type: contracts

text:
 Dôležité právne oznámenie
 |
 21995A0620(01)
 Úradný vestník L 134 , 20/06/1995 S. 0026 - 0036
 Dohodavo forme výmeny listov medzi Európskym spoločenstvom a Spojenými štátmi americkými o vládnom obstarávaníJeho Excelencia Sir Leon Brittan,komisár,Komisia Európskych spoločenstiev,200 Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat,1049 BruselWashington 30. mája 1995Vážený pán komisár,S odvolaním sa na diskusiu, ktorá sa konala medzi zástupcami vlády Spojených štátov amerických (ďalej len USA) a Európskym spoločenstvom (ďalej len ES), týkajúcu sa vládneho obstarávania, mám tú česť potvrdiť toto:1. USA a ES súhlasia so zmenou a doplnením príslušného dodatku I k Dohode o vládnom obstarávaní, podpísanej v Marakeši 15. apríla 1994, ako je uvedené v dodatkoch tohto listu.2. USA poskytnú dodávateľom tovaru a služieb ES, vrátane stavebných služieb, režim, ktorý nie je menej výhodný ako ten, ktorý sa poskytuje dodávateľom pre prístavný orgán Massachussets a pre štáty Západná Virgínia, Severná Dakota a pokiaľ ide o Illinois, pre obstarávanie, na ktoré sa nevzťahuje dohoda o vládnom obstarávaní a pre dodávateľov, ktorí sú mimo mesta pre mestá Boston, Chicago, Dallas, Detroit, Indianapolis, Nashville a San Antonio.3. USA a ES súhlasia so spoluprácou a prijatím všetkých potrebných opatrení na podstatné zlepšenie transparentnosti oznámení o plánovanom obstarávaní s cieľom zaistenia, aby sa mohli zmluvy, na ktoré sa vzťahuje dohoda o vládnom obstarávaní, jasne identifikovať.4. USA a ES súhlasia, že záznam o porozumení medzi USA a ES o vládnom obstarávaní z 25. mája 1993 sa predĺži až do nadobudnutia platnosti Dohody o vládnom obstarávaní, podpísanej v Marakeši 15. apríla 1994.5. USA súhlasia, že vykonajú svoje záväzky týkajúce sa správy vidieckej elektrifikácie, ktoré sú obsahom dodatku 3 tohto priloženého dodatku I, čo možno najskôr po nadobudnutí platnosti tejto dohody, ale najneskôr v čase nadobudnutia platnosti Dohody ustanovujúcej Svetovú obchodnú organizáciu.Bol by som Vám vďačný, pán komisár, ak by ste potvrdili, že tento list a jeho dodatky správne vyjadrujú dohodu, ku ktorej sme dospeli.Navrhujem, ak ES súhlasí, že tento list, jeho dodatky a Vaša odpoveď v tomto zmysle budú predstavovať Dohodu medzi ES a vládou USA, ktorá sa uzaviera k tomuto dátumu, s výnimkou uvedeného bodu 2, ktorý nadobudne platnosť po nadobudnutí platnosti Dohody o vládnom obstarávaní, podpísanej v Marakeši 15. apríla 1994.Prijmite, prosím, pán komisár, výraz mojej najhlbšej úcty.S úctou,+++++ TIFF +++++Michael KantorPrílohy:Zmenené a doplnené prílohy 2 a 3 a Všeobecné poznámky dodatku I Spojených štátov.Zmenené a doplnené všeobecné poznámky a výnimky z ustanovení článku III dodatku I ES.Veľvyslanec Michael Kantor,obchodný zástupca Spojených štátovVýkonný úrad predseduWASHINGTON DC 20506(Spojené štáty americké)Brusel .30. mája 1995Vážený pán veľvyslanec,Mám tú česť, potvrdiť prijatie Vášho listu dnešného dátumu nasledujúceho znenia:"S odvolaním sa na diskusiu, ktorá sa konala medzi zástupcami vlády Spojených štátov amerických (ďalej len USA) a Európskym spoločenstvom (ďalej len ES), týkajúcu sa vládneho obstarávania, mám tú česť potvrdiť toto:1. USA a ES súhlasia so zmenou a doplnením príslušného dodatku I k Dohode o vládnom obstarávaní, podpísanej v Marakeši 15. apríla 1994, ako je uvedené v dodatkoch tohto listu.2. USA poskytnú dodávateľom tovaru a služieb ES, vrátane stavebných služieb, režim, ktorý nie je menej výhodný ako ten, ktorý sa poskytuje dodávateľom pre prístavný orgán Massachussets a pre štáty Západná Virgínia, Severná Dakota a pokiaľ ide o Illinois, pre obstarávanie, na ktoré sa nevzťahuje dohoda o vládnom obstarávaní a pre dodávateľov, ktorí sú mimo mesta pre mestá Boston, Chicago, Dallas, Detroit, Indianapolis, Nashville a San Antonio.3. USA a ES súhlasia so spoluprácou a prijatím všetkých potrebných opatrení na podstatné zlepšenie transparentnosti oznámení o plánovanom obstarávaní s cieľom zaistenia, aby sa mohli zmluvy, na ktoré sa vzťahuje dohoda o vládnom obstarávaní, jasne identifikovať.4. USA a ES súhlasia, že záznam o porozumení medzi USA a ES o vládnom obstarávaní z 25. mája 1993 sa predĺži až do nadobudnutia platnosti Dohody o vládnom obstarávaní, podpísanej v Marakeši 15. apríla 1994.5. USA súhlasia, že vykonajú svoje záväzky týkajúce sa správy vidieckej elektrifikácie, ktoré sú obsahom dodatku 3 tohto priloženého dodatku I, čo možno najskôr po nadobudnutí platnosti tejto dohody, ale najneskôr v čase nadobudnutia platnosti Dohody ustanovujúcej Svetovú obchodnú organizáciu.Bol by som Vám vďačný, pán komisár, ak by ste potvrdili, že tento list a jeho dodatky správne vyjadrujú dohodu, ku ktorej sme dospeli.Navrhujem, ak ES súhlasí, že tento list, jeho dodatky a Vaša odpoveď v tomto zmysle budú predstavovať Dohodu medzi ES a vládou USA, ktorá sa uzaviera k tomuto dátumu, s výnimkou uvedeného bodu 2, ktorý nadobudne platnosť po nadobudnutí platnosti Dohody o vládnom obstarávaní, podpísanej v Marakeši 15. apríla 1994.Prijmite, prosím, pán komisár, výraz mojej najhlbšej úcty.S úctou,Michael KantorPrílohy:Zmenené a doplnené prílohy 2 a 3 a Všeobecné poznámky dodatku I Spojených štátov.Zmenené a doplnené všeobecné poznámky a výnimky z ustanovení článku III dodatku I ES."Mám tú česť potvrdiť, že ES súhlasí so spoločnou dohodou uvedenou vo Vašom liste a jej dodatkami, ako aj s tým, že Váš list, táto odpoveď a dodatky predstavujú dohodu medzi ES a vládou USA.Prijmite, prosím, pán veľvyslanec, výraz mojej najhlbšej úcty.S úctou,+++++ TIFF +++++Leon Brittan--------------------------------------------------ZMENENÉ A DOPLNENÉ PRÍLOHY 2 A 3 A VŠEOBECNÉ POZNÁMKY DODATKU I SPOJENÝCH ŠTÁTOVPRÍLOHA 2SUBJEKTY PODRIADENÉ ÚSTREDNEJ VLÁDE, KTORÉ OBSTARÁVAJÚ V SÚLADE S USTANOVENIAMI TEJTO DOHODYPrahová hodnota:355000 SDR pre dodávky a služby5 miliónov SDR pre výstavbuZOZNAM SUBJEKTOVArizonaExecutive branch agenciesArkansasExecutive branch agencies, including universities but excluding the Office of Fish and Game and construction servicesCaliforniaExecutive branch agenciesColoradoExecutive branch agenciesConnecticutDepartment of Administrative ServicesConnecticut Department of TransportationConnecticut Department of Public WorksConstituent Units of Higher EducationDelaware (*)Administrative Services (Central Procurement Agency)State UniversitiesState CollegesFlorida (*)Executive branch agenciesHawaiiDepartment of Accounting and General Services (with the exception of procurements of software developed in the state and construction)IdahoCentral Procurement Agency (including all colleges and universities subject to central purchasing oversight)Illinois (*)Department of Central Management ServicesIowa (*)Department of General ServicesDepartment of TransportationBoard of Regents‘ Institutions (universities)KansasExecutive branch agencies, excluding construction services, automobiles and aircraftKentuckyDivision of Purchases, Finance and Administration Cabinet, excluding construction projectsLouisianaExecutive branch agenciesMaine (*)Department of Administrative and Financial ServicesBureau of General Services (covering State government agencies and school construction)Maine Department of TransportationMaryland (*)Office of the TreasuryDepartment of the EnvironmentDepartment of General ServicesDepartment of Housing and Community DevelopmentDepartment of Human ResourcesDepartment of Licensing and RegulationDepartment of Natural ResourcesDepartment of Public Safety and Correctional ServicesDepartment of PersonnelDepartment of TransportationMassachusettsExecutive Office for Administration and FinanceExecutive Office of Communities and DevelopmentExecutive Office of Consumer AffairsExecutive Office of Economic AffairsExecutive Office of EducationExecutive Office of Elder AffairsExecutive Office of Environmental AffairsExecutive Office of Health and Human ServiceExecutive Office of LaborExecutive Office of Public SafetyExecutive Office of Transportation and ConstructionMichigan (*)Department of Management and BudgetMinnesotaExecutive branch agenciesMississippiDepartment of Finance and Administration (does not include services)MissouriOffice of AdministrationDivision of Purchasing and Materials ManagementMontanaExecutive branch agencies (only for services and construction)New York (*)State agenciesState university systemPublic authorities and public benefit corporations, with the exception of those entities with multi-state mandatesIn addition to the exceptions noted at the end of this Annex, transit cars, buses and related equipment are not coveredNebraskaCentral Procurement AgencyNew Hampshire (*)Central Procurement AgencyOklahoma (*)Office of Public Affairs and all State agencies and departments subject to the Oklahoma Central Purchasing Act, excluding construction servicesOregonDepartment of Administrative ServicesPennsylvania (*)Executive branch agencies, including:Governor's OfficeDepartment of the Auditor GeneralTreasury DepartmentDepartment of AgricultureDepartment of BankingPennsylvania Securities CommissionDepartment of HealthDepartment of TransportationInsurance DepartmentDepartment of AgingDepartment of CorrectionDepartment of Labor and IndustryDepartment of Military AffairsOffice of Attorney GeneralDepartment of General ServicesDepartment of EducationPublic Utility CommissionDepartment of RevenueDepartment of StatePennsylvania State PoliceDepartment of Public WelfareFish CommissionGame CommissionDepartment of CommerceBoard of Probation and ParoleLiquor Control BoardMilk Marketing BoardLieutenant Governor's OfficeDepartment of Community AffairsPennsylvania Historical and Museum CommissionPennsylvania Emergency Management AgencyState Civil Service CommissionPennsylvania Public Television NetworkDepartment of Environmental ResourcesState Tax Equalization BoardDepartment of Public WelfareState Employees‘ Retirement SystemPennsylvania Municipal Retirement BoardPublic School Employees‘ Retirement SystemPennsylvania Crime CommissionExecutive OfficesRhode IslandExecutive branch agencies, excluding boats, automobiles, buses and related equipmentSouth DakotaCentral Procuring Agency (including universities and penal institutions)In addition to the exceptions noted at the end of this Annex, procurements of beef are not coveredTennesseeExecutive branch agencies (excluding services and construction)TexasGeneral Services CommissionUtahExecutive branch agenciesVermontExecutive branch agenciesWashingtonWashington State executive branch agencies, including:General AdministrationDepartment of TransportationState