type: legislation

text:
 |
 52013PC0159
 Togra le haghaidh RIALACHÁIN Ó PHARLAIMINT NA hEORPA AGUS ÓN gCOMHAIRLE maidir le ráta coigeartaithe i leith na n-íocaíochtaí díreacha dá bhforáiltear i Rialachán (CE) Uimh. 73/2009 a shocrú i ndáil leis an mbliain féilire 2013 /* COM/2013/0159 final - 2013/0087 (COD) */
 MEABHRÁN MÍNIÚCHÁIN
 1. COMHTHÉACS AN TOGRA
 Leagtar síos leis an gConradh ar Fheidhmiú an
 Aontais Eorpaigh an riail bhunúsach maidir le rialú airgeadas an Aontais, is é
 sin go gcaithfidh buiséad bliantúil an Aontais cloí leis an gCreat Airgeadais
 Ilbhliantúil. D’fhonn a áirithiú go mbeidh na méideanna a bhaineann le maoiniú
 an Chomhbheartais Talmhaíochta ag cloí leis na fo‐uasteorainneacha
 bliantúla atá leagtha síos do chaiteachas a bhaineann leis an margadh agus
 d’íocaíochtaí díreacha faoi cheannteideal 2 den Rialachán atá le glacadh ag an gComhairle
 de bhun Airteagal 312(2) den Chonradh ar Fheidhmiú an Aontais Eorpaigh,
 rinneadh foráil maidir le sásra smachta airgeadais le Rialachán (CE) Uimh. 73/2009
 ón gComhairle lena mbunaítear comhrialacha do scéimeanna tacaíochta dírí
 d'fheirmeoirí faoin gComhbheartas Talmhaíochta agus lena mbunaítear scéimeanna
 tacaíochta áirithe d'fheirmeoirí[1].
 De réir an tsásra sin, ba chóir an coigeartú ar leibhéal na n‐íocaíochtaí
 díreacha a chinneadh aon uair a thaispeánann na réamh‐mheastacháin maidir
 le maoiniú na n‐íocaíochtaí díreacha agus an chaiteachais a bhaineann
 leis an margadh, go rachfar os cionn na fo‐uasteorann bliantúla a leagtar
 síos faoi cheannteideal 2 den Chreat Airgeadais; ní mór na haistrithe caipitil
 idir an Ciste Eorpach um Ráthaíocht Talmhaíochta (CERT) agus an Ciste Eorpach
 Talmhaíochta um Fhorbairt Tuaithe (CETFT) a thabhairt san áireamh sna
 réamh-mheastacháin sin.
 Agus Dréachtbhuiséad 2014 á tharraingt suas,
 ba léir ó na chéad mheastacháin bhuiséadacha ar íocaíochtaí díreacha agus ar chaiteachas
 a bhaineann leis an margadh, gur dhócha go rachfaí thar an bhfo‐uasteorainn
 a leagtar síos faoi cheannteideal 2 don bhliain 2014; tugadh na haistrithe
 caipitil idir an CERT agus an CETFT san áireamh sna meastacháin sin. Dá dheasca
 sin, ba chóir leibhéal na n‐íocaíochtaí díreacha a laghdú chun cloí leis
 an uasteorainn.
 Ar an mbonn sin, tá an Coimisiún ag tíolacadh
 togra maidir leis an ráta coigeartaithe a shocrú d'íocaíochtaí díreacha na
 bliana féilire 2013, togra atá le glacadh ag Parlaimint na hEorpa agus ag an gComhairle
 faoin 30 Meitheamh 2013 i gcomhréir le hAirteagal 11(1) de Rialachán (CE) Uimh. 73/2009
 ón gComhairle arna leasú le Rialachán (AE) Uimh. 671/2012 ó Pharlaimint na
 hEorpa agus ón gComhairle[2].
 Mura socraítear an ráta coigeartaithe sin faoin 30 Meitheamh 2013, áfach,
 leagfaidh an Coimisiún síos an ráta sin de bhun Airteagal 18(4) de
 Rialachán (CE) Uimh. 1290/2005 ón gComhairle maidir le maoiniú an Chomhbheartais
 Talmhaíochta[3].
 Le cois é a bheith ar chumas an Choimisiúin an
 ráta coigeartaithe a leagtar síos leis an Rialachán seo a chinneadh, tugann Airteagal 18(5)
 de Rialachán (CE) Uimh. 1290/2005 caoi don Choimisiún a mholadh go ndéanfaí
 an ráta sin a ath‐oiriúnú i bhfianaise aon fhaisnéis nua a thiocfaidh ar
 a aird. Nuair a bheidh an Coimisiún ag ullmhú na Litreach Leasaithí maidir le
 Dréachtbhuiséad 2014 i nDeireadh Fómhair 2013, déanfaidh an Coimisiún
 athbhreithniú ar a réamh‐mheastacháin maidir le caiteachas a bhaineann
 leis an margadh agus maidir le híocaíochtaí díreacha, agus molfaidh sé an ráta
 coigeartaithe a ath‐oiriúnú más cuí sin. Féadfaidh an Chomhairle an ráta
 coigeartaithe a ghlacadh faoin 1 Nollaig 2013.
 2. TORTHAÍ AN CHOMHAIRLIÚCHÁIN
 LEIS NA PÁIRTITHE LEASMHARA agus measúnuithe tionchair
 Cuireann an togra seo i bhfeidhm na rialacha a
 ndéantar foráil maidir leo le hAirteagal 11 de Rialachán (CE) Uimh. 73/2009
 ón gComhairle agus le hAirteagal 18 de Rialachán (CE) Uimh. 1290/2005
 ón gComhairle. Ní raibh sé riachtanach dul i gcomhairle roimh ré leis na
 páirtithe leasmhara ná measúnuithe tionchair a ullmhú.
 3. EILIMINTÍ DLÍ AN TOGRA
 Leagtar síos leis an togra seo céatadán an
 ráta coigeartaithe don smacht airgeadais don bhliain féilire 2013.
 Ó tharla go bhféadann na Ballstáit íocaíochtaí
 déanacha a dhéanamh le feirmeoirí, is é sin íocaíochtaí tar éis don tréimhse rialála
 íocaíochta is infheidhme maidir le híocaíochtaí díreacha dul in éag, agus ó
 tharla gurbh fhéidir go n‐athródh an ráta coigeartaithe don smacht
 airgeadais ó bhliain féilire go chéile, níor cheart go ndéanfadh amú na n‐íocaíochtaí
 aon difríocht, ar feadh a mbaineann leis an smacht airgeadais, do mhéideanna na
 n‐íocaíochtaí díreacha a dheontar d’fheirmeoirí. Dá bhrí sin, d’fhonn cóir
 chomhionann ar fheirmeoirí a áirithiú, ba chóir an ráta coigeartaithe a chur i
 bhfeidhm maidir le méideanna na n‐íocaíochtaí díreacha atá le deonú
 d'fheirmeoirí i ndáil le hiarratais arna gcur isteach le linn na bliana féilire
 2013, ionas go mbeidh méid na n‐íocaíochtaí neamhspleách ar an am a íocfar
 leis na feirmeoirí iad.
 Is cúis imní fós don Chomhbheartas
 Talmhaíochta go bhfuil éagothromas idir thairbhithe beaga agus móra i ndáileadh
 na n‐íocaíochtaí. Moltar leis an togra seo go gcuirfí an ráta
 coigeartaithe don smacht airgeadais i bhfeidhm ar mhéideanna níos mó ná EUR 5 000
 d'fhonn cuidiú le baint amach an chuspóra dáileadh na n‐íocaíochtaí a
 bheith níos cothroime. Tá sin ag teacht leis an méid a moladh, i dtaca leis an
 smacht airgeadais, i gcomhthéacs an athchóirithe ar an gComhbheartas Talmhaíochta
 a dhéantar le hAirteagal 8 den togra ón gCoimisiún le haghaidh Rialacháin
 (AE) lena mbunaítear rialacha le haghaidh íocaíochtaí díreacha d'fheirmeoirí
 faoi scéimeanna tacaíochta faoi chuimsiú an chomhbheartais talmhaíochta[4].
 Sa Bhulgáir, sa Rómáin agus sa Chróit, faoi
 réir a haontachais agus ó dháta an aontachais sin, tá íocaíochtaí díreacha á
 gceimniú isteach le linn na bliana féilire 2013, agus dá bhrí sin, ní bhainfidh
 an smacht airgeadais leo.
 4. IMPLEACHT BHUISÉADACH
 Cuid d’ullmhúchán Dhréachtbhuiséad 2014 is ea
 ríomh an ráta coigeartaithe don smacht airgeadais, agus ríomhtar an ráta sin
 chun cloí leis an bhfo‐uasteorainn don bhliain airgeadais 2014 ar
 chaiteachas a bhaineann leis an margadh agus ar íocaíochtaí díreacha, fo‐uasteorainn
 a leagtar síos faoi cheannteideal 2, agus a thugann san áireamh na haistrithe
 idir an CERT agus an CETFT a leagtar amach i gConclúidí na Comhairle Eorpaí (7–8
 Feabhra 2013) maidir leis an gCreat Airgeadais Ilbhliantúil[5]. Is éard a leagtar síos sna
 Conclúidí sin gur faoi cheannteideal 2 a chuimsítear an cúlchiste
 géarchéimeanna, agus go mbunófar é trí laghduithe a dhéanamh ag tús gach bliana
 ar na híocaíochtaí díreacha agus trí bhíthin an tsásra smachta airgeadais.
 Na chéad mheastacháin a rinneadh ar na
 leithreasuithe buiséid le haghaidh cabhracha díreacha agus caiteachais a
 bhaineann leis an margadh, thaispeáin siad gur ghá, trí bhíthin an smachta
 airgeadais, laghdú EUR 1471.4 milliún a dhéanamh ar mhéid iomlán na n‐íocaíochtaí
 díreacha is féidir a dheonú d’fheirmeoirí i dtaca leis an mbliain féilire 2013 chun
 cloí leis an bhfo‐uasteorainn don bhliain 2014 mar atá leagtha amach i
 gConclúidí na Comhairle Eorpaí (7–8 Feabhra 2013) maidir leis an gCreat
 Airgeadais Ilbhliantúil agus an fho‐uasteorainn sin arna laghdú faoi na
 méideanna a chuirtear ar fáil don CETFT de bhun Airteagal 10(b) agus 136
 de Rialachán (CE) Uimh. 73/2009 agus de bhun Airteagal 52 den togra
 ón gCoimisiún le haghaidh Rialacháin (AE) lena mbunaítear rialacha le haghaidh
 íocaíochtaí díreacha d'fheirmeoirí faoi scéimeanna tacaíochta faoi chuimsiú an
 chomhbheartais talmhaíochta. Sa laghdú de thoradh smachta airgeadais, áirítear EUR 424.5
 milliún atá ag teastáil chun an cúlchiste géarchéimeanna a bhunú.
 Is é 4.981759% an céatadán a socraíodh le
 haghaidh an ráta coigeartaithe don smacht airgeadais, agus tá an céatadán sin
 riachtanach chun cloí leis an uasteorainn. Ríomhadh é agus é á thabhairt san
 áireamh nach gcuirfear i bhfeidhm é ach ar mhéideanna is mó ná EUR 5 000,
 agus nach gcuirfear i bhfeidhm é sna Ballstáit uile.
 Tríd an ráta coigeartaithe sin a chur i
 bhfeidhm, laghdófar méideanna na n‐íocaíochtaí díreacha sna línte buiséid
 sin a chumhdaíonn caiteachas a bhaineann le hiarratais ó fheirmeoirí i dtaca leis
 an mbliain féilire 2013 (an bhliain airgeadais 2014). EUR 1471.4 milliún,
 is é sin an laghdú iomlán a bheidh mar thoradh ar chur chun feidhme an smachta
 airgeadais.
 5. EILIMINTÍ ROGHNACHA
 Mar bheart réamhchosanta ag an tráth seo, tá
 an ráta coigeartaithe don smacht airgeadais a mholtar sa Rialachán seo bunaithe
 ar Chonclúidí na Comhairle Eorpaí (7–8 Feabhra 2013) maidir leis an gCreat
 Airgeadais Ilbhliantúil. Braithfidh an ráta don smacht airgeadais a ríomhfar ar
 deireadh, áfach, ar an bhfo‐uasteorainn sheasta a leagfar síos faoi
 cheannteideal 2 den Rialachán ón gComhairle lena leagtar síos an creat
 airgeadais ilbhliantúil do na blianta 2014–2020 agus ar an gComhaontú
 Idirinstitiúideach idir Parlaimint na hEorpa, an Chomhairle agus an Coimisiún
 maidir le comhar i gcúrsaí buiséid agus maidir le bainistíocht fhónta
 airgeadais.
 2013/0087 (COD)
 Togra le haghaidh
 RIALACHÁIN Ó PHARLAIMINT NA hEORPA AGUS
 ÓN gCOMHAIRLE
 maidir le ráta coigeartaithe i leith na
 n-íocaíochtaí díreacha dá bhforáiltear i Rialachán (CE) Uimh. 73/2009 a
 shocrú i ndáil leis an mbliain féilire 2013
 TÁ PARLAIMINT NA hEORPA AGUS COMHAIRLE AN AONTAIS
 EORPAIGH
 Ag féachaint don Chonradh ar Fheidhmiú an Aontais Eorpaigh,
 agus go háirithe Airteagal 43(2) de,
 Ag féachaint don togra ón gCoimisiún Eorpach,
 Tar éis dóibh an dréachtghníomh reachtach a chur chuig na
 Parlaimintí náisiúnta,
 [Ag féachaint don tuairim ó Choiste Eacnamaíoch agus
 Sóisialta na hEorpa[6],]
 [Ag féachaint don tuairim ó Choiste na Réigiún[7],]
 Ag gníomhú dóibh i gcomhréir leis an ngnáthnós
 imeachta reachtach,
 De bharr an méid seo a leanas:
 (1) In Airteagal 11(1)
 de Rialachán (CE) Uimh. 73/2009 an 19 Eanáir 2009 lena mbunaítear
 comhrialacha do scéimeanna tacaíochta dírí d'fheirmeoirí faoi chuimsiú an
 chomhbheartais talmhaíochta agus lena mbunaítear scéimeanna áirithe tacaíochta
 d'fheirmeoirí ([8])
 leagtar síos go gcaithfidh, sa bhliain airgeadais 2014, na méideanna atá
 ceaptha an caiteachas a bhaineann leis an margadh agus na híocaíochtaí díreacha
 den Chomhbheartas Talmhaíochta (CBT) a mhaoiniú na huasteorainneacha a urramú
 atá leagtha amach ar mhaithe le cur i bhfeidhm an Rialacháin arna nglacadh ag
 an gComhairle de bhun Airteagal 312(2) den Chonradh ar Fheidhmiú. Leagtar
 síos freisin le hAirteagal 11(1) den Rialachán (CE) Uimh. 73/2009 gur
 gá coigeartú ar na híocaíochtaí díreacha (smacht airgeadais) a chinneadh i gcás
 ina léiríonn na réamh-mheastacháin do mhaoiniú na n-íocaíochtaí díreacha agus
 an chaiteachais a bhaineann leis an margadh, arna shuimiú leis na méideanna atá
 ag eascairt ó Airteagal 10c agus Airteagal 136 den Rialachán seo a
 chur i bhfeidhm ach roimh Airteagal 10a de i a chur bhfeidhm agus gan an EUR 300
 000 000 de chorrlach a chur san áireamh, go sárófar an uasteorainn bhliantúil
 sin. I gcomhréir le hAirteagal 11(2) de Rialachán (CE) Uimh. 73/2009,
 is gá do Pharlaimint na hEorpa agus don Chomhairle an coigeartú sin a chinneadh
 faoin 30 Meitheamh ar bhonn togra ón gCoimisiún arna thíolacadh faoin 31
 Márta ar a dhéanaí den bhliain féilire lena mbaineann an coigeartú.
 (2) Léiríonn na
 réamh-mheastacháin ar na híocaíochtaí díreacha agus ar an gcaiteachas a
 bhaineann leis an margadh arna gcinneadh agus Dréachtbhuiséad 2014 á hullmhú
 gur dócha go sárófar an uasteorainn bhliantúil don Chiste Eorpach um Ráthaíocht
 Talmhaíochta (CERT) don bhliain airgeadais 2014 nuair a chuirtear san áireamh
 an gá le cúlchiste géarchéimeanna a bhunú dá dtagraítear i gConclúidí na
 Comhairle Eorpaí (7–8 Feabhra 2013) maidir leis an gCreat Airgeadais
 Ilbhliantúil. Ba cheart, dá bhrí sin, ráta coigeartaithe i leith na
 n-íocaíochtaí díreacha atá liostaithe in Iarscríbhinn I atá ag gabháil
