type: contracts

text:
 Avis juridique important
 |
 21987A0905(04)
 Συμφωνία μεταξύ της Ευρωπαϊκής Οικονομικής Κοινότητας και του Βασιλείου της Ταϊλάνδης για το εμπόριο κλωστοϋφαντουργικών προϊόντων - Πρωτόκολλα - Εγκεκριμένα πρακτικά - Ανταλλαγή διακοινώσεων - Κοινή δήλωση των συμβαλλομένων μερών ανεπίσημη μετάφραση
 Επίσημη Εφημερίδα αριθ. L 255 της 05/09/1987 σ. 0127 - 0175 L 325 23/11/1990 P. 0041
 ΑΓΡΕΕΜΕΝΤβετςεεν τηε Εθροπεαν Εψονομιψ Ψομμθνιτζ ανδ τηε Κινγδομ οφ Τηαιλανδ ον τραδε ιν τεχτιλε προδθψτσDone at Brussels on 28 June 1986THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,of the one part, andTHE GOVERNMENT OF THE KINGDOM OF THAILAND,of the other part,DESIRING to promote, with a view to permanent cooperation and in conditions providing every security for trade, the orderly and equitable development of trade in textile products between the European Economic Community (hereinafter referred to as 'the Community') and the Kingdom of Thailand ('hereinafter Argentina') referred to as 'Thailand').RESOLVED to take the fullest possible account of the serious economic and social problems at present affecting the textile industry in both importing and exporting countries, and in particular, to eliminate real risks of market disruption on the market of the Community and real risks of disruption to the textile trade of Thailand.HAVING REGARD to the Arrangement regarding International Trade in Textiles (hereinafter referred to as 'the Geneva Arrangement'), and in particular Article 4 thereof; and to the conditions set out in the Protocol extending the Arrangement.HAVE DECIDED to conclude this Agreement and to this end have designated as their Plenipotentiaries:THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES:THE GOVERNMENT OF THE KINGDOM OF THAILAND:WHO HAVE AGREED AS FOLLOWS:SECTION ITrade arrangementsArticle 11. The Parties recognize and confirm that, subject to the provisions of this Agreement and without prejudice to their rights and obligations under the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, the conduct of their mutual trade in textile products shall be governed by the provisions of the Geneva Arrangement.2. In respect of the products covered by this Agreement, the Community undertakes not to introduce quantitative restrictions under Article XIX of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade or Article 3 of the Geneva Arrangement.3. Measures having equivalent effect to quantitative restrictions on the importation into the Community of the products covered by this Agreement shall be prohibited.Article 21. This Agreement shall apply to trade in textile products of cotton, wool and man-made fibres originating in Thailand which are listed in Annex I.2. The classification of the products covered by this Agreement is based on the Nomenclature of the Common Customs Tariff and on the Nomenclature of Goods for the External Trade Statistics of the Community and the Statistics of Trade between Member States (NIMEXE).From the entry into force of the International Convention on the Harmonized Commodity Description and Coding System (HS) this classification will be based on the Harmonized System and on the Community nomenclatures derived from that system.3. The origin of the products covered by this Agreement shall be determined in accordance with the rules in force in the Community.Any amendment to these rules of origin shall be communicated to Thailand and shall not have the effect of reducing any quantitative limit established in Annex II.The procedures for control of the origin of the products referred to above are laid down in Protocol A.Article 3Thailand agrees for each Agreement year to restrain its exports to the Community of the products described in Annex II to the limits set out therein.Exports of textile products set out in Annex II shall be subject to a double-checking system specified in Protocol A.Article 4Thailand and the Community recognize the special and differential character of re-imports of textile products into the Community after processing in Thailand.Provided that they are effected in accordance with the regulations on economic outward processing in force in the Community, these re-imports are not subject to the quantitative limits set out in Annex II when they are subject to the specific arrangements laid down in Protocol E.Article 5Exports of cottage industry fabrics woven on hand- or foot-operated looms, garments or other articles obtained manually from such fabrics and traditional folklore handicraft products shall not be subject to quantitative limits, provided that these products meet the conditions laid down in Protocol B.Article 61. Imports into the Community of textile products covered by this Agreement shall not be subject to the quantitative limits established in Annex II, provided that they are declared to be for re-export outside the Community in the same state or after processing, within the framework of the administrative system of control which exists within the Community.However, the release for home use of products imported under the conditions referred to above shall be subject to the production of an export certificate issued by the Thai authorities, and to proof of origin in accordance with the provisions of Protocol A.2. Where the Community authorities have evidence that imports of textile products have been set off against a quantitative limit established under this Agreement, but that the products have subsequently been re-exported outside the Community, the authorities concerned shall inform the Thai authorities within four weeks of the quantities involved and authorize imports of identical quantities of the same products, which shall not be set off against the quantitative limit established under this Agreement for the current or the following year.Article 71. In any Agreement year advance use of a portion of the quantitative limit established for the following Agreement year is authorized for each category of products up to 5 % of the quantitative limit for the current Agreement year.Amounts delivered in advance shall be deducted from the corresponding quantitative limits established for the following Agreement year.2. Carryover to the corresponding quantitative limit for the following Agreement year of the amounts not used during any Agreement year is authorized for each category of products up to 7 % of the quantitative limit for the current Agreement year.3. Transfers in respect of categories in Group I shall not be made from any category except as follows:- transfers between categories 2 and 3 and from category 1 to categories 2 and 3 may be made up to 7 % of the quantitative limits for the category to which the transfer is made,- transfers between categories 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 may be made up to 7 % of the quantitative limit for the category to which the transfer is made.Transfers into any category in Groups II and III may be made from any category or categories in Groups I, II and III up to 7 % of the quantitative limit for the category to which the transfer is made.4. The table of equivalence applicable to the transfers referred to above is given in Annex I to this Agreement.5. The increase in any category of products resulting from the cumulative application of the provisions in paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 above during an Agreement year shall not exceed 17 %.6. Prior notification shall be given by the authorities of Thailand in the event of recourse to the provisions of paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 above.Article 81. Exports of textile products not listed in Annex II to this Agreement may be made subject to quantitative limits by Thailand on the conditions laid down in the following paragraphs.2. Where the Community finds, under the system of administrative control set up, that the level of imports of products in a given category not listed in Annex II originating in Argentina exceeds, in relation to the preceding year's total imports into the Community from all sources of products in that category, the following rates:- 1 % for categories of products in Group I,- 5 % for categories of products in Group II,- 10 % for categories of products in Group III.It may request the opening of consultations in accordance with the procedure described in Article 16 of this Agreement, with a view to reaching agreement on an appropriate restraint level for the products in such category.The Community shall authorize the importation of products of the said category shipped from Thailand before the date on which the request for consultations was submitted.3. Pending a mutually satisfactory solution, Thailand undertakes to limit exports of the products in the category concerned to the Community or to the regions of the Community market specified by the Community for a provisional period of three months from the date on which the request for consultations is made. Such provisional limit shall be established at 25 % of the level of imports reached during the calendar year preceding that in which imports exceeded the level resulting from the application of the formula set out in paragraph 2, and gave rise to the request for consultation or 25 % of the level resulting from the application of the formula set out in paragraph 2, whichever is the higher.4. Should the Parties be unable in the course of consultations to reach a satisfactory solution within the period specified in Article 16 of the Agreement, the Community shall