type: caselaw

jurisdiction: EU

text:
 25.8.2014
 DE
 Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union
 C 282/51
 Klage, eingereicht am 30. Juni 2014 — Bodegas Muga/Kommission
 (Rechtssache T-491/14)
 2014/C 282/67
 Verfahrenssprache: Spanisch
 Parteien
 Klägerin: Bodegas Muga, SL (Haro, Spanien) (Prozessbevollmächtigte: Rechtsanwälte J. L. Buendía Sierra, E. Abad Valdenebro, R. Calvo Salinero und A. Lamadrid de Pablo)
 Beklagte: Europäische Kommission
 Anträge
 Die Klägerin beantragt,
 —
 den angefochtenen Beschluss für nichtig zu erklären, soweit er verschiedene Maßnahmen, die gemäß dem Beschluss das sogenannte spanische True-Lease-Modell bilden, als eine neue und mit dem Binnenmarkt unvereinbare staatliche Beihilfe beurteilt;
 —
 hilfsweise, die Art. 1 und 4 des angefochtenen Beschlusses für nichtig zu erklären, in denen die Investoren der wirtschaftlichen Interessenvereinigungen als Empfänger der angeblichen Beihilfen und als einzige Adressaten der Rückforderungsanordnung bezeichnet werden;
 —
 hilfsweise, Art. 4 des angefochtenen Beschlusses für nichtig zu erklären, soweit damit die Rückforderung der angeblichen Beihilfen angeordnet wird;
 —
 Art. 4 des angefochtenen Beschlusses für nichtig zu erklären, soweit darin zur Rechtmäßigkeit privater Verträge zwischen den Investoren und anderen Marktteilnehmern Stellung genommen wird;
 —
 der Kommission die Kosten dieses Verfahrens aufzuerlegen.
 Klagegründe und wesentliche Argumente
 Die Klagegründe und wesentlichen Argumente sind dieselben wie in der Rechtssache T-700/13, Bankia/Kommission.


type: contracts

text:
 Avis juridique important
 |
 22002D0751
 2002/751/EG: Beslut nr 3/2002 av associeringsrådet EU–Tjeckien av den 18 juni 2002 om antagande av villkoren för Tjeckiens deltagande i gemenskapens Fiscalis-program
 Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning nr L 246 , 13/09/2002 s. 0030 - 0032
 Beslut nr 3/2002 av associeringsrådet EU-Tjeckienav den 18 juni 2002om antagande av villkoren för Tjeckiens deltagande i gemenskapens Fiscalis-program(2002/751/EG)ASSOCIERINGSRÅDET HAR BESLUTAT FÖLJANDEmed beaktande av Europaavtalet om upprättande av en associering mellan Europeiska gemenskaperna och deras medlemsstater, å ena sidan, och Tjeckien, å andra sidan(1),med beaktande av tilläggsprotokollet till Europaavtalet om Tjeckiens deltagande i gemenskapsprogrammen(2), särskilt artiklarna 1 och 2 i detta, ochav följande skäl:(1) Enligt artikel 1 i tilläggsprotokollet får Tjeckien delta i gemenskapens ramprogram, särskilda program, projekt eller andra åtgärder inom en lång rad områden.(2) I artikel 1 föreskrivs vidare att även andra områden inom gemenskapens verksamhet än de som förtecknas i den artikeln kan komma att omfattas.(3) Enligt artikel 2 i tilläggsprotokollet skall associeringsrådet bestämma villkoren för Tjeckiens deltagande i de verksamheter som avses i artikel 1.HÄRIGENOM FÖRESKRIVS FÖLJANDE.Artikel 1Tjeckien skall delta i Europeiska gemenskapens Fiscalis-program (nedan kallat programmet) på de villkor som anges i bilagorna I och II, vilka skall utgöra en integrerad del av detta beslut.Artikel 2Detta beslut skall tillämpas under programmets återstående giltighetstid. Om gemenskapen beslutar att förlänga giltighetstiden utan några betydande ändringar i programmet, förlängs även detta beslut automatiskt i motsvarande utsträckning om ingen av parterna säger upp det.Artikel 3Detta beslut träder i kraft samma dag som det antas av associeringsrådet.Utfärdat i Bryssel den 18 juni 2002.På associeringsrådets vägnarJ. KavanOrdförande(1) EGT L 360, 31.12.1994, s. 2.(2) EGT L 317, 30.12.1995, s. 45.BILAGA IVILLKOR FÖR TJECKIENS DELTAGANDE I FISCALIS-PROGRAMMET1. Som framgår av artikel 7 i Europaparlamentets och rådets beslut nr 888/98/EG av den 30 mars 1998 om antagande av gemenskapens åtgärdsprogram för att förbättra systemen för indirekt beskattning på den inre marknaden (Fiscalis-programmet)(1) (nedan kallat programmet) - skall Tjeckien delta i programmet i enlighet med de villkor som anges i Europaavtalet och tilläggsprotokollet till detta och i den omfattning som är tillåten enligt gemenskapslagstiftningen om indirekt beskattning. Tjeckien skall således delta i programmets verksamhet på följande villkor:- Deltagande i de verksamheter som avses i artikel 4 (system för kommunikation och informationsutbyte, handböcker och guider) skall medges i den omfattning som är tillåten enligt gemenskapslagstiftningen om indirekt beskattning.- Deltagande i de verksamheter som avses i artikel 5.1 (tjänstemannautbyte) och 5.2 (seminarier) och i artikel 6 (gemensamma utbildningsinitiativ) skall medges enligt de villkor som fastställs i dessa artiklar.- Deltagande i de verksamheter som avses i artikel 5.3 (multilaterala kontroller) kommer inte att medges, eftersom gemenskapens rättsliga ram för samarbete på detta område enligt direktiv 77/799/EEG(2) och förordning (EEG) nr 218/1992(3) endast gäller de länder som är medlemsstater i Europeiska unionen.2. Villkoren för inlämnande, bedömning och urval av ansökningar rörande seminarier och utbyten avseende tjänstemän från Tjeckien skall vara desamma som för tjänstemän från de 15 nationella administrationerna i Europeiska gemenskapens medlemsstater.3. I bilaga II fastställs det finansiella bidrag som Tjeckien i början av varje budgetår måste betala till Europeiska unionens allmänna budget för att täcka de kostnader som uppstår i samband med dess deltagande i programmet under perioden 2001-2002. I enlighet med de principer som fastställs i artikel 108.2 i Europaavtalet om upprättande av en associering mellan Europeiska gemenskaperna och deras medlemsstater, å ena sidan, och Tjeckiska republiken, å andra sidan, har associeringskommittén rätt att närhelst det är nödvändigt anpassa detta bidrag.4. Företrädare för Tjeckien kommer att delta som observatörer och angående punkter som berör dem i den ständiga kommitté för administrativt samarbete inom området för indirekta skatter som avses i artikel 11.1 i beslut nr 888/98/EG. De tjeckiska företrädarna skall inte delta i dessa möten när det gäller de övriga punkterna eller i samband med omröstning.5. Europeiska gemenskapens medlemsstater och Tjeckien kommer inom ramen för gällande bestämmelser att göra sitt yttersta för att underlätta fri rörlighet och vistelse för alla personer som kan komma i fråga för programmet och som förflyttar sig mellan Tjeckien och EG:s medlemsstater för att delta i verksamhet som omfattas av detta beslut.6. Utan att det påverkar Europeiska gemenskapernas kommissions och Europeiska gemenskapernas revisionsrätts ansvar i fråga om övervakning och utvärdering av programmet i enlighet med beslut nr 888/98/EG kommer Tjeckiens deltagande i programmet att kontinuerligt övervakas inom ramen för ett partnerskap mellan Tjeckien och kommissionen. Tjeckien kommer att lämna de rapporter som krävs till kommissionen och delta i andra särskilda verksamheter som gemenskapen anger i detta sammanhang.7. Det språk som skall användas i ansökningsförfaranden, kontrakt, rapporter som skall lämnas in och andra administrativa förfaranden inom ramen för programmet skall vara ett av Europeiska gemenskapens officiella språk.8. Gemenskapen och Tjeckien kan när som helst med tolv månaders varsel skriftligen säga upp verksamhet som omfattas av detta beslut. De verksamheter som pågår vid tidpunkten för uppsägningen skall fortsätta till dess att de slutförts enligt de villkor som anges i detta beslut.(1) EGT L 126, 28.4.1998, s. 1.(2) EGT L 336, 27.12.1997, s. 15. Direktivet senast ändrat genom 1994 års anslutningsakt.(3) EGT L 24, 1.2.1992, s. 1.BILAGA IITJECKIENS FINANSIELLA BIDRAG TILL PROGRAMMET1. Tjeckiens finansiella bidrag skall läggas till det belopp som varje år anslås i Europeiska unionens allmänna budget för åtagandebemyndiganden för att kommissionens finansiella skyldigheter i samband med arbetet med att genomföra, förvalta och driva Fiscalis-programmet (nedan kallat programmet) skall kunna fullgöras.2. Det finansiella bidraget har beräknats med utgångspunkt från ett dagtraktamente på i medeltal 146 euro och ett resebidrag på i medeltal 695 euro för kostnader i samband med deltagande i seminarier och utbyten. Vid beräkningen av det finansiella bidraget har det uppskattats att Tjeckien kommer att delta i, i medeltal, 15 seminarier och 25 utbyten per år. Det finansiella bidraget får justeras i början av varje år med hänsyn till det faktiska antal verksamheter i vilka Tjeckien planerar att delta under året. Justeringen kommer att ske genom den uppmaning om betalning som Tjeckien kommer att få från kommissionen såsom anges nedan i punkt 6.3. Om inte annat beslutas med stöd av villkoren i punkt 2 kommer Tjeckiens bidrag att uppgå till 109638 euro för varje år som landet deltar. Av detta belopp kommer 7173 euro att täcka de administrativa tilläggskostnader för kommissionens förvaltning av programmet som uppstår i samband med Tjeckiens deltagande.4. Tjeckien kommer över sin nationella budget att betala de årliga administrativa tilläggskostnader som avses i punkt 3.5. Tjeckien kommer att betala 50 % av den resterande årliga kostnaden för sitt deltagande över sin nationella budget för år 2001, 60 % för 2002.Om inte annat följer av det särskilda programplaneringsförfarandet för Phare kommer återstående 50 % att betalas från Tjeckiens Phare-tilldelning för år 2001, 40 % för 2002 - detta under förutsättning att de nödvändiga budgetmedlen finns tillgängliga. De erforderliga Phare-medlen kommer att överföras till Tjeckien med stöd av en särskild finansieringsöverenskommelse. Dessa medel kommer tillsammans med den del som tas från Tjeckiens statsbudget att utgöra Tjeckiens nationella bidrag från vilket Tjeckien kommer att göra betalningar på grundval av kommissionens årliga betalningsinfordran.6. Budgetförordningen för Europeiska unionens allmänna budget(1) skall tillämpas, särskilt vad gäller förvaltningen av Tjeckiens bidrag.När detta beslut träder i kraft skall kommissionen sända en eller flera uppmaningar till Tjeckien att betala in ett belopp som motsvarar dess bidrag till kostnaderna för verksamheterna under året. Detta bidrag skall anges i euro och betalas in på ett av kommissionen öppnat bankkonto i euro.Tjeckien skall betala sitt bidrag i enlighet med kommissionens betalningsuppmaningar- när det gäller den del som finansiera över den nationella budgeten, senast tre månader efter det att dessa avsänts, och- när det gäller den del som finansieras genom Phare, senast 30 dagar efter det att Phare-medlen skickats till landet.Vid försenad inbetalning skall Tjeckien betala dröjsmålsränta på utestående belopp räknat från förfallodagen. Räntesatsen skall vara den räntesats som Europeiska centralbanken tillämpar för sina transaktioner i euro under den månad då betalningen förfaller med ett tillägg av 1,5 procentenheter.7. Dagtraktamentena skall gälla för alla programmets deltagare och fastställas av kommissionen för varje enskilt land. Tjeckien kommer att få ett första budgetförskott från kommissionen vilket skall utbetalas i början av varje år. En andra förskottsutbetalning kan ske vid mitten av året beroende på i vilken utsträckning Tjeckien deltagit i programverksamheten och förväntas delta under resten av året. Den berörda tjeckiska avdelningen skall använda dessa förskott för att betala för de tjeckiska deltagarnas färdhandlingar och uppehälle.8. De kostnader för resor och uppehälle som Tjeckiens företrädare och experter ådrar sig i samband med sin medverkan som observatörer i det kommittéarbete som avses punkt 4 i bilaga I skall ersättas av kommissionen på samma grundval som när det gäller Europeiska unionens medlemsstater.(1) EGT L 356, 31.12.1977, s. 1. Förordningen senast ändrad genom förordning (EG) nr 762/2001 (EGT 111, 20.4.2001, s. 1).


