type: legislation

jurisdiction: EU

text:
22. 11. 88 Diario Oficial de las Comunidades Europeas N° C 297/13
 II
 (Actos jurídicos preparatorios)
 COMISIÓN
 Propuesta de Reglamento (CEE) del Consejo relativo al saneamiento estructural de la nave-
 gación interior
 COM(88) 111 final
 (Presentada por la Comisión el 19 de mayo de 1988)
 (88/C 297/12)
 EL CONSEJO DE LAS COMUNIDADES EUROPEAS, Considerando que, debido a la actual amplitud de las so-
 brecapacidades estructurales, a la insuficiencia previsible
 Visto el Tratado constitutivo de la Comunidad Econó- de los medios financieros para reducirlas rápidamente y
 mica Europea y, en particular, el artículo 75, al riesgo de posteriores disminuciones de la demanda a
 consecuencia de sucesivas mutaciones industriales, parece
 Vista la propuesta de la Comisión, aconsejable que se creen, por una duración indetermi-
 nada, los instrumentos jurídicos, administrativos y finan-
 Visto el dictamen del Parlamento Europeo, cieros necesarios para paliar estas sobrecapacidades;
 Visto el dictamen del Comité Económico y Social,
 Considerando que se registran sobrecapacidades en ge-
 Considerando que las sobrecapacidades estructurales de neral en todos los sectores del mercado de transportes
 carga que registran desde hace cierto tiempo las flotas por vía navegable; que las medidas que deberán adop-
 que operan en la red de vías navegables entrelazadas de tarse deberán ser, pues, de carácter general y englobar a
 Bélgica, Alemania, Francia y los Países Bajos afectan todos los buques tanto de transporte de mercancías como
 sensiblemente a la situación económica de los transportes empujadores; que se podría considerar, sin embargo, que
 y sobre todo al sector de los transportes de mercancías se eximían de tales medidas aquellos buques que, por sus
 por vía navegable de los mencionados países; dimensiones o afectación exclusiva a unos mercados na-
 cionales cerrados, no contribuyen a las sobrecapacidades
 Considerando que las previsiones no permiten contem- en la mencionada red de vías navegables entrelazadas;
 plar para los próximos años un crecimiento de la de- que, en cambio, debido a su influencia en el mercado de
 manda en este sector suficiente para absorber estas so- transportes, conviene incluir en el sistema las flotas pri-
 brecapacidades; que, en efecto, la parte correspondiente vadas que efectúen transportes por cuenta propia;
 a la navegación interior en el mercado global de trans-
 portes sigue disminuyendo debido a las mutaciones pro-
 gresivas sufridas por las industrias de base cuyo abasteci-
 miento se realiza esencialmente por vía navegable; Considerando que, debido a diferencias fundamentales
 entre los mercados de transportes de carga seca y los de
 Considerando que las acciones de desguace de buques, transportes de materias líquidas es conveniente llevar en
 organizadas a escala nacional por algunos Estados un mismo fondo cuentas separadas para los buques de
 miembros, aunque han arrojado un resultado positivo carga seca y los buques-cisterna;
 son insuficientes debido principalmente a una falta de
 coordinación de estas acciones a escala internacional;
 Considerando que, en el contexto de una política econó-
 Considerando que un enfoque común que permita a los mica compatible con el Tratado, el saneamiento estruc-
 Estados miembros adoptar conjuntamente medidas enca- tural de un determinado sector económico incumbe en
 minadas a la consecución de un mismo objetivo consti- primer lugar a los operadores de este sector; que los cos-
 tuye uno de los requisitos indispensables para garantizar tes del sistema que se establezca deben, pues, ser sufra-
 la reducción efectiva del excedente de capacidad de gados por las empresas que operan en el sector de la na-
 carga; que conviene se constituyan a tal fin unos fondos vegación interior; que para la puesta en marcha del sis-
 de desguace en aquellos Estados miembros especialmente tema y para que éste sea operativo desde un principio,
 interesados en la navegación interior; que las empresas conviene prever una prefinanciación por parte de los Es-
 establecidas en otros Estados miembros que efectúen tados miembros interesados en forma de préstamos
 transportes por las vías navegables entrelazadas de los reembolsables; que, debido a la difícil situación econó-
 Estados miembros interesados deben contribuir a alguno mica de las empresas, convendría que tales préstamos se
 de los fondos de desguace constituidos; concediesen sin intereses;
 ---pagebreak--- N ° C 297/14 Diario Oficial de las Comunidades Europeas 22. 11. 88
 Considerando que, de conformidad con el artículo 74 HA ADOPTADO EL PRESENTE REGLAMENTO:
 del Tratado, sus objetivos, en materia de transportes, se
 perseguirán en el marco de una política común; que, se-
 gún se desprende del artículo 77, esta política puede im- Artículo 1
 plicar el recurso a ayudas, especialmente cuando respon-
 1. Los buques de navegación interior afectados al
 dan a necesidades de coordinación de transportes; que la
 transporte de mercancías por vías navegables de los Esta-
 acción de la Comunidad en este campo, incluidas las
 dos miembros serán sometidos a un sistema de sanea-
 ayudas, debe tener en cuenta los diferentes objetivos ge-
 miento estructural de la navegación interior en las condi-
 nerales del artículo 3 y en especial el de su letra f), en
 ciones que se establecen a continuación.
 materia de competencia; que al igual que en el caso de
 las ayudas sujetas a las normas del artículo 92 y siguien-
 tes del Tratado, conviene garantizar que las medidas 2. El sistema incluirá:
 previstas en el presente Reglamento y su aplicación no
 falseen o amenacen falsear la competencia, favoreciendo
 — medidas encaminadas a reducir las sobrecapacidades
 a determinadas empresas en forma contraria al interés
 estructurales mediante acciones de desguace,
 común; que para que las empresas interesadas estén en
 igualdad de condiciones, en materia de competencia, las
 cotizaciones que deben abonarse a los fondos de des- — medidas complementarias tendentes a evitar la agra-
 guace y las primas de desguace deben tener tipos unifor- vación de las sobrecapacidades existentes o la apari-
 mes; que es igualmente importante que las acciones de ción de sobrecapacidades adicionales.
 desguace se inicien al mismo tiempo, tengan la misma
 duración y estén sujetas a las mismas condiciones en to-
 dos los Estados miembros interesados; Artículo 2
 1. El presente Reglamento se aplicará a los buques de
 transporte de mercancías y empujadores que efectúen
 Considerando que conviene impedir que los efectos deri- transportes tanto por cuenta ajena como por cuenta pro-
 vados de las acciones de desguace coordinadas queden pia, que estén matriculados en un Estado miembro o
 anulados por la entrada en servicio simultánea de nuevas que, sin estar matriculados, sean explotados por una em-
 capacidades de carga; que, en caso de sobrecapacidades presa establecida en un Estado miembro.
 graves y persistentes, puede resultar necesario prever
 temporalmente medidas destinadas a frenar estas inver-
 A los efectos del presente Reglamento, se entenderá por
 siones, sin que estas medidas puedan conducir, sin em-
 empresa cualquier persona física o jurídica que ejerza
 bargo, a un bloqueo total del acceso al mercado de
 transportes por vía navegable o a una contingentación de una actividad económica artesanal o industrial.
 las flotas nacionales;
 2. Quedarán eximidos de la aplicación del presente
 Reglamento:
 Considerando que, en el marco del sistema propuesto,
 conviene prever medidas sociales en favor de las personas a) los buques que naveguen exclusivamente por vías na-
 que deseen abandonar el sector de los transportes por vía cionales no enlazadas con otras vías navegables de la
 navegable o pasar a otro sector de actividades; Comunidad;
 b) — los empujadores cuya fuerza motriz de propulsión
 Considerando que las decisiones que han de adoptarse no exceda de 300 kilovatios,
 para el funcionamiento del sistema, dado el carácter co- — los buques fluviomarítimos y las gabarras, siempre
 munitario de este último, deben adoptarse a escala co- que efectúen exclusivamente transportes que im-
 munitaria previa consulta a los Estados miembros y a las pliquen un recorrido marítimo,
 organizaciones profesionales de transportes por vía nave-
 gable; que debe atribuirse a la Comisión competencia — los transbordadores,
 para adoptar estas decisiones, así como para velar por su — los buques afectados a un servicio público no co-
 aplicación y por el mantenimiento de las condiciones de mercial.
 competencia previstas en el presente Reglamento;
 Artículo 3
 Considerando que, a fin de prevenir distorsiones de 1. Cada uno de los Estados miembros cuyas vías nave-
 competencia en los mercados y con objeto de incremen- gables estén enlazadas con las de otro Estado miembro y
 tar la eficacia del sistema propuesto, es conveniente que cuya flota tenga un tonelaje superior a 100 000 tonela-
 Suiza adopte medidas análogas para la flota que navega das, denominados en lo sucesivo «Estados miembros in-
 por la red de vías navegables entrelazadas de los Estados teresados», creará, en el marco de su legislación nacional
 miembros interesados; que conviene, con arreglo al Tra- y con sus propios instrumentos administrativos, un fondo
 tado, que la Comisión, en nombre de la Comunidad, en- de desguace que, en lo sucesivo, se denominará «el
 table negociaciones con aquel país sobre esta cuestión, fondo».
 ---pagebreak--- 22. 11. 88 Diario Oficial de las Comunidades Europeas N° C 297/15
 2. La gestión de cada fondo incumbirá a las autorida- — los coeficientes de valorización para los distintos ti-
 des competentes del Estado miembro interesado. Este, a pos y categorías de embarcación fluvial.
 su vez, asociará a esta gestión a las organizaciones repre-
 sentativas nacionales de la navegación interior.
 2. Los tipos de las cotizaciones y de las primas por
 3. Cada fondo deberá constar de dos cuentas distin- desguace se expresan en ecus y serán los mismos para
 tas, una para los buques de carga seca y otra para los todos los fondos.
 buques cisterna.
 3. Los tipos de las cotizaciones se fijarán a un nivel
 Artículo 4 que permita a los fondos disponer de los medios finan-
 cieros suficientes para contribuir eficazmente a la reduc-
 1. Por cada buque a que se refiere el artículo 2, no
 ción de los desequilibrios estructurales entre la oferta y
 excluido del ámbito de aplicación del presente Regla-
 la demanda en la navegación interior. Por otra parte, de-
 mento, el propietario abonará a uno de los fondos crea-
 berán situarse a un nivel aceptable para las empresas de
 dos en virtud del artículo 3 una cotización fijada con
 navegación interior, habida cuenta de su difícil situación
 arreglo a las disposiciones del artículo 6.
 económica.
 2. En el caso de los buques matriculados en uno de
 los Estados miembros interesados y de los buques que, Las cotizaciones se calcularán en función del tonelaje de
 sin estar matriculados, son explotados por una empresa peso muerto y de la potencia de propulsión del buque.
 establecida en uno de estos Estados, la cotización se Serán anuales y deberán abonarse a principio de año,
 abonará al fondo del Estado miembro donde esté matri- contra entrega de un documento probatorio del pago.
 culado el buque o al fondo del Estado miembro donde Este documento deberá estar, a partir del día 1 de marzo
 esté establecida la empresa, respectivamente. del año considerado, a bordo del buque o del empujador
 cuando se trate de una embarcación fluvial sin tripula-
 3. En el caso de los buques matriculados en otro Es- ción.
 tado miembro y de los buques que, sin estar matricula-
 dos, son explotados por una empresa establecida en uno En caso de inmovilización del buque, debidamente pro-
 de esos otros Estados miembros, la cotización se abo- bada, durante más de tres meses consecutivos, la cotiza-
 nará, a elección del propietario del buque, a uno de los ción podrá reembolsarse en proporción a la duración de
 fondos creados en los Estados miembros interesados. dicha inmovilización.
 Esta elección se realizará de una vez por todas y será
 válida para todos los buques que pertenezcan a un 4. La Comisión determinará los períodos de desguace
 mismo propietario o explotados por una misma empresa. durante los cuales podrán obtenerse primas, así como sus
 condiciones de concesión, en función de los objetivos
 Artículo 5 que deben alcanzarse, de acuerdo con los distintos tipos
 y categorías de buques y teniendo en cuenta las posibili-
 1. El propietario de un buque por el que se hayan
 dades económicas de los fondos.
 abonado cotizaciones recibirá del fondo a que perte-
 nezca dicho buque, si procede a desguazarlo, dentro de
 los límites de los medios financieros disponibles, una 5. La Comisión determinará las modalidades de la so-
 prima por desguace en las condiciones previstas en el ar- lidaridad financiera contemplada en el apartado 2 del ar-
 tículo 6. La prima por desguace sólo se concederá por un tículo 5.
 buque cuyo propietario demuestre que el buque forma
 parte de la flota activa.
 6. La Comisión adoptará las decisiones a que se refie-
 2. Entre los fondos se establecerá una solidaridad fi- ren los apartados 1 a 5, previa consulta a los Estados
 nanciera. Esta intervendrá cuando un fondo no pueda miembros y a las organizaciones representativas de la na-
 atender, por falta de medios financieros, las solicitudes vegación interior a escala comunitaria.
 de prima por desguace que le hayan sido presentadas y
 cuando otros fondos dispongan de un exceso de recur- La Comisión tendrá en cuenta asimismo, en sus decisio-
 sos, debido a una escasez de solicitudes de desguace. nes, los resultados de la observación de los mercados de
 transportes en la Comunidad y de su evolución previsi-
 Artículo 6 ble, así como la necesidad de evitar que la competencia
 sea falseada en forma contraria al interés común.
 1. La Comisión fijará separadamente para los buques
 de carga seca y para los buques cisterna, así como para
 los empujadores: Artículo 7
 — el tipo de las cotizaciones anuales que deberán abo- Sin perjuicio de las disposiciones del Tratado y de las
 narse al fondo por cada buque, disposiciones adoptadas para su aplicación en materia de
 ayudas, los Estados miembros interesados podrán prefi-
 — el tipo de las primas por desguace,
 nanciar, en forma de préstamos, el fondo creado en su
 — los períodos de las acciones de desguace durante los territorio. Las cantidades así concedidas deberán ser
 cuales se abonarán las primas por desguace y las con- reembolsadas por el fondo sin intereses con arreglo a un
 diciones en que podrán obtenerse estas primas, programa previamente establecido.
 ---pagebreak--- N ° C 297/16 Diario Oficial de las Comunidades Europeas 22. 11. 88
 Artículo 8 Artículo 9
 1. Durante el período de las acciones de desguace de- Los Estados miembros adoptarán medidas tendentes a:
 cididas por la Comisión con arreglo al artículo 6, la — facilitar a los transportistas por vía navegable que se
 puesta en servicio en las vías navegables contempladas en retiren de la profesión la obtención de una pensión
 el artículo 3 de buques sometidos al presente Reglamento de jubilación anticipada o su reconversión a otra acti-
 en virtud del artículo 2, de nueva construcción, importa- vidad económica;
 dos de un tercer país o eximidos de la aplicación del pre-
 sente Reglamento en virtud de la letra a) del apartado 2 — conceder a los trabajadores que abandonen la nave-
 del artículo 2 quedará sometida a la siguiente condición: gación interior, a consecuencia de las acciones de
 desguace, una pensión de jubilación anticipada y or-
 ganizar cursos de formación profesional o de recon-
 — que el propietario del buque que debe entrar en servi- versión.
 cio desguace, sin prima por desguace, un tonelaje de
 capacidad de carga equivalente al de este buque, Artículo 10
 La Comisión negociará con Suiza, en nombre de la Co-
 — o que, en caso de no desguazar ningún buque, abone munidad, las disposiciones que deberá adoptar este país
 al fondo al que pertenezca su nuevo buque o que para aplicar medidas comparables a las medidas comuni-
 haya elegido con arreglo a las disposiciones del artí- tarias establecidas en virtud del presente Reglamento.
 culo 4, una cotización especial por un importe igual a
 la prima por desguace fijada para el período de des- Artículo 11
 guace en curso por un tonelaje igual al del nuevo bu-
 1. Los Estados miembros adoptarán, a más tardar, el
 que,
 31 de octubre de 1988, previa consulta a la Comisión, las
 medidas necesarias para la ejecución del presente Re-
 — o que, en caso de desguazar un tonelaje inferior al glamento.
 del nuevo buque que deba entrar en servicio, abone
 Estas medidas deberán prever, en especial, un control
 al fondo correspondiente una cotización especial por
 permanente y eficaz del cumplimiento de las obligaciones
 un importe equivalente al de la prima por desguace
 que incumben a las empresas en virtud del presenté Re-
 que corresponda en el momento a la diferencia entre
 glamento, de las disposiciones nacionales adoptadas para
 el tonelaje del nuevo buque y el tonelaje desguazado.
 su ejecución y de las sanciones apropiadas en caso de
 infracción.
 Estas condiciones no se aplicarán a los buques cuyo pro-
 pietario demuestre que estaban en proceso de construc- 2. Durante el período de una acción de desguace, los
 ción en la fecha en que se decidió una acción de des- Estados miembros comunicarán cada seis meses a la Co-
 guace. misión toda la información útil sobre la evolución de la
 acción en curso y, en particular, sobre la situación finan-
 ciera del fondo, el número de solicitudes de desguace
 2. En caso de sobrecapacidades estructurales graves,
 presentadas y el tonelaje efectivamente desguazado.
 que puedan persistir en la navegación interior de la Co-
 munidad o en uno de sus mercados, la Comisión, previa 3. La Comisión adoptará, a más tardar, el 30 de no-
 consulta a las organizaciones representativas de la nave- viembre de 1988, las decisiones que le incumba tomar en
 gación interior a escala comunitaria y de común acuerdo virtud del artículo 6 y, en su caso, en virtud del apartado
 con los Estados miembros interesados, podrá decidir que 2 del artículo 8.
 los valores previstos en el apartado 1 respecto del tone-
 laje que deberá desguazarse y las cotizaciones especiales Artículo 12
 que deberán abonarse para la puesta en servicio de nue-
 vas capacidades de carga se aumenten hasta alcanzar el El presente Reglamento entrará en vigor el 1 de julio de
 doble de esos valores. 1988.
 El presente Reglamento será obligatorio en todos sus
 La Comisión fijará al mismo tiempo el período de aplica- elementos y directamente aplicable en cada Estado
 ción de esta medida. miembro.


