text:
 Tähtis õiguslik teade
 |
 21999D0722(07)
 Euroopa Liidu Teataja L 189 , 22/07/1999 Lk 0061 - 0061
 EMP Ühiskomitee otsusnr 88/98,25. september 1998,millega muudetakse EMP lepingu II lisa (tehnilised normid, standardid, katsetamine ja sertifitseerimine)EMP ÜHISKOMITEE,võttes arvesse Euroopa Majanduspiirkonna lepingut, mida on kohandatud Euroopa Majanduspiirkonna lepingut kohandava protokolliga, edaspidi "leping", eelkõige selle artiklit 98,ning arvestades, et:lepingu II lisa muudeti EMP Ühiskomitee 31. juuli 1998. aasta otsusega nr 72/98 [1];lepingusse tuleb lisada nõukogu 22. septembri 1997. aasta direktiiv 97/57/EÜ, millega kehtestatakse taimekaitsevahendite turuleviimist käsitleva direktiivi 91/414/EMÜ VI lisa, [2]ON VASTU VÕTNUD JÄRGMISE OTSUSE:Artikkel 1Lepingu II lisa XV peatüki punktile 12a (nõukogu direktiiv 91/414/EMÜ) lisatakse järgmine taane:"— 397 L 0057: nõukogu direktiiv 97/57/EÜ, 22. september 1997 (EÜT L 265, 27.9.1997, lk 87)."Artikkel 2Nõukogu direktiivi 97/57/EÜ islandi- ja norrakeelne tekst, mis on lisatud käesoleva otsuse vastavates keeltes versioonidele, on autentne.Artikkel 3Käesolev otsus jõustub 26. septembril 1998 tingimusel, et kõik lepingu artikli 103 lõikes 1 ettenähtud teated on EMP Ühiskomiteele esitatud.Artikkel 4Käesolev otsus avaldatakse Euroopa Ühenduste Teataja EMP osas ja EMP kaasandes.Brüssel, 25. september 1998EMP Ühiskomitee nimeleesistujaN. v. Liechtenstein[1] EÜT L 172, 8.7.1999, lk 51.[2] EÜT L 265, 27.9.1997, lk 87.--------------------------------------------------


type: wikipedia

text:
Torna (, korábban Turnianske Podhradie, ) község Szlovákiában, a Kassai kerület Kassa-vidéki járásában. 1881-ig az egykori Torna vármegye székhelye.
 Fekvése
 Kassától 34 km-re délnyugatra, a Bódva jobb partján. Torna vasútállomása a Zólyom–Kassa vasútvonal mentén helyezkedik el, de egykor a is becsatlakozott az állomásra.
 Története
 A templom környékén feltárt régészeti leletek tanúsága szerint Torna területén már a bronzkorban és a vaskorban is éltek emberek. A vaskorban a település környékén bányák voltak. A honfoglalás után a Bódva és Sajó vidékén Börgér és fia Borsa szállásterülete volt. A vár és az alatta fekvő település keletkezéséről megbízható adat nem áll rendelkezésre.
 A vár és uradalma eredetileg királyi birtok volt. Az írásos források szerint közvetlenül ezt követően a Miskolc nembeli Domonkos nádorispán és királybíró birtokolta, aki a területet még III. Béla királytól kapta. Első írásos említése 1198-ban III. Ince pápa oklevelében történt. A vár és a település története a későbbiekben szorosan kapcsolódott egymáshoz. Domonkos halála után újra a királyé, majd 1243-ban IV. Béla a Bebek testvéreknek adja. 1263-ban „Torna” néven említik, neve az azonos nevű patakból származik. A várat egyes források szerint 1357-ben Tornai János fiai építették, de valószínűleg a Várhegyen már azelőtt is állt egy földvár.
 A család 1406-ban bekövetkezett kihalása után Berencsi István kapta meg, aki szintén a Tornay nevet vette fel. E család kihalása után, 1440-ban Bebek Imre lett az ura, aki 1448-ban a rigómezei csatában elesett. Ezt kihasználva még 1448-ban a husziták foglalták el, akiktől 1451-ben Hunyadi János foglalta vissza. A település 1476-ban Mátyás királytól mezővárosi rangot kapott. Birtokosai Bebek Ferenc és Imre a császár pártján álltak, később azonban Bebek Imre János király híve lett. A várat 1556-ban rövid ostrommal Dietrich és Puchheim császári vezérek foglalták el I. Ferdinánd számára, de még az évben kénytelenek voltak feladni Bebek György gömöri főispán hadainak. 1567-ben Magócsy Gáspár császári serege foglalta el és mivel ebben az évben Bebek György halálával kihalt a Bebek család, a vár is császári kézen maradt, aki a Magócsy családnak adta. 1612-ben Bethlen Gábor hadai szállták meg, de 1622-ben a bécsi békével visszakerült II. Ferdinándhoz. 1652-ben az egri török portyázók dúlták fel a települést, ugyanez megismétlődött 1675-ben is. 1678-ban a vár magyar őrsége megölte a német őrség egy részét és a kurucok kezére játszotta a várat, 1679-ben azonban Leslie tábornok visszafoglalta. 1683-ban Ibrahim pasa Thököly Imre seregeivel egyesülve szállta meg a helységet. 1685-ben Schultz császári tábornok újra elfoglalta és leromboltatta, azóta pusztul.
 A települést a Magócsyak kihalása után a Keglevich család szerezte meg, akik a 17. században kastélyt építettek ide. 1703-ban Bercsényi Miklós hadai foglalták el. 1706 decemberében Rákóczi Tornán keresztül ment Rozsnyóról Kassára, 1707-ben pedig meg is szállt a Keglevich-kastélyban. Torna 1881-ig Torna vármegye székhelye volt, amikor is azt Abaúj vármegyével egyesítették.
 A 18. század végén Vályi András így ír róla: „TORNA. Régi Vár, és Mezőváros Torna Várm. földes Ura Gr. Keglevich Uraság, mások is bírnak itten, lakosai katolikusok, fekszik dél. vólt Vára alatt, ’s Tornallyának is neveztetik, Torna vize mellett. Régi Vára meredek helyen vala, ’s az Ozmanoktól vitézűl mególtalmaztatott. Magócsi Gáspár’ idejekor, midőn e’ Várat bírta, elég ozman főket lehetett falain szemlélni. – 1678-dikban Júliusban meg ölettettek Német Őrzőji, ’s elfoglaltatott. Lesleus is sikeretlenűl ostromlotta először; lásd felőle Vágnert Histor. Leop. M. Lib. VIII. p. 556, & 560. de azután mintegy 30 óráig tartott heves ostromlása után megvette, szabad elmenetelt engedvén őrzőinek. Végre LEOPOLDnak parantsolattyára lerontattatott. Kihalván Magócsinak ága, Keglevics Miklós házasság által jutott e’ bírtokhoz, hitveséűl vévén Móricz Borbálát; Semsey Pál pedig Annát. Ez is, a’ Kir. Fiskus is bírtokát sűrgetvén a’ Várnak, kész pénzért engedtetett B. Keglevics Miklósnak több helységekkel, ’s e’ Vármegyének Fő Ispányságával egyetemben. Díszesíti e’ Várost az Uraságnak kastéllya, jeles kertye, ’s egyéb gazdasági épűletei, szép helyen épűltt Szentegyháza, és a’ Vármegye’, ’s Gyulay Uraságnak háza. – Jeles halas tó is van itten; határjának földgye középszerű, legelője elég, réttyei jók, fája van mind a’ kétféle, eladásra módgya van, posztófabrikája is van; 3 országos vásár is esik benne.”
