text:
153 komentarai. Leave new
 Nesuprantu,ar tas gyvenimas mums duotas pakankamai sunkus ar mes taip sutirštiname spalvas ir puolame į depresiją.TAS AMŽINAS SAVĘS IEŠKOJIMAS IR SURADIMAS DAUGIAU PRIEŠŲ NEI DRAUGŲ VARO Į NEVILTĮ.Gal aš pati kažką darau ne taip/
 myliu oziaragius
 2011/05/25 22:49
 sitas zenklas pats geriausias is visu, pati esu liutas, o mama bei keletas draugu oziaragiai, be galo myliu oziaragius, tai zmones, kurie tarsi uzburia, pririsa kitus prie saves, nors su jais ir kyla daug rimtu konfliktu, taciau nemyleti oziaragio neimanoma, tai labai darbstus, kilniasirdiski zmones, visuomet pades, nepaliks nelaimeje, taciau ju gyvenimas be galo sunkus ir nelaimingas, be galo daug nepelnytu isbandymu ir neteisybes, tu gali oziaragi ziauriai iskaudinti, netgi suzeisti, o jis tau atleis bet kokia skriauda, atsuks kita skruosta, tai tiesiog sventi zmones, kuriems svarbiausi kiti, galbut del to jiems taip ir nesiseka.
 2011/06/11 14:35
 Idealiai mane apibūdina! 🙂
 2011/06/21 11:11
 Pas oziaragius ispudinga ilgalaike atmintis. Man 29 metai, o as save puikiai prisimenu 6-riu. Altruistiski.
 ožiaragytė
 2011/07/12 10:39
 O Jūs žinojot, kad pasaulį valdo ožiaragiai (Jų yra daugiausia) ? 🙂
 2011/07/16 12:08
 Ne nezinojau, kad oziaragiai valdo pasauli, nes ju yra daugiausiai 😀 Beje man viskas atitiko ka cia parase apie mane. 😀
 2011/08/10 14:42
 pofka sako:
 2010 05 24 22:12
 na ir jus lengvatikiai povelniu pasiskaitai komentarus atrodo kad tikit viesuo kad parasyti . oi atsipasau... jums tai tinka kas parasyta . tff neprisistacaiu kaip deramai atsiprasau esu oziaragis . na prie semes. Visi mes atsirenkame kas parasyta kas TINKA MAN. ta ir paastinu. mazdaug ak as siekiu materialiniu verybiu, karjeros, esu delikatus, – as oziaragis . tai yra pabreziama sie akcentai. pasimi tai kas tau cia yra parasyta. na netikit? na paimkit kita zodijako zenkla perskaitykit ir zinoma is ten tiks jumm kazkas hmmm tada gal as neozeragis o maisytas su avinu ?..............
 tada maziau tikekite ka sako kiti, ar kas cia parasyta. o galvokite savo galva. nes kekvienas esame savo gyvenimo kabvis ir mum jokia astrologija nepasakys kas mes busime ar kodel tokie esme...
 NESVARBU IS KUR ATEJAI SVARBU KUR EINI
 Teisingai pasakyta-kiekvienas esam savo gyvenimo kalvis.Todel mes kiekvienas ir pasirenkam kuo tiket ir kuo ne.Vienas galbut tiki Dievu,kitas astrologija,o trecias tik savim paciu...ir tai kiekvieno asmeninis pasirinkimas!!ir vadinti kitus lengvatikiais,tik todel,kad jie tiki tuo,kuo tu netiki-yra savo asmenines nuomones pirsimas.Mes gyvenime gaunam tai,kuo tikim.As galbut tikiu horoskopais-todel man jie atitinka,tu netiki-tau neatitinka,kitas gal but tiki dar kazkuo-ir gauna tai.Zmones reikia priimti tokius,kokie jie yra,o ne kritikuoti uz tai,kad jie nera tokie kaip tu.Tuom mes ir esam idomus vieni kitiems-nes esam skirtingi!!
 Evelinutyte
 2011/08/20 17:30
 Sakoma čia, jog Ožiaragiai būna tikri melancholikai. Iš esmės, nesutinku. Melancholikai jie būna tik viduje, o išorėje jie atrodo patys didžiausi Flegmatikai. Bendraudami su žmonėmis jie būna tikri Optimistai, aš pavyzdžiui negaliu palikti žmogaus be paslaugos, negaliu palikti žmogaus bėdoje.
 Dar dėl taupumo nesutinku, esu labai išlaidi, gaudama pinigus į rankas juos išleidžiu, viena kartą geriems dalykams, kitą kartą savo malonumui.
 Esu linkusi nuspėti savo bei kitų ateitį.
 Vieni ožiaragiai būna kupini energijos ir linksmi, kiti užsiskendę. Labiausiai tai priklauso kokį mėnesį ir dieną Ožiaragis yra gimęs. Nes būtent vieni gali tapti mąstytojais, kiti teisininkais.
 2011/09/27 07:01
 Šaunu. Visi pagrindiniai bruožai- kaip pirštu į akį. Man – arba viskas arba nieko. Neretai atiduočiau viską. Žinoma, to pelniusiam. Draugų turiu, draugės- ne. Žuvis mane išdavė. Keršto nesiekiu, nors...... Virš trijų dešimtmečių siekiu savo išsvajotos Svarstyklėlės, deja, matau, viltys mane apleidžia. Nesu jaunuolis, o širdis dar taip daužosi...Sakau, gal rastųsi kokia “dūšelė paklydėlė”, nusiteikusi susieti savo likimą su užsispyrusiu Ožiaragiu. Tai, manau, turėtų būti liekna, iki 50-ties miela lietuvaitė. Tam atvejui- tel.- 8*686*93479. Sakau, gal... Na, jei likimas lieps, paklusiu jam.
 2011/10/11 08:49
 visa tiesa apie mane 100%
 2011/12/02 15:05
 kartais ce idomu o kartais ir ne . bet kai neturi ka weikt tai visaj idomu paskaitinet.
 Dar niekas nepaminejo (bent jau tiesiai sviesiai) jog kas nors is oziaragiu jaudintusi pries kiekviena zinksni ir lyg ir gedytusi to ko daro kol pamato kad bereikalo. Gal yra kam panasiai kaip ir man? Lauksiu atsakymo 🙂
 2011/12/10 10:28
 Aš gimiau Sausio 17d tai ten kas parašyta tai viskas teisa!!!!!!
 Sveiki visi ožiaragiai ir prijaučiantis jiems:)))daug kas patinka bei atitinka,esu gimęs Sausio 16d.nepatinka tai,kad mes tikrai gimstame truputi senukais,bet tame yra ir daug privalumu:)))kas dėl darymo,drovumo,kuklumo,baimės tai visko pasitaiko daug kas priklauso ir nuo pačios asmenybės-augimo pvz:vietovės,kultūros,draugų,šeimos,kur augai ir pan., šiaip kol šių minėtu teiginių neperžengi ir nenugali tol ir neišsiaiškini,kas tau tinka kas ne,bet šiaip mes gan kuklūs senukai xixixi:)))
 Mielieji,esate stprus,pilni ideju ir jegu jas igivendinti,todel judekite tik pirmyn,be vakar ir be rytojaus...darykite tai siandiena ir dabar...Kristus buvo oziaragis taip pat;)
 Tikra tiesa, na o Albanija Jau aplankiau, ir mane I ta saly labai traukia, vyksiu Jau 3 karta
 2012/02/04 16:24
 labiausiai man patinka tas pasakymas, kad gimstame “seniais”, o kuo toliau, tuo daromės jaunesni. man labai tinka! prieš kelis metus man nebuvo tiek noro kažkur keliauti, vykti, tiek viskuo užsiimti.
 su avinais tai labai gerai sutariu, mano geriausia draugė nuo pirmos klasės gimusi po avino ženklu.
 2012/03/31 20:30
 Visiskai sutinku, kad oziaragiai labai blogai nusiteikia pires Vezius. Nes mano brolis yra vezys, tai su juo kiekviena diena pykstames. O kitas brolis Svarstykles tai su juo visada sutariu :).
 Ožiaragiai nėra tokie nuobodus tik juos reikia geriau pažinti:)
 as oziaragis ir mano kredo ”man reikia”,tai tikra tiesa
 2012/06/25 21:08
 labiausiai atitinka man kad esu sunkiai prieinamas meiles reikaluose 😀
 2012/06/28 13:41
 na ira kas kokiu panasumu bet ten kairaso kat neretai gimsta seneis tai nesutiksiau:)
 2012/08/28 12:06
 Viskas taip atitinka,skaitau ir matau save.O dar tas polinkis į depresiją...man šiuo metu tikra savianalizės ir savigraužos stadija. Gimiau tikra kreistuole.
 2012/09/24 21:34
 pazystu 5 oziaragius kurie yra nuo 10-iki 20 nu as 1nas is ju ti taip vadinami atjautos, ir visi ant tiek megejai pajuokaut kad kartais jei visi 5 susirenkam tai iki zemes graibymo prisijuokiam, net pilvus skauda, be to oziaragiai tarpusavy labai gerai sutaria, noriu paklaust ar ir kam nors kitiems taip yra prikolines radijos?
 2012/09/24 21:35
 taip yra kad seniais ,labai sunku isjudinti oziaragi
 2012/10/15 19:53
 cia visa tiesa apie mane:D
 Nu beveik tiesa bet tikrai ne viskas.
 2013/01/16 11:07
 Skaitau ir netikiu juk tai as.Viskas tiesa. Pats teisingiausias horoskopas.
 Ožiaragė Ieva
 2013/01/20 15:15
 Ko gero, pats altruistiškiausias ženklas. Ožiaragiams nereikia įrodinėti savo jausmų, jie myli savyje. Ne visi tai supranta, todėl dažnai ožiaragiai lieka nesuprasti ir vieniši. Kaip sakoma, jis nuoširdžiai linki žmogui gero, net jei tam žmogui gera ir be jo. Nors kita vertus, ožiaragis, dažnai pasirenkantis altruistišką meilę, kenčia viduje, kartais net trokšta pasisavinti savo meilės objektą (“viskas arba nieko”)... Toks paslaptingas ir gražus šis ženklas, deja, retam pavyksta patekti į jo pasaulį.
 2013/03/10 21:03
 Viskas absoliuciai tiksliai apie mane. Isskyrus viena viennteli punkta, kur sakoma apie tai, kad isnaudoja kiekviena laisva minute, kai kiti laika leidzia tusciai. Sioje vietoje visiska nesamone. Atvirksciai, labai megstu nieko neveikti. ( Nors... turejau pazistama oziarage, gimusia ta pacia diena, kaip ir as, kuri tikrai buvo Barbe Devyndarbe...) Bet pareigingumas, atsakingumas, tikslumas, teisingumas, neromantiskumas, taisykliu laikymasis tikrai yra oziaragiu bruozas. Del ko jie kitiems ir atrodo griezti, salti ir nuobodus. Oziaragiai neskrajoja padebesiais fantaziju pasaulyje – ko gero patys zemiskiausi ir realistiskiausi zmones. Tikrai naiviai nuosirdus, kuo daznai kiti pasinaudoja... Uzsispyre ir neperkalbami, nes isimena detales, i kurias kiti nekreipia demesio. Gaila tik, kad mums gyvenimas atrodo sunkus ir meilei sunku atsiverti... Deja, tai irgi yra tiesa...
 2013/06/20 23:54
 As istiesu esu tokia kurybinga,sportiska ,paklusni...mane ne mazai giria mokytoja mokykloje bet turiu viena bet man labai lengva atskleisti jausmus nezinau kaip kitiems ,bet man patinka sis mano zenklas o jo skammbesys o jo skambesys man primena sinfonija o tos sinfonijos pavadinimas yra ,,Ozeragis”
 2013/08/13 09:32
 Labai aiskiai ir trumpai,bet viskas labai teisingai,nes pati esu oziaragis
 2013/08/24 13:02
 Beveik viskas tiesa 🙂 dėl okultizmo visiška tiesa, visada mane tai traukė :oo vaikystėje neturėjau draugų, tiesiog nepritapdavau, buvau šalta, atsiskyrusi ir maniau dėl to ir esu tokia uždara, pasirodo ožiaragiai visi tokie ;D Bendrauti su žmonėmis man labai sunku, atrodo pradedu atsiverti ir tada suprantu, kad žmogų per giliai į save įsileidau... Turiu vos vieną tikrą draugę, ji šaulys , kartais pasipykstam, bet šiaip gerai sutariam, labai panašios esam 🙂 Tikros meilės dar neradau ir neieškojau, nes man dar tik 17, bet, kai jį sutiksiu žinau, kad niekada nenorėsiu paleisti. Su šeima santykiai visada ne kokie buvo, su mama pykdavausi kasdien, bet ji visada man buvo ir yra svarbiausias žmogus, nesvarbu kiek kartų buvom susypykę. Esu gan kerštinga, jeigu žmogus yra mane įskaudinęs, tai būtinai radusi progą atkeršysiu. Ir atvirkščiai – jei žmogus man yra padaręs kažką gero, tai atsilyginsiu. Nuoskaudas laikau savyje, sunkiai kam atsiveriu, esu materealistė, valdinga ir begalo užsispyrusi, dar vienas blogas mano bruožas, kad esu pesimistė, visada galvoju tik apie blogiausią...beeet gerų savybių visgi turiu 😀 esu ambicinga, atsakinga ir pareiginga, dar esu sukrovusi nemažą žinių pagažą ir apskritai noriu žinoti viską apie viską 😀 Man sunku atsipalaiduoti, bet su gera kompanija sugebu ir atsipalaiduoti. Tačiau aš nesu realistė, labiau svajotoja, man tiesiog fantazijų pasaulis žymiai mielesnis už realybę, bet tai priklauso ir nuo gyvenimo, manasis ne iš lengvųjų. Smagu paiskaityti apie ožiaragius, kažkaip padeda lengviau suprasti save, žinoma viskas priklauso nuo individo, bet zodiako ženklas irgi daug ką nulemia 🙂
 2013/11/24 09:17
 Puikiai apibudino tik asmeniskai man nepatinka bulves,bet visa kita puikiai apibudinama as apstulbusi
 2013/12/29 07:43
 šimtaprocentinė tiesa!!!
