text:
 Svarīgs juridisks paziņojums
 |
 52006PC0252
 Projekts Padomes regula par grozījumiem V pielikumā Eiropas Parlamenta un Padomes Regulā (EK) Nr. 850/2004 par noturīgiem organiskajiem piesārņotājiem, ar ko groza Direktīvu 79/117/EEK /* COM/2006/0252 galīgā redakcija */
 [pic] | EIROPAS KOPIENU KOMISIJA |Briselē, 31.5.2006COM(2006) 252 galīgā redakcijaProjektsPADOMES REGULApar grozījumiem V pielikumā Eiropas Parlamenta un Padomes Regulā (EK) Nr. 850/2004 par noturīgiem organiskajiem piesārņotājiem, ar ko groza Direktīvu 79/117/EEK(iesniegusi Komisija)PASKAIDROJUMA RAKSTSRegulas 850/2004 EK par noturīgiem organiskajiem piesārņotājiem 7. panta 5. punktā paredzēts, ka līdz 2005. gada 31. decembrim saskaņā ar 17. panta 2. punktā minēto procedūru 4. punkta b) apakšpunkta mērķiem V pielikuma 2. daļā noteiks koncentrāciju robežas. Ievērojot 17. panta 1. punktu, jautājumos, kas attiecas uz atkritumiem saskaņā ar šo regulu, Komisijai palīdz komiteja, kas izveidota ar Direktīvas 75/442/EEK 18. pantu.Tāpēc 2005. gada 25. janvārī Komisija iesniedza regulas projektu balsošanai komitejā, kas izveidota saskaņā ar Direktīvas 75/442/EEK par atkritumiem 18. punktu. Regulas projekts balsošanā nesaņēma balsu kvalificētu vairākumu.Tāpēc saskaņā ar Lēmuma 468/1999/EEK 5. pantā noteikto kārtību Padomes regulas priekšlikums tiek iesniegts Padomei. Ja Padome nepieņems lēmumu triju mēnešu laikā no priekšlikuma nosūtīšanas dienas, priekšlikumā ierosinātos pasākumus pieņems Komisija.ProjektsPADOMES REGULApar grozījumiem V pielikumā Eiropas Parlamenta un Padomes Regulā (EK) Nr. 850/2004 par noturīgiem organiskajiem piesārņotājiem, ar ko groza Direktīvu 79/117/EEK(Dokuments attiecas uz EEZ)EIROPAS SAVIENĪBAS PADOME,ņemot vērā Eiropas Kopienas dibināšanas līgumu,ņemot vērā Eiropas Parlamenta un Padomes 2004. gada 29. aprīļa Regulu (EK) Nr. 850/2004 par noturīgiem organiskajiem piesārņotājiem, ar ko groza Direktīvu 79/117/EEK[?], un jo īpaši tās 7. panta 5. punkta pirmo daļu, 7. panta 6. punktu un 14. panta 3.punktu,tā kā:1. Komisija veikusi pētījumu par Regulas Nr. 850/2004 to noteikumu īstenošanu, kas attiecas uz atkritumiem. Pētījumā noteiktas maksimāli pieļaujamās koncentrācijas robežas Regulas (EK) 850/2004 V pielikuma 2. daļas mērķiem. Tās pārsniedzot iespējama kaitīga iedarbība uz cilvēka organismu un vidi. Tāpēc attiecīgi jāizdara grozījumi V pielikumā Regulā (EK) Nr. 850/2004.2. Nav apstiprinātas piemērotas analītiskās metodes kopējās toksafena koncentrācijas noteikšanai, kas ir vairāk nekā 670 dažādu vielu maisījums. Tomēr minētajā pētījumā Eiropas Savienībā netika konstatēti nekādi krājumi, kas sastāv no toksafena, to satur vai ir ar to piesārņoti. Turklāt pētījumā noskaidrojies, ka visos gadījumos, kad atkritumos konstatēti noturīgi organiskie piesārņotāji pesticīdi, salīdzinājumā ar noteiktajām maksimāli pieļaujamajām koncentrācijām tās parasti ir paaugstinātas. Tāpēc pašlaik pieejamās toksafena noteikšanas analītiskās metodes var uzskatīt par šīs regulas mērķim pietiekami piemērotām.3. Maksimāli pieļaujamo koncentrāciju PCDF / PCDD izsaka kā toksiskuma ekvivalentu koncentrāciju (“TEQ”), izmantojot Pasaules veselības organizācijas 1998. gadā pieņemtos toksiskuma ekvivalences koeficientus (“TEF”). Par dioksīniem līdzīgajiem PCB iegūts pietiekami daudz datu, lai iekļautu šos savienojumus, tiem nosakot toksiskuma ekvivalentu koncentrāciju (“TEQ”).4. Heksahlorcikloheksāns ( HCH ) ir tehnisks produkts, kas satur dažādu izomēru maisījumu. Veikt to pilnīgu analīzi varētu būt nelietderīgi. Toksiski ir tikai heksahlorcikloheksāna alfa-, beta- un gamma- izomēri. Tāpēc pieļaujamā koncentrācija attiecas tikai uz tiem. Lielākajai daļai gatavu nopērkamo analītisko standartu maisījumu, kas paredzēti šo savienojumu grupas analīzēm, norādīti tikai šie izomēri.5. Šajā regulā paredzēti pasākumi ir augsta līmeņa aizsardzības nodrošināšanai piemērotākie.6. Šajā regulā paredzēti pasākumi ir augsta līmeņa aizsardzības nodrošināšanai piemērotākie.Ar Regulas (EK) Nr. 850/2004 17. panta 1. punktu izveidotā komiteja pēc apspriedes 2006. gada 25. janvārī saskaņā ar minētās regulas 17. panta 2. punktā noteikto procedūru nav sniegusi atzinumu par pasākumiem Komisijas regulas priekšlikumāIR PIEŅĒMUSI ŠO REGULU.1. pantsRegulas (EK) Nr. 850/2004 V pielikumu groza saskaņā ar šīs regulas pielikumu.Article 2Šī regula stājas spēkā divdesmitajā dienā pēc tās publicēšanas Eiropas Savienības Oficiālajā Vēstnesī .Šī regula uzliek saistības kopumā un ir tieši piemērojama visās dalībvalstīs.Briselē,Padomes vārdā —Padomes priekšsēdētājsPIELIKUMSRegulas (EK) Nr. 850/2004 V pielikuma 2. daļu aizstāj ar šo.Atkritumi, kas klasificēti Komisijas Lēmumā 2000/532/EK | IV pielikumā uzskaitīto vielu maksimālās koncentrācijas robežas[?] | Darbība |10 | TERMISKO PROCESU NEORGANISKIE ATKRITUMI | aldrīns: 5000 mg/kg hlordāns: 5000 mg/kg; dieldrīns: 5000 mg/kg; endrīns: 5000 mg/kg heptahlors: 5000 mg/kg; heksahlorbenzols: 5000 mg/kg; mirekss: 5000 mg/kg; toksafens: 5000 mg/kg; polihlorbifenili (PCB)[?] 50 mg/kg DDT -2,2-bis-(4-hlorfenil)etāns 5000 mg/kg; hlordekons: 5000 mg/kg; polihlordibenz-p-dioksīni un dibenzfurāni (PCDD/PCDF)[?] 5 mg/kg; heksahlorcikloheksāna (HCH) alfa-, beta- un gamma- izomēru summārais saturs 5000 mg/kg; heksabrombifenils: 5000 mg/kg | Pastāvīga glabāšana tikai drošos, dziļos, pazemes cieto iežu veidojumos, sāls raktuvēs, vai bīstamo atkritumu izgāztuvēs (ar nosacījumu, ka atkritumi ir sacietējuši vai stabilizēti, ja tas tehniski izdarāms, kā nepieciešams atkritumu klasificēšanai Lēmuma 2000/532/EK 19 03 apakšnodaļā), ar ko ir jāievēro Padomes Direktīvas 1999/31/EK[?] un Padomes Lēmuma 2003/33/EK[?] noteikumi un ar ko ir parādīts, ka videi vēlamāka ir izraudzītā darbība |10 01 | Atkritumi, kas radušies spēkstacijās un citās sadedzināšanas iekārtās (izņemot 19. pozīcijā minētos) |10 01 14 (*)4 | Līdzsadedzināšanas iekārtās radušies smagie pelni, izdedži un sodrēji, kas satur bīstamas vielas |10 01 16 (*) | Līdzsadedzināšanas iekārtās radušies vieglie pelni, kas satur bīstamas vielas |10 02 | Atkritumi, kas radušies dzelzs un tērauda ražošanā |10 02 07 (*) | Gāzu attīrīšanas cietie atkritumi, kas satur bīstamas vielas |10 03 | Atkritumi, kas radušies alumīnija termometalurģijā |10 03 04 (*) | Izdedži, kas radušies primārajā ražošanā |10 03 08 (*) | Sāļu sārņi, kas radušies sekundārajā ražošanā |10 03 09 (*) | Melnie izdedži, kas radušies sekundārajā ražošanā |10 03 19 (*) | Dūmgāzu putekļi, kas satur bīstamas vielas |10 03 21 (*) | Citas cietās daļiņas un putekļi, kas satur bīstamas vielas (ieskaitot putekļus no bumbu dzirnavām) |10 03 29 (*) | Sāļu sārņu un melno izdedžu apstrādē radušies atkritumi, kas satur bīstamas vielas |10 04 | Atkritumi, kas radušies svina termometalurģijā |10 04 01 (*) | Izdedži, kas radušies primārajā un sekundārajā ražošanā |10 04 02 (*) | Izdedži un apdedži, kas radušies primārajā un sekundārajā ražošanā |10 04 04 (*) | Dūmgāzu putekļi |10 04 05 (*) | Citas cietās daļiņas un putekļi |10 04 06 (*) | Gāzu attīrīšanā radušies cietie atkritumi |10 05 | Atkritumi, kas radušies cinka termometalurģijā |10 05 03 (*) | Dūmgāzu putekļi |10 05 05 (*) | Cietie atkritumi, kas radušies gāzu attīrīšanā |10 06 | Atkritumi, kas radušies vara termometalurģijā |10 06 03 (*) | Dūmgāzu putekļi |10 06 06 (*) | Gāzu attīrīšanā radušies cietie atkritumi |10 08 | Atkritumi, kas radušies citu krāsaino metālu termometalurģijā |10 08 08 (*) | Sāļu sārņi, kas radušies primārajā un sekundārajā ražošanā |10 08 15 (*) | Dūmgāzu putekļi, kas satur bīstamas vielas |10 09 | Atkritumi, kas radušies melno metālu izstrādājumu liešanā |10 09 09 (*) | Dūmgāzu putekļi, kas satur bīstamas vielas |16 | ATKRITUMI, KAS NAV MINĒTI CITUR |16 11 | Oderējuma un ugunsizturīgo materiālu atkritumi |16 11 01 (*) | Metalurģiskajos procesos izmantotais oderējums un ugunsizturīgie materiāli uz oglekļa bāzes, kas satur bīstamas vielas |16 11 03 (*) | Cits metalurģiskajos procesos izmantotais oderējums un ugunsizturīgie materiāli, kas satur bīstamas vielas |17 | BŪVNIECĪBĀ UN ĒKU NOJAUKŠANĀ RADUŠIES ATKRITUMI (IESKAITOT NO PIESĀRŅOTĀM VIETĀM IZŅEMTU AUGSNI) |17 01 | betons, ķieģeļi, flīzes un keramika |17 01 06 (*) | Betona, ķieģeļu, flīžu un keramikas maisījumi vai to atsevišķas daļas, kas satur bīstamas vielas |17 05 | Augsne, iekļaujot izrakto augsni no piesārņotām vietām, akmeņus un bagarēšanas grunti |17 05 03 (*) | Augsnes neorganiskā daļa un akmeņi, kas satur bīstamas vielas |17 09 | Citi būvdarbos un ēku nojaukšanā radušies atkritumi |17 09 02 (*) | Būvdarbu un ēku nojaukšanas atkritumi, kas satur PHB, izņemot PHB saturošas iekārtas |17 09 03 (*) | Citi būvdarbos un ēku nojaukšanā radušies atkritumi, kas satur bīstamas vielas |19 | ATKRITUMI, KAS RADUŠIES ATKRITUMU APSAIMNIEKOŠANAS IEKĀRTĀS, NOTEKŪDEŅU ATTĪRĪŠANAS IEKĀRTĀS, DZERAMĀ ŪDENS UN TEHNISKĀM VAJADZĪBĀM LIETOJAMĀ ŪDENS SAGATAVOŠANAS IEKĀRTĀS |19 01 | Atkritumi, kas radušies atkritumu sadedzināšanā vai pirolīzē |19 01 07 (*) | Gāzu attīrīšanā radušies cietie atkritumi |19 01 11 (*) | Smagie pelni un izdedži, kas satur bīstamas vielas |19 01 13 (*) | Vieglie pelni, kas satur bīstamas vielas |19 01 15 (*) | Sodrēji, kas satur bīstamas vielas |19 04 | Pārstikloti atkritumi un pārstiklošanas atkritumi |19 04 02(*) | Vieglie pelni un citi atkritumi, kas radušies dūmvadu gāzu attīrīšanā |19 04 03 (*) | Nepārstiklota cietā fāze |[1] OV L 158, 30.4.2004., 7. lpp. Labotā redakcija OV L 229, 25.6.2004., 5. lpp.