type: contracts

jurisdiction: EU

text:
 Avis juridique important
 |
 11972B/PRO/05
 DOKUMENTE BETREFFEND DEN BEITRITT ZU DEN EUROPAEISCHEN GEMEINSCHAFTEN DES KOENIGREICHS DAENEMARK, IRLANDS, DES KOENIGREICHS NORWEGEN UND DES VEREINIGTEN KOENIGREICHS GROSSBRITANNIEN UND NORDIRLAND, PROTOKOLL NR. 5 BETREFFEND SVALBARD ( SPITZBERGEN ) ( * )
 Amtsblatt Nr. L 073 vom 27/03/1972 S. 0165
 ++++ PROTOKOLL NR . 5 BETREFFEND SVALBARD ( SPITZBERGEN ) ARTIKEL 1 DEM KÖNIGREICH NORWEGEN STEHT ES FREI, DIE RATIFIKATION DES VERTRAGES ÜBER DEN BEITRITT ZUR EUROPÄISCHEN WIRTSCHAFTSGEMEINSCHAFT UND ZUR EUROPÄISCHEN ATOMGEMEINSCHAFT SOWIE DIE HINTERLEGUNG DER URKUNDE ÜBER DEN BEITRITT ZUR EUROPÄISCHEN GEMEINSCHAFT FÜR KOHLE UND STAHL NUR FÜR DAS HOHEITSGEBIET DES KÖNIGREICHS UNTER AUSSCHLUSS VON SVALBARD VORZUNEHMEN . ARTIKEL 2 MACHT NORWEGEN VON DIESER MÖGLICHKEIT GEBRAUCH, SO GELTEN FOLGENDE BESTIMMUNGEN : A ) EINE ÄNDERUNG DER ZOLLREGELUNG FÜR DIE EINFUHR VON WAREN MIT URSPRUNG IN UND HERKUNFT AUS SVALBARD NACH NORWEGEN IST NICHT ERFORDERLICH; B ) DIE AUSFUHR VON SVALBARD UMFASST GEGENWÄRTIG AUSSCHLIESSLICH KOHLE UND WIRFT KEINE KONKRETEN PROBLEME AUF . SOWEIT SICH DIESE SACHLAGE, INSBESONDERE INFOLGE VON BESCHLÜSSEN, DIE GEGEBENENFALLS IM RAHMEN DER GEMEINSAMEN POLITIK GEFASST WERDEN, ÄNDERT, PRÜFEN DIE ORGANE DER GEMEINSCHAFT DIESE FRAGE ERNEUT, UM DEN AUSWIRKUNGEN RECHNUNG ZU TRAGEN, DIE EINE SOLCHE ÄNDERUNG FÜR DIE AUF EINFUHREN AUS SVALBARD ANWENDBARE REGELUNG HABEN KÖNNTE; C ) DIE IM RAHMEN DER UNTER BUCHSTABE A ) GENANNTEN REGELUNG NACH NORWEGEN EINGEFÜHRTEN WAREN KÖNNEN NICHT ALS IN NORWEGEN IM FREIEN VERKEHR IM SINNE DES ARTIKELS 10 DES EWG-VERTRAGS BEFINDLICH ANGESEHEN WERDEN, WENN SIE IN EINEN ANDEREN MITGLIEDSTAAT WIEDERAUSGEFÜHRT WERDEN .


text:
 25.9.2008
 FI
 Euroopan unionin virallinen lehti
 L 257/37
 ETA:n SEKAKOMITEAN PÄÄTÖS
 N:o 73/2008,
 tehty 6 päivänä kesäkuuta 2008,
 ETA-sopimuksen liitteen XX (Ympäristö) muuttamisesta
 ETA:n SEKAKOMITEA, joka
 ottaa huomioon Euroopan talousalueesta tehdyn sopimuksen, sellaisena kuin se on muutettuna Euroopan talousalueesta tehdyn sopimuksen tarkistamisesta tehdyllä pöytäkirjalla, jäljempänä ’sopimus’, ja erityisesti sen 98 artiklan,
 sekä katsoo seuraavaa:
 (1)
 Sopimuksen liite XX muutettiin 25 päivänä huhtikuuta 2008 tehdyllä ETA:n sekakomitean päätöksellä N:o 56/2008 (1).
 (2)
 Jätteiden siirrosta 14 päivänä kesäkuuta 2006 annettu Euroopan parlamentin ja neuvoston asetus (EY) N:o 1013/2006 (2) olisi otettava osaksi sopimusta.
 (3)
 Asetuksella (EY) N:o 1013/2006 kumotaan 12 päivästä heinäkuuta 2007 alkaen neuvoston asetus (ETY) N:o 259/93 (3) ja komission päätös 94/774/EY (4), jotka on otettu osaksi sopimusta ja jotka näin ollen olisi poistettava sopimuksesta.
 (4)
 Liechtensteinin osalta asetukseen (ETY) N:o 259/93 ja päätökseen 94/774/EY tehtyjen ETA-sopimusta sovellettaessa sovellettavien mukautusten asiasisältö on pidettävä voimassa,
 ON PÄÄTTÄNYT SEURAAVAA:
 1 artikla
 Muutetaan sopimuksen liite XX seuraavasti:
 1)
 Korvataan 32c kohta (neuvoston asetus (ETY) N:o 259/93) seuraavasti:
 ”32006 R 1013: Euroopan parlamentin ja neuvoston asetus (EY) N:o 1013/2006, annettu 14 päivänä kesäkuuta 2006, jätteiden siirrosta (EUVL L 190, 12.7.2006, s. 1).
 Latvian (liitteessä VIII olevan 10 luvun B jakson 1 kohta), Unkarin (liitteessä X olevan 8 luvun A jakson 1 kohdan), Maltan (liitteessä XI olevan 10 luvun B jakson 1 kohdan), Puolan (liitteessä XII olevan 13 luvun B jakson 1 kohdan) ja Slovakian (liitteessä XIV olevan 9 luvun B jakson 1 kohdan) osalta 16 päivänä huhtikuuta 2003 allekirjoitetun liittymisasiakirjan liitteissä määrättyjä siirtymäjärjestelyjä, jotka koskevat asetusta (ETY) N:o 259/93, sovelletaan soveltuvin osin.
 Bulgarian (liitteessä VI olevan 10 luvun B jakson 1 kohdan) ja Romanian (liitteessä VII olevan 9 luvun B jakson 1 kohdan) osalta 25 päivänä huhtikuuta 2005 allekirjoitetun liittymisasiakirjan liitteissä määrättyjä siirtymäjärjestelyjä, jotka koskevat asetusta (ETY) N:o 259/93, sovelletaan soveltuvin osin.
 Tätä sopimusta sovellettaessa asetuksen säännöksiä koskevat seuraavat mukautukset:
 a)
 Mitä tulee hyödynnettäväksi tarkoitettujen jätteiden vientiin (asetuksen IV osasto, 2 luku), Liechtenstein katsotaan valtioksi, johon sovelletaan OECD:n päätöstä.
 b)
 Sveitsissä hävitettävän tai uudelleen käytettävän vaarallisen jätteen osalta Liechtenstein voi käyttää sveitsiläisiä ilmoitus- ja siirtoasiakirjoja asetuksen liitteenä olevien vakiolomakkeiden sijasta.
 c)
 Lisätään 2 artiklan 29 kohdassa sanat ’tai EFTA-valtioiden alueelle’ sanojen ’yhteisön tullialueelle’ jälkeen.”
 2)
 Korvataan 32aa kohdan mukautuksessa (komission päätös 2000/532/EY) sanat ”sekä mainittu neuvoston asetuksessa (ETY) N:o 259/93” lauseen lopussa sanoilla ”sekä mainittu Euroopan parlamentin ja neuvoston asetuksessa (EY) N:o 1013/2006”.
 3)
 Poistetaan 3ca kohdan (komission päätös 94/774/EY) teksti.
 2 artikla
 Asetuksen (EY) N:o 1013/2006 islanniksi ja norjaksi laaditut tekstit, jotka julkaistaan Euroopan unionin virallisen lehden ETA-täydennysosassa, ovat todistusvoimaisia.
 3 artikla
 Tämä päätös tulee voimaan 7 päivänä kesäkuuta 2008, jos kaikki sopimuksen 103 artiklan 1 kohdan mukaiset ilmoitukset on tehty ETA:n sekakomitealle (5).
 4 artikla
 Tämä päätös julkaistaan Euroopan unionin virallisen lehden ETA-osastossa ja ETA-täydennysosassa.
 Tehty Brysselissä 6 päivänä kesäkuuta 2008.
 ETA:n sekakomitean puolesta
 Puheenjohtaja
 Alan SEATTER
 (1) EUVL L 223, 21.8.2008, s. 54.
 (2) EUVL L 190, 12.7.2006, s. 1.
 (3) EYVL L 30, 6.2.1993, s. 1.
 (4) EYVL L 310, 3.12.1994, s. 70.
 (5) Valtiosäännön asettamat vaatimukset on ilmoitettu.


text:
 10.3.2005
 PT
 Jornal Oficial da União Europeia
 L 64/80
 DECISÃO DO COMITÉ MISTO DO EEE
 N.o 137/2004
 de 24 de Setembro de 2004
 que altera o Protocolo n.o 31 do Acordo EEE relativo à cooperação em domínios específicos não abrangidos pelas quatro liberdades
 O COMITÉ MISTO DO EEE,
 Tendo em conta o Acordo sobre o Espaço Económico Europeu, alterado pelo protocolo que adapta o Acordo sobre o Espaço Económico Europeu, a seguir designado «o acordo», nomeadamente os artigos 86.o e 98.o,
 Considerando o seguinte:
 (1)
 O Protocolo n.o 31 do acordo foi alterado pela Decisão do Comité Misto do EEE n.o 90/2004 de 8 de Junho de 2004 (1).
 (2)
 A Decisão n.o 1230/2003/CE do Parlamento Europeu e do Conselho, de 26 de Junho de 2003, que aprova o programa plurianual de acções no domínio da energia: programa «Energia inteligente — Europa» (2003‐2006) (2), foi incorporada no acordo pela Decisão do Comité Misto do EEE n.o 164/2003 de 7 de Novembro de 2003 (3).
 (3)
 Afigura‐se adequado alargar a cooperação das partes contratantes no acordo a fim de nele incluir o domínio específico «Coopener» do programa, assim como as acções com ele relacionadas.
 (4)
 Assim sendo, o Protocolo n.o 31 do acordo deve ser alterado, a fim de que esta cooperação alargada possa produzir efeitos a partir de 1 de Janeiro de 2005,
 DECIDE:
 Artigo 1.o
 Ao Protocolo n.o 31 do acordo, no artigo 14.o, no ponto 2e, é aditado o seguinte travessão:
 —
 «A partir de 1 de Janeiro de 2005, os Estados da EFTA participarão no domínio específico “Coopener”, assim como nas acções relacionadas com o mesmo, no âmbito do programa referido no ponto 5g.».
 Artigo 2.o
 A presente decisão entra em vigor em 25 de Setembro de 2004, desde que tenham sido efectuadas ao Comité Misto do EEE todas as notificações, em conformidade com o disposto no n.o 1 do artigo 103.o do acordo (4).
 É aplicável a partir de 1 de Janeiro de 2005.
 Artigo 3.o
 A presente decisão será publicada na secção EEE e no suplemento EEE do Jornal Oficial da União Europeia.
 Feito em Bruxelas, em 24 de Setembro de 2004.
 Pelo Comité Misto do EEE
 O Presidente
 Kjartan JÓHANNSSON
 (1) JO L 349 de 25.11.2004, p. 52.
 (2) JO L 176 de 15.7.2003, p. 29.
 (3) JO L 41 de 12.2.2004, p. 67.
 (4) São indicados os requisitos constitucionais.


