text:
Михаил Нехемиевич Тал () е осмият световен шампион по шахмат и журналист. През 1960 г. побеждава Михаил Ботвиник с 12,5:8,5 и така едва 23-годишен става най-младият световен шампион по шахмат за времето си. Застоява се на шахматния трон най-малко от всички други – година и 5 дни (Василий Смислов царувал 6 дни по-дълго). Губи титлата през 1961 г. в мача-реванш от Ботвиник с 8:13 т. след което, вече 24-годишен, станал и най-младият в историята ексшампион.
 Абсолютен световен рекордьор по броя на последователните игри без загуба – 7 турнира и 93 партии.
 Шампион на СССР за 1957, 1958, 1967, 1972, 1974 и 1978 г. По броя на титлите – 6 е рекордьор заедно с Ботвиник. Шампион на Латвийската ССР (1953, 1965), осемкратен олимпийски шампион в състава на отбора на СССР, трикратен световен шампион и шесткратен европейски шампион в състава на студентски отбори, победител в междузоналните турнири за световно първенство (1958, 1964, 1979), турнира на претендентите за световната титла (1959), участник в два финални мача за световната шахматна корона и седем мача на претендентите, победител в 44 международни турнира, Заслужил майстор на спорта на СССР (1960), главен редактор на списание „Шахматы“ (1960 – 1970). Тал е първият неофициален световен шампионат по блиц (1988).
 Известен е с атакуващия си стил. По време на игра гледал противниците си в очите и измислял някои от най-великите жертви и тактики в шахматната игра. Затова е наричан „Моцарт на шахматното изкуство“, „шахматният Паганини“, „великият актьор на шахматната сцена“, „вълшебникът от Рига“, „вихърът от Съветския съюз“, „демонът“, „пиратът на шахматната дъска“, „всяческа ферзь“ (фигура с неограничени възможности в шаха, дама, царица).
 Биография
 Роден е на 9 ноември 1936 г. Рига, Латвия в семейството на известния лекар от Рига Нихеми Тал и братовчедка му Ида Тал. Бил второ дете в семейството. Съгласно редица биографи на Тал, истинският му баща бил приятелят на семейството Роберт. За това знаел и Михаил и кръг от познати. Вдовицата на Тал Ангелина и дъщеря му Жанна опровергават това. На 6 месеца Тал преболедува много тежък вирусен менингит, след който поне 5 години не трябвало да се занимава с умствени натоварвания, но вместо това, на 3 години той вече четял, а на 5 – умножавал наум трицифрени числа. На 7-годишна възраст баща му го научава на древната игра и това предначертава съдбата му. Според други източници се научава да играе шах на 10 години. Притежавал необикновена памет: можел да повтори дума по дума медицинска лекция на баща си.
 Училище започва директно от 3-ти клас, а на 15-годишна възраст става студент в историко-филологическия факултет на Латвийския университет.
 Постъпва в шахматния кръжок в Двореца на пионерите и негов първи учител става знаменитият шахматен педагог Янис Крузкопс. Той веднага забелязва колко талантлив е младият му ученик, как страстно се борел зад дъската и как огнено горели очите му по време на игра, с каква възхитителна смелост жертвал своите фигури и колко мълниеносен бил разчетът му. На 12 години получава 2-ри разряд по шахмат и съществува легенда, че се считал за непобедим, затова когато разбрал за пребиваването на Ботвиник в Рига, не могъл да устои на изкушението да провери своята сила, взел под ръка шахматната дъска и се отправил на гости на Ботвиник. Срещата помежду им обаче така и не се състояла, понеже Ботвиник спял.
 През 1950 г. Тал покрива 1-ви разряд и за пръв път играе в шампионата на Латвия. Още тогава станал известен в републиката като любител на „мътните води“. Почти във всяка позиция търсел комбинационно усложнение и щом го намерел, то моментално жертвал някакъв материал.
 На 16 години става национален майстор на спорта.
 През 1954 г. разделя 2 – 3 място в шампионата на Латвия с бъдещия си приятел Айварс Гипслис. Същата година печели и мач срещу беларуския шампион Владимир Сайгин с 8:6 т. Дългогодишният му треньор Александър Кобленц си спомня за него: „Тал ненавижда пасивната защита. Винаги, когато му се удаде възможност да пристъпи в настъпление, използва шанса си. Умението на младия шахматист да се защитава е достоверен признак за шахматния му талант.“
 През 1956 г. неочаквано печели полуфинала на 23-тия шампионат на СССР в Ленинград и разделя 5 – 7 място на финала от 18 участника с 10,5/17 т. Григорий Левенфиш го нарича най-колоритната фигура в шампионата: „Той е изключително способен тактик, разчитащ комбинациите с поразителна бързина. Тал от първия кръг плени публиката със своя стремеж към остра и сложна игра... Големият му талант е налице.“
 Първият му международен дебют е 1957 г. в Швеция, където играе на 3-та дъска на студентското световно отборно първенство за състава на СССР след Корчной и Полугаевски. Разгромява шампиона сред юношите от 1951 г. Борислав Ивков, който след това публикува статия под пророчески надслов: „Тал! Запомнете това име!“ Печели златен медал на 3-та дъска – първи в колекцията му. Същата година печели 24-тия шампионат на СССР в Москва с 14/21 т. като побеждава и 2-рия, и 3-тия призьор (Бронщайн и Керес) – събитие, невиждано отдавна. Тал става международен гросмайстор и вторият най-млад шахматист, печелил първенството на СССР по шахмат за времето си.
 През 1957 г. завършва история и философия в университета в Рига.
 През 1958 г. за първи път шампионатът на СССР се провежда в латвийската столица Рига. Тал започва неудачно – с 4,5/9 т., но това не сломява духа му, а тъкмо напротив. След бурния финиш от 8/9 т. отново печели златен медал с 12,5/18 т., оставяйки зад себе си Петросян, Бронщайн, Авербах, Полугаевски, Спаски. Същата есен играе в междузоналния турнир в югославския адриатически град Порторож и именно той става изключително важен етап в неговата кариера. Печели 1-во място и прави първа стъпка към шахматния Олимп.
 През есента на 1958 г. играе на олимпиадата в Мюнхен за отбора на СССР. Той е едва 1-ва резерва и все пак е щастлив, че е попаднал в компанията на асове като Ботвиник, Смислов, Керес, Бронщайн. Именно там най-сетне се запознава с Ботвиник и след една от партиите световният шампион го попитал: „Защо вие пожертвахте пешка?“ Тал мигновено отвърнал: „Защото ми пречеше.“ С 12 победи и 3 ремита без нито една загуба заема 1-во място на своята дъска и печели златен медал.
 През 1959 г., подготвяйки се за турнира на претендентите, отново потвърждава своята класа като дели 2 – 3 място със Спаски на 26-ия шампионат на СССР в Тбилиси и като уверено побеждава съперниците си в крупния международен турнир в Цюрих, посветен на 150-годишнината от откриването на местното шахматно общество. 25 години по-рано тук играли Алехин, Ласкер, Еве, а сега – Тал, Глигорич, Керес, Боби Фишер. С 11,5/15 т. Тал повтаря успеха на Алехин.
 Световен шампион
 През есента на 1959 г. в югославските градове Блед, Загреб и Белград се провежда 4-кръговият турнир на 8-те претенденти – Смислов, Керес, Петросян, Тал, Глигорич, Олафсон, Бенко и 16-годишния Фишер. Въпреки успехите му в Мюнхен, Тбилиси и Цюрих, Тал не бил причислен към фаворитите. Преди турнира между гросмайсторите била разпространена анкета с най-вероятния победител от претендентите. Единствено Юрий Авербах посочил името Михаил Тал. След неудачното участие в Порторож Авербах станал секундант на Тал, но главен негов секундант и треньор бил Александър Кобленц, който дошъл за 5-ия кръг. Вероятно се отнасяли с недоверие към рискования стил на Тал. Главните му претенденти – Керес и Смислов имали много повече опит и не пропуснали нито един претендентски турнир, докато Тал бил дебютант. Смислов бил 2 пъти 1-ви в този турнир, а Керес – 2 пъти 2-ри. Високо оценявали и шансовете на шампиона на СССР от 1959 г. Тигран Петросян. Не било тайна, че 2 седмици до старта Тал бил опериран от апендицит и считали, че едва ли ще може да издържи на напрежението 28 кръга. С физическа кондиция бъдещият шампион никога не се отличавал. „Балтийският пират“, както го наричала местната преса, започнал турнира слабо, както винаги, но след това Тал си бил Тал. В 16-и, 17-и и 18-и кръг побеждава последователно Глигорич, Керес и Олафсон и повел в турнира. Такъв темп се оказал непосилен за другите участници и когато шахматистите пътували към югославската столица, вестниците писали: „7 гросмайстори се приближават към Белград, Тал – към Ботвиник!“ С 20/28 т. Тал спечелва турнира на претендентите, изпреварвайки с 1,5 т. Керес. Откликът на „Дойче шахцайтунг“ бил: „Тал е в шампионска форма! Предприемчив като Ботвиник, балансиращ над пропастта – като Ласкер, коварен в дебюта и мителшпила – като д-р Еве, изпълнен с неочаквани и фантастични замисли – като Алехин и по блестящата си игра – напомнящ Морфи“.
 От 15 март до 5 май 1960 г. в московския театър „Пушкин“ се провежда мачът за световната титла между двата антипода – Михаил Ботвиник и Михаил Тал. Главен арбитър е Щалберг. Секундант на Тал е Кобленц, секундант на Ботвиник – Голдберг. На входа на театъра Тал видял високата фигура на ексшампиона Еве, а Кобленц му прошепнал: „Това е на щастие. Срещата с Еве винаги носи късмет!“ И действително 23-годишният Тал преодолява 48-годишния Ботвиник в първата среща. Когато позициите носели остро-комбинационен характер, Тал бил в стихията си, но когато излизал „сух от водата“ и в позиционни, стратегически партии, Ботвиник се отчаял. При +6, –2, =13, на 23 години Миша Тал става 8-ият световен шампион по шахмат – най-младият.
