type: legislation

text:
 20.9.2013
 NL
 Publicatieblad van de Europese Unie
 L 250/36
 UITVOERINGSVERORDENING (EU) Nr. 903/2013 VAN DE COMMISSIE
 van 19 september 2013
 inzake de afgifte van invoercertificaten voor de aanvragen die tijdens de eerste zeven dagen van september 2013 in het kader van het bij Verordening (EG) nr. 1385/2007 geopende tariefcontingent zijn ingediend voor vlees van pluimvee
 DE EUROPESE COMMISSIE,
 Gezien het Verdrag betreffende de werking van de Europese Unie,
 Gezien Verordening (EG) nr. 1234/2007 van de Raad van 22 oktober 2007 houdende een gemeenschappelijke ordening van de landbouwmarkten en specifieke bepalingen voor een aantal landbouwproducten („integrale-GMO-verordening”) (1),
 Gezien Verordening (EG) nr. 1301/2006 van de Commissie van 31 augustus 2006 houdende gemeenschappelijke voorschriften voor het beheer van door middel van een stelsel van invoercertificaten beheerde invoertariefcontingenten voor landbouwproducten (2), en met name artikel 7, lid 2,
 Gezien Verordening (EG) nr. 1385/2007 van de Commissie van 26 november 2007 houdende uitvoeringsbepalingen van Verordening (EG) nr. 774/94 van de Raad, wat betreft de opening en vaststelling van de wijze van beheer van communautaire tariefcontingenten voor vlees van pluimvee (3), en met name artikel 5, lid 6,
 Overwegende hetgeen volgt:
 De in de eerste zeven dagen van september 2013 voor de deelperiode van 1 oktober tot en met 31 december 2013 ingediende invoercertificaataanvragen hebben, voor bepaalde contingenten, betrekking op een hoeveelheid die groter is dan de beschikbare hoeveelheid. Bijgevolg dient door vaststelling van de op de aangevraagde hoeveelheden toe te passen toewijzingscoëfficiënt te worden bepaald in hoeverre de invoercertificaten kunnen worden afgegeven,
 HEEFT DE VOLGENDE VERORDENING VASTGESTELD:
 Artikel 1
 Op de invoercertificaataanvragen die op grond van Verordening (EG) nr. 1385/2007 zijn ingediend voor de deelperiode van 1 oktober tot en met 31 december 2013, worden de in de bijlage bij de onderhavige verordening vastgestelde toewijzingscoëfficiënten toegepast.
 Artikel 2
 Deze verordening treedt in werking op 20 september 2013.
 Deze verordening is verbindend in al haar onderdelen en is rechtstreeks toepasselijk in elke lidstaat.
 Gedaan te Brussel, 19 september 2013.
 Voor de Commissie, namens de voorzitter,
 Jerzy PLEWA
 Directeur-generaal Landbouw en Plattelandsontwikkeling
 (1) PB L 299 van 16.11.2007, blz. 1.
 (2) PB L 238 van 1.9.2006, blz. 13.
 (3) PB L 309 van 27.11.2007, blz. 47.
 BIJLAGE
 Nummer van de groep
 Volgnummer
 Toewijzingscoëfficiënt voor de invoercertificaataanvragen die zijn ingediend voor de deelperiode van 1.10.2013-31.12.2013
 (%)
 1
 09.4410
 0,26388
 2
 09.4411
 0,263325
 3
 09.4412
 0,335355
 4
 09.4420
 0,314957
 6
 09.4422
 0,323939


jurisdiction: EU

text:
 |
 52015PC0038
 Prijedlog UREDBE VIJEĆA o suspenziji carina koje se primjenjuju na uvoz određenih teških ulja i drugih sličnih proizvoda /* COM/2015/038 final - 2015/0024 (NLE) */
 OBRAZLOŽENJE
 1. KONTEKST PRIJEDLOGA
 Svrha ovog prijedloga Uredbe Vijeća jest
 suspenzija autonomnih carina zajedničke carinske tarife na određenu
 robu navedenu u poglavlju 27. (teška ulja), trenutačno razvrstanu u oznaku
 KN 2707 99 99.
 U skladu s napomenom 2. u poglavlju 27. ulja u
 kojima je masa nearomatskih sastojaka veća od mase aromatskih sastojaka
 razvrstana su u tarifni broj 2710, te se stoga proizvodi izuzimaju od
 plaćanja carine ako su za podvrgavanje specifičnim procesima. Međutim,
 ulja u kojima je masa aromatskih sastojaka veća od mase nearomatskih
 sastojaka moraju se od travnja 2013. razvrstavati u tarifni broj 2707
 (KN 2707 99 9) i time podliježu stopi carine od 1,7 %.
 Tehničke karakteristike predmetnih
 proizvoda navedene su u napomenama s objašnjenjem kombinirane nomenklature[1] tarifnih podbrojeva
 2707 99 91 i 2707 99 99; te su napomene izmijenjene u travnju 2013. kako bi se
 odredilo područje primjene proizvoda obuhvaćenih tarifnim brojem 2710
 i uklonila proturječnost između napomena s objašnjenjem kombinirane
 nomenklature i napomene 2. u poglavlju 27. Stoga su ta ulja zbog udjela
 aromatskih sastojaka koje sadržavaju razvrstana u različite tarifne
 podbrojeve i u skladu s time se na njih primjenjuje različito tarifno
 postupanje. Zbog toga ta ulja od travnja 2013. podliježu pristojbi od
 1,7 %.
 Međutim, u interesu gospodarskih
 subjekata ta bi ulja, neovisno o udjelu aromatskih sastojaka, ako su
 namijenjena za podvrgavanje „specifičnim procesima” kako je definirano u
 dodatnoj napomeni 5. u poglavlju 27. (destilacija u vakuumu, krekiranje,
 reformiranje itd.) i podliježu postupku za uporabu u posebne svrhe
 utvrđenom u Uredbi Komisije (EEZ) br. 2454/93[2], trebalo potpuno
 izuzeti od plaćanja carine pod uvjetom da je postupak proveden.
 Također se mora napomenuti da je od 1. srpnja 2014. Uredbom Vijeća
 (EU) br. 1387/2013 od 17. prosinca 2013[3]
 za te proizvode odobrena privremena suspenzija autonomnih carina
 zajedničke carinske tarife.
 Stoga se ovim nacrtom predlaže isto tarifno
 postupanje za iste kategorije proizvoda, neovisno o njihovoj razvrstanosti na
 dan objave prethodno navedenih napomena s objašnjenjem kombinirane
 nomenklature, kako bi se svi gospodarski subjekti tretirali jednako i izbjegli
 propusti u bescarinskom tretmanu tih proizvoda koji se na njih primjenjuje od
 1968.
 Priloženi prijedlog smatra se uravnoteženim
 pristupom kojim se uzima u obzir pravni kontekst i interesi različitih
 dionika s obzirom na to da godinama bez prekida osigurava isto tarifno
 postupanje.
 Prijedlog je u skladu s politikama Unije u
 području vanjske trgovine i industrije.
 U tom se svjetlu predlaže da se Uredba
 Vijeća (EEZ) br. 2658/87 na odgovarajući način izmijeni.
 2. REZULTATI SAVJETOVANJA SA
 ZAINTERESIRANIM STRANAMA I OCJENA UTJECAJA
 Savjetovanja s Odsjekom za tarifnu i
 statističku nomenklaturu Odbora za Carinski zakonik Komisije (sektor KN)
 održana su 23. svibnja 2014. te 17. i 18. srpnja 2014.
