type: caselaw

jurisdiction: EU

text:
 14.3.2022
 GA
 Iris Oifigiúil an Aontais Eorpaigh
 C 119/8
 Achomharc arna thabhairt an 2 Nollaig 2021 ag Altice Group Lux Sàrl, roimhe seo New Altice Europe BV, faoi leachtú i gcoinne bhreithiúnas na Cúirte Ginearálta (Séú Dlísheomra) a fógraíodh an 22 Meán Fómhair 2021 i gCás T-425/18 Altice Europe v an Coimisiún
 (Cás C-746/21 P)
 (2022/C 119/27)
 Teanga an cháis: an Béarla
 Tionscnaíodh an cás seo roimh an 1 Eanáir 2022, dáta deiridh an mhaolaithe ar an nGaeilge.


type: contracts

text:
 Tähtis õiguslik teade
 |
 22003A0828(01)
 Euroopa Liidu Teataja L 216 , 28/08/2003 Lk 0027 - 0041
 Euroopa ühenduse ja Vene Föderatsiooni vahel kirjavahetuse teel sõlmitud kokkulepe, millega kehtestatakse topeltkontrolli süsteem ilma koguseliste piiranguteta teatavate terasetoodete ekspordile Vene Föderatsioonist Euroopa ÜhendusseA. Euroopa Ühenduse kiriMoskva, 30. juuli 2003Lugupeetud ...1. Mul on au viidata 13. oktoobril 1997. aastal Euroopa Ühenduse ja Vene Föderatsiooni vahel kirjavahetuse teel sõlmitud kokkuleppele, millega kehtestatakse topeltkontrolli süsteem ilma koguseliste piiranguteta teatavate EÜ ja ESTÜ lepingutega hõlmatud terasetoodete ekspordile Vene Föderatsioonist Euroopa Ühendusse. Süsteem jõustus 5. novembril 1997 alates sellest kuupäevast kuni 31. detsembrini 1999 ning seda pikendati viimatinimetatud kuupäevast kuni 31. detsembrini 2001.2. Euroopa Söe- ja Teraseühenduse ning Vene Föderatsiooni vahel seoses uue teraselepinguga peetud läbirääkimiste käigus leppisid lepinguosalised kokku topeltkontrolli süsteemi laiendamise osas ilma koguseliste piiranguteta teatavatele terasetoodetele alates 1. jaanuarist 2002 kuni 31. detsembrini 2004, et suurendada läbipaistvust ja vältida kaubanduse võimalikku kahjustamist. Topeltkontrolli süsteemi üksikasjad on lisatud käesolevale kirjale.3. Käesolev kirjavahetus ei piira kahepoolsete kaubandust ja kaubandusküsimusi käsitlevate lepingute asjakohaste sätete, eriti dumpinguvastaste abinõude ja kaitsemeetmetega seotud sätete kohaldamist.4. Kumbki lepinguosaline võib igal ajal teha ettepanekuid lisa või selle liidete muutmiseks, milleks on vaja lepinguosaliste vastastikune nõusolek ja mis jõustuvad vastavalt nendevahelisele kokkuleppele. Juhul, kui Euroopa Ühendus peaks algatama teatava topeltkontrolli süsteemi alla kuuluva toote osas dumpinguvastase või kaitsemeetmeid käsitleva uurimise või võtma vastavad meetmed, otsustab Vene Föderatsioon, kas jätta kõnealune toode topeltkontrolli süsteemist välja. Selline otsus ei mõjuta kõnealuse toote vabasse ringlusse laskmist ühenduses.5. Lõpetuseks on mul au teha ettepanek, et kui käesolev kiri, lisa ja selle liited on Teie valitsusele vastuvõetavad, moodustavad käesolev kiri ja Teie kinnitus üheskoos Euroopa Ühenduse ja Vene Föderatsiooni vahelise kokkuleppe, mis jõustub Teie vastuse saatmise kuupäeval.Palun võtke vastu minu sügav lugupidamine.Euroopa Ühenduse nimel+++++ TIFF +++++B. Vene Föderatsiooni valitsuse kiriMoskva, 30. juuli 2003Lugupeetud ...Mul on au teatada, et sain kätte Teie tänase kuupäevaga kirja, mille sisu on järgmine:"1. Mul on au viidata 13. oktoobril 1997. aastal Euroopa Ühenduse ja Vene Föderatsiooni vahel kirjavahetuse teel sõlmitud kokkuleppele, millega kehtestatakse topeltkontrolli süsteem ilma koguseliste piiranguteta teatavate EÜ ja ESTÜ lepingutega hõlmatud terasetoodete ekspordile Vene Föderatsioonist Euroopa Ühendusse. Süsteem jõustus 5. novembril 1997 alates sellest kuupäevast kuni 31. detsembrini 1999 ning seda pikendati viimatinimetatud kuupäevast kuni 31. detsembrini 2001.2. Euroopa Söe- ja Teraseühenduse ning Vene Föderatsiooni vahel seoses uue teraselepinguga peetud läbirääkimiste käigus leppisid lepinguosalised kokku topeltkontrolli süsteemi laiendamise osas ilma koguseliste piiranguteta teatavatele terasetoodetele alates 1. jaanuarist 2002 kuni 31. detsembrini 2004, et suurendada läbipaistvust ja vältida kaubanduse võimalikku kahjustamist. Topeltkontrolli süsteemi üksikasjad on lisatud käesolevale kirjale.3. Käesolev kirjavahetus ei piira kahepoolsete kaubandust ja kaubandusküsimusi käsitlevate lepingute asjakohaste sätete, eriti dumpinguvastaste abinõude ja kaitsemeetmetega seotud sätete kohaldamist.4. Kumbki lepinguosaline võib igal ajal teha ettepanekuid lisa või selle liidete muutmiseks, milleks on vaja lepinguosaliste vastastikune nõusolek ja mis jõustuvad vastavalt nendevahelisele kokkuleppele. Juhul, kui Euroopa Ühendus peaks algatama teatava topeltkontrolli süsteemi alla kuuluva toote osas dumpinguvastase või kaitsemeetmeid käsitleva uurimise või võtma vastavad meetmed, otsustab Vene Föderatsioon, kas jätta kõnealune toode topeltkontrolli süsteemist välja. Selline otsus ei mõjuta kõnealuse toote vabasse ringlusse laskmist ühenduses.5. Lõpetuseks on mul au teha ettepanek, et kui käesolev kiri, lisa ja selle liited on Teie valitsusele vastuvõetavad, moodustavad käesolev kiri ja Teie kinnitus üheskoos Euroopa Ühenduse ja Vene Föderatsiooni vahelise kokkuleppe, mis jõustub Teie vastuse saatmise kuupäeval."Mul on au kinnitada, et eespool nimetatu on minu valitsusele vastuvõetav ning et Teie kiri, käesolev vastus ja kaasnev lisa moodustavad vastavalt Teie ettepanekule üheskoos kokkuleppe.Palun võtke vastu minu sügav lugupidamine.Vene Föderatsiooni valitsuse nimel+++++ TIFF +++++--------------------------------------------------LISA1.1. Alates 1. jaanuarist 2002 kuni 31. detsembrini 2004, kui lepinguosalised ei otsusta süsteemi rakendamist varem lõpetada, tuleb I liites loetletud ja Vene Föderatsioonist pärit toodete importimisel ühendusse esitada ühenduse ametiasutuste väljastatud järelevalvedokument, mis vastab II liites esitatud mudelile.1.2. Alates 1. jaanuarist 2002 kuni 31. detsembrini 2004, kui lepinguosalised ei otsusta süsteemi rakendamist varem lõpetada, tuleb I liites loetletud ja Vene Föderatsioonist pärit toodete importimisel ühendusse esitada lisaks sellele Vene Föderatsiooni pädevate asutuste väljastatud ekspordidokument. Importija peab ekspordidokumendi originaali esitama hiljemalt selle aasta 31. märtsil, mis järgneb aastale, millal dokumendiga hõlmatud kaubad välja saadeti.1.3. Vedu loetakse toimunuks päeval, mil tooted laaditi ekspordiks kasutatavatele transpordivahenditele.1.4. Ekspordidokument peab vastama III liites esitatud näidisele. See kehtib ekspordi puhul kogu ühenduse tolliterritooriumil.1.5. Vene Föderatsioon teatab Euroopa Ühenduste Komisjonile asjaomaste Vene valitsusasutuste nimed ja aadressid, mis on volitatud ekspordidokumente väljastama ja neid kinnitama, ning esitab nende kasutatavate pitsatite ja allkirjade näidised. Samuti teatab Vene Föderatsioon komisjonile kõigist nendes üksikasjades toimuvatest muudatustest.1.6. Käesoleva kokkuleppega hõlmatud toodete klassifitseerimine põhineb ühenduse tariifi- ja statistikanomenklatuuril (edaspidi "CN"). Käesoleva kokkuleppega hõlmatud toodete päritolu määratakse kindlaks ühenduses kehtivate eeskirjade kohaselt.1.7. Ühenduse pädevad asutused kohustuvad teavitama Vene Föderatsiooni kõigist CNis käesoleva kokkuleppega hõlmatud toodete osas tehtavatest muudatustest enne, kui need ühenduses jõustuvad.1.8. IV liites nähakse ette teatavad topeltkontrolli süsteemi kohaldamise tehnilised sätted.2.1. Vene Föderatsioon kohustub esitama ühendusele täpse statistilise teabe Vene ametiasutuste poolt punkti 1.2 kohaselt väljastatud ekspordidokumentide kohta. Nimetatud teave saadetakse komisjonile sellele kuule järgneva kuu lõpuks, mille kohta statistilised andmed esitatakse.2.2. Ühendus kohustub esitama Vene ametiasutustele täpse statistilise teabe järelevalvedokumentide kohta, mille liikmesriigid on punkti 1.1 kohaselt välja andnud seoses Vene ametiasutuste väljastatud ekspordidokumentidega. Nimetatud teave saadetakse Vene ametiasutustele sellele kuule järgneva kuu lõpuks, mille kohta statistilised andmed esitatakse.3. Vajaduse korral võib ühe lepinguosalise taotlusel korraldada arutelu käesoleva kokkuleppe toimimisest tekkinud probleemide üle. Selline arutelu korraldatakse viivitamata. Käesoleva artikli kohastes aruteludes osalevad mõlemad lepinguosalised koostöö vaimus ning sooviga omavahelised erimeelsused lahendada.4. Nõutav teave esitatakse:- ühenduse puhul Euroopa Ühenduste Komisjonile;- Vene Föderatsiooni puhul Majandusarengu- ja Kaubandusministeeriumi mittetariifse reguleerimise osakonnale.--------------------------------------------------


