text:
King's Highway 62, commonly referred to as Highway 62, is a provincially maintained highway in the Canadian province of Ontario. The highway travels south–north from Highway 33 at Bloomfield in Prince Edward County, through Belleville, Madoc and Bancroft, to Maynooth, where it ends at a junction with Highway 127. Prior to 1997, the route continued north and east of Maynooth through Cobermere, Barry's Bay, Killaloe, Round Lake and Bonnechere to Highway 17 in Pembroke. This section of highway was redesignated Hastings Highlands Municipal Road62, Renfrew County Road62, and Renfrew County Road58.
 Highway62 was designated by the Department of Highways (DHO), predecessor to the modern Ministry of Transportation, in 1937 along the Madoc–Pembroke Road between those two communities. A gap existed along the route between Barry's Bay and Round Lake for several decades pending construction of a new road which never took place. The highway was extended south from Madoc to Highway 14 at Foxboro in 1966. Two years later, Highway 521 was renumbered as part of Highway62, and a concurrency established with Highway 60 between Barry's Bay and Killaloe, uniting the discontinuous sections. In the 1980s, it assumed the route of Highway 14 from Foxboro to Bloomfield, establishing the peak length of the highway at . The northernmost portion of the route was renumbered Highway 148 in 1982.
 Route description
 Highway62 begins in the community of Bloomfield at a junction with Highway33, the Loyalist Parkway, with which it shares a common terminus at Wellington Street. The first of the road north of that intersection is maintained under a Connecting Link agreement.
 Exiting Bloomfield, the highway winds north through several communities in Prince Edward County, including Huffs Corners where the Huff Estates Winery is located, Crofton, Mountain View and Fenwood Gardens before crossing the Norris Whitney Bridge over the Bay of Quinte into Belleville. It skirts the CFD Mountain View military base between Crofton and Mountain View.
 Within urbanized Belleville, Highway62 serves as the primary north–south route. It is maintained under a Connecting Link agreement from the northern end of the Norris Whitney Bridge to the southern end of the Highway 401 interchange. The Connecting Link follows Bay Bridge Road, Dundas Street, Pinnacle Street, and Front Street North.
 Prior to crossing the Moira River in downtown Belleville, Highway62 encounters what was, until 1997, the southern terminus of Highway 37 at Station Street.
 After crossing over Highway401 at the Exit543 interchange, Highway62 exits the urban portion of Belleville. It travels straight north until its path is interrupted by the Moira River approaching Foxboro; the highway bypasses to the west of that community along the boundary between Belleville and Quite West, meeting the southern terminus of former Highway14 at Doucette Road. The former route through Foxboro is known as Ashley Street. Continuing along the bypass, the highway merges onto the Madoc Road at Halloway. Entering the municipality of Centre Hastings approximately north of Halloway, it follows the route of the historic settlement road north to Highway7 at Madoc, passing through a mixture of farm fields and grasslands; the occasional forest interrupts the shorter vegetation, as well as the communities of West Huntingdon and Crookston.
 Within the village of Madoc, Highway62 is maintained under a Connecting Link agreement as it passes through the centre of town. The Connecting Link begins just north of Charles Street and extends to south of Highway7.
 Now following the Hastings Colonization Road, an early pioneer settlement road,
 the highway travels straight north into Madoc Township, passing through Eldorado, site of the first gold rush in Ontario.
 At Keller Bridge, the highway enters the Canadian Shield, with farmland giving way to thick forests and frequent rock outcroppings for the remainder of its length. The next of Highway62 bypasses the Hastings Colonization Road through the particularly barren townships of Tudor and Cashel and Limerick, with a combined population of under 1,000.
 Only the communities of Bannockburn and Millbridge break the endless forests.
 Entering the larger rural Town of Bancroft, Highway62 travels through the community of L'Amable and around the lake of the same name. It enters the village of Bancroft, where it is maintained as a Connecting Link as it meanders alongside the York River. The Connecting Link begins south of Bay Lake Road and stretches through the village to Victoria Drive.
 Within the centre of the village, Highway62 intersects and is briefly concurrent with Highway 28 along Bridge Street, crossing the York River. South of this concurrency, it is known as Mill Street, while north of the concurrency it is known as Hastings Street.
 Parting ways with the York River, Highway62 enters Hastings Highlands and passes through the communities of York River and Birds Creek, which form a continuous stretch of urban development along with the village of Bancroft. The highway then returns to thick forests, although the occasional farm dots the journey north, mostly surrounding the Hickey Settlement. At the Peterson Colonization Road, the highway makes a sharp curve east and enters Maynooth. It ends at the junction with Highway127, with which it shares a terminus. Prior to 1997, Highway62 continued east and north along what is now known as Hastings Highlands Municipal Road62, Renfrew County Road 62 and Renfrew County Road58 via Cobermere, Barry's Bay, Killaloe, Round Lake Centre and Bonnechere to Highway17 in Pembroke.
 History
 Highway62 was first assumed by the DHO in 1937. On April1 of that year, the DHO merged with the Department of Northern Development.
 Following the merger, many new trunk roads through central and northern Ontario were designated as provincial highways. One of these was the Madoc–Pembroke Road, which became Highway62 on August11, 1937.
 Originally, the route followed the Hastings Colonization Road, which was quickly determined to be too rough to upgrade. A new alignment was constructed to the east between Millbridge and L'Amable in the late 1930s. This bypass was opened to traffic on March22, 1939.
 Subsequently, the bypassed portion of the highway was decommissioned on April 11.
 At the time of its assumption, Highway62 was split into two segments. The first section travelled from Madoc to Barry's Bay, the second from Pembroke to the community of Bonnechere, on the northwestern shore of Round Lake. It was originally planned to unite these segments by building a new highway mostly following the route of Paugh Lake Road.
 This section was never built, and so the two sections of Highway62 remained separated for a quarter century.
 Several changes occurred in the Round Lake area through the 1950s and 1960s. In 1956, Highway521 was designated by the DHO between Brudenell and the northern segment of Highway62 at Bonnechere Provincial Park.
 Four years later, Highway62 was extended concurrently along Highway60 between Barry's Bay and Killaloe and north along Highway 521 to Tramore on the southeast side of Round Lake.
 The remainder of Highway521, between Tramore and Bonnechere Provincial Park, was renumbered Highway62 in 1967, reuniting the two sections of the route.
 Within Pembroke, Highway62 inititally ended at the intersection of Trafalgar Road and Pembroke Street West.
 The completion of the Des Allumettes Bridge southeast of Pembroke, in 1957, resulted in the extension of Highway62 to the Quebec boundary in 1960, almost entirely a concurrency with Highway17.
 In 1966, Highway62 was extended south of Madoc to Highway14 at Foxboro when several Hastings County roads were taken over by the DHO on April1 of that year.
 The Norris Whitney Bridge over the Bay of Quinte was opened in December 1982, replacing the original 1891 swing bridge. Portions of the original causeway can still be seen alongside the current structure.
 Shortly thereafter, by 1984, the section of Highway14 south of Foxboro to Highway33 at Bloomfield was renumbered as part of Highway62.
 Discussions have been underway since 2017 to build a second bridge, widening the highway from two to four lanes.
 As part of a series of budget cuts initiated by premier Mike Harris under his Common Sense Revolution platform in 1995, numerous highways deemed to no longer be of significance to the provincial network were decommissioned and responsibility for the routes transferred to a lower level of government, a process referred to as downloading. Portions of Highway62 were consequently transferred to local jurisdictions in 1997 and 1998. On April1, 1997, the section from the Laurentian Valley – Killaloe, Hagarty and Richards boundary east to Highway17 was transferred to Renfrew County.
 Renfrew quickly redesignated it as County Road58.
 On January1, 1998, the section northeast of Highway127 in Maynooth was transferred to Hastings and Renfrew counties. The concurrency with Highway60 was discontinued as a result of this transfer.
 Hastings County subsequently transferred its portion of the road to the townships of Monteagle and Bangor, Wicklow and McClure on April15, 1998.
 Major intersections
 References
 Notes
 Sources
 External links
 Highway 62 - Length and Route
 Highway 62 Pictures and Information
 Preliminary Design and Environmental Assessment Study for Highway 62 Norris Whitney Bridge Rehabilitation / Replacement
 062
 Transport in Belleville, Ontario