 Esu 100%, daznai esu nesuprasta, neturiu daug draugu, mano beviltisko noro buti istikima drauge kiti nesupranta...Daznai esu vienisa ir uzsidariusi, pripratau per daugeli metu, kad taip ir turi buti. Oziaragiu nesutapimas su svaestyklem 100% tiesa, pati palikau ta svajokli, nematanti realybes. Tik kad uztruko 9 metus, kol atsikraciau vienatves baimes ir gailescio jausmo jam...Du oziaragiai kartu-misija neimanoma! Perdaug panasus ir abu uzsispyre, nei vienas nenori nusileisti-kompromisai neimanomi. Uztruko 12 metu tai suprasti. Deja nesutikau mergeles ar jaucio,kad galeciau patvirtinti, kad su jais oziaragiai sudaro darnia pora. Gal dar sutiksiu...
 Esu nuostabus ožiaragis.
 ozerage
 2014/07/01 18:20
 cia visi labai giria ozeragius, as ir pati ozeragis bet man mano zenklas nepatinka! Nuo pat mazumes esu uzsidarius, nekalbi, linkus viska isgyventi savyje, visko visada bijau, esu pernelyg atsargi. Man tas labai kiso koja susirandant draugu ir siaip bendraujant,del to labai isgyvenau ilgus metus. Pirmas vaikina tesugebejau susirast tik kai suejo 22 metai. Paskui artejant treciam desimtmeciui pasikeiciau – islaisvejau,pradejau laisviau bendrauti, spjoviau i viska ir ant visu, bet nezinau ar cia irgi gerai. Keista, su paciais ozeragiais nelabai sutariu, as ju tiesiog nemegstu-merginos ozerages man neidomios, nuobodzios, susikauste, per ramios...vyrai ozeragiai kiek pastebejau merginykai. Vat netinkami zenklai svartykles ir avinai abu mane labai traukia esu turejus daug draugu bei draugiu, puikiai sutariau bet draugyste deja ilgai nesitese. Tinkamiausi draugai ir drauges-mergele, vandenis, dvynys, liutas dar jautis.
 cia visi labai giria ozeragius, as ir pati ozeragis bet man mano zenklas nepatinka! Nuo pat mazumes esu uzsidarius, nekalbi, linkus viska isgyventi savyje, visko visada bijau, esu pernelyg atsargi, ryzto nei laso, jei kazko nenoriu tai uzsispirsiu ir gali daryt ka nori-nepriversi, vienu zodziu baisiniai kaprizai, ir tas nelemtas uzsispyrimas. Man tai labai kiso koja susirandant draugu ir siaip bendraujant,del to labai isgyvenau ilgus metus. Pirmas vaikina tesugebejau susirast tik kai suejo 22 metai. Paskui artejant treciam desimtmeciui pasikeiciau – islaisvejau,pradejau laisviau bendrauti, spjoviau i viska ir ant visu, bet nezinau ar cia irgi gerai. Keista, su paciais ozeragiais nelabai sutariu, as ju tiesiog nemegstu-merginos ozerages man neidomios, nuobodzios, susikauste, per ramios...vyrai ozeragiai kiek pastebejau merginykai. Vat netinkami zenklai svartykles ir avinai abu mane labai traukia esu turejus daug draugu bei draugiu, puikiai sutariau bet draugyste deja ilgai nesitese. Tinkamiausi draugai ir drauges-mergele, vandenis, dvynys, liutas dar jautis.
 Aš pati esu oziarage sis ženklas man labai patinka tik man atrodo kad turiu ir vandenio savybių nes gimiau sausio 19
 Man pwz gan dauk wiskas atitiko o labiausiai tai kad ožeragis wiska isgywena sawyja ir kad kaltinami daznai saltumu 🙁 (as paprasciausiai bijau pasidaryt geda ar but pazemintas pacios paneles darymas ka nors 1karta pwz as net laizytis nemoku 😀 bet jau toks esu) sako kad ozeragei nemegsta reikst jausmu wiesai tikrai pritariu pasizekit daugelis komentaru su netikru wardu 😀 man dauk merginu sako kad esu grazus t.t. Man dbr yra 17m. O normalios paneles dar net neturejas... Nes esu uzdaras tiesiok ngl sawes pakest del sitos sawybes noreciau tureti drauge ir tiesiok wisa laika but su ja 🙂
 2014/12/18 22:02
 Va cia tai tiksliai 🙂
 Eris pabandyk rasti priezasti kad viskas ka darai yra tobula ir pateisinama ir kitaip tu tiesiog nenorejai, o elgeisi kaip jautei. man tas padejo
 tikrai, visa tiesa apie mane
 Gal ir atrodome kietos bejausmes is isores , na bet mums meiles tai reikia is mylimo zmogaus labai daug. Ir nepasakyciau kad kuklios lovoje 😀
 2015/02/08 00:36
 Esu tiesiog suzaveta!! Abu su vyru esame oziaragiai, skaiteme ir stebejomes kaip visas aprasymas atitinka musu buda 🙂 90% is viso aprasymo kaip pirstu i aki apie mus 🙂
 Viska atitko, kai geras 😀
 ...didžiausios, moterys gimusios po ožiaragio ženklu...tikriausiai, barakūdų daugiausia yra, būtent, ožiaragių 😀
 2016/01/14 21:46
 Šitie apibūdinimai atitiko manę. Viskas kaip su pirštu į akį 🙂
 Sveiki, ožiaragiai, girdėjau, patys ištvermingiausi, uždaro giminės karmą, atlaiko visas bėdas, aš tapau neįgali ir tikrai giminėj reikalai gerokai pagerėjo....
 Metų lentelė pagal kinų kalendorių - 311 479 peržiūrėta
 Suderinamumo horoskopas - 182 818 peržiūrėta
 Skorpionas - 136 157 peržiūrėta
 Avinas - 135 750 peržiūrėta
 Vandenis - 134 193 peržiūrėta
 Vėžys - 127 927 peržiūrėta
 Dvyniai - 127 817 peržiūrėta
 Šaulys - 120 535 peržiūrėta
 Jautis - 118 023 peržiūrėta
 Žuvys - 117 973 peržiūrėta
 Svarstyklės - 115 495 peržiūrėta
 Liūtas - 112 717 peržiūrėta
 Simbolių reikšmės - 73 468 peržiūrėta
 Prietarai apie paukščius - 68 314 peržiūrėta


type: legislation

jurisdiction: EU

text:
 AN COIMISIÚN EORPACH
 An Bhruiséil,29.6.2021
 COM(2021) 353 final
 2021/0174(NLE)
 Togra le haghaidh
 CINNEADH ÓN gCOMHAIRLE
 maidir leis an seasamh atá le glacadh thar ceann an Aontais Eorpaigh, le haghaidh na tréimhse 2021-2026, sa Choiste Speisialaithe um Iascach arna bhunú leis an gComhaontú Trádála agus Comhair idir an tAontas Eorpach agus an Comhphobal Eorpach do Fhuinneamh Adamhach, de pháirt amháin, agus Ríocht Aontaithe na Breataine Móire agus Thuaisceart Éireann, den pháirt eile
 MEABHRÁN MÍNIÚCHÁIN
 1.Ábhar an togra
 Is togra é le haghaidh cinneadh ón gComhairle maidir leis an seasamh atá le glacadh thar ceann an Aontais Eorpaigh sa Choiste Speisialaithe um Iascach arna bhunú faoi Airteagal 8(1)(q) den Chomhaontú Trádála agus Comhair idir an tAontas Eorpach agus an Comhphobal Eorpach do Fhuinneamh Adamhach, de pháirt, agus Ríocht Aontaithe na Breataine Móire agus Thuaisceart Éireann, den pháirt eile
 1
 (an Comhaontú Trádála agus Comhair) le haghaidh na tréimhse 2021-2026. Cumhdaíonn an seasamh sin cúraimí an Choiste Speisialaithe um Iascach a bhfuil baint acu le glacadh gníomhartha a bhfuil éifeachtaí dlíthiúla leo faoin gComhaontú Trádála agus Comhair.
 2.Comhthéacs an togra
 2.1.An Comhaontú Trádála agus Comhair idir an tAontas Eorpach agus an Ríocht Aontaithe
 Sa Chomhaontú Trádála agus Comhair leagtar amach socruithe fabhracha i réimsí amhail trádáil in earraí agus i seirbhísí, trádáil dhigiteach, maoin intleachtúil, soláthar poiblí, eitlíocht agus iompar de bhóthar, fuinneamh, iascaireacht, comhar um shlándáil shóisialta, comhar um fhorfheidhmiú agus dlí agus breithiúnach in ábhair choiriúla, comhar téamach agus rannpháirtíocht i gcláir an Aontais. Is é is aidhm do na forálacha atá ann cothroime iomaíochta agus urramú ar cheart bunúsacha a áirithiú. Bhí an Comhaontú Trádála agus Comhair i bhfeidhm go sealadach ón 1 Eanáir 2021 agus tháinig sé i bhfeidhm an 1 Bealtaine 2021.
 2.2.An Coiste Speisialaithe um Iascach
 Le hAirteagal 8(1)(q) den Chomhaontú Trádála agus Comhair, bunaítear an Coiste Speisialaithe um Iascach. Liostaítear in Airteagal 508 den Chomhaontú Trádála agus Comhair, ar bhealach neamh‐uileghabhálach, cúraimí agus réimsí inniúlachta an Choiste Speisialaithe um Iascach.
 Faoi Airteagal 8(4) den Chomhaontú Trádála agus Comhair, tá an chumhacht ag an gCoiste Speisialaithe um Iascach ina réimse inniúlachta:
 ·faireachán agus athbhreithniú a dhéanamh ar chur chun feidhme an Chomhaontaithe Trádála agus Comhair nó aon chomhaontaithe fhorlíontaigh agus feidhmiú cuí an Chomhaontaithe nó aon chomhaontaithe fhorlíontaigh a áirithiú;
 ·cabhrú leis an gComhairle Comhpháirtíochta i gcomhlíonadh a chúraimí agus, go háirithe, tuairisciú don Chomhairle Comhpháirtíochta agus aon chúram a shannfaidh an Chomhairle Comhpháirtíochta dó a dhéanamh;
 ·cinntí agus moltaí a ghlacadh, lena n‐áirítear leasuithe, i leith na n‐ábhar uile dá bhforáiltear amhlaidh sa Chomhaontú seo nó in aon chomhaontú forlíontach nó a bhfuil an Chomhairle Comhpháirtíochta tar éis a cumhachtaí a tharmligean ina leith chuig Coiste Speisialaithe i gcomhréir le pointe (f) d’Airteagal 7(4) den Chomhaontú Trádála agus Comhair;
 ·saincheisteanna teicniúla a eascraíonn as cur chun feidhme an Chomhaontaithe seo nó as aon chomhaontú forlíontach a phlé;
 ·fóram a chur ar fáil ina bhféadfaidh na Páirtithe faisnéis a mhalartú, dea-chleachtais a phlé agus a dtaithí ar an gcur chun feidhme a roinnt;
 ·meithleacha a bhunú, a mhaoirsiú, a chomhordú agus a dhíscaoileadh; agus
 ·fóram comhairliúcháin a chur ar fáil i gcomhréir le hAirteagal 738(7) den Chomhaontú Trádála agus Comhair.
 Faoi Airteagal 8(10) den Chomhaontú Trádála agus Comhair, agus de mhaolú ar Airteagal 8(9) den Chomhaontú Trádála agus Comhair, féadfaidh an Coiste Speisialaithe um Iascach a rialacha féin a ghlacadh agus a leasú ina dhiaidh sin agus is iad na rialacha sin a rialóidh a chuid oibre.