 Savjetovanje s Odsjekom za tarifnu i
 statističku nomenklaturu Odbora za Carinski zakonik Komisije
 (poljoprivredni/kemijski sektor) održano je od 4. do 6. lipnja 2014.
 Savjetovanja sa Skupinom za gospodarska
 tarifna pitanja održana su od 19. do 21. svibnja 2014., 18. lipnja 2014. te 14.
 i 15. srpnja 2014.
 Dionici su već tražili suspenziju
 autonomnih carina zajedničke carinske tarife za te proizvode koja je odobrena
 Uredbom Vijeća (EU) br. 722/2014. Cilj je ove Uredbe omogućiti
 povrat carina plaćenih između travnja 2013. i lipnja 2014.
 3. PRAVNI ELEMENTI PRIJEDLOGA
 Pravna osnova prijedloga je
 članak 31. Ugovora o funkcioniranju Europske unije.
 Načelo supsidijarnosti ne primjenjuje se
 jer prijedlog potpada pod isključivu nadležnost Unije.
 Prijedlog je u skladu s načelom
 proporcionalnosti s obzirom na to da se njime, kako je predviđeno
 Ugovorom, promiče trgovina između država članica i trećih
 zemalja i uravnotežuju trgovački interesi gospodarskih subjekata bez
 mijenjanja popisa WTO-a za EU.
 Na temelju članka 31. Ugovora o
 funkcioniranju Europske unije, autonomnu carinsku stopu utvrđuje
 Vijeće kvalificiranom većinom na temelju prijedloga Komisije.
 4. UTJECAJ NA PRORAČUN
 Teško je procijeniti gubitak uključenih
 vlastitih sredstava zbog nedostatka detaljnih statističkih podataka o
 uvozu tih proizvoda tijekom razdoblja u kojem nisu bili izuzeti od
 plaćanja carine. Gubitak prihoda u tradicionalnim vlastitim sredstvima procjenjuje
 se na 29,4 milijuna EUR godišnje (na temelju statističkih podataka o uvozu
 za predmetnu oznaku TARIC tijekom srpnja i kolovoza 2014.). U razdoblju od
 15 mjeseci (između 4. travnja 2013. i 31. lipnja 2014.), taj se iznos
 procjenjuje na 36,7 milijuna EUR pri čemu se mora uzeti u obzir da do 4.
 travnja 2013. te od 1. srpnja 2014. nisu plaćane carine.
 2015/0024 (NLE)
 Prijedlog
 UREDBE VIJEĆA
 o suspenziji carina koje se primjenjuju na
 uvoz određenih teških ulja i drugih sličnih proizvoda
 VIJEĆE EUROPSKE UNIJE,
 uzimajući u obzir Ugovor o funkcioniranju
 Europske unije, a posebno njegov članak 31.,
 uzimajući u obzir prijedlog Europske
 komisije,
 budući da:
 (1) U kombiniranoj nomenklaturi
 utvrđenoj u Prilogu I. Uredbi Vijeća (EEZ) br. 2658/87[4], pod tarifnim brojem
 2710, carinske pristojbe autonomno su suspendirane za određena ulja u
 kojima je masa nearomatskih sastojaka veća od mase aromatskih sastojaka,
 ako su ta ulja namijenjena za podvrgavanje specifičnim procesima, pod
 uvjetom da ti proizvodi podliježu postupku za uporabu u posebne svrhe
 utvrđenom u Uredbi Komisije (EEZ) br. 2454/93[5].
 (2) Određena ulja i drugi
 proizvodi u kojima je masa aromatskih sastojaka veća od mase nearomatskih
 sastojaka, bili su također do travnja 2013. razvrstani u tarifni broj 2710
 te se stoga na njih primjenjivao bescarinski tretman na neodređeno
 vrijeme.
 (3) Međutim, od 4. travnja
 2013. ta ulja i drugi proizvodi razvrstani su u tarifni broj 2707 bez
 bescarinskog tretmana. S učinkom od 1. srpnja 2014. Uredbom Vijeća
 (EU) br. 1387/2013[6]
 za te je proizvode odobrena privremena autonomna suspenzija carina.
 (4) Budući da u Uniji nema
 opskrbe takvim uljima i proizvodima u kojima je masa aromatskih sastojaka
 veća od mase nearomatskih sastojaka, to povoljnije tarifno postupanje
 trebalo se bez prekida primjenjivati tako dugo dok su ti proizvodi bili
 namijenjeni za podvrgavanje specifičnim procesima i dok su se poštovali
 postupci za uporabu u posebne svrhe.
 (5) Stoga, kako bi se prikladno
 osigurala povlastica suspenzije carina za te proizvode razvrstane u oznaku KN
 2707 99 99, suspenzija bi se trebala primjenjivati retroaktivno s učinkom
 od 4. travnja 2013. do 30. lipnja 2014.,
 DONIJELO JE OVU UREDBU:
 Članak 1.
 Od 4. travnja 2013. do 30. lipnja 2014. carine
 na robu razvrstanu u oznaku KN 2707 99 99 namijenjenu za uporabu kao
 rafinerijska sirovina koja se podvrgava nekom od specifičnih procesa
 opisanih u dodatnoj napomeni 5. u poglavlju 27. drugog dijela kombinirane
 nomenklature utvrđene u Prilogu I. Uredbi (EEZ) br. 2658/87,
 autonomno se suspendiraju pod uvjetom da se poštuju postupci za uporabu u
 posebne svrhe utvrđeni u člancima 291. do 300. Uredbe (EEZ)
 br. 2454/93.
 Članak 2.
 Ova Uredba stupa na snagu dvadesetog dana
 nakon dana objave u Službenom listu Europske unije.
 Ova je Uredba u cijelosti
 obvezujuća i izravno se primjenjuje u svim državama članicama.
 Sastavljeno u Bruxellesu
 Za
 Vijeće
 Predsjednik
 ZAKONODAVNI FINANCIJSKI IZVJEŠTAJ
 1. OKVIR PRIJEDLOGA/INICIJATIVE
 1.1. Naslov prijedloga/inicijative
 1.2. Vrsta prijedloga/inicijative
 1.3. Ciljevi
 1.4. Osnova prijedloga/inicijative
 1.5. Trajanje i financijski utjecaj
 1.6. Predviđene metode upravljanja
 2. MJERE UPRAVLJANJA
 3. PROCIJENJENI FINANCIJSKI
 UTJECAJ PRIJEDLOGA/INICIJATIVE
 Procijenjeni utjecaj na prihode
 ZAKONODAVNI
 FINANCIJSKI IZVJEŠTAJ
 1. OKVIR PRIJEDLOGA/INICIJATIVE
 1.1. Naslov prijedloga/inicijative
 Uredba
 Vijeća o izmjeni Priloga I. Uredbi Vijeća (EEZ) br. 2658/87
 o tarifnoj i statističkoj nomenklaturi i o Zajedničkoj carinskoj
 tarifi.
 1.2. Vrsta prijedloga/inicijative
 ̈ Prijedlog/inicijativa
 odnosi se na novo djelovanje
 ̈ Prijedlog/inicijativa
 odnosi se na novo djelovanje nakon pilot-projekta / pripremnog djelovanja[7]
 x Prijedlog/inicijativa odnosi se na produženje postojećeg
 djelovanja
 ̈ Prijedlog/inicijativa
 odnosi se na djelovanje koje je preusmjereno na novo djelovanje
 1.3. Ciljevi
 1.3.1. Višegodišnji strateški ciljevi
 Komisije na koje se odnosi prijedlog/inicijativa
 Na
 autonomnoj osnovi osigurati bescarinski tretman za određena ulja u kojima masa
 nearomatskih sastojaka nije veća od mase aromatskih sastojaka i koja su
 namijenjena za podvrgavanje specifičnim procesima.
