text:
 Important legal notice
 |
 22004A1228(01)
 Agreement between the European Community and the Government of Ukraine on trade in certain steel products
 Official Journal L 384 , 28/12/2004 P. 0023 - 0040
 Agreementbetween the European Community and the Government of Ukraine on trade in certain steel productsTHE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY, hereinafter referred to as "the Community",of the one part, andTHE GOVERNMENT OF UKRAINE,of the other part,together referred to as "the Parties",HAVE AGREED AS FOLLOWS:Article 11. This agreement applies to trade in the steel products set out in Annex I to this Agreement originating within the Parties.2. Trade in steel products not set out in Annex I shall not be subject to quantitative limits and shall be governed by the relevant provisions of the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement, in particular those relating to anti-dumping procedures and safeguard measures.3. In the case of a subject matter which is not covered by this Agreement, the relevant provisions of the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement shall apply.Article 21. The Parties agree to establish and maintain for the period of validity of the present Agreement quantitative arrangements fixing the limits set out in Annex II of this Agreement on Ukrainian exports to the Community of the products set out in Annex I. Such exports shall be subject to a double-checking system as specified in Protocol A of this Agreement (hereinafter referred to as "Protocol A").2. The Parties reiterate their commitment to achieve complete liberalisation of trade in respect of the steel products set out in Annex I as soon as the conditions have been established.3. For the product groups included in Annex I, quantities covered by imports authorisations issued by the Community, on the basis of the Council Decision 2003/893/EC of 15 December 2003, as from 1 January 2004 until the entry into force of this Agreement, will be deducted from the quantitative limits set out in Annex II.4. Imports of quantities in excess of those mentioned in Annex II shall be authorised where the Community industry is unable to meet the internal demand and results in a shortage of supply for one or more products listed in Annex I. Consultations shall take place immediately at the request of either Party to determine the level of the shortage. Following the conclusions of the consultations and on the basis of objective evidence, the Community shall instigate its internal procedures to increase the quantities set out in Annex II.5. Each Party may, at any time, request consultations concerning:- the levels of the quantitative limits set out in Annex II, where the conditions in respect of the products covered by Annex I have substantially deteriorated or improved;- the possibility of transferring unused amounts set out in Annex II from under-utilised product groups to other groups.Article 31. Imports into the customs territory of the Community for free circulation of the products set out in Annex I shall be subject to the production of an export licence issued by the authorities of Ukraine and to proof of origin in accordance with the provisions of Protocol A.2. Imports into the customs territory of the Community of the products set out in Annex I shall not be subject to the quantitative limits set out in Annex II provided they are declared to be for re-export outside the Community in the same state or after processing, within the administrative system of control which exists within the Community.Article 41. With a view to rendering the double-checking system as effective as possible and to minimize the possibilities for abuse and circumvention:- the Community authorities shall inform the Ukrainian authorities by the 28th of each month of the import authorizations issued during the preceding month;- the Ukrainian authorities shall inform the Community by the 28th of each month of the export licences issued during the preceding month.In the event of any significant discrepancy taking account of the time factors involved in respect of such information either Party may request consultations which shall be opened immediately.2. Without prejudice to paragraph 1 and with a view to ensuring the effective functioning of this Agreement, the Parties agree to take all necessary steps to prevent, to investigate and to take any necessary legal and/or administration action against circumvention, notably by transhipment, re-routing, false declaration concerning the country or place of origin, falsification of documents, false declaration concerning quantities, description or classification of merchandise. Accordingly, the Parties agree to establish the necessary legal provisions and administrative procedures permitting effective action to be taken against such circumvention, which shall include the adoption of legally binding corrective measures against exporters and/or importers involved.3. Should either