. In the event of theft, loss or destruction of an export licence or a certificate of origin, the exporter may apply to the competent governmental authority which issued the document for a duplicate to be made out on the basis of the export documents in his possession. The duplicate of any such certificate or licence so issued shall bear the endorsement 'duplicata'.2. The duplicate must bear the date of the original export licence or certificate of origin.TITLE VADMINISTRATIVE COOPERATIONArticle 17The Community and Argentina shall cooperate closely to implement the provisions of this Agreement. To this end, contacts and exchanges of views (including on technical matters) shall be facilitated by both Parties.Article 18In order to ensure the proper application of this Agreement, the Community and Argentina shall assist each other in checking the authenticity and accuracy of export licences and certificates of origin issued or declarations made under this Protocol.Article 19Argentina shall send the Commission of the European Communities the names and addresses of the governmental authorities competent for the issue and verification of export licences and certificates of origin together with specimens of the stamps used by these authorities. Argentina shall also notify the Commission of any change in this information.Article 201. Subsequent verification of certificates of origin or export licences shall be carried out at random, or whenever the competent Community authorities have reasonable doubt as to the authenticity of the certificate or licence or as to accuracy of the information regarding the products in question.2. In such cases the competent authorities in the Community shall return the certificate of origin or export licence or a copy thereof to the competent governmental authority in Argentina giving, where appropriate, the reasons of form or substance for an enquiry. If the invoice has been submitted, such invoice or a copy thereof shall be attached to the certificate or licence or its copy. The authorities shall also forward any information that has been obtained suggesting that the particulars given on the said certificate or licence are inaccurate.3. The provisions of paragraph 1 shall be applicable to subsequent verifications of the declarations of origin referred to in Article 2 of this Protocol.4. The results of the subsequent verifications carried out in accordance with paragraphs 1 and 2 shall be communicated to the competent authorities of the Community within three months at the latest. The information communicated shall indicate whether the disputed certificate or licence applied to the goods actually exported and whether these goods are eligible for export in accordance with the arrangements established by this Agreement. The information shall also include, at the requestof the Community, copies of all documentation necessary to determine the facts fully and in particular the true origin of the goods.Should such verifications reveal systematic irregularities in the use of declarations of origin, the Community may subject imports of the products in question to the provisions of Article 2 (1) of this Protocol.5. For the purpose of subsequent verification of certificates of origin, copies of the certificates as well as any export documents referring to them shall be kept for a period of at least three years by the competent governmental authority in Argentina.6. Recourse to the random verification procedure specified in this Article must not constitute an obstacle to the release for home use of the products in question.Article 211. Where the verification procedure referred to in Article 20 or where information available to the Community or to Argentina indicates or appears to indicate that the provisions of this Agreement are being contravened, both Parties shall cooperate closely and with appropriate urgency to prevent such contravention.2. To this end Argentina shall on its own initiative or at the request of the Community, carry out appropriateenquiries or arrange for such enquiries to be carried out concerning operations which are, or appear to the Community to be in contravention of this Agreement. Argentina shall communicate the results of these enquiries to the Community together with any other pertinent information enabling the true origin of the goods to be determined.3. By agreement between the competent Community authorities and the competent Argentine authorities, officials designated by the Community may be present at the enquiries referred to above.4. Pursuant to the cooperation referred to in paragraph 1, Argentina and the Community shall exchange any information considered by either party to be of use in preventing the contravention of the provisions of this Agreement. These exchanges may include information on textile production in Argentina and on trade in textile products of a kind covered by this Agreement between Argentina and other countries, particularly where the Community has reasonable grounds to consider that the products in question may be in transit across the territory of Argentina and prior to their importation into the Community. This information shall include at the request of the Community copies of all relevant documentation.5. Where it is established that the provisions of this Agreement have been contravened, Argentina and the Community may agree to take such measures as are necessary to prevent a recurrence of such contravention.Annex to Protocol A, Article 2(1) >TABLE>Annex to Protocol A, Article 7(1) >TABLE>PROTOCOL B 1. The exemption provided for in Article 5 of the Agreement in respect of cottage industry products shall