 Faoi Airteagal 508(1) den Chomhaontú Trádála agus Comhair, féadfaidh an Coiste Speisialaithe um Iascach, go háirithe, an méid seo a leanas a dhéanamh:
 ·fóram plé agus comhoibrithe a chur ar fáil i ndáil le bainistiú iascaigh inbhuanaithe;
 ·breathnú a dhéanamh ar straitéisí ilbhliantúla maidir le caomhnú agus bainistiú a fhorbairt mar bhonn chun TACanna agus bearta bainistíochta eile a shocrú;
 ·straitéisí ilbhliantúla a fhorbairt chun stoic neamhchuóta a chaomhnú agus a bhainistiú;
 ·breathnú a dhéanamh ar bhearta le haghaidh bainistiú agus caomhnú, lena n‐áirítear bearta éigeandála agus bearta chun roghnaíocht na hiascaireachta a áirithiú;
 ·cineálacha cur chuige a mheas maidir le sonraí a bhailiú chun críocha bainistíochta eolaíochta agus iascaigh, le sonraí den sórt sin a chomhroinnt (lena n‐áirítear faisnéis atá ábhartha maidir le faireachán a dhéanamh ar chomhlíonadh, le comhlíonadh a rialú agus lena fhorfheidhmiú), agus le comhairliúchán le comhlachtaí eolaíocha maidir leis an gcomhairle eolaíoch is fearr atá le fáil;
 ·breathnú a dhéanamh ar bhearta chun comhlíonadh na rialacha is infheidhme a áirithiú, lena n‐áirítear comhchláir rialaithe, faireacháin agus faireachais agus malartú sonraí chun faireachán a dhéanamh ar ghlacadh deiseanna iascaireachta agus ar rialú agus forfheidhmiú;
 ·na treoirlínte a fhorbairt chun na TACanna a shocrú;
 ·ullmhúcháin a dhéanamh do chomhairliúcháin bhliantúla;
 ·breathnú a dhéanamh ar ábhair a bhaineann le calafoirt a ainmniú le haghaidh cur i dtír, lena n‐áirítear é a éascú do na Páirtithe fógra tráthúil a thabhairt faoi na hainmnithe sin agus faoi aon athruithe ar na hainmniúcháin sin;
 ·amlínte a bhunú chun bearta nua bainistíochta iascaigh a fhógairt agus chun liostaí na soithí lena lorgaítear údaruithe nó ceadúnais chun iascaireacht a dhéanamh a chur in iúl, chomh maith leis an bhfógra don Pháirtí eile sula ndéantar gabhálacha iomlána incheadaithe (TACanna) a shocrú nó a leasú le haghaidh na stoic a liostaítear in Iarscríbhinn 37 a ghabhann leis an gComhaontú Trádála agus Comhair;
 ·fóram a chur ar fáil le haghaidh comhairliúcháin maidir le coinníollacha sonracha rochtana breise le haghaidh na nithe seo a leanas: (a) na deiseanna iascaireachta a comhaontaíodh; (b) aon straitéisí ilbhliana le haghaidh stoic neamhchuóta; agus (c) aon bhearta teicniúla agus caomhnaithe agus fóram le haghaidh comhairliúcháin maidir leis na saincheisteanna a dtugtar aghaidh orthu in Airteagal 506(4) den Chomhaontú Trádála agus Comhair;
 ·treoirlínte a fhorbairt chun tacú le cur i bhfeidhm praiticiúil na rochtana ar uiscí (Airteagal 500 den Chomhaontú Trádála agus Comhair);
 ·sásra a fhorbairt chun deiseanna iascaireachta a aistriú go deonach go bliantúil idir na Páirtithe; agus
 ·cur i bhfeidhm agus cur chun feidhme Airteagal 502 maidir le socruithe rochtana sonracha maidir le Báillcheantar Ghearnsaí, Báillcheantar Gheirsí agus Oileán Mhanann a mheas, agus cur i bhfeidhm agus cur chun feidhme Airteagal 503 den Chomhaontú Trádála agus Comhair maidir le tréimhsí fógra maidir le táirgí iascaigh a allmhairiú agus a thabhairt i dtír go díreach a mheas.
 2.3.Na gníomhartha atá beartaithe ag an gCoiste Speisialaithe um Iascach
 Faoi Airteagal 508(2) den Chomhaontú Trádála agus Comhair, féadfaidh an Coiste Speisialaithe um Iascach gníomhartha nó bearta a ghlacadh, lena n‐áirítear cinntí agus moltaí:
 ·ar ábhair arna gcomhaontú ag na Páirtithe a thaifeadadh tar éis comhairliúcháin faoi Airteagal 498 den Chomhaontú Trádála agus Comhair;
 ·i ndáil le haon cheann de na nithe dá dtagraítear i bpointí (b), (c), (d), (e), (f), (g), (i), (j), (l), (m) agus (n) de mhír 1 d’Airteagal 508 den Chomhaontú Trádála agus Comhair;
 ·chun liosta na n‐oibleagáidí idirnáisiúnta atá ann cheana dá dtagraítear in Airteagal 496(2) den Chomhaontú Trádála agus Comhair a leasú;
 ·i ndáil le haon ghné eile den chomhar maidir le bainistíocht iascaigh inbhuanaithe faoin gceannteideal ‘Iascach’ den Chomhaontú Trádála agus Comhair; agus
 ·maidir leis na módúlachtaí athbhreithniúcháin faoi Airteagal 510 den Chomhaontú Trádála agus Comhair.
 Is é an cuspóir a bheidh ag bearta den sórt sin ceannteideal an iascaigh den Chomhaontú Trádála agus Comhair a chur chun feidhme.
 3.An seasamh atá le glacadh thar ceann an Aontais Eorpaigh
 De bhun Airteagal 218(9) den Chonradh ar Fheidhmiú an Aontais Eorpaigh (CFAE), glacfaidh an Chomhairle, ar thogra ón gCoimisiún, an seasamh atá le glacadh thar ceann an Aontais sa Choiste Speisialaithe um Iascach, maidir le cinntí a ghlacfar faoi Airteagal 508(2) den Chomhaontú Trádála agus Comhair.
 Ba cheart na seasaimh laistigh den Choiste Speisialaithe um Iascach a bhunú trí chur chuige dhá shraith a úsáid. Ar dtús, ba cheart na bunphrionsabail agus treoshuímh sheasamh an Aontais ar bhonn ilbhliantúil a leagan amach i gCinneadh ón gComhairle. Ar an dara dul síos, le haghaidh gach cruinniú ina bhféadfaí iarraidh ar an gCoiste Speisialaithe um Iascach gníomhartha nó bearta a bhfuil éifeachtaí dlíthiúla leo a ghlacadh, ba cheart an seasamh a fhorlíonadh le páipéir leathoifigiúla arna n‐ullmhú ag an gCoimisiún agus arna bplé i Meitheal na Comhairle.
 Tá sé d’aidhm ag an togra seo seasamh an Aontais Eorpaigh laistigh den Choiste Speisialaithe um Iascach a leagan amach. Sa togra cuirtear chun feidhme prionsabail agus treoshuímh an Chomhbheartais Iascaigh (CBI) mar a leagtar síos i Rialachán (AE) Uimh. 1380/2013 iad, go háirithe in Airteagail 2, 28 agus 33 de. Cuirtear chun feidhme leis freisin forálacha na bpleananna ilbhliantúla mar a leagtar síos iad i Rialachán (AE) 2018/973 ó Pharlaimint na hEorpa agus ón gComhairle an 4 Iúil 2018 lena mbunaítear plean ilbhliantúil do stoic ghrinnill sa Mhuir Thuaidh
 2
 agus Rialachán (AE) 2019/472 lena mbunaítear plean ilbhliantúil do stoic a dhéantar a iascach in Uiscí an Iarthair
 3
 .
 Tá an togra ailínithe leis na cuspóirí agus na prionsabail a bhunaítear in Airteagal 494 den Chomhaontú Trádála agus Comhair agus cuirtear san áireamh leis tréithe sonrach an cheannteideal ‘Iascach’ sa Chomhaontú Trádála agus Comhair. Cuimsítear ann freisin an próiseas caighdeánach le haghaidh na sonraíochtaí laistigh den bhliain de chuid sheasamh an Aontais Eorpaigh atá le glacadh sa Choiste Speisialaithe um Iascach.
 I gcomhréir le hAirteagal 218(10) CFAE agus Cinneadh (AE) 2021/689 ón gComhairle
 4
 , tá Parlaimint na hEorpa le cur ar an eolas láithreach agus ina iomláine faoi ghníomhaíochtaí an Choiste Speisialaithe um Iascach, faoi réir na socruithe is gá chun rúndacht a chaomhnú. Mar riail ghinearálta, soláthróidh an Coimisiún an fhaisnéis do Pharlaimint na hEorpa tríd an gcoiste parlaiminteach freagrach. Ba cheart an faisnéisiú roimh chruinnithe an Choiste Speisialaithe um Iascach agus ina dhiaidh a bheith san áireamh san fhaisnéis sin, chomh maith le gach doiciméad a bhaineann lena gcruinnithe ag an tráth céanna a chomhroinnfidh an Coimisiún leis an gComhairle iad.
 Tá na módúlachtaí oibre sin le bheith bunaithe ar phrionsabal an chomhair dhílis fhrithpháirtigh idir institiúidí an Aontais, mar a chumhdaítear in Airteagal 13(2) CAE.
 4.Bunús dlí
 4.1.Bunús dlí nós imeachta
 4.1.1.Na prionsabail
 In Airteagal 218(9) de CFAE déantar foráil maidir le cinneadh ón gComhairle lena leagfar síos ‘na seasaimh a ghlacfar thar ceann an Aontais i gcomhlacht arna chur ar bun le comhaontú nuair a iarrtar ar an gcomhlacht sin gníomhartha a ghlacadh a bhfuil éifeachtaí dlíthiúla leo, seachas gníomhartha lena bhforlíonfar nó lena leasófar creat institiúideach an chomhaontaithe.’
 Áirítear ar na ‘gníomhartha a bhfuil éifeachtaí dlíthiúla leo’ gníomhartha a bhfuil éifeachtaí dlíthiúla leo de bhua rialacha an dlí idirnáisiúnta lena rialaítear an comhlacht i gceist agus ionstraimí nach bhfuil éifeacht cheangailteach leo faoin dlí idirnáisiúnta, ach a d’fhéadfadh ‘tionchar cinntitheach a imirt ar ábhar na reachtaíochta a ghlacfaidh reachtóir an Aontais Eorpaigh’
 5
 .
 4.1.2.Cur i bhfeidhm maidir leis an gcás seo
 Is comhlacht é an Coiste Speisialaithe um Iascach arna bhunú faoi chomhaontú idirnáisiúnta, eadhon an Comhaontú Trádála agus Comhair.
 Féadfaidh na bearta a ghlacfaidh an Coiste Speisialaithe um Iascach a bheith ceangailteach ar na Páirtithe i gcomhréir le hAirteagal 10 den Chomhaontú Trádála agus Comhair, ina ndéantar foráil: ‘Na cinntí a ghlacfaidh an Chomhairle Comhpháirtíochta, nó, de réir mar a bheidh, Coiste, beidh siad ina gceangal ar na Páirtithe agus ar na comhlachtaí uile arna mbunú faoin gComhaontú seo agus faoi aon chomhaontú forlíontach, lena n‐áirítear an binse eadrána dá dtagraítear i dTeideal I de Chuid a Sé. Ní bheidh aon bhrí cheangailteach le moltaí.’
 Féadfaidh moltaí agus gníomhartha eile a ghlacfaidh an Coiste Speisialaithe um Iascach a bheith in ann tionchar cinntitheach a imirt ar ábhar na reachtaíochta a ghlacfaidh reachtóir an Aontais Eorpaigh, fiú mura bhfuil éifeacht cheangailteach acu faoin dlí idirnáisiúnta. Na gníomhartha nó bearta a ghlacfaidh an Coiste Speisialaithe um Iascach, ní dhéanfaidh siad creat institiúideach an Chomhaontaithe Trádála agus Comhar a fhorlíonadh ná a leasú.
 Dá bhrí sin, is é Airteagal 218(9) CFAE an bunús dlí nós imeachta le haghaidh an Chinnidh atá beartaithe.
 4.2.Bunús dlí substainteach
 4.2.1.Na prionsabail
 Braitheann an bunús dlí substainteach maidir le cinneadh faoi Airteagal 218(9) CFAE go príomha ar chuspóir agus inneachar an ghnímh atá beartaithe a nglacfar seasamh thar ceann an Aontais ina leith. Má shaothraítear dhá aidhm leis nó má tá dhá chomhpháirt ann agus más féidir ceann de na haidhmeanna sin nó de na comhpháirteanna sin a shainaithint mar phríomhaidhm nó mar phríomh‐chomhpháirt, rud a chiallaíonn gur aidhm nó comhpháirt theagmhasach an ceann eile, ní mór an Cinneadh faoi Airteagal 218(9) CFAE a bhunú ar bhunús dlí substainteach aonair, is é sin an bunús dlí a éilítear de réir na príomhaidhme nó na príomh‐chomhpháirte.
 I gcás gníomh atá beartaithe a bhfuil roinnt cuspóirí éagsúla á saothrú leis san am céanna, nó a bhfuil roinnt comhpháirteanna éagsúla ann, ar cuspóirí nó comhpháirteanna iad a bhfuil dlúthnasc doscartha eatarthu gan aon cheann acu a bheith teagmhasach le hais an ceann eile, ní mór, ar bhonn eisceachtúil, na boinn chomhfhreagracha dlí ar fad a áireamh sa bhunús dlí substainteach atá leis an gcinneadh faoi Airteagal 218(9) de CFAE.
 4.2.2.Cur i bhfeidhm maidir leis an gcás seo
 Is leis an iascach a bhaineann an príomhchuspóir agus inneachar an chinnidh atá beartaithe. Is é Rialachán (AE) Uimh. 1380/2013 an bunús dlí lena leagtar amach na prionsabail atá le léiriú leis an seasamh seo.
 Dá bhrí sin, is bunaithe ar Airteagal 43 CFAE atá an Cinneadh atá beartaithe.
 4.3.Conclúid
 Ba cheart Airteagal 43 CFAE, i gcomhar le hAirteagal 218(9) CFAE, a bheith mar bhunús dlí don Chinneadh atá beartaithe.
