text:
 300 Md. 343 (1984)
 478 A.2d 315
 ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY, MARYLAND
 v.
 THOMAS BURNOPP ET AL.
 No. 142, September Term, 1983.
 Court of Appeals of Maryland.
 July 16, 1984.
 Victor A. Sulin, Deputy County Sol., Annapolis, for appellant.
 Allan C. Westcott, Annapolis, for appellees.
 Argued before SMITH, ELDRIDGE, COLE, DAVIDSON, RODOWSKY and COUCH, JJ., and CHARLES E. ORTH, Jr., Associate Judge of the Court of Appeals (retired), Specially Assigned.
 SMITH, Judge.
 We shall here reverse an order of the Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County which dismissed a petition of Anne Arundel County to condemn land for a road, apparently on the grounds both of a failure to prove public necessity as well as public use.
 I
 Anne Arundel County is a charter county under Md. Const. art. XI-A. Maryland Code (1957, 1981 Repl.Vol.) Art. 25A, § 5(B) authorizes it to condemn property "required for public purposes in the county...." Anne Arundel County Code (1982) § 1-317 authorizes condemnation of real property "necessary for a public purpose."
 Sleepy Hollow Road runs easterly from Gambrills Road in Anne Arundel County. The County sought to condemn a strip 40 feet wide and about 500 feet long through the lands of appellees, Thomas Burnopp et al. (the landowners). This would connect with another portion of Sleepy Hollow Road extending another 2,000 feet to a dead end. Legislation authorizing the acquisition had been duly passed. The budget proposals in connection with the project recited that it was necessary for the County to take over the road to make the necessary improvements so that emergency services, garbage collection, snow removal, and postal service could be provided to the residences on the remainder of Sleepy Hollow Road. The landowners in their respective answers denied that it was "necessary or proper to acquire the described property for any proper public project" and denied "that the purpose of these proceedings ... is a bona fide public purpose...."
 Pursuant to the provisions of Maryland Rule 502 a the landowners requested the trial court to hold "a separate trial on the issue of public necessity for the use contemplated by the ... proposed condemnation...." At that trial the County introduced evidence of the adoption of the appropriate resolutions for condemnation. The evidence is summarized in the oral opinion of the trial judge:
 "The evidence is that Sleepy Hollow Road was a private twenty foot right of way which has existed for a number of years, at least back into the '40's. It now services twenty to  twenty to twenty-four homes. The subject property, that is the subject property which is the subject of these proceedings, borders the north and south side of the road for five hundred feet in an easterly direction from Gambrills Road. That five hundred feet, over the years, has been reasonably well maintained by the adjoining neighbors, they're the defendants in this case. The road proceeds east for about one mile. The balance of this is a right of way. The Court does not know who the owners are, but I suppose I can infer and do find that the owners of that  the balance of the right of way are adjoining land owners on up the road. This part of the road, that is the road that is beyond the five hundred foot point, is poorly maintained and is subject to potholes. There are no County services provided, except for emergency fire and ambulance. There is a school bus provided for the very next adjoining neighbor to the east of the subject property. The Postal Union apparently has had enough influence to cause pressure to have that service discontinued by virtue of the fact of the condition of the road was not satisfactory to the Union or the delivery man for the purpose of the delivery of the mail. The Court has seen the photographs and sees pot  sees potholes and it is obvious the road is in a state of disrepair, but it's not unpassable. So, the residents, not all the residents, nor does the Court know whether it's a majority. The Court just does not know the number, has asked the County to acquire the property that is acquire the road and maintain the road. At one time, the County did maintain the road to the extent of blacktopping it, but that's been some years ago and the road has fallen into the state of disrepair as the photographs show. That is the road which is east of the five hundred point mark. The County, as I've said before, through legislative process including hearings has passed appropriate ordinances to acquire by condemnation, if necessary. And they not only have passed the ordinance to acquire the twenty foot right of way that these people have built their properties on, but also twenty feet more  ten feet on either side of the road. The evidence is the County services are difficult to provide  provide because [of] the condition of the road. And that in order to provide these services to the twenty to twenty-four homes, they are required to  they are required to acquire the road to maintain it, surface it and whatever is necessary to be done. To do this, the County has passed the ordinance as stated to acquire the twenty foot plus twenty foot of the defendants' property  ten feet on either side. As I said before, there is a presumption the legislative process was correct. The Court finds that as to the additional twenty feet, there has been no evidence to the effect that that was necessary to be acquired.[[1]] That the acquisition of that was arbitrary and capricious, that the twenty foot road that's been there has been adequate so far as size and shape to service this roadway and the  the houses in question, that the additional twenty feet, there may be all kinds of reasons for it, but there's been absolutely no reason given to the Court. And to the contrary, reasons have been given as to why it should not be acquired to the extent that it's too close to one of the defendant's houses. And I can see fences and what have you along the property line. As to the twenty foot right of way, the question is whether there is any evidence of a reasonable necessity. The Court finds that the only evidence that it's heard and it  that it has heard evidence to the effect that it's to service the twenty-four houses in question  the twenty to twenty-four in question. And to do so, it's going to do so at the expense of the three property owners here. Now as I've said before that happens in many condemnation cases that three are hurt for the purpose of twenty-four, but there must be some kind of overriding public purpose. And the Court finds none, that this is clearly for private need and the private need is for those twenty to twenty-four houses. That I just cannot believe that if there were one house at the end of this road, that the County would even be in here. And this case would have been over a long time ago if this had been one house, one private property. And what happens if there's two, well that would be the same problem and the same situation would apply and the same situation applies as to twenty or twenty-four. That there's been no evidence to the effect that there's any public need for this purpose. The only evidence is it's for the purpose of servicing these twenty-four properties and that is the evidence that has come into the effect that that's why it was done. And for that reason, the Court finds it's being acquired for a private purpose and will dismiss the petition."
 The County appealed to the Court of Special Appeals. We issued a writ of certiorari prior to argument in the intermediate appellate court.
 The appellees at oral argument seemed to concede that public necessity has been shown but denied public use. Since, however, the terms "public necessity" and "public use" have both been discussed in the opinion of the trial judge and in the briefs of both the landowners and the County, we shall deal with both points.
 II
 In Murphy v. State Roads Comm'n, 159 Md. 7, 149 A. 566 (1930), Judge Offutt said for the Court:
 "Ordinarily the question of whether a proposed highway is required by public necessity is legislative rather than judicial (Elliott on Roads and Streets, sec. 213; Nichols on Eminent Domain, secs. 333, 334); and while the question as to whether the proposed use is public in its nature may ultimately become a judicial one (Ibid., sec. 52; Van Witsen v. Gutman, 79 Md. 405 [29 A. 608]), when the Legislature has determined that a proposed improvement is public in its nature, the prima facie presumption is that the use thus declared to be public is public. Nichols, Eminent Domain, sec. 52. So too when the Legislature has determined that a proposed use is public in character, it may delegate, to a board, commission, or other agency, power to ascertain and determine what property is needed for that use, and the decision of such an agency as to the public necessity for taking particular property is not subject to judicial review unless its decision is so oppressive, arbitrary or unreasonable as to suggest bad faith. Nichols, Eminent Domain, secs. 333, 334." 159 Md. at 15.
 See also Free State Realty v. City of Balto., 279 Md. 550, 558-59, 369 A.2d 1030 (1977); Sollins v. Baltimore County, 253 Md. 407, 412, 252 A.2d 819 (1969); Kline v. City of Rockville, 245 Md. 625, 630, 227 A.2d 217 (1967); Wash. San. Comm. v. Santorios, 234 Md. 342, 345-46, 199 A.2d 206 (1964).
 There is not the slightest evidence in this case that the decision to condemn the land in question is so oppressive, arbitrary or unreasonable as to suggest bad faith. In Santorios, citing Johnson v. Gas & Electric Co., 187 Md. 454, 462, 50 A.2d 918 (1947), Judge Horney observed for the Court, "[I]t has been said that the necessity for the taking does not have to be absolute: all that is required is that it be reasonable under the circumstances." 234 Md. at 346. We hold that public necessity was established.
 III
 In Riden v. Philadelphia, B. & W.R.R., 182 Md. 336, 35 A.2d 99 (1943), Judge Delaplaine said for the Court:
 "In this State we have held that the words `public use,' as written in our Constitution, mean use by the public. We hold this view for three reasons: (1) It is the primary and more commonly understood meaning of the words. (2) At the time of the adoption of the second Constitution of 1851, the first of our organic instruments to contain a limitation upon the power of eminent domain, as well as the third Constitution of 1864, and our present Constitution of 1867, there was no practice in Maryland showing a contemporaneous construction that the term `public use' imported public benefit. (3) Our definition furnishes a more definite guide for the courts. Arnsperger v. Crawford, 101 Md. 247, 61 A. 413; Dobler v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore, 151 Md. 154, 164, 134 A. 201; Niles, Maryland Constitutional Law, 192-201." 182 Md. at 342, 35 A.2d 99.
 A somewhat similar statement, quoting from Lewis, Law of Eminent Domain, § 158, was made in Arnsperger v. Crawford, 101 Md. 247, 252-53, 61 A. 413 (1905), to the effect that "public use means the same as use by the public." (Emphasis in original.) Judge Pearce said for the Court of the words "public use":
 "There will be found two different views of the meaning of these words which have been taken by the Courts; one, there must be a use, or right of use by the public, or some limited portion of the public; the other that they are equivalent to public utility or advantage. If the former is the correct view, the Legislature and the Courts have a definite, fixed guide for their action; if the latter is to prevail, the enactment of laws upon this subject will reflect the passing popular feeling, and their construction, will reflect the various temperaments of the Judges, who are thus left free to indulge their own views of public utility or advantage. We cannot hesitate to range this Court with those which hold the former to be the true view. We agree with the Pennsylvania Court (Farmers Market Co. v. Phil. R.R. Co., 10 Pa. C. 25) that `the test whether a use is public or not, is whether a public trust is imposed upon the property, whether the public has a legal right to the use, which cannot be gainsaid, or denied, or withdrawn at the pleasure of the owner.'" 101 Md. at 253, 61 A. 413 (emphasis in original).
 The issue of public use has most recently been considered by us in Pr. George's Co. v. Collington, 275 Md. 171, 339 A.2d 278 (1975). We there found an industrial park to be a public use.
 There can be no dispute of the fact that condemnation of private property for a public highway or road is a proper public use. See, e.g., Bond v. M. & C.C. of Baltimore, 116 Md. 683, 82 A. 978 (1911). A determination that such is a public use is not affected by the fact that although the public may have the right to use a street it seldom does. A discussion of the limited use of roads with regard to public use is contained in 26 Am.Jur.2d Eminent Domain § 46 (1966), which states:
 "If the public has the right to use the way at pleasure and on equal terms, the way is a public one, even though in reality it is seldom used.... The public character of a road does not depend on the degree of public necessity or convenience that requires it, the extent to which the public uses it, or the number of persons that it accommodates. If it is intended for the use of the public and may be traveled by any person who desires to use it, the power of eminent domain may properly be exercised, even though an individual or a corporation may be deeply interested in, or benefited by, the opening of the way, it accommodates some individuals more than others, it may accommodate only a limited portion of the public or even only a single family, it is to be used merely for pleasure purposes, or it is subject to certain conditions as to its use...." Id. at 701-02.
 See also 29A C.J.S. Eminent Domain § 33, at 270-71 (1965); 2A Nichols, The Law of Eminent Domain, §§ 7.07, 7.22 [1] (Sackman ed. 1983).
 Arnsperger, 101 Md. 247, 61 A. 413, and Van Witsen v. Gutman, 79 Md. 405, 29 A. 608 (1894), relied upon by the landowners in support of their contention that this acquisition is for an impermissible private use, are readily distinguishable. In Arnsperger the Court declared unconstitutional a statute which permitted condemnation of land for a private outlet to a farm. In Van Witsen the Court held that the City of Baltimore could not close up an alley for the sole purpose of permitting a property owner whose land abutted on both sides of the alley to build in the bed of the alley when this would have the effect of denying other landowners a right of access over that portion of the alley to a public street.
 It is suggested that because this street is a dead end or cul de sac that this in some manner prevents it from being for public use. This issue is considered in 2A Nichols, The Law of Eminent Domain, § 7.22[1] which states:
 "[I]t is no legal objection that a proposed highway will be a cul de sac, or that it will lead to the residence or place of business of but one individual, for the public may desire to visit or do business with him. If a road is to be open for public travel the purpose for which the public may wish to travel is not material, and land may be taken by eminent domain for a road which is intended solely for driving for pleasure and recreation or to furnish a view of beautiful natural scenery. Streets are frequently laid out for the purpose of opening up private land, but if a street is to be open to public travel it is well settled that it is for the public use, although it is of especial convenience or advantage to certain individuals, or even if its sole or principal object is to enhance the value of the land through which it passes...." Id. at 7-129 to -132.
