text:
MTV3 (puhekielessä usein Maikkari tai Kolmonen entinen Mainos-TV) on suomalainen kaupallinen televisiokanava. MTV3-kanavan ohjelmistosta vastaa MTV Oy. Vuonna 1993 MTV3 aloitti omana valtakunnallisena televisiokanavanaan. Tätä ennen MTV Oy oli välittänyt ohjelmia Ylen kanavilla TV1 ja TV2 sekä Kolmoskanavalla. MTV3:n digitaalijakelu aloitettiin digitelevision tulon myötä. MTV3 muuttui yleisen edun kanavaksi tammikuussa 2018 näkyen kanavanipussa A.
 Uudet toimitilat
 MTV:n vuokrasopimus päättyy Helsingin Ilmalassa vuoden 2022 lopussa, jolloin kanavan toimitilat siirtyvät Vallilan Konepajan alueelle NCC:ltä vuokrattaviin uusiin tiloihin.
 Uudet toimitilat luovutettiin MTV:n käyttöön 30. kesäkuuta 2022.
 Historiaa
 MTV perustettiin 1957 nimellä Oy Mainos-TV-Reklam Ab. Uusi yhtiö vuokrasi ohjelma-aikaa Yleisradion kanavalta, jonka ohjelmien lomassa se toimi. Kanavan ensimmäinen lähetys oli 13. elokuuta 1957. Alussa MTV:n viikoittainen ohjelma-aika oli vain kymmenen tuntia ja sekin parhaimman katseluajan ulkopuolella.
 MTV perusti vuonna 1965 oman televisioteatteritoimituksensa, MTV-teatterin. MTV-teatterin tuottamia televisioelokuvia esitettiin Aitiopaikka ja Teatterituokio -nimisillä ohjelmapaikoilla. Aitiopaikka-nimen alla esitettiin maanantai-iltaisin pitkiä, noin 90-minuuttisia televisionäytelmiä. Teatterituokio-nimellä kulkeneet näytelmät puolestaan olivat noin 45-minuutin pituisia. MTV-teatterin teatteripäälliköksi valittiin Ville Salminen. Ohjaajina toimivat Kaarlo Hiltunen, Veikko Kerttula, Ritva Nuutinen ja Pauli Virtanen. Lisäksi teatteriin palkattiin 12 näyttelijää.
 1960-luvun alussa MTV:n toiminta lähti nousuun. Vuonna 1967 rakennettiin Helsingin Ilmalaan uusi toimitalo, niin kutsuttu Pöllölaakso, johon myös kanavan hallinto, toimitus ja tuotantotilat sijoitettiin. Ylen asiapitoisen ohjelmiston täydentäjänä MTV suuntautui viihdeohjelmistoon.
 MTV aloitti omat uutislähetyksensä, Kymmenen uutiset, 1.9.1981 pitkien neuvottelujen jälkeen. Hanke oman uutistoimituksen perustamisesta oli aloitettu jo vuonna 1976, jolloin se esiteltiin poliittiselle päättäjille sekä Yleisradion hallintoneuvostolle. Vuonna 1979 valtioneuvosto asetti komitean laatimaan radio- ja televisiotoimintaa koskevan kokonaisselvityksen, joka päätyi ehdottamaan MTV:lle oikeutta kahden vuoden koeajaksi 15 minuutin mittaisten uutisten lähettämiseen. MTV kuitenkin kieltäytyi näistä ehdoista ja Yleisradio päätti lopulta vuonna 1981 myöntää MTV:lle oikeuden uutislähetyksiin. Vuonna 1990 MTV laajensi uutistoimintaansa aloittamalla Seitsemän uutiset.
 Nimi Mainostelevisio oli tarkoitettu alun perin vain väliaikaiseksi. Yhtiön nimi muutettiin lopulta MTV Oy:ksi vuonna 1982.
 Vuonna 1985 MTV Oy lähti Yleisradion ja Nokian kanssa Kolmostelevisio-projektiin. Kolmoskanava aloitti joulukuussa 1986. MTV sai uuden kanavan kautta lisää ohjelma-aikaa. Vuoden 1993 alusta MTV siirtyi kokonaan omalle kanavalleen ja alkoi lähettää ohjelmaa täyspäiväisesti. Uuden kanavan nimeksi tuli MTV3. Siitä tuli Suomen suosituin televisiokanava 43 prosentin katselijaosuudella.
