text:
 14.12.2015
 HR
 Službeni list Europske unije
 C 414/27
 Presuda Općeg suda od 23. listopada 2015. – TrekStor protiv OHIM-a (SmartTV Station)
 (Predmet T-649/13) (1)
 ((„Žig Zajednice - Prijava verbalnog žiga Zajednice SmartTV Station - Apsolutni razlozi za odbijanje - Nepostojanje razlikovnog karaktera - Opisni karakter - Članak 7. stavak 1. točke (b) i (c) Uredbe (EZ) br. 207/2009 - Članak 7. stavak 3. Uredbe br. 207/2009”))
 (2015/C 414/34)
 Jezik postupka: njemački
 Stranke
 Tužitelj: TrekStor Ltd (Hong-Kong, Kina) (zastupnici: O. Spieker i M. Alber, odvjetnici)
 Tuženik: Ured za usklađivanje na unutarnjem tržištu (žigovi i dizajni) (zastupnici: M. Fischer, a zatim G. Schneider i A. Schifko, agenti)
 Predmet
 Tužba protiv odluke četvrtog žalbenog vijeća OHIM-a od 1. listopada 2013. (predmet R 128/2013-4), u vezi s prijavom registracije verbalnog znaka SmartTV Station kao žiga Zajednice.
 Izreka
 1.
 Tužba se odbija.
 2.
 TrekStor Ltd snosit će osim vlastitih troškova i troškove koje zahtijeva Ured za usklađivanje na unutarnjem tržištu (žigovi i dizajni) (OHIM).
 (1) SL C 39, 8. 2. 2014.


type: contracts

jurisdiction: EU

text:
L 221/2 EN Official Journal of the European Union 24.8.2010
 AGREEMENT
 between the European Union and the Republic of Uganda on the Status of the European Union-led
 Mission in Uganda
 THE EUROPEAN UNION,
 hereinafter referred to as ‘the Union’,
 of the one part, and
 THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA,
 hereinafter referred to as ‘the Host State’,
 of the other part,
 together hereinafter referred to as the ‘Parties’,
 TAKING INTO ACCOUNT:
 — that in its Resolution 1897 (2009) on the situation in Somalia, adopted on 30 November 2009, the United Nations
 Security Council (UNSC) recalled its previous Resolutions in support of Somalia and reaffirmed its respect for the
 sovereignty, territorial integrity, political independence and unity of Somalia,
 — that the UNSC further emphasised that Somalia’s long-term security rests with the effective development by the
 Transitional Federal Government (TFG) of the National Security Force and Somali Police Force, in the framework of
 the Djibouti Agreement and in line with a national security strategy,
 — the letter dated 5 January 2010, by which the Minister of Defence of the Host State welcomed the Union’s envisaged
 mission in support of the Somali security sector and invited the Union to participate in the training of Somali security
 forces in the Host State for a period of at least one year,
 — Council Decision 2010/96/CFSP of 15 February 2010 on a European Union military mission to contribute to the
 training of Somali security forces (1),
 — that this mission is a non-executive mission which does not entail the right to take coercive measures independently
 from the consent of the Host State,
 — that this Agreement will not affect the Parties’ rights and obligations under international agreements and other
 instruments establishing international courts and tribunals, including the Statute of the International Criminal Court,
 HAVE AGREED AS FOLLOWS:
 Article 1 (c) ‘EU Mission Commander’ shall mean the Commander in the
 theatre;
 Scope and definitions
 1. This Agreement shall apply to the European Union-led
 Mission in Uganda (hereinafter referred to as ‘EUTM Somalia’)
 and to its personnel. (d) ‘EU mission headquarters’ shall mean the military head
 quarters and elements thereof, whatever their location,
 under the authority of EU military commanders exercising
 the military command or control of the mission;
 2. This Agreement shall apply only within the territory of
 the Host State.
 (e) ‘national contingents’ shall mean units and elements
 belonging to the Member States of the Union and to
 3. For the purpose of this Agreement:
 other States participating in the mission;
 (a) ‘EUTM Somalia’ shall mean EU mission headquarters and
 national contingents contributing to the mission, their (f) ‘EUTM Somalia personnel’ shall mean the civilian and
 equipment and their means of transport; military personnel assigned to EUTM Somalia as well as
 personnel deployed for the preparation of the mission and
 personnel on mission for a Sending State or an institution
 of the Union in the framework of the mission, present,
 (b) ‘mission’ shall mean the preparation, establishment, except as otherwise provided in this Agreement, within
 execution and support of EUTM Somalia; the territory of the Host State, with the exception of
 personnel employed locally and personnel employed by
 (1) OJ L 44, 19.2.2010, p. 16. international commercial contractors;
 ---pagebreak--- 24.8.2010 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 221/3
 (g) ‘personnel employed locally’ shall mean personnel who are in Article 3(1) or, in the case of first entry, of an individual or
 nationals of, or permanently resident in, the Host State; collective movement order issued by EUTM Somalia. They shall
 be exempt from visa regulations, and the Host State shall
 facilitate EUTM Somalia personnel with immigration inspections
 (h) ‘facilities’ shall mean all premises, accommodation and land and customs control requirements, on entering, leaving or
 areas required for EUTM Somalia and EUTM Somalia within the Host State’s territory.
 personnel;
 (i) ‘Sending State’ shall mean a State providing a national 2. EUTM Somalia personnel shall be exempt from the Host
 contingent for EUTM Somalia, including Member States of State’s regulations on the registration and control of aliens, but
 the Union and third States participating in the mission; shall not acquire any right to permanent residence or domicile
 within the Host State’s territory.
 (j) ‘Host State’ shall mean the Republic of Uganda;
 3. The Host State shall be provided, for information
 purposes, with a general list of EUTM Somalia equipment
 (k) ‘official correspondence’ shall mean all correspondence
 entering its territory. This equipment shall carry EUTM
 relating to the mission and its functions.
 Somalia identification markings. The procedure hereof shall be
 sufficient to satisfy all customs and inspection requirements.
 Article 2
 General provisions
 4. EUTM Somalia personnel may drive motor vehicles and
 1. EUTM Somalia and EUTM Somalia personnel shall respect operate aircrafts within the Host State’s territory provided they
 the laws and regulations of the Host State and shall refrain from have valid national, international or military driving licences or
 any action or activity incompatible with the objectives of the pilot licences, as appropriate.
 mission.
 2. EUTM Somalia shall regularly inform the government of 5. For the purpose of the mission, the Host State shall grant
 the Host State of the number of EUTM Somalia personnel EUTM Somalia and EUTM Somalia personnel freedom of
 stationed within the Host State’s territory. movement and freedom to travel within its territory,
 including its air space.
 Article 3
 Identification 6. For the purpose of the mission, EUTM Somalia and the
 means of transport that it charters may use public roads,
 1. EUTM Somalia personnel shall carry passports or military
 bridges, ferries and airports without the payment of duties,
 identity cards with them at all times.
 fees, tolls, taxes and similar charges. EUTM Somalia shall not
 be exempt from reasonable charges for services requested and
 received, under the conditions that apply to those provided to
 2. EUTM Somalia vehicles, aircraft and other means of
 the Host State’s armed forces.
 transport shall carry distinctive EUTM Somalia identification
 markings and/or registration plates, of which the relevant
 Host State authorities shall be notified.
 Article 5
 3. EUTM Somalia shall have the right to display the flag of Privileges and immunities of EUTM Somalia granted by the
 the Union and markings such as military insignia, titles and Host State
 official symbols, on its facilities, vehicles and other means of
 1. EUTM Somalia’s facilities shall be inviolable. The Host
 transport. The uniforms of EUTM Somalia personnel shall carry
 State’s agents shall not enter them without the consent of the
 a distinctive EUTM Somalia emblem. National flags or insignia
 EU Mission Commander.
 of the constituent national contingents of the mission may be
 displayed on the EUTM Somalia facilities, vehicles and other
 means of transport and uniforms, as decided by the EU
 Mission Commander. 2. EUTM Somalia’s facilities, their furnishings and other
 assets therein as well as its means of transport shall be
 immune from search, requisition, attachment or execution.
 Article 4
 Border crossing and movement within the Host State’s
 territory
 3. EUTM Somalia, its property and assets, wherever located
 1. EUTM Somalia personnel shall enter the Host State’s and by whomsoever held as duly authorised by EUTM Somalia,
 territory only on presentation of the documents provided for shall enjoy immunity from every form of legal process.
 ---pagebreak--- L 221/4 EN Official Journal of the European Union 24.8.2010
 4. EUTM Somalia’s archives and documents shall be instituted against EUTM Somalia personnel before any Host
 inviolable at any time, wherever they may be. State court, the EU Mission Commander and the competent
 authority of the Sending State or the institution of the Union
 shall be notified immediately. Prior to initiation of civil
 proceedings before the court, the EU Mission Commander
 5. The official correspondence of EUTM Somalia shall be
 and the competent authority of the Sending State or the insti
 inviolable.
 tution of the Union shall certify to the court whether the act in
 question was committed by EUTM Somalia personnel in the
 exercise of official functions.
 6. In respect of purchased and imported goods, services
 provided and facilities used by EUTM Somalia for the
 purposes of the mission, EUTM Somalia shall be exempt from
 all taxes and charges of a similar nature in the Host State. If the act was committed in the exercise of official functions,
 EUTM Somalia providers or contractors shall also be civil proceedings shall not be initiated and the provisions of
 exempted from those taxes and charges of a similar nature Article 15 shall apply. If the act was not committed in the
 concerning goods, services and facilities provided by them to exercise of official functions, civil proceedings may continue.
 EUTM Somalia. EUTM Somalia shall not be exempt from dues, The certification by the EU Mission Commander and the
 taxes or charges that represent payment for services requested competent authority of the Sending State or the institution of
 and rendered. the Union shall be binding upon the jurisdiction of the Host
 State which may not contest it.
 7. The Host State shall permit the entry and exit of articles
 for the mission and grant them exemption from all custom
 duties, fees, tolls, taxes and similar charges other than charges The initiation of civil proceedings by EUTM Somalia personnel
 for storage, cartage and other services requested and rendered. shall preclude them from invoking immunity from jurisdiction
 in respect of any counter-claim directly connected with the
 principal claim.
 Article 6
 Privileges and immunities of EUTM Somalia personnel
 granted by the Host State 5. EUTM Somalia personnel shall not be obliged to give
 evidence as witnesses.
 1. EUTM Somalia personnel shall not be liable to any form
 of arrest or detention.
 EUTM Somalia and the Sending State may produce statements
 2. Papers, correspondence and property of EUTM Somalia of witnesses or affidavits by EUTM Somalia personnel about
 personnel shall enjoy inviolability, except in case of measures criminal acts witnessed in the context of training Somali
 of execution which are permitted pursuant to paragraph 6. security forces in Uganda.
 3. EUTM Somalia personnel shall enjoy immunity from the
 criminal jurisdiction of the Host State under all circumstances. 6. No measures of execution may be taken in respect of
 EUTM Somalia personnel, except in the case where civil
 proceedings not related to official functions are instituted
 against them. Property of EUTM Somalia personnel, which is
 The immunity from criminal jurisdiction of EUTM Somalia
 certified by the EU Mission Commander to be necessary for the
 personnel may be waived by the Sending State or the institution
 fulfilment of official functions, shall be free from seizure for the
 of the Union concerned, as the case may be. Such waiver shall
 satisfaction of a judgement, decision or order. In civil
 always be in writing.
 proceedings, EUTM Somalia personnel shall not be subject to
 any restrictions on their personal liberty or to any other
 measures of constraint.
 The immunity of EUTM Somalia personnel from the jurisdiction
 of the Host State shall not exempt them from the jurisdiction of
 the respective Sending State. In the event of an allegation of a
 criminal offence being committed by EUTM Somalia personnel, 7. EUTM Somalia personnel shall with respect to services
 the Sending State shall inform the Host State of the outcome of rendered for EUTM Somalia be exempt from social security
 such judicial procedure as it undertakes in connection with the provisions which may be in force in the Host State.
 alleged criminal offence.
 4. EUTM Somalia personnel shall enjoy immunity from the 8. EUTM Somalia personnel shall be exempt from any form
 civil and administrative jurisdiction of the Host State in respect of taxation in the Host State on the salary and emoluments paid
 of words spoken or written and all acts performed by them in to them by EUTM Somalia or the Sending States, as well as on
 the exercise of official functions. If any civil proceedings are any income received from outside the Host State.
 ---pagebreak--- 24.8.2010 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 221/5
 9. The Host State shall, in accordance with such laws and 4. The law applicable to contracts concluded by EUTM
 regulations as it may adopt, permit entry of, and grant Somalia in the Host State shall be determined by the contract.
 exemption from, all customs duties, indirect and direct taxes,
 excise duties, and related charges other than charges for storage,
 cartage and similar services, on articles for the personal use of 5. The contract may stipulate that the dispute settlement
 EUTM Somalia personnel. procedure referred to in Article 15(3) and (4) shall be applicable
 to disputes arising from the application of the contract.
