jurisdiction: US

text:
The opinion of the court proceeds upon the theory that the specialty at bar became enforceable against any of its several subscribers when the aggregate sum of the subscriptions of the several subscribers amounted to $750,000, without reference to the total that had been deposited in money and notes with the bank before the specified day. It is submitted that there was error in so construing the contract, and that the error was founded in a failure to recognize that a right of action in the bank against a subscriber depended upon the existence not only (1) of a total subscription of not less than $750,000, but also (2) of the payment or deposit in funds, (3) by a given day, either of that amount or of that amount less the particular subscription of the severally bound subscriber, who had not performed his primary contractual promise to pay. In other words, the cause of action must exist at the time suit is brought. To sustain the action there must be not only the breach of the primary contractual obligation to pay, which gave rise to the obligor's secondary duty to pay damages in the amount of the covenant to pay, but, in addition, it is indispensable that the secondary duty continue to exist. If there be operative facts contemporaneous with the origin of the secondary duty, or subsequently occurring, whose nonexistence is a condition precedent to the plaintiff's right to a judgment, although not precedent to plaintiff's right to payment as covenanted, the action *Page 238
 will not prevail. It will be found that the allegations of the declaration aver the operative facts which established an affirmative defense. Infra.
 With these preliminary principles in mind, the terms of the contract must be interpreted and construed in connection with all the circumstances set forth in the declaration. The bank was in a gravely embarrassed financial position. It had been notified by the bank commissioner that it would be closed by a fixed date, unless by that time a sufficient fund would be procured and made available as a guaranty of the depositors and creditors of the bank. No peril could be greater nor more imminent. Not only must an amount be subscribed which would be sufficient to restore the liquidity and capital assets of the bank, but the whole amount subscribed must be raised and actually be delivered in hand to the bank by the prescribed date, because a less amount would be inadequate and a deferred delivery would be too late to avert the impending disaster. So, the fundamental requisites of a remedial contract were the amount to be subscribed; the delivery to the bank by subscribers of the amount severally agreed by payment on or before the time specified, in money or in promissory notes, which had been secured to the satisfaction of the committee whose members had solicited the subscriptions and who were representatives of the subscribers in certain of the details of the transaction.
 The amount and its delivery within the time designated were the three conditions precedent whose fulfillment were indispensably necessary to the creation of the contemplated guaranty fund in accordance with the contract of the subscribers. From May 26th, 1932, the date of the subscription, until June 10th, 1932, the bank was made the depositary of the money and the approved promissory notes which the contract provided should be individually delivered to the bank by the subscribers. June 10th, 1932, was the last day on which deposits could be made and the conditions precedent be performed, because the contract so specified, and time is of the essence *Page 239
 of this mercantile contract. Gill McMahon v. Weller,52 Md. 8, 14; Gilman v. Smith, 71 Md. 171, 173, 17 A. 1035; Bohn Mfg.Co. v. Lewis, 45 Minn. 164, 47 N.W. 652 The fulfillment of these conditions precedent was necessary before the plan of relief became effective so as to make the money and notes deposited available as the specified guaranty fund.
 It is submitted that this intention is clearly expressed by the paper writing which was signed by the parties, and is in complete harmony with the design of its signers and the circumstances of its execution. The introductory recital prevents a doubt. It declares that the subscribers deem it "necessary" that the "sum" of $750,000 "must" be made "available" as a "Guaranty Fund" upon the "terms and conditions" of the body of the contract of subscription and for the purpose of substituting it for an existing guaranty fund. Nor is this dominant intention inconsistent with the later clause that: "This agreement shall not be binding" unless the aggregate of such subscriptions shall be not less than $750,000. This clause must relate to an aggregate of $750,000 either in the promises to pay or in theperformance of the promises to pay. If the first alternative be true, it is limited to the promises, and, so, would not exclude other conditions which relate to the performance. If, however, the clause has reference to performance, it would necessarily embrace the promise from which the performance flowed. Therefore, in either construction, the conditions precedent would be unaffected. However, performance was of the substance, and it should be noted that the word "subscriptions" is employed in the document in the twofold sense of denoting the promise to pay, which is the more common usage, and the performance of the promise, that is the delivery of money and approved notes in payment of the amount subscribed. Thames Tunnel Co. v. Sheldon,
 6 Barn. Cres. 341, 347, 348.
 It is with this second meaning that the term is used in paragraphs preceding the clause under consideration. For instance, in the phrase, "Until the repayment of said *Page 240
 subscriptions as aforesaid, said subscriptions shall constitute a guaranty fund for the protection of the depositors and creditors," the term "subscriptions" indisputably signifies the money and notes delivered that together constituted the fund whose existence depended on performance. By reading the term as meaning a fund raised through sums of money subscribed by a number of persons, a construction is given which is sensible and consistent with the objects and provisions of the contract. So, no matter how viewed, the clause in question does not limit the conditions precedent to the one whose performance was the procurement of promises to pay in the aggregate amount of $750,000.
 The money and notes deposited on or before June 10th were provisionally in the custody of the bank, which so held them until that date or the earlier fulfillment of the other conditions of delivery and amount. If, on or before the day named, all the conditions precedent were met, and there had been deposited with the bank the money and accepted notes in the aggregate sum of $750,000, the contemplated guaranty fund would have been created; the bank would have ceased to serve as depositary, and would have become a trustee to hold and use the money and notes so deposited as a dedicated "guaranty fund for the protection of the depositors and creditors of the Hagerstown Bank and Trust Company and to prevent an impairment of the capital of said institution." Perry on Trusts, secs. 242-245;McKee v. Lamon, 159 U.S. 317, 322, 16 S. Ct. 11, 40 L. Ed. 165;Rogers Locomotive Machine Works v. Kelley, 88 N.Y. 234, 235;Nash v. Commonwealth, 174 Mass. 335, 54 N.E. 865. Subject to these uses, the rights of the subscribers were made superior to the stockholders; and the subscribers were ultimately to be repaid, within the period fixed by the committee, their respective subscriptions, at their option, either wholly or partly in money "or in the shares of stock of a corporation now existing or to be hereafter formed."
 If, however, the conditions precedent were not fulfilled *Page 241
 by the day prescribed, the trust did not arise; the bank acquired no title to the fund deposited, and had the duty of returning to every one of the subscribers the money or notes which had been deposited with the bank. Addison on Contracts, vol. 3, sec. 1345; Halsbury's Laws of England (2nd Ed.) vol. 7, title Contract, sec. 396, p. 287; Machen on Corporations, vol. 1, sec. 415; Nockels v. Crosby, 3 Barn. Cres., 814; Moore v.Garwood, 4 Exch. 681; Walstab v. Spotteswoode, 15 Mees.
 Wels., 501; Mowatt v. Londesborough, 4 El. Bl. 1; Johnson v.Goslett, 3 C.B.(N.S.) 569; Ward v. Londesborough, 12 C.B. 252;Ashpitel v. Sercombe, 5 Exch. 147; Kremen v. Rubin,139 Md. 682, 690, 116 A. 640; Carter v. Carter, 14 Pick. (Mass.) 424;Hudson v. West, 189 Pa. 491, 42 A. 190; Fitzwilliam v.Travis, 65 Ill. App. 183; Bradford v. Harris, 77 Md. 153, 26 A. 186; Capper's Case, 1 Sim. (N.S.) 178; Aldham v. Brown, 7 El. Bl. 164, 2 E. E. 398; Bither v. Packard, 115 Me. 306, 98 A. 929, 932.
 The primary obligation of the subscriber A was to pay his subscription. He would have discharged this obligation by making his payment to the bank as a depositary at any time from May 26th, provided it were not later than June 10th. Until the expiration of this last day the subscriber was not in default. If, on the day mentioned, the subscriber had not paid and did not then pay, he committed a breach of his primary obligation, but his secondary remedial obligation to pay the amount of his subscription in an action of debt on his several covenant depended upon the act or performance of the other several subscribers, because if the aggregate of the money and approved notes which had been deposited with the bank on or before June 10th would, with the payment of the defaulting subscriber A's subscription, have totaled or exceeded the sum of $750,000, all the conditions precedent of amount of the subscriptions, and the payment of all the amounts subscribed by the time named, would have been fulfilled; and for his failure to perform, the defaulting subscriber would have been liable in an action of debt on his covenant to pay, since *Page 242
 it was his breach which had occasioned the failure of the conditions precedent to be performed. See Scarlett v. Academy ofMusic, 46 Md. 132, 153. If, on the other hand, the aggregate of money and notes deposited on or before June 10th, together with the amount of the subscription which the defaulting subscriber and defendant A had failed to deposit, was not equal to as much as $750,000, the two conditions precedent of the payment of the fund subscribed by the time named were not met, and the failure of the conditions precedent was not due to the breach of the defaulting subscriber nor to be remedied by an action against the particular defaulter by suit, since the failure of the conditions prescribed would still independently subsist and the subscriber would not be bound because of the refusal of other several subscribers to perform as had been severally agreed. In the first assumed combination of facts, the default of the subscriber A would be the breach which would cause the fund paid in by the date specified to fail to meet the conditions precedent necessary for the contract to become operative in the creation of a trust for the uses intended. In the second assumed combination of facts, the conditions precedent would not be fulfilled and the trust would therefore not arise, whether or not the subscriber A had fully performed his primary obligation, because of the distinct default of one or more other subscribers in his or their performance of the primary several obligations to pay as agreed. The subscriber A, as well as all the other subscribers, was not jointly nor jointly and severally bound, but severally bound, so, in the absence of a wrongful conspiracy or confederation of subscriber A in the default of the other subscribers, A would not be affected by the several defaults which had resulted without any participation on A's part. Anson on Contracts (Am. Ed. Corbin) secs. 334, 335; Williston on Contracts (2nd Ed.) sec. 323. For the same reason, if either waiver or estoppel should prevent another, or all other, subscribers from relying on a discharge from the contract because of a nonperformance of conditions *Page 243
 precedent, the subscriber A would not be affected by such waiver or estoppel, unless he was included therein by reason of his participation in or authorization of the facts which constituted the waiver or estoppel. The terms of the contract are specific that the obligations of every subscriber "shall be several and not joint and no one shall be liable for the obligations of any other." Mechem on Agency (2nd Ed.) vol. 1, sec. 725. The independent breach of one subscriber in a several contract is not imputed to any other subscriber. Little v. Edwards, 69 Md. 499, 508, 509, 16 A. 134; United States v. Knox, 102 U.S. 422, 26 L. Ed. 216; Coyle v. Taunton etc. Co., 216 Mass. 156,103 N.E. 288. So, the nonperformance by other several subscribers to the contract of that which was a condition precedent to the existence of the secondary obligation, and to the remedy against the subscriber A, effected a discharge of the subscriber A from his primary obligation to pay his subscription. There are many analogous illustrations of conditions precedent whose nonperformance operated to discharge the promisor from his promise. Dalrymple v. Lauman, 23 Md. 376, 398-402; Webb v.Baltimore Eastern Shore R. Co., 77 Md. 92, 26 A. 113; Taggartv. Western Md. R. Co., 24 Md. 563; Baltimore Drum Point R.Co. v. Pumphrey, 74 Md. 86, 21 A. 559; Portage Co. v. Wisconsinetc. R. Co., 121 Mass. 460; Central Turnpike Corporation v.Valentine, 10 Pick. (Mass.) 142; Hughes v. Antietam Mfg. Co.,34 Md. 316, 332; Fiery v. Emmert, 36 Md. 464, 474; Hager v.Cleveland, 36 Md. 476, 490, 491; Garling v. Baechtel,41 Md. 305, 322; Musgrave v. Morrison, 54 Md. 161, 164; Gettysburgetc. Bank v. Brown, 95 Md. 367, 385, 386, 52 A. 975; Morgan v.Landstreet, 109 Md. 558, 588, 72 A. 399; Webb v. Moeller,87 Conn. 138, 87 A. 277; Sherrod v. Duffy, 160 Mich. 488, 125 N.W. 366; Brown v. Dibble's Estate, 65 Mich. 520, 32 N.W. 656;People's Ferry Co. v. Balch, 8 Gray 303; State Bank ofIndiana v. Cook, 125 Iowa 111, 100 N.W. 72.
 In the case at bar the impossibility of performance of *Page 244
 the conditions precedent to the defendant's secondary or remedial obligation to pay a subscription of $10,000 in the instant case is shown by the allegations of the plaintiffs that "almost all the persons who executed said Subscription Agreement met their obligations thereunder promptly and paid the amount of their said subscriptions in cash or evidenced the same by their promissory notes properly secured as provided in said Guaranty Fund Contract; and that the amounts so promptly paid thereon in cash amount to over $300,000, and the amounts evidenced and secured as aforesaid by promissory notes on account of their subscriptions amounted in the aggregate to over $300,000."
