type: caselaw

jurisdiction: EU

text:
 9.11.2015
 EL
 Επίσημη Εφημερίδα της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης
 C 371/3
 Απόφαση του Δικαστηρίου (πρώτο τμήμα) της 16ης Σεπτεμβρίου 2015 [αίτηση του Ανωτάτου Δικαστηρίου Κύπρου (Κύπρος) για την έκδοση προδικαστικής αποφάσεως] — Alpha Bank Cyprus Ltd κατά Dau Si Senh κ.λπ.
 (Υπόθεση C-519/13) (1)
 ([Προδικαστική παραπομπή - Δικαστική συνεργασία σε αστικές ή εμπορικές υποθέσεις - Επίδοση και κοινοποίηση δικαστικών και εξώδικων πράξεων - Κανονισμός (ΕΚ) 1393/2007 - Άρθρο 8 - Άρνηση παραλαβής της πράξεως - Παράλειψη μεταφράσεως ενός εκ των διαβιβαζόμενων εγγράφων - Παράλειψη χρήσεως του τυποποιημένου εντύπου του παραρτήματος ΙI του εν λόγω κανονισμού - Συνέπειες])
 (2015/C 371/04)
 Γλώσσα διαδικασίας: η ελληνική
 Αιτούν δικαστήριο
 Ανώτατο Δικαστήριο Κύπρου
 Διάδικοι στην υπόθεση της κύριας δίκης
 Alpha Bank Cyprus Ltd
 κατά
 Dau Si Senh, Alpha Panareti Public Ltd, Susan Towson, Stewart Cresswell, Gillian Cresswell, Julie Gaskell, Peter Gaskell, Richard Wernham, Tracy Wernham, Joanne Zorani, Richard Simpson
 Διατακτικό
 Ο κανονισμός (ΕΚ) 1393/2007 του Ευρωπαϊκού Κοινοβουλίου και του Συμβουλίου, της 13ης Νοεμβρίου 2007, περί επιδόσεως και κοινοποιήσεως στα κράτη μέλη δικαστικών και εξωδίκων πράξεων σε αστικές ή εμπορικές υποθέσεις («επίδοση ή κοινοποίηση πράξεων») και κατάργησης του κανονισμού (ΕΚ) 1348/2000 του Συμβουλίου, έχει την έννοια ότι:
 —
 η υπηρεσία παραλαβής υποχρεούται σε κάθε περίπτωση και χωρίς να διαθέτει συναφώς περιθώριο εκτιμήσεως να γνωστοποιεί στον παραλήπτη πράξεως ότι έχει το δικαίωμα να αρνηθεί την παραλαβή της πράξεως αυτής, χρησιμοποιώντας συστηματικά προς τούτο το τυποποιημένο έντυπο του παραρτήματος II του εν λόγω κανονισμού, και ότι
 —
 η εκ μέρους της υπηρεσίας παραλαβής επίδοση ή κοινοποίηση πράξεως στον παραλήπτη της χωρίς επισύναψη του τυποποιημένου εντύπου του παραρτήματος II του κανονισμού 1393/2007 δεν συνιστά λόγο ακυρότητας της διαδικασίας, η παράλειψη δε αυτή μπορεί να θεραπευθεί κατά τις διατάξεις του εν λόγω κανονισμού.
 (1) ΕΕ C 377 της 21.12.2013.


type: contracts

text:
 12.1.2017
 HR
 Službeni list Europske unije
 L 8/33
 ODLUKA ZAJEDNIČKOG ODBORA EGP-a
 br. 196/2015
 od 10. srpnja 2015.
 o izmjeni Protokola 31 uz Sporazum o EGP-u, o suradnji u posebnim područjima izvan četiriju sloboda [2017/36]
 ZAJEDNIČKI ODBOR EGP-a,
 uzimajući u obzir Sporazum o Europskom gospodarskom prostoru (dalje u tekstu: Sporazum o EGP-u), a posebno njegove članke 86. i 98.,
 budući da:
 (1)
 Primjereno je nastaviti suradnju ugovornih stranaka Sporazuma o EGP-u u području mjera Unije koje se financiraju iz općeg proračuna Europske unije, a odnose se na uspostavu, funkcioniranje i razvoj unutarnjeg tržišta.
 (2)
 Protokol 31 uz Sporazum o EGP-u trebalo bi stoga izmijeniti kako bi se omogućilo nastavljanje te proširene suradnje nakon 31. prosinca 2014.,
 DONIO JE OVU ODLUKU:
 Članak 1.
 Članak 7. Protokola 31 uz Sporazum o EGP-u mijenja se kako slijedi:
 1.
 Nakon stavka 9. umeće se sljedeći stavak:
 „10. Države EFTA-e od 1. siječnja 2015. sudjeluju u mjerama Unije povezanima sa sljedećim proračunskim linijama koje su uključene u opći proračun Europske unije za financijsku godinu 2015.:
 —
 proračunskom linijom 02.03.01: ‚Funkcioniranje i razvoj unutarnjeg tržišta, posebno u područjima prijavljivanja, certificiranja i sektorskog usklađivanja’,
 —
 proračunskom linijom 12.02.01: ‚Uspostava i razvoj unutarnjeg tržišta’.”
 2.
 U stavcima 3. i 4. riječi „stavaka od 5. do 9.” zamjenjuju se riječima „stavaka od 5. do 10.”.
 Članak 2.
 Ova Odluka stupa na snagu prvog dana nakon posljednje obavijesti u skladu s člankom 103. stavkom 1. Sporazuma o EGP-u (*1).
 Primjenjuje se od 1. siječnja 2015.
 Članak 3.
 Ova se Odluka objavljuje u odjeljku o EGP-u Službenog lista Europske unije i u Dodatku o EGP-u Službenom listu Europske unije.
 Sastavljeno u Bruxellesu 10. srpnja 2015.
 Za Zajednički odbor EGP-a
 Predsjednik
 Atle LEIKVOLL
 (*1) Ustavni zahtjevi nisu navedeni.


