text:
nároky z neplatného rozviazania pracovného pomeru - NS-SR/Judikáty.info
 Nájdené rozsudky pre výraz: nároky z neplatného rozviazania pracovného pomeru
 vyhľadávací dotaz: nároky z neplatného rozviazania pracovného pomeru
 narok nájdené 119493 krát v 29724 dokumentoch
 platny nájdené 31125 krát v 12604 dokumentoch
 rozviazania nájdené 435 krát v 133 dokumentoch
 pracovna nájdené 31661 krát v 7705 dokumentoch
 pomer nájdené 73979 krát v 36495 dokumentoch
 Krajské súdy SR 51 dokumentov
 ... . Ustanovenia § 61 až § 64 Zákonníka práce (zaradené v štvrtom oddiely pod názvom „Nároky z neplatného rozviazania pracovného pomeru“) upravujú práva a povinnosti účastníkov pracovného pomeru v období pretrvávajúcej spornosti ich vzťahov v dôsledku ... Zákonníka práce a nebolo potrebné upravovať ho na iných miestach Zákonníka práce, napr. pri úprave nárokov z neplatného rozviazania pracovného pomeru. Bolo by aj v rozpore s dobrými mravmi, keby mal byť materiálne poškodený nezákonným konaním .
 Merito Konanie pred súdom. Dovolanie. Súdne poplatky.
 Kľúčové slová: oslobodenie od poplatku, nezaplatenie súdneho poplatku , neplatné rozviazanie pracovného pomeru, odňatie možnosti konať pred súdom
 R 50/1997
 Právna veta: Žalobca, ktorý uplatňuje nároky z neplatného rozviazania pracovného pomeru, je v občianskom súdnom konaní oslobodený od platenia poplatkov (§ 4 ods. 2 písm. d/ zákona č. 71/1992 Zb. v platnom znení.) Toto oslobodenie sa vzťahuje aj na konanie o odvolaní, dovolaní a výkone rozhodnutia. Zastavenie konania pre nezaplatenie súdneho poplatku podľa § 10 ods. 2 zákona č. 71/1992 Zb., hoci pre tento postup nebol zákonný dôvod, je odňatím možností účastníkovi konať pred súdom podľa § 237 písm. f) O.s.p.
 ... oslobodený navrhovateľ v konaní o náhradu škody z pracovného úrazu a choroby z povolania a pri uplatnení nárokov z neplatného rozviazania pracovného pomeru. Citované ustanovenie zahrňuje všetky veci týkajúce sa nárokov z neplatného rozviazania pracovného pomeru podľa druhej časti štvrtého oddielu Zákonníka práce (§ 61 až § 64), teda aj pokiaľ išlo .
 Merito Pracovný pomer
 Kľúčové slová: okamžité zrušenie pracovného pomeru, neplatnosť skončenia pracovného pomeru podľa § 77 ZP, dovolanie v sporovom konaní, náhrada mzdy podľa § 79 ZP
 R 48/1997
 Právna veta: Ak zamestnanec po doručení okamžitého zrušenia pracovného pomeru neoznámil zamestnávateľovi, ktorý tento zrušovací prejav urobil, že trvá na ďalšom zamestnaní, ale podal žalobu o neplatnosť rozviazania pracovného pomeru a o náhradu mzdy, potom je tým oznámenie zamestnanca voči zamestnávateľovi, že trvá na ďalšom zamestnávaní, nahradené dňom jej doručenia.
 ... . 3 písm. b) Zák. práce). Citované ustanovenie § 61 Zák. práce upravuje teda zamestnancove nároky z neplatného rozviazania pracovného pomeru zamestnávateľom. Môže ísť o neplatnú výpoveď, či neplatné okamžité zrušenie pracovného pomeru (zrušenie v skúšobnej dobe ... ustanoveniach §§ 61 až 64 Zák. práce sa týka nárokov, ktoré spolu súvisia. Ide o nároky z neplatného rozviazania pracovného pomeru. Základným nárokom je právo zamestnanca domáhať sa na súde určenia neplatnosti rozviazania pracovného pomeru. Ďalej .
 Merito Lehoty na uplatnenie nároku na náhradu mzdy z neplatného skončenia pracovného pomeru
 Kľúčové slová: lehota na uplatnenie práva na určenie neplatnosti skončenia pracovného pomeru, neplatnosť rozviazania pracovného pomeru, nárok na náhradu mzdy pri neplatnom rozviazaní pracovného pomeru, premlčacia doba
 R 8/2003
 Právna veta: Dvojmesačná lehota vyplývajúca z ustanovenia § 64 Zákonníka práce (zákon č. 65/1965 Zb. v znení platnom do 1. apríla 2002) sa týka len uplatnenia neplatnosti rozviazania pracovného pomeru a nie aj uplatnenia nárokov na náhradu mzdy z neplatného skončenia pracovného pomeru.
 ... v ustanovení § 61 až § 64 Zákonníka práce sa týka nárokov, ktoré spolu súvisia. Ide o nároky z neplatného rozviazania pracovného pomeru. Základným nárokom je právo zamestnanca domáhať sa na súde určenia neplatnosti rozviazania pracovného pomeru. Ďalej ide ... zmysle § 61 ods. 1 Zákonníka práce, dospel krajský súd k záveru, že žalobca sa svojich nárokov z neplatného rozviazania pracovného pomeru výpoveďou domáhal až po uplynutí zákonnej dvojmesačnej lehoty, keď až na pojednávaní 13. októbra 1993 uplatnil .
 Merito Súd rozhodujúci o náhrade mzdy viazaný dozhodnutím súdu o určení platnosti alebo neplatnosti skončenia pracovného pomeru
 Kľúčové slová: súd rozhodujúci o náhrade mzdy, rozhodnutie súdu o určení platnosti alebo neplatnosti skončenia pracovného pomeru, nárok na náhradu mzdy z dôvodu neplatného skončenia pracovného pomeru zo strany zamestnávateľa, neplatné skončenie pracovného pomeru zo strany zamestnávateľa, satisfakcia voči zamestnancovi a sankcia voči zamestnávateľovi
 Právna veta: Rozhodnutím súdu o určení platnosti alebo neplatnosti skončenia pracovného pomeru je súd rozhodujúci o náhrade mzdy viazaný a bez kladného rozhodnutia o neplatnosti skončenia pracovného pomeru sa nemožno s úspechom domáhať nároku na náhradu mzdy. Rozsah nároku na náhradu mzdy závisí od toho, kedy zamestnanec oznámil zamestnávateľovi svoje rozhodnutie, aby ho ďalej zamestnával. Nárok na náhradu mzdy trvá až do času, kedy mu zamestnávateľ umožní pokračovať v práci alebo keď dôjde k platnému skončeniu pracovného pomeru. Náhrada mzdy podľa § 61 ods. 1 Zákonníka práce sa môže zamestnancovi priznať ...
 ... , ak je splatná v čase vydania súdneho rozhodnutia, nemožno ju zásadne priznať ako opakujúcu sa dávku do budúcnosti. Osobitná úprava nárokov z neplatného rozviazania pracovného pomeru v ustanoveniach § 61 a nasl. Zákonníka práce vylučuje použitie všeobecných ustanovení o náhrade mzdy pri prekážkach v práci na .
 Merito Preskúmanie rozhodnutia zamestnávateľa o skončení štátozamestnaneckého pomeru a žiadosť zamestnanca o oslobodenie od súdnych poplatkov
 Kľúčové slová: pôsobnosť zákonníka práce, oslobodenie od súdnych poplatkov, skončenie štátozamestnaneckého pomeru
 Právna veta: Zákonník práce vymedzuje svoju subsidiárnu pôsobnosť vo vzťahu k štátnej službe nasledovne: „na právne vzťahy pri výkone štátnej služby sa vzťahuje tento zákon, len ak to ustanovuje osobitný predpis,“ t.j. zákon o štátnej službe v ustanovení § 149. Neplatnosť skončenia pracovného pomeru výpoveďou, okamžitým skončením, skončením v skúšobnej dobe alebo dohodou a nároky z neplatného skončenia pracovného pomeru sú upravené v Zákonníku práce v ustanoveniach § 77 – § 80. Tieto ustanovenia sa však na oblasť štátnej služby nevzťahujú (porovnajte s § 149 zákona o štátnej službe). Nie je preto možné z t ...
 ... ktorý sa žalobca odvoláva, sa vzťahuje na všetky veci týkajúce sa nárokov z neplatného rozviazania pracovného pomeru a pri uplatnení nárokov z neplatného rozviazania pracovného pomeru podľa Zákonníka práce. Toto oslobodenie má charakter osobného oslobodenia a súd ... o rozviazaní štátnozamestnaneckého pracovného pomeru so žalobcom, a ktorých zrušením si žalobca uplatňuje nároky z neplatného rozviazania pracovného pomeru. Následne Krajský súd v Nitre zisťoval u žalobcu dôvody na priznanie oslobodenia od .
 Merito Vykonania všetkých navrhovaných dôkazov
 Kľúčové slová: dôkazné prostriedky, priebeh konania, vykonávanie dôkazov, nevykonanie dôkazov
 Právna veta: V sporovom konaní, o ktoré ide aj v prejednávanej veci, platí dispozičná a prejednacia zásada. Účastníci sú v ňom povinní prispieť k tomu, aby sa dosiahol účel konania najmä tým, že pravdivo a úplne opíšu všetky potrebné skutočnosti a označia dôkazné prostriedky (viď § 101 ods. 1 O.s.p.). Súdna prax je jednotná v tom, že ak súd v priebehu konania nevykoná všetky navrhované dôkazy, nezakladá to vadu konania v zmysle § 237 písm. f/ O.s.p. (viď R 37/1993, R 125/1999, R 6/2000). Pokiaľ súd niektorý navrhovaný dôkaz nevykoná, môže to viesť (nanajvýš) k nesprávnym skutkovým zisteniam a v koneč ...
 ... za nedoručenú, a preto ani neskúmal dôvody okamžitého skončenia pracov ného pomeru a vyhovel žalobe a vylúčil na samostatné konanie nároky z neplatného rozviazania pracovného pomeru a to náhradu mzdy. Na odvolanie odporkyne Krajský súd v Košiciach rozsudkom z 31. augusta 2009 sp. zn. 7. apríla .
 Merito Prechod práv a povinností z pracovnoprávnych vzťahov na nadobúdateľa majetku podniku.
 Kľúčové slová: nadobúdateľ majetku podniku, prechod práv a povinností z pracovnoprávnych vzťahov, privatizácia podniku, zamestnanci privatizovaného podniku, spor o určenie trvania pracovného pomeru, spor o neplatnost rozviazania pracovného pomeru, zoznam preberaných zamestnancov , privatizačná zmluva
 Právna veta: Prechod práv a povinností z pracovnoprávnych vzťahov na nadobúdateľa majetku podniku ( jeho organizačnej zložky) je odôvodnený tým, aby zostala v záujme ekonomického využitia podniku (jeho organizačnej zložky) zachovaná jednota hmotných, osobných a nehmotných zložiek podnikania. V rámci prechodu práv a povinností z pracovnoprávnych vzťahov však prechádzajú na nadobúdateľa práva a povinnosti nielen voči tým zamestnancom, ktorých pracovnoprávny vzťah v dobe prechodu voči privatizovanému podniku (doterajšiemu zamestnávateľovi) trval, prípadne voči organizačnej zložke. Uvedený prechod p ...
 ... pomeru zo strany zamestnávateľa môže domáhať ochrany svojho tvrdeného práva návrhom na určenie neplatnosti skončenia pracovného pomeru s tým, že nároky z neplatného rozviazania pracovného pomeru upravujú ustanovenia § 61 až § 64 Zákonníka práce. V prípade, že by navrhovateľka žiadala vyslovenie neplatnosti skončenia pracovného pomeru .
