jurisdiction: US

text: b'OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL\n\n\nAUDIT OF USAID\xe2\x80\x99s\nIMPLEMENTATION OF\nINTERNET PROTOCOL\nVERSION 6\nAUDIT REPORT NO. A-000-08-006-P\nSeptember 4, 2008\n\n\n\n\nWASHINGTON, DC\n\x0cOffice of Inspector General\n\n\nSeptember 4, 2008\n\nMEMORANDUM\n\nTO: Acting Chief Information Officer, Phil Heneghan\n\nFROM: IG/A/ITSA, Director, Melinda Dempsey /s/\n\nSUBJECT: Audit of USAID\xe2\x80\x99s Implementation of Internet Protocol Version 6\n (Audit Report No. A-000-08-006-P)\n\nThis memorandum transmits the Office of Inspector General\xe2\x80\x99s final report on the subject audit.\nThe report contains no recommendations. In finalizing the report, we considered your written\ncomments on our draft report and included those comments in their entirety in appendix II of this\nreport.\n\nI appreciate the cooperation and courtesies extended to my staff during this audit by members\nof your office.\n\n\n\n\nU.S. Agency for International Development\n1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW\nWashington, DC 20523\nwww.usaid.gov\n\x0cCONTENTS\nSummary of Results ....................................................................................................... 1\n\nBackground ..................................................................................................................... 3\n\nAudit Objectives ................................................................................................................ 5\n\nAudit Findings ................................................................................................................. 6\n\nDid USAID develop a complete inventory of existing\nInternet Protocol version 6 compliant devices in\naccordance with Office of Management and Budget\nguidance? ........................................................................................................................ 6\n\nDid USAID complete an analysis to determine the fiscal\nand operational impacts and risks of migrating to Internet\nProtocol version 6 in accordance with Office of\nManagement and Budget Guidance? ............................................................................... 7\n\nEvaluation of Management Comments ......................................................................... 9\n\nAppendix I \xe2\x80\x93 Scope and Methodology .......................................................................... 10\n\nAppendix II \xe2\x80\x93 Management Comments ......................................................................... 12\n\x0cSUMMARY OF RESULTS\nInternet Protocol (IP) addresses are a fundamental part of the Internet. Every device\nconnected to the Internet needs an IP address that is represented by a unique number.\nCurrently, two types of IP addresses are in active use worldwide: IP version 4 (IPv4)\nand IP version 6 (IPv6). IPv4 is the most commonly used version in the United States,\nwith the capacity to support about 4.3 billion unique addresses. IPv6 was developed to\naddress concerns over expected emerging demands for limited IPv4 addresses.\nAlthough differing views exist within the Internet industry as to the pace of demand for\nthe remaining IPv4 addresses, demand for IP addresses is expected to increase as\nmore and more of the world\xe2\x80\x99s population requests Internet access and uses electronic\ndevices that require an IP address. IPv6 is intended to meet this future demand with a\ncapacity to support about 3.4\xc3\x971038 unique addresses. Consequently, use of both IPv4\nand IPv6 is expected to overlap for some time. The hardware and software\ninfrastructure needed to support both IPv4 and IPv6 presents a challenge to the Federal\nGovernment (page 3).\n\nTo guide Federal Government agencies in their transition to IPv6, in August 2005 the\nOffice of Management and Budget (OMB) issued memorandum M-05-22, \xe2\x80\x9cTransition\nPlanning for Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6),\xe2\x80\x9d which outlined a transition strategy for\nagencies to follow and established the goal for all Federal agency backbone 1 networks\nto support IPv6 by June 30, 2008 (page 3).\n\nThe Office of Inspector General, Information Technology and Special Audits Division, in\nWashington, DC, conducted this audit to answer the following questions (page 5):\n\n 1. Did USAID develop a complete inventory of existing Internet Protocol version 6\n compliant devices in accordance with Office of Management and Budget\n guidance?\n\n 2. Did USAID complete an analysis to determine the fiscal and operational impacts\n and risks of migrating to Internet Protocol version 6 in accordance with Office of\n Management and Budget guidance?\n\nUSAID substantially complied with OMB\xe2\x80\x99s memorandum M-05-22 guidance for\ncompleting an inventory of network core requirements (page 6) and for completing its\nimpact analysis of migrating to IPv6 (pages 7\xe2\x80\x938). Furthermore, the Agency plans to\nconduct and complete its testing of IPv6 with external peers at the Federal\nCommunications Commission and the Department of State prior to OMB\xe2\x80\x99s stipulated\nJune 30, 2008, milestone date (page 5). 2 Upon completion of the IPv6 demonstration\n\n1\n Network backbone, similarly denoted as \xe2\x80\x9cbackbone network,\xe2\x80\x9d is defined by the Federal Chief\nInformation Officers Council\xe2\x80\x99s IPv6 Working Group as the set of network transport devices (e.g.,\nrouters, switches) that provide the highest level of traffic aggregation and the highest level of\nhierarchy in the network. Federal agencies must specify device types, number of devices, and\nconnectivity between devices that constitute their operational core backbone network.\n2\n Subsequent to the fieldwork, the Agency notified OMB on June 10, 2008, that it had completed\nits IPv6 demonstration test through the Internet with external peers in March 2008. The OIG did\nnot review the IPv6 demonstration test results.\n\n\n 1\n\x0ctests, the Agency intends to disable IPv6 functionality on its production network\nbackbone but continue testing IPv6 products in a test lab environment (page 8).\n\nThe U.S. Government technical requirements and standards representing IPv6 continue\nto evolve. The National Institute of Standards and Technology is working on its\npublication \xe2\x80\x9cA Profile for IPv6 in the U.S. Government \xe2\x80\x93 Version 1.0, Special Publication\n500-267 (2nd draft)\xe2\x80\x9d and associated proposed testing program to provide the technical\nbasis upon which long-term U.S. Government IPv6 adoption plans and policies can be\nbased. The profile is not intended for near-term uses (e.g., the June 2008 requirements\nin M-05-22) but as a forward-looking strategic plan for 2010 and beyond. Additionally,\nthe profile acknowledges that \xe2\x80\x9cwhile significant commercial implementations have and\ncontinue to emerge, broad vendor product lines are currently at varying levels of maturity\nand completeness. Until there is time for significant market forces to effectively define\nde facto standard levels of completeness and correctness, product testing services are\nlikely needed to ensure the confidence and to protect the investment of early IPv6\nadopters\xe2\x80\x9d (pages 7\xe2\x80\x938).\n\nHowever, the testing services and the standards on which testing would be based have\nnot been finalized. In the absence of an IPv6 compliance testing standard, USAID has\nrelied on vendor representations and its own testing efforts for IPv6 capability. USAID\nhas been identifying and replacing non-IPv6 network backbone equipment as part of its\nmultiyear technology refresh program to replace older equipment (page 8).\n\nThis audit is not making any recommendations at this time. In response to the draft\nreport, USAID has no comments in regard to the report\xe2\x80\x99s findings. USAID\xe2\x80\x99s comments\nare included in their entirety in appendix II of this report (see page 12).\n\n\n\n\n 2\n\x0cBACKGROUND\nInternet Protocol (IP) addresses are a fundamental part of the Internet. Every device\nconnected to the Internet needs an IP address that is represented by a unique number.\nCurrently, two types of IP addresses are in active use worldwide: IP version 4 (IPv4)\nand IP version 6 (IPv6). IPv4 was initially deployed in January 1983 and is still the most\ncommonly used version in the United States. IPv4 addresses, which are based on 32-bit\nnumbers, can support about 4.3 billion unique addresses. Deployment of the IPv6\nprotocol began in 1999. IPv6 was developed to address concerns over expected\nemerging demands for limited IPv4 addresses. IPv6 addresses are based on 128-bit\nnumbers with the capacity to support about 3.4\xc3\x971038 unique addresses. Although\ndiffering views exist within the Internet industry as to the pace of demand for the\nremaining IPv4 addresses, demand for IP addresses is expected to increase as more of\nthe world\xe2\x80\x99s population requests Internet access and uses electronic devices that require\nIP addresses. IPv6 is intended to meet this increased future demand. Consequently,\nuse of both IPv4 and IPv6 is expected to overlap for some time. The hardware and\nsoftware infrastructure needed to support both IPv4 and IPv6 presents a challenge to the\nFederal Government.\n\nTo guide Federal Government agencies in their transition for IPv6, in August 2005 the\nOffice of Management and Budget (OMB) issued memorandum M-05-22, \xe2\x80\x9cTransition\nPlanning for Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6),\xe2\x80\x9d which established the goal for all\nFederal agency backbone 3 networks to support IPv6 by June 30, 2008. OMB\nmemorandum M-05-22 identifies several key milestones and requirements for all Federal\nagencies to follow in support of the June 30, 2008, transition date:\n\n By November 15, 2005\n \xe2\x80\xa2 Identify an IPv6 agency lead.\n \xe2\x80\xa2 Complete an inventory of IP-aware devices in its network\n backbone.\n By February 28, 2006\n \xe2\x80\xa2 Develop a network backbone transition plan for IPv6.\n \xe2\x80\xa2 Complete an IPv6 progress report.\n By June 30, 2006\n \xe2\x80\xa2 Complete an inventory of IP-aware applications and peripherals\n with dependencies on its network backbone.\n \xe2\x80\xa2 Complete an IPv6 transition impact analysis.\n By June 30, 2008\n \xe2\x80\xa2 Complete network backbone transition to IPv6.\n\n\n\n\n3\n Network backbone, similarly denoted as \xe2\x80\x9cbackbone network,\xe2\x80\x9d is defined by the Federal Chief\nInformation Officers Council\xe2\x80\x99s IPv6 Working Group as the set of network transport devices (e.g.,\nrouters, switches) that provide the highest level of traffic aggregation and the highest level of\nhierarchy in the network. Federal agencies must specify device types, number of devices, and\nconnectivity between devices that constitute their operational core backbone network.\n\n\n 3\n\x0cAdditionally, OMB M-05-22 tasked\xe2\x80\x94\n\n \xe2\x80\xa2 The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) to develop a standard\n to address IPv6 compliance for the Federal Government,\n \xe2\x80\xa2 The General Services Administration and Federal Acquisition Regulation Council\n to develop a suitable Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) amendment for use\n by all agencies, and\n \xe2\x80\xa2 The Federal Chief Information Officers Council\xe2\x80\x99s (CIOC) Architecture and\n Infrastructure Committee to develop additional IPv6 transitional guidance for\n Federal agencies.\n\nIn January 2008, NIST issued a second draft for public comment on IPv6 compliance, \xe2\x80\x9cA\nProfile for IPv6 in the U.S. Government \xe2\x80\x93 Version 1.0, Special Publication 500-267.\xe2\x80\x9d\nNIST issued its first draft for public comment in February 2007. The General Services\nAdministration, the Department of Defense, and the National Aeronautics and Space\nAdministration issued a notice of a proposed rule in August 2006, FAR Case 2005-041,\nwhich would require IPv6-capable products to be included in information technology\nprocurements to the maximum extent possible; however, this proposed rule has not\nbeen finalized as of the date of this report. The CIOC has finalized several documents in\nsupport of OMB M-05-22 to assist Federal agencies; these include \xe2\x80\x9cIPv6 Transition\nGuidance,\xe2\x80\x9d issued in February 2006, and \xe2\x80\x9cDemonstration Plan to Support Agency IPv6\nCompliance,\xe2\x80\x9d issued in January 2008.