have the right to introduce a definitive quantitative limit at an annual level not lower than the level resulting from the application of the formula set out in paragraph 2, or 106 % of the level of imports reached during the calendar year preceding that in which imports exceeded the level resulting from the application of the formula set out in paragraph 2 and gave rise to the request for consultations whichever is the higher.The annual level so fixed shall be revised upwards after consultations in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 16, with a view to fulfilling the conditions set out in paragraph 2, should the trend of total imports into the Community of the product in question make this necessary.5. The limits introduced under paragraph 2 or paragraph 4 may in no case be lower than the level of imports of products in that category originating in Thailand in 1986.6. Quantitative limits may also be established by the Community on a regional basis in accordance with the provisions of Protocol C.7. The annual growth rate for the quantitative limits introduced under this Article shall be determined in accordance with the provisions of Protocol D.8. The provisions of this Article shall not apply where the percentages specified in paragraph 2 have been reached as a result of fall in total imports into the Community, and not as a result of an increase in exports or products originating in Thailand.9. In the event of the provisions of paragraph 2, 3 or 4 being applied, Thailand undertakes to issue export licencesfor products covered by contracts concluded before the introduction of the quantitative limit, up to the volume of the quantitative limit fixed.10. Up to the date of communication of the statistics referred to in Article 9 (6), the provisions of paragraph 2 of this Article shall apply on the basis of the annual statistics previously communicated by the Community.11. The provisions of this Agreement which concern exports of products subject to the quantitative limits established in Annex II shall also apply to products for which quantitative limits are introduced under this Article.Article 91. Thailand undertakes to supply the Community with precise statistical information on all export licences issued by the Thai authorities for all categories of textile products subject to the quantitative limits established under this Agreement as well as on all certificates issued by the Thai authorities for all products referred to in Article 5 and subject to the provisions of Protocol B.The Community shall likewise supply the Thai authorities precise statistical information on import authorizations or documents issued by the Community authorities in respect of export licences and certificates issued by Thailand.2. The information referred to in paragraph 1 shall, for all categories of products, be forwarded before the end of the second month following the quarter to which the statistics relate.3. The Community shall forward to the Thai authorities import statistics for all products covered by the system of administrative control referred to in Article 8 (2) and for products covered by Article 6 (1).4. The information referred to in paragraph 3 shall, for all categories of products, be transmitted before the end of the third month following the quarter to which the statistics relate.5. Should it be found on analysis of the information exchanged that there are significant discrepancies between the returns for exports and those for imports, consultations may be initiated in accordance with the procedure specified in Article 16.6. For the purpose of applying the provisions of Article 8, the Community undertakes to provide the Thai authorities before 15 April of each year with the preceding year's statistics on imports of all textile products covered by this Agreement, broken down by supplying country and Community Member State.Article 101. Should there be divergent opinions between Thai and the competent Community authorities at the point of entry into the Community on the classification of products covered by this Agreement, classification shall provisionally be based on indications provided by the Community, pending consultations in accordance with Article 16 with a view to reaching agreement on definitive classification of the product concerned.2. If the above provisional classification results in provisional debit against a quantitative limit for a category of products other than the category indicated on the export documents issued by the competent Thai authorities, the Community shall inform Thailand of such provisional debit within 30 days.3. The authorities of Thailand shall be informed of any amendment to the tariff and statistical nomenclatures in force in the Community or any decision, made in accordance with the procedures in force in the Community, relating to the classification of products covered by this Agreement.Any amendment to the tariff and statistical nomenclatures in force in the Community or any decision which results in a modification of the classification of products covered by this Agreement shall not have the effect of reducing any quantitative limit established in Annex II.The procedures for the application of this paragraph are set out in Protocol A.Article 111. Thailand and the Community agree to cooperate fully in preventing the circumvention of the present Agreement by transhipment, rerouting or whatever other means.2. Where information available to the Community as a result of the investigations carried out in accordance with the procedures set out in Protocol A constitutes evidence that products of Thai origin subject to quantitatives limits established under this Agreement have been transhipped, rerouted or otherwise imported into the Community in circumvention of this Agreement, the Community may request the opening of consultations in accordance with the procedures described in Article 16 with a view to reaching agreement on an equivalent adjustment of the corresponding quantitative limits established under this Agreement.3. Pending the result of the consultations referred to in paragraph 2, Thailand shall as a precautionary measure, if so requested by the Community, make the necessary arrangements to ensure that adjustments of quantitative limits liable to be agreed following the consultations referred to in paragraph 2, may be carried out for the quota year in which the request to open consultations in accordance with paragraph 2 was made, or for the following year if the quota for the current year is exhausted, where clear evidence of circumvention is provided.4. Should the parties be unable in the course of consultations to reach a satisfactory solution within the period specified in Article 16, the Community shall have the right, where clear evidence of circumvention has been provided, to deduct from the quantitative limits established under this Agreement amounts equivalent to the products of Thai origin.Article 121. Thailand shall endeavour to ensure that exports of textile products subject to quantitative limits are spaced out as evenly as possible over an Agreement year, due account being taken, in particular, of seasonal factors.2. Should there be an excessive concentration of imports on any product within a category subject to quantitative limits under this Agreement, the Community may request consultations in accordance with the procedure specified in Article 16 of this Agreement with a view to remedying this situation. Article 13Should recourse be had to the denunciation provisions of Article 18 (4), the quantitative limits established in Annex II shall be adapted on a pro rata basis. Article 141. For the purpose of the administration of this Agreement, the limits referred to in Article 3 are broken down by the Community into shares for each of its Member States.2. Portions of the quantitative limits established in Annex II not used in one Member State of the Community may be reallocated to another Member State in accordance with the procedures in force in the Community.The Community undertakes to examine with care and reply within four weeks to any request made for reallocation by Thailand. In the event of agreement on such reallocation, the flexibility provisions set out in Article 7 shall continue to be applicable to the levels of the original allocation.If, in the course of the application of this Agreement, Thailand finds that the break-down of a limit established in Annex II causes particular difficulties, it may request the opening of consultations in accordance with Article 16 with a view to reaching a mutually satisfactory solution.3. After the first of June of each year of application of the Agreement, Thailand may transfer, subject to prior notification to the Community, the unused quantities of the regional quota-shares of a Community quantitative limit, set out in Annex II, to the quota-shares of the same limit of other regions of the Community provided that the regional quota-share from which the transfer is made is utilized by less than 80 %, and up to the amount of the followingpercentages of the quota-share to which the transfer is made:- 2 % in the first year of the application of the Agreement,- 4 % in the second year of the application of the Agreement,- 8 % in the third year of the application of the Agreement,- 12 % in the fourth year of the application of the Agreement.4. Should it appear in any given region of the Community that additional supplies are required, the Community may, where measures