type: wikipedia

text:
Bump is the surname of:
 Hulda Pierce Warren Bump and Mercy Lavinia Warren Bump, birth names of dwarf entertainers and sisters Minnie Warren (1849–1878) and Lavinia Warren (1841–1919) respectively, the latter the wife of "General Tom Thumb"
 Daniel Bump (born 1952), American mathematician
 Menzus R. Bump (1838–1913), American politician
 Nate Bump (born 1976), American Major League Baseball pitcher
 Suzanne M. Bump (born 1956), American politician and first female Massachusetts State Auditor


text:
Las elecciones presidenciales se realizarán en Montenegro en abril de 2023 para elegir al presidente de Montenegro. Las elecciones anteriores celebradas en 2018 fueron ganadas por Milo Đukanović, líder del entonces gobernante DPS, con el 53,90% de los votos en la primera vuelta.
 Sistema electoral
 El presidente de Montenegro es elegido mediante el sistema de dos vueltas; si ningún candidato obtiene la mayoría de los votos en la primera vuelta, se realiza una segunda vuelta dos semanas después. Para presentar su candidatura a la Comisión Estatal Electoral, los posibles candidatos deben reunir 7.993 firmas. Se elige un nuevo presidente cada cinco años, y solo es elegible para dos mandatos.
 Candidatos
 Candidatos potenciales
 Milo Đukanović, presidente (2018-presente), ex primer ministro, líder del DPS (desde 1998).
 Zdravko Krivokapić, primer ministro de Montenegro (2020-2022), independiente, líder de la lista Por el Futuro en 2020.
 Aleksa Bečić, Presidenta del Parlamento (2020-2022), líder de los Demócratas.
 Dritan Abazović, Primer Ministro de Montenegro (2022-presente), Viceprimer Ministro de Montenegro (2020-2022).
 Andrija Mandić, líder de la Nueva Democracia Serbia, candidato presidencial en 2008.
 Marko Carević, alcalde de Budva (2019-presente).
 Referencias
 Elecciones en Europa de 2023
 Montenegro en 2023
 Elecciones en Montenegro


type: other

text:
School of Celtic Studies / Scoil an Léinn Cheiltigh catalog › Results of search for 'pb: An Sagart, 1996'
 Results of search for 'pb: An Sagart, 1996'
 Mac Shamhráin, Ailbh...
 Patronage, politics and prose. Ceasacht inghine Guile ; Sgéala muice Meic Dhá Thó ; Oidheadh Chuinn Chéadchathaigh. by Breatnach, Caoimhín Publication: Maynooth An Sagart, 1996 . viii, 180 p. 23 cm. , Donation Ex libris Proinsias Mac Cana Item 33826. Availability: Items available: Main Library [891.6205 MM (5)] (2), Room 21 - MacCana Collection [PMC 891.6205 B] (1),
 An práta by Ó Fiannachta, Pádraig Publication: An Daingean An Sagart, 1996 . 100 p. 21 cm. Availability: Items available: Main Library [891.6205 IO (8)] (1),
 Pádraig Ó Fiannachta. by Ó Glaisne, Risteárd Publication: Maigh Nuad An Sagart, 1996 . ix, 640 p. 26 cm. Availability: Items available: Main Library [941.5082 Ó F] (1),
 Léann na Gaeilge : súil siar, súil chun cinn / in eagar ag Ruairí Ó hUiginn. by Ó hUiginn, Ruairí Publication: Maigh Nuad An Sagart, 1996 . 218 p. 21 cm. Availability: Items available: Main Library [891.6205 LCC (26)] (2),


type: legislation

text:
 Avis juridique important
 |
 51995PC0687
 Propuesta de Reglamento del Consejo sobre la apertura y forma de gestión de contingentes arancelarios comunitarios para determinados productos de la pesca originarios de Ceuta /* COM/95/0687 FINAL - CNS 95/0351 */
 Diario Oficial n° C 055 de 24/02/1996 p. 0008
 Propuesta de Reglamento del Consejo sobre la apertura y forma de gestión de contingentes arancelarios comunitarios para determinados productos de la pesca originarios de Ceuta(96/C 55/08)COM(95) 687 final - 95/0351(CNS) (Presentada por la Comisión el 15 de diciembre de 1995)EL CONSEJO DE LA UNIÓN EUROPEA, Visto el Tratado constitutivo de la Comunidad Europea, Vista el Acta de adhesión de España y de Portugal y, en particular, el último párrafo del apartado 4 de su artículo 25, Visto el apartado 3 del artículo 3 del Protocolo n° 2 del Acta de adhesión relativo a las islas Canarias, Ceuta y Melilla, Vista la propuesta de la Comisión, Visto el dictamen del Parlamento Europeo, Considerando que, en virtud del apartado 2 del artículo 3 del Protocolo n° 2 anteriormente citado, determinados productos de la pesca, originarios de Ceuta y Melilla, se podrán beneficiar de la exención de los derechos de aduana en el territorio aduanero de la Comunidad a partir del 1 de enero de 1993; que esta exención se concederá dentro del límite de los contingentes arancelarios calculados por producto y sobre la media de las cantidades efectivamente comercializadas en los años 1982, 1983 y 1984 en la parte de España incluida en el territorio aduanero de la Comunidad o exportadas a la Comunidad en su composición; Considerando que, a causa de la baja del volumen de pescado capturado y comercializado, ya no se exportan a la Comunidad los productos originarios de Ceuta que se han beneficiado del régimen arancelario establecido por el Protocolo n° 2; que, por esta razón, los contingentes arancelarios abiertos a favor de Ceuta no se han prorrogado a partir del 31 de diciembre de 1992; que los alevines y juveniles, vivos, de besugo y lubina, los besugos y lubina reemplazarán en lo sucesivo estos productos en los intercambios comerciales con la Comunidad; Considerando que la situación geográfica de Ceuta presenta particularidades por ser un enclave en el continente africano; que, en ausencia de los sectores agrario e industrial, el sector primario de Ceuta se reduce esencialmente a la pesca; que, dado que este sector atraviesa actualmente una crisis, la acuicultura se puede convertir en una fuente de ingresos alternativa a la pesca de mar para los agentes económicos de Ceuta; Considerando que la Comunidad concede a determinados terceros países un trato arancelario preferencial que conlleva la exención de los derechos de aduana para los productos clasificados en los códigos NC 0301 99 90, 0302 69 94 y 0302 69 95; que es conveniente garantizar a estos productos originarios de Ceuta e importados en la Comunidad el mismo trato arancelario que el concedido a determinados terceros países; que, con este fin, es necesaria una adaptación del régimen arancelario aplicado a Ceuta; Considerando que el objetivo de la Declaración común relativa al Protocolo n° 2 relativo a las islas Canarias, Ceuta y Melilla es permitir la sustitución de los productos contemplados en el artículo 3 de dicho Protocolo; Considerando que, mediante el Reglamento (CE) n° 1326/95 (1), el Consejo ha abierto para el año 1995, para los alevines y juveniles, vivos, de besugo y lubina, originarios de Ceuta, un contingente arancelario comunitario (número de orden 09.0321); Considerando que España ha solicitado a la Comisión la apertura de contingentes arancelarios comunitarios libres de derechos para los alevines y juveniles, vivos, de besugo y lubina, originarios de Ceuta; Considerando que es, por tanto, oportuno abrir contingentes arancelarios comunitarios libres de derechos para los productos citados, y limitar los volúmenes anuales de estos contingentes arancelarios, sobre la base de la producción anual, a 3 000 000 de unidades (alevines y juveniles de besugo y de lubina) y a 100 toneladas (besugo y lubina); que el período de los contingentes se fijará del 1 de enero al 31 de diciembre de cada año; que la aplicación del derecho contingentario estará subordinada al respeto de las normas previstas por la organización común de los mercados; Considerando que es oportuno garantizar un acceso igual y continuo de todos los importadores de la Comunidad a dicho contingente y la aplicación, ininterrumpida, del tipo previsto para dichos contingentes a todas las importaciones de los productos de que se trata en todos los Estados miembros hasta el agotamiento de los contingentes; Considerando que corresponde a la Comunidad decidir la apertura de los contingentes arancelarios; que, sin embargo, nada se opone a que, para garantizar la eficacia de la gestión común de dichos contingentes, se autorice a los Estados miembros a descontar de los volúmenes contingentarios las cantidades necesarias correspondientes a las importaciones efectivas; que, no obstante, esta forma de gestión requiere la máxima colaboración entre los Estados miembros y la Comisión, que debe poder controlar el estado de agotamiento de los volúmenes contingentarios e informar a los Estados miembros al respecto, HA ADOPTADO EL PRESENTE REGLAMENTO: Artículo 1 El presente Reglamento se aplicará sin perjuicio del régimen previsto en el Protocolo n° 2 del Acta de adhesión y de sus normas de desarrollo para los productos no cubiertos por el presente Reglamento. Artículo 2 Del 1 de enero al 31 de diciembre de cada año, los derecho de aduana a la importación en la Comunidad de los productos citados a continuación, originarios de Ceuta, se suspenderá dentro de los límites del contingente arancelario comunitario que se indica a continuación: >SITIO PARA UN CUADRO>Artículo 3 Se presentará la prueba del carácter originario de los productos de conformidad con lo dispuesto en el artículo 6 del Reglamento (CEE) n° 1135/88 del Consejo (1). Artículo 4 El contingente arancelario contemplado en el artículo 1 será gestionado por la Comisión, que podrá tomar cualquier medida administrativa necesaria para asegurar una gestión eficaz. Artículo 5 Cuando un importador presente en un Estado miembro una declaración de despacho a libre práctica que incluya una solicitud de beneficio preferencial para el producto contemplado en el presente Reglamento y las autoridades aduaneras acepten esta declaración, el Estado miembro correspondiente, a través de una notificación a la Comisión, procederá a descontar del volumen del contingente arancelario la cantidad que corresponda a estas necesidades. La solicitudes de descuento con indicación de la fecha de aceptación de dichas declaraciones deberán ser transmitidas sin demora a la Comisión. Los descuentos serán concedidos por la Comisión en función de la fecha de aceptación de las declaraciones de despacho a libre práctica por parte de las autoridades aduaneras del Estado miembro interesado, dentro de los límites del saldo disponible. Cuando un Estado miembro no utilice las cantidades giradas, dicho Estado las devolverá lo antes posible al volumen contingentario. Cuando las cantidades solicitadas sean superiores al saldo disponible del contingente, se procederá a la asignación a prorrata de las solicitudes. La Comisión informará a los Estados miembros sobre los giros efectuados. Artículo 6 Cada Estado miembro garantizará a los importadores de los productos de que se trata un acceso igual y continuo a los contingentes, mientras el saldo del volumen contingentario lo permita. Artículo 7 Los Estados miembros y la Comisión colaborarán todo lo posible para garantizar el respeto del presente Reglamento. Artículo 8 El presente Reglamento entrará en vigor el tercer día siguiente al de su publicación en el Diario Oficial de las Comunidades Europeas. El presente Reglamento será aplicable a partir del 1 de enero de 1996. El presente Reglamento será obligatorio en todos sus elementos y directamente aplicable en cada Estado miembro.(1) DO n° L 128 de 13. 6. 1995, p. 6. (1) DO n° L 114 de 2. 5. 1988, p. 1.


