text:
 Avis juridique important
 |
 21999D1104(01)
 Decision No 4/1999 of the EU-Poland Association Council of 4 August 1999 adopting the terms and conditions for the participation of Poland in Community programmes in the field of research, technological development and demonstration (1998 to 2002) - Joint Declaration by Poland and the Communit
 Official Journal L 281 , 04/11/1999 P. 0071 - 0078
 DECISION No 4/1999 OF THE EU-POLAND ASSOCIATION COUNCILof 4 August 1999adopting the terms and conditions for the participation of Poland in Community programmes in the field of research, technological development and demonstration (1998 to 2002)(1999/708/EC)THE ASSOCIATION COUNCIL,Having regard to the Europe Agreement establishing an association between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Poland of the other part (hereinafter referred to as "the Europe Agreement"),Having regard to the Additional Protocol to the Europe Agreement concerning Polish participation in Community programmes, and in particular Articles 1 and 2 thereof,(1) Whereas, pursuant to Article 1 of the said Additional Protocol, Poland may participate in Community framework programmes, specific programmes, projects or other Community actions, in particular in the fields of research and technological development;(2) Whereas the European Council, at its meeting in Luxembourg on 12 and 13 December 1997, called in its Conclusions for the opening of certain Community programmes (such as in the field of research) to the candidate countries, as a way of familiarising themselves with the policies and working methods of the Union, each candidate country being expected to make a steadily increasing financial contribution of its own (PHARE will, if necessary, be able to part-finance the applicant States' national contributions);(3) Whereas the aforementioned Conclusions also call for the participation of the candidate countries, as observers and for the points which concern them, in the committees assisting the Commission in the implementation of the programmes to which they contribute financially;(4) Whereas, by Decision No 182/1999/EC, the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union adopted a framework programme of the European Community for research, technological development and demonstration activities (1998 to 2002)(1), hereinafter called "the Fifth Framework Programme";(5) Whereas, according to Article 2 of the aforementioned Additional Protocol, the terms and conditions for the participation of Poland in the activities referred to in Article 1 thereof are to be decided by the Association Council,HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:Article 1Poland may participate in the specific programmes of the Fifth Framework Programme according to the terms and conditions, principles and rules set out in Annexes I, II and III respectively, which shall form an integral part of this Decision.Article 2This Decision shall apply for the duration of the Fifth Framework Programme.Article 3This Decision shall take effect after thirty days following its adoption.Done at Brussels, 4 August 1999.For the Association CouncilThe PresidentB. GEREMEK(1) OJ L 26, 1.2.1999, p. 1.ANNEX ITERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR THE PARTICIPATION OF POLAND IN THE SPECIFIC PROGRAMMES OF THE FIFTH FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME1. Research entities established in Poland may participate in all the specific programmes of the Fifth Framework Programme. Polish scientists or research entities may participate in the activities of the Joint Research Centre to the extent that such activities are not covered by the preceding sentence."Research entities" as referred to in this Decision, shall include: universities, research organisations, industrial companies, including small and medium-sized enterprises, or natural persons.2. Paragraph 1 shall imply the following:- participation of research entities established in Poland in the implementation of all specific programmes adopted under the Fifth Framework Programme, in accordance with the terms and conditions laid down in the "rules for the participation of undertakings, research centres and universities and for the dissemination of research results for the implementation of the fifth framework programme of the European Community (1998 to 2002)";- financial contribution by Poland to the budgets of the programmes adopted for the implementation of the Fifth Framework Programme on the basis of the ratio of the gross domestic product of Poland to the sum of the gross domestic product of the Member States of the European Union and that of Poland.3. Research entities established in Poland participating in Community research programmes shall, as regards ownership, exploitation and dissemination of information and intellectual property arising from such participation, have the same rights and obligations as those of research entities established in the Community, subject to the provisions of Annex II.4. The relevant subcomittee set up by the Association Council under the Europe Agreement shall, on a regular basis and at least once a year, review and evaluate the implementation of this Decision.5. The financial contribution of Poland deriving from participation in the implementation of the specific programmes shall be established in proportion to, and in addition to, the amount available each year in the general budget of the European Communities for commitment appropriations to meet the Commission's financial obligations stemming from work to be carried out in the forms necessary for the implementation, management and operation of these programmes.The proportionality factor governing the contribution of Poland shall be obtained by establishing the ratio between the gross domestic product of Poland, at market prices, and the sum of gross domestic products, at market prices, of the Member States of the European Union and Poland. This ratio shall be calculated on the basis of the latest statistical data pertaining to the same year from the Statistical Office of the European Communities (Eurostat), available at the time of publication of the preliminary draft budget of the European Communities.In order to facilitate its participation in the specific programmes, the contribution of Poland will be implemented as follows:>TABLE>The rules for financial participation by the European Community are set out in Annex IV to Decision No 182/1999/EC.The rules governing the financial contribution of Poland are set out in Annex III hereto.6. Without prejudice to point 3, research entities established in Poland participating in the Fifth Framework Programme shall have the same contractual rights and obligations as entities established in the Community, taking into account the mutual interests of the Community and Poland.For Polish research entities, the terms and conditions applicable for the submission and evaluation of proposals and those for the granting and conclusion of contracts under Community programmes shall be the same as those applicable for contracts concluded under the same programmes with research entities in the Community, taking into account the mutual interests of the Community and Poland.Polish experts shall be taken into consideration, alongside Community experts, in the selection of evaluators or experts under the Community's research and technological development and demonstration programmes and as members of the advisory groups and other consultative bodies which assist the Commission in the implementation of the Fifth Framework Programme.A Polish research entity may be coordinator of a project under the same terms and conditions applicable to entities established in the Community. In conformity with the Community's Financial Regulations, contractual arrangements concluded with, or by, Polish research entities shall provide for controls and audits to be carried out by, or under the authority of, the Commission and the Court of Auditors. Financial audits may be carried out with the purpose of controlling such entities' income and expenditures, related to the contractual obligations towards the Community. In a spirit of cooperation and mutual interest, the relevant Polish authorities shall provide any reasonable and feasible assistance as may be necessary or helpful under the circumstances to perform such controls and audits.7. The Community and Poland will make every effort, within the framework of the existing provisions, to facilitate the free movement and residence of research workers participating, in Poland and in the Community, in the activities covered by this Decision and to facilitate cross-border movement of goods intended for use in such activities.Activities covered by this Decision shall be exempt from Polish indirect taxes, customs duties, prohibitions and restrictions on imports and exports in respect of goods and services intended for use under such activities.8. Polish representatives will, for the points which concern them, participate as observers in the programme committees of the Fifth Framework Programme. These committees shall moreover meet without the presence of Polish representatives at the time of voting. Poland will be informed. Participation as referred to in this paragraph shall take the same form, including procedures for receipt of information and documentation, as that applicable to participants from Member States.9. The Community and Poland may terminate activities under this Decision at any time upon 12 months' notice in writing. Projects and activities in progress at the time of termiantion shall continue until their completion under the conditions laid down in this Decision.Should the Community decide to revise one or more Community programmes, activities under this Decision may be terminated under mutually agreed conditions. Poland shall be notified of the exact content of the revised programmes within one week of their adoption by the Community. The Community and Poland shall notify each other, within one month after the adoption of the Community decision, of any intention to terminate the activities.Where the Community adopts a new multiannual framework programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities, the Association Council may decide the terms and conditions for the participation of Poland.ANNEX IIPRINCIPLES ON THE ALLOCATION OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTSRights to intellectual property created or furnished under this Decision shall be allocated as provided in this Annex.I. ApplicationThis Annex is applicable to research carried out pursuant to this Decision (hereinafter referred to as "joint research"), except as otherwise specifically agreed by the Community and Poland (hereinafter referred to as "the parties").II. Ownership, allocation and exercise of rights1. For purposes of this Decision, "intellectual property" (hereinafter referred to as "IP") shall have the meaning given in Article 2 of the Convention establishing the World Intellectual Property Organisation, done at Stockholm on 14 July 1967.2. This Annex deals with the allocation of rights, interests and royalties of the parties and their participants. Each party and its participants shall ensure that the other party and its participants may obtain the rights to IP allocated to it in accordance with this Annex. This Annex does not otherwise alter or prejudice the allocation of rights, interests and royalties between a party and its nationals or participants, which shall be determined by the laws and practices applicable to each party.3. The following principles shall apply and be provided for in the contractual arrangements:(a) adequate protection of IP. The parties, their agencies and/or their participants, as appropriate, shall ensure that they notify one another within a reasonable time of the creation of any IP arising under this Decision or implementing arrangements and that they seek protection for such intellectual property in a timely fashion;(b) taking account of the contributions of the parties or their participants in determining the rights and interests of the parties and participants;(c) effective exploitation of results;(d) non-discriminatory treatment of participants from the other party as compared with the treatment given to its own participants;(e) protection of confidential business information.4. The participants shall jointly develop a technology management plan (TMP) in respect of the ownership and use, including publication, of information and IP to be created in the course of joint research. The indicative features of a TMP are contained in the Appendix to this Annex. The TMP shall be approved by the responsible funding agency or department of the Party involved in financing the research, before the conclusion of the specific research and development cooperation contract to which it is attached.The TMPs shall be developed taking into account the aims of the joint research, the relative financial or other contributions of the Parties or participants, the advantages and disadvantages of licensing by territory or for fields of use, requirements imposed by the applicable laws including those of the Parties concerning IP rights and other factors deemed appropriate by the participants. The rights and obligations concerning the research generated by visiting researchers in respect of IP shall also be dealt with in the joint TMPs.5. Information or IP created in the course of joint research and not dealt with in the TMP shall be allocated, with the approval of the Parties, according to the principles set out in the TMP. In case of disagreement, such information or IP shall be owned jointly by all the participants involved in the joint research from which the information or IP results. Each participant to whom this provision applies shall have the right to use such information or IP for his own commercial exploitation with no geographical limitation.6. Each party shall ensure that the other party and its participants may have the rights to IP allocated to them in accordance with these principles.7. While maintaining the conditions of competition in areas affected by this Decision, each party shall endeavour to ensure that rights acquired pursuant to this Decision and arrangements made under it are exercised in such a way as to encourage, in particular, (i) the dissemination and use of information created, disclosed or otherwise made available, under this Decision, and (ii) the adoption and implementation of international standards.8. Termination of cooperation shall not affect rights or obligations under this Annex.III. International conventionsIP belonging to the parties or to their participants shall be accorded treatment consistent with the relevant international conventions that are applicable to the parties, including the TRIPS Agreement (Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights administered by the World Trade Organisation) as well as the Berne Convention (Paris Act 1971) and the Paris Convention (Stockholm Act 1967).IV. Scientific literary worksWithout prejudice to Section V, and unless otherwise agreed in the TMP, publication of results of research shall be made jointly by the parties or participants to that joint research. Subject to the foregoing general rule, the following procedures shall apply:1. in the case of publication by a party or public bodies of that party of scientific and technical journals, articles, reports, books, including video and software arising from joint research pursuant to this Decision, the other party shall be entitled to a worldwide, non-exclusive, irrevocable, royalty-free licence to translate, reproduce, adapt, transmit and publicly distribute such works;2. the parties shall ensure that literary works of a scientific character arising from joint research pursuant to this Decision and published by independent publishers are disseminated as widely as possible;3. all copies of a copyright work to be publicly distributed and prepared under this section shall indicate the names of the author(s) of the work unless an author explicitly declines to be named. They shall also bear a clearly visible acknowledgement of the cooperative support of the parties.V. Undisclosed informationA. Documentary undisclosed information1. Each party, its agencies or its participants, as appropriate, shall identify at the earliest possible moment and preferably in the TMP the information they wish to remain undisclosed, taking into account, inter alia, the following criteria:(a) confidentiality of the information in the sense that it is not, as a body or in the precise configuration or assembly of its components, generally known among, or readily accessible by lawful means to, experts in the field;(b) the actual or potential commercial value of the information by virtue of its confidentiality;(c) previous protection of the information in the sense that it has been subject to steps that were reasonable under the circumstances by the person lawfully in control, to maintain its confidentiality.The parties, their agencies and their participants, as appropriate, may in certain cases agree that, unless otherwise indicated, parts or all of the information provided, exchanged or created in the course of joint research may not be disclosed.2. Each party shall ensure that it and its participants clearly identify undisclosed information, for example by means of an appropriate marking or restrictive legend. This also applies to any reproduction of the said information, in whole or in part.A party and a participant receiving undisclosed information shall respect the privileged nature thereof. Such respect shall automatically terminate when this information is revealed by the owner to the public domain.3. Undisclosed information communicated under this Decision may be disseminated by the receiving party or its organisation to persons within or employed by the receiving party or organisation authorised for the specific purposes of the joint research under way, provided that any undisclosed information so disseminated is pursuant to an agreement of confidentiality and readily recognisable as such, as set out above.4. With the prior written consent of the party providing undisclosed information, the receiving party may disseminate such undisclosed information more widely than otherwise permitted in paragraph 3. The parties shall cooperate in developing procedures for requesting and obtaining prior written consent for such wider dissemination, and each party will grant such approval to the extent permitted by its domestic policies, regulations and laws.B. Non-documentary undisclosed informationNon-documentary undisclosed or other confidential information provided in seminars and other meetings arranged under this Decision, or information arising from the attachment of staff, use of facilities, or joint projects, shall be treated by the parties or their participants according to the principles specified for documentary information in the Decision; this is on the understanding, however, that the recipient of such undisclosed or other confidential or privileged information was made aware of the confidential character of the information communicated at the time such communication was made.C. ControlEach party shall endeavour to ensure that undisclosed information received by it under this Decision is controlled as provided herein. If one of the parties becomes aware that it will be, or may be reasonably expected to become, unable to meet the non-dissemination provisions of sections A and B, it shall immediately inform the other party. The parties shall thereafter consult to define an appropriate course of action.AppendixIndicative features of a TMPThe TMP is a specific agreement to be concluded between the participants on the implementation of joint research and the respective rights and obligations of the participants.With respect to IP, the TMP will normally deal with, among other things, ownership, protection, user rights for research and development purposes, exploitation and dissemination, including arrangements for joint publication, the rights and obligations of visiting researchers and dispute settlement procedures. The TMP may also deal with foreground and background information, licensing and deliverables.ANNEX IIIRULES GOVERNING THE FINANCIAL CONTRIBUTION OF POLAND REFERRED TO IN PARAGRAPH 5 OF ANNEX I1. The Commission of the European Communities shall communicate to Poland, and shall inform the subcommittee referred to in paragraph 4 of Annex I of such communication, as soon as possible, and at the latest on 1 September of each financial year, the following information, together with relevant background material:- the amounts in commitment appropriations, in the statement of expenditure of the preliminary draft budget of the European Communities corresponding to the Fifth Framework Programme;- the estimated amount of the contributions derived from the preliminary draft budget, corresponding to the participation of Poland in the Fifth Framework Programme.Nonetheless, in order to facilitate internal budgetary procedures, the Commission services shall provide corresponding indicative figures at the latest on 30 May of each year.Once the general budget has been finally adopted, the Commission shall communicate to Poland, in the statement of expenditure corresponding to Poland's participation, the amounts referred to in the first subparagraph.2. The Commission shall issue, at the latest on 1 January and 15 June of each financial year, a call for funds to Poland corresponding to its contribution under this Decision. These calls for funds shall provide, respectively, for the payment:- of six-twelfths of Poland's contribution not later than 20 February, and- six-twelfths of its contribution not later than 15 July.However, the six-twelfths to be paid not later than 20 February shall be calculated on the basis of the amount set out in the statement of revenue of the preliminary draft budget: the regularisation of the amount thus paid shall occur with the payment of the six-twelfths not later than 15 July.For the first year of implementation of this Decision, the Commission shall issue a first call for funds within 30 days of its coming into effect. Should this call be issued after 15 June, it shall provide for the payment of twelve/twelfths of Poland's contribution within 30 days, calculated on the basis of the amount set out in the statement of revenue of the budget.The contribution of Poland shall be expressed and paid in euro.Poland shall pay its contribution under this Decision according to the schedule in this paragraph. Any delay in payment shall give rise to the payment of interest at a rate equal to the one-month interbank offered rate (IBOR) in euro as quoted by the International Swap Dealers' Association on the ISDA page of Reuters. This rate shall be increased by 1,5 % for each month of delay. The increased rate shall be applied to the entire period of delay. However, the interest shall be due only if the contribution is paid more than 30 days after the scheduled payment dates mentioned in this point.Travel costs incurred by Polish representatives and experts for the purposes of taking part in the work of the groups and bodies referred to in point 6 of Annex I and of the committees referred to in point 8 thereof and those involved in the implementation of the Fifth Framework Programme shall be reimbursed by the Commission on the same basis as, and in accordance with, the procedures currently in force for the representatives and experts of the Member States of the European Union.3. Poland's financial contribution to the Fifth Framework Programme in accordance with point 5 of Annex I shall normally remain unchanged for the financial year in question.The Commission, at the time of the closure of the accounts relating to each financial year (n), within the framework of the establishment of the revenue and expenditure account, shall proceed to the regularisation of the accounts with respect to the participation of Poland, taking into consideration modifications which have taken place, either by transfer, cancellations, carry-overs, decommitments, or by supplementary and amending budgets during the financial year. This regularisation shall occur at the time of the second payment for the year n + 1. Further regularisation shall occur every year until July 2006.Payment by Poland shall be credited to the Community programmes as budget receipts allocated to the appropriate budget heading in the statement of revenue of the general budget of the European Communities.The financial regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities shall apply to the management of the appropriations.4. At the latest on 31 May of each financial year (n + 1), the statement of appropriations for the Fifth Framework Programme related to the previous financial year (n), shall be prepared and transmitted to Poland for information, according to the format of the Commission's revenue and expenditure account.Joint Declaration by Poland and the CommunityThe Republic of Poland and the Community agree that, in addition to the provisions set out in this Decision of the Association Council, research programmes and activities of the Republic of Poland corresponding to those of the Fifth Framework Programme of the European Community for research, technological development and demonstration activities (1998 to 2002) should be open to research entities from the Community and that a separate exchange of letters between the Republic of Poland and the Community to that effect will take place.