[2] Padomes 1999. gada 26. aprīļa Direktīva 1999/31/EK par atkritumu poligoniem (OV L 182, 16.7.1999., 1.lpp.). Direktīvā jaunākie grozījumi izdarīti ar Regulu (EK) Nr. 1882/2003.[3] Padomes 2002. gada 19. decembra Lēmums 2003/33/EK ar ko nosaka kritērijus un procedūras atkritumu pieņemšanai poligonos saskaņā ar Direktīvas 1999/31/EK 16. pantu un II pielikumu (OV L 11, 16.1.2003., 27. lpp.).4 Visi ar zvaigznīti (*) atzīmētie atkritumi tiek uzskatīti par bīstamiem atkritumiem saskaņā ar Direktīvu 91/689/EEK par bīstamiem atkritumiem (OV L 337, 31. 12 .1991., 20.lpp. Direktīva grozīta ar Direktīvu 94/31/EK, OV L 168, 2. 7. 1991., 28. lpp.), un uz to attiecas minētās direktīvas noteikumi.[i] Robežas attiecas tikai uz bīstamo atkritumu noglabāšanas vietām.6 Attiecīgos gadījumos izmanto Eiropas standartos NE 12766-1 un NE 12766-2 noteikto aprēķinu metodi.7 Robeža aprēķināta kā PCDD un PCDF , izmantojot šādus toksiskuma ekvivalences koeficientus ( TEF ):PCDD | TEF |2,3,7,8-TeCDD | 1 |1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD | 1 |1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD | 0,1 |1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD | 0,1 |1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD | 0,1 |1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD | 0,01 |OCDD | 0,0001 |PCDF |2,3,7,8-TeCDF | 0,1 |1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF | 0,05 |2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF | 0,5 |1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF | 0,1 |1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF | 0,1 |1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF | 0,1 |2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF | 0,1 |1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF | 0,01 |1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF | 0,01 |


type: other

text:
handbalista anunturi extrageri japan doi tineri indragostiti portughezului cultul contra orgasm arafat troianul cristina dobre locatii ionut voicu audienta reclamatie milion accident coleg meserie aviator firea gand remy zabala ramas fonduri phare cozmin gusa salomon carmen tanase franci casier black frida inaltare gattuso austeritate sterling adrian mititelu prenatal naomi campbell marian vanghelie iernut vandalism hepatita b benta leroy candidatii drag membrii valcelele
 01:45 I-au pus in curte o grenada defensiva si un plic cu instructiuni. Da-ne 20.000 de dolari ca sa nu te aruncam
 01:45 Mon Cher aterizeaza la Alba Iulia. Investitiile in cercetare si inovare in Europa. Festivalul Filmului European 2018. Horoscop
 BASESCU SPARGE GHEAȚA in dosarul "GALA BUTE". Ce ȘEF al SRI a este implicat in dosarul lui UDREA Fost sef ANAF: Relaxarea fiscala nu mai rezista, este dezastru A treia greva masiva in primul an de Macron: Sectorul public din Franta se revolta impotriva planului guvernamental care vizeaza 120.000 de concedieri Detaliul sinistru legat de soferul care a provocat tragedia din Ungaria Taie o lamaie marunt si pune-o la congelator! Efectul ei iti poate salva viata! Romania, zguduita de seisme. Un nou CUTREMUR a avut loc Procurorul Mircea Negulescu a denuntat-o pe Laura Kovesi la Parchetul General - QMagazine Armata israeliana a bombardat tinte ale Hamas in Fasia Gaza Bolile care apar din cauza gandurilor negative DIICOT da explicatii despre cheltuielile in cazul Boldea: 25.000 lei, doar transportul si rapoartele de constatare RUSALII 2018. In ce zi pica Rusaliile si ce semnificatie are aceasta sarbatoare Cum sa faci cea mai buna omleta. 5 pasi simpli pentru un rezultat garantat Liviu Dragnea pleaca in ziua sentintei din dosarul angajarilor fictive intr-o vizita oficiala in Elvetia Femeia mutilata cu ciocanul de iubit se zbate intre viata si moarte Meghan Markle, prima aparitie oficiala ca ducesa de Sussex, la "garden party-ul" dedicat printului Charles
 Cronica Romana | Romania TV | Pro Sport | Madone | Ziarul Financiar | ComputerWorld Romania | Adevarul | Antena 1 | OnlineSport | Curierul National | Realitatea TV | SmartNews | ProTV | Go4IT | Realitatea Romaneasca | Ziare Mondene | CanCan | Catalin Tolontan | Evenimentul Zilei | Gazeta Sporturilor | Gazeta de agricultura | Ziarul Atac | Capital | Cotidianul | Jurnalul National | Gandul | Dilema Veche | Romania Libera | Libertatea | eInformatii | AgoraNews | Bursa | Money.ro | Mediafax | Click | Hit | Puterea | Antena3 | Income Magazine | Chip | Toate stirile
 Fotografii emotionante. A parasit apartamentul din Bucuresti cu regret. Isabelle Gullden a devenit istorie pentru CSM Bucuresti
 publicat 2018-05-17 21:30:02 (CanCan)
 Isabelle Gullden a devenit istorie pentru CSM Bucuresti. HANDBALISTA a parasit, joi, Romania si urmeaza sa-si continue cariera in Franta, la Brest Bretagne. Sportiva a parasit deja apartamentul in care a locuit pe durata contractului pe care l-a avut cu "tigroaicele". Pe contul personal de socializare, Isabelle Gullden a postat si trei fotografii emotionante. Una [...] The post Fotografii emotionante. A parasit apartamentul din Bucuresti cu regret.... ...continuare.
 EXCLUSIV Cristina Neagu, interviu DEVASTATOR dupa Final Four » Analiza chirurgicala: ce probleme sunt la CSM Bucuresti: "Luati exemplul Gyor-ului" + mesaj pentru "mancatorii de seminte, care nu si-au rupt picioarele niciodata"
 CSM Bucuresti a terminat pe locul trei Final Four-ul Ligii Campionilor la handbal feminin. Campioana României a pierdut semifinala cu Gyor, 20-26, si a câstigat finala mica, 31-30 cu Rostov Don. Cristina Neagu, cea mai buna HANDBALISTA a lumii, crede ca starea de instabilitate de pe banca tehnica a dus la fluctuatiile majore din joc. ... ...continuare.
 EXCLUSIV Cristina Neagu, interviu DEVASTATOR dupa Final Four » Analiza chirurgicala: ce probleme sunt la CSM Bucuresti: "Luati exemplu Gyor-ului" + mesaj pentru "mancatorii de seminte, care nu si-au rupt picioarele niciodata"
 publicat 2018-05-14 10:00:24 (Gazeta-Sporturilor)
 Cristina Neagu: In Romania, din victorie se face nunta si din infrangere inmormantare. Sunt dezamagita
 publicat 2018-05-13 19:00:29 (ProTV)
 HANDBALISTA Cristina Neagu a declarat duminica, dupa câstigarea medaliei de bronz în Liga Campionilor cu CSM Bucuresti, ca este frustrata si dezamagita ca nu a putut lupta pentru trofeu, ...continuare.
 Emotii inaintea Finalei Cupei EHF » Cea mai experimentata HANDBALISTA de la Craiova e optimista: "E un scor greu, dar putem intoarce!"
 publicat 2018-05-10 12:00:13 (Gazeta-Sporturilor)
 Valentina Elisei Ardean este cea mai experimentata HANDBALISTA de la Craiova. Joaca a cincea finala din cariera si vrea sa mai adauge înca un trofeu. Finala Cupei EHF: SCM Craiova - Kristiansand va avea loc vineri, ora 19:30 si va fi în direct la TV Digi Sport si liveTEXT pe GSP.ro. În tur, oltencele au pierdut, scor 22-26. La 35 de ani, Valentina Elisei Ardean a trait multe pe terenul de handbal. ... ...continuare.
 Paula Garcia Avila, la CSM Bistrita. HANDBALISTA spaniola a castigat Cupa Challange in 2015 Echipa feminina de handbal CSM Bistrita a perfectat primul transfer pentru sezonul viitor, cel al pivotului spaniol Paula Garcia Avila, a anuntat clubul ardelean pe Facebook. Iberica de 26 de ani si 1,80 inaltime a semnat un contract pe un an, [...] Post-ul Paula Garcia Avila, la CSM Bistrita. HANDBALISTA spaniola a... ...continuare.
 Mihaela Buzarnescu, refuzata de CSM Bucuresti. "Pentru Miki, nu s-au gasit bani"
 publicat 2018-05-02 15:00:12 (Libertatea)
 Mihaela Buzarnescu, refuzata de CSM Bucuresti. "Pentru Miki, nu s-au gasit bani". CSM Bucuresti aduna vedete din toate sporturilor, insa bugetul institutiei poate fi accesat doar de catre anumite sportive. Clubul Primariei are cea mai buna HANDBALISTA a lumii, Cristina Neagu, plus trei jucatoare si trei jucatori de tenis. S-au gasit fonduri pentru Dima, locul 423 ATP Colectia [...] Post-ul Mihaela Buzarnescu, refuzata de CSM Bucuresti. "Pentru... ...continuare.