Party believe on the basis of information available that this Agreement is being circumvented, it may request consultations with the other Party which shall be held immediately.4. Pending the results of the consultations referred to in paragraph 3, the Government of Ukraine shall, as a precautionary measure, and if so requested by the Community, take all necessary measures to ensure that, where sufficient evidence of circumvention is provided, adjustments of the quantitative limits liable to be agreed following the consultations referred to in paragraph 3, shall be carried out for the calendar year in which the request for consultations under paragraph 3 was made, or for the following year, if the limit for that calendar year is exhausted.5. Should the Parties be unable in the course of the consultations referred to in paragraph 3 to reach a mutually satisfactory solution, the Community shall have the right, where there is sufficient evidence that products set out in Annex I originating in Ukraine have been imported in circumvention of this Agreement, to set off the relevant quantities against the quantitative limits established under Annex II.6. Should the Parties be unable in the course of the consultations referred to in paragraph 3 to reach a mutually satisfactory solution, the Community shall have the right, where sufficient evidence shows false declaration concerning quantities description or classification has occurred, to refuse to import the products in question.7. The Parties agree to cooperate fully to prevent and to address effectively all problems arising from circumvention of this Agreement.Article 51. The quantitative limits established under this Agreement on imports of steel products set out in Annex I into the Community shall not be broken down by the Community into regional shares.2. The Parties shall cooperate in order to prevent sudden and prejudicial changes in traditional trade flows into the Community. Should a sudden and prejudicial change in traditional trade flows arise (including regional concentration or the loss of traditional customers), the Community will be entitled to request consultations in order to find a satisfactory solution to the problem. Such consultations shall be held immediately.3. Ukraine shall endeavour to ensure that exports into the Community of products set out in Annex I are spaced out as evenly as possible over the year. Should a sudden and prejudicial surge of imports arise, the Community will be entitled to request consultations in order to find a satisfactory solution to the problem. Such consultations shall be held immediately.4. In addition to the obligation contained in paragraph 3, and without prejudice to the consultations foreseen by Article 2(7), where licences issued by the Ukrainian authorities have reached 90 % of the quantitative limits, either Party may request consultations. Such consultations shall be held immediately. Pending the outcome of such consultations the Ukrainian authorities may continue to issue export licences for the products set out in Annex I provided they do not exceed the quantities set out in Annex II.Article 61. Where any product set out in Annex I is being imported into the Community from Ukraine under such conditions as to cause or threaten to cause substantial injury to Community producers of like products, the Community shall supply Ukraine with all relevant information with a view to seeking a solution acceptable to both Parties. The Parties shall commence consultations promptly.2. Should the consultations referred to in paragraph 1 above fail to lead to agreement within 30 days of the Community's request for consultations, the Community may utilise the right to take action concerning safeguard measures pursuant to the provisions of the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement.3. Notwithstanding the provisions of this Agreement, the provisions of Article 19 of the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement shall apply.Article 71. The classification of the products covered by this Agreement is based on the tariff and statistical nomenclature of the Community (hereinafter called the "combined nomenclature", or in abbreviated form "CN"). Any amendment to the combined nomenclature made in accordance with the procedures in force in the Community concerning the products set out in Annex I or any decision relating to the classification of goods shall not have the effect of reducing the quantitative limits of the products set out Annex II.2. The origin of the products covered by this Agreement shall be determined in accordance with the rules in force in the Community. Any amendment to these rules of origin shall be communicated to the Government of Ukraine and shall not have the effect of reducing the quantitative limits of this Agreement. The procedures for control of the origin of the products referred to above are laid down in Protocol A.Article 81. Without prejudice to the periodic exchange