text:
 25.9.2010
 BG
 Официален вестник на Европейския съюз
 C 260/22
 Жалба, подадена на 26 юли 2010 г. — Three-N-Products Private/СХВП — Shah (AYUURI NATURAL)
 (Дело T-313/10)
 ()
 2010/C 260/30
 Език на жалбата: английски
 Страни
 Жалбоподател: Three-N-Products Private Ltd (Ню Делхи, Индия) (представител: C. Jäger, lawyer)
 Ответник: Служба за хармонизация във вътрешния пазар (марки, дизайни и модели)
 Друга страна в производството пред апелативния състав: Mr S Shah, Mr A Shah, Mr M Shah — A Partnership t/a FUDCO (Уембли, Обединено кралство)
 Искания на жалбоподателя
 —
 да се отмени решението на четвърти апелативен състав на Службата за хармонизация във вътрешния пазар (марки, дизайни и модели) от 1 юни 2010 г. по преписка R 1005/2009-4;
 —
 да се осъди ответника да потвърди решението на отдела по споровете на Службата за хармонизация във вътрешния пазар (марки, дизайни и модели) от 2 юли 2009 г. и да отхвърли изцяло заявка за регистрация на марка на Общността No 5 805 387;
 —
 да се осъди ответника да заплати съдебните разноски;
 —
 да се осъди другата страна в производството пред апелативния състав, в случай че встъпи в настоящото производството, да заплати съдебните разноски, включително разноските, направени от жалбоподателя в производството пред апелативния състав и пред отдела по споровете.
 Правни основания и основни доводи
 Заявител на марката на Общността: другата страна в производството пред апелативния състав.
 Марка на Общността, предмет на спора: словна марка „AYUURI NATURAL“, за стоки от класове 3 и 5.
 Притежател на марката или знака, на която/който е направено позоваване в подкрепа на възражението: жалбоподателят.
 Марка или знак, на която/който е направено позоваване в подкрепа на възражението: регистрация на марка на Общността No 2996098 на фигуративната марка „Ayur“, по-специално за стоки от класове 3 и 5; регистрация на марка на Общността No 5429469 на словната марка „AYUR“ по-специално за стоки от класове 3 и 5.
 Решение на отдела по споровете: уважава възражението и отхвърля изцяло заявката.
 Решение на апелативния състав: уважава жалбата, отменя оспорваното решение и отхвърля възражението.
 Изложени правни основания: жалбоподателят посочва две правни основания в подкрепа на жалбата си.
 С първото правно основание жалбоподателят изтъква, че оспорваното решение нарушава членове 7 и 8 от Регламент на Съвета No 207/2009, тъй като апелативният състав погрешно приема, че не съществува вероятност от объркване и че по-рано регистрираните марки имат насочващо допълнително значение по отношение на съответните стоки, което намалява отличителния характер на по-рано регистрираните марки.
 С второто си правно основание жалбоподателят посочва, че оспорваното решение нарушава член 65, параграф 2 от Регламент на Съвета No 207/2009, защото с постановяването на оспорваното решение апелативният състав злоупотребява с правомощията си, тъй като решението не е обективно и е без правно основание.


type: legislation

jurisdiction: EU

text:
 9.6.2016
 HU
 Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja
 L 152/3
 A BIZOTTSÁG (EU) 2016/896 VÉGREHAJTÁSI RENDELETE
 (2016. június 8.)
 a vas-nátrium-tartarátok valamennyi állatfaj takarmány-adalékanyagaként történő engedélyezéséről
 (EGT-vonatkozású szöveg)
 AZ EURÓPAI BIZOTTSÁG,
 tekintettel az Európai Unió működéséről szóló szerződésre,
 tekintettel a takarmányozási célra felhasznált adalékanyagokról szóló, 2003. szeptember 22-i 1831/2003/EK európai parlamenti és tanácsi rendeletre (1) és különösen annak 9. cikke (2) bekezdésére,
 mivel:
 (1)
 Az 1831/2003/EK rendelet rendelkezik az adalékanyagok takarmányokban történő felhasználásának engedélyezéséről, az engedély megadásának feltételeiről és az engedélyezési eljárásokról.
 (2)
 A Bizottsághoz az 1831/2003/EK rendelet 7. cikkének megfelelően kérelmet nyújtottak be a vas-nátrium-tartarátok engedélyezésére vonatkozóan. A kérelemhez csatolták az 1831/2003/EK rendelet 7. cikkének (3) bekezdésében előírt adatokat és dokumentumokat.
