type: contracts

jurisdiction: EU

text:
 17.7.2014
 CS
 Úřední věstník Evropské unie
 L 211/32
 ROZHODNUTÍ SMÍŠENÉHO VÝBORU EHP
 č. 22/2014
 ze dne 14. února 2014,
 kterým se mění příloha XIII (Doprava) Dohody o EHP
 SMÍŠENÝ VÝBOR EHP,
 s ohledem na Dohodu o Evropském hospodářském prostoru (dále jen „Dohoda o EHP“), a zejména na článek 98 této dohody,
 vzhledem k těmto důvodům:
 (1)
 Směrnice Evropského parlamentu a Rady 2013/38/EU ze dne 12. srpna 2013, kterou se mění směrnice 2009/16/ES o státní přístavní inspekci (1), má být začleněna do Dohody o EHP.
 (2)
 Příloha XIII Dohody o EHP by proto měla být odpovídajícím způsobem změněna,
 PŘIJAL TOTO ROZHODNUTÍ:
 Článek 1
 V bodě 56b (směrnice Evropského parlamentu a Rady 2009/16/ES) přílohy XIII Dohody o EHP se doplňují nová slova a nová odrážka, které znějí:
 „, ve znění:
 —
 32013 L 0038: směrnice Evropského parlamentu a Rady 2013/38/EU ze dne 12. srpna 2013 (Úř. věst. L 218, 14.8.2013, s. 1).“
 Článek 2
 Znění směrnice 2013/38/EU v islandském a norském jazyce, která mají být zveřejněna v dodatku EHP Úředního věstníku Evropské unie, jsou platná.
 Článek 3
 Toto rozhodnutí vstupuje v platnost dnem 15. února 2014 za předpokladu, že jsou učiněna veškerá oznámení podle čl. 103 odst. 1 Dohody o EHP (2).
 Článek 4
 Toto rozhodnutí bude zveřejněno v oddíle EHP a v dodatku EHP Úředního věstníku Evropské unie.
 V Bruselu dne 14. února 2014.
 Za Smíšený výbor EHP
 předseda
 Gianluca GRIPPA
 (1) Úř. věst. L 218, 14.8.2013, s. 1.
 (2) Nebyly oznámeny žádné ústavní požadavky.


type: legislation

text:
 10.12.2020
 SL
 Uradni list Evropske unije
 L 415/39
 IZVEDBENA UREDBA KOMISIJE (EU) 2020/2016
 z dne 9. decembra 2020
 o spremembi Priloge II k Izvedbeni uredbi (EU) št. 577/2013 glede vnosov za Združeno kraljestvo, Guernsey, Otok Man in Jersey
 (Besedilo velja za EGP)
 EVROPSKA KOMISIJA JE –
 ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije,
 ob upoštevanju Uredbe (EU) št. 576/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 12. junija 2013 o netrgovskih premikih hišnih živali in razveljavitvi Uredbe (ES) št. 998/2003 (1) ter zlasti člena 13(2) Uredbe,
 ob upoštevanju naslednjega:
 (1)
 Uredba (EU) št. 576/2013 določa zahteve v zvezi z zdravstvenim varstvom živali, ki se uporabljajo za netrgovske premike hišnih živali v državo članico. Zlasti člen 13 navedene uredbe določa, da mora Komisija sprejeti dva seznama ozemelj in tretjih držav, iz katerih se lahko hišne živali s seznama v delu A Priloge I k navedeni uredbi, namreč psi, mačke in beli dihurji, lahko premikajo v državo članico za netrgovske namene.
 (2)
 Pogoji za netrgovske premike hišnih živali v državo članico se razlikujejo glede na razmere na ozemlju ali v tretji državi izvora. Ob upoštevanju njihovega posebnega položaja se lahko tretje države ali ozemlja uvrstijo na seznam v skladu s členom 13(1) ali (2) Uredbe (EU) št. 576/2013.
 (3)
 V delu 2 Priloge II k Izvedbeni uredbi Komisije (EU) št. 577/2013 (2) je določen seznam ozemelj in tretjih držav iz člena 13(2) Uredbe (EU) št. 576/2013.
 (4)
 Glede na to, da se prehodno obdobje iz Sporazumom o izstopu Združenega kraljestva Velika Britanija in Severna Irska iz Evropske unije in Evropske skupnosti za atomsko energijo (v nadaljnjem besedilu: sporazum o izstopu) konča 31. decembra 2020, je Združeno kraljestvo Komisiji predložilo vlogo za uvrstitev na seznam, skupaj s kronsko odvisnimi ozemlji Guernsey, Otok Man in Jersey, v Prilogi II k Izvedbeni uredbi (EU) št. 577/2013. Komisija je vlogo ocenila in preverila, da Združeno kraljestvo ter kronsko odvisna ozemlja Guernsey, Otok Man in Jersey v zvezi z domačimi živalmi s seznama v delu A Priloge I k Uredbi (EU) št. 576/2013 izpolnjujejo merila iz člena 13(2) Uredbe (EU) št. 576/2013 in bi jih bilo zato treba uvrstiti na seznam v delu 2 Priloge II k Izvedbeni uredbi (EU) št. 577/2013, brez poseganja v uporabo prava Unije za Združeno kraljestvo in v njem v zvezi s Severno Irsko v skladu s členom 5(4) Protokola o Irski/Severni Irski k sporazumu o izstopu v povezavi s Prilogo 2 k navedenemu protokolu.
 (5)
 Del 2 Priloge II k Izvedbeni uredbi (EU) št. 577/2013 bi bilo zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
 (6)
 Ker se prehodno obdobje iz sporazuma o izstopu konča 31. decembra 2020, bi se morala ta uredba uporabljati od 1. januarja 2021.
 (7)
 Ukrepi iz te uredbe so v skladu z mnenjem Stalnega odbora za rastline, živali, hrano in krmo –
 SPREJELA NASLEDNJO UREDBO:
 Člen 1
 Del 2 Priloge II k Izvedbeni uredbi (EU) št. 577/2013 se nadomesti z besedilom iz Priloge k tej uredbi.
 Člen 2
 Ta uredba začne veljati tretji dan po objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
 Uporablja se od 1. januarja 2021.
 Ta uredba je v celoti zavezujoča in se neposredno uporablja v vseh državah članicah.
 V Bruslju, 9. decembra 2020
 Za Komisijo
 Predsednica
 Ursula VON DER LEYEN
 (1) UL L 178, 28.6.2013, str. 1.
 (2) Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 577/2013 z dne 28. junija 2013 o vzorcih identifikacijskih dokumentov za netrgovske premike psov, mačk in belih dihurjev, o sestavi seznamov ozemelj in tretjih držav ter o zahtevah glede formata, oblike in jezika izjav, ki potrjujejo izpolnjevanje nekaterih pogojev iz Uredbe (EU) št. 576/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta (UL L 178, 28.6.2013, str. 109).
 PRILOGA
 „DEL 2
 Seznam ozemelj in tretjih držav iz člena 13(2) Uredbe (EU) št. 576/2013
 Oznaka ISO
 Ozemlje ali tretja država
 Vključena ozemlja
 AC
 Otok Ascension
 AE
 Združeni arabski emirati
 AG
 Antigva in Barbuda
 AR
 Argentina
 AU
 Avstralija
 AW
 Aruba
 BA
 Bosna in Hercegovina
 BB
 Barbados
 BH
 Bahrajn
 BM
 Bermudi
 BQ
 Bonaire, Sint Eustatius in Saba (otoki BES)
 BY
 Belorusija
 CA
 Kanada
 CL
 Čile
 CW
 Curaçao
 FJ
 Fidži
 FK
 Falklandski otoki
 GB
 Združeno kraljestvo (*1)
 GG
 Guernsey
 HK
 Hongkong
 IM
 Otok Man
 JM
 Jamajka
 JP
 Japonska
 JE
 Jersey
 KN
 Sveti Krištof in Nevis
 KY
 Kajmanski otoki
 LC
 Sveta Lucija
 MS
 Monserat
 MK
 Severna Makedonija
 MU
 Mavricij
 MX
 Mehika
 MY
 Malezija
 NC
 Nova Kaledonija
 NZ
 Nova Zelandija
 PF
 Francoska Polinezija
 PM
 Saint Pierre in Miquelon
 RU
 Rusija
 SG
 Singapur
 SH
 Sveta Helena
 SX
 Sveti Martin
 TT
 Trinidad in Tobago
 TW
 Tajvan
 US
 Združene države Amerike
 AS – Ameriška Samoa
 GU – Guam
 MP – Severni Marianski otoki
 PR – Portoriko
 VI – Deviški otoki Združenih držav Amerike
 VC
 Sveti Vincencij in Grenadine
 VG
 Britanski Deviški otoki
 VU
 Vanuatu
 WF
 Wallis in Futuna
 (*1) V skladu s Sporazumom o izstopu Združenega kraljestva Velika Britanija in Severna Irska iz Evropske unije in Evropske skupnosti za atomsko energijo, zlasti členom 5(4) Protokola o Irski/Severni Irski v povezavi s Prilogo 2 k navedenemu protokolu, za namene te priloge sklicevanja na Združeno kraljestvo ne vključujejo Severne Irske.“


type: caselaw

text:
 10.3.2007
 SL
 Uradni list Evropske unije
 C 56/3
 Sodba Sodišča (prvi senat) z dne 25. januarja 2007 — Salzgitter Mannesmann GmbH, prej Mannesmannröhren-Werke GmbH proti Komisiji Evropskih skupnosti
 (Zadeva C-411/04 P) (1)
 (Pritožba - Konkurenca - Omejevalni sporazum - Trg brezšivnih jeklenih cevi - Pošteno sojenje - Dokazi anonimnega izvora - Globa - Sodelovanje - Enako obravnavanje)
 (2007/C 56/05)
 Jezik postopka: nemščina
 Stranki
 Pritožnica: Salzgitter Mannesmann GmbH, prej Mannesmannröhren-Werke GmbH (zastopnika: M. Klusmann in F. Wiemer, Rechtsanwälte)
 Druga stranka v postopku: Komisija Evropskih skupnosti (zastopniki: A. Whelan in H. Gading, zastopnika, H.-J. Freund, Rechtsanwalt)
 Predmet
 Pritožba zoper sodbo Sodišča prve stopnje (drugi senat) z dne 8. julija 2004 v zadevi Mannesmannröhren-Werke proti Komisiji (T-44/00) v delu, v katerem je zavrnilo njeno tožbo, ki jo je vložila zoper Odločbo Komisije 2003/382/ES z dne 8. decembra 1999 v zvezi s postopkom na podlagi člena 81 Pogodbe ES (zadeva IV/E-1/35.860-B — Brezšivne jeklene cevi) (UL L 140, str. 1) — Pravica do poštenega sojenja — Nepravilna uporaba člena 81 ES — Načelo enakega obravnavanja.
 Izrek
 1)
 Pritožba se zavrne.
 2)
 Salzgitter Mannesmann GmbH se naloži plačilo stroškov.
 (1) UL C 273, 6.11.2004.