 Cristina Neagu o ajuta pe HANDBALISTA Ada Iliescu sa supravietuiasca. Licitatie cu tricoul campioanei
 publicat 2018-04-26 14:30:15 (Libertatea)
 Cristina Neagu o ajuta pe HANDBALISTA Ada Iliescu sa supravietuiasca. Licitatie cu tricoul campioanei. Pe contul de Facebook "Handbalul Sport National" a aparut anuntul ca HANDBALISTA numarul 1 a lumii se implica intr-un caz umanitar, cel al handbalistei Ada Iliescu, care are nevoie urgenta de bani, pentru a se putea opera la coloana vertebrala. Suma necesara [...] Post-ul Cristina Neagu o ajuta pe ...continuare.
 Ce intalnire! Cea mai buna HANDBALISTA a lumii i-a marturisit secretul "exatlonistei" Diana Bulimar: "Nu am ratat nicio..."
 publicat 2018-04-25 13:00:03 (CanCan)
 Diana Bulimar, fosta campioana europeana la gimnastica de mai multe ori, dar si participant la show-ul Exatlon, din Republica Dominicana, a vizitat-o pe Cristina Neagu, cea mai buna HANDBALISTA a lumii, chiar la sala. Cele doua si-au vorbit amical, au zambit, iar Cristina i-a facut o marturisire Dianei. "Sa stii ca nu am ratat nicio [...] The post Ce intalnire! Cea mai buna HANDBALISTA a lumii i-a marturisit... ...continuare.
 Cristina Neagu vede CSM Bucuresti in finala Ligii Campionilor: "Gyor nu mai este sperietoarea din alte sezoane"
 publicat 2018-04-24 15:30:17 (Libertatea)
 Cristina Neagu vede CSM Bucuresti in finala Ligii Campionilor. Cea mai buna HANDBALISTA din lume a declarat, marti, ca adversara din semifinalele Final Four, formatia maghiara Gyori Audi ETO KC, nu mai este “sperietoarea” din sezoanele precedente si ca sansele calificarii in finala sunt egale. “Stim toti cine este Gyor. Actuala campioana a Europei joaca [...] Post-ul Cristina Neagu vede CSM Bucuresti in finala Ligii Campionilor:... ...continuare.
 HANDBALISTA Cristina Neagu, marturisiri despre scenele de violenta: "Nu am intervenit, pentru ca riscam sa devin si eu agresata"
 Sportiva Cristina Neagu, desemnata de trei ori cea mai buna HANDBALISTA a lumii, a marturisit ca a fost martora unor scene de violenta. Declaratiile sportivei au fost facute in cadrul unui eveniment despre violenta in scoli (bullying). "Nu mi s-a intamplat sa fiu agresata, dar am asistat la scene de bullying. Nu am stiut ce sa fac. Acasa, parintii imi spuneau sa nu intervin in astfel de cazuri, pentru ca riscam sa devin si eu agresata", a marturisit... ...continuare.
 Cristina Neagu e ambasador al campaniei anti-bullying. HANDBALISTA s-a alaturat unui proiect legat de prevenirea violentelor indreptate asupra copiilor
 publicat 2018-04-24 14:30:18 (Libertatea)
 De trei ori cea mai buna HANDBALISTA a lumii, Cristina Neagu e ambasador al campaniei anti-bullying. Sportiva s-a alaturat unui important proiect legat de prevenirea violentelor de orice fel indreptate asupra copiilor. "Vreau sa le transmit celor afectati de bullying ca nu sunt singuri", a spus HANDBALISTA la intalnirea cu initiatorii proiectului. Organizatorii traditionali ai [...] Post-ul Cristina Neagu e... ...continuare.
 HANDBALISTA Ada Iliescu mai are nevoie de 20.000 de lei pentru o operatie la coloana! Haideti sa-i dam o mana de ajutor
 publicat 2018-04-24 09:15:04 (CanCan)
 HANDBALISTA Ada Iliescu mai are nevoie de 20.000 de lei pentru o ultima interventie chirugicala, la nervul cervical. Sportiva sufera de o boala rara numita schwanoamele vestibulare, care ii afecteaza radacinile nervilor spinali. "Este ultima interventie, la nervul cervical, si, apoi, ma voi putea bucura de o viata normala", spune, increzatoare, Ada Iliescu, care ataseaza [...] The post HANDBALISTA Ada Iliescu... ...continuare.
 HANDBALISTA Ada Iliescu mai are nevoie de 20.000 de lei pentru o operatie la nivelul nervului cervical
 publicat 2018-04-23 22:00:22 (ProTV)
 HANDBALISTA Ada Iliescu mai are nevoie de 20.000 de lei pentru o ultima interventie chirugicala, la nervul cervical. Sportiva sufera de o boala rara numita schwanoamele vestibulare, care îi afecteaza radacinile nervilor spinali. ...continuare.
 HANDBALISTA Ada Iliescu mai are nevoie de 20.000 de lei, pentru operatia pe coloana vertebrala
 publicat 2018-04-16 12:30:14 (Libertatea)
 HANDBALISTA Ada Iliescu mai are nevoie de 20.000 de lei, pentru operatia pe coloana vertebrala. "Este ultima interventie, la nervul cervical, si, apoi, ma voi putea bucura de o viata normala", spune, increzatoare, Ada Iliescu, care ataseaza RMN-ul doveditor. Lumea sportului a fost sensibilizata de drama Adei Iliescu, dar banii necesari urmatoarelor interventii chirurgicale nu sunt suficienti, [...] Post-ul ...continuare.
 Ratusca cea frumoasa! Ana Maria Țicu este poreclita de coechipiere "Ratusca". Asa i-a ramas numele, dar nu ar vrea ca si suporterii sa o strige la fel
 publicat 2018-04-13 13:00:15 (Gazeta-Sporturilor)
 Cea mai buna marcatoare a celor de la SCM Craiova în partida din Turcia, cu Kastamonu, a fost centrul Ana Maria Țicu, 7 reusite. HANDBALISTA de 26 de ani e cea mai veche jucatoare din lotul Craiovei. A venit în 2011 de la Centrul National de Excelenta de la Rm. Vâlcea, împreuna cu colega sa, Andreea Ianasi Radoi. "Echipa tocmai promovase în prima liga. Aveam 19 ani, eram mici, dar între timp am crescut", spune... ...continuare.
 Detalii de ultima ora despre sportiva de 10 ani careia i-au fost smulse doua degete la bazin
 publicat 2018-04-04 20:45:04 (CanCan)
 A sarit de pe trambulina, dar si-a agatat doua degete intr-o zona unde erau imbinate doua tevi de inox. I-au fost smulse, iar micuta HANDBALISTA a ramas mutilata. Parintii copilei cer ca vinovatii sa plateasca pentru nenorocirea fiicei lor. Copila urma sa fie selectionata in echipa de juniori a nationalei Romaniei la handbal, spune tatal [...] The post Detalii de ultima ora despre sportiva de 10 ani careia i-au fost smulse doua degete la bazin... ...continuare.
 Viitor distrus pentru o tanara HANDBALISTA! A ramas fara doua degete la mana, dupa ce a sarit de pe o trambulina!
 publicat 2018-04-04 19:00:02 (Antena-1)
 O sportiva de numai zece ani a ramas fara doua degete la mana, dupa ce a sarit de pe o trambulina! Chiar daca nu a fost la prima saritura, din nefericire, mica HANDBALISTA si-a prins mana in zona in care erau imbinate doua tevi din inox si astfel i-au fost smulse, la propriu, doua degete! ...continuare.
 Nebunie! Anita Gorbicz si-a anuntat retragerea, iar ungurii au facut imediat un gest rar!
 publicat 2018-03-23 13:45:11 (Gazeta-Sporturilor)
 La aproape 35 de ani, pe care îi va împlini pe 13 mai, HANDBALISTA Anita Gorbicz a anuntat oficial ca nu va mai juca pentru ”nationala” Ungariei. Maghiarii au retras tricoul cu numarul 13. Meciul cu Olanda, disputat joi seara, la Gyor, a avut în prim-plan un alt eveniment. ... ...continuare.
 Isabelle Gullden pleaca de la CSM Bucuresti. HANDBALISTA suedeza a facut anuntul despartirii
 publicat 2018-03-15 16:30:37 (Libertatea)
 Isabelle Gullden pleaca de la CSM Bucuresti. HANDBALISTA suedeza se va desparti la vara de campioana Romaniei si va juca la formatia franceza Brest, a anuntat clubul din Capitala pe site-ul sau oficial. Coordonatorul de joc al CSM Bucuresti a refuzat prelungirea intelegerii cu clubul pentru urmatoarele sezoane, precizeaza sursa amintita. ”Am avut trei ani extraordinari [...] Post-ul Isabelle Gullden pleaca de la CSM Bucuresti. ...continuare.
 DESTIN CRUNT. O fosta JUCATOARE crescuta de Oltchim si care a evoluat la HCM Baia Mare a pierdut rapid lupta cu o BOALA nemiloasa
 publicat 2018-03-13 14:00:23 (Puterea)
 Doliu in handbalul romanesc. Fosta HANDBALISTA Alexandra Roua, care a evoluat a fost crescuta de Oltchim Ramnicu Valcea, si care a trecut pe la Muresul Targu Mures, dar mai ales pe la HCM Baia Mare, a decedat la doar 32 de ani, Alexandra Roua era fiica fostului mare portar al Oltchimului, Cristina Lada Roua, jucatoare care a facut parte din primele generatii de succes ale gruparii valcene. Cea poreclita "Piti" s-a stins din viata in urma unei boli... ...continuare.
 Tragedie in sportul romanesc! HANDBALISTA Alexandra Roua, fosta jucatoare de la Oltchim si HCM Baia Mare, a decedat la varsta de 32 de ani
 publicat 2018-03-13 13:15:02 (Antena-1)
 Fosta HANDBALISTA Alexandra Roua, care a evoluat la echipe ca Oltchim Ramnicu Valcea, Muresul Targu Mures si HCM Baia Mare, a decedat la varsta de 32 de ani, informeaza gsp.ro. ...continuare.
 Alexandra Roua, fosta jucatoare de handbal la Oltchim, a murit la 32 de ani!
 publicat 2018-03-13 12:45:02 (CanCan)
 Doliu in hanbalul din Ramnicu Valcea! Alexandra Roua, fosta jucatoare la Oltchim, Muresul Tg. Mures si HCM Baia Mare s-a stins din viata la numai 32 de ani! Fosta HANDBALISTA a fost rapusa de o boala incurabila, care a evoluat infiorator de rapid. Alexandra este fiica fostului mare portar al Oltchimului, Cristina Lada Roua, iar [...] The post Alexandra Roua, fosta jucatoare de handbal la Oltchim, a murit la 32 de ani! appeared first on Cancan.ro. ...continuare.
