type: caselaw

jurisdiction: EU

text:
 25.6.2011
 CS
 Úřední věstník Evropské unie
 C 186/10
 Usnesení Soudního dvora (šestého senátu) ze dne 18. března 2011 (žádost o rozhodnutí o předběžné otázce Tribunal Superior de Justicia de la Comunidad Valenciana — Španělsko) — David Montoya Medina v. Fondo de Garantia Salarial, Universidad de Alicante
 (Věc C-273/10) (1)
 (Článek 104 odst. 3 jednacího řádu - Sociální politika - Směrnice 1999/70/ES - Ustanovení 4 rámcové dohody o pracovních poměrech na dobu určitou - Pracovní smlouvy na dobu určitou ve veřejnoprávním sektoru - Právo na tříletý příplatek za odpracovaná léta - Zásada zákazu diskriminace)
 2011/C 186/16
 Jednací jazyk: španělština
 Předkládající soud
 Tribunal Superior de Justicia de la Comunidad Valenciana
 Účastníci původního řízení
 Žalobce: David Montoya Medina
 Žalovaní: Fondo de Garantia Salarial, Universidad de Alicante
 Předmět věci
 Žádost o rozhodnutí o předběžné otázce — Tribunal Superior de Justicia de la Comunidad Valenciana — Výklad přílohy ustanovení 4 bodu 4 směrnice Rady 1999/70/ES ze dne 28. června 1999 o rámcové dohodě o pracovních poměrech na dobu určitou uzavřené mezi organizacemi UNICE, CEEP a EKOS (Úř. věst. L 175, s. 43; Zvl. vyd. 05/03, s. 368) — Pracovní smlouvy vědecko-pedagogického pracovníka uzavřené s veřejnoprávními univerzitami — Vyloučení určitých požitků u pracovních smluv na dobu určitou
 Výrok
 Ustanovení 4 bod 4 rámcové dohody o pracovních poměrech na dobu určitou uzavřené dne 18. března 1999, která se nachází v příloze směrnice Rady 1999/70/ES ze dne 28. června 1999 o rámcové dohodě o pracovních poměrech na dobu určitou uzavřené mezi organizacemi UNICE, CEEP a EKOS, musí být vykládáno v tom smyslu, že brání vnitrostátním právním předpisům, které bez jakéhokoliv objektivního odůvodnění vyhrazují právo pobírat příplatek za odpracovaná léta pouze vysokoškolským učitelům zaměstnaným na dobu neurčitou, s vyloučením vysokoškolských učitelů zaměstnaných na dobu určitou, přičemž z hlediska výběru této dávky se obě tyto kategorie zaměstnanců nacházejí ve srovnatelných situacích.
 (1) Úř. věst. C 221, 14.8.2010.


type: other

text:
GRADAM ODAIR DLÚTHPHÁIRTÍOCHT Firmino,,pt,AN CEATHRÚ EAGRÁN,,pt,BROLLACH,,pt,Déanann poiblí an cheathrú eagrán de Odair Firmino Dlúthpháirtíochta Gradam,,pt,Tá sé mar aidhm an dámhachtain seo le gníomhaíochtaí scaipthe agus cur chun cinn an chultúir na dlúthpháirtíochta a spreagadh,,pt,agus tá sé mar chuid den sceideal Seachtaine Dlúthpháirtíochta,,pt,cinn gach bliain ag an Líonra Caritas,,pt,Meitheamh 1945, i Ipameri,,pt,GO,,en,agus faleceuem Annapolis,,pt,agus ansin mar a bhí roimhe ghníomhaire na bProinsiasach mar Caritas,,pt,Ba staonadh ar an bhfeirm,,pt,trócaireach, íon de chroí,,pt,go háirithe dubh,,es,óige agus mná,,pt,Odair cinn síocháin fíor,,pt,I gcónaí báúil leo siúd a bhí géarleanúint ad 'ag troid ar son cúis an cheartais,,pt,Leis an Gradam,,pt,Brasaíle Caritas ba mhaith leis a choinneáil beo ar an lasair na síochána,,pt
 An Bhrasaíl Caritas,,pt,comhlacht de chuid Chomhdháil Náisiúnta na Easpaig na Brasaíle,,pt,i ndiaidh a misean a fuarthas,,pt,a seoladh i,,pt,Gradam Dlúthpháirtíochta Odair Firmino,,pt,Chun gníomhaíochtaí scaipthe agus popularization spreagadh,,pt,sa bhreis ar luacháil eispéiris carachtar comhchoiteann a chosaint agus cearta an duine a chur chun cinn,,pt,Leanann na Brasaíle Caritas a neartú le heagrú an líonra sóisialta ó thaithí agus comhghníomhaíochtaí,,pt,mar sin,,pt,Caritas Brasaíle,,pt,as an ngníomh ar fud na tíre,,pt,agus cuireann sé chun cinn ar eisiata go laethúil agus an ról atá ag an scriosadh,,pt,i dtreo sochaí níos cothroime a thógáil,,pt,egalitarian agus iolra,,pt, organismo da Conferência Nacional dos Bispos do Brasil (CNBB), torna pública a quarta edição do Prêmio Odair Firmino de Solidariedade. Este Prêmio visa estimular ações de disseminação e divulgação da cultura de solidariedade, e faz parte da programação da Semana de Solidariedade, promovida anualmente pela Rede Cáritas.
 Odair Firmino nasceu em 22 de junho de 1945,em Ipameri (GO), e faleceuem Anápolis (GO) ar 05 de julho de 2008. Sua missão, antes como franciscano e depois como agente da Cáritas, foi incansável diante da exploração, do abandono e da exclusão de pessoas e comunidades. Odair assumiu a causa dos oprimidos e amou-os até o fim, como seu próximo. Seu modo de vida, sempre alegre e cheio de esperança, fez dele uma pessoa mansa, misericordiosa e pura de coração. Diante da violência que sempre atinge mais duramente os empobrecidos, especialmente negros, jovens e mulheres, Odair promoveu a paz verdadeira. Sempre solidário com os que foram perseguidos por lutarem pela causa da justiça.
 Com este Prêmio, a Cáritas Brasileira quer manter viva a chama da paz, Dóchas agus dlúthpháirtíocht a bhí peculiar,,pt,sa bhreis ar nochtadh gníomhartha láthair fuascailliú i contrárthachtaí na staire,,pt,Caibidil I - CUSPÓIRÍ,,gl,Ealaín,,en,o,,en,Na haidhmeanna Gradam Odair Firmino Dlúthpháirtíochta,,pt,I - Dreasachtaí,,ca,a chur chun cinn agus infheictheacht a thabhairt le haghaidh comhghníomhaíochtaí a chuireann le cultúr na dlúthpháirtíochta,,pt,II - a neartú le heagrú an líonra sóisialta ó thaithí agus tagairt do ghníomhartha na sochaí i gcomhthéacs an bheartais phoiblí,,pt,III - aitheantas poiblí a n-iarrachtaí na n-eagraíochtaí,,pt,eagraíochtaí agus grúpaí Grassroots ina struggles i gcosaint agus feabhsú an tsaoil,,pt,Caibidil II - AN TÉAMA,,gl, além de revelar ações libertadoras presentes nas contradições da história.
 III – reconhecer publicamente os esforços das organizações, cumainn, entidades e grupos populares em suas lutas em defesa e melhoria de vida.
 Art. 2o. An Gradam Odair Firmino Dlúthpháirtíochta,,pt,Gan bhliain,,es,an ceathrú eagrán,,pt,Beidh sé a chur a bhaineann leis an topaic,,pt,Fhlaitheas Bia agus um Dhlúthpháirtíocht,,pt,Féachann an téama a thabhairt chun solais ar roinnt de na saincheisteanna atá folaigh maidir le flaitheas bia le togra le haghaidh shárú bhfíorbhochtaineacht agus neamhionannais shóisialta,,pt,sa bhreis ar na tionscnaimh daoine,,pt,grúpaí agus / nó líonra a spreagann ceannaireacht agus le héifeachtacht agus a bhaint amach ceart neartú,,pt,Beidh an Gradam Odair Firmino Dlúthpháirtíochta taithí atá ag ceann amháin nó níos mó díobh seo a leanas a roghnú,,pt,cuimsiú sóisialta grúpaí daonra i staideanna leochaileachta sóisialta,,pt,b,,en, no ano de 2013, nesta quarta edição, estará relacionado com o tema: Soberania Alimentar e Solidariedade: alternativas para as desigualdades sociais. A temática busca trazer à tona algumas das questões que são latentes no que diz respeito à soberania alimentar enquanto proposta de superação da pobreza extrema e as desigualdades sociais, além das iniciativas de pessoas, grupos e /ou rede que incentivam o protagonismo e o fortalecimento na efetivação e conquista de direitos.
 b) gníomhaíochtaí táirgiúil nó eastóscach atá dírithe ar chur chun cinn agus bithéagsúlacht a athbhunú,,pt,c,,en,bochtaineacht agus gníomhartha a shárú fostaíochta agus ioncaim tríd an Dlúthpháirtíochta Coitianta Geilleagar a ghiniúint,,pt,d,,en,iúl agus cur chun cinn le rannpháirtíocht na ngrúpaí leochaileacha sna taispeántais,,pt,joints agus struggles eagraíochtaí na sochaí sibhialta,,pt,gníomhartha rannpháirtíocht ghrúpaí eagraithe a chur chun cinn i dtógáil na saoránachta,,pt,beartais phoiblí maidir le slándáil bia agus / nó a déanfar feidhmiú an rialaithe sóisialta de na beartais,,pt,f,,en;
 f) a chur chun cinn tomhaltas eiticiúla agus dlúthpháirtíocht d'fhonn patrúin iompraíochta a athrú a chuireann ar chumas caidrimh nua idir táirgeadh,,pt,tomhaltas agus nádúr,,pt,tionscnaimh oiliúna i réimse na slándála bia agus flaitheas,,pt,meas na réigiúin agus a sainiúlachtaí cultúrtha,,pt,Is iad i réimse,,pt,i imeall nó beag bardais maidir le éagsúlacht inscne,,pt,eitneach nó creidimh,,pt,Caibidil III - CLÁRÚCHÁIN AGUS SPRIOCDHÁTAÍ,,pt,Déanfar an clárúchán a bheith saor in aisce agus beidh sé ar siúl ó,,pt,ó Mheitheamh go,,pt,tríd an idirlíon,,en,trí r-phost,,pt,nó chuig an seoladh,,pt,SGAN Quadra,,pt,MODÚL F / ASA NORTH / Brasilia - DF / CEP,,pt,Beidh siad in ann dul san iomaíocht do Dhuais,,pt,grúpaí,,es, consumo e natureza.
 Art. 6o. Tar éis an roghnú deireanach de thaithí,,pt,Beidh tú a iarrfar cóipeanna díobh seo a leanas,,pt,I - eintitis a comhdhéanta go dlíthiúil,,pt,stádas na heagraíochta,,pt,miontuairiscí an toghcháin bhoird seo caite,,pt,Cárta Xerox ID Cánach,,pt,II - I gcás grúpaí pobail nach comhdhéanta go dlíthiúil,,pt,dearbhú,,pt,nó litir i láthair eintiteas dlíthiúil,,pt,comhlachas,,pt,tréadach,,en,dheoise,,en,aontas,,es,etc comharchumann,,pt,chun an t-eolas taithí a dheimhniú,,pt,Caibidil IV - COINNÍOLLACHA DO CHLÁRÚ,,pt,An próiseas iarratais na turgnaimh ceanglais seo a leanas,,pt,D'fhéadfadh trialacha áitiúil amháin a iontráil,,pt,Féadfaidh gach rannpháirtí ach taithí amháin a chur isteach,,pt, será solicitada cópia dos seguintes documentos:
 c) Ní mór na comharthaí a dhéanamh le taithí daoine nó eintiteas,,pt,féach,,es,an gníomh clárúcháin,,pt,Ní gá duit chun doiciméid bhreise ag gabháil,,pt,ní bheidh aon clárúcháin a chuirtear le facs,,pt,§ 1o,,en,Níl an eagrú Odair Firmino Dlúthpháirtíochta Gradam freagrach as iarratas ar chlárú nach bhfuil a fuarthas as ríomhairí ar chúiseanna teicniúla,,pt,§ 2o,,en,Tá sé intuigthe clárú glacadh coinníollacha go léir atá sa Rialachán seo,,pt,De rogha Duais an Tionscnóra ar Odair Firmino Dlúthpháirtíochta,,pt. (ver Art. 4o)
 Art. 8o. A critério da Entidade promotora do Prêmio Odair Firmino de Solidariedade, Is féidir iad a iarraidh faisnéis agus cáipéisí breise a chruthaíonn an fhreagracht maidir le forfheidhmiú na taithí,,pt,Caibidil V - ROGHNÚ EISPÉIRIS,,pt,Déanfar an rogha a fhorbairt sna céimeanna seo a leanas,,pt,I - daingniú na inscríbhinní,,pt,ag an Dámhachtain Coiste Eagraithe,,pt,iontrálacha a rinneadh i gcomhréir le forálacha an Rialacháin,,pt,II - roghnú Réigiúnach de thaithí,,pt,sna cúig réigiún gheografacha,,pt,ag grúpa oibre comhdhéanta de thriúr ball,,pt,faoi chomhordú na Caritas réigiúnacha,,pt,Tuigtear go maith,,pt,ionadaí ar cheann de na fóraim nó téamach comh réigiúnacha,,pt.
 b) ionadaí gníomhaireacht rialtais ar théama an Gradam do,,pt,ina bhall den chomhalta Tréadach Sóisialta nó Fóram fhlaitheas agus Slándáil Bhia,,pt,III - fhoireann náisiúnta na n-eispéireas roghnaithe agus cuireadh ar aghaidh chuig an Duais Dlúthpháirtíochta Firmino Jury Odair Náisiúnta,,pt,Féadfaidh na taithí a roghnaíodh sa chéim roimhe teagmháil le haghaidh faisnéise breise,,pt,I gcás an cheathrú eagrán de na Duais Odair Firmino,,pt,bhliain,,pt,an Réigiúnach Caritas leanas atá ainmnithe le bheith freagrach as comhordú a dhéanamh ar réamh-roghnaithe sna réigiúin,,pt,I,,en,Diocesan Caritas Manaus,,pt,an réigiún thuaidh,,pt,Oirthuaisceart Caritas Réigiúnach,,pt,an Idir Oirthuaisceart,,pt,III,,en,Caritas Réigiúnach Minas Gerais,,pt 2013;
 III. Cáritas Regional Minas Gerais (an Idir-réigiúnach Oirdheisceart,,pt,IV,,en,Caritas Réigiúnach Santa Catarina,,pt,an Deisceart Idir-réigiúnach,,pt,V,,ru,Caritas Rúnaíocht Náisiúnta,,es,na réigiúin eile,,pt,Caibidil VI - AN SCEIDEAL,,pt,Beidh an Gradam Odair Firmino Dlúthpháirtíochta chun an sceideal seo a leanas,,pt,ag fáil thaithí,,pt,DE15 a30 Lúnasa,,es,réamhroghnúcháin de thaithí i réigiúin gheografacha,,pt,DE01 A15 Meán Fómhair,,pt,roghnú na turgnaimh ag an Giúiré Náisiúnta,,pt,searmanas bronnta,,pt,Caibidil VII - GIÚIRÉ,,pt,An Duais Náisiúnta Ghiúiré Odair Firmino Dlúthpháirtíochta,,pt,do eagarthóireacht,,pt,Tá sé comhdhéanta de,,pt,sé,,es,ionadaithe,,es,Deineadh na critéir seo a leanas,,pt,ionadaí de chuid an Comhordaithe Náisiúnta na Multirão a comhrac Ocrais,,pt);
 IV. lá 19 de outubro: cerimônia de premiação.
 a) um representante da Coordenação Nacional do Multirão de Combate à Fome; (Comhdháil Náisiúnta na Easpaig na Brasaíle,,gl,triúr ionadaithe na n-eintiteas a bhfuil stair agus taithí chun tacú le tionscadail bheaga,,pt,ionadaí de chuid an Fhóraim Brasaíle ar fhlaitheas agus Slándáil Bhia,,pt,ionadaí de chuid an Aireacht um Fhorbairt Shóisialta agus a Chomhrac Hunger,,pt,MDS,,en,An Duais Náisiúnta Dlúthpháirtíochta Ghiúiré Odair Firmino Tá bhflaitheas in a cuid pléití ar an dámhachtain agus ní bheidh do bhreithiúnas oiriúnach aon chineál acmhainne,,pt,Beidh an triail an turgnaimh a dhéanamh trí scór,,pt,i A10 DE01 scála forásach,,pt,as na táscairí seo a leanas,,pt,Rannpháirtíocht an phobail i taithí,,pt,Athruithe sóisialta a tugadh faoi sa phobal,,pt,comhpháirtíochtaí agus naisc le grúpaí eile nó gníomhaithe sóisialta,,pt);
 d) poitéinseal iolrú togra,,pt,rannpháirtíocht do chultúr na dlúthpháirtíochta,,pt,rannpháirtíochta i dtógáil na mbeartas poiblí agus rialú sóisialta,,pt,g,,en,cinn na héagsúlachta cultúrtha agus féiniúlachtaí,,pt,cosaint agus cur chun cinn cearta agus / nó sociobiodiversity,,pt,i,,en,caidreamh inscne,,pt,cine,,pt,giniúint nó eitneachas,,pt,j,,en,rannchuidiú le neamhionannais a shárú agus flaitheas bia pobail,,pt,dá gach grúpa Oibre dó i mír II ealaíne,,pt,an réigiún geografach,,pt,faoi chomhordú réigiúin Caritas,,pt,roghnaigh,,pt,go,,pt,cúig,,es,a bheidh ina na bun,,pt,twenty-five,,pt,taithí a chur faoi bhráid an Duais Ghiúiré Odair Firmino Dlúthpháirtíochta,,pt,a léiríonn,,es,trí,,pt;
 Art. 16. Cada Grupo de Trabalho de que trata o inciso II do art. da região geográfica, sob coordenação de uma Cáritas da região, selecionará até 05 (cinco) experiências, formando o conjunto de até 25 (vinte e cinco) experiências a serem submetidas ao Júri do Prêmio Odair Firmino de Solidariedade, que indicará 03 (três) experiências ar dtús aicmithe,,pt,an dara agus an tríú áit,,pt,Caibidil VIII - DUAISEANNA,,pt,Beidh an taithí réamh-roghnaithe le cur faoi bhráid an giúiré a fháil ar an dámhachtainí seo a leanas mar aitheantas ar a chuireann siad le cleachtas sóisialta,,pt,teastas rannpháirtíochta sa chomórtas,,pt,foilsiú na n-eispéireas,,pt,trí iris agus físeáin,,pt,i gceannas ar an Caritas eintitis Brasaíle,,pt,Beidh an taithí a bhuaigh a dhámhachtain leis an statuette tsiombail,,pt,Odair Firmino Dlúthpháirtíochta Gradam agus,,pt,gradaim aitheantais a luaitear in Airteagal,,pt,De bhreis ar na duaiseanna atá luaite san Airteagal,,pt,anterior,,en,mar,,en,Beidh an taithí a bhuaigh a bheith clúdaithe leis an leithdháileadh acmhainní chun a dtaithí a neartú,,pt, segundo e terceiro lugar.
 Art. 19. Além dos prêmios mencionados no art. anterior, as 03 (três) experiências vencedoras serão contempladas com destinação de recursos para o fortalecimento da respectiva experiência, ar é a thíolacadh togra acmhainní tionscadail /,,pt,alt amháin,,pt,Na tionscadail dá dtagraítear in Airteagal,,pt,comhdhéanta de na luachanna seo a leanas,,pt,mar aicmiú dámhachtain,,pt,ar dtús,,pt,deich míle reais,,pt,dara,,es,cúig mhíle reais,,pt,Tríú,,pt,trí mhíle reais,,pt,Beidh an searmanas bronnta ar siúl ar,,pt,Deireadh Fómhair,,pt,Ceadaíonn na hoifigigh agus daoine gairmiúla eile a bhfuil baint acu eispéiris roghnaithe agus bronnta,,pt,gan aon chostas,,pt,úsáid a bhaint as an t-ainm,,pt,íomhá agus guth do thaighde nó a scaipeadh in aon mheán,,pt,Tá sé freagrach as an saincheadúnaí eispéiris roghnaithe chomh maith agus bronnadh an úsáid an toradh na trialach chun na gcríoch céanna,,pt.
 Art. 20. A cerimônia de premiação será realizada no dia 19 de outubro de 2013, i Brasilia.
 Caibidil IX - FORÁLACHA GINEARÁLTA,,pt,Déanfar na cásanna a réiteach ag an Gradam Coiste Eagraithe,,pt,a chuimsíonn,,pt,Féadfaidh comhalta den Caritas Réigiúnach MG,,pt,SECNAC ina bhall de Caritas Caritas agus an Bhoird Ball Náisiúnta na,,pt,bhfuil gcinntí faoi críochnaitheacha,,pt,Tá torthaí na trialach,,pt,chomh maith le gach ráiteas oifigiúil a bhaineann leis an Duais Odair Firmino Dlúthpháirtíochta,,pt,Beidh siad a nochtadh sa tairseach,,pt,www.caritas.org.br,,sv,agus blog dámhachtana,,pt,premioodairfirmino.caritas.org.br.s174889.gridserver.com,,es,Brasilia,,pt,meitheamh,,pt.


