text:
 Avis juridique important
 |
 21993D0519(01)
 Απόφαση αριθ. 1/93 της επιτροπής τελωνειακής συνεργασίας ΑΚΕ-ΕΟΚ της 16ης Απριλίου 1993 σχετικά με την παρέκκλιση από τον ορισμό της έννοιας «προϊόντα καταγωγής» για να ληφθεί υπόψη η ιδιαίτερη κατάσταση του Λεσότο όσον αφορά την παραγωγή ορισμένων ενδυμάτων
 Επίσημη Εφημερίδα αριθ. L 123 της 19/05/1993 σ. 0032 - 0033
 ΑΠΟΦΑΣΗ αριθ. 1/93 ΤΗΣ ΕΠΙΤΡΟΠΗΣ ΤΕΛΩΝΕΙΑΚΗΣ ΣΥΝΕΡΓΑΣΙΑΣ ΑΚΕ-ΕΟΚ της 16ης Απριλίου 1993 σχετικά με την παρέκκλιση από τον ορισμό της έννοιας «προϊόντα καταγωγής» για να ληφθεί υπόψη η ιδιαίτερη κατάσταση του Λεσότο όσον αφορά την παραγωγή ορισμένων ενδυμάτων(93/319/ΕΟΚ)Η ΕΠΙΤΡΟΠΗ ΤΗΣ ΤΕΛΩΝΕΙΑΚΗΣ ΣΥΝΕΡΓΑΣΙΑΣ ΑΚΕ-ΕΟΚ, Έχοντας υπόψη την τέταρτη σύμβαση ΑΚΕ-ΕΟΚ που υπογράφηκε στη Λομέ στις 15 Δεκεμβρίου 1989, και ιδίως το άρθρο 31 παράγρφος 9 του πρωτοκόλλου της αριθ. 1, Εκτιμώντας: ότι στο άρθρο 31 του πρωτοκόλλου αριθ. 1 της σύμβασης σχετικά με τον ορισμό της έννοιας «προϊόντα καταγωγής» και τις μεθόδους διοικητικής συνεργασίας, προβλέπονται παρεκκλίσεις στο εν λόγω πρωτόκολλο στις οποίες προβαίνει η επιτροπή τελωνειακής συνεργασίας για να διευκολύνει την ανάπτυξη βιομηχανιών που υπάρχουν ή τη δημιουργία νέων βιομηχανιών 7 ότι η απόφαση αριθ. 1/91 της επιτροπής τελωνειακής συνεργασίας ΕΟΚ-ΑΚΕ (1) χορήγησε παρέκκλιση από τον ορισμό που αναφέρεται στο πρωτόκολλο αριθ. 1 όσον αφορά ορισμένα ενδύματα 7 ότι τα κράτη της Αφρικής, της Καραϊβικής και του Ειρηνικού (ΑΚΕ) παρουσίασαν αίτηση της κυβέρνησης του Λεσότο που έχει στόχο την επίτευξη παράτασης της εν λόγω απόφασης μέχρι την 1η Μαρτίου 1996 7 ότι η επέκταση της παρέκκλισης ζητήθηκε για ορισμένα πλεκτά ενδύματα 7 ότι η αιτούμενη παρέκκλιση είναι αιτιολογημένη βάσει των σχετικών διατάξεων του πρωτοκόλλου αριθ. 1 και ότι δεν μορεί να προξενήσει σοβαρή ζημία σε βιομηχανία που είναι εγκατεστημένη στην Κοινότητα, υπό την προϋπόθεση ότι τηρούνται ορισμένοι όροι σχετικά με τις ποσότητες, την επιτήρηση ή τη διάρκεια, ΑΠΟΦΑΣΙΖΕΙ: Άρθρο 1 Κατά παρέκκλιση από τις ειδικές διατάξεις του παραρτήματος ΙΙ του πρωτοκόλλου αριθ. 1, τα προϊόντα που απαριθμούνται στο παράρτημα της παρούσας απόφασης, τα οποία κατασκευάζονται στο Λεσότο, θεωρούνται ότι είναι καταγωγής των χωρών ΑΚΕ υπό τις προϋποθέσεις που αναφέρονται παρακάτω. Άρθρο 2 Η παρέκκλιση που προβλέπεται στο άρθρο 1 αφορά τα προϊόντα που εξάγονται από το Λεσότο στην Κοινότητα μεταξύ της 1ης Μαρτίου 1993 και 28ης Φεβρουαρίου 1996 για τις ετήσιες ποσότητες που αναφέρονται σε παράρτημα. Άρθρο 3 Οι αρμόδιες αρχές του Λεσότο λαμβάνουν τα αναγκαία μέτρα για να εξασφαλίσουν τον ποσοτικό έλεγχο των εξαγωγών των προϊόντων που αναφέρονται στο άρθρο 1. Για το σκοπό αυτό, όλα τα πιστοποιητικά που αυτές εκδίδουν στο πλαίσιο της παρούσας παρέκκλισης, κάνουν αναφορά στην παρούσα απόφαση. Οι αρμόδιες αρχές του Λεσότο διαβιβάζουν στην Επιτροπή, ανά τρίμηνο, λεπτομερή κατάσταση με τις ποσότητες για τις οποίες έχουν εκδοθεί πιστοποιητικά κυκλοφορίας EUR. 1 με βάση την παρούσα απόφαση, αναφέροντας σ' αυτήν τους αριθμούς των εκδοθέντων πιστοποιητικών. Άρθρο 4 Οι χώρες ΑΚΕ, η Κοινότητα και τα κράτη μέλη υποχρεούνται, από την πλευρά τους, να λάβουν τα αναγκαία μέτρα για την εφαρμογή της παρούσας απόφασης. Άρθρο 5 Η παρούσα απόφαση αρχίζει να ισχύει από τις 16 Απριλίου 1993. Βρυξέλλες, 16 Απριλίου 1993. Για την επιτροπή τελωνειακής συνεργασίας ΑΚΕ-ΕΟΚ Οι Πρόεδροι Francis K. MUTHAURA P. WILMOTT ΠΑΡΑΡΤΗΜΑ >ΘΕΣΗ ΠΗΝΑΚΑ>


