type: other

text:
Holocaust Memory and Antisemitism in Lithuania: Reversed Memories of the Second World War
 Author(s): Malinauskaite, Gintare
 Topics: Main Topic: Antisemitism, Antisemitism, Holocaust, Holocaust Commemoration, Memory
 Rekomendacijos dėl veiksmų kovojant su antisemitizmu ir romafobija Lietuvoje, 2018 m.
 Translated Title: Recommendations for action against anti-Semitism and Romaphobia in Lithuania, 2018
 Topics: Antisemitism, Holocaust Education, Holocaust Commemoration, Main Topic: Antisemitism, Racism, Roma, Policy
 Abstract: #AtmintisAtsakomybeAteitis
 Atmintis. Atsakomybė. Ateitis. Tai yra nuoseklūs laiptai, vedantys link realių teigiamų pokyčių
 visuomenėje. Demokratijos ir tolerancijos ateitis priklauso nuo atminties ir prisiimtos atsakomybės,
 leidžiančių žengti toliau. Žingsnis į ateitį – apžvelgus, įvertinus ir pasirėmus geriausių iniciatyvų prieš
 diskriminaciją patirtimi – toks yra šio projekto tikslas.
 Nuosekliai dirbant žmogaus teisių užtikrinimo ir tolerancijos sklaidos bei švietimo srityje Lietuvos žydų
 Lietuvos žydų (litvakų) bendruomenė subūrė ekspertų grupę iš Lietuvos žmogaus teisių ekspertų,
 bendruomenių aktyvistų, akademinės visuomenės atstovų ir užsienio ekspertų. Ši grupė ėmėsi ambicingos
 užduoties - kurti veiksmingas ir kokybiškas rekomendacijas dėl veiksmų, kovojant su antisemitizmu ir
 romafobija Lietuvoje.
 Inicijavusi tyrimus ir remdamasi jų rezultatais, pasitelkusi mokslinius darbus bei geruosius pavyzdžius,
 analizuoti projektai ir socialines iniciatyvos, prisidėjusios prie ksenofobijos apraiškų mažinimo Lietuvos
 visuomenėje. Grupė ekspertų ruošė rekomendacijas ir išvadas, apie veiksmus, kurie geriausiai pasiekia
 tikslines grupes ir turi esminį poveikį, skleidžiant toleranciją, keičiant visuomenės požiūrį į žydų bei romų
 tautines bendruomenes, bei integruojant pažeidžiamiausias grupes į visuomenę.
 Naujosios rekomendacijos teikiamos EVZ fondui ir viešinamos Europos sąjungos lygmeniu.
 Šių rekomendacijų pagrindu EVZ fondas formuos tolimesnių programų gaires, kovojant su antisemitizmo,
 romafobijos ir ksenofobijos apraiškomis Europos šalyse. Jomis vadovaujantis, bus siekiama efektyviai
 šalinti Lietuvos visuomenėje netoleranciją skatinančius stereotipus, mažinti atskirtį tarp etninių sluoksnių,
 užkirsti kelią įvairioms neapykantos „kitokiems“ apraiškoms.
 Projektą lydėjo informacinė kampanija #AtmintisAtsakomybeAteitis socialiniuose tinkluose, ruošti
 straipsniai Lietuvos žiniasklaidoje, įvairūs renginiai, orientuoti į visuomenės švietimą apie tragišką žydų ir
 romų patirtį Holokausto metu ir sklaidantys ksenofobinius mitus.
 Sukurtos rekomendacijos pristatytos baigiamojoje tarptautinėje konferencijoje, skirtoje paminėti
 tarptautinę dieną prieš fašizmą ir antisemitizmą. Konferencija bei kiti renginiai padėjo plėtoti efektyvų valdžios institucijų ir nevyriausybinio sektoriaus dialogą, pasidalinti patirtimi ir rekomendacijomis, siekiant
 užtikrinti tautinių bendruomenių teisių ir laisvių įtvirtinimą bei įgyvendinimą, demokratinių procesų ir
 pilietinės visuomenės Lietuvoje stiprinimą ir tolerancijos sklaidą.
 Lietuvos žydų (litvakų) bendruomenė projektą vykdė kartu su partneriais:
 Projektą „Rekomendacijų dėl veiksmų kovojant su antisemitizmu ir romafobija Lietuvoje, paruošimas ir
 viešinimas“ rėmė:
 EVZ fondas (Vokietija). („Erinnerung, Verantwortung, Zukunft“ vok. – tai „Atmintis, Atsakomybė,
 Ateitis“ liet). Fondas remia sistemingus ir ilgalaikius tyrimus, analizuojančius romų ir žydų diskriminavimą
 bei marginalizaciją Europoje.
 Disinformation and Antisemitism: Holocaust Denial in the Baltic States, 1945–1999
 Author(s): Levin, Dov
 Editor(s): Roth, John K.; Maxwell, Elizabeth; Levy, Margot; Whitworth, Wendy
 Topics: Main Topic: Antisemitism, Holocaust Denial
 Abstract: Although this article presumes to focus on all three of the important phenomena expressed in its title, in the post-Holocaust reality they often commingle and cannot always be differentiated properly. In the main, this is said about the problem of distinguishing between general denial of the Holocaust and partial denial, which includes components of disinformation and distortion. All of them frequently interrelate with the new forms of antisemitism. Be this as it may, this article will attempt to present several facts that represent our knowledge of these phenomena in respect to the Holocaust in the three Baltic countries, Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia.
 Topics: Main Topic: Antisemitism, Antisemitism, Antisemitism: Monitoring, Surveys, European Union
 Abstract: Summary:
 This Special Eurobarometer survey on 'perceptions of antisemitism' was carried out in December 2018 and presents a snapshot of the way European perceive antisemitism.
 The Report shows that perceptions among Europeans on this issue are very divided - while every other European considers Antisemitism to be a problem in their country, 4 in 10 Europeans actually do not consider it to be an issue in their country. The results also show that there is a perception gap on Antisemitism: while 89% of Jews say that Antisemitism significantly increased over a period of 5 years, only 36% of the general public consider it has indeed increased.
 Holocaust Remembrance Project: How European Countries Treat Their Wartime Past
 Author(s): Echikson, William
 Topics: Main Topic: Holocaust and Memorial, Holocaust Commemoration, Holocaust Denial, Holocaust Education, Memory, Nationalism, Restitution and Reparations, Antisemitism
 Abstract: This first-ever report rating individual European Union countries on how they face up their Holocaust pasts was published on January 25, 2019 to coincide with UN Holocaust Remembrance Day. Researchers from Yale and Grinnell Colleges travelled throughout Europe to conduct the research. Representatives from the European Union of Progressive Judaism (EUPJ) have endorsed their work.
 ●Many European Union governments are rehabilitating World War II collaborators and war criminals while minimising their own guilt in the attempted extermination of Jews.
 ●Revisionism is worst in new Central European members - Poland, Hungary, Croatia and Lithuania.
 ●But not all Central Europeans are moving in the wrong direction: two exemplary countries living up to their tragic histories are the Czech Republic and Romania. The Romanian model of appointing an independent commission to study the Holocaust should be duplicated.
 ●West European countries are not free from infection - Italy, in particular, needs to improve.
 ●In the west, Austria has made a remarkable turn-around while France stands out for its progress in accepting responsibility for the Vichy collaborationist government.
 ●Instead of protesting revisionist excesses, Israel supports many of the nationalist and revisionist governments.
 Fourth Survey of European Jewish Community Leaders and Professionals, 2018
 Author(s): Kosmin, Barry A.
 Topics: Antisemitism, Fundraising and Philanthropy, Israel Attachment, Jewish Continuity, Religious Denominations, Security, Surveys, Jewish Leadership, Jewish Organisations, Main Topic: Identity and Community, Jewish Identity
 Abstract: The Fourth Survey of European Jewish Community Leaders and Professionals, 2018 presents the results of an online survey offered in 10 languages and administered to 893 respondents in 29 countries. Conducted every three years using the same format, the survey seeks to identify trends and their evolution in time.
 The survey asked Jewish lay leaders and community professionals questions regarding future community priorities, identifying the main threats to Jewish life, views on the safety and security situation in their cities, including emergency preparedness, and opinions on an array of internal community issues. Examples include conversions, membership criteria policies on intermarriage, and their vision of Europe and Israel.
 The respondents were comprised of presidents and chairpersons of nationwide “umbrella organizations” or Federations; presidents and executive directors of private Jewish foundations, charities, and other privately funded initiatives; presidents and main representatives of Jewish communities that are organized at a city level; executive directors and programme coordinators, as well as current and former board members of Jewish organizations; among others.
