type: other

text:
Pagrindinis Veikla Tarptautiniai projektai „Kurk, kad išliktum“
 „Kurk, kad išliktum“ PDF
 Šiais metais Zarasų rajono savivaldybės kultūros centras kartu su Daugpilio rajono savivaldybės Kultūros skyriumi vasaros sezoną pradeda su gaiviais naujo kūrybiško projekto vėjais. „Kurk, kad išliktum“ – tai jo pavadinimas ir pagrindinė idėja. Projekto tikslinė grupė – Zarasų ir Daugpilio rajonų atskirtų teritorijų gyventojai, o tikslas – padėti šiems žmonėms tapti aktyviais, kūrybiškais, versliais ir socialiais, labiau patenkintais savo gyvenamąja vieta.
 Šių metų birželio 21 d. projekto koordinacinė grupė iš Zarasų ir Daugpilio susitiks pirmajame projekto susitikime Zarasų rajono savivaldybės kultūros centre ir aptars projekto įgyvendinimo klausimus, pagrindines veiklas ir pirmojo projekto periodo uždavinius. Trumpai tariant, štai ko būsimi projekto dalyviai gali tikėtis iš projekto ir kur ruoštis dalyvauti (Lietuvos pusėje):
 Šių metų birželio 26-27 d. konferencija „Kaip kultūros organizacijos gali prisidėti prie geresnių ekonominių ir socialinių sąlygų kūrimo atskirtose teritorijose“ Smalvų sodyboje (Zarasų rajone), kuri ir skelbs projekto pradžią ir suburs kultūros organizacijų, valdžios atstovus, startuolius, menininkus ir kitus žmones dalintis gerąja patirtimi, kaip pasitelkiant kūrybinį požiūrį sėkmingiau parduoti savo kuriamus darbus ir kaip kultūros organizacijos gali prisidėti sprendžiant emigracijos problemas ir kuriant geresnes ekonomines ir socialines sąlygas atskirtose teritorijose Zarasų ir Daugpilio rajonuose;
 Kūrybiniai užsiėmimai Zarasų rajono savivaldybės kultūros centre nuo 2019 m. vasario mėn., kuriuose atskirtų teritorijų gyventojau turės galimybę išmokti amatų ir menų, tokių kaip keramika, pynimas iš vytelių, fotografija, DJ-avimas, scenos aptarnavimo darbai (šviesos ir garso operatoriams). Transportas dalyviams iš Turmanto, Avilių ir Suvieko bus suteiktas nemokamai;
 Šeimos festivaliai Turmante, Aviliuose ir Suvieke 2019 m. gegužės mėn., skirti Tarptautinei šeimos dienai paminėti. Profesionalūs režisieriai ir renginių vedėjai dirbs su vietinėmis bendruomenėmis ir antprofesionalios kilnojamos scenos pristatys įdomiausias legendas ir istorinius faktus apie atskirtas teritorijas. Festivalių metu bus organizuojamos edukacinės programos šeimoms, pramoginės programos vaikams ir diskotekos jaunimui. Transportas atskirtų teritorijų bendruomenėms bus suteiktas nemokamai tam, kad galėtų aplankyti nuo jų gyvenamosios vietos nutolusius renginius (pavyzdžiui Avilių ir Suvieko gyventojau galės nemokamai nukeliauti į Šeimos festivalį Turmante autobusu).
 Projekto partneriai tiki, kad kūrybiškumas gali prisidėti prie emigracijos, bedarbystės ir socialinės atskirties problemų sprendimo ir padėti žmonėms veikti, kurti ir socializuotis, pagerinti savo gyvenimo sąlygas, įgūdžius bei tapti labiau patenkintais Zarasų ir Daugpilio regionais. „Kurk, kad išliktum“ žemėje, kuriai priklausai.
 Pavadinimas: Daugpilio ir Zarasų rajonų atskirtų teritorijų gyventojų kūrybiškumo, aktyvumo ir verslumo skatinimas, pasitelkiant sociokultūrines priemones (Kurk, kad išliktum), projekto Nr. LLI-337
 Projekto biudžetas 227 187,00 Eur
 Europos regioninės plėtros fondo (ERDF) finansavimas 193 108,95 Eur
 Zarasai and Daugavpils regions unite for creating to remain
 This year Centre of Culture of Zarasai Municipality together with Culture Department of Daugavpils District Municipality start the summer season with refreshing breeze of the new creative project. “Create to remain” – is the name and the main idea of it. The main target group of all project activities is people who are inhabitants of deprived territories in Zarasai and Daugavpils regions and the main purpose is to make those people more active, creative, more business and socially oriented, more satisfied with area they live.
 On 21st of June, 2018 project coordination groups from Zarasai and Daugavpils will meet in kick-off meeting in Centre of Culture of Zarasai Municipality and discuss the project implementation questions, main activities and tasks for the first project period. Shortly, here is what project participants can expect from this project and prepare to participate in (on Lithuanian side):
 Conference “How cultural organizations can create better economic and social conditions in deprived area” in homestead of Smalvos (Zarasai region), that will open the project “Create to remain” on 26-27 of June, 2018 and invite representatives from cultural organizations, government officials, start-up’s, artists and people to share the best practices regarding creative approaches to sell artwork and how cultural organizations can contribute in decreasing level of emigration and to create better economic and social conditions in the deprived area of Zarasai region;
 Courses and workshops in Centre of Culture of Zarasai Municipality from February, 2019 where deprived community’s members will be able to learn arts and crafts such as ceramics, wicker weaving, photography, DJ’ing and stage service craft (light and sound operators). Transportation for participants from Turmantas, Aviliai and Suviekas to these courses and workshops will be provided for free;
 Family festivals in Turmantas, Aviliai and Suviekas on May, 2019 to celebrate International Day of Families. Professional directors and hosts of the events will work with local communities and the most interesting legends and history facts about deprived territories will be revealed on the professional portable stage. During the festivals educational programs for families, entertainment programs for kids and discos for youth will be organized. Transportation for deprived communities will be organized so they can come to the events in other villages (for example Aviliai and Suviekas communities will come to Turmantas event by bus for free).
 Partners of the project believe that creativity can try to solve such problems as emigration, unemployment and social exclusion and to help people act, create, socialize, improve their living conditions, skills and become more satisfied with Zarasai and Daugavpils regions, “Create to remain” in the land where you belong.
 Main facts about the project:
 Name: Supporting creativity, activity & entrepreneurship of inhabitants from Daugavpils-Zarasai regions’ deprived territories, by using sociocultural measures (Create to remain) No. LLI-337
 Project duration: from 01.06.2018 to 30.11.2019 (18 months)
 The total budget of the project: € 227 187.00
 European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) financing € 193 108.95
 The content of this article is the sole responsibility of Centre of Culture of Zarasai Municipality and can under no circumstances be regarded as reflecting the position of the European Union.


type: wikipedia

text:
ACOG (angleško Advanced Combat Optical Gunsight) je vojaška kratica, ki označuje Izpopolnjen bojni optični namerilnik in je del modifikacijskega programa ameriških oboroženih sil SOPMOD. Proizvaja ga ameriško podjetje Trijicon in ga je razvilo brez vladne podpore kljub očitnemu namenu za vojaško rabo.
 ACOG je izboljšan strelni daljnogled s fiksno povečavo (odvisno od modela: 1,5 - 6×), ki omogoča lažje prepoznavanje in merjenje ciljev do 600 m. Odvisno od modela so uporabljene različne namerilne skale, pri večini pa skala prikazuje točko zadetka za več razdalj straljanja, zaradi česar daljnogleda ni treba ves čas nastreljevati.
 Za uporabo v pogojih slabe vidljivosti in ponoči ima ACOG izvedeno osvetljevanje bistvenega dela skale z radioaktivnim vodikovim izotopom tritijem in zato ne potrebujebaterijskega napajanja. Novejši modeli vsebujejo tudi optično vlakno, ki zajema svetlobo in skrbi za osvetlitev skale podnevi in pa izvedba z baterijskim napajanjem, ki ne vsebuje tritija. Ker ima tritij razpolovno dobo približno 12 let, se v tem času svetilnost zniža na polovico. Odvisno od modela je zato potrebna menjava kapsule s tritijem po 10-15 letih uporabe, ki jo mora opraviti proizvajalec.
 Izdelan je iz aluminija in je vodotesen do globine 11 metrov. Prvotno je bil namenjen namestitvi na jurišno puško M16 in karabinko M4, kasneje je bila z uporabo različnih nosilcev dodana možnost namestitve tudi na druga strelna orožja.
 Glej tudi
 Trijicon ACOG
 Optični namerilniki
 Program SOPMOD


type: caselaw

jurisdiction: EU

text:
 7.11.2009
 ET
 Euroopa Liidu Teataja
 C 267/65
 Esimese Astme Kohtu 9. septembri 2009. aasta määrus — Bart Nijs versus kontrollikoda
 (Kohtuasi T-375/08 P) (1)
 (Apellatsioonkaebus - Avalik teenistus - Ametnikud - Kontrollikoja otsus pikendada oma peasekretäri ametiaega - 2004. aasta hindamise käigus apellandi edutamata jätmine - Osaliselt ilmselgelt vastuvõetamatu ja osaliselt ilmselgelt põhjendamatu apellatsioonkaebus)
 2009/C 267/117
 Kohtumenetluse keel: prantsuse
 Pooled
 Apellatsioonkaebuse esitaja: Bart Nijs (Bereldange, Luxembourg) (esindajad: advokaadid F. Rollinger ja A. Hertzog)
 Teine menetluspool: Euroopa Ühenduste Kontrollikoda (esindajad: T. Kennedy, J.-M. Stenier ja G. Corstens)
 Ese
 Apellatsioonkaebus Avaliku Teenistuse Kohtu (teine koda) 26. juuni 2008. aasta määruse peale kohtuasjas F-1/08: Nijs vs. kontrollikoda (kohtulahendite kogumikus veel avaldamata) selle kohtumääruse tühistamiseks.
 Resolutsioon
 1.
 Jätta apellatsioonkaebus rahuldamata.
 2.
 Mõista käesoleva kohtuastme Euroopa Ühenduste Kontrollikoja kohtukulud välja Bart Nijsilt, kes ühtlasi kannab ise oma kohtukulud.
 (1) ELT C 301, 22.11.2008.


text:
Светослав I Игоревич (Свѧтославъ Игоревичь) е варяжки княз на Киевска Рус, наследник на княз Игор I (Ингвар). Баща му е убит от славяните малко след раждането му и до 963 г. страната се управлява от майка му, княгиня Елена – Олга Киевска. През краткото си управление Светослав води успешни войни с Хазарския хаганат и с Дунавска и Волжка България, като превръща Киевска Рус в най-голямата държава в Европа.
 Биография
 Сведенията за младостта на Светослав, която той прекарва в Новгород, са ограничени. Майка му, княгиня Елена – Олга, управлява като регент в Киев до неговото пълнолетие. Светослав остава известен с отказа си да приеме поддържаното от нея християнство. Въпреки това няма сведения за преследвания на християни, а започнатите от майка му църкви в Киев продължават да се строят.
 Светослав прекарва по-голямата част от управлението си начело на своята армия, воювайки срещу съседните държави. Най-големият му успех е разгромът на Хазария, която от векове е сред най-силните държави в Източна Европа. През 965 той побеждава и волжките българи, установявайки контрол над цялото средно и долно течение на Волга.
 През 968 Светослав се съюзява с Византийската империя и напада България. Той нанася тежко поражение на българските войски и достига до столицата Преслав.
 Българският цар Борис II прави опит да се споразумее със Светослав, което предизвиква недоволството на византийците. През 971 император Йоан I Цимисхи изпраща войски на север от Стара планина, прогонва Светослав на север от Дунав и пленява цар Борис II. Походът на Светослав на Балканите довежда до отслабване на българската държава и завладяването на източната й половина от византийците. Независимостта си от Византия запазват само Комитопулите в западните райони, незасегнати от руското нашествие.
 На връщане от България през 972 княз Светослав е нападнат и убит от печенегите, чийто хан прави от черепа му чаша.
 Светослав има три сина, Ярополк I, Олег и Владимир I, който е роден от Малуша.
 Външни препратки
 Chertkov A. D. „Opisanie voin velikago kniazya Svyatoslava Igorevicha“. Moscow, 1843.
 Sakharov, Andrey. „The Diplomacy of Svyatoslav“. Moscow: Nauka, 1982.
 Subtelny, Orest. „Ukraine: A History“. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1988. ISBN 0-8020-5808-6.
 Монарси на Киевска Рус
 Рюриковичи
 Убити монарси
 Родени в Киев