text:
 19.9.2016
 PL
 Dziennik Urzędowy Unii Europejskiej
 C 343/45
 Skarga wniesiona w dniu 29 lipca 2016 r. – sheepworld/EUIPO (Beste Mama)
 (Sprawa T-422/16)
 (2016/C 343/61)
 Język postępowania: niemiecki
 Strony
 Strona skarżąca: sheepworld AG (Ursensollen, Niemcy) (przedstawiciel: Rechtsanwalt S. von Rüden)
 Strona pozwana: Urząd Unii Europejskiej ds. Własności Intelektualnej (EUIPO)
 Dane dotyczące postępowania przed EUIPO
 Przedmiotowy sporny znak towarowy: Słowny unijny znak towarowy „Beste Mama” – zgłoszenie nr 14 169 304
 Zaskarżona decyzja: Decyzja Czwartej Izby Odwoławczej EUIPO z dnia 13 maja 2016 r. w sprawie R 95/2016-4
 Żądania
 Strona skarżąca wnosi do Sądu o:
 —
 stwierdzenie nieważności zaskarżonej decyzji;
 —
 obciążenie EUIPO kosztami postępowania, w tym kosztami poniesionymi w postępowaniu odwoławczym.
 Podniesiony zarzut
 —
 Naruszenie art. 7 ust. 1 lit. b) rozporządzenia nr 207/2009.