 1.3.2. Očekivani rezultati i
 utjecaj
 Navesti učinke
 koje bi prijedlog/inicijativa trebali imati na ciljane korisnike/skupine.
 Autonomna suspenzija carina za određene proizvode
 (teška ulja) razvrstane u oznaku KN 2707 99 99 Priloga I. Uredbi Vijeća
 (EEZ) br. 2658/87 od 23. srpnja 1987. o tarifnoj i statističkoj
 nomenklaturi i o Zajedničkoj carinskoj tarifi kako se primjenjivala do 4.
 travnja 2013.
 1.4. Osnova prijedloga/inicijative
 1.4.1. Zahtjevi koje je potrebno
 kratkoročno ili dugoročno ispuniti
 Suspenzija
 carina za ulja neovisno o udjelu aromatskih sastojaka pod uvjetom da su ti
 proizvodi bili namijenjeni za podvrgavanje specifičnim procesima i da su
 se poštovali postupci za uporabu u posebne svrhe.
 1.4.2. Dodana vrijednost sudjelovanja
 EU-a
 Pravna
 osnova prijedloga je članak 31. Ugovora o funkcioniranju Europske
 unije.
 Načelo
 supsidijarnosti ne primjenjuje se jer prijedlog potpada pod isključivu
 nadležnost Unije.
 1.4.3. Pouke iz prijašnjih
 sličnih iskustava
 Razvrstavanje
 teških ulja prema masi aromatskih sastojaka ne bi trebalo utjecati na tarifno
 postupanje.
 1.5. Trajanje i financijski
 utjecaj
 ̈ Prijedlog/inicijativa ograničenog
 trajanja
 –
 X Prijedlog/inicijativa na snazi od 4. travnja
 2013. do 30. lipnja 2014.
 –
 ̈ Financijski utjecaj od GGGG do GGGG
 ̈ Prijedlog/inicijativa
 neograničenog trajanja
 –
 Provedba s razdobljem uspostave od 2013.
 –
 nakon čega slijedi redovna provedba.
 1.6. Predviđene metode
 upravljanja[8]
 ̈ Izravno upravljanje Komisije
 –
 ̈ koje obavljaju njezini odjeli, uključujući njezino osoblje u
 delegacijama Unije;
 –
 ̈ koje obavljaju izvršne agencije
 ̈ Podijeljeno upravljanje s državama članicama
 ̈ Neizravno upravljanje delegiranjem zadaća provedbe:
 –
 ̈ trećim zemljama ili tijelima koja su one odredile;
 –
 ̈ međunarodnim organizacijama i njihovim agencijama (navesti);
 –
 ̈ EIB-u i Europskom investicijskom fondu;
 –
 ̈ tijelima na koja se upućuje u člancima 208. i 209.
 Financijske uredbe;
 –
 ̈ tijelima javnog prava;
 –
 ̈ tijelima uređenima privatnim pravom koja pružaju javne usluge u
 mjeri u kojoj daju odgovarajuća financijska jamstva;
 –
 ̈ tijelima uređenima privatnim pravom države članice kojima je
 povjerena provedba javno-privatnog partnerstva i koja daju odgovarajuća
 financijska jamstva;
 –
 ̈ osobama kojima je povjerena provedba posebnih aktivnosti u ZVSP-u u
 skladu s glavom V. UEU-a i koje su navedene u odgovarajućem temeljnom
 aktu.
 – Ako je označeno više načina
 upravljanja, pojedinosti navesti u odjeljku „Napomene”.
 Napomene
 Carinska
 tijela država članica primjenom odredbi Carinskog zakonika (postupak
 „uporabe u posebne svrhe”).
 2. MJERE UPRAVLJANJA
 Mjere
 koje podliježu carinskom nadzoru („uporaba u posebne svrhe”)
 (čl. 291. do 300. Uredbe Komisije (EEZ) br. 2454/93 (SL
 L 253, 11.10.1993.)).
 3. PROCIJENJENI FINANCIJSKI
 UTJECAJ PRIJEDLOGA/INICIJATIVE
 3.1. Procijenjeni utjecaj na
 prihode
 –
 ̈ Prijedlog/inicijativa nema financijski utjecaj na prihode.
 –
 x Prijedlog/inicijativa ima sljedeći financijski
 utjecaj:
 –
 x na vlastita sredstva
 –
 ̈ na razne prihode
 u
 milijunima EUR (do 3 decimalna mjesta)
 Proračunska linija u okviru prihoda: || Odobrena sredstva dostupna za tekuću proračunsku godinu || Utjecaj prijedloga/inicijative[9]
 Godina N
 Članak 120. || || 29,396 milijuna EUR
 Navesti metodu
 izračuna utjecaja na prihode.
 Izračun
 gubitka prihoda u tradicionalnim vlastitim sredstvima temelji se na vrijednosti
 uvoza u EU proizvoda u oznaci TARIC 2707 99 99 10 tijekom
 razdoblja od 2 mjeseca od 1. srpnja 2014.
 Potrebno
 je naglasiti da za proizvode koji su predmet ovog nacrta nisu naplaćivane
 carine do objave Napomene s objašnjenjem kombinirane nomenklature (SL C96/23 od
 4.4.2013.).
 Kao
 što je rečeno, suspenzija carina na snazi je od 1. srpnja 2014. Uvoz robe
 iz predmetne oznake TARIC iznosi 192 128 522, 445 EUR u jednom
 mjesecu ne uzimajući u obzir carinske povlastice.
 Stoga
 bi se procijenjeni ukupni gubitak prihoda u tradicionalnim vlastitim sredstvima
 na godišnjoj razini trebao izračunavati kako slijedi:
 192 128 522,
 445 EUR × 12 = 2 305 542 269,46 EUR;
 2 305 542 269,46
 EUR × 1,7 % = 39 194 248,58082 EUR;
 39 194 248,58082
 EUR × 75 % = 29 395 663,935615 EUR;
 [1] Napomene
 s objašnjenjem kombinirane nomenklature (SL C 96, 4.4.2013.,
 str. 23.).
 [2] Uredba
 Komisije (EEZ) br. 2454/93 od 2. srpnja 1993. o utvrđivanju odredaba
 za provedbu Uredbe Vijeća (EEZ) br. 2913/92 o
 Carinskom zakoniku Zajednice (SL
 L 253, 11.10.1993., str. 1.).
 [3] Uredba
 Vijeća (EU) br. 1387/2013 od 17. prosinca 2013. o suspenziji
 autonomnih carina zajedničke carinske tarife za određene
 poljoprivredne i industrijske proizvode (SL L 354, 28.12.2013.,
 str. 201.).
 [4] Uredba
 Vijeća (EEZ) br. 2658/87 od 23. srpnja 1987. o tarifnoj i
 statističkoj nomenklaturi i o Zajedničkoj carinskoj tarifi (SL
 L 256, 7.9.1987., str. 1.).
 [5] Uredba
 Komisije (EEZ) br. 2454/93 od 2. srpnja 1993. o utvrđivanju odredaba
 za provedbu Uredbe Vijeća (EEZ) br. 2913/92 o
 Carinskom zakoniku Zajednice (SL
 L 253, 11.10.1993., str. 1.).