taken pursuant to paragraph 1 are inadequate to cover those requirements, authorize the importation of amounts greater than those stipulated in Annex II.Article 151. Thailand and the Community undertake to refrain from discrimination in the allocation of export licences and import authorizations or documents referred to in Protocols A and B.2. In implementing this Agreement, the Contracting Parties shall take care to maintain the traditional commercial practices and trade flows between the Community and Thailand.3. Should either Party find that the application of this Agreement is disturbing existing commercial relations between importers in the Community and suppliers in Thailand consultations shall be started promptly, in accordance with the procedure specified in Article 16 with a view to remedying this situation.Article 161. The special consultation procedures referred to in this Agreement shall be governed by the following rules:- any request for consultations shall be notified in writing to the other Party,- the request for consultations shall be followed within a reasonable period (and in any case not later than 15 days following the notification) by a statement setting out the reasons and circumstances which, in the opinion of the requesting Party, justify the submission of such a request,- the Parties shall enter into consultations within one month at the latest of notification of the request, with a view to reaching agreement or a mutually acceptable conclusion within one further month at the latest.2. The Community may request consultations in accordance with paragraph 1 when it ascertains that during a particular year of application of the Agreement difficulties arise in the Community or one of its regions from a sharp and substantial increase, by comparison to the preceding year, in imports of a given category of Group I subject to the quantitative limits set out in Annex II.3. If necessary, at the request of either of the Parties and in conformity with the provisions of the Geneva Arrangement, consultations shall be held on any problems arising from the application of this Agreement. Any consultations held under this Article shall be approached by both Parties in a spirit of cooperation and with a desire to reconcile the difference between them.Article 17This Agreement shall apply, on the one hand, to the territories within which the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community is applied and under the conditions laid down in that Treaty and, on the other hand, to the territory of Thailand.SECTION IITransitional and final provisionsArticle 181. This Agreement shall enter into force on the first day of the month following the date of its signature. It shall be applicable until 31 December 1990.2. This Agreement shall apply with effect from 1 January 1987.3. Either Party may at any time propose modifications to the Agreement.4. Either Party may at any time denounce this Agreement provided that at least 120 days' notice is given. In that event, the Agreement shall come to an end on the expiry of the period of notice.5. The Annexes, Protocols, Agreed Minutes, the Joint Declaration and the Memorandum of Understanding to this Agreement shall form an integral part thereof.Article 19This Agreement shall be drawn up in two copies in the Danish, Dutch, English, French, German, Greek, Italian, Portuguese and Spanish languages, each of these texts being equally authentic.ΑΝΝΕΧ Ι LIST OF PRODUCTS 1. When the constitutive material of the products of categories 1 to 114 is not specifically mentioned these products are to be taken to be made exclusively of wool or of fine animal hair, of cotton or of man-made fibres.2. Garments which are not recognizable as being garments for men or boys or as garments for women or girls are classified with the latter.3. Where the expression 'babies' garments' is used, this is meant also to cover girls' garments up to and including commercial size 86.>ΘΕΣΗ ΠΗΝΑΚΑ>>ΘΕΣΗ ΠΗΝΑΚΑ>>ΘΕΣΗ ΠΗΝΑΚΑ>>ΘΕΣΗ ΠΗΝΑΚΑ>>ΘΕΣΗ ΠΗΝΑΚΑ>>ΘΕΣΗ ΠΗΝΑΚΑ>ΑΝΝΕΧ ΙΙ For practical reasons the product descriptions used in Annex I are given in the present Annex in abbreviated form>ΘΕΣΗ ΠΗΝΑΚΑ>>ΘΕΣΗ ΠΗΝΑΚΑ>ΠΡΟΤΟΨΟΛ Α ΤΙΤΛΕ ΙCLASSIFICATIONArticle 11. The competent authorities of the Community undertake to inform Thailand of any changes in the tariff and statistical nomenclatures before the date of their entry into effect in the Community.2. The competent authorities of the Community undertake to inform Thailand of any decisions relating to the classification of products subject to the Agreement within one month of their adoption at the latest. Such communication shall include:(a) a description of the products concerned;(b) the relevant category and the related tariff and statistical references;(c) the reasons which have led to the decision.3. Where a decision on classification results in a change of classification practice or a change of category of any product subject to the Agreement, the competent authorities of the Community shall provide 30 day's notice, from the date of the Community's communication, before the decision is put into effect. Products shipped before the date of application of the decision shall remain subject to the earlier classification practice, provided that the goods in question are presented for importation into the Community within 60 days of that date.4. Where a Community decision on classification resulting in a change of classification practice or a change of categorization of any product subject to the Agreement affects a category subject to restraint, the two Parties agree to enter into consultations in accordance with the procedures described in Article 16 (1) of the Agreement with a view to honouring the obligation under the second subparagraph of Article 10 (3) of the Agreement.TITLE IIORIGINArticle 21. Products originating in Thailand for export to the Community in accordance with the arrangements established by this Agreement shall be accompanied by a certificate of Thai origin conforming to the model annexed to this Protocol.2. The certificate of origin shall be issued by the competent governmental authorities of Thailand if the products in question can be considered products originatingin that country within the meaning of the relevant rules in force in the Community.3. The certificate of origin referred to in paragraph 1 shall not be required for import of goods covered by a certificate of origin Form A or Form APR completed in accordance with the relevant Community rules in order to qualify for generalized tariff preferences.Article 3The certificate of origin shall be issued only on application having been made in writing by the exporter or, under the exporter's responsibility, by his authorized representative. The competent governmental authorties of Thailand shall ensure that the certificate of origin is properly completed and for this purpose they shall call for any necessary documentary evidence or carry out any check which they consider appropriate.Article 4Where different criteria for determining origin are laid down for products falling within the same category, certificates or declarations of origin shall contain a sufficiently detailed description of the goods to enable the criterion to be determined on the basis of which the certificate was issued or the declaration drawn up.Article 5The discovery of slight discrepancies between the statements made in the certificate of origin and those made in the documents produced to the customs office for the purpose of carrying out the formalities for importing the product shall not ipso facto cast doubt upon the statements in the certificate.TITLE IIIDOUBLE CHECKING SYSTEM FOR CATEGORIES OF PRODUCTS WITH QUANTITATIVE LIMITSSection IExportationArticle 6The competent authorities of Thailand shall issue an export licence in respect of all consignments from Thailand oftextile products referred to in Annex II, up to the relevant quantitative limits as may be modified by Articles 7, 13 and 14 of the Agreement and of textile products subject to any definitive or provisional quantitative limits established as a result of the application of Article 8 of the Agreement.Article 71. The export licence shall conform to the model annexed to this Protocol. It must certify inter alia that the quantity of the product in question has been set off against the quantitative limit prescribed for the category of the product in question.2. Each export licence shall only cover one of the categories of products listed in Annex II of this Agreement. It may be used for one or more consignments of the products in question.Article 8The competent Community authorities must be notified forthwith of the withdrawal or alteration of any export licence already issued.Article 91. Exports shall be set off against the quantitative limits established for the year in which shipment of the goods has been effected, even if the export certificate is issued after such shipment.2. For the purpose of applying paragraph 1, shipment of the goods is considered to have taken place on the date of their loading on to the exporting aircraft, vehicle or vessel.Article 10The presentation of an export licence, in application of Article 12, shall be effected not later than 31 March of the year following that in which the goods covered by the licence have been shipped.Section IIImportationArticle 11Importation into the Community of textile products subject to quantitative limits shall be subject to the presentation of an import authorization