type: legislation

text:
 AN COIMISIÚN EORPACH
 An Bhruiséil,19.12.2018
 COM(2018) 893 final
 2018/0433(COD)
 Togra le haghaidh
 RIALACHÁN Ó PHARLAIMINT NA hEORPA AGUS ÓN gCOMHAIRLE
 maidir le rialacha comhchoiteanna lena nx001eáirithítear aernascacht bhunúsach i dtaca le tarraingt siar Ríocht Aontaithe na Breataine Móire agus Thuaisceart Éireann as an Aontas
 (Téacs atá ábhartha maidir le LEE)
 MEABHRÁN MÍNIÚCHÁIN
 1.COMHTHÉACS AN TOGRA
 •Forais agus cuspóirí an togra
 An 29 Márta 2017, chuir an Ríocht Aontaithe isteach fógra á rá go raibh rún aici tarraingt siar as an Aontas de bhun Airteagal 50 den Chonradh ar an Aontas Eorpach. Dá bhrí sin, mura ndaingneofar an comhaontú um tharraingt siar
 1
 , scoirfidh dlí príomhúil agus dlí tánaisteach an Aontais d'fheidhm a bheith aige maidir leis an Ríocht Aontaithe ón 30 Márta 2019 ("dáta an tarraingt siar"). As sin amach, beidh an Ríocht Aontaithe ina tríú tír.
 Ní dhéanfar aerthaisteal idirnáisiúnta gan toiliú sainráite ó na Stáit lena mbaineann; tá sin amhlaidh mar go bhfuil ceannas iomlán agus eisiach acu ar an aerspás os cionn a gcríche. Is gnách le Stáit aerthaisteal a eagrú eatarthu trí bhíthin Comhaontuithe maidir le hAersheirbhísí (ASA) lena leagtar síos na cearta sonracha arna dtabhairt go frithpháirteach agus coinníollacha a bhfeidhmithe. Tá cearta tráchta agus seirbhísí a bhaineann go díreach lena bhfeidhmiú eisiata go sainráite ó raon feidhme an Chomhaontaithe Ghinearálta maidir le Trádáil Seirbhísí
 2
 .
 Laistigh den Aontas, tugtar an tsaoirse d’aeriompróirí na mBallstát (aeriompróirí an Aontais) aersheirbhísí laistigh den Aontas Eorpach a sholáthar le Rialachán (CE) Uimh. 1008/2008 ó Pharlaimint na hEorpa agus ón gComhairle an 24 Meán Fómhair 2008 maidir le rialacha comhchoiteanna le haghaidh oibriú aersheirbhísí sa Chomhphobal, lena leagtar síos na rialacha maidir leis na haeriompróirí sin a cheadúnú.
 Mura mbeidh aon fhorálacha ina aghaidh sin i gcomhaontú um tharraingt siar, scoirfidh aersheirbhísí idir an Ríocht Aontaithe agus na Ballstáit de bheith á rialú leis an Rialachán sin tar éis di tarraingt siar. Ina theannta sin, scoirfeadh aeriompróirí áirithe, de bharr ceadúnas oibríochta arna eisiúint ag an Ríocht Aontaithe a bheith acu, nó de bharr a bpríomhionad gnó a bheith lonnaithe sa Ríocht Aontaithe, nó de bharr a sciar tromlaigh a bheith ina seilbh ag an Ríocht Aontaithe nó ag a náisiúnaigh nó de bharr iad a bheith á rialú ag an Ríocht Aontaithe nó ag a náisiúnaigh i ndáiríre, scoirfidís siad de na coinníollacha a chomhlíonadh a leagtar síos sa Rialachán sin chun aeriompróirí an Aontais a cháiliú.
 Leanfar de sin, mura mbeidh forálacha ina aghaidh sin i gcomhaontú um tharraingt siar, nach mbeadh bunús dlí ann do na haeriompróirí aersheirbhísí a sholáthar idir an Ríocht Aontaithe agus na Ballstáit araon amhail ón 30 Márta 2019. Chaillfeadh na hiompróirí a gceadúnas oibríochta ón Aontas faoi in aon cheann de na cásanna thuasluaite agus, dá bharr sin, ní theachtfaidís an ceart níos mó aersheirbhísí a sholáthar laistigh den Aontas.
 Is seirbhísí aeriompair díreacha idir an Ríocht Aontaithe agus na Ballstáit ar fad, nach mór, atá ina seilbh ag aeriompróirí na Ríochta Aontaithe agus aeriompróirí an Aontais. Dá gcaillfeadh na haeriompróirí sin a gceart aersheirbhísí a sholáthar idir an Ríocht Aontaithe agus na Ballstáit, ba é an toradh a bheadh air sin briseadh tromchúiseach. Scoirfí de bheith ag freastal ar thromlach na naerbhealaí idir an tAontas agus an Ríocht Aontaithe, mura scoirfí de bheith ag freastal orthu ar fad. Os a choinne sin, ní bheadh aeriompróirí an Aontais in ann rochtain iomlán a fháil ar aerbhealaí laistigh den Aontas nach mbeadh aeriompróirí na Ríochta Aontaithe ag freastal orthu níos mó tar éis di tarraingt siar.
 I gcás nach mbeadh aon chomhaontú ann, meastar gur dhian na hiarmhairtí a bheadh ann don dá gheilleagar mar a thuairiscítear thíos: thiocfadh méadú suntasach ar fhad ama agus costais aerthaistil de réir mar a chuardófaí aerbhealaí malartacha, agus thiocfadh brú ar bhonneagar an aeriompair, dá bhrí sin, laistigh de na haerbhealaí malartacha sin agus thiocfadh laghdú ar an éileamh ar aeriompar freisin. Dá thoradh sin, chuirfí isteach, ní hamháin ar earnáil an aeriompair, ach ar earnálacha eile de chuid an gheilleagair atá ag brath go mór ar aeriompar chomh maith. Bheadh bacainní, dá bharr sin, ar an trádáil agus ar an ngnó i margaí i gcéin, agus ar lonnú nó athlonnú gnólachtaí. An briseadh sin i nascacht an aeriompair, ba chailleadh sócmhainne straitéisí í don Aontas agus do na Ballstáit.
 Sa Teachtaireacht ón gCoimisiún dar teideal Preparing for the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union on 30 March 2019: a Contingency Action Plan [Ullmhúchán do tharraingt siar na Ríochta Aontaithe as an Aontas Eorpach an 30 Márta 2019: Plean Gníomhaíochta Teagmhais] an 13 Samhain 2018
 3
 , d’fhógair an Coimisiún go raibh rún aige bearta a mholadh chun a áirithiú go dtabharfar cead d’aeriompróirí ón Ríocht Aontaithe eitilt thar chríoch an Aontais Eorpaigh, stadanna teicniúla a dhéanamh (e.g. athbhreoslú gan bordáil/díbhordáil na bpaisinéirí), chomh maith le tuirlingt san Aontas Eorpach agus eitilt ar ais chun na Ríochta Aontaithe. Bheadh na bearta sin faoi réir an choinníll go gcuirfeadh an Ríocht Aontaithe bearta coibhéiseacha i bhfeidhm maidir le haeriompróirí ón Aontas Eorpach.
 Is é is cuspóir don togra seo, mar sin, bearta sealadacha a leagan síos chun an taeriompar idir an tAontas agus an Ríocht Aontaithe a rialú tar éis di tarraingt siar as an Aontas (Airteagal 1). Tá sé d’aidhm ag na bearta sin nascacht bhunúsach a choinneáil ar feadh idirthréimhse ghearr (Airteagal 12).
 Sa chéad áit (Airteagal 3), foráiltear leis an Rialachán atá beartaithe cearta tráchta den chéad saoirse, den dara saoirse, den tríú saoirse agus den cheathrú saoirse a thabhairt go haontaobhach d’aeriompróirí na Ríochta Aontaithe ionas gur féidir leo leanúint de bheith ag eitilt thar chríoch an Aontais agus stadanna teicniúla a dhéanamh i gcríoch an Aontais agus freastal ar aerbhealaí díreacha idir an dá chríoch. Ní dhéantar aon idirdhealú idir oibríochtaí paisinéirí agus oibríochtaí lastais, nó idir seirbhísí sceidealta agus seirbhísí neamhsceidealta. I gcomhréir le cuspóir an Rialacháin atá beartaithe, eadhon nascacht bhunúsach a áirithiú, an toilleadh a cheadófar don Ríocht Aontaithe a thairiscint, beidh sé reoite ar na leibhéil a bhí ann roimh Brexit arna sloinneadh i líon eitiltí ("minicíochtaí"). Níor foráladh maidir le haon cheann de na nósanna solúbthachta oibríochtúla (amhail socruithe margaíochta comhoibritheacha, léasú aerárthaí, athrú aerárthaigh nó co-terminalisation) d’aeriompróirí na Ríochta Aontaithe chun aersheirbhísí a sholáthar faoin Rialachán.
 Maidir leis na cearta a thugtar d’aeriompróirí na Ríochta Aontaithe agus iad faoi réir phrionsabal na cómhalartachta, leagtar síos sa Rialachán atá beartaithe (Airteagal 4) sásra chun a áirithiú go mbeidh na cearta a theachtfaidh aeriompróirí an Aontais sa Ríocht Aontaithe coibhéiseach fós leis na cearta sin a thugtar d’aeriompróirí na Ríochta Aontaithe faoin Rialachán atá beartaithe. Murab amhlaidh an cás, tabharfar de chumhacht don Choimisiún na bearta is gá a ghlacadh chun é sin a chur ina cheart trí bhíthin gníomhartha cur chun feidhme, lena náirítear údaruithe oibríochta aeriompróirí na Ríochta Aontaithe a theorannú nó a tharraingt siar. Nuair a dhéanfaidh an Coimisiún measúnú ar leibhéal na coibhéise agus nuair a ghlacfaidh sé bearta ceartaitheacha, ní leis an gcomhfhreagras foirmiúil teoranta idir an dá dhlíchóras amháin a bhíonn na gníomhaíochtaí sin nasctha; is mar gheall ar na difríochtaí suntasacha idir an dá mhargadh a dhéantar sin agus chun cur chuige atá bunaithe ar shiméadracht ghlan a sheachaint - a d’fhéadfadh dul bunoscionn le leas an Aontais sa deireadh thiar thall.
 Go díreach mar a fhéachann an tAontas le comhaontuithe maidir lena aersheirbhísí ar fad a dhéanamh, leagtar síos sásra solúbtha leis an Rialachán atá beartaithe, fiú má tá sé d’aidhm aige nascacht bhunúsach a áirithiú go sealadach, chun a áirithiú go bhfaighidh aeriompróirí an Aontais deiseanna cothroma comhionanna chun dul in iomaíocht le haeriompróirí na Ríochta Aontaithe a luaithe a scoirfidh an Ríocht Aontaithe de bheith faoi cheangal a thuilleadh cloí le dlí an Aontais. Chun go mbeidh cothrom iomaíochta ann, tá sé riachtanach, fiú tar éis don Ríocht Aontaithe tarraingt siar as an Aontas, go leanfaidh sí de bheith ag cur i bhfeidhm caighdeáin atá ard go leor i réimse an aeriompair maidir leis an méid seo: iomaíocht chóir, lena náirítear cairtéil, mí-úsáid cinsealachta agus cumaisc a rialú; toirmeasc ar fhóirdheontais rialtais nach bhfuil údar leo; oibrithe a chosaint; an comhshaol a chosaint; sábháilteacht agus slándáil. Ina theannta sin, ní mór a áirithiú nach ndéanfar idirdhealú i gcoinne iompróirí an Aontais sa Ríocht Aontaithe, bíodh sin ar bhonn de iure nó ar bhonn de facto. Dá bhrí sin, cuirfear de chúram ar an gCoimisiún (Airteagal 5) leis an Rialachán atá beartaithe faireachán a dhéanamh ar choinníollacha na hiomaíochta idir aeriompróirí an Aontais agus aeriompróirí na Ríochta Aontaithe agus tabharfar de chumhacht dó na bearta is gá a ghlacadh, trí bhíthin gníomhartha cur chun feidhme, chun a áirithiú go mbeidh na coinníollacha sin á gcomhlíonadh i rith an ama.
 Bunófar na nósanna imeachta is gá ionas go mbeidh na Ballstáit in ann a fhíorú go bhfuair aeriompróirí, aerárthaí agus criúnna a bheidh ag eitilt isteach ina gcríoch faoin Rialachán seo ceadúnas ón Ríocht Aontaithe agus a dheimhniú i gcomhréir le caighdeáin sábháilteachta a aithnítear go hidirnáisiúnta, go gcomhlíonfar an reachtaíocht ábhartha náisiúnta uile agus reachtaíocht ábhartha uile an Aontais agus nach sárófar na cearta ceadaithe sin (Airteagail 6 go 9).
