text:
 14.12.2012
 PL
 Dziennik Urzędowy Unii Europejskiej
 L 342/38
 ROZPORZĄDZENIE WYKONAWCZE KOMISJI (UE) NR 1201/2012
 z dnia 13 grudnia 2012 r.
 zmieniające ceny reprezentatywne oraz kwoty dodatkowych ceł przywozowych w odniesieniu do niektórych produktów w sektorze cukru, ustalone rozporządzeniem wykonawczym (UE) nr 892/2012 na rok gospodarczy 2012/2013
 KOMISJA EUROPEJSKA,
 uwzględniając Traktat o funkcjonowaniu Unii Europejskiej,
 uwzględniając rozporządzenie Rady (WE) nr 1234/2007 z dnia 22 października 2007 r. ustanawiające wspólną organizację rynków rolnych oraz przepisy szczegółowe dotyczące niektórych produktów rolnych („rozporządzenie o jednolitej wspólnej organizacji rynku”) (1),
 uwzględniając rozporządzenie Komisji (WE) nr 951/2006 z dnia 30 czerwca 2006 r. ustanawiające szczegółowe zasady wykonania rozporządzenia Rady (WE) nr 318/2006 w odniesieniu do handlu z państwami trzecimi w sektorze cukru (2), w szczególności jego art. 36 ust. 2 akapit drugi zdanie drugie,
 a także mając na uwadze, co następuje:
 (1)
 Kwoty cen reprezentatywnych oraz dodatkowych ceł stosowanych przy przywozie cukru białego, cukru surowego oraz niektórych syropów zostały ustalone na rok gospodarczy 2012/2013 rozporządzeniem wykonawczym Komisji (UE) nr 892/2012 (3). Ceny te i cła zostały ostatnio zmienione rozporządzeniem wykonawczym Komisji (UE) nr 1103/2012 (4).
 (2)
 Dane, którymi dysponuje obecnie Komisja, stanowią podstawę do korekty wymienionych kwot, zgodnie z art. 36 rozporządzenia (WE) nr 951/2006.
 (3)
 Ze względu na konieczność zapewnienia, że środek ten będzie mieć zastosowanie możliwie jak najszybciej po udostępnieniu aktualnych danych, niniejsze rozporządzenie powinno wejść w życie z dniem jego opublikowania,
 PRZYJMUJE NINIEJSZE ROZPORZĄDZENIE:
 Artykuł 1
 Ceny reprezentatywne i dodatkowe cła mające zastosowanie przy przywozie produktów, o których mowa w art. 36 rozporządzenia (WE) nr 951/2006, ustalone na rok gospodarczy 2012/2013 rozporządzeniem wykonawczym (UE) nr 892/2012, zostają zmienione i są zamieszczone w załączniku do niniejszego rozporządzenia.
 Artykuł 2
 Niniejsze rozporządzenie wchodzi w życie z dniem jego opublikowania w Dzienniku Urzędowym Unii Europejskiej.
 Niniejsze rozporządzenie wiąże w całości i jest bezpośrednio stosowane we wszystkich państwach członkowskich.
 Sporządzono w Brukseli dnia 13 grudnia 2012 r.
 W imieniu Komisji, za Przewodniczącego,
 José Manuel SILVA RODRÍGUEZ
 Dyrektor Generalny ds. Rolnictwa i Rozwoju Obszarów Wiejskich
 (1) Dz.U. L 299 z 16.11.2007, s. 1.
 (2) Dz.U. L 178 z 1.7.2006, s. 24.
 (3) Dz.U. L 263 z 28.9.2012, s. 37.
 (4) Dz.U. L 327 z 27.11.2012, s. 22.
 ZAŁĄCZNIK
 Zmienione kwoty cen reprezentatywnych i dodatkowych ceł przywozowych dla cukru białego, cukru surowego oraz produktów objętych kodem CN 1702 90 95, mające zastosowanie od dnia 14 grudnia 2012 r.
 (w EUR)
 Kod CN
 Kwota ceny reprezentatywnej za 100 kg netto produktu
 Kwota dodatkowego cła za 100 kg netto produktu
 1701 12 10 (1)
 33,26
 1,17
 1701 12 90 (1)
 33,26
 4,63
 1701 13 10 (1)
 33,26
 1,31
 1701 13 90 (1)
 33,26
 4,93
 1701 14 10 (1)
 33,26
 1,31
 1701 14 90 (1)
 33,26
 4,93
 1701 91 00 (2)
 38,40
 6,03
 1701 99 10 (2)
 38,40
 2,82
 1701 99 90 (2)
 38,40
 2,82
 1702 90 95 (3)
 0,38
 0,29
 (1) Odnosi się do jakości standardowej określonej w pkt III załącznika IV do rozporządzenia (WE) nr 1234/2007.
 (2) Odnosi się do jakości standardowej określonej w pkt II załącznika IV do rozporządzenia (WE) nr 1234/2007.
 (3) Stawka dla zawartości sacharozy wynoszącej 1 %.


type: caselaw

jurisdiction: EU

text:
12.3.2011
 IT
 Gazzetta ufficiale dell'Unione europea
 C 80/14
 Domanda di pronuncia pregiudiziale proposta dal Tribunale di Palermo (Italia) il 5 gennaio 2011 — Procedimento penale a carico di Fabio Caronna
 (Causa C-7/11)
 2011/C 80/26
 Lingua processuale: l’italiano
 Giudice del rinvio
 Tribunale di Palermo
 Parti nella causa principale
 Fabio Caronna
 Questioni pregiudiziali
 1)
 se il comma 2 dell’art. 77 della direttiva 2001/83/CE (1) intenda dire che anche i farmacisti devono munirsi dell’autorizzazione per la distribuzione all’ingrosso di medicinali ovvero se l’intento del legislatore comunitario fosse comunque quello di esentare i farmacisti dal richiedere tale autorizzazione, come sembra di capire dalla lettura del considerando n. 36;
 2)
 quale sia la corretta interpretazione da darsi alla disciplina dell’autorizzazione alla distribuzione di medicinali prevista dagli artt. 76-84 della direttiva 2001/83/CE, con particolare riferimento ai requisiti richiesti perché il farmacista (inteso quale persona fisica e non come società), per questa sua qualità già autorizzato a vendere medicinali al dettaglio dall’ordinamento nazionale, possa effettuare anche la distribuzione dei medicinali.
 (1) GU 2001, L 311, pag. 67.


type: wikipedia

text:
Viktor Kaplan, křtěný Viktor Gustav František (27. listopadu 1876 Mürzzuschlag, Rakousko-Uhersko – 23. srpna 1934 Unterach am Attersee, Rakousko) byl rakouský inženýr a vynálezce Kaplanovy turbíny. Své klíčové objevy učinil na svém působišti na německé technice (dnes VUT) v Brně.
 Život
 Viktor Kaplan se narodil jako syn železničního úředníka. Do základní školy chodil v Neubergu and der Mürz a potom pokračoval na reálném gymnáziu ve Vídni. Ještě mu nebylo ani deset, když si vyrobil elektromotorek, zkonstruoval funkční model parního stroje a na řece Mürz vyzkoušel vlastní rukou zhotovené malé vodní kolo. Jako středoškolák se pustil do výroby fotoaparátu.
 V letech 1895–1900 vystudoval Technickou vysokou školu ve Vídni, kde studoval stavbu strojů a Dieselových motorů. Po škole strávil jeden rok vojenské služby v Pule, tehdy významné základně rakousko-uherského námořnictva. V roce 1901 začal pracovat ve strojírnách patřících firmě Ganz & Comp v Leobersdorfu u Vídně na spalovacích motorech.
 Po dvou letech však odešel na žádost profesora Alfréda Musila (otce Roberta Musila) na německou vysokou školu technickou v Brně, jako konstruktér ústavu nauky o strojích, kinematice a strojnictví. Opustil práci na výbušném motoru a začal se věnovat konstrukci vodní turbíny.
 V roce 1909 byl Kaplan promován doktorem technických věd na Technické vysoké škole ve Vídni a také se habilitoval pro vodní motory na německé Technické vysoké škole v Brně. Zároveň si téhož roku, 18. července, vzal za manželku vídeňskou rodačku Margaretu Strasserovou, s níž měl dvě dcery (Gertraud Karola Antonia Kaplanová a Margaretta Reinfrieda Kaplanová). Roku 1913 se stal vedoucím katedry teorie a stavby vodních motorů. Kaplan zůstal v Brně i po vzniku Československa a roku 1918 byl jmenován řádným profesorem Vysoké školy technické.
 Od roku 1912, kdy přihlásil k patentování svůj první vynález vodní turbíny, měl Kaplan problémy s obhájením 33 dalších patentů, které se k ní vztahovaly. Musel bránit své vynálezy a podstoupit mnoho sporů, které se vlekly až do poloviny 20. let. Po dvanáctiletém právním sporu bylo na základě rozsudku říšského soudu v Lipsku Kaplanovi uděleno 280 patentů ve 27 státech. Patentová agenda a příslušné písemnosti zabraly 14 500 listů, které s pozůstalostí přešly do fondu Technického muzea v Brně. Z velkého psychického vypětí Kaplan v roce 1922 těžce onemocněl a i když se po čase vrátil k pedagogické činnosti, nemoc zanechala stopy na jeho psychické kondici. V roce 1931 na vlastní žádost odešel do předčasného důchodu a usadil se na své venkovské usedlosti Rochuspoint v Unterachu v Horních Rakousích. V posledních letech života se věnoval realizaci drobných zlepšovacích návrhů a svým zálibám, kterými byly hudba a chov domácích zvířat.
 V roce 1926 získal čestný doktorát na Vysoké škole technické v Praze a roku 1934 na Vysoké škole technické v Brně. Druhého čestného doktorátu se však nedožil, neboť zemřel 23. srpna 1934 na mozkovou mrtvici ve svém letním sídle Rochuspoint v Rakousku.
 Výročí jeho narození patří od roku 1976 mezi světová kulturní výročí UNESCO. Památník Viktora Kaplana je součástí expozice Vodní motory v Technickém muzeu v Brně.
 Dílo
 Kaplan prováděl v Brně množství pokusů, aby popsal nejvhodnější parametry Francisových turbín a modifikoval je pro různé hodnoty průtoků a spádů. Po pěti letech práce shrnul své poznatky v knížce Bau rationeller Francisturbinen–Laufräder und deren Schaufelformen für Schnell–, Normal– und Langsam Läufer. Jeho vynález vodní turbíny s nastavitelnými oběžnými lopatkami, se datuje do roku 1912. Kaplan na ní začal pracovat v roce 1910. Tehdy byla v Brně zřízena za podpory slévárny a strojírny Ignaz Storek vlastněné Heinrichem Storkem laboratoř, ve které prováděl své pokusy. V malé sklepní místnosti pracoval sám nebo se svým asistentem Ing. Jaroslavem Slavíkem. Zde rozšiřoval mezilopatkové kanály Francisovy turbíny, až nakonec dospěl k oběžnému kolu svým tvarem připomínající lodní šroub, ale s natáčivými lopatkami. Natáčením lopatek oběžného kola podle měnícího se průtoku vody se optimálně nastavují nátokové úhly vodního proudu a je tak zachována vysoká účinnost turbíny i při mnohem nižším průtoku.
 Objev světového významu nevznikal hladce a narážel na nepochopení a často i odpor firem vyrábějících Francisovy turbíny. Přesto v letech 1912–1914 přihlásil Kaplan postupně k patentování čtyři vynálezy. S příchodem první světové války se vynálezcova situace nijak nezlepšila a patentové spory jej velmi vysilovaly. Dlouhá léta vedl spor se švýcarským expertem Robertem Dubsem nebo americkou firmou Allis Chalmers. Kaplanova turbína se tak dočkala svého patentu až v roce 1920. Ale již v roce 1918 započala výroba turbíny podle Kaplanových návrhů a výpočtů v brněnské továrně Ignaz Storek (dnes Šmeral Brno a.s.). Tato turbína byla uvedena do provozu v roce 1919 v přádelnách ve Velmu (Dolní Rakousy), kde pracovala až do roku 1952. V roce 1931 byly spuštěny čtyři obří kaplanovy turbíny (průměr 7 metrů, výkon 35 MW) v hydroelektrárně Ryburg-Schwörstadt na řece Rýnu na německo-švýcarské hranici. Celkem zde zhotovili více než 500 kusů turbín. Kromě Československa byly instalovány v Brazílii, Dánsku, Francii, Holandsku, Itálii, Belgii a dalších státech.
 Technické muzeum ve Vídni získalo první Kaplanovu turbínu do svých sbírek a instalovalo ji v roce 1960 jako technickou památku světového významu před hlavní budovou.
 Ocenění
 V roce 1954 byl Viktor Kaplan oceněn Medailí Rudolfa Diesela.
 Odkazy
 Reference
 Literatura
 Externí odkazy
 Kaplanova turbína vznikla ve sklepní laboratoři.
 ceskatelevize.cz/Okřídlená hřídel
 Pedagogové vysokých škol v Česku
 Čeští Židé
 Rakousko-uherští Židé
 Rakouští Židé
 Rakouští inženýři
 Strojní inženýři
 Židovští vynálezci
 Držitelé čestných doktorátů ČVUT
 Lidé z Brna
 Narození 1876
 Narození 27. listopadu
 Narození ve Štýrsku
 Úmrtí 1934
 Úmrtí 23. srpna
 Úmrtí v Rakousku
 Zemřelí na cévní mozkovou příhodu
 Muži
 Rakouští vynálezci
 Čeští vynálezci
 Rakušané českého původu


