text: b'TREASURY INSPECTOR GENERAL FOR TAX ADMINISTRATION\n\n\n\n\n The Revised Private Debt Collection Request\n for Quotation Adequately Addressed Prior\n Deficiencies in the Solicitation Methodology\n\n\n\n April 2006\n\n Reference No: 2006-10-078\n\n\n\n\n This report has cleared the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration disclosure review process\n and information determined to be restricted from public release has been redacted from this document.\n\n\n\n Phone Number | 202-927-7037\n Email Address | Bonnie.Heald@tigta.treas.gov\n Web Site | http://www.tigta.gov\n\x0c DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY\n WASHINGTON, D.C. 20220\n\n\n\n\nTREASURY INSPECTOR GENERAL\n FOR TAX ADMINISTRATION\n\n\n\n\n April 28, 2006\n\n\n MEMORANDUM FOR COMMISSIONER, SMALL BUSINESS/SELF-EMPLOYED\n DIVISION\n CHIEF, AGENCY-WIDE SHARED SERVICES\n\n FROM: Michael R. Phillips\n Deputy Inspector General for Audit\n\n SUBJECT: Final Audit Report \xe2\x80\x93 The Revised Private Debt Collection Request for\n Quotation Adequately Addressed Prior Deficiencies in the Solicitation\n Methodology (Audit # 200610016)\n\n This report presents the results of our review of the revised Private Debt Collection (PDC)\n Request for Quotation (RFQ). The overall objective of this limited-scope review was to\n determine whether the revised RFQ and associated procurement selection criteria adequately\n addressed the deficiencies cited by the United States Court of Federal Claims. We did not\n review the bid evaluations or the selection of the contractors for this program; accordingly, we\n do not express an opinion on such.\n This was a special, limited-scope audit that, together with an ongoing series of companion audits\n conducted by the Office of Audit\xe2\x80\x99s Small Business and Corporate Programs and Information\n Systems Programs Business Units, provides coverage of a key initiative for which the Treasury\n Inspector General for Tax Administration committed resources as a high priority.\n\n Synopsis\n On October 22, 2004, the President signed the American Jobs Creation Act of 20041 to permit\n private collection agencies (PCA) to help collect Federal tax debts. The purpose of the PDC\n program is to help reduce the significant and growing number of uncollectible cases and enable\n the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) to better focus existing resources on more difficult cases.\n The IRS issued a detailed RFQ for solicitation of debt collection services in support of the PDC\n\n\n 1\n Pub. L. No. 108-357, 118 Stat. 1418 (2004).\n\x0c The Revised Private Debt Collection Request for\n Quotation Adequately Addressed Prior Deficiencies\n in the Solicitation Methodology\n\n\nprogram on April 25, 2005. However, this RFQ was canceled after the United States Court of\nFederal Claims filed an order on July 25, 2005, informing the IRS it intended to enjoin the\nsolicitation. The order ruled that the IRS\xe2\x80\x99 restriction of the solicitation only to vendors with\ncurrent Federal Government debt collection task orders was arbitrary and capricious. The IRS\nsubsequently revised the RFQ and reissued it on October 14, 2005.\nOverall, the revised RFQ adequately addressed the deficiencies cited by the United States Court\nof Federal Claims. The IRS deleted the requirement that PCAs must have a current Federal\nGovernment debt collection task order to be eligible for the solicitation. We did not identify any\nother restrictions in the RFQ which would have unnecessarily limited the procurement process.\nFurther, the revised RFQ was reviewed by the IRS\xe2\x80\x99 Office of Procurement Policy Quality\nAssurance Branch and General Legal Services staff as required by IRS procurement procedures.