type: legislation

text:
 Důležité právní upozornění
 |
 52010PC0071
 Návrh nařízení Evropského Parlamentu a rady, kterým se mění nařízení rady (ES, Euratom) č. 1605/2002, kterým se stanoví finanční nařízení o souhrnném rozpočtu Evropských společenství /* KOM/2010/0071 konecném znení - COD 2010/0047 */
 [pic] | EVROPSKÁ KOMISE |V Bruselu dne 3.3.2010KOM(2010) 71 v konečném znění2010/0047 (COD)NávrhNAŘÍZENÍ EVROPSKÉHO PARLAMENTU A RADY,kterým se mění nařízení Rady (ES, EURATOM) č. 1605/2002, kterým se stanoví finanční nařízení o souhrnném rozpočtu Evropských společenstvíDŮVODOVÁ ZPRÁVATento návrh Komise je předkládán za účelem změny finančního nařízení tak, aby bylo uvedeno do souladu s Lisabonskou smlouvou po jejím vstupu v platnost dne 1. prosince 2009. Lisabonská smlouva zavádí důležité změny, které se týkají rozpočtových a finančních otázek a které by měly být ve finančním nařízení zohledněny. Finanční nařízení stanoví pravidla a postupy, které se vztahují na využívání finančních prostředků EU a které musí dodržovat všechny orgány.Koncem prvního pololetí roku 2010 předloží Komise svůj návrh na přezkum finančního nařízení, které podle článku 184 finančního nařízení probíhá každé tři roky. Komise se nicméně domnívá, že je nevyhnutelné provést i tuto aktuální, urychlenou revizi finančního nařízení a jeho prováděcích pravidel ještě před tímto tříletým přezkumem a nezávisle na něm. Tato revize omezeného rozsahu je nutná k zajištění stabilního právního rámce pro plnění rozpočtu v souladu s novou smlouvou. Další aspekty, které se vztahují k vytvoření Evropské služby pro vnější činnost (EEAS), budou předmětem samostatného návrhu, který Komise předloží v dohledné době.Změny vyplývající z Lisabonské smlouvyPoprvé za několik desetiletí dochází k tomu, že Smlouva o fungování Evropské unie (SFEU) stanoví důležité změny týkající se rozpočtových a finančních otázek, které je třeba do finančního nařízení zahrnout. Měla by být proto třeba zavedena či upravena příslušná ustanovení finančního nařízení, aby byly zohledněny tyto změny:– víceletý finanční rámec zavedený ve Smlouvě a jeho propojení s ročním rozpočtovým procesem: v důsledku zavedení víceletého finančního rámce ve SFEU by v tomto ohledu měla být do finančního nařízení začleněna některá ustanovení z interinstitucionální dohody o rozpočtové kázni a řádném finančním řízení;– nový roční rozpočtový proces a upuštění od rozlišování mezi povinnými a nepovinnými výdaji s dopadem na ustanovení, která se týkají převodů a prozatímních dvanáctin.Předkládaný návrh rovněž umožňuje, aby bylo finanční nařízení uvedeno v soulad s Lisabonskou smlouvou jak prostřednictvím technických úprav, tak zrušením zastaralých ustanovení.Nová ustanovení zavedená článkem 317 SFEU, která se týkají povinnosti členských států v oblasti kontroly a auditu při plnění rozpočtu, společně s bodem 44 interinstitucionální dohody o rozpočtové kázni a řádném finančním řízení vyžadují hloubkovou analýzu, a budou proto navrženy až při tříleté revizi finančního nařízení. Tříletá revize by měla být rovněž příležitostí ke kodifikaci nařízení nebo k jeho přepracování, aby bylo zohledněno zejména přečíslování jednotlivých ustanovení Smlouvy.2010/0047 (COD)NávrhNAŘÍZENÍ EVROPSKÉHO PARLAMENTU A RADY,kterým se mění nařízení Rady (ES, EURATOM) č. 1605/2002, kterým se stanoví finanční nařízení o souhrnném rozpočtu Evropských společenstvíEVROPSKÝ PARLAMENT A RADA EVROPSKÉ UNIE,s ohledem na Smlouvu o fungování Evropské unie, a zejména na článek 322 této smlouvy, ve spojení se Smlouvou o založení Evropského společenství pro atomovou energii, a zejména s článkem 106a této smlouvy,s ohledem na návrh Evropské komise,s ohledem na stanovisko Účetního dvora[1],v souladu s řádným legislativním postupem,vzhledem k těmto důvodům:1. Nařízení Rady (ES, EURATOM) č. 1605/2002 ze dne 25. června 2002, kterým se stanoví finanční nařízení o souhrnném rozpočtu Evropských společenství[2] (dále jen „finanční nařízení“), stanoví rozpočtové zásady a finanční předpisy, které by měly být dodržovány ve všech legislativních aktech. Některá ustanovení finančního nařízení je nutné změnit, aby byly zohledněny změny zavedené Lisabonskou smlouvou.2. Evropská centrální banka by vzhledem ke své zvláštní povaze a úkolům, zejména pokud jde o její nezávislost týkající se správy vlastních financí, měla být z působnosti finančního nařízení vyňata. Z důvodů právní jistoty by toto vynětí mělo být použitelné ode dne vstupu Lisabonské smlouvy v platnost.3. Policejní a justiční spolupráce v trestních věcech se stala nedílnou součástí jiných politik a vnitřních činností Unie. Zvláštní finanční ustanovení použitelná na tuto politiku nejsou již proto opodstatněná a měla by být zrušena.4. Podle víceletého finančního rámce na období 2007–2013 nepodléhá již Záruční fond pro vnější vztahy zvláštnímu režimu. Platby do fondu ze souhrnného rozpočtu Evropské unie se nyní zapisují do rozpočtové linie, která je k tomu určena. Zvláštní finanční ustanovení použitelná na fond již nejsou zapotřebí, a měla by být proto zrušena.5. Měla by být objasněna pravidla, která se uplatní v situaci, kdy Evropský parlament rozhodne o snížení částky na dodatečné výdaje překračující prozatímní dvanáctiny, kterou schválila Rada v souladu s článkem 315 Smlouvy.6. Víceletý finanční rámec na období 2007–2013 byl ustanoven Interinstitucionální dohodou ze dne 17. května 2006 mezi Evropským parlamentem, Radou a Komisí o rozpočtové kázni a řádném finančním řízení[3]. Jelikož Smlouva vyžaduje, aby byl víceletý finanční rámec stanoven formou nařízení, je nutné do finančního nařízení začlenit některá ustanovení z této interinstitucionální dohody. K zajištění rozpočtové kázně je zejména nutné propojit víceletý finanční rámec s ročním rozpočtovým procesem. Je rovněž nezbytné zahrnout ustanovení týkající se povinnosti Evropského parlamentu a Rady dodržovat příděly prostředků na závazky stanovené základními právními akty pro strukturální opatření, rozvoj venkova a Evropský rybářský fond.7. Již se nerozlišuje mezi povinnými a nepovinnými výdaji. Je proto třeba náležitě upravit ustanovení týkající se převodů.8. V souladu s článkem 316 Smlouvy by mělo být stanoveno, aby Evropská rada a Rada sdílely stejný oddíl rozpočtu.9. Ve finančním nařízení by měla být zohledněna změna ročního rozpočtového procesu stanovená ve Smlouvě.10. V oblasti vnějších činností by měl být v souladu s ustanoveními Smlouvy upraven postup pro přijímání přípravných opatření.11. Komise musí Evropskému parlamentu a Radě předkládat hodnotící zprávu o financích Unie založenou na dosažených výsledcích. Do finančního nařízení by proto měla být začleněna ustanovení týkající se této zprávy ve vztahu k ostatním stávajícím požadavkům na podávání zpráv.12. Nařízení (ES, EURATOM) č. 1605/2002 by proto mělo být odpovídajícím způsobem změněno,PŘIJALY TOTO NAŘÍZENÍ:Článek 1Nařízení (ES, EURATOM) č. 1605/2002 se mění takto:13. V názvu nařízení se slova „o souhrnném rozpočtu Evropských společenství“ nahrazují slovy „o souhrnném rozpočtu Evropské unie“.14. Článek 1 se nahrazuje tímto:„Článek 11. Toto nařízení stanoví pravidla pro sestavování a plnění souhrnného rozpočtu Evropské unie (dále jen „rozpočet“) a pro předkládání účtů a jejich audit.2. Pro účely tohoto nařízení se Hospodářský a sociální výbor, Výbor regionů, veřejný ochránce práv a evropský inspektor ochrany údajů považují za orgány Unie.Pro účely tohoto nařízení se Evropská centrální banka za orgán Unie nepovažuje.3. Pro účely tohoto nařízení se veškerými odkazy na „Společenství“ či na „Unii“ rozumí odkaz na „Evropskou unii a Evropské společenství pro atomovou energii“.“15. Článek 4 se mění takto:a) odst. 2 písm. a) se nahrazuje tímto:„a) příjmy a výdaje Evropské unie včetně správních výdajů, které vznikají orgánům z ustanovení Smlouvy o Evropské unii v oblasti společné zahraniční a bezpečnostní politiky, a operativních výdajů, které vzniknou z uplatňování těchto ustanovení, pokud jdou k tíži rozpočtu;“b) odstavec 3 se zrušuje.16. Článek 8 se mění takto:a) v odstavci 2 se slova „na hrubém národním produktu“ nahrazují slovy „na hrubém národním důchodu“;b) v odstavci 6 se slova „záruční sekce Evropského zemědělského orientačního a záručního fondu“ nahrazují slovy „Evropského zemědělského záručního fondu“.17. Článek 13 se mění takto:a) odstavec 1 se nahrazuje tímto:„1. Není-li na začátku rozpočtového roku rozpočet s konečnou platností schválen, použije se na závazky a platby těch výdajů, které mohly být zaúčtovány do zvláštní rozpočtové kapitoly jako část plnění posledního řádně schváleného rozpočtu, článek 315 Smlouvy o fungování Evropské unie.“b) odstavec 3 se nahrazuje tímto:„3. Pokud to kontinuita činnosti Unie a potřeby řízení vyžadují, může Rada na návrh Komise kvalifikovanou většinou schválit poskytnutí dvou nebo více prozatímních dvanáctin jak pro závazky, tak pro platby nad rámec prozatímních dvanáctin poskytnutých automaticky podle odstavců 1 a 2. Schvalovací rozhodnutí neprodleně předá Evropskému parlamentu.Rozhodnutí vstoupí v platnost třicet dnů po svém přijetí, pokud se během těchto třiceti dnů Evropský parlament, který se usnáší většinou hlasů svých členů, nerozhodne tyto výdaje snížit.Jestliže se Evropský parlament rozhodne tyto výdaje snížit, přezkoumá Rada rozhodnutí o jejich schválení s ohledem na částku schválenou Evropským parlamentem.Dodatečné dvanáctiny se schvalují jako celek a nelze je rozdělovat.“c) odstavec 4 se zrušuje.18. Článek 16 se nahrazuje tímto:„Článek 16Víceletý finanční rámec a rozpočet se sestavují a plní v eurech a účty se předkládají v eurech.Pro účely peněžních toků uvedených v článku 61 jsou však účetní a v případě zálohových účtů správce zálohových účtů a pro potřeby správního řízení útvarů odpovědných za vnější činnost Unie příslušná schvalující osoba oprávněni provádět operace v národních měnách za podmínek stanovených v prováděcích pravidlech.“19. Článek 24 se nahrazuje tímto:„Článek 241. Komise předloží svůj návrh současně oběma složkám rozpočtového orgánu.2. Rozpočtový orgán rozhodne o převodech prostředků za podmínek uvedených v odstavcích 3 až 6 s výhradou odchylek uvedených v hlavě I části druhé.3. S výjimkou naléhavých případů rozhodnou Rada (kvalifikovanou většinou) a Evropský parlament o návrhu Komise do šesti týdnů ode dne, ke kterému oba orgány předkládaný návrh na převod prostředků obdržely.4. Návrh na převod je schválen, jestliže ve lhůtě šesti týdnů:– návrh schválí obě složky;– návrh schválí jedna ze složek a druhá se zdrží jednání;– obě složky se zdrží jednání nebo nepřijmou rozhodnutí, které návrhu Komise odporuje.5. Šestitýdenní lhůta uvedená v odstavci 4 se v následujících případech zkrátí na tři týdny, ledaže jedna ze složek rozpočtového orgánu požaduje něco jiného:i) převod představuje méně než 10 % prostředků rozpočtové linie, ze které se převádí, a nepřesahuje 5 milionů EUR;neboii) převod se týká výhradně prostředků na platby a celková výše převodu nepřesahuje 100 milionů EUR.6. Pokud jedna ze složek rozpočtového orgánu převod změnila, zatímco druhá jej schválila nebo se zdržela jednání, popřípadě pokud obě složky převod změnily, považuje se za schválenou nižší částka schválená buď Evropským parlamentem, nebo Radou, jestliže Komise svůj návrh nestáhla.“20. Článek 26 se mění takto:a) v odst. 2 druhém pododstavci se první věta nahrazuje tímto:„Použije se postup podle čl. 24 odst. 3 a 4.“21. V čl. 27 odst. 3 se třetí věta nahrazuje tímto:„Tyto informace, uvedené v čl. 33 odst. 2 písm. d), se předávají každoročně a nejpozději s dokumenty přiloženými k návrhu rozpočtu.“22. V článku 30 se zrušuje odstavec 2.23. V článku 31 se první pododstavec nahrazuje tímto:„Evropský parlament, Evropská rada a Rada, Soudní dvůr Evropské unie, Účetní dvůr, Hospodářský a sociální výbor, Výbor regionů, veřejný ochránce práv a evropský inspektor ochrany údajů sestaví každý rok odhad svých příjmů a výdajů, který předají Komisi do 1. července.“24. Článek 33 se mění takto:a) odstavec 1 se nahrazuje tímto:„1. Komise předloží návrh rozpočtu Evropskému parlamentu a Radě nejpozději 1. září roku předcházejícího roku, ve kterém má být rozpočet plněn.Návrh rozpočtu obsahuje souhrnný celkový výkaz příjmů a výdajů Unie a souhrn odhadů uvedených v článku 31.“b) v odstavci 2 se úvodní věta nahrazuje tímto:„K návrhu rozpočtu Komise přikládá:“.25. Článek 34 se nahrazuje tímto:„Článek 34Až do svolání dohodovacího výboru uvedeného v článku 314 Smlouvy o fungování Evropské unie může Komise z vlastního podnětu nebo na žádost ostatních orgánů týkající se jejich oddílů předložit současně Evropskému parlamentu a Radě návrh na změnu návrhu rozpočtu na základě nových údajů, které nebyly v době jeho sestavení známy, včetně návrhu na změnu z důvodu aktualizace odhadu výdajů na zemědělství.“26. Vkládá se nový článek 34a, který zní:„Článek 34aJakmile se dohodovací výbor dohodne na společném návrhu, vyvinou Evropský parlament a Rada v souladu s čl. 314 odst. 6 Smlouvy o fungování Evropské unie a v souladu se svými vnitřními jednacími řády snahu o co nejrychlejší schválení výsledku jeho činnosti.“27. Článek 35 se zrušuje.28. Článek 37 se nahrazuje tímto:„Článek 371. Komise může v případě nevyhnutelných, mimořádných nebo nepředvídaných okolností předložit návrh opravného rozpočtu.Žádosti o opravný rozpočet od jiných orgánů než od Komise se v případě stejných okolností jako v předchozím pododstavci předávají Komisi.Před předložením návrhu opravného rozpočtu prověří Komise a ostatní orgány možnosti přerozdělení příslušných prostředků s přihlédnutím k případně očekávanému nedostatečnému vynakládání prostředků.2. S výjimkou mimořádných okolností předkládá Komise veškeré návrhy opravného rozpočtu současně Evropskému parlamentu a Radě nejpozději do 1. září každého roku. K žádostem o opravný rozpočet od jiných orgánů může přiložit stanovisko.3. Evropský parlament a Rada projednají návrhy s ohledem na jejich naléhavost.“29. Článek 38 se zrušuje.30. V článku 39 se první část věty nahrazuje tímto:„Komise a rozpočtový orgán se mohou dohodnout na prodloužení některých lhůt pro předávání odhadů a přijímání i předávání návrhu rozpočtu;“31. V článku 40 se doplňuje druhý pododstavec, který zní:„Evropská rada a Rada sdílejí stejný oddíl rozpočtu.“32. Článek 46 se mění takto:a) bod 2 odstavce 1 se nahrazuje tímto:„2) v každém oddíle rozpočtu se příjmy a výdaje vykazují ve stejné skladbě jako v bodě 1;“b) bod 5 odstavce 1 se zrušuje.33. V hlavě III se doplňuje kapitola 3, která zní:„ Kapitola 3 Rozpočtová kázeňČlánek 47aRozpočet je v souladu s víceletým finančním rámcem.Článek 47bJestliže by byla provedením aktu Unie překročena výše prostředků dostupných v rozpočtu nebo přídělů dostupných ve víceletém finančním rámci, může být takový akt finančně proveden až po změně rozpočtu a případně také po odpovídající revizi finančního rámce.“34. Článek 49 se mění takto:a) v odstavci 1 se první pododstavec nahrazuje tímto:„Prostředky zapsané v rozpočtu pro jakoukoli činnost Unie mohou být použity pouze po přijetí základního právního aktu.“b) odstavec 3 se nahrazuje tímto:„3. V oblasti působnosti hlavy V Smlouvy o EU může mít základní právní akt jednu z podob stanovených v čl. 26 odst. 2, čl. 28 odst. 1, článku 29, čl. 31 odst. 2 a článků 33 a 37 Smlouvy o EU.“c) odstavec 4 se zrušuje;d) odstavec 6 se mění takto:i) úvodní věta se nahrazuje tímto:„Odchylně od odstavců 1, 2 a 3 mohou být následující prostředky vynaloženy bez základního právního aktu, pokud akce, které jimi mají být financovány, spadají do pravomoci Unie:“ii) písmena b) a c) se nahrazují tímto:„b) prostředky na přípravné akce v oblasti působnosti Smlouvy o fungování Evropské unie a Smlouvy o Euratomu určené k přípravě návrhů pro přijetí budoucích akcí. Přípravné akce musí sledovat vnitřně provázaný přístup a mohou mít různé formy. Příslušné prostředky na závazky mohou být v rozpočtu zapsány nejdéle po dobu tří po sobě následujících rozpočtových roků. Legislativní proces musí být ukončen před koncem třetího rozpočtového roku. V průběhu legislativního procesu musí přidělování prostředků na závazky odpovídat zvláštním znakům přípravných akcí, pokud jde o plánované činnosti, sledované cíle a příjemce. Objem finančních prostředků proto nemůže odpovídat finančním prostředkům navrhovaným pro financování samotné konečné akce.Při předkládání návrhu rozpočtu podává Komise rozpočtovému orgánu zprávu o akcích uvedených v písmenu a) a v prvním pododstavci tohoto písmene, která obsahuje hodnocení dosažených výsledků a předpokládaná následná opatření;c) prostředky na přípravná opatření v oblasti působnosti hlavy V Smlouvy o EU. Tato opatření se omezují na krátké období a jsou určena na vytvoření podmínek pro akci Evropské unie ke splnění cílů společné zahraniční a bezpečnostní politiky a přijetí potřebných právních nástrojů.Pro účely operací EU na řešení krizí jsou přípravná opatření určena mimo jiné k posouzení operačních požadavků, k vytvoření podmínek pro rychlé úvodní nasazení zdrojů nebo k tomu, aby byly na místě vytvořeny podmínky pro zahájení operace.Přípravná opatření schvaluje Rada na návrh vysokého představitele Unie pro zahraniční věci a bezpečnostní politiku.K zajištění rychlého provedení přípravných opatření uvědomí vysoký představitel Unie pro zahraniční věci a bezpečnostní politiku bez zbytečného odkladu Komisi o záměru Rady zahájit přípravné opatření, a zejména o odhadovaných zdrojích, kterých je pro tento účel zapotřebí. Komise přijme v souladu s tímto nařízením veškerá potřebná opatření, aby zajistila rychlé uvolnění těchto finančních prostředků;“.35. Ustanovení čl. 146 odst. 2 se nahrazuje tímto:„2. Před udělením absolutoria Evropský parlament přezkoumá, poté co tak učiní Rada, závěrečný účet, finanční rozvahu a hodnotící zprávu podle článku 318 Smlouvy o fungování Evropské unie. Současně přezkoumá výroční zprávu Účetního dvora a odpovědi kontrolovaných orgánů, zvláštní zprávy Účetního dvora za uvedený rozpočtový rok a jeho prohlášení o věrohodnosti účtů a o legalitě a správnosti uskutečněných operací.“36. Vkládá se nový článek 155a, který zní:„Článek 155aEvropský parlament a Rada se zavazují, že dodrží příděly prostředků na závazky stanovené příslušnými základními právními akty pro strukturální opatření, rozvoj venkova a Evropský rybářský fond.“37. Článek 184 se nahrazuje tímto:„Článek 184Každé tři roky nebo pokaždé, kdy to bude nezbytné, se toto nařízení přezkoumá postupem stanoveným v článku 322 Smlouvy o fungování Evropské unie.“Článek 2Toto nařízení vstupuje v platnost třetím dnem po vyhlášení v Úředním věstníku Evropské unie .Ustanovení čl. 1 bodu 2 se však použije ode dne 1. prosince 2009.Toto nařízení je závazné v celém rozsahu a přímo použitelné ve všech členských státech.V Bruselu dne .Za Evropský parlament Za Radupředseda předseda / předsedkyně [1] Úř. věst. C , , s. .[2] Úř. věst. L 248, 16.9.2002, s. 1.[3] Úř. věst. C 139, 14.6.2006, s. 1.