 През есента на 1960 г. оглавява отбора на СССР на олимпиадата в Лайпциг. В деня на мача СССР-САЩ напливът на публиката е толкова голям, че организаторите ограничават броя на зрителите. Двубоят между Тал и Фишер пробужда изключителен интерес. Младият американец търсел реванш след турнира на претендентите в Югославия. Партията между двамата действително е много интересна, но завършва реми. След този мач отборът на СССР си осигурява титлата. Така в последния кръг Тал си позволява да допусне единствената загуба в турнира – от английския майстор Пенроуз. Завършва със златен медал на първа дъска при резултат +8, –1, =6.
 На единствения международен турнир, на който участва в качеството си на световен шампион, а именно новогодишния турнир в Стокхолм в началото на 1961 г., допуска 3 ремита и побеждава във всички останали партии, с което убедително извоюва 1-вия приз.
 Най-младият световен ексшампион
 Световни, олимпийски, европейски и всесъюзни първенства
 Тал не вярвал, че патриархът ще се възползва от правото си на реванш. Поканата на Ботвиник на 1 септември 1960 г. идва изненадващо за него. Още повече, че получава и поредните си сериозни бъбречни неразположения. Въпреки това се съгласява на мач-реванш.
 Когато постъпва поканата, Кобленц предлага на своя ученик да разгледат няколко партии на Ботвиник, играни след 1-вия мач помежду им. Тал шеговито отвръща: „Партии на Ботвиник?! Не сме ли се нагледали на тях? Дай по-добре да разгледаме партии на Керес.“ В този ден така и не започват подготовка. Кобленц предлага да сменят треньора за доброто на Тал, но шампионът мигновено отвръща: „Или вие, маестро, или никой!“. В навечерието на мача в Рига излиза първата книга на младия шампион „Мач Ботвиник-Тал“. В нея разказва за трудностите на подготовка, поради отсъствието на опит в мачови борби. Пише, че не отделял голямо внимание на подготовката, особено в дебюта. Това, естествено, дало отражение в първия двубой помежду им – не останал доволен от много от началните стадии. Но имало и своите плюсове – в началото на мача чувствал силен шахматен глад, а още по-важно, в края не чувствал ситост. Коментарите му били винаги интересни. За жертва на дама в една от партиите пише: „Дамата свърши своята работа – дамата повече не ми е нужна“. При това особено романтично възприятие на играта Тал се отнася с необходимата самокритика и уважение към противниковите ходове и планове като цяло.
 От 15 март до 12 май 1961 г. в московския естраден театър се провежда мачът-реванш между Ботвиник и Тал. Главен арбитър отново е Щалберг и секундант на Тал – отново Кобленц. Ботвиник се отказва от помощник. След първите 8 партии Ботвиник има минимално преимущество от 4,5:3,5 т. при 1 единствено реми. Мачът е най-резултатният от всички следвоенни мачове – само 6 ремита от 21 партии. Освен бъбречната криза, преди 9-ия кръг Тал е повален и от азиатски грип. Поддържа телесна температура от 39,5 градуса и единствено удивителната сила на духа му позволили да издържи физически. В 19-а партия удържа победа след 10-часова борба. Но самия мач губи с 8:13 т. (+5, -10, =6) и става най-младият в историята световен ексшампион по шахмат. След спечелване на реванша Ботвиник заявява: „Ако Тал се научи правилно да се програмира, то с него ще бъде невъзможно да се играе“. Обаче самопрограмирането е било органически чуждо на неговата натура.
 През есента на 1961 г. в Блед се провежда състезание, посветено на 30-годишнината от първия турнир в този югославски курорт, когато Алехин удържал победа, изпреварвайки с 5,5 т. 2-рия след него. Участват 15 гросмайстори и 5 майстори, всички най-силни шахматисти в света, с изключение на Ботвиник – Фишер, Керес, Петросян, Найдорф, Глигорич, Гелер, Пахман, Матанович, Олафсон... Тал започва неочаквано за стила си с победа срещу Ивков. Дълго време Фишер, Найдорф и ексшампионът водят класирането. Преди последния кръг Тал повежда с 0,5 т., а партията му с Найдорф в последния, проведена строго позиционно, показва, че е усвоил добре урока си от Ботвиник. С нея печелил турнира, изпреварвайки Фишер с 1 т. Малко след това дели 4 – 5 място на 29-ия шампионат на СССР в Баку.
 През март 1962 г., 2 месеца до турнира на претендентите в Кюрасао, получава остра бъбречна криза и дори операцията не облекчава особено болките му. Кобленц споделя, че не разбира как Тал е могъл изобщо да играе шах. Заради ненормалната работа на бъбреците му организмът му постоянно бил подложен на токсикация. След 3-тия кръг му се наложило да се оттегли отново в болница при актив от 3 победи, 8 ремита и 10 загуби (4 кръга с 8 участника по 4 партии всеки срещу всеки). Така опитът му за нов мач с „патриарха“ Ботвиник се проваля.
 Тал е включен като втора резерва в съветския отбор на 15-а шахматна олимпиада от 15 септември до 10 октомври 1962 г. във Варна и печели 1-во място на своята дъска (+7, —0, =6). От 21 ноември до 20 декември играе на шампионата на СССР и разделя 2—3-то с Тайманов (печели Корчной). Следващата година Тал побеждава на мемориала Асталош в Мишколц (Унгария) и коментира мача между Петросян и Ботвиник.
 В началото на новия претендентски цикъл (1964 – 1966) Тал разделя 1 – 4 място със Смислов, Спаски и Ларсен в междузоналния турнир, което му позволява да участва в мачовете на претендентите (тази система сменя турнирите на претендентите). Тал предсрочно побеждава Портиш (51⁄2:21⁄2) и с голям труд – Ларсен (51⁄2:41⁄2, в решаващата партия Тал в дебюта пожертва фигура и Ларсен не намира правилната защита). Във финалния мач Тал губи от Спаски с 4:7.
 През 1969 г. оперативно му е премахнат единия бъбрек, но това не го освобождава от проблеми със здравето, което нерядко му пречи да постигне по-високи резултати. Обаче и през тези години неговите успехи са достатъчно изразителни. През 1972 г. е едноличен шампион на СССР. През 1967 г. дели титлата с Полугаевски, през 1974 – с Белявски, а през 1978 – с Цешковски. Така с 6 шампионски титли на СССР заема 1-2-ро място с Ботвиник. Още 3 пъти е сребърен или бронзов медалист в шампионата: 2—3-то място (1971), 3-то място (1964 – 1965), 2—5-о място (1975).
 В следващия цикъл на кандидатските мачове (1978) той побеждава Глигорич с 5,5:3,5 (+3,–1,=5), но загубва от Корчной с 4,5:5,5 (+1,–2,=7).
 Михаил Тал побеждава убедително в рижкия междузонален турнир (1979) без загуба, с 14 точки от 17 възможни (2,5 точки пред втория Полугаевски), с което постига 82,3 % успеваемост. Това е втори резултат в историята на междузоналните турнири. В интервю за московското издателство „Физкультура и спорт“ Тал споделя, че „всъщност да играеш у дома не е предимство. Когато си фаворит и обект на такова внимание се играе по-трудно – всички очакват от теб само суперрезултати“. С това Тал прави поредния опит в борбата за висшата шахматна титла, но в четвъртфиналния мач отстъпва на Полугаевски с 2,5:5,5 (+0,–3,=5).
 За последен път той играе на междузонален турнир в Монпелие (1985), разделяйки 4-5-о място с Тиман, завършва наравно мача с него – 3:3 (+1,–1,=4), но отстъпва по допълнителни показатели.
 Най-добре от всички световни шампиони се е представил на олимпийски игри. С отбора на СССР Тал става 8 пъти победител на световни шахматни олимпиади. Като правило заема първо място на своята дъска, а 3 пъти показва абсолютно най-добрия резултат на олимпиадите.
 През 1980 г. достига най-високия си рейтинг ЕЛО – 2705 и играе в отбора на СССР на олимпиадата в Малта.
 Тал е 6-кратен шампион на Европа и 3-кратен шампион на света сред студентите в отбори състезания. Той с желание е приемал покани за игра с младежите (турнири на гросмайстори срещу млади майстори, турнири на пионерски дворци, където ръководи екипа на Рижкия дворец на пионерите и дава сеанси на екипи от млади шахматисти от други дворци, играе кореспондентски шах с читателите на вестник „Пионерска правда“ и др.), участвали във всякакви шахматни експерименти, където учените имали нужда от „готов за всичко“ гросмайстор (игра с хипнотизиране, игра с луди и т. н.).
 Голям любител на мълниеносната игра, Тал побеждава на I неофициално световно първенство по блиц-шах през 1988 г.
 Международни турнири и мачове
 От 1964 до 1988 г. Тал побеждава еднолично или дели първите места в 32 международни турнира:
 1-во място: Хейстингс, Рейкявик и Кисловодск (1964), Палма де Майорка (1966), Гори (1968), Сухуми (1972), Вайк ан Зее, Талин и Сочи (1973), Люблин, Гале и Нови Сад (1974), Талин и Сочи (1977), Малага (1979), Кьолн – Порц, Ереван и Сочи (1982).
 1—2-ро място: Сараево (1966), Тбилиси (1969 и 1986), Талин (1971), Дубна (1973), Ленинград (1977), Лвов (1981), Москва (1982), Талин (1983), Албена (1984), Юрмала (1985).
 1—3-то място: Западен Берлин (1986).
 1—4-то място: Хейстингс (1974) и Юрмала (1987).
 Участва в мачове с отбори на избраните шахматисти от света: 1970, Белград – 9-а дъска, наравно с Найдорф (+1, –1, =2) и 1984, Лондон – 7-а дъска, победа над Нан и реми с Нан и Чандлер.
 През периода от 23 октомври 1973 г. до 16 октомври 1974 г. изиграва без загуба 7 турнира и 93 партии, с което установява абсолютен световен рекорд.
 Награди
 За постижения в областта на шахмата е награден с орден „Почетен знак“ (1960) и орден „Дружба на народите“ (1981).
 Личен живот
 Тал е бил женен три пъти. Първата му съпруга става актрисата от Рижкия младежки театър Сали (Суламиф) Ландау. Те са сключват брак през 1958 г., а през 1960 г. им се ражда син (различни източници наричат името му Герман и Георгий), по-късно става лекар и емигрира в Израел. През 1970 г. съпрузите се развеждат.
 Тал сключва брак с грузинска актриса, който се оказва фиктивен, и през същата година се жени за машинописката Ангелина Петухова, с която живее до края на живота си. От третия брак през 1975 г. се ражда дъщеря му Жана. Дълго време живее в Германия. През 2016 г. Жана се премества в Русия.