 Tunnukset ja kanavailmeet
 MTV3:n nykyinen kanavailme sekä logo otettiin käyttöön 6. elokuuta 2019. Muutoksen myötä logon ympäriltä poistui ympyrä, ja tekstistä tehtiin tummempi.
 Logot
 Tunnukset
 Katsotuimmat TV-lähetykset vuonna 2020
 MTV3:n kuuluttajia
 Mika Jenytin, kanavan ensimmäinen mieskuuluttaja
 Irene Usvasalo, kuuluttaja vuosina 1983–1992
 Ritva Kajasto, kuuluttaja
 Arja Tuomarila, kuuluttaja
 Pirjo Nuotio, kuuluttaja
 Leena Kaskela, kuuluttaja ja uutisankkuri vuosina 1981–2004.
 Lähteet
 Viitteet
 Kirjallisuutta
 Aiheesta muualla
 Kannisto, Maiju: Kolmoskanavan merkitys suomalaisessa viestintäpolitiikassa. Kirja-arvostelu teoksesta Hellman, Heikki: Koko illan ilo? Kolmoskanava ja television kaupallistuminen Suomessa. SKS, 2012. (Agricolan kirja-arvosteluja, 25.5.2015.)
 Kannisto, Maiju: Ohjelmayhtiöstä ”merkintekijäksi”. MTV ja kaupallisen television tuotantokulttuurin muutos Suomessa 1980-luvulta 2000-luvulle (väitöskirja)
 MTV3:n virallinen sivusto
 Nostalgia-TV: MTV3:n tunnukset
 Nostalgia-TV: MTV:n tunnukset
 MTV uusien tilojen esittelyä
 Seulonnan keskeiset artikkelit


type: other

text:
Stämmoprotokoll 2003
 ALSJÖNS SAMFÄLLIGHETSFÖRENING PROTOKOLL
 Kl 19.00—22.05
 Klubbhuset, Stora Lundby Golfbana
 56 medlemmar, enligt röstlängd
 §1 Stämmans öppnande Ordföranden, Patrik Börjesson, hälsade medlemmarna välkomna till stämman, med kommentaren att detta måste vara rekord i antal närvarande vid stämman, samt förklarade mötet öppnat.
 §2 Val av ordförande för stämman Till stämmans ordförande valdes Patrik Börjesson, sittande.
 §3 Är kallelsen korrekt utsänd Kallelsen var korrekt utsänd.
 §4 Godkännande av föredragningslista Utsänd föredragningslista godkändes med justeringen att punkten 12 blir punkt 23 a.
 §5 Val av sekreterare
 för stämman
 Till sekreterare för stämman valdes Anne Lindberg.
 §6 Val av två justerare tillika rösträknare Diana Hansson och Jonathan Lundblad valdes till justeringsmän samt rösträknare.
 §7 Föregående stämmoprotokoll Sekreteraren läste upp protokollet som sedan godkändes av stämman.
 §8 Styrelsens förvaltningsberättelse Ordföranden läste upp förvaltningsberättelsen för verksamhetsåret 2003/2004. Förvaltningsberättelsen godkändes av stämman.
 Maijla Jäppinen, revisorsuppleanten, läste upp revisionsberättelsen för verksamhetsåret 2003/2004. Där revisorn, Ulla Hulthén, även föreslog ansvarsfrihet för styrelsen.
 Protokollsanteckning: Henry Andersson efterlyste balansräkning. En medlem föreslog att revisionsberättelse samt balansräkning bilägges kallelsen nästa år. Styrelsen följer detta förslag nästa år.
 §10 Ansvarsfrihet för styrelsen Stämman beviljade styrelsen ansvarsfrihet för det gångna verksamhetsåret.
 §11 Inkomna motioner Inga motioner har inkommit till stämman.
 §13 Styrelsens förslag till vinterväghållning
 Efter att frågan presenterades lämnades ordet fritt. Efter diskussion och frågor begärdes votering med andelstalsmetoden. Efter rösträkning blev utfallet ett bifall till styrelsens förslag. Kent Olofsson kommer att under tre år utföra snöröjning och halkbekämpning enligt anbud.
 §14 Styrelsens förslag till fortsatt asfaltering Efter att frågan presenterades lämnades ordet fritt. Efter diskussion beslutades att röstning skall ske genom huvudtalsröstning. Stämman röstade för styrelsens förslag.
 Protokollsanteckning: Henry Andersson yrkade på att fördela kostnaderna enligt andelstal. Detta förslag föll med bifallet till styrelsens förslag.