UniversitiesIn addition to the exceptions noted at the end of this Annex, procurements of fuel, paper products, boats, ships and vessels are not coveredWisconsinExecutive branch agencies, including:Department of AdministrationState Correctional InstitutionsDepartment of DevelopmentEducational Communications BoardDepartment of Employment RelationsState Historical SocietyDepartment of Health and Social ServicesInsurance CommissionerDepartment of JusticeLottery BoardDepartment of Natural ResourcesAdministration for Public InstructionRacing BoardDepartment of RevenueState Fair Park BoardDepartment of TransportationState University SystemWyoming (*)Procurement Services DivisionWyoming Department of TransportationUniversity of WyomingPoznámky k prílohe 2Okrem podmienok uvedených vo všeobecných poznámkach platia nasledovné podmienky:1. Pre štáty označené hviezdičkou s predtým existujúcimi obmedzeniami sa dohoda neuplatňuje na obstarávanie konštrukčnej ocele (vrátane požiadaviek na subdodávateľov), motorových vozidiel a uhlia.2. Dohoda sa neuplatňuje na výhody alebo obmedzenia spojené s programami podporujúcimi rozvoj oblastí postihnutých hospodárskou krízou a z rozsahu sú vylúčené spoločnosti, ktorých vlastníkmi sú menšiny, invalidní vojnoví vyslúžilci a ženy.3. Žiaden text uvedený v tejto prílohe sa nevysvetľuje tak, aby sa zabránilo akémukoľvek štátnemu subjektu pri uplatňovaní obmedzení, ktoré podporujú všeobecnú kvalitu životného prostredia v tomto štáte, pokiaľ takéto obmedzenia nepredstavujú skryté prekážky pre medzinárodný obchod.4. Táto dohoda sa nevzťahuje na žiadne obstarávanie vykonávané oprávneným subjektom v mene nezahrnutých subjektov na inej vládnej úrovni.5. Táto dohoda sa neuplatňuje na obmedzenia spojené s federálnymi finančnými prostriedkami pre hromadný tranzit a diaľničné projekty.--------------------------------------------------PRÍLOHA 3VŠETKY OSTATNÉ SUBJEKTY, KTORÉ OBSTARÁVAJÚ V SÚLADE S USTANOVENIAMI TEJTO DOHODYPrahová hodnota:400000 SDR pre dodávky a služby (okrem toho, ako je uvedené)5 miliónov SDR pre výstavbuZOZNAM SUBJEKTOVThe following entities at the SDR equivalent of $ 250000 for supplies and services:Tennessee Valley AuthorityPower Marketing Administrations of the Department of Energy- Bonneville Power Administration- Western Area Power Administration- Southeastern Power Administration- Southwestern Power Administration- Alaska Power AdministrationSt Lawrence Seaway Development CorporationThe following entities at 400000 SDRs for supplies and services:The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey with the following exceptions:- maintenance, repair and operating materials and supplies (e.g. hardware, tools, lamps/lighting, plumbing),- in exceptional cases, individual procurements may require certain regional production of goods if authorized by the Board of Directors,- procurements pursuant to multi-jurisdictional agreement (i.e. for contracts which have initially been awarded by other jurisdictions).The Port of Baltimore (subject to the conditions specified for the state of Maryland in Annex 2)The New York Power Authority (subject to the conditions specified for the state of New York in Annex 2)Rural Electrification Administration Financing:1. waiver of Buy American restrictions on financing for all power generation projects (restrictions on financing for telecommunication projects are excluded from the Agreement);2. application of Code-equivalent procurement procedures and national treatment to funded projects exceeding the thresholds specified above.Poznámky k prílohe 31. Pokiaľ ide o tieto subjekty, dohoda sa neuplatňuje na obmedzenia spojené s federálnymi finančnými prostriedkami na projekty letísk.2. Na túto prílohu sa uplatňujú podmienky uvedené vo všeobecných poznámkach.Všeobecné poznámky1. Bez ohľadu na uvedené skutočnosti, táto dohoda sa neuplatňuje na prostriedky vyčlenené pre malé a menšinové podniky.2. S výnimkou toho, ak by bolo uvedené v tomto dodatku inak, obstarávanie týkajúce sa rozsahu na strane USA nezahŕňa nezmluvné dohody alebo akúkoľvek formu vládnej pomoci, vrátane dohôd o spolupráci, finančných podporách, pôžičkách, majetkových vkladoch, zárukách, daňových stimuloch a vládnom zabezpečení tovaru a služieb osobám alebo vládnym orgánom, ktoré nie sú osobitne zahrnuté v prílohách USA k tejto dohode.3. Obstarávanie nezahŕňa nákupy daňovej agentúry alebo vkladových služieb, likvidačných a riadiacich služieb pre regulované finančné inštitúcie a predaj a distribučných služieb pre vládny dlh.4. Tam, kde sa má kúpno-predajná zmluva schváliť subjektom, na ktorý sa nevzťahuje táto dohoda, táto dohoda sa nevykladá ako zahŕňajúca akúkoľvek zložku tovaru alebo služieb tejto kúpno-predajnej zmluvy.5. Pre tovar a služby nasledovných krajín a dodávateľov takéhoto tovaru a služieb (vrátane výstavby) sa táto dohoda nevzťahuje na obstarávanie subjektmi uvedenými v prílohách 2 a 3, ani na zrieknutie sa opísané v prílohe 3:KanadaŠvajčiarskoNórskoJaponskoSpojené štáty sú pripravené zmeniť a doplniť túto poznámku vtedy, ak sa bude môcť vyriešiť obsah týchto príloh s uvedenou stranou v zozname.6. Pre stavebné služby Kórejskej republiky a dodávateľov takýchto služieb sa táto dohoda uplatňuje iba na obstarávanie subjektov uvedených v prílohách 2 a 3 nad prahové hodnoty 15 miliónov SDR.7. Pre tovar a služby (vrátane výstavby) z Japonska a dodávateľov takéhoto tovaru a služieb sa táto dohoda neuplatňuje na obstarávanie Národnou navigačnou a kozmickou správou.8. Služby uvedené v prílohe 4 sú zahrnuté, pokiaľ ide o konkrétnu stranu iba do rozsahu, v akom táto strana zahrnula tieto služby do svojej prílohy 4.ZMENENÉ A DOPLNENÉ VŠEOBECNÉ POZNÁMKY A VÝNIMKY Z USTANOVENÍ ČLÁNKU III DODATKU I ESVšeobecné poznámky a výnimky z ustanovení článku III1. ES neposkytne výhody tejto dohody:- pokiaľ ide o schválenie zmlúv uvedených v prílohe 2 dodávateľom a poskytovateľom služieb Kanady,- pokiaľ ide o schválenie zmlúv, iných ako pre dodávky, uvedených v prílohe 2 dodávateľom a poskytovateľom služieb USA,- pokiaľ ide o schválenie zmlúv subjektami uvedenými v prílohe 3 písmenoa) (voda) dodávateľom a poskytovateľom služieb z Kanady a USA;b) (elektrina) dodávateľom a poskytovateľom služieb z Kanady, Hong Kongu a Japonska;c) (letiská) dodávateľom a poskytovateľom služieb z Kanady, Kórei a USA;d) (prístavy) dodávateľom a poskytovateľom služieb z Kanady;e) (mestská doprava) dodávateľom a poskytovateľom služieb z Kanady, Izraela, Japonska, Kórei a USApokiaľ ES nepripustí, že príslušné strany poskytujú porovnateľný a efektívny prístup podnikom ES na príslušné trhy:- poskytovateľom služieb strán, ktoré nezahŕňajú zmluvy o poskytovaní služieb pre príslušné subjekty v prílohách 1 až 3 a príslušnú kategóriu služieb pod prílohami 4 a 5 do svojho vlastného rozsahu.2. Ustanovenia článku XX sa neuplatňujú na dodávateľov a poskytovateľov služieb:- Izraela, Japonska, Kórei a Švajčiarska pri súťaži o schválenie zmluvy subjektmi uvedenými v prílohe 2 odsek 2, až kým ES nepripustí, že splnili rozsah subjektov podriadených ústrediu,- Japonska, Kórei a USA pri súťaži o schválenie zmlúv dodávateľovi alebo poskytovateľovi služieb strán iných ako sú tie, ktoré sú uvedené, ktoré sú malé alebo stredné podniky podľa príslušných ustanovení právneho systému ES, až kým ES nepripustí, že už viac nepôsobia diskriminačné opatrenia v prospech určitých domácich malých a menšinových podnikov,- Izraela, Japonska a Kórei pri súťaži o schválenie zmlúv subjektmi ES, ktorých hodnota je nižšia ako prahová hodnota uplatňovaná na rovnakú kategóriu zmlúv schvaľovaných týmito stranami.3. Až dovtedy, pokiaľ ES nepripustí, že príslušné strany poskytujú prístup pre ES dodávateľov a poskytovateľov služieb na svoje vlastné trhy, ES neposkytne výhody tejto dohody dodávateľom a poskytovateľom služieb:- Kanady, pokiaľ ide o obstarávanie FSC 36, 70 a 74 [špeciálne priemyselné stroje, zariadenia na automatické spracovanie údajov na všeobecný účel, počítačové programové vybavenie, zásoby a pomocné vybavenie (okrem 7010 konfigurácie ADPE), kancelárske stroje, zariadenia na vizuálny záznam a ADP zariadenia],- Kanady, pokiaľ ide o obstarávanie FSG 58 (komunikácie, ochrana a zariadenia na koherentné žiarenie) a USA, pokiaľ ide o zariadenia na kontrolu leteckej dopravy,- Kórei a Izraela, pokiaľ ide o obstarávanie subjektmi uvedenými v prílohe 3 písmeno b) týkajúceho sa obstarávania položiek HS č. 8504, 8535, 8537 a 8544 (elektrické transformátory, zástrčky a zásuvky, vypínače a spínače a izolované káble),- USA, pokiaľ ide o obstarávanie subjektmi uvedenými v prílohe 3 písmeno d), pokiaľ ide o obstarávanie bagrovacích služieb a obstarávanie týkajúce sa stavby lodí,- Kanady a USA, čo sa týka zmlúv na súčasti tovaru alebo služieb k zmluvám, ktoré aj keď boli schválené subjektom, na ktorý sa vzťahuje táto dohoda, nepodliehajú tejto dohode.4. Dohoda sa neuplatňuje na zmluvy udelené na základe:- medzinárodnej dohody určenej na spoločné vykonanie alebo využitie projektu signatárskymi štátmi,- medzinárodnej dohody týkajúcej sa pobytu vojska,- konkrétneho postupu medzinárodnej organizácie.5. Táto dohoda sa neuplatňuje na obstarávanie poľnohospodárskych výrobkov uskutočnené na pomoc poľnohospodárskym podporným programom a programom pre ľudskú obživu.6. Nie sú zahrnuté zmluvy schválené subjektmi v prílohách 1 a 2 v súvislosti s činnosťami v oblastiach pitnej vody, energetiky, dopravy alebo telekomunikácií.7. Táto dohoda sa neuplatňuje na zmluvy udelené subjektmi v prílohe 3:- na nákup vody a na dodávku energie alebo palív na výrobu energie,- na účely iné ako vykonávanie činností, ako sú opísané v tejto prílohe alebo na vykonávanie takýchto činností v nečlenskej krajine,- na účely ďalšieho predaja alebo prenájmu tretím stranám za predpokladu, že zmluvný subjekt nevyužíva žiadne osobitné alebo výlučné právo predaja alebo prenájmu predmetu takýchto zmlúv a ostatné subjekty ho môžu predať alebo prenajať za rovnakých podmienok ako zmluvný subjekt.8. Táto dohoda sa nevzťahuje na zmluvy:- týkajúce sa nadobudnutia alebo prenájmu pozemku, existujúcich budov alebo iného nehnuteľného majetku, alebo týkajúce sa práv voči tomuto majetku,- týkajúce sa nadobudnutia, vývoja, produkcie alebo koprodukcie programového materiálu vysielacími stanicami alebo zmlúv o vysielacom čase.9. Táto dohoda sa nevzťahuje na udelenie zmlúv o službách španielskymi subjektmi uvedenými v prílohe 3 do 1. januára 1997 alebo na udelenie zmlúv gréckymi alebo portugalskými subjektmi uvedenými v prílohe 3 do 1. januára 1998.--------------------------------------------------