 (3)
 A szóban forgó kérelem a „technológiai adalékanyagok” adalékanyag-kategóriába sorolandó vas-nátrium-tartarátok valamennyi állatfaj takarmány-adalékanyagaként való engedélyezésére vonatkozik.
 (4)
 Az Európai Élelmiszerbiztonsági Hatóság (a továbbiakban: Hatóság) 2015. április 30-i véleményében (2) megállapította, hogy a szóban forgó készítmény a javasolt felhasználási feltételek mellett nincs káros hatással sem az állati és emberi egészségre, sem a környezetre. A Hatóság ezenfelül arra a következtetésre jutott, hogy a készítmény hatékony lehet sóban csomósodásgátló anyagként. A Hatóság úgy ítélte meg, hogy nem szükséges a forgalomba hozatalt követő egyedi nyomonkövetési előírásokat elrendelni. A Hatóság ellenőrizte továbbá az 1831/2003/EK rendelettel létrehozott referencialaboratórium által benyújtott, a takarmányban található takarmány-adalékanyagra vonatkozó analitikai módszerekről szóló jelentést is.
 (5)
 A vas-nátrium-tartarátok értékelése azt mutatja, hogy az 1831/2003/EK rendelet 5. cikkében előírt engedélyezési feltételek teljesülnek. Ennek megfelelően a szóban forgó készítmény felhasználását az e rendelet mellékletében meghatározottak szerinti engedélyezni kell.
 (6)
 Az e rendeletben előírt intézkedések összhangban vannak a Növények, Állatok, Élelmiszerek és Takarmányok Állandó Bizottságának véleményével,
 ELFOGADTA EZT A RENDELETET:
 1. cikk
 A mellékletben meghatározott, a „technológiai adalékanyagok” adalékanyag-kategóriába és a „csomósodásgátló anyagok” funkcionális csoportba tartozó készítmény takarmány-adalékanyagként történő használata a mellékletben meghatározott feltételek mellett engedélyezett.
 2. cikk
 Ez a rendelet az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapjában való kihirdetését követő huszadik napon lép hatályba.
 Ez a rendelet teljes egészében kötelező és közvetlenül alkalmazandó valamennyi tagállamban.
 Kelt Brüsszelben, 2016. június 8-án.
 a Bizottság részéről
 az elnök
 Jean-Claude JUNCKER
 (1) HL L 268., 2003.10.18., 29. o.
 (2) EFSA Journal (2015); 13(5):4114.
 MELLÉKLET
 Az adalékanyag azonosító száma
 Adalékanyag
 Összetétel, kémiai képlet, leírás, analitikai módszer
 Állatfaj vagy -kategória
 Maximális életkor
 Legkisebb tartalom
 Legnagyobb tartalom
 Egyéb rendelkezések
 Az engedély lejárta
 A NaCl hatóanyag-tartalma mg/kg-ban
 Technológiai adalékanyagok: Csomósodásgátló anyagok
 1i534
 Vas-nátrium-tartarátok
 Az adalékanyag összetétele:
 A készítményben a vas(III)-klorid nátrium-tartarátokkal képződött komplexeinek vizes oldata ≤ 35 % (tömegszázalékban)
 A hatóanyag jellemzése:
 D(+)-2,3-dihidroxi-butándisavval, L(-)-2,3-dihidroxi-butándisavval és mezo-2,3-dihidroxi-butándisavval képződött vas(III)-komplex
 A vas és a mezo-tartarát aránya 1:1;
 A vas és az összes tartarátizomer aránya 1:1,5;
 CAS-szám: 1280193-05-9
 Fe(OH)2C4H4O6Na
 Klorid: ≤ 25 %
 Oxalátok: ≤ 1,5 % oxálsavban kifejezve
 Vas: ≥ 8 % Iron(III)
 Analitikai módszer
 (1)
 A takarmány-adalékanyag mezo-tartarát-, valamint D(-)- és L(+)-tartarát-tartalmának meghatározása:
 —
 nagy teljesítményű folyadék-kromatográfia törésmutatóval (HPLC-RI),
 A takarmány-adalékanyag teljes vastartalmának meghatározása:
 —
 Az EN 15510 szabványnak megfelelő induktív csatolású plazma atomemissziós spektroszkópia (ICP-AES), vagy
 —
 Az EN 15621 szabványnak megfelelő induktív csatolású plazma atomemissziós spektroszkópia (ICP-AES) nyomás alatt végzett roncsolást követően, vagy
 —
 Az EN ISO 11885 szabványnak megfelelő induktív csatolású plazma atomemissziós spektroszkópia (ICP-AES), vagy
 —
 Az EN ISO 6869 szabványnak megfelelő atomabszorpciós spektrometria (AAS), vagy
 —
 A 152/2009/EK (2) bizottsági rendeletnek megfelelő atomabszorpciós spektrometria (AAS), és
 A takarmány-adalékanyag teljes nátriumtartalmának meghatározása:
 —
 Az EN 15510 szabványnak megfelelő induktív csatolású plazma atomemissziós spektroszkópia (ICP-AES), vagy
 —
 Az EN 15621 szabványnak megfelelő induktív csatolású plazma atomemissziós spektroszkópia (ICP-AES) nyomás alatt végzett roncsolást követően, vagy
 —
 Az EN ISO 11885 szabványnak megfelelő induktív csatolású plazma atomemissziós spektroszkópia (ICP-AES), vagy
 —
 Az EN ISO 6869 szabványnak megfelelő atomabszorpciós spektrometria (AAS), és
 A takarmány-adalékanyag teljes kloridtartalmának meghatározása:
 —
 A 152/2009/EK bizottsági rendeletnek vagy az ISO 6495 szabványnak megfelelő titrimetria.
