text:
Mene...Kotiin3DHDAbstraktianimaatioEläimetlinnutPyörätautotSarjakuvatJulkkiksetVärikäsSöpöviileäKukkaPelitTytötteKuumaElääLogoRakkausElokuvatluontopaikatavaruusUrheiluMaailmanmobileLisää Kotiin / Sarjakuvat / Gintama tapetti HD Gintama tapetti HD
 2,263 näkymät
 0 Gintama tapetti HD
 Here is a best collection Of gintama wallpaper HD For Desktops, Kannettavat, Mobiles Ja Tabletit. täälläDownloadWallpaper.org saat lakhs ilmaisia taustakuvia laitteelle. Kaikki kuvat ovat aikajärjestyksessä, suosio, värejä ja näytön koon ja ar alati päivitetty. valitsevat vapaa taustakuvia yli kahdestakymmenestä luokista sekä Eläimet, Sarjakuva, Flower ja Urheilu. vaikka tyyppi tietokoneen että yksinkertaisesti omistat, voit yksinkertaisesti siirtää korkean resoluution taustakuvan kokoa muutetaan ja rajataan sopivaksi työpöydälle näytön. 1.
 Yksinkertaisuuden, valitse Desktopin Koko (esim. 1366×768, 1920×1080, 1024×768 jne.) luettelosta päätöksiä oikeassa paneelissa, ja myös järjestelmä voi valita sinulle kaikkea järjestelmän hyväksyttävän Size Set. Ja muistaa, täällä voit siirtää kasoista ilmaiseksi taustakuvia! If you Like This gintama wallpaper HD Collection Give us a Like And Share On Facebook.
 piipittää Tietoja Jeya Edellinen: desert tapetti HD
 seuraava: olut tapetti HD
 anime vampire wallpapertaustakuvaksi puhelimet HDkaikki näkevä silmä tapetti HDgirly taustakuvia iphonespyro tapettiraven tapetti HDtapetti 1680×1050 HDSöpö tapetti iPhone HDKnicks tapettisniper tapetti Mainos


type: wikipedia

text:
Pelkinis pelėnas arba vandeninis pelėnas (Microtus oeconomus) – vidutinio dydžio žiurkėninių (Cricetidae) šeimos graužikas. Kūnas 100-180 mm ilgio (apie 4 cm uodega), 40-55 g. svorio. Kailiukas beveik juodas, rudo atspalvio. Pilvas šiek tiek šviesesnis. Ausys trumpos. Uodegos apačia šviesesnė už viršutinę pusę. Uodega truputį ilgesnė negu kitų pelėnų, jos ilgis sudaro beveik pusę kūno ilgio.
 Gyvena šiaurės Europoje ir Azijoje, šiaurės vakarų Amerikoje, įskaitant Aliaską, daugiausia tundroje arba drėgnose pievose, netoli vandens. Minta žolėmis, sėklomis. Aktyvūs visus metus.
 Lietuvoje retesnis už kitus pelėnus. Aptinkamas drėgnose pievose, pelkių pakraščiuose, prie vandens telkinių, kur vešli augmenija (pvz., Dubysos regioninio parko pievos, Žuvinto biosferos rezervatas). Urvus kasa drėgnose vietose, kupstuose. Urvo anga plati, prie jos būna išmesta žemių krūvelė.
 Žiurkėniniai


type: caselaw

jurisdiction: EU

text:
 30.12.2006
 PT
 Jornal Oficial da União Europeia
 C 326/60
 Recurso interposto em 6 de Novembro de 2006 — UniCredito Italiano/IHMI — Union Investment Privatfonds GmbH
 (Processo T-303/06)
 (2006/C 326/130)
 Língua em que o recurso foi interposto: italiano
 Partes
 Recorrente: UniCredito Italiano S.p.A. (Génova, Itália) (representantes: G. Floridia e R. Floridia, advogados)
 Recorrido: Instituto de Harmonização do Mercado Interno (marcas, desenhos e modelos)
 Outra parte no processo na Câmara de Recurso: Union Investment Privatfonds GmbH
 Pedidos da recorrente
 —
 Anulação da decisão da Segunda Câmara de Recurso do IHMI, de 5 de Setembro de 2006, adoptada nos processos apensos R 196/2005-2 e R 211/2005-2, relativos ao processo de oposição n.o B490971 referente ao pedido de marca comunitária n.o 2.236.164.
 —
 Condenação do IHMI na totalidade das despesas.
 Fundamentos e principais argumentos
 Requerente da marca comunitária: UniCredito Italiano S.p.A.
 Marca comunitária em causa: marca nominativa «UNIWEB» (pedido de registo n.o 2.236.164) para serviços das classes 35, 36 e 42.
 Titular da marca ou sinal invocado no processo de oposição: Union Investment Privatfonds GmbH, anteriormente Union Investment Gesellschaft GmbH
 Marca ou sinal invocado em apoio da oposição: marcas nominativas alemãs «UNIFONDS» (n.o 991.995) e «UNIRAK» (n.o 991.997) e marca figurativa alemã «UNIZINS» (n.o 2.016.954) para identificar o investimento de fundos na acepção da classe 36
 Decisão da Divisão de Oposição: deferimento parcial da oposição na parte em que reconhece um risco de confusão «apenas relativamente aos serviços considerados semelhantes»
 Decisão da Câmara de Recurso: negado provimento ao recurso
 Fundamentos invocados: a decisão impugnada aplicou erradamente a teoria da protecção alargada das marcas ditas de série, desenvolvida pelo Tribunal de Primeira Instância no acórdão que proferiu em 23 de Fevereiro de 2006 no processo T-194/03, Bainbridge, porque os dois requisitos necessários para esse efeito não estão preenchidos: a) é necessário que o elemento comum da série das marcas anteriores seja distintivo; e b) é necessário que as marcas anteriores sejam utilizadas e apreendidas pelo público de referência como significativas de uma multiplicidade de produtos e/ou de serviços.


text:
Henri Moisan, francoski kemik in farmakolog, * 28. september 1852, Pariz, Francija, † 20. februar 1907, Pariz.
 Življenje in delo
 Deloval je v več raziskovalnih laboratorijih v Franciji in končno na pariški Sorboni.
 Prvi je odkril nevaren kemijski element fluor leta 1886. Konstruiral je električno obločno peč in v njej proučeval reakcije pri velikih temperaturah. Ta peč se imenuje po njem. Njegova odkritja in druga dela so bila uporabljena tudi v industriji. Odkril je postopek izdelave kalcijevega karbida iz apna in oglja. Uspešno se je lotil tudi izdelave umetnih diamantov.
 Leta 1906 je prejel Nobelovo nagrado za kemijo.
 Sklici
 Francoski kemiki
 Francoski akademiki
 Farmakologi
 Predavatelji na Humboldtovi univerzi v Berlinu
 Odkritelji kemičnih elementov
 Nobelovi nagrajenci za kemijo
 Prejemniki Davyjeve medalje
 Ljudje, po katerih so poimenovali krater na Luni
 Ljudje, po katerih so poimenovali mineral
 Tuji člani Kraljeve družbe
 Francoski univerzitetni učitelji
 Člani Madžarske akademije znanosti
 Fluor


