jurisdiction: US

text: b' U.S. Department of Agriculture\n Office of Inspector General\n Financial Audit Operations\n\n\n\n\n Statement on Standards for Attestation\nEngagements No. 16 Report on Controls at the\n National Information Technology Center\n\n\n\n\n Report 88501-1-11\n September 2011\n\x0c United States Department of Agriculture\n Office of Inspector General\n Washington, D.C. 20250\n\n\n\n\nDATE: September 19, 2011\n\nAUDIT\nNUMBER: 88501-1-11\n\nTO: Christopher L. Smith\n Chief Information Officer\n Office of the Chief Information Officer\n\nATTN: Sherry Linkins\n Information Resources Management\n\nFROM: Gil H. Harden /s/\n Assistant Inspector General\n for Audit\n\nSUBJECT: Statement on Standards for Attestation Engagements No. 16 Report on Controls at\n the National Information Technology Center\n\n\nThis report presents the results of our Statement on Standards for Attestation Engagements\n(SSAE) No. 16 examination for the Office of the Chief Information Officer/National Information\nTechnology Center (OCIO/NITC) (formerly referred to as our Statement on Auditing Standards\nNo. 70 [SAS 70] audit at the OCIO/NITC). Our examination was conducted in accordance with\nGovernment Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, and\nrelevant attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public\nAccountants. This report contains the OCIO/NITC systems description and OCIO/NITC\nmanagement\xe2\x80\x99s assertion about whether the description is fairly presented and whether controls are\nsuitably designed and operating effectively to achieve control objectives stated in the description.\nAdditionally, the report includes our unqualified opinion on OCIO/NITC\xe2\x80\x99s controls based on the criteria\ndescribed in its assertion. Furthermore, the report does not contain recommendations. The\nprojection of any conclusions based on our examination findings to future periods are subject to\nthe risk that changes may alter the validity of such conclusions. This report is intended solely for\nthe management of OCIO/NITC, its customer agencies, and their auditors.\n\nWe appreciate the courtesies and cooperation extended to us by members of your staff during\nthis engagement.\n\x0cTable of Contents\n\nExecutive Summary .................................................................................................1\nIndependent Service Auditors\xe2\x80\x99 Report ..................................................................2\nAbbreviations ...........................................................................................................5\nExhibit A: Office of the Chief Information Officer/National Information\nTechnology Center \xe2\x80\x93 Management\xe2\x80\x99s Systems Description..................................6\nExhibit B: Office of the Chief Information Officer/National Information\nTechnology Center \xe2\x80\x93 Management\xe2\x80\x99s Assertion ..................................................37\nExhibit C: Office of Inspector General Tests of the Office of the Chief\nInformation Officer/National Information Technology Center Controls ........39\n\x0cExecutive Summary\nStatement on Standards for Attestation Engagements No. 16 Report on Controls at the\nNational Information Technology Center (Report 88501-1-11)\n\nResults in Brief\nThis report presents the results of our Statement on Standards for Attestation Engagements\nNo. 16 examination for the Office of the Chief Information Officer/National Information\nTechnology Center (OCIO/NITC). Our examination was conducted in accordance with\nGovernment Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, and\nrelevant attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public\nAccountants.\n\nOCIO/NITC provided us with a description of its systems for the period from July 1, 2010, to\nJune 30, 2011, included as exhibit A, and an assertion, included as exhibit B, about the fair\npresentation of the description and suitability of the design and operating effectiveness of the\ncontrols to achieve the related control objectives stated in its description. Our objectives were to\nobtain reasonable assurance about whether, in all material respects, based on suitable criteria, (1)\nmanagement\xe2\x80\x99s description of OCIO/NITC systems fairly presents the systems that were designed\nand implemented throughout the period specified in the description; (2) the controls related to the\ncontrol objectives stated in the description of OCIO/NITC systems were suitably designed\nthroughout the specified period; and (3) the controls operated effectively to provide reasonable\nassurance that the control objectives stated in the description of OCIO/NITC systems were\nachieved throughout the specified period.\n\nIn our opinion, in all material respects, based on the criteria described in OCIO/NITC\xe2\x80\x99s\nassertion, the description fairly presents OCIO/NITC systems that were designed and\nimplemented throughout the period from July 1, 2010, to June 30, 2011. Also, in our opinion,\nthe controls included in the description were suitably designed and operating effectively to\nprovide reasonable assurance that the associated control objectives would be achieved from\nJuly 1, 2010, to June 30, 2011, if user entities effectively applied the complementary controls\ncontemplated in the design of OCIO/NITC controls throughout this period.\n\nRecommendation Summary\nWe do not make any recommendations in this report.\n\n\n\n\nReport 88501-1-11 1\n\x0cIndependent Service Auditors\xe2\x80\x99 Report\nTo: Christopher L. Smith\n Chief Information Officer\n Office of the Chief Information Officer\n\nScope\nWe have examined the Department of Agriculture\xe2\x80\x99s Office of the Chief Information\nOfficer/National Information Technology Center (OCIO/NITC) description of its general support\nsystems1 and eAuthentication application made available to user entities for processing their\ntransactions throughout the period from July 1, 2010, to June 30, 2011, included as exhibit A,\nand the suitability of the design and operating effectiveness of the controls to achieve the related\ncontrol objectives stated in the description. The description indicates that OCIO/NITC\nconsidered complementary user entity controls in the design of OCIO/NITC controls. We did\nnot evaluate the suitability of the design or operating effectiveness of such complementary user\nentity controls.\n\nOCIO/NITC used subservice organizations for data sanitization, disaster recovery, web farm\nsupport, and network and internet connectivity. The description in exhibit A includes only the\ncontrols and related control objectives of OCIO/NITC and excludes the control objectives and\nrelated controls of the specified subservice organizations. Our examination did not extend to\ncontrols of the subservice organizations specified by OCIO/NITC.\n\nOCIO/NITC\xe2\x80\x99s Responsibilities\nOCIO/NITC has provided an assertion, included as exhibit B, about the fair presentation of the\ndescription and the suitability of the design and operating effectiveness of the controls to achieve\nthe related control objectives stated in its description, included as exhibit A. OCIO/NITC is\nresponsible for preparing the description and for the assertion, including the completeness,\naccuracy, and method of presentation of the description and the assertion; providing the services\ncovered by the description; specifying the control objectives and stating them in the description;\nidentifying the risks that threaten the achievement of the control objectives; selecting the criteria;\nand designing, implementing, and documenting controls to achieve the related control objectives\nstated in the description.\n\nOffice of Inspector General\xe2\x80\x99s Responsibilities\nOur responsibility is to express an opinion on the fairness of the presentation of the description\nand the suitability of the design and operating effectiveness of the controls to achieve the related\ncontrol objectives stated in the description, based on our examination. We conducted our\nexamination in accordance with Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller\nGeneral of the United States, and relevant attestation standards established by the American\nInstitute of Certified Public Accountants. Those standards require that we plan and perform our\n\n1\n As shown in the OCIO/NITC description included as exhibit A, those systems are the Mainframe,\nTelecommunications Network, and Infrastructure Support System.\n\nReport 88501-1-11 2\n\x0cexamination to obtain reasonable assurance about whether, in all material respects, the\ndescription is fairly presented and the controls were suitably designed and operating effectively\nto achieve the related control objectives stated in the description throughout the period from\nJuly 1, 2010, to June 30, 2011.\n\nAn examination of a description of a service organization\xe2\x80\x99s systems and the suitability of the\ndesign and operating effectiveness of the service organization\xe2\x80\x99s controls to achieve the related\ncontrol objectives stated in the description involves performing procedures to obtain evidence\nabout the fairness of presentation of the description and the suitability of the design and\noperating effectiveness of those controls to achieve the related control objectives stated in the\ndescription. Our procedures included assessing the risks that the description is not fairly\npresented and that the controls were not suitably designed or operating effectively to achieve the\nrelated control objectives stated in the description. Our procedures also included testing the\noperating effectiveness of those controls that we consider necessary to provide reasonable\nassurance that the related control objectives stated in the description were achieved. An\nexamination engagement of this type also includes evaluating the overall presentation of the\ndescription and the suitability of the control objectives stated therein, and the suitability of the\ncriteria specified by the service organization and described in exhibit A. We believe that the\nevidence we obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.\n\nInherent Limitations\nBecause of their nature, controls at a service organization may not prevent, or detect and correct,\nall errors or omissions in supporting user entities\xe2\x80\x99 applications or transactions. Also, the\nprojection to the future of any evaluation of the fairness of presentation of the description, or\nconclusions about the suitability of the design or operating effectiveness of the controls to\nachieve the related control objectives is subject to the risk that controls at a service organization\nmay become inadequate or fail.\n\nOpinion\nIn our opinion, in all material respects, based on the criteria described in OCIO/NITC\xe2\x80\x99s assertion\nin exhibit B:\n\n \xc2\xb7 The description fairly presents the OCIO/NITC general support systems and\n eAuthentication application that were designed and implemented throughout the period\n from July 1, 2010, to June 30, 2011.\n\n \xc2\xb7 The controls related to the control objectives stated in the description were suitably\n designed to provide reasonable assurance that the control objectives would be achieved if\n the controls operated effectively throughout the period from July 1, 2010, to June 30,\n 2011, and user entities applied the complementary controls contemplated in the design of\n OCIO/NITC controls throughout the period from July 1, 2010, to June 30, 2011.\n\n\n\n\nReport 88501-1-11 3\n\x0c \xc2\xb7 The controls tested, which were those OCIO/NITC controls necessary to provide\n reasonable assurance that the control objectives stated in the description were achieved2,\n operated effectively throughout the period from July 1, 2010, to June 30, 2011.\n\nDescription of Tests of Controls\nThe specific controls tested and the nature, timing, and results of those tests are included in\nexhibit C.\n\nRestricted Use\nThis report, including the description of tests of controls and results thereof in exhibit C, is\nintended solely for the information and use of OCIO/NITC, user entities of OCIO/NITC support\nsystems during some or all of the period from July 1, 2010, to June 30, 2011, and the\nindependent auditors of such user entities, who have a sufficient understanding to consider it,\nalong with other information including information about controls implemented by user entities\nthemselves, when assessing the risks of material misstatements of user entities\xe2\x80\x99 financial\nstatements. This report is not intended to be and should not be used by anyone other than these\nspecified parties.\n\n\n\n\nGil H. Harden /s/\nAssistant Inspector General\n for Audit\n\nSeptember 14, 2011\n\nWashington, D.C.\n\n\n\n\n2\n In addition to the OCIO/NITC controls we tested, the effective application of the complementary user entity\ncontrols referred to in the scope paragraph of this report is necessary to achieve the related control objectives.\n\nReport 88501-1-11 4\n\x0cAbbreviations\nC&A certification and accreditation\nCSAM Cyber Security Assessment and Management\neAuth eAuthentication\nFIPS Federal Information Processing Standards\nIS Information System\nIT Information Technology\nNIST National Institute of Standards and Technology\nNITC National Information Technology Center\nOCIO Office of the Chief Information Officer\nPOA&M Plan of Action & Milestones\nSDLC System Development Life Cycle\nSSP System Security Plan\nUSDA Department of Agriculture\n\n\n\n\nReport 88501-1-11 5\n\x0cThe subsequent sections of the report exhibit A (pages 6\nthrough 36), exhibit B (pages 37 through 38), and exhibit C\n(pages 39 through 56) are not being publicly released due to\nthe sensitive security content.\n\x0c'


