text:
Ultimele stiri despre CSS6 Bucureşti - sporttim.ro
 Arhiva etichetelor: CSS6 Bucureşti
 Publicat în Badminton, Sport juvenil | Etichete Alexandra Haranguş, Andra Olariu, badminton, CSM Timişoara, CSS6 Bucureşti, Daniel Popescu, Gabriela Szabo, Galerie foto, Paul Hărănguş, sport, U13, U19 | Comentariile sunt închise pentru FOTO. CSM Timișoara, medalii cu vârf și îndesat de toate culorile în București, la Campionatul Național U19 și U13
 CSM Timișoara, 4 locuri pe podium la Cupa României, în București. Și mai multe la Cupa de toamnă – Deva
 vineri 6 Noi 2015, de webmaster
 CSM Timișoara a concurat pe două planuri, la Cupa României sub 17 ani, găzduită de CSȘ6 București, respectiv la ”Cupa de toamnă - Deva 2015”.
 Publicat în Badminton | Etichete badminton, CSS6 Bucureşti, Cupa de Toamnă Deva 2015, Cupa României U17, Daniel Popescu, sport | Comentariile sunt închise pentru CSM Timișoara, 4 locuri pe podium la Cupa României, în București. Și mai multe la Cupa de toamnă – Deva
 CSM Timișoara, două locuri 3 în București, la Campionatul Național U17. FOTO!
 CSM Timișoara a adunat în weekend 3 medalii de bronz la Campionatul Național de badminton rezervat juniorilor sub 17 ani, în proba de dublu băieți, prin Daniel Popescu și Paul Hărănguș, și una la simplu, prin Daniel Popescu.
 Publicat în Badminton, Sport juvenil | Etichete Alexandra Haranguş, Alexandra Soare, AS Valahia București, Asociația Sportivă Aztek București, badminton, CN U17 badminton, Cristina Soare, CS Siderurgistul Galați, CSM Timişoara, CSS Oneşti, CSS4 Bucureşti, CSS6 Bucureşti, CSU Galaţi, Daniel Popescu, FRB, Galerie foto, Palatul Naţional al Copiilor Bucureşti, Paul Hărănguş, sport | Lasă un comentariu
 GALERIE FOTO. Medaliaţii „Cupei Bega U13”, la Timişoara, în primul concurs pe 2015
 luni 23 Feb 2015, de Mihai Comşulea
 Au mai rămas trei săptămâni şi jumătate până la Internaţionalele de Badminton ale României din sala “Constantin Jude” din Timişoara dar până atunci să notăm câteva detalii de la prima întrecere a sezonului competiţional 2015, ce a avut loc în weekend, tot pe malurile Begăi. În fotografie, cei 3 medaliaţi timişoreni împreună cu antrenorii Corina Dan şi Ştefan Nyari.
 Publicat în Badminton, Sport juvenil | Etichete Aztek Bucureşti, badminton, CSM Timişoara, CSS6 Bucureşti, Cupa Bega U13, juniori, sala sport Ferdinand I, sport | Lasă un comentariu
 Andra Olariu (CSM Timișoara), dublă campioană națională de juniori sub 17 ani, depășind în două finale favorita numărul 1
 Încă un weekend de succes pentru badmintonista timișoreancă Andra Olariu, favorită numărul 2 în Campionatul Național de juniori sub 17 ani disputat în sala liceului CSȘ6 București din Sectorul 4, unde a câștigat proba de simplu fete, încheind pe pozițiile 1 și 3 la dublu, feminin respectiv mixt.
 Publicat în Badminton, Sport juvenil | Etichete Andra Olariu, CN badminton U17, CSM Timişoara, CSS6 Bucureşti, Daniel Popescu, dublu mixt, Florentin Gîscă, Irina Călin, Mădălina Ilie, sport | Lasă un comentariu
 Și timișoreni la cursul de perfecționare din București condus de Gunther Huber, director de dezvoltare în departamentul de profil al Federației Mondiale de Badminton
 Badmintonul timișorean a avut zilele trecute reprezentanții săi, dintre antrenori, între cei peste 20 din toată țara, dar și jucători, la un curs de perfecționare al tehnicienilor din această disciplină, condus de un reputat coordonator în domeniu.
 În perioada 24-28 ...
 Publicat în Badminton | Etichete badminton, Corina Dan, CSS6 Bucureşti, curs de perfecționare antrenori badminton, Gunther Huber, sport, Ştefan Nyari | Lasă un comentariu
 Rodica Haranguş: “Experienţa austriacă ne dă de gândit ce facem pe viitor”
 marți 1 Iul 2014, de Mihai Comşulea
 Utilă prezenţă şi plină de învăţăminte pentru juniori ai Timişoarei, de la Clubul Sportiv Municipal, la o competiţie internaţională găzduită de bastionul badmintonului austriac, Pressbaum, loc din care sportivii bănăţeni revin mereu cu experienţe benefice, loc în care Sonia Olariu devenea campioană naţională a ţării alpine, drept componentă a echipei locale...
 Publicat în Badminton, Sport juvenil | Etichete Adam Szolc, Alexandra Haranguş, Alexandra Soare, Andrei Badea, badminton, CSM Timişoara, CSS Oneşti, CSS6 Bucureşti, Cupa Dunării badminton, Daniel Popescu, Maria Duţu, Paul Hărănguş, Pecs Campus, Pressbaum, Reka Madarasz, Rodica Hărănguș, sport | Lasă un comentariu
 Cu peste 20 de medalii obţinute la “Cupa Copşa Mică”, badmintoniştii lui CSM Timişoara iau acum calea Austriei
 joi 26 Iun 2014, de Mihai Comşulea
 Încărcaţi de medalii la cea de-a cincea ediţie a reuniunii amicilor badmintonului de la Copşa Mică, sportivii de la CSM Timişoara se gătesc de o tradiţională descindere la Pressbaum, punct de reper în sportul la fileu austriac, unde Sonia Olariu devenea campioană naţională a Austriei în întrecerea pe echipe, cu clubul local.
 Publicat în Badminton | Etichete Alexandra Haranguş, Alexandra Soare, Alin Popescu, Andrei Badea, AS Copşa Mică, badminton, Corina Dan, CS Preventis Iaşi, CSM Timişoara, CSS Oneşti, CSS6 Bucureşti, CSU Galaţi, Cupa Copşa Mică, Daniel Popescu, Magda Lozniceriu, Maria Duţu, Mihai Macarei, Paul Hărănguş, Pressbaum, Sonia Olariu, sport, Ştefan Nyari, www.mirceahodarnau.ro | Lasă un comentariu
 CSM Timișoara își păstrează titlul național pe echipe la U19 iar Sabina Băluț și Andreas Thiel cuceresc Cupa României
 CSM Timișoara a cîștigat pe teren propriu Campionatul Național pe echipe sub 19 ani, păstrînd titlul pe malurile Begăi, iar 2 dintre componenții săi, Andreas Thiel (foto), la simplu băieți, respectiv Sabina Băluț, la dublu mixt, împreună cu Alexandru Blăniță, s-au impus în întrecerea individuală disputată cu aceeași ocazie în sala de sport a Colegiului Tehnic ”Ferdinand I”, dotată cu Cupa României.
 Publicat în Badminton, Exclusiv | Etichete Andra Olariu, Andreas Thiel, Ariana Prodan, CN badminton U19, CSM Timişoara, CSS Bacău, CSS6 Bucureşti, Galaţi, Marius Corciuc, Politehnica Iaşi, rezultate, Sabina Băluţ, sport, sporttim, Ştefan Nyari | Lasă un comentariu
 GALERIE FOTO. CSM Timişoara, locurile 2 şi 3 la „Memorialul Rotaru”, în Bucureşti. Urmează Cupa României şi Campionatul Naţional pe echipe de 19 ani, la „Ferdinand I”
 luni 10 Iun 2013, de Mihai Comşulea
 Alexandra Soare s-a clasat a doua la categoria 11 ani iar perechea Mark Muller - Daniel Popescu pe 3 la dublu sub 15 ani, în cadrul "Memorialului Rotaru", găzduit în week-end de CSŞ6 Bucureşti, ca primă "ieşire" a badmintonului timişorean la concursuri în ţară din februarie încoace, şi în condiţiile în care oraşul nostru a găzduit în primăvară numeroase competiţii la fileu, următoarea, la Colegiul Tehnic "Ferdinand I", urmînd a avea loc de vineri pînă duminică: Cupa României şi Campionatul Naţional pe echipe de 19 ani.
 Publicat în Badminton, Sport juvenil | Etichete Alexandra Soare, Alexandru Blăniţă, Anca Ciura, Andra Olariu, Andreas Thiel, Ariana Prodan, badminton, Banu Sport, CN echipe U19, Cristina Soare, CSM Timişoara, CSS Oneşti, CSŞ1 Timişoara, CSS6 Bucureşti, Cupa României, Daniel Popescu, Denisa Stemate, Eduard Dusnoki, FRB, Fundaţia Rudolf Walther, Kuala Lumpur, Maria Tănăsie, Mark Muller, rezultate, Sabina Băluţ, Shuttle Time, sport, sporttim, Teodora Laşac, U11, U15, U19 | Lasă un comentariu
 LPS tare, pe 4, dar şi cu gust amar: împotriva a 15 în loc de 14!?
 joi 21 Iun 2012, de webmaster
 Într-un foarte rar moment în care a magnetizat găzduirea unui turneu final naţional pe semicercuri, Timişoara handbalistică juvenilă a dovedit că, în ciuda slăbiciunilor echipelor locale de senioare, încă are potenţial pentru schimbul de mîine şi încă modelează promiţătoare talente, LPS Banatul încheind în imediata vecinătate a podiumului dintre cele mai bune 12 formaţii din ţară la nivelul junioarelor IV, cu un total de 4 succese şi două eşecuri în jocurile derulate de vineri pînă duminică în "Banu Sport" şi "Constantin Jude", dar întrebîndu-se totodată cu un amar gust la finele competiţiei adjudecate de Corona Braşov, pepinieră a unei prim-divizionare, de ce a avut de suferit o discriminare generată de injusteţea unor oficiali pe seama faptului de a nu fi bănuiţi cumva de partizanat în favoarea gazdelor, cum se poartă pe alte meleaguri autohtone. Vom reveni şi cu alte consideraţii şi fotografii de la turneul final.
 Publicat în Handbal, Juniori | Etichete AJH Timiş, AS OK Sport Şcoala 1 Oneşti, Corona Braşov, CS Diniăşanca Diniaş, CSM Ploieşti, CSS Cluj, CSS Tulcea, CSS1 Constanţa, CSS4 Bucureşti, CSS6 Bucureşti, Fîşcu, Florica Gallovits, FRH, handbal junioare, junioare IV, LPS Banatul Timişoara, LPS Slatina, Negoiţă, sport | Lasă un comentariu
 Băluţ, două titluri, şi CSS1 Timişoara prima pe ţară la U19
 CSŞ 1 Timisoara a cîştigat locul I şi implicit Campionatul Naţional pe echipe de juniori sub 19 ani, întrecere ce a avut loc în week-end în sala Banu Sport. În 20 de ani, din 1993 şi pînă în prezent, sportivii timişoreni au cîştigat această competiţie de 11 ori, fiind vorba despre un concurs iniţiat acum două decenii de S.C. Stimel SA, care a sponsorizat Federaţia Română de Badminton cu o cupă transmisibilă pentru echipe de juniori U 19. Componenţa echipei învingătoare este Sabina Băluţ, Alexandra Ştefan, Andra Olariu, Ariana Prodan, Alexandra şi Ana-Maria Pup, Dan Ilin, Eduard Dusnoki şi Andreas Thiel.
 Publicat în Badminton | Etichete Andra Olariu, badminton, Banu Sport, CN Echipe, Corina Dan, CSS Bacău, CSŞ1 Timişoara, CSS6 Bucureşti, juniori U19, Sabina Băluţ, sport, Ştefan Nyari, Timişoara | Lasă un comentariu
 Marius Corciuc se impune la „Cupa Timişoara”
 luni 20 Iun 2011, de Mihai Comşulea
 Nu mare este familia badmintonului timişorean şi românesc în întregul său, dar 20 de băieţi şi 15 fete s-au aliniat la prima ediţie a "Cupei Timişoara", care deşi n-a beneficiat de prezenţa Soniei Olariu, campioană naţională en-titre, reţinută de examenele majoratului, a oferit dispute interesante şi un câştigător localnic, Marius Corciuc (în foto), al probei de simplu masculin.
 Publicat în Badminton | Etichete badminton, Banu Sport, CSM Oneşti, CSŞ 1 Timişoara, CSS6 Bucureşti, Cupa Timişoara, Florin Posteucă, Marius Corciuc, Sonia Olariu, sport | Lasă un comentariu


type: contracts

jurisdiction: EU

text:
 Avis juridique important
 |
 22001A1227(06)
 Agreement between the European Community and the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia on reciprocal preferential trade concessions for certain wines
 Official Journal L 342 , 27/12/2001 P. 0029 - 0030
 AGREEMENTbetween the European Community and the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia on reciprocal preferential trade concessions for certain wines1. Imports into the Community of the following products originating in the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia shall be subject to the concessions set out below:>TABLE>2. The Community shall grant a preferential zero-duty within tariff quotas as mentioned under point 1, subject to the condition that no export subsidies shall be paid for exports of these quantities by the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia.3. Imports into the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia of the following products originating in the Community shall be subject to the concessions set out below:>TABLE>4. The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia shall grant a preferential zero-duty within tariff quotas as mentioned under point 3, subject to the condition that no export subsidies shall be paid for exports of these quantities by the Community.5. This Agreement shall cover wine:(a) which has been produced from fresh grapes wholly produced and harvested in the territory of the Contracting Party in question, and(b) (i) originating in the European Union, which has been produced in accordance with the rules governing the oenological practices and processes referred to in Title V of Council Regulation (EC) No 1493/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in wine(1);(ii) originating in the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, which has been produced in accordance with the rules governing the oenological practices and processes in conformity with the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia law. These oenological rules referred to shall be in conformity with Community legislation.6. Imports of wine under the concessions provided in this Agreement will be subject to the presentation of a certificate issued by a mutually recognised official body appearing on the lists drawn up jointly, to the effect that the wine in question complies with point 5(b).7. The Contracting Parties shall examine no later than in the first quarter of 2005 the opportunities for granting each other further concessions taking into account the development of wine trade between the Contracting Parties.8. The Contracting Parties shall ensure that the benefits granted reciprocally are not called into question by other measures.9. Consultations are to take place at the request of either Contracting Party on any problem relating to the way this Agreement operates.10. This Agreement shall apply, on the one hand, in the territories in which the Treaty establishing the European Community is applied and under the conditions laid down in that Treaty and, on the other hand, in the territory of the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia.(1) OJ L 179, 14.7.1999, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2826/2000 (OJ L 328, 23.12.2000, p. 2).


