text: b"DOE/IG-0536\n\n\n\n\n INSPECTION FOLLOW-ON INSPECTION OF\n REPORT THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY\xe2\x80\x99S\n VALUE ENGINEERING PROGRAM\n\n\n\n\n DECEMBER 2001\n\n\n\n\n U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY\n OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL\n OFFICE OF INSPECTIONS\n\x0c U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY\n Washington, DC 20585\n\n December 20, 2001\n\n\n\nMEMORANDUM FOR THE SECRETARY\n\nFROM: Gregory H. Friedman /s/\n Inspector General\n\nSUBJECT: INFORMATION: Report on \xe2\x80\x9cFollow-on Inspection of the Department of\n Energy\xe2\x80\x99s Value Engineering Program\xe2\x80\x9d\n\nBACKGROUND\n\nValue Engineering is a recognized management tool which, if properly implemented and\nexecuted, can streamline operations, improve quality, and reduce costs. Through the use of\nmethodologies such as Value Engineering, Federal agencies are realizing an average of more\nthan $20 in savings/costs avoidance for each dollar spent on performing the value effort.\n\nOffice of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-131, \xe2\x80\x9cValue Engineering,\xe2\x80\x9d requires Federal\ndepartments and agencies to use Value Engineering, where appropriate, to reduce program and\nacquisition costs. OMB also requires Inspectors General to evaluate how well the agencies have done\nin their efforts to implement Value Engineering. In July 1998, the Office of Inspector General (OIG)\nreported the results of its audit of DOE\xe2\x80\x99s Value Engineering program. We found that: (1) the\nDepartment had not implemented an effective Value Engineering program; (2) several major sites had\nno formal Value Engineering programs or processes in place; and (3) some Value Engineering savings\nwere not always supported or were not the result of Value Engineering activities. Management\nconcurred with the audit recommendations and identified actions that would be taken to address the\nfindings and recommendations.\n\nThe objective of our follow-on inspection was to determine if the Department, including the National\nNuclear Security Administration, has taken appropriate action to implement an effective Value\nEngineering program.\n\nRESULTS OF INSPECTION\n\nWe concluded that the Department has not fully developed and implemented an effective Value\nEngineering program as required by OMB Circular A-131. Further, the Department has not taken all\nthe actions it agreed to in response to the recommendations in the July 1998 OIG report on this\nsubject.\n\x0cWe observed that to varying degrees some elements of the National Nuclear Security Administration,\nthe Office of Science, and the Office of Environmental Management employ the use of Value\nEngineering to increase the efficiency and performance of their programs. However, even in these\norganizations, Value Engineering methodologies have not been applied consistently and, for the most\npart, have only been applied to construction projects. As we concluded in 1998, it is our view that the\nDepartment can materially improve the performance of its programs - - - such as reducing acquisition\nand program costs, increasing productivity, streamlining operations, and improving quality - - - if it\nimplements a robust and aggressive Value Engineering program. Our report includes\nrecommendations to address the concerns raised in this report and in our 1998 report.\n\nAlthough an evaluation of the Department\xe2\x80\x99s contractor incentive program was not a direct part of\nour review, a concern was raised about the lack of incentives for contractors to employ Value\nEngineering principles as they operate the Department\xe2\x80\x99s programs. The OIG has issued several\nreports concerning the Department\xe2\x80\x99s performance-based incentive program. We plan to conduct\nadditional reviews of this area in the future.\n\nMANAGEMENT REACTION\n\nManagement concurred with our recommendations and identified corrective actions that, if fully\nimplemented, would be responsive to the recommendations.\n\nAttachment\n\ncc: Deputy Secretary\n Under Secretary for Energy, Science and Environment\n Administrator, National Nuclear Security Administration\n Director, Office of Management, Budget and Evaluation/Chief Financial Officer\n\x0cFOLLOW-ON INSPECTION OF THE DEPARTMENT OF\nENERGY\xe2\x80\x99S VALUE ENGINEERING PROGRAM\n\n\nTABLE OF\nCONTENTS\n\n\n\n OVERVIEW\n\n Introduction and Objective\xe2\x80\xa6\xe2\x80\xa6\xe2\x80\xa6\xe2\x80\xa6\xe2\x80\xa6\xe2\x80\xa6\xe2\x80\xa6\xe2\x80\xa6\xe2\x80\xa6\xe2\x80\xa6\xe2\x80\xa6\xe2\x80\xa6. 1\n\n Background\xe2\x80\xa6\xe2\x80\xa6\xe2\x80\xa6\xe2\x80\xa6\xe2\x80\xa6\xe2\x80\xa6\xe2\x80\xa6\xe2\x80\xa6\xe2\x80\xa6\xe2\x80\xa6\xe2\x80\xa6\xe2\x80\xa6\xe2\x80\xa6\xe2\x80\xa6..\xe2\x80\xa6\xe2\x80\xa6\xe2\x80\xa6\xe2\x80\xa6 2\n\n Observations and Conclusions\xe2\x80\xa6\xe2\x80\xa6\xe2\x80\xa6.\xe2\x80\xa6\xe2\x80\xa6\xe2\x80\xa6\xe2\x80\xa6\xe2\x80\xa6\xe2\x80\xa6\xe2\x80\xa6 3\n\n DETAILS OF FINDINGS\xe2\x80\xa6\xe2\x80\xa6\xe2\x80\xa6\xe2\x80\xa6\xe2\x80\xa6\xe2\x80\xa6\xe2\x80\xa6\xe2\x80\xa6\xe2\x80\xa6\xe2\x80\xa6\xe2\x80\xa6\xe2\x80\xa6\xe2\x80\xa6 4\n\n OMB Policy Not Fully Implemented\xe2\x80\xa6\xe2\x80\xa6\xe2\x80\xa6\xe2\x80\xa6\xe2\x80\xa6\xe2\x80\xa6\xe2\x80\xa6\xe2\x80\xa6. 4\n\n 1998 OIG Audit Recommendations\n Not Implemented\xe2\x80\xa6\xe2\x80\xa6\xe2\x80\xa6\xe2\x80\xa6\xe2\x80\xa6\xe2\x80\xa6\xe2\x80\xa6\xe2\x80\xa6\xe2\x80\xa6\xe2\x80\xa6\xe2\x80\xa6\xe2\x80\xa6\xe2\x80\xa6..\xe2\x80\xa6\xe2\x80\xa6 5\n\n RECOMMENDATIONS\xe2\x80\xa6\xe2\x80\xa6\xe2\x80\xa6\xe2\x80\xa6\xe2\x80\xa6\xe2\x80\xa6\xe2\x80\xa6\xe2\x80\xa6\xe2\x80\xa6\xe2\x80\xa6..\xe2\x80\xa6\xe2\x80\xa6\xe2\x80\xa6 9\n\n MANAGEMENT COMMENTS\xe2\x80\xa6\xe2\x80\xa6\xe2\x80\xa6\xe2\x80\xa6\xe2\x80\xa6\xe2\x80\xa6\xe2\x80\xa6\xe2\x80\xa6..\xe2\x80\xa6\xe2\x80\xa6 10\n\n INSPECTOR COMMENTS\xe2\x80\xa6\xe2\x80\xa6\xe2\x80\xa6\xe2\x80\xa6\xe2\x80\xa6\xe2\x80\xa6\xe2\x80\xa6\xe2\x80\xa6\xe2\x80\xa6..\xe2\x80\xa6\xe2\x80\xa6. 11\n\n\n APPENDICES\n\n A. Scope and Methodology\xe2\x80\xa6\xe2\x80\xa6\xe2\x80\xa6\xe2\x80\xa6\xe2\x80\xa6\xe2\x80\xa6\xe2\x80\xa6\xe2\x80\xa6\xe2\x80\xa6.\xe2\x80\xa6\xe2\x80\xa6. 12\n\n B. OMB Circular A-131 Requirements\xe2\x80\xa6\xe2\x80\xa6\xe2\x80\xa6..\xe2\x80\xa6\xe2\x80\xa6\xe2\x80\xa6. 14\n\n C. Status of 1998 OIG Audit Recommendations\xe2\x80\xa6..\xe2\x80\xa6 15\n\x0cOverview\nINTRODUCTION Value Engineering is defined by Office of Management and\nAND OBJECTIVE Budget (OMB) Circular A-131, \xe2\x80\x9cValue Engineering,\xe2\x80\x9d dated\n May 21, 1993, as an organized effort directed at analyzing the\n functions of systems, equipment, facilities, services, and supplies\n for the purpose of achieving the essential functions at the lowest\n life-cycle cost consistent with required performance, reliability,\n quality, and safety. These organized efforts can be performed by\n both in-house agency personnel and by contractor personnel.\n However, according to the Department of Energy\xe2\x80\x99s (DOE) draft\n \xe2\x80\x9cProject Management Practices\xe2\x80\x9d dated October 2000, \xe2\x80\x9cvalue\n engineering studies are led by an individual trained in value\n engineering.\xe2\x80\x9d\n\n Public Law 104-106, the Federal Acquisition Reform Act of 1996,\n requires Federal agencies to establish and maintain cost effective Value\n Engineering procedures and processes to reduce program and acquisition\n costs. OMB Circular A-131 requires Federal departments and agencies\n to use Value Engineering as a management tool, where appropriate, to\n reduce program and acquisition costs. OMB also requires Inspectors\n General to evaluate how well the agencies have done in their efforts to\n implement Value Engineering.\n\n In July 1998, the Office of Inspector General (OIG) reported the results\n of its audit of DOE\xe2\x80\x99s Value Engineering program. The OIG reported\n that: (1) the Department had not implemented an effective Value\n Engineering program; (2) several major sites had no formal Value\n Engineering programs or processes in place; and (3) some Value\n Engineering savings were not always supported or were not the result of\n Value Engineering activities. According to the OIG audit report, as a\n result, the intended Value Engineering goals of reducing costs,\n increasing productivity, streamlining operations, and improving quality\n might not have been achieved to the fullest extent possible.\n Management concurred with the OIG audit report recommendations.\n\n On June 25, 1999, the Deputy Secretary of Energy announced a series of\n Secretarial reforms to strengthen and improve management of the\n Department\xe2\x80\x99s construction and other major projects. Under the\n Department\xe2\x80\x99s Project Management Reform Initiative, it was determined\n that in order to complete projects successfully, safely and within budget,\n improved project management performance must be achieved. The\n Office of Engineering and Construction Management (OECM), under\n the auspices of the Office of the Chief Financial Officer (now the Office\n of Management, Budget and Evaluation), was established to lead this\n initiative.\n\n\n\n\nPage 1 Follow-on Inspection of the Department of\n Energy\xe2\x80\x99s Value Engineering Program\n\x0c Consequently, the objective of our inspection was to determine if the\n Department, including the National Nuclear Security Administration,\n has taken appropriate action to implement an effective Value\n Engineering program.\n\nBACKGROUND Value Engineering is a management tool that can be used alone or with\n other management techniques and methodologies, such as lifecycle\n costing, design-to-cost, etc., to improve operations and reduce costs. It\n contributes to the overall management objectives of streamlining\n operations, improving quality, and reducing costs, and can result in the\n increased use of environmentally sound and energy-efficient practices\n and materials.\n\n In August 1991, an audit of Value Engineering in the Federal\n government by the President\xe2\x80\x99s Council on Integrity and Efficiency\n concluded that more can and should be done by Federal agencies to\n realize the benefits of Value Engineering. In addition, reports issued by\n the General Accounting Office (GAO) and agency Inspectors General\n have consistently concluded that greater use of Value Engineering would\n result in additional savings to the Federal government.\n\n Under the Government Performance and Results Act of 1993, annual\n performance plans are to establish performance goals and measures\n covering a given fiscal year and provide direct linkage between an\n agency's longer-term goals and day-to-day activities. According to a\n June 2000 GAO report on the Department\xe2\x80\x99s performance plans, titled\n \xe2\x80\x9cObservations on the Department of Energy's Fiscal Year 1999\n Accountability Report and Fiscal Year 2000/2001 Performance Plans,\xe2\x80\x9d\n GAO does not believe the Department has adequately addressed the\n challenge of completing large projects. GAO believes that many of the\n Department\xe2\x80\x99s remedies focus on procedures rather than desired outcome,\n which is to complete large projects on time and within cost estimates.\n\n SAVE, International, is an international society devoted to the\n advancement and promotion of value methodologies, such as Value\n Engineering. SAVE reports that through use of value methodologies,\n U.S. Government agencies are realizing an average of more than $20 in\n savings/costs avoidance for each dollar spent on performing the value\n effort. The Army Corps of Engineers, the Department of the Interior,\n and the Department of State have confirmed that the historical return on\n investment for these agencies from value efforts is $20 in savings/cost\n avoidance for each dollar spent. The Federal Highway Administration\n reported that the Federal Highway program has achieved a return of\n more than $100 for each dollar spent on value efforts during the period\n 1997-2000. The most recent report to OMB by DOE showed $8 in\n savings/cost avoidance for each dollar spent on value efforts in 1998.\n\n\n\nPage 2 Background\n\x0cOBSERVATIONS AND We concluded that the Department, including the National Nuclear\nCONCLUSIONS Security Administration, has not fully developed and implemented\n an effective Value Engineering program. The Department has not\n fully implemented requirements of OMB Circular A-131 for\n establishing and maintaining a Value Engineering program and\n reporting accomplishments. In addition, the Department has not\n fully implemented the recommendations in the July 1998 OIG\n audit report on the Department\xe2\x80\x99s Value Engineering program.\n\n To varying degrees some elements of the National Nuclear Security\n Administration, the Office of Science, and the Office of Environmental\n Management employ the use of Value Engineering to increase the\n efficiency and performance of their programs. However, Value\n Engineering has not been applied consistently throughout these\n organizations and, for the most part, has only been applied to\n construction projects. We believe, however, that the Department will\n not realize the full benefits of the Value Engineering methodology,\n which include reducing acquisition and program costs, increasing\n productivity, streamlining operations, and improving quality, unless and\n until the requirements in OMB Circular A-131 for an effective Value\n Engineering program are implemented.\n\n Although the Department\xe2\x80\x99s performance-based incentive program was\n not part of our review, a concern was raised about the lack of incentives\n for contractors to ensure the use of Value Engineering to reduce the cost\n of construction projects, equipment, systems, services, and supplies.\n The OIG has issued numerous reports concerning the Department\xe2\x80\x99s\n performance-based incentive program.\n\n\n\n\nPage 3 Observations and Conclusions\n\x0cDetails of Findings\n OMB policy states that Federal agencies shall use Value Engineering as\n a management tool, where appropriate, to ensure realistic budgets,\n identify and remove nonessential capital and operating costs, and\n improve and maintain optimum quality of program and acquisition\n functions. According to the OMB policy, senior management will\n establish and maintain Value Engineering programs, procedures and\n processes to provide for the aggressive, systematic development and\n maintenance of the most effective, efficient, economical and\n environmentally-sound arrangements for conducting the work of\n agencies, and to provide a sound basis for identifying and reporting\n accomplishments.\n\nOMB Policy Not Fully We found that the Department has not fully implemented requirements\nImplemented of OMB Circular A-131 for establishing and maintaining a Value\n Engineering program and reporting accomplishments.\n\n OMB Circular A-131 defines minimum agency responsibilities for\n ensuring that systemic Value Engineering improvements are achieved.