text:
 19.5.2017
 SL
 Uradni list Evropske unije
 L 128/14
 IZVEDBENA UREDBA KOMISIJE (EU) 2017/856
 z dne 18. maja 2017
 o spremembi Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 540/2011 glede pogojev za registracijo aktivne snovi fluroksipir
 (Besedilo velja za EGP)
 EVROPSKA KOMISIJA JE –
 ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije,
 ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 1107/2009 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 21. oktobra 2009 o dajanju fitofarmacevtskih sredstev v promet in razveljavitvi direktiv Sveta 79/117/EGS in 91/414/EGS (1) ter zlasti druge alternative člena 21(3) in člena 78(2) Uredbe,
 ob upoštevanju naslednjega:
 (1)
 Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 736/2011 (2) je odobrila fluroksipir kot aktivno snov v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 1107/2009, pod določeni pogoji, pri čemer je od zadevnih držav članic zahtevala, da zagotovijo, da vlagatelj, na čigar zahtevo je bil fluroksipir odobren, predloži dodatne potrditvene informacije o šestih točkah, od katerih ena zadeva relevantnost nečistoč v tehničnih specifikacijah.
 (2)
 Da bi izpolnil zahteve glede potrditvenih informacij, je vlagatelj v za to določenem roku, in sicer 25. junija 2012 in 5. septembra 2013, državi poročevalki Irski predložil dodatne informacije.
 (3)
 Irska je ocenila dodatne informacije, ki jih je predložil vlagatelj. Svojo oceno je v obliki dodatka k osnutku poročila o oceni 22. decembra 2014 predložila drugim državam članicam, Komisiji in Evropski agenciji za varnost hrane (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Agencija) in jih pozvala, naj predložijo pripombe o oceni.
 (4)
 Agencija je 22. julija 2015 objavila tehnično poročilo (3) s povzetkom izida tega posvetovalnega postopka v zvezi s fluroksipirom.
 (5)
 Osnutek poročila o oceni, dodatek in tehnično poročilo so države članice in Komisija pregledale v okviru Stalnega odbora za rastline, živali, hrano in krmo ter končno različico pripravile 23. marca 2017 v obliki poročila Komisije o pregledu fluroksipira.
 (6)
 Komisija je vlagatelja pozvala, naj predloži pripombe k poročilu o pregledu fluroksipira.
 (7)
 N-metil-2-pirolidon (NMP) je v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 1272/2008 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta (4) razvrščen kot strupen za razmnoževanje kategorije 1B in ima splošno mejno koncentracijo 0,3 %. Prisotnost NMP v tehničnem materialu pod 3 g/kg zelo verjetno ne bi predstavljala nobenega tveganja za potrošnike. Zato je Komisija sklenila, da so predložene dodatne informacije pokazale, da bi morala biti najvišja vsebnost za toksikološko relevantno nečistočo NMP določena na manj kot 3 g/kg (< 0,3 %) v tehničnem materialu.
 (8)
 Za zagotovitev visoke ravni varstva potrošnikov je zato primerno, da se določi najvišja vsebnost za to nečistočo v aktivni snovi, proizvedeni za trženje.
 (9)
 Prilogo k Izvedbeni uredbi Komisije (EU) št. 540/2011 (5) bi bilo zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
 (10)
 Državam članicam bi bilo treba omogočiti dovolj časa za spremembo ali preklic registracij fitofarmacevtskih sredstev, ki vsebujejo fluroksipir.
 (11)
 Za fitofarmacevtska sredstva, ki vsebujejo fluroksipir in pri katerih države članice odobrijo morebitno prehodno obdobje v skladu s členom 46 Uredbe (ES) št. 1107/2009, bi se moralo navedeno obdobje izteči najpozneje 8. septembra 2018.
 (12)
 Ukrepi iz te uredbe so v skladu z mnenjem Stalnega odbora za rastline, živali, hrano in krmo –
 SPREJELA NASLEDNJO UREDBO:
 Člen 1
 Sprememba Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 540/2011
 Priloga k Izvedbeni uredbi (EU) št. 540/2011 se spremeni v skladu s Prilogo k tej uredbi.
 Člen 2
 Prehodni ukrepi
 Države članice v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 1107/2009 najpozneje do 8. septembra 2017 po potrebi spremenijo ali prekličejo veljavne registracije fitofarmacevtskih sredstev, ki vsebujejo fluroksipir kot aktivno snov.
 Člen 3
 Prehodno obdobje
 Morebitno prehodno obdobje, ki ga države članice odobrijo v skladu s členom 46 Uredbe (ES) št. 1107/2009, je čim krajše, izteče pa se najpozneje 8. septembra 2018.
 Člen 4
 Začetek veljavnosti
 Ta uredba začne veljati dvajseti dan po objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
 Ta uredba je v celoti zavezujoča in se neposredno uporablja v vseh državah članicah.
 V Bruslju, 18. maja 2017
 Za Komisijo
 Predsednik
 Jean-Claude JUNCKER
 (1) UL L 309, 24.11.2009, str. 1.
 (2) Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 736/2011 z dne 26. julija 2011 o odobritvi aktivne snovi fluroksipir v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 1107/2009 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o dajanju fitofarmacevtskih sredstev v promet in spremembi Priloge k Izvedbeni uredbi Komisije (EU) št. 540/2011 (UL L 195, 27.7.2011, str. 37).
 (3) EFSA (Evropska agencija za varnost hrane), 2015. Tehnično poročilo o izidu posvetovanja z državami članicami, vlagateljem in EFSA o oceni tveganja pesticidov za fluroksipir ob upoštevanju potrditvenih podatkov. (Technical report on the outcome of the consultation with Member States, the applicant and EFSA on the pesticide risk assessment for fluroxypyr in light of confirmatory data.) Povezane objave EFSA 2015:EN-857. 43 str.
 (4) Uredba (ES) št. 1272/2008 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 16. decembra 2008 o razvrščanju, označevanju in pakiranju snovi ter zmesi, o spremembi in razveljavitvi direktiv 67/548/EGS in 1999/45/ES ter spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 1907/2006 (UL L 353, 31.12.2008, str. 1).
 (5) Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 540/2011 z dne 25. maja 2011 o izvajanju Uredbe (ES) št. 1107/2009 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta glede seznama registriranih aktivnih snovi (UL L 153, 11.6.2011, str. 1).
 PRILOGA
 Stolpec „Čistost“ za fluroksipir v vrstici 9 dela B Priloge k Izvedbeni uredbi (EU) št. 540/2011 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
 „≥ 950 g/kg (fluroksipir-meptil)
 Naslednja proizvodna nečistoča je s toksikološkega vidika problematična in ne sme presegati naslednje količine v tehničnem materialu:
 N-metil-2-pirolidon (NMP): < 3 g/kg“
 Stolpec „Posebne določbe“ za fluroksipir v vrstici 9 dela B Priloge k Izvedbeni uredbi (EU) št. 540/2011 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
 „DEL A
 Registrira se lahko samo kot herbicid.
 DEL B
 Za izvajanje enotnih načel iz člena 29(6) Uredbe (ES) št. 1107/2009 se upoštevajo ugotovitve iz poročila o pregledu fluroksipira ter zlasti dodatka I in II h končni različici poročila, ki jo je Stalni odbor za rastline, živali, hrano in krmo pripravil 23. marca 2017.
 V tej celoviti oceni morajo biti države članice zlasti pozorne na:
 —
 morebitno onesnaženje podzemne vode z metabolitom fluroksipir piridinolom, če se aktivna snov uporablja na območjih z alkalnimi ali občutljivimi tlemi ali neugodnimi podnebnimi razmerami;
 —
 tveganje za vodne organizme.
 Pogoji za registracijo po potrebi vključujejo ukrepe za zmanjšanje tveganja.“