or document.Article 121. The competent Community authorities shall issue such import authorization or document automatically within fiveworking days of the presentation by the importer of the original of the corresponding export licence.The import authorization or document shall be valid for six months.2. The competent Community authorities shall cancel the already issued import authorization or document if the corresponding export licence has been withdrawn.However, if the competent Community authorities have not been notified of the withdrawal or cancellation of the export licence until after the products have been imported into the Community, the quantities involved shall be set off against the quantitative limit for the category and the quota year in question.Article 131. If the competent Community authorities find that the total quantities covered by export certificates issued by Thailand for a particular category in any Agreement year exceed the quantitative limit established in Annex II for that category, as may be modified by Articles 7, 13 and 14 of the Agreement, or any definitive or provisional limit established under Article 8 of the Agreement, the said authorities may suspend the further issue of import authorizations or documents. In this event, the competent Community authorities shall immediately inform the authorities of Thailand and the special consultation procedure set out in Article 16 of the Agreement shall be initiated forthwith.2. Exports of Thai origin not covered by Thai export licences issued in accordance with the provisions of this Protocol may be refused the issue of import authorizations or documents by the competent Community authorities.However, if the import of such products is allowed into the Community by the competent Community authorities, the quantities involved shall not be set off against the appropriate quantitative limits set out in Annex II or established as a result of the application of Article 8 of the Agreement, without the express agreement of Thailand save as provided for in Article 11 of the Agreement.TITLE IVFORM AND PRODUCTION OF EXPORT LICENCES AND CERTIFICATES OF ORIGIN, AND COMMON PROVISIONSArticle 141. The export licence and the certificate of origin may comprise additional copies duly indicated as such. They shall be made out in English or French. If they are completed by hand, entries must be in ink and in block capitals.These documents shall measure 210 Χ 297 mm. The paper used must be white writing paper, sized, not containing mechanical pulp and weighing not less than 25 g/m$. Eachpart shall have a printed guilloche-pattern background making any falsification by mechanical or chemical means apparent to the eye.If the documents have several copies only the top copy which is the original shall be printed with the guilloche-pattern background. This copy shall be clearly marked as 'original' and the other copies as 'copy'. Only the original shall be accepted by the competent authorities in the Community as being valid for the purposes of export to the Community in accordance with the arrangements established by this Agreement.2. Each document shall bear a standardized serial number, whether or not printed, by which it can be identified.This number shall be composed of the following elements:- two letters identifying Thailand as follows: TH,- two letters identifying countries of destination as follows:BL = BeneluxDE = Federal Republic of GermanyDK = DenmarkES = SpainFR = FranceGB = United KingdomGR = GreeceIE = IrelandIT = ItalyPT = Portugal- a one-digit number identifying quota year, corresponding to the last figure in year, e.g. 7 for 1987,- a two-digit number running consecutively from 01 to 99 identifying issuing office.- a five-digit number running consecutively from 00001 to 99999 allocated to the country of destination.Article 15The export licence and certificate of origin may be issued after the shipment of the products to which they relate. In such cases they shall bear either the endorsement 'dιlivrι a posteriori' or the endorsement 'Issued retrospectively'.Article 161. In the event of theft, loss or destruction of an export licence or a certificate of origin, the exporter may apply to the competent governmental authority which issued the document for a duplicate to be made out on the basis of the export documents in his possession. The duplicate of any such certificate or licence so issued shall bear the endorsement 'duplicata'.2. The duplicate must bear the date of the original export licence or certificate of origin.TITLE VADMINISTRATIVE COOPERATIONArticle 17The Community and Thailand shall cooperate closely to implement the provisions of this Agreement. To this end, contacts and exchanges of views (including on technical matters) shall be facilitated by both Parties.Article 18In order to ensure that the Agreement is properly applied, the Community and Thailand shall assist each other in checking the authenticity and accuracy of export licences and certificates of origin issued or declarations made under this Protocol.Article 19Thailand shall send the Commission of the European Communities the names and addresses of the governmental authorities competent for the issue and verification of export licences and certificates of origin together with specimens of the stamps used by these authorities. Thailand shall also notify the Commission of any change in this information.Article 201. Subsequent verification of certificates of origin or export licences shall be carried out at random, or whenever the competent Community authorities have reasonable doubt as to the authenticity of the certificate or licence or as to accuracy of the information regarding the products in question.2. In such cases the competent authorities in the Community shall return the certificate of origin or export licence or a copy thereof to the competent governmental authority in Thailand giving, where appropriate, the reasons of form or substance for an enquiry. If the invoice has been submitted, such invoice or a copy thereof shall be attached to the certificate or licence or its copy. The authorities shall also forward any information that has been obtained suggesting that the particulars given on the said certificate or licence are inaccurate.3. The results of the subsequent verifications carried out in accordance with paragraphs 1 and 2 shall be communicated to the competent authorities of the Community within three months at the latest. The information communicated shall indicate whether the disputed certificate or licence or declaration applied to the goods actually exported and whether these goods are eligible for export in accordance with the arrangements established by this Agreement. The information shall also include, at the requestof the Community, copies of all documentation necessary to determine the facts fully and in particular the true origin of the goods.4. For the purpose of subsequent verification of certificates of origin, copies of the certificates as well as any export documents referring to them shall be kept for at least two years by the competent governmental authority in Thailand.5. Recourse to the random verification procedure specified in this Article must not constitute an obstacle to the release for home use of the products in question.Article 211. Where the verification procedure referred to in Article 20 or where information available to the Community or to Thailand indicates or appears to indicate that the provisions of this Agreement are being contravened, both Parties shall cooperate closely and with appropriate urgency to prevent such contravention.2. To this end Thailand shall on its own initiative or at the request of the Community, carry out appropriateenquiries or arrange for such enquiries to be carried out concerning operations which are, or appear to the Community to be in contravention of this Agreement. Thailand shall communicate the results of these enquiries tothe Community together with any other pertinent information enabling the true origin of the goods to be determined.3. By agreement between the competent Community authorities and the competent Thai authorities, officials designated by the Community may be present at the enquiries referred to above.4. In pursuance of the cooperation referred to in paragraph 1, Thailand and the Community shall exchange any information considered by either party to be of use in preventing the contravention of the provisions of the Agreement. These exchanges may include information on textile production in Thailand and on trade in textile products of a kind covered by this Agreement, between Thailand and other countries, particularly where the Community has reasonable grounds to consider that the products in question may be in transit across the territory of Thailand prior to their importation into the Community. This information shall include at the request of the Community copies of all relevant documentation.5. Where it is established that the provisions of this Agreement have been contravened, Thailand and the Community may agree to take such measures as are necessary to prevent a recurrence of such contravention.