\nAlso, the scoring criteria and review methodology documented in the evaluation plan were\nconsistent with the revised RFQ and similarly did not\ncontain any restrictions which would have unnecessarily\n \xe2\x80\xa6the evaluation criteria and\nlimited the procurement process. The selection evaluation process, if rigorously followed,\nfactors and their relative importance were clearly outlined fairly applied, and adequately\nin the revised RFQ and were consistent with the Federal documented, should provide a\nAcquisition Regulation.2 In our opinion, the evaluation reasonable basis for selecting\ncriteria and process, if rigorously followed, fairly applied, highly qualified vendors that will\n meet the needs of the PDC\nand adequately documented, should provide a reasonable program.\nbasis for selecting highly qualified vendors that will meet\nthe needs of the PDC program. We briefed the IRS on the\ninterim results of our review on February 2, 2006.\nThe IRS awarded contracts to three PCAs on March 9, 2006, under the terms of the revised RFQ.\nThe IRS planned to begin delivering delinquent tax account cases to the selected PCAs by\nJuly 2006. However, on March 23, 2006, the IRS announced it had issued stop-work orders to\nthe three PCAs after two unsuccessful bidders filed bid protests with the Government\nAccountability Office.\nThe Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration plans to continue evaluating the\nimplementation of this initiative as part of a continuing series of companion audits being\nconducted by the Office of Audit\xe2\x80\x99s Small Business and Corporate Programs and Information\nSystems Programs Business Units.\n\n\n\n\n2\n 48 C.F.R. ch. 1 (2005).\n\n\n 2\n\x0c The Revised Private Debt Collection Request for\n Quotation Adequately Addressed Prior Deficiencies\n in the Solicitation Methodology\n\n\n\nRecommendations\nWe are making no recommendations in this report; however, key IRS management officials\nreviewed it prior to issuance and agreed with the facts and finding presented.\nCopies of this report are being sent to the IRS managers affected by the report. Please contact\nme at (202) 622-8500 if you have questions or Daniel R. Devlin, Assistant Inspector General for\nAudit (Headquarters Operations and Exempt Organizations Programs), at (202) 622-8500.\n\n\n\n\n 3\n\x0c The Revised Private Debt Collection Request for\n Quotation Adequately Addressed Prior Deficiencies\n in the Solicitation Methodology\n\n\n\n\n Table of Contents\n\nBackground ..........................................................................................................Page 1\n\nResults of Review ...............................................................................................Page 3\n The Revised Request for Quotation and Associated Selection\n Documents Adequately Addressed the Deficiencies Cited by the\n United States Court of Federal Claims .........................................................Page 3\n\nAppendices\n Appendix I \xe2\x80\x93 Detailed Objective, Scope, and Methodology ........................Page 5\n Appendix II \xe2\x80\x93 Major Contributors to This Report ........................................Page 6\n Appendix III \xe2\x80\x93 Report Distribution List .......................................................Page 7\n\x0c The Revised Private Debt Collection Request for\n Quotation Adequately Addressed Prior Deficiencies\n in the Solicitation Methodology\n\n\n\n\n Background\n\nOn October 22, 2004, President Bush signed the American Jobs Creation Act of 20041 that\ncreated a new Section 6306 of the Internal Revenue Code to permit private collection agencies\n(PCA) to help collect Federal tax debts. The purpose of the program is to help reduce the\nsignificant and growing number of uncollectible cases and enable the Internal Revenue Service\n(IRS) to better focus existing resources to address more difficult cases. Department of the\nTreasury officials estimate that over the next several years the Private Debt Collection (PDC)\nprogram, formerly the Collection Contract Support program, will result in approximately\n$1 billion more in revenue.\nAccording to the IRS, the initiative to use PCAs will:\n \xe2\x80\xa2 Help reduce gross tax accounts receivables to the IRS which as of September 2005 were\n $258 billion.\n \xe2\x80\xa2 Enable the IRS to focus its limited collection and enforcement resources on the most\n difficult cases and issues.