text:
 15.12.2016
 BG
 Официален вестник на Европейския съюз
 L 341/75
 РЕШЕНИЕ НА СЪВМЕСТНИЯ КОМИТЕТ НА ЕИП
 No 174/2015
 от 11 юни 2015 година
 за изменение на Протокол 31 към Споразумението за ЕИП относно сътрудничеството в специфични области извън четирите свободи [2016/2209]
 СЪВМЕСТНИЯТ КОМИТЕТ НА ЕИП,
 като взе предвид Споразумението за Европейското икономическо пространство („Споразумението за ЕИП“), и по-специално членове 86 и 98 от него,
 като има предвид, че:
 (1)
 Регламент (ЕС) No 1296/2013 на Европейския парламент и на Съвета от 11 декември 2013 г. относно Програма на Европейския съюз за заетост и социални иновации („EaSI“) и за изменение на Решение No 283/2010/ЕС за създаване на Европейски механизъм за микрофинансиране за трудова заетост и социално приобщаване „Прогрес“ (1) беше включен в Споразумението за ЕИП с Решение на Съвместния комитет No 151/2014 от 27 юни 2014 г. (2)
 (2)
 Ограниченото участие на Норвегия в програмата следва да бъде разширено, за да включи и оста „Прогрес“.
 (3)
 Поради това Протокол 31 към Споразумението за ЕИП следва да бъде изменено, за да се даде възможност това разширено сътрудничество да започне от 1 януари 2015 г.,
 ПРИЕ НАСТОЯЩОТО РЕШЕНИЕ:
 Член 1
 В член 15, параграф 8 от Протокол 31 към Споразумението за ЕИП думите „оста EURES“ се заменят с думите „оси Прогрес и EURES“:
 Член 2
 Настоящото решение влиза в сила в деня след внасянето на последната нотификация, предвидена в член 103, параграф 1 от Споразумението за ЕИП (*1).
 Прилага се от 1 януари 2015 г.
 Член 3
 Настоящото решение се публикува в раздела за ЕИП и в притурката за ЕИП към Официален вестник на Европейския съюз.
 Съставено в Брюксел на 11 юни 2015 година.
 За Съвместния комитет на ЕИП
 Председател
 Gianluca GRIPPA
 (1) ОВ L 347, 20.12.2013 г., стр. 238.
 (2) Вж. страница 44 от настоящия брой на Официален вестник.
 (*1) Без отбелязани конституционни изисквания.


text:
 20.12.2008
 FR
 Journal officiel de l'Union européenne
 C 327/9
 Demande de décision préjudicielle présentée par la Corte d'appello di Roma (Italie) le 12 septembre 2008 — Istituto nazionale della previdenza sociale (INPS)/Daniela Lotti et Clara Matteucci
 (Affaire C-396/08)
 (2008/C 327/14)
 Langue de procédure: l'italien
 Juridiction de renvoi
 Corte d'appello di Roma (Italie).
 Parties dans la procédure au principal
 Partie requérante: Istituto nazionale della previdenza sociale (INPS).
 Parties défenderesses: Daniela Lotti et Clara Matteucci.
 Questions préjudicielles
 1)
 La législation italienne (à savoir, l'article 7, paragraphe 1, de la loi 638/83) qui conduit à ne pas tenir compte, au titre de la durée des cotisations utiles pour l'acquisition du droit à pension, des périodes non travaillées dans le cadre d'un travail à temps partiel vertical, est-elle conforme à la directive 97/81/CE (1) et notamment à la clause 4 [de l'accord-cadre qui lui est annexé], relative au principe de non-discrimination?
 2)
 La législation nationale précitée est-elle conforme à la directive et notamment à la clause 1 [de l'accord-cadre qui lui est annexé] — où il est prévu que la législation nationale doit faciliter le développement du travail à temps partiel et aux clauses 4 et 5 [de l'accord-cadre précité] — qui imposent aux États membres d'éliminer les obstacles de nature juridique ou administrative qui peuvent limiter les possibilités de travail à temps partiel, étant entendu que l'absence de prise en considération, aux fins de la pension, des semaines non travaillées, constitue un obstacle important au choix d'un travail à temps partiel sous une forme de type vertical?
 3)
 La clause 4 [de l'accord-cadre précité] relative au principe de non-discrimination peut-elle être étendue également au domaine des divers types de contrats à temps partiel puisque, dans le cas d'un travail à temps partiel horizontal, pour un nombre égal d'heures travaillées et rémunérées dans l'année civile, sur la base de la législation nationale, toutes les semaines de l'année civile sont prises en considération, à la différence de ce qui est le cas dans le temps partiel vertical?
 (1) Directive 97/81/CE du Conseil du 15 décembre 1997 concernant l'accord-cadre sur le travail à temps partiel conclu par l'UNICE, le CEEP et la CES — Annexe: Accord- cadre sur le travail à temps partiel (JO L 14 du 20 janvier 1998, p. 9).


