text:
 LV
 LV LV
 ---pagebreak--- EIROPAS KOMISIJA
 Briselē, 15.6.2010
 SEC(2010) 743 galīgā redakcija
 Priekšlikums
 PADOMES LĒMUMS
 par pārmērīga budžeta deficīta pastāvēšanu Dānijā
 LV LV
 ---pagebreak--- PASKAIDROJUMA RAKSTS
 1. STABILITĀTES UN IZAUGSMES PAKTA PIEMĒROŠANA PAŠREIZĒJĀ KRĪZES SITUĀCIJĀ
 Daudzu ES valstu kopbudžeta deficīts patlaban pārsniedz Līgumā noteikto atsauces vērtību
 3 % no IKP. Uz bieži vien ievērojamo deficīta pieaugumu, kā arī uz parāda attīstību jāraugās
 nepieredzētās vispasaules 2008./2009. gada finanšu krīzes un ekonomikas lejupslīdes
 kontekstā. Jāņem vērā vairāki faktori. Pirmkārt, ekonomikas lejupslīdes rezultātā samazinās
 nodokļu ieņēmumi un pieaug sociālo pabalstu (piemēram, bezdarbnieka pabalstu) izdevumi.
 Otrkārt, ņemot vērā to, ka budžeta politikai ir svarīga nozīme ārkārtas situācijā, kas pašreiz
 valda ekonomikā, Komisija 2008. gada novembra Eiropas ekonomikas atveseļošanas plānā
 (EEAP), ko decembrī apstiprināja Eiropadome, aicināja veikt fiskālās stimulēšanas
 pasākumus. Plānā paskaidrots, ka stimulēšanas pasākumiem jābūt savlaicīgiem,
 mērķtiecīgiem, ar ierobežotu darbības laiku un katrā dalībvalstī dažādiem, lai ņemtu vērā šo
 valstu atšķirīgos stāvokļus attiecībā uz valsts finanšu ilgtspējību un konkurētspēju, un tie
 jāpārtrauc, kad ekonomikas apstākļi uzlabojas. Visbeidzot, lai stabilizētu finanšu sektoru,
 vairākas dalībvalstis ir veikušas pasākumus, no kuriem daži ir ietekmējuši parādu vai rada
 risku, ka deficīts un parāds varētu nākotnē pieaugt, lai gan dažas valstis atbalsta pasākumu
 izmaksas nākotnē varētu atgūt.
 Stabilitātes un izaugsmes paktā noteikts, ka Komisijai jāuzsāk pārmērīga budžeta deficīta
 novēršanas procedūra vienmēr, kad kādas dalībvalsts budžeta deficīts pārsniedz atsauces
 vērtību 3 % no IKP. Stabilitātes un izaugsmes paktā 2005. gadā izdarīto grozījumu mērķis
 bija jo īpaši nodrošināt to, ka situācija ekonomikā un budžeta stāvoklis ir pilnībā ņemts vērā
 visos pārmērīga budžeta deficīta novēršanas procedūras posmos. Tādējādi Stabilitātes un
 izaugsmes pakts kalpo par atbalstu valdības politikai, lai ātrāk atkal sasniegtu stabilu budžeta
 stāvokli, ņemot vērā situāciju ekonomikā, un tādējādi ilgtermiņā nodrošinātu valsts finanšu
 ilgtspējību.
 2. IEPRIEKŠĒJIE PASĀKUMI PĀRMĒRĪGA BUDŽETA DEFICĪTA NOVĒRŠANAS
 PROCEDŪRĀ
 Līguma par Eiropas Savienības darbību 126. pants paredz pārmērīga budžeta deficīta
 novēršanas procedūru. Šī procedūra ir sīkāk aprakstīta Padomes Regulā (EK) Nr. 1467/97 par
 to, kā paātrināt un precizēt pārmērīga budžeta deficīta novēršanas procedūras īstenošanu1, kas
 ietilpst Stabilitātes un izaugsmes paktā.
 Saskaņā ar Līguma 126. panta 2. punktu Komisijai jāuzrauga budžeta disciplīnas ievērošana,
 pamatojoties uz šādiem diviem kritērijiem: a) vai plānotā vai faktiskā valsts budžeta deficīta
 attiecība pret iekšzemes kopproduktu (IKP) pārsniedz atsauces vērtību 3 % (izņemot
 gadījumus, kad šī attiecība ir būtiski un pastāvīgi samazinājusies un sasniegusi atsauces
 vērtībai tuvu līmeni, vai arī ja atsauces vērtība ir pārsniegta tikai izņēmuma kārtā un uz laiku,
 un šī attiecība joprojām ir tuva atsauces vērtībai); un b) vai valsts parāda attiecība pret IKP
 1
 OV L 209, 2.8.1997., 6. lpp. Ziņojumā ņemtas vērā arī “Specifikācijas, kā īstenot Stabilitātes un
 izaugsmes paktu, un pamatnostādnes par stabilitātes un konverģences programmu formu un saturu”, ko
 Ekonomikas un finanšu padome pieņēma 2009. gada 10. novembrī (pieejamas tīmekļa vietnē
 http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/sgp/legal_texts/index_en.htm).
 LV 2 LV
 ---pagebreak--- pārsniedz atsauces vērtību 60 % (ja vien šī attiecība pietiekami strauji nesamazinās un
 netuvinās atsauces vērtībai).
 Līguma 126. panta 3. punktā paredzēts, ka tad, ja kāda dalībvalsts neatbilst viena vai abu šo
 kritēriju prasībām, Komisija sagatavo ziņojumu. Šajā ziņojumā “ņem vērā arī to, vai valsts
 budžeta deficīts pārsniedz valdības investīciju izdevumus, kā arī ņem vērā visus citus būtiskus
 faktorus, tostarp dalībvalsts ekonomikas un budžeta stāvokli vidēji ilgā laikā”.
 Pamatojoties uz datiem, ko Dānijas iestādes paziņojušas 2010. gada aprīlī2, un ņemot vērā
 Komisijas dienestu 2010. gada pavasara prognozi, Komisija 2010. gada 12. maijā saskaņā ar
 126. panta 3. punktu pieņēma ziņojumu par Dāniju3.
 Pēc tam saskaņā ar 126. panta 4. punktu 2010. gada 27. maijā Ekonomikas un finanšu
 komiteja formulēja atzinumu par Komisijas ziņojumu.
 3. PĀRMĒRĪGA BUDŽETA DEFICĪTA PASTĀVĒŠANA
 Saskaņā ar datiem, ko Dānijas iestādes paziņojušas 2010. gada aprīlī, tiek plānots, ka valsts
 kopbudžeta deficīts Dānijā sasniegs 5,4 % no IKP 2010. gadā, tādējādi pārsniedzot atsauces
 vērtību — 3 % no IKP. Saskaņā ar 126. panta 3. punktu sagatavotajā Komisijas ziņojumā
 pausts uzskats, ka plānotais deficīts nav tuvu atsauces vērtībai 3 % no IKP, bet ka plānoto
 atsauces vērtības pārsniegumu var uzskatīt par pārsniegumu izņēmuma kārtā Līgumā un
 Stabilitātes un izaugsmes paktā paredzētajā nozīmē. Tas jo īpaši ir smagas ekonomikas
 lejupslīdes rezultāts Līguma un Stabilitātes un izaugsmes pakta izpratnē. Komisijas dienestu
 2010. gada pavasara prognozē lēsts, ka pēc Dānijas reālā IKP krasā samazinājuma 4,9 %
 apmērā 2009. gadā ir sagaidāms, ka tas atgūsies par 1,6 % 2010. gadā. 2009. gada recesija
 izpaudās kā straujš privātā patēriņa, investīciju un eksporta kritums, ko izraisījusi finanšu
 krīze un pasaules ekonomikas lejupslīde, jo īpaši pieprasījuma samazināšanās no galveno
 tirdzniecības partneru puses (Vācijas, Apvienotās Karalistes, Zviedrijas un Norvēģijas).
 2010. gada budžeta deficīts ir sekas, ko izraisīja gan ekonomikas lejupslīde, gan Dānijas
 iestāžu saskaņā ar EEAP veiktie stimulēšanas pasākumi. Tomēr plānoto atsauces vērtības
 pārsniegumu nevar uzskatīt par īslaicīgu. Saskaņā ar Komisijas dienestu 2010. gada pavasara
 prognozi budžeta deficīts 2011. gadā samazinātos līdz 4,9 % no IKP, ja netiktu mainīta
 politika4. Līgumā minētais deficīta kritērijs nav izpildīts.
 Saskaņā ar datiem, ko Dānijas iestādes paziņoja 2010. gada aprīlī, valsts kopējais parāds vēl
 aizvien ir mazāks par atsauces vērtību 60 % no IKP, proti, 45,1 % no IKP 2010. gadā.
 Komisijas dienestu 2010. gada pavasara prognozē lēsts, ka parāda attiecība 2010. gadā būs
 46 % no IKP un palielināsies līdz 49,5 % no IKP 2011. gadā, joprojām nepārsniedzot atsauces
 vērtību — 60 % no IKP. Līgumā minētais parāda kritērijs ir izpildīts.
 2
 Atbilstoši Padomes Regulai (EK) Nr. 479/2009 dalībvalstīm divreiz gadā jāziņo Komisijai par plānoto
 un faktisko valsts budžeta deficīta un parāda līmeni. Jaunākie Dānijas paziņotie dati ir pieejami:
 http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/government_finance_statistics/excessive_deficit/edp_
 notification_tables.
 3
 Visi ar pārmērīga budžeta deficīta novēršanas procedūru saistītie dokumenti, kas attiecas uz Dāniju,
 pieejami šādā tīmekļa vietnē:
 http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/sgp/deficit/countries/index_en.htm.
 4
 Prognozē, kas balstīta uz pieņēmumu, ka netiek veiktas politikas izmaiņas, ņem vērā (daļējo)
 atteikšanos no ārkārtējiem ar krīzi saistītajiem pasākumiem.
 LV 3 LV
 ---pagebreak--- Saskaņā ar Līguma un Stabilitātes un izaugsmes pakta noteikumiem Komisija savā ziņojumā
 analizēja arī “būtiskos faktorus”. Saskaņā ar Stabilitātes un izaugsmes paktu, gatavojot
 lēmumu par pārmērīga budžeta deficīta pastāvēšanu, tos drīkst ņemt vērā tikai tad, ja budžeta
 deficīts vienlaikus atbilst diviem nosacījumiem — ka tas saglabājas tuvu atsauces vērtībai un
 ka atsauces vērtība tiek pārsniegta tikai uz laiku. Dānijas gadījumā šie abi nosacījumi nav
 izpildīti. Atsevišķi ņemot, būtiskie faktori konkrētajā gadījumā šķiet esam diezgan labvēlīgi.
 Saskaņā ar Līguma 126. panta 4. punktu sagatavotais Ekonomikas un finanšu komitejas
 atzinums atbilst Komisijas novērtējumam, kas iekļauts saskaņā ar Līguma 126. panta
 3. punktu sagatavotajā ziņojumā.
 Komisija, ņemot vērā savu saskaņā ar 126. panta 3. punktu sniegto ziņojumu un pamatojoties
 uz Ekonomikas un finanšu komitejas saskaņā ar 126. panta 4. punktu sniegto atzinumu,
 uzskata, ka Dānijā pastāv pārmērīgs budžeta deficīts. Šis atzinums, ko Komisija pieņēma
 [2010. gada 15. jūnijā], tiek adresēts Padomei saskaņā ar 126. panta 5. punktu. Komisija
 ierosina Padomei pieņemt attiecīgu lēmumu saskaņā ar 126.panta 6. punktu. Turklāt saskaņā
 ar 126. panta 7. punktu Komisija Padomei iesniedz ieteikumu par Padomes ieteikumu, kas
 adresējams Dānijai, lai tiktu novērsta pārmērīga valsts budžeta deficīta situācija.
 4. IETEIKUMI, LAI NOVĒRSTU PĀRMĒRĪGU BUDŽETA DEFICĪTU
 Saskaņā ar Padomes Regulas (EK) Nr. 1467/97 3. panta 4. punktu Padomes ieteikumā, kas
 izdots saskaņā ar 126. panta 7. punktu, jānosaka, ka attiecīgajai dalībvalstij ne vēlāk kā sešu
 mēnešu laikā jāveic efektīvi pasākumi, kā arī jāparedz termiņš pārmērīgā budžeta deficīta
 novēršanai — tam “jābūt pilnībā novērstam nākamajā gadā pēc tā konstatēšanas, ja vien
 nepastāv īpaši apstākļi”. Lemjot, vai pastāv īpaši apstākļi, saskaņā ar regulas 2. panta
 6. punktu jāņem vērā “būtiski faktori”, kas izskatīti atbilstīgi Līguma 126. panta 3. punktam
 sagatavotajā Komisijas ziņojumā. Regulas 3. panta 4. punktā Padomei paredzēts pienākums
 ieteikt, ka dalībvalsts “kā normu sasniedz minimālu gada uzlabojumu vismaz 0,5 % apmērā
 no IKP tās cikliski koriģētajā bilancē, izņemot vienreizējos un pagaidu pasākumus, lai
 tādējādi nodrošinātu pārmērīga budžeta deficīta novēršanu ieteikumā norādītajā termiņā”.
 Saskaņā ar Stabilitātes un izaugsmes pakta 2005. gada reformu, ar ko tika ieviesta lielāka
 elastība, piemērojot pārmērīga budžeta deficīta novēršanas procedūras noteikumus, var
 uzskatīt, ka Dānijas gadījumā pastāv īpaši apstākļi. Konkrēti, 2009. gada recesija izpaudās kā
