type: caselaw

jurisdiction: US

text:
The accident in this case occurred on Kirk Avenue in Baltimore City, between Bonaparte and Bartlett Streets. Kirk Avenue runs north and south. The plaintiff below (appellant here) on March 16th, 1929, was injured by being struck by the automobile of the defendant (appellee) traveling south on Kirk Avenue. It was a clear day; the bed of the street being dry, surfaced with asphalt, and twenty-six feet wide. The accident occurred on Saturday afternoon about four o'clock. The appellant is a boy who was twelve years and eleven months of age at the time he received the injuries for which damages are sought. At the close of the plaintiff's testimony the defendant offered three prayers asking a directed verdict in his favor, which were refused. The trial proceeded by the introduction of evidence on behalf of the defendant; and at the close of the whole case the defendant offered the following prayer, which was granted: "The court instructs the jury that under the pleadings in this case there is no evidence legally sufficient to entitle the plaintiff to recover, and their verdict must be for the defendant." Under *Page 294
 this instruction the jury found a verdict for the defendant, upon which judgment was entered for the defendant for costs. The appeal which we are considering is from that judgment.
 The evidence of the plaintiff and defendant presents entirely different theories as to how the accident occurred.
 The plaintiff's testimony is that he and another boy were playing with a ball on the west side of Kirk Avenue, a short distance north of an alley, which alley is ninety feet north of Bartlett Street. The boys were throwing a rubber ball against the brick wall of a building on the west side of Kirk Avenue at this point. They were on the sidewalk when the ball rebounded from the wall into the bed of the street and rolled across to the east side; whereupon the plaintiff left the west curb, looked to the north, ran across the street and recovered the ball about one foot from the east curb, then, without looking further, returned towards the west side of the street and was struck by an automobile, belonging to the defendant and which he was driving, about the center of the street. He says that he did not see the defendant's automobile until he was struck on his right side by the right fender of the automobile; that the street was level, and there was a parked automobile on the west side of Kirk Avenue near the point of the collision; that he heard no sounds, neither did he see the automobile before he was hit; that he fell over on the curb on the west side. On cross-examination he testified that when he was struck he was to the west of the center of Kirk Avenue; that when he crossed the street to get the ball, he left the west sidewalk in front of the parked machine; that he looked up Kirk Avenue when he was about three feet from the curb, but did not look after he picked up the ball on the east side and was returning; that if he had looked after picking up the ball, there was nothing to prevent him from seeing. Mrs. Sheehan's house is on the northwest corner of Kirk Avenue and Bartlett Street, and extends north from Bartlett Street to the alley. Edward G. Olert testified that he lived on Bartlett Street, the fifth house from Kirk Avenue; that at the time of the accident he was going down the alley in back of his house leading to Kirk Avenue, and was *Page 295
 at Mrs. Sheehan's back yard; that he saw the plaintiff run across the street with the ball, and saw the machine strike him while he was returning from east to west; that witness did not hear any warning of the approach of the defendant's automobile; that the plaintiff was lying about five feet from the west curb when he first saw him; that he did not hear any brakes applied, and that the defendant's car proceeded between eight and ten feet after striking the plaintiff. This witness also said there was one machine parked on the west side of the street; that, at the time he was struck, the plaintiff was between the defendant's car and the west curb; that the defendant pulled his car to the side before he got out, at which time the defendant's car was "around eight feet" from where he hit the boy.
 Mrs. Lula Olert testified that she was the wife of the preceding witness and an aunt of the plaintiff; that she did not see the accident, but went to the scene almost immediately and saw the defendant "setting Roland down in the alley with his eye and mouth bleeding, his shoe off and limping"; that while she was standing at the scene of the accident Mr. and Mrs. Hoffeld of Stemmers Run came over and tapped her on the shoulder and gave her their names and addresses as witnesses; that the defendant made no statement or explanation of how the accident happened, but did say the boy did not want to go to the hospital. Mrs. Frances Sheehan testified that at the time of the accident she was sitting at her kitchen window looking at the boys playing ball; that she saw the defendant's machine coming south on Kirk Avenue when it was about five hundred feet from the point where the accident occurred; that she does not drive an automobile herself, but has been riding in one for ten years. This witness was then asked: "Q. Do I understand that you saw this automobile from the time you first saw it until it hit the boy? A. Absolutely. Q. Did you see the boy hit? A. I certainly did. Q. Between the time that you first saw the machine and the time when the boy was struck, I would like you to tell the jury whether the machine was going slow or fast or very slow or very fast?" This question was objected to, and *Page 296
 objection sustained. The witness then testified that she saw the defendant's machine continuously from a point five hundred feet from the accident until the plaintiff was struck, and "it was going at a very excessive rate of speed; very fast"; that witness went to the scene of the accident and found the plaintiff lying about five feet from the west curb; that she saw the plaintiff before the accident, standing on the pavement on the west side of Kirk Avenue "playing with the ball up against the wall"; that "the ball bounced in the street and as it struck in the street it run to the east side and Roland after it and I saw Roland after it and he was a little more than half way over Kirk Avenue on the west side when the gentleman in the machine came down and struck the child in the side with the front fender and struck him on the side and rolled him over on the curb stone"; that she did not hear any warning sound of the approach of the automobile. "Q. I want to ask you where was the machine of Mr. Gerst when he pulled it up to the curb, if he did that? A. His machine was across the center of the road and after he struck the child he had to skid, I guess he skid it around ten or twelve feet into the 14-feet alley. Q. You mean he turned into the alley? A. He didn't turn in the alley, he had to come to the west side of the road to stop. Q. Where was he with reference to the alley when he finally stopped his machine? A. How far from the alley? Q. Yes, where was he? A. I judge a foot and a half or two feet from the alley. Q. North or south of the alley? A. North. Q. I want to ask you this, how many stops did his machine (make) before he got out? A. When he skid, he only had one stop to make. Q. He did'nt stop it when he hit the boy and then pull to the curb? A. Impossible, he could not, he was going too fast. Q. After he struck the boy he went to his first stopping place and then got out? A. Absolutely. Q. Did you notice any other cars parked around there at the time of the accident? A. Yes, one. Q. where was that one? A. That was parked on the west side of Kirk Avenue, belonging to the Chesapeake Construction Company or one of the foremen or bosses. Q. Can you tell whether Gerst's machine had passed that one when he struck *Page 297
 Roland? A. Yes, I won't say the rear of his machine cleared it but the front cleared it. Q. So he was a little bit ahead of the parked machine? A. Yes." This witness did not see Hoffeld at the time of the accident. She further testified that the defendant's machine went from twelve to fifteen feet aftr hitting the plaintiff.
 The defendant was driving a Dodge sedan; the other occupant of the car, George Kahl, was on the front seat, to the right of the driver. Jacob Hoffeld testified that he was within fifty feet of the accident when it occurred, was driving north on Kirk Avenue, had passed Bartlett Street, going in the direction of Bonaparte Street, saw the defendant's machine coming south on the opposite side of the street, saw the plaintiff miss the ball that had bounded from the wall on the west side of Kirk Avenue into the bed of the street, whereupon the plaintiff moved backward into the bed of the street, directly in front of the defendant's machine; that the defendant stopped his machine; that when he saw the plaintiff "duck" into the street after the ball, defendant's machine was from seven to ten feet away and to the north; that the point of contact was about seven feet from the west curb of Kirk Avenue; "the boy was backing back to catch the ball, and he missed the ball and went down like this to catch the ball and the machine hit him and threw him over"; "Q. How far did the machine go after it struck the boy? A. About five feet. Q. Did the machine go over the boy? A. No, sir"; that the plaintiff was within his vision from the time he started from the west curb where he was playing on into the street until the accident happened; that he had a clear vision of the boy from fifty to a hundred feet away; that the plaintiff never crossed from the west to the east curb, and never got close to the east curb; that he thinks there were about two machines, "I know two machines, I don't know whether any more," parked up against the curb on the west side of Kirk Avenue, north of the point of contact. Mr. Hoffeld's companion, Mrs. Huston, the defendant and the occupant of his car, all testified that the description given by Hoffeld was how the accident occurred; that the defendant was driving at a *Page 298
 moderate rate of speed south on the west side of Kirk Avenue, on which side there were two or three parked machines; that when he got about opposite the parked machine farthest south, the plaintiff backed off of the pavement in an effort to catch the ball, directly in the path of the defendant's machine; that his right front fender struck the plaintiff and knocked him forward and to the right, close to the west curb; the defendant stopped his car in a distance of from four to six feet and then pulled up to the curb eight or ten feet distant, got out and rendered assistance to the plaintiff; that it was suggested that he go to the hospital, and the plaintiff protested, when shortly the plaintiff's father arrived and the defendant took the plaintiff and his father in his machine and carried them to the hospital.
 From this resume of the testimony it will be seen that the plaintiff's theory of the accident is that he was struck while returning from the east to the west side of Kirk Avenue, while all of the defendant's witnesses insist that he never crossed from the west to the east side, but was struck a few feet from the west side, at the time he was backing off of the pavement in an endeavor to catch the ball. By granting the defendant's prayer at the close of the whole case, the court instructed the jury that there was no evidence legally sufficient to entitle the plaintiff to recover. This prayer was a demurrer to the evidence, and, in considering the court's action upon it, on appeal, we are bound to take the testimony, and all legitimate inferences therefrom, in the most favorable light from the plaintiff's standpoint. When applying this test, we find that the single bit of testimony upon which negligence of the defendant could be predicated is that of the witness Mrs. Sheehan, who said the defendant was driving at an "excessive rate of speed," "very fast," from the time she first saw him five hundred feet north of the point of contact until the plaintiff was struck. This witness was seated in the kitchen of her home, a distance of five hundred feet, when she first saw the defendant's automobile, and from fifty to one hundred feet from the point of the accident. She does not operate an automobile, and does not attempt to give the rate of *Page 299
 speed per hour; and it is impossible from her testimony to say what the speed of the defendant's automobile was, other than that in her opinion it was an excessive rate of speed. Neither is there any evidence as to what she considered "very fast" or "excessive rate of speed." There is no testimony as to the grinding of brakes, or that they were suddenly applied by the defendant; yet the uncontradicted evidence is that the defendant's machine stopped within a very few feet after striking the plaintiff, the plaintiff's witnesses placing the distance at from eight to ten feet, while the defendant's say it was from four to five feet; and that after the plaintiff was struck and knocked forward, the defendant's car was stopped before it reached the point at which the plaintiff lay.
 The question, therefore, is: Was the trial court in error in withdrawing the case from the jury under such circumstances? There is no presumption against a motorist from the mere fact that his car strikes a child, and it must be proved that the driver was negligent. Brune's Automobile Law of Md., sec. 29;Berry on Automobiles, secs. 483-485; Mullikin v. Baltimore,131 Md. 363. In other words, the mere happening of an accident resulting in injury to the plaintiff does not, standing alone, entitle him to damages; but, added to the injury there must be proved some act of negligence on the part of the defendant, shown to be the proximate cause of the injury. Havermale v. Houck,122 Md. 82; Benedick v. Potts, 88 Md. 53; United Rwys. v.Durham, 117 Md. 192; Young Co. v. State, use of Kabat,117 Md. 247; Coughlin v. Blaul, 120 Md. 36. In Schier v. Wehner,116 Md. 554: "It has been frequently said in this State, that the bare fact that an injury has happened, of itself and apart from all surrounding circumstances, cannot authorize an inference that it was caused by negligence. To assume that, is to assume the very fact required to be proven; Joyce v. Flanigan,111 Md. 499; or as was said in the case of B. O.R.R. v. Black,107 Md. 666: `All that is certain is that the plaintiff was injured in some way, and the plaintiff asks that the jury be allowed and in the absence of all explanatory evidence to infer that some act of a negligent character *Page 300
 for which the defendant is responsible caused the injury sustained. No case has gone to that extent, and no known principle can be cited to sustain such a position.'" In other words, the essential requisite for the recovery is some act of negligence on the part of the defendant, either of commission or omission, to which the accident may be directly attributed; and it is necessary that there be some evidence indicative of negligence in the circumstances surrounding an occurrence, either antecedent to or coincident with the happening of the accident occasioning the injury complained of. It is true, as stated, that Mrs. Sheehan testified that the machine of the defendant, which was shown to be a Dodge sedan, was moving at an "excessive rate of speed" when it struck the plaintiff; but in our opinion this is not sufficient, under the circumstances of this case, to require a submission of the question of primary negligence to the jury. The witness was some distance from the point of contact, in her kitchen, on the 16th of March, looking through a window. She has had no experience in driving an automobile, and does not state what in her opinion is an "excessive rate of speed" or "very fast." This evidence of negligence on the part of the defendant is too vague and inconclusive to be made the basis for a jury's verdict, particularly when the physical facts demonstrate that the defendant could not have been traveling at more than a very moderate rate of speed, certainly not above the lawful rate. It is also to be remembered that this accident took place between street intersections at approximately the middle of the block, at which place, under the Code, art. 56, sec. 209, automobiles are given the right of way over pedestrians. It was held by this court in Nelson v. Seiler, 154 Md. 63, that this statute does not prevent the use of the streets by pedestrians, and does not prohibit pedestrians from crossing the street at points other than at street intersections. It does require that between street intersections pedestrians yield the right of way to vehicles. The difference between accidents at and those between regular crossings is that in the latter the rule of ordinary care requires the motorist *Page 301
 to exercise less and the pedestrian more care to avoid injury.