type: other

text:
Mokesčių grąžinimas Norvegijoje. Pirminės pajamų deklaracijos Skattemelding 2018 / Tax return 2018. | Skatt.lt
 Mokesčių grąžinimas Norvegijoje. Pirminės pajamų deklaracijos Skattemelding 2018 / Tax return 2018.
 Nuo 04.04.2019 elektroniniai Altinn sistemos vartotojai pirmines pajamų deklaracijas ( Skattemelding 2018 arba Tax return 2018) gali matyti elektroniniu būdu. Tam reikalingi Altinn, MiniID, BankID ar kt. prisijungimo kodai.
 Jeigu neesate elektroninis Altinn sistemos vartotojas (prisijungimo kodų neturite), pirminės deklaracijos dokumentai ( Skattemelding 2018 arba Tax return 2018) jums bus išsiųsti popieriniu būdu. Juos gausite paprastu paštu balandžio mėnesio eigoje.
 Jau matote savo pirminės deklaracijos dokumentą – Skattemelding arba Tax return. Ką daryti toliau? Pirmiausia pasitikrinkite, ar nurodytos pajamų/mokesčių sumos yra teisingos (pagal algalapius arba metines pajamų ataskaitas). DĖMESIO – atostoginiai įeina į jūsų metines pajamas (yra apmokestinami).
 Skattemelding 2018 arba Tax return 2018 dokumente turite žiūrėti 5 arba 7 puslapį.
 Čia matote pavyzdį (Pvz. 1), kur mokesčių mokėtojui paskaičiuota grąžinama mokesčių suma (TIL GODE arba OVERPAID TAX).
 Pvz. 1
 Čia matote pavyzdį (Pvz. 2), kur mokesčių mokėtojui paskaičiuota mokesčių skola (-Å BETALE arba UNDERPAID TAX).
 Pvz. 2
 Gali būti ir taip, kad pirminėje deklaracijoje nenurodytas galutinis paskaičiavimas (Pvz. 3). Rezultatą matysite tik gavę galutinę pajamų deklaraciją (laikotarpiu 20.06.2019 – 23.10.2019 ).
 Pavyzdys kaip atrodo nepaskaičiuota pirminė deklaracija (šiame lape nurodyti tik visi sumokėti jūsų mokesčiai 2018 m.) .
 Kaip žinoti, kur bus pervedamas mokesčių grąžinimas iš Norvegijos?
 Šiame pavyzdyje (Pvz. 1) matote užregistruotą banko sąskaitą (turite matyti savo banko sąskaitos paskutinius skaičius). Reiškia mokesčių grąžinimą gausite pavedimu į nurodytą banko sąskaitą. jeigu norite banko sąskaitą pasikeisti, reikia užsipildyti sąskaitos keitimo mokesčių grąžinimui formą čia: www.skatteetaten.no/endrekonto . Tai padaryti reikia kol dar negavote galutinės pajamų deklaracijos (Skatteoppgjør 2018 ar Tax assessment notice 2018).
 Jeigu reikės pagalbos dėl banko sąskaitos keitimo, rašykite mums į info@skatt.lt .
 O šiame pavyzdyje (Pvz. 2) banko sąskaita nėra užregistruota ir mokesčių grąžinimas iš Norvegijos bus siunčiamas popieriniu čekiu, kurį reikės išsigryninti banke. Pastaba – Lietuvos bankai nebegrynina tokių čekių, todėl turėsite problemų pasiimti pinigėlius. Jeigu matote neužregistruotą banko sąskaitą, būtinai užsipildykite šią formą: www.skatteetaten.no/endrekonto . Tai padaryti reikia kol dar negavote galutinės pajamų deklaracijos (Skatteoppgjør 2018 ar Tax assessment notice 2018).
 Jeigu reikės pagalbos dėl banko sąskaitos nurodymo mokesčių grąžinimui, rašykite mums į info@skatt.lt .
 Ar mokesčių lengvatos yra pritaikomos automatiškai ?
 Ne, nėra. Jeigu turite teisę į mokesčių lengvatas, jas būtinai turite užsipildyti pirminėje deklaracijoje į tam skirtus laukelius.
 Viską pasitikrinus, užpildžius bei prisegus dokumentus – deklaraciją patvirtinti ir išsiųsti (elektroniniu būdu per altinn sistemą arba popieriniu būdu).
 Tuomet belieka laukti mokesčių grąžinimo, kuris vyks dviem etapais:
 15.08.2019 – 23.10.2019
 Pajamų deklaracijų pateikimo terminas iki 30.04.2019 . Pavėluotai pajamų deklaracijas galima pateikti iki 31.05.2019.
 Dėl pajamų deklaracijos tvarkymo, prašome užpildyti formą: https://www.skatt.lt/paslaugos/mokesciu-grazinimas/#forma_inside
 Tel. +370 615 45566


type: wikipedia

text:
Hřešihlavská (nebo též Hřešihlavsko) byl přírodní park v okrese Plzeň-sever.
 Přírodní park byl zřízen jako oblast klidu v roce 1978 vyhláškou ONV Plzeň-sever. Ležel na levém břehu zalesněného údolí Berounky a dolního toku Radnického potoka mezi Liblínem a Zvíkovcem. Park byl ohraničen vesnicemi Rakolusky, Bohy, Brodeslavy, Všehrdy a Hlince a odkazoval svým názvem k vesnici Hřešihlavy. Rozlohou 978,8 ha patřil mezi nejmenší přírodní parky Plzeňského kraje.
 Na území přírodního parku se nacházely přírodní rezervace Krašov, zřícenina hradu Krašov, jeskyně Kamenná maštal a potoky Brodeslavský, Krašovský a Všehrdský potok. V Hlineckém lese jsou lokality s mnoha desítkami mravenišť mravence lesního.
 Hřešihlavská sousedila s přírodními parky Horní Berounka a Rohatiny.
 Dne 26. června 2021 přírodní park zanikl. Území zrušeného přírodního parku zahrnuje téhož dne nově vytvořený přírodní park Berounka.
 Reference
 Externí odkazy
 Hřešihlavská
 Chráněná území v okrese Plzeň-sever
 Chráněná území vyhlášená roku 1978
 Zrušená chráněná území v Česku
 Přírodní park Berounka