text:
 28.4.2014
 HR
 Službeni list Europske unije
 C 129/13
 Zahtjev za prethodnu odluku koji je 10. veljače 2014. uputio tribunal du travail de Nivelles (Belgija) – Charlotte Rosselle protiv Institut national d'assurance maladie-invalidité (INAMI), Union nationale des mutualités libres (UNM Libres)
 (Predmet C-65/14)
 2014/C 129/16
 Jezik postupka: francuski
 Sud koji je uputio zahtjev
 Tribunal du travail de Nivelles
 Stranke glavnog postupka
 Tužitelj: Charlotte Rosselle
 Tuženici: Institut national d'assurance maladie-invalidité (INAMI), Union nationale des mutualités libres (UNM Libres)
 Svojevoljan intervenijent: Institut pour l'Egalité des Femmes et des Hommes (IEFH)
 Prethodno pitanje
 Krši li Kraljevska odluka od 3. srpnja 1996. o provedbi zakona o obveznom zdravstvenom osiguranju i naknadama, koordiniranog 14. srpnja 1994. u glavi III, poglavlju III, odjeljcima 1. i 2. time što ne predviđa izuzeće od probnog roka statutarne djelatnice kojoj je dodijeljen status mirovanja iz osobnih razloga i koja je na rodiljnom dopustu, dok je to slučaj sa statutarnim djelatnikom koji je podnio ostavku ili mu je dan otkaz, Direktivu Vijeća 92/85/EEZ od 19. listopada 1992. o uvođenju mjera za poticanje poboljšanja sigurnosti i zdravlja na radu trudnih radnica te radnica koje su nedavno rodile ili doje (1) i Direktivu 2006/54/EZ Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća od 5. srpnja 2006. o provedbi načela jednakih mogućnosti i jednakog postupanja prema muškarcima i ženama u pitanjima zapošljavanja i rada (preinaka) (2)?
 (1) SL L 348, str. 1; SL, posebno izdanje na hrvatskom jeziku, poglavlje 5., svezak 4., str. 73.
 (2) SL L 204, str. 23.; SL, posebno izdanje na hrvatskom jeziku, poglavlje 5., svezak 1., str. 246.


