type: other

jurisdiction: US

text: b' Department of Health & Human Services\n OFFICE OF\n INSPECTOR GENERAL\n\n\n\nREVIEW OF HIGH-DOLLAR PAYMENTS\nFOR TEXAS MEDICARE PART B CLAIMS\nPROCESSED BY TRAILBLAZER HEALTH\n ENTERPRISES FOR THE PERIOD\n JANUARY 1 THROUGH DECEMBER 31,\n 2006\n\n\n\n\n Daniel R. Levinson\n Inspector General\n\n May 2010\n A-06-08-00070\n\x0c Office of Inspector General\n http://oig.hhs.gov\n\n\n\nThe mission of the Office of Inspector General (OIG), as mandated by Public Law 95-452, as amended, is\nto protect the integrity of the Department of Health & Human Services (HHS) programs, as well as the\nhealth and welfare of beneficiaries served by those programs. This statutory mission is carried out\nthrough a nationwide network of audits, investigations, and inspections conducted by the following\noperating components:\n\nOffice of Audit Services\n\nThe Office of Audit Services (OAS) provides auditing services for HHS, either by conducting audits with\nits own audit resources or by overseeing audit work done by others. Audits examine the performance of\nHHS programs and/or its grantees and contractors in carrying out their respective responsibilities and are\nintended to provide independent assessments of HHS programs and operations. These assessments help\nreduce waste, abuse, and mismanagement and promote economy and efficiency throughout HHS.\n\nOffice of Evaluation and Inspections\nThe Office of Evaluation and Inspections (OEI) conducts national evaluations to provide HHS, Congress,\nand the public with timely, useful, and reliable information on significant issues. These evaluations focus\non preventing fraud, waste, or abuse and promoting economy, efficiency, and effectiveness of\ndepartmental programs. To promote impact, OEI reports also present practical recommendations for\nimproving program operations.\n\nOffice of Investigations\nThe Office of Investigations (OI) conducts criminal, civil, and administrative investigations of fraud and\nmisconduct related to HHS programs, operations, and beneficiaries. With investigators working in all 50\nStates and the District of Columbia, OI utilizes its resources by actively coordinating with the Department\nof Justice and other Federal, State, and local law enforcement authorities. The investigative efforts of OI\noften lead to criminal convictions, administrative sanctions, and/or civil monetary penalties.\n\nOffice of Counsel to the Inspector General\nThe Office of Counsel to the Inspector General (OCIG) provides general legal services to OIG, rendering\nadvice and opinions on HHS programs and operations and providing all legal support for OIG\xe2\x80\x99s internal\noperations. OCIG represents OIG in all civil and administrative fraud and abuse cases involving HHS\nprograms, including False Claims Act, program exclusion, and civil monetary penalty cases. In\nconnection with these cases, OCIG also negotiates and monitors corporate integrity agreements. OCIG\nrenders advisory opinions, issues compliance program guidance, publishes fraud alerts, and provides\nother guidance to the health care industry concerning the anti-kickback statute and other OIG enforcement\nauthorities.\n\x0c Notices\n\n\n THIS REPORT IS AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC\n at http://oig.hhs.gov\n\n Section 8L of the Inspector General Act, 5 U.S.C. App., requires\n that OIG post its publicly available reports on the OIG Web site.\n\nOFFICE OF AUDIT SERVICES FINDINGS AND OPINIONS\n\n The designation of financial or management practices as\n questionable, a recommendation for the disallowance of costs\n incurred or claimed, and any other conclusions and\n recommendations in this report represent the findings and\n opinions of OAS. Authorized officials of the HHS operating\n divisions will make final determination on these matters.\n\x0c DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES Office of Inspector General\n\n Office of Audit Services, Region VI\n 1100 Commerce Street, Room 632\n Dallas, TX 75242\nMay 18, 2010\n\n\n\nReport Number: A-06-08-00070\n\nMs. Melissa Halstead Rhoades\nArea Director & Medicare CFO\nFinancial Management Operations Division\nTrailBlazer Health Enterprises, LLC\n8330 LBJ Freeway, 11.2402\nDallas, TX 75243\n\nDear Ms. Rhoades:\n\nEnclosed is the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Office of Inspector\nGeneral (OIG), final report entitled Review of High-Dollar Payments for Texas Medicare Part B\nClaims Processed by TrailBlazer Health Enterprises for the Period January 1 Through\nDecember 31, 2006. We will forward a copy of this report to the HHS action official noted on\nthe following page for review and any action deemed necessary.\n\nThe HHS action official will make final determination as to actions taken on all matters reported.\nWe request that you respond to this official within 30 days from the date of this letter. Your\nresponse should present any comments or additional information that you believe may have a\nbearing on the final determination.\n\nSection 8L of the Inspector General Act, 5 U.S.C. App., requires that OIG post its publicly\navailable reports on the OIG Web site. Accordingly, this report will be posted at\nhttp://oig.hhs.gov.\n\nIf you have any questions or comments about this report, please do not hesitate to call me at\n(214) 767-8414 or contact Michelle Richards, Audit Manager, at (214) 767-9202 or through\nemail at Michelle.Richards@oig.hhs.gov. Please refer to report number A-06-08-00070 in all\ncorrespondence.\n\n Sincerely,\n\n\n\n /Patricia Wheeler/\n Regional Inspector General\n for Audit Services\n\nEnclosure\n\x0cPage 2 \xe2\x80\x93 Ms. Melissa Halstead Rhoades\n\n\nDirect Reply to HHS Action Official:\n\nNanette Foster Reilly, Consortium Administrator\nConsortium for Financial Management & Fee for Service Operations\nCenters for Medicare & Medicaid Services\n601 East 12th Street, Room 235\nKansas City, Missouri 64106\nrokcmora@cms.hhs.gov\n\x0c EXECUTIVE SUMMARY\n\nBACKGROUND\n\nPursuant to Title XVIII of the Social Security Act, the Medicare program provides health\ninsurance for people age 65 and over and those who are disabled or have permanent kidney\ndisease. Prior to October 1, 2005, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), which\nadministers the program, contracted with carriers to process and pay Medicare Part B claims\nsubmitted by physicians and medical suppliers (providers).\n\nDuring calendar year (CY) 2006, TrailBlazer Health Enterprises (TrailBlazer) was the Medicare\nPart B carrier for providers in several States, including more than 66,000 providers in Texas.\nTrailBlazer processed more than 57 million Texas Medicare Part B claims, 578 of which resulted\nin payments of $10,000 or more (high-dollar payments).\n\nCMS guidance requires providers to bill accurately and to report units of service as the number\nof times that a service or procedure was performed. Carriers used the Medicare Multi-Carrier\nClaims System and CMS\xe2\x80\x99s Common Working File to process and pay Medicare Part B claims.\nThese systems can detect certain improper payments during prepayment validation.\n\nOBJECTIVE\n\nOur objective was to determine whether TrailBlazer\xe2\x80\x99s high-dollar Medicare payments to Part B\nproviders in Texas were appropriate.\n\nSUMMARY OF FINDINGS\n\nOf the 578 high-dollar payments that TrailBlazer made to providers, 497 were appropriate. Of\nthe remaining 81 payments, TrailBlazer incorrectly paid providers for 69 payments totaling\n$429,747 and adjusted 12 payments to less than $10,000 prior to the start of our audit.\n\nTrailBlazer made the incorrect payments because (1) the providers made billing and\ndocumentation errors and (2) TrailBlazer made claim processing errors. In addition, the\nMedicare claim processing systems did not have sufficient edits in place during CY 2006 to\ndetect and prevent payments for these types of erroneous claims.\n\nRECOMMENDATIONS\n\nWe recommend that TrailBlazer:\n\n \xe2\x80\xa2 recover the $429,747 in overpayments identified during our audit and\n\n \xe2\x80\xa2 consider using the results of this audit in its provider education activities.