 leis an Rialachán (CE) Uimh. 73/2009 a chinneadh.
 (3) Is é is gnáthaí, nuair
 a chuireann feirmeoirí iarratas isteach ar chabhair i bhfoirm íocaíochtaí
 díreacha i ndáil le bliain féilire amháin (N), go dtugtar an íocaíocht dóibh
 laistigh de thréimhse sheasta íocaíochta a bhaineann le bliain airgeadais
 (N+1). Mar sin féin, is féidir leis na Ballstáit, laistigh de theorainneacha
 áirithe, íocaíochtaí déanacha a dhéanamh le feirmeoirí tar éis an tréimhse
 íocaíochta sin, gan aon teorainn ama a bheith ann. Is féidir na híocaíochtaí
 sin a bheith ag baint le bliain airgeadais ina dhiaidh sin. I gcás ina
 gcuirtear smacht airgeadais i bhfeidhm maidir le bliain féilire ar leith, níor
 cheart an ráta coigeartaithe a chur i bhfeidhm maidir le híocaíochtaí ar
 cuireadh iarratais ar chabhair isteach ina leith le linn blianta féilire nach
 iad an bhliain a bhfuil feidhm ag an smacht airgeadais léi. Dá bhrí sin,
 d'fhonn cóir chomhionann idir feirmeoirí a áirithiú, is iomchuí foráil a
 dhéanamh gur cheart an ráta coigeartaithe a chur i bhfeidhm maidir le
 híocaíochtaí ar cuireadh iarratais ar chabhair isteach ina leith le linn na
 bliana féilire a bhfuil feidhm ag an smacht airgeadais léi, beag beann ar an
 uair a dhéantar an íocaíocht leis na feirmeoirí.
 (4) Is le linn an
 athchóirithe ar an CBT in 2003 a tugadh an sásra smachta airgeadais agus an
 modhnú isteach. Tá foráil sa dá ionstraim sin maidir le laghdú líneach a
 dhéanamh ar mhéid na n-íocaíochtaí díreacha a dheonófar d'fheirmeoirí. Ag cur
 san áireamh na himpleachtaí a bheadh ag dáileadh neamhchothrom na n-íocaíochtaí
 díreacha idir tairbhithe beaga agus tairbhithe móra, cuireadh an modhnú i
 bhfeidhm maidir le méideanna os cionn EUR 5 000 d'fhonn dáileadh níos
 cothroime íocaíochtaí a bhaint amach. I ndáil leis an mbliain féilire 2013,
 cuirfear an díolúine chéanna atá ann don mhodhnú ar fáil i leith choigeartú na
 n-íocaíochtaí díreacha dá dtagraítear in Airteagal 10(a) de Rialachán (CE)
 Uimh. 73/2009. Ba cheart an smacht airgeadais a chur i bhfeidhm ar
 bhealach comhchosúil d'fhonn cuidiú le baint amach an chuspóra dáileadh na n
 íocaíochtaí a bheith níos cothroime. Is iomchuí, dá bhrí sin, foráil a dhéanamh
 gan an ráta coigeartaithe a chur i bhfeidhm ach maidir le méideanna os cionn EUR 5 000.
 (5) Leagtar síos le hAirteagal 11(3)
 de Rialachán (CE) Uimh. 73/2009 nár cheart, agus sceideal na n-incrimintí
 dá bhforáiltear in Airteagal 121 den Rialachán sin á chur i bhfeidhm
 maidir le gach íocaíocht dhíreach arna deonú sna Ballstáit nua de réir bhrí Airteagal 2(g)
 den Rialachán sin, nár cheart an smacht airgeadais a chur i bhfeidhm maidir
 leis na Ballstáit nua go dtí tús na bliana féilire ina mbeidh leibhéal na
 n-íocaíochtaí díreacha is infheidhme sna Ballstáit nua cothrom ar a laghad le
 leibhéal na n-íocaíochtaí céanna is infheidhme ag an am sin sna Ballstáit eile.
 Toisc go bhfuil na híocaíochtaí díreacha fós faoi réir chur i bhfeidhm sceideal
 na n-incrimintí sa bhliain féilire 2013 sa Bhulgáir agus sa Rómáin, níor cheart
 feidhm a bheith ag an ráta coigeartaithe arna chinneadh leis an Rialachán seo
 maidir le híocaíochtaí le feirmeoirí sna Ballstáit sin.
 (6) Tá oiriúnú déanta ar
 Rialachán (CE) Uimh. 73/2009 ag Acht Aontachais na Cróite. Tá teacht i
 bhfeidhm na leasuithe a thagann ón oiriúnú sin faoi réir theacht i bhfeidhm
 Chonradh Aontachais na Cróite agus ní thiocfaidh siad i bhfeidhm go dtí an dáta
 sin. Toisc go bhfuil an Chróit faoi réir sceideal na n-incrimintí dá
 bhforáiltear in Airteagal 121 de Rialachán (CE) Uimh. 73/2009 sa
 bhliain féilire 2013, níor cheart feidhm a bheith ag an ráta coigeartaithe arna
 chinneadh leis an Rialachán seo maidir le feirmeoirí sa Chróit, faoi réir a
 haontachais agus ó dháta a haontachais.
 TAR ÉIS AN RIALACHÁN SEO A GHLACADH:
 Airteagal 1
 1. Laghdófar de
 4.981759 % méideanna na n-íocaíochtaí díreacha de réir bhrí Airteagal 2(d)
 de Rialachán (CE) Uimh. 73/2009 atá os cionn EUR 5 000 agus a
 dheonófar d'fheirmeoir as iarratas ar chabhair arna cur isteach i ndáil leis an
 mbliain féilire 2013.
 2. Ní bheidh feidhm ag an
 laghdú dá bhforáiltear i mír 1 maidir leis an mBulgáir, maidir leis an Rómáin
 ná maidir leis an gCróit.
 Airteagal 2
 Tiocfaidh an Rialachán seo i bhfeidhm an seachtú lá tar
 éis lá a fhoilsithe in Iris Oifigiúil an Aontais Eorpaigh.
 Ní bheidh feidhm ag Airteagal 1(2) maidir leis an
 gCróit ach faoi réir theacht i bhfeidhm Chonradh Aontachais na Cróite agus ní
 thiocfaidh siad i bhfeidhm go dtí an dáta sin.
 Beidh an Rialachán seo ina cheangal go huile agus
 go hiomlán agus infheidhme go díreach i ngach Ballstát.
 Arna dhéanamh sa Bhruiséil,
 Thar ceann Pharlaimint na hEorpa Thar
 ceann na Comhairle
 An tUachtarán An
 tUachtarán
 RÁITEAS AIRGEADAIS || FS/13/283098
 6.15.2013.1
 || DÁTA: 11.03.2013
 1. || CEANNTEIDEAL BUISÉID: Féach thíos an réamh-mheastachán buiséadach maidir le gach mír tar éis an choigeartaithe (modhnú roimhe seo) agus an smacht airgeadais a chur i bhfeidhm: 05 03 01 01 (An Scéim Íocaíochta Aonair) 05 03 01 02 (An Scéim Íocaíochta Aonair Limistéir) 05 03 01 03 (Íocaíocht ar leith do shiúcra) 05 03 01 04 (Íocaíocht ar leith do thorthaí agus glasraí) 05 03 01 05 (Tacaíocht shonrach Airt. 68 – íocaíocht dhíchúpláilte) 05 03 01 06 (Íocaíocht ar leith do bhogthorthaí ) 05 03 02 06 (Préimh do bha diúil) 05 03 02 07 (Préimh bhreise náisiúnta do bha diúil) 05 03 02 13 (Préimh do chaoirigh agus do ghabhair) 05 03 02 14 (Préimh fhorlíontach do chaoirigh agus do ghabhair) 05 03 02 28 (Cúnamh do sheiriceáin) 05 03 02 39 (Méid breise do tháirgeadh bhiatais siúcra agus cána siúcra) 05 03 02 40 (Cabhair limistéir don chadás) 05 03 02 44 (Tacaíocht shonrach, Airt. 68 – íocaíocht chúpláilte) 05 03 02 50 (POSEI – Cláir thacaíochta pobail) 05 03 02 52 (POSEI – Oileáin Aeigéacha) Líne don chúltaca géarchéimeanna || LEITHREASUITHE: 30,107 m EUR 7,302 m EUR 274 m EUR 12 m EUR 473 m EUR 11 m EUR 882 m EUR 47 m EUR 21 m EUR 7 m EUR 0.5 m EUR 20 m EUR 230 m EUR 987 m EUR 406 m EUR 19 m EUR 424.5 m EUR
 2. || TEIDEAL: Togra le haghaidh RIALACHÁIN Ó PHARLAIMINT NA hEORPA AGUS ÓN gCOMHAIRLE maidir le ráta coigeartaithe i leith na n-íocaíochtaí díreacha dá bhforáiltear i Rialachán (CE) Uimh. 73/2009 a shocrú i ndáil leis an mbliain féilire 2013
 3. || BUNÚS DLÍ: Airteagal 43(2) den Chonradh ar Fheidhmiú an Aontais Eorpaigh
 4. || AIDHMEANNA: Leis an Rialachán seo socraítear an ráta coigeartaithe smachta airgeadais atá le cur i bhfeidhm ar mhéid na n-íocaíochtaí díreacha atá os cionn EUR 5 000 agus a dheonófar d'fheirmeoir as iarratas ar chabhair arna cur isteach i ndáil leis an mbliain féilire 2013.
 5. || IMPLEACHTAÍ AIRGEADAIS || TRÉIMHSE 12 MHÍ (EUR milliún) || BLIAIN AIRGEADAIS REATHA 2013 (EUR milliún) || AN CHÉAD BLIAIN AIRGEADAIS EILE 2014 (EUR milliún)
 5.0 || CAITEACHAS - ARNA GHEARRADH AR BHUISÉAD AN AE (AISÍOCAÍOCHTAÍ/IDIRGHABHÁLACHA) - ÚDARÁIS NÁISIÚNTA - EILE || -1 471.4 + 424.5 || n.b. || -1 471.4 + 424.5
 5.1 || IONCAM - ACMHAINNÍ DÍLSE AN AE (TOBHAIGH/DLEACHTANNA CUSTAIM) - NÁISIÚNTA || || ||
 || || 2015 || 2016 || 2017 || 2018
 5.0.1 || CAITEACHAS MEASTA || || || ||
 5.1.1 || IONCAM MEASTA || || || ||
 5.2 || MODHANNA RÍOMHA: Féach na nótaí tráchta
 6.0 || AN FÉIDIR AN TIONSCADAL A MHAOINIÚ Ó LEITHREASUITHE A CUIREADH ISTEACH SA CHAIBIDIL ÁBHARTHA DEN BHUISÉAD REATHA? || n.b.
 6.1 || AN FÉIDIR AN TIONSCADAL A MHAOINIÚ TRÍ AISTRIÚ A DHÉANAMH IDIR CHAIBIDLÍ AN BHUISÉID REATHA? || n.b.
 6.2 || AN mBEIDH GÁ LE BUISÉAD FORLÍONTACH? || NÍL
 6.3 || AN GÁ LEITHREASUITHE A CHUR ISTEACH I mBUISÉID AMACH ANSEO? || NÍL
 BARÚLACHA: Tá an ríomh an ráta coigeartaithe smachta airgeadais bunaithe ar Chonclúidí na Comhairle Eorpaí (7–8 Feabhra 2013) maidir leis an gCreat Airgeadais Ilbhliantúil. Beidh na himpleachtaí buiséadacha deiridh ag brath ar an bhfo-uasteorainn faoi Cheannteideal 2 arna socrú leis an Rialachán ón gComhairle lena leagtar síos an creat airgeadais ilbhliantúil do na blianta 2014–2020 agus leis an gComhaontú Idirinstitiúideach idir Parlaimint na hEorpa, an Chomhairle agus an Coimisiún maidir le comhar i gcúrsaí buiséid agus maidir le bainistíocht fhónta airgeadais. Léirigh na réamh-mheastacháin tosaigh do Dhréachtbhuiséad 2014 ar na leithreasuithe buiséid i gcomhair íocaíochtaí díreacha agus caiteachas a bhaineann leis an margadh gur ghá méid iomlán na n-íocaíochtaí díreacha is féidir a dheonú d'fheirmeoirí i ndáil leis an mbliain féilire 2013 a laghdú le EUR 1,471.4 milliún trí smacht airgeadais, d'fhonn uasteorainn CERT a urramú don bhliain airgeadais 2014 agus d'fhonn an cúltaca géarchéimeanna a bhunú (EUR 424.5 milliún). Is é 4.981759 % an ráta coigeartaithe smachta airgeadais is gá. Rinneadh an ráta coigeartaithe a ríomh ag cur san áireamh sciar measta na n-íocaíochtaí díreacha atá le deonú d'fheirmeoirí agus atá faoi bhun EUR 5 000 i gcás gach scéime íocaíochta dírí atá faoi réir smachta airgeadais agus i gcás gach Ballstáit, seachas an Bhulgáir, an Rómáin agus an Chróit. Toisc go bhfuil íocaíochtaí díreacha don bhliain airgeadais 2013 faoi réir próisis chéimnithe isteach sa Bhulgáir, sa Rómáin agus sa Chróit, faoi réir a haontachais agus ó dháta a haontachais, ní bheidh feidhm ag an smacht airgeadais maidir leo siúd. Seo a leanas méid measta an laghduithe de bharr smachta airgeadais in aghaidh na míre buiséid: 05 03 01 01 (An Scéim Íocaíochta Aonair) || 1,172.3 m EUR
 05 03 01 02 (An Scéim Íocaíochta Aonair Limistéir) || 160.5 m EUR
 05 03 01 03 (Íocaíocht ar leith do shiúcra) || 9.5 m EUR
 05 03 01 04 (Íocaíocht ar leith do thorthaí agus glasraí) || 0.35 m EUR
 05 03 01 05 (Tacaíocht shonrach Airt. 68–íocaíocht dhíchúpláilte) || 19.9 m EUR
 05 03 01 06 (Íocaíocht ar leith do bhogthorthaí ) || 0.2 m EUR
 05 03 02 06 (Préimh do bha diúil) || 38.7 m EUR
 05 03 02 07 (Préimh bhreise náisiúnta do bha diúil) || 2.4 m EUR
 05 03 02 13 (Préimh do chaoirigh agus do ghabhair) || 0.3 m EUR
 05 03 02 14 (Préimh fhorlíontach do chaoirigh agus do ghabhair) || 0.2 m EUR
 05 03 02 28 (Cúnamh do sheiriceáin) || 0.0 m EUR
 05 03 02 39 (Méid breise do tháirgeadh bhiatais siúcra agus cána siúcra) || 1.1 m EUR
 05 03 02 40 (Cabhair limistéir don chadás) || 11.6 m EUR
 05 03 02 44 (Tacaíocht shonrach, Airt. 68 – íocaíocht chúpláilte) || 39.5 m EUR
 05 03 02 50 (POSEI – Cláir thacaíochta pobail) || 14.5 m EUR
 05 03 02 52 (POSEI – Oileáin Aeigéacha) || 0.3 m EUR
 ||
 Rinneadh
 uasteorainn ghlan CERT don bhliain airgeadais 2014 a ríomh ar bhonn na
 bhfo-uasteorann a socraíodh do chaiteachas a bhaineann leis an margadh agus
 íocaíochtaí díreacha faoi Cheannteideal 2 i gcomhréir le Conclúidí na
 Comhairle Eorpaí (7–8 Feabhra 2013) don bhliain airgeadais 2014, tar éis
 méideanna na n-aistrithe airgeadais idir CERT agus EARD a bhaint de bhun Airteagal 10(b)
 agus Airteagal 136 de Rialachán (CE) Uimh. 73/2009 agus Airteagal 52
 den togra ón gCoimisiún le haghaidh Rialacháin (AE) lena mbunaítear rialacha
 maidir le híocaíochtaí díreacha le feirmeoirí faoi scéimeanna tacaíochta faoi
 chuimsiú chreat an chomhbheartais talmhaíochta.
 Tá
 impleachtaí buiséadacha ag an Rialachán atá beartaithe sa mhéid agus gur
 laghdaíodh réamh-mheastacháin na leathreasuithe buiséid i gcomhair
 íocaíochtaí díreacha (roimh smacht airgeadais a chur san áireamh), gur
 laghdaíodh iad leis na méideanna thuasluaite tar éis an ráta coigeartaithe
 atá beartaithe sa Dréacht-Rialachán seo a chur i bhfeidhm. Mar thoradh air
 sin, áiritheoidh na leithreasuithe a iarradh do Chaibidil 05 03 (cabhracha
 díreacha) don Dréachtbhuiséad 2014, mar atá tugtha i bpointe 1 den
 ráiteas airgeadais seo maidir leis na míreanna buiséid atá faoi réir smachta
 airgeadais, áiritheoidh siad go gcomhlíonfar uasteorainn CERT don bhliain
 airgeadais 2014 agus go mbunófar an méid a theastaíonn don chúltaca
 géarchéimeanna.
 [1] IO L 30, 31.1.2009, lch. 16.
 [2] IO L 204, 31.7.2012, lch. 11.
 [3] IO L 277, 21.10.2005, lch. 1.
 [4] COM (2011) 625, 19.10.2011.
 [5] EUCO 37/13, 8 Feabhra 2013.
 [6] IO C , , lch .
 [7] IO C , , lch .
 [8] IO L 30, 31.1.2009, lch 16.