type: contracts

text:
20.6.2013 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 168/3
 AGREEMENT
 between the European Union and the Republic of Moldova amending the Agreement between the
 European Community and the Republic of Moldova on the facilitation of the issuance of visas
 THE EUROPEAN UNION,
 and
 THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA,
 hereinafter referred to as ‘the Parties’,
 HAVING REGARD to the Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Moldova on the facilitation
 of the issuance of visas which entered into force on 1 January 2008,
 DESIRING to further facilitate people-to-people contacts,
 RECOGNISING the importance of the introduction of a visa-free travel regime for the citizens of the Republic of Moldova
 in due course, provided that the conditions for well-managed and secure mobility are in place,
 TAKING INTO ACCOUNT the Protocol on the Schengen acquis integrated into the framework of the European Union and
 the Protocol on the position of the United Kingdom and Ireland in respect of the area of freedom, security and justice,
 annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and confirming
 that the provisions of this Agreement do not apply to the United Kingdom and Ireland,
 TAKING INTO ACCOUNT the Protocol on the position of Denmark annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to
 the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and confirming that the provisions of this Agreement do not apply
 to Denmark,
 HAVE AGREED AS FOLLOWS:
 Article 1 (b) Point (f) shall be replaced by the following:
 The Agreement between the European Community and the
 Republic of Moldova on the facilitation of the issuance of
 ‘(f) for journalists and the technical crew accom
 visas, hereinafter referred to as the ‘Agreement’, shall be
 panying them in a professional capacity:
 amended in accordance with the provisions of this Article:
 (1) In the title, the word ‘Community’ shall be replaced by the — certificate or other document issued by a
 word ‘Union’. professional organisation or the applicant’s
 employer proving that the person concerned
 is a qualified journalist and stating that the
 (2) In Article 2(1) and (2) and in Article 3 point (e), the word purpose of the journey is to carry out jour
 ‘Community’ shall be replaced by the words ‘European nalistic work or proving that the person is a
 Union’. member of the technical crew accompanying
 the journalist in a professional capacity;’;
 (3) Article 4 paragraph 1 shall be amended as follows:
 (c) Point (k) shall be replaced by the following:
 (a) Point (d) shall be replaced by the following:
 ‘(k) for close relatives – spouse, children (including
 adopted children), parents (including custodians),
 ‘(d) for drivers conducting international cargo and grandparents and grandchildren – visiting citizens
 passenger transportation services to the territories of the Republic of Moldova legally residing in the
 of the Member States in vehicles registered in the territory of the Member States, or citizens of the
 Republic of Moldova: European Union residing in the territory of the
 Member State of which they are nationals:
 — a written request from the national association
 of carriers of the Republic of Moldova — a written request from the host person;’;
 providing for international road transpor
 tation, stating the purpose, itinerary, duration
 and frequency of the trips;’; (d) The following point shall be added:
 ---pagebreak--- L 168/4 EN Official Journal of the European Union 20.6.2013
 ‘(p) for participants in official European Union cross- — in the case of the persons referred to in point (d), the
 border cooperation programmes, such as under term of validity of the status as a representative of the
 the European Neighbourhood and Partnership business organisation or the work contract, or
 Instrument (ENPI):
 — in the case of the persons referred to in point (e), the
 — a written request by the host organisation.’. work contract
 (4) In Article 5, paragraphs 1 to 3 shall be replaced by the
 is less than five years.
 following:
 ‘1. Diplomatic missions and consular posts of the 2. Diplomatic missions and consular posts of the
 Member States shall issue multiple-entry visas with a Member States shall issue multiple-entry visas with a
 term of validity of five years to the following categories term of validity of one year to the following categories
 of persons: of persons, provided that during the previous year they
 have obtained at least one visa, have made use of it in
 accordance with the laws on entry and stay of the visited
 (a) members of national and regional Governments and State:
 Parliaments, of the Constitutional Court and Supreme
 Court if they are not exempted from the visa
 requirement by this Agreement, in the exercise of (a) members of official delegations who, following an
 their duties; official invitation addressed to the Republic of
 Moldova, are to participate regularly in meetings,
 consultations, negotiations or exchange programs, as
 (b) permanent members of official delegations who,
 well as in events held in the territory of the Member
 following an official invitation addressed to the
 States by intergovernmental organisations;
 Republic of Moldova, are to participate regularly in
 meetings, consultations, negotiations or exchange
 programs, as well as in events held in the territory (b) representatives of civil society organisations travelling
 of the Member States by intergovernmental organi regularly to Member States for the purposes of
 sations; educational training, seminars or conferences,
 including in the framework of exchange programmes;
 (c) spouses and children (including adopted children), who
 are under the age of 21 or are dependent, and parents
 (c) members of the professions participating in inter
 (including custodians) visiting citizens of the Republic
 national exhibitions, conferences, symposia, seminars
 of Moldova legally residing in the territory of the
 or other similar events who regularly travel to the
 Member States or citizens of the European Union
 Member States;
 residing in the territory of the Member State of
 which they are nationals;
 (d) drivers conducting international cargo and passenger
 (d) business people and representatives of business organi transportation services to the territories of the
 sations who regularly travel to the Member States; Member States in vehicles registered in the Republic
 of Moldova;
 (e) journalists and the technical crew accompanying them
 in a professional capacity. (e) members of train, refrigerator and locomotive crews in
 international trains travelling to the territories of the
 Member States;
 By way of derogation from the first subparagraph, where
 the need or the intention to travel frequently or regularly
 is manifestly limited to a shorter period, the term of (f) persons participating in scientific, cultural and artistic
 validity of the multiple-entry visa shall be limited to that activities, including university and other exchange
 period, in particular where programs, who regularly travel to the Member States;
 — in the case of the persons referred to in point (a), the
 (g) students and post-graduate students who regularly
 term of office,
 travel for the purposes of study or educational
 training, including in the framework of exchange
 — in the case of the persons referred to in point (b), the programmes;
 term of the validity of the status as a permanent
 member of an official delegation,
 (h) participants in international sports events and persons
 accompanying them in a professional capacity;
 — in the case of the persons referred to in point (c), the
 period of validity of the authorisation for legal
 residence of citizens of the Republic of Moldova (i) participants in official exchange programmes organised
 legally residing in the European Union, by twin cities or other localities;
 ---pagebreak--- 20.6.2013 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 168/5
 (j) participants in official European Union cross-border under the European Neighbourhood and Part
 cooperation programmes, such as under the nership Instrument (ENPI).’;
 European Neighbourhood and Partnership Instrument
 (ENPI).
 (v) the following subparagraph shall be added:
 By way of derogation from the first subparagraph, where
 the need or the intention to travel frequently or regularly ‘The first subparagraph shall apply also where the
 is manifestly limited to a shorter period, the term of purpose of the journey is transit.’;
 validity of the multiple-entry visa shall be limited to that
 period.
 (b) The following paragraph shall be added:
 3. Diplomatic missions and consular posts of the
 Member States shall issue multiple-entry visas with a ‘4. If a Member State cooperates with an external
 term of validity of a minimum of two years and a service provider in view of issuing a visa the external
 maximum of five years to the categories of persons service provider may charge a service fee. This fee shall
 referred to in paragraph 2, provided that during the be proportionate to the costs incurred by the external
 previous two years they have made use of the one year service provider while performing its tasks and shall
 multiple-entry visas in accordance with the laws on entry not exceed EUR 30. The Member States shall maintain
 and stay of the visited State unless the need or the the possibility for all applicants to lodge their appli
 intention to travel frequently or regularly is manifestly cations directly at their consulates. The external service
 limited to a shorter period, in which case the term of provider shall conduct its operations in accordance
 validity of the multiple-entry visa shall be limited to that with the Visa Code and in full respect of Moldovan
 period.’. legislation.’.
 (5) Article 6 shall be amended as follows:
 (6) The following Article shall be inserted:
 (a) In paragraph 2,
 ‘Article 6a
 (i) the introductory words shall be replaced by the Lodging of an application without the presence of the
 following: applicant
 Member States consulates may waive the requirement to
 ‘2. Without prejudice to paragraph 4 fees for appear in person, when the applicant is known to them
 processing the visa application are waived for for his integrity and reliability, unless the applicant is
 the following categories of persons:’; required to appear in person for the collection of
 biometric identifiers.’.
 (ii) in point (a), the following words shall be added:
 (7) Article 8 shall be replaced by the following:
 ‘or citizens of the European Union residing in the
 territory of the Member State of which they are
 ‘Article 8
 nationals’;
 Departure in the case of lost or stolen documents
 (iii) in point (j), the following words shall be added: Citizens of the European Union and citizens of the
 Republic of Moldova who have lost their identity docu
 ‘and the technical crew accompanying them in a ments, or from whom those documents have been stolen
 professional capacity’; while staying in the territory of the Republic of Moldova
 or of the Member States, may leave the territory of the
 Republic of Moldova or of the Member States on the basis
 (iv) the following points shall be added: of valid identity documents entitling them to cross the
 border issued by diplomatic missions or consular posts
 ‘(p) participants aged 25 years or less in seminars, of the Member States or of the Republic of Moldova
 conferences, sports, cultural or educational without any visa or other authorisation.’.
 events, organised by non profit organisations;
 (8) Article 10 shall be amended as follows:
 (q) representatives of civil society organisations
 undertaking trips for purposes of educational
 training, seminars, conferences, including in (a) The title shall be replaced by the following:
 the framework of exchange programmes;
 ‘Diplomatic and service passports’;
 (r) participants in official European Union cross-
 border cooperation programmes, such as (b) Paragraph 2 shall be replaced by the following:
 ---pagebreak--- L 168/6 EN Official Journal of the European Union 20.6.2013
 ‘2. Citizens of the Republic of Moldova, holders of ‘2. The provisions of bilateral Agreements or
 valid biometric service passports can enter, leave and arrangements between individual Member States and
 transit through the territories of the Member States the Republic of Moldova concluded before the entry
 without visas.’; into force of this Agreement providing for the
 exemption of the holders of non-biometric service
 passports from the visa requirement shall continue to
 (c) The following paragraph shall be added: apply without prejudice to the right of the Member
 States concerned or the Republic of Moldova to
 ‘3. Persons mentioned in paragraphs 1 and 2 may denounce or suspend these bilateral agreements or
 stay in the territories of the Member States for a period arrangements.’.
 not exceeding 90 days per period of 180 days.’.
 (11) In Article 14, the following first paragraph shall be
 inserted:
 (9) Article 12(1) shall be amended as follows:
 ‘The Republic of Moldova may only reintroduce the visa
 (a) In the first sentence, the word ‘Community’ shall be requirement for citizens or certain categories of citizens of
 replaced by the word ‘Union’; all Member States and not for citizens or certain categories
 of citizens of individual Member States.’.
 (b) In the second sentence, the word ‘Community’ shall be
 replaced by the words ‘European Union’ and the words Article 2
 ‘Commission of the European Communities’ by the This Agreement shall be ratified or approved by the Parties in
 words ‘European Commission’. accordance with their respective procedures and shall enter into
 force on the first day of the second month following the date
 (10) Article 13 shall be amended as follows: on which the last Party notifies the other that the procedures
 referred to above have been completed.
 (a) The existing paragraph shall be numbered as
 paragraph 1;
 Done at Brussels on the twenty-seventh day of June in the year
 two thousand and twelve, in duplicate in the official languages
 (b) The following paragraph shall be added: of the Parties, each of these texts being equally authentic.
 ---pagebreak--- 20.6.2013 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 168/7
 За Европейския съюз
 Por la Unión Europea
 Za Evropskou unii
 For Den Europæiske Union
 Für die Europäische Union
 Euroopa Liidu nimel
 Για την Ευρωπαϊκή Ένωση
 For the European Union
 Pour l'Union européenne
 Per l'Unione europea
 Eiropas Savienības vārdā –
 Europos Sąjungos vardu
 Az Európai Unió részéről
 Għall-Unjoni Ewropea
 Voor de Europese Unie
 W imieniu Unii Europejskiej
 Pela União Europeia
 Pentru Uniunea Europeană
 Za Európsku úniu
 Za Evropsko unijo
 Euroopan unionin puolesta
 För Europeiska unionen
 Pentru Uniunea Europeană
 3a Република Молдова
 Por la República de Moldavia
 Za Moldavskou republiku
 For Republikken Moldova
 Für die Republik Moldau
 Moldova Vabariigi nimel
 Για τη Δημοκρατία της Μολδαβίας
 For the Republic of Moldova
 Pour la République de Moldavie
 Per la Repubblica moldova
 Moldovas Republikas vārdā –
 Moldovos Respublikos vardu
 A Moldovai Köztársaság részéről
 Għar-Repubblika tal-Moldova
 Voor de Republiek Moldavië
 W imieniu Republiki Mołdawii
 Pela República da Moldova
 Pentru Republica Moldova
 Za Moldavskú republiku
 Za Republiko Moldavijo
 Moldovan tasavallan puolesta
 För Republiken Moldavien
 Pentru Republica Moldova
 ---pagebreak--- L 168/8 EN Official Journal of the European Union 20.6.2013
 JOINT DECLARATION ON COOPERATION ON TRAVEL DOCUMENTS
 The Parties agree that the Joint Committee established pursuant to Article 12 of the Agreement, when
 monitoring the implementation of the Agreement, should evaluate the impact of the level of security of the
 respective travel documents on the functioning of the Agreement. To that end, the Parties agree to regularly
 inform each other about the measures taken for avoiding the proliferation of travel documents, developing
 the technical aspects of travel document security as well as regarding the personalisation process of the
 issuance of travel documents.
 EUROPEAN UNION DECLARATION ON DOCUMENTS TO BE SUBMITTED WHEN APPLYING FOR
 SHORT-STAY VISAS
 The European Union will establish a harmonised list of supporting documents, in accordance with Article 48
 paragraph 1 lit. a of the Visa Code, in order to ensure that applicants from the Republic of Moldova are
 required to submit, in principle, the same supporting documents. The European Union will inform the
 Republic of Moldova in the Committee, when such a list has been established. The European Union will also
 inform the citizens of the Republic of Moldova in accordance with Article 47 paragraph 1 lit. a of the Visa
 Code.
 EUROPEAN UNION DECLARATION ON COOPERATION WITH EXTERNAL SERVICE PROVIDERS
 The European Union commits itself to outsource the reception of visa applications only as a last resort,
 when there are particular circumstances or reasons relating to the local situation, such as where the high
 number of applicants does not allow the collection of applications and of data to be organised in a timely
 manner and in decent conditions; or it is not possible to ensure a good territorial coverage of the third
 country concerned in any other way; and where other forms of cooperation prove not to be appropriate for
 the Member State concerned.
 ---pagebreak--- 20.6.2013 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 168/9
 EUROPEAN UNION DECLARATION ON FACILITATIONS FOR FAMILY MEMBERS
 The European Union takes note of the suggestion of the Republic of Moldova to give a wider definition to
 the notion of family members that should benefit from visa facilitation as well as of the importance that the
 Republic of Moldova attaches to the simplification of movement of this category of persons.
 In order to ease the mobility of an extended number of persons which have family links (in particular sisters
 and brothers and their children) with citizens of the Republic of Moldova legally residing in the territories of
 Member States or with citizens of the European Union residing in the territory of the Member State of
 which they are nationals, the European Union invites the Member States’ consular offices to make full use of
 the existing possibilities in the Visa Code for facilitating the issuance of visas to this category of persons,
 including in particular, the simplification of documentary evidence requested for the applicants, exemptions
 from handling fees and, where appropriate, the issuing of multiple-entry visas.
 JOINT DECLARATION CONCERNING SWITZERLAND AND LIECHTENSTEIN
 The Parties take note of the close relationship between the Union and Switzerland and Liechtenstein,
 particularly by virtue of the Agreement of 26 October 2004 concerning the association of these
 countries with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis.
 In such circumstances, it is desirable that the authorities of Switzerland and Liechtenstein and the Republic
 of Moldova conclude, without delay, bilateral agreements on the facilitation of the issuance of short-stay
 visas in similar terms as the amended Agreement.


text:
Guarda este un oraș în Districtul Guarda, Portugalia.
 Zidurile, turnurile, vechiul cartier evreiesc și casele lui Dom João I și ale lui Barbadão, amintesc de zilele glorioase ale acestui oraș. Catedrala (Sé), de tip gotic la origini, înfătișează privirii o imensă poarta și geamuri în stil manuelin și renascentist. De asemenea, merită vizitate bisericile Senhora dos Remédios (secolul al XVI-lea), Igreja da Misericórdia (secolul al XVII-lea) și São Vicente (secolul al XVIII-lea), precum și Muzeul Regional.
 Vezi și
 Listă de orașe din Portugalia
 Orașe din Portugalia


