type: caselaw

text:
 31.7.2010
 MT
 Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali tal-Unjoni Ewropea
 C 209/47
 Rikors ippreżentat fl-24 ta’ Mejju 2010 — Il-Polonja vs Il-Kummissjoni
 (Kawża T-241/10)
 ()
 2010/C 209/71
 Lingwa tal-kawża: il-Pollakk
 Partijiet
 Rikorrenti: Ir-Repubblika tal-Polonja (rappreżentant: M. Szpunar, aġent)
 Konvenuta: Il-Kummissjoni Ewropea
 Talbiet tar-rikorrenti
 —
 li tiġi annullanta d-Deċiżjoni tal-Kummissjoni 2010/152/UE, tal-11 ta’ Marzu 2010 [innotifikata taħt in-Numru C(2010) 1317], li teskludi mill-finanzjament tal-Unjoni Ewropea ċertu nfiq imġarrab mill-Istati Membri taħt it-Taqsima ta’ Garanzija tal-Fond Agrikolu Ewropew dwar Gwida u Garanzija (FAEGG), taħt il-Fond Agrikolu Ewropew ta’ Garanzija (FAEG) u taħt il-Fond Agrikolu Ewropew għall-Iżvilupp Rurali (FAEŻR) (1), sa fejn hija teskludi mill-finanzjament Komunitarju l-ammonti ta’ PLN 279 794 442,15 u EUR 25 583 996,81 mogħtija mill-istituzzjoni ta’ ħlas awtorizzata fir-Repubblika tal-Polonja.
 —
 tikkundanna lill-Kummissjoni għall-ispejjeż.
 Motivi u argumenti prinċipali
 Id-deċiżjoni kkontestata tipprovdi għal korrezzjoni finanzjarja minħabba żbalji fis-sistema ta’ identifikazzjoni u kontroll ta’ pakketti tal-art fis-snin 2005 u 2006 li tikkonsisti f’sistema tal-pakketti tal-art mhux vettorizzata għal kollox, aċċettazzjoni ta’ art ineliġibbli għall-ħlasijiet, numru baxx wisq ta’ verifiki fuq il-post f’reġjuni b’rati għolja ta’ żball (Województwo opolskie) u applikazzjoni żbaljata tad-dispożizzjonijiet dwar in-nonkonformità intenzjonali.
 Ir-rikorrenti tikkontesta l-eżistenza tal-iżbalji allegati u ssostni, fir-rigward tad-deċiżjoni kkontestata, il-motivi li ġejjin.
 Fl-ewwel lok, hija tallega l-ksur tal-ewwel paragrafu tal-Artikolu 7(4) tar-Regolament (KE) Nru 1258/1999 (2) u tal-Artikolu 31(1) tar-Regolament (KE) Nru 1290/2005 (3), kif ukoll tal-linji gwida fid-dokument VI/216/93, minħabba li saret korrezzjoni finanzjarja abbażi ta’ verifika żbaljata tal-fatti u abbażi ta’ interpretazzjoni żbaljata, minkejja li l-awtoritajiet Pollakki wettqu l-ħlasijiet b’mod konformi mad-dispożizzjonijiet tal-Unjoni Ewropea.
 L-ebda wieħed mill-iżbalji allegati, ir-raġuni għall-korrezzjoni finanzjarja, ma twettaq fil-fatt u l-infiq li d-Deċiżjoni teskludi mill-finanzjament mill-Unjoni Ewropea sar b’mod konformi mad-dispożizzjonijiet tal-Unjoni Ewropea.
 Is-sistema ta’ identifikazzjoni ta’ pakketti ta’ art agrikola applikata fil-Polonja fl-2005 u fl-2006 issodisfat b’mod sħiħ ir-rekwiżiti tal-Artikolu 20 tar-Regolament (KE) Nru 1782/2003 (4) u tal-Artikolu 6 tar-Regolament (KE) Nru 796/2004 (5); f’diversi aspetti hija marret ħafna lil hinn minn dawn ir-rekwiżiti u ggarantixxiet ħarsien rigoruż tal-interessi ekonomiċi tal-Unjoni Ewropea.
 Il-proċeduri nazzjonali applikati fl-2005 u fl-2006 ippermettew il-verifika b’mod effikaċi u oġġettiva jekk rikorrent ikunx indika b’mod intenzjonali jew le daqs ikbar tas-superfiċje li għaliha ntalab il-ħlas, u f’każ ta’ dubju kienu jipprovdu għal deċiżjoni ġudizzjarja u għall-ħarsien tal-prinċipju tal-innoċenza.
 Ir-rikonoxximent tas-superfiċje għal ħlas saret b’mod konformi mar-rekwiżiti neċessarji sabiex ikun hemm id-dritt għal għajnuna għas-superfiċje, fid-dawl tal-fatt li, skont l-Att ta’ Adeżjoni, il-kundizzjoni hija li s-superfiċje tkun inżammet f’kundizzjoni agrikola tajba (KAT) fit-30 ta’ Ġunju 2003, filwaqt li ż-żamma tas-superfiċje f’kundizzjoni agrikola u ambjentali tajba (KAAT) fid-data tal-kontroll mhijiex rekwiżit sabiex l-imsemmija superfiċje tkun tista’ tibbenefika minn għajnuna, iżda minflok hija kundizzjoni li jekk ma tiġix sodisfatta twassal għal tnaqqis fl-ammont li jitħallas.
 In-numru ta’ kontrolli fuq il-post li ġew ikkompletati fl-2005 f’Województwo opolskie ssodisfaw ir-rekwiżiti tal-Artikolu 26 tar-Regolament (KE) Nru 796/2004.
 Fit-tieni lok, ir-rikorrenti tallega ksur tar-raba’ paragrafu tal-Artikolu 7(4) tar-Regolament (KE) Nru 1258/1999 u tal-Artikolu 31(2) tar-Regolament (KE) Nru 1290/2005, tal-linji gwida stabbiliti fid-dokument VI/5330/97, kif ukoll tal-prinċipju ta’ proporzjonalità, fid-dawl tal-fatt li l-korrezzjoni hija maqbuża b’mod estrem jekk jitqabbel ir-riskju ta’ telf għall-baġit tal-Unjoni Ewropea.
 Anki kieku s-sistema ta’ kontroll u ta’ sanzjoni stabbilita mill-awtoritajiet Pollakki tinkludi ċerti żbalji, u dan mhuwiex il-każ, l-imsemmija żbalji huma tant insinjifikattivi li r-riskju ta’ telf għall-baġit tal-Unjoni jirreferi għal ammont ħafna inqas mill-korrezzjoni li l-Kummissjoni għamlet fid-deċiżjoni kkontestata. Dan huwa l-każ, b’mod partikolari, fir-rigward tal-ammont tal-korrezzjoni li saret mill-Kummissjoni, għaliex allegatament is-sistema ta’ identifikazzjoni u kontroll ta’ pakketti ta’ art agrikola ma ġietx vettorizzata għal kollox u fl-2005 ma sarux biżżejjed kontrolli fuq il-post f’Województwo opolskie.
 (1) ĠU L 63, p. 7.
 (2) Regolament tal-Kunsill (KE) Nru 1258/1999, tas-17 ta’ Mejju 1999, dwar il-finanzjament tal-politika komuni agrikola (Edizzjoni Speċjali bil-Malti, Kapitolu 3, Vol. 25, p. 414).
 (3) Regolament tal-Kunsill (KE) Nru 1290/2005, tal-21 ta’ Ġunju 2005, dwar il-finanzjament tal-politika agrikola komuni ( 209, p. 1).
 (4) Regolament tal-Kunsill (KE) Nru 1782/2003, tad-29 ta’ Settembru 2003, li jistabbilixxi regoli komuni għal skemi diretti ta’ appoġġ fi ħdan il-politika agrikola komuni u li jistabbilixxi ċerti skemi ta’ appoġġ għall-bdiewa u li jemenda r-Regolamenti (KEE) Nru 2019/93, (KE) Nru 1452/2001, (KE) Nru 1453/2001, (KE) Nru 1454/2001, (KE) Nru 1868/94, (KE) Nru 1251/1999, (KE) Nru 1254/1999, (KE) Nru 1673/2000, (KE) Nru 2358/71 u (KE) Nru 2529/2001 (Edizzjoni Speċjali bil-Malti, Kapitolu 3, Vol. 40, p. 269).
 (5) Regolament tal-Kummissjoni (KE) Nru 796/2004, tal-21 ta’ April 2004, li jippreskrivi regoli dettaljati għall-implimentazzjoni ta’ konformità, modulazzjoni u amministrazzjoni integrata u sistema ta’ kontroll kif hemm provvediment dwarhom fir-Regolament tal-Kunsill (KE) Nru 1782/2003 li jistabbilixi regoli komuni għal skemi ta’ sostenn dirett taħt il-politika agrikola komuni u li jistabbilixxi ċerti skemi ta’ sostenn għall-bdiewa (Edizzjoni Speċjali bil-Malti, Kapitolu 3, Vol. 44, p. 243).