type: other

text:
NU SUNT MOTANUL DANILA – Cititi uluitoarea plangere facuta de judecatorul Vasilica Danilet, la Decanatul Facultatii, impotriva studentului care l-ar fi defaimat: "In privat declara ca ma apreciaza, in public ma denigreaza... Postarea lui a insotit-o de anumite comentarii: gafa e ceea ce a facut natura cand ai fost tu adus pe lume, sluga, judecatorul lu' peste, accident al naturii, Poate ii mai cade dracului mustata de la atatia nervi" NU SUNT MOTANUL DANILA – Cititi uluitoarea plangere facuta de judecatorul Vasilica Danilet, la Decanatul Facultatii, impotriva studentului care l-ar fi defaimat: "In privat declara ca ma apreciaza, in public ma denigreaza... Postarea lui a insotit-o de an
 10 februarie 2014 17:41
 In urma cu o zi Lumeajustitiei.ro a prezentat discutiile purtate intr-un grup de avocati pe Facebook, in care se dezvaluia ca Danilet l-a mustrat pe un student la Drept pentru ca acesta a dat "Like" la o postare pe care magistratul alungat din CSM de 1.200 de judecatori a apreciat-o ca fiind denigratoare: "Sal. Ai dat mai inainte un like la un comentariu calomnios la adresa mea. Vreau sa stiu daca ai facut-o pentru ca erai de acord cu el".
 Pe acelasi grup al avocatilor s-a dezvaluit si ca Danilet nu s-ar fi oprit doar la a-l certa pe student pentru tupeul sau de a aprecia parerea unui alt utilizator al retelei de socializare, ci ar fi recurs chiar si la alte actiuni. Mai exact este vorba despre o sesizare depusa de Danilet la Senatul Facultatii din care acesta face parte.
 Lumeajustitiei.ro a primit sesizarea despre care se sustine ca i-ar apartine judecatorului Danilet si pe care acesta ar fi depus-o impotriva studentului in anul IV al Facultatii de Drept a Universitatii "Al.I.Cuza" Iasi. Danilet cere imperios sa se ia “masurile ce se impun pentru aspectele de natura etica a acestei fapte”. Interesant este ca sesizarea magistratului a ajuns pe masa decanului Facultatii de Drept a Universitatii "Al.I.Cuza" Iasi, nimeni altul decat judecatorul Tudorel Toader (foto 2 stanga) din CCR – Curte care a decis ca Danilet sa revina in CSM dupa ce a fost revocat de cei 1.200 de magistrati. De asemenea, Tudorel Toader este acelasi in fata caruia Danilet si-a sustinut, in toamna anului trecut, lucrarea de doctorat.
 Danilet ii aminteste studentului ca i-a trimis o carte pe banii lui: “I-am expediat pe cheltuiala mea o carte pe care am scris-o si care nu se regaseste in comert”
 In sesizare, Danilet se plange de faptul ca studentul, al carui nume nu il vom face public din motive de siguranta, l-a tradat, desi el a fost cel care i-a cerut sa fie prieteni pe Facebook. Danilet a tinut sa precizeze in sesizare ca i-a trimis prin posta studentului, pe banii lui, o carte pe care a scris-o si de care acesta avea nevoie la Facultate. In cuprinsul documentului inaintat judecatorului Tudorel Toader, Danilet a relatat cum a evoluat incidentul de pe Facebook, povestind ca mesajul calomniator la care studentul a dat "Like" il viza pe magistrat si pe parintii acestuia: "El a solicitat sa intre in randul membrilor abonati ai paginii mele („friends”) si mi-a adresat de mai multe ori cuvinte de consideratie pentru activitatea desfasurata de mine. Mai mult, mi-a solicitat si i-am expediat pe cheltuiala mea o carte pe care am scris-o si care nu se regaseste in comert.
 In cursul zilei de 4 februarie 2014 am primit un mesaj calomniator la adresa mea si a parintilor mei pe pagina mea de Facebook de la un tert. Am blocat corespondenta cu acesta, dar observand ca primise un „Like” din partea studentului am intrat intr-o discutie privata cu acesta intrebandu-l daca aceasta ar insemna ca este de acord cu acel mesaj. Mi-a raspuns negativ, asigurandu-ma ca a comis o eroare".
 Danilet a scapat de porecla d'Artagnan. Acum i se spune "Motanul Danila"
 Cristi Danilet a facut referire si la momentul in care o avocata si-a parat colegii, povestindu-i judecatorului ca pe grupul din care face parte au ajuns pasaje din discutia pe care a purtat-o cu studentul. In sesizarea depusa la Facultatea de Drept, membrul CSM se plange judecatorului CCR Tudorel Toader ca de la acel moment nu a mai putut lua legatura cu studentul, care i-a blocat accesul pe pagina, magistratul exprimandu-si totodata si nemultumirea fata de existenta unor comentarii denigratoare la adresa sa, care faceau referire la functia, numele si trasaturile sale fizice.
 Vazand noile apelative si porecle ale judecatorului Danilet, pe care acesta le-a enumerat in sesizarea depusa la Facultatea de Drept a Universitatii Al.I.Cuza din Iasi, am sesizat faptul ca magistratul nu mai este numit d'Artagnan-ul Justitiei, ci Motanul Danila. Dupa cum a reactionat la parerile negative pe care prietenii sai din mediul virtual sau avocatii le au despre el, putem afirma ca intr-adevar membrul CSM este cel mai aprig magistrat cand vine vorba despre imaginea sa. Totodata, remarcam si ca noua porecla nu ii prea este pe plac judecatorului, din moment ce sustine ca il “denigreaza”:
 "In paralel, mi s-a adus la cunostinta ca o parte din aceasta discutie a noastra a ajuns pe un grup de avocati, postata de (...). Am facut verificari si am constatat ca studentul postase o frantura din corespondenta mea cu el pe pagina lui de Facebook, aducand-o la cunostinta publicului fara a-mi cere acordul. I-am cerut explicatii studentului, dar a refuzat sa imi raspunda si mi-a blocat imediat accesul la pagina sa, punandu-ma astfel in imposibilitatea de a ma apara intr-un fel cu privire la comentariile care au inceput sa se deruleze acolo. Postarea lui a insotit-o de anumite comentarii privind functia, numele, trasaturile fizice prin care ma denigreaza in mod direct: „gafa e ceea ce a facut natura cand ai fost tu adus pe lume”, „sluga”, „judecatorul lu` peste”, „accident al naturii”, „Motanul Danila”, „ordinu` lu` Vasilica”, „Poate ii mai cade dracului mustata de la atatia nervi”, „persoana care nu pricepe nimic ce se intampla in jurul lui (sluga)”."
 Danilet l-a reclamat decanului Tudorel Toader pe studentul de la Drept pentru activitatea pe care a avut-o pe Facebook
 In sesizarea sa Danilet il informeaza pe decanul Facultatii de Drept, Tudorel Toader ca va apela la caile legale in ceea ce priveste atitudinea studentului, insa pana atunci ii solicita judecatorului CCR, in calitate de decan al Facultatii, sa ia masurile care se impun in cazul studentului din anul IV, fiind vorba, in opinia magistratului, de aspecte de natura etica incalcate de cursant. Danilet nu omite sa precizeze ca, in prezent, are o anumita pozitie sociala si “un anumit profesionalism”, dar si o relatie buna cu aceasta facultate, relatie care il indreptateste sa caracterizeze atitudinea studentului in ceea ce il priveste drept “ceva accidental si regretabil”:
 "Am ramas siderat de modul in care studentul a procedat in ce ma priveste: in privat declara ca ma apreciaza, in public ma denigreaza. Precizez ca nu am avut niciun dialog cu el in contradictoriu si nimic nu justifica un astfel de comportament. Dincolo de aspectele legale pe care inteleg sa le valorific printr-o alta cale, va solicit sa luati masurile ce se impun pentru aspectele de natura etica a acestei fapte, daca ele intra in competenta dvs. Astfel, eu insumi sunt absolvent al facultatii dumneavoastra si am raspuns chemarii ELSA pentru prelegeri cu studentii, pe teme legate de admitere in justitie si viata de magistrat. Tin legatura in mediul virtual cu multi studenti ai facultatii, carora le raspund cu drag la intrebarile legate de admiterea la INM si pe care ii incurajez sa sustina cu incredere acest concurs. Am incredere in noile generatii de juristi si imi pun cu sinceritate speranta ca ei vor imbunatati considerabil calitatea justitiei din Romania. Aceste legaturi constante cred ca s-au bazat pe o anumita pozitie sociala pe care o ocup si un anumit profesionalism care ma caracterizeaza in cei 15 ani de magistratura. Relatia buna pe care o am de multi ani cu facultatea ma indrituieste sa cred ca un comportament ca al studentului mentionat este ceva accidental si regretabil, de care membrii ELSA Iasi se dezic".
 *Cititi aici in integralitate sesizarea judecatorului Cristi Vasilica Danilet impotriva studentului din anul IV de la Facultatea de Drept din cadrul Unniversitatii Al.I.Cuza din Iasi
 # ockiu 10 februarie 2014 17:55 +49
 n-ai voie dom le sa dai like asa fara sa-ti ceri voie de la imparatie (a se citi danilet)
 # POLO.NICU 10 februarie 2014 18:47 +34
 Mare-i gradina ta Doamne. Asta te judeca. Da-s curios ceva face dl. Toader.Acum 18 ani cand imi era profesor sigur s-ar fi distrat copios...
 # Pristanda ! 10 februarie 2014 20:36 +29
 pe atunci,acum 18 ani nea tudorel avea mintea acasa acum e cu srcova,nu credeti ?
 # VA GARANTEZ 10 februarie 2014 20:06 +15
 Ca VASILICA nu E ONANIST!
 # Viky 10 februarie 2014 18:06 -71
 pai ieu il inteleg sa fie sukarit.pai sane gandim la studentiii academiei intact a lu domnu Dan Voiculescu pai ce iei siar permite sa zica pe faibuk ca pute a partz oridecateori este vizitati de turnator.pai vadati seama cear fii daca vreun student dala ar scrie ca stapanul antenelor e turnator?
 # m 10 februarie 2014 22:38 +30
 as fi citit ce ai scris daca as fi inteles macar prima fraza...impaca-te cu limba romana si apoi exprima-ti parerea,poate atunci voi citi.
 # m 10 februarie 2014 22:43 +11
 # Dora 10 februarie 2014 23:58 +28
 Treci inapoi in clasa intai.Dupa ce termini clasa a patra mai incearca sa postezi,poate intelege cineva ceva.
 # andrei 11 februarie 2014 00:18 -2
 pt VIKY mama ei de gramatica... Viky date 10 februarie 2014 18:06 -16 pai ieu il inteleg sa fie sukarit.pai sane gandim la studentiii academiei intact a lu domnu Dan Voiculescu pai ce iei siar permite sa zica pe faibuk ca pute a partz oridecateori este vizitati de turnator.pai vadati seama cear fii daca vreun student dala ar scrie ca stapanul antenelor e turnator?
 # @Viky 11 februarie 2014 00:33 +14
 Bai nene (viki) ia uite si tu ce scor ai adunat Daca taceai nu era mai bine si pentru noi ca nu ne mai chinuiam sa-ti descifram mizeria si nici tu nu incasai atatea injuraturi? Da\' poate ca aveai frigideru\' gol... Ei bine, acu\' e plin!
 # maria 11 februarie 2014 10:55 +5
 ce are sula cu prefectura !??
 # unul din lumea cea mare 10 februarie 2014 18:13 +26
 asa !!!!!......ceva!!!!! limbricule nu incerci sa ma urmaresti si pe mine ca ti/am spus limbric?imi arog drepturile de autor,de fapt nu mi le arog ci mi le asum caci am fost primul care ti/am zis LIMBRICULE intr/o postare aici pe luju.bai viperelor realizati acum de ce VA URASTE LUMEA ASA DE INTENS!!!!!!ASA .CEVA MAI GREU DE IMAGINAT(cuvint de cod wheel tie)
 # Vasilică Vasilache 10 februarie 2014 22:49 +16
 Vasilică a decis demult că nu e voie să te atingi de cei din justiţie, să fie clar: „Cu acel prilej - să zicem - am investigat, am avut acces efectiv la notele informative şi la alte tipuri de documente care s-au strâns la SIPA. Ceea ce am constatat atunci - cred că am şi spus public - acest serviciu militarizat din cadrul MJ nu s-a ocupat, aşa cum trebuia, doar cu adunatul informaţiilor din rândul deţinuţilor, ele nu au vizat numai actele de corupţie cu privire la mediul penitenciar, aşa cum ar fi trebuit, ci există note informative cu privire la săvârşirea unor anumite infracţiuni sau abuzuri administrative comise de funcţionari din ANP (DGP atunci), fapte comise de judecători, procurori, de grefieri, de poliţişti şi de avocaţi.\" http://www.curentul.ro/2011/index.php/2011040156639/Actualitate/Un-membru-al-CSM-nu-s-a-sfiit-sa-toarne-din-arhiva-SIPA-americanilor.html
 # unul din lumea cea mare 11 februarie 2014 10:43 +1
 pentru vasilica vasilache//m/am uitat dupa linkul tau dar nu am gasit nimic,sigur nu ai gresti undeva?chiar ma interesa sa vad ce se zice despre sipa.chiar daca oficial NU MAI EXISTA,DAR STIU CA TOTUSI CITIVA DINTRE INITIATI(ea este alive and kiking) se refera la sipa ,,ca fiind al 7 lea trib pierdut- este codificata asa ca dupa tora referire la triburile israelite)cuvint de cod escape slide
 # Ce tara trista! 10 februarie 2014 18:17 +44
 Daca o sa mai gasiti alt judecator din lumea larga care sa stea sa puna la suflet like-uri si comentarii pe forum sau site-uri, sa faca reclamatii ca nu-l iubeste tot poporul... eu imi fac seppuku in fata la CSM, daca nu gasiti atunci astfel de frustrari nu au ce cauta la un judecator care trebuie sa fie echilibrat si cu toata tigla pe casa.
 # Ela 10 februarie 2014 18:35 +37
 Vai...si asta e judecator,adica asta te judeca>Trist f trist.Sa stai ca tampitul sa urmaresti likurile pe fb....pai asta nu mai fac nici elevii de liceu.Asta s-ar considera un om serios ,care nu ia fb de bun.Oricum,am vazut ca el tot ce are se spus, spune pe fb.Are mai probleme saracul ,dar mai saracii de noi,sa nu ajungem pe mana astuia!
 # raluca roti 10 februarie 2014 18:37 -59
 oare citeste cineva, din interes si nu din pura curiozitate si cu dezgust, asemenea articole mizerabile si plicticoase? unii se plictisesc rau de tot. respect dl Danilet!!
 # pt raluca 10 februarie 2014 18:39 +45
 Raluca, motanul Danila e mandru de tine. Bravo. Hai ca poti mai mult, noi avem incredere in tine Saraca de tine
 # Diana 10 februarie 2014 20:22 +27
 Vorbesti de artiocole mizerabile si te referi la acesta? Inseamna ca esti la fel de ingusta la minte ca si Stelian asta... Vasilica sau cum naiba l-o mai chema. Asta in cazul in care nu esti chiar el sub acoperire si la fel de penibil ca si pe facebook, incerci sa-ti creezi o onoare pe care apoi s-o aperi. Pana la urma frustrati ca el ne judeca si daca votul judecatorilor din tara nu a contat, poate va conta prima persoana care-i va iesi in cale si care-i va testa cunostintele de karate. Doar asa....pt ca e just!
 # o pensionara 10 februarie 2014 20:49 +29
 raluca,pentru caricatura asta de danilet au murit copii si tineri in 89\'.dar poate ai circimstante atenuante ca nu erai nascuta atunci sau erai prea mica.hai sa-ti spun eu ceva..........nici macar comunistii aia nu au avut tupeul si curajul sa faca ce fac astazi mafiotii astia de teapa lui danilet sau shreck asa cum il alint eu(uita-te si la alte articole cu foto)si ai sa intelegi de ce
 # @Raluca 11 februarie 2014 00:43 +13
 Raluco... te mananca-n... tanga_ca pe Vasilica. Cacofonia se trage de la (din) idolu vostru comun.
 # xsi0 11 februarie 2014 09:30 +9
 Esti sadica. Cu toate ca te-ai plictisit, ai mai pierdut timpul sa si comentezi. Nu citeste nimeni presa din interes. Din interes citesti cartea de bucate (de exemplu). Sunt la fel de dezgustat cum eram dezgustat de Stan si Bran (daca intelegi ce vreau sa spun).
 # Danilet este un penal, DNA sa-l inchida 10 februarie 2014 18:39 +39
 Danilet e un spagar, tot Clujul stie cum si-a luat casa. Asta ar vinde-o si pe ma-sa, asa l-a dat in gat pe Neacsu si l-a vandut pe Dumbrava. Si-a batut joc de studentii imbogatindu-se din vanzarea unor hotarari ale CSM. I-a indus pe toti in eroare ca aceste hotarari s-ar gasi numai in cartea lui si ca el le poate garanta intrarea la INM, cand hotararile astea erau gratuite si CSM era obligfat sa le publice. E un mafiot care trebuie inchis.