type: wikipedia

text:
Norbert Bugeja twieled is-Siġġiewi fl-1980. Huwa għallem il-letteratura Ingliża u l-kritika letterarja fil-Kulleġġ Ġan Franġisk Abela ta' l-Università ta' Malta u ħadem bħala ġurnalist. Kiteb il-lirika għal diversi kanzunetti tal-grupp Etnika u kien attiv fl-organizzazzjoni kulturali Inizjamed sa mill-bidunett taghha. Għal ħames snin kien l-editur letterarju tal-gazzetta IL-GENSillum.
 Ix-xogħlijiet letterarji tiegħu kisbu popolarità fost il-ġenerazzjoni żagħżugħa ta' qarrejja Maltin u dehru f'għadd ta' antoloġiji, ġabriet, ġurnali letterarji (fosthom 'Cadences', ġurnal letterarju ta' l-Università ta' Ċipru) u programmi tar-radju u t-televiżjoni. Qara x-xogħlijiet tiegħu f'għadd ta' festivals letterarji.
 Il-Poeżija
 Il-poeżija ta' Norbert Buġeja taħfen l-aspetti varji ta' l-urbanità kontemporanja u tagħmel dan b'idjoma għal kollox friska fil-letteratura ta' Malta. Buġeja kontinwament ifittex is-sbuħija fl-ambjenti li ħoqna b'idejna: l-ibliet li fihom tinħma ħjjitna ta' kuljum. L-ibliet li nafu jew ma nafux bihom, it-toroq imdella li nibżgħu minnhom, il-pjazez li niskartaw jew li nfittxu biex nagħmlu frattarija, il-ħwienet fejn ninnegozjaw magħna nfusna, il-bars fejn nidħlu nsegwu lil ħajjitna tixjieħ u tintelaq minn grokk għal grokk.
 Buġeja jfittex metafora ġdida għal-letteratura Maltija, miktuba fi xbihat oriġinali u b'reqqa kbira fit-teknika letterarja, fil-metrika, r-ritmu u l-prosodija. Jinsisti fuq il-modi differenti kif il-poeżija 'tasal' ghand l-udjenza meta tinqara, u ghaldaqstant ifittex li janima l-qari ta' xogħlijietu b'mod li jinvolvi lil min ikun qiegħed isegwi l-poeżija f'intimità akbar max-xogħol.
 Norbert Bugeja iggradwa b'summa cum laude fil-Baċellerat u b'Distinction fil-Masters fil-letteratura Ingliża mill-Università ta' Malta. Bħalissa qiegħed iħejji d-dottorat fil-letteratura Ingliża u l-postkolonjaliżmu fl-Ingilterra. L-ewwel ġabra ta' xogħlijiet tiegħu kienet Stay, Fairy Tale, Stay - memoirs of a City Cast Adrift (Midsea Books, 2005. Trad. Maria Grech Ganado).
 Ippubblika għadd ta kitbiet kritiċi u qara diversi papers f'konferenzi akkademiċi, fosthom fl-Istitut Mediterranju u fid-Dipartiment ta' l-Ingliż fl-Universita ta Malta. Fl-2005 qara x-xogħol tiegħu fil-Konferenza EACLALS (European Association for Commonwealth Language and Literature Studies). Il-ġabra l-ġdida ta' poeżiji tiegħu bil-Malti (kitbiet li pproduċa fil-perjodu 1999-2006) mistennija tkun ippubblikata dalwaqt.
 F'kumment tieghu dwar il-poeżija ta' Buġeja, Albert Marshall iddeskrivih bħala poeta ewlieni li qed jgħaqqad il-pont tal-poezija Maltija mas-seklu wiehed u ghoxrin.
 Bibljografija
 Stay, Fairy Tale, Stay! Memoirs of a City Cast Adrift, 2005
 Referenzi
 Ħoloq esterni
 Twieldu fl-1980
 Poeti Maltin
 Letteratura Kontemporanja Maltija


type: other

text:
Vragen bij hoge studiekosten gerechtshof | N-VA Puurs
 Vragen bij hoge studiekosten gerechtshof
 Home » Nieuws » Vragen bij hoge studiekosten gerechtshof
 Senator Inge Faes (N-VA) stelt zich vragen bij de hoge studiekosten voor de uitbreiding van het gerechtshof in Mechelen. Die bedragen bijna 1,1 miljoen euro.
 Het gerechtshof in de Keizerstraat in de Mechelse binnenstad is een van de kleinste van het land, en ook een van de meest onveilige. "Een renovatie is nodig", stelt Faes, zelf advocaat. In een eerste fase verhuist een deel van de rechtbank in het voormalige paleis van Margareta van Oostenrijk uit de 16de eeuw naar het oude gasthuis aan de overkant van de straat.
 Dat project moet eind 2017 een feit zijn, en kost meer dan 8,5 miljoen euro. De studiekosten voor die eerste fase zijn volgens senator Inge Faes peperduur. "De kosten voor de studies (300.000 euro) en voor het ontwerp (769.000 euro) bedragen samen meer dan een miljoen euro. Dat is beduidend meer dan de 800.000 euro die de regering in 2012 voorzag", zegt ze.
 De politica betreurt ook dat er voor fase twee nog geen concrete plannen zijn. Daarbij is sprake van een volledige verhuizing van het gerechtshof naar het voormalige Dodoensziekenhuis aan de Zwartzustersvest, waar voorlopig nog een campus van het AZ Sint-Maarten is gevestigd tot de nieuwbouw in Mechelen-Noord klaar is. "Een spijtige zaak", meent senator Faes. "De maatregelen op korte termijn zijn broodnodig, maar zoals bij heel wat gerechtsgebouwen het geval is, worden structurele maatregelen op de lange baan geschoven."


type: caselaw

jurisdiction: EU

text:
 30.12.2006
 LV
 Eiropas Savienības Oficiālais Vēstnesis
 C 326/60
 Prasība, kas celta 2006. gada 6. novembrī — UniCredito Italiano pret ITSB — Union Investment Privatfonds (“Uniweb”)
 (Lieta T-303/06)
 (2006/C 326/130)
 Valoda, kādā sagatavots prasības pieteikums — itāļu
 Lietas dalībnieki
 Prasītāja: UniCredito Italiano S.p.A., Dženova (Itālija) (pārstāvji — G. Floridia un R. Floridia, Avvocati)
 Atbildētājs: Iekšējā tirgus saskaņošanas birojs (preču zīmes, paraugi un modeļi)
 Otra procesa Apelāciju padomē dalībniece: Union Investment Privatfonds GmbH
 Prasītājas prasījumi:
 —
 atcelt Iekšējā tirgus saskaņošanas biroja (ITSB) Apelāciju otrās padomes 2006. gada 5. septembra lēmumu apvienotajās lietās R 196/2005–2 un R 211/2005–2, kas attiecās uz iebildumu procesu B490971 par Kopienas preču zīmes reģistrācijas pieteikumu Nr. 2 236 164.
 Pamati un galvenie argumenti
 Kopienas preču zīmes reģistrācijas pieteikuma iesniedzēja: prasītāja
 Attiecīgā Kopienas preču zīme: vārdiska preču zīme “UNIWEB” (reģistrācijas pieteikums Nr. 2 236 164) attiecībā uz 35., 36. un 42. klasi
 Iebildumu procesā pretstatītās preču zīmes vai apzīmējuma īpašniece: Union Investment Privatfonds GmbH, agrāk Union Investment Gesellschaft GmbH
 Pretstatītā preču zīme vai apzīmējums: vārdiskas Vācijas preču zīmes “UNIFONDS” (Nr. 991 995) un “UNIRAK” (Nr. 991 997) un grafiska Vācijas preču zīme “UNIZINS” (Nr. 2 016 954) attiecībā uz 36. klasē ietilpstošajām kapitāla investīcijām
 Iebildumu nodaļas lēmums: iebildumus daļēji apmierināt, ciktāl sajaukšanas iespēja tiek atzīta “tikai attiecībā uz pakalpojumiem, kas uzskatāmi par līdzīgiem”
 Apelāciju padomes lēmums: apelāciju noraidīt
 Izvirzītie pamati: Apstrīdētais lēmums piemērojot kļūdaini plašākas aizsardzības teoriju, kuru Eiropas Kopienu Pirmās instances tiesa ir ieviesusi 2006. gada 23. februāra spriedumā lietā T-194/03 Brainbridge, par labu tā sauktajām sērijveida preču zīmēm, jo neesot izpildīti divi tam vajadzīgie priekšnosacījumi: a) agrāko preču zīmju sērijas kopējo elementu atšķirtspēja un b) priekšnosacījums, ka agrākās preču zīmes ir tikušas izmantotas un no konkrētās sabiedrības daļas viedokļa ir uztvertas tādējādi, ka tās attiecas uz lielu skaitu precēm un/vai pakalpojumiem.


