type: contracts

text:
 19.3.2009
 RO
 Jurnalul Oficial al Uniunii Europene
 L 73/35
 DECIZIA NR. 3/2009 A COMITETULUI MIXT AL SEE
 din 5 februarie 2009
 de modificare a anexei II (Reglementări tehnice, standarde, încercări și certificare) la Acordul SEE
 COMITETUL MIXT AL SEE,
 având în vedere Acordul privind Spațiul Economic European, astfel cum a fost modificat prin Protocolul de adaptare a Acordului privind Spațiul Economic European, denumit în continuare „acordul”, în special articolul 98,
 întrucât:
 (1)
 Anexa II la acord a fost modificată prin Decizia nr. 96/2008 a Comitetului mixt al SEE din 26 septembrie 2008 (1).
 (2)
 Directiva 2007/15/CE a Comisiei din 14 martie 2007 de modificare, în scopul adaptării sale la progresul tehnic, a anexei I la Directiva 74/483/CEE a Consiliului referitoare la proeminențele exterioare ale autovehiculelor (2) trebuie încorporată în acord,
 DECIDE:
 Articolul 1
 La capitolul I punctul 17 (Directiva 74/483/CEE a Consiliului) din anexa II la acord se adaugă următoarea liniuță:
 „—
 32007 L 0015: Directiva 2007/15/CE a Comisiei din 14 martie 2007 (JO L 75, 15.3.2007, p. 21).”
 Articolul 2
 Textele Directivei 2007/15/CE în limbile islandeză și norvegiană, care urmează să fie publicate în suplimentul SEE la Jurnalul Oficial al Uniunii Europene, sunt autentice.
 Articolul 3
 Prezenta decizie intră în vigoare la 6 februarie 2009, cu condiția să se fi efectuat toate notificările prevăzute la articolul 103 alineatul (1) din acord către Comitetul mixt al SEE (3).
 Articolul 4
 Prezenta decizie se publică în secțiunea SEE și în suplimentul SEE ale Jurnalului Oficial al Uniunii Europene.
 Adoptată la Bruxelles, 5 februarie 2009.
 Pentru Comitetul mixt al SEE
 Președintele
 Alan SEATTER
 (1) JO L 309, 20.11.2008, p. 15.
 (2) JO L 75, 15.3.2007, p. 21.
 (3) Nu au fost semnalate obligații constituționale.


type: wikipedia

text:
Magyarország távolsági autóbusz közlekedésében számos hazai autóbusz-társaság vesz részt. Közülük a legnagyobb hálózattal a Volánbusz rendelkezik; csak Budapestről napi 500 járatot indít. A vonalak nagy része Budapestről indul vagy oda érkezik.
 Járatok kategorizálása
 Helyközi járat: belföldön, települések között, helyközi díjszabás alapján közlekedő járatok (az elővárosi, regionális és országos járatok együttes elnevezése)
 Elővárosi járat: a főváros és a megyei jogú városok legfeljebb 70 km-es körébe tartozó településeket összekötő járatok
 Regionális járat: elővárosinak nem minősülő, megyén belül, vagy megyehatár átlépésével legfeljebb 100 km-t megtevő járatok
 Országos járat: se elővárosinak, se regionálisnak nem minősülő járatok
 Nemzetközi járat: magyar nagyvárosokat külföldi célállomásokkal összekötő járatok
 Autóbusz-pályaudvarok
 Budapest
 A fővárosban 7 autóbusz-pályaudvar szolgálja ki az elővárosi, regionális és országos autóbuszokat: a Népliget, a Stadion, az Árpád híd, a (Régen: Széna tér) Széll Kálmán tér, az Újpest-Városkapu, a Kelenföld és a Csepel autóbusz-állomás. Ezek közül csak a Népliget, Újpest-Városkapu és a Stadion fogad/indít regionális és országos autóbuszokat, a többi csak elővárosiakat.
 Népliget
 Ez Budapest legnagyobb és egyben legforgalmasabb autóbusz-pályaudvara. Ez az állomás látja el a Dél- és Nyugat-magyarországi régiókat, valamint a nemzetközi autóbuszok is innen indulnak illetve ide érkeznek. Az állomás két szintes:
 a metrószinten találhatóak a belföldi jegypénztárak, a mosdók, büfék valamint étel-, ital- és ATM automaták,
 míg az utcaszinten találhatóak az érkező és induló kocsiállások, a nemzetközi jegypénztárak, kisebb üzletek valamint a váróterem.
 28 kocsiállással rendelkezik.
 A jellegzetes, toronyházhoz hasonló kinézetű épületről könnyen fel lehet ismerni. Az Üllői út és a Könyves Kálmán körút kereszteződésénél található, a Népliget és a Fradi stadionja mellett. Az épület tetején található 2 darab óriás méretű digitális óra.
 Megközelíthető:
 Metró:
 Villamos:
 Autóbusz:
 Helyközi autóbusz:
 Stadion
 A Stadion állomás látja el a Kelet-magyarországi régiót. A létesítmény az utcaszinthez képest egy kicsivel alacsonyabban fekszik. Található itt többek között posta, büfék, újságos standok valamint étel-, ital- és ATM automaták.
 Az épület két részre van osztva: az induló járatok az épület fedett, míg az érkezőek az épület fedetlen részét használják.
 A Papp László Budapest Sportaréna és a Körcsarnok mellett, a Hungária körút - Kerepesi út találkozásánál található.
 Megközelíthető:
 Metró:
 Villamos:
 Autóbusz:
 Trolibusz:
 Helyközi autóbusz:
 Árpád híd
 Megközelíthető:
 Metró:
 Villamos:
 Autóbusz:
 Helyközi autóbusz:
 Újpest-Városkapu
 Megközelíthető:
 Metró:
 Autóbusz:
 Helyközi és távolsági autóbusz:
 Vasút:
 Széll Kálmán tér
 Megközelíthető:
 Metró:
 Villamos:
 Autóbusz:
 Helyközi autóbusz:
 Kelenföld
 Megközelíthető:
 Metró:
 Villamos:
 Autóbusz:
 Helyközi autóbusz:
 Vasút:
 Csepel
 Megközelíthető:
 HÉV:
 Autóbusz:
 Helyközi autóbusz:
 Megyeszékhelyek
 Az ország összes megyeszékhelyén található egy- vagy több olyan autóbusz-állomás, amely fogad/indít távolsági járatokat. Debrecen és Miskolc kivételével ezek mindegyike megközelíthető Budapestről. Ezek az állomások általában a helyi- és helyközi autóbuszok végállomása is egyben.
 Díjszabás
 Egy korábbi GKM (Gazdasági- és Közlekedési Minisztérium) határozat értelmében a vasúti- és a közúti személyszállítási díjaknak összhangban kell lenniük, éppen ezért a díjszabás megegyező.
 Úgynevezett elővételi automaták is találhatóak a nagyobb, főleg a budapesti pályaudvarokon. Ezekkel elkerülhető a pénztáraknál tapasztalható hosszas sorban állás.
 Leginkább a Budapestre/-ről közlekedő autóbuszokra jellemző a vasútnál előszeretettel használt ülőhely foglalási rendszer. Ennek lényege, hogyha az utas elővételben váltotta meg a menetjegyét, akkor a felszállásnál elsőbbsége van, így biztosítandó számára az ülőhely foglaltság. A forgalmasabb útvonalakon azonban még így is előfordul néha, hogy nem marad ülőhely.
 Az autóbuszokra mindig az azt üzemeltető autóbusz társaság pénztáraiban lehet menetjegyet váltani. Előfordul, hogy a járat közös üzemeltetésű vagy menetjegy csak az autóbusz vezetőnél kapható.
 Egy, a 2009-es év elején bevezetett új rendszer értelmében a Volánbusz által üzemeltettet vonalakon az utasok a járművezetőnél is megválthatják bérletjegyeiket, ha erre a környező a településeken nincsen mód.
 A távolsági autóbuszokon (a csomagtérben elhelyezett) az úti- és (az utastérben elhelyezett, legfeljebb 2 db, az utasok szabad közlekedését és kényelmét nem zavaró) a kézipoggyász(ok) szállítása díjtalan. Ha az útipoggyász az utazás során kárt szenved, úgy legfeljebb 50 000 Ft kártérítés igényelhető.
 Kritikák
 A helyközi buszpark elöregedett. A közszolgáltatásban üzemelő buszok átlagkora 10 éven felül van, illetve több száz elöregedett távolsági autóbuszt kéne fiatalabbakra cserélni a közlekedési vállalatoknak.
 A 2008 decemberében tartott több napos VDSzSz sztrájk miatt megbénult az ország vasúti közlekedése, így az utasoknak az autóbuszokat kellett igénybe venniük. Ebben az időszakban az összes társaság összes vonalán maximális volt a kapacitás és a telítettség. A legforgalmasabb viszonylatokban egyszerre akár 2-3 autóbusz is indult, de sok esetben még így sem fértek fel az utasok a járatokra. Ekkora forgalom az elmúlt időszakokban soha nem volt tapasztalható.
 Jegyzetek
 Külső hivatkozások
 Országos menetrendek
 Eurolines információk
 Magyarország közúti közlekedése


text:
2002. aasta Austria parlamendivalimised olid Nationalrati (Austria parlamendi) valimised pühapäeval, 24. novembril 2002. Valimised toimusid enneaegselt, eelmised valimised olid toimunud 1999. aastal.
 Eellugu
 7. septembril 2002 toimus Knittelfeldi linnas Austria Rahvapartei koosolek, mis kutsuti kokku sama aasta suvel parteis tihenenud pingete tõttu. Enamik kohaletulnutest esindas parteisisest opositsiooni, teiste hulgas polnud koosolekul partei esimeest. Koosoleku järel lahkus mitu liiget parteist ning tühistati koalitsioonileping. See tingis uute valimiste väljakuulutamise.
 Tulemused
 Valimiste tulemusena säilitasid Austria Rahvapartei ja Austria Vabadusepartei koalitsioon võimu, kaotades 7 mandaati. Rahvapartei parandas tulemust, tõustes kolmandalt kohalt valimiste võitjaks. Rahvapartei on tavaliselt sõjajärgses Austrias olnud tugevuselt esimese kahe partei hulgas ja saavutas oma parima tulemuse pärast 1966. aastat. 2/3 võrra vähenes neofašistliku Austria Vabadusepartei valijaskond. Rohelised saavutasid oma läbi aegade parima tulemuse.
 Austria valimised
 Parlamendivalimised, Austria 2002. aasta
 Parlamendivalimised


