type: legislation

jurisdiction: EU

text:
 27.2.2016
 IT
 Gazzetta ufficiale dell'Unione europea
 L 52/19
 REGOLAMENTO DI ESECUZIONE (UE) 2016/276 DEL CONSIGLIO
 del 25 febbraio 2016
 che attua l'articolo 8 bis, paragrafo 1, del regolamento (CE) n. 765/2006, relativo a misure restrittive nei confronti della Bielorussia
 IL CONSIGLIO DELL'UNIONE EUROPEA,
 visto il trattato sul funzionamento dell'Unione europea,
 visto il regolamento (CE) n. 765/2006 del Consiglio, del 18 maggio 2006, relativo a misure restrittive nei confronti della Bielorussia (1), in particolare l'articolo 8 bis, paragrafo 1,
 vista la proposta dell'Alto rappresentante dell'Unione per gli affari esteri e la politica di sicurezza,
 considerando quanto segue:
 (1)
 Il 18 maggio 2006 il Consiglio ha adottato il regolamento (CE) n. 765/2006.
 (2)
 Il 25 febbraio 2016 il Consiglio ha adottato la decisione (PESC) 2016/280, con cui ha modificato la decisione 2012/642/PESC, relativa a misure restrittive nei confronti della Bielorussia (2), con la proroga dell'applicazione delle misure restrittive fino al 28 febbraio 2017, la modifica dell'allegato I e la soppressione dell'allegato II di tale decisione.
 (3)
 È opportuno pertanto modificare di conseguenza l'allegato I del regolamento (CE) n. 765/2006,
 HA ADOTTATO IL PRESENTE REGOLAMENTO:
 Articolo 1
 L'allegato I del regolamento (CE) n. 765/2006 è sostituito dal testo riportato nell'allegato del presente regolamento.
 Articolo 2
 Il presente regolamento entra in vigore il giorno successivo alla pubblicazione nella Gazzetta ufficiale dell'Unione europea.
 Il presente regolamento è obbligatorio in tutti i suoi elementi e direttamente applicabile in ciascuno degli Stati membri.
 Fatto a Bruxelles, il 25 febbraio 2016
 Per il Consiglio
 Il presidente
 K.H.D.M. DIJKHOFF
 (1) GU L 134 del 20.5.2006, pag. 1.
 (2) Decisione (PESC) 2016/280 del Consiglio, del 25 febbraio 2016, che modifica la decisione 2012/642/PESC, relativa a misure restrittive nei confronti della Bielorussia (cfr. la pagina 30 della presente Gazzetta ufficiale).
 ALLEGATO
 «ALLEGATO I
 Persone di cui all'articolo 2, paragrafo 1
 Nome
 Traslitterazione della grafia bielorussa
 Traslitterazione della grafia russa
 Nome
 (grafia bielorussa)
 Nome
 (grafia russa)
 Informazioni identificative
 Motivi dell'inserimento nell'elenco
 1.
 Navumau, Uladzimir Uladzimiravich
 Naumov, Vladimir Vladimirovich
 НАВУМАЎ, Уладзiмiр Уладзiмiравiч
 НАУМОВ, Владимир Владимирович
 Data di nascita: 7.2.1956
 Luogo di nascita: Smolensk (Russia)
 Non ha disposto l'avvio di indagini sulle sparizioni irrisolte di Yuri Zakharenko, Viktor Gonchar, Anatoly Krasovski e Dmitri Zavadski, avvenute in Bielorussia nel periodo 1999-2000. Ex ministro dell'interno e anche ex capo del servizio di sicurezza del presidente. Come ministro dell'interno è stato responsabile della repressione delle manifestazioni pacifiche fino al suo pensionamento per motivi di salute il 6 aprile 2009. Ha ottenuto dall'amministrazione presidenziale una residenza nel distretto di Drozdy riservato alla nomenclatura a Minsk. Nell'ottobre 2014 è stato insignito del III grado dell'ordine “per merito” dal presidente Lukashenko.
 2.
 Paulichenka, Dzmitry Valerievich
 Pavlichenko, Dmitri Valerievich (Pavlichenko, Dmitriy Valeriyevich)
 ПАЎЛIЧЭНКА, Дзмiтрый Валер'евiч
 ПАВЛИЧЕНКО, Дмитрий Валериевич
 Data di nascita: 1966
 Luogo di nascita: Vitebsk
 Indirizzo: Белорусская ассоциация ветеранов спецподразделений войск МВД “Честь”
 220028, Минск Маяковского, 111
 Persona chiave nelle sparizioni irrisolte di Yuri Zakharenko, Viktor Gonchar, Anatoly Krasovski e Dmitri Zavadski, avvenute in Bielorussia nel periodo 1999-2000. Ex capo del gruppo delle forze speciali del ministero dell'interno (SOBR).
 Uomo d'affari, capo di “Честь” (“Onore”), Associazione dei veterani delle forze speciali del ministero dell'interno.
 3.
 Sheiman, Viktar Uladzimiravich (Sheyman, Viktar Uladzimiravich)
 Sheiman, Viktor Vladimirovich (Sheyman, Viktor Vladimirovich)
 ШЭЙМАН, Biктap Уладзiмiравiч
 ШЕЙМАН, Виктор Владимирович
 Data di nascita: 26.5.1958
 Luogo di nascita: regione di Hrodna
 Indirizzo:
 Управлениe Делами Президента
 ул. К.Маркса, 38
 220016, г. Минск
 Capo del Servizio di gestione dell'amministrazione presidenziale. Responsabile delle sparizioni irrisolte di Yuri Zakharenko, Viktor Gonchar, Anatoly Krasovski e Dmitri Zavadski, avvenute in Bielorussia nel periodo 1999-2000. Ex segretario del Consiglio di sicurezza, è tuttora assistente speciale del presidente.
 4.
 Sivakau, Iury Leanidavich (Sivakau, Yury Leanidavich)
 Sivakov, Iury (Yurij, Yuri) Leonidovich
 СIВАКАЎ, Юрый Леанiдавiч
 СИВАКОВ, Юрий Леонидович
 Data di nascita: 5.8.1946
 Luogo di nascita: Onory, regione di Sakhalin
 Indirizzo:
 Белорусская ассоциация ветеранов спецподразделений войск МВД “Честь”
 220028, Минск Маяковского, 111
 Ha orchestrato le sparizioni irrisolte di Yuri Zakharenko, Viktor Gonchar, Anatoly Krasovski e Dmitri Zavadski, avvenute in Bielorussia nel periodo 1999-2000. Ex ministro del turismo e dello sport, ex ministro dell'interno ed ex vice capo dell'amministrazione presidenziale.»


type: contracts

text:
Nr. L 210 / 14 Amtsblatt der Europäischen Gemeinschaften 8 . 8 . 90
 BESGHLUSS Nr. 2 / 90 DES GEMISCHTEN AUSSCHUSSES EWG—NORWEGEN
 vom 2 . Mai 1990
 zur Ergänzung und Änderung von Anhang III des Protokolls Nr. 3 über die Bestimmung des
 Begriffs „Erzeugnisse mit Ursprung in" oder „Ursprungserzeugnisse" und über die Methoden
 der Zusammenarbeit der Verwaltungen betreffend die Änderungen der Ursprungsregeln
 infolge der Einführung des Harmonisierten Systems
 DER GEMISCHTE AUSSCHUSS — — Folien und Filme aus Ionomeren (Position 3920);
 gestützt auf das am 14. Mai 1973 in Brüssel unterzeichnete — Garne und Monofile (ex Kapitel 50 bis 55 );
 Abkommen zwischen der Europäischen Wirtschaftsgemein — Decken, andere Decken , Bettwäsche, Vorhänge und
 schaft und dem Königreich Norwegen, Gardinen und andere Waren zur Innenausstattung
 (Position 6301 bis 6304);
 gestützt auf das Protokoll Nr. 3 über die Bestimmung des
 Begriffs „Erzeugnisse mit Ursprung in" oder „Ursprungs — Waren aus Asbest ; Waren aus Gemischen auf der Grund
 erzeugnisse" und über die Methoden der Züsammenarbeit lage von Asbest oder auf der Grundlage von Asbest und
 der Verwaltungen, insbesondere auf Artikel 28 , Magnesiumkarbonat (Position ex 6812 );
 — Aluminium in Rohform (Position 7601 ) —
 in Erwägung nachstehender Gründe:
 In der Gemeinsamen Erklärung im Anhang zum Beschluß BESCHLIESST :
 Nr. 1 / 88 des Gemischten Ausschusses EWG—Norwegen ist
 vorgesehen, daß die Änderungen der Ursprungsregeln infol Artikel 1
 ge der Einführung des Harmonisierten Systems überprüft
 werden, wenn diese Änderungen eine Situation schaffen, die Die Positionen und die einschlägigen Regeln, die in der
 für die betreffenden Wirtschaftszweige von Nachteil ist. diesem Beschluß beigefügten Liste aufgeführt sind, vervoll
 Ferner ist vorgesehen, daß der Inhalt der betreffenden Regel ständigen oder ersetzen die entsprechenden Positionen und
 in der am 1 . Januar 1988 gültigen Form wiederherzustellen Regeln der Liste in Anhang III zu Protokoll Nr. 3 des
 ist.
 Abkommens EWG—Norwegen.
 Die mit Beschluß Nr . 1 / 88 des Gemischten Ausschusses
 EWG—Norwegen festgelegten Ursprungsregeln für die Artikel 2
 nachstehend aufgeführten Waren sind inhaltlich in der vor
 Einführung des Harmonisierten Systems gültigen Form Dieser Beschluß tritt am 1 . Januar 1988 in Kraft.
 wiederherzustellen :
 — Schleime und Verdickungsstoffe von Pflanzen, auch
 modifiziert (Position ex 1302); Geschehen zu Brüssel am 2 . Mai 1990 .
 — Copolymere aus Polycarbonaten und Acrylnitrilbuta
 dienstyrolcopolymeren (Position ex 3907); Für den Gemischten Ausschuß
 — Profile, Rohre und Schläuche (Positionen 3916 und Der Vorsitzende
 3917); R. COHEN
 ---pagebreak--- 8 . 8 . 90 Amtsblatt der Europäischen Gemeinschaften Nr. L 210 / 15
 ANHANG
 HS-Position Warenbezeichnung Be- oder Verarbeitungen von Vormaterialien
 ohne Ursprungseigenschaft, die Ursprung verleihen
 - (1 ) (2) (3)
 ex 1302 Schleime und Verdickungsstoffe von Pflanzen , auch Herstellen aus nichtmodifizierten Schleimen und Verdik
 modifiziert kungsstoffen
 ex 3901 bis 3915 Kunststoffe in Primärformen , Abfälle , Schnitzel und
 Bruch, aus Kunststoffen; ausgenommen die Waren für
 die unter der nachfolgenden Position 3907 eine beson
 dere Regel angeführt ist
 — Additionshomopolymerisationserzeugnisse Herstellen, bei dem
 — der Wert aller verwendeten Vormaterialien 50 v. H.
 des ab-Werk-Preises der hergestellten Ware nicht über
 schreitet
 und
 — der Wert der verwendeten Vormaterialien des Kapi
 tels 39 20 v. H. des ab-Werk-Preises der hergestellten
 Ware nicht überschreitet {')
 — andere Herstellen , bei dem der Wert der verwendeten Vormateri
 alien des Kapitels 39 20 v. H. des ab-Werk-Preises der
 hergestellten Ware nicht überschreitet (')
 ex 3907 Copolymere, aus Polycarbonaten und Acrylnitrilbuta Herstellen aus Vormaterialien , die in eine andere Position
 dienstyrolcopolymeren (ABS) als die hergestellte Ware einzureihen sind . Jedoch können
 Vormaterialien derselben Position verwendet werden ,
 wenn ihr Wert 50 v. H. des ab-Werk-Preises der herge
 stellten Ware nicht überschreitet (*)
 ex 3916 bis 3921 - Halb- und Fertigerzeugnisse aus Kunststoffen, ausge
 nommen für die Waren , für die unter den nachfolgen
 den Positionen ex 3916 , ex 3917 und ex 3920 beson
 dere Regeln angeführt sind
 — Flacherzeugnisse,, weiter bearbeitet als nur mit Herstellen, bei dem der Wert der verwendeten Vormateri
 Oberflächenbearbeitung oder anders als nur qua alien des Kapitels 39 50 v. H. des ab-Werk-Preises deir
 dratisch oder rechteckig zugeschnitten ; andere hergestellten Ware nicht überschreitet
 Erzeugnisse, weiter bearbeitet als nur mit Ober
 flächenbearbeitung
 — andere
 — aus Additionshomopolymerisationserzeugnis Herstellen , bei dem
 sen
 — der Wert aller verwendeten Vormaterialien 50 v. H.
 des ab-Werk-Preises der hergestellten Ware nicht über
 schreitet
 und
 — der Wert der verwendeten Vormaterialien des Kapi
 tels 39 20 v. H. des ab-Werk-Preises der hergestellten
 Ware nicht überschreitet ( l )
 — andere Herstellen , bei dem der Wert der verwendeten Vormateri
 alien des Kapitels 39 20 v. H. des ab-Werk-Preises der
 hergestellten Waren nicht überschreitet (*)
 (') Bei Erzeugnissen, die aus Vormaterialien der Positionen 3901 bis 3906 einerseits und aus Vormaterialien der Positionen 3907 bis 3911 andererseits
 zusammengesetzt sind, gilt diese Beschränkung nur für jene Gruppe von Vormaterialien, die in der hergestellten Ware gewichtsmäßig überwiegt.
 ---pagebreak--- Nr. L 210 / 16 Amtsblatt der Europäischen Gemeinschaften 8 . 8 . 90
 (1 ) (2) (3)
 ex 3916 und ex 3917 Profile, Rohre und Schläuche Herstellen, bei dem
 — der Wert aller verwendeten Vormaterialien 50 v. H.
 des ab-Werk-Preises der hergestellten Ware nicht über
 schreitet
 und
 — der Wert der Vormaterialien , die in dieselbe Position
 wie die hergestellte Ware einzureihen sind , 20 v. H. des
 ab-Werk-Preises der hergestellten Ware nicht über
 schreitet
 ex 3920 Folien und Filme aus Ionomeren Herstellen aus einem Salz eines thermoplastischen Kunst
 stoffs, der ein Mischpolymer aus Äthylen und Metacryl
 säure teilweise neutralisiert durch metallische Ionen ,
 hauptsächlich Zink und Natrium , ist
 ex Kapitel 50 bis 55 Garne, Monofile und Nähgarne Herstellen aus (')
 — Rohseide, Abfällen von Seide, gekrempelt oder
 gekämmt oder anders für die Spinnerei bearbeitet
 — andere natürliche Fasern, weder gekrempelt noch
 gekämmt oder anders für die Spinnerei bearbeitet
 — chemische Vormaterialien oder Spinnmasse
 oder
 — Vormaterialien für die Papierherstellung
 6301 bis 6304 Decken , Bettwäsche usw. ; Gardinen usw. ; andere
 Waren zur Innenausstattung
 — aus Filz oder Vliesstoffen Herstellen aus (')
 — natürlichen Fasern oder
 — chemischen Vormaterialien oder Spinnmasse
 — andere
 — bestickt Herstellen aus rohen , einfachen Garnen (*) (2 )
 oder
 Herstellen aus nicht bestickten Geweben (andere als
 gewirkte oder gestrickte), wenn der Wert der verwendeten
 nicht bestickten Gewebe 40 v. H. des ab-Werk-Preises der
 hergestellten Ware nicht überschreitet
 — andere Herstellen aus rohen , einfachen Garnen (>) ( 2 )
 ex 6812 Waren aus Asbest Herstellen , aus Vormaterialien jeder Position
 Waren aus Gemischen auf der Grundlage von Asbest
 oder auf der Grundlage von Asbest und Magnesium
 carbonat
 ex Kapitel 76 Aluminium und Waren daraus ; ausgenommen Waren Herstellen, bei dem
 der Positionen 7601 , 7602 und ex 7616 ; für Waren der — alle verwendeten Vormaterialien in eine andere Posi
 Positionen 7601 und ex 7616 sind nachfolgend beson tion als die hergestellte Ware einzureihen sind
 dere Regeln angeführt
 und
 — der Wert aller verwendeten Vormaterialien 50 v. H.
 des ab-Werk-Preises der hergestellten Ware nicht über
 schreitet
 7601 Aluminium in Rohförm Herstellen durch thermische oder elektrolytische Behand
 lung von nichtlegiertem Aluminium oder Abfällen und
 Schrott von Aluminium
 (?) Wegen der besonderen Vorschrift betreffend Waren, die aus verschiedenen textilen Vormaterialien bestehen, siehe Einleitende Bemerkung Nr. 6 .
 (2 ) Für Waren aus Gewirken und Gestricken, weder gummielastisch noch kautschukiert, durch Zusammennähen oder sonstiges Zusammenfügen der gewirkten
 (zugeschnittenen oder abgepaßten) Teile hergestellt, siehe Einleitende Bemerkung Nr. 7.