type: contracts

text:
 7.9.2006
 SV
 Europeiska unionens officiella tidning
 L 245/40
 GEMENSAMMA EES-KOMMITTÉNS BESLUT nr 70/2006
 av den 2 juni 2006
 om ändring av bilaga XXI (Statistik) till EES-avtalet
 GEMENSAMMA EES-KOMMITTÉN HAR BESLUTAT FÖLJANDE
 med beaktande av avtalet om Europeiska ekonomiska samarbetsområdet, ändrat genom protokollet med justeringar av avtalet om Europeiska ekonomiska samarbetsområdet, nedan kallat ”avtalet”, särskilt artikel 98, och
 av följande skäl:
 (1)
 Bilaga XXI till avtalet ändrades genom gemensamma EES-kommitténs beslut nr 52/2006 av den 28 april 2006 (1).
 (2)
 Europaparlamentets och rådets förordning (EG) nr 1552/2005 av den 7 september 2005 om statistik över yrkesutbildning på företag (2) bör införlivas med avtalet.
 (3)
 Europaparlamentets och rådets förordning (EG) nr 1553/2005 av den 7 september 2005 om ändring av förordning (EG) nr 1177/2003 om gemenskapsstatistik över inkomst- och levnadsvillkor (EU-SILC) (3) bör införlivas med avtalet.
 (4)
 Kommissionens förordning (EG) nr 1722/2005 av den 20 oktober 2005 om principerna för skattning av boendetjänster i enlighet med rådets förordning (EG, Euratom) nr 1287/2003 om harmonisering av bruttonationalinkomsten till marknadspris (4) bör införlivas med avtalet.
 (5)
 Kommissionens rekommendation KOM(2005) 217 av den 25 maj 2005 om medlemsstaternas och gemenskapens statistikmyndigheters oberoende, integritet och ansvar (5) bör införlivas med avtalet.
 HÄRIGENOM FÖRESKRIVS FÖLJANDE.
 Artikel 1
 Bilaga XXI till avtalet skall ändras på följande sätt:
 1.
 Följande punkt skall införas efter punkt 18p (kommissionens förordning (EG) nr 13/2005):
 ”18q.
 32005 R 1552: Europaparlamentets och rådets förordning (EG) nr 1552/2005 av den 7 september 2005 om statistik över yrkesutbildning på företag (EUT L 255, 30.9.2005, s. 1).
 Bestämmelserna i förordningen skall, inom ramen för detta avtal, tillämpas med följande anpassning:
 Denna förordning skall inte gälla Island och Liechtenstein”
 .
 2.
 Följande skall läggas till i punkt 18i (Europaparlamentets och rådets förordning (EG) nr 1177/2003):
 ”, ändrad genom:
 —
 32005 R 1553: Europaparlamentets och rådets förordning (EG) nr 1553/2005 av den 7 september 2005 (EUT L 255, 30.9.2005, s. 6)”
 .
 3.
 Följande punkt skall införas efter punkt 19t (Europaparlamentets och rådets förordning (EG) nr 1161/2005):
 ”19u.
 32005 R 1722: Kommissionens förordning (EG) nr 1722/2005 av den 20 oktober 2005 om principerna för skattning av boendetjänster i enlighet med rådets förordning (EG, Euratom) nr 1287/2003 om harmonisering av bruttonationalinkomsten till marknadspris (EUT L 276, 21.10.2005, s. 5)”
 .
 4.
 Följande skall införas efter punkt 17b (kommissionens förordning (EG) nr 831/2002):
 ”RÄTTSAKTER SOM DE AVTALSSLUTANDE PARTERNA SKALL BEAKTA
 De avtalsslutande parterna beaktar följande rättsakt:
 17c.
 52005 PC 0217: Kommissionens rekommendation KOM (2005) 217 av den 25 maj 2005 om medlemsstaternas och gemenskapens statistikmyndigheters oberoende, integritet och ansvar (EUT C 172, 12.7.2005, s. 22)”
 .
 Artikel 2
 Texterna till förordning (EG) nr 1552/2005 på norska samt förordning (EG) nr 1553/2005, förordning (EG) nr 1722/2005 och rekommendation KOM(2005) 217 på isländska och norska, som skall offentliggöras i EES-supplementet till Europeiska unionens officiella tidning, skall vara giltiga.
 Artikel 3
 Detta beslut träder i kraft den 3 juni 2006, under förutsättning att alla anmälningar enligt artikel 103.1 i avtalet har gjorts till gemensamma EES-kommittén (6).
 Artikel 4
 Detta beslut skall offentliggöras i EES-delen av och EES-supplementet till Europeiska unionens officiella tidning.
 Utfärdat i Bryssel den 2 juni 2006.
 På gemensamma EES-kommitténs vägnar
 Ordförande
 R. WRIGHT
 (1) EUT L 175, 29.6.2006, s. 103.
 (2) EUT L 255, 30.9.2005, s. 1.
 (3) EUT L 255, 30.9.2005, s. 6.
 (4) EUT L 276, 21.10.2005, s. 5.
 (5) EUT C 172, 12.7.2005, s. 22.
 (6) Inga konstitutionella krav angivna.


