text:
29.10.2005
 DA
 Den Europæiske Unions Tidende
 C 271/24
 Sag anlagt den 25. august 2005 — AstraZeneca AB (Södertälje, Sverige) mod Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber
 (Sag T-321/05)
 (2005/C 271/47)
 Processprog: engelsk
 Parter
 Sagsøgere:
 AstraZeneca AB (Södertälje, Sverige) og AstraZeneca plc (London, Det Forenede Kongerige) [ved M. Brealey, QC, M. Hoskins, barrister, F. Murphy, solicitor]
 Sagsøgte:
 Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber
 Sagsøgernes påstande
 —
 Kommissionens beslutning af 15. juli 2005 om en procedure i henhold til EF-traktatens artikel 82 og artikel 54 i EØS-aftalen (sag COMP/A.37.507/F3 — AstraZeneca).
 —
 Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber tilpligtes at betale sagens omkostninger.
 Søgsmålsgrunde og væsentligste argumenter
 Ved den anfægtede beslutning pålagde Kommissionen begge sagsøgere en bøde på 46 000 000 EUR og den første sagsøger blev derudover pålagt en bøde på 14 000 000 EUR for overtrædelse af artikel 82 EF og artikel 54 i aftalen om Det Europæiske Økonomiske Samarbejdsområde. Kommissionen konstaterede, at sagsøgerne i begyndelsen af 1993 indledte et mønster med bevidst at vildlede patentadvokater, nationale domstole samt patentmyndigheder for at opnå supplerende beskyttelsescertifikater — som de var klar over, at de ikke var berettigede til — for sagsøgernes patentbeskyttede produkt »omeprazole«, som er det aktive stof i sagsøgernes lægemiddel »Losec«. Kommissionen konstaterede også, at sagsøgernes strategi i 1998 og 1999 bestod i på selektiv vis at trække deres »Losec«-kapsler tilbage og erstatte dem med »Losec«-tabletter samt at anmode om, at markedsføringstilladelsen for kapslerne i Danmark, Norge og Sverige blev tilbagekaldt. Det antages i beslutningen, at begge overtrædelser blev begået med den hensigt illoyalt at begrænse konkurrencen fra generiske produkter og fra parallelimporterede varer.
 Sagsøgerne anfægter Kommissionens beslutning på adskillige punkter. De har for det første gjort gældende, at Kommissionen fejlagtigt har defineret det relevante marked som alene bestående af syrepumpehæmmere, der anvendes til behandling af mave- og tarmsyrelidelser, og har udelukket producenter af histamin-H2-receptor-antagonister fra det relevante marked. Denne vurdering havde også indflydelse på Kommissionens vurdering vedrørende dominans, da det ifølge sagsøgerne ikke blev vurderet i den bestridte beslutning, om sagsøgerne fortsat ville være i en dominerende stilling, hvis histamin-H2-receptor-antagonister blev anset som en del af det relevante marked.
 Sagsøgerne har endvidere både faktisk og retligt anfægtet Kommissionens vurderinger vedrørende overtrædelse. Med hensyn til de påståede vildledende oplysninger om patenterne har sagsøgerne gjort gældende, at sådanne vildledende oplysninger afgivet i forbindelse med ansøgninger om intellektuelle ejendomsrettigheder ikke juridisk kan udgøre misbrug, medmindre og indtil de rettigheder, der er opnået på uærlig vis, kan eller vil blive håndhævet. Sagsøgerne har også gjort gældende, at artikel 82 EF — fortolket korrekt — ikke pålagde dem en forpligtelse til at opretholde en markedsføringstilladelse for et produkt, som de ikke længere markedsførte, alene fordi det ville gøre det nemmere for generiske produkter og parallelimportører at konkurrere med produktet.
 Sagsøgerne har også anfægtet Kommissionens vurderinger vedrørende de faktiske omstændigheder i forbindelse med begge overtrædelser. De har gjort gældende, at Kommissionen ikke har fremlagt bevis for, at den har anvendt det rigtige retlige kriterium for det påståede misbrug af intellektuelle ejendomsrettigheder, og at der ikke forelå nogen strategi for på selektiv vis at skifte fra »Losec«-kapsler til tabletter eller på selektiv vis at tilbagekalde markedsføringstilladelser for kapslerne.


type: caselaw

jurisdiction: EU

text:
 19.7.2008
 DE
 Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union
 C 183/27
 Klage, eingereicht am 22. Mai 2008 — JOOP!/HABM (Darstellung eines Ausrufezeichens)
 (Rechtssache T-191/08)
 (2008/C 183/51)
 Verfahrenssprache: Deutsch
 Parteien
 Klägerin: JOOP! GmbH (Hamburg, Deutschland) (Prozessbevollmächtigte: Rechtsanwälte H. Schmidt-Hollburg, W. Möllering, A. Löhde, H. Leo, A. Witte, T. Frank, A. Theil, H.-P. Rühland, B. Willers und T. Rein)
 Beklagter: Harmonisierungsamt für den Binnenmarkt (Marken, Muster und Modelle)
 Anträge der Klägerin
 —
 Die Entscheidung der Ersten Beschwerdekammer des Harmonisierungsamtes für den Binnenmarkt vom 6. März 2008 in der Rechtssache R 1822/2007-1 aufzuheben;
 —
 dem Harmonisierungsamt für den Binnenmarkt die Kosten des Verfahrens einschließlich der im Laufe des Beschwerdeverfahrens angefallenen Kosten aufzuerlegen.
 Klagegründe und wesentliche Argumente
 Betroffene Gemeinschaftsmarke: eine Bildmarke, die ein Ausrufezeichen darstellt, für Waren der Klassen 14, 18 und 25 (Anmeldung Nr. 5 332 176).
 Entscheidung des Prüfers: Zurückweisung der Anmeldung.
 Entscheidung der Beschwerdekammer: Zurückweisung der Beschwerde.
 Klagegründe: Verstoß gegen Art. 7 Abs. 1 Buchst. b und c der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 40/94 (1), da die angemeldete Marke unterscheidungskräftig und nicht freihaltebedürftig sei.
 (1) Verordnung (EG) Nr. 40/94 des Rates vom 20. Dezember 1993 über die Gemeinschaftsmarke (ABl. 1994, L 11, S. 1).


text:
 15.1.2011
 LT
 Europos Sąjungos oficialusis leidinys
 C 13/28
 2010 m. spalio 15 d. pareikštas ieškinys byloje SNCF prieš VRDT — Infotrafic (infotrafic)
 (Byla T-491/10)
 ()
 2011/C 13/54
 Kalba, kuria surašytas ieškinys: prancūzų
 Šalys
 Ieškovė: Société nationale des chemins de fer français (SNCF) (Paryžius, Prancūzija), atstovaujama advokato H. Reynaud
 Atsakovė: Vidaus rinkos derinimo tarnyba (prekių ženklams ir pramoniniam dizainui)
 Kita procedūros Apeliacinėje taryboje šalis: Infotrafic SA (Ermonas, Prancūzija)
 Ieškovės reikalavimai
 —
 Pakeisti 2010 m. rugpjūčio 6 d. Vidaus rinkos derinimo tarnybos (prekių ženklams ir pramoniniam dizainui) apeliacinės tarybos sprendimo byloje R 1268/2009-2 16–23 punktus;
 —
 priteisti iš VRDT bylinėjimosi išlaidas.
 Ieškinio pagrindai ir pagrindiniai argumentai
 Įregistruotas Bendrijos prekių ženklas, dėl kurio pateiktas prašymas pripažinti jo registraciją negaliojančia: vaizdinis prekių ženklas „infotrafic“ 9, 16, 38, 39 ir 42 klasių prekėms ir paslaugoms, Bendrijos prekių ženklas Nr. 1 926 815.
 Bendrijos prekių ženklo savininkas: Infotrafic SA.
 Šalis, prašanti pripažinti Bendrijos prekių ženklo registraciją negaliojančia: ieškovė.
 Anuliavimo skyriaus sprendimas: atmesti prašymą pripažinti registraciją negaliojančia.
 Apeliacinės tarybos sprendimas: atmesti apeliaciją.
 Ieškinio pagrindai: Reglamento Nr. 207/2009 52 straipsnio ir 7 straipsnio 1 dalies b punkto pažeidimas, nes nagrinėjant kompleksinį Bendrijos prekių ženklą, kurio vienas elementų neturi skiriamojo požymio arba turi abejotiną skiriamąjį požymį, reikia vertinti kiekvieną elementą atskirai; motyvavimo pareigos pažeidimas.


type: other

jurisdiction: US

text: b' Office of Inspector General\n\n\n\n\nOctober 14, 2004\n\nMICHAEL GASPARD\nMANAGER, OKLAHOMA DISTRICT\n\nSUBJECT: Audit Report \xe2\x80\x93Self-Service Vending Program \xe2\x80\x93 Oklahoma District\n (Report Number DR-AR-05-001)\n\nThis is one of a series of audit reports on the Self-Service Vending Program in the\nSouthwest Area. The report presents the results of our self-initiated audit on the\nSelf-Service Vending Program in the Oklahoma District (Project Number\n04YG024DR002). The information in this district report will be included in a report to\nthe Southwest Area Vice President.\n\n Background\n\nThe Self-Service Vending Program, implemented in October 1964, is one of the Postal\nService\xe2\x80\x99s major programs. It provides Postal Service customers with a convenient\nalternative for purchasing stamps and other basic Postal Service products after\nbusiness hours and without the need to stand in line during business hours.\n\nNationwide, the Postal Service maintains approximately 30,000 vending machines\n(27,000 self-service postal centers and 3,000 other types of vending equipment) that\ngenerated over $1.9 billion in revenue during fiscal years (FY) 2001 through 2003.\nDuring FY 2003, the Southwest Area had 3,876 pieces of vending equipment\nthat generated over $87 million in revenue, of which the Oklahoma District\nmaintained 14 percent (533) of the total area machines that generated over 10 percent\n($8.7 million) of the total area vending revenue. During the first quarter of FY 2004, the\nSouthwest Area had 3,989 pieces1 of vending equipment that generated over\n$23 million in revenue, of which the Oklahoma District maintained 15 percent (5792) of\nthe total area machines that generated 10 percent ($2.2 million) of the total area\nvending revenue.\n\n\n\n\n1\n The Southwest Area had 113 additional vending machines during the first quarter of FY 2004.\n2\n The Oklahoma District had 46 additional vending machines during the first quarter of FY 2004.\n\n 1735 N Lynn St.\n Arlington, VA 22209-2020\n (703) 248-2100\n Fax: (703) 248-2256\n\x0cSelf-Service Vending Program \xe2\x80\x93 DR-AR-05-001\n Oklahoma District\n\n\n Objective, Scope, and Methodology\nThe objective of our audit was to determine whether the Self-Service Vending Program\nis effectively and efficiently meeting program goals of increasing revenue and reducing\noperating costs. Specifically, in this review, we determined whether Self-Service\nVending Program managers have effectively redeployed vending equipment that does\nnot meet minimum revenue requirements in order to maximize revenue, and\ndiscontinued the use of obsolete vending equipment. We also physically observed a\njudgmental sample of 20 vending machines to determine whether the machines were\noperational and easily accessible. For the 533 vending machines operating in the\nOklahoma District during FY 2003, 85 were classified as obsolete based on Postal\nService guidance, while the remaining 448 were classified as current equipment. For\nthe first quarter of FY 2004, 579 vending machines were operating in the Oklahoma\nDistrict, of which 97 were classified as obsolete, and the remaining 482 were classified\nas current equipment.\n\nDuring our audit, we visited Postal Service facilities; interviewed managers and\nemployees; reviewed documentation and applicable policies and procedures; and\nanalyzed data in the Postal Service\xe2\x80\x99s Vending Equipment Sales and Service System\n(VESS) for FY 2003 and the first quarter of FY 2004 to identify obsolete equipment and\nequipment that did not meet the minimum revenue requirements.3 Although we relied\non data obtained from VESS, we did not test the validity of the data and controls over\nthe system.\n\nAudit work associated with the Oklahoma District was conducted from July through\nOctober 2004, in accordance with generally accepted government auditing standards\nand included such tests of internal controls as were considered necessary under the\ncircumstances. We discussed our observations and conclusions with appropriate\nmanagement officials and included their comments, where appropriate.\n\n Prior Audit Coverage\nThe Office of Inspector General (OIG) has issued three reports related to the objective\nof this audit.\n\nSelf-Service Vending Program - Tennessee District (Report Number DR-AR-04-003,\nJune 30, 2004), Self-Service Vending Program - Alabama District (Report Number\nDR-AR-04-004, June 30, 2004), and Self-Service Vending Program - Atlanta District\n(Report Number DR-AR-04-002, July 1, 2004). The reports stated that district officials\ncould improve their process for redeploying vending equipment that does not meet\nminimum revenue requirements. In FY 2003, 54 percent (857 of 1,573) of the vending\nmachines in the Tennessee, Alabama, and Atlanta Districts did not meet the minimum\nrevenue requirements and the districts may have missed revenue opportunities of\n\n3\n Obsolete equipment was not included in the minimum revenue analysis.\n\n\n\n\n 2\n\x0cSelf-Service Vending Program \xe2\x80\x93 DR-AR-05-001\n Oklahoma District\n\n\napproximately $2.7 to $8.5 million by not redeploying this equipment. Additionally,\nthese districts continued to use 250 obsolete machines and possibly incurred\nmaintenance and repair expenses. Management agreed with all recommendations and\nthe actions taken and planned were responsive to the recommendations.\n\n Audit Results\nOpportunities exist for Oklahoma District officials to improve the effectiveness and\nefficiency of the Self-Service Vending Program and to meet or exceed program goals of\nincreasing revenue and reducing operating costs. Specifically, Oklahoma District\nofficials could increase revenue opportunities by redeploying equipment that does not\nmeet minimum revenue requirements. Further, Oklahoma District officials could\npossibly reduce maintenance and repair costs by discontinuing the use of obsolete\nequipment. Additionally, our physical observation of vending machines in the Oklahoma\nDistrict indicated that not all of the machines selected for review were operational or\naccessible.\n\nRedeployment of Vending Machines\n\nOklahoma District officials could improve their process for redeploying vending\nequipment that does not meet Postal Service\xe2\x80\x99s minimum revenue requirements.\nSpecifically, during FY 2003, our review of the vending equipment revenue reports\nindicated that 75 percent (336 of 448) did not meet the minimum revenue requirements.\nVending equipment sales were approximately $2.4 million, which was significantly\nless than the minimum revenue requirement of $5.4 million. As a result, the\nOklahoma District may have missed revenue opportunities of approximately\n$977,000 to $3.0 million by not redeploying this equipment.4\n\nAdditionally, in the first quarter of FY 2004, our review of the vending equipment\nrevenue reports indicated that 75 percent (360 of 482) did not meet the minimum\nrevenue requirements. Vending equipment sales were approximately $559,000, which\nwas significantly less than the minimum revenue requirement of $1.3 million. As a\nresult, the Oklahoma District may have missed revenue opportunities of approximately\n$750,000 by not redeploying this equipment.\n\nOne of the Self-Service Vending Program\xe2\x80\x99s goals is to increase revenue through the\nredeployment of equipment. The Postal Service should redeploy equipment that does\nnot meet minimum revenue requirements to other locations. Postal Service policy,\n\n4\n For each vending machine, we calculated the shortfall in revenue compared to the established minimum for a\nparticular machine type and referred to this shortfall as \xe2\x80\x9cmissed revenue opportunities.