 The JDC International Centre for Community Development established the survey as a means to identify the priorities, sensibilities and concerns of Europe’s top Jewish leaders and professionals working in Jewish institutions, taking into account the changes that European Jewry has gone through since 1989, and the current political challenges and uncertainties in the continent. In a landscape with few mechanisms that can truly gauge these phenomena, the European Jewish Community Leaders Survey is an essential tool for analysis and applied research in the field of community development.
 The Survey team was directed by Dr. Barry Kosmin (Trinity College), who has conducted several large national social surveys and opinion polls in Europe, Africa and the U.S., including the CJF 1990 US National Jewish Population Survey.
 Yiddish, Jewish Russian, and Jewish Lithuanian in the Former Soviet Union
 Author(s): Verschik, Anna
 Editor(s): Hary, Benjamin; Benor`, Sarah Bunin
 Topics: Main Topic: Other, Yiddish, Language, Linguistics, Russian-Speaking Jews
 Post-Soviet Jewish Demographic Dynamics: An Analysis of Recent Data
 Editor(s): DellaPergola, Sergio; Rebhun, Uzi
 Topics: Main Topic: Demography and Migration, Demography, Russian Emigration
 Abstract: FSU Jewish numerical dynamics and emigration are presented. The demographic characteristics of the Jews today in different FSU countries and some parts of the Russian Federation are analyzed in comparison with those of Soviet Jewry at the onset of the mass emigration of the 1990s.
 Repress, Reassess, Remember: Jewish Heritage in Lithuania
 Author(s): Toleikis, Vytautas
 Topics: Memory, Jewish Heritage, Main Topic: Culture and Heritage, Holocaust Commemoration
 Abstract: Very important centres of East European Jewish life used to be located
 on the territory of modern Lithuania. Almost all of the Jews living there
 were murdered by the Nazis and their Lithuanian accomplices. In the
 Soviet Union, commemoration of the Jews and the preservation of their
 heritage were taboo. This changed with Lithuanian independence. However,
 the acceptance of co-responsibility in the murder of Lithuania’s
 Jews has met with resistance within the political world. The refusal to
 prosecute alleged perpetrators of the Holocaust is one vexing example.
 However, the place of Lithuanian Jewish heritage is increasingly secure
 in the view of history now found in society at large and among young
 people in particular.
 Forgotten Memory The Jews of Vilne in the Diaspora
 Author(s): Lipphardt, Anna
 Topics: Main Topic: Holocaust and Memorial, Memory, Jewish Heritage, Diaspora
 Abstract: The way East European Jews are remembered is subject to increasing examination, but very little is known about how East European Jews remember. Most Holocaust survivors did not return to their hometowns and villages, but settled around the world. Jewish hometown associations, or landsmanshaftn, kept alive the memory of the places they had left behind, and the Holocaust. This is seen in the case of the Jews of Vilnius, or Vilne as it is called in Yiddish. The way they view the past differs fundamentally from the way Jews still living in Vilnius see it. This contains the potential for conflict over cultural heritage and the interpretation of history, as evidenced in the dispute over materials from the YIVO Institute for Jewish Research.
 Post-Soviet Jewish Demography, 1989-2004
 Editor(s): Gitelman, Zvi; Ro'i, Yaakov
 Topics: Soviet Jewry, Main Topic: Demography and Migration, Demography, Censuses, Migration, Aliyah
 Post-Soviet Jewish Demographic Dynamics: An Analysis of Recent Data [Revised as of February 18, 2018]
 Topics: Main Topic: Demography and Migration, Demography, Censuses, Ageing and the Elderly, Aliyah, Emigration
 Abstract: Results of the recent censuses of the FSU countries clearly demonstrated that Jewish demographic decline has transpired rather quickly in most of them. Our analysis shows that aging reached a very advanced level among all post-Soviet Jews, with the exception of those in Azerbaijan. Especially high indicators of aging were found in Belarus and St. Petersburg. Based on the data of Russian censuses we also found that low fertility persisted among the Jewish population. Germany and the USA ceased to be a major destination for ex-Soviet Jewish emigration as immigration rules became more stringent in these countries. At the same time, a severe economic crisis led to a great increase in emigration from Russia and Ukraine to Israel in recent years, whereas return migration, as seen in Russian data, reached its lowest level.
 Bringing the Dark Past to Light The Reception of the Holocaust in Postcommunist Europe
 Editor(s): Himka, John-Paul; Michlic, Joanna Beata
 Topics: Main Topic: Holocaust and Memorial, Memory, National Identity, Antisemitism, Holocaust Memorials, Holocaust Survivors, Holocaust Commemoration, Jewish Revival, Post-1989, Communism, Jewish - Non - Jewish Relations
 Abstract: Despite the Holocaust’s profound impact on the history of Eastern Europe, the communist regimes successfully repressed public discourse about and memory of this tragedy. Since the collapse of communism in 1989, however, this has changed. Not only has a wealth of archival sources become available, but there have also been oral history projects and interviews recording the testimonies of eyewitnesses who experienced the Holocaust as children and young adults. Recent political, social, and cultural developments have facilitated a more nuanced and complex understanding of the continuities and discontinuities in representations of the Holocaust. People are beginning to realize the significant role that memory of Holocaust plays in contemporary discussions of national identity in Eastern Europe.
 John-Paul Himka and Joanna Beata Michlic
 1. "Our Conscience Is Clean": Albanian Elites and the Memory of the Holocaust in Postsocialist Albania
 2. The Invisible Genocide: The Holocaust in Belarus
 3. Contemporary Responses to the Holocaust in Bosnia and Herzegovina
 4. Debating the Fate of Bulgarian Jews during World War II
 5. Representations of the Holocaust and Historical Debates in Croatia since 1989
 6. The Sheep of Lidice: The Holocaust and the Construction of Czech National History
 7. Victim of History: Perceptions of the Holocaust in Estonia
 8. Holocaust Remembrance in the German Democratic Republic--and Beyond
 9. The Memory of the Holocaust in Postcommunist Hungary
 Part 1: The Politics of Holocaust Memory
 Part 2: Cinematic Memory of the Holocaust
 10. The Transformation of Holocaust Memory in Post-Soviet Latvia
 11. Conflicting Memories: The Reception of the Holocaust in Lithuania
 Saulius Sužied<edot>lis and Šarūnas Liekis
 12. The Combined Legacies of the "Jewish Question" and the "Macedonian Question"
 13. Public Discourses on the Holocaust in Moldova: Justification, Instrumentalization, and Mourning
 14. The Memory of the Holocaust in Post-1989 Poland: Renewal--Its Accomplishments and Its Powerlessness
 Joanna B. Michlic and Małgorzata Melchior
 15. Public Perceptions of the Holocaust in Postcommunist Romania
 Felicia Waldman and Mihai Chioveanu
 16. The Reception of the Holocaust in Russia: Silence, Conspiracy, and Glimpses of Light
 17. Between Marginalization and Instrumentalization: Holocaust Memory in Serbia since the Late 1980s
 18. The "Unmasterable Past"? The Reception of the Holocaust in Postcommunist Slovakia
 Nina Paulovičová
 19. On the Periphery: Jews, Slovenes, and the Memory of the Holocaust
 Gregor Joseph Kranjc
 20. The Reception of the Holocaust in Postcommunist Ukraine
 The Holocaust is a Foreign Country: Comparing Representations of Place in Lithuanian Jewish Testimony
 Author(s): Pollin-Galay, Hannah
 Topics: Main Topic: Holocaust and Memorial, Holocaust Survivors, Holocaust, Oral History and Biography, Interviews, Geography, Diaspora, Yiddish
 Abstract: This article explores discourse on the Holocaust as a ‘placeless’ event. Analyzing survivor testimony delivered in different cultural contexts, I ask whether or not the idea of strange or vanished places is culturally specific or universal to memories of Holocaust victimhood. As a case study, I analyze the testimony of Lithuanian Jewish Holocaust survivors. I compare the more commonly heard testimonies of survivors living in North America and Israel to the lesser known voices of survivors who have remained in Lithuania—witnesses who live and testify ‘on the scene of the crime.’ I demonstrate how important the idea of estranged geography figures in the testimony of émigré witnesses. By contrast, the survivors who have remained in Lithuania draw a different narrative map of the country, one in which past and present interact on the same sites. Their home landscape, however, also has black holes, dark places that they consider untouchable in everyday life. The article thus points to a tension between contextual particularities and universal challenges in depicting Holocaust places.
 Ecologies of Witnessing Language, Place, and Holocaust Testimony
 Topics: Main Topic: Holocaust and Memorial, Holocaust, Holocaust Survivors, Memory, Yiddish, Oral History and Biography, Interviews
 Abstract: An innovative reassessment of Holocaust testimony, revealing the dramatic ways in which the languages and places of postwar life inform survivor memory
 Based on the oral histories of Lithuanian Jews who survived the Holocaust, this book explores how the languages and places of postwar life shape personal narratives. Comparing the testimonies of survivors who remained in Lithuania and those who resettled in Israel and North America, Pollin-Galay’s groundbreaking work demonstrates how people draw from their linguistic and physical environments in order to understand their own suffering on emotional, political, and cultural levels.