 Any inspection of personal baggage of EUTM Somalia
 personnel shall be conducted only in the presence of the 6. The Host State shall facilitate the implementation of
 EUTM Somalia personnel concerned or of an authorised repre contracts concluded by EUTM Somalia with commercial
 sentative of EUTM Somalia. entities for the purposes of the mission.
 Article 7 Article 11
 Personnel employed locally Change to facilities
 Personnel employed locally shall enjoy privileges and 1. EUTM Somalia shall be authorised to construct, alter or
 immunities only to the extent admitted by the Host State. otherwise modify facilities as requested for its operational
 However, the Host State shall exercise its jurisdiction over requirements.
 that personnel in such a manner as not to interfere unduly
 with the performance of the functions of the mission.
 2. No compensation shall be requested from EUTM Somalia
 by the Host State for those constructions, alterations or modi
 Article 8 fications.
 Criminal jurisdiction
 The competent authorities of a Sending State shall have the 3. Prior to the withdrawal of EUTM Somalia, where appro
 right to exercise on the territory of the Host State all the priate, the EU Mission Commander will enter into negotiations
 criminal jurisdiction and disciplinary powers conferred on on an arrangement in application of Article 18 with a view to
 them by the law of the Sending State with regard to all seeking reasonable residual value for fixed and/or moveable
 EUTM Somalia personnel subject to the relevant law of the facilities provided or improved with EUTM Somalia funds that
 Sending State. will remain after withdrawal of EUTM Somalia. If EUTM
 Somalia is taken over by a successor mission, the Host State
 shall make the facilities available to this successor mission free
 Article 9 of charge.
 Uniform and arms
 1. The wearing of uniform shall be subject to rules adopted Article 12
 by the EU Mission Commander. Deceased EUTM Somalia personnel
 1. The EU Mission Commander shall have the right to take
 2. EUTM Somalia military personnel may carry arms and charge of, and make suitable arrangements for, the repatriation
 ammunition on condition that they are authorised to do so of any deceased EUTM Somalia personnel, as well as that of
 by their orders which shall be communicated to the Host State. their personal property.
 Article 10 2. No autopsy shall be performed on any deceased EUTM
 Somalia personnel without the agreement of the State of
 Host State support and contracting nationality of the deceased person concerned and the presence
 1. The Host State agrees, if requested, to assist EUTM of a representative of EUTM Somalia and/or the State of
 Somalia in finding suitable facilities. nationality of the deceased person concerned.
 2. The Host State shall provide, free of charge, facilities of 3. The Host State and EUTM Somalia shall cooperate to the
 which it is the owner, in so far as such facilities are requested fullest extent possible with a view to early repatriation of
 for the conduct of administrative and operational activities of deceased EUTM Somalia personnel.
 EUTM Somalia.
 Article 13
 3. Within its means and capabilities, the Host State shall Security of EUTM Somalia and military police
 assist in the preparation, establishment, and execution of, and
 support for, the mission. The Host State’s assistance and 1. The Host State shall take all appropriate measures to
 support of the mission shall be provided under the same ensure the safety and security of EUTM Somalia and its
 conditions as the assistance and support given to the Host personnel, including those necessary to protect its facilities
 State’s armed forces. against any external attack or intrusion.
 ---pagebreak--- L 221/6 EN Official Journal of the European Union 24.8.2010
 2. The EU Mission Commander may establish a military equal basis of representatives of EUTM Somalia and represen
 police unit in order to maintain order in EUTM Somalia tatives of the Host State. Settlement of claims shall be reached
 facilities. by common agreement.
 3. The military police unit may also, in consultation and 4. Where no settlement can be reached within the claims
 cooperation with the military police or the police of the Host commission, the dispute shall:
 State, act outside EUTM Somalia facilities to ensure the main
 tenance of good order and discipline among EUTM Somalia
 personnel. (a) for claims up to and including EUR 40 000, be settled by
 diplomatic means between representatives of the Host State
 and of the Union;
 Article 14
 Communications
 (b) for claims above the amount referred to in point (a), be
 1. EUTM Somalia may install and operate radio sending and submitted to an arbitration tribunal, the decisions of
 receiving stations, as well as satellite systems. It shall cooperate which shall be binding.
 with the Host State’s competent authorities with a view to
 avoiding conflicts in the use of appropriate frequencies. The
 Host State shall grant access to the frequency spectrum free
 of charge. 5. The arbitration tribunal shall be composed of three arbi
 trators, one arbitrator being appointed by the Host State, one
 arbitrator being appointed by EUTM Somalia and the third one
 being appointed jointly by the Host State and EUTM Somalia.
 2. EUTM Somalia shall enjoy the right to unrestricted Where one of the Parties does not appoint an arbitrator within
 communication by radio (including satellite, mobile and hand- two months or where no agreement can be found between the
 held radio), telephone, telegraph, facsimile and other means, as Host State and EUTM Somalia on the appointment of the third
 well as the right to install the equipment necessary for the arbitrator, the arbitrator in question shall be appointed by the
 maintenance of such communications within and between President of the Court of Justice of the European Union.
 EUTM Somalia facilities, including the laying of cables and
 land lines for the purpose of the mission.
 6. An administrative arrangement shall be concluded
 between EUTM Somalia and the administrative authorities of
 the Host State in order to determine the terms of reference of
 3. Within its own facilities EUTM Somalia may make the
 the claims commission and the arbitration tribunal, the
 arrangements necessary for the conveyance of mail addressed
 procedure applicable within those bodies and the conditions
 to and from EUTM Somalia and/or EUTM Somalia personnel.
 under which claims are to be lodged.
 Article 15 Article 16
 Claims for death, injury, damage and loss Liaison and disputes
 1. EUTM Somalia and EUTM Somalia personnel shall not be 1. All issues arising out of, or in connection with, the appli
 liable for any damage to or loss of civilian or government cation of this Agreement shall be examined jointly by represen
 property which are related to operational necessities or caused tatives of EUTM Somalia and of the Host State’s competent
 by activities in connection with civil disturbances or protection authorities.
 of EUTM Somalia.
 2. Failing any prior settlement, disputes concerning the inter
 2. With a view to reaching an amicable settlement, claims pretation or application of this Agreement shall be settled
 for damage to or loss of civilian or government property not exclusively by diplomatic means between the representatives
 covered by paragraph 1, as well as claims for death of or injury of the Host State and of the Union.
 to persons and for damage to or loss of EUTM Somalia
 property, shall be forwarded to EUTM Somalia via the
 competent authorities of the Host State, as far as claims
 brought by legal or natural persons from the Host State are Article 17
 concerned, or to the competent authorities of the Host State, as Other provisions
 far as claims brought by EUTM Somalia are concerned.
 1. Whenever this Agreement refers to the privileges,
 immunities and rights of EUTM Somalia and of EUTM
 Somalia personnel, the Government of the Host State shall be
 3. Where no amicable settlement can be found, the claim responsible for their implementation and for compliance with
 shall be submitted to a claims commission composed on an them on the part of the appropriate Host State local authorities.
 ---pagebreak--- 24.8.2010 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 221/7
 2. Nothing in this Agreement is intended or may be 2. Notwithstanding paragraph 1, the provisions contained in
 construed as to derogate from any rights that may attach to a Articles 4(6), 5(1) to (3), 5(6), 5(7), 6(1), 6(3), 6(4), 6(6), 6(7) to
 Member State of the Union or to any other State contributing (9), 10(2), 11 and 15 shall be deemed to have applied from the
 to EUTM Somalia under other agreements. date on which the first EUTM Somalia personnel were deployed
 if that date was earlier than the date of entry into force of this
 Agreement.
 Article 18
 Implementing arrangements 3. This Agreement may be amended by written agreement
 between the Parties.
 For purposes of the application of this Agreement, operational,
 administrative and technical matters may be the subject of 4. Termination of this Agreement shall not affect any rights
 separate arrangements to be concluded between the EU or obligations arising out of the execution of this Agreement
 Mission Commander and the Host State’s administrative before such termination.
 authorities.
 Article 19 Done at Kampala, in duplicate, in the English language, this
 12th day of August 2010.
 Entry into force and termination
 1. This Agreement shall enter into force on the day on
 which it is signed and shall remain in force until the date of
 For the European Union For the Republic of Uganda
 departure of the last EUTM Somalia element and of the last
 EUTM Somalia personnel, as notified by EUTM Somalia. Vincent DE VISSCHER Crispus KIYONGA


type: legislation

text:
 Svarīgs juridisks paziņojums
 |
 52006PC0244
 Priekšlikums Eiropas Parlamenta un Padomes regula, ar kuru groza Regulu (EK) Nr. 1073/1999 par izmeklēšanu, ko veic Eiropas Birojs krāpšanas apkarošanai (OLAF) {SEC(2006) 638 } /* COM/2006/0244 galīgā redakcija - COD 2006/0084 */