text:
 |
 52014PC0378
 Pasiūlymas TARYBOS REGLAMENTAS kuriuo iš dalies keičiamos Tarybos reglamento (ES) Nr. 43/2014 nuostatos dėl sužvejojamų tam tikrų žuvų kiekio apribojimų /* COM/2014/0378 final - 2014/0193 (NLE) */
 AIŠKINAMASIS MEMORANDUMAS
 1. PASIŪLYMO
 APLINKYBĖS
 Tarybos reglamentu (ES) Nr. 43/2014[1] 2014 metams nustatytos
 tam tikrų žuvų išteklių ir žuvų išteklių grupių
 žvejybos galimybės, taikomos Sąjungos vandenyse žvejojantiems laivams
 ir kai kuriuose Sąjungai nepriklausančiuose vandenyse žvejojantiems
 Sąjungos laivams. Žvejybos galimybės jų galiojimo laikotarpiu
 paprastai keliskart iš dalies keičiamos.
 2. KONSULTACIJŲ SU
 SUINTERESUOTOSIOMIS ŠALIMIS IR POVEIKIO VERTINIMO REZULTATAI
 Netaikoma.
 3. TEISINIAI PASIŪLYMO
 ASPEKTAI
 Siūlomais pakeitimais siekiama iš dalies
 pakeisti minėtą reglamentą, kaip išdėstyta toliau.
 Remiantis Grenlandijos nustatyta sužvejoti
 leidžiamų žuvų dalimi ir Europos bendrijos ir Danijos
 Vyriausybės bei Grenlandijos Vietinės Vyriausybės žvejybos
 partnerystės susitarimu ir jo protokolu, Sąjungai tenka 7,7 %
 paprastųjų stintenių ICES V ir XIV parajonių Grenlandijos
 vandenyse BLSK. Tuo metu, kai toliau pateiktas pasiūlymas buvo
 išsiųstas priimti, dar nebuvo pateiktas nei Grenlandijos pasiūlymas,
 nei valstybių narių nuomonė apie jį. Todėl
 minėtas BLSK šiame pasiūlyme nurodytas santrumpa „pm“ (pro memoria),
 vietoj kurios skaičiai bus įrašyti po pasiūlymo priėmimo.
 Reglamente (ES) Nr. 43/2014 nurodytas
 neteisingas paprastųjų jūrinių ešerių kiekis, leidžiamas
 sužvejoti I ir II zonų tarptautiniuose vandenyse (19 300 t); jis
 neatitinka Žvejybos šiaurės rytų Atlante komisijos (NEAFC) nustatyto
 BLSK – 19 500 t. Šis BLSK negali būti pradėtas žvejoti iki
 2014 m. liepos 1 d., kaip nurodyta prie Sąjungos kvotos
 pateiktoje išnašoje, kurios koreguoti nereikia. Aptikta dar viena klaida,
 susijusi su juodųjų paltusų BLSK, taikomu V ir XIV zonų
 Grenlandijos vandenyse: Norvegijai, Farerų saloms ir kai kurioms
 valstybėms narėms paskirstyta Sąjungos kvota buvo 200 tonų
 didesnė nei faktiškai pasiūlyta Grenlandijos – 4665 tonos vietoj
 4465 tonų. Taip pat pataisyti kai kurie atlantinių skumbrių
 BLSK, taikomi IIIa ir IV zonose, taip pat IIa, IIIb ir c zonų ir 22–32
 pakvadračių Sąjungos vandenyse: pirma, Sąjungos kvota gali
 būti žvejojama Farerų salų vandenyse, antra, Farerų salos
 turėtų galėti dalį savo atlantinių skumbrių
 kvotos (46 850 tonų) sužvejoti tam tikruose ES rajonuose ir tai
 turėtų būti užfiksuota atitinkamoje lentelėje. Todėl
 turėtų būti pataisytas ir Sąjungos vandenų rajono,
 kuriame Farerų saloms gali būti leista žvejoti atlantines skumbres,
 aprašymas (Reglamento (ES) Nr. 43/2014 VIII priedas).
 Galiausiai, šiame pasiūlyme pateikiami
 pakeitimai dėl priemonių, susijusių su regioninėmis
 žvejybos valdymo organizacijomis, įgyvendinimo. 2012 m. 8-ojoje
 eilinėje sesijoje Vakarų ir vidurio Ramiojo vandenyno
 žuvininkystės komisija (WCPFC) priėmė išsaugojimo ir valdymo
 priemonę, pagal kurią draudžiama tam tikra su ilgapelekiais
 pilkaisiais rykliais (Carcharhinus longimanus) susijusi žvejybos veikla.
 9-ojoje eilinėje sesijoje WCPFC priėmė panašų su
 floridiniais šilkiniais rykliais (Carcharhinus falciformis)
 susijusį draudimą. Abu draudimai turėtų būti
 įgyvendinti Sąjungos teisėje.
 2014/0193 (NLE)
 Pasiūlymas
 TARYBOS REGLAMENTAS
 kuriuo iš dalies keičiamos Tarybos
 reglamento (ES) Nr. 43/2014 nuostatos dėl sužvejojamų tam tikrų
 žuvų kiekio apribojimų
 EUROPOS SĄJUNGOS TARYBA,
 atsižvelgdama į Sutartį dėl
 Europos Sąjungos veikimo, ypač į jos 43 straipsnio 3 dalį,
 atsižvelgdama į Europos Komisijos
 pasiūlymą,
 kadangi:
 (1) Europos bendrijos ir Danijos
 Vyriausybės bei Grenlandijos Vietinės Vyriausybės žvejybos
 partnerystės susitarime[2] ir jo protokole[3]
 numatyta Sąjungai skirti 7,7 % paprastųjų stintenių
 išteklių ICES V ir XIV parajonių Grenlandijos vandenyse bendro
 leidžiamo sužvejoti kiekio (BLSK);
 (2) Tarybos reglamente (ES)
 Nr. 43/2014[4]
 Sąjungai 2014 metams nustatyta nulinė paprastųjų
 stintenių išteklių tuose Grenlandijos vandenyse žvejybos kvota,
 taikytina iki 2014 m. balandžio 30 d.;
 (3) [Įrašyti datą]
 Grenlandijos valdžios institucijos Sąjungai pranešė, kad nustatytas [pm]
 tonų paprastųjų stintenių ICES V ir XIV parajonių
 Grenlandijos vandenyse BLSK, taikytinas nuo[įrašyti datą] iki [įrašyti
 datą]. Todėl turėtų būti nustatyta susijusi to
 laikotarpio [pm] tonų Sąjungos kvota;
 (4) būtina pataisyti I ir II
 zonų tarptautiniuose vandenyse taikomą paprastųjų
 jūrinių ešerių BLSK ir V bei XIV zonų Grenlandijos
 vandenyse taikomą juodųjų paltusų BLSK. Taip pat
 būtina pataisyti Šiaurės jūroje ir gretimuose vandenyse
 taikomą atlantinių skumbrių BLSK, kad būtų atsižvelgta
 į Sąjungos ir Farerų salų abipusės prieigos
 tvarką; be to, reikėtų atitinkamai pakoreguoti rajono, kuriame
 Farerų salų laivai gali žvejoti atlantines skumbres pagal žvejybos
 leidimus, aprašymą;
 (5) 8-ojoje eilinėje
 sesijoje Vakarų ir vidurio Ramiojo vandenyno žuvininkystės komisija
 (WCPFC) priėmė draudimą laivuose laikyti, perkrauti,
 sandėliuoti ar iškrauti ilgapelekius pilkuosius ryklius (Carcharhinus
 longimanus). 9-ojoje eilinėje sesijoje WCPFC priėmė
 panašų su floridiniais šilkiniais rykliais (Carcharhinus falciformis)
 susijusį draudimą. Abu draudimai turėtų būti
 įgyvendinti Sąjungos teisėje. pagal Tarybos reglamento (EB)
 Nr. 847/96[5]
 2 straipsnį reikėtų nustatyti išteklius, kuriems taikomos
 įvairios tame reglamente nurodytos priemonės;
 (6) Reglamente (ES)
 Nr. 43/2014 numatyti sužvejojamų žuvų kiekio apribojimai taikomi
 nuo 2014 m. sausio 1 d. Todėl šio reglamento nuostatos dėl
 sužvejojamų žuvų kiekio apribojimų iš principo taip pat
 turėtų būti taikomos nuo tos dienos. Toks taikymas atgaline data
 nepažeidžia teisinio tikrumo ir teisėtų lūkesčių
 principų, nes aptariamos žvejybos galimybės dar neišnaudotos.
 Tačiau draudimas žvejoti floridinius šilkinius ryklius WCPFC konvencijos
 rajone įsigalioja 2014 m. liepos 1 d. ir turėtų
 būti pradėtas taikyti nuo tos dienos. Atitinkamai ir pataisytas V ir
 XIV zonų Grenlandijos vandenyse galiojantis juodųjų paltusų
 BLSK turėtų būti taikomas nuo šio reglamento įsigaliojimo
 dienos, nes dėl jo sumažėja Sąjungos laivų žvejybos galimybės.
 Be to, atsižvelgiant į paprastųjų stintenių žvejybos sezoną
 šiame reglamente numatyti sužvejojamų šių išteklių žuvų
 kiekio apribojimai turėtų būti taikomi nuo [įrašyti
 datą];
 (7) kadangi tam tikrų
 sužvejojamų žuvų kiekių apribojimų pakeitimai turi
 įtakos Sąjungos laivų ekonominei veiklai ir veiklos žvejybos
 sezonu planavimui, šis reglamentas turėtų įsigalioti iš karto,
 kai tik bus paskelbtas;
 (8) Reglamentas (ES)
 Nr. 43/2014 turėtų būti atitinkamai iš dalies pakeistas,
 PRIĖMĖ ŠĮ
 REGLAMENTĄ:
 1 straipsnis
 Reglamento (ES) Nr. 43/2014 pakeitimai
 (1)
 Reglamente (ES) Nr. 43/2014 įterpiamas
 37a straipsnis:
 „37a straipsnis
 Ilgapelekiai pilkieji rykliai
 1. Draudžiama
 laikyti laive, perkrauti, sandėliuoti ar iškrauti bet kokias
 ilgapelekių pilkųjų ryklių (Carcharhinus longimanus)
 skerdenų dalis ar visas skerdenas.
 3. Atsitiktinai
 sužvejojus 1 dalyje nurodytų rūšių žuvis siekiama jų
 nesužaloti. Jos nedelsiant paleidžiamos.“
 (2)
 Įterpiamas 37b straipsnis:
 „37b straipsnis
 Floridiniai šilkiniai rykliai
 1. Draudžiama
 laikyti laive, perkrauti, sandėliuoti ar iškrauti bet kokias floridinių
 šilkinių ryklių (Carcharhinus falciformis) skerdenų dalis
 ar visas skerdenas.
 2. Atsitiktinai
 sužvejojus 1 dalyje nurodytų rūšių žuvis siekiama jų
 nesužaloti. Jos nedelsiant paleidžiamos.“
 (3)
 Reglamento (ES) Nr. 43/2014 IA priedas iš
 dalies keičiamas pagal šio reglamento I priede pateiktą tekstą.
 (4)
 Reglamento (ES) Nr. 43/2014 IB priedas iš
 dalies keičiamas pagal šio reglamento II priede pateiktą tekstą.
 (5)
 Reglamento (ES) Nr. 43/2014 VIII priedas iš
 dalies keičiamas pagal šio reglamento III priede pateiktą tekstą.
 2 straipsnis
 Įsigaliojimas
 Šis reglamentas įsigalioja kitą
 dieną po jo paskelbimo Europos Sąjungos oficialiajame leidinyje.
 1 straipsnio 2 dalis taikoma nuo 2014 m.
 liepos 1 d.
 1 straipsnio 3 ir 5 dalys ir II priedo c
 punktas taikomi nuo 2014 m. sausio 1 d.
 II priedo a punktas taikomas nuo [įrašyti
 datą].
 Šis reglamentas privalomas visas ir
 tiesiogiai taikomas visose valstybėse narėse.
 Priimta Briuselyje
 Tarybos
 vardu
 Pirmininkas
 [1] 2014 m. sausio 20 d. Tarybos reglamentas (ES)
 Nr. 43/2014, kuriuo 2014 metams nustatomos tam tikrų žuvų
 išteklių ir žuvų išteklių grupių žvejybos galimybės,
 taikomos Sąjungos vandenyse žvejojantiems laivams ir kai kuriuose
 Sąjungai nepriklausančiuose vandenyse žvejojantiems Sąjungos
 laivams (OL L 24, 2014 1 28, p. 1–145).
 [2] OL L 172, 2007 6 30, p. 4.
 [3] OL L 293, 2012 10 23, p. 5.
 [4] OL L 24, 2014 1 28, p. 1–145.
 [5] 1996 m. gegužės 6 d. Tarybos reglamentas
 (EB) Nr. 847/96, nustatantis bendrų leistinų sugavimų ir
 kvotų kasmetinio valdymo papildomas sąlygas (OL L 115, 1996 5 9, p. 3).
 PRIEDAI
 prie
 Pasiūlymo dėl Tarybos
 reglamento
 kuriuo iš dalies keičiamos
 Tarybos reglamento (ES) Nr. 43/2014 nuostatos dėl sužvejojamų
 tam tikrų žuvų kiekio apribojimų
 I PRIEDAS
 IA priedo įrašas, skirtas
 atlantinėms skumbrėms IIIa ir IV zonose, taip pat IIa, IIIb, IIIc
 zonų ir 22–32 pakvadračių Sąjungos vandenyse,
 pakeičiamas taip:
 „Rūšis: || Atlantinės skumbrės || || || Zona: || IIIa ir IV; IIa, IIIb, IIIc zonų ir 22–32 pakvadračių Sąjungos vandenys
 || Scomber scombrus || || || (MAC/2A34.) ||
 Belgija || || 768 || (2) (5) || Mokslinėmis rekomendacijomis pagrįstas BLSK. || ||
 Danija || || 26 530 || (2) (5) || || || ||
 Vokietija || || 800 || (2) (5) || || || ||
 Prancūzija || || 2 417 || (2) (5) || || || ||
 Nyderlandai || 2 434 || (2) (5) || || || ||
 Švedija || || 7 101 || (1) (2) (5) || || || ||
 Jungtinė Karalystė || 2 254 || (2) (5) || || || ||
 Sąjunga || || 42 304 || (1) (2) (5) || || || ||
 Norvegija || || 256 936 || (3) || || || ||
 Farerų salos || 46 850 || (4) || || || ||
 || || || || || || ||
 BLSK || || Netaikoma || || || || ||
 (1) Speciali sąlyga: įskaitant pm tonų, kurios turi būti sužvejotos Norvegijos vandenyse į pietus nuo 62° šiaurės platumos (MAC/*04N-): ||
 || || 247 || || || || ||
 || Taikant šią specialią sąlygą atlantinių menkių, juodadėmių menkių, sidabrinių polakų, paprastųjų merlangų ir ledjūrio menkių priegaudos turi būti įskaičiuojamos į šios rūšies kvotas.
 (2) Taip pat gali būti sužvejota IVa zonos Norvegijos vandenyse (MAC/*4AN.). || || ||
 (3) Turi būti išskaičiuota iš BLSK Norvegijos dalies (patekimo kvota). Į šį kiekį įskaičiuojama toliau nurodyta Šiaurės jūros BLSK Norvegijos dalis:
 || || 74 500 || || || || ||
 || Pagal šią kvotą galima žvejoti tik IVa zonoje (MAC/*04A.), išskyrus pm tonų, kurias galima sužvejoti IIIa zonoje (MAC/*03A.):
 || || 3 000 || || || || ||
 (4) Turi būti išskaičiuota iš BLSK Farerų salų dalies (patekimo kvota). Pagal šią kvotą galima žvejoti VIa zonoje į šiaurę nuo 56o30' šiaurės platumos (MAC/*6AN56). Pagal ją taip pat galima žvejoti IIa ir IVa zonose į šiaurę nuo 59o šiaurės platumos (ES zona) spalio 1 d.–gruodžio 31 d. (MAC/*24N59).
 (5) Gali būti žvejojama ir Farerų vandenyse, laikantis kiekvienos valstybės narės kvotos ir neviršijant šio bendro Sąjungai skirto kiekio (MAC/*FRO):
 || || 46 850 || || || || ||
 || || || || || || ||
 Speciali sąlyga: laikantis pirmiau minėtų kvotų ne didesnius nei nurodytieji toliau kiekius galima sužvejoti
 šiose zonose: || || || || || ||
 || IIIa || IIIa ir IVb, c || IVb || IVc || VI zona, IIa zonos tarptautiniai vandenys 2014 m. sausio 1 d.–kovo 31 d. ir 2014 m. gruodžio mėn. || ||
 || (MAC/*03A.) || (MAC/*3A4BC) || (MAC/*04 B.) || (MAC/*04C.) || (MAC/*2A6.) || ||
 Danija || 0 || 4 130 || 0 || 0 || 14 389 || ||
 Prancūzija || 0 || 490 || 0 || 0 || 0 || ||
 Nyderlandai || 0 || 490 || 0 || 0 || 0 || ||
 Švedija || 0 || 0 || 390 || 10 || 2 742 || ||
 Jungtinė Karalystė || 0 || 490 || 0 || 0 || 0 || ||
 Norvegija || 3 000 || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0“ || ||
 || || || || || || ||
 || || || || || || ||
 II PRIEDAS
 Reglamento (ES) Nr. 43/2014 IB priedas iš
 dalies keičiamas taip:
 (a) paprastosioms stintenėms V ir XIV zonų Grenlandijos vandenyse skirtas įrašas pakeičiamas taip:
 „Rūšis: || Paprastosios stintenės || || Zona: || V ir XIV parajonių Grenlandijos vandenys
 || Mallotus villosus || || (CAP/514GRN)
 Danija || pm || || Mokslinėmis rekomendacijomis pagrįstas BLSK.
 Vokietija || pm || || Reglamento (EB) Nr. 847/96 3 straipsnis netaikomas.
 Švedija || pm || || Reglamento (EB) Nr. 847/96 4 straipsnis netaikomas.
 Jungtinė Karalystė || pm || || ||
 Visos valstybės narės || pm || (1) || ||
 Sąjunga || pm || (2) || ||
 || || || ||
 BLSK || Netaikoma || || ||
 (1) Danija, Jungtinė Karalystė, Švedija ir Vokietija kvota „Visos valstybės narės“ gali pasinaudoti tik išnaudojusios savo kvotas. Tačiau valstybės narės, kurioms skirta daugiau kaip 10 % Sąjungos kvotos, kvota „Visos valstybės narės“ pasinaudoti negali.“
 || ||
 (b) juodiesiems paltusams V ir XIV zonų Grenlandijos vandenyse skirtas įrašas pakeičiamas taip:
 || || || ||
 Rūšis: || Juodieji paltusai || Zona: || V ir XIV parajonių Grenlandijos vandenys
 || Reinhardtius hippoglossoides || || (GHL/514GRN)
 Vokietija || 3 591 || || Mokslinėmis rekomendacijomis pagrįstas BLSK.
 Jungtinė Karalystė || 189 || || Reglamento (EB) Nr. 847/96 3 straipsnis netaikomas.
 Sąjunga || 3 780 || (1) || Reglamento (EB) Nr. 847/96 4 straipsnis netaikomas.
 Norvegija || 575 || || ||
 Farerų salos || 110 || || ||
 || || || ||
 BLSK || Netaikoma || || ||
 (1) Vienu metu gali žvejoti ne daugiau kaip šeši laivai. ||
 || || || ||
 (c) paprastiesiems jūriniams ešeriams I ir II zonų tarptautiniuose vandenyse skirtas įrašas pakeičiamas taip:
 || || || ||
 „Rūšis: || Paprastieji jūriniai ešeriai || || Zona: || I ir II zonų tarptautiniai vandenys
 || Sebastes spp. || || (RED/1/2INT)
 Sąjunga || Netaikoma || (1) (2) || Mokslinėmis rekomendacijomis pagrįstas BLSK.
 || || || Reglamento (EB) Nr. 847/96 3 straipsnis netaikomas.
 BLSK || 19 500 || || Reglamento (EB) Nr. 847/96 4 straipsnis netaikomas.
 (1) Gali būti žvejojama tik 2014 m. liepos 1 d. – gruodžio 31 d. NEAFC susitariančiosioms šalims visiškai išnaudojus BLSK, žvejyba bus uždrausta. Komisija valstybėms narėms praneša, kurią dieną NEAFC sekretoriatas pranešė NEAFC susitariančiosioms šalims, kad BLSK yra visiškai išnaudotas. Nuo tos dienos valstybės narės uždraudžia su jų vėliavomis plaukiojantiems laivams vykdyti specializuotąją paprastųjų jūrinių ešerių žvejybą.
 (2) Žvejodami kitų rūšių žuvis, laivai riboja gelminių ilgažiomenių ešerių priegaudą iki 1 % viso laive laikomo sugautų žuvų kiekio.“
 || || || ||
 III PRIEDAS
 „VIII PRIEDAS
 ES VANDENYSE ŽVEJOJANTIEMS
 TREČIŲJŲ ŠALIŲ LAIVAMS
 IŠDUOTŲ ŽVEJYBOS LEIDIMŲ KIEKYBINIAI APRIBOJIMAI
 Vėliavos valstybė || Žvejybos veikla || Žvejybos leidimų skaičius || Didžiausias vienu metu žvejojančių laivų skaičius
 Norvegija || Atlantinės silkės, į šiaurę nuo 62° 00' šiaurės platumos || 20 || 20
 Farerų salos || Atlantinės skumbrės VIa (į šiaurę nuo 56°30' šiaurės platumos), IIa ir IVa (į šiaurę nuo 59o šiaurės platumos) zonose Paprastosios stauridės IV, VIa (į šiaurę nuo 56°30' šiaurės platumos), VIIe, VIIf ir VIIh zonose || 14 || 14
 Atlantinės silkės į šiaurę nuo 62°00' šiaurės platumos || 21 || 21
 Atlantinės silkės IIIa zonoje || 4 || 4
 Norveginių menkučių industrinė žvejyba IV, VIa (į šiaurę nuo 56°30' šiaurės platumos) zonose (įskaitant neišvengiamą žydrųjų merlangų priegaudą) || 15 || 15
 Paprastosios molvos ir paprastosios brosmės || 20 || 10
 Žydrieji merlangai II, VIa (į šiaurę nuo 56°30′ šiaurės platumos), VIb ir VII (į vakarus nuo 12°00' vakarų ilgumos) zonose || 20 || 20
 Melsvosios molvos || 16 || 16
 Venesuela[1] || Rifiniai ešeriai (Prancūzijos Gvianos vandenys) || 45 || 45“
 [1] Kad būtų išduoti tie žvejybos leidimai, turi
 būti pateikta įrodymų, kad turima galiojanti prašymą
 išduoti žvejybos leidimą teikiančio laivo savininko ir
 Prancūzijos Gvianos departamente esančios perdirbimo įmonės
 sutartis, kurioje yra numatytas įsipareigojimas iš atitinkamo laivo
 iškrauti ne mažiau kaip 75 % viso sužvejoto rifinių ešerių
 kiekio tame departamente, kad rifinius ešerius būtų galima perdirbti
 tos įmonės gamykloje. Tokią sutartį turi patvirtinti
 Prancūzijos valdžios institucijos, kurios užtikrina, kad ši sutartis
 atitiktų tiek realų sutartį sudarančios perdirbimo
 įmonės pajėgumą, tiek Gvianos ekonomikos vystymosi tikslus.
 Prie prašymo suteikti žvejybos leidimą pridedama tinkamai patvirtintos
 sutarties kopija. Atsisakiusios patvirtinti tokią sutartį,
 Prancūzijos valdžios institucijos apie tokį atsisakymą
 informuoja atitinkamą šalį bei Komisiją ir nurodo jo priežastis.