of information on export licences and import authorizations pursuant to Article 4(1), the Parties agree to exchange available statistical information relating to trade in the products set out in Annex I at appropriate intervals, taking account of the shortest periods in which the information in question is prepared, which shall cover export licences and import authorizations issued pursuant to Article 3 and import and export statistics in respect of the products in question.2. Either Party may request consultations in the event of any significant discrepancy between the information exchanged.Article 91. Without prejudice to provisions concerning consultations foreseen in respect of specific circumstances in preceding Articles, consultations shall be held on any problems arising from the application of this Agreement at the request of either Party. Any consultations shall take place in a spirit of cooperation and with a desire to reconcile the differences between the Parties.2. Where this Agreement provides that consultations shall be held immediately, the Parties undertake to use all reasonable means to ensure that this is achieved.3. All other consultations shall be governed by the following provisions:- any request for consultations shall be notified in writing to the other Party,- where appropriate, the request shall be followed within a reasonable period by a report setting out the reasons for the consultations,- consultations shall begin within one month from the date of receipt of the request,- consultations shall endeavour to arrive at a mutually acceptable result within one month of their commencement, unless the period is extended by agreement between the Parties.Article 101. This Agreement shall enter into force on the date of its signature. It shall be applicable until 31 December 2004 subject to any modifications agreed by the Parties and unless it is denounced in accordance with the provisions of paragraph 3 of this Article.2. Either Party may at any time propose modifications to this Agreement which shall require the mutual consent of the Parties and take effect as agreed by them.3. Either Party may denounce this Agreement, provided that at least six months' notice is given. In that event, the Agreement shall come to an end on the expiry of the period of notice and the limits established by this Agreement shall be reduced on a pro rata basis up to the date on which denunciation takes effect unless the Parties decide otherwise by common agreement.4. Annexes I and II, declarations 1, 2, 3 and 4, the agreed minute and Protocol A attached to this Agreement shall form an integral part thereof.Article 11This Agreement shall be drawn up in duplicate in the Czech, Danish, Dutch, English, Estonian, Finnish, French, German, Greek, Hungarian, Italian, Latvian, Lithuanian, Maltese, Polish, Portuguese, Slovak, Slovenian, Spanish, Swedish and Ukrainian languages, each text being equally authentic.Hecho en Bruselas, elV Bruselu dneUdfærdiget i Bruxelles denGeschehen zu Brüssel amBrüsselis'Eγινε στην Βρυξέλλες, στιςDone at Brussels,Fait à Bruxelles, leFatto a Bruxelles, addìBriselē,Priimta BriuselyjeKelt Brüsszelben,Magħmul fi Brussel,Gedaan te Brussel,Sporządzono w Brukseli, dniaFeito em Bruxelas,V BruseliV Bruslju,Tehty BrysselissäUdfärdat i Bryssel denВчинено в м.Por la Comunidad EuropeaZa Evropské společenstvíFor Det Europæiske FællesskabFür die Europäische GemeinschaftEuroopa Ühenduse nimelΓια την Eυρωπαϊκή KoινóτηταFor the European CommunityPour la Communauté européennePer la Comunità europeaEiropas Kopienas vārdāEuropos bendrijos varduAz Európai Közösség részérőlGħall-Komunità EwropeaVoor de Europese GemeenschapW imieniu Wspólnoty EuropejskiejPela Comunidade EuropeiaZa Európske spoločenstvoZa Evropsko skupnostEuroopan yhteisön puolestaFör Europeiska gemenskapenЗа Eвропейське СпiвтовариствоЗа Кабiнет Мiнiстрiв Украïни--------------------------------------------------


type: legislation

jurisdiction: EU

text:
 3.7.2019
 SL
 Uradni list Evropske unije
 L 179/9
 IZVEDBENA UREDBA KOMISIJE (EU) 2019/1130
 z dne 2. julija 2019
 o enotnih pogojih za usklajeno uporabo teritorialnih tipologij v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 1059/2003 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
 EVROPSKA KOMISIJA JE –
 ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije,
 ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 1059/2003 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 26. maja 2003 o oblikovanju skupne klasifikacije statističnih teritorialnih enot (NUTS) (1) in zlasti člena 4b(5) Uredbe,
 ob upoštevanju naslednjega:
 (1)
 Uredba (ES) št. 1059/2003 vzpostavlja pravni okvir za regionalno klasifikacijo Unije, da se omogočijo zbiranje, obdelava in razširjanje usklajene regionalne statistike.
 (2)
 S členom 4b Uredbe (ES) št. 1059/2003 je bila Komisija pooblaščena, da na ravni Unije določi enotne pogoje za usklajeno uporabo teritorialnih tipologij iz navedenega člena.