type: other

text:
- Norra Reals Elevkår
 2011-04-04 20:51:59
 Styrelsemöte 4/4
 2011-04-04 11/12
 Närvarande ur styrelsen: Freja Nielsen, Sanna Sättare, Fritz Lennaard, Linnea Axelsson, Marilyn Nguema, Navid Ghaffarpour, Pepule Brodrej, Theresa Karlsson, Christoffer Arnlund, Alexander Ljungquist, Henrik Stjernberg.
 Frånvarande ur styrelsen: Inga.
 Allmänt bra stämning i styrelsen, framför allt väldig glädje över att detta var det första mötet med
 §6. Studentkatalog
 Norra Real ska skriva en text till den gemensamma studentkatalogen för Stockholms fyra stora läroverk. August Almqvist Jansson ska tillfrågas om han är villig att skriva en text som publiceras i katalogen. Pepule kontaktar August.
 §7. Onsdag 6/4 – Torsdag 7/4
 Onsdag från klockan 13:00 är det styrelseträff för planering av främst Läroverksfejden men även annat som behöver planeras och struktureras. Torsdag från klockan 13:00 är det träff för styrelsen för ommöblering av kårrummet.
 §8. Öppet möte
 Öppet möte hålls på andra våningen på onsdag 6/4 klockan 09:35. Medlemmar i kåren är varmt välkomna att komma med idéer och åsikter. Styrelsen bjuder på godis!
 Alexander och Theresa medtar postitlappar. Styrelsen tog beslut om
 att 200 kr ska brukas för att köpa godis.
 §9. Läroverksfejden
 Intern planering inför den deltävling som hålls på Norra Real pågår inom styrelsen.
 Onsdag 6/4 ska styrelsen från 13:00 planera det sista inför fejden.
 §10. Månadsplanering
 En månadsplanering för elevkårens aktiviteter planera komma upp i skolan. Linnea ser över detta.
 §11. Rektorsmöte
 Den 13/5 klockan 14:00 är det möte med styrelsen och rektor Ove Sköld. Mötet hålls för att samtala om den gångna terminen och även för att bestämma innehåll på de USB-minnen de nya eleverna ska få i början av höstterminen.
 §.12 Företag
 Många företag kontaktar styrelsen och skolledning för att komma till skolan och föreläsa. En frågeställning om hur elevkårens medlemmar ställer sig till föreläsande och informerande företag under det öppna mötet 6/4. Föreläsning från Nanny.nu kommer ställas in då det inte finns tid för besök av företaget.
 §13. Enkäter
 De nya föreningsblanketterna är klara och likaså enkäterna för pengar som ska återbetalas av elevkåren. Christoffer utformar en påverkansblankett som ännu inte är klar.
 §14. Lundresa
 Resan till Lund som tre personer i styrelsen och även en medlem i elevkåren ska genomföra vecka 15 planeras. Resan innefattar information om Operation Dagsverke och även en träff med Dalai Lama.
 att 2520 kr beviljas att användas för rese- och boendekostnader till resan.
 §11. Övriga punkter
 Aulabokning för onsdagsförmiddagar checkades av med Linnea som är ansvarig för detta.
 Matris för påverkan som Christoffer arbetar på ska ut till så många lärare som möjligt för feedback. En veckofråga är också aktuellt i matrisen, alltså en ny fråga varje vecka som då ska behandlas av lärare, skolledning och elever. Dessa frågor ska sedan tas upp och diskuteras på AE-mötena. Matrisen ska även som färdig vara tillgänglig för lärare, skolledning och elever.
 §12. Mötets avslutande
 Styrelsemöte 14/11
 Styrelsemöte 15/8
 Styrelsemöte 30/5
 Styrelsemöte 2/5
 Styrelsemöte 15/4
 Styrelsemöte 11/4
 Styrelsemöte 28/3
 Styrelsemöte 21/3
 Styrelsemöte 14/3
 Styrelsemöte 9/3
 Styrelsemöte 7/3
 Styrelsemöte 23/2


type: legislation

jurisdiction: EU

text:
 3.2.2017
 RO
 Jurnalul Oficial al Uniunii Europene
 L 29/16
 REGULAMENTUL DE PUNERE ÎN APLICARE (UE) 2017/183 AL COMISIEI
 din 27 ianuarie 2017
 privind clasificarea anumitor mărfuri în Nomenclatura combinată
 COMISIA EUROPEANĂ,
 având în vedere Tratatul privind funcționarea Uniunii Europene,
 având în vedere Regulamentul (UE) nr. 952/2013 al Parlamentului European și al Consiliului din 9 octombrie 2013 de stabilire a Codului vamal al Uniunii (1), în special articolul 57 alineatul (4) și articolul 58 alineatul (2),
 întrucât:
 (1)
 Pentru a asigura aplicarea uniformă a Nomenclaturii combinate anexate la Regulamentul (CEE) nr. 2658/87 al Consiliului (2), este necesar să se adopte măsuri privind clasificarea mărfurilor menționate în anexa la prezentul regulament.
 (2)
 Regulamentul (CEE) nr. 2658/87 stabilește regulile generale pentru interpretarea Nomenclaturii combinate. Aceste reguli se aplică, de asemenea, oricăror alte nomenclatoare bazate integral sau parțial pe aceasta sau care îi adaugă acesteia subdiviziuni suplimentare și care sunt stabilite prin dispoziții specifice ale Uniunii, în vederea aplicării de măsuri tarifare sau de altă natură privind comerțul cu mărfuri.
 (3)
 În temeiul acestor reguli generale, mărfurile descrise în coloana 1 a tabelului din anexă trebuie clasificate la codul NC indicat în coloana 2, pe baza motivelor care figurează în coloana 3 a tabelului menționat.
 (4)
 Este necesar să se prevadă posibilitatea invocării în continuare de către titular, pentru o anumită perioadă de timp, în conformitate cu articolul 34 alineatul (9) din Regulamentul (UE) nr. 952/2013, a informațiilor tarifare obligatorii care sunt emise în legătură cu mărfurile vizate de prezentul regulament, dar care nu sunt conforme cu acesta. Perioada respectivă ar trebui să fie de trei luni.
 (5)
 Măsurile prevăzute în prezentul regulament sunt conforme cu avizul Comitetului Codului vamal,
 ADOPTĂ PREZENTUL REGULAMENT:
 Articolul 1
 Mărfurile descrise în coloana 1 a tabelului din anexă se clasifică în Nomenclatura combinată la codul NC indicat în coloana 2 a tabelului menționat.
 Articolul 2
 Informațiile tarifare obligatorii care nu sunt conforme cu prezentul regulament pot fi invocate în continuare, în conformitate cu articolul 34 alineatul (9) din Regulamentul (UE) nr. 952/2013, timp de trei luni de la data intrării în vigoare a prezentului regulament.
 Articolul 3
 Prezentul regulament intră în vigoare în a douăzecea zi de la data publicării în Jurnalul Oficial al Uniunii Europene.
 Prezentul regulament este obligatoriu în toate elementele sale și se aplică direct în toate statele membre.
 Adoptat la Bruxelles, 27 ianuarie 2017.
 Pentru Comisie,
 pentru președinte
 Stephen QUEST
 Director general
 Direcția Generală Impozitare și Uniune Vamală
 (1) JO L 269, 10.10.2013, p. 1.
 (2) Regulamentul (CEE) nr. 2658/87 al Consiliului din 23 iulie 1987 privind Nomenclatura tarifară și statistică și Tariful vamal comun (JO L 256, 7.9.1987, p. 1).
 ANEXĂ
 Descrierea mărfurilor
 Clasificare (Cod NC)
 Motive
 (1)
 (2)
 (3)
 Un articol (așa-numit „covor-puzzle de tip tatami”) fabricat din EVA (etilen-vinil-acetat) sub formă de bucăți cu suprafața nealunecoasă, de 100 × 100 cm, și cu o grosime de aproximativ 3 cm. Bucățile au un sistem de îmbinare bazat pe principiul jocurilor puzzle și sunt fixate ferm pe o altă suprafață, formând astfel un covor.
 Prin structura celulară a covorului, articolul este conceput pentru a absorbi șocurile generate în cursul diferitelor activități sportive (de exemplu, yoga, gimnastică sau arte marțiale) și a proteja corpul. „Covorul-puzzle de tip tatami” este, de asemenea, conceput ca un izolator de zgomot, căldură și umiditate. Acesta servește, astfel, ca mijloc de protecție împotriva deteriorării suprafeței aflate sub el și pentru a proteja persoanele care desfășoară diferite alte activități, de exemplu, atunci când este utilizat în creșe sau de către artiști.
 A se vedea imaginea (*1).
 3918 90 00
 Clasificarea se stabilește pe baza regulilor generale 1 și 6 de interpretare a Nomenclaturii combinate, precum și pe baza textului de la codurile NC 3918 și 3918 90 00 .
 Este exclusă clasificarea la poziția 9506 ca articole și echipamente pentru cultură fizică generală, gimnastică, atletism, alte sporturi sau jocuri în aer liber, întrucât învelitoarea din materiale plastice pentru podele neasamblată este destinată nu numai pentru sport, ci și pentru protecția suprafețelor și a persoanelor care desfășoară alte activități.
 În consecință, articolul trebuie clasificat în funcție de materialul său component (materiale plastice).
 Prin urmare, acesta trebuie clasificat ca învelitori din materiale plastice pentru podele la codul NC 3918 90 00 .
 (*1) Imaginea are un caracter pur informativ.