\n Among these responsibilities are: designating a senior management\n official to monitor and coordinate agency efforts; developing criteria and\n guidelines; providing training; ensuring funding for conducting Value\n Engineering efforts; developing annual plans for use of Value\n Engineering; and reporting annually to OMB on Value Engineering\n activities.\n\n At the time of our review, many of these responsibilities had not been\n implemented. For example, a senior management official had not been\n designated; criteria and guidelines for Value Engineering had not been\n developed; a formal training program for Value Engineering had not\n been established; funds necessary for conducting agency Value\n Engineering efforts had not been included in annual budget requests to\n OMB; annual plans had not been developed for use of Value\n Engineering; and DOE had not submitted reports to OMB in FY 1999\n and FY 2000 on its Value Engineering activities.\n\n A list of the minimum agency responsibilities established by OMB\n Circular A-131 for Value Engineering, as well as the status of the\n Department\xe2\x80\x99s actions to implement the responsibilities, is shown in\n Appendix B.\n\n Responsibility for many of the project management functions performed\n by the former DOE Office of Field Integration, which included\n responsibility for the Department\xe2\x80\x99s Value Engineering program, were\n assumed by OECM. In July 2000, OECM signed a Memorandum of\n Agreement with the Department\xe2\x80\x99s National Energy Technology\n Laboratory (NETL) for NETL to serve as the lead Federal support group\n\n\n\nPage 4 Details of Findings\n\x0c to OECM for Value Engineering initiatives. According to the\n Agreement, NETL will establish and lead a DOE-wide Value\n Engineering Team. NETL will also, among other things, develop/update\n DOE policy and guidance on Value Engineering to establish a strong\n working knowledge of Value Engineering methodology, theory, and\n practices within the Department; develop the Value Engineering chapter\n of the proposed DOE Program and Project Management Manual; host\n Value Engineering methodology training and lessons-learned\n workshops; develop methodologies for computing and reporting Value\n Engineering-related savings; and establish annual and long-term goals\n and objectives for Value Engineering along with performance measures.\n\n1998 OIG Audit Despite the NETL initiatives, we found that none of the\nRecommendations Not recommendations in the 1998 OIG audit report on the Department\xe2\x80\x99s\nFully Implemented Value Engineering program have been fully implemented.\n\n According to the July 1998 OIG audit report, titled \xe2\x80\x9cThe U.S.\n Department of Energy\xe2\x80\x99s Value Engineering Program,\xe2\x80\x9d HQ-B-98-01, the\n Department had not fully developed and implemented an effective Value\n Engineering program. The report recommendations included corrective\n actions to improve the Department\xe2\x80\x99s Value Engineering program, such\n as clarifying the requirement for use of Value Engineering in DOE\n orders and other guidance; establishing annual and long-term goals and\n objectives and performance measures; ensuring guidance adequately\n addresses methodologies for computing and reporting savings;\n expanding application of Value Engineering beyond construction\n projects in order to realize the full benefit of the Value Engineering\n methodology; developing training in Value Engineering; and ensuring\n adequate guidance to implement a Value Engineering program is\n provided to program offices, including guidance on an approach to\n funding the Value Engineering program.\n\n As stated previously, DOE management concurred with the\n recommendations in the 1998 OIG audit report and agreed to take\n corrective actions. Management stated that teams of field, Headquarters\n and contractor personnel had been established and would develop by\n November 1, 1998, an in-depth action plan responsive to the OIG\n recommendations. According to the response, management intended to\n implement as many of the actions as possible by November 1, 1998, or\n have an established schedule to complete the remaining actions.\n\n As of September 6, 2001, however, corrective actions on the 1998 OIG\n audit report recommendations had not been completed. All the\n recommendations were open in the Department\xe2\x80\x99s Audit Report Tracking\n System (DARTS). Actions by the Department to implement\n\n\n\n\nPage 5 Details of Findings\n\x0c recommendations from the 1998 OIG audit report are discussed in\n Appendix C.\n\n The following is the status of selected recommendations:\n\nGuidance Not Clarified According to the 1998 OIG audit report, the Department needs to clarify\nRegarding Use of Value the requirement for Value Engineering in DOE O 430.1, \xe2\x80\x9cLife-Cycle\nEngineering Asset Management,\xe2\x80\x9d (LCAM 430.1), which was issued in August 1995.\n DOE 430.1 required the use of a \xe2\x80\x9c. . . process tool, such as Value\n Engineering, to improve efficiency and cost effectiveness.\xe2\x80\x9d The OIG\n recommended clarifying the requirement for Value Engineering in\n LCAM 430.1 and other Departmental guidance.\n\n We determined that there were two DOE orders containing references to\n Value Engineering that were issued subsequent to the 1998 OIG audit\n report. We reviewed these orders to determine whether either order\n clarified the requirements for Value Engineering. The two orders were\n DOE O 430.1A, \xe2\x80\x9cLife-Cycle Asset Management,\xe2\x80\x9d dated October 14,\n 1998, which cancelled LCAM 430.1, and DOE O 413.3, \xe2\x80\x9cProgram and\n Project Management for the Acquisition of Capital Assets,\xe2\x80\x9d issued\n October 13, 2000. We noted that neither DOE O 430.1A, which\n contained the same language regarding Value Engineering as LCAM\n 430.1, nor DOE O 413.3, which cancelled portions of DOE O 430.1A,\n contained a specific requirement regarding the use of Value\n Engineering.\n\nGoals, Objectives, According to the 1998 OIG audit report, the Department\xe2\x80\x99s Value\nAnd Performance Engineering program \xe2\x80\x9cwas not fully effective because responsible\nMeasures Not officials had not developed adequate policies and procedures and annual\nDeveloped plans as required by OMB Circular A-131, or established goals and\n objectives for the program.\xe2\x80\x9d The OIG recommended that annual and\n long-term goals and objectives and performance measures be established\n for the DOE Value Engineering program.\n\n According to management comments in DARTS, annual and long-term\n goals and objectives and performance measures will be developed by\n OECM as resources become available. OECM officials acknowledged\n that Value Engineering has not been a high priority for OECM. These\n officials attribute this to limited resources in OECM, which assumed\n responsibility for the 1998 OIG audit recommendations and other project\n management responsibilities following the dissolution of the Office of\n Field Integration.\n\n\n\n\nPage 6 Details of Findings\n\x0cValue Engineering According to the 1998 OIG audit report, some field activities had not\nSavings/Cost consistently computed or reported Value Engineering savings. The OIG\nAvoidance Not recommended that Department guidance on Value Engineering\nReported application adequately address methodologies for computing and\n reporting savings.\n\n From discussions with DOE officials at selected DOE sites, we learned\n that some field activities are not consistently computing or reporting\n Value Engineering savings. Although some DOE sites are conducting\n Value Engineering studies, the results of those studies have not been\n uniformly collected by the field offices and reported to Headquarters,\n largely, according to officials at some field sites, because Headquarters\n officials have not asked for the results. We contacted officials at the\n Albuquerque Operations Office (Albuquerque), the Idaho Operations\n Office (Idaho), the Oakland Operations Office (Oakland), the Oak Ridge\n Operations Office (Oak Ridge), and the Richland Operations Office\n (Richland) regarding their Value Engineering activities. Although\n officials at each site reported the use of Value Engineering studies, as\n illustrated by Table 1 below, we were unable to accurately determine the\n savings/cost avoidance resulting from some of these studies.\n\n Table 1: Value Engineering Savings/Cost Avoidance at\n Selected Sites\n\n FY 98 Savings/ FY 99 Savings/ FY 00 Savings/\n Field Site Avoidance ($M) Avoidance ($M) Avoidance ($M)\n 1 1\n Albuquerque 1.5\n Idaho 48.99 47.3 2.99\n Oakland 6.11 0 0\n 1 1\n Oak Ridge 13.88\n 2\n Richland 9.48 74.96 23.35\n Total 79.51 Not determined Not determined\n\n\n\nUse of Value We determined that the focus of current Department guidance\nEngineering Not regarding Value Engineering is on the use of Value Engineering\nExpanded Beyond activities for construction projects, even though Value Engineering\nConstruction Projects has much broader application.\n\n A further review of the two DOE orders with references to Value\n Engineering indicates that the Department\xe2\x80\x99s policy appears to\n emphasize the use of Value Engineering for construction projects,\n\n1\n Site reported that savings/cost avoidance figures were not available for FY 1999 and FY 2000 in a format that\n would allow comparison with FY 1998 figures.\n2\n One contractor reported $23.4 million in savings/cost avoidance resulting from Value Engineering studies.\n Another major contractor was not required to report savings/cost avoidance resulting from Value Engineering\n studies. Therefore, a site total was not available.\n\n\nPage 7 Details of Findings\n\x0c even though the definition of Value Engineering includes the\n analysis of equipment, systems, services and supplies, as well as\n facilities. Specifically:\n\n \xe2\x80\xa2 DOE O 430.1A, which applies to all physical assets in the\n Department, states that the process for physical asset\n acquisition . . . shall ensure, among other things, the \xe2\x80\x9cuse of a\n process tool, such as value engineering, to improve efficiency\n and cost-effectiveness . . . .\xe2\x80\x9d [Emphasis added.] In addition to\n land, physical assets include structures, utilities, motor\n vehicles, equipment and components.\n\n \xe2\x80\xa2 DOE O 413.3, which provides project management direction\n for the acquisition of capital assets, states that: \xe2\x80\x9cValue\n engineering yields the greatest cost savings when applied\n during the planning and design phases of a project. Value\n engineering should also be used during the construction phase\n of a project.\xe2\x80\x9d [Emphasis added] In addition to land, capital\n assets include structures, equipment, and information\n technology (e.g., hardware, software and applications).\n\n We also reviewed the draft \xe2\x80\x9cProgram and Project Management\xe2\x80\x9d\n document and the draft \xe2\x80\x9cProject Management Practices\xe2\x80\x9d document,\n which were issued for review and use by the Department in\n October 2000. As with the DOE orders, the emphasis of these\n documents also appears to be the use of Value Engineering for\n construction projects. For example, the draft \xe2\x80\x9cProgram and Project\n Management\xe2\x80\x9d document states that \xe2\x80\x9cthe optimum timing for the\n use of VE [Value Engineering] is between conceptual and\n preliminary design.\xe2\x80\x9d Meanwhile, in the discussion of when to\n perform a Value Engineering study, the draft \xe2\x80\x9cProject Management\n Practices\xe2\x80\x9d document states that \xe2\x80\x9csince a value engineering study\n can result in recommending some significant changes in project\n direction . . . the optimum timing for a value engineering study is\n between the completion of the conceptual design and the initiation\n of the detailed design.\xe2\x80\x9d\n\n As previously mentioned, OECM has augmented its staff with\n technical expertise from NETL, which has devised a strategy for\n implementation of a Value Engineering program. However, we\n were told by a NETL official that this strategy will not be\n completely implemented until the end of 2002.\n\n\n\n\nPage 8 Details of Findings\n\x0cRECOMMENDATIONS We believe that the Department will not realize the full benefits of\n the Value Engineering methodology, which include reducing\n acquisition and program costs, increasing productivity,\n streamlining operations, and improving quality, unless and until\n the minimum requirements in OMB Circular A-131 for an\n effective Value Engineering program are implemented.\n\n Therefore, we recommend that the Director, Office of\n Management, Budget and Evaluation/Chief Financial Officer, take\n appropriate action to establish an effective Department-wide Value\n Engineering program by:\n\n 1. Ensuring that the requirements of OMB Circular A-131 for\n establishing and maintaining a Value Engineering program, to\n include the accurate reporting of accomplishments, are fully\n implemented, and\n\n 2. Ensuring that the recommendations in the 1998 OIG audit\n report on the Department\xe2\x80\x99s Value Engineering program are\n implemented in a timely manner.\n\n We also recommend that the Under Secretary for Energy, Science\n and Environment:\n\n 3. Designate a senior official with responsibility for executing the\n Value Engineering program for programs and projects under\n the Under Secretary\xe2\x80\x99s cognizance. As a minimum, the\n designated official should:\n\n a. Conduct evaluations of Value Engineering practices at\n Headquarters and field sites and identify appropriate\n corrective actions,\n\n b. Develop and disseminate Value Engineering lessons\n learned, and\n\n c. Establish a cost threshold for capital acquisitions and\n ensure that Value Engineering studies are conducted, as\n appropriate, for acquisitions exceeding the established\n threshold.\n\n In addition, we recommend that the Administrator, National\n Nuclear Security Administration:\n\n 4. Designate a senior official with responsibility for executing the\n Value Engineering program for programs and projects under\n\n\n\nPage 9 Recommendations\n\x0c the Administrator\xe2\x80\x99s cognizance. As a minimum, the designated\n official should:\n\n a. Conduct evaluations of Value Engineering practices at\n Headquarters and field sites and identify appropriate\n corrective actions,\n\n b. Develop and disseminate Value Engineering lessons\n learned, and\n\n c. Establish a cost threshold for capital acquisitions and\n ensure that Value Engineering studies are conducted, as\n appropriate, for acquisitions exceeding the established\n threshold.\n\nMANAGEMENT Management concurred with our recommendations.\nCOMMENTS\n In comments dated November 6, 2001, to our draft report the\n NNSA Associate Administrator for Management and\n Administration stated that NNSA will work with the Director,\n Office of Management, Budget and Evaluation/Chief Financial\n Officer, on the development of policies related to the Value\n Engineering program. Further, NNSA will continue taking the\n measurable steps to implementing a Value Engineering program on\n capital projects managed through the Associate Administrator for\n Facilities and Operations. According to the Associate\n Administrator for Management and Administration, it is the intent\n of NNSA to define and implement an effective Value Engineering\n program and to develop the reporting process to ensure it is an\n integral part of NNSA\xe2\x80\x99s program and project management. He\n stated that NNSA would issue a policy letter in FY 2002 that will\n define the process and reporting requirements for Value\n Engineering efforts within NNSA.