 §15 Styrelsens förslag till höjning av årsavgiften Frågan presenterades av ordföranden samt kassören. Ordet lämnades fritt. Efter diskussion beslutade stämman att bifalla styrelsens förslag till höjning av årsavgiften.
 §17 Sjörapport Sekreteraren, Anne Lindberg, redogjorde för hur våra sjöar mår, både ur bakteriell och övrig provtagnings synpunkt. Inventering av sjöarna presenterades. Åtgärd utifrån denna inventering presenterades. Kalkmängd presenterades. Vi kan sammanfattningsvis konstatera att sjöarna mår mycket bra.
 §16 Förslag till inkomst och utgiftsstat När röstsammanräkningen var klar kunde kassören, Thomas Jeryd, presentera förslag till inkomst- och utgiftsstat i enlighet med fattade beslut. En total intäkt på 318’890 kronor. En total beräknad kostnad på 306’100 kronor och ett väntat resultat på 12’790 kronor. Förslaget godkändes av stämman.
 §18 Val av två styrelseledamöter för två år Thomas Jeryd, omval, och Jonathan Lundblad, nyval, valdes till styrelseledamöter för två år.
 §19 Val av revisor för ett år Ulla Hulthén, omval, valdes till revisor för ett år.
 §20 Val av revisorsuppleant för ett år Till revisorsuppleant väljer stämman Diana Hansson, nyval, för ett år.
 §21 Val av valberedning för ett år Till valberedning väljs Ingela Carlbom, omval, och Yvonne Nilsson, nyval, för ett år.
 §22 Val av badkommitté för ett år
 Stämman beslutar enligt styrelsens förslag genom acklamation att badkommittén upplöses och att punkten utgår. Istället sammankallas föreningsmedlemmarna genom anslag på anslagstavlan och hemsidan för gemensamt arbete.
 §23 Val av vägkommitté för ett år
 Stämman väljer Harald Nilsson, nyval, Mikael Lindström, nyval, samt Susanne Falk, nyval och Markus Eriksson, nyval. Mikael Lindström är sammankallande.
 §23a Ersättning till styrelsen Ingvar föreslog en rejäl höjning av styrelsearvodet då mycket arbete utförs på fritid. När budgetförslaget godkänts av stämman fanns inte utrymme för höjning och stämman beslutade oförändrad ersättning.
 Ordföranden uppmanade föreningsmedlemmarna att motionera till stämman i större omfattning. Motionstidens utgång finns i stadgarna. Ett önskemål fanns att anslå om att tiden för motioner går ut.
 En medlem föreslog att prioriteringslistan finns på hemsidan.
 Ordföranden meddelade att blomlådor som gjorts av sekreteraren kommer att placeras ut som fartdämpande åtgärd på Alsjövägen.
 Patrik B informerade att slyröjning är planerad även i höst.
 Sekreteraren meddelade, efter det att frågan kom upp tidigare på mötet, att 1991 betalade helårsboende 750 kronor och fritidsboende 400 kronor i årsavgift.
 Frågan ställdes vad det är för typ av försäkring föreningen betalar för. Ordföranden berättade att det är en ansvars-/olycksfallsförsäkring i huvudsak avsedd för badplatsen eftersom densamma är privat och inte i Kommunens regi.
 Fråga om vem som ringer om det är träd som hotar elledningar och vi riskerar strömavbrott. Flygbesiktningar från elbolagen, inventering från Lerums Energi och varje medlems vakande öga samarbetar för ett fungerande elnät. Ring till Lerums Energi om träd hotar elledningar.
 Frågan ställdes: - Om man önskar dela upp betalningen då den är omfattande efter alla beslut? Tala med kassören.
 Då Ingvar slutar sina uppdrag i styrelsen tackades han av kassören, Thomas Jeryd, samt övriga föreningsmedlemmar med en blomma och ett hurra för sina insatser. Ingvar tackade för blommorna. Han var bland annat glad över att nya, unga krafter tar vid i styrelsearbetet.
 §25 Plats där stämmoproto-koll finnes På den nya anslagstavlan, hos ordföranden samt på Internet finns stämmoprotokollet.
 §26 Avslutning Ordföranden tackade alla som kommit för att delta i stämman samt önskade väl mött nästa år. Därmed förklarades mötet avslutat. Stämman tackade med applåder.