 straujš privātā patēriņa, investīciju un eksporta kritums, ko izraisījusi finanšu krīze un
 pasaules ekonomikas lejupslīde, jo īpaši pieprasījuma samazināšanās no galveno tirdzniecības
 partneru puses (Vācijas, Apvienotās Karalistes, Zviedrijas un Norvēģijas). 2010. gada budžeta
 deficīts ir sekas, ko izraisīja gan ekonomikas lejupslīde, gan Dānijas iestāžu saskaņā ar EEAP
 veiktie stimulēšanas pasākumi.
 Ņemot vērā iepriekš minēto, ir lietderīgi apsvērt pārmērīga valsts budžeta deficīta novēršanas
 procedūru vidējā termiņā, par korekciju galīgo termiņu nosakot 2013. gadu. Atzīstot, ka
 Dānijas 2010. gada budžeta stāvokli noteica veiktie pretkrīzes pasākumi 2,2 % apmērā no IKP
 2009. gadā un 1,3 % apmērā no IKP 2010. gadā, kas bija piemērota rīcība saskaņā ar Eiropas
 ekonomikas atveseļošanas plānu, un automātisko stabilizatoru brīvā darbība, Dānijas iestādēm
 2010. gadā būtu jāīsteno paredzētie fiskālie pasākumi. Lai veiktu ticamas un ilgtspējīgas
 korekcijas, jo īpaši, ņemot vērā, ka nav izteiktas ekonomiskas nelīdzsvarotības, Dānijas
 iestādēm būtu jānodrošina vidēja ikgadēja budžeta strukturāla korekcija 1⁄2 % apmērā no IKP
 laikposmā no 2011. līdz 2013. gadam un jāprecizē pasākumi, kas nepieciešami pārmērīga
 LV 4 LV
 ---pagebreak--- budžeta deficīta novēršanai līdz 2013. gadam, ja to pieļauj cikliskie nosacījumi, un jāpaātrina
 deficīta samazināšana, ja ekonomikas vai budžeta situācija izrādās labāka, nekā sagaidāms
 pašlaik.
 Lai pārmērīga budžeta deficīta novēršanas procedūras ietvaros veiktu pastiprinātu uzraudzību,
 kas ir vajadzīga, ņemot vērā pārmērīga deficīta novēršanai noteikto termiņu, būs vajadzīga
 regulāra un savlaicīga kontrole attiecībā uz paveikto fiskālās konsolidācijas stratēģijas
 īstenošanā, lai nodrošinātu pārmērīgā deficīta novēršanu. Tāpēc Dānijas konverģences
 programmas atjauninājumos, kas tiks sagatavoti laikposmā no 2010. līdz 2013. gadam, šim
 jautājumam varētu atvēlēt atsevišķu nodaļu.
 Galveno makroekonomikas un budžeta prognožu salīdzinājums
 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
 COM 2010. g.
 1,7 -0,9 -4,9 1,6 1,8 n.p. n.p.
 Reālais IKP pavasaris
 (izmaiņas %) KP 2010. gada
 n.p. -0,9 -4,3 1,3 1,6 2,0 2,3
 februārī
 COM 2010. g.2
 2,6 0,2 -5,1 -3,9 -2,7 n.p. n.p.
 Ražošanas apjoma starpība1 pavasaris
 (% no potenciālā IKP) KP 2010. gada
 n.p. 0,3 -4,5 -3,9 -3,1 -2,0 -0,9
 februārī3
 COM 2010. g.
 4,8 3,4 -2,7 -5,5 -4,9 n.p. n.p.
 Valsts kopbudžeta bilance pavasaris
 (% no IKP) KP 2010. gada
 n.p. 3,4 -2,9 -5,3 -4,1 -3,1 -1,8
 februārī
 COM 2010. g.
 6,3 4,8 -0,7 -3,4 -2,7 n.p. n.p.
 Primārā bilance pavasaris
 (% no IKP) KP 2010. gada
 n.p. 4,8 -1,3 -3,7 -2,3 -1,2 0,3
 februārī
 COM 2010. g.
 3,1 3,3 0,6 -3,0 -3,1 n.p. n.p.
 Cikliski koriģētā bilance1 pavasaris
 (% no IKP) KP 2010. gada
 n.p. 3,2 0,0 -2,8 -2,1 -1,7 -1,1
 februārī
 COM 2010. g.
 3,1 3,3 0,6 -2,7 -3,1 n.p. n.p.
 Strukturālā bilance4 pavasaris
 (% no IKP) KP 2010. gada
 n.p. 3,2 1,4 -1,1 -1,0 -0,8 -0,3
 februārī
 COM 2010. g.
 27,4 34,2 41,6 46,0 49,5 n.p. n.p.
 Valsts kopējais parāds pavasaris
 (% no IKP) KP 2010. gada
 n.p. 33,4 38,5 41,8 46,2 48,3 48,1
 februārī
 Piezīmes:
 1
 Komisijas dienestu veikts programmās norādītā ražošanas apjomu starpības un cikliski koriģēto bilanču pārrēķins,
 balstoties uz programmās sniegto informāciju.
 2
 Pamatojoties uz attiecīgi 1,4 %, 0,6 %, 0,5 % un 0,9 % lēsto potenciālo pieaugumu laikā no 2008. līdz 2011. gadam.
 3
 Pamatojoties uz attiecīgi 1,4 %, 0,6 %, 0,5 % un 0,9 % lēsto potenciālo pieaugumu laikā no 2008. līdz 2011. gadam.
 4
 Cikliski koriģētā bilance, izņemot vienreizējus un citus pagaidu pasākumus. Vienreizējie un citi pagaidu pasākumi veido
 1,4 % no IKP 2009. gadā, 1,7 % 2010. gadā, 1,1 % 2011. gadā, 0,9 % 2012. gadā, 0,8 % 2013. gadā un 0,0 % 2015. gadā;
 saskaņā ar jaunāko programmu visi samazina deficītu, un saskaņā ar Komisijas dienestu 2010. gada pavasara prognozi
 samazina deficītu 0,2 % apmērā no IKP 2010. gadā. Metodoloģiju atšķirību dēļ programmā iekļautie vienreizējie
 pasākumi neatbilst Komisijas dienestu pieņemtajam vienreizēju pasākumu definējumam. Piemērojot šo definīciju,
 vienreizējie pasākumi veidotu 0,2 % no IKP deficīta samazinājuma 2010. gadā un nulle procentus atlikušajos gados.
 Avots:
 Konverģences programma (KP); Komisijas dienestu 2010. gada pavasara prognoze (COM); Komisijas dienestu aprēķini.
 LV 5 LV
 ---pagebreak--- Priekšlikums
 PADOMES LĒMUMS
 par pārmērīga budžeta deficīta pastāvēšanu Dānijā
 EIROPAS SAVIENĪBAS PADOME,
 ņemot vērā Līgumu par Eiropas Savienības darbību un jo īpaši tā 126. panta 6. punktu,
 ņemot vērā Eiropas Komisijas priekšlikumu,
 ņemot vērā Dānijas apsvērumus,
 tā kā:
 (1) Saskaņā ar Līguma par Eiropas Savienības darbību 126. pantu dalībvalstīm jāizvairās
 no pārmērīga valsts budžeta deficīta.
 (2) Stabilitātes un izaugsmes pakta mērķis ir sakārtotas valsts finanses kā līdzeklis, lai
 nostiprinātu nosacījumus stabilām cenām un stiprai, stabilai izaugsmei, kas veicina
 nodarbinātības kāpumu.
 (3) Pārmērīga budžeta deficīta novēršanas procedūra, ko regulē Līguma 126. pants, kuru
 sīkāk izskaidro Padomes Regula (EK) Nr. 1467/97 par to, kā paātrināt un precizēt
 pārmērīga budžeta deficīta novēršanas procedūras īstenošanu5 (kas ir Stabilitātes un
 izaugsmes pakta sastāvdaļa), paredz pieņemt lēmumu par pārmērīga budžeta deficīta
 pastāvēšanu. Līgumam pievienotajā Protokolā par pārmērīga budžeta deficīta
 novēršanas procedūru ir izklāstīti citi noteikumi par pārmērīga budžeta deficīta
 novēršanas procedūras īstenošanu. Padomes Regulā (EK) Nr. 479/20096 paredzēti sīki
 izstrādāti noteikumi un definīcijas par to, kā piemērot minētā protokola noteikumus.
 (4) Ar Stabilitātes un izaugsmes pakta 2005. gada reformu tika meklētas iespējas uzlabot
 efektivitāti un ekonomisko pamatojumu, kā arī ilgstoši saglabāt valsts finanšu
 ilgtspējību. Tā mērķis bija jo īpaši nodrošināt, lai ekonomikas un budžeta stāvoklis
 būtu pilnībā ņemts vērā visos pārmērīga budžeta deficīta novēršanas procedūras
 posmos. Tādējādi Stabilitātes un izaugsmes pakts kalpo par atbalstu valdības politikai,
 lai ātrāk atkal sasniegtu stabilu budžeta stāvokli, ņemot vērā situāciju ekonomikā.
 (5) Līguma 126. panta 5. punktā noteikts, ka Komisija adresē Padomei atzinumu, ja
 Komisija uzskata, ka dalībvalstī pastāv vai var rasties pārmērīgs budžeta deficīts.
 5
 OV L 209, 2.8.1997., 6. lpp.
 6
 OV L 145, 10.6.2009., 1. lpp.
 LV 6 LV
 ---pagebreak--- Komisija, ņēmusi vērā savu ziņojumu saskaņā ar 126. panta 3. punktu un balstoties uz
 Ekonomikas un finanšu komitejas atzinumu saskaņā ar 126. panta 4. punktu, ir
 secinājusi, ka Dānijā pastāv pārmērīgs budžeta deficīts. Tāpēc Komisija ir adresējusi
 Padomei šādu atzinumu par Dāniju [2010. gada 15. jūnijā]7.
 (6) Līguma 126. panta 6. punktā noteikts, ka Padomei ir jāizskata jebkādi apsvērumi, ko,
 iespējams, vēlētos iesniegt attiecīgā dalībvalsts, un tad, pamatojoties uz vispārēju
 novērtējumu, jāpieņem lēmums par to, vai pastāv pārmērīgs budžeta deficīts. Dānijas
 gadījumā šā vispārējā novērtējuma rezultātā ir pieņemti turpmāk minētie secinājumi.
 (7) Saskaņā ar datiem, ko Dānijas iestādes paziņoja 2010. gada aprīlī, tiek plānots, ka
 valsts kopbudžeta deficīts Dānijā sasniegs 5,4 % no IKP 2010. gadā, tādējādi
 pārsniedzot atsauces vērtību — 3 % no IKP. Plānotais deficīts nav tuvu atsauces
 vērtībai 3 % no IKP, bet plānoto atsauces vērtības pārsniegumu var uzskatīt par
 pārsniegumu izņēmuma kārtā Līgumā un Stabilitātes un izaugsmes paktā paredzētajā
 nozīmē. Tas jo īpaši ir smagas ekonomikas lejupslīdes rezultāts Līguma un Stabilitātes
 un izaugsmes pakta izpratnē. Komisijas dienestu 2010. gada pavasara prognozē lēsts,
 ka reālais Dānijas IKP 2009. gadā saruka par 4,9 %, un ir sagaidāms, ka 2010. gadā tas
 atgūsies par 1,6 %. 2010. gada budžeta deficīts ir sekas, ko izraisīja gan ekonomikas
 lejupslīde, gan Dānijas iestāžu saskaņā ar EEAP veiktie stimulēšanas pasākumi.
 Tomēr plānoto atsauces vērtības pārsniegumu nevar uzskatīt par īslaicīgu. Saskaņā ar
 Komisijas dienestu 2010. gada pavasara prognozi budžeta deficīts 2011. gadā
 samazinātos līdz 4,9 % no IKP, ja netiktu mainīta politika8. Līgumā minētais deficīta
 kritērijs nav izpildīts.
 (8) Saskaņā ar datiem, ko Dānijas iestādes paziņoja 2010. gada aprīlī, valsts kopējais
 parāds vēl aizvien ir mazāks par atsauces vērtību 60 % no IKP, proti, 45,1 % no IKP
 2010. gadā. Komisijas dienestu 2010. gada pavasara prognozē lēsts, ka parāda
 attiecība 2010. gadā būs 46 % no IKP un palielināsies līdz 49,5 % no IKP 2011. gadā,
 joprojām nepārsniedzot atsauces vērtību — 60 % no IKP. Līgumā minētais parāda
 kritērijs ir izpildīts.
 (9) Gatavojot Padomes lēmumu par pārmērīga budžeta deficīta pastāvēšanu atbilstīgi
 126. panta 6. punktam, “būtiskos faktorus” saskaņā ar Padomes Regulas (EK)
 Nr. 1467/97 2. panta 4. punktu drīkst ņemt vērā tikai tad, ja vienlaikus ir pilnībā
 izpildīti divi nosacījumi, proti, ka budžeta deficīts joprojām saglabājas tuvu atsauces
 vērtībai un ka atsauces vērtība tiek pārsniegta tikai uz laiku. Dānijas gadījumā šie abi
 nosacījumi nav izpildīti. Tāpēc šā lēmuma pieņemšanas gaitā nav ņemti vērā būtiskie
 faktori,
 IR PIEŅĒMUSI ŠO LĒMUMU.
 1. pants
 No vispārējā novērtējuma izriet, ka Dānijā pastāv pārmērīgs budžeta deficīts.
 7
 Visi ar pārmērīga budžeta deficīta novēršanas procedūru saistītie dokumenti, kas attiecas uz Dāniju,
 pieejami šādā tīmekļa vietnē:
 http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/sgp/deficit/countries/index_en.htm.
 8
 Prognozē, kas balstīta uz pieņēmumu, ka netiek veiktas politikas izmaiņas, ņem vērā (daļējo)
 atteikšanos no ārkārtējiem ar krīzi saistītajiem pasākumiem.
 LV 7 LV
 ---pagebreak--- 2. pants
 Šis lēmums ir adresēts Dānijas Karalistei.
 Briselē,
 Padomes vārdā —
 priekšsēdētājs
 [...]
 LV 8 LV