\n\nAccording to the CIOC\xe2\x80\x99s transitional guidance \xe2\x80\x9cDemonstration Plan to Support Agency\nIPv6 Compliance,\xe2\x80\x9d the requirements for June 30, 2008, are for the network backbone\n(i.e., core) only. IPv6 does not actually have to be operationally enabled by June 30,\n2008. However, network backbones must be ready to pass IPv6 traffic and support IPv6\naddresses. Agencies are expected to verify this new capability through testing activities\nand must be able to demonstrate that they can perform at least the following functions,\nwithout compromising IPv4 capability or network security, by June 30, 2008:\n\n \xe2\x80\xa2 Transmit IPv6 traffic from the Internet and external peers, through the network\n backbone (core) to the local area network (LAN).\n \xe2\x80\xa2 Transmit IPv6 traffic from the LAN, through the network backbone (core), out to\n the Internet and external peers.\n \xe2\x80\xa2 Transmit IPv6 traffic from the LAN, through the network backbone (core), to\n another LAN (or another node on the same LAN).\n\nFor these demonstrations, the CIOC defined a LAN as desktop or laptop personal\ncomputers configured to send and receive IPv6 packets and connected to a network\nbackbone with IPv6-enabled networking equipment. External networks can belong to\nanother agency, an Internet service provider, or another organization capable of\ntransmitting IPv6 traffic. The testing of other information technology assets (e.g.,\napplications) is not required for the June deadline.\n\nUSAID plans to conduct and complete its testing of IPv6 on its network backbone with\nthe Federal Communications Commission and the Department of State prior to OMB\xe2\x80\x99s\nstipulated June 30, 2008, deadline.\n\n\n\n\n 4\n\x0cAUDIT OBJECTIVES\nThe Office of Inspector General, Information Technology and Special Audits Division,\nincluded this audit in its fiscal year 2007 audit plan to answer the following questions:\n\n 1. Did USAID develop a complete inventory of existing Internet Protocol version 6\n compliant devices in accordance with Office of Management and Budget\n guidance?\n\n 2. Did USAID complete an analysis to determine the fiscal and operational impacts\n and risks of migrating to Internet Protocol version 6 in accordance with Office of\n Management and Budget guidance?\n\nAppendix I contains a discussion of the audit\xe2\x80\x99s scope and methodology.\n\n\n\n\n 5\n\x0cAUDIT FINDINGS\nDid USAID develop a complete inventory of existing Internet\nProtocol version 6 compliant devices in accordance with Office\nof Management and Budget guidance?\nUSAID substantially complied with the Office of Management and Budget\xe2\x80\x99s (OMB)\nmemorandum M-05-22 to prepare a complete inventory of network backbone devices.\n\nOverall, USAID has been responsive to OMB\xe2\x80\x99s Internet Protocol version 6 (IPv6)\ninventory requirements. The Agency developed an initial inventory of its network\nbackbone in November 2005 and an updated listing in June 2006 that totaled about 715\nitems of equipment. USAID subsequently revised its inventory of IPv6 network\nbackbone equipment in November 2007 as a result of newer guidance issued by the\nFederal Chief Information Officers Council (CIOC) that defined a \xe2\x80\x9cnetwork backbone\xe2\x80\x9d\n(i.e., core network) for use by executive agencies in support of OMB M-05-22. As a\nresult of this definitional clarification, USAID\xe2\x80\x99s inventory was reduced to 24 items of\nequipment, which represented the Agency\xe2\x80\x99s metropolitan area network (MAN) 4 as its\nnetwork backbone. The audit team\xe2\x80\x99s verification of the Agency\xe2\x80\x99s inventory list identified\ntwo more pieces of equipment that were not on the Agency\xe2\x80\x99s inventory of 24 items. The\ntwo additional pieces of equipment were determined to be part of the Agency\xe2\x80\x99s network\nbackbone that provided redundancy to maintain availability. Although two items were\nnot included in the Agency\xe2\x80\x99s list, the omission was not considered material. Agency\nofficials indicated that the two items were added after submitting their inventory listing to\nOMB.\n\n\n\n\n4\n A metropolitan area network (MAN) is a network that interconnects users with computer\nresources in a geographic area or region. The term is applied to the interconnection of networks\nin a city into a larger network.\n\n\n 6\n\x0cDid USAID complete an analysis to determine the fiscal and\noperational impacts and risks of migrating to Internet Protocol\nversion 6 in accordance with Office of Management and Budget\nguidance?\nUSAID substantially complied with OMB\xe2\x80\x99s guidance to complete its analysis of fiscal and\noperational impacts and risks of migrating to Internet Protocol version 6.\n\nOMB memorandum M-05-22 required agencies to complete an IPv6 transition impact\nanalysis by June 30, 2006, with the goal of completing a demonstration test of their\nnetwork backbone for IPv6 by June 30, 2008. The USAID lead person responsible for\nthe Agency\xe2\x80\x99s transition to IPv6 stated that the transition impact analysis for IPv6 was\ncompleted within OMB\xe2\x80\x99s June 30, 2006, milestone date. A copy of USAID\xe2\x80\x99s impact\nanalysis was obtained and reviewed. Based on this review, it was found that USAID\xe2\x80\x94\n\n \xe2\x80\xa2 Completed an IPv6 transition impact analysis as required.\n \xe2\x80\xa2 Identified key concerns and some possible solutions.\n \xe2\x80\xa2 Prepared a cost budget addendum to support the impact analysis.\n\nUSAID\xe2\x80\x99s impact analysis identified risks that included security, investment funding,\nimmature technology, and operational issues for managing an IPv6 network. It also\nprovided mitigating approaches to reduce some of the identified risks. The Agency\nproposed solutions to address some of the risks that were based on assumptions\ndeveloped prior to the June 2006 OMB milestone date. Among the concerns that the\nAgency identified in its impact analysis were the following information security and\ntraining risks:\n\n \xe2\x80\xa2 Information Security \xe2\x80\x93 The new protocol [IPv6] is a significant change in how\n networks transport information. All existing tools, along with relative policies and\n procedures, need to be evaluated to see if they can provide the same\n functionality or if they need to be modified, replaced, or augmented\xe2\x80\xa6and that\n USAID needs to provide the same or greater protection in the IPv6 environment\n as is in place for IPv4.\n \xe2\x80\xa2 Training \xe2\x80\x93 The security operations staff would need training and additional tools\n to be able to identify IPv6 traffic for the types of vulnerabilities they protect\n against now using IPv4. Additionally, the Agency would need to develop a\n training plan for the various operating groups [formerly IRM Operations] within\n the Office of the Chief Information Officer.\n\nThe risks identified in the Agency\xe2\x80\x99s impact analysis are not considered to be urgent\nconcerns that require immediate attention because the Agency\xe2\x80\x99s network has not\ntransitioned to IPv6. However, the concerns are significant issues to be considered\nwhen supporting a network transitioning to IPv6. In its impact analysis, the Agency\nrecognized that some risks could not be addressed based on the technological maturity\nof available products, technical standards, and specifications existing at that time.\n\nAs of May 2008, there still was no immediate urgency for the Agency to adopt IPv6,\nparticularly when IPv6 standards and technical requirements for the U.S. Government\ncontinue to evolve. The U.S. Government, however, continues to make progress in\n\n\n\n 7\n\x0caddressing the IPv6 challenge by developing technical standards, specifications, and\ntesting programs.\n\nFor example, the NIST publication \xe2\x80\x9cA Profile for IPv6 in the U.S. Government \xe2\x80\x93 Version\n1.0, Special Publication 500-267 (2nd draft)\xe2\x80\x9d and its associated proposed testing\nprogram are to provide the technical basis upon which long-term U.S. Government IPv6\nadoption plans and policies can be based. The profile is not intended for near-term uses\n(e.g., the June 2008 requirements described in M-05-22). Instead, as a forward-looking\nstrategic plan, the profile\xe2\x80\x99s recommendations are targeted for 2010 and beyond.\nAdditionally, the NIST publication states that \xe2\x80\x9cwhile significant commercial\nimplementations have and continue to emerge, broad vendor product lines are currently\nat varying levels of maturity and completeness. Until there is time for significant market\nforces to effectively define de facto standard levels of completeness and correctness,\nproduct testing services are likely needed to ensure the confidence and to protect the\ninvestment of early IPv6 adopters.\xe2\x80\x9d\n\nBecause testing services and standards have not been finalized, USAID officials\nindicated that they have relied on vendor representations and the Agency\xe2\x80\x99s own testing\nfor IPv6 capability. USAID has been identifying and replacing non-IPv6 network\nbackbone equipment as part of its multiyear technology refresh program to replace older\nequipment. The Agency plans to disable IPv6 on its production network (i.e., outside a\ntest lab environment) after its IPv6 demonstration test to OMB. 5\n\nHowever, USAID\xe2\x80\x99s management provided comments that the Agency will continue to\ntest products supporting IPv6 and update how it would address identified risks in its\nimpact analysis beyond June 2008 on the basis of research and testing.\n\n\n\n\n5\n Subsequent to the fieldwork, the Agency notified OMB on June 10, 2008, that it had completed\nits IPv6 demonstration test through the Internet with external peers in March 2008. The OIG did\nnot review the IPv6 demonstration test results.\n\n\n 8\n\x0cEVALUATION OF\nMANAGEMENT COMMENTS\nIn its response to the draft report, USAID did not have any comments regarding the\nfindings. USAID\xe2\x80\x99s comments from the Office of the Chief Information Officer are\nincluded in appendix II.\n\n\n\n\n 9\n\x0c APPENDIX I\n\n\n\nSCOPE AND METHODOLOGY\nScope\nThe Office of Inspector General, Information Technology and Special Audits Division,\nperformed this audit to determine whether USAID developed, in accordance with Office\nof Management and Budget (OMB) guidance, (1) a complete inventory of existing\nInternet Protocol version 6 (IPv6) compliant devices and (2) a complete analysis of fiscal\nand operational impacts and risks of migrating to IPv6.\n\nWe conducted this performance audit in accordance with generally accepted\nGovernment auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the\naudit to obtain sufficient, appropriate evidence to provide a reasonable basis for our\nfindings and conclusions based on our audit objectives. We believe the evidence\nobtained provides a reasonable basis for our findings and conclusions based on our\naudit objectives.\n\nAudit fieldwork was conducted between November 2007 and May 2008, primarily at\nUSAID headquarters in Washington, DC; the Tech Hub in Rosslyn, VA; and the\nBeltsville Information Management Center and the Teleport Center in Laurel, MD. The\naudit team met several times with the IPv6 project team lead and USAID technical and\nnetwork experts associated with the project.\n\nIn support of our audit objectives, we evaluated the Agency\xe2\x80\x99s actions and responses to\nOMB memorandum M-05-22 requirements and milestones for transitioning from IPv4 to\nIPv6. Specifically, we evaluated whether the Agency\xe2\x80\x94\n\n By November 15, 2005\n \xe2\x80\xa2 Completed an inventory of IP-aware devices in its network\n backbone.\n By June 30, 2006\n \xe2\x80\xa2 Completed an inventory of IP-aware applications and peripherals\n with dependencies on its network backbone.\n \xe2\x80\xa2 Completed an IPv6 transition impact analysis.\n By June 30, 2008\n \xe2\x80\xa2 Is on target to complete its network backbone transition to IPv6.