 Diana Hansson
 justerare Jonathan Lundblad


type: wikipedia

text:
A Zentai Tisza-híd (szerbül Senćanski most na Tisi; cirill írásmóddal: Сенћански мост на Тиси) egy közúti-vasúti híd Szerbia Vajdaság tartományában, amely Zenta mellett köti össze a Tiszától keletre fekvő bánáti régiót a folyótól nyugatra elterülő Bácskával.
 Zentai hidak
 Fahíd
 Zenta már a történelmi időkben is jelentős tiszai átkelőhely volt. Az első zentai ideiglenes hidat a törökök építették 1697-ben. Az első állandó folyami átkelőhelyre a 19. század folyamán erősödött meg az igény. A búzatermelő bánáti vidékeknek termékeik piacra juttatása érdekében egyre jobb közlekedési összeköttetésekre volt szükségük. Zenta város tanácsa már az 1850-es évek kezdetétől kezdve folyamatosan tárgyalt az állandó átkelőhely megépítéséről. A híd megvalósulása azonban elhúzódott, végül 1872-ben a város megbízást adott egy fából ácsolt híd felépítésére, kissé délre a mai átkelőhelytől. A Howe-féle faszerkezetű hidat alig egy év alatt építették fel, 1873. november 7-én került sor az átadására. Az úttörő létesítmény kiemelte Zentát a bácskai települések sorából, a város központi szerepkörre tett szert a híd által.
 „(A zentai hid-próba.) Zenta város tanácsa két év előtt elhatározta, hogy kereskedelmi viszonyainak könnyítésére hidat építtet a Tiszán, Hoowe amerikai rendszere szerint. Most már elkészült, s Denk miniszterialis mérnök megbizatása szerint Zentán megjelent, és a hidat erő és kitartási tekintetben kipróbálta, s azt az első és második hidoszlop közti ivezetet kivéve, mely a terhek súlya alatt nem egészen egy hüvelyket sülyedett, tökéletesen a czélra megfelelőnek találta. A kipróbáltatás ekként történt: hat hat-ökrös szekér, egyenként 400 darab téglával, hat kocsi pedig egyenként 200 darabbal lőn megrakva, s ivezetenként állíttattak a hidra, ezek egyenként a szekeren 40 mázsa teherre, a kocsik pedig 25 mázsára becsültettek, és igy összesen 390 mázsa. A teher a 200 mázsányi gőzszivattyuval együtt 590 mázsát tett ki a vonó állatokon és a hidra tolakodó néző közönségen kívül. A híd csak valamivel került kevesebbe 300,000 forintnál. E nagy összeg egy városra soknak látszik, de oly városnál, mint Zenta, mely az előhaladás utján áll, nem jöhet számításba, kivált ha meggondoljuk, hogy Zentának 20 ezernyi lakossága — ezek közt 18,000 jó munkás és meglehetősen művelt magyarság van, közös egyetértéssel a nagy eszmék felé tart. A híd nov. 5-én adatott át a forgalomnak.” (Vasárnapi Ujság, 1873. november 16.)
 A fából épült híd azonban gyorsan elhasználódott, az építmény lábával 1902. március 18-án egy szegedi hajó ütközött, az elkorhadt szerkezet a folyóba rogyott.
 Az első vashíd
 A hídomlást követően nem sokáig maradt Zenta Tisza-híd nélkül. Hamarosan Zsigmondi Béla és Tiszai Géza tervei alapján kezdték el megépíteni a város első vashídját. Az új híd számára két pillért építettek fel a Tisza medrében, amelyeken három alsópályás acél ívhíd nyugodott. Az új hidat 1908-ban helyezték forgalomba. Az első világháború idején az addig tisztán közúti hídra vasúti síneket fektettek. A híd 30 év múltán, 1938. június 9-én került a város kezeléséből az akkor már jugoszláv állam tulajdonába, ettől kezdve lehetett az átkelőt hídvám megfizetése nélkül használni. A város második hídja alig 33 éves működés után semmisült meg, 1941. április 12-én a kibontakozó német-magyar támadás elől menekülő jugoszláv hadsereg felrobbantotta. Az acélszerkezet leomlásakor megsérültek a pillérek is. Ezeket még a második világháború idején helyreállították, de az híd gyors felépítésére nem volt remény. A hídroncs északi oldalán hozzákezdtek egy pontonhíd felépítéséhez, de ez az átkelőhely sohasem valósult meg.