text:
 24.1.2013
 NL
 Publicatieblad van de Europese Unie
 L 21/51
 BESLUIT VAN HET GEMENGD COMITÉ VAN DE EER
 Nr. 201/2012
 van 26 oktober 2012
 tot wijziging van bijlage XX (Milieu) bij de EER-overeenkomst
 HET GEMENGD COMITÉ VAN DE EER,
 Gezien de Overeenkomst betreffende de Europese Economische Ruimte (de EER-overeenkomst), en met name artikel 98,
 Overwegende hetgeen volgt:
 (1)
 Besluit 2010/709/EU van de Commissie van 22 november 2010 tot oprichting van het Europees Bureau voor de milieukeur van de Europese Unie (1) dient in de EER-overeenkomst te worden opgenomen.
 (2)
 Besluit 2011/263/EU van de Commissie van 28 april 2011 tot vaststelling van de milieucriteria voor de toekenning van de EU-milieukeur aan machineafwasmiddelen (2) dient in de EER-overeenkomst te worden opgenomen.
 (3)
 Besluit 2011/264/EU van de Commissie van 28 april 2011 tot vaststelling van de milieucriteria voor de toekenning van de EU-milieukeur voor wasmiddelen (3) dient in de EER-overeenkomst te worden opgenomen.
 (4)
 Besluit 2011/330/EU van de Commissie van 6 juni 2011 tot vaststelling van de milieucriteria voor de toekenning van de EU-milieukeur voor notebookcomputers (4) dient in de EER-overeenkomst te worden opgenomen.
 (5)
 Besluit 2011/331/EU van de Commissie van 6 juni 2011 tot vaststelling van de milieucriteria voor de toekenning van de EU-milieukeur voor lichtbronnen (5) dient in de EER-overeenkomst te worden opgenomen.
 (6)
 Besluit 2011/333/EU van de Commissie van 7 juni 2011 tot vaststelling van de milieucriteria voor de toekenning van de EU-milieukeur voor kopieerpapier en grafisch papier (6), gerectificeerd in PB L 161 van 21.6.2011, blz. 34, dient in de EER-overeenkomst te worden opgenomen.
 (7)
 Besluit 2011/337/EU van de Commissie van 9 juni 2011 tot vaststelling van de milieucriteria voor de toekenning van de EU-milieukeur voor personal computers (7) dient in de EER-overeenkomst te worden opgenomen.
 (8)
 Besluit 2011/381/EU van de Commissie van 24 juni 2011 tot vaststelling van de milieucriteria voor de toekenning van de EU-milieukeur aan smeermiddelen (8) dient in de EER-overeenkomst te worden opgenomen.
 (9)
 Besluit 2011/382/EU van de Commissie van 24 juni 2011 tot vaststelling van de milieucriteria voor de toekenning van de EU-milieukeur aan handafwasmiddelen (9) dient in de EER-overeenkomst te worden opgenomen.
 (10)
 Besluit 2011/383/EU van de Commissie van 28 juni 2011 tot vaststelling van de milieucriteria voor de toekenning van de EU-milieukeur aan allesreinigers en sanitairreinigers (10), gerectificeerd in PB L 110 van 24.4.2012, blz. 44, dient in de EER-overeenkomst te worden opgenomen.
 (11)
 De in de EER-overeenkomst opgenomen Beschikking 2000/730/EG van de Commissie (11) wordt bij Besluit 2010/709/EU ingetrokken en dient derhalve uit de EER-overeenkomst te worden geschrapt.
 (12)
 De in de EER-overeenkomst opgenomen Beschikking 2003/31/EG van de Commissie (12) wordt bij Besluit 2011/263/EU ingetrokken en dient derhalve uit de EER-overeenkomst te worden geschrapt.
 (13)
 De in de EER-overeenkomst opgenomen Beschikking 2003/200/EG van de Commissie (13) wordt bij Besluit 2011/264/EU ingetrokken en dient derhalve uit de EER-overeenkomst te worden geschrapt.
 (14)
 De in de EER-overeenkomst opgenomen Beschikking 2005/343/EG van de Commissie (14) wordt bij Besluit 2011/330/EU ingetrokken en dient derhalve uit de EER-overeenkomst te worden geschrapt.
 (15)
 De in de EER-overeenkomst opgenomen Beschikking 2002/747/EG van de Commissie (15) wordt bij Besluit 2011/331/EU ingetrokken en dient derhalve uit de EER-overeenkomst te worden geschrapt.
 (16)
 De in de EER-overeenkomst opgenomen Beschikking 2002/741/EG van de Commissie (16) wordt bij Besluit 2011/333/EU ingetrokken en dient derhalve uit de EER-overeenkomst te worden geschrapt.
 (17)
 De in de EER-overeenkomst opgenomen Beschikking 2005/341/EG van de Commissie (17) wordt bij Besluit 2011/337/EU ingetrokken en dient derhalve uit de EER-overeenkomst te worden geschrapt.
 (18)
 De in de EER-overeenkomst opgenomen Beschikking 2005/360/EG van de Commissie (18) wordt bij Besluit 2011/381/EU ingetrokken en dient derhalve uit de EER-overeenkomst te worden geschrapt.
 (19)
 De in de EER-overeenkomst opgenomen Beschikking 2005/342/EG van de Commissie (19) wordt bij Besluit 2011/382/EU ingetrokken en dient derhalve uit de EER-overeenkomst te worden geschrapt.
 (20)
 De in de EER-overeenkomst opgenomen Beschikking 2005/344/EG van de Commissie (20) wordt bij Besluit 2011/383/EU ingetrokken en dient derhalve uit de EER-overeenkomst te worden geschrapt.
 (21)
 Bijlage XX bij de EER-overeenkomst dient derhalve dienovereenkomstig te worden gewijzigd,
 HEEFT HET VOLGENDE BESLUIT VASTGESTELD:
 Artikel 1
 Bijlage XX bij de EER-overeenkomst wordt als volgt gewijzigd:
 1)
 De tekst van punt 2ad (Beschikking 2000/730/EG van de Commissie) wordt vervangen door:
 „32010 D 0709: Besluit 2010/709/EU van de Commissie van 22 november 2010 tot oprichting van het Europees Bureau voor de milieukeur van de Europese Unie (PB L 308 van 24.11.2010, blz. 53).”.
 2)
 De tekst van punt 2e (Beschikking 2003/200/EG van de Commissie) wordt vervangen door:
 „32011 D 0264: Besluit 2011/264/EU van de Commissie van 28 april 2011 tot vaststelling van de milieucriteria voor de toekenning van de EU-milieukeur voor wasmiddelen (PB L 111 van 30.4.2011, blz. 34).”.
 3)
 De tekst van punt 2h (Beschikking 2003/31/EG van de Commissie) wordt vervangen door:
 „32011 D 0263: Besluit 2011/263/EU van de Commissie van 28 april 2011 tot vaststelling van de milieucriteria voor de toekenning van de EU-milieukeur aan machineafwasmiddelen (PB L 111 van 30.4.2011, blz. 22).”.
 4)
 De tekst van punt 2o (Beschikking 2002/747/EG van de Commissie) wordt vervangen door:
 „32011 D 0331: Besluit 2011/331/EU van de Commissie van 6 juni 2011 tot vaststelling van de milieucriteria voor de toekenning van de EU-milieukeur voor lichtbronnen (PB L 148 van 7.6.2011, blz. 13).”.
 5)
 De tekst van punt 2q (Beschikking 2005/341/EG van de Commissie) wordt vervangen door:
 „32011 D 0337: Besluit 2011/337/EU van de Commissie van 9 juni 2011 tot vaststelling van de milieucriteria voor de toekenning van de EU-milieukeur voor personal computers (PB L 151 van 10.6.2011, blz. 5).”.
 6)
 De tekst van punt 2r (Beschikking 2005/342/EG van de Commissie) wordt vervangen door:
 „32011 D 0382: Besluit 2011/382/EU van de Commissie van 24 juni 2011 tot vaststelling van de milieucriteria voor de toekenning van de EU-milieukeur aan handafwasmiddelen (PB L 169 van 29.6.2011, blz. 40).”.
 7)
 De tekst van punt 2s (Beschikking 2005/343/EG van de Commissie) wordt vervangen door:
 „32011 D 0330: Besluit 2011/330/EU van de Commissie van 6 juni 2011 tot vaststelling van de milieucriteria voor de toekenning van de EU-milieukeur voor notebookcomputers (PB L 148 van 7.6.2011, blz. 5).”.
 8)
 De tekst van punt 2t (Beschikking 2005/344/EG van de Commissie) wordt vervangen door:
 „32011 D 0383: Besluit 2011/383/EU van de Commissie van 28 juni 2011 tot vaststelling van de milieucriteria voor de toekenning van de EU-milieukeur aan allesreinigers en sanitairreinigers (PB L 169 van 29.6.2011, blz. 52), gerectificeerd in PB L 110 van 24.4.2012, blz. 44.”.
 9)
 De tekst van punt 2u (Beschikking 2005/360/EG van de Commissie) wordt vervangen door:
 „32011 D 0381: Besluit 2011/381/EU van de Commissie van 24 juni 2011 tot vaststelling van de milieucriteria voor de toekenning van de EU-milieukeur aan smeermiddelen (PB L 169 van 29.6.2011, blz. 28).”.
 10)
 De tekst van punt 2x (Beschikking 2002/741/EG van de Commissie) wordt vervangen door:
 „32011 D 0333: Besluit 2011/333/EU van de Commissie van 7 juni 2011 tot vaststelling van de milieucriteria voor de toekenning van de EU-milieukeur voor kopieerpapier en grafisch papier (PB L 149 van 8.6.2011, blz. 12), gerectificeerd in PB L 161 van 21.6.2011, blz. 34.”.
 Artikel 2
 De in het EER-supplement bij het Publicatieblad van de Europese Unie bekend te maken teksten in de IJslandse en de Noorse taal van de Besluiten 2010/709/EU, 2011/263/EU, 2011/264/EU, 2011/330/EU, 2011/331/EU, 2011/333/EU, gerectificeerd in PB L 161 van 21.6.2011, blz. 34, 2011/337/EU, 2011/381/EU, 2011/382/EU en 2011/383/EU, gerectificeerd in PB L 110 van 24.4.2012, blz. 44, zijn authentiek.
 Artikel 3
 Dit besluit treedt in werking op 1 november 2012, op voorwaarde dat alle in artikel 103, lid 1, van de EER-overeenkomst bedoelde kennisgevingen aan het Gemengd Comité van de EER hebben plaatsgevonden (21), of op de dag van inwerkingtreding van Besluit nr. 200/2012 van het Gemengd Comité van de EER van 26 oktober 2012 (22), als dat later is.
 Artikel 4
 Dit besluit wordt bekendgemaakt in het EER-gedeelte van en in het EER-supplement bij het Publicatieblad van de Europese Unie.
 Gedaan te Brussel, 26 oktober 2012.
 Voor het Gemengd Comité van de EER
 De voorzitter
 Atle LEIKVOLL
 (1) PB L 308 van 24.11.2010, blz. 53.
 (2) PB L 111 van 30.4.2011, blz. 22.
 (3) PB L 111 van 30.4.2011, blz. 34.
 (4) PB L 148 van 7.6.2011, blz. 5.
 (5) PB L 148 van 7.6.2011, blz. 13.
 (6) PB L 149 van 8.6.2011, blz. 12.
 (7) PB L 151 van 10.6.2011, blz. 5.
 (8) PB L 169 van 29.6.2011, blz. 28.
 (9) PB L 169 van 29.6.2011, blz. 40.
 (10) PB L 169 van 29.6.2011, blz. 52.
 (11) PB L 293 van 22.11.2000, blz. 24.
 (12) PB L 9 van 15.1.2003, blz. 11.
 (13) PB L 76 van 22.3.2003, blz. 25.
 (14) PB L 115 van 4.5.2005, blz. 35.
 (15) PB L 242 van 10.9.2002, blz. 44.
 (16) PB L 237 van 5.9.2002, blz. 6.
 (17) PB L 115 van 4.5.2005, blz. 1.
 (18) PB L 118 van 5.5.2005, blz. 26.
 (19) PB L 115 van 4.5.2005, blz. 9.
 (20) PB L 115 van 4.5.2005, blz. 42.
 (21) Geen grondwettelijke vereisten aangegeven.
 (22) Zie bladzijde 50 van dit Publicatieblad.


