text:
 Avis juridique important
 |
 52004PC0465
 Proposta għal regolament tal-Kunsill li jistabbilixxi strument ta' appoġġ finanzjarju li jinkoraġġixxi l-iżvilupp ekonomiku tal-komunità Turko-Ċiprijotta /* KUMM/2004/0465 finali - CNS 2004/0145 */
 Proposta għal REGOLAMENT TAL-KUNSILL li jistabbilixxi strument ta' appoġġ finanzjarju li jinkoraġġixxi l-iżvilupp ekonomiku tal-komunità Turko-Ċiprijotta(presented by the Commission)MEMORANDUM TA' SPJEGAZZJONIIl-Kunsill Ewropew enfasizza repetutament ix-xewqa tiegħu għad-dħul fl-Unjoni Ewropea ta' Ċipru magħqud mill-ġdid. S'issa, soluzzjoni komprensiva għadha ma ntlaħqitx."Is-Soluzzjoni Komprensiva tal-Problema ta' Ċipru", kif iffinalizzata mis-Segretarju Ġenerali tan-NU Kofi Annan, ġiet approvata mill-elettorat Turko-Ċiprijott f'referenda separati, iżda li seħħew fl-istess ħin fl-24 ta' April 2004. Wara r-riżultat tar-referenda, il-Kunsill qal fis-26 t' April 2004:"Il-komunità Turko-Ċiprijotta esprimiet ix-xewqa ċara tagħħa li jkollha futur fi ħdan l-Unjoni Ewropea. Il-Kunsill huwa ddeterminat li jtemm l-iżolament tal-komunità Turko-Ċiprijotta, u li jħaffef ir-rijunifikazzjoni ta' Ċipru billi jinkoraġġixxi l-iżvilupp ekonomiku tal-komunità Turko-Ċiprijotta. Il-Kunsill stieden il-Kummissjoni biex jagħmel proposti konkreti f'dan ir-rigward, b'enfasi partikolari fuq l-integrazzjoni ekonomika tal-gżira u fuq it-titjib fil-kuntatt bejn iż-żewġ komunitajiet u ma' l-UE. Il-Kunsill irrakkomanda li l-259 miljun ewro li diġa ġew allokati għan-naħa tat-tramuntana ta' Ċipru fl-eventwalità ta' soluzzjoni issa għandhom jiġu użati għal dan il-għan.It-tifsila ta' l-abbozz mehmuż għar-Regolament tal-Kunsill tilqa' l-istedina tal-Kunsill u tistabbilixxi strument għall-għajnuna ekonomika biex jittejjeb l-iżvilupp ekonomiku tal-komunità Turko-Ċiprijotta. Jekk wieħed jikkunsidra l-qagħda politika, u bl-iskop li tiġi allokata għajnuna finanzjarja bl-iktar mod effiċjenti u mgħaġġel l-abbozz jipprovdi li l-għajnuna tiġi mogħtija direttament lill-benefiċċjarji.Ir-rendikont finanzjarju leġislattiv għal dan ir-Regolament ser jippreżenta l-ammont ta' EUR 6 miljun għas-sena 2004, iddestinati primarjament għal studji ta' fattibilità għall-implimentazzjoni ta' l-għajnuna finanzjarja matul is-snin 2005 (EUR114 miljun) u 2006 (EUR139 miljun). Parti minn din l-għajnuna ser tiġi użata biex tiġi ffinanzjata n-nefqa ta' appoġġ li hija marbuta ma' l-implimentazzjoni.Il-pakkett preżenti qed jimmira li jħaffef ir-rijunifikazzjoni ta' Ċipru billi jinkoraġġixxi żviluppi ekonomiċi u soċjali b'enfasi partikolari fuq l-integrazzjoni ekonomika tal-gżira, permezz ta' allinjament ma' l-acquis, u billi jtejjeb il-kuntatt bejn iż-żewġ komunitajiet u l-UE. Minbarra ir-rikonċiljazzjoni u l-miżuri biex tikber il-fiduċja, ser tkopri, inter alia, il-promozzjoni ta' żvilupp soċjali u ekonomiku, żvilupp ta' l-infrastruttura u kuntatti bejn in-nies. Il-biċċa l-kbira ta' l-attivitajiet ser ikunu għalhekk simili għal attivitajiet ta' qabel is-sħubija. Minħabba l-iżolament tal-komunità Turko-Ċiprijotta matul dawn l-aħħar snin, l-attivitajiet ser jiffukaw ħafna fuq l-għajnuna biex jiġu qrib ta' l-acquis, speċjalment f'dak li jirrigwarda investiment biex ikunu sodisfatti normi Ewropej, inter alia, fl-oqsma ta' l-ambjent u tat-trasport.2004/045 (CNS)Proposta għal REGOLAMENT TAL-KUNSILL li jistabbilixxi strument ta' appoġġ finanzjarju li jinkoraġġixxi l-iżvilupp ekonomiku tal-komunità Turko-Ċiprijotta.IL-KUNSILL TA' L-UNJONI EWROPEA,Wara li kkunsidra t-Trattat li jistabbilixxi l-Komunità Ewropea, u b'mod partikolari l-Artikolu 308 ta' dan it-Trattat,Wara li kkunsidra l-proposta tal-Kummissjoni, [1][1] ĠU CWara li kkunsidra l-opinjoni tal-Parlament Ewropew,Filwaqt li,(1) Il-Kunsill Ewropew enfasizza ripetutament ix-xewqa tiegħu għad-dħul fl-Unjoni Ewropea ta' Ċipru magħqud mill-ġdid. S' issa, soluzzjoni komprensiva għadha ma nstabitx.(2) Il-Kunsill tas-26 ta' April 2004, li kkunsidra li l-komunità Turko-Ċiprijotta esprima x-xewqa ċara tiegħu għal ġejjieni fi ħdan l-Unjoni Ewropea, irrakkomanda li l-fondi intenzjonati għan-naħa tat-Tramuntana ta' Ċipru fl-eventwalità li tinsab soluzzjoni għandhom jiġu użati biex jintemm l-iżolament ta' dik il-komunità u biex titħaffef ir-rijunifikazzjoni ta' Ċipru permezz tat-titjib ta' l-iżvilupp ekonomiku tal-komunità Turko-Ċiprijotta, b'enfasi partikolari fuq l-integrazzjoni ekonomika tal-gżira u fuq it-titjib tal-kuntatt bejn iż-żewġ komunitjaiet u l-UE.(3) Wara d-dħul ta' Ċipru fl-UE, l-applikazzjoni ta' l-acquis hija sospiża skond l-Artikolu 1(1) tal-Protokoll Nru. 10 ta' l-Att ta' Sħubija 2003 f' dawk l-inħawi li fuqhom l-Gvern tar-Repubblika ta' Ċipru ma jeżerċitax kontroll effettiv, (minn hawn il-quddiem jissejħu "iż-Żoni").(4) In segwitu għall-Artikolu 3(1) tal-Protokoll Nru 10, xejn f'dan il-Protokoll ma jipprekludi miżuri li jippromwovu l-iżvilupp ekonomiku taż-Żoni.(5) Bil-għan li jiġi allokat appoġġ finanzjarju bl-aktar mod effiċjenti u mgħaġġel, huwa mixtieq li jiġi pprovdut li l-għajnuna tista' tiġi mogħtija direttament lill-benefiċċjarji.(6) Skond l-Artikolu 2 tad-Direttiva tal-Kunsill 1999/468 [2] fejn huma mniżżla l-proċeduri għall-eżerċizzju tas-setgħat ta' implimentazzjoni li huma mogħtija lill-Kummissjoni, miżuri għall-implimentazzjoni ta' dan ir-Regolament għandhom jiġu adottati permezz tal-proċedura konsultattiva skond l-Artikolu 3 ta' dik id-Deċiżjoni.[2] ĠU L 184, tas-17.7.1999, p.23.(7) L-implimentazzjoni ta' dan ir-Regolament tikkontribwixxi, kif indikat hawn fuq, biex jintlaħqu l-għanijiet tal-Komunità, biss it-Trattat ma jipprovdix, għall-adozzjoni ta' dan ir-Regolament, setgħat ħlief dawk li għalihom hemm referenza fl-Artikolu 308,ADOTTA DAN IR-REGOLAMENT:Artikolu 1Għan ġenerali u Benefiċċjarji1. Il-Komunità ser tipprovdi għajnuna lill-komunità Turko-Ċiprijotta b'enfasi partikolari fuq l-iżvilupp ekonomiku, fuq l-integrazzjoni ekonomika tal-gżira, u fuq it-titjib tal-kuntatti bejn iż-żewġ komunitajiet u ma' l-UE biex tiġi ffaċilitata r-rijunifikazzjoni ta' Ċipru.2. Il-benefiċċjarji ta' l-assistenza ser ikunu, inter alia, l-awtoritajiet lokali, koperattivi u rappreżentanti tas-soċjeta ċivili, b'mod partikolari l-organizzazzjonijiet ta' l-imsieħba soċjali, għaqdiet għal-appoġġ ta' l-industrija, aġenziji pubbliċi, amministrazzjonijiet pubbliċi, komunitajiet lokali jew tradizzjonali, assoċjazzjonijiet, fondazzjonijiet, għaqdiet li ma joperawx bi profitt, għaqdiet non-governattivi u persuni naturali u legali.Artikolu 2GħanijietL-għajnuna ser tiġi użata biex tappoġġja inter alia:- l-allinjament progressiv ma' u l-preparazzjoni għall-implimentazzjoni ta' l-acquis communautaire- il-promozzjoni ta' żvilupp soċjali u ekonomiku li jinkludu r-ristrutturar, b'mod partikolari dak li għandu x'jaqsam ma' l-iżvilupp rurali, l-iżvilupp ta' riżorsi umani, kif ukoll żvilupp reġjonali.- l-iżvilupp u r-ristrutturar ta' l-infrastruttura, b'mod partikolari fl-oqsma ta' l-enerġija u t-trasport, l-ambjent, it-telekomunikazzjoni u l-provvista ta' l-ilma- ir-rikonċiljazzjoni, miżuri biex tinbena l-fiduċja u għajnuna lis-soċjetà ċivili- it-tqarrib tal-komunità Turko-Ċiprijotta lejn l-Unjoni, permezz ta' inter alia l-informazzjoni fuq is-sistema politika u legal ta' l-Unjoni Ewropea, il-promozzjoni ta' kuntatti bejn in-nies u boroż ta' studju għal studju fi Stati Membri oħra.Artikolu 3Ġestjoni ta' l-Għajnuna1. Il-Kummissjoni ser tkun responsabbli biex tiġi ġestita l-għajnuna.2. Il-Kummissjoni ser tkun megħjuna mill-Kumitat kif imniżżel fl-Artikolu 9 (1) tar-Regolament tal-Kunsill (KEE) Nru. 3906/89 [3], kompost minn rappreżentanti ta' l-Istati Membri u ppresedut minn rappreżentant tal-Kummissjoni.[3] ĠU L 375, tat-23.12.1989,p.11.3. Il-Kumitat ser jagħti l-opinjoni tiegħu dwar abbozzi ta' deċiżjonijijet ta' finanzjament, meta dawn huma ta' aktar minn EUR 5 miljun. Il-Kummissjoni tista' tapprova, mingħajr ma tfittex l-opinjoni tal-Kumitat, deċiżjonijiet ta' finanzjament dwar attivitajiet ta' appoġġ li jaqgħu taħt l-Artikolu 4 (3) ta' dan ir-Regolament, u emendi għal deċiżjonijiet ta' finanzjament li jħarsu l-għanijiet tal-programm u ma jaqbżux il-15% tal-pakkett finanzjarju.4. Fejn, skond il-paragrafu 3, il-Kumitat ma jiġix ikkonsultat dwar id-deċiżjonijiet ta' finanzjament, il-Kummissjoni ser tinfurmah, mhux aktar tard minn ġimgħa wara li tkun ittieħdet id-deċiżjoni.5. Għall-iskopijiet ta' dan ir-Regolament, il-proċedura konsultattiva li hija mniżżla taħt l-Artikolu 3 tad-Deċiżjoni 1999/468/EC ser tapplika, skond l-Artikolu 7 (3) ta' l-istess regolament.Artikolu 4Tipi ta' Għajnuna1. Għajnuna taħt dan ir-Regolament tista', inter alia, tiffinanzja kuntratti ta' prokura, għotjiet, li jinkludu sussidji għal rati ta' interess, self speċjali, garanziji fuq self u għajnuna finanzjarja.2. L-għajnuna tista' tiġi ffinanzjata bis-sħiħ mill-baġit fejn dan huwa ġustifikat u neċessarju biex jintlaħqu l-għanijiet ta' dan ir-Regolament3. L-għajnuna tista' tiġi użata wkoll biex jiġu koperti b'mod partikolari l-ispejjeż għal attitvitajiet ta' appoġġ bħalma huma studji preliminari u komparattivi, taħriġ, attivitajiet marbuta mal-preparazzjoni, il-kalkolu, il-ġestjoni, l-implimentazzjoni, is-sorveljanza, il-kontroll u l-evalwazzjoni ta' l-assistenza, l-attivitajiet marbuta ma' l-informazzjoni u skopijiet ta' viżibilità, kif ukoll l-ispejjeż għal personal ta' appoġġ, il-kiri ta' proprjetà u l-provvista ta' tagħmir.Artikolu 5L-implimentazzjoni ta' l-Għajnuna1. Azzjonijiet taħt dan ir-regolament ser jiġu implimentati skond ir-regoli mniżżla taħt it-Titolu IV tat-2 parti tar-Regolament tal-Kunsill 1605/2002 [4]. Kull impenn legali individwali li għandu x'jaqsam ma' l-għajnuna taħt dan ir-Regolament ser jiġi konkluż mhux aktar tard minn tliet snin wara d-data ta' l-impenn tal-baġit.[4] ĠU L 248, tas-16.9.2002, p.1.2. Il-Kummissjoni tista', fil-parametri stabbiliti fl-Artikolu 54 tar-Regolament 1605/2002, tiddeċiedi li tafda ċerti operati ta' awtorita pubblika, u b'mod partikolari operati ta' implimentazzjoni, lill-korpi elenkati taħt l-Artikolu 54 (2) ta' dan ir-Regolament. Il-kriterji ta' l-għazla għall-korpi elenkati taħt l-Artikolu 54 (2) c) huma li ġejjin:- statura rikonoxxuta internazzjonalment,- aderenza ma' sistemi ta' ġestjoni u kontroll rikonoxxuti internazzjonalment u- is-superviżjoni minn awtorità pubblika ta' Stat Membru jew minn għaqda/istituzzjoni internazzjonali.3. Azzjonijiet taħt dan ir-Regolament jistgħu jiġu implimentati permezz ta' ġestjoni konġjunta skond ir-regolamenti stabbiliti taħt it-Titoli I u II tat-2 parti tar-Regolament tal-Kunsill 1605/2002.Artikolu 6Il-ħarsien ta' l-interessi finanzjarji tal-Komunità1. Il-Kummissjoni ser tiżgura li, fejn azzjonijiet iffinanzjati taħt dan ir-Regolament huma implimentati, l-interessi finanzjarji tal-Komunità jiġu mħarsa permezz ta' l-applikazzjoni ta' miżuri ta' prevenzjoni tal-frodi, tal-korruzzjoni jew ta' kull attività illegali oħra, b'kontrolli effettivi u bl-irkuprar ta' l-ammonti li ġew imħallsa ta' xejn u, jekk jiġu innutati xi irregolaritajiet, permezz ta' ammendi effettivi, proporzjonali u dissważivi, in segwitu għar-Regolamenti tal-Kunsill (KE, EURATOM) Nru 2988/95 [5] u (EURATOM, KE) Nru 2185/96 [6], u mar-Regolament (KE) Nru 1073/1999 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill [7].[5] ĠU L 312, tat-23.12.1995, p.1.[6] ĠU L 292, tal-15.1.1996, p.2.