type: legislation

jurisdiction: EU

text:
 6.6.2019
 SK
 Úradný vestník Európskej únie
 L 148/1
 VYKONÁVACIE NARIADENIE KOMISIE (EÚ) 2019/921
 z 3. júna 2019
 o zatriedení určitého tovaru do kombinovanej nomenklatúry
 EURÓPSKA KOMISIA,
 so zreteľom na Zmluvu o fungovaní Európskej únie,
 so zreteľom na nariadenie Európskeho parlamentu a Rady (EÚ) č. 952/2013 z 9. októbra 2013, ktorým sa ustanovuje Colný kódex Únie (1), a najmä na jeho článok 57 ods. 4 a článok 58 ods. 2,
 keďže:
 (1)
 S cieľom zabezpečiť jednotné uplatňovanie kombinovanej nomenklatúry, ktorá tvorí prílohu k nariadeniu Rady (EHS) č. 2658/87 (2), je potrebné prijať opatrenia týkajúce sa zatriedenia tovaru uvedeného v prílohe k tomuto nariadeniu.
 (2)
 V nariadení (EHS) č. 2658/87 sa stanovili všeobecné pravidlá na interpretáciu kombinovanej nomenklatúry. Tieto pravidlá sa takisto uplatňujú na akúkoľvek inú nomenklatúru, ktorá sa na kombinovanej nomenklatúre celkovo alebo čiastočne zakladá alebo ktorá k nej pridáva akékoľvek ďalšie rozdelenie a ktorá je stanovená v osobitných ustanoveniach Únie s ohľadom na uplatňovanie colných a iných opatrení vzťahujúcich sa na obchod s tovarom.
 (3)
 Podľa uvedených všeobecných pravidiel by sa tovar opísaný v stĺpci 1 tabuľky uvedenej v prílohe mal zatriediť pod číselný znak KN uvedený v stĺpci 2 na základe odôvodnenia uvedeného v stĺpci 3 danej tabuľky.
 (4)
 Je potrebné umožniť, aby sa držiteľ záväzných informácií o nomenklatúrnom zatriedení tovaru vydaných v súvislosti s tovarom, na ktorý sa vzťahuje toto nariadenie, ktoré nie sú v súlade s týmto nariadením, mohol na tieto informácie aj naďalej odvolávať počas určitého obdobia v súlade s článkom 34 ods. 9 nariadenia (EÚ) č. 952/2013. Toto obdobie by malo byť stanovené na tri mesiace.
 (5)
 Opatrenia stanovené v tomto nariadení sú v súlade so stanoviskom Výboru pre colný kódex,
 PRIJALA TOTO NARIADENIE:
 Článok 1
 Tovar opísaný v stĺpci 1 tabuľky uvedenej v prílohe sa zatriedi v rámci kombinovanej nomenklatúry pod číselný znak KN uvedený v stĺpci 2 tejto tabuľky.
 Článok 2
 Na záväzné informácie o nomenklatúrnom zatriedení tovaru, ktoré nie sú v súlade s týmto nariadením, je možné odvolávať sa aj naďalej v súlade s článkom 34 ods. 9 nariadenia (EÚ) č. 952/2013 počas troch mesiacov odo dňa nadobudnutia účinnosti tohto nariadenia.
 Článok 3
 Toto nariadenie nadobúda účinnosť dvadsiatym dňom po jeho uverejnení v Úradnom vestníku Európskej únie.
 Toto nariadenie je záväzné v celom rozsahu a priamo uplatniteľné vo všetkých členských štátoch.
 V Bruseli 3. júna 2019
 Za Komisiu
 v mene predsedu
 Stephen QUEST
 generálny riaditeľ
 Generálne riaditeľstvo pre dane a colnú úniu
 (1) Ú. v. EÚ L 269, 10.10.2013, s. 1.
 (2) Nariadenie Rady (EHS) č. 2658/87 z 23. júla 1987 o colnej a štatistickej nomenklatúre a o Spoločnom colnom sadzobníku (Ú. v. ES L 256, 7.9.1987, s. 1).
 PRÍLOHA
 Opis tovaru
 Zatriedenie
 (číselný znak KN)
 Odôvodnenie
 (1)
 (2)
 (3)
 Výrobok vo forme tabliet, obsahujúci 400 mg látky S-Adenozyl–L-Metionín disulfát-p-toluénsulfonát, ktorého účinnou látkou je S-Adenozyl–L-Metionín.
 Výrobok obsahuje aj menšie množstvá mikrokryštalickej celulózy, hydroxidu horečnatého, kyseliny stearovej, stearátu horečnatého, koloidného oxidu kremičitého bezvodého, oxidu vápenatého a poťahových zložiek.
 Výrobok sa predkladá na použitie ako potravinový doplnok, ktorý uľahčuje normálnu funkciu pečene, pomáha pri telesných detoxikačných procesoch a vo všeobecnosti podporuje dobré emocionálne zdravie.
 Odporúčaná denná dávka je jedna tableta. Výrobok sa predkladá voľne ložený.
 2106 90 92
 Zatriedenie je určené všeobecnými pravidlami 1 a 6 na interpretáciu kombinovanej nomenklatúry, doplnkovou poznámkou 5 k 21. kapitole a znením číselných znakov KN 2106 , 2106 90 a 2106 90 92 .
 Obsah účinnej látky S-Adenozyl–L-Metionín v jednej tablete nie je vhodný na prevenciu a liečbu chorôb alebo ochorení. Zatriedenie do položky 3004 je preto vylúčené.
 Výrobok je preto potravinový prípravok inde nešpecifikovaný ani nezahrnutý (pozri aj vysvetlivky k harmonizovanému systému k položke 2106 , druhý odsek, bod 16).
 Výrobok sa preto má zatriediť pod číselný znak KN 2106 90 92 ako potravinový prípravok inde nešpecifikovaný ani nezahrnutý.


type: caselaw

text:
 10.9.2011
 CS
 Úřední věstník Evropské unie
 C 269/35
 Žádost o rozhodnutí o předběžné otázce podaná Tribunal administratif de Montreuil (Francie) dne 4. července 2011 — Continental Small Company Series of the DFA Investment Trust Co. v. Ministre du budget, des comptes publics, de la fonction publique et de la réforme de l'État
 (Věc C-345/11)
 2011/C 269/71
 Jednací jazyk: francouzština
 Předkládající soud
 Tribunal administratif de Montreuil
 Účastnçci původního řízení
 Žalobkyně: Continental Small Company Series of the DFA Investment Trust Co.
 Žalované: Ministre du budget, des comptes publics, de la fonction publique et de la réforme de l’État
 Předběžné otázky
 1)
 Musí být vedle situace subjektů kolektivního investování do převoditelných cenných papírů (SKIPCP) brána v úvahu i situace podílníků?
 2)
 Je-li tomu tak, za jakých podmínek lze srážkovou daň považovat za slučitelnou se zásadou volného pohybu kapitálu?


type: contracts

text:
 23.7.2011
 SK
 Úradný vestník Európskej únie
 L 193/52
 ROZHODNUTIE VÝBORU PRE VNÚTROZEMSKÚ DOPRAVU SPOLOČENSTVA A ŠVAJČIARSKA č. 1/2011
 z 10. júna 2011
 týkajúce sa poskytnutia zľavy z poplatku za prepravu ťažkými nákladnými vozidlami vypočítaného na základe vykonaných služieb pre vozidlá emisných tried EURO II a III vybavené homologovaným systémom filtrovania tuhých častíc
 (2011/455/EÚ)
 VÝBOR,
 so zreteľom na Dohodu medzi Európskym spoločenstvom a Švajčiarskou konfederáciou o železničnej a cestnej preprave tovaru a cestujúcich, a najmä na jej článok 51 ods. 2,
 keďže:
 (1)
 Podľa článku 40 Švajčiarsko vyberá od 1. januára 2001 nediskriminačný poplatok za vozidlá na pokrytie nákladov, ktoré spôsobujú (poplatok za prepravu nákladnými vozidlami vypočítaný na základe vykonaných služieb).
 (2)
 Podľa článku 44 majú zmluvné strany za cieľ zaviesť ekologické opatrenia, aby znížili okrem iného množstvo tuhých častíc vypúšťaných z ťažkých nákladných vozidiel.
 (3)
 V súlade s článkom 7 ods. 5 sa každá zmluvná strana zaviazala, že vozidlá homologizované na území druhej zmluvnej strany nevystaví prísnejším podmienkam, ako sú platné podmienky na jej vlastnom území,
 SA ROZHODOL TAKTO:
 Článok 1
 Vozidlám emisných tried EURO II a EURO III, ktoré sú spätne vybavené homologizovaným systémom filtrov tuhých častíc a v prípade ktorých sú splnené ustanovenia článkov 2 a 3, sa udeľuje zľava 10 % v porovnaní s ich kategóriou poplatkov.
 Článok 2
 Zľava uvedená v článku 1 sa poskytuje iba vozidlám, ktorým vnútroštátne orgány zapísali do povolenia na prevádzku alebo iného rovnocenného osvedčenia potvrdenie, že vozidlo bolo spätne vybavené homologizovaným systémom filtrovania tuhých častíc, ktorý v súlade s právnymi predpismi Švajčiarska alebo členského štátu, v ktorom je vozidlo zaevidované, umožňuje dodržiavať aspoň obmedzenú hodnotu emisií tuhých častíc zodpovedajúcu emisnej triede normy EURO IV, t. j. hmotnosti častíc (PM) 0,02 g/kWh.
 Článok 3
 Bez toho, aby bol dotknutý článok 2, sa príslušné orgány členského štátu EÚ, v ktorom je vozidlo zaevidované, snažia doručiť švajčiarskym orgánom do 30. septembra 2011 vzorku zápisu systému filtrov pevných častíc do povolenia na prevádzku alebo iného rovnocenného osvedčenia a dodať potvrdenie, že táto vzorka zaručuje dodržiavanie obmedzenej hodnoty emisií tuhých častíc normy EURO IV.
 Článok 4
 Príslušné švajčiarske orgány si vyhradzujú právo kontrolovať dodržiavanie obmedzenej hodnoty emisií tuhých častíc stanovenej v článku 2 pri všetkých ťažkých nákladných vozidlách s filtrom tuhých častíc, ktorým sa poskytla zľava z poplatku.
 Článok 5
 Toto rozhodnutie nadobúda účinnosť 1. januára 2012.
 V Bruseli 10. júna 2011
 Predseda
 Enrico GRILLO PASQUARELLI
 Vedúci švajčiarskej delegácie
 Peter FÜGLISTALER