\n\n\n\n\n i\n\x0cTRAILBLAZER HEALTH ENTERPRISES COMMENTS AND OFFICE OF\nINSPECTOR GENERAL RESPONSE\n\nIn its comments on our draft report, TrailBlazer agreed with the findings on all but three claims.\nTrailBlazer stated we had calculated the three claims based on an incorrect modifier.\nTrailBlazer\xe2\x80\x99s comments are included in their entirety as the Appendix.\n\nAfter reviewing TrailBlazer\xe2\x80\x99s explanation regarding the three claims, we concurred and revised\nthe report where appropriate.\n\nTrailBlazer has recovered $381,054 in overpayments, which includes $2,799 in claim interest,\nand is following CMS protocol for collecting the remaining overpayments. TrailBlazer has\nincluded in its provider education activities information related to our findings.\n\n\n\n\n ii\n\x0c TABLE OF CONTENTS\n\n Page\n\nINTRODUCTION......................................................................................................................1\n\n BACKGROUND ...................................................................................................................1\n Medicare Part B Carriers .................................................................................................1\n TrailBlazer Health Enterprises .........................................................................................1\n \xe2\x80\x9cMedically Unlikely\xe2\x80\x9d Edits..............................................................................................1\n\n OBJECTIVE, SCOPE, AND METHODOLOGY .................................................................2\n Objective .........................................................................................................................2\n Scope ................................................................................................................................2\n Methodology ....................................................................................................................2\n\nFINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................................3\n\n MEDICARE REQUIREMENTS ...........................................................................................3\n\n INAPPROPRIATE HIGH-DOLLAR PAYMENTS .............................................................3\n Provider Billing and Documentation Errors ....................................................................3\n Carrier Claim Processing Errors .....................................................................................4\n Carrier Processing Error and Provider Billing Error .......................................................5\n\n CAUSES OF INCORRECT PAYMENTS ............................................................................5\n\n RECOMMENDATIONS .......................................................................................................5\n\n TRAILBLAZER HEALTH ENTERPRISES COMMENTS AND\n OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL RESPONSE ..........................................................6\n\nAPPENDIX\n\n TRAILBLAZER HEALTH ENTERPRISES COMMENTS\n\n\n\n\n iii\n\x0c INTRODUCTION\n\nBACKGROUND\n\nPursuant to Title XVIII of the Social Security Act (the Act), the Medicare program provides\nhealth insurance for people age 65 and over and those who are disabled or have permanent\nkidney disease. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) administers the program.\n\nMedicare Part B Carriers\n\nPrior to October 1, 2005, section 1842(a) of the Act authorized CMS to contract with carriers to\nprocess and pay Medicare Part B claims submitted by physicians and medical suppliers\n(providers). 1 In addition to processing and paying claims, carriers also reviewed provider\nrecords to ensure proper payment and assist in applying safeguards against unnecessary\nutilization of services. To process and pay providers\xe2\x80\x99 claims, carriers used the Medicare Multi-\nCarrier Claims System and CMS\xe2\x80\x99s Common Working File. These systems can detect certain\nimproper payments during prepayment validation.\n\nCMS guidance requires providers to bill accurately and to report units of service as the number\nof times that a service or procedure was performed. During calendar year (CY) 2006, providers\nnationwide submitted more than 800 million claims to carriers. Of these, 10,243 claims resulted\nin payments of $10,000 or more (high-dollar payments). We consider such claims to be at high\nrisk for overpayment.\n\nTrailBlazer Health Enterprises\n\nDuring CY 2006, TrailBlazer Health Enterprises (TrailBlazer) was the Medicare Part B carrier\nfor providers in several States, including more than 66,000 providers in Texas. TrailBlazer\nprocessed more than 57 million Texas Medicare Part B claims, 578 of which resulted in high-\ndollar payments.\n\n\xe2\x80\x9cMedically Unlikely\xe2\x80\x9d Edits\n\nIn January 2007, after our audit period, CMS required carriers to implement units-of-service\nedits referred to as \xe2\x80\x9cmedically unlikely edits.\xe2\x80\x9d These edits are designed to detect and deny\nunlikely Medicare claims on a prepayment basis. According to the Medicare Program Integrity\nManual, Publication 100-08, Transmittal 178, Change Request 5402, medically unlikely edits\ntest claim lines for the same beneficiary, Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System\n(procedure) code, date of service, and billing provider against a specified number of units of\nservice. Carriers must deny the entire claim line when the units of service billed exceed the\nspecified number.\n\n\n1\n The Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003, P.L. No. 108-173, which became\neffective on October 1, 2005, amended certain sections of the Act, including section 1842(a), to require that\nMedicare administrative contractors replace carriers and fiscal intermediaries by October 2011.\n\n\n\n 1\n\x0cOBJECTIVE, SCOPE, AND METHODOLOGY\n\nObjective\n\nOur objective was to determine whether TrailBlazer\xe2\x80\x99s high-dollar Medicare payments to Part B\nproviders in Texas were appropriate.\n\nScope\n\nWe identified 578 high-dollar payments that TrailBlazer processed during CY 2006. TrailBlazer\nadjusted 12 of the payments to less than $10,000 prior to the start of our audit. We reviewed the\nremaining 566 high-dollar payments, which totaled $11,497,879.\n\nWe limited our review of TrailBlazer\xe2\x80\x99s internal controls to those applicable to the 566 high-\ndollar claims because our objective did not require an understanding of all internal controls over\nthe submission and processing of claims. Our review allowed us to establish reasonable\nassurance of the authenticity and accuracy of the data obtained from the National Claims History\nfile, but we did not assess the completeness of the file.\n\nWe performed our audit work from November 2008 to September 2009.\n\nMethodology\n\nTo accomplish our objective, we:\n\n \xe2\x80\xa2 reviewed applicable Medicare laws, regulations, and guidance;\n\n \xe2\x80\xa2 used CMS\xe2\x80\x99s National Claims History file to identify Medicare Part B claims with high-\n dollar payments;\n\n \xe2\x80\xa2 reviewed Medicare Multi-Carrier Claims System claim histories for claims with high-\n dollar payments to determine whether the claims had been canceled and superseded by\n revised claims or whether payments remained outstanding at the start of our audit;\n\n \xe2\x80\xa2 contacted providers to determine whether high-dollar claims were billed correctly and, if\n not, why the claims were billed incorrectly; and\n\n \xe2\x80\xa2 coordinated our claim review with TrailBlazer, including the calculation of any payment\n errors.\n\nWe conducted this performance audit in accordance with generally accepted government\nauditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain\nsufficient, appropriate evidence to provide a reasonable basis for our findings and conclusions\nbased on our audit objectives. We believe that the evidence obtained provides a reasonable basis\nfor our findings and conclusions based on our audit objective.