text:
Tarcza 4.0 – co oznaczają zapisy Ustawy z dnia 14 maja 2020 r. o zmianie niektórych ustaw w zakresie działań osłonowych w związku z rozprzestrzenianiem się wirusa SARS-CoV-2 dla uczelni? – Forum Dziekanatów
 Tarcza 4.0 – co oznaczają zapisy Ustawy z dnia 14 maja 2020 r. o zmianie niektórych ustaw w zakresie działań osłonowych w związku z rozprzestrzenianiem się wirusa SARS-CoV-2 dla uczelni?
 14 maja 2020 roku na naszym blogu Forum Dziekanatów pojawił się wpis Ewy Wiśniewskiej i Katarzyny Górak-Sosnowskiej pt. Zmiany dla dziekanatów: nowa Tarcza i rozporządzenie w sprawie studiów. We wprowadzeniu do tekstu czytamy: „(...) w zasadzie wszystko, o co wnioskowaliśmy do tej pory, czy pismami, czy na komisji (...) poza kpa zostało zrobione.” Tekst został napisany, co podkreślały autorki, w oparciu o skierowany do Senatu projekt Ustawy z dnia 30 kwietnia 2020 r. o zmianie niektórych ustaw w zakresie działań osłonowych w związku z rozprzestrzenianiem się wirusa SARS-CoV-2.
 W ostatnim czasie zmiany w naszym ustawodawstwie zachodzą jednak z taką częstotliwością i taką liczbą poprawek do ogłoszonych projektów ustaw i rozporządzeń, że w ostatecznym kształcie, powyższy projekt, w nieco zmienionej od pierwotnej wersji, stał się Ustawą z dnia 14 maja 2020 r. o zmianie niektórych ustaw w zakresie działań osłonowych w związku z rozprzestrzenianiem się wirusa SARS-CoV-2 (Dz.U. 2020 poz. 875) ogłoszoną 15 maja 2020 roku. Zgodnie z zapisami Art. 76. Ustawa weszła w życie z dniem następującym po dniu jej ogłoszenia, z licznymi wyjątkami wymienionymi w 10 następujących po sobie punktach.
 W stosunku do pierwotnie opublikowanej wersji projektu, zmiany w regulacjach, o których traktuje poprzedni wpis na blogu, polegają w głównej mierze na zmianie numeracji artykułów. Mamy zatem w Ustawie z dnia 14 maja 2020 r. o zmianie niektórych ustaw w zakresie działań osłonowych w związku z rozprzestrzenianiem się wirusa SARS-CoV-2:
 art. 35 wprowadza zmiany w zapisach Ustawy z dnia 3 lipca 2018 r. – Przepisy wprowadzające ustawę – Prawo o szkolnictwie wyższym i nauce (Dz. U. poz. 1669, z 2019 r. poz. 39 i 534 oraz z 2020 r. poz. 695) w art. 179 dotyczącym przewodów doktorskich, postępowań habilitacyjnych i postępowań o nadanie tytułu profesora;
 art. 37 – zmiany w Ustawie z dnia 20 lipca 2018 r. – Prawo o szkolnictwie wyższym i nauce (Dz. U. z 2020 r. poz. 85, 374 i 695) dotyczące wydawania dyplomów ukończenia studiów i suplementów;
 art. 47 pkt. 1 lit. a oraz lit. b – zmiany w ustawie z dnia 16 kwietnia 2020 r. o szczególnych instrumentach wsparcia w związku z rozprzestrzenianiem się wirusa SARS-CoV-2 (Dz. U. poz. 695) dotyczące możliwości zawieszenia kredytów studenckich;
 art. 47 pkt 1 lit. c zmiany w ustawie z dnia 16 kwietnia 2020 r. o szczególnych instrumentach wsparcia w związku z rozprzestrzenianiem się wirusa SARS-CoV-2 (Dz. U. poz. 695) dotyczące możliwości dokonania zmian w uchwale senatu w sprawie rekrutacji na studia wyższe;
 art. 47 pkt 1 lit. d zmiany w ustawie z dnia 16 kwietnia 2020 r. o szczególnych instrumentach wsparcia w związku z rozprzestrzenianiem się wirusa SARS-CoV-2 (Dz. U. poz. 695) dotyczące możliwości dokonania zmian w uchwale senatu w sprawie rekrutacji do szkoły doktorskiej.
 Dodatkowo, w ostatecznej wersji Ustawy z dnia 14 maja 2020 r. o zmianie niektórych ustaw w zakresie działań osłonowych w związku z rozprzestrzenianiem się wirusa SARS-CoV-2, pojawiły się zapisy, na które może nie tyle co czekaliśmy, ale o których wiedzieliśmy, że prędzej czy później muszą się pojawić, dotyczące przywrócenia biegu terminów. Zapisami Art. 15 zzs ust. 1 Ustawy z dnia 31 marca 2020 r. o zmianie ustawy o szczególnych rozwiązaniach związanych z zapobieganiem, przeciwdziałaniem i zwalczaniem COVID-19, innych chorób zakaźnych oraz wywołanych nimi sytuacji kryzysowych oraz niektórych innych ustaw (Dz.U. 2020 poz. 568):
 „W okresie stanu zagrożenia epidemicznego lub stanu epidemii ogłoszonego z powodu CO-VID bieg terminów procesowych i sądowych w (...) postępowaniach administracyjnych – nie rozpoczyna się, a rozpoczęty ulega zawieszeniu na ten okres.”
 Zgodnie z powyższym zapisem, w okresie stanu zagrożenia epidemicznego (od dnia 14 marca 2020 roku), który ogłoszony został §1 Rozporządzenia Ministra Zdrowia z dnia 13 marca 2020 r. w sprawie ogłoszenia na obszarze Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej stanu zagrożenia epidemicznego, bieg terminów procesowych w postępowaniach administracyjnych nie rozpoczął się, a rozpoczęty uległ zawieszeniu na ten okres. Więcej na ten temat można było przeczytać we wpisie Piotra Szumlińskiego z 1 kwietnia 2020 r. pt. Bieg terminów dla studentów w okresie obowiązywania stanu zagrożenia epidemicznego ogłoszonego z powodu COVID-19.
 Obecnie, zgodnie z zapisami Tarczy 4.0, art. 46 pkt. 20 w Ustawie z dnia 2 marca 2020 r. o szczególnych rozwiązaniach związanych z zapobieganiem, przeciwdziałaniem i zwalczaniem COVID-19, innych chorób zakaźnych oraz wywołanych nimi sytuacji kryzysowych (Dz. U. poz. 374, 567, 568 i 695) wprowadza się następujące zmiany: uchyla się art. 15zzr i art. 15zzs , natomiast zgodnie z art. 68 ust. 6 Ustawy z dnia 14 maja 2020 r. o zmianie niektórych ustaw w zakresie działań osłonowych w związku z rozprzestrzenianiem się wirusa SARS-CoV-2:
 Terminy w postępowaniach, o których mowa w art. 15zzs ustawy zmienianej w art. 46, których bieg nie rozpoczął się na podstawie art. 15zzs tej ustawy, rozpoczynają bieg po upływie 7 dni od dnia wejścia w życie niniejszej ustawy.
 oraz ust. 7 powyższego dokumentu:
 Terminy w postępowaniach, o których mowa w art. 15zzs ustawy zmienianej w art. 46, których bieg uległ zawieszeniu na podstawie art. 15zzs tej ustawy, biegną dalej po upływie 7 dni od dnia wejścia w życie niniejszej ustawy.
 Co to oznacza dla Uczelni? Rozpoczęliśmy właśnie wielkie odliczanie. Zapisy art. 46 i 68 ustawy weszły w życie z dniem 16 maja 2020 r. Dla wszystkich spraw studenckich prowadzonych na podstawie przepisów prawa administracyjnego (skreślenia z listy studentów, decyzje stypendialne), zarówno tych, których bieg nie rozpoczął się, jak i tych, których bieg uległ zawieszeniu, należy ustalić zakres dat dalszego procedowania wydawania decyzji administracyjnej. O ile bowiem proste pod względem matematycznym wydaje się ustalenie daty, od której sprawy rozpoczynają swój bieg lub biegną dalej (16 maja 2020 + 7 dni), o tyle niestety sprawa komplikuje się, gdyż przepisy zawieszające te postępowania zastały nas na różnym etapie spraw. Zdecydowanie trudniej przedstawia się zatem sprawa dla postępowań, dla których:
 wszczęto postępowanie w sprawie skreślenia – zawiadomienie nie zostało podjęte;
 wszczęto postępowanie w spawie skreślenia – student odebrał zawiadomienie przed ogłoszeniem stanu zawieszenia lub w trakcie jego trwania;
 wygenerowano decyzję o skreśleniu z listy studentów – te zostały skutecznie doręczone w różnych terminach (przed ogłoszeniem stanu zawieszenia oraz w trakcie jego trwania).
 Nad ustaleniem prawidłowego toku postępowania w tych przypadkach muszą pochylić się znawcy prawa administracyjnego. Myślę, że rozwikłanie powyższych kwestii to świetny materiał na kolejny wpis.
 Tarcza 4.0 – co oznaczają zapisy Ustawy z dnia 14 maja 2020 r. o zmianie niektórych ustaw w zakresie działań osłonowych w związku z rozprzestrzenianiem się wirusa SARS-CoV-2 dla uczelni? - 2020-05-19
 POL-on: co warto jeszcze poprawić? - 2020-04-10
 decyzje, mnisw, skreślenia, tarcza
 « Zmiany dla dziekanatów: Nowa Tarcza i rozporządzenie w sprawie studiów
 Rozwiązania dotyczące potwierdzenia odbioru legitymacji przez studentów »


type: legislation

text:
 Důležité právní upozornění
 |
 52004SC1320
 V Bruselu dne 28.10.2004SEK(2004)1320 v konečném znění..PředlohaROZHODNUTÍ SMÍŠENÉHO VÝBORU EHPkterým se mění příloha XIII (Doprava) Dohody o EHP.- Předloha společného postoje Společenství -(předložená Komisí)DŮVODOVÁ ZPRÁVA1. Pro zajištění nezbytné právní jistoty a jednotnosti má Smíšený výbor EHP začlenit veškeré příslušné právní předpisy Společenství do Dohody o EHP co nejdříve po jejich přijetí.2. Smíšený výbor EHP by měl proto změnit přílohu XIII (Doprava) Dohody o EHP přijetím přiložené předlohy rozhodnutí, která se týká:32002 R 1592 : Nařízení Evropského parlamentu a Rady (ES) č. 1592/2002 ze dne 15. července 2002 o společných pravidlech v oblasti civilního letectví a o zřízení Evropské agentury pro bezpečnost letectví (Úř. věst. L 240, 7.9.2002, s. 1).3. Předloha rozhodnutí Smíšeného výboru EHP stanoví rámec pro účast států ESVO EHP v Evropské agentuře pro bezpečnost letectví, zejména včetně opatření týkajících se finančního příspěvku států ESVO EHP, jakož i postupů pro jejich účast ve výboru zřízeném nařízením, tj. plnou účast s výjimkou hlasovacího práva.4. Čl. 1 odst. 3 písm. a) nařízení Rady (ES) č. 2894/94 o některých prováděcích pravidlech k Dohodě o EHP stanoví, aby Rada zaujala postoj Společenství u rozhodnutí, jimiž se s podstatnými změnami rozšiřuje právní akt Společenství.5. Předloha rozhodnutí Smíšeného výboru EHP se předkládá Radě ke schválení, po němž při nejbližší příležitosti Komise předloží postoj Společenství ve Smíšeném výboru EHP.PředlohaROZHODNUTÍ SMÍŠENÉHO VÝBORU EHPkterým se mění příloha XIII (Doprava) Dohody o EHPSMÍŠENÝ VÝBOR EHP,s ohledem na Dohodu o Evropském hospodářském prostoru ve znění Protokolu o úpravě Dohody o Evropském hospodářském prostoru (dále jen „Dohoda“), a zejména s ohledem na článek 98 této dohody,vzhledem k těmto důvodům:(1) Příloha XIII Dohody byla změněna rozhodnutím Smíšeného výboru EHP č. ... / ... ze dne ...[1].(2) Nařízení Evropského parlamentu a Rady (ES) č. 1592/2002 ze dne 15. července 2002 o společných pravidlech v oblasti civilního letectví a o zřízení Evropské agentury pro bezpečnost letectví[2] má za hlavní cíl zřízení a zachování vysoké jednotné úrovně bezpečnosti civilního letectví v rámci Společenství.(3) Činnosti Evropské agentury pro bezpečnost letectví může ovlivnit úroveň bezpečnosti civilního letectví v rámci Evropského hospodářského prostoru.(4) Nařízení (ES) č. 1592/2002 by proto mělo být začleněno do Dohody, aby byla umožněna plná účast států ESVO v Evropské agentuře pro bezpečnost letectví,ROZHODLA TAKTO:Článek 1Příloha XIII Dohody se mění podle přílohy tohoto rozhodnutí.Článek 2Znění nařízení (ES) č. 1592/2002 v islandském a norském jazyce, která mají být zveřejněna v dodatku EHP Úředního věstníku Evropské unie , jsou platná.Článek 3Toto rozhodnutí vstupuje v platnost dnem [...] za předpokladu, že Smíšenému výboru EHP jsou učiněna veškerá oznámení podle čl. 103 odst. 1 Dohody*.Článek 4Toto rozhodnutí bude zveřejněno v oddíle EHP a v dodatku EHP Úředního věstníku Evropské unie.V Bruselu dneZa Smíšený výbor EHPpředseda tajemníci Smíšeného výboru EHPPŘÍLOHArozhodnutí č. [...] Smíšeného výboru EHPZa bod 66m (nařízení Komise (ES) č. 1138/2004) v příloze XIII Dohody se vkládá nový bod, který zní:„66n. 32002 R 1592: Nařízení Evropského parlamentu a Rady (ES) č. 1592/2002 ze dne 15. července 2002 o společných pravidlech v oblasti civilního letectví a o zřízení Evropské agentury pro bezpečnost letectví (Úř. věst. L 240, 7.9.2002, s. 1).Pro účely Dohody se nařízení upravuje takto:a) Nestanoví-li se níže jinak a bez ohledu na ustanovení protokolu 1 Dohody, rozumí se, že výrazy „členský stát“ nebo „členské státy“ uváděné v nařízení zahrnují kromě států uvedených v nařízení také státy ESVO. Uplatňuje se odstavec 11 protokolu 1.b) Pokud jde o státy ESVO, je-li to vhodné, je agentura případně nápomocna Kontrolnímu úřadu ESVO nebo Stálému výboru při výkonu jejich úkolů.c) Toto nařízení nelze vykládat tak, že pověřuje Evropskou agenturu pro bezpečnost letectví (EASA), aby jednala jménem států ESVO v rámci mezinárodních dohod pro jiné účely než podporu při plnění jejich povinností podle těchto dohod.d) Článek 9 se mění takto:(i) V odstavci 1 se za slova „Společenství“ vkládají slova „nebo státem ESVO“.(ii) V článku 9 se odstavec 2 nahrazuje tímto:„Když Komise vyjednává se třetí zemí za účelem uzavření dohody, jež stanoví, že členský stát nebo agentura může vydávat osvědčení na základě osvědčení vydaných leteckými orgány třetí země, usiluje vždy o dosažení podobných dohod s danou třetí zemí pro státy ESVO. Státy ESVO se budou snažit uzavírat s třetími zeměmi dohody, které odpovídají dohodám Společenství s těmito zeměmi.“e) V článku 11 se doplňuje nový odstavec, který zní:„5. Nařízení Evropského parlamentu a Rady (ES) č. 1049/2001 ze dne 30. května 2001 o přístupu veřejnosti k dokumentům Evropského parlamentu, Rady a Komise se pro účely uplatňování nařízení vztahuje rovněž na veškeré dokumenty agentury týkající se států ESVO.“f) V čl. 12 odst. 2 písm. b) se doplňuje nový text, který zní:„Agentura je rovněž nápomocna Kontrolnímu úřadu ESVO a nabízí mu stejnou podporu, pokud taková opatření a úkoly spadají podle Dohody do působnosti úřadu.“g) V čl. 12. odst. 2 se písmeno e) nahrazuje tímto:„v oblasti působnosti vykonává funkce a úkoly vyplývající pro smluvní strany z použitelných mezinárodních smluv, zejména Chicagské úmluvy. Vnitrostátní letecké orgány států ESVO vykonávají pouze takové funkce a úkoly, které jsou uvedeny v tomto nařízení.“h) V článku 15 se první věta nahrazuje tímto:„S ohledem na výrobky, součásti a zařízení podle čl. 4 odst. 1, pokud je to vhodné a podle specifikace v Chicagské úmluvě nebo v jejích přílohách, vykonává agentura funkce a úkoly státu týkající se konstrukce, výroby nebo registrace, vztahují-li se na schválení konstrukce. Vnitrostátní letecké orgány států ESVO vykonávají pouze takové funkce a úkoly, které jsou jim podle tohoto článku přiděleny.“i) Článek 16 se mění takto:V odstavci 1 se doplňuje nová věta, která zní:„Agentura podává Kontrolnímu úřadu ESVO zprávu o normalizačních inspekcích ve státě ESVO.“V odstavci 3 se doplňuje nová věta, která zní:„Pokud jde o státy ESVO, je agentura konzultována Kontrolním úřadem ESVO.“j) V článku 20 se doplňuje nový odstavec, který zní:„4. Odchylně od čl. 12 odst. 2 písm. a) pracovního řádu ostatních zaměstnanců Evropských společenství může výkonný ředitel agentury zaměstnávat na základě smluv příslušníky států ESVO, kteří v plném rozsahu požívají občanská práva.“k) V článku 21 se doplňuje nová věta, která zní:„Státy ESVO použijí na agenturu a její pracovníky protokol o výsadách a imunitách Evropských společenství a použitelná pravidla přijatá v souladu s protokolem.“l) V čl. 23 odst. 1 se po slově „Společenství“ vkládají slova„, islandském a norském jazyce“m) V čl. 24 odst. 2 se za písmeno c) doplňuje nové písmeno, které zní:„ca) Celková zpráva a plán práce agentury podle článků b) a c) se předloží Kontrolnímu úřadu ESVO.“n) V článku 25 se doplňuje nový odstavec, který zní:„3. Státy ESVO se plně podílejí na činnosti správní rady a v rámci rady mají stejná práva a povinnosti jako členské státy EU, s výjimkou hlasovacího práva.“o) V článku 32 se doplňuje nový odstavec, který zní:„6. Příslušníci států ESVO mohou být ustanoveni členy a rovněž předsedy/předsedkyněmi odvolacích senátů. Při přípravě seznamu osob uvedeného v odstavci 3 zváží Komise vhodné osoby rovněž z řad příslušníků států ESVO.“p) V článku 45 se na konci odstavce 1 doplňují slova:„Pokud jde o státy ESVO, je agentura nápomocna Kontrolnímu úřadu ESVO při výkonu výše uvedených úkolů.“q) V článku 48 se doplňuje nový odstavec, který zní:„8. Státy ESVO se podílejí na finančním příspěvku od Společenství uvedeném v první odrážce odstavce 1. Pro tento účel se použijí obdobně postupy uvedené v čl. 82 odst. 1 písm. a) a protokolu 32 Dohody.“r) V článku 54 se doplňují nové odstavce, které znějí:„6. Státy ESVO se plně podílejí na činnosti výboru zřízeného podle odstavce 1 a v rámci tohoto výboru mají stejná práva a povinnosti jako členské státy ES, s výjimkou hlasovacího práva.7. V případě absence dohody mezi Společenstvím a výborem může o dané záležitosti rozhodnout Rada a státy ESVO pak mohou tuto záležitost projednat ve Smíšeném výboru EHP v souladu s článkem 5 Dohody.““[1] Úř. věst. L [...], [...], s. [...].[2] Úř. věst. L 240, 7.9.2002, s. 1.* [Nebyly oznámeny žádné ústavní požadavky.] [Byly oznámeny ústavní požadavky.]