 The plaintiff here is a boy about thirteen years of age, familiar with the neighborhood and the streets of the city; and we think, according to his own testimony, he was guilty of contributory negligence, even assuming that there was negligence on the part of the defendant. He testified that the ball rolled to the east side of Kirk Avenue; that he proceeded to get it, and when starting, about three feet from the west curb, he looked and did not see any automobile approaching; that he went over to the east side of Kirk Avenue, picked up the ball about one foot from the east curb, did not look again, and was struck shortly before he reached the west curb on his return. While the same facts which would constitute contributory negligence on the part of an adult may not necessarily be so in respect to children of tender age, who are not expected or required to exercise a high degree of discretion and judgment, nevertheless, a normal boy of thirteen years of age must be required to exercise such precaution for his own safety as would be ordinarily attributable to one of his age; and this, we think, he failed to do upon re-crossing the street without looking at all. The fact that he looked when he started from the west side is proof that he recognized the responsibility to do so; and yet, according to his own testimony, he utterly failed to observe this precaution when he was returning. What we have said in this regard is upon the theory of the plaintiff's testimony that he was injured while returning to the west side, after having gotten the ball near the east curb. If, on the other hand, the defendant's theory of how the accident occurred is correct, there can be no doubt, upon the authority of Havermale v. Houck, supra, and Sullivan v.Smith, 123 Md. 546, that there is a failure to show any negligence on the part of the defendant, and the plaintiff cannot recover.
 We have examined the exceptions to evidence, and find no reversible error, in the view we have taken of the case.
 Judgment affirmed, with costs to the appellee. *Page 302


type: contracts

jurisdiction: EU

text:
 Avis juridique important
 |
 11992M/PRO/IME/14
 Συνθήκη για την Ευρωπαϊκή Ένωση - Πρωτόκολλο σχετικά με το καταστατικό του Ευρωπαϊκού Νομισματικού Ιδρύματος - Άρθρο 14: Νομική ικανότητα
 Επίσημη Εφημερίδα αριθ. C 191 της 29/07/1992 σ. 0082
 Άρθρο 14 Νομική ικανότητα Το ΕΝΙ, το οποίο σύμφωνα με το άρθρο ?1⁄2? ΣΤ παράγραφος ? της παρούσας συνθήκης έχει νομική προσωπικότητα’ έχει σε κάθε κράτος μέλος την ευρύτερη νομική ικανότητα που αναγνωρίζεται σε νομικά πρόσωπα από το δίκαιο του κράτους μέλους? Το ΕΝΙ μπορεί ιδίως να αποκτά ή να διαθέτει κινητή ή ακίνητη περιουσία και να είναι διάδικος.


text:
 30.5.2022
 GA
 Iris Oifigiúil an Aontais Eorpaigh
 C 213/36
 Breithiúnas na Cúirte Ginearálta an 30 Márta 2022 – Daimler v EUIPO (Léiriú ar réalta thrírinneach ar chúlra dubh IV)
 (Cás T-279/21) (1)
 (Trádmharc de chuid an Aontais Eorpaigh - Iarratas ar phatrúnmharc de chuid an Aontais Eorpaigh - Léiriú ar réalta thrírinneach ar chúlra dubh IV - Dearbhfhoras le diúltú - Easpa leithleachais - Airteagal 7(1)(b) de Rialachán (AE) 2017/1001)
 (2022/C 213/51)
 Teanga an cháis: an Ghearmáinis
 Páirtithe
 Iarratasóir: Daimler AG (Stuttgart, an Ghearmáin) (ionadaí: N. Siebertz, Dlíodóir)
 Cosantóir: Oifig Maoine Intleachtúla an Aontais Eorpaigh (ionadaithe: J. Schäfer agus E. Markakis, Gníomhairí)
 Maidir le:
 Caingean arna tabhairt i gcoinne chinneadh an chúigiú Bord Achomhairc de EUIPO an 18 Márta 2021 (Cás R 1895/2020 – 5) maidir le hiarratas ar chlárú patrúnmhairc lena léirítear réalta thrírinneach ar chúlra dubh IV mar thrádmharc de chuid an Aontais Eorpaigh.
 An chuid oibríochtúil
 1.
 Diúltaítear don chaingean.
 2.
 Ordaítear do Daimler AG na costais a íoc.
 (1) IO C 278, 12.7.2021.


type: wikipedia

text:
Ο Άνουβις -όπως μεταγράφηκε στα ελληνικά η αιγυπτιακή λέξη Inpou (Anpou)- ταυτίστηκε με τον ψυχοπομπό Ερμή. Σύμφωνα με τις πεποιθήσεις των αρχαίων Αιγυπτίων, άνοιγε το δρόμο του άλλου κόσμου για χάρη των νεκρών. Απεικονιζόταν ως μαύρος θως (τσακάλι) με χοντρή ουρά, ή ως μελαμψός άνδρας με κεφαλή τσακαλιού ή σκύλου, ιερού τοτεμικού ζώου του Ανούβιδος. Αυτός είναι άλλωστε και ο λόγος για τον οποίο οι αρχαίοι Έλληνες είχαν δώσει στη μητρόπολη της λατρείας του το όνομα Κυνόπολις και ταυτίζεται με τον σκύλο φύλακα Κέρβερο της ελληνικής μυθολογίας
 Ο μύθος της γέννησης
 Είναι η θεότητα που προΐστατο της ταρίχευσης και της νεκρώσιμης τελετουργίας. Στα κείμενα των Πυραμίδων, ο Άνουβις χαρακτηρίζεται τέταρτος γιος του Ρα και κατονομάζεται επίσης ως κόρη του Κεμπεχούτ (Qebehout) ή "θεά δρόσος". Αργότερα εισήλθε στην οικογένεια του Οσίριδος, καθώς σύμφωνα με τον μύθο η Νέφθυς, που είχε μείνει άτεκνη από τον σύζυγό της τον Σετ, τον γέννησε διαπράττοντας μοιχεία με τον αδελφό της τον Όσιρι.
 Εγκατελειμένος από τη μητέρα του, μόλις γεννήθηκε, τέθηκε υπό την προστασία της Ίσιδας, η οποία ανέλαβε την ανατροφή του. Όταν μεγάλωσε, έλαβε μέρος στην εκστρατεία του Οσίριδος για την κατάκτηση του κόσμου. Όταν εκείνος δολοφονήθηκε μετά την επιστροφή του κατόπιν διαταγής του Ρα (Ρε) βοήθησε την Ίσιδα και τη Νέφθυ να τον θάψουν. Ο Άνουβις διαμόρφωσε το τυπικό της επικήδειας τελετουργίας και εκτέλεσε τη μουμιοποίηση του θεού, για να τον προφυλάξει από την επαφή με τον αέρα και να παρεμποδίσει τη σήψη του. Από τούτη τη διαδικασία κέρδισε και το προσωνύμιο «Κύριος των επιδέσμων».
 Ο Κύριος των Νεκρών
 Από τότε ο Άνουβις συνδέθηκε με τις ταφικές τελετουργίες και απεικονίζονταν συνήθως ως ταριχευτής της μούμιας του νεκρού, την οποία υποδέχονταν στην πύλη του τάφου, για να της παραδώσει τις προσφορές που κατέθεταν οι κληρονόμοι της. Στη συνέχεια απεικονίζεται να κρατά τον νεκρό από το χέρι και με την ιδιότητα του φύλακα του ανακτόρου του Οσίριδος να τον οδηγεί προς την Αίθουσα της Κρίσης, για το ζύγισμα της ψυχής του.
 Η λατρεία του Ανούβιδος, χάρις στο ρόλο του ως θεού των νεκρών, έγινε καθολικά
 αποδεκτή, ενώ η είσοδός του στον κεντρικό μύθο του Οσίριδος συνέτεινε στη μακρόχρονη διάρκεια της λατρείας του μέχρι τους νεότερους χρόνους, οπότε και ταυτίστηκε εντελώς με τον ψυχοπομπό Ερμή, επονομαζόμενος Ερμάνουβις. Στη μεγάλη, προς τιμήν της Ίσιδας λιτανεία, την οποία περιγράφει ο Απουλήιος, ο κυνοκέφαλος θεός φέρεται να βαδίζει προς τις εικόνες των θεών, κρατώντας στο χέρι το κηρυκείο και τους φοίνικες.
 Συλλογή
 Δείτε επίσης
 Αφρικανικός χρυσός λύκος
 Θεότητες της αιγυπτιακής μυθολογίας
 Θεότητες του θανάτου
 Θεότητες του Κάτω Κόσμου
 Μυθολογικά κυνοειδή


text:
 11.7.2008
 SK
 Úradný vestník Európskej únie
 L 183/41
 Právne účinky podľa medzinárodného práva verejného majú len originálne texty EHK OSN. Status tohto predpisu a dátum nadobudnutia jeho platnosti je potrebné overiť v poslednom znení dokumentu EHK OSN o statuse TRANS/WP.29/343, ktorý je k dispozícii na internetovej stránke: http://www.unece.org/trans/main/wp29/wp29wgs/wp29gen/wp29fdocstts.html
 Predpis Európskej hospodárskej komisie Organizácie Spojených národov (EHK OSN) č. 54 – Jednotné ustanovenia o homologizácii pneumatík pre úžitkové vozidlá a ich prípojné vozidlá
 Zahŕňa celý platný text vrátane:
 doplnku 16 k pôvodnej verzii predpisu – dátum nadobudnutia platnosti: 13. novembra 2004
 OBSAH
 PREDPIS
 1.
 Rozsah pôsobnosti
 2.
 Definície
 3.
 Označenia
 4.
 Žiadosť o homologizáciu
 5.
 Homologizácia
 6.
 Špecifikácie
 7.
 Zmena a rozšírenie homologizácie vozidla
 8.
 Zhoda výroby
 9.
 Sankcie za nedodržanie zhody výroby
 10.
 Definitívne zastavenie výroby
 11.
 Názvy a adresy technických skúšobní zodpovedných za vykonávanie skúšok typového schvaľovania a názvy a adresy správnych orgánov
 PRÍLOHY
 Príloha č. I
 Oznámenie o udelení, rozšírení, odmietnutí, odobratí alebo ukončení výroby typu pneumatiky pre motorové vozidlá podľa predpisu č. 54
 Príloha č. II
 Usporiadanie homologizačnej značky
 Príloha č. III
 Usporiadanie označenia na pneumatike
 Príloha č. IV
 Zoznam symbolov indexov nosnosti
 Príloha č. V
 Označenie rozmeru pneumatík a rozmery: Časť I – Európske pneumatiky; Časť II – Americké pneumatiky
 Príloha č. VI
 Metóda merania pneumatík
 Príloha č. VII
 Postup pri vykonávaní zaťažovacích/rýchlostných únavových skúšok
 Doplnok 1
 Program únavových skúšok
 Doplnok 2
 Vzťah medzi indexom tlaku a jednotkami tlaku
 Príloha č. VIII
 Zmena nosnosti v závislosti od rýchlosti radiálnych a diagonálnych pneumatík pre úžitkové vozidlá
 Príloha č. IX
 OZNÁMENIE, zvýšenie parametrov prevádzkového popisu na účely obnovenia v súlade s predpisom č. 109
 1. ROZSAH PÔSOBNOSTI
 Tento predpis platí pre nové pneumatiky určené predovšetkým, ale nielen, pre vozidlá kategórií M2, M3, N a O3 a O4
 (1). Neplatí však pre pneumatiky typu určeného symbolmi rýchlostnej kategórie zodpovedajúcimi rýchlostiam pod 80 km/h.
 2. DEFINÍCIE
 Na účely tohto predpisu:
 2.1.
 „typ pneumatiky“ je kategória pneumatík, ktoré sa vzájomne podstatne nelíšia, pokiaľ ide o:
 2.1.1.
 výrobcu;
 2.1.2.
 označenie rozmeru pneumatiky;
 2.1.3.
 kategóriu použitia;
 2.1.4.
 štruktúru [diagonálne pneumatiky (bias-ply); radiálne];
 2.1.5.
 rýchlostnú kategóriu;
 2.1.6.
 indexy nosnosti: a
 2.1.7.
 priečny prierez pneumatiky;
 2.2.
 Kategória použitia:
 2.2.1.
 „normálna pneumatika“ je pneumatika určená na bežnú, každodennú cestnú premávku;
 2.2.2.
 „pneumatika na špeciálne použitie“ je pneumatika určená na cestnú aj terénnu premávku a iné špeciálne účely.
 2.2.3.
 „pneumatika na jazdu na snehu“ je pneumatika, ktorej vzor, zloženie alebo štruktúra behúňa sú skonštruované tak, aby dosiahla na snehu lepší výkon ako normálna pneumatika z hľadiska schopnosti viesť alebo udržiavať pohyb vozidla.