 [6] Uredba
 Vijeća (EU) br. 1387/2013 od 17. prosinca 2013. o suspenziji
 autonomnih carina zajedničke carinske tarife za određene
 poljoprivredne i industrijske proizvode (SL L 354, 28.12.2013.,
 str. 201.).
 [7] Kako
 je navedeno u članku 54. stavku 2. točkama (a)
 ili (b) Financijske uredbe.
 [8] Informacije
 o načinima upravljanja i upućivanju na Financijsku uredbu dostupne su
 na internetskim stranicama BudgWeb: http://www.cc.cec/budg/man/budgmanag/budgmanag_en.html
 [9] Kad
 je riječ o tradicionalnim vlastitim sredstvima (carine, pristojbe na
 šećer) navedeni iznosi moraju biti neto iznosi, to jest bruto iznosi
 umanjeni za 25 % na ime troškova naplate.


jurisdiction: US

text:
 II
 Calendar No. 450
 112th CONGRESS
 2d Session
 S. 1744
 IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
 October 20, 2011
 Ms. Klobuchar (for
 herself, Mr. Nelson of Florida,
 Mr. Cornyn, and Mr. Coons) introduced the following bill; which was
 read twice and referred to the
 Committee on the
 Judiciary
 July 12, 2012
 Reported by Mr. Leahy,
 with an amendment and an amendment to the title
 Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert
 the part printed in italic
 A BILL
 To provide funding for State courts to assess and improve
 the handling of proceedings relating to adult guardianship and conservatorship,
 to authorize the Attorney General to carry out a pilot program for the conduct
 of background checks on individuals to be appointed as guardians or
 conservators, and to promote the widespread adoption of information technology
 to better monitor, report, and audit conservatorships of protected
 persons.
 1.Short titleThis Act may be cited as the
 Guardian Accountability and Senior
 Protection Act.
 IState court
 improvement
 101.Funding for
 State courts to assess and improve handling of proceedings relating to adult
 guardianship and conservatorshipPart A of title IV of the Older Americans
 Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 3032 et seq.) is amended—
 (1)in section
 411(a)—
 (A)in the matter
 preceding paragraph (1), by inserting (including the highest court of
 each State) after with States;
 (B)in paragraph (12),
 by striking ; and and inserting a semicolon;
 (C)by redesignating
 paragraph (13) as paragraph (14); and
 (D)by inserting after
 paragraph (12) the following:
 (13)assessing the
 fairness, effectiveness, timeliness, and accessibility of adult guardianship
 and conservatorship proceedings, implementing changes deemed necessary as a
 result of the assessments, and collecting necessary data regarding those
 proceedings and the impact of the necessary changes;
 and
 ;
 and
 (2)by inserting at
 the end the following:
 423.Funding for
 State courts to assess and improve handling of proceedings relating to adult
 guardianship and conservatorship
 (a)In
 generalThe Assistant Secretary, in consultation with the
 Attorney General, shall make grants, in accordance with this section, to the
 highest court of a State for the purpose of enabling such a court, in
 collaboration with the State unit on aging—
 (1)to conduct
 assessments, in accordance with such requirements as the Secretary shall
 publish, of the role, responsibilities, and effectiveness of State courts in
 carrying out State laws requiring proceedings (conducted by or under the
 supervision of the courts)—
 (A)that determine
 whether to impose a full, limited, or temporary adult guardianship or
 conservatorship;
 (B)that select a
 guardian of a person or conservator of an estate;
 (C)that review the
 continued need for a full, limited, or temporary guardianship or
 conservatorship of an adult; and
 (D)that review the
 performance of a person appointed as guardian or conservator for an
 adult;
 (2)to implement
 changes deemed necessary as a result of the assessments; and
 (3)to collect data
 regarding those proceedings and the impact of the necessary changes.
 (b)ApplicationsIn
 order to be eligible for a grant under this section, a highest State court
 shall submit to the Assistant Secretary an application at such time, in such
 form, and including such information and assurances as the Assistant Secretary
 shall require.
 (c)AllotmentsEach
 highest State court which has an application approved under subsection (b), and
 is conducting assessment activities in accordance with this section, may
 receive a grant from the Assistant Secretary, for each of fiscal years 2012
 through 2015, from amounts appropriated to carry out section 411, in an amount
 to be determined appropriate by the Assistant Secretary.
 (d)Use of grant
 fundsEach highest State court which receives funds under this
 section may use such funds to pay—
 (1)any or all costs
 of activities under this section in fiscal year 2012; and
 (2)not more than 75
 percent of the cost of activities under this section in each of fiscal years
 2013, 2014, and
 2015.
 .
 IIBackground
 checks
 201.DefinitionsIn this title:
 (1)Adverse
 informationThe term adverse information
 means—
 (A)information from a
 criminal history background check that indicates that the individual has been
 convicted of a relevant crime;
 (B)information that
 the individual has been judicially determined to have committed abuse,
 abandonment, neglect, or financial or sexual exploitation of a child, spouse,
 or other adult; and
 (C)information from
 an adult or child abuse registry that indicates that the individual is included
 in an adult or child abuse registry.
 (2)ConservatorThe
 term conservator means an individual who is appointed by a court
 under applicable State law to manage the estate of a protected person. Such
 definition shall not apply to—
 (A)a bank with trust
 powers, bank and trust company, or trust company organized under the laws of
 any State or of the United States and which is regulated by the commissioner of
 commerce or a Federal regulator; or
 (B)a credit union,
 savings and loan, or other financial institution.
 (3)GuardianThe
 term guardian means an individual who is appointed by a court to
 protect an incapacitated individual’s personal or financial welfare.
 (4)Protected
 personThe term protected person means an adult whom
 the court determines in a guardian or conservatorship proceeding is unable to
 manage property and accounts.
 (5)Relevant
 crimeThe term Relevant crime includes any felony or
 misdemeanor conviction for abuse, neglect, fraud, misappropriation,
 misrepresentation, theft, conversion, or other financial crime, or such other
 types of offenses as a participating highest court of a State may specify for
 purposes of conducting the pilot program in such State.
 202.Pilot program
 for national and State background checks of guardians and conservators
 (a)Authority To
 conduct programThe Attorney General, shall establish a pilot
 program to identify efficient, effective, and economical procedures for State
 courts to conduct background checks on prospective guardians and
 conservators.
 (b)Requirements
 (1)Requirement to
 conduct background checksUnder the pilot program under
 subsection (a), a State court, prior to appointing a prospective guardian or
 conservator on or after the commencement date of the State pilot program, shall
 conduct a background check on the guardian or conservator in accordance with
 such procedures as the participating State shall establish pursuant to
 paragraph (2).
 (2)ProceduresThe
 procedures established by a participating highest State court under paragraph
 (1) shall be designed to—
 (A)provide a
 prospective guardian or conservator with notice that the appointing court is
 required to perform background checks with respect to prospective guardians or
 conservators;
 (B)require, as a
 condition of appointment, that the prospective guardian or conservator—
 (i)provide a
 statement signed by the prospective guardian or conservator authorizing the
 appointing court to request national and State criminal history background
 checks;
 (ii)provide the
 appointing court with a set of the prospective guardian's or conservator’s
 fingerprints; and
 (iii)provide
 information as to whether the individual has been suspended or disbarred from
 law, accounting, or other professional licensing for misconduct involving
 financial matters that affect the ability of the individual to provide the
 services of a guardian or conservator safely and competently;
 (C)permit the courts
 to check any available State and national registries that would be likely to
 contain adverse information concerning a prospective guardian or conservator;
 and
 (D)permit the courts
 hearing guardian or conservatorship matters to obtain State and national
 criminal history background checks on the prospective guardian or
 conservator.