type: caselaw

text:
 7.3.2009
 LT
 Europos Sąjungos oficialusis leidinys
 C 55/47
 2009 m. sausio 14 d. pareikštas ieškinys byloje Özdemir prieš VRDT — Aktieselskabet af 21. november 2001 (James Jones)
 (Byla T-11/09)
 (2009/C 55/85)
 Kalba, kuria surašytas ieškinys: anglų
 Šalys
 Ieškovas: Rahmi Özdemir (Drejeichas, Vokietija), atstovaujamas advokatų M. Heinrich, I. Hoes, C. Schröder, K. von Werder ir J. Wittenberg
 Atsakovė: Vidaus rinkos derinimo tarnyba (prekių ženklams ir pramoniniam dizainui)
 Kita procedūros Apeliacinėje taryboje šalis: Aktieselskabet af 21. november 2001 (Brandė, Danija)
 Ieškovo reikalavimai
 —
 Panaikinti 2008 m. lapkričio 3 d. Vidaus rinkos derinimo tarnybos (prekių ženklams ir pramoniniam dizainui) antrosios apeliacinės tarybos sprendimą byloje R 858/2007-2.
 —
 Atmesti kitos procedūros Apeliacinėje taryboje šalies 2005 m. sausio 25 d. protestą dėl paraiškos įregistruoti Bendrijos prekių ženklą (paraiškos Nr. 3 493 137).
 —
 Priteisti iš kitos procedūros Apeliacinėje taryboje šalies bylinėjimosi išlaidas, įskaitant išlaidas, patirtas protesto procedūroje.
 Ieškinio pagrindai ir pagrindiniai argumentai
 Bendrijos prekių ženklo paraišką pateikęs asmuo: ieškovas.
 Prašomas įregistruoti Bendrijos prekių ženklas: žodinis prekių ženklas „James Jones“ 25 klasės prekėms.
 Prekių ženklo ar žymens, kuriuo grindžiamas protestas, savininkas: kita procedūros Apeliacinėje taryboje šalis.
 Prekių ženklas ar žymuo, kuriuo grindžiamas protestas: žodinis Bendrijos prekių ženklas „Jack & Jones“ 3, 18 ir 25 klasių prekėms (registracijos Nr. 1 107 747), žodinis Jungtinės Karalystės prekių ženklas „Jack Jones“ 25 klasės prekėms (registracijos Nr. 2 063 437), žodinis Beniliukso prekių ženklas „Jack Jones“ 25 klasės prekėms (registracijos Nr. 474 622) ir žodinis Danijos prekių ženklas „Jack & Jones“ 25 klasės prekėms (registracijos Nr. VR 1990 06569).
 Protestų skyriaus sprendimas: patenkinti protestą dėl visų ginčijamų prekių.
 Apeliacinės tarybos sprendimas: atmesti apeliaciją.
 Ieškinio pagrindai: Tarybos reglamento (EB) Nr. 40/94 8 straipsnio 1 dalies b punkto pažeidimas, nes Apeliacinė taryba klaidingai įvertino, kad yra galimybė supainioti nagrinėjamus prekių ženklus; Tarybos reglamento (EB) Nr. 40/94 43 straipsnio 2 dalies pažeidimas, nes Apeliacinei tarybai nebuvo pateikta įrodymų, kad Jungtinės Karalystės prekių ženklas (registracijos Nr. 2 063 437) buvo naudojamas.


type: wikipedia

text:
Milton Friedman (31. juulil 1912 – 16. november 2006) oli USA majandusteadlane, keda peetakse üheks olulisimaks majandusteadlaseks 20. sajandil. Põhjapanev oli tema töö rahateooria vallas – Friedmani töödest lähtub olulises osas tänapäevane arusaam inflatsioonist ja rahapoliitika sõltumatus valitsusest (ehk keskpankade sõltumatus, kuigi ta ise pooldas rahapakkumise määramist mehaaniliselt ja keskpankade täielikku kaotamist).
 Friedman argumenteeris fikseeritud valuutakursside vastu ja (tänapäeval üldlevinud) turu määratud vahetuskursside poolt (vaba kursi ainsa alternatiivina nägi ta valuutakomitee süsteemi). Lisaks sellele andis ta olulise panuse tarbijakäitumise uurimisse (püsiva tulu hüpotees), majandusajalukku, statistikasse (statistilised mudelid kvaliteedikontrollis) ja majanduse metodoloogiasse. Friedmani teadustöö, mida iseloomustab tugev keskendumine empiirikale, muutis tihti põhjalikult kaasaegset ettekujutust majandusest ja oli aluseks majanduspoliitikat valitsenud keinsismi langusele 1980. aastatel.
 Ta oli Newsweeki kolumnist ja on olnud ka USA presidendi nõuandja.
 Avaldatud mitteteadustöödest on tähelepanu köitnud "Kapitalism ja vabadus" ning "Valikuvabadus". Tööde avaldamisele on kaasa aidanud abikaasa Rosa.
 Elulugu
 Friedman sündis Brooklynis (New York) Ungari juudi töölisklassi perekonnas. Friedman kasvas üles Rahways (New Jersey), käis Rutgersi Ülikoolis, mille lõpetas bakalaureusekraadiga majanduses 1932, ja Chicago ülikoolis (lõpetas magistrikraadiga 1933). Filosoofiadoktori kraadi sai ta aastal 1946 pärast töötamist föderaalvalitsuses ja Columbia Ülikoolis.
 1946–1976 töötas ta Chicago Ülikoolis majandusprofessorina. Aastal 1975 pidas Friedman loenguid ka Tšiilis militaarse diktaatori Augusto Pinocheti valitsuse ajal. Sel ajal Tšiili ülikoolis doktorikraadi saanuid kutsuti "Chicago poisteks". Kui Friedman sai 1976. aastal Nobeli auhinna majanduses, protestisid just Tšiili valitsuse toetamise pärast paljud demonstrandid Friedmani vastu.
 Alates 1977 oli Friedman seotud Hoover Institutioniga Stanfordi ülikooli juures.
 Aastal 1981 töötas ta Ameerika Ühendriikide presidendi Ronald Reagani juures majanduspoliitika nõustamise alal. 1988 sai ta Presidendi Vabadusmedali ja Rahvusliku Teaduse medali.
 Ühiskondlik tegevus ja poliitilised seisukohad
 Friedman võttis aktiivselt osa ühiskondlikest debattidest. 1960. aastatel asus ta kritiseerima kohustuslikku sõjaväeteenistust ning ta kaasati president Nixoni moodustatud sõjaväeteenistuse tuleviku üle arutlevasse nõuandvasse komisjoni (Gates Commission), kus Friedman oli üks juhtivaid sõjaväeteenistusevastaseid. Kohustuslik sõjaväeteenistus kaotati USA-s 1973. aastal (peamine põhjus oli siiski selgelt Vietnami sõjast tulenev ühiskondlik vastuseis, mis oli tinginud ka komisjoni loomise), selle protsessi mõjutamist on Friedman hiljem pidanud oma suurimaks saavutuseks.
 Teema, mis oli Friedmanile südamelähedane kogu ta elu jooksul, oli koolisüsteemi reform, kus ta propageeris suuremat valikuvabadust vanematele läbi kooliosakute (vautšerite) kasutuselevõtu. Kooliosakud pidid tagama võimaluse valida koolide vahel ning lõpetama nii-öelda elukohajärgse koolidesse suunamise, tekitades niimoodi koolide vahele konkurentsi (selline süsteem on ekvivalentne riigi määratud pearahaga ja vanemate võimalusega vabalt kooli valida).
 2005 kutsus Friedman ühes enam kui 500 majandusteadlasega üles diskussioonile marihuaana legaliseerimise üle. Ta on väljendanud arvamust prostitutsiooni dekriminaliseerimise poolt. Koos teiste tuntud majandusteadlastega võttis ta avalikult sõna autoriõiguste kehtivuse pikendamise vastu USA-s.
 Friedman on tuntud kui vabaturumajanduse liberaalsete ideede propageerija. Friedman pooldab valitsuse vähest sekkumist majandusse. Valitsusel on küll kohustus pakkuda selliseid hüviseid, millega turg hakkama ei saa, kuid sekkumiskriteeriumidele vastav hüviste hulk on suhteliselt piiratud ning tema hinnangul on riik võtnud enda kätte tegevusalasid, millega turg paremini hakkama saaks (näiteks postiveo riiklik monopol USA-s).
 Kriitikat
 Milton Friedmani majanduspoliitilised kriitikud (vasakpoolsed) heidavad talle ette monetarismi järginud Suurbritannia ja Tšiili majandusliku ebastabiilsust ja vaesust (ka suhtelist vaesust). Ja sellest tingitud tagajärgi. Nii tabas Suurbritanniat 1980. aastatel suur tööpuudus (eriti noorte seas: 40%).
 Tunnustus
 1957 – valiti Ameerika Filosoofiaseltsi liikmeks
 1976 – Nobeli majandusauhind
 Mälestuse jäädvustamine
 Alates 2002. aastast annab Cato Instituut USA-s välja Milton Friedmani auhinda vabaduse edendamise eest. Seni on auhinna saanud Peter Bauer, Hernando de Soto, Mart Laar ja Yon Goicoechea.
 Teosed
 Capitalism and Freedom ISBN 0-226-26401-7
 Free to Choose: A Personal Statement ISBN 0-15-633460-7
 Monetary History of the United States, 1867-1960 (with Anna Schwartz) ISBN 0-691-00354-8
 Money Mischief: Episodes in Monetary History ISBN 0-15-162042-3
 Price Theory ISBN 3-11-010987-5
 Economic Freedom, Human Freedom, Political Freedom ISBN 1-883969-00-X
 Two Lucky People: Memoirs (with Rose Friedman) ISBN 0-226-26414-9
 Why Government Is the Problem ISBN 0-8179-5442-2
 Milton Friedman in South Africa ISBN 0-7992-0205-3
 Teosed eesti keeles
 Rose & Milton Friedman, "Valikuvabadus: isiklik arvamus". Tõlkinud Raivo Rammus. Olion, Tallinn 1992
 Milton Friedman, "Kapitalism ja vabadus". Tõlkinud Karin Pütsep. Eesti Avatud Ühiskonna Instituut, Tallinn 1994
 Milton Friedman ja Robert Mundell, "Üks maailm, üks raha?". Tõlkinud Maris Kaskmann – Akadeemia 2004, nr. 5, lk. 1019–1061
 Vaata ka
 Monetarism
 Liberalism
 Viited
 Välislingid
 Telesari "Free to Choose"
 Ameerika Ühendriikide majandusteadlased
 Nobeli majandusauhinna laureaadid
 Sündinud 1912
 Surnud 2006