text:
C 234/2 EL Epiärglg Eugleqiäda sxm Etqxpaøjxäm Joimosgäsxm 25.7.98
 APOUARG SOT DIJARSGQIOT 3. So Gmxleämo Bariä keio sgy Lecókgy Bqesamiä ay jai
 (eäjso slgäla) Boäqeiay Iqkamdiäay ueäqei sa dijarsijó sot eänoda.
 sgy 7gy Laðot 1998
 (1) EE C 158 sgy 1.6.1996.
 rsgm tpoäherg C-124/96: Episqopgä sxm Etqxpaøjxäm Joi-
 mosgäsxm jasó Barikeiäot sgy Irpamiäay tporsgqifoleämot
 apoä so Gmxleämo Bariäkeio sgy Lecókgy Bqesamiäay jai
 Boäqeiay Iqkamdiäay (1)
 (Paqóbarg jqósoty leäkoty Ç èjsg odgciäa 77/388/EOJ
 sot Rtlbotkiäot Ç Apakkacgä oqirleämxm paqovxäm tpgqe-
 rixäm rtmdeoleämxm rsemó le som ahkgsirloä gä sg rxlasijgä APOUARG SOT DIJARSGQIOT
 acxcgä Ç Lg dijaiokocgleämoi peqioqirloiä)
 (peälpso slgäla)
 (98/C 234/02)
 sgy 7gy Laðot 1998
 (Ckxärra diadijariäay: g irpamijgä) rsgm tpoäherg C-401/96 P: Somaco SARL jasó Episqopgäy
 sxm Etqxpaøjxäm Joimosgäsxm (1)
 (Pqorxqimgä lesóuqargç g oqirsijgä lesóuqarg ha dglo- (Amaiäqerg Ç Amsacxmirloäy Ç èkkeiwg hiäcotray som
 rietheiä rsg ÛRtkkocgä sgy Molokociä ay sot Dijarsgqiäotë) amsacxmirloä rtlpeqiuoqóy rsg Laqsimiäja koäcx auoqgäsxm
 pieärexm ej leäqoty sxm sopijxäm dioijgsijxäm aqvxäm Ç
 Akkoiäxrg sxm apodeijsijxäm rsoiveiäxm)
 Rsgm tpoäherg C-124/96, Episqopgä sxm Etqxpaøjxäm Joi-
 (98/C 234/03)
 mosgäsxm (ejpqoärxpoi: Enrico Traversa jai Francisco Enrique
 GonzaÂlez Díaz) jasó Barikeiäot sgy Irpamiäay (ejpqoärxpoy:
 Luis PeÂrez de Ayala Becerril), tporsgqifoleämot apoä so
 Gmxleämo Bariäkeio sgy Lecókgy Bqesamiäay jai Boäqeiay (Ckxärra diadijariäay: g cakkijgä)
 Iqkamdiäay (ejpqoärxpoi: Lindsey Nicoll, epijotqotälemg apoä
 sg Sarah Moore), le amsijeiälemo ma amacmxqirheiä oäsi so
 Bariäkeio sgy Irpamiäay, oqiäfomsay oäsi g apakkacgä apoä som
 uoäqo pqorsiheleämgy aniäay oärom auoqó siy paqoveäy pot (Pqorxqimgä lesóuqargç g oqirsijgä lesóuqarg ha dglo-
 rtmdeäomsai rsemó le som ahkgsirloä gä sg rxlasijgä acxcgä rietheiä rsg ÛRtkkocgä sgy Molokociäay sot Dijarsgqiäotë)
 irvtäei loämom cia soty idixsijotäy uoqeiäy sxm opoiäxm sa seäkg
 eiroädot gä oi peqiodijeäy rtmdqoleäy dem tpeqbaiämotm eäma
 rtcjejqileämo poroä, paqeäbg siy diasóneiy sot óqhqot 13
 rgleiäo A paqócqauoy 1 rsoiveiäo ic) sgy eäjsgy odgciäay 77/ Rsgm tpoäherg C-401/96 P, Somaco SARL, le eädqa so Fort-
 388/EOJ sot Rtlbotkiäot, sgy 17gy Laðot 1977, peqiä emaq- de-France (Cakkiäa), ejpqorxpotälemg apoä som Jean-Claude
 lomiärexy sxm moloherixäm sxm jqasxäm lekxäm, sxm rvesijxäm Fourgoux, dijgcoäqo Paqiriotä, le amsiäjkgso rso Kotnel-
 le soty uoäqoty jtäjkot eqcarixäm Ç Joimoä rtärsgla uoäqot botäqco som dijgcoäqo Pierrot Schiltz, 4, rue BeÂatrix de Bour-
 pqorsiheleämgy aniäay: oloioäloqug uoqokocijgä bórg (EE eid. bon, le amsijeiälemo aiäsgrg amaiqeärexy jasó sgy apouórexy
 eäjd. 09/001, r. 49), so Dijarsgäqio (eäjso slgäla), rtcjeiälemo pot eneädxre rsiy 18 Repselbqiäot 1996 so Pqxsodijeiäo sxm
 apoä soty H. Ragnemalm, pqoäedqo slgälasoy, G. F. Mancini, Etqxpaøjxäm Joimosgäsxm (seäsaqso pemsalekeäy slgäla) rsgm
 P. J. G. Kapteyn (eirgcgsgä), J. L. Murray jai J. L. Ixómmot, tpoäherg S-387/94, Asia Motor France j.kp. jasó Episqopgäy,
 dijarseäy, cemijoäy eiraccekeäay: A. La Pergola, cqallaseäay: (Rtkkocgä 1996, r. II r-961), le sgm opoiäa fgseiäsai g amaiäqerg
 R. Grass, eneädxre rsiy 7 Laðot 1998 apoäuarg le so ajoä- sgy apouórexy atsgäy, oäpot o eäseqoy diódijoy eiämai g Epi-
 kotho diasajsijoä: sqopgä sxm Etqxpaøjxäm Joimosgäsxm, (ejpqoärxpoy: Berend
 Jan Drijber, epijotqotälemoy apoä som HerveÂ Lehman), so
 Dijarsgäqio (peälpso slgäla), rtcjeiälemo apoä soty C. Gul-
 1. So Bariäkeio sgy Irpamiä ay, oqiä fomsay oäsi g apakkacgä mann (eirgcgsgä), pqoäedqo slgälasoy, M. Wathelet, D. A. O.
 apoä som uoäqo pqorsiheleämgy aniäay oärom auoqó siy Edward, P. Jann jai L. Sevón, dijarseäy, cemijoäy eiraccekeäay:
 paqoveäy pot rtmdeäomsai rsemó le som ahkgsirloä gä sg G. Tesauro, cqallaseäay: R. Grass, eneädxre rsiy 7 Laðot
 rxlasijgä acxcgä irvtäei loämo cia soty idixsijotäy uoqeiäy, 1998 apoäuarg le so ajoäkotho diasajsijoä:
 sxm opoiäxm sa seäkg eiroädot gä oi peqiodijeäy rtmdqoleäy
 dem tpeqbaiämotm eäma rtcjejqileämo poroä, paqeäbg siy
 tpovqexäreiy pot tpeävei apoä so óqhqo 13 rgleiäo A 1. Apoqqiäpsei sgm aiä sgrg amaiqeärexy.
 paqócqauoy 1 rsoiveiä o ic) sgy eäjsgy odgciäay 77/388/
 EOJ sot Rtlbotkiäot, sgy 17gy Laðot 1977, peqiä emaq-
 lomiärexy sxm moloherixäm sxm jqasxäm lekxäm, sxm rve-
 sijxäm le soty uoäqoty jtäjkot eqcarixäm Ç Joimoä 2. Jasadijófei sg Somaco SARL rsa dijarsijó eänoda.
 rtärsgla uoäqot pqorsiheleämgy aniäay: oloioäloqug uoqo-
 kocijgä bórg. (1) EE C 54 sgy 22.2.1997.
 2. Jasadijófei so Bariäkeio sgy Irpamiä ay rsa dijarsijó
 eänoda.


type: other

text:
Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali tal-Unjoni Ewropea, C 194, 2 ta' Lulju 2011
 doi:10.3000/17255198.C_2011.194.mlt
 2 ta' Lulju 2011
 L-Aħħar Pubblikazzjoni tal-Qorti tal-Ġustizzja tal-Unjoni Ewropea f'Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali tal-Unjoni EwropeaĠU C 186, 25.6.2011
 Kawża C-147/08: Sentenza tal-Qorti tal-Ġustizzja (Awla Manja) tal-10 ta’ Mejju 2011 (talba għal deċiżjoni preliminari tal-Arbeitsgericht Hamburg — il-Ġermanja) — Jürgen Römer vs Freie und Hansestadt Hamburg (Trattament ugwali fl-impjieg u fix-xogħol — Prinċipji ġenerali tad-dritt tal-Unjoni — Artikolu 157 TFUE — Direttiva 2000/78/KE — Kamp ta’ applikazzjoni — Kunċett ta’ “remunerazzjoni” — Esklużjonijiet — Skema ta’ sigurtà soċjali professjonali taħt forma ta’ pensjoni tal-irtirar kumplimentari għall-ex impjegati ta’ kollettività lokali u s-superstiti tagħhom — Metodu ta’ kalkolu ta’ din il-pensjoni li jagħti vantaġġ lill-benefiċjarji miżżewġa meta mqabbla ma’ dawk li jgħixu fil-kuntest ta’ unjoni tul il-ħajja rreġistrata — Diskriminazzjoni bbażata fuq l-orjentazzjoni sesswali)
 Kawżi magħquda C-230/09 u C-231/09: Sentenza tal-Qorti tal-Ġustizzja (L-Ewwel Awla) tal-5 ta’ Mejju 2011 (talba għal deċiżjoni preliminari tal-Bundesfinanzhof — il-Ġermanja) — Hauptzollamt Koblenz vs Kurt Etling, Thomas Etling (C-230/09), Hauptzollamt Oldenburg vs Theodor Aissen, Hermann Rohaan (C-231/09) (Agrikoltura — Settur tal-ħalib u tal-prodotti mill-ħalib — Regolament (KE) Nru 1788/2003 — Taxxa fil-qasam tal-ħalib u l-prodotti mill-ħalib — Regolament (KE) Nru 1782/2003 — Skemi diretti ta’ appoġġ fi ħdan il-politika agrikola komuni — Trasferiment ta’ kwantitajiet ta’ referenza individwali — Riperkussjonijiet fuq il-kalkolu tat-taxxa — Riperkussjonijiet fuq il-kalkolu tal-“premium” għall-prodotti mill-ħalib)
 Kawża C-391/09: Sentenza tal-Qorti tal-Ġustizzja (It-Tieni Awla) tat-12 ta’ Mejju 2011 (talba għal deċiżjoni preliminari tal-Vilniaus miesto 1 apylinkės teismas — Ir-Repubblika tal-Litwanja) — Malgožata Runevič-Vardyn, Łukasz Wardyn vs Vilniaus miesto savivaldybės administracija, Lietuvos Respublikos teisingumo ministerija, Valstybinė lietuvių kalbos komisija, Vilniaus miesto savivaldybės administracijos Teisės departamento Civilinės metrikacijos skyrius (“Ċittadinanza tal-Unjoni — Libertà ta’ moviment u residenza fl-Istati Membri — Prinċipju ta’ nondiskriminazzjoni abbażi tan-nazzjonalità — Artikoli 18 TFUE u 21 TFUE — Prinċipju ta’ trattament ugwali bejn il-persuni mingħajr distinzjoni abbażi ta’ razza jew oriġini etnika — Direttiva 2000/43/KE — Leġiżlazzjoni nazzjonali li timponi li l-kunjomijiet u l-ismijiet tal-persuni fiżiċi jinkitbu fl-atti tal-istat ċivili f’forma li tirrispetta r-regoli ortografiċi tal-lingwa uffiċjali nazzjonali”)
 Kawża C-543/09: Sentenza tal-Qorti tal-Ġustizzja (It-Tielet Awla) tal-5 ta’ Mejju 2011 (talba għal deċiżjoni preliminari tal- Bundesverwaltungsgericht — il-Ġermanja) — Deutsche Telekom AG vs Bundesrepublik Deutschland (“Komunikazzjonijiet elettroniċi — Direttiva 2002/22/KE — Artikolu 25(2) — Direttiva 2002/58/KE — Artikolu 12 — Provvista ta’ servizzi ta’ konsultazzjoni tad-direttorju u ta’ direttorji — Obbligu impost fuq impriża li tassenja numri tat-telefon sabiex tittrażmetti lil impriżi oħrajn id-data li hija jkollha dwar l-abbonati ta’ impriżi terzi”)
 Kawża C-107/10: Sentenza tal-Qorti tal-Ġustizzja (It-Tielet Awla) tat-12 ta’ Mejju 2011 (talba għal deċiżjoni preliminari tal-Administrativen sad Sofia-grad — il-Bulgarija) — Enel Maritsa Iztok 3 AD vs Direktor “Obzhalvane i upravlenie na izpalnenieto” NAP (Rinviju għal deċiżjoni preliminari — VAT — Direttivi 77/388/KEE u 2006/112/KE — Rimbors — Terminu — Interessi — Tpaċija — Prinċipji ta’ newtralità fiskali u ta’ proporzjonalità — Protezzjoni tal-aspettattivi leġittimi)
 Kawża C-144/10: Sentenza tal-Qorti tal-Ġustizzja (It-Tielet Awla) tat-12 ta’ Mejju 2011 (talba għal deċiżjoni preliminari tal-Kammergericht Berlin — il-Ġermanja) — Berliner Verkehrsbetriebe (BVG), Anstalt des öffentlichen Rechts vs JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A., Frankfurt Branch (Ġurisdizzjoni f’materji ċivili — Artikoli 22(2) u 27 tar-Regolament (KE) Nru 44/2001 — Ġurisdizzjoni esklużiva tal-qrati tal-Istat fejn tinsab is-sede biex jieħdu konjizzjoni ta’ kawżi dwar il-validità ta’ deċiżjonijiet tal-korpi tal-kumpanniji — Portata — Kawża mressqa minn persuna ġuridika rregolata mid-dritt pubbliku intiża li tikkonstata n-nullità ta’ kuntratt minħabba l-allegata invalidità ta’ deċiżjonijiet tal-korpi tagħha relatati mal-konklużjoni ta’ dan il-kuntratt — Lis pendens — Obbligu tat-tieni qorti li quddiemha tressqet il-kawża li tissospendi l-proċeduri — Portata)
 Kawżi magħquda C-201/10 u C-202/10: Sentenza tal-Qorti tal-Ġustizzja (Ir-Raba Awla) tal-5 ta’ Mejju 2011 (talba għal deċiżjoni preliminari tal-Finanzgericht Hamburg — il-Ġermanja) — Ze Fu Fleischhandel GmbH (C-201/10), Vion Trading GmbH (C-202/10) vs Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Jonas (“Regolament (KE, Euratom) Nru 2988/95 — Protezzjoni tal-interessi finanzjarji tal-Unjoni Ewropea — Artikolu 3 — Irkupru ta’ rifużjoni fuq l-esportazzjoni — Terminu ta’ preskrizzjoni trentennali — Regola ta’ preskrizzjoni li tifforma parti mid-dritt ċivili ġenerali ta’ Stat Membru — Applikazzjoni ‘per analogia’ — Prinċipju ta’ ċertezza legali — Prinċipju ta’ aspettattivi leġittimi — Prinċipju ta’ proporzjonalità”)
 Kawża C-294/10: Sentenza tal-Qorti tal-Ġustizzja (It-Tielet Awla) tat-12 ta’ Mejju 2011 (talba għal deċiżjoni preliminari tal-Augstākās tiesas Senāts – ir-Repubblika tal-Litwanja) — Andrejs Eglītis, Edvards Ratnieks vs Latvijas Republikas Ekonomikas ministrija (“Trasport bl-ajru — Regolament (KE) Nru 261/2004 — Artikolu 5(3) — Kumpens tal-passiġġieri fil-każ ta’ kanċellazzjoni ta’ titjira — Eżenzjoni mill-obbligu ta’ kumpens fil-każ ta’ ċirkustanzi straordinarji — Implementazzjoni, mit-trasportatur tal-ajru, tal-miżuri kollha raġonevoli sabiex jipprevjeni ċirkustanzi straordinarji — Pjanifikazzjoni ta’ riżorsi fiż-żmien opportun sabiex tkun tista’ tiġi żgurata t-titjira wara li tali ċirkustanzi jintemmu”)
 Kawża C-479/10: Sentenza tal-Qorti tal-Ġustizzja (Il-Ħames Awla) tal-10 ta’ Mejju 2011 — Il-Kummissjoni Ewropea vs Ir-Renju tal-Isvezja (Nuqqas ta’ Stat li jwettaq obbligu — Ambjent — Direttiva 1999/30/KE — Kontroll tat-tniġġis — Valuri ta’ limitu għall-konċentrazzjonijiet ta’ PM10 fl-arja ambjentali)
 Kawża C-128/11: Talba għal deċiżjoni preliminari mressqa mill-Bundesgerichtshof (il-Ġermanja) fl-14 ta’ Marzu 2011 — UsedSoft GmbH vs Oracle International Corp.
 Kawża C-165/11: Talba għal deċiżjoni preliminari mressqa min-Najvyšší súd (ir-Repubblika Slovakka) fl-4 ta’ April 2011 — Daňové riaditeľstvo Slovenskej republiky vs Profitube spol. s.r.o.
 Kawża C-173/11: Talba għal deċiżjoni preliminari mressqa mill-Court of Appeal (England & Wales) (Civil Division) (Ir-Renju Unit) fit-8 ta’ April 2011 — Football Dataco Ltd, Scottish Premier League Ltd, Scottish Football League, PA Sport UK Ltd vs Sportradar GmbH (kumpannija rreġistrata fil-Ġermanja), Sportradar (kumpannija rreġistrata fl-Isvizzera)
 Kawża C-177/11: Talba għal deċiżjoni preliminari mressqa mis-Symvoulio tis Epikrateias (il-Greċja) fil-15 ta’ April 2011 — Syllogos Ellinon Poleodomon kai Chorotakton vs 1) Il-Ministru tal-Ambjent, tal-Ippjanar tat-territorju u tax-Xogħlijiet pubbliċi, 2) Il-Ministru tal-Ekonomija u tal-Finanzi u 3) Il-Ministru tal-Intern, tas-Servizz pubbliku u tad-Deċentralizzazzjoni
 Kawża C-209/11: Talba għal deċiżjoni preliminari mressqa mis-Symvoulio tis Epikrateias (il-Greċja) fl-4 ta’ Mejju 2011 — Sportingbet PLC vs Ypourgos Politismou, Ypourgos Oikonomias kai Oikonomikon
 Kawża T-423/07: Sentenza tal-Qorti Ġenerali tad-19 ta’ Mejju 2011 — Ryanair vs Il-Kummissjoni (“Għajnuna mill-Istat — Kompetizzjoni — Abbuż minn pożizzjoni dominanti — Settur tal-avjazzjoni — Użu esklużiv tat-terminal 2 tal-ajruport ta’ München — Rikors għal nuqqas li tittieħed azzjoni — Teħid ta’ pożizzjoni mill-Kummissjoni — Ma hemmx lok li tingħata deċiżjoni — Obbligu li tittieħed azzjoni — Assenza”)
 Kawża T-502/07: Sentenza tal-Qorti Ġenerali tat-18 ta’ Mejju 2011 — IIC Intersport International vs UASI — McKenzie (McKENZIE) (“Trade mark Komunitarja — Proċediment ta’ oppożizzjoni — Applikazzjoni għat-trade mark Komunitarja figurattiva McKENZIE — Trade marks Komunitarji figurattivi u verbali preċedenti McKINLEY — Raġuni relattiva għal rifjut — Probabbiltà ta’ konfużjoni — Artikolu 8(1)(b) tar-Regolament (KE) Nru 40/94 (li sar l-Artikolu 8(1)(b) tar-Regolament (KE) Nru 207/2009)”)
 Kawża T-207/08: Sentenza tal-Qorti Ġenerali tat-18 ta’ Mejju 2011 — Habanos vs UASI — Tabacos de Centroamérica (KIOWA) (“Trade mark Komunitarja — Proċedimenti ta’ oppożizzjoni — Applikazzjoni għat-trade mark Komunitarja figurattiva KIOWA — Trade marks Komunitarji u nazzjonali figurattivi preċedeni COHIBA — Raġuni relattiva għal rifjut — Nuqqas ta’ probabbiltà ta’ konfużjoni — Nuqqas ta’ xebh tas-sinjali — Artikolu 8(1)(b) tar-Regolament (CE) Nru 40/94 (li sar l-Artikolu 8(1)(b) tar-Regolament (KE) Nru 207/2009)”)
 Kawża T-580/08: Sentenza tal-Qorti Ġenerali tad-19 ta’ Mejju 2011 — PJ Hungary vs UASI — Pepekillo (PEPEQUILLO) (Trade mark Komunitarja — Proċedimenti ta’ oppożizzjoni — Applikazzjoni għat-trade mark Komunitarja verbali PEPEQUILLO — Trade marks nazzjonali u Komunitarji verbali u figurattivi preċedenti PEPE u PEPE JEANS — Restitutio in integrum — Raġuni relattiva għal rifjut — Probabbiltà ta’ konfużjoni — Xebh tal-prodotti — Artikolu 78 tar-Regolament (KE) Nru 40/94 (li sar l-Artikolu 81 tar-Regolament (KE) Nru 207/2009) — Artikolu 8(1)(b) u (5) tar-Regolament Nru 40/94 (li sar l-Artikolu 8(1)(b) u (5) tar-Regolament Nru 207/2009))
 Kawża T-376/09: Sentenza tal-Qorti Ġenerali tat-18 ta’ Mejju 2011 — Glenton España vs UASI — Polo/Lauren (POLO SANTA MARIA) (“Trade mark Komunitarja — Proċedimenti ta’ oppożizzjoni — Talba għal trade mark Komunitarja figurattiva POLO SANTA MARIA — Trade mark Benelux figurattiva preċedenti li tirrappreżenta siluwett ta’ plejer tal-polo — Raġuni relattiva għal rifjut — Probabbiltà ta’ konfużjoni — Artikolu 8(1)(b) tar-Regolament (KE) Nru 207/2009”)
 Kawża T-81/10: Sentenza tal-Qorti Ġenerali tad-19 ta’ Mejju 2011 — Tempus Vade vs UASI — Palacios Serrano (AIR FORCE) (“Trade mark Komunitarja — Proċedimenti ta’ oppożizzjoni — Applikazzjoni għat-trade mark Komunitarja verbali AIR FORCE — Trade marks Komunitarji u nazzjonali verbali u figurattivi preċedenti TIME FORCE — Raġunijiet relattivi għal rifjut — Nuqqas ta’ probabbiltà ta’ konfużjoni — Nuqqas ta’ xebħ tas-sinjali — Artikolu 8(1)(b) u (5) tar-Regolament (KE) Nru 207/2009”)
 Kawża T-206/11: Rikors ippreżentat fl-4 ta’ April 2011 — COMPLEX S.A. vs UASI — Kajometal 5KX)
 Kawża T-207/11: Rikors ippreżentat fit-8 ta’ April 2011 — EyeSense vs UASI — Osypka Medical (ISENSE)
 Kawża T-216/11: Rikors ippreżentat fit-18 ta’ April 2011 — Progust, SL vs UASI — Sopralex & Vosmarques (IMPERIA)
 Kawża T-219/11: Rikors ippreżentat fit-15 ta’ April 2011 — José Luis Otero Gonzàlez vs UASI — Apli-Agipa (AGIPA)
 Kawża T-220/11: Rikors ippreżentat fit-18 ta’ April 2011 — TeamBank AG Nürnberg vs UASI — Fercredit Servizi Finanziari (f@ir Credit)
 Kawża T-223/11: Rikors ippreżentat fl-20 ta’ April 2011 — Siemens vs Il-Kummissjoni
 Kawża T-224/11: Rikors ippreżentat fil-21 ta’ April 2011 — Caventa AG vs UASI
 Kawża T-225/11: Rikors ippreżentat fil-21 ta’ April 2011 — Caventa vs UASI — Anson’s Herrenhaus (BERG)
 Kawża T-227/11: Rikors ippreżentat fis-26 ta’ April 2011 — Wall vs UASI — Bluepod Media Worldwide (bluepod media)
 Kawża T-232/11: Rikors ippreżentat fl-4 ta’ Mejju 2011 — Stichting Greenpeace Nederland u PAN Europe vs Il-Kummissjoni
 Kawża T-243/11: Rikors ippreżentat fis-26 ta’ April 2011 — Glaxo Group vs UASI — Farmodiética (ADVANCE)
 Kawża T-245/11: Rikors ippreżentat fis-6 ta’ Mejju 2011 — ClientEarth and International Chemical Secretariat vs ECHA