type: wikipedia

text:
Google I/O is een jaarlijks terugkerende ontwikkelaarsconferentie van Google die plaatsvindt in San Francisco, Californië. De I en de O staan voor input/output, maar ook voor "Innovation in the Open". Onderwerpen die veel langskomen zijn Android, Chrome, Chrome OS, API's en de Google Web Toolkit. De conferentie kan worden vergeleken met de Worldwide Developers Conference van Apple.
 Geschiedenis
 2008
 In 2008 kwamen OpenSocial, App Engine, Android, API van Google Maps en de Google Web Toolkit voor. Sprekers waren onder andere: David Glazer, Alex Martelli, Steve Souders, Dion Almaer, Mark Lucovsky, Guido van Rossum, Jeff Dean, Chris DiBona en Josh Bloch.
 2009
 Belangrijke onderwerpen in 2009 waren Android, App Engine, Chrome, Web Toolkit, OpenSocial, AJAX-API's van Google en Google Wave. Aanwezigen kregen een gratis HTC Magic.
 2010
 Van 19 tot 20 mei kwamen de volgende onderwerpen aan bod: Android, App Engine, Chrome, Enterprise, Geo, API's van Google, Google TV, Google Web Toolkit, Sociale web en Google Wave.
 Op de conferentie waren meer dan 200 sprekers aanwezig. De HTC Evo 4G werd weggeven aan mensen in de zaal. Voordat de conferentie begonnen was kregen inwoners van de Verenigde Staten een Motorola Milestone, mensen uit andere landen een Nexus One.
 2011
 Op de eerste dag (10 mei) kreeg Android de volledige aandacht, op de tweede dag (11 mei) Chrome en Chrome OS. Voor Android werd onder andere Google Music en versie 4.0 van Android (Ice Cream Sandwich) aangekondigd.
 Op de volgende dag werd de Chromebook aangekondigd: laptops van Samsung en Acer die als besturingssysteem Chrome OS draaien. Ook een online versie van het spel Angry Birds werd gelanceerd, deze kan in de browser worden gespeeld. Aanwezigen kregen een Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1, een Chromebook van Samsung en een mobiele hotspot van Verizon cadeau.
 2012
 In 2012 werd de duur van de conferentie verlengd naar drie dagen in plaats van twee. De aanwezigen mochten een Galaxy Nexus, een Nexus 7, een Nexus Q en een Chromebox in ontvangst nemen.
 Eerste dag
 Op 27 juni kwamen de volgende onderwerpen aan bod: Android, Google+ en Google Glass. Ook werd er op deze dag een keynote gehouden. Daarin werd versie 4.1 van Android aangekondigd, samen met de Nexus 7 en de Nexus Q.
 Tweede dag
 Op 28 juni waren Chrome, de Cloud en Google Glass de onderwerpen. Ook vandaag was er weer een keynote. Een iOS-versie van Chrome werd aangekondigd.
 Derde dag
 Op de derde en laatste dag (29 juni) werd Google Analytics voor Android aangekondigd.
 Externe link
 Officiële website
 Google


text:
 Avis juridique important
 |
 22000D1109(26)
 ETA:n sekakomitean päätös N:o 71/1999, tehty 2 päivänä kesäkuuta 1999, yhteistyöstä muilla kuin neljän vapauden alaan kuuluvilla erityisalueilla tehdyn ETA-sopimuksen pöytäkirjan 31 muuttamisesta
 Virallinen lehti nro L 284 , 09/11/2000 s. 0059 - 0060
 ETA:n sekakomitean päätösN:o 71/1999,tehty 2 päivänä kesäkuuta 1999,yhteistyöstä muilla kuin neljän vapauden alaan kuuluvilla erityisalueilla tehdyn ETA-sopimuksen pöytäkirjan 31 muuttamisestaETA:N SEKAKOMITEA, jokaottaa huomioon Euroopan talousalueesta tehdyn sopimuksen, sellaisena kuin se on mukautettuna mainitun sopimuksen mukauttamisesta tehdyllä pöytäkirjalla, jäljempänä "sopimus", ja erityisesti sen 86 ja 98 artiklan,sekä katsoo seuraavaa:(1) Sopimuksen pöytäkirja 31 muutettiin 26 päivänä helmikuuta 1999 tehdyllä ETA:n sekakomitean päätöksellä N:o 27/1999(1).(2) Sopimuspuolten yhteistyö olisi aiheellista laajentaa koskemaan yhteisön toimintaohjelmaa pelastuspalvelun alalla neuvoston päätöksen 98/22/EY(2) mukaisesti.(3) Tämän vuoksi olisi muutettava sopimuksen pöytäkirja 31 edellä tarkoitetun laajennetun yhteistyön mahdollistamiseksi 1 päivästä tammikuuta 1998,ON PÄÄTTÄNYT SEURAAVAA:1 artiklaLisätään sopimuksen pöytäkirjan 31 olevaan 10 artiklaan (Pelastuspalvelu) kohdat seuraavasti:"5. EFTA-valtiot osallistuvat 8 kohdassa tarkoitettuun yhteisön toimintaohjelmaan 1 päivästä tammikuuta 1998.6. EFTA-valtiot osallistuvat 8 kohdassa tarkoitetun yhteisön toimintaohjelman rahoitukseen sopimuksen 82 artiklan 1 kohdan a alakohdan mukaisesti.7. EFTA-valtiot osallistuvat täysimääräisesti sen yhteisön komitean työskentelyyn, joka avustaa Euroopan yhteisöjen komissiota 8 kohdassa tarkoitetun yhteisön toimintaohjelman hallinnoimisessa, kehittämisessä ja täytäntöönpanossa.8. Tämä artikla koskee seuraavaa yhteisön säädöstä sekä siihen perustuvia säädöksiä:- 398 D 0022: neuvoston päätös 98/22/EY, tehty 19 päivänä joulukuuta 1997, yhteisön toimintaohjelmasta pelastuspalvelun alalla (EYVL L 8, 14.1.1998, s. 20)."2 artiklaTämä päätös tulee voimaan 3 päivänä kesäkuuta 1999, jos sopimuksen 103 artiklan 1 kohdan mukaiset ilmoitukset on tehty ETA:n sekakomitealle.Sitä sovelletaan 1 päivästä tammikuuta 1998.3 artiklaTämä päätös julkaistaan Euroopan yhteisöjen virallisen lehden ETA-osastossa ja ETA-täydennysosassa.Tehty Brysselissä 2 päivänä kesäkuuta 1999.ETA:n sekakomitean puolestaF. BarbasoPuheenjohtaja(1) EYVL L 148, 22.6.2000, s. 54.(2) EYVL L 8, 14.1.1998, s. 20.