 See also 29A C.J.S. Eminent Domain § 33, at 273; 26 Am.Jur.2d Eminent Domain § 46, at 702; 1 Lewis, Law of Eminent Domain § 259, at 512-13 (3d ed. 1909); In re Knolls Crescent, Borough of Bronx, 117 N.Y.S.2d 835, 836-37 (1952); The People v. Kingman, 24 N.Y. 559, 568-69 (1862); Highway Commission v. Thornton, 271 N.C. 227, 243, 156 S.E.2d 248 (1967).
 This Court found public uses in New Cent. Co. v. George's Creek Co., 37 Md. 537 (1873) (Only use of the railroad spur was to transport coal for private business purposes.); Pitznogle v. Western Md. R.R., 119 Md. 673, 87 A. 917 (1913) (Railroad condemned land containing a private road for the purpose of constructing a railroad line; the Court permitted the railroad also to condemn a portion of an adjacent tract, partly for a railroad line and partly to build a substitute private road for the benefit of those persons entitled to use the private road which it had closed.); Marchant v. Baltimore, 146 Md. 513, 126 A. 884 (1924) (Land condemned for the construction of wharves, piers, docks, warehouses, and buildings for rental to private users.), and Riden, 182 Md. 336, 35 A.2d 99 (Land condemned for spur from a railroad's main line to a racetrack.).
 The road here when completed would be just as much a part of the public road system of Anne Arundel County as any other road in that county. The public would be entitled to use it to go to and from the businesses and residences located on it. We hold that the trial judge erred when he found that the road here was not for a public use.
 JUDGMENT REVERSED AND CASE REMANDED FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS CONSISTENT WITH THIS OPINION; APPELLEES TO PAY THE COSTS.
 NOTES
 [1] Back in the horse and buggy days of 1853 the General Assembly enacted Ch. 220 of the Acts of that year. Section 11, now codified as Code (1957, 1981 Repl.Vol.) Art. 25, § 145, provided relative to county commissioners that thenceforth "all roads which may be opened under the provisions of [that] act [] shall be at least thirty feet wide...." Any such road was declared to be a public road.


type: wikipedia

text:
Maryam d'Abo, född den 27 december 1960 i London, är en brittisk skådespelerska.
 Hennes pappa kommer från Nederländerna och hennes mamma är från Georgien. Hon är släkt med Olivia d'Abo.
 Hennes största filmroll var i James Bond-filmen Iskallt Uppdrag där hon spelar Bondbruden Kara Milovy som är cellist.
 Filmografi
 2002 - Doktor Zjivago
 1996 - Timelock
 1995 - Solitaire for 2
 1994 - The Browning Version
 1987 - Iskallt uppdrag
 1985 - White Nights
 Referenser
 Externa länkar
 Brittiska skådespelare
 Bondbrudar
 Födda 1960
 Kvinnor
 Levande personer
 Skådespelare från London


type: contracts

jurisdiction: EU

text:
 23.3.2022
 GA
 Iris Oifigiúil an Aontais Eorpaigh
 63
 COMHAONTÚ
 idir an tAontas Eorpach agus Poblacht na Seirbia maidir le rannpháirtíocht Phoblacht na Seirbia i gclár an Aontais, Fís Eorpach — an Clár Réime um Thaighde agus um Nuálaíocht
 An Coimisiún Eorpach (dá ngairtear “an Coimisiún” anseo feasta), thar ceann an Aontais Eorpaigh,
 de pháirt,
 agus
 Rialtas Phoblacht na Seirbia (dá ngairtear “an tSeirbia” anseo feasta),
 den pháirt eile,
 dá ngairtear “na Páirtithe” anseo feasta,
 DE BHRÍ go sonraítear sa Chreat-Chomhaontú idir an Comhphobal Eorpach agus an tSeirbia maidir leis na prionsabail ghinearálta i dtaca le rannpháirtíocht na Seirbia i gCláir Chomhphobail (1), de bhrí go sonraítear ann go ndéanfar na téarmaí agus na coinníollacha sonracha maidir le rannpháirtíocht na Seirbia i ngach clár sonrach, go háirithe an ranníocaíocht airgeadais is iníoctha, a chinneadh trí chomhaontú, i bhfoirm Meabhráin Tuisceana (2), idir an Coimisiún Eorpach agus údaráis inniúla na Seirbia;
 DE BHRÍ gur bunaíodh clár an Aontais Eorpaigh, Fís Eorpach — an Clár Réime um Thaighde agus um Nuálaíocht, le Rialachán (AE) 2021/695 ó Pharlaimint na hEorpa agus ón gComhairle (3) (dá ngairtear “an Clár Fís Eorpach” anseo feasta);
 I bhFIANAISE iarrachtaí an Aontais Eorpaigh an fhreagairt a stiúradh trí dhul i gcomhar lena chomhpháirtithe idirnáisiúnta chun aghaidh a thabhairt ar dhúshláin dhomhanda i gcomhréir leis an bplean gníomhaíochta ar mhaithe le daoine, an pláinéad agus an rathúnas i gClár Oibre na Náisiún Aontaithe “I mbun athraithe: Clár Oibre 2030 don Fhorbairt Inbhuanaithe”, agus á admháil dóibh gur uirlisí fíor-riachtanacha iad an taighde agus an nuálaíocht agus gurb iad is mó a spreagann an fás inbhuanaithe a bheidh á threorú ag an nuálaíocht, an t-iomaíochas agus an tarraingteacht eacnamaíoch;
 AG AITHINT DÓIBH na bprionsabal ginearálta mar a leagtar amach i Rialachán (AE) 2021/695;
 AG ADMHÁIL DÓIBH chuspóirí an Limistéir Eorpaigh Taighde athnuaite chun limistéar coiteann eolaíoch agus teicneolaíoch a fhorbairt, margadh aonair don taighde agus don nuálaíocht a chruthú, an comhar idir ollscoileanna agus malartú dea-chleachtas agus gairmeacha taighde tarraingteacha a chothú agus a éascú, soghluaisteacht trasteorann agus idirearnálach taighdeoirí a éascú, saorghluaiseacht eolais eolaíoch agus nuálaíochta eolaíche a chothú, an urraim don tsaoirse acadúil agus do shaoirse an taighde eolaíoch a chur chun cinn, tacú le hoideachas eolaíochta agus gníomhaíochtaí cumarsáide, agus iomaíochas agus tarraingteacht na ngeilleagar rannpháirteach a spreagadh, agus ag admháil dóibh gur príomh-chomhpháirtithe iad na tíortha comhlachaithe san iarracht sin;
 AG CUR I dTÁBHACHT ról na gComhpháirtíochtaí Eorpacha a thugann aghaidh ar roinnt de na dúshláin is práinní atá san Eoraip trí thionscnaimh chomhbheartaithe taighde agus nuálaíochta lena rannchuidítear go mór le tosaíochtaí an Aontais Eorpaigh i réimse an taighde agus na nuálaíochta ina bhfuil gá le mais chriticiúil agus fís fhadtéarmach agus tábhacht rannpháirtíocht na dtíortha comhlachaithe sna Comhpháirtíochtaí sin;
 I bhFIANAISE gur léir go bhfuil an taighde agus an nuálaíocht thar a bheith tábhachtach i réigiún na mBalcán Thiar i dtaca leis an gcomhar agus le tionscadail chomhpháirteacha taighde agus nuálaíochta a chistiú lena gcumasófar rochtain chomhpháirteach ar bharr feabhais, eolas, nuálaíocht, líonra agus acmhainní taighde. Tá deiseanna luachmhara curtha ar fáil aige don fhorbairt dhaonna, rud a chuirfidh go mór leis an dóchúlacht go n-éireoidh leis teacht ar réitigh chomhpháirteacha ar dhúshláin réigiúnacha agus dhomhanda;
 AG FÉACHAINT le coinníollacha comhthairbheacha a bhunú chun poist a chruthú, éiceachórais nuálaíochta na bPáirtithe a neartú agus tacú leo trí chabhrú le fiontair nuálaíocht agus méadú a dhéanamh i margaí na bPáirtithe agus trí ghlacadh na nuálaíochta, mar aon le cur in úsáid agus inrochtaineacht na nuálaíochta, a éascú, lena n-áirítear gníomhaíochtaí fothaithe acmhainneachta;
 AG AITHINT DÓIBH gur cheart go dtiocfadh sochair fhrithpháirteacha as rannpháirtíocht chómhalartach i gcláir thaighde agus nuálaíochta a chéile; agus á admháil dóibh go bhforchoimeádann na Páirtithe a gceart chun teorainn nó coinníoll a chur le rannpháirtíocht ina gcláir thaighde agus nuálaíochta; lena n-áirítear, go háirithe, i gcás gníomhaíochtaí a bhaineann lena sócmhainní straitéiseacha, leasanna, neamhspleáchas nó slándáil;
 I bhFIANAISE spriocanna coiteanna, luachanna agus naisc láidre na bPáirtithe i réimse an taighde agus na nuálaíochta, arna mbunú san am a chuaigh thart trí na Comhaontuithe Comhlachais a ghabh leis na Cláir Réime ina dhiaidh sin, agus ag aithint dóibh mian chomhchoiteann na bPáirtithe a gcaidreamh agus an comhar eatarthu a fhorbairt, a neartú, a spreagadh agus a shíneadh a thuilleadh ann,
 TAR ÉIS COMHAONTÚ MAR A LEANAS:
 Airteagal 1
 Raon feidhme an chomhlachais
 1. Glacfaidh an tSeirbia páirt mar thír chomhlachaithe i ngach cuid den Chlár Fís Eorpach — an Clár Réime um Thaighde agus um Nuálaíocht (an Clár Fís Eorpach), agus rannchuideoidh sí le gach cuid de, dá dtagraítear in Airteagal 4 de Rialachán (AE) 2021/695 agus a chuirtear chun feidhme trí bhíthin an chláir shonraigh arna bhunú le Cinneadh (AE) 2021/764 (4), sna leaganacha is cothroime le dáta díobh, agus trí bhíthin ranníocaíocht airgeadais leis an Institiúid Eorpach um Nuálaíocht agus Teicneolaíocht.
 2. Beidh feidhm ag Rialachán (AE) 2021/819 ó Pharlaimint na hEorpa agus ón gComhairle (5), agus Cinneadh (AE) 2021/820 (6), sna leaganacha is cothroime le dáta díobh, beidh feidhm acu maidir le rannpháirtíocht eintitis dhlítheanacha na Seirbia i bPobail Eolais agus Nuálaíochta.
 Airteagal 2
 Téarmaí agus coinníollacha sonracha na rannpháirtíochta sa Chlár Fís Eorpach
 1. Glacfaidh an tSeirbia páirt sa Chlár Fís Eorpach i gcomhréir leis na coinníollacha a leagtar síos sa Chreat-Chomhaontú idir an Comhphobal Eorpach agus an tSeirbia maidir leis na prionsabail ghinearálta i dtaca le rannpháirtíocht na Seirbia i gcláir Chomhphobail, agus faoi na téarmaí agus na coinníollacha a leagtar amach sa Chomhaontú seo, sna gníomhartha dlí dá dtagraítear in Airteagal 1 den Chomhaontú seo, agus in aon riail eile a bhaineann le cur chun feidhme an Chláir Fís Eorpach, sna leaganacha is cothroime le dáta díobh.
 2. Mura bhforáiltear a mhalairt sna téarmaí agus sna coinníollacha dá dtagraítear i mír 1 den Airteagal seo, lena n-áirítear i gcur chun feidhme Airteagal 22(5) de Rialachán (AE) 2021/695, féadfaidh eintitis dhlítheanacha atá bunaithe sa tSeirbia páirt a ghlacadh i ngníomhaíochtaí indíreacha an Chláir Fís Eorpach faoi choinníollacha atá coibhéiseach leis na coinníollacha is infheidhme maidir le heintitis dhlítheanacha atá bunaithe san Aontas Eorpach, lena n-áirítear urraim do bhearta sriantacha an Aontais Eorpaigh (7).