 Disregarding the fact that it does not appear that the money and notes were deposited on or before June 10th, the aggregate of these deposits was $600,000, which, with the subscription of the defendants of $10,000, was far from the $750,000 which the contract exacted should be in the hands of the depositary on or before June 10th. Under such circumstances it would have been a futile gesture for the defendants to have paid or deposited $10,000 in money or notes by the day set, since the depositary would have been bound to have refunded the deposit, because the requisite amount of $750,000 had not been raised. Supra. Here the accrued rights of action for a breach of the defendant's primary obligation is discharged by the subsequent inability of the bank to perform. The principle is thus stated by Williston: "It may seem that where performance on one side of a contract is precedent to that on the other, and the time for the prior performance has arrived, and no defense then existing, a right of action has arisen, this right of action cannot afterwards be destroyed except by payment, or release, or accord and satisfaction. Such, however, is not the case. Circumstances may arise subsequently which would justify the recovery back of the prior performance, if it had been given, and, therefore, if it had not been given but a cause of action for it arisen, to avoid circuity of action the court will deny recovery." Williston onContracts, secs. 884, 885; Machen *Page 245 on Corporations, sec. 415; Bradford v. Harris, 77 Md. 153, 158-161, 26 A. 186. See Corbin, Conditions in the Law ofContract (1918) 28 Yale Law Journal, 739; Selected Readings onLaw of Contracts, p. 871.
 For these reasons, which apply equally to Nos. 46, 47, and 48, I am of the opinion that the demurrers were rightly sustained and the judgments should have been affirmed.


type: contracts

jurisdiction: EU

text:
 Dôležité právne oznámenie
 |
 21991A1211(01)
 Úradný vestník L 340 , 11/12/1991 S. 0002 - 0015
 Rámcová dohoda o spoluprácimedzi Európskym hospodárskym spoločenstvom a Spojenými štátmi mexickýmiRADA EURÓPSKYCH SPOLOČENSTIEV,na jednej strane,VLÁDA SPOJENÝCH ŠTÁTOV MEXICKÝCH,na druhej strane,BERÚC DO ÚVAHY tradičné väzby priateľstva medzi členskými štátmi Európskeho hospodárskeho spoločenstva a Spojenými štátmi mexickými;S VEDOMÍM spoločnej vôle Európskeho hospodárskeho spoločenstva, ďalej len "spoločenstvo", a Spojených štátov mexických, ďalej len "Mexiko", rozšíriť a diverzifikovať obchod medzi nimi a upevniť spoluprácu v oblasti obchodu, hospodárskych záležitostí, vedy a technológií a finančných záležitostí;BERÚC DO ÚVAHY skutočnosť, že hlavným užívateľom spolupráce je človek a že rešpektovanie jeho práv by sa preto malo podporiť,V PRESVEDČENÍ, že zmluvné strany a vzťahy medzi nimi sa vyvinuli nad rámec pôsobnosti Dohody o spolupráci uzatvorenej medzi nimi v roku 1975;UZNÁVAJÚC pozitívne dôsledky procesu reformy a modernizácie hospodárstva v Mexiku pre obchodné a hospodárske vzťahy medzi zmluvnými stranami;VÍTAJÚC inštitucionalizáciu dialógu medzi krajinami zoskupenia konferencie z Rio de Janeiro a spoločenstvom a jeho členskými štátmi prostredníctvom Rímskej deklarácie z 20. decembra 1990;PREHLASUJÚC, že základným cieľom tejto dohody je konsolidácia, zintenzívnenie a oživenie vzťahov medzi zmluvnými stranami pre ich obojstranný prospech;PRIHLIADAJÚC NA dané rozdiely v hospodárskom rozvoji zmluvných strán;SO ŽELANÍM ABY prispievali k rozvoju medzinárodných ekonomických vzťahov;S VEDOMÍM medzinárodného významu konsolidácie jednotného európskeho trhu vo svetovom kontexte;BERÚC DO ÚVAHY, že spoločenstvo a jeho členské štáty prikladajú veľký význam podpore obchodu a hospodárskej spolupráci s rozvojovými krajinami veľký význam v záujme pomoci a upevnenia ich hospodárstiev;V PRESVEDČENÍ o význame pravidiel a princípov Všeobecnej dohody o clách a obchode (GATT) s cieľom otvoreného a nepretržite sa rozširujúceho medzinárodného trhu a potvrdzujúc záväzky vyplývajúce z tejto Všeobecnej dohody o clách a obchode;BERÚC DO ÚVAHY význam, ktorý obe zmluvné strany venujú ochrane životného prostredia, sú odhodlané zdvojnásobiť svoje úsilie na zabezpečenie, aby táto problematika bola plne začlenená do akejkoľvek rozvojovej koncepcie, pričom sa zohľadnia jej miestne a globálne dôsledky;BERÚC DO ÚVAHY význam uľahčenia zapojenia do spolupráce jednotlivcov a subjektov, ktorých sa spolupráca priamo dotýka, najmä hospodárskych účastníkov trhu a orgánov, ktoré ich zastupujú,ROZHODLI SA uzatvoriť túto dohodu a s týmto cieľom vymenovali za svojich splnomocnených zástupcov:RADA EURÓPSKYCH SPOLOČENSTIEV:Jacques F. Poos,Minister zahraničných vecí Luxemburského veľkovojvodstva,Úradujúci predseda Rady Európskych spoločenstiev;Abel Matutes,Člen Komisie Európskych spoločenstiev;VLÁDA SPOJENÝCH ŠTÁTOV MEXICKÝCH:Fernando Solana Morales,Minister zahraničných vecí Spojených štátov mexických,KTORÍ, po výmene svojich plných mocí formálne uznaných za správne a náležité,DOHODLI SA TAKTO:Článok 1Obe zmluvné strany sa týmto zaväzujú k tomu, že vzťahom medzi sebou dodajú novú silu. Na dosiahnutie tohto základného cieľa sa rozhodli podporovať najmä rozvoj spolupráce v oblasti obchodu, investícií, financií a technológií, pričom sa zoberie do úvahy osobitná situácia Mexika ako rozvojovej krajiny.KAPITOLA IHospodárska spoluprácaČlánok 21. Zmluvné strany sa s prihliadnutím na ich vzájomný záujem strednodobé a dlhodobé hospodárske ciele zaväzujú k rozvoju hospodárskej spolupráce v čo najširšom rozsahu. Cieľmi tejto spolupráce sú najmä:a) všeobecné oživenie a diverzifikácia hospodárskych článkov medzi zmluvnými stranami;b) prispievanie k udržateľnému rozvoju ich ekonomík a životnému štandarduc) otvorenie nových zdrojov dodávok a nových trhov;d) podporovanie prílivu investícií a technológií;e) podporovanie spolupráce medzi hospodárskymi účastníkmi trh, najmä medzi malými a strednými podnikmi;f) stanovenie podmienok prospešných pre tvorbu pracovných miest;g) ochrana a zlepšenie životného prostredia;h) podporovanie opatrení pre rozvoj vidieka;i) podporovanie pokroku v progresívnom rozvoji vedy a technológie.2. Bez toho, aby boli niektoré oblasti vylúčené už predom, zmluvné strany spoločnou dohodou stanovili oblasti, ktoré sa v ich spoločnom záujme a vzhľadom na ich príslušné kapacitné možnosti zahrnú pod hospodársku spoluprácu. Spolupráca sa zameria najmä na:a) priemysel;b) duševné a priemyselné vlastníctvo, právne predpisy a normy kvality;c) prevod technológií;d) agropriemysel;e) rybný priemysel a rybolov;f) plánovanie energií a ich účinné využívanie;g) ochrana životného prostredia;h) hospodárenie s prírodným bohatstvom;i) služby vrátane finančných služieb, cestovného ruchu, dopravy, telekomunikácií a spracovania údajov;j) výmena informácií o menových otázkach.3. V záujme dosiahnutia cieľov hospodárskej spolupráce sa zmluvné strany vynasnažia, v súlade s ich vnútroštátnou legislatívou, podporovať činnosti zahrňujúce:a) upevňovanie kontaktov medzi zmluvnými stranami, najmä prostredníctvom usporiadania konferencií, seminárov, obchodných a priemyselných misií, "podnikateľských týždňov", všeobecných a rezortných obchodných veľtrhov a mapovacích misií zisťovania faktov s cieľom zvýšenia obchodnej výmeny a investícií;b) účasť podnikov spoločenstva na veľtrhoch a výstavách v Mexiku a naopak;c) technickú pomoc, zvlášť zahrňujúcu zabezpečenie odborníkov a zorganizovanie špecifických štúdií;d) zakladanie spoločných podnikov (joint venture);e) spoluprácu medzi finančnými inštitúciami;f) výmenu dôležitých informácií, najmä prístupu k súčasným a budúcim databázam;g) vytvorenie sietí hospodárskych účastníkov trhu, najmä priemyselníkov.Spolupráca medzi finančnými inštitúciamiČlánok 3V súlade s potrebami a v rámci hraníc svojich programov a právnej legislatívy sa zmluvné strany vynasnažia podporovať spoluprácu medzi finančnými inštitúciami prostredníctvom opatrení na podporu:- výmeny informácií a skúseností v oblastiach spoločného záujmu. Táto spolupráca sa bude realizovať, okrem iného, organizovaním seminárov, konferencií a workshopov,- výmenou odborníkov,- zabezpečením technickej pomoci,- výmenou informácií v oblasti štatistík a metód.Článok 4So zreteľom na ciele ekonomickej spolupráce sa zmluvné strany vynasnažia v rámci ich vnútroštátnych právnych predpisov podporovať uzatváranie dohôd o zamedzení dvojitého zdanenia medzi členskými štátmi spoločenstva a Mexikom a podporovať výmenu informácií v tejto problematike.Priemyselná spoluprácaČlánok 5Zmluvné strany budú podporovať rozšírenie a diverzifikovanie mexickej výrobnej základne v rezortoch priemyslu a služieb, pričom usmernia činnosti tejto spolupráce osobitne na malé a stredné podniky a v mene týchto podnikov podporia kroky na uľahčenie prístupu ku kapitálovým zdrojom, trhom a vhodnej technológii, a tiež podporia činnosti spoločného podnikania, rozvoj obchodu medzi zmluvnými stranami a spoluprácu na tretích trhoch.Za týmto účelom zmluvné strany podporia, v rámci svojich zodpovedností, podporia projekty a operácie propagujúce spoluprácu medzi podnikateľmi, ako sú: spoločné podniky, čiastkové zmluvy, transfery technológií, licencie, aplikovaný výskum a udeľovanie práv na predaj výrobkov (franchising).InvestícieČlánok 6V záujme dosiahnutia cieľov tejto dohody sa zmluvné strany dohodli, že budú, pokiaľ to bude možné, podporovať vhodné opatrenia na rozvoj a udržanie priaznivého, predvídateľného a stabilného investičného prostredia. Zmluvné strany potvrdzujú potrebu súkromných investorov na oboch stranách, v záujme zvyšovania ekonomickej interakcie. V tejto súvislosti sa obe zmluvné strany zaväzujú preskúmať, v rámci svojich zodpovedností a v súlade s ich vnútroštátnymi právnymi predpismi a politikami realizácia operácií a mechanizmov v súlade s odsekom 38 Rímskej deklarácie o vzťahoch medzi Európskym hospodárskym spoločenstvom a Rio zoskupením. To isté sa vzťahuje na dohody o zamedzení dvojitého zdanenia.Zmluvné strany sa vynasnažia podporiť mechanizmy a operácie na propagáciu investícií s cieľom identifikovať a napomáhať rozvoju nových príležitostí a spolupracovať pri organizácií propagačných podujatí vrátane seminárov, výstav a obchodných ciest a pri umožňovaní hospodárskym účastníkom trhu vypracovať investičné projekty.