 Naming the Criminal: Lithuanian Jews Remember Perpetrators
 Topics: Main Topic: Holocaust and Memorial, Memory, Oral History and Biography, Yiddish, Holocaust Survivors, Holocaust, Interviews
 Abstract: Psychoanalyst Dori Laub asserts that for camp inmates the Holocaust extinguished the possibility of “I-thou” interaction. Address and response, the basis of human subjectivity, became impossible for the prisoner to imagine. The author of this article uses victims’ descriptions of perpetrators to investigate this assertion. Do survivors at times conceive of a wartime assailant as “you”—as an addressable human agent? Comparing two clusters of testimony by Lithuanian Jews, the author finds that contemporary language and social context shape the victims’ stance toward Holocaust perpetration—that is, how they weigh human versus structural wrong. She also points out various ethical traps inherent in each of the two methods of remembering wartime aggressor
 Author(s): European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA)
 Topics: Antisemitism, Antisemitism: Monitoring, Hate crime, Law, Government, European Union, Main Topic: Antisemitism
 Abstract: Antisemitism can be expressed in the form of verbal and physical attacks, threats, harassment, property damage and graffiti or other forms of speech or text, including on the internet. Antisemitic incidents and hate crime violate fundamental rights, including the right to human dignity, the right to equality of treatment and the freedom of thought, conscience and religion.
 This annual overview compiles the available evidence on antisemitic incidents collected by governmental and non-governmental sources, covering the period 1 January 2006– 31 December 2016, where data are available. In addition, it includes a section that presents evidence from international organisations. No official data on reported antisemitic incidents in 2016 were available for 11 Member States by the time this report was compiled in September 2017.
 ‘Official data’ are understood here as those collected by law enforcement agencies, other authorities that are part of criminal justice systems and relevant state ministries at the national level. ‘Unofficial data’ refers to data collected by civil society organisations.
 Balti Jidiš Ja Selle Piirid
 Translated Title: Balti jiidiú ja taa piiriq / Baltic Yiddish and its borders
 Topics: Main Topic: Other, Yiddish, Linguistics, Language
 Ethnolect debate: evidence from Jewish Lithuanian
 Topics: Main Topic: Other, Linguistics, Language, Yiddish
 Abstract: This article presents the concept of Jewish Lithuanian as a range of post-Yiddish varieties spoken by some Jews in Lithuania and seeks to synthesise findings in contemporary ethnolect studies and in the field of Jewish language research. The legitimacy of the term ‘ethnolect’ is questioned by some researchers; however, it is argued that contemporary ethnolect research concentrates on postmodern urban immigrant communities in the west, which are very different from the situation of Jews in contemporary Eastern Europe. It is argued that language and identity matters are more complex than just ‘Jewish’, ‘Lithuanian’ or ‘assimilated Jew’. Jewish Lithuanian exhibits realisation of diphthongs and palatalised consonant different from that in mainstream Lithuanian. These features are traceable back to Yiddish. There is very little Yiddish impact on the lexical level; as for morphosyntax and pragmatics, more data are needed. The informants exhibit a high degree of linguistic awareness and their metalinguistic comments provide relevant information. Different from other post-Yiddish varieties, Jewish Lithuanian is not a transitional stage towards monolingualism: the speakers remain multilingual and code-switching between varieties of Lithuanian, Yiddish and Russian is a common phenomenon.
 Bare participle forms in the speech of Lithuanian Yiddish heritage speakers: multiple causation
 Topics: Main Topic: Other, Linguistics, Language, Yiddish, Interviews
 Abstract: The article is concerned with bare participle forms instead of full-fledged past tense (the auxiliary
 hobn/zajn + past participle) produced by two young male speakers of Lithuanian Yiddish. In Yiddish, the past tense is more or less isomorphic to the German Perfekt and covers the functions of both perfect and imperfect. The speakers acquired Yiddish and Lithuanian simultaneously in their childhood. Remarkably, in Lithuanian, present perfect auxiliary is optional. The phenomenon of omission can be explained within at least two paradigms: incomplete L1 acquisition (especially in heritage language speakers) and contact linguistics (contact-induced language change). In this article I argue that there are possible multiple explanations because it is unclear how to draw a strict line between incomplete acquisition and contact-induced language change. Compar-ison with Levine’s study on incomplete acquisition of Yiddish demonstrates that the present informants are fluent, strongly identify with Yiddish and produce no non-target past participles. At the same time, the speech of the informants exhib-its Lithuanian impact in phonetics and non-core morphosyntax. While limited input does play a role, it is unclear whether and where the border between incom-plete acquisition and contact-induced structural change can be drawn
 Overview of Immovable Property Restitution/Compensation Regime - Lithuania (As of 13 December 2016)
 Author(s): European Shoah Legacy Institute (ESLI)
 Topics: Holocaust Survivors, Main Topic: Holocaust and Memorial, Restitution and Reparations, Holocaust
 Abstract: The Holocaust (Shoah) Immovable Property Restitution Study is the first-ever comprehensive
 compilation of all significant legislation passed since 1945 by the 47 states that participated in
 the 2009 Prague Holocaust Era Assets Conference and endorsed the 2009 Terezin Declaration
 that came out of the Prague conference.
 The Terezin Declaration (and its companion document, the 2010 Guidelines and Best Practices,
 endorsed by 43 countries) focuses in substantial part on the treatment of immovable (real)
 property restitution: private, communal, and heirless property. The Study examined private,
 communal, and heirless property as discrete components of each country’s restitution efforts
 from 1944 to 2016.
 Lithuania endorsed the Terezin Declaration in 2009 and the Guidelines and Best Practices
 As part of the European Shoah Legacy Institute’s Immovable Property Restitution Study,
 a Questionnaire covering past and present restitution regimes for private, communal and
 heirless property was sent to all 47 Terezin Declaration governments in 2015. As of 13
 December 2016, no response from Lithuania has been received.
 Holocaust (Shoah) Immovable Property Restitution Study
 Topics: Holocaust Survivors, Main Topic: Holocaust and Memorial, Restitution and Reparations
 Everything speaks: the Jewish Lithuanian experience through people, places and objects
 Author(s): Woolfson, Shivaun
 Topics: Main Topic: Holocaust and Memorial, Holocaust Survivors, Oral History and Biography, Ethnography, Ageing and the Elderly, Memory, Artefacts and Material Culture
 Abstract: Once regarded as a vibrant centre of intellectual, cultural and spiritual Jewish life, Lithuania was home to 240,000 Jews prior to the Nazi invasion of 1941. By war's end, less than 20,000 remained. Today, 4,000 Jews reside there, among them 108 survivors from the camps and ghettos and a further 70 from the Partisans and Red Army. Against a backdrop of ongoing Holocaust denial and a recent surge in anti-Semitic sentiment, this thesis presents the history and experiences of a group of elderly survivors in modern-day Vilnius through the lens of their stories and memories, their special places and their biographical objects. Incorporating interdisciplinary elements of cultural anthropology, social geography, psychology, narrative and sensory ethnography, it is informed, at its core, by an overtly spiritual approach. Drawing on the essentially Hasidic belief that everything in the material world is imbued with sacred essence and that we, as human beings, have the capacity through our actions to release that essence, it explores the points of intersection where the individual and the collective collide, illuminating how history is lived from the inside. Glimpses of the personal, typically absent from the historical record, are afforded prominence here: a bottle of perfume tucked into a pocket before fleeing the ghetto, a silent promise made beside a mass grave, a pair of shoes fashioned from parachute material in the forest. By tapping the material for meaning, a more embodied, emplaced, experiential level of knowing, deeper and richer than that achieved through traditional life history (oral testimony and written documents) methods, can emerge. In moving beyond words and gathering a bricolage of story, legend, artefact, document, monument and landscape, this research suggests a multidimensional historiography that is of particular relevance in grasping the lived reality of survivors in Lithuania where only the faintest traces of a once thriving Jewish heritage now remain.
 Holocaust Legacy in Post-Soviet Lithuania People: Places and Objects
 Abstract: Once regarded as a vibrant centre of intellectual, cultural and spiritual Jewish life, Lithuania was home to 240,000 Jews prior to the Nazi invasion of 1941. By war's end, less than 20,000 remained. Today, approximately 4,000 Jews reside there, among them 108 survivors from the camps and ghettos and a further 70 from the Partisans and Red Army.