 Fényes Elek 1851-ben kiadott geográfiai szótárában így ír a városról: „Torna, magyar mv., Abauj-Torna vmegyékben, Kassához nyugotra 5 mfldnyire, egy kies, egészséges vidéken: 1675 kath., 342 ref. és ev., 9 zsidó lak. Kath. paroch. templom. Jeles urasági kastély és kert, s halastó, melly egy malmot forgat s melly mellett egy fördő-intézet is van. Ujabb izlésü vármegyeház. Vendégfogadó. Népes országos vásárok. Földe minden gabonát s kerti veteményest jól megterem; rétjei különösen kövérek; szőlőhegye s legelője elég; erdeje pedig sok. A várostól északra egy magas kopasz sziklán láthatni régi puszta várát, mellytől kölcsönözé nevét mind a város, mind az egész megye. Első épitője hihetőleg valamellyik Bebek volt; későbben a Mágócsiakat uralta; a Mágócsiaknak ezen ága kihalván, b. Keglevich Miklós jutott birtokába, s most is a Keglevich grófi nemzetség birja a hozzá tartozó uradalommal együtt. A várat I. Leopold rontatta el. Ut. p. Rosnyó. Van 37 egész urb. telke.”
 Borovszky monográfiasorozatának Abaúj-Torna vármegyét tárgyaló része szerint: „TORNA városa, a legujabb időkig létező Tornavármegyének egykori székhelye a Bódva és a Torna völgye találkozásánál fekszik. Lakosainak száma 1468, a kik közt az 1891-iki népszámlálás 56 németet és 14 tótot talált; a többi mind magyar és túlnyomó részben katholikus. Jelenleg a tornai járás, szolgabiróság és járásbiróság székhelye. Végállomása a kassa-tornai vasútnak, melyet azonban tovább építenek. A Bódva völgyében Gömör vármegye felé, s a Sajó völgyén közvetlenül fog csatlakozni a miskolcz-füleki, ekképen a budapesti fővonalhoz. Van posta- és táviróállomása. Torna ma is élénk vásárhely, de élénkségéből sokat veszített azóta, hogy 1881-ben a megyei hatóságot az Abaujvármegyében való bekeblezés következtében feloszlatták. Házainak száma 216. Ezek közt megemlitésre méltó a régi vármegyeháza és a régi Keglevich-féle kastély, mely ma Dreher Antalé. A kastélyt csinos park veszi körül; benne egy öt hold terjedelmü tó van, mely soha sem fagy be. A társas élet ébren tartására szolgál a társaskör, vadásztársulat, nőegyesület, könyvtáregyesület. Van itt kath. népiskola, egy holdnyi faiskolával. Pénzintézete a Tornai takarékpénztár.”
 „A város északi részén, a várhegy nyúlványát képező dombon áll a régi, de teljesen átalakitott r. kath. templom, mely a XVI. században a protestánsok birtokába jutott és a katholikusok innen nem messze épitették föl ma is fennálló kis templomukat. Midőn a város a Keglevicheké lett, I. Lipót alatt a földesúr kitiltotta a protestánsokat a városból, a kik Szádelőn és Ájon telepedtek meg; a lakosságnak visszakatholizált nagyobb része pedig megint birtokába vette a templomot. A hagyomány szerint a népmondában maig is élő Herkó Páter nevü szendrői barát, hol rábeszéléssel, hol erőszakkal legnagyobb hévvel működött a visszatéritésen. A templom értékes falfestményeit az idők folyamán nagyon megrongálták. Legujabban a templomot restaurálták s a festményeket kijavitották; de eredeti szépségüket nem adhatta vissza a javitó festő.”
 A trianoni diktátumig Abaúj-Torna vármegye Tornai járásához tartozott.
 Népesség
 1880-ban 1470 lakosából 1314 magyar és 50 szlovák anyanyelvű volt.
 1890-ben 1468 lakosából 1398 magyar és 14 szlovák anyanyelvű volt.
 1900-ban 1493 lakosából 1452 magyar és 7 szlovák anyanyelvű volt.
 1910-ben 1697 lakosából 1682 magyar és 8 szlovák anyanyelvű volt.
 1921-ben 1709 lakosából 1329 magyar, 211 zsidó, 46 csehszlovák, 6 orosz, 19 egyéb nemzetiségű és 98 állampolgárság nélküli volt. Ebből 1253 római katolikus, 318 izraelita, 88 református, 32 görög katolikus, 14 evangélikus és 4 egyéb vallású volt.
 1930-ban 1727 lakosából 976 magyar, 275 csehszlovák, 187 zsidó, 107 egyéb nemzetiségű és 176 állampolgárság nélküli volt.
 1941-ben 1703 lakosából 1543 magyar és 12 szlovák volt.
 1970-ben 2663 lakosából 1615 magyar és 1035 szlovák volt.
 1980-ban 3264 lakosából 1757 magyar és 1468 szlovák volt.
 1991-ben 2737 lakosából 1745 magyar és 938 szlovák volt.
 2001-ben 3213 lakosából 1411 fő szlovák, 1400 magyar, 259 cigány. Tíz évvel korábban még a lakosság kétharmada magyar volt.
 2011-ben 3511 lakosából 1602 szlovák, 1316 magyar, 179 cigány, 11 ruszin, 7 cseh és 388 ismeretlen nemzetiségű.
 2021-ben 3700 lakosából 1793 szlovák, 1211 magyar (32,73%), 127 cigány, 9 cseh, 2 német, 2 lengyel, 2 bolgár, 1 orosz, 1 rutén, 1 egyéb nemzetiségű.
 Híres személyek
 Itt született 1674-ben gróf Gyulay Ferenc altábornagy
 Itt született Cörver Elek
 Itt született Cörver Nepomuk János
 Nevezetességei
 A falutól északra emelkedő 366 m magas hegyen állnak Torna várának romjai.
 A várrom közelében épült fel a 17. században a reneszánsz Keglevich-várkastély, amelyet 1950-55 között rendbe hoztak. A kastély területének déli részén díszpark és halastó található.
 A Nagyboldogasszony tiszteletére szentelt, 14. századi gótikus templomában korabeli freskók találhatók. Harangja szintén 14. századi. A kórus alatt egy reneszánsz stílusú, valószínűleg 1600-ból származó sírfelirat látható.
 Gömör-Tornai Nyár fesztivál.
 Jegyzetek
 További információk
 Hivatalos oldal
 Községinfó
 Torna Szlovákia térképén
 Torna – Turňa nad Bodvou
 Tornai Polgár Info – Független hírportál
 E-obce.sk
 A Kassa-vidéki járás települései
 Abaúj-Torna vármegye települései


type: caselaw

jurisdiction: EU

text:
 10.11.2012
 CS
 Úřední věstník Evropské unie
 C 343/15
 Rozsudek Tribunálu ze dne 21. září 2012 — Wesergold Getränkeindustrie v. OHIM — Lidl Stiftung (WESTERN GOLD)
 (Věc T-278/10) (1)
 (Ochranná známka Společenství - Námitkové řízení - Přihláška slovní ochranné známky Společenství WESTERN GOLD - Starší národní slovní ochranné známky WESERGOLD, starší mezinárodní slovní ochranná známka Wesergold, starší národní slovní ochranná známka WeserGold a starší slovní ochranná známka Společenství WeserGold - Relativní důvody pro zamítnutí - Neexistence nebezpečí záměny - Článek 8 odst. 1 písm. b) nařízení (ES) č. 207/2009 - Rozlišovací způsobilost starších ochranných známek)
 2012/C 343/23
 Jednací jazyk: němčina
 Účastníci řízení
 Žalobkyně: Wesergold Getränkeindustrie GmbH & Co. KG (Rinteln, Německo) (zástupci: P. Goldenbaum, T. Melchert a I. Rohr, advokáti)
 Žalovaný: Úřad pro harmonizaci na vnitřním trhu (ochranné známky a vzory) (zástupce: R. Pethke, zmocněnec)
 Další účastnice řízení před odvolacím senátem OHIM, vystupující jako vedlejší účastnice řízení před Tribunálem: Lidl Stiftung & Co. KG (Neckarsulm, Německo) (zástupci: A. Marx a M. Schaeffer, advokáti)
 Předmět věci
 Žaloba podaná proti rozhodnutí prvního odvolacího senátu OHIM ze dne 24. března 2010 (věc R 770/2009-1), týkajícímu se námitkového řízení mezi společnostmi Wesergold Getränkeindustrie GmbH & Co. KG a Lidl Stiftung & Co. KG.
 Výrok
 1)
 Rozhodnutí prvního odvolacího senátu Úřadu pro harmonizaci na vnitřním trhu (ochranné známky a vzory) (OHIM) ze dne 24. března 2010 (věc R 770/2009-1) se zrušuje.