 Fosta HANDBALISTA Alexandra Roua a murit la doar 32 de ani! A fost rapusa de o boala necrutatoare
 Fosta HANDBALISTA Alexandra Roua a murit la doar 32 de ani! A fost rapusa de o boala necrutatoare, a anuntat voceavalcii.ro. Alexandra Roua, fosta HANDBALISTA la Oltchim Ramnicu Valcea, Muresul Targu Mures si HCM Baia Mare, a incetat din viata la doar 32 de ani. Fosta HANDBALISTA Alexandra Roua a murit la doar 32 de [...] Post-ul Fosta ...continuare.
 GALERIE FOTO Gest impresionant » Junioara care a adus apa in curtea unei familii greu incercata de soarta din Brasov
 publicat 2018-03-11 18:00:10 (Gazeta-Sporturilor)
 O adolescenta din Brasov a initiat un eveniment caritabil, pentru o familie greu încercata de soarta: sase copii fara mama si cu tatal având un picior amputat. La Patinoarul Olimpic din Brasov, Laura Constantin, o HANDBALISTA junioara din Brasov, a organizat împreuna cu colegii ei evenimentul caritabil "The Ice Wolves", în cadrul caruia spectatorii au putut vedea un meci demonstrativ între hocheistii seniori... ...continuare.
 GALERIE FOTO » HANDBALISTA care a adus apa in curtea unei familii nevoiase din Brasov!
 publicat 2018-03-11 17:45:10 (Gazeta-Sporturilor)
 O adolescenta din Brasov a initiat un eveniment caritabil, pentru o familie greu încercata de soarta: sase copii fara mama si cu tatal având un picior amputat La Patinoarul Olimpic din Brasov, Laura Constantin, o fata din Brasov, împreuna cu colegii ei, a organizat evenimentul caritabil "The Ice Wolves", în cadrul caruia spectatorii au putut vedea un meci demonstrativ între hocheistii seniori de la Corona si micutii de la centrul de copii ... ...continuare.
 GOLANIE. Concurs cu dedicatie la Federatia Romana de HANDBAL, supervizat si girat de MTS
 publicat 2018-03-09 10:30:28 (Puterea)
 La inceputul acestei saptamanii, mai exact pe 5 martie, Federatia Romana de Handbal (FRH), condusa de Alexandru Dedu (foto), posteaza pe site un anunt surprinzator privind organizarea unui "concurs pentru ocuparea postului de Secretar General de federatie" iar "proba scrisa se va sustine in data de 09.03.2018 ora 11,00". Practic, luni dupa pranz se anunta concursul si vineri deja se stie castigatorul, adica miroase de la o posta a aranjament pe fata. In realitate, acest concurs este o... ...continuare.
 Nora Mork s-a impacat cu federatia norvegiana de handbal, dupa difuzarea unor fotografii nud ale sportivei
 publicat 2018-03-01 11:45:27 (Libertatea)
 Nora Mork, vedeta handbalului feminin norvegian, a facut pace cu Federatia din tara sa, miercuri, dupa un scandal legat de difuzarea unor fotografii intime ale jucatoarei, informeaza AFP, citata de Agerpres. HANDBALISTA in varsta de 26 ani a fost deranjata de faptul ca federatia a reactionat cu intarziere dupa ce a fost informata ca unii [...] Post-ul Nora Mork s-a impacat cu federatia norvegiana de handbal, dupa difuzarea unor fotografii nud ale... ...continuare.
 GYOR-CSM BUCUREȘTI ONLINE STREAM LIVE VIDEO DIGISPORT TELEKOM SPORT. Meci infernal pentru Neagu
 publicat 2018-02-26 19:30:02 (Antena3)
 GYOR-CSM BUCUREȘTI ONLINE STREAM LIVE VIDEO DIGISPORT TELEKOM SPORT HANDBALISTA echipei CSM Bucuresti, Gnonsiane Niombla, a declarat, vineri, ca formatia sa este in forma si poate face un "meci mare" in deplasare... ...continuare.
 HANDBALISTA Ada Iliescu, operatie la coloana vertebrala. Va fi a treia interventie, dupa cele de la cap, in 2016, si de la coloana, in 2017
 publicat 2018-02-26 17:45:29 (Libertatea)
 HANDBALISTA Ada Iliescu va s operatie la coloana vertebrala. Va fi a treia interventie, dupa cele de la cap, pe 6 aprilie 2016, si de la coloana, in 20 noiembrie 2017. Operatia este programata in luna mai a acestui an, iar sportive are nevoie de suport financiar. La cea mai recenta interventie chirurgicala, costurile au fost [...] Post-ul HANDBALISTA Ada Iliescu, operatie la coloana vertebrala. Va fi a treia... ...continuare.


type: wikipedia

text:
Les Suku sont une population d'Afrique centrale vivant dans le sud-ouest de la République démocratique du Congo, également en Angola.
 Ethnonymie
 Selon les sources et le contexte, on observe plusieurs formes : Basuku, Bayaka, Soukou, Suko, Sukus, Wasuku.
 Histoire
 Les régions des peuples Suku se situent à la frontière entre la République Démocratique du Congo (ex Zaïre) et l'Angola
 Les Suku peu nombreux ( à individus) peuplent deux petites régions s'étend sur les plateaux dominant les vallées fluviales très encaissées qui caractérisent toute cette partie située entre le fleuve Congo et la rivière Kwilu. (Les Suku et les Yaka se sont scindés suite à chute de l’empire Lunda-Chokwe au . Les suku rassemblent aujourd’hui environ personnes.)
 Si les langues des Yaka et des Suku sont différentes, ils ont une culture très proche car les populations sont vraiment en contact les unes des autres.
 Ils possèdent les mêmes institutions, la même typologie d'objets et partagent le même environnement.
 Historiquement ces deux peuples sont liés depuis le avec le souvenir vivace d'appartenance à une même terre d'origine.
 Ils se sont en effet déplacés depuis le pays Lunda et ont migré vers le Nord afin de fuir une soumission aux Lunda.
 Leur société est très structurée avec, pour la famille, une segmentation en lignage dont le chef exerce une réelle autorité (jusqu'au droit de vie et de mort).
 Leur organisation politique est aussi pyramidale du village au chef de plusieurs villages, au chef de région jusqu'au chef suprême (le Kyambko chez les Yaka et le Menikongo chez les Suku) auquel on doit tribut.
 De par la proximité de ces peuples et de leur culture, il sera intéressant d'examiner des statuettes de divination et plus encore les masques liés aux sociétés d'initiation (semblables dans leurs pratiques) : le nkanda chez les Yaka et le mukanda chez les Suku.
 Langue
 Ils parlent le suku, une langue bantoue, dont le nombre de locuteurs était estimé à en 1980.
 Culture
 Culturellement ils sont très proches des Yakas. Leurs figures en bois sculpté – par l'intermédiaire desquelles ils honorent les ancêtres –, de même que leurs masques-heaumes sont réputés.
 Notes et références
 Voir aussi
 Bibliographie
 Arthur Paul Bourgeois, Nkanda related sculpture of the Yaka and Suku of Southwestern Zaire, Indiana University, 1979 (thèse).
 Arthur Paul Bourgeois, Art of the Yaka and Suku, A. et F. Chaffin, Meudon, 1984, 271 p.
 Bulundu Bayekula et Pelende Mahungu, Il mit du poison dans le vin de ses frères : mythes suku, Ceeba publications, Bandundu, 1976, 152 p.
 Elle partit avec une calebasse trouée : récits de littérature : kwese, ngongo, suku, Ceeba, Bandundu, 1974, 193 p.
 Tumina Kikusa, Fils, on n'épouse pas sa sœur ! : mythes suku, Ceeba Publications, Bandundu, 1974, 111 p.
 Igor Kopytoff, Extension of conflict as a method of conflict resolution among the Suku of the Congo, Ann Arbor, 1961
 Igor Kopytoff, « Knowledge and belief in Suku thought », Africa, 51, 3, 1981, p. 709-723
 François Lamal, Essai d'étude démographique d'une population du Kwango : les Basuku du territoire de Feshi, Georges Van Campenhout, Bruxelles, 1949, 189 p.
 François Lamal, Basuku et Bayaka des districts Kwango et Kwilu au Congo, Musée royal de l'Afrique centrale, Tervuren (Belgique), 1965, 323 p.
 Mbuluku Masoka Jean-Valère, Liberté, nécessité et ethnicité : essai d'anthropologie suku, Université de Fribourg (Suisse), 1987, 365 p.
 Kika Mavunda, L'Elevage des bovins et le développement socio-économique chez les Suku du Kwango-Kwilu au Zaire, Université de Dijon, 1974, 108 p. (DES de sciences économiques)
 Klaus Weiland, La Chefferie suku de Mobanga : son organisation sous l'angle du système de parenté, École pratique des hautes études (Paris), 1976, 426 p. (mémoire)
 Articles connexes
 Liste des groupes ethniques d'Afrique
 Démographie de la République démocratique du Congo
 Démographie en Angola
 Liens externes
 Suku Information (Arts & Life in Africa, Université de l'Iowa)
 Yaka et Suku sur Détours du Monde
 Groupe ethnique en république démocratique du Congo
 Groupe ethnique en Angola


type: caselaw

jurisdiction: EU

text:
 21.7.2012
 SV
 Europeiska unionens officiella tidning
 C 217/26
 Talan väckt den 22 maj 2012 — Micrus Endovascular mot harmoniseringsbyrån — Laboratorios Delta (DELTA)
 (Mål T-218/12)
 2012/C 217/55
 Rättegångsspråk: engelska
 Parter
 Sökande: Micrus Endovascular LLC (Wilmington, Förenade staterna) (ombud: B. Brandreth, barrister)
 Svarande: Byrån för harmonisering inom den inre marknaden (varumärken, mönster och modeller) (harmoniseringsbyrån)
 Motpart vid överklagandenämnden: Laboratorios Delta Lda (Quelouz, Portugal)
 Yrkanden
 Sökanden yrkar att tribunalen ska
 —
 ogiltigförklara det beslut som meddelades av harmoniseringsbyråns andra överklagandenämnd den 6 mars 2012 i ärende R 244/2011-2, och
 —
 förplikta svaranden att ersätta sökandens kostnader vid överklagandenämnden och tribunalen.
 Grunder och huvudargument
 Sökande av gemenskapsvarumärke: Sökanden.
 Sökt gemenskapsvarumärke: Ordmärket DELTA för varor i klass 10 — ansökan om registrering som gemenskapsvarumärke nr 6655906.
 Innehavare av det varumärke eller kännetecken som åberopats som hinder för registrering i invändningsförfarandet: Motparten vi överklagandenämnden.
 Varumärke eller kännetecken som åberopats: Den internationella varumärkesregistreringen nr 131374 av figurmärket DELTA PORTUGAL för varor i klass 5, den portugisiska varumärkesregistreringen nr 140578 av figurmärket DELTA PORTUGAL för varor i klass 5, och det registrerade firmanamnet nr 23113 LABORATORIOS DELTA.
 Invändningsenhetens beslut: Bifall till invändningen.
 Överklagandenämndens beslut: Avslag på överklagandet.