text:
 10.9.2013
 SK
 Úradný vestník Európskej únie
 L 241/1
 VYKONÁVACIE NARIADENIE KOMISIE (EÚ) č. 865/2013
 z 9. septembra 2013,
 ktorým sa mení a dopĺňa nariadenie (ES) č. 1010/2009, pokiaľ ide o administratívne dohody s tretími krajinami týkajúce sa osvedčení o úlovku produktov morského rybolovu
 EURÓPSKA KOMISIA,
 so zreteľom na Zmluvu o fungovaní Európskej únie,
 so zreteľom na nariadenie Rady (ES) č. 1005/2008 (1) z 29. septembra 2008, ktorým sa ustanovuje systém Spoločenstva na zabraňovanie nezákonnému, nenahlásenému a neregulovanému rybolovu, na odrádzanie od neho a jeho odstránenie, a najmä na jeho článok 12 ods. 4, článok 14 ods. 3, článok 20 ods. 4 a článok 52,
 keďže:
 (1)
 Administratívne dohody s tretími krajinami týkajúce sa osvedčení o úlovku produktov rybolovu sa uvádzajú v prílohe IX k nariadeniu (ES) č. 1010/2009 z 22. októbra 2009, ktorým sa ustanovujú podrobné pravidlá vykonávania nariadenia Rady (ES) č. 1005/2008 (2). Predmetom týchto dohôd sú aj vzory osvedčení o úlovkoch potvrdené príslušnými orgánmi príslušných tretích krajín.
 (2)
 Orgány Nového Zélandu zmenili vzor novozélanského osvedčenia o úlovku.
 (3)
 Príloha IX k nariadeniu (ES) č. 1010/2009 by sa preto mala zodpovedajúcim spôsobom zmeniť.
 (4)
 Opatrenia stanovené v tomto nariadení sú v súlade so stanoviskom Výboru pre rybolov a akvakultúru,
 PRIJALA TOTO NARIADENIE:
 Článok 1
 Príloha IX k nariadeniu (ES) č. 1010/2009 sa mení v zmysle prílohy k tomuto nariadeniu.
 Článok 2
 Nadobudnutie účinnosti
 Toto nariadenie nadobúda účinnosť siedmym dňom po jeho uverejnení v Úradnom vestníku Európskej únie.
 Toto nariadenie je záväzné v celom rozsahu a priamo uplatniteľné vo všetkých členských štátoch.
 V Bruseli 9. septembra 2013
 Za Komisiu
 predseda
 José Manuel BARROSO
 (1) Ú. v. EÚ L 286, 29.10.2008, s. 1.
 (2) Ú. v. EÚ L 280, 27.10.2009, s. 5.
 PRÍLOHA
 V oddiele 3 (Nový Zéland) prílohy IX k nariadeniu (ES) č. 1010/2009 sa dodatok 1 nahrádza takto:


text:
 11.2.2014
 FR
 Journal officiel de l'Union européenne
 L 40/1
 DÉCISION 2014/71/PESC DU CONSEIL
 du 18 novembre 2013
 relative à la signature et à la conclusion de l’accord entre l’Union européenne et la République du Chili établissant un cadre pour la participation de la République du Chili aux opérations de gestion de crise menées par l’Union européenne
 LE CONSEIL DE L’UNION EUROPÉENNE,
 vu le traité sur l’Union européenne, et notamment son article 37, en liaison avec l’article 218, paragraphes 5 et 6, du traité sur le fonctionnement de l’Union européenne.
 vu la proposition du haut représentant de l’Union pour les affaires étrangères et la politique de sécurité,
 considérant ce qui suit:
 (1)
 Les conditions relatives à la participation d’États tiers aux opérations de gestion de crise menées par l’Union européenne ne devraient pas être définies cas par cas pour chaque opération concernée, mais fixées dans un accord établissant le cadre d’une telle participation future éventuelle.
 (2)
 À la suite de l’adoption par le Conseil, le 26 avril 2010, d’une décision autorisant l’ouverture de négociations, le haut représentant de l’Union pour les affaires étrangères et la politique de sécurité a négocié un accord entre l’Union européenne et la République du Chili établissant un cadre pour la participation de la République du Chili aux opérations de gestion de crise menées par l’Union européenne (ci-après dénommé «accord»).
 (3)
 Il convient d’approuver l’accord,
 A ADOPTÉ LA PRÉSENTE DÉCISION:
 Article premier
 L’accord entre l’Union européenne et la République du Chili établissant un cadre pour la participation de la République du Chili aux opérations de gestion de crise menées par l’Union européenne est approuvé au nom de l’Union.
 Le texte de l’accord est joint à la présente décision.
 Article 2
 Le président du Conseil est autorisé à désigner la ou les personnes habilitées à signer l’accord à l’effet d’engager l’Union.
 Article 3
 Le président du Conseil procède, au nom de l’Union, à la notification prévue à l’article 16, paragraphe 1, de l’accord (1).
 Article 4
 La présente décision entre en vigueur le jour de son adoption.
 Fait à Bruxelles, le 18 novembre 2013.
 Par le Conseil
 Le président
 C. ASHTON
 (1) La date d’entrée en vigueur de l’accord sera publiée au Journal officiel de l’Union européenne par les soins du secrétariat général du Conseil.


text:
 21.6.2012
 EL
 Επίσημη Εφημερίδα της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης
 L 161/16
 ΑΠΌΦΑΣΗ ΤΗΣ ΜΕΙΚΤΉΣ ΕΠΙΤΡΟΠΉΣ ΤΟΥ ΕΟΧ
 αριθ. 10/2012
 της 10ης Φεβρουαρίου 2012
 για την τροποποίηση του παραρτήματος II (Τεχνικοί κανόνες, πρότυπα, δοκιμές και πιστοποίηση) της συμφωνίας για τον ΕΟΧ
 Η ΜΕΙΚΤΗ ΕΠΙΤΡΟΠΗ ΤΟΥ ΕΟΧ,
 Έχοντας υπόψη τη συμφωνία για τον Ευρωπαϊκό Οικονομικό Χώρο, όπως τροποποιήθηκε με το πρωτόκολλο προσαρμογής της συμφωνίας για τον Ευρωπαϊκό Οικονομικό Χώρο, εφεξής «η συμφωνία», και ιδίως το άρθρο 98,
 Εκτιμώντας τα ακόλουθα:
 (1)
 Το παράρτημα II της συμφωνίας τροποποιήθηκε με την απόφαση αριθ. 72/2011της Μεικτής Επιτροπής του ΕΟΧ της 1ης Ιουλίου 2011 (1).
 (2)
 Ο κανονισμός (ΕΕ) αριθ. 301/2011 της Επιτροπής, της 28ης Μαρτίου 2011, για τροποποίηση του κανονισμού (ΕΚ) αριθ. 297/95 του Συμβουλίου όσον αφορά την αναπροσαρμογή των τελών του Ευρωπαϊκού Οργανισμού Φαρμάκων με βάση τον δείκτη πληθωρισμού (2) πρέπει να ενσωματωθεί στη συμφωνία.
 (3)
 Η απόφαση 2008/911/ΕΚ της Επιτροπής, της 21ης Νοεμβρίου 2008, για την κατάρτιση καταλόγου φυτικών ουσιών και παρασκευασμάτων και των συνδυασμών τους για χρήση σε παραδοσιακά βοτανοθεραπευτικά φάρμακα (3) πρέπει να ενσωματωθεί στη συμφωνία.
 (4)
 Η απόφαση 2010/28/ΕΚ της Επιτροπής, της 28ης Ιουλίου 2009, σχετικά με την τροποποίηση του καταλόγου των βοτανοθεραπευτικών ουσιών, παρασκευασμάτων και των συνδυασμών τους για χρήση σε παραδοσιακά βοτανοθεραπευτικά φάρμακα (4) πρέπει να ενσωματωθεί στη συμφωνία.
 (5)
 Η απόφαση 2010/30/ΕΕ της Επιτροπής, της 9ης Δεκεμβρίου 2009, για την τροποποίηση του καταλόγου φυτικών δρογών, παρασκευασμάτων φυτικών δρογών και συνδυασμών τους για χρήση σε παραδοσιακά φαρμακευτικά προϊόντα φυτικής προέλευσης (5) πρέπει να ενσωματωθεί στη συμφωνία.
 (6)
 Η απόφαση 2010/180/ΕΕ της Επιτροπής, της 25ης Μαρτίου 2010, σχετικά με την τροποποίηση της απόφασης 2008/911/ΕΚ για την κατάρτιση καταλόγου φυτικών ουσιών και παρασκευασμάτων και των συνδυασμών τους για χρήση σε παραδοσιακά βοτανοθεραπευτικά φάρμακα (6) πρέπει να ενσωματωθεί στη συμφωνία,
 ΕΞΕΔΩΣΕ ΤΗΝ ΠΑΡΟΥΣΑ ΑΠΟΦΑΣΗ:
 Άρθρο 1
 Το κεφάλαιο XIII του παραρτήματος II της συμφωνίας τροποποιείται ως εξής:
 1.
 Στο σημείο 15η [κανονισμός (ΕΚ) αριθ. 297/95 του Συμβουλίου] προστίθεται η ακόλουθη περίπτωση:
 «—
 32011 R 0301: κανονισμός (ΕΕ) αριθ. 301/2011 της Επιτροπής, της 28ης Μαρτίου 2011 (ΕΕ L 81 της 29.3.2011, σ. 5).».
 2.
 Μετά το σημείο 15μστ (οδηγία 2009/135/ΕΚ της Επιτροπής) προστίθεται το ακόλουθο σημείο:
 «15νστ.
 32008 D 0911: απόφαση 2008/911/ΕΚ της Επιτροπής, της 21ης Νοεμβρίου 2008, για την κατάρτιση καταλόγου φυτικών ουσιών και παρασκευασμάτων και των συνδυασμών τους για χρήση σε παραδοσιακά βοτανοθεραπευτικά φάρμακα (ΕΕ L 328 της 6.12.2008, σ. 42), όπως τροποποιήθηκε με:
 —
 32010 D 0028: απόφαση 2010/28/ΕΚ της Επιτροπής, της 28ης Ιουλίου 2009 (ΕΕ L 11 της 16.1.2010, σ. 12),
 —
 32010 D 0030: απόφαση 2010/30/ΕΕ της Επιτροπής, της 9ης Δεκεμβρίου 2009 (ΕΕ L 12 της 19.1.2010, σ. 14),
 —
 32010 D 0180: απόφαση 2010/180/ΕΕ της Επιτροπής, της 25ης Μαρτίου 2010 (ΕΕ L 80 της 26.3.2010, σ. 52).».
 Άρθρο 2
 Τα κείμενα του κανονισμού (ΕΕ) αριθ. 301/2011 και των αποφάσεων 2008/911/ΕΚ, 2010/28/ΕΚ, 2010/30/ΕΕ και 2010/180/ΕΕ στην ισλανδική και στη νορβηγική γλώσσα, τα οποία δημοσιεύονται στο συμπλήρωμα ΕΟΧ της Επίσημης Εφημερίδας της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης, είναι αυθεντικά.
 Άρθρο 3
 Η παρούσα απόφαση αρχίζει να ισχύει στις 11 Φεβρουαρίου 2012, υπό την προϋπόθεση ότι έχουν πραγματοποιηθεί προς τη Μεικτή Επιτροπή του ΕΟΧ όλες οι κοινοποιήσεις που προβλέπονται στο άρθρο 103 παράγραφος 1 της συμφωνίας (7).
 Άρθρο 4
 Η παρούσα απόφαση δημοσιεύεται στο τμήμα ΕΟΧ και στο συμπλήρωμα ΕΟΧ της Επίσημης Εφημερίδας της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης.
 Βρυξέλλες, 10 Φεβρουαρίου 2012.
 Για τη Μεικτή Επιτροπή του ΕΟΧ
 Ο εκτελών καθήκοντα Προέδρου
 Gianluca GRIPPA
 (1) ΕΕ L 262 της 6.10.2011, σ. 28.
 (2) ΕΕ L 81 της 29.3.2011, σ. 5.
 (3) ΕΕ L 328 της 6.12.2008, σ. 42.
 (4) ΕΕ L 11 της 16.1.2010, σ. 12.
 (5) ΕΕ L 12 της 19.1.2010, σ. 14.
 (6) ΕΕ L 80 της 26.3.2010, σ. 52.
 (7) Δεν έχουν αναφερθεί συνταγματικές απαιτήσεις.