 2)
 OHIM ponese vlastní náklady řízení a nahradí náklady řízení vynaložené společností Wesergold Getränkeindustrie GmbH & Co. KG.
 3)
 Společnost Lidl Stiftung & Co. KG ponese vlastní náklady řízení.
 (1) Úř. věst. C 221, 14.8.2010.


text:
 21.11.2009
 MT
 Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali tal-Unjoni Ewropea
 C 282/46
 Digriet tal-Qorti tal-Prim’Istanza tal-24 ta’ Settembru 2009 — SBS TV u SBS Danish Television vs Il-Kummissjoni
 (Kawża T-12/05) (1)
 (“Għajnuna mill-Istat - Kapitalizzazzjoni mill-ġdid ta’ xandar pubbliku wara l-ewwel deċiżjoni li ordnat l-irkupru ta’ għajnuna mill-Istat li kienet inkompatibbli - Deċiżjoni li ma jitqajmux oġġezzjonijiet - Annullament tal-ewwel deċiżjoni - M’hemmx lok li tingħata deċiżjoni”)
 2009/C 282/88
 Lingwa tal-kawża: L-Ingliż
 Partijiet
 Rikorrenti: SBS TV A/S, preċedentement TV Danmark A/S (Skovlunde, id-Danimarka); u SBS Danish Television Ltd, preċedentement Kanal 5 Denmark Ltd (Hounslow, Middlesex, ir-Renju Unit) (rappreżentanti: inizjalment, D. Vandermeersch, T. Müller-Ibold, K. Nordlander u H. Peytz, u sussegwentement D. Vandermeersch, H. Peytz u K.-U. Karl, avukati)
 Konvenuta: Il-Kummissjoni tal-Komunitajiet Ewropej (rappreżentanti: N. Khan u M. Niejahr, aġenti)
 Intervenjenti insostenn tar-rikorrenti: Viasat Broadcasting UK Ltd (West Drayton, Middlesex, ir-Renju Unit) (rappreżentanti: S. Hjelmborg u M. Honoré, avukati)
 Intervenjenti insostenn tal-konvenuta: Ir-Renju tad-Danimarka (rappreżentanti: J. Molde, aġent, assistit minn P. Biering, K. Lundgaard Hansen, avukati); u TV 2/Danmark A/S (Odense, id-Danimarka) (rappreżentanti: O. Koktvedgaard u M. Thorninger, avukati)
 Suġġett
 Talba għall-annullament tad-Deċiżjoni C (2004) 3632 finali tal-Kummissjoni, tas-6 ta’ Ottubru 2004, dwar il-kapitalizzazzjoni mill-ġdid ta’ TV 2/Danmark A/S.
 Dispożittiv
 (1)
 Ma għadx hemm lok li tingħata deċiżjoni dwar dan ir-rikors.
 (2)
 Kull parti hija kkundannata għall-ispejjeż tagħha.
 (1) ĠU C 69, 19.3.2005.


text:
 5.9.2016
 ES
 Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea
 C 326/19
 Auto del Presidente de la Sala Séptima del Tribunal de Justicia de 1 de junio de 2016 — The National Iranian Gas Company/Consejo de la Unión Europea
 (Asunto C-359/15 P) (1)
 (2016/C 326/33)
 Lengua de procedimiento: francés
 El Presidente de la Sala Séptima del Tribunal de Justicia ha resuelto archivar el asunto.
 (1) DO C 294 de 7.9.2015.


text:
Grupp 7 taż-Żona Ewropea tal-kwalifikazzjoni għat-Tazza tad-Dinja 2010 kien grupp ta' kwalifikazzjoni tal-UEFA għat-Tazza tad-Dinja 2010. Il-grupp kien kompost minn Franza, ir-Rumanija, is-Serbja, il-Litwanja, l-Awstrija u l-Gżejjer Faroe.
 Il-grupp ġie mirbuħ mis-Serbja, li b'hekk ikkwalifikat direttament għat-Tazza tad-Dinja. Franza, minħabba li spiċċat it-tieni, ħadet sehem fil-partiti ta' spareġġ.
 Klassifika
 Riżultati

 L-aqwa skorers
 F'dan il-grupp ġew skorjati 81 gowl fi 30 logħba, b'medja ta' 2.7 gowls kull logħba.
 Attendenzi
 UEFA Grupp 7


text:
Karol Antolík (* 28. január 1843, Studenec – † 20. jún 1905, Bratislava) bol slovenský lekár a fyzik.
 Rodina
 Otec: Martin Antolik
 Matka: Zuzana rod. Benašková
 Život
 Karol Antolík sa narodil v Studenci. Študoval na gymnáziách v Levoči, Prešove a Veľkom Varadíne, matematiku a fyziku na budapeštianskej univerzite, kde jeho učiteľmi boli Š. A. Jedlík a O. Pecval. Najmä prvý z nich mal na jeho neskoršiu vedeckú dráhu mimoriadny vplyv tak výberom predmetu výskumu ako aj experimentálnym zameraním. Absolvoval aj ročný študijný pobyt na nemeckých univerzitách, o. i. v Berlíne pracoval v Helmholtzových laboratóriách a v Heidelbergu navštevoval prednášky R. W. Bunsena a G. H. Quinckeho. Pôsobil ako profesor na stredných školách v Kaposvári, Košiciach, Arade a napokon v Bratislave, kde bol od roku 1893 až do svojej smrti aj riaditeľom reálky.
 Práca
 Venoval sa experimentálnemu skúmaniu elektrického iskrového výboja, spočiatku najmä metódou Lichtenbergových obrazcov, neskôr vlastnou originálnou metodikou. Dráhu kĺzavého iskrového výboja zachytával na začadenom povrchu sklenej doštičky, príp. iných telies a zo zanechaných stôp výboja sa pokúšal vysvetliť niektoré vlastnosti elektrickej iskry. Výsledky svojich pokusov publikoval aj v známom Poggendorffovom fyzikálnom časopise Annalen der Physik, kde upútali pozornosť Ernsta Macha a jeho spolupracovníkov. E. Mach v Antolíkovej metóde objavil možnosť využitia k akustickým výskumom, a tak pokusy zručného stredoškolského profesora sa stali východiskom viacročnej série experimentov s explóziami, ktoré prostredníctvom skúmania rázových vĺn doviedli Macha k viacerým dôležitým objavom modernej aerodynamiky. K. Antolík sa neskôr stal umelcom Lichtenbergových obrazcov a venoval sa aj iným pokusom z oblasti elektrostatiky a akustiky. Pozoruhodné sú jeho výsledky, ktoré dosahoval pri skúmaní chvenia napnutých blán (membrán) rôznymi modifikáciami Chladniho metódy zvukových obrazcov. Okrem celého radu štúdií bol autorom učebnice experimentálnej fyziky a zbierky demonštračných pokusov.