\xe2\x80\x9d The $977,000 represents the\nminimum total possible missed revenue opportunities after giving consideration to Postal Service guidance, which\nrequires district officials to review revenue reports and take appropriate actions if a vending machine\xe2\x80\x99s revenue does\nnot reach plan in three to six accounting periods. The $3 million represents the maximum total possible missed\nrevenue opportunities for FY 2003 and is calculated by subtracting actual revenues generated from the total of all\nmachine minimum revenue requirements.\n\n\n\n\n 3\n\x0cSelf-Service Vending Program \xe2\x80\x93 DR-AR-05-001\n Oklahoma District\n\n\nHandbook PO-102, Self-Service Vending Operational and Marketing Program,\nChapter 2, Section 256, May 1999 (updated with Postal Bulletin revisions through\nDecember 25, 2003), establishes the minimum revenue requirements for vending\nmachines. The district retail office is responsible for evaluating equipment revenue to\nfind the right location for the right machine. If self-service vending equipment is located\nin an area where it is unable to generate enough revenue to meet the minimum\nrequirement, the equipment must be considered for redeployment. If revenue does not\nmeet the minimum requirement in three to six accounting periods, the district retail office\nshould place the equipment on a list for redeployment; notify any office where changes\nwill be made; prepare a typewritten or computer-generated notice, approved through the\ndistrict retail office, to be posted in the lobby informing customers 30 days before\nremoving the equipment; and complete Postal Service (PS) Form 4805, Maintenance\nWork Order, and move the equipment to a better location.\n\nDistrict officials did not initiate redeployment action for the underperforming vending\nmachines during FY 2003 and the first quarter of FY 2004 because it was not cost\neffective since these machines were generating some revenue. Additionally, district\nofficials were concerned about the potential adverse impact to customer service if the\nmachines were moved. Previous attempts to redeploy underperforming equipment\nwere met with resistance from postmasters because the nonavailability of vending\nequipment would impact customer service in the locations. However, by not taking\naction to redeploy underperforming equipment, the district could miss revenue\nopportunities during the remainder of FY 2004.\n\nDistrict officials expressed that they did not have any concerns with the Postal Service\xe2\x80\x99s\nmethodology used to establish minimum revenue requirement; however, they consider\nthis criteria as guidance to manage the Self-Service Vending Program. District officials\nstated that although vending machines may not be meeting minimum revenue\nrequirements, they were generating some revenue and were available for customers.\n\nWe discussed the results with Oklahoma District officials and they agreed that they\ncould improve their redeployment process for equipment that does not meet the Postal\nService\xe2\x80\x99s minimum revenue requirements. District officials indicated that plans were\nbeing developed to relocate vending locations based on an analysis of vending\noperations and receipt of 25 automated postal centers.5\n\nRecommendation\n\nWe recommend the Manager, Oklahoma District, direct the Retail Manager to:\n\n1. Review revenue reports to identify underperforming equipment; notify postmasters of\n vending equipment that generates low revenue; and giving consideration to all\n\n\n5\n Automated postal centers are a newly developed kiosk that provides convenient 24-hour automated access to\npurchase stamps as well as many premium delivery services such as Express and Priority Mail.\n\n\n\n\n 4\n\x0cSelf-Service Vending Program \xe2\x80\x93 DR-AR-05-001\n Oklahoma District\n\n\n feasible alternatives, complete all necessary actions to redeploy underperforming\n equipment as often as possible.\n\nManagement\xe2\x80\x99s Comments\n\nManagement agreed with our finding and recommendation. The District Manager\nstated they can improve removing/relocating low performing machines in smaller\noffices. The District Manager instructed the Retail Manager to review the Equipment\nRelocation Analysis Report from VESS on a monthly basis to assess the opportunities\nand the impact of relocating equipment. In addition, management stated each site will\nbe reviewed on an individual basis to determine if the equipment needs to be removed\nor relocated. The retail manager will notify Managers of Post Office Operations\n(MPOOs)/Postmasters of low performing equipment. The MPOOs/Postmaster will be\ngiven the opportunity to respond in writing to the Retail Manager to present a business\ncase as to why the equipment should not be relocated or removed.\n\nHowever, management stated disagreement that the district may have missed revenue\nopportunities as they have attempted to place their vending machines where the\nmachines will have the highest traffic potential and that moving the machines would not\nguarantee they would produce the minimum revenue. Management\xe2\x80\x99s comments, in\ntheir entirety, are included in the appendix of this report.\n\nEvaluation of Management\xe2\x80\x99s Comments\n\nManagement\xe2\x80\x99s actions taken or planned are responsive to the recommendation and\nshould resolve the issue identified in this finding. Regarding management\xe2\x80\x99s\ndisagreement that they missed revenue opportunities, we determined that the term\nmissed revenue opportunities was appropriate as our audit focused on vending revenue\nas reported in VESS and as compared to established minimums. The Postal Service\nmeasures the performance of vending operations by considering revenue generated;\naccordingly, we believe the term missed revenue opportunities appropriately represents\nthe revenue-related performance measure within the confines of assessing individual\nmachines only.\n\nUse of Obsolete Equipment\n\nIn FY 2003, Oklahoma District officials continued to use 85 obsolete machines and\npossibly incurred maintenance and repair expenses, although Postal Service policy\ndiscontinued the maintenance and repair support for the machines in 2000.6 Our review\nof vending equipment revenue reports showed five of the machines met minimum\nrevenue requirements. Additionally, during the first quarter of FY 2004, our review of\n\n\n6\n This Maintenance Management Order (MMO) supplements MMO-018-96, June 21, 1996, Discontinuance of\nSupport for Obsolete Vending Machines. This MMO includes discontinuance of support for recently obsolete models\nof vending machines announced in the Material Logistics Bulletin (MLB-PP-00-004), issued on May 18, 2000.\n\n\n\n\n 5\n\x0cSelf-Service Vending Program \xe2\x80\x93 DR-AR-05-001\n Oklahoma District\n\n\nvending equipment revenue reports indicated that 97 percent (94 of 97) did not meet\nminimum revenue requirements.\n\nDistrict officials stated that they continued to use and maintain the obsolete equipment\nbecause removing the equipment would not be cost effective and because of concerns\nregarding the potential adverse impact on customer service since replacement\nequipment was not available. As a result, during FY 2003 and the first quarter of\nFY 2004, the district possibly incurred maintenance and repair expenses that may have\nexceeded the revenue generated by continuing to operate and maintain the obsolete\nmachines. We were unable to determine the amount of repair and maintenance\nexpenses associated with the machines because the Postal Service does not capture\nthe data for each machine.7\n\nPeriodically, the Postal Service lists vending equipment as obsolete, meaning that the\nequipment has exceeded its expected life cycle and will no longer receive support from\nmaintenance organizations. All inactive retail vending equipment items must be\nreported to the district material management specialist. When retail vending equipment\nitems are obsolete or listed as excess, the Postal Service may consider them for\ndisposal action. Parts from obsolete machines may be salvaged and stored for\nmaintenance or repair of other compatible equipment. In June 2000, Postal Service\npolicy listed the obsolete vending equipment that should no longer receive support from\nmaintenance organizations.\n\nBy continuing to use and maintain obsolete machines, the district will possibly incur\nrepair and maintenance costs that may exceed the revenue generated. We recognize\nmanagement\xe2\x80\x99s desire to provide customer service; however, because the Postal\nService does not capture repair and maintenance, management has no means of\nassessing whether the benefits of operating the obsolete equipment outweigh the costs\nto operate it. District officials indicated that plans will be made to replace the obsolete\nmachines when new automated postal centers are deployed to the district locations.\n\nRecommendation\n\nWe recommend the Manager, Oklahoma District, direct the Retail Manager to:\n\n2. Consider all feasible alternatives, and complete all necessary actions to eliminate\n repair and maintenance cost for the obsolete equipment.\n\nManagement\xe2\x80\x99s Comments\n\nManagement agreed with our finding and recommendation. The District Manager\nstated the district has continued to use obsolete machines in FY 2003 and FY 2004.\nSeventy-five percent of the obsolete machines are located in small post offices.\n\n7\n We plan to address this issue in a capping report to Postal Service Headquarters officials.\n\n\n\n\n 6\n\x0cSelf-Service Vending Program \xe2\x80\x93 DR-AR-05-001\n Oklahoma District\n\n\nPostmasters maintain these machines and do not install new parts. However, the\nDistrict Manager stated that, effective immediately, the retail manager will be directed to\nnotify maintenance that obsolete equipment will not be repaired. Although management\ndoes not agree with the financial feasibility of removing all the equipment at one time\nthe equipment will be removed as it malfunctions and sent to maintenance for proper\ndisposition.\n\nEvaluation of Management\xe2\x80\x99s Comments\n\nManagement\xe2\x80\x99s actions taken or planned are responsive to the recommendation and\nshould resolve the issue identified in this finding.\n\nPhysical Observation of Vending Equipment\n\nOur physical observation of vending machines in the Oklahoma District indicated that\nnot all of the machines were accessible or operable. Specifically, 35 percent (7 of 20) of\nthe machines judgmentally selected for review were not accessible or operating\nproperly in July 2004. Two of the seven machines were not accessible; one machine\nwas being replaced by a new APC in May 2004 and was redeployed to another location,\nand the other machine was not at the location recorded in VESS. District officials\ninformed the OIG that the latter machine was in another location and the postmaster\nresponsible for the machine had not updated the PS Form 8130, Vending Equipment\nSales and Service Daily Activity Log, to ensure the information in VESS was accurate\nregarding the location of the machine. However, the district subsequently provided\ncorrected PS Forms 8130 showing the new locations for these two machines.\n\nThe remaining five of the seven machines were inoperable in July 2004 during our\nphysical observation. Two of the five machines had notices posted as being out of\nservice in July 2004, while the remaining three had no postings. We reviewed\nPS Forms 8130 and found that four of the five inoperable machines showed no\ndowntime for the month of July 2004. District officials stated that the forms did not show\nthe machines\xe2\x80\x99 downtime because inoperable times were less than one day. However,\nofficials added that if a machine is inoperable for any length of time, it must be recorded\non the PS Form 8130. By not properly completing PS Forms 8130, Postal Service\nmanagers have no means of ensuring vending machines are operable or in need of\nrepair, potentially resulting in a loss of revenue.\n\nVESS is a nationwide computerized reporting system for the Self-Service Vending\nProgram, which is used as a management tool for real-time tracking of vending cost\nin relation to sales. Data maintained in the VESS database is generated from\nPS Form 8130, Vending Equipment Sales and Service Daily Activity Log.8 Each\nemployee associated with self-service vending equipment must complete a\nPS Form 8130 detailing the equipment serviced and maintained during each month.\n\n8\n We plan to conduct an audit on the accuracy of data in VESS.\n\n\n\n\n 7\n\x0cSelf-Service Vending Program \xe2\x80\x93 DR-AR-05-001\n Oklahoma District\n\n\n\nRecommendation\n\nWe recommend the Manager, Oklahoma District, direct the Retail Manager to:\n\n3. Require employees to accurately complete PS Form 8130, Vending Equipment\n Sales and Service Daily Activity Log, for the four machines, detailing the inoperable\n status for each machine, and consider retraining employees to accurately complete\n the forms.\n\nManagement\xe2\x80\x99s Comments\n\nManagement agreed with our finding and recommendation. The District Manager\nstated that effective immediately the retail manager will send information to the field\nregarding the proper completion and importance of the PS Form 8130.\n\nEvaluation of Management\xe2\x80\x99s Comments\n\nManagement\xe2\x80\x99s actions taken or planned are responsive to the recommendation and\nshould resolve the issue identified in this finding.\n\nThe OIG considers recommendations 1 and 2 significant, and therefore requires OIG\nconcurrence before closure. Consequently, the OIG requests written confirmation when\ncorrective action(s) are completed. These recommendations should not be closed in\nthe follow-up tracking system until the OIG provides written confirmation that the\nrecommendations can be closed.\n\nWe appreciate the cooperation and courtesies provided by your staff during our review.\nIf you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Debra D.\nPettitt, Director, Delivery and Retail, or me at (703) 248-2300.\n\n\n/s/ Mary W. Demory\n\nMary W. Demory\nDeputy Assistant Inspector General\n for Core Operations\n\nAttachment\n\ncc: John A. Rapp\n Larry Flener\n Lee Hawkins\n Pam Gleason\n Steven R. Phelps\n\n\n\n\n 8\n\x0cSelf-Service Vending Program \xe2\x80\x93 DR-AR-05-001\n Oklahoma District\n\n\n APPENDIX. MANAGEMENT\xe2\x80\x99S COMMENTS\n\n\n\n\n 9\n\x0cSelf-Service Vending Program \xe2\x80\x93 DR-AR-05-001\n Oklahoma District\n\n\n\n\n 10\n\x0cSelf-Service Vending Program \xe2\x80\x93 DR-AR-05-001\n Oklahoma District\n\n\n\n\n 11\n\x0c'


type: wikipedia

text:
Ostrihomské arcibiskupstvo bolo prvé a hlavné arcibiskupstvo v Uhorsku so sídlom v Ostrihome. Prevažná časť jeho územia ležala na území dnešného Slovenska a v časoch svojho najväčšieho územného rozmachu, do roku 1776, zaberala asi 80% jeho rozlohy.
 Pre obdobie po roku 1918 pozri:
 Trnavská apoštolská administratúra – územie, ktoré sa stalo súčasťou Česko-Slovenska, neskôr Slovenska
 Ostrihomsko-budapeštianska arcidiecéza – územie, ktoré zostalo časťou Maďarska
 Dejiny
 Arcidiecézu založil sv. Štefan roku 1000 a podriadil jej všetky ostatné biskupstvá Uhorska.