 Тал е бил популярен сред жените и известен с романите си. Сред неговите почитатели са наричани актрисата Лариса Соболевская, пианистката Бела Давидович, танцьорката Мира Колцова.
 Последни изяви
 Въпреки постоянните си здравословни проблеми Михаил Тал продължава да бъде активен играч до смъртта си.
 Своята последна официална партия Тал изиграва вече тежко болен – на 5 май 1992 година на турнира в Барселона, в който той с 51⁄2 точки от 11 заема място в долната част на таблицата. Негов съперник е Владимир Акопян и тази партия Тал печели. На 28 май Тал заема 3-то място в шампионата на Москва по блиц (на първите две са Каспаров, когото Тал побеждава, и Бареев). Тал се подготвя да играе за независима Латвия на шахматната олимпиада в Манила, но не смогва да направи това поради влошеното си здраве. Почива на 28 юни 1992 г. на 55 години в 15-а болница в Москва. Като причина за смъртта са посочени „обилно кръвотечение и варикоза на вените на хранопровода“. Погребан е на еврейското гробище Шмерли в Рига.
 Избрани партии
 Михаил Тал – Роберт Фишер 1 – 0
 Турнир на претендентите за световната титла, Блед – Загреб – Белград, 20-и кръг, 11 октомври 1959.
 Chessgames.com нарича тази партия „Междузвездни войни“.
 Староиндийска защита: Вариант Петросян, Нормална защита (E93)
 1. d4 Kf6 2. c4 g6 3. Kc3 Og7 4. e4 d6 5. Oe2 O-O 6. Kf3 e5 7. d5 Kbd7 8. Og5 h6 9. Oh4 a6 10. O-O Дe8 11. Kd2 Kh7 12. b4 Of6 13. O:f6 Kh:f6 14. Kb3 Дe7 15. Дd2 Цh7 16. Дe3 Kg8 17. c5 f5!? 18. e:f5 g:f5?! 19. f4 e:f4 20. Д:f4 d:c5 21. Od3! c:b4 22. Tae1 Дf6 23. Te6!! (диаграма 1) Тал привидно жертва 2 фигури и пешка за топ, но създава матови заплахи. 23. ... Д:c3 24. O:f5+ T:f5 25. Д:f5+ Цh8 26. Tf3 Дb2 (26. ...Дg7? 27. Тg6! Дe5
 28. Дf7!! с неспасяем мат на g8 или g7) 27. Te8 Kf6 28. Д:f6+ Д:f6 29. T:f6 Цg7 30. Tff8 Ke7 31.Ka5! Привидно изолираният бял кон се включва необичайно бързо в атаката и решава играта. 31. ...h5 32. h4 Tb8 33. Kc4 b5 34. Ke5!! (диаграма 2) със заплаха 35. Tf7+ и черните губят една от двете фигури. Фишер се предава. 1 – 0
 Михаил Тал – Анатолий Kaрпoв 1 – 0
 Турнир SWIFT Блиц, Брюксел, 26 април 1987.
 Заради високото майсторство, с което Михаил Тал неусетно стига до матова позиция срещу световния ексшампион в Chessgames.com тази партия е наречена „Издърпване на заек от шапката“.
 Защита Каро-Кан: Ускорена атака Панов, Модерен вариант (B10)
 1. e4 c6 2. c4 d5 3. e:d5 c:d5 4. c:d5 Kf6 5. Kc3 K:d5 6. Kf3 K:c3 7. b:c3 g6 8. d4 Og7 9. Bd3 O-O 10. O-O Kc6 11. Te1 Te8 12. Og5 Oe6 13. T:e6 f:e6 14. Oc4 Дd6 15. Дe2 Kd8 16. Te1 Tc8 17. Kd2 Цh8 18. Ke4 Дc7 19. Ob3 e5 20. h4! (диаграма 1) Белите започват атака на царския фланг. 20. ... e:d4? Нужно беше да се спре пешката h4 чрез 20. ... h5. 21. h5! g:h5 22. Д:h5 Tf8 23. Oc2! С размяната на пешките Тал отслаби защитата на черния цар и бързо изнася всички фигури срещу него. 23. ... Дe5 24. Kg3!! Жертва на цял топ за едно темпо и завличане на черната дама. 24. ...Д:e1+ 25. Цh2 h6 26. O:h6 Цg8 27. O:g7 T:f2 28. Дh7+ Цf7 29. Дg6+ Цg8 30. Oh6+ (диаграма 4) и мат на следващия ход. Kaрпoв се предава. 1 – 0
 Използвана литература
 Биография на Михаил Тал от Chesscorner.com
 Биография на Михаил Тал от Biogs.com
 Източници
 Външни препратки
 Биография на Тал
 85 критични ситуации
 Съветски шахматисти
 Латвийски шахматисти
 Родени в Рига
 Починали в Москва
 Евреи в Русия
 Шахматни гросмайстори


type: contracts

jurisdiction: EU

text:
 Avis juridique important
 |
 21994A0517(20)
 Accordo tra la Comunità economica europea e l'Ucraina sul commercio dei prodotti tessili - Protocollo A - Protocollo B - Protocollo C - Note verbali - Verbali concordati - Scambio di note Traduzione non ufficiale
 Gazzetta ufficiale n. L 123 del 17/05/1994 pag. 0718 - 0744 edizione speciale finlandese: capitolo 11 tomo 31 pag. 0720 edizione speciale svedese/ capitolo 11 tomo 31 pag. 0720
 AGREEMENT between the European Economic Community and Ukraine on trade in textile productsTHE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,of the one part, andTHE GOVERNMENT OF UKRAINE,of the other part,DESIRING to promote, with a view to permanent cooperation and in conditions providing every security for trade, the orderly and equitable development of trade in textile products between the European Economic Community (hereinafter referred to as 'the Community') and Ukraine,RESOLVED to take the fullest possible account of the serious economic and social problems at present affecting the textile industry in both importing and exporting countries, and in particular, to eliminate real risks of market disruption on the market of the Community and real risks of disruption to the textile trade of Ukraine,HAVE DECIDED to conclude this Agreement and to this end have designated as their plenipotentiaries:THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,THE GOVERNMENT OF UKRAINE,WHO HAVE AGREED AS FOLLOWS:Article 11. Trade in textile products listed in Annex I and originating within the Contracting Parties shall be liberalized for the duration of this Agreement under the conditions set out therein.2. Subject to the provisions of this or any successive Agreement, the Community undertakes, in respect of the products listed in Annex I, to suspend the application of quantitative import restrictions currently in force and not to introduce new quantitative restrictions.Quantitative import restrictions shall be re-introduced in case of denunciation or non-replacement of the present Agreement.3. Measures having equivalent effect to quantitative restrictions on the importation into the Community of the products listed in Annex I shall be prohibited for the duration of this Agreement.Article 21. Ukraine agrees to establish and maintain for each calendar year quantitative limits on its exports to the Community in accordance with Annex II. Such exports shall be subject to a double-checking system as specified in Protocol A.2. In administering the quantitative limits referred to in paragraph 1, Ukraine shall ensure that the Community textile industry shall benefit from utilization of the said limits.More particularly, as regards categories 1, 2, 2a and 3, Ukraine undertakes upon request from the Community to reserve, as a priority, 50 % of the quantitative limits concerned for Community industry users during a period extending between 1 January to 31 May of each year. For this purpose, contracts made with the industry during the periods in question shall be taken into consideration.3. To facilitate the implementation of these provisions the Community shall provide the competent Ukrainian authorities, before the end of each year, with a list of interested Community manufacturers and processors and, if possible, of the quantity of products requested for each firm. To this end, the firms concerned are invited to make direct contact with the relevant Ukrainian enterprises as early as possible during the two reservation periods mentioned in paragraph 2, in order to make their purchasing intentions known.Article 31. Imports into the Community of textile products covered by this Agreement shall not be subject to the quantitative limits established in Annex II, provided that they are declared to be for re-export outside the Community in the same state or after processing, within the framework of the administrative system of control which exists within the Community.However, the release for home use of products imported into the Community under the conditions referred to above shall be subject to the production of an export licence issued by the authorities of Ukraine, and to proof of origin in accordance with the provisions of Protocol A.2. Where the Community authorities ascertain that imports of textile products have been set off against a quantitative limit established under this Agreement, but that the products have subsequently been re-exported outside the Community, the authorities shall inform the Ukrainian authorities within four weeks of the quantities involved and authorize imports of identical quantities of the same products, which shall not be set off against the quantitative limit established under this Agreement for the current or the following year, as appropriate.3. The Community and Ukraine recognize the special and differential character of re-imports of textile products into the Community after processing in Ukraine as a specific form of industrial and trade cooperation.Provided that they are effected in accordance with the regulations on economic outward processing in force in the Community, these re-imports are not subject to the quantitative limits set out in Annex II when they are subject to the specific arrangements laid down in Protocol C.Article 41. In any Agreement year advance use of a portion of the quantitative limit established for the following Agreement year is authorized for each category of products up to 5 % of the quantitative limit for the current Agreement year.Amounts delivered in advance shall be deducted from the corresponding quantitative limits established for the following Agreement year.2. Carry-over to the corresponding quantitative limit for the following Agreement year of the amounts not used during any Agreement year is authorized for each category of products up to 7 % of the quantitative limit for the current Agreement year.3. Transfers in respect of categories in Group I shall not be made from any category except as follows:- transfers between categories 2 and 3 and from category 1 to categories 2 and 3 may be made up to 4 % of the quantitative limits for the category to which the transfer is made,- transfers between categories 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 may be made up to 4 % of the quantitative limit for the category to which the transfer is made.Transfers into any category in Groups II, III, IV and V may be made from any category or categories in Groups I, II, III, IV and V up to 5 % of the quantitative limit for the category to which the transfer is made.4. The table of equivalence applicable to the transfers referred to above is given in Annex I to this Agreement.5. The increase in any category of products resulting from the cumulative application of the provisions in paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 above during an Agreement year shall not exceed the following limits:- 13 % for categories of products in Group I,- 13,5 % for categories of products in Groups II, III, IV and V.6. Prior notification shall be given by the Ukrainian authorities in the event of recourse to the provisions of paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 above, at least 15 days in advance.Article 51. Exports of textile products not listed in Annex II to this Agreement may be made subject to quantitative limits on the conditions laid down in the following paragraphs.2. Where the Community finds, under the system of administrative control set up, that the level of imports of products in a given category not listed in Annex II originating in Ukraine exceeds, in relation to the preceding year's total imports into the Community from all sources of products in that category, the following rates:- 1,2 % for categories of products in Group II,- 4 % for categories of products in Groups III, IV and V,it may request the opening of consultations in accordance with the procedure described in Article 15 of this Agreement, with a view to reaching agreement on an appropriate restraint level for the products in such category.3. Pending a mutually satisfactory solution, Ukraine undertakes, from the date of notification of the request for consultations, to suspend or limit at the level indicated by the Community exports of the category of products in question to the Community or to the region or regions of the Community market specified by the Community.The Community shall authorize the importation of products of the said category shipped from Ukraine before the date on which the request for consultations was submitted.4. Should the Contracting Parties be unable in the course of consultations to reach a satisfactory solution within the period specified in Article 15 (2), the Community shall have the right to introduce a definitive quantitative limit at an annual level not lower than the level resulting from the application of the formula set out in paragraph 2, or 106 % of the level of imports reached during the calendar year preceding that in which imports exceeded the level resulting from the application of the formula set out in paragraph 2 and gave rise to the request for consultations, whichever is the higher.The annual level so fixed shall be revised upwards after consultations in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 15, with a view to fulfilling the conditions set out in paragraph 2, should the trend of total imports into the Community of the product in question make this necessary.5. The limits introduced under paragraph 2 or 4 may in no case be lower than the level of imports of products in that category originating in Ukraine in 1992.6. The provisions of this Article shall not apply where the