text:
 1.8.2015
 BG
 Официален вестник на Европейския съюз
 L 206/26
 РЕГЛАМЕНТ ЗА ИЗПЪЛНЕНИЕ (ЕС) 2015/1330 НА КОМИСИЯТА
 от 31 юли 2015 година
 за изменение за 234-ти път на Регламент (ЕО) No 881/2002 на Съвета за налагане на някои специфични ограничителни мерки, насочени срещу определени физически лица и образувания, свързани с мрежата на Ал Кайда
 ЕВРОПЕЙСКАТА КОМИСИЯ,
 като взе предвид Договора за функционирането на Европейския съюз,
 като взе предвид Регламент (ЕО) No 881/2002 на Съвета от 27 май 2002 г. за налагане на някои специфични ограничителни мерки, насочени срещу определени физически лица и образувания, свързани с мрежата на Ал Кайда (1), и по-специално член 7, параграф 1, буква а) и член 7а, параграф 5 от него,
 като има предвид, че:
 (1)
 В приложение I към Регламент (ЕО) No 881/2002 са изброени лицата, групите и образуванията, обхванати от мерките за замразяване на средства и икономически ресурси съгласно този регламент.
 (2)
 На 20 юли 2015 г. Комитетът по санкциите към Съвета за сигурност на Организацията на обединените нации (ООН) одобри заличаването на едно физическо лице в своя списък, свързан с Ал Кайда, на физическите лица, групите и образуванията, спрямо които следва да се прилага замразяването на средства и икономически ресурси. Освен това на 20 юли 2015 г. Комитетът по санкциите към Съвета за сигурност на ООН реши да измени едно вписване в списъка.
 (3)
 Приложение I към Регламент (ЕО) No 881/2002 следва да бъде съответно актуализирано,
 ПРИЕ НАСТОЯЩИЯ РЕГЛАМЕНТ:
 Член 1
 Приложение I към Регламент (ЕО) No 881/2002 се изменя в съответствие с приложението към настоящия регламент.
 Член 2
 Настоящият регламент влиза в сила в деня след публикуването му в Официален вестник на Европейския съюз.
 Настоящият регламент е задължителен в своята цялост и се прилага пряко във всички държави членки.
 Съставено в Брюксел на 31 юли 2015 година.
 За Комисията,
 от името на председателя,
 Началник на Службата за инструментите в областта на външната политика
 (1) ОВ L 139, 29.5.2002 г., стр. 9.
 ПРИЛОЖЕНИЕ
 Приложение I към Регламент (ЕО) No 881/2002 се изменя, както следва:
 1)
 В категорията „Физически лица“ се заличава следното вписване:
 „Aliaskhab Alibulatovich Kebekov (Алиaсхаб Алибулатович Кебеков) (известен още като: Sheikh Abu Muhammad, б) Ali Abu Muhammad, в) Abu Muhammad Ali Al-Dagestani). Дата на раждане: 1.1.1972 г. Място на раждане: село Teletl, район Shamilskiy, Република Дагестан, Руска федерация. Гражданство: руско. Паспорт No: 628605523 (руски паспорт за задгранично пътуване, издаден на 4.7.2006 г. от Федералната служба по въпросите на миграцията на Руската федерация и изтичащ на 16.7.2016 г.). Национален идентификационен номер: 8203883123 (номер на руски национален паспорт, издаден на 16.7.2005 г. от отдел „Вътрешни работи“ (OVD), район Kirovskiy, Република Дагестан, Руска федерация, изтича на 1.1.2017 г.). Адрес: Shosse Aeroporta, 5 Ap. 7 Makhachkala, Република Дагестан, Руска федерация. Други сведения: а) Физическо описание: цвят на очите: кафяв; цвят на косата: сив; височина: 170—175 см; телосложение: едър, овално лице, брада. б) Име на бащата: Alibulat Kebekovich Kebekov, роден през 1927 г. в) Налична е снимка за включване в специалното известие на Интерпол и Съвета за сигурност на ООН. Дата на определянето, посочено в член 2a, параграф 4, буква б): 23.3.2015 г.“
 2)
 Вписването „Mohammed Al Ghabra. Адрес: Източен Лондон, Обединено кралство. Дата на раждане: 1.6.1980 г. Място на раждане: Дамаск, Сирия. Гражданство: британско. Паспорт No: 094629366 (Обединено кралство). Други сведения: а) Име на бащата: Mohamed Ayman Ghabra; б) Име на майката: Dalal. Дата на определянето, посочена в член 2a, параграф 4, буква б): 12.12.2006 г.“ в категорията „Физически лица“ се заменя със следното:
 „Mohammed Al Ghabra (известен още като: a) Mohammed El' Ghabra б) Danial Adam) Адрес: Източен Лондон, Обединено кралство. Дата на раждане: 1.6.1980 г. Място на раждане: Дамаск, Сирия. Гражданство: британско. Паспорт No: 094629366 (Обединено кралство). Други сведения: а) Име на бащата: Mohamed Ayman Ghabra; б) Име на майката: Dalal. Дата на определянето, посочена в член 2a, параграф 4, буква б): 12.12.2006 г.“