type: legislation

jurisdiction: US

text:
 116 S4505 IS: Coronavirus Emergency Education Grants Act
 U.S. Senate
 2020-08-06
 text/xml
 EN
 Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.
 II116th CONGRESS2d SessionS. 4505IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATESAugust 6, 2020Mr. Cruz introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on FinanceA BILLTo provide one-time grants to parents and guardians for student education expenses, to establish emergency education freedom grants, and to provide tax credits for donations to eligible scholarship-granting organizations, and for other purposes.1.Short titleThis Act may be cited as the Coronavirus Emergency Education Grants Act.2.Grants to parents and guardians for student education expenses(a)In generalThe Secretary, in consultation with the Secretary of Education, shall establish a program to make one-time direct payments to parents or guardians to offset the educational expenses that such individuals incurred in educating their children during the period of March 2020 to June 2021.(b)Contents of programThe program carried out under subsection (a) shall have the following requirements:(1)The Secretary shall make only one payment for each child. Such payment will be made to the child’s legal parent or guardian. Such payment shall be the lesser of $10,000 or the combined actual past and future out-of-pocket educational expenses incurred, or that will be incurred, by the legal parent or guardian for his or her child’s education during the period of March 2020 to June 2021.(2)The Secretary shall only make a payment to a parent or guardian who is a citizen of the United States or lawfully residing in the United States.(3)The Secretary shall only make a payment to a parent or guardian who is the legal parent or guardian of the child.(4)The Secretary, in consultation with the Secretary of Education, shall establish a web portal in which the legal parent or guardian of a child may apply to receive this one-time payment. The Secretary shall request such information as is necessary to—(A)establish a parent or guardian’s total out-of-pocket costs for educating his or her child during the period of March 2020 to June 2021;(B)establish the parent or guardian’s identity, establish the parent or guardian’s citizenship or lawful resident status;(C)establish that parent or guardian is the legal parent or guardian of the child and the child’s identity; and (D)establish and maintain the program and prevent fraud, waste, or abuse of program payments and funds. (5)The Secretary shall only make payments to legal parents and guardians that have applied through the web portal and provided such information as required by the Secretary, in consultation with the Secretary of Education. The web portal shall be established within 60 days of the date of enactment of this Act. (6)The Secretary shall require parents or guardians who have received a payment from the program to maintain records of how such individuals spent the payment. The Secretary shall develop procedures to audit such records, mitigate fraud, waste, and abuse within the program, and recoup program funds and payments from individuals who have committed fraud, waste, or abuse.(c)DefinitionsIn this section:(1)Educational expensesThe term educational expenses—(A)means— (i)tuition for elementary or secondary education;(ii)elementary or secondary education curriculum and curricular materials;(iii)books or other instructional materials for elementary or secondary education;(iv)online elementary or secondary education educational materials and expenses incurred to access these online educational materials;(v) tuition for tutoring or elementary or secondary educational classes outside of the home, including at a tutoring facility, but only if the tutor or instructor is not related to the student and—(I)is licensed as a teacher in any State;(II)has taught at an eligible educational institution as established by the Secretary; or(III)is a subject matter expert in the relevant subject as established by the Secretary;(vi)fees for a nationally standardized norm-referenced achievement test, an advanced placement examination, or any examination related to admission to an institution of higher education;(vii)fees for dual enrollment in an institution of higher education; and(viii)educational therapies for students with disabilities provided by a licensed or accredited practitioner or provider, including occupational, behavioral, physical, and speech-language therapies; and(B)includes expenses for the purposes described in clauses (i) through (viii) of subparagraph (A) in connection with a homeschool (whether treated as a homeschool or a private school for purposes of applicable State law).(2)SecretaryThe term Secretary means the Secretary of the Treasury or the Secretary's delegate.(d)Authorization and appropriation(1)In generalThere are authorized to be appropriated, and there are appropriated, out of any amounts in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, such sums as are necessary to enable the Secretary, in consultation with the Secretary of Education, to establish and carry out this program. (2)Emergency designation(A)In generalThe amounts provided by this section are designated as an emergency requirement pursuant to section 4(g) of the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010 (2 U.S.C. 933(g)).(B)Designation in senateIn the Senate, this section is designated as an emergency requirement pursuant to section 4112(a) of H. Con. Res. 71 (115th Congress), the concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal year 2018. 3.Education Freedom Scholarships and Opportunity(a)Emergency education freedom grants(1)DefinitionsIn this subsection:(A)Definitions from the Internal Revenue Code of 1986The definitions in section 25E(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as added by subsection (b), shall apply to this subsection, except as otherwise provided. (B)Emergency education freedom grant fundsThe term emergency education freedom grant funds means the amount of funds available under paragraph (2)(A) for this subsection that are not reserved under paragraph (3)(A)(i). (C)SecretaryThe term Secretary means the Secretary of Education.(D)StateThe term State means each of the 50 States, the District of Columbia, and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.(2)Grants(A)Program authorizedFrom any amounts appropriated for section 18003 of division B of the CARES Act (Public Law 116–136) on or after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall, notwithstanding any other provision of title XVIII of division B of the CARES Act, use 10 percent of such amounts to carry out paragraph (3) and award emergency education freedom grants to States with approved applications, in order to enable the States to award subgrants to eligible scholarship-granting organizations under paragraph (4).(B)TimingThe Secretary shall make the allotments required under this paragraph by not later than 30 days after the date of enactment of this Act.(3)Reservation and allotments(A)In generalFrom the amounts made available under paragraph (2)(A), the Secretary shall—(i)reserve—(I)one-half of 1 percent for allotments for the United States Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, to be distributed among those outlying areas on the basis of their relative need, as determined by the Secretary, in accordance with the purpose of this subsection; and(II)one-half of 1 percent of such amounts for the Secretary of the Interior, acting through the Bureau of Indian Education, to be used to provide subgrants described in paragraph (4) to eligible scholarship-granting organizations that serve students attending elementary schools or secondary schools operated or funded by the Bureau of Indian Education; and(ii)subject to subparagraph (B), allot each State that submits an approved application under this subsection the sum of—(I)the amount that bears the same relation to 20 percent of the emergency education freedom grant funds as the number of individuals aged 5 through 17 in the State, as determined by the Secretary on the basis of the most recent satisfactory data, bears to the number of those individuals, as so determined, in all such States that submitted approved applications; and(II)an amount that bears the same relationship to 80 percent of the emergency education freedom grant funds as the number of individuals aged 5 through 17 from families with incomes below the poverty line in the State, as determined by the Secretary on the basis of the most recent satisfactory data, bears to the number of those individuals, as so determined, in all such States that submitted approved applications.(B)Minimum allotmentNo State shall receive an allotment under this paragraph for a fiscal year that is less than one-half of 1 percent of the emergency education freedom grant funds available for such fiscal year. (4)Subgrants to eligible scholarship-granting organizations(A)In generalA State that receives an allotment under this subsection shall use the allotment to award subgrants, on a basis determined appropriate by the State, to eligible scholarship-granting organizations in the State.(B)Initial timing(i)States with existing tax credit scholarship programBy not later than 30 days after receiving an allotment under paragraph (3)(A)(ii), a State with an existing, as of the date of application for an allotment under this subsection, tax credit scholarship program shall use not less than 50 percent of the allotment to award subgrants to eligible scholarship-granting organizations in the State.(ii)States without tax credit scholarship programsBy not later than 60 days after receiving an allotment under paragraph (3)(A)(ii), a State without a tax credit scholarship program shall use not less than 50 percent of the allotment to award subgrants to eligible scholarship-granting organizations in the State.(C)Uses of fundsAn eligible scholarship-granting organization that receives a subgrant under this paragraph—(i)may reserve not more than 5 percent of the subgrant funds for public outreach, student and family support activities, and administrative expenses related to the subgrant; and(ii)shall use not less than 95 percent of the subgrant funds to provide qualifying scholarships for qualified expenses only to individual elementary school and secondary school students who reside in the State in which the eligible scholarship-granting organization is recognized. (5)ReallocationA State shall return to the Secretary any amounts of the allotment received under this subsection that the State does not award as subgrants under paragraph (4) by March 30, 2021, and the Secretary shall reallocate such funds to the remaining eligible States in accordance with paragraph (3)(A)(ii). (6)Rules of constructionThe rules of construction under section 25E(d) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as added by subsection (b), shall apply to this subsection in the same manner as such rules apply to section 25E of such Code, as so added.(b)Tax credits for contributions to eligible scholarship-Granting organizations(1)Credit for individualsSubpart A of part IV of subchapter A of chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding after section 25D the following new section:25E.Contributions to eligible scholarship-granting organizations(a)Allowance of creditSubject to section 3(c)(3) of the Coronavirus Emergency Education Grants Act, in the case of an individual, there shall be allowed as a credit against the tax imposed by this chapter for the taxable year an amount equal to the sum of any qualified contributions made by the taxpayer during the taxable year.(b)Amount of creditThe credit allowed under subsection (a) for any taxable year shall not exceed 10 percent of the taxpayer’s adjusted gross income for the taxable year.(c)DefinitionsFor purposes of this section—(1)Eligible scholarship-granting organizationThe term eligible scholarship-granting organization means—(A)an organization that—(i)is described in section 501(c)(3) and exempt from taxation under section 501(a),(ii)provides qualifying scholarships to individual elementary and secondary students who—(I)reside in the State in which the eligible scholarship-granting organization is recognized, or(II)in the case of the Bureau of Indian Education, are members of a federally recognized tribe,(iii)a State identifies to the Secretary as an eligible scholarship-granting organization under section 3(c)(3)(E)(ii) of the Coronavirus Emergency Education Grants Act,(iv)allocates at least 90 percent of qualified contributions to qualifying scholarships on an annual basis, and(v)provides qualifying scholarships to—(I)more than 1 eligible student,(II)more than 1 eligible family, and(III)different eligible students attending more than 1 education provider, or(B)an organization that—(i)is described in section 501(c)(3) and exempt from taxation under section 501(a), and(ii)pursuant to State law, was able, as of January 1, 2021, to receive contributions that are eligible for a State tax credit if such contributions are used by the organization to provide scholarships to individual elementary and secondary students, including scholarships for attending private schools. (2)Qualified contributionThe term qualified contribution means a contribution of cash to any eligible scholarship-granting organization.(3)Qualified expenseThe term qualified expense means any educational expense that is—(A)for an individual student’s elementary or secondary education, as recognized by the State, or(B)for the secondary education component of an individual elementary or secondary student’s career and technical education, as defined by section 3(5) of the Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Act of 2006 (20 U.S.C. 2302(5)). (4)Qualifying scholarshipThe term qualifying scholarship means a scholarship granted by an eligible scholarship-granting organization to an individual elementary or secondary student for a qualified expense. (5)StateThe term State means each of the 50 States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the outlying areas (as defined in section 1121(c) of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 6331(c)), and the Department of the Interior (acting through the Bureau of Indian Education)).(d)Rules of construction(1)In generalA qualifying scholarship awarded to a student from the proceeds of a qualified contribution under this section shall not be considered assistance to the school or other educational provider that enrolls, or provides educational services to, the student or the student's parents.(2)Exclusion from incomeGross income shall not include any amount received by an individual as a qualifying scholarship and such amount shall not be taken into account as income or resources for purposes of determining the eligibility of such individual or any other individual for benefits or assistance, or the amount or extent of such benefits or assistance, under any Federal program or under any State or local program financed in whole or in part with Federal funds.(3)Prohibition of control over nonpublic education providers(A)(i)Nothing in this section shall be construed to permit, allow, encourage, or authorize any Federal control over any aspect of any private, religious, or home education provider, whether or not a home education provider is treated as a private school or home school under State law.(ii) This section shall not be construed to exclude private, religious, or home education providers from participation in programs or services under this section.(B)Nothing in this section shall be construed to permit, allow, encourage, or authorize an entity submitting a list of eligible scholarship-granting organizations on behalf of a State pursuant to section 3(c)(3)(E) of the Coronavirus Emergency Education Grants Act to mandate, direct, or control any aspect of a private or home education provider, regardless of whether or not a home education provider is treated as a private school under State law.(C)No participating State or entity acting on behalf of a State pursuant to section 3(c)(3)(E) of the Coronavirus Emergency Education Grants Act shall exclude, discriminate against, or otherwise disadvantage any education provider with respect to programs or services under this section based in whole or in part on the provider’s religious character or affiliation, including religiously based or mission-based policies or practices.(4)Parental rights to use scholarshipsNo participating State or entity acting on behalf of a State pursuant to section 3(c)(3)(E) of the Coronavirus Emergency Education Grants Act shall disfavor or discourage the use of qualifying scholarships for the purchase of elementary and secondary education services, including those services provided by private or nonprofit entities, such as faith-based providers.(5)State and local authorityNothing in this section shall be construed to modify a State or local government’s authority and responsibility to fund education.(e)Denial of double benefitThe Secretary shall prescribe such regulations or other guidance to ensure that the sum of the tax benefits provided by Federal, State, or local law for a qualified contribution receiving a Federal tax credit in any taxable year does not exceed the sum of the qualified contributions made by the taxpayer for the taxable year.(f)Carryforward of creditIf a tax credit allowed under this section is not fully used within the applicable taxable year because of insufficient tax liability on the part of the taxpayer, the unused amount may be carried forward for a period not to exceed 5 years.(g)ElectionThis section shall apply to a taxpayer for a taxable year only if the taxpayer elects to have this section apply for such taxable year.(h)Alternative minimum taxFor purposes of calculating the alternative minimum tax under section 55, a taxpayer may use any credit received for a qualified contribution under this section..(2)Clerical amendmentThe table of sections for subpart A of part IV of subchapter A of chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 25D the following new item:Sec. 25E. Contributions to eligible scholarship-granting organizations..(3)Credit for corporationsSubpart D of part IV of subchapter A of chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the following new section:45U.Contributions to eligible scholarship-granting organizations(a)Allowance of creditSubject to section 3(c)(3) of the Coronavirus Emergency Education Grants Act, for purposes of section 38, in the case of a domestic corporation, there shall be allowed as a credit against the tax imposed by this chapter for the taxable year an amount equal to the sum of any qualified contributions (as defined in section 25E(c)(2)) made by such corporation taxpayer during the taxable year.(b)Amount of creditThe credit allowed under subsection (a) for any taxable year shall not exceed 5 percent of the taxable income (as defined in section 170(b)(2)(D)) of the domestic corporation for such taxable year.(c)Additional provisionsFor purposes of this section, any qualified contributions made by a domestic corporation shall be subject to the provisions of section 25E (including subsection (d) of such section), to the extent applicable.(d)ElectionThis section shall apply to a taxpayer for a taxable year only if the taxpayer elects to have this section apply for such taxable year..(4)Credit part of general business creditSection 38(b) is amended—(A)by striking plus at the end of paragraph (32);(B)by striking the period at the end of paragraph (33) and inserting , plus; and(C)by adding at the end the following new paragraph:(34)the credit for qualified contributions determined under section 45U(a)..(5)Clerical amendmentThe table of sections for subpart D of part IV of subchapter A of chapter 1 is amended by adding at the end the following new item:Sec. 45U. Contributions to eligible scholarship-granting organizations..(6)Effective dateThe amendments made by this subsection shall apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2020.(c)Education Freedom Scholarships web portal and administration(1)In generalThe Secretary of the Treasury shall, in coordination with the Secretary of Education, establish, host, and maintain a web portal that—(A)lists all eligible scholarship-granting organizations;(B)enables a taxpayer to make a qualifying contribution to 1 or more eligible scholarship-granting organizations and to immediately obtain both a pre-approval of a tax credit for that contribution and a receipt for tax filings;(C)provides information about the tax benefits under sections 25E and 45U of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986; and(D)enables a State to submit and update information about its programs and its eligible scholarship-granting organizations for informational purposes only, including information on— (i)student eligibility;(ii)allowable educational expenses;(iii)the types of allowable education providers;(iv)the percentage of funds an organization may use for program administration; and(v)the percentage of total contributions the organization awards in a calendar year. (2)Nonportal contributionsA taxpayer may opt to make a contribution directly to an eligible scholarship-granting organization, instead of through the web portal described in paragraph (1), provided that the taxpayer, or the eligible scholarship-granting organization on behalf of the taxpayer, applies for, and receives, pre-approval for a tax credit from the Secretary of the Treasury in coordination with the Secretary of Education.(3)National and State limitations on credits(A)National limitationFor each fiscal year, the total amount of qualifying contributions for which a credit is allowed under sections 25E and 45U of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 shall not exceed $5,000,000,000.(B)Allocation of limitation(i)Initial allocationsFor each calendar year, with respect to the limitation under subparagraph (A), the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of Education, shall—(I)allocate to each State an amount equal to the sum of the qualifying contributions made in the State in the previous year; and(II)from any amounts remaining following allocations made under subclause (I), allocate to each participating State an amount equal to the sum of—(aa)an amount that bears the same relationship to 20 percent of such remaining amount as the number of individuals aged 5 through 17 in the State, as determined by the Secretary of Education on the basis of the most recent satisfactory data, bears to the number of those individuals in all such States, as so determined; and(bb)an amount that bears the same relationship to 80 percent of such remaining amount as the number of individuals aged 5 through 17 from families with incomes below the poverty line in the State, as determined by the Secretary of Education, on the basis of the most recent satisfactory data, bears to the number of those individuals in all such States, as so determined. (ii)Minimum allocationNotwithstanding clause (i), no State receiving an allocation under this subsection may receive less than one-half of 1 percent of the amount allocated for a fiscal year.(iii)Alternative allocation(I)In generalNot later than the end of the fifth year of the program or 1 year after the end of the first fiscal year for which the total amount of credits claimed under section 25E and section 45U of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is $2,500,000,000 or more, whichever comes first, the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of Education, shall, by regulation, provide for an alternative allocation method that shall take effect beginning with the first fiscal year after such regulation takes effect.(II)Alternative allocation methodThe alternative allocation method shall be expressed as a formula based on a combination of the following data for each State, as reported by the State to the Secretary of the Treasury:(aa)The relative percentage of students in the State who receive an elementary or secondary scholarship through a State program that is financed through State tax-credited donations or appropriations and that permits the elementary or secondary scholarship to be used to attend a private school.(bb)The total amount of all elementary and secondary scholarships awarded through a State program that is financed through State tax-credited donations or appropriations compared to the total amount of current State and local expenditures for free public education in the State.(III)Allocation formulaFor any fiscal year to which subclause (I) applies, the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of Education, shall—(aa)for each State, allocate an amount equal to the sum of the qualifying contributions made in the State in the previous year;(bb)allocate 2/3 of the remaining amount (after application of item (aa)) of the national limitation for that year using the alternative allocation method under subclause (II); and(cc)allocate 1/3 of the remaining amount (after application of item (aa) and (bb)) in accordance with clause (i)(II).(IV)IneligibilityFor any fiscal year to which subclause (I) applies, a State that does not provide the Secretary of the Treasury with information described in subclause (II) is not eligible to receive an allocation through the alternative allocation method under such subclause.(C)Allowable partnershipsA State may choose to administer the allocation it receives under subparagraph (B) in partnership with 1 or more States, provided that the eligible scholarship-granting organizations in each partner State serve students who reside in all States in the partnership.(D)Total allocationA State’s allocation, for any fiscal year, is the sum of the amount determined for such State under clauses (i) and (ii) of subparagraph (B), except as provided in subparagraph (B)(iii).(E)Allocation and adjustments(i)Initial allocation to StatesNot later than November 1 of the year preceding a year for which there is a national limitation on credits under subparagraph (A) (referred to in this subsection as the applicable year), or as early as practicable with respect to the first year, the Secretary of the Treasury shall announce the State allocations under subparagraph (B) for the applicable year.(ii)List of eligible scholarship-granting organizations(I)In generalNot later than January 1 of each applicable year, or as early as practicable with respect to the first year, each State shall provide the Secretary of the Treasury a list of eligible scholarship-granting organizations, including a certification that the entity submitting the list on behalf of the State has the authority to perform this function.(II)Rule of constructionNeither this subsection nor any other Federal law shall be construed as limiting the entities that may submit the list on behalf of a State.(iii)Reallocation of unclaimed creditsThe Secretary of the Treasury shall reallocate a State’s allocation to other States, in accordance with subparagraph (B), if the State—(I)chooses not to identify scholarship-granting organizations under clause (ii) in any applicable year; or(II)does not have an existing eligible scholarship-granting organization.(iv)ReallocationOn or after April 1 of any applicable year, the Secretary of the Treasury may reallocate, to 1 or more other States that have eligible scholarship-granting organizations in the States, without regard to subparagraph (B), the allocation of a State for which the State’s allocation has not been claimed.(4)DefinitionsAny term used in this subsection which is also used in section 25E of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 shall have the same meaning as when used in such section.