 Against a backdrop of ongoing Holocaust dismissal and a recent surge in anti-Semitic sentiment, Holocaust Legacy in Post-Soviet Lithuania presents the history and experiences of a group of elderly Holocaust survivors in modern-day Vilnius. Using their stories and memories, their places of significance as well as biographical objects, Shivaun Woolfson considers the complexities surrounding Holocaust memory and legacy in a post-Soviet era Lithuania. The book also incorporates interdisciplinary elements of anthropology, psychology and ethnography, and is informed at its heart by a spiritual approach that marks it out from other more conventional historical treatments of the subject.
 Holocaust Legacy in Post-Soviet Lithuania includes 20 images, comes with comprehensive online resources and weaves together story, artefact, monument and landscape to provide a multidimensional history of the Lithuanian Jewish experience during and after the Holocaust.
 Report on issues related to property restitution and compensation in former Communist countries
 Author(s): Naamat, Talia; Ilan, Ronna
 Topics: Law, European Union, Main Topic: Holocaust and Memorial
 Antisemitism in Post-Soviet Territory: A Concise Overview (2009-2010)
 Topics: Antisemitism, Antisemitism monitoring, Hate crime, Holocaust Denial, Main Topic: Antisemitism
 Евреи на постсоветском пространстве: новые демографические данные
 Translated Title: Post-Soviet Jewish Demographic Dynamics: An Analysis of Recent Data
 Topics: Demography, Aliyah, Russian Emigration, Main Topic: Demography and Migration
 Abstract: В статье на основе новых данных представлена динамика численности евреев в постсоветских странах, их столицах и отдельных частях Российской Федерации. Проанализированы некоторые основные демографические характеристики еврейского населения – его возрастная структура и уровень рождаемости. Рассмотрены перемены в направлениях современной миграции. При этом особое внимание уделено наиболее многочисленному потоку из России в Израиль, а также возвратной миграции в Россию.
 The New Jewish Diaspora: Russian-Speaking Immigrants in the United States, Israel, and Germany
 Editor(s): Gitelman, Zvi
 Topics: Russian Jews, Immigration, Aliyah, Diaspora, Main Topic: Demography and Migration
 Abstract: In 1900 over five million Jews lived in the Russian empire; today, there are four times as many Russian-speaking Jews residing outside the former Soviet Union than there are in that region. The New Jewish Diaspora is the first English-language study of the Russian-speaking Jewish diaspora. This migration has made deep marks on the social, cultural, and political terrain of many countries, in particular the United States, Israel, and Germany. The contributors examine the varied ways these immigrants have adapted to new environments, while identifying the common cultural bonds that continue to unite them.
 Assembling an international array of experts on the Soviet and post-Soviet Jewish diaspora, the book makes room for a wide range of scholarly approaches, allowing readers to appreciate the significance of this migration from many different angles. Some chapters offer data-driven analyses that seek to quantify the impact Russian-speaking Jewish populations are making in their adoptive countries and their adaptations there. Others take a more ethnographic approach, using interviews and observations to determine how these immigrants integrate their old traditions and affiliations into their new identities. Further chapters examine how, despite the oceans separating them, members of this diaspora form imagined communities within cyberspace and through literature, enabling them to keep their shared culture alive.
 Above all, the scholars in The New Jewish Diaspora place the migration of Russian-speaking Jews in its historical and social contexts, showing where it fits within the larger historic saga of the Jewish diaspora, exploring its dynamic engagement with the contemporary world, and pointing to future paths these immigrants and their descendants might follow.
 Introduction: Homelands, Diasporas, and the Islands in Between
 Part I Demography: Who Are the Migrants and Where Have They Gone?
 Chapter 1 Demography of the Contemporary Russian-Speaking Jewish Diaspora
 Mark Tolts
 Chapter 2 The Russian-Speaking Israeli Diaspora in the FSU, Europe, and North America: Jewish Identification and Attachment to Israel
 Chapter 3 Home in the Diaspora? Jewish Returnees and Transmigrants in Ukraine
 Marina Sapritsky
 Part II Transnationalism and Diasporas
 Chapter 4 Rethinking Boundaries in the Jewish Diaspora from the FSU
 Jonathan Dekel-Chen
 Chapter 5 Diaspora from the Inside Out: Litvaks in Lithuania Today
 Chapter 6 Russian-Speaking Jews and Israeli Emigrants in the United States: A Comparison of Migrant Populations
 Part III Political and Economic Change
 Chapter 7 Political Newborns: Immigrants in Israel and Germany
 Olena Bagno-Moldavski
 Chapter 8 The Move from Russia/the Soviet Union to Israel: A Transformation of Jewish Culture and Identity
 Chapter 9 The Economic Integration of Soviet Jewish Immigrants in Israel
 Part IV Resocialization and the Malleability of Ethnicity
 Chapter 10 Russian-Speaking Jews in Germany
 Chapter 11 Performing Jewishness and Questioning the Civic Subject among Russian-Jewish Migrants in Germany
 Chapter 12 Inventing a “New Jew”: The Transformation of Jewish Identity in Post-Soviet Russia
 Elena Nosenko-Shtein
 Part V Migration and Religious Change
 Chapter 13 Post-Soviet Immigrant Religiosity: Beyond the Israeli National Religion
 Nelly Elias and Julia Lerner
 Chapter 14 Virtual Village in a Real World: The Russian Jewish Diaspora Online
 Part VI Diaspora Russian Literature
 Chapter 15 Four Voices from the Last Soviet Generation: Evgeny Steiner, Alexander Goldstein, Oleg Yuryev, and Alexander Ilichevsky
 Chapter 16 Poets and Poetry in Today’s Diaspora: On Being “Marginally Jewish”
 Chapter 17 Triple Identities: Russian-Speaking Jews as German, American, and Israeli Writers
 Afterword: The Future of a Diaspora
 Еврейское население бывшего СССР в ХХ веке: (социально-демографический анализ).
 Translated Title: Jewish Population of the Former Soviet Union in 20th Century (Socio-Demographic Analysis)
 Topics: Demography, Main Topic: Demography and Migration
 Abstract: Настоящая книга представляет собой попытку обобщающего исследования
 социально-демографического развития еврейского населения бывшего СССР
 за истекшее столетие, включая динамику численности и расселения по
 республикам и городам, этноязыковой состав, половозрастную и семейную
 структуру, рождаемость и смертность, уровень образования,
 профессиональную структуру, участие в советской политической системе и
 эмиграцию в другие страны. В частности, рассматривается влияние
 Катастрофы, как на общую численность еврейского населения, так и на его
 социально-экономическую структуру. Большое внимание в книге уделяется
 представительству евреев среди студентов, специалистов и научных
 работников бывшего СССР.
 Книга предназначена для демографов, социологов, историков и всех
 интересующихся данной проблемой. Многие статистические материалы,
 представленные в книге, публикуются впервые.
 European Jewish Digest: February 2016
 Author(s): Goldstein, Richard
 Topics: Antisemitism, Jewish Heritage, Politics, Holocaust Memorials, Main Topic: Other
 Abstract: JPR’s monthly European Jewish digest provides a concise look at some of the major events impacting on Jewish life around Europe.
 Antisemitism: Overview of data available in the European Union 2004–2014
 Abstract: Antisemitism can be expressed in the form of verbal and physical attacks, threats, harassment, property damage, graffiti or other forms of text, including on the internet. This report relates to manifestations of antisemitism as they are recorded by official and unofficial sources in the 28 European Union (EU) Member States.
 ‘Official data’ is understood here as that collected by law enforcement agencies, criminal justice systems and relevant state ministries at the national level. ‘Unofficial data’ refers to data collected by civil society organisations.
 This report compiles available data on antisemitic incidents collected by international, governmental and non-governmental sources, covering the period 1 January 2004– 31 December 2014, where data are available. No official data on reported antisemitic incidents were available for seven Member States at the time this report was compiled: Bulgaria, Estonia, Hungary, Italy, Lithuania, Malta and Portugal.