text:
 Fógra dlíthiúil tábhachtach
 |
 52007PC0159
 Togra le haghaidh rialacháin ó Pharlaimint na Heorpa agus ón gComhairle lena leasaítear Rialachán (CEE) Uimh. 1408/71 ón gComhairle maidir le scéimeanna slándála sóisialta a chur i bhfeidhm ar dhaoine fostaithe, ar dhaoine féinfhostaithe agus ar bhaill dá dteaghlaigh ag gluaiseacht sa Chomhphobal (arna thíolacadh ag an gCoimisiún) /* COIM/2007/0159 leagan deireanach - COD 2007/0054 */
 [pic] | COIMISIÚN NA gCOMHPHOBAL EORPACH |An Bhruiséil 30.3.2007COIM(2007) 159 leagan deireanach2007/0054 (COD)Togra le haghaidhRIALACHÁIN Ó PHARLAIMINT NA hEORPA AGUS ÓN gCOMHAIRLElena leasaítear Rialachán (CEE) Uimh. 1408/71 ón gComhairle maidir le scéimeanna slándála sóisialta a chur i bhfeidhm ar dhaoine fostaithe, ar dhaoine féinfhostaithe agus ar bhaill dá dteaghlaigh ag gluaiseacht sa Chomhphobal(arna thíolacadh ag an gCoimisiún)MEABHRÁN MÍNIÚCHÁINCOMHTHÉACS AN TOGRA |110 | Forais agus cuspóirí an togra Tá sé beartaithe go ndéanfaidh an togra seo Rialachán (CEE) Uimh. 1408/71 ón gComhphobal a thabhairt suas chun dáta ionas go léireoidh sé athruithe i reachtaíocht na mBallstát maidir le slándáil shóisialta. |120 | Comhthéacs ginearálta Tá an togra seo ar cheann de na nuashonruithe rialta a dhéantar ar Rialachán (CEE) Uimh. 1408/71, nó chun bheith níos cruinne ar a chuid iarscríbhinní. Tá sé mar aidhm aige léargas ceart a thabhairt ar athruithe ar an staid bhreithiúnach ag an leibhéal náisiúnta agus dá bhrí sin chun comhordú leordhóthanach a áirithiú ag leibhéal an Chomhphobail idir na córais náisiúnta slándála sóisialta. Rinne Rialachán (CE) Uimh. 883/2004 simpliú agus nuachóiriú ar Rialachán (CEE) Uimh. 1408/71, agus beidh sé infheidhme i gcás ina mbeidh a rialachán feidhmiúcháin tagtha i bhfeidhm. Meastar gurb é seo an nuashonrú rialta deiridh ar Rialachán (CEE) Uimh. 1408/71 sula gcuirtear an dá Rialachán nua chun feidhme. |130 | Forálacha atá ann cheana i réimse an togra Rialachán (CEE) Uimh. 1408/71, arna nuashonrú le Rialachán (CE) Uimh. 118/97 agus arna leasú go deireanach le Rialachán (CE) Uimh. 629/2006 ó Pharlaimint na hEorpa agus ón gComhairle. Déanfaidh an togra láithreach tagairtí atá luaite in iarscríbhinní áirithe den Rialachán a thabhairt suas chun dáta agus a leasú, ar tagairtí iad a bhaineann le reachtaíochtaí náisiúnta a leasaíodh. |141 | Comhsheasmhacht le beartais agus cuspóirí eile an Aontais Neamh-infheidhme. |COMHAIRLIÚCHAN LE PÁIRTITHE LEASMHARA AGUS MEASÚNÚ IARMHARTA |Comhairliúchán le páirtithe leasmhara |211 | Modhanna comhairliúcháin, na príomhearnálacha ar díríodh orthu agus cuntas gairid ginearálta ar na freagróirí Tugadh cuireadh do na Ballstáit iarratais ar leasuithe a dhéanamh chun Rialacháin (CEE) Uimh 1408/71 agus 574/72 a thabhairt suas chun dáta ionas go léireofar athruithe ina reachtaíocht náisiúnta. Tá breithniú déanta ag oifigigh an Choimisiúin ar na héilimh seo, rinne siad scrúdú orthu in éineacht le hionadaithe na mBallstát le linn cruinniú den Choimisiún Riarthach um Shlándáil Shóisialta d'Oibrithe Imirceacha, agus, i gcás inar cuí sin, fuair siad soiléiriú maidir le sonraí áirithe ó ionadaithe na mBallstát lena mbaineann. |212 | Achoimre ar na freagraí agus conas ar cuireadh san áireamh iad Glacadh leis na hiarratais a mheastar a bheith ar comhréir le dlí AE agus a bhí ceadaithe ag an gcoimisiún riarthach |Bailiú agus úsáid saineolais |221 | Na fearainn eolaíochta/saineolais atá i gceist Comhordú na slándála sóisialta |222 | An Mhodheolaiocht a úsáideadh Pléití i gcruinnithe den Choimisiún Riarthach um Shlándáil Shóisialta d'Oibrithe Imirceacha, agus más gá, tuilleadh pléití chun soiléiriú a fháil, go háirithe maidir le sonraí reachtaíochta náisiúnta, le hionadaithe ar an gCoimisiún Riarthach ó na Ballstáit lena mbaineann. |223 | Na príomheagraíochtaí/saineolaithe a ndeachthas i gcomhairle leo An Coimisiún Riarthach um Shlándáil Shóisialta d'Oibrithe Imirceacha mar aon le roinnt de na hionadaithe ar an gCoimisiún seo. |2249 | Achoimre ar an gcomhairle a fuarthas agus a úsáideadh Níor luadh go bhfuil rioscaí tromchúiseacha ann nach bhfuil aon teacht aniar óna n-iarmhairtí. |Comhaontaíodh iontrálacha áirithe a bhaineann leis na Ballstáit a thabhairt suas chun dáta sna hIarscríbhinní a ghabhann le Rialachán (CEE) Uimh. 1408/71. |226 | Modhanna a úsáideadh chun an chomhairle shaineolach a chur ar fáil don phobal Modhanna ar bith |230 | Anailís Iarmharta Is minic a dhéanann Ballstáit leasuithe ar a gcuid reachtaíochta slándála sóisialta. Dá bhrí sin, tagann tagairtí do reachtaíocht náisiúnta i reachtaíocht AE ina gcomhordaítear scéimeanna slándála sóisialta chun bheith as dáta agus ina gcúis le héiginnteacht dhlíthiúil. Is chun dochair do shaoránaigh an AE a bhíonn ag gluaiseacht laistigh den AE an staid seo toisc nach mbíonn a gcearta curtha in iúl dóibh go cuí. Bíonn sé níos deacra do na hinstitiúidí náisiúnta slándála sóisialta forálacha AE lena gcomhordaítear slándáil shóisialta a fheidhmiú go cuí. Ní mór na tagairtí i reachtaíocht chomhordaitheach AE, go háirithe i Rialacháin (CEE) Uimh. 1408/71 agus 574/72 a thabhairt suas chun dáta chun go léireofaí reachtaíocht náisiúnta i gceart. Ní féidir rialacháin AE a thabhairt suas chun dáta ach amháin le Rialachán eile. Is chun leasa do na saoránaigh lena mbaineann é go ndéanfar Rialacháin Chomhphobail a thabhairt suas chun dáta go luath i ndiaidh reachtaíocht náisiúnta a leasú fiú má tháinig Rialachán (CE) Uimh. 883/2004 a ghlacann áit Rialachán (CEE) Uimh. 1408/71 i bhfeidhm an 20 Bealtaine 2004: ní bheidh feidhm ag an Rialachán seo go dtí go mbeidh an togra le haghaidh an Rialacháin cur chun feidhme atá faoi chaibidil i láthair na huaire glactha. I dtéarmaí ualaigh oibre nó costas, ní dhéanfaidh an Rialachán cur chun feidhme atá molta aon difear do staid reatha institiúidí agus riarachán slándála sóisialta, d'oibrithe nó d'fhostóirí. Dá ainneoin, is é is cuspóir don uasdátú seo ná comhordú scéimeanna slándála sóisialta a fheabhsú, agus cosaint níos fearr a thabhairt do shaoránaigh AE agus iad ag gluaiseacht laistigh den AE. |GNÉITHE DLÍTHIÚLA AN TOGRA |305 | Achoimre ar an ngníomh atá molta Tá sé beartaithe go ndéanfaidh an togra seo roinnt de na hiarscríbhinní a ghabhann le Rialachán (CEE) Uimh. 1408/71 a thabhairt suas chun dáta ionas go léireofaí athruithe i reachtaíocht slándála sóisialta na mBallstát. Déanfaidh sé cur chun feidhme na reachtaíochta Comhphobail lena gcomhordaítear scéimeanna slándála sóisialta a éascú trína áirithiú go léiríonn sé an reachtaíocht náisiúnta atá i bhfeidhm i gceart. |310 | Bunús dlí Airteagail 42 agus 308 de Chonradh CE. |320 | Prionsabal na coimhdeachta, Bíonn feidhm ag prionsabal na coimhdeachta a mhéid is nach mbaineann an togra le réimse atá folaithe ag inniúlacht eisiach an Chomhphobail. |Ní fhéadtar cuspóirí an togra a bhaint amach i gceart trí ghníomh ag na Ballstáit de bharr na gcúiseanna seo a leanas: |321 | Éilíonn Airteagal 42 den Chonradh gníomh Comhphobail i bhfoirm bearta comhordaitheacha i réimse na slándála sóisialta agus tá gá leis chun a áirithiú gur féidir an ceart is saorghluaiseacht oibrithe atá leagtha síos sa Chonradh a fheidhmiú go hiomlán. Gan comhordú den sórt sin, bheadh baol ann nach bhféadfaí an tsaorghluaiseacht a oibriú, toisc nach dóigh go n-úsáidfeadh daoine an ceart seo chomh mór céanna dá bhfágfadh sé, i ndáiríre, go gcaillfidís cearta slándála sóisialta a fuair siad cheana féin i mBallstát eile. Níl mar aidhm ag reachtaíocht reatha an Chomhphobail maidir le slándáil shóisialta ionad na scéimeanna náisiúnta éagsúla a ghabháil. Ba chóir béim a chur air nach beart comhchuibhithe an togra seo agus nach dtéann sé thar mar is gá le haghaidh comhordaithe éifeachtaigh. Go bunúsach, tá mar aidhm ag an togra na rialacha comhordaitheacha atá ann cheana a thabhairt suas chun dáta chun na hathruithe ar an reachtaíocht náisiúnta a léiriú. Cé go bhfuil an togra bunaithe ar rannchuidiú ó na Ballstáit, ní fhéadfadh Ballstáit na forálacha sin a ghlacadh ar leibhéal náisiúnta ós rud é go bhféadfadh sin a bheith ar neamhréir leis an Rialachán seo. Dá bhrí sin, tá sé riachtanach a áirithiú go ndéanfar na hiarscríbhinní a ghabhann leis an Rialachán a oiriúnú go cuí chun go bhféadfaí an Rialachán a chur i bhfeidhm go héifeachtach sna Ballstáit lena mbaineann. Baineann comhordú na slándála sóisialta le staideanna trasteorann i gcás nach féidir le haon Bhallstát gníomhú leis féin. Gabhann an Rialachán comhordaitheach ón gComhphobal ionad na gcomhaontuithe líonmhara déthaobhacha atá ann cheana. Ní hamháin go ndéanann sé seo simpliú ar chomhordú na slándála sóisialta do na Ballstáit ach áirithíonn sé cóir chomhionann do dhaoine atá árachaithe de réir reachtaíochta náisiúnta slándála sóisialta. |Is féidir cuspóirí an togra a bhaint amach níos fearr trí ghníomh ag leibhéal an Chomhphobail ar na cúiseanna seo a leanas. |324 | Níl ciall le comhordú scéimeanna slándála sóisialta ach amháin ag leibhéal an Chomhphobail. Is í an aidhm atá ann ná oibriú chomhordú na scéimeanna slándála sóisialta sna Ballstáit go léir a áirithiú. Tá sé seo bunaithe ar shaorghluaiseacht daoine laistigh den AE agus is í an tsaorghluaiseacht a fhágann go bhfuil call leis. |325 | Níl aon táscairí cáilíochtúla ann, ach baineann an Rialachán seo le gach saoránach de chuid an AE a ghluaiseann, ar chúis ar bith, laistigh den AE. |27 | Níl sa togra seo ach beart comhordaitheach nach féidir a thógáil ach ag leibhéal an Chomhphobail. Fós féin, is faoi na Ballstáit a bheidh sé a gcuid scéimeanna slándála sóisialta féin a eagrú agus a mhaoiniú. |Dá bhrí sin, comhlíonann an togra prionsabal na coimhdeachta. |Prionsabal na comhréireachta Comhlíonann an togra prionsabal