type: caselaw

jurisdiction: EU

text:
20150731024616752015/C 270/172352015CJC27020150817DE01DEINFO_JUDICIAL20150521141522Rechtssache C-235/15: Vorabentscheidungsersuchen der Curte de Apel Constanţa (Rumänien), eingereicht am 21. Mai 2015 — Maria Bosneaga/Instituția Prefectului — Județul Constanța — Serviciul Public Comunitar Regim Permise de Conducere și Înmatriculare a Vehiculelor
 ---documentbreak--- C2702015DE1420120150521DE0017142152Vorabentscheidungsersuchen der Curte de Apel Constanţa (Rumänien), eingereicht am 21. Mai 2015 — Maria Bosneaga/Instituția Prefectului — Județul Constanța — Serviciul Public Comunitar Regim Permise de Conducere și Înmatriculare a Vehiculelor
 (Rechtssache C-235/15)2015/C 270/17Verfahrenssprache: Rumänisch
 Vorlegendes Gericht
 Curtea de Apel Constanţa
 Parteien
 Klägerin: Maria Bosneaga
 Beklagte: Instituția Prefectului — Județul Constanța — Serviciul Public Comunitar Regim Permise de Conducere și Înmatriculare a Vehiculelor
 Vorlagefrage
 Steht Art. 110 AEUV der Einführung — gemäß Art. 4 Buchst. d der Dringlichkeitsverordnung Nr. 9/2013 — der Verpflichtung zur Zahlung der Umweltgebühr für aus dem Gebiet der Gemeinschaft stammende gebrauchte Kraftfahrzeuge, die bei der Umschreibung des Eigentums an gebrauchten Kraftfahrzeugen anfällt, entgegen, wenn es sich um ein Kraftfahrzeug handelt, für das von einem Gericht die Erstattung der Sondersteuer für Pkw und Kraftfahrzeuge, der Umweltsteuer für Kraftfahrzeuge oder der Steuer auf Schadstoffemissionen von Kraftfahrzeugen bzw. die von diesen Steuern befreite Zulassung angeordnet wurde?


type: wikipedia

text:
Mandari é uma língua nilótica oriental falada pelo povo Mundari no Sudão do Sul, principalmente no condado de Terakeka, no estado de Equatoria Central e também no condado de Mvolo, no estado de Equatória Ocidental. Em 2014, havia cerca de 70.000 falantes de Mandari, também conhecida pelo nomes Chir, Kir, Mondari ou Shir. É intimamente relacionado à língua bari Bari e classificado como um dialeto dessa línguai em algumas fontes.
 Classificação
 Mandari faz parte do subgrupo das línguas bari que inclui bari, também nyangwara, pöju, iungyepu e kuku. O linguista Voßen trata esses dialetos como dialetos do bari., mas também usa o termo das línguas Bari para designá-los
 Escrita
 Fonologia
 Les tableaux présentent les vogais e as consoantes du mandari.
 Vogais
 Tipos de vogais
 Tipos de vogais
 O mandari, como as outras línguas nilóticas, inclusive as línguas bari, diferencia os vogais de acordo com seu lugar de articulação. Eles são pronunciados com o avanço da raiz da língua ou com a retração da mesma..
 Os vogais com avanço da raiz do idioma são , , , , .
 Os vogais de retração da raiz do idioma são , , , ,
 Consoantes
 Tons
 Mandari é uma língua tonal com 4 tons, alto, baixo, médio e alto-baixo.
 Notas
 Bibliografia
 Rainer Voßen, 1982, The Eastern Nilotes. Linguistics and Historical Reconstructions, Kölner Beiträge zur Afrikanistik n° 9, Berlin, Dietrich Reimer Verlag,
 Ligações externas
 Mundari em Omniglot
 Mundari em Ethnologue
 Mundari em Glottolog
 Mundari em Webonay
 Mundari em Omniglot.com
 Dicionário Mundari
 Mandari
 Mandari


text:
 13.4.2013
 FI
 Euroopan unionin virallinen lehti
 C 108/24
 Unionin yleisen tuomioistuimen määräys 20.2.2013 — Albergo Quattro Fontane ym. v. komissio
 (Yhdistetyt asiat T-278/00–T-280/00, T-282/00–T-286/00 ja T-288/00–T 295/00) (1)
 (Kumoamiskanne - Valtiontuet - Venetsian ja Chioggian alueella sijaitsevien yritysten sosiaaliturvamaksujen alentaminen - Päätös, jolla tukijärjestelmä todetaan yhteismarkkinoille soveltumattomaksi ja määrätään maksettujen tukien takaisin maksamisesta - Selvästi täysin perusteeton kanne)
 2013/C 108/64
 Oikeudenkäyntikieli: italia
 Asianosaiset
 Kantajat: Albergo Quattro Fontane Snc (Lido, Italia) (asia T-278/00), Comitato ”Venezia vuole vivere” (Marghera, Italia) (asiat T-278/00–T-280/00, T-282/00–T-286/00 ja T-289/00–T-295/00), Hotel Gabrielli Sandwirth SpA (Venetsia, Italia) (asia T-279/00), Astrocoop — Universale — Pulizie, manutenzioni e trasporti Soc. coop. rl (Marghera) (asia T-280/00), GE.AL.VE. Srl (Venetsia) (asia T-282/00), Metropolitan Srl (Venetsia) (asia T-283/00), Hotel Concordia Snc (Venetsia) (asia T-284/00), Manutencoop Soc. coop. rl (Bologna, Italia) (asia T-285/00), Società per l’industria alberghiera (SPLIA) (Venetsia) (asia T-286/00), Principessa Srl (Venetsia) (asia T-288/00), Albergo ristorante ”All’Angelo” Snc (Venetsia) (asia T-289/00), Albergo Saturnia Internazionale SpA (Venetsia) (asia T-290/00), Savoia e Jolanda Srl (Venetsia) (asia T-291/00), Hotels Biasutti Snc (Lido) (asia T-292/00), Ge.A.P. Srl (Venetsia) (asia T-293/00), Rialto Inn Srl (Venetsia) (asia T-294/00) ja Bonvecchiati Srl (Venetsia) (asia T-295/00) (edustaja: asianajaja A. Bianchini)
 Vastaaja: Euroopan komissio (asiamies: V. Di Bucci, avustajanaan asianajaja A. Dal Ferro)
 Oikeudenkäynnin kohde
 Vaatimus sosiaaliturvamaksujen alentamista koskevien lakien nro 30/1997 ja nro 206/1995 mukaisista Venetsian ja Chioggian alueella sijaitseviin yrityksiin kohdistuvista tukitoimenpiteistä 25.11.1999 tehdyn komission päätöksen 2000/394/EY (JO 2000, L 150, p. 50) kumoamiseksi
 Määräysosa
 1)
 Asiat T-278/00–T-280/00, T-282/00–T-286/00 ja T-288/00–T-295/00 yhdistetään määräyksen antamista varten.
 2)
 Euroopan komission esittämät oikeudenkäyntiväitteet yhdistetään.
 3)
 Kanteet hylätään selvästi täysin perusteettomina.
 4)
 Albergo Quattro Fontane Snc, Comitato ”Venezia vuole vivere”, Hotel Gabrielli Sandwirth SpA, Astrocoop — Universale — Pulizie, manutenzioni e trasporti Soc. coop. rl, GE.AL.VE. Srl, Metropolitan Srl, Hotel Concordia Snc, Manutencoop Soc. coop. rl, Società per l’industria alberghiera (SPLIA), Principessa Srl, Albergo ristorante ”All’Angelo” Snc, Albergo Saturnia Internazionale SpA, Savoia e Jolanda Srl, Hotels Biasutti Snc, Ge.A.P. Srl, Rialto Inn Srl ja Bonvecchiati Srl, vastaavat omista oikeudenkäyntikuluistaan, ja ne velvoitetaan korvaamaan Euroopan komission oikeudenkäyntikulut.
 (1) EUVL C 372, 23.12.2000.