 Merito Premlčacia doba na uplatnenie nároku na náhradu mzdy z neplatného rozviazania pracovného pomeru
 Kľúčové slová: náhrada mzdy z neplatného rozviazania pracovného pomeru, začiatok plynutia premlčacej lehoty, premlčacia doba na uplatnenie nároku na náhradu mzdy z neplatného rozviazania pracovného pomeru, neplatné skončenie pracovného pomeru zo strany zamestnávateľa, splatnosť náhrady mzdy
 Právna veta: Premlčacia doba na uplatnenie nároku na náhradu mzdy z neplatného rozviazania pracovného pomeru nezačína plynúť od právoplatnosti rozsudku o určení neplatnosti rozväzovacieho prejavu, ale od splatnosti každej jednotlivej náhrady mzdy za príslušný mesiac, za ktorý sa požaduje (porovnaj tiež uznesenie Najvyššieho súdu Slovenskej republiky sp.zn. 1 Cdo 180/2009). Správne, zákonu zodpovedajúce sú úvahy odvolacieho súdu, že pre začiatok plynutia premlčacej lehoty práva na náhradu mzdy z neplatného rozviazania pracovného pomeru, je rozhodujúci okamih, kedy nastáva splatnosť náhrady mzdy a ž ...
 ... neplatnosť rozviazania pracovného pomeru. Vytýkal odvolaciemu súdu, že nedôvodne aplikoval na ve c ustanovenie § 119 Záko nníka práce , lebo nároky z neplatného rozviazania pracovného pomeru majú špeciálnu právnu úpravu nachádzajúcu sa v ustanovení § 61 a nasl. Zákonníka práce. Náhrada mzdy v zmysle § 61 .


type: legislation

jurisdiction: EU

text:
 EUROPSKA KOMISIJA
 Bruxelles, 20.4.2016.
 COM(2016) 236 final
 2016/0125(COD)
 Prijedlog
 UREDBE EUROPSKOG PARLAMENTA I VIJEĆA
 o izmjeni Uredbe (EZ) br. 539/2001 o popisu trećih zemalja čiji državljani moraju imati vizu pri prelasku vanjskih granica i zemalja čiji su državljani su izuzeti od tog zahtjeva
 (Ukrajina)
 OBRAZLOŽENJE
 1.KONTEKST PRIJEDLOGA
 •Razlozi i ciljevi prijedloga
 Dijalog između EU-a i Ukrajine o liberalizaciji viznog režima pokrenut je u listopadu 2008. U studenome 2010. Europska komisija predstavila je ukrajinskoj vladi akcijski plan za liberalizaciju viznog režima (VLAP). Komisija se obvezala predložiti da se državljanima Ukrajine koji imaju biometrijsku putovnicu odobri putovanje u Europsku uniju bez vize za kratkotrajni boravak čim ukrajinska vlada zadovolji sva mjerila iz VLAP-a.
 Prije početka dijaloga o liberalizaciji viznog režima, EU i Ukrajina istovremeno su sklopili sporazum o pojednostavnjenju izdavanja viza te sporazum o ponovnom prihvatu; ti su sporazumi stupili na snagu 1. siječnja 2008. Izmijenjeni sporazum o pojednostavnjenju izdavanja viza stupio je na snagu 1. srpnja 2013. Potpuna i učinkovita provedba tih sporazuma preduvjet je za pokretanje dijaloga o vizama i uvjet za njegov nastavak.
 VLAP se sastoji od četiri „bloka”: sigurnosti isprava, uključujući biometrijske podatke (I. blok), migracija i integriranog upravljanja granicama, uključujući azil (II. blok), javnog reda i sigurnosti (III. blok) te vanjskih odnosa i temeljnih prava (IV. blok). U VLAP-u se utvrđuje niz preciznih mjerila za svaki od tih četiriju „blokova” u pogledu tehnički relevantnih pitanja u cilju donošenja zakonodavnog, političkog i institucijskog okvira (1. faza) te osiguravanja njegove održive provedbe (2. faza).
 Od pokretanja dijaloga o liberalizaciji viznog režima između EU-a i Ukrajine Komisija izvješćuje Europski parlament i Vijeće o napretku Ukrajine prema zadovoljavanju mjerila utvrđenih u okviru četiriju blokova iz prve i druge faze VLAP-a. Napredak se ocjenjuje na temelju evaluacija na licu mjesta koje vrše stručnjaci iz država članica EU-u te detaljnih informacija koje dostavlja Ukrajina.
 Komisija je 16. rujna 2011. donijela svoje prvo izvješće o napretku
 1
 u provedbi VLAP-a u Ukrajini te je dala nekoliko preporuka za dovršenje prve faze (zakonodavstvo i planiranje). Komisija je svoje drugo izvješće o napretku
 2
 objavila 9. veljače 2012., a treće
 3
 15. studenoga 2013. Nakon četvrtog izvješća Komisije
 4
 od 27. svibnja 2014. te nakon što ga je Vijeće prihvatilo 23. lipnja 2014., Ukrajina je službeno ušla u drugu fazu VLAP-a, tijekom koje je provedena ocjena održive provedbe zakonodavnog i političkog okvira.
 Komisija je 8. svibnja 2015. donijela peto izvješće o napretku
 5
 u provedbi VLAP-a u Ukrajini. U tom je izvješću navedeno da su ukrajinska nadležna tijela postigla znatan napredak u provedbi druge faze VLAP-a. U skladu s metodologijom opisanom u VLAP-u Komisija je organizirala evaluacije na licu mjesta u kojima su sudjelovali stručnjaci iz država članica EU-a. Izvješće je popraćeno ocjenom mogućih migracijskih i sigurnosnih učinaka buduće liberalizacije viznog režima za građane Ukrajine koji putuju u EU.
 U šestom i konačnom izvješću o napretku
 6
 , donesenom 18. prosinca 2015., Komisija je zaključila da je Ukrajina ostvarila potreban napredak i poduzela sve potrebne reforme kako bi osigurala učinkovito i održivo zadovoljavanje preostalih mjerila.
 Na temelju te ocjene i s obzirom na rezultate trajnog praćenja i izvješćivanja provedenih od pokretanja dijaloga o liberalizaciji viznog režima između EU-a i Ukrajine, Komisija je potvrdila da je Ukrajina zadovoljila sva mjerila utvrđena za svaki od četiri bloka druge faze VLAP-a te da će početkom 2016. dati zakonodavni prijedlog za izmjenu Uredbe (EZ) br. 539/2001 tako da se Ukrajina prebaci na popis zemalja čijim državljanima nisu potrebne vize (Prilog II.).
 Nadalje, Komisija je od donošenja šestog izvješća primijetila napredak ukrajinskih nadležnih tijela u provedbi potrebnih reformi u okviru VLAP-a. Nacionalni ured za borbu protiv korupcije aktivan je i započeo je suradnju s posebnim antikorupcijskim tužiteljstvom. Nakon uspješnog donošenja zakona o povratu imovine i izmjena Zakona o Uredu tužiteljstva povezanog s Uredom posebnog tužitelja za borbu protiv korupcije (18. veljače 2016.) te Zakona o elektronskim imovinskim karticama (15. ožujka 2016.), primijećen je daljnji napredak kad su sredinom ožujka 2016. imenovana još dva člana Odbora Nacionalne agencije za sprečavanje korupcije, čime se Odboru omogućilo da postigne kvorum. Ravnatelj Agencije izabran je 28. ožujka, a 30. ožujka Agencija je registrirana kao pravni subjekt. Ukrajinska nadležna tijela u državnom su proračunu za 2016. dodijelila financijska sredstva i za osiguravanje funkcionalnog institucijskog okvira za borbu protiv korupcije, uključujući Nacionalni ured za borbu protiv korupcije.
 Uz izvješćivanje o VLAP-u, Komisija je i trajno nadzirala provedbu sporazuma o pojednostavnjenju izdavanja viza i sporazuma o ponovnom prihvatu, posebno u okviru zajedničkih odbora uspostavljenih na temelju tih sporazuma. Posljednja sjednica Zajedničkog odbora za pojednostavnjenje izdavanja viza održana je 23. travnja 2015., a Zajednički odbor za ponovni prihvat posljednji se put sastao 6. svibnja 2014. U tom je kontekstu Komisija napomenula da je provedba sporazuma općenito bila vrlo zadovoljavajuća.
 •Usklađenost s postojećim propisima u tom području politike i drugim politikama Unije
 U Uredbi Vijeća (EZ) br. 539/2001
 7
 navode se treće zemlje čiji državljani moraju imati vizu pri prelasku vanjskih granica država članica i zemlje čiji su državljani izuzeti od tog zahtjeva. Uredba (EZ) br. 539/2001 primjenjuje se u svim državama članicama, osim Irske i Ujedinjene Kraljevine, kao i u Islandu, Lihtenštajnu, Norveškoj i Švicarskoj. Ta je Uredba dio zajedničke vizne politike EU-a za kratak boravak od 90 dana u bilo kojem razdoblju od 180 dana.
 Ukrajina je trenutačno navedena u Prilogu I. Uredbi (EZ) br. 539/2001, tj. među zemljama čiji državljani moraju imati vizu pri putovanju na područje država članica EU-a.
 Uredba (EZ) br. 539/2001 zadnje je izmijenjena Uredbom (EU) br. 259/2014
 8
 , kad je Moldova nakon uspješne provedbe svojeg VLAP-a prebačena na popis zemalja čijim državljanima nisu potrebne vize, te Uredbom (EU) br. 509/2014
 9
 kad su pet karipskih
 10
 i jedanaest pacifičkih država
 11
 te Kolumbija, Peru i Ujedinjeni Arapski Emirati nakon redovitog preispitivanja viznih popisa izuzeti od obveze posjedovanja vize, podložno sklapanju sporazuma o ukidanju viza između EU-a i tih trećih zemalja.
 Kriteriji koje bi trebalo uzeti u obzir pri utvrđivanju, na temelju pojedinačne ocjene, trećih zemalja čiji državljani moraju imati vizu ili su izuzeti od tog zahtjeva utvrđeni su u članku –1. Uredbe (EZ) br. 539/2001 (kako je uvedeno Uredbom (EU) br. 509/2014). Ti se kriteriji odnose na „nezakonitu imigraciju, javni poredak i sigurnost, ekonomske pogodnosti, posebno u vidu turizma i vanjske trgovine te na vanjske odnose Unije s predmetnim trećim zemljama, posebno uključujući pitanja ljudskih prava i temeljnih sloboda kao i posljedice regionalne usklađenosti i uzajamnosti”
 12
 . Posebnu pozornost trebalo bi posvetiti sigurnosti putnih isprava koje izdaju dotične treće zemlje.
 Budući da je Ukrajina već izuzela sve građane EU-a od obveze posjedovanja vize za boravak od najviše godinu dana, nema razloga da se provedba izuzeća od obveze posjedovanja vize za državljane Ukrajine uvjetuje sklapanjem sporazuma o ukidanju viza s EU-om. Ako se ta odluka opozove ili se bezvizni režim zlouporabi, postojeći mehanizmi uzajamnosti i suspenzije iz Uredbe (EZ) br. 539/2001 bili bi dostatna pravna sredstva.
 2.PRAVNA OSNOVA, SUPSIDIJARNOST I PROPORCIONALNOST
 •Pravna osnova
 Budući da će se ovim prijedlogom izmijeniti zajednička vizna politika EU-a, pravna je osnova prijedloga članak 77. stavak 2. točka (a) Ugovora o funkcioniranju Europske unije (UFEU). Predložena će Uredba predstavljati razvoj schengenske pravne stečevine.