text:
 Dôležité právne oznámenie
 |
 22000D0210(12)
 Úradný vestník L 035 , 10/02/2000 S. 0043 - 0044
 Rozhodnutie Spoločného výboru EHPč. 12/1999z 29. januára 1999,ktorým sa mení a dopĺňa príloha XV (Štátna pomoc) k Dohode o EHPSPOLOČNÝ VÝBOR EHP,so zreteľom na Dohodu o Európskom hospodárskom priestore, v znení protokolu, ktorým sa upravuje Dohoda o Európskom hospodárskom priestore, ďalej len "dohoda", a najmä na jej článok 98,keďže príloha XV k dohode bola zmenená a doplnená rozhodnutím Spoločného výboru EHP č. 20/98 zo 6. marca 1998 [1];keďže nariadenie Rady (ES) č. 1540/98 z 29. júna 1998, ktorým sa ustanovujú nové pravidlá pomoci pre stavbu lodí [2] sa má včleniť do dohody,ROZHODOL TAKTO:Článok 1"398 R 1540: Nariadenie Rady (ES) č. 1540/98 z 29. júna 1998, ktorým sa ustanovujú nové pravidlá pomoci pre stavbu lodí (Ú. v. ES L 202, 18.7.1998, s. 1).Ustanovenia smernice sa na účely tejto dohody čítajú s týmito úpravami:a) pojem "členský štát" sa nahrádza pojmom "členský štát spoločenstva alebo štát EZVO". Pojem "členské štáty" sa nahrádza pojmom "členské štáty alebo štáty EZVO";b) pojem "Komisia" sa nahrádza pojmom "príslušný dozorný úrad podľa článku 62 dohody o EHP";c) pojem "zlučiteľný so spoločným trhom" sa nahrádza pojmom "zlučiteľný s fungovaním dohody o EHP";d) v článku 1 písm. e) sa pojem "štátna pomoc v zmysle článkov 92 a 93 zmluvy" nahrádza pojmom "štátna pomoc v zmysle článkov 61 a 62 dohody o EHP";e) "usmernenia spoločenstva o štátnej pomoci pre námornú dopravua procedurálne a hmotné pravidlá dozorného úradu EZVO v oblasti štátnej pomoci, kapitola 24A o pomoci pre námornú dopravu[4];f) v článku 4 ods. 4 sa pojem "právne predpisy a pravidlá spoločenstva" nahrádza pojmom "pravidlá podľa dohody o EHP";g) "usmernenia o štátnej pomoci pre záchranu a reštrukturalizáciu podnikov, ktoré majú ťažkostia procedurálne a hmotné pravidlá dozorného úradu EZVO v oblasti štátnej pomoci, kapitola 16 o pomoci pre záchranu a reštrukturalizáciu podnikov, ktoré majú ťažkosti[6];h) v článku 7 sa pojmy "článok 92 ods. 3 písm. a) zmluvy" a "článok 92 ods. 3 písm. c) zmluvy" nahrádzajú pojmami "článok 61 ods. 3 písm. a)" a článok 61 ods. 3 písm. c);i) "uplatniteľné usmernenia spoločenstva o regionálnej pomocia procedurálne a hmotné pravidlá dozorného úradu EZVO v oblasti štátnej pomoci, časť VI, pravidlá o regionálnej pomoci[8];j) "rámec spoločenstva pre štátnu pomoc pre výskum a vývoja procedurálne a hmotné pravidlá dozorného úradu EZVO v oblasti štátnej pomoci, kapitola 14 o pomoci pre výskum a vývoj[10];k) "usmernenia spoločenstva o štátnej pomoci pre ochranu životného prostrediaa procedurálne a hmotné pravidlá dozorného úradu EZVO v oblasti štátnej pomoci, kapitola 15 o pomoci pre životné prostredie[12];l) v článku 10 ods. 1 sa slová "článok 93 zmluvy" nahrádzajú slovami "článok 62 dohody o EHP". V článku 10 ods. 2 sa slová "článok 92 zmluvy" nahrádzajú slovami "článok 31 dohody o EHP"."Článok 2Texty nariadenia (ES) č. 1540/98 v islandskom a nórskom jazyku, ktoré sú pripojené k príslušným jazykovým verziám tohto rozhodnutia, sú autentické. Bude sa uplatňovať od 1. januára 1999.Článok 3Toto rozhodnutie nadobúda účinnosť 30. januára 1999 za predpokladu, že Spoločnému výboru EHP boli predložené všetky notifikácie podľa článku 103 ods. 1 dohody.Článok 4Toto rozhodnutie sa uverejní v časti EHP Úradného vestníka Európskych spoločenstiev a v dodatku EHP k uvedenému vestníku.V Bruseli 29. januára 1999Za Spoločný výbor EHPpredsedaF. Barbaso[1] Ú. v. ES L 272, 8.10.1998, s. 35.[2] Ú. v. ES L 202, 18.7.1998, s. 1.[3] Ú. v. ES C 205, 5.7.1997, s. 5.[4] Ú. v. ES L 316, 20.11.1997, s. 23."[5] Ú. v. ES C 368, 23.12.1994, s. 12.[6] Ú. v. ES C 38, 5.2.1998, s. 19."[7] Ú. v. ES C 74, 10.3.1998, s. 9.[8] Ú. v. ES L 111, 29.4.1999, s. 46."[9] Ú. v. ES C 45, 17.2.1996, s. 5.[10] Ú. v. ES L 245, 26.9.1996, s. 20."[11] Ú. v. ES C 72, 10.3.1994, s. 3.[12] Ú. v. ES L 231, 3.9.1994, s. 1."--------------------------------------------------


text:
 23.6.2012
 EL
 Επίσημη Εφημερίδα της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης
 C 184/22
 Προσφυγή της 11ης Ιανουαρίου 2012 — ΖΖ κατά Επιτροπής
 (Υπόθεση F-6/12)
 2012/C 184/46
 Γλώσσα διαδικασίας: η γαλλική
 Διάδικοι
 Προσφεύγων: ΖΖ (εκπρόσωπος: C. Dony, δικηγόρος)
 Καθής: Ευρωπαϊκή Επιτροπή
 Αντικείμενο και περιγραφή της διαφοράς
 Ακύρωση της αποφάσεως της Επιτροπής να μην κάνει δεκτή την ένσταση που άσκησε ο προσφεύγων κατά της αποφάσεως με την οποία απορρίφθηκε το αίτημά του για χορήγηση του επιδόματος εκπατρισμού
 Αιτήματα του προσφεύγοντος
 Ο προσφεύγων ζητεί από το Δικαστήριο Δημόσιας Διοίκησης:
 —
 να ακυρώσει την από 11 Οκτωβρίου 2011 απόφαση της ΑΔΑ να μην κάνει δεκτή την ένσταση που άσκησε ο προσφεύγων δυνάμει του άρθρου 90, παράγραφος 2, του ΚΥΚ, κατά της αποφάσεως της 24ης Μαΐου 2011 με την οποία απορρίφθηκε το αίτημά του για χορήγηση του επιδόματος εκπατρισμού·
 —
 να καταδικάσει την Ευρωπαϊκή Επιτροπή στα δικαστικά έξοδα.


text:
En fregat () var i ældre tid et fuldrigget hurtigsejlende orlogsskib, især anvendt som forpost-, depeche- eller konvojfartøj.
 De medførte fra 24 til 56 kanoner og havde kanoner i to lag – dvs. på to batteridæk (et åbent og et lukket). En korvet havde kun på ét dæk (åbent).
 Mest kendt i Danmark er nok Fregatten Jylland.
 I de moderne flåder bruges betegnelsen for orlogsskibe større end korvetter og mindre end destroyere. Typisk vil fregatter være 86-140 m lange, have tonnager på 1.300-3.000 tons og besætninger på 90-300 mand.
 Moderne fregatter opdeles i hurtige fregatter (>30 knob), eskortefregatter (25-27 knob) til antiubåds-krigsførelse og patruljefregatter til fredstidspatruljetjeneste. Ofte er fregatter udrustet med en helikopter.
 Se også
 skibstype
 Krigsskib
 Iver Huitfeldt-klassen
 Henvisninger/kilder
 Håndbog for danske Lokalhistorikere
 Rodholm, K: Scandinavian Navies/Nordiske flåder, 1995, Rodholm Publishing,
 The New Encyclopædia Britannica, 2003, Encyclopædia Britannica Inc.,
 Brockhaus Die Enzyklopädie, 1999, Brockhaus Leipzig-Mannheim,
 Skibstyper
 Krigsskibe


type: other

text:
Principper for opgørelse af afslag i købesummen for andelsbolig
 I en dom afsagt den 6. november 2014 (U2015.498H) tager Højesteret stilling til, hvordan et afslag for mangler ved individuelle forbedringer i en andelsbolig skal opgøres.
 Højesteret fastslår, at det som udgangspunkt må bero på almindelige køberetlige principper, om køberen af en andelsbolig har krav på et afslag i købesummen, hvis der efter købet viser sig mangler ved individuelle forbedringer af lejligheden.
 Højesteret udtaler, at der må tages udgangspunkt i, om kendskab til manglerne på handelstidspunktet ville have ført til en lavere købesum. Vurderingen sker under hensyn til størrelsen af udbedringsomkostningerne på handelstidspunktet samt manglernes beskaffenhed.
 Højesteret udtaler desuden, at afslaget skal foretages i den samlede købesum og det forhold, at købesummen skal specificeres på andel i foreningens formue og individuelle forbedringer, ændrer ikke herpå.
 Efter andelsboligforeningslovens maksimalprisregler skal der ved fastsættelse af maksimalprisen på en andelsbolig tages højde for mangler, som er kendte på handelstidspunktet, således at prisen for mangelfulde forbedringer nedsættes eller bortfalder (den nedsatte maksimalpris).
 Maksimalprisreglerne indebærer i almindelighed, at der handles til priser under markedsværdien.
 Højesteret udtaler, at hvis parterne uden kendskab til manglerne har handlet til maksimalprisen, er der en formodning for, at parterne med kendskab til manglerne ville have handlet til en nedsat maksimalpris.
 I nærværende sag havde køber erhvervet en andelsbolig til en maksimalpris på kr. 245.919,00 kr., hvoraf betaling for forbedringer i badeværelset på handelstidspunktet udgjorde kr. 35.920,00.
 Efter gennemførelse af syn og skøn blev det konstateret, at det badeværelse, som sælger havde fået etableret i andelsboligen, var mangelfuldt. Skønsmanden vurderede de samlede udbedringsomkostninger til 175.000,00 kr. inkl. moms. Skønsmanden vurderede, at ca. 27.000,00 kr. af udgifterne på 38.720,00 kr. til at etablere badeværelset i 1995 vedrørte arbejder, der ikke var udført håndværksmæssigt korrekt.
 Højesteret udtalte på den baggrund, at kun en del af forbedringsarbejderne vedrørende badeværelset var mangelfulde eller ville blive berørt at udbedringen. Højesteret fandt derfor, at maksimalprisen for andelsboligen med kendskab til manglerne skulle have været nedsat med kr. 27.000,00.
 Højesteret fandt, at køber ikke havde afkræftet formodningen for, at parterne med kendskab til manglerne ville have handlet til en således nedsat maksimalpris.
 Højesteret bemærkede afslutningsvis, at selvom parterne ikke havde handlet andelsboligen til maksimalprisen, men til en lavere markedsværdi, skulle afslaget ikke udmåles til et beløb svarende til de samlede udbedringsomkostninger, som anslået af skønsmanden.
 Højesteret opstiller i dommen nogle principper til brug for vurderingen af, hvordan afslag udmåles:
 der skal i almindelighed ses bort fra udgifter til udbedring af skader på bygningsbestanddele, som det påhviler tredjemand at vedligeholde,
 der skal tages hensyn til køberens nytte af forbedringen fra handelstidspunktet til udbedringen samt
 værdien af, at der ved udbedring sker udskiftning af gammelt med nyt.
 Hvis du vil læse hele dommen, kan du klikke her
 Spørgsmål vedrørende dommen og mangler ved andelsboliger generelt kan rettes til advokat Jeppe Brandorff Stefansen.