\n\nThe audit reviewed interpretive documentation issued by the Federal Chief Information\nOfficers Council\xe2\x80\x99s (CIOC) Architecture and Infrastructure\xe2\x80\x99s IPv6 Working Group,\nproposed Federal Acquisition Regulations for IPv6, and the National Institute of\nStandards and Technology\xe2\x80\x99s (NIST) \xe2\x80\x9cA Profile for IPv6 in the U.S. Government \xe2\x80\x93 Version\n1.0, Special Publication 500-267,\xe2\x80\x9d in support of OMB M-05-22. We also obtained and\nreviewed a joint publication issued by NIST and the National Telecommunications and\nInformation Administration, titled \xe2\x80\x9cTechnical and Economic Assessment of Internet\nProtocol Version 6 (IPv6),\xe2\x80\x9d dated January 2006.\n\nWe also included in our scope the control procedures for the disposal and surplus of\nexcess equipment to ensure that any nonvolatile memory or other data storage\n\n\n\n 10\n\x0ccomponent within the Agency\xe2\x80\x99s network backbone was effectively erased upon device\ndisposal or surplus. Additionally, OMB, through guidance issued by the CIOC, required\ndemonstration of IPv6 network backbone compliance for the June 30, 2008, milestone\nby having executive agencies perform specific tests and document the results.\nConsequently, we obtained and reviewed documentation on the IPv6 test procedures\nand applicable test results that were performed in 2007 by USAID engineers and\nsystems contractors to show support for the Agency\xe2\x80\x99s compliance. At the start of this\naudit, the Agency had not yet completed its demonstration tests through the Internet with\nexternal peers; however, the Agency planned to complete these tests prior to June 30,\n2008. Subsequent to our fieldwork, the Agency notified OMB on June 10, 2008, that it\nhad completed its IPv6 demonstration test through the Internet with external peers in\nMarch 2008. We did not review the March 2008 IPv6 test results.\n\nMethodology\nFor the first audit objective, we obtained and reviewed the Agency\xe2\x80\x99s inventory list of\nexisting network backbone devices that represented its metropolitan area network\n(MAN). To determine the accuracy and completeness of the Agency\xe2\x80\x99s network\nbackbone inventory listing, we (1) traced all 24 items on the inventory list to their\nphysical locations and (2) traced equipment items at their physical locations that were\nidentified by Agency engineers as belonging to the network backbone (i.e., MAN) to the\nequipment inventory list. For the purposes of this test, we established a 10 percent\nmateriality threshold, which meant that three or more items identified as deficient would\nbe deemed material.\n\nFor the second audit objective, we obtained a copy of the Agency\xe2\x80\x99s impact analysis to\ndetermine whether it was completed. We interviewed the Agency IPv6 project lead to\nlearn how the analysis was prepared and reviewed, and discussed the strategy for\nmitigating risks and concerns identified in the Agency\xe2\x80\x99s impact analysis. We reviewed\nguidance issued by the CIOC to identify some of the elements that may be considered in\nan agency\xe2\x80\x99s impact analysis for migrating to IPv6. Based on our review of the potential\nelements that could be represented in an impact analysis and the content of the\nAgency\xe2\x80\x99s impact analysis, we subjectively concluded that the analysis was substantially\ncomplete for meeting and addressing risks associated with the June 30, 2008, network\nbackbone demonstration test.\n\n\n\n\n 11\n\x0c APPENDIX II\n\n\n\nMANAGEMENT COMMENTS\n\n\n August 20, 2008\n\n\nMEMORANDUM\n\n\nTO: IG/A/ITSA, Melinda G. Dempsey\n\nFROM: M/CIO, Phil Heneghan /s/\n\nSUBJECT: Draft Audit of USAID\xe2\x80\x99s Implementation of Internet Protocol Version 6 (Audit\nReport No. A-000-08-XXX-P)\n\n\nThank you for the opportunity to comment on the Draft Audit of USAID\xe2\x80\x99s Implementation\nof Internet Protocol Version 6 (Audit Report No. A-000-08-XXX-P)\n\nAfter extensive review, the Office of the Chief Information Officer has no comments on\nthe Findings.\n\nPlease accept my thanks for the cooperation and courtesies extended to my staff duing\nthis audit by members of your office.\n\n\n\n\nCc: Carl Crawford\n Gretchen Larrimer\n\n\n\n\n 12\n\x0cU.S. Agency for International Development\n Office of Inspector General\n 1300 Pennsylvania Ave, NW\n Washington, DC 20523\n Tel: (202) 712-1150\n Fax: (202) 216-3047\n www.usaid.gov/oig\n\x0c'


type: legislation

jurisdiction: EU

text:
 3.9.2014
 DA
 Den Europæiske Unions Tidende
 L 263/10
 KOMMISSIONENS GENNEMFØRELSESFORORDNING (EU) Nr. 939/2014
 af 2. september 2014
 om indførelse af de attester, der er omhandlet i artikel 5 og 14 i Europa-Parlamentets og Rådets forordning (EU) nr. 606/2013 af 12. juni 2013 om gensidig anerkendelse af beskyttelsesforanstaltninger i civilretlige spørgsmål
 EUROPA-KOMMISSIONEN HAR —
 under henvisning til traktaten om Den Europæiske Unions funktionsmåde,
 under henvisning til Europa-Parlamentets og Rådets forordning (EU) nr. 606/2013 af 12. juni 2013 om gensidig anerkendelse af beskyttelsesforanstaltninger i civilretlige spørgsmål (1), særlig artikel 19, og
 ud fra følgende betragtninger:
 (1)
 For at forordning (EU) nr. 606/2013 kan anvendes korrekt, bør der udarbejdes to attester.
 (2)
 Det Forenede Kongerige og Irland er bundet af forordning (EU) nr. 606/2013 og er derfor bundet af nærværende forordning.
 (3)
 Danmark er ikke bundet af forordning (EU) nr. 606/2013 og er derfor ikke bundet af nærværende forordning.
 (4)
 Foranstaltningerne i denne forordning er i overensstemmelse med udtalelsen fra Udvalget om Gensidig Anerkendelse af Beskyttelsesforanstaltninger i Civilretlige Spørgsmål, der er nedsat ved forordning (EF) nr. 606/2013 —
 VEDTAGET DENNE FORORDNING:
 Artikel 1
 1. Den formular, der skal anvendes til ansøgning om en attest omhandlet i artikel 5 i forordning (EU) nr. 606/2013, skal være som formular I i bilag I.
 2. Den formular, der skal anvendes til ansøgning om en attest omhandlet i artikel 14 i forordning (EU) nr. 606/2013, skal være som formular II i bilag II.
 Artikel 2
 Denne forordning træder i kraft den 11. januar 2015.
 Denne forordning er bindende i alle enkeltheder og gælder umiddelbart i medlemsstaterne i overensstemmelse med traktaterne.
 Udfærdiget i Bruxelles, den 2. september 2014.
 På Kommissionens vegne
 José Manuel BARROSO
 Formand
 (1) EUT L 181 af 29.6.2013, s. 4.
 BILAG I
 BILAG II


type: wikipedia

text:
A Moeda Viva é uma revista lançada no ano de 2007 com mais de 9.000 exemplares, rapidamente se tornou referência em seu segmento. Com editorial inovador, a Moeda Viva e voltada a empresas que atuam nas áreas financeiras, entre elas, Bancos, Financeiras, Administradoras de Cartão de Crédito, recuperação de crédito, informações cadastrais e fraude.
 Ligações externas
 Página do Grupo AllCheck
 Página da Revista Moeda Viva
 Página da TV Moeda Viva
 Moeda Viva


type: contracts

text:
 Avis juridique important
 |
 21993A0715(01)
 Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters concerning the provisional application of the Protocol establishing, for the period 1 June 1993 to 31 May 1996, the fishing rights and financial compensation provided for in the Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Government of the Democratic Republic of São Tomé e Principe on fishing off São Tomé e Principe
 Official Journal L 172 , 15/07/1993 P. 0026 - 0026
 AGREEMENT in the form of an Exchange of Letters concerning the provisional application of the Protocol establishing, for the period 1 June 1993 to 31 May 1996, the fishing rights and financial compensation provided for in the Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Government of the Democratic Republic of São Tomé e Principe on fishing off São Tomé e PrincipeA. Letter from the Government of the Democratic Republic of São Tomé e Principe Sir,With reference to the Protocol initialled on 10 February 1993 establishing fishing rights and financial compensation for the period 1 June 1993 to 31 May 1996, I have the honour to inform you that the Government of the Democratic Republic of São Tomé e Principe is ready to apply this Protocol on a provisional basis, with effect from 1 June 1993, pending its entry into force in accordance with Article 7 of the said Protocol, provided that the European Economic Community is prepared to do the same.This is on the understanding that a first instalment equal to one third of the financial compensation specified in Article 2 of the Protocol is paid by 31 October 1993.I should be obliged if you would confirm the European Economic Community's agreement to such provisional application.Please accept, Sir, the assurance of my highest consideration.For the Government of the Democratic Republic of São Tomé e PrincipeB. Letter from the European Economic Community Sir,I have the honour to acknowledge receipt of your letter of today's date, which reads as follows:'With reference to the Protocol initialled on 10 February 1993 establishing fishing rights and financial compensation for the period 1 June 1993 to 31 May 1996, I have the honour to inform you that the Government of the Democratic Republic of São Tomé e Principe is ready to apply this Protocol on a provisional basis, with effect from 1 June 1993, pending its entry into force in accordance with Article 7 of the said Protocol, provided that the European Economic Community is prepared to do the same.This is on the understanding that a first instalment equal to one third of the financial compensation specified in Article 2 of the Protocol is paid by 31 October 1993.I should be obliged if you would confirm the European Economic Community's agreement to such provisional application.`I have the honour to confirm the European Economic Community's agreement to this provisional application of the Protocol.Please accept, Sir, the assurance of my highest consideration.On behalf of the Council of the European Communities


text:
 31.7.2010
 SK
 Úradný vestník Európskej únie
 L 200/38
 Právny účinok podľa medzinárodného práva verejného majú iba originálne texty EHK OSN. Status tohto predpisu a dátum nadobudnutia jeho platnosti je potrebné overiť v poslednom znení dokumentu EHK OSN o statuse TRANS/WP.29/343, ktorý je k dispozícii na internetovej stránke:
 http://www.unece.org/trans/main/wp29/wp29wgs/wp29gen/wp29fdocstts.html
 Predpis č. 125 Európskej hospodárskej Komisie Organizácie Spojených národov (EHK OSN) – Jednotné ustanovenia pre schvaľovanie svetlometov motorových vozidiel, pokiaľ ide o výhľad vodiča motorového vozidla smerom dopredu
 Obsahuje celý platný text vrátane:
 doplnku 1 k pôvodnému zneniu predpisu – dátum nadobudnutia platnosti: 3. februára 2008,
 doplnku 2 k pôvodnému zneniu predpisu – dátum nadobudnutia platnosti: 19. augusta 2010.
 OBSAH
 PREDPIS
 1.
 Rozsah platnosti
 2.
 Vymedzenie pojmov
 3.
 Žiadosti o schválenie
 4.
 Schválenie
 5.
 Špecifikácie
 6.
 Skúšobný postup
 7.
 Zmena a rozšírenie schválenia typu vozidla
 8.
 Zhoda výroby
 9.
 Sankcie za nedodržanie zhody výroby
 10.
 Definitívne zastavenie výroby
 11.
 Názvy a adresy technických služieb zodpovedných za vykonávanie schvaľovacích skúšok a názvy a adresy správnych orgánov
 PRÍLOHY
 Príloha 1 –
 Oznámenie týkajúce sa udelenia alebo rozšírenia alebo zamietnutia alebo odňatia typového schválenia alebo definitívneho zastavenia výroby typu vozidla pokiaľ ide o výhľad vodiča motorového vozidla smerom dopredu podľa predpisu č. 125
 Príloha 2 –
 Usporiadania schvaľovacích značiek
 Príloha 3 –
 Postup určenia bodu H a skutočný uhol trupu pre polohy sedenia v motorových vozidlách
 Príloha 4 –
 Metóda stanovenia rozmerového vzťahu medzi základnými vzťažnými značkami vozidla a trojrozmernou referenčnou sieťou
 1 ROZSAH PLATNOSTI
 1.1.
 Tento predpis platí pre výhľad vodiča vozidiel kategórie M1 v rozsahu 180° dopredu (1).
 1.2.
 Jeho účelom je zabezpečiť dostatočný výhľad, ak sú predné okno a ostatné zasklené povrchy suché a čisté.
 1.3.
 Požiadavky tohto predpisu sú formulované tak, aby platili pre vozidlá kategórie M1, v ktorých vodič sedí vľavo. U vozidiel kategórie M1, v ktorých vodič sedí vpravo, platia tieto požiadavky inverzne tam, kde je to vhodné.
 2. VYMEDZENIE POJMOV
 Na účely tohto predpisu:
 2.1.
 „schválenie typu vozidla“ znamená kompletný postup, ktorým zmluvná strana dohody potvrdí, že typ vozidla spĺňa technické požiadavky tohto predpisu;
 2.2.
 „typ vozidla vzhľadom na výhľad“ znamená vozidlá, ktoré sa neodlišujú v týchto podstatných rysoch, ako sú:
 2.2.1.
 vonkajšie a vnútorné tvary a usporiadanie vo vnútri oblasti špecifikovanej v bode 1, ktoré môžu ovplyvniť viditeľnosť, a
 2.2.2.
 tvar a rozmery predného okna a jeho montáž;
 2.3.