text:
 10.4.2008
 HU
 Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja
 L 100/89
 AZ EGT VEGYES BIZOTTSÁG
 145/2007 határozata
 (2007. október 26.)
 az EGT-megállapodás XIII. mellékletének (Közlekedés) módosításáról
 AZ EGT VEGYES BIZOTTSÁG,
 tekintettel az Európai Gazdasági Térségről szóló megállapodás kiigazításáról szóló jegyzőkönyvvel módosított, az Európai Gazdasági Térségről szóló megállapodásra (a továbbiakban: a megállapodás) és különösen annak 98. cikkére,
 mivel:
 (1)
 A megállapodás XIII. mellékletét a 2007. szeptember 28-i 122/2007 EGT vegyes bizottsági határozat (1) módosította.
 (2)
 A Közösségen belül működési tilalom alá tartozó légi fuvarozók közösségi listájának elfogadásáról és az üzemeltető fuvarozó kiléte tekintetében a légi közlekedés utasainak tájékoztatásáról, valamint a 2004/36/EK irányelv 9. cikkének hatályon kívül helyezéséről szóló, 2005. december 14-i 2111/2005/EK európai parlamenti és tanácsi rendeletet (2) bele kell foglalni a megállapodásba.
 (3)
 A Közösségen belül működési tilalom alá tartozó légi fuvarozóknak a 2111/2005/EK európai parlamenti és tanácsi rendelet II. fejezetében említett közösségi listája végrehajtási szabályainak megállapításáról szóló, 2006. március 22-i 473/2006/EK bizottsági rendeletet (3) bele kell foglalni a megállapodásba.
 (4)
 A Közösségen belül működési tilalom alá tartozó légi fuvarozóknak a 2111/2005/EK európai parlamenti és tanácsi rendelet II. fejezetében említett közösségi listájának létrehozásáról szóló, 2006. március 22-i 474/2006/EK bizottsági rendeletet (4) bele kell foglalni a megállapodásba.
 (5)
 A Közösségen belül működési tilalom alá tartozó légi fuvarozóknak a 2111/2005/EK európai parlamenti és tanácsi rendelet II. fejezetében említett közösségi listájának létrehozásáról szóló 474/2006/EK bizottsági rendelet módosításáról szóló, 2006. június 20-i 910/2006/EK bizottsági rendeletet (5) bele kell foglalni a megállapodásba.
 (6)
 A 910/2006/EK rendelet által módosított, a Közösségen belül működési tilalom alá tartozó légi fuvarozóknak a 2111/2005/EK rendelet II. fejezetében említett közösségi listájának létrehozásáról szóló 474/2006/EK rendelet módosításáról szóló, 2006. október 12-i 1543/2006/EK bizottsági rendeletet (6) bele kell foglalni a megállapodásba.
 (7)
 A Közösségen belül működési tilalom alá tartozó légi fuvarozók közösségi listájának létrehozásáról szóló 474/2006/EK rendelet módosításáról szóló, 2007. március 5-i 235/2007/EK bizottsági rendeletet (7) bele kell foglalni a megállapodásba.
 (8)
 A Közösségen belül működési tilalom alá tartozó légi fuvarozók közösségi listájának létrehozásáról szóló 474/2006/EK bizottsági rendelet módosításáról szóló, 2007. július 4-i 787/2007/EK bizottsági rendeletet (8) bele kell foglalni a megállapodásba,
 A KÖVETKEZŐKÉPPEN HATÁROZOTT:
 1. cikk
 A megállapodás XIII. melléklete a következőképpen módosul:
 1.
 A 66z. pont (2006/23/EK európai parlamenti és tanácsi irányelv) után a következő pontokat kell beilleszteni:
 „66za.
 32005 R 2111: az Európai Parlament és a Tanács 2005. december 14-i 2111/2005/EK rendelete a Közösségen belül működési tilalom alá tartozó légi fuvarozók közösségi listájának elfogadásáról és az üzemeltető fuvarozó kiléte tekintetében a légi közlekedés utasainak tájékoztatásáról, valamint a 2004/36/EK irányelv 9. cikkének hatályon kívül helyezéséről (HL L 344., 2005.12.27., 15. o.).
 A rendelet rendelkezéseit e megállapodás alkalmazásában a következő kiigazításokkal kell értelmezni:
 a)
 a közösségi lista aktualizálásainak a megállapodásba történő belefoglalásáról szóló hivatalos EGT vegyes bizottsági határozatnak a megállapodásban meghatározott eljárásokkal összhangban történő elfogadásáig az EFTA-államok az EK-tagállamokkal egy időben olyan intézkedéseket hoznak, amelyek az utóbbiak által a működési tilalom alá tartozó légi fuvarozók közösségi listája alapján tett intézkedésekhez kapcsolódnak;
 b)
 abban az esetben, ha az ilyen intézkedések egy vagy több EFTA-államban komoly kétségeket keltenek, az érintett EFTA-állam(ok) késedelem nélkül az EGT Vegyes Bizottsághoz fordul(nak);
 c)
 a 15. cikk a következő bekezdéssel egészül ki:
 »6. Az EFTA-államok teljes mértékben részt vesznek az (1) bekezdésben említett bizottság munkájában, kivéve a szavazás jogát.«
 66zaa.
 32006 R 0473: a Bizottság 2006. március 22-i 473/2006/EK rendelete a Közösségen belül működési tilalom alá tartozó légi fuvarozóknak a 2111/2005/EK európai parlamenti és tanácsi rendelet II. fejezetében említett közösségi listája végrehajtási szabályainak megállapításáról (HL L 84., 2006.3.23., 8. o.).
 66zab.
 32006 R 0474: a Bizottság 2006. március 22-i 474/2006/EK rendelete a Közösségen belül működési tilalom alá tartozó légi fuvarozóknak a 2111/2005/EK európai parlamenti és tanácsi rendelet II. fejezetében említett közösségi listájának létrehozásáról (HL L 84., 2006.3.23., 14. o.), az alábbi módosításokkal:
 —
 32006 R 0910: a Bizottság 2006. június 20-i 910/2006/EK rendelete (HL L 168., 2006.6.21., 16. o.),
 —
 32006 R 1543: a Bizottság 2006. október 12-i 1543/2006/EK rendelete (HL L 283., 2006.10.14., 27. o.),
 —
 32007 R 0235: a Bizottság 2007. március 5-i 235/2007/EK rendelete (HL L 66., 2007.3.6., 3. o.),
 —
 32007 R 0787: a Bizottság 2007. július 4-i 787/2007/EK rendelete (HL L 175., 2007.7.5., 10. o.).”
 2.
 A 66r. pont (2004/36/EK európai parlamenti és tanácsi irányelv) a következő szöveggel egészül ki:
 „az alábbi módosítással:
 —
 32005 R 2111: az Európai Parlament és a Tanács 2005. december 14-i 2111/2005/EK rendelete (HL L 344., 2005.12.27., 15. o.).”
 2. cikk
 A 2111/2005/EK, 473/2006/EK, 474/2006/EK, 910/2006/EK, 1543/2006/EK, 235/2007/EK és a 787/2007EK rendeletnek az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja EGT-kiegészítésében közzéteendő izlandi és norvég nyelvű szövege hiteles.
 3. cikk
 Ez a határozat 2007. október 27-én lép hatályba, feltéve, hogy az EGT Vegyes Bizottság a megállapodás 103. cikkének (1) bekezdésében előírt összes bejelentést megkapta (9).
 4. cikk
 Ezt a határozatot az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapjának EGT-re vonatkozó részében és EGT-kiegészítésében kell közzétenni.
 Kelt Brüsszelben, 2007. október 26-án.
 az EGT Vegyes Bizottság részéről
 az elnök
 Stefán Haukur JÓHANNESSON
 (1) HL L 47., 2008.2.21., 47. o.
 (2) HL L 344., 2005.12.27., 15. o.
 (3) HL L 84., 2006.3.23., 8. o.
 (4) HL L 84., 2006.3.23., 14. o.
 (5) HL L 168., 2006.6.21., 16. o.
 (6) HL L 283., 2006.10.14., 27. o.
 (7) HL L 66., 2007.3.6., 3. o.
 (8) HL L 175., 2007.7.5., 10. o.
 (9) Alkotmányos követelmények fennállását nem jelezték.


type: wikipedia

text:
 Tapahtumia
 15. kesäkuuta – Perustuslakien esikuvana pidetty Magna Carta laadittiin Englannissa.
 Kahdestoista ekumeeninen kirkolliskokous pidettiin Roomassa
 Pekingin alue liitettiin Mongolivaltakuntaan
 Epeiroksen despootti valtasi Makedonian
 Genovalaiset perustivat Monacon siirtokunnan uudelleen
 Pyhä Dominicus perusti dominikaanien kerjäläisveljestön
 Neljäs lateraanikonsiili hyväksyi viidennen ristiretken
 Syntyneitä
 Pyhä Celestinus V, paavi vuonna 1294 (k. 1296)
 Johannes XXI, paavi 1276–1277 (k. 1277)
 Robert Kilwardby, englantilainen kardinaali ja Canberburyn arkkipiispa (k. 1279)
 Vilhelm Moerbekelainen, arkkipiispa ja orientalisti (k. 1286)
 23. syyskuuta – Kublai-kaani, mongolivaltakunnan suurkaani ja Kiinan Yuan-dynastian perustaja (k. 1294)
 Kuolleita
 5. heinäkuuta – Eisai, japanilainen buddhalainen munkki (s. 1141)
 1210-luku