 2021/0174 (NLE)
 Togra le haghaidh
 CINNEADH ÓN gCOMHAIRLE
 maidir leis an seasamh atá le glacadh thar ceann an Aontais Eorpaigh, le haghaidh na tréimhse 2021-2026, sa Choiste Speisialaithe um Iascach arna bhunú leis an gComhaontú Trádála agus Comhair idir an tAontas Eorpach agus an Comhphobal Eorpach do Fhuinneamh Adamhach, de pháirt amháin, agus Ríocht Aontaithe na Breataine Móire agus Thuaisceart Éireann, den pháirt eile
 TÁ COMHAIRLE AN AONTAIS EORPAIGH,
 Ag féachaint don Chonradh ar Fheidhmiú an Aontais Eorpaigh, agus go háirithe Airteagal 43, i gcomhar le hAirteagal 218(9) de,
 Ag féachaint don togra ón gCoimisiún Eorpach,
 De bharr an mhéid seo a leanas:
 (1)An 29 Aibreán 2021, ghlac an Chomhairle Cinneadh (AE) 2021/689
 6
 maidir leis an gComhaontú Trádála agus Comhair idir an tAontas Eorpach agus an Comhphobal Eorpach do Fhuinneamh Adamhach, de pháirt amháin, agus Ríocht Aontaithe na Breataine Móire agus Thuaisceart Éireann, den pháirt eile
 7
 (an ‘Comhaontú Trádála agus Comhair’) a thabhairt i gcrích. Tháinig an Comhaontú Trádála agus Comhair i bhfeidhm an 1 Bealtaine 2021.
 (2)Le hAirteagal 8(1)(q) den Chomhaontú Trádála agus Comhair, bunaítear an Coiste Speisialaithe um Iascach. Leagtar amach a inniúlachtaí in Airteagal 8(4) den Chomhaontú Trádála agus Comhair.
 (3)Le hAirteagal 8(4)(f) den Chomhaontú Trádála agus Comhair, tugtar de chumhacht don Choiste Speisialaithe um Iascach meithleacha a bhunú, a mhaoirsiú, a chomhordú agus a dhíscaoileadh.
 (4)I gcomhréir le hAirteagal 8(10) den Chomhaontú Trádála agus Comhair, agus de mhaolú ar Airteagal 8(9), féadfaidh an Coiste Speisialaithe um Iascach a rialacha féin a ghlacadh agus a leasú ina dhiaidh sin, rialacha lena rialófar obair an Choiste.
 (5)Liostaítear in Airteagal 508 den Chomhaontú Trádála agus Comhair, ar bhealach neamh‐uileghabhálach, cúraimí agus réimsí inniúlachta an Choiste Speisialaithe um Iascach.
 (6)Tá an Coiste Speisialaithe um Iascach freagrach as bearta a ghlacadh, lena n‐áirítear cinntí agus moltaí, chun tacú le cuspóirí Airteagal 494 den Chomhaontú Trádála agus Comhair, go háirithe comhar d’fhonn a áirithiú maidir le gníomhaíochtaí iascaireachta le haghaidh stoic chomhroinnte in uiscí na bPáirtithe, go mbeidh siad inbhuanaithe san fhadtéarma ó thaobh na heacnamaíochta de, go rannchuideoidh siad le tairbhí eacnamaíocha agus sóisialta a bhaint amach, agus cearta agus oibleagáidí na Stát cósta neamhspleách á n‐urramú go hiomlán de réir mar a fheidhmíonn na Páirtithe iad, agus go rannchuideoidh siad leis an gcuspóir maidir le stoic chomhroinnte a shaothrú ar rátaí lena mbeartaítear pobail na speiceas a shaothraítear a chothabháil agus a athbhunú de réir a chéile os cionn na leibhéal bithmhaise lenar féidir an uastáirgeacht inbhuanaithe a bhaint amach. D’fhéadfadh sé go dtiocfadh na bearta sin chun bheith ina gceangal ar an Aontas.
 (7)Le Rialachán (AE) Uimh. 1380/2013 ó Pharlaimint na hEorpa agus ón gComhairle
 8
 , foráiltear go bhfuil an tAontas lena áirithiú go mbeidh gníomhaíochtaí iascaireachta agus dobharshaothraithe inbhuanaithe ó thaobh an chomhshaoil de san fhadtéarma agus go mbainisteofar iad ar bhealach a bheidh ag luí leis na cuspóirí maidir le tairbhí eacnamaíocha, sóisialta agus fostaíochta a bhaint amach, agus maidir le rannchuidiú le hinfhaighteacht soláthairtí bia. Foráiltear leis go bhfuil an tAontas le bearta bainistíochta agus caomhnaithe a dhéanamh ar bhonn na comhairle eolaíche is fearr atá ar fáil, chun tacú le forbairt an eolais eolaíoch agus na comhairle eolaíche, chun ábhar muirí aischurtha a dhíchur de réir a chéile agus chun modhanna iascaireachta a chur chun cinn a mbeidh mar thoradh orthu iascaireacht atá níos roghnaí, gabhálacha de thaisme a sheachaint agus a laghdú a mhéid is féidir, agus iascaireacht a bhfuil tionchar íseal aici ar an éiceachóras muirí agus ar acmhainn iascaigh. Foráiltear go sonrach le Rialachán (AE) Uimh. 1380/2013 go bhfuil an tAontas leis na cuspóirí agus na prionsabail sin a chur i bhfeidhm le linn dó a chaidreamh seachtrach iascaigh a sheoladh.
 (8)Is iomchuí an seasamh atá le glacadh thar ceann an Aontais i gcruinnithe den Choiste Speisialaithe um Iascach a bhunú, i ndáil le gníomhartha ón gCoiste Speisialaithe um Iascach atá ina gceangal ar an Aontas nó a d’fhéadfadh tionchar cinntitheach a imirt ar ábhar dhlí an Aontais.
 (9)Cuirfear Parlaimint na hEorpa go hiomlán ar an eolas láithreach, mar a fhoráiltear in Airteagal 218(10) CFAE, chun go mbeidh sí in ann a sainchumais a fheidhmiú go hiomlán i gcomhréir leis na Conarthaí.
 (10)I bhfianaise chineál athraitheach na hacmhainne iascaigh a chumhdaítear leis an gComhaontú Trádála agus Comhair agus an gá atá ann dá bharr go n‐áireofar ar sheasamh an Aontais forbairtí nua, lena n‐áirítear faisnéis eolaíoch nua agus faisnéis ábhartha eile a thíolactar roimh chruinnithe den Choiste Speisialaithe um Iascach nó lena linn, ba cheart nósanna imeachta a bhunú, i gcomhréir le prionsabal an chomhair dhílis i measc institiúidí an Aontais a chumhdaítear in Airteagal 13(2) den Chonradh ar an Aontas Eorpach, maidir le sonraíocht sheasamh an Aontais ó bhliain go bliain le haghaidh na tréimhse 2021-2026,
 TAR ÉIS AN CINNEADH SEO A GHLACADH:
 Airteagal 1
 Leagfar amach an seasamh atá le glacadh thar ceann an Aontais i gcruinnithe den Choiste Speisialaithe um Iascach a bunaíodh le hAirteagal 8(1)(q) den Chomhaontú Trádála agus Comhair in Iarscríbhinní I agus II.
 Airteagal 2
 Leagfar amach sonraíochtaí sheasamh an Aontais a bheidh le glacadh i gcruinnithe den Choiste Speisialaithe um Iascach dá dtagraítear in Airteagal 1 i gcomhréir le hIarscríbhinn III.
 Airteagal 3
 Déanfar seasamh an Aontais dá dtagraítear in Airteagal 1 a mheasúnú agus, i gcás inarb iomchuí, déanfaidh an Chomhairle é a athbhreithniú ar thogra ón gCoimisiún, faoin 30 Meitheamh 2026.
 Dírítear an Cinneadh seo chuig an gCoimisiún.
 Arna dhéanamh sa Bhruiséil,
 Thar ceann na Comhairle
 An tUachtarán
 (1)
 IO L 149, 30.4.2021, lgh. 10-2539.
 (2)
 Rialachán (AE) 2018/973 ó Pharlaimint na hEorpa agus ón gComhairle an 4 Iúil 2018 lena mbunaítear plean ilbhliantúil do stoic ghrinnill sa Mhuir Thuaidh agus don iascach a shaothraíonn na stoic sin, lena sonraítear mionsonraí maidir le cur chun feidhme na hoibleagáide gabhálacha a thabhairt i dtír sa Mhuir Thuaidh agus lena n‐aisghairtear Rialachán (CE) Uimh. 676/2007 agus Rialachán (CE) Uimh. 1342/2008 ón gComhairle, IO L 179, 16.7.2018, lgh. 1–13.
 (3)
 Rialachán (AE) 2019/472 ó Pharlaimint na hEorpa agus ón gComhairle an 19 Márta 2019 lena mbunaítear plean ilbhliantúil do stoic a dhéantar a iascach in Uiscí an Iarthair agus sna huiscí máguaird agus d’iascaigh a shaothraíonn na stoic sin, lena leasaítear Rialacháin (AE) 2016/1139 agus (AE) 2018/973 agus lena n‐aisghairtear Rialacháin (CE) Uimh. 811/2004, (CE) Uimh. 2166/2005, (CE) Uimh. 388/2006, (CE) Uimh. 509/2007 agus (CE) Uimh. 1300/2008 ón gComhairle, IO L 83, 25.3.2019, lgh. 1–17.
 (4)
 Cinneadh (AE) 2021/689 ón gComhairle an 29 Aibreán 2021 maidir le tabhairt i gcrích, thar ceann an Aontais, an Chomhaontaithe Trádála agus Comhair idir an tAontas Eorpach agus an Comhphobal Eorpach do Fhuinneamh Adamhach, de pháirt, agus Ríocht Aontaithe na Breataine Móire agus Thuaisceart Éireann, den pháirt eile, agus an Chomhaontaithe idir an tAontas Eorpach agus Ríocht Aontaithe na Breataine Móire agus Thuaisceart Éireann a bhaineann le nósanna imeachta slándála le haghaidh malartú agus cosaint faisnéise rúnaicmithe, IO L 149, 30.4.2021, lch. 2-9.
 (5)
 Breithiúnas ó Chúirt Bhreithiúnais an Aontais Eorpaigh an 7 Deireadh Fómhair 2014, an Ghearmáin v an Chomhairle, C-399/12, ECLI:EU:C:2014:2258, míreanna 61 go 64.
 (6)
 IO L 149, 30.4.2021, lch. 2.
 (7)
 IO L 149, 30.4.2021, lch. 10.
 (8)
 Rialachán (AE) Uimh. 1380/2013 ó Pharlaimint na hEorpa agus ón gComhairle an 11 Nollaig 2013 maidir leis an gComhbheartas Iascaigh, lena leasaítear Rialacháin (CE) Uimh. 1954/2003 agus (CE) Uimh. 1224/2009 ón gComhairle agus lena n‐aisghairtear Rialacháin (CE) Uimh. 2371/2002 agus (CE) Uimh. 639/2004 ón gComhairle agus cinneadh 2004/585/CE ón gComhairle (IO L 354, 28.12.2013, lch. 22).
 ---documentbreak---
 AN COIMISIÚN EORPACH
 An Bhruiséil,29.6.2021
 COM(2021) 353 final
 IARSCRÍBHINNÍ
 a ghabhann leis an
 Togra le haghaidh Cinneadh ón gComhairle
 maidir leis an seasamh atá le glacadh thar ceann an Aontais Eorpaigh, le haghaidh na tréimhse 2021-2026, sa Choiste Speisialaithe um Iascach arna bhunú leis an gComhaontú Trádála agus Comhair idir an tAontas Eorpach agus an Comhphobal Eorpach do Fhuinneamh Adamhach, de pháirt amháin, agus Ríocht Aontaithe na Breataine Móire agus Thuaisceart Éireann, den pháirt eile
 IARSCRÍBHINN I
 1.Prionsabail
 Faoin gComhaontú Trádála agus Comhair (‘TCA’), déanfaidh an tAontas:
 (a)Gníomhú i gcomhréir leis na cuspóirí agus na prionsabail atá á saothrú ag an Aontas laistigh den Chomhbheartas Iascaigh, go sonrach tríd an gcur chuige réamhchúraim agus na haidhmeanna a bhaineann leis an uastáirgeacht inbhuanaithe mar a leagtar síos in Airteagal 2(2) de Rialachán (AE) 1380/2013, chun cur chun feidhme chur chuige i leith bainistiú iascaigh atá bunaithe ar an éiceachóras a chur chun cinn, chun gabhálacha de thaisme a sheachaint agus a íoslaghdú a mhéid is féidir agus chun deireadh a chur le haischuir diaidh ar ndiaidh, agus chun tionchar na ngníomhaíochtaí iascaireachta ar éiceachórais mhuirí agus ar a ngnáthóga a íoslaghdú agus, chomh maith leis sin, trí iascaigh de chuid an Aontais atá inmharthana agus iomaíoch ó thaobh an gheilleagair de a chur chun cinn, caighdeán cothrom maireachtála a chur ar fáil do na daoine a bhíonn ag brath ar ghníomhaíochtaí iascaireachta, agus leasanna na dtomhaltóirí á gcur san áireamh; agus i gcomhréir le hAirteagal 28 agus Airteagal 33 den Rialachán sin maidir le bainistiú stoc leasa choitinn;
 (b)Oibríochtú an Choiste Speisialaithe um Iascach (‘SCF’) a áirithiú, lena n‐áirítear a rialacha nós imeachta a mhionsaothrú nó a leasú;
 (c)A áirithiú go gcuirfear ar bun na meithleacha is gá le haghaidh obair SCF, lena n‐áirítear, de réir mar is iomchuí, a rialacha nós imeachta a mhionsaothrú agus a ghlacadh;
 (d)Féachaint lena áirithiú go mbeidh gníomhartha nó bearta a bhfuil éifeacht dhlíthiúil leo a ghlacfaidh SCF comhsheasmhach leis an dlí idirnáisiúnta, Coinbhinsiún na Náisiún Aontaithe maidir le Dlí na Farraige, Comhaontú na Náisiún Aontaithe maidir le Stoic Éisc, Comhaontú FAO ar Bhearta Stát an Chalafoirt;
 (e)A áirithiú go mbeidh gníomhartha nó bearta a bhfuil éifeachtaí dlíthiúla leo arna nglacadh ag SCF comhsheasmhach le cuspóirí agus le prionsabail an Chomhaontaithe Trádála agus Comhair (Airteagal 494) lena n‐áirítear inbhuanaitheacht fhadtéarmach agus an úsáid is fearr a bhaint as stoic chomhroinnte, úsáid a bhaint as an gcomhairle eolaíoch is fearr dá bhfuil ar fáil mar bhonn do chinntí caomhnaithe agus bainistíochta, bearta comhréireacha neamh-idirdhealaitheacha a chur i bhfeidhm maidir le beo-acmhainní muirí a chaomhnú agus acmhainní iascaigh a bhainistiú agus, san am céanna, uathriail rialála na bPáirtithe a chaomhnú;
 (f)Seasaimh atá comhsheasmhach le dea-chleachtais agus seasaimh a ghlactar i bhfóraim eile agus i gcomhairliúcháin iltaobhacha agus dhéthaobhacha san Atlantach thoir thuaidh a chur chun cinn agus comhordú le páirtithe eile agus le Coimisiún Iascaigh an Atlantaigh Thoir Thuaidh a chur chun cinn;
 (g)A áirithiú go ndéantar gealltanais idirnáisiúnta an Aontais a urramú;
 (h)A bheith i gcomhréir le Conclúidí ón gComhairle an 19 Márta 2012 maidir leis an Teachtaireacht ón gCoimisiún i ndáil le gné sheachtrach an chomhbheartais iascaigh;
 (i)Cur chun feidhme tráthúil na mbeart arna nglacadh faoi TCA ag na Páirtithe isteach i gcreat dlíthiúil an Aontais, féachaint leis an méid sin a cur chun cinn.