 (3)
 Navedeni pogoji bi morali vsebovati opis metode za dodeljevanje tipologij na ravni posameznih lokalnih upravnih enot in ravni NUTS (nomenklatura statističnih teritorialnih enot) 3.
 (4)
 Pri uporabi enotnih pogojev je treba upoštevati geografske, socialno-ekonomske, zgodovinske, kulturne in okoljske razmere.
 (5)
 Ukrepi iz te uredbe so v skladu z mnenjem Odbora za evropski statistični sistem –
 SPREJELA NASLEDNJO UREDBO:
 Člen 1
 Enotni pogoji za usklajeno uporabo tipologije na podlagi mreže ter tipologij na ravni lokalnih upravnih enot in ravni NUTS 3 so določeni v Prilogi.
 Člen 2
 Ta uredba začne veljati dvajseti dan po objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
 Ta uredba je v celoti zavezujoča in se neposredno uporablja v vseh državah članicah.
 V Bruslju, 2. julija 2019
 Za Komisijo
 Predsednik
 Jean-Claude JUNCKER
 (1) UL L 154, 21.6.2003, str. 1.
 PRILOGA
 1.
 Enotni pogoji za usklajeno uporabo tipologije na podlagi mreže so naslednji:
 Element, kakor je določen v Uredbi (ES) št. 1059/2003
 Oznake
 Pogoji
 Tipologija na podlagi mreže
 „podeželske mrežne celice“ ali „mrežne celice z majhno gostoto“
 1 km2 velike mrežne celice z gostoto pod 300 prebivalcev/km2 in druge celice zunaj urbanih grozdov
 „urbani grozdi“ ali „grozdi z zmerno gostoto“
 sosednje (vključno z diagonalami) 1 km2 velike mrežne celice z gostoto vsaj 300 prebivalcev/km2 in najmanj 5 000 prebivalcev v grozdu
 „urbana središča“ ali „grozdi z veliko gostoto“
 sosednje (brez diagonal) 1 km2 velike mrežne celice znotraj „urbanih grozdov“ z gostoto vsaj 1 500 prebivalcev/km2 in najmanj 50 000 prebivalcev v grozdu po zapolnjevanju vrzeli
 2.
 Enotni pogoji za usklajeno uporabo tipologij na ravni lokalnih upravnih enot so naslednji:
 Element, kakor je določen v Uredbi (ES) št. 1059/2003
 Oznake
 Pogoji
 Stopnja urbanizacije (DEGURBA)
 „mestna območja“
 „mesta“ ali „gosto poseljena območja“
 Teritorialne enote na ravni lokalnih upravnih enot, v katerih vsaj 50 % prebivalstva živi v urbanih središčih.
 „kraji in predmestja“ ali „območja srednje gostote“
 Teritorialne enote na ravni lokalnih upravnih enot, v katerih manj kot 50 % prebivalstva živi v podeželskih mrežnih celicah in manj kot 50 % prebivalstva živi v urbanih središčih.
 „podeželska območja“ ali „redko poseljena območja“
 Teritorialne enote na ravni lokalnih upravnih enot, v katerih vsaj 50 % prebivalstva živi v podeželskih mrežnih celicah.
 Funkcionalna mestna območja
 „funkcionalna mestna območja“
 „mesta“
 Teritorialne enote na ravni lokalnih upravnih enot, opredeljene kot „mesta“ ali „gosto poseljena območja“.
 „območje dnevnih migracij“
 Teritorialne enote na ravni lokalnih upravnih enot, od katerih vsaj 15 % zaposlenega prebivalstva dnevno migrira v mesto, pri čemer so enklave vključene, eksklave pa izključene.
 Obalna območja
 „obalna območja“
 Teritorialne enote na ravni lokalnih upravnih enot, ki mejijo na morje ali imajo vsaj 50 % površine v razdalji 10 km od morja; enklave (neobalne lokalne upravne enote, obdane s sosednjimi obalnimi lokalnimi upravnimi enotami) se dodajo.