jurisdiction: US

text:
 301 Md. 626 (1984)
 484 A.2d 267
 MARY E. SCHWEIZER
 v.
 THOMAS SCHWEIZER.
 No. 122, September Term, 1983.
 Court of Appeals of Maryland.
 December 4, 1984.
 Daniel F. Thomas, Baltimore (Thomas & Kalichman, Baltimore, on brief), for appellant.
 William W. Cahill, Jr., Baltimore (Richard C. Burch, Michael P. Smith and Weinberg & Green, Baltimore, on brief), for appellee.
 Argued before MURPHY, C.J., and SMITH, ELDRIDGE, COLE, DAVIDSON,[*] RODOWSKY and COUCH, JJ.
 MURPHY, Chief Judge.
 By ch. 794 of the Acts of 1978, now codified as Maryland Code (1984), §§ 8-201 through 8-213 of the Family Law Article, the General Assembly of Maryland enacted the Property Disposition in Annulment and Divorce Law (the Act).[1] The Act indicates that nonmonetary contributions within a marriage should be recognized in the event that a marriage is dissolved; that a spouse whose activities do not include the production of income may nevertheless have contributed toward the acquisition of property by either or both spouses during the marriage; that when a marriage is dissolved, the property interests of the spouses should be adjusted fairly and equitably, with careful consideration given to both monetary and nonmonetary contributions made by the respective spouses; and that the accomplishment of these objectives necessitates that there be a departure from the inequity inherent in Maryland's old "title" system of dealing with the marital property of divorcing spouses. See Grant v. Zich, 300 Md. 256, 267-268, 477 A.2d 1163 (1984); McAlear v. McAlear, 298 Md. 320, 343, 469 A.2d 1256 (1984); Harper v. Harper, 294 Md. 54, 62-64, 448 A.2d 916 (1982); Deering v. Deering, 292 Md. 115, 117, 437 A.2d 883 (1981); Wimmer v. Wimmer, 287 Md. 663, 667 n. 2, 414 A.2d 1254 (1980); Pitsenberger v. Pitsenberger, 287 Md. 20, 24-25, 410 A.2d 1052, appeal dismissed 449 U.S. 807, 101 S. Ct. 52, 66 L. Ed. 2d 10, rehearing denied, 449 U.S. 1028, 101 S. Ct. 601, 66 L. Ed. 2d 491 (1980); Bender v. Bender, 282 Md. 525, 534-535 n. 7, 386 A.2d 772 (1978).
 The Act "substantially modified the traditional property rights of the husband and wife in a divorce proceeding...." Deering, supra, 292 Md. at 117, 437 A.2d 883. Although the court in granting a divorce "may not transfer the ownership of personal or real property from 1 party to the other," § 8-202(a)(3), the Act created a statutory scheme whereby the court may grant a monetary adjustment of the equities of the parties concerning marital property, § 8-205(a). A monetary award is reached by a three step process:
 (1) [T]he court shall determine which property is marital property .... § 8-203(a).
 (2) The court shall determine the value of all marital property. § 8-204.
 (3) [Upon compliance with (1) and (2)], the court may grant a monetary award as an adjustment of the equities and rights of the parties concerning marital property, whether or not alimony is awarded. The court shall determine the amount and the method of payment of a monetary award .... § 8-205(a).
 The court is governed in the first step by the statute's broad definition of marital property. Section 8-201(e) declares:
 (1) "Marital property" means the property, however titled, acquired by 1 or both parties during the marriage.
 (2) "Marital property" does not include property:
 (i) acquired before the marriage;
 (ii) acquired by inheritance or gift from a third party;
 (iii) excluded by valid agreement; or
 (iv) directly traceable to any of these sources.
 In determining the amount and method of payment of an award, the court is obliged to consider each of ten specified factors. The third factor is "the economic circumstances of each party at the time the award is to be made" and the tenth is "any other factor that the court considers necessary or appropriate to consider in order to arrive at a fair and equitable monetary award." § 8-205(a)(1) through (10).
 This "new legislative approach to the concept of marriage," Deering, 292 Md. at 122, 437 A.2d 883, should be liberally construed, Harper, supra, 294 Md. at 61, "to adjust the property interests of spouses fairly and equitably upon the dissolution of their marriage, and to give careful consideration to both monetary and nonmonetary contributions by the spouses to the well-being of the family," Bender, supra, 282 Md. at 534-535 n. 7, 386 A.2d 772. What constitutes "marital property" under § 8-201(e) is clearly "not dependent upon the legalistic concept of title." Harper, supra, 294 Md. at 78, 448 A.2d 916. Nor does a determination of what constitutes marital property depend upon the factors enumerated in § 8-205(a). Those factors come into play only with respect to the amount of the award and the method of its payment. What property is marital property and the value of that property must be determined before that step in the scheme is reached. Harper, supra, 294 Md. at 79-80, 448 A.2d 916. We there concluded with respect to which property is marital property that
 under the Maryland Act the appropriate analysis to be applied is the source of funds theory. Under that theory, when property is acquired by an expenditure of both nonmarital and marital property, the property is characterized as part nonmarital and part marital. Thus, a spouse contributing nonmarital property is entitled to an interest in the property in the ratio of the nonmarital investment to the total nonmarital and marital investment in the property. The remaining property is characterized as marital property and its value is subject to equitable distribution. Thus, the spouse who contributed nonmarital funds, and the marital unit that contributed marital funds each receive a proportionate and fair return on their investment. 294 Md. at 80, 448 A.2d 916.
 We recognized, however, that in order to apply this theory, "acquired" as it appears in the statutory definition of "marital property," § 8-201(e) must be construed
 as the on-going process of making payment for property.... Under this definition, characterization of property as nonmarital or marital depends upon the source of each contribution as payments are made, rather than the time at which legal or equitable title to or possession of the property is obtained. 294 Md. at 80, 448 A.2d 916.
 The utilization of this definition of the term "acquired," coupled with the application of the source of funds theory, leads not only to the determination of which property is marital property (the first step) but also to the determination of the value of that property (the second step). In Grant, supra, we reiterated the "principles enunciated in Harper governing the method of calculating nonmarital and marital interests and the value of marital property." 300 Md. at 276 n. 9, 477 A.2d 1163. We said:
 Property is nonmarital in the ratio that the nonmarital investment bears to the total nonmarital and marital investment in the property. To the extent that property is nonmarital, its value is not subject to equitable distribution. Property is marital in the ratio that the marital investment bears to the total nonmarital and marital investment in the property. To the extent that the property is marital, its value is subject to equitable distribution. Id.
 We illustrated the proper application of these principles with this example:
 A husband and wife acquired real property for a purchase price of $40,000. The wife contributed a down payment of $10,000 from property that she acquired prior to marriage. The remaining $30,000 was financed by a mortgage signed by both the husband and the wife. One-quarter of the value of the property is the wife's nonmarital property and three-quarters of the value of the property is marital property.
 If, at the time of the dissolution of the marriage, the property has appreciated in value to a fair market value of $60,000 and the mortgage indebtedness has been reduced to $20,000 by the payment of $10,000 of marital funds, the following division would be appropriate. One-quarter of the $60,000 fair market value of the property, or $15,000, would be the wife's nonmarital property, not subject to equitable distribution. From the remaining $45,000, $20,000, representing the unpaid mortgage balance, would be deducted leaving $25,000 as the net value of the marital property subject to equitable distribution. Id. at 276-277, 477 A.2d 1163.
 The Act does not set out how debts of the parties are to be treated with respect to a monetary award. Nor have we had occasion in our past decisions to address the question other than incidentally in the example noted in Grant to illustrate the principles enunciated in Harper. The question of the effect on a monetary award of certain outstanding debts is now before us.
 The Circuit Court for Baltimore County issued a decree divorcing Mary E. Schweizer a vinculo matrimonii from Thomas Schweizer. The decree contained an order granting a monetary award to the wife. Neither party was satisfied. The wife thought that the amount awarded should have been greater. The husband believed that no monetary award at all should have been granted. Each appealed. The Court of Special Appeals vacated the decree and remanded the case with direction to the trial court to redetermine the amount of the award under guidelines set out in the appellate court's opinion. Schweizer v. Schweizer, 55 Md. App. 373, 381, 462 A.2d 562 (1983). Again, both the husband and wife were dissatisfied. Both of them thought, albeit for different reasons, that the Court of Special Appeals had erred in its directions to the trial court for the redetermination of the amount of the award. Each sought the issuance of a writ of certiorari. We granted both petitions; they presented a common contention  that the method directed by the intermediate appellate court for the computation of the amount of the monetary award was erroneous.
 The trial court found that the husband's assets totaled $1,436,882. They consisted of shares of stock, bonds, mortgages, real properties, notes, interests in partnership ventures and the cash value of life insurance. There being a dispute as to whether some of these assets were marital property, the court made a determination. It found that certain of the shares of stock, notes, mortgages, real properties and life insurance were marital property with a total value of $322,182.[2] After considering each of the factors listed in § 8-205(a), the court determined that the wife was entitled to a monetary award in the amount of 25% of the value of the marital property, which the court computed to be $80,546. This was the amount of the monetary award designated in the decree. At the time of the grant of the award, however, the husband was indebted in the amount of $440,000; the debt was incurred by the husband during the marriage of the parties. None of it, however, was secured by marital property. Certain shares of stock owned by the husband, not included as a marital asset, served as collateral for loans totalling $350,000, and $90,000 represented unsecured loans made on the husband's signature alone. It is apparent that the trial court did not offset any of this indebtedness in arriving at the values it placed upon the various marital properties. It took each item of marital property at its actual current value as established by the evidence, except for inadvertent errors as to the life insurance and one promissory note. See note 2, supra. The opinion of the court accompanying the decree did not reveal what consideration, if any, the court gave to the $440,000 indebtedness of the husband in arriving at the amount of the monetary award.
 There was evidence indicating that the parties' opulent life style was supported, in large measure, from the proceeds of the husband's loans which were often used to fund marital expenses. Both parties agree that the monies from these loans must be considered in granting a monetary award. They differ, however, as to how they should be considered. Schweizer, 55 Md. App. at 375, 462 A.2d 562. The husband would have the total amount of his debts deducted from the total value of the marital assets in order to ascertain the actual value of the marital property. This would be done in the second step of the process leading to a monetary award under § 8-204, which commands the trial court to determine the value of all marital property. If this formula were applied here, the marital property would have a "negative" value, since the amount of the indebtedness exceeded the value of the marital property. With no marital property of value remaining, there would be no call for the grant of a monetary award, and the third step in the process would not be invoked.
 The wife's view is that debts incurred during the marriage have no relevance in the determination of the value of marital property unless the debts specifically encumber that property.[3] Therefore, she claims that inasmuch as the husband's debts do not directly encumber any of the marital assets, they should not be considered under the valuation (second) step of the process, but under the third step whereby the amount of the award and the method of its payment is determined as prescribed by § 8-205(a). The debts would be within the ambit of factor (3) of that section, to wit, "the economic circumstances of each party at the time the award is to be made" or under the catch-all factor (10).
 The Court of Special Appeals was not persuaded to follow the view of either the husband or the wife. It looked to Harper v. Harper, supra. Without the benefit of Grant's explication of that case, the Court of Special Appeals construed Harper's source of funds theory, coupled with the definition of "acquired" as the "on-going process of making payment for property," to apply only to the characterization of property as marital or nonmarital. Schweizer, supra, 55 Md. App. at 377, 462 A.2d 562. But, the intermediate appellate court believed that "the source of funds is equally important in determining the value of marital property acquired during the marriage." Id. at 377-378, 462 A.2d 562 (emphasis in original). On this premise the court concluded:
 [I]f one of the spouses takes on debt during the marriage to purchase marital property, and that debt or a portion thereof is outstanding at the time a monetary award is being considered, then the value of the marital property eligible for equitable distribution must be adjusted downward to reflect the unpaid liability. The value of marital property has not been "acquired," and therefore is immune from distribution, to the extent that the source of funds employed to finance the property is an outstanding debt, irrespective of how the debt is titled or secured. Id. at 378, 462 A.2d 562.
 The court observed that
 the thrust behind the three step statutory scheme is to ignore titles and limit any monetary award to the equity the parties have built up in marital property after paying off any debts taken on to acquire the marital property. Id.
 "Therefore," the court asserted, "the value of any marital property represented by outstanding marital debt has not been `acquired' for purposes of an equitable distribution by way of a monetary award." Id. The court emphasized: "To qualify under this rule, however, any unpaid marital debt must be directly traceable to the acquisition of marital property." Id. The reiteration in Grant, supra, 300 Md. at 276-277 n. 9, 477 A.2d 1163, of the principles enunciated in Harper, read with the example given to illustrate those principles, substantiates the belief of the Court of Special Appeals that the source of funds theory applies also to a determination of the value of marital property subject to equitable distribution.
 Harper teaches that a "marital debt" is a debt which is directly traceable to the acquisition of marital property. Conversely, a "nonmarital debt" is a debt which is not directly traceable to the acquisition of marital property. That part of marital property which is represented by an outstanding marital debt has not been "acquired" for the purpose of an equitable distribution by way of a monetary award. Therefore, the value of that marital property is adjusted downward by the amount of the marital debt. That is to say, a marital debt is considered under the second step of the process followed in reaching a monetary award, namely the valuation of marital property.
 A nonmarital debt may not serve to reduce the value of marital property. It has no function in the second step of the process. But it may be taken into consideration in the third step of the process  the determination of the amount and method of payment of the award. The amount outstanding on a nonmarital debt of a party clearly reflects on that party's economic circumstances at the time the award is to be made. § 8-205(a)(3).
 We offer a hypothetical example within the facts of this case. The trial court determined that a parcel of real property known as Betty Bush Lane was marital property and that it had a value of $150,000. Suppose the husband were able to trace $100,000 of his indebtedness directly to the acquisition of Betty Bush Lane. In that event, the value of that property for the purpose of an equitable distribution would be reduced to $50,000. By the same token, the husband's total indebtedness of $440,000 would be reduced by the $100,000 marital debt, leaving him with a nonmarital debt of $340,000. That nonmarital debt may be taken into account by the trial court, under the economic circumstances factor, in its determination of the amount and method of payment of any monetary award granted.
 The Court of Special Appeals vacated the decree granting the monetary award "[b]ecause there has been no finding by the chancellor of how much, if any, marital debt exists...." Schweizer, supra, 55 Md. App. at 379, 462 A.2d 562. This was not erroneous. It further remanded the case to the Circuit Court for Baltimore County for proceedings in accord with its opinion. The remand for additional proceedings is, of course, proper, but the proceedings before the trial court must be in accord with the opinion of this Court rather than with the opinion of the Court of Special Appeals. This is so because the opinion of the Court of Special Appeals does not spell out that a nonmarital debt may be considered under factor (3) of § 8-205(a) in the determination of the amount and method of payment of a monetary award.
 On remand to the Circuit Court for Baltimore County that court shall (1) find what portion of the husband's indebtedness, if any, is a marital debt, that is, directly traceable to the acquisition of marital property of the parties; (2) redetermine the value of the marital property in the light of any marital debt; and (3) redetermine the amount and method of payment of the monetary award after consideration of the ten factors enumerated in § 8-205(a), including in the consideration of factor (3) the impact of any nonmarital debt on the economic circumstances of the husband.
 JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS AFFIRMED EXCEPT AS TO THE DIRECTION TO THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR BALTIMORE COUNTY TO CONDUCT FURTHER PROCEEDINGS IN ACCORD WITH THE OPINION OF THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS;
 CASE REMANDED TO THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS WITH DIRECTION TO REMAND TO THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR BALTIMORE COUNTY FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS IN ACCORD WITH THE OPINION OF THE COURT OF APPEALS;
 COSTS TO BE PAID ONE-HALF BY EACH PARTY.
 NOTES
 [*] Davidson, J., participated in the hearing of the case and in the conference in regard to its decision, but died prior to the adoption of the opinion by the Court.
 [1] The provisions of the Act were formerly contained in § 3-6A-01 through § 3-6A-08 of the Courts and Judicial Proceedings Article. The sections were repealed by ch. 296 of the Acts of 1984, effective October 1, 1984. The provisions were transferred to the Family Law Article with no substantive changes here pertinent. Although the divorce decree in this case was entered prior to the effective date of the changeover, we shall cite to the Family Law sections to obviate any confusion with respect to statutory references. Hereinafter, citations to sections are to sections of the Family Law Article unless otherwise specified.
 [2] In determining the value of the husband's life insurance, which was deemed to be marital property, the court deducted the amount of a loan secured by the cash value of the policy. We note that the net cash value of the insurance was $62,700 and that the loans thereon totaled $46,000 for a net cash value of $16,700. In computing the amount of the marital property, however, the court used a net cash value of only $16,000.
 Furthermore, as the Court of Special Appeals noted, a promissory note deemed to be a marital asset was incorrectly valued at $30,000. The evidence showed, and both parties agreed, that the actual value was $10,000. Schweizer v. Schweizer, 55 Md. App. 373, 375 n. 1, 462 A.2d 562 (1983). Thus, it seems that the value of the marital property, under the trial court's method of computation, should have been $302,882.
 [3] We observe that in determining the value of the husband's life insurance, the trial court deducted from its actual cash value the outstanding balance on a loan secured by the policy. See note 2, supra.