type: wikipedia

text:
Is cathair í Nürnberg i ndeisceart na Gearmáine. Tá sé suite i gceantar na Francóine sa Bhaváir (Bayern).
 Tá clú agus cáil ar an áit mar an chathair ina reachtaíodh Dlíthe Nürnberg, a choisc ar na Giúdaigh daoine "Airianacha" a phósadh agus a bhain saoránacht na Gearmáine díobh le linn ré Adolf Hitler, agus an áit inar tharla Triail Nürnberg, nuair a cuireadh ceannairí na Naitsithe chun báis agus an Dara Cogadh Domhanda caillte acu.
 Cathracha na Gearmáine
 An Bhaváir


type: caselaw

jurisdiction: EU

text:
 7.3.2009
 HU
 Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja
 C 55/25
 Az Elsőfokú Bíróság 2008. december 17-i végzése – Portela kontra Bizottság
 (T-137/07. sz. ügy) (1)
 („Szerződésen kívüli felelősség - »CE« jelöléssel ellátott, hibás digitális hőmérők forgalomba hozatala - A Bizottság tétlensége - Okozati kapcsolat - Részben nyilvánvalóan elfogadhatatlan, részben pedig jogilag nyilvánvalóan megalapozatlan kereset’)
 (2009/C 55/46)
 Az eljárás nyelve: portugál
 Felek
 Felperes: Portela – Comércio de artigos ortopédicos e hospitalares, Lda, (Queluz, Portugália) (képviselő: C. Mourato ügyvéd)
 Alperes: az Európai Közösségek Bizottsága (képviselők: P. Guerra e Andrade és B. Schima meghatalmazottak)
 Az ügy tárgya
 Elsődlegesen a Bizottság arra való kötelezése iránti kérelem, hogy cselekedjék az in vitro diagnosztikai orvostechnikai eszközökről szóló, 1998. október 27-i 98/79/EK európai parlamenti és tanácsi irányelvvel (HL L 1998. L 331., 1. o.; magyar nyelvű különkiadás 13. fejezet, 21. kötet, 319. o.) módosított, az orvostechnikai eszközökről szóló, 1993. június 14-i 93/42/EGK tanácsi irányelv (HL L 169., 1. o.; magyar nyelvű különkiadás 13. fejezet, 12. kötet, 82. o.) 14b. cikkében rendeltekkel összhangban, és kötelezze a Németországi Szövetségi Köztársaságon keresztül a TÜV Rheinland Product Safety GmbH tanúsító társaságot arra, hogy a 93/42 irányelv XI. mellékletének 6. pontjában előírt kötelező felelősségbiztosítást révén, amelyet az említett társaság kötött, fizessen kártérítést a felperes javára, és amennyiben az állítólagos kár nem téríthető meg az elsődleges követelés keretében, másodlagosan a felperes által a Bizottság különböző mulasztásai miatt elszenvedett károk tekintetében kártérítés iránti kérelem
 A végzés rendelkező része
 1)
 Az Elsőfokú Bíróság a keresetet elutasítja.
 2)
 Az Elsőfokú Bíróság a Portela – Comércio de artigos ortopédicos e hospitalares, Lda -t kötelezi a költségek viselésére.
 (1) HL C 155., 2007.7.7.