type: wikipedia

text:
Viggo Lauritz Bentheim Hørup (22. maj 1841 i Torpmagle ved Hundested – 15. februar 1902 i København) var en dansk cand. jur., politiker, redaktør og minister, der var en ledende skikkelse i oppositionen mod ministeriet Estrup i anden halvdel af 1800-tallet.
 Levnedsforløb
 Viggo Hørup blev født i 1841 i Torpmagle, hvor hans far, Frederik Bendtsen Hørup (f. 1811), var skolelærer 1838-88. Her var han trods forældrenes relativt høje sociale status, opmærksom på de sociale og økonomiske problemer, som prægede landsbyen. Gennem sin mor Emilie Julie f. Drachmann (f. 1806) var han fætter til Holger Drachmann. Han blev sendt til København for at få en uddannelse. Skolegangen var præget af streng disciplin med pryglestraf, som fik ham i opposition til den fremherskende skolepolitik, og dette prægede hans syn på skole og dannelse resten af livet. Hørup blev på trods heraf student i 1861 fra Metropolitanskolen og cand. jur. i 1867 med godt resultat ved sin embedseksamen.
 Viggo blev 18. juli 1868 gift med sin fem år ældre kusine og viceskoleinspektør på De forenede Kirkeskoler i Nørregade, Emma Holmsted. Familien boede først på kvisten i Nørregade og levede i mange år under kummerlige forhold.
 Fra 1872 indgik Viggo i et forhold til parrets kusine Henriette Steen, som fortsatte til hendes død i 1894. Viggo og Emma forblev dog i ægteskabet af hensyn til deres to børn og hans politiske karriere.
 Han stillede op til Folketinget i 1872 i sin hjemegn i Frederiksborg Amt, men blev ikke valgt. Derimod lykkedes det ham i februar 1876 at blive valgt for Københavns Amts 4. kreds (Køge). Hørup tabte sit folketingsmandat i 1892 til den moderate venstremand højesteretssagfører P.A. Alberti, som i valgkampen havde held med at stemple ham som "en åben dør mod socialismen." Hørup skulle senere blive én af denne anløbne og bedrageriske persons allerskarpeste kritikere. Hørup havde kun været folketingsmand ét år, da hans parti i februar 1877 udpegede ham til anklager i rigsretssagerne mod de nationalliberale tidligere ministre Hall og Krieger. En opgave han klarede godt, trods sin korte erfaring som sagfører.
 Han var medstifter af og formand for "Onsdagsforeningen" det første forsøg på at samle den svage opposition i hovedstaden. Da Venstre deltes i foråret 1878, sluttede Hørup sig uden betænkning til den radikale gruppe og var næst efter Christen Berg dens leder.
 I 1891-1894 protesterede Viggo Hørup kraftigt mod den politiske linje, hvor Frede Bojsen som repræsentant for Det Moderate Venstre opgav provisorietidens visnepolitik. Han anså dette for at være en accept af Estrups statskup og deltog i stiftelsen af Venstrereformpartiet året efter. Svækket af sygdom spillede han en fremtrædende rolle ved dannelsen af Ministeriet Deuntzer, som betegnede systemskiftet i dansk politik i juli 1901. Han døde af knoglekræft den 15. februar 1902. Han regnes sammen med brødrene Brandes for en af kulturradikalismens grundlæggere og i 1905 - tre år efter hans død - stiftede en række af hans meningsfæller Det Radikale Venstre.
 Politikeren
 Hørup kom i Folketinget ved valget i 1876. Han var radikal i ordets oprindelige betydning og derfor ikke indstillet på små skridt gennem langsomme reformer. De mere moderate venstrefolk betegnede han engang som ””reformidioter””.
 På et folkemøde i Eksercerhuset 30. december 1878 gav han sin opfattelse af målet med den langsigtede strategi udtryk i de bekendte ord, at "Folketinget er den højeste Myndighed, der har ingen over sig og ingen ved siden af sig", en udtalelse som både udfordrede kongemagten og Landstinget. . Han har gennem sit provokerende ordvalg utvivlsomt skadet Venstres sag og givet modstanderne et godt våben i hænde, ligesom hans hånlige udfald imod forsvarssagen ("den døde Torsk") og dens talsmænd ("omvandrende Lirekasser") formentlig medvirkede til at fremme denne sag og ophidse dens tilhængere til handling. Hans berømte ord fra folketingets talerstol om militæret ”Hvad skal det nytte?” skaffede ham ligeledes modstandere i det politiske spektrum. Men selv om Hørups dristigste ordvalg kan virke forargende, er det en fejlagtig opfattelse at opfatte ham som populist. Han stil må ses på baggrund af forfatningskampen og dennes historiske betydning. Hans engagement i udviklingen af demokratiet støttede sig dels på, at alle uanset stand og indkomst skulle have lige adgang og ret til at deltage i valghandlinger. Samtidig var det ham magtpåliggende, at alle havde ret til at ytre sig og "dele sig efter anskuelser". Dette kunne kun lade sig gøre, hvis demokratiet fungerede i et retssamfund. Alle borgere skulle ifølge Hørup være lige overfor staten uanset deres baggrund.
 Rigsdagsmand
 Hørup var medlem af Folketinget, indvalgt i Københavns Amt, 4. kreds fra 10. marts 1876 til 20. april 1892)
 Hørup holdt sig i de første par år af sit rigsdagsliv holdt sig temmelig tilbagetrukket i debatterne. I oktober 1878 blev han medlem af Finansudvalget og genvalgtes hertil, så længe han sad i Rigsdagen; endvidere var han i samlingen 1879 (februar-juni) tingets 2. viceformand og valgtes samme år til statsrevisor. I dette embede han blev genvalgt indtil 1892.
 Fra samlingen 1878-79 vakte han stor opmærksomhed som en ypperlig og ejendommelig taler, klar og skarp i sin tanke, rig på slående billeder og vittige vendinger, bitter og hensynsløst spydig imod modstanderne. Med megen styrke hævdede han den radikale læresætning om Folketingets ubetingede overvægt i det offentlige liv som en naturlig følge af det konstitutionelle system og særlig af vores grundlov. Som rigsdagsmand følte Hørup sig fortrinsvis tiltrukket af den store politiske kamp og tog ellers kun lidt del i forhandlingerne. Det egentlige lovgivningsarbejde havde nemlig i hans øjne en aldeles underordnet værdi i sammenligning med magtspørgsmålet, og hans navn ses derfor sjældent i rækkerne på udvalgsordførere. I samlingen 1879-80 talte han dog for de to store love om sparekasser og om vands afledning. Visnepolitikken i årene 1882-86 tiltalte ham i særlig grad, og som Finansudvalgets formand 1883-84 hjalp han villigt ordføreren Ludvig Holstein-Ledreborg med at forhale Finanslovens behandling. For Hørup var det hovedopgaven at arbejde for partiet i og uden for Rigsdagen og at udbrede de radikale grundsætninger blandt folket; han stolede på, at de ville bære en rig, om end sen, høst. Hørup har derfor haft langt større betydning som agitator i tale og skrift end som praktisk politiker. I margarinekrigen i 1888 handlede han dog meget konkret, bl.a. ved at danne et Forretningsudvalg til oplysning om faren ved kunstsmør, som er blevet betegnet som en taktisk manøvre, der skulle splitte Højre.
 Trafikminister
 Hørup var Minister for offentlige arbejder fra 24. juli 1901 til sin død 15. februar 1902) i Ministeriet Deuntzer.
 Da Deuntzer den 16. juli 1901 havde påtaget sig opgaven som forhandlingsleder med henblik på at danne et ministerium, der kunne opnå flertal i folketinget, henvendte han sig først til I.C. Christensen, dernæst til Hørup, som lederne af de to stærkeste fløje i Venstrereformpartiet. Hørup afslog i første omgang at indgå i ministeriet, men pegede på Ludvig Holstein-Ledreborg som kandidat for sin fløj sammen med Christopher Hage. Holstein-Ledreborg ønskede imidlertid ikke at genoptage sin politiske karriere efter 11 års fravær, og efter langvarige forhandlinger lykkedes det at overtale Hørup til at overtage det ledige ministerium.
 Viggo Hørups tid som trafikminister i den første regering efter systemskiftet blev så kort, at han ikke nåede at deltage i møder i statsrådet. Han havde ikke tidligere beskæftiget sig med trafikforhold og nåede ikke at gøre sig gældende på området i de syv måneder, han var minister, på grund af den sygdom, han allerede led af inden udnævnelsen.
 Som ansvarlig for De kongelige Haver gennemførte han i august 1901 åbningen af Kongeporten på hjørnet af Kronprinsessegade og Gothersgade, som fører ind i Kongens Have. Hans statue (udført af J.F. Willumsen) blev i 1908 placeret i denne ende af Kongens Have. Statuen blev under Besættelsen ødelagt ved et bombeattentat, men er rekonstrueret.
 Redaktør
 I 1873 blev Hørup tilknyttet det nystiftede venstreblad Morgenbladet og var det indtil foråret 1877. I januar 1881 blev han udgiver af bladet sammen med Christen Berg og Edvard Brandes og var i tre år den egentlige redaktør. Han skabte en trofast læserkreds for bladet virkeligt i hovedstaden, men blev alligevel afskediget ved udgangen af 1883, fordi Berg var misfornøjet med de politiske ideer, som kom til orde og desuden søgte tilnærmelse til det moderate Venstre. Da Berg i november 1884 fik gennemført en sammenslutning mellem denne gruppe og den ene halvdel af den radikale gruppe i «det danske Venstre», blev Hørup leder af den anden halvdel, der nu sædvanligvis kaldtes "Europæerne", indtil den sidste sammenslutning af Venstre fandt sted i februar 1886. Ligeledes havde han siden maj 1882 været én af sin gruppes delegerede ved samråd med de andre grupper og blev senere medlem af partiets fælles bestyrelse.
 I oktober 1884 grundlagde Hørup, Edvard Brandes og Hermann Meyer Bing Politiken, der snart blev et af de mest udbredte og vistnok det mest læste blad i hele landet, og som efterhånden skaffede Venstre en indflydelse i København og købstæderne, som intet tidligere blad havde formået. Hans litterære stil og skarpe agitation var medvirkende til at ”fravriste De Nationalliberale deres monopol” på meningsdannelsen blandt borgerne, men også arbejdere og akademikere støttede Hørups ideer.
 Som redaktør måtte han i vinteren 1889-90 udstå en tre måneders fængselsstraf for overtrædelse af presseprovisoriet, men hædredes ved sin løsladelse med rige gaver fra sine meningsfæller.
 Ægteskab
 Viggo Hørup ægtede 18. juli 1868 sin fem år ældre kusine, viceskoleinspektør Emma Augusta Holmsted (3. august 1836 – 22. september 1923), datter af Amalie Drachmann (1802-78) og gymnastiklærer Jonas Ferdinand Holmsted (1810-66). Familien levede beskedent og måtte efter hans tab af folketingsmandatet i 1892 flytte til Rigensgade, der nærmest lå i et fattigkvarter. Bjørnstjerne Bjørnson betegnede efter et besøg hos familien bopælen som en ”rendesten”. I 1896 flyttede familien tilbage til Nørregade, og da Politikens oplag steg eksplosivt fik han i 1898 råd til et mindre landsted ved Brede.
 Sønnen Svend var en stille dreng som havde svært ved skolen, men blev student ved moderen, Emmas, hjælp. I 1888 fik han et psykisk sammenbrud og blev indlagt på Kommunehospitalets 6. afdeling. Han døde i 1895.
 Viggos datter Ellen Hørup fulgte i forældrenes politiske fodspor og er også kendt som den første danske kvindelige roer og racercyklist.
 Død
 Han døde 15. februar 1902, mens han stadig var minister for offentlige arbejder (trafikminister). Viggo Hørup ligger begravet på Gentofte Kirkegård sammen med sin kone og to børn – Svend Hørup (1870-1895) og Ellen Hørup (1871-1953)
 Litteratur
 Erik Arup, Viggo Hørup, Politiken, 1941.
 Dansk biografisk leksikon
 Kilder
 Eksterne henvisninger
 Jeppe Aakjær skrev ved hans død i 1902 et digt til minde om – Redaktør Viggo Hørup – kalliope
 Fortrinlige Skatteobjekter – Viggo Hørups artikel om kultur og skatter.
 Viggo Hørup på Litteraturpriser.dk
 Anmeldelse i Politiken 9. februar 2004 af Søren Mørch: Hørup er med! <(2004) Ekstra Bladets Forlag.
 Chefredaktører fra Danmark
 Journalister fra Danmark
 Jurister fra Danmark
 Transportministre fra Danmark
 Danskere i 1800-tallet
 Kulturradikale personer
 Folketingsmedlemmer i 1870'erne
 Folketingsmedlemmer i 1880'erne
 Folketingsmedlemmer i 1890'erne
 Tidligere folketingsmedlemmer fra Venstre
 Journalister ved Politiken
 Personer i Dansk Biografisk Leksikon
 Personer fra Hundested
 Studenter fra Metropolitanskolen