text:
 21.7.2021
 DE
 Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union
 L 260/3
 ABKOMMEN IN FORM EINES BRIEFWECHSELS ZWISCHEN DER EUROPÄISCHEN UNION UND DER REPUBLIK INDONESIEN NACH ARTIKEL XXVIII DES ALLGEMEINEN ZOLL- UND HANDELSABKOMMENS (GATT) 1994 ÜBER DIE ÄNDERUNG DER ZUGESTÄNDNISSE FÜR ALLE IN DER EU-LISTE CLXXV AUFGEFÜHRTEN ZOLLKONTINGENTE INFOLGE DES AUSTRITTS DES VEREINIGTEN KÖNIGREICHS AUS DER EUROPÄISCHEN UNION
 A. Schreiben der Europäischen Union
 Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren,
 Im Anschluss an die Verhandlungen nach Artikel XXVIII des Allgemeinen Zoll- und Handelsabkommens (GATT) 1994 über die Änderung der Zugeständnisse für alle in der Zolltarifliste CLXXV der Europäischen Union aufgeführten Zollkontingente infolge des Austritts des Vereinigten Königreichs aus der Europäischen Union (EU) kommen Indonesien und die EU — wie den WTO-Mitgliedern im Dokument G/SECRET/42/Add.2 mitgeteilt — überein, die Verhandlungen auf folgender Grundlage abzuschließen:
 Indonesien stimmt dem Grundsatz und der Methode zu, die vorgesehenen quantitativen Verpflichtungen in Form von Zollkontingenten der EU, die bislang auch das Vereinigte Königreich umfassten, so aufzuteilen, dass die EU ohne das Vereinigte Königreich eine bestimmte Menge dieser Kontingente übernimmt und die verbleibende Menge vom Vereinigten Königreich übernommen wird.
 Bezüglich des Zollkontingents 053 (Maniok, bestehend aus den Zolltarifpositionen ex 0714 10 00, 0714 30 00, 0714 40 00, 0714 50 00, 0714 90 20), das im Dokument G/SECRET/42/Add.2 festgelegt ist und für das Indonesien Verhandlungsrechte hält, kommen die EU und Indonesien überein, dass die vorgesehene quantitative Verpflichtung für dieses Erzeugnis für die EU ohne das Vereinigte Königreich 165 000 Tonnen beträgt. Die Bedingungen für dieses Zollkontingent, wie sie bereits in der EU-Liste CLXXV festgelegt sind (präferenzieller Ad-valorem-Kontingentszollsatz von 6 %), und die Verwaltung im Einklang mit den EU-Vorschriften bleiben von dieser Aufteilung unberührt.
 Die EU und Indonesien notifizieren einander den Abschluss ihrer für das Inkrafttreten dieses Abkommens erforderlichen internen Verfahren. Dieses Abkommen tritt am Tag der letzten Notifikation in Kraft.
 Ich wäre Ihnen dankbar, wenn Sie mir die Zustimmung Ihrer Regierung hierzu bestätigten.Ich beehre mich vorzuschlagen, dass dieses Schreiben (in bulgarischer, dänischer, deutscher, englischer, estnischer, finnischer, französischer, griechischer, italienischer, kroatischer, lettischer, litauischer, maltesischer, niederländischer, polnischer, portugiesischer, rumänischer, schwedischer, slowakischer, slowenischer, spanischer, tschechischer, ungarischer und indonesischer Sprache, wobei jeder Wortlaut gleichermaßen verbindlich ist) und die Bestätigung Ihrer Regierung als Antwort zusammen für die Zwecke des Artikels XXVIII Absatz 3 Buchstaben a und b des GATT 1994 ein Abkommen in Form eines Briefwechsels zwischen der Europäischen Union und der Republik Indonesien bilden.
 Gestatten Sie mir den Ausdruck meiner vorzüglichen Hochachtung.
 B. Schreiben Indonesiens
 Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren,
 ich beehre mich, den Eingang Ihres heutigen Schreibens zu bestätigen, das wie folgt lautet:
 „Im Anschluss an die Verhandlungen nach Artikel XXVIII des Allgemeinen Zoll- und Handelsabkommens (GATT) 1994 über die Änderung der Zugeständnisse für alle in der Zolltarifliste CLXXV der Europäischen Union aufgeführten Zollkontingente infolge des Austritts des Vereinigten Königreichs aus der Europäischen Union (EU) kommen Indonesien und die EU — wie den WTO-Mitgliedern im Dokument G/SECRET/42/Add.2 mitgeteilt — überein, die Verhandlungen auf folgender Grundlage abzuschließen:
 Indonesien stimmt dem Grundsatz und der Methode zu, die vorgesehenen quantitativen Verpflichtungen in Form von Zollkontingenten der EU, die bislang auch das Vereinigte Königreich umfassten, so aufzuteilen, dass die EU ohne das Vereinigte Königreich eine bestimmte Menge dieser Kontingente übernimmt und die verbleibende Menge vom Vereinigten Königreich übernommen wird.
 Bezüglich des Zollkontingents 053 (Maniok, bestehend aus den Zolltarifpositionen ex 0714 10 00, 0714 30 00, 0714 40 00, 0714 50 00, 0714 90 20), das im Dokument G/SECRET/42/Add.2 festgelegt ist und für das Indonesien Verhandlungsrechte hält, kommen die EU und Indonesien überein, dass die vorgesehene quantitative Verpflichtung für dieses Erzeugnis für die EU ohne das Vereinigte Königreich 165 000 Tonnen beträgt. Die Bedingungen für dieses Zollkontingent, wie sie bereits in der EU-Liste CLXXV festgelegt sind (präferenzieller Ad-valorem-Kontingentszollsatz von 6 %), und die Verwaltung im Einklang mit den EU-Vorschriften bleiben von dieser Aufteilung unberührt.
 Die EU und Indonesien notifizieren einander den Abschluss ihrer für das Inkrafttreten dieses Abkommens erforderlichen internen Verfahren. Dieses Abkommen tritt am Tag der letzten Notifikation in Kraft.
 Ich wäre Ihnen dankbar, wenn Sie mir die Zustimmung Ihrer Regierung hierzu bestätigten. Ich beehre mich vorzuschlagen, dass das vorliegende Schreiben (in bulgarischer, dänischer, deutscher, englischer, estnischer, finnischer, französischer, griechischer, italienischer, kroatischer, lettischer, litauischer, maltesischer, niederländischer, polnischer, portugiesischer, rumänischer, schwedischer, slowakischer, slowenischer, spanischer, tschechischer, ungarischer und indonesischer Sprache, wobei jeder Wortlaut gleichermaßen verbindlich ist) und die entsprechende Bestätigung Ihrer Regierung als Antwort zusammen für die Zwecke des Artikels XXVIII Absatz 3 Buchstaben a und b des GATT 1994 ein Abkommen in Form eines Briefwechsels zwischen der Europäischen Union und der Republik Indonesien bilden.“
 Ich beehre mich, die Zustimmung meiner Regierung zum vorstehenden Schreiben zum Ausdruck zu bringen.