 Minden állatfaj
 —
 —
 —
 1.
 Az adalékanyag csak NaCl-ban (nátrium-kloridban) használható.
 2.
 Legkisebb ajánlott adag: 26 mg vas-nátrium-tartarát/1 kg NaCl (ez 3 mg vas/1 kg NaCl-nak felel meg)
 3.
 Legnagyobb ajánlott adag: 106 mg vas-nátrium-tartarát/1 kg NaCl
 2026. június 29.
 (1) Az analitikai módszerek részletes leírása a referencialaboratórium honlapján található: https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en/eurl/feed-additives/evaluation-reports
 (2) A Bizottság 152/2009/EK rendelete (2009. január 27.) a takarmányok hatósági ellenőrzése során alkalmazott mintavételi és vizsgálati módszerek megállapításáról (HL L 54., 2009.2.26., 1. o.).


type: contracts

text:
 Fontos jogi nyilatkozat
 |
 21995A0426(15)
 Hivatalos Lap L 094 , 26/04/1995 o. 0285 - 0305 Hivatalos Lap L 094 , 26/04/1995 o. 0285 - 0305
 Agreementin the form of an exchange of letters between the European Community and Mongolia amending the Agreement between the European Economic Community and Mongolia on trade in textile products to take into account the expected accession of the Republic of Austria, the Republic of Finland and the Kingdom of Sweden to the European UnionLetter from the Council of the European UnionSir,1. I have the honour to refer to the Agreement between the European Economic Community and Mongolia on trade in textile products initialled on 22 January 1993.2. In order to take into account the expected accession of the Republic of Austria, the Republic of Finland and the Kingdom of Sweden to the European Union on 1 January 1995, the European Community considers that the following amendments should be made to the Agreement between the European Economic Community and Mongolia on trade in textile products:2.1. The following text is added after Article 8, paragraph 2:"For the purposes of applying the provisions of paragraph 2 in the year 1995, the preceding year's total imports from all third countries shall be calculated on the basis of imports into the Community as constituted on 31 December 1994 and of imports into Austria, Finland and Sweden. Trade between the Community, Austria, Finland and Sweden, or between Austria, Finland and Sweden shall be excluded from this total."2.2. Figures in Annex II which set out the quantitative limits for exports from Mongolia to the European Union are to be replaced by limits for the enlarged Community as set out in Appendix I to this letter.2.3. Article 14, paragraph 2, subparagraph 2, second indent of Protocol A, Title IV should be amended as follows:- AT = AustriaBL = BeneluxDE = Federal Republic of GermanyDK = DenmarkEL = GreeceES = SpainFI = FinlandFR = FranceGB = United KingdomIE = IrelandIT = ItalyPT = PortugalSE = Sweden"2.4. The Annex to Protocol A setting out the model of the certificate of origin is replaced by Appendix II to this letter.2.5. The Annex to Protocol A setting out the model of the export licence is replaced by Appendix III to this letter.2.6. The Annex to Protocol B setting out the model of the certificate applicable to certain cottage industry and folklore products is replaced by Appendix IV to this letter.2.7. Figures in the Annex to Protocol C which set out the quantitative limits for economic outward processing operations are to be replaced by limits for the enlarged Community as set out in Appendix V to this letter.2.8. Should one or more acceding countries not join the European Union the adjustments calculated for this or these countries shall be deducted from the "Adjusted limits 1995, 1996 and 1997" set out in Appendices I and V to this letter and the respective amendments mentioned under point 2.3 shall not enter into force.2.9. Notwithstanding the modifications referred to under points 2.4, 2.5 and 2.6, during a transitional period that will end on 30 June 1995, the competent authorities of Mongolia shall be authorized to continue issuing the forms that were in use in 1994.2.10. Should inaccuracies appear in the trade figures used to establish the