type: caselaw

jurisdiction: US

text:
This appeal is from a decree of the Circuit Court for Howard County, granting the relief prayed for, specific performance of a contract for the sale of a parcel of land. The sale was made by Alva S. Ramsburg, appellee, to Paul H. Loughran, since deceased, and whose executor, Jerome H. Loughran, was, by amendment, made a party defendant and is the appellant in this appeal. The contract between the parties, under seal, was dated the 19th day of August, 1931, and provides: "That for and in consideration of the full sum of Fifteen Hundred Dollars ($1500.00), the said parties of the first part do bargain and sell unto the said party of the second part, and the latter does hereby purchase from the former, all that piece or parcel of ground situate and lying in Howard County, Maryland, containing in the aggregate three acres of land, more or less, the lines of which are to be determined by a survey made for the parties hereto, and which said three acres of land is bound on the East by the premises of Samual A. Curran and wife, on the North by the property of the said Alva S. Ramsburg, and on the West by a private driveway entering from the Baltimore to Frederick State Road to the dwelling of the said Alva S. Ramsburg, and on the South by the Baltimore to Frederick State Road."
 There are the further provisions that a good and merchantable title, in fee simple, clear of encumbrances and liens, shall be granted and conveyed; that within a period of thirty days of the date of the signing of the agreement, such title is to be given, and that time is to be of the essence of the agreement. The contract was signed before the survey provided for therein was made.
 The objections presented for consideration were, that the description of the land was not sufficiently definite and specific; that the contract, by agreement or mutual understanding, was "called off" or abandoned; that the performance on the part of the appellee was not within the thirty days provided in the contract; and laches. We will consider these questions in the order named. *Page 184
 The property was located on the north side of the Baltimore and Frederick State Road, and it will be observed that three of the boundary lines of this land are described in the contract, and the land sold contained, in the aggregate, three acres, more or less. Thus it will be seen that three lines of the tract and the acreage are designated. The fourth line, according to the terms of the contract, was to be located and the acreage fixed by a survey. Having these three lines and the area of the lot, it was not a difficult problem to establish the fourth line, and to perfect a complete description of the property, and to lay off the acres, according to the contract, and this was done, and no question was raised as to the correctness of the second survey or the fairness in establishing the fourth line of the property. A difficulty did arise when the surveyor first undertook to lay off the property. His first survey resulted in establishing an area of five acres instead of three acres, and, after some controversy, Paul H. Loughran refused to buy the five acres and stated that he would only take the number of acres provided for in the contract. Ramsburg insisted upon his taking the five acres, which was evidently for his convenience, but Loughran refused to accede to his wishes. The contention that the land was not described with sufficient certainty cannot seriously be entertained. The parties understood when the contract was made that, in order to establish the fourth line and the acreage provided for in the contract, the services of a surveyor were necessary. These were procured and the line was ultimately established. There was only a question of measurements and mathematics involved, and both parties understood this. The lines and the property were definitely and certainly ascertained. According to the witness Curran, Loughran stated, "Well, I bargained for three acres. That is all I want and I don't want the other two." He further stated that he was willing to take the three acres, but would not take five acres. This is according to the terms of the contract and according to the understanding of the parties, as shown in the *Page 185
 testimony and the argument. A reasonable certainty in the description of property is all that is required. Miller's EquityProc., page 789. In Powell v. Moody, 153 Md. 62, 66,137 A. 477, 478, this court said: "`The description must be such as to enable the court to determine with certainty, with the aid of such extrinsic evidence as is admissible under the rules of evidence, what property was intended by the parties to be covered thereby. The description need not be given with such particularity as to make a resort to extrinsic evidence unnecessary. Reasonable certainty is all that is required.'Kraft v. Egan, 76 Md. 243, 25 A. 469; Engler v. Garrett,100 Md. 387, 59 A. 648." See, also, Helmik v. Pratt, 153 Md. 685,139 A. 559; and King v. Kaiser, 126 Md. 213, 218, 94 A. 780.
 The contention that the appellee undertook to definitely designate the fourth boundary line of the land independently of the surveyor's measurements is not supported by the testimony. The parties in interest were there and doubtless suggestions were made as to where the line should run, but none of them did, or could have done, more than offer suggestions, based upon judgment and estimates, to aid the surveyor, before the land was actually surveyed. In the discussion, Mr. Ramsburg thought that a certain piece of land designated would be about three acres. The surveyor's judgment was to the contrary, and when the land was laid off the judgment of the surveyor was justified, because it contained five acres, and, after Mr. Loughran refused to take the five acres, Mr. Taylor, the surveyor, made another survey, and this effort definitely laid off the three acres to be conveyed. From the above cases, and from the facts contained in the record, there can be no question that the written contract controls the situation, and neither party undertook to modify it or could have done so without the consent of the other.
 The contention that the contract was abandoned is based upon a conversation between Ramsburg and Paul Loughran, in which Ramsburg insisted upon Loughran *Page 186
 taking the five acres as laid off and to pay him for it $2,500, but this was not in accordance with the terms of the contract and Loughran refused to accept the five acres and to pay for it, but agreed to accept the three acres as stipulated in their agreement. There was some heated discussion, but we do not think that the position of the parties, either in law or fact, justify us in regarding the contract as having been rescinded. This was the view of the chancellor before whom the case was tried. The rule, generally stated, is that a contract may not be rescinded except by the mutual consent of both parties. It is seriously contended, however, by counsel, that a contract in writing, and required to be so under the law, cannot be rescinded except by an instrument of equal dignity. Spellman v. Dundalk Co.,164 Md. 465, 165 A. 192; Abrams v. Eckenrode, 136 Md. 244, 110 A. 468. There are circumstances under which an agreement can be rescinded or performance waived by act of the parties (Gibula v. Sause,173 Md. 87, 194 A. 826), but they do not exist here. Furthermore, there had been a payment of $50 made on account of the purchase money. If the contract had been abandoned, this payment should have been returned, but the money was not returned, and the weight of the testimony is that the check given by Loughran to Ramsburg was paid.
 The question of laches, based upon the delay in making the conveyance and the provision in the contract that the property should be conveyed within a period of thirty days from the date of the agreement, and that time was of the essence of the agreement, presents the more difficult problem. The delay in the first instance was caused by the failure of the surveyor to establish the fourth line, and to ascertain and lay off the three acres, but there seems to have been no objection to the surveyor making a second effort at establishing this acreage, and he proceeded to do so. Shortly thereafter, Mr. Paul H. Loughran became ill but, before and after he died, negotiations were continued with a view to arrive at a consummation of the matter. Mr. Jerome A. Loughran, *Page 187
 brother of the deceased, his attorney during his lifetime, and the executor of his will, stated, "My brother was in the hospital; I told Mr. Ramsburg and I told Mr. Seibert, rather than drag him into court in the condition he was in * * * I would settle the case for $100.00 to get rid of it. That was my conversation. I did not want to bring him into court if I could settle it for $100.00 or so." He further said that his brother being in the hospital had a great deal to do with the postponement of the case while he was handling it with Mr. Seibert. Mr. Seibert was the attorney for Mr. Ramsburg at the time of the institution of this suit, on October 20th, 1932. Prior thereto, negotiations were in progress for the consummation of the contract, and, according to Ramsburg's testimony, they were still negotiating a settlement of this matter, and after this suit was brought, Mr. Loughran, the executor, promised him that, as soon as the term of court was concluded, he would settle the matter. It would, therefore, appear from the testimony that the delays were no more the fault of one than the other, and that there was not a definite understanding or agreement to terminate the contract. It is undisputed that Mr. Ramsburg caused to be executed a deed in which the mortgagee of the property joined and in which the property surveyed, containing three acres of land, was proffered to Mr. Loughran but was not received by him, nor was the property paid for in full. We conclude on this point that the negotiations that were continuing, after the lapse of thirty days, the illness of the purchaser, finally resulting in death, and other circumstances related in the case, contributed equally to the delays. Furthermore, with regard to the question of laches, all the facts and circumstances must be taken into account in conjunction with the lapse of time, and the circumstances must prejudice the rights of the adverse parties. We do not find that the appellant or his decedent were prejudiced by the delay in consummating the contract. The effect of laches, as a bar to a suit in a court of equity, has been fully discussed by Chief Judge McSherry, *Page 188
 in Demuth v. Old Town Bank, 85 Md. 315, 326, 37 A. 266. See, also, Labanowski v. Baltimore, 168 Md. 127, 176 A. 615;Roberto v. Catino, 140 Md. 38, 116 A. 873. The defense of laches will not be applied where both parties are guilty of laches. 21 C.J. page 16; Lipsitz v. Parr, 164 Md. 222, 227,164 A. 743.
 The contract here involved is for the sale of real property and is within the statute of frauds, and cannot be legally terminated, after the contract has been executed in part by the payment of the purchase price, or any part thereof, unless the parties are completely restored to their former position, and the contract is actually rescinded or abandoned. 27 C.J. page 201, section 150. And the proof must be clear and positive in order to establish the rescission, cancellation, or abandonment of the agreement. Spellman v. Dundalk Co. and Gibula v. Sause,supra. We do not believe that the testimony in this case satisfies these requirements and, therefore, the decree of the court will be affirmed.
 Decree affirmed, costs to be paid by the appellant.


type: other

text:
2019 DETERMINA N. 828 DEL 2019 - N. 189 SETT. [SER] DEL 2019 CONTRIBUTO ECONOMICO FINALIZZATO ALL'INTEGRAZIONE DELLA RETTA DI DEGENZA IN STURTTURE RESIDENZIALI PER DISABILI omesso in base all'art.26 c.4 del D.Lgs.33/2013 Lenardon Marisa € 8.404,29 12/08/2019
 2019 DETERMINA N. 828 DEL 2019 - N. 189 SETT. [SER] DEL 2019 CONTRIBUTO ECONOMICO FINALIZZATO ALL'INTEGRAZIONE DELLA RETTA DI DEGENZA IN STURTTURE RESIDENZIALI PER DISABILI omesso in base all'art.26 c.4 del D.Lgs.33/2013 Lenardon Marisa € 6.334,20 12/08/2019
 2019 DETERMINA N. 605 DEL 2019 - N. 140 SETT. [SER] DEL 2019 CONTRIBUTI PER RICOVERO ANZIANI IN ISTITUTO omesso in base all'art.26 c.4 del D.Lgs.33/2013 Lenardon Marisa € 419,52 12/06/2019
 2019 DETERMINA N. 605 DEL 2019 - N. 140 SETT. [SER] DEL 2019 CONTRIBUTI PER RICOVERO ANZIANI IN ISTITUTO omesso in base all'art.26 c.4 del D.Lgs.33/2013 Lenardon Marisa € 1.410,00 12/06/2019
 2019 DETERMINA N. 605 DEL 2019 - N. 140 SETT. [SER] DEL 2019 CONTRIBUTI PER RICOVERO ANZIANI IN ISTITUTO omesso in base all'art.26 c.4 del D.Lgs.33/2013 Lenardon Marisa € 2.049,30 12/06/2019
 2019 DETERMINA N. 605 DEL 2019 - N. 140 SETT. [SER] DEL 2019 CONTRIBUTI PER RICOVERO ANZIANI IN ISTITUTO omesso in base all'art.26 c.4 del D.Lgs.33/2013 Lenardon Marisa € 1.200,00 12/06/2019
 2019 DETERMINA N. 605 DEL 2019 - N. 140 SETT. [SER] DEL 2019 CONTRIBUTI PER RICOVERO ANZIANI IN ISTITUTO omesso in base all'art.26 c.4 del D.Lgs.33/2013 Lenardon Marisa € 2.400,00 12/06/2019
 2019 DETERMINA N. 605 DEL 2019 - N. 140 SETT. [SER] DEL 2019 CONTRIBUTI PER RICOVERO ANZIANI IN ISTITUTO omesso in base all'art.26 c.4 del D.Lgs.33/2013 Lenardon Marisa € 791,20 12/06/2019
 2019 DETERMINA N. 590 DEL 2019 - N. 132 SETT. [SER] DEL 2019 CONTRIBUTI ECONOMICI VARI MAGGIO 2019 omesso in base all'art.26 c.4 del D.Lgs.33/2013 Lenardon Marisa € 200,00 05/06/2019
 2019 DETERMINA N. 590 DEL 2019 - N. 132 SETT. [SER] DEL 2019 CONTRIBUTI ECONOMICI VARI MAGGIO 2019 omesso in base all'art.26 c.4 del D.Lgs.33/2013 Lenardon Marisa € 130,00 05/06/2019
 2019 DETERMINA N. 590 DEL 2019 - N. 132 SETT. [SER] DEL 2019 CONTRIBUTI ECONOMICI VARI MAGGIO 2019 omesso in base all'art.26 c.4 del D.Lgs.33/2013 Lenardon Marisa € 1.563,15 05/06/2019
 2019 DETERMINA N. 590 DEL 2019 - N. 132 SETT. [SER] DEL 2019 CONTRIBUTI ECONOMICI VARI MAGGIO 2019 omesso in base all'art.26 c.4 del D.Lgs.33/2013 Lenardon Marisa € 424,60 05/06/2019
 2019 DETERMINA N. 590 DEL 2019 - N. 132 SETT. [SER] DEL 2019 CONTRIBUTI ECONOMICI VARI MAGGIO 2019 omesso in base all'art.26 c.4 del D.Lgs.33/2013 Lenardon Marisa € 900,00 05/06/2019
 2019 DETERMINA N. 590 DEL 2019 - N. 132 SETT. [SER] DEL 2019 CONTRIBUTI ECONOMICI VARI MAGGIO 2019 omesso in base all'art.26 c.4 del D.Lgs.33/2013 Lenardon Marisa € 600,00 05/06/2019
 2019 DETERMINA N. 590 DEL 2019 - N. 132 SETT. [SER] DEL 2019 CONTRIBUTI ECONOMICI VARI MAGGIO 2019 omesso in base all'art.26 c.4 del D.Lgs.33/2013 Lenardon Marisa € 1.000,00 05/06/2019
 2019 DETERMINA N. 583 DEL 2019 - N. 137 SETT. [SER] DEL 2019 CONTRIBUTI ECONOMICI FINALIZZATI ALL’ATTRIBUZIONE DI VOUCHERS PER IL PAGAMENTO DEL SERVIZIO DI ASSISTENZA DOMICILIARE omesso in base all'art.26 c.4 del D.Lgs.33/2013 Lenardon Marisa € 218,04 05/06/2019
 2019 DETERMINA N. 583 DEL 2019 - N. 137 SETT. [SER] DEL 2019 CONTRIBUTI ECONOMICI FINALIZZATI ALL’ATTRIBUZIONE DI VOUCHERS PER IL PAGAMENTO DEL SERVIZIO DI ASSISTENZA DOMICILIARE omesso in base all'art.26 c.4 del D.Lgs.33/2013 Lenardon Marisa € 547,35 05/06/2019


text:
 7.11.2009
 RO
 Jurnalul Oficial al Uniunii Europene
 C 267/10
 Hotărârea Curții (Camera a treia) din 10 septembrie 2009 — Comisia Comunităților Europene/Republica Elenă
 (Cauza C-416/07) (1)
 (Neîndeplinirea obligațiilor de către un stat membru - Directivele 91/628/CEE și 93/119/CE - Regulamentul (CE) nr. 1/2005 - Protecția animalelor în cursul transportului și în momentul sacrificării sau uciderii acestora - Încălcare structurată și generalizată a normelor comunitare)
 2009/C 267/17
 Limba de procedură: greaca
 Părțile
 Reclamantă: Comisia Comunităților Europene (reprezentanți: H. Tserepa-Lacombe și F. Erlbacher, agenți)
 Pârâtă: Republica Elenă (reprezentanți: S. Charitaki, S. Papaïoannou și E.-M. Mamouna, agenți)
 Obiectul
 Neîndeplinirea obligațiilor de către un stat membru — Încălcarea articolului 5, a articolului 8, a articolului 9 și a articolului 18 alineatul (2) din Directiva 91/628/CEE din 19 noiembrie 1991 privind protecția animalelor în cursul transportului și de modificare a Directivelor 91/425/CEE și 91/496/CEE (JO L 340, p. 17, Ediție specială 03/vol. 10, p. 182) — Încălcarea articolului 5 alineatul (4), a articolului 6 alineatul (1), a articolului 13 alineatele (3) și (4), a articolului 15 alineatul (1), a articolului 25, a articolului 26 și a articolului 27 alineatul (1) din Regulamentul (CE) nr. 1/2005 al Consiliului din 22 decembrie 2004 privind protecția animalelor în timpul transportului și al operațiunilor conexe și de modificare a Directivelor 64/432/CEE și 93/119/CE și a Regulamentului (CE) nr. 1255/97 (JO 2005 L 3, p. 1) — Încălcarea articolului 3, a articolului 5 alineatul (1), a articolului 6 alineatul (1) și a articolului 8 din Directiva 93/119/CE a Consiliului din 22 decembrie 1993 privind protecția animalelor în momentul sacrificării sau uciderii (JO L 340, p. 21, Ediție specială 03/vol. 14, p. 157).
 Dispozitivul
 1.
 Prin faptul că nu a luat măsurile necesare:
 —
 pentru ca autoritățile competente să efectueze controalele obligatorii ale planurilor de drum;
 —
 pentru a amenaja în porturile ferry sau în apropierea acestora instalații în care animalele să se poată odihni după debarcarea de pe ambarcațiuni;
 —
 pentru a fi efectiv realizate inspecții ale mijloacelor de transport și ale animalelor;
 —
 pentru a asigura respectarea normelor de asomare a animalelor în momentul sacrificării acestora și
 —
 pentru ca inspectarea și controlarea abatoarelor să fie realizate în mod corespunzător,
 Republica Elenă nu și-a îndeplinit obligațiile care îi revin în temeiul articolului 5 secțiunea A punctul 2 litera (d) subpunctul (i) prima liniuță și al articolului 8 din Directiva 91/628/CEE a Consiliului din 19 noiembrie 1991 privind protecția animalelor în cursul transportului și de modificare a Directivelor 90/425/CEE și 91/496/CEE, astfel cum a fost modificată prin Regulamentul (CE) nr. 806/2003 al Consiliului din 14 aprilie 2003, și al subpunctului 7 litera (b) din cuprinsul punctului 48 din capitolul VII din anexa la aceeași directivă, astfel cum a fost modificată prin Regulamentul nr. 806/2003, precum și al articolului 3, al articolului 5 alineatul (1) litera (d), al articolului 6 alineatul (1) și al articolului 8 din Directiva 93/119/CE a Consiliului din 22 decembrie 1993 privind protecția animalelor în momentul sacrificării sau uciderii.
 2.
 Respinge acțiunea cu privire la restul motivelor.
 3.
 Obligă Republica Elenă să suporte două treimi din cheltuielile de judecată. Obligă Comisia Comunităților Europene să suporte o treime din cheltuielile de judecată.
 (1) JO C 283, 24.11.2007.