text:
 30.7.2015
 NL
 Publicatieblad van de Europese Unie
 L 202/54
 BESLUIT VAN HET GEMENGD COMITÉ VAN DE EER
 Nr. 200/2014
 van 25 september 2014
 tot wijziging van bijlage XXI (Statistiek) bij de EER-overeenkomst [2015/1268]
 HET GEMENGD COMITÉ VAN DE EER,
 Gezien de Overeenkomst betreffende de Europese Economische Ruimte (de „EER-overeenkomst”), en met name artikel 98,
 Overwegende hetgeen volgt:
 (1)
 Verordening (EU) nr. 549/2013 van het Europees Parlement en de Raad van 21 mei 2013 betreffende het Europees systeem van nationale en regionale rekeningen in de Europese Unie (1) was opgenomen in de EER-overeenkomst bij Besluit van het Gemengd Comité van de EER nr. 58/2014 van 8 april 2014 (2).
 (2)
 De deadline voor het indienen van een verzoek tot afwijking aan de bevoegde Toezichtsautoriteit moet worden aangepast naar 17 oktober 2013, zoals aangegeven in artikel 6, lid 3, van Verordening (EU) nr. 549/2013, zodat de EVA-staten hun aanvraag tot verzoek om afwijkingen overeenkomstig artikel 6, leden 1 en 2, kunnen indienen.
 (3)
 Bijlage XXI bij de EER-overeenkomst dient derhalve dienovereenkomstig te worden gewijzigd,
 HEEFT HET VOLGENDE BESLUIT VASTGESTELD:
 Artikel 1
 In bijlage XXI bij de EER-overeenkomst wordt punt 19z (Verordening (EU) nr. 549/2013 van het Europees Parlement en de Raad) als volgt gewijzigd:
 1)
 Aanpassingen b) en c) worden als aanpassingen c) en d) hernummerd.
 2)
 De volgende aanpassing is ingevoegd:
 „b)
 In artikel 6, lid 3, worden de woorden „17 oktober 2013” vervangen door de woorden „drie maanden na de inwerkingtreding van het Besluit nr. 200/2014 van het Gemengd Comité van de EER van 25 september 2014”, wat betreft de EVA-staten”.
 Artikel 2
 Dit besluit treedt in werking op 26 september 2014, op voorwaarde dat alle in artikel 103, lid 1, van de EER-overeenkomst bedoelde kennisgevingen hebben plaatsgevonden (3)
 Artikel 3
 Dit besluit wordt bekendgemaakt in het EER-gedeelte van en in het EER-supplement bij het Publicatieblad van de Europese Unie.
 Gedaan te Brussel, 25 september 2014.
 Voor het Gemengd Comité van de EER
 De voorzitter
 Kurt JÄGER
 (1) PB L 174 van 26.6.2013, blz. 1.
 (2) PB L 256 van 28.8.2014, blz. 35.
 (3) Geen grondwettelijke vereisten aangegeven.


type: legislation

text:
 15.1.2015
 IT
 Gazzetta ufficiale dell'Unione europea
 L 9/8
 REGOLAMENTO DI ESECUZIONE (UE) 2015/47 DELLA COMMISSIONE
 del 14 gennaio 2015
 relativo all'autorizzazione di un preparato di alfa-amilasi prodotto dal Bacillus licheniformis (DSM 21564) come additivo per mangimi destinati a vacche da latte (titolare dell'autorizzazione DSM Nutritional Products Ltd., rappresentata da DSM Nutritional Products Sp.Z.o.o)
 (Testo rilevante ai fini del SEE)
 LA COMMISSIONE EUROPEA,
 visto il trattato sul funzionamento dell'Unione europea,
 visto il regolamento (CE) n. 1831/2003 del Parlamento europeo e del Consiglio, del 22 settembre 2003, sugli additivi destinati all'alimentazione animale (1), in particolare l'articolo 9, paragrafo 2,
 considerando quanto segue:
 (1)
 Il regolamento (CE) n. 1831/2003 disciplina l'autorizzazione degli additivi destinati all'alimentazione animale e definisce i motivi e le procedure per il rilascio di tale autorizzazione.
 (2)
 In conformità all'articolo 7 del regolamento (CE) n. 1831/2003 è stata presentata una domanda di autorizzazione di un preparato di alfa-amilasi prodotto dal Bacillus licheniformis (DSM 21564). Tale domanda era corredata delle informazioni dettagliate e dei documenti prescritti dall'articolo 7, paragrafo 3, del regolamento (CE) n. 1831/2003.
 (3)
 La domanda concerne l'autorizzazione di un preparato di alfa-amilasi prodotto da Bacillus licheniformis (DSM 21564) come additivo per mangimi destinati a vacche da latte, da classificare nella categoria «additivi zootecnici».
 (4)
 Nei pareri del 15 giugno 2012 (2) e del 9 ottobre 2013 (3), l'Autorità europea per la sicurezza alimentare («l'Autorità») ha concluso che, nelle condizioni d'impiego proposte, il preparato di alfa-amilasi prodotto dal Bacillus licheniformis (DSM 21564) non ha effetti dannosi sulla salute degli animali, sulla salute umana o sull'ambiente. L'Autorità ha osservato inoltre che durante la prima metà del periodo di lattazione l'additivo ha aumentato notevolmente la resa lattiera. Essa ha tuttavia ritenuto che non si potesse trarre tale conclusione per tutto il periodo di lattazione. L'Autorità ritiene che non siano necessarie prescrizioni specifiche per il monitoraggio successivo all'immissione sul mercato. Ha esaminato anche la relazione sul metodo di analisi dell'additivo per mangimi negli alimenti per animali presentata dal laboratorio di riferimento istituito dal regolamento (CE) n. 1831/2003.
 (5)
 La valutazione del preparato di alfa-amilasi prodotto dal Bacillus licheniformis (DSM 21564) dimostra che sono soddisfatte le condizioni per l'autorizzazione di cui all'articolo 5 del regolamento (CE) n. 1831/2003. È pertanto opportuno autorizzare l'impiego di tale preparato come specificato nell'allegato del presente regolamento.
 (6)
 Le misure di cui al presente regolamento sono conformi al parere del comitato permanente per le piante, gli animali, gli alimenti e i mangimi,
 HA ADOTTATO IL PRESENTE REGOLAMENTO:
 Articolo 1
 Autorizzazione
 Il preparato specificato nell'allegato, appartenente alla categoria «additivi zootecnici» e al gruppo funzionale «promotori della digestione», è autorizzato come additivo nell'alimentazione animale alle condizioni fissate in tale allegato.
 Articolo 2
 Il presente regolamento entra in vigore il ventesimo giorno successivo alla pubblicazione nella Gazzetta ufficiale dell'Unione europea.
 Il presente regolamento è obbligatorio in tutti i suoi elementi e direttamente applicabile in ciascuno degli Stati membri.
 Fatto a Bruxelles, il 14 gennaio 2015
 Per la Commissione
 Il presidente
 Jean-Claude JUNCKER
 (1) GU L 268 del 18.10.2003, pag. 29.
 (2) EFSA Journal 2012; 10(7):2777.
 (3) EFSA Journal 2013; 11(10):3434.
 ALLEGATO
 Numero di identificazione dell'additivo
 Nome del titolare dell'autorizzazione
 Additivo
 Composizione, formula chimica, descrizione, metodo di analisi
 Specie animale o categoria di animali
 Età massima
 Tenore minimo
 Tenore massimo
 Altre disposizioni
 Fine del periodo di autorizzazione
 Unità di attività/kg di mangime completo con un tenore di umidità del 12 %
 Categoria: additivi zootecnici. Gruppo funzionale: promotori della digestione.
 4a21
 DSM Nutritional Products Ltd., rappresentata da DSM Nutritional Products Sp. Z.o.o
 ALFA-amilasi
 EC 3.2.1.1
 Composizione dell'additivo
 Preparato di alfa-amilasi prodotto dal Bacillus licheniformis (DSM 21564) avente un'attività minima di:
 in forma solida: 160 KNU (1)/g;
 in forma liquida: 240 KNU/g.
 Caratterizzazione della sostanza attiva
 ALFA-amilasi EC 3.2.1.1 prodotta dal Bacillus licheniformis (DSM 21564)
 Metodo di analisi
 (2)
 Determinazione dell'alfa-amilasi:
 metodo colorimetrico basato sulla quantificazione dei frammenti colorati prodotti dall'azione dell'alfa-amilasi su substrati di amido rosso.
 Vacche da latte
 —
 300 KNU
 —
 1.
 Nelle istruzioni per l'uso dell'additivo e della premiscela indicare le condizioni di conservazione e la stabilità quando incorporato in pellet.
 2.
 Da utilizzare fino alla 14a settimana di lattazione.
 3.
 Per motivi di sicurezza: durante la manipolazione utilizzare dispositivi di protezione dell'apparato respiratorio, occhiali e guanti.
 4 febbraio 2025
 (1) 1 KNU è il quantitativo di enzima che libera 6 micromoli di p-nitrofenolo al minuto a partire da 1,86 mM di etilidene-G7-p-nitrofenil-maltoeptaoside a pH 7,0 e a 37 °C.
 (2) Informazioni dettagliate sui metodi di analisi sono disponibili al seguente indirizzo del laboratorio di riferimento: https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en/eurl/feed-additives/evaluation-reports


text:
 4.10.2012
 BG
 Официален вестник на Европейския съюз
 L 270/38
 РЕШЕНИЕ НА СЪВМЕСТНИЯ КОМИТЕТ НА ЕИП
 No 115/2012
 от 15 юни 2012 година
 за изменение на приложение XX (Околна среда) към Споразумението за ЕИП
 СЪВМЕСТНИЯТ КОМИТЕТ НА ЕИП,
 като взе предвид Споразумението за Европейското икономическо пространство, изменено с Протокола за адаптиране на Споразумението за Европейското икономическо пространство, наричано по-нататък „Споразумението“, и по-специално член 98 от него,
 като има предвид, че:
 (1)
 Приложение XX към Споразумението беше изменено с Решение на Съвместния комитет на ЕИП No 97/2012 от 30 април 2012 г. (1)
 (2)
 Директива 2009/31/ЕО на Европейския парламент и на Съвета от 23 април 2009 г. относно съхранението на въглероден диоксид в геоложки формации и за изменение на Директива 85/337/ЕИО на Съвета, директиви 2000/60/ЕО, 2001/80/ЕО, 2004/35/ЕО, 2006/12/ЕО и 2008/1/ЕО и Регламент (ЕО) No 1013/2006 на Европейския парламент и на Съвета (2) следва да бъде включена в Споразумението,
 ПРИЕ НАСТОЯЩОТО РЕШЕНИЕ:
 Член 1
 Приложение XX към Споразумението се изменя, както следва:
 1.
 В точка 1a (Директива 85/337/ЕИО на Съвета), 1и (Директива 2004/35/ЕО на Европейския парламент и на Съвета), 13ва (Директива 2000/60/ЕО на Европейския парламент и на Съвета), 19а (Директива 2001/80/ЕО на Европейския парламент и на Съвета) и 32в (Регламент (ЕО) No 1013/2006 на Европейския парламент и на Съвета) се добавя следното тире:
 „—
 32009 L 0031: Директива 2009/31/ЕО на Европейския парламент и на Съвета от 23 април 2009 г. (ОВ L 140, 5.6.2009 г., стр. 114).“
 2.
 В точка 1е (Директива 2008/1/ЕО на Европейския парламент и на Съвета) се добавя следното:
 „, изменена със:
 —
 32009 L 0031: Директива 2009/31/ЕО на Европейския парламент и на Съвета от 23 април 2009 г. (ОВ L 140, 5.6.2009 г., стр. 114).“
 3.
 След точка 21ат (Регламент (ЕО) No 748/2009 на Комисията) се вмъква следната точка:
 „21ау.
 32009 L 0031: Директива 2009/31/ЕО на Европейския парламент и на Съвета от 23 април 2009 г. относно съхранението на въглероден диоксид в геоложки формации и за изменение на Директива 85/337/ЕИО на Съвета, директиви 2000/60/ЕО, 2001/80/ЕО, 2004/35/ЕО, 2006/12/ЕО и 2008/1/ЕО и Регламент (ЕО) No 1013/2006 на Европейския парламент и на Съвета (ОВ L 140, 5.6.2009 г., стр. 114).“
 Член 2
 Текстовете на Директива 2009/31/ЕО на исландски и норвежки език, които ще бъдат публикувани в притурката за ЕИП към Официален вестник на Европейския съюз, са автентични.
 Член 3
 Настоящото решение влиза в сила на 16 юни 2012 г., при условие че всички нотификации, предвидени в член 103, параграф 1 от Споразумението, са внесени в Съвместния комитет на ЕИП (3).
 Член 4
 Настоящото решение се публикува в раздела за ЕИП и в притурката за ЕИП към Официален вестник на Европейския съюз.
 Съставено в Брюксел на 15 юни 2012 година.
 За Съвместния комитет на ЕИП
 Изпълняващ длъжността председател
 Gianluca GRIPPA
 (1) ОВ L 248, 13.9.2012 г., стр. 35.
 (2) ОВ L 140, 5.6.2009 г., стр. 114.
 (3) С отбелязани конституционни изисквания.