 „trojrozmerná referenčná sieť“ znamená referenčný systém skladajúci sa z vertikálnej pozdĺžnej roviny X-Z, horizontálnej roviny X-Y a vertikálnej priečnej roviny Y-Z (pozri doplnok k prílohe 4, obrázok 6); sieť sa používa na stanovenie rozmerového vzťahu medzi polohou konštrukčných bodov na výkresoch a ich polohou na skutočnom vozidle. Postup umiestnenia vozidla vzhľadom k sieti je špecifikovaný v prílohe 4; všetky súradnice vzťahujúce sa na základnú nulovú polohu sa stanovujú pre vozidlo v pohotovostnom stave (2) s jedným cestujúcim na prednom sedadle, pričom hmotnosť cestujúceho je 75 kg ± 1 %.
 2.3.1.
 Vozidlá vybavené zavesením náprav, ktoré umožňuje nastavovať svetlú výšku nad vozovkou, sa skúšajú za normálnych podmienok použitia špecifikovaných výrobcom vozidla;
 2.4.
 „základné referenčné značky“ znamenajú otvory, plochy, značky a identifikačné znaky na karosérii vozidla. Typ použitej referenčnej značky a poloha každej značky vzhľadom k osiam X, Y a Z trojrozmernej referenčnej siete a k základnej konštrukčnej rovine, špecifikuje výrobca vozidla. Týmito značkami môžu byť kontrolné body používané na montáž karosérie;
 2.5.
 „uhol operadla sedadla“ znamená uhol podľa bodu 2.6 alebo 2.7 prílohy 3;
 2.6.
 „skutočný uhol operadla sedadla“ znamená uhol podľa bodu 2.6 prílohy 3;
 2.7.
 „konštrukčný uhol operadla sedadla“ znamená uhol podľa bodu 2.7 prílohy 3;
 2.8.
 „body V“ znamenajú body, ktorých poloha v priestore pre cestujúcich je určovaná ako funkcia vertikálnych pozdĺžnych rovín prechádzajúcich stredmi určených najkrajnejších konštrukčných polôh sedenia na prednom sedadle a vo vzťahu k bodu „R“ a konštrukčnému uhlu operadla sedadla, tieto body sa používajú na overenie zhody s požiadavkami na výhľad vodiča;
 2.9.
 „bod R alebo referenčný bod sedenia“ znamená bod podľa bodu 2.4 prílohy 3;
 2.10.
 „bod H“ znamená bod podľa bodu 2.3 prílohy 3;
 2.11.
 „základné body predného okna“ znamenajú body nachádzajúce sa v priesečníku priamok, ktoré vychádzajú z bodov V smerom dopredu k vonkajšiemu povrchu predného okna, s predným oknom;
 2.12.
 „obrnené vozidlo“ znamená vozidlo určené na ochranu prepravovaných cestujúcich a/alebo tovaru a spĺňajúce požiadavky na nepriestrelnosť;
 2.13.
 „priehľadná plocha“ znamená plochu predného okna alebo iného zaskleného povrchu vozidla, ktorých prestup svetla, meraný kolmo k povrchu, nie je menší než 70 %. V prípade obrnených vozidiel nie je faktor prestupu svetla menší ako 60 %;
 2.14.
 „body P“ znamenajú body, okolo ktorých sa otáča hlava vodiča pri pozorovaní predmetov na horizontálnej rovine na úrovni očí;
 2.15.
 „body E“ znamenajú body predstavujúce stredy očí vodiča a používajú sa na stanovenie rozsahu, v akom stĺpiky A zakrývajú výhľad;
 2.16.
 „stĺpik A“ znamená akúkoľvek podperu strechy pred vertikálnou priečnou rovinou, umiestnenou 68 mm dopredu od bodov V a zahŕňajúcu nepriehľadné predmety, ako obruby predného okna a rámy dverí, pripevnené alebo priliehajúce k takejto podpere;
 2.17.
 „rozsah horizontálneho nastavenia sedadla“ znamená rozsah normálnych jazdných polôh, určený výrobcom na nastavenie sedadla vodiča v smere osi X (pozri bod 2.3);
 2.18.
 „rozšírený rozsah nastavenia sedadla“ znamená výrobcom vozidla stanovený rozsah nastavenia sedadla v smere osi X (pozri bod 2.3), nad rozsah normálnych jazdných polôh uvedených v bode 2.16 a používaný k premene sedadiel na lôžka alebo k uľahčeniu vstupu do vozidla.
 3. ŽIADOSŤ O SCHVÁLENIE
 3.1.
 Žiadosť o schválenie typu vozidla, pokiaľ ide o výhľad vodiča, predkladá výrobca vozidla alebo ním splnomocnený zástupca.
 3.2.
 K žiadosti sú pripojené dokumenty uvedené ďalej v texte v troch vyhotoveniach a s týmito konkrétnymi údajmi:
 3.2.1.
 opisom vozidla vzhľadom na položky uvedené v bode 2.2, spolu s rozmerovými výkresmi a buď fotografiou, alebo rozloženým pohľadom na priestor pre cestujúcich. Je potrebné špecifikovať čísla a/alebo symboly identifikujúce typ vozidla a
 3.2.2.
 dostatočne podrobnými údajmi o základných referenčných značkách tak, aby bolo možné tieto značky ľahko identifikovať a overiť polohu každej z nich vzhľadom k ostatným a vzhľadom k bodu „R“.
 3.3.
 Technickej službe zodpovednej za vykonanie schvaľovacích skúšok sa predkladá vozidlo, ktoré reprezentuje typ vozidla, ktorý má byť schválený.
 4. SCHVÁLENIE
 4.1.
 Ak typ vozidla predložený na schválenie podľa tohto predpisu spĺňa požiadavky bodu 5, schválenie daného typu vozidla sa udelí.
 4.2.
 Každému schválenému typu sa pridelí schvaľovacie číslo; prvé dve číslice (00 pre predpis v jeho pôvodnej forme) uvádzajú rad zmien, ktorými sa zapracúvajú posledné najdôležitejšie technické zmeny predpisu v čase udelenia schválenia. Tá istá zmluvná strana nepridelí to isté číslo rovnakému typu vozidla vybavenému iným typom výhľadu alebo inému typu vozidla.
 4.3.
 Správa o udelení schválenia alebo zamietnutí či odňatí schválenia podľa tohto predpisu sa oznámi stranám dohody, ktoré uplatňujú tento predpis, prostredníctvom formulára v súlade so vzorom uvedeným v prílohe 1 spolu s fotografiami a/alebo plánmi, ktoré dodal žiadateľ, vo formáte nepresahujúcom A4 (210 × 297 mm) alebo zmenšenom do tohto formátu v primeranom meradle.
 4.4.
 Na každé vozidlo zodpovedajúce typu vozidla schválenému podľa tohto predpisu sa zreteľne a na ľahko dostupnom mieste špecifikovanom v schvaľovacom formulári upevní medzinárodná schvaľovacia značka v súlade so vzorom uvedeným v prílohe 2, ktorá pozostáva:
 4.4.1
 z kruhu obklopujúceho písmeno „E“, za ktorým nasleduje rozlišovacie číslo krajiny, ktorá schválenie udelila (3);
 4.4.2.
 z čísla tohto predpisu, po ktorom nasleduje písmeno „R“, pomlčka a schvaľovacie číslo vpravo od kruhu uvedeného v bode 4.4.1.
 4.5.
 Ak vozidlo zodpovedá typu vozidla schválenému podľa jedného alebo viacerých iných predpisov pripojených k tejto dohode, v krajine, ktorá udelila schválenie podľa tohto predpisu, sa symbol uvedený v bode 4.4.1 nemusí opakovať; v takomto prípade sa čísla predpisov, schvaľovacie čísla a doplňujúce symboly umiestnia do stĺpcov vpravo od symbolu uvedeného v bode 4.4.1.
 4.6.
 Schvaľovacia značka musí byť zreteľne čitateľná a nezmazateľná.
 4.7.
 Schvaľovacia značka sa umiestni pri štítku alebo na štítku s údajmi o vozidle.
 5. ŠPECIFIKÁCIE
 5.1. Výhľad vodiča
 5.1.1.
 Priehľadná plocha predného okna musí zahŕňať aspoň údajové body predného okna (pozri doplnok k prílohe 4, obrázok 1):
 5.1.1.1.
 horizontálny údajový bod pred bodom V1 a 17° vľavo (pozri doplnok k prílohe 4, obrázok 1);
 5.1.1.2.
 horný vertikálny údajový bod pred bodom V1 a 7° nad horizontálou;
 5.1.1.3.
 dolný vertikálny údajový bod pred bodom V2 a 5° pod horizontálou;
 5.1.1.4.
 na overenie splnenia požiadavky výhľadu dopredu na druhej polovici predného okna sa stanovia tri dodatočné údajové body, súmerné s bodmi definovanými v bodoch 5.1.1.1 až 5.1.1.3 vzhľadom k pozdĺžnej rovine súmernosti vozidla.
 5.1.2.
 Uhol zakrytia výhľadu každým stĺpikom „A“ podľa bodu 5.1.2.1. nepresiahne 6° (pozri doplnok k prílohe 4, obrázok 3). V prípade obrnených vozidiel tento uhol nepresiahne 10°.
 Uhol zakrytia výhľadu stĺpikom „A“ na strane spolujazdca podľa bodu 5.1.2.1.2 nemusí byť stanovený, ak sú oba stĺpiky umiestnené súmerne vzhľadom k strednej pozdĺžnej vertikálnej rovine vozidla.
 5.1.2.1.
 Uhol zakrytia výhľadu každým stĺpikom „A“ sa meria v horizontálnej rovine, do ktorej sa premietnu tieto dva horizontálne rezy:
 Rez 1
 :
 Z bodu Pm, umiestneného v polohe definovanej v bode 5.3.1.1, viesť smerom dopredu rovinu odklonenú 2° nahor od horizontálnej roviny prechádzajúcej bodom Pm. Stanoviť horizontálny rez stĺpika „A“ z najprednejšieho bodu priesečníka stĺpika „A“ a odklonenej roviny (pozri prílohu 4, doplnok, obrázok 2).
 Rez 2
 :
 Opakovať rovnaký postup, ale s rovinou odklonenou 5° nadol od horizontálnej roviny prechádzajúcej bodom Pm smerom dopredu (pozri doplnok k prílohe 4, obrázok 2).
 5.1.2.1.1.
 Uhol zakrytia výhľadu stĺpikom „A“ na strane vodiča je uhol tvorený v pôdoryse rovnobežkou vedenou z bodu E2 k dotyčnici spájajúcej E1 s vonkajšou hranou rezu S2 a dotyčnicou spájajúcou E2 s vnútornou hranou rezu S1 (pozri doplnok k prílohe 4, obrázok 3).
 5.1.2.1.2.
 Uhol zakrytia výhľadu stĺpikom „A“ na strane spolujazdca je uhol tvorený v pôdoryse dotyčnicou vedenou z bodu E3 k vnútornej hrane rezu S1 a rovnobežkou vedenou z bodu E3 k dotyčnici z bodu E4 k vonkajšej hrane rezu S2 (pozri doplnok k prílohe 4, obrázok 3).
 5.1.2.2.
 Žiadne vozidlo nesmie mať viac ako dva stĺpiky A.
 5.1.3.
 Okrem prekážok tvorených stĺpikmi „A“, pevnými alebo pohyblivými vetracími okienkami alebo deliacimi priečkami bočných okien, vonkajšími rádiovými anténami, spätnými zrkadlami a stieračmi predného okna nesmú byť žiadne prekážky v ploche priameho výhľadu vodiča smerom dopredu v rozsahu 180° pod horizontálnou rovinou prechádzajúcou bodom V1 a nad tromi rovinami prechádzajúcimi bodom V2, z ktorých jedna je kolmá na rovinu X-Z a naklonená dopredu 4° pod horizontálu a ostatné dve kolmé na rovinu Y-Z a naklonené 4° pod horizontálu (pozri doplnok k prílohe 4, obrázok 4).
 Nasledujúce predmety sa nepovažujú za prekážky plochy výhľadu:
 a)
 zapustené alebo plošné vodiče „rádiových antén“, ktoré nie sú širšie ako nasledujúce hodnoty:
 i)
 zapustené vodiče: 0,5 mm;
 ii)
 plošné vodiče: 1,0 mm. Tieto vodiče „rádiových antén“ nesmú prechádzať cez plochu A (4). Plochou A však môžu prechádzať tri vodiče „rádiových antén“, pokiaľ ich šírka nepresahuje 0,5 mm;
 b)
 vo vnútri plochy A umiestnené vodiče na „odmrazovanie/odhmlievanie“, ktoré bežne prechádzajú v „kľukatej“ alebo sínusovej forme a majú tieto rozmery:
 i)
 najväčšia viditeľná šírka: 0,030 mm;
 ii)
 najväčšia hustota vodičov:
 a)
 ak sú vodiče vertikálne: 8/cm;
 b)
 ak sú vodiče horizontálne: 5/cm.