text:
Προγράμματα ΟΑΕΔ 2020: Τα 10 νέα προγράμματα για 56.000 ανέργους
 15, Αύγουστος, 2020 | 02:36
 Προγράμματα ΟΑΕΔ 2020: Τα 10 νέα προγράμματα για ανέργους
 HOT NEWS - ΕΙΔΗΣΕΙΣ ΣΗΜΕΡΑ LIVE ΔΗΜΟΣΙΟ 11|08|2020
 Προγράμματα ΟΑΕΔ 2020: Δέκα νέα προγράμματα, από τα οποία θα ωφεληθούν 56.000 άνεργοι, φέρνει ο ΟΑΕΔ μέσα στις επόμενες εβδομάδες.
 Πρώτο θα ξεκινήσει το νέο βελτιωμένο πρόγραμμα της Επιταγής Επανένταξης στην αγορά εργασίας και στην συνέχεια θα ακολουθήσουν από τον Σεπτέμβριο νέα προγράμματα για 47.000 ανέργους.
 Ειδικότερα μέσα στον Αύγουστο θα ξεκινήσει ο ΟΑΕΔ το βελτιωμένο πρόγραμμα της Επιταγής Επανένταξης που επιχορηγεί για 12 μήνες εργοδότες του ιδιωτικού τομέα που προσλαμβάνουν επιδοτούμενους ανέργους με «επιταγές επανένταξης» σε θέσεις πλήρους απασχόλησης.
 Προγράμματα ΟΑΕΔ 2020: Τα προγράμματα Σεπτεμβρίου
 Προγράμματα ΟΑΕΔ 2020: Τα προγράμματα Οκτωβρίου
 Απόκτησης εργασιακής εμπειρίας που επιχορηγεί με έως 813 ευρώ μηνιαίως για 7 μήνες το 100% του μισθολογικού και μη μισθολογικού κόστους για την πρόσληψη 10.000 ανέργων 18-29 ετών σε ιδιωτικές και δημόσιες επιχειρήσεις της Αττικής και της Κεντρικής Μακεδονίας.
 Απασχόλησης νέων πτυχιούχων. Το πρόγραμμα θα επιχορηγεί με έως 950 ευρώ μηνιαίως για 10 μήνες το 100% του μισθολογικού και μη μισθολογικού κόστους για την πρόσληψη 6.000 ανέργων 22-29 ετών με πτυχίο σε ιδιωτικές επιχειρήσεις. – Κατάρτισης και απασχόλησης ανέργων σε ειδικότητες υψηλής ζήτηση. Το πρόγραμμα θα επιχορηγεί με έως 475 ευρώ μηνιαίως για 8 μήνες το 50% του μισθολογικού και μη μισθολογικού κόστους για την κατάρτιση και πρόσληψη 4.500 ανέργων ηλικίας 18-29 ετών σε ιδιωτικές επιχειρήσεις.
 Προγράμματα ΟΑΕΔ 2020 Τα προγράμματα Δεκεμβρίου
 ΑΙΤΗΣΗ ΓΙΑ ΕΠΙΔΟΜΑ ΑΝΕΡΓΙΑΣ ΟΑΕΔ ΔΙΚΑΙΟΛΟΓΗΤΙΚΑ ΓΙΑ ΕΠΙΔΟΜΑ ΑΝΕΡΓΙΑΣ ΟΑΕΔ ΔΙΚΑΙΟΛΟΓΗΤΙΚΑ ΓΙΑ ΚΑΡΤΑ ΑΝΕΡΓΙΑΣ ΔΙΚΑΙΟΛΟΓΗΤΙΚΑ ΓΙΑ ΚΑΡΤΑ ΑΝΕΡΓΙΑΣ ΟΑΕΔ ΔΙΚΑΙΟΛΟΓΗΤΙΚΑ ΓΙΑ ΤΑΜΕΙΟ ΑΝΕΡΓΙΑΣ ΔΙΚΑΙΟΥΧΟΙ ΓΙΑ ΕΠΙΔΟΜΑ ΑΝΕΡΓΙΑΣ ΟΑΕΔ ΕΙΔΗΣΕΙΣ ΣΗΜΕΡΑ ΕΙΔΗΣΕΙΣ ΤΩΡΑ ΕΙΔΙΚΟΤΗΤΕΣ ΟΑΕΔ ΕΙΔΙΚΟΤΗΤΕΣ ΟΑΕΔ ΚΟΙΝΩΦΕΛΗΣ ΕΡΓΑΣΙΑ 2020 ΚΑΤΑΝΟΜΗ ΕΠΙΔΟΜΑ ΑΝΕΡΓΙΑΣ ΕΠΙΔΟΜΑ ΑΝΕΡΓΙΑΣ 2020 ΕΠΙΔΟΜΑ ΜΑΚΡΟΧΡΟΝΙΩΣ ΑΝΕΡΓΩΝ ΚΑΡΤΑ ΑΝΕΡΓΙΑΣ ΝΕΑ ΟΑΕΔ ΟΑΕΔ ΕΠΙΔΟΜΑ ΜΑΚΡΟΧΡΟΝΙΩΣ ΑΝΕΡΓΩΝ ΟΑΕΔ ΕΠΙΔΟΜΑΤΑ ΑΝΕΡΓΙΑΣ 2020 ΟΑΕΔ ΠΡΟΓΡΑΜΜΑΤΑ ΟΙΚΟΝΟΜΙΚΗ ΕΝΙΣΧΥΣΗ ΑΝΕΡΓΩΝ ΠΡΟΓΡΑΜΜΑΤΑ ΟΑΕΔ ΤΑΜΕΙΟ ΑΝΕΡΓΙΑΣ ΤΑΜΕΙΟ ΑΝΕΡΓΙΑΣ ΟΑΕΔ
 Προσλήψεις 2020: 1.209 μόνιμες στο Υπουργείο Υγείας μέσω ΑΣΕΠ


text:
Teade: 01.01.2019 jõustub elektrienergia müügi tegevuslube puudutav elektrituruseaduse muudatus - Uudis.eu Riik
 01.01.2019 jõustub elektrituruseaduse (ELTS) muudatus, mille järgi asendub loakohustus elektrienergia müügil majandustegevuse seadustiku üldosa seaduses sätestatud teatamiskohustusega.Seega esitab elektrienergia müügiga tegeleda sooviv ettevõtja alates 01.01.2019 majandustegevuse registrile riigiportaali www.eesti.ee kaudu (otsetee: http://mtr.mkm.ee) senise tegevusloa taotluse asemel elektrienergia müügi majandustegevusteate.Teatamiskohustus puudub järgmistel juhtudel:elektrienergia müügil ELTS § 15 lg 6 punkti 1 või 2 kohaselttootja toodetud elektrienergia müügilelektrienergia müügil elektribörsilelektrienergia müügil ELTS § 16 lõike 3 kohaseltelektrienergia müügil, kui jaotusvõrguettevõtja osutab turuosalisele ainult ELTS § 44 lõike 41 kohaselt avatud tarne teenust või § 761 kohaselt üldteenustelektrienergia müügil, kui elektrienergia on tarbijale edastatud otseliini kaudu ja toodetud kokku alla 200 kW netovõimsusega tootmisseadmete abil Majandustegevusteade tuleb registrile esitada ka ettevõtjal, kes omab hetkel tegevusluba tegutsemiseks elektrienergia müügiga. Kuni majandustegevusteate registreerimiseni tegutseb selline elektrienergia müüja tegevusloa alusel ja temale laieneb kohustus tasuda tegevusloa eest ettenähtud riigilõiv. Täiendav informatsioon elektrienergia müüjatele on toodud Majandus- ja Kommunikatsiooniministeeriumi kirjas Lisateave:Anu VainikEkspertEnergeetika- ja postiosakondKonkurentsiametTel: +372 667 2572
 31.03.2019 16:12 53
 elektrienergia müügil ELTS § 15 lg 6 punkti 1 või 2 kohaselt
 tootja toodetud elektrienergia müügil
 elektrienergia müügil elektribörsil
 elektrienergia müügil ELTS § 16 lõike 3 kohaselt
 elektrienergia müügil, kui jaotusvõrguettevõtja osutab turuosalisele ainult ELTS § 44 lõike 41 kohaselt avatud tarne teenust või § 761 kohaselt üldteenust
 elektrienergia müügil, kui elektrienergia on tarbijale edastatud otseliini kaudu ja toodetud kokku alla 200 kW netovõimsusega tootmisseadmete abil
 Täiendav informatsioon elektrienergia müüjatele on toodud Majandus- ja Kommunikatsiooniministeeriumi kirjas
 Tel: +372 667 2572
 Pressiteade: Konkurentsiamet algatas seoses Saaremaal toimunud ulatusliku elektrikatkestusega...
 MAHETOODANGU ANDMETE ESITAMINE 1. VEEBRUARIKS 2019
 3 kuud tagasi Konkurentsiamet 61 Link


type: legislation

text:
N° C 85/82 Diario Oficial de las Comunidades Europeas 14. 4. 86
 Propuesta de Reglamento (CEE) del Consejo por el que se modifica el Reglamento (CEE) n° 872/84
 que establece las reglas generales relativas a la concesión de la prima a favor de los productores de
 carne de ovino
 COM(86) 20 final
 (Presentada por la Comisión al Consejo el 14 de febrero de 1986)
 (86/C 85/49)
 EL CONSEJO DE LAS COMUNIDADES EUROPEAS, HA ADOPTADO EL PRESENTE REGLAMENTO:
 Visto el Tratado constitutivo de la Comunidad Económica Artículo 1
 Europea,
 Visto el Reglamento (CEE) n° 1837/80 del Consejo, de 27 En el Reglamento (CEE) n° 872/84 se añadirá el siguiente
 de junio de 1980, por el que se establece la organización artículo 1 bis:
 común de mercados en el sector de las carnes de ovino y
 «Artículo 1 bis
 caprino ( ! ), cuya última modificación la constituye el Regla-
 mento (CEE) n° / 8 5 , y, en particular, el apartado 9 La prima a favor de los productores de carnes de ovino y
 del artículo 5, caprino contemplada en el artículo 5 del Reglamento
 (CEE) n° 1837/80 se concederá por un máximo de 500
 Vista la propuesta de la Comisión,
 animales por productor en las zonas menos favorecidas
 Considerando que el apartado 8 del artículo 5 del Reglamen- con arreglo a los apartados 3, 4 y 5 del artículo 3 de la
 to (CEE) n° 1837/80 prevé que la concesión de la prima a Directiva 75/268/CEE, y por un máximo de 1 000
 favor de los productores de ovinos y caprinos podrá limitarse animales por productor en las demás zonas.»
 a un cierto número de animales por productor beneficiario;
 que ha parecido conveniente, a la vista del desarrollo de la
 producción de carne de ovino y caprino y para limitar el
 Artículo 2
 aumento del coste presupuestario en este sector, prever la
 limitación de la prima a 500 animales por productor
 beneficiario; que, sin embargo, teniendo en cuenta las El presente Reglamento entrará en vigor a los tres días de su
 condiciones de producción especialmente difíciles en las publicación en el Diario Oficial de las Comunidades Euro-
 zonas menos favorecidas de la Comunidad con arreglo a los peas.
 apartados 3, 4 y 5 del artículo 3 de la Directiva 7 5 /
 268/CEE (2), es conveniente llevar esta limitación hasta Se aplicará a partir del comienzo de la campaña de comer-
 1 000 animales y modificar el Reglamento (CEE) n° 872/84 cialización que se iniciará en 1987.
 del Consejo ( 3 ).
 H DO n° L 183 de 16. 7. 1980, p. 1.
 (2) DO n° L 128 de 19. 5. 1975, p. 1. El presente Reglamento será obligatorio en todos sus elemen-
 (3) DO n° L 90 de 1. 4. 1984, p. 40. tos y directamente aplicable en cada Estado miembro.
 Propuesta de Reglamento (CEE) del Consejo por el que se fijan el precio de base y la calidad tipo del
 cerdo sacrificado para el período comprendido entre el 1 de agosto de 1986 y el 31 de octubre de
 1987
 COM(86) 20 final
 (Presentada por la Comisión al Consejo el 14 de febrero de 1986)
 (86/C 85/50)
 EL CONSEJO DE LAS COMUNIDADES EUROPEAS, común de mercados en el sector de la carne de porcino i1),
 modificado en último lugar por el Reglamento (CEE)
 Visto el Tratado constitutivo de la Comunidad Económica n° y, en particular, el apartado 4 de su artículo 4,
 Europea y, en particular, su artículo 43,
 Vista la propuesta de la Comisión,
 Visto el Reglamento (CEE) n° 2759/75 del Consejo, de 29
 de octubre de 1975, por el que se establece la organización (») DO n° L 282 de 1. 11. 1975, p. 1.
 ---pagebreak--- 14. 4. 86 Diario Oficial de las Comunidades Europeas N° C 85/83
 Visto el dictamen del Parlamento Europeo, preciso fijar la fecha de la entrada en vigor de la nueva calidad
 tipo para el 1 de agosto de 1986 y derogar el Reglamento
 (CEE)n° 1504/85,
 Considerando que, al fijar el precio de base del cerdo
 sacrificado, conviene tomar en consideración tanto los
 objetivos de la política agrícola común como la constitución HA ADOPTADO EL PRESENTE REGLAMENTO:
 que la Comunidad quiere hacer al desarrollo armonioso del
 comercio mundial; que la política agrícola común tiene como Artículo 1
 principales objetivos garantizar un nivel de vida justo para la
 población agrícola, asegurar el abastecimiento y garantizar El precio de base del cerdo sacrificado de la calidad tipo se fija
 precios razonables en las entregas a los consumidores; en 2 033,30 ECUS por tonelada, para el período compren-
 dido entre el 1 de agosto de 1986 y el 31 de octubre de
 1987.
 Considerando que el precio de base debe fijarse con arreglo a
 los criterios establecidos en el apartado 1, artículo 4 del Artículo 2
 Reglamento (CEE) n° 2759/75 para una calidad tipo
 definida según una tabla comunitaria de clasificación de las La calidad tipo se definirá en función del peso y del contenido
 canales de porcino; en carne magra de las canales de porcino, determinados
 conforme a los apartados 2 y 3, artículo 2 del Reglamento
 (CEE) n° 3220/85, de la siguiente manera:
 Considerando que el Reglamento (CEE) n° 1504/85 del
 Consejo (J) ha fijado el precio de base y la calidad tipo para — clase «U» para las canales de peso comprendido entre 60
 las canales de porcino; que la calidad tipo fue definida, en y menos de 100 kg,
 ese mismo Reglamento, conforme al Reglamento (CEE) o
 n° 2760/75 del Consejo, de 29 de octubre de 1975, por el
 que se establecía la tabla comunitaria de clasificación de las — clase «R» para las canales de peso comprendido entre 100
 canales de porcino (2); y menos de 130 kg.
 Considerando que el Reglamento (CEE) n° 2760/70 quedó Artículo 3
 derogado por el Reglamento (CEE) n° 3220/84 del Consejo,
 de 13 de noviembre de 1984, por el que se establece la tabla Queda derogado el Reglamento (CEE) n° 1504/85.
 comunitaria de clasificación de las canales de porcino (3);
 que, en consecuencia, conviene definir de nuevo la calidad
 tipo de las canales en términos de peso y de porcentaje de Artículo 4
 carne magra, determinados conforme al Reglamento (CEE)
 n° 3220/84; El presente Reglamento entrará en vigor a los tres días de
 su publicación en el Diario Oficial de las Comunidades
 Europeas.
 Considerando que, con el fin de no retrasar la aplicación de la
 nueva tabla de clasificación de las canales de porcino, es Se aplicará a partir del 1 de agosto de 1986.
 í1) DO n° L 151 de 10. 6. 1985, p. 30.
 (2) DO n° L 282 de 1. 11. 1975, p. 10. El presente Reglamento será obligatorio en todos sus elemen-
 (3) DO n° L 301 de 20. 11. 1984, p. 1. tos y directamente aplicable en cada Estado miembro.
 Propuesta de Reglamento (CEE) del Consejo por el que se modifica el Reglamento (CEE) n° 2759/75,
 relativo a la organización común de mercados en el sector de la carne de porcino
 COM(86) 20 final
 (Presentada por la Comisión al Consejo el 14 de febrero de 1986)
 (86/C 85/51)
 EL CONSEJO DE LAS COMUNIDADES EUROPEAS, Visto el dictamen del Parlamento Europeo,
 Visto el Tratado constitutivo de la Comunidad Económica Considerando que el Reglamento (CEE) n° 2759/75 del
 Europea y, en particular, su artículo 43, Consejo (J)> modificado en último lugar por el Reglamento
 Vista la propuesta de la Comisión, (>) DO n° L 2 8 2 de 1. 11. 1985, p. 1.