jurisdiction: US

text:
 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
 OF MARYLAND
 __________________________________________
 No. 91
 September Term, 2014
 LINDA A. SENEZ
 v.
 BRADFORD G.Y. CARNEY
 Barbera, C.J.
 Harrell
 Battaglia
 Greene
 Adkins
 McDonald
 Watts,
 JJ.
 PER CURIAM ORDER
 Filed: December 22, 2014
 LINDA A. SENEZ * In the
 * Court of Appeals
 v.
 * of Maryland
 * No. 91
 BRADFORD G.Y. CARNEY * September Term, 2014
 PER CURIAM ORDER
 The Court having considered and granted the petition for a writ of certiorari in the above
 entitled case, it is this 22nd day of December, 2014
 ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the judgment of the Court of
 Special Appeals be, and it is hereby, summarily vacated, and the case is remanded to that Court
 for further consideration in light of Deborah Hiob, et al. v. Progressive American Insurance
 Company, et al., ____ Md.____, ____A.3d____(No. 4, September Term, 2014, filed November 20,
 2014). Costs in this Court to be paid by the Respondent, and costs in the Court of Special
 Appeals to abide the result.
 _____________________________
 Chief Judge


text: b' U.S. Department of Agriculture\n\n Office of Inspector General\n Midwest Region\n\n\n\n\n Audit Report\n\nChild and Adult Care Food Program\n Supper Meals Served in Schools\n\n\n\n\n Report No. 27601-35-Ch\n July 2006\n\x0c\x0cRoberto Salazar 2\n\n\nwhich are now offered in seven States. 3 Since 1978, the CACFP served supper meals to children\nthat attended Outside-School-Hours centers, but unlike suppers served in At-Risk areas, the\ncenters were reimbursed different amounts 4 based on a child\xe2\x80\x99s eligibility for a free or reduced-\nprice meal. In addition, supper meals served to children through the At-Risk care component of\nthe CACFP can be provided by a school food authority, already authorized to participate in the\nNSLP, or an outside organization authorized under CACFP.\n\nBoth the NSLP and CACFP offer children nutritious meals throughout the day. While the NSLP\nprovides meals in a school atmosphere for school aged children up to 18 years old, the CACFP\noffers its meals in a daycare setting for children 12 years of age or younger. The meal component\nrequirements (meat, bread, milk, and two servings of fruits and/or vegetables) are essentially the\nsame for both programs, except that under NSLP a school may implement an offer versus serve\nmeal serving option.\n\nIn our prior audit of the Chicago Public Schools, which operated as a CACFP At-Risk center, we\nfound that 78 percent more supper meals were counted than met requirements. Specifically, the\nschools implemented the NSLP\xe2\x80\x99s offer versus serve meal serving option that allows a child to\ndecline up to two menu items. 5 However, the CACFP requires that a child take all menu items\nfor that meal to be reimbursable. The improper claim was directly related to Chicago Public\nSchools not following State requirements. We found that the State agency prohibited the use of\noffer versus serve for supper because they were not sure whether that NSLP meal serving option\napplied to suppers served under the CACFP. The FNS Midwest regional office confirmed the\nState agency\xe2\x80\x99s position in a letter stating that the offer versus serve option cannot be used for At-\nRisk suppers and all menu items must be taken.\n\nOBJECTIVE\n\nThe objective of this audit was to evaluate FNS\xe2\x80\x99 requirements for and oversight of CACFP\nsuppers served in schools operated as Outside-School-Hours and At-Risk centers.\n\nSCOPE AND METHODOLOGY\n\nWe performed the audit at the FNS National Office in Alexandria, Virginia, and contacted FNS\nofficials at the agency\xe2\x80\x99s seven regional locations. During fiscal year 2005, there were 35 million\nsupper meals (valued at over $70 million) served in all centers nationwide, which included child\nand adult day care centers and schools. Since FNS did not have detailed State-level information\non suppers served in schools, we collected information from all 50 States and determined the\nnumber of sponsors, sites, and supper meals served. We calculated that there were nearly\n10 million supper meals (valued about $21 million) served in schools for about\n\n3\n The Agriculture Risk Protection Act of 2000, Public Law 106-224, approved four States; (1) Delaware, (2) Michigan, (3) Missouri, and (4)\nPennsylvania. In 2001, Illinois was added through The Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies\nAppropriations Act, 2002, Public Law 107-76. Two States, New York and Oregon, were selected through approval of the Secretary of\nAgriculture through a competitive application process.\n4\n Daycare homes and centers receive different levels of reimbursement per meal based on a child\xe2\x80\x99s eligibility for a free, reduced-price, or paid\nmeal determined from the parents\xe2\x80\x99 income.\n5\n Offer versus serve under the nutrient standard menu planning approach requires schools to offer at least three menu items and students to take\nthe entr\xc3\xa9e and one other item and decline up to two items; under the food-based menu planning approach schools must offer all five required\nmenu items and students may decline up to two menu items. (See 7 CFR 210.10)\n\x0cRoberto Salazar 3\n\n\n216 Outside-School-Hours and 774 At-Risk centers nationwide for fiscal year 2005. We\nconducted audit fieldwork from November 2005 through March 2006.\n\nTo accomplish our objectives, we: (1) reviewed pertinent Federal regulations, policy, and\nguidance, and previous audits performed by the Government Accountability Office and the\nOffice of Inspector General, (2) interviewed FNS National, regional, and selected State officials\nto discuss program policy and procedures, and (3) obtained program data that included the\nnumber of supper meals claimed for Outside-School-Hours and At-Risk centers by State from\nOctober 2004 through September 2005. This audit was performed in accordance with\nGovernment Auditing Standards.\n\nFINDING AND RECOMMENDATIONS\n\nAdditional Guidance is Needed for CACFP Suppers Served in Schools\n\nOur review found that FNS regional and State officials interpreted CACFP meal requirements\ndifferently than the FNS National Office. FNS had not developed regulations or issued adequate\nguidance on the supper meal requirements for meals served in schools. As a result, there was no\nconsistency in either the implementation of supper meals or in the determination of whether\nthose meals were properly claimed.\n\nFederal regulations 6 for CACFP suppers require schools to use a meal pattern that requires five\nmenu items including: milk, a meat (or meat alternative), two or more vegetables and/or fruits,\nand a bread (or bread alternative). CACFP requires that a child take all menu items for that meal\nto be reimbursable. However, a State agency may allow schools participating in the NSLP to\nsubstitute the meal pattern requirements of the regulations governing NSLP. 7 The meal pattern\nrequirements for the NSLP allow an offer versus serve meal serving option, in which a child may\ndecline up to two menu items. Federal regulations 8 do not specifically mention an offer versus\nserve provision for supper except that, at the discretion of the adult day care center, adult\nparticipants may decline one of the menu items.\n\nOur review disclosed that FNS did not issue guidance on the meal requirements for suppers\nserved in schools, whether in Outside-School-Hours or At-Risk centers. The guidance FNS did\nissue related to At-Risk snacks, and we were initially informed by FNS officials that the At-Risk\nsnack requirements also applied to suppers. However, FNS officials indicated that separate rules\nand guidance are necessary for suppers, since we identified that the guidance issued for At-Risk\nsnacks did not allow the offer versus serve option. Due to the absence of supper regulations and\nguidance, FNS regional and State offices may have inadvertently imposed a restriction on its\nschools by not allowing the offer versus serve option in serving suppers.\n\nIn discussions with FNS regional officials, we found that six of the seven regional officials stated\nthat supper is a component of CACFP, and therefore, schools must follow CACFP meal\n\n6\n 7 CFR 226.20 (a).\n7\n 7 CFR 226.20 (o).\n8\n 7 CFR 226.20 paragraphs (o) and (q). Paragraph (o) does not mention offer versus serve and paragraph (q) titled offer versus serve refers only\nto adult day care centers.\n\x0cRoberto Salazar 4\n\n\nrequirements. When asked whether offer versus serve was an option for suppers, six of the seven\nregions stated that it was not an option. FNS regional officials stated that the CACFP\nregulations 9 did not specifically allow the use of offer versus serve, except for adult day care\ncenters. Although one region stated that offer versus serve was an option for CACFP supper, as a\nresult of our questioning they did contact the FNS National Office for clarification. The FNS\nNational Office, in an e-mail to three of its seven regions confirmed that: State agencies may\nallow centers that belong to both the NSLP and CACFP to implement the offer versus serve\noption in serving supper meals in schools.\n\nWe also found that two State agency directors interpreted supper meal requirements differently\nthan the FNS National Office. This led to problems in determining whether a supper meal was\nreimbursable at one large center. As noted in our audit 10 of Chicago Public Schools (the second\nlargest At-Risk center nationwide), the Illinois State agency had a written policy for CACFP\nmeal requirements, which stated that a student must receive all menu items for a supper to be\nconsidered as a reimbursable meal. We determined that Chicago did not follow those\nrequirements and that 78 percent more supper meals were counted than met requirements. In\nNew Jersey, which provides program oversight of the Newark Public Schools (the largest\nOutside-School-Hours center in the nation), a State agency official stated that supper meals must\nfollow CACFP meal requirements. However, the State agency did not document whether that\npolicy applied to centers that operated both the NSLP and CACFP. Therefore, if during the State\nagency\xe2\x80\x99s reviews of its centers, it found that some centers followed CACFP while others\nfollowed NSLP meal requirements, it would not be able to enforce only CACFP requirements\nsince regulations can be interpreted to allow both.\n\nDuring fiscal year 2005, there were about 10 million supper meals (worth over $21 million)\nserved in schools; and during the last 3 years the number of supper meals claimed at At-Risk\ncenters has risen over 36 percent. Since the authorization of the At-Risk provision in fiscal year\n2000, we found that FNS had not issued regulations or guidance on the meal requirements for\nsuppers. FNS officials stated that they had supper regulations, but they were still in draft form\nand not available for our review. The discrepancy of the supper meal requirements between a\nState and local school correspond with the different interpretations between FNS offices. FNS\nNational officials agreed that they needed to issue additional guidance on meal patterns for the\nsuppers served in schools.\n\nRecommendation 1\n\nIssue guidance to all regions and States on the CACFP supper meal requirements and the use\nof the offer versus serve option.\n\nAgency Response\n\nIn its response dated, June 22, 2006, FNS agreed with our recommendation and stated that\nguidance for the CACFP supper meal requirements and the offer versus serve option will be\n\n\n9\n 7 CFR 226.20 (o) and (q).\n10\n Audit 27010-0017-Ch, Chicago SFA\xe2\x80\x99s Accountability and Oversight of the NSLP, SBP, and CACFP Supper (Sept. 2004).\n\x0cRoberto Salazar 5\n\n\ncompleted by July 31, 2006. The guidance will be posted on the FNS Partnerweb, which is\navailable to all CACFP State agencies and FNS regional offices.\n\nOIG Position\n\nWe accept FNS\xe2\x80\x99 management decision. For final action, FNS officials need to inform the OCFO\nonce the guidance is completed and posted, and all CACFP State agency and FNS regional\nofficials are notified about the guidance.\n\nRecommendation 2\n\nProvide a time-phased action plan on either the development or amendment of regulations\nrelated to supper meals served in schools.\n\nAgency Response\n\nIn its response dated, June 22, 2006, FNS agreed with our recommendation and stated that it\nexpects to publish two rules on the At-Risk components of the CACFP. The agency anticipates\nthat the final At-Risk snack rule to be published by February 28, 2007, and the proposed rule for\nafterschool meals (i.e. supper) would be published no later than April 30, 2007. The final supper\nrule should be published during calendar year 2008.\n\nOIG Position\n\nWe accept FNS\xe2\x80\x99 management decision. For final action, FNS officials need to inform the OCFO\nwhen the final supper rule is published.\n\nWe appreciate the courtesies and cooperation extended to our staff during this review.\n\x0cExhibit A \xe2\x80\x93 Agency Response\n Exhibit A \xe2\x80\x93 Page 1 of 2\n\x0cExhibit A \xe2\x80\x93 Agency Response\n Exhibit A \xe2\x80\x93 Page 2 of 2\n\x0cInformational copies of this report have been distributed to:\n\nAgency Liaison Officer (8)\nGovernment Accountability Office (1)\nOffice of Management and Budget (1)\nOffice of the Chief Financial Officer\n Director, Planning and Accountability Division (1)\n\x0c'