 Externé odkazy
 Záznam o narodení a krste v matrike riadok 9 - farnosť Spišská Kapitula
 Slovenskí fyzici
 Osobnosti zo Studenca


type: contracts

text:
 Avis juridique important
 |
 21997A0520(03)
 Additional Protocol to the Europe Agreement on trade in textile products between the European Community and the Republic of Poland
 Official Journal L 127 , 20/05/1997 P. 0140 - 0196
 ADDITIONAL PROTOCOL to the Europe Agreement on trade in textile products between the European Community and the Republic of PolandTHE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,of the one part, andTHE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF POLAND,of the other part,DESIRING to promote, with a view to permanent cooperation and in conditions providing the utmost security for trade, the mutual expansion and orderly and equitable development of trade in textile products between the European Community (hereinafter the 'Community`) and the Republic of Poland (hereinafter 'Poland`);RESOLVED to take the fullest possible account of the serious economic and social problems at present affecting the textile industry in both importing and exporting countries, in particular in order to eliminate the real dangers of damage to both the Community and Polish markets for textile products;BEARING IN MIND the objectives of the Europe Agreement between the Community and Poland signed in Brussels on 16 December 1991 and, in particular, those referred to in Article 1 thereof;HAVING REGARD to the Europe Agreement and in particular Article 15 thereof,HAVING REGARD to the Interim Agreement between the Community and Poland signed in Brussels on 16 December 1991 and in particular to Article 9 thereof,HAVING REGARD to Protocol No 1 on textile and clothing products to the Europe Agreement and to the Interim Agreement, and in particular to Article 3 thereof,HAVE DECIDED to conclude this Protocol and to this end have designated as their plenipotentiaries:THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION:Johannes Friedrich BESELERDeputy Director-General of the Directorate-General for External Economic Relations of the Commission of the European CommunitiesTHE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF POLANDJan TRUSZCZYNSKIAmbassador extraordinary and plenipotentiary,Head of the Mission of the Republic of Poland to the European UnionWHO HAVE AGREED AS FOLLOWS:Article 11. The further development of trade and industrial cooperation between the textile and clothing industries in the Community and in Poland is an underlying principle of this Protocol which establishes the quantitative arrangements applicable to trade in textile and clothing products (hereinafter 'textile products`) originating in Poland and in the Community, which are listed in Annex I to this Protocol.2. Under the terms of this Protocol, all quantitative restrictions and measures of equivalent effect on imports in both Parties on textile products originating in the other Party, shall be eliminated at the end of the period referred to in Agreed Minute No 5.3. Consultations will be held during the third year of application of this Protocol on the global situation and progress towards final liberalization.Article 21. The classification of the products covered by this Protocol is based on the tariff and statistical nomenclature of the Community (hereinafter called the 'combined nomenclature` or, in abbreviated form, 'CN`) and any amendments thereof.2. The Parties agree that the introduction of changes, such as changes in practices, rules, procedures and categorization of textile products, including those changes relating to the Harmonized System and the combined nomenclature, in the implementation or administration of those restrictions applied under this Protocol, should not affect the balance of rights and obligations between the Parties under this Protocol, adversely affect the access available to a Party, impede the full utilization of such access, or disrupt trade under this Protocol. The Party initiating any such changes shall inform the other Party before their entry into force.The procedures for implementation of classification changes are set out in Appendix A.3. The origin of the products covered by this Protocol shall be determined in accordance with the rules of origin in force in the Community.Poland shall be notified of any amendments to the said rules of origin.The procedures for checking the origin of the textile products are laid down in Appendix A.Article 31. Poland hereby agrees for each of the years of the Protocol's application to restrain its exports to the Community of the products included in Annex II to the limits set out therein.2. The number and level of quantitative restrictions applied to direct imports of textile products, expressed in terms of CN codes, of Community origin into Poland for each year of the Protocol's application are listed in Annex III to this Protocol.3. Unless it is otherwise provided for in this Protocol, Poland and the Community hereby agree not to introduce new quantitative restrictions or measures of equivalent effect, on trade in textile products between the two Parties, and not to increase the number of existing ones as compared to those in force on 31 December 1992.4. Exports to the Community of textile products listed in Annex II and originating in Poland shall be subject to a double-checking system as specified in Appendix A.Article 41. Poland and the Community recognize the special and differential character of reimports of textile products into the Community after processing, manufacturing or working in Poland as a specific form of industrial and trade cooperation.2. Save where it is otherwise provided for in Appendix B, such reimports into the Community shall not be subject to the quantitative limits of the products established in Annex II, provided that they are effected in accordance with the regulations on economic outward processing traffic in force in the Community and are eligible for the specific arrangements laid down in Appendix B to this Protocol.3. No restrictions apply to imports into Poland of textile products of Community origin destined for re-export after having undergone inward processing operations in Poland.Article 51. Imports into either of the Parties of textile products covered by this Protocol shall not be subject to the quantitative limits established in Annex II or Annex III, provided that they are declared to be for re-export from the importing Party in the same state or after processing, under the administrative system of control existing in the Parties.However, the release for home use of products imported into the Community under the conditions referred to above shall be subject to the production of an export licence issued by the competent authorities, and to proof of origin in accordance with Appendix A.2. Where the competent authorities in one Party have evidence that imports of textile products have been set off against a quantitative limit established under this Protocol, but that the products have subsequently been re-exported from that Party, the authorities concerned shall inform the authorities of the other Party within four weeks of the quantities involved and shall authorize imports of the same quantities of identical category of product, which shall not be set off against the quantitative limit established under this Protocol for the current or following year, as appropriate.3. Exports of both Parties of cottage industry fabrics woven on hand- or foot-operated looms, garments or other made up articles obtained manually from such fabrics, and of traditional folklore handicraft products shall not be subject to quantitative limits. However, exports of these products originating in Poland must meet the conditions laid down in Appendix C to this Protocol.Article 61. In any year, advance use of a portion of the quantitative limit established in Annex II for the following year shall be authorized for each category of products up to 6 % of the quantitative limit for the current year.Amounts delivered in advance shall be deducted from the corresponding quantitative limit established for the following year.2. Carry-over to the corresponding quantitative limit for the following year of amounts not used during any given Protocol year shall be authorized up to 10 % of the quantitative limit for the current year for the quantitative limits established in Annex II.3. In the case of Group I, transfers shall be allowed only in the following cases:- amounts may be transferred from category 1 to categories 2 and 3, or from categories 2 and 3 to category 1 up to 7 % of the quantitative limit for the category to which the transfer is made,- amounts may be transferred between categories 2 and 3 up to 7 % of the quantitative limit for the category to which the transfer is made,- the total quantities transferred to categories 2 and 3 in accordance with the first two indents of this paragraph may not exceed 7 % of the category to which the transfer is made,- amounts may be transferred between categories 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 up to 7 % of the quantitative limit for the category to which the transfer is made.Amounts may be transferred into any category in Groups II and III from any category in Groups I, II and III up to 10 % of the quantitative limit for the category to which the transfer is made.4. The table of equivalence applicable to the transfers referred to in paragraph 3 is given in Annex I.5. The increase in any given category of products resulting from the cumulative application of the provisions in paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 during a single year must not exceed the limits of 17 % for categories of products in Groups I, II and III.6. The authorities of the exporting Party must notify the other Party of any recourse to the provisions of paragraphs 1, 2 and 3, at least 15 days in advance.Article 71. Should one Party consider that imports of textile products not subject to quantitative limits, originating in the other Party and covered by this Protocol take place in such increased, absolute or relative, quantities and under such conditions, so as to threaten to cause injury to the importing Party's production of like or directly competitive products, or where the economic interests of the importing Party so require, it may impose a prior or retrospective surveillance system on the category of products concerned for a period that it considers appropriate.2. The Party that intends to introduce a surveillance system under paragraph 1 shall inform at least one working day in advance of its introduction the other Party, and consultations may be requested by either Party under Article 14 of this Protocol.3. Where a surveillance system is established under this Article by the Community, the relevant provisions on double-checking, classification and certification of origin laid down in Appendix A shall be applied by Poland, as appropriate.Article 81. Exports of textile products to either Party which are not subject to quantitative limits, may be made subject to quantitative limits in accordance with the following paragraphs.2. Should one Party consider that imports of textile products originating in the