 Ostrihomská arcidiecéza po pripojení severného Slovenska k Uhorsku zaberala celé Nitrianske kniežatstvo. Okolo roku 1110 bolo obnovené biskupstvo v Nitre, pričom mesto Nitra bolo skoro úplne obklopené Ostrihomským arcibiskupstvom a bola spojená len úzkym pásom so svojím územím, ktoré zaberalo väčšiu časť Trenčianskej stolice. Okrem tohoto územia a územia Šariša, Zemplína a Abova, ktoré patrili do diecézy Eger (Jáger), zaberala celé územie Slovenska.
 Ani po vzniku nového, Kaločského, arcibiskupstva nestratilo svoje prvenstvo. V roku 1279 získavajú ostrihomskí arcibiskupi titul Primas Hungariæ (prímas Uhorska), čiže hlava katolíckej cirkvi v Uhorsku. Od 13. storočia boli ostrihomskí arcibiskupi aj dedičnými županmi Ostrihomskej stolice. Od roku 1715 získavajú titul kniežaťa svätej rímskej ríše, odvtedy používajú titul knieža-prímas (po maďarsky hercegprímas).
 V roku 1543, v dôsledku tureckého nebezpečenstva, sa sídlo arcidiecézy a kapituly prenieslo do Trnavy. V neskoršej dobe arcibiskup, vzhľadom na to, že plnil aj štátne povinnosti, sídlil v hlavnom meste Bratislave. Do Ostrihomu sa sídlo arcibiskupstva a kapituly vrátilo až v roku 1820 na príkaz arcibiskupa Alexandra kardinála Rudnaya.
 V roku 1776 sa územie arcidiecézy zmenšilo, keď na podnet Márie Terézie pápež Pius VI. z nej vyčlenil Banskobystrickú, Spišskú a Rožňavskú diecézu.
 Po prvej svetovej vojne, rozpade Uhorska a vzniku Česko-Slovenska sa väčšina územia arcidiecézy dostala mimo hraníc Maďarska. Tá časť arcidiecézy, ktorá pripadla Česko-Slovensku, bola vyčlenená do samostatnej apoštolskej administratúry, ktorá podobne ako ostatné sufragánne biskupstvá bola podriadená priamo Svätej stolici. Formálne boli cirkevno-právne pomery doriešené až v roku 1977, keď vznikla na území Slovenska Trnavská arcidiecéza.
 Od 31. mája 1993 sa zmenilo meno Ostrihomskej arcidiecézy na Ostrihomsko-budapeštianska arcidiecéza.
 Členenie arcidiecézy
 Pôvodne arcidiecéza pozostávala z týchto archidiakonátov:
 katedrálny
 nitriansky (vrátane pôvodne Turca a Oravy)
 šaštínsky
 tekovský
 hontiansky (vrátane Zvolena a Liptova)
 novohradský
 turniansky
 bratislavské prepošstvo
 spišské prepošstvo
 Začiatkom 17. storočia v dôsledku tureckých výpadov, reformácie a rôznych stavovských povstaní pôsobilo na jej území len asi 100 farárov.
 Koncom 19. storočia sa členila na tri vikariáty – ostrihomský, budapeštiansky a trnavský, 8 archidiakonátov, 46 dekanátov a 478 farností a na jej území pôsobilo približne 780 kňazov.
 Zoznam arcibiskupov
 Ako prvý arcibiskup, sídliaci v Ostrihome (Cathedralis S. Adalberti) sa v dokumentoch spomína Dominik v rokoch 1000 až 1002.
 Zoznam arcibiskupov (resp. administrátorov arcidiecézy) od roku 1526 až do roku 1918
 Externé odkazy
 Zoznam ostrihomských arcibiskupov od 1000 do 1707 (po maďarsky)
 NÉMETHY, L. / Series parochiarum et parochorum archi-dioecesis strigoniensis ab antiquissimis temporibus usque annum MDCCCXCIV - rozsiahly zoznam farárov a farností ostrihom. arcibiskupstva do r. 1894 - dostupné v Digitálnej knižnici UKB
 Uhorsko
 Dejiny Slovenska
 Dejiny Maďarska


type: legislation

text:
COMISIÓN DE LAS COMUNIDADES EUROPEAS
 C0M(90) 129 final
 Bruselas, 11 de abril de 1990
 Propuesta di-
 R E GI... AM£ NT 0 ( C I! E ) D El C0N S E J 0
 r e f e r e n t e a 1 a a p 1 i cae: i ó n d e I a D e c i s i ó n ri e I C o n s e j o d <•.:
 A s o c i a c i ó n C E E - C h i p r e p o r l a que s e ni o d i f i c a, c: o n m o t-i w o d (•:
 1 a a d h e S i ó n (i e E s p a fi a y P o r t u g a 1 a I a s C o m u n i d a d e s E u r o p t a s ,
 e 1 P r o i o c o 1 o r (•:•: 1 a t i u o a I a d e f i n i c. i 6 ¡ i el i. "! •:• n •:• i. ¡ v n d t
 p r o d u c t o s o r i g i n a r i o s y a l o s m é t o d o s de L O u p e r a c i ó n
 admi n i s t r a t i va
 Propues l a de
 R E CLAME NI 0 (CEU) OEI. CONSEJO
 r e f e r e n t e a l a a p l i c a n i dn d e 1 a D. e c i s i o n d e 1 C o n s e j o d e
 A s o c i a c i ó n C E E - M a l t a p o r .la q u e s e m o d i í i c a , c o n m o t i v o d i;
 l a a d h e s i ó n de E s p a rí a y P o r t u g a 1 a 1 a s C o ni u n i d a d e s E u r o p e a s
 e 1 P r o t o c o 1 o r e l a t i v o a l a d e t i n i c i d n d e I ¿¡ n o c: i ó n d e
 p v o ••.! M f; t o s o r i o "' n a r i o s y <•' ' <> • > N¡ ú t o d :.> d Í r O O p r ¡ • ¿i i. i <.; n
 admini s t r a t ¡ v a
 ( p r e s e n t a t a s por La Comisión)
 ---pagebreak--- Pr opost a de
 REGÚLAME NT 0 (C E E ) DO CONS EL IIO
 r t: I a t i v o à a p 1 i c a t;: a" o d a D e c i s a o d o C o n s e l ho d a A s s o c i a ç a o
 C E E C Ivi p r e , q u e a 1 t e r a , n a s e q u ë n t: i a d a a cl e s ci o d e E s p a n h a e d e
 P o r t u g a l a s Co m u n i d a d e s E u r o p e i a s ,
 P r o t o r. o 1 o r e 1 a t i v <> à d e f i n i ç a o d a n o ç a o de p r o d u t o s o r i g i n á r i o s
 e aos métodos de cooperaçao
 a d m i ni s t v a t i v a
 ---pagebreak--- EXPOS ICSQ DE MOT I UPS
 O pr es ( J nte p r ó j ecto de D e c i s a o altera, na se quënci a d a ad es a o d a
 E s p a n h a e de Por t u g al as Co m u n i d a d e s E u r o p e i a s , o Pr o t o c. o 1
 relativo à défi ni çao da no çao de "prod utos or i tri nár i o s " e a os
 m é t o d o • •• de cooper aç^o a d mi n i s t r a t iva, t a n t o d o p o n t o d e v i s t a
 t é c n i c o como do ponto (i e vi s t a d a s d i s p o s i ç o e s n e c e s s á r i a s p a r
 g a r a n '. i r u m a a pi i c: a ç a o corree t a d o r e g i m e c o m e r c i a I p r e v i s t o p
 Protocolo a o acor d o c o n c. luido s pela CE E c o m a C h i p r e .
 ---pagebreak--- Pro post a de
 REGULAMENTO (CEE) PO .CONSELHO
 relativo à a p li cacao da D e c i s 21 o do Conselho de Associaçao
 C E E -Chipre, que altera, na s e q u ë n c. i a d a a d e s a o de E s p a n h a
 e de Portugal as Comunidades E u r o p e i a s , o Protocolo
 relativo à d e f i n i ç a o da n o ç a o de p r o d u t o s originarios e
 aos métodos de coo per açao administrativa
 0 CONSELHO DAS COMUNIDADES EUROPEIAS,
 Tendo em conta o Tratado que institui a Comunidade
 Económica E u r o p e i a e , no m e a d a m e nt e, o s e u artigo 1139,
 Tendo e m conta a p r o p o s t a d a Co m i s s a o,
 Considerando que a D e c i s a o do Conselho, de 21 de Dezembro
 de 198 7, relativa à celebraçao do Protocolo ao Acordó de
 Associaçao entre a C o m u n i cl a d e E c o n ó m i c a E u r o p e i a e a
 República de Chipre na s e q ue n c i a d a a d e s a o do R e i no d e
 Espanha e tía República Portuguesa à Comunidade, fixa o
 regime a p 1 i c á v e1 desde 1 de Janeiro de 1988 as t r o c a s
 comerciáis de E s p a n h a e de Portugal corn M a r r o c o s e Chipre
 n >;
 C o n s i d e r a n d o q u e , em api i c a c a o do a r t i g o 25!2 do P r o t o c o l o
 r e 1 a t i v o à de f i n i ç 3 o da n o ç a o cl e p r o cl u t o s o r i g i n á r i o s e
 a o s m é t o d o s cl e c o o p e r a ç a o a d m i n i s t r a t i v a , o C o n s e l h o d a
 A s s o c i a ç a o CEE C h i p r e a d o p t o u a D e c i s a o n ?
 q ue a l t e r a es s e p r o t o c o 1 o, pa ra t e r e m c o n t a a a d e s a o de
 Ci s p a n ha e de P o r t u g al as Co m u n i d a cl e s E u r o p e i a s ;
 C o i ¡ s i d e r a n d o q u e é ne c e s s a' r i o <¡ p 1 i c a r e s s a d e c: i s a o n a
 Corn uni d a d e,
 { I ) JO n» L 2 8 7 de 2 0 . 1 0 . 1 9 8 8 , p. 1 .
 ---pagebreak--- - ?.. ••••
 ADOPTOU O PRESENTE REGÜLAMENTO:
 Artigo 19
 A D e c i s a o ri 9 d o C o n s e 1 h o de A s s o c i a ç a o C E E •••• C h i p r e
 é a p 1 i c á v e 1 n a C o n) u n i cl a d e .
 0 texto da dec: i s a o ve m a n e x o a o p r e s e n t e r e g u 1 a m e n t o .
 Arti Qo 2 9
 0 p r e s e n t e r e g u I ame n t o e n t r a e m v i g o r n a d a t a cl a s u a
 P u b 1 i c a ç a o no J o r n a l 0 f i c i a 1 d a s C o m u n i cl a ci e s E u r o p e i a s .
 0 p r e s e n t e r e g u 1 a m e n to é api i c á v e I c: o m e f e i t o s cl e s cl e I d e
 .7 a n e i r o de 1 9 8 8 .
 0 p r e s e n t e r1 e y u 1 a m e n to é o b r i g a t ó r i o e m t o d o s o s
 s e u s e l e m e n t o s e d i r e c t a m en t e a p1 i cá v eI e m t o d o s o s
 E s t a d o s - m e m b r o s,
 ie i to em Bruxe 1 as , em
 Pe1 o C o n s e1 ho
 0 Pr e s i de n te
 ---pagebreak--- ANEXO
 P r o j e c t o de d e c i s a o n 9 / 8 9 d o C o n s e 1 h o da A s s o c i a ç a o
 C E E - C h i p r e q ue a l t e r a , na s e q u ë nc i a da a d e s a o d e E s p a n h a
 e de Portugal as C o m u n i d a d e s E u r o p e i as, o P r o t o c o l o
 r e l a t i v o à d e f i ni ç 3 o da n o ç a o de p r o d u t o s o r i g i n á r i o s e
 a o s m é t o d o s de c o o p e r a ç a o a d ni i n i s t r a t i v a
 0 CONSELHO DA A S S O C IAÇA'0,
 T e n do e m c o n t a o Acor d o e n t r e a C o m u n i d a (J e E c o n d m i c a
 E u."' o p e i a e a R e p ú b 1 i c a (Je C h i p r e ( ! ) , a s s i n a cl o e m I 9 de
 D e z e m b r o de 1 9 7 2 ;
 ï eu cl o em c o n t a o P r o t o c o l o a s s i n a d o em 9 de O u t u b r o de
 ! 98 7. na s e q u ë n c i a d a a d e s a o de E s p a nh a e d e P o r t ug a 1 à s
 C o m uni da d e s E u r o p e i a s , e , n o m e a d a m e n t. e , o s e u a r t i g o ?.. 3 9 ;
 c o ns i derando q u e o p r o t o c: o 1 o r e l a t i v o à cl c f i n i ç 3 o da
 n o ç 3 o de p r o d u t o s o r i g i n á r i o s e a o s m é t o cl o s de c o o p e r a ç a o
 a d m i n i s t r a t iva, a s e g u i r cl e n o m i n a d o "P r o t o c o 1 o o r i g e m,!
 ( 7. ) , d e v e s e r al t e r a d o n a s e q u ë n c: i a d a a cl e s a o cl e E s p a n h a
 e d e P o r t u g a l a s C o m u n i d a d e s E u r o pei a s, t a n t o do p o n t o d e
 vista técnico ( : o m o do p o n to d e v i st a d as di spos i ço es
 t r a n s i t: d r i a s n e c e s s á r i a s a u m a h o a a p 1 i c: a ç a o (Jo r e g i m e
 c o m e r c i a 1 p r e v i s t o n o s p r o t o c: o 1 o s r e s u I t a n t e s d a r e f e r i d a
 adesao ;
 C o ns i d erando que as di spos iço es t r a n s i t. d r i a s dev em
 « arantir a c orrec t a ap1 i ca ç a o d e s s as d i s po s i çô es
 c o m e r c i a i s en t r e a C o m u m cl a d e , n a s u a c o m p o s i ç a o e m 31 d e
 1 ) e z e m b r o d e 1 9 8 5 , e a E s p a n h a e P o rt u g a i , p o r um 1 a d o , e
 C h i p r e, p o r o u t r o ,
 DE CI DE :
 ( 1 ) J O n9 L 1 3 3 de 2 1 . 5 . 1 9 7 3 , p. 2 .