 IARSCRÍBHINN II
 1.Treoshuíomhanna
 Féachfaidh an tAontas, i gcás inarb iomchuí, le tacú le obair SCF, leis an méid seo a leanas go háirithe:
 (a)Plé agus comhar i ndáil le bainistiú iascaigh inbhuanaithe;
 (b)Aird a thabhairt ar fhorbairt straitéisí ilbhliantúla maidir le caomhnú agus bainistiú mar bhonn chun TACanna agus bearta bainistíochta eile a shocrú;
 (c)Straitéisí ilbhliantúla a fhorbairt chun stoic neamhchuóta a chaomhnú agus a bhainistiú mar a thagraítear faoi TCA;
 (d)Aird a thabhairt ar bhearta chun iascaigh a bhainistiú agus a chaomhnú, lena n‐áirítear bearta éigeandála chun roghnaíocht gníomhaíochtaí iascaireachta a áirithiú;
 (e)Aird a thabhairt ar chuir chuige maidir le bailiú sonraí chun críocha eolaíochta agus bainistiú iascaigh, na sonraí sin a chomhroinnt, lena n‐áirítear faisnéis is ábhartha chun faireachán, rialáil agus forfheidhmiú a dhéanamh ar chomhlíonadh, agus maidir le dul i gcomhairle le comhlachtaí eolaíochta maidir leis an gcomhairle eolaíoch is fearr dá bhfuil ar fáil;
 (f)Aird a thabhairt ar bhearta chun comhlíonadh na rialacha is infheidhme a áirithiú, lena n‐áirítear cláir chomhpháirteacha rialaithe agus faireacháin agus ar mhalartú sonraí chun faireachán a dhéanamh ar ghlacadh deiseanna iascaireachta agus rialú agus forfheidhmiú a éascú;
 (g)Treoirlínte a fhorbairt chun na TACanna dá dtagraítear in Airteagal 499(6) de TCA maidir le TACanna sealadacha a shocrú;
 (h)Ullmhúchán do na comhairliúcháin bhliantúla;
 (i)Aird a thabhairt ar ábhair a bhaineann le calafoirt a ainmniú le haghaidh cur i dtír, lena n‐áirítear é a éascú do na Páirtithe fógra tráthúil a thabhairt faoi na hainmnithe sin agus faoi aon athruithe ar na hainmnithe sin;
 (j)Amlínte a bhunú le haghaidh fógra a thabhairt faoi bhearta dá dtagraítear in Airteagal 496(3), na liostaí soithí dá dtagraítear in Airteagal 497(1) a thuairisciú agus an fógra dá dtagraítear in Airteagal 498(7) de TCA;
 (k)Fóraim le haghaidh comhairliúchán a chur ar fáil faoi Airteagal 501(2) agus Airteagal 506(4) de TCA;
 (l)Sásra a fhorbairt le haghaidh deiseanna iascaireachta a aistriú go deonach idir Páirtithe le linn na bliana, dá dtagraítear in Airteagal 498(8) de TCA;
 (m)Aird a thabhairt ar chur i bhfeidhm agus cur chun feidhme Airteagal 502 agus Airteagal 503 de TCA;
 (n)Meithleacha a bhunú, faireachán a dhéanamh orthu, iad a chomhordú agus a scor faoi Airteagal 8(f) de TCA.
 2.Féachfaidh an tAontas, i gcás inarb iomchuí, le tacú le hobair SCF i bhfianaise gníomhartha nó bearta a ghlacadh a bhfuil éifeacht dhlíthiúil leo a mhéid a bhaineann le:
 (a)Na hábhair dá dtagraítear in Iarscríbhinn II pointe 1) thuas;
 (b)Ábhair atá comhaontaithe ag na Páirtithe a thaifeadadh tar éis dul i gcomhairle faoi Airteagal 498 de TCA;
 (c)An liosta gealltanas idirnáisiúnta atá ann cheana dá dtagraítear in Airteagal 496(2) de TCA a leasú;
 (d)A bhaineann le haon ghné eile den chomhar maidir le bainistiú iascach inbhuanaithe faoi TCA;
 (e)Na módúlachtaí a bhaineann le hathbhreithniú faoi Airteagal 510 de TCA.
 IARSCRÍBHINN III
 Sonrú ó bhliain go bliain ar sheasamh an Aontais a bheidh le glacadh
 ag cruinnithe den Choiste Speisialaithe um Iascach
 Sula nglacfaidh SCF gníomhartha nó bearta a bhfuil éifeachtaí dlíthiúla leo, déanfar na bearta is gá ionas go ndéanfaidh an seasamh a chuirfear in iúl thar ceann an Aontais an fhaisnéis eolaíoch is déanaí agus faisnéis ábhartha eile a chuirtear chuig an gCoimisiún a chur san áireamh, i gcomhréir leis na prionsabail agus na treoshuímh a leagtar amach in Iarscríbhinní I agus II.
 Chuige sin, agus bunaithe ar an bhfaisnéis sin, tarchuirfidh an Coimisiún chuig an gComhairle, nó chuig a comhlachtaí ullmhúcháin, in am trátha roimh gach cruinniú de SCF, doiciméad i scríbhinn ina leagfar amach sonraí na sonraíochta atá beartaithe maidir le seasamh an Aontais i dtaca le sonraí an tseasaimh a chuirfear in iúl thar ceann an Aontais a phlé agus a fhormhuiniú.
 Áiritheofar go mbeidh Parlaimint na hEorpa in inmhe a sainphribhléidí institiúideacha a fheidhmiú go hiomlán i rith an phróisis i gcomhréir leis na Conarthaí.
 Más rud é, le linn chruinniú SCF, nach féidir teacht ar chomhaontú, lena n‐áirítear comhaontú ar an láthair, chun go gcuirfidh seasamh an Aontais gnéithe nua san áireamh, cuirfear an t‐ábhar faoi bhráid na Comhairle nó faoi bhráid a comhlachtaí ullmhúcháin.


type: wikipedia

text:
È autrice di diversi libri sulla nutrizione, tra cui Nourishing Traditions, ed è cofondatrice e presidente della Weston A. Price Foundation, con sede a Washington D.C.
 Lei e suo marito, Geoffrey Morell, gestiscono anche una fattoria sperimentale a Brandywine, Prince George’s County, Maryland, che implementa i principi di allevamento da lei sostenuti, compresa una campagna per promuovere quello che lei chiama latte autentico.
 Nel settembre 2020, è coautrice di un libro con Thomas Cowan, The Contagion Myth, che riprende le tesi di un libretto scritto da Arthur Firstenberg: The Invisible Rainbow. Il suo contenuto correla l’inquinamento elettromagnetico con la genesi di pandemie storiche, tra cui l’influenza spagnola e la pandemia di COVID-19. Il libro è stato rapidamente ritirato dal sito di Amazon con la motivazione che le affermazioni che faceva non erano in linea con l’attuale consenso scientifico.
 Opere
 Bibliografia
 Note
 Saggisti statunitensi
 Scrittori di medicina alternativa
 Allevatori statunitensi


text:
 2.7.2011
 HU
 Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja
 L 175/3
 A BIZOTTSÁG 644/2011/EU VÉGREHAJTÁSI RENDELETE
 (2011. július 1.)
 a boralkohol új ipari célokra történő felhasználására irányuló 1/2011 EU sz. pályázati eljárás megindításáról
 AZ EURÓPAI BIZOTTSÁG,
 tekintettel az Európai Unió működéséről szóló szerződésre,
 tekintettel a borpiac közös szervezéséről szóló, 1999. május 17-i 1493/1999/EK tanácsi rendeletre (1) és különösen annak 33. cikkére,
 mivel:
 (1)
 A mezőgazdasági piacok közös szervezésének létrehozásáról, valamint egyes mezőgazdasági termékekre vonatkozó egyedi rendelkezésekről szóló 1234/2007/EK rendelet („az egységes közös piacszervezésről szóló rendelet”) módosításáról szóló, 2009. május 25-i 491/2009/EK tanácsi rendelet (2) 3. cikkének (2) bekezdése előírja, hogy a borpiac közös szervezéséről, az 1493/1999/EK, az 1782/2003/EK, az 1290/2005/EK és a 3/2008/EK rendelet módosításáról, valamint a 2392/86/EGK és az 1493/1999/EK rendelet hatályon kívül helyezéséről szóló, 2008. április 29-i 479/2008/EK tanácsi rendelet (3) 128. cikkének (3) bekezdését ez utóbbi rendelet hatályon kívül helyezése ellenére továbbra is alkalmazni kell.
 (2)
 A 479/2008/EK rendelet 128. cikke értelmében a borpiac közös szervezéséről szóló, 1999. május 17-i 1493/1999/EK tanácsi rendelet (4) III. címe szerinti, a piaci mechanizmusokra vonatkozó intézkedések a rendelet hatályon kívül helyezése ellenére továbbra is alkalmazandók, amennyiben a szóban forgó intézkedések végrehajtását 2008. augusztus 1-jét megelőzően már elkezdték, illetve végrehajtásukra az említett időpont előtt kötelezettséget vállaltak. A borpiac közös szervezéséről szóló 479/2008/EK tanácsi rendeletnek a támogatási programok, a harmadik országokkal folytatott kereskedelem, a termelési potenciál és borágazat ellenőrzése tekintetében történő végrehajtására vonatkozó részletes szabályok megállapításáról szóló, 2008. június 27-i 555/2008/EK bizottsági rendelet (5) 103. cikke hasonlóképpen előírja, hogy a piaci mechanizmusokra tekintettel a borpiac közös szervezéséről szóló 1493/1999/EK rendelet végrehajtása részletes szabályainak megállapításáról szóló, 2000. július 25-i 1623/2000/EK bizottsági rendeletben (6) megállapított vonatkozó szabályok az 1623/2000/EK rendelet hatályon kívül helyezése ellenére továbbra is alkalmazandók, amennyiben ezek a szabályok olyan intézkedésekre vonatkoznak, amelyek végrehajtását 2008. augusztus 1-jét megelőzően már elkezdték.
 (3)
 A 2008. augusztus 1. előtt felhalmozott boralkoholkészleteket értékesíteni kell. Következésképpen a 479/2008/EK rendelet 128. cikke (3) bekezdésének b) pontjában és az 555/2008/EK rendelet 103. cikke (1) bekezdésének a) pontjában foglaltaknak megfelelően az 1493/1999/EK rendelet 31. cikke és az 1623/2000/EK rendelet IV. fejezete továbbra is alkalmazandó erre az intézkedésre.
 (4)
 Az 1623/2000/EK rendelet meghatározza többek között az 1493/1999/EK rendelet 27., 28. és 30. cikke szerinti lepárlással előállított, az intervenciós hivatalok birtokában lévő alkoholkészletek értékesítésére vonatkozó részletes alkalmazási szabályokat.