type: contracts

text:
 Avviż Legali Importanti
 |
 22004D0016
 Official Journal L 127 , 29/04/2004 P. 0116 - 0117
 Deċiżjoni tal-Kumitat Konġunt taż-ŻEENru 16/2004tad-19 ta' Marzu 2004li temenda l-Anness I (Materji veterinarji u fitosanitarji) tal-Ftehim taż-ŻEEIL-KUMITAT KONĠUNT TAŻ-ŻEE,Wara li kkunsidra l-Ftehim dwar iż-Żona Ekonomika Ewropea, kif emendat bil-Protokoll li jadatta l-Ftehim dwar iż-Żona Ekonomika Ewropea, hawnhekk iżjed 'il quddiem imsejjaħ "il-Ftehim", partikolarment l-Artikolu 98 ta' dan,Billi:(1) L-Anness I tal-Ftehim kien emendat bid-Deċiżjoni tal-Kumitat Konġunt taż-ŻEE Nru 169/2003 tal-5 ta' Diċembru 2003 [1].(2) Id-Direttiva tal-Kummissjoni 2003/45/KE tat-28 ta' Mejju 2003 li temenda d-Direttiva tal-Kunsill 2002/57/KE dwar il-marketing (reklamar) taż-żerriegħa ta' pjanti tal-fibra u taż-żejt [2] għandha tkun inkorporata fil-Ftehim,IDDEĊIEDA DAN LI ĠEJ:Artikolu 1L-inċiż li ġej għandu jkun miżjud f'punt 13 (Direttiva tal-Kunsill 2002/57/KE) f'Parti 1 tal-Kapitolu III ta' l-Anness I tal-Ftehim:"- 32003 L 0045: Id-Direttiva tal-Kummissjoni 2003/45/KE tat-28 ta' Mejju 2003 (ĠU L 138, tal-5.6.2003, p. 40)."Artikolu 2It-testi tad-Direttiva 2003/45/KE bil-lingwa Islandiża u Norveġiża, li se jkunu ppubblikati fis-Suppliment taż-ŻEE fil-Ġurnal Uffiċjali ta' l-Unjoni Ewropea, għandhom ikunu awtentiċi.Artikolu 3Din id-Deċiżjoni għandha tidħol fis-seħħ fl-20 ta' Marzu 2004, iżda n-notifiki kollha skond l-Artikolu 103(1) tal-Ftehim ikunu saru lill-Kumitat Konġunt taż-ŻEE [3].Artikolu 4Din id-Deċiżjoni għandha tkun ippubblikata fit-Taqsima taż-ŻEE ta', u fis-Suppliment taż-ŻEE fil-Ġurnal Uffiċjali ta' l-Unjoni Ewropea.Magħmul fi Brussel, fid-19 ta' Marzu 2004.Għall-Kumitat Konġunt taż-ŻEEIl-PresidentP. Westerlund[1] ĠU L 88, tal-25.3.2003, p. 39.[2] ĠU L 138, tal-5.6.2003, p. 40.[3] Ma hemmx ħtiġijiet kostituzzjonali indikati.--------------------------------------------------


text:
Náhradná starostlivosť | Advokát na rodinné právo a rozvody - JUDr. Jarmila Zahradníková
 Náhradnú osobnú starostlivosť upravujú § 45, §46 a §47 zákona č. 36/2005 Z. z. zákon o rodine.Ak to vyžaduje záujem maloletého dieťaťa, súd môže zveriť maloleté dieťa do náhradnej osobnej starostlivosti. Osobou, ktorej možno maloleté dieťa takto zveriť, sa môže stať len fyzická osoba:
 1. s trvalým pobytom na území Slovenskej republiky,
 2. ktorá má spôsobilosť na právne úkony v plnom rozsahu,
 3. osobné predpoklady, a to najmä:
 a. zdravotné,
 c. spôsobom svojho života a života osôb, ktoré s ňou žijú v domácnosti, zaručuje, že bude náhradnú osobnú starostlivosť vykonávať v záujme maloletého dieťaťa.
 Osoba, ktorej bolo maloleté dieťa zverené do náhradnej osobnej starostlivosti, je povinná vykonávať osobnú starostlivosť o maloleté dieťa v rovnakom rozsahu, v akom ju vykonávajú rodičia.
 Právo zastupovať maloleté dieťa a spravovať jeho majetok má iba v bežných veciach. Ak táto osoba predpokladá, že rozhodnutie zákonného zástupcu maloletého dieťaťa v podstatných veciach nie je v súlade so záujmom maloletého dieťaťa, môže sa domáhať, aby túto otázku pri konkrétnom rozhodnutí zákonného zástupcu preskúmal súd.
 Rodičia maloletého dieťaťa vykonávajú práva a povinnosti vyplývajúce z rodičovských práv a povinností len v rozsahu, v akom nepatria osobe, ktorej bolo maloleté dieťa zverené do náhradnej osobnej starostlivosti. Rodičia majú tiež právo stýkať sa s maloletým dieťaťom. Ak sa s osobou, ktorej bolo maloleté dieťa takto zverené, nedohodnú o výkone tohto práva, rozhodne na návrh niektorého z rodičov alebo tejto osoby súd.
 Vyživovacia povinnosť rodičov voči maloletému dieťaťu rozhodnutím súdu nezaniká. Súd pri rozhodovaní o zverení maloletého dieťaťa do náhradnej osobnej starostlivosti určí rodičom alebo iným fyzickým osobám povinným poskytovať maloletému dieťaťu výživné rozsah ich vyživovacej povinnosti a súčasne im uloží povinnosť, aby výživné poukazovali osobe, ktorej bolo maloleté dieťa zverené do náhradnej osobnej starostlivosti.
 Maloleté dieťa možno zveriť:
 1. do spoločnej náhradnej osobnej starostlivosti manželom,
 2. do náhradnej osobnej starostlivosti jednému z manželov so súhlasom druhého manžela (Súhlas nie je potrebný, ak manželia nežijú v spoločnej domácnosti, ak druhý manžel nemá spôsobilosť na právne úkony v plnom rozsahu, alebo ak zadováženie súhlasu je spojené s ťažko prekonateľnou prekážkou.)
 f) rozvodom manželov, ktorým bolo maloleté dieťa zverené do spoločnej náhradnej osobnej starostlivosti.
 Ak zanikla náhradná osobná starostlivosť rozvodom manželov a rodičia maloletého dieťaťa naďalej nezabezpečujú, alebo nemôžu zabezpečiť osobnú starostlivosť o maloleté dieťa, súd môže na návrh jedného z bývalých manželov, ktorým bolo maloleté dieťa zverené do spoločnej náhradnej osobnej starostlivosti, ponechať maloleté dieťa v jeho osobnej starostlivosti, ak je to v záujme maloletého dieťaťa, najmä s ohľadom na jeho citové väzby a stabilitu výchovného prostredia. Návrh môže jeden z manželov podať zároveň s návrhom na rozvod.


text:
 19.10.2013
 MT
 Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali tal-Unjoni Ewropea
 C 304/4
 Talba għal deċiżjoni preliminari mressqa mill-Kúria (l-Ungerija) fl-20 ta’ Ġunju 2013 — Almos Agrárkülkereskedelmi Kft. vs Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Közép-magyarországi Regionális Adó Főigazgatósága
 (Kawża C-337/13)
 2013/C 304/06
 Lingwa tal-kawża: l-Ungeriż
 Qorti tar-rinviju
 Kúria
 Partijiet fil-kawża prinċipali
 Rikorrenti: Almos Agrárkülkereskedelmi Kft.
 Konvenut: Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Közép-magyarországi Regionális Adó Főigazgatósága
 Domandi preliminari
 (1)
 Id-dispożizzjonijiet tal-Artikolu 77(1) u (2) tal-Liġi CXXVII tal-2007 dwar il-VAT, fil-verżjoni tagħhom fis-seħħ sal-31 ta’ Diċembru 2010, huma kompatibbli ma’ dawk tal-Artikolu 90(1) tad-Direttiva tal-Kunsill 2006/112/KE, tat-28 ta’ Novembru 2006, dwar is-sistema komuni ta' taxxa fuq il-valur miżjud (1) (iktar ’il quddiem id-“Direttiva tal-VAT”), fis-sens li l-liġi Ungeriża dwar il-VAT tkopri l-possibbiltajiet kollha ta’ tnaqqis tal-valur taxxabbli elenkati f’din id-dispożizzjoni?
 (2)
 Jekk dan ma huwiex il-każ, persuna taxxabbli li, wara t-twettiq ta’ tranżazzjoni, ma kisbitx il-korrispettiv ta’ din tal-aħħar, tista’ titlob, fin-nuqqas ta’ dispożizzjoni tad-dritt nazzjonali f’dan ir-rigward, tnaqqis tat-taxxa abbażi tal-prinċipji ta’ newtralità tat-taxxa u ta’ proporzjonalità, fid-dawl tad-dispożizzjonijiet tal-Artikolu 90(1) tad-Direttiva tal-VAT?
 (3)
 Jekk l-Artikolu 90(1) tad-Direttiva tal-VAT għandu effett dirett, il-possibbiltà li jiġi eżerċitat id-dritt għal tnaqqis fiskali hija għaldaqstant suġġetta għal liema kundizzjonijiet? Huwa biżżejjed li l-bejjiegħ ikun ħareġ fattura ta’ rettifika u li jkun bagħatha lix-xerrej jew huwa wkoll neċessarju li huwa jagħti prova li l-oġġett kien effettivament sar mill-ġdid proprjetà tiegħu, fis-sens li dan ikun materjalment ingħatalu lura?
 (4)
 Fil-każ ta’ risposta negattiva għat-tielet domanda, l-Istat Membru huwa obbligat, abbażi tad-dritt Komunitarju, li jikkumpensa d-dannu li jirriżulta minn nuqqas ta’ twettiq tal-obbligu ta’ armonizzazzjoni tiegħu li b’konsegwenza tiegħu l-persuna taxxabbli ġiet miċħuda mill-possibbiltà li tibbenefika minn tnaqqis fiskali?
 (5)
 L-Artikolu 90(2) tad-Direttiva tal-VAT jista’ jinftiehem fis-sens li l-Istati Membri jżommu d-dritt, fil-każ ta’ nuqqas ta’ ħlas totali jew parzjali, li ma jagħtux tnaqqis tal-valur taxxabbli u, jekk iva, għal dan huwa neċessarju li dispożizzjoni legali nazzjonali tkun espressament eskludiet il-possibbiltà ta’ tali tnaqqis, jew jista’ jitqies li s-silenzju fuq dan il-punt fil-leġiżlazzjoni nazzjonali tawtorizzahom ukoll jirrifjutaw it-tnaqqis inkwistjoni?
 (1) ĠU L 347, p. 1.


text:
 28.3.2022
 GA
 Iris Oifigiúil an Aontais Eorpaigh
 C 138/11
 Caingean arna tabhairt an 3 Eanáir 2022 – Loutsou v EUIPO (POLIS LOUTRON)
 (Cás T-13/22)
 (2022/C 138/25)
 Teanga an cháis: an Ghréigis
 Páirtithe
 Iarratasóir: Alexandra Loutsou (Thessaloniki, an Ghréig) (ionadaí: S. Psomakakis, dlíodóir)
 Cosantóir: Oifig Maoine Intleachtúla an Aontais Eorpaigh (EUIPO)
 Sonraí na n-imeachtaí os comhair EUIPO
 Trádmharc atá faoi cheist: Marc fíortha de chuid an Aontais Eorpaigh ina bhfuil na gnéithe focail “POLIS LOUTRON” – Iarratas ar chlárú Uimh. 18 144 809
 Cinneadh atá faoi chonspóid: Cinneadh ón gcéad Bhord Achomhairc de EUIPO an 20 Deireadh Fómhair i gcás R 544/2020-1
 An t-ordú atá á lorg
 Iarrann an t-iarratasóir ar an gCúirt Ghinearálta:
 —
 an t-iarratas seo a cheadú;
 —
 an cinneadh atá faoi chonspóid a chur ar neamhní;
 —
 a dhearbhú go bhfuil an t-achomharc i gcoinne an gcinnidh ón gCéad Bhord Achomhairc de EUIPO i gcás R 544/2020-1, a bhaineann le hiarratas ar thrádmharc de chuid an Aontais Eorpaigh Uimh. 18 144 809 a chlárú inghlactha agus go bhfuil bunús maith leis;
 —
 Cinneadh Uimh. L 110an 8 Samhain 2019 maidir le fógra na bhforas diúltaithe d’iarratas ar thrádmharc de chuid an Aontais Eorpaigh Uimh. 18144809 a chur ar neamhní go páirteach, chun seasamh leis an iarratas i dtrácht ina iomláine agus chun an trádmharc i dtrácht a chlárú mar shainchomhartha ar tháirgí agus ar sheirbhísí an iarratasóra laistigh de chríoch an Aontais Eorpaigh le haghaidh aicmiú na n-aicmí arna n-éileamh;
 —
 Cinneadh Uimh. L 123an 20 Eanáir 2020 maidir le diúltú d’iarratas ar thrádmharc de chuid an Aontais Eorpaigh Uimh. 18144809 a chur ar neamhní go páirteach, chun seasamh leis an iarratas i dtrácht ina iomláine agus chun an trádmharc i dtrácht a chosaint mar shainchomhartha ar tháirgí agus ar sheirbhísí an iarratasóra laistigh de chríoch an Aontais Eorpaigh le haghaidh aicmiú na n-aicmí arna n-éileamh;
 —
 a ordú don chosantóir riaracháin, Oifig Maoine Intleachtúla an Aontais Eorpaigh, an trádmharc POLIS LOUTRON a chosaint maidir leis na haicmí go léir arna n-éileamh agus na hearraí agus seirbhísí go léir arna n-iarr;
 —
 a ordú don chosantóir na costais a íoc.
 Saincheist dlí arna maíomh
 Leis an gcinneadh atá faoi chonspóid, léiríodh agus cuireadh i bhfeidhm go mícheart forálacha Airteagal 7(1)(b) agus (c), de Rialachán (AE) 2017/1001 ó Pharlaimint na hEorpa agus ón gComhairle an 14 Meitheamh 2017 a mhéid, maidir le trádmharc de chuid an Aontais Eorpaigh, mar is amhlaidh i gcás an trádmharc atá i gceist, nach bhfuil aon chineál tuairisciúil ná easpa sainiúlachta ann agus, dá bhrí sin, nach bhfuil aon fhoras ann diúltú don trádmharc a chlárú le haghaidh na n-aicmí arna n-éileamh agus na seirbhísí a bhaineann leis na haicmí sin.