type: wikipedia

text:
Gunnar Graps-Grāfs (27 November 1951 – 17 May 2004) was a popular Estonian musician and one of the pioneers of hard rock in Estonia and Soviet Union. He has sold hundreds of thousands of records all over the world and in 2004 Graps was given a lifetime award at Estonian Music Awards. He has been compared to Mick Jagger and Alice Cooper, both who were his own personal idols, and is often called Raudmees (Iron Man).
 Biography
 Start of music career, 1960s
 Gunnar Graps was born to Latvian conductor, cellist and musical pedagogue Igors Graps and his Estonian wife Salme in Tallinn. Graps was inspired to turn to music by his father at the age of six when he started to learn cello. In 1964, being only 13, he joined his first band Satelliidid as a guitarist. In spring of 1967 Graps joined Mikronid, where he played drums for the next six years. In 1970–1972 he was in the army and during that period he performed with Ivo Linna. He spent another year behind the drums in Mikronid after his return from military service. In spring 1968 Jüri Lina recorded about ten Mikronid's songs which also included Graps' creation for his show "Pobifo Revüü".
 Golden-Age of his music, 1970s
 After leaving the group Mikronid Graps created Ornament in 1973, which was one of the pioneers of hard rock in Estonia and the Soviet Union (Estonia was part of the USSR at the time). Ornament's music was influenced by Led Zeppelin and psychedelic rock. In 1976 Graps put together a new outfit called Magnetic Band which was Jazz-rock oriented, with reggae and funk-soul influences.
 In 1977 Graps graduated from Tallinn Music School, from the percussion instruments department. Soon after that he reformed his group and they started leaning towards hard rock. Soon Magnetic Band became one of the most popular heavy-music bands in the Soviet Union. They won first prize at the first official rock-festival of the Soviet Union which took place in Tbilisi thanks to their hit "Lady Blues" and became the stars of Yerevan-81 international pop-rock-festival. "Garbed in fire-engine red pants and white shirt decorated with a splashy 7-Up emblem, Graps sang: "Since we have nowhere else to make love/we do it out in the open/And sometimes the rain washes away the makeup/from her face—and mine", wrote Time magazine in 1981.
 At the top, 1980s
 His popularity peaked in the 1980s. Magnetic Band constantly toured the Soviet Union. In 1982, Washington Post dedicated a whole page to Gunnar Graps and the Magnetic Band. It was no surprise that in 1983 Magnetic Band got banned by the Soviet authorities, which led to creation of GGG (Gunnar Graps Group). The change also marked a shift towards straightforward hard rock and heavy metal, genres which Magnetic Band were already flirting with (Note: all the musical groups in Soviet Union had to be evaluated before they were allowed to perform or exist at all).
 New winds began to blow in the Soviet Union as Mikhail Gorbachev took the seat of the General Secretary of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union and GGG experienced less resistance from authorities. In 1988 they released their only LP entitled Põlemine (Burning). The vinyl was issued by Melodiya, a Soviet record company – the only one in the whole USSR. Distribution of the record was very high. At the time, GGG consisted of Gunnar Graps (drums, percussion, vocals, keyboards), Juri Stihhanov (lead guitar), Andres Aak (now known as Angela Aak, rhythm guitar), Jüri Roosa (bass guitar) and Tiit Altosaar (drums on some songs, as Graps tended to perform most drumming (along with singing) himself). They performed in Estonia and the rest of the Soviet Union and were very popular until their fade in the end of decade. Their most popular songs were "Põlemine" (Burning), "Valgus" (Light), the ballad "Mosaiik" (Mosaic), "Raudmees" (Iron Man) – a song which gave Graps his nickname.
 As the grip on the Baltic states became less of a strangle-hold, the Singing Revolution began to take shape.
 In 1987 a choir composed of well-known Estonian singers, Gunnar Graps among them, recorded Alo Mattiisen's song "Ei ole üksi ükski maa", a patriotic song about Estonia.
 In 1989 Gunnar Graps moved to the United States in the hopes of reaching new heights with his musical career but, alas, failed to reach those previous lofty heights and was compelled to work as a repairman – to "make ends meet".
 Start of decline, 1990s
 After Estonia regained its independence in 1991, Graps returned to his homeland. In the summer of 1993, he was caught, while working as a DJ at the nightclub on the ferryboat "Estonia", trying to cross the Swedish border with anabolic steroids and was imprisoned for two months in Sweden. He did not complain about his imprisonment; in fact, he praised the jail as being better than restaurants in Estonia. After his release, Graps came back to Estonia. Financial problems arose once more and he was compelled to work at local radio stations and night-clubs as a DJ, playing music he hated. In 1995, Graps released "Tühjad pihud" (Empty Hands) and reformed GGG the next year, performing about once a month. Graps was becoming more and more depressed.
 Last years
 Starting in the 21st century, Graps was still having financial troubles and performed in a series of Hansapank pension fund commercials. The commercials included a word play of "Tühjad pihud" (Empty Hands) record. In 2002, a 3 CD collection of Gunnar Graps' music, from all his tenures with past bands, was released as part of "Eesti kullafond" (Estionian Gold Fund) series. In 2003, Gunnar Graps performed at one of his last big concerts before death. An incarnation of Magnetic Band played in front of approx. 600 people at Green Christmas Festival in Rakvere, Estonia.
 Despite his health problems, Graps did not want to give up on music and in 2003 he released "Rajalt maas" (Off the Track), which had a strong blues influence. In one of his last interviews Graps promised to go on tour in Russia, because he was disappointed in the local music scene. Three months before his death he was still looking forward to continue his career and in an interview for Sakala, an Estonian newspaper, he promised to release a new album by the end of 2004 and another record in 2005. On 17 May 2004, at the age of 52, Gunnar Graps died of a heart attack at his home on Mooni street in Tallinn.
 Legacy
 Gunnar Graps is considered a rock idol by Estonians. Another popular Estonian band Metsatöll has said that Gunnar Graps means the same to Estonian metal as Black Sabbath means to the world.
 Also, numerous tribute events have spawned, paying homage to the early departed musician. These events are orchestrated by Radio Mania, a local radio station, and Hard Rock Club, local events promoter and take place around Graps' birthday month and death month. A string of local bands usually perform at the event along with incarnations of GGG or Magnetic Band, with people Graps used to play with. Gunnar Graps was inducted into the Hall Of Fame of Rock Cafe, a local pub (operated by the owners of Radio Mania, also the place where the tribute events take place), on 17 May 2005.
 In December 2005, Hard Rock Club started collecting funds to erect a memorial headstone at Graps' grave. A fund-rising concert was held on 5 March 2006 at Rock Cafe in Tallinn. The stone was designed by Graps' son Jan Graps and placed on his grave at Rahumäe cemetery on 17 May 2006.
 A cover band – Gunnar's Roses – was also active at some point during 2005–2006, performing at Hard Rock Laager in 2005 (a heavy metal festival created by Hard Rock Club) and at smaller pubs. The band was put together by Henri "Suss" Hinno (drummer of Manatark and Must Missa) who took the role of the drummer. Hinno is known to be a big fan of Graps' work and sang "Mosaiik" live with Gunnar's Roses.
 In 2011, dramatist Ivar Põllu's play Raudmees. Odysseuse eksirännakud, which focuses of the life of Graps, was performed at the New Tartu Theatre in Tartu. Directed by Robert Annus, the play featured actor Juss Haasma as Graps and a musical score that consisted of many of Graps' most well-known songs.
 Singing style
 Gunnar Graps' singing style was somewhat similar to the style James Hetfield of Metallica used to have, which was essentially trying to sing from the throat to produce a raspier sound. A very busy schedule contributed to the development of his signature rasp. It was not uncommon for Graps to perform even 3 shows per day and 25 days in a month. He was still able to produce very high notes, as is evident from his songs and Jesus Christ Superstar song "Gethsamen", which is included on the Gunnar Graps – Eesti kullafond 4. He is known to have trained his voice by yelling at walls; he usually did it before going on stage.
 Partial discography
 Magnetic Band
 Magnetic Band, (1978, EP) Issued by soviet record company Melodjia
 Roosid papale (Roses for Papa) (1981, LP) Issued by Melodija
 GGG
 Põlemine (Burning) (1988, LP) Issued by Melodija
 Solo
 Tühjad pihud (Empty Hands) (1995, CD) Issued by Elwood
 Rajalt maas (Off the Track) (2003, CD/MC) Issued by Elwood
 Compilation
 Gunnar Graps – Eesti kullafond 4 (2002, 3CD/3MC) TT Rec
 References
 Further reading
 (in Russian) A. Alexeev, A. Burlaka, A. Sidorov Who's Who in the Soviet rock, M., Ostankino Publishing, 1991
 External links
 Videos
 , performed at Tartu Levimuusikapäevad in 1987
 1951 births
 2004 deaths
 Estonian rock musicians
 People from Tartu
 Burials at Rahumäe Cemetery
 Estonian people of Latvian descent
 20th-century Estonian male singers
 Tallinn Georg Ots Music School alumni


text:
 31.10.2013
 FR
 Journal officiel de l'Union européenne
 L 291/6
 DÉCISION DU COMITÉ MIXTE DE L’EEE
 No 55/2013
 du 3 mai 2013
 modifiant l’annexe I (questions vétérinaires et phytosanitaires) et l’annexe II (réglementations techniques, normes, essais et certification) de l’accord EEE
 LE COMITÉ MIXTE DE L’EEE,
 vu l’accord sur l’Espace économique européen (ci-après l’«accord EEE»), et notamment son article 98,
 considérant ce qui suit:
 (1)
 Le règlement (UE) no 880/2011 de la Commission du 2 septembre 2011 rectifiant le règlement (UE) no 208/2011 modifiant l’annexe VII du règlement (CE) no 882/2004 du Parlement européen et du Conseil, les règlements de la Commission (CE) no 180/2008 et (CE) no 737/2008 en ce qui concerne les listes et les dénominations des laboratoires de référence de l’Union européenne (1) doit être intégré dans l’accord EEE.
 (2)
 La présente décision concerne la législation relative aux animaux vivants autres que les poissons et les animaux d’aquaculture. Cette législation ne s’applique pas à l’Islande, comme cela est précisé au paragraphe 2 de la partie introductive du chapitre I de l’annexe I de l’accord EEE. La partie de cette décision qui concerne le chapitre I de l’annexe I ne s’applique donc pas à l’Islande.
 (3)
 La présente décision concerne la législation relative aux questions vétérinaires. Cette législation ne s’applique pas au Liechtenstein aussi longtemps que l’application de l’accord entre la Communauté européenne et la Confédération suisse relatif aux échanges de produits agricoles est étendue au Liechtenstein, comme cela est précisé dans les adaptations sectorielles de l’annexe I de l’accord EEE. La présente décision ne s’applique donc pas au Liechtenstein.
 (4)
 Il convient, dès lors, de modifier les annexes I et II de l’accord EEE en conséquence,
 A ADOPTÉ LA PRÉSENTE DÉCISION:
 Article premier
 L’annexe I de l’accord EEE est modifiée comme suit:
 1)
 La mention suivante est ajoutée au sixième tiret [règlement (UE) no 208/2011 de la Commission] du point 11 [règlement (CE) no 882/2004 du Parlement européen et du Conseil] de la partie 1.1 du chapitre I:
 «, modifié par:
 —
 32011 R 0880: règlement (UE) no 880/2011 de la Commission du 2 septembre 2011 (JO L 228 du 3.9.2011, p. 8).»
 2)
 La mention suivante est ajoutée au premier tiret [règlement (UE) no 208/2011 de la Commission] du point 41 [règlement (CE) no 737/2008 de la Commission] de la partie 3.2 du chapitre I:
 «, modifié par:
 —
 32011 R 0880: règlement (UE) no 880/2011 de la Commission du 2 septembre 2011 (JO L 228 du 3.9.2011, p. 8).»
 3)
 La mention suivante est ajoutée au premier tiret [règlement (UE) no 208/2011 de la Commission] du point 90 [règlement (CE) no 180/2008 de la Commission] de la partie 4.2 du chapitre I:
 «, modifié par:
 —
 32011 R 0880: règlement (UE) no 880/2011 de la Commission du 2 septembre 2011 (JO L 228 du 3.9.2011, p. 8).»
 4)
 La mention suivante est ajoutée au quatrième tiret [règlement (UE) no 208/2011 de la Commission] du point 31 j [règlement (CE) no 882/2004 du Parlement européen et du Conseil] du chapitre II:
 «, modifié par:
 —
 32011 R 0880: règlement (UE) no 880/2011 de la Commission du 2 septembre 2011 (JO L 228 du 3.9.2011, p. 8).»
 Article 2
 La mention suivante est ajoutée au quatrième tiret [règlement (UE) no 208/2011 de la Commission] du point 54zzzi [règlement (CE) no 882/2004 du Parlement européen et du Conseil] du chapitre XII de l’annexe II de l’accord:
 «, modifié par:
 —
 32011 R 0880: règlement (UE) no 880/2011 de la Commission du 2 septembre 2011 (JO L 228 du 3.9.2011, p. 8).»
 Article 3
 Les textes du règlement (UE) no 880/2011 en langues islandaise et norvégienne, à publier dans le supplément EEE du Journal officiel de l’Union européenne, font foi.
 Article 4
 La présente décision entre en vigueur le 4 mai 2013, pour autant que toutes les notifications prévues à l’article 103, paragraphe 1, de l’accord EEE aient été faites (2).
 Article 5
 La présente décision est publiée dans la partie EEE et dans le supplément EEE du Journal officiel de l’Union européenne.
 Fait à Bruxelles, le 3 mai 2013.
 Par le Comité mixte de l’EEE
 Le président
 Gianluca GRIPPA
 (1) JO L 228 du 3.9.2011, p. 8.
 (2) Pas d’obligations constitutionnelles signalées.


text:
 16.4.2015
 RO
 Jurnalul Oficial al Uniunii Europene
 L 99/4
 REGULAMENTUL DE PUNERE ÎN APLICARE (UE) 2015/592 AL COMISIEI
 din 14 aprilie 2015
 de aprobare a unei modificări care nu este minoră a caietului de sarcini aferent unei denumiri înregistrate în Registrul denumirilor de origine protejate și al indicațiilor geografice protejate [Presunto de Barrancos/Paleta de Barrancos (DOP)]
 COMISIA EUROPEANĂ,
 având în vedere Tratatul privind funcționarea Uniunii Europene,
 având în vedere Regulamentul (UE) nr. 1151/2012 al Parlamentului European și al Consiliului din 21 noiembrie 2012 privind sistemele din domeniul calității produselor agricole și alimentare (1), în special articolul 52 alineatul (2),
 întrucât:
 (1)
 În conformitate cu articolul 53 alineatul (1) primul paragraf din Regulamentul (UE) nr. 1151/2012, Comisia a examinat cererea Portugaliei de aprobare a unei modificări a caietului de sarcini al denumirii de origine protejate „Presunto de Barrancos”, înregistrată în temeiul Regulamentului (CE) nr. 2400/96 al Comisiei (2).
 (2)
 Întrucât modificarea în cauză nu este minoră în sensul articolului 53 alineatul (2) din Regulamentul (UE) nr. 1151/2012, Comisia a publicat cererea de modificare, în conformitate cu articolul 50 alineatul (2) litera (a) din respectivul regulament, în Jurnalul Oficial al Uniunii Europene
 (3).
 (3)
 Întrucât Comisiei nu i s-a comunicat nicio declarație de opoziție în conformitate cu articolul 51 din Regulamentul (UE) nr. 1151/2012, modificarea caietului de sarcini ar trebui aprobată,
 ADOPTĂ PREZENTUL REGULAMENT:
 Articolul 1
 Modificarea caietului de sarcini, publicată în Jurnalul Oficial al Uniunii Europene, privind denumirea „Presunto de Barrancos”/„Paleta de Barrancos” (DOP) este aprobată.
 Articolul 2
 Prezentul regulament intră în vigoare în a douăzecea zi de la data publicării în Jurnalul Oficial al Uniunii Europene.
 Prezentul regulament este obligatoriu în toate elementele sale și se aplică direct în toate statele membre.
 Adoptat la Bruxelles, 14 aprilie 2015.
 Pentru Comisie,
 pentru președinte
 Phil HOGAN
 Membru al Comisiei
 (1) JO L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.
 (2) Regulamentul (CE) nr. 2400/96 al Comisiei din 17 decembrie 1996 privind înscrierea anumitor denumiri în „Registrul denumirilor de origine protejate și al indicațiilor geografice protejate”, prevăzut în Regulamentul (CEE) nr. 2081/92 al Consiliului privind protecția indicațiilor geografice și a denumirilor de origine ale produselor agricole și alimentare (JO L 327, 18.12.1996, p. 11).
 (3) JO C 432, 2.12.2014, p. 16.