 (2) JO n9 L 339 de 28.12.1977, p. 19
 ---pagebreak--- A r t i go 19
 A s d i s p o s i ço e s do P r o t o c o 1 o o ri g e m a s eg ui ri n d i c a d a s s a o
 a 1 1 e r a d a s do s e g u i n t e m o d o :
 !) 0 n 9 2 , s e g u n d o p a r á g r a f o, do art i go I 9 9 pa s s a a t er a
 s e g u i n t e reda cça o :
 11
 0 s c e r t i f i c a cl o s E U R . 1 e m i t i cl o s a p o s t e r i o ri devem
 .' n c. l u i r u m a ûa s s e g u i n t e s m e n ç o e s :
 "DELIVRE A POSTERIORI"
 " U D S T E D T E F T E R F 0 L G E N D E ''
 " N A C H T R A G L IC H A U S G E S T E L L T ' '
 " E K A O O E N EK T Q N Y X T E P Û N "
 " I S S U E D R E T R O S P E C T I U EL V"
 "EXPEDIDO A POSTERIORI"
 "RELASCIATO A POSTERIORI"
 " A F G E G E V E N A POSTERIOR:!:"
 "EMITIDO A POSTERIRI"
 2 ) 0 artigo 209passa a ter a s egui nte reda c çao ;
 ' ' E m c. a s o de fur t o , ex t r a v i o o u dest r ui çao de um
 c e r t i f i c a d o E U R . 1 , o ex p o r t a d o r p o cl e p e cl i r à s a u t o r i ••••
 d a d e s a d u a n e i r a s q u e . o e m i t i r a m u ni a s e g u n d a v i a q u e
 t enha por b ase o s d o c u m e n t o s de ex p o r t a ç a o q u e s e
 e n c o n t r a r a e m p o d e r d e s s as a u t o r i d a d e s . A se g un d a v i a
 em i t i d a n e s s e s t e rm os d e ve i n c 1 u i r um a d a s s e g u i n t e s
 menço es :
 "DUPLICATA"
 "DUPLICAAT"
 "DUPLIKAT"
 "ANTirPAtDO"
 "DUPLICADO"
 "DUPLICATO"
 "DUPLICATE"
 "SEGUNDA VIA"
 J-
 ---pagebreak--- - 5 -
 3) Artikel 29 erhalt folgende Fassung :
 "Artjkel 29
 Waren, die die Voraussetzungen des Ti tels 1 erfüllen und si ch am 1.
 Januar 1988 entweder auf dem Transport oder in der Gemeinschaft, auf den
 Kanarischen Inseln, in Ceuta oder Melilla oder in Zypern in
 vorübergehender Verwahrung, in einem Zollager oder in einer Frei zone
 befinden, konnen die Behandlung nach MaGgabe des Abkommens erhalten,
 sofern den Zollbehorden des Einfuhrstaats innerhalb von sechs Monaten
 nach di esem Zeitpunkt ei ne von den zustandigen Behorden des
 Ausfuhrlandes nachtraglich ertej lte Warenverkehrsbescheinigung EUR. 1
 vorgelegt und der Nachweis für d.i e unmjttelbare Befórderung erbracht
 wird."
 4) Die folgenden Artikel werden in das Ursprungsprotokoll eingefügt :
 "Artikel 31
 Zur Anwendung der im Zusatzprotokoll enthaltenen Besti mm un gen über Waren
 mit Ursprung auf den Kanarischen Inseln, in Ceuta und Melilla gilt
 dieses Protokoll sinngemafl vorbehaltlich der in den Artikeln 32 bis 34
 festgelegten besonderen Voraussetzungen.
 Artikel 32
 Der in diesem Protokoll verwendete Ausdruck, "Gemeinschaft" umfaOt weder
 die Kanarischen Inseln noch Ceuta und Mellila. Der Ausdruck
 "Ursprungserzeugnisse der Gemeinschaft" umfafit nicht die Erzeugnisse mit
 Ursprung auf den Kanarischen Inseln, in Ceuta und Melilla.
 Artikel 33
 1. Anstelle des Artikels 1 gelten die nachstehenden Abs'átze ; die
 Hinweise auf den genannten Artikel gelten sinngemaû für diesen
 Artikel.
 ---pagebreak--- - 6 -
 2) Unter dem Vorbehalt der unrni ttelbaren Bef'órderung gemaR Artikel 5
 gelten als
 a) Ursprungserzeugnisse der Kanarischen Inseln, Ceutas und Mellilas
 i) Erzeugnisse, die vollstandig auf den Kanarischen Inseln,
 in Ceuta und Melilla erzeugt worden sind;
 ii) Erzeugnisse, die auf den Kanarischen Inseln, in Ceuta und
 Melilla unter Verwendung anderer als der unter Ziffer i)
 genannten Erzeugnisse hergestellt worden sind, wenn diese
 Erzeugnisse im Sinne des Artikels 3 Absatz 1 in
 ausreichendem Mafle be- oder verarbeitet worden sind;
 Dieser Voraussetzung bedarf es nicht bei Erzeugnissen, die
 im Sinne dieses Protokolls Ursprungserzeugnisse Zyperns
 oder der Gemeinschaft sind, wenn si e auf den Kanari schen
 Inseln, in Ceuta und Melilla be- oder verarbeitet warden,
 sofern diese Be- oder Verarbeitung über die in Artikel 3
 Absatz 3 ais nicht ausreichend bezeichnete Be- oder
 Verarbeitung hinausgeht.
 b) Ursprungserzeugnisse Zyperns
 i) Erzeugnisse, die vollstandig in Zypern erzeugt worden
 sind;
 ii) Erzeugnisse, die in Zypern unter Verwendung anderer als
 der unter Ziffer i) genannten Erzeugnisse hergestellt
 worden sind, wenn diese Erzeugnisse im Sinne.des Artikels
 3 Absatz 1 in ausrei chendem Mafie be- oder verarbeitet
 worden sind. Dieser Voraussetzung bedarf es nicht bei
 Erzeugnissen, die im Sinne dieses Protokolls
 Ursprungserzeugnisse der Kanarischen Inseln, Ceutas und
 Melilias oder der Gemeinschaft sind, wenn sie in Zypern
 be- oder verarbeitet werden, sofern diese Be- oder
 Verarbei tung über die in Artikel 3 Absatz 3 ais ni cht
 ausreichend bezeichnete Be- oder Verarbeitung hinausgeht.
 A
 ---pagebreak--- - 7
 transformacSés insuficientes referidas no n9 3 do
 art i go 3 8'.
 3. As II has Canarias, Ceuta e Mel il ha sao consideradas como um
 ú n i co territorio.
 4. 0 exportador ou o seu representante autorizado deve apor as
 mençoes "Chi pre" e "11 has Canárias, Ceuta e Melilha" na casa 2
 do certificado EUR. 1 e na casa 1 do formulario EUR. 2. A1 éin
 d i s s o, no caso de p r o d u t o s originarios das 11 h a s Canarias ou e
 Ceuta e Melilha, o carácter originario deve ser indicado na
 casa 4 do certificado EUR.1 e na casa 8 do formulario EUR.2.
 F
 .<. Os produtos enumerados no Anexo II sao temporariamente
 excluidos do ámbito de 'api i caca* o do presente protocolo.
 Todavía, as disposiçSes relativas à cooperaç3o administrativa
 api i earn-se, m u t a t i s m u t a n d i s . a esses produtos.
 "Art i ao 349
 As autoridades aduaneiras espanholas s3o responsáveis pela
 api i cacao do presente protocolo nas II has Canarias e em Ceuta
 e Melilha.
 Art i go 2 9
 A presente dec is3o entra em vigor em 1 de Janeiro de 1989.
 F e i t <> e ni B r u x e 1 a s , e m
 Pelo C o n s e1 h o de A s s o c i a ç a o
 0 Près i dente
 Jy
 ---pagebreak--- Proposta de
 REGULAMENTO (CEE) DO CONSELHQ
 relativo a aplicaçao da Decis3o do Conselho de Associaç3o CEE-
 • Malta, que altera, na sequëncia da ades3o de Espanha e de
 Portugal as Comunidades Europe i as,
 o Protocolo relativo à défi niçao da noçao de produtos originarios
 e aos métodos de cooper aç3o
 'administrativa
 JiA
 ---pagebreak--- E X P Q S K « Q D^-HOTfU.Q-g
 O presente projecto de Decisao altera, na sequéncia da adesao da
 Espanha e de Portugal as Comunidades Eur'opei as, ' o Protocolo
 relativo á def inicio da noc'á'o de " produtos originarios" e aos
 mé tod os de c o op e r a ca o administrativa, tanto do ponto de v i s t a
 técnico como do ponto de vista das dispos ico es necessárias para
 garantir urna aplicacSo correcta do regime comercial previsto pelo
 P i • o t o c o I o a o acordó concluidos pela C E E c o ni Mal t a .
 ---pagebreak--- Pro post a de
 REGULAMENTO (CEE) DO CONSELHO
 relativo 3 aplicaç3o úa Decis3o do Conselho de Associaç.3o
 CE E-Malta, que altera, na seque ne i a da ades3o de Espanha
 e de Portugal 3s Comunidades Europe i as, o Protocolo
 relativo à définiç3o da noç3o de produtos originarios e
 aos métodos de cooperaç3o administrativa
 0 CONSELHO DAS COMUNIDADES EUROPEIAS,
 Tendo em conta o Tratado que institui a Comunidade
 Econdmica Europeia e, nomeadamente, o sëu artigo 1132,
 Tendo em conta a proposta da Comiss3o,
 Considerando que a DecisSo do Conselho, de 27 de
 Fevereiro de 1989, relativa 3 celebraç3o do Protocolo ao
 Acordó de Associaç3o entre a Comunidade Econdmica
 Europeia e a República de Malta nasequêneia da adesSo do
 Reino de Espanha e da República Portuguesa 3 Comunidade,
 fixa o regime aplicável desde I de Janeiro de 1989 3s
 trocas comerciáis de Espanha e de Portugal com Malta (1);
 Considerando que, em aplicaç3o do artigo 259 do Protocolo
 relativo 3 definiç3o da noç.3'o de produtos originarios e
 aos métodos de cooperaç3o administrativa, o Conselho da
 Associaç3o CEE-Mal ta adoptou a Decis3o n9
 que altera esse protocolo, para ter em conta a adesSo de
 Espanha e de Portugal 3s Comunidades Europeias;
 Considerando que é necessário aplicar essa decisao na
 Comunidade,
 (I) JO n9 L SI de 23.03.1989, p 10
 J6
 ---pagebreak--- ADOPTOU O PRESENTE REGULAMENTO:
 Artigo 19
 A DecisSo n9 do Cons el ho de Associaç3o CEE-Mal ta
 é aplicável na Comunidade.
 0 text© da de ci sa© vem anexo ao presente reguI amento.
 Artigo 2 9
 0 presente re gui amento entra em vigor na data da sua
 publicaç3o no Jornal Oficial das Comunidades Europeias.
 0 presente r e g u1 a m e n t © é aplicavel.com e f e i t o s d e s d e 1 de
 Abril de 1989.
 O presente regulamento é obrigatori© em todos ©s
 seus elementos é directamente aplicável em todos os
 Estados-membros. :'
 Feito em Bruxelas,em
 Pelo Conselh©
 O Presidente
 JH
 ---pagebreak--- - 3 -
 ANEXO
 Project.©-'de decis3o n9 /89 do Conselho da Associaçao
 CEE-Malt-a que altera, na sequëncia da adesao de Espanha e
 de Portugal 3s Comunidades Europeias, o Protocol©
 relativo 3 definiçao da noç3o de produtos originarios e
 aos métodos de cooperaçao administrativa
 0 CONSELHO DA ASS0CIAÇ80,
 Tend© em conta o Acordó de Associaçao entre a Comunidade
 Econdmica Europeia e a República de Malta (1), assinado
 em 15 de Dezembro de 1970;
 Tendo em conta o Protocolo assinado em 14 de Dezembro de
 1988, na sequëncia da ades3o de Espanha e de Portugal as
 Comunidades Europeias, e, nomeadamente, © seu artigo 249;
 Considerando que o protocolo relativo à definiçao da
 noç3o de produtos originarios e aos métodos de co©peraç3©
 administrativa, a seguir denominado "Protocolo ©ri gem"
 (2), deve ser alterad© na sequëncia da adesa© de Espanha
 e de Portugal as Comunidades Europeias, tanto do ponto de
 vista técnico como do pont© de vista das dispos ico es
 transitorias necessárias a urna boa aplicaç3© do regime
 comercial previsto nos protocolos resultantes da referida
 ades3o;
 Considerando que as disposiç©es transitorias devem
 garantir a correcta aplicaçSo dessas disp©siç©es
 comerciáis entre a Comunidade, na sua composiç3o em 31 de
 Dezembro de 1985, e a Espanha e Portugal, por um lado, e
 Malta, por outro,
 DECIDE:
 (1) J0 n9 L 61 de 14.3.1971, p. 2.
 (2) J0 n9 L 111 de 28.04.1976, p. 11
 J*
 ---pagebreak--- .¿- Art i go 19
 As disposiçSes do Protocolo origem a seguir indicadas sao
 alteradas do seguinte modo:
 1) 0 nS 2, segund© parágrafo, d© artigo 199 passa a ter a
 seguinte redacçao:
 "Os certificados EUR.1 emitidos a posteriori devem
 incluir u m a das s e g u i n t e s m e n ç o e s :
 "DELIVRE A POSTERIORI"
 "UDSTEDT EFTERF0LGENDE"
 "NACHTRÀGLICH AUSGESTELLT"
 "EKAO0EN EK TON VXTEPÛN"
 "ISSUED RETROSPECTIVELY"
 "EXPEDIDO A POSTERIORI"
 "RELASCIATO A POSTERIORI"
 "AFGEGEvEN A POSTERIORI"
 "EMITIDO A POSTERIRI"
 2) O artig© 209passa a ter a seguinte redacçao:
 "Em caso de furto, extravio ou destruíç2o de um
 certificad© EUR.1, o exportador pode pedir 3s autori-
 dades aduane i ras qué o emitiram urna segunda via que
 tenha p©r base os documentos de exportaçao que se
 encontram em poder dessas autoridades. A segunda via
 emitida nesses termos deve incluir urna das seguintes
 mençôes:
 "DUPLICATA"
 "DUPLICAAT"
 "DUPLIKAT"
 "ANTirPAtDO"
 "DUPLICADO"
 "DUPLICATO"
 "DUPLICATE"
 "SEGUNDA UIA"
 J€>
 ---pagebreak--- 3) O artigo 299 passa a ter a seguinte redacçao:
 "Arti go 299
 As mercadorias que satisfazem as condiçSes d© Título I
 e que, em 1 de Abril de 1989, se encontrara quer em
 transito, quer colocadas, na Cornu nidade, nas II has
 Canarias, Ceuta e Mel il ha ou Malta, sob regime de
 depdsito provisdrio dos entrepostos aduaneiros ou das
 zonas francas, podem ser admitidas a© beneficio das
 disposiç5es do acordó, sob reserva da apresentaçSo, n©
 prazo de seis meses a contar dessa data, as
 autoridades aduane iras do Estado de importaç3o, de um
 certificado EUR.1 emitido "a posteriori" pelas
 autoridades competentes do Estado de exportaç3©, bem
 como dos documentos que comprovam o transporte
 di recto" .