 •Supsidijarnost
 Budući da je Uredba (EZ) br. 539/2001 pravni akt EU-a, može se izmijeniti samo jednakovrijednim pravnim aktom. Države članice ne mogu djelovati pojedinačno.
 •Proporcionalnost
 Vidjeti gore – nisu dostupne druge mogućnosti za postizanje cilja politike.
 •Odabir instrumenta
 Vidjeti gore.
 3.REZULTATI EX POST EVALUACIJA, SAVJETOVANJA S DIONICIMA I PROCJENE UČINAKA
 •Ex post evaluacija / provjera primjerenosti postojećeg zakonodavstva
 nije primjenjivo
 •Savjetovanja s dionicima
 Održavale su se redovite rasprave s državama članicama u Radnoj skupini Vijeća za istočnu Europu i srednju Aziju (COEST) i nekoliko prezentacija postupka liberalizacije viznog režima Europskom parlamentu.
 •Prikupljanje i primjena stručnog znanja
 Komisija je prikupila sveobuhvatne podatke o primjeni svih mjerila iz VLAP-a u Ukrajini. Konačno izvješće Komisije o napretku u Ukrajini popraćeno je radnim dokumentom službi Komisije
 13
 u kojem su navedene detaljnije popratne informacije o napretku u okviru svakog mjerila.
 •Procjena učinka
 U prilogu radnom dokumentu službi Komisija je predstavila ažuriranu činjeničnu analizu i informacije temeljene na statističkim podacima o mogućim migracijskim i sigurnosnim učincima liberalizacije viznog režima za državljane Ukrajine koji putuju u EU, na temelju informacija dobivenih od relevantnih agencija EU-a i dionika. Nije potrebna daljnja procjena učinka.
 •Primjerenost propisa i pojednostavnjenje
 nije primjenjivo
 •Temeljna prava
 Prijedlogom se ne utječe negativno na zaštitu temeljnih prava.
 4.UTJECAJ NA PRORAČUN
 nije primjenjivo
 5.OSTALI ASPEKTI
 •Planovi provedbe i mehanizmi praćenja, evaluacije i izvješćivanja
 Izmijenjena Uredba izravno će se primjenjivati od svojeg stupanja na snagu i države članice odmah će je početi primjenjivati. Nije potreban plan provedbe.
 Komisija će i dalje aktivno pratiti trajnu provedbu svih mjerila iz četiri bloka VLAP-a u Ukrajini putem postojećih struktura i dijaloga za pridruživanje te, prema potrebi, putem ad hoc mehanizama praćenja.
 •Dokumenti s obrazloženjima (za direktive)
 nije primjenjivo
 •Detaljno obrazloženje posebnih odredbi prijedloga
 Izmijenit će se Uredba (EZ) br. 539/2001 tako da se Ukrajina prebaci iz Priloga I. (Popis zemalja čijim su državljanima potrebne vize) u Prilog II. (Popis zemalja čijim državljanima nisu potrebne vize). Dodat će se bilješka u kojoj će se navesti da je ukidanje viza ograničeno na građane koji imaju biometrijsku putovnicu izdanu u skladu s normama Međunarodne organizacije za civilno zrakoplovstvo (ICAO).
 2016/0125 (COD)
 Prijedlog
 UREDBE EUROPSKOG PARLAMENTA I VIJEĆA
 o izmjeni Uredbe (EZ) br. 539/2001 o popisu trećih zemalja čiji državljani moraju imati vizu pri prelasku vanjskih granica i zemalja čiji su državljani su izuzeti od tog zahtjeva
 (Ukrajina)
 EUROPSKI PARLAMENT I VIJEĆE EUROPSKE UNIJE,
 uzimajući u obzir Ugovor o funkcioniranju Europske unije, a posebno njegov članak 77. stavak 2. točku (a),
 uzimajući u obzir prijedlog Europske komisije,
 nakon prosljeđivanja nacrta zakonodavnog akta nacionalnim parlamentima,
 djelujući u skladu s redovnim zakonodavnim postupkom,
 budući da:
 (1)U Uredbi Vijeća (EZ) br. 539/2001
 14
 navode se treće zemlje čiji državljani moraju imati vizu pri prelasku vanjskih granica država članica i zemlje čiji su državljani izuzeti od tog zahtjeva. Sadržaj popisa trećih zemalja iz Priloga I. i II. treba biti i ostati dosljedan kriterijima utvrđenima u toj Uredbi. Upućivanja na treće zemlje za koje se promijenila situacija u pogledu tih kriterija treba prenijeti iz jednog priloga u drugi, prema potrebi.
 (2)Komisija smatra da je Ukrajina zadovoljila sva mjerila utvrđena u akcijskom planu liberalizacije viznog režima predstavljenom ukrajinskoj vladi u studenome 2010. i stoga ispunjava kriterije za izuzimanje njezinih državljana od obveze pribavljanja vize kad putuju na područje država članica EU-a.
 (3)Ukrajinu bi stoga trebalo prebaciti iz Priloga I. Uredbi (EZ) br. 539/2001 u njezin Prilog II. Ukidanje viza trebalo bi se primjenjivati samo na građane koji imaju biometrijsku putovnicu izdanu u skladu s normama Međunarodne organizacije za civilno zrakoplovstvo (ICAO).
 (4)Ova Uredba predstavlja razvoj odredaba schengenske pravne stečevine, u kojoj Ujedinjena Kraljevina ne sudjeluje, u skladu s Odlukom Vijeća 2000/365/EZ
 15
 . Ujedinjena Kraljevina stoga ne sudjeluje u donošenju ove Uredbe te ona za nju nije obvezujuća niti se na nju primjenjuje.
 (5)Ova Uredba predstavlja razvoj odredaba schengenske pravne stečevine, u kojoj Irska ne sudjeluje, u skladu s Odlukom Vijeća 2002/192/EZ
 16
 . Irska stoga ne sudjeluje u donošenju ove Uredbe te ona za nju nije obvezujuća niti se na nju primjenjuje.
 (6)U pogledu Islanda i Norveške, ova Uredba predstavlja razvoj odredaba schengenske pravne stečevine u smislu Sporazuma sklopljenog između Vijeća Europske unije i Republike Islanda i Kraljevine Norveške o pridruživanju tih dviju država provedbi, primjeni i razvoju schengenske pravne stečevine, koje su obuhvaćene područjem iz članka 1. točke B Odluke Vijeća 1999/437/EZ
 17
 .
 (7)U pogledu Švicarske, ova Uredba predstavlja razvoj odredaba schengenske pravne stečevine u smislu Sporazuma između Europske unije, Europske zajednice i Švicarske Konfederacije o pridruživanju Švicarske Konfederacije provedbi, primjeni i razvoju schengenske pravne stečevine, koje su obuhvaćene područjem iz članka 1. točke B Odluke 1999/437/EZ u vezi s člankom 3. Odluke Vijeća 2008/146/EZ
 18
 .
 (8)U pogledu Lihtenštajna, ova Uredba predstavlja razvoj odredaba Schengenske pravne stečevine u smislu Protokola potpisanog između Europske unije, Europske zajednice, Švicarske Konfederacije i Kneževine Lihtenštajna o pristupanju Kneževine Lihtenštajna Sporazumu između Europske unije, Europske zajednice i Švicarske Konfederacije o pridruživanju Švicarske Konfederacije provedbi, primjeni i razvoju Schengenske pravne stečevine, što spada u područje iz članka 1. točke B Odluke Vijeća 1999/437/EZ u vezi s člankom 3. Odluke Vijeća 2011/350/EU
 19
 .
 DONIJELI SU OVU UREDBU:
 Članak 1.
 Uredba (EZ) br. 539/2001 mijenja se kako slijedi:
 (a)u Prilogu I. dijelu 1. („DRŽAVE”), briše se upućivanje na Ukrajinu.
 (b)u Prilogu II. dijelu 1. („DRŽAVE”) umeće se sljedeće upućivanje:
 „Ukrajina”*
 ______________
 *
 Ukidanje viza ograničeno je na građane koji imaju biometrijsku putovnicu izdanu u skladu s normama Međunarodne organizacije za civilno zrakoplovstvo (ICAO).
 Članak 2.
 Ova Uredba stupa na snagu dvadesetog dana od objave u Službenom listu Europske unije.
 Ova je Uredba u cijelosti obvezujuća i izravno se primjenjuje u državama članicama u skladu s Ugovorima.
 Sastavljeno u Bruxellesu
 Za Europski parlament
 Za Vijeće
 Predsjednik
 Predsjednik
 (1)
 SEC (2011) 1076 završna verzija.
 (2)
 SWD (2012) 10 završna verzija.
 (3)
 COM (2013) 809 završna verzija.
 (4)
 COM (2014) 336 završna verzija.
 (5)
 COM (2015) 200 završna verzija.
 (6)
 COM(2015) 905 završna verzija.
 (7)
 Uredba Vijeća (EZ) br. 539/2001 od 15. ožujka 2001. o popisu trećih zemalja čiji državljani moraju imati vizu pri prelasku vanjskih granica i zemalja čiji su državljani izuzeti od tog zahtjeva (SL L 81, 21.3.2001., str. 1.)
 (8)
 Uredba (EU) br. 259/2014 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća od 3. travnja 2014. o izmjeni Uredbe Vijeća (EZ) br. 539/2001 o popisu trećih zemalja čiji državljani moraju imati vizu pri prelasku vanjskih granica i zemalja čiji su državljani izuzeti od tog zahtjeva, SL L 105, 8.4.2014., str. 9.
 (9)
 Uredba (EU) br. 509/2014 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća od 15. svibnja 2014. o izmjeni Uredbe Vijeća (EZ) br. 539/2001 o popisu trećih zemalja čiji državljani moraju imati vizu pri prelasku vanjskih granica i zemalja čiji su državljani izuzeti od tog zahtjeva, SL L 149, 20.5.2014., str. 67.
 (10)
 Dominika, Grenada, Sveta Lucija, Sveti Vincent i Grenadini, Trinidad i Tobago,
 (11)
 Kiribati, Maršalovi Otoci, Mikronezija, Nauru, Palau, Samoa, Salomonovi Otoci, Istočni Timor, Tonga, Tuvalu, Vanuatu.
 (12)
 Članak 1. Uredbe Vijeća (EZ) br. 539/2001 od 15. ožujka 2001. o popisu trećih zemalja čiji državljani moraju imati vizu pri prelasku vanjskih granica i zemalja čiji su državljani izuzeti od tog zahtjeva
 (13)
 Radni dokument službi Komisije, SWD(2015) 705 završna verzija od 18.12.2015.
 (14)
 Uredba Vijeća (EZ) br. 539/2001 od 15. ožujka 2001. o popisu trećih zemalja čiji državljani moraju imati vizu pri prelasku vanjskih granica i zemalja čiji su državljani izuzeti od tog zahtjeva (SL L 81, 21.3.2001., str. 1.)
 (15)
 Odluka Vijeća 2000/365/EZ od 29. svibnja 2000. o zahtjevu Ujedinjene Kraljevine Velike Britanije i Sjeverne Irske za sudjelovanje u pojedinim odredbama schengenske pravne stečevine (SL L 131, 1.6.2000., str. 43.)
 (16)
 Odluka Vijeća 2002/192/EZ od 28. veljače 2002. o zahtjevu Irske za sudjelovanje u provedbi nekih odredbi schengenske pravne stečevine (SL L 64, 7.3.2002., str. 20.).