text:
 26.5.2007
 FR
 Journal officiel de l'Union européenne
 C 117/31
 Recours introduit le 26 mars 2007 — EREF/Commission
 (Affaire T-94/07)
 (2007/C 117/50)
 Langue de procédure: l'anglais
 Parties
 Partie requérante: European Renewable Energies Federation (EREF) asbl (Bruxelles, Belgique) (représentant: D. Fouquet, avocat)
 Partie défenderesse: Commission des Communautés européennes
 Conclusions de la partie requérante
 —
 La décision K(2006) 4963 final de la Commission européenne, datée du 24 octobre 2006, est déclarée nulle et non avenue;
 —
 la société-écran en question est qualifiée d'aide d'État illicite dans sa forme et sa structure actuelles.
 —
 Subsidiairement, il est enjoint à la Commission d'ouvrir une procédure formelle d'examen conformément à l'article 88, paragraphe 2 CE pour l'affaire NN 62/B/2006.
 —
 La Commission est condamnée aux dépens.
 Moyens et principaux arguments
 En 2004, la partie requérante a déposé une plainte auprès de la Commission en faisant valoir notamment que divers aspects du financement d'une nouvelle centrale nucléaire en construction en Finlande constituaient une aide d'État qui n'avait pas été notifiée. En 2006, la Commission a scindé le dossier en deux affaires numérotées NN 62/A/2006 et NN 62/B/2006.
 Dans la présente affaire, la partie requérante demande l'annulation de la décision de la Commission C(2006) 4963 final, qui porte sur l'aide d'État NN 62/B/2006, selon laquelle la Commission a affirmé qu'une ouverture de crédit accordée par un consortium de cinq banques et un prêt accordé par AB Svensk Exportkredit (ci-après «SEK») ne constituaient pas une aide au sens de l'article 87, paragraphe 1 CE.
 La partie requérante soutient que la division du dossier par la Commission en deux affaires séparées est illégale aussi bien du point de vue procédural que du fond. Selon la partie requérante, il n'était possible d'accorder l'ouverture de crédit et le prêt à un intérêt aussi bas que grâce à la garantie d'assurance-crédit de l'agence française d'assurance-crédit COFACE. Toutefois, les éléments d'aide d'État de l'engagement de la COFACE ont été traités dans le cadre de l'affaire NN 62/A/2006. La partie requérante soutient donc que la division du dossier en deux affaires séparées en sortant ainsi l'élément de la garantie du dossier NN 62/B/2006 a amené la Commission à croire erronément que l'octroi de l'ouverture de crédit et le prêt de SEK à un taux d'intérêt aussi bas ne pouvaient pas constituer une aide d'État simplement du fait que les banques qui y participaient étaient privées, selon la Commission.
 De plus, la partie requérante soutient que même en écartant la garantie de la COFACE, l'ouverture de crédit ainsi que le prêt accordé par SEK constituent une aide d'État dès lors que:
 —
 l'ouverture de crédit a été accordée à un taux d'intérêt bas avec la participation des banques BLB et BNP Paribas à qui la partie requérante reproche d'être toutes deux des banques publiques; et
 —
 le crédit de SEK a été accordé par une banque appartenant à 100 % à l'État à un taux d'intérêt inférieur aux conditions du marché.
 Enfin, la partie requérante invoque un défaut de motivation et une erreur manifeste d'appréciation.


text:
 14.4.2014
 LV
 Eiropas Savienības Oficiālais Vēstnesis
 C 112/19
 Tiesas (sestā palāta) 2014. gada 16. janvāra rīkojums – nfon AG/Fon Wireless Ltd, Iekšējā tirgus saskaņošanas birojs (preču zīmes, paraugi un modeļi)
 (Lieta C-193/13 P) (1)
 (Apelācija - Kopienas preču zīme - Regula (EK) Nr. 40/94 - Grafiska preču zīme, kas ietver vārdisku elementu “nfon” - Kopienas grafiskas preču zīmes, kas ietver vārdisku elementu “fon”, un valsts vārdiskas preču zīmes “FON” īpašnieka iebildumi - ITSB Apelāciju padomes veikta iebildumu noraidīšana)
 2014/C 112/23
 Tiesvedības valoda – vācu
 Lietas dalībnieki
 Apelācijas sūdzības iesniedzēja: nfon AG (pārstāve – V. von Bomhard, Rechtsanwältin)
 Pārējie lietas dalībnieki: Fon Wireless Ltd (pārstāve – L. Montoya Terán, abogada) Iekšējā tirgus saskaņošanas birojs (preču zīmes, paraugi un modeļi) (pārstāvis – D. Walicka)
 Priekšmets
 Apelācijas sūdzība par Vispārējās tiesas (ceturtā palāta) 2013. gada 29. janvāra spriedumu lietā T-283/11 Fon Wireless/ITSB – Nfon (“Nfon”), ar kuru Vispārējā tiesa grozīja Iekšējā tirgus saskaņošanas biroja (preču zīmes, paraugi un modeļi) (ITSB) Apelāciju ceturtās padomes 2011. gada 18. marta lēmumu lietā R 1017/2009-4 tādējādi, ka nfon AG apelācijas sūdzība, kas iesniegta Apelāciju padomē, tiek noraidīta – Padomes 2009. gada 26. februāra Regulas (EK) Nr. 207/2009 par Kopienas preču zīmi (OV L 78, 1. lpp.) 8. panta 1. punkta b) apakšpunkta pārkāpums
 Rezolutīvā daļa:
 1)
 apelācijas sūdzību noraidīt;
 2)
 nfon AG sedz savus, kā arī atlīdzina Fon Wireless Ltd tiesāšanās izdevumus;
 3)
 Iekšējā tirgus saskaņošanas birojs (preču zīmes, paraugi un modeļi) (ITSB) savus tiesāšanās izdevumus sedz pats.
 (1) OV C 189, 29.6.2013.


text:
Diagaire Protastúnach de chuid na Gearmáine ab ea Dietrich Bonhoeffer. Saolaíodh i mBreslau ar an 4 Feabhra 1906 é, agus fuair sé bás i gcampa géibhinn Flossenbürg ar an 9 Aibreán 1945.
 Luathshaol
 Bhain sé amach dintiúirí an dochtúra le diagacht nuair nach raibh ach ceithre bliana fichead d'aois slánaithe aige. Chaith sé seal sna Stáit Aontaithe agus sa Spáinn, sula bhfuair sé oifig eaglasta.
 Na Naitsithe
 Nuair a tháinig na Naitsithe i gcumhacht sa Ghearmáin, bhí sé ón tús go tréan in aghaidh an fhrith-Ghiúdachais, agus é ag cur go misniúil i gcoinne iarrachtaí na Naitsithe a n-idé-eolaíocht féin a chur i bhfeidhm ar eaglais Phrotastúnach na Gearmáine. Sa bhliain 1938, chuaigh sé leis an gcomhcheilg in aghaidh Hitler. Bhí sé ina eagraí mór i saol na heaglaise agus é i gceannas ar sheimineár rúnda diagachta i mblianta an Naitsíochais.
 Sa bhliain 1940, choisc na Naitsithe air óráidí poiblí a thabhairt, agus go gairid ina dhiaidh sin, choisc siad air freisin scríbhneoireacht a dhéanamh. Ar an 5 Márta 1943, rinneadh príosúnach de.
 Comhcheilg agus bás
 Ghlac Bonhoeffer páirt ghníomhach i gcomhcheilg Stauffenberg ar 20 Iúil 1944 in aghaidh Hitler, cé go raibh sé ina chime cheana féin nuair a cuireadh iarracht mharaithe an deachtóra i gcrích.
 Crochadh Bonhoeffer ar 9 Aibreán 1945 i gcampa géibhinn Flossenbürg, in éineacht le Karl Sack agus agus an lucht comhcheilge eile.
 Féach freisin
 Karl Sack
 Hans von Dohnanyi
 Naisc
 Fáithe an Fichiú hAois (FÁS) le Séamus Ware. Cuntais ghonta ar laochra Críostaí a sheas ar son an chirt san aois seo caite atá ann, Dietrich Bonhoeffer san áireamh.
 an saothar Críostaí le Dietrich Bonhoeffer, ‘The cost of discipleship’
 Tagairtí
 Daoine a rugadh i 1906
 Básanna i 1945
 Daoine curtha chun báis
 Daonnúlaigh
 Diagairí na Críostaíochta
 Mairtírigh
 Naoimh Gearmánacha
 Protastúnachas
 Síochánaithe


text:
Didelphimorphia
 L-Opossum ġurdien ta' Tyleria, magħruf xjentifikament bħala Marmosa tyleriana, huwa mammiferu marsupjal, li qiegħed ikklassifikat fit-tribù Metachirini, fil-familja Didelphidae (didelfidu) u fl-ordni Didelphimorphia (didelfimorfju). Dan huwa wieħed mill-opossumi ġrieden, nattiv tal-kontinent tal-Amerika ta' isfel.
 Dieta
 L-Opossum ġurdien ta' Tyleria huwa annimal omnivoru u d-dieta prinċipali tikkonsisti minn frott, insetti u annimali vertebrati u invertebrati żgħar oħrajn.
 Distribuzzjoni
 Marmosa tyleriana huwa speċi ta' opossum ġurdien b' distribuzzjoni fil-kontinent tal-Amerika ta' isfel u jinsab mifrux fil-Venezwela u possibilment fix-Xlokk tal-Kolombja.
 Klassifikazzjoni
 Ordni Didelphimorphia
 Superfamilja Didelphoidea
 Familja Didelphidae
 Sottofamilja Didelphinae
 Tribù Metachirini
 Ġeneru Marmosa
 Sottoġeneru Murina
 Opossum ġurdien ta' Tyleria, Marmosa tyleriana
 Referenzi
 Gardner, Alfred (November 16, 2005). Wilson, D. E., and Reeder, D. M. (eds) Mammal Species of the World, 3rd edition, Johns Hopkins University Press. ISBN 0-801-88221-4
 Infonatura, sit b' informazzjoni dwar il-flora u l-fawna tal-kontinent tal-Amerika ta' isfel inklużi l-opossumi.
 Ħoloq Esterni
 New World Marsupial Specialist Group 1996.[http:/12816/www.iucnredlist.org/search/details.php//all Marmosa tyleriana] In: IUCN 2006. 2006 IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Downloaded on 19 January 2007.
 Tassonomija tal-Mammiferi.


text:
 10.11.2012
 CS
 Úřední věstník Evropské unie
 C 343/12
 Rozsudek Tribunálu ze dne 26. září 2012 — Itálie v. Komise
 (Věc T-84/09) (1)
 (EZOZF - Záruční sekce - Výdaje vyloučené z financování - Informační akce a reklamy zemědělských výrobků - Výroba olivového oleje a stolních oliv - Opožděné platby)
 2012/C 343/15
 Jednací jazyk: italština
 Účastnice řízení
 Žalobkyně: Italská republika (zástupci: L. Ventrella a G. Palmieri, avvocati dello Stato)
 Žalovaná: Evropská komise (zástupci: F. Jimeno Fernández a P. Rossi, zmocněnci)
 Předmět věci
 Návrh na zrušení rozhodnutí Komise 2008/960/ES ze dne 8. prosince 2008, které vylučuje z financování Společenství některé výdaje vynaložené členskými státy v rámci záruční sekce Evropského zemědělského orientačního a záručního fondu (EZOZF) a v rámci Evropského zemědělského záručního fondu (EZZF) (Úř. věst. L 340, s. 99) v rozsahu, v němž vylučuje některé výdaje vynaložené Itálií.
 Výrok rozsudku
 1)
 Žaloba se zamítá.
 2)
 Italské republice se ukládá náhrada nákladů řízení.
 (1) Úř. věst. C 90, 18.4.2009.