 4) S3o inseridos os seguí'n tes artigos no Protocol©
 or i gem :
 "ftrtÍ9Q 319
 Para api i cacao das disposicSes do Protocolo adicional,
 relativas aos produtos originarios das II has Canarias,
 de Ceuta e M e1 i 1 h a, a p1 i c a-s e, mutatis mutandis, o
 presente protocolo, sob reserva das c o n d i ç © e s espe-
 ciáis definidas nos artigos 329 a 349 segui rites."
 "Artigo 329
 0 termo "Comunida.de" utilizado no presente protocolo
 n3o abrange as II has Canarias, Ceuta e lielil ha. A ex
 press3o "produtos originarios da Comunidade" nao
 abrange os produtos originarios das II has Canarias, de
 Ceuta e Melilha."
 "Artigo 339
 1. Os números seguintes aplicam-se em substituí cao do
 artigo 19, e as referencias a esse artigo a p1 i c a m
 -se, mutatis mutandis, ao presente artigo,"
 ^y
 ---pagebreak--- ... ¿ „
 2 . S o b r e s e r v a de t e r e m si do t r a n s p o r t a d o s d i r e c t a m e n t e, e m
 c o n f o r m i d a d e c o m as d i s p p s i ç ô' e s cl o âr t i g o 5 9, c o n si d e r a m - s e :
 a) P r o d u t o s o r i g i n a r i o s das II h a s C a n a r i a s , de C e u t a e
 Me1 i 1 ha :
 i) O s p r o d u t o s i n t e i r a m e n t e o b t i d o s n a s ï1 h as C a na r i a s ,
 C e u t a e riel i 1 ha ;
 i i) Os produtos o b t i d os ñas 11 h a s Canarias, C e ut a e
 M e l i l h a , em cu jo f a b r i c o e n t r e » p r o d u t o s c o m e x c l u s a o
 d o s r e f e r i d o s na a l i n e a i ) , d e s d e q u e e s s e s p r o d u t o s
 t e n h am s i d o o b j e c t o de o p e r a ç o e s de c o m p l e m e n t o de
 f a b r i c o o u de t r a n s f or m a ç5 es s u f i c i e n t e s , na acepç'lo
 do n9 1 do a r t i g o 3 9. E s t a c o n d i ç a o n a o s e a p l i c a ,
 todavia, aos produtos originarios, na acepç3o do
 p r e s e n t e p r o t o c o l o , da M a l t a ou da C o m u n i d a d e , q u a nd o
 s ejam submetidos, ñas 11 h a s Canarias, em Ceuta e
 Melilha, a o p e r a ç o e s cl e c o m p l e m e n t o de fa b r i c o ou
 t r a n s f o r m a ç o e s q u e ex ce dam as o p e r a ç o e s de c o m p l e m e n t o
 de f a b r i c o ou t r a n s f o rm aç o e s i n s u f i c i e n t e s re f e r i d a s
 no n 9 3 d o a r t i g o 3 9 ;
 b) P r o d u t o s o r i g i n a r i o s da Malta:
 i) Os produt os i n t e i r a m e n t e o bt i d o s na Ma 11 a ;
 i i ) O s p r o d u t o s o b t i d o s na M a l t a e em c: u j o f a b r i c: o e n t r e m
 produtos corn e x c l u s a o (Jos r e f e r i d o s nà al i n e a i ) ,
 desde que esses produtos t enham sido o b j e c to de
 operaçoes de com pi e m e n t o de f a b r i co ou de
 t r a n s f o r m a ç <5 es s u f i c i e n t e s , n a a c e p ç a o do n 9 1 do
 a r t i g o 39. . E s t a c o n d i ç a o n a" o s e a p l i c a , t o d a v i a , a o s
 prod u tos ori gi nár i os , na a c: e p ç a o do pre s ent e
 p r o t o c: o 1 o , d a s 11 h a s C a n a r i a s , d e C e u t a e d e M e 1 i I h a
 ou cl a C o m u n i d a d e , q u a n cl o s e j a m s u b m e t idos a o p e r a ç o e s
 d e c: o m p 1 e m e n t o d e f a b r i c o o u t r a n s f o r m a ç Ô e s n a Ma 1 t a
 q u e e x c e da m a s o p e r a ç o e s d e com p I e m e n t o d e f a b ri c o o u
 ---pagebreak--- -. 7 -
 transformaco es insuficientes referidas no nfi 3 do
 ar ti go 3?.
 3. As II has Canári as, Ceuta e Melilha s3.o consideradas como um
 un i co terri tór i o.
 4. 0 exportador ou o seu representante autorizado deve a por as
 me neo es "Malta" e "II has Canarias, Ceuta e Melilha" na casa 2
 do certificado E U R . 1 e n a casa 1 do formulario E U R . 2 . A I é ni
 disso, no caso de produtos originarios das IIhas Canarias ou e
 Ceuta e Melilha, o carácter originario deve ser indicado na
 casa 4 do certificado EUR.1 e na casa 6 do formulario EUR.2.
 5. Os produtos enumerados no Anexo II sao temporariamente
 excluidos do ámbito de ap 1 i c ac3o do presente protocolo.
 Todavia, as disposigoes relativas a cooperas 3o administrativa
 aplicam-se, m u t a t i s mutandis. a esses produtos.
 "Artigo 359
 As autoridades aduaneiras espanholas sao responsáveis pela
 api ¡cacao do presente protocolo ñas 11 has Canárias e em Ceuta
 e Meli 1 ha.
 Arti go 2 6
 A presente decis3o entra em vigor em 1 de Abril de 1989.
 F e i to em Brux e 1 as, em
 Pelo ConseIho de Associ ac3o
 0 Presidente
 ---pagebreak--- Fiche d'impact PME
 Proposition de 2 règlements du Conseil concernant l'application des Décisions
 des Conseils d'Association CEE-Chypre et CEE-Malte modifiant, en raison de
 l'adhésion de l'Espagne et du Portugal aux Commmunautes européennes, le
 Protocole relatif a la définition de la notion de produits originaires et aux
 méthodes de coopération administrative.
 Ces propositions ne sont pas considérées présenter des effets négatifs pour les
 petites et moyennes entreprises.
 Le Task Force PME a approuvé cette position.
 3o
 ---pagebreak--- ISSN 02S7-9S45
 COM (90) 129 final
 DOCUMENTOS
 ES 11 02
 N° de catálogo : CB-CO-90-145-ES-C
 ISBN 92-77-59194-3
 Oficina de Publicaciones Oficiales de las Comunidades Europeas
 JL-2985 Luxemburgo
 ---documentbreak--- COMISIÓN DE LAS COMUNIDADES EUROPEAS
 Le présent document annule et remplace C0M(90) 129 f i n a l / 2
 le document COM(90) 129 f i n a l
 du 11.4.1990 Bruselas, 16 de mayo de 1990
 (ne concerne que les versions espagnole
 et portugaise)
 Propuesta de
 REGLAMENTO (CEE) DEL CONSEJO
 « ' e f e r e n t e a l a a p l i c a c i ó n de la D e c i s i ó n d e l C o n s e j o de
 ( -.:; o c: i a c i ó n C E E C h i p r e por l a q u e s e m o d i f i c a , c o n m o t i v o d i-
 I ,.\ a d h e s i ó n el y t S p a fí a y P o r t u g a l a l a s C o m u n i d. i d e s E 11 r o p e u s,
 el P r o t o c o l o r e l a t i v o a l a d e i i n i c I ó n d t- I a n o c i o n ti e
 p r o d u c t o s o r i g i n a r i o s y a l o s métodos de i . o u p e r a c i ó n
 a d m i ni s t r a t i v<:;
 Propuesta de
 REGLAMENTO (CEE) DEL CONSEJO
 r e f e r e n t e a la a p l i c a c i ó n de la D e c i s i ó n del C o n s e j o de
 A s o c i a c i ó n C E E M a l t a p o r la q u e s e m o d i f i c a , c o n m o t i v o de
 a a d h e s i ó n de F s p a ñ a y P o r t u g a l a las Co n» 11 n i d a d e s E u r o p e a s
 el P r o t o c o l o r e l a t i v o a la d e f i n i c i ó n de la n o c i ó n de
 p r o d u c t o s o r i g i n a r i o s y a l o s m é t o d o s de: c o o p e r a c i ó n
 a d mi n i s t r a t. i v a
 (presentadas por la Comisión)
 ---pagebreak--- ---pagebreak--- P rop uesta d e
 R E G L A M E N T O ( C E E ) DEL. C O N S E J O
 r e f e r e n t. e a 1 a a p 1 i r a c i ó n d e 1 a D e c i s i ó n del C o n s e j o d e
 A s o c: i a c i o n C E E C h i p r e p o r 1 a q u e s e m o cl i f i c a , c o n m o t i v o d e
 1 a a d h e s i ó n d c: E s p a ñ a y P o r t u gai a I a s C o m u n i d a d e s E u r o p e a s ,
 e 1 P r o t o t: o 1 o r e 1 a t i v o a I a d e f i n i c: i ó n d e la n o c i ó n de
 p Í • o d u c t o s o r i g i n a r i o s y a I o s m é t o cl o s de u o o p e r a c i ó n
 adm i n i strat i va
 ^
 ---pagebreak--- EXPOSIC ! 0,1 !H- ílOTlUOS
 i í p ?•• e ••::, e. n 1; e p r o y e e: t o d e el & e: i s ; o ¡ i m o d "i f i e: a , ci e s p u é s (i e i a
 a ¡1 h es ; ors d e I"sp a ñ a y P o r 1: ti Q a i a 1 as Com ti n i el a el es íi t i r o p e a s ,
 P n o i o c; n 1 o r e í a t i u o a 'la el e f ; n i e. i ó n de 1 a n o e: i d n e! e
 " ' p r o d u e. t o s o r ¡ cj i n a r i o <¡> " y l o ••., ni é t o eí o s d e e: o o p (•:•: r a e: i d n
 a d¡a i n i •: t •,• í:t \ -j ^ cj i ¿i n t <> d es <i e e 1 p ¡¡ n t <> d e I» i s t a t c' e. ¡i 'i i: o e: omo
 d e s d e e I p ti n t o d e o i s t a el e '! a s el i s p o s i e: i o n e s n e e: e s a r "i a s p a
 as e g t i r a r ti n a e : o r r e c:t a ap 1 i e: a e i o n de '! r é y i w e n e;oIVIer c i a 1
 p v e v i s t o p o r e l P r o t o c o l o al , i r u érelo c o n c l u i d o p o r l a C U :
 c o n C li ¡ p r e ,
 ---pagebreak--- P r o p t i e s 1:a de
 REGLAMENTO (CEE) DEL CONSEJO
 r e f e r e n t e a la a p 1 i c a c i d n cl c I a D e c i s i ó n del C o n s e j o de
 A s o c i a c i ó n CE E - Chi p r e p o r 1 a q ti e s e m o d i f i c a , c o n m o t i v o d e
 la a d h e s i o n de E s p a ñ a y d e P o r t. u g a I a 1 a s C o m u n i d a d e s
 E u r o p e a s , e1 P r o t o c o 1 o r e I a ti v o a I a d e f i ni c i o n d e 1 a n o c i d n
 d e p r o d u c t o s o r i g i n a r i o s y a I o s m é t o cl o s d e c o o p e r a c i ó n
 a cl m i n i s t r a t i v a
 EL C O N S E J O DE L A S C O M U N I D A D E S EUROPEAS,
 U i s t o cl T r a t a do c o n s t i t. u t i v o d e 1 a C o m u ni d a cl E c: o n ó m i c a
 E u r o p e a y , e n p a r t i c: u 1 a r , s u a r t i c u I o 1 1 3 ,
 V i s t a 1 a p i1 o p u e s t a de I a Com i s i dn ,
 C o n s i d e r a n d o q u e ! a D e c i s i o n d e I C o ns e j o , de 21 d e d i c i em b r e
 d e I 9 E: 7 , T1 e I a t i v a a I a c: e I e b r a c i ó n d e 1 P r o t o c o 1 o d e 1 A c u e r d o
 d e A s o c: i a c i d n e n t r e 1 a C o m u n i d a d E c o n ó m i c a E ti r o p e a y I a
 R e p ú b 1 i c a d e C h i p r c:, c o m o c o n s e c u e n c i a d e I a A d h e s i d n d e 1
 R e i n o d e E s p a il a y d e I a R e p u b I i c: a P o r t u g u e s a a I a C o m u n i d a d ,
 s e e s t. <:i b 1 e c: e e 1 r é g i m e n a p i i c: a b I e a p a r t i r d e 1 I d e a b r i 1 d e
 ! 9 3 9 a 1 o s i n t e r c a m b i o s d e E :> p a fi a y cl e P o r t u g a 1 c o n Ma I t a
 CI);
 C o n s i cl e r a n d o q u e e 1 C o n s e j o d e A s o c: i a c i d n C E E C h i p r e h a
 a d o p t a d o , e n a p 1 i c: a c i d n (j e I a r t í c: u 1 o 2 5 cl e I P r o t o c o l o
 r e I a t i v o a 1 a d e f i n i c: i d n d e I a n o c i d n d e p r o d u c: t o s
 0 r i g i n a r • i o s y a 1 o s m é. t o cl o s d e c o o p e r a c i d n a d m i n i s t r a t i v a ,
 1 a D e c: i s i d n n P p o r 1 a q u e s e m o cl i f i c: a d i c: h o P r o t o c: o 1 o , a
 f i n d e t e n e r t: n c; u e n ta la a d h v; s i d n d e E s p a ñ a y d e P o r t u g a l a
 1 a s C o muni d a d e s Euro p e a s ;
 C o n s i d e r a n d o q u c: e s p r o c: e cl e n t. e g a r a n t i 7 a r 1 a a p 1 i c: a c. i ó n cl t:
 d i t h a De c i s i o' n e n l a Co m u n i cl a cl,
 El A AD 0 P T A D 0 lu L P R E S E N T E R t GI... A M E N f C) :
 A r t i ( ci 1 o 1
 5 e r a a p i i c a b I e e n I a C o .n u n i cl a cl 1 a D e c i s i d n n9 cl e 1
 C o n s c j o d e A s o c; i a ¡.: i d n C E E ••• C h i p r e .
 E 1 t. e x t o cl e I a D e c: i s i d n f'- i g u r a a d j u n t o a 1 p r' c» s e n t e
 Re g I ame n t c .