type: legislation

jurisdiction: EU

text:
 |
 52011PC0599
 Togra le haghaidh RIALACHÁIN Ó PHARLAIMINT NA hEORPA AGUS ÓN gCOMHAIRLE lena gcuirtear chun feidhme clásal cosanta déthaobhach agus meicníocht cobhsaíochta um bananaí an Chomhaontaithe lena mbunaítear Comhlachas idir an tAontas Eorpach agus a Bhallstáit ar thaobh amháin agus Meiriceá Láir ar an taobh eile /* COIM/2011/0599 leagan deireanach - 2011/0263 (COD) */
 MEABHRÁN MÍNIÚCHÁIN
 1. COMHTHÉACS AN TOGRA
 Forais agus cuspóirí an togra
 Baineann an togra seo leis an gclásal cosanta
 agus an Mheicníocht Cobhsaíochta dá bhforáiltear sa Chomhaontú Comhlachais le
 Meiriceá Láir a ionchorprú i ndlí an Aontais Eorpaigh.
 Comhthéacs ginearálta
 Ar an 23 Aibreán 2007 thug an
 Chomhairle údarás don Choimisiún caibidlíochtaí a thosú le tíortha áirithe
 Mheiriceá Láir, caibidlíochtaí as ar tháinig Comhaontú Comhlachais le Meiriceá
 Láir. Cuireadh inisealacha leis an gComhaontú an 22 Márta 2011.
 Áirítear clásal cosanta déthaobhach sa
 Chomhaontú lena ndéantar foráil maidir leis an bhféidearthacht an ráta custaim
 NBF (náisiún barrfhabhair) a ath-fhorchur má thagann allmhairí isteach, de
 thoradh léirscaoileadh trádála, i gcainníochtaí a bhfuil méadú den sórt orthu
 agus faoi choinníollacha den sórt a dhéanfadh mórdhíobháil (nó a bheadh ina
 mbagairt mórdhíobhála) do thionscal an Aontais trí tháirge cosúil nó táirge
 dír-iomaíoch a chruthú.
 Ina theannta sin, ionchorpraítear sa
 chomhaontú freisin Meicníocht Cobhsaíochta um Bananaí ar féidir dá réir, go dtí
 1 Eanáir 2020, dleachtanna custaim fabhracha a fhionraí nuair a
 shroichtear méid bliantúil áirithe allmhairí.
 Chun go bhfeidhmeodh na bearta sin, ba cheart
 an clásal cosanta agus an Mheicníocht Cobhsaíochta a ionchorprú i ndlí an
 Aontais Eorpaigh, agus ní foláir gnéithe nós imeachta a gcur i bhfeidhm chomh
 maith le cearta na bpáirtithe leasmhara a shonrú.
 2. TORTHAÍ NA gCOMHAIRLIÚCHÁN
 LEIS NA PÁIRTITHE LEASMHARA AGUS MÉASÚNUITHE TIONCHAIR
 Díorthaítear an togra seo le haghaidh
 Rialacháin chur chun feidhme go díreach ó théacs an Chomhaontaithe a
 caibidlíodh le Meiriceá Láir. Dá bhrí sin, níl gá le haon chomhairliúchán ar
 leith le páirtithe leasmhara ná le haon mheasúnú tionchair. Tá sé bunaithe den
 chuid is mó ar rialacháin chur chun feidhme atá ann cheana.
 3. EILIMINTÍ DLÍ AN TOGRA
 Achoimre ar an ngníomhaíocht atá beartaithe
 Is é atá sa togra le haghaidh Rialacháin ó
 Pharlaimint na hEorpa agus ón gComhairle a ghabhann leis seo ionstraim dlí chun
 clásal cosanta agus Meicníocht Cobhsaíochta an Chomhaontaithe Comhlachais idir
 an AE agus Meiriceá Láir a chur chun feidhme.
 Bunús dlí
 Airteagal 207(2) den Chonradh ar
 Fheidhmiú an Aontais Eorpaigh.
 2011/0263 (COD)
 Togra le haghaidh
 RIALACHÁIN Ó PHARLAIMINT NA hEORPA AGUS
 ÓN gCOMHAIRLE
 lena gcuirtear chun feidhme clásal cosanta
 déthaobhach agus meicníocht cobhsaíochta um bananaí an Chomhaontaithe lena
 mbunaítear Comhlachas idir an tAontas Eorpach agus a Bhallstáit ar thaobh
 amháin agus Meiriceá Láir ar an taobh eile
 TÁ
 PARLAIMINT NA hEORPA AGUS COMHAIRLE AN AONTAIS EORPAIGH,
 Ag féachaint don Chonradh ar Fheidhmiú an
 Aontais Eorpaigh, agus go háirithe Airteagal 207(2) de,
 Ag féachaint don
 togra ón gCoimisiún Eorpach,
 Tar éis dóibh an
 dréachtghníomh reachtach a chur chuig na parlaimintí náisiúnta,
 Ag gníomhú dóibh
 i gcomhréir leis an ngnáthnós imeachta reachtach[1],
 De bharr an méid seo
 a leanas:
 (1)
 Ar an 23 Aibreán 2007 d'údaraigh an
 Chomhairle an Coimisiún tús a chur le caibidlíochtaí le tíortha áirithe
 Mheiriceá Láir ('Meiriceá Láir') le haghaidh Comhaontú lena mbunófaí Comhlachas
 idir an tAontas Eorpach agus a Bhallstáit ar thaobh amháin agus, Meiriceá Láir
 ar an taobh eile ('an Comhaontú') thar ceann an Aontais agus a Bhallstát.
 (2)
 Tugadh na caibidlíochtaí sin chun críche agus
 cuireadh inisealacha leis an gComhaontú an 22 Márta 2011 agus, i
 gcomhréir le Cinneadh Uimh. .../2011/AE ón gComhairle an...[2] síníodh
 an Comhaontú thar ceann an Aontais Eorpaigh an..., faoi réir a thabhairt chun
 críche ag dáta níos déanaí. Ar an (...), thug Parlaimint na
 hEorpa toiliú i leith an Chomhaontaithe. Ina dhiaidh sin,
 ghlac an Chomhairle Cinneadh Uimh. .../2011 an...[3] maidir le
 tabhairt i gcrích an Chomhaontaithe.
 (3)
 Is gá nósanna imeachta a leagan síos maidir le
 forálacha áirithe den Chomhaontú a chur i bhfeidhm a bhaineann leis an gclásal
 cosanta déthaobhach agus maidir leis an Meicníocht Cobhsaíochta um Bananaí a
 comhaontaíodh le Meiriceá Láir a chur i bhfeidhm.
 (4)
 Ba cheart na téarmaí "mórdhíobháil",
 "bagairt mórdhíobhála" agus "idirthréimhse" dá dtagraítear
 in Airteagal 104 agus Airteagal 105 den Chomhaontú a shainiú.
 (5)
 Níor cheart breithniú i dtaobh bearta cosanta a
 dhéanamh ach amháin i gcás ina n‐allmhairítear an táirge i dtrácht
 isteach san Aontas i gcainníochtaí a bhfuil méadú den sórt sin orthu, i
 ndearbhthéarmaí nó i gcoibhneas le táirgeacht an Aontais, agus faoi
 choinníollacha den sórt a dhéanfadh mórdhíobháil, nó a bheadh ina mbagairt
 mórdhíobhála, do tháirgeoirí an Aontais a tháirgeann táirgí cosúla nó táirgí
 dír‐iomaíocha, faoi mar atá leagtha síos in Airteagal 104 den
 Chomhaontú.
 (6)
 Ba cheart go mbeadh na bearta cosanta i gceann de
 na riochtaí dá dtagraítear in Airteagal 104(2) den Chomhaontú.
 (7)
 Maidir leis na cúraimí a ghabhann le himscrúduithe
 a dhéanamh agus, más gá, a ghabhann le bearta cosanta a fhorchur, ba cheart iad
 a dhéanamh sa mhodh is trédhearcaí is féidir.
 (8)
 Ba cheart forálacha mionsonraithe a bheith ann
 maidir le himeachtaí a thionscnamh. Ba cheart don Choimisiún faisnéis a fháil,
 lena n‐áirítear fianaise atá ar fáil ó na Ballstáit, i ndáil le haon
 treochtaí allmhairiúcháin a d'fhéadfadh a fhágáil gur ghá bearta cosanta a chur
 i bhfeidhm.
 (9)
 Má tá fianaise leordhóthanach prima facie
 ann chun go mbeidh údar maith le himeacht a thionscnamh, ba cheart don
 Choimisiún fógra a fhoilsiú in Iris Oifigiúil an Aontais Eorpaigh, faoi
 mar a fhoráiltear in Airteagal 111(3) den Chomhaontú.
 (10)
 Ba cheart forálacha mionsonraithe a bheith ann
 maidir le himscrúduithe a thionscnamh, maidir le rochtain agus cigireacht na
 bpáirtithe leasmhara ar an bhfaisnéis arna bailiú, maidir le héisteachtaí do na
 páirtithe lena mbaineann, agus maidir le deiseanna atá ag na páirtithe sin a
 gcuid tuairimí a chur isteach, faoi mar a fhoráiltear in Airteagal 111(3)
 den Chomhaontú.
 (11)
 Ba cheart don Choimisiún fógra a thabhairt do Mheiriceá
 Láir i scríbhinn i leith imscrúdú a thionscnamh agus fógra a thabhairt don
 Choiste Comhlachais i leith thorthaí na n‐imscrúduithe faoi mar a
 fhoráiltear in Airteagal 116 den Chomhaontú.
 (12)
 Is gá freisin, de bhun Airteagal 112 den
 Chomhaontú, teorainneacha ama a shocrú maidir le himscrúduithe a thionscnamh
 agus maidir le cinntí a dhéanamh i dtaobh cé acu is iomchuí nó nach iomchuí
 bearta a dhéanamh, d’fhonn a áirithiú go ndéanfar na cinntí sin go tapa chun
 deimhneacht dhlíthiúil na n‐oibreoirí eacnamaíocha lena mbaineann a
 mhéadú.
 (13)
 Ba cheart imscrúdú a dhéanamh sula gcuirfear aon
 bheart cosanta i bhfeidhm, ach sin faoi réir cead a bheith ag an gCoimisiún
 bearta sealadacha a chur i bhfeidhm in imthosca géibheannacha dá dtagraítear in
 Airteagal 106 den Chomhaontú.
 (14)
 Níor cheart bearta cosanta a chur i bhfeidhm ach a
 mhéid is gá, agus go ceann cibé tréimhse is gá, chun mórdhíobháil a sheachaint
 agus chun oiriúnú a éascú. Ba cheart ré uasta na mbeart cosanta a chinneadh
 agus ba cheart forálacha sonracha i dtaca le fadú agus athbhreithniú na mbeart
 sin a leagan síos, ar nithe iad sin dá dtagraítear in Airteagal 105 den
 Chomhaontú.
 (15)
 Chun clásal cosanta déthaobhach an Chomhaontaithe a
 chur chun feidhme, éilítear coinníollacha comhionanna maidir le bearta
 sealadacha cosanta agus bearta cinntitheacha cosanta a ghlacadh, maidir le
 réamhbhearta faireachais a fhorchur, agus maidir le himscrúdú a fhoirceannadh
 gan bearta a dhéanamh agus maidir le fionraí shealadach na dleachta custaim
 fabhraí arna bunú faoin meicníocht cobhsaíochta um bananaí a comhaontaíodh le
 Meiriceá Láir. Ba cheart don Choimisiún na bearta sin a
 ghlacadh i gcomhréir le Rialachán (AE) Uimh. 182/2011 ó Pharlaimint na
 hEorpa agus ón gComhairle an 16 Feabhra 2011 lena leagtar síos na rialacha agus
 na prionsabail ghinearálta a bhaineann leis na sásraí maidir le rialú ag na
 Ballstáit ar fheidhmiú cumhachtaí cur chun feidhme ag an gCoimisiún[4].
 (16)
 Is iomchuí go n‐úsáidfear an nós imeachta
 comhairleach chun bearta faireachais agus bearta sealadacha a ghlacadh i bhfianaise
 éifeachtaí na mbeart sin agus a loighce seicheamhaí maidir le glacadh beart
 cosanta cinntitheach. I gcás ina mbeadh moill ar fhorchur na mbeart ina cúis le
 damáiste a bheadh deacair a leigheas, is gá a cheadú don Choimisiún bearta
 sealadacha atá infheidhme láithreach a ghlacadh.
 (17)
 Ba cheart feidhm a bheith ag an Rialachán seo
 maidir le táirgí de thionscnamh an Aontais nó Mheiriceá Láir agus maidir leis
 na táirgí sin amháin,
 TAR ÉIS AN RIALACHÁN SEO A
 GHLACADH:
 Caibidil I – Foráil maidir le cosaint
 Airteagal 1
 Sainmhínithe
 Chun críocha an
 Rialacháin seo:
 (a)
 ciallaíonn "táirgí" earraí de thionscnamh
 an Aontais nó tíre de chuid Mheiriceá Láir. Maidir le táirge atá faoi réir
 imscrúdaithe, d’fhéadfadh sé go gcuimseofar leis líne tharaife amháin nó roinnt
 línte taraife, nó fodheighilt de líne tharaife, ag brath ar imthosca sonracha
 an mhargaidh nó ar aon deighilt táirgí a chuirtear i bhfeidhm go coitianta i
 dtionscal an Aontais;
 (b)
 ciallaíonn "páirtithe leasmhara" na
 páirtithe a ndéanann allmhairiú an táirge i dtrácht difear dóibh;
 (c)
 ciallaíonn "tionscal an Aontais"
 táirgeoirí an Aontais ina n‐iomláine a tháirgeann táirgí cosúla nó táirgí
 dír‐iomaíocha agus a oibríonn laistigh de chríoch an Aontais, nó na
 táirgeoirí sin de chuid an Aontais arb ionann a gcomh‐aschur de tháirgí
 cosúla nó de tháirgí dír‐iomaíocha agus cion mór de tháirgeacht iomlán an
 Aontais i dtaca leis na táirgí sin. I gcásanna nach bhfuil
 sa táirge cosúil nó sa táirge dír‐iomaíoch ach táirge amháin de roinnt
 táirgí arna ndéanamh ag na táirgeoirí arb ionann iad agus tionscal an Aontais,
 déanfar an tionscal a shainmhíniú mar oibríochtaí sonracha a bhaineann le
 táirgeadh an táirge chosúil nó an táirge dhír‐iomaíoch;
 (d)
 ciallaíonn "mórdhíobháil" lagú suntasach
 iomlán ar sheasamh tháirgeoirí an Aontais;
 (e)
 ciallaíonn "bagairt mórdhíobhála"
 mórdhíobháil ar léir ina leith go bhfuil sí ar tí tarlú. Beidh cinneadh i
 dtaobh bagairt mórdhíobhála a bheith ann bunaithe ar fhíorais infhíoraithe
 amháin seachas ar líomhaintí, ar thuairimíocht nó ar fhéidearthacht fhánach. Ba
 cheart réamhaisnéisí, meastacháin agus anailísí a dhéantar ar bhonn na
 bhfachtóirí dá dtagraítear in Airteagal 4(5) a chur san áireamh, inter
 alia, chun a chinneadh an bhfuil bagairt mórdhíobhála ann;
 (f)
 ciallaíonn 'idirthréimhse' 10 mbliana ón dáta ar ar
 cuireadh an Comhaontú i bhfeidhm i gcás aon táirge dá ndéanann an Sceideal um
 Dhíchur Taraife foráil maidir le tréimhse níos lú ná 10 mbliana le haghaidh
 dhíchur na taraife. I gcás na dtáirgí dá ndéanann an Sceideal um Dhíchur
 Taraife foráil maidir le tréimhse 10 mbliana nó níos mó le haghaidh dhíchur na
 taraife ina leith, ciallaíonn 'idirthréimhse' an tréimhse le haghaidh dhíchur
 na taraife don táirge arna leagan amach sa Sceideal sin, móide 3 bliana.
 (g)
 ciallaíonn 'tír de chuid Mheiriceá Láir' Cósta
 Ríce, an tSalvadóir, Guatamala, Hondúras, Nicearagua nó Panama.
 Airteagal 2
 Prionsabail
 1.
 Féadfar beart cosanta a fhorchur i gcomhréir leis
 an Rialachán seo, más rud é go bhfuil táirge de thionscnamh tíre de chuid
 Mheiriceá Láir, mar thoradh ar na dleachtanna custaim ar an táirge sin a laghdú
 nó a dhíchur, á allmhairiú isteach san Aontas i gcainníochtaí a bhfuil méadú
 den sórt sin orthu, i ndearbhthéarmaí nó i gcoibhneas le táirgeacht an Aontais,
 agus faoi choinníollacha den sórt sin a dhéanfadh mórdhíobháil, nó a bheadh ina
 mbagairt mórdhíobhála do thionscal an Aontais a tháirgeann táirge cosúil nó
 táirge dír‐iomaíoch.
 2.
 Féadfaidh na bearta cosanta a bheith i gceann de na
 riochtaí seo a leanas:
 (a)
 tuilleadh laghdaithe ar an ráta dleachta custaim a
 fhionraí ar an táirge lena mbaineann, ar fionraí í dá bhforáiltear i Sceideal
 Pháirtí an AE atá leagtha amach in Iarscríbhinn I (Dleachtanna Custaim a
 Dhíchur) a ghabhann leis an gComhaontú;
 (b)
 an ráta dleachta custaim ar an táirge lena
 mbaineann a mhéadú go leibhéal nach mó ná an ráta is ísle díobh seo a leanas:
 –
 ráta dleachta custaim an náisiúin bharrfhabhair
 ("NBF") a chuirtear i bhfeidhm maidir leis an táirge agus atá i
 bhfeidhm an tráth a ndéantar an beart; nó
 –
 ráta dleachta custaim NBF a chuirtear i bhfeidhm
 maidir leis an táirge agus atá i bhfeidhm ar an lá díreach roimh dháta theacht
 i bhfeidhm an Chomhaontaithe.
 3.
 Ní chuirfear aon cheann de na bearta thuas i
 bhfeidhm laistigh de theorainneacha na gcuótaí taraife fabhraí saor ó dhleacht
 arna ndeonú ag an gComhaontú seo.
 Airteagal 3
 Imeachtaí a thionscnamh
 1.
 Déanfar imscrúdú a thionscnamh arna iarraidh sin do
 Bhallstát, d’aon duine dlítheanach nó d’aon chomhlachas nach bhfuil
 pearsantacht dhlítheanach aige, ag gníomhú dóibh thar ceann thionscal an
 Aontais, nó ar fhéintionscnamh an Choimisiúin más dealraitheach don Choimisiún
 go bhfuil fianaise leordhóthanach prima facie ann, arna chinneadh ar
 bhonn na bhfachtóirí dá dtagraítear in Airteagal 4(5), le bheith ina húdar
 maith le tionscnamh den sórt sin.
 2.
 An iarraidh imscrúdú a thionscnamh, beidh inti
 fianaise go bhfuil na coinníollacha á gcomhlíonadh maidir leis an mbeart
 cosanta atá leagtha amach in Airteagal 2(1) a fhorchur. De ghnáth, beidh
 an fhaisnéis seo a leanas san iarraidh: ráta agus méid an
 mhéadaithe ar allmhairí i ndáil leis an táirge lena mbaineann, arna shloinneadh
 i ndearbhthéarmaí agus i dtéarmaí coibhneasta, an sciar den mhargadh baile a
 bhaineann leis na hallmhairí méadaithe, na hathruithe ar an leibhéal
 díolacháin, an táirgeacht, an táirgiúlacht, úsáid acmhainne, brabúis agus caillteanais,
 agus fostaíocht.
 3.
 Féadfar imscrúdú a thionscnamh freisin i gcás ina
 dtagann borradh ar allmhairí i mBallstát amháin nó i roinnt Ballstát, ar
 choinníoll go bhfuil fianaise leordhóthanach prima facie ann go bhfuil
 na coinníollacha maidir le tionscnamh á gcomhlíonadh, de réir mar a chinntear
 ar bhonn na bhfachtóirí dá dtagraítear in Airteagal 4(5).
 4.
 Cuirfidh Ballstát an Coimisiún ar an eolas más
 dealraitheach go léiríonn treochtaí san allmhairiú ó Mheiriceá Láir go bhfuil
 gá le bearta cosanta. Beidh ar áireamh san fhaisnéis sin an fhianaise atá ar
 fáil de réir mar a chinntear ar bhonn na bhfachtóirí dá dtagraítear in Airteagal 4(5).
 Cuirfidh an Coimisiún an fhaisnéis sin ar aghaidh chuig na Ballstáit go léir.
 5.
 Más rud é go ndealraíonn sé go bhfuil fianaise
 leordhóthanach prima facie ann, de réir mar a chinntear ar bhonn na
 bhfachtóirí dá dtagraítear in Airteagal 4(5), chun údar a thabhairt le
 himeacht a thionscnamh, foilseoidh an Coimisiún fógra in Iris Oifigiúil an
 Aontais Eorpaigh. Tionscnófar imeacht laistigh d'aon mhí amháin ón iarraidh
 nó ón bhfaisnéis a fháil de bhun mhír 1.
 6.
 Déanfar an méid seo a leanas san fhógra dá
 dtagraítear i mír 5:
 (c)
 tabharfar achoimre ann ar an bhfaisnéis a fuarthas
 agus ceanglófar leis go ndéanfar an fhaisnéis ábhartha uile a chur chuig an
 gCoimisiún;
 (d)
 luafar an tréimhse ina bhféadfaidh páirtithe
 leasmhara a gcuid tuairimí a chur in iúl i scríbhinn agus faisnéis a chur
 isteach, más rud é go bhfuil na tuairimí agus an fhaisnéis sin le cur san
 áireamh le linn an imscrúdaithe;
 (e)
 luafar an tréimhse ina bhféadfaidh páirtithe
 leasmhara cur isteach ar éisteacht ó bhéal os comhair an Choimisiúin i
 gcomhréir le hAirteagal 4(9).
 Airteagal 4
 An t‐imscrúdú
 1.
 Tar éis an t‐imeacht a thionscnamh, cuirfidh
 an Coimisiún tús le himscrúdú. Tosóidh an tréimhse, faoi
 mar a leagtar amach i mír 3, ar an lá a bhfoilseofar an cinneadh chun imscrúdú
 a thionscnamh in Iris Oifigiúil an Aontais Eorpaigh.
 2.
 Féadfaidh an Coimisiún iarraidh ar na Ballstáit
 faisnéis a sholáthar agus glacfaidh na Ballstáit cibé beart is gá chun gníomhú
 de réir na hiarrata sin. Más rud é gur faisnéis de chineál leasa ghinearálta í
 an fhaisnéis sin, agus nach faisnéis rúnda í de réir bhrí Airteagal 11,
 cuirfear leis na comhaid neamhrúnda í, faoi mar a fhoráiltear i mír 8.
 3.
 Aon uair is féidir, cuirfear an t‐imscrúdú i
 gcrích laistigh de shé mhí tar éis é a thionscnamh. Féadfar trí mhí a chur leis
 an teorainn ama sin in imthosca eisceachtúla, amhail líon neamhghnách ard
 páirtithe a bheith ann nó staideanna casta margaidh. Déanfaidh an Coimisiún
 fógra a thabhairt do na páirtithe leasmhara go léir i dtaobh aon fhadaithe den
 sórt sin agus míneoidh sé na cúiseanna leis an bhfadú sin.
 4.
 Lorgóidh an Coimisiún an fhaisnéis uile a mheasann
 sé a bheith riachtanach chun cinneadh a dhéanamh maidir leis na coinníollacha