Článok 7V rámci hraníc ich zodpovedností, politík a možností zmluvné strany podporia poskytnutie finančnej podpory a technickej pomoci potrebnej na rozvoj spoločných investícií, ktoré sú v záujme oboch strán, zvlášť medzi malými a strednými podnikmi oboch strán.Technologický vývoj a duševné vlastníctvoČlánok 8Na účely dosiahnutia účinnej spolupráce medzi podnikmi v Mexiku a podnikmi v spoločenstve v oblastiach prevodu technológií, udeľovania licencií priemyselného a ostatného duševného vlastníctva, spoločných investícií a financovania rizikového kapitálu sa zmluvné strany dohodli, že:- identifikujú odvetvia alebo odvetvia priemyslu, na ktoré sa spolupráca zameria a prostriedky podpory priemyselnej spolupráce na ťažké technológie,- budú spolupracovať pri podpore mobilizácie finančných prostriedkov na spoločné projekty medzi podnikmi v Mexiku a podnikmi v spoločenstve, ktorých cieľom je využívať technologické know-how v priemysle- budú podporovať školenie kvalifikovaného technického výskumného personálu,- budú podporovať inováciu prostredníctvom výmeny informácií o programoch oboch strán, ktoré vykonáva každá strana na tento účel, pravidelných výmen skúseností z riadenia inovačných programov a prostredníctvom výmeny schém a systémov v inštitúciách zmluvných strán pre ich úradníkov, ktorí sú zodpovední za inovačný proces.Článok 9Zmluvné strany sa zaväzujú, že v rámci svojej právnej legislatívy a politík zabezpečia, poskytnutie vhodnej, účinnej a zvýšenej ochrany v oblasti práv duševného vlastníctva, vrátane obchodných a priemyselných práv, autorských práv a značiek pôvodu. Ďalej sa dohodli na podpore uzavretia dohôd v týchto oblastiach a na čo najväčšom uľahčení prístupu k databankám a databázam.Spolupráca v oblasti noriemČlánok 10Bez toho, aby boli dotknuté ich medzinárodné záväzky, vzhľadom na ich zodpovednosť a v súlade so svojim právom, zmluvné strany podniknú kroky na zníženie rozdielov v sústavách hmotnosti a mier, štandardizácii a certifikácii prostredníctvom propagácie používania kompatibilných systémov noriem a certifikácie. S týmto cieľom podporia najmä:- založenie prepojení medzi odborníkmi na uľahčenie výmeny informácií a štúdií o hmotnostiach a mierach, normách a kontrole kvality, propagácií a certifikácií,- podporu výmeny a kontaktov medzi orgánmi a inštitúciami, ktoré sa v týchto oblastiach špecializujú,- podporu opatrení zameraných na dosiahnutie vzájomného uznávania systémov kalibrácie a certifikácie kvality a ekvivalencie noriem v oblastiach zahrnutých pod reguláciou,- podporu výmeny informácií a kontaktov v oblastiach vzájomného záujmu, osobitne v oblasti zdravia, požiadaviek na životné prostredie a bezpečnosť, požiadaviek týkajúcich sa obchodných informácií, technických požiadaviek týkajúcich sa noriem a certifikácie kvality a praxe spojenej s obchodom v rámci spoločenstva,- rozvoj technickej pomoci v spojení s hmotnosťami a mierami a kalibráciou meracích štandardov a v spojení s programami propagácie kvality,- konzultačné porady na zabezpečenie toho, aby štandardizácia nevytvárala prekážky v rozvoji obchodu.KAPITOLA IIObchodná spoluprácaČlánok 11V súlade so Všeobecnou dohodou o clách a obchode si zmluvné strany navzájom udelia doložku najvyššých výhod.Zmluvné strany potvrdzujú svoju vôľu obchodovať medzi sebou v súlade s touto dohodou.Rozšírenie obchoduČlánok 12Zmluvné strany prehlasujú svoj spoločný zámer posilniť svoje obchodné vzťahy a zaviazať sa k podpore, v rámci súčasnej legislatívy každej zo strán, rozšírenia a diverzifikácii obchodu medzi nimi.Za týmto účelom sa zmluvné strany zaväzujú k výmene informácií v čo najpodrobnejšej forme.Článok 13Zmluvné strany sa dohodli na podpore výmeny informácií a konaní konzultácií týkajúcich sa otázok taríf, zdravotných a technických požiadaviek, zákonov a obchodných zvyklostí, akýchkoľvek antidumpingových alebo vyrovnávacích ciel, ktoré môžu uplatňovať.Článok 14Bez toho, aby boli dotknuté ich práva a povinnosti vyplývajúce zo Všeobecnej dohody o clách a obchode, zmluvné strany sa zaväzujú konzultovať, v prípade akéhokoľvek sporu, ktorý môže vzniknúť vo vzájomnom obchode.Ak jedna zo zmluvných strán požiada o takúto poradu, táto porada sa uskutoční pri najbližšej príležitosti. Zmluvné strany, ktoré o ňu žiadajú, poskytnú druhej zmluvnej strane všetky potrebné informácie na podrobné preskúmanie situácie.Prostredníctvom týchto konzultácií sa pokúsia o čo najrýchlejšie vyriešenie obchodných sporov.Článok 15Obe zmluvné strany sa zaväzujú, že ak v obchode medzi nimi vzniknú podozrenia o dumpingu alebo o dotáciách, ktoré povedú k vyšetrovaniu príslušnými orgánmi, v súvislosti s predmetnými prípadmi preskúmajú požiadavky podané druhou zmluvnou stranou.Príslušné orgány zmluvných strán budú na žiadosť zainteresovaných strán informovať o základných skutočnostiach a postojoch, ktoré poslúžia ako základ k riešeniu. Tieto informácie sa poskytnú zainteresovaným stranám pred dosiahnutím konečných záverov z vyšetrovania a v dostatočnom predstihu, aby tieto strany mohli obhajovať svoje záujmy.Pred uložením končených antidumpingových a vyrovnávacích ciel sa zmluvné strany vynaložia maximálne úsilie, aby našli konštruktívne riešenie daného problému.Článok 16Zmluvné strany sa dohodli na rozvíjaní kontaktov a spolupráce medzi ich hospodárskymi účastníkmi trhu a inštitúciami, s cieľom umožnenia vzniku konkrétnych projektov hospodárskej spolupráce, ktoré môžu prispieť k rozvoju a k rozšíreniu ich obchodu.Obe zmluvné strany uznávajú dôležitú rolu, ktorú zohrávajú obchodné organizácie, ako sú Obchodná Rada Mexika a Európskeho spoločenstva pri navrhovaní rozšírenia a upevnenia obojstranných obchodných vzťahov a opätovne potvrdzujú svoj záujem o podporu práce týchto organizácií.Článok 171. V záujme posilnenia aktívnejšej spolupráce v oblasti obchodu sa zmluvné strany zaväzujú, že podniknú kroky zahrňujúce:- propagáciu stretnutí, vzájomnej výmeny a nadväzovania kontaktov medzi podnikateľmi každej zmluvnej strany, s cieľom identifikácie komodít vhodných na predaj na trhu druhej zmluvnej strany,- uľahčenie spolupráce medzi colnými službami, najmä vzhľadom na ich odborné vzdelanie, zjednodušenie postupov a zisťovanie porušovania colných nariadení,- podporu a poskytnutie podpory pre obchodné propagačné aktivity, ako sú semináre, sympózia, veľtrhy a obchodné a priemyselné výstavy, obchodné návštevy, recipročné návštevy a podnikateľské týždne,- poskytnutie podpory pre vlastné organizácie a firmy, aby sa im umožnilo zapojenie sa do činností, ktoré sú v prospech oboch strán.2. Ak sa príslušné orgány oboch zmluvných strán tak rozhodnú, spoločenstvo môže pre niektoré obchodné propagačné aktivity uvedené v tomto článku poskytnúť financovanie vrátane prieskumu trhu pre tovary, ktoré sú v záujme Mexika.Dočasné dovážanie tovarovČlánok 18Zmluvné strany sa zaväzujú, že zvážia daňové a colné oslobodenie na dočasný dovoz tovarov na ich územie, ktoré sú zahrnuté pod príslušné medzinárodné dohody týkajúce sa tejto veci.KAPITOLA IIISpolupráca v oblasti vedy a technológieČlánok 19V súlade s ich vzájomným záujmom a cieľmi ich politík v oblasti vedy sa zmluvné strany zaväzujú, že podporia spoluprácu v oblasti vedy a technológie zameranú najmä na podporu výmeny vedcov medzi Mexikom a členskými štátmi spoločenstva v záujme nadviazania trvalých väzieb medzi týmito dvomi vedeckými spoločnosťami, pričom sa zvýši výskumná kapacita, stimuluje technologická inovácia, podporí transfer technológií a spojenie medzi výskumnými strediskami.Článok 20Na podporu spolupráce vo vede a technologickom know-how sa zmluvné strany dohodli, že spoločne vyberú oblasti, o ktoré sa obe strany zaujímajú a osobitnú pozornosť budú venovať nasledovným otázkam: zlepšenie kvality života obyvateľstva, životné prostredie a ochrana prírodných zdrojov, uplatňovanie biotechnológií v medicíne a poľnohospodárstve a nových materiáloch.Článok 21S cieľom dosiahnuť stanovené ciele zmluvné strany budú podporovať a stimulovať činnosti zahŕňajúce: odborné: vzdelávanie a školenie vysoko kvalifikovaného personálu, spoločné výskumné projekty a výmenu vedeckých informácií prostredníctvom seminárov, pracovných workshopov, kongresov a pracovných stretnutí medzi vedeckými sférami oboch zmluvných strán. Takéto činnosti možno vykonávať medzi inštitúciami, orgánmi a podnikmi vo verejnom v súkromnom sektore.Článok 22Spolupráca na projektoch HIGH – TECH bude, okrem iného, špecifikovať formu a prostriedky každej operácie, jej ciele, vedecký a technologický obsah a opatrenia týkajúce sa mobility technického personálu a účasti zástupcov oboch zmluvných strán.Zmluvné strany sa zaväzujú, že stanovia vhodné postupy na zabezpečenie najširšej možnej účasti vedcov a výskumných stredísk na vzájomnej spolupráci.KAPITOLA IVOSTATNÉ OBLASTI SPOLUPRÁCEPoľnohospodárstvo a sektor vidiekaČlánok 23Zmluvné strany zriadia spoluprácu v oblastiach poľnohospodárstva, lesníctva a agropriemyslu.1. Za týmto účelom, v duchu spolupráce a dobrej vôle a s prihliadnutím na zákony oboch zmluvných strán, týkajúcich sa tejto problematiky, zmluvné strany preskúmajú:a) príležitosti rozvoja obchodu s poľnohospodárskymi, lesníckymi a agropriemyselnými výrobkami;b) opatrenia týkajúce sa zdravia, ochrany rastlín a životného prostredia a ich následky, pričom zabezpečia, aby tieto následky nebrzdili obchod.2. Zmluvné strany sa ďalej vynasnažia podporovať spoluprácu v oblastiach:a) rozvoja mexického poľnohospodárstva vo všeobecnosti;b) ochrany a rozvoja lesných zdrojov, najmä vo vzťahu k tropickým lesom;c) poľnohospodárskeho a vidieckeho životného prostredia;d) vzdelania a školenia v oblasti vedeckých poľnohospodárskych technológiách;e) poľnohospodárskeho výskumu;f) kontaktov medzi poľnohospodárskymi výrobcami zmluvných strán v záujme uľahčenia obchodných operácií a investícií;g) poľnohospodárskych štatistík.RybolovČlánok 24Zmluvné strany si uvedomujú význam nadviazania priateľských vzťahov v rybolove a dôsledkom toho sa budú prostredníctvom formulácie a realizácie špecifických programov, ktoré sa budú zaoberať hospodárskymi, obchodnými, vedeckými a technickými stránkami tejto oblasti, usilovať o ich posilnenie a rozvoj. Tiež podporia spoločnú účasť súkromných sektorov spoločenstva a Mexika do rozvoja rybolovu.Prezentácia špecifických programov týkajúcich sa spolupráce v zmysle tejto dohody nevylúči možnosť dohodnutia iného mechanizmu vzťahujúceho sa na rybolov.Banícky priemyselČlánok 25Zmluvné strany sa dohodli na propagácii spolupráce v oblasti baníckeho priemyslu, hlavne prostredníctvom operácií zameraných na:- propagáciu účasti podnikov členských štátov spoločenstva do prieskumu, ťažby a výnosného využívania nerastov v Mexiku, v súlade s jeho zákonmi,- podniknutie činností na podporu malých a stredných baníckych podnikov,- vykonávanie výmeny skúseností a technológie týkajúcich sa ťažobného prieskumu a ťažby a vykonávanie spoločného výskumu na využívanie príležitostí technologického rozvoja.Informačné technológie a telekomunikácieČlánok 26Zmluvné strany si uvedomujú, že informačné technológie a telekomunikácie vytvárajú kľúčový prvok modernej spoločnosti a že sú nevyhnutné pre jej hospodársky a sociálny rozvoj.Prehlasujú, že sú pripravené podporovať spoluprácu v oblastiach spoločného záujmu, hlavne vzhľadom na:- štandardizáciu, testovanie