type: legislation

text:
 3.3.2012
 FR
 Journal officiel de l'Union européenne
 L 64/7
 DIRECTIVE 2012/7/UE DE LA COMMISSION
 du 2 mars 2012
 modifiant, pour l’adapter au progrès technique, l’annexe II, partie III, de la directive 2009/48/CE du Parlement européen et du Conseil relative à la sécurité des jouets
 (Texte présentant de l'intérêt pour l'EEE)
 LA COMMISSION EUROPÉENNE,
 vu le traité sur le fonctionnement de l’Union européenne,
 vu la directive 2009/48/CE du Parlement européen et du Conseil du 18 juin 2009 relative à la sécurité de jouets (1), et notamment son article 46, paragraphe 1, point b),
 considérant ce qui suit:
 (1)
 La directive 2009/48 établit des valeurs limites pour le cadmium, à partir des recommandations de l’Institut néerlandais pour la santé publique et l’environnement (RIVM) présentées dans le rapport 2008 intitulé «Chemicals in Toys. A general methodology for assessment of chemical safety of toys with a focus on elements». Les recommandations du RIVM s’appuient sur l’hypothèse selon laquelle l’exposition des enfants aux produits chimiques présents dans les jouets ne doit pas dépasser un certain niveau, appelé «dose journalière acceptable». Les enfants étant exposés à des produits chimiques contenus dans des sources autres que les jouets, seul un pourcentage de la dose journalière acceptable devrait être associé aux jouets. Le comité scientifique de la toxicité, de l’écotoxicité et de l’environnement (CSTEE) a recommandé, dans son rapport 2004, qu’au maximum 10 % de la dose journalière acceptable soient associés aux jouets. Cependant, pour le cadmium et d’autres substances chimiques particulièrement toxiques, il est recommandé que le taux associé aux jouets n’excède pas 5 % de la dose journalière acceptable afin d’assurer que seules des traces compatibles avec de bonnes pratiques de fabrication puissent être présentes.
 (2)
 D’après les recommandations du RIVM, le pourcentage maximal de la dose journalière acceptable devrait être multiplié par le poids d’un enfant, estimé à 7,5 kg, et divisé par la quantité de matière de jouet ingérée, pour obtenir les valeurs limites pour les substances chimiques figurant dans la directive 2009/48/CE.
 (3)
 Pour le cadmium, le RIVM a utilisé la dose hebdomadaire acceptable de 7 μg/kg, établie par le comité mixte FAO-OMS d’experts des additifs alimentaires (JECFA) en 1989 et confirmée par ce même comité en 2001. Un facteur de sécurité de deux a été appliqué, ce qui abaisse la dose hebdomadaire acceptable à 3,5 μg/kg et la dose journalière acceptable à 0,5 μg/kg.
 (4)
 Afin d’établir les scénarios possibles d’exposition aux substances chimiques, la quantité de matière de jouet ingérée a été estimée par le RIVM à 8 mg par jour pour la matière grattée du jouet, à 100 mg pour la matière de jouet friable et à 400 mg pour la matière de jouet liquide ou collante. Ces limites d’ingestion ont été soutenues par le comité scientifique des risques sanitaires et environnementaux (CSRSE) dans l’avis intitulé «Risks from organic CMR substances in toys» qu’il a adopté le 18 mai 2010.
 (5)
 En multipliant 5 % de la dose journalière acceptable par le poids de l’enfant et en divisant le résultat par la quantité de matière de jouet ingérée, les valeurs limites suivantes ont été établies pour le cadmium: 23 mg/kg pour la matière grattée, 1,9 mg/kg pour la matière sèche et 0,5 mg/kg pour la matière liquide.
 (6)
 L’Autorité européenne de sécurité des aliments (EFSA) a conclu, dans son avis du 30 janvier 2009, que la dose hebdomadaire acceptable établie par le JECFA en 1989, et confirmée par ce même comité en 2001, n’est plus adaptée, compte tenu de nouvelles données sur la toxicologie du cadmium. L’EFSA a établi une nouvelle dose hebdomadaire acceptable de 2,5 μg/kg, soit une dose journalière acceptable de 0,36 μg/kg.
 (7)
 En multipliant 5 % de la nouvelle dose journalière acceptable par le poids de l’enfant et en divisant le résultat par la quantité de matière de jouet ingérée, les valeurs limites pour le cadmium deviennent: 17 mg/kg pour la matière grattée, 1,3 mg/kg pour la matière sèche et 0,3 mg/kg pour la matière liquide.
 (8)
 La directive 2009/48/CE devrait donc être modifiée en conséquence.
 (9)
 Les mesures prévues par la présente directive sont conformes à l’avis du comité pour la sécurité des jouets,
 A ADOPTÉ LA PRÉSENTE DIRECTIVE:
 Article premier
 L’annexe II, partie III, de la directive 2009/48/CE est modifiée conformément à l’annexe de la présente directive.
 Article 2
 1. Les États membres adoptent et publient, au plus tard le 20 janvier 2013, les dispositions législatives, réglementaires et administratives nécessaires pour se conformer à la présente directive. Ils communiquent immédiatement à la Commission le texte de ces dispositions.
 Ils appliquent ces dispositions à partir du 20 juillet 2013.
 Lorsque les États membres adoptent ces dispositions, celles-ci contiennent une référence à la présente directive ou sont accompagnées d’une telle référence lors de leur publication officielle. Les modalités de cette référence sont arrêtées par les États membres.
 2. Les États membres communiquent à la Commission le texte des dispositions essentielles de droit interne qu’ils adoptent dans le domaine couvert par la présente directive.
 Article 3
 La présente directive entre en vigueur le vingtième jour suivant celui de sa publication au Journal officiel de l’Union européenne.
 Article 4
 Les États membres sont destinataires de la présente directive.
 Fait à Bruxelles, le 2 mars 2012.
 Par la Commission
 Le président
 José Manuel BARROSO
 (1) JO L 170 du 30.6.2009, p. 1.
 ANNEXE
 L’annexe II, partie III, de la directive 2009/48/CE est modifiée comme suit:
 Au point 13, l’entrée pour le cadmium est remplacée par les données suivantes:
 Élément
 mg/kg
 de matière de jouet sèche, friable, poudreuse ou souple
 mg/kg
 de matière de jouet liquide ou collante
 mg/kg
 de matière grattée du jouet
 «Cadmium
 1,3
 0,3
 17»