 [pic] | EIROPAS KOPIENU KOMISIJA |Briselē, 24.5.2006COM(2006) 244 galīgā redakcija2006/0084 (COD)PriekšlikumsEIROPAS PARLAMENTA UN PADOMES REGULA,ar kuru groza Regulu (EK) Nr. 1073/1999 par izmeklēšanu, ko veic Eiropas Birojs krāpšanas apkarošanai (OLAF)(iesniegusi Komisija) {SEC(2006) 638 }PASKAIDROJUMA RAKSTSPamatojums un mērķiEiropas Biroju krāpšanas apkarošanai (OLAF) izveidoja 1999. gadā. Galvenie tiesiskā regulējuma instrumenti, uz kuriem balstās Biroja darbība, ir Eiropas Parlamenta un Padomes Regula (EK) Nr. 1073/1999[1], Padomes 1999. gada 25. maija Regula (Euratom) Nr. 1074/1999[2], ar kuru nosaka OLAF veiktās iekšējās un ārējās izmeklēšanas kārtību, un Komisijas 1999. gada 28. aprīļa Lēmums Nr. 1999/352 (EK/EOTK/Euratom)[3], ar ko izveido Biroju.2003. gada aprīlī Komisija apstiprināja pirmo OLAF darbības novērtējumu[4], kurā iekļauta virkne ieteikumu, kuru mērķis ir tālāk stiprināt Biroja darbību. Komisija secināja, ka Biroja sinerģija un institucionālā situācija (Komisijas dienests, kam piešķirta darbības neatkarība) ir darboties spējīga, taču nepieciešams uzlabot Biroja efektivitāti un sadarbību ar dalībvalstīm. Eiropas Parlaments atbalstīja Komisijas apņemšanos izstrādāt attiecīgos tiesību aktu priekšlikumus[5].2004. gada februārī Komisija pieņēma priekšlikumus, ar kuriem groza Regulas (EK) Nr. 1073/1999 un (Euratom) Nr. 1074/1999[6]. To mērķis bija stiprināt personas procesuālās tiesības, nodrošināt labāku kontroli pār izmeklēšanas ilgumu un uzlabot informācijas apmaiņu starp Biroju un attiecīgajām iestādēm, kā arī operatīvās darbības efektivitāti. Pirms šo priekšlikumu izskatīšanas uzsākšanas Parlaments un Padome lūdza veikt Biroja darbības papildu novērtēšanu. Šādā kontekstā Revīzijas palāta izstrādāja īpašu ziņojumu [7]par to, kā tiek vadīts OLAF, kurā iekļauti konkrēti ieteikumi un atzinums par 2004. gada februārī ierosinātajiem grozījumiem[8]. Revīzijas palāta piekrīt, ka pašreizējā Biroja struktūra – Komisijas dienests, kam piešķirta darbības neatkarība – ir apmierinoša. Tomēr Palāta iesaka veikt papildu pasākumus, lai uzlabotu Biroja darbības efektivitāti, jo īpaši attiecībā uz pārvaldību un izmeklēšanas ilgumu, sadarbību ar valstu iestādēm un koncentrēšanos uz pamatuzdevumiem, kā arī uz Uzraudzības komitejas pilnvarām.2005. gada jūlijā Budžeta kontroles komiteja sarīkoja Eiropas Parlamentā atklāto izskatīšanu attiecībā uz OLAF stiprināšanu, kurā piedalījās arī Komisijas priekšsēdētāja vietnieki Kallas un Frattini, pārstāvji no Revīzijas palātas un Tiesas, kā arī vadošie eksperti. Šīs izskatīšanas laikā Komisijas priekšēdētāja vietnieks Kallas uzsvēra, cik svarīgi ir ieviest OLAF krāpšanas novēršanas nolūkos veiktās izmeklēšanas politisku pārvaldību, kā arī to, ka nepieciešama neatkarīga izmeklēšanas procedūru un ilguma kontrole, vienlaikus nodrošinot izmeklēšanas konfidencialitātes aizsardzību. Atklātās izskatīšanas rezultātā varēja secināt, ka Biroja pašreizējā institucionālā struktūra nerada šķēršļus tā darbības neatkarībai, ka jāstiprina aizstāvības tiesības un jāpārskata kontroles funkcija.Šis priekšlikums izstrādāts, balstoties uz šiem secinājumiem. Tajā iekļauts līdz 2004. gada februārim sasniegtais, un tas izvērsts tālāk. Ņemot vērā novērtējuma, Revīzijas palātas veiktās revīzijas un atklātās izskatīšanas secinājumus, šajā priekšlikumā nav skarta Biroja institucionālā struktūra, un tas paredz vienīgi uzlabot Biroja darbību esošās sistēmas ietvaros. Ņemot vērā izdarīto grozījumu apjomu, šis priekšlikums aizstāj 2004. gada 10. februāra priekšlikumu, kas tiek atsaukts.Stiprināta pārvaldība līdztekus ar kontroles padomdevēja institūcijas izveidošanu un precizējumiem par informācijas apriti starp OLAF un attiecīgām iestādēm, organizācijām, birojiem vai aģentūrām, palīdz izveidot pareizu līdzsvaru starp neatkarību un kontroli.Vienlaikus ar šo priekšlikumu Komisijas dienesti izstrādāja Komisijas iekšējā lēmuma projektu, ko Komisijas locekļi ir pieņēmuši zināšanai un kas likumdevējam tiks nosūtīts informācijai. Šajā daļā tiks iekļauti sīkāki pasākumi un noteikumi, kas attiecas uz Regulas (EK) Nr. 1073/1999 jauno noteikumu piemērošanu. To vajadzēs pielāgot vēlāk, ņemot vērā galvenās regulas galīgo tekstu, ko pieņems Eiropas Parlaments un Padome. Vajadzības gadījumā tas pats attieksies uz Iestāžu nolīgumu, kas 1999. gada 25. maijā tika noslēgts starp Eiropas Parlamentu, Padomi un Komisiju. Citiem OLAF un iestāžu un dienestu sadarbības aspektiem vajadzēs pievērsties vēlāk.Priekšlikumā pēc būtības ir šādi galvenie elementi:Pārvaldība, sadarbība starp iestādēm un Uzraudzības komiteju2005. gada jūlija izskatīšanas laikā tika izvirzīti jautājumi par Uzraudzības komitejas jauno lomu, kādu 2004. gada februārī ierosināja Komisija. Komisija turklāt uzskata, ka nepieciešama politiskā pārvaldība attiecībā uz prioritātēm, kas saistītas ar izmeklēšanas darbību. Nepieciešams pārskatīt attiecības starp Uzraudzības komiteju, Biroju un iestādēm, organizācijām, birojiem vai aģentūrām, iedibinot ciešāku sadarbību.Šajā nolūkā Komisija ierosina Uzraudzības komitejai regulāri vai pēc pieprasījuma tikties ar Eiropas Parlamenta, Padomes un Komisijas pārstāvjiem strukturēta dialoga ietvaros, tomēr neiejaucoties izmeklēšanas gaitā. Šim dialogam jārada iespēja apspriest stratēģisko prioritāšu noteikšanu, Biroja darbības programmu, kā arī minētās komitejas un Biroja ģenerāldirektora gada darbības pārskatu. Šā strukturētā dialoga mērķis ir īstenot izmeklēšanas laikā veikto darbību un Biroja un komitejas darbības efektivitātes politiskās kontroles funkciju un nodrošināt labas attiecības starp Biroju un EK iestādēm, organizācijām, birojiem vai aģentūrām, jo īpaši informācijas nodošanas jomā. Komitejas uzdevums strukturētā dialoga ietvaros ir sniegt atzinumu un nākt klajā ar ieteikumiem, jo īpaši attiecībā uz izraudzīšanos un gadījumos, kad Biroja ģenerāldirektoram tiek piemēroti disciplinārsodi.Iesaistīto personu tiesību garantēšana2004. gada priekšlikumi paredz procesuālas garantijas, kas saglabātas arī šajā priekšlikumā. Cik vien iespējams, priekšlikums paredz saskaņot iekšējās un ārējās izmeklēšanas procedūras, lai vienkāršotu to pielietošanu un stiprinātu juridisko noteiktību.Komisija ierosina regulā iekļaut sīki izstrādātu noteikumu par procesuālajām garantijām, kas jāievēro, veicot iekšēju un ārēju izmeklēšanu. Šīs garantijas pamatojas uz noteikumiem, kas iekļauti Iestāžu nolīgumā par iekšēju izmeklēšanu (un dažādos lēmumos, ar kuriem to īsteno), Civildienesta noteikumos un OLAF rokasgrāmatā, kā arī papildina tos. Tos iekļaujot pašā regulā, ir iespējams izveidot vienotu pamata garantiju kopumu, kas piemērojamas attiecībā uz ikvienu OLAF veikto izmeklēšanu, vai tā būtu iekšēja vai ārēja. 2004. gada februārī tika ierosinātas šādas papildu garantijas:- noteikumi par informāciju, kādu OLAF jāsniedz pirms iztaujāšanas, un par iztaujāšanas protokola sagatavošanu;- tiesības iztaujāšanas laikā saņemt paša izraudzītas personas palīdzību;- tiesības neliecināt pret sevi.Šīs garantijas jāievēro ne vien attiecībā uz galīgā ziņojuma izstrādi, bet arī uz informācijas nodošanu valsts iestādēm.Izmeklēšanas kontroles stiprināšanaLīdztekus sīki izstrādātu noteikumu iekļaušanai attiecībā uz procesuālajām garantijām (7.a pants), kas jāievēro, veicot iekšēju un ārēju izmeklēšanu, šķiet, ka to ievērošana jānodrošina ar stiprinātu kontroli un jāparedz iespēja lūgt atzinumu. Šādu kontroli nodrošina kontroles padomdevējs, kas Biroja ietvaros savas funkcijas veic uz ekskluzīva pamata, darbojoties pilnīgi neatkarīgi. Tā neatkarību garantē priekšlikuma 14. pants un jo īpaši Uzraudzības komitejas loma izraudzīšanās procesā. Šajā kontrolē ņem vērā izmeklēšanas konfidencialitāti un labas pārvaldības principu, profesionālo noslēpumu un datu aizsardzību, kā arī to, ka gan disciplinārās iestādes, gan tiesu iestādes īsteno savas attiecīgās prerogatīvas.Stiprinātā kontrole attiecas uz visiem iekšējās vai ārējās izmeklēšanas posmiem, tādējādi nodrošinot vienotu kontroles kārtību visām Biroja izmeklēšanas darbībām. Procesuālie noteikumi attiecībā uz kontroles padomdevēja atzinumu jānosaka ar Komisijas iekšēju lēmumu. Kontroles padomdevēja funkcija ir papildu pasākums, ar kuru nebūt nav paredzēts aizstāt Kopienas tiesu veikto tiesas kontroli, bet gan stiprināt jau esošos kontroles mehānismus.Ierosinātie noteikumi nosaka jaunu kārtību ilgtermiņa izmeklēšanai. Iestādes, uz kurām „attiecas” izmeklēšana, kā arī Uzraudzības komiteja jāinformē par kontroles padomdevēja atzinumu, ja OLAF pēc šā atzinuma saņemšanas nolemj turpināt izmeklēšanu ilgāk par divpadsmit mēnešiem. Savukārt Komisijai un Uzraudzības komitejai jāsaņem statistikas un analīzes ziņojumi, ko regulāri izstrādā kontroles padomdevējs attiecībā uz iekšējās un ārējās izmeklēšanas ilgumu.Izmeklēšanas kontrole izmeklēšanas laikā pirmām kārtām ir ātra kontrole, kas tiek veikta Biroja ietvaros. Kontroles padomdevējam jāsniedz atzinumi:- par procesuālajām garantijām, kas paredzētas šīs regulas 6. panta 5. punktā (saprātīgs izmeklēšanas ilgums) un 7.a pantā – pēc paša ierosmes vai, ja to lūdz jebkurš EK ierēdnis vai darbinieks vai jebkurš uzņēmējs, kuru notiekošā izmeklēšana uzskata par personīgi iesaistītu. Šo atzinumu var lūgt jebkurā laikā, kamēr notiek izmeklēšana;- par izmeklēšanas ilgumu, kas pārsniedz divpadsmit mēnešus un tad, ja tā tiek tālāk pagarināta, pārsniedzot astoņpadsmit mēnešus – pēc Biroja ģenerāldirektora lūguma; šo atzinumu nosūta iestādei, organizācijai, birojam vai aģentūrai, uz kuru attiecas izmeklēšana, kā arī Uzraudzības komitejai;- gadījumos, kad nepieciešams atlikt pienākuma īstenošanu par personīgi iesaistītas personas uzaicināšanu paust savus apsvērumus par visiem uz to attiecīgiem faktiem;- jebkurā laikā, kamēr notiek izmeklēšana, kad to lūdz Biroja ģenerāldirektors saistībā ar izmeklēšanas kontroli.Ierosinātais mehānisms izmeklēšanas beigu posmā piešķir EK ierēdnim vai darbiniekam vai jebkurai citai fiziskai personai vai uzņēmējam, kas ir personīgi iesaistīts faktos, par kuriem notiek izmeklēšana, tiesības saņemt no Biroja informāciju par izmeklēšanas beigu ziņojuma secinājumiem un ieteikumiem; šis akts atļauj ieinteresētai personai, kas uzskata, ka izmeklēšanas gaitā procesuālās garantijas attiecībā uz viņu nav ievērotas, vērsties pie kontroles padomdevēja ar lūgumu