text:
 21.2.2018
 EN
 Official Journal of the European Union
 L 48/3
 MARRAKESH TREATY
 to Facilitate Access to Published Works for Persons who are Blind, Visually Impaired, or otherwise Print Disabled
 THE CONTRACTING PARTIES,
 RECALLING the principles of non-discrimination, equal opportunity, accessibility and full and effective participation and inclusion in society, proclaimed in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities,
 MINDFUL of the challenges that are prejudicial to the complete development of persons with visual impairments or with other print disabilities, which limit their freedom of expression, including the freedom to seek, receive and impart information and ideas of all kinds on an equal basis with others, including through all forms of communication of their choice, their enjoyment of the right to education, and the opportunity to conduct research,
 EMPHASIZING the importance of copyright protection as an incentive and reward for literary and artistic creations and of enhancing opportunities for everyone, including persons with visual impairments or with other print disabilities, to participate in the cultural life of the community, to enjoy the arts and to share scientific progress and its benefits,
 AWARE of the barriers of persons with visual impairments or with other print disabilities to access published works in achieving equal opportunities in society, and the need to both expand the number of works in accessible formats and to improve the circulation of such works,
 TAKING INTO ACCOUNT that the majority of persons with visual impairments or with other print disabilities live in developing and least-developed countries,
 RECOGNIZING that, despite the differences in national copyright laws, the positive impact of new information and communication technologies on the lives of persons with visual impairments or with other print disabilities may be reinforced by an enhanced legal framework at the international level,
 RECOGNIZING that many Member States have established limitations and exceptions in their national copyright laws for persons with visual impairments or with other print disabilities, yet there is a continuing shortage of available works in accessible format copies for such persons, and that considerable resources are required for their effort of making works accessible to these persons, and that the lack of possibilities of cross-border exchange of accessible format copies has necessitated duplication of these efforts,
 RECOGNIZING both the importance of rightholders' role in making their works accessible to persons with visual impairments or with other print disabilities and the importance of appropriate limitations and exceptions to make works accessible to these persons, particularly when the market is unable to provide such access,
 RECOGNIZING the need to maintain a balance between the effective protection of the rights of authors and the larger public interest, particularly education, research and access to information, and that such a balance must facilitate effective and timely access to works for the benefit of persons with visual impairments or with other print disabilities,
 REAFFIRMING the obligations of Contracting Parties under the existing international treaties on the protection of copyright and the importance and flexibility of the three-step test for limitations and exceptions established in Article 9(2) of the Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works and other international instruments,
 RECALLING the importance of the Development Agenda recommendations, adopted in 2007 by the General Assembly of the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), which aim to ensure that development considerations form an integral part of the Organization's work,
 RECOGNIZING the importance of the international copyright system and desiring to harmonize limitations and exceptions with a view to facilitating access to and use of works by persons with visual impairments or with other print disabilities,
 HAVE AGREED AS FOLLOWS:
 Article 1
 Relation to Other Conventions and Treaties
 Nothing in this Treaty shall derogate from any obligations that Contracting Parties have to each other under any other treaties, nor shall it prejudice any rights that a Contracting Party has under any other treaties.
 Article 2
 Definitions
 For the purposes of this Treaty:
 (a)
 ‘works’ means literary and artistic works within the meaning of Article 2(1) of the Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works, in the form of text, notation and/or related illustrations, whether published or otherwise made publicly available in any media (1);
 (b)
 ‘accessible format copy’ means a copy of a work in an alternative manner or form which gives a beneficiary person access to the work, including to permit the person to have access as feasibly and comfortably as a person without visual impairment or other print disability. The accessible format copy is used exclusively by beneficiary persons and it must respect the integrity of the original work, taking due consideration of the changes needed to make the work accessible in the alternative format and of the accessibility needs of the beneficiary persons;
 (c)
 ‘authorized entity’ means an entity that is authorized or recognized by the government to provide education, instructional training, adaptive reading or information access to beneficiary persons on a non-profit basis. It also includes a government institution or non-profit organization that provides the same services to beneficiary persons as one of its primary activities or institutional obligations (2).
 An authorized entity establishes and follows its own practices:
 (i)
 to establish that the persons it serves are beneficiary persons;
 (ii)
 to limit to beneficiary persons and/or authorized entities its distribution and making available of accessible format copies;
 (iii)
 to discourage the reproduction, distribution and making available of unauthorized copies; and
 (iv)
 to maintain due care in, and records of, its handling of copies of works, while respecting the privacy of beneficiary persons in accordance with Article 8.
 Article 3
 Beneficiary Persons
 A beneficiary person is a person who:
 (a)
 is blind;
 (b)
 has a visual impairment or a perceptual or reading disability which cannot be improved to give visual function substantially equivalent to that of a person who has no such impairment or disability and so is unable to read printed works to substantially the same degree as a person without an impairment or disability; or (3)
 (c)
 is otherwise unable, through physical disability, to hold or manipulate a book or to focus or move the eyes to the extent that would be normally acceptable for reading;
 regardless of any other disabilities.
 Article 4
 National Law Limitations and Exceptions Regarding Accessible Format Copies
 1.
 (a)
 Contracting Parties shall provide in their national copyright laws for a limitation or exception to the right of reproduction, the right of distribution, and the right of making available to the public as provided by the WIPO Copyright Treaty (WCT), to facilitate the availability of works in accessible format copies for beneficiary persons. The limitation or exception provided in national law should permit changes needed to make the work accessible in the alternative format.
 (b)
 Contracting Parties may also provide a limitation or exception to the right of public performance to facilitate access to works for beneficiary persons.
 2. A Contracting Party may fulfill Article 4(1) for all rights identified therein by providing a limitation or exception in its national copyright law such that:
 (a)
 authorized entities shall be permitted, without the authorization of the copyright rightholder, to make an accessible format copy of a work, obtain from another authorized entity an accessible format copy, and supply those copies to beneficiary persons by any means, including by non-commercial lending or by electronic communication by wire or wireless means, and undertake any intermediate steps to achieve those objectives, when all of the following conditions are met:
 (i)
 the authorized entity wishing to undertake said activity has lawful access to that work or a copy of that work;
 (ii)
 the work is converted to an accessible format copy, which may include any means needed to navigate information in the accessible format, but does not introduce changes other than those needed to make the work accessible to the beneficiary person;
 (iii)
 such accessible format copies are supplied exclusively to be used by beneficiary persons; and
 (iv)
 the activity is undertaken on a non-profit basis;
 and
 (b)
 a beneficiary person, or someone acting on his or her behalf including a primary caretaker or caregiver, may make an accessible format copy of a work for the personal use of the beneficiary person or otherwise may assist the beneficiary person to make and use accessible format copies where the beneficiary person has lawful access to that work or a copy of that work.
 3. A Contracting Party may fulfill Article 4(1) by providing other limitations or exceptions in its national copyright law pursuant to Articles 10 and 11 (4).
 4. A Contracting Party may confine limitations or exceptions under this Article to works which, in the particular accessible format, cannot be obtained commercially under reasonable terms for beneficiary persons in that market. Any Contracting Party availing itself of this possibility shall so declare in a notification deposited with the Director-General of WIPO at the time of ratification of, acceptance of or accession to this Treaty or at any time thereafter (5).
 5. It shall be a matter for national law to determine whether limitations or exceptions under this Article are subject to remuneration.
 Article 5
 Cross-Border Exchange of Accessible Format Copies
 1. Contracting Parties shall provide that if an accessible format copy is made under a limitation or exception or pursuant to operation of law, that accessible format copy may be distributed or made available by an authorized entity to a beneficiary person or an authorized entity in another Contracting Party (6).
 2. A Contracting Party may fulfill Article 5(1) by providing a limitation or exception in its national copyright law such that:
 (a)
 authorized entities shall be permitted, without the authorization of the rightholder, to distribute or make available for the exclusive use of beneficiary persons accessible format copies to an authorized entity in another Contracting Party; and
 (b)
 authorized entities shall be permitted, without the authorization of the rightholder and pursuant to Article 2(c), to distribute or make available accessible format copies to a beneficiary person in another Contracting Party,
 provided that prior to the distribution or making available the originating authorized entity did not know or have reasonable grounds to know that the accessible format copy would be used for other than beneficiary persons (7).
 3. A Contracting Party may fulfill Article 5(1) by providing other limitations or exceptions in its national copyright law pursuant to Articles 5(4), 10 and 11.
 4.
 (a)
 When an authorized entity in a Contracting Party receives accessible format copies pursuant to Article 5(1) and that Contracting Party does not have obligations under Article 9 of the Berne Convention, it will ensure, consistent with its own legal system and practices, that the accessible format copies are only reproduced, distributed or made available for the benefit of beneficiary persons in that Contracting Party's jurisdiction.
 (b)
 The distribution and making available of accessible format copies by an authorized entity pursuant to Article 5(1) shall be limited to that jurisdiction unless the Contracting Party is a Party to the WIPO Copyright Treaty or otherwise limits limitations and exceptions implementing this Treaty to the right of distribution and the right of making available to the public to certain special cases which do not conflict with a normal exploitation of the work and do not unreasonably prejudice the legitimate interests of the rightholder (8)
 (9).
 (c)
 Nothing in this Article affects the determination of what constitutes an act of distribution or an act of making available to the public.
 5. Nothing in this Treaty shall be used to address the issue of exhaustion of rights.
 Article 6
 Importation of Accessible Format Copies
 To the extent that the national law of a Contracting Party would permit a beneficiary person, someone acting on his or her behalf, or an authorized entity, to make an accessible format copy of a work, the national law of that Contracting Party shall also permit them to import an accessible format copy for the benefit of beneficiary persons, without the authorization of the rightholder (10).
 Article 7
 Obligations Concerning Technological Measures
 Contracting Parties shall take appropriate measures, as necessary, to ensure that when they provide adequate legal protection and effective legal remedies against the circumvention of effective technological measures, this legal protection does not prevent beneficiary persons from enjoying the limitations and exceptions provided for in this Treaty (11).
 Article 8
 Respect for Privacy
 In the implementation of the limitations and exceptions provided for in this Treaty, Contracting Parties shall endeavor to protect the privacy of beneficiary persons on an equal basis with others.
 Article 9
 Cooperation to Facilitate Cross-Border Exchange
 1. Contracting Parties shall endeavor to foster the cross-border exchange of accessible format copies by encouraging the voluntary sharing of information to assist authorized entities in identifying one another. The International Bureau of WIPO shall establish an information access point for this purpose.
 2. Contracting Parties undertake to assist their authorized entities engaged in activities under Article 5 to make information available regarding their practices pursuant to Article 2(c), both through the sharing of information among authorized entities, and through making available information on their policies and practices, including related to cross-border exchange of accessible format copies, to interested parties and members of the public as appropriate.
 3. The International Bureau of WIPO is invited to share information, where available, about the functioning of this Treaty.
 4. Contracting Parties recognize the importance of international cooperation and its promotion, in support of national efforts for realization of the purpose and objectives of this Treaty (12).
 Article 10
 General Principles on Implementation
 1. Contracting Parties undertake to adopt the measures necessary to ensure the application of this Treaty.
 2. Nothing shall prevent Contracting Parties from determining the appropriate method of implementing the provisions of this Treaty within their own legal system and practice (13).
 3. Contracting Parties may fulfill their rights and obligations under this Treaty through limitations or exceptions specifically for the benefit of beneficiary persons, other limitations or exceptions, or a combination thereof, within their national legal system and practice. These may include judicial, administrative or regulatory determinations for the benefit of beneficiary persons as to fair practices, dealings or uses to meet their needs consistent with the Contracting Parties' rights and obligations under the Berne Convention, other international treaties, and Article 11.
 Article 11
 General Obligations on Limitations and Exceptions
 In adopting measures necessary to ensure the application of this Treaty, a Contracting Party may exercise the rights and shall comply with the obligations that that Contracting Party has under the Berne Convention, the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights and the WIPO Copyright Treaty, including their interpretative agreements so that:
 (a)
 in accordance with Article 9(2) of the Berne Convention, a Contracting Party may permit the reproduction of works in certain special cases provided that such reproduction does not conflict with a normal exploitation of the work and does not unreasonably prejudice the legitimate interests of the author;
 (b)
 in accordance with Article 13 of the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, a Contracting Party shall confine limitations or exceptions to exclusive rights to certain special cases which do not conflict with a normal exploitation of the work and do not unreasonably prejudice the legitimate interests of the rightholder;
 (c)
 in accordance with Article 10(1) of the WIPO Copyright Treaty, a Contracting Party may provide for limitations of or exceptions to the rights granted to authors under the WCT in certain special cases, that do not conflict with a normal exploitation of the work and do not unreasonably prejudice the legitimate interests of the author;
 (d)
 in accordance with Article 10(2) of the WIPO Copyright Treaty, a Contracting Party shall confine, when applying the Berne Convention, any limitations of or exceptions to rights to certain special cases that do not conflict with a normal exploitation of the work and do not unreasonably prejudice the legitimate interests of the author.
 Article 12
 Other Limitations and Exceptions
 1. Contracting Parties recognize that a Contracting Party may implement in its national law other copyright limitations and exceptions for the benefit of beneficiary persons than are provided by this Treaty having regard to that Contracting Party's economic situation, and its social and cultural needs, in conformity with that Contracting Party's international rights and obligations, and in the case of a least-developed country taking into account its special needs and its particular international rights and obligations and flexibilities thereof.
 2. This Treaty is without prejudice to other limitations and exceptions for persons with disabilities provided by national law.
 Article 13
 Assembly
 1.
 (a)
 The Contracting Parties shall have an Assembly.
 (b)
 Each Contracting Party shall be represented in the Assembly by one delegate who may be assisted by alternate delegates, advisors and experts.
 (c)
 The expenses of each delegation shall be borne by the Contracting Party that has appointed the delegation. The Assembly may ask WIPO to grant financial assistance to facilitate the participation of delegations of Contracting Parties that are regarded as developing countries in conformity with the established practice of the General Assembly of the United Nations or that are countries in transition to a market economy.
 2.
 (a)
 The Assembly shall deal with matters concerning the maintenance and development of this Treaty and the application and operation of this Treaty.
 (b)
 The Assembly shall perform the function allocated to it under Article 15 in respect of the admission of certain intergovernmental organizations to become party to this Treaty.
 (c)
 The Assembly shall decide the convocation of any diplomatic conference for the revision of this Treaty and give the necessary instructions to the Director-General of WIPO for the preparation of such diplomatic conference.
 3.
 (a)
 Each Contracting Party that is a State shall have one vote and shall vote only in its own name.
 (b)
 Any Contracting Party that is an intergovernmental organization may participate in the vote, in place of its Member States, with a number of votes equal to the number of its Member States which are party to this Treaty. No such intergovernmental organization shall participate in the vote if any one of its Member States exercises its right to vote and vice versa.
 4. The Assembly shall meet upon convocation by the Director-General and, in the absence of exceptional circumstances, during the same period and at the same place as the General Assembly of WIPO.
 5. The Assembly shall endeavor to take its decisions by consensus and shall establish its own rules of procedure, including the convocation of extraordinary sessions, the requirements of a quorum and, subject to the provisions of this Treaty, the required majority for various kinds of decisions.
 Article 14
 International Bureau
 The International Bureau of WIPO shall perform the administrative tasks concerning this Treaty.
 Article 15
 Eligibility for Becoming Party to the Treaty
 1. Any Member State of WIPO may become party to this Treaty.
 2. The Assembly may decide to admit any intergovernmental organization to become party to this Treaty which declares that it is competent in respect of, and has its own legislation binding on all its Member States on, matters covered by this Treaty and that it has been duly authorized, in accordance with its internal procedures, to become party to this Treaty.
 3. The European Union, having made the declaration referred to in the preceding paragraph at the Diplomatic Conference that has adopted this Treaty, may become party to this Treaty.
 Article 16
 Rights and Obligations Under the Treaty
 Subject to any specific provisions to the contrary in this Treaty, each Contracting Party shall enjoy all of the rights and assume all of the obligations under this Treaty.
 Article 17
 Signature of the Treaty
 This Treaty shall be open for signature at the Diplomatic Conference in Marrakesh, and thereafter at the headquarters of WIPO by any eligible party for one year after its adoption.
 Article 18
 Entry into Force of the Treaty
 This Treaty shall enter into force three months after 20 eligible parties referred to in Article 15 have deposited their instruments of ratification or accession.
 Article 19
 Effective Date of Becoming Party to the Treaty
 This Treaty shall bind:
 (a)
 the 20 eligible parties referred to in Article 18, from the date on which this Treaty has entered into force;
 (b)
 each other eligible party referred to in Article 15, from the expiration of three months from the date on which it has deposited its instrument of ratification or accession with the Director-General of WIPO.
 Article 20
 Denunciation of the Treaty
 This Treaty may be denounced by any Contracting Party by notification addressed to the Director-General of WIPO. Any denunciation shall take effect one year from the date on which the Director-General of WIPO received the notification.
 Article 21
 Languages of the Treaty
 1. This Treaty is signed in a single original in English, Arabic, Chinese, French, Russian and Spanish languages, the versions in all these languages being equally authentic.
 2. An official text in any language other than those referred to in Article 21(1) shall be established by the Director-General of WIPO on the request of an interested party, after consultation with all the interested parties. For the purposes of this paragraph, ‘interested party’ means any Member State of WIPO whose official language, or one of whose official languages, is involved and the European Union, and any other intergovernmental organization that may become party to this Treaty, if one of its official languages is involved.
 Article 22
 Depositary
 The Director-General of WIPO is the depositary of this Treaty.
 Done in Marrakesh on the 27th day of June, 2013.
 (1) Agreed statement concerning Article 2(a): For the purposes of this Treaty, it is understood that this definition includes such works in audio form, such as audiobooks.
 (2) Agreed statement concerning Article 2(c): For the purposes of this Treaty, it is understood that ‘entities recognized by the government’ may include entities receiving financial support from the government to provide education, instructional training, adaptive reading or information access to beneficiary persons on a non-profit basis.
 (3) Agreed statement concerning Article 3(b): Nothing in this language implies that ‘cannot be improved’ requires the use of all possible medical diagnostic procedures and treatments.
 (4) Agreed statement concerning Article 4(3): It is understood that this paragraph neither reduces nor extends the scope of applicability of limitations and exceptions permitted under the Berne Convention, as regards the right of translation, with respect to persons with visual impairments or with other print disabilities.
 (5) Agreed statement concerning Article 4(4): It is understood that a commercial availability requirement does not prejudge whether or not a limitation or exception under this Article is consistent with the three-step test.
 (6) Agreed statement concerning Article 5(1): It is further understood that nothing in this Treaty reduces or extends the scope of exclusive rights under any other treaty.
 (7) Agreed statement concerning Article 5(2): It is understood that, to distribute or make available accessible format copies directly to a beneficiary person in another Contracting Party, it may be appropriate for an authorized entity to apply further measures to confirm that the person it is serving is a beneficiary person and to follow its own practices as described in Article 2(c).
 (8) Agreed statement concerning Article 5(4)(b): It is understood that nothing in this Treaty requires or implies that a Contracting Party adopt or apply the three-step test beyond its obligations under this instrument or under other international treaties.
 (9) Agreed statement concerning Article 5(4)(b): It is understood that nothing in this Treaty creates any obligations for a Contracting Party to ratify or accede to the WCT or to comply with any of its provisions and nothing in this Treaty prejudices any rights, limitations and exceptions contained in the WCT.
 (10) Agreed statement concerning Article 6: It is understood that the Contracting Parties have the same flexibilities set out in Article 4 when implementing their obligations under Article 6.
 (11) Agreed statement concerning Article 7: It is understood that authorized entities, in various circumstances, choose to apply technological measures in the making, distribution and making available of accessible format copies and nothing herein disturbs such practices when in accordance with national law.
 (12) Agreed statement concerning Article 9: It is understood that Article 9 does not imply mandatory registration for authorized entities nor does it constitute a precondition for authorized entities to engage in activities recognized under this Treaty; but it provides for a possibility for sharing information to facilitate the cross-border exchange of accessible format copies.
 (13) Agreed statement concerning Article 10(2): It is understood that when a work qualifies as a work under Article 2(a), including such works in audio form, the limitations and exceptions provided for by this Treaty apply mutatis mutandis to related rights as necessary to make the accessible format copy, to distribute it and to make it available to beneficiary persons.