type: other

text:
Studija - Pagarba nacionaliniam tapatumui pagal Europos Sąjungos teisę: aiškinimo potencialas ir Europos Sąjungos Teisingumo Teismo jurisprudencija | Puslapis 3 | @eitis
 Pradžios data 2014-06-04
 europos sąjungos teisė europos sąjungos teisingumo teismas nacionalinis tapatumas
 Konstitucinių teismų vis palankesnis požiūris į teismų bendradarbiavimą verčia koreguoti požiūrį į „konstitucinio tapatumo“ kategorijos reikšmę. Jei iš pradžių jai teko nacionalinio tapatumo skydo vaidmuo, tai, žvelgiant iš dabartinio konstitucionalizmo raidos etapo pozicijų, ji labiau sietina su D. Rousseau pasiūlyta „žvaigždės formos ES kūrimo būdo“ koncepcija Žr. Dominique Rousseau, «Lʾidentité constitutionnelle, bouclier de lʾidentité nationale ou branche de lʾétoile européenne», p. 90. . Jis teigia, kad kelzeniškoji piramidės metafora netinka ES ir konstitucinių sistemų santykiams apibūdinti, kad į ES tapatumą reikėtų žiūrėti kaip į žvaigždę, kurios spinduliai yra konstituciniai tapatumai, lemiantys žvaigždės gyvybinę energiją, bet ir spindulių švytėjimas priklauso nuo žvaigždės Žr. ten pat, p. 98–99. .
 Būtina sėkmingo bendradarbiavimo sąlyga – abipusis bendradarbiaujančių teismų supratimas ir pagarba vienas kito prerogatyvoms. Europiniams teisėjams svarbu suprasti ne tik ES teisę, bet ir 28 nacionalinių teisinių sistemų veikimo ypatumus, o nacionaliniai teisėjai negali ignoruoti ES teisės. Teisingumo Teismas, aiškindamas ES teisę, visada turi pagarbiai žvelgti į nacionalines konstitucines sistemas, o konstituciniai teismai, vykdydami konstitucingumo kontrolę, negali pamiršti šalies narystės ES teisinių aspektų. Tik suprasdamas nacionalinių konstitucinių sistemų ypatumų reikšmę Teisingumo Teismas gali sėkmingai išvesti tarpsisteminės pusiausvyros ašį.
 Šiuo požiūriu nemenką reikšmę įgyja teisės doktrinos atstovų rašiniuose akcentuojamos tezės „teismų karui ne vieta“, „būtinas teismų dialogas“ Olivier Dord, «Systèmes juridiques nationaux et cours européennes: de lʾaffrontement à la complementarité?», p. 6. , ne „kovos lauko“, bet teisinių sistemų „susitikimo vietos“ Denis Preshova, “Battleground or Meeting Point? Respect for National Identities in the European Union-Article 4 (2) of the Treaty on European Union,” 2012. koncepcijos, formuojančios palankų požiūrį į Teisingumo Teismo ir nacionalinių teismų bendradarbiavimą. Sisteminio uždarumo, sistemų priešpriešos, sistemos savęs pakankamumo praktikų alternatyva – pozityvus veikimas, atviras sprendimų paieškos kelias. Teismų bendradarbiavimą skatina ir Europos Sąjungos Teisingumo Teismo bei nacionalinių teismų santykių aiškinimo siejimas su autonomiškų teisinių sistemų nehierarchiniu sąveikos modeliu.
 Teismų bendradarbiavimo istorija patvirtina, kad, nepaisant požiūrių skirtumų, tiek Teisingumo Teismas, tiek konstituciniai teismai suvokia tarpsisteminės pusiausvyros reikšmę ir stengiasi jos nepažeisti. Šiai pusiausvyrai būdinga nuolatinė dinamika. Regis, galima kalbėti ir apie tvirtėjantį pusiausvyros pojūtį. Mokslinei doktrinai tenka misija aiškinti tokios pusiausvyros reikšmę, atskleisti Teisingumo Teismo ir nacionalinių teismų bendradarbiavimo mechanizmą, jo funkcionavimą. Ir ES pirminėje teisėje įtvirtinto pagarbos nacionaliniam tapatumui principo aiškinimo ir taikymo praktika turi būti vertinama tarpsisteminės darnos užtikrinimo požiūriu.
 Pabaigoje keletas išvadų, kurias, aptarę ES pagarbos valstybių narių nacionaliniam tapatumui principo įtvirtinimą ES pirminės teisės aktų tekste, šio principo mokslinio suvokimo problemas bei ESTT jurisprudenciją, kurioje šis principas aiškinamas ir taikomas, drįstame formuluoti:
 1. Pagarbos nacionaliniam tapatumui principo tiesioginį įtvirtinimą pirminėje ES teisėje reikia sieti su siekiu užtikrinti integracinių procesų plėtojimosi ir poreikio apsaugoti valstybių narių nacionalinės esaties pagrindus pusiausvyrą. Lisabonos sutartimi nustatytoje ESS 4 straipsnio 2 dalies redakcijoje išryškinti šio principo sampratai svarbiausi nacionalinio tapatumo elementai: pagrindinės politinės ir konstitucinės struktūros, įskaitant regioninę ir vietos savivaldą.
 2. Teisės doktrinoje nuostatoms dėl ES pagarbos valstybių narių nacionaliniam tapatumui pripažįstamas principo statusas, pabrėžiama jo reikšmė ne tik ES teisinei sistemai, bet ir šios sistemos sąveikai su valstybių narių teisinėmis sistemos, analizuojami reikšmingi šio principo turinio aspektai (kultūriniai, politiniai, instituciniai). Ypač daug dėmesio mokslinėje doktrinoje skiriama nacionalinio ir konstitucinio tapatumo kategorijų ryšio problemoms. Teisinė doktrina yra pasiūliusi gan platų šio principo reikšmės ir turinio sampratų spektrą, kurį galima laikyti reikšmingu paramos potencialu teismo institucijoms nagrinėjant bylas, kuriose vienu ar kitu aspektu iškyla ES teisės taikymo ribų klausimai.
 4. Teisingumo Teismo, kuriam patikėta oficialaus ES teisės aiškintojo misija, jurisprudencijoje nuostatos dėl ES pagarbos valstybių narių nacionaliniam tapatumui paprastai taikomos kaip grupės kompleksinio teisinio vertininimo elementų (pvz., tokių, kaip antai pagrindinės teisės, viešoji tvarka, proporcingumo principas ir pan.), kuriais grindžiamas sprendimas, sudedamoji dalis. Teismo jurisprudencijos vertintojai pabrėžia atsargų šio principo vartojimą, jo aiškinimo fragmentiškumą.
 5. Teisingumo Teismas, aiškindamas pagarbos nacionaliniam tapatumui principą, laikosi jau pirmuosiuose sprendimuose suformuotos aiškinimo krypties, šis principas kol kas dažniausiai naudojamas vertinant ES teisėje įtvirtintų principų ir laisvių nacionalinio ribojimo pagrįstumą.
 6. ES pagarbos valstybių narių nacionaliniam tapatumui principo ir ES ir nacionalinių teisinių sistemų pusiausvyros palaikymo ryšys suponuoja nuolatinį ESTT ir nacionalinių konstitucinių teismų dialogą, suartinantį šių teismo institucijų požiūrius.
 Teisės aktai ir teismų jurisprudencija
 CJCE, arrêt du 11septembre 2008, Union Général de Trabajadores de La Rioja UGT-RIOJA, C-428 à 434/06, Rec. 2008; p. I-6747.
 CJCE, arrêt du 2 juillet 1996, Commission c. Luxembourg, C-473/93, Rec. 1996, p. I-3207.
 CJCE, arrêt du 2 juillet 1996, Commission des Communautes européennes c. Grand-Duché de Luxembourg, C-473/93, Rec. 1996, p. I-3207.
 CJCE, arrêt du 26 fevrier 1991, Commission c. France, C-154/89, Rec. 1991, p. I-659.
 CJCE, arrêt du 26 fevrier 1991, Commission c. Grèce, C-198/89, Rec. 1991, p. I-727.
 CJCE, arrêt du 26 fevrier 1991, Commission c. Italie, C-180/89, Rec. 1991, p. I-709.
 CJCE, arrêt du 28 novembre 1989, Groener, 379/87, Rec. 1989, p. 3967.
 CJCE, conclusion de J. Kokott du 11 septembre 2008, UGT-Rioja, C-428/06, C-429/06, C-430/06, C-431/06, C-432/06, C-433/06, C-434/06, Rec. 2008, p. I-6747.
 CJCE, conclusion de M. Poires Maduro du 20 septembre 2005, Marrosu et Sardino, C-53/04, Rec. 2006, p. I-7213.
 CJUE, arrêt du 11 janvier 2000, Tanja Kreil, C-285/89, Rec. 1990, p. I-04727.
 CJUE, arrêt du 12 mai 2011, Runevič-Vardyn et Wardyn, C-391/09, Rec. 2006, p. I-3787.
 CJUE, arrêt du 12 septembre 2006, Espagne/Royaume-Uni, C-145/04, Rec. p. I-7917.
 CJUE, arrêt du 14 octobre 2004, Omega, C-36/02, Rec. p. I 9609.
 CJUE, arrêt du 16 avril 2013, Las, C-202/11, non encore publié au Recueil.
 CJUE, arrêt du 22 décembre 2010, Sayn Wittgenstein, C-208/09, Rec. 2010, p. I-13693.
 CJUE, arrêt du 24 mai 2011, Commission c. Luxembourg, C-51/08, Rec. 2011, p. I-04231.
 CJUE, arrêt du 4 mars 2004, Republique federale d’Allemagne/Commission, C-344/01, Rec. 2004, p. I-2081.
 CJUE, arrêt du 5 mars 2011, Union de televisiones Comerciales Asociadas (UTECA), C-222/07, Rec. 2009, p. I-01407.
 CJUE, arrêt du 6 septembre 2006, Portugal c. Commission, C-88/03, Rec. 2006, p. I-7115.
 CJUE, ordonnance du 1 octobre 2010, Affatato, C-3/10, non publié.
 Conseil constitutionnel, décision n° 2006-540 DC, du 27 juillet 2006, Journal officiel du 3 aout 2006, p. 11541.
 Czech Republic Constitutional Court, Case pl.ÚS 66/04, Judgment of 3 May 2006.
 Lietuvos Respublikos Konstitucinio Teismas, 2004 m. gruodžio 13 d. nutarimas, Valstybės žinios, nr. 181-6708 (atitaisymas – 2004, nr. 186).
 Bernard, Elsa, La spécificité du standard juridique en droit communautaire, Bruxelles: Bruylant, 2010.
 Besselink, Leonard, “National and Constitutional Identity Before and After Lisbon,” Utrecht Law Review, volume 6, issue 3 (November) 2010.
 Bogdandy, Armin von, “The European Constitution and European Identity: Text and Subtext of the Treaty Establishing a Constitution for Europe,” International Journal of Constitutional Law, 2005, volume 3, numbers 2 & 3.
 Bogdandy, Armin von; Stephan Schill, “Overcoming Absolute Primacy: Respect for National Identity under Lisbon Treaty,” Common Market Law Review, 2011, no. 48.
 Constantinesco, Vlad, «Des racines et des ailes: essai sur les rapports entre droit communautaire et droit constitutionnel» / Mélanges L. Dubouis: au carrefour des droits, Paris: Dalloz, 2002.