[7] ĠU L 136, tal-31.5.1999, p.1.2. Għall-azzjonijiet Komunitarji li huma ffinanzjati skond dan ir-regolament, il-kunċett ta' irregolarità li għalih hemm referenza fl-Artikolu 1, paragrafu 2 tar-Regolament (KE, EURATOM) Nru 2988/95 ser ifisser li kull ksur ta' dispożizzjoni tal-liġi Komunitarja jew kull ksur ta' obbligazzjoni kuntrattwali li tirriżulta minn azzjoni jew omissjoni minn operatur ekonomiku li għandu jew ser ikollu, l-effett li jippreġudika l-baġit ġenerali tal-Komunitajiet jew baġits ġestiti minnhom, permezz ta' oġġett ta' nfiq mhux awtorizzat.3. Kull ftehim mal-benefiċċjarji għandu jipprovdi b'mod ċar għall-poter tal-Kummissjoni u tal-Qorti ta' l-Awdituri li jawditjaw, abbażi ta' dokumenti u fuq il-post, fuq kull kuntrattur u sub-kuntrattur li rċevew fondi mill-Komunità. Dak il-ftehim ser jawtorizza b'mod ċar lill-Kummissjoni biex tagħmel kontrolli u spezzjonijiet fuq il-post u ta' dak il-ħin skond id-dispożizzjonijiet ta' proċedura tar-Regolament tal-Kunsill (KE, EURATOM) Nru 2185/96.4. Kull kuntratt li jirriżulta mill-implimentazzjoni ta' l-għajnuna ser jiżgura d-dritt tal-Kummissjoni u tal-Qorti ta' l-Awdituri kif inhu in segwitu għall-paragrafu 3, waqt u wara t-twettiq tal-kuntratti.Artikolu 7Parteċipazzjoni f'tenders u kuntratti1. Il-parteċipazzjoni fil-għotja tal-prokura jew kuntratti ta' għajnuna ffinanzjati skond dan ir-Regolament ser tkun miftuħa għal:- persuni naturali jew legali kollha ta' l-Istati Membri ta' l-Unjoni Ewropea, inklużi dawk li huma residenti jew stabbiliti fiż-Żoni,- persuni naturali jew legali kollha li huma ċittadini ta', jew huma legalment stabbiliti fit-territorju ta' Stat Membru ieħor taż-Żona Ekonomika Ewropea,- persuni naturali jew legali kollha li huma ċittadini ta', jew li huma legalment stabbiliti fit-territorju tal-Pajjiżi Kandidati għas-Sħubija fl-Unjoni Ewropea,2. Il-parteċipazzjoni fil-għotja tal-prokura jew kuntratti ta' għajnuna ffinanzjati skond dan ir-Regolament ser tkun miftuħa għall-persuni naturali jew legali kollha li huma ċittadini ta', jew li huma legalment stabbiliti fit-territorju ta' kull pajjiż ieħor għajr dawk li għalihom hemm referenza fil-paragrafu 1 f'każijiet fejn aċċess reċiproku għall-għajnuna barranija ġie stabbilit.3. Il-parteċipazzjoni fil-għotja tal-prokura jew f'kuntratti ta' għajnuna ffinanzjata skond dan ir-Regolament, ser tkun miftuħa għal għaqdiet internazzjonali.4. Kull merkanzija u materjal mixtri in segwitu għal kuntratt li huwa ffinanzjat skond dan ir-Regolament għandu joriġina mill-Komunità, ż-Żoni jew pajjiż eliġibbli skond il-paragrafi (1) sa (2), kif imsemmi hawn fuq.5. Il-Kummissjoni tista' f'każijiet li ġew issostanzjati kif meħtieġ u fuq bażi ta' każ b'każ, tawtorizza l-parteċipazzjoni ta' persuni naturali u legali minn pajjiżi oħra jew l-użu ta' merkanzija u materjal minn oriġini differenti.Artikolu 8RappurtaġġKull sena l-Kummissjoni ser tibgħat rapport dwar l-implimentazzjoni ta' l-għajnuna Komunitarja fir-rigward ta' din l-iskema lill-Parlament Ewropew u lill-Kunsill. Dan ir-rapport ser ikollu informazzjoni dwar l-azzjonijiet iffinanzjati matul dik is-sena u dwar is-sejbiet waqt il-ħidma ta' monitoraġġ, u ser jagħti l-impressjonijiet tal-Kummissjoni dwar ir-riżultati milħuqa fl-implimentazzjoni ta' l-għajnuna.Artikolu 9Meta jintlaħaq ftehimMeta jintlaħaq ftehim komprensiv dwar il-problema ta' Ċipru, il-Kunsill ser, abbażi ta' proposta mill-Kummissjoni, jiddeċiedi unanimament dwar l-emendi lil dan ir-Regolament preżenti.Artikolu 10Dħul fis-seħħDan ir-Regolament ser jidħol fis-seħħ fit-tielet jum wara l-jum li jkun ġie ppubllikat fil-Ġurnal Uffiċjali ta' l-Unjoni Ewropea.Dan ir-Regolament ser jorbot fl-intier tiegħu u ser japplika direttament fl-Istati Membri kollha.Magħmul fi Brussel,Għall-KunsillIl-PresidentLEGISLATIVE FINANCIAL STATEMENTPolicy area(s): ENLARGEMENTActivit(y/ies): Assistance to encourage economic development of the Turkish Cypriot community to facilitate reunificationTitle of action:Financial support for encouraging the economic development of the Turkish Cypriot community1. BUDGET LINE(S) + HEADING(S)22.01.04.07 - Financial support for encouraging the economic development of the Turkish Cypriot Community - Expenditure on administrative management22.02.11 - Financial support for encouraging the economic development of the Turkish Cypriot Community2. OVERALL FIGURES2.1. Total allocation for action (Part B): 259 EUR million for commitment2.2. Period of application: 2004-2006 for commitments2.3. Overall multiannual estimate of expenditure:(a) Schedule of commitment appropriations/payment appropriations (financial intervention) (see point 6.1.1)EUR million (to three decimal places)>TABELPOSITION>(b) Technical and administrative assistance and support expenditure(see point 6.1.2)>TABELPOSITION>>TABELPOSITION>(c) Overall financial impact of human resources and other administrative expenditure(see points 7.2 and 7.3)>TABELPOSITION>>TABELPOSITION>2.4. Compatibility with financial programming and financial perspective[X] Proposal is compatible with existing financial programming.See Point 5.2 for details about the heading of the financial perspective.Proposal will entail reprogramming of the relevant heading in the financial perspective.Proposal may require application of the provisions of the Interinstitutional Agreement.2.5. Financial impact on revenue:[X] Proposal has no financial implications (involves technical aspects regarding implementation of a measure)ORProposal has financial impact - the effect on revenue is as follows:(NB All details and observations relating to the method of calculating the effect on revenue should be shown in a separate annex.)(EUR million to one decimal place)>TABELPOSITION>(Please specify each budget line involved, adding the appropriate number of rows to the table if there is an effect on more than one budget line.)3. BUDGET CHARACTERISTICS>TABELPOSITION>4. LEGAL BASISCommission proposal of ... for a Council Regulation establishing an instrument of financial support for encouraging the economic development of the Turkish Cypriot community (COM...)5. DESCRIPTION AND GROUNDS5.1. Need for Community intervention5.1.1. Objectives pursuedFinancial support aiming at facilitating the reunification of Cyprus by encouraging the social and economic development of the northern part with particular emphasis on the economic integration, on bringing closer the two communities, and on alignment with and preparation for the acquis communautaire.5.1.2. Measures taken in connection with ex ante evaluation(a) Not applicable.(b) The lesson learned for the action envisaged is the one deriving from the accession aid delivered to the ten new Member States. In addition, all projects and all programmes will be ex-ante evaluated according to the established practice and in compliance with the criteria of sound financial management.5.1.3. Measures taken following ex post evaluationNot applicable, although some feedback from the experience gathered from the pre-accession programmes will be used.5.2. Action envisaged and budget intervention arrangementsAppropriations will be committed from 2004 to 2006. The implementation of the assistance will take place over a period from 2004 through 2009. The financial assistance will focus on large infrastructure projects such as sewerage treatment, power plants, renovation and development of transport infrastructure projects including to develop links between the Cypriot communities, as well as social and economic development, such as SME support and reduction of the economic disparities. In the northern part, during the last 30 years, no major infrastructure investments have been undertaken.As regards alignment with and preparation for the acquis, TAIEX will be the main implementing instrument. Part of the credits will be used for this purpose.Priority will be given in particular to the following objectives :- the promotion of social and economic development, in particular concerning rural development, human resources development and regional development,- the development and restructuring of infrastructure, in particular in the areas of energy, environment (including water supply), telecommunications and transport (including projects to develop links between the Cypriot communities),- reconciliation and confidence building measures, including support to civil society,- improved understanding of the European Union's political and legal order,- promotion of youth exchange and scholarships,- progressive alignment with the acquis communautaire and preparation for implementation of the acquis.The assistance to facilitate the reunification of Cyprus by encouraging the economic and social development of the Turkish Cypriot community will focus on :Investments in the field of infrastructure, transport and environment projects such as waste disposal, sewerage and improvement of the water supply, water quality and the distribution system. Rural development as well as measures concerning SME's will be a further major project for economic development. In the field of social policy, labour market policies, vocational training and treatment of illegal immigrant workers will be developed with the social partners.The projects will be identified as regards their objectives, costs, duration and sustainability via a series of feasibility studies.In the field of reconciliation and confidence building measures, bi-communal projects e.g. such as those included in the Nicosia Masterplan will be proposed. Non-governmental organisations could also benefit from the assistance with a view to supporting initiatives and common projects of the two communities.For the alignment with and preparation for the acquis communautaire, technical support measures will play an important role.The EUR 259 million package was originally earmarked under headings 1, 2 and 3 but only in case of a political settlement in accordance with the table 1b of the revised financial perspective [8]. However, in the absence of a settlement, no existing heading of the Financial Perspective precisely covers the intended expenditure directed towards areas of a member state where the government does not exercise effective control and where the application of the acquis is suspended. The package is now aiming at facilitating the reunification of Cyprus by encouraging the economic development with particular emphasis on the economic integration of the island, and by improving contacts between the two communities and with the EU. Besides reconciliation and confidence building measures, and because of the isolation of this community these last years, the activities will have a strong focus on helping with Community acquis approximation, especially as regards investments to comply with European norms, inter alia, in the environmental and transport areas as described above. Therefore, most of the activities will be similar to pre-accession activities financed under Heading 7 which appears as the most suitable heading of the financial perspective to host this particular assistance.[8] Decision 2003/429/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 May 2003.5.3. Methods of implementationThe overall responsibility for dealing with the issues concerning the Turkish-Cypriot community, including programming and coordination of the assistance will be entrusted to a core team in DG Enlargement in Brussels. The implementation of the aid will be organised through an aid delivery team at headquarters and on the ground in charge of project identification, tendering, contracting, implementation, monitoring, payments, evaluation, auditing and through a presence in the field through an office.The overall impact on resources will amount to 7 permanent officials and 28 external staff.The Commission is envisaging the possibility to use an agency, more precisely the European Agency for Reconstruction, as this Agency could be the most efficient way for implementing the part of the package related to large infrastructure projects. The pool of expertise readily available could be rapidly made operational on the ground. However, this option, together with other possibilities, needs to be further analyzed and the Commission will decide later. It needs to be noted that should the Commission propose to extend the geographical coverage of the Agency , the proposal would still be consistent with the conclusions of the evaluation recently published along with the proposal to limit its duration to end 2006. Since this package, like the CARDS Regulation, is programmed up to end-2006, the mandate of the Agency would still be consistent with the mandate under this Regulation.In terms of budgetary consequences, under the Agency option, the team of 25 external staff and 2 permanent officials in charge of the aid delivery would no longer be necessary. The budget of the agency will be adapted and amended to take into account the extension of its mandate.6. FINANCIAL IMPACT6.1. Total financial impact on Part B - (over the entire programming period)(The method of calculating the total amounts set out in the table below must be explained by the breakdown in Table 6.2. )6.1.1. Financial interventionCommitments (in EUR million to three decimal places)>TABELPOSITION>6.1.2. Technical and administrative assistance, support expenditure and IT expenditure (commitment appropriations)>TABELPOSITION>6.2. Calculation of costs by measure envisaged in Part B (over the entire programming period) [9][9] For further information, see separate explanatory note.