\n \xe2\x80\xa2 Help maintain public confidence in the tax system.\nThe IRS issued a detailed Request for Quotation (RFQ) for solicitation of debt collection\nservices from PCAs listed on the General Services Administration Federal Supply Schedule in\nsupport of the PDC program on April 25, 2005. The IRS planned to select three PCAs and begin\nissuing cases in January 2006. However, this RFQ was canceled after the United States Court of\nFederal Claims filed an order on July 25, 2005, informing the IRS it intended to enjoin the\nsolicitation. The order ruled that the IRS\xe2\x80\x99 restriction of\nthe solicitation only to vendors with current Federal\nGovernment debt collection task orders was arbitrary . . . the United States Court of\nand capricious. The IRS subsequently revised the RFQ Federal Claims . . . ruled that the\n IRS\xe2\x80\x99 restriction of the\nand reissued it on October 14, 2005. The IRS now solicitation to vendors with\nintends to begin delivering delinquent tax account cases current Federal Government\nto the selected PCAs by July 2006. debt collection task orders was\n arbitrary and capricious.\nThis limited-scope, follow-up audit focused on the IRS\xe2\x80\x99\nefforts to address the issues raised by the United States\nCourt of Federal Claims. We did not review the bid evaluations or the selection of the\ncontractors for this program; accordingly, we do not express an opinion on such.\n\n\n1\n Pub. L. No. 108-357, 118 Stat. 1418 (2004).\n Page 1\n\x0c The Revised Private Debt Collection Request for\n Quotation Adequately Addressed Prior Deficiencies\n in the Solicitation Methodology\n\n\n\nThis review was performed at the Small Business/Self-Employed Division in New Carrollton,\nMaryland, in the Office of Filing and Payment Compliance, and at the Agency-Wide Shared\nServices Division in Oxon Hill, Maryland, in the Office of Procurement Business Operations,\nduring the period November 2005 through February 2006. The audit was conducted in\naccordance with Government Auditing Standards. This was a special, limited-scope audit that,\ntogether with companion audits being conducted by the Office of Audit\xe2\x80\x99s Small Business and\nCorporate Programs and Information Systems Programs Business Units, provides coverage of a\nkey initiative for which the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration committed\nresources as a high priority. Detailed information on our audit objective, scope, and\nmethodology is presented in Appendix I. Major contributors to the report are listed in\nAppendix II.\n\n\n\n\n Page 2\n\x0c The Revised Private Debt Collection Request for\n Quotation Adequately Addressed Prior Deficiencies\n in the Solicitation Methodology\n\n\n\n\n Results of Review\n\nThe Revised Request for Quotation and Associated Selection\nDocuments Adequately Addressed the Deficiencies Cited by the\nUnited States Court of Federal Claims\nOverall, the revised RFQ adequately addressed the deficiencies cited by the United States Court\nof Federal Claims. The IRS deleted the requirement that PCAs must have a current Federal\nGovernment debt collection task order to be eligible for the solicitation. Our review did not\nidentify any other restrictions which would have unnecessarily limited the procurement process.\nFurther, the revised RFQ was reviewed by the IRS\xe2\x80\x99 Office of Procurement Policy Quality\nAssurance Branch and General Legal Services staff as required by IRS procedures for\nacquisitions of this size. The purpose of these reviews is to ensure the legal sufficiency and\nregulatory compliance of the RFQ.