 (3)Consideration of
 informationPrior to appointing an individual with respect to
 whom adverse information is available as a guardian or conservator under a
 program under this title, the appointing court shall consider the nature of the
 information or offense involved, the date of any offense, and evidence of the
 proposed guardian's or conservator’s rehabilitation and determine whether the
 individual’s appointment is in the best interest of the protected
 person.
 (4)Use of
 information; immunity from liabilityA participating highest
 State court shall ensure that information obtained about the prospective
 guardian or conservator pursuant to a background check conducted under the
 State supreme court pilot program is used only for the purpose of determining
 the suitability of the prospective guardian or conservator for
 appointment.
 (c)Participating
 States
 (1)In
 generalThe Attorney General shall enter into agreements with not
 more than 5 States to conduct the pilot program under this section in such
 States.
 (2)RequirementsAn
 agreement entered into under paragraph (1) shall require that a participating
 highest State court—
 (A)be responsible for
 monitoring compliance with the requirements of the pilot program;
 (B)have procedures by
 which a prospective guardian or conservator may appeal or dispute the accuracy
 of the information obtained in a background check, including consideration of
 the nature of the information or offense involved, the date of offense, and the
 evidence of the prospective guardian's or conservator’s rehabilitation;
 (C)establish
 procedures requiring the courts hearing guardian or conservatorship matters to
 request criminal history background checks of prospective guardians or
 conservators and review the results of any State or national criminal history
 background check regarding a prospective guardian or conservator to determine
 whether the prospective guardian or conservator has any conviction for a
 relevant crime;
 (D)keep data on the
 background checks performed to be readily accessible for the evaluation;
 and
 (E)agree to obtain
 from the State, non-Federal contributions, in cash or in-kind, toward the costs
 of carrying out the pilot program in an amount equal to not less than $1 for
 each $4 of Federal funds provided to the court under this section.
 (3)Application and
 selection criteria
 (A)ApplicationThe
 highest State court seeking to participate in the pilot program established
 under this section, shall submit an application to the Attorney General
 containing such information and at such time as the Attorney General may
 specify.
 (B)Selection
 criteria
 (i)In
 generalIn selecting highest State court to participate in the
 pilot program under this section, the Attorney General shall establish criteria
 to ensure—
 (I)geographic
 diversity;
 (II)the consideration
 of a variety of payment mechanisms for covering the costs of conducting the
 background checks required under the pilot program; and
 (III)that at least
 one participating highest State court includes protected person abuse
 prevention training for prospective guardians or conservators as part of the
 pilot program conducted in that State.
 (ii)Inclusion of
 States with existing programsNothing in this section shall be
 construed as prohibiting any State which, as of the date of the enactment of
 this Act, has procedures for conducting background checks with respect to the
 appointment of guardians or conservators from being selected to participate in
 the pilot program conducted under this section.
 (d)PaymentsOf
 the amounts made available under subsection (f) to conduct the pilot program
 under this section, the Attorney General shall—
 (1)make payments to
 participating highest State courts for the costs of conducting the pilot
 program in such States which may include the administration of the pilot
 program, staffing, the cost of background checks, and other purposes as
 determined by the Attorney General; and
 (2)reserve up to 4
 percent of such amounts to conduct the evaluation required under subsection
 (e).
 (e)EvaluationThe
 Attorney General shall, through grant, contract, or interagency agreement,
 conduct an evaluation of the pilot program conducted under this section. Such
 evaluation should—
 (1)review the various
 procedures implemented by participating highest State courts for the conduct of
 background checks of prospective guardians or conservators and identify the
 most efficient, effective, and economical procedures for conducting such
 background checks;
 (2)assess the costs
 of conducting such background checks (including start-up and administrative
 costs);
 (3)consider the
 benefits and disadvantages associated with requiring prospective guardians or
 conservators to pay the costs of conducting such background checks;
 (4)determine the
 extent to which conducting such background checks leads to any unintended
 consequences, including a reduction in the available guardians or conservators
 or delay and backlogs in processing appointments;
 (5)to the extent
 feasible, seek to determine the efficacy of the pilot program in reducing abuse
 of protected persons and their estate by guardians or conservators; and
 (6)include other
 elements that would bear on the usefulness and effectiveness of the
 program.
 (f)FundingThere
 are authorized to be appropriated to the Attorney General to carry out the
 pilot program under this section, such sums as may be necessary for the period
 of fiscal years 2012 through 2015.
 IIIE-File
 301.DefinitionsIn this title:
 (1)AdultThe
 term adult means an individual who is 18 years of age or
 older.
 (2)ConservatorThe
 term conservator means an individual who is appointed by a court
 under applicable State law to manage the estate of a protected person.
 (3)ExploitationThe
 term exploitation means the fraudulent or otherwise illegal,
 unauthorized, or improper act or process of a conservator that uses the
 resources of a protected person for the conservator's monetary or personal
 benefit, profit, or gain, or that results in depriving a protected person of
 rightful access to, or use of, benefits, resources, belongings, services or
 assets.
 (4)GuardianThe
 term guardian means an individual who is appointed by a court to
 protect an incapacitated individual’s personal or financial welfare.
 (5)Highest State
 courtThe term highest State court means the highest
 appellate court within a State.
 (6)Protected
 personThe term protected person means an adult whom
 the court determines in a guardian or conservatorship proceeding is unable to
 manage property and accounts.
 302.Conservator
 monitoring grant program
 (a)Grants
 (1)In
 generalThe State Justice Institute, pursuant to the authority
 provided in the State Justice Institute Act of 1984 (42 U.S.C. 10701 et seq.),
 may award grants to eligible highest State courts to assist in improving
 conservator monitoring efforts through electronic filing.
 (2)DurationGrants
 awarded under paragraph (1) shall be for a period of not to exceed 3
 years.
 (b)Use of
 funds
 (1)In
 generalAmounts received under a grant awarded under subsection
 (a) shall be used to implement and evaluate the impact of systems enabling the
 annual accountings and other required conservatorship filings to be completed,
 filed, reviewed, and analyzed electronically in order to simplify the filing
 process for conservators and better enable the courts to identify discrepancies
 and detect fraud and exploitation of protected persons.
 (2)AllocationA
 highest State court that receives a grant under this section shall prioritize
 the use of the grant funds so as to assist the greatest number of conservators
 and protect the greatest number of protected persons.
 (c)ApplicationA
 highest State court desiring a grant under subsection (a)(1) shall submit an
 application to the State Justice Institute at such time, in such manner, and
 accompanied by such information as the State Justice Institute may
 require.
 303.Authorization of
 appropriationsThere are
 authorized to be appropriated to the State Justice Institute to carry out the
 activities under this title, such sums as may be necessary for the period of
 fiscal years 2012 through 2015.
 1.Short titleThis Act may be cited as the
 Guardian Accountability and Senior
 Protection Act.