type: contracts

text:
 Tähtis õiguslik teade
 |
 22000A1209(01)
 Euroopa Liidu Teataja L 309 , 09/12/2000 Lk 0030 - 0032
 KirjavahetusEuroopa Liidu ja endise Jugoslaavia Makedoonia Vabariigi vahel, mis puudutab kaubanduse ja kaubandussuhete koostööleppe ii jaotise sätete peatamistA. Ühenduse kiriBrüssel, 20. november 2000Lugupeetud ...,Võttes arvesse Euroopa Nõukogu 18. septembri 2000 (EÜ) nr 2007/2000 määrusega heaks kiidetud autonoomseid kaubanduseelistusi, mis kehtestavad erandlikud kaubandusmeetmed riikidele ja territooriumidele, kes osalevad või on seotud Euroopa Liidu stabiliseerimis- ja liitumisprotsessiga, määruse (EÜ) nr 2820/98 parandustega ja (EÜ) määruste nr 1763/1999 ja nr 6/2000 tühistamisega, on Euroopa Liidu ja endise Jugoslaavia Makedoonia Vabariigi vahel kokku lepitud peatada II jaotises esitatud Euroopa Liidu ja endise Jugoslaavia Makedoonia Vabariigi vahelise kirjavahetuse teel 29. aprillil 1997. a. sõlmitud kaubanduse ja kaubandussuhete koostööleppe sätete kehtivus, sh kõik selle lisad.Nõukogu 18. septembri 2000. a. määrus (EÜ) nr 2007/2000, parandatuna määrusega (EÜ) nr 2563/2000, mis reguleerib alates viimase määruse kehtimahakkamise kuupäevast Euroopa Liidu ja endise Jugoslaavia Makedoonia Vabariigi vahelist kaubandusrežiimi ja II jaotises esitatud kaubanduse ja kaubandussuhete koostööleppe sätteid, k.a kõik nende juurde kuuluvad lisad, kaotab samast kuupäevast arvates endise Jugoslaavia Makedoonia Vabariigi suhtes kehtivuse.II jaotise kehtivuse peatamine ja kõigi kaubandusega seotud koostöölepingu sätete täitmine peatatakse alati, kui määrus (EÜ) nr 2007/2000 kaotab endise Jugoslaavia Makedoonia Vabariigi suhtes kehtivuse.Oleksin Teile tänulik, kui kinnitaksite, et Teie valitsus on eespool nimetatuga nõus.Austatud härra, palun võtke vastu minu sügavaim lugupidamine.Euroopa Liidu Nõukogu nimel+++++ TIFF +++++B. Endise Jugoslaavia Makedoonia Vabariigi kiriSkopje, 22. november 2000Lugupeetud ...,Mul on au teatada, et olen kätte saanud Teie siinkohal lisatud kirja, mis puudutas II jaotises esitatud Euroopa Liidu ja endise Jugoslaavia Makedoonia Vabariigi vahelise kirjavahetuse teel 29. aprillil 1997. a. sõlmitud kaubanduse ja kaubandussuhete koostööleppe sätete kehtivuse, sh kõigi selle lisade peatamise.Makedoonia Vabariigil on au teatada oma nõustumisest selle kirja sisuga.Kirjade vahetamist tuleb pidada selle lepingu kinnituseks.Deklareerin siiski, et Makedoonia Vabariigile ei ole vastuvõetav ülalmainitud lepingus minu riigi kohta kasutatav nimetus, pidades silmas, et minu riigi põhiseaduslik nimi on Makedoonia Vabariik.Makedoonia Vabariigi valitsuse nimel+++++ TIFF +++++C. Euroopa Ühenduse kiriBrüssel, 5. detsember 2000Lugupeetud ...,Mul on au teatada, et sain kätte Teie 22. novembri 2000. aasta kirja.Euroopa Liit märgib, et kirjade vahetamine Euroopa Liidu Nõukogu presidendi ja Teie riigi peaministri vahel, mis peatab II jaotises esitatud Euroopa Liidu ja Teie riigi vahelise kirjavahetuse teel 29. aprillil 1997. a. sõlmitud kaubanduse ja kaubandussuhete koostööleppe sätete kehtivuse, sh kõigi selle lisade kehtivuse, on lõpule viidud.Seda ei saa tõlgendada Euroopa Liidu nõustumisena ühegi teise nimega mis tahes muul kujul või vormis kui "endine Jugoslaavia Makedoonia Vabariik".Austatud härra, palun võtke vastu minu sügavaim lugupidamine.Euroopa Liidu Nõukogu nimel+++++ TIFF +++++--------------------------------------------------


text:
 31.7.2010
 FI
 Euroopan unionin virallinen lehti
 C 209/26
 Kanne 19.5.2010 — Euroopan komissio v. Helleenien tasavalta
 (Asia C-248/10)
 ()
 2010/C 209/36
 Oikeudenkäyntikieli: kreikka
 Asianosaiset
 Kantaja: Euroopan komissio (asiamiehet: M. Karanasou-Apostolopoulou ja A. Nijenhuis)
 Vastaaja: Helleenien tasavalta
 Vaatimukset
 —
 On todettava, että Helleenien tasavalta ei ole noudattanut neuvoston direktiivin 92/49/ETY sekä direktiivien 2002/83/EY, 2004/39/EY, 2005/68/EY ja 2006/48/EY muuttamisesta rahoitusalalla tapahtuvaan omistusosuuksien hankintaan ja lisäämiseen sovellettavien toiminnan vakauden arviointia koskevien menettelysääntöjen ja periaatteiden osalta 5.9.2007 annetun Euroopan parlamentin ja neuvoston direktiivin 2007/44/EY (1) mukaisia velvoitteitaan, koska se ei ole antanut kyseisen direktiivin täysimääräisen noudattamisen edellyttämiä lakeja, asetuksia ja hallinnollisia määräyksiä tai koska se ei ainakaan ole ilmoittanut näistä toimenpiteistä komissiolle.
 —
 Helleenien tasavalta on velvoitettava korvaamaan oikeudenkäyntikulut.
 Oikeudelliset perusteet ja pääasialliset perustelut
 Määräaika, jossa direktiivi 2007/44/EY oli pantava täytäntöön sisäisessä oikeusjärjestyksessä, on päättynyt 21.5.2009.
 (1) EUVL L 247, 21.9.2007, s. 1.


text:
 Avis juridique important
 |
 21997D0129(01)
 Beslut nr 2/96 av associeringsrådet mellan Europeiska gemenskaperna och deras medlemsstater, å ena sidan, och Republiken Slovakien, å andra sidan av den 9 december 1996 om de tullar som tas ut av Republiken Slovakien på import av bearbetade jordbruksprodukter med ursprung i gemenskapen
 Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning nr L 026 , 29/01/1997 s. 0012 - 0020
 BESLUT nr 2/96 AV ASSOCIERINGSRÅDET MELLAN EUROPEISKA GEMENSKAPERNA OCH DERAS MEDLEMSSTATER, Å ENA SIDAN, OCH REPUBLIKEN SLOVAKIEN, Å ANDRA SIDAN av den 9 december 1996 om de tullar som tas ut av Republiken Slovakien på import av bearbetade jordbruksprodukter med ursprung i gemenskapen (97/82/EKSG, EG, Euratom)ASSOCIERINGSRÅDET HAR BESLUTAT FÖLJANDEmed beaktande av Europaavtalet om associering mellan Europeiska gemenskaperna och deras medlemsstater, å ena sidan, och Republiken Slovakien, å andra sidan (1), särskilt artikel 6.1 i protokoll nr 3 om handel mellan Republiken Slovakien och gemenskapen med bearbetade jordbruksprodukter, som inte omfattas av bilaga II till EG-fördraget, ochmed beaktande av följande:Vid tillämpning av bestämmelserna i protokoll nr 3 har Republiken Slovakien åtagit sig att fastställa jordbrukskomponentsdelen och den del som inte är jordbrukskomponent av de avgifter som tas ut vid import av produkter med ursprung i gemenskapen, vilka omfattas av det protokollet, och att minska den del som inte är jordbrukskomponent i dent takt som fastställts i tabell 2 i bilagan till det protokollet.Republiken Slovakien har i enlighet med artiklarna 1 och 2 i protokoll nr 3 fastställt de jordbrukskomponentsdelar, som, i den takt som avses i artikel 5.2 i protokollet, skall ersätta de nuvarande tullavgifterna.HÄRIGENOM FÖRESKRIVS FÖLJANDE.Artikel 1 I bilagan till detta beslut fastställs de tullar som skall tas ut på import till Republiken Slovakien på bearbetade jordbruksprodukter med ursprung i gemenskapen, vilka finns förtecknade i protokoll nr 3 om handel mellan Republiken Slovakien och gemenskapen om bearbetade jordbruksprodukter, som inte omfattas av bilaga II till EG-fördraget.Artikel 2 Detta beslut träder i kraft den 1 januari 1997.Urfärdat i Bratislava den 9 december 1996.På associeringsrådets vägnarP. HAMZIKOrdförande(1) EGT nr L 359, 31.12.1994, s. 1.BILAGA Tullar som tas ut av Republiken Slovakien vid import av bearbetade jordbruksprodukter med ursprung i gemenskapen >Plats för tabell>