\n\n\n\n 2\n\x0c FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS\n\nOf the 578 high-dollar payments that TrailBlazer made to providers, 497 were appropriate Of\nthe remaining 81 payments, TrailBlazer incorrectly paid providers for 69 payments totaling\n$429,747 and adjusted 12 payments to less than $10,000 prior to the start of our audit.\n\nTrailBlazer made the incorrect payments because (1) the providers made billing and\ndocumentation errors and (2) TrailBlazer made claim processing errors. In addition, the\nMedicare claim processing systems did not have sufficient edits in place during CY 2006 to\ndetect and prevent payments for these types of erroneous claims.\n\nMEDICARE REQUIREMENTS\n\nThe CMS Carriers Manual, Publication 14, part 2, section 5261.1, requires that carriers\naccurately process claims in accordance with Medicare laws, regulations, and instructions.\nSection 5261.3 of the manual requires carriers to effectively and continually analyze \xe2\x80\x9cdata that\nidentifies aberrancies, emerging trends and areas of potential abuse, overutilization or\ninappropriate care, and \xe2\x80\xa6 areas where the trust fund is most at risk, i.e., highest volume and/or\nhighest dollar codes.\xe2\x80\x9d\n\nINAPPROPRIATE HIGH-DOLLAR PAYMENTS\n\nTrailBlazer made 69 incorrect payments. For 40 claims, providers made billing and\ndocumentation errors. For 28 claims, TrailBlazer made claim processing errors. On the\nremaining claim, both TrailBlazer and the provider made an error. As a result, TrailBlazer\noverpaid the providers $429,747.\n\nProvider Billing and Documentation Errors\n\nFor 40 claims, providers made billing errors or were unable to provide supporting\ndocumentation. As a result, TrailBlazer overpaid the providers $382,823.\n\n \xe2\x80\xa2 For 25 claims, providers billed for incorrect units of service for cancer drugs. Providers\n made the following additional errors on four of these claims. For two claims, providers\n coded the claims using incorrect procedure codes for the drugs provided. For one claim,\n the provider also billed incorrect units of service for the procedure code for initiating the\n chemotherapy infusion. For the remaining claim, a provider did not provide supporting\n documentation for the other line items on the claim. As a result, TrailBlazer overpaid the\n providers $266,633.\n\n \xe2\x80\xa2 For four claims, providers billed for incorrect units of service for injectable drugs. For\n two of these claims, providers also coded the claims using incorrect procedure codes for\n the drugs provided. As a result, TrailBlazer overpaid the providers $66,875.\n\n\n\n\n 3\n\x0c \xe2\x80\xa2 For two claims, a provider billed incorrect units of service for performing a test that\n measures and records the electrical activity in an individual\xe2\x80\x99s brain. As a result,\n TrailBlazer overpaid the provider $31,404.\n\n \xe2\x80\xa2 For three claims, providers coded the claims using an incorrect procedure code for\n implantable neurostimulator pulse generators. For one of these claims, the provider also\n billed for a recharging system that was not compatible with the nonrechargeable pulse\n generator that was implanted. As a result, TrailBlazer overpaid the providers $11,255.\n\n \xe2\x80\xa2 For three claims, a provider billed for incorrect units of service for hemophilia drugs. As\n a result, TrailBlazer overpaid the provider $4,729.\n\n \xe2\x80\xa2 For one claim, a provider was unable to provide supporting records. As a result,\n TrailBlazer overpaid the provider $3,404.\n\n \xe2\x80\xa2 For one claim, a provider made multiple billing errors. The provider billed for a\n procedure that was not performed, billed an incorrect procedure code for an implantable\n neurostimulator pulse generator, and billed for incorrect units of the patient programmer\n for the pulse generator. As a result, TrailBlazer underpaid the provider $1,615.\n\n \xe2\x80\xa2 For one claim, the provider billed for incorrect units of service for neurostimulator\n electrodes. As a result, TrailBlazer overpaid the provider $138.\n\nCarrier Claim Processing Errors\n\nFor 28 claims, TrailBlazer made claim processing errors. As a result, TrailBlazer overpaid the\nproviders $46,738.\n\n \xe2\x80\xa2 For 26 claims, TrailBlazer made the following processing errors on claims for hemophilia\n blood clotting factors. 2 For 21 of these claims, TrailBlazer incorrectly paid\n nonparticipating providers the participating rate. 3 For six claims, TrailBlazer did not pay\n the rate applicable to the quarter for the dates of service of the claims. For one claim,\n TrailBlazer paid the claim using an incorrect number of units of service. As a result,\n TrailBlazer overpaid the providers $36,574.\n\n \xe2\x80\xa2 For one claim, the provider reported that it had billed for incorrect units on a claim.\n TrailBlazer stated that it had paid the correct units in March 2007 but had not recovered\n the original erroneous payment. As a result, TrailBlazer overpaid the provider $10,197.\n\n\n\n\n2\n Two claims had multiple errors.\n3\n Providers that choose not to participate in the Medicare program receive 95 percent of the allowable amount paid\nto participating providers.\n\n\n 4\n\x0c \xe2\x80\xa2 For one claim, TrailBlazer did not properly apply multiple-surgery special-payment\n rules 4 and also paid an incorrect rate for a procedure code for supervising needle\n placement using a computer imaging technique. As a result, TrailBlazer underpaid the\n provider $33.\n\nCarrier Processing Error and Provider Billing Error\n\nFor one claim, TrailBlazer used an incorrect payment rate for a procedure code for implanting a\nneurostimulator pulse generator. In addition, the provider billed for implanting a neurostimulator\nelectrode even though the procedure was not performed. As a result, TrailBlazer overpaid the\nprovider $186.\n\nCAUSES OF INCORRECT PAYMENTS\nThe providers that gave a reason attributed the incorrect claims to human error. TrailBlazer also\nattributed its claim processing errors to human error because most of the claims were processed\nmanually. In addition, during CY 2006, the Medicare Multi-Carrier Claims System and the\nCMS Common Working File did not have sufficient prepayment controls to detect and prevent\ninappropriate payments resulting from claims for incorrect units of service. Instead, CMS relied\non providers to notify carriers of incorrect payments and on beneficiaries to review their\nMedicare Summary Notice and disclose any provider errors. 5\n\nRECOMMENDATIONS\n\nWe recommend that TrailBlazer:\n\n \xe2\x80\xa2 recover the $429,747 in overpayments identified during our audit and\n\n \xe2\x80\xa2 consider using the results of this audit in its provider education activities.\n\n\n\n\n4\n When certain surgical procedure codes under the Physician Fee schedule are billed, the code with the highest\nallowable rate should be paid 100 percent of the allowable rate; subsequent codes should be paid at 50 percent of the\nallowable rate.\n5\n The carrier sends a Medicare Summary Notice to the beneficiary after the provider files a claim for Part B\nservice(s). The notice explains the service(s) billed, the approved amount, the Medicare payment, and the amount\ndue from the beneficiary.\n\n\n\n 5\n\x0cTRAILBLAZER HEALTH ENTERPRISES COMMENTS AND OFFICE OF\nINSPECTOR GENERAL RESPONSE\n\nIn its comments on our draft report, TrailBlazer agreed with the findings on all but three claims.\nTrailBlazer stated we had calculated the three claims based on an incorrect modifier.\nTrailBlazer\xe2\x80\x99s comments are included in their entirety as the Appendix.\n\nAfter reviewing TrailBlazer\xe2\x80\x99s explanation regarding the three claims, we concurred and revised\nthe report where appropriate.\n\nTrailBlazer has recovered $381,054 in overpayments, which includes $2,799 in claim interest,\nand is following CMS protocol for collecting the remaining overpayments. TrailBlazer has\nincluded in its provider education activities information related to our findings\n\n\n\n\n 6\n\x0cAPPENDIX\n\x0c APPENDIX\n Page 1 of 2\n MEDICARE\n\n\n\nApril 5, 2010\n\n\nPatricia Wheeler\nRegional Inspector General for Audit Services\nOffice of Inspector General\n1100 Commerce, Room 632\nDallas, Texas 75242\n\nReport Number: A-06-08-00070\n\nDear Ms. Wheeler:\n\nWe received the February 26, 2010, draft report entitled \xe2\x80\x9cReview of High-Dollar Payments for\nTexas Medicare Part B Claims Processed by TrailBlazer Health Enterprises for the Period\nJanuary 1 through December 31, 2006.