text:
Marlene Mizzi (twieldet fl-24 ta' Diċembru 1954) kienet politiku Maltija u Membru tal-Parlament Ewropew. Hija membru tal-Partit Laburista. Meta kienet membru tal-Parlament Ewropew hija kienet tagħmel parti mal-Alleanza Progressiva tas-Soċjalisti u d-Demokratiċi.
 Sfond
 Mizzi hija bint John Cacciottolo u Josephine Micallef u hija miżżewġa lill-imħallef Antonio Mizzi. Għandhom tifla waħda, Alexandra, li hija wkoll avukata. Mizzi ggradwat b'lawrija bl-unuri fl-ekonomija fl-1976, u ssoktat l-istudji tagħha fil-Maastricht School of Management, fejn kisbet Masters tal-Filosofija bi speċjalizzazzjoni fit-tmexxija korporattiva. Mizzi serviet bħala l-President tas-Sea Malta mill-1996 sal-2005.
 Karriera politika
 Fl-24 ta ’April 2013, Mizzi ġiet eletta bħala l-ewwel mara Maltija Membru tal-Parlament Ewropew, f'elezzjoni każwali, minflok Edward Scicluna.
 Matul l-ewwel sena tagħha fil-Parlament Ewropew, serviet bħala Viċi President tal-Kumitat għall-Affarijiet Ekonomiċi u Monetarji (ECON), taħt it-tmexxija tal-President Sharon Bowles. Wara l-elezzjonijiet Ewropej tal-2014, Mizzi saret Viċi President tal-Kumitat għall-Petizzjonijiet (PETI) u membru tal-Kumitat għas-Suq Intern u l-Ħarsien tal-Konsumatur (IMCO). Fl-2016, hija nħatret bħala r-rapporteur tal-Parlament Ewropew dwar l-istandardizzazzjoni.
 Mizzi kienet proponent qawwi għad-drittijiet tan-nisa. Fl-2016 hija organizzat diskussjoni dwar id-drittijiet tan-nisa fl-Ambaxxata Amerikana f'Malta. Hija ospitat konferenza dwar l-intraprenditorija tan-nisa fil-Parlament Ewropew fi Brussell. L-għan tal-konferenza kien li tippromwovi l-intraprenditorija inklussiva tan-nisa u tipprovdi ambjent intraprenditorjali aħjar għan-nisa. Minbarra l-kompiti tal-kumitat tagħha, Mizzi serviet bħala membru tad-delegazzjoni tal-Parlament Ewropew għall-Assemblea Parlamentari tal-Mediterran mill-2013. Kienet ukoll Membru tal-Parlament Ewropew fl-Intergrupp dwar il-Benesseri u l-Konservazzjoni tal-Annimali.
 Hija ma kkontestatx l-elezzjoni tal-2019 biex iżżomm is-siġġu ta' MPE tagħha.
 Referenzi
 Twieldu fl-1954
 Politiċi Maltin
 Politiċi tal-Partit Laburista (Malta)


text:
 Avis juridique important
 |
 21995A1230(05)
 Tilläggsprotokoll till Europaavtalet om upprättandet av en associering mellan Europeiska gemenskaperna och deras medlemsstater å ena sidan och Rumänien å andra sidan
 Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning nr L 317 , 30/12/1995 s. 0040 - 0043
 TILLÄGGSPROTOKOLL till Europaavtalet om upprättandet av en associering mellan Europeiska gemenskaperna och deras medlemsstater å ena sidan och Rumänien å andra sidan EUROPEISKA GEMENSKAPEN OCH EUROPEISKA ATOMENERGIGEMENSKAPEN, nedan kallade "gemenskapen",å ena sidan ochRUMÄNIEN,å andra sidan,HAR FATTAT DETTA BESLUTmed beaktande av följande:Europaavtalet om upprättandet av en associering mellan Europeiska gemenskaperna och deras medlemsstater å ena sidan och Rumänien å andra sidan (nedan kallat "Europaavtalet") undertecknades i Bryssel den 1 februari 1993.Målen för Europaavtalet vilka anges i artikel 1 i detta, omfattar en bestämmelse om en lämplig ram för Rumäniens gradvisa integrering i gemenskapen.Gemenskapen och Rumänien har i avdelningarna VI och VII i Europaavtalet kommit överens om att främja ekonomiskt och kulturellt samarbete.Europeiska rådet välkomnade vid sitt möte i Köpenhamn den 21 och 22 juni 1993 den möjlighet som givits de associerade länderna att delta i gemenskapsprogram i enlighet med Europaavtalen.I ordförandeskapets slutsatser från Europeiska rådets möte i Köpenhamn den 21 och 22 juni 1993 fastslås att det framtida samarbetet med de associerade länderna skall inriktas på medlemskap, vilket nu har fastställts som mål, och att ett sådant samarbete skall omfatta de associerade ländernas medverkan i gemenskapsprogram i integrationssyfte.PARTERNA HAR BESLUTAT att upprätta detta protokoll och har för detta ändamål som befullmäktigade utsettEUROPEISKA GEMENSKAPEN:Pierre de BOISSIEUAmbassadörFranska republikens ständiga företrädareOrdförande i Ständiga företrädarnas kommittéEUROPEISKA ATOMENERGIGEMENSKAPEN:Günther BURGHARDTGeneraldirektör vid Europeiska gemenskapernas kommissions generaldirektorat för utrikespolitiska förbindelserRUMÄNIEN:Constantin ENEAmbassadörChef för representation vid Europeiska unionenParterna har utväxlat sina fullmakter och funnit dem vara vederbörligen utformade.HÄRIGENOM FÖRESKRIVS FÖLJANDE.Artikel 1 Rumänien får delta i gemenskapens ramprogram, särskilda program, projekt eller andra åtgärder inom följande områden:- Forskning och teknisk utveckling.- Informationstjänster.- Miljö.- Utbildning, yrkespraktik och ungdomsfrågor.- Socialpolitik och hälsofrågor.- Konsumentskydd.- Små och medelstora företag.- Turism.- Kultur.- Den audiovisuella sektorn.- Räddningstjänst.- Handelslättnader.- Energi.- Transport.- Bekämpning av droger och drogberoende.Parterna får komma överens om att lägga till andra områden inom gemenskapens verksamhet till dem som anges ovan när det anses vara av gemensamt intresse eller kunna bidra till förverkligandet av Europaavtalets mål.Artikel 2 Utan att det påverkar Rumäniens redan pågående medverkan i de verksamheter som anges i artikel 1, skall det associeringsråd som inrättades genom Europaavtalet bestämma villkoren för Rumäniens medverkan i de verksamheter som anges i artikel 1.Artikel 3 Rumäniens finansiella bidrag till de verksamheter som anges i artikel 1 skall grundas på principen att Rumänien skall täcka de kostnader som uppstår i samband med dess deltagande.Om det är nödvändigt får gemenskapen från fall till fall och i enlighet med de bestämmelser som gäller för Europeiska gemenskapernas allmänna budget besluta att betala ett tillägg till Rumäniens bidrag.Parterna får komma överens om att de relevanta bestämmelserna i avdelning VIII i Europaavtalet om finansiellt samarbete skall tillämpas.Artikel 4 Detta protokoll träder i kraft den första dagen i den andra månaden efter den dag då parterna underrättar varandra om att de nödvändiga förfarandena för detta avslutats.Artikel 5 Detta protokoll skall betraktas som ett tillägg till Europaavtalet mellan gemenskapen och Rumänien. Alla allmänna, institutionella och avslutande bestämmelser skall tillämpas i enlighet härmed från och med detta protokolls ikraftträdande.Artikel 6 Detta protokoll skall upprättas i kopior på danska, engelska, finska, franska, grekiska, italienska, nederländska, portugisiska, spanska, svenska, tyska och bulgariska, vilka samtliga texter är lika giltiga.Hecho en Bruselas, el treinta de junio de mil novecientos noventa y cinco.Udfærdiget i Bruxelles den tredivte juni nitten hundrede og femoghalvfems.Geschehen zu Brüssel am dreißigsten Juni neunzehnhundertfünfundneunzig. ̧ãéíå óôéò ÂñõîÝëëåò, óôéò ôñéÜíôá Éïõíßïõ ÷ßëéá åííéáêüóéá åíåíÞíôá ðÝíôå.Done at Brussels on the thirtieth day of June in the year one thousand nine hundred and ninety-five.Fait à Bruxelles, le trente juin mil neuf cent quatre-vingt-quinze.Fatto a Bruxelles, addì trenta giugno millenovecentonovantacinque.Gedaan te Brussel, de dertigste juni negentienhonderd vijfennegentig.Feito em Bruxelas, em trinta de Junho de mil novecentos e noventa e cinco.Tehty Brysselissä kolmantenakymmenentenä päivänä kesäkuuta vuonna tuhatyhdeksänsataayhdeksänkymmentäviisi.Utfärdat i Bryssel den trettionde juni nittonhundranittiofem.F Facut la Bruxelles la treizeci iunie una mie nou Fa sute nou Fazeci Ksi cinci.Por la Comunidad EuropeaFor Det Europæiske FællesskabFür die Europäische GemeinschaftÃéá ôçí ÅõñùðáúêÞ ÊïéíüôçôáFor the European CommunityPour la Communauté européennePer la Comunità europeaVoor de Europese GemeenschapPela Comunidade EuropeiaEuroopan yhteisön puolestaPå Europeiska gemenskapens vägnar>Hänvisning till film>Por la Comunidad Europea de la Energía AtómicaFor Det Europæiske AtomenergifællesskabFür die Europäische AtomgemeinschaftÃéá ôçí ÅõñùðáúêÞ Êïéíüôçôá ÁôïìéêÞò ÅíåñãåßáòFor the European Atomic Energy CommunityPour la Communauté européenne de l'énergie atomiquePer la Comunità europea dell'energia atomicaVoor de Europese Gemeenschap voor AtoomenergiePela Comunidade Europeia da Energia AtómicaEuroopan atomienergiayhteisön puolestaPå Europeiska atomenergigemenskapens vägnar>Hänvisning till film>Pentru Guvernul Romaniei>Hänvisning till film>