text:
 Важна правна забележка
 |
 22000D1214(05)
 Официален вестник n° L 315 , 14/12/2000 стр. 0012 - 0013 специално чешко издание глава 11 том 05 стр. 94 - 95 специално испанско издание глава 11 том 05 стр. 94 - 95 специално унгарско издание глава 11 том 05 стр. 94 - 95 специално литвийско издание глава 11 том 05 стр. 94 - 95 LV.ES глава 11 том 05 стр. 94 - 95 MT.ES глава 11 том 05 стр. 94 - 95 PL.ES глава 11 том 05 стр. 94 - 95 SK.ES глава 11 том 05 стр. 94 - 95 специално словенско издание глава 11 том 05 стр. 94 - 95
 Решение на Съвместния комитет на ЕИПNo 75/2000от 2 октомври 2000 годиназа изменение на приложение II (Технически правила, стандарти, изпитвания и сертифициране) към Споразумението за ЕИПСЪВМЕСТНИЯТ КОМИТЕТ НА ЕИП,като взе предвид Споразумението за Европейското икономическо пространство, изменено с Протокол за адаптиране на Споразумението за Европейското икономическо пространство, оттук нататък наричано "Споразумението", и по-специално член 98 от него,като има предвид, че:(1) Приложение II към Споразумението бе изменено с Решение No 57/2000 на Съвместния комитет на ЕИП от 28 юни 2000 г. [1].(2) Регламент (ЕО) No 1069/98 на Комисията от 26 май 1998 г. за изменение на Регламент (ЕО) No 542/95 от 10 март 1995 г. относно изследването на вариациите в условията за разрешение за продажба, попадащи в обсега на Регламент (ЕИО) No 2309/93 на Съвета [2], следва да се включи в Споразумението.(3) Регламент (ЕО) No 1146/98 на Комисията от 2 юни 1998 г. за изменение на Регламент (ЕО) No 541/95 от 10 март 1995 г. относно изследването на вариациите в условията за разрешение за продажба, давано от компетентен орган на държава-членка [3], следва да се включи в Споразумението.(4) Регламент на Съвета (ЕО) No 2743/98 от 14 декември 1998 г. за изменение на Регламент (ЕО) No 297/95 относно таксите, платими на Европейската агенция за оценка на лекарствени продукти [4], следва да се включи в Споразумението.(5) Директива 1999/82/ЕО на Комисията от 8 септември 1999 г. за изменение на приложението към Директива 75/318/ЕИО на Съвета относно сближаването на законите на държавите-членки, отнасящи се за аналитичните, фармако-токсикологични и клинични стандарти и протоколи за изпитване на лекарствени продукти [5], следва да се включи в Споразумението.(6) Директива 1999/83/ЕО на Комисията от 8 септември 1999 г. за изменение на приложението към Директива 75/318/ЕИО на Съвета относно сближаването на законите на държавите-членки, отнасящи се за аналитичните, фармако-токсикологични и клинични стандарти и протоколи за изпитване на лекарствени продукти [6], следва да се включи в Споразумението,РЕШИ:Член 1В точка 2 (Директива 75/318/ЕИО на Съвета) на глава XIII на приложение II към споразумението, се добавят следните тирета:- "— 399 L 0082: Директива 1999/82/ЕО на Комисията от 8 септември 1999 г. (ОВ L 243, 15. 9.1999 г., стр. 7),- — 399 L 0083: Директива 1999/82/ЕО на Комисията от 8 септември 1999 г. (ОВ L 243, 15. 9.1999 г., стр. 9)."Член 2В точка 15з (Регламент (ЕО) No 297/95на Съвета), в глава XIII на приложение II към Споразумението, се добавя следният текст:", изменено с:- 398 R 2743: Регламент (ЕО) No 2743/98 на Съвета от 14 декември 1998 г. (ОВ L 345, 19.12.1998 г., стр. 3)."Член 3В точка 15й (Регламент (ЕО) No 541/95 на Комисията) на глава XIII на приложение II към Споразумението, се добавят следният текст:", изменено с:- 398 R 1146: Регламент (ЕО) No 1146/98 на Комисията от 2 юни 1998 г. (ОВ L 159, 3.6.1998 г., стр. 31)."Член 4В точка 15к (Регламент (ЕО) No 542/95на Комисията), в глава XIII на приложение II към Споразумението, се добавят следният текст:", изменено с:- 398 R 1069: Регламент (ЕО) No 1069/98 на Комисията от 26 май 1998 г. (ОВ L 153, 27.5.1998 г., стр. 11)."Член 5Текстовете на Регламенти (ЕО) No 1069/98 и (ЕО) No 1146/98 на Комисията, Регламент (ЕО) No 2743/98 на Съвета и на Директиви 1999/82/ЕО и 1999/83/ЕО на Комисията на исландски и норвежки език, които се публикуват в притурката за ЕИП към Официален вестник на Европейските общности, са автентичниЧлен 6Настоящото решение влиза в сила на 3 октомври 2000 г., при условие че всички нотификации до Съвместния комитет на ЕИП [] съгласно член 103, параграф 1 от Споразумението са направени.Член 7Настоящото решение се публикува в раздела за ЕИП и в притурката за ЕИП към Официален вестник на Европейските общности.Съставено в Брюксел на 2 октомври 2000 година.За Съвместния комитет на ЕИППредседателG. S. Gunnarsson[1] ОВ L 237, 21.9.2000 г., стр. 73.[2] ОВ L 153, 27.5.1998 г., стр. 11.[3] ОВ L 159, 3.6.1998 г., стр. 31.[4] ОВ L 345, 19.12.1998 г., стр. 3.[5] ОВ L 243, 15.9.1999 г., стр. 7.[6] ОВ L 243, 15.9.1999 г., стр. 9.[] Няма посочени конституционни изисквания.--------------------------------------------------