type: other

text:
Lei n.o 96/2015 - Diário da República n.o 159/2015, Série I de 2015-08-17 - 17 de Agosto de 2015 - Diário da República - Legislação - VLEX 580112482
 Regula a disponibilização e a utilização das plataformas eletrónicas de contratação pública e transpõe o artigo 29.o da Diretiva 2014/23/UE, o artigo 22.o e o anexo IV da Diretiva 2014/24/UE e o artigo 40.o e o anexo V da Diretiva 2014/25/CE, do Parlamento Europeu e do Conselho, de 26 de fevereiro de 2014, revogando o Decreto -Lei n.o 143 -A/2008, de 25 de julho.
 1 - A presente lei regula a disponibilização e a utilização das plataformas eletrónicas de contratação pública, abreviadamente designadas por plataformas eletrónicas, previstas no Código dos Contratos Públicos (CCP), aprovado pelo Decreto -Lei n.o 18/2008, de 29 de janeiro, estabelecendo os requisitos e as condições a que as mesmas devem obedecer e a obrigação de interoperabilidade com o Portal dos Contratos Públicos e com outros sistemas de entidades públicas.
 Para efeitos da presente lei entende -se por:
 «Acesso», a obtenção de direitos para visualizar ou processar informação, com base na identificação digital do utilizador, através de um terminal, a um procedimento ou processo a que se refere a informação e o estado ou fase do mesmo;
 5984 b) «Empresa gestora», a pessoa coletiva que se encontra
 apta a exercer, nos termos da presente lei, a atividade de gestão e exploração de plataformas eletrónicas;
 «Interessados», todos os que manifestam interesse nos procedimentos através da inscrição nos mesmos;
 «Interoperabilidade», a capacidade das plataformas eletrónicas para permutar informação preservando o seu significado, ou prestar serviços, diretamente e de forma satisfatória, entre os respetivos sistemas e os seus utilizadores, bem como para operar com eles de forma efetiva; e) «Plataforma eletrónica», a infraestrutura tecnológica constituída por um conjunto de aplicações, meios e serviços informáticos necessários ao funcionamento dos procedimentos eletrónicos de contratação pública nacional, sobre a qual se desenrolam os referidos procedimentos;
 «Serviços de certificação eletrónica», a disponibilização de certificados qualificados para efeitos de produção de assinaturas eletrónicas qualificadas e de selos temporais de validação cronológica;
 «Submissão da proposta», «submissão da candidatura» ou «submissão da solução», o momento em que o concorrente ou candidato efetiva a entrega da proposta, da candidatura ou da solução, após o respetivo carregamento em plataforma eletrónica.
 Liberdade de escolha dos prestadores e dos serviços de certificação eletrónica
 1 - As entidades adjudicantes e os operadores económicos escolhem livremente os prestadores e os serviços de
 certificação eletrónica que pretendem utilizar no âmbito dos procedimentos de formação de contratos públicos.
 Coadjuvar o membro do Governo da tutela na definição das linhas estratégicas relacionadas com a contratação pública eletrónica, incluindo a emissão de pareceres e a elaboração de projetos de legislação neste domínio;
 Emitir as licenças necessárias ao exercício da atividade de gestão de plataformas eletrónicas;
 Assegurar a monitorização e o acompanhamento da atividade das plataformas eletrónicas, nomeadamente através da elaboração de relatórios estatísticos;
 Assegurar a fiscalização da atividade das plataformas eletrónicas.
 Credenciar os auditores de segurança das plataformas eletrónicas;
 Credenciar, na marca nacional e grau confidencial, os membros dos órgãos de administração e fiscalização, os empregados e representantes das empresas gestoras com acesso aos atos e instrumentos de gestão das mesmas, os sócios da sociedade e, tratando -se de sociedade anónima, os acionistas com participação igual ou superior a 10 % do capital da sociedade;
 Credenciar as plataformas eletrónicas;
 Identificar as normas internacionais aplicáveis, designadamente as previstas no n.o 3 do artigo 43.o e no n.o 5 do artigo 52.o
 3 - Os pedidos de credenciação previstos na alínea c) do número anterior podem ser apresentados diretamente ao GNS ou, em alternativa, ao IMPIC, I. P., conjuntamente com os pedidos de licenciamento previstos no n.o 1 do artigo 14.o, que os reencaminha, de imediato, ao GNS.SECÇÃO II Meios humanos e técnicos
 Administrador de segurança, com a responsabilidade global de implementar as políticas e práticas de segurança;
 Administrador de sistemas, autorizado a instalar, configurar e manter os sistemas, mas com acesso limitado às configurações e aspetos relacionadas com a segurança; c) Operador de sistemas, sendo responsável por operar diariamente os sistemas, autorizado a realizar cópias de segurança e operações de rotina;
 Auditor de sistemas, autorizado a monitorizar os arquivos de atividade dos sistemas e registo de eventos para auditoria.
 Não realizar auditorias à mesma plataforma eletrónica em mais do que três anos consecutivos;
 Não realizar auditorias sempre que se verifique qualquer situação que possa comprometer a sua independência;
 Não ter prestado serviços de consultoria à empresa gestora nos últimos três anos, nem manter com esta qualquer outro acordo ou vínculo contratual.
 5 - Se, da aplicação do n.o 2 resultar que não existem auditores de segurança credenciados pelo GNS disponíveis, o GNS...
 Despacho n.o 24025/2002(2aSérie), de 12 de Novembro de 2002


text:
 12.9.2016
 HR
 Službeni list Europske unije
 C 335/25
 Presuda Suda (osmo vijeće) od 7. srpnja 2016. (zahtjev za prethodnu odluku koji je uputio Krajský soud v Ostravě – Češka Republika) – Ivo Muladi protiv Krajský úřad Moravskoslezského kraje
 (Predmet C-447/15) (1)
 ((Zahtjev za prethodnu odluku - Transport - Direktiva 2003/59/EZ - Obveza posjedovanja početne kvalifikacije - Članak 4. - Stečena prava - Vozači čije su vozačke dozvole izdane prije datuma predviđenih u članku 4. - Izuzeće od obveze posjedovanja početne kvalifikacije - Nacionalni propis koji postavlja dodatni zahtjev prethodnog periodičnog osposobljavanja u trajanju od 35 sati da bi se moglo koristiti izuzeće))
 (2016/C 335/33)
 Jezik postupka: češki
 Sud koji je uputio zahtjev
 Krajský soud v Ostravě
 Stranke glavnog postupka
 Tužitelj: Ivo Muladi
 Tuženik: Krajský úřad Moravskoslezského kraje
 Izreka
 Članak 4. Direktive 2003/59/EZ Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća od 15. srpnja 2003. o početnim kvalifikacijama i periodičnom osposobljavanju vozača određenih cestovnih vozila za prijevoz robe ili putnika, o izmjeni Uredbe Vijeća (EEZ) br. 3820/85 i Direktive Vijeća 91/439/EEZ te stavljanju izvan snage Direktive Vijeća 76/914/EEZ treba tumačiti na način da mu se ne protivi nacionalni propis poput onoga iz glavnog postupka, sukladno kojem se predviđa obveza prethodnog periodičnog osposobljavanja u trajanju od 35 sati za korisnike izuzeća od obveze postojanja početne kvalifikacije vozača određenih cestovnih vozila za prijevoz robe ili putnika, predviđenog tim člankom, da bi mogli obavljati dotičnu prijevozničku djelatnost.
 (1) SL C 389, 23. 11. 2015.


jurisdiction: US

text:
 249 Md. 263 (1968)
 239 A.2d 82
 THE BOARD OF LIQUOR LICENSE COMMISSIONERS OF BALTIMORE CITY
 v.
 LEONE, ET AL.
 [No. 216, September Term, 1967.]
 Court of Appeals of Maryland.
 Decided March 8, 1968.
 The cause was argued before HAMMOND, C.J., and HORNEY, *264 MARBURY, BARNES, McWILLIAMS, FINAN and SINGLEY, JJ.
 Anthony M. Carey, Assistant Attorney General, and Jon F. Oster, Assistant Attorney General, with whom was Francis B. Burch, Attorney General on the brief, for appellant.
 John Brockenbrough Fox, with whom was David A. Hyman on the brief, for appellees.
 SINGLEY, J., delivered the opinion of the Court.
 The Board of Liquor License Commissioners of Baltimore City (the Board) is provided for by Maryland Code (1957) Art. 2B, § 148. The Board consists of three members appointed biennially by the Governor, with the advice and consent of the Senate. The chairman is designated by the Governor. § 155 (d) of the Act fixes the salaries of Board members and the chairman and authorizes the Board to appoint an executive secretary and fix his salary, subject to approval by the State Comptroller. § 63 (d) provides for the payment, by the Mayor and City Council of Baltimore, from license fees collected, of the salaries and expenses of the Board and its employees, as approved by the State Comptroller.
 The Board is vested with authority to approve the issuance of licenses for the sale of alcoholic beverages (§ 60); to adopt rules and regulations limiting the number of licenses (§ 42); to renew licenses (§ 68); and to revoke and suspend them (§ 69). The Board is given "full power and authority to adopt such reasonable rules and regulations as [it] may deem necessary to enable [it] effectively to discharge the duties imposed upon [it] * * *." (§ 184 (a)). Failure of a licensee to comply with the rules or regulations of the Board makes revocation or suspension mandatory (§ 69).
 On 23 June 1967, the Board adopted Rule 3 (e):
 "No licensee, except the holder of a Class `C' (Club) license, shall, directly or indirectly, refuse, withdraw from, or deny to any persons the services, accommodations, advantages, facilities and privileges offered on *265 said licensee's premises on the grounds of race, color, creed or national origin."
 The appellees, duly licensed bar owners in Baltimore, on 28 June 1967, filed in the Baltimore City Court a petition for a declaratory judgment in which they challenged the validity of Rule 3 (e), assigning, among their reasons, the Board's failure to comply with the rule- and regulation-making provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act (the APA), Maryland Code (1965 Repl. Vol.), Art. 41, §§ 244-256. The Board moved to dismiss on the grounds that the Board was not a state agency to which the APA applied and that no justiciable controversy was presented. The lower court overruled the motion to dismiss, and on 20 July 1967, entered an order declaring that a justiciable controversy existed; that the Board was a state agency within the meaning of the APA; and that Rule 3 (e) was invalid in consequence of the failure of the Board to comply with the APA in the adoption of the rule.
 The Board appealed, contending that the appellees' petition raised no justiciable controversy, and that the Board was not a state agency subject to the APA. This was the posture in which the case was presented to us in the briefs filed by the parties and in oral argument. Under our view of the case, we do not reach the appellant's contentions. Maryland Rule 835 permits this Court, on its own motion, to dismiss an appeal not allowed by law.[1]
 In Miles v. McKinney, 174 Md. 551, 199 A. 540 (1938), the Board of Zoning Appeals of the City of Baltimore attempted to appeal from an order of the Baltimore City Court which had reversed an order of the Zoning Board. Judge Offutt, speaking for this Court, pointed out that the Zoning Board, *266 which exercised quasi-judicial and quasi-legislative functions, "has no interest, personal or official, in the matters which come before it other than to decide them according to the law and the proved fact, and it is in no sense a party to such proceedings." 174 Md. at 561, 199 A. at 544.
 After pointing out that certain boards and agencies, charged with the execution of public policy, are specifically charged by the legislature with the duty of participating in litigation affecting their decisions,[2] Judge Offutt continued, 174 Md. at 562, 199 A. at 545:
 "Apart from the legislative authority, it would seem clear that the Board has no more right to appeal from its own decisions to the Baltimore City Court, or, from the decisions of that court to the Court of Appeals, than a justice of the peace or such an agency as the State Industrial Accident Commission, would have to appeal from judgments of a court reversing their decisions."
 See, Annotation of McKinney, 117 A.L.R. 216 and cases there cited; Adler v. M. & C.C. of Baltimore, 242 Md. 329, 219 A.2d 22 (1966); Nuova Realty Co. v. M. & C.C. of Baltimore, 197 Md. 266, 78 A.2d 765 (1951); Roeder v. Brown, 192 Md. 639, 65 A.2d 333 (1949); Knox v. M. & C.C. of Baltimore, 180 Md. 88, 23 A.2d 15 (1941).
 The Board counters with the contention that Liquor License Board v. Keswick, 227 Md. 598, 177 A.2d 869 (1962) would seem to lend support to the theory that it may appeal from an adverse decision of a lower court. The Board can gain neither comfort nor support from the Keswick case, where the appeal was dismissed for another and equally valid reason: i.e., the absence of a variance required by Code (1957) Art. 2B, § 175 (f) for an appeal to lie to this Court. Pearce v. Board of Liquor License Commrs., 228 Md. 515, 180 A.2d 651 (1962); Gianforte v. Board of License Commrs. for Baltimore City, 190 Md. 492, 58 A.2d 902 (1948).
 *267 Now we turn to a consideration of the provisions of Code (1957, 1968 Replacement Vol.) Art. 2B, § 175 relating to appeals from the Board.[3] From a careful reading of the section, it is apparent that the legislative intent was to severely limit the *268 right of appeal.[4] The action of the Board restricting a license or licensee may be appealed by the licensee to the Baltimore City Court. There is a presumption that the Board's action was proper and in the public interest, and the petitioner has the burden of proving that it was otherwise. The decision of the court is final, and no further appeal lies to this Court, except under the limited conditions described in subsection (f). Nowhere is there an intimation that an appeal by the Board to this *269 Court will lie, and this conclusion is strengthened by the grant of authority in subsection (e) (2) authorizing the Board to be represented in the hearing in the lower court. Had the legislature intended to permit the Board to appeal from a reversal of its own decision, we are convinced it would have said so.
 In the trial of the case below, and in the case before us, the Board vigorously argued that it was not subject to the provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act. Although a determination of this contention is not necessary to our decision in this case, the Board would have been in no better position before us had it attempted to invoke the APA. As Judge (later Chief Judge) Henderson, speaking for the Court, said in Md. Pharmacy Board v. Peco, 234 Md. 200, 202-03, 198 A.2d 273 (1964):
 "Code (1963 Supp.), Art. 43, sec. 268(d) provides for an appeal by any person to whom the Board has refused to issue a permit, or whose permit has been revoked, but it does not authorize any appeal by any other person. It is conceded, however, that the Board is an `agency' as defined in Code (1963 Supp.), Art. 41, sec. 244 of the Administrative Procedure Act, and that the provisions of that Act are applicable. Sec. 255(a) provides: `Right to review.  Any party aggrieved by a final decision in a contested case, * * * is entitled to judicial review thereof under this subtitle.' Sec. 256 provides: `An aggrieved party may secure a review of any final judgment of the circuit court by appeal to the Court of Appeals.' Code (1957), Art. 5, sec. 1 provides that `[a]ny party may appeal to the Court of Appeals from any final judgment or determination of a court of law in any civil suit or action, * * *.'
 "It is well settled that the provisions of Art. 5, sec. 1 do not apply to cases where the trial court exercises a special or limited jurisdiction conferred by statute. Simpler v. State, Use of Boyd, 223 Md. 456, 460, and cases cited. We are not here concerned with the *270 exception where the trial court exceeds its jurisdiction. Bd. of Med. Examiners v. Steward, 203 Md. 574, 580. We think it is clear that the trial court had jurisdiction and did not exceed its statutory authority in reaching its decision on the law and the facts. It is also well settled that in cases where the trial court's power to review depends upon a statute, we must look to the statute to determine who may appeal. The question, then, is whether the Board can be considered an `aggrieved party.'
 "The Board's function in acting upon an application for permit under the statute is quasi-judicial and not adversary. It is only a party in the circuit court for the purpose of producing the record (cf. sec. 255(d) and Maryland Rule B 7), or notifying the parties `to the proceeding before it.' (Sec. 254 and Rule B2 d) Under sec. 255 (b) the trial court may `permit other interested persons to intervene.' In Zoning Appeals Board v. McKinney, 174 Md. 551, 564, it was said: `Since therefore the Board [of Zoning Appeals] is not a party to this proceeding, has no interest in it different from that which any judicial or quasi judicial agency would have, which is to decide the cases coming before it fairly and impartially, [it] is in no sense aggrieved by the decision of the Baltimore City Court, * * *.' See also Mayor & C.C. of Balto. v. Shapiro, 187 Md. 623 and Roeder v. Brown, 192 Md. 639. It may also be noted that the same phrase is used in sec. 255(a) and in that context it could not apply to the Board, for the Board could hardly be `aggrieved' by its own decision. Moreover the Legislature, in using the phrase, presumably was well aware of its interpretation by this Court in the cases cited. Had the Legislature desired to enlarge the right of appeal it could easily have done so."
 We are aware that in the field of administrative law, agencies may have duties which are quasi-legislative as well as quasi-judicial. This is a distinction which the APA recognizes by *271 setting up different procedures to be followed in the promulgation of rules and regulations on the one hand and the hearing of contested cases on the other.[5]Compare Code (1965 Repl. Vol.) Art. 41, §§ 245-50 with Code (1965 Repl. Vol.) Art. 41, §§ 251-56. We do not intend that this reference to the APA should be taken as a determination by us that the Board is included within the definition of an "agency" to which the APA is applicable. Code (1965 Repl. Vol.) Art. 41, § 244(a). However, if we assume, arguendo, that the Board, in promulgating rules and regulations, was subject to the APA, we find statutory warrant for an appeal to this Court only by an aggrieved party in a contested case. Code (1965 Repl. Vol.) Art. 41, § 256; Md. Pharmacy Board v. Peco, supra. Since the Act contains no specific provision relating to appellate review of rules and regulations, it can hardly be argued that a standard different from or less restrictive than that which governs contested cases could be implied.
 We conclude that the Board's appeal was not allowed by law and should therefore be dismissed as provided in Maryland Rule 835.
 Appeal dismissed; costs to be paid by appellant.
 NOTES
 [1] Rule 835. Dismissal of appeal
 a. By the Court
 * * *
 2. Any Other Cause.
 This Court may, on its own motion, dismiss an appeal for any cause set forth in section b of this Rule.
 b. On Motion
 * * *
 (1) The appeal is not allowed by law * * *.
 [2] E.g., Public Service Commission, Code (1965 Repl. Vol.) Art. 78, §§ 90-93; State Department of Assessments and Taxation, Code (1965 Repl. Vol.) Art. 81, § 232 (13).
 [3] Appeals to courts.
 (a) Generally.  The decision of the board of license commissioners for Baltimore City * * * in approving, suspending, revoking and restricting, or refusing to approve, suspend, revoke or restrict any license, or licensee, shall be subject to appeal in the following manner:
 (b) Who may appeal.  Any licensee or applicant for a license, or any group of not less than ten persons who are residents or real estate owners in the precinct or voting district in which the licensed place of business is located or proposed to be located, may appeal therefrom * * * to the Baltimore City Court, upon payment of all costs incident to the hearing before the local board or local licensing official.
 (c) Stay of local board's order.  Upon the filing of an appeal, the local borad may stay its order until the final determination thereof.
 * * *
 (e) Scope of appeal.  (1) (i) Upon the hearing of such appeal, the action of the local board shall be presumed by the court to be proper and to best serve the public interest. The burden of proof shall be upon the petitioner to show that the decision complained of was against the public interest and that the local board's discretion in rendering its decision was not honestly and fairly exercised, or that such decision was arbitrary, or procured by fraud, or unsupported by any substantial evidence, or was unreasonable, or that such decision was beyond the powers of the board, and was illegal. The case shall be heard by the court without the intervention of a jury. If in the opinion of the court it is impracticable to determine the question presented to the court, in the case on appeal, without the hearing of additional evidence, or if in the opinion of the court any qualified litigant has been deprived of the opportunity to offer evidence, or if the interests of justice otherwise require that further evidence should be taken, the court may hear such additional testimony to such extent and in such manner as may be necessary.
 * * *
 (2) In such actions of appeal the local board or the local licensing official involved may be represented by some qualified attorney designated for such service by said board or official.
 (3) The failure of the court to determine an appeal within a period of 30 days after the record has been filed in court by the local board as above provided, shall constitute an automatic affirmance of the local board's decision, unless the time has been extended by the court for good cause shown.
 (4) (i) If the court reverses the action of the local board it shall file with the papers a written statement of the reasons therefor. The court may modify, as well as affirm or reverse, the action of the local board. Costs shall be awarded as in other civil cases.
 * * *
 (f) Finality of appeal.  The decision of the court thus given shall be final and effective at once. No further appeal shall lie to the Court of Appeals of the State, nor shall there be any other remedy by which the local board's decision may be reviewed in court, either by way of mandamus, injunction, certiorari or otherwise. However, if any judge of the circuit court of any county, or the Baltimore City Court, shall in any case finally decide a point of law at variance with any decision previously rendered by any other judge of the State on the same question, an appeal may be taken from the decision rendered to the Court of Appeals of Maryland. Any such appeal shall not stay the action of the lower court. The Court of Appeals shall only decide the question of law involved in such an appeal and shall not pass upon any question of fact.
 [4] The legislature, of course, cannot deny the right of judicial review where there has been illegal or unconstitutional administrative action. Heaps v. Cobb, 185 Md. 372, 379, 45 A.2d 73 (1945); Cohen, Some Aspects of Maryland Administrative Law, 24 Md. L. Rev. 1, 36 (1964).
 [5] For definitions of "rule" and "contested case," see Maryland Code (1965 Repl. Vol.) Art. 41, §§ 244(b), (c).