 Constantinesco, Vlad, «La confrontation centre identité européenne et identités constitutionnelles nationales: convergence ou contradiction? Contrepoint ou hiérarchie?» / Jean-Claude Masclet, Hélène Ruiz Fabri, Chabira Boutayeb, Stéphane Rodrigues (dir.), LʾUnion européene: union de droit, union des droits. Mélanges en lʾhonneur du professeur Philippe Manin. Paris: Éditions A. Pedone, 2010.
 Delperée, Francis, «La souveraineté de lʾÉtat à lʾheure de la mondialisation», Revue belge de droit constitutionnel, 2009, no. 3.
 Derosier, Jean-Philippe, «Le noyau constitutionnel identitaire, frein à lʾintégration européenne: contribution à une étude normativiste et comparée des rapports entre le noyau constitutionnel identitaire et le droit de lʾUnion européenne», VIIIe Congrès de AFDC, Nancy, 16-18 juin 2011 [žiūrėta 2014 m. vasario 6 d.].
 Dord, Olivier, «Systèmes juridiques nationaux et cours européennes: de lʾaffrontement à la complementarité?», Pouvoirs, 2001, no. 96.
 Grimm, Dieter, “Integration by Constitution,” International Journal of Constitutional Law, 2005, volume 3, numbers 2 & 3.
 Lenaerts, Koen; Jose A. Gutiérez-Fons, “The Constitutional Allocation of Powers and General Principles of EU Law,” Common Market Law Review, 2010, no. 47.
 Manin, Philippe, «La place de la diversité dans les traités sur lʾUnion européenne» / Mélanges en lʾhonneur de Jean Charpentier: la France, lʾEurope, Le Monde, Paris: Éditions A. Pedone, 2008.
 Martin, Sébastien, «Lʾidentité de lʾÉtat dans lʾUnion européenne: entre «identité nationale» et «identité constitutionnelle», Revue française de droit constitutionnel, 2012, no. 91, supplément électronique, p.e13-e44, DOI: 10.3917/ffdc.091.0013.
 Mouton, Jean-Denis, «Vers la reconnaissance des droits fondamentaux aux États dans le système communautaire?» / Études en l‘honneur de Jean-Claude Gautron: les dynamiques du droit européen au début de siècle, Paris: Pedone, 2004.
 Mouton, Jean-Denis, «Vers le reconnaissance dʾun droit au respect de lʾidentité nationale pour les États membres de lʾUnion» / Mélanges en lʾhonneur de Jean Charpentier: la France, lʾEurope, le Monde, Paris: Éditions A. Pedone, 2008.
 Nabli, Béligh, «Identité nationale et participation à lʾUnion européenne» / Un autre regard sur les relations internationales, Affaires-strategiques.info [žiūrėta 2014 m. vasario 6 d.].
 Nabli, Béligh, «Lʾidentité constitutionnelle européenne de lʾÉtat de lʾUnion» / Mélanges en lʾhonneur de Philippe Manin. LʾUnion européenne: union de droit, union des droits, Paris: Éditions A. Pedone, 2010.
 Oberdorff, Henri, «LʾUnion européenne: une nouvelle démocratie?» / Nathalie de Grove-Valdeyron, Marc Blanquet, Vincent Dussart (dir.), Mélanges en lʾhonneur du Professeur Joël Molinier, Paris: L.G.D.J., 2012.
 Pescatore, Pierre, Lʾordre juridique des Communautés européennes, PU Lièges 1975, rééd. 2006.
 Platon, Sébastien, «Le respect de lʾidentité nationale des États membres: frein ou recomposition de la gouvernance?», Revue de lʾUnion européenne, 2012, no. 556.
 Ponthoreau, Marie-Claire, «Constitution européenne et identités constitutionnelles nationales» / VII Congrès mondial de lʾAIDC, Athènes, 11-15 juin 2007 [žiūrėta 2014 m. vasario 6 d.].
 Ponthoreau, Marie-Claire, «Identité constitutionnelle et clause européenne dʾidentité nationale: lʾEurope à lʾépreuve des identités constitutionnelles nationales», Diritto pubblico comparato ed europeo, 2007-IV.
 Preshova, Denis, “Battleground or Meeting Point? Respect for National Identities in the European Union-Article 4 (2) of the Treaty on European Union,” Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy, 2012, vol. 8 [žiūrėta 2014 m. vasario 6 d.].
 Puttler, Adelheid, «Le renforcement de la notion dʾidentité nationale dans lʾUnion européenne» / Jean Rossetto, Abdelkhaleq Berramdane, Wolfram Cremer et al. (dir.), Quel avenir pour lʾintegration européenne, Presses universitaires François-Rabelais, 2014
 Ritleng, Dominique, «De lʾutilité du principe de primauté du droit de l‘Union», Revue trimestrielle de droit européen, 2009, no. 4.
 Rosas, Allan; Lorna Armati, EU Constitutional Law: An Introduction, Second Revised Edition, Oxford and Portland, Oregon: Hart Publishing, 2012.
 Rousseau, Dominique, «Lʾidentité constitutionnelle, bouclier de lʾidentité nationale ou branche de lʾétoile européenne» / Lʾidentité constitutionnelle saisie par les juges en Europe, Paris: Éditions A. Pedone, 2011.
 Simon, Denys, «Lʾidentité constitutionnelle dans la jurisprudence de l‘Union européenne» / Lʾidentité constitutionnelle saisie par les juges en Europe, Paris: Éditions A. Pedone, 2011.
 Tizzano, Antonio, «Notes sur le rôle de la Cour de justice de lʾUnion européenne» / Vincent Kronenberger (dir.), De Rome à Lisbonne: les juridictions de lʾUnion européenne à la croisée des chemins. Mélanges en lʾhonneur de Paolo Mengozzi, Maria Teresa D‘Alessio, Valerio Placco, Bruxelles: Bruylant, 2013.
 Voßkuhle, Andreas, “The Cooperation Between European Courts: The Verbund of European Courts and its Legal Toolbox,” The Court of Justice and Construction of Europe: Analyses and Perspectives on Sixty Years of Case-law, Asser Press: The Hague, 2013.
 Jarukaitis, Irmantas, „Nacionalinis savitumas kaip integracijos proceso ir Europos Sąjungos teisės taikymo riba“, Konstitucionalizmas ir supranacionalizmas, nacionalinė konferencija, Vilnius, 2013 m. rugsėjo 26 d. [žiūrėta 2014 m. vasario 6 d.].
 Paužaitė-Kulvinskienė, Jurgita, „Ius Publicum Europaeun: bendrystė tarp nacionalinio identiteto ir europinio integralumo“, Konstitucionalizmas ir supranacionalizmas, nacionalinė konferencija, Vilnius, 2013 m. rugsėjo 26 d. [žiūrėta 2014 m. vasario 6 d.].
 Žalimas, Dainius, „Tarptautinės ir Europos Sąjungos teisės taikymo plėtojant oficialiąją konstitucinę doktriną principai“, Konstitucionalizmas ir supranacionalizmas, nacionalinė konferencija, Vilnius, 2013 m. rugsėjo 26 d. [žiūrėta 2014 m. vasario 6 d.].
 Respect for National Identity in the Law of the European Union: Potential for Interpretation and Case–Law of the European Court of Justice
 Bibliographic Description: Egidijus Jarašiūnas, Pagarba nacionaliniam tapatumui pagal Europos Sąjungos teisę: aiškinimo potencialas ir Europos Sąjungos Teisingumo Teismo jurisprudencija, @eitis (lt), 2016, t. 671, ISSN 2424-421X.
 Previous Edition: Egidijus Jarašiūnas, „Pagarba nacionaliniam tapatumui pagal Europos Sąjungos teisę: aiškinimo potencialas ir Europos Sąjungos Teisingumo Teismo jurisprudencija“, Teisė, 2014, nr. 93, p. 7–28, ISSN 1392-1274.
 Summary: Article 4 (2) of the Treaty of the European Union, in its version following the adoption of the Lisbon Treaty, proclaims that the European Union shall respect the national identities of its Member States, inherent in their political and constitutional fundamental structures, inclusive of regional and local self-government. This clause can be compared with the third paragraph of the preamble of the Lithuanian Constitutional Act of Membership of Lithuania in the European Union, which states that the Union shall respect national identity and constitutional traditions of its Member States. One can note that the clause on the respect by the European Union of the national identities of its Member States is the result of a desire to ensure a balance between the strengthening of the European integration process and the protection of the national identities of Member States.
 Legal doctrine recognizes the clause of respect, by the European Union, of the national identities of its Member States as a legal principle. According to the doctrine, this principle is important not only for the EU legal system, but also for the interaction between the EU and its Member States’ legal systems. Authors analyze the diverse aspects of this principle (cultural, political-institutional) and the relationships between national and constitutional identities. Legal doctrine has proposed a wide range of possible meanings of this principle, which can be used as a basis for a serious reflection on the potential judicial interpretation and application of this principle.
 The European Court of Justice, which is the official interpreter of EU law, applies the clause of respect for national identities of EU Member States in its case-law together with other legal elements (such as fundamental rights, proportionality, protection of public order etc.) on which it grounds its decisions. The judgments of the Court of Justice in Omega, Spain v United Kingdom, Sayn-Wittgenstein, and Runevič-Vardyn and Wardyn cases are examples of this principle being used in European case-law. This principle is usually applied in the case-law of the European Court of Justice in order to draw limits of fundamental freedoms and principles of EU law in individual cases.
 Because of the impact of the principle of respect for national identities of Member States on the balance between the European and the national legal systems, a dialogue between the ECJ and the national constitutional courts for the convergence of their positions is necessary.
 Keywords: national identity, European Union law, European Court of Justice.