na comhréireachta ar na cúiseanna seo a leanas. |331 | Éilíonn Rialachán (CEE) Uimh. 1408/71 an cineál seo gnímh toisc nach féidir ach le Rialachán eile Rialachán a leasú. Fós féin, is faoi na Ballstáit a bheidh sé a gcuid scéimeanna slándála sóisialta féin a eagrú agus a mhaoiniú. |332 | Déanann an togra seo comhordú scéimeanna slándála sóisialta a éascú do na Ballstáit agus dá bhrí sin is chun leasa do shaoránaigh é mar aon leis na húdaráis náisiúnta slándala sóisialta. Tá na forálacha speisialta seo bunaithe ar thograí ó na Ballstáit, rud a fhágann go bhfuil aon ualach airgeadais agus riaracháin ionchasach íoslaghdaithe agus i gcomhréir leis an gcuspóir thuasluaite. Ar an dtaobh eile, mura ndéanfaí Rialachán (CEE) Uimh. 1408/71 a uasdátú amhlaidh, is dóigh go mbeadh na hualaigh airgeadais agus riaracháin níos mó. |Rogha ionstraimí |341 | An ionstraim/ na hionstraimí atá molta: Rialachán |342 | Ní bheadh ionstraimí eile iomchuí ar na cúiseanna seo a leanas. Níl aon rogha eile ann mar ní féidir ach le Rialachán eile téacs cosúil le Rialachán (CEE) Uimh. 1408/71 a leasú. |IMPLEACHTAÍ BUISÉADACHA |409 | Níl aon impleachtaí ag an togra do bhuiséad an Chomhphobail. |FAISNÉIS BHREISE |520 | Aisghairm reachtaíochta atá ann cheana Fágfaidh glacadh an togra seo go gcaithfear forálacha reachtacha áirithe a aisghairm. |560 | An Limistéar Eorpach Eacnamaíoch Baineann an dréachtionstraim seo le ní a thagann faoi réim Chomhaontú LEE agus ba chóir dá bhrí sin go ndéanfaí é a leathnú go dtí an Limistéar Eorpach Eacnamaíoch. |570 | Míniú mionsonraithe ar an togra, de réir caibidle nó airteagail I. Leasuithe ar iarscríbhinn I 1. Leasú ar chuid I Tugtar sainmhíniú ar na téarmaí "daoine fostaithe" agus "daoine féinfhostaithe" i gCuid I d'Iarscríbhinn I i gcásanna nach féidir iad a chinneadh ón reachtaíocht náisiúnta. Ba chóir an friotal faoin gceannteideal "I. Éire" a leasú ionas go ndéanfaidh an tagairt na hathruithe ar théacsanna tagartha na hÉireann de bharr chomhdhlúthú reachtaíocht shóisialta na hÉireann, mar atá faoi láthair san Acht Comhdhlúite Leasa Shóisialaigh 2005 a chur i gcuntas . 2. Leasú ar Chuid II Tugtar sainmhíniú ar an téarma "baill teaghlaigh" i gCuid II d'Iarscríbhinn I, i gcás nach gcumasaíonn an reachtaíocht náisiúnta idirdhealú a dhéanamh idir baill teaghlaigh agus daoine eile. Ba chóir an friotal faoin gceannteideal 'I. Éire" a leasú ionas go ndéanfaidh an tagairt an dlí Éireannach nua lena mbunaítear Feidhmeannacht na Seirbhíse Sláinte a ghlacann ionad na mBord/ na nÚdarás Sláinte a bhíodh ann a chur i gcuntas. II Iarscríbhinn II 1. Leasú ar Chuid I Tugann Cuid II d'Iarscríbhinn II sainmhíniú ar na scéimeanna speisialta do dhaoine féinfhostaithe arna n-eisiamh ó raon feidhme an Rialacháin seo de bhun an ceathrú fomhír d'Airteagal I(j). Ba chóir an friotal faoin gceannteideal "H. An Fhrainc" a shimpliú chun a chur i gcuntas nach ndearnadh an t-árachas forlíontach dá dtagraítear i mír 2 a chur i bhfeidhm. Is ionann laghdú iarscríbhinne chun scéimeanna áirithe a eisiamh ó raon feidhme an Rialacháin agus an Rialachán a shimpliú. 2. Leasú ar Chuid II Tugann Cuid II d'Iarscríbhinn II sainmhíniú ar na liúntais speisialta luí seoil nó uchtála arna n-eisiamh ó raon feidhme an Rialacháin de bhun Airteagal 1(u)(i). Ba chóir an friotal faoin gceannteideal "S. An Pholainn" a leasú ionas nach mbeidh an sochar atá luaite faoi láthair (forlíonadh ar liúntas luí seoil) arna eisiamh a thuilleadh ach go mbeidh sé faoi réir a chomhordaithe freisin. Is féidir an tagairt nua a éiríonn as glacadh ionstraim an 29 Nollaig 2005 a chur isteach de bhun Airteagal 1(u)(i). III. Leasú ar Iarscríbhinn IIa Déanann Iarscríbhinn IIa liosta de na sochair speisialta neamhranníocacha a dheonaítear do na daoine lena mbaineann go heisiach i gcríoch an Bhallstáit ina bhfuil cónaí orthu faoi Airteagal 10a de Rialachán (CEE) Uimh. 1408/71. Ba chóir an friotal faoin gceannteideal "I. Éire" a leasú ionas go ndéanfaidh an tagairt na hathruithe ar théacsanna tagartha na hÉireann de bharr chomhdhlúthú reachtaíocht shóisialta na hÉireann, mar atá faoi láthair san Acht Comhdhlúite Leasa Shóisialaigh 2005, a chur i gcuntas. Níl aon leasuithe substainteacha ann. IV. Leasú ar Chuid A d'Iarscríbhinn III Tá liosta in Iarscríbhinn III de na forálacha de chuid comhaontuithe déthaobhacha láithreacha roimh chur i bhfeidhm an Rialacháin sna Ballstáit lena mbaineann. Tá liosta i gCuid A de na forálacha de chuid comhaontuithe déthaobhacha a leanfaidh d'fheidhm a bheith acu, cé go bhfuil Rialachán (CEE) Uimh. 1408/71 tar éis ionad fhorálacha na gcomhaontuithe déthaobhacha a ghabháil i gcoitinne. Ba chóir go gcuirfí i gcuntas sa fhriotal faoi "An Ungáir-An Ostair" go bhfuil an fhoráil sa dá chomhaontú déthaobhach maidir le pinsin a ríomh as feidhm mar gheall ar leasú ar dhlí pinsean na hUngáire más rud é gur giorra an tréimhse árachais san Ungáir ná an mheánré atá leagtha síos sa scéim Ungáireach maidir le pinsin a ríomh. V. Leasuithe ar Iarscríbhinn IV 1. Leasú ar Iarscríbhinn IV, Cuid A Tá liosta in Iarscríbhinn IV, Cuid A de na reachtaíochtaí dá dtagraítear in Airteagal 37(1) den Rialachán ar dá réir a bheidh méid na sochar easláine neamhspleách ar fhad na dtréimhsí árachais. Ba chóir an friotal faoin gceannteideal "I. Éire" a leasú ionas go ndéanfaidh an tagairt na hathruithe ar théacsanna tagartha na hÉireann de bharr chomhdhlúthú reachtaíocht shóisialta na hÉireann, mar atá faoi láthair san Acht Comhdhlúite Leasa Shóisialaigh 2005, a chur i gcuntas . Ba chóir an friotal faoin gceannteideal "Q. An Ísiltír" a leasú ionas go gcuirfear i gcuntas gur glacadh Acht an 10 Samhain 2005 "Wet werk en inkomen naar arbeidsvermogen (WIA)". 2. Leasú ar Iarscríbhinn IV, Cuid C Tá liosta in Iarscríbhinn IV, Cuid C de na "cásanna dá dtagraítear in Airteagal 46(1)(b) den Rialachán ina bhféadfaí ríomhaireacht sochar de réir Airteagal 46(2) den Rialachán a tharscaoileadh" toisc nach dtiocfaidh toradh níos airde riamh as. Ba chóir an friotal faoin gceannteideal "O. An Ungáir" a scriosadh, toisc gur thug na ríomhaireachtaí a bhí bunaithe ar an reachtaíocht leasaithe le fios go bhféadfadh an ríomhaireacht pro rata a bheith níos airde ná ríomhaireacht an phinsin náisiúnta. Toisc nach bhfuil na coinníollacha chun an ríomhaireacht chomparáideach arna sásamh a thuilleadh, ba chóir ionchur ar an liosta seo a tharraingt siar. Ba chóir an friotal faoin gceannteideal "R. An Ostair" a leasú d'fhonn cásanna nuair nach gá ríomhaireacht chomparáideach a dhéanamh ar an sochar a chur i gcuntas. VI. Leasuithe ar Iarscríbhinn VI Leagann Iarscríbhinn VI amach nósanna imeachta speisialta chun reachtaíocht Ballstát áirithe eile a chur chun feidhme. Ba chóir an fhaisnéis faoin gceannteideal "C. An Danmhairg" a leasú faoi phointí 6 agus 11 d'fhonn leasú nach bhfuil ann ach leasú foirmiúil ar dhlí náisiúnta na Danmhairge a chur i gcuntas. Ba chóir an friotal faoin gceannteideal "Q. An Ísiltír" a leasú i bpointe 4 ionas go gcuirfear i gcuntas gur glacadh Acht an 10 Samhain 2005 "Wet werk en inkomen naar arbeidsvermogen (WIA)". Ba chóir an friotal faoin gceannteideal "R. An Ostair" a chríochnú i bpointe 10 ionas go sonrófar conas a chuirfear tréimhsí thar lear i gcuntas le linn pinsean a ríomh. VII. Leasú ar Iarscríbhinn VIII Déanann Iarscríbhinn VIII liosta de na scéimeanna nach dtugtar ach sochair theaghlaigh nó sochair fhorlíontacha nó speisialta do dhílleachtaí fúthu. Ba chóir an friotal faoin gceannteideal 'I. Éire" a leasú ionas go ndéanfaidh an tagairt an dlí Éireannach nua lena mbunaítear Feidhmeannacht na Seirbhíse Sláinte a ghlacann ionad na mBord/ na nÚdarás Sláinte a bhíodh ann, a chur i gcuntas. |F-6827 |1. 2007/0054 (COD)Togra le haghaidhRIALACHÁIN Ó PHARLAIMINT NA hEORPA AGUS ÓN gCOMHAIRLElena leasaítear Rialachán (CEE) Uimh. 1408/71 ón gComhairle maidir le scéimeanna slándála sóisialta a chur i bhfeidhm ar dhaoine fostaithe, ar dhaoine féinfhostaithe agus ar bhaill dá dteaghlaigh ag gluaiseacht sa Chomhphobal(Téacs atá ábhartha maidir leis an LEE)TÁ PARLAIMINT NA hEORPA AGUS COMHAIRLE AN AONTAIS EORPAIGH,ag féachaint don Chonradh ag bunú an Chomhphobail Eorpaigh, agus go háirithe Airteagail 42 agus 308,Ag féachaint don togra ón gCoimisiún[1],Ag féachaint don tuairim ó Choiste Eacnamaíoch agus Sóisialta na hEorpa[2] ,Ag féachaint don tuairim ó Choiste na Réigiún[3],Ag gníomhú dóibh i gcomhréir leis an nós imeachta a leagtar síos in Airteagal 251 den Chonradh[4],De bharr an méid seo a leanas:(1) D'fhonn athruithe ar reachtaíocht Ballstát áirithe a chur i gcuntas, ní mór iarscríbhinní áirithe a ghabhann le Rialachán (CEE) Uimh. 1408/71[5] a oiriúnú.(2) Dá bhrí sin, ba chóir Rialachán (CEE) Uimh. 1408/71 a leasú dá réir sin.