 # mia 10 februarie 2014 18:46 -24
 # o pensionara 10 februarie 2014 20:51 +16
 pai ce mai este de demonstrat ?ca totul este cert........
 # unul din lumea cea mare 10 februarie 2014 21:01 +9
 pentru mia//apa/i uda ......ESTE UN TRUISM NU SE DEMONSTREAZA ASA SI CU LIMBRICUL SHRECK........ESTE UN TRUISM NU MAI ESTE NIMIC DE DEMONSTRAT. sa/i zic axioma daca nu intelegi ce/i truism?
 # @Danilet e un penal... 11 februarie 2014 00:48 +13
 De aceeasi parere pana la treaba cu DNA-ul! Ca sa poata fi inchisi cretini ca Vasilica ar trebui ca cineva sa inchida mai intai DNA-ul care vorba unui prieten de-a lui Vasilica... e \"pernicios\"! Abia dupa aia se va putea spera la ceva \"curatenie\"!
 # George 33 10 februarie 2014 18:39 -24
 e o mare diferenta intre a manca c***t si a-ti exprima o opinie... asa le trebuie !!!!!!!!! bv. felicit initiativa
 # george 69 10 februarie 2014 18:40 +19
 Doar atat george? se supara motanul ca nu combati mai tare. :)) simpaticule
 # @Georgica 11 februarie 2014 00:55 -2
 Si atunci (daca tot te pricepi) de ce nu-ti exprimi si tu opinia? Ti se pare mai comod sa-ti mananci... produsele?
 # raluca 10 februarie 2014 18:40 -16
 # raluca 10 februarie 2014 18:42 -14
 se pare ca persoanele \"citate\" in articol se plictisesc in continuare si raspund comentariilor care nu le convin.:))) bv...poti mai mult!!
 # Divortatul 10 februarie 2014 18:52 +26
 Bineinteles ca nu e o probelema in faptul ca e divortat. Nu ar fi nici macar faptul ca e divortat de doua ori. Insa cum e mai Danilet sa-ti vezi copilul dupa 10 ani??? Sa nu intrebi nimic, sa nu te intereseze, sa te doara la oua ca ti-ai lasat un copil in greutati la Vatra-Dornei. Se stie ca ai plecat de la Judecatoria de acolo tocmai ca sa scpai de familia pe care o aveai si sa fugi de copil. Macar aceasta a doua fetita n-o parasi, mafiotule!
 # Mihai 10 februarie 2014 19:00 -29
 De unde ,,se stie ca,, toate mizeriile astea? De la Antena 3?
 # anca 10 februarie 2014 23:06 +15
 e pe bune! daca ai fi stundent la cuza in iasi ai sti intamplarea despre care se vorbeste aici. e mai reala ca musteata lui danilet
 # @Mihai 11 februarie 2014 00:59 +8
 Nu, nu de la Antena 3, de la ******!
 # Divortatul (acum cu probe) 10 februarie 2014 19:45 +16
 Mihai, ai dreptate, trebuia sa arat sursele: http://portal.just.ro/245/SitePages/Dosar.aspx?id_dosar=24500000000033192&id_inst=245 http://portal.just.ro/99/SitePages/Dosar.aspx?id_dosar=9900000000026677&id_inst=99 Mai sunt si altele, trebuie doar sa sti unde sa cauti.
 # Danilet si-a executat hotararile cu drepturi restante la Buc 10 februarie 2014 19:51 +10
 Mai judecatori, stiati asta? Solutia pe scurt: Admite cererea de încuviinţare a executării silite. Încuviinţează executarea silita pe raza sectorului 4. Fara cale de atac. Pronunţată în şedinţa publică, azi, 23.02.2012. http://portal.just.ro/4/SitePages/Dosar.aspx?id_dosar=400000000153470&id_inst=4
 # Ce-a facut? 11 februarie 2014 01:05 -1
 Am mers pe link dar nu am inteles nimic. Vrei, te rog, sa explici si pentru profani? ops:' />
 # Mihai Oatu, Vatra Dornei 10 februarie 2014 20:17 +29
 In Vatra Dornei se cunoaste toata aceasta situatie cu divortul lui Danilet. Are o fata care are acum 14 ani si pe care a parasit-o cam pe la 5 ani. Fata se numeste Ana Maria, a fost crescuta de maica-sa si de bunici. Danilet nu a vizitat-o pana anuL trecut cand fata a venit la Bucuresti. Problema este ca un astfel de individ da lectii de moralitate si integritate tuturor, dar e incapabil sa-si creasca copilul din prima casatorie.
 # maria 11 februarie 2014 11:02 +12
 dezgustator e ca si-a pus parintii sa-l dea in judecata ptr. intretinere , astfel sa fie pensia ptr. copil mai mica !
 # Mihai Oatu, Vatra Dornei 10 februarie 2014 20:28 +8
 # raatcuoci 10 februarie 2014 20:31 +9
 Ditai judele si nu stie art 30 alin 1 din Constitutie ! Daca a dat doar like e ok, n-are treaba cu alin 6.
 # Semnati petitia Lupea 10 februarie 2014 22:00 +13
 Semnati acum sa scapam de mafiot! http://www.petitieonline.com/signatures/asteptam_dna_sa_poposeasca_si_pe_la_csm/start/490
 # @ ... petitia Lupea 11 februarie 2014 18:59 0
 Am ezecutat! Acuma sa mai pofteasca si altii ca daca nu vindeca problema nici nu strica mai multe semnaturi. Hai coraj!
 # pisica 10 februarie 2014 22:05 +12
 ba danilet faci de ras magistratii. sunt vreo 2000 in romania dar cred ca li s-a suit la cap
 # Ioana D. 10 februarie 2014 23:51 +13
 Vai de noi cu asemenea oameni la justitie,cine ne imparte noua dreptatea,asemenea specimene fara moralitate,necinstiti,odiosi,mincinosi si nedrepti! Din pacate,multi din cei care fac parte din aceasta tagma,nu mai au nici o legatura cu cinstea, dreptatea sau adevarul,banii si ambitiile politice ii motiveaza pe multi dintre ei,nu pe toti,precizez,cred,sper,ca mai sunt si oameni care cred in adevarata justitie,cea legata la ochi,insa acest personaj...trebuie indepartat grabnic din acest sistem,dar...cine sa faca asta? Pana atunci, sa \'\'ne radem\'\' de postarile absolut ingrozitoare scrise de unul care ar trebui sa fie un exemplu de integritate,dar, daca ne uitam la Presedintele tarii...nu poti sa mai ceri nimic!
 # ADEVARUL 11 februarie 2014 14:08 +4
 AZI TRAIM EXPERIENTA UNEI DICTATURI JUDICIARE,A MAGISTRATIILOR,AFLATA IN CONTINUAREA CELEI SOCIALISTE,IN CARE MAGISTRATII SI-AU CREAT UN STAT IN STAT PRIN CARE CAPUSEAZA ROMANIA,ASTA ESTE STATUL DE DREPT.CAT DESPRE LIMBRICUL CU OCHELARI CU PRETENTIE DE JUDECATOR,NU TE SUPARA D-NU DANILA DAR NU MERITI NICI UN SCUIPAT,NU LIKE SAU ALT-CEVA.SA-TI FIE RUSINE TIE SI PUTORILOR DIN CSM CA NU FACETI NIMIC SA DEBLOCATI INSTANTELE,DOAR SA LE BLOCATI.ASTA VA ESTE INTERESUL,PROBABIL.NESIMTIT MAI MARE DECAT VOI ESTE DOAR BASESCU,CEL CARE VA CONDUCE CA PE ULTIMII FRAIERI,DE EL ASCULTATI VOI,NU DE LEGI SI OAMENI.IMBUIBATIILOR.DORMITATI PE ARGINTII EXCROCILOR.
 # Ioana D. 10 februarie 2014 23:52 +10
 # Dora 11 februarie 2014 00:09 +19
 Asta precis e judecator?Adica e absolvent pe bune a unui institut de invatamant superior?Nu si-a cumparat cumva diploma fara sa treaca pe la universitate?Acest specimen cu comportament infantil judeca oameni?
 # @Dora 11 februarie 2014 01:11 +13
 Asa cica. Ba zice ca are si doftorat ceva... Vai de mama ei justitie!
 # dide 11 februarie 2014 22:36 +1
 E si doctor in drept din dec. 2013.
 # Zina 11 februarie 2014 00:26 +17
 Dincolo de orice aspect personal (sau al persoanei!) acest domn, inteleg ca este judecator, e corijent serios la limba romana (in care se presupune ca formuleaza sentinte?!). Cum adica i-a trimis o carte care nu se REGASESTE in comert?!?! Poate care nu se gaseste... Scuze, dar mai departe nu am avut rabdare sa corectez! La acest nivel, mai ales cand faci o reclamatie, daca nu ai proprietatea termenilor iti cauti un corector... Absolut jenant. Si trist... E si profesor?! As dori sa ii citesc lucrarea de doctorat, sa vad acolo cat de corect se exprima!
 # @Zina 11 februarie 2014 01:16 +4
 Daca nu ai avut rabdare sa-i \"corectezi\" reclamatia crezi ca vei \"regasi\" destula rabdare sa-i citesti \"opera\"?
 # Zina 11 februarie 2014 00:28 +5
 # @Zina bis 11 februarie 2014 01:21 0
 Vezi daca dai cu copy/paste? Ai postat din neatentie de doua ori. Cat ti-a luat sa-ti faci ciorna? Nu zic ca nu ai dreptate in ce-l priveste pe filfizon (Vasilica), numai fii atenta ca-ti pui si tu ignoranta goala pe tapet...
 # Olimpiodor Păgubeanu 11 februarie 2014 00:39 +9
 ...„care nu se regăsește în comerț”??? Adicătelea cum ar veni un fel de „nu se găsește în comerț”... Băi pulifrici de doi lei, atenție la limba română, că-ți furi cartonaș roșu! \'R-ați ai draq de ciuperci macoviste!
 # mircea 11 februarie 2014 01:03 -26
 Eu nu inteleg de ce inca nu va da Danilet in judecata pentru denigrare sau ceva de genul.
 # @mircea 11 februarie 2014 01:28 +15
 Mirceoouuu! Daca nici atata nu ai inteles ai trecut degeaba prin viata. Fa un bine omenirii si sinucide-te ca oricum din viata nu mai ai sanse sa intelegi ceva. Iti promit ca daca faci gestu... iti ofer eu raspunsul la dilema ca epitaf. Promit!
 # Un plictisit 11 februarie 2014 13:55 +3
 Răspuns pentru \"mircea\" cel mare prost. Pentru că nu poate.
 # POLO.NICU 11 februarie 2014 07:20 +11
 Miauuuuuuuuuuuuuuu...
 # @ POLO.NICU 11 februarie 2014 11:46 +5
 ... pus-o?!
 # ia ghici? 11 februarie 2014 01:07 +3
 Pentru ca stim mai multe despre el decat insusi Maria Sa Motanul...Nu vrem sa devina publice! Daca vrea Maria Sa...
 # briciu 11 februarie 2014 07:15 +14
 cu specimene gen dànilet,hàinealà ghica ,codruta.morar si zegrean justitia va functiona la comanda mafiotului de bàsescu.
 # keman 11 februarie 2014 08:19 -27
 Sunteti niste frustrati!!Cum puteti sa va dati cu parerea despre o persoana, care nici nu o cunoasteti??Sa-nteleg ca ,asa sunteti voi,cei care va curg toate alea,zi de zi,la televizor...,si acest gen de site-uri!BRAVOS,HALAL CULTURA!!
 # Un plictisit 11 februarie 2014 13:53 +7
 Eu nu i-am cunoscut, personal, nici pe Hitler, nici pe Maica Tereza, însă, mi-am format o imagine despre ei citind și ascultând pe alții. Nu știu dacă ești prost sau secătură, însa dacă \"băieții\" au ajuns să apeleze la papagali, ca tine, citez și eu un cunoscut personaj, \"e putin stimabile\".
 # anca 11 februarie 2014 10:42 +12
 Cred ca dl.Danilet are prea mult timp liber!
 # Hingherul 11 februarie 2014 11:23 -1
 # Maria 11 februarie 2014 12:24 -3
 Suplimentar : corespondenta invocata de Dvs (dupa cum rezulta din chiar attachmentul postarii) e catre ELSA Iasi (adresat Presedintei ELSA) si doar spre stiinta domnului Decan, strict raportat la codul etic si regulamentele universitare proprii ce guverneaza conduita studentilor din UAIC.De la asta si pana la agatarea in improscarile voastre clasice a Facultatii si personalului e o distanta pe care doar lipsa Dvs de coloana vertebrala si deontologie jurnalistica ar putea-o parcurge.
 # Liviu 11 februarie 2014 13:29 +5
 Acum toate ca toate,clar individul are probleme dar totusi cand a ajuns in CSM a ajuns pe voturile majoritati judecatorilor din Romania nu? Va dati seama de calitatea judecatorilor sau cel putin de puterea lor de a judeca rational chiar si in instanta si asta spune multe despre justitia din tara asta.Voi ati votat personajul si o tara intreaga trebuie sa il suporte .Sunteti inamovibili ce mai.JUSTITIE COMUNISTA.
 # ihi 11 februarie 2014 19:31 +3
 Pe Danilet nu-l suporta nimeni,cand vorbeste o face automat,ca un somnifer.Nu gandeste,el judeca. .Iar mafia din csm il tolereaza.ca este bun pentru ei.De la o asemenea spurcaciune de judecator nu o sa vezi initiativa sau imaginatie,este un postadolescent pe care nu voturile judecatorilor l-au adus in csm,judecatori sunt indivizii acestia in cadrul Instantei,unde ar trebui sa fie,in viata de zi cu zi sunt altceva,ne-o dovedesc azi cu prisosinta;lasi,saraci cu duhul,smenari,paraleli cu justitia,niste profitori care raman toata viata ca Danilet,la nivelul teoriei,mai comoda decat conditia de judecator...care implica responsabilitate,daruire,curaj.
 # anca 11 februarie 2014 22:18 +1
 Raspunsul dat pe Facebook de studentul acuzat de jud. Danilet: (1) Lamuriri pentru curiosi. 1.Stim cu totii ca Motanul Danila e supi.(denumit in continuare MD) 2.MD are prea mult timp liber si prea multi bani incasati de la stat. 3.MD, in intelegere cu parintii lui, a inventat un proces prin care sa ii reduca pensia alimentara fiicei sale. De la fabuloasa suma de 1000 de lei la 500 de lei, motivand ca ii da prea multi bani. Voua, trompetelor lui MD, va doresc un asemenea tata. 4.MD imi spune ca e infractiune sa divulgi corespondenta proprie, dar el face acelasi lucru cand o trimite unei asociatii din care fac parte. 5.MD spune ca il laud in privat. Toti cei care au interactionat cu mine imi cunosc sarcasmul foarte dezvoltat. Pot sa ii pun la dispozitie o lista de cel putin 50 de oameni care s-au prins imediat cand le spuneam cat sunt de frumosi si de destepti. Dar unora posibil sa le mearga mai greu mecanismul.
 # anca 11 februarie 2014 22:20 +2
 6.MD spune ca mi-a trimis nu stiu ce carte. El s-a oferit sa imi trimita o carte, nu i-am cerut eu nimic, aspect ce reiese foarte clar din conversatia cu el, carte pe care nu am primit-o niciodata. Si chiar daca as fi primit o notificare sa o iau de la posta, nu m-as fi dus, pentru ca cine ma cunoaste stie ca imi permit sa o cumpar si ca nu stau la pomana porcului. (Hooo ma, ca nu te-am jignit, asa e expresia) 7.MD spune ca l-am jignit. Dar cum voiai sa reactionezi cand tu imi ameninti familia si prietenii din sistemul juridic? ( Suna cumva a amenintare ,,Daca in 24 de ore nu iti ceri scuze public, iti fac sesizare la Barou si la Parchet” sau ,, Vei avea mari probleme in cariera ta din cauza acelor comentarii!” ? ) 8.MD, cand 90% din oameni iti spun sa te duci acasa, de ce le violezi dorinta? 9.Alt personaj, ,,Omu’ cu citatu’ “ , a iesit din barlog si a inceput sa loveasca din nou cu citate. Am o dedicatie specifica: ,, Cainele moare de drum lung si prostul de grija altuia”.
 # anca 11 februarie 2014 22:21 +2
 10.Am decis sa ma retrag formal din asociatie, pentru a nu ii mai oferi lui MD ocazia sa denigreze asociatia si sa loveasca in imaginea ei. Personajului de la pct. 9 nu ii este cunoscut aceasta tactica de a rezolva problemele, intrucat in vocabularul sau nu exista cuvintele ,,onoare” sau ,,devotament” fata de acest grup. P.S.: Orice asemanare cu personajele reale este pur neintamplatoare.
 # @ anca 11 februarie 2014 22:40 -1
 Mie personal nu mi se pare deloc mai pejorativ MD (Motanu Danila) decat VD (Vasilica Daaaa...nilet)! Cand individul va realiza penibilul din... definitie... io cre\'ca va... scapa lumea de penibil! Cum? Sa intrebe si va primi safaturi cacalau, ca sa ma exprim pe intelesu lui!
 # anca 11 februarie 2014 22:49 -1
 la cine te referi cand spui ”individul”?
 # ion 12 februarie 2014 10:21 +4
 Ce semianalfabet idiot: ”si care nu se regaseste in comert”. Invata limba romana, paduche afemeiat!
 # D 13 februarie 2014 01:31 +3
 Ce mai profesori avem!
 # Daniel Marian 14 februarie 2014 12:34 +4
 motane motănele motănaşe şe anumi nu-ţî plaşe bre cară-te drk odată de peste tot - tv, net, ia barca şi du-te unde-a dus băsescul flota !
 # Catalin 8 august 2014 16:42 0
 Urâtă fiinţă!
 # Georgiana 22 octombrie 2014 23:38 0
 Intr-o zi, am avut contact cu domul Danitila cand eram la serviciu. L-am "servit" cu ce avea nevoie, fara sa stiu cine este. A stat la rand si nu s-a enervat ca eu sunt incepatoare si ca nu cunosc anumite lucruri. Mi-a facut o impresie foarte frumoasa, un om foarte MODEST! Nu am cuvinte.... Dupa ce a plecat, un coleg imi spune: stii cine este?! eu: nu! Pai este etc... Si am zis: Doamne, nu pot sa cred!!! Sper ca am vorbit frumos pt ca eu sunt multumita de cum s-a comportat si sper sa nu-l fi dezamagit! Tot respectful pt acest domn! Ma bucur ca l-am cunoscut! Mi-a dat un exemplu demn de urmat.