jurisdiction: EU

text:
 Avis juridique important
 |
 11997D/PRO/05
 Tratado de Amesterdão que altera o Tratado da União Europeia, os Tratados que instituem as Comunidades Europeias e alguns actos relativos a esses Tratados - Protocolos anexos ao Tratado da União Europeia e ao Tratado que institui a Comunidade Europeia - Protocolo relativo à posição da Dinamarca
 Jornal Oficial no C 340 de 10/11/1997 p. 0101
 Tratado de Amesterdão que altera o Tratado da União Europeia, os Tratados que instituem as Comunidades Europeias e alguns actos relativos a esses Tratados - Protocolos anexos ao Tratado da União Europeia e ao Tratado que institui a Comunidade Europeia - Protocolo relativo à posição da DinamarcaAS ALTAS PARTES CONTRATANTES,RECORDANDO a Decisão dos Chefes de Estado ou de Governo, reunidos no Conselho Europeu em Edimburgo, em 12 de Dezembro de 1992, relativa a certos problemas levantados pela Dinamarca no que respeita ao Tratado da União Europeia,TENDO REGISTADO a posição expressa pela Dinamarca no que respeita à cidadania, à união económica e monetária, à política de defesa e à justiça e aos assuntos internos, tal como enunciada na decisão de Edimburgo,TENDO EM CONTA o artigo 3o do Protocolo que integra o acervo de Schengen no âmbito da União Europeia,ACORDARAM nas disposições seguintes, que vêm anexas ao Tratado que institui a Comunidade Europeia e ao Tratado da União Europeia, PARTE I Artigo 1oA Dinamarca não participará na adopção pelo Conselho das medidas propostas em aplicação do Título III-A do Tratado que institui a Comunidade Europeia. Em derrogação do no 2 do artigo 148o do Tratado que institui a Comunidade Europeia, a maioria qualificada é definida como sendo constituída pela mesma proporção dos votos ponderados dos membros do Conselho em causa fixada no citado no 2 do artigo 148o. Será necessária a unanimidade dos membros do Conselho, com excepção do representante do Governo da Dinamarca, para as decisões que o Conselho deva adoptar por unanimidade. Artigo 2oNenhuma disposição do Título III-A do Tratado que institui a Comunidade Europeia, medida adoptada em aplicação desse Título, disposição de acordo internacional celebrado pela Comunidade em aplicação do mesmo Título, ou decisão do Tribunal de Justiça que interprete essas disposições ou medidas vinculará a Dinamarca, nem lhe será aplicável. Essas disposições, medidas ou decisões em nada afectarão as competências, direitos e obrigações da Dinamarca. Essas disposições, medidas ou decisões em nada afectarão o acervo comunitário e não farão parte do direito comunitário, tal como se aplicam à Dinamarca. Artigo 3oA Dinamarca não suportará as consequências financeiras das medidas previstas no artigo 1o, com excepção dos custos administrativos delas decorrentes para as Instituições. Artigo 4oOs artigos 1o, 2o e 3o não são aplicáveis às medidas que determinem quais os países terceiros cujos nacionais devem ser detentores de visto para transporem as fronteiras externas dos Estados-Membros, nem às medidas relativas à criação de um modelo-tipo de visto. Artigo 5o1. A Dinamarca decidirá, no prazo de seis meses após o Conselho ter adoptado uma decisão sobre uma proposta ou iniciativa destinada a desenvolver o acervo de Schengen em aplicação do disposto no Título III-A do Tratado que institui a Comunidade Europeia, se procederá à transposição dessa decisão para o seu direito interno. Se decidir fazê-lo, essa decisão criará uma obrigação de direito internacional entre a Dinamarca e os restantes Estados-Membros a que se refere o artigo 1o do Protocolo que integra o acervo de Schengen no âmbito da União Europeia, bem como a Irlanda ou o Reino Unido, se esses Estados-Membros participarem nos domínios de cooperação em causa.2. Se a Dinamarca decidir não aplicar uma decisão do Conselho na acepção do no 1, os Estados-Membros a que se refere o artigo 1o do Protocolo que integra o acervo de Schengen no âmbito da União Europeia analisarão as medidas adequadas a tomar. PARTE II Artigo 6oNo que respeita às medidas adoptadas pelo Conselho no domínio abrangido pelo no 1 do artigo J.3 e pelo artigo J.7 do Tratado da União Europeia, a Dinamarca não participa na elaboração nem na execução de decisões e acções da União com implicações em matéria de defesa, mas não levantará obstáculos ao desenvolvimento de uma cooperação reforçada entre Estados-Membros neste domínio. Nesse caso, a Dinamarca não participará na sua adopção. A Dinamarca não será obrigada a contribuir para o financiamento das despesas operacionais decorrentes dessas medidas. PARTE III Artigo 7oA Dinamarca pode, a todo o tempo, e de acordo com as suas normas constitucionais, informar os demais Estados-Membros de que não pretende continuar a invocar a totalidade ou de parte do presente Protocolo. Nesse caso, a Dinamarca aplicará integralmente todas as medidas pertinentes então em vigor, tomadas no âmbito da União Europeia.


type: other

text:
7Azs53/2006
 è. j. 7 Azs 53/2006-84
 Nejvy11í správní soud rozhodl v senátì slo3⁄4eném z pøedsedkynì senátu JUDr. Eli1ky Cihláøové a soudcù JUDr. Jaroslava Hubáèka, Mgr. et Ing. et Bc. Radovana Havelce, JUDr. Milady Tomkové a Mgr. Jana Passera v právní vìci stì3⁄4ovatelky V. R., za úèasti Ministerstva vnitra, se sídlem v Praze 7, Nad ©tolou 3, v øízení o kasaèní stí3⁄4nosti proti rozsudku Krajského soudu v Ostravì ze dne 24. 10. 2005, è. j. 63 Az 49/2005-19,
 Krajský soud v Ostravì rozsudkem soudu ze dne 24. 10. 2005, è. j. 63 Az 49/2005-19 zamítl 3⁄4alobu stì3⁄4ovatelky proti rozhodnutí Ministerstva vnitra (dále jen ministerstvo ) ze dne 30. 3. 2005, è. j. OAM-493/VL-07-19-2005, kterým byla zamítnuta 3⁄4ádost stì3⁄4ovatelky o udìlení azylu jako zjevnì nedùvodná podle ustanovení § 16 odst. 1 písm. g) zákona è. 325/1999 Sb., ve znìní pozdìj1ích pøedpisù (dále jen zákon o azylu ).
 V kasaèní stí3⁄4nosti podané v zákonné lhùtì z dùvodù uvedených v ustanovení § 103 odst. 1 s. ø. s. stì3⁄4ovatelka namítala, 3⁄4e krajský soud nepostupoval objektivnì a nevyhodnotil správnì v1echny dùkazy, nezabýval se mo3⁄4ností udìlení humanitárního azylu a vùbec neøe1il otázku, zda se na ní vztahuje èi nevztahuje pøeká3⁄4ka vycestování. Souèasnì stì3⁄4ovatelka po3⁄4ádala o ustanovení advokáta pro øízení o kasaèní stí3⁄4nosti a o pøiznání odkladného úèinku.
 Usnesením Krajského soudu v Ostravì ze dne 19. 12. 2005, è. j. 63 Az 49/2005-31, které nabylo právní moci dne 2. 1. 2006, bylo rozhodnuto, 3⁄4e se stì3⁄4ovatelce neustanovuje zástupce z øad advokátù. Následnì byla stì3⁄4ovatelka usnesením krajského soudu ze dne 15. 2. 2007, è. j. 63 Az 49/2005-75 vyzvána, aby ve lhùtì jednoho mìsíce od doruèení tohoto usnesení dolo3⁄4ila do spisu pøedlo3⁄4ením plné moci zastoupení advokátem v øízení o kasaèní stí3⁄4nosti a doplnila údaje o tom, v jakém rozsahu rozhodnutí soudu napadá, uvedla konkrétní dùvody kasaèní stí3⁄4nosti podle § 103 odst. 1 s. ø. s. a datum, kdy jí byl napadený rozsudek doruèen. Souèasnì byla pouèena, 3⁄4e pokud ve stanovené lhùtì nevyhoví po3⁄4adavkùm krajského soudu a v øízení nebude mo3⁄4no pokraèovat, bude kasaèní stí3⁄4nost odmítnuta. Jeliko3⁄4 stì3⁄4ovatelka nebyla v místì doruèování zasti3⁄4ena, bylo toto usnesení ulo3⁄4eno dne 23. 2. 2007 u po1ty a adresátce zanechána výzva, aby si zásilku vyzvedla. Stì3⁄4ovatelka si v1ak písemnost nevyzvedla, a proto jí toto usnesení bylo náhradnì doruèeno dne 26. 2. 2007.
 Z citovaného ustanovení vyplývá, 3⁄4e povinné zastoupení stì3⁄4ovatelky advokátem v øízení o její kasaèní stí3⁄4nosti proti napadenému rozsudku krajského soudu, je zvlá1tní podmínkou øízení o kasaèní stí3⁄4nosti, její3⁄4 nedostatek lze odstranit, ale bez jejího3⁄4 splnìní nelze rozhodnout ve vìci samé. Stì3⁄4ovatelka podle obsahu spisu právnické vzdìlání nemá a jeliko3⁄4 ani na výzvu krajského soudu ze dne 15. 2. 2007 nepøedlo3⁄4ila plnou moc udìlenou advokátovi pro zastupování v øízení o kasaèní stí3⁄4nosti, neodstranila nedostatek podmínky øízení o tomto mimoøádném opravném prostøedku, který tak brání pokraèování v øízení.
 Nále3⁄4itosti kasaèní stí3⁄4nosti jsou uvedeny v ustanovení § 106 odst. 1 s. ø. s. Pokud je toto podání nemá, musí být podle odst. 3 tého3⁄4 ustanovení doplnìny ve lhùtì jednoho mìsíce od doruèení usnesení, vyzývajícího k odstranìní vad. V tomto pøípadì kasaèní stí3⁄4nost zákonné nále3⁄4itosti podle krajského soudu neobsahovala, a proto tento soud stì3⁄4ovatelku vyzval usnesením ze dne 15. 2. 2007 k odstranìní vad podání, které konkretizoval, a stanovil k odstranìní vad lhùtu v souladu se zákonem. Stì3⁄4ovatelka na tuto výzvu nereagovala a krajským soudem uvádìné vady kasaèní stí3⁄4nosti neodstranila.
 Nepøedlo3⁄4ení plné moci udìlené advokátovi a neodstranìní ní3⁄4e uvedených vad podání brání vìcnému projednání kasaèní stí3⁄4nosti.
 Nejvy11í správní soud proto kasaèní stí3⁄4nost stì3⁄4ovatelky odmítl (§ 37 odst. 5 a § 46 odst. 1 písm. a) za pou3⁄4ití § 120 s. ø. s.).
 Výrok o nákladech øízení se opírá o ustanovení § 60 odst. 3 za pou3⁄4ití ustanovení § 120 s. ø. s., podle nìho3⁄4 3⁄4ádný z úèastníkù nemá právo na náhradu nákladù øízení, byl-li návrh odmítnut.