a certifikáciu týkajúcu sa informačných technológií a telekomunikácií,- pozemné a satelitné telekomunikácie, ako sú prenosné siete, satelity, optické káble, ISDN, prenos dát a údajov, telefónne systémy pre oblasti vidieka a systémy mobilných telefónov,- elektroniku a mikroelektroniku,- informácie a automatizáciu,- televíznu sústavu s vysokým rozlíšením obrazu,- výskum a rozvoj nových informačných technológií a telekomunikácií.Takáto spolupráca sa realizuje najmä prostredníctvom:- spolupráce odborníkov,- odborných služieb, štúdií a výmeny informácií,- vzdelávania a školenia vedcov a technikov,- formulácií a zavádzaní projektov vzájomného prospechu,- podpory investícií a spoločných investícií,- podpory spoločných projektov týkajúcich sa výskumu a rozvoja, zakladanie informačných sietí a databánk prepájajúcich univerzity, výskumné strediská, testovacie laboratória, podniky a prevádzkovateľov vo verejnom a súkromnom sektore v spoločenstve a Mexiku.Zmluvné strany sa dohodli, že upevnia rozvoj spolupráce vo výskume a vývoji vesmíru, mexickej novej generácii satelitov a experimentálnych nízko orbitných satelitov.Zmluvné strany zavedú osobitné mechanizmy pre spoluprácu v tejto oblasti.Propagácia investícií bude predmetom špeciálneho úsilia zahrňujúce informácie a konzultácie.DopravaČlánok 271. Uznávajúc význam dopravy pre hospodársky rozvoj a intenzifikáciu obchodu, zmluvné strany príjmu potrebné opatrenia na ďalšiu spoluprácu v tejto oblasti.2. Spolupráca v oblasti leteckej, pozemnej a železničnej dopravy a infraštruktúry sa zameria na:a) vzájomnú výmenu informácií v oblasti politík a predmetov spoločného záujmu zmluvných strán;b) hospodárske, právne a technické vzdelávacie odborné programy zamerané na hospodárskych účastníkov trhu a tých, ktorí sú zodpovední za rezorty verejného sektoru;c) technickú pomoc, najmä v spojení s programami na modernizáciu infraštruktúry, nahradenie vozového parku, vozidiel a lietadiel a na zavedenie technológie týkajúcej sa kombinovanej a polyfunkčnej dopravy.ZdravotníctvoČlánok 28Zmluvné strany sa dohodli na spolupráci v oblasti zdravotníctva s cieľom zvýšiť životnú úroveň a kvalitu života, najmä v najviac znevýhodnených sektoroch. V záujme dosiahnutia týchto cieľov sa zmluvné strany zaväzujú, že budú vykonávať spoločný výskum, transfery technológií a vzájomnú výmenu skúseností a technickej pomoci, najmä vrátane opatrení týkajúcich sa:- riadenia a správy rezortov nesúcich zodpovednosť v tejto oblasti,- organizáciu vedeckých stretnutí a výmenu odborníkov,- organizácie programov odborného vzdelania,- programy a projekty na zlepšenie zdravia a sociálneho blahobytu v mestských a vidieckych oblastiach.Kontrola zneužívania drogČlánok 291. Zmluvné strany sa zaväzujú, že, v súlade s ich príslušným právnymi opatreniami, budú koordinovať a upevňovať snahu o zabránenie a zníženie výroby, nezákonného obchodu a užívania drog.2. Takáto spolupráca zahrnie:- projekty školenia, vzdelávania, propagácie zdravia a rehabilitácie drogovo závislých, vrátane projektov na ich opätovné začlenenie do pracovného a sociálneho prostredia,- výskumné programy a projekty,- opatrenia na podporu alternatívnych hospodárskych príležitostí,- výmenu všetkých príslušných informácií vrátane informácií týkajúcich sa prania špinavých peňazí.3. K financovaniu uvedených operácií môžu prispieť verejné a súkromné inštitúcie a národné, regionálne a medzinárodné organizácie po porade s mexickou vládou a príslušnými orgánmi spoločenstva a jeho členských štátov.Energetický priemyselČlánok 30Zmluvné strany si uvedomujú význam energetického rezortu pre hospodársky a sociálny rozvoj a sú pripravené upevniť spoluprácu týkajúcu sa hospodárenia s a efektívneho využívania energií. Táto spolupráca zahrnie hodnotenie využiteľného energetického potenciálu alternatívnych zdrojov energie a uplatňovanie technológií šetrenia energií u priemyselných procesov.Za týmto účelom sa zmluvné strany dohodli, že budú podporovať:- vykonávanie spoločných štúdií a výskumov,- kontakty medzi osobami zodpovednými za energetické plánovanie,- vykonávanie spoločných programov a projektov v tejto oblasti.Životné prostredieČlánok 311. Zmluvné strany sa zaväzujú, nadviazať spoluprácu týkajúcu sa ochrany a zlepšenia životného prostredia týkajúcej sa produktívnej ochrany lesnej a vodnej flóry a fauny, vzhľadom na problémy spôsobené znečistením vody, pôdy a ovzdušia, eróziou, rozširovania púští, odlesňovania, nadmernej ťažby prírodného bohatstva a urbanizácie.2. S týmito cieľmi sa zmluvné strany vynasnažia spolupracovať na environmentálnych opatreniach, ktoré sa usilujú hlavne o:a) založenie a posilnenie verejných a súkromných environmentálnych štruktúr;b) zavedenie zákonov, noriem a modelov;c) vykonanie výskumných, vzdelávacích, informačných opatrení a opatrení pre verejné povedomie;d) spracovávanie štúdií a projektov a dodávanie technickej pomoci;e) organizáciu stretnutí, seminárov, pracovných dielní, konferencií a návštev štátnych zamestnancov, odborníkov, technikov, podnikateľov a ostatných osôb aktívnych v životnom prostredí;f) vzájomnú výmenu informácií a skúseností v hlavných environmentálnych otázkach globálneho významu;g) spracovávanie spoločných programov a projektov štúdií a výskumu týkajúcich sa živelných pohrôm a prevencií týchto pohrôm.3. Zmluvné strany sa dohodli, že budú spolupracovať vo všetkých otázkach a problémoch týkajúcich sa vody vrátane meteorológie a klimatológie a vo výskume a vývoji technológií, riadení, používaní a ochrane vodných zdrojov.Cestovný ruchČlánok 32Zmluvné strany, v súlade so svojimi vnútroštátnymi právnymi predpismi, podporia spoluprácu v oblasti cestovnom ruchu, ktorú dosiahnu prostredníctvom osobitných opatrení zahŕňajúcich:- výmenu úradníkov a odborníkov pracujúcich v cestovnom ruchu, výmenu informácií a štatistík týkajúcich sa tejto oblasti a transferu technológie,- rozvoj činností na stimulovanie cestovného ruchu,- podporu vzdelávacích systémov určených najmä na podporu prevádzky a riadenia hotelov,- spoločnú účasť na veľtrhoch a výstavách zameraných na rast tokov cestovného ruchu.Sociálne záležitosti a rozvoj plánovaniaČlánok 331. Spoločenstvo súhlasí s tým, že bude podporovať opatrenia pre rozvoj spolupráce v sociálnom a hospodárskom plánovaní, hlavne so zreteľom na výmenu informácií a know-how týkajúcich sa metód, prípravy a realizácie špeciálnych programov v tejto oblasti. Takáto spolupráca sa predovšetkým dosiahne prostredníctvom:a) výmeny informácií;b) recipročných návštev a výmen odborníkov;c) organizácií seminárov, sympózií a konferencií;d) zabezpečenia technickej pomoci pre správu sociálnych služieb;e) činností zo strany mimovládnych organizácií na doplnenie úradnej činnosti v tejto oblasti.2. Zmluvné strany sa dohodli, že podrobne prerokujú programy a projekty týkajúce sa sociálneho rozvoja a zamerané na splnenie základných potrieb najviac zanedbaných častí obyvateľstva. Takáto spolupráca zahrnie najmä opatrenia na boj proti extrémnej chudobe a na vytvorenie nových zdrojov zamestnanosti.VládaČlánok 34Zmluvné strany budú spolupracovať v záležitostiach týkajúcich sa vlády a inštitúcií na národnej, regionálnej a miestnej úrovni.Za týmto účelom sa zmluvné strany sa zaväzujú, že budú:- podporovať stretnutia, návštevy, výmeny informácií a technického personálu, semináre a vzdelávacie kurzy pre štátnych zamestnancov a personál rezortov národnej, štátnej a miestnej správy,- vymieňať informácie o programoch zameraných na zlepšenie účinnosti takýchto úsekov štátnej služby.Informácie, komunikácia a kultúraČlánok 35Zmluvné strany sa spoločne zaväzujú, že v oblastiach informácií a komunikácií budú konať spoločne, aby podporili kultúrne väzby, ktoré medzi nimi už existujú.Tieto opatrenia nadobudnú podobu najmä:- vzájomnej výmeny informácií v otázkach spoločného záujmu týkajúceho sa kultúry a informácií,- prípravných štúdií a technickej pomoci na zachovanie kultúrneho dedičstva,- organizácie kultúrnych podujatí,- kultúrnych výmen,- akademických výmen,- prekladu literárnych diel.VzdelanieČlánok 36Zmluvné strany v oblastiach spoločného záujmu zriadia osobitné odborné vzdelávacie programy. Spolupráca v odbornom vzdelávaní a školení zohľadní príspevky nových technológií v danej oblasti.Zmluvné strany sa dohodli, že príjmu potrebné kroky na podporu vzdelávania a školenia technického a výkonného personálu, pričom prioritu budú klásť na opatrenia, ktoré majú značný viacnásobný účinok zameraný na školiaci a technický personál, ktorý sa už nachádza na zodpovedných pozíciách v podnikoch verejného a súkromného sektoru, vládnych rezortoch, verejnoprospešných a hospodárskych organizáciách. Takáto spolupráca sa uskutoční prostredníctvom osobitných programov na výmenu odborníkov, know-how a techník medzi mexickými a európskymi vzdelávacími inštitúciami, najmä v technickej, vedeckej a technologickej oblasti.Regionálna spoluprácaČlánok 37Zmluvné strany podporia opatrenia zamerané na upevnenie spolupráce s inými krajinami v rámci dohôd, na ktorých sa zúčastňujú ako zmluvné strany. Osobitnú prioritu získajú opatrenia, ktorými sa usilujú o dosiahnutie:- rozvoja obchodu v rámci regiónu;- podporu spolupráce v oblasti životného prostredia na regionálnej úrovni,- posilnenie regionálnych inštitúcií a pomoci pri realizácii spoločných politík a činností,- podporu rozvoja regionálnych komunikácií.Zdroje na realizáciu spolupráceČlánok 38Na uľahčenie dosiahnutia cieľov spolupráce ustanovených v tejto dohode použijú zmluvné strany vhodné finančné a iné zdroje v súlade s ich možnosťami a príslušnými mechanizmami.KAPITOLA VSpoločný výborČlánok 391. Zmluvné strany zriadia v zmysle tejto dohody Spoločný výbor, ktorý sa bude na jednej strane skladať zo zástupcov spoločenstva a na druhej strane zo zástupcov Mexika.2. Spoločný výbor:a) dohliada na náležité fungovanie tejto dohody;b) dáva súhlas a koordinuje činnosti, projekty a vedecké operácie týkajúce sa cieľov tejto dohody a navrhuje prostriedky ich zavedenia;c) analyzuje vývoj obchodu a spolupráce medzi zmluvnými stranami;d) poskytuje odporúčania potrebné na podporu rozšírenia obchodu, posilnenia a diverzifikácii spolupráce;e) hľadá vhodné metódy pri predchádzaní problémom, ktoré by mohli vzniknúť v oblastiach zahrnutých v tejto dohode;f) podporuje a sleduje činnosti Obchodnej Rady a ostatných orgánov, ktoré môžu prispieť k rozšíreniu vzťahov medzi zmluvnými stranami.3. Spoločný výbor môže založiť špecializované podvýbory a pracovné tímy, aby mu pomáhali pri plnení jeho povinností. Na každom z ich stretnutí tieto podvýbory a pracovné tímy vypracovávajú pre Spoločný výbor podrobné správy o svojej činnosti.4. Spoločný výbor zasadá minimálne raz za rok, striedavo v Mexiko City a Bruseli. Špeciálne zasadnutie možno zvolať na základe vzájomnej dohody na požiadanie ktorejkoľvek zo zmluvných strán. Vo funkcii predsedu Spoločného výboru sa zmluvné strany budú striedať.5. Program zasadnutí Spoločného výboru určia zmluvné strany dohodou.KAPITOLA VIZÁVEREČNÉ USTANOVENIAOstatné opatreniaČlánok 401. Bez toho, aby boli dotknuté ustanovenia Zmluvy o založení Európskeho spoločenstva, táto dohoda, ani žiadna iná činnosť podniknutá v jej zmysle, nijako neovplyvnia právomoci členských štátov spoločenstiev na podniknutie obojstranných činností s Mexikom v oblasti hospodárskej spolupráce alebo, ak je to vhodné, na uzatvorenie nových dohôd o hospodárskej spolupráci s Mexikom.2. Bez toho, aby boli dotknuté ustanovenia odseku 1 týkajúce sa hospodárskej spolupráce, ustanovenia tejto dohody nahrádzajú ustanovenia dohôd uzatvorených medzi členskými štátmi spoločenstiev a Mexikom, ak sú tieto ustanovenia buď nezlučiteľné s alebo rovnaké s ustanoveniami tejto dohody.