type: wikipedia

text:
Charles Lawrence Persip (* 26. Juli 1929 in Morristown, New Jersey; † 23. August 2020) war ein US-amerikanischer Jazzmusiker (Schlagzeug).
 Leben und Werk
 Persip nahm Unterricht bei Pearl Brackett, spielte in New Jersey bei Billy Ford und studierte später an der Juilliard School. In Atlantic City und in New York City spielte er mit Tadd Dameron, Clifford Brown und Benny Golson sowie in den Big Bands von Dizzy Gillespie und Harry James. Zwischen 1953 und 1958 arbeitete er für Dizzy Gillespie, mit dem er auch auf Tournee durch Europa, den Nahen Osten und Südamerika ging, aber auch für Hal McKusick. Anschließend spielte er mit Zoot Sims, Phil Woods, Harry Edison (1958/59), Harry James, Quincy Jones, Hank Mobley, George Russell, Dinah Washington, Don Ellis und Gil Evans, hatte aber seit 1959 auch seine erste eigene Band, die Jazz Statesmen. Er spielte eigene Alben mit Freddie Hubbard und Ron Carter ein.
 Zunehmend war Persip als Schlagzeuglehrer und Leiter von Clinics tätig, arbeitete aber auch mit Cannonball Adderley, Archie Shepp, Sam Rivers, Rahsaan Roland Kirk, Mary Lou Williams und Gene Ammons. Zwischen 1966 und 1973 war er musikalischer Leiter der Band von Billy Eckstine, anschließend für die New York Jazz Repertory Company tätig. Er war auch an Einspielungen von Musikern wie Curtis Fuller, Big Joe Turner, Jerome Richardson, Joe Albany, Ray Charles, Mal Waldron, Randy Weston, Sonny Rollins, Frank Foster, Mary Osborne, Craig Harris, Larry Ridley und Kenny Burrell beteiligt.
 In den 1980er-Jahren leitete Persip die Bigband-Formation Charli Persip and Superband , mit der er zwei Alben für Soul Note vorlegte. Im folgenden Jahrzehnt arbeitete er weiterhin mit Musikern wie Ernie Wilkins, Randy Weston, Reggie Workman, Bubba Brooks, Sherman Irby, Doc Jones und Makanda Ken McIntyre. Im Bereich des Jazz war er laut Tom Lord zwischen 1953 und 2005 an 240 Aufnahmesessions beteiligt, zuletzt mit der Sängerin Hisayo Tominaga.
 Persip, der an der New York New School unterrichtet, gab 1987 das Lehrbuch „How Not To Play Drums“ heraus. Sein Interesse als Schlagzeuger war besonders darauf gerichtet, das Hardbop-Gefühl der kleinen Combos auf den Bigband-Kontext zu übertragen.
 Diskografische Hinweise
 Bandleader
 1960: Charlie Persip & the Jazz Statesmen (Bethlehem)
 1980: Charlie Persip/Gerry LaFurn: Superband (Stash)
 1984: In Case You Missed It (Soul Note)
 1987: No Dummies Allowed (Soul Note)
 2008: Charli Persip & Supersound: Intrinsic Evolution
 Kollaborative Aufnahmen
 1980: Art Blakey / Charlie Persip / Elvin Jones / Philly Joe Jones: Gretsch Drum Night at Birdland (Roulette)
 1981: Art Blakey / Charlie Persip / Elvin Jones / Philly Joe Jones: Gretsch Drum Night at Birdland, Vol. 2 (Rhino/Warner)
 Begleitmusiker
 1956: Quincy Jones: This Is How I Feel About Jazz (ABC-Paramount, 1957)
 1961: The Johnny Coles Quartet: The Warm Sound (Epic BA-17015)
 1961: Cannonball Adderley & His Orchestra: African Waltz (Riverside)
 mit Hank Mobley
 1953: Newark 1953 (Uptown, 2012)
 1956: Hank Mobley Sextet (Blue Note, 1957)
 1958: Peckin' Time (Blue Note, 1959)
 mit Lee Morgan
 1956: Lee Morgan Sextet (Blue Note, 1957)
 1957: Dizzy Atmosphere (Specialty)
 1957: Lee Morgan Vol. 3 (Blue Note)
 Filmografie
 Geheimwaffe Jazz, Regie: Hugo Berkeley, USA 2017. Mit Dizzy Gillespie und Quincy Jones auf Propaganda-Tour in Europa und Asien.
 Lexikalischer Eintrag
 Martin Kunzler: Jazz-Lexikon. Band 2: M–Z (= rororo-Sachbuch. Bd. 16513). 2. Auflage. Rowohlt, Reinbek bei Hamburg 2004, ISBN 3-499-16513-9.
 Richard Cook, Brian Morton: The Penguin Guide of Jazz on CD. 6. Auflage. Penguin, London 2002, ISBN 0-14-051521-6.
 Weblinks
 Charli Persip bei Drummerworld
 Persip über seine Interessen (engl.)
 Einzelnachweise
 Jazz-Schlagzeuger
 US-Amerikaner
 Geboren 1929
 Gestorben 2020
 Mann


text:
 21.9.2012
 DE
 Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union
 L 255/2
 ÜBEREINKOMMEN
 über die Erhaltung und Bewirtschaftung der Fischereiressourcen der Hohen See im Südpazifik – Hinterlegung der Genehmigungsurkunde durch die Europäische Union
 Die Europäische Union hat das genannte Übereinkommen am 26. Juli 2010 unterzeichnet.
 Im Anschluss an den Beschluss des Rates der Europäischen Union vom 3. Oktober 2011 über die Unterzeichnung des Übereinkommens hat die Europäische Union am 18. Oktober 2011 ihre Genehmigungsurkunde bei der Regierung Neuseelands, die das Übereinkommen verwahrt, hinterlegt.
 Nach Artikel 38 Absatz 1 tritt das Übereinkommen 30 Tage nach Hinterlegung der achten Ratifikations-, Beitritts-, Annahme- oder Genehmigungsurkunde in Kraft. Der Depositar hat der Europäischen Union mitgeteilt, dass bis zum 25. Oktober 2011 sechs Urkunden hinterlegt worden sind.


text:
Αριθ. C 294/4 [ EL | Επίσημη Εφημερίδα των Ευρωπαϊκών Κοινοτήτων 5 . 10 . 96
 νέα σύμβαση παροχής υπηρεσιών, οι όροι της οποίας δίκης κατά του Giuseppe Cordella, από το Δικαστήριο των
 έχουν ουσιαστικά το ίδιο περιεχόμενο; Ευρωπαϊκών Κοινοτήτων την έκδοση προδικαστικής απο
 φάσεως επί του ακόλουθου ερωτήματος:
 3 . Υφίσταται τουλάχιστον μεταβίβαση εγκαταστάσεως, υπό
 την έννοια του άρθρου 1 παράγραφος 1 της οδηγίας Συμβιβάζονται οι διατάξεις της οδηγίας 91/156/ΕΟΚ, της
 77/187/ΕΟΚ, όταν ουσιαστικά οι ίδιοι πάντοτε εργαζόμε 18ης Μαρτίου 1991 (ΕΕ αριθ . L 78, σ. 32), με τις διατάξεις του
 νοι εκτελούν τα ίδια καθήκοντα φυλάξεως και επιτηρή ιταλικού προεδρικού διατάγματος αριθ . 915, της 10ης
 σεως υπό τις ίδιες ουσιαστικά προϋποθέσεις, τις οποίες Σεπτεμβρίου 1982 ('), και, γενικότερα, με την ισχύουσα στην
 έχει καθορίσει σε μεγάλο βαθμό o αναθέσας τη φύλα Ιταλία νομοθεσία περί αποβλήτων και περί δευτερογενών
 ξη ; πρώτων υλών;
 ( ] ) Στη διάταξη περί παραπομπής αναφέρεται εσφαλμένα « 1992»
 αντί για « 1982».
 Αίτηση για την έκδοση προδικαστικής αποφάσεως, που
 υπέβαλε με Διάταξη της 12ης Απριλίου 1996 το Tribunale
 Civile e Penale di Brescia, στο πλαίσιο της ποινικής δίκης
 που εκκρεμεί ενώπιον του κατά του Riccardo Piccaluga
 (Υπόθεση C-250/96) Αίτηση για την έκδοση προδικαστικής αποφάσεως, που
 (96/C 294/05 ) υπέβαλε με διάταξη της 9ης Ιουλίου 1996 το Landesarbeit
 sgericht Hamm, στο πλαίσιο των διαφορών μεταξύ Helmut
 Με διάταξη της 12ης Απριλίου 1996, η οποία περιήλθε στη Kampelmann και Landschaftsverband Westfalen-Lippe (C
 Γραμματεία του Δικαστηρίου των Ευρωπαϊκών Κοινοτήτων 253/96), Wilfried Tilsch και Landschaftsverband Westfalen
 στις 22 Ιουλίου 1996, το Tribunale Civile e Penale di Brescia Lippe (C-254/96), Dieter Klingelhöfer και Landschaftsver
 ζήτησε, στο πλαίσιο της ποινικής δίκης που εκκρεμεί ενώπιον band Westfalen- Lippe (C-255/96), Heinrich Schmidt και
 του κατά του Riccardo Piccaluga, από το Δικαστήριο των Landschaftsverband Westfalen-Lippe (C-256/96), Stadtwerke
 Ευρωπαϊκών Κοινοτήτων την έκδοση προδικαστικής απο Witten GmbH και Andreas Schade (C-257/96) και Klaus
 φάσεως επί των ακόλουθων ερωτημάτων: Haseley και Stadtwerke Altena GmbH (C-258/96)
 1 . Μπορεί να θεωρηθεί ότι οι εθνικές διατάξεις περί ευρέ (Υποθέσεις C-253/96 — C-258/96)
 σεως εργασίας και περί προσωρινής εργασίας, οι οποίες (96/C 294/07)
 είναι δημοσίου δικαίου , καθόσον έχουν θεσπιστεί προς
 προστασία των εργαζομένων και της εθνικής οικονομίας, Με διάταξη της 9ης Ιουλίου 1996, η οποία περιήλθε στη
 ανάγονται στην άσκηση δημοσίας εξουσίας υπό την Γραμματεία του Δικαστηρίου των Ευρωπαϊκών Κοινοτήτων
 έννοια των συνδυασμένων διατάξεων των άρθρων 66 και στις 23 Ιουλίου 1996, το Landesarbeitsgericht Hamm (τέταρτο
 55 της συνθήκης; τμήμα) ζήτησε, στο πλαίσιο των διαφορών μεταξύ Helmut
 Kampelmann, Wilfried Tilsch, Dieter Klingelhöfer, Heinrich
 2. Μπορεί να θεωρηθεί ότι τα ανωτέρω άρθρα, εφόσον δεν •Schmidt κατά Landschaftsverband Westfalen-Lippe , Stadtw
 υπάρχουν επακριβείς εκτελεστικές διατάξεις στον εν erke Witten, GmbH κατά Andréas Schade και Klaus Haseley
 λόγω τομέα, έχουν απευθείας εφαρμογή (συνέπεια της κατά Stadtwerke Altena GmbH, από το Δικαστήριο των
 οποίας θα ήταν η διακύβευση των δημοσίου δικαίου Ευρωπαϊκών Κοινοτήτων την έκδοση προδικαστικής απο
 σκοπών που επιδιώκονται με τους ιταλικούς νόμους που φάσεως επί των ακόλουθων ερωτημάτων:
 ισχύουν ως προς την εύρεση εργασίας και την προσωρινή
 εργασία) και ότι επιτρέπουν σε οποιονδήποτε, ιδιώτη ή 1 . Αποσκοπούν οι διατάξεις του άρθρου 2 της «οδηγίας
 δημόσιο φορέα, να αναπτύσσει, χωρίς να υπόκειται σε σχετικά με την υποχρέωση του εργοδότη να ενημερώνει
 κανένα ειδικό έλεγχο και χωρίς να χρειάζεται καμία ειδική τον εργαζόμενο για τους όρους που διέπουν τη σύμβαση ή
 άδεια, δραστηριότητες διαμεσολαβήσεως μεταξύ προ τη σχέση εργασίας» (οδηγία 91 /533/ΕΟΚ — ΕΕ αριθ .
 σφοράς και ζητήσεως εργασίας ή/και παροχής προσωρι L 288 της 18. 10. 1991 , σ. 32), λαμβανομένου υπόψη του
 νού εργατικού δυναμικού , στην περίπτωση κατά την σκοπού που τάσσεται στο προοίμιο αυτής της αποκαλού
 οποία το κράτος μέλος δεν είναι σε θέση να ικανοποιήσει μενης αποδεικτικής οδηγίας, «καλύτερη προστασία των
 πλήρους με τη δική του διοικητική δομή τη ζήτηση εργαζομένων απέναντι σε μια πιθανή ελλιπή γνώση των
 υπηρεσιών στην αγορά εργασίας; δικαιωμάτων τους και στην ύπαρξη μεγαλύτερης διαφά
 νειας στην αγορά εργασίας», στη βελτίωση, προς όφελος
 του εργαζομένου , της κατανομής του βάρους της αποδεί
 ξεως, υπό την έννοια ότι με τον κατάλογο των κατ'
 Αίτηση για την έκδοση προδικαστικής αποφάσεως, που ελάχιστον στοιχείων του άρθρου 2 παράγραφος 2 της
 υπέβαλε με Διατάξη της 13ης Ιουλίου 1993 η Pretura οδηγίας 91 /533/ΕΟΚ επιδιώκεται να διασφαλιστεί ότι ως
 Circondariale di Rovigo, Sezione Distaccata di Adria, στο προς αυτά τα στοιχεία o εργαζόμενος δεν χρειάζεται να
 πλαίσιο της ποινικής δίκης που εκκρεμεί ενώπιον της κατά προσκομίσει αποδείξεις όταν πρόκειται περί προβολής
 του Giuseppe Cordella αξιώσεων στηριζομένων στη σύμβαση εργασίας στο πλαί
 (Υπόθεση C-251/96) σιο δίκης ενώπιον εργατικών δικαστηρίων;
 (96/C 294/06
 2. Σε περίπτωση καταφατικής απαντήσεως στο πρώτο ερώ
 Με Διάταξη της 13ης Ιουλίου 1993 , η οποία περιήλθε στη τημα: εφαρμόζονται απευθείας οι διατάξεις του άρθρου 2
 Γραμματεία του Δικαστηρίου των Ευρωπαϊκών Κοινοτήτων παράγραφος 2 στοιχείο γ) σημείο n) της οδηγίας 91 /
 στις 22 Ιουλίου 1996, η Pretura Circondariale di Rovigo, 533/ΕΟΚ έναντι του Δημοσίου , ενεργούντος ως ιδιωτικού
 Sezione Distaccata di Adria, ζήτησε, στο πλαίσιο της ποινικής δικαίου εργοδότης, από 1ης Ιουλίου 1993 , δεδομένου :


text:
 10.3.2007
 BG
 Официален вестник на Европейския съюз
 C 56/15
 Иск, предявен на 14 декември 2006 г. — Комисия на Европейските общности срещу Република Малта
 (Дело C-508/06)
 (2007/C 56/26)
 Език на производството: английски
 Страни
 Ищец: Комисия на Европейските общности (представители: M. Konstantinidis и D. Lawumni, Agents)
 Ответник: Република Малта
 Ищецът желае Съдът да:
 —
 установи, че малтийските власти не са изпълнили задълженията си по член 11 от Директива на Съвета 96/59/ЕО (1) във връзка с член 54 от Акта за присъединяване от 2003 г.;
 —
 да осъди Република Малта да заплати съдебните разноски.
 Правни основания и главни доводи
 Срокът, в който Република Малта е била длъжна да представи плановете и насоките по член 11 от Директивата, е изтекъл на 1 май 2004 г.
 (1) ОВ L 243, стр. 31.