type: other

jurisdiction: US

text: b" OFFICE OF\n INSPECTOR\n GENERAL\n UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE\n\n\n\n\n Limited Duty and Rehabilitation\n Employees Returned to Work\n\n Audit Report\n\n\n\n\n September 12, 2013\n\nReport Number HR-AR-13-006\n\x0c September 12, 2013\n\n Limited Duty and Rehabilitation Employees\n Returned to Work\n\n Report Number HR-AR-13-006\n\n\n\nBACKGROUND:\nU.S. Postal Service employees injured which is consistent with federal laws and\non the job are covered by the Federal regulations. However, we noted officials\nEmployees Compensation Act, which is did not perform the required periodic\nadministered by the U.S. Department of reviews of 3 percent of case files we\nLabor. The Postal Service manages reviewed, and 6 percent of the files\nefforts to return injured employees to reviewed did not contain documentation\nwork through its Injury Compensation indicating employees accepted modified\nProgram. As of December 2012, the assignments. Management stated these\nPostal Service had 16,999 employees issues were due to increased workload\nreceiving workers\xe2\x80\x99 compensation and decreased staffing.\nbenefits. To reduce these costs, the\nPostal Service began a return to work By not performing periodic reviews of\ninitiative focusing on employees employee case files, employees capable\nreceiving workers compensation. As of of working would continue receiving\nJune 2013, the Postal Service had workers compensation. Also, when\nreturned 2,098 employees to work; and supervisors do not document employees\nthe Postal Service and the Department acceptance of modified assignments,\nof Labor processed other actions for the employees could deny agreeing to\n1,790 employees that reduced workers the terms of the limited duty assignment,\ncompensation costs. increasing the potential for future claims.\n\nIn response to a request from the Office WHAT THE OIG RECOMMENDED:\nof General Counsel, our objective was We are not making any\nto determine whether Postal Service recommendations related to the issues\nofficials followed applicable policies and identified in this report as management\nprocedures when returning Limited Duty agreed in a prior audit to conduct a\nand Rehabilitation Employees to work. formal staffing analysis to determine the\n number and type of employees needed\nWHAT THE OIG FOUND: to handle workers\xe2\x80\x99 compensation claims\nOverall, Postal Service officials at the and adjust staffing accordingly.\nfour districts we visited (Lakeland,\nAtlanta, Dallas, and Chicago) followed Link to review the entire report\nthe established process to return injured\nemployees to work. When management\nreturned employees to work, they\nadhered to policies outlined in the\nEmployee and Labor Relations Manual,\n\x0cSeptember 12, 2013\n\nMEMORANDUM FOR: JEFFREY C. WILLIAMSON\n CHIEF HUMAN RESOURCES OFFICER AND\n EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT\n\n ROSEMARIE FERNANDEZ\n VICE PRESIDENT, EMPLOYEE RESOURCE\n MANAGEMENT\n\n\n\n\nFROM: Michael A. Magalski\n Deputy Assistant Inspector General\n for Support Operations\n\nSUBJECT: Audit Report \xe2\x80\x93 Limited Duty and Rehabilitation Employees\n Returned to Work (Report Number HR-AR-13-006)\n\nThis report presents the results of our audit of the U.S. Postal Service's Limited Duty\nand Rehabilitation Employees Returned to Work (Project Number 13YG016HR000).\n\nWe appreciate the cooperation and courtesies provided by your staff. If you have any\nquestions or need additional information, please contact Andrea Deadwyler, deputy\ndirector, Human Resources and Support, or me at 703-248-2100.\n\nAttachment\n\ncc: Corporate Audit and Response Management\n\x0cLimited Duty and Rehabilitation HR-AR-13-006\n Employees Returned to Work\n\n\n\n TABLE OF CONTENTS\n\n\nIntroduction ..................................................................................................................... 1\n\nConclusion ...................................................................................................................... 2\n\nPeriodic Reviews ............................................................................................................. 2\n\nModified Assignment Form .............................................................................................. 3\n\nAppendix A: Additional Information ................................................................................. 5\n\n Background............................................................................................................... 5\n\n Objective, Scope, and Methodology ......................................................................... 6\n\n Prior Audit Coverage................................................................................................. 8\n\x0cLimited Duty and Rehabilitation HR-AR-13-006\n Employees Returned to Work\n\n\n\nIntroduction\n\nThis report presents the results of our audit of the U.S. Postal Service's Limited Duty\nand Rehabilitation Employees Returned to Work (Project Number 13YG016HR000).\nThe report responds to a request from the U.S. Postal Service\xe2\x80\x99s Office of General\nCounsel due to a recent class action case that alleges violations of the Rehabilitation\nAct.1 Our objective was to determine whether Postal Service officials followed\napplicable policies and procedures when returning limited duty and rehabilitation\nemployees2 to work. See Appendix A for additional information about this audit.\n\nThe Postal Service implemented the Delivering Results, Innovation, Value, and\nEfficiency (DRIVE) initiatives to improve its business performance. One of the DRIVE\ninitiatives is to improve employee availability. This initiative includes a measurable\nmetric to reduce the number of employees on the periodic roll.3 As of December 2012,\nthe Postal Service had 16,999 employees on the periodic roll and was facing a long-\nterm workers\xe2\x80\x99 compensation liability of $16.5 billion. To reduce these costs, the\nPostal Service initiated an effort to return limited duty and rehabilitation employees on\nthe periodic roll to work in fiscal year (FY) 2013. As of June 2013, the Postal Service\nremoved 3,888 employees from the periodic roll either because management identified\na modified assignment within the employee\xe2\x80\x99s medical restrictions, or the employee\nreturned to full duty. Also included in this number are other actions processed by the\nPostal Service and the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) that reduced or discontinued\nworkers\xe2\x80\x99 compensation payments, such as divorce, change in dependent status,\ndisability separation, retirement, or death.\n\nThe Postal Service\xe2\x80\x99s policies and procedures for returning employees to work are\noutlined in the Employee Labor Relations Manual, which is consistent with federal laws\nand regulations.\n\n\n\n\n1\n The Rehabilitation Act prohibits discrimination against qualified employees and job applicants with disabilities in the\nfederal government, including the Postal Service.\n2\n Limited duty employees are temporarily unable to perform their regular assignment due to injuries sustained while\non duty. Rehabilitation employees have permanent partial disabilities resulting from injuries sustained while on duty.\n3\n Employees who receive workers\xe2\x80\x99 compensation benefits and have disabilities that are expected to be permanent or\nprolonged (more than 60-90 days).\n 1\n\x0cLimited Duty and Rehabilitation HR-AR-13-006\n Employees Returned to Work\n\n\n\nConclusion\n\nOverall, Postal Service officials at the four districts we visited (Lakeland, Atlanta, Dallas,\nand Chicago) followed the established process to return injured employees to work.\nWhen management returned employees to work, they adhered to policies outlined in the\nEmployee and Labor Relations Manual, which is consistent with federal laws and\nregulations. However, we noted that officials did not perform the required periodic\nreviews of 3 percent of case files we reviewed, and 6 percent of files reviewed did not\ncontain documentation of employees acceptance of modified assignments. District\nHealth and Resource Management (HRM) officials stated that it was an oversight due to\nincreased workload and decreased staffing, including retirements and promotions, that\nmade it difficult to manage cases for appropriate documentation.\n\nBy not performing periodic reviews of employee case files, employees capable of\nworking would continue receiving workers compensation. Also, when supervisors do not\ndocument employees acceptance of modified assignments, the employee could deny\nagreeing to the terms of the limited duty assignment, increasing the potential for future\nclaims.\n\nPeriodic Reviews\n\nDistrict HRM specialists performed periodic reviews for 134 of the 138 case files we\nreviewed (97 percent); however, we identified two case files in the Lakeland District and\none file each in the Chicago and Atlanta districts that did not contain evidence of\nrequired periodic reviews.\n\nFor example, a case file for a rural carrier in the Atlanta District, injured in February\n2006, had no evidence of a modified assignment form or periodic review from May 2009\nuntil December 2012. We found the employee's most recent medical report, dated May\n2009, stated that he could return to work with medical restrictions. However, it was not\nuntil January 2013, that a district HRM specialist performed a periodic review, and the\nemployee accepted a modified assignment in March 2013. Based on the employee's\nmedical report, he was able to return to work as early as May 2009.\n\nPostal Service guidelines require supervisors and managers to conduct periodic reviews\nof all employees working in temporary or limited duty assignments and all employees\nwho have received notice that there is no adequate work available within the\nemployee's medical restrictions.4\n\nDistrict HRM officials stated they did not perform all periodic reviews due to an\noversight. They further stated that increased workload and decreased staffing from\nretirements and promotions contributed to the oversight. As a result, employees capable\nof working remain on the periodic roll, and the Postal Service incurs unnecessary\nworkers' compensation costs.\n4\n Guidelines for Assignment of Limited Duty and Rehabilitation Employees, dated July 1, 2011.\n\n 2\n\x0cLimited Duty and Rehabilitation HR-AR-13-006\n Employees Returned to Work\n\n\n\nAlthough we identified one case file without evidence of a periodic review in the Chicago\nDistrict, officials explained that they have a process called the \xe2\x80\x9cBlue Room,\xe2\x80\x9d a\nmonitoring control worthy of consideration as a best practice throughout the\nPostal Service. This control, used to monitor absenteeism, also assists in returning\ninjured employees to work. The district, Human Resources, HRM, and Customer\nService Operations managers monitor all employees who are not actively working, and\nthey also include limited duty and rehabilitation employees. They meet once a month to\nreview the status of employees not actively working, which helps them manage their\nrequired periodic reviews. This practice could help other districts whose HRM\nspecialists are not able to keep up with periodic file reviews due to workload and staffing\nissues.\n\nModified Assignment Form\n\nWe determined that 59 of the 63 case files (94 percent) required and contained a\ncompleted Postal Service (PS) Form 2499, Offer of Modified Assignment.5 However,\nfour files at three6 districts we visited had no evidence that employees accepted the\noffer of modified assignment before returning to work. Two case files contained PS\nForms 2499 that did not document acceptance of modified assignments; while the\nremaining two case files did not contain completed PS Forms 2499.\n\nPS Form 2499 should list the duties and physical requirements of the modified\nassignment offered, with a copy submitted to the HRM office. If the employee has\nconcerns (for example: task, work location, or medical limitations) not addressed on the\nform, the supervisor or manager should discuss those concerns with the employee and\nif possible, suggest alternatives.7 Postal Service policy states that supervisors or\nmanagers are required to submit job offers with the employee's written acceptance or\nrefusal to the DOL\xe2\x80\x99s Office of Workers' Compensation Program.8\n\nDistrict officials cited various reasons for the missing or incomplete forms, including\nresource constraints and an instance in which they requested the completed form but\nnever received it from the employee. As a result, employees could deny agreeing to the\nterms of the limited duty assignment, increasing the potential for future claims.\nIn a previous audit,9 the U.S. Postal Service Office of Inspector General (OIG) found\nthat the HRM staff has been reduced without sufficient justification, such as a formal\nstaffing analysis. The OIG recommended, and management agreed to, conducting a\nformal staffing analysis to determine the number and type of employees needed to\nhandle workers\xe2\x80\x99 compensation claims, including district HRM specialists.\n\n\n\n\n5\n Sixty-three of the 138 case files we reviewed required a PS Form 2499.\n6\n Lakeland, Chicago, and Atlanta districts.\n7\n PS Form 2499, dated October 2007, Section III, Agreement and Signatures.\n8\n Handbook EL 505, Injury Compensation, Section 7.5.\n9\n Postal Service Injury Compensation Program, (Report Number HR-AR-13-004, dated July 25, 2013).\n\n 3\n\x0cLimited Duty and Rehabilitation HR-AR-13-006\n Employees Returned to Work\n\n\n\nWe are not making any recommendations related to the issues identified in this report\nas management agreed in a prior audit to conduct a formal staffing analysis to\ndetermine the number and type of employees needed to handle workers\xe2\x80\x99 compensation\nclaims and adjust staffing accordingly.\n\n\n\n\n 4\n\x0cLimited Duty and Rehabilitation HR-AR-13-006\n Employees Returned to Work\n\n\n\n Appendix A: Additional Information\n\nBackground\n\nPostal Service employees injured on the job are covered by the Federal Employees\nCompensation Act, which is administered by DOL. As of December 2012, the Postal\nService had 16,999 employees on the periodic roll and was facing a long-term workers\xe2\x80\x99\ncompensation liability of $16.5 billion.\n\nThe Postal Service has a legal responsibility to employees with job-related disabilities\nincluding the requirement to assign individuals to available work assignments within\ntheir work restrictions. Providing gainful employment within medically defined work\nrestrictions has proven to be in the best interest of employees and the Postal Service. In\nmany cases, returning to work has helped employees recover. Management provide a\nrehabilitation assignment when the effects of an injury are considered permanent and\nemployees have reached maximum medical improvement.10 Limited duty assignments\nare offered to employees whose medical conditions are considered temporary.\n\nTo reduce the number of employees on the periodic roll,11 the Postal Service\nimplemented an initiative in FY 2013, to return periodic roll employees to limited duty\nand rehabilitation assignments commensurate with their work restrictions. Return to\nwork actions have included providing modified assignments to employees within\ndocumented medical restrictions or returning employees to full duty. Other actions\nprocessed by the Postal Service and DOL that reduce or discontinue worker\xe2\x80\x99s\ncompensation payments are: divorce, changes in dependent status, disability\nseparation, retirement, or death. Based on these actions, as of June 2013, the Postal\nService has reduced periodic roll payments to 3,888 employees.\n\n\n\n\n10\n When an injured employee recovers, his or her recovery reaches a state in which the condition cannot be improved\nany further, or he or she reaches a treatment plateau in the healing process.\n11\n Postal Service Human Resources Office, Headquarters, provided a list of 3,888 employees on the periodic roll with\na return to work action as of June 2013.\n\n 5\n\x0cLimited Duty and Rehabilitation HR-AR-13-006\n Employees Returned to Work\n\n\n\nObjective, Scope, and Methodology\n\nOur objective was to determine whether Postal Service officials followed applicable\npolicies and procedures when returning limited duty and rehabilitation employees12 to\nwork. Our scope included case file reviews of 138 of 3,888 limited duty and\nrehabilitation employees with a return to work action as of June 2013. To accomplish\nour objective, we:\n\n\xef\x82\xa7 Identified and reviewed the laws and regulations as well as Postal Service policies\n and procedures for returning limited duty/rehabilitation employees to work.\n\n\xef\x82\xa7 Reviewed the FY 2013 national database13 of employees on the periodic roll eligible\n for the Postal Service's Return to Work Initiative, based on the employee's medical\n restrictions.\n\n\xef\x82\xa7 Judgmentally selected the Lakeland, Dallas, Atlanta, and Chicago districts for\n review. We selected the Lakeland, Atlanta, and Dallas districts because of their high\n number of limited duty and rehabilitation employees capable of returning to work.\n We selected the Chicago District because of its low number of limited\n duty/rehabilitation employees and high percentage of employees returned to work.\n\n\xef\x82\xa7 Interviewed Postal Service Headquarters HRM officials and personnel at selected\n districts to gain an understanding of the processes used to return limited duty and\n rehabilitation employees back to work.\n\n\xef\x82\xa7 Created a process flow of key actions involved in assigning limited duty and\n rehabilitation employees that was approved by a senior Postal Service official.\n\n\xef\x82\xa7 Reviewed 138 limited duty and rehabilitation employee case files (Lakeland \xe2\x80\x93 35,\n Dallas \xe2\x80\x93 36, Atlanta \xe2\x80\x93 36, and Chicago \xe2\x80\x93 31) to determine whether officials followed\n the established process to return limited duty and rehabilitation employees to work.\n The 138 files included 63 employees with modified assignments (PS Form 2499), 30\n employees returned to full duty, 20 employees who retired, eight employees who\n were deceased, and 17 employees with other actions taken. See Table 1 for a\n breakdown of case files reviewed by case type.\n\n\n\n\n12\n Limited duty employees are temporarily unable to perform their regular assignment resulting from injuries on duty.\nRehabilitation employees have permanent partial disabilities resulting from injuries on duty.\n13\n Postal Service Human Resources Office, Headquarters, provided a database listing of 16,999 employees on the\nperiodic roll, dated January 31, 2013, and eligible for return to work based on the employee's medical restrictions.\n\n 6\n\x0cLimited Duty and Rehabilitation HR-AR-13-006\n Employees Returned to Work\n\n\n\n\n Table 1. Action Types for Case Files Reviewed\n\n\n\n\n 17 or 12% Return to Work-Modified\n Assignment\n 8 or 6% Return to Work -Full Duty\n\n 63 or 46%\n Retired\n 20 or 14%\n\n Deaths\n\n\n 30 or 22% Other Actions\n\n\n\n\n Source: OIG fieldwork case file review at the Lakeland, Atlanta, Dallas, and Chicago districts.\n\nWe conducted this performance audit from January through September 2013 in\naccordance with generally accepted government auditing standards and included such\ntests of internal controls as we considered necessary under the circumstances. Those\nstandards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain sufficient, appropriate\nevidence to provide a reasonable basis for our findings and conclusions based on our\naudit objective. The evidence obtained provides a reasonable basis for our findings and\nconclusions based on our audit objective. We discussed our observations and\nconclusions with management on September 4, 2013, and included their comments\nwhere appropriate.\n\nWe did not rely on computer-generated data to support our conclusions and therefore\ndid not assess the reliability of any computer-generated data.\n\n\n\n\n 7\n\x0c Limited Duty and Rehabilitation HR-AR-13-006\n Employees Returned to Work\n\n\n Prior Audit Coverage\n\n Final\n Report Monetary Impact\n Report Title Report Number Date (in millions)\nPostal Service Injury HR-AR-13-004 7/25/2013 $171.6\nCompensation Program\nReport Results:\nManagement needs to improve their administration of workers' compensation claims.\nManagement did not consistently determine staffing levels and has reduced the number of\nstaff significantly since 2009. Additionally, some HRM personnel were used for collateral\nduties and nurses were not fully used in case management. We determined the Postal\nService can reduce the number of employees receiving workers' compensation and save\nmore than $85.5 million annually. We recommended management conduct a formal staffing\nanalysis to include using contract nurses for case management, establish district\nperformance measures based on cost reductions, and implement a nationwide work search\nsystem, along with district rehabilitation program committees. We also recommended\nmanagement establish a standardized quick reference guide, provide automated reminders\nof key tasks, explore the return-to-work benefits of partnerships with nonprofit\norganizations, and evaluate the use of predictive analytics. Management agreed with most\nof the recommendations but disagreed with the recommendations regarding automated\nreminders due to resource constraints and partnering with nonprofit organizations because\nthis action would not reduce the compensation payable to the employee.\n\nRehabilitation Assignments for HR-AR-12-004 8/27/2012 None\nEmployees Injured on Duty\nReport Results:\nThe Postal Service has contract work that it can potentially make available to employees\non the periodic roll as rehabilitation assignments. Specifically, we identified a contract that\nprovides automotive services including transporting vehicles in need of repair and\nmaintenance to 28 vehicle maintenance facilities (VMFs) or repair garages. We found that\nemployees who have been injured on the job and are able to return to work could perform\nsome of this work at 10 of the 28 Postal Service VMFs. The report also stated there is also\nthe potential for other VMFs to provide similar rehabilitation assignments. The report\nrecommended that management establish and implement a plan, including staffing and\ntraining, to allocate services performed at the 28 VMFs to employees injured on duty. We\nalso recommended management assess the feasibility of providing similar rehabilitation\nassignments at the remaining 281 VMFs. Management agreed with two of the three\nrecommendations. Management disagreed with the recommendation pertaining to\nestablishing a training plan for employees on the periodic roll who receive and accept an\noffer to perform vehicle shuttle service work.\n\n\n\n\n 8\n\x0c"