type: contracts

jurisdiction: EU

text:
 18.10.2013
 EL
 Επίσημη Εφημερίδα της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης
 L 277/14
 ΑΠΌΦΑΣΗ αριθ. 1/2013 ΤΗΣ ΜΕΙΚΤΉΣ ΕΠΙΤΡΟΠΉΣ ΕΕ-ΕΖΕΣ ΓΙΑ ΤΟ ΚΟΙΝΌ ΚΑΘΕΣΤΏΣ ΔΙΑΜΕΤΑΚΌΜΙΣΗΣ
 της 1ης Ιουλίου 2013
 για την τροποποίηση της σύμβασης της 20ής Μαΐου 1987 περί κοινού καθεστώτος διαμετακόμισης
 (2013/510/ΕΕ)
 Η ΜΕΙΚΤΗ ΕΠΙΤΡΟΠΗ ΕΕ-ΕΖΕΣ,
 Έχοντας υπόψη τη σύμβαση της 20ής Μαΐου 1987 περί κοινού καθεστώτος διαμετακόμισης (1), και ιδίως το άρθρο 15 παράγραφος 3 στοιχείο α),
 Εκτιμώντας τα ακόλουθα:
 (1)
 Η Κροατία προσχώρησε στην Ένωση την 1η Ιουλίου 2013.
 (2)
 Ως εκ τούτου, οι αποδόσεις στην κροατική γλώσσα των γλωσσικών αναφορών που χρησιμοποιούνται στη σύμβαση της 20ής Μαΐου 1987 περί κοινού καθεστώτος διαμετακόμισης («σύμβαση») θα πρέπει να απαλειφθούν από το μέρος που αφορά τις χώρες της ΕΖΕΣ και να ενσωματωθούν στα μέρη που αφορούν τα κράτη μέλη της Ένωσης.
 (3)
 Είναι αναγκαία η εισαγωγή τεχνικών τροποποιήσεων στη σύμβαση όσον αφορά τα έντυπα εγγύησης που παρατίθενται στο προσάρτημα III, οι οποίες απορρέουν από την προσχώρηση της Κροατίας στην Ένωση.
 (4)
 Για να επιτραπεί η χρησιμοποίηση των εντύπων εγγύησης τα οποία έχουν τυπωθεί σύμφωνα με τα κριτήρια που ίσχυαν πριν από την ημερομηνία προσχώρησης της Κροατίας στην Ένωση, θα πρέπει να καθοριστεί μεταβατική περίοδος κατά την οποία θα επιτρέπεται η χρήση των εν λόγω εντύπων, με ορισμένες προσαρμογές.
 (5)
 Επομένως η σύμβαση θα πρέπει να τροποποιηθεί αναλόγως,
 ΕΞΕΔΩΣΕ ΤΗΝ ΠΑΡΟΥΣΑ ΑΠΟΦΑΣΗ,
 Άρθρο 1
 Το προσάρτημα III της σύμβασης περί κοινού καθεστώτος διαμετακόμισης τροποποιείται σύμφωνα με το παράρτημα της παρούσας απόφασης.
 Άρθρο 2
 Τα έντυπα που βασίζονται στα υποδείγματα τα οποία παρατίθενται στα παραρτήματα Γ1, Γ2, Γ3, Γ4, Γ5 και Γ6 του προσαρτήματος III της σύμβασης μπορούν να εξακολουθήσουν να χρησιμοποιούνται, με την επιφύλαξη των αναγκαίων γεωγραφικών προσαρμογών, το αργότερο μέχρι το τέλος του δωδέκατου μήνα που έπεται της ημερομηνίας έναρξης της ισχύος της παρούσας απόφασης.
 Άρθρο 3
 Η παρούσα απόφαση αρχίζει να ισχύει την ημερομηνία της έκδοσής της.
 Ρέικιαβικ, 1 Ιουλίου 2013.
 Για τη Μεικτή Επιτροπή
 Ο Πρόεδρος
 Snorri OLSEN
 (1) ΕΕ L 226 της 13.8.1987, σ. 2.
 ΠΑΡΑΡΤΗΜΑ
 1.
 Στο προσάρτημα III παράρτημα B1, το κείμενο που αφορά τη θέση 51 αντικαθίσταται από το ακόλουθο κείμενο:
 «Θέση 51: Προβλεπόμενα τελωνεία διέλευσης
 Κωδικοί χωρών
 Ο κωδικός της χώρας αποτελείται από τον κωδικό ISO άλφα - 2 της χώρας (ISO 3166-1).
 Ο κατάλογος των κωδικών που εφαρμόζονται έχει ως εξής:
 AT
 Αυστρία
 BE
 Βέλγιο
 BG
 Βουλγαρία
 CH
 Ελβετία
 CY
 Κύπρος
 CZ
 Τσεχική Δημοκρατία
 DE
 Γερμανία
 DK
 Δανία
 EE
 Εσθονία
 ES
 Ισπανία
 FI
 Φινλανδία
 FR
 Γαλλία
 GB
 Ηνωμένο Βασίλειο
 GR
 Ελλάδα
 HR
 Κροατία
 HU
 Ουγγαρία
 IE
 Ιρλανδία
 IS
 Ισλανδία
 IT
 Ιταλία
 LT
 Λιθουανία
 LU
 Λουξεμβούργο
 LV
 Λετονία
 MT
 Μάλτα
 NL
 Κάτω Χώρες
 NO
 Νορβηγία
 PL
 Πολωνία
 PT
 Πορτογαλία
 RO
 Ρουμανία
 SE
 Σουηδία
 SI
 Σλοβενία
 SK
 Σλοβακία
 TR
 Τουρκία».
 2.
 Στο προσάρτημα III παράρτημα Β6, ο τίτλος III τροποποιείται ως εξής:
 α)
 Στον πίνακα των γλωσσικών αναφορών «Περιορισμένη ισχύς — 99200», παρεμβάλλεται η ακόλουθη περίπτωση μεταξύ των γλωσσικών αναφορών FR και IT και απαλείφεται από τη σημερινή της θέση:
 «—
 HR
 Valjanost ograničena».
 β)
 Στον πίνακα των γλωσσικών αναφορών «Απαλλαγή — 99201», παρεμβάλλεται η ακόλουθη περίπτωση μεταξύ των γλωσσικών αναφορών FR και IT και απαλείφεται από τη σημερινή της θέση:
 «—
 HR
 Oslobođeno».
 γ)
 Στον πίνακα των γλωσσικών αναφορών «Εναλλακτική απόδειξη — 99202», παρεμβάλλεται η ακόλουθη περίπτωση μεταξύ των γλωσσικών αναφορών FR και IT και απαλείφεται από τη σημερινή της θέση:
 «—
 HR
 Alternativni dokaz».
 δ)
 Στον πίνακα των γλωσσικών αναφορών «Διαφορές: εμπορεύματα προσκομισθέντα στο τελωνείο ...(ονομασία και χώρα) — 99203», παρεμβάλλεται η ακόλουθη περίπτωση μεταξύ των γλωσσικών αναφορών FR και IT και απαλείφεται από τη σημερινή της θέση:
 «—
 HR
 Razlike:Carinarnica kojoj je roba podnesena ......(naziv i zemlja)».
 ε)
 Στον πίνακα των γλωσσικών αναφορών «Η έξοδος από ... υποβάλλεται σε περιορισμούς ή σε επιβαρύνσεις σύμφωνα με τον κανονισμό/την οδηγία/την απόφαση αριθ. ... — 99204», παρεμβάλλεται η ακόλουθη περίπτωση μεταξύ των γλωσσικών αναφορών FR και IT και απαλείφεται από τη σημερινή της θέση:
 «—
 HR
 Izlaz iz........ podliježe ograničenjima ili pristojbama temeljem Uredbe/Direktive/Odluke br...».
 στ)
 Στον πίνακα των γλωσσικών αναφορών «Απαλλαγή από την υποχρέωση τήρησης υποχρεωτικής διαδρομής — 99205», παρεμβάλλεται η ακόλουθη περίπτωση μεταξύ των γλωσσικών αναφορών FR και IT και απαλείφεται από τη σημερινή της θέση:
 «—
 HR
 Oslobođeno od propisanog plana puta».
 ζ)
 Στον πίνακα των γλωσσικών αναφορών «Εγκεκριμένος αποστολέας — 99206», παρεμβάλλεται η ακόλουθη περίπτωση μεταξύ των γλωσσικών αναφορών FR και IT και απαλείφεται από τη σημερινή της θέση:
 «—
 HR
 Ovlašteni pošiljatelj».
 η)
 Στον πίνακα των γλωσσικών αναφορών «Δεν απαιτείται υπογραφή — 99207», παρεμβάλλεται η ακόλουθη περίπτωση μεταξύ των γλωσσικών αναφορών FR και IT και απαλείφεται από τη σημερινή της θέση:
 «—
 HR
 Oslobođeno potpisa».
 θ)
 Στον πίνακα των γλωσσικών αναφορών «ΑΠΑΓΟΡΕΥΕΤΑΙ Η ΣΥΣΤΑΣΗ ΣΥΝΟΛΙΚΗΣ ΕΓΓΥΗΣΗΣ — 99208», παρεμβάλλεται η ακόλουθη περίπτωση μεταξύ των γλωσσικών αναφορών FR και IT και απαλείφεται από τη σημερινή της θέση:
 «—
 HR
 Zabranjeno zajedničko jamstvo».
 ι)
 Στον πίνακα των γλωσσικών αναφορών «ΑΠΕΡΙΟΡΙΣΤΗ ΧΡΗΣΗ — 99209», παρεμβάλλεται η ακόλουθη περίπτωση μεταξύ των γλωσσικών αναφορών FR και IT και απαλείφεται από τη σημερινή της θέση:
 «—
 HR
 Neograničena uporaba».
 ια)
 Στον πίνακα των γλωσσικών αναφορών «Εκδοθέν εκ των υστέρων — 99210», παρεμβάλλεται η ακόλουθη περίπτωση μεταξύ των γλωσσικών αναφορών FR και IT και απαλείφεται από τη σημερινή της θέση:
 «—
 HR
 Izdano naknadno».
 ιβ)
 Στον πίνακα των γλωσσικών αναφορών «Διάφορα — 99211», παρεμβάλλεται η ακόλουθη περίπτωση μεταξύ των γλωσσικών αναφορών FR και IT και απαλείφεται από τη σημερινή της θέση:
 «—
 HR
 Razni».
 ιγ)
 Στον πίνακα των γλωσσικών αναφορών «Χύμα — 99212», παρεμβάλλεται η ακόλουθη περίπτωση μεταξύ των γλωσσικών αναφορών FR και IT και απαλείφεται από τη σημερινή της θέση:
 «—
 HR
 Rasuto».
 ιδ)
 Στον πίνακα των γλωσσικών αναφορών «Αποστολέας — 99213», παρεμβάλλεται η ακόλουθη περίπτωση μεταξύ των γλωσσικών αναφορών FR και IT και απαλείφεται από τη σημερινή της θέση:
 «—
 HR
 Pošiljatelj».
 3.
 Στο προσάρτημα III παράρτημα Γ1 σημείο Ι παράγραφος 1, οι λέξεις «τη Δημοκρατία της Κροατίας» παρεμβάλλονται μεταξύ των λέξεων «τη Γαλλική Δημοκρατία» και «την Ιταλική Δημοκρατία». Οι λέξεις «της Δημοκρατίας της Κροατίας», μεταξύ της λέξης «και» και των λέξεων «της Δημοκρατίας της Ισλανδίας», απαλείφονται.
 4.
 Στο προσάρτημα III παράρτημα Γ2 σημείο Ι παράγραφος 1, οι λέξεις «τη Δημοκρατία της Κροατίας» παρεμβάλλονται μεταξύ των λέξεων «τη Γαλλική Δημοκρατία» και «την Ιταλική Δημοκρατία». Οι λέξεις «της Δημοκρατίας της Κροατίας», μεταξύ της λέξης «και» και των λέξεων «της Δημοκρατίας της Ισλανδίας», απαλείφονται.
 5.
 Στο προσάρτημα III παράρτημα Γ4 σημείο Ι παράγραφος 1, οι λέξεις «τη Δημοκρατία της Κροατίας» παρεμβάλλονται μεταξύ των λέξεων «τη Γαλλική Δημοκρατία» και «την Ιταλική Δημοκρατία». Οι λέξεις «της Δημοκρατίας της Κροατίας», μεταξύ της λέξης «και» και των λέξεων «της Δημοκρατίας της Ισλανδίας», απαλείφονται.
 6.
 Στο προσάρτημα III παράρτημα Γ5 θέση 7, η λέξη «Κροατία» μεταξύ των λέξεων «Ευρωπαϊκή Κοινότητα» και «Ισλανδία» απαλείφεται.
 7.
 Στο προσάρτημα III παράρτημα Γ6 θέση 6, η λέξη «Κροατία» μεταξύ των λέξεων «Ευρωπαϊκή Κοινότητα» και «Ισλανδία» απαλείφεται.


text:
 28.11.2013
 PT
 Jornal Oficial da União Europeia
 L 318/3
 DECISÃO DO COMITÉ MISTO DO EEE
 N.o 103/2013
 de 14 de junho de 2013
 que altera o anexo I (Questões veterinárias e fitossanitárias) do Acordo EEE
 O COMITÉ MISTO DO EEE,
 Tendo em conta o Acordo sobre o Espaço Económico Europeu, a seguir designado por «Acordo EEE», nomeadamente o artigo 98.o,
 Considerando o seguinte:
 (1)
 O Regulamento (UE) n.o 1064/2012 da Comissão, de 13 de novembro de 2012, que altera o anexo X do Regulamento (CE) n.o 999/2001 do Parlamento Europeu e do Conselho no que se refere à lista de testes rápidos (1), deve ser incorporado no Acordo EEE.
 (2)
 O Regulamento (UE) n.o 1190/2012 da Comissão, de 12 de dezembro de 2012, relativo ao objetivo da União de redução de Salmonella Enteritidis e Salmonella Typhimurium em bandos de perus, tal como previsto no Regulamento (CE) n.o 2160/2003 do Parlamento Europeu e do Conselho (2), deve ser incorporado no Acordo EEE.
 (3)
 A Decisão de Execução 2012/762/UE da Comissão, de 6 de dezembro de 2012, que altera a Decisão 2009/821/CE no que se refere às listas de postos de inspeção fronteiriços e de unidades veterinárias no sistema Traces (3), deve ser incorporada no Acordo EEE.
 (4)
 A Decisão de Execução 2012/786/UE da Comissão, de 13 de dezembro de 2012, que altera a Decisão 2010/221/UE no que respeita às medidas nacionais destinadas a impedir a introdução de certas doenças dos animais aquáticos em partes da Irlanda, da Finlândia e da Suécia (4), deve ser incorporada no Acordo EEE.
 (5)
 O Regulamento (UE) n.o 1190/2012 revoga o Regulamento (CE) n.o 584/2008 da Comissão (5) que está incorporado no Acordo EEE e que deve, por conseguinte, ser dele suprimido.
 (6)
 A presente decisão refere-se a legislação relativa a questões veterinárias. A legislação relativa a questões veterinárias não é aplicável ao Liechtenstein enquanto a aplicação do Acordo entre a Comunidade Europeia e a Confederação Helvética relativo ao comércio de produtos agrícolas for extensiva ao Liechtenstein, tal como especificado nas adaptações setoriais do anexo I do Acordo EEE. Por conseguinte, a presente decisão não é aplicável ao Liechtenstein.
 (7)
 O anexo I do Acordo EEE deve, por conseguinte, ser alterado em conformidade,
 ADOTOU A PRESENTE DECISÃO:
 Artigo 1.o
 O capítulo I do anexo I do Acordo EEE é alterado do seguinte modo:
 1)
 Na Parte 1.2, ao ponto 39 (Decisão 2009/821/CE da Comissão) é aditado o seguinte travessão:
 «—
 32012 D 0762: Decisão de Execução 2012/762/UE da Comissão, de 6 de dezembro de 2012 (JO L 336 de 8.12.2012, p. 94).».
 2)
 Na Parte 4.2, ao ponto 94 (Decisão 2010/221/UE da Comissão) é aditado o seguinte travessão:
 «—
 32012 D 0786: Decisão de Execução 2012/786/UE da Comissão, de 13 de dezembro de 2012 (JO L 347 de 15.12.2012, p. 36).».
 3)
 Na Parte 7.1, ao ponto 12 [Regulamento (CE) n.o 999/2001 do Parlamento Europeu e do Conselho] é aditado o seguinte travessão:
 «—
 32012 R 1064: Regulamento (UE) n.o 1064/2012 da Comissão, de 13 de novembro de 2012 (JO L 314 de 14.11.2012, p. 13).».
 4)
 O texto do ponto 51 [Regulamento (CE) n.o 584/2008 da Comissão] é substituído pelo seguinte:
 «32012 R 1190: Regulamento (UE) n.o 1190/2012 da Comissão, de 12 de dezembro de 2012, relativo ao objetivo da União de redução de Salmonella Enteritidis e Salmonella Typhimurium em bandos de perus, tal como previsto no Regulamento (CE) n.o 2160/2003 do Parlamento Europeu e do Conselho (JO L 340 de 13.12.2012, p. 29).».
 Artigo 2.o
 Fazem fé os textos dos Regulamentos (CE) n.o 1064/2012 e (UE) n.o 1190/2012 e das Decisões de Execução 2012/762/UE e 2012/786/UE nas línguas islandesa e norueguesa, que serão publicados no Suplemento EEE do Jornal Oficial da União Europeia.
 Artigo 3.o
 A presente decisão entra em vigor em 15 de junho de 2013, desde que tenham sido efetuadas todas as notificações previstas no artigo 103.o, n.o 1, do Acordo EEE (6).
 Artigo 4.o
 A presente decisão é publicada na Secção EEE e no Suplemento EEE do Jornal Oficial da União Europeia.
 Feito em Bruxelas, em 14 de junho de 2013.
 Pelo Comité Misto do EEE
 O Presidente
 Gianluca GRIPPA
 (1) JO L 314 de 14.11.2012, p. 13.
 (2) JO L 340 de 13.12.2012, p. 29.
 (3) JO L 336 de 8.12.2012, p. 94.
 (4) JO L 347 de 15.12.2012, p. 36.
 (5) JO L 162 de 21.6.2008, p. 3.
 (6) Não foram indicados requisitos constitucionais.


type: caselaw

text:
 2.12.2006
 PT
 Jornal Oficial da União Europeia
 C 294/62
 Recurso interposto em 4 de Outubro de 2006 — República Italiana/Comissão
 (Processo T-280/06)
 (2006/C 294/123)
 Língua do processo: italiano
 Partes
 Recorrente: República Italiana (representante: P. Gentili, Avvocato dello Stato)
 Recorrida: Comissão das Comunidades Europeias
 Pedidos da recorrente
 —
 anulação da nota de 24.07.2006, n.o 06626, da Comissão Europeia, Direcção-Geral da Política Regional — Programas e projectos em Chipre, na Grécia, Hungria, Itália, Malta e Países Baixos — que tem por objecto pagamentos da Comissão diferentes do montante pedido. Ref. Programa POR Sicília (N.o CCI 1999 IT 61 PO 011);
 —
 anulação de todos os actos conexos e prévios e consequente condenação da Comissão das Comunidades Europeias nas despesas.
 Fundamentos e principais argumentos
 Os fundamentos e principais argumentos são idênticos aos invocados no processo T-345/04 República Italiana/Comissão. (1)
 (1) JO C 262, de 23.10.04, p. 55.