Územné uplatňovanieČlánok 41Táto dohoda sa bude uplatňovať na jednej strane na územia, na ktorých sa uplatňuje Zmluva o založení Európskeho spoločenstva a za podmienok v nej ustanovených, a na strane druhej strane na územie Mexika.PrílohyČlánok 42Prílohy tvoria neoddeliteľnú súčasť tejto dohody.Nadobudnutie platnosti a tiché obnovenieČlánok 43Táto dohoda nadobúda platnosť v prvý deň mesiaca nasledujúceho po dni, v ktorý si zmluvné strany oznámili ukončenie právnych postupov potrebných na tento účel; uzatvára sa na obdobie piatich rokov. Obnovuje sa ročne tichým obnovením, pokiaľ jedna zo zmluvných strán od nej neodstúpi šesť mesiacov pred uplynutím jej platnosti.Platné zneniaČlánok 44Táto dohoda je vyhotovená v dvoch origináloch v anglickom, dánskom, francúzskom, holandskom, nemeckom, portugalskom, španielskom a talianskom jazyku z ktorých každé znenie je rovnako autentické.Budúce vývojeČlánok 451. Zmluvné strany môžu túto dohodu, za spoločného súhlasu, rozšíriť vzhľadom na zvýšenie úrovní spolupráce a ich doplnenia prostredníctvom dohôd o konkrétnych sektoroch alebo činnostiach.2. Vzhľadom na vykonávanie tejto dohody, ktorákoľvek zo zmluvných strán môže predložiť návrhy na rozšírenie rozsahu spolupráce, pričom zohľadní skúsenosti získané pri jej uplatňovaní.En fe de lo cual, los plenipotenciarios abajo firmantes suscriben el presente Acuerdo marco.Til bekræftelse heraf har undertegnede befuldmægtigede underskrevet denne rammeaftale.Zu Urkund dessen haben die unterzeichneten Bevollmächtigten ihre Unterschriften unter dieses Rahmenabkommen gesetzt.Είς πίστωση των ανωτέρω, οι υπογεγραμμένοι πληρεξούσιοι έθεσαν τις υπογραφές τους στην παρούσα συμφωνίαπλαίσιο.In witness whereof the undersigned Plenipotentiaries have signed this Framework Agreement.En foi de quoi, les plénipotentiaires soussignés ont apposé leurs signatures au bas du présent accord-cadre.In fede di che, i plenipotenziari sottoscritti hanno apposto le loro firme in calce al presente accordo quadro.Ten blijke waarvan de ondergetekende gevolmachtigden hun handtekening onder deze Kaderovereenkomst hebben gesteld.Em fé do que, os plenipotenciarios abaixo assinados apuseram as suas assinaturas no final do presente acordo-quadro.Hecho en Luxemburgo, el veintiseis de abril de mil novecientos noventa y uno.Udfærdiget i Luxembourg, den seksogtyvende april nitten hundrede og enoghalvfems.Geschehen zu Luxemburg am sechsundzwanzigsten April neunzehnhunderteinundneunzig.Έγινε στο Λουξεμβούργο, στις είκοσι έξι Απριλίου χίλια εννιακόσια ενενήντα ένα.Done at Luxembourg on the twenty-sixth day of April in the year one thousand nine hundred and ninety-one.Fait à Luxembourg, le vingt-six avril mil neuf cent quatre-vingt-onze.Fatto a Lussemburgo, addì ventisei aprile millenovecentonovantuno.Gedaan te Luxemburg, de zesentwintigste april negentienhonderd een-en-negentig.Feito no Luxemburgo, em vinte e seis de Abril de mil novecentos e noventa e um.Por el Consejo de las Comunidades EuropeasFor Rådet for De Europæiske FællesskaberFür den Rat der Europäischen GemeinschaftenΓια το Συμβούλιο των Ευρωπαϊκών ΚοινοτήτωνFor the Council of the European CommunitiesPour le Conseil des Communautés européennesPer il Consiglio delle Comunità europeeVoor de Raad van de Europese GemeenschappenPelo Conselho das Comunidades Europeias+++++ TIFF +++++Por el Gobierno de los Estados Unidos MexicanosFor regeringen for De Forenede Mexicanske StaterFür die Regierung der Vereinigten Mexikanischen StaatenΓια την Κυβέρνηση των Ηνωμένων Πολιτειών του ΜεξικούFor the Government of the United Mexican StatesPour le Gouvernement des États-Unis mexicainsPer il governo degli Stati Uniti del MessicoVoor de Regering van de Verenigde Mexicaanse StatenPelo Governo dos Estados Unidos Mexicanos+++++ TIFF +++++--------------------------------------------------PRÍLOHA IJEDNOSTRANNÁ DEKLARÁCIA SPOLOČENSTVA VZHĽADOM NA OPATRENIA PASÍVNEHO ZOŠĽACHŤOVACIEHO STYKUPri zohľadnení správcov a potenciálnych užívateľov v Mexiku, spoločenstvo príjme kroky na poskytovanie informácií, ako čo najviac využívať príležitosti ponúkané pravidlami spoločenstva týkajúcich sa pasívneho zošľachťovacieho styku, ktoré sa vychádzajú z vývozu tovarov zo spoločenstva s cieľom ich následného spätného dovozu do spoločenstva z Mexika po ich spracovaní, opracovaní alebo oprave.--------------------------------------------------PRÍLOHA IIDEKLARÁCIA SPOLOČENSTVA VZHĽADOM NA ZSPEurópske hospodárske spoločenstvo týmto potvrdzuje význam Zovšeobecneného systému preferencií – zavedeného spoločenstvom v súlade s rezolúciou č. 21 časťou II Druhej konferencie Organizácie spojených národov o obchode a rozvoji – pre rozvoj obchodu krajín.S cieľom umožniť Mexiku, aby čo najlepšie a najplnšie využívalo systém preferencií Európskeho hospodárskeho spoločenstva, spoločenstvo týmto prehlasuje svoju ochotu preskúmať návrhy Mexika na identifikáciu spôsobov umožnenia tejto krajine čerpať maximálne výhody z možností ponúkaných týmto systémom.Spoločenstvo bude poriadať vzdelávacie semináre týkajúce sa používania Zovšeobecneného systému preferencií pre správcov a užívateľov v Mexiku s cieľom umožniť im čerpať čo najväčšie výhody z tohto systému.--------------------------------------------------PRÍLOHA IIIVýmena Listov o Námornej DopraveList č. 1Vážený pane,boli by sme Vám zaviazaný, keby ste nám mohli potvrdiť, že Vaša vláda súhlasí s nasledovným znením:Pri podpisovaní Dohody o spolupráci medzi Európskym hospodárskym spoločenstvom a Mexikom sa zmluvné strany zaviazali, že budú vhodným spôsobom riešiť otázky týkajúce sa prevádzky námornej dopravy, najmä tam, kde táto problematika môže brzdiť rozvoj obchodu. Vzhľadom na námornú dopravu sa vzájomne uspokojujúce riešenia budú hľadať s dodržiavaním zásady voľnej a spravodlivej obchodnej konkurencie.Tiež sa dohodli, že tieto otázky prerokuje tiež Spoločný výbor.Prijmite, prosím, výraz mojej najhlbšej úcty.V mene Rady Európskych spoločenstievList č. 2Vážený pane,mám česť potvrdiť príjem Vášho listu a potvrdiť, že moja vláda súhlasí s nasledovným znením:"Pri podpisovaní Dohody o spolupráci medzi Európskym hospodárskym spoločenstvom a Mexikom sa zmluvné strany zaviazali, že budú vhodným spôsobom riešiť otázky týkajúce sa prevádzky námornej dopravy, najmä tam, kde táto problematika môže brzdiť rozvoj obchodu. Vzhľadom na námornú dopravu sa vzájomne uspokojujúce riešenia budú hľadať s dodržiavaním zásady voľnej a spravodlivej obchodnej konkurencie.Tiež sa dohodli, že tieto otázky prerokuje tiež Spoločný výbor."Prijmite, prosím, výraz mojej najhlbšej úcty.Za vládu Spojených štátov mexických--------------------------------------------------


type: legislation

text:
26 . 10 . 71 Amtsblatt der Europäischen Gemeinschaften Nr. L 240/ 13
 M
 (Nicht veröffentlichungsbedürftige Rechtsakte)
 RAT
 BESCHLUSS DES RATES
 vom 27. September 1971
 über den Abschluß eines Abkommens zwischen der Europäischen Wirtschaftsgemein
 schaft und dem Internationalen Komitee vom Roten Kreuz zur Verlängerung der Frist
 für die Durchführung des Abkommens zwischen der Europäischen Wirtschaftsge
 meinschaft und dem Internationalen Komitee vom Roten Kreuz über die Lieferung von
 Magermilchpulver im Rahmen der Nahrungsmittelhilfe
 (71 /350/EWG)
 DER RAT DER EUROPAISCHEN BESCHLIESST :
 GEMEINSCHAFTEN —
 Artikel 1
 gestützt auf den Vertrag zur Gründung der Europä Im Namen der Europäischen Wirtschaftsgemeinschaft
 ischen Wirtschaftsgemeinschaft, insbesondere auf die wird in Form eines Briefwechsels mit dem Internatio
 Artikel 113 , 114 und 228 , nalen Komitee vom Roten Kreuz ein Abkommen zur
 Verlängerung der Frist für die Durchführung des
 auf Empfehlung der Kommission, Abkommens über die Lieferung von Magermilchpul
 ver im Rahmen der Nahrungsmittelhilfe geschlossen .
 Der Wortlaut des genannten Abkommens wird
 in Erwägung nachstehender Gründe : diesem Beschluß als Anhang beigefügt.
 In dem Abkommen zwischen der Europäischen Artikel 2
 Wirtschaftsgemeinschaft und dem Internationalen
 Der Präsident des Rates wird ermächtigt, die Person
 Komitee vom Roten Kreuz über die Lieferung von
 Magermilchpulver im Rahmen der Nahrungsmittel
 zu bestellen, die zur Unterzeichnung des Abkom
 mens befugt ist, und ihr die Vollmachten zu
 hilfe ( 1 ) ist vorgesehen, daß die Lieferungen bis zum
 übertragen, die erforderlich sind, um für die
 31 . Dezember 1970 abgeschlossen sein müssen, wobei Gemeinschaft verbindlich zu handeln .
 eine zusätzliche Frist von beiden Vertragsparteien
 vereinbart werden kann .
 Geschehen zu Brüssel am 27. September 1971 .
 Das Komitee vom Roten Kreuz hat die Europäische Im Namen des Rates
 Wirtschaftsgemeinschaft um die Verlängerung der im Der Präsident
 Abkommen genannten Durchführungsfrist ersucht ;
 diesem Ersuchen ist stattzugeben — L. NATALI
 (!) ABl . Nr. L 107 vom 19 . 5 . 1970 , S. 15 .
 ---pagebreak--- Nr. L 240/ 14 Amtsblatt der Europäischen Gemeinschaften 26. 10. 71
 BRIEFWECHSEL
 A. Schreiben der Europäischen Wirtschaftsgemeinschaft :
 Mit Bezug auf das am 25 . März 1970 unterzeichnete Abkommen zwischen der Europä
 ischen Wirtschaftsgemeinschaft und dem Internationalen Komitee vom Roten Kreuz über
 die Lieferung von Magermilchpulver im Rahmen der Nahrungsmittelhilfe und auf Grund
 des Ersuchens Ihres Komitees um Verlängerung der Durchführungsfrist des Abkommens
 beehre ich mich, Ihnen vorzuschlagen, den in Artikel II des Abkommens genannten 31 . De
 zember 1970 durch den 30. Juni 1972 zu ersetzen. Die beiden Vertragsparteien können
 im Bedarfsfall eine zusätzliche Frist unter den in Artikel IX des vorgenannten Abkommens
 festgesetzten Bedingungen vorsehen .
 Ich bitte Sie, mir mitzuteilen , ob Sie hiermit einverstanden sind .
 B. Schreiben des Internationalen Komitees vom Roten Kreuz :
 Ich beehre mich, Ihnen den Empfang des Schreibens vom mit folgendem
 Wortlaut anzuzeigen :
 „Mit Bezug auf hiermit einverstanden sind."