\xe2\x80\x9d In the draft report, the OIG recommended that\nTrailBlazer:\n \xef\x82\xa7 Recover the $438,560 in overpayments identified during the audit; and\n \xef\x82\xa7 Consider using the results of this audit in provider education activities.\n\nPlease consider the following responses to these recommendations for inclusion in the final\nreport:\n\n Recovery of Overpayments: As a result of this audit, TrailBlazer demanded $429,778,\n which is net of $5,004 underpayment adjustments made as determined by the OIG audit. As\n of March 31, 2010, TrailBlazer has collected $381,054, which includes $2,799 of interest.\n TrailBlazer is following CMS protocol for debt collection and referral for the remaining\n demanded debt totaling $48,724.\n\n Upon examination of the OIG findings, TrailBlazer determined the overpayment amount for\n three claims, totaling $8,813, was improperly determined. The OIG calculation of the\n overpayment is based on the use of the 51 modifier which calculates the multiple surgery\n logic. The claim detail lines for these claims used the 78 modifier which is excluded from\n the multiple surgery pricing logic. Additionally, we determined that these three claims paid\n properly based on the intraop. portion of HCPCS code 36870.\n\n The remaining difference totaling <$31> represents immaterial differences in the\n overpayment calculation. The detail spreadsheet with our comments is attached to this letter.\n\n\n\n\n TrailBlazer Health Enterprises, LLC\n Executive Center III \xe2\x80\xa2 8330 LBJ Freeway \xe2\x80\xa2 Dallas, TX 75243-1213\n CERTIFIED\n A Medicare Administrative Contractor\n\x0c APPENDIX\n Page 2 of 2\n\n\n Provider Education Activities: To provide guidance on issues relating to Part B drugs and\n biologicals, the TrailBlazer Web site contains specialty Web pages dedicated to these\n services. The TrailBlazer Provider Outreach and Education staff developed an online job aid\n to assist in the proper coding and quantity billing. This job aid is located at the following\n address:\n http://www.trailblazerhealth.com/Publications/Job%20Aid/DrugsandBiologicalsCodingTips.\n pdf\n\n In addition, the TrailBlazer Web site offers a special \xe2\x80\x9cDocumentation Tips Page\xe2\x80\x9d, which\n includes tips for medical record documentation for Drugs and Biologicals. This Web page is\n located at the following address:\n http://www.trailblazerhealth.com/CERT/Medical%20Record%20Submission/Documentation\n Tips.aspx#Drugs%20and%20Biologicals\n\n TrailBlazer established Local Coverage Determinations (LCDs) for Drugs and Biologicals,\n Non-Chemotherapeutic and Drugs and Biologicals, Chemotherapeutic. These LCDs explain\n the coverage criteria for selected drugs and biologicals. TrailBlazer also established an LCD\n on Spinal Cord Stimulation (Dorsal Column Stimulation), which provides policy and coding\n guidelines associated with implantable neurostimulator pulse generators and related services.\n LCD information is available on the TrailBlazer Web site:\n http://www.trailblazerhealth.com/Tools/LCDs.aspx?DomainID=1\n\n TrailBlazer offered Chemotherapy Administration Web-based training on March 24, 2010.\n This training session focused on Medicare Part B chemotherapy policy and billing including\n hydration, therapeutic, prophylactic and diagnostic injections and infusions. This session\n included:\n \xef\x82\xa7 Billing guidelines.\n \xef\x82\xa7 Proper documentation.\n \xef\x82\xa7 Top billing errors/rejections associated with billing these services.\n \xef\x82\xa7 Comprehensive Error Rate Testing (CERT) findings.\n \xef\x82\xa7 Resources.\n\nIf you have any questions regarding our response, please contact me.\n\nSincerely,\n\n/s/ Melissa H. Rhoades\n\nMelissa Halstead Rhoades\nArea Director & Medicare CFO\n\ncc: Virginia Adams, CMS Project Officer for A/B MAC Southern Program Division\n Gil R. Glover, President & Chief Operating Officer\n Scott J. Manning, Vice President, Financial Mgt. Operations & J4 MAC Project Manager\n Kevin Bidwell, Vice President & Compliance Officer\n\x0c'


type: legislation

jurisdiction: EU

text:
 EIROPAS KOMISIJA
 Briselē, 7.12.2018
 COM(2018) 799 final
 2018/0410(NLE)
 Priekšlikums
 PADOMES LĒMUMS
 par to, lai Savienības vārdā parakstītu statusa nolīgumu starp Eiropas Savienību un Serbijas Republiku par darbībām, ko Serbijas Republikā veic Eiropas Robežu un krasta apsardzes aģentūra
 PASKAIDROJUMA RAKSTS
 1.PRIEKŠLIKUMA KONTEKSTS
 •Priekšlikuma pamatojums un mērķi
 Saskaņā ar 54. panta 3. punktu Eiropas Parlamenta un Padomes 2016. gada 14. septembra Regulā (ES) 2016/1624 par Eiropas Robežu un krasta apsardzi
 1
 , Eiropas Robežu un krasta apsardzes aģentūra var koordinēt operatīvo sadarbību starp dalībvalstīm un trešām valstīm ārējo robežu pārvaldības jomā. Šajā sakarībā tā var veikt darbības pie ārējām robežām, iesaistot vienu vai vairākas dalībvalstis un kādu trešo valsti, kas ir kaimiņvalsts vismaz vienai no minētajām dalībvalstīm, pēc vienošanās ar minēto kaimiņvalsti, tostarp minētās trešās valsts teritorijā.
 Saskaņā ar Regulas (ES) 2016/1624 54. panta 4. punktu gadījumos, kad ir paredzēts, ka Eiropas Robežu un krasta apsardzes vienības tiks izvietotas trešā valstī darbībās, kurās vienību dalībniekiem būs īstenošanas pilnvaras vai ja citas darbības trešās valstīs to pieprasa, Savienība ar attiecīgo trešo valsti noslēdz statusa nolīgumu. Statusa nolīgums ietver visus aspektus, kas vajadzīgi, lai veiktu minētās darbības. Tajā jo īpaši nosaka operācijas apmēru un vienību dalībnieku civiltiesisko atbildību un kriminālatbildību, uzdevumus un pilnvaras. Ar statusa nolīgumu nodrošina, ka šo operāciju laikā tiek pilnībā ievērotas pamattiesības.
 Pamatojoties uz Padomes pieņemtajām sarunu norādēm, Eiropas Komisija ar Serbijas Republiku ir risinājusi sarunas par nolīgumu par darbībām, ko Eiropas Robežu un krasta apsardzes aģentūra veic Serbijas Republikā (“statusa nolīgumu”), lai izveidotu tiesisko regulējumu, kas, izstrādājot operatīvos plānus, ļautu nekavējoties rīkoties, ja būs vajadzīga ātra reakcija. Lai gan migrācijas plūsmas šajā reģionā ir daudz mazākas nekā 2015. un 2016. gadā, organizētās noziedzības tīkli ātri pielāgo jauniem apstākļiem gan savus neatbilstīgu migrantu tirdzniecības maršrutus, gan arī metodes. Noslēdzot šādu statusa nolīgumu, Serbijas Republikas atbildīgās iestādes un ES dalībvalstis, ko koordinē Eiropas Robežu un krasta apsardzes aģentūra, daudz labāk spēs ātri reaģēt uz šādām iespējamām norisēm.
 Pievienotais priekšlikums Padomes lēmumam ir juridisks instruments, kas vajadzīgs, lai parakstītu statusa nolīgumu starp Eiropas Savienību un Serbijas Republiku.
 Komisija 2017. gada 21. februārī saņēma Padomes atļauju sākt sarunas ar Serbijas Republiku par statusa nolīgumu par darbībām, ko Serbijas Republikā veic Eiropas Robežu un krasta apsardzes aģentūra.
 Sarunas par statusa nolīgumu tika sāktas 2017. gada 7. aprīlī, un to otrā kārta notika 2017. gada 11. maijā. Visbeidzot, vienošanās tika panākta 2018. gada 3. augustā. Statusa nolīgumu 2018. gada 20. septembrī Belgradā parafēja migrācijas, iekšlietu un pilsonības komisārs D. Avramopuls un Serbijas Republikas iekšlietu ministrs N. Stefanovičs.
 Komisija uzskata, ka Padomes sarunu norādēs izvirzītie mērķi ir sasniegti un statusa nolīguma projekts ir Savienībai pieņemams.
 Dalībvalstis informēja un ar tām apspriedās attiecīgajās Padomes darba grupās.
 •Saskaņotība ar pašreizējiem noteikumiem konkrētajā politikas jomā
 Pašlaik sešpadsmit dalībvalstīm ir spēkā divpusēji nolīgumi ar Serbijas Republiku. Tie ietver virkni tādu kopīgu pasākumu kā robežpārbaudes, novērošanu, patrulēšanu atgriešanu utt. Starp Serbijas Republikas Iekšlietu ministriju un Eiropas Robežu un krasta apsardzes aģentūru jau ir izveidots darba režīms, kurā jo īpaši ir ietverta Serbijas robežpolicijas pārstāvju regulāra dalība Eiropas Robežu un krasta apsardzes aģentūras koordinētās kopīgās operācijās novērotāju statusā dalībvalstu teritorijā pēc vienošanās ar uzņēmēju dalībvalsti.