text:
 Pomembno pravno obvestilo
 |
 21998D1008(01)
 Uradni list L 272 , 08/10/1998 str. 0001 - 0002
 Sklep Skupnega odbora EGPšt. 1/98z dne 30. januarja 1998o spremembi Priloge IX (Finančne storitve) in Priloge XIX (Varstvo potrošnikov) k Sporazumu EGPSKUPNI ODBOR EGP JE -ob upoštevanju Sporazuma o Evropskem gospodarskem prostoru, kakor ga spreminja Protokol o prilagoditvi Sporazuma o Evropskem gospodarskem prostoru, v nadaljnjem besedilu "Sporazum", in zlasti člena 98 Sporazuma,ker je bila Priloga IX k Sporazumu spremenjena s Sklepom Skupnega odbora EGP št. 53/96 [1];ker je bila Priloga XIX k Sporazumu spremenjena s Sklepom Skupnega odbora EGP št. 34/96 [2];ker je Direktivo 97/5/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 27. januarja 1997 o čezmejnih nakazilih [3] treba vključiti v Sporazum,ker se Direktiva 97/5/ES uporablja tudi za čezmejna nakazila v valutah Lihtenštajna, Islandije in Norveške;ker je treba Direktivo 97/5/ES vključiti v Prilogo IX in jo navesti v Prilogi XIX k Sporazumu le v vednost -SKLENIL:Člen 1Za točko 16 (Direktiva Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 95/26/ES) Priloge IX k Sporazumu se doda naslednja točka:"16a. 397 L 0005: Direktiva 97/5/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 27. januarja 1997 o čezmejnih nakazilih (UL L 43, 14.2.1997, str. 25).Za namene tega sporazuma veljajo določbe direktive z naslednjimi prilagoditvami:(a) v členu 1 se besede "valute držav članic" nadomesti z besedami "valute držav članic in članic EFTE";(b) Člen 2(c) se nadomesti z naslednjim:"finančna institucija" pomeni:- kreditne institucije, kakor so opredeljene v prvi alinei člena 1 Direktive 77/780/ES,- zavarovalnice, kakor so opredeljene v členu 1(a) Direktive 92/49/ES,- življenjske zavarovalnice, kakor so opredeljene v členu 1(a) Direktive 92/96/ES,- kolektivne naložbene podjeme za vlaganja v prenosljive vrednostne papirje (KNPVP), kakor so opredeljeni v členu 1(2) Direktive 85/611/EGS,- investicijska podjetja, kakor so opredeljena v členu 1(2) Direktive 93/22/EGS,- druga podjetja, katerih dejavnosti so podobne dejavnosti podjetij iz prejšnje alinee ali katerih glavna dejavnost je pridobivanje imetja finančnega premoženja ali preoblikovanje finančnih terjatev."Člen 2Za točko 7b (Direktiva 94/47/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta) v Prilogi XIX k Sporazumu se vstavi naslednje:"7c. 397 L 0005: Direktiva 97/5/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [4] z dne 27. januarja 1997 o čezmejnih nakazilih (UL L 43, 14.2.1997, str. 25)."Člen 3Besedili Direktive 97/5/ES v islandskem in norveškem jeziku, ki sta priloženi ustreznim jezikovnim različicam tega sklepa, sta verodostojni.Člen 4Ta sklep začne veljati 1. februarja 1998 pod pogojem, da so bila Skupnemu odboru EGP predložena vsa uradna obvestila v skladu s členom 103(1) Sporazuma.Člen 5Ta sklep se objavi v sklopu EGP in v Dopolnilu EGP Uradnega lista Evropskih skupnosti.V Bruslju, 30. januarja 1998Za Skupni odbor EGPPredsednikF. Barbaso[1] UL L 21, 23.1.1997, str. 8.[2] UL L 237, 19.9.1996, str. 41.[3] UL L 43, 14.2.1997, str. 25.[4] Navedeno le v vednost. Za uporabo glej Prilogo IX.--------------------------------------------------


text:
 8.11.2008
 CS
 Úřední věstník Evropské unie
 C 285/41
 Usnesení předsedy Soudu prvního stupně ze dne 10. září 2008 – Serviço Intermunicipalizado de Gestão de Resíduos do Grande Porto (Lipor) v. Komise
 (Věc T-26/07) (1)
 („Žaloba na neplatnost - Fond soudržnosti - Nařízení (ES) č. 1164/94 - Snížení finanční podpory - Neexistence bezprostředního dotčení - Nepřípustnost“)
 (2008/C 285/76)
 Jednací jazyk: portugalština
 Účastníci řízení
 Žalobce: Serviço Intermunicipalizado de Gestão de Resíduos do Grande Porto (Lipor) (Baguim do Monte, Portugalsko) (zástupci: P. Moura Pinheiro, M. Gorjão Henriques a F. Quintela, advokáti)
 Žalovaná: Komise Evropských společenství (zástupci: P. Guerra e Andrade a A. Weimar, zmocněnci)
 Předmět věci
 Návrh na zrušení rozhodnutí Komise K(2006) 5008 ze dne 17. října 2006, kterým se snižuje finanční podpora poskytnutá Fondem soudržnosti na některé projekty týkající se spalovny městského odpadu z domácnosti v regionu Porto
 Výrok
 1)
 Žaloba se odmítá jako nepřípustná.
 2)
 Serviço Intermunicipalizado de Gestão de Resíduos do Grande Porto(Lipor) ponese vlastní náklady řízení, jakož i náklady vynaložené Komisí.
 (1) Úř. věst. C 82, 17.4.2007.


type: legislation

text:
 Svarīgs juridisks paziņojums
 |
 52007PC0020
 Priekšlikums Padomes regula ar ko groza Regulu (EK) Nr. 147/2003 par dažiem ierobežojošiem pasākumiem attiecībā uz Somāliju
 [pic] | EIROPAS KOPIENU KOMISIJA |Briselē, 31.1.2007COM(2007)20 galīgā redakcijaPriekšlikumsPADOMES REGULAar ko groza Regulu (EK) Nr. 147/2003 par dažiem ierobežojošiem pasākumiem attiecībā uz Somāliju(iesniegusi Komisija)PASKAIDROJUMA RAKSTS(1) 2002. gada 10. decembra Kopējā nostāja 2002/960/KĀDP paredz ieroču un ar tiem saistīto visa veida materiālu piegādes vai pārdošanas embargo Somālijai, tostarp aizliegumu sniegt tehnisku un finansiālu palīdzību, kas saistīta ar militāro darbību Somālijā. Aizliegumu sniegt tehnisku un finansiālu palīdzību saistībā ar militāro darbību īsteno ar Padomes 2003. gada 27. janvāra Regulu (EK) Nr. 147/2003.(2) Ņemot vērā Starpvaldību attīstības iestādes (SAI) priekšlikumu izveidot aizsardzības un mācības misiju Somālijā ( IGASOM ), Apvienoto Nāciju Organizācijas Drošības padome 2006. gada 6. decembrī nolēma izdarīt atkāpi no iepriekš minētajiem pasākumiem attiecībā uz ieroču un militārā aprīkojuma un tehnisko konsultāciju un palīdzības sniegšanu, ja šie pasākumi paredzēti vienīgi misijas atbalstam vai tās vajadzībām, kā noteikts ANODP Rezolūcijas 1725 (2006) 3. pantā.(3) Atkāpi, kas attiecas uz tehniskās un finansiālās palīdzības aizliegumu, īsteno, izdarot grozījumus Padomes Regulā (EK) Nr. 147/2003.PriekšlikumsPADOMES REGULAar ko groza Regulu (EK) Nr. 147/2003 par dažiem ierobežojošiem pasākumiem attiecībā uz SomālijuEIROPAS SAVIENĪBAS PADOME,ņemot vērā Eiropas Kopienas dibināšanas līgumu un jo īpaši tā 60. un 301. pantu,ņemot vērā Padomes Kopējo nostāju 2007/.../KĀDP, ar ko groza Kopējo nostāju 2002/960/KĀDP par ieroču, munīcijas un militārā aprīkojuma embargo piemērošanu Somālijai[1],ņemot vērā Komisijas priekšlikumu,tā kā:1. Kopējā nostāja 2002/960/KĀDP aizliedz ieroču, munīcijas un militārā aprīkojuma piegādi Somālijai un aizliedz tehnisku konsultāciju, finanšu un cita veida palīdzības un ar militāro darbību saistītas izglītības sniegšanu Somālijā. Aizliegumu sniegt tehnisku un finansiālu palīdzību saistībā ar militāru darbību īstenoja ar Padomes 2003. gada 27. janvāra Regulu (EK) Nr. 147/2003 par dažiem ierobežojošiem pasākumiem attiecībā uz Somāliju[2].2. Apvienoto Nāciju Organizācijas Drošības padome 2006. gada 6. decembrī pieņēma Rezolūciju 1725 (2006) (še turpmāk „ANODP Rezolūcija 1725 (2006)”), inter alia pievienojot atkāpi no šiem ierobežojošiem pasākumiem attiecībā uz ieroču un militārā aprīkojuma piegādi un tehnisko konsultāciju un palīdzības sniegšanu, kas paredzēta vienīgi misijas atbalstam vai tās vajadzībām, kā noteikts ANODP Rezolūcijas 1725 (2006) 3. pantā.3. Ar Kopējo nostāju 2007/..../KĀDP groza Kopējo nostāju 2002/960/KĀDP, lai atkāpes no ierobežojošajiem pasākumiem saskaņotu ar ANODP Rezolūciju 1725 (2006). Attiecīgi jāgroza Regula (EK) Nr. 147/2003,IR PIEŅĒMUSI ŠO REGULU.1. pantsRegulu (EK) Nr. 147/2003 groza šādi.4. Šādu 4. punktu iekļauj 3. pantā:„4. Atkāpjoties no 1. panta, pielikumā minētā kompetentā iestāde dalībvalstī, kurā pakalpojumu sniedzējs ir reģistrēts, var atļaut sniegt finansējumu un finansiālo palīdzību, kas ir saistīta ar militārām darbībām, ja minētā palīdzība ir paredzēta vienīgi misijas atbalstam vai tās vajadzībām, kā noteikts ANODP Rezolūcijas 1725 (2006) 3. pantā.”5. Iekļauj šādu 3.a pantu:„3.a pantsKomisija groza pielikumu, pamatojoties uz dalībvalstu sniegto informāciju.”6. Šās regulas pielikuma tekstu pievieno kā pielikumu.2. pantsŠī regula stājas spēkā nākamajā dienā pēc tās publicēšanas Eiropas Savienības Oficiālajā Vēstnesī .Šī regula uzliek saistības kopumā un ir tieši piemērojama visās dalībvalstīs.Briselē [...]Padomes vārdā —priekšsēdētājsPIELIKUMS"PIELIKUMSRegulas 3.a pantā minēto kompetento iestāžu saraksts(aizpilda dalībvalstis)BEĻĢIJABULGĀRIJAČEHIJAS REPUBLIKADĀNIJAVĀCIJAIGAUNIJAGRIEĶIJASPĀNIJAFRANCIJAĪRIJAITĀLIJAKIPRALATVIJALIETUVALUKSEMBURGAUNGĀRIJAMALTANĪDERLANDEAUSTRIJAPOLIJAPORTUGĀLERUMĀNIJASLOVĒNIJASLOVĀKIJASOMIJAZVIEDRIJAAPVIENOTĀ KARALISTEEIROPAS KOPIENAEuropean CommissionDG External RelationsDirectorate A. Crisis Platform and Policy Coordination in CFSPUnit A2. Crisis Management and Conflict PreventionCHAR 12/106B-1049 Bruxelles/Brussel (Belgium)E-pasts: relex-sanctions@ec.europa.euTālr.: (322) 295 55 85, 299 11 76Fakss: (32 2) 299 08 73”[1] OV L....,...,2007., .... lpp.[2] OV L 24, 29.1.2003., 2. lpp.


text:
 22.11.2018
 BG
 Официален вестник на Европейския съюз
 L 297/47
 РЕШЕНИЕ НА СЪВМЕСТНИЯ КОМИТЕТ НА ЕИП
 No 36/2017
 от 3 февруари 2017 година
 за изменение на приложение XIII (Транспорт) към Споразумението за ЕИП [2018/1770]
 СЪВМЕСТНИЯТ КОМИТЕТ НА ЕИП,
 като взе предвид Споразумението за Европейското икономическо пространство („Споразумението за ЕИП“), и по-специално член 98 от него,
 като има предвид, че:
 (1)
 Регламент (ЕС) 2016/912 на Комисията от 9 юни 2016 г. за поправка на Регламент (ЕС) No 1303/2014 на Комисията относно техническата спецификация за оперативна съвместимост по отношение на „безопасността в железопътните тунели“ на железопътната система на Европейския съюз (1) следва да бъде включен в Споразумението за ЕИП.
 (2)
 Поради това приложение XIII към Споразумението за ЕИП следва да бъде съответно изменено,
 ПРИЕ НАСТОЯЩОТО РЕШЕНИЕ:
 Член 1
 В точка 37гба (Регламент (ЕС) No 1303/2014 на Комисията) от приложение XIII към Споразумението за ЕИП се добавя следното:
 „, изменен със:
 —
 32016 R 0912: Регламент (ЕС) 2016/912 на Комисията от 9 юни 2016 г. (ОВ L 153, 10.6.2016 г., стр. 28).“
 Член 2
 Текстовете на Регламент (ЕС) 2016/912 на исландски и норвежки език, които ще бъдат публикувани в притурката за ЕИП към Официален вестник на Европейския съюз, са автентични.
 Член 3
 Настоящото решение влиза в сила на 4 февруари 2017 г., при условие че са внесени всички нотификации, предвидени в член 103, параграф 1 от Споразумението за ЕИП (*1).
 Член 4
 Настоящото решение се публикува в раздела за ЕИП и в притурката за ЕИП към Официален вестник на Европейския съюз.
 Съставено в Брюксел на 3 февруари 2017 година.
 За Съвместния комитет на ЕИП
 Председател
 Claude MAERTEN
 (1) ОВ L 153, 10.6.2016 г., стр. 28.
 (*1) Без отбелязани конституционни изисквания.