 2.Assessment and
 improvement of rules and procedures relating to adult guardianships and
 conservatorshipsSection 411
 of the Older Americans Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 3032) is amended—
 (1)in subsection (a)—
 (A)in the matter preceding
 paragraph (1), by inserting (including the highest court of each
 State) after with States;
 (B)in paragraph (12), by
 striking ; and and inserting a semicolon;
 (C)by redesignating
 paragraph (13) as paragraph (14); and
 (D)by inserting after
 paragraph (12) the following:
 (13)in accordance with
 subsection (c), assessing the fairness, effectiveness, timeliness, safety,
 integrity, and accessibility of adult guardianship and conservatorship
 proceedings, including the appointment and the monitoring of the performance of
 guardians and conservators, and implementing changes deemed necessary as a
 result of the assessments; and
 ;
 and
 (2)by inserting at the end
 the following:
 (c)Adult guardianships and
 conservatorships
 (1)Grants
 (A)In
 generalIn awarding grants or contracts under subsection (a)(13),
 the Assistant Secretary shall obtain feedback from the State Justice Institute
 in accordance with subparagraph (B) and may consult with the Attorney General,
 and such grants or contracts shall otherwise comply with this
 subsection.
 (B)State Justice
 InstituteThe Assistant Secretary shall submit to the State
 Justice Institute recommendations for the awarding of grants or contracts under
 subsection (a)(13). The Institute shall have 60 days in which to submit to the
 Assistant Secretary the response of the Institute to such recommendations. The
 Assistant Secretary shall consider such response prior to awarding such grants
 or contracts.
 (2)Grantees and
 activitiesGrants may be awarded under subsection (a)(13) to the
 highest court of each State for the purpose of enabling such court, in
 collaboration with the State unit on aging and State adult protective service
 agency—
 (A)to conduct assessments of
 the practices and procedures used to—
 (i)determine whether to
 impose a full, limited, or temporary adult guardianship or
 conservatorship;
 (ii)select a guardian of a
 person or conservator of an estate;
 (iii)review the continued
 need for a full, limited, or temporary guardianship or conservatorship of an
 adult; and
 (iv)review the performance
 of guardians or conservators;
 (B)to implement changes
 deemed necessary as a result of the assessments; and
 (C)to collect data regarding
 those practices and procedures and the impact of the necessary changes.
 (3)AllotmentsThe
 amount of a grant under subsection (a)(13) shall be determined by the Assistant
 Secretary, in consultation with the State Justice Institute and the Attorney
 General (if the Assistance Secretary determines appropriate).
 (4)Background
 checksThe Assistant
 Secretary shall set aside 25 percent of amounts made available for grants under
 this subsection in each fiscal year to enable courts to implement or improve
 systems to conduct background checks on prospective guardians and conservators.
 Such systems shall comply with the following requirements:
 (A)At minimum, the
 background checks shall include national and State criminal background checks,
 a search of child abuse and adult abuse registries, and a search as to whether
 the individual has been suspended or disbarred from law, accounting, or other
 professional licensing for misconduct.
 (B)The court shall consider
 all of the information obtained from the background check to determine whether
 such an individual is sufficiently trustworthy to be a guardian or conservator
 and that the appointment of such individual is in the best interest of the
 protected person.
 (C)The information obtained
 from the background check shall only be used for the purpose of determining the
 suitability of the prospective guardian or conservator for appointment.
 (5)Electronic
 filingFunds received
 pursuant to subsection (a)(13) may be used to implement systems enabling the
 annual accountings and other required conservatorship and guardianship filings
 to be completed, filed, and reviewed electronically in order to simplify the
 filing process for conservators and guardians, and better enable the courts to
 identify discrepancies and detect fraud and the exploitation of protected
 persons.
 (6)Evaluation and reportThe Assistant Secretary, in consultation
 with the Attorney General and the State Justice Institute, shall conduct an
 evaluation of the improvements made by courts to which this subsection applies,
 and prepare and submit a report concerning such evaluation to Congress within
 18 months of the date on which the first grant is awarded under subsection
 (a)(13), and a second report 18 months later, and shall use and distribute the
 reports and evaluations as the Assistant Secretary, in consultation with the
 Attorney General and the State Justice Institute, determines appropriate in
 order to improve guardianships and conservatorships
 nationwide.
 .
 Amend the title so as to read:
 A bill to enable State courts to assess and improve the rules and
 procedures relating to adult guardianships and
 conservatorships..
 July 12, 2012
 Reported with an amendment and an amendment to the
 title


type: contracts

text:
29.12.2004 DA Den Europæiske Unions Tidende L 388/3
 AFTALE I FORM AF BREVVEKSLING
 mellem De Europæiske Fællesskaber og deres medlemsstater på den ene side og Den Tidligere
 Jugoslaviske Republik Makedonien på den anden side for at tage hensyn til Den Tjekkiske Republiks,
 Republikken Estlands, Republikken Cyperns, Republikken Letlands, Republikken Litauens,
 Republikken Ungarns, Republikken Maltas, Republikken Polens, Republikken Sloveniens og Den
 Slovakiske Republiks tiltrædelse af Den Europæiske Union
 COUNCIL
 OF THE EUROPEAN UNION
 Brussels, 7 December 2004
 H.E. Mr Sasko STEFKOV,
 Ambassador,
 Head of the Mission of the former Yugoslav
 Republic of Macedonia to the European Communities.
 Sir,
 I have the honour to propose that, if it is acceptable to your Government, this letter and your confirmation shall together
 take the place of signature of the Protocol to the Stabilisation and Association Agreement between the European Commu-
 nities and their Member States, of the one part, and the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, of the other part, to take
 account of the accession of the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the
 Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia and
 the Slovak Republic to the European Union.
 The text of the aforementioned Protocol, herewith annexed, has been approved for signature and provisional application by
 a decision of the Council of the European Union on 22 November 2004. In accordance with its Article 16.3, it shall apply
 provisionally with effect from 1 May 2004.
 Please accept, Sir, the assurance of my highest consideration.
 For the European Community and its Member States
 ---pagebreak--- L 388/4 DA Den Europæiske Unions Tidende 29.12.2004
 MISSION OF THE REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA TO THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES
 Brussels, 7 December 2004
 Dear Sir,
 On behalf of the Government of the Republic of Macedonia I have the honour to acknowledge receipt of your letter
 SGS4/14231 of today’s date regarding the signature of the Protocol to the Stabilisation and Association Agreement between
 the Republic of Macedonia, of the one part, and the European Communities and their Member States, of the other part, to
 take account of the accession of the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia,
 the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia
 and the Slovak Republic to the European Union.
 I confirm the acceptance by the Government of the Republic of Macedonia of the annexed text of the Protocol and consider
 your letter and this letter in reply as equivalent of its signature.
 However, I declare that the Republic of Macedonia does not accept the denomination used for my country in abovemen-
 tioned Protocol, having in view that the constitutional name of my country is the Republic of Macedonia.
 Please accept, Sir, the assurance of my highest consideration,
 For the Republic of Macedonia
 Ambassador
 Saško STEFKOV
 ---pagebreak--- 29.12.2004 DA Den Europæiske Unions Tidende L 388/5
 COUNCIL
 OF THE EUROPEAN UNION
 Brussels, 7 December 2004
 H.E. Mr Sasko STEFKOV,
 Ambassador,
 Head of the Mission of the former Yugoslav
 Republic of Macedonia to the European Communities.
 Sir,
 I have the honour to acknowledge receipt of your letter of today’s date.