text:
 10.11.2012
 SV
 Europeiska unionens officiella tidning
 C 343/15
 Tribunalens dom av den 21 september 2012 — Wesergold Getränkeindustrie GmbH & Co. KG mot harmoniseringsbyrån
 (Mål T-278/10) (1)
 (Gemenskapsvarumärke - Invändningsförfarande - Ansökan om registrering som gemenskapsvarumärke av ordmärket WESTERN GOLD - Äldre nationella ordmärken samt internationellt ordmärke och gemenskapsordmärke WESERGOLD, Wesergold och WeserGold - Relativa registreringshinder - Risk för förväxling föreligger inte - Artikel 8.1 b i förordning (EG) nr 207/2009 - De äldre varumärkenas särskiljningsförmåga)
 2012/C 343/23
 Rättegångsspråk: tyska
 Parter
 Sökande: Wesergold Getränkeindustrie GmbH & Co. KG (Rinteln, Tyskland) (ombud: advokaterna P. Goldenbaum, T. Melchert och I. Rohr)
 Svarande: Byrån för harmonisering inom den inre marknaden (varumärken, mönster och modeller) (ombud: R. Pethke)
 Motpart vid överklagandenämnden, som intervenerat vid tribunalen: Lidl Stiftung & Co. KG (Neckarsulm, Tyskland) (ombud: advokaterna A. Marx och M. Schaeffer)
 Saken
 Talan mot det beslut som fattats av harmoniseringsbyråns första överklagandenämnd den 24 mars 2010 (ärende R 770/2009-1) om ett invändningsförfarande mellan Wesergold Getränkeindustrie GmbH & Co. KG och Lidl Stiftung & Co. KG.
 Domslut
 1.
 Det beslut som fattats av första överklagandenämnden vid Byrån för harmonisering inom den inre marknaden (varumärken, mönster och modeller) (harmoniseringsbyrån) den 24 mars 2010 (ärende R 770/2009-1) ogiltigförklaras.
 2.
 Harmoniseringsbyrån ska bära sina egna rättegångskostnader och ersätta rättegångskostnaderna för Wesergold Getränkeindustrie GmbH & Co. KG.
 3.
 Lidl Stiftung & Co. KG ska bära sina egna rättegångskostnader.
 (1) EUT C 221, 14.8.2010.


jurisdiction: US

text: b' Department of Homeland Security\n\n \xef\xbf\xbd\xef\xbf\xbd\xef\xbf\xbd\xef\xbf\xbd\xef\xbf\xbd\xef\xbf\xbd\xef\xbf\xbd\xef\xbf\xbd\xef\xbf\xbd\xef\xbf\xbd\xef\xbf\xbd\xef\xbf\xbd\xef\xbf\xbd\xef\xbf\xbd\xef\xbf\xbd\xef\xbf\xbd\xef\xbf\xbd\xef\xbf\xbd\xef\xbf\xbd\xef\xbf\xbd\xef\xbf\xbd\xef\xbf\xbd\xef\xbf\xbd\xef\xbf\xbd\xef\xbf\xbd\xef\xbf\xbd\n\n\n\n U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services\xe2\x80\x99 Tracking \n\nand Monitoring of Potentially Fraudulent Petitions and \n\n Applications for Family-Based Immigration Benefits \n\n\n\n\n\nOIG-13-97 June 2013\n\n\x0c OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL\n Department of Homeland Security\n Washington, DC 20528 / www.oig.dhs.gov\n\n\n June 12, 2013\n\nMEMORANDUM FOR: \t The Honorable Alejandro Mayorkas\n Director\n U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services\n\nFROM: Charles K. Edwards\n Deputy Inspector General\n\nSUBJECT: U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services\xe2\x80\x99 Tracking and\n Monitoring of Potentially Fraudulent Petitions and\n Applications for Family-Based Immigration Benefits\n\nAttached for your information is our final letter report, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration\nServices\xe2\x80\x99 Tracking and Monitoring of Potentially Fraudulent Petitions and Applications\nfor Family-Based Immigration Benefits. We incorporated the formal comments from the\nU.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services in the final report.\n\nThe report contains one recommendation aimed at improving procedures to record,\nupdate, and monitor fraud-related information. Your office concurred with the\nrecommendation. As prescribed by the Department of Homeland Security Directive\n077-01, Follow-Up and Resolution for Office of Inspector General Report\nRecommendations, within 90 days of the date of this memorandum, please provide our\noffice with a written response that includes your (1) agreement or disagreement,\n(2) corrective action plan, and (3) target completion date for each recommendation.\nAlso, please include responsible parties and any other supporting documentation\nnecessary to inform us about the current status of the recommendation. Until your\nresponse is received and evaluated, the recommendations will be considered open and\nunresolved.\n\nConsistent with our responsibility under the Inspector General Act, we are providing\n\ncopies of our report to appropriate congressional committees with oversight and \n\nappropriation responsibility over the Department of Homeland Security. We will post\n\nthe report on our website for public dissemination.\n\n\nMajor contributors to this report are Brad Mosher, Audit Manager; Chris Chamberlain,\n\nAuditor; Elaine Ferguson, Auditor; Richard Joyce, Auditor; Keith Lutgen, Auditor; \n\nMatt Noll, Auditor; Katrina Bynes, Referencer; and Kelly Herberger, Communications \n\nAnalyst.\n\n\nPlease call me with any questions, or your staff may contact Anne L. Richards, Assistant \n\nInspector General for Audits, at (202) 254-4100. \n\n\nAttachment\n\n\x0c OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL\n Department of Homeland Security\n\n\n Background\n In the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), U.S. Citizenship and Immigration\n Services (USCIS) oversees lawful immigration to the United States. U.S. immigration law\n grants permanent resident status to aliens who legally marry a U.S. citizen or lawful\n permanent resident and to certain aliens who are family members of U.S. citizens or\n lawful permanent residents. Immigration benefits may lead to the right to apply for and\n receive Social Security and Medicare benefits and food stamps, and the opportunity to\n sponsor alien spouses and relatives for permanent residency.\n\n We performed this audit to determine whether USCIS recorded information about\n adjudicated family-based petitions and applications suspected of being fraudulent\n according to agency policy requirements and in a manner that deterred immigration\n fraud.\n\n U.S. citizens or lawful permanent residents who petition to sponsor a qualifying family\n member, including a spouse, must file a PetitionfforfAlienfRelative (Form I-130) with\n USCIS.1 USCIS officers adjudicate I-130 petitions at field offices or service centers.\n Through the I-130 adjudication process, USCIS must validate that the petitioner is a\n U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident. When the petitioner is sponsoring an alien\n spouse, the petitioner must establish that the marriage is valid. For petitioners\n sponsoring relatives, USCIS must determine the validity of the relationship before\n approving the I-130 petition.\n\n Approval of an I-130 petition grants an alien immediate relative already residing in the\n United States the ability to apply for permanent residence by filing an Applicationftof\n RegisterfPermanentfResidenceforfAdjustfStatus (Form I-485). An alien spouse or alien\n immediate relative who has an approved I-130 petition and is residing outside the\n United States may apply at a U.S. embassy or consulate for an immigrant visa to live in\n the United States. USCIS offices process all I-130 petitions and I-485 applications filed\n concurrently.\n\n According to USCIS policy, I-130 petitions and I-485 applications suspected of being\n fraudulent are to be referred to the USCIS Fraud Detection and National Security\n Directorate (FDNS) for further investigation. FDNS personnel are located in every\n domestic USCIS service center, as well as in district, field, and asylum offices and in\n certain overseas offices; they report to field management in field offices and service\n\n 1\n U.S. citizens may apply for their husband or wife or their married or unmarried children. If they are at\n least 21 years of age, they may also petition for parents, brothers, or sisters. Lawful permanent residents\n may apply for their husband or wife and unmarried children, regardless of age.\n\n\nwww.oig.dhs.gov 2 OIG-13-97 \n\n\x0c OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL\n Department of Homeland Security\n\n centers. Once they complete their investigation, FDNS officers return the petition or\n application to adjudicators with a Statement of Findings (SOF) summarizing their work\n and identifying one of the following results: (1) Fraud Found; (2) Fraud Not Found; or\n (3) Inconclusive. Adjudicators consider the SOF when deciding whether to grant\n immigration benefits.\n\n USCIS initially reviews I-130 petitions for aliens located overseas who wish to obtain a\n visa to live in the United States. USCIS then forwards approved I-130 petitions to a\n Department of State consular officer, who conducts an interview to determine eligibility\n of the alien into the United States. The Department of State sends petitions that are\n suspected of or found to be fraudulent back to a USCIS service center as consular\n returns. USCIS policy requires that all consular returns suspected of or determined to\n be fraudulent be returned to the originating service center and routed to FDNS for\n investigation and creation of a case file in the FDNS-Data System (FDNS-DS) and in TECS,\n when applicable.2 USCIS may either reaffirm or revoke petitions suspected of being\n fraudulent. When a USCIS adjudicator reaffirms a petition, the original petition is\n returned to Department of State with a cover letter explaining why the petition was\n reaffirmed. When an adjudicator revokes a petition, the Department of State can no\n longer issue a visa.\n\n Results of Audit\n USCIS has procedures to track and monitor documentation related to petitions and\n applications for family-based immigration benefits suspected of being fraudulent.\n However, once family-based immigration petitions and applications were investigated\n and adjudicated, fraud-related data were not always recorded and updated in\n appropriate electronic databases to ensure their accuracy, completeness, and reliability.\n Specifically, FDNS personnel did not record in appropriate electronic databases all\n petitions and applications denied, revoked, or rescinded because of fraud. Supervisors\n also did not review the data entered into the databases to monitor case resolution.\n Without accurate data and adequate supervisory review, USCIS may have limited its\n ability to track, monitor, and identify inadmissible aliens, and to detect and deter\n immigration benefit fraud.\n\n USCIS procedures require FDNS personnel to record cases of identified immigration\n fraud in TECS. USCIS uses TECS to record cases of suspected or identified immigration\n fraud, as well as aliens inadmissible to the United States. The system is linked to DHS\n\n\n 2\n TECS, formerly called The Treasury Enforcement Communications System, is now referred to only by its\n acronym.\n\n\nwww.oig.dhs.gov 3 OIG-13-97\n\n\x0c OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL\n Department of Homeland Security\n\n law enforcement facilities worldwide and allows other Federal, State, and local entities\n to access the data.\n\n FDNS did not record all cases of identified fraud in TECS. For example, nationwide from\n fiscal year (FY) 2008 through FY 2011, USCIS denied or revoked 2,557 family-based I-130\n petitions for fraud. Of these petitions, 622 were associated with an FDNS finding of\n fraud, but 302 (49 percent) did not have corresponding TECS records. In the same period,\n at the four offices we evaluated, 6 (21 percent) of 29 family-based I-130 petitions\n associated with an FDNS finding of fraud did not have corresponding TECS records.\n\n For the same period, nationwide, USCIS denied or rescinded 2,961 family-based I-485\n applications for fraud. Of these applications, 522 were associated with an FDNS finding\n of fraud, but 247 (47 percent) did not have corresponding TECS records. A review of\n data from the same period at the four offices we evaluated showed that 3 (11 percent)\n of 28 family-based I-485 applications denied or rescinded for fraud had no TECS records.\n Table 1 shows the total number of family-based I-130 petitions and I-485 applications\n with an FDNS finding of fraud that were denied, revoked, or rescinded, as well as the\n number and percentage of corresponding TECS records.\n\n Table 1. TECS Records for Family-based Immigration Petitions and\n Applications With an FDNS Finding of Fraud That Were Denied, Revoked, or Rescinded\n FYs 2008\xe2\x80\x932011\n Petition/Application Total With FDNS TECS Record No TECS Record\n Type Finding of Fraud\n (Fraud Found)\n National I-130 622 320 (51.4%) 302 (48.6%)\n Local* I-130 29 23 (79.3%) 6 (20.7%)\n\n National I-485 522 275 (52.7%) 247 (47.3%)\n Local* I-485 28 25 (89.3%) 3 (10.7%)\n Source: DHS OIG analysis of USCIS data.\n\n *Local refers to the four offices that we evaluated.\n\n\n At the four offices we evaluated, supervisors in adjudications and FDNS units did not\n monitor database entries to determine whether fraud cases had been properly recorded.\n\n Conclusion\n Not following USCIS\xe2\x80\x99 established procedures to record, update, and monitor fraud-\n related information in databases may have increased the risk that aliens committing\n\n\n\nwww.oig.dhs.gov 4 OIG-13-97\n\n\x0c OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL\n Department of Homeland Security\n\n fraud were granted immigration benefits or given additional opportunities to apply for\n benefits. Accurate immigration and law enforcement database records would enable\n USCIS to improve its ability to track, monitor, and deter fraud.\n\n Recommendation\n We recommend that the Director, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services:\n\n Clarify and enforce policies and procedures to ensure that TECS records are created and\n updated for all identified cases of immigration benefit fraud.\n\n Management Comments and OIG Analysis\n Recommendation: USCIS concurred with the recommendation. Management indicated\n that it has (1) reviewed its existing procedural guidance that governs the creation and\n maintenance of TECS records; (2) determined that, to focus greater attention on TECS\n policies and procedures, it will remove TECS guidance from the current Fraud Detection\n Standard Operating Procedure and issue separate guidance on TECS; and (3) drafted the\n enhanced TECS guidance. USCIS plans to issue the enhanced TECS guidance within 30\n days.\n\n OIG Analysis: USCIS\xe2\x80\x99 planned corrective actions are responsive to the recommendation.\n This recommendation will remain open and resolved until we receive documented\n support that USCIS has issued the enhanced TECS guidance.\n\n\n\n\nwww.oig.dhs.gov 5 OIG-13-97\n\n\x0c OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL\n Department of Homeland Security\n\n\n Appendix A\n Objective, Scope, and Methodology\n The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Office of Inspector General (OIG) was\n established by the HomelandfSecurityfActfoff2002 (Public Law 107-296) by amendment\n to the InspectorfGeneralfActfoff1978. This is one of a series of audit, inspection, and\n special reports prepared as part of our oversight responsibilities to promote economy,\n efficiency, and effectiveness within the Department.\n\n The objective of our audit was to determine whether USCIS recorded information about\n adjudicated family-based petitions and applications suspected of being fraudulent\n according to agency policy requirements and in a manner that deterred immigration\n fraud. To accomplish our objective, we assessed USCIS\xe2\x80\x99 efforts to process, evaluate, and\n respond to family-based petitions and applications with suspected immigration benefit\n fraud that were adjudicated between October 1, 2007, and September 30, 2011.\n\n We obtained and reviewed all pertinent Federal, Departmental, and USCIS-specific\n regulations, policies, procedures, and internal controls governing the processing and\n adjudication of family-based petitions and applications.\n\n We reviewed I-130 petitions and I-485 applications denied, revoked, or rescinded by\n USCIS adjudicators between FYs 2008 and 2011 at the offices we visited. The purpose of\n the review was to determine whether the petitions, applications, and consular returns\n had been recorded according to established USCIS\xe2\x80\x99 policies. We limited USCIS office\n visits to Baltimore, MD; Mt. Laurel, NJ; Philadelphia, PA; Washington, DC; and the\n Vermont Service Center in St. Albans, VT.\n\n We relied on computer-processed USCIS data that contained information on family-\n based petitions from FYs 2008 through 2011. We conducted a limited review through\n physical observation of the process used to update these systems to ensure that the\n data were sufficiently reliable for use in meeting our audit objective. In developing our\n tests, we worked with personnel from USCIS\xe2\x80\x99 Office of Performance and Quality, Office\n of Policy and Strategy Field Operations Directorate, Service Center Operations\n Directorate, and FDNS.\n\n Tracking and Monitoring Test\n\n Positive TECS matches were based on a match of both name and date of birth for the\n petitioner, beneficiary, or applicant. Using a total of 1,838 Form I-130 and Form I-485\n receipts with a matching FDNS-DS record, we identified instances in which at least one\n\n\nwww.oig.dhs.gov 6 OIG-13-97\n\n\x0c OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL\n Department of Homeland Security\n\n of the subjects involved with the petition or application had a corresponding TECS\n record. To verify the data, we checked the date of birth used to query TECS against the\n date of birth returned with a matching name.\n\n We interviewed USCIS officials from FDNS, Service Center Operations, Field Office\n Operations, Office of Policy and Strategy, Office of Performance and Quality, Office of\n Chief Counsel, and Office of General Counsel.\n\n We conducted this performance audit between August 2011 and January 2012 pursuant\n to the InspectorfGeneralfActfoff1978, as amended, and according to generally accepted\n government auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the\n audit to obtain sufficient, appropriate evidence to provide a reasonable basis for our\n findings and conclusions based upon our audit objectives. We believe that the evidence\n obtained provides a reasonable basis for our findings and conclusions based upon our\n audit objectives.\n\n We appreciate the cooperation by USCIS management and staff in providing the\n information and access necessary to accomplish this review.\n\n\n\n\nwww.oig.dhs.gov 7 OIG-13-97\n\n\x0c OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL\n Department of Homeland Security\n\n\n Appendix B\n Management Comments to the Draft Letter Report\n\n\n\n\nwww.oig.dhs.gov 8 OIG-13-97\n\n\x0c OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL\n Department of Homeland Security\n\n\n\n\nwww.oig.dhs.gov 9 OIG-13-97\n\n\x0c OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL\n Department of Homeland Security\n\n\nAppendix \x12\nReport Distribution\nDepartment of Homeland Security\n\nSecretary\nDeputy Secretary\nChief of Staff\nDeputy Chief of Staff\nGeneral Counsel\nExecutive Secretary\nDirector, GAO/OIG Liaison Office\nAssistant Secretary for Office of Policy\nAssistant Secretary for Office of Public Affairs\nAssistant Secretary for Office of Legislative Affairs\nActing Chief Privacy Officer\n\nU.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services\n\nUSCIS Audit Liaison\n\nOffice of Management and Budget\n\nChief, Homeland Security Branch\nDHS OIG Budget Examiner\n\nCongress\n\nCongressional Oversight and Appropriations Committees, as appropriate\n\n\n\n\nwww.oig.dhs.gov 10 OIG-13-97\n\x0cADDITIONAL INFORMATION AND COPIES\n\nTo obtain additional copies of this document, please call us at (202) 254-4100, fax your\nrequest to (202) 254-4305, or e-mail your request to our Office of Inspector General\n(OIG) Office of Public Affairs at: DHS-OIG.OfficePublicAffairs@oig.dhs.gov.\n\nFor additional information, visit our website at: www.oig.dhs.gov, or follow us on Twitter\nat: @dhsoig.\n\nOIG HOTLINE\n\nTo expedite the reporting of alleged fraud, waste, abuse or mismanagement, or any\nother kinds of criminal or noncriminal misconduct relative to Department of Homeland\nSecurity (DHS) programs and operations, please visit our website at www.oig.dhs.gov\nand click on the red tab titled "Hotline" to report. You will be directed to complete and\nsubmit an automated DHS OIG Investigative Referral Submission Form. Submission\nthrough our website ensures that your complaint will be promptly received and\nreviewed by DHS OIG.\n\nShould you be unable to access our website, you may submit your complaint in writing\nto: DHS Office of Inspector General, Attention: Office of Investigations Hotline, 245\nMurray Drive, SW, Building 410/Mail Stop 2600, Washington, DC, 20528; or you may\ncall 1 (800) 323-8603; or fax it directly to us at (202) 254-4297.\n\nThe OIG seeks to protect the identity of each writer and caller.\n\x0c'