jurisdiction: US

text:
 116 S237 IS: Promoting Access to Diabetic Shoes Act
 U.S. Senate
 2019-01-28
 text/xml
 EN
 Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.
 II116th CONGRESS1st SessionS. 237IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATESJanuary 28, 2019Mr. Brown (for himself and Ms. Collins) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on FinanceA BILLTo amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to permit nurse practitioners and physician
 assistants to satisfy the documentation requirement under the Medicare
 program for coverage of certain shoes for individuals with diabetes.
 1.Short titleThis Act may be cited as the Promoting Access to Diabetic Shoes Act. 2.Permitting nurse practitioners and physician assistants to satisfy Medicare documentation requirement for coverage of certain shoes for individuals with diabetesSection 1861(s)(12) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395x(s)(12)) is amended—
 (1)in subparagraph (A), by inserting , nurse practitioner, or physician assistant after physician; and (2)in subparagraph (C), by inserting , nurse practitioner, or physician assistant after each occurrence of physician.


type: other

text:
EUR-Lex - 52012DC0429 - MT
 RAPPORT TAL-KUMMISSJONI dwar l-applikazzjoni fl-2011 tar-Regolament (KE) Nru 1049/2001 dwar l-aċċess pubbliku għal dokumenti tal-Parlament Ewropew, tal-Kunsill u tal-Kummissjoni /* COM/2012/0429 final */
 dwar l-applikazzjoni fl-2011 tar-Regolament (KE) Nru 1049/2001 dwar l-aċċess pubbliku għal dokumenti tal-Parlament Ewropew, tal-Kunsill u tal-Kummissjoni
 Dan ir-rapport, imfassal skont l-Artikolu 17(1) tar-Regolament (KE) Nru 1049/2001 dwar l-aċċess pubbliku għal dokumenti tal-Parlament Ewropew, tal-Kunsill u tal-Kummissjoni[1], ikopri s-sena 2011 u hu bbażat fuq dejta statistika miġbura fil-qosor fl-Anness.
 Dawn l-istatistiki jirriflettu n-numru ta’ applikazzjonijiet u mhux ta' dokumenti mitluba. Fil-prattika, l-applikazzjonijiet jistgħu jkopru dokument wieħed waħdu jew fajls sħaħ dwar xi proċedura speċifika. L-applikazzjonijiet għal aċċess tad-dokumenti li kienu pubblikament aċċessibbli fil-mument tat-talba mhumiex inklużi.
 1. Reviżjoni tar-Regolament (KE) Nru 1049/2001
 1.1. Żewġ proposti differenti għar-reviżjoni tar-Regolament 1049/2001 mressqa mill-Kummissjoni Ewropea għadhom suġġetti għal riflessjoni interistituzzjonali. L-ewwel proposta għal riformulazzjoni tar-Regolament, ippreżentata mill-Kummissjoni fit-30 ta' April 2008, tintroduċi serje ta' emendi sostanzjali, li jiċċaraw l-interpretazzjoni tar-Regolament 1049/2001. It-tieni proposta tressqet mill-Kummissjoni fil-21 ta' Marzu 2011 bil-ħsieb li tadatta r-Regolament 1049/2001 għar-rekwiżiti formali tat-Trattat ta' Lisbona billi testendi l-kamp ta' applikazzjoni istituzzjonali tar-Regolament għall-istituzzjonijiet, korpi, uffiċċji u aġenziji kollha tal-Unjoni Ewropea, b'xi restrizzjonijiet rigward il-Qorti Ewropea tal-Ġustizzja, il-Bank Ċentrali Ewropew u l-Bank Ewropew tal-Investiment.
 1.2. Il-Parlament Ewropew adotta l-pożizzjoni tiegħu rigward iż-żewġ proposti fl-ewwel qari fil-15 ta' Diċembru 2011 li tipproponi 63 emenda. Il-Presidenza Daniża tal-Kunsill kienet qed tikkunsidra għażliet varji sabiex il-proċess leġiżlattiv jitmexxa 'l quddiem bil-ħsieb li jintlaħaq ftehim bejn il-Parlament Ewropew, il-Kunsill u l-Kummissjoni.
 2.1. Matul is-sena 2011, 19,956 dokument ġdid ġew miżjuda fir-reġistru tad-dokumenti tal-Kummissjoni (ara t-tabella fl-Anness).
 2.2. Skont l-Artikolu 17(1) tar-Regolament 1049/2001 il-Kummissjoni għandha tipprovdi fir-rapporti annwali tagħha n-numru ta’ dokumenti fil-pussess tagħha li jkunu “sensittivi” skont it-tifsira tal-Artikolu 9(1) tar-Regolament[2] u li għalhekk ma jkunux ġew irreġistrati. Ir-reġistru pubbliku tal-Kummissjoni kopra d-dokumenti COM, C, ĠU, PV u serje SEC sal-aħħar tal-2011. Fl-2011 l-ebda dokument sensittiv ma nħoloq jew wasal għand il-Kummissjoni, li jaqa' fi ħdan waħda minn dawn il-kategoriji ta' dokumenti.
 2.3. It-tabella hawn taħt turi l-istatistika għall-2011 dwar il-konsultazzjoni tas-sit “Trasparenza u Aċċess għad-Dokumenti” fuq EUROPA.
 || Numru ta’viżitaturi || Numru ta’sessjonijiet || Paġni meqjusa
 Medja kull xahar || 3,451 || 3,849 || 35,453
 3. Kooperazzjoni mal-istituzzjonijiet l-oħra soġġetti għar-Regolament
 Il-kumitat interistituzzjonali mwaqqaf skont l-Art. 15(2) tar-Regolament ma tlaqqax matul l-2011. It-tliet istituzzjonijiet (il-Parlament Ewropew, il-Kunsill u l-Kummissjoni) żammew kuntatti regolari fuq livell amministrattiv bil-ħsieb li jiżguraw applikazzjoni konsistenti tar-Regolament.
 4. Analiżi tal-Applikazzjonijiet Għall-Aċċess
 4.1. Fl-2011, il-fluss ta' talbiet għall-aċċess fl-istadju inizjali baqa' pjuttost stabbli b’żieda żgħira ħafna fin-numru ta’ applikazzjonijiet (6447 fl-2011 meta mqabbla ma' 6361 fl-2010) u saħansitra tnaqqis iżgħar fl-għadd ta’ tweġibiet fuq il-bażi tar-Regolament 1049/2001 (6055 fl-2011 meta mqabbla ma' 6127 fl-2010).
 4.2. Fir-rigward tal-istadju konfermattiv, in-numru tal-applikazzjonijiet li waslu naqsu bi kważi 9 % (165 applikazzjoni ġdida konfermatorja fl-2011 kontra l-181 fl-2010). L-għadd totali ta' tweġibiet għal applikazzjonijiet konfermatorji kien jikkorrispondi mill-qrib man-numru ta’ applikazzjonijiet li waslu (162 każ magħluqa fl-2011 meta mqabbla ma' 150 fl-2010). Fost dawk, 144 tweġiba (89 %) kienu d-deċiżjonijiet konfermattivi dwar l-aċċess għad-dokumenti skont ir-Regolament 1049/2001. L-għadd tagħhom żdied fl-2011 bi 18 % meta mqabbel mal-2010 fejn inħarġu 122 deċiżjoni bħal dawn.
 4.3. Fl-2011, id-DĠ għat-Tassazzjoni u l-Unjoni Doganali rċieva l-ogħla numru ta’ talbiet inizjali (7,80 %), segwit mill-qrib ħafna mid-DĠ Kompetizzjoni b'6,99 % tal-applikazzjonijiet inizjali, u d-DĠ Saħħa u Ħarsien tal-Konsumatur, b'6,96 %. Ta' min jinnota ż-żieda fl-interess fis-setturi li reċentement ġew riorganizzati fejn erba’ Direttorati-Ġenerali ġodda ħadu post it-tnejn li kienu jeżistu qabel: id-Direttorati Ġenerali Mobilità u Trasport flimkien ma' dak tal-Enerġija (li qabel kien jissejjaħ id-DĠ Trasport u Enerġija) kif ukoll id-Direttorati-Ġenerali Ambjent flimkien ma' dak dwar l-Azzjoni dwar il-Klima (li qabel kien jissejjaħ id-DĠ Ambjent).
 Għalkemm ir-relazzjonijiet esterni tal-UE saru kompetenza tas-Servizz Ewropew il-ġdid għall-Azzjoni Esterna, fl-2011 dan kien għadu mhux rifless fl-istatistika tal-Kummissjoni, peress li r-reġistri tagħha komplew ikopru l-biċċa l-kbira tat-talbiet rispettivi skont ir-Regolament 1049/2001.
 4.4. Id-dinja akkademika ippruvat għal darb'oħra li hija l-aktar kategorija attiva mill-applikanti, meta kienet responsabbli għal 25,73 % tal-applikazzjonijiet inizjali. Bħal fis-snin preċedenti ġiet segwita minn ditti legali bi 11,30 % u s-soċjetà ċivili (NGOs, gruppi ta' interess) b'8,59 % tal-għadd totali tal-applikazzjonijiet. Il-profil soċjoprofessjonali mhuwiex iddefinit fil-każ ta’ 34,78 % tal-applikazzjonijiet.
 4.5. It-tqassim ġeografiku tal-applikazzjonijiet inizjali wkoll baqa' simili għal snin preċedenti b’żieda żgħira fir-rigward tal-proporzjon tal-applikazzjonijiet ġejjin mill-Belġju li dejjem ikun l-akbar wieħed (21,42 %). Kważi l-istess numru ta' applikazzjonijiet oriġina mill-Italja u mill-Ġermanja (12,37 % u 12,27 % rispettivament). L-ebda wieħed mill-Istati Membri l-oħra, ma qabeż l-10 % tal-applikazzjonijiet, bl-akbar għadd ġej mill-Istati Membri li għandhom popolazzjoni kbira, jiġifieri Franza, Spanja, ir-Renju Unit, il-Pajjiżi l-Baxxi u l-Polonja. Il-proporzjon tal-applikazzjonijiet mit-12-il Stat Membru l-"ġdid" għadu ftit 'l isfel mill-proporzjon korrispondenti li joriġina mill-Istati Membri l-“qodma ”.
 5.1. Fl-2011, il-proporzjon tal-applikazzjonijiet li kienu totalment rifjutati fl-ewwel istanza baqa' kważi identiku mas-sena preċedenti (12,17 % fl-2011 kontra 12,47 % fl-2010). F'erbgħa minn kull ħames każijiet (80,20 % kontra 82,16 % fl-2010) ingħata żvelar sħiħ filwaqt li żdied ftit il-persentaġġ ta' dokumenti parzjalment żvelati meta mqabbel mas-snin preċedenti biex laħaq is-7,63 % (meta mqabbel ma' 5,37 % fl-2010).
 5.2. L-għadd ta’ każijiet fejn, wara applikazzjoni konfermatorja, il-Kummissjoni qalbet il-pożizzjoni meħuda mis-servizzi tagħha billi żvelat kompletament dokumenti li qabel kienu miċħuda, baqa' pjuttost stabbli (14,58 % kontra 15,57 % fl-2010). Madankollu, kien hemm inqas każijiet fejn ir-rifjut kien kompletament ikkonfermat u għadd notevolment akbar ta' każijiet fejn ingħata aċċess usa’ wara applikazzjoni konfermatorja.
 5.3. Għalkemm il-protezzjoni tal-proċess tat-teħid tad-deċiżjonijiet tal-Kummissjoni (l-Artikolu 4(3)) tammonta għal persentaġġ kemm kemm imnaqqas ta' raġunijiet ta' rifjut meta mqabbel mas-sena ta' qabel (25,73 % kontra 26,42 % fl-2010), tiġi l-ewwel fil-lista ta' l-aktar eċċezzjonijiet li jiġu invokati spiss, u tiżboq l-eċċezzjoni tal-protezzjoni tal-iskop tal-ispezzjonijiet, investigazzjonijiet u verifiki (it-tielet inċiż tal-Artikolu 4(2)), li s-sena li għaddiet naqset bi kważi 5 % sabiex laħqet il-21,90 % tal-każijiet (kontra 26,63 % fl-2010).
 5.4. It-tendenza li qed tizdied għandha tiġi nnutata f'dak li jirrigwarda l-protezzjoni tal-interessi kummerċjali (16,83 % kontra 11,84 % fl-2010) u l-ħarsien tar-relazzjonijiet internazzjonali (12,02 % kontra 9,83 % fl-2010).
 5.5. L-aktar raġuni invokata ta' spiss għall-konferma tar-rifjut għall-aċċess kienet, bħal fi snin preċedenti, il-protezzjoni tal-iskop tal-investigazzjonijiet (32,68 % meta mqabbla ma' 32 % fl-2010).
 – Il-protezzjoni tal-proċess tat-teħid tad-deċiżjonijiet tal-Kummissjoni, kienet invokata f'19,33 % tal-każijiet (eżattament l-istess bħal fl-2010) iżda dan in-numru huwa riżultat akkumulat ta' żieda rigward il-każijiet fejn il-proċess tat-teħid tad-deċiżjonijiet kien għaddej (15,33 % kontra 11,33 % fis-sena preċedenti) u t-tnaqqis parallel ta’ każijiet dwar opinjonijiet għall-użu intern, fejn id-deċiżjoni kienet diġà ttieħdet (4 % meta mqabbel ma' 8 % fl-2010).
 – Żieda importanti għandha tiġi nnutata rigward il-protezzjoni tal-privatezza u l-integrità tal-individwi (20,67 % kontra 9,33 % fl-2010). Min-naħa l-oħra, il-protezzjoni tal-interessi kummerċjali kienet invokata ftit inqas spiss milli fis-snin preċedenti (14,10 % meta mqabbla ma' 16,67 % fl-2010), u bl-eċċezzjoni tal-protezzjoni tal-proċedimenti fil-qrati u l-pariri legali kienet saħansitra aktar minn hekk (1,33 % kontra 10 % fis-sena preċedenti).
 6. Ilmenti lill-Ombudsman Ewropew
 6.1. Fl-2011 l-Ombudsman għalaq dawn is-17-il ilment kontra l-mod kif il-Kummissjoni ttrattat it-talbiet ta’ aċċess għal dokumenti:
 Każ wieħed (1) magħluq mingħajr ma nstabet xi forma ta’ amministrazzjoni ħażina
 8 każijiet magħluqa b’rimarka kritika u/jew ulterjuri
 8 każijiet magħluqa mingħajr ma ttieħedet azzjoni oħra
 6.2. Matul is-sena l-Ombudsman fetaħ 10 inkjesti ġodda fejn l-aċċess għad-dokumenti kien jew il-parti prinċipali jew dik sussidjarja tal-ilment. Dan hu konsiderevolment inqas milli fl-2010, meta nfetħu 22 investigazzjoni.
 7. Reviżjoni ġudizzjarja
 Bħal fis-snin preċedenti, ġiet deċiża każistika sinjifikanti ġdida fl-2011[3].
 7.1. Il-Qorti tal-Ġustizzja qatgħet sentenza importanti fuq l-appell fil-każ My Travel[4]. Il-Qorti saħħet l-oneru tal-prova għall-invokar tal-eċċezzjonijiet immirati lejn il-protezzjoni tal-proċess tat-teħid tad-deċiżjonijiet u l-pariri legali fir-rigward ta' dokumenti interni relatati ma' materji mhux leġiżlattivi, fejn tkun diġà ġiet adottata deċiżjoni.
 7.2. Fir-rigward tal-Qorti Ġenerali, din qatgħet 6 sentenzi marbuta mad-dritt tal-aċċess għal dokumenti:
 T-362/08 IFAW v il-Kummissjoni, sentenza tat-13.1.2011 || T-250/08, Batchelor v il-Kummissjoni, sentenza tal-24.5.2011 || Każijiet konġunti T-109/05 u T-444/05, Navigazione Libera del Golfo v il-Kummissjoni, sentenza tal-24.5.2011
 T-161/04, V. Jordana v il-Kummissjoni, sentenza tas-7.7.2011 || T-29/08 LPN v il-Kummissjoni, sentenza tad-9.9.2011 || T-437/08 CDC v il-Kummissjoni, sentenza tal-15.12.2011
 Fis-sentenzi Batchelor u IFAW II, il-Qorti pprovdiet kjarifiki importanti rigward il-valutazzjoni tal-oġġezzjonijiet tal-Istati Membri għall-iżvelar ta' dokumenti li joriġinaw minnhom iżda miżmuma mill-Kummissjoni.
 F'Navigazione Libera del Golfo, il-Qorti Ġenerali annullat id-deċiżjoni tal-Kummissjoni li ttieħdet qabel is-sentenza l-Isvezja v il-Kummissjoni (IFAW I) tal-Qorti tal-Ġustizzja u fejn l-oġġezzjoni ta' Stat Membru kienet invokata mingħajr motivazzjoni ulterjuri biex ma tiżvelax dokument li joriġina minn dak l-Istat Membru.
 Fis-sentenza tagħha mogħtija fil-każ Jordana, il-Qorti ċċarat li l-Artikolu 4(1)(b) tar-Regolament hija dispożizzjoni indiviżibbli li tirrikjedi li kwalunkwe imminar tal-privatezza jew l-integrità tal-individwu għandu dejjem jiġi eżaminat u vvalutat f'konformità mal-leġiżlazzjoni tal-UE rigward il-protezzjoni tad-dejta personali, partikolarment mar-Regolament 45/2001.