other Party and covered by this Protocol take place in such increased quantities, or under such conditions, so as to cause serious damage or actual threat thereof, to the importing Party's production of like or directly competitive products, it may request consultations under Article 14 of this Protocol with a view to reaching agreement on an appropriate quantitative limit for the textile category in question.The quantitative limits agreed upon may in no case be lower than 110 % of the level of the importing Party's imports during the 12-month period terminating two months, or where data is not available three months, preceding the month in which the request for consultation is made, of products in that category originating in the other Party.3. In critical circumstances where delay would cause damage difficult to repair, action may be taken provisionally by the importing Party on the condition that the request for consultations shall be effected immediately afterwards. This action shall take the form of a quantitative restraint on Polish exports to, or imports from, the Community, for a provisional three-month period starting from the date of the request. Such a provisional limit shall be set at 25 %, at least, of the level of imports or exports during the 12-month period terminating two months, or where data is not available three months, preceding the month in which the request for consultation is made.4. Should the consultations not lead to an agreed solution within one month then the provisional restraint referred to in paragraph 3 can be either renewed for a further three-month period pending further consultations, or made definitive at an annual level not lower than 110 % of the imports for the 12-month period terminating two months, or where data is not available three months, preceding the month in which the request for consultation is made.5. Where paragraphs 2, 3 or 4 are applied, either Party shall authorize imports belonging to the textile category of products in question, which were shipped from the other Party before the submission of the request for consultation.Where paragraphs 2, 3 or 4 are applied, the Party concerned undertakes to issue export or import licences for products covered by contracts effectively concluded before the introduction of the quantitative limit, but up to the volume of the quantitative limit fixed.6. The duration of the measure and the annual growth rates to be applied to any quantitative limit introduced under this Article shall be decided when introducing the measure.7. The provisions of this Protocol which concern exports of products subject to the quantitative limits established in Annex II or Annex III shall also apply to products for which quantitative limits are introduced under this Article.8. Measures invoked pursuant to the provisions of this Article can in no case remain in force after the period for the elimination of all quantitative restrictions, and measures of equivalent effect, laid down in this Protocol, has elapsed.Article 9Nothing in this Protocol prevents a Party from unilaterally removing a quantitative limitation or increasing the level of access under a limitation, should the conditions in its market so permit.Article 101. Poland undertakes to supply the community with precise statistical information on all export and import licences issued by the Polish authorities for all categories of textile products subject to the quantitative limits established under this Protocol, and on all certificates issued by the Polish authorities for all products referred to in Article 5 (3), which are covered by the provisions of Appendix C to this Protocol.The Community shall similarly transmit to the Polish authorities precise statistical information on import authorizations issued by the Community authorities in connection with the export licences and the certificates issued by Poland.2. For all categories of products, the information referred to in paragraph 1 shall be transmitted by the end of the month following the month to which the statistics relate.3. The Parties undertake to provide each other's authorities, by 15 April of each calendar year, with the preceding year's statistics on imports of all textile products covered by this Protocol.Either Party shall, at the other Party's request, transmit available statistical information on all exports of textile products covered by this Protocol.The Parties shall transmit to each other's authorities statistical information on the products covered by Article 5 (1).4. For all categories of products the information referred to in paragraph 3 shall be transmitted by the end of the third month following the quarter of the year to which the statistics relate.5. Should it be found, on analysis of the information exchanged, that there are significant discrepancies in the statistics between the returns for exports and those for imports, consultations may be held in accordance with the procedure specified in Article 14 of this Protocol.Article 111. In view of ensuring the effective functioning of this Protocol between Poland and the Community, the Parties agree to cooperate fully in order to prevent, to investigate and to take any necessary legal and/or administrative action against circumvention by transhipment, re-routing, false declaration concerning country or place of origin, falsification of documents, false declaration concerning fibre content, quantities, description or classification of merchandise and by whatever other means. Accordingly, Poland and the Community agree to establish the necessary legal provisions and administrative procedures permitting effective action to be taken against such circumvention, which shall include the adoption of legally binding corrective measures against exporters and/or importers involved.2. Should either Party believe on the basis of information available that the present Protocol is being circumvented, that Party will consult with the other Party with a view to reaching a mutually satisfactory solution. These consultations will be held as early as possible and at the latest within 30 days from the date of request.3. Pending the results of the consultations referred to in paragraph 2, either Party shall, as a precautionary measure, if so requested by the other Party, take all necessary measures to ensure that, where sufficient evidence of circumvention is provided, adjustments of quantitative limits liable to be agreed following the consultations referred to in paragraph 2, may be carried out for the quota year in which the request to open consultations in accordance with paragraph 2 was made, or for the following year if the quota for the current year is exhausted.4. Should the Parties be unable, in the course of the consultation referred to in paragraph 2, to reach a mutually satisfactory solution, the initiating Party shall have the right:(a) where there is sufficient evidence that products originating in the other Party have been imported in circumvention of the present Protocol, to set off the relevant quantities against the quantitative limits established under the Protocol;(b) where sufficient evidence shows that false declaration concerning fibre content, quantities, description or classification of products originating in the other Party has occurred, to refuse to import the products in question;(c) should it appear that the territory of the other Party is involved in transhipment or re-routing of products not originating in that Party, to introduce quantitative limits against the same products originating in the other Party if they are not already subject to quantitative limits, or to take any other appropriate measures.5. Without prejudice to Protocol No 6 on mutual assistance in customs matters to the Europe Agreement, the Parties agree to establish a system of administrative cooperation to prevent and to address effectively all problems arising from circumvention in accordance with the provisions of Appendix A of this Protocol.Article 121. The quantitative limits established under this Protocol on imports into the Community of textile products of Polish origin will not be broken down by the Community into regional shares.2. The Parties shall cooperate in order to prevent sudden and prejudicial changes in traditional trade flows resulting in regional concentration of direct imports into the Community.3. Poland shall monitor its exports of products under restraint or surveillance into the Community. Should a sudden and prejudicial change in traditional trade flows arise, the Community will be entitled to request consultations in order to find a satisfactory solution to those problems. Such consultations must be held within 15 working days of their being requested by the Community.4. Poland shall endeavour to ensure that exports of textile products subject to quantitative limits into the Community are spaced out as evenly as possible over the year, due account being taken in particular of seasonal factors.Article 131. The Parties shall refrain from discrimination in the allocation of the export licences and import authorizations or documents referred to in Appendices A and C.2. Should either Party find that the application of this Protocol or the commercial practices of either Party are disturbing existing commercial relations between the Community and Poland consultations shall be started promptly, in accordance with the procedure specified in Article 14, with a view to remedying this situation.Article 141. Save where it is otherwise provided, the special consultation procedures referred to in this Protocol shall be governed by the following rules:- any request for consultations shall be notified in writing to the other Party,- the request for consultation shall be followed within 15 days of the notification by a statement setting out the reasons and circumstances which, in the opinion of the requesting Party, justify the submission of such a request,- the Parties shall enter into consultations within one month of notification of the request at the latest, with a view to reaching agreement or a mutually acceptable conclusion within one further month at the latest.2. If necessary, at the request of either of the Parties, consultations shall be held on any problems arising from the application of this Protocol. Any consultations held under this Article shall take place in a spirit of cooperation and with a desire to reconcile the differences between the Parties.Article 151. This Protocol shall enter into force on the first day of the month following the date on which the Parties notify each other of the completion of the procedures necessary for that purpose. This Protocol shall apply with effect from 1 January 1993. It shall expire at the end of the period referred to in Agreed Minute No 5.2. Either Party may at any time propose consultations in accordance with Article 14, with a view to agreeing amendments to this Protocol.3. Either Party may, at any time, denounce this Protocol by notifying the other Party. This Protocol shall cease to apply six months after the date of such notification and the quantitative limits established under this Protocol shall be reduced proportionately.4. The Annexes, Appendices, Agreed Minutes and Joint Memoranda