 (17)
 Odluka Vijeća 1999/437/EZ od 17. svibnja 1999. o određenim aranžmanima za primjenu Sporazuma sklopljenog između Vijeća Europske unije i Republike Islanda i Kraljevine Norveške o pridruživanju tih dviju država provedbi, primjeni i razvoju schengenske pravne stečevine (SL L 176, 10.7.1999., str. 31.).
 (18)
 Odluka Vijeća 2008/146/EZ od 28. siječnja 2008. o sklapanju, u ime Europske zajednice, Sporazuma između Europske unije, Europske zajednice i Švicarske Konfederacije o pridruživanju Švicarske Konfederacije provedbi, primjeni i razvoju schengenske pravne stečevine (SL L 53, 27.2.2008., str. 1.).
 (19)
 Odluka Vijeća 2011/350/EU od 7. ožujka 2011. o sklapanju Protokola između Europske unije, Europske zajednice, Švicarske Konfederacije i Kneževine Lihtenštajna o pristupanju Kneževine Lihtenštajna Sporazumu Europske unije, Europske zajednice i Švicarske Konfederacije o pristupanju Švicarske Konfederacije provedbi, primjeni i razvoju schengenske pravne stečevine, u vezi s ukidanjem kontrola na unutarnjim granicama i kretanju osoba, u ime Europske unije (SL L 160, 18.6.2011., str. 19.).


text:
 27.9.2016
 DA
 Den Europæiske Unions Tidende
 L 259/69
 KOMMISSIONENS GENNEMFØRELSESFORORDNING (EU) 2016/1720
 af 26. september 2016
 om faste importværdier med henblik på fastsættelse af indgangsprisen for visse frugter og grøntsager
 EUROPA-KOMMISSIONEN HAR —
 under henvisning til traktaten om Den Europæiske Unions funktionsmåde,
 under henvisning til Europa-Parlamentets og Rådets forordning (EU) nr. 1308/2013 af 17. december 2013 om en fælles markedsordning for landbrugsprodukter og om ophævelse af Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 922/72, (EØF) nr. 234/79, (EF) nr. 1037/2001 og (EF) nr. 1234/2007 (1),
 under henvisning til Kommissionens gennemførelsesforordning (EU) nr. 543/2011 af 7. juni 2011 om nærmere bestemmelser for anvendelsen af Rådets forordning (EF) nr. 1234/2007 for så vidt angår frugt og grøntsager og forarbejdede frugter og grøntsager (2), særlig artikel 136, stk. 1, og
 ud fra følgende betragtninger:
 (1)
 Ved gennemførelsesforordning (EU) nr. 543/2011 fastsættes der på basis af resultatet af de multilaterale handelsforhandlinger under Uruguayrunden kriterier for Kommissionens fastsættelse af faste importværdier for tredjelande for de produkter og perioder, der er anført i del A i bilag XVI til nævnte forordning.
 (2)
 Der beregnes hver arbejdsdag en fast importværdi i henhold til artikel 136, stk. 1, i gennemførelsesforordning (EU) nr. 543/2011 under hensyntagen til varierende daglige data. Derfor bør nærværende forordning træde i kraft på dagen for offentliggørelsen i Den Europæiske Unions Tidende —
 VEDTAGET DENNE FORORDNING:
 Artikel 1
 De faste importværdier som omhandlet i artikel 136 i gennemførelsesforordning (EU) nr. 543/2011 fastsættes i bilaget til nærværende forordning.
 Artikel 2
 Denne forordning træder i kraft på dagen for offentliggørelsen i Den Europæiske Unions Tidende.
 Denne forordning er bindende i alle enkeltheder og gælder umiddelbart i hver medlemsstat.
 Udfærdiget i Bruxelles, den 26. september 2016.
 På Kommissionens vegne
 For formanden
 Jerzy PLEWA
 Generaldirektør for landbrug og udvikling af landdistrikter
 (1) EUT L 347 af 20.12.2013, s. 671.
 (2) EUT L 157 af 15.6.2011, s. 1.
 BILAG
 Faste importværdier med henblik på fastsættelse af indgangsprisen for visse frugter og grøntsager
 (EUR/100 kg)
 KN-kode
 Tredjelandskode (1)
 Fast importværdi
 0702 00 00
 MA
 180,4
 ZZ
 180,4
 0707 00 05
 TR
 118,8
 ZZ
 118,8
 0709 93 10
 AR
 162,6
 TR
 141,7
 ZZ
 152,2
 0805 50 10
 AR
 108,6
 CL
 123,7
 TR
 109,1
 UY
 92,6
 ZA
 138,6
 ZZ
 114,5
 0806 10 10
 TR
 129,9
 ZA
 80,3
 ZZ
 105,1
 0808 10 80
 AR
 148,2
 BR
 97,9
 CL
 138,1
 NZ
 122,5
 US
 144,0
 ZA
 113,6
 ZZ
 127,4
 0808 30 90
 CL
 126,9
 CN
 92,9
 TR
 132,1
 ZA
 155,4
 ZZ
 126,8
 0809 30 10 , 0809 30 90
 TR
 128,6
 ZZ
 128,6
 (1) Landefortegnelse fastsat ved Kommissionens forordning (EU) nr. 1106/2012 af 27. november 2012 om gennemførelse af Europa-Parlamentets og Rådets forordning (EF) nr. 471/2009 om fællesskabsstatistikker over varehandelen med tredjelande for så vidt angår ajourføring af den statistiske lande- og områdefortegnelse (EUT L 328 af 28.11.2012, s. 7). Koden »ZZ« = »anden oprindelse«.


type: contracts

text:
 Avis juridique important
 |
 21997A0520(04)
 Additional Protocol to the Europe Agreement on trade in textile products between the European Community and Romania
 Official Journal L 127 , 20/05/1997 P. 0198 - 0253
 ADDITIONAL PROTOCOL to the Europe Agreement on trade in textile products between the European Community and RomaniaTHE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,of the one part, andTHE GOVERNMENT OF ROMANIA,of the other part,DESIRING to promote, with a view to permanent cooperation and in conditions providing the utmost security for trade, the mutual expansion and orderly and equitable development of trade in textile products between the European Community (hereinafter the 'Community`) and Romania;RESOLVED to take the fullest possible account of the serious economic and social problems at present affecting the textile industry in both importing and exporting countries, in particular in order to eliminate the real dangers of damage to both the Community and Romanian markets for textile products;BEARING IN MIND the objectives of the Europe Agreement between the Community and Romania signed in Brussels on 1 February 1993 and, in particular, those referred to in Article 1 thereof;HAVING REGARD to the Europe Agreement and in particular Article 15 thereof,HAVING REGARD to the Interim Agreement between the Community and Romania signed in Brussels on 1 February 1993 and in particular to Article 9 thereof,HAVING REGARD to Protocol No 1 on textile and clothing products to the Europe Agreement and to the Interim Agreement, and in particular to Article 3 thereof,HAVE DECIDED to conclude this Protocol and to this end have designated as their plenipotentiaries:THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION:Johannes Friedrich BESELERDeputy Director-General of the Directorate-General for External Economic Relations of the Commission of the European CommunitiesTHE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF ROMANIA:Ion PARGARUState Secretary at the Ministry of TradeWHO HAVE AGREED AS FOLLOWS:Article 11. The further development of trade and industrial cooperation between the textile and clothing industries in the Community and in Romania is an underlying principle of this Protocol which establishes the quantitative arrangements applicable to trade in textile and clothing products (hereinafter 'textile products`) originating in Romania and in the Community, which are listed in Annex I to this Protocol.2. Under the terms of this Protocol, all quantitative restrictions and measures of equivalent effect on imports in both Parties on textile products originating in the other Party, shall be eliminated at the end of the period referred to in Agreed Minute No 5 at the latest.3. Consultations will be held during the third year of application of this Protocol on the global situation and progress towards final liberalization.Article 21. The classification of the products covered by this Protocol is based on the tariff and statistical nomenclature of the Community (hereinafter called the 'combined nomenclature` or, in abbreviated form, 'CN`) and any amendments thereof.2. The Parties agree that the introduction of changes, such as changes in practices, rules, procedures and categorization of textile products, including those changes relating to the Harmonized System and the combined nomenclature, in the implementation or administration of those restrictions applied under this Protocol, should not affect the balance of rights and obligations between the Parties under this Protocol, adversely affect the access available to a Party, impede the full utilization of such access, or disrupt trade under this Protocol. The Party initiating any such changes shall inform the other Party before their entry into force.The procedures for implementation of classification changes are set out in Appendix A.3. The origin of the products covered by this Protocol shall be determined in accordance with the rules of origin in force in the Community.Romania shall be notified of any amendments to the said rules of origin.The procedures for checking the origin of the textile products are laid down in Appendix A.Article 31. Romania hereby agrees for each of the years of the Protocol's application to restrain its exports to the Community of the products included in Annex II and originating in Romania to the limits set out therein.2. The number and level of quantitative restrictions applied to direct imports of textile products, expressed in terms of CN codes, of Community origin into Romania for each year of the Protocol's application are listed in Annex III to this Protocol.3. Unless it is otherwise provided for in this Protocol, Romania and the Community hereby agree not to introduce new quantitative restrictions or measures of equivalent effect, on trade in textile products between the two Parties, and not to increase the number of existing ones as compared to those in force on 30 April 1993.4. Exports to the Community of textile products listed in Annex II and originating in Romania shall be subject to a double-checking system as specified in Appendix A.Article 41. Romania and the Community recognize the special and differential character of reimports of textile products into the Community after processing, manufacturing or working in Romania as a specific form of industrial and trade cooperation.2. Save where it is otherwise provided for in Appendix B, such reimports into the Community shall not be subject to the quantitative limits of the products established in Annex II, provided that they are effected in accordance with the regulations on economic outward processing traffic in force in the Community and are eligible for the specific arrangements laid down in Appendix B to this Protocol.Article 51. Imports into either of the Parties of textile products covered by this Protocol shall not be subject to the quantitative limits established in Annex II or Annex III, provided that they are declared to be for re-export from the importing Party in the same state or after processing, under the administrative system of control existing in the Parties.However, the release for home use of products imported into the Community under the conditions referred to above shall be subject to the production of an export licence issued by the competent authorities, and to proof of origin in accordance with Appendix A.2. Where the competent authorities in one Party have evidence that imports of textile products have been set off against a quantitative limit established under this Protocol, but that the products have subsequently been re-exported from that Party, the authorities concerned shall inform the authorities of the other Party within four weeks of the quantities involved and shall authorize imports of the same quantities of identical category of product, which shall not be set off against the quantitative limit established under this Protocol for the current or following year, as appropriate.3. Exports of both Parties of cottage industry fabrics woven on hand- or foot-operated looms, garments or other made up articles obtained manually from such fabrics, and of traditional folklore handicraft products shall not be subject to quantitative limits. However, exports of these products originating in Romania must meet the conditions laid down in Appendix C to this Protocol.Article 61. In any year, advance use of a portion of the quantitative limit established in Annex II for the following year shall be authorized for each category of products up to 6 % of the quantitative limit for the current year.Amounts delivered in advance shall be deducted from the corresponding quantitative limit established for the following year.2. Carry-over to the corresponding quantitative limit for the following year of amounts not used during any given Protocol year shall be authorized up to 10 % of the quantitative limit for the current year for the quantitative limits established in Annex II.3. In the case of Group I, transfers shall be allowed only in the following cases:- amounts may be transferred from category 1 to categories 2 and 3, or from categories 2 and 3 to category 1 up to 7 % of the quantitative limit for the category to which the transfer is made,- amounts may be transferred between categories 2 and 3 up to 7 % of the quantitative limits for the category to which the transfer is made,- the total quantities transferred to categories 2 and 3 in accordance with the first two indents of this paragraph may not exceed 7 % of the category to which the transfer is made,- amounts may be transferred between categories 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 up to 7 % of the quantitative limit for the category to which the transfer is made.Amounts may be transferred into any category in Groups II and III from any category in Groups I, II and III up to 10 % of the quantitative limit for the category to which the transfer is made.4. The table of equivalence applicable to the transfers referred to in paragraph 3 is given in Annex I.5. The increase in any given category of products resulting from the cumulative application of the provisions in paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 during a single year must not exceed the limits of 17 % for categories of products in Groups I, II and III.6. The authorities of the exporting Party must notify the other Party of any recourse to the provisions of paragraphs 1, 2 and 3, at least 15 days in advance.Article 71. Should one Party consider that imports of textile products not subject to quantitative limits, originating in the other Party and covered by this Protocol take place in such increased, absolute or relative, quantities or under such conditions, so as to threaten to cause injury to the importing Party's production of like or directly competitive products, or where the economic interests of the importing Party so require, it may, after examination of the relevant facts, impose a prior or retrospective surveillance system on the category of products, on the products, concerned for a period that it considers appropriate.2. The Party that intends to introduce a surveillance system under paragraph 1 shall inform at least one working day in advance of its introduction the other Party, and consultations may be requested by either Party under Article 14 of this Protocol.3. Where a surveillance system is established under this Article by the Community, the relevant provisions on double-checking, classification and