\nAlso, the scoring criteria and review methodology documented in the evaluation plan were\nconsistent with the revised RFQ and similarly did not contain any restrictions which would have\nunnecessarily limited the procurement process. The selection evaluation factors and their\nrelative importance were clearly outlined in the revised RFQ and were consistent with the\nFederal Acquisition Regulation.2\nSpecifically, the RFQ notes that in evaluating vendor proposals, the IRS will consider three key\nfactors: 1) relevant experience and past performance, 2) technical approach to satisfying the\nrequirements outlined in the RFQ, and 3) management plan\nregarding the organization of staff and work to meet the RFQ . . . the evaluation criteria and\nrequirements. The IRS ranked relevant experience and past process, if rigorously followed,\nperformance as having the highest importance, which is fairly applied, and adequately\n documented, should provide a\nconsistent with the extreme sensitivity of the PDC program.\n reasonable basis for selecting\nThe IRS ranked technical approach as having the next highest highly qualified vendors that will\nimportance, followed by the management plan. In our meet the needs of the PDC\nopinion, the evaluation criteria and process, if rigorously program.\nfollowed, fairly applied, and adequately documented, should\nprovide a reasonable basis for selecting highly qualified\nvendors that will meet the needs of the PDC program. We briefed the IRS on the results of our\nreview on February 2, 2006.\n\n\n\n2\n 48 C.F.R. ch. 1 (2005).\n Page 3\n\x0c The Revised Private Debt Collection Request for\n Quotation Adequately Addressed Prior Deficiencies\n in the Solicitation Methodology\n\n\n\nThe IRS awarded contracts to three PCAs on March 9, 2006, under the terms of the revised RFQ.\nThe IRS informed us it planned to begin delivering delinquent tax account cases to the selected\nPCAs by July 2006 as part of the first phase of the PDC program. The second phase will be the\nfull-scale implementation involving up to 12 PCAs. The IRS plans to issue another RFQ after\nevaluating the results of the initial phase and begin the full-scale implementation in\nJanuary 2008. However, on March 23, 2006, the IRS announced it had issued stop-work orders\nto the three PCAs after two unsuccessful bidders filed bid protests with the Government\nAccountability Office. The IRS also announced that during the resolution of the protests it will\ncontinue to prepare for debt collection work to begin.\nThe Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration plans to continue evaluating the\nimplementation of this initiative as part of a continuing series of companion audits being\nconducted by the Office of Audit\xe2\x80\x99s Small Business and Corporate Programs and Information\nSystems Programs Business Units.\n\n\n\n\n Page 4\n\x0c The Revised Private Debt Collection Request for\n Quotation Adequately Addressed Prior Deficiencies\n in the Solicitation Methodology\n\n\n\n Appendix I\n\n Detailed Objective, Scope, and Methodology\n\nThe overall objective of this limited-scope review was to determine whether the revised Request\nfor Quotation (RFQ) and associated procurement selection criteria adequately addressed the\ndeficiencies cited by the United States Court of Federal Claims. We did not review the bid\nevaluations or contractor selections that were made. To accomplish our objective, we:\nI. Reviewed the Federal Acquisition Regulation1 regarding vendor selection procedures.\nII. Determined whether the IRS has taken effective actions to address concerns regarding the\n unnecessary restrictiveness of the original solicitation.\n A. Obtained the latest version of the RFQ and identified the changes from the initial\n version of the RFQ.\n B. Evaluated the changes made to the RFQ to address the concerns and deficiencies\n cited by the United States Court of Federal Claims on the prior RFQ.\n C. Analyzed the reason and justification for any other significant changes to the RFQ.\n D. Determined whether the revised RFQ and evaluation plan were reviewed by IRS legal\n counsel.\nIII. Determined whether the scoring criteria and methodology to be used by the evaluation\n team was consistent with the revised RFQ and did not unnecessarily restrict the selection\n process.\n\n\n\n\n1\n 48 C.F.R. ch. 1 (2005).