type: other

text:
Τόνωση της απασχόλησης και της επιχειρηματικότητας | Πρώτη Καθημερινή Εφημερίδα της Ηλείας, νέα από την Ηλεία
 Κυρ, 08/09/2020 - 20:04
 Τόνωση της απασχόλησης και της επιχειρηματικότητας
 Συναντήσεις με στελέχη του Εργατικού Κέντρου και το δήμαρχο Πύργου είχε ο διοικητής του ΟΑΕΔ - Αρχικά επισκέφτηκε τις υπηρεσίες του Οργανισμού στην είσοδο της πόλης
 Ιούνιος 18, 2020 05:02 ΜΜ
 Σημαντικά προβλήματα που απασχολούν τους εργαζόμενους της περιοχής, σε συνδυασμό με την άμεση ανάγκη που υπάρχει για την τόνωση της επιχειρηματικότητας, τέθηκαν στον διοικητή του ΟΑΕΔ κ. Σπ. Πρωτοψάλτη κατά την παρουσία του τόσο στο Εργατικό Κέντρο, όσο και στο δήμο Πύργου.
 Αρχικά ο κ. Πρωτοψάλτης επισκέφτηκε τις υπηρεσίες του Οργανισμού στην είσοδο της πόλης (ΚΠΑ2 και επαγγελματικές σχολές), όπου ενημερώθηκε αναλυτικά για την κατάσταση που επικρατεί σε αυτές όσον αφορά την εξυπηρέτηση των πολιτών, αλλά και τα εκπαιδευτικά προγράμματα του ΟΑΕΔ.
 Ακολούθως μετέβη στο Εργατικό Κέντρο Πύργου, όπου είχε συνάντηση με τα μέλη της διοίκησης της οργάνωσης που τον ενημέρωσαν για τα ζητήματα που απασχολούν το εργατικό δυναμικό της περιοχής.
 Ο πρόεδρος του Ε.Κ. κ. Γιάννης Βέντρας τόνισε ότι αυτό που απασχολεί ιδιαίτερα την περιοχή , πέρα από την πανδημία, είναι και οι πυρκαγιές, πλημμύρες, σεισμοί κ.α. που σημειώθηκαν κατά το παρελθόν, γεγονός που έχει αντανάκλαση και στις επιχειρήσεις που υπάρχουν στο μέρος.
 « Γι’ αυτό θα θέλαμε να υπάρξουν από την πλευρά του ΟΑΕΔ κάποια προγράμματα απασχόλησης, όχι ανεργίας, που να αφορούν και τους κλάδους που έχουν πληγεί αυτή τη στιγμή και τις επιχειρήσεις και τους εργαζόμενους που είναι άνεργοι, λόγω των επιχειρήσεων και αντιμετωπίζουν τόσο πολλά προβλήματα» υπογράμμισε ο κ. Βέντρας ο οποίος συγχρόνως του έθεσε και το σημαντικό ζήτημα με το οικόπεδο για εργατικές κατοικίες στην περιοχή της ΣΕΤΤΗΛ.
 Ακόμα ζήτησε να εξεταστούν με θετικό μάτι τα εκδρομικά προγράμματα, τα οποία οι εργαζόμενοι ζητούν συνέχεια να επανέλθουν, για να μπορούν ομαδικά να πηγαίνουν εκδρομές.
 Από την πλευρά του εξάλλου ο διοικητής του Οργανισμού εξήγησε ότι κατά τη διάρκεια των έκτακτων μέτρων λόγω της πανδημίας, ο ΟΑΕΔ δημιούργησε ένα ισχυρό κοινωνικό δίκτυ προστασίας για τους ανέργους της χώρας, μέσω της δίμηνης παράτασης όλων των επιδομάτων που έληξαν το πρώτο πεντάμηνο του έτους, καθώς και την έκτακτη οικονομική ενίσχυση των μακροχρόνια ανέργων ύψους 400 ευρώ.
 «Ο ΟΑΕΔ έχει κληρονομήσει από τον πρ. Οργανισμό Εργατικής Κατοικίας, μία σειρά από εκκρεμότητες και ημιτελή έργα τα οποία αποτελούν προτεραιότητα αλλά και υποχρέωση για τη διοίκηση για να ολοκληρωθούν. Αυτή τη στιγμή η πρώτη προτεραιότητα του Οργανισμού είναι η ολοκλήρωση των έργων εργατικών κατοικιών που έχουν δημοπρατηθεί και ξεκινήσει και δυστυχώς βρίσκονται στη μέση και υπάρχουν οικογένειες που περιμένουν να μπουν εδώ και χρόνια σε αυτά τα σπίτια. Ο Οργανισμός συγκεκριμένες δυνατότητες και μια συγκεκριμένη δυναμικότητα, δεν μπορεί να κάνει όλα τα αιτήματα που έχουν υποβληθεί άμεσα. Επίσης έχω την ευθύνη να δώσω πάντα σε προτεραιότητα σε κτίρια και κτιριακές ανάγκες, στα κτίρια που στεγάζονται μαθητές, όπως οι βρεφονηπιακοί σταθμοί, οι επαγγελματικές σχολές και τα ΙΕΚ κ.α.» είπε χαρακτηριστικά ο κ. Πρωτοψάλτης.
 Ακόμα επεσήμανε πως «δίνουμε μεγάλη προτεραιότητα στην επαγγελματική εκπαίδευση και κατάρτιση, η οποία έχει μεγάλες δυνατότητες αλλά χρειαζόμαστε και εμείς να κάνουμε αναβάθμιση των ειδικοτήτων μας. Πιστεύω ότι το Ε.Κ. μπορεί να παίξει ένα πολύ σημαντικό ρόλο στα να μεταφέρει στον ΟΑΕΔ τις ανάγκες που εσείς ξέρετε ότι υπάρχουν στην περιοχή».
 «Παρών» στη συνάντηση ήταν τα στελέχη του Ε.Κ. Πύργου Κ.Κ. Χρύσα Ζούπη, Νικ. Ορφανός, Παν. Σταθάς κ.α.
 Στο δήμο Πύργου
 Αμέσως μετά εξάλλου ο διοικητής του ΟΑΕΔ πήγε στο δημαρχείο Πύργου, όπου είχε συνάντηση με το δήμαρχο κ. Τάκη Αντωνακόπουλο, με τον οποίο συζήτησε για θέματα που είναι αρμοδιότητας του Οργανισμού και βρίσκονται σε άμεση συνάρτηση με την περιοχή.
 Μιλώντας ο δήμαρχος Πύργου, κατά την υποδοχή του κ. Πρωτοψάλτη ανέφερε τα εξής:
 «Είναι κατεξοχήν περιοχή που έχουμε τουριστική δραστηριότητα, η κρουαζιέρα δεν πάει καλά και μόνο για την ακύρωση 110 πλοίων του Ιουνίου έχουμε 6 εκατ. ευρώ απώλεια κύκλου εργασιών. Με τις πιο χαμηλές εκτιμήσεις. Ρεαλιστικά να δούμε τα προγράμματα που έχετε εσείς, πως θα τεθούν σε αποδοτική διαδικασία και να μην είναι προγράμματα μιας άλλης αντίληψης, επιδότησης της ανεργίας. Εμείς περιμένουμε την κοινωφελή εργασία, αξιοποιούμε και κάποια άλλα ειδικά προγράμματα ειδικά γι’ αυτούς που βρίσκονται κοντά στη συνταξιοδότηση. Μας ενδιαφέρει ειδικά στις τεχνικές ειδικότητες, χειριστές μηχανημάτων κλπ. και υπάρχει δουλειά που μπορεί να καλυφθεί με αυτούς τους ανθρώπους. Νομίζω ότι ο ΟΑΕΔ έπρεπε να είναι ολόκληρο υπουργείο στα χρόνια της κρίσης για τη διαχείριση της ανεργίας. Πρέπει να στηρίξετε από τη μια πλευρά θέσεις εργασίας και από την άλλη την επιχειρηματικότητα. Δυστυχώς σε εμάς η τουριστική επιχειρηματικότητα δεν είναι σε ανθρώπους που είναι γνώστες του αντικειμένου. Έχουμε προγράμματα που μπορεί να μας βοηθήσετε, μπορεί να κάνουμε και ένα μνημόνιο συνεργασίας, έχετε και κάποια ακίνητα που μπορεί να τα βοηθήσουμε και να πάρουν την αξία τους όπως λ.χ. στη ΣΕΤΤΗΛ που είναι ακαθάριστη έκταση».
 Από την πλευρά του εξάλλου ο διοικητής του ΟΑΕΔ δήλωσε:
 «Ο ΟΑΕΔ έχει πολλά εργαλεία. Όλοι γνωρίζουν το επίδομα ανεργίας και το κοινωνικό δίκτυ προστασίας που πάντα δημιουργεί σε αυτές τις δύσκολες συγκυρίες και στηρίζει το εργατικό δυναμικό. Έχουμε 100.000 θέσεις εργασίας τις οποίες έχουμε σχεδιάσει μέχρι το τέλος του έτους, καθώς επίσης και τον κοινωνικό τουρισμό που ανακοινώθηκε και που θα βοηθήσει στην ενίσχυση της εσωτερικής ζήτησης για τουρισμό αυτή τη σεζόν και έχουμε επίσης ειδικά προγράμματα που θα στηρίξουν τους εποχιακούς εργαζόμενους που δεν θα επαναπροσληφθούν. Ο ΟΑΕΔ είναι εδώ για να έλθει πιο κοντά στις τοπικές κοινωνίες, θέλουμε να έχουμε να έχουμε πιο στενή συνεργασία με την Τ.Α. γιατί οι ανάγκες της κάθε περιοχής είναι διαφορετικές».
 Στις συναντήσεις συμμετείχε και η περιφερειακή διευθύντρια ΟΑΕΔ στην Πάτρα κ. Αγγελική Καλαπόδη.


text:
Az Őrzöm a lángot a Bikini huszadik nagylemeze. A szövegek írásába Bródy János is besegített. Ezen az albumon szerepelt először Lukács Péter az együttes gitárosaként.
 Közreműködtek
 Bikini együttes:
 D. Nagy Lajos - ének, vokál
 Lukács Péter - gitár ,Hammond orgona ,vokál
 Németh Alajos - basszusgitár , szintetizátor, programok
 Bördén Szabolcs - billentyűs hangszerek
 Mihalik Viktor - dob
 Makovics Dénes - szaxofon
 Pacziga Linda - vokál
 Frankie Látó - hegedű
 Számok listája
 Őrzöm a lángot
 Ki kell jutnom
 A mennyország felé
 Mennem kell
 Körhinta
 Rossz idők
 Minden úgy történt
 Ami a szívemen
 Szabadíts meg
 Tűzvigyázó
 Magányos nap
 Lányok térnek meg
 Források
 Bikini: Őrzöm a lángot (2007, CD) Discogs
 Őrzöm a lángot bikininet.hu
 2007 nagylemezei
 Bikini-albumok


text:
 19.12.2009
 RO
 Jurnalul Oficial al Uniunii Europene
 C 312/33
 Acțiune introdusă la 8 octombrie 2009 — ancotel/OAPI — Acotel (ancotel)
 (Cauza T-408/09)
 2009/C 312/55
 Limba în care a fost formulată acțiunea: germana
 Părțile
 Reclamantă: ancotel GmbH (Frankfurt am Main, Germania) (reprezentant: Rechtsanwalt H. Truelsen)
 Pârât: Oficiul pentru Armonizare în cadrul Pieței Interne (mărci, desene și modele industriale)
 Cealaltă parte în procedura care s-a aflat pe rolul camerei de recurs: Acotel SpA (Roma, Italia)
 Concluziile reclamantei
 —
 anularea Deciziei Primei camere de recurs a Oficiului pentru Armonizare în cadrul Pieței Interne (OAPI) din 19 iunie 2009 (cauza R 1385/2008-1);
 —
 obligarea OAPI la plata cheltuielilor de judecată.
 Motivele și principalele argumente
 Solicitantul mărcii comunitare: ancotel
 Marca comunitară vizată: marca figurativă „ancotel” pentru sercivii din clasele 35 și 38 (cerere de înregistrare nr. 3 314 424)
 Titularul mărcii sau al semnului invocat în sprijinul opoziției: Acotel SpA
 Marca sau semnul invocat în sprijinul opoziției: în special marca figurativă italiană nr. 643 751 și marca figurativă comunitară „ACOTEL” pentru produse și servicii din clasele 9 și 38
 Decizia diviziei de opoziție: admite în parte a opoziția
 Decizia camerei de recurs: respinge recursul
 Motivele invocate: încălcarea articolului 8 alineatul 1 litera (b) din Regulamentul (CE) nr. 207/2009 (1) având în vedere lipsa riscului de confuzie între mărcile respective
 (1) Regulamentul (CE) nr. 207/2009 al Consiliului din 26 februarie 2009 cu privire la marca comunitară (JO 2009, L 78, p. 1).


text:
 12.1.2015
 SL
 Uradni list Evropske unije
 C 7/2
 Sodba Sodišča (prvi senat) z dne 5. novembra 2014 (predlog za sprejetje predhodne odločbe Oberster Gerichtshof – Avstrija) – Österreichischer Gewerkschaftsbund/Verband Österreichischer Banken und Bankiers
 (Zadeva C-476/12) (1)
 ((Predhodno odločanje - Socialna politika - Okvirni sporazum o delu s krajšim delovnim časom - Načelo prepovedi diskriminacije - Kolektivna pogodba, ki določa dodatek za vzdrževanega otroka - Dodatek, ki se zaposlenim s krajšim delovnim časom izplačuje v skladu z načelom pro rata temporis))
 (2015/C 007/02)
 Jezik postopka: nemščina
 Predložitveno sodišče
 Oberster Gerichtshof
 Stranki v postopku v glavni stvari
 Tožeča stranka: Österreichischer Gewerkschaftsbund
 Tožena stranka: Verband Österreichischer Banken und Bankiers
 Izrek
 Določbo 4.2 okvirnega sporazuma o delu s krajšim delovnim časom, ki je bil sklenjen 6. junija 1997, iz Priloge k Direktivi Sveta 97/81/ES z dne 15. decembra 1997 o okvirnem sporazumu o delu s krajšim delovnim časom, sklenjenim med UNICE, CEEP in ETUC, kakor je bila spremenjena z Direktivo Sveta 98/23/ES z dne 7. aprila 1998, je treba razlagati tako, da se načelo pro rata temporis uporablja pri izračunu dodatka za vzdrževanega otroka, ki ga delodajalec delavca, zaposlenega s krajšim delovnim časom, izplačuje na podlagi kolektivne pogodbe, kot je ta, ki se uporablja za zaposlene v avstrijskih bankah in bankirje.
 (1) UL C 32, 2.2.2013.