 Fil-każ LPN, il-Qorti kkonfermat l-eżistenza ta' preżunzjoni ġenerali li l-iżvelar ta' dokumenti fil-proċedimenti ta' ksur fil-prinċipju jdgħajjef il-protezzjoni tal-għan tal-attivitajiet ta' investigazzjoni, sakemm dawn il-proċedimenti għadhom għaddejjin.
 Fl-aħħar, fis-sentenza tas-CDC, il-Qorti ddeċidiet li l-protezzjoni tal-iskop tal-investigazzjonijiet ma setgħetx tiġi invokata biex jiġi rrifjutat l-aċċess għal lista ta’ dokumenti.
 Għandhom jissemmew tliet każijiet oħra li tneħħew mir-reġistru wara l-irtirar mill-applikant:
 T-88/11 BIA Separations v il-Kummissjoni || T-14/11 Timab Industries u CFPR v il-Kummissjoni || T-399/07, Basell Polyolefine v il-Kummissjoni
 7.3. Il-Qorti ddeċidiet li ma taġġudikax f'ħames każijiet u għalhekk ordnat it-tneħħija tagħhom mir-reġistru:
 T-411/09, Terezakis v il-Kummissjoni || T-291/10, A. Martin v il-Kummissjoni || T-395/10 Stichting Corporate Europe Observatory v il-Kummissjoni
 T-120/10 ClientEarth and Others v il-Kummissjoni || T-449/10 ClientEarth and Others v il-Kummissjoni ||
 7.4. Fl-2010 tressqu 15-il-każ ġdid kontra deċiżjonijiet tal-Kummissjoni taħt ir-Regolament (KE) Nru 1049/2001.
 T-603/11 Ecologistas en Acción-CODA v il-Kummissjoni || T-545/11 Stichting Greenpeace Nederland u PAN Europe v il-Kummissjoni || T-534/11 Schenker v il-Kummissjoni
 T-516/11 MasterCard and Others v il-Kummissjoni || T-480/11 Technion - Israel Institute of Technology u Technion Research & Development v il-Kummissjoni || T-362/11 Stichting Greenpeace Nederland u PAN Europe v il-Kummissjoni
 T-341/11 Ecologistas en Acción-CODA v il-Kummissjoni || T-330/11 MasterCard and Others v il-Kummissjoni || T-278/11 ClientEarth and Others v il-Kummissjoni
 Case T-211/11 Timab Industries u CFPR v il-Kummissjoni || T-111/11 ClientEarth v il-Kummissjoni || T-93/11 Stichting Corporate Europe Observatory v il-Kummissjoni
 T-14/11 Timab Industries u CFPR v il-Kummissjoni || T-88/11 BIA Separations v il-Kummissjoni || T-447/11 Catinis v il-Kummissjoni
 7.5. Barra minn dan, tliet appelli ġodda tressqu quddiem il-Qorti tal-Ġustizzja kontra ordni/sentenza tal-Qorti Ġenerali.
 C-208/11P Internationaler Hilfsfonds v il-Kummissjoni || C-554/11 P Internationaler Hilfsfonds v il-Kummissjoni || Każ C-135/11 P IFAW Internationaler Tierschutz-Fonds v il-Kummissjoni
 Wara disa' snin ta' żieda kontinwa, in-numru ta' talbiet għall-aċċess imressqa quddiem il-Kummissjoni baqa' fl-istess livell fl-2010 u l-2011. Bi kważi 6500 talba fis-sena, il-Kummissjoni ttrattat dak li bil-bosta kien l-akbar numru ta' talbiet għall-aċċess tal-istituzzjonijiet u l-korpi kollha tal-Unjoni Ewropea.
 Din l-istabbilizzazzjoni tal-volum tat-talbiet hija possibbilment indikazzjoni li d-dritt tal-aċċess għad-dokumenti laħaq livell sinifikanti ta' rikonoxximent pubbliku fost iċ-ċittadini Ewropej, is-soċjetà ċivili u l-operaturi ekonomiċi. Fl-ispirtu tat-Trattat ta' Lisbona, tali kuxjenza twitti t-triq għal żieda tad-dibattitu pubbliku u l-parteċipazzjoni tagħhom aktar mill-qrib fit-tfassil tal-politiki Ewropej.
 Min-naħa l-oħra, il-ħtieġa li jagħmlu talbiet għal aċċess għad-dokumenti tonqos hekk kif il-Kummissjoni gradwalment iżżid l-iżvelar proattiv ta' dokumenti u informazzjoni permezz ta’ reġistri pubbliċi u websajts.
 Trasparenza attiva b'mod ġenerali ntlaħqet fir-rigward tal-attività leġiżlattiva. Ammont sinjifikanti ta' talbiet għall-aċċess u kważi l-applikazzjonijiet konfermatorji kollha jikkonċernaw l-attivitajiet tal-Kummissjoni fil-qasam tal-monitoraġġ tal-applikazzjoni tal-liġi tal-UE. Dawn it-talbiet għandhom ikunu indirizzati b’mod parallel mal-investigazzjonijiet ikkonċernati. F'każijiet bħal dawn il-Kummissjoni trid issib il-bilanċ ġust bejn l-iżgurar tat-trasparenza tal-attivitajiet tagħha u l-protezzjoni ta' drittijiet oħra li huma garantiti bil-liġi u mill-każistika tal-Qrati Ewropej.
 Statistika dwar l-applikazzjoni tar-Regolament (KE) Nru 1049/2001
 1. L-għadd ta’ dokumenti mniżżla fir-reġistru
 || COM || C || ĠU || PV || SEC || Totali
 It-talbiet inizjali
 2. L-applikazzjonijiet irċevuti u pproċessati
 Applikazzjonijiet irċevuti || 5401 || 6361 || 6477
 Tweġibiet mogħtija[5] [6]. || 6636 || 7148 || 7075
 Tweġibiet mogħtija abbażi tar-Regolament 1049/2001 || 5055 || 6127 || 6055
 3. Riżultat
 Nru || % || Nru || % || Nru || %
 Aċċess mogħt || 4258 || 84.23 || 5034 || 82.16 || 4856 || 80.20
 Aċċess miċħud || 589 || 11.65 || 764 || 12.47 || 737 || 12.18
 Aċċess parzjali || 208 || 4.11 || 329 || 5.37 || 462 || 7.62
 totali || 5055 || 100 || 6127 || 100 || 6055 || 100
 Talbiet ta’ konferma
 4. L-applikazzjonijiet irċevuti u pproċessati
 Applikazzjonijiet irċevuti || 140 || 181 || 165
 Tweġibiet għal applikazzjonijiet || 134 || 152 || 162
 Deċiżjonijiet dwar applikazzjonijiet konfermatorji abbażi tar-Regolament 1049/2001 || 120 || 122 || 144
 5. Riżultat
 Konferma || 27 || 22.50 || 61 || 50 || 61 || 42.36
 Reviżjoni parzjali || 33 || 27.50 || 42 || 34.43 || 62 || 43.05
 Reviżjoni sħiħa || 60 || 50 || 19 || 15.57 || 21 || 14.58
 totali || 120 || 100 || 122 || 100 || 144 || 100
 (1) Id-distribuzzjoni tar-rifjuti skont l-eċċezzjoni applikata (%)
 6. It-talbiet inizjali
 4.1.a. l-1el inċiż – Protezzjoni tas-sigurtà pubblika || 1.36 || 1.94 || 2.40
 4.1.a. it-2i inċiż – Protezzjoni tad-difiża u l-kwistjonijiet militari || 0.54 || 0.14 || 0.39
 4.1.a. it-3et inċiż – Protezzjoni ta’ relazzjonijiet internazzjonali || 8.17 || 9.83 || 12.02
 4.1.a. ir-4a' inċiż – Protezzjoni tal-politika finanzjarja, monetarja u ekonomika || 2.09 || 2.15 || 1.88
 4.1.b. Protezzjoni tal-privatezza u l-integrità tal-individwu || 6.99 || 9.76 || 8.90
 4.2.L-1 inċiż - Protezzjoni tal-interessi kummerċjali || 13.99 || 11.84 || 16.83
 4.2 It-2 inċiż - Protezzjoni tal-proċedimenti fil-qrati u pariri legali || 9.81 || 7.32 || 6.76
 4.2 It-3 inċiż - Protezzjoni għall-iskop ta’ spezzjonijiet, investigazzjoni u verifiki || 27.61 || 26.63 || 21.90
 4.3 subparagrafu 1 - Proċess ta’ teħid ta’deċiżjonijiet, għadha ma ttieħdet l-ebda deċiżjoni || 17.80 || 16.80 || 17.15
 4.3. subparagrafu 2- Proċess ta’ teħid ta’ deċiżjonijiet, deċiżjoni li diġà ttieħdet: opinjonijiet għall-użu intern bħala parti mid-deliberazzjonijiet u l-konsultazzjonijiet preliminari || 7.81 || 9.62 || 8.58
 4.5. Rifjut mill-Istat Membru/it-tielet l-awtur || 3.81 || 3.94 || 3.18
 totali || 100 || 100 || 100
 7. Talbiet ta’ konferma
 4.1.a. l-1el inċiż – Protezzjoni tas-sigurtà pubblika || 2.55 || 2,67 || 1.33
 4.1.a. it-2i inċiż – Protezzjoni tad-difiża u l-kwistjonijiet militari || 0 || 0 || 2.00
 4.1.a. . it-3et inċiż – Protezzjoni ta’ relazzjonijiet internazzjonali || 4.38 || 6,67 || 4.67
 4.1.a. ir-4a' inċiż – Protezzjoni tal-politika finanzjarja, monetarja u ekonomika || 3.28 || 3,33 || 3.34
 4.1.b. - Protezzjoni tal-privatezza u l-integrità tal-individwu || 14.23 || 9,33 || 20.67
 4.2. L-1 inċiż - Protezzjoni tal-interessi kummerċjali || 17.52 || 16.67 || 14.66
 4.2. It-2 inċiż - Protezzjoni tal-proċedimenti fil-qrati u pariri legali || 5.47 || 10 || 1.33
 4.2. It-3 inċiż - Protezzjoni għall-iskop ta’ spezzjonijiet, invesitgazzjonijiet u verifiki || 25.91 || 32 || 32.68
 4.3 subparagrafu 1 - Proċess ta’ teħid ta’deċiżjonijiet, għadha ma ttieħdet l-ebda deċiżjoni || 12.77 || 11,33 || 15.33
 4.3 subparagrafu 2- Proċess ta’ teħid ta’ deċiżjonijiet, deċiżjoni li diġà ttieħdet: opinjonijiet għall-użu intern bħala parti mid-deliberazzjonijiet u l-konsultazzjonijiet preliminari || 13.87 || 8 || 4.00
 4.5. Rifjut tal-Istat Membru || - || - || -
 Analiżi tat-talbiet
 8. Skont il-profil soċjali u professjonali tal-applikanti (%)
 Akkademiċi || 21.29 || 23.24 || 25.73
 Avukati || 10.24 || 10.69 || 11.30
 Is-soċjetà ċivili (gruppi ta’ interess, industrija, NGOs eċċ.) || 9.85 || 8.18 || 8.59
 Awtoritajiet pubbliċi (minbarra l-istituzzjonijiet tal-UE) || 7.33 || 13.56 || 8.20
 Istituzzjonijiet oħra tal-UE || 3.77 || 8.32 || 8.15
 Ġurnalisti || 2.02 || 3.35 || 3.25
 Mhux speċifikati || 45.5 || 32.68 || 34.78
 9. Skont l-oriġini ġeografika (%)
 Il-Belġju || 18.26 || 17.95 || 21.42
 L-Italja || 7.18 || 8.85 || 12.37
 Il-Ġermanja || 16.61 || 16.62 || 12.27
 Franza || 8.01 || 9.05 || 8.90
 Ir-Renju Unit || 6.23 || 7.24 || 8.59
 Spanja || 6.27 || 6.86 || 7.16
 L-Olanda || 5.45 || 4.43 || 4.18
 Il-Polonja || 2.86 || 2.76 || 2.68
 Il-Lussemburgu || 1.71 || 1.99 || 2.12
 Id-Danimarka || 1.63 || 2.02 || 2.11
 L-Isvezja || 2.13 || 2.18 || 1.81
 Il-Finlandja || 0.78 || 0.81 || 1.57
 L-Awstrija || 1.98 || 2.08 || 1.38
 Il-Portugall || 1.61 || 1.16 || 1.15
 Il-Greċja || 1.06 || 1.22 || 1.10
 L-Irlanda || 0.72 || 1.49 || 1.02
 L-Ungerija || 0.70 || 0.89 || 0.96
 Ir-Repubblika Ċeka || 1.11 || 4.23 || 0.93
 Il-Bulgarija || 0.56 || 0.69 || 0.93
 Ir-Rumanija || 0.93 || 1.11 || 0.87
 Is-Slovakkja || 0.50 || 0.56 || 0.56
 Il-Litwanja || 0.35 || 0.31 || 0.42
 Is-Slovenja || 0.39 || 0.52 || 0.31
 Ċipru || 0.20 || 0.20 || 0.25
 L-Estonja || 0.17 || 0.09 || 0.19
 Il-Latvja || 0.06 || 0.13 || 0.15
 Pajjiżi Ewropej li mhumiex fl-UE || 0.83 || 0.50 || 0.40
 L-Amerika ta’ Fuq || 0.37 || 0.11 || 0.23
 L-Awstralja u New Zealand || 0.07 || 0.09 || 0.03
 L-Afrika || 0.20 || 0.05 || 0.02
 L-Amerika t’Isfel || 0.09 || 0.05 || 0.02
 L-Asja || 0.19 || 0.04 || 0.06
 Mhux speċifikati || 10.57 || 3.49 || 3.73
 10. Skont il-qasam ta’ interess (%)
 Direttorat Ġenerali/Servizz || 2009 || 2010 || 2011
 SG – Segretarjat Ġenerali || 10.10 || 11.64 || 10.12
 TAXUD – Tassazzjoni u Unjoni Doganali || 6.20 || 5.30 || 7.80
 COMP – Kompetizzjoni || 7.03 || 9.07 || 6.99
 SANCO – Saħħa u Konsumaturi || 4.69 || 5.44 || 6.96
 ENV – Ambjent [7] || 8.37 || 4.86 || 6.37
 ENER – Enerġija || - || 2.91 || 5.86
 MARKT – Suq intern u servizzi || 7.27 || 6.14 || 5.72
 ENTR – Intrapriża u Industrija || 4.55 || 4.48 || 4.84
 HOME - Affarijiet Interni || - || 1.63 || 4.74
 TRADE – Kummerċ || 2.08 || 3.06 || 3.47
 DEVCO – Żvilupp u Kooperazzjoni-EuropeAid (li kienu DEV + AIDCO) || 2.75 || 2.77 || 3.30
 MOVE – Mobilità u Trasport || - || 3.13 || 3.02
 SJ – Servizz Legali || 1.80 || 2.68 || 2.76
 AGRI – Agrikoltura u Żvilupp Rurali || 4.07 || 3.15 || 2.62
 JUST - Ġustizzja (li qabel kien JLS)[8] || 7.74 || 6.75 || 2.54
 RELEX – Relazzjonijiet Esterni[9] || 2.25 || 3.29 || 2.39
 HR - Riżorsi Umani u Sigurtà + OIB + OIL - l-Uffiċji għall-Infrastruttura u l-Loġistika fi Brussell u l-Lussemburgu + PMO - Uffiċċju għall-Amministrazzjoni u Ħlas ta’ Drittijiet Individwali || 3.15 || 2.29 || 2.34
 REGIO – Politika reġjonali || 3.67 || 3.06 || 2.29
 CLIMA – Azzjoni Klimatika || - || 1.21 || 2.22
 INFSO - Soċjetà tal-Informazzjoni || 2.29 || 1.79 || 1.98
 EMPL – Impjiegi, Affarijiet Soċjali u Inklużjoni || 3.28 || 2.74 || 1.64
 ECFIN – Affarijiet Ekonomiċi u Finanzjarji || 1.87 || 2.32 || 1.57
 RTD - Riċerka u Innovazzjoni + ĊKR - Ċentru Konġunt tar-Riċerka || 1.74 || 1.82 || 1.27
 COMM – Servizz Komunikazzjoni || 0.41 || 0.74 || 1.26
 EAC – Edukazzjoni u kultura || 1.44 || 1.13 || 1.05
 ELARG – Tkabbir || 1.74 || 1.47 || 1.04
 BUDG – Baġit || 1.07 || 1.24 || 1.02
 MARE - Affarijiet Marittimi u Sajd || 0.79 || 0.66 || 0.95
 OP – Uffiċċju tal-Pubblikazzjonijiet || 0.19 || 0.19 || 0.37
 ECHO – Għajnuna Umanitarja u Protezzjoni Ċivili || 0.24 || 0.28 || 0.33
 OLAF – Uffiċċju Ewropew għall-Ġlieda kontra l-Frodi || 0.24 || 0.27 || 0.25
 DGT – Traduzzjoni || 0.13 || 0.36 || 0.14
 CAB – Kabinetti tal-Kummissarji || 0.30 || 0.28 || 0.11
 BEPA - Uffiċċju tal-Konsulenti tal-Politika Ewropea || 0.06 || 0.03 || 0.11
 DIGIT – Informatika || 0.07 || 0.09 || 0.09
 IAS – Servizz ta' Verifika interna || 0.02 || 0.09 || 0.05
 SCIC – Servizz Komuni tal-Interpretazzjoni || 0.02 || 0.08 || 0.00
 [1] ĠU L 145, 31.5.2001, p. 43
 [2] "Dokumenti li ġejjin mill-istituzzjonijiet jew mill-aġenziji mwaqqfa minnhom, mill-Istati Membri, pajjiżi terzi jew Organizzazzjonijiet Internazzjonali, klassifikati bħala "TRÉS SECRET/TOP SECRET", "SECRET" jew "CONFIDENTIEL" skont ir-regoli tal-istituzzjoni rilevanti, li jħarsu l-interessi essenzali tal-Unjoni Ewropea jew ta' wieħed jew aktar mill-Istati Membri tagħha fl-oqsma koperti mill-Artikolu 4(1)(a), partikolarment is-sigurtà pubblika, kwistjonijiet militari u tad-difiża” (l-Artikolu 9(1))
 [3] Għad-dettalji ta’ kull każ imsemmi hawn taħt, ara http://curia.europa.eu/jurisp/cgi-bin/form.pl?lang=en
 [4] Każ C-506/08 P l-Isvezja/MyTravel u l-Kummissjoni, tal-21/7/2011.
 [5] Jekk jogħġbok innota li talba waħda tista’ tkopri diversi dokumenti u konsegwentement tista’ twassal għal bosta tweġibiet differenti;
 [6] Jekk jogħġbok innota li l-kategorija "Tweġibiet mogħtija" tinkludi t-tweġbiet mogħtija 'l barra mill-ambitu tar-Regolament 10498/2001, pereżempju t-tweġibiet mogħtija skont ir-Regolament 45/2001.
 [8] Jekk jogħġbok innota li DĠ JLS inqasam f’DĠ JUST u DĠ HOME fl-2010;
 [9] Jekk jogħġbok innota li l-biċċa l-kbira tal-attività tad-DĠ RELEX ittieħdet mis-Servizz Ewropew għal Azzjoni Esterna mill-1 ta' Jannar 2011;
 [10] Jekk jogħġbok innota li DĠ TREN inqasam f’DĠ ENER u DĠ MOVE fl-2010;