text:
 Avis juridique important
 |
 21999A0812(01)
 Accordo in forma di scambio di lettere che modifica l'accordo in forma di scambio di lettere tra la Comunità europea e la Repubblica d'Ungheria relativo alla fissazione reciproca di contingenti tariffari per taluni vini
 Gazzetta ufficiale n. L 212 del 12/08/1999 pag. 0003 - 0008
 ACCORDO IN FORMA DI SCAMBIO DI LETTEREche modifica l'accordo in forma di scambio di lettere tra la Comunità europea e la Repubblica d'Ungheria relativo alla fissazione reciproca di contingenti tariffari per taluni viniA. Lettera della ComunitàBruxelles, 29 luglio 1999Signor...,mi pregio riferirmi all'accordo in forma di scambio di lettere, del 29 novembre 1993, tra la Comunità europea e la Repubblica d'Ungheria relativo alla fissazione reciproca di contingenti tariffari per taluni vini e ai negoziati che hanno avuto luogo tra la Comunità europea e la Repubblica d'Ungheria allo scopo di adeguare l'accordo suddetto, in seguito all'adesione della Repubblica d'Austria, della Repubblica di Finlandia e del Regno di Svezia, e di prorogarlo oltre il 31 dicembre 1998.Le confermo che in esito ai negoziati suddetti la Comunità europea e la Repubblica d'Ungheria hanno convenuto quanto segue:I. Al punto 2), primo e terzo trattino dell'accordo, i termini "... conformemente alla legge vitivinicola ungherese n. 36/1970 e al regolamento esplicativo n. 40/1977 (MEM), modificato dai regolamenti n. 7/1990 (FM) e n. 23/1992 (FM)..." sono sostituiti dai termini: "... conformemente alla legge vitivinicola ungherese...".II. La tabella 1 nell'allegato di detto accordo è sostituita dalla tabella seguente: "Quantitativi di vini originari della Comunità soggetti a riduzioni tariffarie>SPAZIO PER TABELLA>"III. La tabella 2 nell'allegato di detto accordo è sostituita dalla tabella seguente: "Quantitativi di vini originari dell'Ungheria soggetti a riduzioni tariffarie>SPAZIO PER TABELLA>"IV. Il punto 3, lettera a) di detto accordo è sostituito dal testo seguente: "per quanto concerne i dazi applicati dall'Ungheria all'importazione dei vini originari della Comunità:- nel 1993: 90 % del dazio di base,- nel 1994: 80 % del dazio di base,- nel 1995 e negli anni successivi: 70 % del dazio di base,- nel 1999, secondo il principio dello status quo, i dazi applicabili indicati nella tabella seguente:Dazi applicati dall'Ungheria alle importazioni di vini originari della Comunità>SPAZIO PER TABELLA>"Il presente scambio di lettere è approvato dalle parti contraenti secondo le rispettive procedure.Il presente accordo entra in vigore il giorno della firma. Esso si applica dal 1o maggio 1999 al 31 dicembre 1999, secondo le legislazioni e i regolamenti rispettivi delle parti contraenti. Esso scade il 31 dicembre 1999. Nel corso del primo semestre del 1999 saranno avviati negoziati per la conclusione di un protocollo addizionale all'accordo europeo il cui ambito di applicazione coprirà il settore dei vini e quello delle bevande alcoliche. Inoltre, il protocollo addizionale all'accordo europeo definirà le modalità di cooperazione fra la Repubblica d'Ungheria e la Comunità europea nell'intento di favorire l'attuazione di un programma per la graduale applicazione, da parte dell'Ungheria, dell'"acquis comunitario" nel settore dei vini e delle bevande alcoliche, in particolare per quanto concerne il rafforzamento dei dispositivi di controllo e di gestione della produzione nel settore vitivinicolo (inclusa la realizzazione di uno schedario viticolo).Le sarei grato se volesse confermarmi l'accordo del suo governo sul contenuto della presente lettera.Voglia gradire, Signor..., i sensi della mia più alta considerazione.A nome del Consiglio dell'Unione europea>PIC FILE= "L_1999212IT.000501.EPS">B. Lettera della Repubblica d'UngheriaBruxelles, 29 luglio 1999Signor...,ho il piacere di comunicarle di aver ricevuto la sua lettera così formulata: "mi pregio riferirmi all'accordo in forma di scambio di lettere, del 29 novembre 1993, tra la Comunità europea e la Repubblica d'Ungheria relativo alla fissazione reciproca di contingenti tariffari per taluni vini e ai negoziati che hanno avuto luogo tra la Comunità europea e la Repubblica d'Ungheria allo scopo di adeguare l'accordo suddetto, in seguito all'adesione della Repubblica d'Austria, della Repubblica di Finlandia e del Regno di Svezia, e di prorogarlo oltre il 31 dicembre 1998.Le confermo che in esito ai negoziati suddetti la Comunità europea e la Repubblica d'Ungheria hanno convenuto quanto segue:I. Al punto 2), primo e terzo trattino dell'accordo, i termini '... conformemente alla legge vitivinicola ungherese n. 36/1970 e al regolamento applicativo n. 40/1977 (MEM), modificato dai regolamenti n. 7/1990 (FM) e n. 23/1992 (FM)...' sono sostituiti dai termini: '... conformemente alla legge vitivinicola ungherese...'.II. La tabella 1 nell'allegato di detto accordo è sostituita dalla tabella seguente: 'Quantitativi di vini originari della Comunità soggetti a riduzioni tariffarie>SPAZIO PER TABELLA>'III. La tabella 2 nell'allegato di detto accordo è sostituita dalla tabella seguente: 'Quantitativi di vini originari dell'Ungheria soggetti a riduzioni tariffarie>SPAZIO PER TABELLA>'IV. Il punto 3, lettera a) di detto accordo è sostituito dal testo seguente: 'per quanto concerne i dazi applicati dall'Ungheria all'importazione dei vini originari della Comunità:- nel 1993: 90 % del dazio di base,- nel 1994: 80 % del dazio di base,- nel 1995 e negli anni successivi: 70 % del dazio di base,- nel 1999, secondo il principio dello status quo, i dazi applicabili indicati nella tabella seguente:Dazi applicati dall'Ungheria alle importazioni di vini originari della Comunità>SPAZIO PER TABELLA>'Il presente scambio di lettere è approvato dalle parti contraenti secondo le rispettive procedure.Il presente accordo entra in vigore il giorno della firma. Esso si applica dal 1o maggio 1999 al 31 dicembre 1999, secondo le legislazioni e i regolamenti rispettivi delle parti contraenti. Esso scade il 31 dicembre 1999. Nel corso del primo semestre del 1999 saranno avviati negoziati per la conclusione di un protocollo addizionale all'accordo europeo il cui ambito di applicazione coprirà il settore dei vini e quello delle bevande alcoliche. Inoltre, il protocollo addizionale all'accordo europeo definirà le modalità di cooperazione fra la Repubblica d'Ungheria e la Comunità europea nell'intento di favorire l'attuazione di un programma per la graduale applicazione, da parte dell'Ungheria, dell''acquis comunitario' nel settore dei vini e delle bevande alcoliche, in particolare per quanto concerne il rafforzamento dei dispositivi di controllo e di gestione della produzione nel settore vitivinicolo (inclusa la realizzazione di uno schedario viticolo).Le sarei grato se volesse confermarmi l'accordo del suo governo sul contenuto della presente lettera."Ho il piacere di confermarle l'accordo del governo del mio paese sul contenuto di tale lettera.Voglia gradire, Signor..., i sensi della mia più alta considerazione.Per il governo della Repubblica d'Ungheria>PIC FILE= "L_1999212IT.000801.EPS">