type: legislation

text:
 EIROPAS
 KOMISIJA
 Briselē, 18.5.2015.
 COM(2015) 201 final
 2015/0104 (NLE)
 Priekšlikums
 PADOMES REGULA,
 ar kuru groza Regulu (ES) Nr. 1387/2013, ar ko aptur kopējā muitas tarifa autonomo
 nodokļu piemērošanu konkrētiem lauksaimniecības un rūpniecības ražojumiem
 LV LV
 ---pagebreak--- PASKAIDROJUMA RAKSTS
 1. PRIEKŠLIKUMA KONTEKSTS
 Komisija ar Ekonomikas un tarifu jautājumu darba grupas atbalstu ir izskatījusi visus
 dalībvalstu iesniegtos pieprasījumus uz laiku apturēt kopīgā muitas tarifa autonomo nodokļu
 piemērošanu. Minētajā darba grupā ir visu dalībvalstu un Turcijas delegācijas. Līdz šajā
 priekšlikumā izklāstīto izmaiņu pieņemšanai darba grupai ir bijušas trīs sanāksmes.
 Darba grupa rūpīgi izskatīja katru pieprasījumu (katru jaunu, grozītu vai no iepriekšējām
 sanāksmēm pārceltu pieprasījumu). Izskatot katru lietu, tiek īpaši ņemti vērā tādi faktori kā
 kaitējuma novēršana ES ražotājiem un ES ražošanas nozares konkurētspējas stiprināšana un
 konsolidēšana. Šis izvērtējums notika grupas diskusiju veidā un dalībvalstīm konsultējoties ar
 attiecīgajām ražošanas nozarēm, apvienībām, tirdzniecības palātām un citām iesaistītajām
 ieinteresētajām personām.
 Šis priekšlikums attiecas uz virkni lauksaimniecības un rūpniecības ražojumu. Pieprasījumi
 apturēt nodokļu piemērošanu tika izskatīti, ņemot vērā kritērijus, kas izklāstīti Komisijas
 paziņojumā par autonomo tarifu atcelšanu un kvotām (OV C 363, 13.12.2011., 6. lpp.). Pēc
 minētās izskatīšanas Komisija uzskata, ka nodokļu piemērošanas apturēšana ir pamatota
 ražojumiem, kuri norādīti šā priekšlikuma pielikuma 1) punkta b) apakšpunktā ietvertajā
 tabulā. Šā priekšlikuma pielikuma 1) punkta b) apakšpunktā ietvertajā tabulā ir norādīti arī
 i) ražojumi, kuriem bija jāmaina to apraksta formulējums, un ii) ražojumi, kuriem bija
 vajadzīgs jauns KN vai TARIC kods.
 Ir jāsvītro ražojumi, attiecībā uz kuriem nodokļu piemērošanas apturēšana vairs nav
 Savienības ekonomiskajās interesēs. Attiecīgi, šā priekšlikuma pielikuma 1) punkta
 c) apakšpunktā ietvertajā tabulā ir norādīti no Regulas (ES) Nr. 1387/2013 I pielikuma
 svītrotie ražojumi un tādi ražojumi, kuriem bija jāmaina apraksta formulējums vai ražojumi,
 kuriem bija vajadzīgs jauns KN vai TARIC kods vai kuriem pielikuma 1) punkta
 b) apakšpunktā ietvertajā tabulā ir aizstāts apraksts vai kodi.
 Būtu jāatjaunina attiecīgo papildvienību saraksts Regulas (ES) Nr. 1387/2013 II pielikumā.
 Tādēļ pielikuma 2) punkta a) apakšpunktā ietvertajā tabulā ir iekļauts šā priekšlikuma
 pielikuma 1) punkta b) apakšpunktā minētajā tabulā uzskaitīto ražojumu papildvienību kodu
 saraksts un pievienotā priekšlikuma pielikuma 2) punkta b) apakšpunktā minētajā tabulā ir
 uzskaitīti no iepriekš minētās regulas I pielikuma svītroto ražojumu papildvienību kodi.
 Nobeigumā tiek ierosināts pievienot 1. pantam jaunu punktu, ar kuru stingri ierobežo
 apturēšanas darbības jomu, attiecinot to vienīgi uz Regulas (ES) Nr. 1387/2013 I pielikumā
 aprakstītajiem ražojumiem.
 Priekšlikums ir saskaņā ar tirdzniecības, uzņēmējdarbības, attīstības un ārējo attiecību
 politiku.
 Šis priekšlikums neskar to valstu intereses, kuras ar ES noslēgušas preferenciālās
 tirdzniecības nolīgumus (piemēram, VPS, ĀKK režīms, kandidātvalstis un potenciālās
 kandidātvalstis).
 2. APSPRIEŠANĀS AR IEINTERESĒTAJĀM PERSONĀM UN IETEKMES
 NOVĒRTĒJUMS
 Ir notikusi apspriešanās ar Ekonomikas un tarifu jautājumu darba grupu, kurā pārstāvētas visu
 dalībvalstu kompetentās iestādes. Visi minētie apturēšanas pasākumi ir saskaņā ar vienošanos
 vai kompromisiem, kas panākti darba grupas apspriedēs.
 LV 2 LV
 ---pagebreak--- Netika minēts, ka pastāvētu nopietns risks ar neatgriezeniskām sekām.
 3. PRIEKŠLIKUMA JURIDISKIE ASPEKTI
 Šā regulas priekšlikuma juridiskais pamats ir Līguma par Eiropas Savienības darbību (LESD)
 31. pants.
 No LESD 31. panta izriet, ka autonomo tarifu apturēšanu un kvotas ar kvalificētu balsu
 vairākumu nosaka Padome pēc Komisijas priekšlikuma, tāpēc piemērots instruments ir regula.
 Priekšlikums ir Savienības ekskluzīvā kompetencē. Tāpēc subsidiaritātes principu nepiemēro.
 Priekšlikums atbilst proporcionalitātes principam, jo šis pasākumu kopums atbilst principiem,
 kas noteikti, lai vienkāršotu procedūras ārējā tirdzniecībā iesaistītajiem uzņēmumiem, saskaņā
 ar Komisijas paziņojumu par autonomo tarifu atcelšanu un kvotām (OV C 363, 13.12.2011.,
 6. lpp.).
 4. IETEKME UZ BUDŽETU
 Neiekasēti muitas nodokļi, kuru kopsumma ir aptuveni EUR 43,2 miljoni gadā. Ietekme uz
 budžeta tradicionālajiem pašu resursiem ir EUR 32,4 miljoni gadā (75 % x EUR 43,2 miljoni
 gadā).
 LV 3 LV
 ---pagebreak--- 2015/0104 (NLE)
 Priekšlikums
 PADOMES REGULA,
 ar kuru groza Regulu (ES) Nr. 1387/2013, ar ko aptur kopējā muitas tarifa autonomo
 nodokļu piemērošanu konkrētiem lauksaimniecības un rūpniecības ražojumiem
 EIROPAS SAVIENĪBAS PADOME,
 ņemot vērā Līgumu par Eiropas Savienības darbību un jo īpaši tā 31. pantu,
 ņemot vērā Eiropas Komisijas priekšlikumu,
 tā kā:
 (1) Savienības interesēs ir pilnībā apturēt kopīgā muitas tarifa autonomo nodokļu
 piemērošanu 107 ražojumiem, kuri patlaban nav uzskaitīti Padomes Regulas (ES)
 Nr. 1387/2013 I pielikumā1. Tādēļ šie jaunie ražojumi būtu jāiekļauj minētajā
 pielikumā.
 (2) Savienības interesēs vairs nav saglabāt kopīgā muitas tarifa autonomo nodokļu
 piemērošanas apturēšanu 11 ražojumiem, kas patlaban ir uzskaitīti Regulas (ES)
 Nr. 1387/2013 I pielikumā. Tādēļ šie ražojumi būtu jāsvītro no minētā pielikuma.
 (3) Lai ņemtu vērā ražojumu tehnisko attīstību un ekonomikas tendences tirgū vai lai
 veiktu lingvistiskus pielāgojumus, Regulas (ES) Nr. 1387/2013 I pielikumā ir jāmaina
 apraksts 33 ražojumiem, kuriem apturēta autonomo nodokļu piemērošana. Pēc
 ražojumu specifikāciju padziļinātas pārbaudes būtu jāgroza vēl trīs ražojumu KN kodi.
 Nodokļu piemērošanas apturēšanas gadījumi, attiecībā uz kuriem ir nepieciešami
 grozījumi, būtu jāsvītro no Regulas (ES) Nr. 1387/2013 I pielikumā iekļautā to
 ražojumu saraksta, kuriem apturēta autonomo nodokļu piemērošana, un minētajā
 sarakstā no jauna būtu jāiekļauj nodokļu apturēšanas gadījumi, attiecībā uz kuriem ir
 veikti grozījumi.
 (4) Skaidrības labad grozītie ieraksti būtu jāatzīmē ar zvaigznīti.
 (5) Lai būtu iespējams veikt pienācīgu statistisko pārraudzību, Regulas (ES)
 Nr. 1387/2013 II pielikums būtu jāpapildina ar papildvienībām dažiem jaunajiem
 ražojumiem, attiecībā uz kuriem ir piešķirta nodokļu piemērošanas apturēšana.
 Konsekvences labad papildvienības, kas piešķirtas ražojumiem, kuri svītroti no
 Regulas (ES) Nr. 1387/2013 I pielikuma, būtu jāsvītro arī no minētās regulas
 II pielikuma.
 (6) Būtu jāprecizē, ka Regulas (ES) Nr. 1387/2013 I pielikums neattiecas uz maisījumiem,
 preparātiem vai produktiem, kas sastāv no dažādiem komponentiem, kuri satur
 ražojumus, kam piemēro autonomo tarifu atcelšanu.
 (7) Tādēļ Regula (ES) Nr. 1387/2013 būtu attiecīgi jāgroza.
 1
 Padomes 2013. gada 17. decembra Regula (ES) Nr. 1387/2013, ar ko aptur kopējā muitas tarifa
 autonomo nodokļu piemērošanu konkrētiem lauksaimniecības un rūpniecības ražojumiem un atceļ
 Regulu (ES) Nr. 1344/2011 (OV L 354, 28.12.2013., 201. lpp.).
 LV 4 LV
 ---pagebreak--- (8) Saskaņā ar īpašiem administratīviem pasākumiem šajā regulā paredzētajiem
 grozījumiem jāstājas spēkā no 2015. gada 1. jūlija. Šī regula būtu jāpiemēro no minētā
 datuma,
 IR PIEŅĒMUSI ŠO REGULU.
 1. pants
 Regulu (ES) Nr. 1387/2013 groza šādi:
 1) regulas 1. pantu aizstāj ar šādu pantu:
 "1. pants
 1. Attiecībā uz I pielikumā uzskaitītajiem lauksaimniecības un rūpniecības
 ražojumiem tiek piemērota kopējā muitas tarifa autonomo nodokļu apturēšana.
 2. Šā panta 1. punktu nepiemēro maisījumiem, preparātiem vai produktiem, kas
 sastāv no dažādiem komponentiem, kuri satur I pielikumā uzskaitītos
 ražojumus.";
 2) regulas I un II pielikumu groza, kā noteikts šīs regulas pielikumā.
 2. pants
 Šī regula stājas spēkā divdesmitajā dienā pēc tās publicēšanas Eiropas Savienības Oficiālajā
 Vēstnesī.
 To piemēro no 2015. gada 1. jūlija.
 Šī regula uzliek saistības kopumā un ir tieši piemērojama visās dalībvalstīs.
 Briselē,
 Padomes vārdā —
 priekšsēdētājs
 LV 5 LV
 ---pagebreak--- TIESĪBU AKTA PRIEKŠLIKUMA FINANŠU PĀRSKATS
 1. PRIEKŠLIKUMA NOSAUKUMS
 Padomes Regula, ar kuru groza Regulu (ES) Nr. 1387/2013, ar ko aptur kopējā
 muitas tarifa autonomo nodokļu piemērošanu konkrētiem lauksaimniecības un
 rūpniecības ražojumiem
 2. BUDŽETA POZĪCIJAS
 Nodaļa un pants: 12. nodaļas 120. pants
 Summa, kas 2015. budžeta gadā iekļauta budžetā: EUR 16 701 200 000 (2015. gada
 budžets)
 3. FINANSIĀLĀ IETEKME
  Priekšlikumam nav finansiālas ietekmes
 X Priekšlikums finansiāli neietekmē izdevumus, taču tas finansiāli ietekmē
 ieņēmumus, un ietekme ir šāda.
 (miljonos EUR, 1 zīme aiz komata)
 Budžeta Ieņēmumi2 6 mēnešu periods, kas [Gads: 2/2015]
 pozīcija sākas dd/mm/gggg
 120. pants Ietekme uz pašu resursiem 1/7/2015 -16,2
 Stāvoklis pēc rīcības:
 [2015 – 2019]
 120. pants - 32,4 / gadā
 4. KRĀPŠANAS APKAROŠANAS PASĀKUMI
 Pārbaudes par dažu to ražojumu galīgo izmantošanu, uz kuriem attiecas šī Padomes
 regula, tiks veiktas saskaņā ar 291. līdz 300. pantu Komisijas Regulā (EEK)
 Nr. 2454/93, ar ko nosaka Kopienas Muitas kodeksa īstenošanas noteikumus.
 5. CITAS PIEZĪMES
 Šajā priekšlikumā ir ietverti grozījumi, kas izdarāmi spēkā esošās regulas pielikumā,
 lai ņemtu vērā:
 1. jaunus nodokļu piemērošanas apturēšanas pieprasījumus, kas ir iesniegti un
 apstiprināti;
 2
 Tradicionālo pašu resursu (lauksaimniecības nodokļi, cukura nodevas, muitas nodokļi) gadījumā
 jānorāda neto summas, t. i., bruto summas, no kurām atskaitītas iekasēšanas izmaksas 25 % apmērā.
 LV 6 LV
 ---pagebreak--- 2. ražojumu tehnisko attīstību un ekonomikas tendences tirgū, kuru rezultātā tiek
 izbeigta konkrēta spēkā esošo nodokļu piemērošanas apturēšana.
 Pievienošana
 Papildus grozījumiem, kas veikti sakarā ar ražojumu aprakstu vai kodu izmaiņām,
 šajā pielikumā iekļauti 107 jauni ražojumi. Neiekasētie nodokļi, kas atbilst šai
 nodokļu piemērošanas apturēšanai un ir aprēķināti, pamatojoties uz pieprasījumu
 iesniegušo dalībvalstu prognozēm laikposmam no 2015. līdz 2019. gadam, ir
 24,6 miljoni euro gadā.
 Tomēr, pamatojoties uz pieejamajiem statistikas datiem par iepriekšējiem gadiem, šī
 summa būtu jāpalielina par vidējo koeficientu 1,8, lai ņemtu vērā importu citās
 dalībvalstīs, kuras izmanto tādu pašu nodokļu piemērošanas apturēšanu. Tas nozīmē,
 ka neiekasētu nodokļu radītais ieņēmumu zudums būs aptuveni 44,3 miljoni euro
 gadā.
 Svītrošana
 Sakarā ar muitas nodokļu atkārtotu ieviešanu no šā pielikuma svītroti 11 ražojumi.
 Tas veido resursu pieaugumu 1,1 miljonu euro apmērā, kas aplēsts, pamatojoties uz
 2014. gada statistikas datiem.
 Šīs darbības aptuvenās izmaksas
 Pamatojoties uz iepriekš minēto, var aplēst, ka ieņēmumu zaudējumi saistībā ar šo
 regulu ir 44,3 – 1,1 = 43,2 miljoni euro (bruto summa, ietverot iekasēšanas
 izmaksas) x 0,75 = 32,4 miljoni euro gadā laikposmā no 1.7.2015. līdz 31.12.2019.
 Tradicionālo pašu resursu ieņēmumu zaudējums būs jāsedz no dalībvalstu iemaksām,
 pamatojoties uz NKI.
 LV 7 LV
 ---documentbreak--- EIROPAS
 KOMISIJA
 Briselē, 18.5.2015.
 COM(2015) 201 final
 ANNEX 1
 PIELIKUMS
 dokumentam
 Priekšlikums Padomes regulai,
 ar kuru groza Regulu (ES) Nr. 1387/2013, ar ko aptur kopējā muitas tarifa autonomo
 nodokļu piemērošanu konkrētiem lauksaimniecības un rūpniecības ražojumiem
 LV LV
 ---pagebreak--- PIELIKUMS
 Regulu (ES) Nr. 1387/2013 groza šādi:
 1) I pielikumu groza šādi:
 (a) piezīmi starp nosaukumu un tabulu aizstāj ar šādu piezīmi:
 “(*) Nodokļu piemērošanas apturēšana šajā pielikumā minētajam ražojumam, kura KN
 vai TARIC kods vai ražojuma apraksts, vai obligātās pārskatīšanas datums ir grozīti ar
 Padomes Regulu (ES) Nr. 722/2014 (2014. gada 24. jūnijs), ar kuru groza Regulu (ES)
 Nr. 1387/2013, ar ko aptur kopējā muitas tarifa autonomo nodokļu piemērošanu
 konkrētiem lauksaimniecības un rūpniecības ražojumiem (OV L 192, 1.7.2014., 9. lpp.),
 ar Padomes Regulu (ES) Nr. 1341/2014 (2014. gada 15. decembris), ar kuru groza
 Regulu (ES) Nr. 1387/2013, ar ko aptur kopējā muitas tarifa autonomo nodokļu
 piemērošanu konkrētiem lauksaimniecības un rūpniecības ražojumiem, un ar Padomes