 „neobalna območja“
 Teritorialne enote na ravni lokalnih upravnih enot, ki niso „obalna območja“, tj. ki ne mejijo na morje, in imajo manj kot 50 % površine v razdalji 10 km od morja.
 3.
 Enotni pogoji za usklajeno uporabo tipologij na ravni NUTS 3 so naslednji:
 Element, kakor je določen v Uredbi (ES) št. 1059/2003
 Oznake
 Pogoji
 Mestno-podeželska tipologija
 „prevladujoče mestne regije“
 Teritorialne enote na ravni NUTS 3, v katerih vsaj 80 % prebivalstva živi v urbanih grozdih.
 „vmesne regije“
 Teritorialne enote na ravni NUTS 3, v katerih več kot 50 %, vendar manj kot 80 % prebivalstva živi v urbanih grozdih.
 „prevladujoče podeželske regije“
 Teritorialne enote na ravni NUTS 3, v katerih vsaj 50 % prebivalstva živi v podeželskih mrežnih celicah.
 Velemestna tipologija
 „velemestne regije“
 Ena ali več regij na ravni NUTS 3, v katerih vsaj 50 % prebivalstva živi na funkcionalnih mestnih območjih z vsaj 250 000 prebivalci.
 „nevelemestne regije“
 Regije na ravni NUTS 3, ki niso „velemestne regije“.
 Obalna tipologija
 „obalne regije“
 Regije na ravni NUTS 3, ki mejijo na morje, ali regije, v katerih vsaj 50 % prebivalstva živi v razdalji do 50 km od obale, ter regija Hamburg (Nemčija) na ravni NUTS 3.
 „neobalne regije“
 Regije na ravni NUTS 3, ki niso „obalne regije“.


type: contracts

text:
 22.5.2014
 LV
 Eiropas Savienības Oficiālais Vēstnesis
 L 154/5
 EEZ APVIENOTĀS KOMITEJAS LĒMUMS
 Nr. 215/2013
 (2013. gada 13. decembris),
 ar ko groza EEZ līguma I pielikumu (Veterinārijas un fitosanitārijas jautājumi)
 EEZ APVIENOTĀ KOMITEJA,
 ņemot vērā Līgumu par Eiropas Ekonomikas zonu (“EEZ līgums”) un jo īpaši tā 98. pantu,
 tā kā:
 (1)
 Komisijas 2013. gada 29. aprīļa Īstenošanas lēmums 2013/213/ES, ar ko groza Lēmumu 2010/221/ES attiecībā uz valsts pasākumu apstiprināšanu, lai nepieļautu austeru herpesvīrusa 1 μνar (OsHV-1 μνar) ievešanu konkrētās Īrijas un Apvienotās Karalistes zonās (1), ir jāiekļauj EEZ līgumā.
 (2)
 Šis lēmums attiecas uz tiesību aktiem veterinārijas jomā. Tiesību akti veterinārijas jomā neattiecas uz Lihtenšteinu, kamēr attiecībā uz Lihtenšteinu piemēro Eiropas Kopienas un Šveices Konfederācijas Nolīgumu par lauksaimniecības produktu tirdzniecību, kā tas noteikts EEZ līguma I pielikuma nozaru pielāgojumos. Tādēļ šis lēmums nav piemērojams Lihtenšteinai.
 (3)
 Tādēļ būtu attiecīgi jāgroza EEZ līguma I pielikums,
 IR PIEŅĒMUSI ŠO LĒMUMU.
 1. pants
 EEZ līguma I pielikuma I nodaļas 4.2. daļas 94. punktā (Komisijas Lēmums 2010/221/ES) pievieno šādu ievilkumu:
 “—
 32013 D 0213: Komisijas 2013. gada 29. aprīļa Īstenošanas lēmums 2013/213/ES (OV L 120, 1.5.2013., 16. lpp.).”
 2. pants
 Īstenošanas lēmuma 2013/213/ES teksts islandiešu un norvēģu valodā, kas jāpublicē Eiropas Savienības Oficiālā Vēstneša EEZ papildinājumā, ir autentisks.