text:
 Fontos jogi nyilatkozat
 |
 21997D0313(10)
 Hivatalos Lap L 071 , 13/03/1997 o. 0042 - 0042
 Az EGT-Vegyesbizottság 69/96 határozata(1996. november 27.)az EGT-megállapodás XX. mellékletének (Környezet) módosításárólAZ EGT-VEGYESBIZOTTSÁG,tekintettel az Európai Gazdasági Térségről szóló megállapodásra (a továbbiakban: a megállapodás), az Európai Gazdasági Térségről szóló megállapodás kiigazításáról szóló jegyzőkönyvvel módosított, és különösen annak 98. cikkére,mivel a megállapodás XX. mellékletét a 22/95 EGT-vegyesbizottsági határozat [1] módosította;mivel a hulladékokról szóló 75/442/EGK tanácsi irányelv IIA. és IIB. mellékletének kiigazításáról szóló, 1996. május 24-i 96/350/EK bizottsági határozatot [2] be kell építeni a megállapodásba,A KÖVETKEZŐKÉPPEN HATÁROZOTT:1. cikkA megállapodás XX. mellékletének 27. pontja (75/442/EGK tanácsi irányelv) a következő francia bekezdéssel egészül ki:"- 396 D 0350: A Bizottság 1996. május 24-i 96/350/EK határozata (HL L 135., 1996.6.6., 32. o.)."2. cikkA 96/350/EK bizottsági határozat izlandi és norvég nyelvű szövegei, melyek e határozat megfelelő nyelvi változatának mellékletét képezik, hitelesek.3. cikkEz a határozat 1996. december 1-jén lép hatályba, amennyiben a Megállapodás 103. cikkének (1) bekezdése szerint előírt értesítéseket eljuttatták az EGT-Vegyesbizottsághoz.4. cikkEzt a határozatot az Európai Közösségek Hivatalos Lapjának EGT-re vonatkozó részében, illetve EGT-kiegészítésében közzé kell tenni.Kelt Brüsszelben, 1996. november 27-én.az EGT-Vegyesbizottság részérőlaz elnökH. Hafstein[1] HL L 158., 1995.7.8., 46. o.[2] HL L 135., 1996.6.6., 32. o.--------------------------------------------------


text:
 23.2.2018
 BG
 Официален вестник на Европейския съюз
 L 53/1
 РЕГЛАМЕНТ ЗА ИЗПЪЛНЕНИЕ (ЕС) 2018/238 НА КОМИСИЯТА
 от 15 февруари 2018 година
 за разрешаване на употребата на динатриеви 5′-рибонуклеотиди, динатриев 5′-гуанилат и динатриев 5′-инозинат като фуражни добавки за всички видове животни
 (текст от значение за ЕИП)
 ЕВРОПЕЙСКАТА КОМИСИЯ,
 като взе предвид Договора за функционирането на Европейския съюз,
 като взе предвид Регламент (ЕО) No 1831/2003 на Европейския парламент и на Съвета от 22 септември 2003 г. относно добавки за използване при храненето на животните (1), и по-специално член 9, параграф 2 от него,
 като има предвид, че:
 (1)
 В Регламент (ЕО) No 1831/2003 се предвижда разрешителен режим за добавките, предвидени за употреба при храненето на животните, и се посочват основанията и процедурите за предоставянето на такова разрешение. В член 10 от посочения регламент се предвижда извършването на повторна оценка на добавките, чиято употреба е разрешена съгласно Директива 70/524/ЕИО на Съвета (2).
 (2)
 В съответствие с Директива 70/524/ЕИО бе разрешена безсрочната употреба на динатриеви 5′-рибонуклеотиди, динатриев 5′-гуанилат и динатриев 5′-инозинат („разглежданите вещества“) като фуражни добавки за всички видове животни. Впоследствие посочените продукти бяха вписани в Регистъра на фуражните добавки като съществуващи продукти в съответствие с член 10, параграф 1 от Регламент (ЕО) No 1831/2003.
 (3)
 В съответствие с член 10, параграф 2 от Регламент (ЕО) No 1831/2003 във връзка с член 7 от същия регламент беше подадено заявление за извършване на повторна оценка на разглежданите вещества като фуражни добавки за всички видове животни. Заявителят подаде искане добавките да се класифицират в категорията „сензорни добавки“. Посоченото заявление беше придружено от данните и документите, изисквани съгласно член 7, параграф 3 от Регламент (ЕО) No 1831/2003. Наскоро заявителят оттегли заявлението за вода за пиене.
 (4)
 В становището си от 4 март 2014 г. (3) Европейският орган за безопасност на храните („Органът“) заключи, че при предложените условия на употреба разглежданите вещества не се отразяват неблагоприятно върху здравето на животните и на човека, нито върху околната среда. Органът също така заключи, че функцията на разглежданите вещества във фуражите е подобна на тази в храните. Органът вече заключи, че разглежданите вещества са ефикасни за храните, тъй като увеличават хранителните качества, свързани с мириса или вкуса. Поради това посоченото заключение може да се екстраполира за фуражи. Заявителят оттегли заявлението за вода за пиене. Разглежданите вещества обаче може да се използват в комбинирани фуражи, които впоследствие се приемат с вода.
 (5)
 Следва да се предвидят ограничения и условия, за да се постигне по-добър контрол. Тъй като няма съображения във връзка с безопасността, които да налагат определянето на максимално съдържание, и като се вземе предвид извършената от Органа повторна оценка, върху етикета на добавката следва да бъде указано препоръчително съдържание. Ако препоръчителното съдържание е надвишено, върху етикета на премиксите и при етикетиране на фуражните суровини и комбинираните фуражи следва да бъде посочена определена информация.
 (6)
 Органът също така заключи, че при липсата на данни разглежданите вещества следва да се считат за потенциално опасни за работниците при експозиция на кожата, очите и лигавиците или при вдишване. Поради това следва да се вземат съответните предпазни мерки. Органът не счита, че са необходими специални изисквания за мониторинг след пускането на пазара. Той също така провери доклада относно метода за анализ на фуражните добавки във фуражите, представен от референтната лаборатория, определена с Регламент (ЕО) No 1831/2003.
 (7)
 При оценката на разглежданите вещества беше установено, че предвидените в член 5 от Регламент (ЕО) No 1831/2003 условия за издаване на разрешение са изпълнени, освен при разглежданите вещества, получени чрез ферментация. Заявителят поиска разрешаване на употребата на разглежданите вещества, получени чрез ферментация и хидролиза на РНК. Липсата на информация относно производствените щамове не позволява да се направи оценка на безопасността на разглежданите вещества, получени чрез ферментация, въпреки че те сами по себе си са безопасни. Употребата на разглежданите вещества следва да бъде съответно разрешена съгласно предвиденото в приложението към настоящия регламент, а разрешението за получените чрез ферментация добавки следва да бъде отказано.
 (8)
 Тъй като няма съображения във връзка с безопасността, които да налагат незабавното прилагане на измененията в условията на разрешението за разглежданите вещества, е целесъобразно да се предвиди преходен период, за да се даде възможност на заинтересованите страни да предприемат необходимото, за да спазят новите изисквания, произтичащи от разрешението.
 (9)
 Мерките, предвидени в настоящия регламент, са в съответствие със становището на Постоянния комитет по растенията, животните, храните и фуражите,
 ПРИЕ НАСТОЯЩИЯ РЕГЛАМЕНТ:
 Член 1
 Разрешаване
 Разрешава се употребата на посочените в приложението вещества, които принадлежат към категорията „сензорни добавки“ и към функционалната група „ароматизиращи вещества“, като фуражни добавки при храненето на животните, при спазване на условията, определени в същото приложение.
 Член 2
 Отказване на разрешение
 Разрешението на употребата на динатриеви 5′-рибонуклеотиди, динатриев 5′-гуанилат и динатриев 5′-инозинат, получени чрез ферментация, се отказва.
 Член 3
 Преходни мерки
 1. Веществата, посочени в приложението и в член 2, и съдържащите ги премикси, които са произведени и етикетирани преди 15 декември 2018 г. в съответствие с правилата, приложими преди 15 март 2018 г., могат да продължат да се пускат на пазара и да се употребяват до изчерпване на складовите наличности.
 2. Комбинираните фуражи и фуражните суровини, които съдържат посочените в приложението и в член 2 вещества и са произведени и етикетирани преди 15 септември 2019 г. в съответствие с правилата, приложими преди 15 март 2018 г., могат да продължат да се пускат на пазара и да се употребяват до изчерпване на складовите наличности, ако са предназначени за животни, отглеждани за производство на храни.
 3. Комбинираните фуражи и фуражните суровини, които съдържат посочените в приложението и в член 2 вещества и са произведени и етикетирани преди 15 септември 2020 г. в съответствие с правилата, приложими преди 15 март 2018 г., могат да продължат да се пускат на пазара и да се употребяват до изчерпване на складовите наличности, ако са предназначени за животни, които не се отглеждат за производство на храни.
 Член 4
 Влизане в сила
 Настоящият регламент влиза в сила на двадесетия ден след деня на публикуването му в Официален вестник на Европейския съюз.
 Настоящият регламент е задължителен в своята цялост и се прилага пряко във всички държави членки.
 Съставено в Брюксел на 15 февруари 2018 година.
 За Комисията
 Председател
 Jean-Claude JUNCKER
 (1) ОВ L 268, 18.10.2003 г., стр. 29.
 (2) Директива 70/524/ЕИО на Съвета от 23 ноември 1970 г. относно добавките при храненето на животни (ОВ L 270, 14.12.1970 г., стр. 1).
 (3) EFSA Journal (Бюлетин на ЕОБХ), 2014; 12(3):3606.
 ПРИЛОЖЕНИЕ
 Идентификационен номер на добавката
 Наименование на притежателя на разрешението
 Добавка
 Състав, химична формула, описание, метод за анализ
 Вид или категория на животните
 Максимална възраст
 Минимално съдържание
 Максимално съдържание
 Други разпоредби
 Срок на валидност на разрешението
 mg активно вещество/kg пълноценен фураж със съдържание на влага 12 %
 Категория: „сензорни добавки“. Функционална група: „ароматизиращи вещества“.
 2b635
 —
 Динатриев 5′-рибонуклеотид
 Състав на добавката
 Динатриеви 5′-рибонуклеотиди
 Характеристика на активното вещество
 Динатриеви 5′-рибонуклеотиди: смес от динатриев 5′-гуанилат (GMP) и динатриев 5′-инозинат (IMP).
 Получено чрез хидролиза на РНК
 Чистота: минимум 97 % при изследване
 Химична формула:
 —
 C10H11N4O8P · nH2O
 —
 C10H12N5Na2 O8P · nH2O
 Метод за анализ
 (1)
 За идентификацията на GMP и IMP във фуражната добавка:
 Монография на СЕКДХ „Спецификации на добавките в храните: динатриеви 5′-рибонуклеотиди“.
 За определянето на GMP и IMP във фуражната добавка и в премиксите на овкусители:
 високоефективна течна хроматография, комбинирана с ултравиолетово откриване (HPLC-UV)
 Всички видове животни
 —
 —
 —
 1.
 Добавката се смесва с фуража под формата на премикс.
 2.
 В упътването за употреба на добавката и премиксите се посочват условията за съхранение и устойчивост.
 3.
 Препоръчителното максимално съдържание на активното вещество или на комбинацията от динатриев 5′-рибонуклеотид (2b635), динатриев 5′-гуанилат (2b627) и динатриев 5′-инозинат (2b631) е:
 50 mg/kg пълноценен фураж със съдържание на влага 12 %.
 4.
 Върху етикета на добавката се посочва следното:
 „Препоръчително максимално съдържание на активното вещество или на комбинацията от динатриев 5′-рибонуклеотид, динатриев 5′-гуанилат и динатриев 5′-инозинат в пълноценен фураж със съдържание на влага 12 %: 50 mg/kg“.
 5.
 Функционалната група, идентификационният номер, наименованието и добавеното количество на активното вещество се посочват върху етикета на премиксите и при етикетиране на фуражните суровини и комбинираните фуражи, ако следното съдържание на активното вещество или на комбинацията от динатриев 5′-рибонуклеотид, динатриев 5′-гуанилат и динатриев 5′-инозинат в пълноценен фураж със съдържание на влага 12 % е превишено: 50 mg/kg.
 6.
 За потребителите на добавката и премиксите стопанските субекти в областта на фуражите трябва да установят процедури за безопасна работа и организационни мерки за преодоляване на потенциалните рискове при вдишване, контакт с кожата или с очите. Когато тези рискове не могат да бъдат отстранени или сведени до минимум чрез споменатите процедури и мерки, добавката и премиксите трябва да се използват с лични предпазни средства, включително предпазна дихателна маска, предпазни очила и ръкавици.
 15.3.2028 г.
 2b627
 —
 Динатриев 5′-гуанилат
 Състав на добавката
 Динатриев 5′-гуанилат (GMP)
 Характеристика на активното вещество
 Динатриев 5′-гуанилат
 Получено чрез хидролиза на РНК
 Чистота: минимум 97 % при изследване
 Химична формула: C10H12N5Na2O8P · n H2O
 CAS No 5550-12-9
 Метод за анализ
 (1)
 За идентификацията на GMP във фуражната добавка:
 Монография на СЕКДХ „Спецификации на добавките в храните: динатриеви 5′-рибонуклеотиди“.
 За определянето на GMP във фуражната добавка и в премиксите на овкусители:
 високоефективна течна хроматография, комбинирана с ултравиолетово откриване (HPLC-UV)
 Всички видове животни
 —
 —
 —
 1.
 Добавката се смесва с фуража под формата на премикс.
 2.
 В упътването за употреба на добавката и премиксите се посочват условията за съхранение и устойчивост.
 3.
 Препоръчителното максимално съдържание на активното вещество или на комбинацията от динатриев 5′-рибонуклеотид (2b635), динатриев 5′-гуанилат (2b627) и динатриев 5′-инозинат (2b631) е:
 50 mg/kg пълноценен фураж със съдържание на влага 12 %.
 4.
 Върху етикета на добавката се посочва следното:
 „Препоръчително максимално съдържание на активното вещество или на комбинацията от динатриев 5′-рибонуклеотид, динатриев 5′-гуанилат и динатриев 5′-инозинат в пълноценен фураж със съдържание на влага 12 %: 50 mg/kg“.
 5.
 Функционалната група, идентификационният номер, наименованието и добавеното количество на активното вещество се посочват върху етикета на премиксите и при етикетиране на фуражните суровини и комбинираните фуражи, ако следното съдържание на активното вещество или на комбинацията от динатриев 5′-рибонуклеотид, динатриев 5′-гуанилат и динатриев 5′-инозинат в пълноценен фураж със съдържание на влага 12 % е превишено: 50 mg/kg.
 6.
 За потребителите на добавката и премиксите стопанските субекти в областта на фуражите трябва да установят процедури за безопасна работа и организационни мерки за преодоляване на потенциалните рискове при вдишване, контакт с кожата или с очите. Когато тези рискове не могат да бъдат отстранени или сведени до минимум чрез споменатите процедури и мерки, добавката и премиксите трябва да се използват с лични предпазни средства, включително предпазна дихателна маска, предпазни очила и ръкавици.
 15.3.2028 г.
 2b631
 —
 Динатриев 5′-инозинат
 Състав на добавката
 Динатриев 5′-инозинат (IMP)
 Характеристика на активното вещество
 Динатриев 5′-инозинат
 Получено чрез хидролиза на РНК
 Чистота: минимум 97 % при изследване
 Химична формула: C10H11 N4O8P · nH2O
 CAS No 4691-65-0
 Метод за анализ
 (1)
 За идентификацията на IMP във фуражната добавка:
 Монография на СЕКДХ „Спецификации на добавките в храните: динатриеви 5′-рибонуклеотиди“.
 За определянето на IMP във фуражната добавка и в премиксите на овкусители:
 високоефективна течна хроматография, комбинирана с ултравиолетово откриване (HPLC-UV)
 Всички видове животни
 —
 —
 —
 1.
 Добавката се смесва с фуража под формата на премикс.
 2.
 В упътването за употреба на добавката и премиксите се посочват условията за съхранение и устойчивост.
 3.
 Препоръчителното максимално съдържание на активното вещество или на комбинацията от динатриев 5′-рибонуклеотид (2b635), динатриев 5′-гуанилат (2b627) и динатриев 5′-инозинат (2b631) е:
 50 mg/kg пълноценен фураж със съдържание на влага 12 %.
 4.
 Върху етикета на добавката се посочва следното:
 „Препоръчително максимално съдържание на активното вещество или на комбинацията от динатриев 5′-рибонуклеотид, динатриев 5′-гуанилат и динатриев 5′-инозинат в пълноценен фураж със съдържание на влага 12 %: 50 mg/kg“.
 5.
 Функционалната група, идентификационният номер, наименованието и добавеното количество на активното вещество се посочват върху етикета на премиксите и при етикетиране на фуражните суровини и комбинираните фуражи, ако следното съдържание на активното вещество или на комбинацията от динатриев 5′-рибонуклеотид, динатриев 5′-гуанилат и динатриев 5′-инозинат в пълноценен фураж със съдържание на влага 12 % е превишено: 50 mg/kg.
 6.
 За потребителите на добавката и премиксите стопанските субекти в областта на фуражите трябва да установят процедури за безопасна работа и организационни мерки за преодоляване на потенциалните рискове при вдишване, контакт с кожата или с очите. Когато тези рискове не могат да бъдат отстранени или сведени до минимум чрез споменатите процедури и мерки, добавката и премиксите трябва да се използват с лични предпазни средства, включително предпазна дихателна маска, предпазни очила и ръкавици.
 15.3.2028 г.
 (1) Подробна информация за методите за анализ може да бъде намерена на следния интернет адрес на референтната лаборатория: https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en/eurl/feed-additives/evaluation-reports.