 Regulu (ES) Nr. .../2014 (..), ar kuru groza Regulu (ES) Nr. 1387/2013, ar ko aptur
 kopējā muitas tarifa autonomo nodokļu piemērošanu konkrētiem lauksaimniecības un
 rūpniecības ražojumiem (OV ...)”;
 (b) tabulā iekļauj šādus ierakstus par ražojumiem, ievērojot tabulas pirmajā slejā
 norādīto KN kodu secību:
 Autonomā Obligātās
 KN kods TARIC Apraksts muitas pārskatīšanas
 nodokļa likme datums
 *ex 2009 89 73 11 Pasifloras augļu sula un pasifloras augļu sulas koncentrātsgan saldētā, gan nesaldētā 0 % 31.12.2019
 ex 2009 89 73 13 veidā:
 — Briksa grādos izteiktais cukura saturs ir no 13,7 līdz 55,
 — vērtība pārsniedz €30 par 100kg neto svara,
 — tiešajā iepakojumā, kura tilpums ir 50litri vai vairāk, un
 — ar pievienotu cukuru;
 izmanto pārtikas un dzērienu rūpniecības produktu ražošanā
 (1)
 *ex 2009 89 99 94 Kokosriekstu sula 0% 31.12.2016
 — neraudzēta,
 — bez spirta vai cukura piedevas un
 — tiešajā iepakojumā ar 50 l vai lielāku tilpumu
 (2)
 *ex 2207 20 00 20 Izejviela, kas sastāv no (masa procentos): 0% 31.12.2018
 ex 2207 20 00 80 — 88 % vai vairāk, bet ne vairāk kā 92 % etanola,
 ex 3820 00 00 20 — 2,2 % vai vairāk, bet ne vairāk kā 2,7 % monoetilēnglikola,
 — 1,0 % vai vairāk , bet ne vairāk kā 1,3 % metiletilketona,
 — 0,36 % vai vairāk, bet ne vairāk kā 0,40 % anjonu virsmaktīvo vielu (aptuveni
 30 % aktivitāte),
 — 0,0293 % vai vairāk, bet ne vairāk kā 0,0396 % metilizopropilketona,
 — 0,0195 % vai vairāk, bet ne vairāk kā 0,0264 % 5 metil-3-heptanona,
 — 10 ppm vai vairāk, bet ne vairāk kā 12 ppm denatonija benzoāta (bitreksa),
 LV 2 LV
 ---pagebreak--- Autonomā Obligātās
 KN kods TARIC Apraksts muitas pārskatīšanas
 nodokļa likme datums
 — ne vairāk kā 0,01 smaržvielu,
 — 6,5 % vai vairāk, bet ne vairāk kā 8,0 % ūdens,
 izmantošanai stiklu tīrīšanai paredzēta koncentrāta un citu atledošanas preparātu
 ražošanā
 (1)
 ex 2710 19 99 20 Katalītiski no parafīniem attīrīta bāzeļļa, sintezēta no gāzveida ogļūdeņražiem, kam 0 % 31.12.2019
 seko smago parafīnu pārveidošanas process (HPC), un kura satur:
 — ne vairāk kā 1 mg/kg sēra
 — vairāk nekā 99 % pēc masas piesātināto ogļūdeņražu
 — vairāk nekā 75 % pēc masas n- un izoparafīnisko oglūdeņražu ar oglekļa ķēdes
 garumu 18 vai vairāk, bet ne vairāk kā 50 un
 — kuras kinemātiskā viskozitāte pie 40°C ir vairāk nekā 6,5mm2/s vai
 — kuras kinemātiskā viskozitāte pie 40°C ir vairāk nekā 11mm2/s ar viskozitātes
 indeksu 120 vai vairāk
 *ex 2818 10 91 20 Sinterēts korunds ar mikrokristālisku struktūru, kurš sastāv no galvenā komponenta 0 % 31.12.2015
 α-alumīnija oksīda (CAS RN 1344-28-1) un papildkoponentiem magnija alumināta
 (CAS RN 12068-51-8) un itrija, lantāna un neodīma retzemju aluminātiem
 (aprēķināti kā oksīdi), ar šādu saturu:
 — 94 masas % vai vairāk, bet mazāk nekā 98,5 masas % alumīnija oksīda
 — 2 % (± 1,5 %) magnija oksīda,
 — 1 % (± 0,6 %) itrija oksīda,
 un
 — vai nu 2 % (± 1,2 %) lantāna oksīda vai
 — 2 % (± 1,2 %) lantāna oksīda un neodīma oksīda,
 un kurā mazāk par 50 % pēc kopējās masas ir daļiņu, kuru izmērs pārsniedz 10mm
 ex 2827 60 00 10 Nātrija jodīds (CAS RN 7681-82-5) 0% 31.12.2019
 ex 2841 70 00 30 Heksaamonija heptamolibdāts, bezūdens (CAS RN 12027-67-7) vai kā tetrahidrāts 0 % 31.12.2019
 (CAS RN 12054-85-2)
 ex 2903 39 90 35 Pentafluoretāns (CAS RN 354-33-6) 0% 31.12.2019
 ex 2903 79 19 10 Trans-1-hlor-3,3,3-trifluoropropēns (CAS RN 102687-65-0) 0% 31.12.2019
 ex 2904 90 95 80 1-Hlor-2-nitrobenzols (CAS RN 88-73-3) 0% 31.12.2019
 ex 2905 22 00 10 Linalools (CAS RN 78-70-6), kas satur 90,7 masas % vai vairāk (3R)-(-)-linaloola 0 % 31.12.2019
 (CAS RN 126-91-0)
 ex 2907 12 00 30 p-Krezols (CAS RN 106-44-5) 0% 31.12.2019
 ex 2907 29 00 25 4-Hidroksibenzilspirts (CAS RN 623-05-2) 0% 31.12.2019
 ex 2907 29 00 65 2,2'-Metilēnbis(6-cikloheksil-p-krezols) (CAS RN 4066-02-8) 0% 31.12.2019
 ex 2909 60 00 30 3,6,9-Trietil-3,6,9-trimetil-1,4,7-triperoksonāns (CAS RN 24748-23-0), izšķīdināts 0 % 31.12.2019
 izoparafīna ogļūdeņražos
 ex 2914 69 90 50 Reakcijas masa no 2-(1,2-dimetilpropil)antrahinona (CAS RN 68892-28-4) un 2- 0 % 31.12.2019
 (1,1-dimetilpropil)antrahinona (CAS RN 32588-54-8)
 ex 2916 39 90 18 2,4-Dihlorfeniletiķskābe (CAS RN 19719-28-9) 0% 31.12.2019
 ex 2916 39 90 23 (2,4,6-Trimetilfenil)acetilhlorīds (CAS RN 52629-46-6) 0% 31.12.2019
 LV 3 LV
 ---pagebreak--- Autonomā Obligātās
 KN kods TARIC Apraksts muitas pārskatīšanas
 nodokļa likme datums
 ex 2917 39 95 50 1,4,5,8-Naftalēntetrakarbonskābes-1,8-monoanhidrīds (CAS RN 52671-72-4) 0% 31.12.2019
 ex 2917 39 95 60 Perilēn-3,4:9,10-tetrakarbonskābes dianhidrīds (CAS RN 128-69-8) 0% 31.12.2019
 ex 2918 29 00 70 3,5-Dijodsalicilskābe (CAS RN 133-91-5) 0% 31.12.2019
 ex 2918 30 00 70 2-[4-Hlor-3-(hlorsulfonil)benzoil]benzoskābe (CAS RN 68592-12-1) 0% 31.12.2019
 ex 2918 99 90 55 Stearilglicirretināts (CAS RN 13832-70-7) 0% 31.12.2019
 ex 2918 99 90 65 Etiķskābe, difluor[1,1,2,2-tetrafluor-2-(pentafluoretoksi)etoksi]-, amonija sāls 0 % 31.12.2019
 (CAS RN 908020-52-0)
 ex 2918 99 90 75 3,4-Dimetoksibenzoskābe (CAS RN 93-07-2) 0% 31.12.2019
 ex 2921 42 00 40 Nātrija sulfanilāts (CAS RN 515-74-2), arī tā mono- vai dihidrātu formā 0 % 31.12.2019
 (CAS RN 12333-70-0 vai 6106-22-5)
 ex 2922 49 85 55 (E)-Etil 4-(dimetilamino)but-2-enoāta maleāts (CUS 0138070-7) 0% 31.12.2019
 ex 2923 90 00 20 Tetrametilamonija hidrogēnftalāts (CAS RN 79723-02-7) 0% 31.12.2019
 ex 2924 19 00 35 Acetamīds (CAS RN 60-35-5) 0% 31.12.2019
 ex 2924 29 98 23 Benalaksils-M (ISO) (CAS RN 98243-83-5) 0% 31.12.2019
 ex 2924 29 98 33 N-(4-Amino-2-etoksifenil)acetamīds (CAS RN 848655-78-7) 0% 31.12.2019
 ex 2924 29 98 73 Napropamīds (ISO) (CAS RN 15299-99-7) 0% 31.12.2019
 *ex 2927 00 00 35 C.C’-Azodi (formamīds) (CAS RN 123-77-3) dzeltena pulvera veidā ar sadalīšanās 0 % 31.12.2019
 temperatūru 180°C vai augstāku, bet ne augstāku kā 220°C, ko izmanto kā
 putošanas līdzekli termoplastisko sveķu, elastomeru un šķērsšūtā putupolietilēna
 ražošanai
 ex 2928 00 90 13 Cimoksanils (ISO) (CAS RN 57966-95-7) 0% 31.12.2019
 ex 2928 00 90 18 Acetona oksīms (CAS RN 127-06-0), ar tīrību 99 masas % vai vairāk 0% 31.12.2019
 ex 2930 90 99 16 3-(Dimetoksimetilsilil)-1-propāntiols (CAS RN 31001-77-1) 0% 31.12.2019
 *ex 2930 90 99 21 [2,2’-Tio-bis(4-terc-oktilfenolāt)]-n-butilamīna niķelis (CAS RN 14516-71-3) 0% 31.12.2016
 ex 2930 90 99 27 2-[(4-Amino-3-metoksifenil)sulfonil]etilhidrogēnsulfāts (CAS RN 26672-22-0) 0% 31.12.2019
 ex 2930 90 99 33 2-Amino-5-{[2-(sulfooksi)etil]sulfonil}benzolsulfonskābe (CAS RN 42986-22-1) 0% 31.12.2019
 ex 2933 39 99 11 2-(Hlormetil)-4-(3-metoksipropoksi)-3-metilpiridīna hidrohlorīds (CAS RN 153259- 0 % 31.12.2019
 31-5)
 ex 2933 39 99 21 Boskalīds (ISO) (CAS RN 188425-85-6) 0% 31.12.2019
 ex 2933 39 99 31 2-(Hlormetil)-3-metil-4-(2,2,2-trifluoretoksi)piridīna hidrohlorīds (CAS RN 127337- 0 % 31.12.2019
 60-4)
 ex 2933 59 95 10 6-Amino-1,3-dimetiluracils (CAS RN 6642-31-5) 0% 31.12.2019
 LV 4 LV
 ---pagebreak--- Autonomā Obligātās
 KN kods TARIC Apraksts muitas pārskatīšanas
 nodokļa likme datums
 ex 2933 69 80 75 Metamitrons (ISO) (CAS RN 41394-05-2) 0% 31.12.2019
 ex 2933 99 80 11 Fenbukonazols (ISO) (CAS RN 114369-43-6) 0% 31.12.2019
 ex 2933 99 80 12 Miklobutanils (ISO) (CAS RN 88671-89-0) 0% 31.12.2019
 ex 2933 99 80 19 2-(2,4-Dihlorfenil)-3-(1H-1,2,4-triazol-1-il)propān-1-ols (CAS RN 112281-82-0) 0% 31.12.2019
 ex 2934 99 90 10 Fluralaners (INN) (CAS RN 864731-61-3) 0% 31.12.2019
 ex 2934 99 90 16 Difenokonazols (ISO) (CAS RN 119446-68-3) 0% 31.12.2019
 ex 2934 99 90 19 2-[4-(Dibenzo[b,f][1,4]tiazepīn-11-il)piperazīn-1-il] etanols(CAS RN 329216-67-3) 0% 31.12.2019
 ex 2935 00 90 10 Florasulams (ISO) (CAS RN 145701-23-1) 0% 31.12.2019
 ex 3204 12 00 60 Krāsviela C.I. Acid Red 52 (CAS RN 3520-42-1) uz krāsvielas C.I. Acid Red 52 0 % 31.12.2019
 bāzes izgatavotie preparāti, kuri svara izteiksmē satur 97 % vai vairāk šīs krāsvielas
 ex 3204 13 00 50 Krāsviela C.I. Basic Violet 11 (CAS RN 2390-63-8) un uz krāsvielas C.I. Basic 0 % 31.12.2019
 Violet 11 bāzes izgatavotie preparāti, kuri svara izteiksmē satur 90 % vai vairāk šīs
 krāsvielas
 ex 3204 13 00 60 Krāsviela C.I. Basic Red 1:1 (CAS RN 3068-39-1) un uz krāsvielas C.I. Basic Red 0 % 31.12.2019
 1:1 bāzes izgatavotie preparāti, kuri svara izteiksmē satur 90 % vai vairāk šīs
 krāsvielas
 ex 3204 14 00 10 Krāsviela C.I. Direct Black 80 (CAS RN 8003-69-8) un uz krāsvielas C.I. Direct 0 % 31.12.2019
 Black 80 bāzes izgatavotie preparāti, kuri svara izteiksmē satur 90 % vai vairāk šīs
 krāsvielas
 ex 3204 14 00 20 Krāsviela C.I. Direct Blue 80 (CAS RN 12222-00-3) un uz krāsvielas C.I. Direct 0 % 31.12.2019
 Blue 80 bāzes izgatavotie preparāti, kuri svara izteiksmē satur 90 % vai vairāk šīs
 krāsvielas
 ex 3204 14 00 30 Krāsviela C.I. Direct Red 23 (CAS RN 3441-14-3) un uz krāsvielas C.I. Direct 0 % 31.12.2019
 Direct Red 23 bāzes izgatavotie preparāti, kuri svara izteiksmē satur 90 % vai vairāk
 šīs krāsvielas
 ex 3204 17 00 45 Krāsviela "C.I. Pigment Yellow 174" (CAS RN 4118-16-5, ļoti sveķpiesūcināts 0 % 31.12.2018
 pigments (aptuveni 35 % neproporcionālu sveļu ("disproportionate resin")), ar
 tīrības pakāpi 98 % no svara vai augstāku, ekstrudētu lodīšu veidā ar mitruma saturu
 ne vairāk kā 1 % no svara
 ex 3204 17 00 67 Krāsviela "C.I. Pigment Red 57:1 (CAS RN 5281-04-9)" ar tīrības pakāpi 98 % no 0 % 31.12.2018
 svara vai augstāku, ekstrudētu lodīšu veidā ar mitruma saturu maksimāli 1 % no
 svara
 ex 3204 90 00 10 Krāsviela C.I Solvent Yellow 172 (pazīstama arī kā C.I. Solvent Yellow 135) (CAS 0 % 31.12.2019
 RN 68427-35-0) un uz krāsvielas C.I Solvent Yellow 172 (pazīstama arī kā C.I.
 Solvent Yellow 135) bāzes izgatavoti preparāti, kuri masas izteiksmē satur 90 % vai
 vairāk minētās krāsvielas
 ex 3212 10 00 10 Metalizēta plēve, 0% 31.12.2019
 ex 7607 20 90 30 — kura sastāv no vismaz astoņiem alumīnija slāņiem (CAS RN 7429-90-5) ar
 99,8 % vai augstāku tīrības pakāpi,
 — kurā katra alumīnija slāņa optiskais blīvums nav lielāks par 3,0,
 — kurā katrs alumīnija slānis ir atdalīts ar sveķu slāni,
 — uz polietilēntereftalāta nesējloksnes,
 — satīta ruļļos, garumā sasniedz līdz pat 50 000 metrus
 LV 5 LV
 ---pagebreak--- Autonomā Obligātās
 KN kods TARIC Apraksts muitas pārskatīšanas
 nodokļa likme datums
 ex 3808 94 20 30 Bromhlor-5,5-dimetilimidazolidīn-2,4-dions (CAS RN 32718-18-6), kas satur: 0% 31.12.2019
 — 1,3-dihlor-5,5- dimetilimidazolidīn -2,4-dionu (CAS RN 118-52-5),
 — 1,3-dibrom-5,5- dimetilimidazolidīn -2,4-dionu (CAS RN 77-48-5),
 — 1-brom-3-hlor-5,5- dimetilimidazolidīn-2,4-dionu (CAS RN 16079-88-2) un
 — 1-hlor-3-brom-5,5-dimetilimidazolidīn-2,4-dionu(CAS RN 126-06-7)
 ex 3811 21 00 23 Piedevas, kas satur: 0% 31.12.2019
 — polizubutēna sukcinimīdu, kas iegūts no polietilēnpoliamīnu un polizubutenila
 sukcīna anhidrīda (CAS RN 84605-20-9) reakcijas produktiem,
 — minerāleļļas no 31,9 % līdz 43,3 % no svara,
 — hloru ne vairāk kā 0,05 % no masas un
 — kam kopējā sārmainība (TBN) pārsniedz 20,
 izmantojamas ziežeļļām paredzētu piedevu maisījumu ražošanā
 (1)
 *ex 3811 21 00 53 Piedevas, kas satur: 0% 31.12.2019
 — daudzbāzisku kalcija naftas sulfonātu (CAS 68783-96-0), sulfonāta saturs —
 15 masas % vai lielāks, bet ne lielāks kā 30 masas %, un
 — vairāk nekā 40 masas %, bet ne vairāk kā 60 masas % minerāleļļas,
 kam kopējais bāzes skaitlis ir 280 vai lielāks, bet nepārsniedz 420, paredzētas
 izmantošanai ziežeļļu ražošanā
 (1)
 *ex 3811 21 00 73 Piedevas, kas satur: 0% 31.12.2018
 — boru saturošus sukcinimīda savienojumus (CAS RN 134758-95-5),
 — minerāleļļas un
 — kam kopējā sārmainība (TBN) pārsniedz 40,
 paredzētas izmantošanai ziežeļļu ražošanā
 (1)
 ex 3812 30 29 10 4,4’- Izopropilidēndifenil-C12-15-alkilfosfīts, kas satur 1 % līdz 3 % bisfenola A 0 % 31.12.2019
 (CAS RN 96152-48-6) no masas
 ex 3824 90 92 82 T-butilhlorīda dimetilsilāns (CAS RN 18162-48-6) toluola šķīdumā 0% 31.12.2019
 *ex 3824 90 92 83 Preparāts, kas sastāv no vismaz diviem turpmāk minētajiem glikoliem: 0% 31.12.2017
 — dipropilēnglikola,
 — tripropilēnglikola,
 — tetrapropilēnglikola un
 — pentapropilēnglikola
 *ex 3824 90 93 46 Nātrija ūdeņraža 3-aminonaftalīna-1,5-disulfonāts (CAS RN 4681-22-5), kas satur: 0% 31.12.2015
 — ne vairāk kā 20 masas % dinātrija sulfāta,
 — ne vairāk kā 5 masas % nātrija hlorīda
 *ex 3901 10 10 20 Vieglas plūstamības lineāra blīvuma polietilēn-1-butēns(LLDPE) (CAS RN 25087- 0 % 31.12.2019