 Ich gestatte mir, Ihnen mitzuteilen, daß das Internationale Komitee vom Roten Kreuz mit
 Ihrem Vorschlag einverstanden ist.
 Mitteilung betreffend die Unterzeichnung des Abkommens — in Form eines Briefwechsels
 — zwischen der Europäischen Wirtschaftsgemeinschaft und dem Internationalen
 Komitee vom Roten Kreuz
 Das Abkommen — in Form eines Briefwechsels — zwischen der Europäischen
 Wirtschaftsgemeinschaft und dem Internationalen Komitee vom Roten Kreuz zur
 Verlängerung der Durchführungsfrist des am 25 . März 1970 ( J ) zwischen diesen
 Parteien geschlossenen Abkommens über die Lieferung von Magermilchpulver im
 Rahmen der Nahrungsmittelhilfe, dessen Abschluß der Rat am 27. September 1971
 beschlossen hat, ist am 28 . September 1971 im Namen des Rates der Europäischen
 Gemeinschaften vom Generaldirektor für Entwicklungshilfe der Kommission der
 Europäischen Gemeinschaften, Herrn Hans-Broder Krohn, und im Namen des
 Internationalen Komitees vom Roten Kreuz vom Sonderberater des Präsidenten, Herrn
 Raymond Courvoisier, in Brüssel unterzeichnet worden .
 (») ABl . Nr. L 107 vom 19 . 5 . 1970 .


text:
 115 SRES 625 ATS: Designating the week beginning September 9, 2018, as “National Direct Support Professionals Recognition Week”.
 U.S. Senate
 2018-09-12
 text/xml
 EN
 Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.
 III115th CONGRESS2d SessionS. RES. 625IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATESSeptember 12, 2018Mr. Cardin (for himself, Ms. Collins, Mr. King, Mr. Brown, Mr. Markey, Mr. Murphy, Mr. Menendez, Ms. Warren, Ms. Klobuchar, Mr. Blumenthal, Ms. Hassan, Mr. Jones, Mr. Van Hollen, Mr. Casey, Ms. Baldwin, and Mr. Donnelly) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the JudiciarySeptember 26, 2018Committee discharged; considered and agreed toRESOLUTIONDesignating the week beginning September 9, 2018, as National Direct Support Professionals Recognition Week.
 Whereas direct support professionals, including direct care workers, personal assistants, personal attendants, in-home support workers, and paraprofessionals, are key to providing publicly funded, long-term support and services for millions of individuals with disabilities;
 Whereas direct support professionals provide essential support that ensures that individuals with disabilities are—
 (1)included as a valued part of the community of the individual; (2)supported at home, at work, and in the communities of the United States; and
 (3)empowered to live with the dignity that all people of the United States deserve; Whereas all communities have a stake in ensuring that individuals with disabilities thrive through the connections of the individuals to their families, friends, and communities, fostered by the direct support professionals of those individuals, so as to avoid more costly institutional care;
 Whereas direct support professionals support individuals with disabilities by helping those individuals make person-centered choices that lead to meaningful, productive lives;
 Whereas direct support professionals must build close, respectful, and trusting relationships with individuals with disabilities;
 Whereas direct support professionals provide a broad range of individualized support to individuals with disabilities, including—
 (1)assisting with the preparation of meals; (2)helping with medication;
 (3)assisting with bathing, dressing, and other aspects of daily living; (4)assisting with access to the environment of the individuals;
 (5)providing transportation to school, work, religious, and recreational activities; and (6)helping with general daily affairs, such as assisting with financial matters, medical appointments, and personal interests;
 Whereas there is a documented critical and increasing shortage of direct support professionals throughout the United States;
 Whereas direct support professionals are a critical element in supporting— (1)individuals who are receiving health care services for severe chronic health conditions and individuals with functional limitations; and
 (2)the successful transition of individuals from medical events to post-acute care and long-term support and services;
 Whereas many direct support professionals are the primary financial providers for their families; Whereas direct support professionals are hardworking, taxpaying citizens who provide an important service to people with disabilities in the United States, yet many continue to earn low wages, receive inadequate benefits, and have limited opportunities for advancement, resulting in high turnover and vacancy rates that adversely affect the quality of support, safety, and health of individuals with disabilities;
 Whereas the Supreme Court of the United States, in Olmstead v. L.C. by Zimring, 527 U.S. 581 (June 22, 1999)—
 (1)recognized the importance of the deinstitutionalization of, and community-based services for, individuals with disabilities; and
 (2)held that, under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S. 12101 et seq.), a State must provide community-based services to persons with intellectual and developmental disabilities if—
 (A)the community-based services are appropriate; (B)the affected person does not oppose receiving the community-based services; and
 (C)the community-based services can be reasonably accommodated after the community has taken into account the resources available to the State and the needs of other individuals with disabilities in the State; and
 Whereas, in 2018, the majority of direct support professionals are employed in home- and community-based settings and that trend will increase over the next decade: Now, therefore, be it
 That the Senate— (1)designates the week beginning September 9, 2018, as National Direct Support Professionals Recognition Week;
 (2)recognizes the dedication and vital role of direct support professionals in enhancing the lives of individuals with disabilities of all ages;
 (3)appreciates the contribution of direct support professionals in supporting individuals with disabilities and their families in the United States;
 (4)commends direct support professionals for being integral to the provision of long-term support and services for individuals with disabilities;
 (5)encourages the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the Department of Labor to collect data specific to direct support professionals; and
 (6)finds that the successful implementation of the public policies affecting individuals with disabilities in the United States depends on the dedication of direct support professionals.


type: wikipedia

text:
A Zsaru vagy csirkefogó? (eredeti cím: Flic ou voyou) 1979-ben bemutatott francia bűnügyi filmvígjáték. Ez volt Jean-Paul Belmondo első közös filmje Georges Lautner rendezővel. A produkcióban inkább a vígjátéki, semmint a bűnügyi elemek dominálnak. A Zsaru vagy csirkefogó? kiugró sikert ért el Franciaországban, csak Párizsban több mint egymillió néző látta. Ennek köszönhetően a következő években a Belmondo–Lautner páros elkészítette a Szabadlábon Velencében (1980), A profi (1981) és a Kellemes húsvéti ünnepeket! (1984) című filmeket.
 A cselekmény
 A helyszín a csodaszép Nizza. Bertrand felügyelőt és alkalmi barátnőjét meggyilkolják egy lakásban. A tettesek a felügyelőt egy autóba ültetik, újra lelövik, a kocsit pedig egy szakadékba lökik. A meggyilkolt rendőr özvegyét rövidesen felkeresi egy Antonio Cerutti nevű férfi, aki állítása szerint annak a prostituáltnak a testvére, aki mellett a felügyelőt valójában megölték. Madame Bertrand egy jelenlévő barátjára bízza Ceruttit. A rámenős Cerutti – aki a börtönből frissen szabadultnak mondja magát – átlát a szitán, miheztartás végett megjegyzi, hogy sejti, nem a rendőri fizetésből futotta az elhunytnak ilyen luxusra. Kilátásba helyezi, hogy hamarosan visszatér. Az özvegytől egyenesen Cerutti mamához megy. A néző számára ekkor kiderül, hogy a vagány férfi valójában nem az asszony fia. Cerutti mama locsog-fecseg, elmondja például, hogy lányát egy Mario nevű alak szédítette. Langlois úr vendéglőjében az ál-Cerutti a maga módján (néhány pofonnal és ökölcsapással) megpróbálja szóra bírni Mariót, aki viszont keveset tud. Utána maga a vendéglős kerül sorra, akinek a felesége is jelen van. A trió végül bevallja, hogy mi történt valójában: a bűntett helyszínén két nyomozó, Rey és Massard jelentek meg elsőként, ők vitték el a hullát máshová. A két korrupt zsaru Musard úrnak dolgozik, aki a szerencsejáték-üzletet tartja kézben.
 Az ál-Cerutti egy este elrabolja Musard urat, és meztelenül kirakja az utcára egy telefonfülke közelében. Ezzel a trükkel néhány órára kivonja a férfit a forgalomból. Közben elmegy Musard úr kaszinójába, és robbanóanyagot helyez el az irodában. A robbanás nyomán óriási pánik támad. Az ál-Cerutti arra számít, hogy Musard az akcióval a nizzai alvilág másik fejesét, Achille-t gyanúsítja majd. Miután távozik a kaszinóból, útközben segít egy elegáns nőnek, akinek lerobbant a kocsija. A nő házába mennek, ahol rövidesen ágyba kerülnek. Az asszony szintén ott volt a kaszinóban a robbanás idején. Másnap, reggeli közben együtt olvassák az esetről szóló sajtóhíreket. Hamarosan elválnak, hiszen az asszony – Edmonde Puget-Rostand – írónő, dolgoznia kell.
 Az ál-Cerutti visszatér Bertrand özvegyéhez, ahol már jelen van Musard úr riválisa, Achille. A férfi megtagadja, hogy fizessen Ceruttinak. Megjelenik Rey és Massard. Rey leüti Ceruttit. Az alélt férfit pisztollyal a kezében kiteszik az országútra, nem messze Mario hullájától. Cerutti alig tér magához, már ott a rendőrség. Beviszik, s némi ütlegeléssel színezve kihallgatják. Éppen a folyosón viszik a zárkájába, amikor megjelenik egy fiatal lány, aki apjaként kiált utána. Grimaud felügyelő gyorsan az irodájába tessékeli a Charlotte nevű lánykát. Rövidesen sor kerül Cerutti és Charlotte találkozására. A lány Angliában nevelkedett eddig, de eljött az iskolából, a férfi pedig valójában rendőr. Egyébként tényleg apáról és lányáról van szó. Cerutti Edmonde-hoz küldi Charlotte-ot. Mivel Grimaud is rájött arra, hogy őrizetese valójában rendőr, Cerutti titkos szövetséget ajánl neki, hogy rács mögé juttassák Musard-t és Achille-t. Mario meggyilkolásának helyszíni rekonstrukciója közben Cerutti megszökik. Autós hajsza során sikerül leráznia üldözőit. Edmonde-hoz megy, ahol békésen vacsorázgatnak négyesben. (A negyedik személy Edmonde férje.) Charlotte azzal próbálja felhívni magára a figyelmet, hogy azt állítja, állapotos. Cerutti és Edmonde azonban tudják, hogy mindez csak mese, hogy foglalkozzanak kicsit a lánnyal.
 Cerutti még aznap este elmegy Langlois úr vendéglőjébe. Hazaküldi a kuncsaftra váró kurvákat, és benzint locsol szét a helyiségben. Utána úgy tesz, mintha Musard urat hívná, majd a Langlois házaspár szeme láttára felgyújtja a vendéglőt. Achille-nek a házaspár természetesen azt bizonygatja, hogy a gyújtogatás Musard úr parancsára történt. Langlois elejtett megjegyzése azonban gyanút ébreszt Achille-ben. Elküldi nyomozni Reyt és Massard-t, akik Cerutti mamához mennek látogatóba. Az asszony persze elmondja, hogy neki nincs fia. Közben az ál-Cerutti kimegy a repülőtérre. Itt elfogja azt a kábítószer-szállítmányt, ami egy játékmaciban érkezik Musard számára. Utána felhívja őt, s úgy beszél, mintha Achille utasítására cselekedne. Mellesleg kilátásba helyezi, hogy pár perc múlva újra felrobban Musard irodája, ami be is következik. Grimaud felügyelő kávézgatás közben örömmel olvassa a bandaháborúról szóló újsághíreket.