type: contracts

jurisdiction: EU

text:
 Avviż Legali Importanti
 |
 21999D1118(04)
 Official Journal L 297 , 18/11/1999 P. 0040 - 0041
 Deċiżjoni tal-Kumitat Konġunt taż-ŻEENru 115/98tat-18 ta' Diċembru 1998li temenda l-Anness II (Regolamenti, standards, ittestjar u ċertifikazzjonijiet tekniċi) għall-Ftehim taż-ŻEEIL-KUMITAT KONĠUNT TAŻ-ŻEE,Wara li kkunsidra l-Ftehim dwar iż-Żona Ekonomika Ewropea, kif aġġustat bil-Protokoll li jaġġusta l-Ftehim għaż-Żona Ekonomika Ewropea, minn hawn iżjed 'il quddiem issir referenza għalih bħala "il-Ftehim", u b'mod partikolari l-Artikolu 98 tiegħu,Billi l-Anness II għall-Ftehim ġie emendat bid-Deċiżjoni tal-Kumitat Konġunt taż-ŻEE Nru 63/98 ta' l-4 ta' Lulju 1998 [1];Billi d-Deċiżjoni tal-Kummissjoni 97/520/KE tad-9 ta' Lulju 1997 dwar regolament tekniku komuni għal ħtiġiet ta' tqabbid ta' apparat terminali ta' interface għal konnessjoni ma' linji diġitali ONP ta' 2048 kbits/s mhux strutturati u mikrija [2] għandha tiġi inkorporata fil-Ftehim;Billi d-Deċiżjoni tal-Kummissjoni 97/521/KE tad-9 ta' Lulju 1997 dwar regolament tekniku komuni għal ħtiġiet ta' tqabbid ta' apparat terminali ta' interface għal konnessjoni ma' linji diġitali ONP ta' 2048 kbits/s mhux strutturati u mikrija [3] għandha tiġi inkorporata fil-Ftehim,Billi d-Deċiżjoni tal-Kummissjoni 97/522/KE tad-9 ta' Lulju 1997 dwar regolament tekniku komuni għal ħtiġiet ta' tqabbid ta' apparat terminali ta' interface għal konnessjoni ma' linji diġitali ONP ta' 64 kbits/s mhux strutturati u mikrija (Emenda 1) [4] għandha tiġi inkorporata fil-Ftehim;Billi d-Deċiżjoni tal-Kummissjoni 97/520/KE tirrevoka, b'effett mill-10 ta' Lulju 1998, id-Deċiżjoni tal-Kummissjoni 94/470/KE dwar regolament komuni tekniku għal ħtiġiet ta' tqabbid għal apparat terminali ta' interface għal linji diġitali ONP ta' 2048 kbits/s mhux strutturati u mikrija, li hija nkorporata fil-Ftehim u li b'konsekwenza għandha tiġi revokata taħt il-Ftehim;Billi d-Deċiżjoni tal-Kummissjoni 97/522/KE tirrevoka, b'effett mill-10 ta' Lulju 1998, id-Deċiżjoni tal-Kummissjoni 94/821/KE dwar regolament komuni tekniku għal ħtiġiet ta' applikazzjoni għat-telefonijagħal ħtiġiet ta' tqabbid għal apparat terminali ta' interface għal linji diġitali ONP ta' 64 kbits/s mhux strutturati u mikrija, li hija nkorporata fil-Ftehim u li b'konsekwenza għandha tiġi rrevokata taħt il-Ftehim,IDDEĊIEDA KIF ĠEJ:Artikolu 1Il-punti li ġejjin għandhom jiddaħħlu wara l-punt 4x. (Id-Deċiżjoni tal-Kummissjoni 97/529/KE) fil-Kapitolu XVIII ta' l-Annex II għall-Ftehim:"4y. 397 D 0520: Id-Deċiżjoni tal-Kummissjoni 97/520/KE tad-9 ta' Lulju 1997 dwar regolament tekniku komuni għal ħtiġiet ta' tqabbid ta' apparat terminali ta' interface għal konnessjoni ma' linji diġitali ONP ta' 2048 kbits/s mhux strutturati u mikrija (Emenda 1) (ĠU L 215, tas-7.8.1997, p. 41).4z. 397 D 0521: Id-Deċiżjoni tal-Kummissjoni 97/521/KE tad-9 ta' Lulju 1997 dwar regolament tekniku komuni għal ħtiġiet ta' tqabbid ta' apparat terminali ta' interface għal konnessjoni ma' linji diġitali ONP ta' 2048 kbits/s mhux strutturati u mikrija (Emenda 1) (ĠU L 215, tas-7.8.1997, p. 44).4za. 397 D 0522: Id-Deċiżjoni tal-Kummissjoni 97/522/KE tad-9 ta' Lulju 1997 dwar regolament tekniku komuni għal ħtiġiet ta' tqabbid ta' apparat terminali ta' interface għal konnessjoni ma' linji diġitali ONP ta' 64 kbits/s mhux strutturati u mikrija (Emenda 1) (ĠU L 215, tas-7.8.1997, p. 46)."Artikolu 2It-testi tal-punt 4ċ (Deċiżjoni tal-Kummissjoni 94/470/KE) u l-punt 4h. (Deċiżjoni tal-Kummissjoni 94/821/KE) fil-Kapitolu XVIII ta' l-Annex II għall-Ftehim għandhom jiġu mħassra.Artikolu 3It-testi tad-Deċiżjonijonijiet tal-Kummissjoni 97/520/KE, 97/521/KE u 97/522/KE fil-lingwa Islandiża u f'dik Norveġiża, li huma annessi għall-verżjonijiet rispettivi tal-lingwa għal din id-Deċiżjoni, huma awtentiċi.Artikolu 4Din id-Deċiżjoni għandha tidħol fis-seħħ nhar id-19 ta' Diċembru 1998, sakemm ikunu saru n-notifiki kollha taħt l-Artikolu 103(1) tal-Ftehim lill-Kumitat Konġunt taż-ŻEE.Artikolu 5Din id-Deċiżjoni għandha tiġi ppubblikata fit-Taqsima taż-ŻEE ta', u fis-Suppliment taż-ŻEE għall-Ġurnal Uffiċjali tal-Komunitajiet Ewropej.Magħmula fi Brussel, fit-18 ta' Diċembru 1998.Għall-Kumitat Konġunt taż-ŻEEIl-PresidentN. v. Liechtenstein[1] ĠU L 100, tal-15.4.1999, p. 50.[2] ĠU L 215, tas-7.8.1997, p. 41.[3] ĠU L 215, tas-7.8.1997, p. 44.[4] ĠU L 215, tas-7.8.1997, p. 46.--------------------------------------------------