 (5)
 Az 1623/2000/EK rendelet 80. cikkével összhangban pályázati eljárást kell indítani a boralkohol új ipari célokra történő felhasználása céljából, az uniós boralkoholkészletek csökkentése, valamint kis volumenű ipari projektek Unión belüli megvalósításának lehetővé tétele érdekében. A tagállamokban tárolt uniós boralkoholkészlet az 1493/1999/EK rendelet 27., 28. és 30. cikke szerinti lepárlással előállított mennyiségekből áll.
 (6)
 Indokolt a végső felhasználás típusa szerint differenciáltan meghatározni az ajánlatokban felkínálható minimálárat.
 (7)
 Az e rendeletben előírt intézkedések összhangban vannak a mezőgazdasági piacok közös szervezésével foglalkozó irányítóbizottság véleményével,
 ELFOGADTA EZT A RENDELETET:
 1. cikk
 (1) E rendelettel, amely az 1623/2000/EK rendelet 81. cikke szerinti ajánlati felhívásról szóló értesítésnek tekintendő, új ipari célokra történő felhasználásra szánt boralkohol értékesítésére irányuló pályázati eljárás indul.
 A pályázati eljárás hivatkozási száma: 01/2011 EU.
 Az alkoholt az 1493/1999/EK rendelet 27., 28. és 30. cikke szerinti lepárlással nyerték és jelenleg Ciprus és Magyarország intervenciós hivatalai tárolják.
 (2) Az eladásra kínált összmennyiség 61 834,8931 hektoliter 100 térfogat-százalékos alkohol. A tartályok számát és tárolásuk helyét, valamint az egyes tartályokban tárolt 100 térfogat-százalékos alkohol mennyiségét a melléklet tartalmazza.
 2. cikk
 Az értékesítésre az 1623/2000/EK rendelet 79., 81., 82., 83., 84., 85., 96., 97., 98., 99., 100., 101. és 102. cikkében foglalt rendelkezéseknek megfelelően kerül sor.
 3. cikk
 (1) Az ajánlatokat a szóban forgó alkoholt tároló érintett intervenciós hivatalokhoz kell benyújtani:
 A magyar intervenciós hivatal:
 Mezőgazdasági és Vidékfejlesztési Hivatal
 1095 Budapest, Soroksári út 22–24.
 Telefon: +36 12196260. Fax: +36 15771317
 Levelezési cím: 1385 Budapest 62. Pf. 867.
 E-mail: ertekesites@mvh.gov.hu
 Honlap: http://www.mvh.gov.hu/
 A ciprusi intervenciós hivatal:
 Wine Products Council
 86 Franklin Roosevelt str.
 Petra Business Centre
 3011 Limassol
 Cyprus
 E-mail: extaff@wpc.org.cy
 Honlap: http://www.wpc.org.cy/en_index.html
 (2) Az ajánlatot tartalmazó borítékot le kell zárni és fel kell tüntetni rajta az „Ajánlattétel – Az új ipari célokra történő felhasználásra irányuló 01/2011 EU sz. pályázati eljárás” feliratot; ezt a borítékot pedig az érintett intervenciós hivatal címével ellátott borítékban kell elhelyezni.
 (3) Az ajánlatoknak legkésőbb az e rendelet kihirdetésének napjától számított harmadik kedden, brüsszeli idő szerint 12.00 óráig kell beérkezniük az érintett intervenciós hivatalhoz.
 (4) Az ajánlatokhoz csatolni kell a 100 térfogat-százalékos alkohol után hektoliterenként fizetendő 4 EUR összegű ajánlati biztosítéknak az érintett intervenciós hivatalnál való letétbe helyezéséről szóló igazolást.
 4. cikk
 Az ajánlatban minimálisan feltüntetendő ár 5 EUR a 100 térfogat-százalékos alkohol egy hektoliterére vonatkoztatva a kazánházakban és cementgyárakban tüzelőanyagként való felhasználásra szánt alkohol esetében, és 30 EUR a 100 térfogat-százalékos alkohol egy hektoliterére vonatkoztatva az egyéb ipari termékek – többek között fagyálló folyadékok és tisztítószerek – előállítására szánt alkohol esetében.
 5. cikk
 A mintavétellel kapcsolatos alakiságokat az 1623/2000/EK rendelet 98. cikke határozza meg. A minta ára literenként 10 EUR.
 Az intervenciós hivatal rendelkezésre bocsátja az eladásra kínált alkohol jellemzőire vonatkozó valamennyi szükséges információt.
 6. cikk
 A teljesítési biztosíték összege 30 EUR a 100 térfogat-százalékos alkohol egy hektoliterére számítva.
 7. cikk
 Ez a rendelet az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapjában való kihirdetését követő harmadik napon lép hatályba.
 Ez a rendelet teljes egészében kötelező és közvetlenül alkalmazandó valamennyi tagállamban.
 Kelt Brüsszelben, 2011. július 1-jén.
 a Bizottság részéről, az elnök nevében,
 Dacian CIOLOŞ
 a Bizottság tagja
 (1) HL L 179., 1999.7.14., 1. o.
 (2) HL L 154., 2009.6.17., 1. o.
 (3) HL L 148., 2008.6.6., 1. o.
 (4) HL L 179., 1999.7.14., 1. o.
 (5) HL L 170., 2008.6.30., 1. o.
 (6) HL L 194., 2000.7.31., 45. o.
 MELLÉKLET
 AZ ALKOHOL ÚJ IPARI CÉLOKRA TÖRTÉNŐ FELHASZNÁLÁSÁRA IRÁNYULÓ 01/2011 EU sz. PÁLYÁZATI ELJÁRÁS
 Az eladásra kínált alkohol tárolási helye, mennyisége és jellemzői
 Tagállam
 Helyszín és kapcsolattartó
 A tartályok száma/a tételek száma
 Mennyiség (100 térfogat-százalékos alkohol hektoliterje)
 Az 1493/1999/EK rendelet vonatkozó cikkére való hivatkozás
 Az alkohol típusa
 Alkoholtartalom
 (térfogatszázalékban)
 Magyarország
 Tartalékgazdálkodási Kht.
 Szőke József
 7041 Vajta,
 Kerekerdei telep
 Hrsz. 0179/7
 Tel./fax: +36 25229176
 Megye: Fejér
 T-3
 ALK01
 16 826,9197
 29 + 30
 nyersalkohol
 93–94,5 %
 T-8
 ALK02
 16 129,0143
 29 + 30
 nyersalkohol
 93–94,5 %
 Tartalékgazdálkodási Kht.
 Mihályi Zoltán
 5130 Jászapáti,
 Tanya hrsz. 266
 Tel./fax: +36 57540950
 Megye: Jász-Nagykun-Szolnok
 7
 ALK03
 4 503,8456
 29 + 30
 nyersalkohol
 93–94,5 %
 8
 ALK04
 3 501,0925
 29 + 30
 nyersalkohol
 93–94,5 %
 9
 ALK05
 4 607,8723
 29 + 30
 nyersalkohol
 93–94,5 %
 10
 ALK06
 4 510,6906
 29 + 30
 nyersalkohol
 93–94,5 %
 12
 ALK07
 4 558,2781
 29 + 30
 nyersalkohol
 93–94,5 %
 Összesen
 54 637,7131
 Ciprus
 Wine Products Council
 (Zakaki, Limassol Cyprus)
 4
 1 765,54
 27
 nyersalkohol
 94,23 %
 2
 1 484,27
 27
 nyersalkohol
 92,75 %
 3
 1 229,23
 27
 nyersalkohol
 93,79 %
 5
 1 356,93
 27
 nyersalkohol
 93,03 %
 6
 1 361,21
 27
 nyersalkohol
 93,93 %
 Összesen
 7 197,18
 Mindösszesen
 61 834,8931


type: caselaw

text:
21.9.2013
 IT
 Gazzetta ufficiale dell'Unione europea
 C 274/24
 Ricorso proposto il 2 agosto 2013 — TVR Automotive/UAMI — TVR Italia (TVR)
 (Causa T-398/13)
 2013/C 274/40
 Lingua in cui è stato redatto il ricorso: il tedesco
 Parti
 Ricorrente: TVR Automotive Ltd (Whiteley, Regno Unito) (rappresentante: A. von Mühlendahl e H. Hartwig, avvocati)
 Convenuto: Ufficio per l’armonizzazione nel mercato interno (marchi, disegni e modelli).
 Controinteressata dinanzi alla commissione di ricorso: TVR Italia Srl (Milano, Italia)
 Conclusioni
 La ricorrente chiede che il Tribunale voglia:
 —
 annullare la decisione della seconda commissione di ricorso dell’Ufficio per l’armonizzazione nel mercato interno (marchi, disegni e modelli) del 14 maggio 2013 nel procedimento R 823/2011-2;
 —
 respingere il ricorso proposto il 14 aprile 2013 dalla TVR Italia Srl contro la decisione della divisione di opposizione dell’Ufficio del 14 febbraio 2011, B 313 248;
 —
 condannare alle spese l’Ufficio convenuto e la TVR Italia Srl, qualora questa partecipasse al procedimento.
 Motivi e principali argomenti
 Richiedente il marchio comunitario: TVR Italia Srl
 Marchio comunitario di cui trattasi: marchio figurativo contenente gli elementi verbali «TVR ITALIA» per prodotti e servizi delle classi 12, 25 e 37 — domanda di marchio comunitario n. 5 699 954
 Titolare del marchio o del segno su cui si fonda l’opposizione: la ricorrente
 Marchio e segno su cui si fonda l’opposizione: marchi denominativi nazionale e comunitario «TVR» per prodotti e servizi delle classi 9, 11, 12, 25 e 41
 Decisione della divisione d'opposizione: accoglimento parziale dell’opposizione
 Decisione della commissione di ricorso: annullamento della decisione della divisione d’opposizione e rigetto dell’opposizione
 Motivi dedotti:
 —
 violazione dell’articolo 42, paragrafi 2 e 3, del regolamento n. 207/2009;
 —
 violazione del principio della res iudicata o del ne bis in idem, nonché dell’articolo 42, paragrafo 2, del regolamento n. 207/2009, in combinato disposto con l’articolo 15 del regolamento n. 207/2009


text:
Okres Strakonice je okres v Jihočeském kraji. Jeho dřívějším sídlem bylo město Strakonice. Sousedí s jihočeskými okresy Prachatice, Písek a České Budějovice, plzeňskými okresy Plzeň-jih a Klatovy a středočeským okresem Příbram.
 Geografie
 K 31. prosinci 2003 měl okres celkovou plochu 1 032,08 km2, z toho:
 64,82 % zemědělské pozemky, které z 69,45 % tvoří orná půda (45,02 % rozlohy okresu)
 35,1 % zaujímají ostatní pozemky
 23 % pokrývají lesy
 4 % tvoří vodní plochy
 Největších nadmořských výšek dosahuje terén v Šumavském podhůří (přesněji jeho podcelku Vimperská vrchovina, okrsku Mladotická vrchovina) v jihozápadním cípu okresu. Nejvyšším bodem okresu Strakonice je tak vrchol kopce Zahájený (846, resp. 845,6 m), ležící v katastrálním území Zálesí u Drážova. Druhý nejvyšší vrchol představuje Altán (845, resp. 844,9 m), třetím vrcholem v pořadí je Kůstrý (837, resp. 836,8 m), oba posledně jmenované v k. ú. Víska u Strakonic.
 Blanice
 Lomnice
 Otava
 Volyňka
 Demografické údaje
 Data k 1.1.2019 :
 hustota zalidnění: 68 ob./km2
 59,72 % obyvatel žije ve městech
 Největší obce
 Školství
 (2003)
 Zdravotnictví
 (2003)
 Seznam obcí a jejich částí
 Města jsou uvedena tučně, městyse kurzívou, části obcí .
 Bavorov •
 Bělčice •
 Bezdědovice •
 Bílsko •
 Blatná •
 Bratronice •
 Březí •
 Budyně •
 Buzice • Cehnice •
 Čečelovice •
 Čejetice •
 Čepřovice •
 Čestice •
 Číčenice •
 Doubravice •
 Drahonice •
 Drachkov •
 Drážov •
 Droužetice •
 Dřešín •
 Hajany •
 Hájek •
 Hlupín •
 Horní Poříčí •
 Hornosín •
 Hoslovice •
 Hoštice •
 Chelčice •
 Chlum •
 Chobot •
 Chrášťovice •
 Jinín •
 Kadov •
 Kalenice •
 Katovice •
 Kladruby •
 Kocelovice •
 Krajníčko •
 Kraselov •
 Krašlovice •
 Krejnice •
 Krty-Hradec •
 Kuřimany •
 Kváskovice •
 Lažánky •
 Lažany •
 Libějovice •
 Libětice •
 Litochovice •
 Lnáře •
 Lom •
 Mačkov •
 Malenice •
 Mečichov •
 Měkynec •
 Milejovice •
 Miloňovice •
 Mnichov •
 Mutěnice •
 Myštice •
 Nebřehovice •
 Němčice •
 Němětice •
 Nihošovice •
 Nišovice •
 Nová Ves •
 Novosedly •
 Osek •
 Paračov •
 Pivkovice •
 Pohorovice •
 Pracejovice •
 Předmíř •
 Přední Zborovice •
 Předslavice •
 Přechovice •
 Přešťovice •
 Radějovice •
 Radomyšl •
 Radošovice •
 Rovná •
 Řepice •
 Sedlice •
 Skály •
 Skočice •
 Slaník •
 Sousedovice •
 Stožice •
 Strakonice •
 Strašice •
 Strunkovice nad Volyňkou •
 Střelské Hoštice •
 Škvořetice •
 Štěchovice •
 Štěkeň •
 Tchořovice •
 Truskovice •
 Třebohostice •
 Třešovice •
 Úlehle •
 Únice •
 Uzenice •
 Uzeničky •
 Vacovice •
 Velká Turná •
 Vodňany •
 Volenice •
 Volyně •
 Záboří •
 Zahorčice •
 Zvotoky
 Silniční doprava
 Okresem prochází silnice I. třídy I/4, I/20 a I/22. Silnice II. třídy jsou II/121, II/139, II/140, II/141, II/142, II/144, II/170, II/171, II/172, II/173, II/174, II/175 a II/177.