adjustments contained in Appendices I and V, technical revisions of these adjustments will be made following consultations and provided that the request for consultations is made not later than 28 February 1995.3. I should be obliged if you could kindly confirm the acceptance of your Government of the foregoing. Should this be the case, this Agreement in the form of an exchange of letters shall enter into force on the first day of the month following the day on which the Parties have notified each other that the legal procedures necessary to this end have been completed. In the meantime, it shall be applied provisionally from 1 January 1995 on the conditions to be specified in an exchange of notes (see Appendix VI).Please accept, Sir, the assurance of my highest consideration.For the Councilof the European UnionAppendix IANNEX IICOMMUNITY QUANTITATIVE LIMITSGroup | Category | Unit | Existing limit 1995 | Growth rate | Adjustment for | Adjusted limit 1995 | Adjusted limit 1996 | Adjusted limit 1997 |Sweden | Finland | Austria |IB | 5 | 1000 pieces | 811 | 4,00 % | 106 | 47 | 87 | 1052 | 1094 | 1137 |IB | 5a | 1000 pieces | 113 | 4,00 % | 1 | 0 | 1 | 115 | 120 | 125 |+++++ TIFF ++++++++++ TIFF ++++++++++ TIFF +++++Appendix VANNEX TO PROTOCOL COUTWARD PROCESSING TRAFFICCommunity quantitative limitsGroup | Category | Unit | Existing limit 1995 | Growth rate | Adjustment for | Adjusted limit 1995 | Adjusted limit 1996 | Adjusted limit 1997 |Sweden | Finland | Austria |IB | 5 | 1000 pieces | 169 | 6,00 % | 5 | 2 | 4 | 180 | 191 | 202 |Appendix VIExchange of notesThe Directorate-General for External Economic Relations of the Commission of the European Communities presents its compliments to the Mission of Mongolia to the European Communities and has the honour to refer to the Agreement on trade in textile products between Mongolia and the European Economic Community initialled on 22 January 1993, as amended by the exchange of letters initialled on (date of initialling).The Directorate-General wishes to inform the Mission of Mongolia that whilst awaiting the completion of the necessary procedures for the conclusion and coming into force of the amended Agreement, the European Community is prepared to allow the provisions of the Agreement to apply de facto from 1 January 1995. This is on the understanding that either Party may at any time terminate this de facto application of the amended Agreement provided that one hundred and twenty days notice is given.The Directorate-General for External Economic Relations would be grateful if the Mission of Mongolia would confirm its agreement to the foregoing.The Directorate-General for External Economic Relations of the Commission of the European Communities avails itself of this opportunity to renew to the Mission of Mongolia to the European Communities the assurance of its highest consideration.The Mission of Mongolia to the European Communities presents its compliments to the Directorate-General for External Economic Relations of the Commission of the European Communities and has the honour to refer to the note of the Directorate-General of (date of note verbale) regarding the Agreement on trade in textile products between Mongolia and the European Economic Community initialled on 22 January 1993, as amended by the exchange of letters initialled on (date of initialling).The Mission of Mongolia wishes to confirm to the Directorate-General that whilst awaiting the completion of the necessary procedures for the conclusion and coming into force of the adapted Agreement, the Government of Mongolia is prepared to allow the provisions of the Agreement to apply de facto from 1 January 1995. This is on the understanding that either Party may at any time terminate this de facto application of the adapted Agreement provided that one hundred and twenty days notice is given.The Mission of Mongolia to the European Communities avails itself of this opportunity to renew to the Directorate-General for External