 3. Sula ndéanfar cinneadh maidir le cé acu atá nó nach bhfuil eintitis dhlítheanacha atá bunaithe sa tSeirbia incháilithe chun páirt a ghlacadh i ngníomhaíocht a bhaineann le sócmhainní straitéiseacha, leasanna, neamhspleáchas nó slándáil an Aontais Eorpaigh faoi Airteagal 22(5) de Rialachán (AE) 2021/695, féadfaidh an Coimisiún faisnéis nó dearbhuithe sonracha a iarraidh, amhail:
 a)
 faisnéis maidir le cé acu a deonaíodh nó a dheonófar rochtain chómhalartach d’eintitis dhlítheanacha atá bunaithe san Aontas Eorpach ar chláir nó ar ghníomhartha na Seirbia atá ann cheana agus atá beartaithe, ar cláir agus gníomhartha iad atá coibhéiseach leis an ngníomhaíocht Fís Eorpach lena mbaineann;
 b)
 faisnéis maidir le cé acu atá nó nach bhfuil sásra náisiúnta um scagadh ar infheistíocht ag an tSeirbia agus dearbhuithe go ndéanfaidh údaráis na Seirbia tuairisciú chuig an gCoimisiún agus go rachaidh siad i gcomhairle leis maidir le haon chás féideartha i gcás, agus sásra den chineál sin á chur i bhfeidhm, ina bhfaighidh siad eolas faoi infheistíocht eachtrach/táthcheangal atá beartaithe ag eintiteas atá bunaithe lasmuigh den tSeirbia, nó atá á rialú ó lasmuigh di, ar eintiteas dlítheanach de chuid na Seirbia, a fuair cistiú ó Fhís Eorpach i ngníomhaíochtaí a bhaineann le sócmhainní straitéiseacha, leasanna, neamhspleáchas nó slándáil an Aontais, ar choinníoll go soláthróidh an Coimisiún don tSeirbia liosta de na heintitis dhlítheanacha ábhartha atá bunaithe sa tSeirbia tar éis shíniú na gcomhaontuithe deontais leis na heintitis sin; agus
 c)
 dearbhuithe nach mbeidh aon cheann de na torthaí, na teicneolaíochtaí, na seirbhísí nó na táirgí arna bhforbairt faoi na gníomhaíochtaí lena mbaineann ag eintitis atá bunaithe sa tSeirbia faoi réir srianta ar a n-onnmhairiú chuig Ballstáit an Aontais Eorpaigh le linn na gníomhaíochta agus ar feadh 4 bliana tar éis dheireadh na gníomhaíochta. Roinnfidh an tSeirbia liosta cothrom le dáta de na hábhair maidir le srianta náisiúnta ar onnmhairiú ar bhonn bliantúil, le linn na gníomhaíochta agus ar feadh 4 bliana tar éis dheireadh na gníomhaíochta.
 4. Féadfaidh eintitis dhlítheanacha atá bunaithe sa tSeirbia páirt a ghlacadh i ngníomhaíochtaí an Airmheáin Chomhpháirtigh Taighde (JRC), faoi théarmaí agus coinníollacha atá coibhéiseach leis na téarmaí agus na coinníollacha is infheidhme maidir le heintitis dhlítheanacha atá bunaithe san Aontas Eorpach ach amháin má tá gá le teorainneacha chun comhsheasmhacht a áirithiú le raon feidhme na rannpháirtíochta a eascraíonn as cur chun feidhme mhír 2 agus 3 den Airteagal seo.
 5. I gcás ina gcuirfidh an tAontas Eorpach an Clár Fís Eorpach chun feidhme trí Airteagal 185 agus Airteagal 187 den Chonradh ar Fheidhmiú an Aontais Eorpaigh a chur i bhfeidhm, féadfaidh an tSeirbia agus eintitis dhlítheanacha na Seirbia páirt a ghlacadh sna struchtúir dhlíthiúla a chruthaítear faoi na forálacha sin, i gcomhréir le gníomhartha dlí de chuid an Aontais Eorpaigh a glacadh nó a ghlacfar chun na struchtúir dhlíthiúla sin a bhunú.
 6. Beidh sé de cheart ag ionadaithe na Seirbia páirt a ghlacadh mar bhreathnóirí sa choiste dá dtagraítear in Airteagal 14 de Chinneadh (AE) 2021/764, gan cearta vótála agus le haghaidh pointí a bhaineann leis an tSeirbia.
 Tiocfaidh na coistí seo le chéile gan ionadaithe na Seirbia a bheith i láthair tráth na vótála. Cuirfear an tSeirbia ar an eolas faoin toradh.
 An fhoirm a bheidh ar an rannpháirtíocht dá dtagraítear sa mhír seo, lena n-áirítear nósanna imeachta maidir le faisnéis agus doiciméadacht a fháil, beidh sí ar aon fhoirm leis an bhfoirm is infheidhme maidir le hionadaithe ó Bhallstáit an Aontais Eorpaigh.
 7. Na cearta is infheidhme maidir le tíortha comhlachaithe, sin iad na cearta ionadaíochta agus rannpháirtíochta a bheidh ag an tSeirbia sa Choiste um an Limistéar Eorpach Taighde agus ina fhoghrúpaí.
 8. Beidh sé de cheart ag ionadaithe na Seirbia páirt a ghlacadh mar bhreathnóirí ar Bhord Gobharnóirí JRC, gan cearta vótála a bheith acu. Faoi réir an choinníll sin, rialófar an rannpháirtíocht sin leis na rialacha agus na nósanna imeachta céanna is infheidhme maidir le hionadaithe Bhallstáit an Aontais Eorpaigh, lena n-áirítear cearta labhartha agus nósanna imeachta maidir le faisnéis agus doiciméadacht a fháil i ndáil le pointe a bhaineann leis an tSeirbia.
 9. Féadfaidh an tSeirbia páirt a ghlacadh i gCuibhreannas don Bhonneagar Taighde Eorpach (ERIC) i gcomhréir le Rialachán (CE) Uimh. 723/2009 ón gComhairle (8), sa leagan is cothroime le dáta de, agus leis an ngníomh dlí lena mbunaítear ERIC.
 10. Na costais taistil agus na speansais chothaithe a thabhóidh ionadaithe agus saineolaithe na Seirbia as bheith páirteach mar bhreathnóirí in obair an choiste dá dtagraítear in Airteagal 14 de Chinneadh (AE) 2021/764, nó i gcruinnithe eile a bhaineann le cur chun feidhme an Chláir Fís Eorpach, aisíocfaidh an tAontas Eorpach iad ar an mbonn céanna agus i gcomhréir leis na nósanna imeachta atá i bhfeidhm le haghaidh ionadaithe Bhallstáit an Aontais Eorpaigh.
 11. Déanfaidh na Páirtithe gach iarracht, laistigh de chreat na bhforálacha atá ann cheana, chun saorghluaiseacht agus áit chónaithe na n-eolaithe a ghlacann páirt sna gníomhaíochtaí a chumhdaítear leis an gComhaontú seo a éascú agus chun gluaiseacht trasteorann earraí agus seirbhísí atá ceaptha lena n-úsáid i ngníomhaíochtaí den sórt sin a éascú.
 12. Déanfaidh an tSeirbia na bearta uile is gá, mar is iomchuí, chun a áirithiú go mbeidh earraí agus seirbhísí, a cheannófar sa tSeirbia nó a allmhaireofar isteach sa tSeirbia, arb earraí agus seirbhísí iad a mhaoinítear i bpáirt nó go hiomlán de bhun na gcomhaontuithe deontais agus/nó na gconarthaí a tugadh i gcrích chun na gníomhaíochtaí a bhaint amach i gcomhréir leis an gComhaontú seo, go mbeidh siad díolmhaithe ó dhleachtanna custaim, ó dhleachtanna allmhairiúcháin agus ó mhuirir fhioscacha eile, lena n-áirítear CBL, is infheidhme sa tSeirbia.
 Airteagal 3
 Ranníocaíocht airgeadais
 1. Rannpháirtíocht na Seirbia nó rannpháirtíocht eintitis dhlítheanacha na Seirbia sa Chlár Fís Eorpach, beidh sí faoi réir ranníocaíocht airgeadais ón tSeirbia leis an gClár agus leis na costais ghaolmhara bhainistíochta, chur i bhfeidhm agus oibriúcháin faoi bhuiséad ginearálta an Aontais Eorpaigh (dá ngairtear “buiséad an Aontais” anseo feasta).
 2. Is éard a bheidh sa ranníocaíocht airgeadais suim na méideanna seo a leanas:
 a)
 ranníocaíocht oibríochtúil; agus
 b)
 táille rannpháirtíochta.
 3. Beidh an ranníocaíocht airgeadais i bhfoirm íocaíochta bliantúla a dhéanfar in dhá thráthchuid, agus beidh sí le híoc i mí na Bealtaine agus i mí Iúil ar a dhéanaí.
 4. Cumhdófar leis an ranníocaíocht oibríochtúil caiteachas oibríochtúil agus caiteachas tacaíochta an Chláir agus beidh sí sa bhreis, i gcás leithreasuithe faoi chomhair gealltanas agus leithreasuithe íocaíochta araon, ar na méideanna arna n-iontráil i mbuiséad an Aontais Eorpaigh arna ghlacadh go cinntitheach le haghaidh an Cháir Fís Eorpach, lena n-áirítear aon leithreasú a chomhfhreagraíonn do ghealltanais saortha a chuirtear ar fáil arís dá dtagraítear in Airteagal 15(3) de Rialachán (AE, Euratom) 2018/1046 ó Pharlaimint na hEorpa agus ón gComhairle (9), sa leagan is cothroime le dáta de (dá ngairtear “an Rialachán Airgeadais” anseo feasta), agus arna méadú le hioncam sannta seachtrach nach n-eascraíonn as ranníocaíochtaí airgeadais leis an gClár Fís Eorpach ó dheontóirí (10) eile.
 I gcás ioncam sannta seachtrach a leithdháiltear ar an gClár Fís Eorpach faoi Airteagal 3.1 de Rialachán (AE) 2020/2094 ón gComhairle lena mbunaítear Ionstraim Théarnaimh de chuid an Aontais Eorpaigh chun tacú leis an téarnamh i ndiaidh ghéarchéim COVID-19 (11), comhfhreagróidh an méadú seo do na leithreasuithe bliantúla a léirítear sna doiciméid a ghabhann leis an Dréachtbhuiséad maidir leis an gClár Fís Eorpach.
 5. Beidh an ranníocaíocht oibríochtúil tosaigh bunaithe ar threoir ranníoca arna sainiú mar an cóimheas idir Olltáirgeacht Intíre (OTI) na Seirbia ag praghsanna an mhargaidh agus OTI an Aontais Eorpaigh ag praghsanna an mhargaidh. Is iad seirbhísí tiomnaithe an Choimisiúin a chinnfidh na OTInna ag praghsanna an mhargaidh a bheidh le cur i bhfeidhm bunaithe ar na sonraí staidrimh is déanaí atá ar fáil do ríomhanna buiséid sa bhliain roimh an mbliain ina mbeidh an íocaíocht bhliantúil le híoc. De mhaolú air sin, le haghaidh 2021, is ar OTI na bliana 2019 ag praghsanna an mhargaidh a bheidh an ranníocaíocht oibríochtúil tosaigh bunaithe. Leagtar síos coigeartuithe ar an treoir ranníoca sin in Iarscríbhinn I.
 6. Ríomhfar an ranníocaíocht oibríochtúil tosaigh tríd an treoir ranníoca, arna coigeartú, a chur i bhfeidhm ar na leithreasuithe faoi chomhair gealltanas tosaigh arna n-iontráil i mbuiséad an Aontais Eorpaigh a ghlacfar go cinntitheach i leith na bliana is infheidhme chun an Clár Fís Eorpach a mhaoiniú, leithreasuithe a mhéadófar i gcomhréir le mír 4 den Airteagal seo.
 7. Is 4 % den ranníocaíocht oibríochtúil bhliantúil tosaigh a bheidh sa táille rannpháirtíochta, táille a ríomhfar i gcomhréir le mír 5 agus 6 den Airteagal seo, agus déanfar í a chéimniú isteach mar a leagtar amach in Iarscríbhinn I. Ní bheidh an táille rannpháirtíochta faoi réir coigeartuithe ná ceartuithe cúlghabhálacha.
 8. Féadfar an ranníocaíocht oibríochtúil tosaigh le haghaidh bhliain N a choigeartú suas nó síos go cúlghabhálach i mbliain amháin nó níos mó blianta ina dhiaidh sin ar bhonn na ngealltanas buiséadach a dhéanfar maidir leis na leithreasuithe faoi chomhair gealltanas le haghaidh bhliain N sin, ranníocaíocht a mhéadófar i gcomhréir le mír 4 den Airteagal seo, agus ar bhonn chur chun feidhme a ngealltanas dlíthiúil agus a ngealltanas saortha. Leagtar amach na forálacha mionsonraithe maidir le cur chun feidhme an Airteagail seo in Iarscríbhinn I.
 9. Soláthróidh an tAontas Eorpach don tSeirbia faisnéis i ndáil lena rannpháirtíocht airgeadais mar a áirítear san fhaisnéis bhuiséadach, chuntasaíochta, feidhmíochta agus mheastóireachta arna soláthar d’údaráis bhuiséadacha agus d’údaráis um urscaoileadh an Aontais Eorpaigh maidir leis an gClár Fís Eorpach. Soláthrófar an fhaisnéis sin agus aird chuí á tabhairt do rialacha rúndachta agus cosanta sonraí an Aontais Eorpaigh agus na Seirbia agus beidh sí gan dochar don fhaisnéis atá an tSeirbia i dteideal a fháil faoi Iarscríbhinn III.
 10. Is in euro a dhéanfar ranníocaíochtaí uile na Seirbia nó na híocaíochtaí uile ón Aontas Eorpach agus is in euro a ríomhfar na méideanna a bheidh dlite nó le fáil.