sniegt atzinumu. Uz šīm tiesībām izmeklēšanas beigu posmā saņemt informāciju attiecas izņēmums, ko nosaka nepieciešamība saglabāt pilnīgu slepenību un kas paredzēts, lai aizsargātu izmeklēšanas rezultātā ierosinātās krimināllietas un nodrošinātu efektīvu OLAF sadarbību ar policijas un tiesu iestādēm.Informācijas aprites uzlabošanaa) Starp OLAF un Eiropas iestādēm un struktūrāmNoteikumi par informācijas nodošanu attiecīgajai iestādei vai struktūrai ir būtiski nepieciešami, lai Eiropas iestādes varētu pildīt savus politiskos pienākumus gadījumos, kad to ierēdņi tiek turēti aizdomās par nelikumīgām darbībām un / vai kad nepieciešama administratīva darbība, lai aizsargātu Eiropas Savienības intereses. Šādos gadījumos OLAF jāpieprasa sniegt informāciju attiecīgajai iestādei vai struktūrai. Tāpat attiecīgajai iestādei, organizācijai, birojam vai aģentūrai jābūt informētai par to, ka OLAF nodod informāciju tiesu iestādēm. Šajā ziņā 2004. gada noteikumi ir pārņemti pilnībā.Tāpat ir pamatoti, ka, līdztekus dalībvalstīm, arī Komisija, kas ir atbildīga par Kopienu finansiālo interešu aizsardzību, varētu lūgt, lai tiktu sākta ārēja izmeklēšana, lai tā tiktu informēta gadījumos, kad ir nepieciešams veikt pasākumus, lai nodrošinātu Kopienu finansiālo interešu aizsardzību izmeklēšanas gaitā, un lai tā saņemtu informāciju par to rezultātiem.Tāpat nepieciešams veicināt informācijas apmaiņu starp OLAF, no vienas puses, un Europol un Eurojust, no otras puses, lai padarītu efektīvāku cīņu pret krāpšanu, korupciju un jebkādām citām nelikumīgām darbībām, kas kaitē Eiropas Kopienu finansiālajām interesēm.b) Starp OLAF un dalībvalstīmPriekšlikums paredz vēl vairāk stiprināt sadarbību starp OLAF un dalībvalstīm ārējās izmeklēšanas jomā un attiecībā uz informācijas plūsmu. Tas paredz, ka attiecībā uz ikvienu izmeklēšanu Birojs tiek informēts par visām darbībām, ko veic valstu tiesu iestādes saistībā ar informāciju, kas tām nodota OLAF veiktās izmeklēšanas laikā vai pēc izmeklēšanas pabeigšanas.c) Starp OLAF un ziņotājiemIkviena persona iestādē, organizācijā, birojā vai aģentūrā, kas nodod Birojam informāciju par krāpšanas gadījumu vai pārkāpumu, tiks informēta par to, vai, pamatojoties uz šo informāciju, izmeklēšana ir sākta vai ne.Turklāt ikviens, ieskaitot iepriekš minētās personas, var pēc pieprasījuma saņemt no Biroja informāciju par izmeklēšanas pabeigšanu un, attiecīgajā gadījumā, par galīgā izmeklēšanas ziņojuma nosūtīšanu kompetentajām iestādēm, ar nosacījumu, ka šī informācija neskar attiecīgās personas tiesības un nekaitē izmeklēšanas un tai sekojošu pasākumu konfidencialitātei.OLAF darbības efektivitātes veicināšanaIerosināti noteikumi, kas ļaus OLAF koncentrēties uz savas darbības prioritātēm. Skaidri jānorāda, ka OLAF ir rīcības brīvība lemt par to, vai sākt izmeklēšanu, un lūgt attiecīgajām iestādēm izskatīt lietas, kas ir mazāk nozīmīgas vai kas neietilpst izmeklēšanas prioritātēs, aicinot šīs iestādes sniegt informāciju par pasākumiem, kas veikti attiecībā uz tā lūgumiem.Vispārīgāk ņemot, būtu jāprecizē izmeklēšanas sākšanas un pabeigšanas procedūras, kā arī esošā saikne starp Eiropas iestāžu un struktūru iekšējām darbībām, no vienas puses, un OLAF izmeklēšanu, no otras puses. Kamēr notiek OLAF iekšējā izmeklēšana, iestādes, organizācijas, biroji vai aģentūras nedrīkst sākt paralēlu izmeklēšanu.Tāpat kā iepriekš, lēmuma pieņemšana par izmeklēšanas sākšanu vai nesākšanu ir OLAF kompetencē, ņemot vērā tā prioritātes un izmeklēšanas darbības programmu, kā arī proporcionalitātes principu; Uzraudzības komiteja arī turpmāk stingri ievēros un garantēs Biroja darbības neatkarību, veicot izmeklēšanu.OLAF veiktās izmeklēšanas efektivitātes uzlabošanaSaskaņā ar ieteikumiem, kas ietverti novērtējuma ziņojumā attiecībā uz tiešajiem izdevumiem, tiek ierosināts precizēt OLAF izmeklēšanas pilnvaras ārējas izmeklēšanas kontekstā, kas tiek veikta attiecībā uz uzņēmējiem, kas saņem Kopienas līdzekļus, pamatojoties uz līgumiem vai subsīdiju līgumiem vai lēmumiem (tiešie izdevumi). Šie precizējumi tāpat veicinās arī tās izmeklēšanas efektivitāti, ko OLAF veic netiešo izdevumu jomā.Attiecībā uz ārējas izmeklēšanas veikšanu OLAF jāpiešķir labāka piekļuve Eiropas iestāžu un struktūru rīcībā esošai informācijai. Tāpat būtu jāveicina arī piekļuve uzņēmēju rīcībā esošai informācijai, veicot iekšēju izmeklēšanu.Biroja ģenerāldirektora pilnvarasLai stiprinātu tā neatkarību, tika atzīts, ka ir lietderīgi ģenerāldirektoram paredzēt nepagarināmas pilnvaras.Lai veicinātu iestāžu apspriešanās procedūru, paredzēts, ka lēmumu pieņem Komisija pēc saskaņošanas ar citu iestāžu pārstāvjiem, kas strukturētā dialoga ietvaros tiekas ar Uzraudzības komiteju.Dokuments skaidri paredz iespēju, ka ģenerāldirektors nenodod valstu iestādēm informāciju par faktiem, kas attiecīgā gadījumā varētu būt par iemeslu krimināllietai, ja šāda informācijas nodošana nav pamatota proporcionalitātes un kriminālvajāšanas efektivitātes iemeslu dēļ. Par šādu lēmumu informē Uzraudzības komiteju un kontroles padomdevēju.Saistītās tiesību normasJāpiezīmē, ka Komisija vienlaikus ierosina grozīt Regulu (Euratom) Nr. 1074/1999, kas nosaka tiesisko regulējumu izmeklēšanai, ko OLAF veic saskaņā ar Kopienas tiesībām, uz kurām attiecas Euratom līgums.Juridiskais pamatsKomisijas priekšlikumā paredzēts izdarīt grozījumus esošajā Regulā (EK) Nr. 1073/1999 un tādējādi tas pamatojas uz Eiropas Kopienas dibināšanas līguma 280. pantu.Subsidiaritāte un proporcionalitāteRegula, ar kuru izdara grozījumus, pilnībā atbilst subsidiaritātes principam. Tāpat kā sākotnējā Regula (EK) Nr. 1073/1999, šī regula, ar kuru izdara grozījumus, nekādā veidā nemazina dalībvalstu pilnvaras un pienākumus veikt pasākumus cīņā pret krāpšanu, kas skar Kopienu finansiālās intereses. OLAF darbības veidi ārējas izmeklēšanas ietvaros ir precizēti un stiprināti vienīgi tur, kur praksē atklājušās esošo sistēmu juridiskās nepilnības un kur OLAF efektīvāka iejaukšanās var nodrošināt uzticamu ārējas izmeklēšanas veikšanu, kuras rezultātus var izmantot dalībvalsts iestādes. Turklāt nepieciešams pamata procesuālās garantijas attiecināt arī uz ārēju izmeklēšanu, lai iedibinātu vienotu tiesisko regulējumu visai OLAF veiktajai izmeklēšanai. Tā kā attiecībā uz minētajiem aspektiem nepieciešami skaidri noteikumi, kas iekļauti pašos Kopienas tiesību aktos, lai nodrošinātu efektīvu OLAF darbību juridiskās noteiktības ietvaros, šie noteikumi arī atbilst proporcionalitātes principam.PamattiesībasKā apstiprinājusi Tiesa (2003. gada 10. jūlija spriedums lietā C-11/00 Komisija/BCE, 139. punkts), Regula (EK) Nr. 1073/1999 tās sākotnējā formā, jau ietver likumdevēja noteikumu, ka uz OLAF pilnvaru piešķiršanu attiecas pilnīga cilvēktiesību un pamatbrīvību ievērošana. Šķiet lietderīgi vēl vairāk stiprināt procesuālās garantijas un panākt, ka tās attiecas uz visu OLAF veikto izmeklēšanu – gan iekšēju, gan ārēju. Šīs garantijas ievēro pamattiesības, kas jo īpaši atzītas Eiropas Savienības pamattiesību hartā, vai pat pārsniedz obligāto aizsardzības līmeni, kāds noteikts Hartā.Ietekme uz budžetuPriekšlikuma pielikumā pievienotais finanšu pārskats liecina, ka priekšlikumam nav ietekmes uz budžetu.2006/0084 (COD)PriekšlikumsEIROPAS PARLAMENTA UN PADOMES REGULA,ar kuru groza Regulu (EK) Nr. 1073/1999 par izmeklēšanu, ko veic Eiropas Birojs krāpšanas apkarošanai (OLAF)EIROPAS PARLAMENTS UN EIROPAS SAVIENĪBAS PADOME,ņemot vērā Eiropas Kopienas dibināšanas līgumu, un jo īpaši tā 280. pantu,ņemot vērā Komisijas priekšlikumu[9],ņemot vērā Revīzijas palātas atzinumu,pēc apspriešanās ar Eiropas datu aizsardzības uzraudzītāju,saskaņā ar Līguma 251. pantā noteikto procedūru[10],tā kā:(1) Jānosaka skaidri noteikumi, kas, pilnībā apstiprinot Eiropas Biroja krāpšanas apkarošanai (turpmāk tekstā – „Birojs”) prioritāro kompetenci veikt izmeklēšanu, izveido mehānismus, kas ļauj iestādēm, organizācijām, birojiem vai aģentūrām ātri pārņemt to lietu izmeklēšanu, kurās Birojs nolemj neiejaukties.(2) Skaidri jānosaka, ka uz Biroja izmeklēšanas sākšanu attiecas diskrēcijas princips, saskaņā ar kuru Birojs var nesākt izmeklēšanu lietā, kas ir maznozīmīga vai neattiecas uz Biroja ik gadus noteiktajām izmeklēšanas prioritātēm. Iekšējas izmeklēšanas gadījumā šādas lietas jāizmeklē iestādēm, bet ārējas izmeklēšanas gadījumā – valstu kompetentajām iestādēm saskaņā ar noteikumiem, kādus piemēro katrā dalībvalstī.(3) Precīzi jānosaka Biroja pienākumi savlaicīgi informēt iestādes, organizācijas, birojus vai aģentūras par notiekošo izmeklēšanu gadījumos, ja faktos, par kuriem notiek izmeklēšana, ir personīgi iesaistīts to loceklis, vadītājs, ierēdnis vai darbinieks, vai cits personāla loceklis, vai varētu būt nepieciešami piesardzības vai administratīvi pasākumi, lai aizsargātu Eiropas Savienības intereses.(4) Lai veicinātu Biroja veiktās izmeklēšanas efektivitāti un ņemot vērā Biroja darbības novērtējumus, ko veikušas iestādes, jo īpaši Komisijas 2003. gada aprīļa novērtējuma ziņojumu un Revīzijas palātas īpašo ziņojumu Nr. 1/2005 par to, kā tiek vadīts Eiropas Birojs krāpšanas apkarošanai OLAF, nepieciešams precizēt dažus aspektus un uzlabot konkrētus pasākumus, ko Birojs var veikt izmeklēšanas gaitā. Birojam jābūt pilnvarām iekšējas izmeklēšanas ietvaros un gadījumos, kad krāpšana saistīta ar līgumiem, kas attiecas uz Kopienas līdzekļiem, veikt pārbaudes un inspekcijas, kas paredzētas Padomes 1996. gada 11. novembra Regulā ( Euratom , EK) Nr. 2185/96 par pārbaudēm un apskatēm uz vietas, ko Komisija veic, lai aizsargātu Eiropas Kopienu finanšu intereses pret krāpšanu un citām nelikumībām[11], bet ārējas izmeklēšanas ietvaros piekļūt informācijai, kas ir Eiropas Savienības iestāžu, organizāciju, biroju vai aģentūru rīcībā.(5) Juridiskās noteiktības labad nepieciešams precizēt procesuālās garantijas, kas piemērojamas Biroja veiktās iekšējas un ārējas izmeklēšanas ietvaros. Tas neskar plašāku aizsardzību, kas var izrietēt no Līgumu noteikumiem, Civildienesta noteikumiem, kā arī no piemērojamiem valstu noteikumiem.