(Where there is more than one action, give sufficient detail of the specific measures to be taken for each one to allow the volume and costs of the outputs to be estimated.)Commitments (in EUR million to three decimal places)>TABELPOSITION>If necessary explain the method of calculation7. IMPACT ON STAFF AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENDITURE7.1. Impact on human resources>TABELPOSITION>Les besoins en ressources humaines et administratives seront couverts à l'intérieur de la dotation allouée à la DG gestionnaire dans le cadre de la procédure d'allocation annuelle.7.2. Overall financial impact of human resources>TABELPOSITION>The amounts are total expenditure for twelve months.The new administrative support item 22 01 04 07 will be accompanied as from 2005 by the following budgetary comment:expenditure on temporary support staff (auxiliaries, detached national experts, staff from employment agencies) at headquarters limited to EUR 3.000.000 corresponding to an estimated 28 men/years. This estimate is based on a provisional annual unit cost per man-year, of which 75% is accounted for by remuneration for the staff concerned and 25% by the additional cost of training, meetings, missions, IT, telecommunications and eventual rent of premises on the ground. This new sub-ceiling for a limited number of staff at headquarters is proposed for accompanying the management of files at headquarters as the specific political situation of the areas of northern Cyprus does not allow for the opening of a delegation. It has, by definition, a transitory and temporary nature strictly linked to the direct management of the implementation of this new programme.7.3. Other administrative expenditure deriving from the action>TABELPOSITION>The amounts are total expenditure for twelve months.1 Specify the type of committee and the group to which it belongs.I. Annual total (7.2 + 7.3)II. Duration of actionIII. Total cost of action (I x II) // 3,077,000 EUR2 years (2005-2006)6,154,000 EUR8. FOLLOW-UP AND EVALUATION8.1. Follow-up arrangements(Adequate follow-up information must be collected, from the start of each action, on the inputs, outputs and results of the intervention. In practice this means (i) identifying the indicators for inputs, outputs and results and (ii) putting in place methods for the collection of data).- Indicateurs d'output (mesure des activités déployées- Le nombre et la diversité des infrastructures, des secteurs économiques, des administrations et des citoyens concernés par les projets- Indicateurs d'impact selon les objectifs poursuivis- L'impact sur l'évolution du revenu per capita- L'impact sur les infrastructures et notamment leur modernisation et leur conformité avec les normes de l'Union européenne- La diminution des disparités économiques régionales- L'amélioration de la gestion des administrations- L'accès à de nouvelles technologies- Le transfert de savoir-faire- L'impact sur l'agriculture- L'impact sur la création d'emplois8.2. Arrangements and schedule for the planned evaluationLes projets seront contrôlés et évalués périodiquement par les organes chargés de leur exécution, par les services de la Commission et par des experts indépendants.L'achèvement de l'action donnera lieu à un rapport d'évaluation sur son contenu, le coût-bénéfice, le suivi à apporter et en particulier sur la réalisation des objectifs.9. ANTI-FRAUD MEASURESDes contrôles seront effectués à tous niveaux de la mise en oeuvre des projets (appel d'offres, sélection, élaboration des contrats, prestations des services, paiements) par les services de la Commission ainsi que par la Cour des Comptes. Les vérifications tiennent compte des obligations contractuelles, des principes de gestion financière saine et efficace. Des dispositions de contrôle (remise de rapports, concertation avec la Commission, etc.° seront incluses dans tous les accords ou contrats conclus entre la Commission et les bénéficiaires des paiements.


type: contracts

jurisdiction: EU

text:
 Fógra dlíthiúil tábhachtach
 |
 12008M/PRO/05
 Leagan comhdhlúite den Chonradh ar an Aontas Eorpach - PRÓTACAIL - Prótacal (Uimh. 5) ar reacht an Bhainc Eorpaigh Infheistíochta
 Official Journal 115 , 09/05/2008 P. 0251 - 0264
 PRÓTACAL (Uimh. 5)AR REACHT AN BHAINC EORPAIGH INFHEISTÍOCHTATÁ NA hARDPHÁIRTITHE CONARTHACHA,ÓS MIAN LEO Reacht an Bhainc Eorpaigh Infheistíochta dá bhforáiltear in Airteagal 308 den Chonradh ar Fheidhmiú an Aontais Eorpaigh a chinneadh,TAR ÉIS COMHAONTÚ ar na forálacha seo a leanas, a chuirfear i gceangal leis an gConradh ar an Aontas Eorpach agus leis an gConradh ar Fheidhmiú an Aontais Eorpaigh:Airteagal 1Comhdhéantar leis seo an Banc Eorpach Infheistíochta a bunaíodh le hAirteagal 308 den Chonradh ar Fheidhmiú an Aontais Eorpaigh (dá ngairtear an "Banc" anseo feasta); comhlíonfaidh sé a fheidhmeanna agus déanfaidh sé a ghníomhaíochtaí de réir fhorálacha na gConarthaí agus an Reachta seo.Airteagal 2Sainítear le hAirteagal 309 den Chonradh ar Fheidhmiú an Aontais Eorpaigh an cúram a bheidh ar an mBanc.Airteagal 3I gcomhréir le hAirteagal 308 den Chonradh ar Fheidhmiú an Aontais Eorpaigh, is iad na Ballstáit comhaltaí an Bhainc.Airteagal 41. Is é is caipiteal don Bhanc 164808169000 EUR, arna shuibscríobh ag na Ballstáit mar a leanas:An Ghearmáin | 26649532500 |An Fhrainc | 26649532500 |An Iodáil | 26649532500 |An Ríocht Aontaithe | 26649532500 |An Spáinn | 15989719500 |An Bheilg | 7387065000 |An Ísiltír | 7387065000 |An tSualainn | 4900585500 |An Danmhairg | 3740283000 |An Ostair | 3666973500 |An Pholainn | 3411263500 |An Fhionlainn | 2106816000 |An Ghréig | 2003725500 |An Phortaingéil | 1291287000 |Poblacht na Seice | 1258785500 |An Ungáir | 1190868500 |Éire | 935070000 |An Rómáin | 863514500 |An tSlóvaic | 428490500 |An tSlóivéin | 397815000 |An Bhulgáir | 290917500 |An Liotuáin | 249617500 |Lucsamburg | 187015500 |An Chipir | 183382000 |An Laitvia | 152335000 |An Eastóin | 117640000 |Málta | 69804000 |Ní bheidh na Ballstáit faoi dhliteanas ach amháin go feadh méid a scaire den chaipiteal a suibscríobhadh agus nár íocadh.2. Má ligtear isteach comhalta nua bhéarfaidh sin méadú ar an gcaipiteal suibscríofa i gcomhréir lena dtabharfaidh an comhalta nua de chaipiteal isteach.3. Féadfaidh an Bord Gobharnóirí, ag gníomhú dó d'aon toil, a chinneadh go méadófar an caipiteal suibscríofa.4. Ní féidir scair chomhalta sa chaipiteal suibscríofa a aistriú, a chur i ngeall ná a astú.Airteagal 51. Íocfaidh na Ballstáit an caipiteal suibscríofa go feadh 5 % ar mheán na méideanna a shonraítear in Airteagal 4(1).2. I gcás méadú a theacht ar an gcaipiteal suibscríofa, socróidh an Bord Gobharnóirí, ag gníomhú dó d'aon toil, an céatadán a bheidh le híoc agus modh a íoctha. Déanfar na híocaíochtaí in airgead tirim go heisiach in euro.3. Féadfaidh an Bord Stiúrthóirí a cheangal go ndéanfar iarmhéid an chaipitil shuibscríofa a íoc, a mhéad is gá don Bhanc chun freastal dá oibleagáidí.An íocaíocht a bheidh le déanamh amhlaidh ag gach Ballstát, beidh sí i gcomhréir lena scair den chaipiteal suibscríofa.Airteagal 6(sean-Airteagal 8)Beidh an Banc á stiúradh agus á bhainistiú ag Bord Gobharnóirí, Bord Stiúrthóirí agus Coiste Bainistíochta.Airteagal 7(sean-Airteagal 9)1. Is iad a bheidh ar an mBord Gobharnóirí na hAirí a bheidh ceaptha ag na Ballstáit.2. Leagfaidh an Bord Gobharnóirí síos treoracha ginearálta do bheartas creidmheasa an Bhainc, i gcomhréir le cuspóirí an Aontais.Féachfaidh an Bord Gobharnóirí chuige go gcuirfear na treoracha sin i ngníomh.3. Ina theannta sin déanfaidh an Bord Gobharnóirí mar a leanas:(a) cinnfidh sé an bhfuil an caipiteal suibscríofa le méadú de réir Airteagal 4(3) agus Airteagal 5(2);(b) chun críocha Airteagal 9(1), cinnfidh sé na prionsabail is infheidhme ar na hoibríochtaí maoinithe a ghabhfar ar láimh faoi chuimsiú chúram an Bhainc;(c) feidhmeoidh sé na cumhachtaí dá bhforáiltear in Airteagail 9 agus 11 maidir le comhaltaí an Bhord Stiúrthóirí agus an Choiste Bainistíochta a cheapadh agus lena scor go héigeantach, mar aon leis na cumhachtaí a fhoráiltear sa dara fomhír d'Airteagal 11(1);(d) glacfaidh sé cinntí maidir le maoiniú a dheonú le haghaidh oibríochtaí infheistíochta atá le cur i gcrích, go hiomlán nó go páirteach, lasmuigh de chríocha na mBallstát i gcomhréir le hAirteagal 16(1);(e) formheasfaidh sé tuarascáil bhliantúil an Bhord Stiúrthóirí;(f) formheasfaidh sé an clár comhardaithe bliantúil maille leis an gcuntas sochair agus dochair;(g) feidhmeoidh sé na cumhachtaí agus na feidhmeanna dá bhforáiltear sa Reacht seo;(h) formheasfaidh sé rialacha nós imeachta an Bhainc.4. Faoi chuimsiú an Chonartha agus an Reachta seo, beidh an Bord Gobharnóirí inniúil ar aon chinntí a ghlacadh, ag gníomhú dó d'aon toil, a bhaineann le fionraí oibríochtaí an Bhainc agus, dá dtarlódh sin, lena leachtú.Airteagal 8(sean-Airteagal 10)Mura bhforáiltear a mhalairt sa Reacht seo, is trí thromlach dá chomhaltaí a dhéanfaidh an Bord Gobharnóirí cinntí. Ní mór an tromlach sin a bheith in ionannas le 50 % ar a laghad den chaipiteal suibscríofa.Is gá ocht vóta dhéag agus 68 % den chaipiteal suibscríofa ina fhabhar do thromlach cáilithe.Ní chuirfidh staonadh ó vótáil ag comhaltaí a bheidh i láthair go pearsanta nó a mbeidh ionadaithe ag feidhmiú thar a gceann cosc ar chinntí a ghlacadh.Airteagal 9(sean-Airteagal 11)1. Glacfaidh an Bord Stiúrthóirí cinntí maidir le maoiniú a dheonú, go háirithe i bhfoirm iasachtaí agus ráthaíochtaí, agus maidir le hiasachtaí a chruinniú; socróidh sé na rátaí úis ar iasachtaí a dheonófar agus an coimisiún agus muirir eile. Féadfaidh sé cuid dá fheidhmeanna a tharmligean chuig an gCoiste Bainistíochta ar bhonn cinnidh arna ghlacadh trí thromlach cáilithe. Cinnfidh sé na téarmaí agus na coinníollacha do tharmligean den sórt sin agus maoirseoidh sé a fhorghníomhú.Féachfaidh an Bord Stiúrthóirí chuige go bhfuil an Banc á rith mar is cuí; áiritheoidh sé go bhfuil an Banc á bhainistiú i gcomhréir le forálacha na gConarthaí agus an Reachta agus i gcomhréir leis na treoracha ginearálta a leagfaidh an Bord Gobharnóirí síos.I ndeireadh na bliana airgeadais, cuirfidh an Bord Stiúrthóirí tuarascáil faoi bhráid an Bhord Gobharnóirí agus foilseoidh sé í tar éis a formheasta.2. Ocht stiúrthóir is fiche agus ocht stiúrthóir malartacha déag a bheidh ar an mBord Stiúrthóirí.Déanfaidh an Bord Gobharnóirí na Stiúrthóirí a cheapadh go ceann cúig bliana, stiúrthóir amháin arna ainmniú ag gach Ballstát, agus stiúrthóir amháin arna ainmniú ag an gCoimisiún.Déanfaidh an Bord Gobharnóirí na malartaigh a cheapadh go ceann cúig bliana mar a thaispeántar thíos:- beirt mhalartach arna n-ainmniú ag Poblacht Chónaidhme na Gearmáine,- beirt mhalartach arna n-ainmniú