text:
processo: C-708/17
 N.o Processo: C-708/17 • 05 Dez. 2019
 artigo 10.°, n.° 1 práticas comerciais desleais das empresas face aos consumidores no ... conceito de “consumidor”
 1) O artigo 27.° da Diretiva 2011/83/UE do Parlamento Europeu e do Conselho, de 25 de outubro de 2011, relativa aos direitos dos consumidores, que altera a Diretiva 93/13/CEE do Conselho e a Diretiva 1999/44/CE do Parlamento Europeu e do Conselho e que revoga a Diretiva 85/577/CEE do Conselho e a Diretiva 97/7/CE do Parlamento Europeu e do Conselho, conjugado com o artigo 5.°, n. os 1 e 5, da Diretiva 2005/29/CE do Parlamento Europeu e do Conselho, de 11 de maio de 2005, relativa às pr...
 N.o Processo: C-708/17 • 30 Abril 2019
 CONCLUSÕES DO ADVOGADO‐GERAL HENRIK SAUGMANDSGAARD ØE apresentadas em 30 de abril de 2019 1 Processos apensos C ‐ 708/17 e C ‐ 725/17 «EVN Bulgaria Toplofikatsia» EAD contra Nikolina Stefanova Dimitrova [pedido de decisão prejudicial apresentado pelo Rayonen sad Asenovgrad (Tribunal Regional de Asenovgrad, Bulgária)] e «Toplofikatsia Sofia» EAD contra Mitko Simeonov Dimitrov, com intervenção de: «Termokomplekt» OOD [pedido de decisão prejudicial apre...
 C-708/17
 artigo 10.°, n.° 1 práticas comerciais desleais das empresas face aos consumidores no ... conceito de “consumidor” artigo 3.°, n.° 1 diretiva 2012/27/ue
 N.o Processo: C-708/17
 1) O artigo 27.° da Diretiva 2011/83/UE do Parlamento Europeu e do Conselho, de 25 de outubro de 2011, relativa aos direitos dos consumidores, que altera a Diretiva 93/13/CEE do Conselho e a Diretiva 1999/44/CE do Parlamento Europeu e do Conselho e que revoga a Diretiva 85/577/CEE do Conselho e a Diretiva 97/7/CE do Parlamento Europeu e do Conselho, conjugado com o artigo 5.°, n. os 1 e 5, da Diretiva 2005/29/CE do Parlamento Europeu e do Conselho, de 11 de maio de 2005, relativa às práticas comerciais desleais das empresas face aos consumidores no mercado interno e que altera a Diretiva 84/450/CEE do Conselho, as Diretivas 97/7/CE, 98/27/CE e 2002/65/CE e o Regulamento (CE) n.° 2006/2004 («Diretiva relativa às Práticas Comerciais Desleais»), deve ser interpretado no sentido de que não se opõe a uma regulamentação nacional que prevê que os proprietários de um apartamento num edifício em regime de propriedade horizontal ligado a uma rede de aquecimento urbano estão obrigados a contribuir para as despesas relativas ao consumo de energia térmica das partes comuns e da instalação interior do edifício, apesar de não terem solicitado individualmente o fornecimento do aquecimento e de não o utilizarem no seu apartamento. 2) O artigo 13.°, n.° 2, da Diretiva 2006/32/CE do Parlamento Europeu e do Conselho, de 5 de abril de 2006, relativa à eficiência na utilização final de energia e aos serviços energéticos e que revoga a Diretiva 93/76/CEE do Conselho, e o artigo 10.°, n.° 1, da Diretiva 2012/27/UE do Parlamento Europeu e do Conselho, de 25 de outubro de 2012, relativa à eficiência energética, que altera as Diretivas 2009/125/CE e 2010/30/UE e revoga as Diretivas 2004/8/CE e 2006/32/CE, devem ser interpretados no sentido de que não se opõem a uma regulamentação nacional que prevê que, num edifício detido em regime de propriedade horizontal, as faturas relativas ao consumo de energia térmica da instalação interior sejam emitidas, para cada proprietário de um apartamento no edifício, proporcionalmente ao volume aquecido do seu apartamento.
 Edição provisória ACÓRDÃO DO TRIBUNAL DE JUSTIÇA (Quarta Secção) 5 de dezembro de 2019 ( * ) «Reenvio prejudicial — Proteção dos consumidores — Diretiva 2011/83 /UE — Direito dos consumidores — Artigo 2.°, n.° 1 — Conceito de “consumidor” — Artigo 3.°, n.° 1 — Contrato celebrado entre um profissional e um consumidor — Contrato relativo ao fornecimento de aquecimento urbano — Artigo 27.° — Fornecimento não solicitado — Diretiva 2005/29 /CE — Práticas comerciais desleais das empresas face aos consumidores no mercado interno — Artigo 5.° — Proibição de práticas comerciais desleais — Anexo I — Fornecimento não solicitado — Regulamentação nacional que exige que cada proprietário de um bem em regime de propriedade horizontal ligado a uma rede de aquecimento urbano contribua para as despesas relativas ao consumo de energia térmica das partes comuns e da instalação interior do edifício — Eficiência energética — Diretiva 2006/32/CE — Artigo 13.°, n.° 2 — Diretiva 2012/27 /UE — Ar...
 CONCLUSÕES DO ADVOGADO‐GERAL HENRIK SAUGMANDSGAARD ØE apresentadas em 30 de abril de 2019 1 Processos apensos C ‐ 708/17 e C ‐ 725/17 «EVN Bulgaria Toplofikatsia» EAD contra Nikolina Stefanova Dimitrova [pedido de decisão prejudicial apresentado pelo Rayonen sad Asenovgrad (Tribunal Regional de Asenovgrad, Bulgária)] e «Toplofikatsia Sofia» EAD contra Mitko Simeonov Dimitrov, com intervenção de: «Termokomplekt» OOD [pedido de decisão prejudicial apresentado pelo Sofiyski rayonen sad (Tribunal Regional de Sofia, Bulgária)] «Reenvio prejudicial — Aquecimento urbano — Edifícios em regime de propriedade horizontal abastecidos por uma rede de aquecimento — Proteção dos consumidores — Diretiva 2011/83 /UE — Artigo 27.o — Fornecimento não solicitado — Legislação nacional que prevê que os condóminos devem contribuir para as despesas de aquecimento, mesmo que não o utilizem nas suas frações — Eficácia energética ‐ Diretiva 2006/32/CE ‐ Artigo 13.o...


text:
 22.2.2016
 BG
 Официален вестник на Европейския съюз
 C 68/45
 Жалба, подадена на 27 ноември 2015 г. — ZZ/Парламент
 (Дело F-146/15)
 (2016/C 068/58)
 Език на производството: френски
 Страни
 Жалбоподател ZZ (представители: S. Orlandi и T. Martin, avocats)
 Ответник: Европейски парламент
 Предмет на производството
 Отмяна на решението на Парламента, с което се отхвърля молбата за преобразуване в точки за заслуги на докладите за годишна оценка на жалбоподателя, които са били утвърдени след повишаването му в степен AD 12
 Искания на жалбоподателя
 —
 Да се отмени решението на органа по назначаването от 8 април 2015 г., с което се отхвърля молбата за преобразуване на докладите за годишна оценка на жалбоподателя, утвърдени след повишаването му в степен AD 12, в точки за заслуги;
 —
 да се осъди Парламентът да заплати съдебните разноски.


type: wikipedia

text:
Klenovnik je općina u Hrvatskoj.
 Zemljopis
 Općina je smještena pretežito na južnim obroncima Ravne gore na sjeveru Hrvatskog zagorja, u blizini Ivanca (8 km), Lepoglave (14 km), Trakošćana (28 km) i Varaždina (25 km). Nalazi se na zapadu Varaždinske županije, a prostire se na 26 km2, odnosno zauzima 2,1% površine Varaždinske županije. Graniči s općinama Donja Voća, Ivanec, Maruševec i Lepoglava.
 Stanovništvo
 Po posljednjem popisu stanovništva iz 2001. godine, općina Klenovnik imala je 2.278 stanovnika, raspoređenih u 6 naselja:
 Dubravec - 470
 Goranec - 40
 Klenovnik - 1.051
 Lipovnik - 418
 Plemenšćina - 141
 Vukovoj - 158
 Uprava
 Na izborima 2013. za načelnika Klenovnika je izabran Martin Oreški.
 Povijest
 Gospodarstvo
 Poznate osobe
 Ivan Hojsak (1927.), hrvatski ekonomist i autor knjige "Rodoslovlje obitelji Drašković".
 Ivan Knežević - pjesnik, slikar i kolekcionar
 Spomenici i znamenitosti
 Dvorac Klenovnik
 Obrazovanje
 Kultura
 KUD Klenovnik
 Šport
 NK Klenovnik
 Karate klub Klenovnik
 Vanjske poveznice
 Službene stranice
 Općine u Varaždinskoj županiji