 ex 3901 90 90 50 34-7) pulvera veidā, ar
 — kausēšanas masas plūsmas ātrumu(MFR 190°C / 2,16 kg) 16g / 10 min vai
 vairāk, bet ne vairāk kā 24g / 10 min,
 — blīvumu (ASTM D 1505) 0,922 g/cm3 vai vairāk, bet ne vairāk kā 0,926 g/cm3
 un
 — vicatmīkstināšanas miniālo temperatūru 94°C
 *ex 3901 10 10 30 Lineārs zema blīvuma polietilēns (LLDPE) (CAS RN 9002-88-4) pulvera veidā, ar 0% 31.12.2018
 — ne vairāk kā 5 masas % komonomēra,
 — kausēšanas masas plūsmas ātrumu 15 g/10 min vai vairāk, bet ne vairāk kā
 60 g/10 min un
 LV 6 LV
 ---pagebreak--- Autonomā Obligātās
 KN kods TARIC Apraksts muitas pārskatīšanas
 nodokļa likme datums
 — blīvumu 0,922 g/cm3 vai vairāk, bet ne vairāk kā 0,928 g/cm3
 *ex 3901 90 90 60 Lineārs zema blīvuma polietilēns (LLDPE) (CAS RN 9002-88-4) pulvera veidā, ar 0% 31.12.2018
 — komonomēru vairāk nekā 5 %, bet ne vairāk kā 8 % no masas,
 — kausēšanas masas plūsmas ātrumu 15 g/10 min vai vairāk, bet ne vairāk kā
 60 g/10 min un
 — blīvumu 0,922 g/cm3 vai vairāk, bet ne vairāk kā 0,928 g/cm3
 *ex 3903 19 00 40 Kristālisks polistirols, kura: 0% 31.12.2016
 — kušanas punkts ir no 268 °C līdz 272 °C,
 — sacietēšanas temperatūra no 232 °C līdz 247 °C,
 — ar piedevām un pildvielām vai bez tām
 ex 3903 90 90 45 Preparāts pulvera veidā, kas satur: 0% 31.12.2019
 — 86 masas % vai vairāk, bet ne vairāk kā 90 masas % stirola-akrila kopolimēra
 un
 — 9 masas % vai vairāk, bet ne vairāk kā 11 masas % taukskābes etoksilāta (CAS
 RN 9004-81-3)
 ex 3903 90 90 55 Preparāts ūdens suspensijas veidā, kas satur: 0% 31.12.2019
 — 25 masas % vai vairāk, bet ne vairāk kā 26 masas % stirola-akrila kopolimēra
 un
 — 5 masas % vai vairāk, bet ne vairāk kā 6 masas % glikola
 ex 3908 90 00 70 Kopolimērs, kas satur: 0% 31.12.2019
 — 1,3-benzoldimetanamīnu (CAS RN 1477-55-0) un
 — adipīnskābi (CAS RN 124-04-9)
 un kas satur vai nesatur izoftalskābi (CAS RN 121-91-5)
 ex 3911 90 19 60 Formaldehīds, polimērs ar 1,3-dimetilbenzolu un terc-butilfenolu (CAS RN 60806- 0 % 31.12.2019
 48-6)
 ex 3911 90 19 70 Preparāts, kas satur: 0% 31.12.2019
 — ciānskābi, C,C'-((1-metiletilidēn)di-4,1-fenilēn)esteri, homopolimēru (CAS RN
 25722-66-1),
 — 1,3-bis(4-ciānfenil)propānu (CAS RN 1156-51-0),
 — butanona šķīdumā (CAS RN 78-93-3) ar saturu, mazāku nekā 50 masas %
 *ex 3912 20 19 10 Nitroceluloze (CAS RN 9004-70-0) 0% 31.12.2016
 *ex 3919 10 80 57 Atstarojoša loksne: 0% 31.12.2018
 ex 3919 90 00 30 • no polikarbonāta vai akrilpolimēra plēves, kas iespiesta uz vienas puses regulāra
 ex 3920 61 00 30 raksta veidā,
 • ar vienu vai vairākiem plastmasas vai metalizētiem slāņiem no vienas vai no abām
 pusēm un
 • ar pašlīmējošu slāni un pretsalipšanas plēvi vienā pusē vai bez tiem
 *ex 3919 10 80 67 Pašlīmējoša atstarojoša loksne, sadalīta vai nesadalīta segmentētos gabalos: 0% 31.12.2018
 ex 3919 90 00 46 — ar regulāras formas rakstiem,
 — ar uzklāšanas lentes slāni vai bez tā,
 — sastāv no poliakrila slāņa, poli(metilmetakrilāta) vai polikarbonāta slāņa ar
 mikroprizmām tajā,
 — ar papildu poliestera slāni vai bez tā un
 — ar adhezīva slāni ar noņemamu aizsargpārklājuma kārtu
 *ex 3919 90 00 48 Caurspīdīga poli(vinilhlorīda) plēve: 0% 31.12.2019
 — no vienas puses pārklāta ar UV-starojuma jutīgu akrila adhezīvu, kam adhēzijas
 LV 7 LV
 ---pagebreak--- Autonomā Obligātās
 KN kods TARIC Apraksts muitas pārskatīšanas
 nodokļa likme datums
 stiprība ir vismaz 70 N/m vai lielāka un kas pie apstarošanas samazinās,
 — ar poliestera aizsargslāni,
 — ar kopējo biezumu bez atdalāma aizsargslāņa 78μm vai lielāku
 ex 3920 10 28 30 Apdrukāta ciļņota plēve: 0% 31.12.2019
 — no etilēna polimēriem,
 — ar blīvumu 0,94 g/cm3 vai lielāku,
 — ar biezumu 0,019 mm (± 0,003 mm),
 — ar paliekošiem grafiskiem attēliem, kas sastāv no diviem dažādiem pamīšus
 izvietotiem zīmējumiem/rakstiem, kuru garums ir 525 mm vai lielāks
 *ex 3920 62 19 60 Poli(etilēntereftalāta) plēve: 0% 31.12.2017
 — kuras biezums nav lielāks kā 20 μm,
 — kura vismaz vienā pusē pārklāta ar gāzu barjeras slāni, kas sastāv no polimēra
 matricē disperģēta silīcija dioksīda vai alumīnija oksīda un kam biezums nav
 lielāks kā 2 μm
 ex 3920 69 00 50 Vienslāņa biaksiāli vērsta plēve: 0% 31.12.2019
 — sastāv no vairāk nekā 85 masas % poli(pienskābes) un ne vairāk kā
 10,50 masas % polimēra uz modificētas poli(pienskābes) bāzes, poliglikola
 estera un talka,
 — ar biezumu 20 μm vai lielāku, bet ne lielāku kā 120 μm,
 — bioloģiski noārdāma un kompostējama (noteikts ar metodi EN 13432)
 ex 3920 69 00 60 Vienslāņa šķērsvirziena termosarukuma plēve: 0% 31.12.2019
 — satur vairāk nekā 80 masas % poli(pienskābes) un ne vairāk kā 15,75 masas %
 modificētas poli(pienskābes) piedevu,
 — ar biezumu 45 μm vai lielāku, bet ne lielāku kā 50 μm,
 — bioloģiski noārdāma un kompostējama (noteikts ar metodi EN 13432)
 ex 3920 79 10 10 Apdrukātu vulkanizētu šķiedru plātņu loksnes ar biezumu, ne lielāku kā 1,5 mm 0% 31.12.2019
 ex 3920 99 28 65 Matēta termoplastiska poliuretāna folija ruļļos: 0% 31.12.2019
 — ar platumu 1640 mm (± 10 mm),
 — ar spīdumu 3,3 grādi vai lielāku, bet ne lielāku kā 3,8 grādi (noteikts ar metodi
 ASTM D2457),
 — ar virsmas raupjumu 1,9 Ra vai lielāku, bet ne lielāku kā 2,8 Ra (noteikts ar
 metodi ISO 4287),
 — ar biezumu lielāku nekā 365 μm, bet ne lielāku kā 760 μm,
 — ar cietību lielāku par 90 (± 4) (noteikts ar metodi Shore A (ASTM D2240)),
 — ar lūzuma pagarinājumu 470 % (noteikts ar metodi EN ISO 527)
 ex 3920 99 28 75 Termoplastiska poliuretāna folija ruļļos: 0% 31.12.2019
 — ar platumu, lielāku nekā 900 mm, bet ne lielāku kā 1016 mm,
 — ar matētu virsmu,
 — ar biezumu 0,43 mm (± 0,03 mm),
 — ar lūzuma pagarinājumu 420 % vai lielāku, bet ne lielāku kā 520 %,
 — ar stiepes izturību 55 N/mm2 (± 3) (noteikts ar metodi EN ISO 527),
 — ar cietību, lielāku par 90 (± 4) (noteikts ar metodi Shore A (ASTM D2240)),
 — ar viļņainību (viļņiem) 6,35 mm,
 — ar plakanību 0,025 mm
 ex 3921 90 60 30 Siltuma, infrasarkanā un ultravioletā starojuma izolācijas poli(vinilbutirāla) plēve: 0% 31.12.2019
 — laminēta ar metāla kārtu, kuras biezums 0,05 mm (± 0,01 mm),
 — satur 29,75 masas % vai vairāk, bet ne vairāk kā 40,25 masas % trietilēnglikola
 di(2-etilheksanoāta), izmantota par plastifikatoru,
 — ar gaismas caurlaidību 70 % vai lielāku (noteikts ar standartu ISO 9050),
 — ar ultravioletā starojuma caurlaidību 1 % vai mazāku (noteikts ar standartu ISO
 9050),
 — ar kopējo biezumu 0,43 mm (± 0,043 mm)
 ex 6804 21 00 10 Diski 0% 31.12.2019
 LV 8 LV
 ---pagebreak--- Autonomā Obligātās
 KN kods TARIC Apraksts muitas pārskatīšanas
 nodokļa likme datums
 — no sintētiskajiem dimantiem, kas papildināti ar metāla, keramikas vai
 plastmasas sakausējumu,
 — ar pašasināšanas funkciju, ko nodrošina pastāvīga dimantu atbrīvošanās,
 — piemēroti plākšņu abrazīvai griešanai,
 — ar caurumu centrā vai bez tā,
 — uz pamatnes vai bez tās
 ex 7409 11 00 10 Rafinēta vara folija un sloksnes, kuru biezums nepārsniedz 400 μm 0% 31.12.2019
 ex 7409 19 00 10
 ex 7410 11 00 20
 *ex 7606 12 92 30 Alumīnija un magnija sakausējuma sloksne vai folija: 0% 31.12.2017
 ex 7607 11 90 50 — ruļļos,
 — ar biezumu no 0,14 mm līdz 0,40 mm,
 — ar platumu no 12,5 mm līdz 359 mm,
 — ar stiepes izturību 285 N/mm2 vai vairāk, un
 — pagarinājumu pie pārraušanas 1 % vai vairāk, un
 ar šādu masas sastāvu:
 — 93,3 % vai vairāk alumīnijs,
 — 0,8 % līdz 5 % magnijs, un
 — ne vairāk kā 1,8 % citu elementu
 *ex 7607 11 90 60 Parastā alumīnija folija, kas atbilst šādiem rādītājiem: 0% 31.12.2016
 — alumīnija saturs 99,98 % vai lielāks
 — biezums 0,070 mm vai vairāk, bet ne vairāk kā 0,125 mm
 — ar kubveida tekstūru
 tāda veida folija, kuru izmanto augstsprieguma kodināšanai
 ex 7616 99 10 30 Dzinēja balstenis no alumīnija, ar šādiem izmēriem: 0% 31.12.2019
 — augstumu, lielāku par 10 mm, bet ne lielāku par 200 mm,
 — platumu, lielāku par 10 mm, bet ne lielāku par 200 mm,
 — garumu, lielāku par 10 mm, bet ne lielāku par 200 mm,
 ar vismaz diviem stiprināšanas caurumiem, izgatavots no alumīnija sakausējumiem
 ENAC-46100 vai ENAC-42100 (pēc normatīva EN:1706), ar šādām īpašībām:
 — iekšējā porainība, ne lielāka par 1 mm;
 — ārējā porainība, ne lielāka par 2 mm;
 — Rokvela cietība HRB 10 vai lielāka,
 izmantojami mehānisko transportlīdzekļu dzinējiem paredzētu balstiekārtu
 amortizatoru ražošanā
 *ex 8108 90 30 50 Titāna, alumīnija un vanādija sakausējuma (TiAl6V4) stieple, kas atbilst AMS 0 % 31.12.2015
 standartam 4928, 4965 un 4967
 ex 8108 90 50 80 Neleģēta titāna plāksnes, loksnes, sloksnes un folija 0% 31.12.2019
 — ar platumu vairāk nekā 750 mm
 — ne biezākas par 3 mm
 ex 8108 90 50 85 Neleģēta titāna sloksnes un folija: 0% 31.12.2019
 — kas satur vairāk nekā 0,07 masas % skābekļa (O2),
 — ar biezumu 0,4 mm vai lielāku, bet ne lielāku kā 2,5 mm,
 — kas atbilstoši Vikersa cietības standartam HV1 nepārsniedz 170,
 ko izmanto metināto cauruļu ražošanā dzesētajiem atomelektrostacijās
 *ex 8409 99 00 30 Spirālveida gāzes turbīnas turbokompresora komponents: 0% 31.12.2018
 ex 8411 99 00 70 — ar siltumizturību izturību, ne lielāku par 1050 °C,
 — ar turbīnas darbratam paredzētās atveres diametru 30 mm vai lielāku, bet ne
 lielāku par 110 mm,
 — ar motora izplūdes gāzes kolektoru vai bez tā
 LV 9 LV
 ---pagebreak--- Autonomā Obligātās
 KN kods TARIC Apraksts muitas pārskatīšanas
 nodokļa likme datums
 *ex 8411 99 00 60 Gāzturbīnas detaļa riteņa formā, ar lāpstiņām, paredzēta izmantošanai 0 % 31.12.2017
 turbokompresoros:
 — izgatavota no niķeļa sakausējuma, kas iegūts ar augstas precizitātes liešanas
 metodi un atbilst standartam DIN G- NiCr13Al16MoNb vai DIN
 NiCo10W10Cr9AlTi, vai AMS AISI:686,
 — ar siltumizturību ne lielāku par 1 100 °C,
 — ar diametru 30 mm vai vairāk, bet ne vairāk par 100 mm,
 — ar augstumu 20 mm vai vairāk, bet ne vairāk par 70 mm
 ex 8479 89 97 70 Iekārta precīzai lēcu centrēšanai un piestiprināšanai kameras blokam, kura spēj veikt 0 % 31.12.2019
 centrēšanu uz piecām asīm, paredzēta to nostiprināšanai pareizā stāvoklī ar epoksīdu
 bāzes divkomponentu ātri cietējošo līmi
 ex 8479 89 97 80 Mehānismi atsevišķi montēta elementa ražošanai (anoda elektriskais vadītājs un 0 % 31.12.2019
 negatīvs pārsegums), sārma bateriju AA vai AAA ražošanai
 (1)
 *ex 8483 30 38 40 Cilindrisks gultņu korpuss: 0% 31.12.2017
 — izgatavots no pelēkā čuguna, kas iegūts ar augstas precizitātes liešanas metodi
 un atbilst standartam DIN EN 1561,
 — ar eļļas kamerām,
 — bez gultņiem,
 — ar diametru 50 mm vai vairāk, bet ne vairāk par 250 mm,
 — ar augstumu 40 mm vai vairāk, bet ne vairāk par 150 mm,
 — arī ar ūdens kamerām un savienotājiem
 ex 8501 32 00 60 Vilces elektromotors ar 0% 31.12.2019
 ex 8501 33 00 15 — spēka momentu 200 Nm vai lielāku, bet ne lielāku kā 300 Nm,
 — ģenerēto jaudu 50 kW vai lielāku, bet ne lielāku kā 100 kW,
 — ātrumu, ne lielāku kā 12 500 apgriezieni minūtē,
 izmantošanai elektrisko transportlīdzekļu ražošanā
 (1)
 ex 8504 40 88 30 Invertors līdzstrāvas pārvēršanai maiņstrāvā, izmantošanai elektrisko 0 % 31.12.2019
 transportlīdzekļu ražošanā vilces elektromotoru kontrolei
 (1)
 ex 8504 40 90 80 Jaudas konvertors, iekļauj: 0% 31.12.2019
 — līdzstrāvas konvertoru,
 — lādētāju ar jaudu, kas nav lielāka par 7 kW,
 — izslēgšanas funkcijas,
 izmantošanai elektrisko transportlīdzekļu ražošanā
 (1)
 ex 8505 90 20 30 Elektromagnētiskā vārsta spole ar: 0% 31.12.2019
 — virzuli,
 — diametru 12,9 mm (+/- 0,1),
 — augstumu bez virzuļa 20,5 mm (+/- 0,1),
 — elektrisko kabeli ar savienotāju un
 cilindriskā metāla korpusā
 *ex 8507 10 20 30 Svina–skābes akumulatori vai moduļi, izmantojami virzuļdzinēju iedarbināšanai, ar 0% 31.12.2018
 — nominālo jaudu ne lielāku kā 32 Ah,
 — garumu ne vairāk kā 205 mm,
 — platumu ne vairāk kā 130 mm un
 — augstumu ne vairāk kā 190 mm
 izmantošanai tādu preču ražošanā, ko klasificē ar KN kodu 8711
 (1)
 *ex 8507 60 00 85 Taisnstūrveida moduļi, kurus paredzēts iebūvēt atkārtoti uzlādējamos litija jonu 0 % 31.12.2015
 akumulatoros:
 LV 10 LV
 ---pagebreak--- Autonomā Obligātās
 KN kods TARIC Apraksts muitas pārskatīšanas
 nodokļa likme datums
 — garumu 312 mm vai lielāku, bet ne lielāku kā 350 mm
 — platumu 79,8 mm vai lielāku, bet ne lielāku kā 225 mm
 — augstumu 35 mm vai lielāku, bet ne lielāku kā 168 mm
 — masu 3,95 kg vai lielāku, bet ne lielāku kā 8,56 kg,