text:
Rakendusliides ehk programmiliides ehk rakendustarkvara liides ehk API (inglise keeles Application Programming Interface) on arvutiprogrammides alamprogrammi määratluste, protokollide ja tööriistade komplekt rakendustarkvara ehitamiseks. Üldiselt on tegemist eri tarkvarakomponentide vahelise selgelt määratletud sidevahendite kogumiga. Rakendusliidese ülesanne on lihtsustada tarkvara arendamist, andes ette programmiplokid, mida programmeerijad kasutavad lõpliku arvutiprogrammi koostamisel. Rakendusliides võib olla veebipõhine süsteem, operatsioonisüsteem, andmebaasi süsteem, arvuti riistvara või tarkvara kogum. Rakendusliidese spetsifikatsiooni võib esitleda mitmesugusel kujul, kuid tihti sisaldab see rutiinide, andmestruktuuride, objektiklasside, muutujate või protseduuri kutsumise kirjeldusi. Näiteid rakendusliidestest: POSIX, Microsoft Windows API, C++ Standard Template Library ja Java API'id. Tavapäraselt käib rakendusliidestega kaasa dokumentatsioon, et hõlbustada nende kasutamist.
 Otstarve
 Samamoodi, nagu lihtsustab graafiline kasutajaliides arvutiprogrammide kasutamist, lihtsustab rakendusliides programmeerijatel programmide kirjutamist. Rakendusliides lihtsustab programmeerimist, eemaldades alusimplementatsiooni ja jättes alles ainult objektid ja toimingud, mida programmeerijal vaja läheb. Kui graafiline kasutajaliides loob kasutajale näiteks nupu, mida vajutades sorteeritakse e-kirjad vanuse järgi, siis rakendusliides pakub programmeerijale funktsiooni, mis sorteerib failid teatud omaduse järgi, ilma et ta peaks teadma ja aru saama sellest, kuidas failisüsteem need failid ära sorteerib.
 Kasutusalad
 Teegid ja tarkvararaamistikud
 Rakendusliides on tavaliselt seotud tarkvara teekidega. Rakendusliides kirjeldab ja määrab reeglikogumi eeldatava käitumise, kuid teek on reeglikogumi implementatsioon. Ühel rakendusliidesel saab olla mitu (või mitte ühtegi) implementatsiooni eri teekide näol, mis kasutavad sama rakendusliidest. Rakendusliidese eraldamine tema implementatsioonidest võimaldab ühes keeles kirjutatud programmidel kasutada teises keeles kirjutatud teeke. Näiteks, kuna Scala ja Java kompileeruvad ühilduvaks baitkoodiks, siis Scala programmeerijad saavad kasutada ükskõik millist Java API'i.
 Rakendusliidese kasutus varieerub programmeerimiskeelte vahel. Rakendusliides protseduurilise programmeerimiskeele jaoks nagu Lua koosneb põhiliselt algrutiinidest, et käivitada kood, muuta andmeid või käsitleda vigu. Kuid rakendusliides objektorienteeritud programmeerimiskeele jaoks nagu Java, rakendab klasside kirjeldused ja nende meetodid.
 Programmeerimiskeelte vahelised seosed on samuti rakendusliidesed. Sidudes ühe programmeerimiskeele funktsioonid ja võimalused teises keeles koostatud teegiga, võimaldavad programmeerimiskeelte vahelised seosed kasutada ühes keeles kirjutatud teeki või teenust, teises programmeerimiskeeles programmeerides. Liidesegeneraatorid nagu SWIG ja F2PY hõlbustavad selliste teekide loomist.
 Rakendusliides võib olla ka seotud tarkvararaamistikuga – tarkvararaamistik võib koosneda mitmest teegist, mis implementeerivad mitut rakendusliidest, kuid erinevalt rakendusliidese tavapärasest kasutusest on tarkvararaamistiku funktsionaalsed võimalused laiendatud tarkvararaamistikku endasse, uute klasside lisamisega. Lisaks võib üldine programmipõhine juhtimisvoog olla väljaspool kutsuja kontrolli ja olla hoopis tarkvararaamistiku juhtimise all. Kokkuvõtvalt koosneb tarkvararaamistik mitmest eri teegist ja nende teekide kasutus on tarkvararaamistikku endasse sisse ehitatud. Samuti kontrollib tarkvararaamistik ise, kuidas ta neid teeke kasutab.
 Operatsioonisüsteemid
 Rakendusliides saab määrata rakenduse ja operatsioonisüsteemi vahelise liidese. POSIX näiteks määrab levinud rakendusliideste kogu, mille komponendid võimaldavad rakendusel, kirjutatud ühe POSIX vastava operatsioonisüsteemi jaoks, kompileeruda teisel POSIX vastaval operatsioonisüsteemil.
 Microsoft peab tähtsaks tagurpidi ühilduvate rakendusliideste loomist, et vanemaid rakendusi saaks käivitada uuemal Windowsi versioonil. Näiteks Microsofti Windows API (Win32) teek.
 Rakendusliides erineb rakenduse binaarliidesest selle poolest, et rakendusliides on algkoodil baseeruv, kuid binaarliides on kahendfailil baseeruv. Näiteks POSIX pakub rakendusliideseid, kuid Linux Standard Base pakub binaarliideseid.
 Kaugühenduse rakendusliidesed
 Kaugühenduse rakendusliidesed võimaldavad tarkvaraarendajatel muuta ressursse protokollide kaudu. Näiteks Java Database Connectivity rakendusliides lubab arendajatel saata eri andmebaasidesse päringuid. Java Remote Method Invocation rakendusliides kasutab Java Remote Method protokolli, et lubada päringute kaugsaatmine. See teeb andmebaaside halduse palju kergemaks. Kaugühenduse rakendusliidesed on kasulikud objektorienteeritud programmeerimises objektidega töötamisel.
 Veebipõhised rakendusliidesed
 Veebipõhised rakendusliidesed on liidesed, mille kaudu käib suhtlus ettevõtte ja selle ressursse kasutava rakenduse vahel. Rakendusliides pakub programmeeritavaid teeke rakenduste hulgale, mis teenindavad eri kasutajaid. Veeblehekülgede arendamisel on veebipõhised rakendusliidesed defineeritud Hüperteksti edastusprotokolli (HTTP) päringute ja vastavate vastustega, mis on tavaliselt XML või JSON formaadis. Näiteks on veebipoe leheküljele lisatud rakendusliides, mis koostab statistikat ostetud kauba kättesaamisaegade kohta, ilma et poe andmebaasi oleks vaja koostada vastav tabel andmetega.
 Kuigi veebipõhilised rakendusliidesed on olnud sünonüümiks veebiteenuste jaoks, on viimane trend (nii-öelda Veebis 2.0) liikunud eemale SOA protokollide ja teenusele orienteeritud arhitektuurist (SOA). Pigem kasutatakse rohkem REST-stiilis veebiressursse ja ressursile orienteeritud arhitektuuri (ROA). Suur roll selles on ressursi kirjelduse tarkvararaamistikul (RDF). Veebipõhised rakendusliidesed lubavad eri liideste kombineerimist. Sotsiaalmeedia veebilehekülgede rakendusliidesed lubavad andmevahetust eri rakenduste vahel. Sellisel juhul ilmuvad postitatud andmed ühes kohas automaatselt ka teises kohas. See lubab ka automaatset andmete uuendamist üle mitme rakenduse. Näiteks kui lisada uus pilt Instagrami, siis teine veebileht, mis kasutab Instagrami andmeid, saab otsese ligipääsu lisatud pildile. Või kui ühendada mõni teine rakendus või veebiteenus oma Google'i kasutajaga, siis Google'i kasutaja andmete muutmisel muutuvad ka andmed kõikides teistes rakendustes ja veebiteenustes, mis olid Google'i kasutajaga seotud.
 Näiteid rakendusliidestest
 ASPI väikearvutisüsteemi liideste jaoks
 Cocoa ja Carbon Macintoshi süsteemidele
 DirectX Microsoft Windowsi süsteemidele
 Java API'id
 ODBC Microsoft Windowsi süsteemidele
 OpenALi heli rakendusliides
 OpenCLi arvutusliidesed protsessorite jaoks
 OpenGLi graafika rakendusliides
 OpenMPi programmeerimisliides Unixi ja Microsoft Windowsi süsteemidele
 SAPI serveri rakenduste programmeerimise rakendusliides
 Vaata ka
 Programmeerimine
 Programmeerimiskeel
 Viited
 Tarkvaraarendus