 atá leagtha amach in Airteagal 2(1), agus, i gcás ina measann sé gurb
 iomchuí, féachfaidh sé leis an bhfaisnéis sin a fhíorú.
 5.
 Agus an t‐imscrúdú á dhéanamh, déanfaidh an
 Coimisiún meastóireacht ar gach fachtóirábhartha atá oibiachtúil agus inchainníochtúil
 agus a imríonn tionchar ar an staid ina bhfuil tionscal an Aontais, go háirithe
 an ráta ag a bhfuil allmhairí an táirge i dtrácht ag ardú agus méid an ardaithe
 sin, i ndearbhthéarmaí agus i dtéarmaí coibhneasta, an sciar sin de mhargadh an
 Aontais a bhaineann leis na hallmhairí méadaithe, athruithe ar an leibhéal
 díolacháin, táirgeadh, táirgiúlacht, úsáid acmhainne, brabúis agus
 caillteanais, agus fostaíocht. Ní liosta iomlán é an
 liosta sin agus d’fhéadfadh an Coimisiún fachtóirí ábhartha eile a chur san
 áireamh agus a chinneadh á dhéanamh aige i dtaobh mórdhíobháil nó bagairt
 mhórdhíobhála a bheith ann, amhail stoic, praghsanna, fáltas ar chaipiteal a
 úsáidtear, sreabhadh airgid, agus fachtóirí eile is cúis le mórdhíobháil, nó a
 d’fhéadfadh a bheith ina gcúis le mórdhíobháil, nó a bhagraíonn a bheith ina
 gcúis le mórdhíobháil do thionscal an Aontais.
 6.
 Féadfaidh páirtithe leasmhara a bheidh tar éis
 teacht chun cinn de bhun Airteagal 3(6)(b), agus féadfaidh ionadaithe
 Mheiriceá Láir, ar iarraidh a dhéanamh i scríbhinn, iniúchadh a dhéanamh ar an
 bhfaisnéis uile a chuirtear ar fáil don Choimisiún i dtaca leis an imscrúdú,
 seachas doiciméid inmheánacha arna n‐ullmhú ag údaráis an Aontais nó ag
 údaráis na mBallstát, ar choinníoll go mbaineann an fhaisnéis sin le tíolacadh
 a gcáis agus nach faisnéis rúnda atá ann de réir bhrí Airteagal 11 agus ar
 choinníoll go bhfuil sí á húsáid ag an gCoimisiún san imscrúdú. Féadfaidh
 páirtithe leasmhara a bheidh tar éis teacht chun cinn a gcuid tuairimí i leith
 na faisnéise a chur in iúl don Choimisiún. Déanfar na tuairimí sin a chur san
 áireamh i gcás ina bhfuil fianaise leordhóthanach prima facie ann chun
 tacú leo.
 7.
 Áiritheoidh an Coimisiún go mbeidh na sonraí uile
 agus an staidreamh go léir a úsáidtear don imscrúdú ar fáil agus go mbeidh siad
 sothuigthe, trédhearcach agus infhíoraithe.
 8.
 Áiritheoidh an Coimisiún, a luaithe a bheidh an
 creat teicniúil is gá ann, go mbeidh rochtain ar líne faoi chosaint pasfhocail
 ann don chomhad neamhrúnda ("ardán ar líne"), agus déanfaidh sé
 bainistiú air sin, agus is trí sin a scaipfear an fhaisnéis go léir atá
 ábhartha agus nach bhfuil faoi rún, de réir bhrí Airteagal 11. Tabharfar
 rochtain ar an ardán ar líne sin do na páirtithe leasmhara san imscrúdú agus,
 chomh maith leis sin, do na Ballstáit agus do Pharlaimint na hEorpa.
 9.
 Tabharfaidh an Coimisiún éisteacht do na páirtithe
 leasmhara, go háirithe i gcás ina bhfuil iarratas i scríbhinn déanta acu
 laistigh den tréimhse a bheidh leagtha síos san fhógra a fhoilseofar in Iris
 Oifigiúil an Aontais Eorpaigh, ar iarratas é ina léireofar gur dóigh
 iarbhír go ndéanfaidh toradh an imscrúdaithe difear dóibh agus go bhfuil
 cúiseanna speisialta ann le héisteacht ó bhéal thabhairt dóibh.
 Tabharfaidh an Coimisiún éisteacht do na páirtithe
 sin ar ócáidí eile má tá cúiseanna speisialta ann le héisteacht a thabhairt
 dóibh arís.
 10.
 Nuair nach soláthraítear an fhaisnéis laistigh de
 na teorainneacha ama a shocraigh an Coimisiún, nó nuair atá bac mór ar an
 imscrúdú, féadfar na cinntí a bhunú ar na fíorais atá le fáil. I gcás ina bhfaigheann an Coimisiún amach go ndearna aon pháirtí
 leasmhar nó aon tríú páirtí faisnéis bhréagach nó mhíthreorach a sholáthar dó,
 déanfaidh sé neamhshuim den fhaisnéis sin agus féadfaidh sé úsáid a bhaint as
 na fíorais atá ar fáil.
 11.
 Tabharfaidh an Coimisiún fógra don tír de chuid
 Mheiriceá Láir lena mbaineann i scríbhinn maidir le imscrúdú a thionscnamh.
 Airteagal 5
 Réamhbhearta faireachais
 1.
 I gcás ina bhfuil an treocht maidir le hallmhairí
 táirge de thionscnamh tíre de chuid Mheiriceá Láir de chineál a fhágann go
 bhféadfadh ceann de na staideanna dá dtagraítear in Airteagal 2 agus in Airteagal 3
 leanúint aisti, féadfar allmhairiú an táirge sin a chur faoi réir réamhbheart
 faireachais.
 2.
 Déanfaidh an Coimisiún réamhbhearta faireachais a ghlacadh
 i gcomhréir leis an nós imeachta comhairleach dá dtagraítear in Airteagal 12(2).
 3.
 Beidh tréimhse theoranta bailíochta ag réamhbhearta
 faireachais. Mura bhforáiltear a mhalairt, scoirfidh siad de bheith bailí ag
 deireadh an dara tréimhse sé mhí tar éis na chéad sé mhí tar éis na bearta a
 thabhairt isteach.
 Airteagal 6
 Bearta cosanta sealadacha a fhorchur
 1.
 In imthosca géibheannacha ina mbeadh moill ina cúis
 le damáiste a bheadh deacair a leigheas, déanfar bearta cosanta sealadacha a
 chur i bhfeidhm de bhun réamhchinnidh, ar bhonn na bhfachtóirí dá dtagraítear
 in Airteagal 4(5), go bhfuil fianaise leordhóthanach prima facie ann go
 bhfuil méadú tagtha ar allmhairí táirge de thionscnamh tíre de chuid Mheiriceá
 Láir de thoradh dleachta custaim a laghdú nó a dhíchur i gcomhréir le Sceideal
 um Dhíchur Taraife an Aontais Eorpaigh, agus go bhfuil allmhairí den sórt sin
 ina gcúis le mórdhíobháil, nó ina gcúis le bagairt mórdhíobhála, do thionscal
 an Aontais.
 Glacfaidh an Coimisiún bearta sealadacha i
 gcomhréir leis an nós imeachta comhairleach dá dtagraítear in Airteagal 12(2).
 I gcásanna ina bhfuil mórchúiseanna práinne ann, lena n‐áirítear an cás
 dá dtagraítear i mír 2, glacfaidh an Coimisiún bearta cosanta sealadacha atá
 infheidhme láithreach, i gcomhréir leis an nós imeachta dá dtagraítear in Airteagal 12(4).
 2.
 I gcás ina n‐iarrann Ballstát ar an
 gCoimisiún idirghabháil láithreach a dhéanamh agus i gcás ina mbeidh na
 coinníollacha a leagtar amach i mír 1 á gcomhlíonadh, déanfaidh an Coimisiún
 cinneadh laistigh de chúig lá oibre tar éis dó an iarraidh a fháil.
 3.
 Beidh feidhm ag bearta sealadacha go ceann tréimhse
 nach faide ná 200 lá.
 4.
 I gcás na bearta cosanta sealadacha a aisghairm
 toisc go léirítear san imscrúdú nach bhfuil na coinníollacha a leagtar amach in
 Airteagal 2(1) á gcomhlíonadh, déanfar aon dleacht custaim a bailíodh mar
 thoradh ar na bearta sealadacha sin a aisíoc go huathoibríoch.
 5.
 Beidh feidhm ag na bearta dá dtagraítear san Airteagal seo
 maidir le gach táirge a chuirtear i saorchúrsaíocht tar éis theacht i bhfeidhm
 na mbeart sin. Ní dhéanfaidh na bearta sin, áfach, cosc a chur le táirgí atá ar
 an mbealach chuig an Aontas cheana féin a scaoileadh le haghaidh
 saorchúrsaíochta ar choinníoll nach féidir ceann scríbe na dtáirgí sin a athrú.
 Airteagal 7
 An t‐imscrúdú a fhoirceannadh agus gníomhú gan bearta a dhéanamh
 1.
 I gcás ina léiríonn na fíorais, faoi mar a shuífear
 go críochnaitheach iad, nach bhfuil na coinníollacha atá leagtha amach in Airteagal 2(1)
 á gcomhlíonadh, glacfaidh an Coimisiún cinneadh lena gcuirfear deireadh leis an
 imscrúdú agus lena ngníomhófar i gcomhréir leis an nós imeachta scrúdúcháin dá
 dtagraítear in Airteagal 12(3).
 2.
 Déanfaidh an Coimisiún, ag féachaint go cuí do
 chosaint faisnéise rúnda de réir bhrí Airteagal 11, tuarascáil a phoibliú ina
 leagfar amach a chinntí agus na conclúidí réasúnaithe ar thángthas orthu maidir
 le gach saincheist chuí fíorais agus dlí.
 Airteagal 8
 Bearta cinntitheacha a fhorchur
 1.
 I gcás ina léiríonn na fíorais, faoi mar a shuífear
 go críochnaitheach iad, go bhfuil na coinníollacha atá leagtha amach in Airteagal 2(1)
 á gcomhlíonadh, déanfaidh an Coimisiún an t‐ábhar a chur faoi bhráid an
 Choiste Comhlachais i gcomhréir le hAirteagal 116 den Chomhaontú. I gcás
 nach ndearna an Coiste Comhlachais aon mholadh nó nár thángthas ar aon réiteach
 sásúil eile laistigh de 30 lá ón tarchur, féadfaidh an Coimisiún cinneadh a
 ghlacadh lena bhforchuirtear bearta cinntitheacha cosanta i gcomhréir leis an
 nós imeachta scrúdúcháin dá dtagraítear in Airteagal 12(3).
 2.
 Déanfaidh an Coimisiún, ag féachaint go cuí do
 chosaint faisnéise rúnda de réir bhrí Airteagal 11, tuarascáil a phoibliú
 ina mbeidh achoimre ar na fíorais ábharacha agus ar na nithe atá ábhartha don
 chinneadh.
 Airteagal 9
 Na bearta cosanta: ré agus athbhreithniú
 1.
 Ní leanfaidh beart cosanta de bheith i bhfeidhm ach
 go ceann cibé tréimhse a mbeidh gá léi chun bac a chur ar an mórdhíobháil nó
 chun an mhórdhíobháil sin a leigheas, agus chun oiriúnú a éascú. Ní rachaidh an
 tréimhse sin thar dhá bhliain, ach amháin má fhadaítear faoi mhír 3 í.
 2.
 Go dtí go bhfaightear toradh an athbhreithnithe
 faoi mhír 3, leanfaidh beart cosanta de bheith i bhfeidhm i rith aon tréimhse
 fadaithe.
 3.
 Féadfar, mar eisceacht, suas le dhá bhliain a chur
 le tústréimhse birt chosanta, ar choinníoll go ndearbhaítear go bhfuil gá leis
 an mbeart cosanta i gcónaí chun bac a chur ar mhórdhíobháil nó chun
 mórdhíobháil a leigheas agus ar choinníoll go bhfuil fianaise ann go bhfuil
 tionscal an Aontais á oiriúnú féin.
 4.
 Sula ndéanfar aon fhadú de bhun mhír 3 déanfar
 imscrúdú a thionscnamh arna iarraidh sin do Bhallstát, d’aon duine dlítheanach
 nó d’aon chomhlachas nach bhfuil pearsantacht dhlítheanach aige, ag gníomhú
 dóibh thar ceann thionscal an Aontais, nó ar fhéintionscnamh an Choimisiúin má
 tá fianaise leordhóthanach prima facie ann, go bhfuil na coinníollacha
 arna leagan síos i mír 3 á gcomhlíonadh, ar bhonn na bhfachtóirí dá dtagraítear
 in Airteagal 4(5).
 5.
 Foilseofar tionscnamh imscrúdaithe i gcomhréir le hAirteagal 3(5)
 agus Airteagal 3(6). Déanfar an t‐imscrúdú agus aon chinneadh maidir
 le fadú de bhun mhír 3 i gcomhréir le forálacha Airteagail 4,7 agus 8.
 6.
 Ní fhéadfaidh ré iomlán an bhirt chosanta dul thar
 cheithre bliana, lena n‐áirítear aon bheart sealadach.
 7.
 Ní chuirfear beart cosanta i bhfeidhm tar éis don
 idirthréimhse dul in éag, ach amháin le toiliú na tíre de chuid Mheiriceá Láir
 lena mbaineann.
 8.
 Ní chuirfear aon bheart cosanta i bhfeidhm maidir
 le hallmhairiú táirge a bhí faoi réir birt dá leithéid, mura rud é go bhfuil
 tréimhse caite arb ionann í agus leath na tréimhse inar cuireadh an beart
 cosanta i bhfeidhm don tréimhse díreach roimpi.
 Airteagal 10
 Na réigiúin is
 forimeallaí san Aontas Eorpach
 1.
 I gcás ina bhfuil aon táirge de thionscnamh tíre de
 chuid Mheiriceá Láir á allmhairiú i gcainníochtaí a bhfuil méadú den sórt
 tagtha air agus faoi choinníollacha den sórt a d'fhéadfadh dochar mór a
 dhéanamh don staid eacnamaíoch nó a d'fhéadfadh a bheith ina chúis le dochar
 mór a dhéanamh don staid eacnamaíoch i gceann amháin nó níos mó de na réigiúin
 is forimeallaí san Aontas dá dtagraítear in Airteagal 349 den Chonradh ar
 Fheidhmiú an Aontais Eorpaigh, féadfar beart cosanta a fhorchur, i gcomhréir
 leis na forálacha atá leagtha amach sa chaibidil seo.
 Airteagal 11
 Rúndacht
 1.
 Is chun na críche a iarradh í, agus chun na críche
 sin amháin, a fhéadfar faisnéis a fhaightear de bhun an Rialacháin seo a úsáid.
 2.
 Ní dhéanfar faisnéis ar bith de chineál rúnda a
 fhaightear de bhun an Rialacháin seo, ná aon fhaisnéis a sholáthraítear ar
 bhonn rúnda agus a fhaightear de bhun an Rialacháin seo, a nochtadh gan cead
 sonrach a fháil ó sholáthróir na faisnéise sin.
 3.
 I ngach iarraidh ar rúndacht, luafar na cúiseanna
 leis an bhfaisnéis a bheith rúnda. Más rud é, áfach, nach mian le soláthróir na
 faisnéise an fhaisnéis a phoibliú ná nochtadh na faisnéise i dtéarmaí
 ginearálta nó i bhfoirm achoimre a údarú agus go ndealraíonn sé nach bhfuil
 údar maith leis an iarraidh ar rúndacht, féadfar neamhshuim a dhéanamh den
 fhaisnéis lena mbaineann.
 4.
 Ar chaoi ar bith, measfar go bhfuil gach faisnéis
 rúnda más dócha go n‐imreoidh a nochtadh mór‐éifeacht dhíobhálach
 ar sholáthróir nó ar fhoinse na faisnéise sin.
 5.
 Ní fhágfaidh mír 1 go 4 nach bhféadfaidh údaráis an
 Aontais tagairt a dhéanamh d'fhaisnéis ghinearálta agus, go háirithe, do
 chúiseanna ar a bhfuil cinntí arna ndéanamh de bhun an Rialacháin seo bunaithe.
 Mar sin féin, cuirfidh na húdaráis sin san áireamh leas dlisteanach na ndaoine
 nádúrtha agus na ndaoine dlítheanacha lena mbaineann ar mian leo nach nochtfar
 a gcuid rún gnó.
 Airteagal 12
 Nós imeachta coiste
 1.
 Déanfaidh an Coiste arna bhunú le hAirteagal 4(1)
 de Rialachán (CE) Uimh. 260/2009 ón gComhairle an 26 Feabhra 2009 maidir
 le comhrialacha le haghaidh hallmhairí[5]
 cúnamh a thabhairt don Choimisiún. Beidh an Coiste sin ina
 Choiste de réir bhrí Rialachán (AE) Uimh. 182/2011.
 2.
 I gcás ina ndéanfar tagairt don mhír seo,
 beidh feidhm ag Airteagal 4 de Rialachán (AE) Uimh. 182/2011.
 3.
 I gcás ina ndéanfar tagairt don mhír seo,
 beidh feidhm ag Airteagal 5 de Rialachán (AE) Uimh. 182/2011.
 4.
 I gcás ina ndéanfar tagairt don mhír seo,
 beidh feidhm ag Airteagal 8 de Rialachán (AE) Uimh. 182/2011 i
 gcomhar le hAirteagal 4 den Rialachán sin.
 Caibidil II – Meicníocht cobhsaíochta do bhananaí
 Airteagal 13
 Meicníocht
 cobhsaíochta do Bhananaí
 1.
 I gcás bananaí de thionscnamh Mheiriceá Láir faoi
 cheannteideal 0803.00.19 den Ainmníocht Chomhcheangailte (bananaí úra, gan
 plantáin a áireamh) agus atá liostaithe faoi chatagóir 'ST' i Sceideal Pháirtí
 an AE atá leagtha amach in Iarscríbhinn I (Dleachtanna Custaim a Dhíchur) a
 ghabhann leis an gComhaontú, beidh feidhm ag meicníocht cobhsaíochta go dtí an
 1 Eanáir 2020.
 2.
 Socraítear leibhéal truiceartha do mhéideanna
 allmhairí ó thír de chuid Mheiriceá Láir le haghaidh táirgí a luaitear i mír 1
 mar a léirítear sa tábla san Iarscríbhinn a ghabhann leis an Rialachán seo. Beidh allmhairiú táirgí a luaitear i mír 1 ag an
 ráta dleachta custaim fabhrach, sa bhreis ar an gcruthúnas tionscnaimh arna
 bhunú faoi Iarscríbhinn III (Sainmhíniú ar an gcoincheap 'táirgí
 tionscnaimh' agus modhanna comhair riaracháin) a ghabhann leis an gComhaontú le
 Meiriceá Láir, beidh siad faoi réir deimhniú onnmhairiúcháin a thíolacadh ar
 deimhniú é arna eisiúint ag údarás inniúil Phoblacht na tíre de chuid Mheiriceá
 Láir óna n‐onnmhairítear na táirgí. Chomh luath agus
 a shroichtear an leibhéal truicearaithe don mhéid le linn na bliana féilire
 comhfhreagraí, féadfaidh an Coimisiún, i gcomhréir leis an nós imeachta
 scrúdúcháin dá dtagraítear in Airteagal 12(3), an dleacht custaim
 fhabhrach a fhionraí go sealadach le linn na bliana céanna go ceann tréimhse
 nach mó ná trí mhí, agus nach dtéann thar dheireadh na bliana féilire.
 3.
 I gcás ina gcinneann an Coimisiún an dleacht
 custaim fhabhrach is infheidhme a fhionraí, cuirfidh an Coimisiún an ceann is
 lú de cheachtar den bhonnráta dleachta custaim nó den ráta dleachta NBF i
 bhfeidhm a bhí i bhfeidhm tráth a ndearnadh an ghníomhaíocht sin.
 4.
 I gcás ina gcuireann an Coimisiún na gníomhaíochtaí
 a luaitear i míreanna 2 agus 3 i bhfeidhm, rachaidh sé i gcomhairle
 láithreach leis an tír atá thíos leo chun an cás a anailísiú agus a mheasúnú ar
 bhonn sonraí fíorasacha atá ar fáil.
 5.
 Féadfaidh na bearta a luaitear i míreanna 2
 agus 3 a bheith infheidhme i rith na tréimse dar críoch 31 Nollaig 2019
 agus le linn na tréimhse sin amháin.
 Caibidil III – Forálacha críochnaitheacha
 Airteagal 14
 Teacht i bhfeidhm
 Tiocfaidh an Rialachán seo i bhfeidhm an lá
 tar éis lá a fhoilsithe in Iris Oifigiúil an Aontais Eorpaigh.
 Beidh feidhm aige ó dháta chur i bhfeidhm an
 Chomhaontaithe, de réir mar a fhoráiltear in Airteagal 353 den Chomhaontú
 sin. Foilseofar fógra in Iris Oifigiúil an Aontais Eorpaigh ina luafar
 dáta chur i bhfeidhm an Chomhaontaithe.
 Beidh an Rialachán seo ina cheangal
 go huile agus go hiomlán agus infheidhme go díreach i ngach Ballstát.
 Arna dhéanamh sa Bhruiséil,
 Thar ceann Pharlaimint na hEorpa Thar
 ceann na Comhairle
 An tUachtarán An
 tUachtarán
 Iarscríbhinn
 Tábla
 maidir le leibhéil truiceartha do mhéideanna allmhairí le haghaidh chur i
 bhfeidhm na meicníochta cobhsaíochta do bhananaí in Aguisín 3 d'Iarscríbhinn I
 a ghabhann leis an gComhaontú
 Bliain || Leibhéil truiceartha do mhéid allmhairí, i dtonna
 Cósta Ríce || Panama || Hondúras || Guatamala || Nicearagua || an tSalvadóir
 Go dtí an 31 Nollaig 2010 || 1 025 000 || 375 000 || 50 000 || 50 000 || 10 000 || 2 000
 1.1-31.12.2011 || 1 076 250 || 393 750 || 52 500 || 52 500 || 10 500 || 2 100
 1.1-31.12.2012 || 1 127 500 || 412 500 || 55 000 || 55 000 || 11 000 || 2 200
 1.1-31.12.2013 || 1 178 750 || 431 250 || 57 500 || 57 500 || 11 500 || 2 300
 1.1-31.12.2014 || 1 230 000 || 450 000 || 60 000 || 60 000 || 12 000 || 2 400
 1.1-31.12.2015 || 1 281 250 || 468 750 || 62 500 || 62 500 || 12 500 || 2 500
 1.1-31.12.2016 || 1 332 500 || 487 500 || 65 000 || 65 000 || 13 000 || 2 600
 1.1-31.12.2017 || 1 383 750 || 506 250 || 67 500 || 67 500 || 13 500 || 2 700
 1.1-31.12.2018 || 1 435 000 || 525 000 || 70 000 || 70 000 || 14 000 || 2 800
 1.1-31.12.2019 || 1 486 250 || 543 750 || 72 500 || 72 500 || 14 500 || 2 900
 1.1.2020 agus tar éis sin || neamhbhainteach || neamhbhainteach || neamhbhainteach || neamhbhainteach || neamhbhainteach || neamhbhainteach
 [1] Seasamh ó Pharlaimint na hEorpa an 17 Feabhra 2011 (nár foilsíodh fós
 san Iris Oifigiúil) agus cinneadh ón gComhairle an ...
 [2]
 [3]
 [4] IO L 55, 28.2.2011, lch. 13.
 [5] IO L 84, 31.3.2009, lch. 1.