text:
 12.6.2004
 ES
 Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea
 C 156/3
 Recurso interpuesto el 2 de abril de 2004 contra la República Helénica por la Comisión de las Comunidades Europeas
 (Asunto C-166/04)
 (2004/C 156/06)
 En el Tribunal de Justicia de las Comunidades Europeas se ha presentado el 2 de abril de 2004 un recurso contra la República Helénica formulado por la Comisión de las Comunidades Europeas, representada por la Sra. Maria Patakia y el Sr. Michel Van Beek, Consejeros Jurídicos de su Servicio Jurídico.
 La Comisión solicita al Tribunal de Justicia que:
 —
 Declare que la República Helénica ha incumplido las obligaciones que le incumben en virtud del artículo 4, apartados 1 y 2 de la Directiva 79/409/CEE, relativa a la conservación de las aves silvestres, (1) al no haber adoptado todas las medidas necesarias para establecer y aplicar un régimen jurídico coherente, específico e integrado capaz de garantizar una gestión sostenible y una protección efectiva de la Zona de Protección Especial GR2310001 «Delta de Acheloos, Laguna de Messolonghi/Aitolikon Lagoon y estuario del río Evinos e islas Echinades» a la luz de los objetivos de conservación de la citada Directiva.
 —
 Condene en costas a la República Helénica.
 Motivos y principales alegaciones
 A tenor de una reiterada jurisprudencia del Tribunal de Justicia de las Comunidades Europeas, un Estado miembro no puede alegar circunstancias ni dificultades de carácter interno para justificar su incumplimiento de las obligaciones y plazos establecidos en el Derecho comunitario.
 (1) DO L 103 de 25.4.1979, p. 1; EE 15/02, p. 125.


type: contracts

text:
 Avviż Legali Importanti
 |
 21997D0710(02)
 Official Journal L 182 , 10/07/1997 P. 0030 - 0031
 Deċiżjoni tal-Kumitat Konġunt ŻEENru 3/97tal-10 ta' Marzu 1997li temenda l-Anness II (Regolamenti tekniċi, standards, ittestjar u ċertifikazzjoni) li jinsab mal-Ftehim ŻEEIL-KUMITAT KONĠUNT ŻEEWara li kkunsidra l-Ftehim dwar iż-Żona Ekonomika Ewropea, kif aġġustat bil-Protokoll li jaġġusta l-Ftehim dwar iż-Żona Ekonomika Ewropea, hawnhekk iżjed 'l quddiem imsejjaħ il-Ftehim, u b'mod partikolari l-Artikolu 98 tiegħu,Billi l-Anness II li jinsab mal-Ftehim kien emendat bid-Deċiżjoni tal-Kumitat Konġunt ŻEE Nru 79/96 tat-13 ta' Diċembru 1996 [1];Billi d-Deċiżjoni tal-Kummissjoni 95/290/KE tas-17 ta' Lulju 1995 dwar regolament komuni tekniku għall-ħtiġiet tar-riċeviment tas-sistema ta' messaġġi bir-radju bbażata fuq art pubblika (ERMES) [2] għandha tiġi inkorporata fil-Ftehim;Billi d-Deċiżjoni tal-Kummissjoni 95/525/KE tat-28 ta' Novembru 1995 dwar regolament komuni tekniku għall-ħtiġiet ta' konnessjoni ta' apparat terminali għat-telekommunikazzjoni diġitali Ewropea mingħajr fil (DECT), applikazzjonijiet għall-profil ta' aċċess pubbliku (PAP) [3] għandha tiġi inkorporata fil-Ftehim;Billi d-Deċiżjoni tal-Kummissjoni 95/526/KE tat-28 ta' Novembru 1995 dwar regolament komuni tekniku għat-Network Integrat ta' Servizzi Diġitali (ISDN); Telefonija 3,1 kHz teleservizz, ħtiġiet ta' konnessjoni għat-terminali ta' settijiet ta' l-idejn [4] għandha tiġi inkorporata fil-Ftehim,IDDEĊIEDA DAN LI ĠEJ:Artikolu 1Il-punti li ġejjin għandhom jiddaħħlu wara l-punt 4i (Direttiva tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill 95/47/KE) fil-Kapitolu XVIII tal-Anness II li jinsab mal-Ftehim:"4j. 395 D 0290: Deċiżjoni tal-Kummissjoni 95/290/KE tas-17 ta' Lulju 1995 dwar regolament komuni tekniku għall-ħtiġiet tar-riċeviment tas-sistema ta' messaġġi bir-radju bbażata fuq art pubblika (ERMES) (ĠU L 182, tat-2.8.1995, p. 21).4k. 395 D 0525: Id-Deċiżjoni tal-Kummissjoni 95/525/KE tat-28 ta' Novembru 1995 dwar regolament komuni tekniku għall-ħtiġiet ta' konnessjoni ta' apparat terminali għat-telekommunikazzjoni diġitali Ewropea mingħajr fil (DECT), applikazzjonijiet għall-profil ta' aċċess pubbliku (PAP) (ĠU L 300, tat-13.12.1995, p. 35).4l. 395 D 0526: Id-Deċiżjoni tal-Kummissjoni 95/526/KE tat-28 ta' Novembru 1995 dwar regolament komuni tekniku għat-Network Integrat ta' Servizzi Diġitali (ISDN); Telefonija 3,1 kHz teleservizz, ħtiġiet ta' konnessjoni għat-terminali ta' settijiet ta' l-idejn (ĠU L 300, tat-13.12.1995, p. 38)."Artikolu 2It-testi tad-Deċiżjoni tal-Kummissjoni 95/290/KE, id-Deċiżjoni tal-Kummissjoni 95/525/KE u d-Deċiżjoni tal-Kummissjoni 95/526/KE fil-lingwi tal-Islanda u tan-Norveġja, li huma annessi mal-verżjonijiet tal-lingwa rispettiva ta' din id-Deċiżjoni, huma awtentiċi.Artikolu 3Din id-Deċiżjoni għandha tidħol fis-seħħ fl-1 ta' April 1997, kemm-il darba li n-notifikazzjonijiet kollha taħt l-Artikolu 103(1) tal-Ftehim ikunu intgħamlu lill-Kumitat Konġunt ŻEE.Artikolu 4Din id-Deċiżjoni għandha tiġi ppublikata fit-Taqsima ŻEE ta', u fis-Suppliment ŻEE ta', l-Ġurnal Uffiċjali tal-Komunitajiet Ewropej.Magħmul fi Brussel, fl-10 ta' Marzu 1997.Għall-Kumitat Konġunt taż-ŻEEIl-PresidentC. Day[1] ĠU L 100, tas-17.4.1997, p. 68.[2] ĠU L 182, tat-2.8.1995, p. 21.[3] ĠU L 300, tat-13.12.1995, p. 35.[4] ĠU L 300, tat-13.12.1995, p. 38.--------------------------------------------------


text:
 25.8.2014
 FR
 Journal officiel de l'Union européenne
 C 282/41
 Recours introduit le 12 juin 2014 — The Goldman Sachs Group/Commission
 (Affaire T-419/14)
 2014/C 282/54
 Langue de procédure: l'anglais
 Parties
 Partie(s) requérante(s): The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc (New York, États-Unis d’Amérique) (représentée par: W. Deselaers, J. Koponen et A. Mangiaracina, avocats)
 Partie(s) défenderesse(s): Commission
 Conclusions
 La partie requérante conclut à ce qu’il plaise au Tribunal:
 —
 annuler, totalement ou partiellement, les articles 1er, 2, 3 et 4 de la décision de la Commission C(2014) 2139, du 2 avril 2014, dans l’affaire AT.39610 — Câbles électriques, dans la mesure où ils concernent la requérante;
 —
 réduire l’amende infligée à la requérante par l’article 2 de la décision; et
 —
 condamner la Commission aux dépens de la présente procédure.
 Moyens et principaux arguments
 À l’appui du recours, la partie requérante invoque trois moyens.
 1.
 Premier moyen faisant valoir que la décision attaquée viole l’article 101 TFUE et l’article 23, paragraphe 2, du règlement (CE) no 1/2003 du Conseil du 16 décembre 2002 relatif à la mise en œuvre des règles de concurrence prévues aux articles 81 et 82 du traité (1), en ce qu’elle tient GS Group pour conjointement et solidairement responsable de l’infraction prétendument commise par Prysmian.
 2.
 Deuxième moyen faisant valoir que la décision attaquée viole l’article 2 du règlement (CE) no 1/2003 du Conseil et l’article 296 TFUE en ce qu’elle ne démontre pas à suffisance que GS Group a effectivement exercé une influence décisive sur Prysmian au cours de la période en cause.
 3.
 Troisième moyen faisant valoir que la décision attaquée viole l’article 101 TFUE et l’article 23, paragraphe 2, du règlement (CE) no 1/2003 du Conseil en ce qu’elle viole le principe de responsabilité personnelle et de présomption d’innocence.
 4.
 Quatrième moyen faisant valoir que la décision attaquée viole l’article 101 TFUE et l’article 23, paragraphe 2, du règlement (CE) no 1/2003 du Conseil en ce qu’elle viole le principe de sécurité juridique et le principe selon lequel la sanction doit être spécifique au contrevenant, puisque la Commission n’a pas affecté l’amende.
 5.
 Cinquième moyen faisant valoir que la Commission a violé les droits de la défense de la requérante (violation d’une forme procédurale substantielle), en ce que la Commission n’a pas fourni un accès à des documents essentiels en temps utile.
 6.
 Sixième moyen demandant à ce que le Tribunal accorde à GS Group le bénéfice de toute réduction d’amende infligée par la décision attaquée qui pourrait être accordée à Prysmian.
 (1) JO L 1, du 4 janvier 2003, p. 1.