attached to this Protocol shall form an integral part thereof.5. This Protocol shall form an integral part of the Europe Agreement between the Community and Poland, signed on 16 December 1991 and of the Interim Agreement signed between the Parties on the same date.Article 16This Protocol shall be drawn up in two copies in the Danish, Dutch, English, Finnish, French, German, Greek, Italian, Portuguese, Spanish, Swedish and Polish languages, each of those texts being equally authentic.Hecho en Bruselas, el cuatro de marzo de mil novecientos noventa y siete.Udfærdiget i Bruxelles, den fjerde marts nitten hundrede og syvoghalvfems.Geschehen zu Brüssel am vierten März neunzehnhundertsiebenundneunzig. ̧ãéíå óôéò ÂñõîÝëëåò, óôéò ôÝóóåñéò Ìáñôßïõ ÷ßëéá åííéáêüóéá åíåíÞíôá åðôÜ.Done at Brussels on the fourth day of March in the year one thousand nine hundred and ninety-seven.Fait à Bruxelles, le quatre mars mil neuf cent quatre-vingt-dix-sept.Fatto a Bruxelles, addì quattro marzo millenovecentonovantasette.Gedaan te Brussel, de vierde maart negentienhonderd zevenennegentig.Feito em Bruxelas, em quatro de Março de mil novecentos e noventa e sete.Tehty Brysselissä neljäntenä päivänä maaliskuuta vuonna tuhatyhdeksänsataayhdeksänkymmentäseitsemän.Som skedde i Bryssel den fjärde mars nittonhundranittiosju.Sporz Nadzono w Brukseli, dnia czwartego marca tysi Nac dziewi Ne ́cset dziewi Ne ́cdziesi Natego siódmego roku.Por la Comunidad EuropeaFor Det Europæiske FællesskabFür die Europäische GemeinschaftÃéá ôçí ÅõñùðáúêÞ ÊïéíüôçôáFor the European CommunityPour la Communauté européennePer la Comunità europeaVoor de Europese GemeenschapPela Comunidade EuropeiaEuroopan yhteisön puolestaPå Europeiska gemenskapens vägnar>REFERENCE TO A GRAPHIC>Za Rz Nad Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej>REFERENCE TO A GRAPHIC>ANNEX I PRODUCTS REFERRED TO IN ARTICLE 1 (1) 1. When the constitutive material of the products of categories 1 to 114 is not specifically mentioned, these products are to be taken to be made exclusively of wool or of fine hair, of cotton or of man-made fibres.2. Garments which are not recognizable as being garments for men or boys or as being garments for women or girls are classified with the latter.3. Where the expression 'babies' garments` is used, this is meant to cover garments up to and including commercial size 86.>TABLE>>TABLE>>TABLE>>TABLE>>TABLE>>TABLE>>TABLE>ANNEX II (The full product descriptions of the categories listed in this annex are to be found in Annex I)>TABLE>ANNEX III On the date of initialling the Protocol, Poland has no quantitative restrictions or measures of equivalent effect on imports of textile products originating in the Community.Appendix A TITLE I CLASSIFICATION Article 11. The competent authorities of the Community undertake to inform Poland of any changes in the combined nomenclature (CN) before the date of their entry into force in the Community.2. The competent authorities of the Community shall inform the competent authorities of Poland of any decisions relating to the classification of products subject to the present Protocol, within one month of their adoption at the latest. Such communication shall include:(a) a description of the products concerned;(b) the relevant category, related CN codes;(c) the reasons which have led to the decision.3. Where a classification decision results in a change of classification practice or a change in category of any product subject to the present Protocol, the affected products shall follow the trade regime applicable to the practice or category they fall into after such change, as provided for in this Protocol. Any such decision shall enter into force 30 days after it has been notified to the other Party.The Contracting Parties agree to enter into consultation in accordance with the procedures described in Article 14 of the Protocol with a view to honouring the obligation under Article 2 (2) of the Protocol.Products shipped before the date of the application of the decision shall remain subject to the earlier classification practice, provided that the goods in question are presented for importation within 60 days of that date.4. In case of divergent opinions between Poland and the competent Community authorities at the point of entry into the Community on the classification of products covered by the present Protocol, classification shall provisionally be based on indications provided by the importing parties, pending consultations in accordance with Article 14 with a view to reaching agreement on the classification concerned. In case no agreement can be reached, the classification of the goods is to be submitted to the Nomenclature Committee for a definitive classification in the Combined Nomenclature.TITLE II ORIGIN Article 21. Products originating in Poland for export to the Community in accordance with the arrangements established by the Protocol shall be accompanied by a certificate of Polish origin conforming to the model annexed to this Appendix.2. However, products in Group III can be imported into the Community under the regime established by the Protocol on the presentation of a declaration of the exporter on the invoice or another commercial document, attesting that the products in question originate in Poland in accordance with the relevant provisions in force in the Community.3. The certificate of origin referred to in paragraph 1 is not required for the importation of goods covered by a movement certificate 'EUR 1` or a form 'EUR 2` issued in conformity with Protocol No 4 of the Europe Agreement.Article 3The certificate of origin is issued to the exporter only on receipt of a written request from either him or his representative. The competent authorities of Poland are obliged to ensure that the certificates of origin are correctly filled out; to this end they shall call for any necessary document, any evidence or carry out any check which they consider appropriate.Article 4Where different criteria for determining origin are laid down for products falling within the same category, the certificates or declarations of origin must contain a sufficiently detailed description of the goods so as to enable the criterion to be determined, on the basis of which the certificate was issued or the declaration drawn up.Article 5The discovery of slight discrepancies between details on the certificate of origin and those on the documents produced at the customs office when going through the import formalities for the goods, does not, ipso facto, cast doubt upon the statements in the certificate.TITLE III DOUBLE-CHECKING SYSTEM FOR THE CATEGORIES OF PRODUCTS SUBJECT TO COMMUNITY QUANTITATIVE LIMITS Section I Exportation Article 6The competent authorities of Poland shall issue an export licence in respect of all consignments from Poland of textile products referred to in Annex II, up to the relevant quantitative limits as may be modified under the provisions of this Protocol and of textile products subject to any quantitative limits or surveillance system established as a result of the application of Articles 7 and 8 of the Protocol.Article 71. The export licence shall conform to the model annexed to this Appendix and it shall be valid for exports throughout the customs territory to which the Treaty establishing the European Community is applied. However, where the Community has made recourse to the provisions of Articles 7 and 8 of the Protocol in accordance with the provisions of Agreed Minute No 1, or to Agreed Minute No 2, the textile products covered by the export licences can only be put into free circulation in the region(s) of the Community indicated in those licences.2. Each export licence must certify, inter alia, that the quantity of product in question has been set off against the quantitative limit established for the category of the product concerned and shall only cover one of the categories of products listed in Annex II of the Protocol. It is to be used for one or more consignments of the product in question.3. Where the conversion rate provided for in Annex II is applied, the following note must be inserted in box 9 of the export licence: 'Conversion rate for garments of a commercial size not exceeding 130 cm is to be applied`.Article 8The competent authorities of the Community must be informed immediately of the withdrawal or modification of any export licence already delivered.Article 91. Export shall be set off against the quantitative limits established for the year in which the shipment of the goods has been effected even if the export licence is issued in accordance with this Protocol after such shipment.2. For the purpose of applying paragraph 1, shipment of the goods is considered to have taken place on the date of their loading onto the exporting aircraft, vehicle or vessel.Article 10The presentation of an export licence, in application of Article 12 hereafter, shall be effected not later than 31 March of the year following that in which the goods covered by the licence were shipped.Section II Importation Article 11Importation into the Community of textile products subject to quantitative limits shall be subject to the presentation of an import authorization or document.Article 121. The competent authorities of the Community shall issue the import authorization or document, referred to in Article 11, automatically within a maximum of five working days of the presentation by the importer of the original of the corresponding export licence.2. The import authorizations shall be valid for six months from the date of their issue for imports throughout the customs territory to which the Treaty establishing the European Community is applied. However, where the Community has recourse to the provisions of Articles 7 and 8 of the Protocol in accordance with the provisions of Agreed Minute No 1, or to Agreed Minute No 2, the products covered by the import licences can only be put into free circulation in the region(s) of the Community indicated in those licences.3. The competent authorities of the Community shall cancel the authorization or import document already issued whenever the corresponding export licence has been withdrawn.However, if the competent authorities of the Community are notified of the withdrawal or the cancellation of the export licence only after the importation of the products into the Community, the relevant quantities shall be set off against the quantitative limits established for the category and the quota year concerned.Article 131. If the competent authorities of the Community find that the total quantities covered by export licences issued by Poland for a particular category in any year exceed the quantitative limit established for that category established in Annex II for that category as may be modified in accordance with the provisions of this Protocol, or any quantitative limit established in accordance with Article 8 of this Protocol, the said authorities may suspend the further issue of import authorizations or documents. In this event, the competent authorities of the Community shall immediately inform the authorities of Poland and the special consultation procedure set out in Article 14 of this Protocol shall be initiated forthwith.2. Exports of products