 2.3.
 „konštrukcia pneumatiky“ sú technické vlastnosti kostry plášťa pneumatiky. Rozlišujú sa najmä tieto typy konštrukcií:
 2.3.1.
 „diagonálna“ alebo „bias-ply“ konštrukcia pneumatiky je konštrukcia, pri ktorej kordové vrstvy siahajú až k pätke a sú usporiadané tak, že tvoria striedavo uhly oveľa menšie ako 90° vzhľadom k stredovej osi behúňa;
 2.3.2.
 „radiálna“ konštrukcia pneumatiky je konštrukcia, pri ktorej kordové vrstvy siahajú až k pätke a sú usporiadané tak, že tvoria uhol takmer rovný 90° vzhľadom k stredovej osi behúňa, pričom kostra je stabilizovaná v podstate neroztiahnuteľným obvodovým pásom.
 2.4.
 „pätka“ je časť pneumatiky, ktorej tvar a štruktúra jej dovoľujú prispôsobiť sa ráfiku a udržovať na ňom pneumatiku (2);
 2.5.
 „kord“ sú vlákna tvoriace tkanivo vrstiev v pneumatike (2);
 2.6.
 „vrstva“ je vrstva rovnobežne usporiadaných pogumovaných kordových vlákien (2);
 2.7.
 „kostra“ je časť pneumatiky, iná ako behúň a gumové bočnice, ktorá po nahustení nesie zaťaženie (2);
 2.8.
 „behúň“ je časť pneumatiky určená na styk s povrchom, ktorá chráni kostru proti mechanickému poškodeniu a prispieva k zabezpečeniu adhézie s povrchom (2);
 2.9.
 „bočnica“ je časť pneumatiky medzi behúňom a plochou, ktorá má byť prekrytá okrajom ráfika (2);
 2.10.
 „spodok bočnice“ je plocha medzi najväčšou šírkou profilu pneumatiky a plochou, ktorá má byť prekrytá okrajom ráfika (2);
 2.10.1.
 V prípade pneumatík označených symbolom „A“„konfigurácia montáže pneumatiky na ráfik“ (pozri bod 3.1.11.) však spodkom bočnice sa rozumie plocha pneumatiky, ktorá spočíva na ráfiku.
 2.11.
 „Drážka behúňa“ je priestor medzi dvomi susednými rebrami a/alebo blokmi vzorky behúňa (2);
 2.12.
 „šírka profilu (S)“ je lineárna vzdialenosť medzi vonkajšími okrajmi bočníc nahustenej pneumatiky, okrem nerovnosti vytvárané označením, zdobením alebo ochrannými pásmi alebo rebrami (2);
 2.13.
 „celková šírka“ je lineárna vzdialenosť medzi vonkajšími okrajmi bočníc nahustenej pneumatiky vrátane označení, zdobenia ochranných pásov alebo rebier (2);
 2.14.
 „výška profilu (H)“ je vzdialenosť rovnajúca sa polovici rozdielu medzi vonkajším priemerom pneumatiky a menovitým priemerom ráfika;
 2.15.
 „menovité profilové číslo (Ra)“ je stonásobok čísla získaného delením čísla vyjadrujúceho výšku profilu (H) číslom vyjadrujúcim menovitú šírku profilu (S1), pričom obidva rozmery sú vyjadrené v tých istých jednotkách;
 2.16.
 „vonkajší priemer (D)“ znamená celkový priemer nahustenej novej pneumatiky (2);
 2.17.
 „označenie rozmeru plášťa“ je:
 2.17.1.
 označenie vyjadrujúce:
 2.17.1.1.
 menovitú šírku profilu (S1). Táto šírka musí byť vyjadrená v mm, s výnimkou typov pneumatík, ktorých označenie rozmeru je uvedené v prvom stĺpci tabuliek v prílohe 5 k tomuto predpisu;
 2.17.1.2.
 menovité profilové číslo, s výnimkou niektorých typov pneumatík, ktorých označenie rozmeru je uvedené v prvom stĺpci tabuliek v prílohe V k tomuto predpisu alebo podľa konštrukčného typu pneumatiky, menovitý vonkajší priemer vyjadrený v mm;
 2.17.1.3.
 zmluvné číslo „d“ (symbol „d“) označujúce menovitý priemer ráfiku a zodpovedajúce jeho priemeru vyjadrené buď ako zmluvná hodnota – kód (čísla menšie ako 100) alebo v milimetroch (čísla väčšie ako 100). Čísla zodpovedajúce obom spôsobom merania môžu byť v označení použité spoločne;
 2.17.1.3.1.
 hodnoty symbolov „d“, vyjadrené v milimetroch sú uvedené v nasledujúcej tabuľke:
 Kód menovitého priemeru ráfika (symbol „d“)
 Hodnota symbolu „d“ vyjadrená v mm
 8
 203
 9
 229
 10
 254
 11
 279
 12
 305
 13
 330
 14
 356
 15
 381
 16
 406
 17
 432
 18
 457
 19
 482
 20
 508
 21
 533
 22
 559
 24
 610
 25
 635
 14,5
 368
 16,5
 419
 17,5
 445
 19,5
 495
 20,5
 521
 22,5
 572
 24,5
 622
 26
 660
 28
 711
 30
 762
 2.17.1.4.
 Označenie konfigurácie montáže pneumatiky na ráfik, ak sa líši od štandardnej výbavy a nie je už vyjadrené symbolom „d“ označujúcim kód menovitého priemeru ráfiku.
 2.18.
 „Menovitý priemer ráfiku (d)“ je priemer ráfiku, na ktorý sa má pneumatika namontovať (2);
 2.19.
 „ráfik“ je nosný prvok pre súpravu plášťa a duše alebo pre bezdušovú pneumatiku, o ktorú sa opierajú pätky plášťa (2);
 2.20.
 „teoretický ráfik“ je ráfik, ktorého šírka by sa rovnala x-násobku menovitej šírky profilu pneumatiky; hodnotu „x“ musí stanoviť výrobca typu pneumatiky;
 2.21.
 „merací ráfik“ je ráfik, na ktorý sa musí namontovať pneumatika z dôvodu merania rozmerov;
 2.22.
 „skúšobný ráfik“ je ráfik, na ktorý sa musí namontovať pneumatika z dôvodu vykonania zaťažovacích/rýchlostných únavových skúšok;
 2.23.
 „vytrhávanie“ je oddeľovanie kúskov gumy z behúňa;
 2.24.
 „oddeľovanie kordu“ je oddeľovanie kordu od jeho gumového obalu;
 2.25.
 „oddeľovanie vrstiev“ je oddeľovanie susedných vrstiev od seba;
 2.26.
 „oddeľovanie behúňa“ je oddeľovanie behúňa od kostry;
 2.27.
 „index nosnosti“ sú jedna alebo dve číslice udávajúce zaťaženie, ktoré znesie pneumatika pri jednoduchej alebo dvojitej montáži pri rýchlosti zodpovedajúcej rýchlostnej kategórii, do ktorej pneumatika patrí, ak je používaná podľa predpisov na používanie stanovených jej výrobcom. Ten istý typ pneumatiky môže mať buď jeden alebo dva rady indexov nosnosti podľa toho, či bolo použité ustanovenie bodu 6.2.5. alebo nie. Zoznam týchto indexov a príslušných hodnôt zaťaženia je uvedený v prílohe IV;
 2.28.
 „kategória rýchlosti“ znamená:
 2.28.1.
 rýchlosti, označované symbolom, pri ktorých pneumatika znesie zaťaženie zodpovedajúce priradenému indexu nosnosti;
 2.28.2.
 kategórie rýchlosti sú uvedené v nasledujúcej tabuľke (3):
 Symbol rýchlostnej kategórie
 Zodpovedajúca rýchlosť (km/h)
 F
 80
 G
 90
 J
 100
 K
 110
 L
 120
 M
 130
 N
 140
 P
 150
 Q
 160
 R
 170
 S
 180
 T
 190
 U
 200
 H
 210
 2.29.
 „Tabuľka zmien nosnosti v závislosti od rýchlosti“ je:
 tabuľka v prílohe VIII udávajúca, v závislosti od indexov nosnosti a symbolov menovitej rýchlostnej kategórie zmeny zaťaženia, ktoré znesie pneumatika, ak je používaná pri rýchlostiach odlišných od rýchlosti zodpovedajúcej jej symbolu menovitej rýchlostnej kategórie. Tieto zmeny zaťaženia neplatia pri zvýšených indexoch nosnosti a rýchlostných kategóriách, dosahovaných pri uplatnení ustanovení bodu 6.2.5.
 3. OZNAČOVANIE
 3.1. Pneumatiky, predkladané na homologizáciu, musia byť pri súmerných plášťoch na oboch bočniciach a pri nesúmerných plášťoch aspoň na vonkajšej bočnici vybavené:
 3.1.1.
 názvom alebo obchodnou značkou výrobcu;
 3.1.2.
 označením rozmeru pneumatiky, definované v bode 2.17. tohto predpisu;
 3.1.3.
 označením konštrukcie týmto spôsobom:
 3.1.3.1.
 na diagonálnych (bias-ply) pneumatikách: bez označenia alebo písmenom „D“;
 3.1.3.2.
 na radiálnych pneumatikách: písmenom „R“, umiestneným pred označením priemeru ráfiku, prípadne slovom „RADIAL“;
 3.1.4.
 symbolom (alebo symbolmi) rýchlostnej kategórie;
 3.1.4.1.
 označením menovitej kategórie rýchlosti, do ktorej patrí pneumatika, v podobe symbolu predpísaného v bode 2.28.2. vyššie;
 3.1.4.2.
 označením druhej rýchlostnej kategórie, ak sa použije ustanovenie bodu 6.2.5.;
 3.1.5.
 nápisom M+S alebo M.S alebo M&S v prípade pneumatiky na jazdu na snehu;
 3.1.6.
 indexmi nosnosti ako je definované v bode 2.27. tohto predpisu;
 3.1.7.
 slovom „TUBELESS“, ak ide o bezdušovú pneumatiku;
 3.1.8.
 dátumom výroby v podobe skupiny štyroch číslic, z ktorých prvé dve udávajú týždeň a ďalšie dve číslice rok výroby. Toto označenie, ktoré stačí umiestniť na jednu z bočníc, bude však pri všetkých pneumatikách, predkladaných na homologizáciu, povinné až po dvoch rokoch odo dňa, kedy tento predpis vstúpil do platnosti (4);
 3.1.9.
 v prípade plášťov pneumatík, spôsobilých na obnovenie vzorky behúňa prerezávaním, na obidvoch bočniciach symbolom „
 “ s priemerom najmenej 20 mm alebo slovom „REGROOVABLE“, vylisovaným zahĺbením alebo v reliéfe na každú stranu bočnice;
 3.1.10.
 vyznačením hustiaceho tlaku, ktorý treba použiť pre zaťažovacie/rýchlostné únavové skúšky, označením indexu „PSI“, ktorého vysvetlenie je uvedené v prílohe VII, doplnku 2. Toto označenie, ktoré postačí umiestniť na jednu z bočníc, bude však vo všetkých pneumatikách, predložených na homologizáciu, povinné až po dvoch rokoch odo dňa, kedy tento predpis vstúpil do platnosti.
 3.1.11.
 V prípade pneumatík homologizovaných prvýkrát po 1. marci 2004 sa označenie uvedené v bode 2.17.1.4. umiestni len bezprostredne za označenie priemeru ráfika uvedené v bode 2.17.1.3.
 3.1.12.
 Nápisom „ET“ alebo „ML“ alebo „MPT“ pre „pneumatiky na špeciálne použitie“ (5).
 3.1.13.
 Príponou „C“ alebo „LT“ po označení priemeru ráfika podľa bodu 2.17.1.3. a prípadne za konfiguráciou montáže pneumatiky na ráfik podľa bodu 2.17.1.4.:
 3.1.13.1.
 toto označenie je nepovinné pre pneumatiky montované na ráfiky s úkosom 5° vhodné na samostatnú i dvojitú montáž s indexom nosnosti samostatne nižším alebo rovnajúcim sa 121 a určené pre motorové vozidlá.
 3.1.13.2.
 Toto označenie je povinné pre pneumatiky montované na ráfiky s úkosom 5 ° vhodné len na samostatnú montáž s indexom nosnosti vyšším alebo rovnajúcim sa 122 a určené pre motorové vozidlá.
 3.1.14.
 Príponou „CP“ po označení priemeru ráfika podľa bodu 2.17.1.3. a prípadne za konfiguráciou montáže pneumatiky na ráfik podľa bodu 2.17.1.4. Toto označenie je povinné pre pneumatiky montované na ráfiky s úkosom 5° s indexom nosnosti v prípade samostatnej montáže nižším alebo rovnajúcim sa 121 a určené špeciálne pre motorové karavany.
 3.1.15.
 Nápisom „FRT“ (voľne sa otáčajúca pneumatika – free rolling tyre) v prípade pneumatík určených na vybavenie náprav prívesov a náprav motorových vozidiel okrem predných riadených náprav a hnacích náprav.