text:
 Avis juridique important
 |
 21984A0315(01)
 Diario Oficial n° L 072 de 15/03/1984 p. 0030
 ACUERDO en forma de canje de notas por el que se modifica el Acuerdo temporal de disciplina concertada entre la Comunidad Económica Europea y la República de Austria referente a los intercambios mutuos de quesos Nota n o 1 Señor Embajador , Tengo el honor de referirme al Acuerdo temporal de disciplina concertada entre la República de Austria y la Comunidad Económica Europea referente a los intercambios mutuos de quesos , firmado en Bruselas el 21 de octubre de 1981 y modificado en último lugar por el canje de notas del 23 de marzo de 1983 . I . Con ocasión de las últimas consultas habidas en virtud del artículo 6 de dicho Acuerdo , ha resultado oportuno la modificación de determinadas disposiciones del mismo , a fin de adaptarlo mejor a las necesidades reales del mercado . En dicho contexto , ha parecido necesario prorrogar el Acuerdo temporal un año más del período inicialmente previsto . No obstante , las dos partes expresan la esperanza de que esta modificación podrá crear las condiciones de una prórroga posterior del Acuerdo por una duración ilimitada . II . De común acuerdo , el Acuerdo temporal de disciplina concertada entre la República de Austria y la Comunidad Económica Europea referente a los intercambios mutuos de quesos quedará modificado de la siguiente manera : 1 . La fecha de « 31 de diciembre de 1984 » que figura en el apartado 1 del artículo II se sustituirá por la fecha de « 31 de diciembre de 1985 » . En el caso en que los intercambios de un lado o de otro no alcancen los niveles indicados en el Acuerdo , se entablarán consultas inmediatamente a instancia de una de las dos partes dirigidas a encontrar una solución mutuamente aceptable . Si en el transcurso de dichas consultas no pudière encontrarse una solución aceptable , cada parte tendrá el derecho de rescindir el presente Acuerdo con un preaviso de tres meses . 2 . El apartado 3 del artículo II se sustituirá por el texto siguiente : « 3 . Convienen , para el período que va del 1 de enero de 1984 al 31 de diciembre de 1985 , que , para los quesos mencionados en lo sucesivo , las cantidades intercambiadas anualmente así como los derechos de importación que deben percibirse en la importación no podrán sobrepasar los siguientes niveles : a ) En la importación en Austria i ) Quesos , fabricados a partir de leche de vaca , regulados por la subpartida 04.04 A del Arancel aduanero austriaco , de origen y procedencia de la Comunidad , acompañados de un certificado de calidad y de origen autorizado : * Cantidades * Derechos de importación * - Quesos fundidos * 2 000 toneladas * 760 S/100 kg * - Queso de pasta blanda azul * * 560 S/100 kg * - Danbo , Edam , Elbo , Fynbo , Fontal , Gouda , Havarti , Molbo , Maribo , Mimolette , Samsoe , Tybo * 3 000 toneladas * 560 S/100 kg * - Tilsit * 3 000 toneladas * 460 S/100 kg * - Emmenthal , Gruyere * 3 000 toneladas * 460 S/100 kg * - Butterkaese , Esrom , Italico , Kernheim , Saint-Nectaire , Saint-Paulin , Taleggio , Cheddar , así como los otros quesos no mencionados anteriormente , de un contenido en agua en la materia no grasa inferior o igual al 62 % , con excepción de los regulados por las subpartidas 04.04 A I a ) , b ) y c ) del Arancel aduanero austriaco * 3 000 toneladas * 560 S/100 kg * ii ) Los quesos mencionados en el inciso i ) , de origen comunitario , que no vayan acompañados del certificado contemplado en el inciso i ) , no podrán importarse en Austria . b ) En la importación de la Comunidad Quesos regulados por la partida n o 04.04 del arancel aduanero común , de origen y procedencia de Austria , acompañados de un certificado autorizado : * Cantidades * Derechos de importación * - Emmenthal , Gruyere , Sbrinz , Bergkaese , ni rallados ni en polvo , de un contenido mínimo en materia grasa del 45 % en peso de la materia seca , de una maduración de al menos tres meses , regulados por la subpartida 04.04 A del arancel aduanero común : * * * - en ruedas normalizadas * 5 000 toneladas (1) * 18,13 ECUS/100 kg * - en porciones , envasados al vacío o en gas inerte , con corteza en al menos un lado , de un peso neto igual o superior a 1 kg , e inferior a 5 kg * 3 000 toneladas (1) * 18,13 ECUS/100 kg * - Quesos fundidos , ni rallados ni en polvo , en cuya fabricación sólo hayan entrado a formar parte los quesos Emmenthal , Gruyere y Appenzell y , eventualmente , con carácter adicional , el Glaris a las hierbas ( llamado " Schabziger " ) , acondicionados para la venta al por menor y de un contenido en materia grasa en peso de la materia seca inferior o igual al 56 % , regulados por la subpartida 04.04 D del arancel aduanero común * 3 750 toneladas * 36,27 ECUS/100 kg * - Quesos fundidos , ahumados , de un contenido en materia grasa en peso de la materia seca igual o superior al 40 % e inferior o igual al 48 % , regulados por la subpartida 04.04 D I a ) del arancel aduanero común (2) * 350 toneladas * Exacción reguladora completa * - Tilsit , de pasta no prensada , de una maduración de al menos un mes , y Butterkaese , regulados por la subpartida 04.04 E I b ) 2 del arancel aduanero común * 2 400 toneladas * 55 ECUS/100 kg * - Quesos de pasta blanda azul regulados por la subpartida 04.04 C del arancel aduanero común * 2 400 toneladas * 55 ECUS/100 kg * - Edam , de un contenido en materia grasa en peso de la materia seca igual o superior al 40 % e inferior al 48 % , presentados en ruedas de un peso neto inferior o igual a 350 g , ( llamado " Geheimratskaese " , regulado por la subpartida 04.04 E I b ) 2 del arancel aduanero común * 2 400 toneladas * 55 ECUS/100 kg * - Quesos llamados " Feta " y " Kefalo-Tyri " , fabricados a partir de leche de vaca , de un contenido en materia grasa en peso de la materia seca inferior al 48 % , regulados por la subpartida 04.04 E I b ) 2 del arancel aduanero común * 2 400 toneladas * 55 ECUS/100 kg * - Otros quesos (2) * 200 toneladas * Exacción reguladora completa * 3 . El apartado 4 del artículo II se sustituirá por el texto siguiente : « 4 . Austria se compromete a adoptar las medidas necesarias a fin de garantizar que : - por una parte , las cantidades convenidas , bien en la importación en Austria procedente de la Comunidad contemplada en la letra a ) del apartado 3 , bien en la exportación de Austria a la Comunidad contemplada en la letra b ) del apartado 3 , no se sobrepasen , - por otra parte , las licencias de importación en Austria se concedan de forma regular y de manera tal que las cantidades convenidas en la importación en Austria procedentes de la Comunidad puedan realizarse . Las disposiciones referentes a dicha materia y , en particular , las modalidades de distribución de las licencias se pondrán en conocimiento de las autoridades competentes de la Comunidad así como de los exportadores y/o los importadores . La Comunidad y Austria procurarán que las ventajas mutuamente concedidas no se vean comprometidas por otras medidas en la importación . » 4 . El período del « primer semestre de 1984 » que figura en el apartado 9 del artículo II se sustituirá por el período del « segundo trimestre de 1985 » . III . Todas las restantes disposiciones del Acuerdo no cambiarán . Le agradeceré tenga la amabilidad de confirmarme su acuerdo sobre el contenido de esta nota . Le ruego acepte , señor Embajador , el testimonio de mi mayor consideración . En nombre del Consejo de las Comunidades Europeas (1) Las cantidades encuadradas en dichas categorías de quesos serán intercambiables hasta el límite del 25 % de las cantidades indicadas . (2) Dichos quesos no deberán ir acompañados de un certificado autorizado . » Nota n o 2 Señor Director General , Tengo el honor de acusar recibo de su nota de esta misma fecha relativa a la modificación del Acuerdo temporal de disciplina concertada entre la Comunidad Económica Europea y la República de Austria referente a los intercambios mútuos de quesos . Puedo confirmarle el acuerdo de mi Gobierno con el contenido de dicha nota . Le ruego acepte , señor Director General , el testimonio de mi mayor consideración . Por el Gobierno de la República de Austria