text:
Jean-François Steiert, né le à Berne (originaire de Rickenbach), est une personnalité politique suisse,membre du Parti socialiste.
 Jean-François Steiert est le petit-fils de l'ancien chancelier d'État René Binz et le frère aîné du syndic de Fribourg Thierry Steiert.
 Biographie
 Jean-François Steiert naît le à Berne. Il est originaire de Rickenbach, dans le canton de Thurgovie. Il a deux frères cadets : Thierry Steiert, syndic de Fribourg depuis 2016, et Laurent Steiert, chef suppléant de la section cinéma à l'Office fédéral de la culture. Son père, Wolfang, est médecin de famille et sa mère, née Sébastienne Binz, est professeur de piano. Son grand-père maternel, René Binz, membre du Parti conservateur chrétien-social, est chancelier de l'État de Fribourg de 1933 à 1969. Il est bilingue français-allemand.
 Il fait sa scolarité primaire en allemand et la secondaire en français. Après avoir obtenu une maturité gymnasiale de type scientifique en 1978 au Collège Saint-Michel, il fait des études d'histoire à l'Université de Fribourg. Il décroche sa licence en 1989, tout en collaborant en parallèle à divers journaux et publications. Il crée par ailleurs une imprimerie et une société de production d'énergie hydraulique dans le canton de Saint-Gall. Il occupe à partir de 1992 un poste de collaborateur scientifique auprès du Centre de compétence sur le plurilinguisme à Berne.
 Dans les années 1990, il est successivement porte-parole, puis secrétaire général du Parti socialiste suisse. Entre 2000 et 2002, il est collaborateur personnel de Francine Jeanprêtre, alors directrice du département de la formation et de la jeunesse du canton de Vaud puis, depuis 2002, délégué aux affaires intercantonales de ce même département. Le , il est élu président de la Conférence des secrétaires généraux de la Conférence intercantonale de l'instruction publique de la Suisse romande et du Tessin.
 Il est en couple avec Manon Delisle, responsable du développement durable au canton de Fribourg de à , et père de deux filles. Il est de confession catholique et vit à Fribourg.
 Parcours politique
 Il est membre du Conseil général (législatif) de Fribourg d' à , puis du Grand Conseil du canton de Fribourg jusqu'en .
 À la suite du décès de Liliane Chappuis le , il est élu au Conseil national comme représentant du canton de Fribourg, puis réélu en octobre 2007, en octobre 2011 et en octobre 2015, avec le meilleur résultat de l'ensemble des candidats pour cette dernière réélection. Il siège brièvement à la Commission des affaires juridiques (CAJ), puis à partir de à la Commission de la science, de l'éducation et de la culture (CSEC) et, au surplus à partir de , à la Commission de la sécurité sociale et de la santé publique (CSSS).
 Il échoue de peu en 2013 à succéder à la démocrate-chrétienne Isabelle Chassot au Conseil d'État du canton de Fribourg, terminant avec 31 352 voix à 562 voix seulement du démocrate-chrétien Jean-Pierre Siggen.
 En , il est élu au Conseil d'État fribourgeois. Il prend la tête de la Direction de l’aménagement, de l’environnement et des constructions. À la suite de cette élection, il quitte le Conseil national le . Sa manière de diriger son département, qualifiée d'autoritaire et de stakhanoviste, donne lieu à un audit en 2019.
 Il préside le Conseil d'État en 2021.
 Arrivé en première position au premier tour de l'élection du Conseil d'État du , il est réélu au second tour le . Il termine en septième position, juste devant sa colistière non élue Valérie Piller Carrard.
 Positionnement politique
 Spécialiste des questions sociales, de santé ou de formation, il est qualifié de socialiste à tendance centriste.
 Autres mandats
 Il est notamment président pendant huit ans de l'association Pro Velo Suisse.
 Références
 Liens externes
 Profil Smartvote 2021
 Naissance en février 1961
 Naissance à Berne
 Personnalité politique fribourgeoise
 Personnalité du Parti socialiste suisse
 Député au Grand Conseil du canton de Fribourg
 Conseiller national suisse de la 47e législature
 Conseiller national suisse de la 48e législature
 Conseiller national suisse de la 49e législature
 Conseiller national suisse de la 50e législature


type: other

text:
Kawża C-504/15: Digriet tal-Qorti tal-Ġustizzja (Is-Seba’ Awla) tas-7 ta’ April 2016 (talba għal deċizjoni preliminari tat-Tribunale di Frosinone – l-Italja) – proċeduri kriminali kontra Antonio Paolo Conti (Rinviju għal deċiżjoni preliminari — Artikolu 99 tar-Regolamenti tal-Proċedura tal-Qorti tal-Ġustizzja — Domandi preliminari identiċi — Artikoli 49 TFUE u 56 TFUE — Libertà ta’ stabbiliment — Libertà li jiġu pprovduti servizzi — Logħob tal-ażżard — Sentenza tal-Qorti tal-Ġustizzja li ddikjarat bħala inkompatibbli mad-dritt tal-Unjoni, il-leġiżlazzjoni nazzjonali dwar il-konċessjonijiet għall-attività ta’ ġbir ta’ fondi ta’ Pariġi — Organizzazzjoni mill-ġdid tas-sistema permezz ta’ sejħa għal offerti ġdida — Trasferiment b’titolu gratwit tal-użu tal-oġġetti materjali u mhux materjali miżmuma b’titolu ta’ proprjetà u li jikkostitwixxu n-netwerk ta’ ġestjoni u ta’ ġbir tal-logħob — Restrizzjoni — Raġunijiet impellanti ta’ interess ġenerali — Proporzjonalità) - EU Law and Publications
 Il-liġi tal-UE Kawża C-504/15: Digriet tal-Qorti tal-Ġustizzja (Is-Seba’ Awla) tas-7 ta’ April 2016 (talba għal deċizjoni preliminari tat-Tribunale di Frosinone – l-Italja) – proċeduri kriminali kontra Antonio Paolo Conti (Rinviju għal deċiżjoni preliminari — Artikolu 99 tar-Regolamenti tal-Proċedura tal-Qorti tal-Ġustizzja — Domandi preliminari identiċi — Artikoli 49 TFUE u 56 TFUE — Libertà ta’ stabbiliment — Libertà li jiġu pprovduti servizzi — Logħob tal-ażżard — Sentenza tal-Qorti tal-Ġustizzja li ddikjarat bħala inkompatibbli mad-dritt tal-Unjoni, il-leġiżlazzjoni nazzjonali dwar il-konċessjonijiet għall-attività ta’ ġbir ta’ fondi ta’ Pariġi — Organizzazzjoni mill-ġdid tas-sistema permezz ta’ sejħa għal offerti ġdida — Trasferiment b’titolu gratwit tal-użu tal-oġġetti materjali u mhux materjali miżmuma b’titolu ta’ proprjetà u li jikkostitwixxu n-netwerk ta’ ġestjoni u ta’ ġbir tal-logħob — Restrizzjoni — Raġunijiet impellanti ta’ interess ġenerali — Proporzjonalità)
 : 62015CB0504
 : JOC_2016_270_R_0015
 : ORD-C-0504-2015