type: caselaw

jurisdiction: US

text:
The appeal in this case is from a decree of the Circuit Court for Prince George's County dismissing a bill in equity filed by the appellant for an injunction to restrain the appellee corporation from carrying out the provisions of Chapter 122 of the Acts of 1918, creating a suburban sanitary district within the counties of Montgomery and Prince George's, in the State of Maryland, and contiguous to the District of Columbia. *Page 646
 The validity of the Act is assailed upon five stated grounds alleged in the bill, but only two of these were urged in the argument and appear only to be relied upon by the appellant in his brief.
 The defendant answered the bill, and the case was heard upon bill, answer and exhibits, and from a decree of the Court holding the Act to be valid and constitutional, refusing the relief by injunction and dismissing the bill the plaintiff has appealed.
 The appellant is a citizen of the State of Maryland, a resident of the town of Bladensburg, in Prince George's County, and a taxpayer in the suburban sanitary district created by the Act.
 As such taxpayer, he is liable for the assessments and taxation for the general purposes of the Act, and it is no longer an open question in this State that if the statute is invalid and injurious to him he has a clear right, as a taxpayer, to maintain this suit. Baltimore v. Keyser, 72 Md. 106; Painter v.Mattfeldt, 119 Md. 466.
 The title of the Act is:
 "An Act to create a sanitary district within Montgomery and Prince George's Counties contiguous to the District of Columbia; to incorporate the same and to provide for the government thereof; to provide for the construction, maintenance, operation, purchase, or condemnation of water supply, sewerage and refuse disposal systems; to provide for the issuance of bonds for the purpose of such construction; and the levy of taxes, assessments and benefits, water charges and rates for the payment of said bonds; and the operation, maintenance, regulation and control of said systems, and for other purposes."
 The Act contains eighteen sections and covers over seventeen pages of the printed Laws of Maryland of 1918, and incorporates certain sections or parts of the two counties within the bounds and area specifically named therein as *Page 647
 "The Washington Suburban Sanitary District," for the purposes named in the statute.
 The object and purpose of the Act is to bring within the jurisdiction of a commission, acting for these counties within the territory incorporated, an elaborate and complete system of water supply, sewerage and drainage in this district, by which the sections and communities would be served with water from some adopted source and the sewerage carried to some common point for treatment or discharge.
 The sanitary district will cover an area of about ninety square miles of territory, and will practically include all of the territory contiguous to the District of Columbia in the State of Maryland. The present population of this district, including the incorporated towns, is about 40,000 and the assessed valuation of its property about twenty-five millions.
 The legislation adopted and the plan for the creation of the sanitary district and the method, ways and means for the construction and operation of the system proposed were recommended to the Legislature of 1918 in a detailed report by a commission which had been appointed by Chapter 313 of the Acts of 1916 for the purpose of considering the subject.
 The objections raised to the constitutionality of the Act, as stated in the bill, are, (1) that it violates and is in conflict with Section 1, Article 13, in that it creates an administrative and taxing district of parts of two counties, without the consent of the residents of those parts of the county included in the district; (2) that the classification of the property for taxation is arbitrary and unreasonable and without regard to equality and uniformity; (3) that its provisions relating to assessments are unjust and arbitrary, and that the Act fails to provide for a proper hearing or review of the action of the commission as to taxation and assessment; (4) that it discriminates between productive and non-productive agricultural land, and (5) that the Act embraces more than one subject not described in its title, and therefore violates Section 29 of Article 3 of the Constitution. *Page 648
 The first objection, that the Act is in contravention of Section 1, Article 13 of the Constitution, is clearly not tenable. It is obvious that the Act has no relation whatever to Section 1, Article 13 of the Constitution, which has to do with new counties. It does not in any way change the lines of any county, nor interfere with the general jurisdiction of either of the counties mentioned in the Act, but creates a sanitary district or a special taxing district within the lines of two counties for local improvements which are essential to the health and prosperity of the community within its border.
 The exercise of this power by the Legislature has been sustained by the courts of this State and by the Supreme Court of the United States in a number of decisions. Balto. v. State,15 Md. 376; Daly v. Morgan, 69 Md. 460; Revell v.Annapolis, 81 Md. 1; Thrift v. Laird, 125 Md. 55; Welch
 v. Coglan, 126 Md. 15.
 In Hagar v. Reclamation District, 111 U.S. 701, the Supreme Court said the fact that lands may be situate in more than one county can not affect the power of the State to delegate the authority. Such authority may be lodged in any board or tribunal which the Legislature may designate. The expense of such works may be charged against parties specially benefited, and be made a lien upon their property. This is a matter purely of legislative discretion. Whenever a local improvement is authorized, it is for the Legislature to prescribe the way in which the means to meet its costs shall be raised, whether by general taxation or by laying the burden upon the district specially benefited by the expenditure. Orr v. Allen et al., 248 U.S. 35 * * * * * *Mobile v. Kimball, 102 U.S. 691; Orr v. Allen et al., 245 Fed. Rep. 488.
 The second, third and fourth objections of the Act relate to questions of taxation and assessment and the classification of the property, under Section 8 of the Act.
 This section, it will be seen, provides for the classification by the commission of all property within the sanitary district into four classes for the purpose of assessing benefits for the *Page 649
 construction of the water supply and sewerage system, namely, agricultural, small acreage, industrial or business and subdivision property, and to be assessed in accordance with its classification. The commission may change the classification of properties from time to time as the properties change in the uses to which they are put. The Act also provides for written notice and a hearing before the commission as to both classification and assessments of benefits, and the Public Service Commission is given jurisdiction to determine upon appeal the reasonableness of all assessments, tax levies or service charges, as in the case of public service corporations. We find nothing in the provisions of this section that in any way contravenes or is in conflict with the State or Federal constitutions.
 The contention that the provisions of the Act impose an unjust discrimination in favor of agricultural lands when in use for farming and trucking purposes and when not in such use is based upon an improper construction of the Act, and can not be sustained.
 Nor do we find any valid objection to the classification of the property for assessment and taxation as prescribed by the Act. The rates of assessment and taxation will be equal and uniform as to all the property within the taxing district, and this being so it can not be said that its provisions are in conflict with any constitutional requirement. Daly v. Morgan, 69 Md. 460;Leser v. Wagner, 120 Md. 680.
 This brings us to the last and fifth objection to the Act, and that relates to its title. It is contended that the law is invalid because in conflict with Section 29, Article 3 of the Constitution, which provides that every law shall embrace but one subject and that shall be described in its title.
 The title of this Act is very broad and comprehensive and contains a very clear and definite description of the subject-matter of the Act.
 The rule is well settled by a long line of cases in this Court that, while the title must indicate the purpose of the Act, it need not give an abstract of the contents of the Act *Page 650
 or the details thereof, nor need it mention the means and methods by which the general purpose is to be accomplished. Fout v.Frederick County, 105 Md. 545; Co. Commrs. v. Meekins,50 Md. 28; Stevens v. State, 89 Md. 669; Queen Anne's Co. v.Talbot Co., 99 Md. 13; Crouse v. State, 130 Md. 370;Ruehl v. State, 130 Md. 189.
 The title, upon examination, will be seen fully describes the subject-matter of the Act — that is, the sanitary system for the protection of the public health within the district designated. There is nothing in the Act itself that is foreign or not germane and does not relate to what the title indicates.
 The purchase and cancellation of bonds, issued by authority of Chapter 313 of the Acts of 1916, out of the funds derived from any issue of bonds under the Act is a part of the subject-matter covered in the title for the construction of the sanitary system and the issuance of bonds for the development of the same water and sewer systems provided for by the Act.
 As we find no reason for declaring the Act of 1918, Chapter 122, invalid or in conflict with any provision of the State or Federal Constitutions, the decree of the Court below denying the relief sought by injunction and dismissing the plaintiff's bill must be affirmed.
 Decree affirmed, with costs. *Page 651


type: wikipedia

text:
Η τρέχουσα σελίδα αφορά το έτος 1450 κατά το Γρηγοριανό ημερολόγιο
 Γεγονότα
 15 Απριλίου − Μάχη του Φορμινί: Προς το τέλος του Εκατονταετούς Πολέμου, η γαλλική επίθεση σχεδόν εξολοθρεύει τις αγγλικές δυνάμεις, τερματίζοντας την αγγλική κυριαρχία στη βόρεια Γαλλία.
 12 Αυγούστου − Το Σερμπούρ, το τελευταίο μέρος της Νορμανδίας υπό αγγλική κυριαρχία, παραδίδεται στους Γάλλους.
 5 Οκτωβρίου − Οι Εβραίοι εκδιώκονται από την Κάτω Βαυαρία κατόπιν διαταγής του Λουδοβίκου Θ', δούκα της Βαυαρίας.
 3 Νοεμβρίου − Ιδρύεται το Πανεπιστήμιο της Βαρκελώνης.
 23 Νοεμβρίου − Πολιορκία του Κρούγε: Νίκη των Αλβανών. Οθωμανικός στρατός 100.000 ανδρών περίπου αποχωρεί από την Αλβανία.
 Γεννήσεις
 23 Μαΐου - Τζοβάννι Καμπότο, Ιταλός εξερευνητής
 Μαρίνο Μπαρλέτι, Αλβανός συγγραφέας
 Μπεχζάντ - Πέρσης ζωγράφος
 Ιερώνυμος Μπος, Ολλανδός ζωγράφος
 Ζοσκέν ντε Πρε, Φλαμανδός συνθέτης
 Χουάν ντε λα Κόσα, Ισπανός θαλασσοπόρος και χαρτογράφος
 Βαρθολομαίος Ντιάζ, Πορτογάλος εξερευνητής
 Θάνατοι
 13 Μαρτίου − Ελένη Δραγάση, Βυζαντινή αυτοκράτειρα
 19 Ιουλίου − Φραγκίσκος Α', δούκας της Βρετάνης
 Έτη