 (!) DO n 9 E. 3 9 3 d e 3\ , 1 2 . 1 7 S ? , p. 36
 ---pagebreak--- A ( ' ! i i ti 1 o 2
 E 1 p r e s e n t e R e g l a m e n t o e n t r a T • á e n v i g o r e I d í a de s ti
 p ti b 1 i c: a c: i d n en e l D i a r i o 0 í i c: i a I d e I a s C o m u n i cl a d e s
 E ti r o p e a s .
 Será a p 1 i c: a b I e a par t i r del I d e e n i? r ' o cl e 1 9 8 8 .
 E 1 p r e s e n t e R e g 1 ame n t o s e r á o b I i g a t o r i o e n t o cl o s s u s
 e 1 e m e n t o s y cl i r e c: t a m e n t e a p ! i r a b I e e n c a cl a E s t a d o m i e m b r o
 El e c: h o e n Br us eI as , eI
 Por e I C o n s e ;j o
 EI P r e ::> i d e n t e
 r
 ---pagebreak--- Anexo
 P r o y e c t o de d e c i s i ó n n 9. / 8 9 d e 1 C o n s e j o cl e A s o c i a c ï d n
 C E E - C h i p r e p o r la q u e s e m o d i E i c a , c: o n m o t i v o cl e 1 a a d h e s i d n
 d e E s p aña y d e P o r t u g a I a I a s C o m u n i d a d e s E ti r o p e a s , el
 P i •• o t. o c o 1 o r e I a t i v o a 1 a d e f i n i c. i d n cl e 1 a n o c i d n d e p r o d u c t o s
 o r i g i n a r i o s y a 1 o s m é t o cl o s cl e e o o p e r a c: i d n a d m i n i s t r a t i v a
 LA C O M 1ST ON MIXTA,
 U i s t o e l A c: u e r d o d e A s o c: i a c: i o n e n t r e I a C o m u n i d a cl E c o n d m i c a
 E u T1 o p e a y I a R e pu b 1 i c a d e C h i p r e ( 2 ) , í i r m a cl o e 1 1 9 d e
 d i c i e m b r e d e 19 7 2 ,
 U i s t o e I P r o t. o c: o 1 o f ï r m a cl o e I 9 d e. o c t u b r e cl e 1 9 8 7 c: o m o
 c: o n s e c: ti e n c: i a d e I a a cl h e s i d n d e E s p a ñ a y cl e P o r t u g a 1 a 1 a s
 C o m u n i cî a d e S E ci r o p e a s y , e n p a r t i c: u 1 a r , s u a ï 1 1 í c: u I o 2 3 ,
 C o n s ï d e r a n d o q u e , c o m o ;:: o n s e c i e a c: i a (Je l a ad h e s i d n d e E s p a ñ a
 y cl e P o r t u g a 1 a 1 a s C o m ci n i d a d e s E u r o p e a s , cl e b e m o d i f i c: a r s e
 e 1 P r' o t o c: o 1 o r e 1 a t ï v o a I a d e E i n i c: i d n cl e p r o d u c: t o s
 o r i g ¡ n a r ¡ o s y a 1 o s m é t o (i o s d e c: o o p e r a c: i o n a d ni i n i s t: r a t i u a ,
 en adelante denominado "Protocolo or i g inari o " ( 3 ) , tanto
 d e s d e e 1 p a n t o de v i s t a t é c: n i r o c o m o (Je s cl e e I p u n t o de v i s t a
 cl e I a s cl i s p o s i c. i o n c: s t r 111 s i t • • ; • i a s n e ¿: e s a r i a s p a r a un a
 c: o r r e c: ' a a p 1 i c: a c i d n cl e 1 r é g i men t.: o m e r c: i a 1 p r e v i s t o e n I o s
 P r o t o c o 1 o s r e s ci 1 t a n t e s d e cl i c: ! i a a d h e s i o 11 ;
 C o n s i ri e r a n cl o g ci e l a s cl i s p o -, i ( i o n e s t r a n s i t o r i a s d e b e n
 g a r a n f i z a Ï-' ! a a p 1 i c a c i d n c: o r v e c t a cl e c! i c h a s d i s p o s i c i o n e s
 c: o m e r' c: i a I e s e n t r e 1 a C o ni u n i d a d e n s u t: o m p o s i c: i ó n a I 31 de
 d i c: i e m b r e c! e I 9 8 5 y E s p a ñ a y p o r t ti g a 1 , p o r u n a p a Ï • t e , y ! a
 R e p ú b I i c: a (J e C h i p r1 e , p o r o t r a ;
 DECI DE :
 A r t í c: ti ¡ o pr i m er o
 I. a -:•• d i s p o s i c: i o n e s d e 1 P r o t o c o I o o r i g i n a r i o q u e s e i n cl i c a n a
 c o n 11 n u a c: i d n q u e d a n m o cl i í i c: a cl a s d e 1 s i g u ¡ e n t e m o d o ;
 i ) S e s u s t i t a y e e 1 s e o u n (J o p á r r a f o d e 1 a r t i c u 1 o 19 p o r e 1
 s i gui ente tex E > :
 " !.. o s c: c r t i f i c a d o s E U R . I e x p e cl i d o s a p o s t e r i o r i d e b e r á n
 i r p r o v I s t a s d e u n a (Je la s i n cl i c: a c: i o n e s <•:> i gui e n t e s :
 ( 2 ) DO n9 I... 13 3 d e 2 1 . 5 . 1 9 7 3 , p . 2
 ( 3 ) DO n 9 L 3 3 9 d e ?.. 8 . 1 2 . 1 9 7 7 , p . 19
 ---pagebreak--- 4
 "DELIVRE A POSTERIORI"
 "UDSTEDT EFTERFOLGENDE"
 " N A C H T R A G L I C H A U S G E 5 T E !... !.. T "
 " E K A 0 9 E N EK T O N Y I T E P Ü N "
 " I S S U E D RE TR O S P E C T I U E L Y "
 "EXPEDIDO A POSTERIORI"
 1
 ' R 11... A S C I A T O A P O S T E R I O R I "
 "AFGEGEVEN A POSTERIORI"
 "EMITIDO A POSTERIOR"
 ?.. !" S e s u s t i t u y e e I t e x t o «..I e I a r t i c: u I o ?.. O d e 1 s i g u i e n t. G m o d o :
 " E n c a s o d e r- o b o , p é Ï' d i cl a o d e s t n ci c c: i ci n cl e u n c: e r t i í i c a cl o
 EUR. I , e I e x : ) o n t a d o r p o d r a n e c: I a m a n a I a s a u t o r- i cl a cl e s
 a d u a n e r as q u e I o h a y a n e y p e d i d o u n cl u p 1 i c: a cl o s o b r e 1 a
 b a s e cl e 1 o s d c c: u m e n t o s d e e x p o n t a c: i o n q u e o b n e n e n s u
 P o d e r . E 1 cl u p I i c: a d o a s i e x p e cl i cl o d e. b e n ¿i 1 1 e o a n u n a de l a s
 i n d i c a c i o n e <> :
 s i q u i ent es :
 "DUPLICATA"
 " D U PI. I C A AT "
 " D U PI... I K A T "
 "ANTirPAfPO"
 "DUPLICADO"
 "DUPLICATO"
 "DUPLICATE"
 " S E G U N D A U.I A "
 3 ) E 1 a n t i c u I o ? 9 s e s u s t i t u i r • a p o Ï'1 e 1 t e x t o s i Î;J U i e nte :
 " A r t í c u Io 2 9
 L a s m e n c. a n c: Í a s q u c: r e ci n an 1 v.» v. n e q u i s i t. o s d e 1 T i t u 1 o I q u e
 en e "I 1 de e rie no de \9^8 ••••>: e n c u e n t r e n en t r á r i b i t o , o
 c: o I o i. a cl a :;; e n 1 a C o m u i ; i d ad., i • n 1 a s I s 1 a s C a n a c I a s , C e u t a y
 ft e I i 1 I d o c. n C h i p n e a ! ^ w ; a i ' o d e ! c ó q i ¡n e n d e d e p d s "i t o
 P n o y i s i o n a ' , d e cl e p o s i !•<.••. a d u a n e n o s o d e z o n a s f ¡ ' a n c a s ,
 P o cl Ï' á n b C' n e t i c i an s e cl e i a s < I ; s p o s i c: i o n e s cl e 1 A c u e v cl o , a
 c e s e n u a de 1 <¡ p r e ' - , e n t a i M ' H . en un p ' a z o de s e i s m e s e s a
 p a n t. i n d e d i c h a f e c: h a , a n i e ! a •'•'. a u t o n i d a cl e s a cl u a n e r a s cl e 1
 F s l: a d o d e ¡ m p o n t o c i d n , < ' e u i •• r e T • t i f' ! '..ado l U R . I ex t e n cl i cl - .•
 a p o s t en i on i por* ' l a s a u t ^ r » l a c l e s c o m p e t e n t e s d e l Estado
 cl c '"•: y p o n t a c i d n , a s Í c o ni o d e 1 <> : s t.! o c u m e n i : o s .j us t: Ï f i c a t i v w s
 cl e 1 !" n a us po r t. c: d i p e c t o " .
 i ) Se i n(-- e n ! a n .i n i os a n l i c: u I <•• •,, s ¡qui ent es:
 ---pagebreak--- " A r t í cul o 31
 A l o s e f e c t o s d e I a a p 1 i c a c: i o n (i e I as d i s p o s i c i o n e s de 1
 P r o t o c o 1 o a d i c i o n a l r e í a t i v a s a l o s p r o d u c t o s o r i g i na r i o s
 de l a s I s 1 a s C a n a r i a s , d e C e u t a y cl e M e 1 i l i a , s e a p I i c a r á
 m u t a t i s m u t a n d i s e 1 p r e s e n t e P r1 o t o c o I o , s i n p e r j u i c i o de
 1 a s c o n d i c i o n e s p a r t i c: u 1 a r e s d e f i n i d a s e n I o s a r t i c u I o s
 3 2 a 3 4 s i g ci i e n t e s " .
 "Articulo 32
 L a e x p r e s i o n " C o m u n i d a d " ti t i 1 i z a d a e n e I p r e s e n t e
 p r o t o c: o 1 o n o s e r e f i e r e a I a s I s I a s C a n a r i a s , C e u t a o
 M e 1 i I 1 a . I... a e x p r e s i d n " p r o cl ci c t o s o r i g i n a r i o s de l a
 C o m u n i d a d " n o s e r e f i e r e a 1 o s p r1 o d u c t o s o r i g i n a r i o s d e
 l a s I s l a s C a n a r i a s , d e C e ci t a y de M e 1 i l l a " .
 " A r t í c: u I o 3 3
 1 , E n s u s t i 1. ci c: i d n d e 1 a r t í c: ci 1 o I s e r á n a p 1 i c: a b I e s l o s
 a p a r t a cl o s s i g u i e n t e s , y l a s r e f• e r e n t: i a s a d i c: h o
 a r 11 c: u I o s e a p I i c: a Ï1 á n ' ' m M t a t i s m u t a n d i s " a l p r e s e n t e
 ar t i cu1 o .
 2. S i n p e r ;i ci i c: i o (i e q u e 11 a y a n s i cl o t r a n s p o r t a d o s
 d i r e c: t a m c: 111 e cl e c o n f o r m i d a d c: o n I o d i s p u e s t o en e1
 a r t i c: u 1 o 5 , s e c o 11 s i d e r a r á n c: o m o ;
 a) p r o d u c t o s o r i g i n a r i o '•:> cl e I as I s 1as Canarias, Ceuta
 y Me1i I I a;
 i ) Ios p i • o cl u c: t o s c; ! 11 e r a m e 111 e o b t e n i (J o s en Malta;
 i i ) I o s p r c) d u c: t o s o b t e • 11 cl o s e n I a s I s I a s C a n a r i a s ,
 C e ci t a y M e I i ! I a y e n c u y a t a b r i c: a c: i d n s e h a y a n
 u t i M z a cl o p r o d u c: t o s cl i s t i n t o s d e I o s
 c: o n t e m p 1 a cl o s e n e I i n c: i s o i ) , s i e m p r e q ci e t a i e s
 P r o cl ci c: t o s h a y a n s i d o o b ;j e t o cl e e I a b o Ï* a c: i o n e s o
 t r a n s f o r m a t : i o n e s s ci f i c i e n t e s c o n a r r e g 1 o a 1
 a p a r t a cl o 1 cl e I a r t í c. a I o 3 . S i 11 e m b a r g o , e s t a
 c: o n d i i : i d n n o s e r á a p I i c: a b l e a I o s p r o d u c t o s
 o r i g i n a r i o s , c: o n a r r e g I o a 1 p r e s e n t e P r o t o c o I o ,
 d e C h ' p r e o d e I a C o m ci n i d a d , c: ci a n cl o s e l e s
 s o m e t a , e 11 I a <• I s I a s C a n a r i a s , C e ci t a y M e I i l i a ,
 a (•: 1 3 l:i o r a c: i o n e s o t r a n s T o r m a c i o n e s q u e s u p e r e n
 l a s c-1 a b o r- a c i o n e s o t r a n s f o r m a c i o n e s
 i n s a f' i c: i e n t e s c: o n t. e m p I a d a ci e n e 1 a p a r t a d o 3 (J e I
 a r t i c ci I o 3 ,
 ?
 ---pagebreak--- b) p r o d t i c: t o s o r i g i nar i os cl e C h i p r e ;
 i ) Ios p r o d ci c t o s ent er ame nt e obt en i dos en Chi pr e;
 il) I o s p r o cl ci c t o s o b I e n i d o s e n C h i p r e y e n c u y a
 f a b r i c: a c: i ó n s e 11 a y a n u t i 1 i z a d o p r o cl u c: t o s
 c! i s t i n t o s cl e l o s c: o n t e m p I a d o s e n e i i n c i s o i ) ,
 s i e m p r e q u e t a 1 e s p r o cl a c: t o s h a y a n s i cl o o b j e t o cl e
 t r a n s f o r m a c: i o n e s s u E i c: i e n r e s c: o n a r r e g l o a I
 a p a r t a d o I c! e I a r t Í ;: ci I o 3 . S i n e m b a r g o , es t a
 c: o n cl i c i d n n o s c r a a p 1 i c: a I.) 1 e a 1 o s p r o d u t: t o s q u e
 s t/ a n o r i g i n a r i o • , t o n a r r e g 1 o a 1 p r e s e n t e
 P r • o t o c: o l o , de ! . . a i s I a s C a n a r i a s , cl e Ce u t a y (Je
 Me'! i l l a o de l a Coi m m i cl a cl . c u a n d o s e a n o b j e t o de
 •? I i b o r a c: i o n e s o ' r • a n s f o r m a c: i o n e s e n C11 i p r e q u e
 s t; p C' r en ! a s e ! a E o r a c. i o n e s o t r a n s f o r m a c: i o n e s
 i n s ci f i c: i e n t e s c: o n '. > : m p 1 a d a s e n e 1 a p a r t a d o 3 ci e ¡
 a r l i t.. i f 1 o 3
 I... a s I s '! a s C a n a r i a s , C c- ci t a y M e I i l I a se c: o n s i cl e r a r a n
 r o m o u n ú r» i c o 1: e r r i t o n o .