 3.2. Na plášťoch musí byť dostatočne veľké miesto pre homologizačnú značku, ako je uvedené v prílohe II tohto predpisu.
 3.3. V prílohe III k tomuto predpisu sú uvedené príklady usporiadania označení pneumatiky.
 3.4. Označenia uvedené v bode 3.1., a homologizačná značka, predpísaná v bode 5.4. tohto predpisu, musia byť na plášťoch vylisované v reliéfe alebo zahĺbením. Musia byť dobre čitateľné a umiestnené na spodnej časti najmenej jednej z bočníc, s výnimkou označenia uvedeného v bode 3.1.1.
 3.4.1. V prípade pneumatík označených symbolom „A“„konfigurácia montáže pneumatiky na ráfik“ (pozri bod 3.1.11.) však môže byť označenie umiestnené kdekoľvek na bočnici pneumatiky.
 4. ŽIADOSŤ O HOMOLOGIZÁCIU
 4.1. Žiadosť o homologizáciu typu pneumatiky musí predložiť držiteľ názvu alebo obchodnej značky alebo ním riadne splnomocnený zástupca. Musí obsahovať tieto údaje:
 4.1.1.
 označenie rozmeru pneumatiky, definované v bode 2.17. tohto predpisu;
 4.1.2.
 názov alebo obchodná značka výrobcu;
 4.1.3.
 kategóriu použitia (normálne alebo špeciálne alebo na jazdu na snehu);
 4.1.4.
 konštrukcia: diagonálnu (bias-ply) alebo radiálnu;
 4.1.5.
 rýchlostnú kategóriu;
 4.1.6.
 indexy nosnosti;
 4.1.7.
 či je plášť určený na použitie s dušou alebo bez duše;
 4.1.8.
 celkové rozmery: celková šírka profilu a vonkajší priemer;
 4.1.9.
 súčiniteľ „x“, uvedený v bode 2.20. vyššie;
 4.1.10.
 ráfiky, na ktoré je možné pneumatiku montovať;
 4.1.11.
 merací ráfik a skúšobný ráfik;
 4.1.12.
 merací tlak a index zodpovedajúci hustiacemu tlaku použitému pre skúšku;
 4.1.13.
 dodatočné kombinácie zaťažení a rýchlostí, ak sa použije ustanovenie bodu 6.2.5.
 4.2. Žiadosť o homologizáciu musí byť doložená (všetko v trojitom vyhotovení) výkresom alebo zodpovedajúcou fotografiou, ktorá identifikuje dezén pneumatiky a výkres obalovej krivky nahustenej pneumatiky namontovanej na skúšobný ráfik zobrazujúci príslušné rozmery (pozri body 6.1.1. a 6.1.2.) typu predloženého na homologizáciu. Musí byť tiež doložená buď skúšobným protokolom vydaným skúšobným laboratóriom alebo jednou alebo dvomi vzorkami typu pneumatiky vybranými príslušným orgánom. Výkresy alebo fotografie bočníc a behúňa pneumatiky musia byť predložené po zahájení výroby, najneskôr jeden rok po dátume schválenia homologizácie.
 4.3. Príslušný orgán overí existenciu dostatočných opatrení na zabezpečenie účinnej kontroly zhody sériovej výroby pred udelením homologizácie.
 4.4. Ak výrobca pneumatík predloží žiadosť na homologizáciu viacerých typov pneumatík, nie je nutné vykonať zaťažovaciu/rýchlostnú skúšku pre všetky typy rozmerového radu pneumatík. Homologizačný orgán môže podľa uváženia vykonať výber najhoršieho prípadu.
 5. HOMOLOGIZÁCIA
 5.1. Ak splní typ pneumatiky, predložený na homologizáciu podľa tohto predpisu požiadavky nižšie uvedeného bodu 6, udelí sa tomuto typu pneumatiky homologizácia.
 5.2. Každému homologizovanému typu sa pridelí homologizačné číslo; jeho prvé dve číslice (v súčasnej dobe 00 pre predpis v jeho pôvodnom znení) musia označovať sériu zmien zahrňujúcu najnovšie podstatné technické zmeny, vykonané v predpise v dobe vydania homologizácie. Tá istá zmluvná strana nesmie to isté číslo prideliť inému typu pneumatiky.
 5.3. Homologizácia alebo odmietnutie homologizácie typu pneumatiky podľa tohto predpisu sa musí oznámiť stranám dohody, ktoré uplatňujú tento predpis, na formulári podľa vzoru uvedeného v prílohe I k tomuto predpisu.
 5.4. Na každú pneumatiku, zhodnú s typom homologizovaným podľa tohto predpisu, sa musí na viditeľnom mieste, uvedenom v bode 3.2., okrem označenia predpísaného v bode 3.1., umiestniť medzinárodná homologizačná značka skladajúca sa z:
 5.4.1.
 písmena „E“ v kruhu, za ktorým nasleduje rozlišovacie číslo krajiny, ktorá schválenie udelila (6);
 5.4.2.
 homologizačného čísla.
 5.5. Homologizačná značka musí byť dobre čitateľná a nezmazateľná.
 5.6. V prílohe II k tomuto predpisu je uvedený príklad usporiadania homologizačnej značky.
 5.7. Následné obnovovanie pneumatík v súlade s predpisom č. 109.
 V prípade, že počas výroby určitého typu pneumatiky obdržal výrobca novú homologizáciu pre ten istý typ pneumatiky, ktorý má byť označený prevádzkovým popisom uvádzajúcim vyšší index nosnosti alebo odlišný rýchlostný symbol ako staršie označenie a kde výrobca pneumatiky povoľuje, aby bol starší typ pneumatiky obnovený a označený novým prevádzkovým popisom, výrobca pneumatiky vyplní formulár oznámenia poskytnutom v prílohe IX k tomuto predpisu a predkladá ho homologizačnému orgánu, ktorý vydal novú homologizáciu. Ak sa povolenie na aktualizáciu týka len pneumatík z určitého výrobného závodu alebo vyrobených počas určitých výrobných období, uvedú sa vo formulári oznámenia informácie potrebné na identifikáciu týchto pneumatík.
 Homologizačný orgán poskytne tieto informácie ostatným stranám dohody, ktoré uplatňujú tento predpis a výrobcovia pneumatík alebo homologizačné orgány poskytnú tieto informácie na žiadosť ktorejkoľvek výrobnej jednotky na obnovovanie pneumatík, ktorá je homologizovaná v súlade s predpisom č. 109.
 6. TECHNICKÉ POŽIADAVKY
 6.1. Rozmery pneumatík
 6.1.1. Šírka profilu pneumatiky
 6.1.1.1. Šírka profilu sa vypočíta pomocou nasledujúceho vzorca:
 S = S1 + K (A - A1),
 kde:
 S
 =
 je „šírka profilu“, vyjadrená v milimetroch a nameraná na meracom ráfiku;
 S1
 =
 je „menovitá šírka profilu“ v milimetroch, vyznačená na bočnici plášťa v jeho predpísanom označení;
 A
 =
 je šírka meracieho ráfiku v milimetroch, uvedená výrobcom v popise; a
 A1
 =
 je šírka teoretického ráfika v milimetroch.
 A1 sa rovná hodnote S1 vynásobenej súčiniteľom x, stanoveným výrobcom, a K sa rovná hodnote 0,4.
 6.1.1.2. Pri doterajších typoch pneumatík, ktorých označenie je uvedené v prvom stĺpci tabuliek v prílohe V k tomuto predpisu, sa však za šírku profilu považuje údaj uvedený v týchto tabuľkách oproti označeniu pneumatiky.
 6.1.1.3. V prípade pneumatík označených symbolom „A“„konfigurácia montáže pneumatiky na ráfik“ (pozri bod 3.1.11.) sa však K rovná 0,6.
 6.1.2. Vonkajší priemer pneumatiky
 6.1.2.1. Vonkajší priemer pneumatiky sa musí získať pomocou vzorca:
 D = d + 2H
 kde:
 D
 je vonkajší priemer vyjadrený v milimetroch;
 d
 je dohodnuté číslo, definované v bode 2.17.1.3. vyjadrené v milimetroch;
 S1
 je menovitá šírka profilu v milimetroch;
 Ra
 je menovité profilové číslo;
 H
 je menovitá výška profilu v milimetroch a je rovná S1 x 0,01 Ra.
 Všetko ako je uvedené na bočnici pneumatiky v jej označení podľa ustanovení bodu 3.4. vyššie.
 6.1.2.2. Pri doterajších typoch pneumatík, ktorých označenie je uvedené v prvom stĺpci tabuliek v prílohe V k tomuto predpisu, sa však za vonkajší priemer považuje údaj uvedený v týchto tabuľkách oproti označeniu pneumatiky.
 6.1.2.3. V prípade pneumatík označených symbolom „A“„konfigurácia montáže pneumatiky na ráfik“ (pozri bod 3.1.11.) je však vonkajší priemer ten, ktorý je špecifikovaný v označení rozmeru pneumatiky, uvedenom na bočnici pneumatiky.
 6.1.3. Spôsob merania pneumatík
 Rozmery pneumatík sa musia merať postupom opísaným v prílohe VI k tomuto predpisu.
 6.1.4. Šírka profilu pneumatiky:
 6.1.4.1. Celková šírka pneumatiky môže byť menšia ako šírka profilu resp. profilov stanovená podľa bodu 6.1.1.
 6.1.4.2. Táto hodnota môže byť prekročená o 4 % v radiálnych a o 8 % v diagonálnych (bias-ply) pneumatikách. Avšak v pneumatikách s menovitou šírkou profilu nad 305 mm, určených pre dvojitú montáž, hodnota stanovená podľa bodu 6.1.1. nesmie byť prekročená o viac ako 2 % u radiálnych (ply) pneumatík s menovitým profilovým číslom vyšším než 60, alebo o 4 % u diagonálnych (bias-ply) pneumatík.
 6.1.4.3. V prípade pneumatík označených symbolom „A“„konfigurácia montáže pneumatiky na ráfik“ (pozri bod 3.1.11.) je však celková šírka pneumatiky v spodnej časti pneumatiky rovná menovitej šírke ráfika, na ktorom je pneumatika namontovaná, zväčšená o 27 mm, podľa popisu výrobcu.
 6.1.5. Špecifikácie vonkajšieho priemeru pneumatiky:
 Vonkajší priemer pneumatiky sa musí pohybovať v rámci hodnôt Dmin a Dmax zistených z nasledovných vzorcov:
 Dmin = d + (2H × a)
 Dmax = d + (2H × b)
 kde:
 6.1.5.1.
 Pre rozmery uvedené v prílohe V a pre pneumatiky označené symbolom „A“„konfigurácia montáže pneumatiky na ráfik“ (pozri bod 3.1.11.) sa menovitá výška profilu rovná:
 H = 0,5 (D - d) –podrobnosti viď bod 6.1.2.1.
 6.1.5.2.
 Pre ostatné rozmery, ktoré nie sú uvedené v prílohe V
 „H“ a „d“ sú definované v bode 6.1.2.1.
 6.1.5.3.
 Koeficienty „a“ a „b“ sú:
 6.1.5.3.1.
 koeficient „a“ = 0,97
 6.1.5.3.2.
 koeficient „b“
 radiálne
 diagonálne
 pre normálne pneumatiky
 1,04
 1,07
 pre špeciálne pneumatiky
 1,06
 1,09
 6.1.5.3.3.
 Vonkajší priemer pneumatík na jazdu na snehu (Dmax) stanovený prispôsobením vyššie uvedených vzťahov môže byť prekročený o jedno percento.
 6.2. Zaťažovacia/rýchlostná únavová skúška
 6.2.1. Každý typ pneumatiky sa musí podrobiť najmenej jednej zaťažovacej/rýchlostnej únavovej skúške, vykonanej postupom opísaným v prílohe VII k tomuto predpisu.
 6.2.2. Na plášti pneumatiky, ktorá sa podrobila úspešne únavovej skúške sa nesmie objaviť žiadne oddeľovanie behúňa, vrstiev alebo kordu, ani vytrhávanie alebo pretrhnutie kordu.
 6.2.3. Vonkajší priemer pneumatiky meraný šesť hodín po zaťažovacej/rýchlostnej únavovej skúške sa nesmie líšiť viac ako o 3,5 percenta od vonkajšieho priemeru meraného pred skúškou.
 6.2.4. V prípade žiadosti o homologizáciu typu pneumatiky pre kombinácie hodnôt zaťažení a rýchlostí, uvedené v tabuľke prílohy 8, nie je potrebné vykonávať únavovú skúšku, predpísanú v bode 6.2.1, s inými hodnotami zaťažení a rýchlostí ako s menovitými hodnotami.
 6.2.5. V prípade žiadosti o homologizáciu typu pneumatiky, ktorý má okrem kombinácie hodnôt zaťažení a rýchlostí, uvedenej v tabuľke prílohy 8, ešte inú kombináciu týchto hodnôt, únavová skúška predpísaná v bode 6.2.1. sa vykoná aj pri druhej pneumatike toho istého typu pre túto dodatočnú kombináciu hodnôt zaťažení a rýchlostí.