 Déantar foráil shainráite maidir lena mheabhrú nach mór do na Ballstáit gan dul i mbun caibidlíochta leis an Ríocht Aontaithe ná comhaontuithe déthaobhacha aersheirbhísí a dhéanamh leis an Ríocht Aontaithe maidir le hábhair a thagann faoi raon feidhme an Rialacháin seo agus nach mór dóibh gan aon chearta seachas iad sin a thugtar leis an Rialachán seo a thabhairt ar shlí eile d’aeriompróirí na Ríochta Aontaithe maidir le haeriompar. (Airteagal 3). Dá ainneoin sin, beidh na húdaráis inniúla sa dá chríoch in ann comhoibriú le chéile, ar ndóigh, de réir mar is gá ar mhaithe le cur chun feidhme éifeachtach an Rialacháin (Airteagal 10), sa dóigh go gcuirfear isteach ar bhainistiú na naersheirbhísí a laghad is féidir agus go leanfar de bheith ag soláthar na naersheirbhísí sin faoi choimirce na Ríochta Aontaithe tar éis di tarraingt siar as an Aontas.
 D'iarr an Chomhairle Eorpach arís (Airteagal 50) an 13 Nollaig 2018 go gcuirfí dlús leis an obair ar ullmhacht ar gach leibhéal d'iarmhairtí tharraingt siar na Ríochta Aontaithe agus go gcuirfí san áireamh na torthaí uile is féidir a bheith ar an tarraingt siar sin. Tá an gníomh seo ina chuid de phacáiste beart atá an Coimisiún a ghlacadh mar fhreagra ar an iarraidh sin.
 •Comhsheasmhacht le forálacha beartais atá sa réimse beartais cheana
 Tá an Rialachán seo atá beartaithe ceaptha mar lex specialis lena rachfar i ngleic le cuid de na hiarmhairtí a bheidh ann ós rud é nach mbeidh feidhm níos mó ag Rialachán (AE) Uimh. 1008/2008 maidir le haeriompar idir an Ríocht Aontaithe agus na Ballstáit eile ón dáta a tharraingeoidh an Ríocht Aontaithe siar as an Aontas agus in éagmais comhaontú um tharraingt siar. Tá na téarmaí atá beartaithe teoranta don mhéid is gá chuige sin, chun nach mbeidh bristeacha díréireacha ann. Tá sé beartaithe nach mbeidh feidhm acu ach ar feadh achar gairid. Dá bhrí sin, tá an togra seo iomlán comhsheasmhach leis an reachtaíocht atá ann cheana, go háirithe Rialachán (CE) Uimh. 1008/2008.
 •Comhsheasmhacht le beartais eile de chuid an Aontais
 Comhlánaítear leis an togra seo Rialachán (CE) Uimh. 1008/2008 ó Pharlaimint na hEorpa agus ón gComhairle. Cé gur urramaíodh an cur chuige a úsáideadh i gcomhaontuithe aeriompair an Aontais le tríú tíortha i réimsí áirithe (e.g. údaruithe oibríochta), is gá, mar gheall ar chuspóir sonrach agus comhthéacs an Rialacháin seo, agus ós rud e go bhfuil sé aontaobhach freisin, cur chuige níos sriantaí i leith cearta a thabhairt agus forálacha ar leith atá beartaithe chun comhionannas ceart agus cothrom iomaíochta a chaomhnú.
 2.BUNÚS DLÍ, COIMHDEACHT AGUS COMHRÉIREACHT
 •Bunús dlí
 Is é an bunús dlí atá leis Airteagal 100(2) den Chonradh ar Fheidhmiú an Aontais Eorpaigh (CFAE).
 •Coimhdeacht (maidir le hinniúlacht neamheisiach)
 Chomhlánófaí leis an ngníomh atá beartaithe Rialachán (CE) Uimh. 1008/2008 ó Pharlaimint na hEorpa agus ón gComhairle, chun go náiritheofar an nascacht bhunúsach d'ainneoin gur scoir an Rialachán d'fheidhm a bheith aige maidir le na hoibríochtaí iompair lena mbaineann. D'áiritheofaí an nascacht sin ar shlí chomhionann chomhionann i gcás na tráchta go dtí gach pointe san Aontas agus ó gach pointe san Aontas, rud a dhéanfaidh saobhadh sa mhargadh inmheánach a sheachaint. Dá bhrí sin, is gá gníomhaíocht a dhéanamh ar leibhéal an Aontais agus ní fhéadfaí an toradh a ghnóthú le gníomhaíocht ar leibhéal Ballstáit. .
 •Comhréireacht
 Meastar gur bhfuil an Rialachán atá beartaithe comhréireach ós féidir leis bristeacha díréireacha a sheachaint ar shlí a náiritheofar dálaí cothroma iomaíochta d’aeriompróirí an Aontais. Ní théann sé thar a bhfuil riachtanach chun an cuspóir sin a ghnóthú. Is amhlaidh atá, go háirithe, i gcás na gcoinníollacha faoina dtabharfar na cearta ábhartha, coinníollacha a bhaineann inter alia leis an ngá go dtabharfaidh an Ríocht Aontaithe cearta coibhéiseacha agus le haghaidh iomaíocht chóir agus theorannú an réimis in am.
 •An rogha ionstraime
 Ós rud é go rialaítear leis an ngníomh ábhair a bhaineann go dlúth le Rialachán (CE) Uimh. 1008/2008 agus go bhfuil sé dírithe, mar atá an Rialachán seo, ar dhálaí iomaíochta iomlán comhchuibhithe a áirithiú, ba cheart é a bheith i bhfoirm Rialacháin. Chomh maith leis sin, is í an fhoirm sin is fearr a chomhfhreagraíonn do phráinn an cháis/an chomhthéacs, ós rud é go bhfuil an tachar atá fágtha roimh an tarraingt siar (i gcás nach dtabharfar comhaontú um tharraingt siar i gcrích) róghairid chun go bhféadfar forálacha Treorach a thrasuí.
 3.TORTHAÍ Ó MHEASTÓIREACHTAÍ EX POST, Ó CHOMHAIRLIÚCHÁIN LEIS NA PÁIRTITHE LEASMHARA AGUS Ó MHEASÚNUITHE TIONCHAIR
 •Meastóireachtaí ex post/seiceálacha oiriúnachta ar an reachtaíocht atá ann cheana
 Ní infheidhme iad ós cás uathúil sealadach eisceachtúil é an cás arb éigean an togra seo a bheartú dá bharr nach mbaineann le cuspóirí na reachtaíochta atá ann cheana.
 •Comhairliúcháin leis na páirtithe leasmhara
 Tá na dúshláin a bhaineann le tarraingt siar na Ríochta Aontaithe as an Aontas agus roinnt réitigh fhéideartha luaite ag páirtithe leasmhara éagsúla san eitlíocht agus ionadaithe áirithe ó na Ballstáit.
 Téama coitianta sna barúlacha a cuireadh i láthair is ea go raibh gá le hidirghabháil rialála chun méid áirithe aernascachta a choinneáil. I dtaca le cearta tráchta, ní bheidh páirtithe leasmhara in ann a mbearta teagmhais féin a ghlacadh chun an tionchar díobhálach de bharr easpa comhaontaithe um tharraingt siar a mhaolú. Chuir ar a laghad sé cinn d’ionadaithe aeriompróirí agus de ghrúpaí ionadaithe aeriompróirí agus d’ionadaithe aerfort (trí Chomhairle Idirnáisiúnta Aerfoirt na hEorpa, den chuid is mó) an tuairim in iúl gur cheart an status quo le haeriompróirí na Ríochta Aontaithe a choinneáil tríd an leibhéal céanna den rochtain ar an margadh a bhí ann roimh an tarraingt siar a choinneáil. Os a choinne sin, chuir páirtithe leasmhara eile (ionadaithe aeriompróirí na 27 mBallstát, den chuid is mó) an bhéim ar an bpointe, áfach, nár cheart an status quo a choinneáil in éagmais ailíniú iomlán rialála chun cothrom iomaíochta sa mhargadh a áirithiú. An 12 Meitheamh 2018, d'eagraigh an Coimisiún ceardlann do na 27 mBallstát maidir le hullmhacht, ar lena linn a chuir saineolaithe eitlíochta sibhialta na mBallstát an bhéim go háirithe ar an ngá bearta teagmhais ar leibhéal an Aontais Eorpaigh a ghlacadh chun nascacht bhunúsach a áirithiú idir na 27 mBallstát agus an Ríocht Aontaithe i gcás nach mbeidh comhaontú um tharraingt siar ann.
 Tugadh aird iomchuí ar na tuairimí sin agus an togra á ullmhú.
 •Bailiú agus úsáid saineolais
 Chomhroinn páirtithe leasmhara ábhartha bealaí éagsúla measúnaithe ar iarmhairtí tharraingt siar na Ríochta Aontaithe in earnáil an aeriompair leis an gCoimisiún. Baineadh an chonclúid as na measúnuithe sin go mbeadh easpa aerthráchta idir na 27 mBallstát agus an Ríocht Aontaithe ina cúis le bristeacha suntasacha sna 27 mBallstát. Tá ról ríthábhachtach ag aernascacht sa gheilleagar ar fad. Ní hamháin go néascaíonn an eitlíocht soghluaisteacht ach spreagann sí trádáil, fás agus poist chomh maith. Is é €110 billiún an ranníocaíocht dhíreach a dhéanann an tionscal eitlíochta le holltáirgeacht an Aontais agus tá an tionchar airgeadais iomlán, lena náirítear an turasóireacht, chomh mór le €510 billiún tríd an éifeacht iolraitheora
 4
 . San iomlán, 16 % den trácht ar fad laistigh den Aontas in 2016, ba phaisinéirí a bhí ag taisteal idir na 27 mBallstát agus an Ríocht Aontaithe a bhí ann agus, cé gur tháinig athrú suntasach ar an bhfigiúr sin idir na Ballstáit agus go bhféadfaidh sé a bheith níos mó ná 25 %. Ina theannta sin, in 2017, chuir aeriompróirí arna gceadúnú ag an Ríocht Aontaithe 19,3 % den aerthrácht laistigh den Aontas i gcrích agus, os a choinne sin, chuir aeriompróirí arna gceadúnú ag an 27 mBallstát 44,7 % den aerthrácht idir na 27 mBallstát agus an Ríocht Aontaithe i gcrích. Tá roghanna malartacha iompair ar fáil, go sonrach naisc iarnróid agus naisc farraige ach níl siad ar fáil ach do líon beag tíortha amhail an Bheilg, an Fhrainc agus Éire. I dtaca le tíortha eile atá níos faide ar shiúl in Oirthear agus i nDeisceart an Aontais, tá amanna taistil ar na naisc iarnróid agus ar bhóithre chomh fada sin nach féidir aerthaisteal a chur in ionad na mbealaí sin. Dá bharr sin, ní mór an tionchar díobhálach suntasach sin ar chaillteanas iomlán na haernascachta do gheilleagar agus do shaoránaigh na 27 mBallstát a mhaolú.
 •Measúnú tionchair
 Ní gá measúnú tionchair a dhéanamh, ós cás eisceachtúil atá i gceist agus nach bhfuil ach beagán riachtanas ag baint leis an tréimhse ina gcuirfear chun feidhme athrú stádais na Ríochta Aontaithe. Níl aon rogha bheartais ar fáil atá éagsúil ó thaobh ábhair agus dlí de, ach amháin an rogha atá beartaithe.
 •Cearta bunúsacha
 Níl aon iarmhairt ag an togra seo ar chosaint ceart bunúsach.
 4.IMPLEACHTAÍ BUISÉADACHA
 Ní infheidhme iad.
 5.EILIMINTÍ EILE
 •Pleananna cur chun feidhme, agus socruithe faireacháin, meastóireachta agus tuairiscithe
 Ní infheidhme iad.