text:
 Fógra dlíthiúil tábhachtach
 |
 52009PC0322
 Togra le haghaidh Rialacháin ó Pharlaimint na hEorpa agus ón gComhairle lena leasaítear Rialachán (CE) Uimh. 377/2004 ón gComhairle maidir le gréasán oifigeach idirchaidrimh inimirce a chruthú /* COIM/2009/0322 leagan deireanach - COD 2009/0098 */
 [pic] | COIMISIÚN NA gCOMHPHOBAL EORPACH |An Bhruiséil8.7.2009COIM(2009) 322 leagan deireanach2009/0098 (COD)Togra le haghaidhRIALACHÁIN Ó PHARLAIMINT NA hEORPA AGUS ÓN gCOMHAIRLElena leasaítear Rialachán (CE) Uimh. 377/2004 ón gComhairle maidir le gréasán oifigeach idirchaidrimh inimirce a chruthúMEABHRÁN MÍNIÚCHÁIN1. COMHTHÉACS AN TOGRA- Forais agus cuspóirí an tograSa togra seo pléitear leasuithe ar Rialachán (CE) Uimh. 377/2004 maidir le gréasán oifigeach idirchaidrimh inimirce a chruthú[1] (dá ngairtear anseo feasta: 'an Rialachán') atá riachtanach d'fhonn a áirithiú go n-úsáidfear go héifeachtach an uirlis comhair seo agus inimirce agus teorainneacha seachtracha á mbainistiú. Is é aidhm an togra an Rialachán a oiriúnú, i bhfianaise na taithí praiticiúla, d'athruithe ar dhlí an Chomhphobail a tháinig i bhfeidhm ó glacadh é.- Comhthéacs ginearáltaAr an 19 Feabhra 2004, ghlac an Chomhairle, ag féachaint don tionscnamh ón nGréig agus don tuairim ó Pharlaimint na hEorpa, Rialachán (CE) Uimh. 377/2004, lena leagtar síos an oibleagáid maidir le foirmeacha comhair a bhunú i measc oifigeach idirchaidrimh inimirce na mBallstát, le cuspóirí an chomhair sin, le feidhmeanna agus cáilíochtaí iomchuí na n-oifigeach idirchaidrimh sin, chomh maith lena bhfreagrachtaí i leith na tíre óstaí agus an Ballstát a sheolann. Sa Rialachán, ciallaíonn 'oifigeach idirchaidrimh inimirce ' ionadaí ó aon cheann de na Ballstáit, arna bpostú thar lear ag an tseirbhís inimirce nó ag údaráis inniúla eile chun teagmháil a bhunú agus a chothabháil le húdaráis na tíre ostaí d'fhonn rannchuidiú le hinimirce neamhdhlíthiúil a chosc agus a chomhrac, filleadh inimirceach neamhdhlíthiúil a éascú agus imirce dhlíthiúil a bhainistiú. Áirítear anseo 'oifigigh idirchaidrimh aerlíne', 'comhairleoirí doiciméad' agus 'oifigigh idirchaidrimh um fhorghníomhú an dlí' sa mhéid is go bhfuil orthusan freisin na cúraimí thuasluaite a chomhlíonadh.Déantar oifigigh idirchaidrimh inimirce a phostú de ghnáth in oifigí consalachta Ballstát i dtríú tíortha nó in údaráis inniúla Ballstát eile, ach d'fhéadfaí iad a phostú in údaráis inniúla na dtríú tíortha lena mbaineann, chomh maith le heagraíochtaí idirnáisiúnta ar feadh tréimhse réasúnta ama a chinnfidh an Ballstát a dhéanfaidh an postú.An 26 Deireadh Fómhair 2004, ghlac an Chomhairle Rialachán (CE) Uimh. 2007/2004 lena mbunaítear Gníomhaireacht Eorpach chun Comhar Oibríochtúil a Bhainistiú ag Teorainneacha Seachtracha Bhallstáit an Aontais Eorpaigh (FRONTEX)[2]. De bhun Airteagal 2(1)(c) den Rialachán seo, déanfaidh FRONTEX anailísí riosca. Ní foláir go mbeidh na hanailísí seo bunaithe ar na hacmhainní is leithne agus is féidir, ach is iad údaráis inniúla na mBallstát a bhaileoidh agus a sholáthróidh iad go príomha. D'fhonn a mhisean a chur i gcrích, ní foláir do FRONTEX freisin comhar oibríochtúil a éascú idir na Ballstáit agus tríú tíortha. Féadfaidh sé comhoibriú le húdaráis inniúla tríú tíortha nó le heagraíochtaí idirnáisiúnta faoi chuimsiú socruithe oibre arna dtabhairt i gcrích leis na húdaráis seo. Féadfar go gcumhdóidh an comhar seo, inter alia , malartú taithí maidir le saincheisteanna a bhaineann le teorainneacha a rialú, gardaí teorann a oiliúint, faisnéis oibríochtúil a mhalartú agus le hoibríochtaí comhpháirteacha. Níl buanionadaíocht ag FRONTEX i dtríú tír ar bith. Cé go bhféadfadh oifigigh idirchaidrimh inimirce arna bpostú i dtríú tíortha ábhartha rannchuidiú go suntasach le cúraimí thuasluaite FRONTEX a chomhlíonadh, níltear ag baint leasa iomlán as seo go fóill i ngeall ar nach bhfuil naisc leordhóthanacha idir na hoifigigh idirchaidrimh agus an Ghníomhaireacht.Is príomheilimintí le haghaidh comhair fheabhsaithe iad modhanna cumarsáide struchtúrtha agus slán le haghaidh oifigeach idirchaidrimh inimirce a oibríonn sa réimse agus le haghaidh malartú faisnéise le Ballstáit eile. I gCinneadh 2005/267/CE ón gComhairle an 16 Márta 2005[3] lena mbunaítear Líonra Faisnéise agus Comhordaithe slán bunaithe ar an ngréasán le haghaidh Seirbhísí Bainistithe Imirce Ballstát (dá ngairtear 'ICONet'), a fhorlíontar le Cinneadh ón gCoimisiún an 15 Nollaig 2005[4] lena leagtar síos rialacha mionsonraithe chun an Cinneadh sin ón gComhairle a chur chun feidhme, foráiltear d'ardán le haghaidh malartú faisnéise straitéisí, oirbheartaíochta agus oibríochtúla maidir le gluaiseachtaí imirce mídhleathacha. Is éard atá sa 'ghréasán ILO' comhpháirt ar leith d'ICONet, ina bhfuil fo-ailt le haghaidh liostaí oifigeach idirchaidrimh inimirce agus oifigeach idirchaidrimh aerlíne (nach bhfuil in úsáid faoi láthair), le haghaidh lárphointí/aonad náisiúnta ILO na mBallstát agus le haghaidh faisnéise réigiúnaí. Tá an ceann deiridh seo foroinnte i limistéir gheografacha, áit inar féidir an fhaisnéis ábhartha go léir (e.g. tuarascálacha tíre, anailís riosca) a chur ar fáil do na hoifigigh idirchaidrimh inimirce.Is léir ón taithí phraiticiúil nach mbaintear úsáid dhóthanach as an 'Gréasán ILO'. Molann an Coimisiún an uirlis chumarsáide shlán agus inrochtana go héasca seo a chur chun cinn trí thagairt don ghréasán a chur leis an airteagal comhfhreagrach sa Rialachán.Tá roinnt Ballstát tar éis comhaontú go neamhfhoirmiúil gréasáin ILO réigiúnacha a stiúradh san Afraic agus cruinnithe a thionól sa chomhthéacs seo. I bhfianaise nach spreagann foclaíocht reatha an Rialacháin ach amháin na Ballstáit a shealbhaíonn Uachtaránacht Chomhairle an Aontais Eorpaigh (nó na Ballstáit a fheidhmíonn mar Uachtaránacht ghníomhach) na cruinnithe sin a thionól ar a dtionscnamh féin, molann an Coimisiún soiléiriú a thabharfadh le tuiscint go mbeidh na Ballstáit a thoilíonn gréasáin réigiúnacha a stiúradh i gcumas a leithéidí de chruinnithe a thionól.A mhéid is a bhaineann le cúraimí tuairiscithe, ordaíonn an Rialachán 'Maidir leis an mBallstát a shealbhaíonn Uachtaránacht Chomhairle an Aontais Eorpaigh nó, mura ndéantar ionadaíocht thar ceann an Bhallstáit seo sa tír ná sa réigiún, maidir leis an mBallstát atá ag fónamh mar Uachtaránacht ghníomhach, tarraingeoidh sé suas, faoi dheireadh gach seimeastair, tuarascáil ar ghníomhaíochtaí na ngréasán oifigeach idirchaidrimh inimirce ina bhfuil ionadaí aige, agus ar an staid sa tír óstach, i gcúrsaí a bhaineann le hinimirce neamhdhlíthiúil sa Chomhairle agus sa Choimisiún. Tarraingeofar suas na tuarascálacha sin i gcomhréir le múnla agus formáid arna mbunú ag an gCoimisiún[5]. Is éard a bheidh sna tuarascálacha seo foirm fhíor-riachtanach faisnéise d'fhonn tuarascáil mheastóireachta a ullmhú ag deireadh gach Uachtaránachta, tuarascáil a chuirfear faoi bhráid na Comhairle, agus arna ndréachtú ag an gCoimisiún, maidir leis an staid reatha i ngach tríú tír ina bhfuil oifigigh idirchaidrimh inimirce na mBallstát postaithe. 'Ó tháinig an Rialachán i bhfeidhm, tíolacadh sé thuarascáil ar ghníomhaíochtaí ghréasáin ILO, ag Uachtaránacht na Ríochta Aontaithe, na hOstaire, na Fionlainne, na Gearmáine, na Portaingéile agus na Slóivéine, agus iad ag díriú ar thríú tíortha roghnaithe amháin. Ní raibh an Coimisiún ábalta a oibleagáid a chomhlíonadh i dtaca le tuarascáil mheastóireachta chuimsitheach ar bhonn na dtuarascálacha Uachtaránachta a chur faoi bhráid na Comhairle ach oiread. I bhfianaise go bhfuil, faoi láthair, oifigigh idirchaidrimh inimirce póstaithe i níos mó ná 130 tríú tíortha, níl na forálacha seo maidir le hoibleagáidí tuairiscithe infheidhme i gcleachtas. Dá bhrí sin, molann an Coimisiún na forálacha ábhartha a oiriúnú ar bhealach suntasach.Le Cinneadh 574/2007/CE ó Pharlaimint na hEorpa agus ón gComhairle an 23 Bealtaine 2007 bunaítear, go ceann tréimhse ón 1 Eanáir 2007 go 31 Nollaig 2013, an Ciste um Theorainneacha Seachtracha faoi chuimsiú an Chláir Ghinearálta 'Dlúthpháirtíocht agus Bainistiú Sreabha Imirce[6]', d'fhonn rannchuidiú le neartú an limistéir saoirse, slándála agus ceartais agus ag cur prionsabal na dlúthpháirtíochta i bhfeidhm idir na Ballstáit. Féadfar na hacmhainní atá ar fáil ón gciste seo a úsáid chun na gníomhaíochtaí arna n-eagrú ag seirbhísí consalachta agus seirbhísí eile na mBallstát i dtríú tíortha a fheabhsú, lena n-áirítear gníomhaíochtaí oifigeach idirchaidrimh inimirce. Mar a dhearbhaítear in Airteagal 4(4)(a) den Chinneadh seo, tacóidh an Chiste um Theorainneacha Seachtracha le cumas oibríochtúil ghréasáin ILO a neartú agus le comhar níos éifeachtúla a chur chun cinn trí na gréasáin sin idir na Ballstáit.I Meitheamh 2008, ghlac an Coimisiún Teachtaireacht maidir le comhbheartas inimirce[7], lena leagtar amach prionsabail, gníomhaíochtaí agus uirlisí, ag cur le príomhchéimeanna na Comhairle Eorpaí in Tampere, Clár na Háige agus an Cur Chuige Coiteann maidir le hImirce, a láinseáladh in 2005. I bhfianaise na Teachtaireachta seo, ghlac an Chomhairle Eorpach an 15-16 Deireadh Fómhair 2008 an Comhaontú Eorpach um Inimirce agus Tearmann[8] inar leagadh béim ar an ngá le comhar níos mó idir na Ballstáit agus an Coimisiún agus na tíortha tionscnaimh agus idirthurais d'fhonn inimirce neamhdhlíthiúil a rialú.- Forálacha atá ann cheana i réimse an tograRialachán (CE) Uimh. 377/2004 ón gComhairle an 19 Feabhra 2004 maidir le gréasán oifigeach idirchaidrimh inimirce a chruthú;Cinneadh 2005/267/CE ón gComhairle an 16 Márta 2005[9] lena mbunaítear Líonra Faisnéise agus Comhordaithe daingean bunaithe ar an ngréasán le haghaidh Seirbhísí Bainistithe Imirce Ballstát;Cinneadh ón gCoimisiún an 15 Nollaig 2005[10] lena leagtar síos rialacha mionsonraithe maidir le Cinneadh 2005 267/CE ón gComhairle a chur chun feidhme;Meabhrán Comhthuisceana maidir le Líonra Faisnéise agus Comhordaithe slán bunaithe ar an ngréasán le haghaidh Seirbhísí Bainistithe Imirce Ballstát a bhunú, idir an Coimisiún Eorpach agus an Ghníomhaireacht Eorpach chun Comhar Oibríochtúil a Bhainistiú ag Teorainneacha Seachtracha Bhallstáit an Aontais Eorpaigh[11].2. COMHAIRLIÚCHÁN LEIS NA PÁIRTITHE LEASMHARA AGUS MEASÚNÚ IARMHARTA- Comhairliúchán leis na páirtithe leasmharaChuathas i gcomhairle ar dtús leis na Ballstáit suas go deireadh 2006 ar bhonn ceistneora ar cuireadh tús leis le linn Uachtaránacht na Fionlainne i nGrúpa Oibre na Comhairle CIREFI. Pléadh na freagraí i SCIFA i Márta 2007.Mheas na Ballstáit nach raibh an oibleagáid tuairiscithe leathan in Airteagal 6 den Rialachán iomchuí agus chuir siad béim ar an mbreisluach ach rannpháirtíocht FRONTEX a bheith níos mó ann. Chuir siad in iúl freisin gur mhian leo cur le húsáid ICONet agus comhar idir oifigigh idirchaidrimh inimirce san Afraic a fheabhsú. Pléadh an ghné dheiridh seo ag cruinniú saineolaithe go déanach san Earrach 2007 agus sa Choiste um Inimirce agus Thearmann i nDeireadh Fómhair 2007.I Márta 2008, scaip an Coimisiún ceistneoir le roghanna éagsúla i dtaca le Rialachán (CE) 377/2004 ón gComhairle a leasú. Bunaithe ar na freagraí a fuarthas, i nDeireadh Fómhair 2008, chuir an Coimisiún doiciméad oibre neamhfhoirmiúil ina raibh tograí coincréiteacha chun forálacha ábhartha an Rialacháin a leasú faoi bhráid an Choiste um Inimirce agus Tearmann. Mhol an Coimisiún go dtíolacfaidís, sa chéad chéim, na leasuithe ba ghá i dtaca le hoibleagáidí tuairiscithe, le rannpháirtíocht FRONTEX agus le feabhsú ICONet. Sa dara céim, dhéanfaí athbhreithniú ar an ngá le hoifigeach idirchaidrimh inimirce 'AE' — a d'fhéadfaí a phostú chun a bheith ionadaitheach do leasanna na mBallstát go léir chomh maith le comhlachtaí AE ábhartha — a chruthú agus na féidearthachtaí a bhainfeadh leis i ndáil le hathbhreithniú Rialachán FRONTEX atá pleanáilte do 2010. San athbhreithniú seo dhéanfaí caibidliú ar an bhfreagracht as bainistiú ICONet a aistriú ón gCoimisiún go FRONTEX.Thacaigh na Ballstáit leis na tograí seo, lena n-áirítear an cur chuige le dhá chéim ann.- Measúnú iarmhartaNí dhearnadh measúnú iarmharta mar nach dtugann an togra reatha isteach sa reachtaíocht atá ann cheana ach mionathruithe agus iad de chineál teicniúil go príomha. Ní bheidh aon iarmhairt inaitheanta eacnamaíoch, shóisialta nó comhshaoil ag na hathruithe seo. Anuas air sin, is é is aidhm le Beartas an AE um Rialáil Níos Fearr, as measc rudaí eile, an reachtaíocht atá ann cheana a shimpliú agus a fheabhsú i gcomhréir le prionsabal na comhréireachta. Comhlíontar na cuspóirí sin sa togra seo trí comhsheasmhacht le hathruithe i ndlí an Chomhphobail a tháinig i bhfeidhm ó glacadh an Rialachán a áirithiú, agus an taithí phraiticiúil a fuarthas le linn a chur chun feidhme á cur san áireamh.3. EILIMINTÍ DLÍTHIÚLA AN TOGRA- Achoimre ar na gníomhaíochtaí atá beartaitheLeis na leasuithe a mholtar bunaítear nasc agus tugtar bonn dlíthiúil le haghaidh comhair idir FRONTEX agus na gréasáin ILO, chun úsáid ICONet a chur chun cinn le haghaidh malartú rialta faisnéise agus taithí praiticiúla, chun aird a dhíriú ar an bhféidearthacht cistí Comhphobail atá ar fáil a úsáid chun gréasáin ILO a chruthú agus a oibriú go rianúil, agus chun an córas tuairiscithe a bhaineann le gréasáin bbunaithe ILO a chuíchóiriú, lena n-áirithítear go gcuirtear Parlaimint na hEorpa mar chomhreachtóir[12] sa réimse beartais seo ar an eolas go hiomchuí.- Bonn dlíthiúilIs iad Airteagal 63(3)(b) agus Airteagal 66 den Chonradh ag bunú an Chomhphobail Eorpaigh an bonn dlíthiúil don togra seo le haghaidh Rialacháin, mar go leasaítear Rialachán (CE) Uimh. 377/2004 ón gComhairle an 19 Feabhra 2004 maidir le gréasán oifigeach idirchaidrimh inimirce a chruthú, atá bunaithe ar na hAirteagail seo leis, agus toisc go sonrófar tuilleadh feidhmiú na ngréasán sin leis.- Prionsabal na coimhdeachtaDe réir Airteagal 63(3)(b) de Chonradh AE, tá sé de chumhacht ag an gComhphobal bearta a ghlacadh i ndáil le hinimirce neamhdhlíthiúil agus cónaí neamhdhlíthiúil, lena n-áirítear cónaitheoirí neamhdhlíthiúla a athdhúichiú. De réir Airteagal 66, ní foláir don Chomhairle, ag gníomhú di i gcomhréir leis an nós imeachta dá dtagraítear in Airteagal 67, bearta a ghlacadh d'fhonn comhar a áirithiú idir ranna ábhartha riaracháin na mBallstát, agus idir na ranna sin agus an Coimisiún chomh maith. Ní foláir forálacha reatha an Chomhphobail maidir le gréasáin ILO a chruthú agus a fheidhmiú a oiriúnú chun athruithe i ndlí an Chomhphobail a chur san áireamh, chomh maith leis an taithí phraiticiúil atá faighte sa chomhthéacs seo.Dá bhrí sin, ní féidir leis na Ballstáit cuspóir an togra a chur i gcrích go leordhóthanach.- Prionsabal na comhréireachtaIn Airteagal 5 de Chonradh AE dearbhaítear nach rachaidh aon ghníomhaíocht de chuid an Chomhphobail thar a bhfuil riachtanach chun cuspóirí an Chonartha a bhaint amach. Ní foláir gur féidir leis an togra a chuspóir a chur i gcrích agus a chur chun feidhme ar bhealach chomh héifeachtúil agus is féidir leis an bhfoirm a roghnaítear le haghaidh na gníomhaíochta Comhphobail seo. Is éard atá sa tionscnamh a bheartaítear — leasú ar Rialachán — forbairt bhreise ar acquis Schengen lena ndéantar eagrú inimirce neamhdhlíthiúil a chomhrac agus lena n-áirithítear comhar idir ranna ábhartha riaracháin na mBallstát, agus idir na ranna sin agus an Coimisiún chomh maith. Comhlíonann an togra prionsabal na comhréireachta mar sin.