text:
 27.6.2022
 GA
 Iris Oifigiúil an Aontais Eorpaigh
 C 244/26
 Breithiúnas na Cúirte Ginearálta an 6 Aibreán 2022 – an Ungáir v an Coimisiún
 (Cás T-57/21) (1)
 (“CERT agus CETFT - Caiteachas arna eisiamh ó mhaoiniú - Oibleagáid chun seiceálacha ar an láthair a mhéadú - Airteagal 35 de Rialachán Cur Chun Feidhme (AE) Uimh. 809/2014 - Stádas dlí dhoiciméid oibre an Choimisiúin - Modhanna chun an méadú ar ráta na seiceálacha ar an láthair a ríomh”)
 (2022/C 244/35)
 Teanga an cháis: an Ungáiris
 Páirtithe
 Iarratasóir: an Ungáir (ionadaithe: M. Fehér agus G. Koós, Gníomhairí)
 Cosantóir: an Coimisiún Eorpach (ionadaithe: J. Aquilina, A. Sauka agus Z. Teleki, Gníomhairí)
 Ábhar
 Trína chaingean bunaithe ar Airteagal 263 CFAE, iarrann an t-iarratasóir go ndéanfaí Cinneadh Cur Chun Feidhme (AE) 2020/1734 ón gCoimisiún an 18 Samhain 2020, lena n-eisiatar ó mhaoiniú an Aontais Eorpaigh caiteachas áirithe a thabhaíonn na Ballstáit faoin gCiste Eorpach um Ráthaíocht Talmhaíochta (CERT) agus faoin gCiste Eorpach Talmhaíochta um Fhorbairt Tuaithe (CETFT) (IO 2020, L 390, lch. 10) a neamhniú, a mhéid amháin a d’eisiaigh an Coimisiún Eorpach suim EUR 4 334 068,02 ó mhéid na cabhrach airgeadais a dheonaigh an Ciste Eorpach um Ráthaíocht Talmhaíochta (CERT) dó don bhliain airgeadais 2018 toisc nach ndearnadh líon leordhóthanach seiceálacha ar an láthair.
 An chuid oibríochtúil
 1)
 Déantar Cinneadh Cur Chun Feidhme (AE) 2020/1734 ón gCoimisiún an 18 Samhain 2020, lena n-eisiatar ó mhaoiniú an Aontais Eorpaigh caiteachas áirithe a thabhaíonn na Ballstáit faoin gCiste Eorpach um Ráthaíocht Talmhaíochta (CERT) agus faoin gCiste Eorpach Talmhaíochta um Fhorbairt Tuaithe (CETFT), a mhéid amháin a d’eisiaigh an Coimisiún Eorpach suim EUR 4 334 068,02 ó mhéid na cabhrach airgeadais a dheonaigh an Ciste Eorpach um Ráthaíocht Talmhaíochta (CERT) dó don bhliain airgeadais 2018 toisc nach ndearnadh líon leordhóthanach seiceálacha ar an láthair, a chur ar neamhní.
 2)
 Ordaítear don Choimisiún na costais a íoc.
 (1) IO C 88, 15.3.2021.


text:
è un manga yaoi scritto da Saki Aida ed illustrato da Yugi Yamada. Il titolo è il seguito di Takaga Koi Daro, dal quale riprende i medesimi personaggi ed ambientazione , focalizzandosi tuttavia sul personaggio, prima secondario, di Kyosuke Sawaragi.
 Nel 2011 manga è stato il primo volume pubblicato online da Digital Manga Guild, community di fan che con la collaborazione degli editori giapponesi e di Digital Manga Inc si occupa della diffusione di centinaia di titoli in rete; la sua pubblicazione è stata annunciata assieme ad altri due titoli di Boy's Love:
 e , quest'ultimo diffuso nel 2015 anche in Italia da Flashbook Edizioni.
 Trama
 Kyosuke Sawaragi riesce ad avere una riduzione della pena e ad uscire dal carcere prima di quanto il cognato Izumi e il nipote Makoto avessero sperato. Tuttavia, il tempo trascorso in prigione ha segnato profondamente lo yakuza che decide di troncare ogni rapporto con la malavita e condurre una vita rispettosa della legge. La sua esistenza tranquilla viene però turbata dall'incontro con Shuuya, un giovane gigolò incontrato in prigione. Questi, tornato a prostituirsi, è stato malmenato da dei mafioso per aver avuto un rapporto lavorativo con la moglie di uno di loro. Svenuto, viene soccorso da Sawaragi. Shuuya, in debito coll'ex yakuza per la protezione avuta in prigione, cerca di sdebitarsi con questi in natura, ma Kyosuke di fronte alla facilità con cui il ragazzo mercifica il proprio corpo non può che provare repulsione e dispiacere per il giovane. Decide così di insegnare al ragazzo il rispetto per se stesso, sperando che egli riesca a trovarsi da vivere in modo dignitoso. Shuuya infatti, di fronte al rifiuto di Sawaragi, decide – ormai innamoratosi dell'uomo che l'"ha raccolto dalla strada come un randagio”, decide di iniziare a vivere onestamente; mentre il suo ospite finisce via via per cadere vittima del fascino del giovane.
 Quando ormai i due sono innegabilmente legati da un forte sentimento amoroso, Shuuya viene rapito da Sone, suo aguzzino in carcere. Divenuto il giocattolo sessuale del malavitoso, è Izumi – il cognato di Sawaragi – a scoprire l'infelice condizione del ragazzo. Venuto al corrente della faccenda, Sawaragi torna da Hasumi, il suo ex-boss e fratello di sangue, per affidargli i propri cari ed andare da solo a salvare il randagio che ama. Aiutato inaspettatamente dai suoi ex-compagni mafiosi, Sawaragi riesce a liberare Shuuya; i due, messi alla prova i loro sentimenti, sono ora una coppia affiatata e dichiarata.
 Personaggi
 Kyosuke Sawaragi
 Ex-yakuza deciso a ricominciare la propria vita da zero, dopo l'esperienza in carcere. Spinto al grande passo dall'affetto che prova verso la sua famiglia, costituita da Makoto, il nipote, e Izumi, padre di questi e ragazzo-padre di cui Kyosuke è segretamente innamorato. Dopo essersi pentito, il malvivente senza scrupoli che era ha lasciato il posto ad un uomo dal passato travagliato, onesto e più saggio.
 Accoglie Shuuya nella propria casa per il fascino e la pena che gli ispira il giovane fin dal loro primo incontro; la maturazione del ragazzo e i suoi persistenti tentativi d seduzione faranno infine capitolare l'ex yakuza che, ormai affezionatosi ed innamorato, non riuscirà più a mandare via il ragazzo.
 Shuuya Kasuga
 Cresciuto con una madre assente che l'ha sempre trascurato, Shuuya fugge di casa dopo essere stato sorpreso dalla madre mentre il nuovo compagno di lei abusava del giovane. A causa dei trascorsi familiari Shuuya è cresciuto solo ed abbandonato, costretto a prostituirsi per guadagnarsi da vivere. Alla disperata ricerca di contatto e calore umani, il giovane si contenta di vivere offrendo se stesso per niente, pur di un fugace senso di protezione. Bisessuale, non riesce tuttavia a coltivare relazioni durature con le donne perché visceralmente sospettoso del genere femminile, a causa della delusione ed abbandono da parte della madre. La ricerca di una figura familiare protettiva ed affetto lo portano, infine a cercare – mosso dalla disperazione – Sawaragi, l'uomo che in prigione l'aveva colpito dimostrandogli gentilezza disinteressata.
 Izumi
 Cognato di Sawaragi e vedovo della sorella di lui, cresce difficilmente da solo il figlio di sei anni, Makoto. Ormai legato stabilmente a Shin, finisce tuttavia spesso per litigarci, a causa del carattere brusco di quest'ultimo, finendo così spesso per rifugiarsi da Kyosuke, in cerca di consiglio. Amato profondamente da Sawaragi, ha preferito rifiutare le profferte amorose del cognato per vivere con Shin, anche dopo aver consumato una notte con l'allora yakuza, nella depressione causata dal lutto.
 Makoto
 Figlio di Izumi e della defunta Chiaki e nipote di Kyosuke. Vivace e dispettoso, Makoto, sotto l'aria di bambino innocente e spensierato, è in realtà profondamente consapevole delle relazioni omosessuali dei parenti più prossimi, così finisce spesso per stupire il padre riguardo al rapporto di quest'ultimo con Shin, o lo zio, quando, per capriccio, si prende gioco dell'immaturo Shuuya per guadagnarsi l'attenzione dello zio. Shuuya, amante geloso, non può che percepire perciò il piccolo Makoto come un rivale temibile per il cuore di Kyosuke.
 Hasumi
 Ex-superiore mafioso di Sawaragi. Legato ancora a questi da un vecchio giuramento di sangue e da una sincera amicizia, ha più volte offerto protezione ai cari dell'amico, senza mai rimproverargli l'uscita dall'organizzazione.
 Titolo
 Come spiega l'autrice Saki Aida nel cap. 5, il titolo Aiso Tsukashi richiama l'espressione nel linguaggio romantico che intende un amore ormai spento, esaurito. Tuttavia, fa notare la sceneggiatrice, le stesse parole possono riferirsi, nell'ambito del teatro Kabuki, all'allontanamento volontario dell'amato, che viene scacciato dall'amante, il quale può anche ferire verbalmente il compagno, pur di evitargli la situazione di pericolo nella quale incorrerebbe frequentando ancora l'amante. Nel manga Aida rintraccia l’Aiso Tsukashi nel momento in cui, Sawaragi, ritrovato Shuuya ormai creduto scomparso, viene malamente allontanato dal ragazzo, che spera così di salvarlo dall'ira e dalla vendetta di Sone.
 Manga
 Volume
 Note
 Anime e manga yaoi


type: legislation

text:
 Avis juridique important
 |
 31993L0002
 Richtlinie 93/2/EWG des Kommission vom 28. Januar 1993 zur Änderung des Anhangs II der Richtlinie 66/402/EWG des Rates über den Verkehr mit Getreidesaatgut
 Amtsblatt Nr. L 054 vom 05/03/1993 S. 0020 - 0020 Finnische Sonderausgabe: Kapitel 3 Band 48 S. 0154 Schwedische Sonderausgabe: Kapitel 3 Band 48 S. 0154
 RICHTLINIE 93/2/EWG DER KOMMISSION vom 28. Januar 1993 zur Änderung des Anhangs II der Richtlinie 66/402/EWG des Rates über den Verkehr mit Getreidesaatgut DIE KOMMISSION DER EUROPÄISCHEN GEMEINSCHAFTEN - gestützt auf den Vertrag zur Gründung der Europäischen Wirtschaftsgemeinschaft, gestützt auf die Richtlinie 66/402/EWG des Rates vom 14. Juni 1966 über den Verkehr mit Getreidesaatgut (1), zuletzt geändert durch die Richtlinie 90/654/EWG (2), insbesondere auf Artikel 21a, in Erwägung nachstehender Gründe: Nach den neuesten wissenschaftlich-technischen Erkenntnissen besitzen bestimmte Hafersorten (Avena sativa) des Typs "Nackthafer" eine gewisse Futtereignung. Es ist jedoch nicht ohne weiteres möglich, Saatgut dieser Sorten mit einer Keimfähigkeit zu erzeugen, die der von Saatgut anderer Hafersorten in der Regel erreichten Keimfähigkeit entspricht. Mit der Richtlinie 88/506/EWG (3) erklärte die Kommission, daß es angesichts des wissenschaftlich-technischen Fortschritts zweckmässig sei, die Mindestkeimfähigkeit, die für die in Anhang II der Richtlinie 66/402/EWG genannten Hafersorten auf 85 % der reinen Körner festgesetzt ist, für Sorten des Typs "Nackthafer" auf 75 % herabzusetzen. Diese Maßnahme galt nur bis zum 31. Dezember 1992, damit weitere technische Daten zu diesen Sorten gesammelt und ausgewertet werden konnten. Diesen zusätzlichen technischen Daten zufolge ist es angezeigt, die Maßnahme unbefristet fortzusetzen. Die in dieser Richtlinie vorgesehenen Maßnahmen entsprechen der Stellungnahme des Ständigen Ausschusses für das landwirtschaftliche, gartenbauliche und forstliche Saat- und Pflanzgutwesen - HAT FOLGENDE RICHTLINIE ERLASSEN: Artikel 1 Nummer 2 Teil B Buchstabe d) des Anhangs II der Richtlinie 66/402/EWG wird wie folgt geändert: "d) für Sorten der Art Avena sativa, die amtlich als vom Typ 'Nackthafer' eingestuft sind, wird die Mindestkeimfähigkeit auf 75 % der reinen Körner herabgesetzt. Das amtliche Etikett trägt demzufolge den Hinweis 'Mindestkeimfähigkeit 75 %'." Artikel 2 (1) Die Mitgliedstaaten erlassen die erforderlichen Rechts- und Verwaltungsvorschriften, um dieser Richtlinie bis spätestens 31. Mai 1993 nachzukommen. Sie unterrichten die Kommission unverzueglich davon. Wenn die Mitgliedstaaten die Vorschriften nach Absatz 1 erlassen, so nehmen sie in diesen Vorschriften selbst oder durch einen Hinweis bei der amtlichen Veröffentlichung auf diese Richtlinie Bezug. Die Mitgliedstaaten regeln die Einzelheiten dieser Bezugnahme. (2) Die Mitgliedstaaten teilen der Kommission den Wortlaut der innerstaatlichen Rechtsvorschriften mit, die sie auf dem unter diese Richtlinie fallenden Gebiet erlassen. Artikel 3 Diese Richtlinie ist an alle Mitgliedstaaten gerichtet. Brüssel, den 28. Januar 1993 Für die Kommission René STEICHEN Mitglied der Kommission