type: wikipedia

text:
Rigsdansk er den almindelige betegnelse for standarddansk. Tidligere var det den eneste variant af dansk der var tilladt i radio og tv. Siden 1970'erne er rigsdansk svækket, samtidig med at de danske dialekter i stigende grad har nærmet sig rigsdansk.
 Omkring 1500 udviklede der sig en fælles dansk skriftssprogsnorm i kancelliet og ved hoffet. Den tog udgangspunkt i de dialekter der taltes af borgerskabet i København og Malmø og blev derfor primært baseret på sjællandsk med en vis påvirkning fra skånsk. Det fik også betydning for udviklingen af et dansk standardsprog at den første danske bibeloversættelse blev udfærdiget af nordsjællænderen Christiern Pedersen, hvis skriftsprog var påvirket af Hillerød-dialekten..
 En udbredt definition på rigsdansk er et dansk der ikke røber hvorfra den talende kommer. Denne definition udelukker i praksis de højsprogs-varianter af dansk der tales i købstæderne såvel som nutidens københavnsk fra at være rigsdansk, selv om disse varianter stort set ikke adskiller sig fra det traditionelle rigsdansk i andet end sætningstonen og vokalernes åbningsgrader. Føres definitionen ud i sin yderste konsekvens, findes der kun meget få rigsdansktalende i Danmark. En mere frugtbar definition accepterer derfor en vis spændvidde i sproget.
 Rigsdansk er under alle omstændigheder ikke statisk, men et sprog i rivende udvikling, ikke mindst på det lydlige område:
 r er blevet vokaliseret efter vokaler.
 Vokalen a er blevet lukket ("fladt")
 Kort o er blevet åbnet (= å).
 De fleste vokaler er blevet åbnet betydeligt efter og foran r; modsætningen mellem e/æ og a er blevet ophævet i lukket stavelse foran dentaler og labialer, f.eks. ret = rat, kræft = kraft.
 Forskellen mellem korte og lange vokaler er blevet ophævet foran blødt d.
 Der er en voksende forskel på den danske retstavning og den aktuelle udtale af sproget, mere end på nabosprogene svensk og norsk. Retstavningen blev lagt fast i det 19. århundrede (med mindre revisioner i løbet af det 20.), men den grunder sig på en praksis der har været nogenlunde konstant siden det 16. århundrede.
 Referencer
 Eksterne henvisninger
 Det Danske Sprog- og Litteraturselskab
 http://videnskab.dk/sporg-videnskaben/hvorfor-blev-kobenhavnsk-den-rigsdanske-dialekt
 Dansk sprog
 Danske dialekter


type: other

text:
Leia a Matemática do Trânsito, por Rosildo Barcelos - Cassilândia News
 Últimas NotíciasÚltimas Notícias11/08/2006 08:05Leia a Matemática do Trânsito, por Rosildo BarcelosRosildo BarcelosImprimir
 A partir de hoje e semanalmente, Rosildo Barcelos passa a colaborar com o Cassilândianews. Ele mesmo se apresenta "sou instrutor do DPRF-Ministério da Justiça e procuro zelar pela informação aos usuários e viajo
 pelo Brasil realizando cursos e palestras sobre esse assunto; mas sou nascido em Campo Grande/MS, sou consultor de varios jornais, um deles pode ser acessado por www.jornaldedomingo.com.br."
 A primeira matéria enviada é interessantíssima. Leia:
 Matemática do Trânsito
 O Código de Trânsito Brasileiro  CTB  tem como sua principal marca o zelo pela segurança do trânsito, que se manifesta em vários pontos, como o nível de exigência na qualificação dos condutores e o rigor na punição das
 infrações. Esse direcionamento é absolutamente correto e tem por finalidade diminuir o número de acidentes de trânsito em nosso País, bem como a gravidade dos mesmos .
 Nesse momento citaremos alguns exemplos de números na fiscalização de trânsito, ou seja, as quantidades, medidas e prazos que devem ser avaliados para a configuração de determinadas infrações de trânsito que
 muito confundem e servem de ilustração para várias situações do cotidiano. (quando mencionado apenas o número do artigo, referimo-nos aos artigos do Código de Trânsito Brasileiro  Lei no 9.503/97).
 TRINTA DIAS é o período de tolerância, após o vencimento da Carteira Nacional de Habilitação, para que não se configure a infração de trânsito do artigo 162, V (embora o texto do CTB mencione apenas a CNH, omitindo-se
 quanto à Permissão para Dirigir, o CONTRAN determinou a mesma tolerância ao documento provisório, conforme artigo 34, § 5o, da Resolução no 168/04, com alteração da 169/04).
 DEZ ANOS é a idade mínima para o transporte de crianças nos bancos dianteiros dos automóveis, conforme o artigo 64, salvo as exceções previstas pelo CONTRAN na Resolução no 15/98, sob pena de cometimento da
 infração de trânsito do artigo 168.
 Já para o transporte de crianças em motocicletas, motonetas e ciclomotores, a idade mínima é de SETE ANOS, de acordo com o artigo 244, V. CINCO METROS é a distância mínima, a contar da esquina, para a parada e o
 estacionamento de veículos (artigos 182, I e 181, I). Por outro lado, a distância lateral da guia da calçada ao veículo é de no máximo CINQÛENTA CENTÍMETROS (artigos 182, II e 181, II).
 CENTO E QUATRO decibéis é o nível máximo permissível de pressão sonora emitida por buzina, de acordo com a Resolução do CONTRAN no 35/98;entretanto, se o veículo tiver sido produzido a partir de 2002, o limite é
 de NOVENTA E TRÊS decibéis, caso contrário terá ocorrido a infração doartigo 227, V. Para que não se configure infração de trânsito do artigo 231, IV, as dimensões máximas de um veículo são de: DOIS METROS E SESSENTA CENTÍMETROS para largura, QUATRO METROS E QUARENTA CENTÍMETROS para altura e CATORZE
 METROS para comprimento (para veículos simples), conforme Resolução do CONTRAN no 12/98.
 Não obstante, passados tantos anos da entrada em vigor do Código, pode-se verificar que alguns equívocos foram cometidos pelo legislador e necessitam de correção. Exemplificando que não existia uma real gradação
 das punições temos numa via coletora, onde a velocidade máxima permitida for 40 Km/h, o condutor que for flagrado a 45 Km/h pagará a mesma multa (bastante alta, por sinal) que outro condutor flagrado a 60 Km/h. Por
 outro lado, numa rodovia, onde a velocidade máxima permitida pode chegar a 110 Km/h, a penalidade vai ser a mesma, tanto se o condutor estiver a 112 km/h, como se estiver a 130 Km/h. Esse fato constitui uma injustiça para com os condutores que são obrigados a arcar com uma multa altíssima por um pequeno descuido, que não chega a representar grande ameaça para a segurança do trânsito.
 Esta situação foi corrigida pela gradação das penalidades nos casos de infração por excesso de velocidade e assim sendo desde 26 de julho de 2006;o art. 218 da Lei no 9.503, de 23 de setembro de 1997, passou a
 vigorar com a seguinte redação(lei 11334/06): Art. 218. Transitar em velocidade superior à máxima permitida para o local, medida por instrumento ou equipamento hábil, em rodovias, vias de trânsito rápido, vias arteriais e demais vias:
 II - quando a velocidade for superior à máxima em mais de 20% (vinte por
 cento) até 50% (cinqüenta por cento):
 III - quando a velocidade for superior à máxima em mais de 50% (cinqüenta
 por cento):
 Dessa forma, os condutores flagrados nesse tipo de infração não seriam punidos da mesma forma que aqueles que realmente representam um risco para a segurança do trânsito. Há que se considerar, a propósito, que, ao meu
 entender , uma penalidade mais leve surte um efeito educativo muito maior .
 * é articulista e consultor, especialista em Legislação de Trânsito Dúvidas e consultas: barcellos.articulista@estadao.com.brImprimir