apply only to the following products:(a) fabrics woven on hand- or foot-operated looms, being fabrics of a kind traditionally made in the cottage industry of Argentina;(b) garments or other textile articles of a kind traditionally made in the cottage industry of Argentina obtained manually from the fabrics referred to above and sewn exclusively by hand without the aid of any machine;(c) traditional folklore textile products of Argentina made by hand in the cottage industry of Argentina as defined in a list to be agreed between both Parties and annexed to this Protocol.Exemption shall be granted only for products accompanied by a certificate issued by the competent Argentine authorities in accordance with the specimen annexed to this Protocol. Such certificates shall state the ground on which exemption is based and shall be accepted by the competent Community authorities provided that they are satisfied that the products concerned conform to the conditions set out in this Protocol. Certificates covering the products referred to in subparagraph (c) above shall bear a conspicuous stamp: 'FOLKLORE'. In case of divergent opinion between Argentina and the competent Community authorities at the point of entry into the Community as to the nature of such products, consultations shall be held within one month with a view to resolving such divergences. Should imports of any of the above products reach such proportions as to cause difficulties to the Community, the two Parties shall open consultations forthwith in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 16 of the Agreement with a view to finding a quantitative solution to the problem.2. The provisions of Title IV and V of Protocol A shall apply mutatis mutandi to the products referred to in paragraph 1 of this Protocol.Annex to Protocol B >TABLE>PROTOCOL C Under Article 8 (6) of the Agreement, a quantitative limit may be fixed on a regional basis where imports of a given product into any region of the Community in relation to the amounts determined in accordance with paragraph 2 of the said Article 8 exceed the following regional percentage:Germany 25,5 %Benelux 9,5 %France 16,5 %Italy 13,5 %Denmark 2,7 %Ireland 0,8 %United Kingdom 21,0 %Greece 1,5 %Spain 7,5 %Portugal 1,5 %PROTOCOL D The annual growth rate for the quantitative limits introduced under Article 8 of the Agreement shall be determined as follows:For products in categories falling within Group I, II, III, the growth rate shall be fixed by agreement between the Parties in accordance with the consultation procedure established in Article 16 of the Agreement. Such growth rate may in no case be lower than the highest rate applied to corresponding products under bilateral agreements concluded under the Geneva Arrangement between the Community and other third countries having a level of trade equal to or comparable with that of Argentina.Agreed Minute With reference to Article 14 (3) of the Agreement on trade in textiles between the European Economic Community and the Republic of Argentina, initialled on 30 September 1986, it is agreed that the percentage of the fifth year of the application of the Agreement will be at least equal to the percentage applicable in the fourth year.Head of Delegation of theRepublic of ArgentinaHead of Delegation of theEuropean Economic CommunityExchange of Notes The Mission of the Republic of Argentina to the European Communities presents its compliments to the Directorate-General for External Relations of the Commission of the European Communities and has the honour to refer to the Agreement on trade in textile products between the Republic of Argentina and the Community initialled on 30 September 1986.The Mission wishes to inform the Directorate-General that whilst awaiting the completion of the necessary procedures for the conclusion and the coming into force of the Agreement, the Government of the Republic of Argentina is prepared to allow the provisions of the Agreement to apply provisionally from 1 January 1987 if the Community is disposed to do likewise.The Mission would be grateful if the Community would confirm its agreement to the foregoing.The Mission of the Republic of Argentina to the European Communities avails itself of this opportunity to renew to the Directorate-General for External Relations of the European Communities the assurance of its highest consideration.Exchange of Notes The Directorate-General for External Relations of the Commission of the European Communities presents its compliments to the Mission of the Republic of Argentina to the European Communities and has the honour to refer to the Note regarding the Agreement on trade in textile products between the Republic of Argentina and the Community initalled on 30 September 1986.The Directorate-General wishes to confirm that whilst awaiting the completion of the necessary procedures for the conclusion and the coming into force of the Agreement, the Community is prepared to allow the provisions of the Agreement to apply provisionally from 1 January 1987.The Directorate-General for External Relations of the Commission of the European Communities avails itself of this opportunity to renew to the Mission of the Republic of Argentina to the European Communities the assurance of its highest consideration.Information concerning the Agreement between the Community and Argentina on trade in textile products In accordance with Article 2 of the Council Decision of 11 December 1986 concerning the provisional application of the Agreement with Argentina on trade in textile products, the Commission has notified the Council of Argentina's agreement, given on 10 December 1986.