text:
Un mercado de pescado es un mercado en el que se vende pescado y productos pesqueros. Puede estar dedicado al comercio al por mayor entre pescadores y comerciantes de pescado, o a la venta de productos de mar a consumidores particulares, o a ambas funciones. Mercados minoristas de pescado, un tipo de mercado mojado, a menudo venden también comida callejera.
 Los mercados de pescado varían en tamaño, desde pequeños puestos de pescado hasta los muy grandes, como el gran mercado de pescado de Tsukiji en la ciudad de Tokio, que mueve unas 660.000 toneladas de pescado y productos de mar al año.
 El término mercado de pescado puede referirse también al proceso mismo de comercialización de pescado en general, pero este artículo se refiere específicamente a los lugares físicos.
 Historia y desarrollo
 Los mercados de pescado eran conocidas en la antigüedad.Servían como un espacio público en donde un gran número de personas podía reunirse y hablar sobre la actualidad y la política local.
 En tanto los mariscos se descomponen rápidamente, históricamente los mercados de pescado se encuentran más a menudo en ciudades costeras. Una vez que el hielo u otros métodos simples de enfriamiento se hicieron disponibles, algunos mercados también se establecieron en grandes ciudades del interior que tenían buenas rutas comerciales hacia la costa.
 Puesto que la refrigeración y el transporte rápido se volvieron disponibles en los siglos XIX y XX, técnicamente se pueden establecer mercados de pescado en cualquier lugar. Con todo, debido a que la logística comercial moderna en general se ha alejado de las plazas y grandes mercados y se ha enfocado en puntos de venta minorista, como los supermercados, la mayoría de productos del mar en todo el mundo se venden ahora a los consumidores a través de estos lugares, como la mayoría de los demás productos alimenticios.
 En consecuencia, la mayoría de los principales mercados de pescado ahora se ocupan principalmente del comercio al por mayor, y los principales mercados minoristas de pescado existentes continúan operando tanto por razones tradicionales como comerciales. Ambos tipos de mercados de pescado son a menudo atracciones turísticas también.
 Mercados de pescado notables
 La siguiente es una lista incompleta de mercados de pescado notables. (Véase también una lista de artículos de pescadería)
 Mercados operativos
 Mercado de Toyosu, Tokio, Japón, el mercado de pescado más grande del mundo, que reemplaza al antiguo mercado de Tsukiji, tiene al menos la misma capacidad pero con una infraestructura actualizada. Se inauguró el 11 de octubre de 2018, 5 días después del cierre del de Tsukiji (con fines de transferencia).
 La Nueva Viga, Ciudad de México, México; el segundo mercado de pescado más grande del mundo. Comercialización de entre 250.000 y 550.000 toneladas de productos del mar al año.
 Mercado de pescado de Sídney, Sídney, Australia, el tercer mercado de pescado más grande del mundo por volumen vendido y el segundo más grande en términos de variedad.
 Mercamadrid, Madrid, España; el cuarto mercado de pescado más grande del mundo, comercializando unas 220.000 toneladas al año.
 Mercado de pescado de Billingsgate, Londres, Inglaterra, Reino Unido.
 Mercado de pescado de la cooperativa de Busan, Busan, Corea del Sur.
 Feskekôrka, Gotemburgo, Suecia.
 Mercado de pescado de Fulton, Nueva York, Estados Unidos.
 Mercado de pescado de Pike Place, Seattle, Washington, Estados Unidos.
 Mercado de pescado de Maine Avenue, Washington, DC, Estados Unidos.
 Mercado de mariscos de Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Isla de Hong Kong, Hong Kong .
 Mercado de pescado de Taipei, Taipei, Taiwán.
 Mercados históricos
 El mercado de pescado de Tsukiji en Tokio, Japón, era el mercado de pescado más grande del mundo y comercializaba unas 660.000 toneladas al año. Cerró el 6 de octubre de 2018 después de 83 años de funcionamiento y la mayoría de las actividades se trasladaron al nuevo mercado de Toyosu.
 Mercado de Escania, un mercado anual histórico en la península de Falsterbo
 Mercado mayorista de mariscos de Huanan en Wuhan, China. Cerró el 1 de enero de 2020, cuando ganó la atención mundial tras ser identificado como un posible punto de origen del COVID-19 y la pandemia resultante.
 Véase también
 Pesca comercial
 Sobrepesca
 Notas
 Referencias
 Bellamy JC (1843) The housekeeper's guide to the fish-market for each month of the year Issue 33171 of Goldsmiths'-Kress library of economic literature, Longman, Brown, Green & Longmans.
 Bestor TC (2004) Tsukiji: the fish market at the center of the world In PE Lilienthal, California studies, Volume 11, University of California Press, .
 Le Blanch J (2003) The Global fish market and the need for multilateral fishing disciplines In: Leonard B (ed) Overfishing: A Global Challenge, Diane Publishing, .
 Paula Mónaco Felipe (11 de abril de 2008). "La Nueva Viga, paseo marino en el DF fuera de las guías turísticas" La Jornada (Ciudad de México. Consultada el 13 de marzo de 2011.
 Crother C (2005) Catch!: A Fishmonger's Guide to Greatness Berrett-koehler Series, Berrett-Koehler Publishers, .
 Graddy K (2006) "The Fulton fish market" Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(2): 207–220.
 Kirman, Alan P. and Vriend, Nicolaas J. (2000) "Learning to be loyal: A study of the Marseille fish market". In: Domenico Delli Gatti, Mauro Gallegati, Alan P. Kirman, Interaction and market structure: essays on heterogeneity in economics, Volume 484. Springer, .
 Maniatis GC (2000) "The Organizational Setup and Functioning of the Fish Market in Tenth-Century Constantinople" Dumbarton Oaks Papers, 54: 13–42.
 Porcù Leide (2005) "Fishy business: Humor in a Sardinian fish market" International Journal of Humor Research, 18(1): 69–102.
 Sophie S and Håkan H (2009) "Behind the fish market facade" The IMP Journal, 3(1): 50–74.
 Sancar Seckiner's new book DZ Uzerine Notlar, published Dec. 2014, highlights historic connection between two important fish markets in the world :Billingsgate-Yenikapı. ISBN 978-605-4579-83-9.
 Enlaces externos
 Fish out of water: A guide to city fishmongers New York Magazine, 10 de abril de 1978.
 Minoristas por tipo de mercancía vendida
 Mercados pesqueros


text:
 29.3.2007
 HU
 Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja
 L 89/8
 AZ EGT-VEGYESBIZOTTSÁG
 142/2006 határozata
 (2006. december 8.)
 az Európai Gazdasági Térségről szóló megállapodás I. mellékletének (Állat- és növény-egészségügyi kérdések) módosításáról
 AZ EGT-VEGYESBIZOTTSÁG,
 tekintettel az Európai Gazdasági Térségről szóló megállapodás kiigazításáról szóló jegyzőkönyvvel módosított, az Európai Gazdasági Térségről szóló megállapodásra (a továbbiakban: a megállapodás) és különösen annak 98. cikkére,
 mivel:
 (1)
 A megállapodás I. mellékletét a 2006. szeptember 22-i 107/2006 EGT-vegyesbizottsági határozat (1) módosította.
 (2)
 Az egyes takarmány-adalékanyagok ideiglenes és végleges engedélyezéséről és egy már engedélyezett takarmány-adalékanyag új alkalmazásának ideiglenes engedélyezéséről szóló, 2006. május 22-i 773/2006/EK bizottsági rendeletet (2) bele kell foglalni a megállapodásba,
 A KÖVETKEZŐKÉPPEN HATÁROZOTT:
 1. cikk
 A megállapodás I. mellékletének II. fejezete az 1zzv. pontot (492/2006/EK bizottsági rendelet) követően a következő ponttal egészül ki:
 „1zzw.
 32006 R 0773: a Bizottság 2006. május 22-i 773/2006/EK rendelete az egyes takarmány-adalékanyagok ideiglenes és végleges engedélyezéséről és egy már engedélyezett takarmány-adalékanyag új alkalmazásának ideiglenes engedélyezéséről (HL L 135., 2006.5.23., 3. o.).”
 2. cikk
 A 773/2006/EK rendeletnek az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapjának EGT-kiegészítésében közzéteendő izlandi és norvég nyelvű szövege hiteles.
 3. cikk
 Ez a határozat 2006. december 9-én lép hatályba, amennyiben a megállapodás 103. cikkének (1) bekezdésében előírt összes értesítést eljuttatták az EGT-Vegyesbizottsághoz (3).
 4. cikk
 Ezt a határozatot az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapjának EGT-re vonatkozó részében és EGT-kiegészítésében kell közzétenni.
 Kelt Brüsszelben, 2006. december 8-án.
 az EGT-Vegyesbizottság részéről
 az elnök
 Oda Helen SLETNES
 (1) HL L 333., 2006.11.30., 21. o.
 (2) HL L 135., 2006.5.23., 3. o.
 (3) Alkotmányos követelmények fennállását nem jelezték.


text:
La gara a squadre (programma libero) del nuoto sincronizzato si è svolta tra il 13 e il 16 agosto 2014.
 Medaglie
 * Riserva
 Risultati
 La fase preliminare si è svolta in due fasi. La sera del 13 agosto 2014 si è svolta la prova tecnica, mentre la sera del 14 agosto si è svolta la prova libera. La finale si è svolta la sera del 16 agosto.
 Collegamenti esterni
 Squadre Libero


text:
 29.11.2018
 NL
 Publicatieblad van de Europese Unie
 L 305/23
 BESLUIT VAN HET GEMENGD COMITÉ VAN DE EER
 Nr. 56/2017
 van 17 maart 2017
 tot wijziging van bijlage II (Technische voorschriften, normen, keuring en certificatie) bij de EER-overeenkomst [2018/1820]
 HET GEMENGD COMITÉ VAN DE EER,
 Gezien de Overeenkomst betreffende de Europese Economische Ruimte (hierna „de EER-overeenkomst” genoemd), en met name artikel 98,
 Overwegende hetgeen volgt:
 (1)
 Uitvoeringsverordening (EU) 2016/1978 van de Commissie van 11 november 2016 tot goedkeuring van de basisstof zonnebloemolie overeenkomstig Verordening (EG) nr. 1107/2009 van het Europees Parlement en de Raad betreffende het op de markt brengen van gewasbeschermingsmiddelen, en tot wijziging van de bijlage bij Uitvoeringsverordening (EU) nr. 540/2011 van de Commissie (1) moet in de EER-overeenkomst worden opgenomen.
 (2)
 Bijlage II bij de EER-overeenkomst moet derhalve dienovereenkomstig worden gewijzigd,
 HEEFT HET VOLGENDE BESLUIT VASTGESTELD:
 Artikel 1
 Hoofdstuk XV van bijlage II bij de EER-overeenkomst wordt als volgt gewijzigd:
 1.
 In punt 13a (Uitvoeringsverordening (EU) nr. 540/2011 van de Commissie) wordt het volgende streepje toegevoegd:
 „—
 32016 R 1978: Uitvoeringsverordening (EU) 2016/1978 van de Commissie van 11 november 2016 (PB L 305 van 12.11.2016, blz. 23).”.
 2.
 Na punt 13zzzzzzq (Uitvoeringsverordening (EU) 2016/1429 van de Commissie) wordt het volgende punt ingevoegd:
 „13zzzzzzr.
 32016 R 1978: Uitvoeringsverordening (EU) 2016/1978 van de Commissie van 11 november 2016 tot goedkeuring van de basisstof zonnebloemolie overeenkomstig Verordening (EG) nr. 1107/2009 van het Europees Parlement en de Raad betreffende het op de markt brengen van gewasbeschermingsmiddelen, en tot wijziging van de bijlage bij Uitvoeringsverordening (EU) nr. 540/2011 van de Commissie (PB L 305 van 12.11.2016, blz. 23).”.
 Artikel 2
 De in het EER-supplement bij het Publicatieblad van de Europese Unie bekend te maken teksten in de IJslandse en de Noorse taal van Uitvoeringsverordening (EU) 2016/1978 zijn authentiek.
 Artikel 3
 Dit besluit treedt in werking op 18 maart 2017, op voorwaarde dat alle in artikel 103, lid 1, van de EER-overeenkomst bedoelde kennisgevingen hebben plaatsgevonden (*1).
 Artikel 4
 Dit besluit wordt bekendgemaakt in het EER-gedeelte van en in het EER-supplement bij het Publicatieblad van de Europese Unie.
 Gedaan te Brussel, 17 maart 2017.
 Voor het Gemengd Comité van de EER
 De voorzitter
 Claude MAERTEN
 (1) PB L 305 van 12.11.2016, blz. 23.
 (*1) Geen grondwettelijke vereisten aangegeven.