type: legislation

text:
 27.1.2006
 FR
 Journal officiel de l'Union européenne
 L 23/69
 DIRECTIVE 2006/4/CE DE LA COMMISSION
 du 26 janvier 2006
 modifiant les annexes des directives 86/362/CEE et 90/642/CEE du Conseil en ce qui concerne les teneurs maximales pour les résidus du carbofuran
 (Texte présentant de l'intérêt pour l'EEE)
 LA COMMISSION DES COMMUNAUTÉS EUROPÉENNES,
 vu le traité instituant la Communauté européenne,
 vu la directive 86/362/CEE du Conseil du 24 juillet 1986 concernant la fixation de teneurs maximales pour les résidus de pesticides sur et dans les céréales (1), et notamment son article 10,
 vu la directive 90/642/CEE du Conseil du 27 novembre 1990 concernant la fixation de teneurs maximales pour les résidus de pesticides sur ou dans certains produits d'origine végétale, y compris les fruits et légumes (2), et notamment son article 7,
 considérant ce qui suit:
 (1)
 Pour les céréales et les produits d'origine végétale, y compris les fruits et légumes, les teneurs en résidus reflètent l'utilisation des quantités minimales de pesticides nécessaires pour assurer une protection efficace des végétaux, appliquées de telle sorte que la quantité de résidus soit à la fois la plus réduite possible et toxicologiquement acceptable, notamment eu égard à la protection de l'environnement et à la protection des consommateurs, compte tenu de l'apport alimentaire estimé. Les teneurs maximales en résidus (TMR) communautaires représentent la limite supérieure des quantités de ces résidus susceptibles de se trouver dans des produits lorsque les producteurs ont respecté les bonnes pratiques agricoles.
 (2)
 Les TMR fixées pour les pesticides sont constamment réexaminées et sont modifiées de manière à prendre en considération les informations et les données nouvelles. Elles sont fixées au seuil de détection analytique lorsque les utilisations autorisées de produits phytopharmaceutiques ne donnent pas de teneurs en résidus de pesticides détectables sur ou dans les denrées alimentaires, lorsqu'il n'y a pas d'utilisation autorisée, lorsque les utilisations qui ont été autorisées par les États membres n'ont pas été étayées par les données nécessaires ou encore lorsque les utilisations dans les pays tiers entraînant la production de résidus sur ou dans les denrées alimentaires pouvant être mises en circulation sur le marché communautaire n'ont pas été étayées par les données nécessaires.
 (3)
 Plusieurs États membres ont fait savoir à la Commission qu'ils souhaitaient réviser des TMR nationales conformément à l'article 8 de la directive 90/642/CEE, eu égard à certaines préoccupations liées à l'exposition des consommateurs. Des propositions de révision de TMR communautaires ont été soumises à la Commission.
 (4)
 L'exposition des consommateurs durant leur vie entière ou pendant une courte durée aux pesticides visés à la présente directive par l'intermédiaire des produits alimentaires a été réexaminée et évaluée conformément aux procédures et aux pratiques communautaires en usage, compte tenu des orientations publiées par l'Organisation mondiale de la santé (3). Il convient, sur cette base, de fixer de nouvelles TMR qui excluront toute exposition inacceptable des consommateurs.
 (5)
 Lorsque cela se justifiait, l'exposition aiguë des consommateurs auxdits pesticides par l'intermédiaire de chacune des denrées alimentaires susceptibles de contenir des résidus a été mesurée et évaluée conformément aux procédures et aux pratiques communautaires en usage, compte tenu des orientations publiées par l'Organisation mondiale de la santé. Il en ressort que la présence de résidus de pesticides à des niveaux égaux ou inférieurs aux nouvelles TMR n'aura pas d'effets toxiques aigus.
 (6)
 Les partenaires commerciaux de la Communauté ont été consultés par le canal de l'Organisation mondiale du commerce sur les nouvelles TMR et il a été tenu compte de leurs observations sur ces teneurs.
 (7)
 Les annexes des directives 86/362/CEE et 90/642/CEE doivent dès lors être modifiées en conséquence.
 (8)
 Les mesures prévues à la présente directive sont conformes à l'avis du comité permanent de la chaîne alimentaire et de la santé animale,
 A ARRÊTÉ LA PRÉSENTE DIRECTIVE:
 Article premier
 La partie A de l'annexe II de la directive 86/362/CEE est modifiée conformément à l'annexe I de la présente directive.
 Article 2
 La partie A de l'annexe II de la directive 90/642/CEE est modifiée conformément à l'annexe II de la présente directive.
 Article 3
 Les États membres adoptent et publient les dispositions législatives, réglementaires et administratives nécessaires pour se conformer à la présente directive au plus tard le 27 juillet 2006. Ils communiquent immédiatement à la Commission le texte de ces dispositions ainsi qu'un tableau de correspondance entre ces dispositions et la présente directive.
 Ils appliquent ces dispositions à partir du 27 juillet 2006.
 Lorsque les États membres adoptent ces dispositions, elles contiennent une référence à la présente directive ou sont accompagnées d'une telle référence lors de leur publication officielle. Les modalités de cette référence sont arrêtées par les États membres.
 Les États membres communiquent à la Commission le texte des dispositions essentielles de droit interne qu'ils adoptent dans le domaine régi par la présente directive.
 Article 4
 La présente directive entre en vigueur le vingtième jour suivant celui de sa publication au Journal officiel de l'Union européenne.
 Article 5
 Les États membres sont destinataires de la présente directive.
 Fait à Bruxelles, le 26 janvier 2006.
 Par la Commission
 Markos KYPRIANOU
 Membre de la Commission
 (1) JO L 221 du 7.8.1986, p. 37. Directive modifiée en dernier lieu par la directive 2005/76/CE de la Commission (JO L 293 du 9.11.2005, p. 14).
 (2) JO L 350 du 14.12.1990, p. 71. Directive modifiée en dernier lieu par la directive 2005/76/CE.
 (3) Guide pour le calcul prévisionnel des quantités de résidus de pesticides appliqué pour l’alimentation (révisé), préparé par le système mondial de surveillance continue de l’environnement/programme alimentaire (GEMS/Food programme), en collaboration avec le comité du Codex sur les résidus de pesticides et publié par l’Organisation mondiale de la santé, 1997 (OMS/FSF/FOS/97.7).
 ANNEXE I
 À l'annexe II, partie A, de la directive 86/362/CEE, la ligne relative au carbofuran est remplacée par le texte suivant:
 «Résidus de pesticides
 Teneur maximale en mg/kg
 Carbofuran (somme du carbofuran et du 3-hydroxy-carbofuran exprimée en carbofuran)
 0,02 (1): céréales
 (1) Indique le seuil de détection.»
 ANNEXE II
 À l'annexe II, partie A, de la directive 90/642/CEE, les lignes relatives au carbofuran sont remplacées par le texte suivant:
 Résidus de pesticides et teneurs maximales en résidus (mg/kg)
 Groupes et exemples de produits individuels auxquels s'appliquent les teneurs maximales en résidus
 Carbofuran (somme du carbofuran et du 3-hydroxy-carbofuran exprimée en carbofuran)
 «1. Fruits frais, séchés ou non cuits, conservés par congélation, sans addition de sucre; noix
 i)
 AGRUMES
 0,3
 Pamplemousses
 Citrons
 Limettes
 Mandarines (y compris les clémentines et les hybrides similaires)
 Oranges
 Pomélos
 Autres
 ii)
 NOIX (écalées ou non)
 0,02 (1)
 Amandes
 Noix du Brésil
 Noix de cajou
 Châtaignes
 Noix de coco
 Noisettes
 Noix de Queensland
 Noix pécan
 Pignons
 Pistaches
 Noix communes
 Autres
 iii)
 FRUITS À PÉPINS
 0,02 (1)
 Pommes
 Poires
 Coings
 Autres
 iv)
 FRUITS À NOYAU
 0,02 (1)
 Abricots
 Cerises
 Pêches (y compris les nectarines et les hybrides similaires)
 Prunes
 Autres
 v)
 BAIES ET PETITS FRUITS
 0,02 (1)
 a)
 Raisins de table et raisins de cuve
 Raisins de table
 Raisins de cuve
 b)
 Fraises (autres que les fraises des bois)
 c)
 Fruits de ronces (autres que sauvages)
 Mûres
 Mûres de haies
 Ronces-framboises
 Framboises
 Autres
 d)
 Autres petits fruits et baies (autres que sauvages)
 Myrtilles
 Airelles
 Groseilles (à grappes rouges, blanches ou noires)
 Groseilles à maquereau
 Autres
 e)
 Baies et fruits sauvages
 vi)
 FRUITS DIVERS
 0,02 (1)
 Avocats
 Bananes
 Dattes
 Figues
 Kiwis
 Kumquats
 Litchis
 Mangues
 a)
 Olives
 Olives (de table)
 Olives (extraction d'huile)
 Fruits de la passion
 Ananas
 Papayes
 Autres
 2.
 Légumes frais ou non cuits, à l'état congelé ou séché
 0,02 (1)
 i)
 LÉGUMES-RACINES ET LÉGUMES-TUBERCULES
 Betteraves
 Carottes
 Céleris-raves
 Raifort
 Topinambours
 Panais
 Persil à grosse racine
 Radis
 Salsifis
 Patates douces
 Rutabagas
 Navets
 Ignames
 Autres
 ii)
 LÉGUMES-BULBES
 Ail
 Oignons
 Échalotes
 Oignons de printemps
 Autres
 iii)
 LÉGUMES-FRUITS
 a)
 Solanacées
 Tomates
 Poivrons
 Aubergines
 Autres
 b)
 Cucurbitacées à peau comestible
 Concombres
 Cornichons
 Courgettes
 Autres
 c)
 Cucurbitacées à écorce non comestible
 Melons
 Courges
 Pastèques
 Autres
 d)
 Maïs doux
 iv)
 BRASSICÉES
 a)
 Choux (développement de l'inflorescence)
 Brocolis
 Choux-fleurs
 Autres
 b)
 Choux pommés
 Choux de Bruxelles
 Choux pommés
 Autres
 c)
 Choux (développement des feuilles)
 Choux de Chine
 Choux non pommés
 Autres
 d)
 Choux-raves
 v)
 LÉGUMES-FEUILLES ET FINES HERBES
 a)
 Laitues et similaires
 Cresson
 Mâche
 Laitue
 Scarole
 Autres
 b)
 Épinards et similaires
 Épinards
 Feuilles de bettes (cardes)
 Autres
 c)
 Cresson d'eau
 d)
 Endives/chicons
 e)
 Fines herbes
 Cerfeuil
 Ciboulette
 Persil
 Céleri à couper
 Autres
 vi)
 LÉGUMINEUSES POTAGÈRES (fraîches)
 Haricots (non écossés)
 Haricots (écossés)
 Pois (non écossés)
 Pois (écossés)
 Autres
 vii)
 LÉGUMES-TIGES (frais)
 Asperges
 Cardons
 Céleri
 Fenouil
 Artichauts
 Poireaux
 Rhubarbe
 Autres
 viii)
 CHAMPIGNONS
 a)
 Champignons de couche
 b)
 Champignons sauvages
 3.
 Légumineuses séchées
 0,02 (1)
 Haricots
 Lentilles
 Pois
 Autres
 4.
 Graines oléagineuses
 0,1
 Graines de lin
 Arachides
 Graines de pavot
 Graines de sésame
 Graines de tournesol
 Graines de colza
 Fèves de soja
 Graines de moutarde
 Graines de coton
 Autres
 5.
 Pommes de terre
 0,02 (1)
 Pommes de terre primeurs
 Pommes de terre de conservation
 6.
 Thé (feuilles et tiges, séchées, fermentées ou non, de Camellia sinensis)
 0,05 (1)
 7.
 Houblon (séché), y compris les granulés de houblon et la poudre non concentrée
 0,05 (1)
 (1) Indique la limite de détermination analytique.»