text:
 23.10.2018
 BG
 Официален вестник на Европейския съюз
 L 264/13
 РЕГЛАМЕНТ ЗА ИЗПЪЛНЕНИЕ (ЕС) 2018/1585 НА КОМИСИЯТА
 от 22 октомври 2018 година
 за предоставяне на дерогация от Регламент (ЕО) No 1967/2006 на Съвета по отношение на минималното разстояние от брега и минималната дълбочина за риболов с гъргър в териториалните води на Хърватия
 ЕВРОПЕЙСКАТА КОМИСИЯ,
 като взе предвид Договора за функционирането на Европейския съюз,
 като взе предвид Регламент (ЕО) No 1967/2006 на Съвета от 21 декември 2006 г. относно мерките за управление на устойчивата експлоатация на рибните ресурси в Средиземно море (1), и по-специално член 13, параграф 5 от него,
 като има предвид, че:
 (1)
 С член 13, параграф 3 от Регламент (ЕО) No 1967/2006 се забранява използването на гъргър в 300-метровата зона от брега или на 50-метровата изобата, където тази дълбочина е достигната на по-малко разстояние от брега.
 (2)
 По искане на някоя от държавите членки Комисията може да позволи дерогация от член 13, параграф 3 от Регламент (ЕО) No 1967/2006, ако са изпълнени определени условия по член 13, параграфи 5 и 9.
 (3)
 На 20 юни 2016 г. Комисията получи искане от Хърватия за дерогация от член 13, параграф 3 от посочения регламент за улов на кефалови риби (Mugilidae) с традиционен гъргър „ciplarica“, за улов на паламуд (Sarda sarda), ивичеста ауксида (Auxis rochei), малък тунец (Euthynnus alletteratus) и едра кехлибарена риба (Seriola dumerili) с традиционен гъргър „palamidara“, за улов на атерина (Atherina boyeri) с традиционен гъргър „oližnica“ и за улов на зарган (Belone belone) с традиционен гъргър „igličara“ в териториалните води на Хърватия.
 (4)
 Искането се отнася до риболовни дейности, които са вече разрешени от Хърватия, и обхваща кораби и риболовни уреди, за които е известно, че извършват риболов в продължение на над пет години и са експлоатирани в рамките плана за управление, приет от Хърватия на 30 март 2018 г. с Министерска наредба (2) в съответствие с член 19, параграф 2 от Регламент (ЕО) No 1967/2006 (наричан по-долу „хърватски план за управление“).
 (5)
 През април, юли и октомври 2016 г., както и през март 2017 г. Научният, технически и икономически комитет по рибарство (НТИКР) разгледа поисканата от Хърватия дерогация и свързания с нея план за управление. НТИКР изтъкна необходимостта от разяснения относно използваните риболовни уреди, прилова, наблюдението и научните данни. Хърватия предостави достатъчно разяснения на Комисията и преразгледа съответно плана за управление, като въведе допълнителни мерки относно контрола, управлението на флота, събирането на данни и наблюдението.
 (6)
 Поисканата от Хърватия дерогация отговаря на условията, посочени в член 13, параграфи 5 и 9 от Регламент (ЕО) No 1967/2006.
 (7)
 По-специално съществуват специфични географски ограничения, обусловени както от специфичната морфологична структура на Хърватия, характеризираща се с дълга брегова ивица и голям брой острови, така и от пространственото разпределение на целевите видове, обхващащо само определени зони и участъци в крайбрежните райони на дълбочина по-малко от 50 m. Поради това местата за риболов са ограничени.
 (8)
 Риболовът не може да се извършва с други уреди, тъй като само гъргърите имат необходимите технически характеристики за извършване на този вид риболов.
 (9)
 Освен това този вид риболов щади морската околна среда, тъй като гъргърите са много селективни, нямат контакт с морското дъно и не могат да се използват над пластовете с Posidonia oceanica.
 (10)
 Искането се отнася до 52 кораба. Поисканата от Хърватия дерогация следователно се отнася до ограничен брой кораби в сравнение с големия район на разпространение на флота с гъргъри, който представлява по-малко от 1 % от целия флот на Хърватия и отговаря на 16 825,84 тона бруто тонаж (БТ).
 (11)
 Тези кораби са включени в списък, съобщен на Комисията в съответствие с член 13, параграф 9 от Регламент (ЕО) No 1967/2006.
 (12)
 Хърватският план за управление установява всички подходящи определения за съответните рибни ресурси и гарантира в съответствие с член 13, параграф 9 от Регламент (ЕО) No 1967/2006, че риболовното усилие няма да се увеличи в бъдеще, тъй като разрешенията за риболов ще бъдат издадени само на определени 52 кораба, които вече имат разрешение за риболов от Хърватия. В това отношение следва да се отбележи, че в съответствие с хърватския план за управление и министерската наредба единствените места за риболов, в които се разрешава ползването на мрежа гъргър „oližnica“, се намират в зоната между нос Lako и нос Crna Punta, както и в риболовните подзони, означени като „E4“ и „F2“, а местата за риболов, в които е разрешен риболовът с всички традиционни мрежи гъргър („ciplarica“, „palamidara“, „igličara“ и „oližnica“) не включват зоните на националните паркове и специалните местообитания, където риболовът е строго забранен, какъвто е случаят със зоната на югоизток от нос Sveti Petar.
 (13)
 Съответните риболовни дейности отговарят на изискванията по член 4 от Регламент (ЕО) No 1967/2006, с които се забранява риболовът над споменатите местообитания. Грибовете се теглят във водната колона и нямат контакт с морското дъно.
 (14)
 Изискванията по член 8, параграф 1, буква з) от Регламент (ЕО) No 1967/2006 не са приложими, тъй като те се отнасят за траулерите.
 (15)
 Що се отнася до изискването за спазване на член 9, параграф 3 от Регламент (ЕО) No 1967/2006, където е установен минималният размер на окото на мрежата, Комисията отбелязва, че в съответствие с член 9, параграф 7 от същия регламент подобна дерогация не е възможна за гъргърите. Комисията отбелязва, че Хърватия не е разрешила дерогация от тези разпоредби в своя план за управление.
 (16)
 Тъй като съответните риболовни дейности се извършват много близо до брега, те не възпрепятстват дейностите на други кораби.
 (17)
 Планът за управление гарантира минимален улов на видове от приложение III към Регланент (ЕО) No 1967/2006, тъй като целевите видове са кефалови риби (Mugilidae), паламуд (Sarda sarda), ивичеста ауксида (Auxis rochei), малък тунец (Euthynnus alletteratus), едра кехлибарена риба (Seriola dumerili), атерина (Atherina boyeri) и зарган (Belone belone), които не са споменати в приложение III към Регламент (ЕО) No 1967/2006.
 (18)
 Риболовните дейности се отличават с висока степен на селективност и не се използват за улов на главоноги.
 (19)
 Планът за управление включва мерки за наблюдение на риболовните дейности, като по този начин отговаря на условията по член 14 от Регламент (ЕО) No 1224/2009 на Съвета (3).
 (20)
 Хърватският план за управление включва мерки за наблюдение на риболовните дейности, както е предвидено в член 13, параграф 9, трета алинея от Регламент (ЕО) No 1967/2006.
 (21)
 Поради това поисканата дерогация следва да бъде предоставена.
 (22)
 Съгласно плана за наблюдение, предвиден в нейния план за управление, Хърватия следва да представя на Комисията отчети през редовни интервали от време.
 (23)
 Ограничението на срока на дерогацията ще позволи да се гарантират своевременни корективни управленски мерки, ако докладът до Комисията покаже незадоволителен природозащитен статус на експлоатирания запас, като същевременно се предвиди възможност за оптимизиране на научната база с цел подобряване на плана за управление.
 (24)
 Мерките, предвидени в настоящия регламент, са в съответствие със становището на Комитета по рибарство и аквакултури,
 ПРИЕ НАСТОЯЩИЯ РЕГЛАМЕНТ:
 Член 1
 Дерогация
 1. Член 13, параграф 3, първа алинея от Регламент (ЕО) No 1967/2006 не се прилага в териториалните води на Хърватия за риболов на:
 а)
 кефалови риби (Mugilidae) с гъргър „ciplarica“;
 б)
 паламуд (Sarda sarda), ивичеста ауксида (Auxis rochei), малък тунец (Euthynnus alletteratus) и едра кехлибарена риба (Seriola dumerili) с гъргър „palamidara“;
 в)
 атерина (Atherina boyeri) с гъргър „oližnica“; и
 г)
 зарган (Belone belone) с гъргър „igličara“.
 2. Посочените в параграф 1 гъргъри се използват от кораби, които:
 а)
 имат регистрационен номер в плана за управление, приет от Хърватия в съответствие с член 19 от Регламент (ЕО) No 1967/2006;
 б)
 извършват риболов в продължение на над пет години и за които не се предвижда бъдещо увеличаване на използваното риболовно усилие; и
 в)
 притежават разрешение за риболов и провеждат операции съгласно хърватския план за управление.
 Член 2
 План за наблюдение и доклад
 В срок от три години от влизането в сила на настоящия регламент Хърватия изпраща на Комисията доклад, изготвен в съответствие с плана за наблюдение, установен в нейния план за управление.
 Член 3
 Влизане в сила
 Настоящият регламент влиза в сила на третия ден след деня на публикуването му в Официален вестник на Европейския съюз.
 Той се прилага от 26 октомври 2018 г. до 26 октомври 2021 г.
 Настоящият регламент е задължителен в своята цялост и се прилага пряко във всички държави членки.
 Съставено в Брюксел на 22 октомври 2018 година.
 За Комисията
 Председател
 Jean-Claude JUNCKER
 (1) ОВ L 36, 8.2.2007 г., стр. 6.
 (2) Pravilnik o obavljanju gospodarskog ribolova na moru okružujućim mrežama plivaricom, palamidarom plivaricom, ciplaricom plivaricom, lokardarom plivaricom igličarom i plivaricom oližnicom, Narodne novine, ОВ 30/2018, изменен с Pravilnik o izmjenama Pravilnika o obavljanju gospodarskog ribolova na moru okružujućim mrežama plivaricom palamidarom, plivaricom ciplaricom, plivaricom lokardarom, plivaricom igličarom i plivaricom oližnicom, ОВ 49/2018, и с Pravilnik o izmjenama i dopuni Pravilnika o obavljanju gospodarskog ribolova na moru okružujućim mrežama plivaricom palamidarom, plivaricom ciplaricom, plivaricom lokardarom, plivaricom igličarom i plivaricom oližnicom, ОВ 62/2018.
 (3) Регламент (ЕО) No 1224/2009 на Съвета от 20 ноември 2009 г. за създаване на система за контрол на Съюза за гарантиране на спазването на правилата на общата политика в областта на рибарството, за изменение на регламенти (ЕО) No 847/96, (ЕО) No 2371/2002, (ЕО) No 811/2004, (ЕО) No 768/2005, (ЕО) No 2115/2005, (ЕО) No 2166/2005, (ЕО) No 388/2006, (ЕО) No 509/2007, (ЕО) No 676/2007, (ЕО) No 1098/2007, (ЕО) No 1300/2008, (ЕО) No 1342/2008 и за отмяна на регламенти (ЕИО) No 2847/93, (ЕО) No 1627/94 и (ЕО) No 1966/2006 (ОВ L 343, 22.12.2009 г., стр. 1).