\n\n In comments dated December 6, 2001, to our draft report the\n Director, Office of Management, Budget and Evaluation/Chief\n Financial Officer, stated that his Office will continue developing\n policies related to the Value Engineering program, as well as\n taking measurable steps to implement the same program for the\n entire Department in accordance with the requirements contained\n in OMB Circular A-131. Regarding Recommendations 1 and 2, he\n stated that his Office will establish a Departmental Value\n Engineering policy that will meet the requirements of OMB\n Circular A-131 and that is applicable to all the Department\xe2\x80\x99s\n systems, equipment, facilities, services, and supplies for the\n purpose of achieving the essential functions at the lowest life-cycle\n\n\n\nPage 10 Management Comments\n\x0c cost consistent with required performance, reliability, quality and\n safety. Regarding Recommendations 3 and 4, he stated that a\n designated senior official would be responsible for executing the\n Value Engineering program for programs and projects under their\n cognizance. According to the Director, the estimated target for\n completion of corrective actions regarding the recommendations is\n December 2002.\n\nINSPECTOR We believe that the corrective actions identified by management,\nCOMMENTS if fully implemented, will be responsive to our recommendations.\n\n\n\n\nPage 11 Inspector Comments\n\x0cAppendix A\nScope and Our review was conducted during the period June to October 2001.\nMethodology As part of our review, we interviewed Headquarters officials in the\n Department of Energy\xe2\x80\x99s (DOE) Office of Engineering and\n Construction Management, Office of Environmental Management,\n Office of Science, Office of Defense Programs, and Office of\n Procurement and Assistance Management. We also interviewed\n DOE and DOE contractor officials at the Idaho Operations Office,\n the Oakland Operations Office, the Oak Ridge Operations Office,\n the Richland Operations Office, the Savannah River Operations\n Office, the Ohio Field Office, the Rocky Flats Field Office, and the\n National Energy Technology Laboratory. Furthermore, we\n interviewed Federal officials at the Office of Management and\n Budget, the Department of State, the Department of the Interior,\n and the Army Corps of Engineers.\n\n We collected, reviewed, and analyzed extensive documentation on\n the Value Engineering Program, including:\n\n \xe2\x80\xa2 Office of Management and Budget Circular A-131, \xe2\x80\x9cValue\n Engineering,\xe2\x80\x9d\n\n \xe2\x80\xa2 Public Law 104-106, \xe2\x80\x9cThe Federal Acquisition Reform Act of\n 1996,\xe2\x80\x9d\n\n \xe2\x80\xa2 DOE O 413.3, \xe2\x80\x9cProgram and Project Management for the\n Acquisition of Capital Assets,\xe2\x80\x9d dated October 13, 2000,\n\n \xe2\x80\xa2 DOE O 430.1, \xe2\x80\x9cLife-Cycle Asset Management,\xe2\x80\x9d issued in\n August 1995,\n\n \xe2\x80\xa2 DOE O 430.1A, \xe2\x80\x9cLife-Cycle Asset Management,\xe2\x80\x9d dated\n October 14, 1998,\n\n \xe2\x80\xa2 DOE Order 4010.1A, \xe2\x80\x9cValue Engineering,\xe2\x80\x9d dated May 14,\n 1992,\n\n \xe2\x80\xa2 Office of Inspector General Audit Report No. HQ-B-98-01,\n \xe2\x80\x9cThe U.S. Department of Energy\xe2\x80\x99s Value Engineering\n Program,\xe2\x80\x9d dated July 1998,\n\n \xe2\x80\xa2 General Accounting Office Report No. GAO/RCED-00-209R,\n \xe2\x80\x9cObservations on the Department of Energy's Fiscal Year 1999\n Accountability Report and Fiscal Year 2000/2001 Performance\n Plans,\xe2\x80\x9d dated June 30, 2000,\n\n\n\n\nPage 12 Scope and Methodology\n\x0c \xe2\x80\xa2 National Research Council Report, \xe2\x80\x9cImproving Project\n Management in the Department of Energy,\xe2\x80\x9d dated July 1, 1999,\n and\n\n \xe2\x80\xa2 Draft DOE \xe2\x80\x9cValue Engineering Implementation Strategy,\xe2\x80\x9d\n dated June 1, 2001.\n\n The inspection was conducted in accordance with the \xe2\x80\x9cQuality\n Standards for Inspections\xe2\x80\x9d issued by the President\xe2\x80\x99s Council on\n Integrity and Efficiency.\n\n\n\n\nPage 13 Scope and Methodology\n\x0cAppendix B\n OMB CIRCULAR A-131 REQUIREMENTS\n\nThe Department of Energy\xe2\x80\x99s (DOE) draft implementation strategy includes actions that would\nbring DOE into compliance with OMB A-131 requirements. The table below shows the current\nstatus of DOE with regard to the requirements.\n\n Requirement DOE Status\na. Designate a senior management official to There is no written designation, but the\nmonitor and coordinate agency Value Engineering Director, Office of Engineering and\n(VE) activities. Construction Management (OECM), is\n the designated official by virtue of\n responsibilities.\nb. Develop criteria and guidelines for both in-house Criteria and guidelines do not exist.\npersonnel and contractors to identify\nprograms/projects with the most potential to yield\nsavings from the application of VE techniques.\n\n\nc. Assign responsibility to the senior management No one is designated to grant waivers.\nofficial designated pursuant to [a.] above, to grant\nwaivers of the requirement to conduct VE studies on\ncertain programs and projects. This responsibility\nmay be delegated to other appropriate officials.\nd. Provide training in VE techniques to agency staff No formal VE training is provided.\nresponsible for coordinating and monitoring VE\nefforts and for staff responsible for developing,\nreviewing, analyzing, and carrying out VE\nproposals, change proposals, and evaluations.\ne. Ensure that funds necessary for conducting Specific funds for VE efforts are not\nagency VE efforts are included in annual budget included in the annual budget to OMB.\nrequests to the Office of Management and Budget Efforts are funded from the individual\n(OMB). projects.\nf. Maintain files on projects/programs/systems/ OECM does not maintain files on VE,\nproducts that meet agency criteria for requiring the but various field offices keep files.\nuse of VE techniques.\ng. Adhere to the acquisition requirements of the DOE officials state that FAR clauses are\nFAR, including the use of VE clauses set forth in used as appropriate.\nParts 48 and 52.\nh. Develop annual plans for using VE in the agency. DOE does not have annual plans for VE.\ni. Report annually to OMB on VE activities. DOE did not report to OMB on VE\n activities for FY 1999 or FY 2000.\n\n\n\n\nPage 14 OMB Circular A-131 Requirements\n\x0cAppendix C\n STATUS OF 1998 OIG AUDIT RECOMMENDATIONS\n\nIn July 1998, the Office of Inspector General (OIG) issued a report on the results of its audit of\nthe Department\xe2\x80\x99s Value Engineering program. The report, titled \xe2\x80\x9cThe U.S. Department of\nEnergy\xe2\x80\x99s Value Engineering Program,\xe2\x80\x9d HQ-B-98-01, contained recommendations for corrective\nactions to improve the Department\xe2\x80\x99s Value Engineering program. These actions included,\namong other things, clarifying the requirement for use of Value Engineering in DOE orders and\nother guidance; establishing annual and long-term goals and objectives and performance\nmeasures; ensuring guidance adequately addresses methodologies for computing and reporting\nsavings; expanding application of Value Engineering beyond construction projects in order to\nrealize the full benefit of the Value Engineering methodology; developing training in Value\nEngineering; and ensuring adequate guidance to implement a Value Engineering program is\nprovided to program offices, including guidance on an approach to funding the Value\nEngineering program.\n\nAs of September 6, 2001, corrective actions on the 1998 OIG audit report recommendations had\nnot been completed. All the recommendations were open in the Department\xe2\x80\x99s Audit Report\nTracking System (DARTS). The following is the status of actions by the Department to address\nthe specific OIG audit report recommendations as reported by the Department in its most recent\nDARTS status report dated March 31, 2001, and in discussions with program officials:\n\nThe 1998 OIG audit report recommended that the then Director, Office of Field Management:3\n\n\xe2\x80\xa2 clarify the requirement for Value Engineering application in LCAM 430.1 and other\n Departmental guidance,\n\n\xe2\x80\xa2 ensure that recently developed Departmental guidance on Value Engineering application\n adequately address:\n\n \xe2\x80\xa2 procedures on processing proposals\n \xe2\x80\xa2 guidance on those cost savings initiatives that will be acceptable as Value Engineering\n efforts;\n \xe2\x80\xa2 methodologies for computing and reporting savings; and,\n \xe2\x80\xa2 documentation required to support such savings.\n\nIn its DARTS status report, the Department reported that DOE Order 413.3, \xe2\x80\x9cProgram and\nProject Management for the Acquisition of Capital Assets\xe2\x80\x9d and the draft Project Management\nManual were issued for use on October 13, 2000. Additional guidance related to Value\nEngineering is under development and will be included in the final draft of the Manual before it\nis put into the directives review process in October 2001.\n\n\n3\n The Office of Field Management was renamed the Office of Field Integration.\n\n\n\n\nPage 15 Status of 1998 OIG Audit Recommendations\n\x0cThe 1998 OIG audit report recommended that the then Director, Office of Field Management:\n\n\xe2\x80\xa2 Establish annual and long term goals and objectives and performance measures for the DOE\n Value Engineering program, and\n\n\xe2\x80\xa2 Develop, in conjunction with the program offices, a strategy/annual plan that includes those\n programs and projects that may better benefit from the application of Value Engineering\n techniques. Application of Value Engineering should be expanded beyond construction\n projects in order to realize the full benefit of the Value Engineering methodology.\n\nIn its DARTS status report, the Department reported that OECM, which assumed the Office of\nField Integration responsibilities for Value Engineering when the Office of Field Integration was\ndissolved, would accomplish these recommendations as resources become available. We note,\nhowever, that the draft Value Engineering implementation strategy prepared by OECM addresses\nonly capital acquisitions, and, therefore, is not consistent with the 1998 OIG audit report\nrecommendation to expand the application of Value Engineering beyond construction projects.\n\nThe 1998 OIG audit report recommended that the then Director, Office of Field Management:\n\n\xe2\x80\xa2 Develop Value Engineering competencies and training requirements and ensure that agency\n staff involved with Value Engineering application are adequately trained.\n\nIn its DARTS status report, the Department reported that Value Engineering competencies and\ntraining requirements would be integrated into the Project Management Career Development\nProgram, which will be a two-year effort.\n\nThe 1998 OIG audit report recommended that the then Director, Office of Field Management:\n\n\xe2\x80\xa2 Work with the Office of the Deputy Secretary to ensure sufficient guidance to implement a\n Value Engineering program is provided to the program offices consistent with OMB Circular\n A-131. The approach for funding the Value Engineering program shall be included in this\n guidance.\n\nIn its DARTS status report, the Department reported that, in conjunction with the\nrecommendations for clarification of Value Engineering requirements and guidance, the revision\nto the draft Project Management Manual would further develop procedures for implementing\nValue Engineering.\n\nThe 1998 OIG audit report also recommended that the then Deputy Assistant Secretary for\nProcurement and Assistance Management work with the Office of Field Management to identify\nprocurement policy changes necessary to implement the Department's Value Engineering\nprogram.\n\nIn its DARTS status report, the Department reported that this depends on whether any\nrecommendations proposed by OECM are approved and whether the approved recommendations\nrequire any procurement policy changes.\n\n\nPage 16 Status of 1998 OIG Audit Recommendations\n\x0c IG Report No. DOE/IG-0536\n\n CUSTOMER RESPONSE FORM\n\nThe Office of Inspector General has a continuing interest in improving the usefulness of its\nproducts. We wish to make our reports as responsive as possible to our customers\xe2\x80\x99 requirements,\nand, therefore, ask that you consider sharing your thoughts with us. On the back of this form,\nyou may suggest improvements to enhance the effectiveness of future reports. Please include\nanswers to the following questions if they are applicable to you:\n\n1. What additional background information about the selection, scheduling, scope, or\n procedures of the inspection would have been helpful to the reader in understanding this\n report?\n\n2. What additional information related to findings and recommendations could have been\n included in the report to assist management in implementing corrective actions?\n\n3. What format, stylistic, or organizational changes might have made this report\xe2\x80\x99s overall\n message more clear to the reader?\n\n4. What additional actions could the Office of Inspector General have taken on the issues\n discussed in this report which would have been helpful?\n\n5. Please include your name and telephone number so that we may contact you should we nay\n any questions about your comments.\n\n\nName Date\n\nTelephone Organization\n\n\nWhen you have completed this form, you may telefax it to the Office of Inspector General at\n(202) 586-0948, or you may mail it to:\n\n Office of Inspector General (IG-1)\n Department of Energy\n Washington, DC 20585\n\n ATTN: Customer Relations\n\nIf you wish to discuss this report or your comments with a staff member of the Office of\nInspector General, please contact Wilma Slaughter at (202) 586-1924.\n\x0cThis page intentionally left blank.\n\x0cThe Office of Inspector General wants to make the distribution of its reports as customer friendly and cost\n effective as possible. Therefore, this report will be available electronically through the Internet at the\n following address:\n\n U.S. Department of Energy Office of Inspector General Home Page\n http://www.ig.doe.gov\n\n Your comments would be appreciated and can be provided on the Customer Response Form\n attached to the report.\n\x0c"


type: caselaw

jurisdiction: EU

text:
 4.8.2007
 RO
 Jurnalul Oficial al Uniunii Europene
 C 183/11
 Hotărârea Curții (Camera a doua) din 14 iunie 2007 (cerere având ca obiect pronunțarea unei hotărâri preliminare formulată de Obvodní soud pro Prahu 3 — Republica Cehă) — Telefónica O2 Czech Republic a.s., fostă Český Telecom a.s./Czech On Line a.s.