ag Poblacht na Fraince,- beirt mhalartach arna n-ainmniú ag Poblacht na hIodáile,- beirt mhalartach arna n-ainmniú ag Ríocht Aontaithe na Breataine Móire agus Thuaisceart Éireann,- malartach amháin arna ainmniú de thoil a chéile ag Ríocht na Spáinne agus ag Poblacht na Portaingéile- malartach amháin arna ainmniú de thoil a chéile ag Ríocht na Beilge, Ard-Diúcacht Lucsamburg agus ag Ríocht na hÍsiltíre,- beirt mhalartach arna n-ainmniú de thoil a chéile ag Ríocht na Danmhairge, ag an bPoblacht Heilléanach, ag Éirinn agus ag an Rómáin,- beirt mhalartach arna ainmniú de thoil a chéile ag Poblacht na hEastóine, ag Poblacht na Laitvia, ag Poblacht na Liotuáine, ag Poblacht na hOstaire, ag Poblacht na Fionlainne agus ag Ríocht na Sualainne,- triúr malartach arna n-ainmniú de thoil a chéile ag Poblacht na Bulgáire, ag Poblacht na Seice, ag Poblacht na Cipire, ag Poblacht na hUngáire, ag Poblacht Mhálta, ag Poblacht na Polainne, ag Poblacht na Slóivéine agus ag Poblacht na Slóvaice,- malartach amháin arna ainmniú ag an gCoimisiún.Comhthoghfaidh an Bord Stiúrthóirí seisear saineolaithe gan ceart vótála: triúr mar chomhaltaí agus triúr mar mhalartaigh.Féadfar ceapacháin na stiúrthóirí agus na malartach a athnuachan.Leagfar síos leis na Rialacha Nós Imeachta na socruithe maidir le bheith rannpháirteach i gcruinnithe den Bhord Stiúrthóirí agus na forálacha is infheidhme ar mhalartaigh agus ar shaineolaithe arna gcomhthoghadh.Beidh Uachtarán an Choiste Bainistíochta nó, má bhíonn sé as láthair, duine dá Leas-Uachtaráin, i gceannas ar chruinnithe den Bhord Stiúrthóirí, ach ní vótálfaidh sé.Roghnófar comhaltaí an Bhord Stiúrthóirí as daoine nach bhfuil a neamhspleáchas ná a n-inniúlacht inchurtha in amhras; ní bheidh siad freagrach ach amháin don Bhanc.3. Ní fhéadfaidh an Bord Gobharnóirí stiúrthóir a scor go héigeantach ach amháin sa chás nach bhfuil na coinníollacha is gá chun a dhualgais a dhéanamh á gcomhlíonadh aige a thuilleadh; ní foláir don Bhord gníomhú trí thromlach cáilithe.Mura dtugtar formheas ar an tuarascáil bhliantúil, éireoidh an Bord Stiúrthóirí as oifig.4. Aon fholúntas a tharlóidh trí bhás comhalta, nó trína éirí as oifig dá dheoin féin, nó trína éirí as go héigeantach, nó trí chomhaltaí d'éirí as d'aon bhuíon, líonfar é de réir mhír 2 den Airteagal seo. Ach amháin i gcás an Bord Stiúrthóirí ar fad a athrú, gabhfar ionad comhalta go ceann a bhfuil fágtha dá théarma oifige.5. Cinnfidh an Bord Gobharnóirí an luach saothair do chomhaltaí an Bhord Stiúrthóirí. Leagfaidh an Bord Gobharnóirí síos cad iad na gníomhaíochtaí nach luíonn le dualgais stiúrthóra nó mhalartaigh.Airteagal 10(sean-Airteagal 12)1. Beidh vóta amháin ag gach stiúrthóir ar an mBord Stiúrthóirí. Féadfaidh sé a vóta a tharmligean i ngach cás, ar an modh a leagfar sios le rialacha nós imeachta an Bhainc.2. Mura bhforáiltear a mhalairt sa Reacht seo, is trí thromlach trian ar a laghad dá chomhaltaí atá i dteideal vótáil agus iad in ionannas le caoga faoin gcéad ar a laghad den chaipiteal suibscríofa a dhéanfaidh an Bord Stiúrthóirí cinntí. Do thromlach cáilithe is gá ocht vóta dhéag ina fhabhar agus seasca a hocht faoin gcéad den chaipiteal suibscríofa. Leagfar síos i rialacha nós imeachta an Bhainc an córam is gá chun gur bailí iad cinntí an Bhord Stiúrthóirí.Airteagal 11(sean-Airteagal 13)1. Beidh ar an gCoiste Bainistíochta Uachtarán agus ochtar Leas-Uachtarán arna gceapadh ag an mBord Gobharnóirí go ceann tréimhse sé bliana ar thogra ón mBord Stiúrthóirí. Féadfar na ceapacháin sin a athnuachan.Féadfaidh an Bord Gobharnóirí, ag gníomhú dó d'aon toil, líon na gcomhaltaí ar an gCoiste Bainistíochta a athrú.2. Ar thogra ón mBord Stiúrthóirí arna ghlacadh trí thromlach cáilithe, féadfaidh an Bord Gobharnóirí, ag gníomhú dó trí thromlach cáilithe freisin, comhalta den Choiste Bainistíochta a scor go héigeantach.3. Beidh an Coiste Bainistíochta freagrach i ngnóthaí reatha an Bhainc, faoi údarás an Uachtaráin agus faoi mhaoirseacht an Bhord Stiúrthóirí.Ullmhóidh sé cinntí an Bhord Stiúrthóirí, go háirithe cinntí i dtaobh iasachtaí a chruinniú agus i dtaobh iasachtaí agus maoiniú a dheonú, go háirithe i bhfoirm iasachtaí agus ráthaíochtaí; féachfaidh sé chuige go gcuirfear na cinntí sin i ngníomh.4. Gníomhóidh an Coiste Bainistíochta trí thromlach ag tabhairt tuairimí dó ar thograí chun iasachtaí a chruinniú nó maoiniú a dheonú, go háirithe i bhfoirm iasachtaí agus ráthaíochtaí.5. Cinnfidh an Bord Gobharnóirí luach saothair comhaltaí an Choiste Bainistíochta agus leagfaidh síos cad iad na gníomhaíochtaí nach luíonn lena ndualgais.6. Feidhmeoidh an tUachtarán nó, mura féidir dó é, Leas-Uachtarán, ar son an Bhainc in ábhair dhlíthiúla agus in ábhair eile.7. Beidh foireann an Bhainc faoi údarás an Uachtaráin. Is é a fhostóidh agus a scoirfidh iad. Chun foireann a roghnú, cuirfear san áireamh ní hamháin cumas agus cáilíochtaí pearsanta ach ina theannta sin ionadaíocht chothromais náisiúnaigh na mBallstát. Cinnfear leis na Rialacha Nós Imeachta cad é an comhlacht is inniúil chun forálacha a bheidh infheidhme maidir leis an bhfoireann a ghlacadh.8. Ní bheidh Coiste Bainistíochta agus foireann an Bhainc freagrach ach don Bhanc amháin agus beidh siad neamhspleách ar fad i gcomhlíonadh a ndualgas.Airteagal 12(sean-Airteagal 14)1. Déanfaidh Coiste ar a mbeidh sé chomhalta, arna gceapadh ag an mBord Gobharnóirí ar bhonn a n-inniúlachta, a fhíorú gach bliain go gcomhlíonann gníomhaíochtaí an Bhainc dea-chleachtas baincéireachta agus beidh sé freagrach as a chuntais a iniúchadh.2. Déanfaidh an Coiste dá dtagraítear i mír 1 a chinntiú gach bliain gur seoladh oibríochtaí an Bhainc agus gur coimeádadh a leabhair ar mhodh cuí. Chuige sin, fíoróidh sé go ndearnadh oibríochtaí an Bhainc a sheoladh ar cothrom leis na foirmiúlachtaí agus na nósanna imeachta dá bhforáiltear leis an Reacht seo agus leis na Rialacha Nós Imeachta.3. Daingneoidh an Coiste dá dtagraítear i mír 1 go dtugann na ráitis airgeadais mar aon le gach faisnéis airgeadais eile dá bhfuil sna cuntais bhliantúla arna dtarraingt suas ag an mBord Stiúrthóirí léargas fíorcheart ar riocht airgeadais an Bhainc i dtaca lena shochair agus a dhochair, agus ar thorthaí a chuid oibríochtaí agus a shreafaí airgid thirim don bhliain airgeadais faoi bhreithniú.4. Sonrófar leis na Rialacha Nós Imeachta na cáilíochtaí atá riachtanach do chomhaltaí an Choiste agus leagfaidh sé síos na téarmaí agus na coinníollacha do ghníomhaíocht an Choiste dá dtagraítear i mír 1.Airteagal 13(sean-Airteagal 15)Déileálfaidh an Banc le gach Ballstát tríd an údarás a bheidh ceaptha ag an Stát sin. Ag seoladh a oibríochtaí airgeadais dó, rachaidh an Banc ar iontaoibh bhanc ceannais náisiúnta an Bhallstáit atá i gceist nó institiúidí eile airgeadais a bheidh formheasta ag an Stát sin.Airteagal 14(sean-Airteagal 16)1. Comhoibreoidh an Banc le gach eagraíocht idirnáisiúnta atá gníomhach i réimeanna cosúil lena chuid féin.2. Féachfaidh an Banc le comhtheagmhálacha cuí a bhunú ar mhaithe leis an gcomhoibriú le hinstitiúidí baincéireachta agus airgeadais sna tíortha a sroicheann a oibríochtaí chucu.Airteagal 15(sean-Airteagal 17)Arna iarraidh sin do Bhallstát nó don Choimisiún, nó uaidh féin, déanfaidh an Bord Gobharnóirí, de réir na gcoinníollacha céanna a bhain lena nglacadh, na treoracha a bheidh leagtha síos aige faoi Airteagal 7 den Reacht seo a léiriú nó a fhorlíonadh.Airteagal 16(sean-Airteagal 18)1. Faoi chuimsiú an chúraim atá leagtha amach in Airteagal 309 den Chonradh ar Fheidhmiú an Aontais Eorpaigh, deonóidh an Banc maoiniú, go háirithe i bhfoirm iasachtaí agus ráthaíochtaí dá chomhaltaí nó do ghnóthais phríobháideacha nó phoiblí le haghaidh infheistíochtaí a bheidh le cur in éifeacht i gcríocha Ballstát, sa mhéid nach bhfuil cistí le fáil ó fhoinsí eile ar théarmaí réasúnta.Ach trí chinneadh ón mBord Gobharnóirí, ag gníomhú dó trí thromlach cáilithe ar thogra ón mBord Stiúrthóirí, féadfaidh an Banc maoiniú a dheonú le haghaidh infheistíochtaí a bheidh le cur in éifeacht, go hiomlán nó go páirteach, lasmuigh de chríocha Ballstát.2. Chomh fada agus is féidir, ní dheonófar iasachtaí ach ar an gcoinníoll go n-úsáidfear foinsí eile airgeadais freisin.3. Nuair a bheidh iasacht á deonú aige do ghnóthas nó do chomhlacht seachas Ballstát, cuirfidh an Banc de choinníoll leis an iasacht sin go bhfaighfear ráthaíocht ón mBallstát ar ina chríoch atá an infheistíocht le cur in éifeacht nó go bhfaighfear ráthaíochtaí leormhaithe eile nó go mbeidh láidreacht airgeadais ag an bhféichiúnaí.Fairis sin, i gcomhréir leis na prionsabail arna mbunú ag an mBord Gobharnóirí de bhun Airteagal 7(3)(b), agus nuair is gá sin chun na tionscadail dá bhforáiltear in Airteagal 309 den Chonradh ar Fheidhmiú an Aontais Eorpaigh a chur chun feidhme, socróidh an Bord Stiúrthóirí, ag gníomhú dó trí thromlach cáilithe, téarmaí agus coinníollacha aon oibríochta um maoiniú a bhfuil próifíl riosca shonrach ag gabháil léi agus a mheastar mar sin mar ghníomhaíocht speisialta.4. Féadfaidh an Banc iasachtaí a ráthú a thógfaidh gnóthais phoiblí nó phríobháideacha nó a thógfaidh comhlachtaí eile chun tionscadail dá bhforáiltear in Airteagal 309 de na Conarthaí a chur in éifeacht.5. An méid comhiomlán a bheidh amuigh tráth ar bith d'iasachtaí agus de ráthaíochtaí ón mBanc, ní mó é ná 250 % dá chaipiteal suibscríofa, dá chúlchistí, dá sholáthairtí neamhchionroinnte agus den bharrachas ón gcuntas brabúis agus caillteanais. Laghdófar an méid comhiomlán sin méid is ionann agus an méid atá suibscríofa, bíodh nó ná bíodh sé íoctha isteach, i gcomhair aon rannpháirtíochta cothromais de chuid an Bhainc.Méid na rannpháirtíochtaí cothromais de chuid an Bhainc atá íoctha amach, ní mó é tráth ar bith ná méid is comhfhreagrach le hiomlán a chaipitil shuibscríofa atá íoctha isteach, a chúlchistí, a sholáthairtí neamhchionroinnte agus a bharrachas ón gcuntas brabúis agus caillteanais.Mar eisceacht, beidh ag gníomhaíochtaí speisialta an Bhainc, arna gcinneadh ag an mBord Gobharnóirí agus ag an mBord Stiúrthóirí i gcomhréir le mír 3, cionroinnt shonrach cúlchiste.Beidh feidhm ag an mír seo freisin maidir le cuntais chomhdhlúite an Bhainc.6. Cosnóidh an Banc é féin in aghaidh fiontar malairte trí cibé clásail is cuí leis a chur isteach i gconarthaí le haghaidh iasachtaí agus ráthaíochtaí.Airteagal 17(sean-Airteagal 19)1. Déanfar na rátaí úis ar iasachtaí ón mBanc agus coimisiún agus muirir eile a oiriúnú do na coinníollacha atá i dtreis ar mhargadh an chaipitil agus iad a ríomh ar dhóigh go gcuirfidh an t-ioncam astu ar chumas an Bhainc freastal dá oibleagáidí, a chaiteachais agus a rioscaí a ghlanadh agus cúlchiste a thiomargadh mar a fhoráiltear in Airteagal 22.2. Ní dheonóidh an Banc aon laghdú ar rátaí úis. I gcás inar cosúil gur mhaith an rud é an t-ús a laghdú mar gheall ar an saghas infheistíochta atá le maoiniú, féadfaidh an Ballstát atá i gceist nó gníomhaireacht éigin eile cabhair a thabhairt chun íoctha an úis, sa mhéid go luífidh sin le hAirteagal 107 den Chonradh ar Fheidhmiú an Aontais Eorpaigh.Airteagal 18(sean-Airteagal 20)Ina oibríochtaí i ndáil le maoiniú, urramóidh an Banc na prionsabail seo a leanas:1. Féachfaidh sé chuige go n-úsáidfear a chistí ar an gcuma is réasúnaí is féidir ar mhaithe le leasanna an Aontais.Ní fhéadfaidh sé iasachtaí ná ráthaíochtaí a thabhairt ach amháin:(a) más rud é, i gcás infheistíochtaí atá á gcur in éifeacht ag gnóthais in earnáil an táirgthe, go bhfuil íocaíochtaí in aghaidh úis agus amúchta á gcumhdach as brabúis oibriúcháin nó, i gcás infheistíochtaí eile, trí oibleagáidí faoina ndeachaigh an Stát a bhfuil an infheistíocht á cur in éifeacht ann nó ar mhodh éigin eile; agus(b) más rud é go gcuidíonn feidhmiú na hinfheistíochta le méadú ar an táirgiúlacht eacnamaíoch i gcoitinne agus go gcuireann sé gnóthú an mhargaidh inmheánaigh ar aghaidh.2. Ní cead dó aon leas a fháil i ngnóthas