type: contracts

text:
 Avis juridique important
 |
 22003A1007(01)
 Accordo tra l'Unione europea e la Repubblica di Cipro sulla partecipazione della Repubblica di Cipro alla forza dell'Unione europea (EUF) nella Repubblica democratica del Congo
 Gazzetta ufficiale n. L 253 del 07/10/2003 pag. 0023 - 0025
 TRADUZIONEAccordotra l'Unione europea e la Repubblica di Cipro sulla partecipazione della Repubblica di Cipro alla forza dell'Unione europea (EUF) nella Repubblica democratica del CongoL'UNIONE EUROPEA,da una parte, eLA REPUBBLICA DI CIPRO,dall'altra,in appresso denominate "le Parti",TENUTO CONTO:- dell'adozione da parte del Consiglio dell'Unione europea dell'azione comune 2003/423/PESC, del 5 giugno 2003, relativa all'operazione militare dell'Unione europea nella Repubblica democratica del Congo(1),- dell'invito rivolto alla Repubblica di Cipro a partecipare all'operazione diretta dall'UE,- del completamento positivo del processo di costituzione della forza e della raccomandazione del comandante dell'operazione dell'UE e del comitato militare dell'UE di approvare la partecipazione delle forze della Repubblica di Cipro all'operazione diretta dall'UE,- della decisione RDC/2/03 del comitato politico e di sicurezza, dell'11 luglio 2003, relativa alla costituzione del comitato dei contributori per l'operazione militare dell'UE nella Repubblica democratica del Congo(2),- della decisione RDC/3/03 del comitato politico e di sicurezza, del 31 luglio 2003, relativa all'accettazione del contributo della Repubblica di Cipro all'operazione militare diretta dall'UE nella Repubblica democratica del Congo(3),HANNO CONVENUTO QUANTO SEGUE:Articolo 1Contesto e definizioni1. La Repubblica di Cipro accetta di attuare le disposizioni dell'azione comune 2003/423/PESC, conformemente alle disposizioni del presente accordo.2. Ai fini del presente accordo, valgono le seguenti definizioni:a) "operazione Artemis": l'operazione militare dell'Unione europea nella Repubblica democratica del Congo prevista nell'azione comune 2003/423/PESC;b) "forza dell'Unione europea" (EUF): i comandi militari dell'UE, le unità/gli elementi nazionali componenti che contribuiscono all'operazione Artemis, i mezzi e i mezzi di trasporto;c) "personale EUF": il personale civile e militare assegnato all'EUF;d) "comandante della forza dell'UE": il comandante della forza dell'UE sul teatro delle operazioni, nominato dal Consiglio dell'Unione europea il 5 giugno 2003;e) "comandante dell'operazione dell'UE": il comandante dell'operazione Artemis, nominato dal Consiglio dell'Unione europea il 5 giugno 2003.Articolo 2Partecipazione all'operazione1. La Repubblica di Cipro garantisce che le sue forze e il suo personale che partecipano all'EUF effettuino la missione conformemente alle disposizioni dell'azione comune 2003/423/PESC, al piano di operazione e alle misure di attuazione.2. La Repubblica di Cipro informa il comandante dell'operazione dell'UE di qualsiasi modifica concernente la propria partecipazione all'operazione Artemis.Articolo 3Status1. Lo status dell'EUF e del personale EUF partecipanti all'operazione Artemis è disciplinato dall'accordo tra l'Unione europea e la Repubblica democratica del Congo e dall'accordo tra l'Unione europea e la Repubblica dell'Uganda sullo status delle forze dirette dall'Unione europea e relative modalità di attuazione.2. Lo status del personale EUF fornito a comandi o elementi di comando situati al di fuori della Repubblica democratica del Congo e della Repubblica dell'Uganda è disciplinato da disposizioni in essere fra i comandi e gli elementi di comando interessati e la Repubblica di Cipro.Articolo 4Catena di comando1. Tutte le forze e il personale partecipanti all'EUF restano interamente sotto il comando delle loro autorità nazionali.2. Le autorità nazionali trasferiscono il controllo operativo (OP/CON) al comandante dell'operazione dell'UE. Il comandante dell'operazione dell'UE può delegare i poteri.3. La Repubblica di Cipro, nella gestione quotidiana dell'operazione Artemis, ha gli stessi diritti e obblighi degli Stati membri partecipanti.4. La Repubblica di Cipro esercita la giurisdizione sul proprio personale che partecipa all'EUF. Il comandante dell'operazione dell'UE può in qualsiasi momento richiedere il ritiro del contributo della Repubblica di Cipro.5. Un alto rappresentante militare (SMR-Senior Military Representative) è nominato dalla Repubblica di Cipro per rappresentarne il contingente nazionale in seno all'EUF. L'SMR si consulta con il comandante della forza dell'UE su tutte le questioni inerenti all'operazione Artemis ed è responsabile della disciplina quotidiana del contingente.Articolo 5Informazioni classificateLa Repubblica di Cipro adotta le misure adeguate per garantire che, nel trattare informazioni classificate UE, il suo personale partecipante all'EUF rispetti le norme di sicurezza del Consiglio dell'Unione europea, contenute nella decisione 2001/264/CE del Consiglio, del 19 marzo 2001(4), e gli ulteriori orientamenti formulati dal comandante dell'operazione dell'UE.Articolo 6Aspetti finanziariLa Repubblica di Cipro sostiene tutti i costi connessi alla partecipazione all'operazione Artemis, a meno che tali costi non siano soggetti a finanziamento comune in base allo stato delle spese dell'operazione.Articolo 7Composizione delle controversieQualora non si giunga ad una composizione, le controversie connesse all'interpretazione o all'applicazione del presente accordo sono composte dalle parti per via diplomatica.Articolo 8InadempienzaQualora una delle parti non adempia agli obblighi che le incombono ai sensi degli articoli precedenti, l'altra parte ha diritto a recedere dal presente accordo con un preavviso di un mese.Articolo 9Entrata in vigoreIl presente accordo entra in vigore alla data della firma.Esso resta in vigore per la durata del contributo dalla Repubblica di Cipro all'operazione Artemis.Fatto a Bruxelles, addì 1o ottobre 2003, in lingua inglese in quattro copie.(1) GU L 143 dell'11.6.2003, pag. 50.(2) GU L 184 del 23.7.2003, pag. 13.(3) GU L 206 del 15.8.2003, pag. 32.(4) GU L 101 dell'11.4.2001, pag. 1.


text:
 21.3.2009
 SL
 Uradni list Evropske unije
 C 69/51
 Tožba, vložena 26. januarja 2009 – Procaps proti UUNT – Biofarma (PROCAPS)
 (Zadeva T-35/09)
 (2009/C 69/112)
 Jezik, v katerem je bila tožba vložena: španščina
 Stranke
 Tožeča stranka: Procaps, SA (Barranquilla, Kolumbija) (zastopnik: M. Vidal-Quadras Trias de Bes, odvetnik)
 Tožena stranka: Urad za usklajevanje na notranjem trgu (znamke in modeli)
 Druga stranka pred odborom za pritožbe: Biofarma SAS (Neuilly sur Seine, Francija)
 Predlogi tožeče stranke
 —
 Razveljavitev odločbe četrtega odbora za pritožbe UUNT (Urad za usklajevanje na notranjem trgu, znamke in modeli) z dne 24. novembra 2008 v zadevi R 867/2007-4, ki je bila strankam vročena 25. novembra.
 Tožbeni razlogi in bistvene trditve
 Prijavitelj znamke Skupnosti: tožeča stranka.
 Zadevna znamka Skupnosti: besedna znamka „PROCAPS“ (prijava št. 3.519.394) za proizvode in storitve iz razredov 5, 35, 39, 40 in 44.
 Imetnik znamke ali znaka, navajanega v postopku z ugovorom: BIOFARMA, société par actions simplifiée.
 Znamka ali znak, navajan v postopku z ugovorom: nacionalna in mednarodna besedna znamka „PROCAPTAN“ za proizvode iz razreda 5.
 Odločba oddelka za ugovore: zavrnitev ugovora.
 Odločba odbora za pritožbe: delna zavrnitev pritožbe.
 Navajani tožbeni razlogi: nepravilna uporaba člena 9(1)(b) Uredbe (ES) št. 40/94 o znamki Skupnosti.


text:
 30.7.2011
 PL
 Dziennik Urzędowy Unii Europejskiej
 C 226/10
 Wniosek o wydanie orzeczenia w trybie prejudycjalnym złożony przez Bundesfinanzhof (Niemcy) w dniu 13 kwietnia 2011 r. — Finanzamt Steglitz przeciwko Ines Zimmermann
 (Sprawa C-174/11)
 2011/C 226/17
 Język postępowania: niemiecki
 Sąd krajowy
 Bundesfinanzhof
 Strony w postępowaniu przed sądem krajowym
 Strona skarżąca: Finanzamt Steglitz
 Strona pozwana: Ines Zimmermann
 Pytania prejudycjalne
 1)
 Czy art. 13 część A ust. 1 lit. g) lub ust. 2 lit. a) szóstej dyrektywy Rady 77/388/EWG z dnia 17 maja 1977 r. w sprawie harmonizacji ustawodawstw państw członkowskich w odniesieniu do podatków obrotowych (1) pozwala ustawodawcy krajowemu na uzależnienie zwolnienia z podatku świadczeń z zakresu pozaszpitalnej opieki nad osobami chorymi i wymagającymi opieki od warunku, by w przypadku podmiotów realizujących te świadczenia „w poprzednim roku kalendarzowym koszty opieki zostały pokryte w co najmniej w dwóch trzecich przypadków w całości lub w przeważającej części przez ustawowe instytucje ubezpieczeń społecznych lub pomocy socjalnej” [§ 4 pkt 16 lit. e) Umsatzsteuergesetz 1993 (ustawy o podatku obrotowym z 1993 r.)]?
 2)
 Czy, uwzględniając zasadę neutralności podatku od wartości dodanej, dla udzielenia odpowiedzi na to pytanie ma znaczenie okoliczność, że ustawodawca krajowy uznaje te same świadczenia na innych warunkach za wolne od podatku, jeżeli są one wykonywane przez oficjalnie uznane stowarzyszenia niezależnej opieki socjalnej oraz służące niezależnej opiece socjalnej korporacje, zrzeszenia osób i masy majątkowe, które są członkami stowarzyszenia niezależnej opieki socjalnej (§ 4 pkt 18 Umsatzsteuergesetz 1993)?
 (1) Dz.U. L 145, s. 1