text:
Kim Yarbrough Green (nascida em 1955) é uma virologista norte-americana. Ela é chefe da seção de calicivírus no laboratório de doenças infecciosas do Instituto Nacional de Alergia e Doenças Infecciosas. Ela pesquisa norovírus em doenças humanas, prevenção de doenças e estratégias de controle.
 Educação
 Green obteve o seu Ph.D. do Centro de Ciências da Saúde da Universidade do Tennessee, no departamento de microbiologia e imunologia. A sua dissertação é intitulada Caracterização do antígeno do vírus da rubéola.
 Carreira
 Em 1986, Green ingressou no laboratório de doenças infecciosas do Instituto Nacional de Alergia e Doenças Infecciosas. Green é a chefe da seção de calicivírus.
 Ela é membro da Sociedade Americana de Virologia, da Sociedade Americana de Microbiologia e do grupo de estudos Caliciviridae do Comité Internacional de Taxonomia de Vírus.
 Pesquisa
 A pesquisa de Green tem-se concentrado no estudo de vírus associados à gastroenterite. O seu programa de pesquisa abordou o papel dos norovírus em doenças humanas, com ênfase no desenvolvimento de estratégias de prevenção e controle.
 Nascidos em 1955
 Virologistas dos Estados Unidos
 Pessoas vivas


text:
 14.3.2016
 FI
 Euroopan unionin virallinen lehti
 C 98/51
 Kanne 7.1.2016 – Awg Allgemeine Warenvertriebs v. SMHV – Takko (Southern Territory 23o48’25”S)
 (Asia T-6/16)
 (2016/C 098/66)
 Oikeudenkäyntikieli: saksa
 Asianosaiset ja muut osapuolet
 Kantaja: Awg Allgemeine Warenvertriebs GmbH (Köngen, Saksa) (edustaja: asianajaja T. Sambuc)
 Vastaaja: Sisämarkkinoiden harmonisointivirasto (tavaramerkit ja mallit) (SMHV)
 Vastapuoli valituslautakunnassa: Takko Holding GmbH (Telgte, Saksa)
 Menettely SMHV:ssa
 Riidanalaisen tavaramerkin haltija: Kantaja
 Riidanalainen tavaramerkki: Yhteisön tavaramerkiksi rekisteröity sanamerkki ”Southern Territory 23o48’25”S” – Yhteisön tavaramerkki nro 10 099 554
 SMHV:ssa käyty menettely: Mitättömyysmenettely
 Riidanalainen päätös: SMHV:n neljännen valituslautakunnan 10.11.2015 asiassa R 735/2015-4 tekemä päätös
 Vaatimukset
 Kantaja vaatii
 —
 riidanalaisen päätöksen muuttamista siten, että vaatimus yhteisön tavaramerkin nro 10 099 554, ”Southern Territory 23o48’25”S” mitättömäksi toteamisesta hylätään.
 Kanneperusteet
 —
 Asetuksen N:o 207/2009 53 artiklan 1 kohdan a alakohdan sekä 8 artiklan 1 kohdan b alakohdan rikkominen.


text:
 Udalosti
 1328 – Filip VI. bol korunovaný za francúzskeho kráľa
 1353 – v Budíne sa Anna Svídnická stala treťou manželkou Karola IV.