 •Saskaņotība ar citām Savienības politikas jomām
 Eiropas programma migrācijas jomā
 2
 balstās uz četriem pīlāriem. Viens no tiem ir robežu pārvaldība. Tas nozīmē, ka tiks labāk pārvaldītas ES ārējās robežas, jo īpaši solidarizējoties ar tām dalībvalstīm, kuras atrodas pie ārējām robežām, un tiks uzlabota robežšķērsošanas efektivitāte. Pastiprināta Serbijas Republikas robežkontrole pozitīvi ietekmēs arī ES ārējās robežas, jo īpaši Bulgārijas, Horvātijas, Ungārijas un Rumānijas ārējās robežas, kā arī Serbijas Republikas robežas. Turpmāka drošības nostiprināšana pie ārējām robežām ir arī saskaņā ar Eiropas Drošības programmu
 3
 .
 2.JURIDISKAIS PAMATS, SUBSIDIARITĀTE UN PROPORCIONALITĀTE
 •Juridiskais pamats
 Šā priekšlikuma Padomes lēmumam juridiskais pamats ir LESD 77. panta 2. punkta b) un d) apakšpunkts un 79. panta 2. punkta c) apakšpunkts saistībā ar LESD 218. panta 5. punktu.
 Tas, kas ES noslēdz statusa nolīgumu, ir skaidri paredzēts Regulas (ES) 2016/1624 54. panta 4. punktā, kurā noteikts, ka gadījumos, kad ir paredzēts, ka vienības tiks izvietotas trešā valstī darbībās, kurās vienību dalībniekiem būs īstenošanas pilnvaras vai ja citas darbības trešās valstīs to pieprasa, Savienība ar attiecīgo trešo valsti noslēdz statusa nolīgumu.
 Saskaņā ar LESD 3. panta 2. punktu Savienības ekskluzīvā kompetencē ir noslēgt starptautisku nolīgumu, ja tā slēgšana ir paredzēta Savienības leģislatīvajā aktā. Regulas (ES) 2016/1624 54. panta 4. punkts paredz šāda statusa nolīguma slēgšanu starp Eiropas Savienību un attiecīgo trešo valsti. Tāpēc pievienotais nolīgums ar Serbijas Republiku ietilpst Eiropas Savienības ekskluzīvā kompetencē.
 •Subsidiaritāte (neekskluzīvas kompetences gadījumā
 Neattiecas.
 •Proporcionalitāte
 Ņemot vērā to, ka organizētās noziedzības tīkli ātri pielāgo savus maršrutus un metodes neatbilstīgu migrantu tirdzniecībā, ir nepieciešama ES iesaistīšanās, lai uzlabotu kontroli pie Serbijas Republikas robežām. Statusa nolīguma noslēgšana ir nepieciešama, lai Serbijas Republikas atbildīgās iestādes un ES dalībvalstis, ko koordinē Eiropas Robežu un krasta apsardzes aģentūra, varētu ātri reaģēt uz šādām iespējamām norisēm. Tas pēkšņa neatbilstīgu migrantu pieplūduma gadījumā ļaus Eiropas Robežu un krasta apsardzes aģentūrai izvietot Serbijas Republikā Eiropas Robežu un krasta apsardzes vienības.
 •Juridiskā instrumenta izvēle
 Šis priekšlikums ir saskaņā ar LESD 218. panta 5. punktu, kurā paredzēts, ka Padome pieņem lēmumus par starptautiskiem nolīgumiem. Nav cita juridiska instrumenta, ko varētu izmantot šā priekšlikuma mērķa sasniegšanai.
 3.EX POST IZVĒRTĒJUMU, APSPRIEŠANĀS AR IEINTERESĒTAJĀM PERSONĀM UN IETEKMES NOVĒRTĒJUMU REZULTĀTI
 •Ex post izvērtējumi / spēkā esošo tiesību aktu atbilstības pārbaudes
 Neattiecas.
 •Apspriešanās ar ieinteresētajām personām
 Neattiecas.
 •Ekspertu atzinumu pieprasīšana un izmantošana
 Neattiecas.
 •Ietekmes novērtējums
 Sarunām par statusa nolīgumu ietekmes novērtējums nav bijis nepieciešams.
 •Normatīvā atbilstība un vienkāršošana
 Tā kā šis būs jauns nolīgums, nav iespējams veikt esošo instrumentu izvērtējumu vai atbilstības pārbaudes.
 •Pamattiesības
 Statusa nolīgumā ir iekļauti noteikumi, kas nodrošina, ka tiek aizsargātas to personu pamattiesības, kuras ietekmē to vienības dalībnieku darbības, kas ir iesaistīti Eiropas Robežu un krasta apsardzes aģentūras koordinētajā darbībā.
 Noteikumi par pamattiesībām ir sīkāk paskaidroti 5. punktā “Citi elementi”.
 4.IETEKME UZ BUDŽETU
 Statusa nolīgumam kā tādam nav finansiālas ietekmes. Patiesībā izmaksas radīs reālā Eiropas Robežu un krasta apsardzes vienību izvietošana, kas notiks, pamatojoties uz operatīvo plānu un attiecīgo dotāciju nolīgumu; tās sedz no Eiropas Robežu un krasta apsardzes aģentūras budžeta. Statusa nolīgumā paredzētās turpmākās operācijas finansēs, izmantojot Eiropas Robežu un krasta apsardzes aģentūras pašu resursus.
 5.CITI ELEMENTI
 •Īstenošanas plāni un uzraudzīšanas, izvērtēšanas un ziņošanas kārtība
 Komisija nodrošinās statusa nolīguma īstenošanas pienācīgu uzraudzību.
 Serbijas Republika un Eiropas Robežu un krasta apsardzes aģentūra kopīgi izvērtē katru kopīgo operāciju vai ātrās reaģēšanas robežapsardzes pasākumu.
 Eiropas Robežu un krasta apsardzes aģentūra, Serbijas Republika un dalībvalstis, kas piedalās konkrētā darbībā, katras darbības beigās sagatavo ziņojumu par to, kā piemēroti nolīguma noteikumi, tostarp noteikumi par personas datu apstrādi.
 •Paskaidrojošie dokumenti (direktīvām)
 Neattiecas.
 •Konkrētu priekšlikuma noteikumu detalizēts skaidrojums
 Nolīguma piemērošanas joma
 Saskaņā ar šo nolīgumu Eiropas Robežu un krasta apsardzes aģentūra var izvietot Eiropas robežu un krasta apsardzes vienības, kurām ir īstenošanas pilnvaras Serbijas Republikā, kopīgu operāciju un ātrās reaģēšanas robežapsardzes pasākumu veikšanai. Lai gan šis nolīgums nepaplašina darbības jomu nolīgumam starp Eiropas Kopienu un Serbijas Republiku par tādu personu atpakaļuzņemšanu, kuras uzturas nelikumīgi (“EK un Serbijas Republikas atpakaļuzņemšanas nolīgums”)
 4
 , Eiropas Robežu un krasta apsardzes aģentūras vienībām, veicot īpašas atgriešanas darbības, ir atļauts palīdzēt Serbijas Republikai identificēt personas, kuras jāuzņem atpakaļ Serbijas Republikā saskaņā ar EK un Serbijas Republikas atpakaļuzņemšanas nolīgumu.
 Eiropas Robežu un krasta apsardzes vienības Serbijas Republikas teritorijā var izvietot tikai reģionos, kas robežojas ar ES ārējām robežām, un vienības dalībniekiem ir īstenošanas pilnvaras tajās Serbijas Republikas teritorijās, kuras norādītas operatīvajā plānā.
 Darbības uzsākšana
 Aģentūra var ierosināt iniciatīvu darbības uzsākšanai. Serbijas Republikas kompetentās iestādes var pieprasīt aģentūrai apsvērt darbības uzsākšanu. Lai veiktu darbību, ir vajadzīga Serbijas Republikas kompetento iestāžu un aģentūras piekrišana.