text:
13.12.2007
 LT
 Europos Sąjungos oficialusis leidinys
 L 328/10
 EEE JUNGTINIO KOMITETO SPRENDIMAS
 Nr. 75/2007
 2007 m. liepos 6 d.
 iš dalies keičiantis EEE susitarimo I priedą (Veterinarijos ir fitosanitarijos klausimai)
 EEE JUNGTINIS KOMITETAS,
 atsižvelgdamas į Europos ekonominės erdvės susitarimą su pakeitimais, padarytais Protokolu, patikslinančiu Europos ekonominės erdvės susitarimą (toliau – Susitarimas), ypač į jo 98 straipsnį,
 kadangi:
 (1)
 Susitarimo I priedas iš dalies pakeistas 2006 m. gruodžio 8 d. EEE jungtinio komiteto sprendimu Nr. 143/2006 (1).
 (2)
 Į Susitarimą turi būti įtrauktas 2006 m. gegužės 8 d. Komisijos sprendimas 2006/335/EB, leidžiantis Lenkijos Respublikai uždrausti jos teritorijoje naudoti šešiolika genetiškai modifikuotų kukurūzų veislių, išvestų iš genetiškai modifikuoto organizmo MON 810, įrašyto bendrajame žemės ūkio augalų veislių kataloge, pagal Direktyvą 2002/53/EB (2).
 (3)
 Į Susitarimą turi būti įtrauktas 2006 m. gegužės 8 d. Komisijos sprendimas 2006/338/EB, leidžiantis Lenkijos Respublikai savo teritorijoje uždrausti naudoti kai kurias kukurūzų veisles, išvardytas bendrajame žemės ūkio augalų veislių kataloge, pagal Tarybos direktyvą 2002/53/EB (3).
 (4)
 Į Susitarimą turi būti įtraukta 2006 m. gruodžio 5 d. Komisijos direktyva 2006/124/EB, iš dalies keičianti Tarybos direktyvą 92/33/EEB dėl prekybos daržovių dauginamąja ir sodinamąja medžiaga, išskyrus sėklą, ir Tarybos direktyvą 2002/55/EB dėl prekybos daržovių sėkla (4).
 (5)
 Į Susitarimą turi būti įtraukta 2006 m. gruodžio 7 d. Komisijos direktyva 2006/127/EB, iš dalies keičianti Direktyvą 2003/91/EB, nustatančią Tarybos direktyvos 2002/55/EB 7 straipsnio įgyvendinimo priemones, susijusias su minimaliomis tikrinimo charakteristikomis ir minimaliomis daržovių rūšių tam tikrų veislių tikrinimo sąlygomis (5).
 (6)
 Į Susitarimą turi būti įtrauktas 2006 m. gruodžio 14 d. Komisijos sprendimas 2006/934/EB dėl 2005 m. pagal Tarybos direktyvą 2002/55/EB Bendrijoje pradėtų sėklų ir Asparagus officinalis L. dauginamosios medžiagos lyginamųjų bandymų ir tyrimų tęsimo 2007 m. (6)
 (7)
 Į Susitarimą turi būti įtrauktas 2006 m. gruodžio 18 d. Komisijos sprendimas 2007/66/EB dėl laikino eksperimento dėl didžiausio tam tikrų pašarinių augalų sėklų partijos svorio padidinimo pagal Tarybos direktyvą 66/401/EEB (7),
 NUSPRENDĖ:
 1 straipsnis
 Susitarimo I priedo III skyrius iš dalies keičiamas taip:
 1.
 1 dalyje 12 punktas (Tarybos direktyva 2002/55/EB) papildomas šia įtrauka:
 „—
 32006 L 0124: 2006 m. gruodžio 5 d. Komisijos direktyva 2006/124/EB (OL L 339, 2006 12 6, p. 12).“
 2.
 1 dalyje 15 punktas (Komisijos direktyva 2003/91/EB) papildomas taip:
 „su pakeitimais, padarytais:
 —
 32006 L 0127: 2006 m. gruodžio 7 d. Komisijos direktyva 2006/127/EB (OL L 343, 2006 12 8, p. 82).“
 3.
 2 dalyje po 46 punkto (Komisijos direktyva 2006/47/EB) įterpiami šie punktai:
 „47.
 32006 D 0335: 2006 m. gegužės 8 d. Komisijos sprendimas 2006/335/EB, leidžiantis Lenkijos Respublikai uždrausti jos teritorijoje naudoti šešiolika genetiškai modifikuotų kukurūzų veislių, išvestų iš genetiškai modifikuoto organizmo MON 810, įrašyto bendrajame žemės ūkio augalų veislių kataloge, pagal Direktyvą 2002/53/EB (OL L 124, 2006 5 11, p. 26).
 48.
 32006 D 0338: 2006 m. gegužės 8 d. Komisijos sprendimas 2006/338/EB, leidžiantis Lenkijos Respublikai savo teritorijoje uždrausti naudoti kai kurias kukurūzų veisles, išvardytas bendrajame žemės ūkio augalų veislių kataloge, pagal Tarybos direktyvą 2002/53/EB (OL L 125, 2006 5 12, p. 31).
 49.
 32006 D 0934: 2006 m. gruodžio 14 d. Komisijos sprendimas 2006/934/EB dėl 2005 m. pagal Tarybos direktyvą 2002/55/EB Bendrijoje pradėtų sėklų ir Asparagus officinalis L. dauginamosios medžiagos lyginamųjų bandymų ir tyrimų tęsimo 2007 m. (OL L 355, 2006 12 15, p. 104).
 50.
 32007 D 0066: 2006 m. gruodžio 18 d. Komisijos sprendimas 2007/66/EB dėl laikino eksperimento dėl didžiausio tam tikrų pašarinių augalų sėklų partijos svorio padidinimo pagal Tarybos direktyvą 66/401/EEB (OL L 32, 2007 2 6, p. 161).“
 2 straipsnis
 Direktyvų 2006/124/EB bei 2006/127/EB ir Sprendimų 2006/335/EB, 2006/338/EB, 2006/934/EB ir 2007/66/EB tekstai islandų ir norvegų kalbomis, kurie turi būti paskelbti Europos Sąjungos oficialiojo leidinio EEE priede, yra autentiški.
 3 straipsnis
 Šis sprendimas įsigalioja 2007 m. liepos 7 d., jei EEE jungtiniam komitetui buvo pateikti visi pranešimai pagal Susitarimo 103 straipsnio 1 dalį (8).
 4 straipsnis
 Šis sprendimas skelbiamas Europos Sąjungos oficialiojo leidinio EEE skyriuje ir EEE priede.
 Priimta Briuselyje 2007 m. liepos 6 d.
 EEE jungtinio komiteto vardu
 Pirmininkas
 Stefán Haukur JÓHANNESSON
 (1) OL L 89, 2007 3 29, p. 9.
 (2) OL L 124, 2006 5 11, p. 26.
 (3) OL L 125, 2006 5 12, p. 31.
 (4) OL L 339, 2006 12 6, p. 12.
 (5) OL L 343, 2006 12 8, p. 82.
 (6) OL L 355, 2006 12 15, p. 104.
 (7) OL L 32, 2007 2 6, p. 161.
 (8) Konstituciniai reikalavimai nenurodyti.


text:
Janne Mikael Vainio (9. maaliskuuta 1966 – 25. huhtikuuta 2021) oli suomalainen filosofian maisteri ja filosofian jatko-opiskelija. Hän toimi Vapaa ajattelija -lehden päätoimittajana ja Vapaa-ajattelijain liiton järjestösihteerinä.
 Tiedon ja etiikan välisissä suhteissa Vainio korosti Humen giljotiinin keskeistä merkitystä avoimen yhteiskunnan edellyttämän järkiperäisen keskustelun perustana. Hän kehitti eräitä filosofisia uudissanoja, kuten uskontofilosofisen tiedonto-käsitteen.
 Lähteet
 Aiheesta muualla
 Janne Vainion kirjoituksia.
 Vainio, Janne: Tarvitaanko vapautuksen buddhologiaa? Toimenpide 1998.
 Suomalaiset ateistit
 Suomalaiset uskontokriitikot
 Vuonna 1966 syntyneet
 Vuonna 2021 kuolleet


text:
 7.9.2013
 MT
 Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali tal-Unjoni Ewropea
 C 260/39
 Appell ippreżentat fid-19 ta’ Lulju 2013 mill-Uffiċċju għall-Armonizzazzjoni fis-Suq Intern (Trade marks u Disinni) mis-sentenza mogħtija mill-Qorti Ġenerali (L-Ewwel Awla) fl-14 ta’ Mejju 2013 fil-Kawża T-249/11, Sanco vs UASI — Marsalman (rappreżentazzjoni ta’ tiġieġa)
 (Kawża C-411/13 P)
 2013/C 260/70
 Lingwa tal-kawża: l-Ispanjol
 Partijiet
 Appellanti: L-Uffiċċju għall-Armonizzazzjoni fis-Suq Intern (Trade marks u Disinni) (rappreżentanti: J. Crespo Carrillo u A. Folliard-Monguiral, bħala aġenti)
 Parti oħra fil-proċedura: Sanco, SA
 Talbiet tal-appellanti
 —
 tannulla s-sentenza appellata;
 —
 tagħti sentenza ġdida fuq il-mertu tal-kawża billi tiċħad ir-rikors ippreżentat kontra d-deċiżjoni kkontestata, jew tibgħat lura l-kawża lill-Qorti Ġenerali;
 —
 tikkundanna lir-rikorrenti quddiem il-Qorti Ġenerali għall-ispejjeż.
 Aggravji u argumenti prinċipali
 (1)
 Il-Qorti Ġenerali kisret l-Artikolu 8(1)(b) tar-Regolament dwar it-trade mark Komunitarja (1) billi bbażat ruħha fuq interpretazzjoni żbaljata tal-portata tas-servizzi koperti mit-trade mark li għaliha saret l-applikazzjoni fil-klassijiet 35 u 39 tal-Klassifikazzjoni ta’ Nice. L-analiżi tax-xebh tal-prodotti u servizzi hija żbaljata, peress illi l-Qorti Ġenerali ma ħaditx inkunsiderazzjoni l-fatt li s-servizzi koperti mit-trade mark li għaliha saret l-applikazzjoni jeskludu mill-kamp ta’ applikazzjoni tagħom l-attivitajiet li operatur joffri f’ismu stess fir-rigward tal-prodotti tiegħu. Il-kwistjoni jekk tali servizzi għandhomx, fis-sens tal-Klassifikazzjoni ta’ Nice, jiġu pprovduti f’isem terzi, huwa punt ta’ liġi li għandu jiġi kkjarifikat mill-Qorti tal-Ġustizzja.
 (2)
 Il-Qorti Ġenerali kisret l-Artikolu 8(1)(b) tar-Regolament dwar it-trade mark billi eżaminat il-kumplimentarjetà tal-prodotti jew servizzi skont l-importanza li għandu prodott jew servizz “għax-xiri” ta’ prodotti jew servizzi oħra, skont il-perċezzjoni tal-pubbliku relevanti. Il-Qorti Ġenerali naqset milli teżamina jekk il-kumplimentarjetà tal-prodotti u servizzi hijiex ibbażata fuq interazzjoni tali li l-użu konġunt tagħhom jirriżulta, minn perspettiva strettament oġġettiva, neċessarju jew mixtieq.
 (3)
 Il-Qorti Ġenerali kisret l-Artikolu 8(1)(b) tar-Regolament dwar it-trade mark Komunitarja billi kkonkludiet li ċerti prodotti jew servizzi kumplimentari kienu awtomatikament jixxiebhu, anki jekk fuq livell minimu, mingħajr ma vverifikat jekk id-differenzi li jirriżultaw minn fatturi oħra kinux suxxettibbli li jinnewtralizzaw din il-kumplimentarjetà.
 (1) Regolament tal-Kunsill (KE) Nru 207/2009, tas-26 ta’ Frar 2009, dwar it-trade mark Komunitarja (ĠU L 78, p. 1).


text:
3. siječnja (3.1.) 3. je dan godine po gregorijanskom kalendaru.
 Do kraja godine ima još 362 dana (363 u prijestupnoj godini).
 Događaji
 1496. – Leonardo da Vinci iskušava bez uspjeha model letjelice.
 1521. – Papa Lav X. ekskomunicirao Martina Luthera papinskom bulom "Decet Romanu Pontefici".
 1921. – Turski mir s Armenijom.
 1924. – Pronađen sarkofag faraona Tutankamona.
 1944. – Saveznici bombardirali Split.
 1957. – Predstavljen prvi električni sat.
 1961. – SAD prekinule diplomatske odnose s Kubom.
 1962. – Papa Ivan XXIII. ekskomunicirao je Fidela Castra u svojem nastojanju da posreduje između Nikite Hruščova i J. F. Kennedyja u vrijeme Kubanske krize.
 1980. – Josip Broz Tito primljen je u ljubljanski klinički centar u kojem će i umrijeti.
 1993. – Rusija i SAD potpisale START 2, sporazum o smanjenju nuklearnog naoružanja.
 1999. – Lansiran "Mars Polar Lander".
 2004. – Egipatski "Boeing 737", tvrtke Flash Airlines, srušio se u Crveno more. Poginulo je svih 148 putnika i članova posade, među njima 135 Francuza.
 2020. – U američkom napadu ubijen brigadni general Qasem Soleimani, zapovjednik iranskih Quds specijalnih snaga
 Blagdani i spomendani
 Dan Presvetog Imena Isusovog (katoličanstvo)
 Imendani
 Genoveva
 Cvijeta
 Izvori
 003