 Airteagal 4
 Sásra ceartúcháin uathoibríoch
 1. Beidh feidhm ag sásra ceartúcháin uathoibríoch ranníocaíocht oibríochtúil tosaigh na Seirbia le haghaidh bhliain N, a choigeartófar i gcomhréir le hAirteagal 3(8), agus déanfar é a ríomh i mbliain N+2. Beidh sé bunaithe ar fheidhmíocht na Seirbia agus ar fheidhmíocht eintitis dhlítheanacha na Seirbia sna codanna sin den Chlár Fís Eorpach a chuirtear chun feidhme trí dheontais iomaíocha a mhaoinítear le leithreasuithe faoi chomhair gealltanas na bliana N, a mhéadófar i gcomhréir le hAirteagal 3(4).
 Déanfar méid an cheartúcháin uathoibríoch a ríomh bunaithe ar an difríocht idir:
 a)
 méideanna tosaigh na ngealltanas dlíthiúil le haghaidh deontais iomaíocha a dhéanfar iarbhír leis an tSeirbia nó le heintitis dhlítheanacha na Seirbia a mhaoineofar le leithreasuithe faoi chomhair gealltanas na bliana N, leithreasuithe a mhéadófar i gcomhréir le hAirteagal 3(4); agus
 b)
 an ranníocaíocht oibríochtúil chomhfhreagrach do bhliain N a íocfaidh an tSeirbia de réir a choigeartófar de bhun Airteagal 3(8), cé is moite de chostais neamh-idirghabhálacha arna maoiniú le leithreasuithe faoi chomhair gealltanas ó bhliain N, leithreasuithe a mhéadófar i gcomhréir le hAirteagal 3(4).
 2. I gcás inar mó an méid dá dtagraítear i mír 1, cibé acu atá an méid sin dearfach nó diúltach, ná 8 % den ranníocaíocht oibríochtúil tosaigh chomhfhreagrach arna coigeartú de bhun Airteagal 3(8), ceartófar ranníocaíocht oibríochtúil tosaigh na Seirbia le haghaidh bhliain N. Is é an méid a sháraíonn an tairseach 8 % sin an méid a bheidh dlite nó le fáil ag an tSeirbia mar ranníocaíocht bhreise nó mar laghdú ar ranníocaíocht na Seirbia faoin sásra ceartúcháin uathoibríoch. Ní chuirfear an méid faoin tairseach 8 % sin san áireamh agus an ranníocaíocht bhreise atá dlite nó le cúiteamh á ríomh.
 3. Leagtar síos rialacha mionsonraithe maidir leis an sásra ceartúcháin uathoibríoch in Iarscríbhinn I.
 Airteagal 5
 Cómhalartacht
 1. Féadfaidh eintitis dhlítheanacha atá bunaithe san Aontas Eorpach páirt a ghlacadh i gcláir agus i ngníomhartha na Seirbia atá coibhéiseach leis an gClár Fís Eorpach, i gcomhréir le reachtaíocht na Seirbia.
 2. Soláthraítear liosta neamh-uileghabhálach de chláir agus de ghníomhartha coibhéiseacha na Seirbia in Iarscríbhinn II.
 3. Beidh cistiú ó eintitis dhlítheanacha na Seirbia atá bunaithe san Aontas Eorpach faoi réir reachtaíocht na Seirbia lena rialaítear oibriú na gclár agus na ngníomhartha taighde agus nuálaíochta. I gcás nach soláthrófar cistiú, féadfaidh eintitis dhlítheanacha atá bunaithe san Aontas páirt a ghlacadh trí bhíthin a gcuid acmhainní féin.
 Airteagal 6
 An Eolaíocht Oscailte
 Déanfaidh na Páirtithe cleachtais eolaíochta oscailte a chur chun cinn agus a spreagadh go frithpháirteach ina gcuid clár agus gníomhartha i gcomhréir le rialacha an Chláir Fís Eorpach agus le reachtaíocht na Seirbia.
 Airteagal 7
 Faireachán, Meastóireacht agus Tuairisciú
 1. Gan dochar do fhreagrachtaí an Choimisiúin, na hOifige Eorpaí Frith-Chalaoise (OLAF) agus Chúirt Iniúchóirí an Aontais Eorpaigh i ndáil le faireachán agus meastóireacht a dhéanamh ar an gClár Fís Eorpach, déanfar faireachán leanúnach ar rannpháirtíocht na Seirbia sa Chlár sin ar bhonn comhpháirtíochta lena mbeidh baint ag an gCoimisiún agus ag an tSeirbia.
 2. Leagtar síos in Iarscríbhinn III na rialacha maidir leis an mbainistíocht fhónta airgeadais, lena n-áirítear bearta rialaithe airgeadais, na bearta téarnaimh agus na bearta frithchalaoise eile i ndáil le cistiú ón Aontas Eorpach faoin gComhaontú seo.
 Airteagal 8
 Comhchoiste idir an tAontas Eorpach agus an tSeirbia um Thaighde agus um Nuálaíocht
 1. Bunaítear leis seo an Comhchoiste idir an tAontas Eorpach agus an tSeirbia um Thaighde agus um Nuálaíocht (dá ngairtear “an Comhchoiste idir an tAontas Eorpach agus an tSeirbia” anseo feasta). Áireofar an méid seo a leanas i gcúraimí an Chomhchoiste idir an tAontas Eorpach agus an tSeirbia:
 a)
 measúnú, meastóireacht agus athbhreithniú a dhéanamh ar chur chun feidhme an Chomhaontaithe seo, go háirithe:
 (i)
 rannpháirtíocht agus feidhmíocht eintitis dhlítheanacha na Seirbia sa Chlár Fís Eorpach;
 (ii)
 leibhéal oscailteachta (frithpháirtí) na n-eintiteas dlítheanach atá bunaithe i ngach Páirtí páirt a ghlacadh i gcláir agus i ngníomhartha an Pháirtí eile;
 (iii)
 cur chun feidhme an tsásra ranníocaíochta airgeadais agus an tsásra ceartúcháin uathoibríoch i gcomhréir le hAirteagal 3 agus 4;
 (iv)
 malartú faisnéise agus scrúdú a dhéanamh ar aon cheist a d’fhéadfadh a bheith ann maidir le saothrú torthaí, lena n-áirítear cearta maoine intleachtúla;
 b)
 plé a dhéanamh, arna iarraidh sin do cheachtar Páirtí, ar shrianta arna gcur i bhfeidhm nó atá beartaithe ag na Páirtithe ar an rochtain ar a gcláir thaighde agus nuálaíochta féin, lena n-áirítear go háirithe i gcás gníomhaíochtaí a bhaineann lena sócmhainní straitéiseacha, leasanna, neamhspleáchas nó slándáil;
 c)
 scrúdú a dhéanamh ar an gcaoi ar féidir comhar a fheabhsú agus a fhorbairt;
 d)
 plé comhpháirteach a dhéanamh ar threoshuíomhanna agus ar thosaíochtaí na mbeartas a bheidh ann amach anseo a bhaineann leis an taighde agus an nuálaíocht agus le pleanáil taighde leasa choitinn; agus
 e)
 malartú faisnéise, inter alia, maidir le reachtaíocht nua, cinntí nua nó cláir thaighde agus nuálaíochta náisiúnta nua atá ábhartha maidir le cur chun feidhme an Chomhaontaithe seo.
 2. Déanfaidh an Comhchoiste idir an tAontas Eorpach agus an tSeirbia, ar a mbeidh ionadaithe an Aontais Eorpaigh agus na Seirbia, a Rialacha Nós Imeachta a ghlacadh.
 3. Féadfaidh an Comhchoiste idir an tAontas Eorpach agus an tSeirbia a chinneadh aon mheitheal/aon chomhlacht comhairleach a bhunú ar bhonn ad hoc ar leibhéal na saineolaithe a bheidh in ann cúnamh a thabhairt an Comhaontú seo a chur chun feidhme.
 4. Tiocfaidh an Comhchoiste idir an tAontas Eorpach agus an tSeirbia le chéile uair amháin sa bhliain ar a laghad, agus, i gcás ina n-éileofar sin le himthosca speisialta, arna iarraidh sin d’aon Pháirtí. Déanfaidh an tAontas Eorpach agus Údarás Náisiúnta na Seirbia na cruinnithe a eagrú agus a óstáil ar bhonn idirmhalartach.
 5. Oibreoidh an Comhchoiste idir an tAontas Eorpach agus an tSeirbia ar bhonn leanúnach trí fhaisnéis ábhartha a mhalartú trí bhíthin aon mhodh cumarsáide; go háirithe a mhéid a bhaineann le rannpháirtíocht/feidhmíocht eintitis dhlítheanacha na Seirbia. Féadfaidh an Comhchoiste idir an tAontas Eorpach agus an tSeirbia, go háirithe, a chuid cúraimí a dhéanamh i scríbhinn aon uair is gá.
 Airteagal 9
 Forálacha críochnaitheacha
 1. Tiocfaidh an Comhaontú seo i bhfeidhm ar an dáta a thabharfaidh an dá Pháirtí fógra dá chéile gur cuireadh i gcrích a nósanna imeachta inmheánacha is gá chun na críche sin.
 2. Beidh feidhm ag an gComhaontú seo ón 1 Eanáir 2021. Fanfaidh sé i bhfeidhm chomh fada agus is gá chun go dtabharfar i gcrích na tionscadail, na gníomhartha agus na gníomhaíochtaí uile, nó codanna díobh, a mhaoineofar ón gClár Eorpach Fís, na gníomhartha uile is gá chun leasanna airgeadais an Aontais Eorpaigh a chosaint agus na hoibleagáidí airgeadais uile a eascraíonn as cur chun feidhme an Comhaontaithe seo idir na Páirtithe.
 3. Féadfaidh an tAontas Eorpach agus an tSeirbia an Comhaontú seo a chur i bhfeidhm go sealadach i gcomhréir lena gcuid nósanna imeachta inmheánacha agus reachtaíochta féin. Tosóidh an cur i bhfeidhm sealadach ar an dáta a thabharfaidh an dá Pháirtí fógra dá chéile gur cuireadh i gcrích a nósanna imeachta inmheánacha is gá chun na críche sin.
 4. Sa chás go dtabharfaidh an tSeirbia fógra don Choimisiún, ag feidhmiú dó thar ceann an Aontais Eorpaigh, nach gcuirfidh siad i gcrích a nósanna imeachta inmheánacha is gá le haghaidh theacht i bhfeidhm an Chomhaontaithe seo, scoirfidh an Comhaontú seo d’fheidhm shealadach a bheith aige ar an dáta a gheobhaidh an Coimisiún an fógra sin, arb éard a bheidh sa dáta sin an dáta scoir chun críocha an Chomhaontaithe seo.
 5. Féadfaidh an tAontas Eorpach cur i bhfeidhm an Chomhaontaithe seo a chur ar fionraí i gcás neamhíocaíocht pháirteach nó neamhíocaíocht iomlán na ranníocaíochta airgeadais atá dlite ag an tSeirbia faoin gComhaontú seo.
 I gcás neamhíocaíocht a d’fhéadfadh cur chun feidhme agus bainistiú an Chláir Fís Eorpach a chur i mbaol go mór, seolfaidh an Coimisiún litir mheabhrúcháin fhoirmiúil. I gcás nach ndéanfar aon íocaíocht laistigh de 20 lá oibre tar éis na litreach meabhrúcháin foirmiúla, tabharfaidh an Coimisiún fógra don tSeirbia maidir le cur ar fionraí chur i bhfeidhm an Chomhaontaithe seo trí litir fógra fhoirmiúil agus tiocfaidh an fhionraí i bhfeidhm 15 lá tar éis don tSeirbia an fógra sin a fháil.
 I gcás ina gcuirfear cur i bhfeidhm an Comhaontaithe seo ar fionraí, ní bheidh eintitis dhlítheanacha atá bunaithe sa tSeirbia incháilithe páirt a ghlacadh i nósanna imeachta dámhachtana nach bhfuil tugtha i gcrích go fóill nuair a chuirfear an fhionraí i bhfeidhm. Measfar nós imeachta dámhachtana a bheith tugtha i gcrích nuair a ghlacfar gealltanais dhlíthiúla de láimh mar thoradh ar an nós imeachta sin.
 Leis an bhfionraí, ní dhéanfar difear do na gealltanais dhlíthiúla arna ndéanamh de láimh leis na heintitis dhlítheanacha atá bunaithe sa tSeirbia sular tháinig an fhionraí i bhfeidhm. Leanfaidh an Comhaontú seo d’fheidhm a bheith aige maidir le gealltanais dhlíthiúla den sórt sin.
 Tabharfaidh an tAontas Eorpach fógra láithreach don tSeirbia a luaithe a gheobhaidh an tAontas Eorpach méid iomlán na ranníocaíochta airgeadais atá dlite. Cuirfear deireadh leis an bhfionraí le héifeacht láithreach ar an bhfógra sin a thabhairt.