 The European Community and its Member States notes that the Exchange of Letters between the European Community and
 its Member States and the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, which takes the place of signature of the Protocol to the
 Stabilisation and Association Agreement between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and
 the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, of the other part, to take account of the accession of the Czech Republic, the
 Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Hungary, the
 Republic of Malta, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia and the Slovak Republic to the European Union, has
 been accomplished and that this cannot be interpreted as acceptance or recognition by the European Community and its
 Member States in whatever form or content of a denomination other than the «former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia».
 Please accept, Sir, the assurance of my highest consideration.
 For the European Community and its Member States


type: caselaw

text:
 24.4.2017
 FI
 Euroopan unionin virallinen lehti
 C 129/5
 Ennakkoratkaisupyyntö, jonka Supremo Tribunal de Justiça (Portugali) on esittänyt 9.2.2017 – David Vicente Fernandes v. Gabinete Português de Carta Verde
 (Asia C-71/17)
 (2017/C 129/07)
 Oikeudenkäyntikieli: portugali
 Ennakkoratkaisua pyytänyt tuomioistuin
 Supremo Tribunal de Justiça
 Pääasian asianosaiset
 Valittaja: David Vicente Fernandes
 Vastapuoli: Gabinete Português de Carta Verde
 Ennakkoratkaisukysymykset
 a)
 Onko Luxemburgissa tehdyllä vakuutussopimuksella Portugalissa vastaavat oikeusvaikutukset kuin Portugalissa tehdyllä vakuutussopimuksella?
 b)
 Onko Gabinete Português de Carta Verde direktiivin 2009/103/EY (1) 24 artiklan 1 kohdassa tarkoitettu korvauselin ja [– –] vastaako se korvausten suorittamisesta vahingon kärsineille direktiivin 20 artiklan 1 kohdassa tarkoitetun kaltaisissa tapauksissa samoin kuin luxemburgilainen vakuutusyhtiö vastaisi?
 c)
 Riittääkö nyt käsiteltävässä asiassa vaatimuksen esittäminen korvauselimelle vai [– –] onko se tarpeen esittää myös vakuutusyhtiölle, ja jos vaatimus on esitettävä vakuutusyhtiölle, [– –] voidaanko se kohdistaa Luxemburgissa sijaitsevalle pääkonttorille vai [– –] onko se kohdistettava Portugalissa toimivalle edustajalle?
 d)
 Jos vakuutusyhtiöllä ei ole edustajaa Portugalissa, kenelle vaatimus on esitettävä täysimääräisen vahingonkorvauksen saamiseksi, jos siviilioikeudellisen vastuun varalta on tehty vakuutussopimus ilman vastuunrajoitusta?
 (1) Moottoriajoneuvojen käyttöön liittyvän vastuun varalta otettavasta vakuutuksesta ja vakuuttamisvelvollisuuden voimaansaattamisesta 16.9.2009 annettu Euroopan parlamentin ja neuvoston direktiivi 2009/103/EY (EUVL 2009, L 263, s. 11).


type: other

text:
Todas as obrigações do dia 25/11 - 13 obrigações encontradas
 EFD - Escrituração Fiscal Digital Entrega do arquivo digital relativo à EFD - Escrituração Fiscal Digital (SPED Fiscal) do ICMS e do IPI, até o dia 25 do mês subsequente ao período a que se refere. Art. 12 da Instrução Normativa n 19/2009. Outubro de 2017
 Entrega do arquivo digital relativo à EFD - Escrituração Fiscal Digital (SPED Fiscal), contendo a totalidade das informações necessárias à apuração do ICMS e do IPI, bem como de outras informações de interesse do Fisco, referente ao mês anterior. Até o dia 25 do mês subsequente ao da apuração. Artigo 121-L do RICMS/AC. Outubro de 2017
 Entrega, pelos contribuintes do ICMS usuários de sistema eletrônico de processamento de dados, de arquivo magnético com registro fiscal dos documentos emitidos por qualquer meio, referente à totalidade das operações de entradas e de saídas e das aquisições e prestações realizadas, tratando-se de contribuintes com inscrição estadual de algarismo final 7 ou 8. Até o dia 25 do mês subsequente. Artigo 259, § 12, inciso III, do RICMS/BA. Outubro de 2017
 Entrega do arquivo digital relativo à EFD - Escrituração Fiscal Digital (SPED Fiscal), contendo a totalidade das informações necessárias à apuração do ICMS e do IPI, bem como de outras informações de interesse do Fisco, referente ao mês anterior. Até o dia 25 do mês subsequente ao da apuração. Artigo 250, § 2o, do RICMS/BA. Outubro de 2017
 Entrega do arquivo digital relativo à Escrituração Fiscal Digital (SPED Fiscal), contendo a totalidade das informações necessárias à apuração do ICMS e do IPI, bem como de outras informações de interesse do Fisco, referente ao mês anterior. Até o dia 25 do mês subsequente. Artigo 54 da Parte 1 do Anexo VII do RICMS/MG. Outubro de 2017
 Entrega da GIA-ICMS, pela CONAB/PGPM, até o dia 25 do mês subsequente. IN DRP no 45/98, Título I, Capitulo XIII, Subitem 4.2. Outubro de 2017
 Entrega, pelos contribuintes do ICMS usuários de sistema eletrônico de processamento de dados (exceto aqueles com atividade de comércio varejista de combustíveis), de arquivo magnético com registro fiscal dos documentos emitidos por qualquer meio, referente à totalidade das operações de entradas e de saídas e das aquisições e prestações realizadas. Até o dia 25 do mês subsequente. Artigo 7o, inciso I, alínea "b", do Anexo 7 do RICMS/SC. Outubro de 2017
 Entrega da GIA-ST, o estabelecimento que efetuar a retenção do imposto remeterá à Gerência Fiscal, até o dia 25 do mês subsequente ao da operação, a Guia Nacional de Informação e Apuração do ICMS Substituição Tributária - GIA-ST, em conformidade com a cláusula oitava do Ajuste SINIEF 04/1993. Base legal: art. 209, § 7°, do RICMS/ES. Novembro de 2017
 Para os contribuintes enquadrados no código 3514-0/00 - distribuição de energia elétrica, da CNAE, o recolhimento do imposto relativo aos fatos geradores ocorridos entre os dias 1° a 20 de cada mês, deverá ocorrer até o seu dia 25, observado o disposto no Decreto n. 666/2015, podendo, em substituição a essa regra, optar pelo pagamento de percentual equivalente a 70% (setenta por cento) do saldo devedor declarado na EFD - Escrituração Fiscal Digital correspondente ao mês imediatamente anterior, sendo recolhida, eventual diferença em relação ao valor efetivamente apurado para as EFD correspondentes, nos prazos de que trata o inciso XIX do art. 74, que seria até o dia 12 do mês subsequente. Base legal: artigo 75, inciso II do RICMS/PR. Novembro de 2017
 Os contribuintes do ICMS optantes pelo Regime Especial Unificado de Arrecadação de Tributos e Contribuições devidos pelas Microempresas e Empresas de Pequeno Porte - Simples Nacional, instituído pela Lei Complementar no 123, de 14 de dezembro de 2006, deverão apresentar a de que trata o art. 514-A do RICMS, aprovado pelo Decreto no 4.676, de 18 de junho de 2001, sempre que realizarem operações de aquisição de mercadorias em operações interestaduais. A Declaração de Entradas Interestaduais - DEI será apresentada até o dia 25 do mês seguinte ao do ingresso das mercadorias no território paraense. (Artigos 6o e 7o § 2o da IN SEFA no 19 de 29/07/2009). Outubro de 2017
 Entrega do arquivo digital pelas empresas concessionárias e os consórcios contratados com a Agência Nacional de Petróleo, Gás Natural e Biocombustíveis - ANP para exploração e produção de petróleo ou gás natural, até o dia 25 de cada mês a partir do mês seguinte àquele em que ocorrer o início da produção de cada campo. Base legal: Dec. 36.928/2016 e Ajuste SINIEF 007/2015. Novembro de 2017
 25 ICMS Acessória - Boletim Mensal de Produção - BMP
 O arquivo digital do BMP e do DAPE será gerado pelas empresas concessionárias e os consórcios de acordo com as especificações do leiaute definido no Manual de Integração. A transmissão dos arquivos digitais deverá ser realizada no seguinte prazo; BMP, até o dia 25 (vinte e cinco) de cada mês a partir do mês seguinte àquele em que ocorrer o início da produção de cada campo. Base Legal: Art. 514-C inciso I do RICMS/PA. Outubro de 2017
 O prazo para pagamento do ISSQN, na prestação de serviços enquadrados no subitem 10.09 do artigo 102 da Lei n° 15.563/1991, por sujeitos passivos inscritos no Cadastro Mercantil de Contribuintes (CMC) na condição de sindicalizados, relativa ao exercício de 2017, expira no dia 25 (vinte e cinco) do mês subsequente ao da ocorrência do fato gerador. Base legal: Portaria n° 001/2017, artigo 6°. Outubro de 2017


text:
 23.4.2016
 HU
 Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja
 L 108/30
 A BIZOTTSÁG (EU) 2016/639 VÉGREHAJTÁSI RENDELETE
 (2016. április 22.)