 E I e a p o r t a cl o y o c; u r e p r e s e n t a n t e lia b i 1 i t a d o e s t a r á
 0 b l i g a d o a i n d i c: a r I a s r e t e r e n c: i a s " C h i p r e " e " I s 1 a s
 C a n a r i a s , C e ci t a y M e I i I I a " e n 1 a c: a s i l i a 2 d e 1
 c: e r t i f i c: a d o E U R . I y e a la c: a s i I 1 a I cl e 1 f o r m u 1 a r i o
 E U R . 2 . A d e m á s , en e ! c: a s o cl e p r o d a c: t o s o r i g i n a r i o s d e
 1 a s I s I a s C a n a r i a s o cl e C e u t a y M e. I ï 1 1 a , s e cl e b e T-' á
 ; n cl i c: a r e 1 c a r á c: t c; r o r i g i n a r i o e n 1 a c: a s i l i a 4 cl e I
 certi'l i c a d o E U R . I y i. n la c a s i l i a 8 del f o r m u l a r i o
 EUR . ?.
 I... o s p r o cl u c: t o s e n i1 m e r a ci •..• -• > en e 1 A n e x o 11 q u e cl a r á n
 e x c I n i cl o s •(" e m p o r a I ¡n e n t e d e I a m b ' t o cl e a p 1 i c a c: i d n cl e I
 f) r e s e n t e P r o t o c: o lo N o <„-1 s s t a n t e , s e r á n cl e api i c: a c i d n a
 d i c h o s p r o d u e t o s , m ci t a 11'" m ut am d i s , l a s d i s p o s i c i o n e s
 e n m a t e r i a d e c: o o p e r a t ¡ o n a d ni i n i s t r a t i v a " .
 " A r t i cu I o 3 4
 C o <•• r e s p o n c! e r1 á a 1 a s a c¡ i o r i cl a d e s a c! u a n e r as e s p a ñ o 1 a s
 g a r a n t i z a Ï1 I a a p 1 i c a c i ó n r i e l P r o t o c o I o en l a s I s I a s
 C a n a r i a s y e n C e n t a y sV: • • I i 1 I a " .
 J>
 ---pagebreak--- ... 7...
 A r t i c: u 1 o 2
 L a p r esente De c i s i d n e n t. r ar á en v i g o r e 1 1 de enero de 1 988.
 Il e c: h o e n , el
 P o i • e 1 C o n s e .j o de A s o c: i a c i d n
 E I P n e s i cl e n t e
 ---pagebreak--- P r o p ti e s t a d e
 R E G I. A M E N T O ( C E E ) D E I.. C O N S E J O
 referente a la a p I i c: a c: i o' n cl e I a D e c: i s i d n d el C o n s e j o cl e
 A s o c: i a c: i d n C E E •••• M a 1 t a p o r 1 a q ci e s e m o cl i f 'i c: a , c: o n m o t i v o d e
 a a d h e s i d n cl e E s p a ñ a y P o r t ci g a I a 1 a s C o m ci n i d a d e s E u r o p e a s
 e 1 P r o t o c: o I o r e 1 a t i v o a 1 a cl e í i n i c: i d n d e 1 a n y c i ó n cl e
 p r o d u c: t o s o a i g i na r i o s y a 1 o s m é t o d o s d e c: o o p e r a c i ó n
 a cl m i n i s t r a t i v a
 -M
 ---pagebreak--- EXPOSICIÓN DE MOTIVOS
 El p r e s e n t e p r o y e c t o de de c: i s i o n ni e d i f i c a , d e s p u é s de 1 a
 a el h e s i d n de E s p a ñ a y P o r t u g a l a las C o m u n i d a d e s E u r o p e a s , el
 P r o t o c o l o r e l a t i v o a la el e í i n i c ion de la n o c i d n d e
 " p r o d u c t o s o r i g i n a r i o s " y I o s ID é t o d o s de c o o p e r a c i ó n
 adm i n i str a t i va t a n t o des de e I p ti nto de v i st a t éc n i co c o m o
 d e s d e el p u n t o de v i s t a de I as el i s p o s i c i o n e s n e c e s a r i a s p a r a
 ase gur ar un a c o r r e c t a apI i c ac i d n del r ég i me n c o m e r c i al
 p r e v i s t o por el P r o t o c o l o a 1 a e: u e r do c o n c 1 u i d o p or la C E E
 e: o n M a l t a ,
 ---pagebreak--- P r o p ci e s t a d e
 REGLAMENTO ( C E E ) DEL CONSEJO
 r e f e r e n t e a 1 a a p i i c: a c: i d n cl e 1 a D e c i s i d n d e I C o n s e j o d e
 A s o c i a c: i d n C E E •••• M a 1 t a p o r 1 a q u e s e m o cl i f i c: a , c: o n m o t i v o d e
 I a a d h e s i p n (J e E s p a ñ a y d e P o r 1ci g a 1 a I a s C o m u n i d a d e s
 E Li r o p e a s , e I P r o t o c o 1 o r e 1 a t i v o a 1 a cl e f i n i c: i d n d e 1 a n o c i d n
 c! e p r o cl ci c: t o s o r i g i n a i • i o s y a 1 o s m é t o (J o s d e c: o o p e r a c i d n
 adm i n i st r at i va
 EL CONSEJO DE L A S C O M U N I D A D E S EUROPEAS,
 U i s t o e '! T r a t a cl o c: o n s t i t u t i v o ci e la C o m u n i cl a cl E c: o n d m i c: a
 E 11 r o p e a y > e n p a r t i c u I a r , s u a r i: i c u 1 o 1 1 3 ,
 U i sta I a p r o p ci e s t a cl e I a Com i si dn ,
 C o n s i d e r a n d o q u e l a D e c i s i o n d e l C o n s e j o , de 2 7 de f e b r e r o
 d e I 9 8 9 , r e l a t i v a a l a c e I e b r a c: i o' n d c 1 P r o t o c: o I o d e 1 A c ci e r cl o
 •J e A s o c i a c i d n e n t 1 • e l a C o m u n i cl a cl E c: o n d m i c a E ti r o p e a y l a
 R c: p ci b I i r a d e Mal t a , c: o m o c: o n s e c: u e n c i a d e 1 a A d h e s i d n (J e 1
 R e i n o d e E s pa ñ a y de I a R e p ú b ! i c a P o r t u g ue s a a la C om uni d a d ,
 se e s t a b 1 e c: e e I r é g i ni e n a p ! i c: a b 1 e a p a r t i r d e I 1 de a b r i 1 cl e
 I 9 8 9 a 1 o s i n t e r'1 c. a m b i o s cl e E s p a n a y cl e P o r t u g a 1 c. o n M a l t a
 H ) ;
 C o n s i d e r a n d o q u e e I Con s e > o cl e A s o c: i a c: i d n C E E M a l t a h a
 a d o p t a c! o , e n a p I i c a c i d n d e I a r t i c: u I o ?.. '< cl e 1 P i • o t o c o I o
 r e í a t i v o a l a d e f i n i s i d n d e I a n o c: i d n cl e p r o cl u c: t o s
 o r i g i n a r i o s y a l o s m é t o d o s de c o o p e r a c i ó n administrativa,
 I a [) e c: i s i d n n 9. p o r I a q ti e s e m o cl i f i c: a c! i c: h o P r o t o c: o 1 o , a
 f i n de t e n e r e n c: u e n t a I a a d b e s i 6 n cl e E s p a ñ a y d e P o r t ci g a l a
 1 a s C o m u n i c! a d e s E 11 r o p e a s ;
 C o n s i c! e r a n c! o q u e es p r o c t; d e n t e g a r a n t i 7 a r la a p 1 i c: a c: i ó n de
 d i cba D e c: i :•> i o n en 1 a C o m u n i c! a d ,
 11A ADO P T A D 0 E I. PR E S E NT I R E G E AMEN T 0 :
 A e t i t ci 1 o 1
 S e r á a p I i c: a b I e e n i a C o m u n i cl a cl ! a D e c i s i d n n° cl e 1
 C o n s " j o de A s o c: i a c i d n C E E ••• M a I t a .
 E 1 t e x t o d e I a D e c. i s i d n f i g u »' a a cl :i ci n t o a1 pr es ent e
 Reg I am ent o.
 ( I ) DO nP !.. 8 1 de 23 . 0 3 . I 98 9 , p. 1
 J^
 ---pagebreak--- 2. •••
 A r t i c: u I o 2
 E1 p r e s e n t e R e g 1 a n i e n t o e n t r a r a en v i g o r e l d í a de su
 P u b 1 i c a c i d n e n e l Di a r i o 0 f i c i a I el e I a s C o ni u n i d a d e s
 Europeas.
 5 e r á a p 1 i c: a b '! e a p ar t i r ti e 1 I ele a b r i 1 de 1989 .
 E I p r e s e n t e R e g 1 a ni e n t o se r á o b 1 i g a t o r i o e n t o d o s s u s
 e I e ni e n t o s y d i r e c t a m e n t e a p I i c a b l e en cada E s t a d o m i e ni b r o .
 Hecho en BrtiseI as, e1
 P o r el C o n s e j o
 E1 P r • e s i den t e
 ---pagebreak--- Anexo
 P r o y e c t o cl e d e c: i s i ó n n 9. / 8 9 d i: 1 C o n s e j o (Je A s o c: i a c i d n
 C E E •••• M a 1 t a p o r 1 a q u e s e ni o cl i f i c: a , c: o n m o t ï v o d e 1 a a d h e s i d n
 de E s pañ a y d e P o r t u g a I a 1 a s C o m u n i d a cl e s E u r o p e a s , e 1
 P r • o t o c. o 1 o r e 1 a t i v o a 1 a cl e f i n i c i d n cl e I a n o c: i d n cl e p r o d u c t o s
 or i g i nar ios y a 1 o s m é t o d o s cl e c: o o p e r a c i ó n a d m i n i s t r a t i v a
 LA COMISIÓN MIXTA,
 i J i s t o el A c n e r d o d e A s o c "i a c: ¡ o n e n t r e la C o m u n i d a cl E c. o n d m i c. a
 E u r o p e a y la R e p ú b I i c: a ci e M a I 1 a ( ?.. ) , f i r m a (J o e 1 5 de
 d i '•' i e m b r e cl e 1 9 7 0 .
 M i s t o e l P r o t o c o I o f i r m a cl o ¿I 14 d e d i r i e m h r e cl e I 9 8 E¡ c: o ni o
 c: o n s e c i i e n c. i a d e 1 a a cl h '•• s i d n cl c- E s p a ñ a y cl e P o r t u g a i a l a s
 C o m u n i •"'! a cl e s E u r o p e a s y , e n p • • r t i c u 1 a r , s u a a t i c: u 1 o ?.. 4 ,
 C o n s "i d e r a n cl o g u c... c: o m o . o n • <•• < 11 e ia s i a d e I a a d b e s i d n cl e E s p a i'i a
 y cl e P o r 11; g a ! a 1 a s C o m 11 n i d H d c s E 11 r o p e a s , d e b e m o cl i f i c: a r s e
 e '! P r o t o c o I o r e I a t i v o ,\ I a d e f i n i c: i d n cl e p r o cl u c t o s
 0 r i g i n a r i o s y a 1 o s ni e t o d o s d e c: o o p e r a c: i 6 n a cl m i n i s t r a t i v a ,
 t: a a d c; I a n t e d a n o m i n a cl o " P r o t o r o> I o o r i g i n a Ï'' i o " ( 3 ) , t a n t o
 d e s d e e I P CI n t o c! e o i s t a t é r n i r. • c o m o cl e s d e c* I p u n t o d e v i s t a
 ci e 1 a s c! i s p o s i c: i o n e s t r a n s ¡ t • > r i ai:- n e c: e s a r i a s p a r a ci n a
 c: o i • r e c: t a a r» 1 i c: a c: i d n cl e I r é a i m • • n c o m e r c i a I p r e v i s t o en I o s
 :
 P roto c: o 1 o <> v e s ci I t- a n t e s d e ! ï c ' • a a d h e s i d n ;
 C o n s i d e r a n d e q ci e ! a s d i s p <>
 . a -j r •• o n e • • t r a n s i t o r i a s cl e b e n
 g a r a nt i ? a r ! a a p I ï c: a c: i o a c: o r r e c t a d e cl i c: h a s cl i s p o s i c: i o n e s
 comerciales entre l a Corn a n i a a d en s u rom p o s i c: i d n a l 31 de
 d i c i e m b r e fie 198 5 y E s p a ñ a o P-"cl " u g a ' l , p o r u n a p a r t e , y l a
 P ;•• p t !) ! i ;. a d !•• n1 a I t a , por o t > i ;
 ù E C i: D f •
 Ar t icu! o p r tm a r a
 I. a ••'• cl i s p o s i c i o 11 e s \ <:> 1 P r o t o r o ! o o r i g i n a r i o q u e s e i n cl i c. a 11 <:i
 r o s 11 i n ci a c: : 6 a q 11 e c! a n m o d ï 1 : r a • î a s cl e I s i g u i e n t e m o cl o :
 1 .) S e ( • a s t i t i.i y e i • i s e g u n • ' ' p a r Ï' a E o cl e 1 a r t i c ci I o I9 por eI
 s i n a i e n t •< t e ;-•; • <• :
 " ! o s c: e r t i f i c a d o s E U R . t ex p e d i cl o s a p o s t e r i o r i cl e b e r a n
 ï r- p ;•' o v i s t o s d e ci n a c! e I a > ¡ a ci i c a c i o n e s s i y u i e n t e s :
 ( 2 » DO n ° ! de '! 4 . 3 . 1 9 ¡M , p .
 ( '•' ) DO n ° ! '• cl e 2 8 . 4 . 1 9 7 o , p .
 SS~
 ---pagebreak--- ... 4...
 " D E L I O R E A P O S T E R I O R I"
 "UDSTEDT EFTEPFOLGEND!"