 Third Survey of European Jewish Leaders and Opinion Formers, 2015
 Abstract: Launched by the American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee’s International Centre for Community Development (JDC-ICCD), and conducted by a research team at Trinity College (Hartford, Connecticut, USA) between June and August 2015, the Third Survey of European Jewish Leaders and Opinion Formers presents the results of an online survey administered to 314 respondents in 29 countries. The survey was conducted online in five languages: English, French, Spanish, German and Hungarian. The Survey of European Jewish Leaders and Opinion Formers is conducted every three or four years using the same format, in order to identify trends and their evolution. Findings of the 2015 edition were assessed and evaluated based on the results of previous surveys (2008 and 2011). The survey posed Jewish leaders and opinion formers a range of questions about major challenges and issues that
 concern European Jewish communities in 2015, and about their expectations of how communities will evolve over the next 5-10 years. The 45 questions (see Appendix) dealt
 with topics that relate to internal community structures and their functions, as well as the external environment affecting communities. The questionnaire also included six open-ended questions in a choice of five languages. These answers form the basis of the qualitative analysis of the report. The questions were organized under the following headings:• Vision & Change (6 questions)
 • Decision-Making & Control (1 question)
 • Lay Leadership (1 question)
 • Professional Leadership (2 questions)
 • Status Issues & Intermarriage (5 questions)
 • Organizational Frameworks (2 questions)
 • Community Causes (2 questions)
 • Jewish Education (1 question)
 • Funding (3 questions)
 • Communal Tensions (3 questions)
 • Anti-Semitism/Security (5 questions)
 • Europe (1 question)
 • Israel (1 question)
 • Future (2 questions)
 • Personal Profile (9 questions)
 Survey Results: General Assembly Budapest 2004
 Topics: Jewish Organisations, Jewish Community, Jewish Identity, Surveys, Jewish Leadership, Antisemitism, Affiliation and Belonging, Main Topic: Identity and Community
 Abstract: This survey was given to participants in the 3rd General Assembly of European Jewry, which was held in Budapest in May 2004. Participants were asked how many Jews participate in community programs in their respective cities; the programs and activities their Jewish community offers; and how they believe their community could be more effective in attracting more members.
 Second Survey of European Jewish Leaders and Opinion Formers, 2011
 Abstract: unquoted attribute value: "margin-left: 4
 European Jewish Digest: October 2015
 Topics: Antisemitism, Politics, Holocaust Commemoration, Main Topic: Other
 European Jewish Digest: September 2015
 European Jewish Digest: August 2015
 Reclaiming memory: Urban regeneration in the historic Jewish quarters of Central European cities
 Editor(s): Murzyn-Kupisz, Monika; Purchla, Jacek
 Topics: Jewish Heritage, Museums, Memory, Jewish Space, Post-1989, Restitution, Main Topic: Culture and Heritage
 Abstract: TABLE OF CONTENTS
 7 Jacek Purchla, "A world after a Catastrophe" - in search of lost memory
 Witnesses in the space of memory
 13 Miriam Akavia, A world before a Catastrophe. My Krakow family between the wars
 21 Leopold Unger, From the "last hope" to the "last exodus"
 29 Yevsei Handel, Minsk: non-revitalisation ofJewish districts and possible reasons
 43 Janusz Makuch, The Jewish Culture Festival: between two worlds
 Jewish heritage - dilemmas of regained memory
 53 Michal Firestone, The conservation ofJewish cultural heritage as a tool for the investigation of identity
 63 Ruth Ellen Gruber, Beyond virtually Jewish... balancing the real, the surreal and real imaginary places
 81 Sandra Lustig, Alternatives to "Jewish Disneyland." Some approaches to Jewish history in European cities and towns
 99 Magdalena Waligorska, Spotlight on the unseen: the rediscovery of little Jerusalems
 117 Agnieszka Sabor, In search of identity
 Jewish heritage in Central European metropolises
 123 Andreas Wilke, The Spandauer Vorstadt in Berlin.15 years of urban regeneration
 139 Martha Keil, A clash of times. Jewish sites in Vienna (Judenplatz, Seitenstettengasse, Tempelgasse)
 163 Krisztina Keresztely, Wasting memories -gentrification vs. urban values in the Jewish neighbourhood ofBudapest
 181 Arno Pah'k, The struggle to protect the monuments of Prague's Jewish Town
 215 Jaroslav Klenovsky, Jewish Brno
 247 Sarunas Lields, The revitalisation of Jewish heritage in Vilnius
 Approaches of Polish towns and cities to the problems of revitalising Jewish cultural heritage
 263 Bogustaw Szmygin, Can a world which has ceased to exist be protected? The Jewish district in Lublin
 287 Eleonora Bergman, The "Northern District" in Warsaw:a city within a city?
 301 Jacek Wesoiowski, The Jewish heritage in the urban space of todz - a question ofpresence
 325 Agnieszka Zabtocka-Kos, In search of new ideas. Wroclaw's "Jewish district" - yesterday and today
 343 Adam Bartosz, This was the Tarnow shtetl
 363 Monika Murzyn-Kupisz, Reclaiming memory or mass consumption? Dilemmas in rediscovering Jewish heritage ofKrakow's Kazimierz
 European Jewish Digest: June 2015
 Compass 09/10: Directions in European Jewish Life
 Topics: Fundraising and Philanthropy, Social Entrepeneurs, Jewish Organisations, Jewish Community, Jewish Heritage, Main Topic: Other
 Abstract: An initiative of the Westbury Group, a network of more than 20 international foundations with a shared interest in enhancing Jewish life in Europe, Compass reflects the breadth and depth of Jewish activity across the cultural, historical and religious spectrums of European Jewish life in 15 countries.
 This directory – the first of its kind to focus on European Jewry, including the FSU – will introduce, enlighten and inform its readers about some of the exciting Jewish projects taking place in cities and towns all over Europe. The 36 organisations and programmes featured in this first edition of Compass reflect the breadth and depth of communities that are innovative, creative, effective and most importantly, sustainable.
 European Jewish Digest: May 2015
 European Jewish Digest: April 2015
 Jewish Studies in Lithuania Since 1990
 Author(s): Liekis, Šarūnas
 Topics: Jewish Studies, Bibliography and Literature Reviews, Main Topic: Other, Universities / Higher Education
 Editor(s): Rebhun, Uzi
 Topics: Demography, Bibliography, Main Topic: Demography and Migration, Censuses, Aliyah, Migration, Soviet Jewry
 Abstract: The article shows that demographic study of the Jews in the Former Soviet Union has a long and well established tradition based on the very rich amount of data: i.e., vital and migration statistics, and census results. The analysis started from an overview of the Tsarist and Soviet statistical legacies. However, most of the attention is focused on findings of the last quarter century. The study examines both the role of the Soviet internal passport which, because it listed ethnicity, was the basis for Jewish statistics, and the consequences of the elimination of compulsory ethnic identification in the post-Soviet Slavic countries.
 A Brief Survey of Present-Day Karaite Communities in Europe
 Author(s): Trevisan Semi, Emanuela
 Topics: Karaites, Main Topic: Identity and Community
 Lithuanian Jewry 1993: A Demographic and Sociocultural Profile
 Author(s): Goldstein, Alice


type: caselaw

jurisdiction: EU

text:
16.6.2012
 IT
 Gazzetta ufficiale dell'Unione europea
 C 174/23
 Ordinanza del Tribunale del 16 aprile 2012 — F91 Diddeléng e a./Commissione
 (Causa T-341/10) (1)
 (Ricorso di annullamento - Archiviazione di una denuncia - Mancato avvio di un procedimento di inadempimento - Mancanza di un atto impugnabile - Irricevibilità)
 2012/C 174/38
 Lingua processuale: il francese
 Parti
 Ricorrenti: F91 Diddeléng (Dudelange, Lussemburgo); Julien Bonnetaud (Yutz, Francia); Thomas Gruszczynski (Amnéville, Francia); Rainer Hauck (Maxdorf, Germania); Stéphane Martine (Esch-sur-Alzette, Lussemburgo); Grégory Molnar (Moyeuvre-Grande, Francia), e Yann Thibout (Algrange, Francia) (rappresentanti: avv.ti L. Misson, C. Delrée e G. Ernes)
 Convenuta: Commissione europea (rappresentanti: G. Rozet e P. Van Nuffel, agenti)
 Interveniente a sostegno della convenuta: Fédération Luxembourgeoise de Football (FLF) (Mondercange, Lussemburgo) (rappresentanti: inizialmente K. Daly, solicitor, e D. Keane, SC, poi K. Daly)
 Oggetto
 Domanda di annullamento della decisione della Commissione del 3 giugno 2010 di archiviare senza darle seguito la denuncia presentata dai ricorrenti contro la Fédération luxembourgeoise de football (FLF); domanda di annullamento dei regolamenti della FLF che violano gli articoli 39 CE e 81 CE nonché domanda di infliggere «qualsiasi sanzione adeguata»
 Dispositivo
 1)
 Il ricorso è respinto in quanto irricevibile.
 2)
 La F91 Diddeléng, Julien Bonnetaud, Thomas Gruszczynski, Rainer Hauck, Stéphane Martine, Grégory Molnar e Yann Thibout sopportano le proprie spese nonché quelle sostenute dalla Commissione europea.
 3)
 La Fédération luxembourgeoise de football (FLF) sopporta le proprie spese.
 (1) GU C 301 del 6.11.2010.