 5.1.3.1.
 Toleruje sa zakrývanie vencom volantu a prístrojovou doskou vo vnútri obrysu volantu, ak rovina prechádzajúca bodom V2, kolmá na rovinu X-Z a dotýkajúca sa najvyššie položenej časti venca volantu, je naklonená najmenej 1° pod horizontálu.
 Volant, ak je nastaviteľný, musí byť umiestnený v normálnej polohe, ktorú určí výrobca, alebo, ak táto nie je určená, nastaví sa do strednej polohy medzi hranicou(-ami) rozsahu nastavenia.
 5.2. Poloha bodov V
 5.2.1.
 Poloha bodov V vzhľadom k bodu „R“, ako uvádzajú osi XYZ trojrozmernej referenčnej siete, je uvedená v tabuľkách I a IV.
 5.2.2.
 Tabuľka I uvádza základné súradnice pre konštrukčný uhol operadla sedadla 25°. Kladný smer osí je vyznačený v doplnku k prílohe 4, obrázok 1.
 Tabuľka I
 Bod V
 X
 Y
 Z
 V1
 68 mm
 –5 mm
 665 mm
 V2
 68 mm
 –5 mm
 589 mm
 5.3. Poloha bodov P
 5.3.1.
 Poloha bodov P vzhľadom k bodu „R“, ako uvádzajú osi XYZ trojrozmernej referenčnej siete, je uvedená v tabuľkách II, III a IV.
 5.3.1.1.
 Tabuľka II uvádza základné súradnice pre konštrukčný uhol operadla sedadla 25°. Kladný smer osí je vyznačený v doplnku k prílohe 4, obrázok 1.
 Bod Pm je priesečník medzi priamkou P1, P2 a pozdĺžnou vertikálnou rovinou prechádzajúcou bodom „R“.
 Tabuľka II
 Bod P
 X
 Y
 Z
 P1
 35 mm
 –20 mm
 627 mm
 P2
 63 mm
 47 mm
 627 mm
 Pm
 43,36 mm
 0 mm
 627 mm
 5.3.1.2.
 Tabuľka III uvádza hodnoty, o ktoré sa majú dodatočne opraviť súradnice X bodov P1 a P2, ak rozsah horizontálneho nastavenia sedadla podľa bodu 2.16 presiahne 108 mm. Kladný smer osí je vyznačený v doplnku k prílohe 4, obrázok 1.
 Tabuľka III
 Rozsah horizontálneho nastavenia sedadla
 Δx
 108 až 120 mm
 –13 mm
 121 až 132 mm
 –22 mm
 133 až 145 mm
 –32 mm
 146 až 158 mm
 –42 mm
 viac ako 158 mm
 –48 mm
 5.4. Korekcia na iné uhly sklonu operadla sedadla než 25°
 Tabuľka IV uvádza ďalšie korekcie, ktoré je potrebné vykonať pri súradniciach X a Z každého bodu P a každého bodu V, keď konštrukčný uhol operadla sedadla nie je 25°. Kladný smer osí je vyznačený v doplnku k prílohe 4, obrázok 1.
 Tabuľka IV
 Uhol operadla sedadla
 (v °)
 Horizontálne súradnice
 Δx
 Vertikálne súradnice
 Δz
 5
 – 186 mm
 28 mm
 6
 – 177 mm
 27 mm
 7
 – 167 mm
 27 mm
 8
 – 157 mm
 27 mm
 9
 – 147 mm
 26 mm
 10
 – 137 mm
 25 mm
 11
 – 128 mm
 24 mm
 12
 – 118 mm
 23 mm
 13
 – 109 mm
 22 mm
 14
 –99 mm
 21 mm
 15
 –90 mm
 20 mm
 16
 –81 mm
 18 mm
 17
 –72 mm
 17 mm
 18
 –62 mm
 15 mm
 19
 –53 mm
 13 mm
 20
 –44 mm
 11 mm
 21
 –35 mm
 9 mm
 22
 –26 mm
 7 mm
 23
 –18 mm
 5 mm
 24
 –9 mm
 3 mm
 25
 0 mm
 0 mm
 26
 9 mm
 –3 mm
 27
 17 mm
 –5 mm
 28
 26 mm
 –8 mm
 29
 34 mm
 –11 mm
 30
 43 mm
 –14 mm
 31
 51 mm
 –18 mm
 32
 59 mm
 –21 mm
 33
 67 mm
 –24 mm
 34
 76 mm
 –28 mm
 35
 84 mm
 –32 mm
 36
 92 mm
 –35 mm
 37
 100 mm
 –39 mm
 38
 108 mm
 –43 mm
 39
 115 mm
 –48 mm
 40
 123 mm
 –52 mm
 5.5. Poloha bodov E
 5.5.1.
 Každý z bodov E1 a E2 je od bodu P1 vzdialený 104 mm.
 E2 je vzdialený 65 mm od bodu E1 (pozri doplnok k prílohe 4, obrázok 4).
 5.5.2.
 Priamka spájajúca body E1 a E2 sa otáča okolo bodu P1, až kým dotyčnica spájajúca E1 s vonkajšou hranou rezu 2 stĺpika „A“ na strane vodiča nie je kolmá na priamku E1 – E2 (pozri dplnok k prílohe 4, obrázok 3).
 5.5.3.
 Každý z bodov E3 a E4 je od bodu P2 vzdialený 104 mm. E3 je 65 mm od E4 (pozri doplnok k prílohe 4, obrázok 4).
 5.5.4.
 Priamka spájajúca body E3 - E4 sa otáča okolo bodu P2, až kým dotyčnica spájajúca bod E4 s vonkajšou hranou rezu 2 stĺpika „A“ na strane spolujazdca nie je kolmá na priamku E3 – E4 (pozri doplnok k prílohe 4, obrázok 3).
 6. SKÚŠOBNÝ POSTUP
 6.1. Výhľad vodiča
 6.1.1.
 Rozmerový vzťah medzi základnými referenčnými značkami vozidla a trojrozmernou referenčnou sieťou sa stanoví postupom predpísaným v prílohe 4.
 6.1.2.
 Poloha bodov V1 a V2 sa stanovuje vo vzťahu k bodu „R“ podľa údajov súradníc XYZ trojrozmernej referenčnej siete uvedených v tabuľke I v bode 5.2.2 a v tabuľke IV v bode 5.4. Údajové body predného okna sa potom zistia z korigovaných polôh bodov V, ako je predpísané v bode 5.1.1.
 6.1.3.
 Vzťah medzi bodmi P, bodom „R“ a strednicou miesta sedenia vodiča, uvádzaný súradnicami XYZ trojrozmernej referenčnej siete, sa stanoví podľa tabuliek II a III v bode 5.3. Korekcia pre konštrukčné uhly operadla sedadla iné ako 25° sú uvedené v tabuľke IV v bode 5.4.
 6.1.4.
 Uhol zakrytia výhľadu (pozri bod 5.1.2) sa meria v rovinách odklonených podľa doplnku k prílohe IV, obrázok 2. Vzťah medzi bodmi P1 a P2, ktoré sú spojené s bodmi E1 a E2, resp. E3 a E4, je znázornený v doplnku k prílohe 4, obrázok 5.
 6.1.4.1.
 Priamka spájajúca body E1 – E2 sa nastaví podľa bodu 5.5.2. Uhol zakrytia výhľadu stĺpikom A na strane vodiča sa meria podľa bodu 5.1.2.1.1.
 6.1.4.2.
 Priamka E3 – E4 sa nastaví podľa bodu 5.5.4. Uhol zakrytia výhľadu stĺpikom A na strane spolujazdca sa potom meria podľa bodu 5.1.2.1.2.
 6.1.5
 Výrobca môže merať uhol zakrytia buď na vozidle, alebo na výkrese. V prípade pochybností môže technická služba požadovať vykonanie skúšok na vozidle.
 7. ZMENA A ROZŠÍRENIE SCHVÁLENIA TYPU VOZIDLA
 7.1.
 Každá zmena typu vozidla podľa bodu 2.2 sa oznamuje správnym oddeleniam, ktoré udelili schválenie typu vozidla. Oddelenie potom môže buď:
 7.1.1.
 skonštatovať, že vykonané zmeny nemajú nepriaznivý účinok na podmienky udelenia schválenia, a udeliť rozšírenie schválenia alebo
 7.1.2.
 skonštatovať, že vykonané zmeny vplývajú na podmienky udelenia schválenia a požadovať ďalšie skúšky alebo dodatočné kontroly pred udelením rozšírenia schválenia.
 7.2.
 Potvrdenie alebo odmietnutie schválenia sa s uvedením zmien oznámi zmluvným stranám dohody, ktoré uplatňujú toto rozhodnutie, podľa postupu uvedeného v bode 4.3.
 7.3.
 Príslušný orgán informuje ostatné zmluvné strany o rozšírení prostredníctvom formulára oznámenia, ktorý je uvedený v prílohe 2 k tomuto predpisu. Pridelí sériové číslo každému rozšíreniu, známe ako číslo rozšírenia.
 8. ZHODA VÝROBY
 8.1.
 Postupy týkajúce sa zhody výroby zodpovedajú všeobecným ustanoveniam uvedeným v doplnku 2 k dohode (E/ECE/324-E/ECE/TRANS/505/Rev.2) a spĺňajú tieto požiadavky:
 8.2.
 vozidlo schválené podľa tohto predpisu sa vyrába tak, aby zodpovedalo schválenému typu splnením požiadaviek uvedených v bode 5;
 8.3.
 príslušný orgán, ktorý udelil schválenie, môže kedykoľvek overiť zhodu kontrolných metód uplatniteľných na každú výrobnú jednotku. Tieto kontroly sa zvyčajne vykonávajú raz za dva roky.
 9. SANKCIE ZA NEDODRŽANIE ZHODY VÝROBY
 9.1.
 Schválenie udelené typu vozidla podľa tohto predpisu sa môže odňať, ak nie sú splnené požiadavky ustanovené v odseku 8.
 9.2.
 Ak zmluvná strana odníme schválenie, ktorú predtým udelila, bezodkladne to oznámi ostatným zmluvným stranám, ktoré uplatňujú tento predpis, prostredníctvom formulára oznámenia podľa vzoru uvedeného v prílohe 1 k tomuto predpisu.
 10. DEFINITÍVNE ZASTAVENIE VÝROBY
 Ak držiteľ schválenia úplne pozastaví výrobu typu vozidla schváleného v súlade s týmto predpisom, informuje o tom orgán, ktorý schválenie udelil a ktorý zasa o tom bezodkladne informuje ostatné zmluvné strany dohody, ktoré uplatňujú tento predpis, prostredníctvom formulára oznámenia podľa vzoru uvedeného v prílohe 1 k tomuto predpisu.
 11. NÁZVY A ADRESY TECHNICKÝCH SLUŽIEB ZODPOVEDNÝCH ZA VYKONÁVANIE SCHVAĽOVACÍCH SKÚŠOK A NÁZVY A ADRESY SPRÁVNYCH ODDELENÍ
 Zmluvné strany dohody, ktoré uplatňujú tento predpis, oznámia sekretariátu Organizácie Spojených národov názvy a adresy technických služieb zodpovedných za vykonávanie schvaľovacích skúšok, názvy a adresy správnych oddelení, ktoré udeľujú schválenie a ktorým sa majú zasielať formuláre osvedčujúce schválenie, rozšírenie, zamietnutie alebo odňatie schválenia.
 (1) Podľa prílohy 7 k Súhrnnej rezolúcii o konštrukcii vozidiel (R.E.3) (dokument TRANS/WP.29/78/Rev.1/Zmena 2).