type: other

text:
SHSČMS: Stanovy
 Stanovy SHS ČMS ke stažení ve formátu Microsoft Word §1 Název §2 Sídlo §3 Účel Sdružení §4 Předmět činnosti Sdružení §5 Členství ve Sdružení §6 Práva a povinnosti členů §7 Členské příspěvky §8 Zánik členství §9 Vzájemné závazky §10 Orgány Sdružení §11 Sněm §12 Výbor Sdružení §13 Předsednictvo §14 Kontrolní komise §15 Odborné komise §16 Krajské sekce §17 Sekretariát §18 Konference a semináře §19 Majetek Sdružení §20 Zrušení a zánik Sdružení §21 Jednání a podepisování za Sdružení §22 Závěrečná ustanovení §1 Název
 K dosažení cíle a naplnění účelu Sdružení zejména: popularizuje, zveřejňuje a propaguje význam, souvislosti a problémy kulturního dědictví, především historických sídel, pořádá veřejnosti přístupné kulturní, společenské a propagační akce (přednášky, výstavy, odborné semináře a konference apod.), vydává tiskoviny propagující témata související s účelem a cílem Sdružení a s jeho aktivitami, zveřejňuje problémy a specifika historických sídel, uplatňuje specifické problémy historických sídel při úpravě právních norem a navrhování nových právních norem, které ovlivňují ekonomické a právní postavení obcí i jejich hospodaření, poskytuje veřejnosti informační služby, jimiž naplňuje účel a cíle Sdružení, a to včetně užití a přístupu k veřejně provozovaným informačním a datovým sítím, popularizuje a zveřejňuje účel Sdružení a jeho činnosti, jakož i činnosti svých členů, i prostřednictvím veřejně přístupných informačních a datových sítí, spolupracuje s organizacemi a institucemi s posláním shodným s cíli Sdružení, které působí v ČR i v zahraničí, a to především s krajskými úřady, ministerstvy a Národním památkovým ústavem. §5 Členství ve Sdružení
 ((1) Členství je řádné a přidružené. Řádné a přidružené členy přijímá předsednictvo. Součástí písemné přihlášky člena je i souhlas se stanovami Sdružení. Aktuální seznam všech členů je vždy předložen sněmu, který jej bere na vědomí, a vydán jako příloha usnesení sněmu. (2) Řádným členem může být pouze obec (ve smyslu zákona č. 128/2000 Sb., o obcích /obecní zřízení/ v platném znění a zákona 131/2001 Sb., o hl. městě Praze v platném znění), u statutárních měst i jejich části, a to za splnění následujících podmínek: a) podání písemné přihlášky schválené zastupitelstvem obce či městské části s uvedením jména a funkce osoby, která bude jménem obce jako člena Sdružení ve Sdružení jednat; v případě, že touto osobou nebude starosta či primátor, místostarosta či náměstek primátora, ale jiná pověřená fyzická osoba, je třeba k přihlášce doložit písemnou plnou moc k jednání ve Sdružení za obec či městskou část s uvedením usnesení zastupitelstva nebo rady obce či městské části o zastupování (dále jen jiná pověřená osoba); v přihlášce je člen povinen uvést aktuální počet obyvatel obce nebo městské části ke dni podání přihlášky, b) souhlasné přijetí obce či městské části za člena Sdružení předsednictvem, které bude zaznamenáno v písemném záznamu z jednání předsednictva. (3) Přidruženým členem může být jiná právnická osoba než obec, a to za splnění následujících podmínek: a) podání písemné přihlášky s uvedením statutárního orgánu (fyzické osoby nebo fyzické osoby jako člena kolektivního statutárního orgánu oprávněného za právnickou osobu jednat), která bude jménem právnické osoby jako člena Sdružení jednat, b) souhlasné přijetí jiné právnické osoby předsednictvem, které bude zaznamenáno v písemném záznamu z jednání předsednictva. (4) Členství ve Sdružení vzniká dnem přijetí předsednictvem. Přijetí za člena Sdružení je členovi písemně oznámeno; člen je povinen nejpozději do 30 dnů poté, kdy se dozví o přijetí za člena Sdružení, zaplatit vstupní členský příspěvek; nezaplacení vstupního členského příspěvku včas a řádně je důvodem pro vyloučení člena Sdružení. §6 Práva a povinnosti členů
 a) Práva řádných členů: účastnit se jednání sněmu, příslušné krajské sekce a být informován o výsledku jejich jednání, volit a být volen do výboru Sdružení, předsednictva a kontrolní komise, pracovat v odborných komisích ustavených výborem Sdružení, podávat orgánům Sdružení návrhy, podněty a stížnosti a být vyrozuměn o jejich vyřízení, hlasovat na sněmu a při rozhodování orgánů Sdružení, do nichž jsou zvoleni, účastnit se aktivit a činností Sdružení a být o nich informován. b) Povinnosti řádných členů: dodržovat stanovy Sdružení a respektovat rozhodnutí orgánů Sdružení, platit řádně a včas členské příspěvky, přispívat aktivně k naplňování účelu a cíle Sdružení, písemně oznamovat změny v identifikaci fyzické osoby, která je zmocněna zastupovat člena na jednáních a činnostech Sdružení, vždy do 10. ledna oznámit aktuální počet obyvatel obce k 1. lednu; pokud tuto povinnost nesplní, je povinen zaplatit členský příspěvek podle posledního údaje o počtu obyvatel, který oznámil. (2) Práva a povinnosti přidružených členů: a) Práva přidružených členů: podávat orgánům Sdružení návrhy, podněty a stížnosti a být vyrozuměn o jejich vyřízení, účastnit se akcí pořádaných Sdružením a být o nich informován. b) Povinnosti přidružených členů:
 dodržovat stanovy Sdružení a respektovat rozhodnutí orgánů Sdružení, platit řádně a včas členské příspěvky, přispívat v rámci svých možností k naplňování účelu a cíle Sdružení, písemně oznamovat změny v identifikaci fyzické osoby, která je zmocněna zastupovat člena na jednáních a činnostech Sdružení. §7 Členské příspěvky
 (1) Členské příspěvky jsou vstupní a roční; jejich výše je pro řádné a přidružené členy stanovena diferencovaně. (2) Výši členských příspěvků pro řádné členy, lhůty a způsob placení stanovuje sněm svým usnesením. (3) Výši členských příspěvků pro přidružené členy, lhůty a způsob placení stanovuje výbor Sdružení svým rozhodnutím. (4) Pro nové členy Sdružení platí, že výše jejich vstupního členského příspěvku v roce přijetí do Sdružení je určena podílem ve dvanáctinách ze stanoveného ročního členského příspěvku pro ten který kalendářní rok, počínaje měsícem, v němž novému členu vzniklo členství ve Sdružení. §8 Zánik členství
 a) vystoupením, b) vyloučením, c) zánikem člena jako právnické osoby. (2) Vystoupení člena ze Sdružení musí být oznámeno písemně výboru Sdružení. Za termín vystoupení je považováno datum doručení písemného oznámení o vystoupení sekretariátu Sdružení. Členské příspěvky zaplacené ke dni vystoupení se nevracejí. (3) Vyloučení člena ze Sdružení je mimořádným způsobem zániku členství a musí být: a) projednáno a odsouhlaseno výborem Sdružení, b) sděleno vylučovanému členovi písemně a s uvedením důvodu vyloučení. Vyloučením členství ve Sdružení zaniká uplynutím třicátého dne od doručení písemného oznámení o vyloučení člena, odeslaného sekretariátem Sdružení, pokud se člen před uplynutím této lhůty neodvolá. Odvolání musí být učiněno v písemné formě a doručeno Sdružení ve lhůtě třiceti dnů od doručení písemného oznámení o vyloučení členovi Sdružení, jinak je neúčinné. (4) Proti rozhodnutí výboru Sdružení o vyloučení může podat člen odvolání ke kontrolní komisi Sdružení prostřednictvím sekretariátu Sdružení. V případě včas a řádně podaného odvolání člena je jeho členství pozastaveno s tím, že po dobu pozastavení členství nejsou účinná ani práva, ani povinnosti člena. Kontrolní komise musí rozhodnout o odvolání člena proti rozhodnutí výboru Sdružení nejpozději do tří měsíců od doručení odvolání člena. Rozhodnutí o odvolání musí kontrolní komise neprodleně písemně oznámit členu Sdružení a výboru Sdružení. V případě vyloučení člena se členské příspěvky zaplacené ke dni vyloučení nevracejí. §9 Vzájemné závazky
 (1) Orgány Sdružení jsou: a) sněm, b) výbor Sdružení, c) předsednictvo, d) kontrolní komise, e) krajské sekce. (2) Statutárním orgánem Sdružení je předsednictvo; předsednictvo je oprávněno jednat jménem Sdružení ve všech věcech. (3) Při jednání jménem Sdružení jsou předsednictvo, předseda a místopředsedové povinni respektovat přijatá rozhodnutí orgánů Sdružení. (4) Vrcholným orgánem Sdružení je sněm. (5) Funkční období orgánů Sdružení je čtyřleté. (6) K zajištění provozních záležitostí Sdružení je zřízen sekretariát. §11 Sněm
 (1) Sněm je vrcholným orgánem Sdružení, je shromážděním řádných a přidružených členů Sdružení. (2) Sněm je řádný nebo mimořádný; řádný sněm se koná jedenkrát za čtyři roky. Orgánem oprávněným ke svolání sněmu je výbor Sdružení. (3) Řádný sněm svolává výbor Sdružení vždy do šesti měsíců ode dne voleb do obecních zastupitelstev. O svolání a návrhu programu informuje výbor Sdružení všechny členy. Návrhy základních dokumentů navržených k projednání sněmem zašle výbor Sdružení všem členům nejpozději tři týdny před termínem konání sněmu. Připomínky k zaslaným návrhům mohou členové vyjádřit pouze písemně, a to nejpozději týden před zahájením sněmu. (4) Řádný sněm: posuzuje činnost Sdružení a orgánů Sdružení z hlediska naplňování účelu a cíle Sdružení a zejména schvaluje koncepci činnosti Sdružení na další období, která je základním dokumentem k činnosti Sdružení, resp. jeho směřování, projednává a schvaluje výsledky činnosti a hospodaření Sdružení za období od minulého sněmu a zprávu kontrolní komise, schvaluje výši členských příspěvků řádných členů, lhůty a způsob jejich placení na další období, rozhoduje o majetku Sdružení, schvaluje změny nebo doplnění stanov Sdružení, schvaluje jednací řád sněmu, schvaluje volební řád Sdružení, volí členy výboru Sdružení, volí členy kontrolní komise, bere na vědomí aktuální seznam členů a udělení čestného uznání za činnost pro Sdružení. (5) Mimořádný sněm může být svolán na základě rozhodnutí řádného sněmu. Výbor Sdružení je povinen svolat mimořádný sněm v těchto případech:
 jestliže o to požádá písemně alespoň jedna pětina řádných členů, jestliže počet členů výboru Sdružení klesne o jednu třetinu. (6) Při svolání mimořádného sněmu musí být stanoven předmět jednání. (7) Sněm rozhoduje usnesením. Způsob rozhodování sněmu stanovuje jednací řád sněmu.
 (1) Výbor Sdružení řídí činnost Sdružení mezi sněmy a odpovídá za hospodaření a majetek Sdružení. Činnost výboru Sdružení řídí předseda. (2) Členem výboru Sdružení může být pouze obec nebo městská část. (3) Počet členů výboru Sdružení je určen uspořádáním obcí do vyšších územně správních celků (krajů) podle Ústavy, přičemž každý kraj zastupují tři zástupci. Počet členů výboru Sdružení podle tohoto klíče činí 42 obcí nebo městských částí. (4) Pokud by členové některého z krajů nebyli schopni obsadit příslušné tři zástupce do výboru Sdružení je možné, aby ze zbývajících krajů byl navržen jejich čtvrtý zástupce, přičemž přednost mají kraje s největším počtem členů. (5) Výbor Sdružení je volen sněmem v souladu s volebním a jednacím řádem sněmu; kandidáty na členy výboru Sdružení navrhují krajské sekce. (6) Výbor Sdružení volí z fyzických osob, které jednají jménem obcí nebo městských částí, které jsou členy výboru Sdružení předsednictvo, to znamená, předsedu, prvního a druhého místopředsedu (dále jen místopředsedové) a jedenáct členů předsednictva. Zvolení předseda a oba místopředsedové předsednictva jsou zároveň předsedou a místopředsedy výboru Sdružení a jako předseda a místopředsedové kolektivního statutárního orgánu Sdružení vystupují i vůči veřejnosti a jednají navenek za Sdružení. Každý člen předsednictva je současně garantem krajské sekce. Kandidáty na členy předsednictva navrhují členové výboru Sdružení zastoupení v jednotlivých krajských sekcích, a to po jednom z každé krajské sekce na návrh krajské sekce. Pokud některá krajská sekce nenavrhne svého kandidáta, na toto volné místo v předsednictvu může být navržen jiný člen výboru Sdružení. (7) Výbor Sdružení je usnášeníschopný, je-li jednání přítomna nadpoloviční většina jeho členů. Člen výboru, který se na jednání výboru nemůže dostavit, může písemně zmocnit jiného člena výboru Sdružení zastupováním a hlasováním na jednání výboru Sdružení. Hlasování je rovné a přímé.Člen výboru Sdružení, který má písemné zmocnění od jiného člena ( členů ) výboru Sdružení, má ke svému hlasu ještě tolik hlasů, kolik má zmocnění od jiných nepřítomných členů výboru Sdružení; při rovnosti hlasů rozhoduje hlas předsedy vyjma rozhodnutí o vyloučení člena ze Sdružení. (8) Pro zabezpečení odborných úkolů může výbor Sdružení ustavit odborné komise, pracovní nebo expertní skupiny apod. (9) Jednání výboru Sdružení se s hlasem poradním zúčastňuje tajemník a předseda kontrolní komise. (10) Výbor Sdružení rozhoduje o vyloučení člena Sdružení ze Sdružení a rozhoduje o udělení čestného uznání za činnost pro Sdružení. (11) Výbor Sdružení projednává a schvaluje rozpočet a účetní závěrku Sdružení. O výsledcích hospodaření za uplynulý kalendářní rok a plánu činnosti na nový kalendářní rok informuje výbor Sdružení všechny členy, a to do 30. 4. běžného roku. (12) Pravidelné schůze výboru Sdružení se konají podle ročního plánu činnosti nejméně dvakrát ročně a svolává je z pověření předsedy tajemník. Na základě podané písemné žádosti, nejméně deseti členů výboru Sdružení, předsedovi Sdružení, a ten zajistí do 15 dnů uskutečnění mimořádné schůze výboru Sdružení. Žádost musí obsahovat předmět jednání. §13 Předsednictvo
 (1) Předsednictvo je statutárním orgánem Sdružení. (2) Předsednictvo má celkem 14 členů a je tvořeno předsedou, dvěma místopředsedy a jedenácti členy předsednictva; členy předsednictva mohou být jen fyzické osoby. (3) Předseda, místopředsedové a 11 členů předsednictva jsou voleni výborem Sdružení. Způsobilost být zvolen do funkce předsedy či místopředsedy je podmíněna výkonem funkce starosty, primátora, místostarosty či náměstka primátora. Způsobilost být zvolen za člena předsednictva nemají jiné pověřené osoby jednající ve Sdružení za člena Sdružení v souladu s ustanovením § 5 odst. 2, písm. a) Stanov. Zvolení předseda a místopředsedové předsednictva jsou zároveň předsedou a místopředsedy výboru Sdružení a jako předseda a místopředsedové kolektivního statutárního orgánu Sdružení vystupují i vůči veřejnosti a jednají navenek za Sdružení. Každý člen předsednictva je současně garantem krajské sekce. (4) Pokud některá z osob svoji způsobilost stanovenou v odstavci 3 tohoto článku pozbude, její členství v předsednictvu zaniká a je třeba provést doplňovací volby. Doplňovací volby budou provedeny na nejbližší schůzi výboru Sdružení. (5) Předsednictvo řídí činnost Sdružení mezi zasedáními výboru Sdružení a je oprávněno učinit i nezbytné rozpočtové změny do rozsahu delegovaného výborem Sdružení. (6) Předsednictvo je usnášeníschopné, je-li jednání přítomna nadpoloviční většina jeho členů. Hlasování je rovné a přímé, každý člen předsednictva má jeden hlas. Předsednictvo rozhoduje prostou většinou hlasů přítomných členů předsednictva; při rovnosti hlasů rozhoduje hlas předsedy. (7) Předsednictvo Sdružení jmenuje tajemníka a stanovuje takové jeho kompetence, které nevyplývají přímo ze stanov Sdružení. (8) Jednání předsednictva se s hlasem poradním zúčastňuje tajemník a předseda kontrolní komise. (9) Předsednictvo může v případě naléhavé potřeby hlasovat per rolam. §14 Kontrolní komise
 (1) Kontrolní komise je kontrolním orgánem Sdružení. Členy kontrolní komise mohou být pouze obce nebo městské části. Kontrolní komise má 14 členů, vždy po jednom z krajů, přičemž každý kraj zastupuje jeden zástupce; počet členů kontrolní komise podle tohoto klíče činí celkem 14 obcí nebo městských částí. (2) Kontrolní komise je volena sněmem v souladu s volebním a jednacím řádem sněmu; kandidáty na členy kontrolní komise navrhují krajské sekce. (3) Členové kontrolní komise volí ze svého středu předsedu kontrolní komise. (4) Kontrolní komise dohlíží na dodržování stanov Sdružení a obecně závazných předpisů v činnosti Sdružení, prověřuje stížnosti a oznámení, navrhuje opatření k nápravě zjištěných nedostatků a kontroluje plnění úkolů programového prohlášení a usnesení sněmu. Rozhoduje o odvolání člena proti vyloučení. Vždy do 31. 3. každého roku provádí kontrolu činnosti a hospodaření Sdružení za uplynulý rok a předkládá výboru Sdružení písemnou zprávu o jejím výsledku. (5) Kontrolní komise vypracovává a předkládá řádnému sněmu souhrnnou kontrolní zprávu za období od minulého sněmu. (6) Kontrolní komise je usnášeníschopná, je-li jednání přítomna nadpoloviční většina jejích členů. Hlasování je rovné a přímé, každý člen kontrolní komise má jeden hlas. Kontrolní komise rozhoduje prostou většinou hlasů přítomných členů kontrolní komise; při rovnosti hlasů rozhoduje hlas předsedy kontrolní komise. (7) Předseda kontrolní komise se zúčastňuje schůzí výboru Sdružení a předsednictva s hlasem poradním. (8) Členové kontrolní komise nemohou být zároveň členy jiných orgánů Sdružení s výjimkou krajských sekcí a odborných komisí. (9) Jednání kontrolní komise svolává předseda kontrolní komise. Jednání kontrolní komise se koná nejméně jedenkrát ročně. Jednání kontrolní komise je její předseda povinen svolat vždy, je-li toho třeba k projednání odvolání člena Sdružení proti jeho vyloučení ze Sdružení, a to tak, aby byla dodržena lhůta pro rozhodnutí kontrolní komise o tomto odvolání vyloučeného člena podle § 8 odst. 4 těchto stanov. §15 Odborné komise
 (1) Pro řešení aktuálních problémů může výbor Sdružení ustavit odborné komise nebo expertní skupiny apod. z členů Sdružení a přizvaných odborníků. (2) Předsedou odborné komise je zpravidla člen výboru Sdružení. §16 Krajské sekce
 (1) Krajské sekce jsou tvořeny členy Sdružení se sídlem v krajích podle Ústavy. (2) Krajská sekce je orgánem Sdružení, jehož prostřednictvím jsou členové v daném regionu informováni o činnosti výboru Sdružení a předsednictva. (3) Krajské sekce jsou oprávněny podávat podněty a doporučení jiným orgánům Sdružení. (4) Každá krajská sekce v souladu s těmito stanovami a volebním řádem Sdružení navrhuje sněmu kandidáty na své zástupce do výboru Sdružení a do kontrolní komise. Pro výbor Sdružení navrhuje tři kandidáty, z nichž jednoho pro předsednictvo. Pro kontrolní komisi navrhuje jednoho kandidáta. (5) Zasedání krajských sekcí se konají nejméně dvakrát ročně, svolává a řídí je garant krajské sekce - člen předsednictva za příslušný kraj. Tento garant zve na zasedání všechny řádné i přidružené členy v kraji, zástupce kraje a příslušného územního pracoviště Národního památkového ústavu. Na pozvání garanta se mohou jednání krajské sekce zúčastnit i zástupci obcí příslušného kraje, které nejsou členy Sdružení, případně jiné osoby. §17 Sekretariát
 (1) Provozní a organizační záležitosti Sdružení zajišťuje sekretariát. Sekretariát řídí tajemník. (2) Tajemník je jmenován do funkce předsednictvem Sdružení. Jmenování musí obsahovat i písemné zmocnění tajemníka k zastupování Sdružení, tj. udělení plné moci (ve smyslu § 31 - § 33b zákona č. 40/1964 Sb. Občanského zákoníku v platném znění), jinak tajemník nemá oprávnění činit za Sdružení právní úkony. Tajemník je zaměstnancem Sdružení. (3) Do působnosti tajemníka patří: · zajištění vedení organizační agendy Sdružení, · zajištění vedení účetnictví Sdružení, · informační činnost Sdružení pro členy, · hospodaření s prostředky v objemu a struktuře schváleného rozpočtu Sdružení, · přijímání dalších pracovníků na základě schválení předsednictva Sdružení. (4) Tajemník plní další povinnosti vyplývající ze stanov Sdružení a o své činnosti je povinen informovat předsednictvo. (5) Ve vztahu k zaměstnancům sekretariátu plní tajemník funkci statutárního orgánu Sdružení jako zaměstnavatele, ve vztahu k tajemníkovi vykonávají tuto funkci předseda a místopředsedové předsednictva. §18 Konference a semináře
 (1) Pro řešení závažných aktuálních otázek souvisejících s účelem, cílem a předmětem činnosti Sdružení se nejméně jednou za dva roky koná odborná konference nebo seminář. (2) Výsledkem konference nebo semináře jsou návrhy a doporučení pro činnost orgánů Sdružení a podněty pro Ministerstvo kultury, vládu a Parlament ČR. §19 Majetek Sdružení
 (1) Majetkem Sdružení mohou být věci, práva a peníze. (2) Sdružení majetek získává: členskými příspěvky, dary, činností Sdružení. (3) Za majetek a hospodaření Sdružení odpovídá výbor Sdružení. Prodej nebo zástava nemovitého majetku Sdružení mohou být uskutečněny pouze na základě rozhodnutí sněmu. Evidence majetku a účetnictví Sdružení se řídí platnými předpisy. (4) V případě zániku Sdružení bez právního nástupce se v souladu s ust. § 20j Občanského zákoníku vyžaduje likvidace; pro likvidaci Sdružení se v souladu s ust. § 20a odst. 4 Občanského zákoníku přiměřeně použijí ustanovení Obchodního zákoníku o likvidaci obchodních společností.
 (1) Sdružení může zrušit svým rozhodnutím sněm. K rozhodnutí o zrušení Sdružení je zapotřebí třípětinové většiny hlasů všech řádných členů Sdružení. (2) V rozhodnutí sněmu o zrušení Sdružení musí být uvedeno, zda je určen právní nástupce a zda jmění Sdružení přechází na určeného právního nástupce a za jakých podmínek. (3) V případě, že není určen právní nástupce, určí sněm likvidátora a postup likvidace dle platných právních norem a zároveň sněm určí, jak bude naloženo s likvidačním zůstatkem. (4) Sněm schválí návrh na výmaz z registrace a určí osobu odpovědnou za podání tohoto návrhu. (5) Sdružení zaniká výmazem z registrace ve smyslu ust.§ 20j odst. 2 zákona č. 40/1964 Sb., Občanského zákoníku v platném znění. §21 Jednání a podepisování za Sdružení
 (1) Sdružení jedná a rozhoduje svým statutárním orgánem, kterým je předsednictvo. (2) Za předsednictvo jednají navenek jménem Sdružení předseda a místopředsedové, každý samostatně. (3) Za Sdružení jedná samostatně též tajemník v souladu s těmito stanovami, na základě a v rozsahu udělené písemné plné moci. (4) Jednat za Sdružení jako zástupce mohou i jiné zmocněné osoby, všechny však v rozsahu udělené písemné plné moci. (5) Za Sdružení podepisují předseda a místopředsedové každý samostatně, a to tak, že k vytištěnému, otištěnému nebo vypsanému názvu Sdružení připojí svůj vlastnoruční podpis s uvedením funkce. (6) Za Sdružení podepisuje samostatně též tajemník v souladu s těmito stanovami, na základě udělené písemné plné moci a způsobem v ní uvedeným. (7) Za Sdružení mohou podepisovat i jiné osoby, všechny však pouze v rozsahu udělené písemné plné moci a způsobem v ní uvedeným. §22 Závěrečná ustanovení
 (1) (1) Stanovy mohou být měněny nebo doplněny pouze rozhodnutím sněmu s výjimkou změny sídla Sdružení, o níž rozhoduje výbor Sdružení. (2) Tyto stanovy schválil dne 12. dubna 2007 VII. řádný sněm Sdružení s tím, že platnosti a účinnosti nabývají tyto stanovy tímto dnem a současně pozbývají účinnosti stanovy Sdružení schválené VI. řádným sněmem Sdružení historických sídel Čech, Moravy a Slezska dne 20. března 2003 v Třeboni. V Brně 12. dubna 2007 O Sdružení