 Ón dáta a chuirfear deireadh leis an bhfionraí, beidh eintitis dhlítheanacha na Seirbia incháilithe arís le haghaidh nósanna imeachta dámhachtana a sheolfar tar éis an dáta sin agus le haghaidh nósanna imeachta dámhachtana a seoladh roimh an dáta sin, ar nósanna imeachta dámhachtana iad nach bhfuil na sprioc-amanna chun iarratais a chur isteach dulta in éag.
 6. Féadfaidh ceachtar Páirtí an Comhaontú seo a fhoirceannadh tráth ar bith trí fhógra i scríbhinn a thabhairt go bhfuil sé beartaithe é a fhoirceannadh. Tiocfaidh an foirceannadh i bhfeidhm trí mhí féilire tar éis an dáta a gheobhaidh an seolaí an fógra i scríbhinn. Is éard a bheidh sa dáta foirceanta chun críocha an Chomhaontaithe seo, an dáta a thiocfaidh an foirceannadh i bhfeidhm.
 7. I gcás ina scoirfidh an Comhaontú seo d’fheidhm shealadach a bheith aige i gcomhréir le mír 4 den Airteagal seo nó i gcás ina ndéanfar é a fhoirceannadh i gcomhréir le mír 6 den Airteagal seo, comhaontaíonn na Páirtithe gurb amhlaidh:
 (a)
 leanfar le tionscadail, gníomhartha agus gníomhaíochtaí, nó codanna díobh, a ndearnadh gealltanais dhlíthiúla a ghlacadh de láimh ina leith le linn chur i bhfeidhm sealadach agus/nó tar éis theacht i bhfeidhm an Chomhaontaithe seo, agus sula scoirfidh an Comhaontú seo d’fheidhm a bheith aige nó sula ndéanfar é a fhoirceannadh, leanfar leo go dtí go dtabharfar i gcrích iad faoi na coinníollacha a leagtar síos sa Chomhaontú seo;
 (b)
 íocfar ina hiomláine i gcomhréir le hAirteagal 3 ranníocaíocht airgeadais bhliantúil bhliain N, ar lena linn a scoirfidh an Comhaontú seo d’fheidhm shealadach a bheith aige nó a dhéanfar é a fhoirceannadh. Déanfar ranníocaíocht oibríochtúil bhliain N a choigeartú i gcomhréir le hAirteagal 3(8) agus a cheartú i gcomhréir le hAirteagal 4 den Chomhaontú seo. Ní dhéanfar an táille rannpháirtíochta a íocfar le haghaidh bhliain N a choigeartú ná a cheartú;
 (c)
 tar éis na bliana ar lena linn a scoirfidh an Comhaontú seo d’fheidhm shealadach a bheith aige nó a dhéanfar é a fhoirceannadh, déanfar na ranníocaíochtaí oibríochtúla tosaigh, a íocadh le haghaidh na mblianta ar lena linn a bhí feidhm ag an gComhaontú seo, a choigeartú i gcomhréir le hAirteagal 3(8) agus ceartófar go huathoibríoch iad i gcomhréir le hAirteagal 4 den Chomhaontú seo; agus
 Socróidh na Páirtithe de chomhthoil aon iarmhairt eile a ghabhann le cur i bhfeidhm sealadach an Chomhaontaithe seo a fhoirceannadh nó a scor.
 8. Ní fhéadfar an Comhaontú seo a leasú ach amháin i scríbhinn de chomhthoil na bPáirtithe. Leanfaidh teacht i bhfeidhm na leasuithe an nós imeachta céanna is infheidhme maidir le teacht i bhfeidhm an Chomhaontaithe seo.
 9. Cuid dhílis den Chomhaontú seo a bheidh sna hIarscríbhinní a ghabhann leis.
 Dréachtófar an Comhaontú seo i ndúblach i mBéarla agus sa tSeirbis, agus comhúdarás ag gach téacs. I gcás ina mbeidh éagsúlacht sa léirmhíniú, is ag an téacs Béarla a bheidh an forlámhas.
 Arna dhéanamh sa Bhruiséil, an 6ú lá de mhí na Nollag, agus i mBéalgrád, an 1ú lá de mhí na Nollag sa bhliain 2021.
 Thar ceann an Choimisiúin, thar ceann an Aontais Eorpaigh,
 Mariya GABRIEL
 An Coimisinéir um Nuálaíocht, um Thaighde, um Chultúr, um Oideachas agus um an Óige
 Thar ceann Rialtas Phoblacht na Seirbia,
 Branko RUŽIĆ
 An Chéad Leas-Phríomh-Aire agus an tAire Oideachais, Eolaíochta agus Forbartha Teicneolaíche
 (1) IO L 192, 22.7.2005, lch. 29.
 (2) Is Meabhrán Tuisceana atá sa Chomhaontú seo a bhfuil na héifeachtaí dlíthiúla céanna aige agus atá ag an Meabhrán Tuisceana a shonraítear faoin gCreat-Chomhaontú idir an Comhphobal Eorpach agus an tSeirbia maidir leis na prionsabail ghinearálta i dtaca le rannpháirtíocht na Seirbia i gCláir Chomhphobail.
 (3) Rialachán (AE) 2021/695 ó Pharlaimint na hEorpa agus ón gComhairle an 28 Aibreán 2021 lena mbunaítear Fís Eorpach - an Clár Réime um Thaighde agus um Nuálaíocht, lena leagtar síos na rialacha maidir le rannpháirtíocht agus leathadh, agus lena leasaítear Rialacháin (AE) Uimh. 1290/2013 agus (AE) Uimh. 1291/2013, IO L 170, 12.5.2021, lch. 1.
 (4) Cinneadh (AE) 2021/764 ón gComhairle an 10 Bealtaine 2021 lena mbunaítear an Clár Sonrach lena gcuirtear chun feidhme Fís Eorpach - an Clár Réime um Thaighde agus um Nuálaíocht, agus lena n-aisghairtear Cinneadh 2013/743/AE (IO L 167 I, 12.5.2021, lch. 1.).
 (5) Rialachán (AE) 2021/819 ó Pharlaimint na hEorpa agus ón gComhairle an 20 Bealtaine 2021 maidir leis an Institiúid Eorpach um Nuálaíocht agus Teicneolaíocht (athmhúnlú) (IO L 189, 28.5.2021, lch. 61.).
 (6) Cinneadh (AE) 2021/820 ó Pharlaimint na hEorpa agus ón gComhairle an 20 Bealtaine 2021 maidir le Clár Oibre Straitéiseach um Nuálaíocht na hInstitiúide Eorpaí um Nuálaíocht agus Teicneolaíocht (EIT) 2021-2027: Borradh a chur faoi Thallann Nuálaíochta agus faoi Chumas Nuálaíochta na hEorpa agus lena n-aisghairtear Cinneadh Uimh. 1312/2013/AE (IO L 189, 28.5.2021, lch. 91.).
 (7) Glactar bearta sriantacha an Aontais Eorpaigh de bhun Airteagal 29 den Chonradh ar an Aontas Eorpach nó de bhun Airteagal 215 den Chonradh ar Fheidhmiú an Aontais Eorpaigh.
 (8) Rialachán (CE) Uimh. 723/2009 ón gComhairle an 25 Meitheamh 2009 maidir le Creat dlíthiúil an Chomhphobail maidir le Cuibhreannas don Bhonneagar Taighde Eorpach (ERIC) (IO L 206, 8.8.2009, lch. 1.).
 (9) Rialachán (AE, Euratom) 2018/1046 ó Pharlaimint na hEorpa agus ón gComhairle an 18 Iúil 2018 maidir leis na rialacha airgeadais is infheidhme maidir le buiséad ginearálta an Aontais, lena leasaítear Rialacháin (AE) Uimh. 1296/2013, (AE) Uimh. 1301/2013, (AE) Uimh. 1303/2013, (AE) Uimh. 1304/2013, (AE) Uimh. 1309/2013, (AE) Uimh. 1316/2013, (AE) Uimh. 223/2014, (AE) Uimh. 283/2014, agus Cinneadh Uimh. 541/2014/AE agus lena n-aisghairtear Rialachán (AE, Euratom) Uimh. 966/2012 (IO L 193, 30.7.2018, lch. 1).
 (10) Áirítear leis seo go háirithe na hacmhainní ó Ionstraim Théarnaimh an Aontais Eorpaigh arna bunú le Rialachán (AE) 2020/2094 ón gComhairle an 14 Nollaig 2020 lena mbunaítear Ionstraim Théarnaimh an Aontais Eorpaigh chun tacú leis an téarnamh i ndiaidh ghéarchéim COVID-19 (IO L 433 I, 22.12.2020, lch. 23.).
 (11) IO L 433 I, 22.12.2020, lch. 23.
 IARSCRÍBHINN I
 Rialacha lena rialaítear ranníocaíocht airgeadais na Seirbia leis an gClár Fís Eorpach (2021-2027)
 I. Ranníocaíocht airgeadais na Seirbia a ríomh
 1.
 Déanfar ranníocaíocht airgeadais na Seirbia leis an gClár Fís Eorpach a bhunú ar bhonn bliantúil i gcomhréir leis an méid a bheidh ar fáil gach bliain i mbuiséad an Aontais le haghaidh leithreasuithe faoi chomhair gealltanas is gá chun an Clár Fís Eorpach a bhainistiú, a chur i bhfeidhm agus a oibriú, agus beidh an ranníocaíocht sin sa bhreis ar an méid sin, méid a mhéadófar i gcomhréir le hAirteagal 3(4) den Chomhaontú seo.
 2.
 An táille rannpháirtíochta dá dtagraítear in Airteagal 3(7) den Chomhaontú seo, déanfar í a chéimniú isteach mar a leanas:
 —
 2021: 0.5 %;
 —
 2022: 1 %;
 —
 2023: 1.5 %;
 —
 2024: 2 %;
 —
 2025: 2.5 %;
 —
 2026: 3 %;
 —
 2027: 4 %.
 3.
 I gcomhréir le hAirteagal 3(5) den Chomhaontú seo, déanfar an ranníocaíocht oibríochtúil tosaigh atá le híoc ag an tSeirbia maidir lena rannpháirtíocht sa Chlár Fís Eorpach a ríomh le haghaidh na mblianta airgeadais faoi seach trí choigeartú a chur i bhfeidhm ar an treoir ranníoca.
 Is éard a bheidh sa choigeartú ar an treoir ranníoca:
 An Treoir Ranníoca arna Choigeartú = An Treoir Ranníoca × Chomhéifeacht
 Is 0,45 a bheidh sa chomhéifeacht a úsáidfear sa ríomh thuasluaite chun an treoir ranníoca a choigeartú.
 4.
 I gcomhréir le hAirteagal 3(8) den Chomhaontú seo, sa bhliain N+1 a dhéanfar an chéad choigeartú a bhaineann le cur chun feidhme an bhuiséid le haghaidh bhliain N nuair a choigeartófar ranníocaíocht oibríochtúil tosaigh bhliain N suas nó síos de réir na difríochta idir:
 a)
 ranníocaíocht choigeartaithe arna ríomh tríd an treoir ranníoca a choigeartófar le haghaidh bhliain N a chur i bhfeidhm maidir le suim:
 i.
 mhéid na ngealltanas buiséadach a rinneadh maidir le leithreasuithe faoi chomhair gealltanas a údaraíodh le haghaidh bhliain N faoi bhuiséad an Aontais Eorpaigh ar vótáladh ina fhabhar agus maidir le leithreasuithe faoi chomhair gealltanas a chomhfhreagraíonn do ghealltanais saortha a chuirtear ar fáil arís; agus
 ii.
 aon leithreasú faoi chomhair gealltanas atá bunaithe ar ioncam sannta seachtrach nach dtagann as ranníocaíochtaí airgeadais leis an gClár Fís Eorpach ó dheontóirí eile agus a bhí ar fáil ag deireadh bhliain N (1). I gcás ioncam sannta seachtrach a shanntar d’Fhís Eorpach faoi Airteagal 3(1) de Rialachán (AE) 2020/2094 ón gComhairle lena mbunaítear Ionstraim Théarnaimh de chuid an Aontais Eorpaigh chun tacú leis an téarnamh i ndiaidh ghéarchéim COVID-19 (2), úsáidfear na méideanna táscacha ilbhliantúla i gclársceidealú CAI chun an ranníocaíocht choigeartaithe a ríomh.
 b)
 agus ranníocaíocht oibríochtúil tosaigh bhliain N.
 Ag tosú i mbliain N+2, agus gach bliain ina dhiaidh sin, go dtí go mbeidh na gealltanais bhuiséadacha uile a mhaoinítear faoi leithreasaithe faoi chomhair gealltanas a thionscnaítear ó bhliain N, arna méadú i gcomhréir le hAirteagal 3(4) den chomhaontú seo, íoctha nó saortha, agus 3 bliana ar a dhéanaí tar éis dheireadh an Chláir Fís Eorpach, ríomhfaidh an tAontas coigeartú ar ranníocaíocht oibríochtúil bhliain N trí ranníocaíocht oibríochtúil na Seirbia a laghdú faoin méid a fuarthas tríd an treoir ranníoca, arna coigeartú le haghaidh bhliain N, a chur i bhfeidhm maidir leis na gealltanais saortha a rinneadh gach bliain maidir le gealltanais bhliain N a mhaoinítear faoi bhuiséad an Aontais nó ó ghealltanais saortha a chuirtear ar fáil arís.