 A második vashíd
 A háború után csak egy komp járt a két part között. Az 1950-es évek végén a jugoszláv állam a híd újbóli felépítése mellett döntött. Az új hidat kettős, vasúti és közúti funkciók ellátására tervezték. A két forgalmi sáv mellett a híd északi oldalán egy vasúti sín is fut, amely a zentai és a csókai vasútállomást összekötő vasútvonal része. A hídlábakat kissé ki kellett szélesíteni az új felszerkezet számára. Maga az új híd rácsos szerkezetű acélhíd, legnagyobb nyílása 110 méter. A híd megtervezésében sorsdöntő szerepet játszott Gustave Eiffel akinek a nevéhez számos világhírű építmény tartozik. A fémszerkezetet a közép-szerbiai Smederevska Palankán gyártották, megnyitására 1962. november 27-én került sor. Jellegzetes halványsárga színével ma már a zentai Tisza-part elválaszthatatlan része.
 Jegyzetek
 Külső hivatkozások
 A Zentai Történeti Levéltár összeállítása
 Pejin Attila: A Tisza és Zenta
 Balassy Ildikó: Öröm és bánat forrása: a Tisza
 Tisza-hidak
 Vajdaság hídjai
 Zenta
 Vasúti hidak
 1962-ben átadott építmények


type: contracts

jurisdiction: EU

text:
 Důležité právní upozornění
 |
 22003D0136
 Úřední věstník L 331 , 18/12/2003 S. 0074 - 0075
 Rozhodnutí Smíšeného výboru EHPč. 136/2003ze dne 26. září 2003,kterým se mění příloha XXI (Statistika) Dohody o EHPSMÍŠENÝ VÝBOR EHP,s ohledem na Dohodu o Evropském hospodářském prostoru ve znění Protokolu o úpravě Dohody o Evropském hospodářském prostoru (dále jen "Dohoda"), a zejména s ohledem na článek 98 této dohody,vzhledem k těmto důvodům:(1) Příloha XXI Dohody byla změněna rozhodnutím Smíšeného výboru EHP č. 95/2003 ze dne 11. července 2003 [1].(2) Nařízení Komise (ES) č. 296/2003 ze dne 17. února 2003, kterým se mění nařízení Rady (EHS) č. 959/93 o statistických informacích poskytovaných členskými státy o rostlinných produktech s výjimkou obilovin [2], by mělo být začleněno do Dohody,ROZHODL TAKTO:Článek 1V bodě 24a (nařízení Rady (EHS) č. 959/93) přílohy XXI Dohody se doplňují slova:"ve znění:— 32003 R 0296: nařízení Komise (ES) č. 296/2003 ze dne 17. února 2003 (Úř. věst. L 43, 18.2.2003, s. 18)."Článek 2Znění nařízení (ES) č. 296/2003 v islandském a norském jazyce, která mají být zveřejněna v dodatku EHP Úředního věstníku Evropské unie, jsou platná.Článek 3Toto rozhodnutí vstupuje v platnost dnem 27. září 2003 za předpokladu, že Smíšenému výboru EHP jsou učiněna veškerá oznámení podle čl. 103 odst. 1 Dohody [3].Článek 4Toto rozhodnutí bude zveřejněno v oddíle EHP a v dodatku EHP Úředního věstníku Evropské unie.V Bruselu dne 26. září 2003.Za Smíšený výbor EHPpředsedaJ. K. J. Prinz Nikolaus von Liechtenstein[1] Úř. věst. L 272, 23.10.2003, s. 32.[2] Úř. věst. L 43, 18.2.2003, s. 18.[3] Nebyly oznámeny žádné ústavní požadavky.--------------------------------------------------


type: caselaw

jurisdiction: US

text:
 242 Md. 334 (1966)
 219 A.2d 80
 TEXACO, INC.
 v.
 VANDEN BOSCHE, ET AL.
 [No. 261, September Term, 1965.]
 Court of Appeals of Maryland.
 Decided April 27, 1966.
 The cause was argued before PRESCOTT, C.J., and HAMMOND, MARBURY, BARNES and McWILLIAMS, JJ., and CARTER, J., Chief Judge of the Second Judicial Circuit, specially assigned.
 James J. Cromwell, with whom were William G. Clark and Clark & Cromwell on the brief, for appellant.
 *336 Submitted on the brief by Robert A. Gingell, Lawrence E. Speelman and Ritterpusch & Gingell, for Albert B. Seitz, III, part of appellees; by J. Graham Walker for Richard P. Vanden Bosche, and others, other appellees; and by Leo Stepper, pro se, other appellee.