\n Page 5\n\x0c The Revised Private Debt Collection Request for\n Quotation Adequately Addressed Prior Deficiencies\n in the Solicitation Methodology\n\n\n\n Appendix II\n\n Major Contributors to This Report\n\nDaniel R. Devlin, Assistant Inspector General for Audit (Headquarters Operations and Exempt\nOrganizations Programs)\nJohn R. Wright, Director\nAnthony J. Choma, Audit Manager\nPhilip A. Smith, Lead Auditor\nThomas Dori, Senior Auditor\nChinita Coates, Auditor\nRashme Sawhney, Auditor\n\n\n\n\n Page 6\n\x0c The Revised Private Debt Collection Request for\n Quotation Adequately Addressed Prior Deficiencies\n in the Solicitation Methodology\n\n\n\n Appendix III\n\n Report Distribution List\n\nCommissioner C\nOffice of the Commissioner \xe2\x80\x93 Attention: Chief of Staff C\nDeputy Commissioner for Services and Enforcement SE\nDeputy Commissioner for Operations Support OS\nDeputy Commissioner, Small Business/Self-Employed Division SE:S\nDirector, Collection, Small Business/Self-Employed Division SE:S:C\nDirector, Office of Procurement OS:A:P\nChief Counsel CC\nNational Taxpayer Advocate TA\nDirector, Office of Legislative Affairs CL:LA\nDirector, Office of Program Evaluation and Risk Analysis RAS:O\nOffice of Management Controls OS:CFO:AR:M\nAudit Liaison: Office of Procurement OS:A:P\n\n\n\n\n Page 7\n\x0c'


type: legislation

jurisdiction: EU

text:
 14.5.2019
 SK
 Úradný vestník Európskej únie
 L 125/13
 VYKONÁVACIE NARIADENIE KOMISIE (EÚ) 2019/760
 z 13. mája 2019,
 ktorým sa podľa nariadenia Európskeho parlamentu a Rady (EÚ) 2015/2283 povoľuje umiestnenie biomasy kvasiniek Yarrowia lipolytica na trh ako novej potraviny a mení vykonávacie nariadenie Komisie (EÚ) 2017/2470
 (Text s významom pre EHP)
 EURÓPSKA KOMISIA,
 so zreteľom na Zmluvu o fungovaní Európskej únie,
 so zreteľom na nariadenie Európskeho parlamentu a Rady (EÚ) 2015/2283 z 25. novembra 2015 o nových potravinách, ktorým sa mení nariadenie Európskeho parlamentu a Rady (EÚ) č. 1169/2011, ktorým sa zrušuje nariadenie Európskeho parlamentu a Rady (ES) č. 258/97 a nariadenie Komisie (ES) č. 1852/2001 (1), a najmä na jeho článok 12,
 keďže:
 (1)
 V nariadení (EÚ) 2015/2283 sa stanovuje, že na trh v Únii možno umiestňovať iba nové potraviny, ktoré sú povolené a zaradené do únijného zoznamu.
 (2)
 V súlade s článkom 8 nariadenia (EÚ) 2015/2283 bolo prijaté vykonávacie nariadenie Komisie (EÚ) 2017/2470 (2), ktorým sa zriaďuje únijný zoznam povolených nových potravín.
 (3)
 Podľa článku 12 nariadenia (EÚ) 2015/2283 má Komisia predložiť návrh vykonávacieho aktu, ktorým sa povoľuje umiestnenie novej potraviny na trh Únie a aktualizuje únijný zoznam.
 (4)
 V súlade s článkom 4 nariadenia Európskeho parlamentu a Rady (ES) č. 258/97 (3) spoločnosť Skotan S.A. (ďalej len „žiadateľ“) požiadala 10. apríla 2017 príslušný orgán Poľska o povolenie umiestniť biomasu kvasiniek Yarrowia lipolytica na trh Únie ako novú potravinu v zmysle článku 1 ods. 2 písm. d) uvedeného nariadenia. Žiadosť bola podaná v súvislosti s použitím biomasy kvasiniek Yarrowia lipolytica vo výživových doplnkoch. Najvyššie prípustné množstvá navrhované žiadateľom sú 3 g denne pre deti vo veku od 3 do 9 rokov a 6 g denne vo veku od 10 rokov.
 (5)
 Príslušný orgán Poľska vydal 15. novembra 2017 svoju správu o prvotnom posudku. V uvedenej správe dospel k záveru, že biomasa kvasiniek Yarrowia lipolytica spĺňa kritériá novej potraviny stanovené v článku 3 ods. 1 nariadenia (ES) č. 258/97.
 (6)
 Podľa článku 35 ods. 1 nariadenia (EÚ) 2015/2283 sa akákoľvek žiadosť o umiestnenie novej potraviny na trh v rámci Únie predložená členskému štátu podľa článku 4 nariadenia (ES) č. 258/97, v súvislosti s ktorou nebolo prijaté konečné rozhodnutie pred 1. januárom 2018, považuje za žiadosť predloženú podľa nariadenia (EÚ) 2015/2283.
 (7)
 Žiadosť o umiestnenie biomasy kvasiniek Yarrowia lipolytica ako novej potraviny na trh Únie bola predložená členskému štátu v súlade s článkom 4 nariadenia (ES) č. 258/97, pričom spĺňa aj požiadavky stanovené v nariadení (EÚ) 2015/2283.
 (8)
 V súlade s článkom 10 ods. 3 nariadenia (EÚ) 2015/2283 sa Komisia 22. júna 2018 obrátila na Európsky úrad pre bezpečnosť potravín (ďalej len „úrad“) a požiadala ho o vedecké stanovisko na základe posúdenia biomasy kvasiniek Yarrowia lipolytica ako novej potraviny.