percentages specified in paragraph 2 have been reached as a result of a fall in total imports into the Community, and not as a result of an increase in exports of products originating in Ukraine.7. In the event of the provisions of paragraph 2, 3 or 4 being applied, Ukraine undertakes to issue export licences for products covered by contracts concluded before the introduction of the quantitative limit, up to the volume of the quantitative limit fixed.8. Up to the date of communication of the statistics referred to in Article 12 (6), the provisions of paragraph 2 of this Article shall apply on the basis of the annual statistics previously communicated by the Community.9. The provisions of this Agreement which concern exports of products subject to the quantitative limits established in Annex II shall also apply to products for which quantitative limits are introduced under this Article.Article 61. In view of ensuring the effective functioning of this Agreement, the Community and Ukraine agree to cooperate fully in order to prevent, to investigate and to take any necessary legal and/or administrative action against circumvention by transhipment, re-routing, false declaration concerning the country or place of origin, falsification of documents, false declaration concerning fibre content, quantities description or classification of merchandise any by whatever other means. Accordingly, Ukraine and the Community agree to establish the necessary legal provisions and administrative procedures permitting effective action to be taken against such circumvention, which shall include the adoption of legally binding corrective measures against exporters and/or importers involved.2. Should the Community believe on the basis of information available that the present Agreement is being circumvented, the Community will consult with Ukraine with a view to reaching a mutually satisfactory solution. These consultations will be held as early as possible and at the latest within 30 days from the date of request.3. Pending the results of the consultation referred to in paragraph 2, Ukraine shall, as a precautionary measure, if so requested by the Community, take all necessary measures to ensure that, where sufficient evidence of circumvention is provided, adjustments of quantitative limits liable to be agreed following the consultation referred to in paragraph 2, may be carried out for the quota year in which the request to open consultations in accordance with paragraph 2 was made, or for the following year if the quota for the current year is exhausted.4. Should the Parties be unable, in the course of the consultation referred to in paragraph 2 to reach a mutually satisfactory solution, the Community shall have the right:(a) where there is sufficient evidence that products originating in Ukraine have been imported in circumvention of the present Agreement, to set off the relevant quantities against the quantitative limits established under the Agreement;(b) where sufficient evidence shows that false declaration concerning fibre content, quantities, description or classification of products originating in Ukraine has occured, to refuse to import the products in question;(c) should it appear the territory of Ukraine is involved in transhipment or re-routing of products not originating in Ukraine, to introduce quantitative limits against the same products originating in Ukraine if they are not already subject to quantitative limits, or to take any other appropriate measures.5. The Parties agree to establish a system of administrative cooperation to prevent and to address effectively all problems arising from circumvention in accordance with the provisions of Protocol A to this Agreement.Article 71. The quantitative limits established under this Agreement on imports into the Community of textile products of Ukrainian origin will not be broken down by the Community into regional shares.2. The Parties shall cooperate in order to prevent sudden and prejudicial changes in traditional trade flows resulting in regional concentration of direct imports into the Community.3. Ukraine shall monitor its exports of products under restraint or surveillance into the Community. Should a sudden and prejudicial change in traditional trade flows arise, the Community will be entitled to request consultations in order to find a satisfactory solution to those problems. Such consultations must be held within 15 working days of their being requested by the Community.4. Ukraine shall endeavour to ensure that exports of textile products subject to quantitative limits into the Community are spaced out as evenly as possible over the year due account being taken in particular of seasonal factors.Article 8In the event of denunciation of this Agreement as provided for in Article 20 (3), the quantitative limits established in Annex II shall be reduced on a pro rata temporis basis unless the Contracting Parties decide otherwise by common agreement.Article 9Ukraine exports of cottage-industry fabrics woven on hand- or foot-operated looms, garments or other made-up articles obtained manually from such fabrics and of traditional folklore handicraft products shall not be subject to quantitative limits, provided that these products originating in Ukraine meet the conditions laid down in Protocol B.Article 101. Should the Community consider that a textile product covered by this Agreement is being imported into the Community from Ukraine at a price abnormally lower than the normal competitive level and is for this reason causing or threatening to cause serious injury to Community producers of like or directly competing products, it may request consultations under Article 15, and in that event the following specific provisions shall be applicable.2. If following such consultations it is acknowledged by common accord that the situation described in paragraph 1 exists, Ukraine shall take, within the limits of its powers, the necessary steps, notably as regards the price at which the product in question will be sold, to remedy the situation.3. In order to determine whether the price of a textile product is abnormally lower than the normal competitive level, it may be compared with:- the prices generally charged for like products sold under the ordinary conditions by other exporting countries on the market of the importing country,- the prices of like national products at a comparable marketing stage on the market of the importing country,- the lowest prices charged by a third country for the same product in the course of ordinary commercial dealings in the three months preceding the request for consultations, and not having led to the adoption of any measure by the Community.4. Should the consultations referred to in paragraph 2 above fail to lead to an agreement within 30 days of the Community's request for consultations, the Community may, until these consultations have produced a mutually satisfactory solution, temporarily refuse consignments of the product in question at prices under the conditions referred to in paragraph 1 above.5. In totally exceptional and critical circumstances, where consignments of products are being imported from Ukraine into the Community at prices abnormally lower than the normal competitive level, such as to cause injury which it would be difficult to repair, the Community may temporarily suspend imports of the products concerned pending agreement on a solution in the course of consultations, which shall be opened immediately. The Contracting Parties shall do their utmost to reach a mutually acceptable solution within 10 working days' notice of the opening of such consultations.6. Should the Community have recourse to the measures referred to in paragraphs 4 and 5 above, Ukraine may at any time request the opening of consultations to examine the possibility of eliminating or modifying these measures where the causes which made them necessary no longer exist.Article 111. The classification of the products covered by this Agreement is based on the tariff and statistical nomenclature of the Community (hereinafter called the 'combined nomenclature', or in abbreviated for 'CN') and any amendments thereof.Where any decision on classification results in a change of classification practice or a change of category of any product subject to this Agreement the affected products shall follow the trade regime applicable to the practice or category they fall into after such changes.Any amendment to the combined nomenclature (CN) made in accordance with the procedures in force in the Community concerning categories of products covered by this Agreement or any decision relating to the classification of goods shall not have the effect of reducing quantitative limits introduced pursuant to this Agreement.2. The origin of the products covered by this Agreement shall be determined in accordance with the rules in force in the Community.Any amendment to these rules of origin shall be communicated to Ukraine and shall not have the effect of reducing any quantitative limit established in Annex II.The procedures for control of the origin of the products referred to above are laid down in Protocol A.Article 121. Ukraine shall supply the Commission with precise statistical information on all export licences issued for categories of textile products subject to the quantitative limits set out in Annex II, expressed in quantities and in terms of value and broken down by Member States of the Community, as well as on all certificates issued by the competent Ukrainian authorities for products referred to in Article 9 and subject to the provisions of Protocol B.2. The Community shall likewise transmit to the Ukrainian authorities precise statistical information on import authorizations issued by the Community authorities and import statistics for products covered by the system referred to in Article 5 (2).3. The information referred to above shall, for all categories of products, be forwarded before the end of the month following the month to which the statistics relate.4. Upon request by the Community, Ukraine shall supply import statistics for all products covered by Annex I.5. Should it be found on analysis of the information exchanged that there are significant discrepancies between the returns for exports and those for imports, consultations may be initiated in accordance with the procedure specified in Article 15 of this Agreement.6. For the purpose of applying the provisions of Article 5, the Community undertakes to provide the Ukrainian authorities before 15 April of each year with the preceding year's statistics on imports of all textile products covered by this Agreement, broken down by supplying country and Community Member State.Article 131. Ukraine shall create favourable conditions for imports of textile products originating in the Community listed in Annex I and, where appropriate inter alia, accord to them non-discriminatory treatment as regards the application of quantitative restrictions, the granting of licences and the allocation of currency needed to pay for such imports. Ukraine will also recommend to its importers to use the possibilities offered by the Community producers of textiles mentioned above while according the highest possible degree of liberalization to those imports taking into account the development of trade between the Contracting Parties.2. Where a need for additional supplies arises and in particular a need leading to the diversification on imports of textile products in Ukraine, Ukraine shall accord non-discriminatory treatment to imports of textile products originating in the Community.Article 141. The Contracting Parties agree to examine the trend of trade in textile products and garments each year, in the framework of the consultations provided for in Article 15 and on the basis of the statistics referred to in Article 12.2. If the Community finds that in the cases foreseen in Article 13 (2) of this Agreement it is placed in an unfavourable position as compared with a third country, it may request consultations with Ukraine in accordance with the procedure specified in Article 15 with a view to taking appropriate action.Article 151. Save where it is otherwise provided for in this Agreement, the consultation procedures referred to in this Agreement other than those referred to in paragraph 2 of this Article, shall be governed by the following provisions:- as far as possible consultations shall be held periodically. Specific additional consultations may also be held,- any request for consultations shall be notified in writing to the other Contracting Party,- where appropriate, the request for consultations shall be followed within a reasonable period (and in any case not later than 15 days following the notification) by a report setting out the circumstances which, in the opinion of the requesting Party, justify the submission of such a request,- the Contracting Parties shall enter into consultations within one month of notification of the request at the latest, with a