ΠΡΟΤΟΨΟΛ Β 1. Τηε εχεμπτιον προωιδεδ φορ ιν Αρτιψλε 5 οφ τηε Αγρεεμεντ ιν ρεσπεψτ οφ ψοτταγε ινδθστρζ προδθψτσ σηαλλ αππλζ ονλζ το τηε φολλοςινγ προδθψτσ:(α) ^φαβριψσ ςοωεν ον ηανδ- ορ φοοτ-οπερατεδ λοομσ, βεινγ φαβριψσ οφ α κινδ τραδιτιοναλλζ μαδε ιν τηε ψοτταγε ινδθστρζ οφ Τηαιλανδ;(β) ^γαρμεντσ ορ οτηερ τεχτιλε αρτιψλεσ οφ α κινδ τραδιτιοναλλζ μαδε ιν τηε ψοτταγε ινδθστρζ οφ Τηαιλανδ οβταινεδ μανθαλλζ φρομ τηε φαβριψσ ρεφερρεδ το αβοωε ανδ σεςν εχψλθσιωελζ βζ ηανδ ςιτηοθτ τηε αιδ οφ ανζ μαψηινε;(ψ) ^τραδιτιοναλ φολκλορε τεχτιλε προδθψτσ οφ Τηαιλανδ μαδε βζ ηανδ ιν τηε ψοτταγε ινδθστρζ οφ Τηαιλανδ ασ δεφινεδ ιν α λιστ το βε αγρεεδ βετςεεν βοτη Παρτιεσ ανδ αννεχεδ το τηισ Προτοψολ.Εχεμπτιον σηαλλ βε γραντεδ ονλζ φορ προδθψτσ αψψομπανιεδ βζ α ψερτιφιψατε ισσθεδ βζ τηε ψομπετεντ Τηαι αθτηοριτιεσ ιν αψψορδανψε ςιτη τηε σπεψιμεν αννεχεδ το τηισ Προτοψολ. Σθψη ψερτιφιψατεσ σηαλλ στατε τηε γροθνδ ον ςηιψη εχεμπτιον ισ βασεδ ανδ σηαλλ βε αψψεπτεδ βζ τηε ψομπετεντ Ψομμθνιτζ αθτηοριτιεσ προωιδεδ τηατ τηεζ αρε σατισφιεδ τηατ τηε προδθψτσ ψονψερνεδ ψονφορμ το τηε ψονδιτιονσ σετ οθτ ιν τηισ Προτοψολ. Ψερτιφιψατεσ ψοωερινγ τηε προδθψτσ ρεφερρεδ το ιν παραγραπη (ψ) αβοωε σηαλλ βεαρ α ψονσπιψθοθσ σταμπ: 'ΦΟΛΚΛΟΡΕ'. Ιν ψασε οφ διωεργεντ οπινιον βετςεεν Τηαιλανδ ανδ τηε ψομπετεντ Ψομμθνιτζ αθτηοριτιεσ ατ τηε ποιντ οφ εντρζ ιντο τηε Ψομμθνιτζ ασ το τηε νατθρε οφ σθψη προδθψτσ, ψονσθλτατιονσ σηαλλ βε ηελδ ςιτηιν ονε μοντη ςιτη α ωιες το ρεσολωινγ σθψη διωεργενψεσ. Σηοθλδ ιμπορτσ οφ ανζ οφ τηε αβοωε προδθψτσ ρεαψη σθψη προπορτιονσ ασ το ψαθσε διφφιψθλτιεσ το τηε Ψομμθνιτζ, τηε τςο Παρτιεσ σηαλλ οπεν ψονσθλτατιονσ φορτηςιτη ιν αψψορδανψε ςιτη τηε προψεδθρε λαιδ δοςν ιν Αρτιψλε 16 οφ τηε Αγρεεμεντ ςιτη α ωιες το φινδινγ α qθαντιτατιωε σολθτιον το τηε προβλεμ.2. Τηε προωισιονσ οφ Τιτλε ΙΩ ανδ Ω οφ Προτοψολ Α σηαλλ αππλζ mutatis mutandis to the products referred to in paragraph 1 of this Protocol. Denomination of productsDescription of productsAnnex II to Protocol BList of traditional folklore handicraft textile products of Thailand as agreed between the European Economic Community and Thailand in accordance with subparagraph (c) of Protocol BProducts listed below are indicated by Thailand as being uniquely and historically traditional folklore textile products made by hand in the cottage industry of Thailand.>ΘΕΣΗ ΠΗΝΑΚΑ>ΠΡΟΤΟΨΟΛ Ψ Under Article 8 (6) of the Agreement, a quantitative limit may be fixed on a regional basis where imports of a given product into any region of the Community in relation to the amounts determined in accordance with paragraph 2 of the said Article 8 exceed the following regional percentage:Germany // 25,5 %Benelux // 9,5 %France // 16,5 %Italy // 13,5 %Denmark // 2,7 %Ireland // 0,8 %United Kingdom // 21,0 %Greece // 1,5 %Spain // 7,5 %Portugal // 1,5 %ΠΡΟΤΟΨΟΛ Δ The annual growth rate for the quantitative limits introduced under Article 8 of the Agreement shall be determined as follows:For products in categories falling within Group I, II, III, the growth rate shall be fixed by agreement between the Parties in accordance with the consultation procedure established in Article 16 of the Agreement. Such growth rate may in no case be lower than the highest rate applied to corresponding products under bilateral agreements concluded under the Geneva Arrangement between the Community and other third countries having a level of trade equal to or comparable with that of Thailand.ΠΡΟΤΟΨΟΛ Ε Re-imports in the sense of Article 4 (2) of this Agreement into the Community of products listed in the Annex to this Protocol shall be subject to the provisions of the Agreement except as specifically provided for by the particular provisions set out below:1. Only re-imports into the Community subject to the specific quantitative limits set out in the Annex to this Protocol, as may be modified by the application of paragraphs 2 and 3 shall be considered re-imports in the sense of Article 4 (2).2. Re-imports not covered by the Annex may be submitted to specific quantitative limits following consultations in accordance with the procedures set out in Article 16 of the Agreement, provided the products concerned are subject to the quantitative limits established under Annex II to the Agreement.3. The Community may, at its own discretion, and bearing in mind the interest of both parties, or in the framework of a request set out in Article 16 of the Agreement:(a) examine the possibilities of transfers between categories and advance use or carry-over of portions of specific quantitative limits from one year to another;(b) consider the scope for reallocating portions of any specific quantitative limits not used in one region of the Community to another region.4. However, the Community may automatically carry out the flexibilities in the sense of paragraph 3 up to the following extent:(a) transfer between categories up to 20 % of the share established for the category to which the transfer is made;(b) carry-over of specific quantitative limits from one year to another up to 10,5 % of the share for the year of actual utilization;(c) advance use of specific quantitative limits from one year to another up to 7,5 % of the share for the year of actual utilization.5. The Community shall inform Thailand of any measures taken pursuant to the preceding paragraphs.6. Debiting against a specific quantitative limit referred to in paragraph 1 shall be carried out by the competent authorities of the Community at the time of issuing the prior authorization provided for by the Community regulation on economic outward processing, Regulation (EEC) N° 636/82. A specific quantitative limit shall be debited for the year in which a prior authorization is issued.7. A certificate of origin shall be issued for all products covered by the present Protocol by Thailand in accordance with the provisions of Protocol A of the Agreement, bearing a reference to the prior authorization referred to in paragraph 6 as evidence that the processing operation described in the prior authorization has been carried out in Thailand.8. The Community shall provide Thailand with the names, addresses and the specimens of stamps used by the competent authorities of the Community for the issue of the prior authorizations referred to in paragraph 6.9. Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraphs 1 to 8 above Thailand and the Community will continue to consult together to seek a mutually acceptable means to enable both parties to take advantage of the OPT provisions in the Agreement with a view to effective development of trade in textiles between Thailand and the Community.Annex to Protocol EFor practical reasons the product descriptions used in Annex I are given in the present Annex in abbreviated form>ΘΕΣΗ ΠΗΝΑΚΑ>ΠΡΟΤΟΨΟΛ Φ The Community and Thailand agree that if the Multifibre Arrangement is extended for a period going beyond 31 December 1990 then the present Agreement will be automatically prolonged for a further period of one year up to 31 December 1991 in accordance with the economic and technical terms of the existing Agreement, with the adaptations strictly necessary for the application of the Agreement for the fifth year.Αγρεεδ Μινθτε In the context of the Agreement between the Community and Thailand on trade in textile products initialled on 28 June 1986 the Community declared its readiness to consider in a spirit of cooperation with a view to reaching an appropriate solution any request made by Thailand for advance use and carryover of a portion of any quantitative limit, as provided for in Article 7 (1) and (2) of the Agreement, beyond the extent provided for in the said Article 7.It was agreed that advance use of a portion of the quantitative limits for 1987 for each category of products is authorized up to 5 % of the corresponding quantitative limit for 1986.It was further agreed that carryover to the quantitative limits for the year 1987 of amounts not used during the year 1986 is authorized up to 7 % of the corresponding quantitative limit for 1987. Head of Delegation of the Kingdom of ThailandHead of Delegation of the European Economic CommunityΕχψηανγε οφ Νοτεσ The Mission of the Kingdom of Thailand to the European Communities presents its compliments to the Directorate-General for External Relations of the Commission of the European Communities and has the honour to refer to the Agreement on textile products between Thailand and the Community initialled on 28 June 1986.The Mission wishes to inform the Directorate-General that whilst awaiting the completion of the necessary procedures for the conclusion and the coming into force of the Agreement, the Government of the Kingdom of Thailand will apply de facto the provisions of the Agreement from 1 January 1987 if the Community is disposed to do likewise.The Mission would be grateful if the Community would confirm its agreement to the foregoing.The Mission of the Kindom of Thailand to the European Communities avails itself of this opportunity to renew to the Directorate-General for External Relations of the Commission of the European Communities the assurance of its highest consideration.Εχψηανγε οφ Νοτεσ The Directorate-General for External Relations of the Commission of the European Communities presents its compliments to the Mission of the Kingdom of Thailand to the European Communities and has the honour to refer to the Note of 28 June 1986 regarding the Agreement on textile products between Thailand and the Community initalled on 28 June 1986.The Directorate-General wishes to confirm that whilst awaiting the completion of the necessary procedures for the conclusion and the coming into force of the Agreement, the Community will apply de facto the provisions of the Agreement from 1 January 1987.The Directorate-General for External Relations of the Commission of the European Communities avails itself of this opportunity to renew to the Mission of the Kingdom of Thailand to the European Communities the assurance of its highest consideration.