of Polish origin subject to quantitative limits or a surveillance system not covered by Polish export licences issued in accordance with the provisions of this Appendix may be refused an import authorization or document by the competent Community authorities.However, if the import of such products is allowed into the Community by the competent authorities of the Community, the quantities involved shall not be set off against the appropriate quantitative limits established in Annex II, or established by virtue of Article 8 of the Protocol, without the express agreement of the competent authorities of Poland, save as provided for in Article 11 of the Protocol.TITLE IV FORM AND PRODUCTION OF EXPORT LICENCES AND CERTIFICATES OF ORIGIN, AND COMMON PROVISIONS CONCERNING EXPORTS OF THE COMMUNITY Article 141. The export licence and the certificate of origin may comprise additional copies duly indicated as such. They shall be made out in English or French. If they are completed by hand, entries must be in ink and in printed script.These documents shall measures 210 × 297 mm. The paper used shall be white writing paper, sized, not containing mechanical pulp, and weighing not less than 25 g/m2.If the documents have several copies only the top copy, which is the original, shall be printed with the guilloche pattern background. This copy shall be clearly marked as 'original` and the other copies as 'copies`. Only the original shall be accepted by the competent authorities of the Community as being valid for the control of export to the Community in accordance with the provisions of this Protocol.2. Each document shall bear a standardized serial number, whether or not printed, by which it can be identified.This number shall be composed of the following elements:- two letters identifying the exporting country as follows: PL,- two letters identifying the intended Member State of customs clearance as follows:AT - AustriaBL - BeneluxDE - GermanyDK - DenmarkEL - GreeceES - SpainFI - FinlandFR - FranceGB - United KingdomIE - IrelandIT - ItalyPT - PortugalSE - Sweden,- a one-digit number identifying quota year, corresponding to the last figure in the respective year, e.g. 7 for 1997,- a two-digit number from 01 to 99, identifying the particular issuing office concerned in the exporting country,- a five-digit number running consecutively from 00001 to 99999 allocated to the intended Member State of customs clearance.Article 15The export licence and the certificate of origin may be issued after the shipment of the products to which they relate. In such cases they must bear the endorsement 'delivré a posteriori` or the endorsement 'issued retrospectively`.Article 161. In the event of theft, loss or destruction of an export licence or a certificate of origin, the exporter may apply to the competent governmental authority which issued the document for a duplicate to be made out on the basis of the export documents in his possession. The duplicate of any such certificate or licence so issued shall bear the endorsement 'duplicata` or 'duplicate`.2. The duplicate shall bear the date of the original export licence or certificate of origin.TITLE V PROVISIONS CONCERNING COMMUNITY EXPORTS TO POLAND Article 17Should it be necessary, either Party may request consultations in accordance with Article 14 of the Protocol, in order to establish specific administrative provisions concerning Community exports to Poland.Such provisions shall afford the same or equivalent degree of protection to Community exporters as is provided for Polish exporters under this Protocol.TITLE VI ADMINISTRATIVE COOPERATION Article 18The Community and Poland shall co-operate fully in the implementation of the provisions of this Protocol. To this end, contacts and exchanges of views, including on technical matters, shall be facilitated by both Parties.Article 19In order to ensure the correct application of this Appendix, the Community and Poland offer mutual assistance for the checking of the authenticity and the veracity of export licences and certificates of origin issued or of any declarations made within the terms of this Appendix.Article 20Poland shall transmit to the European Commission the names and addresses of the authorities competent to issue and verify the export licences and the certificates of origin, together with specimens of the stamps used by these authorities and specimen signatures of officials responsible for signing the export licences.Article 211. Subsequent verification of certificates of origin or export licences shall be carried out at random, or whenever the competent Community authorities have reasonable doubt as to the authenticity of the certificate or licence or as to the accuracy of the information regarding the true origin of the products in question.2. In such cases, the competent authorities in the Community shall return the certificate for origin or the export licence or a copy thereof to the competent Polish authority, giving, where appropriate, the reasons of form or substance which justify an inquiry. If the invoice has been submitted, such invoice or a copy thereof shall be attached to the certificate or to the licence or their copies. The authorities shall also forward any information that has been obtained suggesting that the particulars given on the said certificate or licence are inaccurate.3. The provisions of paragraph 1 shall also apply to subsequent verifications of the declarations of origin provided for in Article 2 of this Appendix.4. The results of the subsequent verifications carried out in accordance with paragraphs 1 and 2 shall be communicated to the competent authorities of the Community within three months at the latest.The information communicated shall indicate whether the disputed certificate, licence or declaration, applies to the goods actually exported and whether these goods are eligible for export under the arrangements established by this Protocol. The information shall also include, at the request of the Community, copies of all the documentation necessary to fully determine the facts, and in particular the true origin of the goods.Should such verifications reveal systematic irregularities in the use of declarations of origin, the Community may subject imports of the products in question to the provisions of Article 2 (1) of this Appendix.5. For the purpose of subsequent verification of certificates of origin, copies of the certificates as well as any export documents referring to them shall be kept for at least three years by the competent Polish authorities.6. Recourse to the random verification procedure specified in this Article must not constitute an obstacle to the release for home use of the products in question.Article 221. Where the verification procedure referred to in Article 21, or where information available to the competent authorities of the Community or of Poland indicates or appears to indicate that the provisions of this Protocol are being circumvented or infringed, the two Parties shall cooperate closely and with the appropriate urgency in order to prevent any such circumvention or infringement.2. To this end, the competent authorities of Poland shall, on their own initiative or at the request of the Community, carry out appropriate inquiries, or arrange for such inquiries to be carried out, concerning operations which are, or appear to the Community to be, in circumvention or infringement of this Protocol. Poland shall communicate the results of these inquiries to the Community, including any other pertinent information enabling the cause of the circumvention or infringement, including the true origin of the goods to be determined.3. By agreement between the Community and Poland, officials designated by the Community may be present at the inquiries referred to in paragraph 2.4. In pursuance of the cooperation referred to in paragraph 1, the competent authorities of the Community and Poland shall exchange any information considered by either Party to be of use in preventing circumvention or infringement of the provisions of this Protocol. These exchanges may include information on the production of textile products in Poland and on the trade in the type of products covered by this Protocol between Poland and third countries, particularly where the Community has reasonable grounds to consider that the products in question may be in transit across the territory of Poland prior to their importation into the Community. This information may include, at the request of the Community, copies of all available relevant documentation.5. Where sufficient evidence shows that the provisions of this Protocol have been circumvented or infringed, the competent authorities of Poland and the Community may agree to take the measures set out in Article 11 (4) of the Protocol, and any other measures as are necessary to prevent a recurrence of such circumvention or infringement.Annex referred to in Appendix A Article 2 (1) >START OF GRAPHIC>>END OF GRAPHIC>Annex referred to in Appendix A, Article 7 (1) >START OF GRAPHIC>>END OF GRAPHIC>Appendix B Reimports into the Community, within the meaning of Article 4 (2) of the Protocol, of products listed in the Annex to this Appendix shall be subject to the provisions of this Protocol, unless the special provisions below provide otherwise:1. Subject to paragraph 2, only reimports into the Community of products affected by the specific quantitative limits laid down in the Annex to this Appendix shall be considered reimports within the meaning of Article 4 (2) of the Protocol.2. Reimports not covered by the Annex to this Appendix may be made subject to specific quantitative limits following consultations in accordance with the procedures set out in Article 14 of the Protocol, provided the products concerned are subject to quantitative limits under Annex II to the Protocol or to surveillance measures.3. Having regard to the interests of both Parties, the Community may at its discretion, or in response to a request from Poland under Article 14 of the Protocol, examine and give effect to:(a) the possibility of transferring from one category to another, using in advance or carrying over from one year to the next, portions of specific quantitative limits;(b) the possibility of increasing specific quantitative limits.4. However, the Community may apply automatically the flexibility rules set out in paragraph 3 within the following limits:(a) transfers between categories may not exceed 25 % of the quantity for the category to which the transfer is made;(b) carryover of a specific quantitative limit from one year to the next may not exceed 13,5 % of the quantity set for the year of actual utilization;(c) advance use of specific quantitative limits from one year to another may not exceed 7,5 % of the quantity set for the year of actual utilization.5. The Community shall inform Poland of any measures taken pursuant to the preceding paragraphs.6. The competent authorities in the Community shall debit the specific quantitative limits referred to in paragraph 1 at the time of issue of the prior authorization required by Council Regulation (EEC) No 636/82 which governs economic outward processing arrangements. A specific quantitative limit shall be debited