text:
 6.4.2017
 CS
 Úřední věstník Evropské unie
 C 108/14
 ROZSUDEK SOUDNÍHO DVORA
 ze dne 29. července 2016
 ve věci E-31/15
 Kontrolní úřad ESVO v. Island
 (Nesplnění povinností státem ESVO – neprovedení do vnitrostátního práva – směrnice 2011/77/EU, kterou se mění směrnice 2006/116/ES o době ochrany autorského práva a určitých práv s ním souvisejících)
 (2017/C 108/12)
 Ve věci E-31/15, Kontrolní úřad ESVO v. Island – NÁVRH na prohlášení, že Island nesplnil své povinnosti podle aktu uvedeného v odrážce bodu 9f přílohy XVII Dohody o Evropském hospodářském prostoru (směrnice Evropského parlamentu a Rady 2011/77/EU ze dne 27. září 2011, kterou se mění směrnice 2006/116/ES o době ochrany autorského práva a určitých práv s ním souvisejících), začleněného do Dohody o EHP protokolem 1 k uvedené dohodě, a podle článku 7 Dohody o EHP, neboť nepřijal opatření nezbytná k provedení aktu ve stanovené lhůtě, nebo o skutečnosti v každém případě neinformoval Kontrolní úřad ESVO, vynesl Soudní dvůr ve složení Carl Baudenbacher, předseda, Per Christiansen (soudce-zpravodaj) a Páll Hreinsson, soudci, dne 29. července 2016 rozsudek, jehož výrok zní:
 Soudní dvůr tímto:
 1.
 Prohlašuje, že Island nepřijal opatření nezbytná k tomu, aby ve stanovené lhůtě do svého vnitrostátního práva provedl akt uvedený v odrážce bodu 9f přílohy XVII Dohody o Evropském hospodářském prostoru (směrnice Evropského parlamentu a Rady 2011/77/EU ze dne 27. září 2011, kterou se mění směrnice 2006/116/ES o době ochrany autorského práva a určitých práv s ním souvisejících), začleněný do Dohody o EHP protokolem 1 k uvedené dohodě, a nesplnil tak své povinnosti podle uvedeného aktu a podle článku 7 Dohody o EHP.
 2.
 Ukládá Islandu uhradit náklady řízení.


text:
 5.12.2009
 PT
 Jornal Oficial da União Europeia
 C 297/7
 Acórdão do Tribunal de Justiça (Terceira Secção) de 15 de Outubro de 2009 (pedido de decisão prejudicial do Finanzgericht Baden-Württemberg — Alemanha) — Grundstücksgemeinschaft Busley e Cibrian Fernandez/Finanzamt Stuttgart-Körperschaften
 (Processo C-35/08) (1)
 («Livre circulação de capitais - Imóveis - Imposto sobre o rendimento - Dedutibilidade das perdas locativas dos rendimentos tributáveis de um sujeito passivo - Aplicação de uma amortização regressiva sobre os custos de aquisição ou de construção - Tratamento fiscal mais favorável reservado apenas aos imóveis situados no território nacional»)
 2009/C 297/03
 Língua do processo: alemão
 Órgão jurisdicional de reenvio
 Finanzgericht Baden-Württemberg
 Partes no processo principal
 Recorrente: Grundstücksgemeinschaft Busley e Cibrian Fernandez
 Recorrido: Finanzamt Stuttgart-Körperschaften
 Objecto
 Pedido de decisão prejudicial — Finanzgericht Baden-Württemberg — Interpretação dos artigos 18.o e 56.o do Tratado CE — Regulamentação nacional em matéria de imposto sobre os rendimentos que limita a dedução das perdas resultantes da locação de imóveis às perdas relativas a bens situados em território nacional e aplicam exclusivamente a esses bens um regime de amortização mais favorável
 Dispositivo
 O artigo 56.o CE opõe-se à legislação de um Estado-Membro relativa ao imposto sobre o rendimento que subordina o direito de as pessoas singulares residentes e sujeitas à tributação global beneficiarem da dedução das perdas resultantes da locação de imóveis ao rendimento tributável no ano em que as perdas ocorrem e da aplicação de uma amortização regressiva na determinação dos rendimentos provenientes desse bem à condição de o mesmo se situar no território desse Estado-Membro.
 (1) JO C 92, de 12.4.2008.