type: legislation

text:
 29.3.2019
 PL
 Dziennik Urzędowy Unii Europejskiej
 L 88/23
 ROZPORZĄDZENIE WYKONAWCZE KOMISJI (UE) 2019/531
 z dnia 27 marca 2019 r.
 zmieniające rozporządzenie (WE) nr 1484/95 w odniesieniu do ustalania cen reprezentatywnych w sektorach mięsa drobiowego i jaj oraz w odniesieniu do albumin jaj
 KOMISJA EUROPEJSKA,
 uwzględniając Traktat o funkcjonowaniu Unii Europejskiej,
 uwzględniając rozporządzenie Parlamentu Europejskiego i Rady (UE) nr 1308/2013 z dnia 17 grudnia 2013 r. ustanawiające wspólną organizację rynków produktów rolnych oraz uchylające rozporządzenia Rady (EWG) nr 922/72, (EWG) nr 234/79, (WE) nr 1037/2001 i (WE) nr 1234/2007 (1), w szczególności jego art. 183 lit. b),
 uwzględniając rozporządzenie Parlamentu Europejskiego i Rady (UE) nr 510/2014 z dnia 16 kwietnia 2014 r. ustanawiające zasady handlu niektórymi towarami pochodzącymi z przetwórstwa produktów rolnych oraz uchylające rozporządzenia Rady (WE) nr 1216/2009 i (WE) nr 614/2009 (2), w szczególności jego art. 5 ust. 6 lit. a),
 a także mając na uwadze, co następuje:
 (1)
 Rozporządzeniem Komisji (WE) nr 1484/95 (3) ustanowiono szczegółowe zasady stosowania systemu dodatkowych należności przywozowych oraz ustalono ceny reprezentatywne w sektorach mięsa drobiowego i jaj oraz w odniesieniu do albumin jaj.
 (2)
 Z regularnych kontroli danych, na podstawie których są określane ceny reprezentatywne produktów w sektorach mięsa drobiowego i jaj oraz w odniesieniu do albumin jaj, wynika, że należy zmienić ceny reprezentatywne w przywozie niektórych produktów, uwzględniając wahania cen w zależności od pochodzenia tych produktów.
 (3)
 Należy zatem odpowiednio zmienić rozporządzenie (WE) nr 1484/95.
 (4)
 Ze względu na konieczność zagwarantowania, że środek ten będzie mieć zastosowanie możliwie jak najszybciej po udostępnieniu aktualnych danych, niniejsze rozporządzenie powinno wejść w życie z dniem jego opublikowania,
 PRZYJMUJE NINIEJSZE ROZPORZĄDZENIE:
 Artykuł 1
 Załącznik I do rozporządzenia (WE) nr 1484/95 zastępuje się tekstem znajdującym się w załączniku do niniejszego rozporządzenia.
 Artykuł 2
 Niniejsze rozporządzenie wchodzi w życie z dniem jego opublikowania w Dzienniku Urzędowym Unii Europejskiej.
 Niniejsze rozporządzenie wiąże w całości i jest bezpośrednio stosowane we wszystkich państwach członkowskich.
 Sporządzono w Brukseli dnia 27 marca 2019 r.
 W imieniu Komisji,
 za Przewodniczącego,
 Jerzy PLEWA
 Dyrektor Generalny
 Dyrekcja Generalna ds. Rolnictwa i Rozwoju Obszarów Wiejskich
 (1) Dz.U. L 347 z 20.12.2013, s. 671.
 (2) Dz.U. L 150 z 20.5.2014, s. 1.
 (3) Rozporządzenie Komisji (WE) nr 1484/95 z dnia 28 czerwca 1995 r. określające szczegółowe zasady wdrażania systemu dodatkowych należności przywozowych oraz ustalające ceny reprezentatywne w sektorach mięsa drobiowego i jaj oraz w odniesieniu do albumin jaj i uchylające rozporządzenie nr 163/67/EWG (Dz.U. L 145 z 29.6.1995, s. 47).
 ZAŁĄCZNIK
 „ZAŁĄCZNIK I
 Kod CN
 Opis towarów
 Cena reprezentatywna
 (EUR/100 kg)
 Zabezpieczenie, o którym mowa w art. 3
 (EUR/100 kg)
 Pochodzenie (1)
 0207 12 90
 Ptactwo z gatunku Gallus domesticus, oskubane i wypatroszone, bez głów i łapek, i bez szyj, serc, wątróbek i żołądków, znane jako »kurczaki 65 %« lub inaczej zgłaszane, zamrożone
 129,7
 0
 AR
 0207 14 10
 Kawałki z ptactwa z gatunku Gallus domesticus, bez kości, zamrożone
 239,1
 18
 AR
 215,1
 26
 BR
 240,6
 18
 TH
 1602 32 11
 Przetwory z ptactwa z gatunku Gallus domesticus niepoddane obróbce cieplnej
 289,6
 0
 BR
 ”
 (1) Nomenklatura krajów ustalona w rozporządzeniu Komisji (UE) nr 1106/2012 z dnia 27 listopada 2012 r. w sprawie wykonania rozporządzenia Parlamentu Europejskiego i Rady (WE) nr 471/2009 w sprawie statystyk Wspólnoty dotyczących handlu zagranicznego z państwami trzecimi, w odniesieniu do aktualizacji nazewnictwa państw i terytoriów (Dz.U. L 328 z 28.11.2012, s. 7).


text:
Враня стена е село в Западна България. То се намира в община Земен, област Перник.
 География
 Село Враня стена се намира в планински район. Неговите 22 махали са пръснати по северния склон на Земенска планина и по южния склон на Рудина планина, които от своя страна са част от среднопланинската област Краище в югозападната част на страната. По-голямата част от селото е съсредоточена в плодородната долина на Треклянска река, известна още като Коритото.
 Обществени институции
 Кметско наместничество
 Културни и природни забележителности
 В източната страна над центъра на селото се намира „Големио Камик“, който от подножието до върха е над 100 метра. Орлите пролетно време си вият в него гнездата, а под него се носят легенди, че имало дълбоки като кладенци дупки, пълни с вода. Това природно формирование е дало името на селото.
 Редовни събития
 Известни личности
 Родени във Враня стена
 Евтим Арсов (1914 – 1959) – виден деец на Земеделското движение в България
 Зиновий Поппетров (1838 – 1911) – духовник и възрожденски деец
 Устабаши Марко (края на ХVІІІ век – след 1866 г.) – Известен строител изградил няколко сгради на Рилския манастир – воденица (1833), жилищни и стопански корпуси на метоха Пчелино (ок. 1850), жилищни и стопански корпуси на метоха „Орлица“ (1862) и сградата с хлебопекарната до Самоковската порта на манастира (1866). Вероятно е работил заедно с устабаши Миленко Велев по строежа на източното крило на Рилския манастир.
 Устабаши Велчо (неизв. – неизв.) – Известен църковен строител, изградил заедно с майстор Нико от село Дивля, църквите „Св. Илия“ (1865) в село Дивля, Пернишко, „Св. Никола“ (1875) в село Стайчевци, Пернишко, както и „Св. Илия“ в село Горочевци, Трънско.
 Литература
 Тулешков, Н. Архитектурното изкуство на старите българи. Том 2 и том 3, Късно средновековие и Възраждане, С., 2006
 Външни препратки
 Села в област Перник
 Населени места в община Земен


text:
Elekter on elektrilaengute olemasolust tingitud nähtuste kompleks. Positiivse või negatiivse elektrilaenguga osakesed tekitavad elektromagnetvälja ja alluvad selle toimele.
 Sõna "elekter" ei ole tänapäeval terminina kasutusel. Varem on füüsikas selle all mõistetud elektrilaengut (elektrihulka). Praegu mõistetakse üldkeeles elektri all kõige sagedamini elektrienergiat või elektrivoolu.
 Ajalugu
 Sõna "elekter" tuleneb vanakreeka sõnast ήλεκτρον (ēlektron) 'merevaik'. Nimetus tuleb sellest, et merevaik hõõrdel elektriseerub ehk omandab elektrilaengu.
 Juba Thales teadis, et kui merevaiku hõõruda, siis hakkab see kergesti teisi esemeid külge tõmbama, kuid ta ei osanud seda nähtust seletada. Antiikajal tunti paljusid teisigi elektrinähtuseid: välku, Elmo tulesid ja loomset elektrit, mida näiteks elektrirai tekitab, kuid neid ei seostatud omavahel ega teatud ühise sõnaga nimetada.
 Esimesena oli elektriliste nähtuste uurimises tänapäevases mõistes teaduslikult edukas inglise astronoom ja füüsik William Gilbert. Tema aastal 1600 avaldatud raamatus "De magnete" eristati esimest korda merevaigu hõõrumisel tekkivat külgetõmbejõudu püsimagneti külgetõmbejõust. Tema leiutas ka ladinakeelse sõna "electricus", mida hakkas kasutama elektrinähtuste kohta, ja sellest tuleb elektrit tähistav sõna paljudes keeltes.
 Vaata ka
 Elektrotehnika
 Elektriväli
 Elektromotoorjõud
 Viited
 Videod
 (ingliskeelne video elektriga seotud mõistete kujunemise kohta)


text:
 23.6.2005
 DE
 Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union
 L 161/13
 BESCHLUSS DES GEMEINSAMEN EWR-AUSSCHUSSES
 Nr. 6/2005
 vom 8. Februar 2005
 zur Änderung des Anhangs II (Technische Vorschriften, Normen, Prüfung und Zertifizierung) des EWR-Abkommens
 DER GEMEINSAME EWR-AUSSCHUSS -
 gestützt auf das Abkommen über den Europäischen Wirtschaftsraum, geändert durch das Anpassungsprotokoll zum Abkommen über den Europäischen Wirtschaftsraum, nachstehend „Abkommen“ genannt, insbesondere auf Artikel 98,
 in Erwägung nachstehender Gründe:
 (1)
 Anhang II des Abkommens wurde durch den Beschluss des Gemeinsamen EWR-Ausschusses Nr. 163/2004 vom 3. Dezember 2004 (1) geändert.
 (2)
 Die Richtlinie 2004/61/EG der Kommission vom 26. April 2004 zur Änderung der Anhänge der Richtlinien 86/362/EWG, 86/363/EWG und 90/642/EWG des Rates hinsichtlich von Rückstandshöchstgehalten für bestimmte in der Gemeinschaft verbotene Schädlingsbekämpfungsmittel (2) ist in das Abkommen aufzunehmen -
 BESCHLIESST:
 Artikel 1
 In Anhang II Kapitel XII des Abkommens wird nach Nummer 38 (Richtlinie 86/362/EWG des Rates) und nach Nummer 54 (Richtlinie 90/642/EWG des Rates) folgender Gedankenstrich eingefügt:
 „—
 32004 L 0061: Richtlinie 2004/61/EG der Kommission vom 29. April 2004 (ABl. L 127 vom 29.4.2004, S. 81)“
 Artikel 2
 Der Wortlaut der Richtlinie 2004/61/EG in isländischer und norwegischer Sprache, der in der EWR-Beilage des Amtsblattes der Europäischen Union veröffentlicht wird, ist verbindlich.
 Artikel 3
 Dieser Beschluss tritt am 9. Februar 2005 in Kraft, sofern dem Gemeinsamen EWR-Ausschuss alle Mitteilungen nach Artikel 103 Absatz 1 des Abkommens vorliegen (3).
 Artikel 4
 Dieser Beschluss wird im EWR-Abschnitt und in der EWR-Beilage des Amtsblattes der Europäischen Union veröffentlicht.
 Brüssel, den 8. Februar 2005
 Für den Gemeinsamen EWR-Ausschuss
 Der Vorsitzende
 Richard WRIGHT
 (1) ABl. L 133 vom 26.5.2005, S. 5.
 (2) ABl. L 127 vom 29.4.2004, S. 81.
 (3) Ein Bestehen verfassungsrechtlicher Anforderungen wurde nicht mitgeteilt.


text:
 23.10.2010
 FR
 Journal officiel de l'Union européenne
 C 288/4
 Chambre des pourvois
 (2010/C 288/07)
 Le 14 septembre 2010, le Tribunal a décidé que la chambre des pourvois sera composée, pour la période allant du 20 septembre 2010 au 31 août 2011, du Président du Tribunal et, selon un système de roulement, de deux présidents de chambre.
 Les juges qui siégeront avec le président de la chambre des pourvois pour composer la formation élargie de cinq juges seront les trois juges de la formation initialement saisie et, selon un système de roulement, deux présidents de chambre.