text:
 12.1.2017
 ES
 Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea
 L 8/28
 DECISIÓN DEL COMITÉ MIXTO DEL EEE
 N.o 192/2015
 de 10 de julio de 2015
 por la que se modifica el anexo XX (Medio ambiente) del Acuerdo EEE [2017/32]
 EL COMITÉ MIXTO DEL EEE,
 Visto el Acuerdo sobre el Espacio Económico Europeo, en lo sucesivo denominado «eAcuerdo EEE», y en particular su artículo 98,
 Considerando lo siguiente:
 (1)
 Debe incorporarse al Acuerdo EEE la Decisión 2014/746/UE de la Comisión, de 27 de octubre de 2014, que determina, de conformidad con la Directiva 2003/87/CE del Parlamento Europeo y del Consejo, la lista de sectores y subsectores que se consideran expuestos a un riesgo significativo de fuga de carbono durante el período 2015-2019 (1).
 (2)
 La Decisión 2014/746/UE deroga la Decisión 2010/2/UE de la Comisión (2), incorporada al Acuerdo EEE, y que, en consecuencia, debe suprimirse del mismo.
 (3)
 Procede, por tanto, modificar en consecuencia el anexo XX del Acuerdo EEE.
 HA ADOPTADO LA PRESENTE DECISIÓN:
 Artículo 1
 El texto del punto 21alb (Decisión 2010/2/UE de la Comisión) del anexo XX del Acuerdo EEE se sustituye por el texto siguiente:
 «32014 D 0746: Decisión 2014/746/UE de la Comisión, de 27 de octubre de 2014, que determina, de conformidad con la Directiva 2003/87/CE del Parlamento Europeo y del Consejo, la lista de sectores y subsectores que se consideran expuestos a un riesgo significativo de fuga de carbono durante el período 2015-2019 (DO L 308 de 29.10.2014, p. 114).».
 Artículo 2
 Los textos de la Decisión 2014/746/UE en lenguas islandesa y noruega, que se publicarán en el Suplemento EEE del Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea, son auténticos.
 Artículo 3
 La presente Decisión entrará en vigor el 11 de julio de 2015, siempre que se hayan transmitido todas las notificaciones previstas en el artículo 103, apartado 1, del Acuerdo EEE (*1).
 Artículo 4
 La presente Decisión se publicará en la sección EEE y en el Suplemento EEE del Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea.
 Hecho en Bruselas, el 10 de julio de 2015.
 Por el Comité Mixto del EEE
 El Presidente
 Atle LEIKVOLL
 (1) DO L 308 de 29.10.2014, p. 114.
 (2) DO L 1 de 5.1.2010, p. 10.
 (*1) No se han indicado preceptos constitucionales.


text:
26.10.96 IF! Euroopan yhteisöjen virallinen lehti N:o C 318/ 15
 sitäkin paremmin, kun pyydettyjen asiakirjojen, jotka ovat Kantajat väittävät, että siltä osin kuin direktiivin 2 artiklan
 prosessinjohtotoimien kohteena toisessa asiassa , esittä b kohta ja 3 artiklan a kohta koskevat beta-agonistien
 mättä jättäminen on tässä vastoin hyvän oikeudenhoidon käyttöä hoitotarkoituksiin hyväksytyissä eläinlääkkeissä,
 periaatetta . näissä säännöksissä säädetty kielto estää kantajia
 käyttämästä oikeuttaan valmistaa ja markkinoida kyseisiä
 Kantaja vetoaa lisäksi EY:n perustamissopimuksen 190 ar eläinlääkkeitä , vaikka niillä on eurooppalaisten säännösten
 tiklassa määrätyn perusteluvelvollisuuden rikkomiseen . edellyttämät asianmukaiset luvat sitä varten . Tällaisella
 puuttumisella kantajien erityisiin oikeuksiin loukataan tiet
 tyjä Euroopan yhteisöjen perustavanlaatuisia oikeuspe
 riaatteita , kuten suhteellisuusperiaatetta, oikeusvarmuuden
 ja luottamuksensuojan periaatteita sekä hyvää hallintota
 paa koskevaa periaatetta .
 Boehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica GmbH:n ja C. H. Boeh
 ringer Sohn Limited Partnershipin 9.8.1996 Euroopan Tältä osin kantajat katsovat, ettei niiden valmistamien
 unionin neuvostoa vastaan nostama kanne eläinlääkkeiden markkinoille saattamista koskeva kielto ole
 ( Asia T-125/96 ) perusteltu, vaikka ne ymmärtävätkin neuvoston ja komis
 ( 96/C 318/29 ) sion oikeutetun intressin torjua beta-agonistien laitonta
 käyttöä kasvukemikaalina . Kielto johtaa todellisuudessa
 siihen, että
 (Oikeudenkäyntikieli: englanti)
 — eläimille ei voida antaa niiden terveyden suojelun
 Boehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica GmbH ja C. H. Boehringer kannalta olennaista tuotetta;
 Sohn Limited Partnership ovat nostaneet 9.8.1996 Euroo
 pan yhteisöjen ensimmäisen oikeusasteen tuomioistuimessa — kantajat eivät enää saa käyttää laillista oikeuttaan
 kanteen Euroopan unionin neuvostoa vastaan . Kantajan markkinoida sellaisia tuotteita, joita kaikki eläinlääkärit
 edustajat ovat asianajajat Denis Waelbroeck ja Denis suosittelevat niiden turvallisuuden ja laadun vuoksi .
 Fosselard, Liederkerke Wolters Waelbroeck & Kirkpatrick ,
 prosessiosoite Luxemburgissa asianajotoimisto Arendt &
 Medernach, Rue Mathias Hardt 8— 10 , PL 39 , L-2010 Ne tavoitteet, joihin neuvosto on pyrkinyt antaessaan
 Luxembourg. riidanalaisen säädöksen, eivät oikeuta näitä seurauksia .
 Kantajat vaativat, että ensimmäisen oikeusasteen tuomio Lisäksi EY:n perustamissopimuksen 43 artiklaa on rikottu,
 istuin koska Euroopan parlamenttia on kuultu direktiivin 96/
 22/EY lopullisesta sanamuodosta huomattavasti poikkea
 vasta ehdotuksesta .
 — kumoaa 29.4.1996 annetun nevoston direktiivin 96/
 22/EY ( EYVL 1996 L 125 , s . 3 ) 1 , 2 , 3 ja 4 artiklan siltä
 osin kuin niissä kielletään beta-agonisteja sisältävien
 eläinlääkkeiden saattaminen markkinoille, jos lääkkeet
 on tarkoitettu käytettäviksi sellaisten eläinten hoitoon,
 joiden liha ja muut tuotteet on tarkoitettu ihmisravin
 noksi, ja
 Breda Fucine Meridionali SpA:n 12.8.1996 Euroopan
 — velvoittaa yhteisön , jota tässä asiassa edustaa neuvosto, yhteisöjen komissiota vastaan nostama kanne
 korvaamaan riidanalaisesta säädöksestä kantajille
 aiheutuneet vahingot, ja Asia T-126/96 )
 ( 96/C 318/30 )
 — velvoittaa neuvoston korvaamaan oikeudenkäyntiku
 lut .
 (Oikeudenkäyntikieli: italia)
 Oikeudelliset perusteet ja pääasialliset perustelut
 Breda Fucine Meridionali SpA, kotipaikka Bari ( Italia ), on
 Kantajat ovat ainoita merkittäviä direktiivissä 96/22/EY nostanut 12.8.1996 kanteen Euroopan yhteisöjen ensim
 tarkoitettujen beta-agonististen lääkkeiden valmistajia . mäisen oikeusasteen tuomioistuimessa Euroopan yhteisöjen
 Kantajien mukaan direktiivi 96/22/EY kohdistuu erityisesti komissiota vastaan . Kantajan edustajina ovat asianajajat
 niiden tuotteisiin, joiden on katsottava olleen syynä yhtei Antonio Tizzano ja Gian Michele Roberti, Napoli , ja
 sön toimielinten tällaisia tuotteita koskeviin toimenpitei prosessiosoite Brysselissä asianajotoimisto Tizzano, Place
 siin . du Grand Sablon 36 .
 Riidanalaisessa direktiivissä mainittu kielto estää nimittäin
 beta-agonistien käytön kaikenlajisten ravintoa tuottavien Kantaja vaatii, että ensimmäisen oikeusasteen tuomio
 istuin
 eläinten hengityssairauksien hoidossa . Beta-agonisteja
 voidaan direktiivin mukaan edelleen käyttää muihin yleisiin
 hoitotarkoituksiin ( esim. poikivien lehmien tocolyysin — kumoaa kokonaan tai toissijaisesti osittain ( kanteessa
 hoitoon ). mainituilla perusteilla ) Italian Breda Fucine Meridionali
 ---pagebreak--- N:o C 318/ 16 FI Euroopan yhteisöjen virallinen lehti 26.10.96
 SpA:lle myöntämiä valtion tukia koskevan 29.5.1995 perustamissopimuksen 223 artiklan 1 kohdan b alakoh
 tehdyn komission päätöksen (K ( 96 ) 1643 lopull .), dassa tarkoitetun poikkeuksen soveltamisalaan . Vuo
 den 1987 jälkeen toteutettujen varojen siirtojen voidaan
 — velvoittaa komission korvaamaan oikeudenkäyntiku puolestaan katsoa olevan emoyhtiön toteuttamia kon
 lut. sernin sisäisiä toiminnallisia ratkaisuja .
 — Perustamissopimuksen 92 artiklan 3 kohdan a ja c ala
 Oikeudelliset perusteet ja pääasialliset perustelut kohdan virheellinen soveltaminen .
 Kantajayhtiö on EFIM-konserniin kuuluva metallivalimo. Kantaja katsoo, että komissio on toiminut mainitun
 Vuoteen 1986 asti kaksi puolustusteollisuuden alan yritystä määräyksen vastaisesti arvioidessaan virheellisesti alu
 omisti konsernin osakkeet . Komissio totesi riidanalaisella
 eelliseen tervehdyttämiseen ja rakenteelliseen uudistami
 päätöksellä kantajayhtiölle myönnetyt vajtion tuet yhteis seen tähtäävät tuet sekä niiden kohdentumisen merki
 markkinoille soveltumattomiksi ja yhteisön oikeuden tyksen nimenomaan vaikeuksissa olevalle alueelle.
 vastaisiksi, sillä niistä ei ollut annettu etukäteen tietoa EY:n
 perustamissopimuksen 93 artiklan 3 kohdassa edellytetyllä
 tavalla . Komissio on tämän vuoksi päätöksellään velvoitta
 nut Italian poistamaan kyseiset tuet.
 Edellä mainitun osalta esitetään seuraavat kanneperus
 teet :
 Selvitystilassa olevan yhtiön EFIM:n ( Ente partecipazioni e
 — Menettelysääntöjen ja puolustuksen oikeuksien louk finanziamento industria manifatturiera ) Euroopan yhteisö
 kaaminen . jen komissiota vastaan 12.8.1996 nostama kanne
 (Asia T-127/96 )
 Kantajan mukaan komission ilmoituksessa menettelyn ( 96/C 318/31 )
 aloittamisesta mainittiin ainoastaan EFIM:ltä saatu
 52 miljardin liiran suuruinen rahoituserä ja valtion
 takaamat 10 miljardin liiran lainat eikä viitattu muihin (Oikeudenkäyntikieli: italia)
 oletettuihin varojen siirtoihin tai niiden toteuttamisen
 ajankohtiin . Vastaaja ei siis ollut edellä mainitussa
 ilmoituksessaan maininnut millään tavoin suoraan tai Selvitystilassa oleva yhtiö EFIM ( Ente partecipazioni e
 välillisesti lopullisessa päätöksessä suurinta osaa sovel finanziamento industria manifatturiera ), kotipaikka Roo
 tumattomiksi katsomistaan tuista . ma, on nostanut 12.8.1996 Euroopan yhteisöjen ensim
 mäisen oikeusasteen tuomioistuimessa kanteen Euroopan
 yhteisöjen komissiota vastaan . Kantajan edustajina ovat
 — Oikeusvarmuuden periaatteen ja luottamuksensuojan asianajajat Antonio Tizzano ja Gian Michele Roberti,
 periaatteen loukkaaminen, sillä viiden vuoden vanhen Napoli, ja prosessiosoite Brysselissä asianajotoimisto Tiz
 tumisajan päättymistä ei ole noudatettu . zano, Place du Grand Sablon 36 .
 Komission päätöksessä ajanjaksolle 1985—92 kohdis
 tuvat tuet katsotaan yhteismarkkinoille soveltumatto Kantaja vaatii, että ensimmäisen oikeusasteen tuomio
 miksi . Tällä tavoin komissio on katsonut yhteisön istuin
 oikeuden vastaisiksi kauan aikaa sitten tehdyt oikeustoi
 met ja syntyneet oikeussuhteet. Kantaja katsoo, ettei — kumoaa kokonaan tai toissijaisesti osittain ( kanteessa
 vastaajan olisi pitänyt tällä tavoin oikeudellisesti luon mainituilla perusteilla ) Italian Breda Fucine Meridionali
 nehtia niin pitkän aikaa sitten toteutettuja oikeustoimia SpA:lle myöntämiä valtiontukia koskevan 29.5.1995
 ja oikeussuhteita . Valtion tukia koskevissa asioissa on annetun komission päätöksen (K ( 96 ) 1643 lopull .),
 noudatettava vahvistettuja vanhentumisaikoja, jotka on
 muihin aloihin rinnastettavalla tavalla vahvistettava
 viisivuotisiksi ( yhteisöjen tuomioistuimen perussäännön — velvoittaa komission korvaamaan oikeudenkäyntiku
 lut .
 43 artikla ja asetus ( ETY) N:o 2988/74 ).
 — Perustamissopimuksen 92 artiklan 1 kohdan rikkomi Oikeudelliset perusteet ja pääasialliset perustelut
 nen .
 Oikeudelliset perusteet ja pääasialliset perustelut ovat samat
 Kyseistä määräystä on rikottu sen vuoksi , ettei komissio kuin asiassa T-126/96 , Breda Fucine Meridionali ( M.
 ole selvittänyt kyseessä olevien valtiontukien luonnetta .
 Kantaja on kokonaan jättänyt arvioimatta tukia siinä
 tosiasiallisessa tilanteessa, joka vallitsi niitä myönnettä (') Ks . tämän virallisen lehden sivu 15 .
 essä . Tältä osin korostetaan, että tuet myönnettiin ajalle,
 jolloin kantaja valmisti tuotteitaan puolustusteollisuu
 den alan tarpeisiin, ja että tuet kuuluvat tästä syystä