 (Cauza C-64/06) (1)
 (Comunicații electronice - Rețele și servicii - Cadrul de reglementare comun - Întreprindere dominantă - Obligația de interconectare cu alți operatori - Dispoziții tranzitorii - Directiva 97/33)
 (2007/C 183/18)
 Limba de procedură: ceha
 Instanța de trimitere
 Obvodní soud pro Prahu 3
 Părțile din acțiunea principală
 Reclamantă: Telefónica O2 Czech Republic a.s., fostă Český Telecom a.s.
 Pârâtă: Czech On Line a.s.
 Obiectul
 Cerere având ca obiect pronunțarea unei hotărâri preliminare — Obvodní soud pro Prahu 3 (Republica Cehă) — Interpretarea dispozițiilor Directivei 2002/19/CE a Parlamentului European și a Consiliului din 7 martie 2002 privind accesul la rețelele de comunicații electronice și la infrastructura asociată, precum și interconectarea acestora (Directiva privind accesul) (JO L 108, p. 7), precum și ale Directivei 2002/21/CE a Parlamentului European și a Consiliului din 7 martie 2002 privind un cadru de reglementare comun pentru rețelele și serviciile de comunicații electronice (directivă-cadru) (JO L 108, p. 33) — Obligația, impusă de autoritatea națională de reglementare unei întreprinderi care dispune de o putere semnificativă pe piața telecomunicațiilor, de a încheia un contract de interconectare a rețelelor cu un alt operator, în urma unei proceduri administrative care s-a desfășurat în cea mai mare parte înaintea aderării la UE și care nu a fost precedată de o analiză de piață
 Dispozitivul
 În temeiul dispozițiilor tranzitorii ale Directivei 2002/19/CE a Parlamentului European și a Consiliului din 7 martie 2002 privind accesul la rețelele de comunicații electronice și la infrastructura asociată, precum și interconectarea acestora (Directiva privind accesul) și ale Directivei 2002/21/CE a Parlamentului European și a Consiliului din 7 martie 2002 privind un cadru de reglementare comun pentru rețelele și serviciile de comunicații electronice (directivă-cadru), Český telekomunikační úřad era îndreptățită să examineze obligația unei întreprinderi de telecomunicații ce dispunea de o putere semnificativă pe piață, în sensul Directivei 97/33/CE a Parlamentului European și a Consiliului din 30 iunie 1997 privind interconectarea în telecomunicații în vederea asigurării unui serviciu universal și a interoperabilității prin aplicarea principiilor de furnizare a unei rețele deschise (ONP), astfel cum a fost modificată prin Directiva 98/61/CE a Parlamentului European și a Consiliului din 24 septembrie 1998, de a încheia un acord de interconectare a rețelei sale cu cea a unui alt operator, ulterior datei de 1 mai 2004, în cadrul dispozițiilor Directivei 97/33, astfel cum a fost modificată.
 (1) JO C 121, 20.5.2006.


type: wikipedia

text:
La Consejería de la Presidencia, Interior, Diálogo Social y Simplificación Administrativa es el departamento de la Junta de Andalucía encargado de las competencias autonómicas referidas a la asistencia política, técnica y jurídica del Presidente y del Gobierno; protocolo; relaciones entre el Consejo de Gobierno y el Parlamento de Andalucía; estrategia digital orientada a la prestación de servicios públicos; policía autonómica, ordenación general y coordinación supramunicipal de las policías locales andaluzas, protección civil y emergencias, y seguridad; elecciones y consultas populares, espectáculos y actividades recreativas y protección de animales; coordinación de la acción exterior de la Junta de Andalucía en la Unión Europea, de la cooperación interregional, transnacional y transfronteriza y de las políticas respecto a los andaluces y andaluzas en el mundo; diálogo con los agentes económicos y sociales; dirección, edición y publicación del Boletín Oficial de la Junta de Andalucía; asesoramiento y representación jurídicas de la administración autonómica; políticas de comunicación institucional de la Junta en medios de comunicación; portavocía del gobierno autonómico; designación de integrantes de los órganos de gobierno de las autoridades portuarias de los puertos de interés general enclavados en Andalucía; conciencia de identidad del pueblo andaluz y defensa, protección, proyección y promoción de la imagen de Andalucía y de sus valores; coordinación de competencias en materia de víctimas del terrorismo; promoción de las relaciones con las confesiones religiosas existentes en la sociedad andaluza; calidad normativa y simplificación administrativa; gobierno abierto; cumplimiento de los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible (ODS) y la Agenda 2030; cooperación internacional para el desarrollo; relaciones institucionales con el Consejo Consultivo de Andalucía; transformación digital; desarrollo de la infraestructura de telecomunicaciones en Andalucía y la presidencia y asistencia a la Comisión General de Viceconsejeros y Viceconsejeras.
 Recibe este nombre desde el inicio de la XII legislatura (2022-2026).
 El titular de la consejería y máximo responsable es Antonio Sanz Cabello y tiene su sede en el palacio de San Telmo, avenida de Roma, s/n, (Sevilla).
 Historia
 La Consejería de la Presidencia, Interior, Diálogo Social y Simplificación Administrativa fue creada el 26 de julio de 2022, día de entrada en vigor mediante publicación en el BOJA del Decreto del Presidente 10/2022, de 25 de julio, sobre reestructuración de Consejerías.No obstante, sus competencias quedaron corregidas por Decreto del Presidente 13/2022, de 8 de agosto, por el que se modifica el Decreto del Presidente 10/2022, que cambió el artículo 1 de este último, en el que se establece que
 Estructura
 De acuerdo con el Decreto 152/2022, de 9 de agosto, por el que se establece la estructura orgánica de la Consejería de la Presidencia, Interior, Diálogo Social y Simplificación Administrativa,la Consejería se estructura, bajo la superior dirección de su titular, en los siguientes órganos directivos:
 Centrales:
 Viceconsejería.
 Secretaría General de la Presidencia.
 Secretaría General de Interior.
 Dirección General de Emergencias y Protección Civil.
 Secretaría General de Acción Exterior, Unión Europea y Cooperación.
 Dirección General de Andalucía Global.
 Secretaría General de Relaciones con el Parlamento.
 Secretaría General Técnica.
 Oficina Técnica de Apoyo a la Autoridad Competente de los Fondos Europeos Agrícolas en la Comunidad Autónoma de Andalucía.
 Gabinete Jurídico de la Junta de Andalucía.
 Dirección General de Comunicación Social.
 Dirección General de Comunicación.
 Portavocía del Gobierno.
 Dirección General de Administración Periférica y Simplificación Administrativa.
 Periféricos:
 Delegación del Gobierno de la Junta de Andalucía en Almería.
 Delegación del Gobierno de la Junta de Andalucía en Cádiz.
 Subdelegación del Gobierno de la Junta de Andalucía en el Campo de Gibraltar.
 Delegación del Gobierno de la Junta de Andalucía en Córdoba.
 Delegación del Gobierno de la Junta de Andalucía en Granada.
 Delegación del Gobierno de la Junta de Andalucía en Huelva.
 Delegación del Gobierno de la Junta de Andalucía en Jaén.
 Delegación del Gobierno de la Junta de Andalucía en Málaga.
 Delegación del Gobierno de la Junta de Andalucía en Sevilla.
 Entes adscritos a la Consejería
 Están adscritas a la Consejería las siguientes entidades instrumentales:
 Agencia Pública Empresarial de la Radio y Televisión de Andalucía (RTVA).
 Agencia Andaluza de Cooperación Internacional para el Desarrollo (adscrita a través de la Secretaría General de Acción Exterior, Unión Europea y Cooperación).
 Agencia Empresarial para la Transformación y el Desarrollo Económico (TRADE) (también adscrita a la Consejería de Economía, Hacienda y Fondos Europeos) .
 Agencia Digital de Andalucía (adscrita a través de la persona titular de la Consejería).
 Fundación Pública Centro de Estudios Andaluces (adscrita a través de la Viceconsejería).
 Oficina de la Junta de Andalucía en Madrid (adscrita a través de la Viceconsejería).
 Oficina de la Junta de Andalucía en Barcelona (adscrita a través de la Viceconsejería).
 Delegación de la Junta de Andalucía en Bruselas (adscrita a través de la Secretaría General de Acción Exterior, Unión Europea y Cooperación).
 Instituto de Emergencias y Seguridad Pública de Andalucía (IESPA) (adscrita a través de la Secretaría General de Interior).
 Comisión Interdepartamental de Acción Exterior.
 Comisión Interdepartamental para la Sociedad de la Información (adscrita a través de la Viceconsejería).
 Unidad Aceleradora de Proyectos de Interés Estratégico en Andalucía (adscrita a través de la Dirección General de Administración Periférica y Simplificación Administrativa).
 Dirección de estudios y análisis (adscrita a través de la Secretaría General de la Presidencia).
 Dirección de relaciones institucionales (adscrita a través de la Secretaría General de la Presidencia).
 Agencia Andaluza de Promoción Exterior (EXTENDA), (adscrita a través de la Secretaría General de Acción Exterior, Unión Europea y Cooperación).
 Sociedad Andaluza para el Desarrollo de las Telecomunicaciones, S.A. (SANDETEL).
 Consorcio Fernando de los Ríos.
 Referencias
 El contenido de este artículo incorpora material publicado en el Boletín Oficial del Estado, que se encuentra en el dominio público de conformidad a lo dispuesto en el artículo 13 de la Ley de Propiedad Intelectual española.