Αγρεεδ Μινθτε The Community and Thailand agree that transfers of quantitative limits of one ASEAN country into quantitative limits of another ASEAN country into any category of Groups I, II and III may be made, after notification, up to 10 % of the regional share of a quantitative limit to which the transfer is made, provided that an equivalent quantity is deducted from the share of the corresponding quantitative limit for the same region established in the Community's Agreement with another ASEAN country.Implementation of such transfers shall be subject to receipt of a corresponding notification from the ASEAN country accepting a deduction of the quantitative limit concerned.Such transfers shall be applicable for the year during which the notification is made. Head of Delegation of the Kingdom of ThailandHead of Delegation of the European Economic CommunityΞΟΙΝΤ ΔΕΨΛΑΡΑΤΙΟΝ ΨΟΝΨΕΡΝΙΝΓ ΒΑΤΙΚ ΦΑΒΡΙΨΣ ΑΝΔ ΠΡΟΔΘΨΤΣ ΤΗΕΡΕΟΦ A. The Community and Thailand agree that batik fabric may not be described as having been produced by the traditional handicraft batik process unless, for each of the colours or shades applied to the fabric, each of the following three operations has been carried out by hand:(a) waxing (application of wax by hand to the fabric);(b) dyeing/painting (application of colour either by the traditional cottage method of dyeing or by hand-painting);(c) de-waxing (boiling the fabric to remove the wax).B. The parties hereby further agree to the following arrangements:1. The competent Community authorities will accept as traditional folklore handicraft textile products within the meaning of Article 1 (c) of Protocol B all batik fabrics, irrespective of the method of manufacture of the basic fabric, and all products made or made up therefrom, whether sewn by hand or on a hand- or foot-operated sewing machine, provided that the process of applying colours and shades to the fabric has been the traditional handicraft batik process described at A above, and subject to appropriate certification by the competent Thai authorities.2. The competent Thai authorities will issue certificates conforming to the model annexed to Protocol B for batik fabrics or products thereof only when such fabrics or products have been produced by the processes, including in particular the traditional handicraft batik process, specified in the preceding paragraph. Head of Delegation of the Kingdom of ThailandHead of Delegation of the European Economic Community


jurisdiction: EU

text:
 Avis juridique important
 |
 22001D0203
 2001/203/CE: Decisão n.° 2/2001 do Conselho de Associação UE-Estónia, de 24 de Janeiro de 2001, que altera o Protocolo n.° 3, relativo à definição da noção de "produtos originários" e aos métodos de cooperação administrativa, do Acordo Europeu UE-Estónia
 Jornal Oficial no L 073 de 15/03/2001 p. 0028 - 0031
 Decisão n.o 2/2001 do Conselho de Associação UE-Estóniade 24 de Janeiro de 2001que altera o Protocolo n.o 3, relativo à definição da noção de "produtos originários" e aos métodos de cooperação administrativa, do Acordo Europeu UE-Estónia(2001/203/CE)O CONSELHO DE ASSOCIAÇÃO,Tendo em conta o Acordo Europeu que cria uma associação entre as Comunidades Europeias e os seus Estados-Membros, por um lado, e a República da Estónia, por outro(1), assinado no Luxemburgo em 12 de Junho de 1995, e, nomeadamente, o artigo 38.o do seu Protocolo n.o 3,Considerando o seguinte:(1) A definição da noção de "produtos originários" deve ser alterada, a fim de assegurar o correcto funcionamento do sistema de cumulação alargado que permite a utilização de matérias originárias da Comunidade Europeia, da Polónia, da Hungria, da República Checa, da República Eslovaca, da Bulgária, da Roménia, da Estónia, da Lituânia, da Letónia, da Eslovénia, da Turquia, do Espaço Económico Europeu, da Islândia, da Noruega e da Suíça.(2) É aconselhável rever os artigos relativos aos montantes, a fim de ter inteiramente em conta a entrada em vigor do euro.(3) Para ter em conta a evolução das técnicas de transformação e as faltas de determinadas matérias-primas, deve-se corrigir a lista dos requisitos das operações de complemento de fabrico ou de transformação que as matérias não originárias devem satisfazer para adquirir a qualidade de produto originário.(4) O Protocolo n.o 3 deve, pois, ser alterado,DECIDE:Artigo 1.oO Protocolo n.o 3 relativo à definição da noção de "produtos originários" e aos métodos de cooperação administrativa é alterado do seguinte modo:1. Nos artigos 21.o e 26.o, o termo "ecu" é substituído por "euro".2. O artigo 30.o passa a ter a seguinte redacção:"Artigo 30.oMontantes expressos em euros1. O contravalor em moeda nacional do país de exportação do montante expresso em euros será fixado pelo país de exportação e comunicado aos países de importação pela Comissão Europeia.2. Quando o montante for superior ao montante correspondente fixado pelo país de importação, este último aceitá-lo-á se os produtos estiverem facturados na moeda do país de exportação. Se os produtos estiverem facturados na moeda dos Estados-Membros da CE ou de um outro país referido nos artigos 3.o e 4.o, o país de importação reconhecerá o montante notificado pelo país em causa.3. Os montantes a utilizar numa determinada moeda nacional serão o contravalor, nessa moeda, dos montantes expressos em euros no primeiro dia útil de Outubro de 1999.4. Os montantes expressos em euros e o seu contravalor nas moedas nacionais dos Estados-Membros e da Estónia serão revistos pelo Comité de Associação a pedido da Comunidade ou da Estónia. Ao proceder a essa revisão, o Comité de Associação assegurará que os montantes a utilizar em moeda nacional não registem uma diminuição e considerará, além disso, a conveniência de preservar os efeitos dos limites em causa em termos reais. Para o efeito, o Comité de Associação pode decidir alterar os montantes em euros."3. O anexo II é alterado do seguinte modo:a) O descritivo da posição SH 1904 passa a ter a seguinte redacção:">POSIÇÃO NUMA TABELA>"b) O descritivo da posição SH 2207 passa a ter a seguinte redacção:">POSIÇÃO NUMA TABELA>"c) O descritivo do capítulo 57 do SH passa a ter a seguinte redacção:">POSIÇÃO NUMA TABELA>"d) O descritivo da posição SH 8401 passa a ter a seguinte redacção:">POSIÇÃO NUMA TABELA>"e) Entre os descritivos relativos às posições SH 9606 e 9612 é inserido o seguinte:">POSIÇÃO NUMA TABELA>"Artigo 2.oA presente decisão entra em vigor na data da sua aprovação.A presente decisão é aplicável a partir de 1 de Janeiro de 2000.Feito em Bruxelas, em 24 de Janeiro de 2001.Pelo Conselho de AssociaçãoO PresidenteT. H. Ilves(1) JO L 68 de 9.3.1998, p. 3.


type: caselaw

text:
 14.12.2013
 HR
 Službeni list Europske unije
 C 367/12
 Presuda Suda (treće vijeće) od 17. listopada 2013. (zahtjev za prethodnu odluku koji je uputio Hof van Cassatie van België — Belgija) — United Antwerp Maritime Agencies (UNAMAR) NV protiv Navigation Maritime Bulgare
 (Predmet C-184/12) (1)
 (Rimska konvencija o mjerodavnom pravu za ugovorne obveze - Članak 3. i članak 7. stavak 2. - Stranačka sloboda izbora prava - Granice - Prisilni propisi - Direktiva 86/653/EEZ - Samozaposleni trgovački zastupnici - Ugovori o prodaji ili kupnji robe - Raskid ugovora o zastupanju od strane nalogodavca - Nacionalni provedbeni propisi koji predviđaju zaštitu koja premašuje minimalne zahtjeve Direktive te zaštitu trgovačkih zastupnika u okviru ugovora o pružanju usluga)
 2013/C 367/19
 Jezik postupka: nizozemski
 Sud koji je uputio zahtjev
 Hof van Cassatie van België
 Stranke glavnog postupka
 Tužitelj: United Antwerp Maritime Agencies (UNAMAR) NV
 Tuženik: Navigation Maritime Bulgare
 Predmet
 Zahtjev za prethodnu odluku — Hof van Cassatie van België — Tumačenje članka 3. i članka 7. stavka 2. Rimske konvencije o mjerodavnom pravu za ugovorne obveze, otvorene za potpisivanje u Rimu 19. lipnja 1980. (SL 1980, L 266, str. 1.) i Direktive Vijeća 86/653/EEZ od 18. prosinca 1986. o usklađivanju prava država članica u vezi samozaposlenih trgovačkih zastupnika (SL L 382, str. 17.) (SL, posebno izdanje na hrvatskom jeziku, poglavlje 6., svezak 10., str. 45.) — Stranačka sloboda izbora prava — Granice — Ugovor o trgovačkom zastupanju — Klauzula koja kao mjerodavno pravo određuje zakon države nalogodavca — Mjesna nadležnost suda u mjestu poslovnog nastana trgovačkog zastupnika
 Izreka
 Članak 3. i članak 7. stavak 2. Rimske konvencije o mjerodavnom pravu za ugovorne obveze, otvorene za potpisivanje u Rimu 19. lipnja 1980. treba tumačiti tako da pravo države članice Europske unije koje pruža minimalnu zaštitu propisanu Direktivom Vijeća 86/653/EEZ od 18. prosinca 1986. o usklađivanju prava država članica u vezi samozaposlenih trgovačkih zastupnika, a koje su izabrale stranke ugovora o trgovačkom zastupanju, sud sa sjedištem u drugoj državi članici kod kojeg je podnesena tužba može odbaciti u korist lex fori u slučajevima obrazloženja prisilnim karakterom pravila koja uređuju položaj samozaposlenih trgovačkih zastupnika u pravnom poretku te države članice, samo ako sud kojem je tužba podnesena detaljno utvrdi da je zakonodavac države suda lex fori u okviru prenošenja ove Direktive smatrao nužnim trgovačkom zastupniku u predmetnom pravnom poretku pružiti zaštitu koja premašuje onu koja je predviđena navedenom direktivom, uzimajući pritom u obzir narav i predmet tih prisilnih propisa.
 (1) SL C 200, 7.7.2012.