certification of origin laid down in Appendix A shall be applied by Romania.Article 81. Exports of textile products to either Party which are not subject to quantitative limits, may be made subject to quantitative limits in accordance with the following paragraphs.2. Should one Party consider that imports of textile products originating in the other Party and covered by this Protocol take place in such increased quantities, or under such conditions, so as to cause serious damage or actual threat thereof, to the importing Party's production of like or directly competitive products, it may request consultations under Article 14 of this Protocol with a view to reaching agreement on an appropriate quantitative limit for the textile category in question.The quantitative limits agreed upon may in no case be lower than 110 % of the level of the importing Party's imports during the 12 month period terminating two months, or where data is not available three months, preceding the month in which the request for consultation is made, of products in that category originating in the other Party.3. In critical circumstances where delay would cause damage difficult to repair, action may be taken provisionally by the importing Party on the condition that the request for consultations shall be effected immediately afterwards. This action shall take the form of a quantitative restraint on Romanian exports to, or imports from, the Community, for a provisional three-month period starting from the date of the request. Such a provisional limit shall be set at 25 %, at least, of the level of imports or exports during the 12 month period terminating two months, or where data is not available three months, preceding the month in which the request for consultation is made.4. Should the consultations not lead to an agreed solution within one month, then the provisional restraint referred to in paragraph 3 can be either renewed for a further three-month period pending further consultations, or made definitive at an annual level not lower than 110 % of the imports for the 12 month period terminating two months, or where data is not available three months, preceding the month in which the request for consultation is made.5. Where paragraphs 2, 3 or 4 are applied, either Party shall authorize imports belonging to the textile category of products in question, which were shipped from the other Party before the submission of the request for consultation.Where paragraphs 2, 3 or 4 are applied, the Party concerned undertakes to issue export or import licences for products covered by contracts effectively concluded before the introduction of the quantitative limit, but up to the volume of the quantitative limit fixed.6. The duration of the measure and the annual growth rates to be applied to any quantitative limit introduced under this Article shall be decided when introducing the measure.7. The provisions of this Protocol which concern exports of products subject to the quantitative limits established in Annex II or Annex III shall also apply to products for which quantitative limits are introduced under this Article.8. Measures taken pursuant to the provisions of this Article can in no case remain in force after the period for the elimination of all quantitative restrictions, and measures of equivalent effect, laid down in this Protocol, has elapsed.Article 9Nothing in this Protocol prevents a Party from unilaterally removing a quantitative limitation or increasing the level of access under a limitation, should the conditions in its market so permit.Article 101. Romania undertakes to supply the Community with precise statistical information on all export and import licences issued by the Romanian authorities for all categories of textile products subject to the quantitative limits established under this Protocol, and on all certificates issued by the Romanian authorities for all products referred to in Article 5 (3), which are covered by the provisions of Appendix C to this Protocol.The Community shall similarly transmit to the Romanian authorities precise statistical information on import authorizations issued by the Community authorities in connection with the export licences and the certificates issued by Romania.2. For all categories of products, the information referred to in paragraph 1 shall be transmitted by the end of the month following the month to which the statistics relate.3. The Parties undertake to provide each other's authorities, by 15 April of each calendar year, with the preceding year's statistics on imports of all textile products covered by this Protocol.4. Either Party shall, at the other Party's request, transmit available statistical information on all exports of textile products covered by this Protocol.The Parties shall transmit to each other's authorities statistical information on the products covered by Article 5 (1).5. For all categories of products the information referred to in paragraph 4 shall be transmitted by the end of the third month following the quarter of the year to which the statistics relate.6. Should it be found, on analysis of the information exchanged, that there are significant discrepancies in the statistics between the returns for exports and those for imports, consultations may be held in accordance with the procedure specified in Article 14 of this Protocol.Article 111. In view of ensuring the effective functioning of this Protocol between Romania and the Community, the Parties agree to cooperate fully in order to prevent, to investigate and to take any necessary legal and/or administrative action against circumvention by transhipment, re-routing, false declaration concerning country or place of origin, falsification of documents, false declaration concerning fibre content, quantities, description or classification of merchandise and by whatever other means. Accordingly, Romania and the Community agree to establish the necessary legal provisions and administrative procedures permitting effective action to be taken against such circumvention, which shall include the adoption of legally binding corrective measures against exporters and/or importers involved.2. Should either Party believe on the basis of information available that the present Protocol is being circumvented, that Party will consult with the other Party with a view to reaching a mutually satisfactory solution. These consultations will be held as early as possible and at the latest within 30 days from the date of request.3. Pending the results of the consultations referred to in paragraph 2, either Party shall, as a precautionary measure, if so requested by the other Party, take all necessary measures to ensure that, where sufficient evidence of circumvention is provided, adjustments of quantitative limits liable to be agreed following the consultations referred to in paragraph 2, may be carried out for the quota year in which the request to open consultations in accordance with paragraph 2 was made, or for the following year if the quota for the current year is exhausted.4. Should the Parties be unable, in the course of the consultation referred to in paragraph 2, to reach a mutually satisfactory solution, the initiating Party shall have the right:(a) where there is sufficient evidence that products originating in the other Party have been imported in circumvention of the present Protocol, to set off the relevant quantities against the quantitative limits established under the Protocol;(b) where sufficient evidence shows that false declaration concerning fibre content, quantities, description or classification of products originating in the other Party has occurred, to refuse to import the products in question;(c) Should it appear that the territory of the other Party is involved in transhipment or re-routing of products not originating in that Party, to introduce quantitative limits against the same products originating in the other Party if they are not already subject to quantitative limits, or to take any other appropriate measures.5. Without prejudice to Protocol No 6 on mutual assistance in customs matters to the Europe Agreement, the Parties agree to establish a system of administrative cooperation to prevent and to address effectively all problems arising from circumvention in accordance with the provisions of Appendix A of this Protocol.Article 121. The quantitative limits established under this Protocol on imports into the Community of textile products of Romanian origin will not be broken down by the Community into regional shares.2. The Parties shall cooperate in order to prevent sudden and prejudicial changes in traditional trade flows resulting in regional concentration of direct imports into the Community.3. Romania shall monitor its exports into the Community of products under restraint or surveillance. Should a sudden and prejudicial change in traditional trade flows arise, the Community will be entitled to request consultations in order to find a satisfactory solution to those problems. Such consultations must be held within 15 working days of their being requested by the Community.4. Romania shall endeavour to ensure that exports of textile products subject to quantitative limits into the Community are spaced out as evenly as possible over the year due account being taken in particular of seasonal factors.Article 131. The Parties shall refrain from discrimination in the allocation of the export licences and import authorizations or documents referred to in Appendices A and C.2. Should either Party find that the application of this Protocol or the commercial practices of either Party are disturbing existing commercial relations between the Community and Romania consultations shall be started promptly, in accordance with the procedure specified in Article 14, with a view to remedying this situation.Article 141. Save where it is otherwise provided, the special consultation procedures referred to in this Protocol shall be governed by the following rules:- any request for consultations shall be notified in writing to the other Party,- the request for consultation shall be followed within 15 days of the notification by a statement setting out the reasons and circumstances which, in the opinion of the requesting Party, justify the submission of such a request,- the Parties shall enter into consultations within one month of notification of the request at the latest, with a view to reaching agreement or a mutually acceptable conclusion within one further month at the latest.2. If necessary, at the request of either of the Parties, consultations shall be held on any problems arising from the application of this Protocol. Any consultations held under this Article shall take place in a spirit of cooperation and with a desire to reconcile the differences between the Parties.Article 151. This Protocol shall enter into force on the first day of the month following the date on which the Parties notify each other of the completion of the procedures necessary for that purpose. This Protocol shall apply with effect from 1 May 1993. It shall expire at the end of the period referred to in Agreed Minute No 5.2. Either Party may at any time propose consultations in accordance with Article 14, with a view to agreeing amendments to this Protocol.3. Either Party may, at any time, denounce this Protocol by notifying the other Party. This Protocol shall cease to apply six months after the date of such notification and the quantitative limits established under this Protocol shall be reduced proportionately.4. The Annexes, Appendices, Agreed Minutes and Joint Memoranda attached to this Protocol shall form an integral part thereof.5. This Protocol shall form an integral part of the Europe Agreement between the Community and Romania, signed on 1 February 1993 and of the Interim Agreement signed between the Parties on the same date.Article 16This Protocol shall be drawn up in two copies in the Danish, Dutch, English, Finnish, French, German, Greek, Italian, Portuguese, Spanish, Swedish and Romanian languages, each of those texts being equally authentic.Hecho en Bruselas, el veintitrés de noviembre de mil novecientos noventa y cinco.Udfærdiget i Bruxelles, den treogtyvende november nitten hundrede og femoghalvfems.Geschehen zu Brüssel am dreiundzwanzigsten November neunzehnhundertfünfundneunzig. ̧ãéíå óôéò ÂñõîÝëëåò, óôéò åßêïóé ôñåéò Íïåìâñßïõ ÷ßëéá åííéáêüóéá åíåíÞíôá ðÝíôå.Done at Brussels on the twenty-third day of November in the year one thousand nine hundred and ninety-five.Fait à Bruxelles, le vingt-trois novembre mil neuf cent quatre-vingt-quinze.Fatto a Bruxelles, addì ventitré novembre millenovecentonovantacinque.Gedaan te Brussel, de drieëntwintigste november negentienhonderd vijfennegentig.Feito em Bruxelas, em vinte e três de Novembro de mil novecentos e noventa e cinco.Tehty Brysselissä kahdentenakymmenentenäkolmantena päivänä marraskuuta vuonna tuhatyhdeksänsataayhdeksänkymmentäviisi.Som skedde i Bryssel den tjugotredje november nittonhundranittiofem.Incheiat la Bruxelles, in ziua de douazecisitrei noiembrie a anului unamienouasutenouazecisicinci.Por la Comunidad EuropeaFor Det Europæiske FællesskabFür die Europäische GemeinschaftÃéá ôçí ÅõñùðáúêÞ ÊïéíüôçôáFor the European CommunityPour la Communauté européennePer la Comunità europeaVoor de Europese GemeenschapPela Comunidade EuropeiaEuroopan yhteisön puolestaPå Europeiska gemenskapens vägnar>REFERENCE TO A GRAPHIC>Pentru Guvernul Romaniei>REFERENCE TO A GRAPHIC>ANNEX I 1. When the constitutive material of the products of categories 1 to 114 is not specifically mentioned, these products are to be taken to be made exclusively of wool or of fine hair, of cotton or of man-made fibres.2. Garments which are not recognizable as being garments for men or boys or as being garments for women or girls are classified with the latter.3. Where the expression 'babies' garments` is used, this is meant to cover garments up to and including commercial size 86.