text:
24.1.2004 EL Επίσημη Εφημερίδα της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης C 21/1
 I
 (Ανακοινώσεις)
 ∆ΙΚΑΣΤΗΡΙΟ
 ∆ΙΚΑΣΤΗΡΙΟ
 Ορκομωσία νέου μέλους του ∆ικαστηρίου Πίνακες που χρησιμεύουν για τον προσδιορισμό της συν-
 θέσεως των δικαιοδοτικών τμημάτων
 (2004/C 21/01)
 (2004/C 21/03)
 Ο K. Schiemann, ο οποίος διορίστηκε δικαστής στο ∆ικαστήριο Κατά τη σύσκεψή του της 13ης Ιανουαρίου 2004 το ∆ικαστήριο
 των Ευρωπαϊκών Κοινοτήτων με την απόφαση των αντιπροσώπων συνέταξε τον πίνακα περί του οποίου γίνεται λόγος στο άρθρο
 των Κυβερνήσεων των κρατών μελών των Ευρωπαϊκών Κοινοτήτων 11β, παράγραφος 2, του Κανονισμού ∆ιαδικασίας, σχετικά με τον
 της 23ης Οκτωβρίου 2003 (1), ορκίστηκε ενώπιον του ∆ικαστη- προσδιορισμό του τμήματος μείζονος συνθέσεως, ως ακολούθως:
 ρίου στις 7 Ιανουαρίου 2004.
 — C. Gulmann
 — K. Schiemann
 (1) ΕΕ L 285 της 1.11.2003, σ. 42.
 — A. La Pergola
 — K. Lenaerts
 — J.-P. Puissochet
 — R. Silva de Lapuerta
 Τοποθέτηση νέου δικαστή στα τμήματα
 — R. Schintgen
 (2004/C 21/02) — A. Rosas
 — F. Macken
 Κατά τη σύσκεψη της 13ης Ιανουαρίου 2004, το ∆ικαστήριο — J. N. Cunha Rodrigues
 των Ευρωπαϊκών Κοινοτήτων αποφάσισε την τοποθέτηση του K.
 Schiemann στο πρώτο και το τρίτο τμήμα. — N. Colneric
 — S. von Bahr
 Κατά συνέπεια, η σύνθεση του πρώτου και του τρίτου τμήματος Κατά τη σύσκεψή του της 13ης Ιανουαρίου 2004 το ∆ικαστήριο
 έχει ως ακολούθως. κατάρτισε τους πίνακες περί των οποίων γίνεται λόγος στο
 άρθρο 11γ, παράγραφος 2, του Κανονισμού ∆ιαδικασίας για τον
 Πρώτο τμήμα προσδιορισμό της συνθέσεως του πρώτου και του τρίτου τμήματος
 ως ακολούθως:
 P. Jann, πρόεδρος τμήματος,
 Πρώτο τμήμα
 και Α. Rosas, A. La Pergola, S. von Bahr, R. Silva de Lapuerta,
 K. Lenaerts και K. Schiemann, δικαστές. — A. La Pergola
 — K. Schiemann
 Τρίτο τμήμα
 — S. von Bahr
 A. Rosas, πρόεδρος τμήματος,
 — K. Lenaerts
 και R. Schintgen, N. Colneric και K. Schiemann, δικαστές. — A. Rosas
 — R. Silva de Lapuerta