text:
 14.7.2015
 IT
 Gazzetta ufficiale dell'Unione europea
 L 185/13
 REGOLAMENTO DI ESECUZIONE (UE) 2015/1138 DELLA COMMISSIONE
 del 13 luglio 2015
 recante fissazione dei valori forfettari all'importazione ai fini della determinazione del prezzo di entrata di taluni ortofrutticoli
 LA COMMISSIONE EUROPEA,
 visto il trattato sul funzionamento dell'Unione europea,
 visto il Regolamento (UE) n. 1308/2013 del Parlamento europeo e del Consiglio, del 17 dicembre 2013, recante organizzazione comune dei mercati dei prodotti agricoli e che abroga i regolamenti (CEE) n. 922/72, (CEE) n. 234/79, (CE) n. 1037/2001 e (CE) n. 1234/2007 del Consiglio (1),
 visto il regolamento di esecuzione (UE) n. 543/2011 della Commissione, del 7 giugno 2011, recante modalità di applicazione del regolamento (CE) n. 1234/2007 del Consiglio nei settori degli ortofrutticoli freschi e degli ortofrutticoli trasformati (2), in particolare l'articolo 136, paragrafo 1,
 considerando quanto segue:
 (1)
 Il regolamento di esecuzione (UE) n. 543/2011 prevede, in applicazione dei risultati dei negoziati commerciali multilaterali dell'Uruguay round, i criteri per la fissazione da parte della Commissione dei valori forfettari all'importazione dai paesi terzi, per i prodotti e i periodi indicati nell'allegato XVI, parte A, del medesimo regolamento.
 (2)
 Il valore forfettario all'importazione è calcolato ciascun giorno feriale, in conformità dell'articolo 136, paragrafo 1, del regolamento di esecuzione (UE) n. 543/2011, tenendo conto di dati giornalieri variabili. Pertanto il presente regolamento entra in vigore il giorno della pubblicazione nella Gazzetta ufficiale dell'Unione europea,
 HA ADOTTATO IL PRESENTE REGOLAMENTO:
 Articolo 1
 I valori forfettari all'importazione di cui all'articolo 136 del regolamento di esecuzione (UE) n. 543/2011 sono quelli fissati nell'allegato del presente regolamento.
 Articolo 2
 Il presente regolamento entra in vigore il giorno della pubblicazione nella Gazzetta ufficiale dell'Unione europea.
 Il presente regolamento è obbligatorio in tutti i suoi elementi e direttamente applicabile in ciascuno degli Stati membri.
 Fatto a Bruxelles, il 13 luglio 2015
 Per la Commissione,
 a nome del presidente
 Jerzy PLEWA
 Direttore generale dell'Agricoltura e dello sviluppo rurale
 (1) GU L 347 del 20.12.2013, pag. 671.
 (2) GU L 157 del 15.6.2011, pag. 1.
 ALLEGATO
 Valori forfettari all'importazione ai fini della determinazione del prezzo di entrata di taluni ortofrutticoli
 (EUR/100 kg)
 Codice NC
 Codice dei paesi terzi (1)
 Valore forfettario all'importazione
 0702 00 00
 MA
 160,9
 MK
 48,3
 ZZ
 104,6
 0707 00 05
 TR
 116,3
 ZZ
 116,3
 0709 93 10
 TR
 119,7
 ZZ
 119,7
 0805 50 10
 AR
 116,9
 TR
 108,0
 UY
 129,6
 ZA
 141,9
 ZZ
 124,1
 0808 10 80
 AR
 165,9
 BR
 99,3
 CL
 109,0
 NZ
 139,2
 US
 173,4
 UY
 162,0
 ZA
 116,7
 ZZ
 137,9
 0808 30 90
 AR
 174,9
 CL
 128,5
 CN
 86,2
 NZ
 272,8
 ZA
 129,3
 ZZ
 158,3
 0809 10 00
 TR
 238,8
 ZZ
 238,8
 0809 29 00
 TR
 250,3
 US
 493,3
 ZZ
 371,8
 0809 40 05
 BA
 87,0
 ZZ
 87,0
 (1) Nomenclatura dei paesi stabilita dal Regolamento (UE) n. 1106/2012 della Commissione, del 27 novembre 2012, che attua il regolamento (CE) n. 471/2009 del Parlamento europeo e del Consiglio, relativo alle statistiche comunitarie del commercio estero con i paesi terzi, per quanto riguarda l'aggiornamento della nomenclatura dei paesi e territori (GU L 328 del 28.11.2012, pag. 7). Il codice «ZZ» corrisponde a «altre origini».


type: contracts

text:
 22.12.2005
 PL
 Dziennik Urzędowy Unii Europejskiej
 L 339/12
 DECYZJA WSPÓLNEGO KOMITETU EOG
 NR 113/2005
 z dnia 30 września 2005 r.
 zmieniająca załącznik II (Przepisy techniczne, normy, badania i certyfikacja) do Porozumienia EOG
 WSPÓLNY KOMITET EOG,
 uwzględniając Porozumienie o Europejskim Obszarze Gospodarczym, zmienione Protokołem dostosowującym Porozumienie o Europejskim Obszarze Gospodarczym, dalej zwane „Porozumieniem”, w szczególności jego art. 98,
 a także mając na uwadze, co następuje:
 (1)
 Załącznik II do Porozumienia został zmieniony decyzją Wspólnego Komitetu EOG nr 107/2005 z dnia 8 lipca 2005 r. (1).
 (2)
 W Porozumieniu należy uwzględnić dyrektywę Komisji 2005/13/WE z dnia 21 lutego 2005 r. zmieniającą dyrektywę 2000/25/WE Parlamentu Europejskiego i Rady w zakresie emisji stałych i gazowych zanieczyszczeń pochodzących z silników napędzających ciągniki rolnicze lub leśne oraz zmieniającą załącznik I do dyrektywy 2003/37/WE Parlamentu Europejskiego i Rady w zakresie homologacji typu ciągników rolnych lub leśnych (2).
 (3)
 W rozdziale II załącznika II do Porozumienia należy wprowadzić odrębny punkt dla dyrektywy 2000/25/WE Parlamentu Europejskiego i Rady (3), która została już uwzględniona w Porozumieniu,
 STANOWI, CO NASTĘPUJE:
 Artykuł 1
 W rozdziale II załącznika II do Porozumienia wprowadza się następujące zmiany:
 1)
 w pkt 28 (dyrektywa 2003/37/WE Parlamentu Europejskiego i Rady) dodaje się tiret w brzmieniu:
 „—
 32005 L 0013: dyrektywą Komisji 2005/13/WE z dnia 21 lutego 2005 r. (Dz.U. L 55 z 1.3.2005, str. 35).”;
 2)
 po pkt 28 (dyrektywa 2003/37/WE Parlamentu Europejskiego i Rady) wprowadza się punkt w brzmieniu:
 „29.
 32000 L 0025: dyrektywa 2000/25/WE Parlamentu Europejskiego i Rady z dnia 22 maja 2000 r. w sprawie środków stosowanych przeciwko stałym i gazowym zanieczyszczeniom pochodzącym z silników napędzających ciągniki rolnicze lub leśne i zmieniająca dyrektywę Rady 74/150/EWG (Dz.U. L 173 z 12.7.2000, str. 1), zmieniona:
 —
 32005 L 0013: dyrektywą Komisji 2005/13/WE z dnia 21 lutego 2005 r. (Dz.U. L 55 z 1.3.2005, str. 35).”.
 Artykuł 2
 Teksty dyrektywy 2005/13/WE w językach islandzkim i norweskim, które zostaną opublikowane w Suplemencie EOG do Dziennika Urzędowego Unii Europejskiej, są autentyczne.
 Artykuł 3
 Niniejsza decyzja wchodzi w życie z dniem 1 października 2005 r., pod warunkiem że Wspólny Komitet EOG otrzyma wszystkie notyfikacje przewidziane w art. 103 ust. 1 Porozumienia (4).
 Artykuł 4
 Niniejsza decyzja zostaje opublikowana w Sekcji EOG oraz w Suplemencie EOG do Dziennika Urzędowego Unii Europejskiej.
 Sporządzono w Brukseli, dnia 30 września 2005 r.
 W imieniu Wspólnego Komitetu EOG
 HSH Prinz Nikolaus von LIECHTENSTEIN
 Przewodniczący
 (1) Dz.U. L 306 z 24.11.2005, str. 45.
 (2) Dz.U. L 55 z 1.3.2005, str. 35.
 (3) Dz.U. L 173 z 12.7.2000, str. 1.
 (4) Nie wskazano wymogów konstytucyjnych.


type: wikipedia

text:
Občina Izola - (ital.:) Comune d'Isola je ena od štirih istrskih občin v Republiki Sloveniji s središčem v Izoli (avtohtono ime Isola je v italijanščini »otok«), ki je s skoraj 3/4 prebivalstva občine daleč največje naselje.
 Naselja v občini
 Izola/Isola, Baredi, Cetore, Dobrava/Dobrava, Jagodje/Valleggia, Korte, Malija, Nožed, Šared.
 Krajevna skupnosti
 Občina Izola se dela na naslednje Krajevne skupnosti, med katerimi so tri v samem mestu:
 KS Korte (obsega 6 naselij v zaledju Izole v Šavrinskem gričevju)
 KS Jagodje-Dobrava
 KS Izola staro mesto
 KS Haliaetum
 KS Livade
 Županske volitve 2006
 Na lokalnih volitvah leta 2006 je po preštetju večine glasovnic za nekaj glasov vodil kandidat Tomislav Klokočovnik. Po prejetju glasovnic oddanih po pošti je za šest glasov prevzela vodstvo dotedanja županja Breda Pečan. Po pritožbah na sodišče in začasnem brezvladju (občino je vodil najstarejši svetnik) je občinska volilna komisija po razveljavitvi poročila o drugem krogu županskih volitev v Izoli, ponovno presojali glasovnice prispele po pošti in ugotovili, da je 12 glasovnic neveljavnih. Breda Pečan je tako prejela 4202 glasova, kandidat stranke Izola je naša Tomislav Klokočovnik pa 4208 glasov, s čimer je 9. januarja 2007 postal zmagovalec županskih volitev v Izoli.
 Županske volitve 2010
 Na lokalnih volitvah leta 2010 je zmagal Igor Kolenc, ki je v drugem krogu z 52 % glasov premagal protikandidata Tomislava Klokočovnika.
 Sklici
 Glej tudi
 Kocjančičeva nagrada
 Zunanje povezave
 Izola, uradna stran občine.
 www.izola.info, izolski spletni informacijski portal
 Izola.eu, Izola Toursim
 Izola


text:
 2.7.2014
 BG
 Официален вестник на Европейския съюз
 L 194/8
 РЕГЛАМЕНТ ЗА ИЗПЪЛНЕНИЕ (ЕС) No 730/2014 НА КОМИСИЯТА
 от 1 юли 2014 година
 за установяване на стандартни стойности при внос с цел определяне на входната цена на някои плодове и зеленчуци
 ЕВРОПЕЙСКАТА КОМИСИЯ,
 като взе предвид Договора за функционирането на Европейския съюз,
 като взе предвид Регламент (ЕО) No 1234/2007 на Съвета от 22 октомври 2007 г. за установяване на обща организация на селскостопанските пазари и относно специфични разпоредби за някои земеделски продукти (Общ регламент за ООП) (1),
 като взе предвид Регламент за изпълнение (ЕС) No 543/2011 на Комисията от 7 юни 2011 г. за определяне на подробни правила за прилагането на Регламент (ЕО) No 1234/2007 на Съвета по отношение на секторите на плодовете и зеленчуците и на преработените плодове и зеленчуци (2), и по-специално член 136, параграф 1 от него,
 като има предвид, че:
 (1)
 В изпълнение на резултатите от Уругвайския кръг на многостранните търговски преговори в Регламент за изпълнение (ЕС) No 543/2011 са посочени критериите, по които Комисията определя стандартните стойности при внос от трети държави за продуктите и периодите, посочени в приложение XVI, част A от същия регламент.
 (2)
 Стандартната стойност при внос се изчислява за всеки работен ден съгласно член 136, параграф 1 от Регламент за изпълнение (ЕС) No 543/2011, като се вземат под внимание променливите данни за всеки ден. В резултат на това настоящият регламент следва да влезе в сила в деня на публикуването му в Официален вестник на Европейския съюз,
 ПРИЕ НАСТОЯЩИЯ РЕГЛАМЕНТ:
 Член 1
 Стандартните стойности при внос, посочени в член 136 от Регламент за изпълнение (ЕС) No 543/2011, са определени в приложението към настоящия регламент.
 Член 2
 Настоящият регламент влиза в сила в деня на публикуването му в Официален вестник на Европейския съюз.
 Настоящият регламент е задължителен в своята цялост и се прилага пряко във всички държави членки.
 Съставено в Брюксел на 1 юли 2014 година.
 За Комисията,
 от името на председателя,
 Jerzy PLEWA
 Генерален директор на генерална дирекция „Земеделие и развитие на селските райони“
 (1) ОВ L 299, 16.11.2007 г., стр. 1.
 (2) ОВ L 157, 15.6.2011 г., стр. 1.
 ПРИЛОЖЕНИЕ
 Стандартни стойности при внос за определяне на входната цена на някои плодове и зеленчуци
 (EUR/100 kg)
 Код по КН
 Код на третa държавa (1)
 Стандартна стойност при внос
 0702 00 00
 MK
 66,3
 TR
 88,4
 XS
 59,1
 ZZ
 71,3
 0707 00 05
 MK
 32,3
 TR
 78,2
 ZZ
 55,3
 0709 93 10
 TR
 109,2
 ZZ
 109,2
 0805 50 10
 AR
 109,4
 BO
 136,6
 TR
 107,6
 UY
 127,1
 ZA
 119,1
 ZZ
 120,0
 0808 10 80
 AR
 115,4
 BR
 78,2
 CL
 103,5
 NZ
 130,2
 US
 144,9
 ZA
 132,3
 ZZ
 117,4
 0809 10 00
 TR
 215,6
 ZZ
 215,6
 0809 29 00
 TR
 307,8
 ZZ
 307,8
 0809 30
 TR
 149,8
 XS
 54,4
 ZZ
 102,1
 (1) Номенклатура на държавите, определена с Регламент (ЕО) No 1833/2006 на Комисията (ОВ L 354, 14.12.2006 г., стр. 19). Код „ZZ“ означава „с друг произход“.