 Operatīvais plāns
 Pirms katras kopīgās operācijas vai ātrās reaģēšanas robežapsardzes pasākuma aģentūrai un Serbijas Republikai ir jāsaskaņo operatīvais plāns. Operatīvais plāns ir jāsaskaņo arī ar dalībvalsti vai dalībvalstīm, kas robežojas ar operācijas norises vietu.
 Plānā detalizēti izklāsta kopīgās operācijas vai ātrās reaģēšanas robežapsardzes pasākuma organizatoriskos un procesuālos aspektus, tostarp situācijas, operatīvā nolūka un mērķu aprakstu un novērtējumu, izvietojamā tehniskā aprīkojuma veidu, īstenošanas plānu, sadarbību ar citām trešām valstīm, citām Savienības aģentūrām un struktūrām vai starptautiskām organizācijām, noteikumus attiecībā uz pamattiesībām, tostarp personas datu aizsardzību, koordinācijas, pavēlniecības, kontroles, saziņas un ziņošanas struktūru, organizatorisko kārtību un loģistiku, kopīgās operācijas vai ātrās reaģēšanas robežapsardzes pasākuma novērtējuma un finansiālos aspektus.
 Vienības dalībnieku uzdevumi un pilnvaras
 Parasti vienības dalībniekiem ir tiesības veikt uzdevumus un izmantot īstenošanas pilnvaras, kas nepieciešamas robežkontrolei un atgriešanas operācijām. Viņi ievēro Serbijas Republikas tiesību aktus.
 Serbijas Republikas teritorijā vienības darbojas tikai saskaņā ar Serbijas Republikas robežsargu vai citu policijas darbinieku norādījumiem un to klātbūtnē.
 Vajadzības gadījumā vienības dalībnieki valkā savas uniformas, redzamu personas identifikāciju un zilu rokas apsēju ar Eiropas Savienības un aģentūras atšķirības zīmēm. Lai Serbijas Republikas valsts iestādes varētu tos nepārprotami identificēt, tie līdzi nēsā akreditācijas dokumentu.
 Vienības dalībnieki var nēsāt dienesta ieročus, munīciju un aprīkojumu, kā tas ir atļauts saskaņā ar to piederības dalībvalsts tiesību aktiem un Serbijas Republikas tiesību aktiem. Serbijas Republikas iestādes iepriekš paziņo aģentūrai par atļautajiem dienesta ieročiem, munīciju un aprīkojumu, kā arī par attiecīgo tiesisko regulējumu un to izmantošanas nosacījumiem.
 Vienības dalībnieki ar savas valsts un Serbijas Republikas iestāžu piekrišanu, Serbijas Republikas robežsargu vai citu policijas darbinieku klātbūtnē un saskaņā ar Serbijas Republikas tiesību aktiem var pielietot spēku, tostarp dienesta ieročus, munīciju un aprīkojumu. Serbijas Republikas iestādes var atļaut vienības dalībniekiem pielietot spēku arī tad, ja tās robežsargu nav klāt. Vienības dalībnieki drīkst izmantot ieročus tikai tad, ja tas ir absolūti nepieciešams pašaizsardzībai pret dzīvību apdraudošu tūlītēju uzbrukumu, kas vērsts pret viņiem pašiem vai citu personu, saskaņā ar Serbijas tiesību aktiem.
 Serbijas Republikas kompetentās iestādes var pēc pieprasījuma paziņot attiecīgu informāciju, kas ietverta valsts datubāzēs, vienības dalībniekiem, ja tas nepieciešams to uzdevumu veikšanai. Aģentūra var arī paziņot Serbijas kompetentajām iestādēm informāciju, kas nepieciešama operatīvo mērķu sasniegšanai.
 Darbības apturēšana un izbeigšana
 Gan aģentūra, gan Serbijas Republikas iestādes var apturēt vai izbeigt darbību, ja tās uzskata, ka otra puse neievēro nolīguma noteikumus vai operatīvo plānu.
 Vienības dalībnieku privilēģijas un imunitāte
 Attiecībā uz visām darbībām, kas veiktas, pildot oficiālas funkcijas (“pildot dienesta pienākumus”), vienības dalībniekiem ir imunitāte pret Serbijas Republikas krimināltiesisko jurisdikciju, bet šāda imunitāte uz tiem neattiecas par pārkāpumiem, kas izdarīti, “nepildot dienesta pienākumus”.
 Operatīvajā plānā ir precīzi norādītas darbības, uz kurām attiecas imunitāte pret Serbijas Republikas krimināltiesisko jurisdikciju.
 Gadījumā, ja tiek pausts pieņēmums par iespējamu noziedzīgu nodarījumu, ko izdarījuši vienības dalībnieki, aģentūras izpilddirektors pirms tiesvedības uzsākšanas apliecina Serbijas Republikas kompetentajām tiesu iestādēm, vai attiecīgā darbība ir veikta, pildot oficiālās funkcijas. Aģentūras izpilddirektors pieņem lēmumu pēc tam, kad ir rūpīgi pārbaudīts dalībvalsts kompetentās iestādes, kura ir norīkojusi attiecīgo robežsargu vai citus attiecīgos dalībniekus, un Serbijas Republikas kompetento iestāžu faktu izklāsts.
 Vienības dalībniekiem piešķirtās privilēģijas un imunitāte pret Serbijas Republikas krimināltiesisko jurisdikciju neatbrīvo tos no piederības dalībvalsts jurisdikcijas.
 Tāds pats regulējums attiecas uz vienības dalībnieku civiltiesisko un administratīvo atbildību.
 Dalībvalsts, kas ir norīkojusi attiecīgo robežsargu vai citu attiecīgo darbinieku, var atcelt vienību dalībnieku imunitāti pret Serbijas Republikas krimināltiesisko, civiltiesisko un administratīvo jurisdikciju. Šādai atcelšanai vienmēr jābūt tūlītējai atcelšanai.
 Nolīgumā ir paredzēts mehānisms kaitējumu atlīdzināšanai. Šāda kompensācijas mehānisma pamatā ir 42. pants Regulā (ES) 2016/1624 par Eiropas Robežu un krasta apsardzi. Ja kaitējumu ir nodarījis vienības dalībnieks, pildot dienesta pienākumus, atbildīga ir Serbijas Republika. Ja kaitējumu ir nodarījis iesaistītās dalībvalsts vienības dalībnieks, pildot dienesta pienākumus, rupjas nolaidības vai tīša pārkāpuma dēļ vai nepildot dienesta pienākumus, Serbijas Republika var pieprasīt aģentūras izpilddirektoram, lai attiecīgā iesaistītā dalībvalsts maksā kompensāciju. Ja aģentūras personāls nodara kaitējumu, Serbijas Republika var pieprasīt, lai aģentūra maksā kompensāciju.
 Vienības dalībniekiem nevar piemērot izpildes pasākumus, izņemot gadījumus, ja pret viņiem sāk kriminālprocesu vai civiltiesvedību, kas nav saistīta ar oficiālajām funkcijām.
 Vienības dalībnieku īpašumu, kas vajadzīgs to oficiālo funkciju pildīšanai, nevar arestēt. Uz vienības dalībniekiem civiltiesvedībā neattiecas personas brīvības ierobežojumi vai kādi citi ierobežojoši pasākumi.
 Par aģentūrai sniegtajiem pakalpojumiem vienības dalībnieki ir atbrīvoti no sociālā nodrošinājuma noteikumiem, kas var būt spēkā Serbijas Republikā. Tie Serbijas Republikā ir atbrīvoti arī no jebkāda veida nodokļiem, ko ietur no algas un ienākumiem, kurus tiem maksā aģentūra vai to dalībvalstis, kā arī no ienākumiem, ko viņi saņem ārpus Serbijas Republikas.
 Serbijas Republikas iestādes ļauj ievest un izvest priekšmetus vienības dalībnieku personiskām vajadzībām un atbrīvo šādus priekšmetus no visiem muitas nodokļiem, citiem nodokļiem un saistītiem maksājumiem, kas nav maksa par glabāšanu, transportu un tamlīdzīgiem pakalpojumiem.