 (9)
 Úrad prijal 17. januára 2019„Vedecké stanovisko k bezpečnosti biomasy kvasiniek Yarrowia lipolytica ako novej potraviny podľa nariadenia (EÚ) 2015/2283“ (4). Uvedené stanovisko spĺňa požiadavky článku 11 nariadenia (EÚ) 2015/2283.
 (10)
 Úrad vo svojom stanovisku poskytuje dostatočné odôvodnenie záveru, že biomasa kvasiniek Yarrowia lipolytica, ak sa používa vo výživových doplnkoch, je pri navrhovaných spôsoboch a v navrhovaných množstvách použitia v súlade s článkom 12 ods. 1 nariadenia (EÚ) 2015/2283.
 (11)
 Smernicou Európskeho parlamentu a Rady 2002/46/ES (5) sa stanovujú požiadavky na výživové doplnky. Používanie biomasy kvasiniek Yarrowia lipolytica by sa malo povoliť bez toho, aby boli dotknuté požiadavky uvedenej smernice.
 (12)
 Opatrenia stanovené v tomto nariadení sú v súlade so stanoviskom Stáleho výboru pre rastliny, zvieratá, potraviny a krmivá,
 PRIJALA TOTO NARIADENIE:
 Článok 1
 1. Biomasa kvasiniek Yarrowia lipolytica špecifikovaná v prílohe k tomuto nariadeniu sa zaraďuje do únijného zoznamu povolených nových potravín zriadeného vykonávacím nariadením (EÚ) 2017/2470.
 2. Zápis v únijnom zozname podľa odseku 1 musí obsahovať podmienky používania a požiadavky na označovanie stanovené v prílohe k tomuto nariadeniu.
 3. Povolenie stanovené v tomto článku nemá vplyv na ustanovenia smernice 2002/46/ES.
 Článok 2
 Príloha k vykonávaciemu nariadeniu (EÚ) 2017/2470 sa mení v súlade s prílohou k tomuto nariadeniu.
 Článok 3
 Toto nariadenie nadobúda účinnosť dvadsiatym dňom po jeho uverejnení v Úradnom vestníku Európskej únie.
 Toto nariadenie je záväzné v celom rozsahu a priamo uplatniteľné vo všetkých členských štátoch.
 V Bruseli 13. mája 2019
 Za Komisiu
 predseda
 Jean-Claude JUNCKER
 (1) Ú. v. EÚ L 327, 11.12.2015, s. 1.
 (2) Vykonávacie nariadenie Komisie (EÚ) 2017/2470 z 20. decembra 2017, ktorým sa zriaďuje únijný zoznam nových potravín v súlade s nariadením Európskeho parlamentu a Rady (EÚ) 2015/2283 o nových potravinách (Ú. v. EÚ L 351, 30.12.2017, s. 72).
 (3) Nariadenie Európskeho Parlamentu a Rady (ES) č. 258/97 z 27. januára 1997 o nových potravinách a nových prídavných látkach (Ú. v. ES L 43, 14.2.1997, s. 1).
 (4) Vestník EFSA (EFSA Journal) (2019) 17(2):5594.
 (5) Smernica Európskeho parlamentu a Rady 2002/46/ES z 10. júna 2002 o aproximácii právnych predpisov členských štátov týkajúcich sa potravinových doplnkov (Ú. v. ES L 183, 12.7.2002, s. 51).
 PRÍLOHA
 Príloha k vykonávaciemu nariadeniu (EÚ) 2017/2470 sa mení takto:
 1.
 Do tabuľky 1 (Povolené nové potraviny) sa v abecednom poradí vkladá tento zápis:
 „Povolená nová potravina
 Podmienky, za ktorých možno novú potravinu používať
 Doplňujúce špecifické požiadavky na označovanie
 Iné požiadavky
 Biomasa kvasiniek Yarrowia lipolytica
 Konkrétna kategória potravín
 Najvyššie prípustné množstvá
 Názov novej potraviny na označení potravín, ktoré ju obsahujú, je ‚tepelne usmrtená biomasa kvasiniek Yarrowia lipolytica‘“.