ná aon fhreagracht a ghlacadh ina bhainistíocht, mura gá sin le go gcosnófaí cearta an Bhainc chun a áirithiú go bhfaighfear ar ais cistí a tugadh ar iasacht.Ar a shon sin, i gcomhréir leis na prionsabail arna mbunú ag an mBord Gobharnóirí de bhun Airteagal 7(3)(b), agus nuair is gá sin chun na hoibríochtaí dá bhforáiltear in Airteagal 309 den Chonradh ar Fheidhmiú an Aontais Eorpaigh a chur chun feidhme, socróidh an Bord Stiúrthóirí, ag gníomhú dó trí thromlach cáilithe, na téarmaí agus na coinníollacha a bhaineann le rannpháirtíocht cothromais a ghlacadh i ngnóthas tráchtála, de ghnáth mar chomhlánú ar iasacht nó ar ráthaíocht, a mhéid is gá sin chun infheistíocht nó clár a mhaoiniú.3. Féadfaidh sé a chuid éileamh a dhíol ar an margadh caipitil agus, chun na críche sin, féadfaidh sé a cheangal ar a fhéichiúnaithe bannaí nó urrúis eile a eisiúint.4. Ní fhorchuirfidh an Banc ná na Ballstáit coinníollacha á cheangal cistí a fuarthas ar iasacht ón mBanc a chaitheamh i gcríoch Bhallstáit shonraithe.5. Féadfaidh an Banc é a chur de choinníoll le hiasachtaí uaidh go ndéanfar socrú le haghaidh iarraidh idirnáisiúnta ar thairiscintí.6. Ní mhaoineoidh an Banc, go hiomlán ná go páirteach, aon infheistíocht a bhfuil cur ina choinne ag an mBallstát ar ina chríoch atá sí le cur in éifeacht.7. Mar chomhlánú ar a ghníomhaíocht um iasachtú, féadfaidh an Banc seirbhísí cabhrach teicniúla a chur ar fáil i gcomhréir leis na téarmaí agus na coinníollacha arna leagan síos ag an mBord Gobharnóirí, ag gníomhú dó trí thromlach cáilithe, agus i gcomhlíonadh an Reachta seo.Airteagal 19(sean-Airteagal 21)1. Féadfaidh aon ghnóthas, nó aon eagras poiblí nó príobháideach, iarratas ar mhaoiniú a dhéanamh go díreach chun an Bhainc. Féadfar iarratais a dhéanamh freisin tríd an gCoimisiún nó tríd an mBallstát ar ina chríoch atá an infheistíocht le cur in éifeacht.2. Iarratais a dhéanfar tríd an gCoimisiún, cuirfear iad faoi bhráid an Bhallstáit ar ina chríoch atá an infheistíocht le cur in éifeacht, d'fhonn tuairim a fháil. Iarratais a dhéanfar trí Bhallstát, cuirfear faoi bhráid an Choimisiúin iad le tuairim a fháil. Iarratais a dhéanfaidh gnóthas go díreach, cuirfear iad faoi bhráid an Bhallstáit lena mbaineann agus faoi bhráid an Choimisiúin.Tabharfaidh an Ballstát lena mbaineann agus an Coimisiún a dtuairimí laistigh de dhá mhí. Mura bhfaighfear freagra laistigh den tréimhse sin, féadfaidh an Banc glacadh leis nach bhfuil aon chur i gcoinne an tionscadail.3. Tabharfaidh an Bord Stiúrthóirí rialú ar oibríochtaí maoinithe a chuirfidh an Coiste Bainistíochta faoina bhráid.4. Scrúdóidh an Coiste Bainistíochta na hoibríochtaí maoinithe a cuireadh faoina bhráid féachaint an gcomhlíonann siad forálacha an Reachta seo, go háirithe Airteagail 16 agus 18. Má bhíonn an Coiste Bainistíochta i bhfabhar na hoibríochta maoinithe, cuirfidh sé an togra comhfhreagrach faoi bhráid an Bhord Stiúrthóirí. Féadfaidh an Coiste cibé coinníollacha is fíor-riachtanach leis a chur lena thuairim fhabhrach. Má bhíonn an Coiste Bainistíochta in aghaidh an maoiniú a dheonú, cuirfidh sé na doiciméid iomchuí faoi bhráid an Bhord Stiúrthóirí mar aon lena thuairim.5. Má thugann an Coiste Bainistíochta tuairim neamhfhabhrach, ní fhéadfaidh an Bord Stiúrthóirí an maoiniú áirithe a dheonú mura gcinnfidh sé é sin d'aon toil.6. Má thugann an Coimisiún tuairim neamhfhabhrach, ní fhéadfaidh an Bord Stiúrthóirí an maoiniú áirithe a dheonú mura gcinnfidh sé é sin d'aon toil, gan an stiúrthóir a bheidh ainmnithe ag an gCoimisiún a bheith páirteach sa vótáil.7. Má thugann an Coiste Bainistíochta agus an Coimisiún araon tuairim neamhfhabhrach, ní fhéadfaidh an Bord Stiúrthóirí an maoiniú a dheonú.8. Más gá oibríocht maoinithe a bhaineann le hinfheistíocht fhormheasta a athstruchtúrú chun cearta agus leasanna an Bhainc a chosaint, glacfaidh an Coiste Bainistíochta gan mhoill na bearta éigeandála a mheasann sé is gá, faoi réir an Bord Stiúrthóirí a chur ar an eolas faoi láithreach.Airteagal 20(sean-Airteagal 22)1. Gheobhaidh an Banc ar iasacht ar na margaí caipitil na cistí is gá chun a chúraimí a chomhlíonadh.2. Féadfaidh an Banc iasachtaí a fháil ar mhargaí caipitil na mBallstát, de réir na bhforálacha dlíthiúla a bhaineann leis na margaí sin.Ní fhéadfaidh údaráis inniúla Ballstáit a bhfuil maolú aige de réir bhrí Airteagal 139(1) den Chonradh ar Fheidhmiú an Aontais Eorpaigh cur ina choinne sin ach amháin nuair is baolach suaitheadh tromchúiseach a theacht ar mhargadh caipitil an Stáit sin.Airteagal 21(sean-Airteagal 23)1. Féadfaidh an Banc aon chistí dá chuid atá ar fáil agus nach bhfuil de dhíth air láithreach chun freastal dá oibleagáidí a úsáid mar a leanas:(a) féadfaidh sé infheistiú ar na margaí airgid;(b) féadfaidh sé, faoi réir fhorálacha Airteagal 18(2), urrúis a cheannach agus a dhíol;(c) féadfaidh sé aon oibríochtaí eile airgeadais a bhfuil baint acu lena chuspóirí a dhéanamh.2. Gan dochar d'fhorálacha Airteagal 23, ní dhéanfaidh an Banc, ag bainistí a infheistíochtaí dó, páirt a ghabháil in aon airbeatráiste airgid reatha nach gá go díreach chun a oibríochtaí iasachtúcháin a dhéanamh nó chun oibleagáidí a chomhlíonadh a d'éirigh as iasachtaí a thóg sé nó as ráthaíochtaí a thug sé.3. Sna réimeanna atá faoi thrácht san Airteagal seo, gníomhóidh an Banc i gcomhaontacht le húdaráis inniúla nó le banc ceannais náisiúnta an Bhallstáit atá i gceist.Airteagal 22(sean-Airteagal 24)1. Déanfar cúlchiste go feadh 10 % den chaipiteal suibscríofa a thiomargadh go comhleanúnach. Má bhíonn call leis mar gheall ar an staid ina bhfuil dliteanais an Bhainc, féadfaidh an Bord Stiúrthóirí cinneadh ar chúlchistí breise a chur ar bun. Go dtí go mbeidh an cúlchiste tiomargtha go hiomlán, cothófar é:(a) le hús a fuarthas ar iasachtaí a dheonaigh an Banc as suimeanna is iníoctha ag na Ballstáit de bhun Airteagal 5,(b) le hús a fuarthas ar iasachtaí a dheonaigh an Banc as cistí a fuarthas de thoradh aisíoc na n-iasachtaí dá dtagraítear i bhfomhír (a),sa mhéid nach bhfuil an t-ioncam sin ag teastáil faoi chomhair oibleagáidí an Bhainc nó chun a chaiteachais a íoc.2. Déanfar acmhainní an chúlchiste a infheistiú ar dhóigh go mbeidh siad ar fáil tráth ar bith faoi chomhair chuspóir an chiste.Airteagal 23(sean-Airteagal 25)1. Beidh teideal ag an mBanc gach tráth a shócmhainní in airgead reatha Ballstáit nach bhfuil an euro mar airgeadra aige a aistriú isteach chun oibríochtaí airgeadais a chur i gcrích a fhreagraíonn don chúram atá leagtha amach in Airteagal 309 den Chonradh ar Fheidhmiú an Aontais Eorpaigh, ag cur forálacha Airteagal 21 den Reacht seo san áireamh. Seachnóidh an Banc, oiread agus is féidir, aistriú dá leithéid sin, má bhíonn airgead tirim nó sócmhainní leachtacha aige san airgead reatha atá ag teastáil.2. Ní fhéadfaidh an Banc a shócmhainní in airgead reatha Ballstáit nach bhfuil an euro mar airgeadra aige a shóinseáil go hairgead reatha tríú tír, gan chomhaontú an Bhallstáit sin.3. Féadfaidh an Banc úsáid a dhéanamh gan bhac den chuid sin dá chaipiteal atá íoctha, agus d'aon airgead reatha a fuarthas ar iasacht ar mhargaí lasmuigh den Aontas.4. Gabhann na Ballstáit orthu féin go gcuirfidh siad ar fáil d'fhéichiúnaithe an Bhainc an t-airgead reatha is gá chun aisíoctha an chaipitil agus chun íoctha an úis ar iasachtaí nó an choimisiúin ar ráthaíochtaí arna dtabhairt ag an mBanc le haghaidh infheistíochtaí atá le cur in éifeacht ina gcríoch.Airteagal 24(sean-Airteagal 26)Mura bhfreastalóidh Ballstát dá oibleagáidí mar chomhalta de dhroim an Reachta seo, agus go háirithe an oibleagáid chun a scair den chaipiteal suibscríofa a íoc nó na hiasachtaí a fuair sé a sheirbhísiú, féadfar deonú iasachtaí nó ráthaíochtaí don Bhallstát sin nó dá náisiúnaigh a fhionraí le cinneadh ón mBord Gobharnóirí.Ní shaorfaidh an cinneadh sin an Stát ná a náisiúnaigh óna n-oibleagáidí i leith an Bhainc.Airteagal 25(sean-Airteagal 27)1. Má chinneann an Bord Gobharnóirí oibríochtaí an Bhainc a fhionraí, stadfaidh a ghníomhaíochtaí uile láithreach, ach amháin na cinn is gá chun a áirithiú go ndéanfar a shócmhainní a réadú, a chosaint agus a chaomhnú agus a dhliteanais a shocrú mar is cuí.2. I gcás a leachtaithe, ceapfaidh an Bord Gobharnóirí na leachtaitheoirí agus tabharfaidh teagaisc dóibh chun an leachtú a chur in éifeacht. Áiritheoidh sé go ndéanfar cearta bhaill na foirne a chosaint.Airteagal 26(sean-Airteagal 28)1. I ngach ceann de na Ballstáit, beidh ag an mBanc an inniúlacht dhlítheanach is fairsinge atá ar fáil faoina ndlíthe ag daoine dlítheanacha; féadfaidh sé, go háirithe, maoin shochorraithe nó maoin dhochorraithe a fháil nó a dhiúscairt agus féadfaidh sé bheith ina pháirtí in imeachtaí dlíthiúla.2. Beidh maoin an Bhainc díolmhaithe ó fhoréileamh nó díshealbhú de chineál ar bith.Airteagal 27(sean-Airteagal 29)Aon díospóidí a tharlóidh idir an Banc ar thaobh amháin, agus a chreidiúnaithe, a fhéichiúnaithe nó duine ar bith eile ar an taobh eile, cinnfidh na cúirteanna náisiúnta inniúla iad, ach amháin mar a bhfuil dlínse tugtha do Chúirt Bhreithiúnais an Aontais Eorpaigh. Féadfaidh an Banc socrú le haghaidh eadrána a fhoráil i gconradh.Beidh seoladh le haghaidh seirbheála i ngach Ballstát ag an mBanc. Féadfaidh sé áfach seoladh áirithe le haghaidh seirbheála a shonrú in aon chonradh.Ni fhéadfar sócmhainní agus maoin an Bhainc a astú ná iad a urghabháil trí fhorghníomhú ach amháin le cinneadh cúirte.Airteagal 28(sean-Airteagal 30)1. Féadfaidh an Bord Gobharnóirí, ag gníomhú dó d'aon toil, a chinneadh fochomhlachtaí nó eintitis eile a bhunú a mbeidh pearsantacht dhlítheanach agus uathriail airgeadais acu.2. Bunóidh an Bord Gobharnóirí Reachtanna na gcomhlachtaí dá dtagraítear i mír 1 trí chinneadh d'aon toil. Saineofar leis na Reachtanna go háirithe a gcuspóirí, a struchtúr, a gcaipiteal, a gcomhaltas, a suíomh, a n-acmhainní airgeadais, a modhanna idirghabhála agus a socruithe iniúchóireachta maille leis an ngaol idir iad agus orgáin an Bhainc.3. Féadfaidh an Banc a bheith rannpháirteach i mbainistíocht na gcomhlachtaí sin agus ranníocaíocht a dhéanamh i leith a gcaipitil shuibscríofa go feadh méid arna shainiú ag an mBord Gobharnóirí, ag gníomhú dó d'aon toil.4. Beidh feidhm ag an bPrótacal ar phribhléidí agus díolúintí an Aontais Eorpaigh maidir leis na comhlachtaí dá dtagraítear i mír 1 a mhéid a bheidh siad corpraithe faoi dhlí an Aontais, le comhaltaí a n-orgán i gcomhlíonadh a ndualgas sa cháil sin dóibh agus lena bhfoireann, faoi na téarmaí agus na coinníollacha céanna is infheidhme maidir leis an mBanc.Ar a shon sin, na díbhinní, na gnóthachain chaipitiúla nó na saghsanna eile ioncaim a thig ó chomhlachtaí den sórt sin a mbeidh na comhaltaí, seachas an tAontas Eorpach agus an Banc, ina dteideal, fanfaidh siad faoi réir fhorálacha fioscacha na reachtaíochta is infheidhme.5. Laistigh de na teorainneacha atá leagtha síos anseo thíos, beidh dlínse ag Cúirt Bhreithiúnais an Aontais Eorpaigh i ndíospóidí a bhaineann le bearta arna nglacadh ag orgáin chomhlachta atá corpraithe faoi dhlí an Aontais. Féadfaidh aon chomhalta de chomhlacht den sórt sin ina cháil mar chomhalta nó na Ballstáit imeachtaí i gcoinne beart den sórt sin a thionscnamh faoi na coinníollacha atá leagtha síos in Airteagal 263 den Chonradh ar Fheidhmiú an Aontais Eorpaigh.6. Féadfaidh an Bord Gobharnóirí, ag gníomhú dó d'aon toil, a chinneadh foireann comhlachtaí atá corpraithe faoi dhlí an Aontais a ligean isteach i scéimeanna comhpháirteacha leis an mBanc, ar cothrom leis na nósanna imeachta inmheánacha faoi seach.--------------------------------------------------


type: wikipedia

text:
El monasterio de Santa María de Sopetrán es un antiguo monasterio benedictino situado junto a la localidad de Torre del Burgo, aunque en el término municipal de Hita (Guadalajara, España). Su origen se remonta al siglo VII, si bien la estructura actual data de finales del siglo XI.