text:
Гарваново е село в Южна България. То се намира в община Хасково, област Хасково.
 История
 По сведения на Филип Баранов селото е основано през 1760 г. постепенно от преселили се българи от близкото село Гедикли (българската махала).
 Тогава в с. Гедикли, разположено на 2 км югоизточно от днешното с. Гарваново, се появила страшна болест чума. По думи на стари хора на ден са умирали по 13 – 14 души. За предизвестие, че в къщата има смърт се издигали бели флагове. По-стари хора разказват, че Бог е изпратил това наказание, защото селяните не посрещали тържествено обхождащия района си владика, който уж изпросил това проклятие за селото. Изплашени, слисани, неможещи да се справят с болестта, жителите търсят спасение в бягство от селото. През една пролетна вечер няколко сродни семейства решават и напускат селото, мъчейки се да избягат от наказанието на болестта. Те се отправят в северозападна посока. Местността, в която се настаняват, е камениста. Загрижените техни близки и съседи тръгват да ги търсят. След няколкодневно бродене и търсене съселяните им, изкачвайки се на височината „Паламидите“, виждат покрай река Банска новопостроени колиби. Един от търсещите се провиква: „Ей ги хе... хе нашите, где са накацали като гарвани!. Виждате ли ги?" Така новообразуваното селище, което се разполага между тогавашните села Карапазарли и Гедикли, получава името си – Гарваново.
 През следващите дни всички жители на с. Гедикли се заселват по поречието на реката, там, където тя напуска скалистата местност и се отправя в равнината.
 Турският управник на с. Гедикли благословил новото селище и то заживяло своя си живот, постепенно разраствайки се и запълвайки малката долина на р. Банска.
 Население
 Численост
 Численост на населението според преброяванията през годините:
 Етнически състав
 Преброяване на населението през 2011 г.
 Численост и дял на етническите групи според преброяването на населението през 2011 г.:
 Вероизповедание
 В селото жителите са основно източноправославни християни. Съществува и конгрешанска общност, част от Съюза на евангелските съборни църкви.
 Редовни събития
 Събор в началото на юли на центъра в селото.
 Личности
 Петър Янев (1886-1925), политик
 Иван Петев Димов (1934-2020), богослов.
 Бележки
 Села в област Хасково
 Населени места в община Хасково


text:
Santiago Raúl Lange Roberti (San Isidro, 22 september 1961) is een Argentijns zeiler.
 Lange nam in totaal zes maal deel aan de Olympische Zomerspelen en won drie medailles, in 2004 en 2008 in de catamaran Tornado.
 Lange kreeg in 2015 de diagnose longkanker. Zijn linkerlong is operatief verwijderd.
 Tijdens de Olympische Zomerspelen 2016 won hij samen met Cecilia Carranza Saroli in de catamaran Nacra 17. De Nacra 17 was de eerste olympische discipline waarbij een gemengde bemanning verplicht was.
 Lange won tijdens de wereldkampioenschappen vijf medailles, drie in de Tornado waaronder een wereldtitel en twee in de Nacra 17.
 Resultaten
 Wereldkampioenschappen
 Olympische Zomerspelen
 Argentijns zeiler
 Argentijns olympisch kampioen


text:
1346 oli juliaanisen kalenterin vuosi 1300-luvulla. Euroopan historiassa se sijoittuu myöhäiskeskiajalle. Aasiassa musta surma iski vuonna 1346 Kultaisen ordan kaanikunnan joukkoihin ja tauti levisi myös genovalaisiin kauppiaisiin, joita vastaan joukot hyökkäsivät, ja myöhemmin muualle Eurooppaan. Keski- ja Itä-Aasiassa oli useita kapinoita sen jälkeen, kun kaani Qazan sai surmansa kansannousussa, ja Tšagatain kaanikunta alkoi horjua. Kiinassa alkaneet kapinat johtivat lopulta Yuan-dynastian kaatumiseen. Intialainen Vijayanagaran valtakunta sai vuoden aikana useita voittoja pohjoisen muslimivalloittajista.
 Itäisessä Euroopassa Dusan Silni julistettiin Serbian tsaariksi 16. huhtikuuta (pääsiäisenä). Viereisessä Bysantin valtakunnassa turkkilainen prinssi Orhan meni naimisiin prinsessa Theodoran kanssa, sillä hän halusi solmia liiton turkkilaisten ja Bysantin välille. Useita vuosia aiemmin alkaneet sisällissodat jatkuivat sekä Bulgariassa että Bysantissa. Tanska myi osan pohjoisesta Virosta saksalaiselle ritarikunnalle kukistettuaan lopulta Yrjönpäivän yön kansannousun. Keski-Euroopassa Luxemburgin Kaarle IV valittiin Pyhän saksalais-roomalaisen keisarikunnan hallitsijaksi 11. heinäkuuta. Italia kärsi nälänhädästä ja useat pankkisuvut, kuten Bardi, menivät vuoden 1346 aikana vararikkoon. Länsi-Euroopassa Ranskan ja Englannin välinen satavuotinen sota jatkui, ja Englannin kuningas Edvard III johti hyökkäystä mantereelle ja saavutti useita voittoja.
 Tapahtumia
 Keväällä 1346 – vakava ruttoepidemia alkaa Krimillä.
 18. maaliskuuta – ranskalaiset valmistautuvat puolustamaan Englannin kanaalin rannikkoa.
 Huhtikuu – ranskalaiset piirittävät Aiguillonin.
 16. huhtikuuta – Dusan Silni julistaa Skopjessa Serbian valtakunnan syntyneeksi. Se käsittää suuren osan Kaakkois-Euroopasta.
 Touko–kesäkuu – englantilainen hyökkäyslaivasto kokoontuu Portsmouthiin.
 9. kesäkuuta – St Pol de Leonin taistelu: englannin armeija voittaa Bretagnen herttua Kaarlen.
 20. kesäkuuta – englantilaiset saavat pienen voiton Bretagnen La Roche-Derrienissä.
 24. kesäkuuta – Gentin, Bruggen ja Ypresin johtajat sopivat tukevansa Edvard III:ta.
 Heinäkuu – Edvard III määrää Englannin satamat suljettaviksi, jotta tietoja ei virtaisi Ranskaan.
 1. heinäkuuta – Luxemburgin Kaarle IV valitaan Pyhän saksalais-roomalaisen keisarikunnan keisariksi.
 3. heinäkuuta – Englannin laivasto yrittää purjehtia Portsmouthista Normandiaan, mutta vastatuuli pakottaa sen takaisin.
 11. heinäkuuta–12. heinäkuuta – Edvard III ja Englannin armeija ylittävät Englannin kanaalin ja aloittavat hyökkäyksen Ranskaan.
 12. heinäkuuta–18. heinäkuuta – englantilaiset ryöstelevät ja polttavat kaupunkeja ja kyliä Cotentinin niemimaalla.
 26. elokuuta – Crécyn taistelu, jossa englantilaiset voittavat ranskalaiset. Ranskalaisilla oli sotilaallinen ylivoima, mutta englantilaisilla oli voimakkaammat jousiaseet, jotka kykenivät läpäisemään ranskalaisten rautaiset (korkea hiilipitoisuus) suojukset.
 4. syyskuuta – englantilaiset aloittavat Calais'n piirityksen.
 Lokakuu – Kaarle IV:n haastaja Ludvig Baijerilainen saa surmansa villisikametsällä ja sisällissota estyy.
 17. lokakuuta – Neville's Crossin taistelu: Englannin armeija voittaa skotlantilaiset.
 Loka–marraskuu – rutto tyhjentää useita mongolien kaupunkeja asukkaista Krimillä.
 Porvoo sai kaupungin oikeudet.
 Aasia
 Länsi-Aasia
 Kultainen orda jatkoi vaikeuksista huolimatta Kaffan kaupungin piiritystä vuoden 1346 ajan. Musta surma iski ordan joukkoihin ja niiden täytyi perääntyä, mutta vasta seuraavana vuonna. Erään venäläisen kronikoitsijan mukaan:
 Kertomuksessa luetteloidut alueet ja kansat edustavat suurta osaa Länsi-Aasiasta ja Kaukasuksesta. "Eurooppalaiset muukalaiset" tarkoittavat niitä, jotka taistelivat tataareja vastaan mongolien johtamassa Kaffan piirityksessä. Nämä eurooppalaiset palasivat Eurooppaan seuraavana vuonna ja toivat ruton mukanaan. Krimiltä palaavat matkaajat kantoivat ajan kreikkalaisten ja arabialaisten oppineiden mukaan ruton myös Bysanttiin ja Arabiaan.
 Toinen kuvaus Krimin tapahtumista kertoo:
 Nykytutkijat pitävät tapahtumia yhtenä varhaisimmista ja kuolettavimmista biologisista hyökkäyksistä maailmanhistorian aikana, vaikka mongolien olikin pakko lopulta vetäytyä. Varhaisten lähteiden mukaan rutto alkoi levitä keväällä 1346 Don-joen alueella Mustanmeren lähellä, minkä jälkeen se levisi Venäjälle, Kaukasukselle ja Genovan hallitsemille alueille vuoden sisällä.
 Etelämpänä Georgiassa kuningas Giorgi V Loistava kuoli ja Davit IX nousi hänen tilalleen. Giorgi V oli onnistunut valloittamaan koko Etelä-Kaukasian alueen. Vuoden 1346 jälkeen kuningaskunta alkoi kuitenkin taantua Giorgin kuoleman ja pian sen jälkeen maahan levinneen ruton vuoksi.
 Keski- ja Itä-Aasia
 Keski-Aasiassa vuonna 1346 mongolivaltakunnan hajoaminen ja muslimilaajentuminen jatkuivat. Qazaghanin joukot surmasivat Tšagatain kaanikunnan hallitsijan kaani Qazanin, minkä jälkeen kaanikunta ei enää ollut yhtenäinen valtakunta. Qazghan johti turkkilaisten aatelisten ryhmää, joka vastusti mongolien hallintoa. Qazanin joukot olivat haavoittaneet Qazghania aiemmin samana vuonna, mutta Qazan ei käyttänyt vastustajansa heikkoutta hyödykseen vaan vetäytyi, ja suuri osa hänen joukoistaan hylkäsi hänet.
 Idempänä Shah Mirza valloitti Kashmirin ja hänestä tuli ensimmäinen aluetta hallinnut muslimi. Myös Kathmandu valloitettiin samana vuonna. Muslimit kärsivät Intian eteläosassa kuitenkin joitakin takaiskuja. Hindulainen Vijayanagaran kuningaskunta valloitti Hoysalan alueen ja vietti "voitonjuhlaa" vahvistettuaan asemaansa legitiiminä, pohjoisen muslimihallintoa vastustavana hinduvaltakuntana. Pohjois-Intiassa Delhin sultanaatin hallitsija Muhammud bin Tughluq ei halveksinut pelkästään hindulaisuutta vaan myös etelän Deccanin alueen kulttuuria. Telugupäälliköt kokoontuivat vastustamaan sulttaania samana vuonna ja juhlivat voittoaan.
 Vielä idempänä Ibn Battuta matkusti Kaakkois-Aasiasta Khanbaliqiin (Pekingiin) Kiinassa. Vaikka alueen muslimihallitsijat toivottivatkin hänet lämpimästi tervetulleeksi, he neuvoivat häntä lähtemään kaupungista nopeasti. Sisällissota oli pakottanut kaanin poistumaan kaupungista, ja mellakat levisivät yhä laajemmalle. Samaan aikaan korealainen buddhalainen munkki Taigo Wangsa matkusti Kiinaan saadakseen koulutuksen buddhalaisen johtajan Shih-wun johdolla. Taigo perusti myöhemmin koreanbuddhalaisen Taigo-lahkon. Japanissa loppui Kōkoku-kausi ja alkoi Shōhei-kausi.
 Eurooppa
 Itä- ja Pohjois-Eurooppa
 Vuonna 1346 Tanska myi pohjoisen Viron saksalaiselle ritarikunnalle Yrjönpäivän yön kansannousun jälkeen. Liivinmaan ritaristo osti Tanskan alueet 10 000 markalla ja Tanska rikkoi Kristofer II:n vuonna 1329 antaman lupauksen, jonka mukaan Tanska ei koskaan hylkäisi tai myisi alueitaan Virossa. Tanskan kuningas antoi jopa julkisen lausunnon, jossa hän katui rikottua lupausta ja pyysi anteeksiantoa paavilta.
 Balkanilla Dusan Silni kruunattiin 16. huhtikuuta eli pääsiäisenä Skopjessa uuden Serbian valtakunnan tsaariksi. Serbia piti nyt hallussaan suurta osaa Kaakkois-Euroopasta. Vuonna 1346 sekä Bulgaria että Bysantti (joka hallitsi valtaosaa Kreikasta) olivat sisällissotien keskellä. Rodopivuorten ja Aigeian alueen itsenäisellä bulgarialaisella hallitsijalla Momtšililla oli sodissa merkittävä rooli. Hän oli yksi ensimmäisistä paikallisista johtajista, joka ymmärsi osmanien aiheuttaman uhan. Momtšil pyysi Bulgarian ja Bysantin keisareita auttamaan häntä muttei saanut lainkaan apua, vaikka hän jatkoi osmaneja vastaan taistelemista Rodopien itäosassa. Aigeianmeren alue oli turkkilaisten hallussa ja he ryöstelivät sen saaria.
 Bithynian turkkilainen prinssi Orhan meni naimisiin keisari Johannes VI Kantakuzenoksen tyttären Theodoran kanssa. Kreikkalainen papisto uskoi, että kristityn prinsessan ja huomattavan muslimin välinen avioliitto vahvistaisi aluetta. Prinssillä oli jo useita muita vaimoja, ja vaikka Theodoran annettiin pitää uskontonsa, hänen täytyi viettää loput elämästään islamilaisessa haaremissa. Kantakuzenos toivoi, että Orhanista tulisi hänen liittolaisensa tulevissa sodissa, mutta muiden turkkilaisten tavoin Orhan asettui häntä vastaan genovalaissodassa. Liittoon kuului se, että osmaniprinssi sai myidä Konstantinopolissa vangitsemiaan kristittyjä orjina julkisilla markkinoilla.
 Keski-Eurooppa
 11. heinäkuuta 1346 Luxemburgin Kaarle IV valittiin Pyhän saksalais-roomalaisen keisarikunnan hallitsijaksi. Hänen isänsä ja paavi Klemens VI:n, keisari Ludvig IV:n vankkumattoman vihollisen, välisen liiton vuoksi osa prinsseistä valitsi Kaarlen Ludvigin antikuninkaaksi Rhensissä. Hän oli aiemmin luvannut palvelevansa Klemensiä, hän vahvisti paavinistuimen hallintaoikeuden suuriin maa-alueisiin, lupasi kumota Ludvigin Klemensiä vastaan laatimat asetukset, lupasi olla puuttumatta Italian tapahtumiin ja puolustaa ja suojella kirkkoa.
 Kaarle IV oli hyvin heikossa asemassa Saksassa. Valintansa ehtojen vuoksi jotkut kutsuivat häntä halveksuen "paavin kuninkaaksi" (). Monet piispat ja lähes kaikki keisarilliset kaupungit pysyivät uskollisina Ludvig Baijerilaiselle. Kaarle vaaransi asemansa myös tukemalla häviävää osapuolta satavuotisessa sodassa. Hän menetti isänsä ja monet parhaista ritareistaan Crécyn taistelussa elokuussa 1346. Hän itse haavoittui samalla taistelukentällä.
 Samaan aikaan Italiassa useat pankit menivät Firenzessä vararikkoon kaupungin sisäisten ongelmien vuoksi. Tapahtumiin vaikutti myös se, että kuningas Edvard III ei maksanut osaa lainoistaan takaisin. Huomattavin vararikon tekijä vuonna 1346 oli Bardin suku. Italia kärsi myös nälänhädästä, minkä vuoksi paavin oli vaikea kerätä joukkoja hyökätäkseen Smyrnaan. Venetsialaiset kuitenkin rakensivat usean eurooppalaisen tahon liittouman (Sancta Unio), joka koostui pääosin temppeliherroista ja joka teki viisi perättäistä hyökkäystä Smyrnaan eli İzmiriin ja Länsi-Anatolian rannikolle, jota turkkilaiset pitivät hallussaan. Teknologian alalla paperin valmistustaito saapui Hollantiin ja tuliaseet saapuivat Pohjois-Saksaan. Varhaisimmat merkinnät kertovat, että niitä oli Aachenissa.
 Länsi-Eurooppa
 7. heinäkuuta tai niillä tienoin kuningas Edvard III ylitti Englannin kanaalin Normandiaan 1 600 laivan voimin. Hän valloitti La Hoguen ja Barfleurin satamat musertavalla voimalla ja jatkoi sisämaahan kohti Caenia ottaen haltuunsa kaupunkeja matkan varrella. Ranskalaiset asettuivat puolustamaan Caenia mutta hävisivät taistelun. He olivat suunnitelleet kanaalin ylittämistä ja Englannin valloittamista noin 14 000 miehen voimin Jean le Francin johdossa, mutta Edvardin hyökkäys pakotti heidät puolustuskannalle.
 Ranskan kuningas Filip VI tuhosi useita siltoja estääkseen Edvardin joukkoja etenemästä, mutta englantilaiset valloittivat Poissyn kaupungin elokuussa ja korjasivat sen sillan jatkaakseen. Ranskan kuningas asettui jälleen puolustusasemiin lähellä Crécyn metsää, mutta hävisi jälleen englantilaisille. Edvard jatkoi sitten Calais'hin ja piiritti kaupunkia 4. syyskuuta alkaen. Samaan aikaan Filipin poika Juhana piiritti Aigullonin kaupunkia onnistumatta kuitenkaan valtaamaan sitä. Kuningas Filip kehotti myös skotlantilaisia jatkamaan taisteluaan Englantia vastaan pohjoisessa. Skotit ajattelivat englantilaisten olevan kiinni Calais'ssa ja marssivat Englantiin kohti Durhamia lokakuussa, mutta englantilainen ritareista ja papistosta koostuva joukko voitti heidät ja Skotlannin kuningas Daavid II vangittiin. Myös irlantilaiset aloittivat lyhytaikaisen vastarintataistelun, mutta heidätkin voitettiin. Vuoden loppuun mennessä Edvard oli saanut haltuunsa myös Poitersin kaupungin ja Tonnay-Charentea ympäröivät kaupungit.
 Edvard Musta prinssi kunnioitti Böömin kuninkaan Juhana Luxemburgilaisen rohkeutta Crécyn taistelussa ottamalla käyttöön hänen vaakunansa ja tunnuslauseensa: "Ich Dien" eli "Minä palvelen". Juhana oli jo tehnyt nimensä tunnetuksi koko Euroopassa taisteltuaan sodissa vuosikymmenten ajan, ja hänen kuolemastaan Crécyssä tuli lukuisten kirjoitusten legendaarinen aihe. Esimerkiksi seuraava Froissartin teksti kertoo hänestä:
 Syntyneitä
 20. heinäkuuta – Margaret Plantagenet, Pembroken herttuatar ja kuningas Edvard III:n tytär (k. 1361)
 ajankohtaa ei tunneta
 Eustache Deschamps, ranskalainen runoilija (k. 1406 tai noin 1407)
 Grigor Tatevilainen, armenialainen munkki, filosofi ja taiteilija (k. 1409)
 Kuolleita
 10. helmikuuta – siunattu Clare Riminiläinen (s. 1282)
 28. maaliskuuta – Venturino Bergamolainen, dominikaanisaarnaaja (s. 1304)
 Elokuu tai syyskuu – Muhammad Aytimur, Sabzewarin sarbadarien hallitsija
 26. elokuuta – Crécyn taistelussa kaatuivat:
 Kaarle II (Alençon) (s. 1297)
 Ludvig I (Flanderi) (s. 1304)
 Juhana I (Böömi) (s. 1296)
 Rudolf (Lothringen) (s. 1320)
 17. lokakuuta – Neville's Crossin taistelussa kaatuivat:
 John Randolph, Morayn kolmas jaarli
 Maurice de Moravia, Strathearnin jaarli
 14. marraskuuta – Ostasio I da Polenta, Ravennan lordi (salamurhattiin)
 27. marraskuuta – pyhä Grigori Siinailainen (s. noin 1260)
 ajankohtaa ei tunneta
 Eustace Folville, englantilainen lainsuojaton
 Hélion de Villeneuve, Johanniittain ritarikunnan suurmestari
 Lähteet
 Aiheesta muualla
 1300-luku