text:
 Fontos jogi nyilatkozat
 |
 22000D0921(06)
 Hivatalos Lap L 237 , 21/09/2000 o. 0066 - 0067
 Az EGT-Vegyesbizottság 53/2000 határozata(2000. június 28.)az EGT-megállapodás II. mellékletének (műszaki előírások, szabványok, vizsgálatok és tanúsítás) módosításárólAZ EGT-VEGYESBIZOTTSÁG,tekintettel az Európai Gazdasági Térségről szóló, az Európai Gazdasági Térségről szóló megállapodás kiigazításáról szóló jegyzőkönyvvel módosított megállapodásra (a továbbiakban: a Megállapodás), és különösen annak 98. cikkére,mivel:(1) A Megállapodás II. mellékletét a 2000. március 31-i 26/2000 EGT-vegyesbizottsági határozat [1] módosította.(2) A különleges táplálkozási célokra szánt élelmiszerekre vonatkozó tagállami jogszabályok közelítéséről szóló 89/398/EGK irányelv módosításáról szóló, 1996. december 19-i 96/84/EK európai parlamenti és tanácsi irányelvet [2] be kell építeni a Megállapodásba,A KÖVETKEZŐKÉPPEN HATÁROZOTT:1. cikkA Megállapodás II. melléklete XII. fejezetének 51. pontja (89/398/EGK tanácsi irányelv) a következő szöveggel egészül ki:", az alábbi módosításokkal:- 396 L 0084: Az Európai Parlament és a Tanács 1996. december 19-i 96/84/EK irányelve (HL L 48., 1997.2.19., 20. o.).Az irányelv rendelkezéseit a megállapodás alkalmazásában a következő kiigazítással kell alkalmazni:A 4. cikk az 1a. bekezdés utolsó bekezdését követően a következő albekezdéssel egészül ki:"az említett ideiglenes forgalomba hozatali engedély tekintetében, a Szerződő Felek, amennyiben igazolható indokok alapján úgy ítélik meg, hogy egy adott termék kockázatot jelent az emberi egészségre, saját területükön korlátozhatják vagy megtilthatják az adott termék használatát és/vagy értékesítését. Az említett intézkedésről és a döntés indokairól, az EGT-Vegyesbizottságon keresztül haladéktalanul tájékoztatják a többi Szerződő Felet. Ha a Szerződő Felek egyike ilyen kéréssel áll elő, akkor az EGT-Vegyesbizottságban az intézkedés megfelelőségéről konzultációra kerül sor. A Megállapodás VII. része alkalmazandó."."2. cikkA 96/84/EK európai parlamenti és tanácsi irányelv izlandi és norvég nyelvű szövegei, melyeket az Európai Közösségek Hivatalos LapjánakEGT-kiegészítésében közzé kell tenni, hitelesek.3. cikkEz a határozat 2000. június 29-én lép hatályba, amennyiben a Megállapodás 103. cikkének (1) bekezdése szerint előírt összes értesítést eljuttatták az EGT-Vegyesbizottsághoz [3].4. cikkEzt a határozatot az Európai Közösségek Hivatalos Lapjának EGT-re vonatkozó részében, illetve EGT-kiegészítésében közzé kell tenni.Kelt Brüsszelben, 2000. június 28-án.az EGT-Vegyesbizottság részérőlaz elnökF. Barbaso[1] HL L 141., 2000.6.15., 46. o.[2] HL L 48., 1997.2.19., 20. o.[3] Alkotmányos követelmények nem merültek fel.--------------------------------------------------


text:
Vera Lachmann, née le à Berlin et morte le à Manhattan (New York), est une poétesse et éducatrice allemande.
 Biographie
 Après avoir fondé une école pour les enfants juifs en Allemagne nazie, elle émigre aux États-Unis en 1939. Elle fonde en 1944 le camp Catawba dans les Montagnes Blue Ridge, un camp d'été pour les garçons. Elle en assure la direction jusqu'en 1970. À partir de 1946, elle partage sa vie avec la chef d'orchestre Lorraine (dite 'Tui') St. George Tucker.
 Notes et références
 Liens externes
 Écrivain allemand du XXe siècle
 Poétesse allemande
 Étudiant de l'université Humboldt de Berlin
 Professeur au Vassar College
 Professeur au Bryn Mawr College
 Professeur à l'université Yale
 Professeur au City College of New York
 Naissance en juin 1904
 Naissance à Berlin
 Naissance dans le royaume de Prusse
 Décès en janvier 1985
 Décès à Manhattan
 Décès à 80 ans


type: caselaw

text:
5.10.2015
 IT
 Gazzetta ufficiale dell’Unione europea
 C 328/5
 Domanda di pronuncia pregiudiziale proposta dal Finanzgericht Düsseldorf (Germania) il 14 luglio 2015 — Wortmann KG Internationale Schuhproduktionen/Hauptzollamt Bielefeld
 (Causa C-365/15)
 (2015/C 328/04)
 Lingua processuale: il tedesco
 Giudice del rinvio
 Finanzgericht Düsseldorf
 Parti
 Ricorrente: Wortmann KG Internationale Schuhproduktionen
 Resistente: Hauptzollamt Bielefeld
 Questione pregiudiziale
 Se l’articolo 241 del regolamento (CEE) n. 2913/92 del Consiglio, del 12 ottobre 1992, che istituisce un codice doganale comunitario (1), debba essere interpretato nel senso che gli ordinamenti nazionali cui viene ivi fatto riferimento debbano prevedere, in caso di rimborso di dazi all’importazione, in considerazione del principio del diritto dell’Unione di effettività, la corresponsione di interessi dal momento della riscossione dei dazi fino alla completa restituzione delle relative somme, anche nel caso in cui il diritto al rimborso non sia stato fatto valere giudizialmente dinanzi al giudice nazionale.
 (1) GU L 302, pag. 1.