type: legislation

text:
 26.4.2014
 DE
 Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union
 L 125/44
 BESCHLUSS DES RATES
 vom 14. April 2014
 über den Abschluss des Rahmenabkommens über umfassende Partnerschaft und Zusammenarbeit zwischen der Europäischen Gemeinschaft und ihren Mitgliedstaaten einerseits und der Republik Indonesien andererseits, mit Ausnahme der die Rückübernahme betreffenden Angelegenheiten
 (2014/230/EU)
 DER RAT DER EUROPÄISCHEN UNION —
 gestützt auf den Vertrag über die Arbeitsweise der Europäischen Union, insbesondere auf die Artikel 91, 100, 191 Absatz 4, 207 und 209 in Verbindung mit Artikel 218 Absatz 6 Buchstabe a,
 auf Vorschlag der Europäischen Kommission,
 nach Zustimmung des Europäischen Parlaments (1),
 in Erwägung nachstehender Gründe:
 (1)
 In Einklang mit dem Beschluss 2014/229/EU des Rates (2) wurde das Rahmenabkommen über umfassende Partnerschaft und Zusammenarbeit zwischen der Europäischen Gemeinschaft und ihren Mitgliedstaaten einerseits und der Republik Indonesien andererseits (im Folgenden „das Abkommen“) am 9. November 2009 vorbehaltlich seines Abschlusses zu einem späteren Zeitpunkt unterzeichnet.
 (2)
 Einige Bestimmungen des Abkommens betreffen die Rückübernahme und fallen deshalb in den Anwendungsbereich des Dritten Teils Titel V des Vertrags. Ein separater Beschluss (3) über diese in Artikel 34 Absatz 3 des Abkommens enthaltenen Bestimmungen wird parallel zum vorliegenden Beschluss erlassen.
 (3)
 Das Abkommen sollte im Namen der Union genehmigt werden —
 HAT FOLGENDEN BESCHLUSS ERLASSEN:
 Artikel 1
 Das Rahmenabkommen über umfassende Partnerschaft und Zusammenarbeit zwischen der Europäischen Gemeinschaft und ihren Mitgliedstaaten einerseits und der Republik Indonesien andererseits (4) wird mit Ausnahme von dessen Artikel 34 Absatz 3 im Namen der Europäischen Union genehmigt.
 Artikel 2
 Der Hohe Vertreter der Union für Außen- und Sicherheitspolitik führt den Vorsitz in dem in Artikel 41 des Abkommens vorgesehenen Gemischten Ausschuss. Die Union, bzw. gegebenenfalls die Union und die Mitgliedstaaten, werden abhängig vom jeweiligen Thema im Gemischten Ausschuss vertreten.
 Artikel 3
 Der Präsident des Rates nimmt im Namen der Union die Notifizierung nach Artikel 48 Absatz 1 des Abkommens vor (5).
 Artikel 4
 Dieser Beschluss tritt am Tag seiner Annahme in Kraft.
 Geschehen zu Luxemburg am 14. April 2014.
 Im Namen des Rates
 Die Präsidentin
 C. ASHTON
 (1) Zustimmung am 26. Februar 2014 erteilt (noch nicht im Amtsblatt veröffentlicht).
 (2) Beschluss 2014/229/EU des Rates vom 27. Oktober 2009 über die Unterzeichnung des Rahmenabkommens über umfassende Partnerschaft und Zusammenarbeit zwischen der Europäischen Gemeinschaft und ihren Mitgliedstaaten einerseits und der Republik Indonesien andererseits (siehe Seite 16 dieses Amtsblatts).
 (3) Beschluss 2014/231/EU des Rates vom 14. April 2014 über den Abschluss des Rahmenabkommens über umfassende Partnerschaft und Zusammenarbeit zwischen der Europäischen Gemeinschaft und ihren Mitgliedstaaten einerseits und der Republik Indonesien andererseits, hinsichtlich die Rückübernahme betreffende Angelegenheiten (siehe Seite 46 dieses Amtsblatts).
 (4) Der Wortlaut des Abkommens wurde gemeinsam mit dem Beschluss über seine Unterzeichnung im ABl. L 125 vom 26.4.2014, S. 17, veröffentlicht.
 (5) Der Tag des Inkrafttretens des Abkommens wird auf Veranlassung des Generalsekretariats des Rates im Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union veröffentlicht.


jurisdiction: US

text:
 I
 111th CONGRESS
 1st Session
 H. R. 3826
 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 October 15, 2009
 Mrs. Biggert (for
 herself and Mrs. Capps) introduced the
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in
 addition to the Committee on Ways and
 Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the
 Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the
 jurisdiction of the committee concerned
 A BILL
 To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to
 provide payments under the Medicare Program to licensed health care
 practitioners for unscheduled telephone consultation services in the case that
 such payments are determined to be cost and quality effective.
 1.Short titleThis Act may be cited as the
 Tele-Care Act of
 2009.
 2.Medicare payment
 for unscheduled physician telephone services
 (a)Coverage under
 part B
 (1)In
 generalSection 1861(s)(2) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C.
 1395x(s)(2)) is amended—
 (A)in subparagraph
 (DD), by striking and at the end;
 (B)in subparagraph
 (EE), by adding at the end and; and
 (C)by adding at the
 end the following new subparagraph:
 (FF)subject to section 2(c) of the
 Tele-Care Act of 2009,
 unscheduled telephone consultation services (as defined in subsection (hhh)(1))
 by a licensed health care practitioner, as defined by the Secretary (such as a
 physician, nurse practitioner, physician assistant, or nurse midwife), with
 respect to the furnishing of primary care services to an individual, if—
 (i)the Medicare number of the individual is
 associated with the national provider identifier of the licensed health care
 practitioner;
 (ii)to ensure the quality and appropriateness
 of such consultation services, the utilization of such services by the
 individual can be reviewed by a utilization and quality control peer review
 organization or eligible entity with which the Secretary has entered into a
 contract under part B of title XI or section 1893, respectively, by the
 organization or entity applying for purposes of the review under this
 subparagraph the processes and standards used by such organization or entity
 under such part or section, respectively, in the same manner that such
 processes and standards apply for purposes of carrying out utilization and
 quality review under such part or section, respectively;
 (iii)such consultation
 services are securely recorded by the Secretary (or an entity described in
 subsection (hhh)(1) with which the Secretary enters into a contract) for
 purposes of appropriate review by peers of the licensed health care
 practitioner who practice in the same medical specialty as the licensed health
 care practitioner and Medicare administrative contractor oversight of such
 services; and
 (iv)the licensed
 health care practitioner provides for the submission to the Secretary (or an
 entity described in subsection (hhh)(1) with which the Secretary enters into a
 contract) and the Secretary (or such an entity) records and maintains a summary
 of each such consultation service furnished by the licensed health care
 practitioner that includes—
 (I)the date and time
 (including duration) of the consultation service;
 (II)a unique medical
 record number specified by the Secretary (or such entity) to identify the
 consultation service;
 (III)the name of the
 individual;
 (IV)the name of the
 licensed health care practitioner; and
 (V)a summary of the
 content of the consultation
 service;
 .
 (2)Unscheduled
 telephone consultation services definedSection 1861 of such Act (42 U.S.C. 1395x)
 is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
 (hhh)Unscheduled telephone consultation
 services(1)The term
 unscheduled telephone consultation service means a consultation
 conducted by means of telephone or similar electronic communication device
 between a licensed health care practitioner described in subsection (s)(2)(FF)
 and an individual (or a representative of such individual), with respect to the
 furnishing of primary care services to such individual, that is not included as
 a scheduled physician service (as defined by the Secretary in regulations), and
 which is initiated by the individual (or representative) contacting a
 communication network operated by the Secretary (or an entity with which the
 Secretary enters into a contract) that connects the individual to the licensed
 health care practitioner, securely records the consultation for purposes of
 subsection (s)(2)(FF), and maintains the information described in clause (iv)
 of such subsection with respect to such consultation.
 (2)For purposes of applying the
 regulations promulgated pursuant to section 264(c) of the Health Insurance
 Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (Public Law 104–191; 110 Stat. 2033)
 with respect to an unscheduled telephone consultation service furnished by a
 licensed health care practitioner—
 (A)an entity with which the Secretary
 contracts under this subsection shall be treated as a health oversight agency;
 and
 (B)activities of such an entity described
 in subparagraph (A) in relation to such licensed health care practitioner and
 such unscheduled telephone consultation service are deemed to be health
 oversight
 activities.
 .
 (b)Payment under
 physician fee scheduleSection 1848(j)(3) of such Act (42 U.S.C.
 1395w–4(j)(3)) is amended by inserting (2)(FF), after
 (2)(EE),.
 (c)Contingent
 effective date, demonstration program
 (1)Contingent
 effective dateThe amendments made by this section shall become
 effective (if at all) in accordance with paragraph (2).
 (2)Demonstration
 program
 (A)In
 generalThe Secretary of
 Health and Human Services (in this paragraph referred to as the
 Secretary) shall establish a demonstration program to begin not
 later than 6 months after the date of the enactment of this Act to test the
 effectiveness of providing coverage under the Medicare program for unscheduled
 telephone consultation services (as defined in section 1861(hhh) of the Social
 Security Act, as added by subsection (a)(2)), by licensed health care
 practitioners to the extent provided under the amendments made by this section
 to a sample group of Medicare beneficiaries. For purposes of such demonstration
 program, the Secretary shall find that the provision of such coverage is
 effective if—
 (i)the
 coverage reduces costs to the Medicare program (such as through a reduction in
 admissions to the emergency departments of hospitals), whether or not such
 reduction is demonstrated in a reduction in the facility fees of hospital
 emergency departments, professional fees of emergency department licensed
 health care practitioners, laboratory fees, pathologist fees, hospital
 radiology department fees for technical components of x-rays, radiologist
 professional fees for interpreting x-rays, hospital respiratory department fees
 for respiratory treatments, hospital cardiology department fees for
 electrocardiograms, professional fees for interpreting such electrocardiograms,
 or any other cost specified by the Secretary; and
 (ii)the
 coverage results in patient health outcomes that are at least as favorable as
 would apply in the absence of such coverage (as determined in accordance with
 criteria established by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, in
 consultation with physician organizations).
 (B)Initial period
 of demonstration programThe demonstration program under
 subparagraph (A) shall be conducted for an initial period of 24 months.
 (C)Report to
 Congress
 (i)In
 generalNot later than 30 days after the last day of the initial
 period under subparagraph (B), the Secretary shall submit to Congress a report
 on the results of the demonstration program under this paragraph.
 (ii)Finding that
 payments are effectiveIf the
 Secretary finds, on the basis of the data derived from the demonstration
 program under subparagraph (A) and in accordance with such subparagraph, that
 providing coverage under the Medicare program for unscheduled telephone
 consultation services by licensed health care practitioners (to the extent
 provided under the amendments made by this section) is effective, the
 amendments made by this section shall become effective on the first day of the
 first month beginning after the date the report under clause (i) is submitted
 to Congress.
 (iii)Finding that
 payments are not effectiveIf
 the Secretary finds, on the basis of the data derived from the demonstration
 program under subparagraph (A) and in accordance with such subparagraph, that a
 finding of effectiveness (as described in clause (ii)) cannot be made, the
 demonstration program shall continue for a period of an additional 24 months.
 Not later than 30 days after the last day of such period, the Secretary shall
 submit to Congress a final report on the results of such program. The
 amendments made by this section shall become effective on the first day of the
 first month beginning after the date such report is submitted to Congress
 unless the report contains a finding by the Secretary, on the basis of such
 data and in accordance with such subparagraph, that providing coverage under
 the Medicare program for unscheduled telephone consultation services by
 licensed health care practitioners (to the extent provided under the amendments
 made by this section) is not effective, in which case the amendments made by
 this section shall not become effective.
 (d)ClarificationNothing
 in the provisions of this section or the amendments made by this section shall
 be construed as authorizing the creation of a national reporting system on
 licensed health care practitioner quality.