 Grunder: Åsidosättande av artikel 8.1 b i rådets förordning nr 207/2009.


jurisdiction: US

text:
 205 Md. 380 (1954)
 109 A.2d 110
 MAHONEY
 v.
 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ELECTIONS OF TALBOT COUNTY ET AL.
 [No. 66, October Term, 1954 (Adv.).]
 Court of Appeals of Maryland.
 Decided August 25, 1954.
 Opinion filed November 12, 1954.
 *384 The cause was argued before BRUNE, C.J., and DELAPLAINE, COLLINS and HAMMOND, JJ.
 Francis B. Burch and Hyman A. Pressman, with whom were William W. Mahoney and J. Thomas Clark on the brief, for the appellant.
 William C. Walsh, Benjamin C. Howard and Ralph W. Powers for the intervenor.
 Submitted on brief by Charles E. Wheeler and Walter W. Claggett for the Board of Supervisors of Elections of Talbot County.
 Decided, per curiam, August 25, 1954.
 BRUNE, C.J., delivered the opinion of the Court.
 This is the second appeal in this case. On the day following its argument in this Court we filed a per curiam order affirming the judgment of the Circuit Court for Talbot County which denied and dismissed the appellant's petition for a writ of mandamus after a full hearing on the merits.
 The case (together with a companion case arising in Queen Anne's County) first came before us on an appeal from an order sustaining a demurrer to the appellant's petition incorporated in the answer of the Supervisors of Election of Talbot County (usually referred to below as the "Supervisors") and a demurrer filed by the intervening respondent, Dr. H.C. Byrd, the appellant's opponent for the Democratic Party's nomination for Governor in the primary election held on June 28, 1954. By a per curiam order, since followed by the full opinion *385 of this Court, we reversed the order sustaining the demurrers. The facts of the case up to that stage of the controversy are fully stated in the opinion written by Judge Delaplaine (Mahoney v. Supervisors of Elections of Queen Anne's County, Mahoney v. Supervisors of Elections of Talbot County, 205 Md. 325, 108 A.2d 143) and will not be repeated here.
 Following the remand of the case the Supervisors filed an amended answer and the intervenor filed an answer to the petition. The petitioner joined issue and traversed the answer, and the Supervisors and the intervenor demurred to the traverse. These demurrers were overruled and the case went to trial on the merits.
 During the hearing 289 challenged ballots which had been segregated during the recount were introduced in evidence, and 35 of them were not then objected to by either side, thus reducing the number of challenged ballots to 254. The ballots were divided into classes or types designated by letters from A to P, inclusive, depending upon the principal type of objection asserted against them, all of which are described, and many of which are illustrated, in the painstaking and comprehensive opinion of the trial court. (At the hearing there proved to be no ballots classified as belonging to Type C (a check mark) or Type H (shaded), both of which Types were described in the appellant's petition.) Where any ballot was claimed to be defective in more than one respect, the additional defect or defects were noted.
 The trial court reviewed all of the challenged ballots, some of which had been cast for Mr. Mahoney and most of which had been cast for Dr. Byrd. The recount had shown a total of 1826 votes counted for Dr. Byrd and 1769 counted for Mr. Mahoney. As a result of the trial court's review of the ballots, 16 votes cast for Dr. Byrd and 12 cast for Mr. Mahoney were eliminated. This reduced the majority for Dr. Byrd from 57 as returned by the Supervisors to 53, but did not change the result of the election. Hence, the writ of mandamus did not issue.
 *386 The law applicable to the merits of this case was indicated in our previous opinion. We recognized that relief by way of mandamus is available for the correction of a clear legal error on the part of the Board of Supervisors. (Hammond v. Love, 187 Md. 138, 49 A.2d 75.) We also recognized that the provision of Code (1951), Article 33, Section 85, for the rejection of ballots on which there may be any mark "other than the cross-mark in a square opposite the name of a candidate" is mandatory. However, our opinion also made it clear that the quoted phrase is not to be construed absolutely literally, for we said: "The test for determining the validity of a ballot is that when an irregularity in the marking of a cross-mark apparently occurred accidentally and in pursuance of the voter's purpose to make a cross-mark as prescribed by the statute, the votes on the ballot should be counted; but when the irregularity was apparently placed on the ballot intentionally and constituted a means of identifying the ballot, the ballot should be rejected."
 Almost since the first enactment by the Laws of 1901 (Special Session), Chapter 2, Section 66, of the provision quoted, it has not been construed with literal narrowness.
 It is true that in Duvall v. Miller, 94 Md. 697, 51 A. 570, some rather sweeping language was used with regard to literal compliance with the text of the then very recently enacted statute. Even that opinion was by a divided Court (4-3) on the validity of ballots on which the end of a cross-mark extended beyond the square; and in less than a year thereafter, in Coulehan v. White, 95 Md. 703, 53 A. 786, which is briefly reviewed and summarized in our previous opinion in this case, a more liberal view was taken and some marks not within the square opposite the name of a candidate were held not to invalidate the ballots on which they appeared. It may be noted that of the four Judges who constituted the majority on the point on which this Court divided in Duvall v. Miller, three (including the writer of the *387 Duvall opinion) concurred in the per curiam opinion in Coulehan v. White, and the fourth did not sit in the latter case. Judge Boyd, who was of the minority in Duvall v. Miller, wrote the opinion of the trial court in Coulehan v. White. This opinion was adopted without dissent and with only one change by the Court of Appeals. That one change involved a construction of the opinion in Duvall v. Miller and held valid some ballots which the trial court had rejected on its interpretation of the Duvall case.
 Since the Coulehan case the statute has been amended and liberalized. Chapter 576 of the Laws of 1908 liberalized it in two ways, one of which was to validate ballots of a kind held invalid in Duvall v. Miller and Coulehan v. White because a cross-mark extended beyond the lines of a square. On the other hand, there was then, and there has been since then, no narrowing by legislation of any of the several liberal and non-literal constructions adopted in the Coulehan case. The repeal and re-enactment of the statute without changing the language applicable to these constructions indicates a legislative acceptance of them. Sonnenburg v. Monumental Motor Tours, 198 Md. 227, 81 A.2d 617; Dept. of Tidewater Fisheries v. Sollers, 201 Md. 603, 95 A.2d 306; Nutwell v. Supervisors of Elections of Anne Arundel County, 205 Md. 338, 108 A.2d 149.
 The principal contention of the appellant is, in substance, that the Supervisors have discretion only to determine the fact of the existence of a mark (not due to an imperfection in the paper or to a like cause) other than the cross-mark in a square opposite the name of the candidate. This, we think, is too narrow a view of the discretion confided to the Supervisors. It would push the rule of Hammond v. Love, supra, too far.
 Our previous opinion in this case expressly recognized that the Supervisors, "in making a recount of votes, are vested with discretion in determining whether a ballot should be counted or rejected," and we further said: "We reaffirm the rule that where the Election Supervisors *388 have not acted in violation of law, their action in counting or rejecting ballots cast in a primary election is not subject to review by mandamus in the absence of fraud or arbitrary conduct. White v. Laird, 127 Md. 120, 96 A. 318; Fitzgerald v. Quinn, 159 Md. 543, 151 A. 660; Roe v. Weir, 181 Md. 26, 28 A.2d 471. On the contrary, where a Board of Election Supervisors has made an obvious mistake of law in counting or rejecting ballots, the court has the power to correct such mistake."
 The opinion of the learned trial judge upon which his rulings with respect to the various challenged ballots were based, was in accordance with these views. He said: "To sum it all up succinctly, this Court believes that in the absence of improper motives on the part of the Supervisors, or a charge of fraud or actual arbitrary conduct, a Court of Law will not substitute its judgment for that of the Supervisors by granting a Mandamus compelling the Supervisors to reject certain ballots and count others, provided the Supervisors do nothing which is clearly contrary to law." He then proceeded to review each of the challenged ballots and set forth his conclusions with respect to each class and the ballots comprised therein.
 The case was tried by agreement of the parties without a jury; and on appeal, the question before us is whether or not on the law and the facts the writ should have issued. Whitridge v. Pope, 110 Md. 486, 73 A. 288; Woods v. Simpson, 146 Md. 547, 126 A. 882; Strott v. Broening, 160 Md. 560, 154 A. 45; Schriver v. Mayor & City Council of Cumberland, 169 Md. 286, 181 A. 443; Hecht v. Crook, 184 Md. 271, 40 A.2d 673.
 We have already expressed our agreement with the general rules of law set forth in the opinion of the trial court, and the care and thoroughness of its opinion in dealing with each class of alleged defects and with individual ballots have greatly facilitated our review.
 As a general observation, we may note that every one of the types of objection noted by the appellant was of a kind with respect to which the Supervisors were required *389 to exercise their judgment and which called for a determination of fact. Their exercise of judgment has been reviewed by the trial court; and with regard to the vast majority of the challenged ballots, that court has found the evidence insufficient to warrant the conclusion that the Supervisors acted clearly illegally in determining to count the ballots in question. We repeat what we said in our earlier opinion in this case  that there is no statutory right of appeal from the Supervisors to a court for a recount of votes in a primary election. Judicial review is available in such cases only through mandamus proceedings and where, as here, there is no charge of fraud, only to redress clearly arbitrary or illegal action. Where the error is obvious and the facts are beyond dispute, as in Hammond v. Love, supra, this involves no great delay in ascertaining the result of a primary election. On the other hand, the practical difficulties where paper ballots are still in use inherent in the application or extension of the doctrine of Hammond v. Love to the determination of controverted factual details committed to the Supervisors of Elections for decision in the exercise of their discretionary powers, require little, if any elaboration. The time needed for the determination of the result of the primary election contest which gave rise to this case (and others) points them up. That election was held on June 28th and our per curiam decision on the merits of this case (which did end the contest) was filed on August 25, 1954. Little time was then left before the date fixed for the mailing of absentee ballots for the general election. How much longer another case which, we were informed, would have followed this one if the judgment of the trial court had been reversed, would have delayed the determination of the outcome of this election is problematical. So is the time which might have been needed for the conclusion of this case, in which, we were told, the intervenor, Dr. Byrd, would have sought, in the event of reversal, to obtain a review of many ballots cast for his opponent and not previously challenged.
 *390 The preservation of the secrecy of the ballot is, of course, entirely necessary and proper. So are the reasonably prompt determination of the result of a primary election and the avoidance of the unnecessary disfranchisement of voters due to minor errors or irregularities in marking their ballots. See White v. Laird, 127 Md. 120, at 126, 96 A. 318, at 320, where the danger of overrefinements of objections to ballots was clearly pointed out.
 Where issues of fact have been honestly considered by Supervisors of Elections and their decisions have stood the test of thorough review by a trial court, the burden of showing that the action of the Supervisors has been clearly illegal is not a light one.
 Because of the dangers pointed out in White v. Laird, supra, we are reluctant to add unnecessarily to the lore of Coulehan v. White, supra, and we shall accordingly deal only briefly with most of the grounds of alleged invalidity of the ballots challenged in this case.