 1703 – cár Peter Veľký založil mesto Petrohrad
 1883 – Alexander III. bol korunovaný za ruského cára
 1895 – Oscar Wilde bol za sodomiu poslaný do väzenia
 1937 – v San Franciscu bol otvorený most Golden Gate Bridge
 1941 – potopila sa vtedajšia pýcha nemeckej flotily, bojová loď Bismarck
 1942 – Slovák Jozef Gabčík a Čech Jan Kubiš uskutočnili atentát na Heydricha
 1974 – Jacques Chirac sa stal predsedom vlády Francúzska
 1974 – pod názvom Kosmos 656 odštartoval nepilotovaný let programu Sojuz
 1999 – štart misie STS-96 raketoplánu Discovery
 2012 – Chrám Svätého Ducha v Michalovciach bol vyhlásený za baziliku minor
 2016 – pohreb Veroniky Terézie Račkovej SSpS, slovenskej misionárky v Južnom Sudáne
 Narodenia
 1623 – William Petty, anglický ekonóm, štatistik a lekár († 1687)
 1884 – Max Brod, nemecký spisovateľ († 1968)
 1891 – Claude Champagne, kanadský skladateľ († 1965)
 1897 – John Douglas Cockcroft, britský fyzik († 1967)
 1905 – František Viktor Podolay, slovenský maliar a grafik († 1958)
 1907 – Rachel Carsonová, americká biologička a aktivistka († 1964)
 1910 – Ján Gerthofer, pilot Slovenských vzdušných zbraní v druhej svetovej vojne († 1991)
 1911 – Teddy Kollek, starosta Jeruzalema a zakladateľ Jeruzalemskej nadácie († 2007)
 1922 – Christopher Lee, britský herec († 2015)
 1923 – Henry Kissinger, americký diplomat, nositeľ Nobelovej ceny za mier
 1923 – Sumner Redstone, americký mediálny magnát († 2020)
 1924 – Ladislav Chudík, slovenský herec a divadelný pedagóg († 2015)
 1925 – Karol Paluš, slovenský architekt a urbanista († 2000)
 1929 – Ľubomír Titl, slovenský architekt († 2018)
 1930 – John Barth, americký spisovateľ
 1931 – Henrieta Peťovská, prvá slovenská kameramanka
 1933 – Jozef Košnár, slovenský ekonóm, vysokoškolský pedagóg a politik († 2008)
 1939 – Alta Vášová, slovenská prozaička a scenáristka
 1939 – Don Williams, americký country hudobník, člen Grand Ole Opry († 2017)
 1943 – Luděk Sobota, český herec
 1946 – Lewis Collins, britský herec († 2013)
 1948 – Alexander Alexandrovič Volkov, sovietsky kozmonaut
 1955 – Ján Babič, slovenský politik
 1955 – Rudolf Žiak, slovenský politik
 1963 – Maria Walliserová, švajčiarska lyžiarka
 1965 – Pat Cash, austrálsky tenista
 1967 – Paul Gascoigne, anglický futbalista
 1969 – Jiří Dienstbier mladší, český politik
 1971 – Paul Bettany, britský herec
 1971 – Grant Stafford, juhoafrický tenista
 1972 – Maxim Sokolov, ruský hokejový brankár
 1975 – Jamie Oliver, britský kuchár a televízny moderátor
 1976 – Jiří Štajner, český futbalista
 1978 – Hugo Armando, americký tenista
 1978 – Erik Weissmann, slovenský hokejista
 1980 – Juraj Dovičovič, slovenský futbalista
 1980 – Rudolf Huna, slovenský hokejista
 1987 – Martina Sáblíková, česká rýchlokorčuliarka
 1990 – Chris Colfer, americký herec, spevák a spisovateľ
 1990 – Jonathan Eysseric, francúzsky tenista
 1991 – Xenija Pervaková, ruská tenistka
 Úmrtia
 735 – Beda Venerabilis, anglický polyhistor (* 672/673)
 1508 – Ludovico Sforza, milánsky vojvoda (* 1452)
 1525 – Tomáš Müntzer, nemecký teológ (* okolo 1489)
 1564 – Ján Kalvín, francúzsky náboženský reformátor (* 1509)
 1615 – Margaréta Valois, kráľovná Francúzska a Navarry (* 1553)
 1648 – Vincent Voiture, francúzsky básnik a prozaik, jeden z prvých štyroch členov Francúzskej akadémie (* 1597)
 1840 – Niccolò Paganini, taliansky husľový virtuóz a skladateľ (* 1782)