 " N A C H 7 R A G I... I C H A U S G E S T E II. T "
 " E K A 0 8 E N EK T O N V X T E P Ü N "
 "ISSUEb RETROSPECTIUELY"
 " E X P E D I D O A P O S T E R I O R I"
 "R II.. A S C I A T O A P O S T E R I O R ! "
 " A E G E GE V E N A P O S T E R I O P I "
 "EMITIDO A POSTERIOR"
 ?) Se s ti s t i t ti y e e l t ext o de! a i • t í r: ti l o 20 de I s i g ti i e n t e ni o d o :
 " E n t: a <:• o tl e r o b o , p é r d i d a o el e s t r u c c i o n d e ti n c: e r t i f i e: a d o
 E U R . I , e l e x p o r t a d o r p o d i • a r e c I a ni a r a 'i a s a ti t o r i el a d e s
 a d u a n e r a s q ti e I o h a y a n e x p e d i tl o ti n el ti p 1 i e. a d o s o b r e I a
 b a s e d e I o s el o e u ni e n t o s el e ex p o r t a c i d n q ti e o b r e n e n s u
 p o d e r . E I d u p I i e: a d o a s i e K P e el i el o el e b e r á l l e v a r ti na de l a s
 i n d i c a c ¡ o n e s s i g ti i e n t e s :
 " D U P L. I C A T A "
 "DUP!. 1 C A A T "
 "DUPIIKHT"
 " A I S TI I PAíDO"
 "DUPLICADO"
 "DUPL l CATO"
 "DUPLÍCATE"
 "SEGUNDA OÍA"
 3) I! I a r t i c ti lo 2.9 s e s ti s i. i i- ti i i a p o r' e ! L e x t o s i g ti i e n t e :
 "Art. i cu I •::• •• y
 L a s i n e r » a n c ¡ ... vi f:¡ ti f r e ú n a n '! o s r e q ti i •••, i r o •: el e i T i l . ti 1 o I. q ti e
 en e l I de a b r i l ele I 9;:;y <;, e e n c u e n t r e n en t r á n s i t o , o
 e: o I o •.. a d a s e n I a C o m ti n i e! <i el, e n 1 a s I s I a s 0 a n a r i a s ., C e ti L a y
 M e 1 i 1 '! a o en n a 1 1 a , a '! a iu ¡ • a r o el e 1 r é a i m e n d e el e p d s i t o
 p r o v i s i o n a 1 , de el e p o s i t o s aü t¡ a n e r o s o ¡ > e 7 o n a s f r a n e a s ,
 P o (.1 Í •• a 11 b c ii e f i e : a r s e de ¡ , r, e! i s p o s i c i o s e s d e I A e: ti e r d o , a
 r e s e r v a el e 1 :.i p r e s e n !'. ,-je i o i • , >• • 1> un p '! a z o d e s e "i s ni e s e s a
 P a r l" i r e! e e! i ¡ i ¡ :• f e e h ,-¡ , .. i n i e ¡ <• s a ti t o r i el a el e s a el ti a 11 e r a s el e I
 Est ido e! e i ni p o r i' Í C I O . 1 , e> e ¡¡ n :: e r• ¡. i f i eaclo EUR . 1 ext end i do
 a p (.- '••> i: e r i o r i p o r '! a s a a t. o r i na d e s c o m p e t e n t. e s el e i L s t a t:l o
 de e x p o l i a c i ó n , a s í ton.••• de l o s d-j t. time n I o s justificativos
 i! i' I ' i' .i ir-, j--o r I r d i r i- c l o ' .
 í i :> e i a '•:. í' r 1' a r ó r¡ I o •:•• a r t í c s I o s •.> i >;i n i e n t e s :
 ---pagebreak--- "AÏ"1 t i <: u 1 o 3 I
 A I o s e f e c: t o s cl e l a a p 1 i c a c i d n de l a s d i s p o s i c i o n e s cl e I
 P r o t o c o I o a el i c: i o n a 1 r e I a t i v a s a I o s p r o d u c t o s o r i g i n a r i o s
 d e i a s I s 1 a s C a n a r i a s , f J e Ce u t a y de M e I i 1 I a , s e a p I i c: a r á
 m u t a t i s m u t a n cl i s e 1 p r e s e 111 e P r o t o c o I o , s i n p e r ;j u i c i o d e
 ! a s c: o n d i c: i o n e s p a r t i r u I a r e s cl e f i n i d a s e n 1 o s a r t i c: u 1 o s
 3? a 3 4 s i g ci i e u t e s " .
 " A r t í cu 1 o 32
 !.. a e x p r e s i o n " C o m u n i cl a d " u t i l i z a c! a en e I p r e s e n t e
 p r o t o c: o I o n o s e r e E i e r e a 1 a s I s 1 a s C a n a r i a s , C e u t a o
 M e 1 i 1 1 a . !.. a ex p r e s i d n " p r o c! a s t o s o r i g i n a r i o s d e la
 C o m u n i d ad" n o s e r e t i e r e a I o s p r o cl u c: t o s o r i g i n a r i o s de
 1 a s I s I a s C a n a r i a s , cl e C e u t a y d e M e I i 1 1 a " .
 " A r t i c: ci '! o 3 3
 1 . E n ••;> ci s t i t u c: i '"• n d e ! a r t ' c : ! o 1 s e r á n a p "! i c. a b 1 e s 1 o s
 a P a r t a d o s s i gui e n t e s , y 1 a s r e f e r e n c i a s a d i c: h o
 a r t í c. a I o s e a p I i c: a r á 11 " m ci t a t i s m u t a n d i s " al p r e s e n t e
 a r t i c: a I o .
 2 . Si n p C' T"1 j 11 i c. i o d e q ne b a y t: n s i cl o t r a n s p o r t a d o s
 cl i r e c t a m e n t e de c: o n I" o r m i c! a d c o n I o .'J i s p ci e s t o e n c; I
 a r t i c: ci 1 o s : s e c: o n s i cl e l a a a i n c: o m o :
 a) p r o cl ci c: t o s o r i g i n a r i <-> s cl e 1as I s 1 as Canaria s , Ce ut «
 y Me I i 11a;
 i ) 1 o s. p r o cl i ! r t o s e 111 ••' r a m e n t e o b t e n i c! o s en ha1 t a;
 i i ) 1 o s p r o cl u c i o ••- o b i s r ; do s e n I a s I s I a s C a n a r i a s ,
 c e a f a y Me I > ; ! a y N I C: CI y a E a b r i c: a c: i d n s e h a y a n
 a'1 i ! i z a d o p r o cl u •.. » o s d i s I: i n t o a .de l o s
 c o n "t e m p ! a c! o s e n < • ! i n c i s o i ) , s i e m p r e q u e t a 1 e s
 p r o d u c t o s h a y a n <;; i ci o o b j e t o de e 1 a b o r a c: i o n e s o
 t r a ; i s f o r m a c i o n e s s ci t M I e i i t <•• s c o n a r r e g 1 o a l
 a p a r t a dc l de ! a s t í a u i o 3 , S i n e m b a r g o , e s t a
 c. o n d ; c: « d a no • e r a i r ! i c a b I e a I o s p r o d u c: t o s
 o r i "< i n a r- i o • , s o n a r e e g i o a ! n r e s r n t c P r o l; < < c. o i o ,
 de f-: H i Va o de ! • »'' o m u n i cl a d , c u a n d o s e les
 • o m e t a , eu '!-,••, c l a s C a n ¿ i n a s , C ¡ u t a y M e I i I 1 a ,
 a e I a b o r a c i o in: s a t r a n s f o r m a c: i o n e s q ci e s u p e ¡' e n
 ! a s r i a b o r a e i o n e s o t. r a n s f o r m a c i o n e s
 i P : • ; ' i c ! e n t e s r: c 11 e m p 1 a d a s e n c 1 a p a r t a cl o 3 d e 1
 a i ' t i i. u i o 3 .
 y>
 ---pagebreak--- b ) pro ductos or iginar i os de M a1 t a .
 i) lo s pr o d u c t o s e n t e r a m e n t e o b t e n i d o s en M a It a;
 i i ) l o s p r o d u c: t o s o b t e n i d o s e n M a I t a y e n c u y a
 f a b r i c a c i ó ri s e 11 a y a n u t i 1 i z a d o p r o d u c t o s
 d i s t: i n t o s d e 1 o s c: o n t e m p 1 a d o s e n e 1 i n c i s o i ) ,
 s i e m p r e q u e t a 1 e s pro d u c t o s h a y a n s i d o o b j e t o d e
 t r a n s f o r m a c: i o n e s s u t i ci e n t e s c: o n a r r e g l o al
 a p a r t a cl o 1 d e I a r t i c: u 1 o 3 . S i n e m t) a r g o , e s t a
 c o n d i c: i ó n n o s e r á a p I i c: a b 1 e a I u s p r o d u c t o s q u e
 s e a n o r i g i n a ri o s, c o n a r r eg I o a i p r e s e n t e
 P r o t o c: o 1 o , d e 1 a s I s I a c; C a n a r i a s , d e C e u t a y d e
 M e ! i I1 a o de la C e n u n i d a d , c u a n d o s e a n o b j e t o d e
 e I a b o r a c i o n e s o v e a n s f o r m a ::; i o n e s e n M a l t a q u e
 s a p e r e n la s e 1 a b o r a c i o n e s o t r a n s f o r m a c: i o n e s
 •; n s u f -i c: i cait e s c: o 111 e m p 1 a cl a s e n e I a p a r t a el o 3 d e 1
 a r I í c u '! o 3
 3 . E a s I s ! a s C a n a r i a s , 0 r 111 a y M e I i 1 i a s e c: o n s i cl e r a r á n
 c o m o u n tí n i c o t e r r i t o r i o .
 4 . E 1 e x p o r t a d o r o s u r e p r e<: e u t a n t e b a b i I i r; a d o e s t a r á
 0 b I i g a d o a i n el i c a r I a s r e í e r e a c i a s " M a 1 t a " e " I s 1 a s
 C a n a r i a s , C e u I a y M e M i l a " e n ! a e: a s i l i a 2 d e I
 c: e r t • 1 i c a cl o E tJ R . ! y en 1 a c a s i I i a 1 d e I f o r m u 1 a ï'1 i o
 E U R . 2 . A cl (/. ¡n á s , e u e I c: a s o d e p r o d u c: t o s o r i g i n a r i o s d e
 1 a s I s '! a s C a n av i a s o fi e C e u t a y M e ! i 1 1 a , s e d e b e r á
 i n cl ! c a r e 1 t. a r á c: i e r o r i a i n a r i o e n I a c a s i l l a 4 d e 1
 c: e r t i f i c a d o E II R . i y ;• n ! a i : a ci i 1 1 a E¡ el e I f o r m u 1 a r i o
 E U R . ?..
 !:.i . L o s p c du et o s e nu m e r a d e . en cl Anexo II. quedarán
 c ••< c I u i d o '•* t em po r a I me n ' e d <•> I á m b i t o ci e a \ I i c: a c i d n d e !
 Pr es ent e Pr o t o c o lo. No oii •> t a n t e , ser a n d e a p I i c a c i d n a
 c! i i : h ••• s p i ' o » ! u c: t o s . m u t. a i ! > m u t and i s , I as di s po s i ci o n e s
 e n mater i a ci e c: o o p e r a c i o n a cl m i n i s t r a t iv a" .
 "Art f cul o 34
 C o r r e s p o n d e r á a l a s a u t o r i d a ci e s a d u a n e r a s españolas
 g a r .•• a t i z a r } a a p í ¡ c a e i o n d e I P ï'' o t o c o 1 o e n I a s I s 1 a s
 c a n a "• i a c; y e n C e u t a y M i- I i 11 a " .
 y
 ---pagebreak--- .... "?....
 A T ' t i C U I O ?..
 La presente Decision entraña en vigor- el I de abril de ¡vwy
 H echo e n , e'I
 P o r e ! C o n s e j o d e A s o c: i a c i (5 n
 F I Pnesi de nt e
 ---pagebreak--- F iche d'impact PMF
 Proposition de 2 règlements du Conseil concernant l'application des Décisions
 des Conseils d'Association CEE-Chypre et CEE-Malte modifiant, en raison de
 l'adhésion de l'Espagne et du Portugal aux Cominmunaut es européennes, le
 Protocole relatif à la définition de la notion de p r o d u i t s originaires et aux
 méthodes de coopération administrative.
 Ces p r o p o s i t i o n s ne sont pas c o n s i d é r é e s présenter des effets négatifs pour les
 petites et m o y e n n e s entreprises.
 Le Task Force PME a approuvé cette position.
 o?0
 ---pagebreak--- ISSN 0257-9545
 COM (90) 129/2 final
 DOCUMENTOS
 ES 02 i l
 N° de catálogo : CB-CO-90-218-ES-C
 ISBN 92-77-60312-7
 PRECIO DE VENTA hasta 30 páginas: 3,50 ECU por cada Í0 páginas más: 1,25 ECU
 Oficina de Publicaciones Oficiales de las Comunidades Europeas
 L-2985 Luxemburgo


text:
 3.4.2017
 CS
 Úřední věstník Evropské unie
 C 104/27
 Žádost o rozhodnutí o předběžné otázce podaná Oberster Gerichtshof (Rakousko) dne 19. prosince 2016 – Peter Valach a další v. Waldviertler Sparkasse Bank AG a další
 (Věc C-649/16)
 (2017/C 104/40)
 Jednací jazyk: němčina
 Předkládající soud
 Oberster Gerichtshof
 Účastníci původního řízení
 Žalobci: Peter Valach, Alena Valachová, Europa SC ZV II a.s., Europa SC LV a.s., VAV Parking a.s., Europa SC BB a.s., Byty A s.r.o
 Žalovaní: Waldviertler Sparkasse Bank AG, Československá obchodná banka a.s., město Banská Bystrica
 Předběžné otázky
 Je třeba čl. 1 odst. 2 písm. b) nařízení Evropského parlamentu a Rady (EU) č. 1215/2012 o příslušnosti a uznávání a výkonu soudních rozhodnutí v občanských a obchodních věcech (1) vykládat tak, že se žaloba na náhradu škody z titulu deliktní odpovědnosti podaná držiteli podílů na společnosti, která je dlužníkem v úpadku – jimiž je první žalobce a druhá žalobkyně – a projektovými společnostmi, které mají s dlužníkem v úpadku obchodní vztahy – jako je tomu v případě třetí až sedmé žalobkyně – proti členům věřitelského výboru z důvodu jejich protiprávního jednání při hlasování o restrukturalizačním plánu v insolvenčním řízení, týká insolvenčního řízení ve smyslu čl. 1 odst. 2 písm. b) nařízení č. 1215/2012 a je proto vyloučena z věcné působnosti tohoto nařízení?
 (1) Úř. věst. L 351, s. 1.