text:
Aleksandras I Didysis ( arba Aleksandras III Makedonietis 356 m. pr. m. e. liepos 21 d. Pela – 323 m. pr. m. e. birželio 10 d. Babilonas) – Makedonijos karalius (336–323 m. pr. m. e.).
 Po daugybės Senovės Graikijos miestų-valstybių suvienijimo valdant jo tėvui Pilypui II (tai Aleksandrui teko pakartoti po to, kai po Pilypo II mirties pietinė Graikija sukilo), Aleksandras išplėtė savo tėvo sukurtą karalystę užkariaudamas Persiją, įskaitant Anatoliją, Siriją, Finikiją, Egiptą, Baktriją, Mesopotomiją. Rytuose imperijos sienos siekė Pendžabą. Aleksandras į savo armiją ir administraciją įtraukė ir negraikus bei nemakedoniečius, o tai kai kurie mokslininkai traktuoja kaip bandymą „sulydyti“ margos imperijos gyventojus. Jis skatino armijos ir užkariautų šalių gyventojų vedybas ir pats tai praktikavo. Po dvylikos metų nuolatinių karinių veiksmų Aleksandras mirė, greičiausiai nuo maliarijos arba virusinio encefalito.
 Aleksandro Makedoniečio gyvenimas
 Ankstyvasis laikotarpis
 Aleksandras buvo Makedonijos karaliaus Pilypo II ir Epyro princesės Olimpijos, trečiosios Pilypo II žmonos, sūnus. Pagal motinos liniją jis buvo Epyro karaliaus Aleksandro sūnėnas. Epyras buvo teritorija, apėmusi šiuolaikinį Graikijos Epyro regioną ir pietinę Albaniją. Pats Aleksandras kildino save iš Achilo.
 Aleksandro ankstyvosios biografijos detalės, ypač iš vaikystės, vėliau tapo legenda. Taip Plutarchas pasakoja, kad Aleksandro tikrasis tėvas buvęs Dzeusas; taip pat pasakota, kad Olimpiją ir Pilypą lankė sapnai, kuriuos sapnų aiškintojas Atistanderis interpretavo kaip pranašystę, jog jiems gims liūtas. Olimpijos motina kildinta tiesiogiai iš Achilo. Pagal Plutarcho pasakojimą (greičiausiai taip pat legendą) vaikystėje Aleksandras sutramdęs savo žirgą Bucefalą, su kuriuo vėliau keliavo iki pat Indijos, nors niekas be jo šio žirgo sutramdyti negalėjo.
 Be šių legendų, apie Aleksandro vaikystę yra mažai kas žinoma. 343–340 m. Aleksandro mokytojas buvo Aristotelis. Tuometinė Makedonija buvo valstybė į šiaurę nuo klasikinės Graikijos. 340 metais tėvui kariaujant su Bizantija, Aleksandras numalšino sukilimą Trakijoje, karvedžio talentas išryškėjo 338 metais Chaironėjos mūšyje. 336 m. pr. m. e., būdamas dvidešimties metų, Aleksandras tapo Makedonijos karaliumi.
 Mažosios Azijos, Sirijos ir Egipto užkariavimas (334–332 m. pr m. e.)
 334 m. pr. m. e. mūšyje prie Graniko upės sumušė Darijaus III kariuomenę.
 Antrieji Aleksandro kampanijos prieš Persiją metai prasidėjo nuo žygio per Mažosios Azijos vidurio aukštumas. Karalius išvyko iš Frygijos sostinės Gordijo ir per kelias dienas nusigavo į ryčiau įsikūrusią Ankyrą. Paskui makedonai pasuko atgal į pietus link Viduržemio jūros. Aleksandras persikėlė per Halį ir po daugelį dienų trukusios kelionės nusigavo į Kapadokiją, paskui pasiekė Tauro kalnus, skiriančius Mažosios Azijos aukštumas nuo Viduržemio jūros pakrantės. Vienintelis kelias per šią kliūtį buvo siaura perėja, kurią saugojo Kilikijos satrapo Arsamo kariai, vadinama „Kilikijos Vartais“ – vartai į derlingą Kilikijos žemę ir Siriją. Visame šiame kelyje Aleksandras didesnio pasipriešinimo nesulaukė.
 333 m. pr. m. e. lapkričio pradžioje Aleksandro vadovauja makedoniečių armija susitiko su persų karaliaus Darijaus III armija prie Iso.
 Mūšio vieta ir susiklosčiusios aplinkybės buvo palankios Aleksandrui. Didžiulė persų armija buvo užspausta siaurame pakrantės ruože. Iso mūšis baigėsi persų sutriuškinimu, o pats karalius Darijus III buvo priverstas bėgti. Savo stovykloje jis paliko savo šeimą, kuri kaip trofėjus atiteko Aleksandrui, o su Tesalijos raitininkų pagalba buvo perimtas ir persų karaliaus iždas Damaske. Bet svarbiausias trofėjus, Aleksandro akimis, buvo Barsinė. Barsinė kaip pabėgėlė anksčiau gyveno Filipo II rūmuose, kai jos tėvas ir Memnonas ieškojo ten prieglobsčio. Ji turbūt pažinojo Aleksandrą Makedonijoje ir, galimas daiktas, juodu buvo draugai. Barsinė buvo pirmoji moteris, kurią Aleksandras pamilo. Jis nevedė jos, bet tarp jų užsimezgė ilgas romanas. Visi pasakotojai sutaria, kad tai buvo nuostabi, graži ir žavinga moteris, jo varžovo Memnono iš Rodo našlė.
 Aleksandras paliko stovyklavietę prie Iso ir nužygiavo per Vartus į Siriją, o paskui pasuko į pietus Libano pakrantės link. Perėjęs senąją graikų prekybos koloniją prie Al Minos greta siauros lygumos tarp jūros ir kalnų, jis pasiekė finikiečių Marato miestą. Persų laivyno finikiečių laivai tuo metu kovojo Egėjo jūroje, ir pasipriešinti Aleksandrui ten nebuvo kam. Paskui per dvi dienas nužygiavo iki Biblo, į pietus nuo jo kyšulyje įsikūrusi Berutą, o toliau Libano pakrante į garsų finikiečių uostą Sidoną. Iš visų Finikijos miestų tik Tyras, įsikūręs saloje, atsisakė pripažinti Aleksandro valdžią.
 Bet 332 m. pr. m. e. po septynių mėnesių apsupties, miestas-tvirtovė buvo užimtas iš jūros pusės. Po šios Aleksandro pergalės, nebeliko persų Viduržiemio jūros laivyno ir makedoniečių armija be trukdžių galėjo sulaukti pastiprinimo jūra.
 Persijos užkariavimas
 331 metais Gaugamelų mūšyje sutriuškino persų kariuomenę, užėmė Babiloną, užkariavo Persiją.
 Užimtuose kraštuose Aleksandras diegė graikų kultūrą, perėmė dalį vietinių papročių, steigė įtvirtintas gyvenvietes, valdyti patikėjo vietiniams kitataučiams.
 Žygis į Vidurinę Aziją (329–327 m. pr m. e.)
 330–329 metais užėmė Irano dalį, nužygiavo į Vidurio Aziją.
 Žygis į Indiją (326–325 m. pr m. e.)
 327 metais pasiekė Pandžabą, kitais metais persikėlė per Indą, prie Hidaspo upės sumušė vietinio valdovo kariuomenę, bet išvarginta kariuomenė atsisakė vykti toliau.
 Aleksandro mirtis
 323 m. pr. m. e. gegužės pabaigoje ir birželio pradžioje Aleksandras ruošėsi būsimajam žygiui į Arabiją. Kelionei buvo baigiami rengti šimtai laivų, o jų įgulos lavinosi lenktyniaudamos Eufratu. Tai turėjo būti milžiniško masto ekspedicija – buvo ketinama plaukti įlanka į pietus, kirsti sąsiaurį ir apiplaukti pietinį pusiasalio krantą, o tada traukti Raudonąja jūra link Egipto.
 Vieną vakarą Aleksandras surengė pokylį savo laivyno vadui Nearchui, kitą vakarą – šventę Heraklio garbei. Puotos pabaigoje Aleksandras vienu dideliu mauku išgėrė visą taurę neskiesto vyno ir iš skausmo taip suriko, tarytum būtų patyręs smūgį. Jam pasidarė silpna, ir tik draugų padedamas nusigavo iki savo lovos. Kitą dieną jis vis dar buvo silpnas, smarkiai karščiavo. Jis vis dar manė netrukus pasveikti ir plauksiąs su savo laivais į Arabiją, bet jo bičiuliai dabar ėmė smarkiai nerimauti.
 Tarp karių pasklido žinia, kad karalius sunkiai serga. Artėjant trisdešimt trečiajam jo gimtadieniui karštligė nepasitraukė, skausmas sustiprėjo ir pats Aleksandras suprato, kad galas jau čia pat. Jis nusimovė savo karališkąjį žiedą su antspaudu ir atidavė jį savo draugui Perdikui, kad šis galėtų laikinai vykdyti regento pareigas, tačiau kas bus galutinis įpėdinis, liko neaišku. Imperijai grėsė suirutė, jeigu karalius aiškiai neišsakys savo valios. Galiausiai bičiuliai priėjo prie jo lovos krašto ir ėmė maldauti įvardyti savo įpėdinį: Kam palieki savo karalystę? Didžiulėmis pastangomis Aleksandras sušnabždėjo: Stipriausiajam. Su tais žodžiais Aleksandras užmerkė akis ir mirė.
 Iškart po Aleksandro mirties pasklido gandai, kad karalius buvo nužudytas. Spėjama, kad Aleksandras mirė dėl natūralių priežasčių. Galimas daiktas, kad jis daugelį metų sirgo maliarija. Išgyvenęs daug sunkių sužeidimų, nepaliaujami dizenterijos užkratai ir ypač Indijoje pradurtas plautis susilpnino jo pasipriešinimą ligai. Prie viso to prisidėjo ir besaikis alkoholio vartojimas, įprastas Makedonijos karaliams. Jeigu jį nužudė ne maliarija, plaučių infekcija ar kepenų nepakankamumas, kita galima priežastis, galėjo būti vidurių šiltinė.
 Aleksandro kūną buvo nutarta balzamuoti ir išsiųsti į Makedoniją, tačiau šiam planui sutrukdė Ptolemėjas – jis užpuolė laidotuvių eiseną, pagrobė karaliaus kūną ir nusivežė jį į Egiptą. Ten jo kapas Aleksandrijoje tapo mėgstama keliautojų iš Graikijos ir Romos lankymo vieta; prieš prasidedant krikščionybės erai jį aplankė ir imperatorius Augustas.
 Po Aleksandro
 Imperijos skilimas
 Sužinoję apie Aleksandro mirtį, valdiniai persai pagal tradiciją nusiskuto galvas, o Darijaus motina Sisigambridė, nusimarino badu, tarytum praradusi savo tikrą sūnų.
 Makedonų kareiviai netrukus ėmė kovoti tarpusavyje, nesutardami, kurį pretendentą į valdžią palaikyti: ambicingą žiedo turėtoją Perdiką, kuris siūlė laukti, kol gims Aleksandro ir Roksanos vaikas; pėstininkų vadą ir konservatorių atramą Meleagrą, kuris rėmė Aleksandro netikrą brolį Aridajų; ar karaliaus vaikystės draugą karvedį Ptolemėją. Aleksandras paliko milžinišką imperiją, sudarytą iš atskirų teritorijų. Praliejus daug kraujo, skirtingų klikų vadai susitarė susitikti ir taikiai nuspręsti, kaip vadovauti imperijai. Tada kareiviai lygumoje už Babilono pražygiavo tarp perpus perpjauto šuns, taip pagal senovės makedonų tradiciją buvo pažymima karaliaus mirtis. Paskui įvykusiame pasitarime buvo nuspręsta, kad Babilone gyvenantis protiškai atsilikęs netikras Aleksandro brolis Aridajas įžengs į sostą kaip karalius Filipas III, o būsimasis Roksanos sūnus, jeigu gims berniukas, sukakęs tinkamo amžiaus, užims savo tėvo vietą. Niekas rimtai nežiūrėjo į Aridają kaip į valdovą, laikė jį tik laikinu ir pakeičiamu Makedonijos karališkosios dinastijos simboliu.
 Pagrindiniams varžovams tiesiog reikėjo laiko įtvirtinti savo padėtį tose imperijos dalyse, kurias jie troško užvaldyti patys. Karvedžiai ir Roksanos vaikui neketino leisti būti kuo nors daugiau negu politiniu pėstininku. Aleksandro nesantuokinio sūnaus Heraklio, kurio jis susilaukė su savo meiluže perse Barsine, jie apskritai nelaikė svarstytinu kandidatu.
 Per šį susitikimą buvo susitarta dėl imperijos padalijimo. Ptolemėjas gavo Egiptą, o Seleukui atiteko didžioji dalis Azijos. Antipatras ir jo sūnus Kasandras išsaugojo valdžią Makedonijoje ir Graikijoje, o buvusiam karaliaus asmens sargybiniui Lisimachui atiteko Trakija.
 Netrukus kilo pilietiniai karai, kruvina ilgametė kova, kurioje kiekviena pusė siekė sustiprinti tik savo pozicijas. Iš tų, kurie pažinojo Aleksandrą ir jam tarnavo, mažai kas mirė sava mirtimi. Perdikas nužudė Meleagrą šventykloje, kur jis bandė ieškoti prieglobsčio. Daugelis Meleagro šalininkų buvo numesti kariuomenės drambliams po kojomis ir sutrypti. Aleksandro žmona Roksana, pritariama Perdiko, netrukus nunuodijo Darėjo III dukterį Stateirą, kurią Aleksandras vedė Sūzuose, taip pat jos seserį ir įmetė abiejų moterų kūnus į šulinį.
 Pati Roksana pagimdė berniuką, kuris buvo pavadintas Aleksandru IV. Perdikas, siekdamas savų tikslų, gynė ir motiną, ir vaiką, tačiau galiausiai žuvo Egipte, kovodamas su Ptolemėju. Roksana su jaunuoju sūnumi pabėgo į Makedoniją, kur juos mielai priėmė Aleksandro motina Olimpija. Tačiau netrukus juos nužudė Kasandras ir taip nutraukė Aleksandro dinastiją.
 Olimpija nesiliovė rezgusi sąmokslų. Dalyvaudama kovose dėl valdžios ji nužudė daugelį Makedonijos kilmingųjų ir pelnė amžiną jų neapykantą. Galiausiai Kasandras ją suėmė ir, nors buvo pažadėjęs išsaugoti jai gyvybę, įsakė ją nužudyti.
 Daugumos kitų Aleksandro draugų ir šeimos narių likimas buvo toks pat žiaurus. Į Makedoniją sugrįžusį netikrą karaliaus brolį Aridają nužudė trakų sargybiniai, tariamai vykdydami Olimpijos nurodymus. Sūnus Heraklis ir jo motina Barsinė, manoma, kad buvo nunuodyti Pergame.
 Šaltiniai
 Nuorodos
 www.arzinai.lt portalo straipsnis apie Aleksandrą Makedonietį .
 Makedonijos valdovai
 Karvedžiai