type: caselaw

text:
27.8.2011
 DA
 Den Europæiske Unions Tidende
 C 252/57
 Sag anlagt den 24. juni 2011 — ZZ mod Europa-Kommissionen
 (Sag F-64/11)
 2011/C 252/126
 Processprog: engelsk
 Parter
 Sagsøger: ZZ (ved advokaterne S. Crosby og S. Santoro)
 Sagsøgt: Europa-Kommissionen
 Søgsmålets genstand og beskrivelse af tvisten
 Annullation af sagsøgtes afgørelse om ensidigt at tilbagetrække det over for sagsøgeren fremsatte tilbud om ansættelse, selv om sagsøgeren allerede havde accepteret tilbuddet.
 Sagsøgerens påstande
 —
 Annullation af afgørelsen af 4. marts 2011, hvorved Europa-Kommissionen afslog den af sagsøgeren indgivne interne klage over Kommissionens afgørelse HR B2 (2010) 662634 af 5. oktober 2010.
 —
 Kommissionen tilpligtes at betale erstatning for den af sagsøgeren lidte skade, herunder tidligere løn og andre goder.
 —
 Europa-Kommissionen tilpligtes at betale sagens omkostninger.


text:
 13.3.2008
 PT
 Jornal Oficial da União Europeia
 L 69/34
 DECISÃO N.o 219/2008 DO COMITÉ MISTO CE-SUÍÇA
 de 22 de Fevereiro de 2008
 que substitui os quadros III e IV b) do Protocolo n.o 2
 (2008/219/CE)
 A COMISSÃO MISTA,
 Tendo em conta o Acordo entre a Comunidade Económica Europeia, por um lado, e a Confederação Suíça, por outro, assinado em Bruxelas em 22 de Julho de 1972, em seguida designado por «Acordo», com a redacção que lhe foi dada pelo Acordo entre a Comunidade Económica Europeia e a Confederação Suíça que altera o acordo no que se refere às disposições aplicáveis aos produtos agrícolas transformados, assinado no Luxemburgo em 26 de Outubro de 2004, e o respectivo Protocolo n.o 2, nomeadamente o artigo 7.o,
 Considerando o seguinte:
 (1)
 Para a aplicação do Protocolo n.o 2 do acordo, o Comité Misto fixa preços de referência internos para as partes contratantes.
 (2)
 Os preços reais registaram alterações nos mercados internos das partes contratantes, no que diz respeito às matérias-primas em relação às quais se aplicam medidas de compensação de preços.
 (3)
 Considerando que é necessário, por conseguinte, actualizar os preços de referência e os montantes dos quadros III e IV b) do Protocolo n.o 2 em conformidade.
 (4)
 A actual situação do mercado alterou-se significativamente em comparação com anos anteriores, nomeadamente pela novidade que constituiu a introdução de medidas compensatórias em matéria de preços na fronteira europeia, dado que os preços internos de determinados produtos de base na Suíça provaram ser inferiores aos preços internos desses produtos na Comunidade.
 (5)
 Como se espera que a volatilidade do mercado continue, os parceiros trocarão informações de dois em dois meses e, caso sejam assinaladas diferenças substanciais, poderá seguir-se uma alteração da presente decisão,
 ADOPTOU A PRESENTE DECISÃO:
 Artigo 1.o
 Os quadros III e IV b) do Protocolo n.o 2 são substituídos pelos quadros do anexo I e do anexo II da presente decisão.
 Artigo 2.o
 A presente decisão é aplicável a partir de 1 de Fevereiro de 2008.
 Feito em Bruxelas, em 22 de Fevereiro de 2008.
 Pelo Comité Misto
 O Presidente
 Jacques DE WATTEVILLE
 ANEXO I
 «QUADRO III
 Preços de referência dos mercados internos comunitário e suíço
 Matéria-prima agrícola
 Preço de referência do mercado interno suíço
 CHF/100 kg líquidos
 Preço de referência do mercado interno comunitário
 CHF/100 kg líquidos
 N.o 1 do artigo 4.o
 Aplicação no lado suíço
 Diferença preço de ref.a suíço/comunitário
 CHF/100 kg líquidos
 N.o 3 do artigo 3.o
 Aplicação no lado da União Europeia
 Diferença preço de ref.a suíço/comunitário
 EUR/100 kg líquidos
 Trigo mole
 59,71
 44,14
 15,55
 0,00
 Trigo duro
 71,05
 68,55
 2,50
 0,00
 Centeio
 59,15
 40,61
 18,54
 0,00
 Cevada
 52,65
 52,65
 0,00
 0,00
 Milho
 37,94
 37,94
 0,00
 0,00
 Farinha de trigo mole
 104,00
 68,55
 35,45
 0,00
 Leite em pó inteiro
 582,00
 651,20
 0,00
 35,32
 Leite em pó desnatado
 447,10
 610,44
 0,00
 83,20
 Manteiga
 922,00
 690,12
 231,90
 0,00
 Açúcar branco
 —
 —
 —
 —
 Ovos (1)
 255,00
 205,50
 49,50
 0,00
 Batatas frescas
 42,00
 23,80
 18,20
 0,00
 Gordura vegetal (2)
 390,00
 160,00
 230,00
 0,00
 (1) Derivado dos preços de ovos de aves, sem casca, líquidos, multiplicados pelo factor 0,85.
 (2) Preços para gorduras vegetais (para a panificação e a indústria alimentar) com teor de matéria gorda de 100 %.»
 ANEXO II
 «QUADRO IV
 b)
 Montantes de base das matérias-primas agrícolas consideradas no cálculo dos elementos agrícolas:
 Matéria-prima agrícola
 Aplicação no lado suíço n.o 2 do artigo 3.o
 Montante básico aplicado
 CHF/100 kg líquidos
 Aplicação no lado comunitário n.o 2 do artigo 4.o
 Montante básico aplicado
 EUR/100 kg líquidos
 Trigo mole
 13,20
 0,00
 Trigo duro
 2,00
 0,00
 Centeio
 15,60
 0,00
 Cevada
 0,00
 0,00
 Milho
 0,00
 0,00
 Farinha de trigo mole
 30,00
 0,00
 Leite em pó inteiro
 0,00
 41,42 (1)
 Leite em pó desnatado
 0,00
 97,78 (1)
 Manteiga
 197,00
 0,00
 Açúcar branco
 0,00
 0,00
 Ovos
 34,00
 0,00
 Batatas frescas
 15,00
 0,00
 Gordura vegetal
 196,00
 0,00
 (1) A ajuda à exportação sob a forma de compensação em matéria de preços está sujeita ao artigo 11.o do Acordo OMC.»