 az egyes gyümölcs- és zöldségfélék behozatali árának meghatározására szolgáló behozatali átalányértékek megállapításáról
 AZ EURÓPAI BIZOTTSÁG,
 tekintettel az Európai Unió működéséről szóló szerződésre,
 tekintettel a mezőgazdasági termékpiacok közös szervezésének létrehozásáról, és a 922/72/EGK, a 234/79/EK, az 1037/2001/EK és az 1234/2007/EK tanácsi rendelet hatályon kívül helyezéséről szóló, 2013. december 17-i 1308/2013/EU európai parlamenti és tanácsi rendeletre (1),
 tekintettel az 1234/2007/EK tanácsi rendeletnek a gyümölcs- és zöldség-, valamint a feldolgozottgyümölcs- és feldolgozottzöldség-ágazatra alkalmazandó részletes szabályainak a megállapításáról szóló, 2011. június 7-i 543/2011/EU bizottsági végrehajtási rendeletre (2) és különösen annak 136. cikke (1) bekezdésére,
 mivel:
 (1)
 Az Uruguayi Forduló többoldalú kereskedelmi tárgyalásai eredményeinek megfelelően az 543/2011/EU végrehajtási rendelet a XVI. mellékletének A. részében szereplő termékek és időszakok tekintetében meghatározza azokat a szempontokat, amelyek alapján a Bizottság rögzíti a harmadik országokból történő behozatalra vonatkozó átalányértékeket.
 (2)
 Az 543/2011/EU végrehajtási rendelet 136. cikke (1) bekezdése alapján a behozatali átalányérték számítására munkanaponként, változó napi adatok figyelembevételével kerül sor. Ezért helyénvaló előírni, hogy e rendelet az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapjában való kihirdetésének napján lépjen hatályba,
 ELFOGADTA EZT A RENDELETET:
 1. cikk
 Az 543/2011/EU végrehajtási rendelet 136. cikkében említett behozatali átalányértékeket e rendelet melléklete határozza meg.
 2. cikk
 Ez a rendelet az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapjában való kihirdetésének napján lép hatályba.
 Ez a rendelet teljes egészében kötelező és közvetlenül alkalmazandó valamennyi tagállamban.
 Kelt Brüsszelben, 2016. április 22-én.
 a Bizottság részéről,
 az elnök nevében,
 Jerzy PLEWA
 mezőgazdasági és vidékfejlesztési főigazgató
 (1) HL L 347., 2013.12.20., 671. o.
 (2) HL L 157., 2011.6.15., 1. o.
 MELLÉKLET
 Az egyes gyümölcs- és zöldségfélék behozatali árának meghatározására szolgáló behozatali átalányértékek
 (EUR/100 kg)
 KN-kód
 Országkód (1)
 Behozatali átalányérték
 0702 00 00
 IL
 275,5
 MA
 97,8
 TR
 108,9
 ZZ
 160,7
 0707 00 05
 MA
 81,5
 TR
 107,2
 ZZ
 94,4
 0709 93 10
 MA
 99,6
 TR
 128,0
 ZZ
 113,8
 0805 10 20
 CR
 66,6
 EG
 50,0
 IL
 79,4
 MA
 60,7
 TR
 39,9
 ZZ
 59,3
 0805 50 10
 MA
 132,7
 ZZ
 132,7
 0808 10 80
 AR
 86,1
 BR
 101,0
 CL
 115,8
 CN
 90,8
 NZ
 159,8
 US
 177,1
 ZA
 85,2
 ZZ
 116,5
 0808 30 90
 AR
 128,4
 CL
 110,9
 CN
 90,6
 ZA
 109,5
 ZZ
 109,9
 (1) Az országoknak a Közösség harmadik országokkal folytatott külkereskedelmére vonatkozó statisztikáról szóló 471/2009/EK európai parlamenti és tanácsi rendeletnek az országok és területek nómenklatúrájának frissítése tekintetében történő végrehajtásáról szóló, 2012. november 27-i 1106/2012/EU bizottsági rendeletben (HL L 328., 2012.11.28., 7. o.) meghatározott nómenklatúrája szerint. A „ZZ” jelentése „egyéb származás”.


text:
 26.10.2012
 LV
 Eiropas Savienības Oficiālais Vēstnesis
 C 326/1
 26. PROTOKOLS
 PAR SABIEDRISKIEM PAKALPOJUMIEM
 AUGSTĀS LĪGUMSLĒDZĒJAS PUSES,
 VĒLOTIES uzsvērt sabiedrisku pakalpojumu nozīmi,
 IR VIENOJUŠĀS par šādiem skaidrojošiem noteikumiem, ko pievieno Līgumam par Eiropas Savienību un Līgumam par Eiropas Savienības darbību:
 1. pants
 Savienības kopīgās vērtības attiecībā uz sabiedriskiem pakalpojumiem Līguma par Eiropas Savienības darbību 14. panta nozīmē ir šādas:
 —
 valsts, reģionālo un vietējo iestāžu būtiskā nozīme un lielā rīcības brīvība, nodrošinot, pasūtot un organizējot sabiedriskus pakalpojumus, lai, cik vien iespējams, ievērotu patērētāju vajadzības;
 —
 daudzo sabiedrisko pakalpojumu dažādība un atšķirīgās patērētāju vajadzības un izvēles, ko var radīt atšķirīgs ģeogrāfiskais stāvoklis un sociālie un kultūras apstākļi;
 —
 augsts kvalitātes, drošības un pieejamības līmenis, vienlīdzīga attieksme un vispārējas piekļuves un patērētāju tiesību veicināšana.
 2. pants
 Līgumu noteikumi nekādā veidā neskar dalībvalstu kompetenci nodrošināt, pasūtīt un organizēt ar ekonomiku nesaistītus sabiedriskos pakalpojumus.