(3) Ní fhorálann an Conradh do chumhachtaí seachas na cumhachtaí faoi Airteagal 308 chun bearta iomchuí a ghlacadh i réimse na slándála sóisialta do dhaoine seachas daoine fostaithe,TAR ÉIS AN RIALACHÁN SEO A GHLACADH:Airteagal 1Déanfar Iarscríbhinní I, II, IIa, III, IV, VI, agus VIII a ghabhann le Rialachán (CEE) Uimh. 1408/71 a leasú de réir na hIarscríbhinne a ghabhann leis an Rialachán seo.Airteagal 2Tiocfaidh an Rialachán seo i bhfeidhm ar an tríú lá tar éis a fhoilsithe in Iris Oifigiúil an Aontais Eorpaigh .Beidh an Rialachán seo ina cheangal go huile agus go hiomlán agus infheidhme go díreach i ngach Ballstát.Arna dhéanamh sa Bhruiséil, an [...]Do Pharlaimint na hEorpa Don ChomhairleAn tUachtarán An tUachtaránIARSCRÍBHINNDéantar na hIarscríbhinní a ghabhann le Rialachán (CEE) Uimh. 1408/71 a leasú mar seo a leanas:1. In Iarscríbhinn I, Cuid I, faoin gceannteideal "I. ÉIRE", cuirtear an méid seo a leanas in ionad an téacs:"I. ÉIRE1. Measfar aon duine atá árachaithe go héigeantach nó go saorálach de bhun fhorálacha Airteagail 12, 24, agus 70 den Acht Comhdhlúite Leasa Shóisialaigh 2005 a bheith ina dhuine árachaithe nó ina duine árachaithe de réir bhrí Airteagal 1(a)(ii) den Rialachán.2. Measfar aon duine atá árachaithe go héigeantach nó go saorálach de bhun fhorálacha Airteagail 20 agus 24 den Acht Comhdhlúite Leasa Shóisialaigh 2005 a bheith ina dhuine féinfhostaithe nó ina duine féinfhostaithe de réir bhrí Airteagal 1 (a) (ii) den Rialachán".2. In Iarscríbhinn I, Cuid II, faoin gceannteideal "I. ÉIRE", cuirtear an méid seo a leanas in ionad an téacs:"I. ÉIRED'fhonn an ceart chun sochair chomhchineáil i leith breoiteachta nó máithreachais a chinneadh le linn an Rialachán a chur i bhfeidhm, ciallóidh na téarmaí 'ball teaghlaigh' agus 'duine den teaghlach' aon duine a mheastar a bheith ina chleithiúnaí nó ina cleithiúnaí de chuid duine féinfhostaithe le linn na hAchtanna Sláinte 1947-2004 a chur i bhfeidhm."3. In Iarscríbhinn II, Cuid I, faoin gceannteideal "H. AN FHRAINC", cuirtear an méid seo a leanas in ionad an téacs:"H. AN FHRAINCScéimeanna sochair fhorlíontaigh do dhaoine i dtrádálacha ceardaíochta, i slite beatha tionsclaíocha nó tráchtála nó i ngairmeacha liobrálacha, scéimeanna forlíontacha árachais seanaoise do dhaoine féinfhostaithe sna gairmeacha liobrálacha, scéimeanna lena gcumhdaítear easláine nó bás, agus scéimeanna sochair fhorlíontaigh seanaoise do liachleachtóirí agus do chúntóirí atá ar conradh, dá dtagraítear faoi seach in Airteagail L. 615-20, L. 644-1, L. 644-2, L. 645-1 agus L. 723-14 den Chód Slándála Sóisialta".4. In Iarscríbhinn II, Cuid II, faoin gceannteideal "S. AN PHOLAINN", cuirtear an méid seo a leanas in ionad an téacs:"S. AN PHOLAINNDeontas breithe íocaíochta-aonair (An tAcht Sochar Teaghlaigh)".5. In Iarscríbhinn IIa, faoin gceannteideal "I. ÉIRE", cuirtear an méid seo a leanas in ionad an téacs:"I. ÉIRE(a) Cúnamh Dífhostaíochta (An tAcht Comhdhlúite Leasa Shóisialaigh 2005, Cuid 3, Caibidil 2);(b) Pinsean Seanaoise (Neamhranníocach), (An tAcht Comhdhlúite Leasa Shóisialaigh 2005, Cuid 3, Caibidil 4);(c) Pinsean Baintrí (Neamhranníocach), Pinsean Baintrí Fir (Neamhranníocach) (An tAcht Comhdhlúite Leasa Shóisialaigh 2005, Cuid 3, Caibidil 6);(d) Liúntas Míchumais (An tAcht Comhdhlúite Leasa Shóisialaigh 2005, Cuid 3, Caibidil 10);(e) Liúntas Soghluaiseachta (an tAcht Sláinte 1970, Alt 61);(f) Pinsean Dall (An tAcht Comhdhlúite Leasa Shóisialaigh 2005, Cuid 3, Caibidil 5)".6. Leasaítear Iarscríbhinn III, Cuid A mar seo a leanas:(a) cuirtear an méid seo a leanas in ionad phointe 13 "AN GHEARMÁIN-AN UNGÁIR":"13. AN GHEARMÁIN-AN UNGÁIR(a) Airteagal 40(1)(b) de Chomhaontú an 2 Bealtaine 1998 maidir le Slándáil Shóisialta.(b) Pointe 16 den Phrótacal Dúnta a ghabhann leis an gCoinbhinsiún sin".(a) cuirtear an méid seo a leanas in ionad phointe 24 "AN UNGÁIR-AN OSTAIR":"24. AN UNGÁIR-AN OSTAIRAirteagal 36(3) den Choinbhinsiún maidir le Slándáil Shóisialta an 31 Márta 1999".7. Leasaítear Iarscríbhinn IV, Cuid A mar seo a leanas:(a) Cuirtear an méid seo a leanas in ionad an cheannteidil "I. ÉIRE":"I. ÉIRECuid II, caibidil 17 den Acht Comhdhlúite Leasa Shóisialaigh 2005".(b) Faoin gceannteideal "Q. AN ÍSILTÍR", cuirtear isteach an méid seo a leanas:"c) Acht an 10 Samhain 2005 " Wet werk en inkomen naar arbeidsvermogen (WIA)"."8. Leasaítear Iarscríbhinn IV, Cuid C mar seo a leanas:(a) scriostar an ceannteideal "O. AN UNGÁIR".Cuirtear an méid seo a leanas in ionad an cheannteidil "R. AN OSTAIR":"1. Maidir leis na hiarratais go léir ar shochair faoi Acht Cónaidhme an 9 Meán Fómhair 1955 um Shlándáil Shóisialta Ghinearálta (ASVG), faoi Acht Cónaidhme an 11 Deireadh Fómhair 1978 um Shlándáil Shóisialta Oibrithe Féinfhostaithe i dTrádálacha Tionsclaíocha agus Ceardaíochta (GSVG) agus faoi Acht Cónaidhme an 11 Deireadh Fómhair 1978 um Shlándáil Shóisialta Oibrithe Féinfhostaithe Talmhaíochta agus Foraoiseachta (BSVG), sa mhéid is nach bhfuil feidhm ag Airteagail 46b agus 46c den Rialachán, nó de bhun Airteagal 45 den Rialachán, féadfar cineál eile pinsin le rialacha ríomhaireachta is mó fabhar a roghnú.2. Maidir le hiarratais ar na sochair seo a leanas ar bhonn cuntais pinsin faoi Acht Ginearálta Pinsean (APG) an 18 Samhain 2004, sa mhéid is nach bhfuil feidhm ag Airteagail 46b agus 46c den Rialachán, nó de bhun Airteagal 45 den Rialachán, féadfar cineál eile pinsin le rialacha ríomhaireachta is mó fabhar a roghnú(a) pinsean seanaoise;(b) pinsin easláine;(c) pinsin mharthanóirí, sa mhéid is nach bhfuil aon mhéadú sochair le ríomh ar bhonn míonna árachais breise faoi Airteagal 7(2) den APG."9. Leasaítear Iarscríbhinn VI mar seo a leanas:(a) Faoin gceannteideal "C. AN DANMHAIRG"(i) i bpointe 6, scriostar na focail "an 20 Nollaig 1989".(a) cuirtear an méid seo a leanas in ionad phointe 11:"11. Tagann an sochar idirmheánach a íoctar le daoine dífhostaithe a thairbhigh den scéim "fleiscphoist" (ledighedsydelse) (de bhun an Achta um Bheartas Sóisialta Gníomhach) faoi réim Theideal III, Caibidil 6 (sochair dífhostaíochta). Maidir le daoine dífhostaithe a théann chuig Ballstát eile, beidh feidhm ag forálacha Airteagail 69 agus 71 den Rialachán seo i gcás ina bhfuil scéimeanna comhchosúla ag an mBallstát lena mbaineann don chatagóir céanna daoine".(b) Faoin gceannteideal "Q. AN ÍSILTÍR", cuirtear an méid seo a leanas in ionad phointe 4:“4. Cur chun feidhme reachtaíocht na hÍsiltíre maidir leis an éagumas chun oibre(a) Maidir le haon duine fostaithe nó féinfhostaithe nach bhfuil árachaithe a thuilleadh faoi Acht Easláine an 11 Nollaig 1975 (AAW), faoi Acht Árachais Easláine (Daoine Féinfhostaithe) an 24 Aibreán 1997 (WAZ), faoi Acht Árachais Easláine an 18 Feabhra 1966 (WAO) agus/nó faoi Acht Oibre agus Ioncaim de réir Cumais Saothair an 10 Samhain 2005 (WIA), meastar nó í a bheith árachaithe i gcás an riosca a bheith ann, chun críocha chur chun feidhme fhorálacha Chaibidil 3 de Theideal III den Rialachán, más rud go bhfuil an duine sin árachaithe faoi reachtaíocht Ballstáit eile i leith an riosca chéanna, nó, ina éagmais sin, i gcás sochar a bheith dlite de bhun reachtaíochta Ballstáit eile. Measfar an coinníoll deireanach sin a bheith comhlíonta, áfach, sa chás dá dtagraítear in Airteagal 48(1).(b) Más rud , de bhun phointe (a) go bhfuil an duine lena mbaineann i dteideal pinsin ón Ísiltír, íocfar an sochar sin de réir na rialacha atá leagtha síos in Airteagal 46(2) den Rialachán:(i) más rud go raibh an duine lena mbaineann ag gabháil d'obair mar dhuine fostaithe go deireanach sular tharla an t-éagumas chun oibre de réir bhrí Airteagal 1(a) den Rialachán, de réir na bhforálacha atá leagtha síos san WAO; Má tharla an t-éagumas chun oibre an 1 Eanáir 2004 nó dá éis, déanfar méid an tsochair a ríomh ar bhonn Acht Oibre agus Ioncaim de réir Cumais Saothair an 10 Samhain 2005 (WIA);(ii) más rud go raibh an duine lena mbaineann ag gabháil d'obair i gcáil seachas mar dhuine fostaithe go deireanach sular tharla an t-éagumas chun oibre de réir bhrí Airteagal 1(a) den Rialachán, de réir na bhforálacha atá leagtha síos san Acht Árachais Éagumais (Daoine Féinfhostaithe) (WAZ);(c) D'fhonn na sochair a íocadh de réir Acht Árachais Easláine réamhluaite an 18 Feabhra 1966 (WAO), Acht Oibre agus Ioncaim de réir Cumais Saothair an 10 Samhain 2005 (WIA) nó Acht Árachais Easláine an 24 Aibreán 1997, cuirfidh institiúidí na hÍsiltíre na nithe seo a leanas i gcuntas:- Tréimhsí fostaíochta íoctha agus tréimhsí a ndéileálfar leo amhlaidh agus a cuireadh i gcrích san Ísiltír roimh 1 Iúil 1967;- Tréimhsí árachais a cuireadh i gcrích faoi Acht réamhluaite an 18 Feabhra 1966 (WAO);- Tréimhsí árachais a bheidh curtha i gcrích ag an duine lena mbaineann i ndiaidh aois 15 bliana faoi Acht réamhluaite an 15 Nollaig 1975 (AAW) sa mhéid is nach bhfuil siad ar aon-tráth leis na tréimhsí árachais a cuireadh i gcrích faoi Acht réamhluaite an 18 Feabhra 1966 (WAO);- Tréimhsí árachais a cuireadh i gcrích de réir Acht Árachais Easláine (Daoine Féinfhostaithe) an 24 Aibreán 1997 (WAZ);- Tréimhsí árachais a cuireadh i gcrích de réir Acht Oibre agus Ioncaim de réir Cumais Saothair an 10 Samhain 2005 (WIA).(d) Le linn sochar éagumais na hÍsiltíre a ríomh de bhun Airteagal 40(1) den Rialachán, ní chuireann údaráis na hÍsiltíre i gcuntas aon fhorlíonta a deonaíodh faoi fhorálacha an Achta um Fhorlíonta. Déanfar an ceart chun forlíon a fháil agus méid an chéanna a ríomh ar bhonn an Achta um Fhorlíonta amháin."(c) Faoin gceannteideal "R. AN OSTAIR", cuirtear isteach an pointe seo a leanas:"10. D'fhonn an méid teoiriciúil i leith sochar bunaithe ar chuntas pinsin faoin Acht Ginearálta Pinsean ( Allgemeines Pensionsgesetz – APG) an 18 Samhain 2004 chun críocha Airteagal 46(2)(a) den Rialachán, cuireann an t-údarás inniúil i gcuntas, i leith gach míosa árachais a bheidh curtha i gcrích faoi reachtaíocht Ballstát eile, an chion den chreidmheas iomlán a chinnfear de réir an APG ar an dáta tagartha, a fhreagraíonn do chomhrann an chreidmheasa iomláin agus líon na míonna árachais ar a bhfuil an creidmheas iomlán bunaithe."10. In Iarscríbhinn VIII, cuirtear an méid seo a leanas in ionad an cheannteidil "I. ÉIRE":"I. ÉIRESochair linbh, liúntas dílleachta (ranníocach) agus méaduithe ar phinsean baintrí (ranníocach) agus ar phinsean baintrí fir (ranníocach), is iníoctha i leith leanaí incháilithe faoin Acht Comhdhlúite Leasa Shóisialaigh 2005 agus aon reachtaíocht leasaitheach dá éis sin".[1] IO C an, lch. .[2] IO C an, lch. .[3] IO C an, lch. .[4] IO C an, lch. .[5] IO L 149, 5.7.1971, lch. 2; Rialachán arna leasú go deireanach le Rialachán (CE) Uimh. 1992/2006 (IO L 392, 30.12.2006, lch. 1).