 Odkazy
 Reference
 Související články
 Seznam katastrálních území v okrese Strakonice
 Seznam chráněných území v okrese Strakonice
 Seznam památných stromů v okrese Strakonice
 Seznam kulturních památek v okrese Strakonice
 Senátní obvod č. 12 - Strakonice
 Externí odkazy
 Strakonice
 Okresy v Česku


type: other

jurisdiction: US

text: b' U.S. Department of Energy\n Office of Inspector General\n Office of Inspections and Special Inquiries\n\n\n\n\nInspection Report\nInternal Controls Over Sensitive\nCompartmented Information Access\nfor Selected Field Intelligence\nElements\n\n\n\n\nDOE/IG-0796 July 2008\n\x0c\x0c\x0cINTERNAL CONTROLS OVER SENSITIVE COMPARTMENTED\nINFORMATION ACCESS FOR SELECTED FIELD\nINTELLIGENCE ELEMENTS\n\n\n\nTABLE OF\nCONTENTS\n\n\n OVERVIEW\n\n Introduction and Objective 1\n\n Observations and Conclusions 2\n\n\n DETAILS OF FINDINGS\n\n Background 3\n\n Database Issues 3\n\n Improper Facility Access 4\n\n Los Alamos SCI Access\n Authorization Termination 6\n\n\n RECOMMENDATIONS 7\n\n\n MANAGEMENT COMMENTS 7\n\n\n INSPECTOR COMMENTS 7\n\n\n APPENDICES\n\n A. Scope and Methodology 8\n\n B. Prior Reports 9\n\n C. Management Comments 10\n\x0cOverview\n\nINTRODUCTION As a member of the U.S. Government\xe2\x80\x99s Intelligence Community,\nAND OBJECTIVE the Department of Energy (DOE) serves as the premier technical\n intelligence resource in the areas of nuclear weapons,\n nonproliferation, energy, science, and technology, as well as\n emerging nuclear threats. In addition to providing intelligence\n analyses, DOE offers specialized technology and operational\n support to both intelligence and law enforcement agencies.\n\n DOE accomplishes its intelligence mission by drawing from\n technical expertise located throughout the Department complex,\n including the national laboratories. This necessitates\n Department-affiliated personnel having access to sensitive\n compartmented information (SCI), which is a designation given to\n classified information derived from intelligence sources, methods,\n or analytical processes that are required to be handled through\n designated access control systems.\n\n DOE\xe2\x80\x99s Office of Intelligence and Counterintelligence is\n responsible for granting SCI access authorization to DOE-affiliated\n personnel who need access to intelligence information.\n Individuals must have an active Top Secret or \xe2\x80\x9cQ\xe2\x80\x9d clearance to be\n granted and maintain SCI access authorization. The Office of\n Intelligence and Counterintelligence maintains an SCI personnel\n database called Lockbox. This database directly \xe2\x80\x9cfeeds\xe2\x80\x9d into and\n supports the official national SCI personnel database. The Office\n of Inspector General recently completed an inspection of internal\n controls associated with the 969 individuals on a DOE\n Headquarters SCI access roster. We identified issues with\n (1) individuals who had left the Department or had been debriefed\n from the SCI program remaining on the Department\xe2\x80\x99s SCI roster\n and (2) the execution of debriefing responsibilities by the Office of\n Intelligence and Counterintelligence.\n\n To complement this inspection, we initiated a review of local Field\n Intelligence Elements that the Office of Intelligence and\n Counterintelligence maintains at several DOE sites in support of its\n intelligence mandate. These field sites have local SCI personnel\n databases, as well as local databases to control physical access\n systems, e.g., badge readers, for local SCI facilities. The objective\n of the inspection was to determine the adequacy of internal\n controls over access to intelligence information at two of these\n Field Intelligence Elements, Los Alamos National Laboratory\n\n\n\nPage 1 Internal Controls Over Sensitive\n Compartmented Information Access\n for Selected Field Intelligence\n Elements\n\x0c (Los Alamos) and Sandia National Laboratories (Sandia).\n According to Lockbox, as of October 1, 2007, there were 2,361\n DOE SCI access holders at these facilities: 856 at Los Alamos and\n 1,505 at Sandia.\n\nOBSERVATIONS AND We concluded that the Office of Intelligence and Counterintelligence\nCONCLUSIONS and the subordinate Field Intelligence Elements at Los Alamos and\n Sandia did not have adequate administrative internal controls over\n their databases used to track SCI access authorizations. Based on\n our comparison of Lockbox and four local databases containing the\n names, authorizations, and facility accesses of Los Alamos and\n Sandia SCI access holders, we found that:\n\n \xe2\x80\xa2 The SCI personnel databases used by the Office of Intelligence\n and Counterintelligence, Los Alamos, and Sandia contained\n numerous errors, including incorrect database entries and\n failures to update information relevant to SCI access, which\n could lead to security incidents such as the one described\n below;\n\n \xe2\x80\xa2 An individual physically accessed a Los Alamos SCI facility\n without escort after her SCI access authorization was\n terminated. Further, Los Alamos Field Intelligence Element\n officials did not report the security incident to the required\n Office of Intelligence and Counterintelligence official; and,\n\n \xe2\x80\xa2 The Los Alamos Field Intelligence Element had not terminated\n the SCI access authorizations of 13 individuals whose\n personnel security clearances had been terminated up to 10\xc2\xbd\n months previously.\n\n We note that in addition to the previously cited review of internal\n controls over SCI access authorizations on a DOE Headquarters\n access roster, other past reviews by the Office of Inspector General\n at Los Alamos and Sandia identified weaknesses in the internal\n controls intended to ensure that security clearances and access\n authorizations were terminated appropriately and expeditiously. A\n list of the associated reports is located at Appendix B.\n\n\n\n\nPage 2 Observations and Conclusions\n\x0cDetails of Findings\n\nBACKGROUND Individuals entering one or more SCI programs go through a series\n of in-processing actions. These actions are outlined in Director of\n Central Intelligence Directive (DCID) No. 6/1 (previously 1/19),\n \xe2\x80\x9cSecurity Policy for Sensitive Compartmented Information and\n Security Policy Manual.\xe2\x80\x9d They include being sponsored, being\n administratively reviewed and approved by Office of Intelligence\n and Counterintelligence officials, receiving one or more video\n briefs, and reviewing Form 4414 (EF), \xe2\x80\x9cSensitive Compartmented\n Information Nondisclosure Agreement.\xe2\x80\x9d After reviewing the form,\n the individual signs and dates it to acknowledge an understanding\n of his/her security responsibilities. The individual also signs and\n dates the \xe2\x80\x9cBrief\xe2\x80\x9d block acknowledging receipt of the required\n briefings. DCID 6/1 states \xe2\x80\x9cFailure to sign an NdA [Nondisclosure\n Agreement] is cause for denial or revocation of existing SCI\n access. The NdA establishes explicit obligations on both the\n government and the individual signer for the protection of SCI.\xe2\x80\x9d\n\n When an individual no longer requires SCI access, the individual is\n to be debriefed on his/her continuing responsibility to safeguard\n SCI information. The individual then reviews the SCI\n Nondisclosure Agreement form and signs and dates the form in the\n \xe2\x80\x9cDebrief\xe2\x80\x9d block. The individual\xe2\x80\x99s SCI access authorization is\n considered to be terminated at this point.\n\n We reviewed five databases. Los Alamos\xe2\x80\x99 and Sandia\xe2\x80\x99s local\n personnel databases were compared with Lockbox to determine if\n information relating to individuals with SCI access authorizations was\n accurate and consistent. The remaining two databases were associated\n with Los Alamos and Sandia SCI facility physical access systems and\n were reviewed to verify that personnel who were recently debriefed\n had not gained unescorted access to Laboratory SCI facilities.\n\nDATABASE ISSUES We found that the SCI personnel databases used by the Office of\n Intelligence and Counterintelligence, Los Alamos, and Sandia\n contained numerous errors, which could lead to security incidents\n such as the one described in the next section. Specifically, we\n identified 103 errors in Lockbox and local Los Alamos and Sandia\n personnel SCI access databases, including incorrect database entries\n and failures to update information relevant to SCI access. Of these\n identified errors:\n\n \xe2\x80\xa2 Six of the Lockbox errors were individuals who still had\n active SCI access authorizations even though they had been\n formally debriefed from SCI programs;\n\n\n\nPage 3 Details of Findings\n\x0c \xe2\x80\xa2 Twenty of the Lockbox errors were individuals who were not\n entered, some for prolonged periods of time, to show that\n they were authorized to access SCI information;\n\n \xe2\x80\xa2 In several instances, Lockbox data boxes were inaccurately\n checked, preventing parties/organizations external to the\n Office of Intelligence and Counterintelligence from viewing\n the correct status of an individual\xe2\x80\x99s actual SCI access\n authorization; and,\n\n \xe2\x80\xa2 In some instances, the local databases contained inaccurate\n entries. For example, both Sandia and Los Alamos had wrong\n debriefing dates, and Sandia had instances where individuals\n whose SCI access requests had been denied or cancelled\n showed as being \xe2\x80\x9cActive\xe2\x80\x9d in the local SCI personnel database.\n (We did not find any evidence that any of these individuals\n had been SCI briefed or given unauthorized access to SCI\n information.)\n\n We were told that some of these errors occurred when the Office of\n Intelligence and Counterintelligence combined four separate\n databases into one, Lockbox, in November 2006. We determined\n that Sandia submitted corrections in August 2007 and Los Alamos\n in October 2007. On December 4, 2007, we found that not all of\n the corrections had been made by the Office of Intelligence and\n Counterintelligence. However, at the conclusion of our inspection,\n all database issues had been corrected at all three locations.\n\n In discussing the accuracy of Lockbox with an Office of Intelligence\n and Counterintelligence senior official, we were told that the office\n had experienced a 300 percent increase in workload the last 2 years\n with no increase in manpower. We were told that this had led to\n delays with inputting SCI access information, delays in correcting\n identified errors, and an inability to perform sufficient quality\n assurance/control on the database.\n\nIMPROPER FACILITY We also found that an individual physically accessed a Los Alamos\nACCESS SCI facility without escort after her SCI access authorization was\n terminated. Further, Los Alamos Field Intelligence Element\n officials did not report the security incident to the required Office\n of Intelligence and Counterintelligence official.\n\n On November 5, 2007, during our review of the Los Alamos SCI\n facility physical access system, we discovered that an individual who\n\n\n\nPage 4 Details of Findings\n\x0c was debriefed from the SCI program on November 8, 2006, gained\n unescorted access to a Los Alamos SCI facility on November 9,\n 2006, contrary to DOE policy. Procedures are supposed to be\n established to remove \xe2\x80\x9can individual\xe2\x80\x99s authorization to enter an area\n when the individual is transferred, terminated, or the individual\xe2\x80\x99s\n access is suspended, revoked, or downgraded to a level below that\n required for entry.\xe2\x80\x9d We immediately reported this previously\n undiscovered incident to Los Alamos officials. We were told that a\n Los Alamos Field Intelligence Element official subsequently\n initiated a telephonic conversation with the former employee.\n Reportedly, the individual told this official that she had returned to\n complete out-processing documentation. Another Los Alamos Field\n Intelligence Element official determined that the individual was able\n to gain access because her badge access authorization was not\n immediately removed from the Element\xe2\x80\x99s SCI facility physical\n access system. Her facility access was not terminated until\n November 13, 2006, and no one had reviewed whether she had\n accessed the facility in the intervening period of time.\n\n We also determined that the Office of Intelligence and\n Counterintelligence Special Security Officer had not been\n informed of the security incident by the Los Alamos Field\n Intelligence Element, as required. After the Office of Inspector\n General identified the issue to the Special Security Officer, the\n Office of Intelligence and Counterintelligence requested additional\n information from Los Alamos. Los Alamos subsequently reported\n to the Special Security Officer that the security lapse occurred due\n to a series of events, to include the checklist executed for departing\n employees being reviewed and initialed as completed prior to\n collection of the employee\xe2\x80\x99s badge and deactivation of the\n employee\xe2\x80\x99s access in the badge reader system.\n\n On January 14, 2008, the Office of Intelligence and\n Counterintelligence received an e-mail from Los Alamos stating\n that action was taken to ensure that no item on the checklist\n executed for departing employees is initialed as completed until\n the action has actually been completed. Based on this notification,\n the Office of Intelligence and Counterintelligence official said that\n all required actions had been completed.\n\n\n\n\nPage 5 Details of Findings\n\x0cLOS ALAMOS Finally, we found that the Los Alamos Field Intelligence Element\nSCI ACCESS had not terminated the SCI access authorizations of 13 individuals\nAUTHORIZATION whose personnel security clearances had been terminated up to\nTERMINATION 10\xc2\xbd months previously. This appeared to be the result of the\n Element not having an effective means of being kept apprised of\n employee and personnel security clearance terminations.\n Specifically, the Element only had limited coordination with the Los\n Alamos entities handling employee and personnel security clearance\n terminations. In contrast, we noted that the Sandia Field Intelligence\n Element had taken actions to improve its integrated controls by\n establishing daily coordination with Sandia\xe2\x80\x99s Human Resources\n organization.