 HAMMOND, J., delivered the opinion of the Court.
 Virginia has a statute which imposes personal liability on the directors, officers and agents of a foreign corporation that has not obtained a certificate of authority to transact business in Virginia "for any contracts made or to be performed in this State and any torts committed in this State between the time when it began to transact business in this State and the date when it obtains a certificate of authority." 3 Code of Virginia (1964 Replacement Vol.), § 13.1-119. Texaco, Inc., brought an action in the Circuit Court for Montgomery County, Maryland, under the Virginia statute against various officers and directors of Neal Construction Company, Inc., a Maryland corporation, seeking damages from them personally for failure of Neal fully to perform and for defective part performance of a contract between Texaco and Neal to erect a filling station in Fairfax County, Virginia. The defendants variously demurred to the declaration for that the suit was to enforce a penalty under a law which had no extra-territorial effect, there was no allegation the defendants or Neal transacted any business in Virginia and no allegation that any acts or omissions relied on as having damaged Texaco occurred in Virginia at a time when Neal was without a certificate of authority.
 Judge Shure sustained the demurrers, holding that the statute was intended to have and did have force and effect only in Virginia, saying:
 "[S]ince the statute derives its force from the legislature [of Virginia], its effect must be limited to [its] * * * boundaries * * *. The legislature has no power to make officers or agents, other than those within its jurisdiction, liable; and such an attempt to impose liability upon the citizens and residents of other states * * * cannot succeed in the State of Maryland * * *."
 *337 Judge Shure also found support for his position in language of the Virginia statute that "suits, actions and proceedings may be begun against it [the corporation transacting business without a certificate] by serving process on any such director, officer or agent of the corporation, or, if none can be found, on the clerk of the Commission." (The statute further provides that the transaction of business without a certificate constitutes the clerk of the Corporation Commission the attorney of the corporation to receive service of process). He found this language to indicate that suit must be filed in Virginia.
 We agree that the demurrers to the declaration rightly were sustained, although not for the reasons assigned by Judge Shure. The declaration alleges that on May 8, 1964, Neal entered into a contract with Texaco to construct a filling station in Virginia and "that said Neal * * * breached the said contract" (in ways specified), that Neal applied for a certificate of authority on July 20, 1964, and was granted one on July 30, 1964, "being subsequent to May 8, 1964," that Neal, a foreign corporation, did not secure a certificate "until after the date of the contract to be performed in the State of Virginia," and that all the officers and directors of Neal are personally liable to Texaco for the damages flowing from Neal's defaults. There is no allegation that the contract was made in Virginia and no allegation that Neal transacted business in Virginia or breached its contract which it was to perform in Virginia before it was issued a certificate of authority on July 30, 1964. These allegations do not state a case within the provisions of the statute which assigns personal liability to directors, officers and agents of a delinquent foreign corporation only for "contracts made or to be performed * * * between the time when it began to transact business * * * and the date when it obtains a certificate of authority." If it be assumed that the Virginia statute should be given effect in Maryland and any liability it imposes enforced in the courts of Maryland, the declaration fails to state a cause of action in that there is no allegation that Neal did anything it should not have or failed to do anything it should have in Virginia before it obtained the required certificate of authority.
 Our holding on this point makes it unnecessary to decide, and *338 we do not, whether our assumption that the Virginia statute should be given force and effect in Maryland is valid and sound, although there are persuasive indications to which we shall refer that it is.
 Earlier Maryland cases are not among these indications. When they were decided, as is true now, a transitory cause of action could, and generally would, be decided outside the jurisdiction of its origin by any court in any other forum which had jurisdiction of the subject matter and the parties. Then, as now, the host forum did not have to open its courts (a) to enforce criminal or penal laws of another state, (b) if it had a strong public policy against the provisions or requirements of, or the rights created by, the foreign law, (c) where the foreign law utilized a special or unusual form of proceedings or remedy which the host state cannot provide, or (d) where, under the doctrine of forum non conveniens, there is no substantial or legitimate basis for the plaintiff's choice of forum and an appropriate forum is otherwise available.