 7. ZMENA A ROZŠÍRENIE HOMOLOGIZÁCIE TYPU PNEUMATIKY
 7.1. Každá zmena typu pneumatiky sa musí oznámiť správnemu orgánu, ktorý pre tento typ pneumatiky udelil homologizáciu. Toto oddelenie môže potom buď:
 7.1.1.
 zvážiť, že zmeny zrejme nemajú nepriaznivý vplyv, ktorý je možné posúdiť a že pneumatika v každom prípade ešte spĺňa požiadavky; alebo
 7.1.2.
 požadovať ďalšiu správu o skúškach od technickej služby poverenej vykonávaním skúšok.
 7.2. Pri zmene vzorky behúňa pneumatiky sa nepovažuje za nevyhnutné, aby boli opakované skúšky predpísané v bode 6 tohto predpisu.
 7.3. Potvrdenie homologizácie alebo jej odmietnutie, s uvedením zmien, sa musí oznámiť stranám dohody, uplatňujúcim tento predpis, postupom stanoveným v bode 5.3.
 7.4. Príslušný orgán, ktorý udeľuje rozšírenie homologizácie, musí toto rozšírenie označiť poradovým číslom a informovať o tom ostatné zmluvné strany dohody z roku 1958 uplatňujúce tento predpis prostredníctvom formulára oznámenia podľa vzoru v prílohe I k tomuto predpisu.
 8. ZHODA VÝROBY
 Postupy zabezpečenia zhody výroby musia byť v súlade s postupmi uvedenými v Dohode, doplnku 2 (E/ECE/324-E/ECE/TRANS/505/Rev.2), a musia spĺňať nasledovné požiadavky:
 8.1.
 Pneumatiky homologizované podľa tohto predpisu, musia byť vyrobené tak, aby zodpovedali homologizovanému typu tým, že spĺňajú požiadavky stanovené v bode 6.
 8.2.
 Orgán, ktorý udelil homologizáciu typu, môže kedykoľvek overiť metódy kontroly zhody používané v každom výrobnom závode. Normálna frekvencia týchto overovaní je pre každý výrobný závod raz za dva roky.
 9. SANKCIE ZA NEZHODU VÝROBY
 9.1. Homologizácia udelená pre typ pneumatiky podľa tohto predpisu môže byť odobratá, ak nie je splnená požiadavka stanovená v bode 8.1., alebo ak pneumatiky vybraté zo série nevyhoveli pri skúškach predpísaných v uvedenom bode.
 9.2. Ak odoberie niektorá strana dohody, používajúca tento predpis, homologizáciu, ktorú predtým udelila, musí o tom ihneď upovedomiť ostatné strany dohody, používajúce tento predpis, prostredníctvom formulára oznámenia podľa vzoru, ktorý je uvedený v prílohe I k tomuto predpisu.
 10. DEFINITÍVNE UKONČENIE VÝROBY
 Ak zastaví majiteľ homologizácie úplne výrobu typu pneumatiky homologizovaného podľa tohto predpisu, musí o tom vyrozumieť orgán, ktorý udelil homologizáciu. Po obdržaní príslušnej správy o tom tento orgán informuje ostatné strany Dohody z roku 1958, uplatňujúce tento predpis, kópiou formulára oznámenia podľa vzoru v prílohe I k tomuto predpisu.
 11. NÁZVY A ADRESY TECHNICKÝCH SLUŽIEB A SPRÁVNYCH ORGÁNOV ZODPOVEDNÝCH ZA VYKONÁVANIE HOMOLOGIZAČNÝCH SKÚŠOK
 11.1. Strany dohody, uplatňujúce tento predpis, musia oznámiť sekretariátu Organizácie spojených národov názvy a adresy technickým služieb zodpovedných za vykonávanie homologizačných skúšok, prípadne schválených skúšobní a správnych orgánov, ktoré udeľujú homologizáciu a ktorým sa majú zasielať formuláre osvedčujúce homologizáciu alebo odmietnutie, prípadne odobratie homologizácie, vydanej v iných krajinách.
 11.2. Strany dohody, uplatňujúce tento predpis, môžu používať skúšobne výrobcov pneumatík a môžu ustanoviť za schválené tie skúšobne, ktoré sú umiestnené na ich vlastnom území alebo území niektorej inej strany dohody s výhradou, ak tento postup schválil príslušné správne oddelenie druhej strany.
 11.3. V prípade, že niektorá strana dohody uplatňuje ustanovenie bodu 11.2, môže byť, ak si to želá, pri skúškach zastúpená osobou alebo osobami podľa vlastnej voľby.
 Vysvetľujúci obrázok
 (pozri bod 2 predpisu)
 (1) Ako je definované v Súhrnnej rezolúcii o konštrukcii vozidiel (R.E.3) (dokument TRANS/WP.29/78/Rev.1).
 (2) Pozri vysvetľujúci obrázok.
 (3) Z dôvodu jednotnosti sú v tejto tabuľke použité tie isté symboly a rýchlosti, ako pre osobné automobily (ako v predpise č. 30). Tieto údaje nie je možné vysvetľovať tak, že udávajú rýchlosti, ktorými nákladné automobily, vybavené týmito pneumatikami, môžu jazdiť na cestách.
 (4) Do 1. januára 2000 môže byť dátum výroby označený skupinou troch čísel, prvé dve vyjadrujú týždeň a tretie číslo rok výroby.
 (5) Toto označenie je záväzné len pre typy pneumatík homologizované podľa tohto nariadenia po nadobudnutí platnosti doplnku 14 tohto predpisu.
 (6) 1 pre Nemecko, 2 pre Francúzsko, 3 pre Taliansko, 4 pre Holandsko, 5 pre Švédsko, 6 pre Belgicko, 7 pre Maďarsko, 8 pre Českú republiku, 9 pre Španielsko, 10 pre Srbsko a Čiernu Horu, 11 pre Spojené kráľovstvo, 12 pre Rakúsko, 13 pre Luxembursko, 14 pre Švajčiarsko, 15 (voľné), 16 pre Nórsko, 17 pre Fínsko, 18 pre Dánsko, 19 pre Rumunsko, 20 pre Poľsko, 21 pre Portugalsko, 22 pre Ruskú federáciu, 23 pre Grécko, 24 pre Írsko, 25 pre Chorvátsko, 26 pre Slovinsko, 27 pre Slovensko, 28 pre Bielorusko, 29 pre Estónsko, 30 (voľné), 31 pre Bosnu a Hercegovinu, 32 pre Lotyšsko, 33 (voľné), 34 pre Bulharsko, 35 (voľné), 36 pre Litvu, 37 pre Turecko, 38 (voľné), 39 pre Azerbajdžan, 40 pre Bývalú juhoslovanskú republiku Macedónsko, 41 (voľné), 42 pre Európske spoločenstvo (homologizácie udelené členskými štátmi používajúcimi ich príslušný symbol EHK), 43 pre Japonsko, 44 (voľné), 45 pre Austráliu, 46 pre Ukrajinu, 47 pre Južnú Afriku a 48 pre Nový Zéland. Nasledujúce čísla sa pridelia ďalším štátom postupne v poradí, v ktorom budú ratifikovať Dohodu o prijatí jednotných technických predpisov pre kolesové vozidlá, zariadenia a časti, ktoré sa môžu montovať a/alebo používať na kolesových vozidlách a o podmienkach pre vzájomné uznávanie homologizácií, udelených na základe týchto predpisov, alebo v ktorom k nej pristúpia, a takto pridelené čísla oznámi generálny tajomník Organizácie Spojených národov zmluvným stranám Dohody.
 PRÍLOHA I
 OZNÁMENIE
 (maximálny formát A4 (210 × 297 mm))
 PRÍLOHA II
 USPORIADANIE HOMOLOGIZAČNEJ ZNAČKY
 Uvedená homologizačná značka umiestnená na pneumatike znamená, že uvedený typ pneumatiky bol homologizovaný v Holandsku (E4) pod homologizačným číslom 002439. Prvé dve číslice homologizačného čísla uvádzajú, že homologizácia bola udelená v súlade s požiadavkami predpisu č. 54 v jeho pôvodnom znení.
 Poznámka:
 Homologizačné číslo sa musí umiestniť v blízkosti kružnice, a to buď nad alebo pod písmenom „E“, prípadne vpravo alebo vľavo od tohto písmena. Všetky číslice homologizačného čísla musia byť na tej istej strane písmena „E“ a musia smerovať tým istým smerom. Je potrebné vyhnúť sa používaniu rímskych číslic pre homologizačné čísla, aby sa vylúčila možnosť zámeny s inými symbolmi.
 PRÍLOHA III
 Usporiadanie označenia na pneumatike
 Minimálna výška označení
 (mm)
 Pneumatiky s priemerom ráfika < 508 mm (kód 20) alebo menovitou šírkou profilu ≤ 235 mm (kód 9)
 Pneumatiky s priemerom ráfika ≥ 508 mm (kód 20) alebo menovitou šírkou profilu > 235 mm (kód 9)
 B
 6
 9
 C
 4
 D
 6
 1. Toto označenie určuje pneumatiku,:
 ktorá má menovitú šírku profilu 255;
 ktorá má menovité profilové číslo 70;
 s radiálnou konštrukciou (R);
 ktorá má menovitý priemer ráfika 572 mm, ktorý má označenie 22,5;
 ktorá má nosnosť 3 150 kg pri jednoduchej a 2 900 kg pri dvojitej montáži, zodpovedajúcej indexom nosnosti 148 a 145 podľa prílohy IV k tomuto predpisu;
 ktorá má referenčnú rýchlosť 100 km/h zodpovedajúcu symbolu rýchlostnej kategórie: J
 klasifikovanú v kategórii použitia pneumatika na jazdu do snehu: M+S
 použiteľnú dodatočne pri rýchlosti 120 km/h (symbol rýchlostnej kategórie L) s nosnosťou 3 000 kg pri jednoduchej a 2 725 kg pri dvojitej montáži, zodpovedajúcej indexom nosnosti 145 resp. 143 podľa prílohy 4 k tomuto predpisu;
 montovateľnú bez duše: „TUBELESS“
 vyrobenú v 25. týždni roku 2003; a
 S predpísaným tlakom 620 kPa pre zaťažovacie/rýchlostné únavové skúšky so zodpovedajúcim symbolom PSI 90.
 2. V špeciálnych prípadoch s konfiguráciou montáže pneumatiky na ráfik „A“ musí byť označenie usporiadané podľa tohto príkladu:
 235-700 R 450A kde:
 235 je menovitá šírka profilu v mm
 700 je vonkajší priemer vyjadrený v mm
 R je označenie štruktúry pneumatiky – pozri bod 3.1.3. tohto predpisu
 450 je menovitý priemer ráfika vyjadrený v mm
 A je konfigurácia montáže pneumatiky na ráfik.
 Označenie indexu nosnosti, symbolu kategórie rýchlosti, dátumu výroby a iné označenia sa uvedú podľa uvedeného príkladu 1.
 3. Umiestnenie a poradie značiek tvoriacich označenie pneumatiky musí byť takéto:
 a)
 označenie rozmeru podľa bodu 2.17. tohto predpisu sa usporiada tak, ako je naznačené vo vyššie uvedených príkladoch: 255/70 R 22,5 alebo 235-700 R 450A;
 b)
 prevádzkový popis obsahujúci index (-y) nosnosti a symbol rýchlostnej kategórie sa umiestni bezprostredne po označení rozmeru pneumatiky podľa bodu 2.17. tohto predpisu;
 c)
 symboly „TUBELESS“ a „M+S“ alebo „FRT“ alebo „MPT“ (a ekvivalentné) môžu byť v určitej vzdialenosti od symbolu označujúceho rozmer;
 d)
 ak sa uplatňuje ustanovenie bodu 6.2.5. tohto predpisu, indexy doplnkovej nosnosti a symbol rýchlostnej kategórie sa musia uviesť do vnútra kružnice v blízkosti indexov menovitej nosnosti a symbolu rýchlostnej kategórie, vyznačených na bočnici pneumatiky.