>TABLE>>TABLE>>TABLE>>TABLE>>TABLE>>TABLE>>TABLE>ANNEX II (The full product descriptions of the categories listed in this Annex are to be found in Annex I to the Protocol)>TABLE>ANNEX III On 30 April 1993, Romania has no quantitative restrictions or measures of equivalent effect on imports of textile and clothing products originating in the Community.Appendix A TITLE I CLASSIFICATION Article 11. The competent authorities of the Community undertake to inform Romania of any changes in the combined nomenclature (CN) before the date of their entry into force in the Community.2. The competent authorities of the Community shall inform the competent authorities of Romania of any decisions relating to the classification of products subject to the present Protocol, within one month of their adoption at the latest. Such communication shall include:(a) a description of the products concerned;(b) the relevant category, related CN codes;(c) the reasons which have led to the decision.3. Where a classification decision results in a change of classification practice or a change in category of any product subject to the present Protocol, the affected products shall follow the trade regime applicable to the practice or category they fall into after such change, as provided for in this Protocol. Any such decision shall enter into force 30 days after it has been notified to the other Party.The Contracting Parties agree to enter into consultation in accordance with the procedures described in Article 14 of the Protocol with a view to honouring the obligation under Article 2 (2) of the Protocol.Products shipped before the date of the application of the decision shall remain subject to the earlier classification practice, provided that the goods in question are presented for importation within 60 days of that date.4. In case of divergent opinions between Romania and the competent Community authorities at the point of entry into the Community on the classification of products covered by the present Protocol, classification shall provisionally be based on indications provided by the importing parties, pending consultations in accordance with Article 14 with a view to reaching agreement on the classification concerned. In case no agreement can be reached, the classification of the goods is to be submitted to the Nomenclature Committee for a definitive classification in the Combined Nomenclature.TITLE II ORIGIN Article 21. Products originating in Romania for export to the Community in accordance with the arrangements established by the Protocol shall be accompanied by a certificate of Romanian origin conforming to the model annexed to this Appendix.2. However, products in Group III can be imported into the Community under the regime established by the Protocol on the presentation of a declaration of the exporter on the invoice or another commercial document, attesting that the products in question originate in Romania in accordance with the relevant provisions in force in the Community.3. The certificate of origin referred to in paragraph 1 is not required for the importation of goods covered by a movement certificate 'EUR 1` or a form 'EUR 2` issued in conformity with Protocol No 4 of the Europe Agreement.Article 3The certificate of origin is issued to the exporter only on receipt of a written request from either him or his representative. The competent authorities of Romania are obliged to ensure that the certificates of origin are correctly filled out; to this end they shall call for any necessary document, any evidence or carry out any check which they consider appropriate.Article 4Where different criteria for determining origin are laid down for products falling within the same category, the certificates or declarations of origin must contain a sufficiently detailed description of the goods so as to enable the criterion to be determined, on the basis of which the certificate was issued or the declaration drawn up.Article 5The discovery of slight discrepancies between details on the certificate of origin and those on the documents produced at the customs office when going through the import formalities for the goods, does not, ipso facto, cast doubt upon the statements in the certificate.TITLE III DOUBLE-CHECKING SYSTEM FOR THE CATEGORIES OF PRODUCTS SUBJECT TO COMMUNITY QUANTITATIVE LIMITS Section I Exportation Article 6The competent authorities of Romania shall issue an export licence in respect of all consignments from Romania of textile products referred to in Annex II, up to the relevant quantitative limits as may be modified under the provisions of this Protocol and of textile products subject to any quantitative limits or surveillance system established as a result of the application of Articles 7 and 8 of the Protocol.Article 71. The export licence shall conform to the model annexed to this Appendix and it shall be valid for exports throughout the customs territory to which the Treaty establishing the European Community is applied. However, where the Community has made recourse to the provisions of Articles 7 and 8 of the Protocol in accordance with the provisions of Agreed Minute No 1, or to Agreed Minute No 2, the textile products covered by the export licences can only be put into free circulation in the region(s) of the Community indicated in those licences.2. Each export licence must certify, inter alia, that the quantity of product in question has been set off against the quantitative limit established for the category of the product concerned and shall only cover one of the categories of products listed in Annex II of the Protocol. It is to be used for one or more consignments of the product in question.3. Where the conversion rate provided for in Annex II is applied, the following note must be inserted in box 9 of the export licence: 'Conversion rate for garments of a commercial size not exceeding 130 cm is to be applied`.Article 8The competent authorities of the Community must be informed immediately of the withdrawal or modification of any export licence already delivered.Article 91. Export shall be set off against the quantitative limits established for the year in which the shipment of the goods has been effected even if the export licence is issued in accordance with this Protocol after such shipment.2. For the purpose of applying paragraph 1, shipment of the goods is considered to have taken place on the date of their loading onto the exporting aircraft, vehicle or vessel.Article 10The presentation of an export licence, in application of Article 12 hereafter, shall be effected not later than 31 March of the year following that in which the goods covered by the licence were shipped.Section II Importation Article 11Importation into the Community of textile products subject to quantitative limits shall be subject to the presentation of an import authorization or document.Article 121. The competent authorities of the Community shall issue the import authorization or document, referred to in Article 11, automatically within a maximum of five working days of the presentation by the importer of the original of the corresponding export licence.2. The import authorizations shall be valid for six months from the date of their issue for imports throughout the customs territory to which the Treaty establishing the European Community is applied. However, where the Community has recourse to the provisions of Articles 7 and 8 of the Protocol in accordance with the provisions of Agreed Minute No 1, or to Agreed Minute No 2, the products covered by the import licences can only be put into free circulation in the region(s) of the Community indicated in those licences.3. The competent authorities of the Community shall cancel the authorization or import document already issued whenever the corresponding export licence has been withdrawn.However, if the competent authorities of the Community are notified of the withdrawal or the cancellation of the export licence only after the importation of the products into the Community, the relevant quantities shall be set off against the quantitative limits established for the category and the quota year concerned.Article 131. If the competent authorities of the Community find that the total quantities covered by export licences issued by Romania for a particular category in any year exceed the quantitative limit established for that category established in Annex II for that category as may be modified in accordance with the provisions of this Protocol, or any quantitative limit established in accordance with Article 8 of this Protocol, the said authorities may suspend the further issue of import authorizations or documents. In this event, the competent authorities of the Community shall immediately inform the authorities of Romania and the special consultation procedure set out in Article 14 of this Protocol shall be initiated forthwith.2. Exports of products of Romanian origin subject to quantitative limits or a surveillance system not covered by Romanian export licences issued in accordance with the provisions of this Appendix may be refused an import authorization or document by the competent Community authorities.However, if the import of such products is allowed into the Community by the competent authorities of the Community, the quantities involved shall not be set off against the appropriate quantitative limits established in Annex II, or established by virtue of Article 8 of the Protocol, without the express agreement of the competent authorities of Romania, save as provided for in Article 11 of the Protocol.TITLE IV FORM AND PRODUCTION OF EXPORT LICENCES AND CERTIFICATES OF ORIGIN, AND COMMON PROVISIONS CONCERNING EXPORTS OF THE COMMUNITY Article 141. The export licence and the certificate of origin may comprise additional copies duly indicated as such. They shall be made out in English or French. If they are completed by hand, entries must be in ink and in printed script.These documents shall measure 210 × 297 mm. The paper used shall be white writing paper, sized, not containing mechanical pulp, and weighing not less than 25 g/m2.If the documents have several copies only the top copy, which is the original, shall be printed with the guilloche pattern background. This copy shall be clearly marked as 'original` and the other copies as 'copies`. Only the original shall be accepted by the competent authorities of the Community as being valid for the control of export to the Community in accordance with the provisions of this Protocol.2. Each document shall bear a standardized serial number, whether or not printed, by which it can be identified.This number shall be composed of the following elements:- two letters identifying the exporting country as follows: RO,- two letters identifying the intended Member State of customs clearance as follows:AT - AustriaBL - BeneluxDE - GermanyDK - DenmarkEL - GreeceES - SpainFI - FinlandFR - FranceGB - United KingdomIE - IrelandIT - ItalyPT - PortugalSE - Sweden,- a one-digit number identifying quota year, corresponding to the last figure in the respective year, e.g. 7 for 1997,- a two-digit number from 01 to 99, identifying the particular issuing office concerned in the exporting country,- a five-digit number running consecutively from 00001 to 99999 allocated to the intended Member State of customs clearance.Article 15The export licence and the certificate of origin may be issued after the shipment of the products to which they relate. In such cases they must bear the endorsement 'delivré a posteriori` or the endorsement 'issued retrospectively`.Article 161. In the event of theft, loss or destruction of an export licence or a certificate of origin, the exporter may apply to the competent governmental authority which issued the document for a duplicate to be made out on the basis of the export documents in his possession. The duplicate of any such certificate or licence so issued shall bear the endorsement 'duplicata` or 'duplicate`.2. The duplicate shall bear the date of the original export licence or certificate of origin.TITLE V PROVISIONS CONCERNING COMMUNITY EXPORTS TO ROMANIA Article 17Should it be necessary, either Party may request consultations in accordance with Article 14 of the Protocol, in order to establish specific administrative provisions concerning Community exports to Romania.Such provisions shall afford the same or equivalent degree of protection to Community exporters as is provided for Romanian exporters under this Protocol.TITLE VI ADMINISTRATIVE COOPERATION Article 18The Community and Romania shall co-operate fully in the implementation of the provisions of this Protocol. To this end, contacts and exchanges of views, including on technical matters, shall be facilitated by both Parties.Article 19In order to ensure the correct application of this Appendix, the Community and Romania offer mutual assistance for the checking of the authenticity and the veracity of export licences and certificates of origin issued or of any declarations made within the terms of this Appendix.Article 20Romania shall transmit to the European Commission the names and addresses of the authorities competent to issue and verify the export licences and the certificates of origin, together with specimens of the stamps used by these authorities and specimen signatures of officials responsible for signing the export licences.Article 211. Subsequent verification of certificates of origin or export licences shall be carried out at random, or whenever the competent Community authorities have reasonable doubt as to the authenticity of the certificate or licence or as to the accuracy of the information regarding the true origin of the products in question.2. In such cases, the competent authorities in the Community shall return the certificate of origin or the export licence or a copy thereof to the competent Romanian authority, giving, where appropriate, the reasons of form or substance which justify an inquiry. If the invoice has been submitted, such invoice or a copy thereof shall be attached to the certificate or to the licence or their copies. The authorities shall also forward any information that has been obtained suggesting that the particulars given on the said certificate or licence are inaccurate.3. The provisions of paragraph 1 shall also apply to subsequent verifications of the declarations of origin provided for in Article 2 of this Appendix.4. The results of the subsequent verifications carried out in accordance with paragraphs 1 and 2 shall be communicated to the competent authorities of the Community within three months at the latest.The information communicated shall indicate whether the disputed certificate, licence or declaration, applies to the goods actually exported and whether these goods are eligible for export under the arrangements established by this Protocol. The information shall also include, at the request of the Community, copies of all the documentation necessary to fully determine the facts, and in particular the true origin of the goods.Should such verifications reveal systematic irregularities in the use of declarations of origin, the Community may subject imports of the products in question to the provisions of Article 2 (1) of this Appendix.5. For the purpose of subsequent verification of certificates of origin, copies of the certificates as well as any export documents referring to them shall be kept for at least three years by the competent Romanian authorities.6. Recourse to the random verification procedure specified in this Article must not