text:
 10.6.2010
 RO
 Jurnalul Oficial al Uniunii Europene
 L 143/8
 DECIZIA NR. 19/2010 A COMITETULUI MIXT AL SEE
 din 12 martie 2010
 de modificare a anexei I (Chestiuni veterinare și fitosanitare) la Acordul privind SEE
 COMITETUL MIXT AL SEE,
 având în vedere Acordul privind Spațiul Economic European, astfel cum a fost modificat prin Protocolul de adaptare a Acordului privind Spațiul Economic European, denumit în continuare „acordul”, în special articolul 98,
 întrucât:
 (1)
 Anexa I la acord a fost modificată prin Decizia nr. 18/2010 a Comitetului mixt al SEE din 1 martie 2010 (1).
 (2)
 Regulamentul (CE) nr. 832/2007 al Comisiei din 16 iulie 2007 de modificare a Regulamentului (CE) nr. 197/2006 în ceea ce privește utilizarea alimentelor vechi și prelungirea valabilității măsurilor tranzitorii referitoare la aceste alimente (2) trebuie încorporat în acord.
 (3)
 Regulamentul (CE) nr. 829/2007 al Comisiei din 28 iunie 2007 de modificare a anexelor I, II, VII, VIII, X și XI la Regulamentul (CE) nr. 1774/2002 al Parlamentului European și al Consiliului în ceea ce privește introducerea pe piață a anumitor subproduse de origine animală (3) trebuie încorporat în acord.
 (4)
 Regulamentul (CE) nr. 1432/2007 al Comisiei din 5 decembrie 2007 de modificare a anexelor I, II și VI la Regulamentul (CE) nr. 1774/2002 al Parlamentului European și al Consiliului privind marcarea și transportul subproduselor de origine animală (4) trebuie încorporat în acord.
 (5)
 Regulamentul (CE) nr. 1576/2007 al Comisiei din 21 decembrie 2007 de modificare a Regulamentului (CE) nr. 92/2005 de aplicare a Regulamentului (CE) nr. 1774/2002 al Parlamentului European și al Consiliului privind modul de eliminare sau utilizare a subproduselor de origine animală (5) trebuie încorporat în acord.
 (6)
 Prezenta decizie nu se aplică Liechtensteinului.
 (7)
 Prezenta decizie se aplică Islandei în cadrul perioadei de tranziție specificată la punctul 2 din partea introductivă a capitolului I din anexa I în domeniile care nu se aplicau Islandei anterior revizuirii acestui capitol prin Decizia nr. 133/2007 a Comitetului mixt al SEE din 26 octombrie 2007 (6),
 DECIDE:
 Articolul 1
 Capitolul I din anexa I la acord se modifică după cum urmează:
 1.
 În partea 7.1 punctul 9b [Regulamentul (CE) nr. 1774/2002 al Parlamentului European și al Consiliului], se adaugă următoarele liniuțe:
 „—
 32007 R 0829: Regulamentul (CE) nr. 829/2007 al Comisiei din 28 iunie 2007 (JO L 191, 21.7.2007, p. 1);
 —
 32007 R 1432: Regulamentul (CE) nr. 1432/2007 al Comisiei din 5 decembrie 2007 (JO L 320, 6.12.2007, p. 13).”
 2.
 În partea 7.2 punctul 39 [Regulamentul (CE) nr. 92/2005 al Comisiei] se adaugă următoarea liniuță:
 „—
 32007 R 1576: Regulamentul (CE) nr. 1576/2007 al Comisiei din 21 decembrie 2007 (JO L 340, 22.12.2007, p. 89).”
 3.
 În partea 7.2, la punctul 45 [Regulamentul (CE) nr. 197/2006 al Comisiei] se adaugă următorul text:
 „ , astfel cum a fost modificat prin:
 —
 32007 R 0832: Regulamentul (CE) nr. 832/2007 al Comisiei din 16 iulie 2007 (JO L 185, 17.7.2007, p. 7).”
 Articolul 2
 Textele Regulamentelor (CE) nr. 832/2007, (CE) nr. 829/2007, (CE) nr. 1432/2007 și (CE) nr. 1576/2007 în limbile islandeză și norvegiană, care urmează să fie publicate în suplimentul SEE la Jurnalul Oficial al Uniunii Europene, sunt autentice.
 Articolul 3
 Prezenta decizie intră în vigoare la 13 martie 2010, cu condiția să se fi efectuat toate notificările prevăzute la articolul 103 alineatul (1) din acord către Comitetul mixt al SEE (7) sau la data intrării în vigoare a Deciziei nr. 135/2007 a Comitetului mixt al SEE din 26 octombrie 2007, dacă această dată este ulterioară.
 Articolul 4
 Prezenta decizie se publică în secțiunea SEE și în suplimentul SEE ale Jurnalului Oficial al Uniunii Europene.
 Adoptată la Bruxelles, 12 martie 2010.
 Pentru Comitetul mixt al SEE
 Președintele
 Alan SEATTER
 (1) A se vedea pagina 4 din prezentul Jurnal Oficial.
 (2) JO L 185, 17.7.2007, p. 7.
 (3) JO L 191, 21.7.2007, p. 1.
 (4) JO L 320, 6.12.2007, p. 13.
 (5) JO L 340, 22.12.2007, p. 89.
 (6) JO L 100, 10.4.2008, p. 27.
 (7) Nu au fost semnalate obligații constituționale.