- Rogha ionstraimeIonstraim bheartaithe: rialachán.Ní bheadh modhanna eile leordhóthanach mar go leasaítear rialachán leis an togra reatha4. IMPLEACHT BHUISÉADACHNíl aon impleacht ag an togra le haghaidh bhuiséad an Chomhphobail.5. FAISNÉIS BHREISE- Iarmhairt na bprótacal éagsúil atá i gceangal leis na Conarthaí agus na gcomhaontuithe comhlachais a cuireadh i gcrích le tríú tíorthaTá an bonn dlíthiúil don togra seo le fáil i dTeideal IV de Chonradh CE, agus dá bharr sin tá feidhm ag an gcóras 'geoiméadracht athraitheach', dá bhforáiltear i bprótacail maidir le seasamh na Ríochta Aontaithe, Éireann agus na Danmhairge agus i bprótacal Schengen.Cuireann an togra le acquis Schengen. Ní foláir na hiarmhairtí seo a leanas i ndáil leis na prótacail éagsúla a mheas dá bhrí sin:An Ríocht Aontaithe agus ÉireTá an Ríocht Aontaithe ag glacadh páirte sa Rialachán seo i gcomhréir le hAirteagal 5 den Phrótacal, ag lánpháirtiú acquis Schengen i gcreat an Aontais Eorpaigh, atá i gceangal le Conradh AE agus le Conradh CE agus Airteagal 8(2) de Chinneadh 2000/365/CE ón gComhairle an 29 Bealtaine 2000 maidir le hiarraidh ó Ríocht Aontaithe na Breataine Móire agus Thuaisceart Éireann páirt a ghlacadh i roinnt forálacha de acquis Schengen.Tá Éire ag glacadh páirte sa Rialachán seo i gcomhréir le hAirteagal 5 den Phrótacal, ag lánpháirtiú acquis Schengen i gcreat an Aontais Eorpaigh, atá i gceangal le Conradh AE agus le Conradh CE agus Airteagal 6(2) de Chinneadh 2002/192/CE ón gComhairle an 28 Feabhra 2002 maidir le hiarraidh ó Éirinn páirt a ghlacadh i roinnt forálacha de acquis Schengen.An DanmhairgDe réir an Phrótacail maidir le seasamh na Danmhairge, atá i gceangal le Conradh AE agus Conradh CE, ní bheidh an Danmhairg rannpháirteach nuair a ghlacfaidh an Chomhairle bearta de bhun Theideal IV de Chonradh CE, cé is moite de 'bearta ag cinneadh na dtríú tíortha a mbeidh ar a náisiúnaigh víosa a bheith ina seilbh acu nuair a bheidh teorainneacha seachtracha na mBallstát á dtrasnú acu, nó bearta a bhaineann le formáid chomhionann do víosaí'.Cuireann an togra seo le acquis Schengen, agus de réir Airteagal 5 den Phrótacal 'cinnfidh an Danmhairg laistigh de thréimhse sé mhí tar éis don Chomhairle cinneadh a ghlacadh ar thogra nó tionscnamh chun cur le acquis Schengen faoi fhorálacha Theideal IV den Chonradh ag bunú an Chomhphobail Eorpaigh, an gcuirfidh sí an cinneadh sin chun feidhme ina dlí náisiúnta.'An Íoslainn agus an IoruaidhMaidir leis an Íoslainn agus an Ioruaidh, is éard atá sa togra seo forbairt ar fhorálacha acquis Schengen de réir bhrí an Chomhaontaithe arna chur i gcrích ag Comhairle an Aontais Eorpaigh agus Poblacht na hÍoslainne agus Ríocht na hIoruaidhe maidir le comhlachas an dá Stát i dtaca le cur chun feidhme, cur i bhfeidhm agus forbairt acquis Schengen[13].An EilvéisMaidir leis an Eilvéis, is éard atá sa togra seo forbairt ar fhorálacha acquis Schengen de réir bhrí an Chomhaontaithe arna chur i gcrích idir an tAontas Eorpach, an Comhphobal Eorpach agus Cónaidhm na hEilvéise maidir le comhlachas na Cónaidhme i dtaca le cur chun feidhme, cur i bhfeidhm agus forbairt acquis Schengen[14].LichtinstéinMaidir le Lichtinstéin, is éard atá sa togra seo forbairt ar fhorálacha acquis Schengen de réir bhrí an Phrótacail idir an tAontas Eorpach, an Comhphobal Eorpach, Cónaidhm na hEilvéise agus Prionsacht Lichtinstéin maidir le haontachas Phrionsacht Lichtinstéin leis an gComhaontú idir an tAontas Eorpach, an Comhphobal Eorpach agus Conaidhm na hEilvéise maidir le comhlachas Chónaidhm na hEilvéise i dtaca le cur chun feidhme, cur i bhfeidhm agus forbairt acquis Schengen[15].- Míniú mionsonraithe ar an tograAirteagal 1Sa chead mhír agus i bpointe (a) den dara mír, cuirtear chun cinn úsáid Líonra Faisnéise agus Comhordaithe slán bunaithe ar an ngréasán le haghaidh Seirbhísí Bainistithe Imirce Ballstát (ICONet) le haghaidh malartú faisnéise maidir le hoifigeach idirchaidrimh inimirce a phostú agus le haghaidh malartú faisnéise agus taithí praiticiúla i measc oifigeach idirchaidrimh inimirce.I bpointe (b) den dara mír áirithítear comhar níos dlúithe idir FRONTEX agus gréasáin ILO.I bpointe (c) den dara mír ceadaítear do Bhallstát ar bith — seachas an Ballstát a shealbhaíonn an Uachtaránacht nó a fheidhmíonn mar Uachtaránacht ghníomhach — cruinnithe oifigeach idirchaidrimh inimirce a thionól ar a thionscnamh féin.Sa tríú mír déantar simpliú ar an oibleagáid tuairiscithe faoin Rialachán. Déantar foráil ann freisin go bhfaighidh na hinstitiúidí Eorpacha ábhartha faisnéis go rialta maidir le gníomhaíochtaí na ngréasán oifigeach idirchaidrimh inimirce i réigiúin shonracha agus/nó i dtíortha sonracha a bhfuil suim ar leith ag an Aontas Eorpach iontu agus maidir leis an staid sna réigiúin agus/nó tíortha sin, i gcúrsaí a bhaineann le hinimirce neamhdhlíthiúil.2009/0098 (COD)Togra le haghaidhRIALACHÁIN Ó PHARLAIMINT NA hEORPA AGUS ÓN gCOMHAIRLEan [...]lena leasaítear Rialachán (CE) Uimh. 377/2004 ón gComhairle maidir le gréasán oifigeach idirchaidrimh inimirce a chruthúTÁ PARLAIMINT NA hEORPA AGUS COMHAIRLE AN AONTAIS EORPAIGHAg féachaint don Chonradh ag bunú an Chomhphobail Eorpaigh, agus go háirithe Airteagal 63(3)(b) agus Airteagal 66 de,Ag féachaint don togra ón gCoimisiún[16],Ag gníomhú dóibh i gcomhréir leis an nós imeachta a leagtar síos in Airteagal 251 den Chonradh,De bharr an méid seo a leanas:1. I Rialachán (CE) Uimh. 377/2004 ón gComhairle an 19 Feabhra 2004 maidir le gréasán oifigeach idirchaidrimh inimirce a chruthú[17] leagtar síos an oibleagáid maidir le cineálacha comhair a bhunú i measc oifigeach idirchaidrimh inimirce na mBallstát, cuspóirí an chomhair sin, feidhmeanna agus cáilíochtaí iomchuí na n-oifigeach idirchaidrimh sin, chomh maith lena bhfreagrachtaí i leith na tíre ostaí agus an Bhallstáit a sheolann.2. Le Cinneadh 2005/267/CE ón gComhairle[18] bunaíodh Líonra Faisnéise agus Comhordaithe slán bunaithe ar an ngréasán le haghaidh Seirbhísí Bainistithe Imirce Ballstát (ICONet) le haghaidh malartú faisnéise maidir le himirce neamhrialta, teacht isteach agus inimirce neamhdhlíthiúil agus filleadh cónaitheoirí neamhdhlíthiúla.Aireofar sna heilimintí le haghaidh malartú faisnéise na ngréasán oifigeach idirchaidrimh inimirce.3. Le Rialachán (CE) Uimh. 2007/2004 bunaíodh Gníomhaireacht Eorpach chun Comhar Oibríochtúil a Bhainistiú ag Teorainneacha Seachtracha Bhallstáit an Aontais Eorpaigh (FRONTEX)[19]. Beidh an cúram ar ghníomhaireacht FRONTEX anailísí riosca ginearálta agus sonracha a chur faoi bhráid na Comhairle agus an Choimisiúin.4. Ní foláir d'oifigigh idirchaidrimh inimirce faisnéis a bhailiú maidir le hinimirce neamhdhlíthiúil le húsáid ar leibhéal oibríochtúil nó ar leibhéal straitéiseach nó ar an dá leibhéal. D'fhéadfadh a leithéid d'fhaisnéis rannchuidiú go suntasach le gníomhaíochtaí ghníomhaireacht FRONTEX a bhaineann le hanailís riosca, agus ba cheart comhar níos dlúithe a bhunú idir na gréasáin oifigeach idirchaidrimh inimirce agus Gníomhaireacht FRONTEX chun na críche sin.5. Ba cheart go mbeadh gach Ballstát ábalta cruinniú a thionól ar a thionscnamh féin, nuair a mheastar é bheith iomchuí, idir na hoifigigh idirchaidrimh inimirce atá postaithe i dtríú tír áirithe nó réigiún áirithe, d'fhonn comhar a fheabhsú eatarthu.6. Le Cinneadh 574/2007/CE ó Pharlaimint na hEorpa agus ón gComhairle an 23 Bealtaine 2007 bunaítear, go ceann tréimhse ón 1 Eanáir 2007 go 31 Nollaig 2013, an Ciste um Theorainneacha Seachtracha faoi chuimsiú an Chláir Ghinearálta 'Dlúthpháirtíocht agus Bainistiú Sreabha Imirce[20]', d'fhonn rannchuidiú le neartú an limistéir saoirse, slándála agus ceartais agus ag cur prionsabal na dlúthpháirtíochta i bhfeidhm idir na Ballstáit. Féadfar na hacmhainní atá ar fáil ón gCiste seo a úsáid chun na gníomhaíochtaí arna n-eagrú ag seirbhísí consalachta agus seirbhísí eile na mBallstát i dtríú tíortha a fheabhsú agus chun tacú le neartú cumas oibríochtúil na ngréasán oifigeach idirchaidrimh inimirce, ag cur chun cinn dá dhroim sin comhar níos éifeachtúla trí bhíthin na ngréasán seo, idir na Ballstáit.7. Ba cheart go gcuirfí an Chomhairle, Parlaimint na hEorpa agus an Coimisiún ar an eolas go rialta maidir le gníomhaíochtaí na ngréasán oifigeach idirchaidrimh inimirce i réigiúin shonracha agus/nó i dtíortha sonracha a bhfuil suim ar leith ag an Aontas Eorpach iontu agus maidir leis an staid sna réigiúin agus/nó tíortha sin, i gcúrsaí a bhaineann le hinimirce neamhdhlíthiúil. Ba cheart go mbeadh roghnú na réigiún sonrach agus/nó na dtíortha sonracha a bhfuil suim ar leith ag an Aontas Eorpach iontu bunaithe ar tháscairí imirce oibiachtúla, amhail staidreamh maidir le himirce neamhdhlíthiúil agus anailísí riosca arna n-ullmhú ag Gníomhaireacht FRONTEX, agus ba cheart iad a bheith ag luí le beartas caidrimh eachtraigh an AE ina iomláine.8. Ba cheart Rialachán (CE) Uimh. 377/2004, dá bhrí sin, a leasú dá réir.9. Ós rud é nach féidir leis na Ballstáit, eadhon forálacha reatha an Chomhphobail maidir le cruthú agus feidhmú na ngréasán oifigeach idirchaidrimh inimirce a oiriúnú chun athruithe i ndlí an Chomhphobail a chur san áireamh, chomh maith le taithí phraiticiúil a fuarthas sa chomhthéacs seo, cuspóirí na gníomhaíochta atá beartaithe a chur i gcrích go leordhóthanach agus gur fearr is féidir iad a chur i gcrích ag leibhéal Comhphobail, féadfaidh an Comhphobal bearta a ghlacadh, i gcomhréir le prionsabal na coimhdeachta, mar atá leagtha amach in Airteagal 5 den Chonradh. I gcomhréir le prionsabal na coimhdeachta, mar atá leagtha amach san Airteagal sin, ní théann an Rialachán seo thar a bhfuil riachtanach chun na cuspóirí sin a baint amach.10. Urramaítear leis an Rialachán seo na cearta bunúsacha agus na prionsabail a aithnítear in Airteagal 6(2) de Chonradh an Aontais Eorpaigh agus atá léirithe sa Choinbhinsiún Eorpach chun Cearta an Duine agus Saoirsí Bunúsacha a Chosaint agus sa Chairt um Chearta Bunúsacha an Aontais Eorpaigh chomh maith.11. Tá an Ríocht Aontaithe ag glacadh páirte sa Rialachán seo i gcomhréir le hAirteagal 5 den Phrótacal, ag lánpháirtiú acquis Schengen i gcreat an Aontais Eorpaigh, atá i gceangal leis an gConradh ar an Aontas Eorpach agus leis an gConradh ag bunú an Chomhphobail Eorpaigh, agus Airteagal 8(2) de Chinneadh 2000/365/CE ón gComhairle an 29 Bealtaine 2000 maidir le hiarraidh ó Ríocht Aontaithe na Breataine Móire agus Thuaisceart Éireann páirt a ghlacadh i roinnt forálacha de acquis Schengen[21].12. Tá Éire ag glacadh páirte sa Rialachán seo i gcomhréir le hAirteagal 5 den Phrótacal, ag lánpháirtiú acquis Schengen i gcreat an Aontais Eorpaigh, atá i gceangal leis an gConradh ar an Aontas Eorpach agus leis an gConradh ag bunú an Chomhphobail Eorpaigh, agus Airteagal 6(2) de Chinneadh 2002/192/CE ón gComhairle an 28 Feabhra 2002 maidir le hiarraidh ó Éirinn páirt a ghlacadh i roinnt forálacha de acquis Schengen[22].13. I gcomhréir le hAirteagail 1 agus 2 den Phrótacal maidir le seasamh na Danmhairge atá i gceangal leis an gConradh ar an Aontas Eorpach agus leis an gConradh ag bunú an Chomhphobail Eorpaigh, ní bheidh an Danmhairg rannpháirteach i nglacadh an Rialacháin seo ná ní bheidh sé ina cheangal uirthi ná ní bheidh sí faoi réir a chur i bhfeidhm. I bhfianaise go gcuireann an Rialachán seo le acquis Schengen faoi fhorálacha Theideal IV de Chuid a Trí den Chonradh ag bunú an Chomhphobail Eorpaigh, ba cheart don Danmhairg, i gcomhréir le hAirteagal 5 den Phrótacal sin, cinneadh a dhéanamh laistigh de thréimhse sé mhí tar éis an Rialachán seo a ghlacadh an gcuirfeadh sí chun feidhme é ina dlí náisiúnta.14. Maidir leis an Íoslainn agus an Ioruaidh, is éard atá sa Rialachán seo forbairt ar fhorálacha acquis Schengen, de réir bhrí an Chomhaontaithe arna chur i gcrích ag Comhairle an Aontais Eorpaigh agus Poblacht na hÍoslainne agus Ríocht na hIoruaidhe maidir le comhlachas na hIoruaidhe i dtaca le cur chun feidhme, cur i bhfeidhm agus forbairt acquis Schengen[23], a thagann faoin ábhar dá dtagraítear in Airteagal 1, pointe A agus E de Chinneadh 1999/437/CE ón gComhairle[24] maidir le socruithe áirithe chun an Comhaontú sin a chur i bhfeidhm.15. Maidir leis an Eilvéis, is éard atá sa Rialachán seo forbairt ar fhorálacha acquis Schengen, de réir bhrí an Chomhaontaithe a síníodh idir an tAontas Eorpach, an Comhphobal Eorpach agus Cónaidhm na hEilvéise[25] maidir le comhlachas Chónaidhm na hEilvéise le cur chun feidhme, cur i bhfeidhm agus forbairt acquis Schengen, a thagann faoin ábhar dá dtagraítear in Airteagal 1, pointe A agus E de Chinneadh 1999/437/CE ón gComhairle arna léamh in éineacht le hAirteagal 3 de Chinneadh 2008/146/CE ón gComhairle[26].16. Maidir le Lichtinstéin, is éard atá sa Rialachán seo forbairt ar fhorálacha acquis Schengen de réir bhrí an Phrótacail a síníodh idir an tAontas Eorpach, an Comhphobal Eorpach, Cónaidhm na hEilvéise agus Prionsacht Lichtinstéin maidir le haontachas Phrionsacht Lichtinstéin leis an gComhaontú idir an tAontas Eorpach, an Comhphobal Eorpach agus Cónaidhm na hEilvéise maidir le comhlachas Chónaidhm na hEilvéise i dtaca le cur chun feidhme, cur i bhfeidhm agus forbairt acquis Schengen, a thagann faoin ábhar dá dtagraítear in Airteagal 1, pointe A agus E de Chinneadh 1999/437/CE ón gComhairle arna léamh in éineacht le hAirteagal 3 de Chinneadh 2008/261/CE ón gComhairle[27].TAR ÉIS AN RIALACHÁN A GHLACADH:Airteagal 1 LeasúLeasaítear Rialachán (CE) Uimh. 377/2004 mar a leanas:17. In Airteagal 3 scriostar an dara habairt i mír 1 agus cuirtear an mír (3) seo a leanas ina hionad:‘3. Cuirfear an fhaisnéis dá dtagraítear i míreanna (1) agus (2) ar fáil ar an Líonra Faisnéise agus Comhordaithe slán bunaithe ar an ngréasán le haghaidh Seirbhísí Bainistithe Imirce Ballstát arna bunú le Cinneadh 2005/267/CE ón gComhairle[28] (dá ngairtear anseo feasta "ICONet") faoin alt atá tiomnaithe do na gréasáin oifigeach idirchaidrimh inimirce. Cuirfidh an Coimisiún an fhaisnéis seo ar fáil don Chomhairle freisin'18. Leasaítear Airteagal 4 mar a leanas:(a) I mír 1 cuirtear an méid a leanas in ionad an dara fleasc:'- faisnéis agus taithí phraiticiúil a mhalartú, go háirithe ag cruinnithe agus trí bhíthin ICONet.'(b) cuirtear an méid seo a leanas in ionad mhír 2:‘2. Beidh ionadaithe an Choimisiúin agus Ghníomhaireacht FRONTEX arna bunú le Rialachán (CE) Uimh. 2007/2004 i dteideal páirt a ghlacadh sna cruinnithe arna n-eagrú faoi chuimsiú na ngréasán oifigeach idirchaidrimh inimirce, cé go bhféadfadh, i ngeall ar ghnéithe oibríochtúla, na cruinnithe a thionól gan na hionadaithe seo a bheith i láthair. Féadfar cuireadh a thabhairt do chomhlachtaí agus údaráis eile freisin, mar is iomchuí.'(c) I mír 3, cuirtear isteach an abairt seo a leanas:'Is féidir na cruinnithe sin a thionól ar thionscnamh Ballstát eile.'19. Cuirtear an méid seo a leanas in ionad Airteagal 6:‘1. Maidir leis an mBallstát a shealbhaíonn Uachtaránacht Chomhairle an Aontais Eorpaigh nó, mura ndéantar ionadaíocht thar ceann an Bhallstáit seo sa tír ná sa réigiún, maidir leis an mBallstát atá ag fónamh mar Uachtaránacht ghníomhach, tarraingeoidh sé suas agus cuirfidh sé faoi bhráid na Comhairle, Pharlaimint na hEorpa agus an Choimisiúin, faoi dheireadh gach seimeastair, tuarascáil ar ghníomhaíochtaí na ngréasán oifigeach idirchaidrimh inimirce i réigiúin shonracha agus/nó i dtíortha sonracha a bhfuil suim ar leith ag an Aontas Eorpach iontu, agus freisin ar an staid sna réigiúin agus/nó tíortha sin, i gcúrsaí a bhaineann le hinimirce neamhdhlíthiúil. Ba cheart go mbeadh roghnú na réigiún sonrach agus/nó na dtíortha sonracha a bhfuil suim ar leith ag an Aontas Eorpach iontu bunaithe ar tháscairí imirce oibiachtúla, amhail staidreamh maidir le himirce neamhdhlíthiúil agus anailísí riosca arna n-ullmhú ag Gníomhaireacht FRONTEX, agus ba cheart iad a bheith ag luí le beartas caidrimh eachtraigh an AE ina iomláine.2. Tarraingeofar suas na tuarascálacha sin i gcomhréir leis an múnla arna bhunú le Cinneadh 2005/687/CE ón gCoimisiún[29] agus léireofar iontu na critéir roghnúcháin ábhartha.3. Déanfaidh an Coimisiún, ar bhonn na dtuarascálacha thuasluaite, achoimre fhíorasach a chur ar fáil don Chomhairle agus do Pharlaimint na hEorpa, ar bhonn bliantúil, maidir le forbairt na ngréasán oifigeach idirchaidrimh inimirce.'Airteagal 2 Teacht i bhfeidhmTiocfaidh an Rialachán seo i bhfeidhm an fichiú lá tar éis lá a fhoilsithe in Iris Oifigiúil an Aontais Eorpaigh.Beidh an Rialachán seo ina cheangal go huile is go hiomlán agus beidh sé infheidhme go díreach i ngach Ballstát i gcomhréir leis an gConradh ag bunú an Chomhphobail Eorpaigh.Arna dhéanamh sa Bhruiséil, [...]Thar ceann Pharlaimint na hEorpa Thar ceann na ComhairleAn tUachtarán An tUachtarán[...] [...] [1] IO L 64, 2.3.2004, lch 1.[2] IO L 349, 25.11.2004, lch 1.[3] IO L 83, 1.4.2005, lch 48.[4] C (2005) 5159 leagan deireanach.[5] Cinneadh ón gCoimisiún an 29 Meán Fómhair 2005, IO L 264, 8.10.2005, lch 8.[6] IO L 144, 6.6.2007, lch 22.[7] COIM(2008) 359 leagan deireanach.[8] Doic. 13440/08 ón gComhairle.[9] IO L 83, 1.4.2005, lch 48.[10] C (2005) 5159 leagan deireanach.[11] C(2007) 374.[12] Cinneadh ón gComhairle an 22 Nollaig 2004 ina ndéantar foráil do réimsí áirithe a chumhdaítear i dTeideal IV de Chuid a Trí den Chonradh ag bunú an Chomhphobail Eorpaigh atá le rialú leis an nós imeachta atá leagtha síos in Airteagal 251 den Chonradh sin, IO L 396, 31.12.2004, lch 45.[13] IO L 176, 10.7.1999, lch 36.[14] IO L 53, 27.2.2008, lch 52.[15] IO L [...], [...], lch [...].[16] IO L [...], [...], lch [...].[17] IO L 64, 2.3.2004, lch 1.[18] IO L 83, 1.4.2005, lch 48.[19] IO L 349, 25.11.2004, lch 1.[20] IO L 144, 6.6.2007, lch 22.[21] IO L 131, 1.6.2000, lch 43.[22] IO L 64, 7.3.2002, lch 20.[23] IO L 176, 10.7.1999, lch 36.[24] IO L 176, 10.7.1999, lch 31.[25] IO L 53, 27.2.2008, lch 1.[26] IO L 53, 27.2.2008, lch 1.[27] IO L 83, 26.3.2008, lch 3.[28] IO L 83, 1.4.2005, lch 48.[29] IO L 264, 8.10.2005, lch 8.