text:
Ейбрахам „Брам“ Стокър () е ирландски писател, спечелил слава като автора на романа на ужаса „Дракула“, разказващ за живота на Влад Цепеш.
 Биография
 Роден е на 8 ноември 1847 г. в крайбрежното село Клонтарф (днес квартал на Дъблин). Той е третото от седемте деца в семейството на Ейбрахам и Шарлот Стокър. Малко известен факт е, че най-големият му брат е сър Торнли Стокър, признат лекар и автор. Брам е прикован на легло от болест през първите 7 години от живота си. Тогава се излекува напълно и дори практикува успешно спорт в училище. Учи история, литература, математика и физика в Тринити Колидж в Дъблинския университет.
 Започва да се интересува от театър. Става театрален критик в „Дъблин Ивнинг Мейл“. Веднъж дава хвалебствено ревю за ролята на Хамлет, изпълнена от Хенри Ървинг. Ървинг го кани на вечеря и така двамата стават приятели.
 През 1878 г. се жени за Флорънс Балком, дъщеря на подполковника Джеймс Балком. Тя е популярна красавица, която по-рано била ухажвана от Оскар Уайлд. Двамата се местят в Лондон. Година по-късно се ражда единственото им дете, което кръщават Ървинг Ноел Торнли Стокър. В Лондон Брам Стокър започва да менажира „Lyceum Theatre“ – позиция, която запазва 27 години. Запознава се със сър Артър Конан Дойл и се оказва, че двамата са далечни роднини.
 Стокър става известен покрай актьора Ървинг. Двамата обикалят Обединеното кралство и САЩ за представления. В Америка Стокър се запознава с президента Теодор Рузвелт и своя литературен идол Уолт Уитман.
 През 1890 г. излиза първата му по-известна книга – „The Snake’s Pass“. Няколко години по-късно се запознава с унгарския пътешественик и писател Армин Вамбери. Смята се, че вдъхновение за „Дракула“ са били мрачните истории на Вамбери за карпатските планини. Макар книгата да има успех, тя нашумява години след неговата смърт. Стокър публикува и още два по-известни романа на ужаса – „The Lady of the Shroud“ и „The Lair of the White Worm“. Освен „Дракула“ на български са преведени още творбите му „Гостът на Дракула“, „Украшението със седем звезди“ и „Принцът на розите“ – произведение, писано заедно с Оскар Уайлд.
 Брам Стокър умира на 20 април 1912 г. в Лондон, Англия. Точната причина за смъртта му не е известна, като някои биографи смятат, че става въпрос за вариация на сифилис.
 След смъртта си Стокър се утвърждава като важна фигура в литературата. Образът на Дракула е многократно използван в различни телевизионни, литературни и кино продукции. На негово име Асоциацията на писателите на хоръри учредява годишната литературна награда за хорър „Брам Стокър“.
 Библиография
 Романи
 The Primrose Path (1875)
 The Dualitists: Or, the Death Doom of the Double Born (1887)
 The Snake's Pass (1890)
 The Shoulder of Shasta (1895)
 The Watter's Mou (1895)
 Dracula (1897)
 Miss Betty (1898)
 The Mystery Of The Sea (1902)
 The Jewel of Seven Stars (1903)
 The Man (1905)
 Lady Athlyne (1908)
 The Lady of the Shroud (1909)
 The Lair of the White Worm (1911)
 Колекции от разкази
 Under the Sunset (1881)
 Snowbound: The Record of a Theatrical Touring Party (1908)
 Dracula's Guest (1914)
 The Bram Stoker Bedside Companion: Stories of Fantasy and Horror (1973)
 Shades of Dracula: Bram Stoker's Uncollected Stories (1981)
 Midnight Tales (1988)
 Best Ghost Stories (1997)
 The Judge's House: And Other Weird Tales (2003)
 Екранизации
 „Носферату - симфония на ужаса“ (1921), режисьор: Фридрих Вилхелм Мурнау с Макс Шрек в главната роля на граф Орлок.
 „Дракула“ (1931), режисьор: Тод Браунинг с Бела Лугоши в ролята на граф Дракула (базиран като сюжет главно върху театралната постановка).
 „Дракула“ (1958), режисьор: Терънс Фишър с Кристофър Лий в ролята на граф Дракула.
 „Нощем, когато Дракула се събужда“ (1970), режисьор Джес Франко, с Кристофър Лий в ролята на граф Дракула.
 „Дракула“ (1972), режисьор: Дан Къртис с Джак Паланс в ролята на граф Дракула/Влад ІІІ Цепеш.
 „Дракула“ (1979), режисьор: Джон Бедам с Франк Лангела в ролята на граф Дракула (римейк на филма на Браунинг).
 „Носферату - призракът на нощта“ (1979), режисьор: Вернер Херцог с Клаус Кински (римейк на филма на Мурнау).
 „Дракула по Брам Стокър“ (1992), режисьор: Франсис Форд Копола, с Гари Олдман в ролята на княз Влад ІІІ Дракула.
 „Дракула 2000“ (2000), режисьор: Патрик Лейсър, с Джерард Бътлър в ролята на Дракула/Юда Искариотски.
 Външни препратки
 Някои произведения на Брам Стокър
 Личности от Викторианската епоха
 Ирландски писатели на хоръри
 Ирландски автори на разкази
 Ирландски романисти
 Родени в Дъблин
 Починали в Лондон