text:
§ 1 - Fredningstider:
 FISKEFÖRBUD 16/9 – 24/12 i samtliga örings-, rödings- och harrvatten.
 Utom i Harsasjön där fiske riktat efter gädda är tillåtet efter 16/9
 Gösfiske: fiskeförbud hela juni månad.
 Ljussjön, Storöratjärn och Edeforsen: fiskeförbud 16/3- 14/5 samt 16/9 – 24/12
 Stora Kölsjön och Åvattnet: Nätfiskeförbud mellan 1/10- 30/4
 Harsasjön, Bodasjön och Dalsjön: nätförbud hela året
 Kräftfiske: fiskeförbud råder under hela året.
 Kramstatjärn: är öppen för fiske året om.
 § 1b - Fredningsområden:
 Fiskeförbud råder i:
 Ljusvallsbäcken mellan Ljussjön och Grundvattnet.
 Gräningebäcken till Vinnfarvägen.
 Bäcken från Storöratjärn till Lillöratjärn.
 Gammelmyrbäcken (från Simessjön) och Abborrtjärnsbäcken råder fiskeförbud i de första 200 m i bäckarna.
 För övriga vatten, se lokalt anslagen information.
 § 2 - Minimimått:
 Öring och Röding 25 cm.
 § 3 - Fiske från Båt:
 Fiske från båt är förbjudet i följande vatten:
 Abborrtjärn, Gartsbotjärn, Högbergstjärn, Kramstatjärn, Långtjärn v. Kölvallberget, Mytingen, Oktjärn och Stormortjärn.
 I Ljussjön, Gräningen och Simessjön är fiske från båt tillåtet med särskilt båtkort. Ett kort per båt, EJ motor.
 ( Båtkorten kan endast lösas hos Owe Wiklund tel. 070-630 80 99)
 Flytring likställs med båt.
 Övriga vatten inom Fiskevårdsområdet upplåts till fiske från båt.
 § 4 - Fiske med nät:
 För fiske med nät krävs ett tilläggskort. Kan endast köpas av fiskerättsägare och fastboende eller fritidshusägare inom Järvsö FVO.
 Fiske med nät är tillåtet i Storsjön (Stora Kölsjön) och Åvattnet, fr. o m 1/5 t.o.m. 30/9.
 Nätförbud gäller i Ljusnan, inom en radie av 200 meter från mynningen av Milån och Sörbyån. Samt i Edeforsen från sockengränsen ner till gräns som markeras av skyltar. Nätförbud gäller även under hela året i Harsasjön och Bodasjön och Dalsjön.
 Fiske med nät får inte ske i bäckar och åar, inte heller så att en fiskådra eller fiskvägar avstängs till mer än 50 %.
 För fiske med nät gäller begränsning till 5 nät/kort med en sammanlagd längd av högst 150 meter.
 Näten skall vara märkta så att det tydligt framgår vem brukaren är.
 Nät räknas till de rörliga redskapen.
 § 5 - Kräftfiske:
 Allt kräftfiske är tillsvidare Förbjudet.
 § 6 Antalsbegränsningar:
 Inom Fiskevårdsområdet råder fångstbegränsning av öring, röding, harr och regnbåge till 3 st. / kort / dygn.
 § 7 Ryckfiske:
 Förbud mot ryckfiske gäller i samtliga vatten inom Järvsö Fvo.
 § 8 Handredskap:
 Med handredskap avses spö, pilk och liknande rörliga redskap som är utrustade med lina och högst 3 krokar.
 Fiske med handredskap är tillåtet i Järvsö Fiskevårdsområdesförenings samtliga vatten, förutom där totalt fiskeförbud råder.
 I följande vatten får dock endast fiske med ett (1) handredskap / person / kort bedrivas:
 Abborrtjärn, Gartsbotjärn, Grundvattnet, Gräningen, Högbergstjärn, Högvallstjärn, Kramstatjärn, Lillöratjärn, Ljussjön, Långtjärn (v, Kölvallsberget), Långtjärn (v Gräningen), Mytingen, Oktjärn, Simessjön, Sortvattnet ( se även § 12 ), Storöratjärn, Stormortjärn, Svarttjärnarna, Öratjärn (v Nor), Stor Öratjärn, Edeforsen i område som markeras med skyltar, Kyrkströmmen, bäckar och åar.
 § 9 - Fasta redskap:
 Tillåtet fast redskap är ryssja.
 Fiske med fasta redskap får ej bedrivas så att fiskeådra eller fiskvägar avstängs till mer än 50%.
 Fasta redskap skall vara märkta så att det tydligt framgår vem brukaren är.
 Fasta redskap får ej förekomma inom en radie av 200 meter från mynningen av Milån och Sörbyån.
 § 10 - Övriga rörliga redskap: (utom handredskap och nät)
 Med övriga rörliga redskap avses utterbräda, mjärde, långrev, angeldon, sax och ståndkrok.
 Övriga rörliga redskap får användas i samtliga vatten utom i de vatten som undantagits för fiske med endast ett (1) handredskap.
 Övriga rörliga redskap skall vara märkta så att de tydligt framgår vem brukaren är.
 Fiske med övriga rörliga redskap är förbjuden i en radie av 200 meter från mynningen av Milån och Sörbyån.
 § 11 - Fisketillsyn:
 Fisketillsyn sköts av tillsynspersoner förordnade av Länsstyrelsen.
 Fiskekort skall medföras vid fiske och vara försett med kvitto eller försäljningsställets stämpel/signatur samt innehavarens namn och giltighetstid.
 Fiskekortet är personligt och får ej överlåtas.
 Vid brott mot Fvo:s regler kommer en kontrollavgift enligt fastställd lista tas ut av fiskaren:
 Hög Stege
 §1 Fredningstider och fredningsområden x
 §2 Minimimått x
 §3 Vid fiske i vatten där båtförbud råder x
 §4 Nät, antalsbegränsning och märkning x
 Övrigt x
 §5 Kräftfiske x
 §6 Antalsbegränsning ädelfisk x
 §7 Ryckfiske x
 §8 Vid otillåtet antal handredskap x
 Vid otillåten fiskemetod x
 §9-10 Vid omärkta redskap x
 §11 Fiskekort x
 §12 Vid försäljning av laxartad fisk x
 Hög 3 000 kr
 Första 500 kr
 Andra 1 000 kr
 Tredje 1 500 kr
 §1 Fredningstider: Öring 15/9 – 25/12, Harr 1/4 – 31/5, Gös 1/6 – 30/6, Sik (fiske m. nät) 1/10-30/4
 Fredingsområden: Ljusvallbäcken, Storöratjärnsbäcken till Lillöratjärn, Gräningenbäcken till Vinfarsvägen, första 200m i Gammelmyrbäcken och Aborrtjärnsbäcken. Gäller också av styrelsen införda fiskeförbud.
 §2 Minimimått: Öring & Röding 25 cm, Harr 30 cm, Gös 40 cm, Kräfta 10 cm.
 §3 Båtförbudssjöar: Abborrtjärn, Gartsbotjärn, Högbergstjärn, Kramstatjärn, Långtjärn v Kölvallsberget ( utan båtkort:) Gräningen, Ljussjön och Simessjön.
 §4 Nät: Stege: max 5 nät totalt 150 Löpmeter märkta med brukarens namn och adress. Hög: Brott mot Förbudstid (Se §1). Förbudsområden 200 m. mynningen Mil- och Sörbyån. Vatten för endast ett handredskap (se §8), Harsasjön och Bodasjön. Fiskvägar får inte stängas till mer än 50%.
 §5 Kräftfiske: Allt kräftfiske utom av styrelsen anvisad tid och plats.
 §6 Antalsbegränsning: Max 3st/ kort och dygn.
 §7 Ryckfiske: Är aldrig tillåtet.
 §8 Vatten för ett handredskap: Stege: Fiske med fler än ett spö. Hög: Övriga fiskemetoder. Gäller i vatten för endast ett handredskap: Abborrtjärn, Gartsbotjärn, Grundvattnet, Gräningen, Högbergstjärn, Högvallstjärn, Kramstatjärn, Lillöratjärn, Ljussjön, 2 x Långtjärn, Mytingen, Oktjärn, Simessjön, Sortvattnet, Storöratjärn, Stormortjärn, Svarttjärnarna, Öratjärn Nor, Edeforsen, Kyrköströmmen, bäckar och åar.
 §9 Ryssja: Hög: Inom förbudsområden 200 m. radie mynning Milån och Sörbyån. Fiskväg avstängd till mer än 50 %. Vid fiske med annat fast redskap än ryssja.
 §10 Gäller Utterbräda, mjärde, långrev, angeldon, sax och ståndkrok. Hög: I vatten för endast ett handredskap. Inom förbudsområden 200m. radie mynning Milån och Sörbyån
 §11 Fiskekort: Vid fiske med ordinarie kort i extradagkortsvatten. Kort som är ofullständigt eller felaktigt ifyllt. När fiskaren har fiskekort men inte tagit med det till fiskevattnet.
 §12 Släpfiske och mäskning: Stege: Släpfiske i Extradagkortsvatten. Mäskning i vatten för ett handredskap.
 § 12 Övriga bestämmelser:
 ALL MÄRKT GÖS i Dalsjön ska återutsättas.
 Släpfiskeförbud råder i Gräningen, Simessjön och Ljussjön.
 Mäskning förbjuden i vatten som är upplåtna för fiske med endast ett handredskap ( Se § 8)
 Fiske av laxartad fisk får ej ske till försäljning.
 Decimeringsfiske i Sortvattnet: Angling riktat efter gädda är tillåtet för den som har löst ett decimeringsfiskekort
 Fiskeförbud: Styrelsen kan vid behov införa fiskeförbud utan årsmötesbeslut
 § 13 - Fiskeupplåtelse:
 Fisket upplåts i samtliga vatten utom Gräningen, Kramstatjärn, Simessjön, Sortvattnet och Ljussjön på följande korttyper:
 Fiskerättsinnehavarekort:Kan endast köpas direkt av ordförande eller kassör
 Tilläggskort för Nät:
 Kan endast köpas av fastboende och fritishusägare inom Järvsö FVO
 Gruppkort:
 Gruppfiskekort kan lösas enligt överenskommelse med ordföranden eller kassör.
 Fisket i Gräningen, Kramstatjärn, Simessjön, Sortvattnet och Ljussjön upplåts på följande korttyper:
 Båtkort:
 Gäller tillsammans med Dygnskort
 Flytringskort:
 Decimeringsfiskekort:
 Gäller endast i Sortvattnet för angling riktat efter gädda
 Vid FISKETÄVLINGAR ska tillstånd sökas hos styrelsen samt avgift betalas till Järvsö FVO


text:
 23.2.2006
 DA
 Den Europæiske Unions Tidende
 L 53/42
 AFGØRELSE TRUFFET AF DET BLANDEDE EØS-UDVALG
 Nr. 145/2005
 af 2. december 2005
 om ændring af bilag II (Tekniske forskrifter, standarder, prøvning og certificering) til EØS-aftalen
 DET BLANDEDE EØS-UDVALG HAR —
 under henvisning til aftalen om Det Europæiske Økonomiske Samarbejdsområde som ændret ved protokollen om tilpasning af aftalen om Det Europæiske Økonomiske Samarbejdsområde, i det følgende benævnt »aftalen«, særlig artikel 98, og
 ud fra følgende betragtninger:
 (1)
 Bilag II til aftalen blev ændret ved afgørelse truffet af Det Blandede EØS-udvalg nr. 79/2005 (1).
 (2)
 Europa-Parlamentets og Rådets direktiv 2005/20/EF af 9. marts 2005 om ændring af direktiv 94/62/EF om emballage og emballageaffald (2) bør indarbejdes i aftalen —
 TRUFFET FØLGENDE AFGØRELSE:
 Artikel 1
 Følgende led indsættes i punkt 7 (Europa-Parlamentets og Rådets direktiv 94/62/EF) i kapitel XVII i bilag II til aftalen:
 »—
 32005 L 0020: Europa-Parlamentets og Rådets direktiv 2005/20/EF af 9. marts 2005 (EUT L 70 af 16.3.2005, s. 17).«
 Artikel 2
 Den islandske og norske udgave af direktiv 2005/20/EF, der offentliggøres i Den Europæiske Unions Tidendes EØS-tillæg, er autentiske.
 Artikel 3
 Denne afgørelse træder i kraft den 3. december 2005, forudsat at Det Blandede EØS-udvalg har modtaget alle meddelelser i henhold til aftalens artikel 103, stk. 1 (3).
 Artikel 4
 Denne afgørelse offentliggøres i Den Europæiske Unions Tidendes EØS-afsnit og EØS-tillæg.
 Udfærdiget i Bruxelles, den 2. december 2005.
 På vegne af Det Blandede EØS-udvalg
 SD Prinz Nikolaus von LIECHTENSTEIN
 Formand
 (1) EUT L 268 af 13.10.2005, s. 10.
 (2) EUT L 70 af 16.3.2005, s. 17.
 (3) Ingen forfatningsmæssige krav angivet.