 PRÍLOHA IV
 Zoznam symbolov indexov nosnosti
 Index nosnosti
 Príslušná maximálna hmotnosť (kg)
 60
 250
 61
 257
 62
 265
 63
 272
 64
 280
 65
 290
 66
 300
 67
 307
 68
 315
 69
 325
 70
 335
 71
 345
 72
 355
 73
 365
 74
 375
 75
 387
 76
 400
 77
 412
 78
 425
 79
 437
 80
 450
 81
 462
 82
 475
 83
 487
 84
 500
 85
 515
 86
 530
 87
 545
 88
 560
 89
 580
 90
 600
 91
 615
 92
 630
 93
 650
 94
 670
 95
 690
 96
 710
 97
 730
 98
 750
 99
 775
 100
 800
 101
 825
 102
 850
 103
 875
 104
 900
 105
 925
 106
 950
 107
 975
 108
 1 000
 109
 1 030
 110
 1 060
 111
 1 090
 112
 1 120
 113
 1 150
 114
 1 180
 115
 1 215
 116
 1 250
 117
 1 285
 118
 1 320
 119
 1 360
 120
 1 400
 121
 1 450
 122
 1 500
 123
 1 550
 124
 1 600
 125
 1 650
 126
 1 700
 127
 1 750
 128
 1 800
 129
 1 850
 130
 1 900
 131
 1 950
 132
 2 000
 133
 2 060
 134
 2 120
 135
 2 180
 136
 2 240
 137
 2 300
 138
 2 360
 139
 2 430
 140
 2 500
 141
 2 575
 142
 2 650
 143
 2 725
 144
 2 800
 145
 2 900
 146
 3 000
 147
 3 075
 148
 3 150
 149
 3 250
 150
 3 350
 151
 3 450
 152
 3 550
 153
 3 650
 154
 3 750
 155
 3 875
 156
 4 000
 157
 4 125
 158
 4 250
 159
 4 375
 160
 4 500
 161
 4 625
 162
 4 750
 163
 4 875
 164
 5 000
 165
 5 150
 166
 5 300
 167
 5 450
 168
 5 600
 169
 5 800
 170
 6 000
 171
 6 150
 172
 6 300
 173
 6 500
 174
 6 700
 175
 6 900
 176
 7 100
 177
 7 300
 178
 7 500
 179
 7 750
 180
 8 000
 181
 8 250
 182
 8 500
 183
 8 750
 184
 9 000
 185
 9 250
 186
 9 500
 187
 9 750
 188
 10 000
 189
 10 300
 190
 10 600
 191
 10 900
 192
 11 200
 193
 11 500
 194
 11 800
 195
 12 150
 196
 12 500
 197
 12 850
 198
 13 200
 199
 13 600
 200
 14 000
 PRÍLOHA V
 Označenie rozmeru pneumatík a rozmery
 ČASŤ I
 EURÓPSKE PNEUMATIKY
 Tabuľka A
 Kódom označené pneumatiky montované na ráfiky s úkosom 5° alebo ploché ráfiky. Radiálna a diagonálna konštrukcia
 Označenie rozmeru plášťa (1)
 Kód šírky meracieho ráfika
 Menovitý priemer ráfika d (mm)
 Vonkajší priemer D (mm)
 Šírka profilu S (mm)
 Radiálne
 Diagonálne
 Radiálne
 Diagonálne
 Štandardný rad
 4.00R8 (2)
 2.50
 203
 414
 414
 107
 107
 4.00R10 (2)
 3.00
 254
 466
 466
 108
 108
 4.00R12 (2)
 3.00
 305
 517
 517
 108
 108
 4.50R8 (2)
 3.50
 203
 439
 439
 125
 125
 4.50R10 (2)
 3.50
 254
 490
 490
 125
 125
 4.50R12 (2)
 3.50
 305
 545
 545
 125
 128
 5.00R8 (2)
 3.00
 203
 467
 467
 132
 132
 5.00R10 (2)
 3.50
 254
 516
 516
 134
 134
 5.00R12 (2)
 3.50
 305
 568
 568
 134
 137
 6.00R9
 4.00
 229
 540
 540
 160
 160
 6.00R14C
 4.50
 356
 626
 625
 158
 158
 6.00R16 (2)
 4.50
 406
 728
 730
 170
 170
 6.50R10
 5.00
 254
 588
 588
 177
 177
 6.50R14C
 5.00
 356
 640
 650
 170
 172
 6.50R16 (2)
 4.50
 406
 742
 748
 176
 176
 6.50R20 (2)
 5.00
 508
 860
 —
 181
 —
 7.00R12
 5.00
 305
 672
 672
 192
 192
 7.00R14C
 5.00
 356
 650
 668
 180
 182
 7.00R15 (2)
 5.00
 381
 746
 752
 197
 198
 7.00R16C
 5.50
 406
 778
 778
 198
 198
 7.00R16
 5.50
 406
 784
 774
 198
 198
 7.00R20
 5.50
 508
 892
 898
 198
 198
 7.50R10
 5.50
 254
 645
 645
 207
 207
 7.50R14C
 5.50
 356
 686
 692
 195
 192
 7.50R15 (2)
 6.00
 381
 772
 772
 212
 212
 7.50R16 (2)
 6.00
 406
 802
 806
 210
 210
 7.50R17 (2)
 6.00
 432
 852
 852
 210
 210
 7.50R20
 6.00
 508
 928
 928
 210
 213
 8.25R15
 6.50
 381
 836
 836
 230
 234
 8.25R16
 6.50
 406
 860
 860
 230
 234
 8.25R17
 6.50
 432
 886
 895
 230
 234
 8.25R20
 6.50
 508
 962
 970
 230
 234
 9.00R15
 6.00
 381
 840
 840
 249
 249
 9.00R16 (2)
 6.50
 406
 912
 900
 246
 252
 9.00R20
 7.00
 508
 1 018
 1 012
 258
 256
 10.00R15
 7.50
 381
 918
 918
 275
 275
 10.00R20
 7.50
 508
 1 052
 1 050
 275
 275
 10.00R22
 7.50
 559
 1 102
 1 102
 275
 275
 11.00R16
 6.50
 406
 980
 952
 279
 272
 11.00R20
 8.00
 508
 1 082
 1 080
 286
 291
 11.00R22
 8.00
 559
 1 132
 1 130
 286
 291
 11.00R24
 8.00
 610
 1 182
 1 180
 286
 291
 12.00R20
 8.50
 508
 1 122
 1 120
 313
 312
 12.00R22
 8.50
 559
 1 174
 1 174
 313
 312
 12.00R24
 8.50
 610
 1 226
 1 220
 313
 312
 13.00R20
 9.00
 508
 1 176
 1 170
 336
 342
 14.00R20
 10.00
 508
 1 238
 1 238
 370
 375
 14.00R24
 10.00
 610
 1 340
 1 340
 370
 375
 16.00R20
 13.00
 508
 1 370
 1 370
 446
 446
 Séria 80
 12/80 R 20
 8.50
 508
 1 008
 —
 305
 —
 13/80 R 20
 9.00
 508
 1 048
 —
 326
 —
 14/80 R 20
 10.00
 508
 1 090
 —
 350
 —
 14/80 R 24
 10.00
 610
 1 192
 —
 350
 —
 14.75/80 R 20
 10.00
 508
 1 124
 —
 370
 —
 15.5/80 R 20
 10.00
 508
 1 158
 —
 384
 —
 Pre viacúčelové vozidlá
 7.50 R 18 MPT
 5.50
 457
 885
 208
 10.5 R 18 MPT
 9
 457
 905
 276
 270
 10.5 R 20 MPT
 9
 508
 955
 276
 270
 12.5 R 18 MPT
 11
 457
 990
 330
 325
 12.5 R 20 MPT
 11
 508
 1 040
 330
 325
 14.5 R 20 MPT
 11
 508
 1 095
 362
 355
 14.5 R 24 MPT
 11
 610
 1 195
 362
 355
 Tabuľka B
 Kódom označené pneumatiky montované na ráfiky s úkosom 15° – radiálne
 Označenie rozmeru plášťa
 Kód šírky meracieho ráfika
 Menovitý priemer ráfika d (mm)
 Vonkajší priemer
 D (mm)
 Šírka profilu
 S (mm)
 7 R 17.5 (3)
 5.25
 445
 752
 185
 7 R 19.5
 5.25
 495
 800
 185
 8 R 17.5 (3)
 6.00
 445
 784
 208
 8 R 19.5
 6.00
 495
 856
 208
 8 R 22.5
 6.00
 572
 936
 208
 8.5 R 17.5
 6.00
 445
 802
 215
 9 R 17.5
 6.75
 445
 820
 230
 9 R 19.5
 6.75
 495
 894
 230
 9 R 22.5
 6.75
 572
 970
 230
 9.5 R 17.5
 6.75
 445
 842
 240
 9.5 R 19.5
 6.75
 495
 916
 240
 10 R 17.5
 7.50
 445
 858
 254
 10 R 19.5
 7.50
 495
 936
 254
 10 R 22.5
 7.50
 572
 1 020
 254
 11 R 22.5
 8.25
 572
 1 050
 279
 11 R 24.5
 8.25
 622
 1 100
 279
 12 R 22.5
 9.00
 572
 1 084
 300
 13 R 22.5
 9.75
 572
 1 124
 320
 15 R 19.5
 11.75
 495
 998
 387
 15 R 22.5
 11.75
 572
 1 074
 387
 16.5 R 19.5
 13.00
 495
 1 046
 425
 16.5 R 22.5
 13.00
 572
 1 122
 425
 18 R 19.5
 14.00
 495
 1 082
 457
 18 R 22.5
 14.00
 572
 1 158
 457
 Séria 70
 10/70 R 22.5
 7.50
 572
 928
 254
 11/70 R 22.5
 8.25
 572
 962
 279
 12/70 R 22.5
 9.00
 572
 1 000
 305
 13/70 R 22.5
 9.75
 572
 1 033
 330
 Tabuľka C
 Pneumatiky pre ľahké úžitkové vozidlá – radiálna a diagonálna konštrukcia
 Označenie rozmeru plášťa (4)
 Kód šírky meracieho ráfika
 Menovitý priemer ráfika d (mm)
 Vonkajší priemer D (mm)
 Šírka profilu S (mm)
 Radiálne
 Diagonálne
 Radiálne
 Diagonálne
 Označené metricky
 145 R 10 C
 4.00
 254
 492
 —
 147
 —
 145 R 12 C
 4.00
 305
 542
 —
 147
 —
 145 R 13 C
 4.00
 330
 566
 —
 147
 —
 145 R 14 C
 4.00
 356
 590
 —
 147
 —
 145 R 15 C
 4.00
 381
 616
 —
 147
 —
 155 R 12 C
 4.50
 305
 550
 —
 157
 —
 155 R 13 C
 4.50
 330
 578
 —
 157
 —
 155 R 14 C
 4.50
 356
 604
 —
 157
 —
 165 R 13 C
 4.50
 330
 596
 —
 167
 —
 165 R 14 C
 4.50
 356
 622
 —
 167
 —
 165 R 15 C
 4.50
 381
 646
 —
 167
 —
 175 R 13 C
 5.00
 330
 608
 —
 178
 —
 175 R 14 C
 5.00
 356
 634
 —
 178
 —
 175 R 16 C
 5.00
 406
 684
 —
 178
 —
 185 R 13 C
 5.50
 330
 624
 —
 188
 —
 185 R 14 C
 5.50
 356
 650
 —
 188
 —
 185 R 15 C
 5.50
 381
 674
 —
 188
 —
 185 R 16 C
 5.50
 406
 700
 —
 188
 —
 195 R 14 C
 5.50
 356
 666
 —
 198
 —
 195 R 15 C
 5.50
 381
 690
 —
 198
 —
 195 R 16 C
 5.50
 406
 716
 —
 198
 —
 205 R 14 C
 6.00
 356
 686
 —
 208
 —
 205 R 15 C
 6.00
 381
 710
 —
 208
 —
 205 R 16 C
 6.00
 406
 736
 —
 208
 —
 215 R 14 C
 6.00
 356
 700
 —
 218
 —
 215 R 15 C
 6.00
 381
 724
 —
 218
 —
 215 R 16 C
 6.00
 406
 750
 —
 218
 —
 245 R 16 C
 7.00
 406
 798
 798
 248
 248
 17 R 15 C
 5.00
 381
 678
 —
 178
 —
 17 R 380 C
 5.00
 381
 678
 —
 178
 —
 17 R 400 C
 150 mm
 400
 698
 —
 186
 —
 19 R 400 C
 150 mm
 400
 728
 —
 200
 —
 Označené kódom
 5.60 R 12 C
 4.00
 305
 570
 572
 150
 148
 6.40 R 13 C
 5.00
 330
 648
 640
 172
 172
 6.70 R 13 C
 5.00
 330
 660
 662
 180
 180
 6.70 R 14 C
 5.00
 356
 688
 688
 180
 180
 6.70 R 15 C
 5.00
 381
 712
 714
 180
 180
 Tabuľka D
 Pneumatiky pre špeciálne použitie – radiálna a diagonálna konštrukcia
 Označenie rozmeru plášťa (5)
 Kód šírky meracieho ráfika
 Menovitý priemer ráfika d (mm)
 Vonkajší priemer
 D (mm)
 Šírka profilu
 S (mm)
 Označené kódom
 15×4 1/2-8
 3.25
 203
 385
 122
 16×6-8
 4.33
 203
 425
 152
 18×7
 4.33
 203
 462
 173
 18×7-8
 4.33
 203
 462
 173
 21×8-9
 6.00
 229
 535
 200
 21×4
 2.32
 330
 565
 113
 22×4 1/2
 3.11
 330
 595
 132
 23×5
 3.75
 330
 635
 155
 23×9-10
 6.50
 254
 595
 225
 25×6
 3.75
 330
 680
 170
 27×10-12
 8.00
 305
 690
 255
 28×9-15
 7.00
 381
 707
 216
 Označené metricky
 200-15
 6.50
 381
 730
 205
 250-15
 7.50
 381
 735
 250
 300—15
 8.00
 381
 840
 300
 ČASŤ II
 AMERICKÉ PNEUMATIKY
 —
 Tolerancie týkajúce sa spodnej časti tabuliek sú uvedené v bodoch 6.1.4.2. a 6.1.5.3.