 — nominālo jaudu 66,6 Ah vai lielāku, bet ne lielāku kā 129 Ah
 *ex 8507 60 00 87 Atkārtoti uzlādējami litija jonu akumulatori ar: 0% 31.12.2017
 — garumu no 1 475 mm līdz 2 820 mm,
 — platumu no 935 mm līdz 1 660 mm,
 — augstumu no 260 mm līdz 600 mm,
 — svaru no 320 kg līdz 700 kg,
 — nominālo jaudu no 18,4 Ah līdz 130 Ah,
 — sapakoti pa 12 vai 16 moduļiem
 *ex 8511 30 00 30 Integrēts aizdedzes spoles bloks ar: 0% 31.12.2019
 — degli,
 — spoli uz kontaktu bloka ar iekļautu montāžas kronšteinu,
 — korpusu,
 — garumu 90 mm vai vairāk, bet ne vairāk kā 200 mm (+/- 5 mm),
 — darbības temperatūru -40 °C vai vairāk, bet ne vairāk kā +130 °C,
 — spriegumu 10,5 V vai lielāku, bet ne lielāku kā 16 V
 ex 8512 20 00 10 Miglas lukturi ar galvanizētu iekšējo virsmu, kuri ietver: 0% 31.12.2019
 — plastmasas turekli ar četriem vai vairāk balsteņiem,
 — vienu vai vairāk, bet ne vairāk kā divas 12 V spuldzes,
 — savienojuma vadu ar savienotāju,
 — plastmasas pārsegu,
 izmantošanai 87. nodaļas preču ražošanā
 (1)
 ex 8512 20 00 20 Informācijas ekrāns, kas rāda vismaz laiku, datumu un transportlīdzekļa drošības 0 % 31.12.2019
 ierīču stāvokli, ar darbības spriegumu 12 V vai lielāku, bet ne lielāku kā 14,4 V,
 paredzēts izmantošanai 87. nodaļas preču ražošanā
 ex 8512 30 90 10 Signāltaures mezgls, kura darbības pamatā ir pjezomehāniskais princips, specifiska 0 % 31.12.2019
 skaņas signāla radīšanai, ar spriegumu 12 V, ietver:
 — spoli,
 — magnētu,
 — metāla membrānu,
 — savienotāju,
 — turekli,
 izmantošanai 87. nodaļas preču ražošanā
 ex 8512 90 90 10 Ultraskaņas sensors transportlīdzekļa novietošanai stāvvietā, ar: 0% 31.12.2019
 — iespiedshēmas plati korpusā un sensora elementu uz pārsega, savienotu ar
 spailēm,
 — darba spriegumu, ne lielāku par 12 V,
 — spēju uztvert un raidīt signālus, ko apstrādā vadības bloks,
 izmantojams 87. nodaļas preču ražošanā
 ex 8514 20 80 10 Iebūvējams krāsns bloks, kas ietver vismaz: 0% 31.12.2019
 ex 8516 50 00 10 — transformatoru ar ieejas spriegumu, ne lielāku par 240 V, un izejas jaudu, ne
 ex 8516 60 80 10 lielāku par 3000 W,
 — maiņstrāvas vai līdzstrāvas ventilatora motoru ar izejas jaudu, ne lielāku par
 42 vatiem,
 — ar nerūsējošā tērauda korpusu,
 — ar magnetronu, kam mikroviļņu izejas jauda nepārsniedz 900, vai bez tā,
 izmantošanai pozīciju 8514 20 80, 8516 50 00 un 8516 60 80 iebūvējamo
 izstrādājumu ražošanā
 (1)
 LV 11 LV
 ---pagebreak--- Autonomā Obligātās
 KN kods TARIC Apraksts muitas pārskatīšanas
 nodokļa likme datums
 ex 8516 90 00 80 Durvju mezgls, ietver kapacitatīvu hermetizācijas elementu un viļņu vārstu, izmanto 0 % 31.12.2019
 pozīcijās 8514 2080, 8516 5000 un 8516 6080 minēto iebūvējamo izstrādājumu
 ražošanā
 (1)
 ex 8518 90 00 80 Iebūvēti automobiļu skaļruņu aizsargi, sastāv no 0% 31.12.2019
 — skaļruņa karkasa un magnētu sistēmas turekļa ar aizsargapvalku un
 — gofrēta pretputekļu auduma
 *ex 8525 80 19 60 Attēla skenēšanas kameras, kas izmanto: 0% 31.12.2019
 — „Dynamic“- vai „Static overlay lines“ sistēmu,
 — NTSC izejas videosignālu,
 — spriegumu 6,5 V vai lielāku,
 — vismaz 0,5 lux apgaismojumu
 *ex 8527 91 99 20 Bloks, kas sastāv vismaz no: 0% 31.12.2019
 ex 8529 90 65 85 — audiofrekvences pastiprinātāja mezgla, kurā ir vismaz audiopastiprinātājs un
 skaņas ģenerators,
 — transformators un
 — radiouztvērējs,
 izmantošanai transportlīdzekļu ražošanā
 (1)
 ex 8529 10 80 70 Keramiskie filtri: 0% 31.12.2019
 — ar izmantojamo frekvenču diapazonu 10 kHz vai lielāku, bet ne lielāku par
 100 MHz,
 — no keramikas plāksnēm izveidotā korpusā ar elektrodiem,
 izmantojami pārveidotājos (elektroenerģija–mehāniskā enerģija) vai rezonatoros
 audiovizuālās un saziņas ierīcēs
 ex 8529 90 65 80 Augstfrekvences signālu pārveidotājs ciparu signālos, izmantošanai tādu 0 % 31.12.2019
 izstrādājumu ražošanā, kas klasificējami pozīcijā 8527
 (1)
 *ex 8529 90 92 15 LCD moduļi, 0% 31.12.2018
 ex 8548 90 90 60 — sastāv tikai no vienas vai vairākām TFT stikla vai plastmasas šūnām,
 — nav apvienoti ar skārienjutīga ekrāna aprīkojumu,
 — ar vienu vai vairākām iespiedshēmas platēm ar elektronisku vadību tikai pikseļu
 adresācijai,
 — ar aizmugurapgaismojuma bloku vai bez tā un
 — ar invertoriem vai bez tiem
 ex 8537 10 99 40 Elektronisks vadības bloks vieglo automobiļu riepu spiediena uzraudzībai, ietver 0 % 31.12.2019
 plastmasas kārbu, kam iekšā ir iespiedshēmas plate, ar metāla turētāju vai bez tā:
 — ar garumu 50 mm vai lielāku, bet ne lielāku par 120 mm,
 — ar platumu 20 mm vai lielāku, bet ne lielāku par 40 mm,
 — ar augstumu 30 mm vai lielāku, bet ne lielāku par 120 mm,
 izmantojams 87. nodaļas preču ražošanā
 ex 8537 10 99 50 Elektronisks vadības bloks BCM (Body Control Module), kas ietver: 0% 31.12.2019
 — plastmasas kārbu ar iespiedshēmas plati un metāla turētāju,
 — ar spriegumu 9 V vai lielāku, bet ne lielāku par 16 V,
 — kas spēj vadīt, novērtēt un pārvaldīt palīgpakalpojumu funkcijas automobilī,
 vismaz stikla tīrītāju ciklu, logu apsildīšanu, iekšējo apgaismojumu,
 atgādinājumu par drošības jostas lietošanu,
 izmantojams 87. nodaļas preču ražošanā
 ex 8537 10 99 60 Elektronisks bloks, sastāv no: 0% 31.12.2019
 — mikroprocesora,
 LV 12 LV
 ---pagebreak--- Autonomā Obligātās
 KN kods TARIC Apraksts muitas pārskatīšanas
 nodokļa likme datums
 — gaismas diodes (LED) vai šķidro kristālu displeja (LCD) indikatoriem,
 — iespiestajā shēmā iemontētiem elektroniskajiem komponentiem,
 izmanto pozīcijās 8514 2080, 8516 5000 un 8516 6080 minēto iebūvējamo
 izstrādājumu ražošanā
 (1)
 ex 8544 49 91 10 Izolēti elektrības vadi no vara: 0% 31.12.2019
 — ar izolētām dzīslām, kuru diametrs pārsniedz 0,51 mm,
 — spriegumam, kas nepārsniedz1 000 V,
 izmantošanai automobiļu daudzdzīslu kabeļu ražošanā
 (1)
 *ex 8548 90 90 65 LCD moduļi, 0% 31.12.2018
 — sastāv tikai no vienas vai vairākām TFT stikla vai plastmasas šūnām,
 — apvienoti ar skārienjutīga ekrāna aprīkojumu,
 — ar vienu vai vairākām iespiedshēmas platēm ar elektronisku vadību tikai pikseļu
 adresācijai,
 — ar aizmugurapgaismojuma bloku vai bez tā un
 — ar invertoriem vai bez tiem
 ex 8708 30 10 10 Bremžu ierīces bloks, ko veido 0% 31.12.2019
 — bremžu elektriskās vadības ierīce,
 — gājiena sensors,
 — TDV (transportlīdzekļa dinamiskā vadība) un
 — rezerves enerģijas avots,
 izmantošanai transportlīdzekļu ražošanā
 (1)
 ex 8708 30 91 20 Organiska azbestu nesaturoša materiāla bremžu kluči ar bremžu uzliku, uzmontētu 0 % 31.12.2019
 uz atbalsta plāksnes no tērauda lentes, izmantošanai 87. nodaļas preču ražošanā
 (1)
 ex 8708 30 91 30 Disku bremžu korpuss mehānismā BIR (Ball in Ramp) vai EPB (elektriskās 0 % 31.12.2019
 stāvbremzes) versijā, satur funkcionālās un montēšanas atveres un vadrievas,
 izmantojams 87. nodaļas preču ražošanā
 ex 8708 91 35 10 No alumīnija izgatavots dzesinātājs, kas izmanto saspiestu gaisu, ar rievotu dizainu, 0 % 31.12.2019
 izmantošanai 87. nodaļas preču ražošanā
 ex 8708 94 35 20 Zobstieņa stūres mehānisms alumīnija korpusā ar homokinētiskiem 0 % 31.12.2019
 locīklsavienojumiem, izmantošanai 87. nodaļas preču ražošanā
 ex 9002 11 00 80 Lēcu bloks ar: 0% 31.12.2019
 — redzamības lauku 58,5 grādi - 194 grādi,
 — fokusa attālumu no 1,16 mm līdz 3,88 mm,
 — relatīvo atvērumu F/2.0 -2.6,
 — diametru 17 mm - 18,5 mm,
 izmantošanai automobiļu CMOS kameru ražošanā
 (1)
 ex 9029 10 00 30 Ātruma sensors, kurā izmantots Hola efekts riteņu apgriezienu mērīšanai 0 % 31.12.2019
 mehāniskajos transportlīdzekļos, aprīkots ar plastikāta korpusu un piestiprināts
 savienotājkabelim ar savienotājiem un turekļu balstiem, izmantošanai 87. nodaļas
 preču ražošanā
 ex 9029 20 31 10 Kombinēts instrumentu panelis ar mikroprocesora vadības pulti, pakāpju motoru un 0 % 31.12.2019
 ex 9029 90 00 20 LED indikatoriem, kuri rāda pamata elementus, kas attiecas uz transportlīdzekļa
 stāvokli, vismaz:
 — ātrumu,
 — motora apgriezienus,
 — motora temperatūru,
 — degvielas līmeni,
 LV 13 LV
 ---pagebreak--- Autonomā Obligātās
 KN kods TARIC Apraksts muitas pārskatīšanas
 nodokļa likme datums
 veic komunikāciju CAN-BUS un K-LINE protokolos, izmantošanai 87. nodaļas
 preču ražošanā
 ex 9031 80 34 50 Programmējams lineārs Hola efekta sensors ar divām izejām, 0% 31.12.2019
 — sastāv no divām integrētām iespiedshēmām, kas nav savstarpēji elektriski
 saistītas, augšējās matrices un apakšējās matrices,
 — kas novietotas pievada struktūras augšā un apakšā,
 — pusvadītāja korpusā,
 paredzēts izmantot leņķu, pozīcijas un strāvas mērīšanai automobiļos
 ex 9031 80 38 50 Žiroskopisks sensors transportlīdzekļa vertikālās ass tangenciālā paātrinājuma 0 % 31.12.2019
 mērīšanai, ietver:
 — pjezoelektrisku kristālu elektriskā potenciāla radīšanai deformēšanās laikā un
 — plastmasas kārbu ar metāla turētāju,
 izmantojams 87. nodaļas preču ražošanā
 ex 9031 80 38 60 Drošības spilvena sensors, iespiedshēmas plate un savienotājs plastmasas korpusā, 0 % 31.12.2019
 pārslodzes “G” uzraudzīšanai un vērtību nodrošināšanai ar mērķi novērtēt, vai
 iedarbināmi drošības spilveni, izmantojams 87. nodaļas preču ražošanā
 ex 9031 80 98 30 Funkcionāla testēšanas ierīce automobiļu kameru lēcu kalibrēšanai un attēla 0 % 31.12.2019
 kvalitātes testēšanai
 (1) Uz nodokļu piemērošanas apturēšanu attiecas 291.–300. pants Komisijas 1993. gada 2. jūlija Regulā (EEK) Nr. 2454/93, ar ko nosaka
 īstenošanas noteikumus Padomes Regulai (EEK) Nr. 2913/92 par Kopienas Muitas kodeksa izveidi (OV L 253, 11.10.1993., 1. lpp.).
 (2) Pasākums tomēr nav atļauts, ja apstrādi veic mazumtirdzniecības vai pārtikas apgādes uzņēmumi.
 ;
 LV 14 LV
 ---pagebreak--- (c) no tabulas svītro šādus ierakstus par ražojumiem ar šādiem KN un TARIC kodiem:
 KN kods TARIC
 ex 2009 89 73 11
 ex 2009 89 73 13
 ex 2009 89 99 93
 ex 2207 20 00 20
 ex 2207 20 00 80
 ex 2818 10 91 10
 ex 2915 90 70 40
 ex 2921 45 00 10
 ex 2927 00 00 15
 ex 2932 99 00 35
 ex 2934 99 90 33
 ex 3204 20 00 40
 ex 3811 21 00 43
 ex 3811 21 00 53
 ex 3820 00 00 20
 ex 3824 90 92 52
 ex 3901 10 10 10
 ex 3901 10 10 20
 ex 3901 90 90 30
 ex 3901 90 90 40
 ex 3901 90 90 50
 ex 3903 19 00 30
 ex 3912 20 11 10
 ex 3919 10 80 21
 ex 3919 10 80 65
 ex 3919 90 00 21
 ex 3919 90 00 37
 LV 15 LV
 ---pagebreak--- KN kods TARIC
 ex 3919 90 00 57
 ex 3920 61 00 20
 ex 3920 62 19 81
 ex 7606 12 92 20
 ex 7607 11 90 10
 ex 7607 11 90 20
 ex 8108 90 30 30
 ex 8411 99 00 30
 ex 8411 99 00 40
 ex 8483 30 38 30
 ex 8504 50 95 60
 ex 8507 10 20 85
 ex 8507 60 00 35
 ex 8507 60 00 70
 ex 8511 30 00 20
 ex 8525 80 19 35
 ex 8527 21 59 10
 ex 8527 29 00 20
 ex 8527 29 00 30
 ex 8527 91 99 10
 ex 8529 90 65 35
 ex 8529 90 92 44
 ex 8543 70 90 13
 ex 8543 70 90 23
 ex 8548 90 90 47
 ex 8548 90 90 49
 ex 8548 90 90 55
 ex 9405 40 39 50
 ex 9405 40 39 60
 LV 16 LV
 ---pagebreak--- KN kods TARIC
 ex 9405 40 99 03
 ex 9405 40 99 06
 ;
 LV 17 LV
 ---pagebreak--- 2) II pielikumu groza šādi:
 (a) tabulai pievieno šādus ierakstus par papildvienībām ar šādiem KN un TARIC
 kodiem:
 KN TARIC PAPILDVIENĪBA
 9031 8034 50 1000 p/st
 8544 4991 10 m
 3901 1010 30 m3
 3901 9090 60 m3
 3920 9928 65 m2
 3920 9928 75 m2
 3921 9060 30 m2
 3903 9090 45 m3
 3920 7910 10 p/st
 6804 2100 10 p/st
 7616 9910 30 p/st
 8409 9900 30 p/st
 8411 9900 60 p/st
 8411 9900 70 p/st
 8479 8997 70 p/st
 8479 8997 80 p/st
 8483 3038 40 p/st
 8504 4088 30 p/st
 8504 4090 80 p/st
 8505 9020 30 p/st
 8511 3000 30 p/st
 8512 2000 10 p/st
 8512 2000 20 p/st
 8512 3090 10 p/st
 8512 9090 10 p/st
 8514 2080 10 p/st
 8516 9000 80 p/st
 8518 9000 80 p/st
 8529 1080 70 p/st
 8529 9065 80 p/st
 8529 9092 15 p/st
 8537 1099 40 p/st
 8537 1099 50 p/st
 8537 1099 60 p/st
 8548 9090 60 p/st
 8548 9090 65 p/st
 LV 18 LV
 ---pagebreak--- KN TARIC PAPILDVIENĪBA
 8708 3010 10 p/st
 8708 3091 20 p/st
 8708 3091 30 p/st
 8708 9135 10 p/st
 8708 9435 20 p/st
 9029 1000 30 p/st
 9029 2031 10 p/st
 9029 9000 20 p/st
 9031 8038 50 p/st
 9031 8038 60 p/st
 9031 8098 30 p/st
 ;
 LV 19 LV
 ---pagebreak--- (b) no tabulas svītro šādus ierakstus par papildvienībām ar šādiem KN un TARIC
 kodiem:
 CN TARIC PAPILDVIENĪBA
 3901 1010 10 m3
 3901 9090 30 m3
 8411 9900 30 p/st
 8411 9900 40 p/st
 8483 3038 30 p/st
 8504 5095 60 p/st
 8511 3000 20 p/st
 8527 2900 30 p/st
 8529 9092 44 p/st
 8543 7090 13 p/st
 8543 7090 23 p/st
 8548 9090 47 p/st
 8548 9090 49 p/st
 8548 9090 55 p/st
 9405 4039 50 p/st
 9405 4099 03 p/st
 9405 4099 06 p/st
 .
 LV 20 LV