text:
 19.3.2009
 DE
 Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union
 L 73/57
 BESCHLUSS DES GEMEINSAMEN EWR-AUSSCHUSSES
 Nr. 18/2009
 vom 5. Februar 2009
 zur Änderung von Anhang XX (Umwelt) des EWR-Abkommens
 DER GEMEINSAME EWR-AUSSCHUSS —
 gestützt auf das Abkommen über den Europäischen Wirtschaftsraum, geändert durch das Anpassungsprotokoll zum Abkommen über den Europäischen Wirtschaftsraum, nachstehend „Abkommen“ genannt, insbesondere auf Artikel 98,
 in Erwägung nachstehender Gründe:
 (1)
 Anhang XX des Abkommens wurde durch den Beschluss des Gemeinsamen EWR-Ausschusses Nr. 122/2008 vom 7. November 2008 (1) geändert.
 (2)
 Die Richtlinie 2006/21/EG des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 15. März 2006 über die Bewirtschaftung von Abfällen aus der mineralgewinnenden Industrie und zur Änderung der Richtlinie 2004/35/EG (2) ist in das Abkommen aufzunehmen —
 BESCHLIESST:
 Artikel 1
 Anhang XX des Abkommens wird wie folgt geändert:
 1.
 Nach Nummer 32fd (Entscheidung 2006/329/EG der Kommission) wird folgende Nummer eingefügt:
 „32fe.
 32006 L 0021: Richtlinie 2006/21/EG des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 15. März 2006 über die Bewirtschaftung von Abfällen aus der mineralgewinnenden Industrie und zur Änderung der Richtlinie 2004/35/EG (ABl. L 102 vom 11.4.2006, S. 15).“
 2.
 Unter Nummer 1i (Richtlinie 2004/35/EG des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates) wird Folgendes angefügt:
 „, geändert durch:
 —
 32006 L 0021: Richtlinie 2006/21/EG des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 15. März 2006 (ABl. L 102 vom 11.4.2006, S. 15).“
 Artikel 2
 Der Wortlaut der Richtlinie 2006/21/EG in isländischer und norwegischer Sprache, der in der EWR-Beilage des Amtsblatts der Europäischen Union veröffentlicht wird, ist verbindlich.
 Artikel 3
 Dieser Beschluss tritt am 6. Februar 2009 in Kraft, sofern dem Gemeinsamen EWR-Ausschuss alle Mitteilungen nach Artikel 103 Absatz 1 des Abkommens vorliegen (3).
 Artikel 4
 Dieser Beschluss wird im EWR-Abschnitt und in der EWR-Beilage des Amtsblatts der Europäischen Union veröffentlicht.
 Geschehen zu Brüssel am 5. Februar 2009.
 Für den Gemeinsamen EWR-Ausschuss
 Der Vorsitzende
 Alan SEATTER
 (1) ABl. L 339 vom 18.12.2008, S. 114.
 (2) ABl. L 102 vom 11.4.2006, S. 15.
 (3) Das Bestehen verfassungsrechtlicher Anforderungen wurde mitgeteilt.


type: wikipedia

text:
Somalio vėliava įteisinta 1954 m. spalio 12 d. Ją sudaro žydros spalvos fonas bei jo centre esanti penkiakampė balta žvaigždė. Vėliava pradėta naudoti po nepriklausomybės atgavimo, kai Britų Somalilandas ir Italų Somalilandas susijungė į bendrą Somalio Respubliką. Vėliavą suprojektavo Mohammed Awale Liban.
 Istorija
 Kolonijiniu laikotarpiu dabartinę Somalio teritoriją kontroliavo dvi kolonijinės imperijos, Italija ir Didžioji Britanija, todėl atskiri jos regionai turėjo atitinkamas vėliavas. Britų kontroliuojamoje Somalilando dalyje buvo naudojama Britanijos kolonijoms bei priklausomoms teritorijoms būdinga vėliava, o Italijos kontroliuojamoje dalyje – tuometinės Italijos vėliava. Po pilietinio karo ir po jo sekusios suirutės, Somalis de facto tapo nebeegzistuojančia šalimi. Šaliai suskilus į keletą regionų (Somalilandas, Puntlandas), kiekvienas jų susikūrė po atskirą vėliavą. Kadangi nė viena pasaulio valstybė atskilusių regionų nepripažįsta, todėl ši vėliava išlieka oficialia Somalio Respublikos vėliava.
 Simbolika
 Somalis pasirinko žydros spalvos vėliavą, tuo imituodamas Jungtinių Tautų Organizacijos vėliavos spalvą, kuri nuo 1950 m. iki 1954 metų – kartu su Italijos pereinamąja administracija – kontroliavo Somalį, kai buvo paskelbta šios respublikos nepriklausomybė. Balta penkiakampė žvaigždė, esanti vėliavos centre, simbolizuoja penkias Somalio gyventojų grupes, gyvenančias Džibutyje, Ogadeno regione Etiopijoje, Šiaurės rytų provincijoje Kenijoje bei anksčiau Britų Somalilandui ir Italų Somalilandui priklaususiose teritorijose. Balta spalva simbolizuoja taiką šalyje bei jos klestėjimą.
 Valstybinės vėliavos
 Somalio atributika


type: caselaw

text:
 16.3.2015
 HU
 Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja
 C 89/4
 A Bundesgerichtshof (Németország) által 2014. december 17-én benyújtott előzetes döntéshozatal iránti kérelem – Patrick Breyer kontra Németországi Szövetségi Köztársaság
 (C-582/14. sz. ügy)
 (2015/C 089/05)
 Az eljárás nyelve: német
 A kérdést előterjesztő bíróság
 Bundesgerichtshof
 Az alapeljárás felei
 Felperes: Patrick Breyer
 Alperes: Németországi Szövetségi Köztársaság
 Az előzetes döntéshozatalra előterjesztett kérdések
 1)
 Úgy kell-e értelmezni a személyes adatok feldolgozása vonatkozásában az egyének védelméről és az ilyen adatok szabad áramlásáról szóló, 1995. október 24-i 95/46/EK európai parlamenti és tanácsi irányelv (1) – a továbbiakban: adatvédelmi irányelv – 2. cikkének a) pontját, hogy a szolgáltató által az internetes honlapjának felkeresésével összefüggésben tárolt internetprotokoll-cím (IP-cím) a szolgáltató számára már akkor is személyes adatot képez, ha valamely harmadik személy (a jelen ügyben: a hozzáférés-szolgáltató) rendelkezik az érintett azonosításához szükséges pluszinformációval?
 2)
 Ellentétes-e az adatvédelmi irányelv 7. cikkének f) pontjával az olyan nemzeti jogi rendelkezés, amely szerint a szolgáltató csak akkor gyűjtheti és használhatja fel a felhasználó személyes adatait annak beleegyezése nélkül, ha ez az elektronikus médium adott felhasználó általi konkrét igénybevételének lehetővé tételéhez és elszámolásához szükséges, és amely szerint az elektronikus médium általános működőképessége biztosításának célja nem indokolhatja a felhasználást a konkrét használat befejeztét követően?
 (1) HL L 281., 31. o.; magyar nyelvű különkiadás 13. fejezet, 15. kötet, 355. o.


text:
 Avis juridique important
 |
 11992M/PRO/SEBC/19
 Vertrag über die Europäische Union - Protokoll über die Satzung des europäischen Systems der Zentralbanken und der Europäischen Zentralbank - Kapitel IV: währungspolitische Aufgaben und Operationen des ESZB - Artikel 19: Mindestreserven
 Amtsblatt Nr. C 191 vom 29/07/1992 S. 0072
 Artikel 19 Mindestreserven 19.1. Vorbehaltlich des Artikels 2 kann die EZB zur Verwirklichung der geldpolitischen Ziele verlangen, daß die in den Mitgliedstaaten niedergelassenen Kreditinstitute Mindestreserven auf Konten bei der EZB und den nationalen Zentralbanken unterhalten. Verordnungen über die Berechnung und Bestimmung des Mindestreservesolls können vom EZB-Rat erlassen werden. Bei Nichteinhaltung kann die EZB Strafzinsen erheben und sonstige Sanktionen mit vergleichbarer Wirkung verhängen. 19.2. Zum Zwecke der Anwendung dieses Artikels legt der Rat nach dem Verfahren des Artikels 42 die Basis für die Mindestreserven und die höchstzulässigen Relationen zwischen diesen Mindestreserven und ihrer Basis sowie die angemessenen Sanktionen fest, die bei Nichteinhaltung anzuwenden sind.