jurisdiction: US

text:
 One Hundred Tenth Congress of the United States of
 America
 2d SessionBegun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday, the third
 day of January, two thousand and eight
 S. 2840
 IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED
 STATES
 AN ACT
 To establish a liaison with the Federal
 Bureau of Investigation in United States Citizenship and Immigration Services
 to expedite naturalization applications filed by members of the Armed Forces
 and to establish a deadline for processing such applications.
 1.Short titleThis Act may be cited as the
 Military Personnel Citizenship
 Processing Act.
 2.Office of the FBI Liaison
 (a)EstablishmentSection 451 of the Homeland Security Act of
 2002 (6 U.S.C. 271) is amended by adding at the end the following:
 (g)Office of the FBI Liaison
 (1)In generalThere shall be an Office of the FBI Liaison
 in the Department of Homeland Security.
 (2)FunctionsThe Office of the FBI Liaison shall monitor
 the progress of the functions of the Federal Bureau of Investigation in the
 naturalization process to assist in the expeditious completion of all such
 functions pertaining to naturalization applications filed by, or on behalf
 of—
 (A)current or former members of the Armed
 Forces under section 328 or 329 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8
 U.S.C. 1439 and 1440);
 (B)current spouses of United States citizens
 who are currently serving on active duty in the Armed Forces, who qualify for
 naturalization under section 319(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8
 U.S.C. 1430(b)), and surviving spouses and children who qualify for
 naturalization under section 319(d) of such Act; or
 (C)a deceased individual who is eligible for
 posthumous citizenship under section 329A of the Immigration and Nationality
 Act (8 U.S.C. 1440–1).
 (3)Authorization of
 appropriationsThere are
 authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be necessary to carry out this
 subsection.
 .
 (b)RulemakingNot later than 180 days after the date of
 the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation
 with the Attorney General, shall promulgate rules to carry out the amendment
 made by subsection (a).
 3.Deadline for processing and adjudicating
 naturalization applications filed by current or former members of the Armed
 Forces and their spouses and children
 (a)In generalSection 328 of the Immigration and
 Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1439) is amended by adding at the end the
 following:
 (g)Not later than 6 months after receiving an
 application for naturalization filed by a current member of the Armed Forces
 under subsection (a), section 329(a), or section 329A, by the spouse of such
 member under section 319(b), or by a surviving spouse or child under section
 319(d), United States Citizenship and Immigration Services shall—
 (1)process and adjudicate the application,
 including completing all required background checks to the satisfaction of the
 Secretary of Homeland Security; or
 (2)provide the applicant with—
 (A)an explanation for its inability to meet
 the processing and adjudication deadline under this subsection; and
 (B)an estimate of the date by which the
 application will be processed and adjudicated.
 (h)The Director of United States Citizenship
 and Immigration Services shall submit an annual report to the Subcommittee on
 Immigration, Border Security, and Refugees and the Subcommittee on Homeland
 Security of the Senate and the Subcommittee on Immigration, Citizenship,
 Refugees, Border Security, and International Law and the Subcommittee on
 Homeland Security of the House of Representatives that identifies every
 application filed under subsection (a), subsection (b) or (d) of section 319,
 section 329(a), or section 329A that is not processed and adjudicated within 1
 year after it was filed due to delays in conducting required background
 checks.
 .
 (b)GAO reportNot later than 180 days after the date of
 the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General shall submit a report to
 Congress that contains the results of a study regarding the average length of
 time taken by United States Citizenship and Immigration Services to process and
 adjudicate applications for naturalization filed by members of the Armed
 Forces, deceased members of the Armed Forces, and their spouses and
 children.
 4.Sunset provisionThis Act and the amendments made by this Act
 are repealed on the date that is 5 years after the date of the enactment of
 this Act.
 Speaker of the House of Representatives
 Vice President of the United States and President of the
 Senate


type: other

text:
À propos de l'arrêt de la CIJ relatif aux excepti...
 http://id.erudit.org/iderudit/704128ar adresse copiéeune erreur s'est produite
 10.7202/704128aradresse copiéeune erreur s'est produite
 En dehors des développements récents de « l'affaire de Lockerbie », la Cour internationale de Justice (CIJ), dans son arrêt du 28.02.1998 relatif aux exceptions préliminaires, s'est prononcée sur sa propre compétence et sur la recevabilité de la requête libyenne. La problématique globale de ce travail va au-delà de l'analyse des questions juridiques, évoquées lors de l'instruction de cette affaire, pour soulever la finalité du jugement de la Cour. La démarche multidisciplinaire (philosophique, juridique et politique) permet, d'une part, de recadrer le contexte du différend entre le demandeur (la Libye) et les défendeurs des États-Unis et le Royaume-Uni) et relate, d'autre part, l'une des fonctions de la CIJ à savoir l'application du droit et la contribution au maintien de la paix et de la sécurité internationales. Derrière ce procès et cet arrêt, s'esquisse la détermination de la Cour à évincer l'utilisation de la force ou de la violence dans la solution dudit différend. Plus encore, l'arrêt rendu par la CIJ consiste à neutraliser l'éventualité d'un recours à « la justice vengeance » par les défendeurs.
 Hamdouni, Saïd. « À propos de l'arrêt de la CIJ relatif aux exceptions préliminaires de l'incident aérien de Lockerbie (Note). » Études internationales, volume 31, numéro 1, 2000, p. 91–110. doi:10.7202/704128ar
 Hamdouni, S. (2000). À propos de l'arrêt de la CIJ relatif aux exceptions préliminaires de l'incident aérien de Lockerbie (Note). Études internationales, 31(1), 91–110. doi:10.7202/704128ar
 Hamdouni, Saïd. « À propos de l'arrêt de la CIJ relatif aux exceptions préliminaires de l'incident aérien de Lockerbie (Note) ». Études internationales 31, no 1 (2000) : 91–110. doi:10.7202/704128ar


text:
Jurisprudentie (2157)
 Gerechtshoven (749)
 Uitspraken (301)
 Arnhem-Leeuwarden (108)
 Uitspraken (104)
 Uitspraken (162)
 Hoge instanties (1008)
 Advocaat-Generaal (284)
 Advocaat-Generaal Hof van Justitie van de EU (27)
 Hof van Justitie van de EU (88)
 Hoge Raad (608)
 Rechtbanken (400)
 Formeel belastingrecht (81)
 Pensioen en lijfrente (21)
 Schenken en erven (24)
 Vennootschapsbelasting (2734)
 Waarderingsvoorschriften pensioen niet strijdig met goed koopmansgebruik of artikel 1 EP
 VPB - Uitspraak Hof Amsterdam - 19/00060 - ECLI:NL:GHAMS:2020:1923 - 07-07-2020
 GERECHTSHOF AMSTERDAMkenmerk 19/000607 juli 2020uitspraak van de derde meervoudige belastingkamerop het hoger beroep van[X BV] , gevestigd te [Z] , belanghebbende,tegen de uitspraak van 17 december 2018 in de zaak met kenmerk HAA 17/1087 van de rechtbank Noord-Holland (hierna: de rechtbank) in het ...
 'Triple dip'-structuur / renteaftrek, toepassing artikel 10a Wet VpB 1969
 VPB - Arrest Hoge Raad - 19/05112 - ECLI:NL:PHR:2020:672 - 24-07-2020
 PROCUREUR-GENERAALBIJ DEHOGE RAAD DER NEDERLANDENNummer 19/05112Datum 3 juli 2020Belastingkamer AOnderwerp/tijdvak Vennootschapsbelasting 1 januari 2009-31 december 2010Nrs. Gerechtshof BK-17/00943 t/m 17/00945Nrs. Rechtbank 16/4632 t/m 16/4634CONCLUSIEP.J. Wattelin de zaak vande Staatssecretaris v...
 Toepassing innovatiebox op grond van vaststellingsovereenkomst
 VPB - Uitspraak Rechtbank Noord-Holland - 19/2806 en 19/2807 - ECLI:NL:RBNHO:2020:5448 - 13-07-2020
 Rechtbank Noord-HollandZittingsplaats HaarlemBestuursrechtzaaknummers: HAA 19/2806 en 19/2807uitspraak van de meervoudige kamer van 13 juli 2020 in de zaken tussen[X] B.V., gevestigd te [Z] , eiseres,(gemachtigde: drs. A.G. Jimmink),ende inspecteur van de Belastingdienst, kantoor Amsterdam, verweer...
 Vergoeding wegens niet ontvangen aandelenpakket / geen deelnemingsvrijsteling
 VPB - Arrest Hoge Raad - 18/03268 - ECLI:NL:HR:2020:1270 - 10-07-2020
 HOGE RAAD DER NEDERLANDENBELASTINGKAMERNummer 18/03268Datum 10 juli 2020ARRESTin de zaak van[X] B.V. te [Z] (hierna: belanghebbende)tegende STAATSSECRETARIS VAN FINANCIËNop het beroep in cassatie tegen de uitspraak van het Gerechtshof Arnhem-Leeuwarden van 19 juni 2018, nr. 16/00475, op het hoger b...
 VPB - Uitspraak Hof Arnhem-Leeuwarden - 19/00905 - ECLI:NL:GHARL:2020:5098 - 30-06-2020
 GERECHTSHOF ARNHEM - LEEUWARDENlocatie Arnhemnummer 19/00905uitspraakdatum: 30 juni 2020Uitspraak van de derde meervoudige belastingkamerop het hoger beroep van[X] B.V. te [Z] (hierna: belanghebbende)tegen de uitspraak van de rechtbank Gelderland van 5 juni 2019, nummer AWB 18/4315, ECLI:NL:RBGEL:2...
 VPB - Uitspraak Rechtbank Gelderland - 19/4102 - ECLI:NL:RBGEL:2020:3042 - 22-06-2020
 RECHTBANK GELDERLANDZittingsplaats ArnhemBelastingrechtzaaknummer: AWB 19/4102uitspraak van de enkelvoudige belastingkamer vanin de zaak tussen[eiseres] B.V., te [plaats] , eiseres(gemachtigde: mr. [gemachtigde] ,ende inspecteur van de Belastingdienst, kantoor Utrecht, verweerder.ProcesverloopVerwe...
 Geen afwaardering vordering op voormalige deelneming / onzakelijke lening
 VPB - Uitspraak Hof Arnhem-Leeuwarden - 19/00321 - ECLI:NL:GHARL:2020:4742 - 23-06-2020
 GERECHTSHOF ARNHEM - LEEUWARDENlocatie Arnhemnummer 19/00321uitspraakdatum: 23 juni 2020Uitspraak van de tweede meervoudige belastingkamerop het hoger beroep van[X] B.V. te [Z] (hierna: belanghebbende)tegen de uitspraak van de rechtbank Gelderland van 8 februari 2019, nummer AWB 17/1433, ECLI:NL:RB...
 Het verbreken van de aandeelhoudersrelatie brengt niet met zich dat een onzakelijke lening alsnog zakelijk wordt
 VPB - Uitspraak Hof Arnhem-Leeuwarden - 19/00321 - ECLI:NL:GHARL:2020:4742 - 03-07-2020
 Ontvoeging uit fiscale eenheid / geen kwijtscheldingswinstvrijstelling
 VPB - Uitspraak Hof Arnhem-Leeuwarden - 19/00332 - ECLI:NL:GHARL:2020:4459 - 16-06-2020
 GERECHTSHOF ARNHEM - LEEUWARDENlocatie Arnhemnummer 19/00332uitspraakdatum: 16 juni 2020Uitspraak van de derde meervoudige belastingkamerop het hoger beroep van[X] B.V. te [Z] (hierna: belanghebbende)tegen de uitspraak van de rechtbank Gelderland van 6 februari 2019, nummer AWB 18/3831, in het gedi...
 Beroep op kwijtscheldingswinstvrijstelling binnen zes jaren na ontvoeging uit fiscale eenheid. Tegenbewijsregeling.


text:
 109 HRES 374 IH: Recognizing the 75th anniversary of the death of Glenn Hammond Curtiss and supporting the establishment of Glenn Hammond Curtiss Day to recognize his innovative spirit and legacy.
 U.S. House of Representatives
 2005-07-21
 text/xml
 EN
 Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.
 IV
 109th CONGRESS
 1st Session
 H. RES. 374
 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 July 21, 2005
 Mr. Kuhl of New York (for himself, Mr. Boehlert, Mr. Lewis of California, Mr. McCaul of Texas, Mr. English of Pennsylvania, Mr. Davis of Kentucky, Mr. Brown of South Carolina, Mr. Simmons, Mr. Graves, Mr. Doolittle, Mr. Shuster, Ms. Millender-McDonald, Mr. Calvert, Mr. Aderholt, Mr. Lewis of Georgia, Mr. Duncan, Mr. Fossella, Mr. Walsh, Ms. Ginny Brown-Waite of Florida, Mr. Westmoreland, Mr. Sherwood, Mrs. Drake, Mr. Kirk, Mr. Manzullo, Mr. Price of Georgia, Mr. Marchant, Mr. Holden, Mr. Conaway, Mr. Case, Mr. Higgins, Mr. Boustany, Mr. Engel, Mrs. Kelly, Mr. Jenkins, Mr. Kennedy of Minnesota, Mr. Salazar, Mr. Reynolds, Mr. King of New York, Mr. Sweeney, Mr. Hall, Miss McMorris, Mr. Pombo, Mr. Ehlers, Mr. Garrett of New Jersey, and Ms. Corrine Brown of Florida) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform
 RESOLUTION
 Recognizing the 75th anniversary of the death of Glenn Hammond Curtiss and supporting the establishment of Glenn Hammond Curtiss Day to recognize his innovative spirit and legacy.
 Whereas Glenn Hammond Curtiss was born in Hammondsport, New York, in 1878;
 Whereas, in 1907, Glenn Hammond Curtiss became the fastest man on earth by attaining the speed of 136 miles per hour on a motorcycle;
 Whereas Glenn Hammond Curtiss developed the first successful seaplane, and he manufactured the famous Curtiss JN-4D (commonly known as the Jenny), a training plane used during World War I;
 Whereas, in 1911, Glenn Hammond Curtiss became known as the father of naval aviation, and, by 1921, he was considered the founder of the American aircraft industry; and
 Whereas July 23, 2005, is the 75th anniversary of the death of Glenn Hammond Curtiss: Now, therefore, be it
 That the House of Representatives—
 (1)recognizes the historical significance of the 75th anniversary of the death of Glenn Hammond Curtiss; and
 (2)supports the establishment of Glenn Hammond Curtiss Day to recognize the innovative spirit and legacy of Glenn Hammond Curtiss, his willingness to work for the common good, and his contributions to motorcycle design and racing, to naval aviation, and to the American aircraft industry.