(6) Lai stiprinātu personu, par kurām tiek veikta izmeklēšana, tiesību aizsardzību un neskarot Eiropas Kopienu Civildienesta noteikumu 90.a pantu un Līgumā noteiktās Eiropas Kopienu tiesas pilnvaras, personīgi iesaistītajai personai izmeklēšanas beigu posmā būtu jābūt tiesībām saņemt izmeklēšanas galīgā ziņojuma secinājumus un ieteikumus, un, ja tā uzskata, ka nav ievērotas procesuālās garantijas, šai personai būtu jābūt iespējai lūgt ar šo regulu noteiktajam kontroles padomdevējam sniegt atzinumu.(7) Lai panāktu lielāku pārskatāmību, nepieciešams nodrošināt pienācīgu ziņotāju informētību, tos informējot par lēmumu sākt vai nesākt izmeklēšanu un, ja tas tiek lūgts, par tās darbības galīgo iznākumu, kas veikta, pamatojoties uz sniegto informāciju.(8) Ja izrādās, ka par iekšējas izmeklēšanas galīgajā ziņojumā konstatētajiem faktiem, kas varētu būt uzskatāmi par noziedzīgu nodarījumu, nevar efektīvi veikt turpmākus tiesu pasākumus, ņemot vērā, konkrēti, šo faktu būtību, maznozīmīgumu vai nelielos finansiālos zaudējumus, Biroja ģenerāldirektoram jānosūta galīgais ziņojums tieši attiecīgajai iestādei, organizācijai, birojam vai aģentūrai, lai tiktu īstenota piemērotāka turpmākā rīcība. Ir svarīgi, lai viņš informētu Uzraudzības komiteju un kontroles padomdevēju par visiem lēmumiem nenosūtīt galīgo ziņojumu tiesu iestādēm, šos lēmumus pienācīgi pamatojot.(9) Ņemot vērā praktiskajā darbībā gūto pieredzi, ir lietderīgi atļaut Biroja ģenerāldirektoram ar rakstisku dokumentu, kurā noteikti šādas deleģēšanas nosacījumi un ierobežojumi, deleģēt atsevišķu savu funkciju veikšanu vienam vai vairākiem Biroja darbiniekiem.(10) Ir lietderīgi stiprināt Uzraudzības komitejas veikto kontroli, jo īpaši attiecībā uz informācijas nodošanu starp Biroju un iestādēm, organizācijām, birojiem vai aģentūrām, kā arī uz attīstības tendencēm jautājumos par procesuālo garantiju piemērošanu un izmeklēšanas ilgumu. Tāpat šķiet nepieciešams iedibināt sadarbību starp Uzraudzības komiteju un Eiropas Parlamentu, Padomi un Komisiju, dodot Uzraudzības komitejai iespēju, neskarot tās locekļu neatkarības statusu, strukturētā dialoga ietvaros tikties ar šo iestāžu pārstāvjiem.(11) Lai stiprinātu pilnīgu neatkarību, veicot Biroja vadīšanas funkcijas, ģenerāldirektors jāieceļ uz septiņiem gadiem, bez iespējas tikt ieceltam atkārtoti.(12) Lai stiprinātu procesuālo garantiju ievērošanu, kontroles padomdevējam jāuzliek pienākums pēc paša ierosmes vai pēc pieprasījuma pilnīgi neatkarīgi sniegt atzinumu attiecībā uz šīm garantijām, un sniegt atzinumus atsevišķos citos gadījumos, jo īpaši, ja to lūdz personīgi iesaistīta persona.(13) Šīs regulas īstenošanai vajadzīgie pasākumi būtu jāpieņem saskaņā ar Padomes 1999. gada 28. jūnija Lēmumu 1999/468/EK, ar ko nosaka Komisijai piešķirto ieviešanas pilnvaru īstenošanas kārtību[12].(14) Tādēļ attiecīgi jāgroza Regula (EK) 1073/1999.(15) Ar šo regulu Biroja darbības veidi ārējas izmeklēšanas ietvaros ir precizēti un stiprināti vienīgi tur, kur atklājušās esošās sistēmas juridiskās nepilnības un kur vienīgi Biroja efektīvāka iejaukšanās var nodrošināt uzticamu ārējas izmeklēšanas veikšanu, kuras rezultātus var izmantot dalībvalstu iestādes. Turklāt nepieciešams procesuālās garantijas attiecināt arī uz ārēju izmeklēšanu, lai iedibinātu vienotu tiesisko regulējumu visai Biroja veiktajai izmeklēšanai. Šajā regulā tiek pilnīgi ievērots subsidiaritātes princips, kā noteikts Līguma 5. pantā. Atbilstīgi minētajā pantā noteiktajam proporcionalitātes principam šī regula neparedz neko tādu, kas nav tieši saistīts ar šo mērķu sasniegšanu.(16) Šī regula respektē pamattiesības un ievēro principus, kas ir atzīti Eiropas Savienības Pamattiesību hartā, jo īpaši tās 47. un 48. pantā.IR PIEŅĒMUŠI ŠO REGULU.1. pantsRegulu (EK) Nr. 1073/1999 groza šādi:1) 3. pantu aizstāj ar šādu:„3. pants Ārēja izmeklēšana1. Birojs īsteno pilnvaras, kas ar Regulu (Euratom, EK) Nr. 2185/96 uzticētas Komisijai, lai veiktu inspekcijas un pārbaudes dalībvalstīs un saskaņā ar spēkā esošiem nolīgumiem — trešās valstīs un starptautiskās organizācijās.Daļa no Biroja izmeklēšanas uzdevumiem ir inspekcijas un pārbaudes, ko Birojs veic dalībvalstīs, kā paredzēts Regulas (EK, Euratom) Nr. 2988/95 9. panta 1. punktā un minētās regulas 9. panta 2. punktā minētajos nozaru noteikumos, un saskaņā ar spēkā esošiem sadarbības nolīgumiem — trešās valstīs.2. Lai noteiktu, ka notikusi krāpšana, korupcija vai jebkāda cita nelikumīga darbība, kas minēta 1. pantā, saistībā ar subsīdijas līgumu vai lēmumu vai līgumu, kas attiecas uz Kopienas finansējumu, Birojs saskaņā ar Regulā (Euratom, EK) Nr. 2185/96 noteikto kārtību var veikt inspekcijas uz vietas pie uzņēmējiem, uz kuriem attiecas šāds finansējums.3. Veicot ārēju izmeklēšanu un, ciktāl tas ir absolūti nepieciešams, lai noteiktu, vai notikusi krāpšana, korupcija vai jebkāda cita nelikumīga darbība, kas minēta 1. pantā, Birojs var piekļūt jebkādai attiecīgai informācijai, kas ir iestāžu, organizāciju, biroju vai aģentūru rīcībā, saistībā ar izmeklējamiem faktiem. Šajā nolūkā piemēro šīs regulas 4. panta 2. un 4. punktu.4. Ja pirms izmeklēšanas sākšanas Biroja rīcībā ir informācija, kas liek domāt, ka notikusi krāpšana, korupcija vai jebkāda cita nelikumīga darbība, kas minēta 1. pantā, Biroja ģenerāldirektors par to var informēt attiecīgo dalībvalstu kompetentās iestādes un, neskarot nozaru noteikumus, šīs iestādes veic atbilstošus turpmākos pasākumus un, ja vajadzīgs, veic izmeklēšanu saskaņā ar piemērojamām valsts tiesībām, kurā var piedalīties Biroja darbinieki. Attiecīgo dalībvalstu kompetentās iestādes informē Biroja ģenerāldirektoru par rezultātiem, kādi iegūti, balstoties uz šo informāciju.”2) 4. pantu groza šādi:a) 3. punktu aizstāj ar šādu:„3. Saskaņā ar Regulā (Euratom, EK) Nr. 2185/96 izklāstītajām procedūrām Birojs var veikt pēkšņas inspekcijas attiecīgu uzņēmēju telpās, lai iegūtu pieeju informācijai, kas attiecas uz iekšējās izmeklēšanas faktiem.”b) 5. punktu svītro.3) 5. pantu aizstāj ar šādu:„5. pants Izmeklēšanas sākšana1. Birojs var sākt izmeklēšanu, ja pastāv pietiekami nopietnas aizdomas, ka notikusi krāpšana vai korupcija vai citas nelikumīgas darbības, kas minētas 1. pantā. Lēmumā sākt vai nesākt izmeklēšanu ņem vērā izmeklēšanas politikas prioritātes un Biroja darbības programmu izmeklēšanas jomā, kas noteiktas saskaņā ar 11.a pantu un 12. panta 5. punktu. Šajā lēmumā tāpat ņem vērā Biroja resursu lietderīgu izmantošanu un izmantoto līdzekļu samērīgumu.2. Ārēju izmeklēšanu sāk ar Biroja ģenerāldirektora lēmumu pēc viņa ierosmes vai pēc attiecīgās dalībvalsts vai Komisijas lūguma.Iekšēju izmeklēšanu sāk ar Biroja ģenerāldirektora lēmumu pēc viņa ierosmes vai pēc tās iestādes lūguma vai tās organizācijas, biroja vai aģentūras lūguma, kurā jāveic izmeklēšana.Kamēr Birojs veic iekšēju izmeklēšanu šīs regulas izpratnē, iestādes, organizācijas, biroji vai aģentūras nesāk paralēlu administratīvo izmeklēšanu par tiem pašiem faktiem.3. Ja iestāde, organizācija, birojs vai aģentūra plāno sākt izmeklēšanu, pamatojoties uz savu administratīvo autonomiju, tā vēršas pie Biroja ar jautājumu, vai par attiecīgiem faktiem jau netiek veikta iekšēja izmeklēšana. Birojs 15 darba dienu laikā kopš šāda jautājuma saņemšanas norāda, vai izmeklēšana jau ir sākta vai arī Birojs paredzējis sākt izmeklēšanu, piemērojot 4. punktu. Ja atbilde netiek sniegta, tiek uzskatīts, ka Birojs nolēmis nesākt iekšēju izmeklēšanu.4. Lēmumu sākt vai nesākt izmeklēšanu pieņem divu mēnešu laikā pēc tam, kad OLAF saņēmis 2. vai 3. punktā paredzēto lūgumu. Par lēmumu nekavējoties informē iestādi, organizāciju, biroju vai aģentūru vai dalībvalsti, kas iesniegusi lūgumu. Lēmums nesākt izmeklēšanu tiek pamatots.Ja iestādes, organizācijas, biroja vai aģentūras ierēdnis vai darbinieks saskaņā ar Civildienesta noteikumu 22.a pantu vai atbilstošiem noteikumiem pārējo darbinieku nodarbināšanas kārtībā informē Biroju par aizdomām par krāpšanu vai pārkāpumu, Birojs šo personu informē par lēmumu sākt vai nesākt izmeklēšanu par attiecīgajiem faktiem.5. Ja Birojs, pamatojoties uz savas rīcības brīvības apsvērumiem vai uz izmeklēšanas jomas prioritātēm, nolemj nesākt iekšēju izmeklēšanu, tas nekavējoties nosūta pieejamos pierādījumus attiecīgajai iestādei, organizācijai, birojam vai aģentūrai, lai varētu veikt pienācīgu turpmāko rīcību saskaņā ar noteikumiem, kas uz to attiecas. Attiecīgos gadījumos Birojs vienojas ar iestādi, organizāciju, biroju vai aģentūru par atbilstošiem pasākumiem, lai aizsargātu informācijas avota konfidencialitāti un, ja vajadzīgs, pieprasa, lai tam tiktu sniegta informācija par turpmāko rīcību.Ja Birojs, pamatojoties uz savas rīcības brīvības apsvērumiem vai izmeklēšanas jomas prioritātēm, nolemj nesākt ārēju izmeklēšanu, piemēro 3. panta 4. punktu.”4) 6. pantu groza šādi:a) 1. un 3. punktā vārdus „direktors” aizstāj ar vārdiem „ģenerāldirektors”.b) Iekļauj šādu jaunu 5.a punktu:„5.a Tiklīdz izmeklēšana atklāj, ka iestādes, organizācijas, biroja vai aģentūras loceklis, vadītājs, ierēdnis vai darbinieks vai jebkura cita persona, kas tur strādā, var būt personiski iesaistīta, vai tā liecina, ka varētu būt lietderīgi veikt piesardzības vai administratīvus pasākumus, lai aizsargātu Eiropas Savienības intereses, attiecīgo iestādi, organizāciju, biroju vai aģentūru informē par notiekošo izmeklēšanu. Sniegtajā informācijā norāda:a) personas vai personu, par kurām tiek veikta izmeklēšana, identitāti, kā arī attiecīgo faktu kopsavilkumu;b) jebkādu informāciju, kas var līdzēt iestādei, organizācijai, birojam vai aģentūrai lemt, vai nepieciešams veikt piesardzības vai administratīvus pasākumus, lai aizsargātu Eiropas Savienības intereses;c) attiecīgos gadījumos – ieteiktos īpašos konfidencialitātes pasākumus.Attiecīgos gadījumos iestāde, organizācija, birojs vai aģentūra lemj, vai nepieciešami piesardzības vai administratīvie pasākumi, ņemot vērā nepieciešamību nodrošināt izmeklēšanas efektivitāti, kā arī Biroja ieteiktos īpašos konfidencialitātes pasākumus„.c) Pievieno šādu 7. punktu:„7. Ja tiek secināts, ka izmeklēšanu nevar pabeigt divpadsmit mēnešu laikā kopš tās sākšanas, Biroja ģenerāldirektors var lemt pagarināt tās termiņu uz laiku līdz sešiem mēnešiem. Pirms šāda lēmuma pieņemšanas, viņš lūdz kontroles padomdevēja atzinumu, kā paredzēts 14. pantā. Kontroles padomdevējs piecpadsmit darba dienu laikā sniedz Biroja ģenerāldirektoram atzinumu par to, vai notiekošajā izmeklēšanā tiek ievērots 6. panta 