text:
 Pomembno pravno obvestilo
 |
 22003D0043
 Uradni list L 193 , 31/07/2003 str. 0010 - 0011
 Sklep Skupnega odbora EGPšt. 43/2003z dne 16. maja 2003o spremembi Priloge II (Tehnični predpisi, standardi, preskušanje in certificiranje) k Sporazumu EGPSKUPNI ODBOR EGP JE -ob upoštevanju Sporazuma o Evropskem gospodarskem prostoru, kakor ga spreminja Protokol o prilagoditvi Sporazuma o Evropskem gospodarskem prostoru, v nadaljnjem besedilu "Sporazum", in zlasti člena 98 Sporazuma,ob upoštevanju naslednjega:(1) Priloga II k Sporazumu je bila spremenjena s Sklepom št.162/2002 Skupnega odbora EGP z dne 6. decembra 2002 [1].(2) Uredbo Komisije št. 868/2002 z dne 24. maja 2002 o spremembi prilog I in II k Uredbi Sveta (EGS) št. 2377/90 o določitvi postopka Skupnosti za določanje najvišjih dovoljenih količin zaostankov zdravil za uporabo v veterinarski medicini v živilih živalskega izvora [2] je treba vključiti v Sporazum.(3) Uredbo Komisije št. 869/2002 z dne 24. maja 2002 o spremembi prilog I, II in III k Uredbi Sveta (EGS) št. 2377/90 o določitvi postopka Skupnosti za določanje najvišjih dovoljenih količin zaostankov zdravil za uporabo v veterinarski medicini v živilih živalskega izvora [3] je treba vključiti v Sporazum.(4) Uredbo Komisije št. 1530/2002 z dne 27. avgusta 2002 o spremembi prilog I, II in III k Uredbi Sveta (EGS) št. 2377/90 o določitvi postopka Skupnosti za določanje najvišjih dovoljenih količin zaostankov zdravil za uporabo v veterinarski medicini v živilih živalskega izvora [4] je treba vključiti v Sporazum.(5) Uredbo Komisije št. 1752/2002 z dne 1. oktobra 2002 o spremembi prilog I in II k Uredbi Sveta (EGS) št. 2377/90 o določitvi postopka Skupnosti za določanje najvišjih dovoljenih količin zaostankov zdravil za uporabo v veterinarski medicini v živilih živalskega izvora [5] je treba vključiti v Sporazum -SKLENIL:Člen 1V točki 14 (Uredba Sveta (EGS) št. 2377/90) Poglavja XIII Priloge II k Sporazumu se dodajo naslednje alinee:"— 32002 R 0868: Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 868/2002 (UL L 137, 25.5.2002, str. 6),— 32002 R 0869: Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 869/2002 (UL L 137, 25.5.2002, str. 10),— 32002 R 1530: Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1530/2002 (UL L 230, 28.8.2002, str. 3),— 32002 R 1752: Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1752/2002 (UL L 264, 2.10.2002, str. 18)."Člen 2Besedila Uredb (ES) št. 868/2002, 869/2002, 1530/2002, 1752/2002 v islandskem in norveškem jeziku, objavljena v Dopolnilu EGP Uradnega lista Evropskih skupnosti, so verodostojna.Člen 3Ta sklep začne veljati 17. maja 2003 pod pogojem, da so bila Skupnemu odboru EGP predložena vsa uradna obvestila v skladu s členom 103(1) Sporazuma [6].Člen 4Ta sklep se objavi v sklopu EGP in v Dopolnilu EGP Uradnega lista Evropske unije.V Bruslju, 16. maja 2003Za Skupni odbor EGPPredsednikP. Westerlund[1] UL L 38, 13.2.2003, str. 18.[2] UL L 137, 25.5.2002, str. 6.[3] UL L 137, 25.5.2002, str. 10.[4] UL L 230, 28.8.2002, str. 3.[5] UL L 264, 2.10.2002, str. 18.[6] Ustavne zahteve niso sporočene.--------------------------------------------------


text:
 10.6.2010
 MT
 Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali tal-Unjoni Ewropea
 L 143/16
 DEĊIŻJONI TAL-KUMITAT KONĠUNT TAŻ-ŻEE
 Nru 23/2010
 tat-12 ta’ Marzu 2010
 li temenda l-Anness II (Regolamenti tekniċi, standards, ittestjar u ċertifikazzjoni) tal-Ftehim taż-ŻEE
 IL-KUMITAT KONĠUNT TAŻ-ŻEE,
 Wara li kkunsidra l-Ftehim dwar iż-Żona Ekonomika Ewropea, kif emendat mill-Protokoll li jaġġusta l-Ftehim dwar iż-Żona Ekonomika Ewropea, minn hawn ‘il quddiem imsejjaħ “il-Ftehim”, u b’mod partikolari l-Artikolu 98 tiegħu,
 Billi:
 (1)
 L-Anness II tal-Ftehim ġie emendat permezz tad-Deċiżjoni tal-Kumitat Konġunt taż-ŻEE Nru 18/2010 tal-1 ta’ Marzu 2010 (1).
 (2)
 Id-Deċiżjoni tal-Kumitat Konġunt taż-ŻEE Nru 137/2007 tas-26 ta’ Ottubru 2007 (2) inkorporat ir-Regolament (KE) Nru 852/2004 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill (3) fil-Ftehim u ħassret id-Direttivi tal-Kummissjoni 96/3/Euratom,KEFA,KEE (4), 98/28/KE (5) u 2004/4/KE (6) kif ikkoreġut permezz ta’ ĠU L 81, 19.3.2004, p. 92, skont il-Ftehim.
 (3)
 Skont l-Artikolu 17(3) tar-Regolament (KE) Nru 852/2004, id-Direttivi 96/3/Euratom,KEFA,KEE, 98/28/KE u 2004/4/KE għandhom jibqgħu fis-seħħ sakemm jiġu sostitwiti permezz tad-deżjonijiet adottati b’konformità ma’ dak ir-Regolament jew ir-Regolament (KE) Nru 178/2002 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill (7). Deċiżjonijiet bħal dawn għadhom ma ġewx adottati.
 (4)
 Id-Direttivi 96/3/Euratom,KEFA,KEE, 98/28/KE u 2004/4/KE għalhekk għandhom jiġu inkorporati fil-Ftehim.
 (5)
 Din id-Deċiżjoni m’għandhiex tapplika għal Liechtenstein,
 IDDEĊIEDA KIF ĠEJ:
 Artikolu 1
 Il-Kapitolu XII tal-Anness II għall-Ftehim għandu jiġi emendat kif ġej:
 1.
 It-test li ġej għandu jiġi mdaħħal fil-punt 54j (imħassar):
 “31996 L 0003: Id-Direttiva tal-Kummissjoni 96/3/Euratom, KEFA, KEE tas-26 ta’ Jannar 1996 li tagħti d-deroga minn ċerti dispożizzjonijiet tad-Direttiva tal-Kunsill 93/43/KEE fuq l-iġjene tal-oġġetti tal-ikel fir-rigward tat-trasport taż-żjut u x-xaħmijiet likwidi bil-massa (ĠU L 21, 27.1.1996, p. 42) kif emendata permezz ta’
 —
 32004 L 0004: Id-Direttiva tal-Kummissjoni 2004/4/KE tal-15 ta’ Jannar 2004 (ĠU L 15, 22.1.2004, p. 25), kif rettifikata mill-ĠU L 81, 19.3.2004, p. 92.”
 2.
 Il-punt li ġej għandu jiddaħħal wara l-punt 54zzzze (id-Deċiżjoni tal-Kummissjoni 2008/654/KE):
 “54zzzzf.
 31998 L 0028: Id-Direttiva tal-Kummissjoni 98/28/KE tad-29 ta’ April 1998 li tagħti deroga minn ċerti dispożizzjonijiet tad-Direttiva 93/43/KEE dwar l-iġjene tal-oġġetti tal-ikel fir-rigward tat-trasport bil-baħar ta’ zokkor bil-kwantità mhux maħdum (ĠU L 140, 12.5.1998, p. 10).”
 Artikolu 2
 It-testi tad-Direttivi 96/3/Euratom,KEFA,KEE, 98/28/KE u 2004/4/KE fil-lingwa Islandiża u dik Norveġiża, għandhom ikunu ppublikati fis-Suppliment ŻEE ta’ Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali tal-Unjoni Ewropea, għandhom ikunu awtentiċi.
 Artikolu 3
 Din id-Deċiżjoni għandha tidħol fis-seħħ fil-jum li tidħol fis-seħħ id-Deċiżjoni tal-Kumitat Konġunt taż-ŻEE Nru 137/2007 tas-26 ta’ Ottubru 2007, ipprovdut li n-notifikazzjonijiet kollha skont l-Artikolu 103(1) tal-Ftehim saru lill-Kumitat Konġunt taż-ŻEE (*). Din id-Deċiżjoni għandha tapplika b’mod proviżorju mid-data tal-adozzjoni sad-dħul fis-seħħ tagħha.
 Artikolu 4
 Din id-Deċiżjoni għandha tkun ippubblikata fis-Taqsima ŻEE, u fis-Suppliment taż-ŻEE, ta’ Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali tal-Unjoni Ewropea.
 Magħmul fi Brussell, it-12 ta’ Marzu 2010.
 Għall-Kumitat Konġunt taż-ŻEE
 Il-President
 Alan SEATTER
 (1) Ara paġna 4 ta’ dan il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali.
 (2) ĠU L 100, 10.4.2008, p. 53.
 (3) ĠU L 139, 30.4.2004, p. 1.
 (4) ĠU L 21, 27.1.1996, p. 42.
 (5) ĠU L 140, 12.5.1998, p. 10.
 (6) ĠU L 15, 22.1.2004, p. 25.
 (7) ĠU L 31, 1.2.2002, p. 1.
 (*) Ma huma indikati l-ebda ħtiġijiet kostituzzjonali.