jurisdiction: EU

text:
 29.8.2012
 HU
 Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja
 L 232/8
 A BIZOTTSÁG 782/2012/EU VÉGREHAJTÁSI RENDELETE
 (2012. augusztus 28.)
 az egyes gyümölcs- és zöldségfélék behozatali árának meghatározására szolgáló behozatali átalányértékek megállapításáról
 AZ EURÓPAI BIZOTTSÁG,
 tekintettel az Európai Unió működéséről szóló szerződésre,
 tekintettel a mezőgazdasági piacok közös szervezésének létrehozásáról, valamint egyes mezőgazdasági termékekre vonatkozó egyedi rendelkezésekről szóló, 2007. október 22-i 1234/2007/EK tanácsi rendeletre (az egységes közös piacszervezésről szóló rendelet) (1),
 tekintettel az 1234/2007/EK tanácsi rendeletnek a gyümölcs- és zöldség-, valamint a feldolgozottgyümölcs- és feldolgozottzöldség-ágazatra alkalmazandó részletes szabályainak a megállapításáról szóló, 2011. június 7-i 543/2011/EU bizottsági végrehajtási rendeletre (2), és különösen annak 136. cikke (1) bekezdésére,
 mivel:
 (1)
 Az Uruguayi Forduló többoldalú kereskedelmi tárgyalásai eredményeinek megfelelően az 543/2011/EU végrehajtási rendelet a XVI. mellékletének A. részében szereplő termékek és időszakok tekintetében meghatározza azokat a szempontokat, amelyek alapján a Bizottság rögzíti a harmadik országokból történő behozatalra vonatkozó átalányértékeket.
 (2)
 Az 543/2011/EU végrehajtási rendelet 136. cikke (1) bekezdése alapján a behozatali átalányérték számítására munkanaponként, változó napi adatok figyelembevételével kerül sor. Ezért helyénvaló előírni, hogy e rendelet az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapjában való kihirdetésének napján lépjen hatályba,
 ELFOGADTA EZT A RENDELETET:
 1. cikk
 Az 543/2011/EU végrehajtási rendelet 136. cikkében említett behozatali átalányértékeket e rendelet melléklete határozza meg.
 2. cikk
 Ez a rendelet az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapjában való kihirdetésének napján lép hatályba.
 Ez a rendelet teljes egészében kötelező és közvetlenül alkalmazandó valamennyi tagállamban.
 Kelt Brüsszelben, 2012. augusztus 28-án.
 a Bizottság részéről, az elnök nevében,
 José Manuel SILVA RODRÍGUEZ
 mezőgazdasági és vidékfejlesztési főigazgató
 (1) HL L 299., 2007.11.16., 1. o.
 (2) HL L 157., 2011.6.15., 1. o.
 MELLÉKLET
 Az egyes gyümölcs- és zöldségfélék behozatali árának meghatározására szolgáló behozatali átalányértékek
 (EUR/100 kg)
 KN-kód
 Országkód (1)
 Behozatali átalányérték
 0702 00 00
 MK
 43,1
 ZZ
 43,1
 0707 00 05
 MK
 44,6
 TR
 91,2
 ZZ
 67,9
 0709 93 10
 TR
 110,2
 ZZ
 110,2
 0805 50 10
 AR
 100,5
 CL
 88,4
 TR
 96,0
 UY
 97,6
 ZA
 109,2
 ZZ
 98,3
 0806 10 10
 BA
 56,0
 CL
 206,9
 EG
 200,5
 TR
 148,7
 XS
 91,2
 ZZ
 140,7
 0808 10 80
 AR
 114,4
 BR
 85,9
 CL
 145,8
 NZ
 109,4
 US
 141,5
 UY
 68,3
 ZA
 100,0
 ZZ
 109,3
 0808 30 90
 CN
 71,7
 TR
 136,1
 ZA
 141,3
 ZZ
 116,4
 0809 30
 TR
 168,1
 ZZ
 168,1
 0809 40 05
 BA
 60,7
 IL
 61,4
 MK
 67,5
 ZZ
 63,2
 (1) Az országoknak az 1833/2006/EK bizottsági rendeletben (HL L 354., 2006.12.14., 19. o.) meghatározott nómenklatúrája szerint. A „ZZ” jelentése „egyéb származás”.


text:
Pavadoņtelefons ir mobilais telefons, kas sakaru nodrošināšanai tieši izmanto sakaru pavadoņus. Pavadoņtelefonus izmanto vietās, kur nav nodrošināts zemes mobilo tālruņu pārklājums.
 Pavadoņtelefonu aparāti ir atkarīgi no pavadoņsistēmas, kuru tie izmanto. Var būt tā saucamie termināļi, kas sastāv no antenas un iekārtu bloka; tie var būt pārvietojami (mobili) vai fiksēti (piemēram, uz kuģa). Mūsdienās plašāk izmanto rokas ierīces. Kopā ar pavadoņtelefonu tajā var būt iebūvētas citas funkcijas, piemēram, GSM telefons, GPS iekārta.
 Skatīt arī
 Pavadoņtelefonu kodu saraksts
 Pavadoņtelefonija


text:
 18.3.2015
 HU
 Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja
 L 74/18
 A BIZOTTSÁG (EU) 2015/446 VÉGREHAJTÁSI RENDELETE
 (2015. március 17.)
 a 37/2010/EU rendeletnek a bárium-szelenát anyag tekintetében történő módosításáról
 (EGT-vonatkozású szöveg)
 AZ EURÓPAI BIZOTTSÁG,
 tekintettel az Európai Unió működéséről szóló szerződésre,
 tekintettel az állati eredetű élelmiszerekben előforduló farmakológiai hatóanyagok maradékanyag-határértékeinek meghatározására irányuló közösségi eljárásokról, a 2377/90/EGK tanácsi rendelet hatályon kívül helyezéséről és a 2001/82/EK európai parlamenti és tanácsi irányelv, valamint a 726/2004/EK európai parlamenti és tanácsi rendelet módosításáról szóló, 2009. május 6-i 470/2009/EK európai parlamenti és tanácsi rendeletre (1) és különösen annak 14. cikkére, összefüggésben 17. cikkével,
 tekintettel az Európai Gyógyszerügynökségnek az állatgyógyászati készítmények bizottsága által megfogalmazott véleményére,
 mivel:
 (1)
 Az élelmiszer-termelő állatoknak szánt állatgyógyászati készítményekben vagy az állattenyésztésben használt biocid termékekben történő uniós felhasználásra szánt farmakológiai hatóanyagok maradékanyag-határértékeit (a továbbiakban: MRL) a 470/2009/EK rendelet alapján kell megállapítani.
 (2)
 A farmakológiai hatóanyagokat és állati eredetű élelmiszerekben előforduló MRL-jeik szerinti osztályozásukat a 37/2010/EU bizottsági rendelet (2) melléklete tartalmazza.
 (3)
 A bárium-szelenát a szarvasmarha- és juhfélék vonatkozásában engedélyezett anyagként már szerepel a 37/2010/EU rendelet mellékletének 1. táblázatában, amelyben a következő státusszal rendelkezik: „Nincs szükség maximális maradékanyag-határértékre”.
 (4)
 A 470/2009/EK rendelet 11. cikkének megfelelően az Európai Gyógyszerügynökséghez a bárium-szelenátról kiadott véleményének felülvizsgálatára irányuló kérelmet nyújtottak be.
 (5)
 Az állatgyógyászati készítmények bizottsága megerősítette eredeti ajánlását, mely szerint a szarvasmarhafélék és a juhfélék vonatkozásában nincs szükség a bárium-szelenát MRL-jének megállapítására. Az állatgyógyászati készítmények bizottsága azonban arra a következtetésre jutott, hogy mivel a szóban forgó anyag és szelén-maradékanyaga kiürülése a befecskendezési helyről rendkívül lassú, fennáll a veszélye, hogy a befecskendezés helyét tartalmazó rész elfogyasztása a megállapított biztonságos szintnél magasabb mértékű szelén-bevitelhez vezethet. Ezért annak biztosítása érdekében, hogy a fogyasztók szelénnek való kitettsége ne haladja meg a biztonságos bevitel felső határát, az állatgyógyászati készítmények bizottsága azt az ajánlást tette, hogy az állatgyógyászati készítményekben használt bárium-szelenát alkalmazása ne befecskendezés útján történjen.
 (6)
 A 470/2009/EK rendelet 5. cikke alapján az Európai Gyógyszerügynökségnek meg kell fontolnia, hogy az egy adott élelmiszerben található farmakológiai hatóanyagra megállapított MRL-ek alkalmazhatók-e ugyanabból a fajból előállított más élelmiszer tekintetében, vagy hogy az egy vagy több fajban található farmakológiai hatóanyagra megállapított MRL-ek alkalmazhatók-e más fajok tekintetében. Az állatgyógyászati készítmények bizottsága javasolta a bárium-szelenát jelenlegi, a szarvasmarha- és juhfélékre vonatkozó „Nincs szükség maximális maradékanyag-határértékre” státusának valamennyi élelmiszer-termelő fajra történő extrapolációját.
 (7)
 A 37/2010/EU rendelet 1. táblázatában a bárium-szelenátra vonatkozó bejegyzést ezért ennek megfelelően módosítani kell.
 (8)
 Az érdekelt felek számára ésszerű időkeretet kell biztosítani az e rendeletnek való megfeleléshez szükséges intézkedések meghozatalára.
 (9)
 Az e rendeletben előírt intézkedések összhangban vannak az Állatgyógyászati Készítmények Állandó Bizottságának véleményével,
 ELFOGADTA EZT A RENDELETET:
 1. cikk
 A 37/2010/EU rendelet melléklete e rendelet mellékletének megfelelően módosul.
 2. cikk
 Ez a rendelet az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapjában való kihirdetését követő huszadik napon lép hatályba.
 Ezt a rendeletet 2015. május 17-től kell alkalmazni.
 Ez a rendelet teljes egészében kötelező és közvetlenül alkalmazandó valamennyi tagállamban.
 Kelt Brüsszelben, 2015. március 17-én.
 a Bizottság részéről
 az elnök
 Jean-Claude JUNCKER
 (1) HL L 152., 2009.6.16., 11. o.
 (2) A Bizottság 2009. december 22-i 37/2010/EU rendelete a farmakológiai hatóanyagokról és az állati eredetű élelmiszerekben előforduló maximális maradékanyag-határértékek szerinti osztályozásukról (HL L 15., 2010.1.20., 1. o.).
 MELLÉKLET
 A 37/2010/EU rendelet mellékletének 1. táblázatában a bárium-szelenát anyagra vonatkozó bejegyzés helyébe a következő szöveg lép:
 Farmakológiai hatóanyag
 Jelző maradékanyag
 Állatfajok
 Maximális maradékanyag-határérték
 Célszövetek
 Egyéb rendelkezések (a 470/2009/EK rendelet 14. cikke (7) bekezdésének megfelelően)
 Terápiás osztályozás
 „Bárium-szelenát
 NEM ALKALMAZHATÓ
 Élelmiszer-előállítás céljából tartott valamennyi faj
 Nincs szükség maximális maradékanyag-határértékre
 NEM ALKALMAZHATÓ
 Befecskendezés útján nem alkalmazható
 Tápcsatorna és anyagcsere/ásványi anyagok”