text:
 12.6.2010
 EN
 Official Journal of the European Union
 L 148/34
 Only the original UN/ECE texts have legal effect under international public law. The status and date of entry into force of this Regulation should be checked in the latest version of the UN/ECE status document TRANS/WP.29/343, available at:
 http://www.unece.org/trans/main/wp29/wp29wgs/wp29gen/wp29fdocstts.html
 Regulation No 23 of the Economic Commission for Europe of the United Nations (UN/ECE) — Uniform provisions concerning the approval of reversing lamps for power-driven vehicles and their trailers
 Incorporating all valid text up to:
 Supplement 15 to the original version of the Regulation — Date of entry into force: 15 October 2008
 CONTENTS
 REGULATION
 0.
 Scope
 1.
 Definitions
 2.
 Application for approval
 3.
 Markings
 4.
 Approval
 5.
 General specifications
 6.
 Intensity of light emitted
 7.
 Test procedure
 8.
 Colour of light emitted
 9.
 Conformity of production
 10.
 Penalties for non-conformity of production
 11.
 Production definitely discontinued
 12.
 Names and addresses of Technical Services responsible for conducting approval tests, and of Administrative Departments
 ANNEXES
 Annex 1 —
 Communication concerning the approval or extension or refusal or withdrawal of approval or production definitely discontinued of a type of reversing lamp pursuant to Regulation No 23
 Annex 2 —
 Examples of arrangements of approval marks
 Annex 3 —
 Photometric measurements
 Annex 4 —
 Colour of white light (trichromatic coordinates)
 Annex 5 —
 Minimum requirements for conformity of production control procedures
 Annex 6 —
 Minimum requirements for sampling by an inspector
 0. SCOPE
 This Regulation applies to reversing lamps for vehicles of categories M, N, O, and T (1).
 1. DEFINITIONS
 For the purposes of this Regulation,
 1.1.
 ‘Reversing lamp’ means the lamp of the vehicle designed to illuminate the road to the rear of the vehicle and to warn other road users that the vehicle is reversing or about to reverse;
 1.2.
 The definitions given in Regulation No 48 and its series of amendments in force at the time of application for type approval shall apply to this Regulation.
 1.3.
 ‘Reversing lamps of different types’ means lamps which differ in such essential respects as:
 (a)
 the trade name or mark;
 (b)
 the characteristics of the optical system, (levels of intensity, light distribution angles, category of filament lamp, light source module, etc.);
 A change of the colour of the filament lamp or the colour of any filter does not constitute a change of type.
 1.4.
 References made in this Regulation to standard (étalon) filament lamp(s) and to Regulation No 37 shall refer to Regulation No 37 and its series of amendments in force at the time of application for type approval.
 2. APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL
 2.1.
 The application for approval shall be submitted by the holder of the trade name or mark, or by his duly accredited representative.
 At the choice of the applicant, it will specify that the device may be installed on the vehicle with different inclinations of the reference axis in respect to the vehicle reference planes and to the ground or rotate around its reference axis; these different conditions of installation shall be indicated in the communication form.
 2.2.
 For each type of reversing lamp, the application shall be accompanied by:
 2.2.1.
 drawings, in triplicate, in sufficient detail to permit identification of the type of the reversing lamp and showing in what geometrical position(s) the reversing lamp may be mounted on the vehicle; the axis of observation to be taken as the axis of reference in the tests (horizontal angle H = 0, vertical angle V = 0); and the point to be taken as the centre of reference in the said tests. The drawings must show the position intended for the approval number and the additional symbol in relation to the circle of the approval mark;
 2.2.2.
 a brief technical description stating in particular, with the exception of lamps with non-replaceable light sources:
 (a)
 the category or categories of filament lamp(s) prescribed; this filament lamp category shall be one of those contained in Regulation No 37 and its series of amendments in force at the time of application for type approval; and/or
 (b)
 the light source module specific identification code.
 2.2.3.
 two samples. If the devices are not identical but are symmetrical and suitable for mounting one on the left and one on the right side of the vehicle, the two samples submitted may be identical and be suitable for mounting only on the right or only on the left side of the vehicle.
 3. MARKINGS
 The samples of a type of reversing lamp submitted for approval shall:
 3.1.
 bear the trade name or mark of the applicant; this marking shall be clearly legible and be indelible;
 3.2.
 with the exception of lamps with non-replaceable light sources bear a clearly legible and indelible marking indicating:
 (a)
 the category or categories of filament lamp(s) prescribed; and/or
 (b)
 the light source module specific identification code.
 3.3.
 if necessary in order to prevent any mistake in mounting the reversing lamp on the vehicle, bear the word ‘TOP’ marked horizontally on the uppermost part of the illuminating surface;
 3.4.
 provide adequate space for the approval mark and for the additional symbols prescribed in paragraph 4.3 below; the said space shall be shown in the drawing referred to in paragraph 2.2.1 above;
 3.5.
 in the case of lamps with non-replaceable light sources or light source module(s), bear the marking of rated voltage or the range of voltage, and the rated wattage.
 3.6.
 in the case of lamps with light source module(s), the light source module(s) shall bear:
 3.6.1.
 the trade name or mark of the applicant; this marking must be clearly legible and indelible;
 3.6.2.
 the specific identification code of the module; this marking must be clearly legible and indelible. This specific identification code shall comprise the starting letters ‘MD’ for ‘MODULE’ followed by the approval marking without the circle as prescribed in paragraph 4.3.1.1 below and, in the case several non identical light source modules are used, followed by additional symbols or characters; this specific identification code shall be shown in the drawings mentioned in paragraph 2.2.1 above.
 The approval marking does not have to be the same as the one on the lamp in which the module is used, but both markings shall be from the same applicant.
 3.6.3.
 the marking of the rated voltage and rated wattage.
 4. APPROVAL
 4.1. If the two samples of a type of reversing lamp meet the requirements of this Regulation, approval shall be granted.
 4.2. An approval number shall be assigned to each type approved. The same Contracting Party shall not assign the same number to another type of reversing lamp covered by this Regulation. Notice of approval or of extension or refusal or withdrawal of approval or production definitely discontinued of a type of reversing lamp pursuant to this Regulation shall be communicated to the Parties to the 1958 Agreement which apply this Regulation by means of a form conforming to the model in Annex 1 to this Regulation.
 4.3. Every reversing lamp conforming to a type approved under this Regulation shall bear in the space referred to in paragraph 3.4 above, in addition the mark and the particulars prescribed above in paragraphs 3.1, 3.2 and 3.3 or 3.5 respectively:
 4.3.1.
 an international approval mark consisting of:
 4.3.1.1.
 a circle surrounding the letter ‘E’ followed by the distinguishing number of the country which has granted the approval (2); and
 4.3.1.2.
 an approval number;
 4.3.2.
 an additional symbol consisting of letters A and R, mingled as shown in Annex 2 to this Regulation.
 4.3.3.
 The first two digits of the approval number which indicate the most recent series of amendments to this Regulation may be placed in the vicinity of the additional symbol ‘AR’.
 4.3.4.
 On lamps of which the visibility angles are asymmetrical with regard to the reference axis in a horizontal direction, an arrow pointing towards the side on which the photometric specifications are met up to an angle of 45° H.
 4.4. Independent lamps
 If different types of lamps complying with the requirements of several Regulations, use the same outer lens having the same or different colour, a single international approval mark may be affixed, consisting of a circle surrounding the letter ‘E’ followed by the distinguishing number of the country which has granted the approval, and an approval number. This approval mark may be located anywhere on the lamp, provided that:
 4.4.1.
 It is visible after their installation.
 4.4.2.
 The identification symbol for each lamp appropriate to each Regulation under which approval has been granted, together with the corresponding series of amendments incorporating the most recent major technical amendments to the Regulation at the time of issue of the approval and if necessary, the required arrow shall be marked.
 4.4.3.
 The size of the components of a single approval mark shall not be less than the minimum size required for the smallest of the individual marks by the Regulation under which approval has been granted.
 4.4.4.
 The main body of the lamp shall include the space described in paragraph 3.4 above and shall bear the approval mark of the actual function(s).
 4.4.5.
 Model E in Annex 2 to this Regulation gives examples of an approval mark with the above-mentioned additional symbols.
 4.5. When two or more lamps are part of the same assembly of grouped, combined or reciprocally incorporated lamps, approval is granted only if each of these lamps satisfies the requirements of this Regulation or of another Regulation. Lamps not satisfying any one of those Regulations shall not be part of such an assembly of grouped, combined or reciprocally incorporated lamps.
 4.5.1.
 Where grouped, combined or reciprocally incorporated lamps comply with the requirements of several Regulations, a single international approval mark may be applied, consisting of a circle surrounding the letter ‘E’ followed by the distinguishing number of the country which has granted the approval, an approval number and, if necessary, the required arrow. This approval mark may be placed anywhere on the grouped, combined or reciprocally incorporated lamps provided that:
 4.5.1.1.
 It is visible after their installation;
 4.5.1.2.
 No part of the grouped, combined or reciprocally incorporated lamps that transmits light can be removed without at the same time removing the approval mark.
 4.5.2.
 The identification symbol for each lamp appropriate to each Regulation under which approval has been granted, together with the corresponding series of amendments incorporating the most recent major technical amendments to the Regulation at the time of issue of the approval, shall be marked:
 4.5.2.1.
 Either on the appropriate light-emitting surface,
 4.5.2.2.
 Or in a group, in such a way that each lamp of the grouped, combined or reciprocally incorporated lamps may be clearly identified (see three possible examples in Annex 2).
 4.5.3.
 The size of the components of a single approval mark shall not be less than the minimum size required for the smallest of the individual marks by a Regulation under which approval has been granted.
 4.5.4.
 An approval number shall be assigned to each type approved. The same Contracting Party may not assign the same number to another type of grouped, combined or reciprocally incorporated lamps covered by this Regulation.
 4.6. The mark and symbol referred to in paragraphs 4.3.1 and 4.3.2 shall be indelible and shall be clearly legible even when the reversing lamp is mounted on the vehicle.
 4.7. Annex 2 gives examples of approval marks for a single lamp (Figure 1) and for grouped, combined or reciprocally incorporated lamps (Figure 2) with all the additional symbols referred to above, in which the letters A and R are mingled.
 5. GENERAL SPECIFICATIONS
 5.1.
 Each sample shall conform to the specifications set forth in the paragraphs below.
 5.2.
 Reversing lamps shall be so designed and constructed that in normal use, despite the vibration to which they may then be subjected, they continue to function satisfactorily and retain the characteristics prescribed by this Regulation.
 5.3.
 In the case of light source modules, it shall be checked that:
 5.3.1.
 The design of the light source module(s) shall be such as:
 (a)
 that each light source module can only be fitted in no other position that the designated and correct one and can only be removed with the use of tool(s);
 (b)
 If there are more than one light source module used in the housing for a device, light source modules having different characteristics can not be interchanged within the same lamp housing.
 5.3.2.
 The light source module(s) shall be tamperproof.
 5.4.
 In the case of replaceable filament lamp(s):
 5.4.1.
 Any category or categories of filament lamp(s) approved according to Regulation No 37 may be used, provided that no restriction on the use is made in Regulation No 37 and its series of amendments in force at the time of application for type approval.
 5.4.2.
 The design of the device shall be such that the filament lamp can be fixed in no other position but the correct one.
 5.4.3.
 The filament lamp holder shall conform to the characteristics given in IEC Publication 60061. The holder data sheet relevant to the category of filament lamp used, applies.
 6. INTENSITY OF LIGHT EMITTED
 6.1.
 The intensity of the light emitted by each of the two samples shall be not less than the minima and not greater than the maxima specified below and shall be measured in relation to the axis of reference in the directions shown below (expressed in degrees of angle with the axis of reference).
 6.2.
 The intensity along the axis of reference shall be not less than 80 candelas.
 6.3.
 The intensity of the light emitted in all directions in which the light can be observed shall not exceed:
 300 candelas in directions in or above the horizontal plane;
 and, in directions below the horizontal plane:
 600 candelas between h-h and 5° D and
 8 000 candelas below 5° D.
 6.4.
 In every other direction of measurement shown in Annex 3 to this Regulation, the luminous intensity shall be not less than the minima specified in that annex.
 However, in the case where the reversing lamp is intended to be installed on a vehicle exclusively in a pair of devices, the photometric intensity may be verified only up to an angle of 30° inwards where a photometric value of at least 25 cd shall be satisfied.
 This condition shall be clearly explained in the application for approval and relating documents (see paragraph 2 of this Regulation).
 Moreover, in the case where the type approval will be granted applying the condition above, a statement in paragraph 11 ‘Comments’ of the communication form (see Annex 1 to this Regulation), will inform that the device shall only be installed in a pair.
 6.5.
 In the case of a single lamp containing more than one light source, the lamp shall comply with the minimum intensity required when any one light source has failed and when all light sources are illuminated the maximum intensities shall not be exceeded. A group of light sources, wired so that the failure of any one of them causes all of them to stop emitting light, shall be considered to be one light source.
 7. TEST PROCEDURES
 7.1.
 All measurements, photometric and colorimetric, shall be made:
 7.1.1.
 In the case of a lamp with replaceable light source, if not supplied by an electronic light source control gear, with an uncolored standard filament lamp of the category prescribed for the device, supplied with the voltage necessary to produce the reference luminous flux required for that category of filament lamp.
 7.1.2.
 In the case of a lamp equipped with non-replaceable light sources (filament lamps and other), at 6,75 V, 13,5 V or 28,0 V respectively.
 7.1.3.
 In the case of a system that uses an electronic light source control gear, being part of the lamp (3) applying at the input terminals of the lamp the voltage declared by the manufacturer or, if not indicated, 6,75 V, 13,5 V or 28,0 V respectively.
 7.1.4.
 In the case of a system that uses an electronic light source control gear not being part of the lamp the voltage declared by the manufacturer shall be applied to the input terminals of the lamp.
 7.2.
 The Technical Service shall require from the manufacturer the light source control gear needed to supply the light source and the applicable functions.
 7.3.
 The voltage to be applied to the lamp shall be indicated in the communication form, specified in Annex 1 of this Regulation.
 7.4.
 For any lamp, except those equipped with filament lamps, the luminous intensities measured after one minute and after 30 minutes of operation, shall comply with the minimum and maximum requirements. The luminous intensity distribution after one minute of operation can be calculated from the luminous intensity distribution after 30 minutes of operation by applying at each test point the ratio of luminous intensities measured at HV after one minute and after 30 minutes of operation.
 7.5.
 The limits of the apparent surface in the direction of the reference axis of a light-signalling device shall be determined.
 8. COLOUR OF LIGHT EMITTED
 The colour of the light emitted inside the field of the light distribution grid defined at paragraph 2 of Annex 3 shall be white. For testing see Annex 4 to this Regulation. Outside this field no sharp variation of colour shall be observed.
 9. CONFORMITY OF PRODUCTION
 The conformity of production procedures shall comply with those set out in the Agreement, Appendix 2 (E/ECE/324-E/ECE/TRANS/505/Rev.2), with the following requirements:
 9.1.
 Lamps approved under this Regulation shall be so manufactured as to conform to the type approved by meeting the requirements set forth in paragraphs 6 and 8 above.
 9.2.