text:
 |
 52011PC0295
 EIROPAS PARLAMENTA UN PADOMES REGULA par euro monētu emisiju Priekšlikums EIROPAS PARLAMENTA UN PADOMES REGULA par euro monētu emisiju /* COM/2011/0295 galīgā redakcija - COD 2011/0131 */
 2011/0131 (COD)
 Priekšlikums
 EIROPAS PARLAMENTA UN PADOMES REGULA
 par euro monētu emisiju
 EIROPAS PARLAMENTS UN EIROPAS
 SAVIENĪBAS PADOME,
 ņemot vērā Līgumu par
 Eiropas Savienības darbību un jo īpaši tā 133. pantu,
 ņemot
 vērā Eiropas Komisijas priekšlikumu,
 ņemot
 vērā Eiropas Centrālās bankas atzinumu,
 pēc tiesību akta projekta
 nosūtīšanas valstu parlamentiem,
 saskaņā
 ar parasto leģislatīvo procedūru,
 tā kā:
 (1)
 Padomes 1998. gada 23. novembra un
 2002. gada 5. novembra Secinājumos par kolekcionāriem
 paredzētajām monētām, Komisijas 2008. gada
 19. decembra Ieteikumā 2009/23/EK par kopīgām
 pamatnostādnēm attiecībā uz apgrozībai paredzēto
 euro monētu emisiju un to valsts pusēm[1],
 kuru Padome apstiprināja 2009. gada 10. decembra
 secinājumos, un Komisijas 2010. gada 22. marta Ieteikumā
 2010/191/ES par euro banknošu un monētu likumīgā
 maksāšanas līdzekļa statusa darbības jomu un ietekmi[2] sniegti ieteikumi par vēlamo praksi
 attiecībā uz kolekcionāriem paredzētajām euro monētām,
 apgrozībai paredzētu euro monētu, tostarp piemiņas
 monētu, emisiju un apspriešanos pirms apgrozībai derīgu euro monētu
 iznīcināšanas.
 (2)
 Tas, ka nav saistošu noteikumu par euro monētu
 emisiju, var izvērsties atšķirīgā praksē
 dažādās dalībvalstīs un nenodrošina kopīgajai
 valūtai pietiekami integrētus pamatus. Rūpējoties par
 tiesisko pārredzamību un noteiktību, nepieciešams ieviest
 saistošus euro monētu emisijas noteikumus.
 (3)
 Saskaņā ar Padomes 1998. gada
 3. maija Regulu (EK) Nr. 974/98 par euro ieviešanu[3] monētām euro un centu
 denominācijā, ja tās atbilst Padomes noteiktajām
 denominācijām un tehniskajiem datiem, ir likumīga
 maksāšanas līdzekļa statuss visās „iesaistītajās
 dalībvalstīs”, kā tas noteikts minētajā regulā. To
 denominācijas un tehniskos datus nosaka Padomes 1998. gada
 3. maija Regula (EK) Nr. 975/98 par apgrozībai paredzēto
 eiro monētu denominācijām un tehniskajiem datiem[4].
 (4)
 Bez parastajām apgrozībai
 paredzētajām euro monētām dalībvalstis
 drīkst emitēt arī apgrozībai paredzētas euro piemiņas
 monētas īpašu notikumu atzīmēšanai, ierobežojot šādu
 monētu emisiju līdz vienam komplektam gadā vienā
 emitēšanas dalībvalstī. Turklāt ir jānosaka
 konkrēti apjoma ierobežojumi apgrozībai paredzēto piemiņas
 monētu emisijai, lai nodrošinātu, ka šādas monētas aizvien
 veido procentuāli nelielu daļu no kopējā
 apgrozībā esošo divu euro monētu kopskaita. Vienlaikus
 saskaņā ar minētajiem daudzuma ierobežojumiem jāļauj
 emitēt pietiekamu monētu daudzumu, lai nodrošinātu efektīvu
 piemiņas monētu apgrozību.
 (5)
 Dalībvalstīm būtu jābūt
 arī iespējai emitēt kolekcionāriem paredzētas euro monētas,
 kas nav paredzētas apgrozībai un kam būtu jābūt viegli
 atšķiramām no apgrozībai paredzētām euro monētām.
 Euro kolekcijas monētām būtu jābūt
 likumīga maksāšanas līdzekļa statusam tikai emisijas
 dalībvalstī, un to emisijas nolūkam nevajadzētu būt
 laišanai apgrozībā.
 (6)
 Lai nodrošinātu, ka euro kolekcijas
 monētas netiek jauktas ar apgrozībai paredzētajām euro
 monētām, tām vajadzētu būt pamanāmi
 atšķirīgām no pēdējām. Turklāt ir
 lietderīgi noteikt, ka kolekcijas euro monētu emisijas
 jāiekļauj monētu kopējā apjomā, kas
 jāapstiprina Eiropas Centrālajai bankai (ECB), taču
 apkopotā veidā, nevis katrai emisijai atsevišķi.
 (7)
 Ir lietderīgi un atbilstoši iesaistīto
 dalībvalstu vispārējai praksei, ka apgrozībai
 paredzētās euro monētas, tostarp apgrozībai
 paredzētās piemiņas monētas, būtu jālaiž
 apgrozībā ar nominālvērtību, izņemot nelielu
 daudzumu monētu, ko drīkst pārdot par augstāku cenu, ja
 tām piemīt īpaša kvalitāte vai tās ir īpaši
 iesaiņotas.
 (8)
 Lai novērstu, ka derīgas apgrozībai
 paredzētas euro monētas kādā dalībvalstī tiek
 iznīcinātas, lai gan citā dalībvalstī tās
 varētu būt vajadzīgas, dalībvalstīm pirms monētu
 iznīcināšanas būtu jāapspriežas citai ar citu,
 IR PIEŅĒMUSI ŠO REGULU.
 1. pants
 Darbības
 joma
 Šī regula nosaka apgrozībai
 paredzēto euro monētu, tostarp apgrozībai paredzēto
 piemiņas monētu, emisiju, kolekcijas euro monētu emisiju un
 apspriešanos pirms derīgu euro monētu iznīcināšanas.
 2. pants
 Definīcijas
 Šajā regulā piemēro šādas
 definīcijas:
 1. "Apgrozībai paredzētās
 euro monētas" ir tādas apgrozībai paredzētas euro
 monētas, kuru denominācijas un tehniskie dati noteikti Padomes
 1998. gada 3. maija Regulā (EK) Nr. 975/98.
 2. "Apgrozībai paredzētās
 piemiņas euro monētas" ir apgrozībai paredzētas euro
 monētas, kas veltītas īpašam tematam, kā noteikts Padomes
 Regulas (EK) Nr. 975/98 1.f pantā.
 3. "Euro kolekcijas monētas" ir
 kolekcijām paredzētas euro monētas un nav paredzētas
 laišanai apgrozībā.
 3. pants
 Euro
 monētu tipi
 Dalībvalstis var
 emitēt divu tipu euro monētas: apgrozībai paredzētas euro
 monētas, tostarp piemiņas euro monētas, un euro kolekcijas
 monētas.
 4. pants
 Apgrozībai
 paredzēto euro monētu emisija
 1. Euro monētas
 emitē ar nominālvērtību.
 2. Atkāpjoties
 no 1. punkta, nelielu monētu daudzumu, kas nepārsniedz 5 % no
 emitēto euro monētu kopējās vērtības un apjoma,
 var emitēt ar vērtību, kas ir augstāka par
 nominālvērtību, ja tas ir pamatots ar īpašu kvalitāti
 vai īpašu iesaiņojumu.
 5. pants
 Apgrozībai
 paredzēto piemiņas euro monētu emisija
 1. Ikviena iesaistītā
 dalībvalsts var emitēt tikai vienu apgrozībai paredzētu
 piemiņas euro monētu gadā, izņemot šādus
 gadījumus:
 a) apgrozībai paredzētās
 piemiņas euro monētas kopīgi emitē visas
 iesaistītās dalībvalstis;
 b) apgrozībai paredzētu
 piemiņas euro monētu emitē, ja valsts vadītāja vakance
 ir brīva uz pagaidu laiku vai šādus pienākumus pilda pagaidu
 vadītājs.
 2. Katrā emisijas reizē
 emitētais monētu kopskaits nepārsniedz šādas divas
 robežvērtības:
 a) 0,1 % no visu iesaistīto
 dalībvalstu apgrozībā laistā divu euro monētu
 kopskaita līdz tā gada sākumam, kas ir pirms
 attiecīgās piemiņas monētas emisijas gada; šo
 robežvērtību var paaugstināt līdz 2,0 % no visu
 iesaistīto dalībvalstu apgrozībā laistā divu euro
 monētu kopskaita, ja tiek atzīmēts vispārēji un
 simboliski svarīgs notikums; šādā gadījumā emisijas
 dalībvalsts atsakās turpmākajos četros gados emitēt
 vēl vienu apgrozībai paredzētu piemiņas monētu un
 izmantot paaugstināto robežvērtību un izklāsta iemeslus,
 kādēļ tā izvēlējusies paaugstināto
 robežvērtību;
 b) 5,0 % no attiecīgās emisijas
 dalībvalsts apgrozībā laistā 2 euro monētu
 kopskaita līdz tā gada sākumam, kas ir pirms
 attiecīgās piemiņas monētas emisijas gada;
 3. Apgrozībai paredzēto
 piemiņas euro monētu emisiju, tajā piedaloties visām
 iesaistītajām dalībvalstīm, apstiprina Eurogrupa.
 6. pants
 Euro
 kolekcijas monētu emisija
 1. Euro kolekcijas
 monētām ir maksāšanas līdzekļa statuss tikai tajā
 dalībvalstī, kas tās emitējusi.
 Emisijas
 dalībvalsts identitāte ir skaidri un viegli saskatāma uz
 monētas.
 2. Lai euro kolekcijas
 monētas varētu viegli atšķirt no apgrozībai
 paredzētajām euro monētām, tās atbilst visiem
 turpmāk minētajiem kritērijiem:
 a) to
 nominālvērtība ir atšķirīga no apgrozībai
 paredzēto euro monētu nominālvērtības;
 b) uz tām nav
 attēlu, kas līdzinātos apgrozībai paredzēto
 monētu kopīgajai pusei vai kādai no apgrozībai
 paredzēto monētu valsts pusei;
 c) to krāsa,
 diametrs un svars vai vismaz divi no šiem trim parametriem ievērojami
 atšķiras no apgrozībai paredzētajām euro monētām;
 atšķirību uzskata par ievērojamu, ja vērtības
 līdz ar pielaidi ir ārpus pielaides diapazona, kas noteikts
 apgrozībai paredzētajām euro monētām;
 d) tām nav
 smalki viļņotas vai dziļi rievotas monētas jostas.
 3. Euro monētas
 var emitēt ar nominālvērtību vai virs tās.
 4. Euro kolekcijas
 monētu emisiju ņem vērā, apkopojot monētu emisijas
 apjomu, kas jāapstiprina ECB.
 5.
 Dalībvalstis veic visus piemērotos pasākumus, lai novērstu
 euro kolekcijas monētu lietošanu par maksāšanas līdzekli,
 piemēram, izmantojot īpašo iepakojumu, autentifikācijas
 sertifikātu, emitētājas iestādes iepriekšēju
 paziņojumu vai emisiju virs nominālvērtības.
 7. pants
 Apspriešanās pirms apgrozībai paredzēto euro monētu
 iznīcināšanas
 Pirms tādu apgrozībai paredzētu
 euro monētu iznīcināšanas, kas nav apgrozībai
 nepiemērotas euro monētas Regulas (ES) Nr. 1210/2010[5] 2. panta b) punkta nozīmē,
 dalībvalstis savstarpēji apspriežas ar Ekonomikas un finanšu
 komitejas kompetentās apakškomitejas starpniecību un informē
 iesaistīto dalībvalstu (Padomes Regulas (EK) Nr. 974/98[6] nozīmē) naudas kaltuvju
 direktorus.
 8. pants
 Stāšanās
 spēkā
 Šī regula stājas spēkā
 divdesmitajā dienā pēc tās publicēšanas Eiropas
 Savienības Oficiālajā Vēstnesī.
 Šī regula uzliek saistības
 kopumā un ir tieši piemērojama visās dalībvalstīs
 saskaņā ar Līgumiem.
 Briselē,
 Eiropas Parlamenta vārdā — Padomes
 vārdā —
 priekšsēdētājs priekšsēdētājs
 [1] OV L 9, 14.1.2009.,
 52. lpp.
 [2] OV L 83, 30.3.2010.,
 70. lpp.
 [3] OV L 139, 11.5.1998.,
 1. lpp.
 [4] OV L 139, 11.5.1998., 6. lpp.
 [5] OV L 339, 22.12.2010., 1. lpp.
 [6] OV L 139, 11.5.1998.,
 1. lpp.


text:
C 348/20 ES Diario Oficial de las Comunidades Europeas 8.12.2001
 Recurso interpuesto el 17 de octubre de 2001 contra la principio general de transparencia, en la medida en que
 República Italiana por la Comisión de las Comunidades permite subdividir los criterios objetivos de evaluación de las
 Europeas ofertas en subgrupos antes de la apertura de los sobres.
 Finalmente, la Comisión sostiene que la República Italiana ha
 incurrido, además, en una infracción del artı́culo 44, apar-
 (Asunto C-412/01) tado 2, de la Directiva al haber omitido comunicarle la
 aprobación del DPCM no 116/97.
 (2001/C 348/35)
 (1) DO L 209 de 24.7.1992, p. 1.
 En el Tribunal de Justicia de las Comunidades Europeas se ha
 presentado el 17 de octubre de 2001 un recurso contra
 la República Italiana formulado por la Comisión de las
 Comunidades Europeas, representada por el Sr. Michel Nolin,
 en calidad de agente, asistido por el Sr. Massimo Moretto, Recurso interpuesto el 17 de octubre de 2001 contra el
 abogado. Reino de España por la Comisión de las Comunidades
 Europeas
 (Asunto C-414/01)
 La parte demandante solicita al Tribunal de Justicia que:
 (2001/C 348/36)
 — Declare que la República Italiana ha incumplido las
 obligaciones que le incumben en virtud de la Directiva
 92/50/CEE y, en particular, de los artı́culos 23, 32, 36 y
 44 de esta misma Directiva, al haber establecido en el En el Tribunal de Justicia de las Comunidades Europeas se ha
 artı́culo 2 del Decreto del Presidente del Consejo de presentado el 17 de octubre de 2001 un recurso contra el Reino
 Ministros no 116, de 27 de febrero de 1997, mediante la de España formulado por la Comisión de las Comunidades
 remisión al artı́culo 14 del Decreto legislativo no 157, de Europeas, representado por la Sra. I. Martı́nez del Peral, en
 17 de marzo de 1995, entre los criterios de adjudicación calidad de agente, que designa como domicilio en Luxemburgo
 que las entidades adjudicadoras podrán tener en cuenta el del Sr. L. Escobar, miembre del servicio jurı́dica, Centre
 para determinar la oferta económicamente más ventajosa, Wagner C 254.
 los criterios de selección cualitativa enumerados en el
 artı́culo 32 de la Directiva 92/50/CEE (1) y al haber
 indicado asimismo entre los criterios de adjudicación el La parte demandante solicita al Tribunal de Justicia que:
 certificado de calidad y «los demás datos que hayan
 podido mencionar las entidades adjudicadoras con el fin — declare que, al no haber adoptado las disposiciones
 de calificar en concreto al licitador con referencia al legales, reglamentarias y administrativas necesarias para
 servicio objeto del contrato», al haber previsto además la dar cumplimiento a lo dispuesto en la Directiva
 posibilidad de subdividir los criterios de evaluación de las 97/7/CE (1) del Parlamento europeo y del Consejo, de
 ofertas en subgrupos antes de la apertura de las plicas, y 20 de mayo de 1997, relativa a la protección de los
 al haber omitido comunicar a la Comisión el texto del consumidores en materia de contratos a distancia, o, en
 DPCM no 116/97. cualquier caso, al no haber comunicado la adopción de
 dichas disposiciones a la Comisión, el Reino de España
 — Condene a la República Italiana al pago de las costas del ha incumplido las obligaciones que le incumben en virtud
 procedimiento. del apartado 1 del Artı́culo 15 de dicha Directiva;
 — condene en costas al Reino de España.
 Motivos y principales alegaciones
 Motivos y principales alegaciones
 La Comisión afirma que las disposiciones que se impugnan del De acuerdo con el apartado 1 del artı́culo 15 de la Directiva
 DPCM no 116/97 contravienen manifiestamente la Directiva 97/7/CE, el Reino de España debió adoptar las medidas
 92/50, en la medida en que prevén asimismo la aplicación de necesarias para cumplir con la misma a más tardar el 4 de
 criterios de evaluación relativos a la capacidad técnica de los junio de 2000.
 licitadores en el momento de la evaluación de la oferta
 económicamente más ventajosa, confundiendo de esta forma
 la fase de la selección cualitativa con la de la adjudicación. Por (1) DO L 144 de 4.6.1997, p. 19.
 otra parte, la Comisión afirma que el DPCM de que se trata
 infringe el artı́culo 36, apartado 2, de la Directiva y viola el