text:
 26.11.2005
 ET
 Euroopa Liidu Teataja
 C 296/3
 EUROOPA KOHTU
 (kolmas koda)
 6. oktoobri 2005. aasta otsus
 kohtuasjas C-291/03: (VAT and Duties Tribunal, Manchester (Ühendkuningriik) esitatud eelotsusetaotlus): MyTravel plc versus Commissioners of Customs & Excise (1)
 (Kuues käibemaksudirektiiv - Reisibüroode skeem - Pakettreisid - Kolmandatelt isikutelt ostetud teenused ja omateenused - Maksuarvutuse meetod)
 (2005/C 296/06)
 Kohtumenetluse keel: inglise
 Kohtuasjas C-291/03, mille esemeks on EÜ artikli 234 alusel VAT and Duties Tribunal, Manchester (Ühendkuningriik) 30. juuni 2003. aasta otsusega esitatud eelotsusetaotlus, mis saabus Euroopa Kohtusse 4. juulil 2003, menetluses MyTravel plc v. Commissioners of Customs & Excise, tegi Euroopa Kohus (kolmas koda), koosseisus: koja esimees A. Rosas, kohtunikud A. Borg Barthet (ettekandja), J.-P. Puissochet, S. von Bahr ja U. Lõhmus, kohtujurist: P. Léger, kohtusekretär: vanemametnik M. M. Ferreira, 6. oktoobril 2005 otsuse, mille resolutiivosa on järgmine:
 1.
 Reisibürool või reisikorraldajal, kes täitis maksustamisperioodi kohta käibedeklaratsiooni, kasutades siseriiklike õigusnormidega, millega võeti siseriiklikku õigusesse üle nõukogu 17. mai 1977. aasta kuues direktiiv 77/388 kumuleeruvate käibemaksudega seotud liikmesriikide õigusaktide ühtlustamise kohta ühine käibemaksusüsteem: ühtne maksubaas, ettenähtud arvutusmeetodit, on õigus teha ümberarvutusi käibemaksuvõla osas vastavalt Euroopa Kohtu poolt ühenduse õiguse kohaselt otsustatud arvutusmeetodile ja siseriiklikus õiguses ettenähtud tingimustele, mis peavad olema kooskõlas võrdsuse ja tõhususe põhimõtetega.
 2.
 Kuuenda direktiivi artiklit 26 tuleb tõlgendada nii, et reisibüroo või reisikorraldaja, kes paketi hinna eest osutab reisijale kolmandatelt isikutelt ostetud teenuseid ja omateenuseid, peab põhimõtteliselt eraldama paketist turuväärtusel põhineva omateenustele vastava osa siis, kui see väärtus on kindlaksmääratav. Sellisel juhul võib maksukohustuslane kasutada tegelike hindade kriteeriumi üksnes siis, kui ta tõendab, et see kriteerium kajastab usaldusväärselt paketi tegelikku koostist. Turuväärtuse kriteeriumi kohaldamisele ei esitata tingimust, et see peaks olema lihtsam kui tegelikel hindadel põhinev arvutusmeetod, samuti mitte tingimust, et sellega peaks kaasnema identne või sarnane käibemaksuvõlg, võrreldes sellega, mis oleks kaasnenud tegelikel hindadel põhineva arvutusmeetodi kasutamisega. Seetõttu:
 —
 reisibüroo või reisikorraldaja ei või kasutada turuväärtusel põhinevat arvutusmeetodit oma diskretsiooni kohaselt ja
 —
 viimast arvutusmeetodit kohaldatakse omateenustele, mille turuväärtus on kindlaksmääratav, isegi kui sama maksustamisperioodi raames paketi teatud oma koostisosade väärtust ei ole võimalik kindlaks määrata seetõttu, et maksukohustuslane ei müü analoogseid teenuseid paketist eraldi.
 3.
 Eelotsusetaotluse esitanud kohtu ülesanne on, põhikohtuasja asjaolusid arvesse võttes, kindlaks määrata põhikohtuasjas puhkusepakettide raames teostatud lennureiside turuväärtus. See eelotsusetaotluse esitanud kohus võib nimetatud turuväärtuse kindlaks määrata keskmistest väärtustest lähtudes. Antud kontekstis võib reisikorraldajate müüdud kohtadel põhinevat turgu vaadelda kui kõige kohasemat turgu.
 (1) ELT C 213, 6.9.2003.


text:
Is é is seoladh IP ("seoladh prótacal idirlín") ann ná seoladh uathúil a mbaineann gléasanna áirithe leictreonacha úsáid as lena chéile a aithint agus le cumarsáid a dhéanamh le chéile i ngréasán ríomhairí atá ag oibriú de réir an phrótacal idirlín (IP).
 Tá 4 bheart, nó 32 ghiotán i ngach seoladh IP, rud a chiallaíonn go bhfuil spás do 4,294,967,296 óstach (óstríomhaire) ar an Idirlíon. Cuirtear an seoladh IP in iúl mar cheithre fhigiúr a bhfuil poncanna eatarthu - mar shampla, "192.168.1.254".
 Gléas tábhachtach é an seoladh IP i ródú na ríomhairí. Faoi láthair, tá na seoltaí IP ag rith gann, agus mar sin, tá leagan nua den phrótacal ag teacht ar an bhfód a chuireann i bhfad níos mó seoltaí ar fáil dúinn.
 Idirlíon