type: caselaw

jurisdiction: EU

text:
 8.3.2008
 HU
 Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja
 C 64/35
 Az Elsőfokú Bíróság 2008. január 24-i ítélete – Dorel Juvenile Group kontra OHIM (SAFETY 1ST)
 (T-88/06. sz. ügy) (1)
 („Közösségi védjegy - A SAFETY 1ST közösségi szóvédjegy bejelentése - Feltétlen kizáró ok - A leíró jelleg hiánya - A 40/94/EK rendelet 7. cikke (1) bekezdésének b) pontja’)
 (2008/C 64/55)
 Az eljárás nyelve: angol
 Felek
 Felperes: Dorel Juvenile Group, Inc. (Canton, Egyesült Államok) (képviselő: G. Simon ügyvéd)
 Alperes: Belső Piaci Harmonizációs Hivatal (védjegyek és formatervezési minták) (képviselő: Ó. Mondéjar Ortuño meghatalmazott)
 Az ügy tárgya
 Az OHIM második fellebbezési tanácsának 2006. január 11-i (R 616/2004-2. sz. ügy), a „SAFETY 1ST” szóvédjegy közösségi védjegyként való lajstromozás iránti kérelemére vonatkozó határozata ellen benyújtott kereset.
 Az ítélet rendelkező része
 1)
 Az Elsőfokú Bíróság a keresetet elutasítja.
 2)
 Az Elsőfokú Bíróság a Dorel Juvenile Group, Inc.-et kötelezi a költségek viselésére.
 (1) HL C 108., 2006.5.6.


text:
 7.9.2015
 RO
 Jurnalul Oficial al Uniunii Europene
 C 294/3
 Hotărârea Curții (Marea Cameră) din 1 iulie 2015 (cerere de decizie preliminară formulată de Bundesverwaltungsgericht – Germania) – Bund für Umwelt und Naturschutz Deutschland e.V./Bundesrepublik Deutschland
 (Cauza C-461/13) (1)
 ([Trimitere preliminară - Mediu - Politica Uniunii Europene în domeniul apei - Directiva 2000/60/CE - Articolul 4 alineatul (1) - Obiective de mediu referitoare la apele de suprafață - Deteriorarea stării unui corp de apă de suprafață - Proiect de amenajare a unei căi navigabile - Obligația statelor membre de a nu autoriza un proiect care poate provoca o deteriorare a stării unui corp de apă de suprafață - Criterii determinante pentru a aprecia existența unei deteriorări a stării unui corp de apă])
 (2015/C 294/04)
 Limba de procedură: germana
 Instanța de trimitere
 Bundesverwaltungsgericht
 Părțile din procedura principală
 Reclamantă: Bund für Umwelt und Naturschutz Deutschland e.V.
 Pârâtă: Bundesrepublik Deutschland
 cu participarea: Freie Hansestadt Bremen
 Dispozitivul
 1)
 Articolul 4 alineatul (1) litera (a) punctele (i)-(iii) din Directiva 2000/60/CE a Parlamentului European și a Consiliului din 23 octombrie 2000 de stabilire a unui cadru de politică comunitară în domeniul apei trebuie interpretat în sensul că statele membre au obligația, cu excepția cazului în care se acordă o derogare, să refuze autorizarea unui proiect special atunci când acesta poate cauza o deteriorare a stării unui corp de apă de suprafață sau atunci când afectează obținerea unei stări bune a apelor de suprafață sau a unui potențial ecologic bun și a unei stări chimice bune a acestor ape la data prevăzută de directiva menționată.
 2)
 Noțiunea „deteriorare a stării” unui corp de apă de suprafață, care figurează la articolul 4 alineatul (1) litera (a) punctul (i) din Directiva 2000/60, trebuie interpretată în sensul că există o deteriorare de îndată ce starea a cel puțin unu dintre elementele de calitate, în sensul anexei V la directiva menționată, se degradează cu o clasă, chiar dacă această degradare nu se traduce printr-o degradare de clasificare, în ansamblul său, a corpului de apă de suprafață. Cu toate acestea, în cazul în care elementul de calitate în cauză, în sensul anexei menționate, figurează deja în clasa cea mai joasă, orice degradare a acestui element constituie o „deteriorare a stării” unui corp de apă de suprafață, în sensul articolului 4 alineatul (1) litera (a) punctul (i) menționat.
 (1) JO C 352, 30.11.2013.