 (2) Hmotnosť vozidla v pohotovostnom stave zahŕňa hmotnosť vozidla a jeho karosérie s chladiacou kvapalinou, mazivami, palivom, 100 % ostatných kvapalín, náradím, náhradným kolesom a vodičom. Predpokladaná hmotnosť vodiča je 75 kg (rozdelená takto: 68 kg pre hmotnosť samotného vodiča a 7 kg pre hmotnosť batožiny, v súlade s normou ISO 2416:1992. Palivová nádrž obsahuje 90 % a ostatné zariadenia obsahujúce kvapalinu (okrem tých, ktoré sú určené pre odpadovú vodu) 100 % kapacity stanovenej výrobcom.
 (3) 1 pre Nemecko, 2 pre Francúzsko, 3 pre Taliansko, 4 pre Holandsko, 5 pre Švédsko, 6 pre Belgicko, 7 pre Maďarsko, 8 pre Českú republiku, 9 pre Španielsko, 10 pre Srbsko, 11 pre Spojené kráľovstvo, 12 pre Rakúsko, 13 pre Luxembursko, 14 pre Švajčiarsko, 15 (neobsadené), 16 pre Nórsko, 17 pre Fínsko, 18 pre Dánsko, 19 pre Rumunsko, 20 pre Poľsko, 21 pre Portugalsko, 22 pre Ruskú federáciu, 23 pre Grécko, 24 pre Írsko, 25 pre Chorvátsko, 26 pre Slovinsko, 27 pre Slovensko, 28 pre Bielorusko, 29 pre Estónsko, 30 (neobsadené), 31 pre Bosnu a Hercegovinu, 32 pre Lotyšsko, 33 (neobsadené), 34 pre Bulharsko, 35 a 36 (neobsadené), 37 pre Turecko, 38 a 39 (neobsadené), 40 pre Bývalú juhoslovanskú republiku Macedónsko, 41 (neobsadené), 42 pre Európske spoločenstvo (schválenie udeľujú členské štáty s použitím príslušných schvaľovacích značiek EHK), 43 pre Japonsko, 44 (neobsadené), 45 pre Austráliu, 46 pre Ukrajinu, 47 pre Južnú Afriku, 48 pre Nový Zéland, 49 pre Cyprus, 50 pre Maltu a 51 pre Kórejskú republiku. Nasledujúce čísla sa pridelia ďalším krajinám v chronologickom poradí, v akom ratifikujú dohodu o prijatí jednotných technických predpisov pre kolesové vozidlá, vybavenie a časti, ktorými môžu byť vybavené kolesové vozidlá a/alebo ktoré sa v nich môžu používať, a o podmienkach vzájomného uznávania schválení udelených na základe týchto predpisov alebo v poradí, v akom pristúpia k tejto dohode, a takto pridelené čísla oznámi generálny tajomník Organizácie Spojených národov zmluvným stranám dohody.
 (4) Podľa bodu 2.2 prílohy 18 k predpisu č. 43 o schválení bezpečnostného zasklenia a zasklievacieho materiálu.
 PRÍLOHA 1
 OZNÁMENIE
 [Maximálny formát: A4 (210 × 297 mm)]
 PRÍLOHA 2
 USPORIADANIE SCHVAĽOVACÍCH ZNAČIEK
 (pozri body 4.4 až 4.4.2 tohto predpisu)
 PRÍLOHA 3
 Postup na určenie bodu „H“ a skutočného uhla trupu pre polohy sedenia v motorových vozidlách
 1. ÚČEL
 1.1. Postup opísaný v tejto prílohe sa používa na určenie polohy bodu „H“ a skutočného uhla trupu pre jednu alebo viac polôh sedenia v motorovom vozidle a na overenie vzájomného vzťahu zmeraných údajov ku konštrukčným špecifikáciám, ktoré poskytol výrobca vozidla (1).
 2. VYMEDZENIE POJMOV
 Na účely tejto smernice sa vymedzujú tieto pojmy.
 2.1. „Referenčné údaje“ znamenajú jednu alebo viac nasledujúcich charakteristík polohy sedenia:
 2.1.1.
 bod „H“ a bod „R“ a ich vzájomný vzťah;
 2.1.2.
 skutočný uhol trupu a konštrukčný uhol trupu a ich vzťah.
 2.2. „Trojrozmerný stroj bodu H“ (3-D „H“ stroj) znamená zariadenie používané na určenie bodov „H“ a skutočných uhlov trupu. Toto zariadenie je opísané v doplnku 1 k tejto prílohe.
 2.3. Bod „H“ znamená stred otáčania trupu a stehna 3-D H stroja inštalovaného na sedadle vozidla v súlade s postupom opísaným v odseku 4. Bod „H“ leží v strede osi zariadenia, t. j. v strede medzi krúžkami priezorov bodu „H“ na oboch stranách 3-D H stroja. Bod „H“ teoreticky zodpovedá bodu „R“ (pozri tolerancie v bode 3.2.2.). Hneď ako je bod „H“ určený v súlade s postupom opísaným v odseku 4, považuje sa za pevný vo vzťahu ku konštrukcii čalúnenia sedadla a má sa pohybovať spolu s ním pri nastavovaní sedadla.
 2.4. Bod „R“ alebo „referenčný bod sedenia“ znamená konštrukčný bod definovaný výrobcom vozidla pre každú polohu sedenia a určený vo vzťahu k trojrozmernému referenčnému systému.
 2.5. „Čiara trupu“ znamená os sondy stroja 3-D H so sondou v úplne zadnej polohe.
 2.6. „Skutočný uhol trupu“ znamená uhol zmeraný medzi vertikálnou čiarou prechádzajúcou cez bod „H“ a čiarou trupu s použitím kvadrantu uhla chrbta na 3-D H stroji. Skutočný uhol trupu teoreticky zodpovedá konštrukčnému uhlu trupu (pozri tolerancie v bode 3.2.2).
 2.7. „Konštrukčný uhol trupu“ znamená uhol medzi vertikálnou čiarou prechádzajúcou bodom „R“ a čiarou trupu v polohe, ktorá zodpovedá konštrukčnej polohe operadla zadného sedadla určenej výrobcom vozidla.
 2.8. „Stredová rovina cestujúceho“ (CPO) znamená strednú rovinu 3-D H stroja umiestnenú v každej označenej polohe sedenia; je reprezentovaná súradnicou bodu „H“ na osi „Y“. V prípade individuálnych sedadiel sa stredná rovina sedadla zhoduje so strednou rovinou cestujúceho. Pre ostatné sedadlá špecifikuje strednú rovinu cestujúceho výrobca.
 2.9. „Trojrozmerný referenčný systém“ znamená systém opísaný v doplnku 2 k tejto prílohe.
 2.10. „Východiskové značky“ znamenajú fyzické body (otvory, plochy, značky alebo zárezy) na karosérii vozidla definované výrobcom.
 2.11. „Meracia poloha vozidla“ znamená polohu vozidla určenú súradnicami východiskových značiek v trojrozmernom referenčnom systéme.
 3. POŽIADAVKY
 3.1. Uvedenie údajov
 Pre každú polohu sedenia sa vyžadujú referenčné údaje na preukázanie zhody s ustanoveniami tohto predpisu, všetky uvedené údaje alebo ich primeraný výber sa predkladá vo forme uvedenej v doplnku 3 k tejto prílohe:
 3.1.1.
 súradnice bodu „R“ vzhľadom na trojrozmerný referenčný systém;
 3.1.2.
 konštrukčný uhol trupu;
 3.1.3.
 všetky indikácie nevyhnutné na nastavenie sedadla (ak je nastaviteľné) do meracej polohy uvedenej v bode 4.3.
 3.2. Vzťah medzi nameranými hodnotami a konštrukčnými špecifikáciami
 3.2.1. Súradnice bodu „H“ a hodnota skutočného uhla trupu získaného postupom uvedeným v odseku 4 sa porovnajú jednotlivo so súradnicami bodu „R“ a hodnotou konštrukčného uhla trupu udaného výrobcom vozidla.
 3.2.2. Vzájomné polohy bodu „R“ a bodu „H“ a vzťah medzi konštrukčným uhlom trupu a skutočným uhlom trupu sa považujú za vyhovujúce pre danú polohu sedenia, ak bod „H“ definovaný svojimi súradnicami leží vnútri štvorca so stranou dlhou 50 mm s horizontálnymi a vertikálnymi stranami, ktorého uhlopriečky sa pretínajú v bode „R“, a ak je skutočný uhol trupu v rozmedzí 5o konštrukčného uhla trupu.
 3.2.3. Ak sú tieto podmienky splnené, bod „R“ a konštrukčný uhol trupu sa použijú na preukázanie súladu s ustanoveniami tohto predpisu.
 3.2.4. Ak bod „H“ alebo skutočný uhol trupu nespĺňajú požiadavky uvedené v bode 3.2.2, bod „H“ a skutočný uhol trupu sa určia ešte dva razy (celkovo tri razy). Ak výsledky dvoch z týchto troch operácií spĺňajú zmienené požiadavky, uplatňujú sa podmienky uvedené v bode 3.2.3.
 3.2.5. Ak výsledky aspoň dvoch z troch operácií opísaných v bode 3.2.4 nespĺňajú požiadavky uvedené v bode 3.2.2 alebo ak sa overenie nemôže uskutočniť, pretože výrobca vozidla neposkytol informácie týkajúce sa polohy bodu „R“ alebo konštrukčného uhla trupu, použije sa ťažisko troch nameraných bodov alebo aritmetický priemer troch nameraných uhlov a považuje sa za uplatniteľný vo všetkých prípadoch, keď sa v tomto predpise uvádza bod „R“ alebo konštrukčný uhol trupu.
 4. POSTUP NA URČENIE BODU „H“ A SKUTOČNÉHO UHLA TRUPU
 4.1. Vozidlo sa pripravuje podľa uváženia výrobcu pri teplote 20° C ± 10° C, aby sa zabezpečilo, že materiál sedadla dosiahne izbovú teplotu. Ak na sedadle, ktoré sa má skontrolovať, nikdy nikto nesedel, na sedadlo sa dva razy za minútu posadí osoba alebo zariadenie s hmotnosťou 70 až 80 kg s cieľom pokrčiť podušku a operadlo sedadla. Na žiadosť výrobcu zostanú úplné zostavy sedadiel nezaťažené najmenej 30 minút pred inštalovaním 3-D H stroja.
 4.2. Vozidlo je v meracej polohe definovanej v bode 2.11.
 4.3. Sedadlo, ak je nastaviteľné, sa najprv nastaví do najzadnejšej krajnej normálnej polohy na riadenie alebo na jazdu podľa údajov výrobcu, pričom sa berie do úvahy len pozdĺžne nastavenie sedadla s vylúčením posunu sedadla používaného na iné účely, ako sú normálne polohy na riadenie alebo jazdu. Ak existujú iné spôsoby nastavenia (vertikálne, uhlové, nastavenie operadla sedadla atď.), tieto sa nastavia podľa špecifikácie výrobcu vozidla. Pri odpružených sedadlách sa napevno zafixuje vertikálna poloha tak, aby zodpovedala normálnej polohe na riadenie podľa špecifikácie výrobcu.
 4.4. Plocha polohy sedenia, ktorá je v kontakte s 3-D H strojom, je prikrytá bavlnenou tkaninou dostatočného rozmeru a vhodnej štruktúry, opísanou ako hladká bavlnená tkanina s 18,9 nite na cm2 a vážiaca 0,228 kg/m2 alebo pletená alebo netkaná tkanina s rovnocennými vlastnosťami.
 Ak skúška prebieha na sedadle mimo vozidla, podlaha, na ktorej je sedadlo umiestnené, má tie isté základné charakteristiky (2) ako podlaha vozidla, v ktorom sa má sedadlo používať.
 4.5. Zostava sedacej a chrbtovej časti 3-D H stroja sa umiestni tak, aby sa stredová rovina cestujúceho (CPO) zhodovala so stredovou rovinou 3-D H stroja. Na žiadosť výrobcu možno 3-D H stroj posunúť smerom dovnútra vzhľadom na CPO, ak je 3-D H stroj umiestnený natoľko v smere von, že okraj sedadla nedovoľuje vyrovnanie 3-D H stroja.