text:
23.10.2004
 DA
 Den Europæiske Unions Tidende
 C 262/1
 DOMSTOLENS DOM
 (Anden Afdeling)
 af 9. september 2004
 i sag C-304/01, Kongeriget Spanien mod Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber (1)
 (Fælles fiskeripolitik - forordning (EF) nr. 1162/2001 - genopbygning af kulmulebestanden - kontrol af fiskerfartøjers aktiviteter - valg af retsgrundlag - princippet om forbud mod forskelsbehandling - begrundelsespligt)
 (2004/C 262/01)
 Processprog: spansk
 I sag C-304/01, Kongeriget Spanien (befuldmægtiget: N. Díaz Abad) mod Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber (befuldmægtigede: T. van Rijn og S. Pardo Quintillán), har Domstolen (Anden Afdeling), sammensat af afdelingsformanden, C.W.A. Timmermans (refererende dommer), og dommerne C. Gulmann, J.-P. Puissochet, J.N. Cunha Rodrigues og N. Colneric, generaladvokat: J. Kokott, justitssekretær: ekspeditionssekretær Múgica Arzamendi, den 9. september 2004 afsagt dom, hvis konklusion lyder således:
 1)
 Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber frifindes.
 2)
 Kongeriget Spanien betaler sagens omkostninger.
 (1) EFT C 289 af 13.10.2001.


text:
 15.8.2009
 LV
 Eiropas Savienības Oficiālais Vēstnesis
 C 193/20
 Pirmās instances tiesas 2009. gada 30. jūnija spriedums — CPEM/Komisija
 (Lieta T-444/07) (1)
 (ESF - Finanšu atbalsta atcelšana - OLAF ziņojums)
 2009/C 193/30
 Tiesvedības valoda — franču
 Lietas dalībnieki
 Prasītājs: Centre de promotion de l'emploi par la micro-entreprise [Centrs nodarbinātības veicināšanai mazos uzņēmumos] (CPEM), Marseļa (Francija) (pārstāvis — S. Bonefua [C. Bonnefoi], advokāts)
 Atbildētāja: Eiropas Kopienu Komisija (pārstāvji — L. Flins [L. Flynn] un A. Steiblīte [A. Steiblytė])
 Priekšmets
 Prasība atcelt Komisijas 2007. gada 4. oktobra Lēmumu C (2007) 4645, ar ko izbeigts Eiropas Sociālā fonda (ESF) atbalsts, kas piešķirts ar Komisijas 1999. gada 17. augusta Lēmumu C (1999) 2645, kā arī prasība atlīdzināt zaudējumus
 Rezolutīvā daļa:
 1)
 prasību noraidīt;
 2)
 Centre de promotion de l'emploi par la micro-entreprise (CPEM) atlīdzina tiesāšanās izdevumus, tostarp par pagaidu noregulējuma tiesvedību.
 (1) OV C 37, 9.2.2008.


type: contracts

text:
 18/Volumul 03
 RO
 Jurnalul Ofícial al Uniunii Europene
 74
 22004A1130(04)
 L 354/90
 JURNALUL OFÍCIAL AL UNIUNII EUROPENE
 ACORD
 între Uniunea Europeană și Republica Turcia privind participarea Republicii Turcia la Misiunea de Poliție a Uniunii Europene în Fosta Republică Iugoslavă a Macedoniei (EUPOL „Proxima”)
 UNIUNEA EUROPEANĂ,
 pe de o parte, și
 REPUBLICA TURCIA,
 pe de altă parte,
 ambele denumite în continuare „părți participante”,
 —
 adoptarea de către Consiliul Uniunii Europene, la 29 septembrie 2003, a Acțiunii comune 2003/681/PESC privind Misiunea de Poliție a Uniunii Europene în Fosta Republică Iugoslavă a Macedoniei (EUPOL „Proxima”) (1), care prevede că statele aderente sunt invitate, iar alte state terțe pot fi invitate să contribuie la EUPOL „Proxima”;
 —
 invitația adresată Republicii Turcia de a participa la EUPOL „Proxima”;
 —
 îndeplinirea cu succes a procesului de generare a forțelor și recomandarea șefului Misiunii de Poliție și a Comitetului pentru aspectele civile ale gestionării crizelor de a autoriza participarea Republicii Turcia la EUPOL „Proxima”;
 —
 decizia Comitetului Politic și de Securitate din 10 februarie 2004 de acceptare a contribuției Republicii Turcia la EUPOL „Proxima”;
 —
 acordul încheiat la 11 decembrie 2003 între Uniunea Europeană și Fosta Republică Iugoslavă a Macedoniei privind statutul și activitățile EUPOL „Proxima” în Fosta Republică Iugoslavă a Macedoniei (2), inclusiv dispozițiile privind statutul personalului EUPOL „Proxima”,
 CONVIN DUPĂ CUM URMEAZĂ:
 Articolul 1
 Cadrul general
 (1) Republica Turcia se asociază dispozițiilor Acțiunii comune 2003/681/PESC privind EUPOL „Proxima”, adoptate de Consiliul Uniunii Europene la 29 septembrie 2003, precum și oricărei alte acțiuni comune sau decizii prin care Consiliul Uniunii Europene ar putea hotărî extinderea EUPOL „Proxima”.
 (2) Contribuția Republicii Turcia la EUPOL „Proxima” nu aduce atingere autonomiei decizionale a Uniunii Europene.
 Articolul 2
 Statutul personalului
 (1) Statutul personalului detașat de Republica Turcia la EUPOL „Proxima” este reglementat de acordul încheiat la 11 decembrie 2003 între Uniunea Europeană și Fosta Republică Iugoslavă a Macedoniei privind statutul și activitățile EUPOL „Proxima” în Fosta Republică Iugoslavă a Macedoniei.
 (2) Fără a aduce atingere acordului între Uniunea Europeană și Fosta Republică Iugoslavă a Macedoniei privind statutul și activitățile EUPOL „Proxima” în Fosta Republică Iugoslavă a Macedoniei, Republica Turcia își exercită jurisdicția asupra personalului său care participă la EUPOL „Proxima”.
 (3) Republica Turcia răspunde pentru toate pretențiile legate de participarea la EUPOL „Proxima”, formulate de un membru al personalului său sau împotriva unui membru al personalului său. Republica Turcia răspunde de formularea oricărei acțiuni, în special în justiție sau disciplinare, împotriva oricărui membru al personalului său.
 —
 au fost cauzate de către personalul EUPOL „Proxima” în cursul îndeplinirii îndatoririlor legate de operațiune, cu excepția cazurilor de neglijență sau a faptelor ilicite săvârșite cu intenție;
 —
 sau au izvorât din utilizarea oricăruia din bunurile deținute de statele participante la EUPOL „Proxima”, cu condiția ca respectivele bunuri să fie folosite în legătură cu operațiunea și cu excepția cazurilor de neglijență sau a faptelor ilicite săvârșite cu intenție de un membru al personalului EUPOL „Proxima” care utilizează respectivele bunuri.
 (5) Statele membre ale Uniunii Europene se angajează să facă o declarație cu privire la renunțarea la pretenții în vederea participării Republicii Turcia la EUPOL „Proxima”.
 Articolul 3
 Informațiile clasificate
 (1) Republica Turcia adoptă măsurile necesare pentru asigurarea protecției informațiilor clasificate ale Uniunii Europene în conformitate cu regulamentul de securitate al Consiliului Uniunii Europene, prevăzut de Decizia 2001/264/CE a Consiliului din 19 martie 2001 (3), precum și cu celelalte instrucțiuni formulate de autoritățile competente, inclusiv de șeful misiunii/comisar de poliție al EUPOL „Proxima”.
 (2) În cazul în care Uniunea Europeană și Republica Turcia încheie un acord privind procedurile de securitate cu privire la schimbul de informații clasificate, dispozițiile unui astfel de acord se aplică în contextul EUPOL „Proxima”.
 Articolul 4
 Personalul detașat la EUPOL „Proxima”
 —
 dispozițiile Acțiunii comune 2003/681/PESC și cu modificările ulterioare menționate la articolul 1 alineatul (1) din prezentul acord;
 —
 planul operațiunii;
 —
 măsurile de punere în aplicare.
 (2) Republica Turcia informează în timp util șeful misiunii/comisar de poliție EUPOL „Proxima” și Secretariatul General al Consiliului Uniunii Europene cu privire la orice schimbare în ceea ce privește contribuția sa la EUPOL „Proxima”.
 (3) Personalul detașat la EUPOL „Proxima” este supus unui examen medical, este vaccinat și primește un certificat medical care să ateste faptul că este apt pentru serviciu, emis de o autoritate competentă din Republica Turcia. Personalul detașat la EUPOL „Proxima” prezintă o copie a acestui certificat.
 (4) Ofițerii de poliție detașați își desfășoară activitatea în uniformele lor naționale de poliție. Beretele și insignele sunt asigurate de EUPOL „Proxima”.
 Articolul 5
 Ierarhia de comandă
 (1) Personalul detașat de Republica Turcia își îndeplinește sarcinile și se comportă exclusiv în interesul EUPOL „Proxima”.