text:
Allmänna villkor – Gika webbhotell
 Mail Linux server inställningar
 Mail inställningar (Linux): MAC
 Mail inställningar : iPhone iPad
 Mail inställningar (Linux): PC Windows mail
 Mail Windows server inställningar
 WebbMail Linux
 Kontrollpanelen Linux
 Kontrollpanelen Windows
 Privatpaket 1 år start
 PRO-paket 1 år start
 Om Gika
 Länkar inloggning
 Allmänna villkor, gäller för samtliga kunder och avtal.
 § 1.1 Dessa villkor reglerar förhållandet mellan kund/abonnent och Urbane Guerilla HB webbhotell och Internet Services Gika.se, nedan kallat GIKA.SE, med avseende på avtal och abonemangstjänster såsom webbhotell, domänregistrering och därtill hörande tilläggstjänster som GIKA.SE levererar från tid till annan.
 § 2 Webbabonnemang
 § 2.1 För klargörande av vilka tjänster som ingår i Webbabonnemanget hos GIKA.SE hänvisas abonnenten till separat orderbekräftelse/faktura.
 § 2.2 Alla order till GIKA.SE genererar ett kvitto eller faktura, GIKA.SE gör registrering av domän eller aktiverar beställd tjänst efter fullgod betalning. Kvittot på betalningen är inte ett bevis på att domännamn eller prefix är registrerad på abonnent. Bevis på att registrering är genomförd är att WHOIS anger abonnent eller att GIKA.SE i separat meddelande bekräftar att registrering är genomförd.
 § 2.3 Fri support på abonnemang under abonnemangstiden. Gratis support sker via e-post, telefon och information på GIKA.SEs hemsidor. Support begränsas till tjänstens funktionalitet.
 § 3.1 Beställningen är bindande fr o m beställningsdagen.
 § 3.2 Avtalet löper årsvis eller enligt annan överenskommelse med GIKA.SE.
 § 3.3 Abonnemanget kan sägas upp när som helst. Uppsägning skall ske skriftligen, undertecknad av kontohavaren eller firmatecknare, via brev eller fax, senast 30 dagar innan ny avtalsperiod påbörjas. Domänregistering måste manuellt förnyas via fullgod betalning.
 § 3.4 Återbetalning av erlagd abonnemangsavgift görs endast i de fall då uppsägningen grundas på förändringar i abonnemangsvillkor eller allvarliga driftsstörningar för vilka GIKA.SE ansvarar (mer än 5% nertid under en månad). Vid driftstörningar återbetalas avgift motsvarande störningens varaktighet och vid förändringar i abonnemangsvillkoren återbetalas hela det resterande beloppet. Det belopp som skall återbetalas grundar sig på abonnemangets längd och kostnad vilket GIKA.SE har rätten att avgöra.
 § 3.5 GIKA.SE äger rätten att säga upp avtalet om abonnenten har brutit mot någon av punkterna i avtalet. Uppsägningen sker skriftligen per brev,fax eller e-post. GIKA.SE äger också rätten att säga upp avtalet med abonnent, om GIKA.SE anser att deras hemsida är olämplig, oseriös, omoralisk, oetisk eller liknande av olika anledningar.
 § 3.6 Vid kunds bristande betalningsförmåga, 20 dagar efter förfallodag, har GIKA.SE rätt att stänga av kunds tjänst tills dess fullbetalning har erlagts.
 § 4.1 Pris och betalning:
 Startavgift kan förekomma under vissa toppdomäner (TLD).
 Leveranstid är omedelbart för realtidsdomäner, då betalväxel godkänt transfer av summan.
 Leveranstid vid manuella domäner är normalt inom 24-48 timmar, efter betalning är erlagd.
 GIKA.SE följer lagen om distansköp: Svensk Författningssamling (2005:59) https://www.notisum.se/Rnp/sls/lag/20050059.htm Lagen innebär att du som privatkund har rätt att ångra ett distansköp inom 14 dagar från det att du tagit emot varan. Retur accepteras endast under förutsättning att domänen ej är registrerad.
 Utdrag ur 2005:59 4 §
 Bestämmelserna om ångerrätt i 9–16 §§ gäller inte distansavtal om
 Domännamn, skickade SMS samt liknande tjänster är exempel på en vara som inte går att återlämna.
 Vid eventuella felstavningar i domännamn från kunds sida så ställer sig GIKA.SE utanför ansvar.
 Har GIKA.SE registerat fel domännamn eller prefix kan kund begära återbetalning eller omregistrering med rätt namn.
 § 4.2 Avgifter för webbabonnemang och förnyelse av abonnemang utgår i form av förskottsbetalning via faktura. Betalningsvillkor 20 dagar netto om inget annat avtalas. GIKA.SE äger rätt att tillägga expeditionsavgift om 40 kr exkl moms på pappersfaktura. Påminnelseavgift vid pappersfaktura, 50 kr exkl moms påföres alltid enligt lag.
 § 4.3 Abonnent som underlåter att betala kommer att stängas ute från sitt abonnemang, dock ej innan att betalningspåminnelse eller varning har skickats antingen via e-post eller vanligt brev. Uteblir betalning efter påminnelse har GIKA.SE rätt att skicka ärendet vidare till inkassobolag. Har webbabonnemanget gått vidare till inkassobolag tillkommer en avgift för att få öppna upp webbabonnemanget igen. Öppnandet kan tidigast göras när GIKA.SE fått en slutrapport från inkassobolag att kravet är fullbetalt. Abonnenten måste själv skriftligen begära öppning av sitt webbabonnemang via E- post, fax eller brev.
 § 4.4 Dröjsmålsränta utgår med 18 % från 3 dagar efter förfallodagen och tills dess att betalning fullgjorts.
 § 4.5 Abonnenten skall snarast meddela GIKA.SE om faktura anses felaktig. Sker detta inte inom skälig tid (inom 10 dagar efter fakturadatum) förlorar abonnenten rätten att göra invändning mot fakturan. Har abonnenten i tid invänt mot fakturan och anfört en saklig grund mot debiteringen, skall GIKA.SE medge anstånd med betalningen av det tvistiga beloppet. Medges anstånd utgår dröjsmålsränta på den del av det tvistiga beloppet som abonnenten är skyldig att betala.
 § 4.6 Samtalskostnader från abonnentens teleoperatör för uppkoppling tillkommer och ligger utanför GIKA.SEs ansvar.
 § 4.7 Avgiftsändring kan endast träda i kraft i samband med ny avtalsperiod.
 § 4.10 GIKA.SE kan inte hållas ansvarig för abonnents omkostnader.
 § 4.11 GIKA.SE har rätt att göra kreditupplysning på kund innan order accpteras. GIKA.SE har rätt att makulera order om pris på hemsida eller orderformulär är felaktigt eller kund angett felaktiga kunduppgifter.
 § 5.1 Abonnenten får överlåta avtalet endast efter GIKA.SEs medgivande. Överlåtelsen och medgivandet skall ske skriftligen. Den frånträdande abonnenten är inte betalningsskyldig för förpliktelser som uppkommer efter överlåtelsetidpunkten. Den tillträdande abonnenten är inte betalningsskyldig för förpliktelser som uppkommit innan överlåtelsetidpunkten.
 § 6 GIKA.SEs ansvar
 § 6.1 GIKA.SE utövar ingen kontroll över information eller material som finns på GIKA.SEs servrar. GIKA.SE är ej ansvarigt eller skadeståndsskyldigt för direkta eller indirekta skador och ekonomiska förluster på grund av fel, fördröjningar, ofullkomligheter, avbrott, uteblivna leveranser i form av data, bristande tillgänglighet eller liknande omständigheter eller händelser. GIKA.SE är ej heller skadeståndsskyldigt om någon gör intrång eller skadlig kod körs på GIKA.SEs datorresurser och skaffar sig tillgång till, förstör eller förvanskar information.
 § 6.2 GIKA.SE förbehåller sig rätten att av systemtekniska skäl flytta information till annat datamedia. GIKA.SE har rätt att byta server eller mjukvara mot annan server eller mjukvara om GIKA.SE anser att det behövs för att säkerställa drift eller förbättra prestanda.
 § 6.3 Då abonnemang upphört genom skriftlig uppsägning, har GIKA.SE efter sista datumet på gällande faktura inget ansvar för hemsida, domän eller e-postkonton. Har abonnemanget upphört genom utebliven betalning omdirigeras ej ankommande datorpost, epost, SMS, domän eller hemsida.
 § 6.4 GIKA.SE hanterar all kundinformation såsom konfidentiell, detta för att värna om kundens integritet. Dock kan GIKA.SE via domstolsföreläggande åläggas att lämna ut sådana uppgifter till berörda myndigheter.
 § 7.2 Abonnenten förbinder sig att inte göra obehörigt intrång i de datorresurser som är kopplade till Internet i dess helhet och ej heller hos GIKA.SE.
 § 7.5 Abonnenten får inte sälja plats till egna abonnenter inom ramen för sitt hårddiskutymme utan skriftligt tillstånd från GIKA.SE. Detta gäller både abonnenter med egen domän och abonnenter under GIKA.SE domän. Återförsäljare eller Partner av GIKA.SEs tjänster får däremot göra detta.
 § 7.6 Domännamnsregistrering, när kund registrerar ett domännamn, godkänner kunden även den aktuella toppdomänens (registerhållarens) generella villkor och avtal. Kontakta GIKA.SE om villkor för den aktuella toppdomänen saknas vid registreringstillfället. Alla gTLD samt .nu lyder under UDRP: https://www.icann.org/en/udrp/udrp-policy-24oct99.htm
 Utdrag, Kunduppgifter skall stämma: ”By applying to register a domain name, or by asking us to maintain or renew a domain name registration, you hereby represent and warrant to us that (a) the statements that you made in your Registration Agreement are complete and accurate.”
 Abonnenten skall kontrollera och uppdatera kontaktuppgifter minst 1 gång per år i GIKA.SE kontrollpaneler för vald tjänst.
 § 8.1 GIKA.SE vill inte, vare sig själva eller, att våra kunder skall figurera i samband med oseriös användning av Internet. GIKA.SE förbehåller sig därför rätten till fri prövning av nedanstående regler.
 § 8.2 GIKA.SE har tillåtelse att göra kontroller av informationen på våra kunders lagringsutrymme. Om en användare bryter mot abonnemangsavtalet, förbehåller vi oss rätten att blockera den information som anses olämplig, är överträdelsen grov kan abonnenten avstängas helt eller delvis, från fortsatt nyttjande.
 § 8.3 Webbabonnemang innebär att abonnenten har möjlighet att publicera och tillhandahålla material på Internet via WWW eller FTP-teknik. Underhåll och skötsel av materialet utförs av kund via webbsidan eller kontrollpaneler som GIKA.SE tillhandahåller från tid till annan.
 § 8.4 GIKA.SE skall alltid ha direktavtal med ägaren till domännamnet under vilket web-sidorna publiceras. Det skall av webb-sidorna klart framgå vilket firma- eller organisationsnamn som ansvarar för sidornas publicering.
 § 8.5 Abonnenten kan delegera drift av webb-utformning, uppdatering etc – till skriftligen angiven annan person eller organisation. Detta begränsar inte webb-ägarens ansvar.
 § 8.6 GIKA.SE förbehåller sig rätten att stänga av en kunds webbabonnemang om vi bedömer att innehållet kan anses vara stötande, t.ex. sidor med pornografiskt innehåll.
 § 9.1 GIKA.SE skall vara befriat från skadestånd och andra påföljder om fullgörelsen av avtalet hindras eller försvåras av någon omständighet – såsom t.ex. krig, myndighetsingripande, oroligheter, inskränkningar i energitillförseln, arbetsmarknadsstörningar, förbud, restriktioner, uteblivna tillstånd, olyckshändelser, ogynnsamma transport- eller väderleksförhållanden eller uteblivna leveranser från underleverantörer – som GIKA.SE skäligen inte kunnat förutse vid tiden för avtalets slutande och vars följder GIKA.SE inte heller kunnat undvika eller övervinna.
 § 10, Tvist
 Inställningar för mail