Economic Relations of the Commission of the European Communities the assurance of its highest consideration.Letter from the Government of MongoliaSir,I have the honour to acknowledge receipt of your letter of ... which reads as follows:"Sir,1. I have the honour to refer to the Agreement between the European Economic Community and Mongolia on trade in textile products initialled on 22 January 1993.2. In order to take into account the expected accession of the Republic of Austria, the Republic of Finland and the Kingdom of Sweden to the European Union on 1 January 1995, the European Community considers that the following amendments should be made to the Agreement between the European Economic Community and Mongolia on trade in textile products:2.1. The following text is added after Article 8, paragraph 2:"For the purposes of applying the provisions of paragraph 2 in the year 1995, the preceding year's total imports from all third countries shall be calculated on the basis of imports into the Community as constituted on 31 December 1994 and of imports into Austria, Finland and Sweden. Trade between the Community, Austria, Finland and Sweden, or between Austria, Finland and Sweden shall be excluded from this total."2.2. Figures in Annex II which set out the quantitative limits for exports from Mongolia to the European Union are to be replaced by limits for the enlarged Community as set out in Appendix I to this letter.2.3. Article 14, paragraph 2, subparagraph 2, second indent of Protocol A, Title IV should be amended as follows:- AT = AustriaBL = BeneluxDE = Federal Republic of GermanyDK = DenmarkEL = GreeceES = SpainFI = FinlandFR = FranceGB = United KingdomIE = IrelandIT = ItalyPT = PortugalSE = Sweden"2.4. The Annex to Protocol A setting out the model of the certificate of origin is replaced by Appendix II to this letter.2.5. The Annex to Protocol A setting out the model of the export licence is replaced by Appendix III to this letter.2.6. The Annex to Protocol B setting out the model of the certificate applicable to certain cottage industry and folklore products is replaced by Appendix IV to this letter.2.7. Figures in the Annex to Protocol C which set out the quantitative limits for economic outward processing operations are to be replaced by limits for the enlarged Community as set out in Appendix V to this letter.2.8. Should one or more acceding countries not join the European Union the adjustments calculated for this or these countries shall be deducted from the "Adjusted limits 1995, 1996 and 1997" set out in Appendices I and V to this letter and the respective amendments mentioned under point 2.3 shall not enter into force.2.9. Notwithstanding the modifications referred to under points 2.4, 2.5 and 2.6, during a transitional period that will end on 30 June 1995, the competent authorities of Mongolia shall be authorized to continue issuing the forms that were in use in 1994.2.10. Should inaccuracies appear in the trade figures used to establish the adjustments contained in Appendices I and V, technical revisions of these adjustments will be made following consultations and provided that the request for consultations is made not later than 28 February 1995.3. I should be obliged if you could kindly confirm the acceptance of your Government of the foregoing. Should this be the case, this Agreement in the form of an exchange of letters shall enter into force on the first day of the month following the day on which the Parties have notified each other that the legal procedures necessary to this end have been completed. In the meantime, it shall be applied provisionally from 1 January 1995 on the conditions to be specified in an exchange of notes (see Appendix VI).Please accept, Sir, the assurance of my highest consideration."I have the honour to confirm that my Government is in agreement with the contents of your letter.Please accept, Sir, the assurance of my highest consideration.For the Governmentof MongoliaAppendix