 The minimum requirements for conformity of production control procedures set forth in Annex 5 to this Regulation shall be complied with.
 9.3.
 The minimum requirements for sampling by an inspector set forth in Annex 6 to this Regulation shall be complied with.
 9.4.
 The authority which has granted type approval may at any time verify the conformity control methods applied in each production facility. The normal frequency of these verifications shall be once every two years.
 10. PENALTIES FOR NON-CONFORMITY OF PRODUCTION
 10.1.
 The approval granted in respect of a type of reversing lamp pursuant to this Regulation may be withdrawn if the foregoing requirements are not complied with or if the reversing lamp bearing the mark referred to in paragraphs 4.3.1 and 4.3.2 does not conform to the type approved.
 10.2.
 If a Contracting Party to the Agreement which applies this Regulation withdraws an approval it has previously granted, it shall forthwith so notify the other Contracting Parties applying this Regulation, by means of a communication form conforming to the model in Annex 1 to this Regulation.
 11. PRODUCTION DEFINITELY DISCONTINUED
 If the holder of the approval completely ceases to manufacture a type of reversing lamp approved in accordance with this Regulation, he shall so inform the authority which granted the approval. Upon receiving the relevant communication, that authority shall inform thereof the other Parties to the 1958 Agreement which apply this Regulation by means of a communication form conforming to the model in Annex 1 to this Regulation.
 12. NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF THE TECHNICAL SERVICES RESPONSIBLE FOR CONDUCTING APPROVAL TESTS, AND OF ADMINISTRATIVE DEPARTMENTS
 The Parties to the 1958 Agreement which apply this Regulation shall communicate to the United Nations secretariat the names and addresses of the Technical Services responsible for conducting approval tests and of the administrative departments which grant approval and to which forms certifying approval or extension or refusal or withdrawal of approval, or production definitely discontinued issued in other countries, are to be sent.
 (1) As defined in Annex 7 to the Consolidated Resolution on the Construction of Vehicles (R.E.3), (document TRANS/WP.29/78/Rev.1/Amend.2 as last amended by Amend.4).
 (2) 1 for Germany, 2 for France, 3 for Italy, 4 for the Netherlands, 5 for Sweden, 6 for Belgium, 7 for Hungary, 8 for the Czech Republic, 9 for Spain, 10 for Serbia, 11 for the United Kingdom, 12 for Austria, 13 for Luxembourg, 14 for Switzerland, 15 (vacant), 16 for Norway, 17 for Finland, 18 for Denmark, 19 for Romania, 20 for Poland, 21 for Portugal, 22 for the Russian Federation, 23 for Greece, 24 for Ireland, 25 for Croatia, 26 for Slovenia, 27 for Slovakia, 28 for Belarus, 29 for Estonia, 30 (vacant), 31 for Bosnia and Herzegovina, 32 for Latvia, 33 (vacant), 34 for Bulgaria, 35 (vacant), 36 for Lithuania, 37 for Turkey, 38 (vacant), 39 for Azerbaijan, 40 for The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, 41 (vacant), 42 for the European Community (Approvals are granted by its Member States using their respective ECE symbol), 43 for Japan, 44 (vacant), 45 for Australia, 46 for Ukraine, 47 for South Africa, 48 for New Zealand, 49 for Cyprus, 50 for Malta, 51 for the Republic of Korea, 52 for Malaysia, 53 for Thailand, 54 and 55 (vacant), 56 for Montenegro, 57 (vacant) and 58 for Tunisia. Subsequent numbers shall be assigned to other countries in the chronological order in which they ratify or accede to the Agreement Concerning the Adoption of Uniform Technical Prescriptions for Wheeled Vehicles, Equipment and Parts which can be Fitted and/or be Used on Wheeled Vehicles and the Conditions for Reciprocal Recognition of Approvals Granted on the Basis of these Prescriptions, and the numbers thus assigned shall be communicated by the Secretary-General of the United Nations to the Contracting Parties to the Agreement.
 (3) For the purpose of this Regulation ‘being part of the lamp’ means to be physically included in the lamp body or to be external, separated or not, from the lamp body but supplied by the lamp manufacturer as part of the lamp system.
 ANNEX 1
 COMMUNICATION
 (Maximum format: A4 (210 × 297 mm))
 ANNEX 2
 EXAMPLES OF ARRANGEMENTS OF APPROVAL MARKS
 Figure 1
 Marking for single lamps
 MODEL A
 Figure 2
 Simplified marking for grouped, combined or reciprocally incorporated lamps
 (The vertical and horizontal lines schematise the shape of the light-signalling device. These are not part of the approval mark)
 MODEL B
 MODEL C
 MODEL D
 Note: The three examples of approval marks, models B, C and D represent three possible variables for the marking of a lighting device when two or more lamps are part of the same assembly of grouped, combined or reciprocally incorporated lamps. This approval mark shows that the device was approved in the Netherlands (E4) under approval number 3333 and comprising:
 a retro-reflector of class IA approved in accordance with the 02 series of amendments to Regulation No 3,
 a rear direction indicator lamp of category 2a approved in accordance with the 01 series of amendments to Regulation No 6,
 a red rear position lamp (R) approved in accordance with the 01 series of amendments to Regulation No 7,
 a rear fog lamp (F) approved in accordance with Regulation No 38 in its original form,
 a reversing lamp (AR) approved in accordance with Regulation No 23 in its original form,
 a stop lamp with two levels of illumination (S2) approved in accordance with the 01 series of amendments to Regulation No 7.
 MODEL E
 Marking of independent lamps
 Figure 3
 Light source modules
 ANNEX 3
 PHOTOMETRIC MEASUREMENTS
 1. Measurement methods
 1.1.
 When photometric measurements are taken, stray reflections shall be avoided by appropriate masking.
 1.2.
 In the event that the results of measurements are challenged, measurements shall be taken in such a way as to meet the following requirements:
 1.2.1.
 the distance of measurement shall be such that the law of the inverse of the square of the distance is applicable;
 1.2.2.
 the measuring equipment shall be such that the angle subtended by the receiver from the reference centre of the light is between 10′ and 1°;
 1.2.3.
 the intensity requirement for a particular direction of observation shall be satisfied if the required intensity is obtained in a direction deviating by not more than one quarter of a degree from the direction of observation.
 1.3.
 In the case where the device may be installed on the vehicle in more than one or in a field of different positions the photometric measurements shall be repeated for each position or for the extreme positions in the field of reference axis specified by the manufacturer.
 2. Measuring points expressed in degrees of angle with the axis of reference and values of the minimum intensities of the light emitted
 TOP
 2.1.
 The direction H = O° and V = O° corresponds to the axis of reference. On the vehicle it is horizontal, parallel to the median longitudinal plane of the vehicle and oriented in the required direction of visibility. It passes through the centre of reference. The values shown in the table give, for the various directions of measurement, the minimum intensities in cd.
 2.2.
 If visual examination of a lamp appears to reveal substantial local variations of intensity, a check shall be made to ensure that no intensity measured between two of the directions of measurement referred to above is below 50 per cent of the lower minimum intensity of the two prescribed for these directions of measurement.
 3. Photometric measurement of lamps equipped with several light sources
 The photometric performance shall be checked:
 3.1.
 For non-replaceable light sources (filament lamps and other):
 with the light sources present in the lamp, in accordance with relevant subparagraphs of paragraph 7.1 of this Regulation.
 3.2.
 For replaceable filament lamps:
 when equipped with filament lamps at 6,75 V, 13,5 V or 28,0 V, the luminous intensity values produced shall be corrected. The correction factor is the ratio between the reference luminous flux and the mean value of the luminous flux found at the voltage applied (6,75 V, 13,5 V or 28,0 V). The actual luminous fluxes of each filament lamp used shall not deviate more than ± 5 per cent from the mean value. Alternatively a standard filament lamp may be used in turn, in each of the individual positions, operated at its reference flux, the individual measurements in each position being added together.
 ANNEX 4
 COLOUR OF WHITE LIGHT: CHROMATICITY COORDINATES
 For checking the colorimetric characteristics, a source of light at a colour temperature of 2 854° K corresponding to illuminant A of the International Commission on Illumination (ICI) shall be used.
 These colorimetric characteristics shall be measured under conditions described in paragraph 7 of this Regulation.
 However, for lamps equipped with non-replaceable light sources (filament lamps and other), the colorimetric characteristics should be verified with the light sources present in the lamp, in accordance with relevant subparagraphs of paragraph 7.1 of this Regulation.
 ANNEX 5
 MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR CONFORMITY OF PRODUCTION CONTROL PROCEDURES
 1. GENERAL
 1.1.
 The conformity requirements shall be considered satisfied from a mechanical and geometric standpoint, if the differences do not exceed inevitable manufacturing deviations within the requirements of this Regulation.
 1.2.
 With respect to photometric performances, the conformity of mass-produced lamps shall not be contested if, when testing photometric performances of any lamp chosen at random according to paragraph 7 of this Regulation, respectively:
 1.2.1.
 no measured value deviates unfavourably by more than 20 per cent from the values prescribed in this Regulation.
 1.2.2.
 If, in the case of a lamp equipped with a replaceable light source and if results of the test described above do not meet the requirements, tests on lamps shall be repeated using another standard filament lamp.
 1.3.
 The chromaticity coordinates shall be complied when tested under conditions of paragraph 7 of this Regulation.
 2. MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR VERIFICATION OF CONFORMITY BY THE MANUFACTURER
 For each type of lamp the holder of the approval mark shall carry out at least the following tests, at appropriate intervals. The tests shall be carried out in accordance with the provisions of this Regulation.
 If any sampling shows non-conformity with regard to the type of test concerned, further samples shall be taken and tested. The manufacturer shall take steps to ensure the conformity of the production concerned.
 2.1. Nature of tests
 Tests of conformity in this Regulation shall cover the photometric and colorimetric characteristics.
 2.2. Methods used in tests
 2.2.1.
 Tests shall generally be carried out in accordance with the methods set out in this Regulation.
 2.2.2.
 In any test of conformity carried out by the manufacturer, equivalent methods may be used with the consent of the competent authority responsible for approval tests. The manufacturer is responsible for proving that the applied methods are equivalent to those laid down in this Regulation.
 2.2.3.
 The application of paragraphs 2.2.1 and 2.2.2 requires regular calibration of test apparatus and its correlation with measurements made by a competent authority.
 2.2.4.
 In all cases the reference methods shall be those of this Regulation, particularly for the purpose of administrative verification and sampling.
 2.3. Nature of sampling
 Samples of lamps shall be selected at random from the production of a uniform batch. A uniform batch means a set of lamps of the same type, defined according to the production methods of the manufacturer.
 The assessment shall in general cover series production from individual factories. However, a manufacturer may group together records concerning the same type from several factories, provided these operate under the same quality system and quality management.
 2.4. Measured and recorded photometric characteristics
 The sampled lamp shall be subjected to photometric measurements for the minimum values at the points listed in Annex 3 and the required chromaticity coordinates.
 2.5. Criteria governing acceptability
 The manufacturer is responsible for carrying out a statistical study of the test results and for defining, in agreement with the competent authority, criteria governing the acceptability of his products in order to meet the specifications laid down for verification of conformity of products in paragraph 9.1 of this Regulation.
 The criteria governing the acceptability shall be such that, with a confidence level of 95 per cent, the minimum probability of passing a spot check in accordance with Annex 6 (first sampling) would be 0,95.
 ANNEX 6
 MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR SAMPLING BY AN INSPECTOR
 1. GENERAL
 1.1.
 The conformity requirements shall be considered satisfied from a mechanical and a geometric standpoint, in accordance with the requirements of this Regulation, if any, if the differences do not exceed inevitable manufacturing deviations.
 1.2.
 With respect to photometric performances, the conformity of mass-produced lamps shall not be contested if, when testing photometric performances of any lamp chosen at random according to paragraph 7 of this Regulation, respectively:
 1.2.1.
 no measured value deviates unfavourably by more than 20 per cent from the values prescribed in this Regulation.
 1.2.2.
 If, in the case of a lamp equipped with a replaceable light source and if results of the test described above do not meet the requirements, tests on lamps shall be repeated using another standard filament lamp.
 1.2.3.
 Lamps with apparent defects are disregarded.
 1.3.
 The chromaticity coordinates shall be complied when tested under conditions of paragraph 7. of this Regulation.
 2. FIRST SAMPLING
 In the first sampling four lamps are selected at random. The first sample of two is marked A, the second sample of two is marked B.
 2.1. The conformity is not contested
 2.1.1.
 Following the sampling procedure shown in Figure 1 of this annex the conformity of mass-produced lamps shall not be contested if the deviation of the measured values of the lamps in the unfavourable directions are:
 2.1.1.1.
 sample A
 A1:
 one lamp
 0 per cent
 one lamp not more than
 20 per cent
 A2:
 both lamps more than
 0 per cent
 but not more than
 20 per cent
 go to sample B
 2.1.1.2.
 sample B
 B1:
 both lamps
 0 per cent
 2.1.2.
 or, if the conditions of paragraph 1.2.2 for sample A are fulfilled.
 2.2. The conformity is contested
 2.2.1.
 Following the sampling procedure shown in Figure 1 of this annex the conformity of mass-produced lamps shall be contested and the manufacturer requested to make his production meet the requirements (alignment) if the deviations of the measured values of the lamps are:
 2.2.1.1.
 sample A
 A3:
 one lamp not more than
 20 per cent
 one lamp more than
 20 per cent
 but not more than
 30 per cent
 2.2.1.2.
 sample B
 B2:
 in the case of A2
 one lamp more than
 0 per cent
 but not more than
 20 per cent
 one lamp not more than
 20 per cent
 B3:
 in the case of A2
 one lamp
 0 per cent
 one lamp more than
 20 per cent
 but not more than
 30 per cent
 2.2.2.
 or, if the conditions of paragraph 1.2.2 for sample A are not fulfilled.
 2.3. Approval withdrawn
 Conformity shall be contested and paragraph 10 applied if, following the sampling procedure in Figure 1 of this annex, the deviations of the measured values of the lamps are:
 2.3.1.
 sample A
 A4:
 one lamp not more than
 20 per cent
 one lamp more than
 30 per cent
 A5:
 both lamps more than
 20 per cent
 2.3.2.
 sample B
 B4:
 in the case of A2
 one lamp more than
 0 per cent
 but not more than
 20 per cent
 one lamp more than
 20 per cent
 B5:
 in the case of A2
 both lamps more than
 20 per cent
 B6:
 in the case of A2
 one lamp
 0 per cent
 one lamp more than
 30 per cent
 2.3.3.
 or, if the conditions of paragraph 1.2.2 for samples A and B are not fulfilled.
 3. REPEATED SAMPLING
 In the cases of A3, B2 and B3 a repeated sampling, third sample C of two lamps and fourth sample D of two lamps, selected from stock manufactured after alignment, is necessary within two months’ time after the notification.
 3.1. The conformity is not contested
 3.1.1.
 Following the sampling procedure shown in Figure 1 of this annex the conformity of mass-produced lamps shall not be contested if the deviations of the measured values of the lamps are:
 3.1.1.1.
 sample C
 C1:
 one lamp
 0 per cent
 one lamp not more than
 20 per cent
 C2:
 both lamps more than
 0 per cent
 but not more than
 20 per cent
 go to sample D
 3.1.1.2.
 sample D
 D1:
 in the case of C2
 both lamps
 0 per cent
 3.1.2.
 or, if the conditions of paragraph 1.2.2 for sample C are fulfilled.
 3.2. The conformity is contested
 3.2.1.
 Following the sampling procedure shown in Figure 1 of this annex the conformity of mass-produced lamps shall be contested and the manufacturer requested to make his production meet the requirements (alignment) if the deviations of the measured values of the lamps are:
 3.2.1.1.
 sample D
 D2:
 in the case of C2
 one lamp more than
 0 per cent
 but not more than
 20 per cent
 one lamp not more than
 20 per cent
 3.2.1.2.
 or, if the conditions of paragraph 1.2.2 for sample C are not fulfilled.
 3.3. Approval withdrawn
 Conformity shall be contested and paragraph 10 applied if, following the sampling procedure in Figure 1 of this annex, the deviations of the measured values of the lamps are:
 3.3.1.
 sample C
 C3:
 one lamp not more than
 20 per cent
 one lamp more than
 20 per cent
 C4:
 both lamps more than
 20 per cent
 3.3.2.
 sample D
 D3:
 in the case of C2
 one lamp 0 or more than
 0 per cent
 one lamp more than
 20 per cent
 3.3.3.
 or, if the conditions of paragraph 1.2.2 for samples C and D are not fulfilled.
 Figure 1