text:
Charlotte Reinagle Cooper (Ealing, 1870. szeptember 22. – Helensburgh, 1966. október 10.) brit olimpiai bajnok teniszezőnő. Az olimpiai játékok történetének első egyéni női olimpiai bajnoka. 2013-ban beválasztották az International Tennis Hall of Fame (Teniszhírességek Csarnoka) tagjai közé.
 Pályafutása
 Két aranyérmet szerzett a Párizsban rendezett, 1900. évi nyári olimpiai játékokon. Megnyerte az egyéni versenyt, miután a döntőben legyőzte a francia, Hélène Prévostet. A vegyes páros küzdelmeken Reginald Doherty társaként lett aranyérmes. Öt alkalommal nyerte meg a Wimbledoni teniszbajnokságot.
 Főbb sikerei
 Wimbledoni teniszbajnokság
 Bajnok: 1895, 1896, 1898, 1901, 1908
 Döntős: 1897, 1899, 1900, 1902, 1904
 Jegyzetek
 Források
 Ismertetője a incredible-people.com-on
 Brit teniszezők
 Brit olimpiai bajnokok
 Olimpiai bajnokok (1900)
 Olimpiai bajnokok (tenisz)
 1870-ben született személyek
 1966-ban elhunyt személyek
 Az International Tennis Hall of Fame tagjai
 Brit nők


type: legislation

jurisdiction: US

text:
 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
 Fish and Wildlife Service
 50 CFR Part 17
 [Docket No. FWS-R8-ES-2014-0023; 4500030113]
 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; 12-Month Finding on a Petition To List the Humboldt Marten as Endangered or Threatened
 AGENCY:
 Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
 ACTION:
 Notice of initiation of scoping and request for information.
 SUMMARY:
 We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), are gathering information to prepare a 12-month finding under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act), on a petition to list the current classification of Humboldt marten (Martes caurina humboldtensis) as an endangered or threatened species. We provide this notice to summarize the uncertainty regarding the subspecies taxonomic classification (based on current genetics information) and, therefore, our intent to conduct an evaluation of a potential distinct population segment (DPS) of martens in coastal northern California and coastal Oregon relative to the full species classification level. We will submit a 12-month finding on the petition to the Federal Register by April 1, 2015.
 DATES:
 We request that we receive information on or before August 7, 2014. Information submitted electronically using the Federal eRulemaking Portal (see ADDRESSES section, below) must be received by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on the closing date.
 ADDRESSES:
 You may submit information by one of the following methods:
 (1) Electronically: Go to the Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. In the Search box, enter FWS-R8-ES-2014-0023. You may submit information by clicking on “Comment Now!”
 (2) By hard copy: Submit by U.S. mail or hand delivery to: Public Comments Processing, Attn: FWS-R8-ES-2014-0023; Division of Policy and Directives Management; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; 4401 N. Fairfax Drive, MS 2042-PDM; Arlington, VA 22203.
 We request that you send information only by the methods described above. We will post all information we receive on http://www.regulations.gov. This generally means that we will post any personal information you provide us (see the Information Requested section below for more information).
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
 Bruce Bingham, Field Supervisor, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Arcata Fish and Wildlife Office, 1655 Heindon Road, Arcata, CA 95521; telephone 707-822-7201; or facsimile 707-822-8411. Persons who use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 800-877-8339.
 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
 Background
 In a petition dated September 28, 2010 (Center for Biological Diversity (CBD) and Environmental Protection Information Center (EPIC) 2010), the petitioners requested that we consider for listing the (then-classified) subspecies Humboldt marten (Martes americana humboldtensis), or the (now-recognized) subspecies Humboldt marten (M. caurina humboldtensis), or the Humboldt marten Distinct Population Segment (DPS) of the Pacific marten (M. caurina). The petitioners further stipulated that, based on recent genetic analyses indicating that populations of marten from coastal Oregon are more closely related to M. a. humboldtensis than to M. a. caurina in the Cascades of Oregon (citing Dawson 2008, Slauson et al. 2009), the range of the subspecies or DPS of the Humboldt marten should be expanded to include coastal Oregon populations. On January 12, 2012, we published a substantial 90-day finding on the petition to list the Humboldt marten as an endangered or threatened species under the Act (77 FR 1900). For purposes of the 90-day finding, the common name Humboldt marten referred to the then-classified American marten (M. americana) populations in coastal northern California and coastal Oregon.
 The American marten (Martes americana) was originally described as a single species by Turton (1806; entire), based on specimens from eastern North America. In 1890, Merriam (1890; entire) considered a new species, M. caurina, as those martens found west of the Rocky Mountains. In 1926, the Humboldt [Pine] marten (M. c. humboldtensis) was described as a subspecies of M. caurina (Grinnel and Dixon 1926, entire); historically, this subspecies was distributed throughout the coastal, fog-influenced coniferous forests of northern California from northwestern Sonoma County north to the Oregon border (Grinnel and Dixon 1926, entire). In 1953, Wright (1953; entire) described one species, the American marten (M. americana), which included as subspecies both the Humboldt [Pine] marten subspecies (M. a. humboldtensis), and the former western marten species (M. caurina), classified as M. a. caurina.
 As noted above, at the time of our 90-day finding (77 FR 1900; January 12, 2012), the Humboldt marten was classified as Martes americana humboldtensis. Subsequently, Dawson and Cook (2012, entire) split the American marten, recognizing the Pacific marten (M. caurina) for all martens occurring west of the Rocky Mountain crest, based on genetic and morphological differences. While this split changed the species-level name of all martens occurring west of the Rocky Mountain crest from M. americana to M. caurina, subspecies epithets were not changed. Therefore, the current classification of the Humboldt marten in coastal northern California is M. c. humboldtensis, and the marten populations occurring in adjacent coastal Oregon are M. c. caurina. In addition, as currently recognized, populations of martens in the Oregon Cascades northward through the State of Washington and into British Columbia, Canada, are also M. c. caurina.
 Ongoing genetic research indicates uncertainty in the Pacific marten subspecies delineations in California and Oregon. Specifically, the best available data indicate that the Martes caurina humboldtensis population in coastal northern California (Humboldt, Siskiyou, and Del Norte Counties) and the two M. c. caurina populations in coastal Oregon (Curry, Coos, coastal portion of Douglas, coastal portion of Lane, Lincoln, and Tillamook Counties) may be a single evolutionary unit (clade) (Slauson et al. 2009, p. 1,340; Schwartz et al., in prep) (available for review at http://www.regulations.gov, Docket No. FWS-R8-ES-2014-0023). Although questions regarding the taxonomy of marten subspecies in northern California and Oregon are not new (i.e., both the petition we received (CBD and EPIC 2010) and our 90-day finding (January 12, 2012; 77 FR 1900) identified ongoing genetic research and taxonomic uncertainty), the best available information indicates that the original designation of two separate marten subspecies occurring in coastal northern California and coastal Oregon may be invalid. However, there is currently insufficient information to conclude with reasonable certainty that coastal Oregon populations of Pacific marten should be classified as M. c. humboldtensis. Such a conclusion is confounded by small sample sizes and lack of corroborating information (e.g., similar morphological or physiological traits among the two clades) that would lend further support to a conclusion that these two groups should be considered the same subspecies.
 According to section 3(16) of the Act, we may consider for listing any of three categories of vertebrate animals: A species, subspecies, or distinct population segment (DPS; see the Service's 1996 Policy Regarding the Recognition of Distinct Vertebrate Population Segments under the Endangered Species Act at 61 FR 4722). We refer to each of these categories as a potential “listable entity.” We have been petitioned to list collectively two groups of the Pacific marten (two populations in Oregon and one in California) that are currently recognized as belonging to two separate subspecies (as described above). To ensure we are evaluating the most accurate listable entity based on the best scientific and commercial data currently available (including unpublished genetics information), and to ensure we are being fully responsive to the petition (CBD and EPIC 2010), we consider it reasonable that a coastal distinct population segment (DPS) of the Pacific marten constitute the listable entity for our 12-month status review. As such, we consider this DPS to include the currently recognized Martes caurina humboldtensis (i.e., Humboldt marten) and the coastal populations of M. caurina caurina in Oregon (i.e., Oregon Coast Range group). We believe this entity is reasonable for consideration at this time given:
 (1) The best available data (e.g., new genetics information, similar habitat usage) suggest that the coastal northern California marten population and the coastal Oregon marten populations may be a single evolutionary entity as opposed to two separate entities.
 (2) Existing genetics information suggests that subspecies-level taxonomy of M. c. humboldtensis, M. c. caurina, and possibly other subspecies of the Pacific marten as currently classified may be inaccurate.
 (3) The DPS policy states that the population segment under consideration must be evaluated for discreteness and significance in relation to the remainder of the taxon to which it belongs. Ordinarily, in the present case we would evaluate the marten populations relative to the subspecies to which they belong, but the populations in question currently represent two separate subspecies and there is uncertainty as to the legitimacy of those subspecies classifications, rendering such an evaluation invalid.
 (4) Uncertainty in the subspecies-level taxonomy of Pacific marten logically necessitates that we elevate our evaluation of the DPS relative to the Pacific marten at the full species-level. In other words, we would apply the criteria for evaluating a coastal DPS of the Pacific marten relative to the full species Pacific marten (Martes caurina) as a whole.
 (5) The DPS policy states that “In all cases, the organisms in a population are members of a single species or lesser taxon.” Therefore, given (1) through (4) above, we think that an evaluation at the species level is appropriate.
 Under the DPS policy, two basic elements are considered in the decision regarding the establishment of a population of a vertebrate species as a possible DPS. The question as to whether a population or group of populations qualifies as a DPS requires a finding that the population is both: (1) Discrete in relation to the remainder of the taxon to which it belongs, and (2) biologically and ecologically significant to the taxon to which it belongs. If the population meets the first two criteria under the DPS policy, we then proceed to the third element in the process, which is to evaluate the population segment's conservation status in relation to the Act's standards for listing as an endangered or threatened species.
 Under the DPS policy, a population segment of a vertebrate taxon may be considered discrete if it satisfies either one of the following conditions:
 (1) It is markedly separated from other populations of the same taxon as a consequence of physical, physiological, ecological, or behavioral factors. Quantitative measures of genetic or morphological discontinuity may provide evidence of this separation.
 (2) It is delimited by international governmental boundaries within which differences in control of exploitation, management of habitat, conservation status, or regulatory mechanisms exist that are significant in light of section 4(a)(1)(D) of the Act. As the marten populations in question here do not transcend an international boundary, this criterion does not apply.
 If we determine that a vertebrate population segment is discrete under one or more of the conditions described in our DPS policy, then we consider its biological and ecological significance to the larger taxon to which it belongs. Because precise circumstances are likely to vary considerably from case to case, the DPS policy does not describe all the classes of information that might be used in determining the biological and ecological importance of a discrete population. However, the DPS policy describes four possible classes of information that provide evidence of a population segment's biological and ecological importance to the taxon to which it belongs. This consideration of the population segment's significance may include, but is not limited to, the following:
 (1) Persistence of the discrete population segment in an ecological setting unusual or unique to the taxon;
 (2) Evidence that loss of the discrete population segment would result in a significant gap in the range of a taxon;
 (3) Evidence that the discrete population segment represents the only surviving natural occurrence of a taxon that may be more abundant elsewhere as an introduced population outside its historical range; or
 (4) Evidence that the discrete population segment differs markedly from other populations of the species in its genetic characteristics.
 A population segment needs to satisfy only one of these conditions to be considered significant. Furthermore, other information may be used as appropriate to provide evidence for significance.
 As indicated above, we anticipate concluding an evaluation of the coastal DPS of Pacific marten and submitting a 12-month finding to the Federal Register by April 1, 2015. We appreciate any information regarding our consideration of the coastal northern California and coastal Oregon populations of Pacific marten as a single listable entity (see Information Requested).
 Information Requested
 We will accept written information during this 45-day scoping period on our future 12-month finding evaluation of the putative coastal DPS of Pacific marten. We will consider information from all interested parties. We intend that any final action resulting from our evaluation be as accurate as possible and based on the best available scientific and commercial data.
 We are interested in the following information for Pacific martens, specifically Humboldt martens in coastal northern California and coastal Oregon populations of Pacific marten:
 (1) Habitat requirements for feeding, breeding, and sheltering.
 (2) Genetics and taxonomy, especially:
 (a) Information (e.g., morphological, genetic, physiological, ecological, behavioral) supporting or contesting current subspecies taxonomy of Martes caurina in coastal northern California and Oregon.
 (b) Information supporting or contesting the validity of the historical geographic boundaries of the Pacific marten subspecies, Martes caurina caurina.
 (3) Information to inform a DPS designation, especially:
 (a) Information supporting or contesting the combining of the population of Pacific martens in northwest California with the coastal Oregon populations as a single listable entity under our DPS policy.
 (b) Information to inform our evaluation as to whether martens in coastal northern California and coastal Oregon do or do not meet the criteria for discreteness and significance under our DPS policy.
 (4) The factors that are the basis for making a listing determination for a species, subspecies, or DPS under section 4(a) of the Act (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), which are:
 (a) The present or threatened destruction, modification, or curtailment of its habitat or range;
 (b) Overutilization for commercial, recreational, scientific, or educational purposes;
 (c) Disease or predation;
 (d) The inadequacy of existing regulatory mechanisms; or
 (e) Other natural or manmade factors affecting its continued existence.
 (5) Exposure to toxicants, including anticoagulant rodenticides, including information related to:
 (a) Scope of exposure within coastal northern California and coastal Oregon;
 (b) Severity of exposure to individuals; and
 (c) Potential impacts of exposure to populations.
 (6) Historical and current range of the Pacific marten in coastal northern California and coastal Oregon, including distribution patterns.
 (7) Historical and current population levels of the Pacific marten in coastal northern California and coastal Oregon, and current and projected trends.
 (8) Past and ongoing conservation measures for the Pacific marten in coastal northern California and coastal Oregon, or its habitat.
 (9) Effects of climate change on habitat of the Pacific marten, including changes in fire frequency and intensity.
 (10) Whether our suggested approach to evaluating the presently recognized subspecies Humboldt marten (M. c. humboldtensis) collectively with the Oregon coastal populations of the Pacific marten (a subset of M. c. caurina) as a potential single DPS of the full species Martes caurina is supported by the best available scientific and commercial data.
 If you submitted comments or information on the 90-day finding (77 FR 1900) during the initial comment period from January 12, 2012, to March 12, 2013, please do not resubmit them. We will incorporate them into the public record and we will fully consider them in the preparation of our 12-month finding. Our 12-month finding will take into consideration all written comments and any additional information we receive during the previous comment period and this scoping period. If you submit information during this scoping period, please include sufficient information with your submission (such as scientific journal articles or other publications) to allow us to verify any scientific or commercial information you include. You may submit your information by one of the methods listed in ADDRESSES. We request that you send information only by the methods described in ADDRESSES.
 If you submit information via http://www.regulations.gov, your entire submission—including any personal identifying information—will be posted on the Web site. We will post all hardcopy information received on http://www.regulations.gov as well. If you submit hardcopy information that includes personal identifying information, you may request at the top of your document that we withhold this information from public review. However, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so.
 Information we receive, as well as supporting documentation we use in preparing our 12-month finding, will be available via Docket No. FWS-R8-ES-2014-0023 upon publication of our 12-month finding in the Federal Register.
 References Cited
 A complete list of references cited is available on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov and upon request from the Arcata Fish and Wildlife Field Office (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT).
 Author
 The primary authors of this notice are the staff members of the Pacific Southwest Regional Office and Arcata Fish and Wildlife Field Office.
 Authority
 The authority for this action is the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
 Dated: June 12, 2014
 Stephen Guertin,
 Acting Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
 [FR Doc. 2014-14513 Filed 6-20-14; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4310-55-P