type: other

jurisdiction: US

text: b' Audit of NARA\xe2\x80\x99s\n Photocopier Security\n\n\nOIG Audit Report No. 11-07\n\n\n March 22, 2011\n\x0cTable of Contents\n\n\nExecutive Summary ...................................................................................... 3\n\nBackground ................................................................................................... 5\n\nObjectives, Scope, Methodology .................................................................. 6\n\nAudit Results ................................................................................................. 7\n\nAppendix A \xe2\x80\x93 Photocopiers With Hard Drives........................................ 17\n\nAppendix B - Standard Form 120- Excess Property Report .................. 18\n\nAppendix C - Acronyms and Abbreviations ............................................ 19\n\nAppendix D - Management\xe2\x80\x99s Response to the Report ............................ 20\n\nAppendix E - Report Distribution List ..................................................... 21\n\x0c OIG Audit Report No. 11-07\n\n\nExecutive Summary\n\nThe National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) Office of the Inspector\nGeneral (OIG) performed an audit of NARA\xe2\x80\x99s Photocopier Security. The objective of\nthe audit was to determine if appropriate security measures were in place to safeguard\nand prevent inappropriate release of sensitive information and Personally Identifiable\nInformation (PII) residing on NARA photocopiers that contain hard drives. Specifically\nour review focused on whether (1) NARA used photocopiers that contained hard drives\ncapable of retaining sensitive information and (2) actions taken by NARA to mitigate\nrisks posed by the potential exposure of this sensitive information were adequate.\n\nAn April 2010, CBS investigative news report exposed the potential privacy risks arising\nfrom sensitive and PII information left on the hard drives of excessed photocopiers that\nwere not sanitized prior to disposal. When multiple copies of a document are made,\nusing a photocopier that has a hard drive, the document is scanned once and copies are\nmade from the file that has been saved on the hard drive. The residual data on the hard\ndrive can be accessed, potentially exposing sensitive or PII which could lead to identity\ntheft or fraudulent use of the information. The CBS news investigation found that hard\ndrives of disposed photocopiers contained a plethora of sensitive, confidential, and PII\ndata that was easily retrievable from the photocopier\'s hard drives.\n\nOur audit found that opportunities exist to strengthen controls to ensure photocopier hard\ndrives are protected from potential exposure. Specifically, we found the following\nweaknesses.\n\n \xe2\x80\xa2 NARA lacks appropriate controls to ensure all photocopiers across the agency are\n accounted for and that any hard drives residing on these machines are tracked and\n properly sanitized or destroyed prior to disposal.\n\n \xe2\x80\xa2 There are no policies documenting security measures to be taken for photocopiers\n utilized for general use nor are there procedures to ensure photocopier hard drives\n are sanitized or destroyed prior to disposal or at the end of the lease term.\n\n \xe2\x80\xa2 Photocopier lease agreements and contracts do not include a \xe2\x80\x9ckeep disk\xe2\x80\x9d 1 or\n similar clause as required by NARA\xe2\x80\x99s IT Security Methodology for Media\n Protection Policy version 5.1.\n\nDuring the entrance conference for this review, management informed the OIG that they\nwere aware of the potential risks posed by not properly sanitizing photocopier hard drives\nprior to disposal and had initiated action to address the risks. Specifically, in May 2010,\nNARA\xe2\x80\x99s Office of General Council (NGC) began efforts to identify photocopier\n\n1\n \xe2\x80\x9cKeep Disk\xe2\x80\x9d clause is language within a contract that allows retention of a hard drive should it fail and\nneed to be replaced.\n Page 3\n National Archives and Records Administration\n\x0c OIG Audit Report No. 11-07\n\n\ncontracts and agreements across the agency in order to update them to include\nappropriate security language. Photocopier contracts (whether they have a hard drive or\nnot) are being modified to contain a "keep your hard drive" clause in accordance with\nsection 6 of NARA\'s IT Security Methodology for Media Protection Policy version 5.1.\nHowever, at the end of our fieldwork, NGC reported only 15 of the 79 agreements\nidentified by management have been modified.\n\nThis report contains seven recommendations for addressing our findings. The\nrecommendations in this report, upon adoption, will assist NARA in providing\nappropriate administrative, technical, and physical safeguards over sensitive information\nand PII as required by the Privacy Act.\n\n\n\n\n Page 4\n National Archives and Records Administration\n\x0c OIG Audit Report No. 11-07\n\n\nBackground\n\nAn April 2010, CBS investigative news report brought attention to the potential privacy\nrisks arising from the fact that photocopiers can store digital images of items copied on\ninternal hard drives. The investigation found disposed photocopiers contained a plethora\nof sensitive, confidential, and PII data that was able to be retrieved from photocopier\'s\nhard drives.\nSince 2002, many photocopiers have been manufactured to contain a hard drive with the\ncapability of electronically storing images of documents copied, scanned, or emailed.\nUsually when several copies of a document are made, the document is scanned just once\nand the copies are made from the file that has been saved on the hard drive. The residual\ndata can be accessed by removing the hard drive from the photocopier and connecting it\nto a PC. The hard drive requires special sanitization in order to mitigate the risk of\nunauthorized disclosure of information and to ensure its confidentiality. NARA\xe2\x80\x99s IT\nSecurity Methodology for Media Protection Policy version 5.1 states that information\nsystem media, which includes hard drives, must be sanitized prior to disposal or release.\nSanitization techniques including clearing, purging, and destroying media information\nwould prevent the disclosure of NARA sensitive information when the hard drive is\nreused or disposed.\n\nSafeguarding PII is important to protect individuals, maintain public trust and confidence\nin an organization, and protect the reputation and any legal liability of an organization.\nFor Federal government agencies the Privacy Act of 1974 requires them to establish\nappropriate administrative, technical and physical safeguards to ensure the security and\nconfidentiality of records and to protect against any anticipated threats or hazards to their\nsecurity or integrity which could result in substantial harm, embarrassment,\ninconvenience, or unfairness to any individual on whom information is maintained.\nNARA has responsibility to appropriately safeguard sensitive data and PII, including PII\non hard drives of photocopiers. PII retained on unprotected hard drives could potentially\nbe exposed and lead to identity theft or fraudulent use of the information. In May 2010,\nNARA\xe2\x80\x99s Office of General Council (NGC) began efforts to identify photocopier\ncontracts and agreements across the agency in order to update them to include\nappropriate security language. Photocopier contracts (whether they have a hard drive or\nnot) are being modified to contain a "keep your hard drive" clause in accordance with\nsection 6 of NARA\'s IT Security Methodology for Media Protection Policy version 5.1.\n\nThe Acquisitions Services Division (NAA) within the Office of Administration (NA)\nmaintains responsibility for procuring and managing of general photocopiers across\nNARA. According the Director of NAA, the Office of Presidential Libraries (NL) and\nthe Office of Regional Records Services (NR) have the authority to procure and manage\ntheir own photocopiers.\n\n\n\n Page 5\n National Archives and Records Administration\n\x0c OIG Audit Report No. 11-07\n\n\nObjectives, Scope, Methodology\n\nThe objective of this audit was to determine whether the appropriate security measures\nwere in place to safeguard sensitive information and PII residing on photocopier hard\ndrives upon disposal or while in possession of an outside vendor. Specifically our\nreview focused on whether (1) NARA used photocopiers that contain hard drives capable\nof retaining sensitive information and (2) that actions taken by NARA to mitigate risks\nposed by the potential exposure of this sensitive information were adequate. The audit\nincluded photocopiers across all NARA offices. However, all audit work was performed\nat Archives II in College Park, MD.\n\nWe examined applicable laws, regulations, and NARA guidance including (a) The\nPrivacy Act of 1974; (b) The Federal Information Security Management Act (FISMA) of\n2002; (c) National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Special Publication\n800-88, Guidelines for Media Sanitization; (d) NARA Directive 1608 Protection of\nPersonally Identifiable Information (PII); (e) NARA\xe2\x80\x99s IT Security Methodology for\nMedia Protection; (f) Supplement to NARA 202, Classified Information Security\nProgram Handbook; (g) Transmission of Electronic Media to NARA sites; (h) Asset\nManagement Team Media Tracking and Disposal Plan; (i) Supplement to NARA 241,\nNARA Personal Property Operating Guide; and (j) NARA 236-1, Inventory of\nGovernment Accountable and Sensitive Property.\n\nTo accomplish our objectives we did the following:\n\n \xe2\x80\xa2 Judgmentally selected a sample of NARA owned photocopiers and performed\n research to determine if a hard drive was installed;\n \xe2\x80\xa2 Reviewed disposal and excess property documents from 2005 through 2010 and\n made inquiries with vendors to determine if the model had the capability of\n having a hard drive;\n \xe2\x80\xa2 Reviewed controls over classified photocopiers;\n \xe2\x80\xa2 Reviewed photocopier contracts;\n \xe2\x80\xa2 Held discussions with NARA employees and officials within the Office of\n General Council (NGC), Office of Administration (NA), Office of Acquisition\n Services (NAA), Facilities and Personal Property Management Division (NAF),\n Office of Information Services (NH), and the Office of Regional Records Services\n (NR);\n \xe2\x80\xa2 Reviewed all network printers to identify those with hard drives.\n\nOur audit work was performed between July 2010 and October 2010. We conducted this\nperformance audit in accordance with generally accepted government auditing standards.\nThose standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain sufficient,\nappropriate evidence to provide a reasonable basis for our findings and conclusions based\non our audit objectives. We believe that the evidence obtained provides a reasonable\nbasis for our findings and conclusions based on our audit objectives.\n Page 6\n National Archives and Records Administration\n\x0c OIG Audit Report No. 11-07\n\n\nAudit Results\n\n1. Accountability and controls over photocopier inventory and\n disposals require improvement\nNARA lacks appropriate accountability and adequate management controls to ensure all\nphotocopiers across the agency are accounted for and that any hard drives residing on\nthese machines are tracked and properly sanitized or destroyed prior to disposal.\nSpecifically our audit disclosed: (1) no complete agency-wide inventory of copiers exist,\n(2) copiers containing hard drives have not been identified, (3) copier purpose and use\nhave not been identified, and (4) disposal protocols were not adequate. These conditions\nexist because no group has been assigned responsibility for tracking all photocopiers\nacross the agency and ensuring that any photocopiers containing hard drives are properly\nsanitized prior to disposal. According to NARA\xe2\x80\x99s IT Security Methodology for Media\nProtection Policy version 5.1, NARA must sanitize or destroy information system media\nbefore disposal or release for reuse. In addition, NARA Directive 1608 Protection of\nPersonally Identifiable Information (PII) defines the rules to protect PII from\nunauthorized disclosure and emphasizes the role of NARA users in ensuring appropriate\nsafeguards are in place to protect all NARA systems containing PII. Furthermore,\naccording to NARA 236-1 Inventory of Government Accountable and Sensitive Property\nand NARA 241 NARA Personal Property Operating Guide, accountable property\nincludes borrowed or leased property as well as property having a unit cost of $3,000 or\nmore. Accountable property must be tracked and accounted for in the NARA Personal\nProperty Management System. As a result of the lack of accountability and controls,\nNARA is at risk of inappropriate release of sensitive information and PII data.