view to reaching agreement or a mutually acceptable conclusion within one further month at the latest,- the period of one month referred to above for the purpose of reaching agreement or a mutually acceptable conclusion may be extended by common accord.2. The Community may request consultations in accordance with paragraph 1 when it ascertains that during a particular year of application of the Agreement difficulties arise in the Community or one of its regions due to a sharp and substantial increase, by comparison to the preceding year, in imports of a given category of Group I subject to the quantitative limits set out in Annex II.3. At the request of either of the Contracting Parties, consultations shall be held on any problems arising from the application of this Agreement. Any consultations held under this Article shall take place in a spirit of cooperation and with a desire to reconcile the differences between the Contracting Parties.Article 16The Contracting Parties undertake to promote the exchange of visits by persons, groups and delegations from business, trade and industry, to facilitate contacts in the industrial, commercial and technical fields connected with trade and cooperation in textile industry and textile products and garments, and to assist in the organization of fairs and exhibitions of mutual interest.Article 171. Ukraine is prepared to cooperate fully and if necessary to take, within the framework of its trade policy and within the limits of its powers, measures to prevent the disruption of the trade for certain raw materials listed in Annex III.2. Taking into account its production and export possibilities, Ukraine in administrating exports of the products referred to in paragraph 1, shall give whenever possible favourable treatment, on a non-discriminatory basis, to the abovementioned products, requested by the Community with a view to meeting its needs.3. Problems arising in this area may be subject to the consultations provided for in Article 15.Article 18As regards intellectual property, at the request of either Contracting Party, consultations shall be held in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 15 with a view to finding an equitable solution to problems relating to the protection of marks, designs or models of articles of apparel and textile products.Article 19This Agreement shall apply, on the one hand, to the territories in which the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community is applied and under the conditions laid down in that Treaty and, on the other hand, to the territory of Ukraine.Article 201. This Agreement shall enter into force on the first day of the month following the date on which the Parties notify each other of the completion of the procedures necessary for that purpose. It shall be applicable until 31 December 1994. Thereafter, the application of all the provisions of this Agreement shall be extended automatically for a period of one more year up to 31 December 1995, unless either Party notifies the other at least six months before 31 December 1994 that it does not agree with this extension.2. This Agreement shall apply with effect from 1 January 1993.3. Either Contracting Party may at any time propose modifications to this Agreement or denounce it, provided that at least six months' notice is given. In that event, the Agreement shall come to an end on the expiry of the period of notice.4. The Contracting Parties agree to enter into consultations not later than six months before the expiration of the present Agreement with a view to possibly concluding a new Agreement.5. The Annexes, Protocols, Agreed Minutes and letters exchanged or attached to this Agreement, shall form an integral part thereof.Article 21This Agreement shall be drawn up in two copies in the Danish, Dutch, English, French, German, Greek, Italian, Portuguese, Spanish und Ukrainian languages, each of these texts being equally authentic.For the Government of UkraineFor the Council of the European CommunitiesANNEX I (The contents of this Annex I are identical to those of pages 9 to 41) ANNEX II (The full products descriptions of the categories listed in this Annex are to be found in Annex I to the Agreement) >SPAZIO PER TABELLA>ANNEX III Raw materials referred to in Article 17 AngoraCashmereCottonSilk and silk wastePROTOCOL A TITLE I CLASSIFICATION Article 11. The competent authorities of the Community undertake to inform Ukraine of any changes in the combined nomenclature (CN) before the date of their entry into force in the Community.2. The competent authorities of the Community undertake to inform the competent authorities of Ukraine of any decisions relating to the classification of products subject to the present Agreement, within one month of their adoption at the latest. Such communication shall include:(a) a description of the products concerned;(b) the relevant category and the related CN codes;(c) the reasons which have led to the decision.3. Where a decision on classification results in a change of classification practice or a change of category of any product subject to the Agreement, the competent authorities of the Community shall provide 30 days' notice, from the date of the Community's communication, before the decision is put into effect. Products shipped before the date of entry into effect of the decision shall remain subject to the earlier classification practice, provided that the goods in the question are presented for importation into the Community within 60 days of that date.4. Where a Community decision on classification resulting in a change of classification practice or a change of categorization of any product subject to the Agreement affects a category subject to quantitative limits, the Contracting Parties agree to enter into consultation in accordance with the procedures described in Article 15 of the Agreement with a view to honouring the obligation under the second subparagraph of Article 11 (1) of the Agreement.5. In case of divergent opinions between Ukraine and the competent Community authorities at the point of entry into the Community on the classification of products covered by the present Agreement, classification shall provisionally be based on indications provided by the Community, pending consultations in accordance with Article 15 with a view to reaching agreement on definitive classification of the product concerned.TITLE II ORIGIN Article 21. Products originating in Ukraine for export to the Community in accordance with the arrangements established by this Agreement shall be accompanied by a certificate of Ukrainian origin conforming to the model annexed to this Protocol.2. The certificate of origin shall be certified by the competent Ukrainian organizations authorized under the Ukrainian legislation if the products in question can be considered products originating in that country within the meaning of the relevant rules in force in the Community.3. However, the products in Group III, IV and V may be imported into the Community in accordance with the arrangements established by this Agreement on production of a declaration by the exporter on the invoice or other commercial document relating to the products to the effect that the products in question originate in Ukraine within the meaning of the relevant rules n force in the Community.4. The certificate of origin referred to in paragraph 1 shall not be required for import of goods covered by a certificate of origin Form A or Form APR completed in accordance with the relevant Community rules in order to qualify for generalized tariff preferences.Article 3The certificate of origin shall be issued only on application having been made in writing by the exporter or, under the exporter's responsibility, by his authorized representative. The competent Ukrainian organizations authorized under Ukrainian legislation shall ensure that the certificate of origin is properly completed and for this purpose they shall call for any necessary documentary evidence or carry out any check which they consider appropriate.Article 4Where different criteria for determining origin are laid down for products falling within the same category, the certificates or declarations of origin must contain a sufficiently detailed description of the goods so as to enable Ukrainian criterion to be determined, on the basis of which the certificate was issued or the declaration drawn up.Article 5The discovery of slight discrepancies between the statements made in the certificate of origin and those made in the documents produced to the customs office for the purpose of carrying out the formalities for importing the products shall not ipso facto cast doubt upon the statements in the certificate.TITLE III DOUBLE-CHECKING SYSTEM FOR THE CATEGORIES OF PRODUCTS SUBJECT TO COMMUNITY QUANTITATIVE LIMITS Section I Exportation Article 61. The competent authorities of Ukraine shall issue an export licence in respect of all consignments from Ukraine of textile products referred to in Annex II, up to the relevant quantitative limits as may be modified by Articles 3, 4 and 6 of this Agreement, as well as of textile products subject to any definitive or provisional quantitative limits, established as a result of the application of Article 5 of the Agreement.Article 71. The export licence shall conform to the model annexed to this Protocol and it shall be valid for exports throughout the customs territory to which the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community applies. However, where the Community has made recourse to the provisions of Articles 5 and 7 of the Agreement in accordance with the provisions of the Agreed Minute No 1, or to the Agreed Minute No 2, the textile products covered by the export licences can only be put into free circulation in the region(s) of the Community indicated in those licences.2. Each export licence must certify inter alia that the quantity of the product in question has been set off against the quantitative limit established for the category of the products concerned and shall only cover one category of products subject to quantitative limits. It may be used for one or more consignments of the products in question.Article 8The competent authorities of the Community must be informed immediately of the withdrawal or modification of any export licence already issued.Article 91. Exports shall be set off against the quantitative limits established for the year in which the shipment of the goods has been effected even if the export licence is issued after such shipment.2. For the purpose of applying paragraph 1, shipment of the goods is considered to have taken place on the date of their loading onto the exporting aircraft, vehicule or vessel.Article 10The presentation of an export licence, in application of Article 12 hereafter, shall be effected not later than 31 March of the year following that in which the goods covered by the licence have been shipped.Section II Importation Article 11Importation into the Community of textile products subject to quantitative limits shall be subject to the presentation of an import authorization.Article 121. The competent authorities of the Community shall issue the import authorization referred to in Article 11 above, within five working days of the presentation by the importer of the original of the corresponding export licence.2. The import authorizations shall be valid for six months from the date of their issue for imports throughout the customs territory to which the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community is applied. However, where the Community has recourse to the provisions of Articles 5 and 7 of the Agreement in accordance with the provisions of the Agreed Minute No 1, or to the Agreed Minute No 2, the products covered by the import licences can only be put into free circulation in the region(s) of the Community indicated in those licences.3. The competent authorities of the Community shall cancel the import authorization already issued whenever the corresponding export licence has been withdrawn.However, if the competent authorities of the Community are notified of the withdrawal or the cancellation of the export licence only after the importation of the products into the Community, the relevant quantities shall be set off against the quantitative limits established for the category and the quota year concerned.Article 131. If the competent authorities of the Community find that the total quantities covered by export licences issued by the competent authorities of Ukraine for a particular category in any year exceed the quantitative limit established for that category established in Annex II for that category as may be notified by Articles 3,4 and 6 of the Agreement, or any quantitative limit established in accordance with Article 5 of the Agreement, the said authorities may suspend the further issue of import authorizations. In this event, the competent authorities of the Community shall immediately inform the authorities of Ukraine and the