 Výživové doplnky v smernici 2002/46/ES nesprávne vymedzené ako „potravinové doplnky“ okrem výživových doplnkov pre dojčatá a malé deti
 6 g/deň pre deti vo veku od 10 rokov, dospievajúce a dospelé obyvateľstvo vo všeobecnosti
 3 g/deň pre deti vo veku od 3 do 9 rokov
 2.
 Do tabuľky 2 (Špecifikácie) sa v abecednom poradí vkladá tento zápis:
 „Povolená nová potravina
 Špecifikácia
 Biomasa kvasiniek Yarrowia lipolytica
 Opis/Definícia
 Nová potravina je vysušená a tepelne usmrtená biomasa kvasiniek Yarrowia lipolytica.
 Charakteristiky/Zloženie
 Bielkoviny: 45 – 55 g/100 g
 Vláknina: 24 – 30 g/100 g
 Cukry: < 1,0 g/100 g
 Tuky: 7 – 10 g/100 g
 Celkový popol: ≤ 12 %
 Obsah vody: ≤ 5 %
 Obsah sušiny: ≥ 95 %
 Mikrobiologické kritériá:
 Celkový počet aeróbnych mikroorganizmov: ≤ 5 × 103 JTK/g
 Celkový počet kvasiniek a plesní: ≤ 102 JTK/g
 Životaschopné bunky kvasiniek Yarrowia lipolytica
 (1): < 10 JTK/g (t. j. detekčný limit)
 Koliformné baktérie: ≤ 10 JTK/g
 Salmonella spp.: Neprítomná v 25 g
 (1) Test sa vykoná bezprostredne po kroku tepelného ošetrenia. Musia byť zavedené opatrenia na zabránenie krížovej kontaminácii životaschopnými bunkami kvasiniek Yarrowia lipolytica počas balenia a/alebo skladovania novej potraviny.“


text:
 UITVOERINGSVERORDENING (EU) .../... VAN DE COMMISSIE
 van 1.4.2022
 tot afwijking van Uitvoeringsverordening (EU) 2017/39 ten aanzien van het schooljaar 2021/2022 wat betreft de controles ter plaatse in de lokalen van steunaanvragers of onderwijsinstellingen in het kader van de schoolregeling
 DE EUROPESE COMMISSIE,
 Gezien het Verdrag betreffende de werking van de Europese Unie,
 Gezien Verordening (EU) nr. 1306/2013 van het Europees Parlement en de Raad van 17 december 2013 inzake de financiering, het beheer en de monitoring van het gemeenschappelijk landbouwbeleid en tot intrekking van Verordeningen (EEG) nr. 352/78, (EG) nr. 165/94, (EG) nr. 2799/98, (EG) nr. 814/2000, (EG) nr. 1290/2005 en (EG) nr. 485/2008 van de Raad
 1
 , en met name artikel 62, lid 2, eerste alinea, punten a), b) en c),
 Overwegende hetgeen volgt:
 (1)Artikel 10, lid 3, van Uitvoeringsverordening (EU) 2017/39 van de Commissie
 2
 bevat het minimumpercentage voor de controles ter plaatse die moeten worden verricht in de lokalen van de steunaanvragers die producten verstrekken en distribueren en begeleidende educatieve maatregelen uitvoeren in het kader van de in artikel 23 van Verordening (EU) nr. 1308/2013 van het Europees Parlement en de Raad
 3
 bedoelde regeling (“de schoolregeling”). In artikel 10, lid 3, vierde alinea, van Uitvoeringsverordening (EU) 2017/39 is bepaald dat wanneer de steunaanvrager geen onderwijsinstelling is, de in de lokalen van de aanvrager verrichte controle ter plaatse wordt aangevuld met controles ter plaatse in de lokalen van minstens twee onderwijsinstellingen of van minstens 1 % van de onderwijsinstellingen waarvoor de aanvrager boekhouding voert overeenkomstig artikel 6 van Gedelegeerde Verordening (EU) 2017/40 van de Commissie
 4
 , indien dit laatste een groter aantal oplevert.