text:
 6.10.2007
 EL
 Επίσημη Εφημερίδα της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης
 C 235/22
 Προσφυγή-αγωγή της 31ης Ιουλίου 2007 — Ευρωπαϊκή Δυναμική κατά Επιτροπής
 (Υπόθεση T-300/07)
 (2007/C 235/40)
 Γλώσσα διαδικασίας: η αγγλική
 Διάδικοι
 Προσφεύγουσα-ενάγουσα: Ευρωπαϊκή Δυναμική — Προηγμένα Συστήματα Τηλεπικοινωνιών Πληροφορικής και Τηλεματικής ΑΕ (Αθήνα, Ελλάδα) (εκπρόσωπος: Ν. Κορογιαννάκης, δικηγόρος)
 Καθής-εναγόμενη: Επιτροπή των Ευρωπαϊκών Κοινοτήτων
 Αιτήματα της προσφεύγουσας-ενάγουσας
 Η προσφεύγουσα-ενάγουσα (στο εξής: προσφεύγουσα) ζητεί από το Πρωτοδικείο:
 —
 να ακυρώσει την απόφαση της Γενικής Διευθύνσεως Πληροφορικής της Επιτροπής περί απορρίψεως της προσφοράς που υπέβαλε η προσφεύγουσα κατόπιν της προσκλήσεως για την υποβολή προσφορών στο πλαίσιο του ανοιχτού διαγωνισμού ENTR/05/078 — Η ΕΥΡΩΠΗ ΣΟΥ Παρτίδα 1 (εργασίες σύνταξης και μεταφράσεων) για τη διαχείριση και συντήρηση της δικτυακής πύλης «η Ευρώπη σου» (ΕΕ 2006/S 143-153057) και περί αναθέσεως της εκτελέσεως της συμβάσεως στον επιλεγέντα ανάδοχο, η οποία κοινοποιήθηκε στην προσφεύγουσα με έγγραφο της 21ης Μαΐου 2007 (στο εξής: απόφαση περί της παρτίδας 1)·
 —
 να ακυρώσει την απόφαση της Επιτροπής (ΓΔ Πληροφορικής) περί απορρίψεως της προσφοράς που υπέβαλε η προσφεύγουσα κατόπιν της προσκλήσεως για την υποβολή προσφορών στο πλαίσιο του ανοιχτού διαγωνισμού ENTR/05/078 — Η ΕΥΡΩΠΗ ΣΟΥ Παρτίδα 2 (διαχείριση υποδομής) για τη διαχείριση και συντήρηση της δικτυακής πύλης «η Ευρώπη σου» (ΕΕ 2006/S 143-153057) και περί αναθέσεως της εκτελέσεως της συμβάσεως στον επιλεγέντα ανάδοχο, η οποία κοινοποιήθηκε στην προσφεύγουσα με έγγραφο της 13ης Ιουλίου 2007 (στο εξής: απόφαση περί της παρτίδας 2)·
 —
 να υποχρεώσει την Επιτροπή (ΓΔ Πληροφορικής) να αποκαταστήσει τη ζημία που υπέστη η προσφεύγουσα εξαιτίας της συμμετοχής της στη διαδικασία του επίμαχου διαγωνισμού, ύψους 1 125 000 ευρώ όσον αφορά την παρτίδα 1 και 825 000 ευρώ όσον αφορά την παρτίδα 2·
 —
 να καταδικάσει την Επιτροπή (ΓΔ Πληροφορικής) στην καταβολή των δικαστικών και άλλων εξόδων στα οποία υποβλήθηκε η προσφεύγουσα στο πλαίσιο της υπό κρίση προσφυγής-αγωγής (στο εξής: προσφυγής), ακόμη και αν αυτή απορριφθεί.
 Ισχυρισμοί και κύρια επιχειρήματα
 Προς στήριξη της προσφυγής της, η προσφεύγουσα ισχυρίζεται ότι, στο πλαίσιο της διαδικασίας διαγωνισμού ENTR/05/078 — Η ΕΥΡΩΠΗ ΣΟΥ Παρτίδα 1 (εργασίες σύνταξης και μεταφράσεων) για τη διαχείριση και συντήρηση της δικτυακής πύλης «η Ευρώπη σου» (ΕΕ 2006/S 143-153057) και ENTR/05/078 — Η ΕΥΡΩΠΗ ΣΟΥ Παρτίδα 2 (διαχείριση υποδομής) για τη διαχείριση και συντήρηση της δικτυακής πύλης «η Ευρώπη σου» (ΕΕ 2006/S 143-153057), η ΓΔ Πληροφορικής της Ευρωπαϊκής Επιτροπής ως αναθέτουσα αρχή δεν συμμορφώθηκε προς τις υποχρεώσεις της που απορρέουν από τον δημοσιονομικό κανονισμό (1), τους κανόνες εφαρμογής του και την οδηγία 2004/18/ΕΚ (2), καθώς και από τις αρχές της διαφάνειας και της ίσης μεταχειρίσεως.
 Επίσης, η προσφεύγουσα διατείνεται ότι η αναθέτουσα αρχή προέβη σε ορισμένες προδήλως πεπλανημένες εκτιμήσεις, με αποτέλεσμα να απορριφθεί η προσφορά της προσφεύγουσας. Επιπροσθέτως, η αναθέτουσα αρχή παρέβη, κατά την προσφεύγουσα, την υποχρέωσή της να αιτιολογήσει την απόφασή της και, ειδικότερα, την υποχρέωση να γνωστοποιήσει στην προσφεύγουσα τα συγκριτικά πλεονεκτήματα της επιλεγείσας προσφοράς σε σχέση με την προσφορά της προσφεύγουσας.
 Η προσφεύγουσα ζητεί, συνεπώς, να ακυρωθεί η απόφαση της Ευρωπαϊκής Επιτροπής περί απορρίψεως της προσφοράς της προσφεύγουσας και αναθέσεως της εκτελέσεως της συμβάσεως στον επιλεγέντα ανάδοχο και να καταδικασθεί η καθής-εναγόμενη στην καταβολή των εξόδων στα οποία υποβλήθηκε η προσφεύγουσα στο πλαίσιο της υπό κρίση προσφυγής, ακόμη και αν η προσφυγή απορριφθεί. Επικουρικώς, αν η σύμβαση έχει ήδη εκτελεσθεί κατά τον χρόνο εκδόσεως της αποφάσεως του Πρωτοδικείου ή αν δεν είναι πλέον εφικτή η ακύρωση της προσβαλλομένης αποφάσεως, η προσφεύγουσα ζητεί, βάσει των άρθρων 235 ΕΚ και 288 ΕΚ, χρηματική αποζημίωση, ύψους 1 125 000 ευρώ όσον αφορά την παρτίδα 1 και 825 000 ευρώ όσον αφορά την παρτίδα 2,.
 (1) Κανονισμός (ΕΚ, Ευρατόμ) 1605/2002 του Συμβουλίου, της 25ης Ιουνίου 2002, για τη θέσπιση του δημοσιονομικού κανονισμού που εφαρμόζεται στον γενικό προϋπολογισμό των Ευρωπαϊκών Κοινοτήτων (ΕΕ L 248, σ. 1).
 (2) Οδηγία 2004/18/CE του Ευρωπαϊκού Κοινοβουλίου και του Συμβουλίου, της 31ης Μαρτίου 2004, περί συντονισμού των διαδικασιών σύναψης δημόσιων συμβάσεων έργων, προμηθειών και υπηρεσιών (ΕΕ L 134, σ. 114).