text:
Fiscaal Journaal | Een index van fiscaal nieuws
 HomeBinnenlandBuitenlandBesluiten, kamervragen & notaActuele belastingrechtspraakVideo’sOver Ons
 Geplaatst op 27 oktober 2016 door Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Panama signed today the Multilateral Convention on Mutual Administrative Assistance in Tax Matters, making it the 105th jurisdiction to join the world’s leading instrument for boosting transparency and combating cross-border tax evasion. The signing shows that Panama is now implementing its commitment to fully cooperate with the international community on transparency. Geplaatst in Internationaal, Nieuws, OECD |
 Margaret Hodge: ‘The Tories may create tax haven conditions in the UK’
 Geplaatst op 27 oktober 2016 door Guardian.co.uk The former chair of the public accounts committee, Margaret Hodge, tells Owen Jones she fears the Conservative government may think the only way for the British economy to survive following the Brexit vote is to create tax haven-type conditions. She warns this would lead to a race to the bottom with ‘promiscuous capital’ arriving before deserting the country when a better rate comes along An extended version of this interview is available on Owen Jones’s YouTube channel Margaret Hodge’s new book, Called to Account, is available now Continue reading... Geplaatst in Internationaal, Nieuws, The Guardian |
 ECLI:NL:GHSHE:2016:2189 Gerechtshof ‘s-Hertogenbosch, 03-06-2016, 15/00506 en 15/00507
 Geplaatst op 27 oktober 2016 door Rechtspraak Aanslagen IB/PVV 2011 en Zvw 2011
 I. Heeft de Inspecteur terecht de aftrek van advocaatkosten van € 12.605 geweigerd?
 II. Zo ja, moet die aftrek dan toch worden toegestaan wegens schending van een of meer algemene
 beginselen van behoorlijk bestuur? Het Hof overweegt vooraf en ambtshalve de door belanghebbende genoemde getuigen niet op te roepen, de zaken niet aan te houden en het aanbod va... Geplaatst in Belastingrechtspraak |
 ECLI:NL:GHSHE:2016:2191 Gerechtshof ‘s-Hertogenbosch, 31-05-2016, 15/00490
 Geplaatst op 27 oktober 2016 door Rechtspraak Belanghebbende woont in België. Hij is bestuurder en enig aandeelhouder van een BVBA. De BVBA is actief in projectmanagement en belanghebbende voerde als enige werknemer van de BVBA werkzaamheden uit ten behoeve van projecten in een projectkantoor in Nederland. Hij beschikte daar niet over een vaste werkplek; hem werden naar behoefte wisselende bureaus ter beschikking gesteld. Op de werklocatie... Geplaatst in Belastingrechtspraak |
 ECLI:NL:GHDHA:2016:2866 Gerechtshof Den Haag, 02-09-2016, BK-15/00001
 Geplaatst op 27 oktober 2016 door Rechtspraak In geschil is of de schenkingen door erflaatster in 2008, 2009 en 2010 aan belanghebbende die door haar zijn schuldig gebleven, in mindering komen op de belaste verkrijging ten gevolge van het overlijden van erflaatster in 2011. Geplaatst in Belastingrechtspraak |
 ECLI:NL:GHSHE:2016:2188 Gerechtshof ‘s-Hertogenbosch, 03-06-2016, 15/00110
 Geplaatst op 27 oktober 2016 door Rechtspraak Hof Den Bosch oordeelt de door belanghebbende in aftrek gebrachte arbeidskosten (reiskosten) en terugbetaalde studiekostenvergoeding niet aftrekbaar en verwerpt een beroep op het vertrouwensbeginsel
 Geen symmetrische behandeling van arbeidskosten die een werknemer zelf draagt en arbeidskosten die door de werkgever worden vergoed onder de Wet inkomstenbelasting 2001. Het verschil tussen de maxim... Geplaatst in Belastingrechtspraak |
 ECLI:NL:GHDHA:2016:2867 Gerechtshof Den Haag, 28-09-2016, BK-16/00096 en BK-16/00097
 Geplaatst op 27 oktober 2016 door Rechtspraak In geschil is of de beroepen ontvankelijk zijn. Zo dat het geval is, is tussen partijen niet in geschil dat de beroepen ter behandeling en beslissing dienen te worden teruggewezen naar de rechtbank. Geplaatst in Belastingrechtspraak |
 ECLI:NL:GHDHA:2016:2868 Gerechtshof Den Haag, 21-09-2016, BK-15/01208, BK-15/01207 en BK-15/01208
 Geplaatst op 27 oktober 2016 door Rechtspraak In geschil is of de Inspecteur bij uitspraak op bezwaar de naheffingsaanslagen te hoog heeft vastgesteld en of aan belanghebbende terecht boetes zijn opgelegd. Geplaatst in Belastingrechtspraak |
 ECLI:NL:GHDHA:2016:2869 Gerechtshof Den Haag, 21-09-2016, BK-15/01209
 Geplaatst op 27 oktober 2016 door Rechtspraak In geschil is of belanghebbende de vereiste aangifte heeft gedaan en of de Inspecteur bij uitspraak op bezwaar de naheffingsaanslag te hoog heeft vastgesteld en aan belanghebbende terecht een boete heeft opgelegd. Geplaatst in Belastingrechtspraak |
 ECLI:NL:RBDHA:2016:9911 Rechtbank Den Haag, 19-08-2016, AWB – 16 _ 1177
 Geplaatst op 27 oktober 2016 door Rechtspraak Inkomstenbelasting, aftrek uitgaven voor onderhoudsverplichtingen, buitenlandse belastingplicht
 In zijn aangifte inkomstenbelasting over 2011 heeft eiser, uitgaande van binnenlandse belastingplicht, uitgaven voor onderhoudsverplichtingen (aftrek alimentatie) in aftrek gebracht.
 Bij de vaststelling van de aanslag heeft verweerder deze aftrek niet geaccepteerd. In de uitspraak op bezwaar heeft ve... Geplaatst in Belastingrechtspraak |
 OECD Work on Taxation – Brochure
 Geplaatst op 26 oktober 2016 door Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development This brochure highlights some of the cutting-edge analysis we are doing on issues such as developing international tax standards, supporting governments through the implementation process, undertaking peer reviews to ensure commitments are met, as well as collecting and analysing high-quality revenue data to support the design of tax policy to meet a range of government objectives. Geplaatst in Internationaal, Nieuws, OECD |
 Geplaatst op 26 oktober 2016 door Internationaltaxreview.com IKEA has lost an important tax battle that could have implications for other multinationals deducting interest on inter-company debt. Geplaatst in Internationaal, Internationaltaxreview, Nieuws |
 Geplaatst op 26 oktober 2016 door Internationaltaxreview.com Norway has ruled in the IKEA Handel og Eiendom case involving interest deductions on inter-company debt in a tax decision that could have implications for multinationals using the arm's-length principle. Geplaatst in Internationaal, Internationaltaxreview, Nieuws |
 Geplaatst op 26 oktober 2016 door Fiscaal beleid - Europa Nu DEN HAAG (ANP) - Ondernemend Nederland ziet niets in plannen voor uniforme Europese belastingregels voor grote bedrijven. Ons land moet zelf blijven bepalen hoe bedrijfswinsten worden belast, aldus VNO-NCW woensdag in een reactie op een voorstel van die strekking uit Brussel. Geplaatst in Europa Nu, Internationaal, Nationaal, Nieuws |
 ECLI:NL:RBOBR:2016:5611 Rechtbank Oost-Brabant, 12-10-2016, 15_3092
 Geplaatst op 26 oktober 2016 door Rechtspraak WOZ. Twee winkelpanden in Eindhoven. Verweerder verlaagt de waarden in beroep. Eiseres, een BV, kan zich vinden in de waarde van één van de twee winkels Verweerder maakt ten aanzien van het andere winkelpand niet aannemelijk dat de huurwaarde niet te hoog is. Verweerder gebruikt de zogenaamde ITZA-methode en kan ter zitting geen verklaring kunnen geven voor de afwijkende en de huurwaarde van d... Geplaatst in Belastingrechtspraak |
 Filters Belastingrechtspraak (14.857)
 Besluiten (759)
 Erasmus Tax Law Department (191)
 Internationaal (6.197)
 Nationaal (3.575)
 Nieuws (8.595)
 Europa Nu (993)
 Internationaltaxreview (2.638)
 Rijksoverheid (1.195)
 The Guardian (682)
 Twitter www.twitter.com/FiscaalJournaal