 1910 – Robert Koch, nemecký bakteriológ (* 1843)
 1987 – John Howard Northrop, americký biochemik, nositeľ Nobelovej ceny (* 1891)
 1988 – Ernst Ruska, nemecký fyzik (* 1906)
 2000 – Maurice Richard, kanadský hokejista (* 1921)
 2002 – Anastázia Miertušová, slovenská výtvarníčka (* 1927)
 2003 – Luciano Berio, taliansky skladateľ (* 1925)
 2004 – Ladislav Hecht, slovenský tenista (* 1909)
 2007 – Miroslav Šášky, slovenský novinár (* 1959)
 2008 – Franz Künstler, posledný rakúsko-uhorský veterán I. svetovej vojny (* 1900)
 2009 – Ján Drdoš, slovenský geograf, ekológ a vysokoškolský pedagóg (* 1934)
 2009 – Clive Granger, britský ekonóm, nositeľ Nobelovej ceny za ekonómiu (* 1934)
 2011 – Gil Scott-Heron, americký hudobník a básnik (* 1949)
 2012 – Friedrich Hirzebruch, nemecký matematik (* 1927)
 2012 – Zita Kabátová, česká herečka (* 1913)
 2014 – Dagfinn Aarskog, nórsky lekár – pediater, genetik a vysokoškolský pedagóg (* 1928)
 2016 – František Jakubec, český futbalista (* 1956)
 2017 – Gregg Allman, americký blues-rockový hudobník, člen The Allman Brothers Band (* 1947)
 2017 – Eduard Longauer, slovenský bežec cez prekážky (* 1949)
 2022 – Angelo Sodano, taliansky kardinál, štátny sekretár Svätej stolice vo Vatikáne a dekan kardinálskeho kolégia (* 1927)
 Referencie
 27
 ~0527


text:
 21.9.2015
 MT
 Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali tal-Unjoni Ewropea
 C 311/55
 Appell ippreżentat fl-14 ta’ Lulju 2015 miċ-Ċentru Ewropew għall-Prevenzjoni u l-Kontroll tal-Mard (ECDC) mis-sentenza mogħtija mit-Tribunal għas-Servizz Pubbliku fid-29 ta’ April 2015 fil-Kawżi magħquda F-159/12 u F-161/12, CJ vs ECDC
 (Kawża T-395/15)
 (2015/C 311/60)
 Lingwa tal-kawża: l-Ingliż
 Partijiet
 Appellant:Iċ-Ċentru Ewropew għall-Prevenzjoni u l-Kontroll tal-Mard (ECDC) (rappreżentanti: J. Mannheim u A. Daume, aġenti, D. Waelbroeck u A. Duron, avukati)
 Partijiet oħra fil-proċedura: CJ (Agios Stefanos, il-Greċja)
 Talbiet
 —
 tannulla s-sentenza tat-Tribunal għas-Servizz Pubbliku tad-29/04/2015 fil-Kawżi magħquda F-159/12 u F-161/12, fir-rigward tal-motiv ikkontestat fl-appell u
 —
 tikkundanna lill-appellat għall-ispejjeż.
 Aggravji u argumenti prinċipali
 Insostenn tal-appell tiegħu, l-appellant jinvoka żewġ aggravji.
 1.
 L-ewwel aggravju, ibbażat fuq żball ta’ liġi min-naħa tat-Tribunal għas-Servizz Pubbliku fir-rigward tal-portata tad-dritt għal smigħ.
 —
 Mingħajr ma bbaża fuq kwalunkwe ġurisprudenza jew mingħajr ma pprovda raġunament speċifiku, it-Tribunal għas-Servizz Pubbliku adotta interpretazzjoni estensiva tal-portata tad-dritt għal smigħ, applikabbli mhux biss għal allegazzjonijiet magħmula fir-rigward ta’ individwu, iżda wkoll għal konsegwenzi li jirriżultaw mill-aġir ta’ dak l-individwu. Minbarra dan, l-approċċ meħud mit-Tribunal tas-Servizz Pubbliku fir-rigward tal-portata tad-dritt għal smigh ma jaqbilx mal-konklużjonijiet tiegħu stess fis-sentenza appellata.
 2.
 It-tieni aggravju, ibbażat fuq żball ta’ liġi min-naħa tat-Tribunal għas-Servizz Pubbliku fil-konklużjoni li wasal għaliha wara l-evalwazzjoni dwar jekk fl-assenza ta’ din l-irregolarità allegata, il-proċedura setgħetx wasslet għal riżultat differenti.
 —
 It-Tribunal għas-Servizz Pubbliku, peress li li rrikonoxxa li r-relazzjoni ta fiduċja bejn l-appellat u l-appellanti kienet tkissret irrimedjabbilment, l-assenza tal-irregolarità allegata ma kinitx twassal għal riżultat differenti.