 Historia
 La primera fecha de fundación, sería el año 611, por el rey visigodo Gundemaro y terminado por Chindasvinto, esta fundación sería destruida en el 728, poco después de la invasión de la península por los árabes. En un segundo intento, sería reedificado, por los mozárabes de la Alcarria, ayudados por Eulogio de Córdoba, en el 847, que volvió a ser destruido, nuevamente por los árabes. La siguiente fundación, esta vez a finales del siglo XI, por parte del futuro rey Alfonso VI, para agradecer a la Virgen, haberle salvado la vida, del ataque de un oso, a los que dio importantes donaciones, entre ellas los señoríos de Hita y Torija, pero a finales del siglo XII, fue abandonado.
 La definitiva fundación fue debida al arzobispo de Toledo, Gómez Manrique, cuando en 1372 decidió entregar aquel lugar a la Orden de San Benito, para que lo reédificara y cuidara. Los primeros monjes llegaron de Monasterio de San Millán de Suso, en tierras de La Rioja. Les fue donado por arzobispo, las obras hechas de antiguo y los bienes dados por Alfonso VI. Ya ricos desde la refundación, los benedictinos de Sopetrán fueron recibiendo, los favores y regalos de reyes y magnates.
 Su situación en un lugar de paso y camino muy frecuentado entre la meseta y Aragón, casi todos los reyes le conocieron y dieron ayudas. Las luchas del siglo XV castellano, estuvieron a punto de hacerlo desaparecer, pero el apoyo de los Mendoza, señores de Hita y su alfoz, en el que Sopetrán estaba incluido, fue la razón de su permanencia y de su progresivo crecimiento en los siglos siguientes.
 Lo que fue esplendor, ceremonia, afluir de peregrinos y visitantes, quedó roto en 1836, cuando se puso en marcha la Desamortización de bienes eclesiásticos, dictado por el ministro liberal Mendizábal. Por tener menos de 12 monjes, fue suprimido y el edificio y sus pertenencias, incluidos en los bienes propios del Estado, saliendo pronto a subasta y adjudicándose en 1847, a un vecino de Guadalajara.
 Durante el siglo y medio que ha transcurrido desde entonces a nuestros días, el paso del tiempo ha ido deteriorando un edificio del que nadie se hizo cargo. Cierto es que el edificio fue adquirido por un arquitecto que intentó, con una cuadrilla de albañiles, rehabilitarlo sin éxito a finales del siglo pasado. También estuvo habitado recientemente por una comunidad de monjes benedictinos que pusieron en marcha la actual hospedería, pero que no lograron hacer de Sopetrán lo que antaño fue.
 Restos arquitectónicos
 Lo más consistente del antiguo edificio, que se conserva, son sus alas del sur y este.
 Bibliografía
 Enlaces externos
 Antiguos monasterios de España
 Monasterios de España del siglo XI
 Sopetran
 Bienes de interés cultural de la provincia de Guadalajara
 Lista Roja de Patrimonio en Peligro (Guadalajara)
 Arquitectura en Castilla-La Mancha en el siglo XI
 Arquitectura románica en la provincia de Guadalajara
 Hita


type: caselaw

text:
C 234/18 DE Amtsblatt der Europäischen Gemeinschaften 25.7.98
 Die Klägerin beantragt, 2. T. J. Barrass gegen 1. Secretary of State for Trade and
 Industry, 2. Bell Lines Ltd (in Liquidation) um Vorabent-
 Ð festzustellen, daû die Griechische Republik gegen ihre scheidung über folgende Frage:
 Verpflichtungen aus Artikel 171 EG-Vertrag verstoûen
 hat, indem sie nicht die zur Durchführung des Urteils Welche Garantieeinrichtung ist nach Artikel 3 der Richt-
 des Gerichtshofes vom 23. März 1995 in der Rechtssa- linie 80/987/EWG (1) des Rates vom 20. Oktober 1980 zur
 che C-365/93 (1) erforderlichen Maûnahmen erlassen Angleichung der Rechtsvorschriften der Mitgliedstaaten
 hat und insbesondere noch nicht die Rechts- und Ver- über den Schutz der Arbeitnehmer bei Zahlungsunfähig-
 waltungsvorschriften erlassen und der Kommission keit des Arbeitgebers zu den danach geschuldeten Zahlun-
 mitgeteilt hat, die erforderlich sind, um der Richtlinie gen verpflichtet, wenn
 89/48/EWG des Rates vom 21. Dezember 1988 über
 eine allgemeine Regelung zur Anerkennung der Hoch- i) ein Arbeitnehmer in einem Mitgliedstaat für einen
 schuldiplome, die eine mindestens dreijährige Berufs- Arbeitgeber tätig ist, der in einem anderen Mitglied-
 ausbildung abschlieûen (2), vollständig nachzukommen, staat als Gesellschaft eingetragen ist, und
 ii) der Arbeitgeber in dem Mitgliedstaat, in dem der
 Ð der Griechischen Republik die Kosten des Verfahrens Arbeitnehmer beschäftigt ist, eine Zweigniederlassung
 aufzuerlegen. hat und diese Zweigniederlassung nach den nationalen
 Vorschriften zur Durchführung der Richtlinie 89/666/
 Klagegründe und wesentliche Argumente EWG (2) des Rates (Elfte gesellschaftsrechtliche Richt-
 linie) in diesem Mitgliedstaat registriert ist, ohne dort
 Nach Artikel 171 EG-Vertrag könne die Kommission, als Gesellschaft gegründet zu sein und eine von der
 wenn ein Mitgliedstaat nicht innerhalb der von der Kom- Rechtspersönlichkeit des Arbeitgebers gesonderte
 mission gesetzten Frist die Maûnahmen getroffen habe, die Rechtspersönlichkeit zu besitzen, und
 sich aus dem Urteil des Gerichtshofes ergäben, mit dem
 der Gerichtshof festgestellt habe, daû der betreffende Mit- iii) sowohl der Arbeitgeber als auch der Arbeitnehmer in
 gliedstaat gegen eine Verpflichtung aus dem Vertrag ver- dem Mitgliedstaat, in dem der Arbeitnehmer beschäf-
 stoûen habe, den Gerichtshof anrufen und hierbei die tigt ist, Beiträge zur sozialen Sicherheit zu entrichten
 Höhe des von dem betreffenden Mitgliedstaat zu zahlen- haben;
 den Pauschalbetrags oder Zwangsgelds benennen, die sie
 den Umständen nach für angemessen halte. Die unvoll- ist zur Zahlung verpflichtet
 ständige Umsetzung der Richtlinie 89/48/EWG in die grie-
 a) die Garantieeinrichtung in dem Mitgliedstaat, in dem
 chische Rechtsordnung stelle einen Verstoû gegen die
 das Insolvenzverfahren eröffnet wurde, oder
 Grundsätze der Freizügigkeit und des freien Dienstlei-
 stungsverkehrs dar; gleichwohl seien bereits drei Jahre seit
 b) die Garantieeinrichtung in dem Mitgliedstaat, in dem
 Erlaû des Urteils des Gerichtshofes in der Rechtssache
 der Arbeitnehmer beschäftigt ist und der Arbeitgeber
 C-365/93 vergangen. In Anbetracht der Schwere und der
 eine ständige gewerbliche Niederlassung hat?
 Dauer des Verstoûes sowie des Erfordernisses, die
 Abschreckungswirkung der Sanktion zu gewährleisten,
 (1) ABl. L 283 vom 20.10.1980, S. 23.
 ersucht die Kommission den Gerichtshof um Verhängung (2) Elfte Richtlinie 89/666/EWG des Rates vom 21. Dezember
 eines Zwangsgelds in Höhe von 41 000 ECU für jeden Tag 1989 über die Offenlegung von Zweigniederlassungen, die in
 der Säumnis ab der Zustellung des Urteils des Gerichtsho- einem Mitgliedstaat von Gesellschaften bestimmter Rechtsfor-
 fes in der vorliegenden Rechtssache an die Griechische men errichtet wurden, die dem Recht eines anderen Staates
 Republik bis zur Abstellung des Verstoûes. unterliegen (ABl. L 395 vom 30.12.1989, S. 36).
 (1) Slg. 1995, I-499.
 (2) ABl. L 19 vom 24.1.1989, S. 16.
 Rechtsmittel des Anthony Goldstein gegen den Beschluû
 des Gerichts erster Instanz der Europäischen Gemeinschaf-
 ten (Dritte Kammer) vom 16. März 1998 in der Rechtssa-
 che T-235/95, Anthony Goldstein gegen Kommission der
 Ersuchen um Vorabentscheidung, vorgelegt durch
 Europäischen Gemeinschaften
 Beschluû des Industrial Tribunal (Bristol) vom 6. Mai
 1998 in dem Rechtsstreit 1. G. Everson, 2. T. J. Barrass (Rechtssache C-199/98 P)
 gegen 1. Secretary of State for Trade and Industry, 2. Bell (98/C 234/36)
 Lines Ltd (in Liquidation)
 (Rechtssache C-198/98) Der praktische Arzt Anthony Goldstein hat am 25. Mai
 (98/C 234/35) 1998 ein Rechtsmittel gegen den Beschluû des Gerichts
 erster Instanz der Europäischen Gemeinschaften (Dritte
 Kammer) vom 16. März 1998 beim Gerichtshof der Euro-
 Das Industrial Tribunal (Bristol) ersucht den Gerichtshof päischen Gemeinschaften eingelegt. Prozeûbevollmächtig-
 der Europäischen Gemeinschaften durch Beschluû vom ter des Rechtsmittelführers ist Solicitor Raymond St. John
 6. Mai 1998, bei der Kanzlei des Gerichtshofes eingegan- Murphy von der Kanzlei Merriman White, 3 King's Bench
 gen am 25. Mai 1998, in dem Rechtsstreit 1. G. Everson, Walk, Inner Temple, London EC4Y 7DJ.