text:
Uchwała nr XXX/255/13 Rady Miejskiej w Miasteczku Śląskim z dnia 24 maja 2013r. w sprawie szczegółowych warunków przyznawania
 i odpłatności za usługi opiekuńcze lub specjalistyczne usługi opiekuńcze
 zwolnienia z opłat, jak również trybu pobierania opłat
 PORTAL INFOR.PLKsiegowość firmSektor publicznyKsiegowość budżetowaBiznesKadryPrawoBiura rachunkoweSklep | IFK | IRB | INFORLEX | GAZETA PRAWNA | INFORORGANIZER | APLIKACJA MOBILNA | KARIERA | SKLEPSzukajSzukajKsięgowość firmKSIĘGOWOŚĆ FIRMPodatkiRachunkowośćObrót gospodarczyZUS i kadryVademecumPublikacjeAktualnościPoradnikiForumBiura rachunkoweBIURA RACHUNKOWEZakładam biuroProwadzę biuroKorzystam z biuraKsięgowość budżetowaKSIĘGOWOŚĆ BUDŻETOWARachunkowość budżetowaSprawozdawczośćPodatkiKadry i płaceZUSZamówienia publiczneForumSektor publicznySEKTOR PUBLICZNYOrganizacjaFinanseZadaniaRozwój i promocjaForumKadryKADRYKodeks pracyZatrudnienieUrlopyWynagrodzeniaWypowiedzenieUbezpieczenia społeczneZUSBHPNarzędziaForumBiznesBIZNESPrawo dla firmMoja firmaZarządzanieFinanseMotoNieruchomościForumPrawoPRAWONowościPracaSprawy rodzinneSprawy karneKonsument i umowySprawy urzędoweForum prawneVAT 2017Prenumerata 2017Aplikacja Akty prawneSklepNarzędzia:KalkulatoryWskaźniki i stawkiAkty prawne ujednoliconeFormularze PITDzienniki UstawTerminarzPKWIUNewsletterreklamaJesteś tutaj: STRONA GŁÓWNA > Akty prawneUchwała nr XXX/255/13 Rady Miejskiej w Miasteczku
 odpłatności za usługi opiekuńcze lub specjalistyczne usługi
 MetrykaTekst pierwotny Na podstawie art. 7 ust. 1 pkt. 6, art. 18 ust. 2 pkt. 15, art. 40 ust. 1, art. 41 ust. 1, art. 42 ustawy z dnia 8 marca 1991 r. o samorządzie gminnym (Tekst jednolity , Dz. U. z 2013 r., poz.594), w związku z art. 17 ust. 1 pkt. 11 i art. 50 ust.6 ustawy z dnia 12 marca 2004 r. o pomocy społecznej (tekst jednolity Dz. U. z 2013 r., poz. 182). Rozdział 1. Postanowienia ogólne § 1. Uchwała określa: 1) szczegółowe zasady przyznawania oraz odpłatności za usługi opiekuńcze i specjalistyczne usługi opiekuńcze, z wyłączeniem usług opiekuńczych dla osób z zaburzeniami psychicznymi, 2) szczegółowe zasady częściowego lub całkowitego zwalniania z opłat za usługi, o których mowa w punkcie 1, 3) tryb pobierania opłat za usługi, o których mowa w punkcie 1, § 2. Ilekroć w uchwale jest mowa o: 1) kierowniku – należy rozumieć przez to kierownika Miejskiego Ośrodka Pomocy Społecznej w Miasteczku Śląskim, 2) ośrodku – należy rozumieć przez to Miejski Ośrodek Pomocy Społecznej w Miasteczku Śląskim, Rozdział 2. Szczegółowe zasady przyznawania i odpłatności za usługi opiekuńcze i specjalistyczne usługi opiekuńcze. § 3. 1. Wymiar i zakres przyznawanych usług opiekuńczych i specjalistycznych usług opiekuńczych uzależniony jest od sytuacji rodzinnej i materialnej świadczeniobiorcy, ustalonej przez pracownika socjalnego w drodze wywiadu środowiskowego oraz dokumentacji uzasadniającej konieczność przyznania pomocy. 2. W decyzji przyznającej usługi ustala się ich rodzaj, zakres, okres na jaki przyznano świadczenie, miejsce świadczenia usług, liczbę godzin przyznanych usług dziennie, przy czym liczbę przyznanych godzin specjalistycznych usług opiekuńczych ustala się w stosunku miesięcznym. W decyzji rozstrzyga się także o sposobie rozliczania za wykonane usługi, wysokość odpłatności za jedną godzinę usług, tryb ustalania poboru opłaty. § 4. 1. Usługi przyznaje się na wniosek osoby zainteresowanej, jej przedstawiciela ustawowego, innej osoby, a także z urzędu, za zgodą osoby zainteresowanej lub jej przedstawiciela ustawowego. 2. Każdy komu jest znana sytuacja osobista i zdrowotna osoby wymagającej pomocy w formie usług może poinformować Ośrodek o potrzebie przyznania usług. 3. Szczegółowego rozpoznania potrzeb osób w zakresie pomocy w formie usług, dokonuje Ośrodek przez pracowników socjalnych, uwzględniając indywidualne potrzeby tych osób, schorzenia lub niepełnosprawność oraz zalecenia lekarza. § 5. 1. Odpłatność za usługi ustalana jest miesięcznie na podstawie obowiązującej ceny za jedną godzinę świadczenia usług (roboczogodzinę), według zasad określonych w § 6. 2. Kwotę miesięcznej odpłatności za wykonane usługi stanowi iloczyn ceny, o której mowa w ust. 1, wskaźnika odpłatności określonego w procentach, o którym mowa w tabeli nr 1 w § 6 oraz liczby godzin usług świadczonych w ciągu miesiąca. 3. Cena jednej godziny świadczenia usług, o której mowa w ust.1 ustalana jest na podstawie kalkulacji sporządzanej przez Ośrodek. 4. Kierownik sporządza jeden raz w roku kalkulację ceny za jedną godzinę świadczenia usług, a w przypadku jej wzrostu, przedstawia Radzie Miejskiej do zatwierdzenia. 5. Cena za jedną godzinę świadczenia usług podlega ogłoszeniu na tablicach ogłoszeń Ośrodka. 6. Osoby, którym przyznano pomoc społeczną w formie usług, nie ponoszą opłat za usługi, jeżeli dochód na osobę w rodzinie lub dochód osoby samotnie gospodarującej nie przekracza kryteriów dochodowych osoby samotnie gospodarującej określonych w ustawie o pomocy społecznej. § 6. Odpłatność za usługi opiekuńcze i specjalistyczne usługi opiekuńcze, z wyłączeniem specjalistycznych usług opiekuńczych dla osób z zaburzeniami psychicznymi, określa poniższa tabela: Dochód na osobę wg. kryterium dochodowego określonego w art. 8, ust. 1 ustawy o pomocy społecznej w %. Wskaźnik odpłatności w % ustalony od ceny usługi za jedną godzinę. Osoby samotne i osoby samotnie gospodarujące. Wskaźnik odpłatności w % ustalony od ceny usługi za jedną godzinę. Osoby pozostające w rodzinie. Do 100% Nieodpłatnie Nieodpłatnie 101% - 150% 10% 20% 151% - 200% 30% 40% 201% - 300% 40% 60% 301% - 400% 60% 80% Powyżej 401% 100% 100% Rozdział 3. Szczegółowe zasady częściowego lub całkowitego zwolnienia od opłat za usługi opiekuńcze i specjalistyczne usługi opiekuńcze. § 7. 1. W następujących przypadkach osoba zainteresowana może na wniosek lub z urzędu zostać częściowo lub całkowicie zwolniona z opłat za usługi, ze względu na : 1) korzystanie co najmniej dwóch rodzajów usług, 2) konieczności ponoszenia opłat za pobyt członka rodziny w domu pomocy społecznej lub w ośrodku wsparcia i wszelkiego typu placówkach opiekuńczo - wychowawczych i leczniczo-rehabilitacyjnych, 3) konieczności ponoszenia znacznych wydatków z powodu długotrwałej choroby wymagającej zakupu leków lub sprzętu rehabilitacyjnego, 4) co najmniej dwie osoby w rodzinie wymagające udzielenia pomocy w formie usług opiekuńczych lub specjalistycznych usług opiekuńczych, w tym jedną przewlekle chorą, 5) szczególne okoliczności wynikające z długotrwałej choroby, bezrobocia, niepełnosprawności, śmierci członka rodziny, strat materialnych powstałych w wyniku zdarzeń losowych lub klęski żywiołowej. 2. Decyzję o częściowym lub całkowitym zwolnieniu z odpłatności wydaje się na czas określony, jednorazowo nie dłuższy niż jeden rok. Rozdział 4. Tryb pobierania opłat § 8. Wykonawca usług opiekuńczych i specjalistycznych usług opiekuńczych pobiera odpłatność: a) bezpośrednio od podopiecznego w wymiarze wynikającym z decyzji administracyjnej, b) ze środków własnych Ośrodka, na podstawie wystawionego rachunku za świadczone usługi, w wymiarze wynikającym z decyzji administracyjnej, w rozliczeniu miesięcznym. Rozdział 5. Wysokość ceny jednej godziny usług § 9. Zatwierdza się cenę jednej godziny usług opiekuńczych i specjalistycznych usług opiekuńczych świadczonych przez gminę ramach zadań własnych w wysokości ........ złotych (słownie: .......). Rozdział 6. Postanowienia końcowe § 10. Kwota kryterium dochodowego dla osoby samotnie gospodarującej, o której mowa w § 6 uchwały, stanowiąca podstawę ustalenia odpłatności, ulega zmianie, w przypadku zmiany jej wysokości zgodnie z przepisami ustawy z dnia 12 marca 2004 r. o pomocy społecznej (tekst jednolity Dz. U. z 2013 r., poz. 182). § 11. Z dniem wejścia w życie niniejszej uchwały traci moc uchwała Nr XXIV/204/12 Rady Miejskiej w Miasteczku Śląskim z dnia 19 grudnia 2012 r. w sprawie szczegółowych zasad przyznawania i odpłatności za usługi opiekuńcze lub specjalistyczne usługi opiekuńcze z wyłączeniem specjalistycznych usług opiekuńczych oraz szczegółowych warunków częściowego lub całkowitego zwolnienia z opłat. § 12. Wykonanie uchwały powierza się Burmistrzowi Miasta Miasteczko Śląskie. § 13. Uchwała wchodzi w życie po upływie 14 dni od dnia ogłoszenia w Dzienniku Urzędowym Województwa Śląskiego. Przewodniczący Rady mgr inż. Józef Myśliwczyk Uzasadnienie W związku z faktem zgłaszania do tutejszego Ośrodka przypadków osób, które w przyszłości z powodu wieku, choroby lub innych przyczyn będą wymagały pomocy w formie usług opiekuńczych lub specjalistycznych usług opiekuńczych (zgodnie z art. 50 ustawy o pomocy społecznej), konieczne jest opracowanie szczegółowych zasad i warunków przyznawania w/wym. pomocy. Ponadto art. 50 ust. 6 powyższej ustawy mówi, że Rada Gminy określa w drodze uchwały, szczegółowe warunki przyznawania i odpłatności za usługi opiekuńcze i specjalistyczne usługi opiekuńcze, z wyłączeniem specjalistycznych usług opiekuńczych dla osób z zaburzeniami oraz szczegółowe warunki częściowego lub całkowitego zwolnienia od opłat, jak również tryb ich pobierania. Jednocześnie zaznaczam, iż zgodnie z art. 17 ustawy o pomocy społecznej, organizowanie i świadczenie usług opiekuńczych, w tym specjalistycznych, w miejscu zamieszkania, z wyłączeniem specjalistycznych usług opiekuńczych dla osób z zaburzeniami psychicznymi, jest zadaniem własnym Gminy o charakterze obowiązkowym. reklamaPOLECANEKodeks pracy 2017VAT 2017. Komentarz - SUPERPREMIUMZestaw Eksperta - Wystawianie świadectw pracyKto musi płacić podatek od darowizn i spadków w 2017 r.?Ile może dorobić emeryt od 1 grudnia 2016 r. do 28 lutego 2017 r.Umowy zlecenia 2017 - ewidencja godzin pracy zleceniobiorców (wzór)Okres wypowiedzenia umowy o pracęŚwiadczenie pielęgnacyjne 2017 - nowe przepisyPrzewodnik po zmianach przepisów 2016/2017


text:
 21.3.2013
 BG
 Официален вестник на Европейския съюз
 L 81/18
 РЕШЕНИЕ НА СЪВМЕСТНИЯ КОМИТЕТ НА ЕИП
 No 218/2012
 от 7 декември 2012 година
 за изменение на приложение II (Технически наредби, стандарти, изпитвания и сертифициране) и приложение IV (Енергетика) към Споразумението за ЕИП
 СЪВМЕСТНИЯТ КОМИТЕТ НА ЕИП,
 като взе предвид Споразумението за Европейското икономическо пространство („Споразумението за ЕИП“), и по-специално член 98 от него,
 като има предвид, че:
 (1)
 Делегиран регламент (ЕС) No 1059/2010 на Комисията от 28 септември 2010 г. за допълване на Директива 2010/30/ЕС на Европейския парламент и на Съвета по отношение на енергийното етикетиране на домакински съдомиялни машини (1) следва да бъде включен в Споразумението за ЕИП.
 (2)
 Делегиран регламент (ЕС) No 1060/2010 на Комисията от 28 септември 2010 г. за допълване на Директива 2010/30/ЕС на Европейския парламент и на Съвета по отношение на енергийното етикетиране на домашни хладилни уреди (2) следва да бъде включен в Споразумението за ЕИП.
 (3)
 Делегиран регламент (ЕС) No 1061/2010 на Комисията от 28 септември 2010 г., допълващ Директива 2010/30/ЕС на Европейския парламент и на Съвета по отношение на енергийното етикетиране на битови перални машини (3), поправен в ОВ L 249, 27.9.2011 г., стр. 21 и ОВ L 297, 16.11.2011 г., стр. 72, следва да бъде включен в Споразумението за ЕИП.
 (4)
 Делегиран регламент (ЕС) No 1062/2010 на Комисията от 28 септември 2010 г. за допълване на Директива 2010/30/ЕС на Европейския парламент и на Съвета във връзка с енергийното етикетиране на телевизори (4) следва да бъде включен в Споразумението за ЕИП.
 (5)
 Делегиран регламент (ЕС) No 1059/2010 отменя Директива 97/17/ЕО на Комисията (5), която е включена в Споразумението и която следва да бъде заличена от Споразумението.
 (6)
 Делегиран регламент (ЕС) No 1060/2010 отменя Директива 94/2/ЕО на Комисията (6), която е включена в Споразумението и която следва да бъде заличена от Споразумението.
 (7)
 Делегиран регламент (ЕС) No 1061/2010 отменя Директива 95/12/ЕО на Комисията (7), която е включена в Споразумението и която следва да бъде заличена от Споразумението.
 (8)
 Приложения II и IV към Споразумението за ЕИП следва да бъдат съответно изменени,
 ПРИЕ НАСТОЯЩОТО РЕШЕНИЕ:
 Член 1
 Приложение II към Споразумението за ЕИП се изменя, както следва:
 1.
 В глава IV текстът на точки 4а (Директива 94/2/ЕО на Комисията), 4б (Директива 95/12/ЕО на Комисията) и 4е (Директива 97/17/ЕО на Комисията) се заличава.
 2.
 В глава IV след точка 4з (Директива 2002/31/ЕО на Комисията) се вмъкват следните точки:
 „4и.
 32010 R 1059: Делегиран регламент (ЕС) No 1059/2010 на Комисията от 28 септември 2010 г. за допълване на Директива 2010/30/ЕС на Европейския парламент и на Съвета по отношение на енергийното етикетиране на домакински съдомиялни машини (ОВ L 314, 30.11.2010 г., стр. 1).
 4й.
 32010 R 1060: Делегиран регламент (ЕС) No 1060/2010 на Комисията от 28 септември 2010 г. за допълване на Директива 2010/30/ЕС на Европейския парламент и на Съвета по отношение на енергийното етикетиране на домашни хладилни уреди (ОВ L 314, 30.11.2010 г., стр. 17).
 4к.
 32010 R 1061: Делегиран регламент (ЕС) No 1061/2010 на Комисията от 28 септември 2010 г., допълващ Директива 2010/30/ЕС на Европейския парламент и на Съвета по отношение на енергийното етикетиране на битови перални машини (ОВ L 314, 30.11.2010 г., стр. 47), поправен в ОВ L 249, 27.9.2011 г., стр. 21 и ОВ L 297, 16.11.2011 г., стр. 72.
 4л.
 32010 R 1062: Делегиран регламент (ЕС) No 1062/2010 на Комисията от 28 септември 2010 г. за допълване на Директива 2010/30/ЕС на Европейския парламент и на Съвета във връзка с енергийното етикетиране на телевизори (ОВ L 314, 30.11.2010 г., стр. 64).“
 3.
 В допълнение 1 текстът на раздел 1 (Директива 94/2/ЕО на Комисията), раздел 2 (Директива 95/12/ЕО на Комисията) и раздел 5 (Директива 97/17/ЕО на Комисията) се заличава.
 4.
 В допълнение 2 текстът на раздел 1 (Директива 94/2/ЕО на Комисията), раздел 2 (Директива 95/12/ЕО на Комисията) и раздел 5 (Директива 97/17/ЕО на Комисията) се заличава.
 Член 2
 Приложение IV към Споразумението се изменя, както следва:
 1.
 Текстът на точки 11а (Директива 94/2/ЕО на Комисията), 11б (Директива 95/12/ЕО на Комисията) и 11е (Директива 97/17/ЕО на Комисията) се заличава.
 2.
 След точка 11з (Директива 2002/31/ЕО на Комисията) се вмъкват следните точки:
 „11и.
 32010 R 1059: Делегиран регламент (ЕС) No 1059/2010 на Комисията от 28 септември 2010 г. за допълване на Директива 2010/30/ЕС на Европейския парламент и на Съвета по отношение на енергийното етикетиране на домакински съдомиялни машини (ОВ L 314, 30.11.2010 г., стр. 1) (8).
 11й.
 32010 R 1060: Делегиран регламент (ЕС) No 1060/2010 на Комисията от 28 септември 2010 г. за допълване на Директива 2010/30/ЕС на Европейския парламент и на Съвета по отношение на енергийното етикетиране на домашни хладилни уреди (ОВ L 314, 30.11.2010 г., стр. 17) (8).
 11к.
 32010 R 1061: Делегиран регламент (ЕС) No 1061/2010 на Комисията от 28 септември 2010 г., допълващ Директива 2010/30/ЕС на Европейския парламент и на Съвета по отношение на енергийното етикетиране на битови перални машини (ОВ L 314, 30.11.2010 г., стр. 47), поправен в ОВ L 249, 27.9.2011 г., стр. 21 и ОВ L 297, 16.11.2011 г., стр. 72
 (8).
 11л.
 32010 R 1062: Делегиран регламент (ЕС) No 1062/2010 на Комисията от 28 септември 2010 г. за допълване на Директива 2010/30/ЕС на Европейския парламент и на Съвета във връзка с енергийното етикетиране на телевизори (ОВ L 314, 30.11.2010 г., стр. 64) (8).
 3.
 В допълнение 5 текстът на раздел 1 (Директива 94/2/ЕО на Комисията), раздел 2 (Директива 95/12/ЕО на Комисията) и раздел 5 (Директива 97/17/ЕО на Комисията) се заличава.
 4.
 В допълнение 6 текстът на раздел 1 (Директива 94/2/ЕО на Комисията), раздел 2 (Директива 95/12/ЕО на Комисията) и раздел 5 (Директива 97/17/ЕО на Комисията) се заличава.
 Член 3
 Текстовете на делегирани регламенти (ЕС) No 1059/2010, (ЕС) No 1060/2010, (ЕС) No 1061/2010, поправен в ОВ L 249, 27.9.2011 г., стр. 21 и ОВ L 297, 16.11.2011 г., стр. 72, и (ЕС) No 1062/2010 на исландски и норвежки език, които ще бъдат публикувани в притурката за ЕИП към Официален вестник на Европейския съюз, са автентични.
 Член 4
 Настоящото решение влиза в сила на 8 декември 2012 г., при условие че всички нотификации, предвидени в член 103, параграф 1 от Споразумението за ЕИП, са внесени в Съвместния комитет на ЕИП (9), или на датата, на която влиза в сила Решение на Съвместния комитет No 217/2012 от 7 декември 2012 г. (10), ако тази дата е по-късна.
 Член 5
 Настоящото решение се публикува в раздела за ЕИП и в притурката за ЕИП към Официален вестник на Европейския съюз.
 Съставено в Брюксел на 7 декември 2012 година.
 За Съвместния комитет на ЕИП
 Председател
 Atle LEIKVOLL
 (1) ОВ L 314, 30.11.2010 г., стр. 1.
 (2) ОВ L 314, 30.11.2010 г., стр. 17.
 (3) ОВ L 314, 30.11.2010 г., стр. 47.
 (4) ОВ L 314, 30.11.2010 г., стр. 64.
 (5) ОВ L 118, 7.5.1997 г., стр. 1.
 (6) ОВ L 45, 17.2.1994 г., стр. 1.
 (7) ОВ L 136, 21.6.1995 г., стp. 1.
 (8) Посочен тук единствено с информационна цел: във връзка с прилагането вж. приложение II относно техническите наредби, стандарти, изпитвания и сертифициране.
 (9) Без отбелязани конституционни изисквания.
 (10) Вж. стр. 17 от настоящия брой на Официален вестник.