text:
 COMISIÓN DE LAS COMUNIDADES EUROPEAS
 C0M(91) 224 final
 Bruselas, 14 de junio de 1991
 Propuesta de
 REGLAMENTO (CEE) DEL CONSEJO
 que modifica el reglamento (CEE) n° 1307/85 por el que se autoriza a los estados
 miembros a conceder una ayuda para el consumo de mantequilla
 (presentada por la Comisión)
 ---pagebreak--- - 1 -
 EXPOSICIÓN DE MOTIVOS
 Entre 1979 y 1984-1985, la Comunidad concedió una ayuda al consumo directo de
 mantequilla al Reino Unido, Irlanda, Dinamarca y Luxemburgo. Esa ayuda se redujo
 al mismo tiempo que el precio de intervención de I a mantequilla para la campaña
 de 1984-1985 y la subvención comunitaria se suprimió totalmente a partir de la
 campaña de 1985/1986. No obstante, a fin de evitar los efectos negativos en el
 consumo del aumento de los precios de la mantequilla, se autorizó la concesión
 desde ese momento de una ayuda nacional. Dada la constante tendencia a la baja
 del consumo directo de mantequilla, se propone mantener la facultad de conceder
 una subvención nacional para la campaña de 1991-1992, proponiéndose asimismo
 mantener invariable el nivel máximo de la ayuda en 50 ecus/100 kg.
 ---pagebreak--- REGLAMENTO (CEE) n° 2901/85 DEL CONSEJO
 que modifica el reglamento (CEE) n° 1307/85 por el que se autoriza a los estados
 miembros a conceder una ayuda para el consumo de mantequilla
 EL CONSEJO DE LAS COMUNIDADES EUROPEAS,
 Visto el Tratado constitutivo de la Comunidad Económica Europea y, en partícula,
 sus artículos 42 y 43,
 Vista la propuesta de la Comisión,
 Visto el dictamen del Parlamento Europeo,^1^
 Considerando que el régimen implantado por el Reglamento (CEE) n° 1307/85^2^
 última modificación la constituye el Reglamento (CEE) n° 3232/90^ 3 ^, el cual
 autoriza a los Estados miembros a que concedan una ayuda para la mantequilla
 destinada al consumo final privado, expira al final de la campaña lechera de
 1990/91, que, con el fin de evitar un descenso del consumo de mantequilla,
 procede prorrogar el régimen de ayuda contemplado por el reglamento (CEE) n°
 1307/85 para la campaña lechera de 1991/92; que, la ayuda máxima debe permanecer
 sin cambios.
 HA ADOPTADO EL PRESENTE REGLAMENTO
 Articulo 1
 En el artículo 1del reglamento (CEE) n° 1307/85 se sustituyen los años 1990/1991
 por los años 1991/1992.
 Articulo 2
 El presente reglamento será aplicable a partir del comienzo de la campaña lechera
 de 1991/1992.
 El presente reglamento será obligatorio en todos sus elementos y directamente
 aplicable en cada estado miembro.
 Hecho en Bruselas, el
 Por el Consejo
 ( 1)
 (2) DO L 137 de 27.5.1985, p. 15
 (3) DO n° L 310 de 9.11.1990, p. 8
 ---pagebreak--- FICHE FINANCIERE
 DATE
 1. LIGNE BUDGETAIRE : Articles B1-203 et 2(4 CREDITS : 852 Mio ECU
 2. INTITULE DE LA MESURE :
 Proposition d'un règlement du Conseil modifiant le règlement (CEE) n° 1307/85 autor
 sant les Etats membres d'accorder une aide à la consommation de beurre.
 BASE JURIDIQUE Article 43 du Traité
 OBJECTIFS DE LA MESURE :
 Maintien de la faculté d'octroyer une subvention nationale à la consommation de
 beurre pour la campagne 1991/92.
 1ER IODE DE EXERCICE EN EXERCICE
 INCIDENCES FINANCIERES 12 MOIS COURS (91) SUIVANT (92)
 5.0 DEPENSES A LA CHARGE
 - DU BUDGET DES CE
 (INTERVENTIONS) m g\ igeable négligeable négl i geabIe
 - DES BUDGETS NATIONAUX
 - D'AUTRES SECTEURS
 5.1 RECETTES
 - RESSOURCES PROPRES DES CE
 (PRELEVEMENTS/DROITS DE DOUANE)
 - SUR LE PLAN NATIONAL
 1993 1994 1995 1996
 5.0.1 PREVISIONS DES DEPENSES
 5.1.1 PREVISIONS DES RECETTES
 5.2 MODE DE CALCUL
 6.0 FINANCEMENT POSSIBLE PAR CREDITS INSCRITS AU CHAPITRE CONCERNE DU BUDGET
 EN COURS D'EXECUTION OUI/NON
 6.1 FINANCEMENT POSSIBLE PAR VIREMENT ENTRE CHAPITRES DU BUDGET EN COURS
 D EXECUTION OU I/NON
 6.2 NtCESSITE D'UN BUDGET SUPPLEMENTAIRE OU i/NON
 6.3 CREDITS A SNSCRÎRE DANS LES BUDGETS FUTJRS OUI/NON
 OBSERVAT»ONS :
 La consommation de beurre est soutenue par l'aide nationale et conduit, par conséquent, à \
 un moindre besoin de subvention communautaire sur le marché. !
 Dans l'hypothèse où ie Luxembourg uniquement donne suite à cette faculté, l'eifet sui le |
 ---pagebreak--- ISSN 0257-9545
 COM(91) 224 fina!
 DOCUMENTOS
 ES 03
 N° de catálogo : CB-CO-91-269-ES-C
 ISBN 92-77-73511-2
 Oficina de Publicaciones Oficiales de las Comunidades Europeas
 1X29851 .uxemburgo