text:
Plakát Destiny 2 - Key Art (6b)
 Plakáty a nálepky
 Vyšlo: 13.04.2018 /
 Kód produktu: 87539 /
 Merchandise - Vyzdob si svůj pokoj s naší obří nabídkou plakátů na motivy oblíbených herních, filmových a komiksových sérií. Ideální dárek pro každého správného fanouška!
 Za tento nákup můžeš dostat 3 JRC Korun
 Rezervovat na výdejně
 Objednávka byla úspěšně zaplacena. Vyčkej prosím na výzvu k vyzvednutí objednávky, objednávka na tebe bude čekat na prodejně 3 pracovní dny.
 Při vyzvednutí
 Zvol prosím typ platby
 Vyzdob si svůj pokoj s naší obří nabídkou plakátů na motivy oblíbených herních, filmových a komiksových sérií. Ideální dárek pro každého správného fanouška!
 1.1. V souladu s ustanovením § 1751 odst. 1 zák. č. 89/2012 Sb., občanský zákoník ve znění pozdějších předpisů (dále též jen jako „občanský zákoník“) vydává společnost JRC Czech a.s. tyto všeobecné obchodní podmínky, jež jsou nedílnou součástí kupní smlouvy, uzavřené mezi prodávajícím a kupujícím, jak jsou specifikováni níže, a které upravují práva a povinnosti prodávajícího a kupujícího v oblasti prodeje zboží na internetovém obchodě www.jrc.cz (dále též jen „e-shop“) (dále též jen „obchodní podmínky“); nedílnou součástí těchto obchodních podmínek je také Reklamační řád, který je na adrese https://www.jrc.cz/reklamace/t-179/.
 Prodávající je obchodní společnost JRC Czech a.s., IČO: 27 07 87 95, se sídlem Naskové 1100/3, 150 00 Praha 5, zapsaná v obchodním rejstříku vedeném u Městského soudu v Praze, odd. B, vložka 8552.
 Kupující je spotřebitel nebo podnikatel, který uzavírá s prodávajícím kupní smlouvu prostřednictvím internetového obchodu prodávajícího na internetové adrese www.jrc.cz (e-shopu).
 Spotřebitel je ve smyslu ust. § 419 občanského zákoníku každý člověk, který mimo rámec své podnikatelské činnosti nebo samostatného výkonu svého povolání uzavírá smlouvu s podnikatelem nebo s ním jinak jedná. Je-li kupujícím spotřebitel dle § 419 zák. 89/2012 Sb. řídí se vztahy neupravené těmito obchodními podmínkami zákonem č. 89/2012 Sb. a zákonem č. 634/1992 Sb., o ochraně spotřebitele. Jedná-li kupující při objednávání/nákupu zboží v rámci své podnikatelské činnosti nebo v rámci svého samostatného výkonu povolání, řídí se vztahy těmito smluvními podmínkami neupravené zákonem č. 89/2012 Sb. přičemž se neužijí ustanovení § 2158 – § 2174. Podnikatel je ten, kdo samostatně vykonává na vlastní účet a odpovědnost výdělečnou činnost živnostenským nebo obdobným způsobem se záměrem činit tak soustavně za účelem dosažení zisku. Pro účely ochrany spotřebitele a pro účely § 1963 se za podnikatele považuje také každá osoba, která uzavírá smlouvy související s vlastní obchodní, výrobní nebo obdobnou činností či při samostatném výkonu svého povolání, popřípadě osoba, která jedná jménem nebo na účet podnikatele. Za podnikatele se považuje osoba zapsaná v obchodním rejstříku. Za jakých podmínek se osoby zapisují do obchodního rejstříku, stanoví jiný zákon. Má se za to, že podnikatelem je osoba, která má k podnikání živnostenské nebo jiné oprávnění podle jiného zákona.
 Předobjednávka Slouží výhradně jako předběžná rezervace takového zboží, které prodávající v budoucnu pravděpodobně naskladní, ale jehož zejména datum dodání a/nebo cena a/nebo přesné specifikace nejsou doposud prodávajícímu známy. U předobjednávek si prodávající vyhrazuje právo měnit cenu, datum dodání, vlastnosti a další skutečnosti prodávajícímu v době předobjednávky nedostupné či neznámé, a to až do doby, kdy toto zboží prodávající naskladní a určí k dalšímu prodeji. O změně ceny, resp. dalších v době předobjednávky neznámých skutečnostech, bude prodávající kupujícího náležitě informovat e-mailem nebo telefonicky a kupující může na základě této nové informace předobjednávku zrušit.
 Digitální distribuce, Digital Download nebo digitální zboží označuje takové zboží, které je distribuováno pouze elektronicky (zejména e-mailem, odkazem ke stažení atd.) a nezakládá nárok na dodání fyzických nosičů. Po úhradě digitálního zboží je kupujícímu zpravidla na jím uvedený e-mail odeslán digitální produkt, který může zahrnovat:
 i. aktivační klíč pro aktivaci produktu v systému třetí strany.
 ii. odkaz pro jednorázové stažení souborů a následnou instalaci produktu.
 Doručení digitálního produktu kupujícímu na zadaný e-mail zakládá domněnku rozbalení zboží, kdy je porušen původní obal dle ustanovení § 1837 písmeno h) Občanského zákoníku.
 2.1.Uzavřením kupní smlouvy kupující vyslovuje souhlas s těmito obchodními podmínkami a potvrzuje, že se s nimi před uzavřením kupní smlouvy náležitě seznámil, stejně jako s Reklamačním řádem, Dodacími a platebními podmínkami, a Pravidly pro ochranu osobních údajů. Kupující dále potvrzuje, že v obchodních podmínkách všem ustanovením porozuměl a neshledal žádné nejasnosti. Znění obchodních podmínek může prodávající měnit a doplňovat. Tímto ustanovením však nejsou dotčena práva a povinnosti vzniklá po dobu účinnosti předchozích znění obchodních podmínek; kupující je vázán zněním smluvních podmínek aktuálním v okamžiku uzavření kupní smlouvy. Kupující vyjadřuje souhlas s aktuálním zněním obchodním podmínek odesláním objednávky a/nebo předobjednávky.
 3. SDĚLENÍ PŘED UZAVŘENÍM SMLOUVY
 3.1. V souladu s §1820 odst. 1) občanského zákoníku poskytuje prodávající kupujícímu – spotřebiteli tyto informace před uzavřením kupní smlouvy:
 a. prodávající neúčtuje kupujícímu žádné dodatečné náklady na prostředky komunikace na dálku, které se liší od základní sazby (v příp. internetového i telefonického připojení dle podmínek operátora Kupujícího, Prodávající si neúčtuje žádné další poplatky, to se netýká příp. smluvní přepravy);
 b. kupující si při volbě platební metody volí, zda za zboží zaplatí před dodáním zboží, nebo při jeho převzetí; to neplatí u digitálního zboží, kde je možná jen platba předem. Prodávající u běžného zboží nepožaduje úhradu zálohy, a pokud ano, kupující o tom bude vyrozuměn před uzavřením kupní smlouvy;
 c. v internetovém obchodě www.jrc.cz se neuzavírají smlouvy na dobu neurčitou nebo jejímž předmětem je opakované plnění.
 d. při nákupu zboží přes internetový obchod www.jrc.cz (neplatí pro běžný nákup na prodejnách) má kupující možnost odstoupit od smlouvy:
 i. do doby, než bylo prodávajícím kupujícímu plněno; v tom případě prodávající vrátí všechny prostředky, které kupující v rámci kupní smlouvy již poskytnul.
 ii. do 14 dnů ode dne převzetí zboží. Pro účely uplatnění práva na odstoupení od smlouvy musí kupující o svém odstoupení od této smlouvy informovat prodávajícího e-mailem eshop@jrc.cz nebo písemně na adresu JRC Czech a.s., Naskové 1100/3, Praha 5, 150 00. Pro dodržení lhůty pro odstoupení od kupní smlouvy postačuje odeslat odstoupení od smlouvy před uplynutím příslušné lhůty. Kupující je povinen prokázat, nejlépe doložením kopie kupního dokladu (faktury, účtenky, dodacího listu) zakoupení věci, v případě, že kupující takový doklad nemá, musí vznik kupní smlouvy prokázat jiným dostatečně věrohodným způsobem (např. výpisem z účtu či platební karty). Zásilka by měla dále obsahovat písemné odstoupení od smlouvy; prodávající doporučuje využít k tomu formulář pro odstoupení od smlouvy.
 e. kupující nemůže odstoupit od smlouvy:
 i. o poskytování služeb, které prodávající splnil s předchozím výslovným souhlasem kupujícího před uplynutím lhůty pro odstoupení od smlouvy;
 ii. o dodávce zboží nebo služby, jejichž cena závisí na výchylkách finančního trhu nezávisle na vůli prodávajícího a k němuž může dojít během lhůty pro odstoupení od smlouvy;
 iii. o dodávce zboží, které bylo upraveno podle přání kupujícího nebo pro jeho osobu;
 iv. o dodávce zboží, které podléhá rychlé zkáze, jakož i zboží, které bylo po dodání nenávratně smíšeno s jiným zbožím;
 v. o opravě nebo údržbě provedené v místě určeném spotřebitelem na jeho žádost; to však neplatí v případě následného provedení jiných než vyžádaných oprav či dodání jiných než vyžádaných náhradních dílů;
 vi. o dodávce zboží v uzavřeném obalu, které spotřebitel z obalu vyňal a z hygienických důvodů jej není možné vrátit;
 vii. o dodávce zvukové nebo obrazové nahrávky nebo počítačového programu (tj. i počítačové (PC) hry či konzolové hry), pokud porušil jejich původní obal;
 viii. o dodávce novin, periodik nebo časopisů;
 ix. o dopravě nebo využití volného času, pokud podnikatel tato plnění poskytuje v určeném termínu;
 x. o dodání digitálního obsahu, pokud nebyl dodán na hmotném nosiči a byl dodán s předchozím výslovným souhlasem spotřebitele před uplynutím lhůty pro odstoupení od smlouvy, Prodávající zdůrazňuje, že v případě dodání digitálního obsahu dodávaného on-line nelze od takové smlouvy odstoupit.
 4.1. Kupující vybráním zboží z nabídky prodávajícího a jeho následným objednáním podává prodávajícímu návrh na uzavření kupní smlouvy. Kupní smlouva mezi prodávajícím a kupujícím je uzavřena potvrzením objednávky ze strany prodávajícího odeslaným na emailovou adresu kupujícího. V případě, že k takovémuto potvrzení ze strany prodávajícího nedojde, má se za to, že kupní smlouva nebyla uzavřena.
 4.2. Pokud je kupujícím podnikatel a kupní smlouvu uzavírá v rámci své podnikatelské činnosti, je kupní smlouva uzavřena okamžikem doručení výslovného souhlasu prodávajícího kupujícímu s jeho objednávkou či započetím plnění této objednávky.
 4.3. Uzavřením kupní smlouvy vzniká závazek prodávajícího dodat objednané zboží kupujícímu a závazek kupujícího zboží převzít a uhradit prodávajícímu dohodnutou cenu. Kupující nabývá vlastnictví ke zboží zaplacením celé kupní ceny zboží. Tímto na sebe kupující přebírá nebezpečí změny okolností ve smyslu § 1765 odst. 2 občanského zákoníku.
 4.4. Cena veškerého zboží nabízeného na e-shopu prodávajícího je uváděna včetně daně z přidané hodnoty (DPH) i všech poplatků s prodejem souvisejících (s výjimkou ceny za poštovné a balné, která je uvedena samostatně). Cena zboží je platná po dobu jejího zveřejnění v e-shopu prodávajícího.
 4.5. Prodávající si vyhrazuje právo odstoupit od kupní smlouvy nebo její části také v případě zjevné slovní nebo číselné chyby v ceně zboží (tj. cena je zjevně jiná, než je cena pro tento typ/druh zboží obvyklá). Za zjevnou slovní nebo číselnou chybu v ceně zboží je považováno například mylné uvedení číslic, zjevně nízká cena zboží, a jiné zjevné chyby v psaní. V takovém případě bude prodávající neprodleně kontaktovat kupujícího za účelem dohody o dalším postupu. Kupující nemá nárok na náhradu škody či jinou kompenzaci.