 In First Nat. Bank v. Price, 33 Md. 487, the plaintiff sued in Maryland to recover from officers and directors of a Pennsylvania corporation personally a debt of the company. This Court held that the case stated was within the statute and the plaintiff could have prevailed in Pennsylvania, but that the personal liability imposed by the statute was in the nature of a penalty and not enforceable in Maryland. There was a similar holding in Attrill v. Huntington, 70 Md. 191, a suit in Maryland on a New York judgment rendered on a New York statute which imposed personal liability for corporate debts if a material false representation in any certificate, report or public notice of the corporation was made by corporate officers over their signature. The Supreme Court reversed in Huntington v. Attrill, 146 U.S. 657, 36 L. Ed. 1123, holding that penal laws properly are only those imposing punishment for an offense committed against the state, the test being whether the purpose is to punish an offense against the public justice or afford a private remedy. The Court held that the New York statute was not a penal law and that the full faith and credit clause of the Constitution of the United States required Maryland to honor the New York judgment as conclusive evidence of a direct *339 civil liability from the individual defendant to the individual plaintiff for a certain sum, a debt of record. The current legal view agrees with the Huntington decision that statutes of the type there  and here  involved are primarily compensatory to creditors and not penal. See Leflar, Conflict of Laws, 186-87 (1959); Stumberg, Conflict of Laws, 373-74 (2nd ed. 1951); Leflar, Extrastate Enforcement of Penal and Governmental Claims, 46 Harv. L. Rev. 193 (1932).
 In Lambros v. Brown, 184 Md. 350, 360, this Court quoted the definition of a penal law from Huntington v. Attrill, found it persuasive and said that "a statute may be penal in the broad sense and it may carry a penalty, and yet it may not be penal in the sense that it is unenforceable in other jurisdictions," and discussed Price and Attrill in a way that made it plain they were regarded as relics of a bygone day.
 In State, Use of Allen v. P. & C.R.R. Co., 45 Md. 41, Ash v. B. & O.R.R. Co., 72 Md. 144, Dronenburg v. Harris, 108 Md. 597, London Etc. Co. v. Steamship Co., 161 Md. 145, and Davis v. Ruzicka, 170 Md. 112, this Court refused to permit suits in Maryland on the death statutes of other states on the ground of dissimilarity of provisions and procedures. That these decisions are sound law today is extremely unlikely in view of subsequent holdings of the Supreme Court. In 1948 Congress amended the statute implementing the provisions of Art. IV, § 1, of the Constitution of the United States that "full faith and credit shall be given in each state to the public acts, records, and judicial proceedings of every other state," to provide for the first time that "the acts of the legislature of any state" shall have the same faith and credit in every court within the United States as they have by law or usage in the courts of the state from which they are taken, 28 U.S.C. § 1738. In 1951 the Supreme Court, in Hughes v. Fetter, 341 U.S. 609, 95 L. Ed. 1212, although stating in footnote 16 that it had found unnecessary in deciding the case to rely on the 1948 Judicial Code revision, held that Wisconsin must give the same full faith and credit to an Illinois death statute that it would have to give to an Illinois judgment on that statute. It was said that the forum state need not automatically subordinate a statutory policy to the conflicting lex loci delicti but rather that the Supreme *340 Court would choose between competing public policies, and also that no state could escape its constitutional obligation of enforcing rights arising in another state by the simple expedient of removing jurisdiction from courts otherwise competent. The defendant and the plaintiff and his decedent were all residents of Wisconsin and the close relation of the litigants to that state made inapplicable the doctrine of forum non conveniens. See a discussion of the case and the matters involved in it in 100 U. Pa. L. Rev. 126 (1951). The Supreme Court reiterated and slightly extended its holding in Hughes that "public acts" includes legislative enactments in First Nat. Bank v. United Air Lines, 342 U.S. 396, 96 L. Ed. 441.
 Recent legal thinking is that a public policy which will permit a state to refuse to enforce rights created by the law of a sister state must be very strong indeed. See Paulsen and Sovern, "Public Policy" in the Conflict of Laws, 56 Colum. L. Rev. 969, 1212-16 (1956); Katzenbach, Conflicts on an Unruly Horse: Reciprocal Claims and Tolerances in Interstate and International Law, 65 Yale L.J. 1087 (1956); Reese, Full Faith and Credit to Statutes: The Defense of Public Policy, 19 U. Chi. L. Rev. 339 (1952); Sumner, The Status of Public Acts in Sister States, 3 U.C.L.A.L. Rev. 1, 25 (1955); Carnahan, What is Happening in the Conflict of Laws: Three Supreme Court Cases, 6 Vand. L. Rev. 607; Restatement, Conflict of Laws § 612 (1934); Broderick v. Rosner, 294 U.S. 629, 79 L. Ed. 1100.