5. punkts, un par Biroja ģenerāldirektora minētajiem pagarināšanas iemesliem, kā arī vajadzības gadījumā izsaka ieteikumus, kas būtu lietderīgi turpmākai izmeklēšanas veikšanai. Kontroles padomdevējs nosūta sava atzinuma kopiju attiecīgās iestādes, organizācijas, biroja vai aģentūras ģenerālsekretāram un Uzraudzības komitejai.. Ja nepieciešams, šādu lēmumu par pagarināšanu var pieņemt atkārtoti ar tādiem pašiem nosacījumiem.”5) Pievieno šādu 7. a un 7. b pantu:„7.a pants Garantijas procesa laikā1. Izmeklēšanā Birojs vāc pierādījumus pret attiecīgo personu un par labu tai.2. Ja izmeklēšana atklāj, ka iestādes, organizācijas, biroja vai aģentūras loceklis, vadītājs, ierēdnis vai darbinieks, vai jebkura cita persona, kas tur strādā, vai uzņēmējs var būt personiski iesaistīts, attiecīgo personu par to informē, ja vien tas netraucē izmeklēšanas gaitai.Jebkurā gadījumā nevar izdarīt izmeklēšanas secinājumus, kas konkrēti attiecas uz kādu fizisku vai juridisku personu, ja šādai personīgi iesaistītai personai nav bijusi iespēja paust savus apsvērumus par attiecīgajiem faktiem. Šai personai jāsniedz šo faktu kopsavilkums, uzaicinot to paust savus apsvērumus. Šai personai var palīdzēt kāda viņa/s izvēlēta persona. Ikvienai personīgi iesaistītai personai ir tiesības paust savus apsvērumus kādā no Kopienas oficiālajām valodām, kādu izvēlas šī persona, tomēr Kopienas ierēdņiem vai darbiniekiem var lūgt izteikties kādā no Kopienas oficiālajām valodām, kurā tiem ir ļoti labas zināšanas. Personīgi iesaistītai personai ir tiesības neliecināt pret sevi.Gadījumos, kad izmeklēšanai vajadzīga pilnīga slepenība vai vajadzīgi izmeklēšanas līdzekļi, kas ir valsts tiesu iestāžu kompetencē vai, ārējas izmeklēšanas gadījumā, valsts kompetentās iestādes kompetencē, Biroja ģenerāldirektors var nolemt atlikt pildīt pienākumu uzaicināt personīgi iesaistīto personu izklāstīt savus apsvērumus. Par to viņš vispirms informē kontroles padomdevēju, kas sniedz atzinumu saskaņā ar 14. panta 3. punktu. Ja notiek iekšēja izmeklēšana, Biroja ģenerāldirektors šo lēmumu saskaņo ar iestādi, organizāciju, biroju vai aģentūru, kurai attiecīgā persona ir piederīga.3. Uzaicinājums uz jebkādu iztaujāšanu gan lieciniekam, gan personai, kas ir personīgi iesaistīta 2. punkta izpratnē, jānosūta, par to paziņojot vismaz astoņas darba dienas iepriekš, šo termiņu var saīsināt, par to vienojoties ar personu, kas jāiztaujā. Uzaicinājumā tiek uzskaitītas iztaujājamās personas tiesības. Birojs sagatavo iztaujāšanas protokolu un dara to pieejamu iztaujātajai personai, lai tā apstiprinātu šo protokolu vai pievienotu tam papildu apsvērumus.Ja iztaujāšanas gaitā atklājas, ka iztaujājamā persona varētu būt iesaistīta izmeklējamos faktos, nekavējoties piemēro 2. punktā paredzētos procesuālos noteikumus.4. Šajā pantā paredzētās procesuālās garantijas piemēro, neskarot:a) plašāku aizsardzību, kas attiecīgā gadījumā izriet no Līgumu noteikumiem, kā arī piemērojamiem valstu noteikumiem;b) Civildienesta noteikumos paredzētās tiesības un pienākumus.7.b pants Informēšana par izmeklēšanas izbeigšanu bez turpmākas rīcībasJa izmeklēšanas rezultātā nevar uzrādīt pierādījumus pret iestādes, organizācijas, biroja vai aģentūras locekli, vadītāju, ierēdni vai darbinieku, vai citu personu, kas tur strādā, vai pret uzņēmēju, uz to attiecīgā izmeklēšana tiek izbeigta bez turpmākas rīcības ar Biroja ģenerāldirektora lēmumu, kas par to rakstiski informē ieinteresēto personu, kā arī, vajadzības gadījumā, tās iestādi, organizāciju, biroju vai aģentūru.”6) Regulas 8. panta 3. un 4. punktu aizstāj ar šādiem punktiem:„3. Birojs ievēro Kopienas un valstu noteikumus par personas datu aizsardzību un jo īpaši tos, kas paredzēti ar Eiropas Parlamenta un Padomes Regulu (EK) Nr. 45/2001(*).4. Biroja ģenerāldirektors raugās, lai tiktu piemēroti šā panta noteikumi, kā arī EK Līguma 287. panta noteikumi._________________(*) OV L 8, 12.1.2001., 1. lpp.”7) Iekļauj šādu 8.a pantu:„8.a pants Paziņošana par galīgo ziņojumu, pabeidzot izmeklēšanuPirms izmeklēšanas galīgā ziņojuma nosūtīšanas attiecīgajām iestādēm, organizācijām, birojiem vai aģentūrām vai attiecīgo dalībvalstu kompetentajām iestādēm, Birojs galīgā ziņojuma secinājumus un ieteikumus nosūta personai, kas ir personīgi iesaistīta faktos, par kuriem tiek veikta iekšēja vai ārēja izmeklēšana.Biroja ģenerāldirektors var nolemt nesniegt pirmajā daļā minēto paziņojumu vienīgi tad, ja izmeklēšanai vajadzīga pilnīga slepenība vai vajadzīgi izmeklēšanas līdzekļi, kas ir valsts tiesu iestāžu kompetencē. Ja notiek iekšēja izmeklēšana, viņš lēmumu saskaņo ar iestādi, organizāciju, biroju vai aģentūru, kurai attiecīgā persona ir piederīga.Ja personīgi iesaistītā persona uzskata, ka šīs regulas 6. panta 5. punktā un 7.a pantā paredzētās procesuālās garantijas nav ievērotas tā, ka tas var ietekmēt izmeklēšanas secinājumus, tā desmit darba dienu laikā pēc galīgā ziņojuma secinājumu saņemšanas var vērsties pie kontroles padomdevēja ar lūgumu sniegt atzinumu.”8) 9. pantu groza šādi:a) 1. punktu aizstāj ar šādu:„1. Kad pabeigta Biroja veiktā izmeklēšana, Birojs ģenerāldirektora vadībā sagatavo ziņojumu, kurā norāda procedūras gaitu, juridisko pamatu, konstatētos faktus un to juridisko kvalifikāciju, attiecīgā gadījumā - finansiālos zaudējumus, kā arī izmeklēšanas secinājumus, ieskaitot ieteikumus par turpmāku rīcību.”b) 3. punktu aizstāj ar šādu:„3. Pēc ārējas izmeklēšanas sagatavotus ziņojumus un jebkurus citus dokumentus, kas ar to saistīti, nosūta attiecīgo dalībvalstu kompetentām iestādēm saskaņā ar noteikumiem, kas attiecas uz ārēju izmeklēšanu, kā arī Komisijai. Attiecīgo dalībvalstu kompetentās iestādes tiktāl, ciktāl tas nav pretrunā ar valsts tiesību aktiem, informē Biroja ģenerāldirektoru par turpmāku rīcību saistībā ar izmeklēšanas ziņojumu, kas tām tika nosūtīts.”c) Iekļauj šādu jaunu 3.a punktu:„3.a. Ja pēc iekšējas izmeklēšana sagatavotajā ziņojumā atklājas, ka pastāv tādi fakti, kas var būt par iemeslu krimināllietām, galīgo ziņojumu nosūta attiecīgās dalībvalsts tiesu iestādēm. Tomēr Biroja ģenerāldirektors var nolemt nenosūtīt šo galīgo ziņojumu tiesu iestādēm, ja tas uzskata, ka, ņemot vērā faktu būtību, to maznozīmīgumu, finansiālo zaudējumu nelielo apjomu, pastāv iekšēji pasākumi, kas ļauj īstenot piemērotāku turpmāku rīcību. Jebkurā gadījumā viņš nosūta galīgo ziņojumu attiecīgajai iestādei, organizācijai, birojam vai aģentūrai saskaņā ar 4. punktu. Kontroles padomdevēju un Uzraudzības komiteju informē par visiem lēmumiem nenosūtīt galīgo ziņojumu tiesu iestādēm, šos lēmumus pienācīgi pamatojot.”d) Pievieno šādu 5. punktu:„5. Ziņotājs, kas Birojam nodeva informāciju attiecībā uz aizdomām par krāpšanu vai pārkāpumu pēc pieprasījuma var saņemt no Biroja informāciju par to, ka izmeklēšana ir pabeigta, kā arī, attiecīgā gadījumā, par to, ka galīgais ziņojums ir nosūtīts kompetentajām iestādēm. Tomēr Birojs var noraidīt pieprasījumu, ja tas uzskata, ka šis pieprasījums ir tāda rakstura, kas var kaitēt attiecīgās personas likumīgām tiesībām, izmeklēšanas un turpmākās rīcības efektivitātei vai konfidencialitātes prasībām.”9) 10. pantu aizstāj ar šādu:„ 10. pants Informācijas apmaiņa starp Biroju un dalībvalstu iestādēm1. Neskarot šīs regulas 8.un 9. pantu un Regulas (Euratom, EK) Nr. 2185/96 noteikumus, Birojs jebkurā laikā var nodot attiecīgo dalībvalstu kompetentām iestādēm ārējā izmeklēšanā iegūto informāciju.2. Neskarot šīs regulas 8. un 9. pantu, Biroja ģenerāldirektors iekšējas izmeklēšanas laikā nodod attiecīgās dalībvalsts tiesu iestādēm informāciju, ko Birojs ieguvis par faktiem, kuri attiecas uz izmeklēšanas procedūrām, kas ir valsts tiesu iestāžu kompetencē, vai par kuriem, ņemot vērā to nopietnību, nepieciešams nekavējoties ierosināt krimināllietu. Šādā gadījumā viņš vispirms informē attiecīgo iestādi, organizāciju, biroju vai aģentūru. Nosūtītā informācija ietver tās personas identitāti, kuru izmeklēšana uzskata par iesaistītu, konstatēto faktu kopsavilkumu, provizorisko juridisko kvalifikāciju un provizoriskos finansiālos zaudējumus.Pirms pirmajā daļā paredzētās informācijas nodošanas Birojs dod personai, kuru izmeklēšana uzskata par iesaistītu, iespēju paust savus apsvērumus par faktiem, kas uz to attiecas, ar tādiem nosacījumiem un tādā kārtībā, kāda paredzēta 7.a panta 2. punkta otrajā un trešajā daļā.3. Attiecīgās dalībvalsts kompetentās iestādes un jo īpaši tiesu iestādes tiktāl, ciktāl tas nav pretrunā ar valsts tiesībām, cik iespējams drīz informē Biroja ģenerāldirektoru par darbību, kas veikta attiecībā uz informāciju, kas tām nosūtīta saskaņā ar šo pantu.”10) 11. pantu groza šādi:a) 1. punktu aizstāj ar šādu:„1. Uzraudzības komiteja stiprina Biroja neatkarību, pastāvīgi uzraugot izmeklēšanas uzdevumu īstenošanu.. Uzraudzības komiteja raugās, lai tiktu ievēroti noteikumi, kas attiecas uz informācijas nodošanu starp Biroju un iestādēm, organizācijām, birojiem vai aģentūrām.. Uzraudzības komiteja uzrauga attīstības tendences attiecībā uz procesuālo garantiju piemērošanu un izmeklēšanas ilgumu, pamatojoties uz Biroja ģenerāldirektora sniegto periodisko statistiku un regulāriem atzinumiem un ziņojumiem, ko šajā jomā sniedz kontroles padomdevējs, un balstoties uz ciešu sadarbību ar Biroja ģenerāldirektoru.. Uzraudzības komiteja pēc pašas ierosmes vai pēc Biroja ģenerāldirektora vai iestādes, organizācijas, biroja vai aģentūras lūguma sniedz atzinumu Biroja ģenerāldirektoram, tomēr neiejaucoties notiekošās izmeklēšanas gaitā. Šāda atzinuma kopiju nosūta pieprasītājam.”b) 7. un 8. punktu aizstāj ar šādiem:„7. Biroja ģenerāldirektors katru gadu nosūta Uzraudzības komitejai Biroja darbības programmu izmeklēšanas jomā. Viņš regulāri informē Uzraudzības komiteju par Biroja darbību, tā veikto izmeklēšanu, izmeklēšanas rezultātiem un rīcību sakarā ar tiem.. Biroja ģenerāldirektors informē Uzraudzības komiteju:a) par gadījumiem, kad attiecīgā iestāde, organizācija, birojs vai aģentūra nav ievērojusi sniegtos ieteikumus;b) par gadījumiem, kad informācija jānodod dalībvalsts tiesu iestādēm.8. Uzraudzības komiteja par savu darbību pieņem vismaz vienu ziņojumu gadā, kurā īpaši ziņo par procesuālo garantiju piemērošanu un izmeklēšanas ilgumu; šos ziņojumus tā nosūta iestādēm. Komiteja par Biroja