constitute an obstacle to the release for home use of the products in question.Article 221. Where the verification procedure referred to in Article 21, or where information available to the competent authorities of the Community or of Romania indicates or appears to indicate that the provisions of this Protocol are being circumvented or infringed, the two Parties shall cooperate closely and with the appropriate urgency in order to prevent any such circumvention or infringement.2. To this end, the competent authorities of Romania shall, on their own initiative or at the request of the Community, carry out appropriate inquiries, or arrange for such inquiries to be carried out, concerning operations which are, or appear to the Community to be, in circumvention or infringement of this Protocol. Romania shall communicate the results of these inquiries to the Community, including any other pertinent information enabling the cause of the circumvention or infringement, including the true origin of the goods to be determined.3. By agreement between the Community and Romania, officials designated by the Community may be present at the inquiries referred to in paragraph 2.4. In pursuance of the cooperation referred to in paragraph 1, the competent authorities of the Community and Romania shall exchange any information considered by either Party to be of use in preventing circumvention or infringement of the provisions of this Protocol. These exchanges may include information on the production of textile products in Romania and on the trade in the type of products covered by this Protocol between Romania and third countries, particularly where the Community has reasonable grounds to consider that the products in question may be in transit across the territory of Romania prior to their importation into the Community. This information may include, at the request of the Community, copies of all available relevant documentation.5. Where sufficient evidence shows that the provisions of this Protocol have been circumvented or infringed, the competent authorities of Romania and the Community may agree to take the measures set out in Article 11 (4) of the Protocol, and any other measures as are necessary to prevent a recurrence of such circumvention or infringement.Annex I to Appendix A >START OF GRAPHIC>>END OF GRAPHIC>Annex II to Appendix A >START OF GRAPHIC>>END OF GRAPHIC>Appendix B Reimports into the Community, within the meaning of Article 4 (2) of the Protocol, of products listed in the Annex to this Appendix shall be subject to the provisions of this Protocol, unless the special provisions below provide otherwise:1. Subject to paragraph 2, only reimports into the Community of products affected by the specific quantitative limits laid down in the Annex to this Appendix shall be considered reimports within the meaning of Article 4 (2) of the Protocol.2. Reimports not covered by the Annex to this Appendix may be made subject to specific quantitative limits following consultations in accordance with the procedures set out in Article 14 of the Protocol, provided the products concerned are subject to quantitative limits under Annex II to the Protocol or to surveillance measures.3. Having regard to the interests of both Parties, the Community may at its discretion, or in response to a request from Romania under Article 14 of the Protocol, examine and give effect to:(a) the possibility of transferring from one category to another, using in advance or carrying over from one year to the next, portions of specific quantitative limits;(b) the possibility of increasing specific quantitative limits.4. However, the Community may apply automatically the flexibility rules set out in paragraph 3 within the following limits:(a) transfers between categories may not exceed 25 % of the quantity for the category to which the transfer is made;(b) carryover of a specific quantitative limit from one year to the next may not exceed 13,5 % of the quantity set for the year of actual utilization;(c) advance use of specific quantitative limits from one year to another may not exceed 7,5 % of the quantity set for the year of actual utilization.5. The Community shall inform Romania of any measures taken pursuant to the preceding paragraphs.6. The competent authorities in the Community shall debit the specific quantitative limits referred to in paragraph 1 at the time of issue of the prior authorization required by Council Regulation (EEC) No 636/82 which governs economic outward processing arrangements. A specific quantitative limit shall be debited for the year in which a prior authorization is issued.7. Transfers from one category to another and combined debits from the quantitative limit for products of Group II and III will be calculated in accordance with the table of equivalence in Annex I to the Agreement.8. A certificate of origin made out by the organizations authorized to do so under Romanian law shall be issued, in accordance with Appendix A to the Protocol, for all products covered by this Appendix. This certificate shall bear a reference to the prior authorization mentioned in paragraph 6 above as evidence that the processing operation it describes has been carried out in Romania.9. The Community shall provide Romania with the names and addresses of, and specimens of the stamps used by, the competent authorities of the Community which issue the prior authorizations referred to in paragraph 6 above.10. Without prejudice to the provisions of paragraphs 1 to 9 above, Romania and the Community shall continue consultations with a view to reaching a mutually acceptable solution enabling both Parties to benefit from the Protocol's provisions on outward processing traffic and so ensure the effective development of trade in textile products between Romania and the Community.Annex to Appendix B (The full product descriptions of the categories listed in this Annex are to be found in Annex I to the Protocol)OUTWARD PROCESSING TRAFFIC >TABLE>Appendix C (Referred to in Article 5 (3)) Cottage industry and folklore products originating in Romania 1. The exemption provided for in Article 5 (3) in respect of cottage industry products shall apply to the following types of product only:(a) fabrics woven on looms operated solely by hand or foot, being fabrics of a kind traditionally made in the cottage industry of Romania;(b) garments or other textile articles of a kind traditionally made in the cottage industry of Romania obtained manually from the fabrics referred to above and sewn exclusively by hand without the aid of any machine;(c) traditional folklore products of Romania made by hand, in a list to be agreed between the Community and Romania.Exemption shall be granted in respect only of products covered by a certificate conforming to the specimen attached to this Appendix and issued by the competent authorities in the supplying Party. These certificates must indicate the reasons justifying their issuance; the competent authorities of the importing Party will accept them after having checked that the products concerned have fulfilled the conditions established in this Appendix. The certificates concerning the products envisaged in indent (c) must bear the stamp 'FOLKLORE` clearly marked. In the case of a difference of opinion between the Parties concerning the nature of these products, consultations shall be held within one month in order to resolve these differences.Should imports of any product covered by this Appendix reach proportions liable to cause problems within the Community, consultations with Romania shall be initiated as soon as possible, with a view to resolving the situation by the adoption, if necessary, of a quantitative limit, in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 14 of this Protocol.2. The provisions of Titles IV and V of Appendix A shall apply mutatis mutandis to the products covered by paragraph 1 of this Appendix.Annex to Appendix C >START OF GRAPHIC>>END OF GRAPHIC>Agreed Minute No 1 In the context of the Protocol between the European Economic Community and Romania on trade in textile and clothing products, initialled on 30 April 1993, the Parties agreed that Articles 7 and 8 of the Protocol do not preclude the Community, if the conditions are fulfilled, from applying the surveillance system or the safeguard measures for one or more of its regions in conformity with the principles of the internal market.In such an event, Romania shall be informed in advance of the relevant provisions of Appendix A to this Protocol to be applied, as appropriate.For the Government of RomaniaFor the Council of the European UnionAgreed Minute No 2 Notwithstanding Article 12 (1) of this Protocol, for imperative technical or administrative reasons or to find a solution to economic problems resulting from regional concentration of imports, or in order to combat circumvention and fraud of the provisions of this Protocol, the Community will establish for a limited period of time a specific management system in conformity with the principles of the internal market.However, if the Parties are unable to reach a satisfactory solution during the consultations provided for in Article 12 (3), Romania undertakes, if so requested by the Community, to respect temporary export limits for one or more regions of the Community. In such a case, these limits shall not preclude the importation into the region(s) concerned of products which were shipped from Romania on the basis of export licences obtained before the date of formal notification to Romania by the Community about the introduction of the above limits.The Community shall inform Romania of the technical and administrative measures, such as defined in the attached Note Verbale, that need to be introduced by both Parties in order to implement the above paragraphs in conformity with the principles of the internal market.For the Government of RomaniaFor the Council of the European UnionNote verbale The Directorate-General for External Relations of the Commission of the European Communities presents its compliments to the Mission of Romania to the European Communities and has the honour to refer to the Protocol on textile products negotiated between Romania and the Community initialled on 30 April 1993.The Directorate-General wishes to inform the Mission of Romania that the Community has decided to apply, starting from 1 May 1993, the provisions of paragraph 1 of Agreed Minute No 2 to the Protocol initialled on 30 April 1993. Consequently, the corresponding provisions of Articles 7 and 12 of Appendix A to the Protocol shall also be applied as of the above date.The Directorate-General for External Relations avails itself of this opportunity to renew to the Mission of Romania to the European Communities the assurance of its highest consideration.Agreed Minute No 3 In the context of the Protocol between the European Economic Community and Romania on trade in textile and clothing products, initialled in Brussels on 30 April 1993, the Parties agreed that Romania shall endeavour not to deprive certain regions of the Community which have traditionally had relatively small shares of Community quotas of imports of products serving as inputs for their processing industry.The Community and Romania further agree to hold consultations, should the need arise, in order to avert any problems which might occur in this respect.For the Government of RomaniaFor the Council of the European UnionAgreed Minute No 4 In the context of the Protocol between the European Economic Community and Romania on trade in textile and clothing products, initialled in Brussels on 30 April 1993, Romania agreed that, from the date of the request for and pending the consultations referred to in Article 12 (3), it shall cooperate by not issuing export licences that would further aggravate the problems resulting from the regional concentration of direct imports into the Community.For the Government of RomaniaFor the Council of the European UnionAgreed Minute No 6 In the context of the Protocol between the European Economic Community and Romania on trade in textile and clothing products, initialled in Brussels on 30 April 1993, the Parties agreed that carry-over to the corresponding quantitative limits for the year 1993 of amounts not used during the year 1992 under the Agreement on trade in textile products initialled in Brussels on 11 July 1986, as amended by the Exchange of Letters initialled on 20 September 1991, is authorized for the year 1993 up to 9 % of the corresponding quantitative limits for 1992.For the Government of RomaniaFor the Council of the European UnionExchange of notes The Directorate-General for External Relations of the Commission of the European Communities presents its compliments to the Mission of Romania to the European Communities and has the honour to refer to the Protocol on textile products between Romania and the Community initialled on 30 April 1993.The Directorate-General wishes to inform the Mission of Romania that while awaiting the completion of the necessary procedures for the conclusion and the coming into force to the Protocol, the Community is prepared to allow the provisions of the Protocol to apply de facto from 1 May 1993. This is on the understanding that either Party may at any time terminate this de facto application of the Protocol provided that 120 days' notice is given.The Directorate-General for External Relations would be grateful if the Mission would confirm its agreement to the foregoing.The Directorate-General for External Relations avails itself of this opportunity to renew to the Mission of Romania to the European Communities the assurance of its highest consideration.Exchange of notes The Mission of Romania to the European Communities presents its compliments to the Directorate-General for External Relations of the Commission of the European Communities and has the honour to refer to the Director-General's note regarding the Protocol on textile products between Romania and the Community initialled on 30 April 1993.The Mission of Romania wishes to confirm to the Directorate-General that while awaiting the completion of the necessary procedures for the conclusion and the coming into force of the Protocol, the Government of Romania is prepared to allow the provisions of the Protocol to apply de facto from 1 May 1993. This is on the understanding that either Party may at any time terminate this de facto application of the Protocol provided that 120 days' notice is given.The Mission of Romania to the European Communities avails itself of this opportunity to renew to the Directorate-General for External Relations the assurance of its highest consideration.


type: wikipedia

text:
The Hobos () ir 1999. gada janvārī dibināta latviešu mūzikas grupa.