 4.6. Kupující je srozuměn s tím, že prodávající není povinen uzavřít s kupujícím kupní smlouvu na veškeré zboží uvedené v e-shopu prodávajícího, tj. že vystavení zboží v e-shopu prodávajícího není nabídkou k uzavření smlouvy ve smyslu § 1732 občanského zákoníku.
 4.7. Vlastnosti zboží, cena a dostupnost zboží jsou zpravidla uvedeny přímo u zboží. Pokud některá informace chybí nebo je nejasná, informuje se kupující na webové stránce www.jrc.cz/kontakty. Neuvedené informace o zboží nelze předpokládat.
 4.8. V případě zájmu o uzavření kupní smlouvy s prodávajícím, kupující odešle objednávku prostřednictvím formuláře e-shopu www.jrc.cz nebo e-mailem na adresu podpora@jrc.cz. Kupní smlouva se spotřebitelem je uzavřena doručením potvrzení o vytvoření objednávky od prodávajícího na email kupujícího.
 4.9. Veškeré skutečnosti uváděné kupujícím do poznámky v objednávkovém formuláři či objednávkovém e-mailu jsou součástí uzavřené kupní smlouvy v případě souhlasu prodávajícího s nimi. V případě jeho nesouhlasu se má za to, že kupní smlouva nebyla uzavřena. Stejně tak v případě nemožnosti prodávajícího splnit jakýkoliv požadavek kupujícího vyjádřený v objednávce, zašle prodávající kupujícímu nový návrh objednávky s požadavkem na jeho vyjádření se k ní. Kupní smlouva je v tomto okamžiku uzavřena odesláním této nové objednávky kupujícím prodávajícímu a jejím následným potvrzením prodávajícím.
 4.10. Prodávající je oprávněn před potvrzením objednávky, a tedy uzavřením kupní smlouvy, požádat kupujícího o telefonické či písemné potvrzení jeho objednávky.
 4.11. Způsob dodání a platby si volí kupující v rámci své objednávky a tyto jsou kupujícímu k dispozici před uzavřením kupní smlouvy. Způsoby plateb a dodací podmínky jsou uvedeny na internetových stránkách https://www.jrc.cz/jak-nakupovat/t-157/.
 4.12. Smlouva je uzavírána v českém jazyce, řídí se těmito všeobecnými podmínkami a českým právním řádem.
 4.13. Objednávat přes e-shop prodávajícího je možné 24 hodin denně, 7 dní v týdnu. V případě výpadku informačního systému nebo zásahu vyšší moci prodávající nenese odpovědnost za nedodržení provozní doby.
 5. UŽIVATELSKÝ ÚČET
 5.1. Na základě registrace kupujícího provedené na e-shopu (webové stránce) může kupující přistupovat do svého uživatelského rozhraní. Ze svého uživatelského rozhraní může kupující provádět objednávání zboží (dále jen „uživatelský účet“). V případě, že to webové rozhraní obchodu umožňuje, může kupující provádět objednávání zboží též bez registrace přímo z webového rozhraní obchodu.
 5.2. Při registraci v e-shopu a při objednávání zboží je kupující povinen uvádět správně a pravdivě všechny údaje. Údaje uvedené v uživatelském účtu je kupující při jakékoliv jejich změně povinen aktualizovat. Údaje uvedené kupujícím v uživatelském účtu a při objednávání zboží jsou prodávajícím považovány za správné.
 5.3. Přístup k uživatelskému účtu je zabezpečen uživatelským jménem a heslem. Kupující je povinen zachovávat mlčenlivost ohledně informací nezbytných k přístupu do jeho uživatelského účtu.
 5.4. Kupující není oprávněn umožnit využívání uživatelského účtu třetím osobám.
 5.5. Prodávající může zrušit uživatelský účet, a to zejména v případě, kdy kupující svůj uživatelský účet déle než 1 rok nevyužívá, či v případě, kdy kupující poruší své povinnosti z kupní smlouvy (včetně obchodních podmínek).
 5.6. Kupující bere na vědomí, že uživatelský účet nemusí být dostupný nepřetržitě, a to zejména s ohledem na nutnou údržbu hardwarového a softwarového vybavení prodávajícího, popř. nutnou údržbu hardwarového a softwarového vybavení třetích osob.
 6. DODACÍ A PLATEBNÍ PODMÍNKY
 6.1. Orientační dostupnost zboží je uvedena v detailu daného zboží. Dodací lhůta činí u zboží skladem zpravidla 24 hodin (v pracovních dnech) od expedice zboží, o které bude kupující v den expedice vyrozuměn prodávajícím odesláním e-mailu obsahujícího číslo balíku (zásilky) na e-mail kupujícího.
 6.2. V případě dotazu na konkrétní dostupnost zboží se kupující může obrátit na prodávajícího na kontakt uvedený na webové stránce www.jrc.cz/kontakty/t-154.
 6.3. Prodávající dodává zboží pouze v rámci České republiky.
 6.4. Kupující je při objednávce povinen vyplnit (uvést) své telefonní číslo, doručovatel – kurýr bude kupujícího kontaktovat o konkrétním termínu doručení; kupující je povinen zabezpečit převzetí v místě doručení. Změny podmínek doručení (místa nebo času) je možné činit po domluvě s kurýrem nebo na zákaznické lince příslušné doručovací společnosti, vždy dle podmínek doručovací společnosti.
 6.5. Objednané zboží je možné vyzvednout osobně v sídle prodávajícího, a to na adrese JRC Czech a.s., Naskové 3, Praha 5, 150 00 nebo na jím zvolené prodejně prodávajícího, jejichž aktuální seznam je uveden na webové stránce prodávajícího www.jrc.cz/prodejny. Zboží je připraveno po dobu 2 pracovních dnů od oznámení o připravení objednávky; o připravenosti objednaného zboží je kupující vyrozuměn e-mailem, telefonicky nebo SMS zprávou.
 6.6. Doprava a platba: Způsob dodání a platby si volí kupující v rámci své objednávky a tyto jsou kupujícímu k dispozici před uzavřením kupní smlouvy. Způsoby platby a dodací podmínky jsou uvedeny na internetových stránkách https://www.jrc.cz/jak-nakupovat/t-157/.
 6.7. Při platbě zboží bankovním převodem ze zahraničního účtu nebo jiným způsobem, s nímž jsou spojeny zvláštní poplatky, nese veškeré poplatky či náklady spojené s transakcí kupující.
 6.8. Podle zákona o evidenci tržeb je prodávající povinen vystavit kupujícímu účtenku a zároveň je povinen zaevidovat přijatou tržbu u správce daně online; v případě technického výpadku pak nejpozději do 48 hodin. Kupující výslovně souhlasí s možností zaslání daňového dokladu v elektronické podobě (namísto dokladu v písemné formě) na jeho emailovou adresu.
 6.9. Využitím platební metody „Twisto“ zprostředkované Prodávajícím a poskytované společností Twisto payments a.s., IČO: 01615165, zapsané v obchodním rejstříku vedeném Městským soudem v Praze, oddíl B, vložka 19085, se sídlem na adrese Újezd 450/40, Malá Strana, 118 00 Praha 1, Kupující bere na vědomí a souhlasí se „Všeobecnými obchodními podmínkami Twisto“ https://www.twisto.cz/podminky/, a dále bere na vědomí „Pravidla pro zpracování osobních údajů“ společnosti Twisto https://www.twisto.cz/podminky/zpracovavani-udaju, a Kupující výslovně souhlasí s postoupením pohledávky Prodávajícího na uhrazení celkové kupní ceny (včetně případných nákladů na dopravu a dalších nákladů) objednaného zboží a/nebo služeb na společnost Twisto.
 6.10. V případě, že je způsob dopravy smluven na základě zvláštního požadavku kupujícího, nese kupující riziko a případné dodatečné náklady spojené s tímto způsobem dopravy.
 6.11. Při převzetí zboží od přepravce je kupující povinen zkontrolovat neporušenost obalů zboží a v případě jakýchkoliv závad toto neprodleně oznámit přepravci. V případě shledání porušení obalu svědčícího o neoprávněném vniknutí do zásilky nemusí kupující zásilku od přepravce převzít. Podpisem dodacího listu kupující stvrzuje, že zásilka zboží splňovala všechny podmínky a náležitosti a na případnou pozdější reklamaci ohledně porušení obalu zásilky nemůže být brán zřetel. Kupující nabývá vlastnické právo ke zboží úplným zaplacením jeho kupní ceny prodávajícímu a jeho převzetím.
 6.12. V případě vyzvednutí objednávky, jež byla uhrazena předem prostřednictvím internetu, může prodávající či její smluvní partner požadovat předložení identifikačního průkazu kupujícího (OP nebo cestovní pas), a to za účelem předcházení vzniku škod a zamezení legalizace výnosů pocházející z trestné činnosti. Bez předložení některého z těchto dokladů může prodávajíc či její smluvní partner odmítnout zboží vydat. Toto oprávnění prodávajícího vyplývá s ust. § 2900 občanského zákoníku, dle kterého vyžadují-li to okolnosti případu nebo zvyklosti soukromého života, je každý povinen si při svém konání počínat tak, aby nedošlo k nedůvodné újmě na vlastnictví jiného.
 7. ODSTOUPENÍ OD SMLOUVY
 7.1. Nejedná-li se o případ uvedený v čl. 6.1 písm. e. obchodních podmínek či o jiný případ, kdy nelze od smlouvy odstoupit, má kupující v souladu s ustanovením § 1829 odst. 1 občanského zákoníku právo od smlouvy odstoupit.
 7.2. Kupující má právo od smlouvy uzavřené prostřednictvím nákupu v e-shopu odstoupit bez udání důvodu ve lhůtě 14 dnů. V případě uzavření kupní smlouvy běží 14denní lhůta ode dne následujícího po dni, kdy kupující nebo kupujícím určená třetí osoba (jiná než dopravce) převezme zboží. V případě uzavření smlouvy, jejímž předmětem je několik druhů zboží nebo dodání několika částí zboží běží 14denní lhůta ode dne následujícího po dni, kdy kupující nebo kupujícím určená třetí osoba (jiná než dopravce) převezme poslední dodávku zboží.
 7.3. Pro účely uplatnění práva na odstoupení od smlouvy musí kupující o svém odstoupení informovat prodávajícího, u něhož bylo zboží objednáno, a to formou jednostranného právního jednání (například dopisem zaslaným prostřednictvím provozovatele poštovních služeb, faxem nebo e-mailem); kupující je při odstoupení povinen prokázat, nejlépe doložením kopie kupního dokladu (faktury, účtenky, dodacího listu) zakoupení věci, v případě, že kupující takový doklad nemá, musí vznik kupní smlouvy prokázat jiným dostatečně věrohodným způsobem (např. výpisem z účtu či platební karty). Kupující může též použít vzorový formulář pro odstoupení od smlouvy, nacházející se na těchto webových stránkách; použití vzorového formuláře pro odstoupení od smlouvy však není pro spotřebitele povinné.
 7.4. Aby byla dodržena lhůta pro odstoupení od uzavřené kupní smlouvy, postačuje, aby odstoupení od smlouvy bylo prodávajícímu odesláno před uplynutím příslušné lhůty.
 7.5. Pokud kupující odstoupí od kupní smlouvy, vrátí mu prodávající bez zbytečného odkladu, nejpozději do 14 dnů ode dne, kdy prodávajícímu došlo oznámení kupujícího o odstoupení od smlouvy, všechny platby, které prodávající od spotřebitele obdržel, včetně nákladů na dodání zboží (kromě dodatečných nákladů vzniklých v důsledku spotřebitelem zvoleného způsobu dodání, který je jiný než nejlevnější způsob standardního dodání prodávajícím nabízený). Pro vrácení plateb použije prodávající stejný platební prostředek, který byl spotřebitelem použit pro provedení počáteční transakce, není-li mezi prodávajícím a kupujícím dohodnuto jinak. Prodávající vrací spotřebiteli platbu až po obdržení vráceného zboží anebo poté co spotřebitel prokáže, že zboží odeslal zpět na určenou adresu prodávajícího, a to podle toho, která ze skutečností nastane dříve.