 Type A comprises seventy-five ballots in all, of which two were rejected  one for each candidate. Ballots in this Type involve a dot and occasionally some other mark or marks in the square with the cross-mark. These are similar to Class 20 of the challenged ballots in the Coulehan case, and ballots of this type were rejected in that case. The action of the Supervisors in counting these ballots, we think, was within the discretionary power vested in them.
 Type B consists of ballots on which there is a dot, but not a cross-mark, in a square. Of the thirteen held properly counted six were considered as due to flaws in the paper, and this ruling is clearly correct. The trial court found that the other seven may have been pencil marks and that four of them (if so) were inadvertently made. Because of uncertainty as to their nature, they would all seem to fall within the Supervisors' power of determination; and the four last mentioned would also be within the spirit of the ruling as to Class 21 of the Coulehan case and the inadvertent "dragged line" ballot *391 upheld in Landover Hills v. Brandt, 199 Md. 105, 85 A.2d 449.
 Type C was non-existent; the one ballot in Class D was held valid under the Landover Hills case, and the appellant abandoned his objection to it in this Court.
 Type E was described as comparable to Class 10 in the Coulehan case and as involving more lines than are needed for a cross. Ten ballots were rejected and eighteen were counted. These eighteen were found by the trial court to show efforts by nervous persons to retrace one or both lines of a cross-mark. Accordingly, they seem to resemble Class 9 of the Coulehan case and to have been properly counted.
 Type F contained only one ballot, which showed a "dragged line". The trial court found that it resembled Type D and could have been so designated. It was accordingly properly counted.
 Type G was similar to Class 27 of the Coulehan case and involved a third line, which produced somewhat of an "H" rather than a cross-mark. This Class was not ruled on in the Coulehan case (where there was one for each side). The trial court rejected all seven that were clearly H's and two others which were really stars, like Type E. Of the others twenty were found by the trial court to involve "unquestionably honest attempts to retrace one or both lines of the cross to make them more distinct by persons untrained in the use of writing instruments * * *." While there was found to be "room for reasonable doubts as to many of them," the trial court held that such doubts should be resolved in favor of the voter and that it could not find that the Supervisors had improperly counted them. This holding was in accordance with the ruling as to similar marks in Class 9 of the Coulehan case and the spirit of giving the voter the benefit of the doubt as was done with respect to Classes 12 and 21 in the Coulehan case. This, we think, was proper.
 Of the remaining eight ballots which were counted, five were found to be "honest efforts to complete an arm *392 of the cross," and three to show a dragging of pencils. Under the rulings with regard to Class 9 of the Coulehan case and the Landover Hills case, the holding of the trial court was correct with regard to these eight ballots.
 There was no ballot of Type H (described as "shaded").
 Type I, resembling Class 11 of the Coulehan case, which may be described briefly as a cross having only three complete sides or legs instead of four, consisted of three ballots, all of which the trial court held properly counted. We find no error in this holding, which is supported by the Coulehan case.
 Type J, illustrated in the petition as a double cross, "X X", consisted of eight ballots. The trial court found that all of these ballots involved honest attempts to retrace one or both lines of the cross-mark, as in Types E and G. What has been said with regard to those Types is therefore applicable, and the ruling of the trial court in holding them properly counted is approved.
 Type K embraces a somewhat miscellaneous group of forty-eight ballots. One ballot (marked for the appellant) was not counted because it was conceded at the hearing to be invalid, though the reason for its invalidity was not clear to the trial judge and he thought it had been properly counted by the Supervisors. The appellant's brief states that the ballot was invalid because of a small line in the Attorney General box. The appellant further says that it was no worse than marks on other ballots which the trial court held were properly counted. The trial court found that eight of the remaining "Type K" ballots involved extensions of one or both cross-marks made "without design", three involved "retracings" and thirty-five involved "faint dragged lines." We find no error in the trial court's holdings that ballots so marked were properly counted.
 Type L, described as "erasures", contained only one ballot. The trial court found that the alleged erasure was not an erasure at all, but was due to a wet pencil mark evidently caused by the voter's effort to overcome *393 a difficulty due to a flaw in the paper. We find no error in this ruling.
 Type M is a kind of catch-all designation for "other marks" on the face of ballots. Ballots in this group are objected to on varied grounds which include two retracings, four insignificant dots difficult to locate, six offset impressions of a wet pencil mark made in folding the ballot, six wavering dragged lines, one faint red smudge made with lipstick or nail polish, two creases in the paper and two punctures of the ballot. Of the last type, one ballot was rejected because the largeness of a pencil dot piercing the paper and the presence of a contiguous smudge would make identification relatively easy, and the other ballot was passed because it was evidently the result of a pencil point breaking. The faint red smudge might be found to fall under Class 23 of the Coulehan case (a long pencil mark apparently due to a slip of the pencil) or under Class 18 (ink on the back of the ballot which "probably" got there during the count of the ballots). We do not think that we should overturn the judgment of the Supervisors or the ruling of the trial court as to how this mark should be treated, nor is there any reason why a supposed mark which turns out to be due to a crease in the paper should cause the rejection of a ballot. Impressions made by a wet pencil mark were held not to invalidate ballots under Class 19 of the Coulehan case. Insignificant dots difficult to locate seem within the principle of Class 4 of the Coulehan case  lines extending almost imperceptibly beyond the square. Retracings and dragged lines are covered by what we have said under Types G and D.
 Type N, which includes eleven ballots, is a catch-all for other marks on the back of ballots. Five smudges or lines made "without design" with lipstick, nail polish or possibly a red pencil are covered by what we have said with regard to a red line on the face of a ballot under Type M. The two ballots where incomplete numbers were below the initials of the judge of elections, the ballot where an accidental mark in the same color *394 as the initials of a judge appeared below them, the ballot where there was an ink spot on the portion of a coupon not torn off and the ballot with "red ink spots only" seem within either the precise holding or the principle applied to a Class 18 ballot in the Coulehan case, where a mark due to manifest accident was held not to invalidate a ballot. A "faint pencil `dragged line' so inconspicuous that it took the Court several minutes to find it" seems to have been properly held not to invalidate the ballot. Compare the reasoning which upheld the validity of Class 4 ballots in the Coulehan case (lines extending almost imperceptibly beyond the square).
 Type O, allegedly improper initials, covers two ballots. One was rejected; the other was held valid after taking the testimony of the particular judge of elections involved and a comparison of the allegedly improper initials with undoubtedly genuine initials of the same judge. Again we find no error in this ruling.
 Type P is described as a "tear." It appears to have occurred in the tearing off of a coupon. A part of the initials of the judge of elections was torn off along with the coupon. We see no error in counting this ballot. Compare Coulehan Class 18 and the acceptance in that case of all of the ballots in one ward where the judge of elections put his initials on the coupon and they were torn off along with the coupon.
 In a number of instances more than one objection was presented to the counting of a particular ballot. The challenged ballots were placed in the classification covering the principal objection, but any secondary objections were also noted.
 As to such secondary objections to ballots classified as Type A the trial court said: "These alleged defects were also reviewed, but they do not appear to invalidate the ballots in question." Secondary objections to ballots classified under other Types were variously stated by the trial court to have been reviewed, examined or considered and "ignored". We understand the trial court's use of the word "ignored" to be equivalent to what was *395 said at greater length with regard to secondary objections to ballots classified as Type A. Any other meaning would be inconsistent with their having been reviewed, examined or considered.
 In summary, the result adverse to the petitioner-appellant at which we have arrived on this appeal, as against the result favorable to him at which we arrived on the previous appeal on the demurrers, is due to the difference between the allegations which stood admitted by the demurrers on the first appeal and the proof developed at the hearing on the merits which is before us on this appeal. The evidence, we think, shows that in making the recount the Supervisors discharged their duties conscientiously and to the best of their ability. It fails, we think, to establish that in the exercise of the discretion confided to them to determine whether or not the challenged ballots should be counted, the Supervisors so clearly fell into error as to show that their decisions were contra to law or unsupported in fact so as to be "clearly illegal." If there were any such errors, they were too few in number to alter the result of the election. Accordingly, we affirmed the order denying the petition.


type: contracts

text:
 Avis juridique important
 |
 22004D0009
 Gemensamma EES-kommitténs beslut nr 9/2004 av den 6 februari 2004 om ändring av bilaga XI (Teletjänster) och protokoll 37 till EES-avtalet
 Europeiska unionens officiella tidning nr L 116 , 22/04/2004 s. 0056 - 0057
 Gemensamma EES-kommitténs beslutnr 9/2004av den 6 februari 2004om ändring av bilaga XI (Teletjänster) och protokoll 37 till EES-avtaletGEMENSAMMA EES-KOMMITTÉN HAR BESLUTAT FÖLJANDEmed beaktande av avtalet om Europeiska ekonomiska samarbetsområdet, ändrat genom protokollet med justeringar av avtalet om Europeiska ekonomiska samarbetsområdet (nedan kallat "avtalet") särskilt artiklarna 98 och 101 i detta, ochav följande skäl:(1) Bilaga XI till avtalet ändrades genom Gemensamma EES-kommitténs beslut nr 153/2003 av den 7 november 2003(1).(2) Protokoll 37 till avtalet ändrades genom Gemensamma EES-kommitténs beslut nr 32/2003 av den 14 mars 2003(2).(3) Kommissionens beslut 2002/622/EG av den 26 juli 2002 om upprättande av en grupp för radiospektrumpolitik(3) bör införlivas med avtalet.(4) För att avtalet skall fungera tillfredsställande bör protokoll 37 till avtalet utvidgas till att omfatta den grupp för radiospektrumpolitik som upprättats genom beslut 2002/622/EG och, bilaga XI bör ändras för att fastställa förfarandena för att medverka i denna grupp.HÄRIGENOM FÖRESKRIVS FÖLJANDE.Artikel 11. Följande punkt skall införas efter punkt 5cg (kommissionens direktiv 2002/77/EG) i bilaga XI till avtalet:"5ch. 32002 D 0622: Kommissionens beslut 2002/622/EG av den 26 juli 2002 om upprättande av en grupp för radiospektrumpolitik (EGT L 198, 27.7.2002, s. 49).Förfaranden för Liechtensteins, Islands och Norges medverkan enligt artikel 101 i avtalet:Varje Efta-stat får i enlighet med artikel 3 i kommissionens beslut 2002/622/EG utse företrädare som skall delta som observatörer i mötena i gruppen för radiospektrumpolitik.EG-kommissionen skall i tid meddela deltagarna datumen för kommitténs möten och vidarebefordra relevanta upplysningar.".2. Följande punkt skall införas i protokoll 37 (som innehåller den förteckning som avses i artikel 101) till avtalet:"16. Gruppen för radiospektrumpolitik (kommissionens beslut 2002/622/EG).".Artikel 2Texterna till beslut 2002/622/EG på isländska och norska, som skall offentliggöras i EES-supplementet till Europeiska unionens officiella tidning, skall vara giltiga.Artikel 3Detta beslut träder i kraft den 7 februari 2004, under förutsättning att alla anmälningar enligt artikel 103.1 i avtalet har gjorts till Gemensamma EES-kommittén(4).Artikel 4Detta beslut skall offentliggöras i EES-delen av och EES-supplementet till Europeiska unionens officiella tidning.Utfärdat i Bryssel den 6 februari 2004.På gemensamma EES-kommitténs vägnarP. WesterlundOrdförande(1) EUT L 41, 12.2.2004, s. 45.(2) EUT L 137, 5.6.2003, s. 32.(3) EGT L 198, 27.7.2002, s. 49.(4) Inga konstitutionella krav angivna.