 (2)Als gevolg van de maatregelen voor de bestrijding van de COVID-19-pandemie, met name de sluiting van onderwijsinstellingen en de beperking van de toegang van externe bezoekers tot hun lokalen, kunnen de lidstaten in het schooljaar 2021/2022 moeilijkheden ondervinden bij de planning en tijdige uitvoering van de controles ter plaatse in de lokalen van steunaanvragers of onderwijsinstellingen. Daarom is het passend te bepalen dat wanneer lidstaten niet in staat zijn om die controles ter plaatse te verrichten overeenkomstig artikel 10, lid 3, van Uitvoeringsverordening (EU) 2017/39, zij kunnen besluiten zulke controles ter plaatse op afstand uit te voeren, bijvoorbeeld via videoconferenties.
 (3)Artikel 10, lid 6, van Uitvoeringsverordening (EU) 2017/39 bevat de regels en methoden die van toepassing zijn op rapportage over de verrichte controles en de resultaten daarvan. Met het oog op transparantie moeten de lidstaten de noodzaak van de afwijking waarin deze verordening voorziet, rechtvaardigen in het controleverslag dat over elke op afstand verrichte controle ter plaatse moet worden opgesteld, en daarin rapporteren over het gebruik van de afwijking.
 (4)Het is dan ook passend om ten aanzien van het schooljaar 2021/2022 van een aantal bepalingen van Uitvoeringsverordening (EU) 2017/39 af te wijken.
 (5)De in deze verordening vervatte maatregelen zijn in overeenstemming met het advies van het Comité voor de gemeenschappelijke ordening van de landbouwmarkten,
 HEEFT DE VOLGENDE VERORDENING VASTGESTELD:
 Artikel 1
 1.In afwijking van artikel 10, lid 3, tweede tot en met vijfde alinea, van Uitvoeringsverordening (EU) 2017/39 mogen de lidstaten, wanneer zij wegens de maatregelen voor de bestrijding van de COVID-19-pandemie niet in staat zijn om ten aanzien van het schooljaar 2021/2022 controles ter plaatse uit te voeren in de lokalen van steunaanvragers of onderwijsinstellingen, die controles op afstand verrichten.
 2.In afwijking van artikel 10, lid 6, van Uitvoeringsverordening (EU) 2017/39 neemt de bevoegde controleautoriteit, wanneer de controles ter plaatse overeenkomstig lid 1 van dit artikel op afstand worden verricht, ook een rechtvaardiging van de noodzaak van een dergelijke afwijking op in het controleverslag en rapporteert zij daarin over het gebruik van de afwijking.
 Artikel 2
 Deze verordening treedt in werking op de derde dag na die van de bekendmaking ervan in het Publicatieblad van de Europese Unie.
 Deze verordening is verbindend in al haar onderdelen en is rechtstreeks toepasselijk in elke lidstaat.
 Gedaan te Brussel, 1.4.2022
 Voor de Commissie
 De voorzitter
 Ursula VON DER LEYEN
 (1)
 PB L 347 van 20.12.2013, blz. 549.
 (2)
 Uitvoeringsverordening (EU) 2017/39 van de Commissie van 3 november 2016 tot vaststelling van toepassingsbepalingen voor Verordening (EU) nr. 1308/2013 van het Europees Parlement en de Raad wat betreft Uniesteun voor de verstrekking van groenten, fruit, bananen en melk in onderwijsinstellingen (
 PB L 5 van 10.1.2017, blz. 1
 ).
 (3)
 Verordening (EU) nr. 1308/2013 van het Europees Parlement en de Raad van 17 december 2013 tot vaststelling van een gemeenschappelijke ordening van de markten voor landbouwproducten en tot intrekking van de Verordeningen (EEG) nr. 922/72, (EEG) nr. 234/79, (EG) nr. 1037/2001 en (EG) nr. 1234/2007 van de Raad (PB L 347 van 20.12.2013, blz. 671).
 (4)
 Gedelegeerde Verordening (EU) 2017/40 van de Commissie van 3 november 2016 tot aanvulling van Verordening (EU) nr. 1308/2013 van het Europees Parlement en de Raad, met betrekking tot Uniesteun voor de verstrekking van groenten en fruit, bananen en melk in onderwijsinstellingen en tot wijziging van Gedelegeerde Verordening (EU) nr. 907/2014 van de Commissie (PB L 5 van 10.1.2017, blz. 11).