 (2) Personalul rămâne în întregime sub comanda deplină a autorităților naționale.
 (3) Autoritățile naționale transferă controlul operațional (OPCON) șefului misiunii/comisar de poliție EUPOL „Proxima”, care exercită comanda printr-o structură ierarhică de comandă și control.
 (4) Șeful misiunii/comisar de poliție conduce EUPOL „Proxima” și își asumă gestionarea curentă a acesteia.
 (5) Republica Turcia are aceleași drepturi și obligații în ceea ce privește gestionarea curentă a operațiunii ca și statele membre ale Uniunii Europene care iau parte la operațiune, în conformitate cu articolul 9 alineatul (4) din Acțiunea comună 2003/681/PESC.
 (6) Șeful misiunii/comisar de poliție al EUPOL „Proxima” răspunde de controlul disciplinar asupra personalului operativ. După caz, autoritățile naționale în cauză iau măsuri disciplinare.
 (7) Republica Turcia desemnează un punct de contact al contingentului național (NPC), care să reprezinte contingentul său național în misiune. NPC raportează șefului misiunii/comisar de poliție al EUPOL „Proxima” cu privire la aspecte de ordin național și este răspunzător de disciplina zilnică a contingentului.
 (8) Decizia Uniunii Europene de a încheia operațiunea este luată după consultarea Republicii Turcia, cu condiția ca acest stat să mai contribuie încă la EUPOL „Proxima” la data încheierii operațiunii.
 Articolul 6
 Aspecte financiare
 (1) Republica Turcia își asumă toate costurile legate de participarea sa la operațiune, cu excepția acelor costuri care fac obiectul finanțării comune a Uniunii Europene, astfel cum sunt prevăzute în bugetul de funcționare al operațiunii.
 (2) Republica Turcia ia în considerare posibilitatea unor contribuții cu caracter voluntar.
 inter alia
 (a)
 suma în cauză;
 (b)
 modalitățile de plată a contribuțiilor financiare;
 (c)
 procedura de audit.
 (4) În cazul morții, vătămării corporale, deteriorării sau distrugerii provocate persoanelor fizice sau juridice din Fosta Republică Iugoslavă a Macedoniei, Republica Turcia plătește, în cazul stabilirii răspunderii sale, despăgubiri în conformitate cu condițiile prevăzute de acordul privind statutul misiunii menționat la articolul 2 alineatul (1) din acord.
 Articolul 7
 Nerespectarea obligațiilor
 În cazul în care una dintre părți nu respectă obligațiile prevăzute la articolele de mai sus, cealaltă parte are dreptul să denunțe prezentul acord prin comunicarea unei notificări cu o lună înainte.
 Articolul 8
 Soluționarea diferendelor
 Diferendele privind interpretarea sau aplicarea prezentului acord se soluționează între părți pe cale diplomatică.
 Articolul 9
 Intrare în vigoare
 (1) Prezentul acord intră în vigoare în prima zi a primei luni de la data la care părțile și-au notificat reciproc încheierea procedurilor interne necesare în acest sens.
 (2) Prezentul acord se aplică cu titlu provizoriu de la data semnării.
 (3) Prezentul acord poate fi modificat pe baza acordului comun în scris al părților. (4) Prezentul acord poate fi denunțat de una dintre părți prin notificare scrisă de denunțare adresată celeilalte părți. Denunțarea intră în vigoare la șase luni de la primirea notificării de către cealaltă parte.
 Încheiat la Bruxelles, la 10 septembrie 2004, în limba engleză în patru exemplare.
 Pentru Uniunea Europeană
 Pentru Republica Turcia
 (1) JO L 249, 1.10.2003, p. 66.
 (2) JO L 16, 23.1.2004, p. 65.
 (3) JO L 101, 11.4.2001, p. 1.


text:
 15.3.2012
 CS
 Úřední věstník Evropské unie
 L 76/56
 ROZHODNUTÍ SMÍŠENÉHO VÝBORU EHP
 č. 164/2011
 ze dne 19. prosince 2011,
 kterým se mění příloha XIII (Doprava) Dohody o EHP
 SMÍŠENÝ VÝBOR EHP,
 s ohledem na Dohodu o Evropském hospodářském prostoru, ve znění Protokolu o úpravě Dohody o Evropském hospodářském prostoru (dále jen „Dohoda“), a zejména na článek 98 této dohody,
 vzhledem k těmto důvodům:
 (1)
 Příloha XIII Dohody byla změněna rozhodnutím Smíšeného výboru EHP č. 152/2011 ze dne 2. prosince 2011 (1).
 (2)
 Nařízení Komise (ES) č. 690/2009 ze dne 30. července 2009, kterým se mění nařízení Evropského parlamentu a Rady (ES) č. 216/2008 o společných pravidlech v oblasti civilního letectví a o zřízení Evropské agentury pro bezpečnost letectví, kterým se ruší směrnice Rady 91/670/EHS, nařízení (ES) č. 1592/2002 a směrnice 2004/36/ES (2), by mělo být začleněno do Dohody,
 PŘIJAL TOTO ROZHODNUTÍ:
 Článek 1
 V bodě 66n (nařízení Evropského parlamentu a Rady (ES) č. 216/2008) přílohy XIII Dohody se doplňují tato slova:
 „ , ve znění:
 —
 32009 R 0690: nařízení Komise (ES) č. 690/2009 ze dne 30. července 2009 (Úř. věst. L 199, 31.7.2009, s. 6).“
 Článek 2
 Znění nařízení (ES) č. 690/2009 v islandském a norském jazyce, která mají být zveřejněna v dodatku EHP Úředního věstníku Evropské unie, jsou platná.
 Článek 3
 Toto rozhodnutí vstupuje v platnost dnem 20. prosince 2011 za předpokladu, že Smíšenému výboru EHP jsou učiněna veškerá oznámení podle čl. 103 odst. 1 Dohody (3), nebo v den vstupu v platnost rozhodnutí Smíšeného výboru EHP č. 163/2011 ze dne 19. prosince 2011 (4), podle toho, které datum je pozdější.
 Článek 4
 Toto rozhodnutí bude zveřejněno v oddíle EHP a v dodatku EHP Úředního věstníku Evropské unie.
 V Bruselu dne 19. prosince 2011.
 Za Smíšený výbor EHP
 předseda
 Kurt JÄGER
 (1) Viz strana 36 v tomto čísle Úředního věstníku.
 (2) Úř. věst. L 199, 31.7.2009, s. 6.
 (3) Nebyly oznámeny žádné ústavní požadavky.
 (4) Viz strana 51 v tomto čísle Úředního věstníku.