text:
 Fontos jogi nyilatkozat
 |
 21980A1017(01)
 Hivatalos Lap L 275 , 18/10/1980 o. 0014 - 0019 finn különkiadás fejezet 3 kötet 12 o. 0148 svéd különkiadás fejezet 3 kötet 12 o. 0148 görög különkiadás: fejezet 11 kötet 22 o. 0004 spanyol különkiadás fejezet 03 kötet 19 o. 0103 portugál különkiadás fejezet 03 kötet 19 o. 0103
 Megállapodáslevélváltás formájában az Európai Gazdasági Közösség és az Argentin Köztársaság között a birka- és bárányhús kereskedelméről1. sz. levélUram!Megtiszteltetés számomra, hogy hivatkozhatok a küldöttségeink között nemrégiben azzal a céllal folytatott tárgyalásokra, hogy megállapodásokat dolgozzunk ki az Argentínából származó birka-, bárány- és kecskehúsnak az Európai Gazdasági Közösségbe irányuló behozatalára vonatkozóan, a birka- és a kecskehús-piac közös szervezésének Közösség általi végrehajtásával kapcsolatban.E tárgyalások során a Felek a következőkben állapodtak meg:1. Ez a megállapodás a következőkre vonatkozik:- birka-, bárány- vagy kecskehús frissen vagy hűtve (02.01 A IV a)),- birka-, bárány- vagy kecskehús fagyasztva (02.01 A IV b)).2. E megállapodás szerint az Argentínából a Közösségbe irányuló birka-, bárány- és kecskehús exportlehetőségeket a következő éves mennyiségben rögzítik: 20000 tonna, hasított súlyban [1] kifejezve.A megállapodás megfelelő működésének biztosítása érdekében, Argentína vállalja, hogy megfelelő eljárásokat hajt végre annak biztosítása érdekében, hogy a ténylegesen kivitt éves mennyiség ne haladja meg az elfogadott mennyiséget, és a hagyományos kiszerelési mintáknak megfelelően (fagyasztva vagy hűtve) kerüljön kivitelre.Amennyiben a technológia és a kereskedelem változásai lehetővé teszik a kereskedelem kiszerelési struktúrájának módosítását, e rendelkezés felei az ilyen jellegű módosítás előtt konzultálnak egymással a 10. záradékban említett bizottságban a megfelelő megoldás megtalálása érdekében.3. Amennyiben a Közösség a védzáradékhoz folyamodik, vállalja, hogy ez nem érinti Argentínának az e megállapodásban előírt Közösségbe való bejutását.4. Ha egy évben a bevitelek meghaladják az elfogadott mennyiségeket, a Közösség fenntartja a jogot, hogy felfüggessze az Argentínából származó behozatalokat az adott év fennmaradó részére. A leszállított többletmennyiségeket be kell számítani Argentína következő évi kiviteli jogosultságába.5. A Közösség vállalja, hogy az e megállapodás hatálya alá tartozó termékek behozatalára alkalmazandó lefölözést legfeljebb az érték szerinti 10 %-os összegre korlátozza.6. Új tagállamok csatlakozásakor a Közösség – Argentínával konzultálva – megváltoztatja a (2) bekezdésben rögzített mennyiségeket, Argentína egyes új tagállamokkal folytatott kereskedelmének megfelelően.Az említett új tagállamokba irányuló bevitelekre alkalmazandó díjakat a csatlakozási szerződés szabályainak megfelelően rögzítik; figyelembe veszik az e megállapodás 5. pontjában megállapított legmagasabb lefölözési szintet.A fenti 2. pontban említett teljes mennyiséget 23000 tonnában rögzítik hasított súlyban kifejezve Görögország Közösséghez való csatlakozásának időpontjától kezdődően.7. A Közösség törekszik arra, hogy elkerülje az olyan piaci fejleményeket, amelyek hátrányosan érinthetik az Argentínából származó birka- és bárányhús közösségi piacon való értékesítését az elfogadott mennyiségek határain belül. A Közösség különösen lépéseket tesz annak biztosítása érdekében, hogy a rendelet működéséből származó fagyasztott intervenciós készlet értékesítése ne érintse hátrányosan az Argentínából származó birka- és bárányhús értékesítését.8. E megállapodás céljait és rendelkezéseit figyelembe véve, a Közösség egyetért, hogy a visszatérítések tényleges végrehajtását vagy az egyéb támogatási formákat a birkahús, bárányhús, valamint a vágásra szánt élő birka és bárány kivitele tekintetében csak azokon az árakon és feltételek mellett alkalmazzák, amelyek megfelelnek a fennálló nemzetközi kötelezettségeknek, tiszteletben tartva a Közösség hagyományos részesedését e termékek kiviteli világkereskedelmében. Ezeket az előírásokat úgy kell értelmezni, hogy megfeleljenek a GATT XVI. cikkének, és összhangban legyenek különösen az Általános Vám- és Kereskedelmi Egyezmény VI., XVI. és XXIII. cikkének értelmezéséről és alkalmazásáról szóló megállapodás 10. cikke (2) bekezdésének c) pontjával.9. Argentína biztosítja e megállapodás betartását, különösen azzal, hogy az (1) bekezdésben említett termékekre kiviteli engedélyt állítanak ki az e megállapodás hatálya alá tartozó mennyiségek határain belül.A Közösség a maga részéről vállalja, hogy elfogad minden ahhoz szükséges rendelkezést, hogy behozatali engedélyt állítsanak ki a fent említett, Argentínából származó termékekre, az argentin kormány által kijelölt illetékes hatóság által kiállított kiviteli engedély bemutatásától függően.Az e rendszer alkalmazására vonatkozó részletes szabályokat olyan módon kell megállapítani, hogy ne legyen szükség biztosíték letételére a kérdéses termékekre vonatkozó behozatali engedély kiállításához.Ezek a részletes alkalmazási szabályok azt is előírják, hogy az illetékes argentin hatóság rendszeresen közli a Közösség illetékes hatóságával azokat a mennyiségeket, amelyek tekintetében kiviteli engedélyeket állítanak ki, adott esetben a rendeltetési hely szerinti lebontásban.10. A Közösség és Argentína képviselőiből tanácsadó bizottságot állítanak fel. A bizottság biztosítja a megállapodás megfelelő alkalmazását és zökkenőmentesen működését. Rendszeresen vizsgálja a két Fél birka-, bárány- és kecskehús piacainak alakulását és a nemzetközi piac alakulását, valamint e piacok értékesítési feltételeit, beleértve az e megállapodás 7. pontjában előírt célra vonatkozókat.A bizottság biztosítja, hogy a megállapodás megfelelő alkalmazása ne érintse a megállapodás hatálya alá nem tartozó vámtarifaszámmal rendelkező, Közösségbe irányuló birka-, bárány- és kecskehús alapú termékek kivitelét.A bizottság megvitatja a megállapodás alkalmazása során esetleg felmerülő kérdéseket, és megfelelő megoldásokat ajánl az illetékes hatóságoknak.11. Az e megállapodás rendelkezéseit a Felek GATT szerinti jogainak és kötelezettségeinek sérelme nélkül fogadják el.12. A 2. pontban rögzített éves mennyiség a január 1-jétől december 31-ig tartó időszakra vonatkozik. Az e megállapodás végrehajtásától a következő év január 1-jéig alkalmazandó mennyiséget az éves mennyiséggel arányosan és a kereskedelem szezonális jellegét figyelembe véve kell rögzíteni.13. Ezt a megállapodást egyrészről azokon a területeken kell alkalmazni, ahol az Európai Gazdasági Közösséget létrehozó szerződést alkalmazandó, az abban a szerződésben meghatározott feltételekkel, másrészről az Argentin Köztársaság területén.14. A megállapodás 1980. október 20-án lép hatályba.1984. március 31-ig hatályos, és ezt követően addig marad hatályban, amíg valamelyik felmondási joggal rendelkező fél egy éves felmondási idővel írásban fel nem mondja. E megállapodás rendelkezéseit a két fél 1984. április 1-je előtt felülvizsgálja az általuk szükségesnek ítélt kiigazítások elvégezése érdekében.Lekötelezne, ha megerősítené azt, hogy Kormánya egyetért-e a fentiekkel.Kérem, Uram, fogadja megkülönböztetett nagyrabecsülésem kifejezését.az Európai Közösségek Tanácsának részéről2. sz. levélUram!Megtiszteltetés számomra, hogy igazolhatom mai levelének kézhezvételét, amely a következőképpen szól:"Megtiszteltetés számomra, hogy hivatkozhatok a küldöttségeink között nemrégiben azzal a céllal folytatott tárgyalásokra, hogy megállapodásokat dolgozzunk ki az Argentínából származó birka-, bárány- és kecskehúsnak az Európai Gazdasági Közösségbe irányuló behozatalára vonatkozóan, a birka- és a kecskehús-piac közös szervezésének Közösség általi végrehajtásával kapcsolatban.E tárgyalások során a Felek a következőkben állapodtak meg:1. Ez a megállapodás a következőkre vonatkozik:- birka-, bárány- vagy kecskehús frissen vagy hűtve (02.01 A IV a)),- birka-, bárány- vagy kecskehús fagyasztva (02.01 A IV b)).2. E megállapodás szerint az Argentínából a Közösségbe irányuló birka-, bárány- és kecskehús exportlehetőségeket a következő éves mennyiségben rögzítik: 20000 tonna, hasított súlyban [2] kifejezve.A megállapodás megfelelő működésének biztosítása érdekében, Argentína vállalja, hogy megfelelő eljárásokat hajt végre annak biztosítása érdekében, hogy a ténylegesen kivitt éves mennyiség ne haladja meg az elfogadott mennyiséget, és a hagyományos kiszerelési mintáknak megfelelően (fagyasztva vagy hűtve) kerüljön kivitelre.Amennyiben a technológia és a kereskedelem változásai lehetővé teszik a kereskedelem kiszerelési struktúrájának módosítását, e megállapodás felei az ilyen jellegű módosítás előtt konzultálnak egymással a 10. záradékban említett bizottságban a megfelelő megoldás megtalálása érdekében.3. Amennyiben a Közösség a védzáradékhoz folyamodik, vállalja, hogy ez nem érinti Argentínának az e megállapodásban előírt Közösségbe való bejutását.4. Ha egy évben a bevitelek meghaladják az elfogadott mennyiségeket, a Közösség fenntartja a jogot, hogy felfüggessze az Argentínából származó behozatalokat az adott év fennmaradó részére. A leszállított többletmennyiségeket be kell számítani Argentína következő évi kiviteli jogosultságába.5. A Közösség vállalja, hogy az e megállapodás hatálya alá tartozó termékek behozatalára alkalmazandó lefölözést legfeljebb az érték szerinti 10 %-os összegre korlátozza.6. Új tagállamok csatlakozásakor a Közösség – Argentínával konzultálva – megváltoztatja a (2) bekezdésben rögzített mennyiségeket, Argentína egyes új tagállamokkal folytatott kereskedelmének megfelelően.Az említett új tagállamokba irányuló bevitelekre alkalmazandó díjakat a csatlakozási szerződés szabályainak megfelelően rögzítik; figyelembe veszik az e megállapodás 5. pontjában megállapított legmagasabb lefölözési szintet.A fenti 2. pontban említett teljes mennyiséget 23000 tonnában rögzítik hasított súlyban kifejezve Görögország Közösséghez való csatlakozásának időpontjától kezdődően.7. A Közösség törekszik arra, hogy elkerülje az olyan piaci fejleményeket, amelyek hátrányosan érinthetik az Argentínából származó birka- és bárányhús közösségi piacon való értékesítését az elfogadott mennyiségek határain belül. A Közösség különösen lépéseket tesz annak biztosítása érdekében, hogy a rendelet működéséből származó fagyasztott intervenciós készlet értékesítése ne érintse hátrányosan az Argentínából származó birka- és bárányhús értékesítését.8. E megállapodás céljait és rendelkezéseit figyelembe véve, a Közösség egyetért, hogy a visszatérítések tényleges végrehajtását vagy az egyéb támogatási formákat a birkahús, bárányhús, valamint a vágásra szánt élő birka és bárány kivitele tekintetében csak azokon az árakon és feltételek mellett alkalmazzák, amelyek megfelelnek a fennálló nemzetközi kötelezettségeknek, tiszteletben tartva a Közösség hagyományos részesedését e termékek kiviteli világkereskedelmében. Ezek az előírásokat úgy kell értelmezni, hogy megfeleljenek a GATT XVI. cikkének, és összhangban legyenek különösen az Általános Vám- és Kereskedelmi Egyezmény VI., XVI. és XXIII. cikkének értelmezéséről és alkalmazásáról szóló megállapodás 10. cikke (2) bekezdésének c) pontjával.9. Argentína biztosítja e megállapodás betartását, különösen azzal, hogy az (1) bekezdésben említett termékekre kiviteli engedélyt állítanak ki az e megállapodás hatálya alá tartozó mennyiségek határain belül.A Közösség a maga részéről vállalja, hogy elfogad minden ahhoz szükséges rendelkezést, hogy behozatali engedélyt állítsanak ki a fent említett, Argentínából származó termékekre, az argentin kormány által kijelölt illetékes hatóság által kiállított kiviteli engedély bemutatásától függően.Az e rendszer alkalmazására vonatkozó részletes szabályokat olyan módon kell megállapítani, hogy ne legyen szükség biztosíték letételére a kérdéses termékekre vonatkozó behozatali engedély kiállításához.Ezek a részletes alkalmazási szabályok azt is előírják, hogy az illetékes argentin hatóság rendszeresen közli a Közösség illetékes hatóságával azokat a mennyiségeket, amelyek tekintetében kiviteli engedélyeket állítanak ki, adott esetben rendeltetési hely szerinti lebontásban.10. A Közösség és Argentína képviselőiből tanácsadó bizottságot állítanak fel. A bizottság biztosítja a megállapodás megfelelő alkalmazását és zökkenőmentesen működését. Rendszeresen vizsgálja a két Fél birka-, bárány- és kecskehús piacainak alakulását és a nemzetközi piac alakulását, valamint e piacok értékesítési feltételeit, beleértve az e megállapodás 7. pontjában előírt célra vonatkozókat.A bizottság biztosítja, hogy a megállapodás megfelelő alkalmazása ne érintse a megállapodás hatálya alá nem tartozó vámtarifaszámmal rendelkező, Közösségbe irányuló birka-, bárány- és kecskehús alapú termékek kivitelét.A bizottság megvitatja a megállapodás alkalmazása során esetleg felmerülő kérdéseket, és megfelelő megoldásokat ajánl az illetékes hatóságoknak.11. Az e megállapodás rendelkezéseit a Felek GATT szerinti jogainak és kötelezettségeinek sérelme nélkül fogadják el.12. A 2. pontban rögzített éves mennyiség a január 1-jétől december 31-ig tartó időszakra vonatkozik. Az e megállapodás végrehajtásától kezdődően a következő év január 1-jéig alkalmazandó mennyiséget az éves mennyiséggel arányosan és a kereskedelem szezonális jellegét figyelembe véve kell rögzíteni.13. Ezt a megállapodást egyrészről azokon a területeken kell alkalmazni, ahol az Európai Gazdasági Közösséget létrehozó szerződést alkalmazandó, az abban a szerződésben meghatározott feltételekkel, másrészről az Argentin Köztársaság területén.14. A megállapodás 1980. október 20-án lép hatályba.1984. március 31-ig hatályos, és ezt követően addig marad hatályban, amíg valamelyik felmondási joggal rendelkező fél egy éves felmondási idővel írásban fel nem mondja. E megállapodás rendelkezéseit a két fél 1984. április 1-je előtt felülvizsgálja az általuk szükségesnek ítélt kiigazítások elvégezése érdekében.Lekötelezne, ha megerősítené azt, hogy Kormánya egyetért-e a fentiekkel."Megtiszteltetés számomra, hogy megerősíthetem: Kormányom egyetért az Ön levelében foglaltakkal.Kérem, Uram, fogadja megkülönböztetett nagyrabecsülésem kifejezését.az Argentin Köztársaság Kormánya részéről[1] Hasított súly (a csontos húsnak megfelelő tömeg). Ez a kifejezés az így kiszerelt csontos hús tömegét, valamint egy együtthatóval csontos hús tömegévé átváltott kicsontozott hús tömegét jelenti. Ennek alkalmazásában 55 kg kicsontozott birkahús 100 kg csontos birkahúsnak, és 60 kg kicsontozott bárányhús pedig 100 kg csontos bárányhúsnak felel meg.[2] Hasított súly (a csontos húsnak megfelelő tömeg). Ez a kifejezés az így kiszerelt csontos hús tömegét, valamint egy együtthatóval csontos hús tömegévé átváltott kicsontozott hús tömegét jelenti. Ennek alkalmazásában 55 kg kicsontozott birkahús 100 kg csontos birkahúsnak, és 60 kg kicsontozott bárányhús pedig 100 kg csontos bárányhúsnak felel meg.--------------------------------------------------