text:
Handbalistele de la CSM Ploieşti, învingătoare în duelul prahovean în campionatul junioarelor III | BitNews - Stiri la Minut
 La finalul săptămânii trecute, în Campionatul Naţional de Handbal la categoria junioare III a avut loc etapa a II-a. În seria D, în care sunt prezente şi cinci echipe din Prahova, două dintre grupările prahovene îmvingătoare în prima rundă s-au confruntat în meci direct, pe parchetul Sălii „Olimpia”.
 Duelul 100% prahovean s-a încheiat cu victoria la limită a micuţelor handbaliste de la CSM Ploieşti, în dauna celor de la HC Activ CSO Plopeni, scor 25-24 (13-11). De remarcat evoluţia jucătoarei din tabăra învingătoare Daria Grădişteanu, care a înscris mai mult de jumătate dintre golurile de la CSM (13), dintre care cinci (din tot atâtea aruncări) de la linia de şapte metri.
 În cadrul etapei, CSO Tricolorul Breaza a obţinut, de asemenea, a doua victorie la rând, întrecând, în deplasare, pe CSM Râmnicu Sărat, scor 47-11 (26-4), CSO Mizil a câştigat, pe teren propriu, cu CSŞ Dinamo Braşov, scor 35-27 (14-7), în vreme ce CS Brazi a cedat pe terenul grupării LPS Buzău, scor 24-42 (13-24). S-a mai disputat, de asemenea, CSŞ Sf. Gheorghe – CS Sporting Ghimbav, scor 17-33 (7-20), în timp ce Corona 2010 Braşov a stat.
 1 LPS Buzău 2 2 0 0 70-44 5
 2 CSO Tricolorul Breaza 2 2 0 0 89-42 4
 3 CSM Ploieşti 2 2 0 0 63-36 4
 4 CS Sporting Ghimbav 2 2 0 0 65-42 4
 5 HC Activ CSO Plopeni 2 1 0 1 68-32 2
 6 CSO Mizil 2 1 0 1 66-69 2
 7 CSŞ Sf. Gheorghe 2 0 0 2 37-61 1
 8 ASC Corona 2010 Braşov 1 0 0 1 25-32 0
 9 CSŞ Dinamo Braşov 1 0 0 1 27-35 0
 10 CS Brazi 2 0 0 2 36-80 0
 11 CSM Rm. Sărat 2 0 0 2 18-91 0
 * LPS Buzău (1p – respectare cerinţe talie)
 * CSŞ Sf. Gheorghe (1p – respectare cerinţe talie)
 « Ciclistul Valentin Vasiloiu, o evoluţie decentă pentru România la contratimpul de la Mondiale
 Petrolul îl „reînvie” pe Goga – dublă după 8 ani şi jumătate ! »


type: caselaw

text:
 8.9.2007
 RO
 Jurnalul Oficial al Uniunii Europene
 C 211/27
 Recurs introdus la 11 iulie 2007 de 3F, fostă Specialarbejderforbundet i Danmark (SID) împotriva ordonanței Tribunalului de Primă Instanță (Camera a doua extinsă) pronunțată la 23 aprilie 2007 în cauza T-30/03: Specialarbejderforbundet i Danmark (SID)/Comisia Comunităților Europene
 (Cauza C-319/07 P)
 (2007/C 211/49)
 Limba de procedură: engleza
 Părțile
 Recurentă: 3F, fostă Specialarbejderforbundet i Danmark (SID) (reprezentanți: A. Bentley, Barrister și A. Worsøe, advokat)
 Celelalte părți în proces: Comisia Comunităților Europene, Regatul Danemarcei, Regatul Norvegiei
 Concluziile recurentei
 —
 anularea ordonanței Tribunalului de Primă Instanță din 23 aprilie 2007, pronunțată în cauza T-30/03, Specialarbejderforbundet i Danmark (SID)/Comisia Comunităților Europene;
 —
 declararea cererii recurentei în cauza T-30/03 ca fiind admisibilă și
 —
 în orice caz, obligarea Comisiei la plata cheltuielilor de judecată efectuate de recurentă în prezentul recurs.
 Motivele și principalele argumente
 Recurenta susține că ordonanța atacată trebuie anulată pentru următoarele motive:
 1.
 Tribunalul de Primă Instanță a săvârșit o eroare de drept atunci când s-a bazat pe hotărârea pronunțată în cauza C-67/96, Albany, pentru a statua că recurenta nu putea invoca propria poziție concurențială în negocierea convențiilor colective pentru a stabili că era vizată individual.
 2.
 Tribunalul de Primă Instanță a săvârșit o eroare de drept atunci când a statuat că recurenta nu putea invoca aspecte sociale pentru a stabili că era vizată individual.
 3.
 Tribunalul de Primă Instanță a aplicat în mod greșit jurisprudența Plaumann și ARE atunci când a statuat că recurenta nu poate fi considerată ca fiind vizată individual, numai pentru că ajutorul în cauză este acordat destinatarilor prin intermediul unei reduceri a revendicărilor salariale ale marinarilor care beneficiază de scutirea de impozit pe venit.
 4
 Tribunalul de Primă Instanță a aplicat în mod greșit jurisprudența Van der Kooy și CIRFS atunci când a statuat că propriile interese ale recurentei, în calitate de negociator, nu au fost afectate de măsuri fiscale.