 Consejerías de la Junta de Andalucía


type: contracts

text:
 Avis juridique important
 |
 22001D0211
 2001/211/ΕΚ: Απόφαση αριθ. 3/2001 του Συμβουλίου Σύνδεσης ΕΕ-Εσθονίας, της 19ης Φεβρουαρίου 2001, για τροποποίηση του πρωτοκόλλου αριθ. 3 της ευρωπαϊκής συμφωνίας με την Εσθονία για τον ορισμό της εννοίας "καταγόμενα προϊόντα" ή "προϊόντα καταγωγής" και για τις μεθόδους διοικητικής συνεργασίας
 Επίσημη Εφημερίδα αριθ. L 079 της 17/03/2001 σ. 0026 - 0028
 Απόφαση αριθ. 3/2001 του Συμβουλίου Σύνδεσης ΕΕ-Εσθονίαςτης 19ης Φεβρουαρίου 2001για τροποποίηση του πρωτοκόλλου αριθ. 3 της ευρωπαϊκής συμφωνίας με την Εσθονία για τον ορισμό της εννοίας "καταγόμενα προϊόντα" ή "προϊόντα καταγωγής" και για τις μεθόδους διοικητικής συνεργασίας(2001/211/ΕΚ)ΤΟ ΣΥΜΒΟΥΛΙΟ ΣΥΝΔΕΣΗΣ,Έχοντας υπόψη την ευρωπαϊκή συμφωνία για την εγκαθίδρυση συνδέσεως μεταξύ των Ευρωπαϊκών Κοινοτήτων και των κρατών μελών τους, αφενός, και της Δημοκρατίας της Εσθονίας, αφετέρου(1), που υπογράφηκε στο Λουξεμβούργο στις 12 Ιουνίου 1995, και ιδίως το άρθρο 38 του πρωτοκόλλου αριθ. 3,Εκτιμώντας τα ακόλουθα:(1) Ορισμένες τροποποιήσεις τεχνικού χαρακτήρα αποσκοπούν στην αποκατάσταση προβλημάτων μεταξύ των διαφόρων γλωσσικών εκδόσεων του κειμένου.(2) Ο κατάλογος των ανεπαρκών επεξεργασιών και μεταποιήσεων χρειάζεται τροποποίηση για να διασφαλιστεί η ορθή ερμηνεία και για να συμπεριληφθούν ορισμένες εργασίες που δεν περιλαμβάνονταν προηγουμένως σ' αυτόν.(3) Θα πρέπει να παραταθεί μέχρι τις 31 Δεκεμβρίου 2001 η ισχύς των διατάξεων για προσωρινή εφαρμογή σταθερών συντελεστών στις περιπτώσεις όπου απαγορεύεται η επιστροφή ή παρέχονται δασμολογικές απαλλαγές.(4) Προέκυψε η ανάγκη για καθιέρωση συστήματος λογιστικού διαχωρισμού των καταγόμενων και των μη καταγόμενων υλών, υπό την προϋπόθεση έκδοσης άδειας εκ μέρους των τελωνειακών αρχών.(5) Οι διατάξεις σχετικά με τα ποσά που εκφράζονται σε ευρώ θα πρέπει να επανεξεταστούν ώστε να διευκρινιστεί η διαδικασία και να εξασφαλιστεί μεγαλύτερη σταθερότητα ως προς το επίπεδο των ποσών σε εθνικά νομίσματα.(6) Για να ληφθεί υπόψη η έλλειψη παραγωγής ορισμένων υλών στις σχετικές χώρες, θα πρέπει να πραγματοποιηθεί διόρθωση στον κατάλογο των απαιτούμενων επεξεργασιών και μεταποιήσεων στις οποίες υποβάλλονται οι μη καταγόμενες ύλες για να αποκτήσουν τον χαρακτήρα καταγωγής,ΑΠΟΦΑΣΙΖΕΙ:Άρθρο 1Το πρωτόκολλο αριθ. 3 για τον ορισμό της έννοιας "καταγόμενα προϊόντα" ή "προϊόντα καταγωγής" και για τις μεθόδους διοικητικής συνεργασίας τροποποιείται ως ακολούθως:1. Το άρθρο 1 στοιχείο θ) αντικαθίσταται από τα ακόλουθα:"θ) 'προστιθέμενη αξία', η τιμή εκ του εργοστασίου αφού αφαιρεθεί η δασμολογητέα αξία εκάστης των ενσωματωθεισών υλών που είναι καταγωγής των άλλων χωρών που αναφέρονται στα άρθρα 3 και 4 ή αν η δασμολογητέα αξία δεν είναι γνωστή ή δεν είναι δυνατόν να διαπιστωθεί, η πρώτη επαληθεύσιμη τιμή που καταβάλλεται για τις ύλες στην Κοινότητα ή την Εσθονία."2. Το άρθρο 7 αντικαθίσταται από τα ακόλουθα:"Άρθρο 7Ανεπαρκής επεξεργασία ή μεταποίηση1. Με την επιφύλαξη της παραγράφου 2, οι ακόλουθες επεξεργασίες ή μεταποιήσεις θεωρούνται ως ανεπαρκείς για την απόκτηση του χαρακτήρα των καταγόμενων προϊόντων, ανεξάρτητα από το αν πληρούνται οι προϋποθέσεις του άρθρου 6:α) εργασίες συντήρησης που εξασφαλίζουν τη διατήρηση των εμπορευμάτων σε καλή κατάσταση κατά τη μεταφορά και αποθήκευσή τους·β) διαιρέσεις και συνενώσεις δεμάτων·γ) πλύση, καθαρισμός, αφαίρεση σκόνης, οξειδίων, ελαίων, χρωμάτων ή άλλων επικαλύψεων·δ) σιδέρωμα κλωστοϋφαντουργικών ειδών·ε) απλές εργασίες βαφής και στίλβωσης·στ) αποφλοίωση, μερική ή ολική λεύκανση, στίλβωση και γυάλισμα δημητριακών και ρυζιού·ζ) εργασίες για το χρωματισμό ζάχαρης και την κατασκευή κύβων ζάχαρης·η) αφαίρεση του φλοιού, των κουκουτσιών και του κελύφους φρούτων, καρπών και λαχανικών·θ) ακόνισμα, απλή λείανση ή απλός τεμαχισμός·ι) κοσκίνισμα, διαλογή, ταξινόμηση, κατάταξη, διαβάθμιση, συνδυασμός (συμπεριλαμβανομένης της σύνθεσης σειρών εμπορευμάτων)·ια) απλή τοποθέτηση σε φιάλες, δοχεία, φιαλίδια, σάκους, κουτιά, στερέωση επί λεπτοσανίδων κ.λπ. και κάθε άλλη απλή εργασία συσκευασίας·ιβ) επίθεση ή εκτύπωση σημάτων, ετικετών, λογοτύπων ή άλλων παρόμοιων διακριτικών σημείων στα προϊόντα ή στις συσκευασίες τους·ιγ) απλή ανάμειξη προϊόντων, έστω και διαφορετικού είδους·ιδ) απλή συνένωση μερών για την κατασκευή ενός πλήρους προϊόντος ή αποσυναρμολόγηση προϊόντων στα μέρη τους·ιε) συνδυασμός δύο ή περισσοτέρων εργασιών που προβλέπονται στα στοιχεία α) έως ιδ)·ιστ) σφαγή ζώων.2. Όλες οι εργασίες που διενεργούνται εντός της Κοινότητας ή της Εσθονίας σε συγκεκριμένο προϊόν πρέπει να εξετάζονται από κοινού, όταν πρόκειται να οριστεί αν η πραγματοποιηθείσα επεξεργασία ή μεταποίηση του προϊόντος αυτού πρέπει να θεωρηθεί ως ανεπαρκής κατά την έννοια της παραγράφου 1."3. Στο άρθρο 15 παράγραφος 6, η τελευταία πρόταση αντικαθίσταται από τα ακόλουθα:"Οι διατάξεις της παρούσας παραγράφου εφαρμόζονται μέχρι τις 31 Δεκεμβρίου 2001."4. Παρεμβάλλεται το ακόλουθο άρθρο:"Άρθρο 20αΛογιστικός διαχωρισμός1. Όταν η χωριστή διατήρηση αποθεμάτων καταγόμενων και μη καταγόμενων υλών πανομοιότυπων και εναλλασσόμενων, συνεπάγεται υψηλό κόστος ή σημαντικά προβλήματα, οι τελωνειακές αρχές έχουν τη δυνατότητα, μετά από γραπτή αίτηση των ενδιαφερομένων, να επιτρέπουν την εφαρμογή της μεθόδου του λεγόμενου 'λογιστικού διαχωρισμού' για τη διαχείριση αυτών των αποθεμάτων.2. Η μέθοδος αυτή πρέπει να μπορεί να διασφαλίσει ότι, για συγκεκριμένη περίοδο αναφοράς, ο αριθμός των παραγόμενων προϊόντων που θα ήταν δυνατό να θεωρηθούν ως 'καταγόμενα' είναι ο ίδιος με αυτόν που θα είχε προκύψει αν είχε υπάρξει φυσικός διαχωρισμός των αποθεμάτων.3. Οι τελωνειακές αρχές έχουν την ευχέρεια να παρέχουν την εν λόγω άδεια, εφόσον πληρούνται οι προϋποθέσεις που κρίνονται αναγκαίες.4. Η μέθοδος αυτή διαμορφώνεται και εφαρμόζεται βάσει των γενικών λογιστικών αρχών που ισχύουν στη χώρα παραγωγής του προϊόντος.5. Ο δικαιούχος της εν λόγω διευκόλυνσης μπορεί να εκδίδει ή να ζητεί την έκδοση πιστοποιητικών καταγωγής, κατά περίπτωση, για την ποσότητα των προϊόντων που δύνανται να θεωρούνται ως καταγόμενα. Μετά από αίτηση των τελωνειακών αρχών, ο δικαιούχος υποβάλλει δήλωση σχετικά με τον τρόπο διαχείρισης των ποσοτήτων.6. Οι τελωνειακές αρχές παρακολουθούν τον τρόπο χρησιμοποίησης της άδειας και μπορούν να την ανακαλούν ανά πάσα στιγμή, εφόσον ο δικαιούχος τη χρησιμοποιεί κατά τον μη δέοντα τρόπο ή δεν πληροί οποιαδήποτε από τις λοιπές προϋποθέσεις που παρατίθενται στο παρόν πρωτόκολλο."5. Στο άρθρο 22 παράγραφος 1 πρώτη πρόταση, παρεμβάλλονται τα ακόλουθα μετά τη λέξη "εξαγωγέα":"(καλούμενος εφεξής 'εγκεκριμένος εξαγωγέας')".6. Το άρθρο 30 αντικαθίσταται από τα ακόλουθα:"Άρθρο 30Ποσά εκφρασμένα σε ευρώ1. Για την εφαρμογή των διατάξεων του άρθρου 21 παράγραφος 1 στοιχείο β) και του άρθρου 26 παράγραφος 3 στις περιπτώσεις όπου τα προϊόντα τιμολογούνται σε νόμισμα άλλο από το ευρώ, το ισόποσο των εθνικών νομισμάτων των χωρών που αναφέρονται στα άρθρα 3 και 4 σε ευρώ καθορίζεται ετησίως από κάθε μια από τις ενδιαφερόμενες χώρες.2. Οι αποστολές υπάγονται στις ευνοϊκές διατάξεις του άρθρου 21 παράγραφος 1 στοιχείο β) ή του άρθρου 26 παράγραφος 3 με αναφορά στο νόμισμα στο οποίο εκδίδεται το τιμολόγιο, σύμφωνα με το ποσό που έχει καθορίσει η σχετική χώρα.3. Τα ποσά που εκφράζονται στο εθνικό νόμισμα μιας συγκεκριμένης χώρας, είναι ισοδύναμα με την αντίστοιχη αξία, στο εθνικό νόμισμα αυτής της χώρας, του ευρώ την πρώτη εργάσιμη ημέρα του Οκτωβρίου. Τα ποσά ανακοινώνονται στην Ευρωπαϊκή Επιτροπή μέχρι τις 15 Οκτωβρίου και ισχύουν από την 1η Ιανουαρίου του επομένου έτους. Η Ευρωπαϊκή Επιτροπή κοινοποιεί σε όλες τις ενδιαφερόμενες χώρες τα σχετικά ποσά.4. Κάθε χώρα μπορεί να στρογγυλοποιεί προς τα πάνω ή προς τα κάτω το ποσό που προκύπτει από τη μετατροπή του ποσού που εκφράζεται σε ευρώ στο εθνικό της νόμισμα. Το στρογγυλοποιημένο ποσό δεν μπορεί να διαφέρει από το ποσό που προκύπτει από τη μετατροπή κατά περισσότερο από 5 %. Κάθε χώρα μπορεί να διατηρεί αμετάβλητο το ισόποσο ποσού εκφρασμένου σε ευρώ στο εθνικό της νόμισμα εφόσον, κατά τη στιγμή της ετήσιας αναπροσαρμογής που προβλέπεται στην παράγραφο 3, η μετατροπή του εν λόγω ποσού, πριν από τη στρογγυλοποίηση, οδηγεί σε αύξηση μικρότερη από 15 % του ισόποσου σε εθνικό νόμισμα. Το ισόποσο σε εθνικό νόμισμα μπορεί να διατηρείται αμετάβλητο, αν η μετατροπή δεν οδηγεί σε μείωση της ισοδύναμης αξίας.5. Τα ποσά που εκφράζονται σε ευρώ επανεξετάζονται από την επιτροπή σύνδεσης μετά από αίτηση της Κοινότητας ή της Εσθονίας. Κατά τη διενέργεια της εν λόγω επανεξέτασης, η επιτροπή σύνδεσης εξετάζει αν επιδιώκεται η διατήρηση των συνεπειών των σχετικών ορίων με πραγματικούς όρους. Για το σκοπό αυτό, μπορεί να αποφασίσει να τροποποιήσει τα ποσά που εκφράζονται σε ευρώ."7. Το παράρτημα ΙΙ τροποποιείται ως ακολούθως:Το κείμενο των κωδικών 5309 έως 5311 του ΕΣ αντικαθίσταται από τα ακόλουθα:">ΘΕΣΗ ΠΙΝΑΚΑ>"Άρθρο 2Η παρούσα απόφαση αρχίζει να ισχύει την ημέρα της υιοθέτησής της.Εφαρμόζεται από την 1η Ιανουαρίου 2001.Βρυξέλλες, 19 Φεβρουαρίου 2001.Για το Συμβούλιο ΣύνδεσηςΟ ΠρόεδροςT. H. Ilves(1) ΕΕ L 68 της 9.3.1998, σ. 3.


text:
 27.8.2008
 LV
 Eiropas Savienības Oficiālais Vēstnesis
 L 228/3
 AR NOLĪGUMU STARP EIROPAS KOPIENU UN ŠVEICES KONFEDERĀCIJU PAR LAUKSAIMNIECĪBAS PRODUKTU TIRDZNIECĪBU IZVEIDOTĀS APVIENOTĀS LAUKSAIMNIECĪBAS KOMITEJAS LĒMUMS Nr. 2/2008
 (2008. gada 24. jūnijs)
 par 1. un 2. pielikuma pielāgošanu
 (2008/692/EK)
 APVIENOTĀ LAUKSAIMNIECĪBAS KOMITEJA,
 ņemot vērā Nolīgumu starp Eiropas Kopienu un Šveices Konfederāciju par lauksaimniecības produktu tirdzniecību (turpmāk – “Nolīgums”) un jo īpaši tā 11. pantu,
 tā kā:
 (1)
 Nolīgums stājās spēkā 2002. gada 1. jūnijā, un tam cita starpā ir 1. un 2. pielikums, kas attiecas uz divpusējām tirdzniecības koncesijām, kuras noteikusi attiecīgi Šveices Konfederācija un Eiropas Kopiena (turpmāk – “Puses”).