 7.6. Kupující je povinen bez zbytečného odkladu, nebo nejpozději do 14 dnů ode dne, kdy došlo k odstoupení od kupní smlouvy, zaslat zboží obdržené na základě kupní smlouvy zpět prodávajícímu anebo mu je v téže lhůtě předat. Lhůta se považuje za zachovanou, pokud bylo zboží odesláno před uplynutím 14 dnů. Zboží musí být zabaleno ve vhodném obale (pokud možno včetně originálního obalu), musí být čisté a kompletní, tj. včetně veškerého dodaného příslušenství, s kompletní dokumentací, nepoškozené ve stavu a hodnotě, v jakém zboží převzal.
 7.7. Přímé náklady spojené s vrácením zboží nese kupující. Prodávající upozorňuje kupujícího, že pokud zboží ze své podstaty nemůže být vráceno obvyklou poštovní cestou, nese kupující přímé náklady spojené s vrácením zboží ve výši všech přímých nákladů.
 7.8. Zboží a odstoupení od smlouvy nebude akceptováno, pokud bude prodávajícímu zasláno na dobírku, bude-li nekompletní a tím anebo jakkoliv jinak nezpůsobilé k dalšímu prodeji. Je-li vrácené zboží poškozeno porušením povinností kupujícího, je prodávající oprávněn vůči kupujícímu uplatnit nárok na náhradu snížení hodnoty zboží a odečíst jej od vrácené částky.
 7.9. Kupující odpovídá prodávajícímu za snížení hodnoty zboží, které vzniklo v důsledku nakládání s tímto zbožím jinak, než je nutné s ním nakládat s ohledem na jeho povahu a vlastnosti.
 7.10. Odstoupí-li spotřebitel od smlouvy, prodávající však není povinen vrátit přijaté peněžní prostředky spotřebiteli dříve, než jí spotřebitel zboží předá nebo prokáže, že zboží prodávajícímu odeslal.
 7.11. Spotřebitel bere na vědomí skutečnost, že jsou-li se zbožím poskytovány dárky, je darovací smlouva mezi Prodávajícím a Kupujícím uzavřena s rozvazovací podmínkou, že dojde-li k využití práva odstoupit od kupní smlouvy ve lhůtě 14 dnů, darovací smlouva pozbývá účinnosti a spotřebitel je povinen spolu s vráceným zbožím vrátit i s ním související poskytnuté dárky včetně všeho, oč se obohatil. V případě, že tyto nebudou vráceny zpět, budou tyto hodnoty chápány jako bezdůvodné obohacení spotřebitele. Není-li vydání předmětu bezdůvodného obohacení dobře možné, má Prodávající právo na peněžitou náhradu ve výši obvyklé ceny. V případě odstoupení od darovací smlouvy nezaniká smlouva kupní a smlouvy jsou posuzovány z tohoto hlediska samostatně.
 7.12. Prodávající je oprávněn odstoupit od kupní smlouvy z důvodu vyprodání zásob, nedostupnosti zboží anebo tak závažné změny, které znemožnily plnění povinností prodávajícího z kupní smlouvy, anebo z důvodů vyšší moci, anebo když ani při vynaložení veškerého úsilí, které může být od něho spravedlivě požadováno, není schopný dodat zboží kupujícímu ve lhůtě anebo v ceně, která byla v kupní smlouvě sjednána.
 7.13. Prodávající je povinen o této skutečnosti bezodkladně informovat kupujícího a vrátit mu veškerá peněžitá plnění, která dosud v rámci kupní smlouvy realizoval.
 7.14. Prodávající si vyhrazuje právo odstoupit od kupní smlouvy nebo její části také v případě zjevné slovní nebo číselné chyby v množství či ceně zboží (tj. cena je zjevně jiná, než je cena pro tento typ/druh zboží obvyklá). Za zjevnou slovní nebo číselnou chybu v ceně zboží je považováno například mylné uvedení číslic, zjevně nízká cena zboží, a jiné zjevné chyby v psaní. V takovém případě bude prodávající neprodleně kontaktovat kupujícího za účelem oznámení takové skutečnosti a za účelem informování o dalším postupu. Kupující nemá nárok na náhradu škody či jinou kompenzaci. Odstoupení od smlouvy u zboží Digitální distribuce 7.15. Kupující má možnost odstoupit od smlouvy pouze v případě, že kupujícímu nebylo ještě dodáno plnění v podobě doručení aktivačního klíče nebo odkazu e-mailem. Tímto není dotčeno právo kupujícího na reklamaci zakoupeného zboží v případě nefunkčnosti zaslaného odkazu nebo aktivačního klíče. Při reklamaci se postupuje analogicky jako u reklamace fyzického zboží.
 8. SERVIS DISKU
 8.1. Servis disku je služba zaručující uvedení zakoupeného zboží zpátky do funkčního stavu, pokud dojde k jejímu poškození na straně kupujícího (např. poškrábáním disku) nebo vrácení peněz v případech, kdy to není možné.
 8.2. Aby bylo možné službu využít, musí být zakoupena na stejném dokladu jako zboží, na které se má vztahovat. Jednu zakoupenou službu lze uplatnit pouze na jednu konkrétní položku z dokladu. Službu lze využít pouze na hry na fyzických nosičích na platformy určené prodávajícím. Nelze ji jakkoli uplatnit na zboží z digitální distribuce a na zapůjčené zboží.
 8.3. Službu lze zakoupit pouze na prodejnách, u objednávek přes internetový obchod pouze u osobních odběrů placených v hotovosti na prodejně.
 8.4. Službu lze uplatnit na všechny druhy poškození, které vznikly běžným používáním. Službu lze uplatnit jedním ze tří následujících způsobů:
 i. Opravou disku v případech, kde to je možné.
 ii. Výměnou za nový nebo bazarový kus, pokud není možná oprava disku. V případě výměny za nový kus neproběhne jeho výměna okamžitě, ale bude provedena do 14 dní dnů od uplatnění služby.
 iii. Vrácením peněz za zboží (nikoliv za službu) v případě, že varianta i. ani ii. není možná.
 8.5. O tom, která z uvedených možností bude použita, rozhoduje vždy v první řadě prodávající. Službu lze uplatnit opakovaně po dobu jednoho roku v případě variant i. a ii. V případě, že bude služba uplatněna variantou iii., ji není možné opakovaně využít. Při uplatnění služby musí být disk jasně identifikovatelný, a musí být zřejmé, že se jedná o disk, ke kterému byla služba zakoupená.
 8.6. Při podezření na zneužití služby zákazníkem, například při pokusu o uplatnění na disky jiné než zakoupené v souladu s podmínkami služby, si prodávající vyhrazuje právo plnění služby v takovém případě odmítnout.
 9. BAZAR – VÝKUP POUŽITÝCH HER
 9.1. JRC Czech a.s. vykupuje použité hry platforem dle svého výběru.
 9.2. Vykupované hry musí být v prodejném stavu, musí mít obal, disk, a musí být v kompletní anglické, české, případně anglicko-české lokalizaci. V případě poškrábaného či jinak poškozeného média může být od výkupní ceny odečteno 50,- Kč za jeho opravu. JRC Czech a.s. si vyhrazuje právo kdykoliv odmítnout výkup hry bez uvedení či specifikace důvodu.
 9.3. Při výkupu je nutné se prokázat platným průkazem totožnosti: občanským průkazem, nebo cestovním pasem. Za osoby mladší 15 let smí jednat pouze jejich zákonný zástupce. Identifikační údaje smluvních stran budou zaznamenány v kupní smlouvě uzavírané vždy při každém výkupu mezi prodávajícím použité hry a JRC Czech a.s.
 9.4. Výkupní ceny podléhají změnám. Informace o výkupních cenách, akcích a možných výkupech protiúčtem je možné získat na prodejnách a webových stránkách u JRC Czech a.s.
 10. PŮJČOVNA HER
 10.1. JRC Czech a.s. provozuje službu půjčovna. Informace o této službě jsou uvedeny na internetových stránkách www.jrc.cz/pujcovna.
 11. VĚRNOSTNÍ PROGRAM
 11.1. Obchodní společnost JRC Czech a.s. nabízí svým zákazníkům věrnostní program, jehož podmínky jsou k dispozici na internetové stránce www.jrc.cz/vernost.
 11.2. Věrnostní program nabízí zákazníkům zejména možnost využívat nabízených výhod a slev formou uplatnění slevových kódů nebo nákup zboží za zvýhodněné ceny.
 12. ODPOVĚDNOST ZA VADY, ZÁRUKA
 12.1. Práva a povinnosti smluvních stran ohledně práv z vadného plnění se řídí příslušnými obecně závaznými předpisy.
 12.2. Záruční podmínky na zboží se řídí Reklamačním řádem prodávajícího, který je nedílnou součástí těchto obchodních podmínek, a příslušnými právními předpisy ČR. Reklamační řád je k dispozici na internetových stránkách. Jako záruční list obvykle slouží doklad o zakoupení (podrobnosti viz Reklamační řád).
 12.3. V případě dárkového šeku si prodávající vyhrazuje jeho odmítnutí v případě, že se jedná o dárkový šek získaný trestnou činností.
 Reklamační řád naleznete na adrese https://www.jrc.cz/reklamace/t-179/.
 13. MIMOSOUDNÍ ŘEŠENÍ SPORŮ
 13.1. Spotřebitel má ze zákona č. 378/2015 Sb. právo na mimosoudní řešení spotřebitelského sporu z kupní smlouvy nebo ze smlouvy o poskytování služeb. V případě, že dojde mezi prodávajícím a spotřebitelem ke vzniku spotřebitelského sporu z kupní smlouvy nebo ze smlouvy o poskytování služeb, který se nepodaří vyřešit vzájemnou dohodou, může spotřebitel podat návrh na mimosoudní řešení takového sporu určenému subjektu mimosoudního řešení spotřebitelských sporů, kterým je:
 Návrh na zahájení řízení může spotřebitel podat prostřednictvím webového formuláře na stránce adr.coi.cz. Spotřebitel může využít rovněž platformu pro řešení sporů online, která je zřízena Evropskou komisí na adrese ec.europa.eu/consumers/odr .
 14. ZPRACOVÁNÍ A NAKLÁDÁNÍ S OSOBNÍMI ÚDAJI
 14.1. Informace o ochraně a zpracování osobních údajů jsou k dispozici na internetových stránkách www.jrc.cz/gdpr.
 15. ZÁKAZNICKÁ LINKA, KONTAKT
 15.1. Pokud jste nenalezli požadovanou odpověď na Vaši otázku, můžete nás kontaktovat v pracovních dnech v době od 9:00 do 17:30 hodin.
 15.2. Jak nás můžete kontaktovat?
 E-mail: podpora@jrc.cz
 Aktuální kontakty dostupné na: www.jrc.cz/kontakty/t-154/
 16. ZÁVĚREČNÁ USTANOVENÍ
 16.1. Vztahy a případné spory, které vzniknou na základě kupní smlouvy, budou řešeny výhradně podle práva České republiky a budou řešeny příslušnými soudy České republiky.
 16.2. Případné spory mezi prodávajícím a kupujícím lze řešit také mimosoudní cestou. V takovém případě Kupující – spotřebitel může kontaktovat subjekt mimosoudního řešení sporu (viz výše). Nežli bude přistoupeno k mimosoudnímu řešení sporu, doporučuje prodávající kupujícímu vždy nejdříve využít kontakt na prodávajícího pro vyřešení nastalé situace.
 16.3. Smlouva je uzavírána v českém jazyce. Pokud vznikne pro potřebu kupujícího překlad textu smlouvy, platí, že v případě sporu o výklad pojmů platí výklad smlouvy v českém jazyce.
 Tyto obchodní podmínky včetně jejich součástí jsou platné a účinné od 30. 7. 2018. a ruší předchozí znění všeobecných obchodních podmínek prodávajícího včetně jejích součástí, přičemž jsou k dispozici v sídle a provozovnách prodávajícího nebo elektronicky na www.jrc.cz.
 Jak aktivovat digitál
 © 2005-2020 JRC Czech