 4.6. Pripevnite zostavy chodidla a dolnej časti nohy k zostave panvy sedacej časti buď jednotlivo, alebo pomocou zostavy priehlavkovej spony a dolnej časti nohy. Čiara prechádzajúca krúžkami priezorov bodu „H“ je rovnobežná so základňou a kolmá na pozdĺžnu stredovú rovinu sedadla.
 4.7. Polohy chodidiel a nôh 3-D H stroja nastavte takto:
 4.7.1. Konštrukčná poloha sedenia: vodič a cestujúci na krajnom prednom sedadle
 4.7.1.1.
 Obidve zostavy chodidiel a nôh sa posunú dopredu tak, že chodidlá zaujmú, ak je potrebné, prirodzenú polohu na podlahe medzi ovládacími pedálmi. Ak to bude možné, ľavé chodidlo bude umiestnené približne v rovnakej vzdialenosti vľavo od stredovej roviny 3-D H stroja ako pravé chodidlo vpravo. Libela overujúca priečnu orientáciu 3-D H stroja sa uvedie do horizontálnej polohy prispôsobením panvy sedacej časti v prípade potreby alebo nastavením zostavy nohy a chodidla smerom dozadu. Čiara prechádzajúca krúžkami priezorov bodu „H“ sa ponechá kolmá na pozdĺžnu stredovú rovinu sedadla.
 4.7.1.2.
 Ak sa ľavá noha nemôže udržať v polohe rovnobežnej s pravou nohou a ľavé chodidlo sa nemôže podoprieť konštrukciou podlahy, posúva sa dovtedy, kým nie je podoprené. Vyrovnanie krúžkov priezorov sa zachová.
 4.7.2. Designated seating position: outboard rear seat
 Pri zadných alebo pomocných sedadlách sa nohy umiestnia, tak ako určí výrobca. Ak potom chodidlá spočívajú na častiach podlahy v rozdielnych výškach, chodidlo, ktoré ako prvé príde do styku s predným sedadlom, slúži ako referenčné a druhé chodidlo sa nastaví tak, aby libela uvádzajúca priečnu orientáciu sedacej časti zariadenia ukazovala horizontálnu polohu.
 4.7.3. Ostatné konštrukčné polohy sedenia
 Treba sa riadiť všeobecným postupom uvedeným v bode 4.7.1, s tou výnimkou, že chodidlo sa umiestni tak, ako to špecifikoval výrobca vozidla.
 4.8. Na dolnú časť nohy a stehna sa pripevnia závažia a 3-D H stroj sa vyrovná.
 4.9. Sklopte chrbtovú panvu dopredu proti prednej zarážke a odtiahnite 3-D H stroj od operadla sedadla pomocou priehlavkovej spony. Znovu umiestnite 3-D H stroj na sedadlo jednou z týchto metód:
 4.9.1.
 Ak má 3-D H stroj tendenciu posúvať sa smerom dozadu, použite tento postup. Nechajte, aby sa 3-D H stroj posunul dozadu, až kým viac nebude potrebné predné horizontálne obmedzujúce zaťaženie na priehlavkovú sponu, t. j. kým panva sedacej časti nepríde do kontaktu s operadlom sedadla. V prípade potreby upravte polohu dolnej časti nohy.
 4.9.2.
 Ak 3-D H stroj nemá tendenciu posúvať sa smerom dozadu, použite tento postup. Posuňte 3-D H stroj smerom dozadu pomocou horizontálneho zadného zaťaženia na priehlavkovú sponu, kým panva sedacej časti nepríde do kontaktu s operadlom sedadla (pozri obrázok 2 doplnku 1 k tejto prílohe).
 4.10. Aplikujte zaťaženie 100 ± 10 N na zostavu operadla a panvy 3-D H stroja v priesečníku kvadrantu bedrového uhla a puzdra priehlavkovej spony. Smer pôsobenia zaťaženia sa udržiava pozdĺž čiary prechádzajúcej uvedeným priesečníkom k bodu tesne nad puzdrom stehennej tyče (pozri obrázok 2 doplnku 1 k tejto prílohe). Potom sa chrbtová panva opatrne vráti na operadlo sedadla. Počas celej zvyšnej časti postupu treba postupovať opatrne, aby sa zabránilo posúvaniu 3-D H stroja smerom dopredu.
 4.11. Nasadí sa pravé a ľavé závažie sedacej časti a potom striedavo osem závaží trupu. Udržiavajte úroveň 3-D H stroja.
 4.12. Chrbtová panva sa sklopí dopredu, aby sa uvoľnilo napätie na operadle sedadla. 3-D H strojom sa kolíše zo strany na stranu v 10° oblúku (5° na každú stranu od vertikálnej stredovej roviny) počas troch úplných cyklov, aby sa uvoľnilo všetko nahromadené trenie medzi 3-D H strojom a sedadlom.
 Počas kývania môže mať priehlavková spona 3-D H stroj tendenciu odkláňať sa od horizontálneho a vertikálneho vyrovnania. Priehlavková spona musí byť preto počas kývavých pohybov pridržaná s použitím primeranej bočnej sily. Pri držaní priehlavkovej spony a kývaní 3-D H strojom treba postupovať opatrne, aby sa zabezpečilo, že vo vertikálnom alebo pozdĺžnom smere sa nebudú aplikovať žiadne mimovoľné vonkajšie zaťaženia.
 Počas tohto kroku sa chodidlá 3-D H stroja nemajú pridržiavať alebo držať. Ak chodidlá zmenia polohu, majú sa v tejto polohe na chvíľu ponechať.
 Chrbtová panva sa opatrne vráti na operadlo sedadla a skontroluje sa, či sú obe libely v nulovej polohe. Ak počas kývania 3-D H strojom došlo k akémukoľvek pohybu chodidiel, ich poloha sa musí obnoviť takto:
 Striedavo sa zdvihne každé chodidlo nad podlahu o najmenšiu nevyhnutnú mieru, až kým už nedochádza k žiadnemu dodatočnému pohybu chodidla. Počas tohto dvíhania sa chodidlá môžu otáčať; nemá sa na ne aplikovať žiadne dopredu smerujúce alebo bočné zaťaženie. Keď sa každé chodidlo vráti späť do svojej dolnej polohy, päta má byť v kontakte s konštrukciou určenou na tento účel.
 Skontrolujte nulovú polohu na bočnej libele; v prípade potreby aplikujte bočné zaťaženie na hornú časť chrbtovej panvy dostatočné na vyrovnanie panvy sedacej časti 3-D H stroja na sedadle.
 4.13. Pridržiavajte priehlavkovú sponu 3-D H stroja, aby sa neposúvala dopredu na poduške sedadla, a postupujte takto:
 a)
 vráťte chrbtovú panvu k operadlu sedadla;
 b)
 striedavo aplikujte a uvoľňujte horizontálne zaťaženie pôsobiace smerom dozadu, nepresahujúce 25 N, do tyče uhla chrbta približne vo výške stredu trupových závaží, až kým kvadrant bedrového uhla neukáže, že bola dosiahnutá stála poloha po uvoľnení zaťaženia. Treba postupovať opatrne, aby sa zabezpečilo, že na 3-D H stroj nepôsobí žiadne zaťaženie smerujúce dole alebo do strán. Ak je potrebné ďalšie nastavenie úrovne 3-D H stroja, otáčajte chrbtovú panvu dopredu, znovu vyrovnajte a zopakujte postup z bodu 4.12.
 4.14. Vykonajte všetky merania:
 4.14.1.
 Súradnice bodu „H“ sa merajú vzhľadom na trojrozmerný referenčný systém.
 4.14.2.
 Skutočný uhol trupu sa odčíta na kvadrante chrbtového uhla 3-D H stroja so sondou v jej úplne zadnej polohe.
 4.15. Ak sa vyžaduje opätovná inštalácia 3-D H stroja, zostava sedadiel ostane nezaťažená aspoň na 30 minút pred opätovnou inštaláciou. 3-D H stroj nemá zostať nezaťažený na zostave sedadiel dlhšie ako na čas nevyhnutný na vykonanie skúšky.
 4.16. Ak možno sedadlá v tom istom rade považovať za podobné (lavicové sedadlo, identické sedadlá atď.), určí sa pre každý rad sedadiel iba jeden bod „H“ a jeden „skutočný uhol trupu“, pričom 3-D H stroj popísaný v doplnku 1 k tejto prílohe je usadený na mieste považovanom za reprezentatívne pre tento rad.
 Týmto miestom je:
 4.16.1.
 v prípade predného radu sedadlo vodiča;
 4.16.2.
 v prípade zadného radu alebo radov vonkajšie sedadlo.
 (1) V akejkoľvek polohe sedenia inej ako predné sedadlá nemožno bod „H“ určiť s použitím „trojrozmerného stroja bodu H“ alebo iných postupov, bod „R“ označený výrobcom možno podľa uváženia príslušného orgánu považovať za referenčný bod.
 (2) Uhol náklonu, výškový rozdiel voči upevneniu sedadla, štruktúra povrchu atď.
 Doplnok 1
 Opis trojrozmerného stroja bodu „H“ (3-D H stroj)
 (1)
 1. CHRBTOVÁ PANVA A PANVA SEDACEJ ČASTI
 Chrbtová panva a panva sedacej časti sú zhotovené z vystuženého plastu a kovu; simulujú ľudský trup a stehno a sú mechanicky zavesené v bode „H“. Kvadrant je pripevnený k sonde zavesenej v bode „H“ na meranie skutočného uhla trupu. Nastaviteľná stehenná tyč pripojená k panve sedacej časti určuje os stehien a slúži ako základná čiara pre kvadrant bedrového uhla.
 2. PRVKY TELA A NOHY
 Dolné segmenty nôh sú spojené so zostavou panvy sedacej časti v mieste priehlavkovej spony spájajúcej kolená, ktorá je priečnym nástavcom nastaviteľnej stehennej tyče. Kvadranty sú zabudované do dolných segmentov nôh na meranie kolenných uhlov Zostavy obuvi a chodidla sú kalibrované na meranie uhla chodidla. Dve libely orientujú zariadenie v priestore. Závažia segmentov tela sú umiestnené v príslušných ťažiskách, aby bolo vyvolané zaťaženie sedadla zodpovedajúce mužovi s hmotnosťou 76 kg. Všetky kĺby 3-D H stroja by sa mali skontrolovať na voľný pohyb bez výskytu badateľného trenia.
 Obrázok 1
 Označenie prvkov 3-D H stroja
 Obrázok 2
 Rozmery prvkov 3-D H stroja a rozmiestnenie zaťaženia
 (1) Stroj zodpovedá opisu v norme ISO 6549-1980. V prípade záujmu o detaily zostrojenia 3-D H stroja kontaktujte Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE), 400 Commonwealth Drive, Warrendale, Pennsylvania 15096, USA.
 Doplnok 2
 TROJROZMERNÝ REFERENČNÝ SYSTÉM
 1.
 Trojrozmerný referenčný systém je definovaný troma ortogonálnymi rovinami, ktoré určil výrobca vozidla (pozri obrázok) (1).
 2.
 Meraciu polohu vozidla určuje umiestnenie vozidla na nosnej ploche tak, aby súradnice východiskových značiek zodpovedali hodnotám, ktoré označil výrobca.
 3.
 Súradnice bodu „R“ a bodu „H“ sú určené vo vzťahu k východiskovým značkám stanoveným výrobcom vozidla.
 (1) Referenčný systém zodpovedá norme ISO 4130:1978.
 Doplnok 3
 REFERENČNÉ ÚDAJE TÝKAJÚCE SA POLÔH SEDENIA
 1. KÓDOVANIE REFERENČNÝCH ÚDAJOV
 Referenčné údaje sa zaznamenávajú postupne pre každú polohu sedenia. Polohy sedenia sú identifikované kódom, ktorý pozostáva z dvoch znakov. Prvý znak je arabská číslica a označuje rad sedadiel, počítajúc od prednej k zadnej časti vozidla. Druhý znak je veľké písmeno, ktoré označuje umiestnenie polohy sedenia v rade pri pohľade v smere pohybu vozidla dopredu; používajú sa tieto písmená:
 L= vľavo,
 C= uprostred,
 R= vpravo.
 2. OPIS MERACEJ PLOHY VOZIDLA
 2.1. Súradnice východiskových značiek
 X ...
 Y ...
 Z ...