 3. pants
 Šis lēmums stājas spēkā 2013. gada 14. decembrī, ja ir iesniegti visi paziņojumi saskaņā ar EEZ līguma 103. panta 1. punktu (2).
 4. pants
 Šo lēmumu publicē Eiropas Savienības Oficiālā Vēstneša EEZ iedaļā un tā EEZ papildinājumā.
 Briselē, 2013. gada 13. decembrī
 EEZ Apvienotās komitejas vārdā –
 priekšsēdētājs
 Thórir IBSEN
 (1) OV L 120, 1.5.2013., 16. lpp.
 (2) Konstitucionālās prasības nav norādītas.


text:
 29.6.2011
 BG
 Официален вестник на Европейския съюз
 L 169/23
 РЕГЛАМЕНТ ЗА ИЗПЪЛНЕНИЕ (ЕС) No 628/2011 НА КОМИСИЯТА
 от 28 юни 2011 година
 за определяне на фиксирани стойности при внос за определяне на входната цена на някои плодове и зеленчуци
 ЕВРОПЕЙСКАТА КОМИСИЯ,
 като взе предвид Договора за функционирането на Европейския съюз,
 като взе предвид Регламент (ЕО) No 1234/2007 на Съвета от 22 октомври 2007 г. за установяване на обща организация на селскостопанските пазари и относно специфични разпоредби за някои земеделски продукти („Общ регламент за ООП“) (1),
 като взе предвид Регламент за изпълнение (ЕС) No 543/2011 на Комисията от 7 юни 2011 г. за определяне на подробни правила за прилагането на Регламент (ЕО) No 1234/2007 на Съвета по отношение на секторите на плодовете и зеленчуците и на преработените плодове и зеленчуци (2), и по-специално член 136, параграф 1 от него,
 като има предвид, че:
 в изпълнение на резултатите от Уругвайския кръг от многостранни търговски преговори Регламент за изпълнение (ЕС) No 543/2011 посочва критериите за определяне от страна на Комисията на фиксирани стойности при внос от трети страни за продуктите и периодите, посочени в приложение XVI, част A към същия регламент,
 ПРИЕ НАСТОЯЩИЯ РЕГЛАМЕНТ:
 Член 1
 Фиксираните стойности при внос, посочени в член 136 от Регламент за изпълнение (ЕС) No 543/2011, са определени в приложението към настоящия регламент.
 Член 2
 Настоящият регламент влиза в сила на 29 юни 2011 година.
 Настоящият регламент е задължителен в своята цялост и се прилага пряко във всички държави-членки.
 Съставено в Брюксел на 28 юни 2011 година.
 За Комисията, от името на председателя,
 José Manuel SILVA RODRÍGUEZ
 Генерален директор на Генерална дирекция „Земеделие и развитие на селските райони“
 (1) ОВ L 299, 16.11.2007 г., стр. 1.
 (2) ОВ L 157, 15.6.2011 г., стр. 1.
 ПРИЛОЖЕНИЕ
 Фиксирани стойности при внос за определяне на входната цена на някои плодове и зеленчуци
 (EUR/100 kg)
 Код по КН
 Кодове на трети страни (1)
 Фиксирана вносна стойност
 0702 00 00
 AR
 23,1
 EC
 23,1
 MK
 48,7
 TR
 40,0
 ZZ
 33,7
 0707 00 05
 TR
 116,6
 ZZ
 116,6
 0709 90 70
 EC
 28,8
 TR
 113,1
 ZZ
 71,0
 0805 50 10
 AR
 59,8
 BR
 40,6
 TR
 68,6
 UY
 70,8
 ZA
 107,6
 ZZ
 69,5
 0808 10 80
 AR
 133,5
 BR
 77,6
 CA
 105,9
 CL
 96,2
 CN
 76,7
 NZ
 114,3
 US
 168,4
 UY
 64,1
 ZA
 94,8
 ZZ
 103,5
 0809 10 00
 AR
 89,7
 TR
 293,0
 XS
 152,4
 ZZ
 178,4
 0809 20 95
 TR
 337,3
 ZZ
 337,3
 0809 30
 EC
 116,4
 TR
 179,1
 XS
 55,8
 ZZ
 117,1
 (1) Номенклатура на страните, определена с Регламент (ЕО) No 1833/2006 на Комисията (ОВ L 354, 14.12.2006 г., стр. 19). Код „ZZ“ означава „друг произход“.