special consultation procedure set out in Article 15 of the Agreement shall be initiated forthwith.2. Exports of products of Ukrainian origin subject to quantitative limits or a double-checking system and not covered by Ukrainian export licences issued in accordance with the provisions of this Protocol may be refused an import authorization by the competent Community authorities.However, without prejudice to Article 6 of the Agreement if the import of such products is allowed into the Community by the competent authorities of the Community, the quantities involved shall not be set off against the appropriate quantitative limits established in Annex II, or established by virtue of Article 5 of the Agreement, without the express agreement of the competent authorities of Ukraine.TITLE IV FORM AND PRODUCTION OF EXPORT CERTIFICATES AND CERTIFICATES OF ORIGIN, AND COMMON PROVISIONS CONCERNING EXPORTS TO THE COMMUNITY Article 141. The export licence and the certificate of origin may comprise additional copies duly indicated as such. They shall be made out in English or French. If they are completed by hand, entries must be in ink and in printed script.These documents shall measure 210 × 297 mm. The paper used shall be white writing paper, sized, not containing mechanical pulp, and weighing not less than 25 g/m2. If the documents have several copies only the top copy, which is the original, shall be printed with the guilloche pattern background. This copy shall be clearly marked as 'original' and the other copies as 'copies'. Only the original shall be accepted by the competent authorities of the Community as being valid for the purpose of export to the Community in accordance with the provision of the Agreement.2. Each document shall bear a standardized serial number, whether or not printed, by which it can be identified.This number shall be composed of the following elements:- two letters identifying the exporting country as follows: UA,- two letters identifying the intended Member State of customs clearance as follows:BL = Benelux,DE = Federal Republic of Germany,DK = Denmark,EL = Greece,ES = Spain,FR = France,GB = United Kingdom,IE = Ireland,IT = Italy,PT = Portugal,- a one-digit number identifying quota year, corresponding to the last figure in the respective year, e.g. 3 for 1993,- a two-digit number from 01 to 99, identifying the particular issuing office concerned in the exporting country,- a five-digit number running consecutively from 00001 to 99999 allocated to the intended Member State of customs clearance.Article 15The export licence and the certificate of origin may be issued after the shipment of the products to which they relate. In such cases they must bear the endorsement 'délivré a posteriori' or the endorsement 'issued retrospectively'.Article 161. In the event of a theft, loss or destruction of an export licence or a certificate of origin, the exporter may apply to the competent Ukrainian authorities which issued the document for a duplicate to be made out on the basis of the export documents in his possession. The duplicate of any such certificate or licence so issued shall bear the endorsement 'duplicata' or 'duplicate'.2. The duplicate shall bear the date of the original export licence or certificate of origin.TITLE V ADMINISTRATIVE COOPERATION Article 17The Community and Ukraine shall cooperate closely in the implementation of the provisions of this Protocol. To this end, contacts and exchanges or views, including on technical matters, shall be facilitated by both Parties.Article 18In order to ensure the correct application of this Protocol, the Community and Ukraine offer mutual assistance for the checking of the authenticity and the accuracy of export licences and certificates of origin issued or of any declarations made within the terms of this Protocol.Article 19Ukraine shall send the Commission of the European Communities the names and addresses of the authorities to issue and verify the export licences and the certificates of origin, together with specimens of the stamps used by these authorities and specimen signatures of officials responsible for signing the export licences and the certificates of origin. Ukraine shall also notify the Commission of any change in this information.Article 201. Subsequent verification of certificates of origin or export licences shall be carried out at random, or whenever the competent Community authorities have reasonable doubt as to the authenticity of the certificate or licence or as to the accuracy of the information regarding the true origin of the products in question.2. In such cases, the competent authorities in the Community shall return the certificate of origin or the export licence or a copy thereof to the competent Ukrainian authorities, giving, where appropriate, the reasons of form or substance which justify an enquiry. If the invoice has been submitted, such invoice or a copy thereof shall be attached to the certificate or to the licence or their copies. The authorities shall also forward any information that has been obtained suggesting that the particulars given on the said certificate or licence are inaccurate.3. The provisions of paragraph 1 above shall also apply to subsequent verifications of the declarations of origin provided for in Article 2 of this Protocol.4. The results of the subsequent verifications carried out in accordance with paragraphs 1 and 2 above shall be communicated to the competent authorities of the Community within three months at the latest. The information communicated shall indicate whether the disputed certificate, licence or declaration, applies to the goods actually exported and whether these goods are eligible for export under the arrangements established by the Agreement. The information shall also include, at the request of the Community, copies of all the documentation necessary to fully determine the facts, and in particular the true origin of the goods.Should such verifications reveal systematic irregularities in the use of declarations of origin, the Community may subject imports of the products in question to the provisions of Article 2 (1) of this Protocol.5. For the purpose of subsequent verification of certificates of origin, copies of the certificates as well as any export documents referring to them shall be kept for at least two years by the competent Ukrainian authorities.6. Recourse to the random verification procedure specified in this Article must not constitute an obstacle to the release for home use of the products in question.Article 211. Where the verification procedure referred to in Article 20 or where information available to the competent authorities of the Community or of Ukraine indicates or appears to indicate that the provisions of this Agreement are being circumvented or infringed, the two Contracting Parties shall cooperate closely and with the appropriate urgency in order to prevent any such circumvention or infringement.2. To this end, the competent authorities of Ukraine shall, on their own initiative or at the request of the Community, carry out appropriate inquiries, or arrange for such inquiries to be carried out, concerning operations which are, or appear to the Community to be, in circumvention or infringement of this Protocol. Ukraine shall communicate the results, of these inquiries to the Community, including any other pertinent information enabling the cause of the circumvention or infringement, including the true origin of the goods to be determined.3. By agreement between the Community and Ukraine, officials designated by the Community may be present at the inquiries referred to in paragraph 2 above.4. Pursuant to the cooperation referred to in paragraph 1 above, the competent authorities of the Community and Ukraine shall exchange any information considered by either Contracting Party to be of use in preventing circumvention or infringement of the provisions of this Agreement. These exchanges may include information on the production of textile products in Ukraine and on the trade in the type of products covered by this Agreement between Ukraine and third countries, particularly where the Community has reasonable grounds to consider that the products in question may be in transit across the territory of Ukraine prior to their importation into the Community. This information may include at the request of the Community copies of all available relevant documentation.5. Where sufficient evidence shows that the provisions of this Protocol have been circumvented or infringed, the competent authorities of Ukraine and the Community may agree to take the measures set out in Article 6 (4) of the Agreement, and any other measures as are necessary to prevent a recurrence of such circumvention or infringement.Annex to Protocol A, Article 2 (1) >RIFERIMENTO A UN FILM>Annex to Protocol A, Article 7 (1): Model 1 >RIFERIMENTO A UN FILM>PROTOCOL B referred to in Article 9 Cottage industry and folklore products originating in Ukraine1. The exemption provided for in Article 9 in respect of cottage industry products shall apply to the following types of product only:(a) fabrics woven on looms operated solely by hand or foot, being fabrics of a kind traditionally made in the cottage industry of Ukraine;(b) garments or other textile articles of a kind traditionally made in the cottage industry of Ukraine obtained manually from the fabrics referred to above and sewn exclusively by hand without the aid of any machine;(c) traditional folklore products of Ukraine made by hand, in a list to be agreed between the Community and Ukraine.Exemption shall be granted in respect only of products covered by a certificate conforming to the specimen attached to this Protocol and issued by the competent authorities in Ukraine. These certificates must indicate the reasons justifying their issuance; the competent authorities of the Community will accept them after having checked that the products concerned have fulfilled the conditions established in this Protocol. The certificates concerning the products envisaged in (c) above must bear a stamp 'FOLKLORE' marked clearly. In the case of a difference of opinion between the Parties concerning the nature of these products, consultations shall be held within one month in order to resolve these differences.Should imports of any product covered by this Protocol reach proportions liable to cause problems within the Community, consultations with Ukraine shall be initiated as soon as possible, with a view to resolving the situation by the adoption if necessary of a quantitative limit, in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 15 of this Agreement.2. The provisions of Titles IV and V of Protocol A shall apply mutatis mutandis to the products covered by paragraph 1 of this Protocol.Annex to Protocol B >RIFERIMENTO A UN FILM>PROTOCOL C Reimports into the Community, within the meaning of Article 3 (3) of this Agreement, of products listed in the Annex to this Protocol shall be subject to the provisions of this Agreement, unless the special provisions below provide otherwise:1. Subject to paragraph 2, only reimports into the Community of products affected by the specific quantitative limits laid down in the Annex to this Protocol shall be considered reimports within the meaning of Article 3 (3) of the Agreement.2. Reimports not covered by the Annex to this Protocol may be made subject to specific quantitative limits following consultations in accordance with the procedures set out in Article 15 of the Agreement, provided the products concerned are subject to quantitative limits pursuant to the Agreement, to a double-checking system or to surveillance measures.3. Having regard to the interests of both Parties, the Community may at its discretion, or in response to a request under Article 15 of the Agreement:(a) examine the possibility of transferring from one category to another, using in advance or carrying over from one year to the next, portions of specific quantitative limits;(b) consider the possibility of increasing specific quantitative limits.4. However, the Community may apply automatically the flexibility rules set out in paragraph 3 above within the following limits:(a) transfers between categories may not exceed 20 % the quantity for the category to which the transfer is made;(b) carry-over of a specific quantitative limit from one year to the next may not exceed 10,5 % of the quantity set for the year of actual utilization;(c) advance use of specific quantitative limits from one year to another may not exceed 7,5 % of the quantity set for the year of actual utilization.5. The Community shall inform Ukraine of any measures taken pursuant to the preceding paragraphs.6. The competent authorities in the Community shall debit the specific quantitative limits referred to in paragraph 1 at the time of issue of the prior authorization required by Council Regulation (EEC) No 636/82 which governs economic outward processing arrangements. A specific quantitative limit shall be debited