\n\n We also observed that this condition has the potential to result in the\n over-use of \xe2\x80\x9cadministrative debriefings\xe2\x80\x9d by the Element.\n Administrative debriefings, which entail an authorized official\n annotating the SCI Nondisclosure Agreement with \xe2\x80\x9cUnavailable for\n Signature/Administrative Debrief,\xe2\x80\x9d are only supposed to be used\n when all means to properly inform an individual of his/her\n continuing SCI access responsibilities have failed. The overuse of\n administrative debriefings has been cited in previous Office of\n Inspector General reports. We identified seven administrative\n debriefings at Los Alamos during this current review. Los Alamos\n contended that it only executed an administrative debriefing when it\n had exhausted identified methods to contact the individual to obtain\n a signature. While this may be true, we believe that Los Alamos\n might have more success actually debriefing individuals if it had\n more timely notification of individuals\xe2\x80\x99 departure.\n\n A Los Alamos Field Intelligence Element official acknowledged\n that a week or a month could pass without his office being notified\n concerning the termination of an employee who had SCI access.\n He said that sometimes his office was not even notified of an\n individual\xe2\x80\x99s death. He also acknowledged that there were other\n Laboratory organizations that could assist with this issue. We\n believe that the Los Alamos Field Intelligence Element should\n coordinate with appropriate Laboratory organizations, such as the\n Human Resources and Personnel Security offices, in order to\n strengthen internal controls over SCI access authorizations.\n\n\n\n\nPage 6 Details of Findings\n\x0cRECOMMENDATIONS We recommend that the Director, Office of Intelligence and\n Counterintelligence, ensures that:\n\n 1. SCI access authorization information is processed in Lockbox\n in an accurate, timely, and complete manner.\n\n 2. Lockbox and local databases are subjected to a periodic quality\n assurance/control regimen.\n\n 3. Los Alamos Field Intelligence Element officials receive\n refresher training concerning security incidents, with specific\n emphasis on security incident reporting.\n\n 4. The Los Alamos Field Intelligence Element establishes\n procedures with other Laboratory organizations to obtain\n timely notification concerning the termination of Laboratory\n personnel and personnel security clearances in order to ensure\n the timely termination of SCI access authorizations and\n minimize administrative debriefings.\n\nMANAGEMENT In comments on a draft of this report, the Office of Intelligence and\nCOMMENTS Counterintelligence concurred with the report recommendations.\n Management identified corrective actions that have been or will be\n taken to address our recommendations. Management\xe2\x80\x99s comments\n are included in their entirety at Appendix C.\n\nINSPECTOR We consider management\xe2\x80\x99s comments to be generally responsive\nCOMMENTS to our recommendations.\n\n\n\n\nPage 7 Recommendations\n Management and Inspector Comments\n\x0cAppendix A\n\nSCOPE AND We conducted our inspection fieldwork between September and\nMETHODOLOGY December 2007. We looked at the Field Intelligence Elements that\n were administered in association with Los Alamos and Sandia.\n We interviewed officials from the Office of Intelligence and\n Counterintelligence, Los Alamos, and Sandia regarding DOE and\n local SCI-related policy, standard operating procedures, paper\n files, and electronic databases. We reviewed applicable Director\n of Central Intelligence; National Nuclear Security Administration\n Service Center; Office of Intelligence and Counterintelligence; and\n Laboratory policies, procedures, electronic databases, and paper\n files.\n\n We also compared five databases, three concerning SCI personnel\n access authorizations and two concerning physical access to SCI\n facilities; reviewed relevant Field Intelligence Element-related SCI\n personnel data entries; and in the case of SCI facility access,\n conducted a judgmental sample involving recently debriefed SCI\n access authorized personnel. At Los Alamos, we reviewed 76 of\n 143 database files concerning SCI debriefed individuals and SCI\n facility access; and at Sandia, 100 of 195. During our inspection,\n we observed operations at Los Alamos and Sandia National\n Laboratory-New Mexico SCI facilities, and we reviewed data for\n both of these sites as well as for Sandia National Laboratory-\n California.\n\n Also, pursuant to the \xe2\x80\x9cGovernment Performance and Results Act\n of 1993,\xe2\x80\x9d we determined the Los Alamos and Sandia contractual\n performance measure processes did not address access control\n issues relating to the Field Intelligence Elements or their\n operations. However, the Office of Intelligence and\n Counterintelligence and DOE\xe2\x80\x99s Office of Independent Oversight\n evaluate a number of physical security topics that relate to Field\n Intelligence Element operations.\n\n This inspection was conducted in accordance with the \xe2\x80\x9cQuality\n Standards for Inspections\xe2\x80\x9d issued by the President\xe2\x80\x99s Council on\n Integrity and Efficiency.\n\n\n\n\nPage 8 Scope and Methodology\n\x0cAppendix B\n\nPRIOR REPORTS The following Office of Inspector General reports involved work related\n to this inspection:\n\n \xe2\x80\xa2 \xe2\x80\x9cOffice of Intelligence and Counterintelligence Internal Controls\n Over the Department of Energy\xe2\x80\x99s Sensitive Compartmented\n Information Access Program\xe2\x80\x9d (DOE/IG-0790, March 2008);\n\n \xe2\x80\xa2 \xe2\x80\x9cBadge Retrieval and Security Clearance Termination at Sandia\n National Laboratory-New Mexico\xe2\x80\x9d (DOE/IG-0724, April 2006);\n and,\n\n \xe2\x80\xa2 \xe2\x80\x9cSecurity and Other Issues Related to Out-Processing of\n Employees at Los Alamos National Laboratory\xe2\x80\x9d (DOE/IG-0677,\n February 2005).\n\n\n\n\nPage 9 Prior Reports\n\x0cAppendix C\n\n\n\n\nPage 10 Management Comments\n\x0cAppendix C\n\n\n\n\nPage 11 Management Comments\n\x0cAppendix C\n\n\n\n\nPage 12 Management Comments\n\x0cAppendix C\n\n\n\n\nPage 13 Management Comments\n\x0c IG Report No. DOE/IG-0796\n\n\n\n CUSTOMER RESPONSE FORM\n\nThe Office of Inspector General has a continuing interest in improving the usefulness of its\nproducts. We wish to make our reports as responsive as possible to our customers\xe2\x80\x99 requirements,\nand, therefore, ask that you consider sharing your thoughts with us. On the back of this form,\nyou may suggest improvements to enhance the effectiveness of future reports. Please include\nanswers to the following questions if they are applicable to you:\n\n1. What additional background information about the selection, scheduling, scope, or\n procedures of the inspection would have been helpful to the reader in understanding this\n report?\n\n2. What additional information related to findings and recommendations could have been\n included in the report to assist management in implementing corrective actions?\n\n3. What format, stylistic, or organizational changes might have made this report\xe2\x80\x99s overall\n message clearer to the reader?\n\n4. What additional actions could the Office of Inspector General have taken on the issues\n discussed in this report, which would have been helpful?\n\n5. Please include your name and telephone number so that we may contact you should we have\n any questions about your comments.\n\n\nName Date\n\nTelephone Organization\n\n\nWhen you have completed this form, you may telefax it to the Office of Inspector General at\n(202) 586-0948, or you may mail it to:\n\n Office of Inspector General (IG-1)\n Department of Energy\n Washington, DC 20585\n\n ATTN: Customer Relations\n\nIf you wish to discuss this report or your comments with a staff member of the Office of\nInspector General, please contact Judy Garland-Smith at (202) 586-7828.\n\x0cThe Office of Inspector General wants to make the distribution of its reports as customer friendly\nand cost effective as possible. Therefore, this report will be available electronically through the\n Internet at the following address:\n\n U.S. Department of Energy Office of Inspector General Home Page\n\n http://www.ig.energy.gov\n\n Your comments would be appreciated and can be provided on the Customer Response Form\n attached to the report.\n\x0c'


type: contracts

text:
 Avis juridique important
 |
 21999A1214(04)
 Ændringerne til protokollen om forebyggelse af forurening af Middelhavet fra skibe og luftfartøjer ikke officiel oversættelse
 EF-Tidende nr. L 322 af 14/12/1999 s. 0041 - 0043
 AMENDMENTS TO THE PROTOCOL FOR THE PREVENTION OF POLLUTION OF THE MEDITERRANEAN SEA BY DUMPING FROM SHIPS AND AIRCRAFTA. TitleThe title of the Protocol is amended as follows: "PROTOCOL FOR THE PREVENTION AND ELIMINATION OF POLLUTION OF THE MEDITERRANEAN SEA BY DUMPING FROM SHIPS AND AIRCRAFT OR INCINERATION AT SEA".B. Preambular paragraphsThe second preambular paragraph of the Protocol is amended as follows: "RECOGNISING the danger posed to the marine environment by the dumping or incineration of wastes or other matter.".The fourth preambular paragraph of the Protocol is amended as follows: "BEARING IN MIND that Chapter 17 of Agenda 21 of UNCED calls on the Contracting Parties to the Convention on the Prevention of Marine Pollution by Dumping of Wastes and other Matter (London, 1972) to take the necessary measures to end dumping in the ocean and the incineration of hazardous substances.".The following paragraph is added to the Preamble: "TAKING INTO ACCOUNT Resolutions LC 49(16) and LC 50(16), approved by the 16th Consultative Meeting of the 1972 London Convention, which prohibit the dumping and incineration of industrial wastes at sea.".C. Article 1Article 1 is amended as follows: "The Contracting Parties to this Protocol (hereinafter referred to as 'the Parties') shall take all appropriate measures to prevent, abate and eliminate to the fullest extent possible pollution of the Mediterranean Sea caused by dumping from ships and aircraft or incineration at sea."D. Article 2Article 2 is amended as follows: "The area to which this Protocol applies shall be the Mediterranean Sea Area as defined in Article 1 of the Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment and the Coastal Region of the Mediterranean (hereinafter referred to as 'the Convention')."E. Article 3The following new subparagraphs are added to Article 3: "3(c) Any deliberate disposal or storage and burial of wastes or other matter on the seabed or in the marine subsoil from ships or aircraft." "4(bis) (renumbered as 5) 'Incineration at sea' means the deliberate combustion of wastes or other matter in the maritime waters of the Mediterranean Sea, with the aim of thermal destruction and does not include activities incidental to the normal operations of ships or aircraft."Paragraph 5 is renumbered as paragraph 6.F. Article 4Article 4 is amended as follows: "1. The dumping of wastes or other matter, with the exception of those listed in paragraph 2 of this Article, is prohibited.2. The following is the list referred to in the preceding paragraph:(a) dredged material;(b) fish waste or organic materials resulting from the processing of fish and other marine organisms;(c) vessels, until 31 December 2000;(d) platforms and other man-made structures at sea, provided that material capable of creating floating debris or otherwise contributing to pollution of the marine environment has been removed to the maximum extent, without prejudice to the provisions of the Protocol concerning Pollution Resulting from Exploration and Exploitation of the Continental Shelf, the Seabed and its Subsoil.(e) inert uncontaminated geological materials the chemical constituents of which are unlikely to be released into the marine environment."G. Article 5Article 5 is amended as follows: "The dumping of the wastes or other matter listed in Article 4(2) requires a prior special permit from the competent national authorities."H. Article 6Article 6 is amended as follows: "1. The permit referred to in Article 5 shall be issued only after careful consideration of the factors set forth in the Annex to this Protocol or the criteria, guidelines and relevant procedures adopted by the meeting of the Contracting Parties pursuant to paragraph 2 below;2. The Contracting Parties shall draw up and adopt criteria, guidelines and procedures for the dumping of wastes or other matter listed in Article 4(2) so as to prevent, abate and eliminate pollution."I. Article 7Article 7 is amended as follows: "Incineration at sea is prohibited."J. Article 9Article 9 is amended as follows: "If a Party in a critical situation of an exceptional nature considers that wastes or other matter not listed in Article 4(2) of this Protocol cannot be disposed of on land without unacceptable danger or damage, above all for the safety of human life, the Party concerned shall forthwith consult the Organisation. The Organisation, after consulting the Parties to this Protocol, shall recommend methods of storage or the most satisfactory means of destruction or disposal under the prevailing circumstances. The Party shall inform the Organisation of the steps adopted in pursuance of these recommendations. The Parties pledge themselves to assist one another in such situations."K. Article 10Subparagraph 1(a) of Article 10 is amended as follows: "(a) issue the permits provided for in Article 5;".Subparagraph 1(b) of Article 10 is deleted.Subparagraph 1(c) is renumbered as subparagraph 1(b).Paragraph 2 is amended as follows: "2. The competent authorities of each Party shall issue the permits provided for in Article 5 in respect of the wastes or other matter intended for dumping:".L. Article 11Paragraph 2 of Article 11 is deleted.M. Article 14Paragraph 3 of Article 14 is amended as follows: "3. The adoption of amendments to the Annex to this Protocol pursuant to Article 17 of the Convention shall require a three-fourths majority vote of the Parties.".N. Annex IAnnex I is deleted.O. Annex IIAnnex II is deleted.P. Annex IIIAnnex III is changed to Annex and is amended as follows: "ANNEXThe factors to be considered in establishing criteria governing the issue of permits for the dumping of matter at sea taking into account Article 6 include:..."