 2018/0433 (COD)
 Togra le haghaidh
 RIALACHÁN Ó PHARLAIMINT NA hEORPA AGUS ÓN gCOMHAIRLE
 maidir le rialacha comhchoiteanna lena náirithítear aernascacht bhunúsach i dtaca le tarraingt siar Ríocht Aontaithe na Breataine Móire agus Thuaisceart Éireann as an Aontas
 (Téacs atá ábhartha maidir le LEE)
 TÁ PARLAIMINT NA hEORPA AGUS COMHAIRLE AN AONTAIS EORPAIGH
 Ag féachaint don Chonradh ar Fheidhmiú an Aontais Eorpaigh, agus go háirithe Airteagal 100(2) de,
 Ag féachaint don togra ón gCoimisiún Eorpach,
 Tar éis dóibh an dréachtghníomh reachtach a chur chuig na parlaimintí náisiúnta,
 Ag féachaint don tuairim ó Choiste Eacnamaíoch agus Sóisialta na hEorpa
 5
 ,
 Ag féachaint don tuairim ó Choiste na Réigiúin
 6
 ,
 Ag gníomhú dóibh i gcomhréir leis an ngnáthnós imeachta reachtach,
 De bharr an méid seo a leanas:
 (1)Chuir an Ríocht Aontaithe isteach fógra, an 29 Márta 2017, á rá go raibh rún aici tarraingt siar as an Aontas de bhun Airteagal 50 den Chonradh ar an Aontas Eorpach. Beidh deireadh le feidhm na gConarthaí maidir leis an Ríocht Aontaithe ón dáta a thiocfaidh comhaontú um tharraingt siar i bhfeidhm nó, ina éagmais sin, dhá bhliain tar éis an fhógra sin, mar atá ón 30 Márta 2019, mura gcinnfidh an Chomhairle Eorpach, le toiliú ón Ríocht Aontaithe, d'aon ghuth síneadh a chur leis an tréimhse sin.
 (2)Leagtar amach i Rialachán (CE) Uimh. 1008/2008 ó Pharlaimint na hEorpa agus ón gComhairle
 7
 na coinníollacha maidir le ceadúnas oibríochta an Aontais a dheonú d'aeriompróirí agus bunaítear leis an tsaoirse aersheirbhísí a sholáthair laistigh den Aontas Eorpach.
 (3)In éagmais aon fhoráil speisialta, chuirfeadh tarraingt siar na Ríochta Aontaithe as an Aontas deireadh leis na cearta agus na hoibleagáidí uile a thagann as dlí an Aontais maidir le rochtain ar an margadh a bhunaítear le Rialachán (CE) Uimh. 1008/2008, a mhéid a bhaineann sin leis an gcaidreamh idir an Ríocht Aontaithe agus na 27 mBallstát eile.
 (4)Dá bharr sin, is gá sraith beart sealadach a bhunú lena gcumasófar d'iompróirí atá ceadúnaithe sa Ríocht Aontaithe seirbhísí aeriompair a chur ar fáil idir a críoch sin agus na 27 mBallstát eile. Chun cothromaíocht iomchuí a áirithiú idir an Ríocht Aontaithe agus na Ballstáit, níor cheart na cearta a thabharfar ar an gcaoi sin a thabhairt ach amháin ar choinníoll go dtabharfaidh an Ríocht Aontaithe cearta coibhéiseacha d'iompróirí atá ceadúnaithe san Aontas Eorpach agus go mbeidh siad faoi réir coinníollacha áirithe lena náiritheofar an iomaíocht chóir.
 (5)Ós rud é gur bearta sealadacha a bheidh sna bearta seo, ba cheart iad a theorannú do thréimhse ama ghearr, gan dochar d'aon chomhaontú a bhféadfaí a caibidlíocht a dhéanamh lena aghaidh agus a d'fhéadfadh teacht i bhfeidhm amach anseo lena gcumhdófaí cur ar fáil aersheirbhísí idir an tAontas agus an Ríocht Aontaithe.
 (6)Chun coinníollacha aonfhoirmeacha a áirithiú maidir leis an Rialachán seo a chur chun feidhme, ba cheart cumhachtaí cur chun feidhme a thabhairt don Choimisiún maidir le bearta a ghlacadh chun cómhalartacht chóir a áirithiú idir na cearta a dheonóidh an tAontas agus an Ríocht Aontaithe go haontaobhach ar aeriompróirí a chéile, agus lena áirithiú go bhféadfaidh iompróirí an Aontais dul in iomaíocht le hiompróirí na Ríochta Aontaithe faoi réir coinníollacha cothroma i dtaca le haersheirbhísí a chur ar fáil. Ba cheart na cumhachtaí sin a fheidhmiú i gcomhréir le Rialachán (AE) Uimh. 182/2011 ó Pharlaimint na hEorpa agus ón gComhairle
 8
 .
 (7)Ós rud é nach féidir leis na Ballstáit cuspóirí an Rialacháin seo, eadhon bearta sealadacha a leagan síos chun an taeriompar idir an tAontas agus an Ríocht Aontaithe a rialú i gcás nach ann do chomhaontú um tharraingt siar, a ghnóthú go leordhóthanach ach, de bharr a fhairsinge agus a éifeachtaí, gur fearr is féidir iad a ghnóthú ar leibhéal an Aontais, féadfaidh an tAontas bearta a ghlacadh, i gcomhréir le prionsabal na coimhdeachta a leagtar amach in Airteagal 5 den Chonradh ar an Aontas Eorpach. I gcomhréir le prionsabal na comhréireachta, a leagtar amach san Airteagal sin, ní théann an Rialachán seo thar mar is gá chun an cuspóir sin a bhaint amach.
 (8)Ba cheart forálacha an Rialacháin seo a theacht i bhfeidhm chomh luath géar agus is féidir agus ba cheart feidhm a bheith acu, i bprionsabal, ón lá tar éis an lae a bheidh deireadh le feidhm na gConarthaí maidir leis an Ríocht Aontaithe agus sa Ríocht Aontaithe mura rud é go mbeidh comhaontú um tharraingt siar arna thabhairt i gcrích leis an Ríocht Aontaithe tagtha i bhfeidhm faoin dáta sin. Mar sin féin, chun gur féidir na nósanna imeachta riaracháin riachtanacha a dhéanamh a luaithe is féidir, ba cheart forálacha áirithe a bheith i bhfeidhm ón dáta a thiocfaidh an Rialachán i bhfeidhm.
 TAR ÉIS AN RIALACHÁN SEO A GHLACADH:
 Airteagal 1
 Raon feidhme
 Leagtar síos leis an Rialachán seo bearta sealadacha lena rialaítear an taeriompar idir an tAontas agus Ríocht Aontaithe na Breataine agus Thuaisceart Éireann ("Ríocht Aontaithe") tar éis di tarraingt siar as an Aontas.
 Airteagal 2
 Sainmhínithe
 Chun críocha an Rialacháin seo, tá feidhm ag na sainmhínithe seo a leanas:
 1.ciallaíonn "aeriompar" paisinéirí, bagáiste, lasta agus post a iompar in aerárthaí, ar leithligh nó i gcomhcheangal, a chuirtear ar fáil don phobal ar luach saothair nó ar fruiliú, lena náirítear aersheirbhísí sceidealta agus neamhsceidealta;
 2.ciallaíonn “aeriompar idirnáisiúnta” aeriompar a ghabhann tríd an aerspás thar chríoch níos mó ná Stát amháin;
 3.ciallaíonn "aeriompróir de chuid an Aontais" aeriompróir a bhfuil ceadúnas bailí oibríochta aige a dheonaigh údarás ceadúnaithe inniúil i gcomhréir le Caibidil II de Rialachán (CE) Uimh. 1008/2008;
 4.ciallaíonn "aeriompróir na Ríochta Aontaithe" aeriompróir:
 (a)a bhfuil a phríomhionad gnó sa Ríocht Aontaithe; agus
 (b)a chomhlíonann ceann amháin den dá choinníoll seo a leanas:
 (i)gur leis an Ríocht Aontaithe agus/nó le náisiúnaigh na Ríochta Aontaithe níos mó ná 50 % den ghnóthas agus gurb iad a rialaíonn é le fírinne, go díreach nó go hindíreach trí ghnóthas idirmheánach amháin nó níos mó ná gnóthas idirmheánach amháin; nó
 (ii)gur le Ballstáit an Aontais agus/nó le náisiúnaigh Bhallstáit an Aontais agus/nó le Ballstáit den Limistéar Eorpach Eacnamaíoch agus/nó náisiúnaigh na Stát sin, in aon chomhcheangal díobh sin, bídís ina naonar nó leis an Ríocht Aontaithe agus/nó le náisiúnaigh na Ríochta Aontaithe níos mó ná 50 % den ghnóthas agus gurb iad a rialaíonn é le fírinne, go díreach nó go hindíreach trí ghnóthas idirmheánach amháin nó níos mó ná gnóthas idirmheánach amháin;
 (c)sa chás dá dtagraítear i bpointe (b)(ii), go bhfuil ceadúnas oibríochta bailí acu i gcomhréir le Rialachán (CE) Uimh. 1008/2008 ar an lá roimh an gcéad lá a chuirfear an Rialachán seo i bhfeidhm dá dtagraítear in Airteagal 12(2);
 5.ciallaíonn "rialú éifeachtach" caidreamh arb éard atá ann cearta, conarthaí nó aon mhodh eile, a thugann deis, ar leithligh nó go comhpháirteach agus ag féachaint do bhreithnithe an fhíorais nó an dlí lena mbaineann, tionchar cinntitheach a fheidhmiú go díreach nó go hindíreach ar ghnóthas, ar an gcaoi seo a leanas go háirithe:
 (a)tríd an gceart sócmhainní uile an ghnóthais, nó cuid díobh, a úsáid;
 (b)trí chearta nó trí chonarthaí a mbíonn tionchar cinntitheach acu ar chomhdhéanamh, ar vótáil nó ar chinntí comhlachtaí gnóthais nó a mbíonn tionchar cinntitheach acu ar shlí eile ar reáchtáil ghnó an ghnóthais;
 6.ciallaíonn "dlí na hiomaíochta" an dlí is ábhartha maidir leis an iompraíocht seo a leanas, i gcás ina bhfeadfaidh sé difear a dhéanamh do sheirbhísí aeriompair:
 (a)iompraíocht arb é atá ann:
 (i)comhaontuithe idir aeriompróirí, cinntí a dhéanann comhlachtaí aeriompróirí agus cleachtais chomhbheartaithe a bhfuil sé mar aidhm agus mar éifeacht acu an tiomaíochas a chosc, a shrianadh, nó a shaobhadh;
 (ii)mí-úsáid cinsealachta a dhéanann aeriompróir amháin nó níos mó
 (iii)bearta a dhéanann nó a choinníonn an Ríocht Aontaithe i bhfeidhm i gcás gnóthais phoiblí agus gnóthais dá ndeonaíonn an Ríocht Aontaithe cearta speisialta nó eisiacha atá contrártha le pointe (i) nó pointe (ii); agus
 (b)comhchruinnithe idir aeriompróirí a chuireann bac ar an iomaíocht éifeachtach, go háirithe de thoradh cinsealacht a chruthú nó a neartú;
 7.ciallaíonn "fóirdheontas" aon ranníocaíocht airgeadais a thugann an rialtas nó aon chomhlacht poiblí eile ar aon leibhéal d'aeriompróir, lena mbaineann sochar, agus ina náirítear:
 (a)aistriú díreach cistí, amhail deontais, iasachtaí nó insileadh cothromais, aistriú díreach féideartha cistí, glacadh dliteanas amhail ráthaíochtaí iasachta, instealltaí caipitil, úinéireacht, cosaint i gcoinne féimheachta nó árachas;
 (b)an méid roimhe seo nó ioncam atá dlite mura ndéanfaí é a bhailiú;
 (c)earraí nó seirbhísí, cé is moite de bhonneagar ginearálta, a sholáthar nó a cheannach; nó
 (d)íocaíochtaí a dhéanamh le sásra maoiniúcháin nó iad a chur ar iontaoibh nó a threorú chuig comhlacht príobháideach chun ceann amháin nó níos mó de na feidhmeanna a luaitear in (a), (b) agus (c) a dhéanamh, ar feidhmeanna iad a mbeadh ar an rialtas nó ar chomhlacht poiblí iad a dhéanamh de ghnáth, agus i gcás gur beag an difear atá idir an cleachtas agus na cleachtais a dhéanann rialtais de ghnáth.