text:
27.5.2000 FI Euroopan yhteisöjen virallinen lehti C 149/35
 Kantajan esittämät oikeudelliset perusteet ja pääasialliset perus- Riidanalaisella asetuksella on muutettu täysin aiemmin voi-
 telut vastaavat niitä, jotka on esitetty asioissa T-186/97, (1) massa ollutta luokittelua. Sillä jätetään nimikkeen 2001 90 50
 T-187/97, T-191/97, T-192/97, T-210/97 ja T-211/97. soveltamisalan ulkopuolelle etikassa säilötyt sienet, joiden
 suolapitoisuus ylittää 2,5 prosenttia, vaikka suola lisätään
 ainoastaan valmistusta eikä säilytystä varten. Näihin tuotteisiin
 (1) EYVL C 318, 18.10.1997, s. 17.
 sovelletaan siis paljon epäedullisempaa, yhdistetyn nimik-
 keistön nimikkeen 2003 10 mukaista tariffijärjestelmää.
 Vaatimustensa tueksi kantaja väittää seuraavaa:
 – Komissio ei ole ollut toimivaltainen EY:n perustamissopi-
 muksen 26 artiklan perusteella.
 – Riidanalaisen asetuksen perustana olevan asetuksen N:o
 2658/87 9 artiklaa on rikottu ja sovellettu virheellisesti,
 I.P.O.S.E.A. di Giusto Masiello & Figlin 8.3.2000 Euroopan koska siinä säädetty komission toimivalta on täytäntöön-
 yhteisöjen komissiota vastaan nostama kanne panoon liittyvää toimivaltaa, jota ei voida käyttää tavaroi-
 den tariffijärjestelmää koskevien perustavanlaatuisten
 säännösten muuttamiseen. Tässä eivät täyty myöskään
 (Asia T-49/00) edellytykset, joilla voitaisiin perustella voimassa olevien
 säännösten muuttamista.
 (2000/C 149/67)
 – Yhdenvertaisen kohtelun periaatetta on loukattu, koska
 uuden asetuksen mukaan etikassa säilöttyjen sellaisten
 sienten tuottajien ja maahantuojien, jotka on valmistettu
 (Oikeudenkäyntikieli: italia) korkeaa suolapitoisuutta käyttäen, on kannettava koko
 vastuu.
 I.P.O.S.E.A. on nostanut 8.3.2000 Euroopan yhteisöjen ensim-
 mäisen oikeusasteen tuomioistuimessa kanteen Euroopan yh- Kantaja väittää myös, että riidanalainen asetus on
 teisöjen komissiota vastaan. Kantajan edustajina ovat asianaja- riittämättömästi ja ristiriitaisesti perusteltu ja että se on myös
 jat Andrea Guarino ja Alain Lorang, Rooma ja Luxemburg. suhteellisuusperiaatteen sekä luottamuksensuojan periaatteen
 vastainen.
 Kantaja vaatii, että ensimmäisen oikeusasteen tuomioistuin
 (1) EYVL L 321, 14.12.1999, s. 3.
 (2) EYVL L 170, 28.6.1997, s. 13.
 – kumoaa komission asetuksen N:o 2626/99;
 – velvoittaa komission korvaamaan oikeudenkäyntikulut.
 Oikeudelliset perusteet ja pääasialliset perustelut
 Asian kantaja on yhtiö, joka tuo elintarvikkeiksi tarkoitettuja Dalmine SpA:n 8.3.2000 Euroopan yhteisöjen komissiota
 säilykevihanneksia, ja se riitauttaa tariffi- ja tilastonimik- vastaan nostama kanne
 keistöstä ja yhteisestä tullitariffista annetun neuvoston asetuk-
 sen (ETY) N:o 2658/87 liitteen I muuttamisesta 13 päivänä (Asia T-50/00)
 joulukuuta 1999 annetun komission asetuksen (EY) N:o
 2626/1999. (1) Yksi asetuksessa tarkoitetuista tuotteista ovat
 agaricus-lajikkeen keitetyt, etikassa säilötyt sienet. Näihin sie- (2000/C 149/68)
 niin lisätään suolaa, jolloin suolapitoisuus on 15–25 pro-
 senttia.
 (Oikeudenkäyntikieli: italia)
 Yhdistetystä nimikkeistöstä annetun asetuksen N:o 2658/87
 mukaan agaricuslajikkeen sienisäilykkeet saattoivat kuulua Dalmine SpA on nostanut 8.3.2000 Euroopan yhteisöjen
 kolmeen eri nimikkeeseen. Tiettyjen tavaroiden luokittelusta ensimmäisen oikeusasteen tuomioistuimessa kanteen Euroo-
 yhdistettyyn nimikkeistöön 27 päivänä kesäkuuta 1997 anne- pan yhteisöjen komissiota vastaan. Kantajan edustajina ovat
 tulla komission asetuksella (EY) N:o 1196/97 (2) oli tarkoitus asianajajat Mario Siragusa (Rooma) ja Francesca Maria Moretti
 ratkaista tämä ongelma. (Venezia).
 ---pagebreak--- C 149/36 FI Euroopan yhteisöjen virallinen lehti 27.5.2000
 Kantaja vaatii, että ensimmäisen oikeusasteen tuomioistuin Mario Costacurtan 23.3.2000 Euroopan yhteisöjen komis-
 siota vastaan nostama kanne
 – kumoaa kokonaisuudessaan 8.12.1998 tehdyn komission
 päätöksen IV/E-1/35.860-B – Tubi d’acciaio senza saldatu-
 ra (hitsaamattomat teräsputket); (Asia T-51/00)
 – kumoaa komission kantajalle määräämät sakot tai alentaa
 niitä (toissijainen vaatimus); (2000/C 149/69)
 – velvoittaa komission korvaamaan kantajan oikeudenkäyn-
 tikulut.
 (Oikeudenkäyntikieli: ranska)
 Oikeudelliset perusteet ja pääasialliset perustelut
 Mario Costacurta, kotipaikka Luxemburg, on nostanut
 Kantajan katsotaan tehneen eurooppalaisten ja japanilaisten 23.3.2000 Euroopan yhteisöjen ensimmäisen oikeusasteen
 teräsputkien tuottajien kanssa nk. Club Eurooppa-Japanin tuomioistuimessa kanteen Euroopan yhteisöjen komissiota
 piirissä sopimuksen, jossa määrätään muun muassa standardi- vastaan. Kantajan edustajana on asianajaja Marc Petit, Luxem-
 kierteisten OCTG-putkien (Oil Country Tubular Goods – burg.
 öljyntuottajamaiden putkistotuotteet) ja ”linepipe” -projektin
 kansallisten markkinoiden suojaamisesta. Lisäksi kantajan kat-
 sotaan tehneen yksinomaan eurooppalaisten tuottajien kanssa Kantaja vaatii, että ensimmäisen oikeusasteen tuomioistuin:
 toisen sopimuksen, joka koskee sileäpintaisten OCTG -putkien
 British Steelille tehtävien toimitusten jakamista sopimuspuol-
 ten kesken. – kumoaa implisiittisen päätöksen, jossa nimittävä viran-
 omainen hylkää kantajan tekemän valituksen nimittävän
 viranomaisen päätöksestä, jonka mukaan kantaja on nimi-
 Väitteidensä tueksi kantaja vetoaa seuraaviin seikkoihin: tetty 1.9.1996 alkaen OPOCE:n suunnittelun, sopimusten
 ja yleisten toimintojen yksikköön Luxemburgiin;
 – Hallinnollisessa menettelyvaiheessa on toimittu menette-
 lysääntöjen vastaisesti, koska tiettyjä komission kantajalle
 tutkintavaiheessa esittämiä kysymyksiä ei voida pitää – kumoaa Euroopan yhteisöjen virallisten julkaisujen toimis-
 hyväksyttävinä. Menettelysääntöjä on rikottu myös luotta- ton nimittävän viranomaisen 15.5.1998 tekemän päätök-
 muksellisuuskysymysten laiminlyönnin vuoksi sekä siksi, sen, jossa se on määrännyt kantajan myynti ja tekijänoi-
 että päätöksen perusteena käytetyt asiakirjat eivät täysin keuksien hallintoyksikköön Luxemburgiin, koska päätök-
 vastaa väitetiedoksiantoon liitettyjä asiakirjoja. sestä ei ole tehty asiakirjaa tai päätös on sääntöjenvastainen;
 – Perustamissopimuksen 81 artiklaa on rikottu myös sen – velvoittaa Euroopan yhteisöjen komission korvaamaan
 vuoksi, että kantajan perusteltuja odotuksia siitä, että kaikki tässä oikeusasteessa aiheutuneet oikeudenkäynti-
 riidanalaiseen päätökseen otetaan tosiseikkojen kuvaus, kulut;
 jota ei ollut esitetty väitetiedoksiannossa, on loukattu.