text:
 AN COIMISIÚN EORPACH
 An Bhruiséil,11.12.2020
 COM(2020) 794 final
 2020/0352(NLE)
 Togra le haghaidh
 CINNEADH ÓN gCOMHAIRLE
 maidir leis an seasamh atá le glacadh thar ceann an Aontais Eorpaigh laistigh den Chomhchoiste a bhunaítear leis an gComhaontú Eitlíochta Eora‐Mheánmhara idir an Comhphobal Eorpach agus a Bhallstáit, de pháirt amháin, agus Ríocht Mharacó, den pháirt eile
 MEABHRÁN MÍNIÚCHÁIN
 1.Ábhar an togra
 Baineann an togra seo le cinneadh lena leagtar síos an seasamh atá le glacadh thar ceann an Aontais sa Chomhchoiste a bhunaítear leis an gComhaontú Eitlíochta Eora-Mheánmhara idir an Comhphobal Eorpach agus a Bhallstáit, de pháirt amháin, agus Ríocht Mharacó, den pháirt eile (‘an Comhaontú’)
 1
 .
 2.Comhthéacs an togra
 2.1.An Comhaontú Eitlíochta Eora-Mheánmhara idir an Comhphobal Eorpach agus a Bhallstáit, de pháirt amháin, agus Ríocht Mharacó, den pháirt eile
 Is é is aidhm don Chomhaontú a bheith i bhfabhar rochtain ar an margadh a oscailt de réir a chéile agus reachtaíocht a chomhchuibhiú ionas go mbeifear níos gaire do reachtaíocht an Aontais, lena n‐áirítear sna réimsí seo a leanas – an tsábháilteacht, an tslándáil, bainistíocht aerthráchta, rialáil eacnamaíoch, cosaint tomhaltóirí agus an comhshaol. Ba cheart na rialacha a bheith bunaithe ar an reachtaíocht ábhartha atá i bhfeidhm laistigh den Aontas Eorpach, mar a leagtar síos in Iarscríbhinn VI a ghabhann leis an gComhaontú seo.
 Tháinig an Comhaontú i bhfeidhm an 19 Márta 2018.
 2.2.An Comhchoiste
 Bunaítear Comhchoiste le hAirteagal 22 den Chomhaontú. Beidh an Comhchoiste freagrach as an gComhaontú a riar agus áiritheoidh sé go gcuirfear chun feidhme go cuí é.
 Chun na críche sin comhoibreoidh sé i raon réimsí agus déanfaidh sé moltaí agus cinntí i gcás ina bhfuil foráil shonrach maidir leis sin sa Chomhaontú. Is iad na príomhchúraimí atá air comhoibriú ar na bealaí seo a leanas: (a) malartuithe ar leibhéal na saineolaithe maidir le tionscnaimh agus forbairtí nua reachtacha nó rialála a chothú, lena n‐áirítear sna réimsí seo a leanas – an tsábháilteacht, an tslándáil, an comhshaol, an bonneagar eitlíochta (lena n‐áirítear sliotáin), agus cosaint an tomhaltóra; (b) scrúdú a dhéanamh go rialta ar éifeachtaí sóisialta an Chomhaontaithe de réir mar a chuirtear chun feidhme é, go háirithe i réimse na fostaíochta, agus freagairtí iomchuí a cheapadh i dtaobh ábhair a chinntear a bheith ina n‐ábhair dhlisteanacha imní; (c) breithniú a dhéanamh maidir le réimsí eile ina bhféadfaí an Comhaontú a fhorbairt a thuilleadh, lena n‐áirítear leasuithe ar an gComhaontú a mholadh.
 Ina theannta sin, i gcomhréir le hAirteagal 5 (Infheistíocht) den Chomhaontú, scrúdóidh an Comhchoiste ceisteanna a bhaineann le hinfheistíochtaí déthaobhacha faoi úinéireacht tromlaigh, nó le hathruithe maidir le rialú éifeachtach aeriompróirí de chuid na bPáirtithe.
 Faoi Airteagal 22(6) den Chomhaontú, glacfaidh an Comhchoiste, le cinneadh, rialacha nós imeachta dó féin.
 2.3.Gníomh beartaithe an Chomhchoiste
 Ag an chéad chruinniú, glacfaidh an Comhchoiste cinneadh maidir le rialacha nós imeachta an Chomhchoiste a ghlacadh (‘an gníomh atá beartaithe’).
 Is é is aidhm don ghníomh atá beartaithe rialacha nós imeachta a ghlacadh, i gcomhréir le hAirteagal 22(6) den Chomhaontú, na rialacha nós imeachta a bheidh mar bhonn d’eagrú agus d’fheidhmiú an Chomhchoiste agus a fhágfaidh go bhféadfar an Comhaontú a chur chun feidhme go cuí.
 3.An seasamh atá le glacadh thar ceann an Aontais
 Ba cheart é a bheith d’aidhm ag an seasamh atá le glacadh thar ceann an Aontais tacú le rialacha nós imeachta an Chomhchoiste a bunaíodh leis an gComhaontú. Ba cheart an seasamh a bhunú ar dhréachtchinneadh an Chomhchoiste atá i gceangal leis an gCinneadh ón gComhairle atá beartaithe.
 4.Bunús dlí
 4.1.Bunús dlí don nós imeachta
 4.1.1.Na prionsabail
 In Airteagal 218(9) den Chonradh ar Fheidhmiú an Aontais Eorpaigh (CFAE) déantar foráil maidir le cinntí lena leagtar síos ‘na seasaimh a ghlacfar thar ceann an Aontais i gcomhlacht arna chur ar bun le comhaontú nuair a iarrtar ar an gcomhlacht sin gníomhartha a ghlacadh a bhfuil éifeachtaí dlíthiúla leo, seachas gníomhartha lena bhforlíonfar nó lena leasófar creat institiúideach an chomhaontaithe.’
 Áirítear ar na ‘gníomhartha a bhfuil éifeachtaí dlíthiúla leo’ gníomhartha a bhfuil éifeachtaí dlíthiúla leo de bhua rialacha an dlí idirnáisiúnta lena rialaítear an comhlacht i gceist. Áirítear orthu freisin ionstraimí nach bhfuil éifeacht cheangailteach leo faoin dlí idirnáisiúnta, ach ‘a bhféadfadh tionchar cinntitheach a bheith acu ar ábhar na reachtaíochta a ghlacfaidh reachtas an Aontais Eorpaigh’,
 4.1.2.Feidhm maidir leis an gcás seo
 Is éard atá sa Chomhchoiste comhlacht arna chur ar bun le comhaontú, arb é atá ann sa chás seo an Comhaontú Eitlíochta Eora‐Mheánmhara idir an Comhphobal Eorpach agus a Bhallstáit, de pháirt amháin, agus Ríocht Mharacó, den pháirt eile.
 Is é atá sa ghníomh a iarrtar ar an gComhchoiste a ghlacadh gníomh a bhfuil éifeachtaí dlíthiúla leis, ós rud é go mbeidh sé ceangailteach ar na Páirtithe faoin dlí idirnáisiúnta.
 Leis an ngníomh atá beartaithe, ní fhorlíontar creat institiúideach an Chomhaontaithe ná ní leasaítear é.
 Dá bhrí sin, is é Airteagal 218(9) CFAE bunús dlí nós imeachta an chinnidh atá beartaithe.
 4.2.Bunús dlí substainteach
 4.2.1.Na prionsabail
 An bunús dlí substainteach maidir le cinneadh faoi Airteagal 218(9) CFAE, braitheann sé go príomha ar chuspóir agus ábhar an ghnímh atá beartaithe agus a bhfuiltear ag glacadh seasamh thar ceann an Aontais ina leith. Má tá dhá aidhm ag an ngníomh atá beartaithe nó má tá dhá chomhpháirt ann agus más féidir ceann de na haidhmeanna nó de na comhpháirteanna sin a shainaithint mar phríomhaidhm nó mar phríomh‐chomhpháirt agus an ceann eile mar aidhm nó comhpháirt theagmhasach, ní mór an cinneadh faoi Airteagal 218(9) CFAE a bhunú ar bhunús dlí substainteach aonair, eadhon an bunús dlí a éilítear de réir na príomhaidhme nó na príomh‐chomhpháirte.
 4.2.2.Feidhm maidir leis an gcás seo
 Is leis an aeriompar a bhaineann príomhchuspóir agus príomhábhar an ghnímh atá beartaithe.
 Dá bhrí sin, is é Airteagal 100(2) CFAE bunús dlí substainteach an chinnidh atá beartaithe.
 4.3.Conclúid
 Ba cheart Airteagal 100(2) CFAE, i gcomhar le hAirteagal 218(9) CFAE, a bheith ina mbunús dlí le haghaidh an chinnidh atá beartaithe.
 5.Foilsiú an ghnímh atá beartaithe
 Ós rud é gur le gníomh ón gComhchoiste a leagfar amach rialacha nós imeachta an Chomhchoiste, is iomchuí an gníomh sin a fhoilsiú in Iris Oifigiúil an Aontais Eorpaigh tar éis a ghlactha.
 2020/0352 (NLE)
 Togra le haghaidh
 CINNEADH ÓN gCOMHAIRLE
 maidir leis an seasamh atá le glacadh thar ceann an Aontais Eorpaigh laistigh den Chomhchoiste a bhunaítear leis an gComhaontú Eitlíochta Eora‐Mheánmhara idir an Comhphobal Eorpach agus a Bhallstáit, de pháirt amháin, agus Ríocht Mharacó, den pháirt eile
 TÁ COMHAIRLE AN AONTAIS EORPAIGH,
 Ag féachaint don Chonradh ar Fheidhmiú an Aontais Eorpaigh, agus go háirithe Airteagal 100(2) de i gcomhar le hAirteagal 218(9) de,
 Ag féachaint don togra ón gCoimisiún Eorpach,
 De bharr an mhéid seo a leanas:
 (1)Thug an tAontas i gcrích an Comhaontú Eitlíochta Eora‐Mheánmhara idir an Comhphobal Eorpach agus a Bhallstáit, de pháirt amháin, agus Ríocht Mharacó, den pháirt eile (‘an Comhaontú’) le Cinneadh (AE) 2018/146
 2
 ón gComhairle agus tháinig sé i bhfeidhm an 19 Márta 2018.
 (2)Le hAirteagal 22 den Chomhaontú bunaítear Comhchoiste chun an Comhaontú a riar agus chun cur chun feidhme cuí an Chomhaontaithe a áirithiú.
 (3)Foráiltear le hAirteagal 22(6) den Chomhaontú go nglacfaidh an Comhchoiste a rialacha nós imeachta.
 (4)Chun cur chun feidhme cuí an Chomhaontaithe a áirithiú, ba cheart rialacha nós imeachta an Chomhchoiste a ghlacadh.
 (5)Is iomchuí an seasamh atá le glacadh thar ceann an Aontais sa Chomhchoiste a leagan síos, ós rud é gur cinneadh a bheidh ina cheangal ar an Aontas a bheidh sa chinneadh ón gComhchoiste lena nglacfaidh sé a rialacha nós imeachta dó féin. Ba cheart seasamh an Aontais laistigh den Chomhchoiste a bhunú ar an Dréachtchinneadh ón gComhchoiste atá i gceangal leis an gCinneadh seo.
 TAR ÉIS AN CINNEADH SEO A GHLACADH:
 Airteagal 1
 An seasamh atá le glacadh thar ceann an Aontais sa chéad chruinniú den Chomhchoiste a cuireadh ar bun le hAirteagal 22 den Chomhaontú Eitlíochta Eora‐Mheánmhara idir an Comhphobal Eorpach agus a Bhallstáit, de pháirt amháin, agus Ríocht Mharacó, den pháirt eile, i ndáil le rialacha nós imeachta an Chomhchoiste a ghlacadh, bunófar an seasamh sin ar an Dréachtchinneadh ón gComhchoiste atá i gceangal leis an gCinneadh seo.
 Féadfaidh ionadaithe an Aontais laistigh den Chomhchoiste mionathruithe ar an Dréachtchinneadh ón gComhchoiste a aontú gan Cinneadh eile ón gComhairle.
 Airteagal 2
 Dírítear an Cinneadh seo chuig an gCoimisiún.
 Arna dhéanamh sa Bhruiséil,
 Thar ceann na Comhairle
 An tUachtarán
 (1)
 Cinneadh (AE) 2018/146 ón gComhairle an 22 Eanáir 2018 maidir leis an gComhaontú Eitlíochta Eora‐Mheánmhara idir an Comhphobal Eorpach agus a Bhallstáit, de pháirt amháin, agus Ríocht Mharacó, den pháirt eile, a thabhairt i gcrích thar ceann an Aontais (IO L 26, 31.1.2018, lch. 4).
 (2)
 Cinneadh (AE) 2018/146 ón gComhairle an 22 Eanáir 2018 maidir leis an gComhaontú Eitlíochta Eora‐Mheánmhara idir an Comhphobal Eorpach agus a Bhallstáit, de pháirt amháin, agus Ríocht Mharacó, den pháirt eile, a thabhairt i gcrích thar ceann an Aontais (IO L 26/4, 31.1.2018, lch. 4).
 ---documentbreak---
 AN COIMISIÚN EORPACH
 An Bhruiséil,11.12.2020
 COM(2020) 794 final
 IARSCRÍBHINN
 a ghabhann leis an
 Togra le haghaidh Cinneadh ón gComhairle
 maidir leis an seasamh atá le glacadh thar ceann an Aontais Eorpaigh laistigh den Chomhchoiste a bhunaítear leis an gComhaontú Eitlíochta Eora‐Mheánmhara idir an Comhphobal Eorpach agus a Bhallstáit, de pháirt amháin, agus Ríocht Mharacó, den pháirt eile
 CINNEADH UIMH 1/ [BLIAIN] Ó CHOMHCOISTE AE-MARACÓ DÁ bhFORÁILTEAR SA CHOMHAONTÚ EITLÍOCHTA EORA-MHEÁNMHARA IDIR AN COMHPHOBAL EORPACH AGUS A BHALLSTÁIT, DE PHÁIRT AMHÁIN, AGUS RÍOCHT MHARACÓ, DEN PHÁIRT EILE
 an ...
 lena nglactar a rialacha nós imeachta
 COMHCHOISTE UM CHOMHAONTÚ AE-MARACÓ,
 Ag féachaint don Chomhaontú Eitlíochta Eora-Mheánmhara idir an Comhphobal Eorpach agus a Bhallstáit, de pháirt amháin, agus Ríocht Mharacó, den pháirt eile, (“an Comhaontú”) go háirithe Airteagal 22, mír 6 de,
 TAR ÉIS CINNEADH MAR A LEANAS:
 Airteagal aonair
 Glactar leis seo rialacha nós imeachta an Chomhchoiste a ghabhann leis an gCinneadh seo.
 Arna dhéanamh [in/i/sa]
 Thar ceann an Chomhchoiste,
 Ceann Thoscaireacht an Aontais Eorpaigh
 [ainm]
 Ceann Thoscaireacht Mharacó
 [ainm]
 Iarscríbhinn
 Rialacha Nós Imeachta an Chomhchoiste
 Airteagal 1: Cinn Toscaireachta
 1. Mar a leagtar síos in Airteagal 22, mír 1 den Chomhaontú, beidh an Comhchoiste comhdhéanta d'ionadaithe ó na Páirtithe Conarthacha.
 2. Beidh Cinn Toscaireachta na bPáirtithe Conarthacha ina gcomhchathaoirligh ar an gComhchoiste.
 Airteagal 2 : Cruinnithe
 1. I gcomhréir le hAirteagal 22, mír 3 den Chomhaontú, tiocfaidh an Comhchoiste le chéile de réir mar is gá agus nuair is gá. Féadfaidh ceachtar de na Páirtithe Conarthacha a iarraidh go dtionólfaí cruinniú.
 2. Féadfaidh an Comhchoiste cruinnithe a reáchtáil aghaidh ar aghaidh nó ar mhodhanna eile (e.g. glaonna comhdhála nó físchomhdhálacha).
 3. Mura gcomhaontóidh na Páirtithe a mhalairt, reáchtálfar na cruinnithe, a mhéid is féidir, ar bhealach a ndéanfar malairt ionaid, gach ré cruinniú, idir áit i mBallstát den Aontas Eorpach agus áit i Ríocht Mharacó.
 4. Is iad an Coimisiún Eorpach, thar ceann an Aontais Eorpaigh agus a Bhallstát, agus an aireacht atá freagrach as eitlíocht shibhialta, thar ceann Ríocht Mharacó, a thionólfaidh na cruinnithe agus déanfaidh siad sin a luaithe a chomhaontóidh na Páirtithe dáta agus ionad na gcruinnithe.
 5. Mura gcomhaontóidh na Páirtithe a mhalairt, ní bheidh cruinnithe an Chomhchoiste ar oscailt don phobal. Más gá, féadfar preaseisiúint a dhréachtú trí chomhaontú frithpháirteach ag deireadh an chruinnithe.
 Airteagal 3 : Toscaireachtaí
 1. Roimh gach cruinniú, cuirfidh na Cinn Toscaireachta a chéile ar an eolas faoi chomhdhéanamh beartaithe a dtoscaireachtaí le haghaidh an chruinnithe.
 2. Féadfar cuireadh a thabhairt d'ionadaithe pháirtithe leasmhara an tionscail aeriompair freastal ar chruinnithe mar bhreathnóirí, má thoilíonn an Comhchoiste leis sin.
 3. Féadfaidh an Comhchoiste a iarraidh ar pháirtithe leasmhara eile nó ar shaineolaithe eile freastal ar a chuid cruinnithe chun faisnéis a sholáthar faoi ábhair ar leith.
 Airteagal 4 : An Rúnaíocht
 Gníomhóidh oifigeach de chuid an Choimisiúin Eorpaigh agus oifigeach de chuid na haireachta atá freagrach as eitlíocht shibhialta Ríocht Mharacó go comhpháirteach mar rúnaithe an Chomhchoiste.
 Airteagal 5 : Clár oibre na gcruinnithe
 1. Leagfaidh na Cinn Toscaireachta amach clár oibre sealadach le haghaidh gach cruinnithe trí chomhaontú frithpháirteach. Tarchuirfidh na rúnaithe an clár oibre sealadach chuig comhaltaí na dtoscaireachtaí cúig lá dhéag roimh dháta an chruinnithe ar a dhéanaí.
 2. Glacfaidh an Comhchoiste an clár oibre i dtús gach cruinnithe. Féadfar ítimí seachas iad siúd atá ar an gclár oibre sealadach a chur leis an gclár oibre, má thoilíonn chomhaontaíonn an Comhchoiste leis sin.
 3. Féadfaidh na Cinn Toscaireachta na tréimhsí a shonraítear i mír 1 den Airteagal seo a ghiorrú chun na ceanglais nó an phráinn a bhaineann le haon chás ar leith a chur san áireamh.
 Airteagal 6 : Miontuairiscí
 1. Tar éis gach cruinnithe den Chomhchoiste, dréachtófar Dréachtmhiontuairiscí ar an gcruinniú. Cuirfear in iúl iontu na hítimí a pléadh, na moltaí ar fad a rinneadh, agus na cinntí a glacadh.
 2. Laistigh de mhí amháin tar éis an chruinnithe, cuirfidh an Ceann Toscaireachta is óstach na Dréachtmhiontuairiscí chuig an gCeann Toscaireachta eile lena bhformheas trí nós imeachta i scríbhinn.
 3. Nuair a bheidh na Miontuairiscí formheasta, síneoidh na Cinn Toscaireachta dhá chóip díobh agus comhdóidh gach Páirtí cóip bhunaidh amháin. Féadfaidh na Cinn Toscaireachta a chinneadh go bhféadfar an ceanglas sin a chomhlíonadh trí chóipeanna leictreonacha a shíniú agus a mhalartú.
 4. Mura n‐iarrfaidh ceann de na Páirtithe a mhalairt, beidh Miontuairiscí chruinnithe an Chomhchoiste ar fáil go poiblí.
 Airteagal 7 : Nós imeachta i scríbhinn
 I gcás inar gá agus inar cuí‐réasúnaithe, féadfar cinntí agus moltaí an Chomhchoiste a ghlacadh trí nós imeachta i scríbhinn. Chun na críche sin, malartóidh na Cinn Toscaireachta na dréachtbhearta ar iarradh tuairim an Chomhchoiste ina leith, agus féadfar an tuairim sin a dheimhniú trí mhalartú comhfhreagrais dá éis sin. Ach féadfaidh aon Pháirtí a iarraidh go dtiocfaidh an Comhchoiste le chéile chun an t‐ábhar a phlé.
 Airteagal 8 : Cinntí agus Moltaí
 1. Is ar bhonn an chomhdhearcaidh a dhéanfaidh an Comhchoiste a mholtaí agus a ghlacfaidh sé a chinntí.
 2. Beidh na teidil ‘Cinneadh’ agus ‘Moladh’ faoi seach ar chinntí agus ar mholtaí an Chomhchoiste, agus beidh sraithuimhir, dáta a nglactha agus tuairisc ar a n‐ábhar ina ndiaidh.
 3. Síneoidh na Cinn Toscaireachta cinntí agus moltaí an Chomhchoiste agus cuirfear i gceangal leis na Miontuairiscí iad.
 4. Na cinntí a ghlacfaidh an Comhchoiste, cuirfidh na Páirtithe Conarthacha chun feidhme iad i gcomhréir lena nósanna imeachta inmheánacha féin.
 5. Na cinntí a ghlacfaidh an Comhchoiste, féadfaidh na Páirtithe Conarthacha iad a fhoilsiú ina bhfoilseacháin oifigiúla féin. Féadfaidh gach Páirtí a chinneadh an bhfoilseoidh sé aon ghníomh eile a ghlacfaidh an Comhchoiste. Déanfaidh gach Páirtí cóip bhunaidh amháin de na cinntí agus de na moltaí a chomhdú.
 Airteagal 9 : Meithleacha
 1. Féadfaidh an Comhchoiste meithleacha a bhunú chun cuidiú leis an gComhchoiste a dhualgais a chur i gcrích. I dtaca leis na téarmaí tagartha le haghaidh meithle, cuirfear iad in Iarscríbhinn a ghabhfaidh leis an gcinneadh lena mbunófar an mheitheal.
 2. Beidh na meithleacha comhdhéanta d'ionadaithe ó na Páirtithe Conarthacha.
 3. Déanfaidh na meithleacha a gcuid oibre faoi údarás an Chomhchoiste, agus tuairisceoidh siad chuig an gComhchoiste tar éis gach ceann dá gcruinnithe. Ní dhéanfaidh siad cinntí ach féadfaidh siad moltaí a chur faoi bhráid an Chomhchoiste.
 4. Féadfaidh an Comhchoiste tráth ar bith cinneadh a dhéanamh deireadh a chur le meithleacha atá ann cheana, a dtéarmaí tagartha a mhodhnú nó meithleacha nua a bhunú chun cabhrú leis a dhualgais a chur i gcrích.
 Airteagal 10 : Teangacha atá le húsáid
 Is iad teangacha oifigiúla na bPáirtithe a bheidh i dteangacha oifigiúla an Chomhchoiste.
 Airteagal 11 : Speansas
 1. Íocfaidh gach Páirtí an speansas a bhaineann lena rannpháirtíocht i gcruinnithe an Chomhchoiste agus i gcruinnithe meithle, i ndáil le speansas a bhaineann lena bhfoireann, le cúrsaí taistil agus cothaithe, agus i ndáil le speansas a bhaineann le postas agus teileachumarsáide.
 2. I dtaca le haon speansas eile a bhainfidh le heagrú ábhartha na gcruinnithe, is é an Páirtí a óstálfaidh na cruinnithe a sheasfaidh iad.
 Airteagal 12: Na Rialacha Nós Imeachta a Leasú
 Féadfaidh an Comhchoiste, tráth ar bith, na Rialacha Nós Imeachta seo a leasú trí chinneadh a dhéanfar i gcomhréir le hAirteagal 22 den Chomhaontú.