text:
L 87/92 CS Úřední věstník Evropské unie 28.3.2019
 PŘEKLAD
 Společný dopis Evropských společenství a jejich členských států na straně jedné a Japonska na straně druhé
 podle odstavce 5 Postupů k uplatňování článku XXI Všeobecné dohody o obchodu službami (GATS) (S/L/80
 z 29. října 1999)
 vztahující se ke
 změnám navrhovaným v listině závazků dohody GATS Evropských společenství a jejich členských států (dále
 ES) k zohlednění přistoupení České republiky, Estonské republiky, Finské republiky, Kyperské republiky,
 Litevské republiky, Lotyšské republiky, Maďarské republiky, Maltské republiky, Polské republiky, Rakouské
 republiky, Slovenské republiky, Slovinské republiky a Švédského království k Evropským společenstvím
 Ve dnech 28. května 2004 a 4. dubna 2005 předložila ES dvě Sdělení podle článku V:5 GATS (v oběhu jako dokument
 S/SECRET/8 z 11. června 2004 a jako dokument S/SECRET/9 z 12. dubna 2005), čímž oznámila svůj záměr změnit či
 stáhnout specifické závazky obsažené v seznamu připojeném ke Sdělení podle článku V:5 GATS a v souladu se zněním
 článku XXI:1(b) GATS.
 Po předložení každého sdělení předložilo Japonsko dva požadavky na kompenzaci podle článku XXI:2(a) GATS (S/L/
 168 s ohledem na S/SECRET/8 a S/L/218 s ohledem na S/SECRET/9). ES a Japonsko zahájily jednání podle článku XXI:2(a)
 GATS s ohledem na S/SECRET/8 a S/SECRET/9.
 S ohledem na postup zahájený oznámením obsaženým v dokumentu S/SECRET/8 byla původní lhůta pro jednání, která
 vypršela 26. října 2004, prodloužena (po společné dohodě) pětkrát (do 26. dubna 2005, do 27. února 2006, do 1. června
 2006, do 1. července a do 17. července 2006). Během těchto jednání se ES a Japonsko dohodly na kompenzačních
 vyrovnáních spojených se staženími a změnami obsaženými v dokumentu S/SECRET/8.
 S ohledem na postup zahájený oznámením obsaženým v dokumentu S/SECRET/9 nebylo mezi ES a Japonskem do
 ukončení lhůty pro jednání dosaženo dohody a žádný dotčený člen nepředal v příslušné lhůtě záležitost k rozhodčímu
 řízení podle odstavce 7 S/L/80. Podle článku XXI:3(b) GATS a s výhradou ukončení postupů stanovených v odstavcích 20-
 22 S/L/ 80 mohou ES uplatňovat změny a stažení navržené v dokumentu S/SECRET/9.
 Zpráva o výsledku těchto jednání, která je připojena k tomuto dopisu, obsahuje (1) navržené změny v oznámeních
 uvedených výše, (2) dohodnutá kompenzační vyrovnání s ohledem na změny či stažení oznámené v S/SECRET/8 a (3)
 návrh konsolidované listiny specifických závazků vyplývající ze sloučení stávajících listin závazků ES a jejich členských
 států a z jejich zahrnutí do změn či stažení závazků oznámených ES v dokumentech S/SECRET/8 a S/SECRET/9 a kom
 penzačních vyrovnáních dohodnutých ES a Japonskem.
 Tento dopis a přílohy I a II zprávy k němu přiložené tvoří Dohodu mezi ES a Japonskem s ohledem na S/SECRET/8 pro
 účely článku XXI:2(a) GATS (1). Dohoda nesmí být vykládána způsobem, který by měnil seznamy v článku II Vynětí ES
 a jejich členských států. Dohoda nesmí být vykládána tak, aby postihovala práva a povinnosti stran podle článku VIII:8
 GATS.
 Podle postupů, na které odkazují odstavce 20 až 22 S/L/80, předají ES sekretariátu k distribuci návrh společného plánu
 k ověření do 14. září 2006 za předpokladu, že bude podepsána dohoda se všemi dotčenými členy či pokud vypršela lhůta
 uvedená v odstavci 7 S/L/80 a nebyla podána žádná žádost o smírčí řízení. Výsledky jednání vstoupí v platnost po
 ukončení ověřovacích postupů v den, který bude stanoven ES po ukončení vnitřních schvalovacích postupů ES, který
 se budou ES snažit co nejvíce uspíšit. Změny a stažení navržené v dokumentech S/SECRET/8 a S/SECRET/9 nevstoupí
 v platnost, dokud nevstoupí v platnost všechna kompenzační vyrovnání uvedená v příloze II.
 (1) Tega sporazuma se ne sme razlagati, kot da posega v izid ločenih pogovorov v okviru STO v zvezi s klasifikacijo telekomunikacijskih
 storitev (osnovne telekomunikacije in storitve z dodano vrednostjo).
 ---pagebreak--- 28.3.2019 CS Úřední věstník Evropské unie L 87/93
 Zpráva o výsledku jednání vedených v souladu s článkem XXI:2(a) Všeobecné dohody o obchodu službami
 (GATS)
 vztahující se ke
 změnám navrhovaným v listině závazků dohody Evropských společenství a jejich členských států (dále ES)
 k zohlednění přistoupení České republiky, Estonské republiky, Finské republiky, Kyperské republiky, Litevské
 republiky, Lotyšské republiky, Maďarské republiky, Maltské republiky, Polské republiky, Rakouské republiky,
 Slovenské republiky, Slovinské republiky a Švédského království k Evropským společenstvím
 Podle odstavce 5 Postupů k uplatňování článku XXI:11 GATS (S/L/80 z 29. října 1999) předkládají ES tuto zprávu:
 1. Dne 28. května 2004 a 4. dubna 2005 předložila ES dvě příslušná sdělení podle článku V:5 GATS (v oběhu jako
 dokument S/SECRET/8 z 11. června 2004 a jako dokument S/SECRET/9 z 12. dubna 2005), čímž oznámila svůj záměr
 změnit či stáhnout specifické závazky obsažené v seznamu připojeném ke sdělením (dále „navrhované změny“) podle
 článku V:5 GATS a v souladu s podmínkami článku XXI:1(b) GATS. Navrhované změny jsou obsaženy v příloze I.
 2. Po předložení oznámení obsaženého v dokumentu S/SECRET/8 a podle článku XXI:2(a) GATS předložilo osmnáct
 členů WTO (Argentina, Austrálie, Brazílie, Čína, čínská Tchaj-pej, Ekvádor, Filipíny, Hongkong (Čína), Indie, Japonsko,
 Kanada, Kolumbie, Korejská republika, Kuba, Nový Zéland, Spojené státy americké, Švýcarsko a Uruguay) své žádosti
 o kompenzační vyrovnání.
 3. Po předložení oznámení obsaženého v dokumentu S/SECRET/9 a podle článku XXI:2(a) GATS předložilo čtrnáct členů
 WTO (Argentina, Austrálie, Brazílie, Čína, Ekvádor, Hongkong (Čína), Indie, Japonsko, Kanada, Kolumbie, Korejská
 republika, Nový Zéland, Spojené státy americké a Uruguay) své požadavky na kompenzaci.
 4. Japonsko předložilo dva požadavky na kompenzaci podle článku XXI:2(a) GATS (S/L/163 s ohledem na S/SECRET/8
 a S/L/221 s ohledem na S/SECRET/9). ES a Japonsko zahájily jednání podle článku XXI:2(a) GATS s ohledem na
 S/SECRET/8 a S/SECRET/9.
 5. S ohledem na postup zahájený oznámením obsaženým v dokumentu S/SECRET/8 byla původní lhůta pro jednání,
 která vypršela 26. října 2004, prodloužena (po společné dohodě) pětkrát (do 26. dubna 2005, do 27. února 2006, do
 1. června 2006, do 1. července a do 17. července 2006).
 6. Během těchto jednání se ES a Japonsko dohodly na kompenzačních vyrovnáních spojených se změnami a staženími
 obsaženými v dokumentu S/SECRET/8. Přílohy I a II této zprávy, společně se společným dopisem, ke kterému jsou
 přiloženy, tvoří Dohodu mezi ES a Japonskem s ohledem na S/SECRET/8 pro účely článku XXI:2(a) GATS (2). Tato
 dohoda nesmí být vykládána způsobem, který by měnil seznamy v článku II Vynětí ES a jejich členských států. Tato
 dohoda nesmí být vykládána tak, aby postihovala práva a povinnosti stran podle článku VIII:8 GATS.
 7. S ohledem na postup zahájený oznámením obsaženým v dokumentu S/SECRET/9 nebylo mezi ES a Japonskem do
 ukončení lhůty pro jednání dosaženo dohody a žádný dotčený člen nepředal v příslušné lhůtě záležitost k rozhodčímu
 řízení podle odstavce 7 S/L/80. Podle článku XXI:3(b) GATS a s výhradou ukončení postupů stanovených v odstavcích
 20-22 S/L/ 80 mohou ES uplatňovat změny a stažení navržené v dokumentu S/SECRET/9.
 (2) Tega sporazuma se ne sme razlagati, kot da posega v izid ločenih pogovorov v okviru STO v zvezi s klasifikacijo telekomunikacijskih
 storitev (osnovne telekomunikacije in storitve z dodano vrednostjo).
 ---pagebreak--- L 87/94 CS Úřední věstník Evropské unie 28.3.2019
 8. S ohledem na výše uvedené jsou navržené změny a dohodnutá kompenzační vyrovnání začleněna do návrhu konso
 lidované listiny závazků GATS ES, která je výsledkem sloučení stávajících listin závazků ES a jejich členských států
 a zahrnutí jak změn, tak stažení závazků oznámených ES v dokumentech S/SECRET/8 a S/SECRET/9 a kompenzačních
 vyrovnání dohodnutých ES a Japonskem.
 9. Podle postupů, na které odkazují odstavce 20 až 22 S/L/80, předají ES sekretariátu k distribuci návrh společného plánu
 k ověření do 14. září 2006 za předpokladu, že bude podepsána dohoda se všemi dotčenými členy či pokud vypršela
 lhůta uvedená v odstavci 7 S/L/80 a nebyla podána žádná žádost o smírčí řízení. Výsledky jednání vstoupí v platnost
 po ukončení ověřovacích postupů v den, který bude stanoven ES po ukončení vnitřních schvalovacích postupů ES,
 který se budou ES snažit co nejvíce uspíšit. Změny a stažení navržené v dokumentech S/SECRET/8 a S/SECRET/9
 nevstoupí v platnost, dokud nevstoupí v platnost všechna kompenzační vyrovnání uvedená v příloze II.
 ---pagebreak--- 28.3.2019 CS Úřední věstník Evropské unie L 87/95
 PŘÍLOHA I
 A) Změny oznámené v dokumentu S/SECRET/8:
 Horizontální závazky
 • Poznámka o přístupu na trh (strana 9): „Služby považované ve všech členských státech ES za veřejné na vnitrostátní či
 místní úrovni mohou být veřejným monopolem či oblastí výhradních práv udělených soukromým subjektům.“ Tato
 poznámka nebyla uvedena v listině specifických závazků České republiky, Estonska, Finska, Kypru, Litvy, Lotyšska,
 Maďarska, Malty, Polska, Rakouska, Slovenska, Slovinska a Švédska. Toto omezení se nyní vztahuje na všechny členské
 státy.
 • Omezení národního zacházení na odvětví, agentury a zastupitelské úřady ve způsobu poskytování 3 (strany 9 a 10).
 Tato poznámka nebyla uvedena v listině specifických závazků České republiky, Estonska, Kypru, Litvy, Lotyšska, Malty,
 Slovenska a Slovinska. Toto omezení se nyní vztahuje na všechny členské státy.
 • Omezení národního zacházení na dceřiné společnosti ve způsobu poskytování 3 (strana 10). Tato poznámka nebyla
 uvedena v listině specifických závazků České republiky, Estonska, Kypru, Litvy, Lotyšska, Maďarska, Malty, Polska,
 Slovenska a Slovinska. Toto omezení se nyní vztahuje na všechny členské státy.
 • Omezení národního zacházení na dotace ve způsobu zacházení 3 (strana 13). Listiny specifických závazků České
 republiky, Estonska, Finska, Kypru, Litvy, Lotyšska, Malty, Rakouska, Slovenska, Slovinska a Švédska obsahovaly
 pouze část omezení na dotace ve způsobu zacházení 3 zapsaných v listině závazků ES a jejich členských států. Tato
 omezení jsou nyní rozšířena na tyto členské státy.
 • Omezení národního zacházení na dotace ve způsobu poskytování 4 (strana 13). Listiny specifických závazků České
 republiky, Estonska, Kypru, Lotyšska, Maďarska, Malty a Slovenska neobsahovaly omezení na dotace ve způsob posky
 tování 4 zapsaná v listině závazků ES a jeho členských států. Tato omezení jsou nyní rozšířena na tyto členské státy.
 • Závazky Kypru ohledně přístupu na trh ve způsobu poskytování 4. Tyto závazky jsou nyní staženy.
 • Poznámka o přístupu na trh ve způsobu poskytování 4 – převody mezi společnostmi (strana 26). Listiny specifických
 závazků České republiky, Litvy, Lotyšska, Maďarska, Polska a Slovenska neobsahovaly omezení, že přijímající entita
 musí skutečně poskytovat podobné služby na území dotčených členských států Společenství. Toto omezení je nyní
 rozšířeno na tyto členské státy.
 • Poznámka o přístupu na trh ve způsobu poskytování 4 – obchodní návštěvy – prodejci služeb (strana 30). Listina