type: contracts

text:
 Avis juridique important
 |
 21999D0708(01)
 Afgørelse truffet af Det Blandede EØS-Udvalg nr. 70/98 af 31. juli 1998 om ændring af bilag II (tekniske forskrifter, standarder, prøvning og certificering) til EØS-aftalen
 EF-Tidende nr. L 172 af 08/07/1999 s. 0049 - 0049
 AFGØRELSE TRUFFET AF DET BLANDEDE EØS-UDVALGNr. 70/98af 31. juli 1998om ændring af bilag II (tekniske forskrifter, standarder, prøvning og certificering) til EØS-aftalenDET BLANDEDE EØS-UDVALG HAR -under henvisning til aftalen om Det Europæiske Økonomiske Samarbejdsområde som tilpasset ved protokollen om tilpasning af aftalen om Det Europæiske Økonomiske Samarbejdsområde, i det følgende benævnt "aftalen", særlig artikel 98, ogud fra følgende betragtninger:Bilag II til aftalen blev ændret ved afgørelse nr. 55/98 truffet af Det Blandede EØS-udvalg den 4. juli 1998(1);Kommissionens direktiv 97/29/EF af 11. juni 1997 om tilpasning til den tekniske udvikling af Rådets direktiv 76/757/EØF vedrørende refleksanordninger på motordrevne køretøjer og påhængskøretøjer dertil(2) bør indarbejdes i aftalen -TRUFFET FØLGENDE AFGØRELSE:Artikel 1Følgende led indsættes i punkt 22 (Rådets direktiv 76/757/EØF) i kapitel I i bilag II til aftalen: "- 397 L 0029: Kommissionens direktiv 97/29/EF af 11. juni 1997 (EFT L 171 af 30.6.1997, s. 11)."Artikel 2Teksterne til direktiv 97/29/EF på islandsk og norsk, som er knyttet til de respektive sproglige udgaver af denne afgørelse, er autentiske.Artikel 3Denne afgørelse træder i kraft den 28. august 1998, forudsat at Det Blandede EØS-udvalg har modtaget alle fornødne meddelelser i henhold til aftalens artikel 103, stk. 1.Artikel 4Denne afgørelse offentliggøres i EØS-afsnittet i og EØS-tillægget til De Europæiske Fællesskabers Tidende.Udfærdiget i Bruxelles, den 31. juli 1998.På Det Blandede EØS-udvalgs vegneN. v. LIECHTENSTEINFormand(1) EFT L 100 af 15.4.1999, s. 38.(2) EFT L 171 af 30.6.1997, s. 11.


text:
ΟΑΕΔ: Αυξήθηκε η ανεργία τον Ιανουάριο – Μεγάλα θύματα οι γυναίκες | e-family.gr | The Lifestyle Portal
 Σε 1.089.989 ανέρχονται οι άνεργοι που είναι εγγεγραμμένοι στα μητρώα του ΟΑΕΔ τον Ιανουάριο του 2017. Ο αριθμός είναι μεγαλύτερος κατά 17.337 συγκριτικά με τον Δεκέμβριο του 2016, με τις γυναίκες να αποτελούν το μεγαλύτερο ποσοστό.
 Συγκεκριμένα, τα στοιχεία που δίνει ο ΟΑΕΔ για τον Ιανουάριο:
 1. Το σύνολο των εγγεγραμμένων ανέργων1, με κριτήριο την αναζήτηση εργασίας (αναζητούντων εργασία), για τον μήνα Ιανουάριο 2017, ανήλθε σε 928.962 άτομα. Από αυτά 500.401 (ποσοστό 53,87%) είναι εγγεγραμμένα στο μητρώο του ΟΑΕΔ για χρονικό διάστημα ίσο ή και περισσότερο των 12 μηνών και 428.561 (ποσοστό 46,13%) είναι εγγεγραμμένα στο μητρώο του ΟΑΕΔ για χρονικό διάστημα μικρότερο των 12 μηνών. Οι άνδρες ανέρχονται σε 356.103 (ποσοστό 38,33%) και οι γυναίκες ανέρχονται σε 572.859 (ποσοστό 61,67%).
 2. Το σύνολο των εγγεγραμμένων λοιπών (μη αναζητούντων εργασία), για τον μήνα Ιανουάριο 2017, ανήλθε σε 161.027 άτομα. Από αυτά 32.028 (ποσοστό 19,89%) είναι εγγεγραμμένα στο μητρώο του ΟΑΕΔ για χρονικό διάστημα ίσο ή και περισσότερο των 12 μηνών και 128.999 (ποσοστό 80,11%) είναι εγγεγραμμένα στο μητρώο του ΟΑΕΔ για χρονικό διάστημα μικρότερο των 12 μηνών. Οι άνδρες ανέρχονται σε 64.288 (ποσοστό 39,92%) και οι γυναίκες σε 96.739 (ποσοστό 60,08%).
 3. Το σύνολο των επιδοτούμενων ανέργων2, για τον μήνα Ιανουάριο 2017 (αφορά τον αριθμό των δικαιούχων που πληρώθηκαν εντός του αντίστοιχου μήνα) ανέρχεται σε 157.015 άτομα, από τα οποία οι 79.624 (ποσοστό 50,71%) είναι κοινοί και λοιπές κατηγορίες επιδοτουμένων και οι 77.391 (ποσοστό 49,29%) είναι εποχικοί τουριστικών επαγγελμάτων. Οι άνδρες ανέρχονται σε 69.271 (ποσοστό 44,12%) και οι γυναίκες σε 87.744 (ποσοστό 55,88%). Από το σύνολο των επιδοτουμένων ανέργων 60.981 (ποσοστό 38,84%) είναι κοινοί, 2.444 (ποσοστό 1,56%) είναι οικοδόμοι, 77.391 (ποσοστό 49,29%) είναι εποχικοί τουριστικών επαγγελμάτων, 15.499 (ποσοστό 9,87%) είναι εποχικοί λοιποί (αγροτικά), 668 (ποσοστό 0,43%) είναι εκπαιδευτικοί, και 32 (ποσοστό 0,02%) είναι λοιποί.
 e-family.gr Ανεργία εγγεγραμμένοι μητρώα ΟΑΕΔ 2017-02-22
 Η επαναγορά χρέους στο επίκεντρο του Eurogroup
 ΟΑΕΔ: «Ανοίγουν» 12.000 θέσεις εργασίας
 Έξω από το υπουργείο Υγείας τα ΑμεΑ


text:
 23.8.2018
 HR
 Službeni list Europske unije
 L 215/17
 ODLUKA ZAJEDNIČKOG ODBORA EGP-a
 br. 226/2016
 od 2. prosinca 2016.
 o izmjeni Priloga II. (Tehnički propisi, norme, ispitivanje i potvrđivanje) Sporazumu o EGP-u [2018/1164]
 ZAJEDNIČKI ODBOR EGP-a,
 uzimajući u obzir Sporazum o Europskom gospodarskom prostoru („Sporazum o EGP-u”), a posebno njegov članak 98.,
 budući da:
 (1)
 Uredba Komisije (EU) 2016/427 оd 10. ožujka 2016. o izmjeni Uredbe (EZ) br. 692/2008 s obzirom na emisije iz lakih osobnih i gospodarskih vozila (Euro 6) (1) treba se uključiti u Sporazum o EGP-u.
 (2)
 Prilog II. Sporazumu o EGP-u trebalo bi stoga na odgovarajući način izmijeniti,
 DONIO JE OVU ODLUKU:
 Članak 1.
 U točki 45.zu (Uredba Komisije (EZ) br. 692/2008) u poglavlju I. Priloga II. Sporazumu o EGP-u dodaje se sljedeća alineja:
 „—
 32016 R 0427: Uredbom Komisije (EU) 2016/427 od 10. ožujka 2016. (SL L 82, 31.3.2016., str. 1.).”
 Članak 2.
 Vjerodostojni su tekstovi Uredbe (EU) 2016/427 na islandskom i norveškom jeziku koji se objavljuju u Dodatku o EGP-u Službenom listu Europske unije.
 Članak 3.
 Ova Odluka stupa na snagu 3. prosinca 2016. pod uvjetom da su sva priopćenja iz članka 103. stavka 1. Sporazuma o EGP-u poslana (*1).
 Članak 4.
 Ova se Odluka objavljuje u odjeljku o EGP-u Službenog lista Europske unije i u Dodatku o EGP-u Službenom listu Europske unije.
 Sastavljeno u Bruxellesu 2. prosinca 2016.
 Za Zajednički odbor EGP-a
 Predsjednica
 Bergdís ELLERTSDÓTTIR
 (1) SL L 82, 31.3.2016., str. 1.
 (*1) Ustavni zahtjevi nisu navedeni.


text:
 4.9.2017
 HU
 Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja
 C 293/6
 A Bíróság (harmadik tanács) 2017. július 13-i ítélete (a Najvyšší súd Slovenskej republiky [Szlovákia] előzetes döntéshozatal iránti kérelme) – Radosław Szoja kontra Sociálna poisťovňa
 (C-89/16. sz. ügy) (1)
 ((Előzetes döntéshozatal - Szociális biztonsági rendszerek alkalmazása - Migráns munkavállalók - Munkavállalói tevékenységet és önálló vállalkozói tevékenységet két különböző tagállamban végző személy - Az alkalmazandó jogszabályok meghatározása - 883/2004/EK rendelet - A 13. cikk (3) bekezdése - 987/2009/EK rendelet - A 14. cikk (5b) bekezdése - 16. cikk - Az igazgatási bizottság határozatainak a szociális biztonsági rendszerek összehangolása tekintetében kifejtett hatásai - Elfogadhatatlanság))
 (2017/C 293/07)
 Az eljárás nyelve: szlovák
 A kérdést előterjesztő bíróság
 Najvyšší súd Slovenskej republiky
 Az alapeljárás felei
 Felperes: Radosław Szoja
 Alperes: Sociálna poisťovňa
 Az eljárásban részt vesz: WEBUNG, s.r.o.
 Rendelkező rész
 A 2012. május 22-i 465/2012/EU európai parlamenti és tanácsi rendelettel módosított, a szociális biztonsági rendszerek koordinálásáról szóló, 2004. április 29-i 883/2004/EK európai parlamenti és tanácsi rendelet 13. cikkének (3) bekezdését akként kell értelmezni, hogy e rendelkezés címén, olyan személy tekintetében alkalmazandó nemzeti jogszabályok meghatározása céljából, mint az alapügy felperese, aki különböző tagállamokban folytat szokásosan munkavállalói tevékenységet és önálló vállalkozói tevékenységet, tekintetbe kell venni a 465/2012 rendelettel módosított, a 883/2004 rendelet végrehajtására vonatkozó eljárás megállapításáról szóló, 2009. szeptember 16-i 987/2009/EK európai parlamenti és tanácsi rendelet 14. cikkének (5b) bekezdésében és 16.cikkében meghatározott követelményeket.
 (1) HL C 175., 2016.5.17.