text:
 12.8.2006
 LT
 Europos Sąjungos oficialusis leidinys
 C 190/29
 2006 m. birželio 27 d. pareikštas ieškinys byloje Inalca ir Cremonini prieš Komisiją
 (Byla T-174/06)
 (2006/C 190/54)
 Proceso kalba: italų
 Šalys
 Ieškovės: Inalca ir Cremonini (Modena, Italija), atstovaujamos advokato Francesco Sciaudone
 Atsakovė: Europos Bendrijų Komisija
 Ieškovių reikalavimai
 —
 Pripažinti Komisijos deliktinę atsakomybę.
 —
 Pripažinti, kad ieškovės patyrė 2 861 000 eurų nuostolių.
 —
 Nurodyti Komisijai atlyginti nuostolius ir sumokėti kompensaciją bei galimus delspinigius.
 —
 Priteisti iš atsakovės bylinėjimosi išlaidas.
 Ieškinio pagrindai ir pagrindiniai argumentai
 Šiuo ieškiniu ieškovės siekia, kad būtų atlyginti jų patirti nuostoliai dėl 1998 m. liepos 6 d. laiško, kuriuo Sukčiavimo prevencijos koordinavimo padalinys (SPKP) pateikė Italijos valdžios institucijoms savo išvadas dėl šio padalinio atlikto numanomų pažeidimų eksportuojant jautieną į Jordaniją su grąžinamąja išmoka tyrimo, kurias ieškovės laiko visiškai klaidingomis, ir kuriame jis suformulavo baudžiamojo pobūdžio kaltinimus dviem bendrovėms ir jų vadovams.
 Grįsdamos savo reikalavimus ieškovės nurodo:
 —
 Reglamento (EEB) Nr. 729/70 9 straipsnio 2 dalies antrosios ir ketvirtosios pastraipų pažeidimą, nes pirmiausia SPKP atlikti inspektavimai Jordanijoje yra ginčytini, kadangi SPKP viršijo savo kompetenciją, taikytiną tik valstybių narių teritorijoje, ir antra, SPKP nevykdė savo pareigos parengti ir atlikti inspektavimus ir patikrinimus tik iš anksto gavus valstybių narių sutikimą ir dalyvaujant visiems suinteresuotiems nacionalinės valdžios atstovams;
 —
 Reglamento (EB) Nr. 2988/95 9 straipsnio 2 dalies antrosios pastraipos ir Reglamento (EB) Nr. 2185/96 4 straipsnio pažeidimą, nes SPKP nesilaikė savo pareigos parengti patikrinimus ir inspektavimus glaudžiai bendradarbiaujant su valstybėmis narėmis bei informuoti nacionalines valdžios institucijas prieš atlikdamas patikrinimus;
 —
 Reglamento (EEB) Nr. 3665/87 18 straipsnio pažeidimą, nes SPKP neatsižvelgė į šiuo reglamentu pripažintą ir priskirtą įrodomąją galią aiškiai išvardytiems dokumentams ir savavališkai atsižvelgė į kitus dokumentus, taip pažeisdamas teisinio saugumo ir inspektavimų skaidrumo principus.
 Ieškovės taip pat nurodo gero administravimo, rūpestingumo ir proporcingumo principų pažeidimus bei profesinės paslapties atskleidimą.
 Galiausiai ieškovės tvirtina, kad net jei SPKP elgesys negalėtų būti ginčijamas, šis padalinys bet kuriuo atveju būtų atsakingas už ieškovėms padarytą žalą. Jos iš tikrųjų negalėjo pagrįstai numatyti, o taip pat ir išvengti žalos, kuri atsirado dėl tyrimo, kuris, jų nuomone, buvo visiškai klaidingas.


text:
 20.4.2015
 BG
 Официален вестник на Европейския съюз
 C 127/40
 Жалба, подадена на 2 февруари 2015 г. — ZZ/Комисия
 (Дело F-17/15)
 (2015/C 127/56)
 Език на производството: английски
 Страни
 Жалбоподател: ZZ (представител: D. Fouquet, avocat)
 Ответник: Европейска комисия
 Предмет на производството
 Отмяна на решението на органа по назначаването да не променя годишния доклад на жалбоподателя за 2013 г.
 Искания на жалбоподателя
 —
 да се отмени решението на органа по назначаването от 31.10.2014 г. (HR.D.2/AS/ac/Ares82014) в отговор на жалбата по административен ред, подадена от ZZ (No R/781/14);
 —
 да бъде задължен ответникът да приеме ново решение по случая, като спази установеното от Съда на публичната служба, и по-конкретно да заличи оспореното изречение от доклада на жалбоподателя;
 —
 да се осъди ответника да заплати съдебните разноски.


text:
 I
 111th CONGRESS
 2d Session
 H. R. 5915
 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 July 28, 2010
 Mr. Rooney (for
 himself, Mr. Paul,
 Ms. Ros-Lehtinen, and
 Mr. Lincoln Diaz-Balart of Florida)
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the
 Committee on Ways and
 Means
 A BILL
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to create
 Catastrophe Savings Accounts.
 1.Short titleThis Act may be cited as the
 Catastrophe Savings Accounts Act of
 2010.
 2.Catastrophe
 Savings Accounts
 (a)In
 generalSubchapter F of chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code of
 1986 (relating to exempt organizations) is amended by adding at the end the
 following new part:
 IXCatastrophe
 Savings Accounts
 530A.Catastrophe
 Savings Accounts
 (a)General
 ruleA Catastrophe Savings Account shall be exempt from taxation
 under this subtitle. Notwithstanding the preceding sentence, such account shall
 be subject to the taxes imposed by section 511 (relating to imposition of tax
 on unrelated business income of charitable organizations).
 (b)Catastrophe
 Savings AccountFor purposes of this section, the term
 Catastrophe Savings Account means a trust created or organized in
 the United States for the exclusive benefit of an individual or his
 beneficiaries and which is designated (in such manner as the Secretary shall
 prescribe) at the time of the establishment of the trust as a Catastrophe
 Savings Account, but only if the written governing instrument creating the
 trust meets the following requirements:
 (1)Except in the case
 of a qualified rollover contribution—
 (A)no contribution
 will be accepted unless it is in cash, and
 (B)contributions will
 not be accepted in excess of the account balance limit specified in subsection
 (c).
 (2)The trustee is a
 bank (as defined in section 408(n)) or another person who demonstrates to the
 satisfaction of the Secretary that the manner in which that person will
 administer the trust will be consistent with the requirements of this
 section.
 (3)The interest of an
 individual in the balance of his account is nonforfeitable.
 (4)The assets of the
 trust shall not be commingled with other property except in a common trust fund
 or common investment fund.
 (c)Account balance
 limitThe aggregate account
 balance for all Catastrophe Savings Accounts maintained for the benefit of an
 individual (including qualified rollover contributions) shall not
 exceed—
 (1)in the case of an
 individual whose qualified deductible is not more than $1,000, $2,000,
 and
 (2)in the case of an
 individual whose qualified deductible is more than $1,000, the amount equal to
 the lesser of—
 (A)$15,000, or
 (B)twice the amount of the individual’s
 qualified deductible.
 (d)DefinitionsFor
 purposes of this section—
 (1)Qualified
 catastrophe expensesThe term qualified catastrophe
 expenses means expenses paid or incurred by reason of a major disaster
 that has been declared by the President under section 401 of the Robert T.
 Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act.
 (2)Qualified
 deductibleWith respect to an individual, the term
 qualified deductible means the annual deductible for the
 individual’s homeowners’ insurance policy.
 (3)Qualified
 rollover contributionThe term qualified rollover
 contribution means a contribution to a Catastrophe Savings
 Account—
 (A)from another such
 account of the same beneficiary, but only if such amount is contributed not
 later than the 60th day after the distribution from such other account,
 and
 (B)from a Catastrophe
 Savings Account of a spouse of the beneficiary of the account to which the
 contribution is made, but only if such amount is contributed not later than the
 60th day after the distribution from such other account.
 (e)Tax treatment of
 distributions
 (1)In
 generalAny distribution from
 a Catastrophe Savings Account shall be includible in the gross income of the
 distributee in the manner as provided in section 72.
 (2)Distributions
 for qualified catastrophe expenses
 (A)In
 generalNo amount shall be
 includible in gross income under paragraph (1) if the qualified catastrophe
 expenses of the distributee during the taxable year are not less than the
 aggregate distributions during the taxable year.
 (B)Distributions in
 excess of expensesIf such
 aggregate distributions exceed such expenses during the taxable year, the
 amount otherwise includible in gross income under paragraph (1) shall be
 reduced by the amount which bears the same ratio to the amount which would be
 includible in gross income under paragraph (1) (without regard to this
 subparagraph) as the qualified catastrophe expenses bear to such aggregate
 distributions.
 (3)Additional tax
 for distributions not used for qualified catastrophe expensesThe
 tax imposed by this chapter for any taxable year on any taxpayer who receives a
 payment or distribution from a Catastrophe Savings Account which is includible
 in gross income shall be increased by 10 percent of the amount which is so
 includible.
 (4)Retirement
 distributionsNo amount shall be includible in gross income under
 paragraph (1) (or subject to an additional tax under paragraph (3)) if the
 payment or distribution is made on or after the date on which the distributee
 attains age 62.
 (f)Tax treatment of
 accountsRules similar to the
 rules of paragraphs (2) and (4) of section 408(e) shall apply to any
 Catastrophe Savings
 Account.
 .
 (b)Tax on excess
 contributions
 (1)In
 generalSubsection (a) of section 4973 of the Internal Revenue
 Code of 1986 (relating to tax on excess contributions to certain tax-favored
 accounts and annuities) is amended by striking or at the end of
 paragraph (4), by inserting or at the end of paragraph (5), and
 by inserting after paragraph (5) the following new paragraph:
 (6)a Catastrophe
 Savings Account (as defined in section
 530A),
 .
 (2)Excess
 contributionSection 4973 of such Code is amended by adding at
 the end the following new subsection:
 (h)Excess
 contributions to Catastrophe Savings AccountsFor purposes of
 this section, in the case of Catastrophe Savings Accounts (within the meaning
 of section 530A), the term excess contributions means the amount
 by which the aggregate account balance for all Catastrophe Savings Accounts
 maintained for the benefit of an individual exceeds the account balance limit
 defined in section
 530A(c)(1).
 .
 (c)Conforming
 amendmentThe table of parts for subchapter F of chapter 1 of the
 Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the following new
 item:
 Part IX. Catastrophe Savings
 Accounts
 .
 (d)Effective
 dateThe amendments made by this section shall apply to taxable
 years beginning after December 31, 2010.