text:
 12.1.2015
 RO
 Jurnalul Oficial al Uniunii Europene
 C 7/2
 Hotărârea Curții (Camera întâi) din 5 noiembrie 2014 (cerere de decizie preliminară formulată de Oberster Gerichtshof – Austria) – Österreichischer Gewerkschaftsbund/Verband Österreichischer Banken und Bankiers
 (Cauza C-476/12) (1)
 ((Trimitere preliminară - Politica socială - Acordul-cadru privind munca pe fracțiune de normă - Principiul nediscriminării - Convenție colectivă care prevede o alocație pentru creșterea copilului aflat în întreținere - Calculul alocației plătite lucrătorilor angajați pe fracțiune de normă potrivit principiului pro rata temporis))
 (2015/C 007/02)
 Limba de procedură: germana
 Instanța de trimitere
 Oberster Gerichtshof
 Părțile din procedura principală
 Reclamantă: Österreichischer Gewerkschaftsbund
 Pârâtă: Verband Österreichischer Banken und Bankiers
 Dispozitivul
 Clauza 4 punctul 2 din Acordul-cadru privind munca pe fracțiune de normă, încheiat la 6 iunie 1997, care este cuprins în anexa la Directiva 97/81/CE a Consiliului din 15 decembrie 1997 privind Acordul-cadru cu privire la munca pe fracțiune de normă, încheiat de UCIPE, CEIP și CES, astfel cum a fost modificată prin Directiva 98/23/CE a Consiliului din 7 aprilie 1998, trebuie interpretată în sensul că principiul pro rata temporis se aplică la calculul cuantumului unei alocații pentru creșterea copilului aflat în întreținere acordate de angajator, în temeiul unei convenții colective precum cea aplicabilă lucrătorilor din bănci și bancherilor austrieci, unui lucrător pe fracțiune de normă.
 (1) JO C 32, 2.2.2013.