 —
 Vonkajšie priemery sú uvedené pre rôzne kategórie použitia : normálne, na jazdu na snehu, špeciálne.
 Tabuľka A
 Pneumatiky pre ľahké úžitkové vozidlá (LT pneumatiky)
 Diagonálne a radiálne
 Označenie rozmeru plášťa (6)
 Kód šírky meracieho ráfika
 Menovitý priemer ráfika d (mm)
 Vonkajší priemer D (mm) (7)
 Šírka profilu
 S (mm) (8)
 Normálna
 Do snehu
 6.00-16LT
 4.50
 406
 732
 743
 173
 6.50-16LT
 4.50
 406
 755
 767
 182
 6.70-16LT
 5.00
 406
 722
 733
 191
 7.00-13LT
 5.00
 330
 647
 658
 187
 7.00-14LT
 5.00
 356
 670
 681
 187
 7.00-15LT
 5.50
 381
 752
 763
 202
 7.00-16LT
 5.50
 406
 778
 788
 202
 7.10-15LT
 5.00
 381
 738
 749
 199
 7.50-15LT
 6.00
 381
 782
 794
 220
 7.50-16LT
 6.00
 406
 808
 819
 220
 8.25—16LT
 6.50
 406
 859
 869
 241
 9.00-16LT
 6.50
 406
 890
 903
 257
 G78-15LT
 6.00
 381
 711
 722
 212
 H78-15LT
 6.00
 381
 727
 739
 222
 L78-15LT
 6.50
 381
 749
 760
 236
 L78-16LT
 6.50
 406
 775
 786
 236
 7-14.5LT (9)
 6.00
 368
 677
 185
 8-14.5LT (9)
 6.00
 368
 707
 203
 9-14.5LT (9)
 7.00
 368
 711
 241
 7-17.5LT
 5.25
 445
 758
 769
 189
 8-17.5LT
 5.25
 445
 788
 799
 199
 Tabuľka B
 Pneumatiky pre ľahké úžitkové vozidlá (vysokoprofilové pneumatiky)
 Diagonálne a radiálne
 Označenie rozmeru plášťa (10)
 Kód šírky meracieho ráfika
 Menovitý priemer ráfika d (mm)
 Vonkajší priemer D (mm) (11)
 Šírka profilu
 S (mm) (12)
 Normálne
 Do snehu
 9-15LT
 8.00
 381
 744
 755
 254
 10-15LT
 8.00
 381
 773
 783
 264
 11-15LT
 8.00
 381
 777
 788
 279
 24×7.50-13LT
 6
 330
 597
 604
 191
 27×8.50-14LT
 7
 356
 674
 680
 218
 28×8.50—15LT
 7
 381
 699
 705
 218
 29×9.50-15LT
 7.5
 381
 724
 731
 240
 30×9.50—15LT
 7.5
 381
 750
 756
 240
 31×10.50-15LT
 8.5
 381
 775
 781
 268
 31×11.50-15LT
 9
 381
 775
 781
 290
 31×13.50-15LT
 11
 381
 775
 781
 345
 31×15.50-15LT
 12
 381
 775
 781
 390
 32×11.50—15LT
 9
 381
 801
 807
 290
 33×12.50-15LT
 10
 381
 826
 832
 318
 35×12.50—15LT
 10
 381
 877
 883
 318
 37×12.50-15LT
 10
 381
 928
 934
 318
 37×14.50-15LT
 12
 381
 928
 934
 372
 8.00-16.5LT
 6.00
 419
 720
 730
 203
 8.75-16.5LT
 6.75
 419
 748
 759
 222
 9.50-16.5LT
 6.75
 419
 776
 787
 241
 10—16.5LT
 8.25
 419
 762
 773
 264
 12-16.5LT
 9.75
 419
 818
 831
 307
 30×9.50-16.5LT
 7.50
 419
 750
 761
 240
 31×10.50-16.5LT
 8.25
 419
 775
 787
 266
 33×12.50-16.5LT
 9.75
 419
 826
 838
 315
 37×12.50-16.5LT
 9.75
 419
 928
 939
 315
 37×14.50—16.5LT
 11.25
 419
 928
 939
 365
 33×9.50 R15LT
 7.50
 381
 826
 832
 240
 35×12.50 R16.5LT
 10.00
 419
 877
 883
 318
 37×12.50 R17LT
 10.00
 432
 928
 934
 318
 Tabuľka C
 Kódom označené pneumatiky montované na ráfiky s úkosom 5° alebo ploché ráfiky.
 Diagonálne a radiálne
 Označenie rozmeru plášťa (13)
 Kód šírky meracieho ráfika
 Menovitý priemer ráfika d (mm)
 Vonkajší priemer D (mm) (14)
 Šírka profilu
 S (mm) (15)
 Normálne
 Do snehu
 a)
 b)
 6.50-20
 5
 508
 878
 893
 184
 7.00-15TR
 5.5
 381
 777
 792
 199
 7.00-18
 5.5
 457
 853
 868
 199
 7.00-20
 5.5
 508
 904
 919
 199
 7.50-15TR
 6
 381
 808
 825
 215
 7.50-17
 6
 432
 859
 876
 215
 7.50-18
 6
 457
 884
 901
 215
 7.50-20
 6
 508
 935
 952
 215
 8.25-15TR
 6.5
 381
 847
 855
 865
 236
 8.25-20
 6.5
 508
 974
 982
 992
 236
 9.00-15TR
 7
 381
 891
 904
 911
 259
 9.00-20
 7
 508
 1 019
 1 031
 1 038
 259
 10.00-15TR
 7.5
 381
 927
 940
 946
 278
 10.00-20
 7.5
 508
 1 054
 1 067
 1 073
 278
 10.00-22
 7.5
 559
 1 104
 1 118
 1 123
 278
 11.00-20
 8
 508
 1 085
 1 099
 1 104
 293
 11.00-22
 8
 559
 1 135
 1 150
 1 155
 293
 11.00-24
 8
 610
 1 186
 1 201
 1 206
 293
 11.50-20
 8
 508
 1 085
 1 099
 1 104
 296
 12.00-20
 8.5
 508
 1 125
 1 146
 315
 12.00-24
 8.5
 610
 1 226
 1 247
 315
 14.00-20
 10
 508
 1 241
 1 266
 375
 14.00-24
 10
 610
 1 343
 1 368
 375
 Tabuľka D
 Kód označenia pneumatík na špeciálne použitie
 Diagonálne a radiálne
 Označenie rozmeru plášťa
 Kód šírky meracieho ráfika
 Menovitý priemer ráfika d (mm)
 Vonkajší priemer D (mm) (16)
 Šírka profilu
 S (mm) (17)
 a)
 b)
 10.00-20ML
 7.5
 508
 1 073
 1 099
 278
 11.00-22ML
 8
 559
 1 155
 1 182
 293
 13.00-24ML
 9
 610
 1 302
 340
 14.00-20ML
 10
 508
 1 266
 375
 14.00-24ML
 10
 610
 1 368
 375
 15-19.5ML
 11.75
 495
 1 019
 389
 24 R 21
 18
 533
 1 372
 —
 610
 Tabuľka E
 Kódom označené pneumatiky montované na ráfiky s úkosom 15°
 Diagonálne a radiálne
 Označenie rozmeru plášťa (18)
 Kód šírky meracieho ráfika
 Menovitý priemer ráfika d (mm)
 Vonkajší priemer D (mm) (19)
 Šírka profilu
 S (mm) (20)
 Normálne
 Do snehu
 a)
 b)
 8-19.5
 6.00
 495
 859
 876
 203
 8-22.5
 6.00
 572
 935
 952
 203
 9-22.5
 6.75
 572
 974
 982
 992
 229
 10-22.5
 7.50
 572
 1 019
 1 031
 1 038
 254
 11-22.5
 8.25
 572
 1 054
 1 067
 1 073
 279
 11-24.5
 8.25
 622
 1 104
 1 118
 1 123
 279
 12-22.5
 9.00
 572
 1 085
 1 099
 1 104
 300
 12-24.5
 9.00
 622
 1 135
 1 150
 1 155
 300
 12.5-22.5
 9.00
 572
 1 085
 1 099
 1 104
 302
 12.5-24.5
 9.00
 622
 1 135
 1 150
 1 155
 302
 14-17.5
 10.50
 445
 907
 921
 349 (—)
 15-19.5
 11.75
 495
 1 005
 1 019
 389 (—)
 15-22.5
 11.75
 572
 1 082
 1 095
 389 (—)
 16.5-22.5
 13.00
 572
 1 128
 1 144
 425 (—)
 18-19.5
 14.00
 495
 1 080
 1 096
 457 (—)
 18-22.5
 14.00
 572
 1 158
 1 172
 457 (—)
 (1)
 (+)
 Pneumatiky diagonálnej konštrukcie sa označujú pomlčkou „—“ namiesto písmena „R“ (napr. 5,00-8).
 (2) Označenie rozmeru plášťa môže byť doplnené písmenom „C“ (napr.6,00-16C).
 (3) Označenie rozmeru plášťa môže byť doplnené písmenom „C“ ( napr. 7 R 17,5 C ).
 (4)
 (+)
 Pneumatiky diagonálnej konštrukcie sa označujú pomlčkou „—“ namiesto písmena „R“ (napr. 145-10 C).
 (5)
 (+)
 Pneumatiky radiálnej konštrukcie sa označujú písmenom „R“ namiesto „—“ pomlčky (napr. 15x4 1/2 R 8).
 (6) Pneumatiky radiálnej konštrukcie sa označujú písmenom „R“ namiesto pomlčky „—“ (napr. 6,00 R 16LT).
 (7) Koeficient „b“ pre výpočet Dmax: 1,08.
 (8) Celková šírka môže túto hodnotu prekročiť najviac o + 8 %.
 (9) Prípona „MH“ môže nahradiť „LT“ v označení rozmeru plášťa (napr. 7-14,5 MH).
 (10) Pneumatiky radiálnej konštrukcie sa označujú písmenom „R“ namiesto pomlčky „—“ (napr. 24x7,50 R 13LT).
 (11) Koeficient „b“ pre výpočet Dmax: 1,07.
 (12) Celková šírka môže túto hodnotu prekročiť najviac o + 7 %
 (13) Pneumatiky radiálnej konštrukcie sa označujú písmenom „R“ namiesto pomlčky „—“ (napr. 6,50 R 20).
 (14) Koeficient „b“ pre výpočet Dmax: 1,06 . Kategória použitia: Pneumatiky na bežné použitie: (a) cestný dezén (b) ťažký dezén.
 (15) Celková šírka môže túto hodnotu prekročiť najviac o + 6 %.
 (16) Koeficient „b“ pre výpočet Dmax: 1,06.
 Kategória použitia: špeciálna a) cestný dezén (b) ťažký dezén.
 (17) Celková šírka môže túto hodnotu prekročiť najviac o + 8 %.
 (18) Pneumatiky radiálnej konštrukcie sa označujú písmenom „R“ namiesto pomlčky „—“ (napr. 8R19,5).
 (19) Koeficient „b“ pre výpočet Dmax: 1,05.
 Kategória použitia: Pneumatiky na bežné použitie: (a) cestný dezén (b) ťažký dezén.
 (20) Celková šírka môže túto hodnotu prekročiť najviac o + 6 %.
 (—) Celková šírka môže túto hodnotu prekročiť najviac o + 5 %.
 PRÍLOHA VI
 Metóda merania pneumatík
 1.
 Pneumatika sa namontuje na merací ráfik, predpísaný výrobcom podľa bodu 4.1.11. tohto predpisu, a nahustí sa na tlak stanovený výrobcom podľa bodu 4.1.12. tohto predpisu.
 2.
 Pneumatika, namontovaná na ráfiku, sa klimatizuje na teplotu miestnosti skúšobného laboratória po dobu najmenej 24 hodín.
 3.
 Tlak sa upraví na hodnotu stanovenú vo vyššie uvedenom bode 1.
 4.
 Celková šírka sa meria posuvným merítkom v šiestich rovnomerne rozložených miestach s prihliadnutím na hrúbku všetkých ochranných rebier alebo pásov. Vonkajší priemer sa vypočíta z maximálneho obvodu. Za celkovú šírku sa považuje najvyššia z takto nameraných hodnôt.
 5.
 Z najväčšieho obvodu sa vypočíta vonkajší priemer.
 PRÍLOHA VII
 Postup pri vykonávaní zaťažovacích/rýchlostných únavových skúškok
 1. PRÍPRAVA PNEUMATIKY
 1.1. Nová pneumatika sa namontuje na skúšobný ráfik, predpísaný výrobcom podľa bodu 4.1.11. tohto predpisu.
 1.2. Pri skúšaní pneumatík s dušou sa použijú nové duše alebo súprava duše, ventilu a ochrannej vložky (podľa toho, ako je to požadované).