text:
 Avis juridique important
 |
 22002D0005
 Gemensamma EES-kommitténs beslut nr 5/2002 av den 1 februari 2002 om ändring av bilaga XIII (Transport) till EES-avtalet
 Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning nr L 088 , 04/04/2002 s. 0009 - 0011
 Gemensamma EES-kommitténs beslutnr 5/2002av den 1 februari 2002om ändring av bilaga XIII (Transport) till EES-avtaletGEMENSAMMA EES-KOMMITTÉN HAR FATTAT DETTA BESLUTmed beaktande av avtalet om Europeiska ekonomiska samarbetsområdet, i dess lydelse enligt protokollet med justeringar av avtalet om Europeiska ekonomiska samarbetsområdet, nedan kallat avtalet, särskilt artikel 98 i detta, ochav följande skäl:(1) Bilaga XIII till avtalet ändrades genom Gemensamma EES-kommitténs beslut nr 158/2001 av den 11 december 2001(1).(2) Rådets direktiv 93/89/EEG av den 25 oktober 1993 om medlemsstaternas tillämpning av skatter på vissa fordon som används för godstransporter på väg och tullar och avgifter för användningen av vissa infrastrukturer(2) införlivades med avtalet genom Gemensamma EES-kommitténs beslut nr 7/94(3).(3) Europeiska gemenskapernas domstol ogiltigförklarade rådets direktiv 93/89/EEG den 5 juli 1995.(4) Verkningarna av direktiv 93/89/EEG upprätthölls inom Europeiska gemenskaperna till dess att rådet hade antagit ett nytt direktiv.(5) Europaparlamentets och rådets direktiv 1999/62/EG av den 17 juni 1999 om avgifter på tunga godsfordon för användningen av vissa infrastrukturer(4) antogs därför.(6) Direktiv 1999/62/EG bör införlivas med avtalet.(7) Direktiv 93/89/EEG bör därför utgå ur avtalet.(8) Mot bakgrund av det norska vägsystemets särskilda egenskaper får Norge ta ut tullar och avgifter för fordon på ett större antal kategorier av vägar än vad som fastställs i direktivet.(9) Enligt vad som fastställs i det avtal om landtransport med Europeiska gemenskapen som undertecknades den 21 juni 1999 införde Schweiz från och med den 1 januari 2001 en avgift för tunga fordon (vägtull) på alla vägar, vilken skall tas ut vid gränsstationerna på grundval av antalet avverkade kilometer och fordonets kännetecken.(10) På grund av sin tullunion med Schweiz har Liechtenstein inga gränsstationer vid gränsen mot Schweiz. För att kunna hålla den gemensamma gränsen öppen införde Liechtenstein samma dag, den 1 januari 2001, en avgift för tunga fordon (vägtull) på alla vägar inom landet, vilken grundar sig på ett bilateralt avtal mellan Liechtenstein och Schweiz samt på liechtensteinsk lag och motsvarar den schweiziska avgiften för tunga fordon.(11) I direktiv 1999/62/EG fastställs att vägavgifter (vägtullar) får tas ut för den högsta kategorin av vägar när det i en medlemsstat inte finns något allmänt motorvägsnät (artikel 7.2 a), och därför kan Liechtenstein, som inte har något allmänt motorvägsnät, ta ut vägavgifter (vägtullar) för sin högsta kategori av vägar.(12) Det är emellertid inte möjligt att fastställa hur många kilometer som har avverkats på den högsta kategorin av vägar i Liechtenstein.(13) I direktiv 1999/62/EG fastställs att vägavgifter (vägtullar) baseras på infrastrukturkostnader (artikel 7.9).(14) Avgifterna för tunga fordon har fastställts på grundval av schweiziska infrastrukturkostnader, vilka skiljer sig från infrastrukturkostnaderna i Liechtenstein.(15) Avgiften för tunga fordon bör därför anpassas för att överensstämma med direktiv 1999/62/EG vid tillämpningen på Liechtenstein.(16) För enkelhetens skull bör anpassningen av avgiften för tunga fordon vara övergripande och därför utformas som en schablonsänkning av det kilometerantal som skall ligga till grund för beräkningen av den tull som tas ut i Liechtenstein.HÄRIGENOM FÖRESKRIVS FÖLJANDE.Artikel 1Punkt 18a i bilaga XIII till avtalet skall ersättas med följande: "399 L 0062: Europaparlamentets och rådets direktiv 1999/62/EG av den 17 juni 1999 om avgifter på tunga godsfordon för användningen av vissa infrastrukturer (EGT L 187, 20.7.1999, s. 42).Bestämmelserna i direktivet skall, inom ramen för avtalet, tillämpas med följande anpassning:a) Följande skall läggas till i artikel 3.1: '- Island: þungaskattur,- Liechtenstein: Motorfahrzeugsteuer,- Norge: Vektårsavgift.'b) I den situation som avses i artikel 8.1 skall, när det gäller Efta-stater, 'kommissionen' läsas som 'Eftas övervakningsmyndighet'.c) När det gäller Efta-staterna skall artikel 6 ersättas med följande: 'Efta-staterna skall fortsätta att tillämpa sina befintliga bestämmelser enligt artikel 3.1 för att se till att konkurrensen inte snedvrids, dvs. att satserna för de olika fordonskategorierna och underkategorierna som avses i bilaga I till direktivet inte är lägre än de i bilagan angivna minimiskattesatserna.Utan att det påverkar tillämpningen av artikel 6 i rådets direktiv 92/106/EEG(5) får Efta-staterna inte bevilja några undantag från eller nedsättning av de skatter som anges i artikel 3 som skulle snedvrida konkurrensen, dvs. göra den skatt som skall debiteras lägre än den minimiskattesats som anges i föregående stycke.'d) Följande stycke skall läggas till i slutet av artikel 7.2 a: 'När det gäller Norge får vägtullar och vägavgifter också tas ut på särskilda sekundära vägar. När det gäller Liechtenstein får vägtullar och vägavgifter tas ut på den högsta kategorin av vägar i enlighet med bestämmelserna i punkt 9 andra och tredje stycket.'e) Följande skall läggas till i artikel 7.2 b: 'När det gäller Efta-staterna skall dessa samråd hållas med Eftas övervakningskommitté.'f) Följande skall läggas till i slutet av artikel 7.9: 'Från och med den 1 januari 2001 får Liechtenstein ta ut en vägtull (avgift för tunga fordon) vars nivå motsvarar den nivå som fastställts för samma fordonskategori och i enlighet med samma system som i Schweiz. Från och med den dag då detta beslut träder i kraft skall det kilometerantal som ligger till grund för beräkningen av den vägtull som skall betalas baseras på det totala antalet avverkade kilometer, vilket skall minskas med tre kilometer varje gång gränsen mellan Liechtenstein och Österrike passeras i Schaanwald/Tisis.Om trafiken vid gränsstationen i Schaanwald/Tisis ökar oproportionerligt jämfört med andra gränsstationer i området på grund av 'omvägstransit' får Liechtenstein efter samråd med och godkännande från Gemensamma EES-kommittén minska avdraget på tre kilometer vid gränsstationen Schaanwald/Tisis.'"Artikel 2Texterna till direktiv 1999/62/EG på isländska och norska, som skall offentliggöras i EES-supplementet till Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning, skall vara autentiska.Artikel 3Detta beslut träder i kraft den 2 februari 2002 under förutsättning att alla anmälningar enligt artikel 103.1 i avtalet har gjorts till Gemensamma EES-kommittén(6).Artikel 4Detta beslut skall offentliggöras i EES-delen av och EES-supplementet till Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning.Utfärdat i Bryssel den 1 februari 2002.På Gemensamma EES-kommitténs vägnarP. WesterlundOrdförande(1) EGT L 65, 7.3.2002, s. 36.(2) EGT L 279, 12.11.1993, s. 32.(3) EGT L 160, 28.6.1994, s. 1.(4) EGT L 187, 20.7.1999, s. 42.(5) EGT L 368, 17.12.1992, s. 38.(6) Inga konstitutionella krav angivna.


text:
 30.12.2020
 GA
 Iris Oifigiúil an Aontais Eorpaigh
 L 443/3
 CINNEADH uimh. 3/2020 ÓN GCOMHCHOISTE A BUNAÍODH LEIS AN GCOMHAONTÚ MAIDIR LE RÍOCHT AONTAITHE NA BREATAINE MÓIRE AGUS THUAISCEART ÉIREANN A BHEITH AG TARRAINGT SIAR AS AN AONTAS EORPACH AGUS AS AN GCOMHPHOBAL EORPACH DO FHUINNEAMH ADAMHACH
 an 17 Nollaig 2020
 lena leasaítear an Prótacal maidir le hÉirinn agus Tuaisceart Éireann a ghabhann leis an gComhaontú maidir le Ríocht Aontaithe na Breataine Móire agus Thuaisceart Éireann a bheith ag tarraingt siar as an Aontas Eorpach agus as an gComhphobal Eorpach do Fhuinneamh Adamhach [2020/2247]
 TÁ AN COMHCHOISTE,
 Ag féachaint don Chomhaontú maidir le Ríocht Aontaithe na Breataine Móire agus Thuaisceart Éireann a bheith ag tarraingt siar as an Aontas Eorpach agus as an gComhphobal Eorpach do Fhuinneamh Adamhach (‘an Comhaontú Um Tharraingt Siar’), agus go háirithe pointe (d) d'Airteagal 164(5) de,
 De bharr an mhéid seo a leanas:
 (1)
 Le pointe (d) d'Airteagal 164(5) den Chomhaontú um Tharraingt Siar, cuirtear ar a chumas don Chomhchoiste a bunaíodh faoi Airteagal 164(1) den Chomhaontú (‘an Comhchoiste’) cinntí a ghlacadh lena ndéanfar an Comhaontú um Tharraingt Siar a leasú, ar choinníoll gur gá na leasuithe sin chun earráidí a cheartú, chun aghaidh a thabhairt ar neamhghníomhartha nó ar easnaimh eile, nó chun aghaidh a thabhairt ar chásanna nach raibh coinne leo nuair a síníodh an Comhaontú, agus ar choinníoll nach bhféadfaidh na cinntí sin eilimintí ríthábhachtacha an Chomhaontaithe a leasú. De bhun Airteagal 166(2) den Chomhaontú um Tharraingt Siar, tá na cinntí arna nglacadh ag an gComhchoiste ina gceangal ar an Aontas agus ar an Ríocht Aontaithe. Ní mór don Aontas agus don Ríocht Aontaithe cinntí den sórt sin, a bhfuil na héifeachtaí dlíthiúla céanna acu agus atá ag an gComhaontú um Tharraingt Siar, a chur chun feidhme.