 Massard és Rey már tudják, hogy Cerutti valójában nem az, akinek mondja magát, de még mindig nem tudják, kicsoda valójában. Hamarosan ez is kiderül: Cerutti nem más, mint Borovitz felügyelő Párizsból, a korrupt zsaruk réme. Massard a lebukás elől Velencébe akar menni, hogy ott várja ki a bandaháború végét, Rey azonban végezni akar Borovitz felügyelővel. Egy ízben a nyomába ered, de Borovitz csapdába csalja egy szaunában. Miután Rey megpróbálja megölni, Borovitz bezárja egy szaunafülkébe, és forró gőzt enged rá. Később a hullát liften felküldi Achille lakásába, és kihívja rá a rendőrséget. Achille-t letartóztatják. Massard ráébred arra, hogy egykori megbízója, Achille fölött eljárt az idő. Elmegy Musard-hoz, és szövetséget ajánl neki. Álarcosok egy presszó teraszáról elrabolják Borovitz lányát. Massard felajánlja Borovitznak, hogy visszaszerzi a lányt, amennyiben a felügyelő tisztára mossa őt. Mivel Grimaud felügyelő megtagadja a segítségét, Borovitz magánakcióba kezd. Kiviszi Achille-t a rendőrségről, s a szaunában megpróbálja szóra bírni. Kiderül, hogy Achille tényleg semmit nem tud Charlotte elrablásáról. Jelentkezik azonban Musard, és alkut ajánl Borovitznak. Találkát beszélnek meg, ahol Massard jelenik meg Charlotte-tal. Valójában Massard megölte a lány őrzőit és Musard-t, hogy elnyerje Borovitz bizalmát Charlotte visszajuttatásával. Borovitz úgy tesz, mintha hálás lenne. Átadja kocsija kulcsát Massard-nak, hogy az immár fölöslegessé vált Achille-t ő vigye vissza a rendőrségre. A rendőrségi rádión viszont azt a felhívást teszi közzé, hogy Achille Massard segítségével megszökött. Massard az autóban visszautasítja Achille ajánlatát, hogy szökjenek meg: ő komolyan elhitte, hogy Charlotte visszajuttatásával sikerült elsimítani régebbi zűrös ügyeit. A rendőrök rövidesen megállítják Massard kocsiját, és megkísérlik letartóztatni a férfit. Erre Massard – még mindig Achille-lal az autóban – menekülőre fogja, de karambolozik. A kigyulladt kocsi égve zuhan egy töltésről a közeledő vonat elé. A nizzai alvilágot a rendőrség immár lefejezte. Borovitz és Charlotte búcsút vesznek Edmonde-tól...
 Érdekességek
 A film előzménye, hogy Belmondo és Lautner kölcsönösen kinyilvánította azon óhaját, hogy szeretnének egymással dolgozni. Miután csatlakozott hozzájuk Michel Audiard forgatókönyvíró, elkezdtek megfelelő témát keresni. Szerették volna, ha filmjük tele lenne akciókkal, váratlan fordulatokkal, valóságos figurákkal. Az alapanyagot Michel Grisolia L'Inspecteur de la mer (A tenger felügyelője) című regénye szolgáltatta. Egész pontosan a könyv egyik jelenete, és főleg egyik szereplője tűnt érdekesnek számukra.
 Belmondót örömmel töltötte el, hogy lényegében két szerepet játszik egyszerre. Lautner kívánsága az volt, hogy ezúttal főleg színészi eszköztárát csillogtassa meg, kevesebb kaszkadőrmutatványa legyen.
 A sanzonénekesként is ismert Marie Laforêt további két filmben volt Belmondo partnere: Az arany bűvöletében (1984), Kellemes húsvéti ünnepeket! (1984).
 A szereplők közül többen a magánéletben barátságot ápoltak Belmondóval. A Charles Gérard-ral való barátság azonban csúnyán ért véget. 1980-ban Gérard egy újságinterjúban lényegében azt állította, hogy ő nevelte fel Belmondo három gyerekét, ő járt a szülői értekezletekre, és a gyerekek is hozzá fordultak a problémáikkal, nem az apjukhoz. Belmondo beperelte a lapot és a barát-kollégát: mindkét pert megnyerte. Gérard-ral hosszú időre megszakította a barátságot, de a 2000-es években kibékültek és újra jóbarátok lettek.
 A Belmondo ellenfelét alakító Claude Brosset jó barátja lett Belmondónak és ez a barátság mindvégig kitartott és addig még négy másik filmben dolgoztak együtt. Brosset 2007-ben meghalt.
 Főszereplők
 Jean-Paul Belmondo – Antonio Cerutti / Stanislas Borovitz (Sztankay István)
 Georges Géret – Theodore Musard (Láng József)
 Jean-François Balmer – Massard nyomozó (Mikó István)
 Claude Brosset – Achille Volfoni (Konrád Antal)
 Julie Jézéquel – Charlotte (Jani Ildikó)
 Michel Beaune – Marcel Langlois (Gruber Hugó)
 Tony Kendall – Rey (Csurka László)
 Catherine Lachens – Simone Langlois (Tóth Judit)
 Juliette Mills – Madame Bertrand (Dallos Szilvia)
 Venantino Venantini – Mario (Végvári Tamás)
 Charles Gérard – Cazauban (Bodor Tibor)
 Michel Galabru – Grimaud felügyelő (Fillár István)
 Marie Laforêt – Edmonde Puget-Rostand (Bánsági Ildikó)
 Michel Peyrelon – Camille (Zenthe Ferenc)
 További szereplők magyar hangja: Balázs Péter, Balázsi Gyula, Cs. Németh Lajos, Dallos Szilvia, Képessy József, Kránitz Lajos, Szabó Ottó, Szokolay Ottó, Trokán Péter, Varga T. József
 Díjak, jelölések
 Golden Screen-díj (1980)
 díj: Golden Screen
 Jupiter Award (1979)
 jelölés: legjobb nemzetközi színész (Jean-Paul Belmondo)
 Külső hivatkozások
 Emlékezetes párbeszédek a filmből francia nyelven
 1979 filmjei
 Francia filmvígjátékok
 Francia bűnügyi filmek
 Francia akciófilmek
 Francia filmdrámák
 Francia thrillerek
 Könyvadaptációk
 MOKÉP-filmek


text:
 Avis juridique important
 |
 21999D0410(02)
 Decisão n° 1/1999 do Conselho de Associação entre as Comunidades Europeias e os seus Estados-membros, por um lado, e a Roménia, por outro, de 26 de Fevereiro de 1999, que adopta os termos e as condições de participação da Roménia no programa comunitário para a promoção do rendimento energético - SAVE II
 Jornal Oficial no L 096 de 10/04/1999 p. 0019 - 0021
 DECISÃO N.o 1/1999 DO CONSELHO DE ASSOCIAÇÃOentre as Comunidades Europeias e os seus Estados-membros, por um lado, e a Roménia, por outrode 26 de Fevereiro de 1999que adopta os termos e as condições de participação da Roménia no programa comunitário para a promoção do rendimento energético - SAVE II(1999/248/CE, CECA, Euratom)O CONSELHO DE ASSOCIAÇÃO,Tendo em conta o Acordo Europeu que cria uma Associação entre as Comunidades Europeias e os seus Estados-membros, por um lado, e a Roménia, por outro(1),Tendo em conta o Protocolo Complementar do Acordo Europeu que cria uma Associação entre as Comunidades Europeias e os seus Estados-membros, por um lado, e a Roménia, por outro(2), no que respeita à participação da Roménia em programas comunitários e, nomeadamente, os seus artigos 1.o e 2.o,Considerando que, em conformidade com o artigo 1.o do referido protocolo, a Roménia pode participar em programas-quadro, programas específicos, projectos ou outras acções comunitários, designadamente no domínio da energia;Considerando que, em conformidade com o artigo 2.o do referido protocolo, os termos e as condições de participação da Roménia nas actividades referidas no artigo 1.o serão decididos pelo Conselho de Associação,DECIDE:Artigo 1.oA Roménia participará no programa da Comunidade Europeia SAVE II em conformidade com os termos e as condições definidos nos anexos I e II os quais fazem parte integrante da presente decisão.Artigo 2.oA presente decisão é aplicável durante todo o período de execução do programa SAVE II.Artigo 3.oA presente decisão entra em vigor no primeiro dia do mês seguinte ao dia da sua adopção.Feito em Bruxelas, em 26 de Fevereiro de 1999.Pelo Conselho de AssociaçãoO PresidenteJ. FISCHER(1) JO L 357 de 31.12.1994, p. 2.(2) JO L 317 de 30.12.1995, p. 40.ANEXO ITERMOS E CONDIÇÕES DE PARTICIPAÇÃO DA ROMÉNIA NO PROGRAMA COMUNITÁRIO PLURIANUAL PARA A PROMOÇÃO DO RENDIMENTO ENERGÉTICO - SAVE II1. Salvo disposições em contrário da presente decisão, a Roménia participará em todas as acções do programa comunitário plurianual para a promoção do rendimento energético - SAVE II (a seguir designado "SAVE II") em conformidade com os objectivos, critérios, procedimentos e prazos estabelecidos na Decisão 96/737/CE do Conselho, de 16 de Dezembro de 1996, relativa a um programa plurianual para a promoção do rendimento energético - SAVE II(1), relativamente a um programa quinquenal para a preparação e a execução, de uma forma rentável, de medidas e acções destinadas a fomentar o rendimento energético na Comunidade.2. Os termos e as condições para a apresentação, avaliação e selecção dos pedidos de instituições, organizações e pessoas singulares elegíveis da Roménia são os mesmos que os aplicáveis às instituições, organizações e pessoas singulares elegíveis da Comunidade, fixados dentro dos limites da contribuição financeira da Roménia, após dedução dos custos administrativos, tal como previsto no anexo II.3. Sempre que necessário e com vista a assegurar a dimensão comunitária da SAVE II, os projectos e as actividades transnacionais propostos pela Roménia devem incluir um número mínimo de parceiros dos Estados-membros da Comunidade. Este número mínimo de parceiros será decidido no âmbito da execução do SAVE II, em função da natureza das várias actividades, do número de parceiros de um dado projecto e do número de países que neles participem.4. A Roménia tomará todas as medidas necessárias para assegurar, a nível nacional, a coordenação e a organização da participação no SAVE II.5. A Roménia contribuirá anualmente para o orçamento geral das Comunidades Europeias para cobrir os custos decorrentes da sua participação no SAVE II (Ver anexo II).O Comité de Associação pode, sempre que necessário, adaptar essa contribuição.6. Os Estados-membros da Comunidade e a Roménia envidarão todos os esforços, no âmbito das actuais disposições, com vista a facilitarem a livre circulação e a residência de pessoas que se desloquem entre a Roménia e os Estados-membros da Comunidade com o objectivo de participarem em actividades abrangidas pela presente decisão.7. Sem prejuízo das responsabilidades que incumbem à Comissão e ao Tribunal de Contas das Comunidades Europeias no que respeita ao acompanhamento e à avaliação do SAVE II nos termos do artigo 5.o da Decisão 96/737/CE, a participação da Roménia no programa será objecto de controlo contínuo pela Roménia e pela Comissão das Comunidades Europeias num regime de parceria. A Roménia apresentará os relatórios necessários à Comissão e participará em outras actividades específicas organizadas pela Comunidade neste contexto.8. Sem prejuízo dos procedimentos referidos nos artigos 4.o e 5.o da Decisão 96/737/CE, a Roménia será convidada para reuniões de coordenação sobre questões relativas à execução da presente decisão que antecedem as reuniões ordinárias do Comité SAVE. A Comissão informará a Roménia sobre os resultados dessas reuniões ordinárias.9. O processo dos pedidos, contratos, relatórios a apresentar e outros documentos administrativos relativos ao programa SAVE II serão redigidos numa das línguas oficiais da Comunidade.(1) JO L 335 de 24.12.1996, p. 50.ANEXO IICONTRIBUIÇÃO FINANCEIRA DA ROMÉNIA PARA O SAVE II1. A contribuição financeira da Roménia destina-se a cobrir:- as subvenções ou qualquer outra ajuda financeira do programa concedidas aos participantes da Roménia,- os custos administrativos suplementares relacionados com a gestão do programa, incorridos pela Comissão das Comunidades Europeias e decorrentes da participação da Roménia.2. Para cada exercício financeiro, o montante total das subvenções ou de qualquer outra ajuda financeira concedidas, no âmbito do programa, aos beneficiários da Roménia não deve exceder o montante da contribuição paga pela Roménia, após dedução dos custos administrativos suplementares.No caso de a contribuição da Roménia para o orçamento geral das Comunidades Europeias exceder, após dedução dos custos administrativos suplementares, o montante total de subvenções ou de quaisquer outras ajudas financeiras concedidas, no âmbito do programa, aos beneficiários da Roménia, a Comissão transferirá o saldo para o exercício orçamental seguinte e deduzi-lo-á do montante da contribuição relativa a esse exercício. Se, após o termo do programa, esse saldo se mantiver, o montante correspondente será reembolsado à Roménia.3. A contribuição anual da Roménia é de 560106 ecus a partir de 1998. Deste montante um montante de 38106 ecus destina-se a cobrir os custos administrativos suplementares relacionados com a gestão do programa incorridos pela Comissão e decorrentes da participação da Roménia.4. É aplicável, designadamente no que respeita à gestão da contribuição da Roménia, o Regulamento Financeiro aplicável ao orçamento geral das Comunidades Europeias.Após a entrada em vigor da presente decisão e no início de cada ano, a Comissão enviará à Roménia um aviso de pagamento de fundos de valor equivalente à sua contribuição para os custos referidos na presente decisão.Esta contribuição será expressa em ecus e depositada numa conta bancária em ecus da Comissão.A contribuição da Roménia para os custos anuais referida na presente decisão efectuar-se-á de acordo com o aviso de pagamento de fundos e, o mais tardar, três meses após a data de envio do mesmo. Qualquer atraso no pagamento da contribuição ocasionará o pagamento pela Roménia de juros de mora a contar da data de vencimento. A taxa de juro corresponderá à taxa aplicada pelo Fundo Europeu de Cooperação Monetária para o mês da data de vencimento às suas operações em ecus(1), aumentada de 1,5 pontos percentuais.5. A Roménia suportará os custos administrativos suplementares referidos no ponto 3 a partir do seu orçamento nacional.6. A Roménia financiará um montante de 104400 ecus (1998), 261000 ecus (1999) e de 417600 ecus (2000) dos custos remanescentes da sua participação no SAVE II a partir do seu orçamento nacional.De acordo com os procedimentos de programação habituais do PHARE, os montantes remanescentes de 417600 ecus (1998), 261000 ecus (1999) e 104400 ecus (2000) serão financiados a partir das dotações anuais do PHARE para a Roménia.(1) Taxa publicada mensalmente no Jornal Oficial das Comunidades Europeias, série C.