 specifických závazků Polska neobsahovala omezení, že se tito zástupci nebudou zabývat přímým prodejem veřejnosti,
 ani poskytováním služeb. Toto omezení je nyní rozšířeno na tento členský stát.
 • Poznámka o přístupu na trh ve způsobu poskytování 4 – obchodní návštěvy – ustavení obchodní přítomnosti
 (strana 30). Listina specifických závazků Litvy neobsahovala omezení, že se tito zástupci nebudou zabývat přímým
 prodejem veřejnosti, ani poskytováním služeb. Toto omezení je nyní rozšířeno na tento členský stát.
 • Závazky Litvy ohledně přístupu na trh ve způsobu poskytování 4 – obchodní návštěvy (strana 32). Tyto závazky jsou
 nyní částečně staženy.
 • Závazky Lotyšska ohledně přístupu na trh ve způsobu poskytování 4 – poskytovatelé smluvních služeb (strana 33).
 Listina specifických závazků Lotyšska neobsahovala omezení, že dočasný vstup do dotčeného členského státu a pobyt
 v něm nesmí být delší než tři měsíce v jakémkoliv dvanáctiměsíčním období. Toto omezení je nyní rozšířeno na tento
 členský stát.
 Sektorové závazky
 • Služby nájmů/pronájmů bez operátorů – pro letadla (strana 95). Omezení vstupu na trh ve způsobu poskytování 2 se
 rozšiřuje na Estonsko, Finsko, Litvu, Maďarsko, Rakousko, Slovinsko a Švédsko a omezení vstupu na trh ve způsobu
 poskytování 3 se rozšiřuje na Estonsko, Maďarsko a Rakousko.
 ---pagebreak--- L 87/96 CS Úřední věstník Evropské unie 28.3.2019
 • Služby související s výrobou (strany 109 a 110). Závazky obsažené v listinách specifických závazků Litvy, Lotyšska
 a Rakouska jsou staženy.
 • Vzdělávací služby (strana 156): omezení na „služby financované výhradně ze soukromých zdrojů“. Toto omezení
 nebylo zahrnuto do listin Estonska, Kypru, Litvy, Lotyšska, Maďarska, Rakouska, Slovenska a Slovinska (nezahrnuto
 pouze pro vzdělávací služby dospělým). Toto omezení je nyní rozšířeno na tyto členské státy. V případě Slovinska se
 toto rozšíření týká pouze vzdělávacích služeb dospělým.
 • Bankovní a jiné finanční služby (mimo pojišťovnictví) (strany 193, 213 a 217). Omezení přístupu na trh uvádějící, že
 „zřízení specializované manažerské společnosti je nutné k provádění činností spojených s řízením podílových fondů
 a investičních společností“ a že „pouze firmy mající místo podnikaní ve Společenství mohou působit jako depozitáři
 aktiv investičních fondů,“ oboje ve způsobu poskytování 1 a 3, nebyla uvedena v listině závazků České republiky pokud
 jde o způsob poskytování 3, Estonska (nezahrnuto ani ve způsobu poskytování 1, ani ve způsobu poskytování 3), Litvy
 pokud jde o způsob poskytování 1, Lotyšska pokud jde o způsob poskytování 3, Maďarska pokud jde o způsob
 poskytování 3 a Slovenska pokud jde o způsob poskytování 3. Tato omezení jsou nyní rozšířena na tyto členské státy.
 • Vesmírná doprava. Závazek zahrnutý do listiny specifických závazků Rakouska se stahuje.
 • Letecká doprava – pronájem letadel s posádkou (strana 246). Dvě omezení přístupu na trh (jedno ve způsobu posky
 tování 1 a 2 a druhé ve způsobu poskytování 3) jsou zavedeny pro Polsko.
 • Letecká doprava – prodej a uvádění na trh (strany 247 a 248). Listina specifických závazků Estonska neobsahovala
 omezení národního zacházení pro distribuci prostřednictvím počítačového rezervačního systému (CRS) služeb letecké
 dopravy poskytovaných mateřským dopravcem CRS.
 • Letecká přeprava – počítačový rezervační systém (strana 248). Listina specifických závazků Maďarska neobsahovala
 omezení národního zacházení pro závazky mateřských nebo zúčastněných dopravců v souvislosti s CRS, který je řízen
 leteckým dopravcem z jedné nebo více třetích zemí.
 • Pomocné služby pro všechny druhy dopravy – manipulace s nákladem (strana 259). Omezení přístupu na trh ve
 způsobu poskytování 3 bylo zavedeno pro Estonsko, Litvu a Lotyšsko.
 B) Změny oznámené v dokumentu S/SECRET/9:
 Horizontální závazky
 • Závazky Kypru a Malty ve způsobu poskytování 4 podle národního zacházení (strany 25, 29 a 32 S/SECRET/8). Tyto
 závazky jsou staženy.
 Sektorové závazky
 • Počítačové a související služby – a) konzultační služby související s instalací počítačového technického vybavení (CPC
 841) (strana 82) – b) služby implementace softwaru (CPC 842) (strana 83) – c) služby zpracování dat (CPC 843)
 (strana 85) – d) databázové služby (CPC 844) (strana 86). Závazky Kypru ve způsobu poskytování 4 (osoby převedené
 v rámci společnosti, návštěvníci za účelem obchodu a smluvní poskytovatelé služeb jsou staženy.
 • Služby ve vědě a výzkumu – b) služby vědy a výzkumu v sociálních a humanitních vědách (CPC 852) (strany 89 a 90).
 Závazky Kypru ve způsobu poskytování 4 (osoby převedené v rámci společnosti, návštěvníci za účelem obchodu
 a smluvní poskytovatelé služeb) jsou v národním zacházení staženy.
 • Pojišťovací služby a služby vztahující se k pojištění – (i) přímé pojištění (včetně společného pojištění): (a) životní a (b)
 neživotní (strany 211 a 212). Závazky Kypru ve způsobu poskytování 4 (osoby převedené v rámci společnosti,
 návštěvníci za účelem obchodu a smluvní poskytovatelé služeb) jsou z národního zacházení staženy.
 ---pagebreak--- 28.3.2019 CS Úřední věstník Evropské unie L 87/97
 • Bankovnictví a jiné finanční služby (s výjimkou pojišťovnictví) – (x) (e) převoditelné cenné papíry (strana 223). Závazky
 Kypru ve způsobu poskytování 4 (osoby převedené v rámci společnosti, návštěvníci za účelem obchodu a smluvní
 poskytovatelé služeb) jsou z národního zacházení staženy.
 • Hotely, restaurace a zásobování (CPC 641, 642 a 643) (strana 232): Závazky Malty ve způsobu poskytování 4 (osoby
 převedené v rámci společnosti, návštěvníci za účelem obchodu a smluvní poskytovatelé služeb) jsou z národního
 zacházení staženy.
 • Služby cestovních agentur a cestovních operátorů (CPC 7471) (strany 233 a 234). Závazky Malty ve způsobu posky
 tování 4 (osoby převedené v rámci společnosti, návštěvníci za účelem obchodu a smluvní poskytovatelé služeb) jsou
 z národního zacházení staženy.
 • Služby námořní dopravy – kromě kabotáže - (a) osobní doprava (CPC 7211); (b) nákladní doprava (CPC 7212)
 (strana 242). Závazky Malty ve způsobu poskytování 4 (osoby převedené v rámci společnosti, návštěvníci za účelem
 obchodu a smluvní poskytovatelé služeb) jsou z národního zacházení staženy
 ---pagebreak--- L 87/98 CS Úřední věstník Evropské unie 28.3.2019
 PŘÍLOHA II
 KOMPENZACE ES
 • způsob poskytování 3 horizontální omezení veřejných služeb
 — Poznámka pod čarou na obálce upozorňující, že toto omezení se netýká telekomunikačních a počítačových služeb
 a služeb s nimi spojených.
 • způsob poskytování 3 horizontální omezení investic
 — Odstranění omezení národního zacházení pro AT ve způsobu poskytování 3 týkající se poboček cizích akciových
 společností (Aktiengesellschaftem) a společností s ručením omezeným (Gesellschaftem mit beschränkter Haftung).
 • způsob poskytování 4 pro osoby převedené v rámci společnosti a návštěvníky za účelem obchodu
 — Závazky CY a MT ohledně přístupu na trh a národního zacházení v horizontální sekci a ve specifické sektorové
 sekci v sektorech, kde CY a MT přijaly závazky pro způsob poskytování 3.
 • Odborné služby – inženýrské služby (CPC 8672)
 — Závazky CY a MT ohledně přístupu na trh a národního zacházení pro způsob poskytování 2
 — Závazky CY, CZ, MT a SK ohledně přístupu na trh pro způsob poskytování 3
 — Závazky CY a MT ohledně národního zacházení pro způsob poskytování 3
 — Odstranění omezení národního zacházení pro PT pro způsob zacházení 3
 • Odborné služby – integrované inženýrské služby (CPC 8673)
 — Odstranění testu ekonomické potřebnosti aplikovaného UK na způsob zacházení 4/smluvní poskytovatelé služeb
 — Závazky SK ohledně přístupu na trh a národního zacházení pro způsob poskytování 3.
 • Odborné služby – urbanistika a krajinné architektonické služby (CPC 8674)
 — Závazky CY, CZ, MT, PL, SI a SK ohledně přístupu na trh a národního zacházení pro způsob poskytování 3.
 — Závazky HU ohledně přístupu na trh a národního zacházení týkající se krajinných architektonických služeb pro
 způsob poskytování 2.
 • Počítačové a související služby
 — Přidání vysvětlující poznámky pod čarou.
 — Závazky HU ohledně přístupu na trh a národního zacházení pro způsob poskytování 1, 2 a 3 pro smluvní
 poskytovatele služeb 845 a 849.
 — Lepší podmínky pro způsob poskytování 4 smluvní poskytovatelé služeb pro počítačové a související služby
 v horizontální sekci v SE a nové závazky SE ohledně způsobu poskytování 4 smluvní poskytovatelé služeb pro
 CPC 845 a 849.
 • Reklamní služby (CPC 871):
 — Závazky CY, MT a PL ohledně přístupu na trh a národního zacházení pro způsob poskytování 1.
 • Telekomunikační služby
 — Nové vylepšené závazky celých ES v revidované nabídce Rozvojového kola z Dohá (DDA).
 — Vysvětlení FI, že se jeho tři horizontální omezení ve způsobu poskytování 3, týkající se přístupu na trh právnických
 osob, přidružených společností, poboček, agentur azastupitelských úřadů v národním režimu a investic v přístupu
 na trh, nevztahují na telekomunikační služby.
 ---pagebreak--- 28.3.2019 CS Úřední věstník Evropské unie L 87/99
 — Vysvětlující poznámka pod čarou uvádějící, že jsou zde zahrnuty podsektory 2.C.h) až 2.C.m) na sektorovém
 klasifikačním seznamu služeb obsažené v MTN, GNS/W/120 (služby s přidanou hodnotou) a podsektorech 2.C.a)
 až 2.C.g) téhož seznamu. Podsektor 2.C.o) téhož seznamu je zde rovněž zahrnut v rozsahu odpovídajícím této
 definici. Pro účely tohoto plánu je podsektor 2C.n téhož seznamu (informace on-line a/nebo zpracování dat)
 zahrnut do tohoto plánu závazků v části 1.B (počítačové a související služby).
 • Finanční služby (pojišťovnictví)
 — Odstranění části omezení přístupu na trh pro SK pro způsob poskytování 3.
 • Finanční služby (bankovnictví)
 — FI: změna ve způsobu poskytování 3 požadavky trvalého pobytu („Alespoň jeden ze zakladatelů, členů představen
 stva, dozorčí rady a generální ředitel musí mít trvalý pobyt v Evropském společenství...“ místo „Alespoň polovina
 zakladatelů, členů představenstva, dozorčí rady a delegátů, generální ředitel, prokurista a osoba pověřená podepi
 sovat jménem úvěrové instituce musí mít trvalý pobyt v Evropském společenství...“.
 • Hotely, restaurace a zásobování
 — Nové (méně restriktivní) znění pro test ekonomické potřebnosti aplikovaný IT v rámci způsobu poskytování 3
 ohledně barů, kaváren a restaurací, včetně závazku o jeho nediskriminační povaze.
 • Služby cestovních kanceláří a cestovních operátorů
 — Odstranění testu ekonomické potřebnosti aplikovaného CZ pro způsob poskytování 3
 • Kadeřnické služby
 — Závazky CZ, FI, HU a SK ohledně přístupu na trh a národního zacházení pro způsob poskytování 2 a 3.
 K označení členských států se používají následující zkratky:
 AT Rakousko
 BE Belgie
 CY Kypr
 CZ Česká republika
 DE Německo
 DK Dánsko
 EE Estonsko
 EL Řecko
 ES Španělsko
 FI Finsko
 FR Francie
 HU Maďarsko
 IE Irsko
 IT Itálie
 LT Litva
 ---pagebreak--- L 87/100 CS Úřední věstník Evropské unie 28.3.2019
 LU Lucembursko
 LV Lotyšsko
 MT Malta
 NL Nizozemsko
 PL Polsko
 PT Portugalsko
 SE Švédsko
 SI Slovinsko
 SK Slovenská republika
 UK Spojené království