text:
 7.2.2019
 CS
 Úřední věstník Evropské unie
 L 36/31
 ROZHODNUTÍ SMÍŠENÉHO VÝBORU EHP
 č. 85/2017
 ze dne 5. května 2017,
 kterým se mění příloha II (Technické předpisy, normy, zkoušení a certifikace) Dohody o EHP [2019/197]
 SMÍŠENÝ VÝBOR EHP,
 s ohledem na Dohodu o Evropském hospodářském prostoru (dále jen „Dohoda o EHP“), a zejména na článek 98 této dohody,
 vzhledem k těmto důvodům:
 (1)
 Směrnice Evropského parlamentu a Rady (EU) 2015/2203 ze dne 25. listopadu 2015 o sbližování právních předpisů členských států týkajících se kaseinů a kaseinátů určených k lidské spotřebě a o zrušení směrnice Rady 83/417/EHS (1) by měla být začleněna do Dohody o EHP.
 (2)
 Směrnicí (EU) 2015/2203 se ruší směrnice Rady 83/417/EHS (2), která je začleněna do Dohody o EHP, a která by se proto měla v Dohodě o EHP zrušit.
 (3)
 Toto rozhodnutí se týká právních předpisů o potravinách. Jak je uvedeno v úvodu kapitoly XII přílohy II Dohody o EHP, právní předpisy o potravinách se nepoužijí na Lichtenštejnsko po celou dobu, po niž je na Lichtenštejnsko rozšířena působnost Dohody mezi Evropským společenstvím a Švýcarskou konfederací o obchodu se zemědělskými produkty. Toto rozhodnutí se tudíž na Lichtenštejnsko nepoužije.
 (4)
 Příloha II Dohody o EHP by proto měla být odpovídajícím způsobem změněna,
 PŘIJAL TOTO ROZHODNUTÍ:
 Článek 1
 V příloze II Dohody o EHP se kapitola XII mění takto:
 1)
 Za bod 121 (prováděcí nařízení Komise (EU) 2016/662) se doplňuje nový bod, který zní:
 „122.
 32015 L 2203: směrnice Evropského parlamentu a Rady (EU) 2015/2203 ze dne 25. listopadu 2015 o sbližování právních předpisů členských států týkajících se kaseinů a kaseinátů určených k lidské spotřebě a o zrušení směrnice Rady 83/417/EHS (Úř. věst. L 314, 1.12.2015, s. 1).“
 2)
 Bod 32 (směrnice Rady 83/417/EHS) se zrušuje.
 Článek 2
 Znění směrnice (EU) 2015/2203 v islandském a norském jazyce, která mají být zveřejněna v dodatku EHP Úředního věstníku Evropské unie, jsou platná.
 Článek 3
 Toto rozhodnutí vstupuje v platnost dnem 6. května 2017 za předpokladu, že jsou učiněna veškerá oznámení podle čl. 103 odst. 1 Dohody o EHP (*1)
 Článek 4
 Toto rozhodnutí bude zveřejněno v oddíle EHP a v dodatku EHP Úředního věstníku Evropské unie.
 V Bruselu dne 5. května 2017.
 Za Smíšený výbor EHP
 předseda
 Claude MAERTEN
 (1) Úř. věst. L 314, 1.12.2015, s. 1.
 (2) Úř. věst. L 237, 26.8.1983, s. 25.
 (*1) Nebyly oznámeny žádné ústavní požadavky.


type: wikipedia

text:
Ремо Джацото () е италиански музиколог.
 Известен е със систематичното съставяне на каталог на творчеството на Томазо Албинони, за когото пише и биография.
 През 1945 г., докато съставя каталога и биографията, той композира прочутото адажио в сол минор, което почти винаги грешно се приписва на Албинони. Джацото основава композицията си на фрагмент и басови линии на Албинони, които открива сред развалините на Дрезденската държавна библиотека, разрушена през Втората световна война.
 Библиография
 Il melodramma a Genova nei secoli XVII e XVIII (Genova, 1941)
 Tomaso Albinoni, 'musico violino dilettante veneto' (1671-1750) (Milano, 1945)
 Busoni: la vita nell opera (Milano, 1947)
 La musica a Genova nella vita pubblica e privata dal XIII al XVIII secolo (Genova, 1952)
 Poesia melodrammatica e pensiero critico nel Settecento (Milano, 1952)
 Il Patricio di Hercole Bottrigari dimostrato practicamente da un anonimo cinquecentesco', CHM, i (1953), 97-112
 Harmonici concenti in aere veneto (Roma, 1954)
 La musica italiana a Londra negli anni di Purcell (Roma, 1955)
 Annali mozartiani (Milano, 1956)
 Giovan Battista Viotti (Milano, 1956)
 Musurgia nova (Milano, 1959)
 Vita di Alessandro Stradella (Milano, 1962)
 Vivaldi (Milano, 1965)
 Invito all'ascolto di Vivaldi (Milano, 1984)
 Maria Malibran (1808-1836): una vita nei nomi di Rossini e Bellini (Milano, 1986)
 Puccini in casa Puccini (Lucca, Akademos, 1992) ISBN 88-7096-076-5
 Италиански музиколози
 Италиански композитори
 Композитори на 20 век
 Родени в Рим
 Починали в Пиза