text:
 |
 52013PC0736
 Prijedlog ODLUKE VIJEĆA o financijskim doprinosima koje trebaju platiti države članice radi financiranja Europskog fonda za razvoj, uključujući gornju granicu za 2015., iznos za 2014. i prvi obrok za 2014. /* COM/2013/0736 final - 2013/0352 (NLE) */
 OBRAZLOŽENJE
 1. KONTEKST PRIJEDLOGA
 Unutarnjim sporazumom i Financijskom uredbom o
 Desetom ERF-u predviđa se postupak za pozive na doprinose koje države
 članice trebaju platiti radi financiranja ERF-a. U skladu s člankom 57.
 stavkom 2. Financijske uredbe o Desetom ERF-u, ovim se prijedlogom
 obuhvaća:
 –
 gornja granica godišnjeg iznosa doprinosa za 2015.;
 –
 godišnji iznos za 2014.;
 –
 iznos prvog obroka doprinosa za 2014.
 2. PRAVNI ELEMENTI PRIJEDLOGA
 U skladu s člankom 57. stavkom 2. Financijske
 uredbe o Desetom ERF-u, Vijeće o ovom prijedlogu mora odlučiti do 15.
 studenoga 2013., a države članice moraju platiti prvi obrok doprinosa
 najkasnije do 21. siječnja 2014.
 U skladu s člankom 57. stavkom 7. Financijske
 uredbe o Desetom ERF-u, utvrđen je iznos kojim upravlja Komisija i iznos
 kojim upravlja EIB.
 U skladu s člankom 58. stavkom 2. Financijske
 uredbe o Desetom ERF-u pozivima na doprinose najprije treba iskoristiti iznose
 raspoložive iz prethodnih ERF-ova, jedan za drugim. S obzirom na to da EIB za
 prvi obrok ne poziva na dostavljanje doprinosa, ovaj se prijedlog
 isključivo odnosi na iznose određene u okviru Desetog ERF-a za
 Komisiju.
 U skladu s člankom 145. Financijske uredbe o
 Desetom ERF-u, EIB je Komisiji poslao svoje ažurirane procjene obveza i
 plaćanja u okviru instrumenata kojima upravlja.
 U skladu s člankom 60. Financijske uredbe o
 Desetom ERF-u od države članice koja ne plati obrok doprinosa do
 određenog roka zahtijeva se plaćanje kamata na neplaćeni iznos.
 U istom su članku utvrđeni i načini plaćanja kamata.
 2013/0352 (NLE)
 Prijedlog
 ODLUKE VIJEĆA
 o financijskim doprinosima koje trebaju
 platiti države članice radi financiranja Europskog fonda za razvoj,
 uključujući gornju granicu za 2015., iznos za 2014. i prvi obrok za
 2014.
 VIJEĆE EUROPSKE UNIJE,
 uzimajući u obzir Ugovor o funkcioniranju
 Europske unije,
 uzimajući u obzir Unutarnji sporazum
 između predstavnika vlada država članica, koji su se sastali u
 Vijeću, o financiranju potpore Zajednice u okviru višegodišnjeg
 financijskog okvira za razdoblje od 2008. do 2013. u skladu sa Sporazumom o
 partnerstvu između država AKP-a i država EZ-a i o dodjeljivanju
 financijske pomoći prekomorskim zemljama i područjima na koja se
 primjenjuje četvrti dio Ugovora o EZ-u, a posebno njegov članak 7.,
 uzimajući u obzir Uredbu Vijeća (EZ)
 br. 215/2008 od 18. veljače 2008. o Financijskoj uredbi koja se
 primjenjuje na Deseti Europski razvojni fond (dalje u tekstu „Financijska
 uredba o Desetom ERF-u”), a posebno njezin članak 57. stavak 5.,
 uzimajući u obzir prijedlog Europske komisije,
 budući da:
 (1) U skladu s postupkom
 utvrđenim člancima 57. do 61. Financijske uredbe o Desetom ERF-u,
 Komisija bi trebala predstaviti prijedlog do 15. listopada 2013. kojim se
 utvrđuje gornja granica godišnjeg iznosa doprinosa država članica
 Europskog fonda za razvoj za 2015., iznosa doprinosa za 2014. i iznosa prvog
 obroka doprinosa za 2014.
 (2) U skladu s člankom 145.
 stavkom 1. Financijske uredbe o Desetom ERF-u, Europska investicijska banka je
 Komisiji poslala svoje ažurirane procjene obveza i plaćanja u okviru
 instrumenata kojima upravlja.
 (3) U skladu s člankom 58.
 stavkom 2. Financijske uredbe o Desetom ERF-u pozivima na doprinose najprije
 treba iskoristiti iznose raspoložive iz prethodnih ERF-ova, jedan za drugim. S
 obzirom na to da EIB za prvi obrok ne poziva na dostavljanje doprinosa, ovaj se
 prijedlog isključivo odnosi na iznose određene u okviru Desetog ERF-a
 za Komisiju.
 (4) Vijeće je 19. studenoga 2012.
 na prijedlog Komisije donijelo odluku da udjel Komisije u gornjoj granici
 doprinosa država članica ERF-u za 2014. odredi na iznos od 3 250 000 000
 EUR, a udjel EIB-a na 360 000 000 EUR.
 DONIJELO JE OVU ODLUKU:
 Članak 1.
 Gornja granica godišnjeg iznosa doprinosa
 država članica ERF-u za 2015. ovime je za Komisiju utvrđena na 3 300 000 000
 EUR te na 300 000 000 EUR za Europsku investicijsku banku.
 Članak 2.
 Godišnji iznos doprinosa država članica
 ERF-u za 2014. ovime je za Komisiju utvrđen na 3 100 000 000
 EUR te na 150 000 000 EUR za Europsku investicijsku banku.
 Članak 3.
 Pojedinačni doprinosi koje Komisiji i
 Europskoj investicijskoj banci kao prvi obrok za 2014. trebaju platiti države
 članice određeni su u tablici u Prilogu.
 Članak 4.
 Ova je Odluka upućena državama
 članicama.
 Sastavljeno u Bruxellesu
 Za
 Vijeće
 Predsjednik
 PRILOG
 Prvi obrok doprinosa za ERF za 2014. (u
 tisućama EUR)
 || || Ključni % || Ključni % || Prvi obrok
 || || za Deveti || za Deseti || plaćeno || plaćeno
 || DRŽAVE ČLANICE || ERF || ERF || EIB-u || Komisiji
 || || % || % || Deveti ERF || Deseti ERF
 || BELGIJA || 3,92 || 3,53 || 0 || 70 600
 || DANSKA || 2,14 || 2,00 || 0 || 40 000
 || NJEMAČKA || 23,36 || 20,50 || 0 || 410 000
 || GRČKA || 1,25 || 1,47 || 0 || 29 400
 || ŠPANJOLSKA || 5,84 || 7,85 || 0 || 157 000
 || FRANCUSKA || 24,30 || 19,55 || 0 || 391 000
 || IRSKA || 0,62 || 0,91 || 0 || 18 200
 || ITALIJA || 12,54 || 12,86 || 0 || 257 200
 || LUKSEMBURG || 0,29 || 0,27 || 0 || 5 400
 || NIZOZEMSKA || 5,22 || 4,85 || 0 || 97 000
 || AUSTRIJA || 2,65 || 2,41 || 0 || 48 200
 || PORTUGAL || 0,97 || 1,15 || 0 || 23 000
 || FINSKA || 1,48 || 1,47 || 0 || 29 400
 || ŠVEDSKA || 2,73 || 2,74 || 0 || 54 800
 || UJEDINJENA KRALJEVINA || 12,69 || 14,82 || 0 || 296 400
 || Međuzbroj EUR-15 || 100 || 96,38 || 0 || 1 927 600
 || BUGARSKA || || 0,14 || || 2 800
 || ČEŠKA REPUBLIKA || || 0,51 || || 10 200
 || ESTONIJA || || 0,05 || || 1 000
 || CIPAR || || 0,09 || || 1 800
 || LATVIJA || || 0,07 || || 1 400
 || LITVA || || 0,12 || || 2 400
 || MAĐARSKA || || 0,55 || || 11 000
 || MALTA || || 0,03 || || 600
 || POLJSKA || || 1,30 || || 26 000
 || RUMUNJSKA || || 0,37 || || 7 400
 || Litva || || 0,18 || || 3 600
 || SLOVAČKA || || 0,21 || || 4 200
 || Međuzbroj EUR-12 || || 3,62 || || 72 400
 || UKUPNO EUR-27 || 100 || 100 || || 2 000 000


text:
 17.7.2014
 SL
 Uradni list Evropske unije
 L 211/16
 SKLEP SKUPNEGA ODBORA EGP
 št. 10/2014
 z dne 14. februarja 2014
 o spremembi Priloge II (Tehnični predpisi, standardi, preskušanje in certificiranje) k Sporazumu EGP
 SKUPNI ODBOR EGP JE –
 ob upoštevanju Sporazuma o Evropskem gospodarskem prostoru (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Sporazum EGP) in zlasti člena 98 Sporazuma EGP,
 ob upoštevanju naslednjega:
 (1)
 Direktivo Komisije 2013/46/EU z dne 28. avgusta 2013 o spremembi Direktive 2006/141/ES v zvezi z zahtevami glede beljakovin za začetne formule za dojenčke ter nadaljevalne formule za dojenčke in majhne otroke (1) je treba vključiti v Sporazum EGP.
 (2)
 Ta sklep zadeva zakonodajo v zvezi z živili. Zakonodaja v zvezi z živili se ne uporablja za Lihtenštajn, dokler se Sporazum med Evropsko skupnostjo in Švicarsko konfederacijo o trgovini s kmetijskimi proizvodi uporablja tudi za Lihtenštajn, kakor je navedeno v uvodu k poglavju XII Priloge II k Sporazumu EGP. Ta sklep se zato ne uporablja za Lihtenštajn.
 (3)
 Prilogo II k Sporazumu EGP bi bilo zato treba ustrezno spremeniti –
 SPREJEL NASLEDNJI SKLEP:
 Člen 1
 V točki 54zzzv (Direktiva Komisije 2006/141/ES) poglavja XII Priloge II k Sporazumu EGP se doda naslednja alinea:
 „—
 32013 L 0046: Direktiva Komisije 2013/46/EU z dne 28. avgusta 2013 (UL L 230, 29.8.2013, str. 16).“
 Člen 2
 Besedilo Direktive 2013/46/EU v islandskem in norveškem jeziku, ki se objavi v Dopolnilu EGP k Uradnemu listu Evropske unije, je verodostojno.
 Člen 3
 Ta sklep začne veljati 15. februarja 2014 pod pogojem, da so bila predložena vsa uradna obvestila v skladu s členom 103(1) Sporazuma EGP (2).
 Člen 4
 Ta sklep se objavi v sklopu EGP Uradnega lista Evropske unije in Dopolnilu EGP k Uradnemu listu Evropske unije.
 V Bruslju, 14. februarja 2014
 Za Skupni odbor EGP
 Predsednik
 Gianluca GRIPPA
 (1) UL L 230, 29.8.2013, str. 16.
 (2) Navedena ni nobena ustavna zahteva.


text:
 22.6.2017
 FR
 Journal officiel de l'Union européenne
 L 161/45
 DÉCISION DU COMITÉ MIXTE DE L'EEE
 No 263/2015
 du 30 octobre 2015
 modifiant l'annexe II (Réglementations techniques, normes, essais et certification) de l'accord EEE [2017/1052]
 LE COMITÉ MIXTE DE L'EEE,
 vu l'accord sur l'Espace économique européen (ci-après l'«accord EEE»), et notamment son article 98,
 considérant ce qui suit:
 (1)
 Le règlement d'exécution (UE) 2015/762 de la Commission du 12 mai 2015 portant approbation de la substance de base «hydroxyde de calcium» conformément au règlement (CE) no 1107/2009 du Parlement européen et du Conseil concernant la mise sur le marché des produits phytopharmaceutiques, et modifiant l'annexe du règlement d'exécution (UE) no 540/2011 de la Commission (1) doit être intégré dans l'accord EEE.
 (2)
 Il convient dès lors de modifier l'annexe II de l'accord EEE en conséquence,
 A ADOPTÉ LA PRÉSENTE DÉCISION:
 Article premier
 Le chapitre XV de l'annexe II de l'accord EEE est modifié comme suit:
 1)
 Le tiret suivant est ajouté au point 13a [règlement d'exécution (UE) no 540/2011 de la Commission]:
 «—
 32015 R 0762: règlement d'exécution (UE) 2015/762 de la Commission du 12 mai 2015 (JO L 120 du 13.5.2015, p. 6).»
 2)
 Le point suivant est inséré après le point 13zzzzu [règlement d'exécution (UE) 2015/707 de la Commission]:
 «13zzzzv.
 32015 R 0762: règlement d'exécution (UE) 2015/762 de la Commission du 12 mai 2015 portant approbation de la substance de base «hydroxyde de calcium» conformément au règlement (CE) no 1107/2009 du Parlement européen et du Conseil concernant la mise sur le marché des produits phytopharmaceutiques, et modifiant l'annexe du règlement d'exécution (UE) no 540/2011 de la Commission (JO L 120 du 13.5.2015, p. 6).»
 Article 2
 Les textes du règlement d'exécution (UE) 2015/762 en langues islandaise et norvégienne, à publier dans le supplément EEE du Journal officiel de l'Union européenne, font foi.
 Article 3
 La présente décision entre en vigueur le 1er novembre 2015, pour autant que toutes les notifications prévues à l'article 103, paragraphe 1, de l'accord EEE aient été faites (*1).
 Article 4
 La présente décision est publiée dans la partie EEE et dans le supplément EEE du Journal officiel de l'Union européenne.
 Fait à Bruxelles, le 30 octobre 2015.
 Par le Comité mixte de l'EEE
 La présidente
 Oda SLETNES
 (1) JO L 120 du 13.5.2015, p. 6.
 (*1) Pas d'obligations constitutionnelles signalées.


text:
 5.7.2008
 SL
 Uradni list Evropske unije
 C 171/16
 Predlog za sprejetje predhodne odločbe, ki ga je vložilo Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Madrid (Španija) 15. aprila 2008 – Real Sociedad de Fútbol S.A.D. in Nihat Kahveci proti Consejo Superior de Deportes in Real Federación Española de Fútbol
 (Zadeva C-152/08)
 (2008/C 171/28)
 Jezik postopka: španščina
 Predložitveno sodišče
 Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Madrid.
 Stranke v postopku v glavni stvari
 Pritožnika: Real Sociedad de Fútbol S.A.D. in Nihat Kahveci
 Drugi stranki: Consejo Superior de Deportes in Real Federación Española de Fútbol
 Vprašanje za predhodno odločanje
 Ali je v nasprotju s členom 37 Pridružitvenega sporazuma EGS-Turčija (1), podpisanega v Ankari 12. septembra 1963, ki ga je Evropski Svet sprejel z Sklepom Sveta 64/732/EGS z dne 23. decembra 1963, in Dodatnim protokolom k sporazumu z dne 23. novembra 1970 (2), da športna federacija za poklicnega športnika, ki ima turško državljanstvo in ki je redno zaposlen v španskem nogometnem klubu, kot je ta iz spora v glavni stvari, uporabi predpis, v skladu s katerim lahko klubi v tekmovanjih na državni ravni uporabijo le omejeno število igralcev iz tretjih držav, ki niso vključene v Evropski gospodarski prostor?
 (1) Sporazumu o pridružitvi med Evropsko gospodarsko skupnostjo in Turčijo, podpisan 12. septembra 1963 v Ankari, in ki je bil sklenjen, odobren in potrjen v imenu Skupnosti s Sklepom Sveta 64/732/EGS z dne 23. decembra 1963 (UL 1964, 217, str. 3685).
 (2) Dodatni protokol k Pridružitvenemu sporazumu med Evropsko gospodarsko skupnostjo in Turčijo, podpisan 23. novembra 1970 v Bruslju, in sklenjen, odobren in potrjen v imenu Skupnosti z Uredbo Sveta (EGS) št. 2760/72 z dne 19. decembra 1972 (UL L 293, str. 1).