jurisdiction: US

text:
 II
 109th CONGRESS
 1st Session
 S. 1573
 IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED
 STATES
 July 29, 2005
 Mrs. Dole (for herself
 and Mr. Corzine) introduced the following
 bill; which was read twice and referred to the
 Committee on
 Finance
 A BILL
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986
 to encourage the funding of collectively bargained retiree health benefits.
 1.Short titleThis Act may be cited as the
 Retiree Health Benefits Act of
 2005.
 2.Funding of retiree
 health benefits
 (a)Collectively
 bargained transfer treated as a qualified transfer
 (1)In
 generalSection 420(b) of the
 Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (defining qualified transfer) is amended by
 redesignating paragraph (5) as paragraph (6) and by inserting after paragraph
 (4) the following new paragraph:
 (5)A collectively bargained transfer (as
 defined in subsection (e)(5)) shall be treated as a qualified
 transfer.
 .
 (2)Conforming
 amendments
 (A)Subparagraph (B) of section 420(b)(2) of
 such Code is amended by inserting or a collectively bargained
 transfer after paragraph (4).
 (B)Paragraph (3) of section 420(b) of such
 Code is amended to read as follows:
 (3)Limitation on
 amount transferred
 (A)In
 generalThe amount of excess
 pension assets which may be transferred in a qualified transfer (other than a
 collectively bargained transfer) shall not exceed the amount which is
 reasonably estimated to be the amount the employer maintaining the plan will
 pay (whether directly or through reimbursement) out of such account during the
 taxable year of the transfer for qualified current retiree health
 liabilities.
 (B)Exception for
 collectively bargained transfersThe amount of excess pension assets which
 may be transferred in a collectively bargained transfer shall not exceed the
 amount which is reasonably estimated, in accordance with the provisions of the
 collective bargaining agreement and generally accepted accounting principles,
 to be the amount the employer maintaining the plan will pay (whether directly
 or through reimbursement) out of such account during the collectively bargained
 cost maintenance period for collectively bargained retiree health
 liabilities.
 .
 (C)Section 420(b)(6) of such Code, as
 redesignated by paragraph (1), is amended by inserting (other than a
 collectively bargained transfer) after No
 transfer.
 (b)Requirements of
 plans making collectively bargained transfers
 (1)In
 generalParagraph (1) of
 section 420(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to requirements
 of plan transferring assets) is amended to read as follows:
 (1)Use of
 transferred assets
 (A)In
 generalExcept in the case of
 a collectively bargained transfer, any assets transferred to a health benefits
 account in a qualified transfer (and any income allocable thereto) shall be
 used only to pay qualified current retiree health liabilities (other than
 liabilities of key employees not taken into account under subsection (e)(1)(D))
 for the taxable year of the transfer (whether directly or through
 reimbursement).
 (B)Collectively
 bargained transferAny assets
 transferred to a health benefits account in a collectively bargained transfer
 (and any income allocable thereto) shall be used only to pay collectively
 bargained retiree health liabilities (other than liabilities of key employees
 not taken into account under subsection (e)(6)(D)) for the taxable year of the
 transfer or for any subsequent taxable year during the collectively bargained
 cost maintenance period (whether directly or through reimbursement).
 (C)Amounts not
 used to pay for health benefits
 (i)In
 generalAny assets
 transferred to a health benefits account in a qualified transfer (and any
 income allocable thereto) which are not used as provided in subparagraph (A)
 (in the case of a qualified transfer other than a collectively bargained
 transfer) or cannot be used as provided in subparagraph (B) (in the case of a
 collectively bargained transfer) shall be transferred out of the account to the
 transferor plan.
 (ii)Tax treatment
 of amountsAny amount
 transferred out of an account under clause (i)—
 (I)shall not be includible in the gross income
 of the employer, but
 (II)shall be treated as an employer reversion
 for purposes of section 4980 (without regard to subsection (d) thereof).
 (D)Ordering
 ruleFor purposes of this
 section, any amount paid out of a health benefits account shall be treated as
 paid first out of the assets and income described in subparagraph (A) (in the
 case of a qualified transfer other than a collectively bargained transfer) or
 subparagraph (B) (in the case of a collectively bargained
 transfer).
 .
 (2)Conforming
 amendments
 (A)Subparagraph (A) of section 420(c)(3) of
 such Code is amended to read as follows:
 (A)In
 generalThe requirements of
 this paragraph are met if—
 (i)except as provided in clause (ii), each
 group health plan or arrangement under which applicable health benefits are
 provided provides that the applicable employer cost for each taxable year
 during the cost maintenance period shall not be less than the higher of the
 applicable employer costs for each of the 2 taxable years immediately preceding
 the taxable year of the qualified transfer, and
 (ii)in the case of a collectively bargained
 transfer, each collectively bargained group health plan under which
 collectively bargained health benefits are provided provides that the
 collectively bargained employer cost for each taxable year during the
 collectively bargained cost maintenance period shall not be less than the
 amount specified by the collective bargaining
 agreement.
 .
 (B)Section 420(c)(3) of such Code is amended
 by redesignating subparagraphs (C), (D), and (E) as subparagraphs (D), (E), and
 (F), respectively, and by inserting after subparagraph (B) the following new
 subparagraph:
 (C)Collectively
 bargained employer costFor
 purposes of this paragraph, the term collectively bargained employer
 cost means the average cost per covered individual of providing
 collectively bargained retiree health benefits as determined in accordance with
 the applicable collective bargaining agreement. Such agreement may provide for
 an appropriate reduction in the collectively bargained employer cost to take
 into account any portion of the collectively bargained retiree health benefits
 that is provided or financed by a government program or other
 source.
 .
 (C)Subparagraph (E) of section 420(c)(3) of
 such Code (as redesignated by subparagraph (B)) is amended to read as
 follows:
 (E)Maintenance
 periodFor purposes of this
 paragraph—
 (i)Cost
 maintenance periodThe term
 cost maintenance period means the period of 5 taxable years
 beginning with the taxable year in which the qualified transfer occurs. If a
 taxable year is in 2 or more overlapping cost maintenance periods, this
 paragraph shall be applied by taking into account the highest applicable
 employer cost required to be provided under subparagraph (A)(i) for such
 taxable year.
 (ii)Collectively
 bargained cost maintenance periodThe term collectively bargained cost
 maintenance period means, with respect to each covered retiree and his
 covered spouse and dependents, the shorter of—
 (I)the remaining lifetime of such covered
 retiree and his covered spouse and dependents, or
 (II)the period of coverage provided by the
 collectively bargained health plan (determined as of the date of the
 collectively bargained transfer) with respect to such covered retiree and his
 covered spouse and
 dependents.
 .
 (c)Limitations on
 employerSubsection (d) of
 section 420 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended to read as
 follows:
 (d)Limitations on
 employerFor purposes of this
 title—
 (1)Deduction
 limitationsNo deduction
 shall be allowed—
 (A)for the transfer of any amount to a health
 benefits account in a qualified transfer (or any retransfer to the plan under
 subsection (c)(1)(C)),
 (B)for qualified current retiree health
 liabilities or collectively bargained retiree health liabilities paid out of
 the assets (and income) described in subsection (c)(1), or
 (C)except in the case of a collectively
 bargained transfer, for any amounts to which subparagraph (B) does not apply
 and which are paid for qualified current retiree health liabilities for the
 taxable year to the extent such amounts are not greater than the excess (if
 any) of—
 (i)the amount determined under subparagraph
 (A) (and income allocable thereto), over
 (ii)the amount determined under subparagraph
 (B).
 (2)Other
 limitations
 (A)No
 contributions allowedExcept
 as provided in subparagraph (B), an employer may not contribute after December
 31, 1990, any amount to a health benefits account or welfare benefit fund (as
 defined in section 419(e)(1)) with respect to qualified current retiree health
 liabilities for which transferred assets are required to be used under
 subsection (c)(1)(A).
 (B)ExceptionAn employer may contribute an amount to a
 health benefits account or welfare benefit fund (as defined in section
 419(e)(1)) with respect to collectively bargained retiree health liabilities
 for which transferred assets are required to be used under subsection
 (c)(1)(B), and the deductibility of any such contribution shall be governed by
 the limits applicable to the deductibility of contributions to a welfare
 benefit fund under a collective bargaining agreement (as determined under
 section 419A(f)(5)(A)) without regard to whether such contributions are made to
 a health benefits account or welfare benefit fund and without regard to the
 provisions of section 404 or the other provisions of this
 section.
 .
 (d)DefinitionsSection 420(e) of the Internal Revenue Code
 of 1986 (relating to definition and special rules) is amended by adding at the
 end the following new paragraphs:
 (5)Collectively
 bargained transferThe term
 collectively bargained transfer means a transfer—
 (A)of excess pension assets to a health
 benefits account which is part of such plan in a taxable year beginning after
 December 31, 2004,
 (B)which does not contravene any other
 provision of law,
 (C)with respect to which are met in connection
 with the plan—
 (i)the use requirements of subsection
 (c)(1),
 (ii)the vesting requirements of subsection
 (c)(2), and
 (iii)the minimum cost requirements of subsection
 (c)(3),
 (D)which is made in accordance with a
 collective bargaining agreement, and
 (E)which, before the transfer, the employer
 designates, in a written notice delivered to each employee organization that is
 a party to the collective bargaining agreement, as a collectively bargained
 transfer in accordance with this section.
 (6)Collectively
 bargained retiree health liabilities
 (A)In
 generalThe term
 collectively bargained retiree health liabilities means the
 present value, as of the beginning of a taxable year and determined in
 accordance with the applicable collective bargaining agreement, of all
 collectively bargained health benefits (including administrative expenses) for
 such taxable year and all subsequent taxable years during the collectively
 bargained cost maintenance period.
 (B)Reduction for
 amounts previously set asideThe amount determined under subparagraph
 (A) shall be reduced by the value (as of the close of the plan year preceding
 the year of the collectively bargained transfer) of the assets in all health
 benefits accounts or welfare benefit funds (as defined in section 419(e)(1))
 set aside to pay for the collectively bargained retiree health
 liabilities.
 (C)Key employees
 excludedIf an employee is a
 key employee (within the meaning of section 416(I)(1)) with respect to any plan
 year ending in a taxable year, such employee shall not be taken into account in
 computing collectively bargained retiree health liabilities for such taxable
 year or in calculating collectively bargained employer cost under subsection
 (c)(3)(C).
 (7)Collectively
 bargained health benefitsThe
 term collectively bargained health benefits means health benefits
 or coverage which are provided to—
 (A)retired employees who, immediately before
 the collectively bargained transfer, are entitled to receive such benefits upon
 retirement and who are entitled to pension benefits under the plan, and their
 spouses and dependents, and
 (B)if specified by the provisions of the
 collective bargaining agreement governing the collectively bargained transfer,
 active employees who, following their retirement, are entitled to receive such
 benefits and who are entitled to pension benefits under the plan, and their
 spouses and dependents.
 (8)Collectively
 bargained health planThe
 term collectively bargained health plan means a group health plan
 or arrangement for retired employees and their spouses and dependents that is
 maintained pursuant to 1 or more collective bargaining
 agreements.
 .
 (e)Conforming
 amendments
 (1)The last sentence of section 401(h) of the
 Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by inserting (other than
 contributions with respect to collectively bargained retiree health liabilities
 within the meaning of section 420(e)(6)) after medical
 benefits.
 (2)Section 101(e)(3) of the Employee
 Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (29 U.S.C. 1021(e)(3)) is amended by
 striking Pension Funding Equity Act of 2004 and inserting
 Retiree Health Benefits Act of 2005.
 (3)Section 403(c)(1) of such Act (29 U.S.C.
 1103(c)(1)) is amended by striking Pension Funding Equity Act of
 2004 and inserting Retiree Health Benefits Act of
 2005.
 (4)Paragraph (13) of section 408(b) of such
 Act (29 U.S.C. 1108(b)) is amended—
 (A)by striking before January 1,
 2014 and inserting in accordance with section 420 of the
 Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (as in effect on the date of the enactment of the
 Retiree Health Benefits Act of 2005), and
 (B)by striking Pension Funding Equity
 Act of 2004 and inserting Retiree Health Benefits Act of
 2005.
 (f)Effective
 dateThe amendments made by
 this section shall apply to years beginning after December 31, 2004.