jurisdiction: US

text:
This is an appeal by Wyndol O. Colie from a judgment entered upon a verdict of "guilty" by a jury, under a warrant charging him with accepting bets and making a book on a running race of horses in Montgomery County. Code 1939, Article 27, § 291.
 During the trial of the case, Officer Robert A. Popcke testified, over objection, that the accused on the 2nd day of November, 1948, in conversation with him, gave him the telephone number of a booking establishment where he could place "call-in bets." He testified that this number, Michigan 6475, was written by the defendant on an envelope and handed to him. This envelope was admitted in evidence over objection. The appellant claims *Page 611
 that this testimony of the police officer and the envelope should not have been admitted. This conversation took place only a day before the offense charged. This testimony was later followed up by evidence that Officer Popcke on November 2d 1948, called the telephone number given him by the accused and, after using Colie's name as a reference, placed a bet on a horse. On November 3rd, the officer paid to the defendant, at his request, five dollars for the bet he had lost the previous day. On November 5th, 1948, the appellant paid the officer the sum of $6.40 for winning a bet he had placed two days before at Michigan 6475. The evidence, objected to, was a part of a chain of testimony which proved the charge and it was relevant to the offense charged in the warrant. The telephone number was part of the general scheme of placing "call-in bets." Hitzelberger v. State, 174 Md. 152, 161, 197 A. 605. Even if error were committed in permitting the introduction of this evidence, which we do not find, the accused was not prejudiced by the Court's ruling because when the accused took the stand in his own defense he was asked, by his own counsel, about his conversation with Officer Popcke and he admitted it, saying that he gave the telephone number to Officer Popcke and collected the loss of $5.00 and delivered the winnings of $6.40 as favors to the officer and to the bookmaker. He admitted in his own testimony the statements of the officer, to which he formerly objected. This Court has often ruled that when inadmissible evidence is admitted over objection, if the same evidence is later admitted without objection, the error is harmless. Damm v. State, 128 Md. 665, 669, 97 A. 645; Smith v.State, 182 Md. 176, 184, 32 A.2d 863; Purviance v. State,185 Md. 189, 200, 44 A.2d 474; Courtney v. State, 187 Md. 1, 17,48 A.2d 430; Barber v. State, 191 Md. 555, 563-564, 62 A.2d 616, 620.
 During the trial Officer Popcke was asked what he meant by a "call-in bet," and no objection was made to that question, and the officer explained the meaning of a "call-in bet." The only objection was later to the officer *Page 612
 giving an example of a "call-in bet." This example was not given. As no objection was made, the question is not properly before this Court. Without objection and without an opportunity for the trial court to pass upon the question, there is nothing for this Court to review. Courtney v. State, 187 Md. 1, 4, 5,48 A.2d 430; Davis v. State, 189 Md. 269, 273, 55 A.2d 702, 704. The appellant claims that the officer should have first been qualified as an expert, and a proper foundation should have been laid to show that he had previous knowledge of the operation of such a system for receiving call-in bets. If this point were properly before us, which we do not find, we see no error. Police officers working on gambling cases must of necessity have knowledge of the manner in which race horse gambling is conducted. It is hard to conceive that any police officer would not be able to explain what was meant by a "call-in bet." SeeAllen v. State, 178 Md. 269, 276, 13 A.2d 352; Bratburd v.State, 193 Md. 352, 356, 66 A.2d 792, 794.
 During the trial of the case two police officers testified that a telephone call was made to telephone number, Michigan 6475, which number was given Officer Popcke by the accused, and that an unidentified person answered that telephone and took the bets. The appellant contends that because this call was made out of the presence of the accused, and because there was no identification of the person at the other end of the telephone line, this evidence was not admissible. This telephone conversation was not offered in evidence against the person at the other end of the line as the conversation of that person. In such a case, of course, it would have been necessary to identify that person.Rowan v. State, 175 Md. 547, 558, 3 A.2d 753. Here the evidence was offered to show that the telephone, the number of which was given by the accused, was located at a place where bets were taken over that telephone. The purpose of this evidence was to show that the police placed a bet on horse races with a person who answered the telephone number Michigan 6475, and that was where the accused *Page 613
 told the officer that bets could be placed. Baum v. State,163 Md. 153, 160, 161 A. 244; Courtney v. State, 187 Md. 1, 6,48 A.2d 430.
 The appellant claims that two of the officers testified that the accused admitted taking a numbers bet from Officer Popcke four or five weeks prior to the offense charged here. He contends that this was prejudicial to the accused and there was no connection between the bookmaking and the numbers bet. However, this evidence was a part of a general statement made by the officers about admissions by the appellant of various transactions including the specific one with which he was charged. A motion was made to strike out the whole statement. This motion was entirely too broad and was properly refused.
 Officer Whayland testified that at the time they served the warrant they found in the hip pocket of the accused a billfold with seven one-hundred dollar bills, a driver's license, and other papers. The appellant contends that this testimony should not have been admitted because it prejudiced the jury against the accused. This evidence was properly admitted as one of the links in the chain of circumstances of the case to prove the accused was making a book on horse races. Berger v. State, 179 Md. 410, 413, 414, 20 A.2d 146; Wilson v. State, 181 Md. 1, 3, 4,26 A.2d 770; Jones v. State, 182 Md. 653, 657, 35 A.2d 916. Money is one of the stocks in trade of gambling. Bratburd v. State,supra, 66 A.2d at page 794. Even if this testimony were inadmissable, which we do not find, like the first point discussed in this opinion the accused was not prejudiced by the Court's ruling because he testified under direct examination, by his own counsel, that seven hundred dollars were found on his person. He said he received this from the sale of a car. Damm v.State, supra; Smith v. State, supra; Purviance v. State, supra;Courtney v. State, supra; Barber v. State, supra; Baum v. State,supra. The judgment will be affirmed.
 Judgment affirmed with costs. *Page 614


text:
Is é an calafoirniam dúil uimhir a 98, agus is í an tsiombail a sheasann dó sna foirmlí ceimiceacha ná Cf. Táirgeadh an chéad eiseamal calafoirniam in Ollscoil California, Berkeley, thiar sa bhliain 1950 trí chiúiriam a bhombardú le halfa-cháithníní (núicléis héiliam). Ba é an calafoirniam an séú dúil thrasúránach a sintéisíodh, agus é ar ceann de na dúile is troime a ndearnadh eiseamal inmheáite díobh. Fuair sé a ainm ón stát agus ón ollscoil inar táirgeadh an chéad uair é.
 Is achtanóideach trasúránach é an calafoirniam, agus mar sin, ní díol iontais é nach bhfuil oiread is aon iseatóp cobhsaí amháin aige - dúil radaighníomhach é. Is é 251Cf an t-iseatóp is fadsaolaí, nó tá sé 898 mbliana ar leathré. Níl ann ach tamall beag i dtéarmaí na geolaíochta.
 Miotal lonrach insínte é an calafoirniam, ach tagann smúit ocsaíde air agus é ag imoibriú le hocsaigin an aeir. Tá sé chomh radaighníomhach is nach bhfuil sé furasta taighde a dhéanamh ar a shaintréithe ceimiceacha, ach is dócha go bhfuil sé cosúil leis an diospróisiam, an lantanóideach atá suite taobh thuas den chalafoirniam sa tábla peiriadach.
 Ní féidir teacht ar an gcalafoirniam sa dúlra, cé go bhfuil sé incheaptha go bhfuil iarsmaí mionbheaga de le fáil sna mianraí úráiniam. Is léir nach bhfuil ról ar bith ag dúil chomh tearc, chomh radaighníomhach sin sna horgánaigh bheo. A mhalairt ar fad, is dual don chalafoirniam carnadh sna cnámha agus dochar tromchúiseach a dhéanamh don smior cnáimhe.
 Dúile ceimiceacha
 Achtainíd


text:
Dans le monde de la tauromachie, la arrucina est une passe haute de muleta effectuée de la main droite. Créée par le matador mexicain Carlos Arruza, cette variante du derechazo est très rarement exécutée.
 Description
 La muleta étant soutenue par l'épée, le torero replie son bras droit dans son dos et présente à l'animal sa hanche droite. Puis il esquive la charge en pivotant d'un quart de tour vers la gauche en faisant voler l'étoffe. Ou bien il pivote en sens inverse de la charge en élevant la muleta au-dessus des cornes du taureau. Le taureau s'élance ainsi sur une surface réduite (le tissu dépasse du flanc de l'homme), et le torero peut l'entrainer dans son mouvement. Lorsqu'il l'entraîne en sens inverse, il fait passer l'étoffe en hauteur sur les cornes dressées, ce qui revient alors à une passe de poitrine. La Arrucina autorise un grand nombre de variantes. Elle peut se rapprocher de la « passe militaire » (costadillo), ou de la « dosantina » dans laquelle le matador tourne le dos à l'animal et fait passer la muleta au-dessus des cornes au moment de l'attaque. Carlos Arruza l'exécuta le à Barcelone.
 Notes et références
 Voir aussi
 Passe de muleta


text:
 16.7.2011
 BG
 Официален вестник на Европейския съюз
 C 211/24
 Определение на Общия съд от 23 май 2011 г. — Y/Комисия
 (Дело T-493/09 P) (1)
 (Обжалване - Публична служба - Договорно наети служители - Уволнение - Отчасти явно недопустима и отчасти явно неоснователна жалба)
 2011/C 211/53
 Език на производството: френски
 Страни
 Жалбоподател: Y (Брюксел, Белгия) (представител: J. Van Rossum, avocat)
 Друга страна в производството: Европейска комисия (представители: първоначално J.-P. Keppenne и L. Lozano Palacios, впоследствие J.-P. Keppenne и D. Martin)
 Предмет
 Жалба за отмяна на Решение на Съда на публичната служба на Европейския съюз (трети състав) от 7 октомври 2009 г. по дело Y/Комисия (F-29/08, все още непубликувано в Сборника)
 Диспозитив
 1.
 Отхвърля жалбата.
 2.
 Осъжда г-н Y да заплати направените от него съдебни разноски, както и съдебните разноски, направени от Европейската комисия в рамките на настоящото производство.
 (1) ОВ C 221, 14.8.2010 г.