 Visi četri The Hobos dalībnieki nāk no Liepājas, taču savu karjeru grupa aizsāka Rīgā. 1999. gada janvāra beigās, dibināšanas mēnesī, savu pirmo koncertu The Hobos sniedza kafejnīcā Ai, Karamba, kas mecenātiski atļāva grupai uzstāties, bet nedodot nekādu atlīdzību. Koncerta nejaušs novērotājs bija arī kāds no grupas "Prāta Vētra" dalībniekiem, kas The Hobos uzstāšanās laikā pusdienojis iepriekšminētajā kafejnīcā. Tika pieaicināti arī pārējie grupas "Prāta Vētra" dalībnieki, kas galu galā izvērsās par improvizētu pasākumu ar galdu iznešanu uz ielas.
 Sākotnēji bija domāts grupu nosaukt par The Studio Hobos, taču grupai tika ieteikts vārdu "studio" izmest, lai saīsinātu nosaukumu.
 Pirmais albums ar nosaukumu "Numbvision", kas iznāca 1999. gada decembrī, guva lielus panākumus un iemantoja Latvijas Mūzikas Ierakstu Gada Balvas titulu “Labākais pop & rock albums ‘99”. Uzfilmētais klips dziesmai "Christian (I'm gonna be)" ieguva arī 2000. gada labākā Latvijas videoklipa balvu.
 Arī otrais albums "Perfect Solution", kas iznāca 2001. gadā, un trešais albums "Flashback Mornings", kas iznāca 2002. gadā, atzīmējās Latvijas Mūzikas ierakstu gada balvas vēsturē, iegūstot attiecīgi 2001. un 2002. gada labākā rock albuma balvu. Atsevišķu balvu ("labākā rock dziesma") 2002. gadā ieguva arī dziesma "Flying away" no albuma "Flashback Mornings".
 Ceturtais albums Radio Jah Jah iznāca 2004. gadā un tika veidots atzīmējot grupas pastāvēšanas piekto gadu. Albums sastāv no 2 diskiem, no kuriem pirmais ietver grupas oriģinālkompozīcijas, bet otrajā iekļautas dažādu populāru dziesmu kaverversijas.
 Kopš albuma Radio Jah Jah iznākšanas līdz pat 2015. gadam grupa bija salīdzinoši neaktīva, jo mūziķi piedalījās dažādos solo projektos un publiski uzstājās reti. 2009. gada pavasarī klubā Essential notika koncerts, kurā tika prezentēta arī jauna dziesma un mūzikas klips "I love you". Gadu vēlāk iznāca dziesma "Sober Sky". 2011. gadā The Hobos atklāja Kalnciema kvartāla vasaras koncertu sezonu. Nākamie koncerti notika 2013. gadā klubā "Laternu stundā" un 2015. gadā koncertzālē Palladium.
 2016. gada 17. janvārī grupas solistu un simbolu Rolandu Balodi-Ūdri Rīgā sabrauca mašīna, un viņš 5 nedēļas atradās komā. Rehabilitācija var aizņemt vairākus gadus, un nav zināms, vai Balodis-Ūdris spēs turpināt muzicēt ar grupu, tādēļ arī grupas turpmākais liktenis nav skaidrs.
 Diskogrāfija
 Grupas dalībnieki
 Rolands Balodis-Ūdris — solists
 Mārtiņš Burkevics — basģitārists
 Egons Kronbergs — ģitārists
 Vilnis Krieviņš — bundzinieks
 Atsauces
 1990. gadu mūzikas grupas
 2000. gadu mūzikas grupas
 2010. gadu mūzikas grupas
 Latvijas popgrupas
 Latvijas rokgrupas
 Latvijas poproka grupas


type: caselaw

text:
 7.1.2012
 EL
 Επίσημη Εφημερίδα της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης
 C 6/3
 Αναίρεση που άσκησε στις 21 Σεπτεμβρίου 2011 ο Katinan Justin Koné κατά της διατάξεως του Γενικού Δικαστηρίου (πέμπτο τμήμα) της 13ης Ιουλίου 2011 στην υπόθεση T-349/11, Koné κατά Συμβουλίου
 (Υπόθεση C-479/11 P)
 2012/C 6/04
 Γλώσσα διαδικασίας: η γαλλική
 Διάδικοι
 Αναιρεσείων: Katinan Justin Koné (εκπρόσωποι: L. Bourthoumieux, J. Vergès, R. Dumas και M. Ceccaldi, δικηγόροι)
 Αντίδικος κατ’ αναίρεση: Συμβούλιο της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης
 Αιτήματα του αναιρεσείοντος
 Ο αναιρεσείων ζητεί από το Δικαστήριο
 —
 κρίνει παραδεκτή την αίτηση αναιρέσεως του Katinan Justin Koné·
 —
 να αναιρέσει τη διάταξη T-349/11 της 13ης Ιουλίου 2011, με την οποία η προσφυγή του απορρίφθηκε ως εκπροθέσμως ασκηθείσα·
 —
 να αναπέμψει τον αναιρεσείοντα ενώπιον του Γενικού Δικαστηρίου προκειμένου αυτός να μπορέσει να προβάλει τα δικαιώματά του·
 —
 να καταδικάσει το Συμβούλιο της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης στα δικαστικά έξοδα κατ’ εφαρμογή των άρθρων 69 και 73 του Κανονισμού Διαδικασίας του Δικαστηρίου.
 Λόγοι αναιρέσεως και κύρια επιχειρήματα
 Προς στήριξη της αιτήσεως αναιρέσεως, ο αναιρεσείων προβάλλει τους ακόλουθους λόγους:
 —
 Η ανωτέρα βία λόγω πολέμου διακόπτει την προθεσμία ασκήσεως προσφυγής. Τα γεγονότα που αντιμετώπιζε ο αναιρεσείων από τον Νοέμβριο του 2010 στην Ακτή του Ελεφαντοστού συνιστούν λόγο ανωτέρας βίας, κατά την έννοια του άρθρου 45 του Οργανισμού του Δικαστηρίου της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης, λόγω της εμπόλεμης καταστάσεως που διακόπτει τις προθεσμίες προσβολής των πράξεων που εξέδωσε κατ’ αυτού το Συμβούλιο.
 —
 Ο παρών λόγος ανωτέρας βίας λόγω πολέμου στερεί στον αναιρεσείοντα τη δυνατότητα να ασκήσει ελεύθερα τον δικαίωμα ασκήσεως προσφυγής κατά πράξεων που προσβάλλουν προδήλως τα θεμελιώδη δικαιώματά του.
 —
 Τα θεμελιώδη δικαιώματα και ελευθερίες υπερισχύουν της αρχής της ασφάλειας δικαίου. Επικαλούμενο την αρχή της ασφάλειας δικαίου για να κηρύξει απαράδεκτη την προσφυγή του αναιρεσείοντος, το Γενικό Δικαστήριο προσέβαλε το θεμελιώδες δικαίωμα της προσβάσεως στη δικαιοσύνη και τα δικαιώματα άμυνας. Ο αναιρεσείων στερήθηκε του δικαιώματος ακροάσεώς του από αρμόδιο δικαστήριο.
 —
 Μη αντιτάξιμο της προθεσμίας λόγω αποστάσεως και της προθεσμίας ασκήσεως προσφυγής σε περίπτωση πολέμου. Η προθεσμία λόγω αποστάσεως και η προθεσμία ασκήσεως προσφυγής δεν μπορούν να αντιταχθούν σε αποδέκτη που κατοικεί σε κράτος το οποίο βρίσκεται σε ανοικτό πόλεμο. Αυτές οι προθεσμίες ισχύουν μόνο για τις περιόδους ειρήνης και μόνο στην ευρωπαϊκή ήπειρο. Όμως, ο αναιρεσείων βρίσκεται σε άλλη ήπειρο και, ως εκ τούτου, η αυστηρή εφαρμογή του άρθρου 102 του Κανονισμού Διαδικασίας του Γενικού Δικαστηρίου στην προκειμένη περίπτωση συνιστά αναμφισβήτητα παράβαση του άρθρου 6, παράγραφος 1, της Ευρωπαϊκής Συμβάσεως για την προάσπιση των δικαιωμάτων του ανθρώπου και των θεμελιωδών ελευθεριών και του του άρθρου 263 της Συνθήκης για τη λειτουργία της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης.
 —
 Υπεροχή του άρθρου 263 της Συνθήκης για τη λειτουργία της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης. Το άρθρο 102 του Κανονισμού Διαδικασίας του Γενικού Δικαστηρίου καθιστά άνευ αντικειμένου κάθε υποχρέωση κοινοποιήσεως, όπως αυτή προβλέπεται από τη Συνθήκη για τη λειτουργία της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης, που προβλέπει ότι η προθεσμία ασκήσεως προσφυγής αρχίζει να τρέχει από την κοινοποίηση ή τη δημοσίευση ή από τον χρόνο κατά τον οποίο ο ενδιαφερόμενος έλαβε γνώση της πράξεως. Συγκεκριμένα, το άρθρο 102 του Κανονισμού Διαδικασίας παραβλέπει την υποχρέωση κοινοποιήσεως και δεν λαμβάνει υπόψη την ημέρα κατά την οποία ο αναιρεσείων έλαβε πράγματι γνώση της πράξεως, περιορίζοντας έτσι το γράμμα και το πνεύμα του άρθρου 263 ΣΛΕΕ. Ως εκ τούτου, το άρθρο 102 θέτει υπό αμφισβήτηση τα δικαιώματα που προβλέπονται και προστατεύονται από τη Συνθήκη, η οποία έχει υπέρτερη νομική αξία και επιβάλλεται στα όργανα τα οποία συγκροτούν την Ευρωπαϊκή Ένωση. Κατά συνέπεια, εφόσον οι προσβαλλόμενες πράξεις δεν κοινοποιήθηκαν στον αναιρεσείοντα, και τούτο κατά παράβαση του άρθρου 263, παράγραφος 5, της Συνθήκης για τη λειτουργία της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης, η προθεσμία ασκήσεως προσφυγής μπορούσε να αρχίσει μόνον από τον χρόνο κατά τον οποίο ο προσφεύγων έλαβε γνώση των κατ’ αυτού εκδοθεισών πράξεων.
 —
 Σοβαρή προσβολή των θεμελιωδών δικαιωμάτων και ελευθεριών. Η αρχή της ασφάλειας δικαίου, όπως διατυπώνεται από το Γενικό Δικαστήριο, θέτει σοβαρά υπό αμφισβήτηση την ασφάλεια δικαίου στο σύνολό της, καθόσον στους διοικουμένους που κατοικούν εκτός Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης και σε χώρα που βρίσκεται σε εμπόλεμη κατάσταση επιβάλλονται κυρώσεις κατά των οποίων αυτοί δεν μπορούν να ασκήσουν λυσιτελώς τα δικαιώματά τους προς άσκηση προσφυγής, δεδομένου ότι δεν έχουν λάβει γνώση της κυρώσεως.
 —
 Επικουρικώς, ο αναιρεσείων ζητεί την ακύρωση των πράξεων που εξέδωσε κατ’ αυτού το Συμβούλιο λόγω της σοβαρότητας της προσβολής των θεμελιωδών δικαιωμάτων και ελευθεριών. Εφόσον οι προσβαλλόμενες πράξεις προσβάλλουν θεμελιώδεις ελευθερίες προστατευόμενες από πλείονες διεθνείς συνθήκες, στο Δικαστήριο εναπόκειται να ακυρώσει τις εν λόγω πράξεις καθόσον ο παράνομος χαρακτήρας τους προσβάλλει την ευρωπαϊκή έννομη τάξη και με την αιτιολογία ότι καμία προθεσμία ασκήσεως προσφυγής δεν μπορεί να αντιταχθεί στον αναιρεσείοντα λόγω της σοβαρότητας της προσβολής των προστατευομένων θεμελιωδών ελευθεριών και δικαιωμάτων.