 3. ZOZNAM REFERENČNÝCH ÚDAJOV
 3.1. Poloha sedenia: ...
 3.1.1. Súradnice bodu „R“:
 X ...
 Y ...
 Z ...
 3.1.2. Konštrukčný uhol trupu: ...
 3.1.3. Špecifikácie pre nastavenie sedadla (1)
 horizontálne: ...
 vertikálne: ...
 uhlové: ...
 uhol trupu:...
 Poznámka: Zoznam referenčných údajov pre ďalšie polohy sedenia je uvedený v bodoch 3.2, 3.3 atď.
 (1) Nehodiace sa prečiarknite.
 ÍLOHA 4
 Metóda určenia rozmerového vzťahu medzi základnými referenčnými značkami vozidla a trojrozmernou referenčnou sieťou
 1. VZŤAH MEDZI REFERENČNOU SIEŤOU A ZÁKLADNÝMI REFERENČNÝMI ZNAČKAMI VOZIDLA
 Na overenie špecifických rozmerov na vozidle alebo vnútri vozidla, predvedeného na schválenie v súlade s týmto predpisom, sa musí presne stanoviť vzťah medzi súradnicami trojrozmernej referenčnej siete definovanej v bode 2.3, ktoré boli stanovené v počiatočnom štádiu konštrukcie vozidla, a polohami základných referenčných značiek definovaných v bode 2.4 tak, aby špecifické body na výkresoch výrobcu vozidla mohli byť identifikované na skutočnom vozidle vyrobenom podľa týchto výkresov.
 2. METÓDA STANOVENIA VZŤAHU MEDZI REFERENČNOU SIEŤOU A REFERENČNÝMI ZNAČKAMI
 Na tento účel sa vytvorí základná referenčná rovina, ktorá je vyznačená meraním pozdĺž súradníc X-X a Y-Y. Metóda dosiahnutia je znázornená na obrázku 6 v doplnku k tejto prílohe, pričom referenčnou rovinou bude pevný, plochý a horizontálny povrch, na ktorom vozidlo stojí a na ktorý sa pevne pripevnia dve meracie stupnice; tieto sú rozdelené na milimetre, pričom stupnica X-X nie je kratšia ako osem metrov a stupnica Y-Y nie je kratšia ako štyri metre. Obe stupnice musia navzájom zvierať pravý uhol tak, ako je to znázornené na obrázku 6 doplnku k tejto prílohe. Priesečníkom týchto stupníc je základná nulová poloha.
 3. OVEROVANIE REFERENČNEJ ROVINY
 Aby sa zohľadnili drobné odchýlky od rovnosti referenčnej roviny alebo skúšobnej plochy, bude potrebné zistiť odchýlky od základnej nulovej polohy u stupnice X aj stupnice Y v odstupoch po 250 mm a zaznamenať zistené hodnoty tak, aby sa pri kontrole vozidla mohli vykonať korekcie.
 4. SKUTOČNÁ SKÚŠOBNÁ POLOHA
 Aby sa zohľadnili menšie zmeny výšky zavesenia atď., je potrebné, aby boli k dispozícii prostriedky na uvedenie základných referenčných značiek do správnych súradnicových polôh vzhľadom ku konštrukčnej polohe skôr, ako sa vykonajú ďalšie merania. Okrem toho musí byť možné vykonávať menšie nastavovania priečnej a/alebo pozdĺžnej polohy vozidla tak, aby bolo umiestnené presne vo vzťahu k referenčnej sieti.
 5. VÝSLEDKY
 Po uvedení vozidla do správnej polohy vzhľadom k referenčnej sieti a do jeho konštrukčnej polohy sa môže ľahko stanoviť poloha bodov, ktoré sú potrebné na skúmanie podmienok viditeľnosti dopredu.
 Skúšobné metódy stanovenia týchto požiadaviek môžu zahŕňať použitie teodolitov, svetelných zdrojov alebo tieniacich zariadení alebo akúkoľvek inú metódu poskytujúcu preukázateľne rovnocenné výsledky.
 Doplnok
 Obrázok 1
 Stanovenie bodov V
 Obrázok 2
 Body pozorovania na stĺpikoch A
 Obrázok 3
 Uhol zakrytia výhľadu
 Obrázok 4
 Zhodnotenie prekážok priameho výhľadu vodiča smerom dopredu v rozsahu 180°
 Obrázok 5
 Rozmerový diagram so zobrazením relatívnych polôh bodov E a bodov P
 Obrázok 6
 Horizontálna referenčná rovina


type: other

text:
Din position: Hem > Stockholms stad > Äldrenämnden > Sammanträde 2020-04-21
 3 Anmälan av protokollsjustering ÄN 3/2020-03-17
 7 Underlag till budget 2021 med inriktning 2022 och 2023 för äldrenämnden
 Dnr 1.2.1-108/2020
 07. 1.1.3-704-2019 Bilagor Instruktion för äldreförvaltningens inspektörer.pdf (3 574 kb) 07. 1.1.3-704-2019 Instruktion för äldreförvaltningens inspektörer.pdf (1 072 kb) 07. 1.2.1-108-2020 Bilaga 1 - ÄN 2021-2023.pdf (55 kb)
 8 Remiss av motion av Peter Wallmark och Martin Westmont (båda SD) om att kvalitetssäkra stadens tolkverksamhet
 Dnr 1.6-129/2020
 9 Remiss av Institutet för språk och folkminnens rapport
 Språkcentrum för nationella minoritetsspråk, avseende jiddisch och romani chib
 Dnr 1.6-157/2020
 09. 1.6-157-2020 Bilaga - Språkcentrumutredningen slutrapport 2019.pdf (1 516 kb)
 10 Remiss av Överenskommelse mellan kommunerna i Stockholms län om ärendeansvar för hemlösa
 Dnr 1.6-161/2020
 11 Remiss av motion av Clara Lindblom (V) om behovet av långsiktiga medel för kompetensutveckling kopplat till kompetensförsörjningsbehovet
 Dnr 1.6-122/2020
 11. Motion om behovet av långsiktiga medel för kompetensutveckling kopplat till kompetensförsörjningsbehovet.pdf (125 kb)
 12 Remiss av Motion av Clara Lindblom och Robert Mjörnberg (båda V) om lokalvård i egen regi - något alla kan vinna på
 Dnr 1.6-125/2020
 12. Motion om lokalvård i egen regi – något alla kan vinna på.pdf (192 kb)
 13 Instruktion för äldreförvaltningens inspektörer
 Dnr 1.1.3-704/2019
 Handläggare: Kristina Hagström
 13. 1.1.3-704-2019 Bilaga 1 Instruktion för äldreförvaltningens inspektörer.pdf (68 kb) 13. 1.1.3-704-2019 Bilaga 2 Instruktion för äldreomsorgsinspektörer.pdf (16 kb) 13. 1.1.3-704-2019 Bilaga 3 Enhet för kvalitetsinspektioner.pdf (239 kb)
 14 Fördelning av stimulansmedel för att motverka ensamhet bland äldre och för ökad kvalitet i vården och omsorgen om personer med demenssjukdom
 Dnr 3.4-107/2020
 14. 3-4-107-2020 Bilaga - Fördelning medel ensamhet och demens per enhet korrigerad.pdf (481 kb)
 15 Fördelning av medel för arbetsmodellen ”Tryggt mottagande i hemmet”
 Dnr 3.4-140/2020
 Dnr 2.8-262/2020
 17 Anmälan av kontorsyttrande som svar på remiss av Idéburen välfärd, offentligt partnerskap (SOU 2020:56)
 Dnr 1.6-73/2020
 17. 1.6-73-2020 Bilaga Remiss av ldeburen välfärd, SOU 201956.pdf (94 kb)
 18 Anmälan av kontorsyttrande som svar på remiss av betänkandet samlade åtgärder för korrekta utbetalningar från välfärdssystemet
 Dnr 1.6-95/2020
 18. 1.6-95-2020 Bilaga Remiss av betänkandet Samlade åtgärder för korrekta utbetalningar från välfärdssystemet.pdf (3 878 kb)
 19 Anmälan av ej verkställda beslut , kvartal 4, 2019
 19. 4.1-309-2019 Bilaga - Sammanställning av ej verkställda beslut kvartal 4 - 2019.pdf (142 kb)
 20 Anmälan av ekonomisk månadsrapport för februari och mars 2020
 Dnr 1.2.2-99/2020
 20. 1.2.2-99-2020 Månadsrapport mars 2020 sifferbilaga.pdf (70 kb)
 21 Anmälan av protokoll från kommunstyrelsens pensionärsråd (KPR) från sammanträde den 10 mars och den 14 april 2020
 22 Anmälan av protokoll från det gemensamma för socialnämnden, äldrenämnden och överförmyndarnämnden råd för funktionshinderfrågor från den 12 mars och den 16 april 2020
 23 Anmälan av beslut fattade enligt delegation
 24 Postlista för 1 februari – 31 mars 2020
 §1_prot_20200421.pdf (28 kb)
 §2_prot_20200421.pdf (28 kb)
 §3 Anmälan av protokollsjustering ÄN 2/2020-02-18
 §3_prot_20200421.pdf (28 kb)
 §4_prot_20200421.pdf (28 kb)
 §5_prot_20200421.pdf (28 kb)
 §6_prot_20200421.pdf (89 kb)
 §7 Underlag till budget 2021 med inriktning 2022 och 2023 för äldrenämnden
 §7_prot_20200421.pdf (131 kb)
 §8 Remiss av motion av Peter Wallmark och Martin Westmont (båda SD) om att kvalitetssäkra stadens tolkverksamhet
 §8_prot_20200421.pdf (86 kb)
 §9 Remiss av Institutet för språk och folkminnens rapport Språkcentrum för nationella minoritetsspråk, avseende jiddisch och romani chib
 §9_prot_20200421.pdf (80 kb)
 §10 Remiss av Överenskommelse mellan kommunerna i Stockholms län om ärendeansvar för hemlösa
 §10_prot_20200421.pdf (19 kb)
 §11 Remiss av motion av Clara Lindblom (V) om behovet av långsiktiga medel för kompetensutveckling kopplat till kompetensförsörjningsbehovet
 §11_prot_20200421.pdf (27 kb)
 §12 Remiss av Motion av Clara Lindblom och Robert Mjörnberg (båda V) om lokalvård i egen regi - något alla kan vinna på
 §12_prot_20200421.pdf (25 kb)
 §13 Instruktion för äldreförvaltningens inspektörer
 §13_prot_20200421.pdf (19 kb)
 §14 Fördelning av stimulansmedel för att motverka ensamhet bland äldre och för ökad kvalitet i vården och omsorgen om personer med demenssjukdom
 §14_prot_20200421.pdf (123 kb)
 §15 Fördelning av medel för arbetsmodellen ”Tryggt mottagande i hemmet”
 §15_prot_20200421.pdf (118 kb)
 §16_prot_20200421.pdf (19 kb)
 §17 Anmälan av kontorsyttrande som svar på remiss av Idéburen välfärd, offentligt partnerskap (SOU 2020:56)
 §17_prot_20200421.pdf (22 kb)
 §18 Anmälan av kontorsyttrande som svar på remiss av betänkandet samlade åtgärder för korrekta utbetalningar från välfärdssystemet
 §18_prot_20200421.pdf (19 kb)
 §19 Anmälan av ej verkställda beslut, kvartal 4, 2019
 §19_prot_20200421.pdf (18 kb)
 §20 Anmälan av ekonomisk månadsrapport för februari och mars 2020
 §20_prot_20200421.pdf (18 kb)
 §21 Anmälan av protokoll från kommunstyrelsens pensionärsråd (KPR) från sammanträde den 10 mars och den 14 april 2020
 §21_prot_20200421.pdf (15 kb)
 §22 Anmälan av protokoll från det gemensamma för socialnämnden, äldrenämnden och överförmyndarnämnden råd för funktionshinderfrågor från den 12 mars och den 16 april 2020
 §22_prot_20200421.pdf (15 kb)
 §23 Anmälan av beslut fattade på delegation
 §23_prot_20200421.pdf (24 kb)
 §24 Postlista för 1 februari - 31 mars 2020
 §24_prot_20200421.pdf (21 kb)
 §25_prot_20200421.pdf (21 kb)