type: contracts

text:
 Avis juridique important
 |
 11957A/PRO/N
 TRAITE INSTITUANT LA COMMUNAUTE EUROPEENNE DE L' ENERGIE ATOMIQUE ( C.E.E.A. - EURATOM ), PROTOCOLE RELATIF A L' APPLICATION DU TRAITE INSTITUANT LA COMMUNAUTE EUROPEENNE DE L' ENERGIE ATOMIQUE AUX PARTIES NON EUROPEENNES DU ROYAUME DES PAYS-BAS
 ++++LES HAUTES PARTIES CONTRACTANTES, SOUCIEUSES, AU MOMENT DE SIGNER LE TRAITE INSTITUANT ENTRE ELLES LA COMMUNAUTE EUROPEENNE DE L'ENERGIE ATOMIQUE, DE PRECISER LA PORTEE DES DISPOSITIONS DE L'ARTICLE 198 DU TRAITE A L'EGARD DU ROYAUME DES PAYS-BAS, SONT CONVENUES DES DISPOSITIONS CI-APRES QUI SONT ANNEXEES A CE TRAITE : LE GOUVERNEMENT DU ROYAUME DES PAYS-BAS, EN RAISON DE LA STRUCTURE CONSTITUTIONNELLE DU ROYAUME TELLE QU'ELLE RESULTE DU STATUT DU 29 DECEMBRE 1954, AURA LA FACULTE, PAR DEROGATION A L'ARTICLE 198, DE RATIFIER LE TRAITE SOIT POUR LE ROYAUME DES PAYS-BAS EN SON ENTIER, SOIT POUR LE ROYAUME EN EUROPE ET POUR LA NOUVELLE-GUINEE NEERLANDAISE . AU CAS OU LA RATIFICATION AURAIT ETE LIMITEE AU ROYAUME EN EUROPE ET A LA NOUVELLE-GUINEE NEERLANDAISE, LE GOUVERNEMENT DU ROYAUME DES PAYS-BAS POURRA, A TOUT MOMENT, PAR NOTIFICATION AU GOUVERNEMENT DE LA REPUBLIQUE ITALIENNE DEPOSITAIRE DES INSTRUMENTS DE RATIFICATION, DECLARER CE TRAITE EGALEMENT APPLICABLE, SOIT AU SURINAM, SOIT AUX ANTILLES NEERLANDAISES, SOIT AU SURINAM ET AUX ANTILLES NEERLANDAISES .


text:
Ionizací plynu vzniká ionizovaný plyn. Pro ionizaci se některé molekuly plynu rozštěpí na elektron a kladný iont. Plamen nebo záření jsou ionizátory, které dodávají elektronům energii potřebnou k jejich odtržení. Elektron se může spojit s neutrální molekulou a vytvořit záporný iont.
 Vzduch je vždy alespoň částečně ionizován účinkem kosmického záření a radioaktivity zemské kůry. Běžně vzniká v 1 cm3 vzduchu každou sekundu přibližně 10 kladných iontů a elektronů.
 Elektrické vlastnosti ionizovaného plynu můžeme měřit pomocí ionizační komory. Je zhotovena jako deskový kondenzátor v kovovém krytu s okénkem, kterým do prostoru mezi deskami proniká ionizující záření. Při zvyšování napětí získáváme měřením odporu kondenzátoru voltampérovou charakteristiku výboje.
 Formou ionizovaného plynu je plazma.
 Plyny
 Fyzika plazmatu


text:
 7.6.2022
 GA
 Iris Oifigiúil an Aontais Eorpaigh
 C 222/3
 Ordú na Cúirte (an Séú Dlísheomra) an 3 Márta 2022 – an Bord Réitigh Aonair (BRA) v Portigon AG, an Coimisiún Eorpach
 (Cás C-664/20 P) (1)
 (Achomharc - Airteagal 182 de Rialacha Nós Imeachta na Cúirte Breithiúnais - Aontas Baincéireachta - Sásra Réitigh Aonair (SRA) - Ciste Réitigh Aonair (CRA) - Ríomh na ranníocaíochtaí ex ante don bhliain 2017 - Fíordheimhniú cinnidh ón mBord Réitigh Aonair (BRA) - Dualgas na cúiseanna a lua - Sonraí rúnda)
 (2022/C 222/04)
 Teanga an cháis: an Ghearmáinis
 Páirtithe
 Iarratasóir: an Bord Réitigh Aonair (BRA) (ionadaithe: ar dtús P. A. Messina agus J. Kerlin, i gcáil Gníomhairí, le tacaíocht ó H.-G. Kamann agus P. Gey, Rechtsanwälte, agus ó F. Louis, avocat, agus ina dhiaidh sin K. Jakub, i gcáil Gníomhaire, le tacaíocht ó H.-G. Kamann agus P. Gey, Rechtsanwälte, agus ó F. Louis, avocat)
 Páirthithe eile sna himeachtaí: Portigon AG (ionadaithe: D. Bliesener, F. Geber agus V. Jungkind, Rechtsanwälte), an Coimisiún Eorpach (ionadaithe: D. Triantafyllou, A. Nijenhuis agus A. Steiblytė, i gcáil Gníomhairí)
 An chuid oibríochtúil
 1.
 Cuirtear breithiúnas Chúirt Ghinearálta an Aontais Eorpaigh an 23 Meán Fómhair 2020, Portigon v CRU (T-420/17, nár foilsíodh, EU:T:2020:438), ar neamhní.
 2.
 Cuirtear Cinneadh an Bhoird Réitigh Aonair ina sheisiún feidhmiúcháin an 11 Aibreán 2017 maidir le ríomh na ranníocaíochtaí ex ante don bhliain 2017 leis an gCiste Réitigh Aonair (SRB/ES/SRF/2017/05), a mhéid a bhaineann le Portigon AG, ar neamhní.
 3.
 Coinnítear éifeachtaí chinneadh an Bhoird Réitigh Aonair ina sheisiún feidhmiúcháin an 11 Aibreán 2017, ar ríomh na ranníocaíochtaí ex ante don bhliain 2017 leis an gCiste Réitigh Aonair (SRB/ES/SRF/2017/05), a mhéid a bhaineann le Portigon AG, go dtí go dtiocfaidh cinneadh nua ón mBord Réitigh Aonair i bhfeidhm, laistigh de thréimhse réasúnach ama nach féidir a bheith níos faide ná sé mhí ó dháta seirbheála an ordaithe seo, lena socraítear ranníocaíocht ex ante na bunaíochta seo don bhliain 2017 leis an gCiste Réitigh Aonair.
 4.
 Íocann an Bord Réitigh Aonair, i dteannta a chostais féin a bhaineann leis na himeachtaí céadchéime agus leis an achomharc, costais Portigon AG a bhaineann leis an nós imeachta céadchéime.
 5.
 Íocann Portigon AG a chostais féin a bhaineann leis na himeachtaí achomhairc.
 6.
 Ní gá a thuilleadh rialú a dhéanamh ar iarratas ó Ríocht na Spáinne chun idirghabháil a dhéanamh chun tacú le conclúidí an Bhoird Réitigh Aonair.
 (1) IO C 44 an 08.02.2021


text:
Джоузеф Хан (), наричан още мистър Хан (Mr. Hahn), е американски музикант от корейски произход. Той е диджеят на групата Linkin Park.
 Хан е роден на 15 март 1977 г. в Далас, Тексас, но израства в Глендейл, Калифорния. Влиза в Linkin Park (по времето на „Xero“) благодарение на срещата си с Майк Шинода в колежа по изкуство. Участва много в записването на клиповете на бандата. Повечето клипове са създадени по негова идея. Неговият глас звучи в „Cure for the itch“ от албума „Hybrid Theory“.
 Източници
 Американски диджеи
 Американски музиканти
 Членове на Линкин Парк
 Родени в Далас