 Ní mheastar go mbaineann aon sochar le rannaíocht airgeadais a dhéanann rialtas nó comhlacht poiblí eile, más rud é go bhféadfadh sé go mbeadh an ranníocaíocht airgeadais chéanna déanta ag oibreoir sa mhargadh príobháideach agus é dírithe ar fhéidearthachtaí brabúis amháin, agus a bheadh déanta sa chás céanna ag an gcomhlacht poiblí i gceist;
 8.ciallaíonn "údarás neamhspleách iomaíochta" údarás atá i gceannas ar dhlí na hiomaíochta a chur i bhfeidhm agus a fhorfheidhmiú, agus ar na fóirdheontais a rialú, ar údarás é a chomhlíonann gach ceann de na coinníollacha seo a leanas:
 (a)tá an túdarás neamhspleách ó thaobh oibríochta de agus tá na hacmhainní is gá aige chun a chuid cúraimí a dhéanamh;
 (b)agus a dhualgais á ndéanamh agus a chumhachtaí á bhfeidhmiú aige, beidh ag an údarás an ráthaíocht is gá maidir le neamhspleáchas ar aon tionchar polaitiúil nó ar aon tionchar seachtrach eile, agus gníomhaíonn sé go neamhchlaonta; agus
 (c)Tá na cinntí a dhéanann an túdarás faoi réir athbhreithniú breithiúnach;
 9.ciallaíonn "idirdhealú" aon chineál idirdhealaithe a dhéantar gan údar oibiachtúil i dtaca le hearraí agus seirbhísí a sholáthar, lena náirítear seirbhísí poiblí, i gcás oibríocht seirbhísí aeriompair, nó i ndáil leis an tslí a gcaitheann na húdaráis phoiblí is ábhartha maidir leis na seirbhísí sin leo;
 10.ciallaíonn "seirbhís aeriompair sceidealta" sraith eitiltí a mbaineann na saintréithe seo a leanas go léir leo:
 (a)ar gach eitilt bíonn suíocháin agus/nó toilleadh chun lasta a iompar agus/nó toilleadh chun post a iompar ar fáil ar féidir leis an bpobal iad a cheannach astu féin (go díreach ón aeriompróir nó óna ghníomhairí údaraithe);
 (b)oibrítear í chun freastal ar thrácht idir an dá aerfort chéanna nó níos mó ná an dá aerfort chéanna, cibé:
 (i)de réir tráthchlár foilsithe; nó
 (ii)le heitiltí a bhíonn ann chomh rialta nó chomh minic sin gur léir gur sraith chórasach iad;
 11.ciallaíonn "seirbhís aeriompair neamhsceidealaithe" seirbhís aeriompair tráchtála a fheidhmítear, cé is moite d'aersheirbhís sceidealaithe;
 12.ciallaíonn "críoch an Aontais" an chríoch talún sin, na huiscí inmheánacha sin agus na huiscí teorann de chuid na mBallstát a bhfuil feidhm ag an gConradh ar an Aontas Eorpach agus ag an gConradh ar Fheidhmiú an Aontais Eorpaigh maidir léi, faoi na coinníollacha a leagtar síos sna Conarthaí sin, agus an taerspás os a gcionn;
 13.ciallaíonn "críoch na Ríochta Aontaithe" críoch talún, uiscí inmheánacha agus uiscí teorann na Ríochta Aontaithe agus an taerspás os a gcionn;
 14. ciallaíonn "Coinbhinsiún” an Coinbhinsiún um Eitlíocht Shibhialta, a osclaíodh lena shíniú in Chicago an 7 Nollaig 1944.
 Airteagal 3
 Cearta tráchta
 1.Féadfaidh iompróirí na Ríochta Aontaithe, faoi na coinníollacha a leagtar síos sa Rialachán seo, an méid seo a leanas a dhéanamh:
 (a)eitilt thar chríoch an Aontais gan tuirlingt;
 (b)stadanna a dhéanamh i gcríoch an Aontais chun críocha nach mbaineann le trácht, de réir bhrí an Choinbhinsiún;
 (c)seirbhísí aeriompair idirnáisiúnta sceidealaithe agus neamhsceidealaithe a fheidhmiú do phaisinéirí, do chumasc de phaisinéirí agus de lasta agus seirbhísí uile-lasta idir aon dá phointe a bhfuil ceann amháin suite i gcríoch na Ríochta Aontaithe agus an ceann eile suite i gcríoch an Aontais;
 2.I gcomhréir le hAirteagal 4 agus Airteagal 5, maidir le seirbhísí aeriompair sceidealaithe a sholáthar de bhun an Rialacháin seo, ní rachaidh an toilleadh séasúrach iomlán a bheidh le soláthar ag aeriompróirí na Ríochta Aontaithe ar na bealaí idir an Ríocht Aontaithe agus gach Ballstát thar líon iomlán na minicíochtaí arna bhfeidhmiú ag na haeriompróirí sin ar na bealaí sin le linn shéasúr geimhridh agus shéasúr samhraidh IATA na bliana 2018.
 3.Ní dhéanfaidh na Ballstáit caibidlíocht ná ní thabharfaidh siad aon chomhaontú déthaobhach ná aon socrú i gcrích leis an Ríocht Aontaithe maidir le hábhair a thagann faoi raon feidhme an Rialacháin seo. Ní dheonóidh siad ar aon slí eile d’aeriompróirí na Ríochta Aontaithe, i dtaca le haeriompar de, aon chearta seachas na cearta sin a dheonaítear leis an Rialachán seo.
 Airteagal 4
 Coibhéis maidir le cearta
 1.Déanfaidh an Coimisiún faireachán ar na cearta a bheidh tugtha ag an Ríocht Aontaithe d'aeriompróirí an Aontais agus na coinníollacha a bhaineann lena bhfeidhmiú.
 2.I gcás ina gcinnfidh an Coimisiún nach bhfuil na cearta a bheidh tugtha ag an Ríocht Aontaithe d'aeriompróirí an Aontais coibhéiseach, de jure nó de facto, leis na cearta a thabharfar d'aeriompróirí na Ríochta Aontaithe faoin Rialachán seo, nó nach bhfuil na cearta sin ar fáil gan idirdhealú d'aeriompróirí uile an Aontais, féadfaidh sé, d'fhonn an choibhéis a athbhunú, trí bhíthin gníomhartha cur chun feidhme a ghlacfar i gcomhréir leis an nós imeachta dá dtagraítear in Airteagal 25(2) de Rialachán (CE) Uimh. 1008/2008:
 (a)an acmhainn atá ar fáil d'aeriompróirí na Ríochta Aontaithe faoi réir na teorann a leagtar síos in Airteagal 3(2) a choigeartú agus a cheangal ar na Ballstáit údaruithe oibríochta aeriompróirí na Ríochta Aontaithe, údaruithe atá ann cheana nó a deonaíodh le déanaí a oiriúnaí, dá réir sin;
 (b)a cheangal ar na Ballstáit na húdaruithe oibríochta sin a dhiúltú, a chur ar fionraí nó a chúlghairm. nó
 (c)bearta iomchuí eile a ghlacadh
 Airteagal 5
 Iomaíocht chóir
 1.Déanfaidh an Coimisiún faireachán ar na coinníollacha faoina rachaidh aeriompróirí agus aerfoirt an Aontais in iomaíocht le haeriompróirí agus aerfoirt na Ríochta Aontaithe i dtaca leis na haersheirbhísí a chumhdaítear leis an Rialachán seo a sholáthar.
 2.I gcás ina gcinnfidh sé, mar gheall ar aon cheann de na cásanna dá dtagraítear i mír 3 den Airteagal seo, go bhfuil na coinníollacha a bhfuil aeriompróirí na Ríochta Aontaithe ag baint tairbhe astu i bhfad níos fabhraí ná na coinníollacha sin, féadfaidh an Coimisiún, d'fhonn an choibhéis a athbhunú, trí bhíthin gníomhartha cur chun feidhme a ghlacfar i gcomhréir leis an nós imeachta dá dtagraítear in Airteagal 25(2) de Rialachán (CE) Uimh. 1008/2008:
 (a)an acmhainn atá ar fáil d'aeriompróirí na Ríochta Aontaithe laistigh den teorainn a leagtar síos in Airteagal 3(2) a choigeartú agus a cheangal ar na Ballstáit údaruithe oibríochta aeriompróirí na Ríochta Aontaithe a oiriúnú, idir na húdaruithe atá ann cheana agus na húdaruithe a deonaíodh le déanaí, dá réir sin;
 (b)a cheangal ar na Ballstáit na húdaruithe oibríochta sin a dhiúltú, a chur ar fionraí nó a chúlghairm maidir le haeriompróirí uile na Ríochta Aontaithe nó roinnt díobh. nó
 (c)bearta iomchuí eile a ghlacadh
 3.Féadfar gníomhartha tarmligthe faoi mhír 2 a ghlacadh chun na cásanna seo a leanas a leigheas:
 (a)an Ríocht Aontaithe fóirdheontais a dheonú;
 (b)gan dlí na hiomaíochta a bheith iar bun ag an Ríocht Aontaithe nó curtha i bhfeidhm ag an Ríocht Aontaithe;
 (c)gan údarás iomaíochta neamhspleách a bheith curtha ar bun agus á choinneáil ar bun ag an Ríocht Aontaithe;
 (d)caighdeáin maidir le cosaint oibrithe, sábháilteacht, slándáil, nó leis an gcomhshaol atá níos laige ná na caighdeáin a leagtar síos i ndlí an Aontais a bheith curtha i bhfeidhm ag an Ríocht Aontaithe, nó in éagmais forálacha ábhartha i ndlí an Aontais, atá níos laige ná na caighdeáin a chuirtear i bhfeidhm sna Ballstáit uile nó, i gcás ar bith, níos laige ná na caighdeáin idirnáisiúnta ábhartha;
 (e)aon chineál idirdhealaithe i gcoinne aeriompróirí an Aontais.
 4.Chun críocha mhír 1, féadfaidh an Coimisiún faisnéis a iarraidh ar údaráis inniúla na Ríochta Aontaithe, aeriompróirí na Ríochta Aontaithe nó aerfoirt na Ríochta Aontaithe. I gcás nach gcuirfidh údaráis inniúla na Ríochta Aontaithe, aeriompróir na Ríochta Aontaithe nó aerfort na Ríochta Aontaithe an fhaisnéis a iarradh ar fáil faoi cheann tréimhse ama réasúnta arna forordú ag an gCoimisiún, nó ina gcuirfidh siad faisnéis neamhiomlán ar fáil, féadfaidh an Coimisiún déanamh de réir mhír 2.
 Airteagal 6
 Údarú oibríochta
 1.Gan dochar do reachtaíocht an Aontais ná don reachtaíocht náisiúnta maidir le sábháilteacht eitlíochta, chun na cearta a dheonaítear dóibh faoi Airteagal 3 a fheidhmiú, cuirfear de cheangal ar aeriompróirí na Ríochta Aontaithe údarú oibríochta a fháil ó gach Ballstát ina dteastaíonn uathu oibriú.
 2.Tar éis dóibh iarratas ar údarú oibríochta a fháil ó aeriompróir de chuid na Ríochta Aontaithe, déanfaidh an Ballstát lena mbaineann an túdarú oibríochta iomchuí a dheonú gan moill mhíchuí, ar choinníoll:
 (a)go bhfuil ceadúnas oibríochta bailí arna eisiúint i gcomhréir le reachtaíocht na Ríochta Aontaithe ag aeriompróir na Ríochta Aontaithe is iarratasóir; agus
 (b)go ndéanann agus go coinníonn an Ríocht Aontaithe ar bun rialú rialála éifeachtach ar aeriompróir na Ríochta Aontaithe is iarratasóir, go naithnítear an túdarás inniúil go soiléir agus go bhfuil deimhniú aeroibreora atá curtha ar fáil ag an údarás sin ag aeriompróir na Ríochta Aontaithe.
 3.Gan dochar don ghá atá ann go leor ama a thabhairt chun measúnuithe riachtanacha a dhéanamh, beidh aeriompróirí na Ríochta Aontaithe i dteideal a niarratais ar údaráis oibríochta a chur isteach ón lá a thiocfaidh an Rialachán seo i bhfeidhm. Beidh sé de chumhacht ag na Ballstáit na hiarratais sin a fhormheas amhail ón lá sin, ar choinníoll go gcomhlíonfar na coinníollacha maidir leis an bhformheas sin. Mar sin féin, ní bheidh éifeacht ag aon údaruithe a dheonófar ar an gcaoi sin níos túisce ná an chéad lá de chur i bhfeidhm an Rialacháin dá dtagraítear in Airteagal 12(2).
 Airteagal 7
 Pleananna, cláir agus sceidil oibríochta
 1.Cuirfidh aeriompróirí na Ríochta Aontaithe pleananna, cláir agus sceidil oibríochta maidir le haersheirbhísí isteach lena bhformheas chuig údaráis inniúla gach Ballstáit lena mbaineann. Déanfar aon chur isteach den chineál sin 30 lá ar a laghad roimh thús na noibríochtaí.
 2.I gcomhréir le hAirteagal 6, féadfar na pleananna oibríochta, na cláir agus na sceidil do shéasúr IATA atá ann ar an gcéad lá a chuirfear an Rialachán seo dá dtagraítear in Airteagal 12(2) i bhfeidhm agus na pleananna oibríochta, na cláir agus na sceidil sin don chéad séasúr eile dá éis sin a chur isteach agus a fhormheas, roimh an dáta sin.
 Airteagal 8
 Údarú a dhiúltú, a chúlghairm, a fhionraí agus a theorannú
 1.Diúltóidh na Ballstáit údarú oibríochta aeriompróra de chuid na Ríochta Aontaithe, nó de réir an cháis, déanfaidh siad é sin a chúlghairm nó a fhionraí sna cásanna seo a leanas:
 (a)níl an taeriompróir cáilithe ina aeriompróir de chuid na Ríochta Aontaithe de réir an Rialacháin seo; nó
 (b)níl na coinníollacha a leagtar síos in Airteagal 6(2) comhlíonta.