text:
 5.6.2010
 SL
 Uradni list Evropske unije
 C 148/47
 Tožba, vložena 8. aprila 2010 – Longevity Health Products proti UUNT – Tecnifar (E-PLEX)
 (Zadeva T-161/10)
 2010/C 148/77
 Jezik, v katerem je bila tožba vložena: angleščina
 Stranke
 Tožeča stranka: Longevity Health Products, Inc. (Nassau, Bahami) (zastopnik: J. Korab, odvetnik)
 Tožena stranka: Urad za usklajevanje na notranjem trgu (znamke in modeli)
 Druga stranka pred odborom za pritožbe: Tecnifar – Industria Tecnica Farmaceutica, SA (Lizbona, Portugalska)
 Predlogi tožeče stranke
 —
 Naj se tožbo razglasi za dopustno;
 —
 naj se odločbo četrtega odbora za pritožbe Urada za usklajevanje na notranjem trgu (znamke in modeli) z dne 5. februarja 2010 v zadevi R 662/2009-4 razveljavi in zavrne ugovor, ki ga je vložila druga stranka v postopku pred odborom za pritožbe in se nanaša na farmacevtske in veterinarske medicinske proizvode, razen medicinskih proizvodov proti boleznim osrednjega živčnega sistema; in
 —
 naj se toženi stranki naloži plačilo stroškov.
 Tožbeni razlogi in bistvene trditve
 Prijavitelj znamke Skupnosti: Tožeča stranka
 Zadevna znamka Skupnosti: Besedna znamka „E-PLEX“ za proizvode in storitve iz razredov 3, 5 in 35
 Imetnik znamke ali znaka, navajanega v postopku z ugovorom: Druga stranka pred odborom za pritožbe
 Znamka ali znak, navajan v postopku z ugovorom: Registracija portugalske besedne znamke „EPILEX“ za proizvode iz razreda 5
 Odločba oddelka za ugovore: Delna ugoditev ugovoru
 Odločba odbora za pritožbe: Delna zavrnitev pritožbe
 Navajani tožbeni razlogi: Kršitev člena 8(1)(b) Uredbe Sveta št. 207/2009, ker je odbor za pritožbe nepravilno ugotovil verjetnost zmede med zadevnima znamkama.


text:
3.4.2004 EL Επίσημη Εφημερίδα της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης C 85/21
 Λόγοι ακυρώσεως και κύρια επιχειρήματα ∆ικαστηρίου των Ευρωπαϊκών Κοινοτήτων προσφυγή κατά του
 Βασιλείου του Βελγίου.
 Η προθεσμία που τάχθηκε για τη μεταφορά της εν λόγω οδηγίας
 στην εσωτερική έννομη τάξη έληξε στις 20 Απριλίου 2003. H Επιτροπή των Ευρωπαϊκών Κοινοτήτων ζητεί από το ∆ικαστήριο:
 1. να διαπιστώσει ότι το Βασίλειο του Βελγίου, παραλείποντας
 (1) EE L 110, σ. 28. να θεσπίσει τις αναγκαίες νομοθετικές, κανονιστικές και
 διοικητικές διατάξεις προκειμένου να συμμορφωθεί προς την
 οδηγία 2001/17/EK του Ευρωπαϊκού Κοινοβουλίου και του
 Συμβουλίου, της 19ης Μαρτίου 2001, για την εξυγίανση
 και την εκκαθάριση των ασφαλιστικών επιχειρήσεων (1) και,
 εν πάση περιπτώσει, παραλείποντας να κοινοποιήσει τις
 Προσφυγή της Επιτροπής των Ευρωπαϊκών Κοινοτήτων κατά διατάξεις αυτές στην Επιτροπή, παρέβη τις υποχρεώσεις που
 του Βασιλείου του Βελγίου, που ασκήθηκε στις 23 Φεβρουα- υπέχει από την εν λόγω οδηγία·
 ρίου 2004
 2. να καταδικάσει το Βασίλειο του Βελγίου στα δικαστικά έξοδα.
 (Υπόθεση C-87/04)
 (2004/C 85/40) Λόγοι ακυρώσεως και κύρια επιχειρήματα
 Η προθεσμία που τάχθηκε για τη μεταφορά της εν λόγω οδηγίας
 Η Επιτροπή των Ευρωπαϊκών Κοινοτήτων, εκπροσωπούμενη από στην εσωτερική έννομη τάξη έληξε στις 20 Απριλίου 2003.
 τον Ε. Traversa και την P. Léouffre, με τόπο επιδόσεων στο
 Λουξεμβούργο, άσκησε στις 23 Φεβρουαρίου 2004 ενώπιον του (1) EE L 110, σ. 28.