text:
Code de la sécurité sociale - Article L841-1 | Legifrance
 Vous êtes dans : Accueil> Les codes en vigueur> Code de la sécurité sociale - Article L841-1
 Code de la sécurité sociale - Article L841-1
 I° Une aide est attribuée au ménage ou à la personne seule employant une assistante maternelle définie à l'article 123-1 du code de la famille et de l'aide sociale pour assurer la garde, au domicile de celle-ci, d'au moins un enfant à charge d'un âge déterminé.
 Cette aide est attribuée pour chaque enfant à condition que la rémunération correspondante de l'assistante maternelle ne dépasse pas un montant fixé par décret.
 Le montant de l'aide est égal à celui des cotisations patronales et salariales d'origine légale ou conventionnelle imposées par la loi, dues pour l'emploi de l'assistante maternelle agréée et calculées sur le salaire réel.
 II° L'aide visée au I est assortie d'une majoration d'un montant variant avec l'âge de l'enfant et fixé par décret en pourcentage de la base mentionnée à l'article L. 551-1. Ce montant ne peut excéder le salaire net servi à l'assistante maternelle agréée.
 [*Nota : Loi 91-1406 du 31 décembre art. 18 IX : les dispositions du présent article entrent en vigueur le 1er janvier 1992 pour les périodes d'emploi postérieures à cette date.*]
 Code de la famille et de l'aide sociale. - art. 123-1 (M)
 Décret n°46-2769 du 27 novembre 1946 - art. 207 (V)
 Loi n°91-1406 du 31 décembre 1991 - art. 17 (Ab)
 Décret n°2004-189 du 27 février 2004 - art. 2 (V)
 Décret n°2009-404 du 15 avril 2009 - art. 16 (V)
 LOI n°2015-994 du 17 août 2015 - art. 58
 LOI n°2015-994 du 17 août 2015 - art. 59, v. init.
 Décret n°2015-1709 du 21 décembre 2015 - art. 3, v. init.
 Ordonnance n°2016-160 du 18 février 2016 - art. 3
 Décret n°2016-842 du 24 juin 2016 - art. 5, v. init.
 LOI n°2016-1088 du 8 août 2016 - art. 99, v. init.
 Décret n°2016-1951 du 28 décembre 2016 - art. 1
 Code de l'action sociale et des familles - art. D262-57 (Ab)
 Code de l'action sociale et des familles - art. L262-27-1 (VD)
 Code de l'action sociale et des familles - art. L421-5 (M)
 Code de l'action sociale et des familles - art. L421-9 (VT)
 Code de l'action sociale et des familles - art. R245-48 (V)
 Code de l'action sociale et des familles - art. R262-18 (VD)
 Code de l'action sociale et des familles - art. R522-64 (VD)
 Code de la famille et de l'aide sociale. - art. 123-1-4 (Ab)
 Code de la sécurité sociale. - art. D523-2 (VD)
 Code de la sécurité sociale. - art. D841-1 (Ab)
 Code de la sécurité sociale. - art. D841-2 (Ab)
 Code de la sécurité sociale. - art. D841-3 (Ab)
 Code de la sécurité sociale. - art. D841-5 (Ab)
 Code de la sécurité sociale. - art. L114-16-2 (VD)
 Code de la sécurité sociale. - art. L757-4 (Ab)
 Code de la sécurité sociale. - art. L757-5 (M)
 Code de la sécurité sociale. - art. L821-5-1 (VD)
 Code de la sécurité sociale. - art. L841-4 (Ab)
 Code de la sécurité sociale. - art. R841-1 (Ab)
 Code du travail - art. L5425-3 (VD)
 Code du travail - art. R5131-24 (VD)
 Code du travail applicable à Mayotte. - art. D324-16 (V)
 Code du travail applicable à Mayotte. - art. R324-21 (V)