text:
 115 HR 4714 IH: To award a Congressional Gold Medal to Don and Deyon Stephens, Founders of Mercy Ships, in recognition of nearly 40 years of service as the leaders of a humanitarian relief organization that exemplifies the compassionate character of America.
 U.S. House of Representatives
 2017-12-21
 text/xml
 EN
 Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.
 I115th CONGRESS1st SessionH. R. 4714IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVESDecember 21, 2017Mr. Gohmert (for himself, Mr. Brady of Texas, Ms. Eddie Bernice Johnson of Texas, Mr. Smith of Texas, Mr. Barton, Mr. Ratcliffe, Mr. Carter of Texas, Mr. Poe of Texas, Mr. Babin, Mr. Burgess, Mr. Weber of Texas, Mr. Marchant, Mr. Sessions, Mr. Farenthold, Mr. Arrington, Mr. Flores, Mr. Gene Green of Texas, Mr. Al Green of Texas, Mr. McCaul, Ms. Granger, Mr. Williams, Mr. Conaway, Mr. Olson, Mr. Hurd, Mr. Thornberry, Mr. Cuellar, Ms. Jackson Lee, Mr. Sam Johnson of Texas, and Mr. Culberson) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial ServicesA BILLTo award a Congressional Gold Medal to Don and Deyon Stephens, Founders of Mercy Ships, in
 recognition of nearly 40 years of service as the leaders of a humanitarian
 relief organization that exemplifies the compassionate character of
 America.
 1.FindingsThe Congress finds the following: (1)Mercy Ships was founded in 1978 and has worked in more than 70 countries, providing services valued at more than $1.3 billion, treating more than 2.56 million direct beneficiaries.
 (2)Mercy Ships owns and operates the world’s largest private hospital ship, the Africa Mercy that has five state-of-the-art operating rooms and ward bed space for 82 patients.
 (3)Mercy Ships vessels are staffed by professional volunteer crew including surgeons, nurses, doctors, dentists, cooks, engineers, agriculturalists, teachers, and others.
 (4)Mercy Ships has performed more than 82,000 life-changing or life-saving operations such as cleft lip and palate repair, cataract removal, orthopedic procedures, facial reconstruction, obstetric fistula repair, and tumor removal.
 (5)Mercy Ships has treated over 147,000 dental patients including over 390,000 dental procedures. (6)Mercy Ships has trained more than 5,900 local professionals (including surgeons) who have in turn trained many others.
 (7)Mercy Ships has trained over 38,100 local professionals in their area of expertise including anesthesiology, midwifery, sterilization, orthopedic and reconstructive surgery, and leadership, thereby increasing medical capacity in the host nation.
 (8)Mercy Ships has taught over 198,000 local people in basic health care. (9)Mercy Ships has completed over 1,100 infrastructure development projects focusing on water and sanitation education, agriculture and construction projects which improve local health care delivery systems.
 (10)Annually, Mercy Ships has over 1,600 volunteers who help in locations around the world, 900 of which serve in Africa. At any given time, there are more than 400 crew from 40 nations onboard the Africa Mercy.
 (11)The Africa Mercy alone has had over 4,900 crew from 74 countries serve onboard since its inception in 2007. In addition, more than 950 local Day Workers from 12 different countries have served alongside since it first docked in Africa.
 (12)Mercy Ships has served some of the world’s poorest populations and completed over 589 port visits in 55 developing nations and 18 developed nations for a total of 73 nations including: Australia, Bahamas, Benin, Belgium, Belize, Brazil, Canada, China, Congo Brazzaville, Columbia, Cuba, Denmark, Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Estonia, Faroe Islands, Fiji, France, Gabon, The Gambia, Germany, Ghana, Greece, Grenada, Guatemala, Guinea (West Africa), Guinea-Bissau, Guyana, Haiti, Honduras, Italy, Ivory Coast, Jamaica, Korea, Latvia, Liberia, Lithuania, Madagascar, Malta, Mexico, Montserrat, The Netherlands, New Caledonia, New Zealand, Nicaragua, Norway, Panama, Papua New Guinea, Philippines, Poland, Russia, Samoa, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Solomon Islands, South Africa, Spain, St. Eustatius (NL), St. Kitts, St. Thomas, St. Vincent, Sweden, Tahiti, Togo, Tonga, Trinidad, the United Kingdom, the United States, and Vanuatu.
 (13)Through the years, Mercy Ships has had four hospital ships that have served in some of the poorest ports in the world. Those include:
 (A)The 16,500-ton Africa Mercy is the world’s largest nongovernmental hospital ship and is dedicated to the continent of Africa.
 (B)The 522-foot Anastasis was the flag ship, and completed her first relief mission in 1982 to Guatemala. Her crew of 400 worked in Africa until she was decommissioned in 2007.
 (C)Acquired in 1994, the 265-foot Caribbean Mercy with her crew of 150 focused on the Caribbean basin and Central America with its Eye Surgery Unit. The ship was sold in 2006.
 (D)Donated in 1983, the 172-foot Good Samaritan served the Caribbean, Central and South America for 11 years with a crew of 60. Renamed the Island Mercy, she was redeployed to the South Pacific in 1994 and served there until sold in 2001.
 (E)Mercy Ships is currently building a new hospital ship to serve Africa’s most needy for the next 50 years with delivery expected in 2018. The new vessel, larger than the Africa Mercy, will assume the title of world’s largest private hospital ship with increased capacity building and a focus on healthcare training. It will also further the commitment of Mercy Ships to provide and promote through teaching, safe surgery globally as demonstrated by their membership in the G4 Alliance.
 (14)Mercy Ships has hosted Presidents and other heads of state from many nations around the world onboard their hospital ships who commended the free health care provided to their people.
 (15)Mercy Ships has been endorsed by President Nelson Mandela, President George Bush, Desmund Tutu, President Ellen Johnson Sirleaf, Sir John Major, President Dr. Ernest Bai Koroma, Tony Blair, President Jimmy Carter and First Lady Mary Flake de Flores.
 2.Congressional gold medal
 (a)Presentation authorizedThe Speaker of the House of Representatives and the President pro tempore of the Senate shall make appropriate arrangements for the presentation, on behalf of Congress, of a gold medal of appropriate design to Don and Deyon Stephens, Founders of Mercy Ships.
 (b)Design and strikingFor purposes of the presentation referred to in subsection (a), the Secretary of the Treasury (referred to in this Act as the Secretary) shall strike a gold medal with suitable emblems, devices, and inscriptions to be determined by the Secretary.
 3.Duplicate medalsThe Secretary may strike and sell duplicates in bronze of the gold medal struck pursuant to section 2 under such regulations as the Secretary may prescribe, at a price sufficient to cover the cost thereof, including labor, materials, dies, use of machinery, and overhead expenses, and the cost of the gold medal.
 4.Status of medals
 (a)National medalsThe medals struck pursuant to this Act are national medals for purposes of chapter 51 of title 31, United States Code.
 (b)Numismatic itemsFor purposes of sections 5134 and 5136 of title 31, United States Code, all medals struck under this Act shall be considered to be numismatic items.


text:
C 156/24 EL Επι ́σημη Εφημερι ́δα των Ευρωπαϊκω ́ν Κοινοτη ́των 29.6.2002
 ∆ΙΑΤΑΞΗ ΤΟΥ ΠΡΩΤΟ∆ΙΚΕΙΟΥ (εκπρο ́σωποι: A. Fierstra και J. van Bakel), κατα ́ Επιτροπη ́ς των
 Ευρωπαϊκω ́ν Κοινοτη ́των (εκπρο ́σωποι: R. Tricot και J. Stuyck), με
 της 10ης Ιανουαρι ́ου 2002 αντικει ́μενο την ακυ ́ρωση των αποφα ́σεων της Επιτροπη ́ς C(1999)
 2140 τελικο ́ (REC 8/98) και C(1999) 2143 τελικο ́ (REC 9/98),
 της 19ης Ιουλι ́ου 1999, με τις οποι ́ες διαπιστω ́νεται, αφενο ́ς, ο ́τι
 στην υπο ́θεση Τ-80/97 DEP, Starway SA κατα ́ Συμβουλι ́ου πρε ́πει να αναζητηθου ́ν a posteriori δασμοι ́ και, αφετε ́ρου, ο ́τι δεν
 της Ευρωπαϊκη ́ς Ενω ́ σεως (1) πρε ́πει να γι ́νει διαγραφη ́ δασμω ́ν ο ́σον αφορα ́ την εισαγωγη ́
 τηλεορα ́σεων προελευ ́σεως Τουρκι ́ας, το Πρωτοδικει ́ο (τρι ́το
 (Καθορισμο ́ς των δικαστικω ́ ν εξο ́δων) τμη ́μα), συγκει ́μενο απο ́ τους M. Jaeger, Προ ́εδρο, και K. Lenaerts
 και J. Azizi, δικαστε ́ς, γραμματε ́ας: H. Jung, εξε ́δωσε στις
 9 Απριλι ́ου 2002 δια ́ταξη με το ακο ́λουθο διατακτικο ́:
 (2002/C 156/45)
 (Γλω ́ σσα διαδικασι ́ας: η γαλλικη ́) 1) Καταργει ́ται η δι ́κη επι ́ της παρου ́σας προσφυγη ́ς.
 2) Η Επιτροπη ́ θα φε ́ρει το συ ́νολο των δικαστικω ́ ν εξο ́δων.
 Στην υπο ́θεση T-80/97 DEP, Starway SA, με ́εδρα το Luynes
 (Γαλλι ́α), εκπροσωπου ́μενη απο ́ τους δικηγο ́ρους J.-F. Bellis και
 P. De Baere, με το ́πο επιδο ́σεων στο Λουξεμβου ́ργο, κατα ́ (1) EE C 79 της 18.3.00.
 Συμβουλι ́ου της Ευρωπαϊκη ́ς Ενω ́σεως (εκπρο ́σωποι: A. Tanca
 και S. Marquardt), υποστηριζο ́μενου απο ́ την Επιτροπη ́ των
 Ευρωπαϊκω ́ν Κοινοτη ́των (εκπρο ́σωποι: V. Kreuschitz και
 S. Meany), με αντικει ́μενο αι ́τημα καθορισμου ́ των δικαστικω ́ν
 εξο ́δων που πρε ́πει να καταβληθου ́ν απο ́ το καθου ́ στην αιτου ́σα
 κατο ́πιν της αποφα ́σεως του Πρωτοδικει ́ου της 26ης Σεπτεμβρι ́ου
 2000, Τ-80/97, Starway κατα ́ Συμβουλι ́ου (Συλλογη ́ 2000, σ. II-
 3099), το Πρωτοδικει ́ο (τρι ́το πενταμελε ́ς τμη ́μα), συγκει ́μενο απο ́
 τους M. Jaeger, Προ ́εδρο, R. Garcı́a-Valdecasas, K. Lenaerts,
 P. Lindh, και J. Azizi, δικαστε ́ς, γραμματε ́ας: H. Jung, εξε ́δωσε ∆ΙΑΤΑΞΗ ΤΟΥ ΠΡΩΤΟ∆ΙΚΕΙΟΥ
 στις 10 Ιανουαρι ́ου 2002 δια ́ταξη με το ακο ́λουθο διατακτικο ́:
 της 14ης Ιανουαρι ́ου 2002
 Καθορι ́ζει το συ ́νολο των εξο ́δων που πρε ́πει να καταβληθου ́ν
 απο ́ το Συμβου ́λιο στην αιτου ́σα, στην υπο ́θεση Τ-80/97, στα
 58 031,87 ευρω ́. στην υπο ́θεση Τ-84/01, Association contre l’heure d’été
 (ACHE) κατα ́ Ευρωπαϊκου ́ Κοινοβουλι ́ου και Συμβουλι ́ου
 της Ευρωπαϊκη ́ς Ενω ́ σεως (1)
 (1) EE C 212 της 12.7.97.
 (Προσφυγη ́ ακυρω ́ σεως — Οδηγι ́α 2000/84/ΕΚ — Θερινη ́
 ́ ρα — Ενεργητικη
 ω ́ νομιμοποι ́ηση — 'Ενωση προσω ́ πων —
 Απαρα ́ δεκτο)
 ∆ΙΑΤΑΞΗ ΤΟΥ ΠΡΩΤΟ∆ΙΚΕΙΟΥ (2002/C 156/47)
 της 9ης Απριλι ́ου 2002 (Γλω
 ́ σσα διαδικασι ́ας: η γαλλικη ́)
 στην υπο ́θεση Τ-353/99, NV Calberson Belgium κατα ́
 Επιτροπη ́ς των Ευρωπαϊκω ́ ν Κοινοτη ́των (1)
 Στην υπο ́θεση Τ-84/01, Association contre l’heure d’été (ACHE),
 (Προσφυγη ́ ακυρω ́ σεως — Εισαγωγη ́ τηλεορα ́σεων προε-
 πρω ́ην Αssociation contre l’horaire d’été (ACHE), με ́εδρα το
 ́σεως Τουρκι ́ας — Κατα
 λευ ́ ργηση δι ́κης)
 Marly-le-Roy (Γαλλι ́α), εκπροσωπου ́μενη απο ́ τον C. Lepage,
 δικηγο ́ρο, κατα ́ Ευρωπαϊκου ́ Κοινοβουλι ́ου (εκπρο ́σωποι:
 (2002/C 156/46) C. Pennera και M. Goméz-Leal) και Συμβουλι ́ου της Ευρωπαϊκη ́ς
 Ενω ́σεως (εκπρο ́σωπος: A. Lopes Sabino), με αντικει ́μενο
 (Γλω ́ σσα διαδικασι ́ας: η ολλανδικη ́) προσφυγη ́ περι ́ακυρω ́σεως της οδηγι ́ας 2000/84/ΕΚ του Ευρωπαϊ-
 κου ́ Κοινοβουλι ́ου και του Συμβουλι ́ου, της 19ης Ιανουαρι ́ου
 2001, σχετικα ́ με τις διατα ́ξεις για τη θερινη ́ ω ́ρα (ΕΕ L 31,
 σ. 21), το Πρωτοδικει ́ο (δευ ́τερο τμη ́μα), συγκει ́μενο απο ́ τους
 Στην υπο ́θεση Τ-353/99, εταιρι ́α ΝV Calberson Belgium, εκπρο- R. M. Moura Ramos, Προ ́εδρο, J. Pirrung και Α. W. H. Meij,
 σωπου ́μενη απο ́ τον δικηγο ́ρο L. Gheysen, με το ́πο επιδο ́σεων στο δικαστε ́ς, γραμματε ́ας: H. Jung, εξε ́δωσε στις 14 Ιανουαρι ́ου 2002
 Λουξεμβου ́ργο, υποστηριζο ́μενη απο ́ το Βασι ́λειο των Κα ́τω Χωρω ́ν δια ́ταξη με το ακο ́λουθο διατακτικο ́:


text:
127/2005 Z. z. Zákon, ktorým sa mení a dopĺňa zákon č. 460/2002 Z. z. o vykonávaní medzinárodných sankcií zabezpeču... | Aktuálne znenie
 127/2005 Z. z.
 Zákon č. 127/2005 Z. z.Zákon, ktorým sa mení a dopĺňa zákon č. 460/2002 Z. z. o vykonávaní medzinárodných sankcií zabezpečujúcich medzinárodný mier a bezpečnosť
 Čiastka 58/2005
 Platnosť od 14.04.2005 do30.04.2011
 Účinnosť od 01.05.2005 do30.04.2011
 Zrušený 126/2011 Z. z.
 Aktuálne znenie 01.05.2005 - 30.04.2011
 ktorým sa mení a dopĺňa zákon č. 460/2002 Z. z. o vykonávaní medzinárodných sankcií zabezpečujúcich medzinárodný mier a bezpečnosť
 Zákon č. 460/2002 Z. z. o vykonávaní medzinárodných sankcií zabezpečujúcich medzinárodný mier a bezpečnosť sa mení a dopĺňa takto:
 1. V § 1 sa za slovo „vykonávanie“ vkladá slovo „niektorých“.
 2. § 2 a 3 znejú:
 a) medzinárodnou sankciou súhrn obmedzení, príkazov alebo zákazov zavedených na účel zachovania alebo obnovenia medzinárodného mieru a bezpečnosti, ktoré vyplývajú
 1. z rozhodnutia Bezpečnostnej rady Organizácie Spojených národov, prijatých podľa čl. 41 Charty Organizácie Spojených národov (ďalej len „rozhodnutie") alebo
 2. z jednotných akcií Rady Európskej únie (ďalej len „Rada") podľa čl. 14 Zmluvy o Európskej únii (ďalej len „jednotná akcia") a spoločných pozícií Rady podľa čl. 15 Zmluvy o Európskej únii (ďalej len „spoločná pozícia"), alebo
 3. z naliehavého opatrenia podľa čl. 60 a 301 Zmluvy o založení Európskeho spoločenstva (ďalej len „naliehavé opatrenie"),
 b) sankcionovaným územím v rozhodnutí, v spoločnej pozícii, v jednotnej akcii alebo v naliehavom opatrení určené územie vrátane vzdušného priestoru a pobrežných vôd,
 c) sankcionovanou osobou osoba, ktorá je určená v rozhodnutí, v jednotnej akcii, v spoločnej pozícii alebo v naliehavom opatrení
 1. fyzická osoba žijúca na sankcionovanom území,
 2. iná fyzická osoba alebo iná organizovaná moc a jej predstavitelia obvykle sa zdržujúca na sankcionovanom území s výnimkou občanov Slovenskej republiky,
 3. právnická osoba so sídlom na sankcionovanom území,
 d) slovenskou osobou
 3. iná fyzická osoba zdržujúca sa na území Slovenskej republiky podľa osobitného zákona,1)
 4. právnická osoba2) so sídlom na území Slovenskej republiky,
 e) tovarom každá hnuteľná vec vrátane surovín a elektrickej energie, výrobky alebo služby s výnimkou predmetov kultúrnej hodnoty bez ohľadu na ich odplatné alebo bezodplatné poskytnutie,
 f) sankcionovaným tovarom v rozhodnutí, v jednotnej akcii alebo v naliehavom opatrení určený tovar, ktorý vlastní alebo drží sankcionovaná osoba,
 g) slovenským tovarom tovar, ktorý vlastní alebo drží slovenská osoba,
 h) iným tovarom tovar, ktorý nie je slovenským tovarom ani sankcionovaným tovarom,
 i) dopravným prostriedkom zariadenie, ktoré je spôsobilé prepravovať najmä osoby, batožinu, tovar podľa písmena e) alebo poštové zásielky,
 j) dopravným prostriedkom sankcionovanej osoby aj dopravný prostriedok imatrikulovaný, vlastnený, držaný alebo používaný sankcionovanou osobou alebo v jej prospech,
 k) slovenským dopravným prostriedkom aj dopravný prostriedok imatrikulovaný, vlastnený, držaný alebo používaný slovenskou osobou alebo v jej prospech,
 l) iným dopravným prostriedkom dopravný prostriedok, ktorý nie je slovenským dopravným prostriedkom ani dopravným prostriedkom sankcionovanej osoby,
 m) predmetom kultúrnej hodnoty
 1. umelecké dielo a predmety múzejnej hodnoty a galerijnej hodnoty,4)
 2. národná kultúrna pamiatka5) a jej súbory,
 3. historické knižničné dokumenty a historické knižničné fondy,6)
 4. evidovaný majetok cirkví a náboženských spoločností,7)
 5. archívne dokumenty.8)
 (1) Vláda Slovenskej republiky vyhlási nariadením vlády
 a) rozhodnutie, ak ho Rada nepreberie spoločnou pozíciou alebo jednotnou akciou,
 b) medzinárodnú sankciu, ktorá je namierená proti občanom členských štátov Európskej únie alebo právnickým osobám, ktoré majú sídlo na území členského štátu Európskej únie,
 c) spoločnú pozíciu alebo jednotnú akciu, ktoré Rada nevykoná naliehavým opatrením.
 (2) Každý je povinný dodržiavať medzinárodné sankcie vyhlásené vládou Slovenskej republiky podľa tohto zákona.
 (3) Ak Bezpečnostná rada Organizácie Spojených národov alebo Rada rozhodnutia o medzinárodných sankciách podľa § 2 písm. a) zruší, vláda Slovenskej republiky zruší nariadenia vlády, ktorými sa rozhodnutia o medzinárodných sankciách podľa § 2 písm. a) na území Slovenskej republiky vyhlásili.“.
 3. Poznámka pod čiarou k odkazu 3 sa vypúšťa.
 4. Poznámka pod čiarou k odkazu 8 znie:
 „8) Zákon č. 395/2002 Z. z. o archívoch a registratúrach a o doplnení niektorých zákonov v znení zákona č. 515/2003 Z. z.“.
 5. V § 9 písm. b) sa slová „záväznou rezolúciou alebo spoločnou pozíciou príslušných medzinárodných orgánov (§ 2 ods. 1)“ nahrádzajú slovami „rozhodnutím, spoločnou pozíciou, jednotnou akciou a naliehavým opatrením“.
 6. V § 10 odseky 1 a 2 znejú:
 „(1) Za porušenie medzinárodnej sankcie alebo za porušenie sankcie vyhlásenej nariadením vlády vydaným podľa § 3 uloží orgán príslušný podľa odseku 7 právnickej osobe alebo fyzickej osobe-podnikateľovi
 a) pokutu od 100 000 do 10 000 000 Sk,
 b) prepadnutie veci.
 (2) Autorovi,18) majiteľovi patentu18a) alebo inej fyzickej osobe, ktorej práva k predmetu duševného vlastníctva sú chránené osobitným predpisom, možno uložiť pokutu od 100 000 Sk do 500 000 Sk, ak tieto práva prevedie na inú osobu alebo dá súhlas na ich využitie alebo použitie v rozpore s medzinárodnou sankciou alebo nariadením vlády.“.
 7. V poznámke pod čiarou k odkazu 18 sa citácia „§ 2 zákona č. 513/1991 Zb. Obchodný zákonník v znení neskorších predpisov.“ nahrádza citáciou „§ 6 zákona č. 618/2003 Z. z. o autorskom práve a právach súvisiacich s autorským právom (autorský zákon).“.
 8. Poznámka pod čiarou k odkazu 18a znie:
 „18a) Zákon č. 435/2001 Z. z. o patentoch, dodatkových ochranných osvedčeniach a o zmene a doplnení niektorých zákonov (patentový zákon) v znení zákona č. 402/2002 Z. z.
 Zákon č. 444/2002 Z. z. o dizajnoch.
 Zákon č. 55/1997 Z. z. o ochranných známkach v znení neskorších predpisov.“.
 9. § 11 sa vypúšťa.
 10. Za § 12 sa vkladá § 12a, ktorý znie:
 Zrušuje sa nariadenie vlády Slovenskej republiky č. 707/2002 Z. z., ktorým sa vyhlasujú medzinárodné sankcie zabezpečujúce medzinárodný mier a bezpečnosť v znení nariadenia vlády Slovenskej republiky č. 185/2003 Z. z., nariadenia vlády Slovenskej republiky č. 240/2003 Z. z., nariadenia vlády Slovenskej republiky č. 447/2003 Z. z. a nariadenia vlády Slovenskej republiky č. 137/2004 Z. z.“.


text:
1.339 volte
 Il Tar Veneto con la Sentenza 11 marzo 2020, n. 247 si pronuncia sulla mancata iscrizione al Casellario delle società di ingegneria tenuto dall’Anac precisando che “come evidenziato anche nello stesso sito dell’ANAC (pagina delle FAQ relative a tale servizio), la mancata iscrizione rileva solo come inadempimento a un obbligo di comunicazione e non ha alcun effetto costitutivo della legittimazione a partecipare alle gare”.
 Illegittimità dell'aggiudicazione
 Il problema nasce dal fatto che la società seconda classificata aveva impugnato l’aggiudicazione e gli altri atti lamentandone l’illegittimità per alcuni motivi tra i quali quello ella violazione e falsa applicazione dell’art. 81 del D.Lgs. n. 50/2016. Violazione e falsa applicazione del D.M. n. 263/2016.Violazione e falsa applicazione dell’art. 46 del D.Lgs. n. 50/2016. Eccesso di potere per difetto del presupposto. Eccesso di potere per inadeguata istruttoria. Con tale motivo, parte ricorrente evidenzia che una società mandante non è iscritta al Casellario delle società di ingegneria tenuto dall’Anac e sostiene che ciò avrebbe dovuto comportare l’esclusione dalla gara della società e con essa del raggruppamento di cui fa parte per aver violato l’art. 6 del D.M. 163/2006 relativo agli “Obblighi di comunicazione” a carico dell’operatore. Parte ricorrente deduce, infatti, che la disciplina di settore, con specifico riferimento ai servizi di ingegneria, ha previsto che sia onere dei concorrenti fornire alle Stazioni Appaltanti, per il tramite del Casellario, le informazioni necessarie per verificare il possesso dei requisiti di ordine generale e di carattere tecnico-professionale, economico e finanziario per la partecipazione, e se quest’onere non viene soddisfatto la Stazione Appaltante non sarebbe messa in grado di svolgere le proprie funzioni di verifica del possesso dei requisiti dichiarati, secondo quanto disposto dall’art. 81 del codice dei contratti pubblici; per cui il concorrente non iscritto al Casellario dovrebbe essere escluso dalla gara.
 Mancata iscrizione nel Casellario
 La mancanza di iscrizione nel Casellario non consentirebbe di verificare: se la concorrente soddisfa le condizioni previste dall’art. 2 del decreto (su direzione tecnica, organigramma e requisiti di qualità, riparto delle competenze tra le strutture dedicate al servizio, tenuto conto che la società svolge anche attività diverse dalle prestazioni di servizi di cui all'articolo 46 del codice); di comprendere chi sia a rivestire il ruolo di direttore tecnico e se abbia le competenze; se i soggetti indicati nel gruppo di lavoro rivestano il ruolo di “dipendente o un consulente su base annua che abbia fatturato nei confronti della società una quota superiore al cinquanta per cento del proprio fatturato annuo risultante dall'ultima dichiarazione IVA”, ruolo indefettibile per poter essere inseriti nello staff dei progettisti individuati dal raggruppamento, per cui parte ricorrente contesta il possesso di tali requisiti.
 In allegato la sentenza del Tar Veneto 11/03/2020, n. 247.
 Sentenza 11/03/2020, n. 247