 2.Déanfaidh na Ballstáit coinníollacha maidir le húdarú oibríochta aeriompróra de chuid na Ríochta Aontaithe a dhiúltú, a chúlghairm, a fhionraí, a theorannú nó a fhorchur, nó déanfaidh siad coinníollacha maidir le húdarú oibríochta aeriompróra de chuid na Ríochta Aontaithe a theorannú nó a fhorchur in aon cheann de na cásanna seo a leanas:
 (a)na ceanglais sábháilteachta agus slándála atá infheidhme, níl siad comhlíonta;
 (b)na ceanglais is infheidhme maidir le haerárthaí a bheidh ag gabháil don aeriompar a ligean isteach i gcríoch an Bhallstáit lena mbaineann, maidir le hiad a oibriú sa chríoch sin agus maidir le hiad imeacht as an gcríoch sin, níl siad comhlíonta;
 (c)na ceanglais is infheidhme maidir le paisinéirí, criú, bagáiste, lasta agus/nó post (lena náirítear rialacháin maidir le hiontráil, imréiteach, inimirce, pasanna, custaim agus coraintín, nó i gcás poist, rialacháin maidir le post) a ligean isteach i gcríoch an Bhallstáit lena mbaineann, maidir le oibríochtaí ina leith sin a dhéanamh sa chríoch sin agus maidir le hiad imeacht as an gcríoch sin, níl siad comhlíonta;
 3.Déanfaidh na Ballstáit coinníollacha maidir le húdaruithe oibríochta aeriompróirí na Ríochta Aontaithe a dhiúltú, a chúlghairm, a fhionraí, a theorannú nó a fhorchur, nó déanfaidh siad coinníollacha maidir le hoibríochtaí aeriompróirí na Ríochta Aontaithe a theorannú nó a fhorchur, i gcás ina gceanglóidh an Coimisiún orthu sin a dhéanamh i gcomhréir le hAirteagal 4 nó Airteagal 5:
 4.Cuirfidh gach Ballstát an Coimisiún agus na Ballstáit eile ar an eolas faoi aon chinntí údarú aeriompróra de chuid na Ríochta Aontaithe a dhiúltú nó a chúlghairm de bhun mhír 1 agus mhír 2.
 Airteagal 9
 Deimhnithe agus ceadúnais
 Maidir le deimhnithe aeracmhainneachta, deimhnithe inniúlachta agus ceadúnais arna neisiúint nó arna mbailíochtú ag an Ríocht Aontaithe atá i bhfeidhm fós, aithneoidh na Ballstáit go mbeidh na deimhnithe sin agus na ceadúnais sin bailí chun críche seirbhísí aeriompair a bheith á noibriú ag aeriompróirí na Ríochta Aontaithe faoin Rialachán seo, ar choinníoll gur eisíodh agus gur bailíochtaíodh na deimhnithe sin agus na ceadúnais sin de bhun na gcaighdeán idirnáisiúnta ábhartha, ar a laghad, a bunaíodh faoin gCoinbhinsiún agus i gcomhréir leis na caighdeáin sin.
 Airteagal 10
 Comhairliúchán agus comhar
 1.Rachaidh údaráis inniúla na mBallstát i gcomhairle agus i gcomhar le húdaráis inniúla na Ríochta Aontaithe de réir mar is gá chun a áirithiú go gcuirfear an Rialachán seo chun feidhme.
 2.Cuirfidh na Ballstáit ar fáil don Choimisiúin, arna iarraidh sin orthu, gan aon mhoill mhíchuí aon fhaisnéis a fuarthas de bhun mhír 1 nó aon fhaisnéis eile is ábhartha chun Airteagal 4 agus Airteagal 5 den Rialachán seo a chur chun feidhme.
 Airteagal 11
 An Coiste
 Déanfaidh an coiste a bunaíodh le hAirteagal 25 de Rialachán (CE) Uimh. 1008/2008 cúnamh a thabhairt don Choimisiún.
 Airteagal 12
 Teacht i bhfeidhm agus cur i bhfeidhm
 1.Tiocfaidh an Rialachán seo i bhfeidhm an lá tar éis lá a fhoilsithe in Iris Oifigiúil an Aontais Eorpaigh.
 2.Beidh feidhm aige ón lá tar éis an lae a scoirfidh dlí an Aontais d'fheidhm a bheith aige maidir leis an Ríocht Aontaithe de bhun Airteagal 50(3) den Chonradh ar an Aontas Eorpach.
 Mar sin féin, beidh feidhm ag Airteagal 6(3) agus ag Airteagal 7(2) ó theacht i bhfeidhm an Rialacháin seo.
 3.Ní bheidh feidhm ag an Rialachán seo má tháinig comhaontú um tharraingt siar, arna thabhairt i gcrích leis an Ríocht Aontaithe i gcomhréir le hAirteagal 50(2) den Chonradh ar an Aontas Eorpach, i bhfeidhm faoin dáta dá dtagraítear sa chéad fhomhír de mhír 2.
 4.Scoirfidh an Rialachán seo d’fheidhm a bheith aige ar an dáta is luaithe den dá dháta seo a leanas:
 (a)an dáta a thiocfaidh comhaontú idir an tAontas agus an Ríocht Aontaithe i bhfeidhm lena rialaítear aeriompar eatarthu a sholáthar nó, de réir an cháis, an dáta a chuirfear i bhfeidhm go sealadach é; nó
 (b)30 Márta 2020
 Beidh an Rialachán seo ina cheangal go huile agus go hiomlán agus beidh sé infheidhme go díreach i ngach Ballstát.
 Arna dhéanamh sa Bhruiséil,
 Thar ceann Pharlaimint na hEorpa
 Thar ceann na Comhairle
 An tUachtarán
 An tUachtarán
 (1)
 https://ec.europa.eu/commission/sites/beta-political/files/draft_withdrawal_agreement_0.pdf
 .
 (2)
 Iarscríbhinn 1B a ghabhann leis an gComhaontú lena mBunaítear an Eagraíocht Dhomhanda Trádála, arna dhéanamh in Marrakech an 15 Aibreán 1994.
 (3)
 COM(2018) 880 final
 (4)
 Steer Davies Gleave – Study on employment and working conditions in air transport and airports (Staidéar ar an bhfostaíocht agus ar na dálaí oibre in earnáil an aeriompair agus in aerfoirt): tuarascáil deiridh, 2015
 (5)
 IO C , , lch. .
 (6)
 IO C , [...], lch. .
 (7)
 Rialachán (CE) Uimh. 1008/2008 ó Pharlaimint na hEorpa agus ón gComhairle an 24 Meán Fómhair 2008 maidir le rialacha comhchoiteanna le haghaidh oibriú aersheirbhísí sa Chomhphobal (Athmhúnlú) (IO L 293, 31.10.2008, lch. 3).
 (8)
 Rialachán (AE) Uimh. 182/2011 ó Pharlaimint na hEorpa agus ón gComhairle an 16 Feabhra 2011 lena leagtar síos na rialacha agus na prionsabail ghinearálta a bhaineann leis na sásraí maidir le rialú ag na Ballstáit ar fheidhmiú cumhachtaí cur chun feidhme ag an gCoimisiún (IO L 55, 28.2.2011, lch. 13).


type: caselaw

jurisdiction: EU

text:
C 234/2 IT Gazzetta ufficiale delle ComunitaÁ europee 25.7.98
 SENTENZA DELLA CORTE 3) Le spese sostenute dal Regno Unito di Gran Bretagna
 e Irlanda del Nord restano a carico degli stessi.
 (Sesta Sezione)
 7 maggio 1998 (1) GU C 158 dell'1.6.1996.
 nella causa C-124/96: Commissione delle ComunitaÁ euro-
 pee contro Regno di Spagna, sostenuto da Regno Unito di
 Gran Bretagna e Irlanda del Nord (1)
 (Inadempimento Ð Sesta direttiva del Consiglio 77/388/
 CEE Ð Esenzione di talune prestazioni di servizi stretta-
 mente connesse con la pratica dello sport o dell'educa-
 zione fisica Ð Restrizioni non giustificate) SENTENZA DELLA CORTE
 (Quinta Sezione)
 (98/C 234/02)
 7 maggio 1998
 nel procedimento C-401/96 P: Somaco SARL contro Com-
 (Lingua processuale: lo spagnolo)
 missione delle ComunitaÁ europee (1)
 (Ricorso contro una pronuncia del Tribunale di primo
 grado Ð Concorrenza Ð Insussistenza di comportamento
 (Traduzione provvisoria; la traduzione definitiva saraÁ pub- anticoncorrenziale alla Martinica a motivo di pressioni
 blicata nella «Raccolta della giurisprudenza della Corte») irresistibili da parte dell'amministrazione locale Ð Snatu-
 ramento degli elementi di prova)
 (98/C 234/03)
 Nella causa C-124/96: Commissione delle ComunitaÁ euro-
 pee (agenti: signori Enrico Traversa e Francisco Enrique
 GonzaÂlez Diaz), contro Regno di Spagna (agente: signor
 Luis PeÂrez de Ayala Becerril), sostenuto da Regno Unito di (Lingua processuale: il francese)
 Gran Bretagna e Irlanda del Nord (agente: signora Lindsey
 Nicoll, assistita dalla signora Sarah Moore), avente ad
 oggetto un ricorso diretto a far dichiarare che, stabilendo
 che l'esenzione dall'IVA a favore delle prestazioni stretta- (Traduzione provvisoria; la traduzione definitiva saraÁ pub-
 mente connesse con la pratica dello sport o dell'educa- blicata nella «Raccolta della giurisprudenza della Corte»)
 zione fisica si applica solo agli stabilimenti privati le cui
 quote d'ingresso o i cui canoni periodici non superino un
 certo importo, il Regno di Spagna ha violato l'art. 13, Nel procedimento C-401/96 P, Somaco SARL, con sede in
 sub A, n. 1, lett. m), della sesta direttiva del Consiglio Fort de France (Francia), rappresentata dall'avv. Jean-
 17 maggio 1977, 77/388/CEE in materia di armonizza- Claude Fourgoux, del foro i Parigi, con domicilio eletto in
 zione delle legislazioni degli Stati membri relative alle Lussemburgo presso lo studio dell'avv. Pierrot Schiltz, 4,
 imposte sulla cifra di affari Ð Sistema comune di imposta rue BeÂatrix de Bourbon, avente ad oggetto il ricorso
 sul valore aggiunto: base imponibile uniforme (GU L 145 diretto all'annullamento della sentenza pronunciata dal
 del 13.6.1977, pag. 1), la Corte (Sesta Sezione), composta Tribunale di primo grado delle ComunitaÁ europee (Quarta
 dai signori H. Ragnemalm, presidente di sezione, G.F. Sezione ampliata) il 18 settembre 1996, nella causa T-387/
 Mancini, P.J.G. Kapteyn (relatore), J.L. Murray e K.M. 94, Asia Motor France/Commissione (Racc. pag. II-961),
 Ioannou, giudici; avvocato generale: A. La Pergola, cancel- procedimento in cui l'altra parte eÁ: Commissione delle
 liere: R. Grass, ha pronunciato il 7 maggio 1998 una sen- ComunitaÁ europee, (agente: signor Berend Jan Drijber,
 tenza il cui dispositivo eÁ del seguente tenore: assistito dall'avv. HerveÂ Lehman), la Corte (Quinta
 Sezione), composta dai signori C. Gulmann (relatore), pre-
 sidente di sezione, M. Wathelet, D.A.O. Edward, P. Jann e
 1) Stabilendo che l'esenzione dall'IVA a favore delle pre- L. Sevón, giudici, avvocato generale: G. Tesauro, cancel-
 stazioni strettamente connesse con la pratica dello liere: R. Grass, ha pronunciato il 7 maggio 1998 una sen-
 sport o dell'educazione fisica si applica solo agli stabi- tenza il cui dispositivo eÁ del seguente tenore:
 limenti privati le cui quote d'ingresso o i cui canoni
 periodici non superino un certo importo, il Regno di
 Spagna eÁ venuto meno agli obblighi ad esso incom- 1) Il ricorso eÁ respinto.
 benti in forza dell'art. 13, sub A, n. 1, lett. m), della
 sesta direttiva del Consiglio 17 maggio 1977, 77/388/
 CEE, in materia di armonizzazione delle legislazioni
 2) La Somaco SARL eÁ condannata alle spese.
 degli Stati membri relative alle imposte sulla cifra di
 affari Ð Sistema comune di imposta sul valore
 aggiunto: base imponibile uniforme. (1) GU C 54 del 22.2.1997.