text:
 17.12.2020
 BG
 Официален вестник на Европейския съюз
 L 426/15
 РЕГЛАМЕНТ ЗА ИЗПЪЛНЕНИЕ (ЕС) 2020/2118 НА КОМИСИЯТА
 от 16 декември 2020 година
 за подновяване на разрешението за употреба на Pediococcus pentosaceus DSM 16244 като фуражна добавка за всички видове животни и за отмяна на Регламент (ЕС) No 514/2010
 (текст от значение за ЕИП)
 ЕВРОПЕЙСКАТА КОМИСИЯ,
 като взе предвид Договора за функционирането на Европейския съюз,
 като взе предвид Регламент (ЕО) No 1831/2003 на Европейския парламент и на Съвета от 22 септември 2003 г. относно добавки за използване при храненето на животните (1), и по-специално член 9, параграф 2 от него,
 като има предвид, че:
 (1)
 В Регламент (ЕО) No 1831/2003 се предвижда разрешителен режим за добавките, предвидени за употреба при храненето на животните, и се посочват основанията и процедурите за предоставянето и подновяването на такова разрешение.
 (2)
 Употребата на Pediococcus pentosaceus DSM 16244 като фуражна добавка за всички видове животни беше разрешена за период от 10 години с Регламент (ЕС) No 514/2010 на Комисията (2).
 (3)
 В съответствие с член 14 от Регламент (ЕО) No 1831/2003 беше подадено заявление за подновяване на разрешението за употреба на Pediococcus pentosaceus DSM 16244 като фуражна добавка за всички видове животни, с искане добавката да се класифицира в категория „технологични добавки“. Заявлението беше придружено от данните и документите, изисквани съгласно член 14, параграф 2 от посочения регламент.
 (4)
 В становището си от 25 май 2020 г. (3) Европейският орган за безопасност на храните („Органът“) заключи, че заявителят е предоставил доказателства, че добавката отговаря на действащите условия за разрешаване. Органът заключи, че Pediococcus pentosaceus DSM 16244 не се отразява неблагоприятно върху здравето на животните и безопасността на потребителите, нито върху околната среда. Той заключи също така, че добавката не дразни кожата или очите, но се счита за кожен и респираторен сенсибилизатор. Поради това Комисията смята, че следва да бъдат взети съответните предпазни мерки, за да се предотврати неблагоприятно въздействие върху здравето на човека, по-специално по отношение на потребителите на добавката.
 (5)
 При оценката на Pediococcus pentosaceus DSM 16244 беше установено, че предвидените в член 5 от Регламент (ЕО) No 1831/2003 условия за издаване на разрешение са изпълнени. Поради това разрешението за употреба на посочената добавка следва да бъде подновено съгласно предвиденото в приложението към настоящия регламент.
 (6)
 С оглед на подновяването на разрешението за употреба на Pediococcus pentosaceus DSM 16244 като фуражна добавка при условията, определени в приложението към настоящия регламент, Регламент (ЕС) No 514/2010 следва да бъде отменен.
 (7)
 Мерките, предвидени в настоящия регламент, са в съответствие със становището на Постоянния комитет по растенията, животните, храните и фуражите,
 ПРИЕ НАСТОЯЩИЯ РЕГЛАМЕНТ:
 Член 1
 Подновява се разрешението за посочената в приложението добавка, която принадлежи към категория „технологични добавки“ и към функционална група „добавки за силаж“, при спазване на условията, определени в същото приложение.
 Член 2
 Регламент (ЕС) No 514/2010 се отменя.
 Член 3
 Настоящият регламент влиза в сила на двадесетия ден след деня на публикуването му в Официален вестник на Европейския съюз.
 Настоящият регламент е задължителен в своята цялост и се прилага пряко във всички държави членки.
 Съставено в Брюксел на 16 декември 2020 година.
 За Комисията
 Председател
 Ursula VON DER LEYEN
 (1) ОВ L 268, 18.10.2003 г., стр. 29.
 (2) Регламент (ЕС) No 514/2010 на Комисията от 15 юни 2010 г. относно разрешителното за използване на Pediococcus pentosaceus (DSM 16244) като фуражна добавка за всички видове животни (ОВ L 150, 16.6.2010 г., стр. 42).
 (3) EFSA Journal (Бюлетин на ЕОБХ) 2020;18(6):6166.
 ПРИЛОЖЕНИЕ
 Идентификационен номер на добавката
 Добавка
 Състав, химична формула, описание, метод за анализ
 Вид или категория на животните
 Максимална възраст
 Минимално съдържание
 Максимално съдържание
 Други разпоредби
 Срок на валидност на разрешението
 CFU/kg пресен материал
 Категория: „технологични добавки“. Функционална група: „добавки за силаж“.
 1k2101
 Pediococcus pentosaceus DSM 16244
 Състав на добавката
 Препарат от Pediococcus pentosaceus DSM 16244 с минимално съдържание на 4 × 1011 CFU/g добавка.
 Всички видове животни
 -
 -
 -
 1.
 В упътването за употреба на добавката и премиксите се посочват условията на съхранение.
 2.
 Минимално съдържание на добавката, когато не се използва в комбинация с други микроорганизми като добавки за силаж: 1×108 CFU/kg пресен материал.
 3.
 Операторите в сектора на фуражите трябва да установят оперативни процедури и да предвидят организационни мерки за потребителите на добавката и премиксите за преодоляване на потенциалните рискове в резултат на употребата ѝ. Когато тези рискове не могат да бъдат отстранени или сведени до минимум чрез споменатите процедури и мерки, добавката и премиксите се използват с лични предпазни средства, включително ръкавици и предпазна дихателна маска.
 6.1.2031 г.
 Характеристика на активното вещество:
 Pediococcus pentosaceus DSM 16244.
 Метод за анализ
 (1)
 —
 Преброяване: метод чрез разстилане върху пластина на MRS агар (EN 15786).
 —
 Идентификация: метод на пулсовата гел електрофореза (PFGE).
 (1) Подробна информация за методите за анализ може да бъде намерена на интернет адреса на референтната лаборатория:https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en/eurl/feed-additives/evaluation-reports