text:
 14.1.2009
 CS
 Úřední věstník Evropské unie
 L 9/43
 ROZHODNUTÍ RADY PŘIDRUŽENÍ EU-MAROKO č. 1/2008
 ze dne 26. listopadu 2008
 o zřízení Výboru pro celní spolupráci, přijetí jednacího řádu skupiny pro hospodářský dialog a změně jednacích řádů některých podvýborů Výboru pro přidružení
 (2009/21/ES)
 RADA PŘIDRUŽENÍ,
 s ohledem na Evropsko-středomořskou dohodu zakládající přidružení mezi Evropskými společenstvími a jejich členskými státy na jedné straně a Marockým královstvím na straně druhé (1) (dále jen „dohoda o přidružení“),
 s ohledem na rozhodnutí Rady přidružení EU-Maroko č. 1/2003 ze dne 24. února 2003 o zřízení podvýborů Výboru pro přidružení (2), a zejména na čtvrtý pododstavec jediného článku uvedeného rozhodnutí,
 s ohledem na doporučení Rady přidružení EU-Maroko č. 1/2005 ze dne 24. října 2005 o provedení akčního plánu EU-Maroko (3),
 vzhledem k těmto důvodům:
 (1)
 Zvyšuje se komplexnost vztahů mezi EU a Marokem, která je důsledkem provádění dohody o přidružení a akčního plánu EU-Maroko přijatého v rámci politiky sousedství.
 (2)
 Obě strany jsou odhodlány dále prohlubovat své vztahy a otevřít pro tyto vztahy nové perspektivy.
 (3)
 Je třeba sledovat provádění priorit partnerství a sbližování právních předpisů. Pravomoci Evropské unie vymezují rámec, na základě kterého se mohou vztahy a spolupráce se zeměmi Středomoří rozvíjet s ohledem na celkovou soudržnost a vyrovnanost Barcelonského procesu.
 (4)
 Rozhodnutím Rady přidružení EU-Maroko č. 2/2005 ze dne 18. listopadu 2005, kterým se mění protokol č. 4 o definici pojmu „původní produkty“ a o metodách správní spolupráce k Evropsko-středomořské dohodě (4), se zrušil odkaz na Výbor pro celní spolupráci. Je tedy třeba pro fungování Výboru pro celní spolupráci vytvořit nový právní základ.
 (5)
 Článek 84 dohody o přidružení stanoví, že budou zřízeny pracovní skupiny nebo orgány nezbytné pro provádění dohody.
 (6)
 Ustanovení čl. 44 písm. a) dohody o přidružení ustavilo hospodářský dialog mezi Evropskou unií a Marokem. Je třeba přijmout jednací řád skupiny pro hospodářský dialog.
 (7)
 Z dohody o akčním plánu EU-Maroko sousedství vyplynuly nové oblasti dialogu a spolupráce. Tyto oblasti nejsou všechny pokryty prostřednictvím podvýborů zřízených rozhodnutím Rady přidružení č. 1/2003.
 (8)
 Je třeba zajistit, že všechna témata dohody o přidružení a akčního plánu EU-Maroko sledují příslušné podvýbory,
 ROZHODLA TAKTO:
 Článek 1
 Při Výboru pro přidružení se zřizuje Výbor pro celní spolupráci EU-Maroko, jehož úkolem je sledovat provádění dohody o přidružení a akčního plánu EU-Maroko, který byl dohodnut v rámci politiky sousedství, zajišťovat správní spolupráci s cílem uplatňování protokolu č. 4 k dohodě o přidružení a vykonávat veškeré další úkoly v celní oblasti, které mu mohou být svěřeny.
 Jednací řád Výboru pro celní spolupráci je obsažen v příloze I.
 Výbor pro celní spolupráci pracuje na základě zmocnění Výboru přidružení, kterému po každém zasedání podává zprávu. Výbor pro celní spolupráci nemá rozhodovací pravomoc. Může nicméně podávat doporučení s cílem usnadnit řádné provádění dohody o přidružení a předkládat Výboru pro přidružení návrhy. Tato doporučení a návrhy se přijímají vzájemnou dohodou.
 Výbor pro přidružení přijímá veškerá další opatření nezbytná pro zajištění řádného fungování výboru a informuje o nich Radu přidružení.
 Článek 2
 Přijímá se jednací řád skupiny pro hospodářský dialog, který byl ustaven čl. 44 písm. a) dohody o přidružení. Jednací řád je obsažen v příloze II.
 Skupina pro hospodářský dialog pracuje na základě zmocnění Výboru přidružení, kterému po každém zasedání podává zprávu. Skupina nemá rozhodovací pravomoc. Může nicméně předkládat Výboru pro přidružení doporučení.
 Výbor pro přidružení přijímá veškerá další opatření nezbytná pro zajištění řádného fungování skupiny a informuje o nich Radu přidružení.
 Článek 3
 Seznamy témat, kterými se zabývají podvýbory Výboru pro přidružení č. 1 „Vnitřní trh“, č. 2 „Průmysl, obchod a služby“, č. 3 „Doprava, životní prostředí a energetika“, č. 4 „Zemědělství a rybolov“ a č. 5 „Spravedlnost a bezpečnost“, jak jsou uvedeny v příloze II bodě 3 jednacích řádů podvýborů přijatých rozhodnutím Rady přidružení č. 1/2003, se mění v souladu s přílohou III tohoto rozhodnutí.
 Článek 4
 Toto rozhodnutí vstupuje v platnost dnem přijetí.
 V Bruselu dne 26. listopadu 2008.
 Za Radu přidružení
 předseda
 M. NICOLAIDIS
 (1) Úř. věst. L 70, 18.3.2000, s. 2.
 (2) Úř. věst. L 79, 26.3.2003, s. 14.
 (3) Úř. věst. L 285, 28.10.2005, s. 49.
 (4) Úř. věst. L 336, 21.12.2005, s. 1.
 PŘÍLOHA I
 JEDNACÍ ŘÁD VÝBORU PRO CELNÍ SPOLUPRÁCI EU–MAROKO
 1. Složení a předsednictví
 Výbor pro celní spolupráci EU-Maroko (dále jen „výbor“) tvoří zástupci Evropské komise, kterým jsou nápomocni odborníci z celní oblasti z členských států a zástupci z celní oblasti (nebo jiní zástupci vlády) Maroka. Výboru střídavě předsedá zástupce celních orgánů Maroka a zástupce Evropského společenství.
 2. Úloha
 Výbor pracuje na základě zmocnění Výboru pro přidružení, kterému po každém zasedání podává zprávu. Výbor nemá rozhodovací pravomoc. Může však podávat návrhy Výboru pro přidružení.
 3. Témata
 Výbor posuzuje provádění dohody o přidružení a akčního plánu EU-Maroko přijatého v rámci politiky sousedství, pokud jde o veškeré otázky z celní oblasti. Zejména hodnotí pokrok při sbližování, provádění a uplatňování právních předpisů. Případně projednává spolupráci v oblasti veřejné správy. Výbor přezkoumává veškeré problémy, které mohou vyvstat v celní oblasti (zejména týkající se pravidel původu, obecných celních postupů, celní nomenklatury, celní hodnoty zboží, sazebních režimů, celní spolupráce), a případně navrhuje opatření, která je třeba přijmout. Na žádost Výboru pro přidružení se výbor může zabývat i jinými tématy, včetně horizontálních otázek.
 Výbor se na svém zasedání může zabývat otázkami týkajícími se jedné, více nebo všech otázek z celní oblasti.
 4. Sekretariát
 Úředník Evropské komise a úředník marocké vlády jednají společně jako stálí tajemníci výboru.
 Těmto tajemníkům se předávají veškerá sdělení týkající se výboru.
 5. Zasedání
 Zasedání výboru se konají vždy, když to vyžadují okolnosti, nejméně však jednou ročně. Zasedání může být svoláno na základě žádosti jedné nebo druhé strany, jejíž tajemník předá žádost druhé straně. Po obdržení žádosti o zasedání výboru odpoví tajemník druhé strany ve lhůtě patnácti pracovních dní.
 V mimořádně naléhavých případech může být zasedání výboru svoláno v kratší lhůtě, na které se obě strany dohodnou. Všechny žádosti o svolání zasedání musí být předány písemně.
 Každé zasedání výboru se koná v den a na místě, na kterých se obě strany dohodnou.
 Zasedání svolá za každou stranu příslušný tajemník na základě dohody s předsedou. Před každým zasedáním je předseda informován o plánovaném složení delegace každé strany.
 Se souhlasem obou stran může výbor přizvat na svá zasedání jiné zástupce z příslušných technických oddělení obou stran nebo zástupce přidružené pro horizontální otázky a rovněž odborníky, aby mohli poskytnout výboru specifické informace.
 6. Pořad jednání
 Všechny žádosti o zařazení bodů na pořad jednání výboru se podávají tajemníkům výboru.
 Předseda vypracuje pro každé zasedání předběžný pořad jednání. Tajemník výboru ho předá druhé straně nejpozději deset dní před začátkem zasedání.
 Předběžný pořad jednání obsahuje body, ke kterým tajemníci obdrželi žádosti o jejich zařazení nejpozději patnáct dní před začátkem zasedání. Podklady musí obě strany obdržet nejméně sedm dní před začátkem zasedání. Se souhlasem obou stran mohou být tyto lhůty zkráceny pro zohlednění zvláštních případů nebo neodkladných záležitostí.
 Na začátku každého zasedání schválí výbor pořad jednání.
 7. Zápis
 Zprávu z jednání sepíší a schválí oba tajemníci po ukončení každého zasedání. Tajemníci výboru předají kopii zprávy včetně návrhů výboru tajemníkům a předsedovi Výboru pro přidružení.
 8. Veřejnost jednání
 Není-li rozhodnuto jinak, jsou zasedání výboru neveřejná.
 PŘÍLOHA II
 JEDNACÍ ŘÁD SKUPINY PRO HOSPODÁŘSKÝ DIALOG EU-MAROKO
 1. Složení a předsednictví
 Skupinu pro hospodářský dialog (dále jen „skupina“) tvoří zástupci Evropské komise a zástupci vlády Maroka a společně jí předsedají obě strany. Členské státy jsou o zasedáních skupiny informovány a jsou na tato zasedání zvány.
 2. Úloha
 Skupina je fórem pro diskusi, konzultace a sledování. Pracuje na základě zmocnění Výboru pro přidružení, kterému po každém zasedání podává zprávu. Skupina nemá rozhodovací pravomoc. Může však podávat návrhy Výboru pro přidružení.
 3. Témata
 Skupina je fórem pro diskusi o makroekonomických otázkách. Rovněž posuzuje provádění dohody o přidružení a akčního plánu EU-Maroko přijatého v rámci politiky sousedství, především v níže vyjmenovaných odvětvích, zejména pokud jde o pokrok při sbližování, provádění a uplatňování právních předpisů. V případě potřeby posuzuje spolupráci v oblasti veřejné správy. Skupina projednává veškeré problémy, které mohou vyvstat v níže uvedených oblastech, a případně navrhuje opatření, která je třeba přijmout.
 a)
 Makroekonomický rámec
 b)
 Strukturální reformy
 c)
 Finanční sektor a kapitálový trh (makroekonomické aspekty)
 d)
 Pohyb kapitálu a běžných plateb
 e)
 Správa a kontrola veřejných financí
 f)
 Daně
 g)
 Statistika
 Tento seznam není vyčerpávající a Výbor pro přidružení k němu může připojit další témata včetně horizontálních otázek.
 Skupina se na svém zasedání může zabývat otázkami týkajícími se jednoho, více nebo všech výše uvedených odvětví.
 4. Sekretariát
 Úředník Evropské komise a úředník marocké vlády jednají společně jako stálí tajemníci skupiny.
 Těmto tajemníkům se předávají veškerá sdělení týkající se skupiny.
 5. Zasedání
 Zasedání skupiny se konají vždy, když to vyžadují okolnosti, nejméně však jednou ročně. Zasedání může být svoláno na základě žádosti jedné nebo druhé strany, jejíž tajemník předá žádost druhé straně. Po obdržení žádosti o zasedání odpoví tajemník druhé strany ve lhůtě patnácti pracovních dní.
 V mimořádně naléhavých případech může být zasedání skupiny svoláno v kratší lhůtě, na které se obě strany dohodnou. Všechny žádosti o svolání zasedání musí být předány písemně.
 Zasedání skupiny se konají střídavě v Bruselu a v Rabatu v den, na kterém se obě strany dohodnou.
 Zasedání svolává za každou stranu příslušný tajemník na základě dohody s předsedou. Před každým zasedáním je předseda informován o plánovaném složení delegace každé strany.
 Se souhlasem obou stran může skupina přizvat na svá zasedání odborníky, aby mohli poskytnout specifické informace.
 6. Pořad jednání
 Všechny žádosti o zařazení bodů na pořad jednání skupiny se podávají tajemníkům skupiny.
 Spolupředsedové vypracovávají střídavě pro každé zasedání předběžný pořad jednání. Tajemník skupiny ho předá druhé straně nejpozději deset dní před začátkem zasedání.
 Předběžný pořad jednání obsahuje body, ke kterým tajemníci obdrželi žádosti o jejich zařazení nejpozději patnáct dní před začátkem zasedání. Podklady musí obě strany obdržet nejméně sedm dní před začátkem zasedání. Se souhlasem obou stran mohou být tyto časové lhůty zkráceny pro zohlednění zvláštních případů nebo neodkladných záležitostí.
 Na začátku každého zasedání schválí skupina pořad jednání.
 7. Zápis
 Zprávu z jednání sepíší a schválí oba tajemníci po ukončení každého zasedání. Tajemníci skupiny předají kopii zprávy včetně návrhů skupiny tajemníkům a předsedovi Výboru pro přidružení.
 8. Veřejnost jednání
 Není-li rozhodnuto jinak, jsou zasedání skupiny neveřejná.
 PŘÍLOHA III
 A. JEDNACÍ ŘÁD PODVÝBORU EU-MAROKO č. 1 „VNITŘNÍ TRH“
 Seznam odvětví, jimiž se podvýbor zabývá, uvedený v bodě 3 „Témata“ přílohy II rozhodnutí Rady přidružení č. 1/2003, se nahrazuje tímto:
 „a)
 Standardizace, certifikace, posuzování shody a tržní dohled (aspekty, které nesouvisí s obchodními dohodami v těchto oblastech)
 b)
 Hospodářská soutěž a státní podpory
 c)
 Práva duševního, průmyslového a obchodního vlastnictví
 d)
 Veřejné zakázky
 e)
 Ochrana spotřebitele
 f)
 Služby (regulatorní otázky) včetně poštovních a finančních služeb
 g)
 Právo společností a právo usazování“.
 B. JEDNACÍ ŘÁD PODVÝBORU EU-MAROKO č. 2 „PRŮMYSL, OBCHOD A SLUŽBY“
 Seznam odvětví, jimiž se podvýbor zabývá, uvedený v bodě 3 „Témata“ přílohy II rozhodnutí Rady přidružení č. 1/2003, se nahrazuje tímto:
 „a)
 Průmyslová spolupráce a politika podnikání
 b)
 Obchodní problematika
 c)
 Obchod se službami a právo usazování
 d)
 Cestovní ruch a řemeslná výroba
 e)
 Příprava obchodních dohod o technických pravidlech, standardizaci, normách a posuzování shody
 f)
 Ochrana údajů
 g)
 Obchodní statistiky“.
 C. JEDNACÍ ŘÁD PODVÝBORU EU-MAROKO č. 3 „DOPRAVA, ŽIVOTNÍ PROSTŘEDÍ A ENERGETIKA“
 Seznam odvětví, jimiž se podvýbor zabývá, uvedený v bodě 3 „Témata“ přílohy II rozhodnutí Rady přidružení č. 1/2003, se nahrazuje tímto:
 „a)
 Doprava: zejména modernizace a rozvoj infrastruktury, posílení zabezpečení a bezpečnosti všech způsobů dopravy, kontrola a správa přístavů a letišť, zlepšení multimodálního systému, včetně otázky interoperability.
 b)
 Životní prostředí: zejména posílení kapacit v oblasti správy životního prostředí, z institucionálního a právního hlediska, posílení boje proti různým formám znečištění; podpora začlenění ochrany životního prostředí mezi prioritní oblasti evropsko-středomořského partnerství za účelem trvale udržitelného rozvoje; provádění národních programů ochrany životního prostředí, zejména těch, které se týkají nakládání s tekutými a tuhými odpady; posílení regionální a mezinárodní spolupráce, zejména v oblasti změn klimatu.
 c)
 Energetika: zejména modernizace a rozvoj infrastruktury, bezpečnost a zabezpečení infrastruktur a přepravy energie, řízení poptávky, podpora energie z obnovitelných zdrojů, výzkum a spolupráce, pokud jde o výměnu údajů.“
 D. JEDNACÍ ŘÁD PODVÝBORU EU-MAROKO č. 5 „ZEMĚDĚLSTVÍ A RYBOLOV“
 Seznam odvětví, jimiž se podvýbor zabývá, uvedený v bodě 3 „Témata“ přílohy II rozhodnutí Rady přidružení č. 1/2003, se nahrazuje tímto:
 „a)
 Zemědělské produkty a rybolov
 b)
 Zemědělská spolupráce a rozvoj venkova
 c)
 Zpracované zemědělské produkty
 d)
 Veterinární a rostlinolékařské záležitosti
 e)
 Právní předpisy použitelné na směnu těchto produktů“.
 E. JEDNACÍ ŘÁD PODVÝBORU EU-MAROKO č. 6 „SPRAVEDLNOST A BEZPEČNOST“
 Seznam odvětví, jimiž se podvýbor zabývá, uvedený v bodě 3 „Témata“ přílohy II rozhodnutí Rady přidružení č. 1/2003, se nahrazuje tímto:
 „a)
 Spolupráce v oblasti spravedlnosti
 b)
 Justiční spolupráce v civilních a trestních věcech
 c)
 Spolupráce v boji proti organizovanému zločinu, včetně obchodování s lidmi, obchodování s drogami, terorismu, korupce a legalizace výnosů trestné činnosti
 d)
 Policejní spolupráce“.