 (2)
 Eiropas Savienība 2007. gada 1. janvārī paplašinājās, kad tai pievienojās Bulgārija un Rumānija. Puses vienojās divpusējās tirdzniecības koncesijas pielāgot pēc principa, ka pēc būtības savstarpēji jāsaglabā tirdzniecības plūsmas saskaņā ar preferencēm, kas noteiktas atbilstoši Eiropas Savienības jauno dalībvalstu un Šveices divpusējiem nolīgumiem. Puses veica autonomus pārejas posma pasākumus, lai tādējādi starpposmā nodrošinātu tirdzniecības plūsmu nepārtrauktību.
 (3)
 Puses arī vienojās Nolīgumā konsolidēt desu un atsevišķu gaļas produktu divpusējās preferenciālās tirdzniecības plūsmas,
 IR NOLĒMUSI ŠĀDI.
 1. pants
 Nolīguma 1. un 2. pielikumu aizstāj attiecīgi ar šā lēmuma 1. un 2. pielikumu.
 2. pants
 Šis lēmums stājas spēkā 2010. gada 1. janvārī.
 Briselē, 2008. gada 24. jūnijā
 Apvienotās lauksaimniecības komitejas vārdā —
 Kopienas delegācijas vadītājs
 Aldo LONGO
 Šveices delegācijas vadītājs
 Jacques CHAVAZ
 Apvienotās lauksaimniecības komitejas sekretārs
 Hans-Christian BEAUMOND
 1. PIELIKUMS
 Šveices piešķirtās koncesijas
 Turpmāk norādītās tarifa koncesijas Šveice piešķīrusi minētajiem Kopienas izcelsmes produktiem, vajadzības gadījumā nosakot daudzuma ierobežojumu gadā:
 Šveices tarifa pozīcija
 Apraksts
 Piemērojamais muitas nodoklis
 (CHF/100 kg bruto masas)
 Daudzums gadā
 (tīrsvars tonnās)
 0101 90 95
 Dzīvi zirgi (izņemot tīršķirnes vaislas lopus un lopus kaušanai) (lopu skaits)
 0
 100 lopu
 0204 50 10
 Kazas gaļa, svaiga, atdzesēta vai saldēta
 40
 100
 0207 14 81
 Mājputnu krūtiņas, saldētas
 15
 2 100
 0207 14 91
 Mājas gaiļu un vistu gabali un ēdamie iekšējie orgāni, tostarp aknas (izņemot krūtiņas), saldēti
 15
 1 200
 0207 27 81
 Mājas tītaru tēviņu un tītaru mātīšu krūtiņas, saldētas
 15
 800
 0207 27 91
 Mājas tītaru tēviņu un tītaru mātīšu gabali un ēdami iekšējie orgāni, tai skaitā aknas (izņemot krūtiņas), saldēti
 15
 600
 0207 33 11
 Mājas pīles, nesagrieztas gabalos, saldētas
 15
 700
 0207 34 00
 Mājas pīļu, zosu vai pērļvistu aknas, svaigas vai atdzesētas
 9,5
 20
 0207 36 91
 Mājas pīļu, zosu vai pērļvistu gabali vai ēdami iekšējie orgāni, saldēti (izņemot aknas)
 15
 100
 0208 10 00
 Trušu vai zaķu gaļa un ēdami iekšējie orgāni, svaigi, atdzesēti vai saldēti
 11
 1 700
 0208 90 10
 Meža zvēru gaļa un ēdami iekšējie orgāni, svaigi, atdzesēti vai saldēti (izņemot zaķu un mežacūku)
 0
 100
 ex ex 0210 11 91
 Cūku (kas nav mežacūkas) šķiņķi un to gabali, neatkauloti, sālīti vai sālījumā, žāvēti vai kūpināti
 atbrīvojums
 1 000 (1)
 ex ex 0210 19 91
 Karbonādes gabali bez kaula, sālījumā un žāvēti
 atbrīvojums
 0210 20 10
 Žāvēta liellopu gaļa
 atbrīvojums
 200 (2)
 ex ex 0407 00 10
 Pārtikas putnu olas, čaumalās, svaigas, konservētas vai vārītas
 47
 150
 ex ex 0409 00 00
 Dabīgais akāciju medus
 8
 200
 ex ex 0409 00 00
 Cits dabīgais medus (izņemot akāciju)
 26
 50
 0602 10 00
 Spraudeņi bez saknēm un potzari
 atbrīvojums
 neierobežots
 Sēklaugļu augi potcelma veidā (no stādiem vai veģetatīvās pavairošanās):
 atbrīvojums
 (3)
 0602 20 11
 —
 uzpotēti, ar tīrām saknēm
 0602 20 19
 —
 uzpotēti, ar sakņu kamolu
 0602 20 21
 —
 neuzpotēti, ar tīrām saknēm
 0602 20 29
 —
 neuzpotēti, ar sakņu kamolu
 Kauliņaugļu augi potcelma veidā (no stādiem vai veģetatīvās pavairošanās):
 atbrīvojums
 (3)
 0602 20 31
 —
 uzpotēti, ar tīrām saknēm
 0602 20 39
 —
 uzpotēti, ar sakņu kamolu
 0602 20 41
 —
 neuzpotēti, ar tīrām saknēm
 0602 20 49
 —
 neuzpotēti, ar sakņu kamolu
 Sēklaugļu vai kauliņaugļu augi, kas nav potcelma veidā (no stādiem vai veģetatīvās pavairošanās), ar ēdamiem augļiem:
 atbrīvojums
 neierobežots
 0602 20 51
 —
 ar tīrām saknēm
 0602 20 59
 —
 tādi, kam nav tīras saknes
 Koki, kociņi, krūmi un košumkrūmi, ar ēdamiem augļiem, ar tīrām saknēm:
 atbrīvojums
 (3)
 0602 20 71
 —
 sēklaugļu
 0602 20 72
 —
 kauliņaugļu
 0602 20 79
 —
 tādi, kas nav sēklaugļu vai kauliņaugļu
 atbrīvojums
 neierobežots
 Koki, kociņi, krūmi un košumkrūmi, ar ēdamiem augļiem, ar sakņu kamolu:
 atbrīvojums
 (3)
 0602 20 81
 —
 sēklaugļu
 0602 20 82
 —
 kauliņaugļu
 0602 20 89
 —
 tādi, kas nav sēklaugļu vai kauliņaugļu
 atbrīvojums
 neierobežots
 0602 30 00
 Rododendri un acālijas, uzpotēti vai neuzpotēti
 atbrīvojums
 neierobežots
 Rožu krūmi, uzpotēti vai neuzpotēti:
 atbrīvojums
 neierobežots
 0602 40 10
 —
 rožu mežeņi un savvaļas rožu krūmi
 —
 tādi, kas nav rožu mežeņi un savvaļas rožu krūmi:
 0602 40 91
 —
 ar tīrām saknēm
 0602 40 99
 —
 tādi, kas nav ar tīrām saknēm, ar sakņu kamolu
 Lietderīgo augu stādi (no dēstiem vai veģetatīvās pavairošanas); sēņu micēlijs:
 atbrīvojums
 neierobežots
 0602 90 11
 —
 dārzeņu stādi un mauriņš rullī
 0602 90 12
 —
 sēņu micēlijs
 0602 90 19
 —
 tādi, kas nav dārzeņu stādi, mauriņš rullī vai sēņu micēlijs
 Citi dzīvie augi (tai skaitā to saknes):
 atbrīvojums
 neierobežots
 0602 90 91
 —
 ar tīrām saknēm
 0602 90 99
 —
 tādi, kas nav ar tīrām saknēm, ar sakņu kamolu
 0603 11 10
 Rozes, grieztas, pušķiem vai rotājumiem, svaigas, no 1. maija līdz 25. oktobrim
 atbrīvojums
 1 000
 0603 12 10
 Neļķes, grieztas, pušķiem vai rotājumiem, svaigas, no 1. maija līdz 25. oktobrim
 0603 13 10
 Orhidejas, grieztas, pušķiem vai rotājumiem, svaigas, no 1. maija līdz 25. oktobrim
 0603 14 10
 Krizantēmas, grieztas, pušķiem vai rotājumiem, svaigas, no 1. maija līdz 25. oktobrim
 Ziedi un ziedu pumpuri (kas nav neļķes, rozes, orhidejas vai krizantēmas), griezti, pušķiem vai rotājumiem, svaigi, no 1. maija līdz 25. oktobrim:
 0603 19 11
 —
 kokaugi
 0603 19 19
 —
 tādi, kas nav kokaugi
 0603 12 30
 Neļķes, grieztas, pušķiem vai rotājumiem, svaigas, no 26. oktobra līdz 30. aprīlim
 atbrīvojums
 neierobežots
 0603 13 30
 Orhidejas, grieztas, pušķiem vai rotājumiem, svaigas, no 26. oktobra līdz 30. aprīlim
 0603 14 30
 Krizantēmas, grieztas, pušķiem vai rotājumiem, svaigas, no 26. oktobra līdz 30. aprīlim
 0603 19 30
 Tulpes, grieztas, pušķiem vai rotājumiem, svaigas, no 26. oktobra līdz 30. aprīlim
 Ziedi un ziedu pumpuri, griezti, pušķiem vai rotājumiem, svaigi, no 26. oktobra līdz 30. aprīlim:
 atbrīvojums
 neierobežots
 0603 19 31
 —
 kokaugi
 0603 19 39
 —
 tādi, kas nav kokaugi
 Tomāti, svaigi vai atdzesēti
 atbrīvojums
 10 000
 —
 ķirštomāti:
 0702 00 10
 —
 no 21. oktobra līdz 30. aprīlim
 —
 Pereti tomāti (garena forma):
 0702 00 20
 —
 no 21. oktobra līdz 30. aprīlim
 —
 citi tomāti diametrā 80 mm vai vairāk (gaļīgi tomāti):
 0702 00 30
 —
 no 21. oktobra līdz 30. aprīlim
 —
 citi:
 0702 00 90
 —
 no 21. oktobra līdz 30. aprīlim
 Ledus salāti bez ārējās lapas:
 atbrīvojums
 2 000
 0705 11 11
 —
 no 1. janvāra līdz februāra beigām
 Cigoriņu salāti, svaigi vai atdzesēti:
 atbrīvojums
 2 000
 0705 21 10
 —
 no 21. maija līdz 30. septembrim
 0707 00 10
 Gurķi salātiem, no 21. oktobra līdz 14. aprīlim
 5
 200
 0707 00 30
 Gurķi konservēšanai, garumā > 6 cm, bet ≤ 12 cm, svaigi vai atdzesēti, no 21. oktobra līdz 14. aprīlim
 5
 100
 0707 00 31
 Gurķi konservēšanai, garumā > 6 cm, bet ≤ 12 cm, svaigi vai atdzesēti, no 15. aprīļa līdz 20. oktobrim
 5
 2 100
 0707 00 50
 Pipargurķīši, svaigi vai atdzesēti
 3,5
 800
 Baklažāni, svaigi vai atdzesēti:
 atbrīvojums
 1 000
 0709 30 10
 —
 no 16. oktobra līdz 31. maijam
 0709 51 00
 0709 59 00
 Sēnes, svaigas vai atdzesētas, Agaricus vai citas, izņemot trifeles
 atbrīvojums
 neierobežots
 Paprika, svaiga vai atdzesēta:
 2,5
 neierobežots
 0709 60 11
 —
 no 1. novembra līdz 31. martam
 0709 60 12
 Paprika, svaiga vai atdzesēta, no 1. aprīļa līdz 31. oktobrim
 5
 1 300
 Kabači (tai skaitā kabaču ziedi), svaigi vai atdzesēti:
 atbrīvojums
 2 000
 0709 90 50
 —
 no 31. oktobra līdz 19. aprīlim
 ex ex 0710 80 90
 Sēnes, nevārītas vai vārītas ūdenī vai tvaikā, saldētas
 atbrīvojums
 neierobežots
 0711 90 90
 Dārzeņi un dārzeņu maisījumi, uz laiku konservēti (piemēram, ar sēra dioksīda palīdzību vai sālītā ūdenī ar sēra vai citu vielu piedevu, kas ļauj tos īslaicīgi iekonservēt), bet tādā stāvoklī nederīgi ēšanai
 0
 150
 0712 20 00
 Sīpoli, žāvēti, sagriezti gabalos vai šķēlēs vai arī samalti vai saberzti pulverī, bet ne citādi sagatavoti
 0
 100
 0713 10 11
 Zirņi (Pisum sativum), sausi, izlobīti, veseli, nepārstrādāti, dzīvnieku barošanai
 atlaide 0,9 apmērā no piemērotā nodokļa
 1 000
 0713 10 19