text:
 1.7.2006
 ES
 Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea
 C 154/7
 Petición de decisión prejudicial planteada por la Commissione tributaria provinciale di Roma el 27 de marzo de 2006 — Leasys SpA/Agenzia Entrate Ufficio Roma 7
 (Asunto C-165/06)
 (2006/C 154/14)
 Lengua de procedimiento: italiano
 Órgano jurisdiccional remitente
 Commissione tributaria provinciale di Roma
 Partes en el procedimiento principal
 Demandante: Leasys SpA
 Demandada: Agenzia Entrate Ufficio Roma 7
 Cuestión prejudicial
 «¿Debe interpretarse el artículo 33 de la Directiva 77/388/CEE (1), en su versión modificada por la Directiva 91/680/CEE (2), en el sentido de que prohíbe someter al IRAP (impuesto regional sobre las actividades productivas) el valor de la producción neta resultante del ejercicio habitual de una actividad organizada de forma autónoma dirigida a la producción o intercambio de bienes o a la prestación de servicios?»
 (1) DO L 145, p. 1; EE 09/01, p. 54.
 (2) DO L 376, p. 1.


text:
 8.11.2011
 NL
 Publicatieblad van de Europese Unie
 L 289/12
 UITVOERINGSVERORDENING (EU) Nr. 1120/2011 VAN DE COMMISSIE
 van 31 oktober 2011
 houdende inschrijving van een benaming in het register van beschermde oorsprongsbenamingen en beschermde geografische aanduidingen (Carciofo Brindisino (BGA))
 DE EUROPESE COMMISSIE,
 Gezien het Verdrag betreffende de werking van de Europese Unie,
 Gezien Verordening (EG) nr. 510/2006 van de Raad van 20 maart 2006 inzake de bescherming van geografische aanduidingen en oorsprongsbenamingen van landbouwproducten en levensmiddelen (1), en met name artikel 7, lid 4, eerste alinea,
 Overwegende hetgeen volgt:
 (1)
 Overeenkomstig artikel 6, lid 2, eerste alinea, van Verordening (EG) nr. 510/2006 is de door Italië ingediende aanvraag tot registratie van de benaming „Carciofo Brindisino” bekendgemaakt in het Publicatieblad van de Europese Unie
 (2).
 (2)
 Aangezien bij de Commissie geen bezwaren zijn ingediend overeenkomstig artikel 7 van Verordening (EG) nr. 510/2006, moet deze benaming worden ingeschreven in het register van beschermde oorsprongsbenamingen en beschermde geografische aanduidingen,
 HEEFT DE VOLGENDE VERORDENING VASTGESTELD:
 Artikel 1
 De in de bijlage vermelde benaming wordt ingeschreven in het register van beschermde oorsprongsbenamingen en beschermde geografische aanduidingen.
 Artikel 2
 Deze verordening treedt in werking op de twintigste dag na die van de bekendmaking ervan in het Publicatieblad van de Europese Unie.
 Deze verordening is verbindend in al haar onderdelen en is rechtstreeks toepasselijk in elke lidstaat.
 Gedaan te Brussel, 31 oktober 2011.
 Voor de Commissie, namens de voorzitter,
 Dacian CIOLOȘ
 Lid van de Commissie
 (1) PB L 93 van 31.3.2006, blz. 12.
 (2) PB C 29 van 29.1.2011, blz. 27.
 BIJLAGE
 In bijlage I bij het Verdrag genoemde landbouwproducten voor menselijke consumptie:
 Categorie 1.6. Groenten, fruit en granen, in ongewijzigde staat of verwerkt
 ITALIË
 Carciofo Brindisino (BGA)