 I gcás ina gcuirfear ar ceal na méideanna a eascraíonn as ioncam sannta seachtrach bhliain N (chun leithreasuithe faoi chomhair gealltanas, agus, i gcás méideanna faoi Rialachán (AE) 2020/2094 ón gComhairle, na méideanna táscacha ilbhliantúla i gclársceidealú CAI, a áireamh) nach dtagann as ranníocaíochtaí airgeadais leis an gClár Fís Eorpach ó dheontóirí eile, déanfar ranníocaíocht oibríochtúil na Seirbia a laghdú faoin méid a fuarthas tríd an treoir ranníoca, arna coigeartú le haghaidh bhliain N, a chur i bhfeidhm maidir leis an méid a cuireadh ar ceal.
 II. Ranníocaíocht oibríochtúil na Seirbia a cheartú go huathoibríoch
 1.
 Chun an ceartúchán uathoibríoch dá dtagraítear in Airteagal 4 den Chomhaontú seo a ríomh, beidh feidhm ag na módúlachtaí seo a leanas:
 a)
 ciallaíonn “deontais iomaíocha” deontais a dhámhtar trí ghlaonna ar thograí inar féidir na tairbhithe deiridh a shainaithint tráth a ríomhtar an ceartúchán uathoibríoch. Eisiatar tacaíocht airgeadais do thríú páirtithe mar a shainmhínítear in Airteagal 204 den Rialachán Airgeadais;
 b)
 i gcás ina síneofar gealltanas dlíthiúil le cuibhreannas, is iad na méideanna carnacha a leithdháiltear ar thairbhithe is eintitis de chuid na Seirbia na méideanna a úsáidfear chun méideanna tosaigh an ghealltanais dhlíthiúil a bhunú i gcomhréir le miondealú táscach buiséid an chomhaontaithe deontais;
 c)
 bunófar méideanna uile na ngealltanas dlíthiúil a chomhfhreagraíonn do dheontais iomaíocha trí úsáid a bhaint as córas leictreonach an Choimisiúin Eorpaigh, eCorda, agus asbhainfear iad ar an dara Céadaoin i mí Feabhra na bliana N+2;
 d)
 ciallaíonn “costais neamh-idirghabhálacha” costais an Chláir seachas deontais iomaíocha, lena n-áirítear caiteachas tacaíochta, riarachán clárshonrach, gníomhaíochtaí eile (3);
 e)
 measfar gur costais neamh-idirghabhálacha iad na méideanna a leithdháiltear ar eagraíochtaí idirnáisiúnta mar eintitis dhlítheanacha arb iad an tairbhí deiridh (4) iad.
 2.
 Cuirfear an sásra i bhfeidhm mar a leanas:
 a)
 Ceartúcháin uathoibríocha le haghaidh bhliain N i ndáil le forghníomhú leithreasuithe faoi chomhair gealltanas i leith bhliain N, arna méadú i gcomhréir le hAirteagal 3(4) den Chomhaontú seo, cuirfear i bhfeidhm iad bunaithe ar shonraí bhliain N agus ar shonraí bhliain N+1 ó eCorda dá dtagraítear i bpointe (c) de mhír (1) de phointe (II) den Iarscríbhinn seo i mbliain N+2 tar éis aon choigeartú i gcomhréir le hAirteagal 3(8) den Chomhaontú seo a chur i bhfeidhm maidir le ranníocaíocht na Seirbia leis an gClár Fís Eorpach. Is é an méid a bhreithneofar méid na ndeontas iomaíoch a bhfuil sonraí ar fáil ina leith, tráth a ríomhtar an ceartúchán.
 b)
 Ag tosú i mbliain N+2 agus suas go dtí 2029, déanfar méid an cheartúcháin uathoibríoch a ríomh le haghaidh bhliain N tríd an difríocht idir na nithe seo a leanas a ghlacadh:
 i.
 méid iomlán na ndeontas iomaíoch arna gcionroinnt ar an tSeirbia nó ar eintitis dhlítheanacha na Seirbia mar ghealltanais arna ndéanamh maidir le leithreasuithe buiséid le haghaidh bhliain N; agus
 ii.
 méid ranníocaíocht oibríochtúil choigeartaithe na Seirbia le haghaidh bhliain N arna iolrú faoin gcóimheas idir:
 A.
 méid na ndeontas iomaíoch arna dtabhairt ar leithreasuithe faoi chomhair gealltanas do bhliain N, arna méadú i gcomhréir le hAirteagal 3(4) den Chomhaontú seo; agus
 B.
 iomlán na leithreasuithe buiséadacha údaraithe faoi chomhair gealltanas le haghaidh bhliain N, lena n-áirítear costais neamh-idirghabhálacha.
 III. Íocaíocht ranníocaíocht airgeadais na Seirbia, íocaíocht na gcoigeartuithe a rinneadh ar ranníocaíocht oibríochtúil na Seirbia, agus íocaíocht an cheartúcháin uathoibríoch is infheidhme maidir le ranníocaíocht oibríochtúil na Seirbia
 1.
 Cuirfidh an Coimisiún an fhaisnéis seo a leanas in iúl don tSeirbia a luaithe is féidir agus tráth nach déanaí ná tráth eisiúna an chéad ghlao ar chistí na bliana airgeadais:
 a.
 na méideanna i leithreasuithe faoi chomhair gealltanas i mbuiséad an Aontais arna nglacadh go críochnaitheach le haghaidh na bliana i gceist do na línte buiséid lena gcumhdaítear rannpháirtíocht na Seirbia sa Chlár Fís Eorpach, méideanna a mhéadófar, más ábhartha, i gcomhréir le hAirteagal 3(4) den Chomhaontú seo;
 b.
 méid na táille rannpháirtíochta dá dtagraítear in Airteagal 3(7) den Chomhaontú seo;
 c.
 ó bhliain N+1 de chur chun feidhme an Chláir Fís Eorpach, cur chun feidhme leithreasuithe faoi chomhair gealltanas a chomhfhreagraíonn do bhliain bhuiséadach N, leithreasuithe a mhéadófar i gcomhréir le hAirteagal 3(4) den Chomhaontú seo, agus leibhéal na ngealltanas saortha;
 d.
 maidir leis an gcuid den Chlár Fís Eorpach ina bhfuil gá leis an bhfaisnéis sin chun an ceartúchán uathoibríoch, leibhéal na ngealltanas a tugadh i bhfabhar eintitis dhlítheanacha na Seirbia arna miondealú de réir bhliain chomhfhreagrach na leithreasuithe buiséadacha agus leibhéal iomlán gaolmhar na ngealltanas a ríomh.
 Ar bhonn a Dhréachtbhuiséid, soláthróidh an Coimisiún meastachán ar fhaisnéis le haghaidh na bliana dár gcionn faoi phointe (a) agus pointe (b) a luaithe is féidir, agus, faoin 1 Meán Fómhair den bhliain airgeadais ar a dhéanaí.
 2.
 I mí Aibreáin agus i mí an Mheithimh gach bliain airgeadais ar a dhéanaí, eiseoidh an Coimisiún glao ar chistí chuig an tSeirbia a chomhfhreagraíonn dá ranníocaíocht faoin gComhaontú seo.
 Le gach glao ar chistí, déanfar foráil maidir le híocaíocht sé dhódhéagú de ranníocaíocht na Seirbia tráth nach déanaí ná 30 lá tar éis eisiúint an ghlao ar chistí.
 I gcás na chéad bhliana de chur chun feidhme an Chomhaontaithe seo, eiseoidh an Coimisiún aon ghlao amháin ar chistí laistigh de 60 lá tar éis an dáta ar a dtosóidh éifeachtaí dlíthiúla ag gabháil leis an gComhaontú seo.
 3.
 Gach bliain ó 2023 amach, léireofar sna glaonna ar chistí méid an cheartúcháin uathoibríoch is infheidhme maidir leis an ranníocaíocht oibríochtúil a íocfar le haghaidh bhliain N-2.
 Féadfar a áireamh freisin sa ghlao ar chistí a eiseofar i mí Aibreáin ar a dhéanaí, coigeartuithe ar an ranníocaíocht airgeadais a íocfaidh an tSeirbia as cur chun feidhme, bainistiú agus oibriú an Chláir nó na gClár Réime um Thaighde agus um Nuálaíocht a bhí ann roimhe ar ghlac an tSeirbia páirt iontu.
 I gcás gach ceann de na blianta airgeadais 2028, 2029 agus 2030, an méid a eascraíonn as an gceartúchán uathoibríoch a chur i bhfeidhm maidir leis na ranníocaíochtaí oibríochtúla a íocfaidh an tSeirbia sa bhliain 2026 agus sa bhliain 2027, nó an méid a eascraíonn as na coigeartuithe a dhéanfar i gcomhréir le hAirteagal 3(8) den Chomhaontú seo, beidh sé dlite don tSeirbia nó dlite uaidh
 4.
 Íocfaidh an tSeirbia a ranníocaíocht airgeadais faoin gComhaontú seo i gcomhréir le pointe III den Iarscríbhinn seo. In éagmais íocaíocht na Seirbia faoin dáta dlite, seolfaidh an Coimisiún litir mheabhrúcháin fhoirmiúil.
 Is é an toradh a bheidh ar aon mhoill ar íocaíocht na ranníocaíochta go n-íocfaidh an tSeirbia ús mainneachtana ar an méid atá gan íoc ón dáta dlite.
 Is é an ráta úis ar mhéideanna is infhaighte nach n-íoctar ar an dáta dlite an ráta arna chur i bhfeidhm ag an mBanc Ceannais Eorpach ar a phríomhoibríochtaí athmhaoinithe, arna fhoilsiú i sraith C d’Iris Oifigiúil an Aontais Eorpaigh, a bheidh i bhfeidhm ar an gcéad lá féilire den mhí ina mbeidh an dáta dlite, agus é sin méadaithe faoi aon phointe céatadáin go leith.
 (1) Áirítear leis seo go háirithe na hacmhainní ó Ionstraim Théarnaimh an Aontais Eorpaigh arna bunú le Rialachán (AE) 2020/2094 ón gComhairle an 14 Nollaig 2020 lena mbunaítear Ionstraim Théarnaimh an Aontais Eorpaigh chun tacú leis an téarnamh i ndiaidh ghéarchéim COVID-19 (IO L 433 I, 22.12.2020, lch. 23.).
 (2) IO L 433 I, 22.12.2020, lch. 23.
 (3) I measc na ngníomhaíochtaí eile, go háirithe, tá soláthar, duaiseanna, ionstraimí airgeadais, gníomhaíochtaí díreacha an Airmheáin Chomhpháirtigh Taighde, Síntiúis (an Eagraíocht um Chomhar agus Forbairt Eacnamaíochta, Eureka, an Chomhpháirtíocht Idirnáisiúnta um Chomhar in Éifeachtúlacht Fuinnimh, an Ghníomhaireacht Idirnáisiúnta Fuinnimh, ...), saineolaithe (meastóirí, faireachán ar thionscadail) etc.
 (4) Ní mheasfar gur costais neamh-idirghabhálacha iad eagraíochtaí idirnáisiúnta ach amháin más tairbhithe deiridh iad. Ní bheidh feidhm aige sin i gcás inar comhordaitheoir ar thionscadal í an eagraíocht idirnáisiúnta (agus cistí á ndáileadh ar chomhordaitheoirí eile).
 IARSCRÍBHINN II
 Liosta neamh-uileghabhálach de chláir agus de ghníomhartha coibhéiseacha na Seirbia
 Is mar chláir agus gníomhartha na Seirbia atá coibhéiseach leis an gClár Fís Eorpach a mheasfar an liosta neamh-uileghabhálach seo a leanas:
 cláir agus gníomhartha taighde agus forbartha agus nuálaíochta á bhfoilsiú ag:
 —
 An Aireacht Oideachais, Eolaíochta agus Forbartha Teicneolaíche;
 —
 Ciste Nuálaíochta na Seirbia;
 —
 Ciste Eolaíochta Phoblacht na Seirbia;
 —
 An Aireacht Geilleagair;
 —
 An Aireacht Talmhaíochta, Foraoiseachta agus Bainistíochta Uisce;
 —
 An Aireacht um Chosaint Comhshaoil.