veikto izmeklēšanu un par rīcību ar to var iesniegt ziņojumus Eiropas Parlamentam, Padomei, Komisijai un Revīzijas palātai.”11) Iekļauj šādu 11.a pantu:„11.a pants Strukturēts dialogs ar iestādēmLai izstrādātu kopējas pamatnostādnes, Uzraudzības komiteja vismaz divas reizes gadā un, ja to lūdz kāda no iestādēm, strukturētā dialoga ietvaros politiskā līmenī tiekas ar pārstāvi, ko iecēlis attiecīgi Eiropas Parlaments, Padome un Komisija.Strukturētais dialogs attiecas uz Biroja izmeklēšanas veikšanas funkciju un jo īpaši uz:a) Uzraudzības komitejas un ģenerāldirektora gada darbības pārskatu,;b) Biroja darbības programmu izmeklēšanas jomā;c) aspektiem, kas saistīti ar Biroja politikas prioritātēm izmeklēšanas jomā;d) labām attiecībām starp Biroju un iestādēm, organizācijām, birojiem vai aģentūrām;e) Biroja izmeklēšanas jomā veiktās darbības un Uzraudzības komitejas darbības efektivitāti.Strukturētais dialogs neskar izmeklēšanas gaitu.Birojs attiecīgi rīkojas saskaņā ar atzinumiem, kas pausti strukturētā dialoga ietvaros.”12) 12. pantu groza šādi:a) Nosaukumu un 1. punktu aizstāj ar šādu:„ 12. pants Ģenerāldirektors1. Pēc apspriešanās ar citu iestāžu pārstāvjiem, strukturētā dialoga ietvaros tiekoties ar Uzraudzības komiteju, Komisija ieceļ Biroja ģenerāldirektoru uz septiņiem gadiem bez iespējas tikt ieceltam atkārtoti. Apspriešanos rīko, pamatojoties uz kandidātu sarakstu, ko izveido Komisija, pamatojoties uz uzaicinājumu iesniegt pieteikumus.”b) 2. punktu svītro.c) 3. punktā vārdus „direktors” aizstāj ar vārdiem „ģenerāldirektors”.d) 4. punktu aizstāj ar šādu:„4. Pirms disciplinārsodu uzlikšanas ģenerāldirektoram Komisija apspriežas ar Uzraudzības komiteju, strukturētā dialoga ietvaros tiekoties ar citu iestāžu pārstāvjiem.. Lēmumiem par pasākumiem, kas attiecas uz ģenerāldirektoram uzliktiem disciplinārsodiem, jābūt pamatotiem, un informācija par tiem jānosūta Eiropas Parlamentam, Padomei un Uzraudzības komitejai.”e) Pievieno šādu 5. un 6. punktu:„5. Pēc Uzraudzības komitejas atzinuma saņemšanas ģenerāldirektors katru gadu nosaka Biroja darbības programmu un politikas prioritātes izmeklēšanas jomā.6. Ģenerāldirektors ar rakstisku dokumentu, nosakot šādas deleģēšanas nosacījumus un ierobežojumus, var savu funkciju veikšanai saskaņā ar 5. pantu, 6. panta 3. punktu, 7.b pantu un 10. panta 2. punktu deleģēt vienu vai vairākus Biroja darbiniekus.”13) 13. pantu aizstāj ar šādu:„13. pants FinansējumsBiroja apropriācijas, kuru kopējo summu iekļauj Eiropas Kopienu vispārējā budžeta daļā, īpašā budžeta pozīcijā, kas paredzēta Komisijai, sīki norādītas minētās daļas pielikumā.Biroja personāla plāns ir pievienots Komisijas personāla plāna pielikumā.”14) 14. pantu aizstāj ar šādu:„14. pants Kontroles padomdevējs1. Biroja ģenerāldirektors pēc Uzraudzības komitejas priekšlikuma izraugās kontroles padomdevēju uz piecu gadu termiņu bez iespējas tikt ieceltam atkārtoti. Uzraudzības komiteja priekšlikumu izstrādā, pamatojoties uz sarakstu, kurā iekļauti vairāki kandidāti, kas atlasīti konkursā.2. Kontroles padomdevējs ir pilnīgi neatkarīgs savu pienākumu izpildē. Veicot savus pienākumus, viņš nelūdz un nepieņem nekādus norādījumus. Biroja ietvaros tas neveic nekādus citus uzdevumus kā vien tos, kas saistīti ar procedūru ievērošanu.Pirms disciplinārsoda noteikšanas kontroles padomdevējam Biroja ģenerāldirektors apspriežas ar Uzraudzības komiteju.3. Ikviena persona, kuru izmeklēšanā uzskata par personīgi iesaistītu, var lūgt kontroles padomdevējam sniegt atzinumu attiecībā uz procesuālajām garantijām, kādas paredzētas 6. panta 5. punktā un 7.a pantā. Kontroles padomdevējs var paust atzinumu par šiem jautājumiem arī pēc savas ierosmes.4. Biroja ģenerāldirektors vēršas pie Kontroles padomdevēja ar lūgumu sniegt atzinumu gadījumos, kas paredzēti 6. pantā, 7. pantā un 7.a panta 2. punkta trešajā daļā. Turklāt Biroja ģenerāldirektors var vērsties pie kontroles padomdevēja ar jebkādu pieprasījumu attiecībā uz izmeklēšanas kontroli.5. Kontroles padomdevējs regulāri sniedz Uzraudzības komitejai ziņojumu par savu darbību, tas regulāri sniedz Uzraudzības komitejai un Komisijai statistikas un analīzes ziņojumus par jautājumiem, kas saistīti ar izmeklēšanas ilgumu, kā arī procesuālajām garantijām. Kontroles padomdevēja ziņojumi neattiecas uz konkrētām lietām, par kurām tiek veikta izmeklēšana.”15) 15. pantu svītro.16) Iekļauj šādu 15.a un 15. b pantu:„15.a pants Izpildes pasākumiIzpildes pasākumus attiecībā uz procesuālo garantiju piemērošanu Biroja administratīvajā izmeklēšanā tā, kā paredzēts šajā regulā, pieņem saskaņā ar 15.b panta 2. punktā noteikto regulatīvo procedūru.15.b pants Komiteja1. Komisijai palīdz komiteja, kas izveidota saskaņā ar Padomes Regulas (EK) Nr. 515/97 43. pantu*.2. Ja ir atsauce uz šo punktu, piemēro Lēmuma 1999/468/EK 5. un 7. pantu, ņemot vērā minētā lēmuma 8. panta noteikumus.Lēmuma 1999/468/EK 5. panta 6. punktā paredzētais termiņš ir trīs mēneši.3. Komiteja pieņem savu reglamentu._____________* OV L 82, 22.3.1997., 1. lpp.”2. pantsRegulas (EK) Nr. 1073/1999 12. panta 1. punkta noteikumi, kā grozīti ar šo regulu, neattiecas uz Biroja ģenerāldirektoru, kas pilda savus pienākumus šīs regulas spēkā stāšanās dienā, kura pilnvaras tika atjaunotas uz pieciem gadiem.3. pantsŠī regula stājas spēkā [...] dienā pēc tās publicēšanas Eiropas Savienības Oficiālajā Vēstnesī .Šī regula uzliek saistības kopumā un ir tieši piemērojama visās dalībvalstīs.Briselē, [...]Eiropas Parlamenta vārdā Padomes vārdā[...] [...]priekšsēdētājs priekšsēdētājsTiesību akta finanšu pārskats1. PRIEKŠLIKUMA NOSAUKUMS:Grozījumu izdarīšana Regulās (EK) Nr. 1073/1999 un (Euratom) Nr. 1074/19992. ABM/ABBAttiecīgās politikas jomas un saistītās darbības:24.01 Administratīvie izdevumi krāpšanas apkarošanas politikas jomā24.02 Krāpšanas apkarošana3. BUDŽETA POZĪCIJAS3.1. Budžeta pozīcijas (darbības pozīcijas un atbilstošās tehniskās un administratīvās palīdzības pozīcijas (ex-BA pozīcijas)), tostarp šādas:24.010600.03.01.00 Izdevumi, kas radušies Uzraudzības komitejas locekļu pilnvaru rezultātā3.2. Darbības un finansiālās ietekmes ilgums:Ilgums nav noteikts. Ietekmes nav.3.3. Budžeta apraksts (pievienot rindas pēc vajadzības)Budžeta pozīcija | Izdevumu veids | Jauns | EBTA iemaksas | Kandidātvalstu iemaksas | Finanšu perspektīvas pozīcija |24.0106 | Neobligāti | NDA[13] | NAV | NAV | NAV | N° 5 |4. RESURSU KOPSAVILKUMS4.1. Finanšu resursi4.1.1. Saistību apropriāciju (SA) un maksājumu apropriāciju (MA) kopsavilkumsmiljoni EUR (līdz 3 zīmēm aiz komata)Izdevumu veids | Iedaļa Nr. | Gads n | n +1 | n + 2 | n +3 | n +4 | n + 5 un turpmāk | Kopā |Darbības izdevumi[14] |Saistību apropriācijas (SA) | 8.1 | a) |Maksājumu apropriācijas (MA) | b) |Pamatsummā ietvertie administratīvie izdevumi[15] |Tehniskā un administratīvā palīdzība (NDA) | 8.2.4 | c) |Pamatsummas kopapjoms |Saistību apropriācijas | a+c |Maksājumu apropriācijas | b+c |Pamatsummā neietvertie administratīvie izdevumi[16] |Cilvēkresursu un saistītie izdevumi (NDA) | 8.2.5 | d | 0,972 |Administratīvās izmaksas, izņemot cilvēkresursu un saistītos izdevumus, kas nav ietvertas pamatsummā (NDA) | 8.2.6 | e | 0,200 |Kopējās orientējošās darbības izmaksasSA KOPĀ, ieskaitot cilvēkresursu izmaksas | a+c+d+e | 1,172 |MA KOPĀ, ietverot cilvēkresursu izmaksas | b+c+d+e | 1,172 |Informācija par līdzfinansējumuNavmiljoni EUR (līdz 3 zīmēm aiz komata) Līdzfinansētāja struktūra | Gads n | n + 1 | n + 2 | n + 3 | n + 4 | n+5 un turpmāk | Kopā |........................ | f |SA KOPĀ, ieskaitot līdzfinansējumu | a+c+d+e+f |4.1.2. Atbilstība finanšu plānojumamx Priekšlikums saskan ar pašreizējo finanšu plānojumu.( Priekšlikumam nepieciešama finanšu plāna attiecīgās pozīcijas pārplānošana.( Saistībā ar šo priekšlikumu var būt jāpiemēro Iestāžu nolīguma noteikumi[17] (par elastības instrumentu vai finanšu plāna pārskatīšanu).4.1.3. Finansiālā ietekme uz ieņēmumiemx Priekšlikums finansiāli neietekmē ieņēmumus( Priekšlikumam ir finansiāla ietekme – ietekme uz ieņēmumiem ir šāda:Nav.miljoni EUR (līdz 1 zīmei aiz komata)Pirms darbības[Gads n-1] | Situācija pēc darbības |Cilvēkresursu kopskaits | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 |5. RAKSTUROJUMS UN MĒRĶISīks priekšlikuma konteksta apraksts jāsniedz paskaidrojuma rakstā. Šajā tiesību akta finanšu pārskata iedaļā jābūt šādai papildu informācijai:5.1. Jāīsteno īstermiņā vai ilgtermiņāRegulu (EK) Nr. 1073/1999 un (Euratom) Nr. 1074/1999 grozījumu priekšlikumus Komisija pieņēma 2004. gada 10. februārī, ņemot vērā 2003. gada aprīļa Biroja darbības novērtējuma ziņojumu un Komisijas priekšsēdētāja Prodi paziņojumus Eiropas Parlamentam 2003. gada septembrī un novembrī.Savos 2003. gada 22. decembra secinājumos Padome uzsvēra arī to, cik svarīgi ievērot noteikumus attiecībā uz pamattiesību aizsardzību.Revīzijas palāta pieņēma īpašo ziņojumu Nr. 1/2005 par to, kā tiek vadīts Birojs, un virkni ieteikumu, kā arī atzinumu Nr. 6/2005 par 2004. gada februāra priekšlikumiem.Turklāt Eiropas Parlaments 2005. gada 12. un 13. jūlijā rīkoja sabiedrisku izskatīšanu par Biroja stiprināšanu, un šajā sakarā Komisijas priekšsēdētāja vietnieks Kallas nāca klajā ar iniciatīvu. Likumdevējs cer šo iniciatīvu saņemt tuvākajā laikā.5.2. Pievienotā vērtība, ko rada Kopienas iesaistīšanās, un priekšlikuma saskanība ar citiem finanšu instrumentiem, iespējamā sinerģijaDažādi grozījumu priekšlikumu aspekti paredz radīt pievienot vērtību Kopienas līmenī salīdzinājumā ar pašreizējo situāciju, jo īpaši:- sadarbības iedibināšana starp iestādēm un Uzraudzības komiteju (11.a pants)- kontroles padomdevēja izraudzīšanās (14. pants).Saderība ar Finanšu regulu (jo īpaši 13. pants).5.3. Priekšlikuma mērķi, gaidāmie rezultāti un attiecīgie rādītāji uz darbības jomām balstītas pārvaldības kontekstā5.4. Īstenošanas kārtība (orientējoši)Norādīt še turpmāk izvēlēto(ās) īstenošanas metodi(s)[19].X Centralizēta pārvaldībaX tieši īsteno Komisija( netieši, deleģējot to:( izpildaģentūrām,( Kopienu izveidotām organizācijām, kas minētas Finanšu regulas 185. pantā,( publiskā sektora organizācijām / organizācijām, kas darbojas sabiedrības interesēs.