type: legislation

text:
 3.8.2011
 HU
 Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja
 L 200/6
 A BIZOTTSÁG 763/2011/EU VÉGREHAJTÁSI RENDELETE
 (2011. július 29.)
 egyes áruk Kombinált Nómenklatúra szerinti besorolásáról
 AZ EURÓPAI BIZOTTSÁG,
 tekintettel az Európai Unió működéséről szóló szerződésre,
 tekintettel a vám- és a statisztikai nómenklatúráról, valamint a Közös Vámtarifáról szóló, 1987. július 23-i 2658/87/EGK tanácsi rendeletre (1) és különösen annak 9. cikke (1) bekezdésének a) pontjára,
 mivel:
 (1)
 A 2658/87/EGK rendelet mellékletét képező Kombinált Nómenklatúra egységes alkalmazása érdekében intézkedéseket szükséges elfogadni az e rendelet mellékletében meghatározott áruk besorolásáról.
 (2)
 A 2658/87/EGK rendelet meghatározza a Kombinált Nómenklatúra értelmezésére irányadó általános szabályokat. Ezeket a szabályokat kell alkalmazni bármely más olyan nómenklatúrára vonatkozóan is, amely részben vagy egészben a Kombinált Nómenklatúrán alapul vagy azt bármilyen további albontással kiegészíti, és amelyet az árukereskedelemhez kapcsolódó tarifális és más intézkedések alkalmazása céljából az Unió valamely más rendelkezése hoz létre.
 (3)
 Az említett általános szabályok értelmében a mellékletben szereplő táblázat 1. oszlopában leírt árukat a 3. oszlopban feltüntetett indokok alapján a táblázat 2. oszlopában megjelölt KN-kód alá kell besorolni.
 (4)
 Indokolt úgy rendelkezni, hogy a tagállamok vámhatóságai által kibocsátott, e rendelet rendelkezéseitől eltérő tartalmú, az áruk Kombinált Nómenklatúra szerinti besorolására vonatkozó kötelező érvényű tarifális felvilágosítást a jogosult – a Közösségi Vámkódex létrehozásáról szóló, 1992. október 12-i 2913/92/EGK tanácsi rendelet (2) 12. cikke (6) bekezdésének alkalmazásában – három hónapig továbbra is felhasználhatja.
 (5)
 Az e rendeletben előírt intézkedések összhangban vannak a Vámkódex Bizottság véleményével,
 ELFOGADTA EZT A RENDELETET:
 1. cikk
 A Kombinált Nómenklatúrában a melléklet táblázatának 1. oszlopában leírt árukat a táblázat 2. oszlopában megjelölt KN-kód alá kell besorolni.
 2. cikk
 A tagállamok vámhatóságai által kibocsátott, e rendelet rendelkezéseitől eltérő tartalmú kötelező érvényű tarifális felvilágosítás – a 2913/92/EGK rendelet 12. cikke (6) bekezdésének alkalmazásában – három hónapig továbbra is felhasználható.
 3. cikk
 Ez a rendelet az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapjában való kihirdetését követő huszadik napon lép hatályba.
 Ez a rendelet teljes egészében kötelező és közvetlenül alkalmazandó valamennyi tagállamban.
 Kelt Brüsszelben, 2011. július 29-én.
 a Bizottság részéről, az elnök nevében,
 Algirdas ŠEMETA
 a Bizottság tagja
 (1) HL L 256., 1987.9.7., 1. o.
 (2) HL L 302., 1992.10.19., 1. o.
 MELLÉKLET
 Árumegnevezés
 Besorolás (KN-kód)
 Indokolás
 (1)
 (2)
 (3)
 Különböző típusú szövegfájlok (például PDF, WOL és HTML), képfájlok (például JPEG) és hangfájlok (például MP3) rögzítésére és megjelenítésére/lejátszására alkalmas, hordozható, akkumulátorról működő, megközelítőleg 18 cm x 12 cm x 1 cm méretű, és megközelítőleg 220 g tömegű készülék (úgynevezett „e-könyv”).
 A készülék fel van szerelve az alábbiakkal:
 —
 egy megközelítőleg 12 cm x 9 cm méretű és megközelítőleg 15 cm (6 hüvelyk) képátlójú, 600 x 800 pixel felbontású, 4-szintű szürkeskálás elektronikustinta-technológia alapú monokróm kijelzővel
 —
 egy USB-interfésszel,
 —
 egy fülhallgató-csatlakozóval,
 —
 egy memóriakártya-nyílással,
 —
 vezérlő/szabályozó gombokkal,
 —
 egy 200 MHz-es processzorral, és
 —
 egy 512 MB kapacitású belső memóriával.
 A készülék fájlátvitel céljából automatikus adatfeldolgozó géphez csatlakoztatható.
 A készülék a belső memóriában vagy a memóriakártyán tárolt adatok feldolgozásával képes megjeleníteni/lejátszani a szöveg-, az állókép- és a hangfájlokat.
 A készülék nem rendelkezik fordító, illetve szótárfunkcióval.
 8543 70 90
 A besorolást a Kombinált Nómenklatúra értelmezésére szolgáló 1. és 6. általános szabály, valamint a 8543, a 8543 70 és a 8543 70 90 KN-kód szövegezése határozza meg.
 A készülék automatikus adatfeldolgozó gépként való besorolása a 8471 vtsz. alá kizárt, mivel nem felel meg a 84. árucsoporthoz tartozó megjegyzések 5. A) pontjában foglalt feltételeknek.
 Továbbá, mivel a készülék jellegénél fogva nem kizárólag vagy elsősorban automatikus adatfeldolgozó rendszerben használatos, ilyen rendszerek elemeként a 8471 vtsz. alá történő besorolása szintén kizárt.
 Monitorként a 8528 vtsz. alá való besorolása szintén kizárt, mivel a termék a kijelzője esetében alkalmazott speciális technológia és az ebből következő képminőségromlás miatt képtelen mozgóképek megjelenítésére, és csak dokumentumformátumok és állóképek megjelenítését teszi lehetővé.
 A készüléket a 85. árucsoportban máshol nem meghatározott vagy abban nem szereplő, egyedi funkciójú elektromos készüléknek kell tekinteni.
 Az árucikket következésképpen a 8543 70 90 KN-kód alá kell besorolni.


text:
 17.7.2014
 ET
 Euroopa Liidu Teataja
 L 211/18
 EMP ÜHISKOMITEE OTSUS
 nr 12/2014,
 14. veebruar 2014,
 millega muudetakse EMP lepingu II lisa „Tehnilised normid, standardid, katsetamine ja sertifitseerimine”
 EMP ÜHISKOMITEE,
 võttes arvesse Euroopa Majanduspiirkonna lepingut (edaspidi „EMP leping”), eriti selle artiklit 98,
 ning arvestades järgmist:
 (1)
 EMP lepingusse tuleb inkorporeerida komisjoni 30. oktoobri 2013. aasta määrus (EL) nr 1068/2013, millega muudetakse Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu määruse (EÜ) nr 1333/2008 II lisa seoses difosfaatide (E 450), trifosfaatide (E 451) ja polüfosfaatide (E 452) kasutamisega soolvees säilitatava kala puhul (1).
 (2)
 Käesolevas otsuses käsitletakse toiduainetega seotud õigusakte. Toiduaineid käsitlevaid õigusakte ei kohaldata Liechtensteini suhtes seni, kuni Liechtensteini suhtes kohaldatakse Euroopa Ühenduse ja Šveitsi Konföderatsiooni vahelist põllumajandustoodetega kauplemise kokkulepet, nagu see on sätestatud EMP lepingu II lisa XII peatüki sissejuhatuses. Seetõttu ei kohaldata käesolevat otsust Liechtensteini suhtes.
 (3)
 Seetõttu tuleks EMP lepingu II lisa vastavalt muuta,
 ON VASTU VÕTNUD KÄESOLEVA OTSUSE:
 Artikkel 1
 EMP lepingu II lisa XII peatüki punkti 54zzzzr (Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu määrus (EÜ) nr 1333/2008) lisatakse järgmine taane:
 „—
 32013 R 1068: komisjoni määrus (EL) nr 1068/2013, 30. oktoober 2013 (ELT L 289, 31.10.2013, lk 58).”
 Artikkel 2
 Määruse (EL) nr 1068/2013 islandi- ja norrakeelne tekst, mis avaldatakse Euroopa Liidu Teataja EMP kaasandes, on autentsed.
 Artikkel 3
 Käesolev otsus jõustub 15. veebruaril 2014. aastal, tingimusel et kõik EMP lepingu artikli 103 lõike 1 kohased teated on edastatud (2).
 Artikkel 4
 Käesolev otsus avaldatakse Euroopa Liidu Teataja EMP osas ja EMP kaasandes.
 Brüssel, 14. veebruar 2014
 EMP ühiskomitee nimel
 eesistuja
 Gianluca GRIPPA
 (1) ELT L 289, 31.10.2013, lk 58.
 (2) Põhiseadusest tulenevaid nõudeid ei ole nimetatud.