text:
 25.5.2013
 CS
 Úřední věstník Evropské unie
 C 147/27
 Žaloba podaná dne 21. března 2013 — Benelli Q.J. v. OHIM — Demharter (MOTOBI)
 (Věc T-170/13)
 2013/C 147/49
 Jazyk, ve kterém byla podána žaloba: angličtina
 Účastníci řízení
 Žalobkyně: Benelli Q.J. Srl (Pesaro, Itálie) (zástupce: P. Lukácsi, advokát)
 Žalovaný: Úřad pro harmonizaci na vnitřním trhu (ochranné známky a vzory)
 Další účastnice řízení před odvolacím senátem: Demharter GmbH (Dillingen, Německo)
 Návrhová žádání
 Žalobkyně navrhuje, aby Tribunál:
 —
 změnil rozhodnutí žalovaného a nařídil zamítnutí návrhu na zrušení podaného účastnicí řízení navrhující zrušení;
 —
 zrušil rozhodnutí žalovaného a vrátil mu věc k novému přezkoumání a novému rozhodnutí v případě, kdyby Tribunál dospěl k závěru, že je nevyhnutelné provést další hloubkový přezkum důkazu o skutečném užívání;
 —
 uložil žalovanému náhradu nákladů řízení žalobkyně.
 Žalobní důvody a hlavní argumenty
 Zapsaná ochranná známka Společenství, jež je předmětem návrhu na zrušení: Slovní ochranná známka „MOTOBI“ pro výrobky zařazené do třídy 12 — Zápis ochranné známky Společenství č. 835 264
 Majitelka ochranné známky Společenství: Žalobkyně
 Účastnice řízení navrhující zrušení ochranné známky Společenství: Další účastnice řízení před odvolacím senátem
 Rozhodnutí zrušovacího oddělení: Zrušení ochranné známky Společenství
 Rozhodnutí odvolacího senátu: Zamítnutí odvolání
 Dovolávané žalobní důvody: Porušení čl. 51 odst. 1 písm. a) nařízení Rady č. 207/2009


text:
Eds församling är en församling i Sollentuna kontrakt i Stockholms stift. Församlingen ligger i Upplands Väsby kommun i Stockholms län. Församlingen utgör ett eget pastorat.
 Administrativ historik
 Församlingen har medeltida ursprung.
 Församlingen utgjorde tidigt ett eget pastorat för att därefter till 1962 vara i ett gemensamt pastorat med Sollentuna församling, före 1 maj 1917 som moderförsamling därefter som annexförsamling. Från 1962 utgör församlingen ett eget pastorat.
 Befolkningsutveckling
 Kyrkor
 Eds kyrka
 Se även
 Eds socken
 Eds distrikt, Uppland
 Källor
 Externa länkar
 Officiell webbplats
 Församlingar i Stockholms stift
 Indelningar i Upplands Väsby kommun


text:
 12.3.2011
 HU
 Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja
 C 80/14
 A Tribunale di Palermo (Olaszország) által 2011. január 5-én benyújtott előzetes döntéshozatal iránti kérelem — Fabio Caronna elleni büntetőeljárás
 (C-7/11. sz. ügy)
 2011/C 80/26
 Az eljárás nyelve: olasz
 A kérdést előterjesztő bíróság
 Tribunale di Palermo
 Az alap-büntetőeljárás résztvevői
 Fabio Caronna
 Az előzetes döntéshozatalra előterjesztett kérdések
 1.
 Úgy kell-e érteni a[z emberi felhasználásra szánt gyógyszerek közösségi kódexéről szóló, 2001. november 6-i 2001/83/EK európai parlamenti és tanácsi irányelv (1) 77.] cikkének (2) bekezdését, hogy a gyógyszerészeknek is rendelkezniük kell engedéllyel a gyógyszerek nagykereskedelmi forgalmazására, vagy a közösségi jogalkotó célja az volt, hogy mentesítse a gyógyszerészeket ezen engedély alól, ahogyan az a (36) preambulumbekezdésből kiolvasható?
 2.
 Hogyan kell helyesen értelmezni a gyógyszerek nagykereskedelmi forgalmazásának az irányelv 76–84. cikke szerinti engedélyezésére vonatkozó szabályozást, különös tekintettel azon előírt követelményekre, amelyek szerint a gyógyszerészek (mint természetes személyek és nem mint társaságok), akik a nemzeti szabályozás alapján ilyen minőségükben már rendelkeznek gyógyszerek kiskereskedelmi értékesítésére vonatkozó engedéllyel, gyógyszerek forgalmazására is jogosultak?
 (1) HL 2001. L 311., 67. o.; magyar nyelvű különkiadás 13. fejezet, 27. kötet, 69. o.