 Zirņi (Pisum sativum), sausi, izlobīti, veseli, nepārstrādāti (izņemot tos, kas paredzēti dzīvnieku barošanai, tehniskai izmantošanai vai alus darīšanai)
 0
 1 000
 Lazdu rieksti (Corylus spp.), svaigi vai kaltēti:
 atbrīvojums
 neierobežots
 0802 21 90
 —
 nelobīti, kas nav paredzēti dzīvnieku barošanai vai eļļas iegūšanai
 0802 22 90
 —
 nolobīti, kas nav paredzēti dzīvnieku barošanai vai eļļas iegūšanai
 0802 32 90
 Rieksti
 atbrīvojums
 100
 ex ex 0802 90 90
 Priežu riekstu sēklas, svaigas vai kaltētas
 atbrīvojums
 neierobežots
 0805 10 00
 Apelsīni, svaigi vai žāvēti
 atbrīvojums
 neierobežots
 0805 20 00
 Mandarīni (tostarp tanžerīni un sacumas); klementīni, vilkingi un līdzīgi citrusaugļu hibrīdi, svaigi vai žāvēti
 atbrīvojums
 neierobežots
 0807 11 00
 Arbūzi, svaigi
 atbrīvojums
 neierobežots
 0807 19 00
 Melones, svaigas, izņemot arbūzus
 atbrīvojums
 neierobežots
 Aprikozes, svaigas, bez pārsega:
 atbrīvojums
 2 100
 0809 10 11
 —
 no 1. septembra līdz 30. jūnijam
 Citādi iepakotas:
 0809 10 91
 —
 no 1. septembra līdz 30. jūnijam
 0809 40 13
 Plūmes, svaigas, bez pārsega, no 1. jūlija līdz 30. septembrim
 0
 600
 0810 10 10
 Zemenes, svaigas, no 1. septembra līdz 14. maijam
 atbrīvojums
 10 000
 0810 10 11
 Zemenes, svaigas, no 15. maija līdz 31. augustam
 0
 200
 0810 20 11
 Avenes, svaigas, no 1. jūnija līdz 14. septembrim
 0
 250
 0810 50 00
 Kivi, svaigi
 atbrīvojums
 neierobežots
 ex ex 0811 10 00
 Zemenes, nevārītas vai vārītas ūdenī vai tvaikā, saldētas, bez cukura un citu saldinātāju piedevas, neiesaiņotas pārdošanai mazumtirdzniecībā, paredzētas rūpnieciskiem nolūkiem
 10
 1 000
 ex ex 0811 20 90
 Avenes, kazenes, zīdkoka ogas, kazenes-avenes un jāņogas vai ērkšķogas, nevārītas vai vārītas ūdenī vai tvaikā, saldētas, bez cukura un citu saldinātāju piedevas, neiesaiņotas pārdošanai mazumtirdzniecībā, paredzētas rūpnieciskiem nolūkiem
 10
 1 200
 0811 90 10
 Mellenes, nevārītas vai vārītas ūdenī vai tvaikā, saldētas, ar cukura vai citu saldinātāju piedevu vai bez tās
 0
 200
 0811 90 90
 Ēdami augļi, nevārīti vai vārīti ūdenī vai tvaikā, saldēti, ar cukura vai citu saldinātāju piedevu vai bez tās (izņemot zemenes, avenes, kazenes, zīdkoka ogas, kazenes-avenes, jāņogas, ērkšķogas, mellenes un tropiskos augļus)
 0
 1 000
 0904 20 90
 Capsicum vai Pimenta ģints dārzeņpipari, kaltēti vai sasmalcināti, vai samalti pulverī, apstrādāti
 0
 150
 0910 20 00
 Safrāns
 atbrīvojums
 neierobežots
 1001 90 60
 Kvieši un kviešu un rudzu sajaukums (izņemot cietos kviešus), denaturēti, dzīvnieku barošanai
 atlaide 0,6 apmērā no piemērotā nodokļa
 50 000
 1005 90 30
 Kukurūza dzīvnieku barošanai
 atlaide 0,5 apmērā no piemērotā nodokļa
 13 000
 Aukstā spieduma olīveļļa, kas nav paredzēta dzīvnieku barošanai:
 1509 10 91
 —
 stikla traukos ar 2 l vai mazāku tilpumu
 60,60 (4)
 neierobežots
 1509 10 99
 —
 stikla traukos ar tilpumu, kas lielāks par 2 l, vai citos traukos
 86,70 (4)
 neierobežots
 Olīveļļa un tās frakcijas, rafinēta vai nerafinēta, bet ne ķīmiski pārveidota, kas nav paredzēta dzīvnieku barošanai:
 1509 90 91
 —
 stikla traukos ar 2 l vai mazāku tilpumu
 60,60 (4)
 neierobežots
 1509 90 99
 —
 stikla traukos ar tilpumu, kas lielāks par 2 l, vai citos traukos
 86,70 (4)
 neierobežots
 ex ex 0210 19 91
 Šķiņķis, sālījumā, atkaulots, fasēts pūslī vai mākslīgā apvalkā
 atbrīvojums
 3 715
 ex ex 0210 19 91
 Karbonādes gabali bez kaula, kūpināti
 1601 00 11
 1601 00 21
 Desas un tamlīdzīgi izstrādājumi no gaļas, iekšējiem orgāniem vai asins; no šiem produktiem un 0101.–0104. pozīcijas dzīvniekiem, izņemot mežacūkas, gatavoti pārtikas izstrādājumi
 ex ex 0210 19 91
 ex ex 1602 49 10
 Cūkas kakls, žāvēts gaisā, ar garšvielām vai bez tām, vesels, gabalos vai plānās šķēlēs
 Tomāti, veseli vai gabalos, sagatavoti vai konservēti, bet ne etiķī vai etiķskābē:
 2002 10 10
 —
 traukos, kuros var iepildīt vairāk nekā 5 kg
 2,50
 neierobežots
 2002 10 20
 —
 traukos, kuros var iepildīt 5 kg vai mazāk
 4,50
 neierobežots
 Tomāti, sagatavoti vai konservēti, bet ne etiķī vai etiķskābē, kas nav veseli vai gabalos:
 atbrīvojums
 neierobežots
 2002 90 10
 —
 traukos, kuros var iepildīt vairāk nekā 5 kg
 2002 90 21
 Tomātu mīkstums, biezenis un koncentrāts, hermētiski noslēgtos traukos, ar sausnu 25 % no masas vai vairāk, ko veido tomāti un ūdens, ar sāls vai garšvielu piedevu vai bez tās, traukos, kuros var iepildīt 5 kg vai mazāk
 atbrīvojums
 neierobežots
 2002 90 29
 Tomāti, sagatavoti vai konservēti, bet ne etiķī vai etiķskābē, kas nav veseli vai gabalos un kas nav tomātu mīkstums, biezenis vai koncentrāts:
 —
 traukos, kuros var iepildīt 5 kg vai mazāk
 atbrīvojums
 neierobežots
 2003 10 00
 Agaricus sēnes, sagatavotas vai konservētas, bet ne etiķī vai etiķskābē
 0
 1 700
 Artišoki, kas sagatavoti vai konservēti, bet ne etiķī vai etiķskābē, saldēti, kas nav 2006. pozīcijas produkti:
 ex ex 2004 90 18
 —
 traukos, kuros var iepildīt vairāk nekā 5 kg
 17,5
 neierobežots
 ex ex 2004 90 49
 —
 traukos, kuros var iepildīt 5 kg vai mazāk
 24,5
 neierobežots
 Sparģeļi, kas sagatavoti vai konservēti, bet ne etiķī vai etiķskābē, nesaldēti, kas nav 2006. pozīcijas produkti:
 atbrīvojums
 neierobežots
 2005 60 10
 —
 traukos, kuros var iepildīt vairāk nekā 5 kg
 2005 60 90
 —
 traukos, kuros var iepildīt 5 kg vai mazāk
 Olīvas, kas sagatavotas vai konservētas, bet ne etiķī vai etiķskābē, nesaldētas, kas nav 2006. pozīcijas produkti:
 atbrīvojums
 neierobežots
 2005 70 10
 —
 traukos, kuros var iepildīt vairāk nekā 5 kg
 2005 70 90
 —
 traukos, kuros var iepildīt 5 kg vai mazāk
 Kaperi un artišoki, kas sagatavoti vai konservēti, bet ne etiķī vai etiķskābē, nesaldēti, kas nav 2006. pozīcijas produkti:
 ex ex 2005 99 11
 —
 traukos, kuros var iepildīt vairāk nekā 5 kg
 17,5
 neierobežots
 ex ex 2005 99 41
 —
 traukos, kuros var iepildīt 5 kg vai mazāk
 24,5
 neierobežots
 2008 30 90
 Citrusaugļi, citādi sagatavoti vai konservēti, ar cukura vai citu saldinātāju piedevu vai alkohola piedevu vai bez tās, kas nav norādīti un iekļauti citur
 atbrīvojums
 neierobežots
 2008 50 10
 Aprikožu mīkstums, citādi sagatavots vai konservēts, kam nav pievienots cukurs vai citi saldinātāji, kas nav norādīts un iekļauts citur
 10
 neierobežots
 2008 50 90
 Aprikozes, citādi sagatavotas vai konservētas, ar cukura vai citu saldinātāju piedevu vai alkohola piedevu vai bez tās, kas nav norādītas un iekļautas citur
 15
 neierobežots
 2008 70 10
 Persiku mīkstums, citādi sagatavots vai konservēts, kam nav pievienots cukurs vai citi saldinātāji, kas nav norādīts un iekļauts citur
 atbrīvojums
 neierobežots
 2008 70 90
 Persiki, citādi sagatavoti vai konservēti, ar cukura vai citu saldinātāju piedevu vai alkohola piedevu vai bez tās, kas nav norādīti un iekļauti citur
 atbrīvojums
 neierobežots
 Visu citrusaugļu, izņemot apelsīnu vai greipfrūtu, sula, neraudzēta, bez alkohola piedevas:
 ex ex 2009 39 19
 —
 bez cukura vai citu saldinātāju piedevas, koncentrēta
 6
 neierobežots
 ex ex 2009 39 20
 —
 ar cukura vai citu saldinātāju piedevu, koncentrēta
 14
 neierobežots
 Deserta vīni, tradicionālie un mistelles traukos, kuru tilpums:
 2204 21 50
 —
 nepārsniedz 2 l (5)
 8,5
 neierobežots
 2204 29 50
 —
 pārsniedz 2 l (5)
 8,5
 neierobežots
 ex ex 2204 21 50
 Portvīns, traukos, kuru tilpums nepārsniedz 2 l, saskaņā ar aprakstu (6)
 atbrīvojums
 1 000 hl
 ex ex 2204 21 21
 Retsina (baltais Grieķijas vīns), traukos, kuru tilpums nepārsniedz 2 l, saskaņā ar aprakstu (7)
 atbrīvojums
 500 hl
 Retsina (baltais Grieķijas vīns), traukos, kuru tilpums pārsniedz 2 l, saskaņā ar aprakstu (7), kura alkohola saturs:
 ex ex 2204 29 21
 —
 pārsniedz 13 % tilpuma
 ex ex 2204 29 22
 —
 nepārsniedz 13 % tilpuma
 (1) Tai skaitā 480 t Parmas un Sandaniēlas šķiņķa saskaņā ar 1972. gada 25. janvāra vēstuļu apmaiņu starp Kopienu un Šveici.
 (2) Tai skaitā 170 t Bresaolas saskaņā ar 1972. gada 25. janvāra vēstuļu apmaiņu starp Kopienu un Šveici.
 (3) Ievērojot vispārējo ikgadēju kvotu – 60 000 augu.
 (4) Ieskaitot iemaksas obligātās glabāšanas garantiju fondā.
 (5) Attiecas tikai uz Nolīguma 7. pielikumā norādītajiem produktiem.
 (6) Apraksts: “portvīns” ir kvalitatīvs vīns, kas ražots noteiktā reģionā (Portu, Portugāle) saskaņā ar Regulu (EK) Nr. 1493/1999.
 (7) Apraksts: “retsina” ir galda vīns to Kopienas noteikumu izpratnē, kas minēti Regulas (EK) Nr. 1493/1999 VII pielikuma A.2. punktā.