text:
Kárijev prašek je mešanica začimb, ki se tradicionalno uporablja v kuhinji Južne in Jugovzhodne Azije, pogosto je pikanten. Pradomovina curryja je Indija.
 Sestavine
 Karijev prašek sestavlja vsaj 12 do 15 sestavin, ponekod v Indiji zmešajo tudi do 36 sestavin.
 Osnovne sestavine so: kajenski poper, črni poper, nageljnove žbice, kumina, koriander, ingver, kurkuma, muškatni orešek, muškatni cvet, gorčica in piment.
 Pogosto je sestava mešanice odvisna od nacionalne ali regionalne tradicije, verskih praks, ponekod celo od družinskega okusa.
 Uporaba
 Karijev prašek se uporablja za pripravo:
 rib, prerutnine, teletine in predvsem bravine
 riža in zelenjave
 omak, ki se ponudijo k ribam, jajcem in perutnini
 Ker je že sam kombinacija začimb, mu praviloma ni treba nič dodajati. Dobro pa se dopolnjuje s čebulo in česnom, dobro ga dopolni kaj kislega (npr. limonin sok).
 Izraz curry (slovensko kari) se v žargonu uporablja v Evropi tudi za jedi, ki vsebujejo karijev prašek.
 Glej tudi
 kari, izraz za indijske jedi
 Viri
 Gööck Roland, Gewürze und Krauter von A - Z" (V svetu začimb in dišav), Založba Mladinska knjiga in HP Droga Portorož, Ljubljana, 1979
 Zunanje povezave
 http://www.kulinarika.net/baze/zacimbe.asp
 Začimbe
 Kulinarika
 Dodatki jedem


text:
 7.11.2009
 BG
 Официален вестник на Европейския съюз
 C 267/45
 Жалба, подадена на 2 септември 2009 г. от Perfetti Van Melle SpA срещу Решение на Първоинстанционния съд (осми състав) от 1 юли 2009 г. по дело Perfetti Van Melle SpA/Служба за хармонизация във вътрешния пазар (марки, дизайни и модели) (СХВП), Cloetta Fazer AB, T-16/08
 (Дело C-353/09 P)
 2009/C 267/78
 Език на производството: английски
 Страни
 Жалбоподател: Perfetti Van Melle SpA (представители: P. Perani и P. Pozzi, avvocati)
 Друга страна в производството: Служба за хармонизация във вътрешния пазар (марки, дизайни и модели) (СХВП), Cloetta Fazer AB
 Искания на жалбоподателя
 Жалбоподателят моли Съда:
 —
 да уважи жалбата и съответно да отмени Решение на Първоинстанционния съд по дело T-16/08 в неговата цялост в съответствие с член 61 от Статута на Съда на Европейските общности и с член 113 от Процедурния правилник,
 —
 да постанови окончателно решение — ако фазата на производството позволява това — с което да отмени Решението от 24 ноември 2005 г. на отдела по заличаването на СХВП, постановено по искане за заличаване No 941 C 973065 и да нареди на ответниците да заплатят съдебните разноски, направени в производствата пред Първоинстанционния съд и Съда на Европейските общности, както и тези, направени в производствата за обявяване на недействителност пред СХВП.
 Правни основания и основни доводи
 1. Правни основания
 С настоящата жалба Perfetti Van Melle S.p.A. оспорва Решение на Първоинстанционния съд по дело T-16/08, постановено на 1 юли 2009 г. и съобщено на 2 юли 2009 г.
 В подкрепа на жалбата си жалбоподателят твърди, че обжалваното в настоящото дело решение на Първоинстанционния съд е опорочено от неправилно тълкуване и неправилно прилагане на член 8, параграф 1, буква б) от Регламент (ЕО) No 40/94 на Съвета от 20 декември 1993 година относно марката на Общността (1) във връзка с член 53, параграф 1, буква a) от него.
 1.1. Първо оплакване: жалбоподателят упреква Първоинстанционния съд, че не е разгледал конфликтните марки въз основа на критериите за „обща преценка“ или за „цялостно впечатление“.
 Установен принцип е, че общата преценка на вероятността от объркване във връзка с визуалното, фонетично или концептуално сходство на въпросните марки трябва да се основава на създаденото от тях цялостно впечатление, като се имат предвид по-специално техните отличителни и доминиращи елементи. Жалбоподателят твърди, че Първоинстанционният съд не е приложил горепосочения принцип и по-специално е достигнал до извода, че съществува вероятност от объркване, като основал своята преценка изключително върху факта, че марките имат общия елемент „CENTER“.
 В обжалваното решение марките не са разгледани в светлината на „общата преценка“ и на „цялостното впечатление“, което те оставят. Вместо това в обжалваното решение е използван аналитичен подход и е направен преглед между марката „CENTER“, от една страна, и първия словен елемент „CENTER“ на оспорената марка, от друга страна, при пълно пренебрегване на значението на втория словен елемент „SHOCK“. Вярно е, че в обжалваното решение са споменати критериите за обща преценка и за цялостно впечатление, но също така е вярно, че не е достатъчно споменаване и повтаряне на изведен от съдебната практика критерий: правомерен подход е този, при който тези критерии се следват и прилагат правилно към делото. Това не било направено в обжалваното решение. То се задоволявало да посочи, че двете сравнявани марки са сходни поради техния общ словен елемент „CENTER“ без да даде обяснение защо словния елемент „SHOCK“ не е достатъчен, за да се изключи вероятността от объркване.
 Поради гореизложените съображения жалбоподателят също твърди, че обжалваното решение е опорочено от изопачаване на фактите и от нарушение на задължението за излагане на мотиви.
 1.2. Второ оплакване: жалбоподателят упреква Първоинстанционния съд, че в обжалваното решение не е взел предвид някои изключително важни и релевантни фактори.
 С обжалваното решение също се нарушавал член 8, параграф 1, буква б), тъй като в него не била направена преценка на фактори, които са от изключително значение при определянето на наличието на вероятност от объркване между марките. По-специално Първоинстанционният съд не взел предвид продължителното съвместно съществуване на сравняваните марки и действителната липса на объркване между тях, както обстойно се обяснява в жалбата до Първоинстанционния съд.
 В допълнение Първоинстанционният съд не е преценил правилно друг важен фактор, какъвто е степента на внимание на засегнатите потребители. Всъщност било нелогично Първоинстанционният съд да поддържа, че потребител, който е относително осведомен, както и в разумни граници наблюдателен и съобразителен, не би забелязал присъствието на думата „SHOCK“ и не би признал, че разглежданите марки имат не само визуални и фонетични различия, но и различен смисъл, изразяващ се за марката „CENTER“ в дума, навеждаща на мисълта за „точка в средата на нещо“, а за марката „CENTER SHOCK“, поради наличието на най-отличителния елемент „SHOCK“, в израз, свързан с идеята за силно усещане (шок), което потребителят ще изпита при дъвчене на средата на дъвката.
 2. Искания на жалбоподателя:
 —
 да се уважи жалбата и съответно да се отмени решението на Първоинстанционния съд в неговата цялост в съответствие с член 61 от Статута на Съда на Европейските общности и с член 113 от Процедурния правилник,
 —
 да се постанови окончателно решение, ако фазата на производството позволява това, с което да се отмени Решението от 24 ноември 2005 г. на отдела по заличаването на СХВП, постановено по искане за заличаване No 941 C 973065 и да се осъдят ответниците да заплатят съдебните разноски, направени в производствата пред Първоинстанционния съд и Съда на Европейските общности, както и тези, направени в производствата за обявяване на недействителност пред СХВП в съответствие с член 122 от Процедурния правилник,
 —
 при условията на евентуалност, ако фазата на производството не позволява това, да се върне делото на Първоинстанционния съд за решаване в съответствие със задължителните критерии, установени от Съда.
 (1) ОВ L 11, стр.1; Специално издание на български език, 2007 г., глава 17, том 1, стр. 146.