for the year in which a prior authorization is issued.7. A certificate of origin made out by the organizations authorized to do so under Ukrainian law shall be issued, in accordance with Protocol A to the Agreement, for all products covered by this Protocol. This certificate shall bear a reference to the prior authorization mentioned in paragraph 6 above as evidence that the processing operation it describes has been carried out in Ukraine.8. The Community shall provide Ukraine with the names and addresses of, and specimens of the stamps used by, the competent authorities of the Community which issue the prior authorizations referred to in paragraph 6 above.9. Without prejudice to the provisions of paragraphs 1 to 8 above, Ukraine and the Community shall continue consultations with a view to seek a mutually acceptable solution enabling both Contracting Parties to benefit from the Agreement's provisions on outward processing traffic and so ensure the effective development of trade in textile products between Ukraine and the Community.Annex to Protocol C (The product descriptions of the categories listed in this Annex are to be found in Annex I to the Agreement) OPT QUOTAS >SPAZIO PER TABELLA>Agreed Minute No 1 In the context of the Agreement between the European Economic Community and Ukraine on trade in textile and clothing products, initialled on 5 May 1993, the Parties agreed that Article 5 of the Agreement does not preclude the Community, if the conditions are fulfilled, from applying the safeguard measures for one or more of its regions in conformity with the principles of the internal market.In such an event, Ukraine shall be informed in advance of the relevant provisions of Protocol A to the Agreement to be applied, as appropriate.For the Government of UkraineFor the Council of the European CommunitiesAgreed Minute No 2 Nothwithstanding Article 7 (1) of this Agreement, for imperative technical or administrative reasons or to find a solution to economic problems resulting from regional concentration of imports, or in order to combat circumvention and fraud of the provisions of this Agreement, the Community will establish for a limited period of time a specific management system in conformity with the principles of the internal market.However, if the Parties are unable to reach a satisfactory solution during the consultations provided for in Article 7 (3), Ukraine undertakes, if so requested by the Community, to respect temporary export limits for one or more regions of the Community. In such a case, these limits shall not preclude the importation into the region(s) concerned of products which were shipped from Ukraine on the basis of export licences obtained before the date of formal notification to Ukraine by the Community about the introduction of the above limits.The Community shall inform Ukraine of the technical and administrative measures, such as defined in the attached note verbale, that need to be introduced by both Parties in order to implement the above paragraphs in conformity with the principles of the internal market.For the Government of UkraineFor the Council of the European CommunitiesNote verbale The Direcotrate-General for External Relations of the Commission of the European Communities presents its compliments to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Ukraine and has the honour to refer to the Agreement on textile products negotiated between Ukraine and the Community initialled on 5 May 1993.The Directorate-General wishes to inform the Ministry, that the Community has decided to apply, starting from 1 January 1993, the provisions of paragraph 1 of Agreed Minute No 2 to the Agreement, initialled on 5 May 1993. Consequently, the corresponding provisions of Articles 7 and 12 of Protocol A to the Agreement shall also be applied as of the above date.The Directorate-General for External Relations avails itself of this opportunity to renew to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Ukraine the assurance of its highest consideration.Agreed Minute No 3 In the context of the Agreement between the European Economic Community and Ukraine on trade in textile and clothing products, initialled on 5 May 1993, the Parties agreed that Ukraine shall endeavour not to deprive certain regions of the Community which have traditionally had relatively small shares of Community quotas of imports of products serving as inputs for their processing industry.The Community and Ukraine further agreed to hold consultations, should the need arise, in order to avert any problems which might occur in this respect.For the Government of UkraineFor the Council of the European CommunitiesAgreed Minute No 4 In the context of the Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Ukraine on trade in textile and clothing products, initialled on 5 May 1993, Ukraine agreed that, from the date of request for and pending the consultations referred to in Article 7 (3), it shall cooperate by not issuing export licences that would further aggravate the problems resulting from the regional concentration of direct imports into the Community.For the Government of UkraineFor the Council of the European CommunitiesExchange of notes The Directorate-General for External Relations of the Commission of the European Communities presents its compliments to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Ukraine and has the honour to refer to the Agreement on textile products between Ukraine and the Community initialled on 5 May 1993.The Directorate-General wishes to inform the Ministry that whilst awaiting the completion of the necessary procedures for the conclusion and the coming into force of the Agreement, the Community is prepared to allow the provisions of the Agreement to apply de facto from 1 January 1993. This is on the understanding that either Party may at any time terminate this de facto application of the Agreement provided that 120 days' notice is given.The Directorate-General for External Relations would be grateful if the Mission would confirm its Agreement to the foregoing.The Directorate-General for External Relations avails itself of this opportunity to renew to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Ukraine the assurance of its highest consideration.Exchange of notes The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Ukraine presents its compliments to the Directorate-General for External Relations of the Commission of the European Communities and has the honour to refer to the Agreement on textile products between the Community and Ukraine initialled at Brussels on 5 May 1993.The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Ukraine wishes to confirm to the Directorate-General that whilst awaiting the completion of the necessary procedures for the conclusion and the coming into force of the Agreement, the Government of Ukraine is prepared to allow the provisions of the Agreement to apply de facto from 1 January 1993. This is on the understanding that either Party may at any time terminate this de facto application of the Agreement provided that 120 days' notice is given.The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Ukraine avails itself of this opportunity to renew to the Directorate-General for External Relations of the Commission of the European Communities the assurance of its highest consideration.Agreed Minute No 5 In the context of the Agreement between the European Economic Community and Ukraine on trade in textile products initialled on 5 May 1993, the Parties agreed that, in conformity with Article 20 (2) of the Agreement, the quantities of products originating in Ukraine shipped during the year 1993 and falling within one of the categories of textile products subject to the quantitative limits referred to in Article 2 (1) of the Agreement shall be set off against the quantitative limits established for the year 1993 for the category concerned.For the Government of UkraineFor the Council of the European CommunitiesAgreed Minute No 6 In the context of the Agreement between the European Economic Community and Ukraine on trade in textile products initialled on 5 May 1993, the Parties agreed that, in conformity with Article 20 (2) of the Agreement, products listed in Annex I to the Agreement originating in Ukraine but not subject to the quantitative limits referred to in Article 2 (1) of the Agreement may be subject either to the double-checking system specified in Protocol A to the Agreement or to a prior system of surveillance.For the Government of UkraineFor the Council of the European Communities


type: caselaw

text:
 23.7.2005
 ET
 Euroopa Liidu Teataja
 C 182/15
 EUROOPA KOHTU OTSUS
 (kuues koda)
 2. juuni 2005. aasta
 kohtuasjas C-68/04: Euroopa Ühenduste Komisjon versus Kreeka Vabariik (1)
 (Liikmesriigi kohustuste rikkumine - Direktiiv 2001/81/EÜ - Õhusaasteained - Heitkoguste siseriiklikud ülemmäärad)
 (2005/C 182/28)
 Kohtumenetluse keel: kreeka
 Kohtuasjas C-68/04: Euroopa Ühenduste Komisjon (esindajad G. Valero Jordana ja M. Konstantinidis), v. Kreeka Vabariik (esindaja N. Dafniou), mille esemeks on EÜ artikli 226 alusel 13. veebruaril 2004 esitatud liikmesriigi kohustuste rikkumise hagi, tegi Euroopa Kohus (kuues koda), koosseisus: koja esimees A. Borg Barthet (ettekandja) ning kohtunikud A. La Pergola ja A. Ó Caoimh; kohtujurist D. Ruiz-Jarabo Colomer, kohtusekretär R. Grass, 2. juunil 2005 otsuse, mille resolutiivosa on järgmine:
 1.
 Kuna Kreeka Vabariik ei ole vastu võtnud õigus- ja haldusnorme Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu 23. oktoobri 2001. aasta direktiivi 2001/81/EÜ teatavate õhusaasteainete siseriiklike ülemmäärade kohta täitmiseks, on Kreeka Vabariik rikkunud selle direktiivi artikli 15 lõikest 1 tulenevaid kohustusi.
 2.
 Mõista kohtukulud välja Kreeka Vabariigilt.
 (1) ELT C 94, 17.4.2004.


text:
11 . 7. 75 Journal officiel des Communautés européennes N° . L .181 /33
 ACCORD
 entre la Communauté économique européenne et le Programme alimentaire
 mondial relatif à la fourniture de céréales au bénéfice de pays en voie de
 développement à titre d'aide alimentaire
 LE CONSEIL DES COMMUNAUTÉS EUROPÉENNES,
 d'une part,
 LE PROGRAMME ALIMENTAIRE MONDIAL,
 programme entrepris conjointement par l'Organisation des Nations unies et l'Organisation des
 Nations unies pour l'alimentation et l'agriculture,
 d'autre part,
 considérant que le but du Programme alimentaire mondial est d'utiliser les contributions reçues dans
 le cadre du programme afin de faire face à des besoins alimentaires d'urgence et de réaliser des
 projets comportant l'utilisation de denrées alimentaires à des fins de développement économique et
 social ;
 considérant que, dans la Communauté économique européenne, il existe des stocks de céréales ; que,
 pour contribuer à la réalisation des objectifs du Programme alimentaire mondial, la Communauté a
 décidé de mettre à la disposition de celui-ci une certaine quantité dé ce produit,
 ONT DÉCIDÉ de conclure le présent accord et ont désigné à cet effet comme plénipotentiaires :
 LE CONSEIL DES COMMUNAUTÉS EUROPÉENNES :
 LE PROGRAMME ALIMENTAIRE MONDIAL :
 LESQUELS SONT CONVENUS DES DISPOSITIONS QUI SUIVENT :
 Article I Article III '
 Dans le cadre de son programme d'aide alimentaire Les livraisons sont effectuées fob, selon les modalités
 ;n céréales pour l'année 1973/ 1974, la Communauté prévues à l'annexe, qui fait partie intégrante du
 économique européenne, ci-après dénommée présent accord, ou à un stade correspondant, selon les
 < Communauté », fournit, à titre de don, au modalités à déterminer.
 Programme alimentaire mondial, ci-après dénommé
 : organisme destinataire », au bénéfice des pays en
 /oie de développement, une quantité de produits équi Article IV
 valant à 30 000 tonnes de céréales brutes.
 1. L'organisme destinataire s'engage à prendre
 toutes les dispositions nécessaires pour le transport et
 Article II l'assurance du produit depuis le point de livraison
 jusqu'au lieu de destination, ainsi que pour en effec
 ^es 30 000 tonnes de céréales brutes sont fournies en tuer la distribution .
 'état ou sous forme de produits de première transfor
 nation en fonction des demandes de l'organisme desti 2. La Communauté accorde à l'organisme destina
 îataire, agréées par la Communauté. Les livraisons taire une contribution aux frais visés au paragraphe 1 ,
 ont effectuées en vrac ou en sacs de jute ou de coton d'un montant de 16 unités de compte pour - chaque
 îeufs, d'une contenance de 50 kilogrammes net, selon tonne de céréales brutes ou pour l'équivalent de
 es besoins des projets. produits de première transformation . Cette contribu
 ---pagebreak--- N» L 181 /34 Journal officiel des Communautés européennes 11 . 7. 75
 tion est versée, pour chaque prise en charge du du produit déchargé et observations éventuelles sur
 produit par l'organisme destinataire, 30 jours après la qualité ; date à laquelle le déchargement a été
 réception, par la Communauté, de la lettre de prise en achevé ;
 charge visée à l'article 10 de l'annexe.