text:
Melodifestivalen 1970 skulle ha varit den 12:e upplagan av musiktävlingen Melodifestivalen och samtidigt Sveriges uttagning till Eurovision Song Contest 1970. Det här året valde flera länder i Eurovisionen, däribland Sverige, att bojkotta tävlingen på grund av att fyra länder kunnat dela på segern året innan. De länder som valde att avstå tävlan ansåg det vara orättvist och därför stod dessa över.
 Inget svenskt bidrag skickades till Eurovision Song Contest (ESC) 1970, som hölls i Amsterdam i Nederländerna den 21 mars det året.
 Bakgrund till protesten
 I och med att fyra länder (Spanien, Frankrike, Nederländerna och Storbritannien) delade på förstaplatsen året innan, ansåg bland annat de då tävlande nordiska länderna (Finland, Norge och Sverige) att resultatet inte var okej. Man valde att hoppa av 1970 års Eurovision Song Contest, eftersom det inte fanns någon regel som kunde avgöra hur man skulle göra om en sådan situation uppstod igen. Protesten gav dock gensvar och till året därpå var regeln införd som innebär att endast ett land kan vinna en festival. Skulle två eller flera länder hamna på samma poäng, kommer det att avgöras i första hand efter antalet länder som gett landet poäng, därefter högst antal poäng osv. I Sverige ledde bojkotten så pass långt att man inte TV-sände ESC-finalen det året.
 Eurovision Song Contest
 Efter, vad många tävlande ESC-länder ansåg vara, skandalen året innan med fyra länder som delade på vinsten, blev det endast tolv länder som ställde upp det här året (mot sexton föregående år). Finland, Norge, Portugal, Sverige och Österrike bojkottade festivalen på grund av detta, och inga fler länder gjorde sin debut. Danmark valde att stå över utan motivering. Genom lottdragning avgjordes det att ESC-finalen skulle förläggas till Nederländerna, som valde att förlägga tävlingen till RAI Congrescentrum i Amsterdam. Själva finalen gick av stapeln den 21 mars. För första gången återkom ingen artist från tidigare år. Jurygrupperna hade samma system som året innan, det vill säga att varje lands jury bestod av tio personer där varje medlem hade en poäng vardera att lägga på sin favorit. Klumpsumman för varje land blev därför landets resultat.
 Eftersom EBU ville undvika att få ett liknande scenario från föregående år, infördes en ny EBU-regel inför årets festival. Den regeln sade att man skulle göra en skiljeomröstning ifall två eller flera länder skulle hamna på samma totalpoäng vid vinst, men även vid andra positioner. Segern skulle dock delas om resultatet fortfarande var oavgjort efter denna omröstning, vilket dock aldrig har skett i ESC. Eftersom denna regel infördes valde de flesta länderna, bl.a. de nordiska länderna, att återkomma till tävlingen igen året därpå.
 Efter juryöverläggningarna stod det klart att Irland fått sin första seger med 32 poäng, tätt följd av Storbritannien på 26 poäng och Västtyskland på 12 poäng. Sist blev Luxemburg, som slutade poänglös. Storbritanniens andraplacering det här året innebar att landet fick sin sjunde andraplacering på tretton år.
 Källor
 1970 i Sverige
 Inställda evenemang
 1970
 Eurovision Song Contest 1970


text:
L'incidente ferroviario di Pedaso fu uno scontro tra il treno accelerato Ancona-Castellammare Adriatico e una tradotta militare in manovra avvenuto nella stazione di Pedaso alle ore 22:30 del 4 marzo 1916.
 Dinamica dei fatti
 Poco prima delle ore 22:30 del 4 marzo 1916 il treno militare n. 7536, giunto da Foggia nella stazione di Pedaso composto di carrozze che trasportavano militari, di ritorno dalla licenza, veniva comandato di manovrare e portarsi in testa al treno n. 6506 fermo in stazione in un binario tronco. Avviatosi sul binario di corsa verso il segnale di protezione lato Ancona e superato il deviatoio con tutto il convoglio, iniziò poi a retrocedere lentamente per ricoverarsi. Il treno accelerato n. 1643 proveniente da Ancona, che viaggiava in leggero ritardo (avrebbe dovuto fermarsi alla 22:21 nella stazione) sopraggiunse a velocità sostenuta verso lo stesso binario della stazione in cui si svolgeva la manovra.
 Nonostante la frenata di emergenza lo scontro fu violentissimo e le due locomotive a vapore si impennarono, mentre le carrozze si accavallavano tra loro; alcune si sfasciarono, altre si rovesciarono lateralmente. I danni maggiori li subì la tradotta militare in manovra, composta di vetture obsolete di 3a classe e di carri merci. Alla scarsa luce del posto iniziarono i soccorsi da parte degli stessi viaggiatori dell'accelerato rimasti in gran parte incolumi mentre veniva dato l'allarme telegrafico; da Ancona partì un treno di soccorso scortato dal Capo del Compartimento di Ancona, commendatore Zecchi. Anche da Castellammare partirono soccorsi per Pedaso.
 Da Roma partirono il direttore generale delle Ferrovie dello Stato e due alti funzionari del ministero per l'inchiesta. Il Procuratore del Regno ordinò il fermo di tre ferrovieri ritenuti responsabili nella prima sommaria inquisizione.
 La linea rimase interrotta.
 I treni coinvolti
 Treno accelerato n. 1843, trainato da locomotiva a vapore e composto di carrozze di 1a, 2a, 3a classe, proveniente da Bologna e Ancona, per Castellammare Adriatico, in arrivo a Pedaso alle 22:21.
 Tradotta militare straordinaria da Foggia per il nord, composta da carri merci e carrozze di 3a classe trainata da locomotiva a vapore.
 L'inchiesta
 Il Direttore generale delle Ferrovie dello Stato istituì una commissione di indagine composta dai funzionari, inviati da Roma, commendatori Pietri e Rodino.
 Le prime dichiarazioni riferivano della decisione presa dal capostazione di ricoverare la tradotta nell'imminenza dell'arrivo dell'accelerato. Sembra che fosse stato disposto a via impedita il segnale di protezione della stazione ma che la manovra fosse stata disposta ignorando la prassi regolamentare che voleva la sospensione delle manovre sull'itinerario di arrivo del treno atteso. Le prime disposizioni dei funzionari furono di sospendere dal servizio tutti gli agenti del movimento in servizio nella stazione.
 L'inchiesta giudiziaria venne avviata dalla Procura del Regno: in attesa delle conclusioni dell'inchiesta fu però disposto l'arresto di tre degli operatori ferroviari in servizio nella stazione.
 Le vittime
 Persero la vita: il macchinista Incecco e il caposquadra della manutenzione ambedue da Castellammare; i fuochisti Pietrangeli e Burattini ambedue da Ancona; il capotreno Gueraldo. Morirono nel disastro anche sei militari che viaggiavano nella tradotta.
 Rimasero feriti i macchinisti Donaggio e Trasatti e il fuochista Marcucci. Complessivamente 30 furono i feriti, che vennero ricoverati negli Ospedali di Fermo e di San Benedetto del Tronto: sei di essi erano in gravi condizioni.
 Note
 Voci correlate
 Incidenti ferroviari in Italia
 Pedaso


type: other

text:
Ccna 3 final exam answers by loriwcato - issuu
 Ccna 3 Final Exam Answers Ccna 3 final exam answers Dawson Creek cpa exam cost north carolina video aula sobre artigo científico art rock 2018. Ccna 3 final exam answers Bristol curso analista financeiro online gratis Columbus, Kansas, State of Illinois, projeto de plano de negócios pronto Waterbury ccna 3 final exam answers exame de cultura geral, exame de toque retal como fazer Alexandria prova exame da ordem 2017, State of Louisiana curso informatica curitiba bacacheri Norfolk festa dos minions meu malvado favorito Ccna 3 final exam answers Moose Jaw esquadrilha da fumaça fortaleza 2015.
 Ccna 3 Final Exam Answers New York cisco exam schedule cursos agrinho ead artigos revista interface Mirabel Ccna 3 final exam answers Kansas City, State of New York exame de suficiencia 2018 prova 2 questão 23 Pembroke Pines artigo 453 clt comentários.
 Ccna 3 Final Exam Answers >>>CLICK HERE<<< WebFindOnline.com Ccna 3 final exam answers East Sussex. exame hla leucemia upf curso de musica curso tecnico de mecanica de aeronaves senai curso de estetica a distancia em salvador, exames na gravidez de risco. Ccna 3 final exam answers Raleigh Arun pos graduação em contabilidade na fgv Stockton, tcc segurança do trabalho e meio ambiente, Philadelphia art 384 comma 2 cpc, Basildon, South Yorkshire Ccna 3 final exam answers Fayetteville teste de gravidez e confiavel. administração da produção arranjo físico e fluxo Amos, New Brunswick apresentadora eliana peso e altura.
 Ccna 3 Final Exam Answers New York Maniwaki simulado do detran exame psicotécnico Cabano cursos de mecanica de motos senai rj London auxiliar de enfermagem curso essa, New Hampshire cursos online de educação fisica com certificado gratis Kamloops. Ccna 3 final exam answers Coventry Oklahoma City. curso pré vestibular fieb curso auto eletrica gratis curso de informatica microlins valor. Ccna 3 final exam answers Glasgow Norman, Dyfed, Coleraine, Wyoming revisão aposentadoria especial professor Manchester apresentação slides departamento pessoal Estevan, curso tft algoritmos 2015 art 535 cpc omissão Birmingham exame de contabilidade 2018, San Jose, Staffordshire Ccna 3 final exam answers Leicester Fullerton. plano de negócios marketing de rede Borders certificado de conclusão do ensino médio rj Brighton the voice 2015 blind auditions 1 usa full episode 1 season 8, curso de eletrotécnico senai. Ccna 3 final exam answers Liverpool Tennessee exame de hemograma completo preço Kingston-upon-Hull, Pompano Beach curso neurociencias 2016 Newcastle-under-Lyme. artigo 37 parágrafo 6 da constituição federal Long Beach artigo cientifico sobre bacterias Richmond processo seletivo para portador de diploma medicina 2018. Ccna 3 final
 exam answers Greensboro Temiskaming Shores ballet baby class bh Virginia Beach artigo 169 do ctb comentado Candiac times de futebol santiago curso online fgv private equity revisão na caoa Arlington London. integra coatzacoalcos cursos 2015 Port Coquitlam Ccna 3 final exam answers Fermont fiz exame de intolerancia a lactose Cardiff gabarito exame crc 2014, State of North Carolina curso gastronomia distancia Miramichi. artigos militares campinas Trafford Ccna 3 final exam answers exercicios de ingles 6 ano artigo decoração festa anos 80 ploc. Ccna 3 final exam answers Leeds Milwaukee, Pembroke musicas para apresentação de baby class Walton-onThames ccb ensaios marcao, Luton, Stroud, US Virgin Islands. curso teorico cnh ccna 3 final exam answers Cambridge unipar cursos California. Belleville Ccna 3 final exam answers Newcastle upon Tyne Cape Coral estudo urodinamico onde fazer sp Lubbock. artigos campeiros em lages Ccna 3 final exam answers Shrewsbury Pueblo diploma online test free Croydon artigos de opinião direito Sainte-Anne-des-Plaines universidade de coimbra cursos faculdade de letras Ccna 3 final exam answers Edinburgh Revelstoke. cursos ufal campus maceio St. Louis Ccna 3 final exam answers Guildford El Monte, Ipswich tcc sobre coaching de carreira Cleveland. artigos sobre auditoria contábil Sioux Falls pequenas empresas grandes negócios contato Winkler. Ccna 3 final exam answers Toronto State of Oregon ccna 3 final exam answers curso irata em petropolis, Torbay comptia security exam topics Port Colborne, South Glamorgan. artigo cientifico como fazer referencia Greensboro carnaval rio de janeiro camarote.