 (2)
 Faoi Airteagal 182 den Chomhaontú um Tharraingt Siar, is dlúthchuid den Chomhaontú sin an Prótacal maidir le hÉirinn/Tuaisceart Éireann (‘an Prótacal’).
 (3)
 Ní bhaineann dhá ghníomh dlí maidir le feidhmíocht astaíochtaí CO2 gluaisteán nua agus veaineanna nua a chláraítear san Aontas agus a liostaítear faoi cheannteideal 9 d’Iarscríbhinn 2 a ghabhann leis an bPrótacal agus a rinneadh infheidhme maidir leis an Ríocht Aontaithe agus sa Ríocht Aontaithe i ndáil le Tuaisceart Éireann de réir Airteagal 5(4) den Phrótacal sin, le feithiclí den sórt sin a chur ar an margadh san Aontas. Dá bhrí sin ba cheart iad a bhaint d'Iarscríbhinn 2 a ghabhann leis an bPrótacal;
 (4)
 Tá ocht ngníomh dhlíthiúla ann atá riachtanach do chur i bhfeidhm rialacha an mhargaidh inmheánaigh d'earraí i ndáil le Tuaisceart Éireann agus a fágadh ar lár tráth a nglactha, ba cheart na gníomhartha sin a chur le hIarscríbhinn 2 a ghabhann leis an bPrótacal.
 (5)
 Chun raon feidhme cur i bhfeidhm gníomhartha sonracha áirithe a liostaíodh in Iarscríbhinn 2 a ghabhann leis an bPrótacal maidir le hÉirinn/Tuaisceart Éireann a shoiléiriú, ba cheart trí nóta a chur leis an Iarscríbhinn sin;
 TAR ÉIS AN CINNEADH SEO A GHLACADH
 Airteagal 1
 Déanfar Iarscríbhinn 2 a ghabhann leis an bPrótacal a leasú mar a leanas:
 1.
 faoin gceannteideal ‘9. Mótarfheithiclí, lena n-áirítear tarracóirí talmhaíochta agus foraoiseachta’, scriosfar na n-iontrálacha seo a leanas:
 ‘—
 Rialachán (CE) Uimh. 443/2009 ó Pharlaimint na hEorpa agus ón gComhairle an 23 Aibreán 2009 lena socraítear na caighdeáin feidhmíochta maidir le hastaíochtaí do ghluaisteáin nua phaisinéirí mar chuid de chur chuige comhtháite an Chomhphobail chun astaíochtaí CO2 ó fheithiclí saothair éadroim a laghdú
 —
 Rialachán (AE) Uimh. 510/2011 ó Pharlaimint na hEorpa agus ón gComhairle an 11 Bealtaine 2011 lena socraítear na caighdeáin feidhmíochta d'astaíochtaí ó fheithiclí tráchtála éadroma nua mar chuid de chur chuige comhtháite an Aontais chun astaíochtaí CO2 ó fheithiclí saothair éadroim a laghdú’;
 2.
 faoin gceannteideal ‘6. Rialacháin maidir le coimircí déthaobhacha’, cuirfear an iontráil seo a leanas leis:
 ‘—
 Rialachán (AE) 2019/287 ó Pharlaimint na hEorpa agus ón gComhairle an 13 Feabhra 2019 lena gcuirtear chun feidhme clásail choimirce dhéthaobhacha agus sásraí eile lenar féidir aistarraingt shealadach a dhéanamh ar na fabhair tharaife a bhaineann le comhaontuithe trádála áirithe a thabhairt i gcrích idir an tAontas Eorpach agus tríú tíortha (1)’;
 3.
 faoin gceannteideal ‘23. Ceimiceáin agus ábhair ghaolmhara’, cuirfear an iontráil seo a leanas leis:
 ‘—
 Rialachán (CE) Uimh. 111/2005 ón gComhairle lena leagtar síos rialacha chun faireachán a dhéanamh ar an trádáil i réamhtheachtaithe drugaí idir an Aontas agus tríú tíortha (2)’;
 4.
 faoin gceannteideal ‘25. Dramhaíl’, cuirfear an iontráil seo a leanas leis:
 ‘—
 Airteagail 2 go 7, Airteagail 14 agus 17 agus Codanna A, B, C, D agus F den Iarscríbhinn a ghabhann le Treoir (AE) 2019/904 ó Pharlaimint na hEorpa agus ón gComhairle an 5 Meitheamh 2019 maidir le laghdú ar an tionchar atá ag táirgí plaisteacha áirithe ar an gcomhshaol (3)’;
 5.
 faoin gceannteideal ‘29. Bia – ginearálta’, cuirfear an iontráil seo a leanas leis:
 ‘—
 Treoir 2011/91/AE ó Pharlaimint na hEorpa agus ón gComhairle an 13 Nollaig 2011 maidir le tásca nó marcanna lena sainaithnítear an luchtóg lena mbaineann bia-earra (4)’;
 6.
 faoin gceannteideal ‘42. Ábhar atáirgthe plandaí’, cuirfear an iontráil seo a leanas leis:
 ‘—
 Treoir 66/401/CEE ón gComhairle an 14 Meitheamh 1966 maidir le síolta plandaí farae a mhargú (5)
 —
 Treoir 98/56/CE ón gComhairle an 20 Iúil 1998 maidir le hábhar iomadaithe plandaí ornáideacha a mhargú (6)
 —
 Treoir 2008/72/CE ón gComhairle an 15 Iúil 2008 maidir le hábhair iomadaithe agus plandaithe glasraí ornáideacha, seachas síolta a mhargú (7)’;
 7.
 faoin gceannteideal ‘47. Ilghnéitheach’, cuirfear an iontráil seo a leanas leis:
 ‘—
 Rialachán (AE) 2019/880 ó Pharlaimint na hEorpa agus ón gComhairle maidir le hearraí cultúir a thabhairt isteach agus a allmhairiú’;
 8.
 faoin gceannteideal ‘4. Gnéithe trádáilbhunaithe ginearálta’, tar éis na hiontrála do ‘Rialachán (AE) Uimh. 978/2012 ó Pharlaimint na hEorpa agus ón gComhairle an 25 Deireadh Fómhair 2012 lena gcuirtear i bhfeidhm scéim um fhabhair tharaife ghinearálaithe agus lena n-aisghairtear Rialachán (CE) Uimh. 732/2008 ón gComhairle’, cuirfear an nóta seo a leanas isteach:
 ‘Gan dochar don fhíoras go mbeidh fabhair tharaife le haghaidh tíortha incháilithe de bhun Scéim Ghinearálta um Fhabhair an Aontais infheidhme sa Ríocht Aontaithe i ndáil le Tuaisceart Éireann:
 —
 ní thuigfear as na tagairtí do ‘Ballstát’ in Airteagal 9(1)(c)(ii) agus i gCaibidil VI [Forálacha maidir le cosaint agus faireachas] de Rialachán (AE) Uimh. 978/2012 go n-áirítear an Ríocht Aontaithe i ndáil le Tuaisceart Éireann;
 —
 ní thuigfear as na tagairtí do ‘margadh an Aontais’ in Airteagal 2(k) agus i gCaibidil VI [Forálacha maidir le cosaint agus faireachas] de Rialachán (AE) Uimh. 978/2012 go n-áirítear iontu margadh na Ríochta Aontaithe i ndáil le Tuaisceart Éireann; agus
 —
 ní thuigfear as na tagairtí do ‘tairgeoirí an Aontais’ agus do ‘tionscal an Aontais’ i Rialachán (AE) Uimh. 978/2012 go n-áirítear iontu táirgeoirí nó tionscal na Ríochta Aontaithe i ndáil le Tuaisceart Éireann.’;
 9.
 faoin gceannteideal ‘5. Ionstraimí cosanta trádála’, díreach faoin gceannteideal, cuirfear isteach an nóta seo a leanas:
 ‘Gan dochar don fhíoras go mbeidh feidhm ag bhearta cosanta nua trádála an Aontais sa Ríocht Aontaithe i ndáil le Tuaisceart Éireann, ní thuigfear as na tagairtí do ‘Ballstáit’ ná ‘Aontas’ i Rialachán (AE) 2016/1036, Rialachán (AE) 2016/1037, Rialachán (AE) 2015/478 agus Rialachán (AE) 2015/755 go n-áirítear iontu an Ríocht Aontaithe i ndáil le Tuaisceart Éireann. Ina theannta sin, maidir le hallmhaireoirí a d'íoc dleachtanna frithdhumpála nó frithchúitimh an Aontais ar allmhairiú earraí a bhfuarthas imréiteach custaim ina leith i dTuaisceart Éireann, féadfaidh siad aisíocaíocht ar na dleachtanna sin a iarraidh go heisiach de bhun Airteagal 11(8) de Rialachán (AE) 2016/1036 nó Airteagal 21 de Rialachán (AE) 2016/1037 faoi seach.’;
 10.
 faoin gceannteideal ‘6. Rialacháin maidir le coimircí déthaobhacha’, díreach faoin gceannteideal, cuirfear isteach an nóta seo a leanas:
 ‘Gan dochar don fhíoras go bhfuil feidhm ag bearta coimirce déthaobhacha an Aontais sa Ríocht Aontaithe i ndáil le Tuaisceart Éireann, ní thuigfear as na tagairtí do ‘Ballstáit’ ná ‘Aontas’ sna rialacháin a liostaítear thíos go n-áirítear iontu an Ríocht Aontaithe i ndáil le Tuaisceart Éireann.’;
 11.
 faoin gceannteideal ‘25. Dramhaíl’ tar éis na hiontrála do ‘Treoir (AE) Uimh. 2019/904 ó Pharlaimint na hEorpa agus ón gComhairle an 5 Meitheamh 2019 maidir le laghdú ar an tionchar atá ag táirgí plaisteacha áirithe ar an gcomhshaol’, cuirfear isteach an nóta seo a leanas:
 ‘I ndáil le cur i bhfeidhm na nAirteagal agus na gCodanna sin maidir leis an Ríocht Aontaithe agus sa Ríocht Aontaithe i ndáil le Tuaisceart Éireann, léifear aon tagairt do ‘3 Iúil 2021’ in Airteagal 4 (1), agus in Airteagail 14 agus 17 (1) mar thagairt do ‘1 Eanáir 2022’. Beidh feidhm ag Airteagail 2, 3, 14 agus 17, agus Cuid F den Iarscríbhinn, a mhéid a bhaineann siad le hAirteagail 4 go 7.’.
 Airteagal 2
 Tiocfaidh an Cinneadh seo i bhfeidhm an lá tar éis dháta a ghlactha.
 Arna dhéanamh sa Bhruiséil, an 17 Nollaig 2020.
 Thar ceann an Chomhchoiste
 Na Comhchathaoirligh
 Maroš ŠEFČOVIČ
 Michael GOVE
 (1) IO L 53, 22.2.2019, lch. 1.
 (2) IO L 22, 26.1.2005, lch. 1.
 (3) IO L 155, 12.6.2019, lch. 1.
 (4) IO L 334, 16.12.2011, lch. 1.
 (5) IO L 125, 11.7.1966, lch. 2298.
 (6) IO L 226, 13.8.1998, lch. 16.
 (7) IO L 205, 1.8.2008, lch. 28.