text:
 Svarbus teisinis pranešimas
 |
 52008PC0182(01)
 Pasiūlymas Tarybos sprendimas dėl Europos Bendrijų bei jų valstybių narių ir Bosnijos ir Hercegovinos stabilizacijos ir asociacijos susitarimo pasirašymo Europos bendrijos vardu /* KOM/2008/0182 galutinis */
 [pic] | EUROPOS BENDRIJŲ KOMISIJA |Briuselis, 8.4.2008KOM(2008)182 galutinis2008/0073 (AVC)PasiūlymasTARYBOS SPRENDIMASdėl Europos Bendrijų bei jų valstybių narių ir Bosnijos ir Hercegovinos stabilizacijos ir asociacijos susitarimo pasirašymo Europos bendrijos varduPasiūlymasTARYBOS IR KOMISIJOS SPRENDIMASdėl Europos Bendrijų bei jų valstybių narių ir Bosnijos ir Hercegovinos stabilizacijos ir asociacijos susitarimo sudarymo(pateiktos Komisijos)AIŠKINAMASIS MEMORANDUMAS1. Du pridedami pasiūlymai yra teisiniai dokumentai, kurių pagrindu galima pasirašyti ir sudaryti Europos Bendrijų bei jų valstybių narių ir Bosnijos ir Hercegovinos stabilizacijos ir asociacijos susitarimą (toliau – SAS): i) Tarybos sprendimo pasiūlymas dėl Susitarimo pasirašymo; ii) Tarybos ir Komisijos sprendimo pasiūlymas dėl Susitarimo sudarymo.2. 2005 m. lapkričio 21 d. Taryba nusprendė įgalioti Komisiją derėtis dėl SAS su Bosnija ir Hercegovina ir derybos dėl SAS buvo oficialiai pradėtos 2005 m. lapkričio 25 d. Derybos vyko daug konsultuojantis su COWEB ir ES valstybėmis narėmis. Techninės diskusijos buvo užbaigtos 2006 m. gruodžio mėn. Pasikonsultavus su valstybėmis narėmis buvo atlikti papildomi koregavimai, o galutinis SAS tekstas buvo parengtas 2007 m. gegužės mėn.3. Geresnis Bosnijos ir Hercegovinos bendradarbiavimas su TBTBJ ir 2007 m. paskutinį ketvirtį padaryta pažanga įgyvendinant policijos reformą leido Komisijai 2007 m. gruodžio 4 d. Sarajeve parafuoti Stabilizacijos ir asociacijos susitarimą.4. Galutinis sprendimas pasirašyti Stabilizacijos ir asociacijos susitarimą priklauso nuo bendros peržiūros, numatytos 2005 m. lapkričio 21 d. Tarybos išvadose ir prie jų pridedamoje bendrojoje Tarybos ir Komisijos deklaracijoje[1] dėl policijos reformos, bendradarbiavimo su TBTBJ, teisinės sistemos bei administracinių gebėjimų plėtojimo ir visuomeninio transliuotojo teisės aktų. Šiame pasiūlyme nepriimamas išankstinis sprendimas dėl vertinimo, ar Bosnija ir Hercegovina laikosi savo įsipareigojimų šiuo klausimu.2005 m. lapkričio mėn. priimdamos derybų direktyvas Komisija ir Taryba kartu paskelbė, kad prieš pabaigiant derybas dėl SAS:- Komisija praneš Tarybai apie politines sąlygas ir- Taryba ir Komisija kartu peržiūrės Bosnijos ir Hercegovinos padarytą pažangą.Todėl Komisija tinkamu laiku ir laikydamasi Bendrosios deklaracijos parengs ataskaitą Tarybai ir ji kartu su Taryba peržiūrės pažangą prieš priimant galutinį sprendimą dėl SAS su Bosnija ir Hercegovina pasirašymo.5. Stabilizacijos ir asociacijos susitarime pagrindinis dėmesys skiriamas šiems svarbiausiems elementams:6. politiniam dialogui su Bosnija ir Hercegovina,7. nuostatoms dėl glaudesnio regioninio bendradarbiavimo, taip pat dėl laisvosios prekybos zonų tarp regiono šalių,8. laisvosios prekybos zonos steigimo galimybei tarp Bendrijos bei Bosnijos ir Hercegovinos per penkerius metus nuo Susitarimo įsigaliojimo,9. nuostatoms dėl darbuotojų judėjimo, steigimosi laisvės, paslaugų teikimo, einamųjų mokėjimų ir kapitalo judėjimo,10. Bosnijos ir Hercegovinos įsipareigojimui suderinti savo teisės aktus su EB teisės aktais, visų pirma svarbiausiose vidaus rinkos srityse,11. nuostatoms dėl bendradarbiavimo su Bosnija ir Hercegovina įvairiose srityse, įskaitant teisingumo, laisvės ir saugumo sritis,12. Stabilizacijos ir asociacijos tarybos, kuri kontroliuotų, kaip įgyvendinamas Susitarimas, Stabilizacijos ir asociacijos komiteto bei Stabilizacijos ir asociacijos parlamentinio komiteto steigimo nuostatai.6. Kartu su Stabilizacijos ir asociacijos susitarimu bus toliau taikomos prekybos nuolaidos, kurios buvo suteiktos 2000 m. rugsėjo 18 d. Tarybos reglamentu (EB) Nr. 2007/2000, įvedančiu išskirtines prekybos priemones, skirtas Europos Sąjungos stabilizavimo ir asocijavimo procese dalyvaujančioms arba su juo susijusioms šalims ir teritorijoms, iš dalies keičiančiu Reglamentą (EB) Nr. 2820/98 ir panaikinančiu reglamentus (EB) Nr. 1763/1999 ir (EB) Nr. 6/2000[2].7. Komisija prašo Tarybos galutinai patvirtinti SAS tekstą ir pradėti šio Susitarimo pasirašymo ir sudarymo procedūras, remiantis dviem pridedamais pasiūlymais.8. Taikomos skirtingos Susitarimo pasirašymo ir sudarymo procedūros dviem Europos bendrijoms (Europos bendrijai ir Europos atominės energijos bendrijai):a) EB sutarties 300 straipsnio 2 dalies pirmo sakinio pirmoje įtraukoje numatomas atskiras Tarybos sprendimas dėl Susitarimo pasirašymo Europos bendrijos vardu; EAEB sutartyje joks panašus reikalavimas nenumatytas;b) dėl Susitarimo sudarymo:- Taryba, gavusi Europos Parlamento pritarimą pagal Sutarties 310 straipsnį, sudaro Susitarimą Europos bendrijos vardu;- Europos atominės energijos bendrijos vardu Taryba patvirtina susitarimą pagal EAEB sutarties 101 straipsnio antrą dalį; po to susitarimą sudaro Komisija;9. Remdamasi tuo, kas išdėstyta pirmiau, Tarybai ir Komisijai priėmus teigiamą bendrą sprendimą dėl politinių sąlygų peržiūros, kaip numatyta 4 dalyje, Komisija prašo Tarybos priimti sprendimą:i) dėl Susitarimo pasirašymo Europos bendrijos vardu,ii) dėl Susitarimo sudarymo Europos bendrijos vardu ir pritarti tam, kad jį sudarytų Euratomas.Kad Susitarimas įsigaliotų, būtina, kad jį ratifikuotų visos valstybės narės.PasiūlymasTARYBOS SPRENDIMASdėl Europos Bendrijų bei jų valstybių narių ir Bosnijos ir Hercegovinos stabilizacijos ir asociacijos susitarimo pasirašymo Europos bendrijos varduEUROPOS SĄJUNGOS TARYBA,atsižvelgdama į Europos bendrijos steigimo sutartį, ypač į jos 310 straipsnį kartu su 300 straipsnio 2 dalies pirmos pastraipos pirmu sakiniu,atsižvelgdama į Komisijos pasiūlymą[3],kadangi:13. Derybos su Bosnija ir Hercegovina dėl Europos Bendrijų bei jų valstybių narių ir Bosnijos ir Hercegovinos stabilizacijos ir asociacijos susitarimo buvo užbaigtos.14. Šiame susitarime esančios komercinės nuostatos yra išskirtinio pobūdžio, jos susijusios su politika, vykdoma stabilizacijos ir asociacijos procese, ir jos nesudarys Europos Sąjungai jokio precedento Bendrijos prekybos politikoje trečiųjų šalių, kurios nėra Vakarų Balkanų šalys, atžvilgiu.15. 2007 m. gruodžio 4 d. Sarajeve parafuotas susitarimas turėtų būti pasirašytas Europos bendrijos vardu su sąlyga, kad jis bus sudarytas vėliau,NUSPRENDĖ:Vienintelis straipsnisTarybos pirmininkas įgaliojamas paskirti asmenis, įgaliotus pasirašyti Europos Bendrijų bei jos valstybių narių ir Bosnijos ir Hercegovinos stabilizacijos ir asociacijos susitarimą Europos bendrijos vardu su sąlyga, kad jis bus sudarytas vėliau.PriimtaTarybos varduPirmininkas2008/0073 (AVC)PasiūlymasTARYBOS IR KOMISIJOS SPRENDIMASdėl Europos Bendrijų bei jų valstybių narių ir Bosnijos ir Hercegovinos stabilizacijos ir asociacijos susitarimo sudarymoEUROPOS SĄJUNGOS TARYBA, EUROPOS BENDRIJŲ KOMISIJA,atsižvelgdamos į Europos bendrijos steigimo sutartį, ypač į jos 310 straipsnį kartu su 300 straipsnio 2 dalies pirmos pastraipos paskutiniu sakiniu ir 300 straipsnio 3 dalies antra pastraipa,atsižvelgdamos į Europos atominės energijos bendrijos steigimo sutartį, ypač į jos 101 straipsnio antrą dalį,atsižvelgdamos į Komisijos pasiūlymą,atsižvelgdamos į Europos Parlamento pritarimą[4],atsižvelgdamos į Tarybos pritarimą pagal Europos atominės energijos bendrijos steigimo sutarties 101 straipsnį,kadangi:(1) Europos Bendrijų bei jų valstybių narių ir Bosnijos ir Hercegovinos stabilizacijos ir asociacijos susitarimas buvo pasirašytas Europos bendrijos vardu [...] [...] su sąlyga, kad jis bus sudarytas vėliau, pagal [...] Tarybos sprendimą (EB) Nr. [...]/[...][5].(2) Šiame Susitarime esančios komercinės nuostatos yra išskirtinio pobūdžio, jos susijusios su politika, vykdoma stabilizacijos ir asociacijos procese, ir jos nesudarys Europos Sąjungai jokio precedento Bendrijos prekybos politikoje trečiųjų šalių, kurios nėra Vakarų Balkanų šalys, atžvilgiu.(3) Šis Susitarimas turėtų būti patvirtintas,NUSPRENDĖ:1 straipsnisEuropos Bendrijų bei jų valstybių narių ir Bosnijos ir Hercegovinos stabilizacijos ir asociacijos susitarimas, jo priedai bei protokolai, taip pat prie baigiamojo akto pridėtos bendros deklaracijos ir Bendrijos deklaracija, patvirtinami Europos bendrijos ir Europos atominės energijos bendrijos vardu.Pirmoje dalyje nurodyti tekstai pridedami prie šio sprendimo.2 straipsnis1. Bendrijos poziciją Stabilizacijos ir asociacijos taryboje bei Stabilizacijos ir asociacijos komitete, kai pastarasis yra Stabilizacijos ir asociacijos tarybos įgaliojamas veikti, nustato Taryba, remdamasi Komisijos pasiūlymu, arba, kai taikytina, Komisija, kiekviena pagal atitinkamas Sutarčių nuostatas.2. Stabilizacijos ir asociacijos tarybai pagal Stabilizacijos ir asociacijos susitarimo 117 straipsnį pirmininkauja Tarybos Pirmininkas. Stabilizacijos ir asociacijos komitetui pagal jo darbo tvarkos taisykles pirmininkauja Komisijos atstovas.3. Sprendimą skelbti Stabilizacijos ir asociacijos tarybos ir Stabilizacijos ir asociacijos komiteto sprendimus Europos Sąjungos oficialiajame leidinyje kiekvienu atveju atskirai priima atitinkamai Taryba ir Komisija.3 straipsnisTarybos Pirmininkas įgaliojamas paskirti asmenis, įgaliotus Europos bendrijos vardu deponuoti Susitarimo 135 straipsnyje numatytą patvirtinimą. Komisijos Pirmininkas deponuoja minėtą patvirtinimą Europos atominės energijos bendrijos vardu.PriimtaTarybos vardu Komisijos varduPirmininkas Pirmininkas [1] 14364/05 riboto naudojimo.[2] OL L 240, 2000 9 23, p. 1. Reglamentas su paskutiniais pakeitimais, padarytais Reglamentu (EB) Nr. 1946/2005 (OL L 312, 2005 11 29, p. 1).[3] OL C[...], [...], p. [...].[4] OL C[...], [...], p. [...].[5] OL C[...], [...], p. [...].


jurisdiction: US

text:
 IV
 111th CONGRESS
 2d Session
 H. RES. 1278
 In the House of Representatives, U. S.,
 May 5, 2010
 RESOLUTION
 In support and recognition of National Safe Digging Month, April, 2010.
 Whereas each year there are over 200,000 incidences of unintentional damage to underground utility infrastructure (including pipelines, electrical, telecommunications, water, and sewer lines), many as a result of an individual who fails to have underground utilities lines located before digging;
 Whereas there are 2,534,000 miles of pipelines, of which 2,036,800 are for distribution of natural gas, 323,600 for transmission of natural gas, and 173,500 for hazardous materials including oil;
 Whereas some utility lines are buried only a few inches underground, making them easy to strike even during shallow digging projects;
 Whereas failure to locate underground utility lines before digging may have unintended consequences such as service interruption, environmental damage, property damage, personal injury, and even death;
 Whereas State one-call notification programs allow homeowners and excavators to have underground utilities located and marked before conducting digging or excavation activities;
 Whereas Congress first established minimum standards for State one-call notification programs and authorized appropriations for Federal grants to improve State one-call notification programs in the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century in 1998;
 Whereas Congress required a 3-digit, nationwide toll-free number be established to be used by State one-call systems in the Pipeline Safety Improvement Act of 2002;
 Whereas in 2005, 811 was designated as the nationwide one-call number for homeowners and excavators to call before conducting digging or excavation activities;
 Whereas in the Pipeline Inspection, Protection, Enforcement, and Safety Act of 2006 Congress authorized the Secretary of Transportation to issue civil penalties to any owner or operator of a pipeline facility who fails to respond to a request to mark an underground pipeline facility, any individual who fails to use a State’s one-call system prior to digging or excavation activities, or any individual who disregards location information or markings while digging or excavating;
 Whereas the one-call system has helped reduce the number of digging damages caused by failure to locate underground utilities prior to digging from 57 percent in 2004 to 37.5 percent in 2009;
 Whereas the 1,400 members of the Common Ground Alliance, who are dedicated to ensuring public safety, environmental protection, and the integrity of services by promoting effective damage prevention practices, promote the national Call Before You Dig campaign to increase public awareness about the importance of calling 811 to identify the exact location of underground utility lines;
 Whereas the Common Ground Alliance has designated April as National Safe Digging month in order to increase awareness of safe digging practices across the country and to celebrate the anniversary of the designation of 811 as the national Call Before You Dig number; and
 Whereas April is the beginning of the peak of excavation projects around the Nation: Now, therefore, be it
 That the House of Representatives supports the goals and ideals of National Safe Digging Month, and encourages all homeowners and excavators throughout the country to call 811 before conducting any digging or excavation activities.
 Lorraine C. Miller,Clerk.