text:
 Fógra dlíthiúil tábhachtach
 |
 12006E/PRO/20
 Chonartha ag bunú an Chomhphobail Eorpaigh (Leagan comhdhlúite) - D. Prótacail atá i gceangal leis an gConradh ag bunú an Chomhphobail Eorpaigh - Prótacal (Uimh. 20) maidir leis an nós imeachta um easnamh iomarcach (1992)
 Official Journal C 321 E , 29/12/2006 P. 0293 - 0294
 Prótacal (Uimh. 20)maidir leis an nós imeachta um easnamh iomarcach (1992)TÁ NA hARDPHÁIRTITHE CONARTHACHA,ÓS MIAN LEO sonraí an nós imeachta um easnamh iomarcach dá dtagraítear in Airteagal 104 den Chonradh ag bunú an Chomhphobail Eorpaigh a chinneadh,TAR ÉIS COMHAONTÚ ar na forálacha seo a leanas a chuirfear i gceangal leis an gConradh ag bunú an Chomhphobail Eorpaigh.Airteagal 1Is iad na luachanna tagartha dá dtagraítear in Airteagal 104(2) den Chonradh seo:- 3 % don chóimheas idir an t-easnamh rialtais, pleanáilte nó iarbhír, agus an olltáirgeacht intíre ag praghsanna margaidh;- 60 % don chóimheas idir an fiachas rialtais agus an olltáirgeacht intíre ag praghsanna margaidh.Airteagal 2In Airteagal 104 den Chonradh seo agus sa Phrótacal seo:- ciallaíonn "Rialtas" Rialtas Ginearálta, is é sin, Rialtas Láir, rialtas réigiúnach nó áitiúil agus cistí slándála sóisialta, seachas oibríochtaí tráchtála mar atá siad sainithe i gCóras Eorpach na gCuntas Eacnamaíoch Suimeáilte;- ciallaíonn "easnamh" an ghlanfháil ar iasacht mar atá sí sainithe i gCóras Eorpach na gCuntas Eacnamaíoch Suimeáilte;- ciallaíonn "infheistíocht" ollfhoirmiú caipitil sheasta mar atá sé sainithe i gCóras Eorpach na gCuntas Eacnamaíoch Suimeáilte;- ciallaíonn "fiachas" ollfhiachas iomlán ar luach ainmniúil atá amuigh ag deireadh na bliana agus arna chomhdhlúthú idir earnálacha rialtais ghinearálta agus laistigh díobh mar atá sé sainithe sa chéad fhleasc.Airteagal 3Chun éifeachtúlacht an nós imeachta um easnamh iomarcach a áirithiú, beidh Rialtais na mBallstát freagrach faoin nós imeachta sin as easnaimh Rialtais Ghinearálta mar atá sé sainithe sa chéad fhleasc d'Airteagal 2. Áiritheoidh na Ballstáit go gcumasóidh nósanna imeachta náisiúnta sa réimse buiséadach dóibh a n-oibleagáidí sa réimse sin a chineann ón gConradh seo a chomhlíonadh. Déanfaidh na Ballstáit tuarascáil don Choimisiún go pras, tráthrialta ar a n-easnaimh phleanáilte agus iarbhír agus ar leibhéil a bhfiachais.Airteagal 4Soláthróidh an Coimisiún na sonraí staidrimh a úsáidfear chun an Prótacal seo a chur chun feidhme.--------------------------------------------------


text:
 23.2.2006
 FI
 Euroopan unionin virallinen lehti
 L 53/25
 ETA:N SEKAKOMITEAN PÄÄTÖS
 N:o 137/2005,
 tehty 2 päivänä joulukuuta 2005,
 ETA-sopimuksen liitteen I (Eläinlääkintä- ja kasvinsuojeluasiat) muuttamisesta
 ETA:N SEKAKOMITEA, joka
 ottaa huomioon Euroopan talousalueesta tehdyn sopimuksen, sellaisena kuin se on muutettuna Euroopan talousalueesta tehdyn sopimuksen tarkistamisesta tehdyllä pöytäkirjalla, jäljempänä ’sopimus’, ja erityisesti sen 98 artiklan,
 sekä katsoo seuraavaa:
 (1)
 Sopimuksen liite I muutettiin ETA:n sekakomitean päätöksellä N:o 93/2005 (1).
 (2)
 Kolmansista maista tulevien eläinten ja eläintuotteiden eläinlääkärintarkastuksia varten hyväksyttyjen rajatarkastusasemien luettelosta ja komission asiantuntijoiden tekemiä tarkastuksia koskevien yksityiskohtaisten sääntöjen saattamisesta ajan tasalle tehdyn päätöksen 2001/881/EY muuttamisesta 3 päivänä tammikuuta 2005 tehty komission päätös 2005/13/EY (2) olisi otettava osaksi sopimusta.
 (3)
 Kalojen virusperäisen verenvuotoseptikemian (VHS) ja tarttuvan verta muodostavan kudoksen kuolion (IHN) osalta hyväksytyn vyöhykkeen aseman ja ei-hyväksytyillä vyöhykkeillä sijaitsevan näiden tautien osalta hyväksytyn tilan aseman saamista varten toteutettavien ohjelmien kelpuuttamisesta tehdyn päätöksen 2003/634/EY liitteiden I ja II muuttamisesta 28 päivänä tammikuuta 2005 tehty komission päätös 2005/67/EY (3) olisi otettava osaksi sopimusta.
 (4)
 Päätösten 2001/881/EY ja 2002/459/EY muuttamisesta rajatarkastusasemien luettelon osalta 26 päivänä tammikuuta 2005 tehty komission päätös 2005/102/EY (4) olisi otettava osaksi sopimusta.
 (5)
 Bonamioosi-nilviäistaudin (Bonamia ostreae) ja/tai marteilioosi-nilviäistaudin (Marteilia refringens) osalta hyväksyttyjen alueiden luettelosta tehdyn päätöksen 2002/300/EY muuttamisesta 3 päivänä helmikuuta 2005 tehty komission päätös 2005/104/EY (5) olisi otettava osaksi sopimusta.
 (6)
 Tarttuvan vertamuodostavan kudoksen kuolion (IHN) ja/tai virusperäisen verenvuotoseptikemian (VHS) osalta hyväksyttyjen vyöhykkeiden ja kalanviljelylaitosten luetteloista tehdyn päätöksen 2002/308/EY liitteiden I ja II muuttamisesta 2 päivänä helmikuuta 2005 tehty komission päätös 2005/107/EY (6) olisi otettava osaksi sopimusta.
 (7)
 TRACES-järjestelmän käyttöönotosta ja päätöksen 92/486/ETY muuttamisesta tehdyn päätöksen 2004/292/EY muuttamisesta 9 päivänä helmikuuta 2005 tehty komission päätös 2005/123/EY (7) olisi otettava osaksi sopimusta.
 (8)
 Tätä päätöstä ei sovelleta Liechtensteiniin,
 ON PÄÄTTÄNYT SEURAAVAA:
 1 artikla
 Muutetaan sopimuksen liitteessä I oleva I luku tämän päätöksen liitteessä esitetyn mukaisesti.
 2 artikla
 Päätösten 2005/13/EY, 2005/67/EY, 2005/102/EY, 2005/104/EY, 2005/107/EY ja 2005/123/EY islanniksi ja norjaksi laaditut tekstit, jotka julkaistaan Euroopan unionin virallisen lehden ETA-täydennysosassa, ovat todistusvoimaisia.
 3 artikla
 Tämä päätös tulee voimaan 3 päivänä joulukuuta 2005, jos kaikki sopimuksen 103 artiklan 1 kohdan mukaiset ilmoitukset on tehty ETA:n sekakomitealle. (8)
 4 artikla
 Tämä päätös julkaistaan Euroopan unionin virallisen lehden ETA-osastossa ja ETA-täydennysosassa.
 Tehty Brysselissä 2 päivänä joulukuuta 2005.
 ETA:n sekakomitean puolesta
 Puheenjohtaja
 S.D. Prinz Nikolaus von LIECHTENSTEIN
 (1) EUVL L 306, 24.11.2005, s. 14.
 (2) EUVL L 6, 8.1.2005, s. 8.
 (3) EUVL L 27, 29.1.2005, s. 55.
 (4) EUVL L 33, 5.2.2005, s. 30.
 (5) EUVL L 33, 5.2.2005, s. 71.
 (6) EUVL L 34, 8.2.2005, s. 21.
 (7) EUVL L 39, 11.2.2005, s. 53.
 (8) Valtiosäännön asettamista vaatimuksista ei ole ilmoitettu.
 LIITE
 Muutetaan sopimuksen liitteessä I oleva I luku seuraavasti:
 1)
 Lisätään 1.2 osan 12 kohtaan (komission päätös 92/486/ETY) luetelmakohta seuraavasti:
 ”—
 32005 D 0123: komission päätös 2005/123/EY (EUVL L 39, 11.2.2005, s. 53).”.
 2)
 Lisätään 1.2 osan 39 kohtaan (komission päätös 2001/881/EY) luetelmakohta seuraavasti:
 ”—
 32005 D 0013: komission päätös 2005/13/EY (EUVL L 6, 8.1.2005, s. 8).”.
 3)
 Lisätään 1.2 osan 39 kohtaan (komission päätös 2001/881/EY) ja 46 kohtaan (komission päätös 2002/459/EY) luetelmakohta seuraavasti:
 ”—
 32005 D 0102: komission päätös 2005/102/EY (EUVL L 33, 5.2.2005, s. 30).”.
 4)
 Lisätään 1.2 osan 118 kohtaan (komission päätös 2004/292/EY) seuraava:
 ”, sellaisena kuin se on muutettuna seuraavalla:
 —
 32005 D 0123: komission päätös 2005/123/EY (EUVL L 39, 11.2.2005, s. 53).”.
 5)
 Lisätään 4.2 osan 65 kohtaan (komission päätös 2002/300/EY) luetelmakohta seuraavasti:
 ”—
 32005 D 0104: komission päätös 2005/104/EY (EUVL L 33, 5.2.2005, s. 71).”.
 6)
 Lisätään 4.2 osan 66 kohtaan (komission päätös 2002/308/EY) luetelmakohta seuraavasti:
 ”—
 32005 D 0107: komission päätös 2005/107/EY (EUVL L 34, 8.2.2005, s. 21).”.
 7)
 Lisätään 4.2 osan otsikon ”SÄÄDÖKSET, JOTKA EFTA-VALTIOIDEN JA EFTAN VALVONTAVIRANOMAISEN ON OTETTAVA AIHEELLISELLA TAVALLA HUOMIOON” alla olevaan 55 kohtaan (komission päätös 2003/634/EY) luetelmakohta seuraavasti:
 ”—
 32005 D 0067: komission päätös 2005/67/EY (EUVL L 27, 29.1.2005, s. 55).”.