 2) Il Regno di Spagna eÁ condannato alle spese.


type: contracts

text:
 Avis juridique important
 |
 21987D1231(03)
 Decision No 2/87 of the EEC-Austria Joint-Committee of 13 November 1987 supplementing and amending Protocol 3 concerning the definition of the concept of originating products and methods of administrative cooperation, to provide for further simplification of documentation required as evidence of origin
 Official Journal L 388 , 31/12/1987 P. 0014 - 0017
 DECISION N° 2/87 OF THE EEC-AUSTRIA JOINT COMMITTEE of 13 November 1987 supplementing and amending Protocol 3 concerning the definition of the concept of originating products and methods of administrative cooperation, to provide for further simplification of documentation required as evidence of originTHE JOINT COMMITTEE,Having regard to the Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Republic of Austria, signed in Brussels on 22 July 1972,Having regard to Protocol 3 concerning the definition ofthe concept of originating products and methods of administrative cooperation, and in particular Article 28 thereof,Whereas, under the simplified procedures, the documentation constituting evidence of originating status can be still further simplified by allowing approved exporters as defined in Article 13 (2) of Protocol 3 to make a declaration of origin on the invoice instead of using anEUR. 1 movement certificate;Whereas the spread of computerization and the transmission of invoices by means of telecommunications media pose problems as regards the hand-written signature of declarations of origin on invoices;Whereas it is desirable, so as not to inhibit the expansion of the use of these modern systems for the establishment and transmission of invoices, that the authorizations accorded to approved exporters wishing to use such systems should waive the need for handwritten signature of the origin declarations; whereas exporters accorded such an authorization should, nevertheless, be obliged to comply with the conditions laid down for that purpose by the customs authorities of the exporting country;Whereas provision should be made for the conditions and procedures relating to the above simplification,HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:Article 1Protocol 3 to the Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Republic of Austria is hereby amended as follows:1. Article 8 (1) is replaced by the following:'1. Originating products within the meaning of this Protocol shall, on import into the Community orAustria, benefit from the Agreement upon submission of one of the following:(a) an EUR. 1 movement certificate, hereinafter referred to as an ''EUR. 1 certificate'', or an EUR. 1 certificate valid for a long term, and invoices referring to such certificate, made out in accordance with Article 13. A specimen of the EUR. 1 certificate is given in Annex V to this Protocol;(b) an invoice bearing the exporter's declaration as given in Annex VI to this Protocol, made out in accordance with Article 13;(c) an invoice bearing the exporter's declaration as given in Annex VI to this Protocol, made out by any exporter for any consignment consisting of one or more packages containing originating products whose total value does not exceed 4 400 ECU.'2. Article 13 is replaced by the following:'Article 131. Notwithstanding Articles 9 (1) to (7) and 10 (1), (4) and (5) of this Protocol, a simplified procedure for the issue of the documentation relating to the evidence of origin shall be applicable under the terms of the provisions set out below.2. The customs authorities in the exporting State may authorize any exporter, hereinafter referred to as ''approved exporter'', who makes frequent shipments for which EUR. 1 certificates may be issued, and who offers to the satisfaction of the customs authorities all guarantees necessary to verify the originating status of the goods, not to submit to the customs office in the exporting State at the time of export either the goods or the application for an EUR. 1 certificate relating to those goods, for the purpose of obtaining an EUR. 1 certificate under the conditions laid down in Article 9 (1) to (4) of this Protocol.3. In addition, the customs authorities may authorize an approved exporter to draw up EUR. 1 certificates, valid for a maximum period of one year from the date of issue, hereinafter referred to as ''LT certificates''. The authorization shall be granted only where the originating status of the goods to be exported is expected to remain unchanged for the period of validity of the LT certificate. If any goods are no longer covered by the LT certificate, the approved exporter shall immediately inform the customs authorities who gave the authorization.Where the simplified procedure applies, the customs authorities of the exporting State may prescribe the use of EUR. 1 certificates bearing a distinctive sign by which they may be identified.4. The authorization referred to in paragraphs 2 and 3 shall stipulate, at the choice of customs authorities, that box 11, ''customs endorsement'', of the EUR. 1 certificate must:(a) either be endorsed beforehand with the stamp of the competent customs office of the exporting State and the handwritten or non-handwritten signature of an official of that office; or(b) be endorsed by the approved exporter with a special stamp which has been approved by the customs authorities of the exporting State and corresponds to the specimen given in Annex VII to this Protocol: this stamp may be preprinted on the form.Box 11 ''customs endorsement'', of the EUR. 1 certificate shall be completed if necessary by the approved exporter.5. In the cases referred to in paragraph 4 (a), one of the following phrases shall be entered in box 7, ''Remarks'', of the EUR. 1 certificate: ''Simplified procedure'', ''Forenklet procedure'', ''Vereinfachtes Verfahren'', ''Aplozstezménh diadikasía'', ''Procédure simplifiée'', ''Procedura semplificata'', ''Vereenvoudigde procedure'', ''Procedimiento simplificado''. ''Yksinker-taistettu menettely'', ''Einfoeldud afgreidsla'', ''Forenklet prosedyre'', ''Procedimento simplificado'', ''Foerenklad procedur''. The approved exporter shall if necessary indicate in box 13, ''Request for verification'', the name and address of the customs authority competent to verify the EUR. 1 certificate.6. In the case referred to in paragraph 3, the approved exporter shall also enter in box 7 of the EUR. 1 certificate one of the following phrases:''LT certificate valid until . . .'' (date indicated in Arabic numerals),''LT-certifikat gyldigt indtil . . .'',''LT-Certificat gueltig bis . . .'',''Pistopoihtikón LT isx ́zon méxri . . .'',''certificato LT valido fino a . . .'',''certificat LT valable jusqu'au . . .'',''LT-skírteini gildir til . . .'',''certificado LT válido hasta el . . .'',''LT-certificaat geldig tot en met . . .'',''LT-Sertifikat gyldig intil . . .'',''LT-todistus voimassa . . . saakka'',''LT-certifikat giltigt till . . .'',''certificado LT valido até . . .'',and a reference to the authorization under which the relevant LT certificate has been issued.The approved exporter shall not be required to refer in box 8 and box 9 of the LT certificate to the marks and numbers and number and kind of packages and the gross weight (kilograms) or other measure (litres, m=, etc.).Box 8 must, however, contain a description and designation of the goods which is sufficiently precise to allow for their identification.7. Notwithstanding Article 12 (1) and (3), the LT certificate must be submitted to the customs office of import at or before the first importation of any goods to which it relates. When the importer carries out the customs clearance at several customs offices in the State of importation, the customs authorities may request him to produce a copy of the LT certificate to all of those offices.8. Where an LT certificate has been submitted to the customs authorities, the evidence of the originating status of the imported goods shall, during the validity of the LT certificate, be given by invoices which satisfy the following conditions:(a) when an invoice includes both goods originating in the Community or one of the countries referred to in Article 2 (1) of this Protocol and non-originating goods, the exporter shall distinguish clearly between these two categories;(b) the exporter shall state on each invoice the number of the LT certificate which covers the goods and the date of expiry of the certificate and the names ofthe country or countries in which the goods originate.The statement on the invoice made by the exporter of the number of the LT certificate with the indication of the country of origin shall constitute a declaration that the goods fulfill the conditions laid down in this Protocol for the acquisition of preferential origin status in trade between the Community and Austria.The customs authorities of the exporting State may require that the entries which, under the above provisions, must appear on the invoice, be supported by the manuscript signature followed by the name of the signatory in clear script;(c) the description and the designation of the goods on the invoice shall be in sufficient detail to show clearly that the goods are also listed on the LT certificate to which the invoice refers;(d) the invoices can be made out only for the goods exported during the period of validity of the relevant LT certificate. They may, however, be produced at the import customs office within four months of the date of their being made out by the exporter.9. In the framework of the simplified procedures, invoices which satisfy the conditions of this Article may be made out and/or transmitted using telecommunications or electronic data-processing methods. Such invoices shall be accepted by the customs of the importing State as evidence of the originating status of the goods imported in accordance with the procedures laid down by the customs authorities there.10. Should the customs authorities of the exporting State identify that a certificate and/or invoice issued under the provisions of this Article is invalid in relation to any goods supplied, they shall immediately notify the customs authorities of the importing State of the facts.11. The customs authorities may authorize an approved exporter to make out invoices bearing the declaration given in Annex VI to this Protocol in place of EUR. 1 certificates.The declaration made by the approved exporter on the invoice shall be signed in manuscript and must either:(a) have a reference to the approved exporter's authorization number, or(b) be endorsed by the approved exporter with the special stamp referred to in paragraph 4 (b) which has been approved by the customs authorities of the exporting State. This stamp may be preprinted on the invoice.12. However, the customs authorities in the exporting State may authorize an approved exporter not to sign the statement in paragraph 8 (b) or the declaration referred to in paragraph 11 given on the invoice, when such invoices are made out and/or transmitted using telecommunications or electronic data-processing methods.The said customs authorities shall lay down conditions for the implementation of this paragraph, including, if they so require, a written undertaking from the approved exporter, that he accepts full responsibility for such statement and declaration as if they had in fact been signed in manuscript by him.13. In the authorizations referred to in paragraphs 2, 3 and 11 the customs authorities shall specify in particular:(a) the conditions under which the applications for EUR. 1 certificates or for LT certificates are made or under which the declaration concerning the origin of the goods is made on the invoice;(b) the conditions under which these applications, as well as a copy of the invoices referring to an LT certificate and of the invoices bearing the exporter's declaration, are kept for at least two years. In the case of LT certificates or invoices referring to an LT certificate, this period shall begin from the date of expiry of validity of the LT certificate. These provisions shall also apply to the EUR. 1 certificates or LT certificates and the invoices referring to anLT certificate, as well as to invoices bearing the exporter's declaration, having served as the basis for the issue of other evidence of origin, used under the conditions laid down in the second subparagraph of Article 9 (3) of this Protocol.14. The customs authorities in the exporting State may declare certain categories of goods ineligible for the special treatment provided for in paragraphs 2, 3 and 11.15. The customs authorities shall refuse the authorizations referred to in paragraphs 2, 3 and 11 to exporters who do not offer all the guarantees which they consider necessary.The customs authorities may withdraw the authorizations at any time. They must do so where the conditions of approval are no longer satisfied or the approved exporter no longer offers those guarantees.16. The approved exporter may be required to inform the customs authorities, in accordance with the rules they lay down, of goods to be dispatched by him,so that the competent customs office may make any verification it thinks necessary before the dispatch of the goods.17. The provisions of this Article shall not prejudice application of the rules of the Community, the Member States and Austria on customs formalities and the use of customs documents.'3. In the first line of Article 14, 'Article 8 (1) (b)' is replaced by 'Article 8 (1) (c)'.4. At the end of Article 15a (3), 'the declaration referred to in Article 8 (1) (b)' is replaced by 'the declarations referred to in Article 8 (1) (b) and (c)'.5. Annex VI is replaced by the Annex to this Decision.Article 2The EUR. 2 forms fulfilling the conditions set out in Article 8 (1) (b) and Article 14 of Protocol 3 to the Agreementbetween the European Economic Community and the Republic of Austria, as in force on 30 June 1987, may continue to be completed and accepted until 30 June 1988.The provisions of Article 17 of the said Protocol concerning subsequent verification shall also apply to the EUR. 2 forms mentioned in the preceding subparagraph.Article 3This Decision shall enter into force on 1 January 1988.Done at Brussels, 13 November 1987.For the Joint CommitteeThe ChairmanG. WAASANNEX 'ANNEX VI Declaration referred to in Article 8 (1) (b) and (c)I, the undersigned, exporter of the goods covered by this document, declare that, except where otherwise indicated (;), the goods meet the conditions required to obtain originating status in preferential tradewith ..................................................................... ($) and that the country of origin of the goods is ...................................................................... ($) (=). .(Place and date).(Signature)(The signature must be followed by the name of the signatory in clear script)(;) When an invoice also includes products not originating in the Community, Austria, Finland, Iceland, Norway, Sweden or Switzerland, the exporter must clearly indicate them.When an invoice also includes products having the status of products originating in Spain within the meaning of Article 24 of the Protocol or in the Canary Islands, Ceuta and Melilla within the meaning of Article 25b of the Protocol, the exporter must clearly indicate them until 31 December 1992 respectively by means of the symbol 'ES' and 'CCM'.($) The Community, Austria, Finland, Iceland, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland.(=) Reference can be made to a specific column of the invoice in which the country of origin of each product is entered.'