text:
21 Cdo 1166/2004
 Datum rozhodnutí: 18.10.2004
 Dotčené předpisy: § 243b odst. 1 předpisu č. 99/1963Sb., § 243b odst. 5 předpisu č. 99/1963Sb., § 218 odst. 5 písm. c) předpisu č. 99/1963Sb.
 Nejvyšší soud České republiky rozhodl v senátě složeném z předsedy senátu JUDr. Mojmíra Putny a soudců JUDr. Ljubomíra Drápala a JUDr. Zdeňka Novotného v právní věci žalobce F. S., zastoupeného advokátem, proti žalovanému L., státní podnik v likvidaci, zastoupenému advokátem, o 1,183.707,- Kč a o placení 13.836,- Kč měsíčně s příslušenstvím, vedené u Okresního soudu v Domažlicích pod sp.zn. 3 C 129/2002, o dovolání žalovaného proti rozsudku Krajského soudu v Plzni ze dne 4. března 2004, č.j. 14 Co 76/2004-348, takto :
 II. Žalovaný je povinen zaplatit žalobci na náhradě nákladů dovolacího řízení 7.575,- Kč do tří dnů od právní moci tohoto usnesení k rukám advokáta.
 Dovolání žalovaného proti rozsudku Krajského soudu v Plzni ze dne 4. 3. 2004, č.j. 14 Co 76/2004-348, kterým byl změněn rozsudek Okresního soudu v Domažlicích ze dne 30. 1. 2003, č.j. 3 C 129/2002-287, ve věci samé, v části, v níž bylo rozhodnuto o povinnosti žalovaného zaplatit žalobci 840.420,- Kč a dále mu platit počínaje 1. únorem 2004 měsíční rentu ve výši 12.292,- Kč, není přípustné podle ustanovení § 237 odst. 1 písm. a) o.s.ř. (ohledně tohoto nároku žalobce rozhodly oba soudy stejně). Dovolání proti této části rozsudku odvolacího soudu není přípustné ani podle ustanovení § 237 odst. 1 písm. b) o.s.ř. (soud prvního stupně rozhodl jinak, než ve svém dřívějším rozsudku, v důsledku zrušovacího rozhodnutí dovolacího soudu, nikoli soudu odvolacího, jímž tento zrušil předchozí rozhodnutí soudu prvního stupně - srov. usnesení Nejvyššího soudu ČR ze dne 2.6.1998, sp. zn. 23 Cdo 1075/98, uveřejněné v časopise Soudní judikatura, pod č. 147, roč. 1998) a nebylo shledáno přípustným ani podle ustanovení § 237 odst. 1 písm. c) o.s.ř., neboť napadený rozsudek odvolacího soudu nemá po právní stránce - s ohledem na to, že odvolací soud vycházel ze závazného právního názoru dovolacího soudu (srov. § 243d odst. 1 o.s.ř.) vyjádřeného v rozsudku ze dne 13. 8. 2002, č.j. 21 Cdo 1234/2001-235, a dovolací soud tam uvedené závěry nadále považuje za správné - zásadní význam (§ 237 odst. 3 o.s.ř.).
 Dovolání proti rozsudku odvolacího soudu je přípustné podle ustanovení § 237 odst. 1 písm. b) o.s.ř. pouze v části, v níž bylo rozhodnuto o povinnosti žalovaného platit žalobci náhradu za ztrátu na výdělku dalších 1.544,- Kč měsíčně počínaje 1. únorem 2004. S přihlédnutím k tomu, že odvolací soud vycházel ze závazného právního názoru dovolacího soudu (srov. § 243d odst. 1 o.s.ř.) vyjádřeného v této věci v rozsudku ze dne 13. 8. 2002, č.j. 21 Cdo 1234/2001-235, a tím i z ustálené judikatury Nejvyššího soudu ČR (srov. např. rozsudek Nejvyššího soudu ČR ze dne 9. 8. 2000, sp. zn. 21 Cdo 1365/99, popř. rozsudek Nejvyššího soudu ČR ze dne 13. 11. 2002, sp. zn. 21 Cdo 542/2002) a protože žalovaný zpochybňuje pouze tyto závěry odvolacího soudu, je dovolání žalovaného proti této části rozsudku odvolacího soudu zjevně bezdůvodné (§ 243b odst.1 o.s.ř.).
 Z uvedeného vyplývá, že dovolání žalovaného směřuje z části proti rozhodnutí odvolacího soudu, proti němuž není tento mimořádný opravný prostředek přípustný, a z části je zjevně bezdůvodné. Nejvyšší soud České republiky proto dovolání žalovaného aniž by se mohl věcí dále zabývat - podle ustanovení § 243b odst. 1 a odst. 5 věty první a § 218 písm. c) o. s. ř. odmítl.
 V dovolacím řízení vznikly žalobci v souvislosti se zastoupením advokátem náklady, které spočívají v paušální odměně ve výši 7.500,- Kč (srov. § 3 odst. 1 bod 6., § 16 odst. 2, § 10 odst. 3, § 14 odst. 1, § 15 a § 18 odst. 1 vyhlášky č. 484/2000 Sb., ve znění vyhlášky č. 49/2001 Sb. a č. 110/2004 Sb.) a v paušální částce náhrady výdajů za jeden úkon právní služby ve výši 75,- Kč (srov. § 13 odst. 3 vyhlášky č. 177/1996 Sb., ve znění vyhlášek č. 235/1997 Sb. a č. 484/2000 Sb.), celkem ve výši 7.575,- Kč. Protože dovolání žalovaného bylo odmítnuto, dovolací soud mu podle ustanovení § 243b odst. 5 věty první, § 224 odst. 1 a § 146 odst. 3 o.s.ř. uložil, aby žalobci tyto náklady nahradil. Žalovaný je povinen přiznanou náhradu nákladů řízení zaplatit k rukám advokáta, který žalobce v tomto řízení zastupoval (§ 149 odst. 1 o.s.ř.).
 V Brně dne 18. října 2004


text:
 Avis juridique important
 |
 21994D1231(11)
 Decisão do Comité Misto do EEE no 40/94, de 15 de Dezembro de 1994, que altera o anexo II (regulamentação técnica, normas, ensaios e certificação) do Acordo EEE
 Jornal Oficial no L 372 de 31/12/1994 p. 0014 - 0015
 DECISÃO DO COMITÉ MISTO DO EEENo 40/94de 15 de Dezembro de 1994que altera o anexo II (regulamentação técnica, normas, ensaios e certificação) do Acordo EEEO COMITÉ MISTO DO EEE, Tendo em conta o Acordo sobre o Espaço Económico Europeu, adaptado pelo protocolo que adapta o Acordo sobre o Espaço Económico Europeu, a seguir designado «o acordo», e, nomeadamente, o seu artigo 98o, Considerando que o anexo II do acordo foi alterado pela Decisão do Comité Misto do EEE no 7/94, de 21 de Março de 1994, que altera o protocolo no 47 e alguns anexos do Acordo EEE (); Considerando que a Directiva 94/10/CE do Parlamento Europeu e do Conselho, de 23 de Março de 1994, que altera substancialmente pela segunda vez a Directiva 83/189/CEE, relativa a um procedimento de informação no domínio das normas e regulamentações técnicas (), deve ser incorporada no acordo, DECIDE: Artigo 1o1. Ao anexo II do acordo, no ponto 1 (Directiva 83/189/CEE do Conselho) do capítulo XIX, antes da indicação das adaptações, é inserido o seguinte travessão: «-394 L 0010: Directiva 94/10/CE do Parlamento Europeu e do Conselho, de 23 de Março de 1994 (JO no L 100 de 19. 4. 1994, p. 30).». 2. No ponto 1 (Directiva 83/189/CEE do Conselho): a)Na adaptação a), a expressão «no 7 do artigo 1o» é substituída por «no 1 do artigo 1o» e o número «7» substituído por «1»; b)É aditada a seguinte nova adaptação, como adaptação b): «b)O no 2, segundo parágrafo, do artigo 1o passa a ter a seguinte redacção: "A expressão 'especificação técnica` abrange igualmente métodos e processos de produção utilizados em relação a produtos destinados ao consumo humano e animal e a produtos medicinais, de acordo com a definição prevista no artigo 1o da Directiva 65/65/CEE (capítulo XIII, ponto 1, do anexo II do acordo), bem como métodos e processos relacionados com outros produtos, sempre que os mesmos tiverem efeito sobre as suas características."»; c)É suprimida a anterior adaptação e); d)As anteriores adaptações b), c) e d) passam, respectivamente, a ser adaptações c), d) e e); e)Na introdução à adaptação d), isto é, a anterior adaptação c), o termo «segundo» é substituído por «quarto»; f)Na introdução à adaptação g), a expressão «lista 1 do anexo» é substituída por «Anexo II». Artigo 2oOs textos da Directiva 94/10/CE, nas línguas finlandesa, islandesa, norueguesa e sueca, que se encontram em anexo às respectivas versões linguísticas da presente decisão, fazem fé. Artigo 3oA presente decisão entra em vigor em 1 de Fevereiro de 1995, desde que tenham sido efectuadas ao Comité Misto do EEE todas as notificações previstas no no 1 do artigo 103o do acordo. Artigo 4oA presente decisão será publicada na secção EEE e no suplemento EEE do Jornal Oficial das Comunidades Europeias. Feito em Bruxelas, em 15 de Dezembro de 1994. Pelo Comité Misto do EEEO PresidenteH. HAFSTEIN() JO no L 160 de 28. 6. 1994, p. 1. () JO no L 100 de 19. 4. 1994, p. 30.


type: wikipedia

text:
Mar is léir ón ainm féin, ba thúr do chlog a bhí sa chloigtheach go bunúsach. Meastar go minic gur ionaid chosanta a bhí iontu in aghaidh ionsaithe na Lochlannach, ach is léir gur beag an mhaith a bheadh ina leithéid mar chosaint. Tógadh iad de ghnáth in aice le séipéal nó mainistir, agus bhíodh an doras ar aonlíne de ghnáth le doras thar an phríomhshéipéil. Is féidir a fháil amach ar an dóigh seo cá bhfuil iarsmaí séipéil nuair nach bhfuil siad le feiceáil ar an láthair níos mó.
 In Éirinn agus in Albain atá cloigthithe le fáil, agus tógadh a bhformhór idir an 9ú agus an 12ú haois. Measadh gur tógadh iad mar thúir faire agus cosanta, go mbíodh faireoir ann chun amhrac amach do longa na Lochlannach agus rabhadh a thabhairt don phobal, agus go dteitheadh na daoine suas sa túr ansin. Ach ní léir go mbeadh aon úsáid phraiticiúil iontu mar go mbeadh sé ródheacair dréimire a tharraingt aníos tríd an doras a bhíonn tamall suas ón talamh de ghnáth, agus bheadh sé furast na daoine a mharú istigh iontu le deatach mar go raibh leagan amach ar nós simléir orthu. Meastar go raibh struchtúir adhmaid tógtha in aice leis na cloigthithe, agus fuarthas iarsmaí chuaillí le linn tochailtí a dhearbhódh é sin. Úsáideadh iad chun earraí luachmhara a stóráil agus chun daoine a ghlaoch chun aifrinn trí chloig a bhualadh.
 Tá na cloigthithe idir 18 agus 40 méadar ar airde, agus is é an ceann ag Cill Mhac Dua an ceann is airde in Éirinn. Tháinig athrú ar an stíl thógála le himeacht na mblianta, cloch gharbh á úsáid ar dtús agus níos mó saoirseachta le feiceáil níos déanaí. Bíonn an doras idir dhá mhéadar agus sé mhéadar os cionn na talún, agus ní fhéadfaí dul suas ach le dréimire. Bhíodh urláir adhmaid iontu, idir dhá cheann agus ceithre cinn, agus dréimirí eatarthu. Scoilteanna caola sa bhalla a bhí sna fuinneoga. Díon cloiche a bhíodh orthu chomh maith, agus leagadh a lán acu sin le himeacht na mblianta le tintreach. Timpeall 120 cloigtheach a bhí in Éirinn, agus is fothraigh a bhformhór anois. Tá beagnach fiche cloigtheach ar fud na tíre i ndeachuí áfach, ceann an-cháiliúil i nGleann Dá Loch, ceann i gCluain Dolcáin i mBaile Átha Cliath, agus ar Loch Éirne. Tá cloigtheach le feiceáil ar thailte na hardeaglaise ag Brechin in Albain.
 Stair na hÉireann


text:
 27.5.2020
 IT
 Gazzetta ufficiale dell’Unione europea
 L 164/49
 REGOLAMENTO DI ESECUZIONE (UE) 2020/706 DELLA COMMISSIONE
 del 26 maggio 2020
 recante trecentoquattordicesima modifica del regolamento (CE) n. 881/2002 del Consiglio che impone specifiche misure restrittive nei confronti di determinate persone ed entità associate alle organizzazioni dell’ISIL (Da’esh) e di Al-Qaeda
 LA COMMISSIONE EUROPEA,
 visto il trattato sul funzionamento dell’Unione europea,
 visto il regolamento (CE) n. 881/2002 del Consiglio, del 27 maggio 2002, che impone specifiche misure restrittive nei confronti di determinate persone ed entità associate alle organizzazioni dell’ISIL (Da’esh) e di Al-Qaeda (1), in particolare l’articolo 7, paragrafo 1, lettera a), e l’articolo 7 bis, paragrafo 1,
 considerando quanto segue:
 (1)
 Nell’allegato I del regolamento (CE) n. 881/2002 figura l’elenco delle persone, dei gruppi e delle entità a cui si applica il congelamento dei fondi e delle risorse economiche a norma del medesimo regolamento.
 (2)
 Il 21 maggio 2020 il comitato per le sanzioni del Consiglio di sicurezza delle Nazioni Unite ha deciso di aggiungere una voce all’elenco delle persone, dei gruppi e delle entità a cui si applica il congelamento dei fondi e delle risorse economiche.
 (3)
 È pertanto opportuno modificare di conseguenza l’allegato I del regolamento (CE) n. 881/2002.
 (4)
 Il presente regolamento dovrebbe entrare in vigore immediatamente per garantire l’efficacia delle misure ivi contemplate,
 HA ADOTTATO IL PRESENTE REGOLAMENTO:
 Articolo 1
 L’allegato I del regolamento (CE) n. 881/2002 è modificato conformemente all’allegato del presente regolamento.
 Articolo 2
 Il presente regolamento entra in vigore il giorno della pubblicazione nella Gazzetta ufficiale dell’Unione europea.
 Il presente regolamento è obbligatorio in tutti i suoi elementi e direttamente applicabile in ciascuno degli Stati membri.
 Fatto a Bruxelles, il 26 maggio 2020
 Per la Commissione
 a nome della presidente
 Direttore generale
 Direzione generale della Stabilità finanziaria, dei servizi finanziari e dell’Unione dei mercati dei capitali
 (1) GU L 139 del 29.5.2002, pag. 9.
 ALLEGATO
 Nell’allegato I del regolamento (CE) n. 881/2002, la voce seguente è aggiunta all’elenco «Persone fisiche»:
 «Amir Muhammad Sa’id Abdal-Rahman al-Mawla (nome nella grafia originale: أمیر محمد سعید عبد الرحمن المولى) [alias certi a) Abu Ibrahim al-Hashimi al-Qurashi, b) Hajji Abdallah, c) Abu ‘Umar al-Turkmani, d) Abdullah Qardash, e) Abu ‘Abdullah Qardash, f) al-Hajj Abdullah Qardash, g) Hajji Abdullah Al-Afari, h) ‘Abdul Amir Muhammad Sa’id Salbi, i) Muhammad Sa’id ‘Abd-al-Rahman al-Mawla, j) Amir Muhammad Sa’id ‘Abd-al-Rahman Muhammad al-Mula; alias incerti a) Al-Ustadh, b) Ustadh Ahmad]. Data di nascita: a) 5.10.1976, b) 1.10.1976. Luogo di nascita: a) Tall’Afar, Iraq, b) Mosul, Iraq. Nazionalità: irachena. Altre informazioni: leader dello Stato islamico dell’Iraq e del Levante, elencato come Al-Qaeda in Iraq. Data di designazione di cui all’articolo 7 quinquies, paragrafo 2, lettera i): 21.5.2020.»