text:
 31.5.2005
 IT
 Gazzetta ufficiale dell'Unione europea
 L 137/26
 DECISIONEN. 1/2005 DEL CONSIGLIO DI STABILIZZAZIONE E DI ASSOCIAZIONE UE-CROAZIA
 del 26 aprile 2005
 che adotta il proprio regolamento interno comprese le norme di procedura del comitato di stabilizzazione e associazione
 (2005/404/CE)
 IL CONSIGLIO DI STABILIZZAZIONE E DI ASSOCIAZIONE,
 visto l’accordo di stabilizzazione e di associazione tra le Comunità europee e i loro Stati membri, da una parte, e la Repubblica di Croazia (in seguito denominata «Croazia»), dall’altra, in particolare gli articoli 110 e 111,
 considerando che detto accordo è entrato in vigore il 1o febbraio 2005,
 DECIDE:
 Articolo 1
 Presidenza
 Il consiglio di stabilizzazione e di associazione è presieduto alternativamente, per periodi di dodici mesi, da un rappresentante della presidenza del Consiglio dell’Unione europea, per conto della Comunità e dei suoi Stati membri, e da un rappresentante del governo della Croazia. Il primo periodo ha inizio alla data del primo consiglio di stabilizzazione e di associazione e termina il 31 dicembre 2005.
 Articolo 2
 Riunioni
 Il consiglio di stabilizzazione e di associazione si riunisce a livello ministeriale regolarmente una volta all’anno. D’intesa tra le parti, su richiesta di una di esse possono aver luogo riunioni speciali del consiglio di stabilizzazione e di associazione.
 Salvo decisione contraria delle parti, ogni riunione del consiglio di stabilizzazione e di associazione si svolge nel luogo abituale delle riunioni del Consiglio dell’Unione europea; la data è concordata dalle parti.
 Le riunioni del consiglio di stabilizzazione e di associazione sono convocate congiuntamente dai segretari del consiglio di stabilizzazione e di associazione di concerto con il presidente.
 Articolo 3
 Rappresentanza
 I membri del consiglio di stabilizzazione e di associazione possono farsi rappresentare ad una riunione se impossibilitati a partecipare. Se un membro desidera essere rappresentato, deve comunicare al presidente il nome del suo rappresentante prima della riunione nella quale sarà rappresentato.
 Il rappresentante di un membro del consiglio di stabilizzazione e di associazione esercita tutti i diritti del membro titolare.
 Articolo 4
 Delegazioni
 I membri del consiglio di stabilizzazione e di associazione possono farsi accompagnare da funzionari.
 Prima di ogni riunione il presidente è informato della composizione prevista delle delegazioni delle due parti.
 Un rappresentante della Banca europea per gli investimenti partecipa alle riunioni del consiglio di stabilizzazione e di associazione in veste di osservatore quando l’ordine del giorno contiene punti che riguardano la Banca.
 Il consiglio di stabilizzazione e di associazione può invitare persone esterne a partecipare alle riunioni affinché lo informino su argomenti specifici.
 Articolo 5
 Segretariato
 Le mansioni inerenti al segretariato del consiglio di stabilizzazione e di associazione sono espletate congiuntamente da un funzionario del segretariato generale del Consiglio dell’Unione europea e da un funzionario della Missione della Croazia a Bruxelles.
 Articolo 6
 Corrispondenza
 La corrispondenza destinata al consiglio di stabilizzazione e di associazione viene inviata al suo presidente presso il segretariato generale del Consiglio dell’Unione europea.
 I due segretari provvedono affinché la corrispondenza sia inoltrata al presidente del consiglio di stabilizzazione e di associazione e, se del caso, trasmessa per conoscenza agli altri membri del consiglio. La corrispondenza trasmessa per conoscenza viene inviata al segretariato generale della Commissione, alle Rappresentanze permanenti degli Stati membri e alla Missione della Croazia a Bruxelles.
 Le comunicazioni del presidente del consiglio di stabilizzazione e di associazione sono inviate ai destinatari dai due segretari e, all’occorrenza, trasmesse per conoscenza agli altri membri del consiglio di stabilizzazione e di associazione agli indirizzi specificati nel comma precedente.
 Articolo 7
 Pubblicità
 Salvo decisione contraria, le riunioni del consiglio di stabilizzazione e di associazione non sono pubbliche.
 Articolo 8
 Ordine del giorno delle riunioni
 1. Il presidente stabilisce l’ordine del giorno provvisorio di ciascuna riunione, che viene inviato ai segretari del consiglio di stabilizzazione e di associazione, agli indirizzi di cui all’articolo 6, almeno 15 giorni prima dell’inizio della riunione.
 L’ordine del giorno provvisorio comprende i punti per i quali il presidente ha ricevuto domanda di iscrizione all’ordine del giorno almeno 21 giorni prima dell’inizio della riunione, fermo restando che tali punti saranno iscritti all’ordine del giorno provvisorio soltanto se la relativa documentazione sarà stata trasmessa ai segretari entro la data di spedizione dello stesso ordine del giorno. Il consiglio di stabilizzazione e di associazione adotta l’ordine del giorno all’inizio di ogni riunione.
 L’iscrizione nell’ordine del giorno di un punto che non figuri nell’ordine del giorno provvisorio è acquisita con l’accordo di entrambe le parti.
 2. Il presidente, d’intesa con le due parti, può abbreviare i termini indicati nel paragrafo 1, in funzione delle circostanze di un caso specifico.
 Articolo 9
 Processo verbale
 Il progetto di processo verbale di ogni riunione è redatto dai due segretari.
 Il processo verbale indica, come regola generale, per ogni punto dell’ordine del giorno:
 —
 la documentazione presentata al consiglio di stabilizzazione e di associazione,
 —
 le dichiarazioni che un membro del consiglio di stabilizzazione e di associazione ha chiesto di mettere a verbale,
 —
 le decisioni adottate, le raccomandazioni formulate, le dichiarazioni concordate e le conclusioni approvate.
 Il progetto di processo verbale è presentato al consiglio di stabilizzazione e di associazione per approvazione. Una volta approvato, il processo verbale è firmato dal presidente e dai due segretari. Il processo verbale è conservato nell’archivio del segretariato generale del Consiglio dell’Unione europea, che funge da depositario dei documenti dell’associazione; una copia certificata conforme è inviata a ciascuno dei destinatari di cui all’articolo 6.
 Articolo 10
 Decisioni e raccomandazioni
 1. Le decisioni e le raccomandazioni del consiglio di stabilizzazione e di associazione sono adottate di comune accordo dalle parti. Tra una riunione e l’altra, il consiglio di stabilizzazione e di associazione può adottare decisioni o raccomandazioni mediante procedura scritta, previo consenso di entrambe le parti.
 2. Le decisioni e le raccomandazioni del consiglio di stabilizzazione e di associazione previste dall’articolo 112 dell’accordo di stabilizzazione e di associazione recano rispettivamente il titolo di «decisione» e «raccomandazione», seguito da un numero d’ordine, dalla data di adozione e da un’indicazione dell’oggetto.
 Le decisioni e le raccomandazioni del consiglio di stabilizzazione e di associazione sono firmate dal presidente e autenticate dai due segretari.
 Le decisioni e le raccomandazioni sono inviate a ciascuno dei destinatari elencati nell’articolo 6.
 Ciascuna parte può decidere di far pubblicare le decisioni e le raccomandazioni del consiglio di stabilizzazione e di associazione nella propria Gazzetta ufficiale.
 Articolo 11
 Lingue
 Le lingue ufficiali del consiglio di stabilizzazione e di associazione sono le lingue ufficiali delle due parti.
 Salvo decisione contraria, il consiglio di stabilizzazione e di associazione delibera sulla base di documenti redatti nelle suddette lingue.
 Articolo 12
 Spese
 La Comunità e la Croazia prendono rispettivamente a loro carico le spese sostenute in occasione della partecipazione alle riunioni del consiglio di stabilizzazione e di associazione, per quel che riguarda sia le spese per il personale, di viaggio e di soggiorno sia le spese postali e per le telecomunicazioni.
 Le spese di interpretariato durante le riunioni, nonché di traduzione e di riproduzione dei documenti, sono a carico della Comunità, ad eccezione delle spese di interpretariato o di traduzione da o verso il croato, che sono a carico della Croazia.
 Le spese relative all’organizzazione materiale delle riunioni sono a carico della parte ospitante.
 Articolo 13
 Comitato di stabilizzazione e di associazione
 1. È istituito un comitato di stabilizzazione e di associazione incaricato di assistere il consiglio di stabilizzazione e di associazione nell’esercizio delle sue funzioni. Esso si compone, da un lato, di rappresentanti del Consiglio dell’Unione europea e della Commissione delle Comunità europee e, dall’altro, di rappresentanti del governo della Croazia, di norma alti funzionari.
 2. Il comitato di stabilizzazione e di associazione prepara le riunioni e le deliberazioni del consiglio di stabilizzazione e di associazione, ne applica, se del caso, le decisioni e, in generale, assicura la continuità del rapporto di associazione e il corretto funzionamento dell’accordo di stabilizzazione e di associazione. Esso esamina qualsiasi questione sottopostagli dal consiglio di stabilizzazione e di associazione e qualsiasi problema si presenti nel corso dell’attuazione giornaliera dell’accordo di stabilizzazione e di associazione. Esso sottopone proposte o progetti di decisioni e/o di raccomandazioni al consiglio di stabilizzazione e di associazione per approvazione.
 3. Laddove l’accordo di stabilizzazione e di associazione faccia riferimento all’obbligo o alla possibilità di tenere consultazioni, esse possono svolgersi in sede di comitato di stabilizzazione e di associazione. Le consultazioni possono proseguire in seno al consiglio di stabilizzazione e di associazione, previo accordo tra le parti.
 4. Il regolamento interno del comitato di stabilizzazione e di associazione è allegato alla presente decisione.
 Fatto a Lussemburgo, addì 26 aprile 2005.
 Per il consiglio di stabilizzazione e di associazione
 J. ASSELBORN
 Il presidente
 ALLEGATO
 Regolamento interno del comitato di stabilizzazione e di associazione
 Articolo 1
 Presidenza
 La presidenza del comitato di stabilizzazione e di associazione è esercitata a turno per periodi di dodici mesi da un rappresentante della Commissione delle Comunità europee, a nome della Comunità e dei suoi Stati membri, e da un rappresentante del governo della Repubblica di Croazia. Il primo periodo inizia alla data della prima riunione del consiglio di stabilizzazione e di associazione e termina il 31 dicembre 2005.
 Articolo 2
 Riunioni
 Il comitato di stabilizzazione e di associazione si riunisce quando le circostanze lo richiedono, con l’accordo di entrambe le parti.
 Ogni riunione del comitato di stabilizzazione e di associazione si svolge alla data e nel luogo concordati dalle parti.
 Le riunioni del comitato di stabilizzazione e di associazione sono convocate dal presidente.
 Articolo 3
 Delegazioni
 Prima di ogni riunione, il presidente è informato della prevista composizione delle delegazioni delle due parti.
 Articolo 4
 Segretariato
 Le mansioni inerenti al segretariato del comitato di stabilizzazione e di associazione sono espletate congiuntamente da un funzionario della Commissione europea e da un funzionario del governo della Croazia.
 Tutte le comunicazioni dirette al e provenienti dal presidente del comitato di stabilizzazione e di associazione previste nella presente decisione sono trasmesse ai segretari del comitato e ai segretari del consiglio di stabilizzazione e di associazione.
 Articolo 5
 Pubblicità
 Salvo decisione contraria, le riunioni del comitato di stabilizzazione e di associazione non sono pubbliche.
 Articolo 6
 Ordine del giorno delle riunioni
 1. Il presidente stabilisce l’ordine del giorno provvisorio di ogni riunione, che viene trasmesso dai segretari del comitato di stabilizzazione e di associazione ai destinatari di cui all’articolo 4 almeno 15 giorni prima dell’inizio della riunione.
 L’ordine del giorno provvisorio comprende i punti per i quali il presidente ha ricevuto domanda di iscrizione all’ordine del giorno almeno 21 giorni prima dell’inizio della riunione, fermo restando che tali punti saranno iscritti all’ordine del giorno provvisorio soltanto se la relativa documentazione sarà stata trasmessa ai segretari entro la data di spedizione dello stesso ordine del giorno.
 Il comitato di stabilizzazione e di associazione può invitare esperti alle riunioni affinché lo informino su argomenti specifici.
 Il comitato di stabilizzazione e di associazione adotta l’ordine del giorno all’inizio di ogni riunione. L’iscrizione all’ordine del giorno di un punto che non figuri nell’ordine del giorno provvisorio è acquisita con l’accordo di entrambe le parti.
 2. Il presidente, d’intesa con le due parti, può abbreviare i termini indicati nel paragrafo 1, in funzione delle circostanze di un caso specifico.
 Articolo 7
 Processo verbale
 Di ogni riunione è redatto un processo verbale, basato su un riepilogo, elaborato dal presidente, delle conclusioni del comitato di stabilizzazione e di associazione.
 Una volta approvato dal comitato di stabilizzazione e di associazione, il processo verbale è firmato dal presidente e dai due segretari e ciascuna delle parti ne conserva un esemplare. Una copia del processo verbale è inviata a ciascuno dei destinatari di cui all’articolo 4.
 Articolo 8
 Decisioni e raccomandazioni
 Nei casi specifici in cui il comitato di stabilizzazione e di associazione è abilitato dal consiglio di stabilizzazione e di associazione ad adottare decisioni/raccomandazioni ai sensi dell’articolo 114 dell’accordo di stabilizzazione e di associazione, gli atti recano rispettivamente la denominazione «decisione» e «raccomandazione», seguita da un numero progressivo, dalla data di adozione e da un’indicazione del loro oggetto. Le decisioni e le raccomandazioni sono approvate di comune accordo dalle parti.
 Le decisioni e le raccomandazioni del comitato di stabilizzazione e di associazione sono firmate dal presidente e autenticate dai due segretari e sono inviate a ciascuno dei destinatari elencati nell’articolo 4 del presente allegato.
 Ciascuna parte può decidere di far pubblicare le decisioni e le raccomandazioni del comitato di stabilizzazione e di associazione nella propria Gazzetta ufficiale.
 Articolo 9
 Spese
 La Comunità e la Croazia prendono rispettivamente a loro carico le spese sostenute in occasione della partecipazione alle riunioni del comitato di stabilizzazione e di associazione, per quel che riguarda sia le spese per il personale, di viaggio e di soggiorno sia le spese postali e per le telecomunicazioni.
 Le spese di interpretariato durante le riunioni, nonché di traduzione e di riproduzione dei documenti, sono a carico della Comunità, ad eccezione delle spese di interpretariato o di traduzione da o verso il croato, che sono a carico della Croazia. Le spese relative all’organizzazione materiale delle riunioni sono a carico della parte ospitante.
 Articolo 10
 Sottocomitati e gruppi di lavoro specifici
 Il comitato di stabilizzazione e di associazione può istituire sottocomitati o gruppi speciali operanti sotto l’autorità del comitato, al quale essi riferiscono dopo ciascuna riunione. Il comitato di stabilizzazione e di associazione può decidere di sopprimere i sottocomitati o gruppi esistenti, di definirne o modificarne il mandato o di creare altri sottocomitati o altri gruppi che lo assistano nell’esercizio delle sue funzioni. I sottocomitati e i gruppi non hanno potere decisionale.