text:
 27.1.2017
 SK
 Úradný vestník Európskej únie
 L 22/54
 VYKONÁVACIE NARIADENIE KOMISIE (EÚ) 2017/142
 z 26. januára 2017,
 ktorým sa dvestopäťdesiaty ôsmykrát mení nariadenie Rady (ES) č. 881/2002, ktoré ukladá niektoré špecifické obmedzujúce opatrenia namierené proti niektorým osobám a subjektom spojeným s organizáciami ISIL (Dá'iš) a al-Káida
 EURÓPSKA KOMISIA,
 so zreteľom na Zmluvu o fungovaní Európskej únie,
 so zreteľom na nariadenie Rady (ES) č. 881/2002 z 27. mája 2002, ktoré ukladá niektoré špecifické obmedzujúce opatrenia namierené proti niektorým osobám a subjektom spojeným s organizáciami ISIL (Dá'iš) a al-Káida (1), a najmä na jeho článok 7 ods. 1 písm. a) a článok 7a ods. 5,
 keďže:
 (1)
 V prílohe I k nariadeniu (ES) č. 881/2002 sa uvádza zoznam osôb, skupín a subjektov, na ktoré sa podľa uvedeného nariadenia vzťahuje zmrazenie finančných prostriedkov a hospodárskych zdrojov.
 (2)
 Dňa 19. januára 2017 sankčný výbor Bezpečnostnej rady OSN rozhodol o zmenení jedného záznamu v zozname osôb, skupín a subjektov, na ktoré by sa malo vzťahovať zmrazenie finančných prostriedkov a hospodárskych zdrojov. Príloha I k nariadeniu (ES) č. 881/2002 by sa preto mala zodpovedajúcim spôsobom zmeniť,
 PRIJALA TOTO NARIADENIE:
 Článok 1
 Príloha I k nariadeniu (ES) č. 881/2002 sa týmto mení v súlade s prílohou k tomuto nariadeniu.
 Článok 2
 Toto nariadenie nadobúda účinnosť dňom nasledujúcim po jeho uverejnení v Úradnom vestníku Európskej únie.
 Toto nariadenie je záväzné v celom rozsahu a priamo uplatniteľné vo všetkých členských štátoch.
 V Bruseli 26. januára 2017
 Za Komisiu
 v mene predsedu
 riaditeľ Útvaru pre nástroje zahraničnej politiky
 (1) Ú. v. ES L 139, 29.5.2002, s. 9.
 PRÍLOHA
 V prílohe I k nariadeniu (ES) č. 881/2002 sa pod nadpisom „Fyzické osoby“ identifikačné údaje pre tento záznam nahrádzajú takto:
 „Malik Muhammad Ishaq (alias: Malik Ishaq). Adresa: Pakistan. Dátum narodenia: približne 1959. Miesto narodenia: Rahim Yar Khan, provincia Pandžáb, Pakistan. Štátna príslušnosť: Pakistan. Ďalšie informácie: a) fyzický opis: mocnej postavy s očami čiernej farby, vlasmi čiernej farby a strednohnedej farby pleti s dlhou hustou čiernou bradou; b) fotografia je k dispozícii na zaradenie do osobitného oznámenia Bezpečnostnej rady OSN – INTERPOLU. Dátum zaradenia do zoznamu podľa článku 2a ods. 4 písm. b): 14.3.2014.“ sa nahrádza takto:
 „Malik Muhammad Ishaq (alias: Malik Ishaq). Adresa: Pakistan. Dátum narodenia: približne 1959. Miesto narodenia: Rahim Yar Khan, provincia Pandžáb, Pakistan. Štátna príslušnosť: Pakistan. Ďalšie informácie: a) fyzický opis: mocnej postavy s očami čiernej farby, vlasmi čiernej farby a strednohnedej farby pleti s dlhou hustou čiernou bradou; b) fotografia je k dispozícii na zaradenie do osobitného oznámenia Bezpečnostnej rady OSN – INTERPOLU. Zomrel násilnou smrťou 28.7.2015 v Pakistane. Dátum zaradenia do zoznamu podľa článku 7d ods. 2 písm. i): 14.3.2014.“


text:
Dan Lacey ( December 15, 1960 – February 7, 2022) was an American painter born in Brooklyn, New York, who was the self-described "Painter of Pancakes". His work commonly features popular culture icons (including Kanye West, Stephen Colbert, Michael Jackson, and Prince), politicians (including Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, Donald Trump, Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, Bernie Sanders and Sarah Palin), and Internet memes, most notably, related to pancakes and cats.
 Lacey's work has been widely featured in print news, social media and television shows. Barack Obama and Prince were the frequent subjects in his works.
 Lacey died from brain cancer on February 7, 2022, at the age of 61.
 Notable works
 Nude Justin Bieber painting owned by Macklemore.
 References
 1960s births
 2022 deaths
 Year of birth missing
 Place of birth missing
 21st-century American painters
 21st-century American male artists
 American male painters
 Painters from New York City
 Deaths from brain tumor
 People from New York City