jurisdiction: US

text:
 198 Md. 424 (1951)
 84 A.2d 419
 HUGHES
 v.
 STATE
 [No. 22, October Term, 1951.]
 Court of Appeals of Maryland.
 Decided November 2, 1951.
 The cause was argued before MARBURY, C.J., and DELAPLAINE, COLLINS, HENDERSON and MARKELL, JJ.
 Edward J. Ryan and Horace P. Whitworth, Jr., for appellant.
 *425 Ambrose T. Hartman, Special Assistant Attorney General, with whom were Hall Hammond, Attorney General, and Paul M. Fletcher, State's Attorney for Allegany County, on the brief, for appellee
 COLLINS, J., delivered the opinion of the Court.
 This is an appeal from a judgment of guilty rendered by the trial court, sitting without a jury, in a trial for manslaughter by automobile as the result of the killing of Thomas Robertson by a truck driven by the appellant.
 Rule 7 (c) of the New Criminal Rules of Practice and Procedure dealing with the trial of criminal cases before the court without a jury provides that when a criminal charge has been so tried by the court, an appeal may be taken as provided by law. Upon appeal the Court of Appeals may review upon both the law and the evidence to determine whether in law the evidence is sufficient to sustain the conviction, but the verdict of the trial court shall not be set aside on the evidence, unless clearly erroneous, and due regard shall be given to the opportunity of the trial judge to judge of the credibility of the witnesses. Therefore, in the review of this case, this Court cannot set aside the verdict of the trial court on the evidence unless clearly erroneous. Lambert v. State, 196 Md. 57, 68, 75 A.2d 327, 332. Edwards v. State, 198 Md. 132, 151, 81 A.2d 631, 639 and opinion filed in the later case on October 5, 1951, on motion for re-argument, 198 Md. 152, 83 A.2d 578.
 The appellant, 24 years of age, was engaged with his father and brother in a business known as The Hughes Coal Company, in digging and mining coal about two miles west of the property of the George's Creek Coal Company in Allegany County. The Hughes Coal Company, non-union, hauled the coal from its mine to the tipple of the George's Creek Coal Company. On May 3rd, 1950, due to labor troubles, pickets of Union Miners were picketing the road leading to the tipple of the George's Creek Company in order to prevent or persuade others not to mine coal. That morning the appellant, *426 driving a truck belonging to the Hughes Coal Company, started for the office of the George's Creek Coal Company for the purpose of getting a check for coal which had been previously sold and delivered to that Company. The truck, a one and a half ton Chevrolet, was in good condition and the brakes operated on the hydraulic principle. The rear wheels were dual pneumatic. As Hughes drove up the road leading toward the office of the George's Creek Coal Company the road was picketed by a number of men. As he approached the place where these pickets were stationed, a representative of the United Mine Workers Union, a Mr. Dolphin, stepped in the road and held up his hand. Hughes did not stop his truck but proceeded in what was called "creeper gear", slower than a walk. Mr. Dolphin asked him "where he was going and if he was going for coal". When the defendant said: "No, I am going to see the superintendent", he was told to go ahead and he proceeded to that office.
 When the appellant arrived at the mine office of the George's Creek Coal Company, a short distance from where the pickets were placed, he went in and obtained his check. When he came out, he found that a board with a number of long nails through it was fastened to the dual rear wheels on the outside and two other nails were imbedded in the same wheel. The tire was almost flat. He took the board off and put it on the floor of his cab for the purpose of taking it home and turning it over to the State Police. He said this did not make him "mad". "I thought it was childish for grown men to pull such a trick." He then started on his return journey home. The road leading from the mine office to the point of the accident sloped gradually upward for about one thousand feet. At the top the road made a curve to the right. After making this right turn the road sloped down at a grade of about 16%. When the appellant started down this hill, he said he shifted to second gear in order to go down the hill without using his brakes. The road then straightened out. In the *427 vicinity of the accident it had a hard surface and was approximately 16 feet in width. To the left of the road in the direction toward which the defendant was driving there was a soft shoulder of four or five feet. To the right of the hard surface there was a parking space in front of a cemetery. Cars were parked on both sides of the road. The deceased was killed while sitting on the fender or standing alongside of an automobile, belonging to Dempsey Nelson, parked parallel to the right side of the road and three or four feet off the hard surface. Appellant said as he approached the scene of the accident going about 15 miles per hour he had his truck under control.
 He first saw the men in the road at a distance of forty or fifty feet. He said there were eight or ten men on the hard surface "milling around". The rest of the men were on the right and left side of the road. He was afraid there was going to be violence and he drove on down the road. He wanted to get through. When he was about thirty feet from the men he saw there was danger of hitting them. At that time he had his truck under control. He said he cut the truck to the right to keep from hitting the men on the left side of the road. He said he kept to the right to avoid the men on the left and when he saw the men on the left were not entirely clear from the road and when he was about thirty feet from them, he put his foot on the brake pedal and something gave away and he lost control of the truck. He kept the front end of the truck away from the cars on the right hand side but the rear wheels of the truck did not follow the line of the front wheels. He later learned that the rear of his truck struck the front of Dempsey Nelson's car, on which Thomas Robertson was sitting, and at the same time struck Mr. Robertson with the rear panel or post of the truck, causing his death. The spring of the truck broke and the drive shaft fell down digging holes in the road. He said when he applied the brakes the line that carries the hydraulic brake fluid to the rear wheels broke. He said: "When I *428 applied the brakes, I heard a noise, the truck gave a hop like up and down and then I heard it hit the other car." When the brakes were applied the truck did not stop but "hopped" up in the air. He tried to keep it on the road. He said: "Well, it struck the car, but I did not know it. I did not realize there was one there. The men were standing in front of the car and I could not see the car." He said he proceeded sixty or seventy feet before the truck stopped. He then noticed that the drive shaft was down and the right wheel was out of line.
 The appellant got out of his truck, not knowing what had happened and had in his hands the board, with the nails in it, and complained to the men about placing the board with the nails under his wheels. He then learned of the injury to Mr. Robertson which later resulted in his death. Then he proceeded to a neighbor's house and the police were called.
 Testimony was offered by the State that when Hughes came around the turn at the top of the hill, he accelerated the speed of the truck. All of the testimony in the case, except that of the appellant, was that the road was clear as appellant came down the hill and there was nothing to prevent the truck from traveling straight down the road.
 Witnesses testified that Robertson was standing or sitting near or on the fender of Dempsey's automobile parked three or four feet from the right side of and parallel to the hard surfaced road. John Dolphin testified that the truck "came around the curve and then I could see it, he started down the hill he had slowed up and started down and made a cut in toward us. I hollered `Look out'. I rolled off the car I was sitting on and while I was off the car I saw Robertson's hands go up in the air and he was rolled between the truck and the car. Dempsey Nelson testified that the appellant "swung off the road in the wide place and hit my car and those guys." "He just cut it off the road." John Kirk testified that after the defendant speeded *429 the truck up "it seemed like he cut to turn wide on the left and then he went to the right and hit these fellows." He was about four feet off the road when he hit the men. Alexander Barclay testified that he was further up the hill than Robertson. He said that he was three or four feet off the side of the road and the appellant tramped on the accelerator and the engine made such a terrific noise he turned his head. "The truck was coming so fast I just had time to move and was missed by inches when I jumped." He testified that the marks of the truck showed that the truck left the hard surfaced road about thirty or forty feet before it hit Robertson. He said the truck came right into the men and almost hit them all and on the way out it was going too fast to get out "that is when he clipped the car and when he hit it the springs flew in the road and the drive shaft fell on the road from the impact and it was digging the road all the way down." Melvin Cuthbertson testified that there was no obstruction in the road at the time and he was about three or four feet off the road. As soon as the defendant made the turn he turned the truck right into a "bunch of us men standing along that car, he turned the front end in. It all happened so quick when I did see him keep on coming the rest of us men got out of the way. I went forward and ran into a man in front of me and I threw up my hand in front of my face. I think I ran into Robertson." William Cameron testified "he came down pretty strong, he seemed to cut out pretty strong to the right off the middle of the road to where the cars were at." Lewis Reiber testified "when he got to the top of the curve coming around he speeded up and I saw him turn the wheel into where the parked automobiles were and the men standing there and there was nothing the matter with the truck at that time until he hit." Other testimony was presented by the State.
 The testimony and marks in the road showed that the drive shaft did not drop down until after the Nelson car was struck. The front end of the truck cleared the *430 men and Nelson's automobile. However, the rear of the truck collided with the front of the automobile near which or on which which Robertson was sitting, killing Robertson and injuring Cuthbertson. Nelson's car was pushed back from the road eight or ten feet. The truck continued on down the road for a distance of about 120 feet after the accident. The drive shaft gouging in the road finally stopped it.
 There is no testimony except that of the appellant himself that the road was obstructed in any way by the men "milling around". Other witnesses said that the men were all off the road. Appellant admits the road was straight. There is no testimony except that of the appellant that there was anything mechanically wrong with the truck just before the accident. After the accident when appellant was interviewed by the State's Attorney, he made no mention at all about anything being mechanically wrong with the truck before the accident. At the trial he explained this by saying that he was not asked that question.
 The trial court found that there was no credible evidence to support the contention that there was some mechanical failure of the truck which caused the brakes to fail altogether. They found "much evidence to the contrary". The court found that this statement of the appellant did "not agree too well with what Hughes had said shortly after the accident when he was being questioned at the office of the State's Attorney. Nor is this borne out by the track his truck followed." The court found that "the failure of the motive power was after the rear end of the truck struck the Nelson car." The court further said: "We believe that Hughes was not apprehensive of mob violence as he went out, nor was he `amused' over the spiked board incident. He was certainly angry. The average man in Hughes' place would have been. * * * We further conclude that, as he came down the hill, he turned the truck to the right intending only to scare the pickets grouped around the cars near the cemetery gate, by swerving near them *431 as he proceeded down the road in second gear. Unfortunately, he went too close and struck the two men and the Nelson car, not with the front of his truck, but with the right rear end. * * * In finding Hughes guilty of manslaughter, we want to make it clear it was not simply that he was angered because his legal rights had been violated. There were good grounds for his feeling of resentment. But this did not justify him in doing what he did with a dangerous instrumentality, and swerving a truck toward men on the side of the road."
 Manslaughter by automobile is defined by Article 27, Section 436A, 1947 Supplement of the Code, as follows: "Every person causing the death of another as the result of the driving, operation or control of an automobile, motor vehicle, * * * or other vehicle, in a grossly negligent manner, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor to be known as `manslaughter by automobile' * * *."
 In the case of Neusbaum v. State, 156 Md. 149, 155, 143 A. 872, 875, Judge Offutt defined involuntary manslaughter as the taking of a life "unintentionally while needlessly doing anything in its nature dangerous to life, or who causes death by neglecting a duty imposed either by law or by contract, or in the course of committing a crime or even a civil wrong." The indictment in the case now before this Court follows the words of the statute, Article 27, Section 436A, supra, above quoted, and charged the killing "in a grossly negligent manner". It is said in Volume 8, Maryland Law Review, at page 51, footnote 14: "The common law standard of `gross negligence' as the minimum requirement for conviction of manslaughter when one unintentionally kills in the course of doing a dangerous act is carried over into the recent Maryland statute setting up the separate crime of manslaughter by automobile or other vehicle, Md. Code Supp. (1943) Art. 27, Sec. 436A."
 The cases of State of Maryland v. Paul V. Chapman, 101 F. Supp. 335, Daily Record, June 14, 1951, involved indictments for manslaughter for deaths in Prince George's County caused by the operation of an aircraft. *432 Judge Chesnut, in the United States District Court to which the cases had been removed for trial, after reviewing Article 27, Section 436A, supra, the common law, and the Maryland authorities, said in those cases: "In a succinct and well prepared brief counsel for the State has aptly expressed the matter in saying that the question is whether the conduct of the defendant, considering all the factors of the case, was such that it amounted to a `wanton or reckless disregard for human life'." This seems to be the test to be applied under the manslaughter statute, supra.
 In the case before this Court we cannot say under the evidence the trial court was clearly wrong in finding that the road was unobstructed and that the appellant, not by reason of any mechanical defect, swerved the truck toward the men on the side of the road in wanton and reckless disregard of human life. The judgment will therefore be affirmed.
 Judgment affirmed, with costs.


text:
C 101/32 DA Den Europæiske Unions Tidende 26.4.2003
 RETTEN I FØRSTE INSTANS
 DOM AFSAGT AF RETTEN I FØRSTE INSTANS A. Renck, mod Kontoret for Harmonisering i det Indre Marked
 (Varemærker og Design) (KHIM) (befuldmægtigede: A. von
 den 6. februar 2003 Mühlendahl, B. Weggenmann og C. Røhl Søberg), intervenient
 for Retten var Karlsberg Brauerei KG Weber, Homburg (Tysk-
 i sag T-7/01, Norman Pyres mod Kommissionen for De land), ved avocat R. Lange, angående en påstand om annulla-
 Europæiske Fællesskaber (1) tion af en afgørelse truffet den 12. februar 2001 af Tredje
 Appelkammer ved Kontoret for Harmonisering i det Indre
 Marked (Varemærker og Design) (sag R 251/2000-3) vedrøren-
 (Midlertidigt ansat — forlængelse af kontrakt — varighed) de registrering af tegnet MYSTERY som EF-varemærke, over
 for hvilket der er blevet gjort indsigelse gældende på grundlag
 (2003/C 101/56) af det nationale varemærke Mixery, har Retten (Anden Afde-
 ling), sammensat af afdelingsformanden, R.M. Moura Ramos,
 (Processprog: engelsk) og dommerne J. Pirrung og A.W.H. Meij; justitssekretær:
 fuldmægtig D. Christensen, den 15. januar 2003 afsagt dom,
 hvis konklusion lyder således:
 I sag T-7/01, Norman Pyres, forhenværende tjenestemand ved
 Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber, med bopæl i 1) Kontoret for Harmonisering i det Indre Marked (Varemærker
 Bruxelles, ved avocats G. Vandersanden og L. Levi, og med og Design) frifindes.
 valgt adresse i Luxembourg, mod Kommissionen for De
 Europæiske Fællesskaber (befuldmægtiget: J. Currall), angående 2) Hver part bærer sine egne omkostninger.
 en påstand om annullation af Kommissionens afgørelse om at
 forlænge sagsøgerens kontrakt som midlertidigt ansat for en
 periode begrænset til seks måneder, har Retten (enedommer: (1 ) EFT C 227 af 11.8.2001.
 P. Mengozzi); justitssekretær: fuldmægtig J. Plingers, den
 6. februar 2003 afsagt dom, hvis konklusion lyder således:
 1) Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber frifindes.
 2) Hver part bærer sine omkostninger.
 RETTENS DOM
 ( 1) EFT C 95 af 24.3.2001.
 af 13. februar 2003
 i sag T-333/01, Karl L. Meyer mod Kommissionen for De
 Europæiske Fællesskaber (1)
 DOM AFSAGT AF RETTEN I FØRSTE INSTANS
 (»OLT — erstatningssøgsmål — forpligtelse til offentliggø-
 den 15. januar 2003 relse og til kontrol — årsagsforbindelse«)
 i sag T-99/01, Mystery drinks GmbH mod Kontoret
 (2003/C 101/58)
 for Harmonisering i det Indre Marked (Varemærker og
 Design) ( 1)
 (Processprog: fransk)
 [EF-varemærker — indsigelsessag — ældre nationalt vare-
 mærke Mixery — ansøgning om EF-figurvaremærket MY-
 STERY — relativ registreringshindring — forvekslingsrisiko
 — artikel 8, stk. 1, litra b), i forordning nr. 40/94] I sag T-333/01, Karl L. Meyer, Uturoa (Fransk Polynesien), ved
 avocat J.-D. des Arcis, og med valgt adresse i Luxembourg,
 (2003/C 101/57) mod Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber (befuld-
 mægtigede: M.-J. Jonczy og B. Martenczuk), angående en
 påstand om erstatning for det tab, sagsøgeren hævder at have
 (Processprog: tysk) lidt som følge af de tjenstlige fejl, Kommissionen hævdes at
 have begået i forbindelse med anvendelsen af afgørelserne om
 de oversøiske landes og territoriers associering, har Retten
 I sag T-99/01, Mystery drinks GmbH, Eppertshausen (Tysk- (Tredje Afdeling), sammensat af afdelingsformanden, K. Le-
 land), ved advokaterne T. Jestaedt, V. von Bomhard og naerts, og dommerne J. Azizi og M. Jaeger; justitssekretær:


text:
14. 1 . 75 Gazzetta ufficiale delle Comunità europee N. L 9/21
 ACCORDO
 tra la Comunità economica europea e la Repubblica dell' India relativo alla
 fornitura di latte scremato in polvere a titolo di aiuto alimentare
 IL CONSIGLIO DELLE COMUNITÀ EUROPEE,
 da una parte,
 IL GOVERNO DELLA REPUBBLICA DELL' INDIA,
 dall'altra,
 HANNO DECISO di concludere il presente accordo e hanno a tal fine designato come
 plenipotenziari :
 IL CONSIGLIO DELLE COMUNITÀ EUROPEE :
 IL GOVERNO DELLA REPUBBLICA DELL' INDIA :
 I QUALI HANNO CONVENUTO LE DISPOSIZIONI CHE SEGUONO :
 Articolo I Articolo IV
 La Comunità economica europea, in seguito denomi Il paese destinatario s' impegna ad usare a fini di
 nata « Comunità », fornisce a titolo di dono alla Repub consumo i prodotti ricevuti a titolo di aiuto e ad appli
 blica dell' India, in seguito denominata « paese destina care, per la vendita di tali prodotti sul proprio
 tario »,' un quantitativo di 2 750 tonnellate di latte scre mercato, i prezzi normalmente ivi praticati per i
 mato in polvere la cui qualità e condizioni di imbal prodotti di qualità comparabile .
 laggio sono definite nell'allegato I che costituisce Il ricavo di tale vendita valutato in modo forfettario di
 parte integrante del presente accordo .
 comune accordo tra la Comunità e il paese destina
 tario, e iscritto come entrata nel bilancio del governo
 Articolo II centrale di questo paese ed e destinato al finanzia
 mento di progetti di sviluppo che verranno presentati
 Le consegne sono effettuate secondo le modalità dal paese destinatario e non solleveranno obiezioni da
 previste all'allegato II che costituisce parte integrante parte della Comunità .
 del presente accordo .
 Articolo V
 Articolo III Le parti contraenti s' impegnano ad eseguire il
 presente accordo in modo che nessun pregiudizio sia
 Il paese destinatario s' impegna a prendere tutte le recato alla struttura normale della produzione nazio
 disposizioni necessarie per il trasporto e l'assicura nale e del commercio internazionale . A questo scopo,
 zione dei prodotti dal luogo di consegna ai luoghi di esse prendono le misure necessarie per assicurare che
 destinazione . le forniture a titolo di aiuto si aggiungano , e non si
 sostituiscano, alle operazioni commerciali che sarebbe
 Esso s'impegna a porre la massima cura nell'assicurate lecito prevedere se tali forniture non avessero luogo .
 che l'aggiudicazione del trasporto marittimo non rechi
 pregiudizio al libero gioco di un'equa concorrenza . I Articolo VI
 problemi che potrebbero sorgere al riguardo forme
 ranno oggetto di consultazioni ai sensi dell'articolo Il paese destinatario prende tutte le misure opportune
 VIII . per impedire :
 ---pagebreak--- N. L 9/22 Gazzetta ufficiale delle Comunità europee 14. 1 . 75
 — la riesportazione dei prodotti ricevuti a titolo di venduti, modo di commercializzazione, prezzi di
 aiuto, nonché dei prodotti da esso derivati ; vendita praticati ; spese normali di commercializza
 — l'esportazione commerciale e non commerciale, zione sul mercato del paese destinatario ; spese di
 durante i primi 6 mesi dopo l'ultima consegna, sia assicurazione, ed eventualmente spese di trasporto,
 dei prodotti ottenuti localmente ed aventi la stessa dal porto di sbarco fino ai luoghi di destinazione ;
 natura di quelli ricevuti a titolo di aiuto, sia dei 3 . il 15 gennaio di ogni anno, sino a completa realizza
 prodotti da esso derivati . zione dei progetti di sviluppo : stadio di realizza
 zione del progetto o dei progetti con indicazione
 Articolo VII del finanziamento totale effettuato a tale stadio .
 Il paese destinatario s'impegna ad informare la
 comunità delle modalità di esecuzione del presente Articolo Vili
 accordo . A tal fine esso comunica alla Commissione
 delle Comunità europee i seguenti dati : Su richiesta di una di lorp, le parti contraenti si consul
 1 . immediatamente dopo le operazioni di scarico di tano su tutti i problemi riguardanti l'applicazione del
 ogni quantitativo : porto e data di arrivo della nave ; presente accordo.
 natura, quantità e osservazioni eventuali sulla
 qualità dei prodotti scaricati ; data in cui le opera Articolo IX
 zioni di scarico sono state terminate ; relative spese
 di trasporto marittimo e di assicurazione ; Il presente accordo è redatto in duplice esemplare in
 2. ogni tre mesi sino all'utilizzazione completa dei lingua danese, francese, inglese, italiana, olandese e
 quantitativi ricevuti a titolo di aiuto : quantitativi tedesca , ciascun testo facente fede .
 ---pagebreak--- 14 . 1 . 75 Gazzetta ufficiale delle Comunità europee N. L 9/23
 ALLEGATO I
 LATTE SCREMATO IN POLVERE
 QUALITA E CONDIZIONI DI IMBALLAGGIO
 I. Requisiti di qualità
 a) Tenore di materie grasse : al massimo 1,5 % .
 b) Tenore d'acqua : al massimo 4,0 % .
 c) Acidità totale espressa in acido lattico : al massimo 0,15% ( 18° Dornic).
 d) Ricerca dei neutralizzanti : negativo.
 e) Additivi autorizzati : nessuno .
 f) Prova della fosfatasi : negativo .
 g) Solubilità : al massimo 0,5 mi (al minimo 99 % ).
 h) Grado di purezza : al minimo disco B ( 15,0 mg).
 i) Tenore di germi : al massimo 50 000 per g.
 k) Titolo di colibacilli : negativo in 0,1 g.
 1) Sapore e odore : genuino .
 m ) Aspetto : colore bianco o leggermente giallastro, assenza
 di impurità e di particelle colorate .
 II . Condizioni di imballaggio
 a) Contenuto del peso netto di 25 chilogrammi .
 b) Confezione :
 aa) 4 sacchi di carta « Kraft », di resistenza corrispondente a un peso di almeno 70 g per m - ;
 1 sacco di carta catramata interposta, di resistenza corrispondente a un peso di( almeno 140
 g per m - ;
 1 tasca interna di polietilene di almeno 0,06 nini di spessore, saldata o a doppia legatura ;
 oppure
 bb) 1 sacco di carta « clupak-poly-duplo », di resistenza corrispondente a un peso di almeno
 50/ 20/ 50 g per m 2 ;
 2 sacchi di carta « Kraft », di resistenza corrispondente a un peso di almeno 70/ 7 5 g per
 m- ;
 1 tasca interna di polietilene di almeno 0,10 mm di spessore , saldata o a doppia legatura ;
 oppure
 cc) 1 sacco di carta « Kraft », di resistenza corrispondente ad almeno 70 g per ni -1 ;
 1 sacco di carta « Kraft » con strato di polietilene , di resistenza corrispondente ad almeno
 80 g + 1 5 g per ni -' ;
 3 sacchi di carta « Kraft », di resistenza corrispondente ad almeno 70 g per m : ;
 1 tasca interna di polietilene di almeno 0,06 mm di spessore , saldata o a doppia legatura ,
 c) iscrizione sull'imballaggio (in lingua inglese) :
 SKIMMED-MILK POWDER — GIFT OF THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC COMMUNITY
 TO THE REPUBLIC OF INDIA
 ---pagebreak--- N. L 9 /24 Gazzetta ufficiale delle Comunità europee 14 . . 75
 ALLEGATO II
 MODALITÀ DI CONSEGNA
 CAPITOLO I Articolo 5
 Se la Comunità non è in grado di fornire tutta la merce o
 Disposizioni generali eventualmente parte di essa alla data e nei termini previsti
 all'articolo 6, i mandatari della Comunità e del paese destina
 tario possono, fatto salvo l'articolo 4, fissare di comune
 Articolo 1 accordo una nuova data ed un nuovo termine di consegna .
 La consegna è effettuata ed i rischi passano dalla Comunità
 al paese destinatario nel momento in cui la merce è deposi
 CAPITOLO III
 tata al punto di esportazione designato dalla Commissione
 delle Comunità europee, nel luogo indicato dal paese destina
 tario o dal suo mandatario di cui all'articolo 2, alle condi
 zioni di cui al presente allegato. Salvò gli articoli 7 e 8 , le Obblighi del paese destinatario
 spese sono sostenute dalla Comunità fino alla consegna della
 merce e dal paese destinatario dal momento della consegna Articolo 6
 in poi .
 Dopo aver preso contatto con la Comunità, il paese destina
 Articolo 2 tario mette a disposizione per il trasporto della merce una o
 più navi di stazza adeguata alle normali possibilità del porto
 d'imbarco. Dette navi devono essere pronte a caricare ad una
 Per l'esecuzione delle disposizioni del presente allegato la data che rientri nel periodo di cui all'articolo 3 .
 Comunità designa — eventualmente per ogni lotto — un
 mandatario di cui comunica immediatamente nome ed indi
 Il mandatario del paese destinatario comunica alla Comunità
 rizzo al paese destinatario . Il paese destinatario designa per
 ciascun porto d'imbarco un mandatario di cui comunica alla non appena ne viene a conoscenza , possibilmente 20 giorni
 Comunità sollecitamente, possibilmente prima della designa
 prima e in ogni caso almeno 10 giorni liberi prima dell'i
 zione del mandatario di quest'ultima, nome e indirizzo. nizio della consegna, la data di cui sopra e quella di inizio
 della consegna .
 Articolo 3 Egli fissa , con il mandatario della Comunità , il ritmo di
 consegna .
 Prima dell'inizio delle procedure di designazione del manda
 tario della Comunità di cui all'articolo 2, la Commissione Articolo 7
 delle Comunità europee e il paese destinatario fissano di
 comune accordo il periodo durante il quale dovrà iniziarsi la Se il paese destinatario non è in grado d'iniziare il carico alla
 consegna . data prevista all'articolo 6, primo comma, il mandatario del
 paese destinatario ne informa senza indugio il mandatario
 della Comunità .
 CAPITOLO II
 In tal caso, i mandatari della Comunità e del paese destina
 tario possono fissare di comune accordo, una nuova data per
 l' inizio della consegna ed eventualmente un nuovo ritmo di
 Obblighi della Comunità consegna . Le spese dovute a detto ritardo sono comunque a
 carico del paese destinatario, salvo casi di forza maggiore .
 A nico lo 4 Se la nuova data è posteriore di oltre 30 giorni liberi alla data
 d'imbarco prevista all'articolo 6, primo comma, la Comunità
 Se la Comunità non e in grado di iniziare la consegna alla può disporre della merce fatto salvo l'impegno previsto all'ar
 data ed eventualmente al ritmo previsti all'articolo 6, sono a ticolo I dell'accordo .
 suo carico le possibili spese che ne risultano per il paese
 destinatario, per esempio le controstallie, il nolo « vuoto per
 pieno • ed il nolo a vuoto . Articolo S
 I tassi e le modalità di controstallia fissati nei contratti tra il Se il quantitativo previsto per essere caricato su una nave non
 paese destinatario e il vettori.' devono essere stati preventiva può essere portato a bordo nella sua totalità, il paese destina
 mente pattuiti tra il paese destinatario e il mandatario della tario informa la Comunità al più presto possibile , al massimo
 Comunità . entro I 5 giorni liberi dalla fine del carico, se intende accet
 tare il saldo o rinunciarvi .
 Le altre spese di cui al primo comma sono rimborsate dalla
 Comunità solo se sono state pagate dal paese destinatario con Nel primo caso l'articolo 7, secondo e terzo comma , è appli
 il suo accordo . cabile a tale salilo, se non ne è ancora avvenuta la consegna .
 ---pagebreak--- 14. 1 . 75 Gazzetta ufficiale delle Comunità europee N. L 9/25
 Nella seconda ipotesi, la Comunità può ritenere di avere Articolo 9
 assolto nei confronti del paese destinatario l'impegno di cui
 all'articolo I dell'accordo, assumendo l'onere delle spese deri Alla consegna della merce, il paese destinatario rilascia al
 mandatario della Comunità un certificato di avvenuta
 vanti da questa rinuncia.
 consegna su cui sono indicati il porto d'imbarco, la data
 Scaduto il termine dei 15 giorni liberi ed in assenza di comu dell'avvenuta consegna, la natura, la quantità della merce
 nicazioni da parte del paese destinatario, si considera presa in consegna con eventuali osservazioni sulla qualità di
 comunque avvenuta la rinuncia . detta merce .
 Informazione relativa alla firma dell'accordo per la fornitura di aiuto alimentare
 tra la Comunità economica europea e la Repubblica dell'India
 L'accordo tra la Comunità economica europea e la Repubblica dell' India relativo alla
 fornitura di latte scremato in polvere a titolo di aiuto alimentare, che il Consiglio ha
 deciso di concludere il 21 ottobre 1974 è stato firmato a Bruxelles il 24 ottobre 1974 :
 a nome del Consiglio delle Comunità europee dal sig. Étienne Burin des Roziers,
 ambasciatore straordinario e plenipotenziario, presidente del comitato dei rappresentanti
 permanenti , nonché dal sig. Hans-Broder Krohn , direttore generale dello sviluppo e della
 cooperazione della Commissione delle Comunità europee ;
 a nome del governo della Repubblica dell' India dal sig. Krishen Behari Lall, ambasciatore
 straordinario e plenipotenziario, capo della missione di questo paese presso la Comunità
 economica europea .