text:
 25.8.2014
 BG
 Официален вестник на Европейския съюз
 C 282/51
 Жалба, подадена на 30 юни 2014 г. — Bodegas Muga/Комисия
 (Дело T-491/14)
 2014/C 282/67
 Език на производството: испански
 Страни
 Жалбоподател: Bodegas Muga, SL (Аро, Испания) (представители: J. L. Buendía Sierra, E. Abad Valdenebro, R. Calvo Salinero и A. Lamadrid de Pablo, abogados)
 Ответник: Европейска комисия
 Искания на жалбоподателя
 Жалбоподателят иска от Общия съд:
 —
 да отмени обжалваното решение, доколкото то квалифицира съвкупността от мерки, които според посоченото в него съставляват испанската система за финансов лизинг (ИСФЛ), като нова и несъвместима с вътрешния пазар държавна помощ,
 —
 при условията на евентуалност, да отмени членове 1 и 4 от обжалваното решение, които определят инвеститорите от обединенията по икономически интереси (ОИИ) като бенефициери на предполагаемите помощи и като единствени адресати на разпореждането за възстановяване,
 —
 при условията на евентуалност, да отмени член 4 от обжалваното решение, доколкото с него се разпорежда възстановяването на предполагаемите помощи в нарушение на общите принципи на правото на ЕС,
 —
 във всеки случай, да отмени член 4 от обжалваното решение, доколкото той се произнася относно законосъобразността на частноправни договори между инвеститорите и други образувания, и
 —
 да осъди Комисията да заплати съдебните разноски по това производство.
 Правни основания и основни доводи
 Правните основания и основните доводи са същите като вече изложените по дело T-700/13, Bankia/Комисия.


text:
 15.12.2014
 HR
 Službeni list Europske unije
 C 448/34
 Tužba podnesena 10. listopada 2014. – Tri Ocean Energy protiv Vijeća
 (Predmet T-719/14)
 (2014/C 448/43)
 Jezik postupka: engleski
 Stranke
 Tužitelj: Tri Ocean Energy (Kairo, Egipat) (zastupnici: P. Saini, QC, B. Kennelly, barrister, i N. Sheikh, solicitor)
 Tuženik: Vijeće Europske unije
 Tužbeni zahtjev
 Tužitelj od Općeg suda zahtijeva da:
 —
 poništi Provedbenu odluku Vijeća 2014/678/ZVSP od 26. rujna 2014. o provedbi Odluke 2013/255/ZVSP o mjerama ograničavanja protiv Sirije i Provedbenu uredbu Vijeća (EU) br. 1013/2014 od 26. rujna 2014. o provedbi Uredbe (EU) br. 36/2012 o mjerama ograničavanja s obzirom na stanje u Siriji, u mjeri u kojoj se one odnose na tužitelja; i
 —
 naloži tuženiku snošenje troškova tužitelja.
 Tužbeni razlozi i glavni argumenti
 U prilog osnovanosti tužbe tužitelj ističe pet tužbenih razloga.
 1.
 Prvi tužbeni razlog, kojime se tvrdi da Vijeće nije ispunilo kriterij za uvrštavanje na popis, odnosno da je osoba o kojoj je riječ „odgovorna za nasilnu represiju poduzetu protiv civilnog stanovništva u Siriji”, ili da je riječ o osobi „koja ima koristi od režima ili podupire režim”, ili o osobi povezanoj s takvom osobom. Vijeće nije utvrdilo osnovanost razloga iznesenih protiv osobe o kojoj je riječ.
 2.
 Drugi tužbeni razlog, kojime se tvrdi da je Vijeće povrijedilo tužiteljevo pravo na obranu i pravo na učinkovitu sudsku zaštitu. Tužitelju nisu ni u jednom stadiju dostavljeni „ozbiljni i vjerodostojni dokazi” ili „konkretni dokazi i podaci” u potporu argumenata koji bi opravdali mjere ograničavanja poduzete protiv njega, a što zahtijeva sudska praksa Suda.
 3.
 Treći tužbeni razlog, kojime se tvrdi da Vijeće nije dostatno obrazložilo svoju odluku o uvrštavanju tužitelja na popis.
 4.
 Četvrti tužbeni razlog, kojime se tvrdi da je Vijeće teško povrijedilo tužiteljeva temeljna prava na vlasništvo i ugled. Mjere ograničavanja nametnute su bez odgovarajućih zaštitnih mehanizama koji bi tužitelju omogućili da svoj predmet učinkovito iznese pred Vijeće. Vijeće nije dokazalo da je značajno miješanje u tužiteljeva vlasnička prava opravdano i proporcionalno. Miješanje koje je tužitelj pretrpio proteže se izvan financijskog učinka, te je također dovelo do povrede njegovog ugleda.
 5.
 Peti tužbeni razlog, kojime se tvrdi da je Vijeće počinilo očitu pogrešku u ocjeni. Suprotno jedinom razlogu za njegovo uvrštavanje na popis, ne postoje podaci ili dokazi da je tužitelj zaista „podupirao sirijski režim” i da je imao koristi od tog režima. Vijeće je također pogrešno označilo tužitelja „Tri Ocean Trading alias Tri-Ocean Energy”, sugerirajući da su te dvije pravne osobe ista osoba. Tužitelj je zasebno društvo, različito od Tri Ocean Trading.


text:
Lavori socialmente utili o LSU, vediamo cosa sono - Lavoro e Diritti
 Tu sei qui:Home»ABC Lavoro»Lavori socialmente utili o LSU, vediamo cosa sono
 Il lavoratore con prestazioni a sostegno del reddito in costanza di rapporto di lavoro può essere avviato ad attività o lavori socialmente utili (LSU)
 Di Milani Roberto 4 Aprile 2016
 Il lavoratore che beneficia di prestazioni a sostegno del reddito in costanza di rapporto di lavoro può essere avviato ad attività o lavori socialmente utili (LSU). Cassa Integrazione Guadagni, Contratti di Solidarietà, Fondi di Solidarietà, prevedono dunque la possibilità di coinvolgere il lavoratore in attività con fini di pubblica utilità. Vediamo allora cosa sono e come sono regolamentate.
 Il lavoratore che beneficia di Cassa Integrazione Guadagni, Contratti di Solidarietà, Fondi di Solidarietà, può essere avviato ad attività diverse dal rafforzamento delle competenze nella ricerca attiva di lavoro o di orientamento e riqualificazione professionale legate alla condizionalità della prestazione. L’art. 22, comma 2, del D.Lgs 150/2015 prevede infatti anche la possibilità di coinvolgere il lavoratore in attività o lavori socialmente utili (LSU) successivamente richiamate nello stesso decreto.
 L’art. 26, comma 1, del D.Lgs 150/2015 definisce le attività o lavori socialmente utili (LSU) come attività con fini di pubblica utilità da svolgere in favore della comunità territoriale di appartenenza, quindi di residenza, sotto la direzione ed il coordinamento delle Amministrazioni Pubbliche cosí come definite dall’art. 1, comma 2, del D.Lgs 165/2001, cioè tutte le amministrazioni dello Stato.
 Ai progetti e attività o lavori socialmente utili (LSU) già in corso all’entrata in vigore del D.Lgs 150/2015, quindi prima del 24.09.2015, si applica ancora quanto disposto dagli artt. 7 e 8 del D.Lgs 498/1997 in materia di utilizzazione dei lavoratori e modalità di utilizzo nelle attività di cui sopra.
 Leggi anche: sostegno del redditto in costanza di rapporto di lavoro
 Lavori socialmente utili: lavoratori utilizzabili
 L’art. 26, comma 1, del D.Lgs 150/2015 individua come lavoratori utilizzabili nelle attività o lavori socialmente utili (LSU) quelli che beneficiano di prestazioni di sostegno del reddito in costanza di rapporto di lavoro. Queste prestazioni sono:
 Lo stesso articolo, al comma 5, include inoltre come prestatori di attività LSU i lavoratori disoccupati con più di 60 anni che non abbiano ancora maturato il diritto al pensionamento anticipato o di vecchiaia.
 Sempre l’art. 26, comma 3, dello stesso decreto stabilisce che l’utilizzazione dei lavoratori in queste attività non determina l’instaurazione di un rapporto di lavoro. Le attività LSU devono inoltre avvenire in modo da non incidere sul corretto svolgimento del rapporto di lavoro in corso.
 La Circolare INPS 48 del 2016 precisa che l’importo mensile dell’assegno per le attività LSU è dal 01.01.2016 pari a 580,14 euro. A questa prestazione non si applica la trattenuta del 5,84 % prevista dall’art. 26 della Legge 41/1986.
 L’assegno per i lavoratori disoccupati con più di 60 anni di cui all’art. 26, comma 5, del D.Lgs 150/2015 viene erogato dall’INPS in base alla certificazione delle presenze da parte dell’Amministrazione Pubblica utilizzatrice secondo modalità fissate dall’Istituto stesso.
 In questo caso trovano inoltre applicazione le disposizioni previste per la Nuova Assicurazione Sociale per l’Impiego, l’indennità di disoccupazione NASpI, introdotte dal D.Lgs 22/2015 anche in tema di compatibilità con altra attività lavorativa e decadenza della prestazione (vedi artt. 10 e 11). Gli oneri restano comunque a carico dell’Amministrazione Pubblica utilizzatrice del lavoratore.
 Ai lavoratori impiegati in attività LSU spetta l’eventuale assegno per il nucleo familiare (ANF) come stabilito dalla Circolare INPS 82 del 1996.
 Ai sensi dell’art. 26, comma 4, del D.Lgs 150/2015, i lavoratori utilizzati nelle attività LSU devono essere impegnati nei limiti massimi di orario settimanale corrispondente alla proporzione tra il trattamento di sostegno al reddito e il livello retributivo iniziale (calcolato al netto delle ritenute previdenziali ed assistenziali) previsto per i dipendenti che svolgono attività analoghe nell’Amministrazione Pubblica promotrice.
 I lavoratori disoccupati con più di 60 anni coinvolti in attività LSU non possono superare le 20 ore settimanali di lavoro (vedi art. 26, comma 5, dello stesso decreto). In questi casi l’importo mensile è pari all’assegno sociale, eventualmente riproporzionato per un orario di lavoro inferiore alle 20 ore settimanali.
 Il comma 9 dell’art. 26 del D.Lgs 150/2015 prevede che le attività LSU vadano organizzate in modo che il lavoratore possa godere di un adeguato periodo di riposo entro i termini di durata dell’impegno preso con l’Amministrazione Pubblica. Durante i periodi di riposo viene comunque corrisposto l’assegno.
 Il comma 10 dello stesso articolo regola poi le eventuali assenze. Ne deriva che:
 la Amministrazioni Pubbliche utilizzatrici stabiliscono tra le condizioni di utilizzo il periodo massimo di assenze per malattia compatibile con il buon andamento del progetto;
 le assenze dovute a motivi personali, anche se giustificate, comportano la sospensione dell’assegno;
 è facoltà del soggetto utilizzatore concordare l’eventuale recupero delle ore non prestate, in questo caso l’assegno non viene sospeso;
 in caso di assenze protratte e ripetute nel tempo che compromettano i risultati del progetto il soggetto utilizzatore può richiedere la sostituzione del lavoratore;
 in caso di assenze per infortunio o malattia professionale, al lavoratore viene corrisposto l’assegno per i giorni non coperti dall’indennità INAIL e viene riconosciuto il diritto a partecipare alle attività progettuali terminato il periodo di inabilità;
 le assenze per malattia, opportunamente documentate, non comportano la sospensione dell’assegno previsto per i lavoratori disoccupati con più di 60 anni di cui all’art. 26, comma 5, del D.Lgs 150/2015.
 In tema di ferie resta poi comunque sempre inteso quanto previsto dalla normativa sull’orario di lavoro regolata dal D.Lgs 66/2003.
 I lavoratori coinvolti in attività LSU hanno diritto all’astensione dal lavoro e relativi permessi per maternità, paternità, assistenza familiari prevista dalla Legge 104/1992.
 Ai sensi dell’art. 26, comma 8, del D.Lgs 150/2015 le Amministrazioni Pubbliche promotrici di attività LSU attivano per i lavoratori utilizzati idonee coperture assicurative con l’INAIL contro infortuni e malattie professionali legate allo svolgimento dell’attività lavorativa, nonché per la responsabilità civile verso terzi.
 Il comma 11 dello stesso articolo consente poi al lavoratore la possibilità di riscattare i periodi prestati di attività LSU a fini pensionistici ai sensi della normativa vigente in materia, con particolare riguardo all’art. 5 e seguenti del D.Lgs 184/1997.
 Per i lavoratori disoccupati con più di 60 anni di cui al comma 5 dello stesso articolo avviene il riconoscimento d’ufficio (art. 7, comma 9, Legge 223/1991) solo ai fini dell’acquisizione dei requisiti assicurativi per il diritto al pensionamento.
 L’assegno previsto in questi casi, ai sensi del comma 7 dello stesso articolo, è incompatibile con i trattamenti pensionistici diretti a carico dell’assicurazione generale obbligatoria per l’invalidità, la vecchiaia ed i superstiti dei lavoratori dipendenti, degli ordinamenti sostitutivi, esonerativi ed esclusivi dell’assicurazione medesima, nonché delle gestioni speciali dei lavoratori autonomi e i trattamenti di pensionamento anticipato. Sono invece cumulabili con questo trattamento gli assegni e le pensioni di invalidità civile o le pensioni privilegiate per infermità a causa del servizio obbligatorio di leva.
 I titolari di assegno o pensione di invalidità possono eventualmente scegliere l’assegno di cui sopra in caso di inizio di attività o lavori socialmente utili (LSU).
 » 280,3 KiB - 6.720 download
 Leggi anche: Politiche Attive del Lavoro, la guida della Fondazione Studi
 Nuovi lavori online: quali sono e come trovare i migliori corsi su internet