text:
Πρόγραμμα Κοινωφελούς Χαρακτήρα 2018 - Κέντρο Δια Βίου Μάθησης Καινοτομία
 Πρόγραμμα Κοινωφελούς Χαρακτήρα 2018
 Οριστικά Αποτελέσματα(25/09/2018)
 Οριστικός Πίνακας Επιλαχόντων (Αρχείο Α”)
 Οριστικός Πίνακας Επιλαχόντων (Αρχείο Β”)
 Προσωρινά Αποτελέσματα(10/09/2018)
 Προσωρινός Πίνακας Επιλαχόντων (Αρχείο Α”)
 Προσωρινός Πίνακας Επιλαχόντων (Αρχείο Β”)
 Δόθηκε στη δημοσιότητα η Πρόσκληση Νο 8/2018, του ΟΑΕΔ για το πρόγραμμα: «Προώθηση της Απασχόλησης μέσω Προγραμμάτων Κοινωφελούς Χαρακτήρα Συμπεριλαμβανομένης και της Κατάρτισης των Συμμετεχόντων, σε Δήμους, Περιφέρειες και Κέντρα Κοινωνικής Πρόνοιας για 30.333 Θέσεις Πλήρους Απασχόλησης».
 η άμεση αντιμετώπιση της ανεργίας πληθυσμιακών ομάδων που συνεχίζουν να πλήττονται από την παρατεταμένη οικονομική κρίση
 αποβλέπει στην ενίσχυση της απασχόλησης των ανέργων στην ένταξη/επανένταξή τους στην αγορά εργασίας
 στην αναβάθμιση των παρεχόμενων προς τους πολίτες υπηρεσιών μέσω προγραμμάτων κοινωφελούς χαρακτήρα
 Οι υποψήφιοι ωφελούμενοι συμπληρώνουν και υποβάλουν αποκλειστικά με ηλεκτρονικό τρόπο από 01/08/2018 και ώρα 14:00 έως και 20/08/2018 και ώρα 12η μεσημβρινή, και ως ̟πιστοποιημένοι χρήστες των ηλεκτρονικών υπηρεσιών της διαδικτυακής ̟ύλης του Ο.Α.Ε.Δ., με τη χρήση των κωδικών πρόσβασης (Ονομασία Χρήστη και Συνθηματικό), την ειδική «ΑΙΤΗΣΗ ΣΥΜΜΕΤΟΧΗΣ ΣΤΗ ΔΙΑΔΙΚΑΣΙΑ ΚΑΤΑΡΤΙΣΗΣ ΤΟΥ ΠΙΝΑΚΑ ΚΑΤΑΤΑΞΗΣ ΑΝΕΡΓΩΝ ΓΙΑ ΤΗΝ ΠΡΟΩΘΗΣΗ ΤΗΣ ΑΠΑΣΧΟΛΗΣΗΣ ΜΕΣΩ ΠΡΟΓΡΑΜΜΑΤΩΝ ΚΟΙΝΩΦΕΛΟΥΣ ΧΑΡΑΚΤΗΡΑ ΣΥΜΠΕΡΙΛΑΜΒΑΝΟΜΕΝΗΣ ΚΑΙ ΤΗΣ ΚΑΤΑΡΤΙΣΗΣ ΤΩΝ ΣΥΜΜΕΤΕΧΟΝΤΩΝ, ΣΕ ΔΗΜΟΥΣ, ΠΕΡΙΦΕΡΕΙΕΣ ΚΑΙ ΚΕΝΤΡΑ ΚΟΙΝΩΝΙΚΗΣ ΠΡΟΝΟΙΑΣ ΓΙΑ 30.333 ΘΕΣΕΙΣ ΠΛΗΡΟΥΣ ΑΠΑΣΧΟΛΗΣΗΣ , και να επιλέξουν μία (1) μόνο ειδικότητα τοποθέτησης απ̟ό τις αναφερόμενες στη σχετική λίστα του Παραρτήματος Ι και α̟ό μία (1) μέχρι τρεις (3) Υπηρεσίες τοποθέτησης.
 Ωφελούμενοι της δράσης είναι Έλληνες πολίτες, πολίτες κρατών-μελών της ΕΕ, Βορειοηπειρώτες, ομογενείς και ομογενείς αλλοδαποί που προέρχονται από την Κωνσταντινούπολη και από τα νησιά Ίμβρο και Τένεδο, χωρίς να απαιτείται πιστοποιητικό ελληνικής ιθαγένειας, υπό την προϋπόθεση ότι η ιδιότητά τους ως Ελλήνων κατά το γένος και τη συνείδηση αποδεικνύεται με άλλους τρόπους (ν.δ. 3832/1958), οι οποίοι ανήκουν σε τουλάχιστον μία από τις παρακάτω κατηγορίες:
 Η επιλογή και η κατάταξη των ωφελουμένων γίνεται με τα κάτωθι κριτήρια:
 Διαδικασία υποβολής αιτήσεων,επιλογή υποψηφίων και διευκρινήσεις
 Με την Δημόσια Πρόσκληση του ΟΑΕΔ Νο 8/2018 , οι δυνητικοί ωφελούμενοι, καλούνται να υποβάλουν αποκλειστικά με ηλεκτρονικό τρόπο μία αίτηση συμμετοχής για τις προκηρυσσόμενες θέσεις, για μία ειδικότητα, επιλέγοντας από μία (1) μέχρι τρεις (3) υπηρεσίες τοποθέτησης ή/και επιβλέποντες φορείς, όπως προβλέπει η πρόσκληση.
 Η αίτηση αναρτάται στην ιστοσελίδα του ΟΑΕΔ (oaed.gr) και μετά τη συμπλήρωσή της οι δυνητικοί ωφελούμενοι την αποστέλλουν μέσω του συστήματος ηλεκτρονικών αιτήσεων.
 Η αίτηση υποβάλλεται απο 01/08/2018 και ώρα 14:00 έως και 20/08/2018 και ώρα 12η μεσημβρινή.Μετά τη λήξη της προθεσμίας δεν είναι δυνατή η υποβολή αιτήσεων.
 Η αίτηση του δυνητικού ωφελούμενου επέχει θέση υπεύθυνης δήλωσης, σύμφωνα με το άρθρο 8 του ν. 1599/1986, ως προς τα στοιχεία που αναφέρονται σε αυτήν. Η ανακρίβεια των στοιχείων που δηλώνονται από το δυνητικό ωφελούμενο επισύρει τον αποκλεισμό του από τη διαδικασία και τις προβλεπόμενες ποινικές και διοικητικές κυρώσεις.
 Διόρθωση ή τροποποίηση ή συμπλήρωση των αιτήσεων για ελλιπή στοιχεία -δικαιολογητικά, έστω και συμπληρωματικά ή διευκρινιστικά, επιτρέπεται με νέες αιτήσεις μέχρι τη λήξη της προθεσμίας υποβολής των ηλεκτρονικών αιτήσεων. Οι νέες αιτήσεις αντικαθιστούν τις προηγούμενες οι οποίες ακυρώνονται.
 Ο ΟΑΕΔ επεξεργάζεται τις αιτήσεις των δυνητικών ωφελουμένων για την απασχόλησή τους ανά ειδικότητα και τους κατατάσσει με μηχανογραφικό τρόπο σε προσωρινό πίνακα κατάταξης ανέργων Στον πίνακα αυτόν αναγράφονται υποχρεωτικά ο κωδικός αριθμός, η συνολική βαθμολογία των δυνητικών ωφελουμένων, οι μονάδες που αντιστοιχούν σε καθένα από τα κριτήρια κατάταξης της παρ. 5 του άρθρου 4, η σειρά κατάταξης με βάση τη συνολική βαθμολόγηση των κριτηρίων, η ειδικότητα των υποψηφίων, οι δηλωθείσες προτιμήσεις και η υπηρεσία τοποθέτησης ή/και ο επιβλέπων φορέας.
 Ο προσωρινός πίνακας κατάταξης ανέργων καταρτίζεται από τον . Ο προσωρινός πίνακας κατάταξης ανέργων περιλαμβάνει προσωρινό πίνακα επιτυχόντων, προσωρινό πίνακα επιλαχόντων και προσωρινό πίνακα αποκλειομένων στον οποίο αναφέρεται συγκεκριμένος λόγος αποκλεισμού. Ο προσωρινός πίνακας αναρτάται στο διαδικτυακό τόπο του ΟΑΕΔ και ανακοινώνεται η έκδοσή του στον πίνακα ανακοινώσεων του αρμόδιου Κέντρου Προώθησης Απασχόλησης (ΚΠΑ)2.
 Κατόπιν εξέτασης των ενστάσεων από το ΔΣ του ΟΑΕΔ εντός δέκα (10) εργάσιμων ημερών, ο οριστικός πίνακας κατάταξης ανέργων, ο οποίος περιλαμβάνει τον οριστικό πίνακα επιτυχόντων, τον οριστικό πίνακα επιλαχόντων και τον οριστικό πίνακα αποκλειομένων, εγκρίνεται από το Διοικητή ή από άλλο όργανο που ορίζεται με απόφασή του. Ο οριστικός πίνακας κατάταξης ανέργων αναρτάται στο διαδικτυακό τόπο του ΟΑΕΔ και η έκδοση του ανακοινώνεται στον πίνακα ανακοινώσεων του αρμόδιου ΚΠΑ2 και στον πίνακα ανακοινώσεων εκάστου επιβλέποντος φορέα.
 Οι άνεργοι που περιλαμβάνονται στον οριστικό πίνακα κατάταξης ανέργων θα πρέπει να είναι εγγεγραμμένοι στα μητρώα ανέργων του ΟΑΕΔ κατά την ημερομηνία υπόδειξής τους στους επιβλέποντες φορείς.
 Όσοι από την επόμενη ημέρα της προθεσμίας λήξης υποβολής των αιτήσεών τους απώλεσαν προσωρινά την ιδιότητα του ανέργου λόγω απασχόλησης ή ασθένειας και την επανακτούν μέχρι την ημερομηνία υπόδειξής τους στους επιβλέποντες φορείς παραμένουν στον οριστικό πίνακα κατάταξης ανέργων με τα ίδια αρχικά κριτήρια κατάταξης.
 Τα ανωτέρω δεν ισχύουν για όσους απώλεσαν προσωρινά την ιδιότητα του ανέργου λόγω μη ανανέωσης του δελτίου ανεργίας τους.
 Αμοιβή και απουσίες ωφελουμένων
 1.Ο ΟΑΕΔ καλύπτει το μισθολογικό κόστος των ωφελουμένων που θα απασχολήσει ο επιβλέπων φορέας και τις ασφαλιστικές εισφορές (φορέα – ωφελουμένου).Για κάθε ωφελούμενο που θα τοποθετηθεί από τον επιβλέποντα φορέα το μισθολογικό κόστος αντιστοιχεί:
 2.Ο ΟΑΕΔ και ο Επιβλέπων Φορέας, εκτός από τα οριζόμενα ποσά στην παρούσα, δεν καταβάλλει οποιαδήποτε άλλη παροχή, ενίσχυση ή αμοιβή στους ωφελούμενους (ενδεικτικά: επίδομα αδείας).
 3.Οι ωφελούμενοι απολαμβάνουν πλήρους ιατροφαρμακευτικής κάλυψης, υπαγόμενοι στην ασφάλιση του Ενιαίου Φορέα Κοινωνικής Ασφάλισης (ΕΦΚΑ).
 4.Για τους ωφελούμενους που θα απασχοληθούν σε βαριές και ανθυγιεινές εργασίες, όπως αυτές περιγράφονται στην αριθμ. Φ10221/οικ.26816/929/30.11.2011 απόφαση του Υπουργού Εργασίας και Κοινωνικής Ασφάλισης (Β” 2778), η καταβολή στο ΕΦΚΑ της αντίστοιχης εισφοράς του κλάδου βαρέων αποτελεί επίσης επιλέξιμη δαπάνη.
 5.Οι ωφελούμενοι διατηρούν την ασφάλιση για παροχές ασθένειας, ή αλλιώς την ασφαλιστική κάλυψη για ιατροφαρμακευτική περίθαλψη που απολάμβαναν ως μακροχρόνια άνεργοι, μέχρι τη λήξη διάρκειας των προγραμμάτων.
 6.Σε περιπτώσεις επιτρεπόμενης απουσίας ωφελουμένων από το πρόγραμμα, άνευ περικοπής αποδοχών τους, προηγείται έγγραφη αίτηση προς έγκρισή της από τον επιβλέποντα φορέα, με επισυναπτόμενα όλα τα απαραίτητα δικαιολογητικά, ανάλογα με καθεμία από τις ακόλουθες περιπτώσεις:
 α) δύο (2) ημέρες απασχόλησης μηνιαίως. Το δικαίωμα δύναται να ασκείται κατά τη διάρκεια και πριν την ολοκλήρωση του κάθε μήνα (δηλαδή και του πρώτου μήνα απασχόλησης). Επίσης, σε περίπτωση μη άσκησης του δικαιώματος διήμερης ανά μήνα απουσίας, ο ωφελούμενος δικαιούται να μεταφέρει το δικαίωμά του αυτό στον επόμενο ή τους επόμενους μήνες απασχόλησής του.
 β) Οι ωφελούμενοι δικαιούνται κατά τη διάρκεια του προγράμματος να κάνουν χρήση αναρρωτικής άδειας έως δεκατρείς (13) ημέρες. Οι αναρρωτικές άδειες βεβαιώνονται με τα απαραίτητα δικαιολογητικά. Η καταβολή των αποδοχών στους ωφελούμενους και των ασφαλιστικών εισφορών στους επιβλέποντες φορείς αποτελούν επιλέξιμες δαπάνες του προγράμματος.
 γ) Στις περιπτώσεις απουσίας λόγω επαπειλούμενης κύησης, κύησης και λοχείας, οι οποίες βεβαιώνονται με τα απαραίτητα δικαιολογητικά, η απασχόληση αναστέλλεται κατά τη διάρκεια απουσίας και παρατείνεται η δυνατότητα απασχόλησής τους όπως ορίζεται στην παρ. 8 του άρθρου 2. Οι ωφελούμενες σε κατάσταση κυοφορίας δύναται να απουσιάζουν για να υποβληθούν σε εξετάσεις προγεννητικού ελέγχου, εφόσον οι εξετάσεις αυτές πρέπει να γίνουν σε ώρες απασχόλησης.
 δ) Οι ωφελούμενοι ΑμεΑ ή ωφελούμενοι που έχουν παιδιά με πνευματική, ψυχική ή σωματική αναπηρία σε ποσοστό 67% και άνω ή παιδιά έως 15 ετών που πάσχουν από σακχαρώδη διαβήτη ινσουλινοεξαρτώμενο ή τύπου 1 με ποσοστό αναπηρίας 50% και άνω ή έχουν σύζυγο με αναπηρία 80% και άνω, τον/την οποίο/ο συντηρούν, έχουν δικαίωμα στο μειωμένο ωράριο κατά μία (1) ώρα την ημέρα.
 ε) Οι γονείς ωφελούμενοι δικαιούνται είτε να προσέρχονται αργότερα είτε να αποχωρούν νωρίτερα από την εργασία τους κατά μία (1) ώρα την ημέρα και μέχρι το τέκνο να φτάσει στην ηλικία των τριάντα (30) μηνών. (Στην περίπτωση των θετών γονέων, το δικαίωμα ασκείται με χρονική αφετηρία την υιοθεσία του παιδιού και έως την συμπλήρωση της ηλικίας των έξι (6) ετών αυτού).
 η) Κάθε γονέας παιδιού ηλικίας 4 έως 16 ετών δικαιούται να απουσιάζει δύο (2) ημέρες, σε ώρες ή ολόκληρη ημέρα κάθε φορά, προκειμένου να διευκολυνθεί για την παρακολούθηση της σχολικής επίδοσης.
 ι) Δύο (2) ημέρες λόγω θανάτου συζύγου, τέκνων, γονέων και αδελφών, αλλά και εξ αγχιστείας συγγενών στην ίδια γραμμή και στον ίδιο βαθμό.
 Όλη η Δημόσια Πρόσκληση του ΟΑΕΔ
 Επικοινωνήστε μαζί μας για οποιαδήποτε διευκρίνηση στο 2410 555 590 και με e-mail: info@kainotomia.com.gr.