 Vienības dalībnieku personisko bagāžu var pārbaudīt tikai tad, ja ir pamats uzskatīt, ka tajā ir priekšmeti, kas nav paredzēti vienības dalībnieku personiskai lietošanai, vai priekšmeti, kuru imports vai eksports Serbijas Republikā ir aizliegts ar likumu vai uz kuriem attiecas tās karantīnas noteikumi. Šādas personīgās bagāžas pārbaudi veic vienīgi attiecīgās vienības dalībnieka(-u) vai aģentūras pilnvarota pārstāvja klātbūtnē.
 Vienības dalībnieku dokumenti, sarakste un īpašums ir neaizskarams, izņemot gadījumus, ja piemēro izpildes pasākumus. Vienības dalībniekiem nav pienākuma sniegt liecības tiesā.
 Akreditācijas dokuments
 Aģentūra, sadarbojoties ar Serbijas Republiku, identificēšanas nolūkos attiecībā pret Serbijas Republikas iestādēm, izsniedz vienības dalībniekiem akreditācijas dokumentu, kas apliecina šā dokumenta turētāja tiesības veikt uzdevumus un īstenot pilnvaras, kuras tam piešķirtas ar šo nolīgumu un operatīvo plānu. Akreditācijas dokuments kopā ar derīgu ceļošanas dokumentu vienības dalībniekam ļauj ieceļot Serbijas Republikā bez vīzas vai iepriekšējas atļaujas; darbības beigās to nodod aģentūrai. Aģentūra nodrošinās kompetentajām Serbijas iestādēm akreditācijas dokumenta paraugu pirms nolīguma piemērošanas sākuma un ikreiz, kad veidne tiek mainīta.
 Pamattiesības
 Veicot uzdevumus un īstenojot pilnvaras, vienības dalībnieki pilnībā ievēro pamattiesības un pamatbrīvības, tostarp attiecībā uz piekļuvi patvēruma procedūrām, cilvēka cieņu, spīdzināšanas un necilvēcīgas vai pazemojošas attieksmes aizliegumu, tiesības uz brīvību, neizraidīšanas principu un kolektīvās izraidīšanas aizliegumu, bērna tiesības un tiesības uz privātās un ģimenes dzīves neaizskaramību. Viņi patvaļīgi nediskriminē personas dzimuma, rases vai etniskās izcelsmes, reliģijas vai pārliecības, invaliditātes, vecuma vai seksuālās orientācijas dēļ. Visi pasākumi, kas skar šīs pamattiesības un pamatbrīvības, ir samērīgi ar šo pasākumu mērķiem un ievēro šo pamattiesību un pamatbrīvību būtību.
 Katrai pusei ir jābūt sūdzību mehānismam, ar kura palīdzību izskatīt iespējamos pamattiesību pārkāpumus, ko izdarījis tās personāls. Aģentūra ir izveidojusi Regulas (ES) 2016/1624 par Eiropas Robežu un krasta apsardzi 72. pantā minēto sūdzību mehānismu, un tādējādi tā izpilda šo pienākumu. Serbijas Republikas Ombuds (“pilsoņu tiesību aizstāvis”) varētu izskatīt šādus iespējamos pārkāpumus, izņemot gadījumus, ja Serbijas Republikas iestādes nolemj izveidot mehānismu, kurš ir īpaši paredzēts tam, lai izskatītu sūdzības, kas iesniegtas saskaņā ar šo nolīgumu.
 Personas datu apstrāde
 Vienības dalībnieki apstrādā personas datus, ja tas ir nepieciešams un ir samērīgi ar noteikumiem, kas piemērojami aģentūrai un ES dalībvalstīm. Personas datu apstrāde, ko veic Serbijas Republikas iestādes, notiek saskaņā ar tās tiesību aktiem.
 Aģentūra, iesaistītās dalībvalstis un Serbijas Republikas iestādes katras darbības beigās sagatavo kopīgu ziņojumu par vienības dalībnieku veikto personas datu apstrādi. Šo ziņojumu nosūta aģentūras pamattiesību amatpersonai un datu aizsardzības inspektoram, kā arī Serbijas Republikas personas datu aizsardzības kompetentajai iestādei. Aģentūras pamattiesību amatpersona un datu aizsardzības inspektors ziņo aģentūras izpilddirektoram.
 Domstarpības un interpretācija
 Visus jautājumus, kas rodas saistībā ar šā nolīguma piemērošanu, kopīgi izskata Serbijas Republikas kompetento iestāžu pārstāvji un aģentūras pārstāvji, konsultējoties ar attiecīgo dalībvalsti vai dalībvalstīm, kas robežojas ar Serbijas Republiku.
 Ja iepriekš nav panākts izlīgums, domstarpības par šā nolīguma interpretāciju vai piemērošanu izšķir tikai sarunu ceļā starp Serbijas Republiku un Eiropas Komisiju, kas apspriežas ar ikvienu dalībvalsti, kas robežojas ar Serbijas Republiku.
 Kompetentās iestādes šā nolīguma īstenošanai
 Serbijas Republikas kompetentā iestāde šā nolīguma īstenošanai ir Iekšlietu ministrija. Eiropas Savienībai tā ir Eiropas Robežu un krasta apsardzes aģentūra.
 Kopīgās deklarācijas
 Abas puses ņem vērā, ka Eiropas Robežu un krasta apsardzes aģentūra palīdzēs Serbijas Republikai efektīvi kontrolēt savu robežu ar jebkuru valsti, kas nav Eiropas Savienības dalībniece, izmantojot citus līdzekļus, kuri nav Eiropas Robežu un krasta apsardzes vienību, kam ir īstenošanas pilnvaras, izvietošana.
 Abas puses vienojas, ka nedz šis nolīgums, nedz arī kāda darbība, ko veikušas puses, vai kas veiktas to vārdā, tostarp operatīvo plānu izstrādāšana vai līdzdalība pārrobežu sadarbībā, nekādā veidā neietekmē Serbijas un Eiropas Savienības dalībvalstu teritoriju statusu un delimitāciju, uz kurām attiecas starptautiskie tiesību akti.
 Nolīgumam pievienotajā kopīgajā deklarācijā ir atspoguļota Norvēģijas, Islandes, Šveices un Lihtenšteinas ciešā iesaistīšanās Šengenas acquis īstenošanā, piemērošanā un pilnveidošanā.
 2018/0410 (NLE)
 Priekšlikums
 PADOMES LĒMUMS
 par to, lai Savienības vārdā parakstītu statusa nolīgumu starp Eiropas Savienību un Serbijas Republiku par darbībām, ko Serbijas Republikā veic Eiropas Robežu un krasta apsardzes aģentūra
 EIROPAS SAVIENĪBAS PADOME,
 ņemot vērā Līgumu par Eiropas Savienības darbību un jo īpaši tā 77. panta 2. punkta b) un d) apakšpunktu un 79. panta 2. punkta c) apakšpunktu saistībā ar 218. panta 5. punktu,
 ņemot vērā Eiropas Komisijas priekšlikumu,
 tā kā:
 (1)Saskaņā ar Regulas (ES) 2016/1624
 5
 54. panta 4. punktu gadījumos, kad ir paredzēts, ka Eiropas Robežu un krasta apsardzes vienības ir izvietotas trešā valstī, lai veiktu darbības, kurās vienības dalībniekiem ir īstenošanas pilnvaras vai ja citas darbības trešās valstīs to pieprasa, Savienība ar attiecīgo trešo valsti noslēdz statusa nolīgumu. Statusa nolīgumam būtu jāietver visi aspekti, kas vajadzīgi, lai veiktu minētās darbības.
 (2)Padome 2017. gada 21. februārī deva Komisijai atļauju sākt sarunas ar Serbijas Republiku par statusa nolīgumu par darbībām, ko Serbijas Republikā veic Eiropas Robežu un krasta apsardzes aģentūra.
 (3)Sarunas par statusa nolīgumu tika sāktas 2017. gada 7. aprīlī, un tās tika sekmīgi noslēgtas 2018. gada 20. septembrī, parafējot nolīgumu starp Eiropas Savienību un Serbijas Republiku par darbībām, ko Serbijas Republikā veic Eiropas Robežu un krasta apsardzes aģentūra (“statusa nolīgums”).