text:
Nr. L 185/ 16 De Europæiske Fællesskabers Tidende 16 . 7 . 75
 AFTALE
 mellem Det europæiske økonomiske Fællesskab og republikken Rwanda om
 levering af mel af blød hvede som fødevarehjælp
 RÅDET FOR DE EUROPÆISKE FÆLLESSKABER
 på den ene side,
 REGERINGEN FOR REPUBLIKKEN RWANDA
 på den anden side,
 HAR VEDTAGET at indgå denne aftale og har med henblik herpå som befuldmægtigede udpeget :
 RÅDET FOR DE EUROPÆISKE FÆLLESSKABER :
 REGERINGEN FOR REPUBLIKKEN RWANDA :
 SOM ER BLEVET ENIGE OM FØLGENDE BESTEMMELSER :
 Artikel I Artikel V
 Det europæiske økonomiske Fællesskab, herefter be Bestemmelseslandet forpligter sig til at anvende den
 nævnt » Fællesskabet«, leverer som gave til republikken som fødevarehjælp modtagne vare til konsum og at
 Rwanda, herefter benævnt »bestemmelseslandet«, uddele den gratis til de nødlidende befolkningsgrup
 3 000 tons blød hvede, hvoraf 1 500 tons afskrives på per.
 Fællesskabets fødevarehjælpeprogram for 1970/ 1971
 og 1 500 tons afskrives på programmet for 1973/ 1974, Artikel VI
 i form af 1 986 tons mel af blød hvede .
 De kontraherende parter forpligter sig til at gennem
 føre denne aftale, således at den nationale produktions
 A rtikel II og den internationale handels normale struktur ikke
 berøres. Med henblik herpå træffer de de nødvendige
 foranstaltninger for at sikre, at leverancerne i form af
 Leverancerne foretages i nye bomuldssække med et
 fødevarehjælp ikke erstatter, men supplerer de handels
 indhold hver på 50 kg, halvdelen franco Kigali og
 transaktioner, der med rimelighed kunne forventes i
 halvdelen franco Ruhengeri .
 mangel af sådanne leverancer.
 Artikel III Artikel VII
 Bestemmelseslandet træffer alle hensigtsmæssige foran
 Fællesskabets og bestemmelseslandets forpligtelser og staltninger for at forhindre :
 ansvar vedrørende leveringen og overtagelsen fastsæt
 tes i bilaget, som udgør en integrerende del af denne — genudførsel såvel af den vare, der er modtaget som
 aftale . fødevarehjælp, som af produkter, der er fremstillet
 af denne leverance ;
 — handelsmæssig og ikke-handelsmæssig udførsel
 Artikel IV inden for 6 måneder efter den seneste levering så
 vel af den lokalt fremstillede vare, som måtte være
 Bestemmelseslandet forpligter sig til at træffe alle nød af samme art som det, der er modtaget som fødeva
 vendige foranstaltninger med henblik på transport og rehjælp, som af de produkter, der er fremstillet
 forsikring af varen fra bestemmelsesstederne . deraf.
 ---pagebreak--- 16 . 7 . 75 De Europæiske Fællesskabers Tidende Nr. L 185/ 17
 Artikel VIII følge transaktionerne i forbindelse med gennemførel
 sen af aftalen .
 Bestemmelseslandet forpligter sig til at give Fællesska
 bet meddelelse om gennemførelsesbetingelserne for
 denne aftale. I dette øjemed giver det hver tredje må Artikel X
 ned indtil de som hjælp modtagne varer er fuldstæn
 dig opbrugt Kommissionen for De europæiske Fælles På begæring af en af de kontraherende parter rådfører
 skaber meddelelse om distribuerede mængder, modta disse sig med hinanden om alle spørgsmål vedrørende
 anvendelsen af denne aftale .
 gernes art og antal, distributionssteder, og -form .
 Artikel IX Artikel XI
 Bestemmelseslandet træffer alle hensigtsmæssige foran Denne aftale er affattet i to eksemplarer på dansk, en
 staltninger for at gøre det muligt for de af Fællesska gelsk, fransk, italiensk, nederlandsk og tysk, og hver af
 bet behørigt befuldmægtigede personer på stedet at disse tekster har samme gyldighed.
 ---pagebreak--- Nr. L 185/ 18 De Europæiske Fællesskabers Tidende 16. 7. 75
 BILAG
 Nærmere bestemmelser om levering og overtagelse
 Artikel 1 sende tid før dette tidspunkt. Fællesskabet skal mindst to
 dage i forvejen bekræfte dette tidspunkt.
 Levering har fundet sted, og risikoen overgår fra Fællesskabet
 til bestemmelseslandet, i det øjeblik varen faktisk er ankom Artikel 4
 met til og losset på bestemmelsesstedet.
 Ved levering af varen er en tolerance på 5 % under den vare
 Bestemmelseslandet bærer alle omkostninger ved modtagel mængde, som skal leveres ifølge artikel I i aftalen , tilladt.
 sen af varen , omkostninger ved eventuel omladning og andre
 omkostninger efter leveringen.
 Artikel 5
 Eventuelle omkostninger, der er opstået ved forsinkelser i
 overtagelsen af varen, og som henhører under bestemmelses Fællesskabet udpeger til gennemførelsen af bestemmelserne i
 landet, skal bæres af dette . dette bilag en befuldmægtiget, hvis navn og adresse det retti
 digt meddeler bestemmelseslandet.
 Artikel 2 Bestemmelseslandet udpeger på hvert leveringssted en lad
 ningsmodtager, hvis navn og adresse det forud for aftalens
 Fællesskabet giver så hurtigt som muligt bestemmelseslandet gennemførelse meddeler Fællesskabet.
 meddelelse om det eller de transportmidler, der er benyttet
 ved varens, transport til bestemmelsesstedet, forsendelsesmå A rtikel 6
 den for de mellemliggende faser, datoen for indladningen så
 vel som varens art og mængde, som konstateret ved afsendel Ved varens levering udsteder bestemmelseslandet til Det euro
 sen fra Fællesskabet. pæiske økonomiske Fællesskabs befuldmægtigede et overta
 gelsescertifikat med angivelse af tid og sted for overtagelsen,
 Artikel 3 den overtagne vares art og mængde samt eventuelle bemærk
 ninger vedrørende varens kvalitet. Det fremsender en kopi af
 Fællesskabet meddeler bestemmelseslandet det formodede dette certifikat til Kommissionen for De europæiske Fælles
 tidspunkt for varens ankomst til bestemmelsesstedet i pas skaber .
 Meddelelse vedrørende undertegnelse af aftalen om levering af fødevarehjælp
 mellem Det europæiske økonomiske Fællesskab og republikken Rwanda
 Aftalen mellem Det europæiske økonomiske Fællesskab og republikken Rwanda om leve
 ring af mel af blød hvede som fødevarehjælp, som Rådet har besluttet af indgå den 16.
 juni 1975, er blevet undertegnet i Bruxelles den 18 . juni 1975,
 for Rådet for De europæiske Fællesskaber af hr. Brendan Dillon , overordentlig og befuld
 mægtiget ambassadør, Irlands faste repræsentant, formand for De faste repræsentanters
 Komité, samt Hans-Broder Krohn, generaldirektør for generaldirektoratet for udvikling
 og samarbejde i Kommissionen for De europæiske Fællesskaber,
 for regeringen for republikken Rwanda af hr. Ignace Karuhije, overordentlig og befuld
 mægtiget ambassadør, republikken Rwanda's repræsentant ved Det europæiske økonomi
 ske Fællesskab .


text:
 24.6.2020
 PL
 Dziennik Urzędowy Unii Europejskiej
 L 200/1
 ROZPORZĄDZENIE WYKONAWCZE KOMISJI (UE) 2020/863
 z dnia 22 czerwca 2020 r.
 w sprawie sprostowania niemieckiej wersji językowej rozporządzenia wykonawczego (UE) nr 404/2011 ustanawiającego szczegółowe przepisy wykonawcze do rozporządzenia Rady (WE) nr 1224/2009 ustanawiającego wspólnotowy system kontroli w celu zapewnienia przestrzegania przepisów wspólnej polityki rybołówstwa
 KOMISJA EUROPEJSKA,
 uwzględniając Traktat o funkcjonowaniu Unii Europejskiej,
 uwzględniając rozporządzenie Rady (WE) nr 1224/2009 z dnia 20 listopada 2009 r. ustanawiające unijny system kontroli w celu zapewnienia przestrzegania przepisów wspólnej polityki rybołówstwa, zmieniające rozporządzenia (WE) nr 847/96, (WE) nr 2371/2002, (WE) nr 811/2004, (WE) nr 768/2005, (WE) nr 2115/2005, (WE) nr 2166/2005, (WE) nr 388/2006, (WE) nr 509/2007, (WE) nr 676/2007, (WE) nr 1098/2007, (WE) nr 1300/2008, (WE) nr 1342/2008 i uchylające rozporządzenia (EWG) nr 2847/93, (WE) nr 1627/94 oraz (WE) nr 1966/2006 (1), w szczególności jego art. 92 ust. 5,
 a także mając na uwadze, co następuje:
 (1)
 Niemiecka wersja językowa rozporządzenia wykonawczego Komisji (UE) nr 404/2011 (2) zawiera błąd w wierszu nr 5 tabeli w załączniku XXX w odniesieniu do poważnych naruszeń w związku z niewypełnianiem obowiązku wyładunku ryb niewymiarowych.
 (2)
 Należy zatem odpowiednio sprostować niemiecką wersję językową rozporządzenia wykonawczego (UE) nr 404/2011. Sprostowanie nie ma wpływu na pozostałe wersje językowe.
 (3)
 Środki przewidziane w niniejszym rozporządzeniu są zgodne z opinią Komitetu ds. Rybołówstwa i Akwakultury,
 PRZYJMUJE NINIEJSZE ROZPORZĄDZENIE:
 Artykuł 1
 (nie dotyczy wersji polskiej)
 Artykuł 2
 Niniejsze rozporządzenie wchodzi w życie dwudziestego dnia po jego opublikowaniu w Dzienniku Urzędowym Unii Europejskiej.
 Niniejsze rozporządzenie wiąże w całości i jest bezpośrednio stosowane we wszystkich państwach członkowskich.
 Sporządzono w Brukseli dnia 22 czerwca 2020 r.
 W imieniu Komisji
 Ursula VON DER LEYEN
 Przewodnicząca
 (1) Dz.U. L 343 z 22.12.2009, s. 1.
 (2) Rozporządzenie wykonawcze Komisji (UE) nr 404/2011 z dnia 8 kwietnia 2011 r. ustanawiające szczegółowe przepisy wykonawcze do rozporządzenia Rady (WE) nr 1224/2009 ustanawiającego wspólnotowy system kontroli w celu zapewnienia przestrzegania przepisów wspólnej polityki rybołówstwa (Dz.U. L 112 z 30.4.2011, s. 1).