text:
Il-Monasteru ta' Voroneț huwa monasteru Medjevali fil-villaġġ Rumen ta' Voroneț, li issa jifforma parti mir-raħal ta' Gura Humorului. Huwa wieħed mill-iktar monasteri mpittrin famużi min-Nofsinhar ta' Bukovina, fil-Kontea ta' Suceava. Il-monasteru nbena minn Stiefnu l-Kbir fl-1488 tul perjodu ta' tliet xhur u tliet ġimgħat biex ifakkar ir-rebħa fil-Battalja ta' Vaslui. Spiss jingħad li dan il-monasteru qisu l-"Kappella Sistina tal-Lvant". L-affreski tal-Monasteru ta' Voroneț għandhom sfumatura intensa ta' blu magħrufa fir-Rumanija bħala "l-blu ta' Voroneț".
 Il-monasteru jinsab fin-Nofsinhar ta' Gura Humorului fil-Kontea ta' Suceava, fil-wied tax- xmara Voroneț. Il-leġġenda tal-oriġini tal-knisja tgħaqqad żewġt irġiel ċentrali fl-istorja Rumena: il-fundatur tal-monasteru, Stiefnu l-Kbir, u San Danjel l-Eremita, l-ewwel superjuri tal-patrijiet tal-monasteru. Il-qabar ta' San Danjel jinsab fi ħdan il-monasteru.
 Il-knisja hija waħda mill-knejjes tal-Moldavja mniżżlin fil-lista tas-Siti ta' Wirt Dinji tal-UNESCO.
 Storja
 Mhux magħruf kemm għandu żmien is-sit monastiku. Hemm leġġenda li tgħid li Stiefnu l-Kbir, f'mument ta' kriżi waqt gwerra kontra t-Torok Ottomani, ġie għand l-iskete (komunità monastika) ta' Danjel l-Eremita f'Voronet u talbu parir. Danjel qallu biex ma jċedix fil-ġlieda. Imbagħad, wara r-rebħa, kellu jibni monasteru ddedikat lil San Ġorġ. Id-daħla oriġinali tal-Knisja ta' San Ġorġ, issa fl- exonarthex, għandha affresk bil-kitba li ġejja:
 "Jiena, Stiefnu, bil-Grazzja ta' Alla l-Mexxej tal-Moldavja, iben Bogdan, bdejt nibni l-monasteru ta' Voroneț biex nagħti ġieħ lill-qaddis rinomat San Ġorġ, il-martri l-kbir u rebbieħ, nhar it-Tnejn is-26 ta' Mejju tas-6996, wara l-Pentekoste, u l-kostruzzjoni tlestiet fl-istess sena f'Settembru tal-1488".
 Il-knisja nbniet skont pjanta bi tliet apsidi, presbiterju, naos bit-torri, u pronaos.
 Fl-1547, l-Isqof Metropolitan tal-Moldavja Grigorie Roșca żied l-exonarthex fin-naħa tal-Punent tal-knisja u ordna li l-ħitan ta' barra jiġu mpittrin ukoll. Il-kontribut tiegħu huwa rreġistrat fuq ix-xellug tad-daħla:
 "Bir-Rieda ta' Alla l-Missier u bl-Għajnuna ta' Ibnu u l-qilla tal-Ispirtu s-Santu, u permezz tat-tbatijiet kbar tal-fidil Kir Grigorie, il-Metropolitan tal-Moldavja kollha, ġie miżjud dan iz-zuntier titulari u l-ħitan esterni tal-knisja kollha ġew impittrin f'ġieħ ruħu fis-sena 7055 (1547)".
 Il-monasteru fih il-lapidi ta' San Danjel l-Eremita, ta' Grigorie Roșca, u ta' persuni notevoli u nobbli oħra tal-knisja.
 Ir-raħal ta' Voroneţ kien magħruf għall-iskola tal-kaligrafija tiegħu, fejn is-saċerdoti, il-qassisin u l-patrijiet kienu jitgħallmu jaqraw, jiktbu u jittraduċu t-testi reliġjużi. L-iskola pproduċiet żewġ kopji notevoli ta' traduzzjonijiet tal-Bibbja bir-Rumen: il-Kodiċi ta' Voroneț li ġie skopert fl-1871 u s-Salterju ta' Voroneț li nstab fl-1882. Dawn il-kotba issa jinsabu fl-Akkademja Rumena.
 Il-monasteru ġie abbandunat ftit wara l-1775, bl-annessjoni tal-parti tat-Tramuntana tal-Moldavja mill-Monarkija Asburga. Il-komunità monastika reġgħet lura f'Voroneț fl-1991. Mir-ritorn tagħhom, dawk li jgħixu fil-monasteru bnew akkomodazzjoni għas-sorijiet residenti, kappella, funtani, stalel, imtamar, u dar għall-pellegrini.
 Knisja
 Il-katholikon (il-knisja ewlenija) ta' San Ġorġ fil-Monasteru ta' Voroneț x'aktarx li hija l-iktar knisja famuża fir-Rumanija. Hija magħrufa mad-dinja kollha għall-affreski esterni tagħha b'kuluri jgħajtu u intensi, u għall-mijiet ta' wċuħ ippreservati tajjeb, impittrin fuq sfond blu-kaħlani rinomat tal-ażżurit. It-twieqi żgħar, l-oqfsa rettangolari u ċċangjati tagħhom, kif ukoll l-arkati fondi fuq ġewwa ġejjin għall-ponta, kollha huma fi stil Gotiku. Il-bibien tan-Nofsinhar u tat-Tramuntana tal-exonarthex tal-1547 għandhom oqfsa rettangolari, li jindikaw perjodu ta' tranżizzjoni mill-istil Gotiku għal dak Rinaxximentali. Iżda fuqhom, fuq kull ħajt hemm tieqa twila bi ħnejja Gotika pompuża. Il-faċċata kollha tal-Punent ma għandhiex fetħiet, u dan jindika li l-intenzjoni tal-Metropolitan Roșca mill-bidu nett kienet li jirriżervaha għall-affreski.
 Fil-faċċata tat-Tramuntana għadha tidher id-dekorazzjoni oriġinali tal-knisja, bir-ringieli ta' tondjaturi taċ-ċeramika tleqq bl-isfar, bil-kannella u bl-aħdar, imżejna b'riljiev. Dawn jinkludu motivi araldiċi, bħall-iljun rampanti u r-ras ta' speċi estinta ta' gendus tal-istemma araldika tal-Moldavja, u kreaturi ispirati mil-letteratura Medjevali tal-Ewropa tal-Punent, bħas-sireni b'żewġ dnieb. It-torri huwa mżejjen b'sittax-il niċċa għolja, u f'erbgħa minnhom hemm it-twieqi. Fuqhom hemm ringiela ta' niċeċ żgħar mad-dawra tat-torri. Is-saqaf frammentat x'aktarx li jsegwi l-għamla tas-saqaf oriġinali, li bla dubju kien magħmul b'biċċiet ċatti u tawwalin tal-għuda.
 Sit ta' Wirt Dinji
 Il-Monasteru ta' Voroneț huwa wieħed mit-tmien knejjes tal-Moldavja li ġew iddeżinjati bħala Sit ta' Wirt Dinji tal-UNESCO fl-1993.
 Il-valur universali straordinarju tas-sit ġie rrikonoxxut abbażi ta' żewġ kriterji tal-għażla tal-UNESCO: il-kriterju (i) "Rappreżentazzjoni ta' kapulavur frott il-kreattività tal-bniedem"; u l-kriterju (iv) "Eżempju straordinarju ta' tip ta' bini, ta' grupp ta' siti jew ta' pajsaġġ arkitettoniku jew teknoloġiku li joħroġ fid-dieher stadju/i sinifikanti fl-istorja tal-bniedem".
 Referenzi
 Siti ta' Wirt Dinji
 Rumanija
 Monasteri
 Knejjes


text:
 8.6.2012
 PL
 Dziennik Urzędowy Unii Europejskiej
 L 148/22
 ROZPORZĄDZENIE WYKONAWCZE KOMISJI (UE) NR 484/2012
 z dnia 7 czerwca 2012 r.
 ustalające maksymalną stawkę dopłat do prywatnego przechowywania oliwy z oliwek w ramach procedury przetargowej otwartej rozporządzeniem wykonawczym (UE) nr 430/2012
 KOMISJA EUROPEJSKA,
 uwzględniając Traktat o funkcjonowaniu Unii Europejskiej,
 uwzględniając rozporządzenie Rady (WE) nr 1234/2007 z dnia 22 października 2007 r. ustanawiające wspólną organizację rynków rolnych oraz przepisy szczegółowe dotyczące niektórych produktów rolnych („rozporządzenie o jednolitej wspólnej organizacji rynku”) (1), w szczególności jego art. 43 lit. d) w związku z jego art. 4,
 a także mając na uwadze, co następuje:
 (1)
 Rozporządzenie wykonawcze Komisji (UE) nr 430/2012 z dnia 22 maja 2012 r. otwierające procedurę przetargową w zakresie dopłat do prywatnego przechowywania oliwy z oliwek (2) przewiduje dwa podokresy składania ofert.
 (2)
 Zgodnie z art. 13 ust. 1 rozporządzenia Komisji (WE) nr 826/2008 z dnia 20 sierpnia 2008 r. ustanawiającego wspólne zasady dotyczące przyznawania dopłat do prywatnego przechowywania niektórych produktów rolnych (3), na podstawie ofert przekazanych przez państwa członkowskie Komisja decyduje albo o ustaleniu maksymalnej stawki dopłat albo o nieustalaniu maksymalnej stawki dopłat.
 (3)
 Na podstawie ofert złożonych w odpowiedzi na pierwszy przetarg częściowy należy ustalić maksymalną stawkę dopłat do prywatnego przechowywania oliwy z oliwek w ramach podokresu składania ofert kończącego się w dniu 5 czerwca 2012 r.
 (4)
 Aby wywołać szybką reakcję rynku oraz zapewnić efektywne zarządzanie przedmiotowym środkiem, niniejsze rozporządzenie powinno wejść w życie z dniem jego opublikowania w Dzienniku Urzędowym Unii Europejskiej.
 (5)
 Komitet Zarządzający ds. Wspólnej Organizacji Rynków Rolnych nie wydał opinii w terminie wyznaczonym przez jego przewodniczącego,
 PRZYJMUJE NINIEJSZE ROZPORZĄDZENIE:
 Artykuł 1
 W odniesieniu do podokresu składania ofert kończącego się w dniu 5 czerwca 2012 r., w ramach procedury przetargowej otwartej rozporządzeniem wykonawczym (UE) nr 430/2012, ustala się maksymalną stawkę dopłat do oliwy z oliwek w wysokości określonej w załączniku do niniejszego rozporządzenia.
 Artykuł 2
 Niniejsze rozporządzenie wchodzi w życie z dniem jego opublikowania w Dzienniku Urzędowym Unii Europejskiej.
 Niniejsze rozporządzenie wiąże w całości i jest bezpośrednio stosowane we wszystkich państwach członkowskich.
 Sporządzono w Brukseli dnia 7 czerwca 2012 r.
 W imieniu Komisji, za Przewodniczącego,
 José Manuel SILVA RODRÍGUEZ
 Dyrektor Generalny ds. Rolnictwa i Rozwoju Obszarów Wiejskich
 (1) Dz.U. L 299 z 16.11.2007, s. 1.
 (2) Dz.U. L 132 z 23.5.2012, s. 13.
 (3) Dz.U. L 223 z 21.8.2008, s. 3.
 ZAŁĄCZNIK
 Produkt
 Maksymalna kwota dopłaty
 (EUR/za tonę/dziennie)
 Oliwa z oliwek najwyższej jakości z pierwszego tłoczenia
 0,65
 Oliwa z oliwek z pierwszego tłoczenia
 0,65