\n\nDuring the course of our review, we interviewed management to determine who was\nresponsible for accounting for, tracking, and disposing of all photocopiers across the\nagency. No one office claimed responsibility. The Acting Assistant Archivist of NA\nstated that a complete listing of all photocopiers and related hard drives is just not\nmaintained. A property management officer within NAF stated that leased photocopiers\nare not considered accountable property and therefore they are not tracked and that hard\ndrive information was also not tracked by NAF. The Director of NAA indicated that\nNAA did not have a complete listing of all photocopiers across the agency because some\noffices procure photocopiers without going through NAA. He also stated that NAA\nwould not be responsible for maintaining such a list. The Acting Chief Information\nOfficer stated that since photocopiers are not considered computer equipment, they were\nnot responsible for the disposition of them. However, he stated that NH\xe2\x80\x99s disposition\npolicies for hard drives may apply. NGC also stated that they are not responsible for\ntracking this information. Although, NGC has recently taken on efforts to ensure\nphotocopier contracts include the appropriate security language, they have not attempted\nto identify individual photocopiers with hard drives to ensure the correct procedures are\nfollowed when disposing of them.\n\n Page 7\n National Archives and Records Administration\n\x0c OIG Audit Report No. 11-07\n\n\nAdditionally, we also discussed the condition noted above with General Counsel and the\nActing Assistant Archivist for NA. Both agreed that the weaknesses cited represent\nsecurity vulnerabilities that needed management\xe2\x80\x99s attention to ensure appropriate controls\nare identified and put in place to mitigate the risk of potential exposure.\n\nWithout adequate accountability and controls, there is an increased risk of exposure of\nPII or sensitive information that could leave NARA vulnerable.\n\nNo complete agency-wide inventory of photocopiers exist\n\nThere is no complete accurate inventory of photocopiers across the agency and no one\noffice is assigned responsibility to maintain and track such an inventory. The OIG\nattempted to get a complete photocopier listing containing all photocopiers across the\nagency (owned and leased) from NAF and NAA and was not able to obtain a complete\naccurate list. NAF maintains a list of 144 leased photocopiers located within the\nArchives I, Archives II, St Louis, and Suitland offices and a list of 119 owned\nphotocopiers across the agency. However, these lists do not represent a complete\ninventory of all photocopiers (leased and owned) across the agency.\n\nWhen we asked whether a list of leased photocopiers in all offices existed, we were told\nthat leased copiers are not accountable property and therefore not inventoried or in the\nproperty management system. However, according to NARA 236-1 Inventory of\nGovernment Accountable and Sensitive Property and NARA 241 Personal Property\nOperating Guide, accountable property includes borrowed or leased property as well as\nproperty having a unit cost of $3,000 or more. Accountable property must be tracked and\naccounted for in the NARA Personal Property Management System. We discussed this\nwith the property management officer within NAF who agreed that leased photocopiers\nshould be tracked.\n\nNAF management maintains a list of 119 owned photocopiers across the agency in the\nPPMS system. However, through discussions and contact with various NARA personnel\nand offices we identified at least six additional NARA owned photocopiers that were not\non the NAF list (see below). All six machines had an acquisition cost of $3,000 or more\nand according to NARA 236-1 and 241 they should have been tracked and accounted for\nin the NARA Personal Property Management System.\n\n\n Acquisition\nCopier Make Serial Number Location Cost\nCannon IR5000 MPL62529 Morrow $3,286.56\nCannon IR5000 MPL09414 Morrow $3,000.00\n Atlanta Federal\nCannon IR3300 MRJ03267 Records Center $3,166.68\n Atlanta Federal\nCannon IR4570 SKU1895 Records Center $3,868.32\n Page 8\n National Archives and Records Administration\n\x0c OIG Audit Report No. 11-07\n\n\nCanon IR 3300G MRJ02983 Carter Library $6,709.43\nKonica/Minolta\nbizhub C550 A00J011000421 Bush Library $11,364.30\n\n\nPhotocopiers containing hard drives have not been identified\n\nNeither the list of owned photocopiers nor the list of leased photocopiers obtained from\nNAF identified photocopiers with hard drives. We requested this information from NAF\nand were told this information was not known because no one was keeping track of it. To\nidentify whether any of the photocopiers had a hard drive installed, we took a sample of\n69 photocopiers from the list of 119 owned photocopiers acquired since 2005. We made\ninquiries with the photocopier manufacturers to determine if the photocopiers had hard\ndrives. We gave the manufacturers the make, model, and serial number to identify if the\nspecific model had a hard drive installed on it. In addition, we obtained information from\nthe NARA regional and library offices on leased or owned photocopiers with hard drives.\nOur analysis revealed a total of 34 photocopiers currently at NARA (both leased and\nowned) that have a hard drive installed on them. One of the 34 photocopiers identified as\nhaving a hard drive is used for classified reproduction (See appendix A). We could not be\nreasonably sure that this is a complete listing of all photocopiers across the agency that\ncontains hard drives since there is no tracking of all photocopiers across the agency.\n\nWithout having a complete list of all photocopiers across the agency and whether they\ncontain a hard drive, NARA is lacking the administrative safeguards to protect PII that\nmay reside on photocopiers hard drives.\n\nPhotocopier purpose and use have not been identified\n\nThe lists of owned and leased photocopiers we obtained from NAF did not indicate\nwhether the photocopiers were used for classified or general copying. This would be of\nimportance to NAS since they are responsible for tracking classified information. The\nlists did not document where classified photocopiers were located and who was\nresponsible for them. There are additional controls and security measures that are to be in\nplace for classified photocopiers. Specifically the following additional controls and\nsecurity measures are required.\n\n \xe2\x80\xa2 Classified reproduction equipment must be located in a secure area or, access\n must be restricted while copying is in progress.\n \xe2\x80\xa2 All machines used for classified reproduction should incorporate as many security\n design features as possible (e.g., lock, copy counter, removable hard drives,\n encryption of data prior to being stored in memory and on hard drive, all memory\n automatically cleared after copy).\n \xe2\x80\xa2 Photocopiers located outside of secure areas that are authorized for classified\n reproduction must not have hard drives or the capacity to retain memory or\n images.\n\n Page 9\n National Archives and Records Administration\n\x0c OIG Audit Report No. 11-07\n\n\n \xe2\x80\xa2 Classified photocopiers must be sanitized before allowing maintenance personnel\n access to the machine. Copier maintenance personnel must be escorted and\n closely monitored by appropriately cleared NARA staff whenever they service\n equipment authorized for classified reproduction.\n\nWithout this information, management cannot perform appropriate oversight to properly\ntrack photocopiers and ensure that appropriate controls are being implemented over them.\n\nDisposal protocols for photocopiers were not adequate\nPhotocopier disposals are not adequately tracked and documented and NARA did not\nensure that hard drives on excessed photocopiers were sanitized prior to disposal. Based\non our audit work, we identified that photocopiers have been disposed of in the last five\nyears which had the potential of having a hard drive installed on them.\n\nThe OIG obtained 17 excess property and destruction reports from the requested period\nof 2005 through 2010 to determine if any photocopiers disposed contained a hard drive.\nExcess property and destruction reports were not filed in one central location or\nsequentially. Some were filed in boxes and some online using the Standard Form 120.\nAdditionally these forms in some cases were either filled out inaccurately or were\nincomplete. None of the forms indicated whether the photocopier being excessed\ncontained a hard drive and whether the hard drive was sanitized. Therefore, we\nconcluded that photocopier disposals are not adequately tracked and we could not be\nreasonably certain that we obtained a complete listing of all photocopier disposals within\nthe last five years.\n\nWe made inquiries with the photocopier manufacturers to determine if any of the\nphotocopiers listed on those excess reports had a hard drive. We gave them the make and\nmodel to identify if the specific model had the capability of having a hard drive installed\non it. Of the 39 photocopiers that were disposed of during this time frame by the agency,\nthere were 19 photocopiers with the potential of having a hard drive installed on them\n(see below). There was no documentation available to ascertain whether hard drives were\nin fact installed on these machines or that hard drives were removed and sanitized or\ndestroyed prior to disposal.\n\n SF 120 Report Disposition\n Number date Make/Model Quantity\n473067-5119 5/3/2005 Cannon 1150 1\n473067-6047-0001 2/16/2006 Xerox 230DC 14\n473067-6047-0001 2/16/2006 Xerox 220DC 1\n473067-6348 12/15/2006 Xerox 220DC 1\n473067-6356 1/8/2007 Xerox 220DC 1\n883101-8212-0080 7/25/2008 Cannon IR400S 1\n Total 19\n\n\n Page 10\n National Archives and Records Administration\n\x0c OIG Audit Report No. 11-07\n\n\nAdditionally, excess property reports were not always filled out properly. In seven\ninstances the photocopier make and/or model information was not documented on the\nform, in two instances the model identified was not a photocopier, and in two instances\nthe make and model were recorded incorrectly and the vendor was not able to locate the\ninformation needed to perform the audit test.\n\nAccording to NARA\xe2\x80\x99s IT Security Methodology for Media Protection Policy version 5.1,\nNARA must sanitize or destroy information system media before disposal or release for\nreuse.\n\nNARA Directive 1608 Protection of Personally Identifiable Information (PII) defines the\nrules to protect PII from unauthorized disclosure and emphasizes the role of NARA users\nin ensuring that the appropriate safeguards are in place to protect all NARA systems\ncontaining PII. This directive applies to PII in any form or format which would cover PII\nresiding on a hard drive or memory of a photocopier. Physical and technical safeguards\nthat must be in place according to this directive include the following listed below.\n\n - Encryption of data on external hard drives and properly protected when being\ntransmitted outside the agency.\n\n- Destruction of materials containing PII by shredding, burning, deleting, or other\nauthorized destruction method that ensures the data or record is unreadable or\nunrecoverable.\n\nWithout proper protocols to identify photocopiers with hard drives and ensuring that\nthose hard drives are properly sanitized prior to disposal, there is the risk that hard drives\ncontaining PII or classified information could have been exposed leaving NARA\nvulnerable.\n\nRecommendation 1\n\nThe Assistant Archivist for Administration should improve the inventory over\nphotocopiers to:\n a) Include all photocopiers across the agency (owned and leased); and\n b) Identify those photocopiers with hard drives, whether they are used for general or\n classified copying, and when they are disposed.\n\nRecommendation 2\n\nThe Assistant Archivist for Administration should assign responsibility to one group to\noversee management, tracking, and disposal of photocopiers.\n\nIn addition, Assistant Archivist for Administration should assign NAA to consolidate the\nacquisition of photocopiers into one or few contracts to ensure better management of\nthem and to potentially reduce costs,\n\n\n Page 11\n National Archives and Records Administration\n\x0c OIG Audit Report No. 11-07\n\n\nRecommendation 3\n\nThe Assistant Archivist for Administration should ensure that documentation of\nphotocopier disposals include accurate information on the make and model and also\nidentify whether the unit had a hard drive. If a hard drive is present, documentation\nshould include the method of sanitization. In addition, this information should be kept in\na central location.\n\nRecommendation 4\n\nThe Assistant Archivist for Administration should implement a policy that photocopier\nacquisitions do not include hard drives unless a valid business case is presented\nspecifying the need to have one.\n\nManagement Response\n\nManagement concurred with the recommendations.\n\n\n\n\n Page 12\n National Archives and Records Administration\n\x0c OIG Audit Report No. 11-07\n\n\n2. There are no policy and procedures describing security\n measures to be taken for general use photocopiers and\n disposal of photocopiers containing a hard drive\nThere are no documented policies describing security measures to be taken for\nphotocopiers utilized for general use, nor are there procedures to ensure that photocopier\nhard drives are sanitized or destroyed prior to disposal or at the end of the lease term.