( Dalīta vai decentralizēta pārvaldība( ar dalībvalstīm( ar trešām valstīm( Pārvaldība, ko īsteno kopīgi ar starptautiskām organizācijām (norādīt tās)Piezīmes:6. KONTROLE UN NOVĒRTĒŠANA6.1. Kontroles sistēmaEiropas Parlaments un Padome izvērtēs OLAF situāciju, jo īpaši ņemot vērā turpmākos ziņojumus.6.2. Novērtēšana6.2.1. Iepriekšējā vērtēšana ( ex-ante )6.2.2. Pasākumi, kas veicami pēc starpposma novērtējuma / paveiktā novērtējuma ( ex-post ) (ņemot vērā līdzīgu iepriekšējo pieredzi)Skat. 5.1. punktā.6.2.3. Turpmākās vērtēšanas nosacījumi un biežumsPapildus pienākumiem, kurus negroza ar šiem priekšlikumiem, Kontroles padomdevējs regulāri sniegs pārskatu par savu darbību Uzraudzības komitejai, kuru turklāt Biroja ģenerāldirektors regulāri informēs par Biroja veikto izmeklēšanas darbību.7. KRĀPŠANAS APKAROŠANAS PASĀKUMIĪstenošana saskaņā ar jauno Finanšu regulu.Regulas (EK) Nr. 1073/1999 piemērošana.8. ZIŅAS PAR RESURSIEM8.1. Priekšlikuma mērķi finansiālo izmaksu izteiksmēSaistību apropriācijas miljonos EUR (līdz 3 zīmēm aiz komata)Gads n | Gads n+1 | Gads n+2 | Gads n+3 | Gads n+4 | Gads n+5 |Ierēdņi vai pagaidu darbinieki9 (XX 01 01) | A*/AD | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 |B*, C*/AST | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |Personāls, ko finansē10 atbilstoši XX 01 02. pantam |Pārējais personāls, ko finansē11 pēc panta XX 01 04/05 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |Kopā | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 |Uzraudzības komitejai pašlaik ir piešķirti 8 amati (3 A, 2 C, 3A.T) + 1 palīgdarbinieks.8.2.2. No darbības izrietošo uzdevumu aprakstsŠajā posmā nav paredzēts iezīmēt papildu līdzekļus kontroles padomdevēja uzdevumiem.8.2.3. Cilvēkresursu avoti (atbilstoši Civildienesta noteikumiem)(Ja norādīts vairāk nekā viens avots, lūdzu norādīt amatu skaitu saistībā ar katru avotu.)X Amata vietas, kas patlaban iedalītas programmas pārvaldības vajadzībām un kas jāaizstāj ar citām vai kam jāpagarina termiņš, uz kādu tās iedalītas( Amati, kas n gadam paredzēti iepriekš saskaņā ar gada stratēģisko plānošanu un sastādot provizorisko budžeta projektu( Amati, kas pieprasāmi, veicot nākamā gada stratēģisko plānošanu un sastādot provizorisko budžeta projektu( Amati, kas pārceļami no esošajiem vadības dienesta resursiem (iekšējā pārcelšana)( Amati, kas nepieciešami n gadam, bet nav paredzēti, veicot konkrētā gada stratēģisko plānošanu un sastādot provizorisko budžeta projektu8.2.4. Pārējie administratīvie izdevumi, kas ietverti pamatsummā (XX 01 04/05 – Administratīvās pārvaldības izdevumi)miljoni EUR (līdz 3 zīmēm aiz komata)Budžeta pozīcija (numurs un nosaukums) | Gads n | Gads n+1 | Gads n+2 | Gads n+3 | Gads n+4 | Gads n+5 un turpmāk | Kopā |1. Tehniskā un administratīvā palīdzība (ietverot attiecīgās personāla izmaksas) |Izpildaģentūras12 |Cita veida tehniskā un administratīvā palīdzība |- intra muros |- extra muros |Tehniskā un administratīvā palīdzība – izdevumi kopā |8.2.5. Cilvēkresursu izmaksas un saistītās izmaksas, kas nav ietvertas pamatsummāmiljoni EUR (līdz 3 zīmēm aiz komata)Cilvēkresursu veids | Gads n | Gads n+1 | Gads n+2 | Gads n+3 | Gads n+4 | Gads n+5 un turpmāk |Ierēdņi un pagaidu darbinieki (XX 01 01) | 0,864 |Personāls, ko finansē atbilstīgi XX 01 02. pantam (palīgpersonāls, valsts norīkotie eksperti, ārštata darbinieki u.c.) (norādīt budžeta pozīciju) | 0,108 |Cilvēkresursu un saistītās izmaksas kopā (NAV ietvertas pamatsummā) | 0,972 |Aprēķins — Ierēdņi un pagaidu darbiniekiVajadzības gadījumā jāsniedz norāde uz 8.2.1. punktu9 x 108 000 = 972 000Aprēķins - Personāls, ko finansē atbilstīgi XX 01 02. pantamVajadzības gadījumā jāsniedz norāde uz 8.2.1. punktu8.2.6. Pārējie administratīvie izdevumi, kas nav ietverti pamatsummā.miljoni EUR (līdz 3 zīmēm aiz komata)Gads n | Gads n+1 | Gads n+2 | Gads n+3 | Gads n+4 | Gads n+5 un turpmāk | Kopā |XX 01 02 11 01 – Komandējumi |XX 01 02 11 02 – Sanāksmes un konferences | 0,200 | 0,200 | 0,200 | 0,200 | 0,200 | 0,200 |XX 01 02 11 03 - Komitejas13 |XX 01 02 11 04 – Pētījumi un konsultācijas |XX 01 02 11 05 – Informācijas sistēmas |2. Pārējie pārvaldības izdevumi kopā (XX 01 02 11) |3. Pārējie administratīva rakstura izdevumi (precizēt, norādot budžeta pozīciju) |Administratīvie izdevumi kopā, izņemot cilvēkresursu un saistītās izmaksas (NAV ietverti pamatsummā) |Aprēķins - Citas administratīvās izmaksas, kas nav ietvertas pamatsummāAprēķins par Uzraudzības komitejas sanāksmēm: 10 x 20 000 = 200 000[1] OV L 136, 31.5.1999., 1. lpp.[2] OV L 136, 31.5.1999., 8. lpp.[3] OV L 136, 31.5.1999., 20. lpp.[4] COM(2003) 154 galīgā redakcija.[5] 2003. gada 4. novembra Rezolūcija par Biroja krāpšanas apkarošanai darbības novērtējumu; COM(2003) 154 – 2002/2237 (INI). 2004. gada 29. janvāra Rezolūcija par Komisijas pasākumiem, lai veiktu pasākumus attiecībā uz apsvērumiem, kas pievienoti 2001. gada budžeta izpildes apstiprinājumam COM(2003) 651 - C5-0536/2003 – 2003/2200 (DEC).[6] COM(2004) 103 un 104.[7] Īpašais ziņojums Nr. 1/2005 (OV C 202, 18.8.2005., 1. lpp.), ko Padome apstiprinājusi savos 2005. gada 8. novembra secinājumos.[8] Atzinums 6/2005; OV C 202, 18.8.2005., 33. lpp.[9] OV C [...], [...], [...] lpp.[10] OV C [...], [...], [...] lpp.[11] OV L 292, 15.11.1996., 2. lpp.[12] OV L 184, 17.7.1999., 23. lpp.[13] Nediferencētas apropriācijas.[14] Izdevumi, uz kuriem neattiecas nodaļa xx 01 attiecīgajā sadaļā xx.[15] Izdevumi, uz kuriem attiecas pants xx 01 04 sadaļā xx.[16] Izdevumi, uz kuriem attiecas nodaļa xx 01, izņemot pantus xx 01 04 un xx 01 05.[17] Skatīt Iestāžu nolīguma 19. un 24. punktu.[18] Ja nepieciešams, t.i., ja darbība ilgst vairāk nekā 6 gadus, pievienot papildu ailes.[19] Ja norādītas vairākas metodes, sniedziet precizējumus šā punkta sadaļā „Piezīmes”.8 Kā aprakstīts sadaļā 5.3.9 Kuru izmaksas ne aptver pamatsumma.10 Kuru izmaksas ne aptver pamatsumma.11 Kuru izmaksas aptver pamatsumma.12 Ir jānorāda attiecīgā tiesību akta finanšu pārskats, kas konkrēti saistīts ar attiecīgo(ajām) izpildaģentūru(ām).13 Precizēt komitejas veidu, kā arī grupu, pie kuras tā pieder.


type: wikipedia

text:
Ο Ράμι Σαάρι (17 Σεπτεμβρίου 1963) είναι Ισραηλινός ποιητής, μεταφραστής και γλωσσολόγος.
 Γεννήθηκε στις 17 Σεπτεμβρίου του 1963 στην Πέταχ Τικβά του Ισραήλ και πέρασε τα παιδικά του χρόνια στην Αργεντινή και στην πατρίδα του. Σπούδασε και δίδαξε γλωσσολογία, σημιτικές και φιννο-ουγγρικές γλώσσες στη Φινλανδία, την Ουγγαρία και το Ισραήλ. Το 2003 του απονεμήθηκε ο τίτλος του Δόκτορος γλωσσολογίας (θέμα διδακτορικής διατριβής: "Οι προθέσεις στο σύστημα της μαλτέζικης γλώσσας"). Δουλεύει ως μεταφραστής για διάφορους εκδοτικούς οίκους και είναι ο αρχισυντάκτης της Ισραηλινής σελίδας του Διαδικτύου https://web.archive.org/web/20060208094134/http://israel.poetryinternational.org/
 Ο Σαάρι ο οποίος έμεινε και στην Αθήνα έχει εκδώσει μέχρι στιγμής 12 ποιητικές συλλογές. Το 1996 και το 2003 του απονεμήθηκε το Κρατικό Βραβείο Ποίησης του Ισραήλ και το 2006 το Βραβείο Τσερνιχόβσκυ για τις μεταφράσεις του. Το 2010 του απονεμήθηκαν το Βραβείο Μετάφρασης της Φινλανδίας για τις μεταφράσεις του καθώς και το Βραβείο της Ακαδημίας της Εβραϊκής Γλώσσας για την ποίησή του. Τα ποιήματά του έχουν μεταφραστεί σε πολλές γλώσσες και το 2006 κυκλοφόρησε από τις εκδόσεις Οξύ μια ανθολογία της ποίησής του στα ελληνικά ("Κάτω από τις πατούσες της βροχής") σε μετάφραση της Χρυσούλας Παπαδοπούλου. Το 2017 κυκλοφόρησε από τις εκδόσεις Βακχικόν μια καινούργια και σύγχρονη ανθολογία της ποίησής του στα ελληνικά ("Ο Προσκυνητής του Βυζαντίου") σε μετάφραση του Θοδωρή Σκλαβούνου και με εισαγωγή της Αγγελικής Δημουλή. Ακόμα πιο καινούργια και σύγχρονη ανθολογία της ποίησής του στα ελληνικά κυκλοφόρησε από τις εκδόσεις Βακχικόν το 2019 σε μετάφραση της Ματίνας Σαξώνη.
 Ο Σαάρι έχει μεταφράσει στα εβραϊκά παραπάνω από ογδόντα βιβλία από τα ελληνικά, αλβανικά, ισπανικά, εσθονικά, πορτογαλικά, ουγγρικά, τουρκικά και φινλανδικά. 'Εχει μεταφράσει ποιήματα πολλών Ελλήνων ποιητών, μεταξύ των οποίων συγκαταλέγονται η Κατερίνα Αγγελάκη-Ρουκ, η Γιώτα Αργυροπούλου, ο Νίκος-Αλέξης Ασλάνογλου, ο Ιωσήφ Βεντούρα, ο Χάρις Βλαβιανός, η Πίτσα Γαλάζη, η Κική Δημουλά, η Αγγελική Δημουλή, ο Οδυσσέας Ελύτης, ο Στάθης Καββάδας, ο Νίκος Καββαδίας, ο Λεωνίδας Κακάρογλου, ο Γιώργος Κακουλίδης, ο Βασίλης Καραβίτης, ο Κώστας Καρυωτάκης, ο Πάνος Κυπαρίσσης, η Μαρία Λαϊνά, ο Πρόδρομος Μάρκογλου, η Τζένη Μαστοράκη, ο Μάρκος Μέσκος, ο Στρατής Πασχάλης, ο Γιώργος Σεφέρης, ο Μίλτος Σαχτούρης, η Αγγελική Σιγούρου, ο Χρήστος Σιορίκης, ο Σωτήρης Τριβιζάς, ο Γιάννης Υφαντής, ο Αργύρης Χιόνης, ο Γιώργος Χρονάς, Ντίνος Χριστιανόπουλος και άλλοι (https://www.ramisaari.com/yevanit-shira/). Επίσης έχει μεταφράσει πεζά κείμενα των συγγραφέων Ρέα Γαλανάκη, Γιώργος Ιωάννου (λογοτέχνης), Βασίλη Κωνσταντίνου, Κώστα Ταχτσή, Μάκη Τσίτα και Δήμητρας Χριστοδούλου (https://www.ramisaari.com/yevanit-siporet/).
 Έργο
 Να, βρήκα το σπίτι μου (1988)
 Άντρες στο σταυροδρόμι (1991)
 Η πορεία του τολμηρού πόνου (1997)
 Το ζωντανό βιβλίο (2001)
 Πόσος, πόσος πόλεμος (2002)
 Ο πέμπτος σογκούν (2005)
 Οι κύκλοι της ζωής (2008)
 Εισαγωγή στην σεξουαλική γλωσσολογία (2013)
 Γιοι κι εγγονοί του Καβάφη (2015)
 Μηνύματα από το Σκασιλαμουστάν (2016)
 Η Ιωσήφα και οι παροιμίες ταξιδεύουν στη Μεσόγειο (2019)
 'Ενζυμα της ψυχής και προγραμματισμένοι καιροί (2021)
 Ολόκληρα βιβλία μεταφρασμένα από τον ποιητή από τα ελληνικά στα εβραϊκά
 Πάτυ εκ του Πετρούλα του Μάκη Τσίτα, διηγήματα (1997)
 Για ένα φιλότιμο του Γιώργου Ιωάννου, διηγήματα (2002)
 Ο βίος του Ισμαήλ Φερίκ Πασά της Ρέας Γαλανάκη, μυθιστόρημα (2006)
 Ισορροπία σε καλώδιο του Ιωσήφ Βεντούρα, ποιητική συλλογή (2008)
 Το πιο αρκετό του Γιάννη Ρίτσου, ποιητική συλλογή (2014)
 Πωλείται του Βασίλη Κωνσταντίνου, μυθιστόρημα (2018)
 Παραπομπές
 Εξωτερικοί σύνδεσμοι
 https://www.ramisaari.com/rami-saari/ - Επίσημη σελίδα του ποιητή
 https://web.archive.org/web/20120308113514/http://library.osu.edu/projects/hebrew-lexicon/00198 – Σύγχρονη Εβραϊκή λογοτεχνία
 https://www.culturenow.gr/o-proskynitis-toy-vyzantioy-rami-saari/ - Για το ελληνικό ανθολόγιο του ποιητή
 https://ekdoseis.vakxikon.gr/shop/ekdoseis/vakxikon-poetry/o-proskynhths-tou-byzantiou/ - Σχόλια της ποιήτριας Αγγελικής Δημουλή για το έργο του Σαάρι
 Ισραηλινοί ποιητές
 Ισραηλινοί γλωσσολόγοι
 Εβραίοι ποιητές
 Εβραίοι γλωσσολόγοι
 Μεταφραστές