 IARSCRÍBHINN III
 Bainistíocht Fhónta Airgeadais
 Leasanna airgeadais a chosaint agus a aisghabháil
 Airteagal 1
 Athbhreithnithe agus iniúchtaí
 1. Beidh sé de cheart ag an Aontas Eorpach, i gcomhréir leis na gníomhartha is infheidhme ó cheann amháin nó níos mó d’institiúidí nó comhlachtaí an Aontais agus mar a fhoráiltear i gcomhaontuithe agus/nó i gconarthaí ábhartha, athbhreithnithe agus iniúchtaí teicniúla, eolaíocha, airgeadais, nó cineálacha eile athbhreithnithe agus iniúchtaí, a dhéanamh ar áitreabh aon duine nádúrtha a bhfuil cónaí air sa tSeirbia nó ar áitreabh aon eintitis dhlítheanaigh atá bunaithe sa tSeirbia agus a fhaigheann cistiú ón Aontas Eorpach, chomh maith le haon tríú páirtí atá rannpháirteach i gcur chun feidhme chistí an Aontais atá ina chónaí nó bunaithe sa tSeirbia. Féadfaidh gníomhairí institiúidí agus chomhlachtaí an Aontais Eorpaigh, go háirithe gníomhairí an Choimisiúin Eorpaigh agus Chúirt Iniúchóirí na hEorpa na hathbhreithnithe agus na hiniúchtaí sin a dhéanamh, nó féadfaidh daoine eile, ar thug an Coimisiún Eorpach sainordú dóibh, iad a dhéanamh.
 2. Beidh rochtain iomchuí ag gníomhairí institiúidí agus chomhlachtaí an Aontais, go háirithe gníomhairí an Choimisiúin Eorpaigh agus Chúirt Iniúchóirí na hEorpa, agus na daoine eile ar thug an Coimisiún Eorpach sainordú dóibh, ar láithreáin, oibreacha agus doiciméid (idir leaganacha leictreonacha agus leaganacha páipéir) agus ar an bhfaisnéis uile is gá chun na hiniúchtaí sin a dhéanamh, lena n-áirítear an ceart chun cóip fhisiceach/leictreonach d’aon doiciméad nó d’ábhar aon mheáin sonraí, agus sleachta ó na doiciméid sin, atá ag an duine nádúrtha nó dlítheanach atá faoi iniúchadh nó ag an tríú páirtí atá faoi iniúchadh.
 3. Ní chuirfidh an tSeirbia cosc ná aon bhac ar leith ar an gceart iontrála sa tSeirbia ná ar rochtain ar áitreabh na ngníomhairí agus na ndaoine eile dá dtagraítear i mír 2 ar fhorais fheidhmiú a ndualgas dá dtagraítear san Airteagal seo.
 4. Féadfar na hathbhreithnithe agus na hiniúchtaí a dhéanamh freisin, tar éis chur i bhfeidhm an Chomhaontaithe seo a chur ar fionraí, de bhun Airteagal 9(5) de, tar éis scor an chur i bhfeidhm shealadaigh nó tar éis fhoirceannadh an Chomhaontaithe seo, ar bhonn na dtéarmaí a leagtar síos sna gníomhartha is infheidhme ó cheann amháin nó níos mó d’institiúidí nó comhlachtaí an Aontais agus dá bhforáiltear i gcomhaontuithe agus/nó i gconarthaí ábhartha i ndáil le haon ghealltanas dlíthiúil lena gcuirtear chun feidhme buiséad an Aontais Eorpaigh ar gealltanas é a bheidh déanta ag an Aontas Eorpach roimh an dáta óna ngabhfaidh éifeacht le fionraí chur i bhfeidhm an Chomhaontaithe seo de bhun Airteagal 9(5) ann, le scor an chur i bhfeidhm shealadaigh nó le foirceannadh an Chomhaontaithe seo.
 Airteagal 2
 An comhrac i gcoinne neamhrialtachtaí, calaoise agus cionta coiriúla eile a dhéanann difear do leasanna airgeadais an Aontais
 1. Údarófar don Choimisiún Eorpach agus don Oifig Eorpach Frith-Chalaoise (OLAF) imscrúduithe riaracháin a dhéanamh i gcríoch na Seirbia, lena n-áirítear seiceálacha agus cigireachtaí ar an láthair. Déanfar na himscrúduithe sin i gcomhréir leis na téarmaí agus na coinníollacha arna mbunú leis na gníomhartha is infheidhme ó cheann amháin nó níos mó d’institiúidí an Aontais.
 2. Cuirfidh údaráis inniúla na Seirbia an Coimisiún Eorpach nó OLAF ar an eolas laistigh de thréimhse réasúnach ama faoi aon fhíoras nó amhras atá tugtha faoi deara acu i ndáil le neamhrialtacht, calaois nó gníomhaíocht neamhdhleathach eile lena ndéantar difear do leasanna airgeadais an Aontais.
 3. Féadfar seiceálacha agus cigireachtaí ar an láthair a dhéanamh ar áitreabh aon duine nádúrtha a bhfuil cónaí air sa tSeirbia nó ar áitreabh aon eintitis dhlítheanaigh atá bunaithe sa tSeirbia agus a fhaigheann cistí ón Aontas, chomh maith le haon tríú páirtí atá rannpháirteach i gcur chun feidhme chistí an Aontais atá ina chónaí nó bunaithe sa tSeirbia.
 4. Is é an Coimisiún Eorpach nó OLAF, i ndlúthchomhar le húdarás inniúil na Seirbia arna ainmniú ag rialtas na Seirbia, a ullmhóidh agus a thabharfaidh i gcrích na seiceálacha agus na cigireachtaí ar an láthair. Tabharfar fógra, tréimhse réasúnach ama roimh ré, don údarás ainmnithe faoi aidhm, cuspóir agus bunús dlí na seiceálacha agus na gcigireachtaí, ionas go mbeidh sé in ann cúnamh a thabhairt. Chuige sin, féadfaidh oifigigh údaráis inniúla na Seirbia páirt a ghlacadh sna seiceálacha agus sna cigireachtaí ar an láthair.
 5. Arna iarraidh sin d’údaráis na Seirbia, féadfar na seiceálacha agus na cigireachtaí ar an láthair a dhéanamh go comhpháirteach leis an gCoimisiún Eorpach nó le OLAF.
 6. Beidh rochtain ag gníomhairí an Choimisiúin agus ag baill foirne OLAF ar an bhfaisnéis agus ar an doiciméadacht uile, lena n-áirítear sonraí ríomhaireachta, maidir leis na hoibríochtaí lena mbaineann, atá riachtanach chun na seiceálacha agus na cigireachtaí ar an láthair a dhéanamh mar is cuí. Féadfaidh siad, go háirithe, doiciméid ábhartha a chóipeáil.
 7. I gcás ina gcuireann duine, eintiteas nó tríú páirtí eile i gcoinne seiceáil nó cigireacht ar an láthair, tabharfaidh údaráis na Seirbia cúnamh, ag gníomhú dóibh i gcomhréir le rialacha agus rialacháin náisiúnta, don Choimisiún Eorpach nó do OLAF, ionas gur féidir leo a ndualgas a chomhlíonadh maidir le seiceáil nó cigireacht ar an láthair a dhéanamh. Áireofar leis an gcúnamh sin na bearta réamhchúraim iomchuí a dhéanamh faoin dlí náisiúnta, go háirithe chun fianaise a chosaint.
 8. Cuirfidh an Coimisiún Eorpach nó OLAF údaráis inniúla na Seirbia ar an eolas faoi thoradh na seiceálacha agus na gcigireachtaí sin. Tuairisceoidh an Coimisiún Eorpach nó OLAF, go háirithe, a luaithe is féidir d’údarás inniúil na Seirbia maidir le haon fhíoras nó aon amhras a bhaineann le neamhrialtacht atá tugtha faoi deara acu le linn na seiceála nó na cigireachta ar an láthair.
 9. Gan dochar do chur i bhfeidhm dhlí coiriúil na Seirbia, féadfaidh an Coimisiún Eorpach bearta agus pionóis riaracháin a fhorchur ar dhaoine dlítheanacha nó ar dhaoine nádúrtha de chuid na Seirbia a ghlacann páirt i gcur chun feidhme cláir nó gníomhaíochta i gcomhréir le reachtaíocht an Aontais Eorpaigh.
 10. Chun críocha chur chun feidhme cuí an Airteagail seo, déanfaidh an Coimisiún Eorpach nó OLAF agus údaráis inniúla na Seirbia faisnéis a mhalartú go rialta agus, arna iarraidh sin do cheann de na páirtithe sa Chomhaontú seo, rachaidh siad i gcomhairle le chéile.
 11. Chun comhar agus malartú faisnéise éifeachtach le OLAF a éascú, is í Seirbhís Comhordúcháin Frith-Chalaoise (AFCOS) na Seirbia a bheidh mar phointe teagmhála ainmnithe don tSeirbia.
 12. An malartú faisnéise a dhéanfar idir an Coimisiún Eorpach nó OLAF agus údaráis inniúla na Seirbia, déanfar é agus aird chuí á tabhairt ar na ceanglais rúndachta. Na sonraí pearsanta a áireofar sa mhalartú faisnéise, cosnófar iad i gcomhréir leis na rialacha is infheidhme.
 13. Oibreoidh údaráis na Seirbia i gcomhar le hOifig an Ionchúisitheora Phoiblí Eorpaigh ionas go mbeidh siad in ann a ndualgas a chomhlíonadh maidir le déantóirí cionta coiriúla, agus a gcomhchoirithe, i gcionta coiriúla a dhéanann difear do leasanna airgeadais an Aontais Eorpaigh, a imscrúdú, a ionchúiseamh agus a thabhairt chun breithiúnais i gcomhréir leis an reachtaíocht is infheidhme.
 Airteagal 3
 Aisghabháil agus forfheidhmiú
 1. Cinntí arna nglacadh ag an gCoimisiún Eorpach lena bhforchuirtear oibleagáid airgid ar dhaoine dlítheanacha nó nádúrtha seachas Stáit i ndáil le haon éileamh a eascraíonn as an gClár Fís Eorpach, beidh siad in-fhorfheidhmithe sa tSeirbia. Beidh an t-ordú maidir lena fhorfheidhmiú i gceangal leis an gcinneadh, gan aon fhoirmiúlacht eile seachas fíorú ar bharántúlacht an chinnidh ag an údarás náisiúnta arna ainmniú chun na críche sin ag an tSeirbia. Cuirfidh rialtas na Seirbia a údarás náisiúnta ainmnithe in iúl don Choimisiún agus do Chúirt Bhreithiúnais an Aontais Eorpaigh. I gcomhréir le hAirteagal 4, beidh an Coimisiún Eorpach i dteideal fógra maidir le cinntí in-fhorfheidhmithe den sórt sin a thabhairt go díreach do dhaoine a bhfuil cónaí orthu sa tSeirbia agus d’eintitis dhlítheanacha atá bunaithe sa tSeirbia. Déanfar an forfheidhmiú i gcomhréir le dlí agus rialacha nós imeachta na Seirbia.
 2. I gcás breithiúnais agus orduithe ó Chúirt Bhreithiúnais an Aontais Eorpaigh a thugtar i gcur i bhfeidhm clásail eadrána atá i gconradh nó i gcomhaontú i ndáil le cláir, gníomhaíochtaí, gníomhartha nó tionscadail an Aontais, beidh siad in-fhorfheidhmithe sa tSeirbia ar an gcaoi chéanna le cinntí ón gCoimisiún Eorpach dá dtagraítear i mír (1).
 3. Beidh dlínse ag Cúirt Bhreithiúnais an Aontais Eorpaigh chun athbhreithniú a dhéanamh ar dhlíthiúlacht an chinnidh ón gCoimisiún dá dtagraítear i mír 1 agus forfheidhmiú an chinnidh sin a chur ar fionraí. Beidh dlínse ag Cúirteanna na Seirbia, áfach, ar ghearáin á rá go bhfuil an forfheidhmiú á dhéanamh ar bhealach neamhrialta.
 Airteagal 4
 Cumarsáid agus malartú faisnéise
 Institiúidí agus comhlachtaí an Aontais Eorpaigh atá rannpháirteach i gcur chun feidhme an Chláir Fís Eorpach, nó i rialú an chláir sin, beidh siad i dteideal cumarsáid a dhéanamh go díreach, lena n-áirítear trí chórais malartaithe leictreonaigh, le haon duine nádúrtha a bhfuil cónaí air sa tSeirbia nó le haon eintiteas dlítheanach atá bunaithe inti agus a fhaigheann cistí ón Aontas, chomh maith le haon tríú páirtí atá rannpháirteach i gcur chun feidhme chistí an Aontais agus a bhfuil cónaí air sa tSeirbia nó atá bunaithe inti. Féadfaidh na daoine, na heintitis agus na páirtithe sin an fhaisnéis agus an doiciméadacht ábhartha uile a chur go díreach faoi bhráid institiúidí agus chomhlachtaí an Aontais Eorpaigh, ar faisnéis agus doiciméadacht iad a cheanglaítear orthu a chur isteach ar bhonn reachtaíocht an Aontais Eorpaigh is infheidhme maidir le clár an Aontais agus ar bhonn na gconarthaí nó na gcomhaontuithe arna dtabhairt i gcrích chun an clár sin a chur chun feidhme.