type: caselaw

text:
 12.10.2015
 ET
 Euroopa Liidu Teataja
 C 337/14
 6. juulil 2015 esitatud hagi – Austria versus komisjon
 (Kohtuasi T-356/15)
 (2015/C 337/17)
 Kohtumenetluse keel: saksa
 Pooled
 Hageja: Austria Vabariik (esindajad: C. Pesendorfer ja advokaat H. Kristoferitsch)
 Kostja: Euroopa Komisjon
 Nõuded
 Hageja palub Üldkohtul:
 —
 tühistada Euroopa Komisjoni 8. oktoobri 2014. aasta otsus (EL) abimeetme SA.34947 (2013/C) (ex 2013/N) kohta, mida Ühendkuningriik kavatseb rakendada Hinkley Point C tuumaelektrijaama toetuseks (teatavaks tehtud numbri C(2014) 7142 all) (ELT 2015, L 109, lk 44);
 —
 mõista kohtukulud välja komisjonilt.
 Väited ja peamised argumendid
 Hagi põhjenduseks esitab hageja kümme väidet.
 1.
 Esimene väide: ELTL artikli 107 lõike 3 punkti c ebaõige kohaldamine – väär turumääratlus ja ebaõige järeldus turutõrgete esinemise kohta
 Hageja leiab, et komisjon kiitis kavandatava riigiabi ELTL artikli 107 lõike 3 punkti c alusel ebaõigesti heaks, sest ta lähtub vääralt sellest, et eraldi on olemas tuumaenergia turg ja et sellel turul esinevad tõrked.
 2.
 Teine väide: ELTL artikli 107 lõike 3 punkti c rikkumine – tuumajaama ebaõige pidamine „uueks tehnoloogiaks”
 Siinkohal väidetakse, et otsus on tühine seetõttu, et komisjon tugineb ebaõigesti asjaolule, et vaidlusaluse tehnoloogia puhul on tegemist uue tehnoloogialahendusega.
 3.
 Kolmas väide: ELTL artikli 107 lõike 3 punkti c ebaõige kohaldamine – ebaõige järeldus, et tegemist on investeeringuteks ettenähtud abiga
 Kolmandas väites leiab hageja, et komisjon arvab ekslikult, et kavandatava meetme puhul on tegemist puhtalt investeeringuteks ettenähtud abiga; tegelikult on selle abi puhul tegemist palju enamaga kui puhtalt investeeringuteks ettenähtud abiga ja seetõttu – vastavalt Euroopa Kohtu praktikale – sobimatu tegevusabiga.
 4.
 Neljas väide: ELTL artikli 107 lõike 3 punkti c ebaõige kohaldamine – ühistes huvides oleva eesmärgi puudumine
 Siinkohal leiab hageja, et vaidlustatud otsus on ka seetõttu tühine, et erinevalt komisjoni arvamusest puudub selle abi heakskiitmiseks vajalik ühine huvi vastavalt ELTL artikli 107 lõike 3 punktile b.
 5.
 Viies väide: abi ei ole piisavalt kindlaks määratud
 Austria Vabariik tugineb oma hagis ka sellele, et komisjon ei ole abi piisavalt kindlaks määranud.
 6.
 Kuues väide: ELTL artikli 107 lõike 3 punkti c ebaõige kohaldamine – meetmed ei ole asjakohased
 Komisjoni põhjendused abi asjakohasuse kohta ei ole hageja arvates õiged ja arusaadavad, mistõttu on otsus ka seetõttu tühine.