text:
Rockland is a village in eastern La Crosse County, Wisconsin, United States, along the La Crosse River. It is part of the La Crosse, Wisconsin Metropolitan Statistical Area. The population was 594 at the 2010 census.
 History
 A post office called Rockland has been in operation since 1873. The village was named for the rocky land surrounding it, which includes the large rock in the village.
 Geography
 Rockland is located at (43.906115, -90.918369).
 According to the United States Census Bureau, the village has a total area of , all of it land.
 Demographics
 2010 census
 As of the census of 2010, there were 594 people, 228 households, and 157 families residing in the village. The population density was . There were 243 housing units at an average density of . The racial makeup of the village was 93.9% White, 2.0% African American, 0.5% Native American, 2.7% Asian, 0.2% from other races, and 0.7% from two or more races. Hispanic or Latino of any race were 0.7% of the population.
 There were 228 households, of which 36.0% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 57.0% were married couples living together, 7.9% had a female householder with no husband present, 3.9% had a male householder with no wife present, and 31.1% were non-families. 22.8% of all households were made up of individuals, and 9.7% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.61 and the average family size was 3.13.
 The median age in the village was 37 years. 25.8% of residents were under the age of 18; 8.1% were between the ages of 18 and 24; 27.9% were from 25 to 44; 28.7% were from 45 to 64; and 9.4% were 65 years of age or older. The gender makeup of the village was 55.1% male and 44.9% female.
 2000 census
 As of the census of 2000, there were 628 people, 213 households, and 166 families residing in Rockland. The population density was 1,156.4 people per square mile (449.0/km2). There were 216 housing units at an average density of 397.7 per square mile (154.4/km2). The racial makeup of Rockland was 98.41% White, 0.16% African American, 0.16% Native American, 0.48% Asian, and 0.80% from two or more races. Hispanic or Latino of any race were 0.16% of the population.
 There were 213 households, out of which 41.3% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 66.2% were married couples living together, 7.5% had a female householder with no husband present, and 21.6% were non-families. 18.8% of all households were made up of individuals, and 8.0% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.82 and the average family size was 3.20.
 In Rockland the population was spread out, with 29.3% under the age of 18, 6.7% from 18 to 24, 32.5% from 25 to 44, 22.1% from 45 to 64, and 9.4% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 34 years. For every 100 females, there were 115.1 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 123.1 males.
 The median income for a household in Rockland was $46,429, and the median income for a family was $50,714. Males had a median income of $31,563 versus $20,357 for females. The per capita income for Rockland was $17,914. About 6.7% of families and 8.6% of the population were below the poverty line, including 15.6% of those under age 18 and none of those age 65 or over.
 References
 External links
 Villages in La Crosse County, Wisconsin
 Villages in Wisconsin


text:
 15.3.2012
 EL
 Επίσημη Εφημερίδα της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης
 L 76/23
 ΑΠΌΦΑΣΗ ΤΗΣ ΜΕΙΚΤΉΣ ΕΠΙΤΡΟΠΉΣ ΤΟΥ ΕΟΧ
 αριθ. 139/2011
 της 2ας Δεκεμβρίου 2011
 για την τροποποίηση του παραρτήματος XIII (Μεταφορές) της συμφωνίας για τον ΕΟΧ
 Η ΜΕΙΚΤΗ ΕΠΙΤΡΟΠΗ ΤΟΥ ΕΟΧ,
 Έχοντας υπόψη τη συμφωνία για τον Ευρωπαϊκό Οικονομικό Χώρο, όπως τροποποιήθηκε με το πρωτόκολλο προσαρμογής της εν λόγω συμφωνίας, εφεξής καλούμενη «συμφωνία», και ιδίως το άρθρο 98,
 Εκτιμώντας τα ακόλουθα:
 (1)
 Το παράρτημα XIII της συμφωνίας τροποποιήθηκε με την απόφαση αριθ. 120/2011 της Μεικτής Επιτροπής του ΕΟΧ της 21ης Οκτωβρίου 2011 (1).
 (2)
 Η απόφαση 2011/26/ΕΕ της Επιτροπής, της 14ης Ιανουαρίου 2011, με την οποία επιτρέπεται στα κράτη μέλη να εκδώσουν ορισμένες παρεκκλίσεις σύμφωνα με την οδηγία 2008/68/ΕΚ του Ευρωπαϊκού Κοινοβουλίου και του Συμβουλίου σχετικά με τις εσωτερικές μεταφορές επικίνδυνων εμπορευμάτων (2), πρέπει να ενσωματωθεί στη συμφωνία,
 ΕΞΕΔΩΣΕ ΤΗΝ ΠΑΡΟΥΣΑ ΑΠΟΦΑΣΗ:
 Άρθρο 1
 Στο σημείο 13γ (οδηγία 2008/68/ΕΚ του Ευρωπαϊκού Κοινοβουλίου και του Συμβουλίου) του παραρτήματος XIII της συμφωνίας προστίθεται η ακόλουθη περίπτωση:
 «—
 32011 D 0026: απόφαση 2011/26/ΕΕ της Επιτροπής της 14ης Ιανουαρίου 2011 (ΕΕ L 13 της 18.1.2011, σ. 64).».
 Άρθρο 2
 Τα κείμενα της απόφασης 2011/26/ΕΕ στην ισλανδική και στη νορβηγική γλώσσα, τα οποία δημοσιεύονται στο συμπλήρωμα ΕΟΧ της Επίσημης Εφημερίδας της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης, είναι αυθεντικά.
 Άρθρο 3
 Η παρούσα απόφαση αρχίζει να ισχύει στις 3 Δεκεμβρίου 2011, υπό την προϋπόθεση ότι έχουν πραγματοποιηθεί προς τη Μεικτή Επιτροπή του ΕΟΧ όλες οι κοινοποιήσεις που προβλέπονται στο άρθρο 103 παράγραφος 1 της συμφωνίας (3).
 Άρθρο 4
 Η παρούσα απόφαση δημοσιεύεται στο τμήμα ΕΟΧ και στο συμπλήρωμα ΕΟΧ της Επίσημης Εφημερίδας της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης.
 Βρυξέλλες, 2 Δεκεμβρίου 2011.
 Για τη Μεικτή Επιτροπή του ΕΟΧ
 Ο Πρόεδρος
 Kurt JÄGER
 (1) ΕΕ L 341 της 22.12.2011, σ. 85.
 (2) ΕΕ L 13 της 18.1.2011, σ. 64.
 (3) Δεν έχουν αναφερθεί συνταγματικές απαιτήσεις.


text:
 22.10.2014
 RO
 Jurnalul Oficial al Uniunii Europene
 L 302/26
 REGULAMENTUL DE PUNERE ÎN APLICARE (UE) NR. 1113/2014 AL COMISIEI
 din 16 octombrie 2014
 de stabilire a formei și a detaliilor tehnice pentru notificarea menționată la articolele 3 și 5 din Regulamentul (UE) nr. 256/2014 al Parlamentului European și al Consiliului și de abrogare a Regulamentelor (CE) nr. 2386/96 și (UE, Euratom) nr. 833/2010 ale Comisiei
 COMISIA EUROPEANĂ,
 având în vedere Tratatul privind funcționarea Uniunii Europene,
 Având în vedere Regulamentul (UE) nr. 256/2014 al Parlamentului European și al Consiliului din 26 februarie 2014 privind notificarea către Comisie a proiectelor de investiții în infrastructura energetică din Uniunea Europeană, de înlocuire a Regulamentului (UE, Euratom) nr. 617/2010 al Consiliului și de abrogare a Regulamentului (CE) nr. 736/96 al Consiliului (1), în special articolul 7,
 întrucât:
 (1)
 Pentru a colecta date comparabile și pentru a simplifica raportarea de către statele membre ori de către entitățile sau organismele delegate ale acestora menționate la articolul 3 din Regulamentul (UE) nr. 256/2014, notificările ce urmează să fie făcute ar trebui standardizate prin utilizarea unor tabele de raportare. Prin urmare, ar trebui adoptate dispozițiile referitoare la formă și la alte detalii tehnice pentru notificarea datelor.
 (2)
 În urma abrogării Regulamentului (CE) nr. 736/96 al Consiliului (2) prin Regulamentul (UE) nr. 256/2014, Regulamentul (CE) nr. 2386/96 al Comisiei (3) ar trebui de asemenea abrogat.
 (3)
 În urma anulării Regulamentului (UE, Euratom) nr. 617/2010 al Consiliului (4) de către Curtea Europeană de Justiție (5), Regulamentul (UE, Euratom) nr. 833/2010 al Comisiei (6) ar trebui de asemenea abrogat prin prezentul regulament,
 ADOPTĂ PREZENTUL REGULAMENT:
 Articolul 1
 Forma și detaliile tehnice ale notificării către Comisie a datelor și informațiilor referitoare la proiectele de investiții în infrastructura energetică, menționate la articolele 3 și 5 din Regulamentul (UE) nr. 256/2014 al Consiliului sunt stabilite în anexa la prezentul regulament.
 Articolul 2
 Regulamentele (CE) nr. 2386/96 și (UE, Euratom) nr. 833/2010 se abrogă.
 Articolul 3
 Statele membre asigură coerența informațiilor statistice raportate pe baza modelului din anexă și a informațiilor statistice raportate în temeiul Regulamentului (CE) nr. 1099/2008 privind statisticile în domeniul energiei
 Articolul 4
 Prezentul regulament intră în vigoare în a douăzecea zi de la data publicării în Jurnalul Oficial al Uniunii Europene.
 Prezentul regulament este obligatoriu în toate elementele sale și se aplică direct în statele membre în conformitate cu tratatele.
 Adoptat la Bruxelles, 16 octombrie 2014.
 Pentru Comisie
 Președintele
 José Manuel BARROSO
 (1) JO L 84, 20.3.2014, p. 61.
 (2) Regulamentul (CE) nr. 736/96 al Consiliului din 22 aprilie 1996 privind notificarea proiectelor de investiții care prezintă interes pentru Comunitate în sectoarele petrolului, gazelor naturale și electricității la Comisie (JO L 102, 25.4.1996, p. 1).
 (3) Regulamentul (CE) nr. 2386/96 al Comisiei din 16 decembrie 1996 de aplicare a Regulamentului (CE) nr. 736/96 al Consiliului privind notificarea proiectelor de investiții care prezintă interes pentru Comunitate în sectoarele petrolului, gazelor naturale și electricității la Comisie (JO L 326, 25.4.1996, p. 13).
 (4) Regulamentul (UE, Euratom) nr. 617/2010 al Consiliului din 24 iunie 2010 privind informarea Comisiei cu privire la proiectele de investiții în infrastructura energetică din cadrul Uniunii Europene și de abrogare a Regulamentului (CE) nr. 736/96 (JO L 180, 15.7.2010, p. 7).
 (5) Hotărârea Curții de Justiție din 6 septembrie 2012 în cauza C-490/10, Parlamentul/Consiliul, Rec., 2012, p. I-0000.
 (6) Regulamentul (UE, Euratom) nr. 833/2010 al Comisiei din 21 septembrie 2010 de implementare a Regulamentului (UE, Euratom) nr. 617/2010 al Consiliului privind informarea Comisiei cu privire la proiectele de investiții în infrastructura energetică din cadrul Uniunii Europene (JO L 248, 22.9.2010, p. 36).
 ANEXĂ