text:
 Pomembno pravno obvestilo
 |
 21984A0609(02)
 Uradni list L 154 , 09/06/1984 str. 0039 - 0040
 Izmenjava Pisemv zvezi s točko 2 izmenjave pisem med Evropsko gospodarsko skupnostjo in Ljudsko Republiko Bolgarijo o trgovini v sektorju ovčjega in kozjega mesaPismo št. 1Spoštovani!V zvezi z izmenjavo pisem med Ljudsko republiko Bolgarijo in Evropsko gospodarsko skupnostjo o trgovini v sektorju ovčjega in kozjega mesa, podpisanih 26. januarja 1982, in z v zvezi z dogovarjanjem, ki je med pogodbenicama potekalo v skladu s točko 12 izmenjave pisem, vas imam čast obvestiti, da bo med veljavnostjo sporazuma Vlada Ljudske republike Bolgarije še naprej zagotavljala, da bo trženje bolgarskih proizvodov znotraj Skupnosti potekalo tako, da se izogne spremembam trendov v tradicionalnih trgovinskih tokovih na določenih tržnih območjih, ki se štejejo za občutljiva.Pristojni organi Ljudske republike Bolgarije bodo zlasti zagotovili, da bo izvoz v Francijo in Irsko omejen na naslednje količine:Za leto 1984:- Francija: 360 ton, ekvivalentno masi klavnega trupa,- Irska: nič.Za naslednja leta:količina, ki se določi s sporazumom v okviru posvetovanj, predvidenih v točki 9 sporazuma.Bil bi vam hvaležen, če bi potrdili prejem tega pisma.Sprejmite, prosim, izraze mojega najglobljega spoštovanja.Za VladoLjudske republike BolgarijePismo št. 2Spoštovani!Čast imam potrditi prejem vašega pisma z današnjim datumom, ki se glasi:"V zvezi z izmenjavo pisem med Ljudsko republiko Bolgarijo in Evropsko gospodarsko skupnostjo o trgovini v sektorju ovčjega in kozjega mesa, podpisanih 26. januarja 1982, in z v zvezi z dogovarjanjem, ki je med pogodbenicama potekalo v skladu s točko 12 izmenjave pisem, vas imam čast obvestiti, da bo med veljavnostjo sporazuma Vlada Ljudske republike Bolgarije še naprej zagotavljala, da bo trženje bolgarskih proizvodov znotraj Skupnosti potekalo tako, da se izogne spremembam trendov v tradicionalnih trgovinskih tokovih na določenih tržnih območjih, ki se štejejo za občutljiva.Pristojni organi Ljudske republike Bolgarije bodo zlasti zagotovili, da bo izvoz v Francijo in Irsko omejen na naslednje količine:Za leto 1984:- Francija: 360 ton, ekvivalentno masi klavnega trupa,- Irska: nič.Za naslednja leta:količina, ki se določi s sporazumom v okviru posvetovanj, predvidenih v točki 9 sporazuma.Bil bi vam hvaležen, če bi potrdili prejem tega pisma."Sprejmite, prosim, izraze mojega najglobljega spoštovanja.V imenuSveta Evropskih skupnosti--------------------------------------------------


text:
 Avis juridique important
 |
 11951K/PRO/CJ/25
 VERTRAG UEBER DIE GRUENDUNG DER EUROPAEISCHEN GEMEINSCHAFT FUER KOHLE UND STAHL ( EGKS ), PROTOKOLL UEBER DIE SATZUNG DES GERICHTSHOFES DER EUROPAEISCHEN GEMEINSCHAFT FUER KOHLE UND STAHL, DRITTER TITEL: VERFAHREN, UNTERSUCHUNGSMASSNAHMEN
 ++++ ARTIKEL 25 DER GERICHTSHOF KANN JEDERZEIT PERSONEN, KÖRPERSCHAFTEN, DIENSTSTELLEN, AUSSCHÜSSE ODER ORGANE NACH SEINER WAHL MIT DER VORNAHME VON UNTERSUCHUNGEN ODER DER ABGABE EINES GUTACHTENS BETRAUEN ; ZU DIESEM ZWECK KANN ER EINE LISTE DER ALS SACHVERSTÄNDIGE ZUGELASSENEN PERSONEN ODER ORGANISATIONEN AUFSTELLEN .