type: contracts

text:
 30.7.2015
 BG
 Официален вестник на Европейския съюз
 L 202/96
 РЕШЕНИЕ НА СЪВМЕСТНИЯ КОМИТЕТ НА ЕИП
 No 208/2014
 от 30 септември 2014 година
 за изменение на приложение XX (Околна среда) към Споразумението за ЕИП [2015/1276]
 СЪВМЕСТНИЯТ КОМИТЕТ НА ЕИП,
 като взе предвид Споразумението за Европейското икономическо пространство („Споразумението за ЕИП“), и по-специално член 98 от него,
 като има предвид, че:
 (1)
 Директива 2009/128/ЕО на Европейския парламент и на Съвета от 21 октомври 2009 г. за създаване на рамка за действие на Общността за постигане на устойчива употреба на пестициди (1), поправена в ОВ L 161, 29.6.2010 г., стр. 11, следва да бъде включена в Споразумението за ЕИП.
 (2)
 Поради това приложение XX към Споразумението за ЕИП следва да бъде съответно изменено,
 ПРИЕ НАСТОЯЩОТО РЕШЕНИЕ:
 Член 1
 След точка 1к (Директива 2003/35/ЕО на Европейския парламент и на Съвета) от приложение XX към Споразумението за ЕИП се вмъква следното:
 „1л.
 32009 L 0128: Директива 2009/128/ЕО на Европейския парламент и на Съвета от 21 октомври 2009 г. за създаване на рамка за действие на Общността за постигане на устойчива употреба на пестициди (ОВ L 309, 24.11.2009 г., стр. 71), поправена в ОВ L 161, 29.6.2010 г., стр. 11.
 За целите на настоящото споразумение разпоредбите на директивата се тълкуват със следната адаптация:
 По отношение на Норвегия думите „26 ноември 2012 г.“ в член 4, параграф 2 се заменят с думите 1 януари 2016 г.“
 Член 2
 Текстовете на Директива 2009/128/ЕО на исландски и норвежки език, които ще бъдат публикувани в притурката за ЕИП на Официален вестник на Европейския съюз, са автентични.
 Член 3
 Настоящото решение влиза в сила на 1 октомври 2014 г., при условие че всички нотификации, предвидени в член 103, параграф 1 от Споразумението за ЕИП, са внесени в Съвместния комитет на ЕИП (2), или на датата, на която влиза в сила Решение на Съвместния комитет No 30/2014 от 30 септември 2014 г. (3), ако тази дата е по-късна.
 Член 4
 Настоящото решение се публикува в раздела за ЕИП и в притурката за ЕИП към Официален вестник на Европейския съюз.
 Съставено в Брюксел на 30 септември 2014 година.
 За Съвместния комитет на ЕИП
 Председател
 Kurt JÄGER
 (1) ОВ L 309, 24.11.2009 г., стр. 71.
 (2) С отбелязани конституционни изисквания.
 (3) Вж. страница 57 от настоящия брой на Официален вестник.


text:
 23.2.2013
 RO
 Jurnalul Oficial al Uniunii Europene
 C 55/13
 Ordonanța Tribunalului din 7 ianuarie 2013 — Alfastar Benelux/Consiliul
 (Cauza T-274/12) (1)
 (Acțiune în constatarea abținerii de a acționa - Litigiu rămas fără obiect - Nepronunțare asupra fondului - Acțiune în despăgubire - Acțiune vădit nefondată)
 2013/C 55/24
 Limba de procedură: engleza
 Părțile
 Reclamantă: Alfastar Benelux (Ixelles, Belgia) (reprezentanți: N. Keramidas și N. Korogiannakis, avocați)
 Pârât: Consiliul Uniunii Europene (reprezentanți: M. Vitsentzatos și E. Chatziioakeimidou, agenți)
 Obiectul
 Pe de o parte, cerere având ca obiect constatarea faptului că Consiliul nu și-a îndeplinit obligațiile care îi revin în temeiul articolului 266 TFUE, întrucât s-a abținut să adopte măsurile pe care le presupune executarea Hotărârii Tribunalului din 20 octombrie 2011, Alfastar Benelux/Consiliul (T-57/09, nepublicată în Repertoriu), și, pe de altă parte, cerere având ca obiect obținerea de daune interese în temeiul articolului 340 TFUE
 Dispozitivul
 1.
 Constată că nu mai este necesar să se pronunțe asupra cererii având ca obiect constatarea abținerii de a acționa formulată de Alfastar Benelux SA.
 2.
 Respinge ca vădit nefondată cererea de despăgubiri formulată de Alfastar Benelux.
 3.
 Alfastar Benelux suportă 50 % din propriile cheltuieli de judecată, precum și 50 % din cheltuielile de judecată efectuate de Consiliul Uniunii Europene. Consiliul suportă 50 % din propriile cheltuieli de judecată, precum și 50 % din cheltuielile de judecată efectuate de Alfastar Benelux.
 (1) JO C 243, 11.8.2012.


text:
 EUROPSKA KOMISIJA
 Bruxelles, 15.11.2016.
 COM(2016) 712 final
 2016/0349(NLE)
 Prijedlog
 ODLUKE VIJEĆA
 o pristupanju EU-a Međunarodnom savjetodavnom odboru za pamuk (ICAC)
 OBRAZLOŽENJE
 1. KONTEKST PRIJEDLOGA
 Međunarodni savjetodavni odbor za pamuk (ICAC) je međunarodno robno tijelo (ICB) za pamuk. Njegova je misija pomagati vladama u podupiranju zdravog svjetskog tržišta pamuka. To čini osiguravajući transparentnost na svjetskom tržištu pamuka, služeći kao centar za razmjenu tehničkih informacija o proizvodnji pamuka i forum za rasprave o pitanjima od međunarodne važnosti koja se odnose na pamuk. ICAC ima ulogu statističkog promatrača te okuplja zemlje u kojima se pamuk proizvodi, troši i u kojima se njime trguje te sve segmente sektora pamuka. Općenito je njegova uloga pospješivanje i ne bavi se formiranjem ili određivanjem cijene.
 ICAC je jedan od rijetkih ICB-ova
 1
 u čijem članstvu nije Europska unija (EU), iako je devet država članica samostalno postalo članicama ICAC-a (Belgija, Njemačka, Grčka, Finska, Francuska, Italija, Nizozemska, Poljska i Španjolska). Članstvo u ICAC-u u interesu je Unije zbog važnosti pamuka za njezino gospodarstvo. EU je proizvođač pamuka i od neto uvoznika pamuka (do 2008.) razvio se 2009. u neto izvoznika pamuka. Tekstilno-odjevni sektor EU-a važan je korisnik pamučne tkanine. Štoviše, pamuk je važno područje za europsku razvojnu suradnju, pri čemu je EU i dalje glavni donator afričkog sektora pamuka.
 Vijeće Europske unije u više je navrata (posebno u svojim zaključcima od 2004. (ref. 8972/04), 2008. (ref. 9986/08) i 2010. (ref. 9648/10)) zahtijevalo da Europska komisija razmotri članstvo EU-a u ICAC-u. Ovlastilo je Komisiju 2013. za pregovaranje, u ime Europske unije i na temelju pregovaračkih smjernica, o pristupanju Unije ICAC-u (Odluka Vijeća 13406/13, 16. rujna 2013.). S obzirom na pristupanje Unije ICAC-u, sve države članice obavijestile su ICAC o svojem istupanju iz članstva u skladu s člankom II odjeljkom 3 Pravila i propisa ICAC-a
 2
 .
 2.
 PRAVNA OSNOVA
 Budući da su trgovinska pitanja među najvažnijim zadataćama ICAC-a, pravna bi osnova trebao biti članak 207. UFEU-a.
 3.REZULTATI SAVJETOVANJA S DIONICIMA I PROCJENE UČINAKA
 Uzimajući u obzir trenutačnu situaciju Komisija smatra da bi članstvo u ICAC-u bilo poželjno jer bi se njime:
 –EU-u omogućilo jednoglasno izražavanje stajališta o pamuku i uplaćivanje jednog doprinosa odgovarajućem ICB-u, uzimajući u obzir stajališta država članica EU-a,
 –EU-u omogućio pristup informacijama o pitanjima koja se odnose na pamuk kako bi pratio događanja na tržištu pamuka i utjecao na agendu za pamuk,
 –olakšalo veze i partnerstva između privatnog sektora EU-a (pamuk i tekstil), proizvođača i potrošača pamuka (iz EU-a i zemalja u razvoju) i javnih tijela.
 Tajništvo ICAC-a ima pozitivan stav o članstvu EU-a jer će se njime povećati važnost i međunarodni status ICAC-a kao ICB-a. Konačno je potvrdilo da EU ne snosi nikakvu odgovornost za bilo koje tekuće ili buduće dospjele neplaćene obveze bilo kojeg člana.
 4.
 UTJECAJ NA PRORAČUN
 Članstvo u ICAC-u temelji se na plaćanju godišnjeg doprinosa. On se izračunava na godišnjoj razini kao funkcija broja članova ICAC-a (fiksni dio) i količine sirovog pamuka kojim svaki član trguje (promjenjivi dio). Zahtijevao bi se prvi doprinos u iznosu od najviše 400 000 eura, kojim će se EU-u dati odgovarajući utjecaj u poslovima ICAC-a i omogućiti široka uključenost u ICAC-ove aktivnosti.
 5.
 DRUGI ELEMENTI: planovi provedbe
 Unija će osigurati da se sve pogodnosti njezina pristupanja dijele s državama članicama Unije. Članstvo u podoborima i radnim skupinama bit će otvoreno za predstavnike iz država članica kao dijela delegacije Unije, uzimajući u obzir važnost cijelog lanca vrijednosti povezanog s pamukom, uključujući proizvodnju i potrošnju u regijama Unije u kojima je on važan za poljoprivredno i industrijsko gospodarstvo i sektor trgovine. Posebno će u Savjetodavnom tijelu privatnog sektora (PSAP) predstavnika Europske komisije pratiti zamjenici i promatrači na zahtjev država članica u skladu s člankom VI odjeljkom 3 a. (1) Pravila i propisa ICAC-a.
 2016/0349 (NLE)
 Prijedlog
 ODLUKE VIJEĆA
 o pristupanju EU-a Međunarodnom savjetodavnom odboru za pamuk (ICAC)
 VIJEĆE EUROPSKE UNIJE,
 uzimajući u obzir Ugovor o funkcioniranju Europske unije, a posebno njegov članak 207. stavke 3. i 4., u vezi s člankom 218. stavkom 6.,
 uzimajući u obzir prijedlog Europske komisije,
 uzimajući u obzir suglasnost Europskog parlamenta
 3
 ,
 budući da:
 (1)Europska unija (EU) nije član Međunarodnog savjetodavnog odbora za pamuk, a već je član brojnih međunarodnih robnih tijela.
 (2)Vijeće je 27. travnja 2004., 27. svibnja 2008. i 10. svibnja 2010. u zaključcima o Akcijskom planu EU-a o lancima poljoprivredne robe, ovisnosti i siromaštvu, o partnerstvu EU-a i Afrike u svrhu potpore razvoju sektora pamuka odnosno jačanju djelovanja EU-a u području robe, Komisiju pozvalo na razmatranje članstva EU-a u Međunarodnom savjetodavnom odboru za pamuk.
 (3)Vijeće je 16. rujna 2013. ovlastilo Komisiju za pregovaranje, u ime Europske unije, o pristupanju Unije ICAC-u u skladu s člankom II, odjeljcima 1 i 2 njegovih Pravila i propisa
 4
 , pri čemu je navelo da je članstvo u ICAC-u u interesu Unije zbog važnosti pamuka za gospodarstvo Unije; EU je proizvođač pamuka i od neto uvoznika pamuka (do 2008.) razvio se 2009. u neto izvoznika pamuka. Tekstilno-odjevni sektor EU-a važan je korisnik pamučne tkanine. Štoviše, pamuk je važno područje za europsku razvojnu suradnju, pri čemu je EU i dalje glavni donator afričkog sektora pamuka.
 (4)Unija će uplatiti doprinos u skladu s člankom II odjeljkom 2 a. (2) (c) Pravila i propisa ICAC-a. EU ne može snositi odgovornost za bilo koje tekuće ili buduće dospjele neplaćene obveze bilo kojeg člana ICAC-a.
 (5)Nakon pristupanja Unije ICAC-u i dalje bi trebalo uzimati u obzir Protokol 4. o pamuku Akta o pristupanju Helenske Republike Uniji
 5
 ,
 DONIJELO JE OVU ODLUKU:
 Članak 1.
 U ime Unije odobrava se pristupanje Europske unije Međunarodnom savjetodavnom odboru za pamuk.
 Članak 2.
 Predsjednik Vijeća određuje osobu koja u ime Europske unije ima ovlast za priopćavanje ove Odluke Međunarodnom savjetodavnom odboru za pamuk.
 Članak 3.
 Ova Odluka stupa na snagu sljedećeg dana od dana objave u Službenom listu Europske unije.
 Sastavljeno u Bruxellesu
 Za Vijeće
 Predsjednik
 (1)
 EU je član međunarodnih organizacija za kavu, za kakao, za tropsko drvo i za šećer, međunarodnih vijeća za maslinovo ulje i za žitarice te međunarodnih studijskih grupa za gumu, za olovo i cink, za nikal i za obojene metale.
 (2)
 Vidjeti službeno web-mjesto ICAC-a: https://www.icac.org/about-International-Cotton-Advisory-Committee/rules
 (3)
 SL C , , str. .
 (4)
 Pravila i propisi Međunarodnog savjetodavnog odbora za pamuk kako su doneseni na 31. plenarnoj sjednici održanoj 16. lipnja 1972., s izmjenama sa 74. plenarne sjednice održane 11. prosinca 2015. Vidjeti službeno web-mjesto ICAC-a: https://www.icac.org/about-International-Cotton-Advisory-Committee/rules
 (5)
 Službeni list Europske unije, L 291, 19.11.1979.