type: other

text:
Mitä teet juuri nyt? - Sivu 86
 Sivu 86 / 90 Ensimmäinen ... 36767778798081828384858687888990 Viimeisin
 Tulokset 3 401-3 440/3567
 17.04.2018, 11:37 #3401
 Googletan pupellaa
 17.04.2018, 11:49 #3402
 Oisko perusmuoto pupeltaa? Verbi.
 17.04.2018, 11:50 #3403
 Joo tajusin kyllä. A good one.
 17.04.2018, 15:54 #3404
 Kuuntelen musiikkia Helmiradio -kanavalta.
 18.04.2018, 19:01 #3405
 Olen ornari.
 18.04.2018, 19:03 #3406
 No en mä oikeasti ole. Vähän nyt juksasin teitä. Mahtaa teitä nyt kismittää kun lensitte lankandeerukseen!
 18.04.2018, 19:46 #3407
 Olen uskomaton
 18.04.2018, 19:57 #3408
 Luen "Turva-autot F1:ssä" -ketjun uusimpia käänteitä.
 18.04.2018, 20:03 #3409
 Tsykiatrille aika huomiseksi?
 18.04.2018, 20:14 #3410
 18.04.2018, 20:17 #3411
 Meikäsetäkin mainittu!
 18.04.2018, 20:17 #3412
 Se on hyvä ketju. Olen lukenut sen ainakin kolmesti.
 18.04.2018, 20:37 #3413
 Sinne tulee uutta tekstiäkin aivan jatkuvalla syötöllä!
 21.04.2018, 09:57 #3414
 Odottelen vesisadetta, että vois lykätä renkaanvaihdon huomiseksi.
 21.04.2018, 11:06 #3415
 Tässäpä näitä kevään juttuja, veroilmoitusten täydennystä, peltojen laatutestien palautusta, viljelysuunnittelua ja kokeilusiirtoa Mavin tietokoneelle, että varsinainen palautus on sitten vaan yhden napin takana. Yhden kaverin osalta aamu7:stä. Ihan hyvin meni, kasvinviljelytila.
 Ja hieman uusien ohjeiden opiskelua...
 Maataloustuotannon kirjaamisvaatimuksiin on muutettu seuraavia kohtia vuodelle 2018:
 · Taulukko 1. Lisätty kasvilaji ja siemen- tai taimimäärä –kohtaan viherryttämistuen ekologista
 alaa koskeva kohta. Viherryttämistuen ekologiseksi alaksi ilmoitetusta typensitojakasvin
 seoskasvustosta on kirjattava käytetyt siemenlajit ja niiden osuudet kylvösiemenen painosta.
 · Taulukko 1. Lievennetty nitraattiasetusta koskevan kirjanpidon säilytysaikoja 10 vuodesta
 viiteen vuoteen (ei koske ympäristösitoumukseen sitoutuneita tiloja).
 · Taulukko 4. Lievennetty lanta-analyysin säilytysaikaa 10 vuodesta viiteen vuoteen (ei koske
 ympäristösitoumukseen sitoutuneita tiloja).
 · Taulukko 13. Tarkennettu eläinten lääkitsemiseen liittyviä täydentävien ehtojen kohtia.
 · Taulukko 18. Lievennetty maidontuotantoon liittyviä täydentävien ehtojen kohtia.
 Katso muutokset ja kertaa kirjaamisvaatimukset tarkemmin oppaasta.
 Tuntuu taas, että voi perseen suti. Isäntien vastuullahan nuo kaikkien ohjeiden noudattaminen on, mutta osa ei niitä millään lailla katsele. Melko varmasti jokaisen karjatilan papereissa on jotain pieniä puutteita. Verottajan kanssa pärjää, on oikaisu- ja muutosmahdollisuudet, nämä pitäisi olla heti oikein.
 Viestiä on viimeksi muokannut Vesku; 21.04.2018 11:09.
 21.04.2018, 15:56 #3416
 Kattelen Seinäjoen raveja toimistotuolissa ja mietin pitäisikö päälähtöön jotain panostusta laittaa. Niin ympäripyöreä lähtö, että tuohon kun voittajan keksii niin jonkunlaisen kertoimenkin saisi. 7 T. Rex vähän kiinnostaisi.
 21.04.2018, 16:39 #3417
 Otin viime lähdössä italiantammalla pikkuvoitot, jotka sijoitin tylsästi päälähdön suosikille, Call Me Keeperille. Ei pidä liika ruveta hankaloittamaan tätä totoamista miettimällä liikoja.
 Helppo voitto Call Me Keeperille kuolemanpaikalta, ajamattomana maaliin.
 Viestiä on viimeksi muokannut Lunssila; 21.04.2018 16:57.
 21.04.2018, 17:41 #3418
 Ravitauhka pysyköön omassa otsikossaans.
 21.04.2018, 17:47 #3419
 Luin vain toikin viimeisimmän postauksen, enkä millään meinannut tajuta sanaa ravitauhka. Pakko oli sitten katsoa edellinenkin postaus.
 21.04.2018, 17:48 #3420
 Höpsis! Lisää raviasiaa joka otsikkoon!
 Viestiä on viimeksi muokannut Zoe; 21.04.2018 17:50. Syy: Lisäsin quoten
 21.04.2018, 17:54 #3421
 *Virittelee banjoa soittokuntoon*
 21.04.2018, 18:06 #3422
 Tiijäppä tuota? Itse olen raveja viimeksi pelannut silloin kun V5 oli käytössä. Silloiset työkaverit olivat sitä mieltä, että Vinka voittaa. Ei voittanut. Hävisin monta markkaa.
 21.04.2018, 18:12 #3423
 Mun mielestä pitäs bannia antaa niille, jotka ruualla leikkii.
 21.04.2018, 18:16 #3424
 Pari kyssäriä.
 Miten hyvät ja toimivat on mielestäsi metsän hoitoon liittyvät järjestelmät. Esim. näillä sivuilla https://www.metsaan.fi/
 Kysymyksen esitän, kun tuon puljun avoin data kiinnostaa.
 Mitenköhän normiviljelijät suhtautuvat esim. sirkkojen kasvatukseen? Ala mistä voisi saada lisätuloja. Itsellä on siis kytköksiä myös tähän.
 27.04.2018, 15:25 #3425
 Söin juuri munakkaan ja nyt odotan mahdollisia oireita.
 27.04.2018, 15:39 #3426
 Kävin suihkussa ja otan nyt hiivan (Paulaner Hefe-weissbier dunkel).
 27.04.2018, 18:19 #3427
 Nautin saunaolutta.
 27.04.2018, 18:36 #3428
 Katson uusintana maanantaina päättynyttä Barberin Indycar-kilpailua.
 28.04.2018, 20:29 #3429
 Menen itseeni.
 28.04.2018, 20:29 #3430
 Tulen itsestäni.
 28.04.2018, 21:14 #3431
 05.05.2018, 10:29 #3432
 Vaikka mulla on tuossa kesken yksi akryylimaalaus, aloitin aamulla uuden akvarellin. Jatkan kumpaakin nyt. Molemmat ovat luontoaiheisia, tosin toisen ikäraja K-40.
 05.05.2018, 10:34 #3433
 05.05.2018, 10:35 #3434
 Nk. nude selfie, nykykielellä.
 05.05.2018, 10:37 #3435
 No, tavallaan. Näkymä, johon minusta päin katsottuna tiivistyy elon ihanuus.
 05.05.2018, 10:41 #3436
 Seuraavaksi ehkä tärähtäneitä kunnallisvirkamiesten potretteja.
 05.05.2018, 12:16 #3437
 Kädet pystyyn. On se pakko myöntää, etten osaa maalata ilman mallia.
 05.05.2018, 12:19 #3438
 Tuliskohan Alppu malliksi, vitosella?
 05.05.2018, 12:26 #3439
 Jos Alppu malttaa olla puoli päivää astianpesukoneenasennusasennossa, niin voihan sit kokeilla.
 05.05.2018, 12:29 #3440
 Hattu päässä vai ilman?
 Kaikki ajat GMT +2. Kello on nyt 10:04.


text:
20 . 12 . 97 NL Publicatieblad van de Europese Gemeenschappen C 387/ 11
 later onwettig zou worden verklaard, uitsluitend onder Verzoek van de Rechtbank van koophandel ( tweede
 vermelding van die welke per 1 juli 1990 is toegekend. kamer) te Doornik van 30 oktober 1997 om een prejudi
 ciële beslissing in het geding tussen General Motors
 (') Beschikking betreffende de door de Regione Friuli-Venezia Corporation en Yplon SA
 Giulia ten gunste van de wegvervoerders van die regio toege ( Zaak C-375/97 )
 kende steun .
 ( 2 ) PB L 130 van 15 . 6 . 1970, blz . 1 . ( 97/C 387/ 17 )
 De Rechtbank van koophandel ( tweede kamer) te Doornik
 heeft bij vonnis van 30 oktober 1997, ingekomen ter grif
 fie van het Hof van Justitie op 3 november 1997, in het
 geding tussen General Motors Corporation en Yplon SA,
 Verzoek van het Bayerische Verwaltungsgerichtshof van het Hof van Justitie van de Europese Gemeenschappen ver
 20 oktober 1997 om een prejudiciële beslissing in het zocht om een prejudiciële beslissing over de navolgende
 geding tussen A. Feyrer en Landkreis Rottal-Inn, in aanwe vraag :
 zigheid van de Landesanwaltschaft Bayern, als vertegen
 woordiger van het openbaar belang
 Wat is de precieze betekenis van het begrip „ reputatie van
 ( Zaak C-374/97 ) het merk " in de zin van artikel 13 A, lid 1 , onder c ), van
 ( 97/C 387/ 16 ) de eenvormige Beneluxwet op de merken, dat is ingevoegd
 overeenkomstig het sinds 1 januari 1996 van kracht zijnde
 wijzigingsprotocol, en kan ook worden gezegd, dat deze
 Het Bayerische Verwaltungsgerichtshof heeft bij beschik „ reputatie " voor het gehele Beneluxgebied of voor een
 gedeelte daarvan geldt ?
 king van 20 oktober 1997, ingekomen ter griffie van het
 Hof van Justitie op 3 november 1997, in het geding tussen
 A. Feyrer en Landkreis Rottal-Inn, het Hof van Justitie
 van de Europese Gemeenschappen verzocht om een preju
 diciële beslissing over de navolgende vragen :
 Verzoek van de arrondissementsrechtbank te Amsterdam
 1 . Kan een particulier zich verzetten tegen de heffing van
 hogere retributies dan de forfaitaire bedragen in punt 1 van 30 oktober 1997 om een prejudiciële beslissing in de
 van de bijlage bij artikel 2, lid 1 , van Richtlijn 85/73/ strafzaak tegen Florus Ariël Wijsenbeek
 EEG van de Raad, zoals gewijzigd bij Richtlijn 93/ ( Zaak C-378/97)
 118/EG, wanneer de lidstaat Richtlijn 93/ 118/EG niet
 ( 97/C 387/ 18 )
 binnen de gestelde termijn in nationaal recht heeft
 omgezet ?
 De arrondissementsrechtbank te Rotterdam heeft bij von
 2 . Kan een lidstaat zonder verdere voorwaarden, met een nis van 30 oktober 1997, ingekomen ter griffie van het
 beroep op punt 4, onder b ), van de bijlage bij artikel 2 , Hof van Justitie op 5 november 1997, in de strafzaak
 lid 1 , van Richtlijn 85/73/EEG van de Raad ('), zoals tegen Florus Ariël Wijsenbeek het Hof van Justitie van de
 gewijzigd bij Richtlijn 93/ 118/EG ( 2 ), hogere retribu Europese Gemeenschappen verzocht om een prejudiciële
 ties dan de forfaitaire bedragen heffen, zolang de gehe beslissing over de navolgende vragen :
 ven retributies de werkelijke kosten niet overschrijden ?
 Moeten de artikelen 7A, 2e alinea van het EG-Verdrag,
 3 . Is de op artikel 2, lid 3 , van Richtlijn 85/73/EEG van dat bepaalt dat de interne markt een ruimte zonder bin
 de Raad, zoals gewijzigd bij Richtlijn 93/118/EG, nengrenzen omvat waarin het vrije verkeer van personen is
 gebaseerde bevoegdheid van de lidstaten tot heffing gewaarborgd, en 8A van het EG-Verdrag, dat iedere bur
 van een hoger bedrag dan de communautaire retribu ger van de Unie het recht geeft vrij op het grondgebied
 ties afhankelijk van de in de gehele lidstaat geheven van de lidstaten te reizen en te verblijven, aldus worden
 totale retributie en de in de gehele lidstaat werkelijk uitgelegd dat zij zich verzetten tegen de in een nationale
 gemaakte keuringskosten, of volstaat het, ingeval de regeling van een lidstaat opgenomen strafrechtelijk
 lidstaat de retributieheffingsbevoegdheid aan de bedreigde verplichting tot het tonen van een paspoort bij
 gemeentelijke autoriteiten heeft overgedragen, dat de het binnenkomen van een lidstaat door een persoon, ( al
 door de desbetreffende gemeentelijke autoriteiten gehe dan niet zijnde een burger van de Europese Unie ) wanneer
 ven totale retributie de werkelijke keuringskosten van die persoon deze lidstaat binnenkomt via de nationale
 luchthaven reizend vanuit een andere lidstaat ?
 die autoriteiten niet overschrijdt ?
 (') PB L 32 van 5 . 2 . 1985 , blz . 14 . Verzet enige andere bepaling van het Gemeenschapsrecht
 ( 2 ) PB L 340 van 31 . 12 . 1993 , blz . 15 . zich tegen een dergelijke verplichting ?