text:
Národný cieľový kód (NDC, National Destination Code) identifikuje samostatnú geograficky určenú číslovaciu oblasť (primárna oblasť) alebo funkčne určenú číslovaciu oblasť (sieť, služba). Spolu s národným rozlišovacím číslom alebo medzinárodným rozlišovacím číslom a medzinárodným smerovým číslom tvorí telefónnu predvoľbu, ktorá sa volí pred účastníckym telefónnym číslom.
 Počas telefonovania zo zahraničia pridáme k predvoľbe +421 telefónnu predvoľbu konkrétneho mesta, v závislosti od obvodu, do ktorého voláme, ale z telefónnej predvoľby mesta vynecháme 0 a pridáme konkrétne účastnícke číslo. Všetky mestské obvody majú svoje predvoľby začínajúce 0. Ak napríklad číslo na Slovensku je 02/55667788, pri telefonovaniu zo zahraničia sa mení na +421 2 55667788 alebo 00421 2 55667788.
 Priradenie množín číslovacieho plánu verejnej telefónnej siete
 Podľa číslovacieho plánu zverejneného dňa 1. februára 2007
 PO = Primárna Oblasť
 SO = Sekundárna Oblasť
 Národné cieľové kódy geografických číslovacích oblastí verejnej telefónnej siete
 Číslovanie je platné od 1. júla 2001.
 Národný cieľový kód v mobilnej verejnej telefónnej sieti
 Pozri aj
 Telefónne číslo
 Telefónna predvoľba
 Zoznam smerových telefónnych čísiel štátov
 Referencie
 Externé odkazy
 Telekomunikačný úrad SR
 Opatrenie TÚ SR č. O-14/2007 o číslovacom pláne
 Komunikácia na Slovensku
 Telefónne čísla
 Telefónne predvoľby