 – Päätöksen perustelut ovat puutteelliset ja ristiriitaiset seu- – pidättää kantajalle oikeuden vedota kaikkiin muihin oi-
 raavien seikkojen osalta. Markkinoita ja Dalminen markki- keuksiin, velvollisuuksiin, perusteisiin ja toimiin etenkin
 nakäyttäytymistä koskeva tutkimus on suoritettu perusta- niiltä osin kuin on kyse vahingonkorvauksesta.
 missopimuksen 81 artiklan vastaisesti kuten myös Yhdisty-
 neeseen kuningaskuntaan suoritettavia toimituksia koske-
 vien sopimusten lainvastaisuuden selvittäminen ja Club
 Eurooppa-Japanin piirissä tehdyn sopimuksella asetettujen Oikeudelliset perusteet ja pääasialliset perustelut
 rajoitusten arviointi.
 Yhdistyneeseen kuningaskuntaan suoritettavia toimituksia kos- Kantaja valittaa komission päätöksestä, jossa se on hylännyt
 kevien sopimusten osalta kantaja täsmentää, että British Steelin kantajan 20.7.1999 esittämän vaatimuksen siitä, että hänelle
 kanssa tehty sopimus koskee suurimmaksi osaksi tuotteita, toimitettaisiin tiedonanto sellaisesta virallisesta päätöksestä,
 jotka eivät kuulu relevantteihin markkinoihin sellaisina kuin jonka mukaan hänet on siirretty 1.9.1996 alkaen Euroopan
 komissio on ne määritellyt, eikä sopimus perustu eurooppalais- yhteisöjen virallisten julkaisujen toimistoon Luxemburgiin;
 ten tuottajien kanssa tehtyyn sopimukseen. Lisäksi kantaja
 toteaa, ettei se ole mukana muiden eurooppalaisten tuottajien
 kanssa horisontaalisessa sopimuksessa, jolla Yhdistyneeseen Kantaja vetoaa kanteensa tueksi siihen, että edellä mainittu
 kuningaskuntaan suoritettavat toimitukset jaettaisiin. siirtopäätös:
 – rikkoo henkilöstösääntöjen 2,3 ja 25 artiklaa;


type: other

text:
Lääne-Nigula valla koolieelsetes munitsipaallasteasutustes vanemate poolt kaetava osa määr ja tasumine – Riigi Teataja
 Lääne-Nigula valla koolieelsetes munitsipaallasteasutustes vanemate poolt kaetava osa määr ja tasumine
 Lääne-Nigula valla koolieelsetes munitsipaallasteasutustes vanemate poolt kaetava osa määr ja tasumine - sisukord
 § 2 Osalustasu määr
 § 4 Vanemate poolt kaetava osa soodustuste määrad
 § 5 Võlgnevused
 RT IV, 24.05.2017, 9
 Vastu võetud 25.03.2014 nr 23
 RT IV, 03.04.2014, 6
 18.05.2017 RT IV, 24.05.2017, 1 27.05.2017
 (1) Käesolev määrus reguleerib Lääne-Nigula valla koolieelsetes munitsipaallasteasutustes (edaspidi lasteasutus) kulude (majandamiskulud, personali töötasu ja sotsiaalmaks ning õppevahendite kulud) vanemate poolt kaetava osa (edaspidi osalustasu) määra kehtestamist ja tasumise korda.
 (2) Määruses kasutatakse mõistet suvine valverühm – lasteaia rühm, mis avatakse lasteaedade suvise kinni oleku ajal ja kuhu võetakse lasteaedades juba kohta kasutavaid lapsi vanema avalduse alusel.
 [RT IV, 24.05.2017, 1 - jõust. 27.05.2017]
 § 2. Osalustasu määr
 Osalustasu määr on ühe lapse kohta summa, mis moodustab 7 % Eesti Vabariigi Valitsuse kehtestatud palga alammäärast kuus.
 (1) Osalustasu maksmise kohustus algab päevast, mil jõustub lapse lasteasutuse nimekirja arvamine ehk päevast, mil lapsel tekib õigus minna lasteaeda ja lõpeb lapse lasteasutuse nimekirjast väljaarvamise päevast. Kui laps arvatakse lasteaia nimekirja enne jooksva kuu 15. kuupäeva, siis tasutakse vastava kuu osalustasu täies ulatuses. Kui laps arvatakse lasteaia nimekirja pärast 15. kuupäeva, siis tasutakse vastava kuu osalustasu pooles ulatuses.
 (2) Osalustasu tuleb vanemal tasuda kohta kasutava lapse nimel eelmise kuu eest (aluseks koha kasutamise tabel) jooksval kuul Lääne-Nigula Vallavalitsuse eelarve ja raamatupidamise osakonna poolt esitatud arvete alusel Lääne-Nigula Vallavalitsuse pangakontole või sularahas 15. kuupäevaks.
 (4) Lasteasutuse ajutise sulgemise ajal (ruumide remont, töötajate kollektiivpuhkus), mis vältab rohkem kui 2 nädalat, tasutakse osalustasu proportsionaalselt lasteasutuse lahtioleku ajale.
 (5) Osalustasu suvise valverühma kasutamise eest tuleb vanemal tasuda ettemaksuna 25. juuniks terve valverühma töötamise perioodi eest, sõltumata sellest, mitu päeva laps suvises valverühmas kohta kasutab. Lasteaia direktor esitab suvise valverühma osalustasu tabeli eelarve ja raamatupidamise osakonnale 10. juuniks.
 (6) Toidukulu päevamaksumus suvises valverühmas moodustab laste toitlustamisele kulunud toiduainete/toitlustamisteenuse maksumus. Toitlustamiskulu tuleb vanematel tasuda kohta kasutava lapse nimel eelmise kuu eest jooksval kuul Lääne-Nigula Vallavalitsuse eelarve ja raamatupidamise osakonna poolt esitatud arve alusel Lääne-Nigula Vallavalitsuse pangakontole või sularahas 15. kuupäevaks.
 § 4. Vanemate poolt kaetava osa soodustuste määrad
 (1) Kui lapse ja vähemalt ühe tema vanema elukoht on Lääne-Nigula vallas siis kehtib alljärgnev soodusosalustasu:
 1) 5% palga alammäärast kuus, kui lasteaias käib üks laps;
 2) kui ühest perekonnast käib lasteaias 2 last, siis teise lapse eest makstakse 3,5 % palga alammäärast kuus;
 3) kui ühest perekonnast käib lasteaias kolm või enam alaealist last, siis kolmas ja iga järgnev laps on osalustasust vabastatud.
 (2) Lõikes 1 nimetatud soodustuse saamiseks lapsevanem avaldust esitama ei pea.
 (3) Lõikes 1 nimetatud soodustused laienevad nende kohaliku omavalitsuse üksuste lastele, kes sõlmivad Lääne-Nigula vallaga sellekohase lepingu.
 (4) Soodustuse saamisest avalduse esitajat kirjalikult ei informeerita. Soodustuse saamisest keeldumisest teatatakse otsuse tegemisest 5 tööpäeva jooksul.
 (5) Soodustuse andmine lõpetatakse, kui lapse või vanema elukoht registreeritakse Eesti Rahvastikuregistris teise omavalitsusse.
 § 5. Võlgnevused
 Osalustasu võlgnevuse korral toimub lasteasutusest väljaarvamine Lääne-Nigula Vallavalitsuse poolt kehtestatud korras.
 (1) (Käesolevast tekstist välja jäetud)
 (2) Määrus jõustub 1. septembril 2014.a.