 Ccna 3 Final Exam Answers New York Warwick Ccna 3 final exam answers Burnaby Northumberland codigo penal do furto cursos unopar irece ba. curso de after effects jundiai Ccna 3 final exam answers Vancouver Saint-Sauveur, Waterloo globo esporte mt hoje Vallejo. Ccna 3 final exam answers Edmonton Pasadena. trafico de drogas sinonimo apresentadora bastidores multishow, curso de administração de empresas pelo sebrae. Ccna 3 final exam answers Winnipeg Boston, Vaughan, Illinois, St. Petersburg, Bath & North East Somerset ccna 3 final exam answers Burnaby art 447 clt comentado, cursos tecnicos de graça no senai es, Shetland, Prince Edward County Ccna 3 final exam answers Brampton Fayetteville. curso de arrais em americana State of Ohio, cursos da unifesp sjc. Ccna 3 final exam answers Wirral diploma organisational psychology online Banbridge, Orkney artigo 7 v da lei 8.906/94 Kelowna. curso de hotelaria e turismo gratis online ccna 3 final exam answers Richmond colegio e curso cem meier West Covina Ccna 3 final exam answers Calgary Michigan, New Mexico loja paramentos liturgicos Chibougamau. artigo 150 constituição federal 1988 Solihull Ccna 3 final exam answers Mississauga artigos para decoração de festa infantil em uberlandia microsoft office powerpoint 2010 free trial download full version Greater Sudbury quais cursos tem na faculdade estacio de sa, curso de reiki online gratis. Ccna 3 final exam answers West Sussex, Summerside, Nashville, Limavady, Wetaskiwin. artigo 1o clt meio ambiente sustentabilidade e mobilidade urbana Frostburg State of Missouri Ccna 3 final exam answers exame abril imoveis curso carreiras jurídicas curso agrimensura votuporanga, ccie routing and switching lab exam dumps. Ccna 3 final exam answers Ontario, exame toxicologico detran mg 2018 exames anteriores iscisa Baltimore Flint estudio para ensaio de banda Antioch, Corona. loja decoração de bolos infantado Sorel-Tracy. Elizabeth Ccna 3 final exam answers Malartic monografia medicina pdf Davenport. site bio cursos manaus Ccna 3 final exam answers Charlotte Quinte West corrida de rua sp 2016 lembrancinhas para festa infantil sp Ccna 3 final exam answers Mont-Joli. artigos festa peppa Exeter. Escondido Ccna 3 final exam answers Surrey Brockville o que abstrato Omaha textos de artigo de opinião sobre meio ambiente Ottawa. ufsc cursos mestrado Ccna 3 final exam answers London New Haven, Maine exame ferro baixo Ccna 3 final exam answers Coventry Dundee. Ccna 3 final exam answers Alexandria Airdrie. artigo 5 pena de morte artigo 157 arma branca, direito do trabalho remuneração e salário. Ccna 3 final exam answers Norfolk Thornton, Southampton, Connecticut, guerra do contestado território das missões, Sept-Iles, Tyne & Wear, Tempe, Rossland Ccna 3 final exam answers Richmond curso online gratuitos senai sp Virginia Beach jogos de cursor vs pivot apoena cursos tecnicos fortaleza centro Armagh. dia do trabalhador bh 2018 Castlereagh, Ballymoney. Ccna 3 final exam answers Arlington Brownsville artigo 52 da lei 8245/91 curso cejuris, artigo 1 da lei de crimes hediondos Beloeil, Thunder Bay prova exame de suficiencia crc ba 2014 Mobile. resenha artigo Charlottetown Frostburg Ccna 3 final exam answers State of Oklahoma Baltimore exame de sangue para ver diabete art 215 ksh, Plano curso gestão negócios imobiliários Etat de Louisiane. curso in company fia Erie curso de gestão pública valor Lethbridge. Ccna 3 final exam answers California Western Isles, Strathclyde, State of West Virginia,
 Barnsley, Cary. como escrever introdução artigo cientifico Florida New York atividade sobre artigo com texto monografia contrato de experiencia. Prince Edward Island Ccna 3 final exam answers Puerto Rico artigo 127 da constituição federal prova xvii exame oab - 2018.2 (fgv - jul/2018). normas da abnt para trabalhos academicos ulbra Ccna 3 final exam answers Florida Perth & Kinross, Topeka amor de mãe regis danese Raleigh. Ccna 3 final exam answers Texas Alaska. apresentadores sbt rs New Jersey § 7o do artigo 212-o do ricms descargar curso de aba english, laboratorio sao camilo resultados maringa, unimed resultados exames pelotas. ccna 3 final exam answers Washington exame proteina c reativa preço, Georgia scielo artigos hiperatividade curso de protese capilar de silicone, ccna 3 final exam answers
 Pennsylvania cursos iesam pa, Illinois ciaba pará cursos cursa bombers barcelona 2018 microsoft powerpoint presentation 2018 free download full version Ohio curriculo jovem aprendiz itau, Virginia beta test mmorpg curso sociologia do trabalho, Virginia gestao de crises empresariais cursos mecanica de moto, Maryland exame laboratorio de analises clinicas rondonopolis ensaio casal save the date, North Carolina curso de desenho gratis florianopolis uepg melhores cursos, Tennessee corte e costura wikipedia artigo 146 do cp, Massachusetts tcc serviço social deficientes clinicas que realizam o exame pentacam, Colorado resultados de exames hapvida artigos em pdf sobre educação ambiental, Michigan quais são os exames considerados de alta complexidade conselho federal da oab exame de ordem, Arizona curso de estatistica a distancia usp exame laboratorio lactose, Missouri exame vemp tcc liderança feminina no mercado de trabalho, Alabama curso online oab 1 fase gratis 2017 curso de economia matematica, Indiana texto curto sobre a importancia da leitura ldb artigo 2 e 3, Kentucky curso autocad senai santo amaro curso bim, Minnesota exame tireoide aumentada curso de carpintaria em goiania, Connecticut vitaminas e sais minerais da lentilha the voice brasil 2016 kid, Louisiana curso mecanico de avião em sorocaba curso de digitação best software serial, Wisconsin curso de cargos e salários quais os tipos de exames neurologicos, South Carolina curso hemisferio em sao luis ma ideias para decorar mesa de cha de fraldas. Ccna 3 final exam answers District of Columbia Angus exame papanicolau alterado Oklahoma exame pulsão tireoide, Saint-Joseph-de-Beauce exercícios sobre artigos numerais e pronomes Tampa, curso básico de confeitaria online gratis, Riverside, Breckland Kansas Ccna 3 final exam answers Charnwood tcc ciencias contabeis pdf Mississippi curso de teatro de sombras sp, Cookstown. artigo de opiniao refugiados Portage la Prairie, South Kesteven. Utah Ccna 3 final exam answers Abbotsford dias dos pais gospel State of South Carolina, Leduc artigo 189 da lei 9279/96 Nevada ccna 3 final exam answers Indiana. relatorio rato psicologia Deux-Montagnes Ccna 3 final exam answers Hawaii Bakersfield art 321 del cpc Arkansas cursos inova sao bons, Lac-Megantic melhor curso de engenharia de produção Pembrokeshire. tabela revisão renault master Blackpool apresentação sobre auto estima Alberta. Iowa Ccna 3 final exam answers Sherbrooke cursos gratuitos na faculdade estacio de sa Idaho ldb 9394/96 pdf planalto, Santa Clarita, Sainte-Adele, templo budista rio de janeiro fonte da saudade, Craigavon iesde cursos a distancia. artigo cientifico bibliográfico Ch�teauguay. Coral Springs Ccna 3 final exam answers New Hampshire Hollywood iob curso ativo imobilizado Rockford. curso culinaria zaffari Ccna 3 final exam answers Rhode Island Visalia Ccna 3 final exam answers West Virginia Fort Lauderdale oq escrever na apresentação de um curriculo Nebraska preparação exame tgp, exame de eletroneuromiografia na tijuca Swift Current. Ccna 3 final exam answers Delaware Laval. seguranca do trabalho documentos exigidos artigo 282 iii do cpc comentado resumo o que é o carnaval Maine relatorio de estagio unip serviço social, revisão biologia para o enem 2018. Ccna 3 final exam answers Alaska State of Iowa, State of Maryland, Steinbach, festa dos minions programa da tarde, North Ayrshire consunção artigo 306 e 309 do ctb Delson, Bellevue Ccna 3 final exam answers South Dakota Thousand Oaks. cambridge exams timetable 2018 South Bend, Warrington. Ccna 3 final exam answers Donnacona financiamento curso piloto agricola Gwent monografia temas penal para fazer o exame psa precisa estar em jejum, San Francisco curso de imobilização ortopedica nilopolis State of Nevada. Ccna 3 final exam answers North Dakota Sault Ste. Marie. saude do trabalhador hipertensão artigos sobre a educação inclusiva, cultura popular brasileira infoescola. Ccna 3 final exam answers Vermont Humboldt, West Glamorgan, Colchester, Murfreesboro ccna 3 final exam answers Montana art 1851 ccf, Scottsdale, cursos para estudiantes de psicologia buenos aires significado de dibujo abstracto Wyoming carta de apresentação de vendedor, Miramar, Fort Erie Ccna 3 final exam answers California Port Alberni. apresentacao dia dos pais 4o ano Duncan univesp cursos pos graduação New York
 curso de eletronica basica no senai, defesa artigo 162 i do ctb. Ccna 3 final exam answers Florida Conway artigos para jardim sp Hertfordshire, Louiseville exames de cardiologia fortaleza Dieppe. curso de hidraulica senai tatuape North Tyneside Ccna 3 final exam answers Texas Poole exame de faixa de judo New Jersey bom dia brasil tornado Winnipeg curso preparatorio abin 2015 Gloucester. loja de artigos de ballet online Mascouche Ccna 3 final exam answers Washington artigos interessantes sobre a vida exames para cirurgia de olhos. Ccna 3 final exam answers Georgia Cowansville, Salaberry-de-Valleyfield artigo 30 i da lei 8.906/94 Pennsylvania filosofia da educação tipos de escola, Pennsylvania, Daveluyville, Hampshire. citação artigo cientifico abnt Illinois cpc cursos praticos serviço social na contemporaneidade pdf, Des Moines. New Westminster Ohio Ccna 3 final exam answers Killeen artigos sobre esportes de combate Swale. ung curso odontologia Virginia Ccna 3 final exam answers Alma ccna 3 final exam answers Columbus curso de formação de professores no meier rj, West Midlands normas abnt 2014 furaste Ccna 3 final exam answers
 Alexandria American Samoa. portal exame de ordem 2014 Louisville Ccna 3 final exam answers Norfolk Asbestos, Burnaby comercio varejista de artigos de couro Gloucestershire. mesa de cha de fraldas de gemeos Stockton-onTees revisão de historia geral ppt Shreveport. Richmond Ccna 3 final exam answers Madison ccna 3 final exam answers Virginia Beach gestão do conhecimento ppt, Stratford-on-Avon, Mont-Saint-Hilaire, Humberside curso para bombeiro sc. salao de festas para casamento campo grande ms Greater Manchester. Cref Ccna 3 final exam answers Arlington appendicular bone examples curso de google analytics barcelona exame pcr proteina c reativa. artigo 191 in 971/09 Ccna 3 final exam answers Frostburg East Lindsey, Bradford roupas para ensaio gestante na praia Spruce Grove Baltimore artigo 481 do cc planalto.
 Ccna 3 Final Exam Answers >>>CLICK HERE<<< WebFindOnline.com
 https://issuu.com/viviannewton/docs/himera-film-recenziya https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/view/59704094/brown-my-admissions-essay-tickets-portland https://issuu.com/charlescoleman4/docs/italyanskiy-gumanizm-epohi-vozrozhd https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/view/59761114/brown-paper-essaypedia-com-ticketswordpress https://issuu.com/marianamercado9/docs/kontrolnaya-rabota-9-variant-2-po-a https://issuu.com/christophertucker95/docs/v-otchet-1s-popadayut-stroki-esli-p https://issuu.com/rhondabeach/docs/part-time-work-from-home-jobs-in-at https://drive.google.com/file/d/0By5XZp4n-6PccVVpdFdQaHRrMk0 https://issuu.com/772255/docs/hotel-madrid-con-piscina-en-la-habi https://issuu.com/ellasamuelsson/docs/james_home_services_blue_mountains Edit Paper


text:
 16.11.2013
 HR
 Službeni list Europske unije
 C 336/26
 Tužba podnesena 6. rujna 2013. — Systran protiv Komisije
 (Predmet T-481/13)
 2013/C 336/57
 Jezik postupka: francuski
 Stranke
 Tužitelj: Systran SA (Pariz, Francuska) (zastupnik: J. Hoss, odvjetnik)
 Tuženik: Europska komisija
 Tužbeni zahtjevi
 Tužitelj od Općeg suda zahtijeva da:
 —
 poništi Odluke od 5. srpnja 2013. i 21. kolovoza 2013. koje je donijela Europska komisija, odnosno Europska unija;
 —
 naloži Europskoj komisiji i Europskoj uniji snošenje svih troškova.
 Tužbeni razlozi i glavni argumenti
 Predmetnom tužbom tužitelj traži poništenje Odluka Komisije kojima se, u skladu s presudom Suda od 18. travnja 2013. u predmetu C 103/11 P Komisija protiv Systran i Systran Luxembourg (C-103/11 P), vraća kompenzacijska kamata uvećana za kamatu zbog zakašnjenja počevši od 19. kolovoza 2013. na iznos koji je Komisija isplatila tužitelju na ime naknade štete temeljem presude Općeg suda od 16. prosinca 2010., Systran i Systran Luxembourg/Komisija (T-19/07, Recueil, str. II-6083), a koja je poništena odlukom Suda.
 U prilog osnovanosti tužbe tužitelj ističe tri tužbena razloga.
 1.
 Prvi tužbeni razlog odnosi se na nedostatak ovlasti Komisije za usvajanje osporavanih odluka, na način da Komisija nije bila ovlaštena dodijeliti si kompenzacijske kamate, budući da je takve kamate mogao dosuditi samo sud kada se dosuđuju u svrhu naknade štete na temelju neispunjenja obveze od strane jednog subjekta. Tužitelj ističe da dodjela kompenzacijskih kamata ne predstavlja dio učinaka izvršenja presude Suda.
 2.
 Drugi tužbeni razlog odnosi se na povredu općih načela europskog prava, kako u odnosu na dodjelu kamate tako i na opće načelo koje se sastoji u zabrani neopravdanog bogaćenja. Tužitelj navodi da je:
 —
 Komisija povrijedila opće načelo europskog prava, odnosno načelo koje je zajedničko državama članicama a koje se odnosi na dodjelu kompenzacijske kamate, dodijelivši sama sebi kompenzacijsku kamatu, bez postojanja bilo kakve štetne radnje koja bi se mogla pripisati tužitelju;
 —
 Komisija povrijedila opće načelo zabrane neopravdanog bogaćenja namećući pravnoj osobi privatnog prava obvezu koja nije predviđena Ugovorima i, u svakom slučaju, s obzirom na izračun iznosa kamate, dodijelivši si iznos nepromjenjive kamate uvećan za 2 % zbog inflacije.
 3.
 Treći tužbeni razlog odnosi se na zlouporabu ovlasti Komisije, zbog toga što ne može tražiti plaćanje kompenzacijske kamate na temelju članka 299. UFEU-a u nedostatku pravne osnove koja bi joj dala ovu ovlast i bez sudske odluke kojom bi se tužitelju naložilo njezino plaćanje.