 2. PIELIKUMS
 Kopienas piešķirtās koncesijas
 Turpmāk norādītās tarifa koncesijas Kopiena piešķīrusi minētajiem Šveices izcelsmes produktiem, vajadzības gadījumā nosakot daudzuma ierobežojumu gadā:
 KN kods
 Apraksts
 Piemērojamais muitas nodoklis
 (EUR/100 kg neto masas)
 Apjoms gadā
 (tīrās masas tonnās)
 0102 90 41
 0102 90 49
 0102 90 51
 0102 90 59
 0102 90 61
 0102 90 69
 0102 90 71
 0102 90 79
 Dzīvi liellopi, kuru masa pārsniedz 160 kg
 0
 4 600 lopu
 ex 0210 20 90
 Liellopu gaļa, atkaulota, žāvēta
 atbrīvojums
 1 200
 ex 0401 30
 Krējums, kura taukvielu saturs pārsniedz 6 %
 atbrīvojums
 2 000
 0403 10
 Jogurts
 0402 29 11
 ex 0404 90 83
 Speciālais piens zīdaiņiem, hermētiski noslēgtos traukos ar neto tilpumu, kas nepārsniedz 500 g, ar tauku saturu, kas pārsniedz 10 % (1)
 43,8
 neierobežots
 0602
 Citi dzīvi augi (tai skaitā to saknes), spraudeņi un potzari; sēņu micēlijs
 atbrīvojums
 neierobežots
 0603 11 00
 0603 12 00
 0603 13 00
 0603 14 00
 0603 19
 Ziedi vai pumpuri, griezti, pušķiem vai rotājumiem, svaigi
 atbrīvojums
 neierobežots
 0701 10 00
 Sēklas kartupeļi, svaigi vai atdzesēti
 atbrīvojums
 4 000
 0702 00 00
 Tomāti, svaigi vai atdzesēti
 atbrīvojums (2)
 1 000
 0703 10 19
 0703 90 00
 Sīpoli, kas nav sēklas sīpoli, puravi un citi ķiplokveidīgi augi, svaigi vai atdzesēti
 atbrīvojums
 5 000
 0704 10 00
 0704 90
 Kāposti, ziedkāposti, Ķīnas kāposti, kolrābji un līdzīgi Brasikas ģints ēdami augi, izņemot Briseles kāpostus, svaigi vai atdzesēti
 atbrīvojums
 5 500
 0705
 Lapu salāti (Lactuca sativa) un cigoriņi (Cichorium spp.), svaigi vai atdzesēti
 atbrīvojums
 3 000
 0706 10 00
 Burkāni un bietes, svaigi vai atdzesēti
 atbrīvojums
 5 000
 0706 90 10
 0706 90 90
 Salātu bietes, plostbārži, selerijas saknes, redīsi un līdzīgas ēdamas saknes, izņemot mārrutkus (Cochlearia armoracia), svaigi vai atdzesēti
 atbrīvojums
 3 000
 0707 00 05
 Gurķi, svaigi vai atdzesēti
 atbrīvojums (2)
 1 000
 0708 20 00
 Pupiņas (Vigna spp., Phaseolus spp.), svaigas vai atdzesētas
 atbrīvojums
 1 000
 0709 30 00
 Baklažāni, svaigi vai atdzesēti
 atbrīvojums
 500
 0709 40 00
 Selerijas, kas nav selerijas saknes, svaigas vai atdzesētas
 atbrīvojums
 500
 0709 51 00
 0709 59
 Sēnes un trifeles, svaigas vai atdzesētas
 atbrīvojums
 neierobežots
 0709 70 00
 Spināti, tetragoni (Jaunzēlandes spināti) un arroches (milzu spināti), svaigi vai atdzesēti
 atbrīvojums
 1 000
 0709 90 10
 Salāti, kas nav lapu salāti (Lactuca sativa) un cigoriņi (Cichorium spp.), svaigi vai atdzesēti
 atbrīvojums
 1 000
 0709 90 20
 Mangoldi (jeb lapu bietes) un lapu artišoki
 atbrīvojums
 300
 0709 90 50
 Fenheļi, svaigi vai atdzesēti
 atbrīvojums
 1 000
 0709 90 70
 Kabači, svaigi vai atdzesēti
 atbrīvojums (2)
 1 000
 0709 90 90
 Citi dārzeņi, svaigi vai atdzesēti
 atbrīvojums
 1 000
 0710 80 61
 0710 80 69
 Sēnes, nevārītas vai vārītas ūdenī vai tvaikā, saldētas
 atbrīvojums
 neierobežots
 0712 90
 Kaltēti dārzeņi, veseli, gabalos, šķēlēs, saberzti vai samalti pulverī, iegūti vai neiegūti no vārītiem, bet ne citādi sagatavotiem dārzeņiem, izņemot sīpolus, sēnes un trifeles
 atbrīvojums
 neierobežots
 ex 0808 10 80
 Āboli, kas nav sidra āboli, svaigi
 atbrīvojums (2)
 3 000
 0808 20
 Bumbieri un cidonijas, svaigi
 atbrīvojums (2)
 3 000
 0809 10 00
 Aprikozes, svaigas
 atbrīvojums (2)
 500
 0809 20 95
 Ķirši, kas nav skābie ķirši (Prunus cerasus), svaigi
 atbrīvojums (2)
 1 500 (2)
 0809 40
 Plūmes un meža plūmes, svaigas
 atbrīvojums (2)
 1 000
 0810 10 00
 Zemenes
 atbrīvojums
 200
 0810 20 10
 Avenes, svaigas
 atbrīvojums
 100
 0810 20 90
 Kazenes, zīdkoka ogas un kazenes-avenes, svaigas
 atbrīvojums
 100
 1106 30 10
 Banānu milti, putraimi un pulveri
 atbrīvojums
 5
 1106 30 90
 Citu 8. nodaļā minēto augļu milti, putraimi un pulveri
 atbrīvojums
 neierobežots
 ex 0210 19 50
 Šķiņķis, sālījumā, atkaulots, fasēts pūslī vai mākslīgā apvalkā
 atbrīvojums
 1 900
 ex 0210 19 81
 Karbonādes gabali bez kaula, kūpināti
 ex 1601 00
 Desas un tamlīdzīgi izstrādājumi no gaļas, iekšējiem orgāniem vai asins; no šiem produktiem un 0101.–0104. pozīcijas dzīvniekiem, izņemot mežacūkas, gatavoti pārtikas izstrādājumi
 ex 0210 19 81
 ex 1602 49 19
 Cūkas kakls, žāvēts gaisā, ar garšvielām vai bez tām, vesels, gabalos vai plānās šķēlēs
 ex 2002 90 91
 ex 2002 90 99
 Tomātu pulveris, ar cukura, citu saldinātāju vai cietes piedevu vai bez tās (4)
 atbrīvojums
 neierobežots
 2003 90 00
 Sēnes, kas nav Agaricus sēnes, sagatavotas vai konservētas, bet ne etiķī vai etiķskābē
 atbrīvojums
 neierobežots
 0710 10 00
 Kartupeļi, nevārīti vai vārīti ūdenī vai tvaikā, saldēti
 atbrīvojums
 3 000
 2004 10 10
 2004 10 99
 Kartupeļi, kas sagatavoti vai konservēti, bet ne etiķī vai etiķskābē, saldēti, kas nav 2006. pozīcijas produkti, izņemot miltus, putraimus vai pārslas
 2005 20 80
 Kartupeļi, sagatavoti vai konservēti, bet ne etiķī vai etiķskābē, nesaldēti, kas nav 2006. pozīcijas produkti, izņemot izstrādājumus miltu, putraimu vai pārslu veidā un izstrādājumus plānās šķēlēs, ceptus, sālītus vai aromatizētus vai ne, hermētiski noslēgtos iepakojumos, gatavi tūlītējai patērēšanai
 ex 2005 91 00
 ex 2005 99
 Dārzeņu un dārzeņu maisījumu pulveri, ar cukura, citu saldinātāju vai cietes piedevu vai bez tās (4)
 atbrīvojums
 neierobežots
 ex 2008 30
 Citrusaugļu pārslas un pulveri, ar cukura, citu saldinātāju vai cietes piedevu vai bez tās (4)
 atbrīvojums
 neierobežots
 ex 2008 40
 Bumbieru pārslas un pulveri, ar cukura, citu saldinātāju vai cietes piedevu vai bez tās (4)
 atbrīvojums
 neierobežots
 ex 2008 50
 Aprikožu pārslas un pulveri, ar cukura, citu saldinātāju vai cietes piedevu vai bez tās (4)
 atbrīvojums
 neierobežots
 2008 60
 Ķirši, citādi sagatavoti vai konservēti, ar cukura, citu saldinātāju vai alkohola piedevu vai bez tās, kas nav norādīti un iekļauti citur
 atbrīvojums
 500
 ex 0811 90 19
 ex 0811 90 39
 Ķirši, nevārīti vai vārīti ūdenī vai tvaikā, saldēti, ar cukura vai citu saldinātāju piedevu
 0811 90 80
 Saldie ķirši, nevārīti vai vārīti ūdenī vai tvaikā, saldēti, bez cukura vai citu saldinātāju piedevas
 ex 2008 70
 Persiku pārslas un pulveri, ar cukura, citu saldinātāju vai cietes piedevu vai bez tās (4)
 atbrīvojums
 neierobežots
 ex 2008 80
 Zemeņu pārslas un pulveri, ar cukura, citu saldinātāju vai cietes piedevu vai bez tās (4)
 atbrīvojums
 neierobežots
 ex 2008 99
 Citu augļu pārslas un pulveri, ar cukura, citu saldinātāju vai cietes piedevu vai bez tās (4)
 atbrīvojums
 neierobežots
 ex 2009 19
 Apelsīnu sulas pulveris, ar cukura vai citu saldinātāju piedevu vai bez tās
 atbrīvojums
 neierobežots
 ex 2009 21 00
 ex 2009 29
 Greipfrūtu sulas pulveris, ar cukura vai citu saldinātāju piedevu vai bez tās
 atbrīvojums
 neierobežots
 ex 2009 31
 ex 2009 39
 Citu citrusaugļu sulas pulveris, ar cukura vai citu saldinātāju piedevu vai bez tās
 atbrīvojums
 neierobežots
 ex 2009 41
 ex 2009 49
 Ananasu sulas pulveris, ar cukura vai citu saldinātāju piedevu vai bez tās
 atbrīvojums
 neierobežots
 ex 2009 71
 ex 2009 79
 Ābolu sulas pulveris, ar cukura vai citu saldinātāju piedevu vai bez tās
 atbrīvojums
 neierobežots
 ex 2009 80
 Citu augļu vai dārzeņu sulas pulveris, ar cukura vai citu saldinātāju piedevu vai bez tās
 atbrīvojums
 neierobežots
 (1) Attiecībā uz šīs apakšpozīcijas produktiem “speciālais piens zīdaiņiem” ir produkti, kuros nav patogēnu un toksikogēnu mikroorganismu un kuri satur mazāk nekā 10 000 reaktivējamo aerobo baktēriju un mazāk nekā divas kolibaktērijas vienā gramā.
 (2) Attiecīgā gadījumā piemērojams īpašs, nevis minimālais nodoklis.
 (3) Tai skaitā 1 000 t saskaņā ar 1986. gada 14. jūlija vēstuļu apmaiņu.
 (4) Skatīt kopīgo deklarāciju par dārzeņu un augļu pulveru tarifu klasifikāciju.


text:
 4.7.2016
 CS
 Úřední věstník Evropské unie
 C 243/50
 Žaloba podaná dne 13. května 2016 – Janukovyč v. Rada
 (Věc T-245/16)
 (2016/C 243/56)
 Jednací jazyk: angličtina
 Účastníci řízení
 Žalobce: Oleksandr Viktorovyč Janukovyč (Donětsk, Ukrajina) (zástupce: T. Beazley, QC)
 Žalovaná: Rada Evropské unie
 Návrhová žádání
 Žalobce navrhuje, aby Tribunál:
 —
 Zrušil rozhodnutí Rady (SZBP) 2016/318 ze dne 4. března 2016, kterým se mění rozhodnutí 2014/119/SZBP o omezujících opatřeních vůči některým osobám, subjektům a orgánům vzhledem k situaci na Ukrajině (Úř. věst. 2016, L 60, s. 76), v rozsahu, v němž se vztahuje na žalobce,
 —
 zrušil prováděcí nařízení Rady (EU) 2016/311 ze dne 4. března 2016, kterým se provádí nařízení (EU) č. 208/2014 o omezujících opatřeních vůči některým osobám, subjektům a orgánům vzhledem k situaci na Ukrajině (Úř. věst. 2016, L 60, s. 1), jelikož nezrušilo nařízení č. 208/2044 v rozsahu, v němž se vztahuje na žalobce, a
 —
 uložil Radě náhradu nákladů řízení.
 Žalobní důvody a hlavní argumenty
 Na podporu žaloby předkládá žalobce sedm žalobních důvodů.
 1.
 První žalobní důvod, vycházející z toho, že Rada Evropské unie (dále jen „Rada“) neměla řádný právní základ pro sporná opatření. Argumenty na podporu tohoto žalobního důvodu a dalších žalobních důvodů zahrnují následující. Podmínky pro to, aby se Rada mohla opřít o článek 29 SEU, sporná opatření nesplňovala. Tato opatření byla v rozporu s cíli výslovně stanovenými v rozhodnutí Rady (SZBP) 2016/318 (právní stát a dodržování lidských práv na Ukrajině). Sporná opatření totiž porušují zásady právního státu a lidská práva tím, že podporují režim, který nemá minulost spojenou s dodržováním lidských práv a zásad právního státu. Rada nemůže důvěřovat rozhodnutím ukrajinských státních zastupitelství nebo soudů, jelikož nejsou nezávislá, ani nestranná, a jsou ovlivněna politickými zásahy ze strany současného režimu na Ukrajině. Presumpce neviny, na kterou má žalobce nárok, byla opakovaně ukrajinskými orgány porušena.
 2.
 Druhý žalobní důvod, vycházející z toho, že Rada zneužila své pravomoci. Skutečným cílem sledovaným Radou při provádění sporných opatření bylo a je podbízet se současnému režimu na Ukrajině a maximalizovat svůj politický vliv na tento režim, což nepřestavuje správné použití dotyčných pravomocí.
 3.
 Třetí žalobní důvod, vycházející z toho, že Rada neuvedla řádné nebo dostatečné odůvodnění a odvolávala se pouze na konvenční a nepřesná tvrzení.
 4.
 Čtvrtý žalobní důvod, vycházející z toho, že žalobce nesplňuje kritéria stanovená pro osobu, která může být zařazena na seznam. Informace, ze kterých Rada vycházela, neměly dostatečně pevný faktický základ pro zařazení žalobce na seznam.
 5.
 Pátý žalobní důvod, vycházející z toho, že se Rada dopustila zjevně nesprávného posouzení tím, že žalobce zahrnula do sporných opatření. Rada neměla konkrétní, věcně spolehlivé a konzistentní důkazy pro odůvodnění sporných opatření a omezené informace, jež měla k dispozici, dostatečně přísně nepřezkoumala.
 6.
 Šestý žalobní důvod, vycházející z toho, že bylo porušeno právo žalobce na obhajobu a že mu byla odepřena účinná soudní ochrana. Rada mimo jiné s žalobcem sporná opatření před jejich přijetím odpovídajícím způsobem nezkonzultovala a žalobci nebyla poskytnuta řádná či spravedlivá příležitost buď pro opravu chyb, nebo k předložení relevantních informací.
 7.
 Sedmý žalobní důvod, vycházející z toho, že bylo porušeno právo žalobce na vlastnictví podle čl. 17 odst. 1 Listiny základních práv EU.