text:
 22.1.2015
 CS
 Úřední věstník Evropské unie
 L 15/81
 ROZHODNUTÍ SMÍŠENÉHO VÝBORU EHP
 č. 155/2014
 ze dne 9. července 2014,
 kterým se mění příloha XXII (Právo obchodních společností) Dohody o EHP [2015/90]
 SMÍŠENÝ VÝBOR EHP,
 s ohledem na Dohodu o Evropském hospodářském prostoru (dále jen „Dohoda o EHP“), a zejména na článek 98 této dohody,
 vzhledem k těmto důvodům:
 (1)
 Prováděcí rozhodnutí Komise 2013/288/EU ze dne 13. června 2013, kterým se mění rozhodnutí 2011/30/EU o rovnocennosti systémů veřejného dohledu, zajištění kvality, vyšetřování a sankcí některých třetích zemí, které se vztahují na auditory a auditorské subjekty, a o přechodném období pro auditorské činnosti auditorů a auditorských subjektů z některých třetích zemí v Evropské unii (1), by mělo být začleněno do Dohody o EHP.
 (2)
 Příloha XXII Dohody o EHP by proto měla být odpovídajícím způsobem změněna,
 PŘIJAL TOTO ROZHODNUTÍ:
 Článek 1
 V bodě 10fd (rozhodnutí Komise 2011/30/EU) přílohy XXII Dohody o EHP se doplňují nová slova a nová odrážka, které znějí:
 „ve znění:
 —
 32013 D 0288: prováděcí rozhodnutí Komise 2013/288/EU ze dne 13. června 2013 (Úř. věst. L 163, 15.6.2013, s. 26).“
 Článek 2
 Znění prováděcího rozhodnutí 2013/288/EU v islandském a norském jazyce, která mají být zveřejněna v dodatku EHP Úředního věstníku Evropské unie, jsou platná.
 Článek 3
 Toto rozhodnutí vstupuje v platnost dnem 10. července 2014 za předpokladu, že jsou učiněna veškerá oznámení podle čl. 103 odst. 1 Dohody o EHP (2).
 Článek 4
 Toto rozhodnutí bude zveřejněno v oddíle EHP a v dodatku EHP Úředního věstníku Evropské unie.
 V Bruselu dne 9. července 2014.
 Za Smíšený výbor EHP
 předseda
 Kurt JÄGER
 (1) Úř. věst. L 163, 15.6.2013, s. 26.
 (2) Nebyly oznámeny žádné ústavní požadavky.
 Prohlášení států ESVO k rozhodnutí Smíšeného výboru EHP č. 155/2014 ze dne 9. července 2014, kterým se do Dohody o EHP začleňuje prováděcí rozhodnutí Komise 2013/288/EU
 „Prováděcí rozhodnutí Komise 2013/288/EU ze dne 13. června 2013 se zabývá rovnocenností pro třetí země. Začleněním tohoto rozhodnutí není dotčena působnost Dohody o EHP.“


text:
 Cluichí Ceannais
 Athimirt (scór an chéad chluiche i lúibíní)
 ^ Athimirt i ndiaidh achomhairc
 § Níor chríochnaíodh an cluiche
 Liosta na mBuaiteoirí
 Átháin (19) 1931, 1933-1939, 1942-48, 1955, 1998-99, 2004
 Tobar Phádraig (18) 1965-66, 1969-70, 1977, 1979, 1982-84, 1987-88, 1990, 1993, 1995-97, 2000, 2003
 Cill Mocheallóg (11) 1960, 1967, 1973-75, 1985, 1992, 1994, 2010, 2012, 2014
 Clochán (10) 1914-16, 1918, 1926, 1957-58, 1968, 1971, 1986
 Saor Theas (7) 1888-1890, 1972, 1976, 1978, 1981
 Éire Óg (7) 1902, 1910, 1920, 1922, 1928, 1930, 1932
 Cromadh (6) 1908, 1919, 1924, 1929, 1940-41
 An Cheapach Mhór (5) 1904, 1954, 1956, 1959, 1964
 Áth Dara (5) 2001-02, 2007-09
 Na Piarsaigh (3) 2011, 2013, 2015
 Cathair Laighin (3) 1896, 1905, 1907
 Sáirséalaigh an Chonartha (3) 1951-53
 Brú Rí (2) 1893, 2006
 Cill Fhionáin (2) 1897, 1899
 Feadamar (2) 1912, 1927
 An Caisleán Nua Thiar (2) 1917, 1925
 Naomh Pádraig (2) 1949, 1950
 Gaeil an Iarthair (2) 1961-62
 Baile Brún (2) 1989, 1991
 Máigh Rua (1) 1887
 Carraig an Chonartha (1) 1891
 Naomh Mícheál (1) 1895
 Na Seamróga (1) 1898
 Cnoc na Sailí (1) 1900
 Baile an Gharrdha (1) 1911
 Caisleán Uí Chonaill (1) 1909
 Fíonach/Cill Mhíde (1) 1963
 Cill Íde (1) 1980
 Garrdha Uí Spiolláin (1) 2005
 Tagairtí
 Craobhacha iomána
 CLG Chontae Luimnigh


jurisdiction: US

text:
 117 HR 4759 IH: Revitalizing Downtowns Act
 U.S. House of Representatives
 2021-07-28
 text/xml
 EN
 Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.
 I117th CONGRESS1st SessionH. R. 4759IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVESJuly 28, 2021Mr. Gomez (for himself, Mr. Larson of Connecticut, and Mr. Kildee) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and MeansA BILLTo amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide an investment credit for the conversion of office buildings into other uses.1.Short titleThis Act may be cited as the Revitalizing Downtowns Act.2.Credit for qualified office conversion(a)In generalSection 46 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking and at the end of paragraph (5), by striking the period at the end of paragraph (6) and inserting , and, and by adding at the end the following new paragraph:(7)the qualified office conversion credit..(b)Amount of creditSubpart E of part IV of subchapter A of chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by inserting after section 48C the following new section:48D.Qualified office conversion credit(a)In generalFor purposes of section 46, the qualified office conversion credit for any taxable year is equal to 20 percent of the qualified conversion expenditures with respect to a qualified converted building.(b)When expenditures taken into account(1)In generalQualified conversion expenditures with respect to any qualified converted building shall be taken into account for the taxable year in which such qualified converted building is placed in service.(2)Coordination with subsection (d)The amount which would (but for this subparagraph) be taken into account under subparagraph (A) with respect to any qualified converted building shall be reduced (but not below zero) by any amount of qualified conversion expenditures taken into account under subsection (d) by the taxpayer or a predecessor of the taxpayer (or, in the case of a sale and leaseback described in section 50(a)(2)(C), by the lessee), to the extent any amount so taken into account has not been required to be recaptured under section 50(a). (c)Definitions(1)Qualified converted building(A)In generalThe term qualified converted building means any building (and its structural components) if—(i)prior to conversion, such building was nonresidential real property (as defined in section 168) which was leased, or available for lease, to office tenants,(ii)such building has been substantially converted from an office use to a residential, retail, or other commercial use,(iii)in the case of conversion to a residential use, such converted building meets the requirements of subparagraph (D), (iv)such building was initially placed in service at least 25 years before the beginning of the conversion, and(v)depreciation (or amortization in lieu of depreciation) is allowable with respect to such building.(B)Substantially converted defined(i)In generalFor purposes of paragraph (1)(A)(ii), a building shall be treated as having been substantially converted only if the qualified conversion expenditures during the 24-month period selected by the taxpayer (at the time and in the manner prescribed by regulation) and ending with or within the taxable year exceed the greater of—(I)the adjusted basis of such building (and its structural components), or(II)$15,000.The adjusted basis of the building (and its structural components) shall be determined as of the beginning of the 1st day of such 24-month period, or of the holding period of the building, whichever is later. For purposes of the preceding sentence, the determination of the beginning of the holding period shall be made without regard to any reconstruction by the taxpayer in connection with the conversion. (ii)Special rule for phased conversionIn the case of any conversion which may reasonably be expected to be completed in phases set forth in architectural plans and specifications completed before the conversion begins, clause (i) shall be applied by substituting 60-month period for 24-month period.(iii)LesseesThe Secretary shall prescribe by regulation rules for applying this subparagraph to lessees.(C)ReconstructionConversion includes reconstruction.(D)Residential conversion requirements(i)In generalA building meets the requirements of this subparagraph if—(I)20 percent or more of the residential units are both rent-restricted and occupied by individuals whose income is 80 percent or less of area median gross income, or(II)such building is subject to a written binding State or local agreement with respect to the provision or financing of affordable housing and such agreement is documented in such form and manner as the Secretary may provide.(ii)Rent and income limitationFor purposes of this subparagraph, rules similar to the rules of subsection (g) of section 42 shall apply to determine whether a unit is rent-restricted, treatment of units occupied by individuals whose incomes rise above the limit, and the treatment of units where Federal rental assistance is reduced as tenant’s income increases. (2)Qualified conversion expenditures defined(A)In generalFor purposes of subsection (a), the term qualified conversion expenditures means any amount properly chargeable to capital account—(i)for property for which depreciation is allowable under section 168 and which is—(I)nonresidential real property (as defined in section 168),(II)residential rental property (as defined in section 168), or(III)an addition or improvement to property described in clause (i) or (ii), and(ii)in connection with the conversion of a qualified converted building.(B)Certain expenditures not includedThe term qualified conversion expenditures does not include—(i)Straight line depreciation must be usedAny expenditure with respect to which the taxpayer does not use the straight line method over a recovery period determined under subsection (c) or (g) of section 168. The preceding sentence shall not apply to any expenditure to the extent the alternative depreciation system of section 168(g) applies to such expenditure by reason of subparagraph (B) or (C) of section 168(g)(1).(ii)Cost of acquisitionThe cost of acquiring any building or interest therein.(iii)EnlargementsAny expenditure attributable to the enlargement of an existing building.(iv)Tax-exempt use propertyAny expenditure in connection with the conversion of a building which is allocable to the portion of such property which is (or may reasonably be expected to be) tax-exempt use property (within the meaning of section 168(h)), except that—(I)50 percent shall be substituted for 35 percent in paragraph (1)(B)(iii) thereof, and(II)an eligible educational institution (as defined in section 529(e)(5)) shall not be treated as a tax-exempt entity.This clause shall not apply for purposes of determining whether a building has been substantially converted. (v)Expenditures of lesseeAny expenditure of a lessee of a building if, on the date the conversion is completed, the remaining term of the lease (determined without regard to any renewal periods) is less than the recovery period determined under section 168(c).(d)Progress expenditures(1)In generalIn the case of any building to which this subsection applies, except as provided in paragraph (3)—(A)if such building is self-converted property, any qualified conversion expenditure with respect to such building shall be taken into account for the taxable year for which such expenditure is properly chargeable to capital account with respect to such building, and(B)if such building is not self-converted property, any qualified conversion expenditure with respect to such building shall be taken into account for the taxable year in which paid.(2)Property to which subsection applies(A)In generalThis subsection shall apply to any building which is being converted by or for the taxpayer if—(i)the normal conversion period for such building is 2 years or more, and(ii)it is reasonable to expect that such building will be a qualified converted building in the hands of the taxpayer when it is placed in service.Clauses (i) and (ii) shall be applied on the basis of facts known as of the close of the taxable year of the taxpayer in which the conversion begins (or, if later, at the close of the first taxable year to which an election under this subsection applies). (B)Normal conversion periodFor purposes of subparagraph (A), the term normal conversion period means the period reasonably expected to be required for the conversion of the building—(i)beginning with the date on which physical work on the conversion begins (or, if later, the first day of the first taxable year to which an election under this subsection applies), and(ii)ending on the date on which it is expected that the property will be available for placing in service.(3)Special rules for applying paragraph (1)For purposes of paragraph (1)—(A)Component parts, etcProperty which is to be a component part of, or is otherwise to be included in, any building to which this subsection applies shall be taken into account—(i)at a time not earlier than the time at which it becomes irrevocably devoted to use in the building, and(ii)as if (at the time referred to in clause (i)) the taxpayer had expended an amount equal to that portion of the cost to the taxpayer of such component or other property which, for purposes of this subpart, is properly chargeable (during such taxable year) to capital account with respect to such building.(B)Certain borrowing disregardedAny amount borrowed directly or indirectly by the taxpayer from the person converting the property for him shall not be treated as an amount expended for such conversion.(C)Limitation for buildings which are not self-converted(i)In generalIn the case of a building which is not self-converted, the amount taken into account under paragraph (1)(B) for any taxable year shall not exceed the amount which represents the portion of the overall cost to the taxpayer of the conversion which is properly attributable to the portion of the conversion which is completed during such taxable year.(ii)Carryover of certain amountsIn the case of a building which is not a self-converted building, if for the taxable year—(I)the amount which (but for clause (i)) would have been taken into account under paragraph (1)(B) exceeds the limitation of clause (i), then the amount of such excess shall be taken into account under paragraph (1)(B) for the succeeding taxable year, or(II)the limitation of clause (i) exceeds the amount taken into account under paragraph (1)(B), then the amount of such excess shall increase the limitation of clause (i) for the succeeding taxable year.(D)Determination of percentage of completionThe determination under subparagraph (C)(i) of the portion of the overall cost to the taxpayer of the conversion which is properly attributable to conversion completed during any taxable year shall be made, under regulations prescribed by the Secretary, on the basis of engineering or architectural estimates or on the basis of cost accounting records. Unless the taxpayer establishes otherwise by clear and convincing evidence, the conversion shall be deemed to be completed not more rapidly than ratably over the normal conversion period.(E)No progress expenditures for certain prior periodsNo qualified conversion expenditures shall be taken into account under this subsection for any period before the first day of the first taxable year to which an election under this subsection applies.(F)No progress expenditures for property for year it is placed in service, etcIn the case of any building, no qualified conversion expenditures shall be taken into account under this subsection for the earlier of—(i)the taxable year in which the building is placed in service, or(ii)the first taxable year for which recapture is required under section 50(a)(2) with respect to such property,or for any taxable year thereafter. (4)Self-converted buildingFor purposes of this subsection, the term self-converted building means any building if it is reasonable to believe that more than half of the qualified conversion expenditures for such building will be made directly by the taxpayer.(5)ElectionThis subsection shall apply to any taxpayer only if such taxpayer has made an election under this paragraph. Such an election shall apply to the taxable year for which made and all subsequent taxable years. Such an election, once made, may be revoked only with the consent of the Secretary.(e)Denial of double benefitA credit shall not be allowed under this section for any qualified conversion expenditure for which a credit is allowed under section 42 or 47..(c)Conforming amendments(1)Section 49(a)(1)(C) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking and at the end of clause (iv), by striking the period at the end of clause (v) and inserting , and, and by adding after clause (v) the following new clause:(vi)the portion of the basis of any qualified converted property attributable to qualified conversion expenditures under section 48D..(2)Section 50(a)(2)(E) of such Code is amended by striking or 48C(b)(2) and inserting 48C(b)(2), or 48D(d).(3)Section 50(b)(2) of such Code is amended by striking and at the end of subparagraph (C), by striking the period at the end of subparagraph (D) and inserting ; and, and by adding after subparagraph (D) the following new subparagraph:(E)a qualified converted building to the extent of that portion of the basis which is attributable to qualified conversion expenditures..(4)Section 50(b)(3) is amended by inserting , or, solely with respect to the qualified office conversion credit, an eligible educational institution (as defined in section 529(e)(5)) after section 521.(5)The table of sections for subpart E of part IV of subchapter A of chapter 1 of such Code is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 48C the following new item:Sec. 48D. Qualified office conversion credit..(d)Effective dateThe amendments made by this section shall apply to qualified conversion expenditures incurred after the date of enactment in taxable years ending after such date.