IANNEX IICOMMUNITY QUANTITATIVE LIMITSGroup | Category | Unit | Existing limit 1995 | Growth rate | Adjustment for | Adjusted limit 1995 | Adjusted limit 1996 | Adjusted limit 1997 |Sweden | Finland | Austria |IB | 5 | 1000 pieces | 811 | 4,00 % | 106 | 47 | 87 | 1052 | 1094 | 1137 |IB | 5a | 1000 pieces | 113 | 4,00 % | 1 | 0 | 1 | 115 | 120 | 125 |Appendix IIANNEX TO PROTOCOL A, ARTICLE 2 (1)+++++ TIFF +++++Appendix IIIANNEX TO PROTOCOL A, ARTICLE 7 (1)+++++ TIFF ++++++++++ TIFF +++++Appendix VANNEX TO PROTOCOL COUTWARD PROCESSING TRAFFICCommunity quantitative limitsGroup | Category | Unit | Existing limit 1995 | Growth rate | Adjustment for | Adjusted limit 1995 | Adjusted limit 1996 | Adjusted limit 1997 |Sweden | Finland | Austria |IB | 5 | 1000 pieces | 169 | 6,00 % | 5 | 2 | 4 | 180 | 191 | 202 |--------------------------------------------------


type: caselaw

text:
 1.10.2011
 MT
 Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali tal-Unjoni Ewropea
 C 290/19
 Appell ippreżentat fil-11 ta’ Awwissu 2011 mill-Uffiċċju Ewropew tal-Pulizija (Europol) kontra s-sentenza tat-Tribunal għas-Servizz Pubbliku tas-26 ta’ Mejju 2011 fil-Kawża F-83/09 — Kalmár vs Europol
 (Kawża T-455/11 P)
 2011/C 290/27
 Lingwa tal-kawża: l-Olandiż
 Partijiet
 Appellant: Uffiċċju Ewropew tal-Pulizija (Europol) (rappreżentanti: D. Neumann, D. El Khoury u J. Arnould, aġenti, assistiti minn D. Waelbroeck u E. Antypas)
 Appellat: Andreas Kalmár (Den Haag, Il-Pajjiżi l-Baxxi)
 Talbiet
 L-appellant jitlob li l-Qorti Ġenerali jogħġobha:
 —
 tannulla s-sentenza appellata u tiddeċiedi l-mertu sa fejn it-Tribunal għas-Servizz Pubbliku
 (a)
 annulla d-deċiżjoni tal-4 ta’ Frar 2009 li permezz tagħha d-Direttur tal-Uffiċċju Ewropew tal-Pulizija (Europol) xolja l-kuntratt għal żmien determinat ta’ A. Kalmár, id-deċiżjoni tal-24 ta’ Frar 2009 li permezz tagħha d-Direttur tal-Uffiċċju Ewropew tal-Pulizija llibera lill-parti kkonċernata mill-obbligu li taħdem iż-żmien ta’ preavviż u kif ukoll id-deċiżjoni tat-18 ta’ Lulju 2009 li ċaħdet l-ilment tal-parti kkonċernata;
 (b)
 kkundanna lill-Uffiċċju Ewropew tal-Pulizija għall-ħlas tad-danni sostnuti minn A. Kalmár fl-ammont ta’ EUR 5 000; u
 (ċ)
 kkundanna lill-Uffiċċju Ewropew tal-Pulizija għall-ispejjeż tiegħu stess u kif ukoll għal dawk sostenuti minn A. Kalmár;
 —
 tikkundanna lill-appellat għall-ispejjeż kollha tal-kawża kemm dawk sostnuti fl-ewwel istanza u kif ukoll dawk sostnuti fl-appell.
 Aggravji u argumenti prinċipali
 Insostenn tal-appell tiegħu, l-appellant jinvoka sitt aggravji.
 (1)
 L-ewwel aggravju, ibbażat fuq il-ksur tal-obbligu li ma jiddeċidix ultra petita u fuq il-ksur tad-drittijiet tad-difiża. Skont l-appellant, it-Tribunal għas-Servizz Pubbliku wettaq l-eżami tiegħu fuq il-bażi ta’ allegazzjonijiet li huma differenti minn dawk imressqa mill-appellat.
 (2)
 It-tieni aggravju, ibbażat fuq opinjoni legali żbaljata fl-evalwazzjoni tal-leġittimità tad-deċiżjonijiet ikkontestati. It-Tribunal għas-Servizz Pubbliku applika b’mod żbaljat, b’mod partikolari, l-obbligu ta’ viġilanza u l-obbligu ta’ motivazzjoni.
 (3)
 It-tielet aggravju, ibbażat fuq opinjoni legali żbaljata tat-Tribunal għas-Servizz Pubbliku dwar is-suġġett tat-talba intiża għall-annullament. Skont l-appellant, it-Tribunal għas-Servizz Pubbliku kellu jikklassifika d-deċiżjoni tat-18 ta’ Lulju 2009 bħala deċiżjoni li tista’ tiġi kkontestata u li hija wkoll suġġetta għall-istħarriġ ġudizzjarju.
 (4)
 Ir-raba’ aggravju, ibbażat fuq diversi żbalji fis-sentenza tat-Tribunal għas-Servizz Pubbliku dwar il-punt li l-Uffiċċju Ewropew tal-Pulizija “bl-ebda mod” ma ħa inkunsiderazzjoni l-“fatti rilevanti u li ma jistgħux jiġu injorati” fid-deċiżjoni li l-parti kkonċernata tiġi lliberata mill-obbligu tal-preavviż jew għamel dan “mingħajr l-attenzjoni meħtieġa”.
 (5)
 Il-ħames aggravju, ibbażat fuq il-motivazzjoni insuffiċjenti tas-sentenza appellata.
 (6)
 Is-sitt aggravju, ibbażat fuq il-konstatazzjoni żbaljata ta’ kumpens għad-danni.