text:
 Avis juridique important
 |
 11957A/PRO/CJ/39
 TRAITE INSTITUANT LA COMMUNAUTE EUROPEENNE DE L' ENERGIE ATOMIQUE ( C.E.E.A. - EURATOM ), PROTOCOLE SUR LE STATUT DE LA COUR DE JUSTICE DE LA COMMUNAUTE EUROPEENNE DE L' ENERGIE ATOMIQUE, TITRE TROISIEME - PROCEDURE, ARTICLE 39
 ++++ARTICLE 39 LORSQUE LA PARTIE DEFENDERESSE, REGULIEREMENT MISE EN CAUSE, S'ABSTIENT DE DEPOSER DES CONCLUSIONS ECRITES, L'ARRET EST RENDU PAR DEFAUT A SON EGARD . L'ARRET EST SUSCEPTIBLE D'OPPOSITION DANS LE DELAI D'UN MOIS A COMPTER DE SA NOTIFICATION . SAUF DECISION CONTRAIRE DE LA COUR, L'OPPOSITION NE SUSPEND PAS L'EXECUTION DE L'ARRET RENDU PAR DEFAUT .


jurisdiction: US

text:
 116 S2199 IS: Insulin Price Reduction Act
 U.S. Senate
 2019-07-22
 text/xml
 EN
 Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.
 II
 116th CONGRESS1st Session
 S. 2199
 IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
 July 22, 2019
 Mrs. Shaheen (for herself, Ms. Collins, Mr. Carper, and Mr. Cramer) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance
 A BILL
 To provide patient protections with respect to the cost of insulin.
 1.Short title
 This Act may be cited as the Insulin Price Reduction Act.
 2.Insulin price protections
 (a)In generalSubpart II of part A of title XXVII of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 300gg–11 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following:
 2729A.Insulin price protections
 (a)Contracting requirements
 (1)In general
 (A)RequirementExcept as provided in subparagraph (B), a group health plan or a health insurance issuer offering group or individual health insurance coverage shall not, and shall ensure that any entity that provides pharmacy benefits management services under a contract with any such health plan or health insurance coverage does not, directly or indirectly, receive from a manufacturer of certified insulin a rebate, reduction in price, or other remuneration with respect to such insulin received by an enrollee in the plan or coverage and covered by the plan or coverage.
 (B)ExceptionThe requirement under subparagraph (A) shall not apply to— (i)any such reduction in price that is reflected at the point of sale to the enrollee; or
 (ii)any remuneration that is a flat fee-based service fee that a manufacturer of such insulin pays to a pharmacy benefit manager for services rendered to the manufacturer that relate to arrangements by the pharmacy benefit manager to provide pharmacy benefit management services to a health plan or health insurance issuer, if certain conditions established by the Secretary are met, including requirements that the fees are transparent to the health plan or health insurance issuer.
 (2)ApplicabilityThe restriction under paragraph (1) shall apply with respect to insulin described in paragraph (1), for which the manufacturer has certified the list price in accordance with section 5(b) of the Insulin Price Reduction Act with respect to—
 (A)any plan year in which the list price for insulin is certified under section 5(b)(2)(A) of the Insulin Price Reduction Act; and (B)each subsequent plan year during which the manufacturer limits any increase in the list price to the price that gave rise to the restriction under paragraph (1), adjusted by not more than the price change in the medical care component of the consumer price index for all urban consumers (U.S. city average), as certified under section 5(b)(2)(B) of the Insulin Price Reduction Act.
 (b)Deductible limitationA group health plan or a health insurance issuer offering group or individual health insurance coverage shall not apply any deductible amount that otherwise is applicable to prescription drugs with respect to coverage of certified insulin under such plan or coverage, during the period described in subsection (a)(2).
 (c)Hold harmlessIn the first 2 plan years during which paragraph (1) applies with respect to an insulin certified under section 5(b) of the Insulin Price Reduction Act, a group health plan or a health insurance issuer offering group or individual health insurance coverage shall not, and shall ensure that any entity that provides pharmacy benefits management services under a contract with such health plan or health insurance coverage does not—
 (1)remove such insulin from the formulary applicable to the plan or coverage;
 (2)impose higher cost-sharing with respect to such insulin than the cost-sharing that applied with respect to the insulin in the year in which the list price reduction certification was provided under section 5(b)(2)(A) of the Insulin Price Reduction Act;
 (3)impose any prior authorization requirements for coverage of such insulin that were not applied during the year in which the list price reduction certification was provided under such section 5(b)(2)(A); or
 (4)establish a step therapy requirement for such insulin that was not applied during the year in which the list price reduction certification was provided under such section 5(b)(2)(A).
 (d)DefinitionsIn this section— (1)the term certified insulin means, with respect to a year, insulin that has been certified under section 5(b) of the Insulin Price Reduction Act for the year;
 (2)the term insulin means any insulin product approved by the Food and Drug Administration to improve glycemic control in patients with diabetes mellitus;
 (3)the term list price has the meaning given the term wholesale acquisition cost in section 1847A(c)(6)(B) of the Social Security Act; and (4)the term rebate means any discount, price concession, or fee, other than the fee described in section (a)(1)(B), the terms of which are fixed at the time of the sale and disclosed, but which is not received at the time of the sale..
 (b)Conforming amendmentParagraph (2) of section 223(d) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by redesignating subparagraph (D) as subparagraph (E) and by inserting after subparagraph (C) the following new subparagraph:
 (D)Safe harbor for absence of deductible for insulinA plan shall not fail to be treated as a high deductible health plan by reason of exempting insulin from any deductible pursuant to section 2729A(b) of the Public Health Service Act during the period described in section 2729A(a)(2) of such Act..
 (c)Effective dateThe amendments made by subsections (a) and (b) shall take effect with respect to plan years beginning on or after January 1, 2022.
 3.Insulin price protections under Medicare part DSection 1860D–4 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395w–104) is amended— (1)by redesignating the subsection (m) as added by section 6063(c) of the SUPPORT for Patients and Communities Act (Public Law 115–271) as subsection (n); and
 (2)by adding at the end the following new subsection:
 (o)Limitation on rebates, price reductions, or other remuneration for certified insulin
 (1)Limitation
 (A)In generalSubject to subparagraphs (B) and (C), for plan year 2022 and subsequent plan years, a PDP sponsor and a Medicare Advantage organization shall ensure that each prescription drug plan or MA–PD plan offered by the sponsor or organization, and any entity that provides pharmacy benefits management services under a contract with the prescription drug plan or MA–PD plan offered by the sponsor or organization, does not, directly or indirectly, receive from a manufacturer of certified insulin a rebate, reduction in price, or other remuneration with respect to certified insulin that is covered by the plan.
 (B)ExceptionThe requirement under subparagraph (A) shall not apply to— (i)any such reduction in price that is reflected at the point of sale to the beneficiary; or
 (ii)any remuneration that is a flat fee-based service fee that a manufacturer of such certified insulin pays to a pharmacy benefit manager for services rendered to the manufacturer that relate to arrangements by the pharmacy benefit manager to provide pharmacy benefit management services to a prescription drug plan or MA–PD plan, if certain conditions established by the Secretary are met, including requirements that the fees are transparent to the prescription drug plan or MA–PD plan.
 (C)Hold harmless for first 2 years that an insulin is certifiedIn the first 2 plan years during which paragraph (2) applies with respect to a certified insulin, a PDP sponsor and a Medicare Advantage organization shall not, and shall ensure that any entity that provides pharmacy benefits management services under a contract with such sponsor or organization does not—
 (i)remove such insulin from the formulary applicable to the prescription drug plan or MA–PD plan;
 (ii)impose higher cost-sharing with respect to such insulin than the cost-sharing that applied with respect to the certified insulin in the year in which the list price reduction certification was provided under section 5(b)(2)(A) of the Insulin Price Reduction Act;
 (iii)impose any prior authorization requirements for coverage of the certified insulin that were not applied during the year in which the list price reduction certification was provided under such section 5(b)(2)(A); or
 (iv)establish a step therapy requirement for the certified insulin that was not applied during the year in which the list price reduction certification was provided under such section 5(b)(2)(A).
 (2)DefinitionsIn this section: (A)Certified insulinThe term certified insulin means, with respect to a year, insulin that has been certified under section 5(b) of the Insulin Price Reduction Act for the year.
 (B)InsulinThe term insulin means any insulin product approved by the Food and Drug Administration to improve glycemic control in patients with diabetes mellitus.
 (C)List priceThe term list price has the meaning given the term wholesale acquisition cost in section 1847A(c)(6)(B). (D)RebateThe term rebate means any discount, price concession, or fee, other than the fee described in paragraph (1)(B), the terms of which are fixed at the time of the sale and disclosed, but which is not received at the time of the sale..
 4.Applicability of pre-list price reduction AMP to Medicaid minimum rebate amountsSection 1927(c) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396r–8(c)) is amended— (1)in paragraph (1)(A), in the matter preceding clause (i), by inserting and paragraph (5) after paragraph (2);
 (2)in paragraph (3)(A), in the matter preceding clause (i), by inserting and paragraph (5) after subparagraph (C); and (3)by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
 (5)Special rule for determining minimum basic rebates for insulin
 (A)In generalIn determining the amount of the rebate specified in this subsection for a dosage form and strength of a covered outpatient drug described in subparagraph (B) for any rebate period occurring after April 30, 2020, paragraph (1)(A)(ii)(II) or paragraph (3)(A)(i) (as applicable) shall be applied by substituting—
 (i)the pre-reduction average manufacturer price (as defined in subparagraph (C)) for the dosage form and strength of the drug for the rebate period; for
 (ii)the average manufacturer price for the dosage form and strength of the drug for the rebate period.
 (B)Drugs describedA covered outpatient drug is described in this subparagraph for a rebate period if the drug is insulin for which, throughout such rebate period, the manufacturer has certified the list price for each dosage form and strength of such drug in accordance with section 5(b) of the Insulin Price Reduction Act.
 (C)Pre-reduction average manufacturer priceFor purposes of this paragraph, the term pre-reduction average manufacturer price means, with respect to each dosage form and strength of a covered outpatient drug described in subparagraph (B) and a rebate period—
 (i)the average manufacturer price for such drug for the calendar quarter beginning July 1, 2019; increased by
 (ii)the percentage by which the consumer price index for all urban consumers (United States city average) for the month before the month in which the rebate period begins exceeds such index for September 2019.
 .
 5.List price data submissions
 (a)Initial submission
 (1)In generalNot later than April 30, 2020, any manufacturer of insulin wishing to receive certification under this section shall submit to the Secretary—
 (A)data on the list price of any insulin manufactured by the manufacturer during the period beginning on January 1, 2000 (or the first date on which such manufacturer begins manufacturing such insulin), through the list price applicable at the time of the report; and
 (B)a certification that such data is accurate. (2)Later submissionsAny manufacturer of insulin that does not submit the information described in paragraph (1) by the date described in such paragraph may later submit the information described in subparagraphs (A) and (B) of paragraph (1) to the Secretary. Such a manufacturer who submits such information pursuant to this paragraph is eligible to certify its list price for the applicable insulin under subsection (b)(2)(A)(ii) with respect to the first plan year that begins at least 15 months after the date of submission under this paragraph.
 (b)Annual price certification
 (1)In generalAny manufacturer of insulin who submits information in accordance with subsection (a) is eligible for certification under this subsection.
 (2)Requirements
 (A)First certification
 (i)Initial eligibility for certificationA manufacturer of insulin who submits information under subsection (a)(1) is considered certified under this subsection for plan year 2022 if such manufacturer, not later than September 30, 2020, submits to the Secretary a certification that the manufacturer reduced its list price for insulin to an amount that is no greater than the list price for the same insulin that applied as of July 1, 2006.
 (ii)Later certificationA manufacturer of insulin that submitted information under subsection (a)(2) not later than September 30 of the calendar year that is 2 years prior to the applicable plan year, is considered certified under this subsection for the applicable plan year if such manufacturer submits to the Secretary a certification, not later than September 30 of such calendar year, that the manufacturer reduced its list price for insulin to the amount that is no greater than the list price for the same insulin that applied as of July 1, 2006, increased by not more than the rate by which the medical care component of the consumer price index for all urban consumers (U.S. city average) increased between September 30, 2020, and the date on which the certification is submitted.
 (B)Subsequent certificationFor plan year 2023 and each plan year thereafter, a manufacturer of insulin who previously submitted a certification under clause (i) or (ii) of subparagraph (A) is considered certified under this subsection for the applicable plan year if such manufacturer submits, not later than September 30 of the calendar year that is 2 years prior to the applicable plan year, a certification that the manufacturer did not increase the list price for insulin previously certified under clause (i) or (ii) of subparagraph (A), by more than the rate by which the medical care component of the consumer price index for all urban consumers (U.S. city average) increased since the initial certification under such clause (i) or (ii).
 (3)Special rule for certain insulin
 (A)In generalIn the case of a manufacturer of insulin that did not manufacture a particular insulin in 2006, such manufacturer may be certified under this subsection with respect to such insulin by submitting information under paragraph (2)(A) certifying that the list price of such insulin is no greater than the weighted average list price, in 2006, of, as applicable—
 (i)(I)all short-acting insulins; (II)all rapid-acting insulins; or
 (III)all long-acting insulins; or (ii)such other insulin categories, as the Secretary determines appropriate.
 (B)IncreaseThe weighted averages under subparagraph (A) shall be increased in accordance with paragraph (2)(A)(ii), as applicable.
 (4)Application to authorized generic insulinIn the case of an insulin that is classified as an authorized generic drug, as defined in section 505(t)(3) of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 355(t)(3)), the manufacturer of such insulin may be certified under this section by submitting information under paragraph (1)(A) certifying that the list price of such authorized generic insulin is no greater than the list price, as of July 1, 2006, of the listed drug insulin product upon which the authorized generic drug was based under section 505(t) of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act. The certification pursuant to this paragraph applies only to the authorized generic drug insulin, and does not apply with respect to the applicable listed drug insulin.
 (c)Audits and penaltiesThe Inspector General of the Department of Health and Human Services may audit the financial records and other relevant records of any manufacturer submitting data under subsections (a) and (b), and any manufacturer or officer, director, agent, or managing employee of such manufacturer that knowingly submits false or incomplete data shall be subject to a civil penalty for each insulin for which false or incomplete data are submitted in an amount not to exceed the greater of—
 (1)an amount equal to 2 times the total amount of rebates paid by the manufacturer to State Medicaid plans for the insulin for rebate periods occurring in calendar year 2018 under section 1927 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396r–8); or
 (2)an alternative amount to be determined by the Secretary. (d)DefinitionsIn this section—
 (1)the term insulin means any insulin product approved by the Food and Drug Administration to improve glycemic control in patients with diabetes mellitus;
 (2)the term list price has the meaning given the term wholesale acquisition cost in section 1847A(c)(6)(B) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395w–3a(c)(6)(B)); and (3)the term Secretary means the Secretary of Health and Human Services.