text:
Persija Jakarta 1-0 PSMS Medan (Video Highlight)- 12, Feb 2018| Rezilta.com
 FT: Persija Jakarta 1-0 PSMS Medan ( HT0-0) on 12, Feb 2018
 Fri 8, Jun 2018 Pstni 0-5 Persija Jakarta 0-2
 Wed 30, May 2018 Barito Putera 2-1 Persija Jakarta 1-0
 Fri 25, May 2018 Persija Jakarta 2-0 Persipura Jayapura 1-0
 Tue 8, May 2018 Home United FC 3-2 Persija Jakarta 2-1
 Fri 20, Apr 2018 PSIS Semarang 1-4 Persija Jakarta 0-0
 Sat 14, Apr 2018 Persija Jakarta 2-0 Borneo F.C. 1-0


text:
Julia Goldani Telles (* 18. März 1995 in Los Angeles, Kalifornien, Vereinigte Staaten) ist eine US-amerikanische Schauspielerin und Balletttänzerin. Ihre im deutschsprachigen Raum bekanntesten Rollen sind die der „Whitney Solloway“ in der Serie The Affair sowie die der „Sasha Torres“ in New in Paradise (Bunheads).
 Leben
 Goldani Telles wurde in Los Angeles, Kalifornien als Tochter einer Brasilianerin und eines mexikanisch-amerikanischen Vaters geboren. Im Alter von knapp zwei Jahren zog sie mit ihren Eltern nach Rio de Janeiro, wo sie auch im Alter von fünf Jahren, mit dem Balletttanzen begann. Kurz darauf jedoch schon, zog die Familie zurück in die USA, zuerst wieder nach Los Angeles. Bis dato beherrschte sie ausschließlich die portugiesische Sprache. Später erfolgte ein Umzug nach New York City, wo sie die Professional Children's School in Manhattan besuchte und an der School of American Ballet sowie an der Ballet Academy East zur Balletttänzerin ausgebildet wurde. Seit 2012 tritt sie als Schauspielerin in Erscheinung.
 Filmografie (Auswahl)
 2012–2013: New in Paradise (Bundheads, Fernsehserie, 17 Folgen)
 2014: Nurse Jackie (Fernsehserie, 3 Folgen)
 2014–2019: The Affair (Fernsehserie, 28 Folgen)
 2018: Most Likely to Murder
 2018: Slender Man
 2018: The Wind
 2020: Looks That Kill
 2021: The Space Between – Im Rausch der Musik (The Space Between)
 seit 2021: The Girlfriend Experience (Fernsehserie)
 Weblinks
 Einzelnachweise
 Filmschauspieler
 US-Amerikaner
 Geboren 1995
 Frau


text:
 Tähtis õiguslik teade
 |
 21997D0123(01)
 Euroopa Liidu Teataja L 021 , 23/01/1997 Lk 0001 - 0002
 EMP Ühiskomitee otsusnr 48/96,4. oktoober 1996,millega muudetakse EMP lepingu II lisa (tehnilised normid, standardid, katsetamine ja sertifitseerimine)EMP ÜHISKOMITEE,võttes arvesse Euroopa Majanduspiirkonna lepingut, mida on kohandatud Euroopa Majanduspiirkonna lepingut kohandava protokolliga, edaspidi "leping", eelkõige selle artiklit 98,ning arvestades, et:lepingu II lisa muudeti EMP Ühiskomitee 22. juuni 1995. aasta otsusega nr 48/95; [1]lepingusse tuleb lisada komisjoni 31. mai 1995. aasta otsus 95/204/EÜ, millega rakendatakse ehitustooteid käsitleva nõukogu direktiivi 89/106/EMÜ artikli 20 lõige 2, [2]ON VASTU VÕTNUD JÄRGMISE OTSUSE:Artikkel 1Lepingu II lisa XXI peatüki punktile 1 (nõukogu direktiiv 89/106/EMÜ) lisatakse järgmine taane:"— 395 D 0204: komisjoni otsus 95/204/EÜ, 31. mai 1995 (EÜT L 129, 14.6.1995, lk 23).".Artikkel 2Komisjoni otsuse 95/204/EÜ islandi- ja norrakeelne tekst, mis on lisatud käesoleva otsuse vastavates keeltes versioonidele, on autentne.Artikkel 3Käesolev otsus jõustub 1. novembril 1996 tingimusel, et kõik lepingu artikli 103 lõikes 1 ettenähtud teated on EMP Ühiskomiteele esitatud.Artikkel 4Käesolev otsus avaldatakse Euroopa Ühenduste Teataja EMP osas ja EMP kaasandes.Brüssel, 4. oktoober 1996EMP Ühiskomitee nimeleesistujaH. Hafstein[1] EÜT L 140, 13.6.1996, lk 45.[2] EÜT L 129, 14.6.1995, lk 23.--------------------------------------------------


text:
 24.2.2007
 ES
 Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea
 C 42/40
 Recurso interpuesto el 22 de diciembre de 2006 — SO.GE.L.M.A./AER
 (Asunto T-411/06)
 (2007/C 42/71)
 Lengua de procedimiento: italiano
 Partes
 Demandante: SO.GE.L.M.A. Srl (Scandicci, Italia) (representantes: E. Cappelli, P. De Caterini, A. Bandini y A. Gironi, abogados)
 Demandada: Agencia Europea para la Reconstrucción
 Pretensiones de la parte demandante
 —
 Que se anulen las decisiones de la AER de retirar la licitación para las labores de «Recuperación de la navegación libre (eliminación de la artillería sin explotar) en el sistema de transporte por las vías navegables interiores, República Serbia, Serbia y Montenegro» (referencia de publicación no Europe Aid/120694/D/W/YU, proyecto no 05SER01 04 01) y de convocar una nueva licitación, comunicadas por la AER mediante escritos de 9 de octubre de 2006, prot. D (06) DG/MIL/EP 2715 y de 14 de diciembre de 2006, prot. DG/mie/3313, así como todo acto que las fundamente o guarde relación o conexión con ellas, incluida la decisión de excluir a la demandante y, en cualquier caso, que se condene a la Agencia Europea para la Reconstrucción a indemnizar a la demandante por los perjuicios sufridos en la medida indicada en el escrito de demanda.
 —
 Que se condene en costas a la demandada.
 Motivos y principales alegaciones
 La finalidad de la licitación objeto del presente asunto era la adjudicación de un contrato de obras consistente en la identificación y retirada de los artefactos explosivos no detonados procedentes de bombardeos efectuados por la OTAN en 1999, con el fin de reabrir a la navegación interna las aguas del Danubio y del Sava.
 Una vez aceptada su oferta por haber sido considerada la más favorable, la demandante recibió una primera solicitud de información, que atendió en tiempo oportuno. En particular, ofreció justificaciones puntuales en relación con la presencia como líder del equipo de reconocimiento acuático de una persona altamente cualificada, pero cuya experiencia laboral era inferior a la exigida en el anuncio de licitación.
 Tras haber mantenido contactos profesionales con una empresa asesora de la Agencia Europea de Reconstrucción en el procedimiento de licitación en cuestión, que permitían esperar una respuesta positiva al contrato, la demandante fue informada posteriormente de la anulación del procedimiento de licitación debido a la falta de ofertas técnicamente idóneas y de que se pretendía proceder a convocar una nueva licitación.
 En apoyo de sus pretensiones, la demandante alega la infracción del artículo 41 de la Directiva 2004/18 del Parlamento Europeo y del Consejo, de 31 de marzo de 2004, sobre coordinación de los procedimientos de adjudicación de los contratos públicos de obras, de suministro y de servicios (1) y, con carácter más general, la vulneración de los principios que rigen la normativa comunitaria en materia de procedimientos de adjudicación de contratos públicos, en la medida en que, según la demandante, la anulación del procedimiento en cuestión es fruto de una elección no ponderada, efectuada sin que mediara una valoración en profundidad del interés público protegido. En segundo lugar, la demandante alega asimismo el incumplimiento del deber de motivación.
 (1) DO L 134, de 30.4.2004, p. 114.


text:
 22.7.2017
 BG
 Официален вестник на Европейския съюз
 L 191/9
 РЕШЕНИЕ No 2/2015 НА ПОДКОМИТЕТА ПО ТЪРГОВИЯ И УСТОЙЧИВО РАЗВИТИЕ ЕС — ГРУЗИЯ
 от 18 ноември 2015 година
 за съставяне на списък с експерти в областта на търговията и устойчивото развитие [2017/1366]
 ПОДКОМИТЕТЪТ ПО ТЪРГОВИЯ И УСТОЙЧИВО РАЗВИТИЕ ЕС — ГРУЗИЯ,
 като взе предвид Споразумението за асоцииране между Европейския съюз и Европейската общност за атомна енергия и техните държави членки, от една страна, и Грузия, от друга страна (1) (наричано по-долу „споразумението“), и по-специално член 243 от него,
 като има предвид, че:
 (1)
 В съответствие с член 431 от споразумението части от него се прилагат временно от 1 септември 2014 г.
 (2)
 В член 243, параграф 3 от споразумението се предвижда Подкомитетът по търговия и устойчиво развитие да състави списък от най-малко 15 лица, които желаят и могат да изпълняват функцията на експерти в процедурите на експертната комисия,
 ПРИЕ НАСТОЯЩОТО РЕШЕНИЕ:
 Член 1
 Утвърждава се фигуриращият в приложението списък с експерти в областта на търговията и устойчивото развитие за целите на член 243 от споразумението.
 Член 2
 Настоящото решение влиза в сила в деня на приемането му.
 Съставено в Тбилиси на 18 ноември 2015 година.
 Председател
 Lali GOGOBERIDZE
 Началник на департамент „Икономически анализ и политика“, Министерство на икономиката и устойчивото развитие на Грузия — председател, представляващ Грузия
 Секретари
 Irakli TSIKORIDZE
 Главен експерт в департамент „Външна търговия и международни икономически връзки“, Министерство на икономиката и устойчивото развитие на Грузия
 Daniel KRAMER
 Администратор, отговарящ по въпросите на политиката, в отдел D1 „Търговия и устойчиво развитие, обща система за преференции“, генерална дирекция „Търговия“, Европейска комисия
 (1) ОВ L 261, 30.8.2014 г., стр. 4.
 ПРИЛОЖЕНИЕ
 СПИСЪК С ЕКСПЕРТИ В ОБЛАСТТА НА ТЪРГОВИЯТА И УСТОЙЧИВОТО РАЗВИТИЕ
 I. Експерти, предложени от Грузия
 1.
 Nata STURUA
 2.
 David KIKODZE
 3.
 Marina SHVANGIRADZE
 4.
 Ilia OSEPASHVILI
 5.
 Roin MIGRIAULI
 II. Експерти, предложени от ЕС
 1.
 Eddy LAURIJSSEN
 2.
 Jorge CARDONA
 3.
 Karin LUKAS
 4.
 Hélène RUIZ FABRI
 5.
 Laurence BOISSON DE CHAZOURNES
 6.
 Geert VAN CALSTER
 III. Председатели
 1.
 Jill MURRAY (Австралия)
 2.
 Janice BELLACE (САЩ)
 3.
 Ross WILSON (Нова Зеландия)
 4.
 Arthur APPLETON (САЩ)
 5.
 Nathalie BERNASCONI (Швейцария)


text:
Benjamin Harrison (født 20. august 1833, død 13. marts 1901) var USA's 23. præsident, fra 1889 til 1893.
 Familie
 Benjamin Harrisons bedstefar var William Henry Harrison, USA's niende præsident. Benjamins far var John Scott Harrison, som var medlem af kongressen.
 Benjamin Harrison var gift med Caroline Scott Harrison. Hun var datter af en presbyteriansk prædikant.
 Udenrigspolitik
 Harrison byggede videre på Rutherford B. Hayes og Grover Clevelands ekspansionistiske eller imperialistiske politik overfor Latinamerika. Harrison sendte i 1890 amerikanske soldater til Argentina for at beskytte amerikanske interesser i Buenos Aires, og i 1891 var marinesoldater fra USA i kampe med nationalt orienteret oprørere i Chile. I 1891 sendte Harrison soldater ind for at slå et oprør ned blandt sorte arbejdere på øen Navassa som USA havde erklæret som deres territorium.
 Udnævnelser til Højesteret
 David J. Brewer, 1890
 Henry B. Brown, 1891
 George Shiras Jr, 1892
 Howell E. Jackson, 1893
 Eksterne henvisninger
 USA's præsidenter
 Personer fra Ohio