text:
VISTA l'istanza inviata ai sensi degli artt. 7 e 8 del Codice in materia di protezione dei dati personali (d.lg. 30 giugno 2003, n. 196) da XY al Comune di Montecatini Terme (presso il quale aveva prestato servizio quale "collaboratore professionale" prima di essere licenziato), con la quale l'interessato ha chiesto la cancellazione del proprio nominativo dal testo di una deliberazione della Giunta comunale, adottata il ZW, per autorizzare il Sindaco alla costituzione in giudizio nel procedimento promosso contro il provvedimento di licenziamento, rilevando che tale deliberazione, sebbene contenga il predetto nominativo oscurato in diversi punti, lo riporta invece integralmente al foglio n. 3; rilevato che l'interessato ha chiesto, altresì, di conoscere le finalità e le modalità del trattamento dei dati che lo riguardano contenuti nella medesima deliberazione, nonché l'attestazione che la cancellazione dei dati sia stata portata a conoscenza di coloro ai quali gli stessi sono stati diffusi o comunicati;
 VISTA la nota del 6 giugno 2006 con la quale il Comune di Montecatini Terme, nel comunicare le finalità e le modalità del trattamento effettuato, ha dichiarato che il nome e cognome dell'interessato sono rimasti visibili in un solo punto della deliberazione in questione, "in seguito ad un mero errore materiale", mentre sono stati oggetto di omissis nella restante parte, anche se, per la natura dei dati trattati, non vi era obbligo alcuno per il comune di oscurarli;
 VISTO il ricorso regolarizzato il 23 ottobre 2006 con il quale XY ha ribadito le richieste formulate nei confronti del comune, ritenendo insoddisfacente il riscontro, e ha chiesto al Garante di sanzionare il comportamento, a suo avviso illecito, tenuto dal comune medesimo;
 VISTI gli ulteriori atti d'ufficio e, in particolare, la nota del 30 ottobre 2006 con la quale questa Autorità, ai sensi dell'art. 149 del Codice, ha invitato il titolare del trattamento a fornire riscontro alle richieste dell'interessato, nonché l'ulteriore nota del 5 dicembre 2006 con cui, ai sensi dell'art. 149, comma 7, del Codice, è stato prorogato il termine per la decisione sul ricorso;
 VISTA la memoria anticipata via fax il 15 novembre 2006 con la quale il comune resistente, pur ribadendo la liceità della pubblicazione integrale all'albo pretorio della deliberazione in questione, non contenendo la stessa dati da oscurare, ha dichiarato che, "in applicazione del principio di coerenza degli atti amministrativi, coerenza venuta meno () solamente a causa di un mero errore materiale" che ha lasciato visibile, in un punto della deliberazione, il nome e cognome dell'interessato, l'amministrazione comunale provvederà "ad effettuare le opportune operazioni di trasformazione del dato () in forma anonima" e alla nuova pubblicazione dell'atto così modificato;
 VISTA la nota del 19 dicembre 2006 con la quale il comune resistente ha comunicato che la deliberazione della Giunta comunale del ZW "è stata ripubblicata in data 7 dicembre 2006" all'albo pretorio;
 VISTE le memorie datate 20 dicembre 2006 e 2 gennaio 2007 con le quali il ricorrente ha ribadito la fondatezza del ricorso, rilevando in particolare che, a suo avviso, l'avvenuta trasformazione in forma anonima dei dati che lo riguardano non sarebbe avvenuta in modo legittimo, non essendo la stessa stata oggetto di nuova deliberazione da parte della Giunta comunale;
 RILEVATO che le operazioni di trattamento poste in essere dal Comune di Montecatini Terme, connesse all'ordinaria gestione di un contenzioso concernente il rapporto lavorativo di un dipendente, non risultano svolte in violazione degli artt. 18 e s. del Codice, anche in riferimento alle vigenti disposizioni sullo svolgimento dei procedimenti amministrativi e sulla redazione e doverosa pubblicazione di alcuni atti, nei termini previsti anche dalla legge n. 241/1990 e dal d.lg. n. 267/2000 (testo unico sull'ordinamento degli enti locali); rilevato, infatti, che tale testo unico prevede in particolare, all'art. 124, che le deliberazioni comunali debbano essere pubblicate mediante affissione all'albo pretorio, salvo specifiche disposizioni di legge;
 RILEVATO che, come già affermato da questa Autorità (cfr., tra gli altri, provv. del 12 gennaio 2004, in www.garanteprivacy.it, doc. web n. 1053395), le necessarie forme di pubblicità degli atti deliberativi devono indurre le amministrazioni interessate a selezionare con particolare attenzione i dati personali, specie se di carattere sensibile o attinenti a dati giudiziari, la cui menzione negli atti da pubblicare deve risultare, caso per caso, realmente necessaria per le finalità perseguite dai singoli provvedimenti, nel rispetto dei principi di pertinenza e non eccedenza di cui all'art. 11 del Codice (e in applicazione del bilanciamento previsto dall'art. 10, comma 1, del citato d.lg. n. 267/2000 tra il diritto alla riservatezza e la pubblicità degli atti dell'amministrazione comunale);
 RITENUTO che non risultano, dagli atti, profili di illiceità del trattamento effettuato dall'amministrazione resistente (né in riferimento all'adozione della citata deliberazione, né in ordine alle modalità di diffusione dei dati del ricorrente contenuti nella stessa) e che non si ravvisano, di conseguenza, i presupposti per contestare violazioni amministrative o per una denuncia di reato;
 RILEVATO, comunque, che il comune resistente ha fornito riscontro alle richieste dell'interessato, specificando meglio le modalità e le finalità del trattamento (ad integrazione delle indicazioni fornite in sede di risposta all'interpello preventivo) e dichiarando di aver omesso gli estremi identificativi del ricorrente dalla deliberazione della Giunta comunale del ZW pubblicata nuovamente all'albo pretorio, e ritenuto, pertanto, di dover dichiarare non luogo a provvedere sul ricorso in ordine alle richieste riguardanti i diritti di cui all'art. 7 del Codice;


text:
 31.8.2013
 RO
 Jurnalul Oficial al Uniunii Europene
 C 252/14
 Recurs introdus la 24 mai 2013 de Dole Food Company, Inc. și Dole Fresh Fruit Europe Ltd & Co. împotriva Hotărârii Tribunalului (Camera a opta) din 14 martie 2013 în cauza T-588/08, Dole Food Company, Inc. și Dole Fresh Fruit Europe Ltd & Co./Comisia
 (Cauza C-286/13 P)
 2013/C 252/22
 Limba de procedură: engleza
 Părțile
 Recurente: Dole Food Company, Inc. și Dole Fresh Fruit Europe Ltd & Co. (reprezentant: J.-F. Bellis, avocat)
 Cealaltă parte din procedură: Comisia Europeană
 Concluziile recurentelor
 Recurentele solicită Curții:
 —
 anularea, în tot sau în parte, a hotărârii atacate, în măsura în care prin aceasta a fost respinsă acțiunea recurentelor;
 —
 anularea, în tot sau în parte, a Deciziei Comisiei din 15 octombrie 2008, în măsura în care se referă la recurente;
 —
 anularea sau reducerea amenzii aplicate recurentelor, în temeiul competenței de fond prevăzute la articolul 261 TFUE;
 —
 în subsidiar, trimiterea cauzei la Tribunal spre rejudecare în conformitate cu hotărârea Curții de Justiție;
 —
 obligarea Comisiei la plata cheltuielilor de judecată efectuate în prezenta procedură și în procedura în fața Tribunalului.
 Motivele și principalele argumente
 Prin intermediul primului motiv de recurs, împărțit în cinci aspecte, recurentele susțin că Tribunalul a săvârșit mai multe neregularități de procedură în cadrul controlului exercitat:
 —
 Tribunalul a săvârșit o eroare prin faptul că a autorizat Comisia să răspundă pentru prima dată, în cursul procedurii jurisdicționale, unor probe din dosarul său care contraziceau constatările efectuate în decizie;
 —
 Tribunalul a declarat în mod greșit inadmisibilă prezentarea de către recurente a unor probe din dosarul Comisiei în scopul de a contesta un argument invocat pentru prima dată de Comisie în duplică;
 —
 Tribunalul a declarat în mod greșit inadmisibilă o anexă prezentată de recurente în sprijinul argumentului acestora conform căruia Comisia a scos din context declarații efectuate de recurente în decursul procedurii administrative;
 —
 Tribunalul a încălcat principiul egalității armelor prin faptul că nu a examinat probe prezentate de recurente în timpul procedurii jurisdicționale și
 —
 Tribunalul nu a stabilit starea de fapt în mod adecvat.
 Prin intermediul celui de al doilea motiv de recurs, recurentele susțin că Tribunalul a denaturat elemente de fapt cruciale pentru o apreciere corectă a conduitei reproșate în contextul său juridic și economic.
 Prin intermediul celui de al treilea motiv de recurs, împărțit în cinci aspecte, recurentele susțin că Tribunalul a apreciat în mod greșit probele:
 —
 Tribunalul nu a motivat în mod adecvat confirmarea calculului cotei de piață pe care s-a bazat Comisia pentru stabilirea structurii pieței relevante;
 —
 Tribunalul a concluzionat în mod greșit că Comisia nu este obligată să specifice conținutul discuțiilor purtate de recurente cu alte întreprinderi, care constituie o restrângere a concurenței prin obiect;
 —
 Tribunalul a concluzionat în mod greșit că Comisia a descris clar conținutul discuțiilor purtate de recurente cu alte întreprinderi, care constituie o restrângere a concurenței prin obiect;
 —
 Tribunalul nu a răspuns argumentului recurentelor potrivit căruia anumiți angajați nu puteau să facă schimb de informații credibile și
 —
 Tribunalul a reținut o calificare greșită a faptelor concluzionând că discuțiile menționate constituie o restrângere a concurenței prin obiect.
 Prin intermediul celui de al patrulea motiv de recurs, împărțit în două aspecte, recurentele susțin că Tribunalul a săvârșit mai multe erori la calcularea cuantumului amenzii aplicate:
 —
 Tribunalul a calculat greșit cuantumul amenzii pe baza vânzărilor companiilor față de care nu s-a reținut existența vreunei încălcări și
 —
 Tribunalul a luat în considerare vânzările acelorași produse de două ori, în mod greșit, pentru calcularea cuantumului amenzii.