for the year in which a prior authorization is issued.7. Transfers from one category to another and combined debits from the quantitative limit for products of Group II and III will be calculated in accordance with the table of equivalence in Annex I to the Agreement.8. A certificate of origin made out by the organizations authorized to do so under Polish law shall be issued, in accordance with Appendix A to the Protocol, for all products covered by this Appendix. This certificate shall bear a reference to the prior authorization mentioned in paragraph 6 above as evidence that the processing operation it describes has been carried out in Poland.9. The Community shall provide Poland with the names and addresses of, and specimens of the stamps used by, the competent authorities of the Community which issue the prior authorizations referred to in paragraph 6 above.10. Without prejudice to the provisions of paragraphs 1 to 9 above, Poland and the Community shall continue consultations with a view to reaching a mutually acceptable solution enabling both Parties to benefit from the Protocol's provisions on outward processing traffic and so ensure the effective development of trade in textile products between Poland and the Community.Annex to Appendix B >TABLE>Appendix C (Referred to in Article 5 (3)) Cottage industry and folklore products originating in Poland 1. The exemption provided for in Article 5 (3) in respect of cottage industry products shall apply to the following types of product only:(a) fabrics woven on looms operated solely by hand or foot, being fabrics of a kind traditionally made in the cottage industry of Poland;(b) garments or other textile articles of a kind traditionally made in the cottage industry of Poland obtained manually from the fabrics referred to above and sewn exclusively by hand without the aid of any machine;(c) traditional folklore products of Poland made by hand, in a list to be agreed between the Community and Poland.Exemption shall be granted in respect only of products covered by a certificate conforming to the specimen attached to this Appendix and issued by the competent authorities in the supplying Party. These certificates must indicate the reasons justifying their issuance; the competent authorities of the importing Party will accept them after having checked that the products concerned have fulfilled the conditions established in this Appendix. The certificates concerning the products envisaged in indent (c) must bear the stamp 'FOLKLORE` clearly marked. In the case of a difference of opinion between the Parties concerning the nature of these products, consultations shall be held within one month in order to resolve these differences.Should imports of any product covered by this Appendix reach proportions liable to cause problems within the Community, consultations with Poland shall be initiated as soon as possible, with a view to resolving the situation by the adoption, if necessary, of a quantitative limit, in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 14 of this Protocol.2. The provisions of Titles IV and V of Appendix A shall apply mutatis mutandis to the products covered by paragraph 1 of this Appendix.Annex to Appendix C >START OF GRAPHIC>>END OF GRAPHIC>Agreed Minute No 1 In the context of the Protocol between the European Economic Community and the Republic of Poland on trade in textile and clothing products, initialled on 11 December 1992, the Parties agreed that Articles 7 and 8 of the Protocol do not preclude the Community, if the conditions are fulfilled, from applying the surveillance system or the safeguard measures for one or more of its regions in conformity with the principles of the internal market.In such an event, the Republic of Poland shall be informed in advance of the relevant provisions of Appendix A to this Protocol to be applied, as appropriate.For the Government of the Republic or PolandFor the Council of the European UnionAgreed Minute No 2 Notwithstanding Article 12 (1) of this Protocol, for imperative technical or administrative reasons or to find a solution to economic problems resulting from regional concentration of imports, or in order to combat circumvention and fraud of the provisions of this Protocol, the Community will establish for a limited period of time a specific management system in conformity with the principles of the internal market.However, if the parties are unable to reach a satisfactory solution during the consultations provided for in Article 12 (3), Poland undertakes, if so requested by the Community, to respect temporary export limits for one or more regions of the Community. In such a case, these limits shall not preclude the importation into the region(s) concerned of products which were shipped from Poland on the basis of export licences obtained before the date of formal notification to Poland by the Community about the introduction of the above limits.The Community shall inform Poland of the technical and administrative measures, such as defined in the attached Note Verbale, that need to be introduced by both Parties in order to implement the above paragraphs in conformity with the principles of the internal market.For the Government of the Republic of PolandFor the Council of the European UnionNote verbale The Directorate-General for External Relations of the Commission of the European Communities presents its compliments to the Mission of the Republic of Poland to the European Communities and has the honour to refer to the Protocol on textile products negotiated between the Republic of Poland and the Community initialled on 11 December 1992.The Directorate-General wishes to inform the Mission of the Republic of Poland that the Community has decided to apply, starting from 1 January 1993, the provisions of paragraph 1 of Agreed Minute No 2 to the Protocol initialled on 11 December 1992. Consequently, the corresponding provisions of Articles 7 and 12 of Appendix A to the Protocol shall also be applied as of the above date.The Directorate-General for External Relations avails itself of this opportunity to renew to the Mission of the Republic of Poland to the European Communities the assurance of its highest consideration.Agreed Minute No 3 In the context of the Protocol between the European Economic Community and the Republic of Poland on trade in textile and clothing products, initialled in Brussels on 11 December 1992, the Parties agreed that Poland shall endeavour not to deprive certain regions of the Community which have traditionally had relatively small shares of Community quotas of imports or products serving as inputs for their processing industry.The Community and the Republic of Poland further agree to hold consultations, should the need arise, in order to avert any problems which might occur in this respect.For the Government of the Republic of PolandFor the Council of the European UnionAgreed Minute No 4 In the context of the Protocol between the European Economic Community and the Republic of Poland on trade in textile and clothing products, initialled in Brussels on 11 December 1992, the Republic of Poland agreed that, from the date of the request for and pending the consultations referred to in Article 12 (3), it shall cooperate by not issuing export licences that would further aggravate the problems resulting from the regional concentration of direct imports into the Community.For the Government of the Republic of PolandFor the Council of the European UnionAgreed Minute No 5 In the context of the Protocol between the European Economic Community and the Republic of Poland on trade in textile and clothing products, initialled in Brussels on 11 December 1992, the Parties agreed that all references in the Protocol to the period of application of the Protocol or to the period at the end of which all quantitative restrictions shall be abolished, are understood to mean a five-year period starting from 1 January 1993 unless the Uruguay Round multilateral negotiations are concluded and their results enter into force in 1992. In this case the periods referred to above shall be equal to half the period for the integration of textile and clothing products into the GATT as decided in those negotiations, but it shall in any case not be shorter than five years starting from 1 January 1993.For the Government of the Republic of PolandFor the Council of the European UnionAgreed Minute No 6 In the context of the Protocol between the European Economic Community and the Republic of Poland on trade in textile and clothing products, initialled in Brussels on 11 December 1992, the Parties agreed that carry-over to the corresponding quantitative limit for the year 1993 of amounts not used during the year 1992 under the Agreement on trade in textile products initialled in Brussels on 27 June 1986, as amended by the Protocol initialled on 15 October 1991, is authorized up to 9 % of the corresponding quantitative limits for 1992.For the Government of the Republic of PolandFor the Council of the European UnionExchange of notes The Directorate-General for External Relations of the Commission of the European Communities presents its compliments to the Mission of the Republic of Poland to the European Communities and has the honour to refer to the Protocol on textile products between the Republic of Poland and the Community initialled on 11 December 1992.The Directorate-General wishes to inform the Mission of the Republic of Poland that while awaiting the completion of the necessary procedures for the conclusion and the coming into force to the Protocol, the Community is prepared to allow the provisions of the Protocol to apply de facto from 1 January 1993. This is on the understanding that either Party may at any time terminate this de facto application of the Protocol provided that 120 days' notice is given.The Directorate-General for External Relations would be grateful if the Mission would confirm its agreement to the foregoing.The Directorate-General for External Relations avails itself of this opportunity to renew to the Mission of the Republic of Poland to the European Communities the assurance of its highest consideration.Exchange of Notes The Mission of the Republic of Poland to the European Communities presents its compliments to the Directorate-General for External Relations of the Commission of the European Communities and has the honour to refer to the Director-General's note regarding the Protocol on textile products between the Republic of Poland and the Community initialled on 11 December 1992.The Mission of the Republic of Poland wishes to confirm to the Directorate-General that while awaiting the completion of the necessary procedures for the conclusion and the coming into force of the Protocol, the Government of the Republic of Poland is prepared to allow the provisions of the Protocol to apply de facto from 1 January 1993. This is on the understanding that either Party may at any time terminate this de facto application of the Protocol provided that 120 days' notice is given.The Mission of the Republic of Poland to the European Communities avails itself of this opportunity to renew to the Directorate-General for External Relations the assurance of its highest consideration.