\nManagement has not developed policies and procedures in these areas because\naccountability for this area has not been assigned to any office. In addition, security\nconcerns over photocopier hard drives have recently emerged and management had not\nmade this a priority. Furthermore, NARA has focused on ensuring photocopier contract\nlanguage is updated rather than ensuring day to day procedures for photocopier use are\ncreated and implemented. The Government Accountability Office (GAO) requires\nmanagers to develop detailed policies and procedures, and to ensure the policies and\nprocedures are an integral part of agency operations. In addition, the Privacy Act\nrequires each agency to establish administrative and technical safeguards to insure the\nsecurity and confidentiality of records and to protect against any anticipated threats.\nLack of effective policies and procedures increase the risk that photocopier hard drives\nare not adequately secured and safeguarded and increase the risk of exposure of PII or\nclassified information.\n\nThere are no documented procedures or policies in place for photocopiers for general use.\nNARA does have a policy containing guidelines for copying classified information which\nprovides guidance including security measures for photocopiers used for the reproduction\nof classified material. However, no guidance has been developed for photocopiers used\nfor general use. Thus, there is no restriction on copying items containing sensitive\ninformation such as PII on these photocopiers. Most Human Resources forms, initial\ntravel forms, and background investigation forms contain a social security number and\nother PII information. Many times these forms are photocopied on a general use\nphotocopier prior to submission to the appropriate department. Additionally, the\nreceiving departments also make copies of these documents using a general use\nphotocopier.\n\n NARA also has guidance addressing the disposal of personal property and the disposal\nof hard drives regardless of the source. However, there are no procedures specifically\naddressing how to (1) dispose of photocopiers, (2) remove the hard drives, or (3)\nensure that photocopier hard drives are sanitized or destroyed prior to disposal or at the\nend of the lease term. As a result, confusion exists regarding what to do when a\nphotocopier is ready for disposal. We interviewed several employees who stated that they\nwere unsure of what to do with photocopiers at the end of their useful life. For example\none employee in NAF stated that there were 2 copiers in the warehouse "cage" ready to\nbe excessed and he was not sure if there were hard drives in them. In addition, he was not\nsure how to retrieve the hard drive, what to do with it if there was one, and who was\nresponsible for destroying the hard drive. In another example, an employee in the Center\nfor Legislative Archives (NWL) was not sure how to dispose of an old classified\n Page 13\n National Archives and Records Administration\n\x0c OIG Audit Report No. 11-07\n\n\nphotocopier properly. There is no guidance to direct NARA employees on how to\nproperly dispose of these items. These examples further validate the need for procedures\nto be documented and communicated to all NARA employees.\n\nWe interviewed the Acting Assistant Archivist of NA and the General Counsel in NGC\nand both agreed that procedures need to be developed in these areas to ensure that the\nproper steps are taken to protect PII, classified, or other sensitive information residing on\nphotocopier hard drives.\n\nGAO\xe2\x80\x99s Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government states, management is\nresponsible for developing the detailed policies, procedures, and practices to fit their\nagency\xe2\x80\x99s operations and to ensure that they are built into and an integral part of\noperations. Information should be recorded and communicated to management and others\nwithin the entity, who need it, and in a form and within a time frame, which enables them\nto carry out their internal control and other responsibilities.\n\nLack of policies and procedures increase the risk that vulnerable assets are not adequately\nsecured and safeguarded and increase the risk of exposure of PII or classified information.\n\nRecommendation 5\n\nThe Assistant Archivist of Administration should create a policy for security measures to\nbe taken for all photocopiers across the agency similar to the policy used for classified\nphotocopiers.\n\nRecommendation 6\n\nThe Assistant Archivist of Administration should create a procedure for the disposal of\nphotocopiers that will dovetail into NH\xe2\x80\x99s Asset Management Team Media Tracking and\nDisposal Plan. The following items should be included in the procedures:\n\n \xe2\x80\xa2 How the photocopier hard drive should be removed or who to contact to get it\n removed;\n \xe2\x80\xa2 Where and how to send the hard drive;\n \xe2\x80\xa2 Evidence should be kept to document when it was removed, where it was sent,\n who received it, when it was destroyed and method of destruction;\n \xe2\x80\xa2 Who maintains responsibility for ensuring this procedure is implemented\n\nThis procedure should be reviewed by NA program offices as well as NH. Finally\nupdated procedures should be posted on-line for easy reference by NARA staff.\n\nManagement Response\n\nManagement concurred with the recommendations.\n\n\n Page 14\n National Archives and Records Administration\n\x0c OIG Audit Report No. 11-07\n\n\n3. Security language missing from photocopier contracts\nPhotocopier lease agreements and contracts do not include a \xe2\x80\x9ckeep disk\xe2\x80\x9d or similar clause\nas required by NARA\xe2\x80\x99s IT Security Methodology for Media Protection Policy version\n5.1. NARA did not comply with its own policy to mitigate the risks posed by potential\nexposure of sensitive information in the event a photocopier is in the possession of a\nvendor or is being replaced, disposed, or turned in after the expiration of the lease term.\nNARA\xe2\x80\x99s IT Security Methodology for Media Protection Policy version 5.1 "Media\nSanitization" states that contracts are required to include a "keep disk" clause or similar\noption in order to protect NARA from the risk of PII contained on hard drives from being\nexposed. While there have been no known security breaches, there is the risk of exposing\nsensitive information to unauthorized individuals.\n\nIn May 2010, NGC began efforts to identify photocopier contracts and agreements across\nthe agency in order to update them to include appropriate security language. According\nto NGC, photocopier contracts (whether they have a hard drive or not) are being modified\nto contain a "keep disk" clause in accordance with section 6 of NARA\'s IT Security\nMethodology for Media Protection Policy version 5.1. NGC developed language for a\n\xe2\x80\x9ckeep disk\xe2\x80\x9d clause to be included in these agreements and contracts. The clause states:\n\n \xe2\x80\x9cIn accordance with NARA policy, NARA will take title to all electronic storage\n devices, including but not limited to hard drives that may contain Personally\n Identifiable Information (PII). NARA will not allow the removal of any electronic\n storage device that may contain PII data from its facilities by a contractor,\n including individuals performing maintenance on equipment, devices or systems.\n This provision applies even in the event the equipment is leased. NARA will\n handle the destruction of this hardware internally. This provision must flow down\n to all subcontracts, including those for maintenance.\n\n If the Vendor comes into possession of an electronic storage device that may\n contain PII, the Vendor will immediately notify the Contracting Officer and return\n the electronic storage device to NARA. Vendor will protect the confidentiality of\n the electronic storage device and will not access, disclose, release, disseminate,\n or publish any of the information on the electronic storage device.\xe2\x80\x9d\n\nNGC identified and is maintaining a list of 79 lease agreements and purchase documents\nobtained from a PRISM 2 search as well as by contacting regional and library offices. As\nof the end of our fieldwork, only 15 of the 79 lease agreements and purchase documents\nhave been modified. This is due to management waiting on vendors to respond to the\nrequest to update the contracts and management not having all pertinent information\nneeded to get contracts updated. Of the 79 lease agreements and purchase documents, 15\nare for photocopiers that do not have hard drives. So this leaves 49 contracts that have yet\nto be modified which leaves the agency at risk for exposure of PII or\n\n2\n PRISM is the automated procurement system. NAA uses this application to administer contract awards\nand maintain purchase information. The application is accessed via the NARANET network.\n Page 15\n National Archives and Records Administration\n\x0c OIG Audit Report No. 11-07\n\n\nclassified information if hard drives remain the property of the vendor. Furthermore, no\naction has been initiated on 26 of the 79 agreements because NGC is not aware of who\nthe contract officer is for most of these agreements. Per conversation with NGC, these\ncontracts may not be active and they would need the assistance of NAA in order to\ndetermine the status and who would be responsible for updating the contract. Since there\nis no tracking of all photocopiers in a central location, management cannot be reasonably\ncertain that they have a complete listing of all photocopier leases and contracts, and\ntherefore cannot be sure all photocopier contracts and lease agreements will be updated.\n\n\nRecommendation 7\n\nThe Assistant Archivist of NA with assistance from the General Counsel should\n\n a) Work with NAA and NAF to get a complete list of all photocopier contracts and\n agreements to ensure all get updated to include the appropriate security language;\n b) Continue to review and update all photocopier agreements and contracts to\n include the proper security clause; and\n c) Work with NAA to determine the status of the 26 agreements and initiate action\n to get them modified if necessary.\n\nManagement Response\n\nManagement concurred with the recommendation.\n\n\n\n\n Page 16\n National Archives and Records Administration\n\x0c OIG Audit Report No. 11-07\n\n\nAppendix A \xe2\x80\x93 Photocopiers With Hard Drives\n\n # Copier Make Serial Number Location Own or Lease\n 1 Xerox WCP35 MYP-002285 Clinton Library Own\n 2 Xerox WCP32/40 KMM-002591 Clinton Library Own\n 3 Xerox CC/WCP35 MYP-002649 Clinton Library Own\n 4 Xerox Bookmark 40 LBD001186N Kennedy Library Own\n 5 KYOCERA KM3060 UYE8600040 Military Record Center Own\n 6 KYOCERA KM3060 UYE8600038 ST Louis Own\n 7 RICOH AFICO 1035G H7720401218 Morrow Own\n 8 KYOCERA KM3050 UPV7300055 Military Record Center Own\n 9 KYOCERA KM3050 UPV7300062 Military Record Center Own\n 10 KYOCERA KM3050 UPV7200034 Military Record Center Own\n 11 KYOCERA KM3050 UPV7300076 Military Record Center Own\n 12 KYOCERA KM3050 UPV7300054 Military Record Center Own\n 13 Panasonic DPC262 DEG44H00028 Eisenhower Library Own\n 14 KYOCERA KM3035 AJK3016350 Military Record Center Own\n 15 KYOCERA KM4035 AJL3016677 Military Record Center Own\n 16 Cannon IR5000 MPL62529 Morrow Lease\n 17 Cannon IR5000 MPL09414 Morrow Lease\n 18 Cannon IR5020 JCT18197 Atlanta Federal Records Center Own\n 19 Cannon IR5020 JCT18112 Atlanta Federal Records Center Own\n 20 Cannon IR3300 MRJ02070 Atlanta Federal Records Center Own\n 21 Cannon IR3300 MRJ03267 Atlanta Federal Records Center Own\n 22 Cannon IR4570 SKU1895 Atlanta Federal Records Center Own\n 23 Ricoh Aficio 1035G H7011200327 Morrow Own\n 24 OCE digital Copier 3165 166061658 Atlanta Federal Records Center Own\n 25 Konica Minolta 500/501, machine 13468 A0R5011004757\xc2\xa0 Philadelphia Lease\n 26 Konica Minolta 200/350, machine 13469; ( 31139718 Philadelphia Lease\n 27 Konica Minolat 200/350, machine 13467; (131139684 Philadelphia Lease\n 28 Canon Image Runner 3300G MRJ02983 Carter Library Own\n 29 Canon Image Runner 3300G MPH66494 Carter Library Own\n 30 Xerox CC232HG URT158166 Carter Library Lease Classified\n 31 Sharp MX-2700N 90000472 Carter Library Lease\n 32 Sharp AR-M620N 4AB00381 Reagan Library Lease\n 33 Konica Minolta CF3102 3129216 Philadelphia Own\n 34 OCE 3165 1660603319 Philadelphia Own\n\n\n\n\n Page 17\n National Archives and Records Administration\n\x0c OIG Audit Report No. 11-07\n\n\nAppendix B - Standard Form 120- Excess Property\nReport\n\n\n\n\n Page 18\n National Archives and Records Administration\n\x0c OIG Audit Report No. 11-07\n\n\nAppendix C - Acronyms and Abbreviations\n\nGAO Government Accountability Office\nNARA National Archives and Records Administration\nOIG Office of Inspector General\nPII Personally Identifiable Information\nNGC Office of General Counsel\nNA Office of Administration\nNAA Acquisition Services Division\nNL Office of Presidential Libraries\nNR Office of Regional Records Services\nNH Office of Information Services\nNHT Information Technology Services Division\nNAF Facilities and Personal Property Management Division\nNWL Center for Legislative Archives\n\n\n\n\n Page 19\n National Archives and Records Administration\n\x0c OIG Audit Report No. 11-07\n\n\nAppendix D - Management\xe2\x80\x99s Response to the Report\n\n\n\n\n Page 20\n National Archives and Records Administration\n\x0c OIG Audit Report No. 11-07\n\n\nAppendix E - Report Distribution List\n\nArchivist of the United States\nDeputy Archivist of the United States\nAssistant Archivist, Office of Administration (NA)\nChief of Staff\nManagement Control Liaison, Policy and Planning (NPOL)\nOffice of General Counsel (NGC)\n\n\n\n\n Page 21\n National Archives and Records Administration\n\x0c'