text:
 |
 52012PC0224
 Ettepanek: NÕUKOGU MÄÄRUS, millega muudetakse määrust (EÜ) nr 954/2006, millega kehtestatakse lõplik dumpinguvastane tollimaks teatavate Horvaatiast, Rumeeniast, Venemaalt ja Ukrainast pärit rauast või terasest õmblusteta torude impordi suhtes /* COM/2012/0224 final - 2012/0112 (NLE) */
 SELETUSKIRI
 1. Ettepaneku taust
 Ettepaneku põhjused ja eesmärgid
 Ettepanekus käsitletakse kohtuotsuse
 rakendamist, mille Euroopa Liidu Kohus tegi liidetud kohtuasjades C-191/09 P ja
 C-200/09 P: Euroopa Liidu nõukogu versus Interpipe Nikopolsky Seamless Tube
 Plant Niko Tube ZAT ja Interpipe Nizhnedneprovsky Tube Rolling Plant VAT
 (edaspidi „Interpipe” grupp). Euroopa Liidu Kohus kinnitas selle otsusega
 Üldkohtu otsust kohtuasjas T-249/06, mille kohaselt tunnistati kehtetuks
 nõukogu määruse (EÜ) nr 954/2006 artikkel 1 selles osas, mis puudutab Interpipe
 grupi poolt Euroopa Liitu eksporditava toodangu suhtes dumpinguvastase
 tollimaksu kehtestamist eksporthindade alusel, mida oli kohandatud seotud
 kaubandusettevõtja kaudu toimunud müügi komisjonitasudega.
 Üldine taust
 Käesolev ettepanek
 on seotud Euroopa Liidu toimimise lepingu artikliga 266, mille kohaselt
 nõutakse Euroopa Liidu institutsioonidelt, kelle õigusakt on tunnistatud
 kehtetuks, Euroopa Kohtu otsuse täitmiseks vajalike meetmete võtmist.
 Ettepaneku valdkonnas kehtivad
 õigusnormid
 Nõukogu määrus
 (EÜ) nr 954/2006, millega kehtestatakse lõplik dumpinguvastane tollimaks
 teatavate Horvaatiast, Rumeeniast, Venemaalt ja Ukrainast pärit rauast või
 terasest õmblusteta torude impordi suhtes.
 Kooskõla Euroopa Liidu muude
 tegevuspõhimõtete ja eesmärkidega
 Ei kohaldata.
 2. Konsulteerimine huvitatud
 isikutega ja mõju hindamine
 Konsulteerimine huvitatud isikutega
 Rakendamisega seotud huvitatud isikutel on
 juba uurimise ajal olnud võimalus kaitsta oma huve vastavalt korrale, mis on
 sätestatud nõukogu määruses (EÜ) nr 1225/2009 kaitse kohta dumpinguhinnaga
 impordi eest riikidest, mis ei ole Euroopa Ühenduse liikmed (edaspidi
 „algmäärus”).
 Eksperdiarvamuste kogumine ja kasutamine
 Välisekspertide arvamusi ei olnud vaja
 kasutada.
 Mõju hindamine
 Ettepanek tuleneb liidetud kohtuasjades C-191/09P
 ja C-200/09 P tehtud Euroopa Liidu Kohtu otsusest, mis käsitleb algmääruse
 tõlgendamist.
 Algmäärusega ei nähta ette üldist mõju
 hindamist, kuid selles on esitatud põhjalik loetelu tingimustest, mida tuleb
 hinnata.
 3. Ettepaneku õiguslik külg
 Kavandatud meetmete kokkuvõte
 Nõukogu kehtestas määrusega (EÜ) nr 954/2006
 lõpliku dumpinguvastase tollimaksu teatavate Horvaatiast, Rumeeniast, Venemaalt
 ja Ukrainast pärit rauast või terasest õmblusteta torude impordi suhtes.
 Taotluse esitaja, Interpipe grupp, vaidlustas
 määruse (EÜ) nr 954/2006 muu hulgas seoses tema suhtes arvutatud individuaalse
 tollimaksumääraga ja esitas hagi Esimese Astme Kohtule. Esimese Astme Kohus
 tühistas oma 10. märtsi 2009. aasta otsusega määruse (EÜ) nr 954/2006 artikli 1
 selles osas, mille tõttu taotluse esitajate suhtes kehtestatud dumpinguvastane
 tollimaks ületas määra, mida oleks rakendatud, kui ekspordihinda ei oleks
 kohandatud Sepco (taotluse esitajatega seotud kaubandusettevõtte) kaudu
 toimunud müügi komisjonitasuga. Pärast nõukogu ja komisjoni apellatsioonkaebusi
 ning taotluse esitajate vastuapellatsiooni langetas Euroopa Liidu Kohus oma 16.
 veebruari 2012. aasta otsusega lõpliku otsuse, lükates tagasi nii apellatsioonkaebused
 kui ka vastuapellatsiooni ning kinnitades seega Esimese Astme Kohtu (praegu
 Üldkohtu) otsust.
 Otsuse täitmiseks arvutati Interpipe grupi
 suhtes kohaldatav tollimaksumäär uuesti ja saadi teistsugune dumpinguvastane
 tollimaksumäär.
 Seepärast tehakse ettepanek, et nõukogu võtaks
 vastu lisatud määruse ettepaneku, millega muudetakse määrust (EÜ) nr 954/2006.
 Õiguslik alus
 Euroopa Liidu toimimise lepingu artikkel 266.
 Nõukogu 30. novembri 2009. aasta
 määrus (EÜ) nr 1225/2009 kaitse kohta dumpinguhinnaga impordi eest riikidest,
 mis ei ole Euroopa Ühenduse liikmed.
 Subsidiaarsuse põhimõte
 Ettepanek tehakse liidu ainupädevusse kuuluvas
 valdkonnas. Subsidiaarsuse põhimõtet seetõttu ei kohaldata.
 Proportsionaalsuse põhimõte
 Ettepanek on proportsionaalsuse põhimõttega
 kooskõlas järgmistel põhjustel.
 Asjaomase meetme vormi on kirjeldatud eespool
 nimetatud algmääruses ja see ei võimalda teha otsuseid liikmesriikide tasandil.
 Nõuet, mille kohaselt liidu, liikmesriikide
 valitsuste, piirkondlike ja kohalike asutuste, ettevõtjate ja kodanike rahaline
 ja halduskoormus peab olema võimalikult väike ja proportsionaalne ettepaneku
 eesmärgiga, ei kohaldata.
 Vahendi valik
 Kavandatud õigusakt: määrus.
 Muud meetmed ei oleks asjakohased järgmis(t)el
 põhjus(t)el:
 Eelnimetatud algmäärus ei paku alternatiivseid
 võimalusi.
 4. Mõju eelarvele
 Ettepanek mõjutab liidu eelarvet. Muudetud
 dumpinguvastast tollimaksu hakatakse kohaldama tagasiulatuvalt, kusjuures
 hüvitatakse esialgse tollimaksumäära alusel kogutud tollimaksu ja muudetud
 tollimaksumäära alusel kogutava tollimaksu vaheline erinevus. Kokkuvõttes on
 mõju eelarvele hinnanguliselt 3,5 miljonit eurot, täpsemad andmed on esitatud
 õigusaktile lisatud finantsselgituses.
 2012/0112 (NLE)
 Ettepanek:
 NÕUKOGU MÄÄRUS,
 millega muudetakse määrust (EÜ) nr 954/2006,
 millega kehtestatakse lõplik dumpinguvastane tollimaks teatavate Horvaatiast,
 Rumeeniast, Venemaalt ja Ukrainast pärit rauast või terasest õmblusteta torude
 impordi suhtes
 EUROOPA LIIDU NÕUKOGU,
 võttes arvesse Euroopa Liidu toimimise
 lepingut, eelkõige selle artiklit 266,
 võttes arvesse nõukogu 30. novembri 2009. aasta
 määrust (EÜ) nr 1225/2009 kaitse kohta dumpinguhinnaga impordi eest
 riikidest, mis ei ole Euroopa Ühenduse liikmed[1]
 (edaspidi „algmäärus”), eriti selle artikli 9 lõiget 4,
 võttes arvesse Euroopa Komisjoni (edaspidi
 „komisjon”) ettepanekut, mis on esitatud pärast konsulteerimist
 nõuandekomiteega,
 ning arvestades järgmist:
 A. MENETLUS
 (1) Märtsis 2005 algatas komisjon
 uurimise[2]
 seoses teatavate muu hulgas Ukrainast pärit rauast või terasest õmblusteta
 torude impordiga (edaspidi „esialgne uurimine”.) Juunis 2006 kehtestati nõukogu
 määrusega (EÜ) nr 954/2006[3]
 (viimati muudetud nõukogu määrusega (EÜ) nr 812/2008[4]) lõplik dumpinguvastane
 tollimaks. 30. novembril 2007 avaldas komisjon Euroopa Liidu Teatajas teate
 kahe Ukraina eksportiva tootja nimevahetuse kohta[5].
 (2) 8. septembril 2006 esitasid
 Interpipe Nikopolsky Seamless Tubes Plant Niko Tube ja Interpipe
 Nizhnedneprovsky Tube Rolling Plant (edaspidi „Interpipe grupp” või „taotluse
 esitajad”) Euroopa Ühenduste Esimese Astme Kohtule taotluse[6] tühistada nõukogu määrus (EÜ)
 nr 954/2006 neid puudutavas osas.
 (3) Seoses äriühingutega CJSC
 Nikopolosky Seamless Tubes Plant Niko Tube ja OJSC Nizhnedneprovsky Tube Rolling
 Plant tuleb meenutada, et veebruaris 2007 muutusid nende nimed vastavalt CJSC
 Interpipe Nikopolsky Seamless Tubes Plant Niko Tube ja OJSC Interpipe
 Nizhnedneprovsky Tube Rolling Plant[7].
 CJSC Interpipe Nikopolsky Seamless Tubes Plant Niko Tube lakkas juriidilise
 isikuna tegutsemast ning kõik tema varalised ja mittevaralised õigused ja
 kohustused võttis üle detsembris 2007 asutatud LLC Interpipe Niko Tube.
 (4) Esimese Astme Kohus tühistas
 oma 10. märtsi 2009. aasta otsusega[8]
 määruse (EÜ) nr 954/2006 artikli 1 selles osas, mille tõttu taotluse esitajate
 suhtes kehtestatud dumpinguvastane tollimaks ületas määra, mida oleks
 rakendatud, kui ekspordihinda ei oleks kohandatud seotud kaubandusettevõtte
 kaudu toimunud müügi komisjonitasuga.
 (5) Euroopa Liidu nõukogu ja
 komisjon ning samuti taotluse esitajad esitasid Euroopa Liidu Kohtule
 apellatsioonkaebuse, et see tühistaks Esimese Astme Kohtu 10. märtsi 2009.
 aasta otsuse. 16. veebruaril 2012 lükkas Euroopa Kohus tagasi nii
 apellatsioonkaebused kui ka vastuapellatsiooni (edaspidi „kohtuotsus”)[9] ja seega kinnitas Esimese Astme
 Kohtu (praegu Üldkohus) 10. märtsi 2009. aasta otsust.
 (6) Määruse (EÜ) nr 954/2006
 artikkel 1 tühistati seega selles osas, mille tõttu Interpipe grupi toodetud ja
 Euroopa Liitu eksporditud kaupade suhtes kehtestatud dumpinguvastane tollimaks
 ületas määra, mida oleks rakendatud, kui ekspordihinda ei oleks kohandatud
 seotud kaubandusettevõtte kaudu toimunud müügi komisjonitasuga.
 (7) Kohtutes on tunnustamist
 leidnud asjaolu[10],
 et kohtuasjade puhul, mille menetlus koosneb mitmest etapist, ei tähenda ühe
 etapi tühistamine kogu menetluse tühistamist. Dumpinguvastane menetlus on üks
 näide sellisest mitmeetapilisest menetlusest. Sellest tulenevalt ei tähenda
 lõpliku dumpinguvastase määruse mõne osa tühistamine kogu kõnealuse määruse
 vastuvõtmisele eelnenud menetluse tühistamist. Teisalt peavad liidu
 institutsioonid vastavalt Euroopa Liidu toimimise lepingu artiklile 266 täitma
 Euroopa Liidu kohtutes tehtud kohtuotsust. Järelikult on liidu institutsioonidel
 sel viisil kohtuotsust täites võimalik parandada vaidlustatud määruse neid
 aspekte, mis viisid selle tühistamiseni, jättes samal ajal muutmata
 vaidlustamata osad, mida kohtuotsus ei mõjuta[11].
 (8) Käesoleva määruse eesmärk on
 parandada nõukogu määruse (EÜ) nr 954/2006 neid aspekte, mis ei ole kooskõlas
 algmäärusega ja mis seega tingisid kõnealuse määruse osade tühistamise. Nõukogu
 määruses (EÜ) nr 954/2006 esitatud muud järeldused jäävad kehtima.