 7.
 Seitsmes väide: hankemenetluse põhinõuete rikkumine
 Selles väites leiab hageja, et abi ei või heaks kiita ka seetõttu, et Ühendkuningriik ei ole läbi viinud avalikku hankemenetlust ning et ta on rikkunud liidu õigusest tulenevaid võrdse kohtlemise ja läbipaistvuse nõudeid.
 8.
 Kaheksas väide: rikutud on teatist garantiide kohta (1)
 Siinkohal väidab hageja, et riigiabi osana antud riiklikku garantiid ei ole hinnatud selles teatises sisalduvate kriteeriumide alusel.
 9.
 Üheksas väide: ELTL artikli 296 teises lõigus toodud põhjendamiskohustuse järgimata jätmine
 Lisaks on komisjon rikkunud – seejuures mitu korda ja tõsiselt – põhjendamiskohustust.
 10.
 Kümnes väide: rikutud on õigust olla ärakuulatud
 Lõpuks väidetakse, et rikutud on õigust olla ärakuulatud.
 (1) Komisjoni teatis [EÜ] artiklite 87 ja 88 kohaldamise kohta garantiidena antava riigiabi suhtes (ELT 2008, C 155, lk 10).


text:
 31.10.2019
 SK
 Úradný vestník Európskej únie
 L 279/22
 VYKONÁVACIE NARIADENIE KOMISIE (EÚ) 2019/1826
 z 25. októbra 2019,
 ktorým sa do registra chránených označení pôvodu a chránených zemepisných označení zapisuje názov [„Kaimiškas Jovarų alus“ (CHZO)]
 EURÓPSKA KOMISIA,
 so zreteľom na Zmluvu o fungovaní Európskej únie,
 so zreteľom na nariadenie Európskeho parlamentu a Rady (EÚ) č. 1151/2012 z 21. novembra 2012 o systémoch kvality pre poľnohospodárske výrobky a potraviny (1), a najmä na jeho článok 52 ods. 2,
 keďže:
 (1)
 V súlade s článkom 50 ods. 2 písm. a) nariadenia (EÚ) č. 1151/2012 bola v Úradnom vestníku Európskej únie (2) uverejnená žiadosť Litovskej republiky o zápis názvu „Kaimiškas Jovarų alus“ do registra.
 (2)
 Vzhľadom na to, že Komisii nebola oznámená žiadna námietka v zmysle článku 51 nariadenia (EÚ) č. 1151/2012, názov „Kaimiškas Jovarų alus“ by sa mal zapísať do registra,
 PRIJALA TOTO NARIADENIE:
 Článok 1
 Názov „Kaimiškas Jovarų alus“ (CHZO) sa zapisuje do registra.
 Názov uvedený v prvom odseku sa vzťahuje na výrobok triedy 2.1. Pivo, ktorá je uvedená v prílohe XI k vykonávaciemu nariadeniu Komisie (EÚ) č. 668/2014 (3).
 Článok 2
 Toto nariadenie nadobúda účinnosť dvadsiatym dňom po jeho uverejnení v Úradnom vestníku Európskej únie.
 Toto nariadenie je záväzné v celom rozsahu a priamo uplatniteľné vo všetkých členských štátoch.
 V Bruseli 25. októbra 2019
 Za Komisiu
 v mene predsedu
 Phil HOGAN
 člen Komisie
 (1) Ú. v. EÚ L 343, 14.12.2012, s. 1.
 (2) Ú. v. EÚ C 217, 28.6.2019, s. 5.
 (3) Vykonávacie nariadenie Komisie (EÚ) č. 668/2014 z 13. júna 2014, ktorým sa stanovujú pravidlá uplatňovania nariadenia Európskeho parlamentu a Rady (EÚ) č. 1151/2012 o systémoch kvality pre poľnohospodárske výrobky a potraviny (Ú. v. EÚ L 179, 19.6.2014, s. 36).