type: legislation

text:
 30.11.2021
 SK
 Úradný vestník Európskej únie
 L 427/166
 VYKONÁVACIE NARIADENIE KOMISIE (EÚ) 2021/2092
 z 29. novembra 2021
 o povolení dvojmravčana draselného ako kŕmnej doplnkovej látky pre ošípané vo výkrme a odstavené prasiatka
 (Text s významom pre EHP)
 EURÓPSKA KOMISIA,
 so zreteľom na Zmluvu o fungovaní Európskej únie,
 so zreteľom na nariadenie Európskeho parlamentu a Rady (ES) č. 1831/2003 z 22. septembra 2003 o doplnkových látkach určených na používanie vo výžive zvierat (1), a najmä na jeho článok 9 ods. 2,
 keďže:
 (1)
 V nariadení (ES) č. 1831/2003 sa stanovuje povoľovanie doplnkových látok určených na používanie vo výžive zvierat, ako aj dôvody a postupy udeľovania takýchto povolení.
 (2)
 V súlade s článkom 7 nariadenia (ES) č. 1831/2003 bola predložená žiadosť o povolenie dvojmravčana draselného. K žiadosti boli priložené údaje a doklady vyžadované podľa článku 7 ods. 3 nariadenia (ES) č. 1831/2003.
 (3)
 Žiadosť sa týka povolenia látky dvojmravčan draselný ako kŕmnej doplnkovej látky pre ošípané vo výkrme a odstavené prasiatka, ktorá sa má zaradiť do kategórie doplnkových látok „technologické doplnkové látky“.
 (4)
 Európsky úrad pre bezpečnosť potravín (ďalej len „úrad“) v stanovisku z 5. mája 2021 (2) skonštatoval, že dvojmravčan draselný nemá za navrhovaných podmienok používania negatívny účinok na zdravie zvierat, bezpečnosť spotrebiteľov ani životné prostredie. Takisto dospel k záveru, že látka nevyvoláva obavy, pokiaľ ide o účinky na dýchaciu sústavu a pokožku, ale je dráždivá pre oči. Komisia sa preto domnieva, že by sa mali prijať primerané ochranné opatrenia s cieľom zabrániť nepriaznivým účinkom na zdravie ľudí, najmä pokiaľ ide o používateľov doplnkovej látky. Úrad takisto dospel k záveru, že látka môže byť účinná ako technologická doplnková látka v krmivách. Zároveň overil správu o metódach analýzy kŕmnych doplnkových látok v krmive predloženú referenčným laboratóriom zriadeným nariadením (ES) č. 1831/2003.
 (5)
 Z posúdenia dvojmravčana draselného vyplýva, že podmienky povolenia stanovené v článku 5 nariadenia (ES) č. 1831/2003 boli splnené. Používanie uvedenej látky by sa preto malo povoliť podľa prílohy k tomuto nariadeniu.
 (6)
 Opatrenia stanovené v tomto nariadení sú v súlade so stanoviskom Stáleho výboru pre rastliny, zvieratá, potraviny a krmivá,
 PRIJALA TOTO NARIADENIE:
 Článok 1
 Látka špecifikovaná v prílohe, ktorá patrí do kategórie doplnkových látok „technologické doplnkové látky“ a do funkčnej skupiny „regulátory kyslosti“, sa za podmienok stanovených v uvedenej prílohe povoľuje ako doplnková látka vo výžive zvierat.
 Článok 2
 Toto nariadenie nadobúda účinnosť dvadsiatym dňom po jeho uverejnení v Úradnom vestníku Európskej únie.
 Toto nariadenie je záväzné v celom rozsahu a priamo uplatniteľné vo všetkých členských štátoch.
 V Bruseli 29. novembra 2021
 Za Komisiu
 predsedníčka
 Ursula VON DER LEYEN
 (1) Ú. v. EÚ L 268, 18.10.2003, s. 29.
 (2) Vestník EFSA (EFSA Journal) (2021) 19(5):6617.
 PRÍLOHA
 Identifikačné číslo doplnkovej látky
 Doplnková látka
 Zloženie, chemický vzorec, opis, analytická metóda
 Druh alebo kategória zvierat
 Maximálny vek
 Minimálny obsah
 Maximálny obsah
 Iné ustanovenia
 Koniec platnosti povolenia
 mg/kg kompletného krmiva s vlhkosťou 12 %
 Kategória technologických doplnkových látok
 Funkčná skupina: regulátory kyslosti
 1j001
 dvojmravčan draselný
 Zloženie doplnkovej látky
 dvojmravčan draselný 98 %
 ošípané vo výkrme
 odstavené prasiatka
 –
 –
 6 000
 1.
 V návode na použitie doplnkovej látky a premixov sa musia uvádzať podmienky skladovania.
 2.
 Maximálny obsah dvojmravčana draselného je 6 000 mg/kg kompletného krmiva s obsahom vlhkosti 12 %, či už sa používa samostatne ako regulátor kyslosti alebo sa používa v kombinácii s inými zdrojmi dvojmravčanu draselného.
 3.
 Pre používateľov doplnkovej látky a premixov stanovia prevádzkovatelia krmivárskych podnikov prevádzkové postupy a organizačné opatrenia s cieľom riešiť potenciálne riziká súvisiace s ich používaním. Ak uvedené riziká nemožno takýmito postupmi a opatreniami odstrániť alebo znížiť na minimum, doplnková látka a premixy sa musia používať s osobnými ochrannými prostriedkami vrátane ochranných okuliarov.
 20. december 2031
 Charakteristika účinnej látky
 dvojmravčan draselný
 CAS č.: 20642-05-1
 č. Einecs 243-934-6
 C2H3O4K
 Analytická metóda
 (1)
 Na stanovenie dvojmravčanu draselného (ako celkovej kyseliny mravčej) v kŕmnej doplnkovej látke, premixe, krmivách:
 —
 iónová chromatografia s detekciou elektrickej vodivosti (IC-CD) – EN 17294;
 Na stanovenie draslíka v kŕmnej doplnkovej látke:
 —
 atómová absorpčná spektrometria (AAS) – EN ISO 6869 alebo
 —
 atómová emisná spektrometria s indukčne viazanou plazmou (ICP-AES) – EN15510.
 (1) Podrobné informácie o analytických metódach sú k dispozícii na tejto adrese referenčného laboratória: https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en/eurl/feed-additives/evaluation-reports.


type: caselaw

text:
 27.3.2010
 CS
 Úřední věstník Evropské unie
 C 80/25
 Usnesení soudce příslušného pro rozhodování o předběžných opatřeních ze dne 5. února 2010 — De Post v. Komise
 (Věc T-514/09 R)
 („Předběžné opatření - Veřejné zakázky - Nabídkové řízení Společenství - Návrh na odklad provádění a předběžné opatření - Nedostatek naléhavosti“)
 2010/C 80/45
 Jednací jazyk: angličtina
 Účastnice řízení
 Žalobkyně: De Post NV van publiek recht (Brusel, Belgie) (zástupci: R. Martens a B. Schutyser, advokáti)
 Žalovaná: Evropská komise (zástupci: E. Manhaeve a N. Bambara, zmocněnci, ve spolupráci s P. Wytinckem, advokátem)
 Předmět věci
 Návrh týkající se zaprvé odkladu provádění rozhodnutí, kterým Úřad pro publikace Evropské unie přidělil zakázku uvedenou ve výzvě k podávání nabídek číslo 10234 „Každodenní přeprava a distribuci Úředního věstníku, tiskovin, dalších periodik a publikací“ společnosti „Enterprises des Postes et Télécommunications Luxembourg“ a nikoliv žalobkyni; zadruhé, nařízení, aby nebylo přistoupeno k podpisu smlouvy uvedené ve výzvě k podávání nabídek, a zatřetí, pokud již smlouva byla uzavřena, odložení jejího provádění až do doby, kdy Tribunál rozhodne ve věci samé.
 Výrok
 1)
 Návrh na předběžné opatření se zamítá.
 2)
 O nákladech řízení bude rozhodnuto později.


type: other

text:
Databeskyttelse02.04.2020
 Efter erstatningsansvarsloven er det en betingelse for at være berettiget til en godtgørelse for tort, at der er sket en retsstridig krænkelse af ens persons frihed, fred, ære eller person. Men udgør overvågning af en politikers kreditkorttransaktioner en krænkelse, som berettiger den pågældende til tortgodtgørelse? Det skulle Højesteret tage stilling til i denne sag.
 Den konkrete sag for Højesteret udgjorde en del af et sagskompleks, der udsprang af, at en person, som havde skaffet sig adgang til en politikers kreditkorttransaktioner – mod betaling – i en periode havde videregivet transaktionsoplysninger til et ugeblad. Oplysningerne vedrørte bl.a. betaling på hoteller og i restauranter, bestilling af rejsebilletter og køb i stormagasiner. Oplysningerne var af ugebladet blevet anvendt i en artikel, hvoraf det fremgik, at politikeren havde været til stede på et bestemt diskotek i en europæisk storby.
 Derudover havde politikeren i en periode stået på en liste, som ugebladets kilde sendte til ugebladet med navne på en række offentligt kendte personer.
 Politikeren mente, at han havde været udsat for løbende og systematisk overvågning, og at denne overvågning udgjorde en alvorlig krænkelse af hans privatliv. Derfor anlagde politikeren en retssag med krav om tortgodtgørelse mod ugebladets kilde, ugebladets forhenværende chefredaktør og det udgivende forlag. Sagen blev anlagt ved byretten, men fik først sin endelige afgørelse for Højesteret.
 Grove retsstridige krænkelser – men ingen tortgodtgørelse
 Højesteret fandt, at politikeren havde været udsat for grove retsstridige krænkelser af sit privatliv i form af overvågningerne af kreditkorttransaktioner. Højesteret udtalte, at spørgsmålet herefter var, om disse krænkelser havde påført personen en tort.
 På baggrund af en fortolkning af anvendelsesområdet for erstatningsansvarslovens § 26 og en gennemgang af forarbejderne til bestemmelsen konkluderede Højesteret, at uanset, at politikeren havde været udsat for grove retsstridige krænkelser i form af overvågningen, så var krænkelserne ”efter deres karakter og omfang ikke egnet til at påvirke hans selv- og æresfølelse”.
 Højesteret stadfæstede landsrettens dom og frifandt ugebladets kilde, ugebladets forhenværende chefredaktør samt det udgivende forlag.
 at Højesterets dom understreger, at der alene kan blive tale om en tilkendelse af tort, hvis krænkelsen er egnet til at påvirke personens selv- og æresfølelse, og
 at Højesteret eksplicit i begrundelsen bemærkede, at sagen adskiller sig fra Højesterets nyligt afsagte dom om en arbejdsgivers overvågning af en medarbejder (læs nyheden om dommen her) bl.a. ved, at der i den anden sag var tale en arbejdsgivers konstante overvågning af og løbende kontrol med, at en underordnet ansat udførte sit arbejde korrekt.


text:
 27.10.2014
 MT
 Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali tal-Unjoni Ewropea
 C 380/12
 Digriet tal-Qorti Ġenerali tat-3 ta’ Settembru 2014 – Diadikasia Symvouloi Epicheiriseon vs Il-Kummissjoni
 (Kawża T-261/12) (1)
 ((“Rikors għal annullament - Kuntratti pubbliċi għal servizzi - Proċedura ta’ sejħa għal offerti - Tisħiħ tal-kapaċitajiet istituzzjonali tal-Kummissjoni għall-protezzjoni tal-kompetizzjoni fis-Serbja - Ċaħda tal-offerta ta’ offerent - Rikors manifestament infondat fid-dritt”))
 2014/C 380/15
 Lingwa tal-kawża: l-Ingliż
 Partijiet
 Rikorrenti: Diadikasia Symvouloi Epicheiriseon AE (Chalandri, il-Greċja) (rappreżentant: A. Krystallidis, avukat)
 Konvenuta: Il-Kummissjoni Ewropea (rappreżentanti: F. Erlbacher u P. van Nuffel, aġenti)
 Suġġett
 Rikors għad-danni intiż li jinkiseb kumpens għad-dannu allegatament subit mir-rikorrenti wara d-deċiżjoni tad-delegazzjoni tal-Unjoni Ewropea fir-Repubblika tas-Serbja, li tannulla d-deċiżjoni li tagħti l-kuntratt lir-rikorrenti fil-kuntest ta’ proċedura ta’ sejħa għal offerti EuropeAid/131427/C/SER/RS, li tikkonċerna t-tisħiħ tal-kapaċitajiet istituzzjonali tal-Kummissjoni għall-protezzjoni tal-kompetizzjoni fis-Serbja (ĠU 2011/S 147-243259).
 Dispożittiv
 1)
 Ir-rikors huwa miċħud
 2)
 Diadikasia Symvouloi Epicheiriseon AE hija kkundannata għall-ispejjeż.
 (1) ĠU C 243, 11.08.2012.