 (9) Seega arvutati kohtuotsuse
 alusel, kooskõlas Euroopa Liidu toimimise lepingu artikliga 266, Interpipe
 grupi suhtes kohaldatav tollimaksumäär uuesti.
 B. EUROOPA KOHTU OTSUSEL PÕHINEV UUS
 JÄRELDUSTE HINDAMINE
 (10) Käesolevas määruses
 käsitletakse kohtuotsuse seda osa, mis käsitleb dumpingumarginaali arvutamist,
 täpsemalt öeldes ekspordihinna kohandamise arvutamist komisjonitasude
 erinevuste arvesse võtmiseks, kooskõlas algmääruse artikli 2 lõike 10 punktiga
 i.
 (11) Nagu on märgitud nõukogu
 määruse (EÜ) nr 954/2006 põhjendustes 131 ja 134, kohandati kooskõlas
 algmääruse artikli 2 lõike 10 punktiga i ekspordihinda komisjonitasude
 erinevuste arvessevõtmiseks kaubandusettevõtjate kaudu teostatud müügi puhul.
 (12) Esimese Astme Kohus leidis oma
 otsuses, mida kinnitas hiljem ka Euroopa Kohus, et kõnealuses juhtumis ei oleks
 liidu institutsioonid pidanud normaalväärtuse ja ekspordihinna võrdlemisel
 tegema kohandust komisjonitasudega.
 (13) Seepärast arvutati
 dumpingumarginaal uuesti ilma ekspordihinda komisjonitasude erinevustega
 kohandamata.
 (14) Uuesti arvutatud kaalutud
 keskmise ekspordihinna ja esialgse uurimise ajal tuvastatud kaalutud keskmise
 normaalväärtuse võrdlemisel (tooteliikide kaupa, tehasest hankimise tasandil)
 ilmnes dumpingu olemasolu. Kindlaksmääratud dumpingumarginaal väljendatuna
 protsendimäärana CIF-impordihinnast ühenduse piiril ilma tollimakse tasumata
 oli 17,7 %.
 C. TEATAVAKSTEGEMINE
 (15) Kõiki kohtuotsuse
 rakendamisega seotud isikuid teavitati, et on tehtud ettepanek vaadata läbi
 Interpipe grupi suhtes kohaldatavad dumpinguvastased tollimaksumäärad. Neile
 isikutele anti aeg, mille jooksul nad said pärast kõnealust teatavakstegemist
 esitada algmääruse sätetega ettenähtud korras oma märkuseid.
 D. KOKKUVÕTE
 (16) Eespool öeldu põhjal tuleks
 Interpipe grupi suhtes kohaldatavat tollimaksumäära vastavalt muuta. Muudetud
 tollimaksumäärasid tuleb kohaldada tagasiulatuvalt alates määruse (EÜ) nr 954/2006
 jõustumise kuupäevast järgmiselt: tagasimaksmist või vähendamist tuleb taotleda
 liikmesriigi tolliasutuselt kooskõlas kohaldatavate tolliõigusaktidega. Näiteks
 kui tagasimaksmist ja vähendamist taotletakse vastavalt nõukogu määruse (EMÜ) 2913/92
 (millega kehtestatakse ühenduse tolliseadustik) artikli 236 lõikele 2, tuleb
 taotlus üldiselt rahuldada ainult juhul, kui see on esitatud asjakohasele
 tolliasutusele kolme aasta jooksul arvestades kuupäevast, kui selle tollimaksu
 summa võlgnikule teatati. (Näiteks kui tollimaks tasuti kohe pärast määruse
 (EÜ) nr 954/2006 jõustumist ja tagasimakse taotlus esitati kolme aasta piires
 arvestades kuupäevast, kui selle tollimaksu summa võlgnikule teatati, tuleb
 selline taotlus üldjuhul ja kõigi muude tingimuste täitmise korral rahuldada),
 ON VASTU VÕTNUD KÄESOLEVA MÄÄRUSE:
 Artikkel 1
 Äriühinguid CJSC
 Interpipe Nikopolsky Seamless Tubes Plant Niko Tube ja OJSC Interpipe
 Nizhnedneprovsky Tube Rolling Plant käsitlev kanne määruse (EÜ) nr 954/2006
 artikli 1 tabelis asendatakse järgmisega:
 Äriühing || Dumpinguvastane tollimaks || TARICi lisakood
 LLC Interpipe Niko Tube ja OJSC Interpipe Nizhnedneprovsky Tube Rolling Plant (Interpipe NTRP) || 17,7 % || A743
 Artikkel 2
 Eespool öeldu
 põhjal tuleb Interpipe grupi suhtes kohaldatavat tollimaksumäära vastavalt
 muuta. Tagasimaksmist või vähendamist tuleb taotleda kooskõlas kohaldatavate
 tolliõigusaktidega liikmesriigi tolliasutuselt.
 Artikkel 3
 Käesolev määrus
 jõustub järgmisel päeval pärast selle avaldamist Euroopa Liidu Teatajas.
 Käesolev määrus on tervikuna siduv ja
 vahetult kohaldatav kõikides liikmesriikides.
 Brüssel,
 Nõukogu
 nimel
 eesistuja
 [...]
 FINANTSSELGITUS ETTEPANEKUTE KOHTA,
 MILLE MÕJU EELARVELE PIIRDUB AINULT TULUDE POOLEGA
 1. ETTEPANEKU TAUST
 Nõukogu määrus, millega muudetakse määrust (EÜ) nr
 954/2006, millega kehtestatakse lõplik dumpinguvastane tollimaks teatavate
 Horvaatiast, Rumeeniast, Venemaalt ja Ukrainast pärit rauast või terasest
 õmblusteta torude impordi suhtes.
 2. EELARVEREAD
 Peatükk ja artikkel: 120
 Kõnealuseks aastaks
 eelarves ettenähtud summa: 19 171 200 000 EUR
 3. FINANTSMÕJU
 Ettepanekul puudub finantsmõju kuludele, kuid
 sellel on finantsmõju tuludele. Mõju on järgmine:
 miljonites eurodes (üks koht pärast koma)
 || ||
 Eelarverida || Tulud[12] || 2012 || 2013
 Artikkel 120 || Mõju omavahenditele || -2,6 || 0
 4. PETTUSEVASTASED MEETMED
 Ei kohaldata
 5. MUUD MÄRKUSED
 Esimese Astme Kohus tühistas osaliselt määruse
 (EÜ) nr 954/2006 artikli 1, nimelt selles osas, mis puudutas Interpipe gruppi,
 st taotluse esitajaid ehk äriühinguid CJSC Interpipe Nikopolsky Seamless Tubes
 Plant Niko Tube ja OJSC Interpipe Nizhnedneprovsky Tube Rolling Plant. Pärast
 nõukogu ja komisjoni apellatsioonkaebusi ning taotluse esitajate
 vastuapellatsiooni langetas Euroopa Kohus oma 16. veebruari 2012. aasta
 otsusega lõpliku otsuse, lükates tagasi nii apellatsioonkaebused kui ka
 vastuapellatsiooni ning kinnitades seega Esimese Astme Kohtu (praegu Üldkohtu)
 otsust. Selle tulemusena väheneb taotluse esitajate suhtes kohaldatav lõplik
 dumpinguvastane tollimaks 25,1 protsendilt 17,7 protsendini. Uusi
 tollimaksumäärasid tuleks vastavalt kohtuotsusele hakata kohaldama
 tagasiulatuvalt, st dumpinguvastase tollimaksumäära jõustumise kuupäevast, 30.
 juunist 2006.
 Tollimaksu summad, mida on tasutud dumpinguvastase
 meetme rakendamisest kuni 2012. aasta veebruari lõpuni, määrati hinnanguliselt
 kindlaks impordistatistika andmebaasist saadud teabe põhjal.
 Sellest selgub, et tagasimaksmisele kuuluv summa
 ulatuks ligikaudu 3,5 miljoni euroni. Tagasimakseid tuleb taotleda riiklikelt
 tolliasutustelt kooskõlas ühenduse asjakohaste tollialaste õigusaktidega, seega
 sõltub tegelik summa importijate esitatud tagasimaksetaotlustest.
 Eespool kirjeldatu põhjal on lõplik mõju eelarve
 tuludele 2,6 miljonit eurot, st tagasimaksmisele kuuluv summa, millest on maha
 arvatud 25 % sissenõudmiskulusid.
 [1] ELT L 343, 22.12.2009, lk 51.
 [2] ELT C 77, 31.3.2005, lk 2.
 [3] ELT L 175, 29.6.2006, lk 4.
 [4] ELT L 220, 15.8.2008, lk 1.
 [5] ELT C 288, 30.11.2007, lk 34.
 [6] ELT C 261, 28.10.2006, lk 28.
 [7] ELT C 288, 30.11.2007, lk 34.
 [8] Kohtuasi T-249/06: Interpipe Niko Tube ja
 Interpipe NTRP versus nõukogu [2009] II-00383
 [9] ELT C 98, 31.3.2012, lk 2.
 [10] Kohtuasi T-2/95 Industrie des poudres sphériques (IPS) vs. nõukogu [1998]
 EKL II-3939.
 [11] Kohtuasi C-458/98 P IPS vs. nõukogu [2000] ECR I-08147.
 [12] Traditsiooniliste omavahendite (põllumajandussaaduste
 tollimaksud, suhkru- ja tollimaksud) korral peab olema märgitud netosumma, st
 brutosumma pärast 25 % sissenõudmiskulude mahaarvamist.


text:
 28.7.2005
 PL
 Dziennik Urzędowy Unii Europejskiej
 L 198/30
 DECYZJA WSPÓLNEGO KOMITETU EOG NR36/2005
 z dnia 11 marca 2005 r.
 zmieniająca załącznik II (Przepisy techniczne, normy, badania i certyfikacja) do Porozumienia EOG
 WSPÓLNY KOMITET EOG,
 uwzględniając Porozumienie o Europejskim Obszarze Gospodarczym, dostosowane Protokołem dostosowującym Porozumienie o Europejskim Obszarze Gospodarczym, zwane dalej „Porozumieniem”, w szczególności jego art. 98,
 a także mając na uwadze, co następuje:
 (1)
 Załącznik II do Porozumienia został zmieniony decyzją Wspólnego Komitetu EOG nr 9/2005 z dnia 8 lutego 2005 r. (1)
 (2)
 Dyrektywę 2004/12/WE Parlamentu Europejskiego i Rady z dnia 11 lutego 2004 r. zmieniającą dyrektywę 94/62/WE w sprawie opakowań i odpadów opakowaniowych (2) należy włączyć do Porozumienia,
 STANOWI, CO NASTĘPUJE:
 Artykuł 1
 W pkt 7 (dyrektywa 94/62/WE Parlamentu Europejskiego i Rady) rozdziału XVII załącznika II do Porozumienia wprowadza się następujące zmiany:
 1)
 przed ustaleniami przejściowymi dodaje się, co następuje:
 „,zmieniona:
 —
 32004 L 0012: dyrektywą 2004/12/WE Parlamentu Europejskiego i Rady z dnia 11 lutego 2004 r. (Dz.U. L 47 z 18.2.2004, str. 26).”;
 2)
 po ustaleniach przejściowych dodaje się, co następuje:
 „Do celów niniejszego Porozumienia, przepisy dyrektywy należy czytać z następującymi dostosowaniami:
 W art. 6 ust. 7 po słowie ‘Irlandia’ dodaje się słowo ‘,Islandia’, a po słowie ‘górskich’ dodaje się słowa ‘, występowanie obszarów wiejskich i niskiej gęstości zaludnienia’.”
 Artykuł 2
 Teksty dyrektywy 2004/12/WE w języku islandzkim i norweskim, które zostaną opublikowane w dodatku EOG do Dziennika Urzędowego Unii Europejskiej, są autentyczne.
 Artykuł 3
 Decyzja wchodzi w życie z dniem 12 marca 2005 r. pod warunkiem, że wszystkie notyfikacje na mocy art. 103 ust. 1 Porozumienia (3) zostały dokonane wobec Wspólnego Komitetu EOG.
 Artykuł 4
 Niniejsza decyzja zostaje opublikowana w sekcji EOG oraz w dodatku EOG do Dziennika Urzędowego Unii Europejskiej.
 Sporządzono w Brukseli, dnia 11 marca 2005 r.
 W imieniu Wspólnego Komitetu EOG
 Przewodniczący
 R. WRIGHT
 Sekretarze
 Wspólnego Komitetu EOG
 Ø. HOVDKINN
 M. BRINKMANN
 (1) Dz.U. L 161 z 23.6.2005, str. 20.
 (2) Dz.U. L 47 z 18.2.2004, str. 26.
 (3) Nie zgłoszono wymogów konstytucyjnych.