 — périodiquement, jusqu'à épuisement des quantités
 reçues à titre d'aide :, information spécifiant l'état
 Article V
 d'avancement des projets pour lesquels l'aide aura
 L'organisme destinataire s'engage à utiliser le produit été fournie, notamment quantités distribuées,
 reçu à titre d'aide pour la réalisation d'actions nombre et qualité de§ bénéficiaires, lieux, rythme
 et mode de distribution .
 d'urgence et de projets de développement écono
 mique et social et d'assistance alimentaire, agréés au
 préalable par la Communauté; Article VII
 À la demande de l'une d'entre elles, les parties contrac
 Article VI tantes se consultent sur toutes les questions concer
 L'organisme destinataire s'engage à informer la nant l'application du présent accord.
 Communauté, des conditions d'exécution du présent
 accord. À cette fin, il communique les données Article VIII
 suivantes à la Commission des Communautés euro
 péennes : Le présent accord est rédigé en double exemplaire en
 langues ' allemande, anglaise, danoise, française,
 — dans un délai raisonnable après le déchargement : italienne, néerlandaise et espagnole, chacun de ces
 port et date d'arrivée du navire ; nature et quantité textes faisant foi .
 ANNEXE
 MODALITÉS DE LIVRAISON ET DE PRISE EN CHARGE
 CHAPITRE PREMIER aux bateaux de haute mer et utilisés pour 1 affrètement inter
 national peuvent être indiqués. L'organisme destinataire
 désigne, pour chaque port d'embarquement, un mandataire,
 Dispositions generales dont il fait connaître, dans les meilleurs délais et, si possible,
 avant la désignation du .mandataire de la Communauté, le
 nom et l'adresse à la Communauté .
 Article premier
 La livraison se trouve effectuée et les risques passent de la Article 4
 Communauté à l'organisme destinataire au moment où la
 marchandise est déposée au point d'exportation désigné par Préalablement à la mise en œuvre de la procédure de désigna
 la Commission des Communautés européennes, à l'emplace tion du mandataire de la Communauté visé à l'article 3, la
 ment indiqué par l'organisme destinataire, ou par son manda Commission des Communautés européennes et l'organisme
 taire visé à l'article" 3, et dans les conditions visées à la destinataire fixent d'un commun accord la période au cours
 présente annexe. Sans préjudice des articles 8 et 9, les frais de laquelle doit commencer la livraison.
 sont supportés par la Communauté jusqu'à la livraison et par
 l'organisme destinataire au-delà de la livraison .
 CHAPITRE II
 Article 2
 À la livraison de la 'marchandise, il est admis une tolérance Obligations de la. Communauté
 de 5 % en moins de la quantité prévue à l'article I de
 l'accord.
 Article 5
 Article 3 Lorsque la Communauté n'est pas en mesure d'effectuer la
 livraison à la date et, le cas échéant, à la cadence prévues à
 Pour 1 exécution des dispositions de la présente annexe, la l'article 7, tous les frais éventuels qui en résultent pour l'orga
 Communauté désigne, éventuellement pour chaque lot, un nisme destinataire, par exemple les surestaries, le. faux fret et
 mandataire, dont elle fait connaître, dès qu'il est désigné, le le fret sur le vide, sont à la charge de la Communauté, pour
 nom et l'adresse à l'organisme destinataire ainsi que le ou les autant que ces frais correspondent aux frais normalement
 ports d'embarquement. Seuls des ports maritimes accessibles pratiqués.
 ---pagebreak--- 11 . 7. 75 Journal officiel des Communautés européennes N0 L 181 /35
 Article 6 Dans ce cas, les mandataires des .deux parties peuvent
 convenir d'une nouvelle date pour le début de la livraison et,
 Lorsque la Communauté est dans l'impossibilité de fournir la le cas échéant, d'une nouvelle cadence. Sauf cas de force
 totalité ou une partie de la marchandise à la date et dans les majeure, les frais résultant du retard du chargement sont à la
 délais prévus à l'article 7, elle en informe l'organisme destina charge de l'organisme destinataire.
 taire par écrit dès que possible, et au plus tard dans les 8
 jours ; les mandataires des deux parties conviennent alors, Si la nouvelle date est postérieure de plus de 30 jours francs à
 sans préjudice de l'article 5, d'une nouvelle date et d'un la date de chargement prévue à l'article 7 premier alinéa, la
 nouveau délai de livraison . Communauté peut disposer de la marchandise sans préjudice
 de l'engagement prévu à l'article I de l'accord.
 CHAPITRE III Article 9
 Lorsque la quantité prévue pour être chargée sur un navire
 Obligations de l'organisme destinataire ne peut être totalement mise à bord, l'organisme destinataire
 fait savoir à la Communauté, le plus tôt possible "et au plus
 Article 7 tard 1 5 jours francs après la fin du chargement, s'il entend
 prendre le solde ôu y renoncer.
 Après avoir pris contact avec la Communauté, l'organisme
 destinataire procure, pour le transport de la marchandise, un Dans le premier cas, l'article 8 deuxième et troisième alinéas
 ou plusieurs navires dont les dimensions correspondent aux est applicable au solde si la livraison de ce dernier n'a pas
 encore eu lieu .
 possibilités normales du port d'embarquement, ce ou ces
 navires devant être prêts à charger à une date se situant à Dans le second cas, la Communauté peut considérer qu'elle a
 l'intérieur de la période visée à l'article 4. rempli à l'égard de l'organisme destinataire l'engagement
 Le mandataire de l'organisme destinataire notifie cette date prévu à l'article I de l'accord et elle supporte les frais résul
 tant de la renonciation .
 ainsi que celle du début de la livraison à la Communauté dès
 qu'il en a connaissance, si possible 20 jours et en tout cas 10 En tout état de cause, passé le délai de 15 jours francs et en
 joyrs francs avant la date du début de la livraison. l'absence de notification de la part de l'organisme destina
 Il fixe avec le mandataire de la Communauté la cadence à
 taire, la renonciation est considérée comme acquise.
 laquelle doit s'effectuer la livraison . Article 10
 Article 8 À la livraison de la marchandise, le mandataire de l'orga
 nisme destinataire remet au mandataire de la Communauté
 Lorsque l'organisme destinataire n'est pas en mesure de une lettre de prise eh charge indiquant le port d'embarque
 commencer le chargement à la date prévue à l'article 7 ment, la date de prise en charge, ainsi que la nature et la
 premier alinéa, son mandataire en informe le mandataire de quantité de la marchandise prise en charge, et comportant,
 la Communauté par écrit dès que possible, et au plus tard éventuellement, des observations concernant la qualité de
 dans les 8 jours. cette marchandise .
 Information relative a la signature de l'accord de fourniture d'aide alimentaire
 entre la Communauté économique européenne et le Programme alimentaire
 mondial
 L'accord entre la Communauté économique européenne et le Programme alimentaire
 mondial relatif à la fourniture de céréales à titre d'aide alimentaire, que le Conseil a
 décidé de conclure le 20 mai 1975, a été signé à Bruxelles le 22 mai 1975,
 au nom du Conseil des Communautés européennes par : M. Andrew O'Rourke, ministre
 plénipotentiaire, représentant permanent adjoint, ainsi que par M. J. Durieux, directeur à
 la direction générale de l'aide au développement de la Commission des Communautés
 européennes ;
 au nom du Programme alimentaire mondial par M. Thomas Robinson, directeur exécutif
 adjoint.


text:
 Důležité právní upozornění
 |
 21999D0184
 Úřední věstník L 074 , 15/03/2001 S. 0012 - 0013
 Rozhodnutí Smíšeného výboru EHPč. 184/1999ze dne 17. prosince 1999,kterým se mění příloha XX (Životní prostředí) Dohody o EHPSMÍŠENÝ VÝBOR EHP,s ohledem na Dohodu o Evropském hospodářském prostoru ve znění Protokolu o úpravě Dohody o Evropském hospodářském prostoru (dále jen "Dohoda"), a zejména s ohledem na článek 98 této dohody,vzhledem k těmto důvodům:(1) Příloha XX Dohody byla změněna rozhodnutím Smíšeného výboru EHP č. 151/1999 ze dne 5. listopadu 1999 [1].(2) Rozhodnutí Komise 1999/427/ES ze dne 28. května 1999, kterým se stanovují ekologická kritéria pro udělování ekoznačky Společenství mycím prostředkům do myček nádobí [2], a rozhodnutí Komise 1999/476/ES ze dne 10. června 1999, kterým se stanovují ekologická kritéria pro udělení ekoznačky Společenství pracím prostředkům [3], by měla být začleněna do Dohody,ROZHODL TAKTO:Článek 1V příloze XX Dohody se za bod 2ep (rozhodnutí Komise 1999/205/ES) vkládá nový bod, který zní:"2eq. 399 D 0427: rozhodnutí Komise 1999/427/ES ze dne 28. května 1999, kterým se stanovují ekologická kritéria pro udělování ekoznačky Společenství mycím prostředkům do myček nádobí (Úř. věst. L 167, 2.7.1999, s. 38)."Článek 2Bod 2ef (rozhodnutí Komise 95/365/ES) se nahrazuje tímto:"399 D 0476: rozhodnutí Komise 1999/476/ES ze dne 10. června 1999, kterým se stanovují ekologická kritéria pro udělení ekoznačky Společenství pracím prostředkům (Úř. věst. L 187, 20.7.1999, s. 52)."Článek 3Znění rozhodnutí 1999/427/ES a 1999/476/ES v islandském a norském jazyce, která tvoří přílohu odpovídajících jazykových verzí tohoto rozhodnutí, jsou platná.Článek 4Toto rozhodnutí vstupuje v platnost dnem 18. prosince 1999 za předpokladu, že Smíšenému výboru EHP jsou učiněna veškerá oznámení podle čl. 103 odst. 1 Dohody.Článek 5Toto rozhodnutí bude zveřejněno v oddíle EHP a v dodatku EHP Úředního věstníku Evropských společenství.V Bruselu dne 17. prosince 1999.Za Smíšený výbor EHPpředsedaN. v. Liechtenstein[1] Úř. věst. L 15, 18.1.2001, s. 51.[2] Úř. věst. L 167, 2.7.1999, s. 38.[3] Úř. věst. L 187, 20.7.1999, s. 52.--------------------------------------------------