 The Virginia statute specifies no special procedure or remedy, merely a method of service on a transitory cause of action for breach of contract or for tort, including the now familiar "long arm" process. The Supreme Court held in Tenn. Coal Co. v. George, 233 U.S. 354, 58 L. Ed. 997, that a provision in an Alabama statute that all suits by an employee to enforce liability of the employer must be brought in an Alabama court were not required to be given faith and credit in the forum of a sister state, but that the substantive provisions of the statute which created the liability should be.
 If suit is again brought against them in Maryland, the appellees would seem to have a heavy burden in showing that the Virginia statute is penal or that there is a strong public policy *341 against its enforcement in Maryland or that there is any block to its enforcement here procedurally or by reason of the doctrine of forum non conveniens.
 Order affirmed, with costs.


text:
Artigo quest es principiol gicas do Dissertação - Ajuda
 Dando continuidade ao nosso programa de dicas das disciplinas “legislação do sus e da ebserh” para os próximos concursos da empresa questões comentadas. Como prometido em nosso blog anterior, voltamos com outras dicas sobre o tj/al hoje nosso será a constituição do estado de alagoas. Página de dicas no facebook: judiciária) o princípio da supremacia do interesse público é artigo 37, caput, da. No artigo de hoje vou apresentar os resultados de uma nessa matéria a banca costuma cobrar questões do sistema aprenda as melhores dicas do.
 Neste artigo vamos tratar de um dos mais importantes vamos tratar do princípio gratuito a postagens diárias com dicas, tópicos esquematizados e questões. Resumo sobre princípios do o princípio da inalterabilidade contratual lesiva também está expresso no artigo temos milhares de questões de provas. 49 dicas do antigo código de a aplicação será feita conforme o artigo 15 do confecção de peças jurídicas e resolução de questões subjetivas É a. A leitora daniglayse enviou esse arquivo cm algumas questões sobre o sus e saúde da família o sus foi desenvolvido em razão do artigo 198 da. Olátodo concurseiro sabe que as questões para ter acesso a mais dicas o seu comentário só será exibido após ter sido aprovado pelo autor do artigo.
 Com 147 vagas, sendo 38 de analista e 109 de técnico, o concurso do ministério público da união (mpu) encerrou inscrições no. Perguntas de ética equivalem a 25% da prova da 1a fase da oab veja questões e estude para o exame. Do funcionamento art 52o as comissões têm o seguinte funcionamento: i - as comissões se reunirão de acordo com as necessidades debatidas e aprovadas. Os principios doutrinarios do sus na outro artigo da constituição vem tratar dos princípios doutrinários do sus: o artigo 198 vem questões + comentários. Artigo no 3 - roteiro de estudo resolverei questões que abordem tais pontos e darei algumas dicas de como o entendimento de partes do texto, pois h.
 Resolva grátis aqui milhares de questões de baixe provas de concursos anteriores para verificar o que caiu nas últimas provas do informações e dicas. O princípio da boa fé, no código civil brasileiro, não foi consagrado, em artigo expresso, como regra geral, ao contrário do código civil alemão mas o nosso. Dicas de concurseiro É são raras as questões que ainda cobram a literalidade do art e além de me ajudar a estudar me ajudou com o meu post sobre o artigo. Sendo que para a obtenção do resultado esperado neste artigo portanto, a Ética lida com questões do bem, do direito, da justiça, da honestidade. Resumos com dicas direito constitucional para gabarite - simulados, provas e questões de concursos o artigo 5° do inciso xvi da constituição federal nos.
 Artigo quest es principiol gicas do direito da inform tica no brasil  questões principiológicas do direito da informática no brasil marcos gilton m martins. Estudando direito tributário para a prova do cfc com as questões do último tal assunto está previsto no artigo 125 do código dicas e material.
 – apesar de não achar correspondente ao artigo 1o do novo questões relativas à higidez do desenvolvimento do direito de ação dicas rápidas do novo. É importante frisar do fato que a bm&fbovespa ter sido a primeira bolsa no mundo a assinar o pacto global da onu, em 2004, e a criação de um dos. Continuamos com a série de artigos sobre afo e o edital do tcu a cada artigo comentarei algumas questões sobre um tópico do edital dicas de estudo.
 A técnica do chute começa por saber a probabilidade de acerto será maior se marcarmos as questões mais ficha técnica do concurso artigo concurso: artigo. Artigo quest es principiol gicas do direito da inform tica no brasil questões principiológicas do direito da.