 1.3. Pneumatika sa nahustí na tlak zodpovedajúci indexu hustiaceho tlaku, stanoveného výrobcom podľa bodu 4.1.12. tohto predpisu.
 1.4. Súprava pneumatiky s kolesom sa klimatizuje na teplotu skúšobnej miestnosti najmenej po dobu troch hodín.
 1.5. Tlak v pneumatike sa znovu upraví na hodnotu stanovenú v uvedenom bode 1.3.
 2. SKÚŠOBNÝ POSTUP
 2.1. Súprava pneumatiky s kolesom sa namontuje na skúšobný hriadeľ a pritlačí k vonkajšej ploche motorom poháňaného hladkého skúšobného bubna s priemerom 1,70 m ± 1 %, ktorého povrch je najmenej taký široký ako behúň pneumatiky.
 2.2. Na skúšobný hriadeľ sa pôsobí sériou skúšobných zaťažení, vyjadrených v percentách zaťaženia uvedeného v prílohe 4 tohto predpisu oproti indexu nosnosti, vyrazenému na bočnici pneumatiky podľa nižšie uvedeného skúšobného programu. Ak má pneumatika indexy nosnosti pre jednoduchú i dvojitú montáž, potom sa ako základ pre skúšobné zaťaženie použije referenčné zaťaženie pre jednoduchú montáž.
 2.2.1. Pre pneumatiky s indexom rýchlostnej kategórie vyššej ako P, sú skúšobné postupy definované v bode 3.
 2.2.2. Pre všetky ostatné typy pneumatík je program únavovej skúšky znázornený v doplnku 1 k tejto prílohe.
 2.3. Po dobu trvania skúšky sa tlak v pneumatike nesmie upravovať a skúšobné zaťaženie sa musí v každom z troch skúšobných stupňov udržiavať na konštantnej hodnote.
 2.4. Po dobu skúšky sa teplota v skúšobnej miestnosti musí udržiavať v rozmedzí od 20 °C do 30 °C alebo môže byť vyššia, ak s tým súhlasí výrobca.
 2.5. Program únavovej skúšky sa musí uskutočniť bez prerušovania.
 3. PROGRAM ZAŤAŽOVACÍCH/RÝCHLOSTNÝCH SKÚŠOK PRE PNEUMATIKU SO SYMBOLOM RÝCHLOSTNEJ KATEGÓRIE Q A VYŠŠEJ
 3.1. Tento program sa uplatňuje na:
 3.1.1.
 všetky pneumatiky označené indexom zaťaženia pri jednoduchej montáži 121 alebo nižším.
 3.1.2.
 pneumatiky označené indexom zaťaženia pri jednoduchej montáži 122 alebo vyšším s doplnkovým označením „C“ alebo „LT“ podľa bodu 3.1.13. tohto predpisu.
 3.2. Zaťaženie umiestnené na kolese ako percentuálne zaťaženie zodpovedajúce indexu nosnosti:
 3.2.1.
 90 % ak je skúšané na skúšobnom bubne s priemerom 1,70 m ± 1 %;
 3.2.2.
 92 % ak je skúšané na skúšobnom bubne s priemerom 2,00 m ± 1 %.
 3.3. Počiatočná skúšobná rýchlosť: rýchlosť zodpovedajúca symbolu rýchlostnej kategórie znížená o 20 km/h;
 3.3.1. Čas potrebný na dosiahnutie počiatočnej rýchlosti = 10 min.
 3.3.2. Trvanie prvého kroku = 10 min.
 3.4. Druhá rýchlostná skúška: rýchlosť zodpovedajúca symbolu rýchlostnej kategórie znížená o 10 km/h;
 3.4.1. Trvanie druhého kroku = 10 min.
 3.5. Konečná skúšobná rýchlosť: rýchlosť zodpovedajúca symbolu rýchlostnej kategórie:
 3.5.1.
 Trvanie posledného kroku = 30 min.
 3.6. Celková doba trvania skúšky: 1 h.
 4. ROVNOCENNÉ SKÚŠOBNÉ METÓDY
 Ak sa použije iná metóda ako tá, ktorá je uvedená v bode 2, musí byť preukázaná jej rovnocennosť.
 Dodatok 1
 Program únavových skúšok
 Index nosnosti
 Kategória rýchlosti pneumatiky
 Rýchlosť skúšobného bubna:
 Zaťaženie kolesa ako percentuálny podiel záťaže zodpovedajúci indexu nosnosti
 Radiálna pneumatika min-1
 Diagonálna pneumatika (bias-ply) min-1
 7 h.
 16 h.
 24 h.
 122 alebo viac
 F
 100
 100
 66 %
 84 %
 101 %
 G
 125
 100
 J
 150
 125
 K
 175
 150
 L
 200
 —
 M
 225
 —
 121 alebo menej
 F
 100
 100
 G
 125
 125
 J
 150
 150
 K
 175
 175
 L
 200
 175
 70 %
 4 h.
 88 %
 6 h.
 106 %
 M
 250
 200
 75 %
 97 %
 114 %
 N
 275
 —
 75 %
 97 %
 114 %
 P
 300
 —
 75 %
 97 %
 114 %
 Poznámky:
 (1)
 Pneumatiky „na špeciálne použitie“ (pozri bod 2.1.3. tohto predpisu) by mali byť skúšané pri rýchlosti rovnajúcej sa 85 % rýchlosti predpísanej pre rovnocenné pneumatiky normálnych typov.
 (2)
 Pneumatiky s indexom nosnosti 122 alebo viac v rýchlostných kategóriách N alebo P a doplnkovým označením „LT“ alebo „C“ uvedeným v bode 3.1.13. tohto predpisu sa musia skúšať rovnakým programom ako je uvedený v tabuľke vyššie pre pneumatiky s indexom nosnosti 121 alebo menším.
 Dodatok 2
 Vzťah medzi indexom tlaku a jednotkami tlaku
 Index tlaku („PSI“)
 Bar
 kPa
 20
 1,4
 140
 25
 1,7
 170
 30
 2,1
 210
 35
 2,4
 240
 40
 2,8
 280
 45
 3,1
 310
 50
 3,4
 340
 55
 3,8
 380
 60
 4,1
 410
 65
 4,5
 450
 70
 4,8
 480
 75
 5,2
 520
 80
 5,5
 550
 85
 5,9
 590
 90
 6,2
 620
 95
 6,6
 660
 100
 6,9
 690
 105
 7,2
 720
 110
 7,6
 760
 115
 7,9
 790
 120
 8,3
 830
 125
 8,6
 860
 130
 9,0
 900
 135
 9,3
 930
 140
 9,7
 970
 145
 10,0
 1 000
 150
 10,3
 1 030
 ...
 ...
 ...
 PRÍLOHA VIII
 Zmena nosnosti v závislosti od rýchlosti radiálnych a diagonálnych pneumatík pre úžitkové vozidlá
 (pozri body 2.27. a 2.29.)
 Zmena nosnosti (%)
 Rýchlosť (km/h)
 Všetky indexy nosnosti
 Indexy nosnosti ≥ 122 (1)
 Indexy nosnosti ≤ 121 (1)
 Symbol rýchlostnej kategórie
 Symbol rýchlostnej kategórie
 Symbol rýchlostnej kategórie
 F
 G
 J
 K
 L
 M
 L
 M
 N
 P (2)
 0
 + 150
 + 150
 + 150
 + 150
 + 150
 + 150
 + 110
 + 110
 + 110
 + 110
 5
 + 110
 + 110
 + 110
 + 110
 + 110
 + 110
 +90
 +90
 +90
 +90
 10
 +80
 +80
 +80
 +80
 +80
 +80
 +75
 +75
 +75
 +75
 15
 +65
 +65
 +65
 +65
 +65
 +65
 +60
 +60
 +60
 +60
 20
 +50
 +50
 +50
 +50
 +50
 +50
 +50
 +50
 +50
 +50
 25
 +35
 +35
 +35
 +35
 +35
 +35
 +42
 +42
 +42
 +42
 30
 +25
 +25
 +25
 +25
 +25
 +25
 +35
 +35
 +35
 +35
 35
 +19
 +19
 +19
 +19
 +19
 +19
 +29
 +29
 +29
 +29
 40
 +15
 +15
 +15
 +15
 +15
 +15
 +25
 +25
 +25
 +25
 45
 +13
 +13
 +13
 +13
 +13
 +13
 +22
 +22
 +22
 +22
 50
 +12
 +12
 +12
 +12
 +12
 +12
 +20
 +20
 +20
 +20
 55
 +11
 +11
 +11
 +11
 +11
 +11
 +17,5
 +17,5
 +17,5
 +17,5
 60
 +10
 +10
 +10
 +10
 +10
 +10
 +15,0
 +15,0
 +15,0
 +15,0
 65
 +7,5
 +8,5
 +8,5
 +8,5
 +8,5
 +8,5
 +13,5
 +13,5
 +13,5
 +13,5
 70
 +5,0
 +7,0
 +7,0
 +7,0
 +7,0
 +7,0
 +12,5
 +12,5
 +12,5
 +12,5
 75
 +2,5
 +5,5
 +5,5
 +5,5
 +5,5
 +5,5
 +11,0
 +11,0
 +11,0
 +11,0
 80
 0
 +4,0
 +4,0
 +4,0
 +4,0
 +4,0
 +10,0
 +10,0
 +10,0
 +10,0
 85
 -3
 +2,0
 +3,0
 +3,0
 +3,0
 +3,0
 +8,5
 +8,5
 +8,5
 +8,5
 90
 -6
 0
 +2,0
 +2,0
 +2,0
 +2,0
 +7,5
 +7,5
 +7,5
 +7,5
 95
 -10
 -2,5
 +1,0
 +1,0
 +1,0
 +1,0
 +6,5
 +6,5
 +6,5
 +6,5
 100
 -15
 -5
 0
 0
 0
 0
 +5,0
 +5,0
 +5,0
 +5,0
 105
 -8
 -2
 0
 0
 0
 +3,75
 +3,75
 +3,75
 +3,75
 110
 -13
 -4
 0
 0
 0
 +2,5
 +2,5
 +2,5
 +2,5
 115
 -7
 -3
 0
 0
 +1,25
 +1,25
 +1,25
 +1,25
 120
 -12
 -7
 0
 0
 0
 0
 0
 0
 125
 0
 -2,5
 0
 0
 0
 130
 0
 -5,0
 0
 0
 0
 135
 -7,5
 -2,5
 0
 0
 140
 -10
 -5
 0
 0
 145
 -7,5
 -2,5
 0
 150
 -10,0
 -5,0
 0
 155
 -7,5
 -2,5
 160
 -10,0
 -5,0
 (1) Indexy nosnosti vzťahujúce sa na jednoduchú montáž.
 (2) Zmeny nosnosti nie sú dovolené pri rýchlostiach nad 160 km/h. Pre rýchlostnú kategóriu „Q“ a vyššiu rýchlostnú kategóriu zodpovedajúcu symbolu rýchlostnej kategórie (pozri bod 2.28.2.) sa udáva maximálna dovolená rýchlosť pre pneumatiku.
 PRÍLOHA IX
 OZNÁMENIE
 Zvýšenie parametrov prevádzkového popisu na účely obnovenia v súlade s predpisom č. 109
 [maximálny formát A4 (210 × 297 mm)]
 Vydal (názov a adresa výrobcu pneumatiky): ...
 Vyhlásenie:
 Pneumatika, ktorá zodpovedá týmto podrobnostiam bola homologizovaná na prevádzku pri vyššom stupni prevádzkového popisu ako pneumatika pôvodne homologizovaná. Preto je povolené, s výhradou akýchkoľvek obmedzení uvedených v bode 4.1.1 nižšie., aby pneumatika s pôvodným prevádzkovým popisom a homologizačným číslom bola obnovená pre prevádzkový popis so zvýšenými parametrami.
 Taktiež sa dohodlo, že táto informácia môže byť vydaná homologizačným orgánom ktorejkoľvek výrobnej jednotke obnovených pneumatík, ktorá je homologizovaná v súlade s predpisom č. 109.
 1. Názov alebo obchodná značka výrobcu na pneumatike: ...
 2. Označenie výrobcu pre daný typ, model alebo konštrukciu pneumatiky: ...
 3. Označenie rozmeru plášťa: ...
 3.1. Kategória použitia (normálna, na jazdu na snehu alebo špeciálna): ...
 4. Prevádzkový popis
 4.1. Pôvodná pneumatika: ...
 Homologizácia č. podľa predpisu č. 54. ...
 Udelil: ...
 4.1.1. Podľa potreby, výrobný podnik, kde sa vyrábali pneumatiky vhodné na vylepšenie, príslušné obdobia výroby a prostriedky identifikácie jedného alebo oboch týchto údajov:
 4.2. Vylepšená pneumatika: ...
 Homologizácia č. podľa predpisu č. 54. ...
 Udelil: ...
 5. Autorizované (zástupca výrobcu pneumatiky):
 5.1. Meno (veľkými tlačenými písmenami): ...
 5.2. Oddelenie: ...
 5.3. Podpis: ...