text:
 4.4.2022
 GA
 Iris Oifigiúil an Aontais Eorpaigh
 C 148/4
 Breithiúnas na Cúirte (an Tríú Dlísheomra) an 10 Feabhra 2022 (iarraidh ar réamhrialú ón Oberster Gerichtshof – an Ostair) OE v VY
 (Cás C-522/20) (1)
 (Tarchur chun réamhrialú - Bailíocht - Comhar breithiúnach in ábhair shibhialta - Dlínse iarratais ar cholscaradh a éisteacht agus a chinneadh - Airteagal 18 CFAE - Rialachán (AE) Uimh. 2201/2003 - Cúigiú agus séu fleasc d’Airteagal 3(1)(a) - Difríocht idir fhad na riachtanais maidir le tréimhse chónaithe ar mhaithe le cinneadh a dhéanamh ar cé acu a bhfuil dlínse acu - Difríocht idir cónaitheoir ar náisiúnach de chuid Ballstát na cúirte arna tugadh an t-iarratas ós a comhair é agus cónaitheoir nach náisiúnach den Bhallstát sin é - Easpa idirdhealú de bhíthin náisiúntachta)
 (2022/C 148/07)
 Teanga an cháis: an Ghearmáinis
 An chúirt a rinne an tarchur
 Oberster Gerichtshof
 Páirtithe sna príomhimeachtaí
 Iarratasóir: OE
 Cosantóir: VY
 An chuid oibríochtúil den bhreithiúnas
 Caithfidh prionsabal an neamh-idirdhealaithe de bhíthin náisiúntachta, a chumhdaítear in Airteagal 18 CFAE, a léiriú sa chaoi nach gcuireann sé cosc ar chás ina chuirtear dlínse chúirteanna an Bhallstáit atá sa chríocha ina bhfuil gnáthchónaí an iarratasóir lonnaithe, dá bhforáiltear sa séu eangaí d’Airteagal 3(1)(a) de Rialachán (CE) Uimh. 2201/2003 an 27 Samhain 2003 maidir le dlínse agus le haithint agus forghníomhú breithiúnas in ábhair maidir le pósadh agus le freagracht tuismitheora, lena n-aisghairtear Rialachán (CE) Uimh. 1347/2000, faoi réir an iarratasóir a bheith ina chónaitheoir nó ina cónaitheoir ar feadh íostréimhse díreach roimh an t-iarratas a dhéanamh atá sé mhí níos giorra ná an tréimhse dá bhforáiltear sa chúigiú fleasc d’Airteagal 3(1)(a) den rialachán sin de bhíthin gur náisiúnach den Bhallstát sin é nó í an duine atá i dtrácht.
 (1) IO C 35 an 01.02.2021


text:
 4.5.2010
 ET
 Euroopa Liidu Teataja
 L 111/31
 EL-UKRAINA KOOSTÖÖNÕUKOGU SOOVITUS nr 1/2009,
 23. november 2009,
 EL-Ukraina assotsieerimiskava rakendamise kohta
 (2010/255/EÜ)
 EL-UKRAINA KOOSTÖÖNÕUKOGU,
 võttes arvesse partnerlus- ja koostöölepingut, millega luuakse partnerlus Euroopa ühenduste ja nende liikmesriikide ning Ukraina vahel (edaspidi „leping”), eriti selle artiklit 85,
 ning arvestades järgmist:
 (1)
 Lepingu artikkel 85 annab koostöönõukogule õiguse anda kahe lepinguosalise kokkuleppel asjakohaseid soovitusi.
 (2)
 Lepingu artikli 102 kohaselt kasutavad lepinguosalised mis tahes üld- või erimeetmeid täitmaks lepingukohaseid kohustusi ning tagavad, et lepingus sätestatud eesmärgid saavutatakse.
 (3)
 Lepinguosalised peavad praegu läbirääkimisi assotsieerimislepingu sõlmimiseks, mis hõlmab laiaulatuslikku ja terviklikku vabakaubandusala.
 (4)
 Lepinguosalised on EL-Ukraina assotsieerimiskava teksti kokku leppinud.
 (5)
 EL-Ukraina assotsieerimiskava asendab praeguse EL-Ukraina tegevuskava, valmistab ette uue EL-Ukraina assotsieerimislepingu ja aitab kaasa selle aegsale rakendamisele, sest selles on ühiselt kindlaks määratud konkreetsed meetmed, mis annavad praktilisi suuniseid lepingu ettevalmistamiseks ja rakendamiseks.
 (6)
 Assotsieerimiskaval on kaks eesmärki: määrata kindlaks konkreetsed meetmed assotsieerimislepingu ettevalmistamiseks ja luua laiem põhi üldeesmärgile saavutada Ukraina ja Euroopa Liidu poliitiline ühtsus ja suurem majanduslik integratsioon.
 (7)
 Assotsieerimiskava on töödokument, mida vajaduse korral täiendatakse selle punktis 3.9 osutatud eduaruannete alusel ning selle üldeesmärkide saavutamiseks,
 ON VASTU VÕTNUD KÄESOLEVA SOOVITUSE:
 Ainus artikkel
 Koostöönõukogu soovitab lepinguosalistel rakendada dokumendis UE-UA 1056/2/09 REV 2 esitatud EL-Ukraina assotsieerimiskava, niivõrd kui rakendamine on suunatud uue EL-Ukraina assotsieerimislepingu ettevalmistamisele ja rakendamisele.
 Brüssel, 23. november 2009
 Koostöönõukogu nimel
 ELi delegatsiooni juht
 C. BILDT
 Ukraina delegatsiooni juht
 J. TÕMOŠENKO


text:
 25.4.2014
 SL
 Uradni list Evropske unije
 L 124/22
 IZVEDBENA UREDBA KOMISIJE (EU) št. 419/2014
 z dne 24. aprila 2014
 o določitvi standardnih uvoznih vrednosti za določitev uvozne cene za nekatere vrste sadja in zelenjave
 EVROPSKA KOMISIJA JE –
 ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije,
 ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1234/2007 z dne 22. oktobra 2007 o vzpostavitvi skupne ureditve kmetijskih trgov in o posebnih določbah za nekatere kmetijske proizvode (Uredba o enotni SUT) (1),
 ob upoštevanju Izvedbene uredbe Komisije (EU) št. 543/2011 z dne 7. junija 2011 o določitvi podrobnih pravil za uporabo Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1234/2007 za sektorja sadja in zelenjave ter predelanega sadja in zelenjave (2) ter zlasti člena 136(1) Uredbe,
 ob upoštevanju naslednjega:
 (1)
 Izvedbena uredba (EU) št. 543/2011 na podlagi izida večstranskih trgovinskih pogajanj urugvajskega kroga določa merila, po katerih Komisija določi standardne vrednosti za uvoz iz tretjih držav za proizvode in obdobja iz dela A Priloge XVI k tej uredbi.
 (2)
 Standardna uvozna vrednost se izračuna vsak delovni dan v skladu s členom 136(1) Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 543/2011 ob upoštevanju spremenljivih dnevnih podatkov. Zato bi morala ta uredba začeti veljati na dan objave v Uradnem listu Evropske unije –
 SPREJELA NASLEDNJO UREDBO:
 Člen 1
 Standardne uvozne vrednosti iz člena 136 Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 543/2011 so določene v Prilogi k tej uredbi.
 Člen 2
 Ta uredba začne veljati na dan objave v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
 Ta uredba je v celoti zavezujoča in se neposredno uporablja v vseh državah članicah.
 V Bruslju, 24. aprila 2014
 Za Komisijo
 V imenu predsednika
 Jerzy PLEWA
 Generalni direktor za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja
 (1) UL L 299, 16.11.2007, str. 1.
 (2) UL L 157, 15.6.2011, str. 1.
 PRILOGA
 Standardne uvozne vrednosti za določitev uvozne cene za nekatere vrste sadja in zelenjave
 (EUR/100 kg)
 Oznaka KN
 Oznaka tretje države (1)
 Standardna uvozna vrednost
 0702 00 00
 MA
 55,5
 MK
 105,0
 TR
 90,2
 ZZ
 83,6
 0707 00 05
 AL
 65,0
 MA
 39,8
 MK
 59,4
 TR
 124,2
 ZZ
 72,1
 0709 93 10
 MA
 29,9
 TR
 94,6
 ZZ
 62,3
 0805 10 20
 EG
 43,4
 IL
 68,2
 MA
 53,7
 TN
 59,3
 TR
 48,0
 ZZ
 54,5
 0805 50 10
 MA
 35,6
 TR
 80,6
 ZZ
 58,1
 0808 10 80
 AR
 106,8
 BR
 88,9
 CL
 102,9
 CN
 96,9
 MK
 21,6
 NZ
 139,9
 US
 196,2
 ZA
 130,1
 ZZ
 110,4
 0808 30 90
 AR
 94,7
 CL
 146,6
 ZA
 108,1
 ZZ
 116,5
 (1) Nomenklatura držav, določena v Uredbi Komisije (ES) št. 1833/2006 (UL L 354, 14.12.2006, str. 19). Oznaka „ZZ“ predstavlja „druga porekla“.