text:
 Avis juridique important
 |
 51999SC1074
 Utkast till gemensamma EES-kommitténs beslut om ändring av protokoll 31 (om samarbete inom särskilda områden vid sidan om de fyra friheterna) till EES-avtalet - Utkast till gemenskapens gemensamma ståndpunkt /* SEK/99/01074 slutlig */
 Utkast till GEMENSAMMA EES-KOMMITTÉNS BESLUT om ändring av protokoll 31 (om samarbete inom särskilda områden vid sidan om de fyra friheterna) till EES-avtalet - Utkast till gemenskapens gemensamma ståndpunkt - (framlagt av kommissionen)MOTIVERING1. Protokoll 31 till EES-avtalet innehåller särskilda bestämmelser om samarbetet mellan gemenskapen och EFTA/EES-länderna vid sidan av de fyra friheterna.2. Syftet med det bifogade utkastet till Gemensamma EES-kommitténs beslut är att ändra protokoll 31 så att samarbetet beträffande informationstjänster och informationssystemens säkerhet uppdateras. I utkastet anges ramarna för samarbetet beträffande gemenskapens fleråriga handlingsprogram för att främja en säkrare användning av Internet genom att bekämpa olagligt och skadligt innehåll på globala nät. Syftet är att EFTA/EES-länderna fullt ut skall kunna delta i gemenskapens handlingsprogram.3. I artikel 1.3 b i rådets förordning (EG) nr 2894/94 om formerna för genomförandet av avtalet om Europeiska ekonomiska samarbetsområdet föreskrivs att rådet på förslag från kommissionen skall fastställa gemenskapens ståndpunkt när det gäller sådana beslut.4. Utkastet till Gemensamma EES-kommitténs beslut överlämnas till rådet för godkännande. Kommissionen hoppas kunna lägga fram gemenskapens ståndpunkt för Gemensamma EES-kommittén i juli eller september 1999.Utkast till GEMENSAMMA EES-KOMMITTÉNS BESLUT om ändring av protokoll 31 (om samarbete inom särskilda områden vid sidan om de fyra friheterna) till EES-avtaletGEMENSAMMA EES-KOMMITTÉN HAR BESLUTAT FÖLJANDE med beaktande av avtalet om Europeiska ekonomiska samarbetsområdet, ändrat genom protokollet med justeringar av avtalet om Europeiska ekonomiska samarbetsområdet, nedan kallat "avtalet", särskilt artiklarna 86 och 98 i detta, ochav följande skäl:Protokoll 31 till avtalet ändrades genom Gemensamma EES-kommitténs beslut nr ... av den ... [1].[1] EGT L Det är lämpligt att utöka samarbetet mellan de avtalsslutande partnerna i avtalet till att inbegripa en flerårig handlingsplan på gemenskapsnivå för att främja en säkrare användning av Internet genom att bekämpa olagligt och skadligt innehåll på globala nät (Europaparlamentets och rådets beslut nr 276/1999/EG [2]).[2] EGT L 33, 6.2.1999, s. 1.Protokoll 31 till avtalet bör därför ändras så att detta utökade samarbete kan äga rum från och med den 1 januari 1999.HÄRIGENOM FÖRESKRIVS FÖLJANDE.Artikel 1Följande nya strecksats skall läggas till i artikel 2.5 i protokoll 31 till avtalet:"- 399 D 0276: Europaparlamentets och rådets beslut nr 276/1999/EG av den 25 januari 1999 om antagande av en flerårig handlingsplan på gemenskapsnivå för att främja en säkrare användning av Internet genom att bekämpa olagligt och skadligt innehåll på globala nät (EGT L 33, 6.2.1999, s. 1)".Artikel 2Detta beslut träder i kraft den under förutsättning att alla anmälningar enligt artikel 103.1 i avtalet har gjorts till Gemensamma EES-kommittén. Beslutet skall gälla från och med den 1 januari 1999.Artikel 3Detta beslut skall offentliggöras i EES-delen av och EES-supplementet till Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning. Utfärdat i Bryssel den 1999.På Gemensamma EES-kommitténs vägnar OrdförandeSekreterarna förGemensamma EES-kommittén


text:
 9.5.2008
 RO
 Jurnalul Oficial al Uniunii Europene
 C 116/6
 Hotărârea Curții (Camera a treia) din 13 martie 2008 (cerere de pronunțare a unei hotărâri preliminare formulată de Raad van State — Regatul Țărilor de Jos) — Vereniging Nationaal Overlegorgaan Sociale Werkvoorziening (C-383/06), Gemeente Rotterdam (C-384/06)/Minister van Sociale Zaken en Werkgelegenheid și Sociaal Economische Samenwerking West-Brabant (C-385/06)/Algemene Directie voor de Arbeidsvoorziening
 (Cauzele conexate C-383/06-C-385/06) (1)
 (Fonduri structurale - Articolul 23 alineatul (1) din Regulamentul (CEE) nr. 4253/88 - Întreruperea și recuperarea asistenței financiare comunitare - Articolul 249 CE - Protecția încrederii legitime și a securității juridice)
 (2008/C 116/10)
 Limba de procedură: olandeza
 Instanța de trimitere
 Raad van State
 Părțile din acțiunea principală
 Reclamanți: Vereniging Nationaal Overlegorgaan Sociale Werkvoorziening (C-383/06), Gemeente Rotterdam (C-384/06), Sociaal Economische Samenwerking West-Brabant (C-385/06)
 Pârâți: Minister van Sociale Zaken en Werkgelegenheid, Algemene Directie voor de Arbeidsvoorziening
 Obiectul
 Cerere de pronunțare a unei hotărâri preliminare — Nederlandse Raad van State — Interpretarea articolului 23 alineatul (1) din Regulamentul (CEE) nr. 4253/88 al Consiliului din 19 decembrie 1988 de aplicare a Regulamentului (CEE) nr. 2052/88 în ceea ce privește coordonarea colaborării între diferite fonduri structurale, pe de o parte, și între acestea și cele ale Băncii Europene de Investiții și ale altor instrumente financiare existente — Întreruperea și recuperarea asistenței financiare comunitare — Articolele 10 CE și 249 CE — Aplicarea principiilor generale de drept comunitar
 Dispozitivul
 1)
 Articolul 23 alineatul (1) din Regulamentul (CEE) nr. 4253/88 al Consiliului din 19 decembrie 1988 de aplicare a Regulamentului (CEE) nr. 2052/88 în ceea ce privește coordonarea colaborării între diferite fonduri structurale, pe de o parte, și între acestea și cele ale Băncii Europene de Investiții și ale altor instrumente financiare existente, astfel cum a fost modificat prin Regulamentul (CEE) nr. 2082/93 al Consiliului din 20 iulie 1993, creează o obligație pentru statele membre, fără a fi necesară o abilitare prevăzută de dreptul național, de recuperare a fondurilor pierdute ca urmare a unui abuz sau a unei neglijențe.
 2)
 Recuperarea fondurilor pierdute ca urmare a unui abuz sau a unei neglijențe trebuie să se efectueze în temeiul articolului 23 alineatul (1) din Regulamentul nr. 4253/88, astfel cum a fost modificat prin Regulamentul nr. 2082/93, și în conformitate cu modalitățile din dreptul național, sub rezerva ca aplicarea acestui drept să nu aducă atingere aplicării și eficacității dreptului comunitar și să nu aibă ca efect faptul că recuperarea sumelor ilegal acordate devine practic imposibilă. Este de competența instanței naționale să asigure pe deplin aplicarea dreptului comunitar, îndepărtând sau interpretând, în măsura necesară, un act normativ național precum legea generală privind dreptul administrativ (Algemene wet bestuursrecht), care i s ar putea opune. Instanța națională poate pune în aplicare principiile comunitare ale securității juridice și protecției încrederii legitime în aprecierea comportamentului atât al beneficiarilor fondurilor pierdute, cât și al autorităților administrative, cu condiția ca interesul Comunității să fie pe deplin luat în considerare. Calitatea de persoană publică a beneficiarului fondurilor nu are nicio incidență în această privință.
 (1) JO C 310, 16.12.2006.