text:
 3.9.2015
 HU
 Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja
 L 230/43
 AZ EGT VEGYES BIZOTTSÁG 236/2014 HATÁROZATA
 (2014. október 24.)
 az Európai Gazdasági Térségről szóló megállapodás XIII. mellékletének (Közlekedés) módosításáról [2015/1460]
 AZ EGT VEGYES BIZOTTSÁG,
 tekintettel az Európai Gazdasági Térségről szóló megállapodásra (a továbbiakban: az EGT-megállapodás) és különösen annak 98. cikkére,
 mivel:
 (1)
 A légiforgalmi szolgáltatási hálózat uniós szintű teljesítménycéljainak és riasztási küszöbértékeinek a 2015–2019. évi második referencia-időszakra vonatkozó meghatározásáról szóló, 2014. március 11-i 2014/132/EU bizottsági végrehajtási határozatot (1) bele kell foglalni az EGT-megállapodásba.
 (2)
 Az EGT-megállapodás XIII. mellékletét ezért ennek megfelelően módosítani kell,
 ELFOGADTA EZT A HATÁROZATOT:
 1. cikk
 Az EGT-megállapodás XIII. melléklete a 66xd. pont (2011/121/EU bizottsági határozat) után a következő ponttal egészül ki:
 „66xe.
 32014 D 0132: a Bizottság 2014. március 11-i 2014/132/EU végrehajtási határozata a légiforgalmi szolgáltatási hálózat uniós szintű teljesítménycéljainak és riasztási küszöbértékeinek a 2015–2019. évi második referencia-időszakra vonatkozó meghatározásáról (HL L 71., 2014.3.12., 20. o.).”
 2. cikk
 A 2014/132/EU végrehajtási határozatnak az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja EGT-kiegészítésében közzéteendő izlandi és norvég nyelvű szövege hiteles.
 3. cikk
 Ez a határozat 2014. november 1-jén lép hatályba, feltéve, hogy az EGT-megállapodás 103. cikkének (1) bekezdésében előírt összes bejelentést megtették (2), vagy a 390/2013/EU bizottsági végrehajtási rendeletet (3) az EGT-megállapodásba foglaló EGT vegyes bizottsági határozat hatálybalépésének napján, attól függően, hogy melyik a későbbi időpont.
 4. cikk
 Ezt a határozatot az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapjának EGT-re vonatkozó részében és EGT-kiegészítésében ki kell hirdetni.
 Kelt Brüsszelben, 2014. október 24-én.
 az EGT Vegyes Bizottság részéről
 az elnök
 Kurt JÄGER
 (1) HL L 71., 2014.3.12., 20. o.
 (2) Alkotmányos követelmények fennállását nem jelezték.
 (3) A Bizottság 2013. május 3-i 390/2013/EU végrehajtási rendelete a léginavigációs szolgálatok és a hálózati funkciók teljesítményrendszerének létrehozásáról (HL L 128., 2013.5.9., 1. o.).


text:
 Avis juridique important
 |
 11957E/PRO/PRI/03
 VERTRAG ZUR GRUENDUNG DER EUROPAEISCHEN WIRTSCHAFTSGEMEINSCHAFT, PROTOKOLL UEBER DIE VORRECHTE UND BEFREIUNGEN DER EUROPAEISCHEN WIRTSCHAFTSGEMEINSCHAFT, KAPITEL 1: VERMOEGENSGEGENSTAENDE, LIEGENSCHAFTEN, GUTHABEN UND GESCHAEFTE DER GEMEINSCHAFT, ARTIKEL 3
 ++++ ARTIKEL 3 DIE GEMEINSCHAFT, IHRE GUTHABEN, EINKÜNFTE UND SONSTIGEN VERMÖGENSGEGENSTÄNDE SIND VON JEDER DIREKTEN STEUER BEFREIT . DIE REGIERUNGEN DER MITGLIEDSTAATEN TREFFEN IN ALLEN FÄLLEN, IN DENEN ES IHNEN MÖGLICH IST, GEEIGNETE MASSNAHMEN FÜR DEN ERLASS ODER DIE ERSTATTUNG DES BETRAGS DER INDIREKTEN STEUERN UND VERKAUFSABGABEN, DIE IN DEN PREISEN FÜR BEWEGLICHE ODER UNBEWEGLICHE GÜTER INBEGRIFFEN SIND, WENN DIE GEMEINSCHAFT FÜR IHREN DIENSTBEDARF GRÖSSERE EINKÄUFE TÄTIGT, BEI DENEN DERARTIGE STEUERN UND ABGABEN IM PREIS ENTHALTEN SIND . DIE DURCHFÜHRUNG DIESER MASSNAHMEN DARF JEDOCH DEN WETTBEWERB INNERHALB DER GEMEINSCHAFT NICHT VERFÄLSCHEN . VON DEN ABGABEN, DIE LEDIGLICH DIE VERGÜTUNG FÜR LEISTUNGEN GEMEINNÜTZIGER VERSORGUNGSBETRIEBE DARSTELLEN, WIRD KEINE BEFREIUNG GEWÄHRT .


text:
 21.3.2009
 LT
 Europos Sąjungos oficialusis leidinys
 C 69/53
 2009 m. vasario 3 d. pareikštas ieškinys byloje Cachuera prieš VRDT — Gelkaps (Ayanda)
 (Byla T-43/09)
 (2009/C 69/115)
 Kalba, kuria surašytas ieškinys: ispanų
 Šalys
 Ieškovė: La Cachuera, SA (Misjonesas, Argentina), atstovaujama advokato E. Armijo Chávarri
 Atsakovė: Vidaus rinkos derinimo tarnyba (prekių ženklams ir pramoniniam dizainui)
 Kita procedūros Apeliacinėje taryboje šalis: Gelkaps GmbH (Pricvalkas, Vokietija)
 Ieškovės reikalavimai
 —
 Pripažinti, kad ieškinys dėl 2008 m. lapkričio 19 d. Vidaus rinkos derinimo tarnybos (VRDT) Antrosios apeliacinės tarybos sprendimo panaikinimo buvo pateiktas per nustatytą terminą bei reikiama forma ir pagal tinkamą procedūrą panaikinti minėtą sprendimą bei priteisti iš VRDT bylinėjimosi išlaidas.
 Ieškinio pagrindai ir pagrindiniai argumentai
 Bendrijos prekių ženklo paraišką pateikęs asmuo: Gelkaps GmbH
 Prašomas įregistruoti Bendrijos prekių ženklas: žodinis prekių ženklas AYANDA 3, 5, 28, 29, 30, 32 ir 44 klasių prekėms ir paslaugoms — paraiška Nr. 3.315.405
 Prekių ženklo ar žymens, kuriuo grindžiamas protestas, savininkas: ieškovė
 Prekių ženklas ar žymuo, kuriuo grindžiamas protestas: vaizdinis ir žodinis Ispanijos prekių ženklas AMANDA 30 klasės prekėms
 Protestų skyriaus sprendimas: iš dalies patenkinti protestą
 Apeliacinės tarybos sprendimas: atmesti apeliaciją
 Ieškinio pagrindai: Reglamento (EB) Nr. 40/94 8 straipsnio 1 dalies b punkto neteisingas taikymas


text:
 21.9.2015
 LT
 Europos Sąjungos oficialusis leidinys
 C 311/12
 2015 m. liepos 16 d. Teisingumo Teismo (šeštoji kolegija) sprendimas byloje Europos Komisija/Prancūzijos Respublika
 (Byla C-485/14) (1)
 ((Valstybės įsipareigojimų neįvykdymas - Laisvas kapitalo judėjimas - SESV 63 straipsnis ir EEE susitarimo 40 straipsnis - Turto perleidimo mokestis - Atleidimas nuo mokesčio - Palikimai ir dovanos - Skirtingas vertinimas - Kitoje valstybėje narėje esančios įstaigos - Dvišalės sutarties mokesčių srityje nebuvimas))
 (2015/C 311/14)
 Proceso kalba: prancūzų
 Šalys
 Ieškovė: Europos Komisija, atstovaujama J.-F. Brakeland ir W. Roels
 Atsakovė: Prancūzijos Respublika, atstovaujama D. Colas ir J.-S. Pilczer
 Rezoliucinė dalis
 1.
 Pripažinti, kad atleisdama nuo turto perleidimo mokesčių taikymo viešosioms ar visuomeninius poreikius tenkinančioms įstaigoms dovanojamoms dovanoms ir testamentu paliekamam turtui tik tuomet, kai minėtos įstaigos yra įsteigtos Prancūzijoje arba valstybėje narėje, arba valstybėje, kuri yra 1992 m. gegužės 2 d. Europos ekonominės erdvės susitarimo šalis, sudariusi su Prancūzija dvišalį susitarimą, Prancūzijos Respublika neįvykdė įsipareigojimų pagal Sutarties dėl Europos Sąjungos veikimo 63 straipsnį ir Europos ekonominės erdvės susitarimo 40 straipsnį.
 2.
 Priteisti š Prancūzijos Respublikos bylinėjimosi išlaidas.
 (1) OL C 7, 2015 1 12.