 (4)Šis lēmums ir to Šengenas acquis noteikumu pilnveidošana, kuru īstenošanā Apvienotā Karaliste nepiedalās saskaņā ar Padomes Lēmumu 2000/365/EK
 6
 ; tādēļ Apvienotā Karaliste nepiedalās šā lēmuma pieņemšanā, un Apvienotajai Karalistei šis lēmums nav saistošs un nav jāpiemēro.
 (5)Šis lēmums ir to Šengenas acquis noteikumu pilnveidošana, kuru īstenošanā Īrija nepiedalās saskaņā ar Padomes Lēmumu 2002/192/EK
 7
 ; tādēļ Īrija nepiedalās šā lēmuma pieņemšanā, un Īrijai šis lēmums nav saistošs un nav jāpiemēro.
 (6)Saskaņā ar 1. un 2. pantu Protokolā Nr. 22 par Dānijas nostāju, kas pievienots Līgumam par Eiropas Savienību un Līgumam par Eiropas Savienības darbību, Dānija nepiedalās šā lēmuma pieņemšanā, un Dānijai šis lēmums nav saistošs un nav jāpiemēro.
 (7)Tāpēc statusa nolīgums būtu jāparaksta un nolīgumam pievienotās deklarācijas būtu jāapstiprina Savienības vārdā, ņemot vērā tā noslēgšanu vēlāk,
 IR PIEŅĒMUSI ŠO LĒMUMU.
 1. pants
 Ar šo Savienības vārdā tiek apstiprināta Nolīguma starp Eiropas Savienību un Serbijas Republiku par darbībām, ko Serbijas Republikā veic Eiropas Robežu un krasta apsardzes aģentūra, (“nolīgums”) parakstīšana, ņemot vērā minētā nolīguma noslēgšanu.
 2. pants
 Savienības vārdā tiek apstiprinātas šim lēmumam pievienotās deklarācijas.
 3. pants
 Padomes Ģenerālsekretariāts izveido instrumentu, ar ko nolīguma sarunu vadītāja norādītajai personai vai personām piešķir visas pilnvaras parakstīt nolīgumu, ņemot vērā tā noslēgšanu.
 4. pants
 Šis lēmums stājas spēkā tā pieņemšanas dienā.
 Briselē,
 Padomes vārdā —
 priekšsēdētājs
 (1)
 OV L 251, 16.9.2016., 1. lpp.
 (2)
 COM(2015) 240 final.
 (3)
 COM(2015) 185 final.
 (4)
 OV L 334, 19.12.2007., 46. lpp.
 (5)
 Eiropas Parlamenta un Padomes Regula (ES) 2016/1624 (2016. gada 14. septembris) par Eiropas Robežu un krasta apsardzi un ar ko groza Eiropas Parlamenta un Padomes Regulu (ES) 2016/399 un ar ko atceļ Eiropas Parlamenta un Padomes Regulu (EK) Nr. 863/2007, Padomes Regulu (EK) Nr. 2007/2004 un Padomes Lēmumu 2005/267/EK (OV L 251, 16.9.2016., 1. lpp.).
 (6)
 Padomes Lēmums 2000/365/EK (2000. gada 29. maijs) par Lielbritānijas un Ziemeļīrijas Apvienotās Karalistes lūgumu piedalīties dažu Šengenas acquis noteikumu īstenošanā (OV L 131, 1.6.2000., 43. lpp.).
 (7)
 Padomes Lēmums 2002/192/EK (2002. gada 28. februāris) par Īrijas lūgumu piedalīties dažu Šengenas acquis noteikumu īstenošanā (OV L 64, 7.3.2002., 20. lpp.).
 ---documentbreak---
 EIROPAS KOMISIJA
 Briselē, 7.12.2018
 COM(2018) 799 final
 PIELIKUMS
 dokumentam
 Priekšlikums padomes Lēmumam
 par to, lai Savienības vārdā parakstītu statusa nolīgumu starp Eiropas Savienību un Serbijas Republiku par darbībām, ko Serbijas Republikā veic Eiropas Robežu un krasta apsardzes aģentūra
 PIELIKUMS
 NOLĪGUMS
 starp Eiropas Savienību un Serbijas Republiku par darbībām, ko Serbijas Republikā veic Eiropas Robežu un krasta apsardzes aģentūra
 EIROPAS SAVIENĪBA
 un SERBIJAS REPUBLIKA,
 turpmāk “puses”,
 TĀ KĀ var rasties situācijas, kurās Eiropas Robežu un krasta apsardzes aģentūra var koordinēt operatīvo sadarbību starp ES dalībvalstīm un Serbijas Republiku, tostarp Serbijas Republikas teritorijā,
 TĀ KĀ būtu jāizveido tiesiskais regulējums statusa nolīguma veidā attiecībā uz situācijām, kad Eiropas Robežu un krasta apsardzes aģentūras vienību dalībniekiem var būt īstenošanas pilnvaras Serbijas Republikas teritorijā,
 TĀ KĀ puses, īstenojot šo statusa nolīgumu, pienācīgi ņem vērā pievienotās deklarācijas,
 ŅEMOT VĒRĀ, ka Eiropas Robežu un krasta apsardzes aģentūrai, īstenojot visas darbības Serbijas Republikas teritorijā, būtu pilnībā jāievēro pamattiesības,
 IR NOLĒMUŠAS NOSLĒGT ŠO NOLĪGUMU.
 1. pants
 Nolīguma darbības joma
 1. Šis nolīgums ietver visus Serbijas Republikas un Eiropas Robežu un krasta apsardzes aģentūras sadarbības aspektus, kas nepieciešami Eiropas Robežu un krasta apsardzes aģentūras darbību veikšanai, kuras varētu norisināties Serbijas Republikas teritorijā un attiecībā uz kurām Eiropas Robežu un krasta apsardzes vienību dalībniekiem var būt īstenošanas pilnvaras.
 2.Šis nolīgums nepaplašina darbības jomu nolīgumam starp Eiropas Kopienu un Serbijas Republiku par tādu personu atpakaļuzņemšanu, kuras uzturas neatļauti (“ES un Serbijas Republikas atpakaļuzņemšanas nolīgums”). Saistībā ar atgriešanas operācijām, kā tās definētas 2. panta d) punktā, šis nolīgums attiecas tikai uz operatīvā atbalsta sniegšanu atgriešanas operācijām, kuras tiek veiktas saskaņā ar ES un Serbijas Republikas atpakaļuzņemšanas nolīgumu.
 3.Šis nolīgums attiecas uz Serbijas Republiku. Šis nolīgums neattiecas uz Kosovu
 1
 *.
 2. pants
 Definīcijas
 Nolīgumā piemēro šādas definīcijas:
 a)
 “darbība” ir kopīga operācija, ātrās reaģēšanas robežapsardzes pasākums vai atgriešanas operācija;
 b)
 “kopīga operācija” ir darbība, kuras mērķis ir apkarot nelegālu imigrāciju vai pārrobežu noziedzību vai arī pastiprināt tehnisko un operatīvo palīdzību pie Serbijas Republikas ārējām robežām ar kaimiņos esošu dalībvalsti un kura norisinās Serbijas Republikas teritorijā;
 c)
 “ātrās reaģēšanas robežapsardzes pasākums” ir darbība, kuras mērķis ir ātri reaģēt situācijā, kad pastāv konkrētas un nesamērīgi lielas problēmas pie Serbijas Republikas robežām ar kaimiņos esošu dalībvalsti, un kura uz ierobežotu laiku norisinās Serbijas Republikas teritorijā;
 d)
 “atgriešanas operācija” ir operācija, kuru organizē un koordinē aģentūra un kurā ir iesaistīts vienas vai vairāku dalībvalstu sniegts tehniskais un operatīvais atbalsts, un kuras laikā personas, par kurām ir pieņemts galīgais lēmums par atgriešanu, no vienas vai vairākām dalībvalstīm piespiedu kārtā vai brīvprātīgi tiek atgrieztas Serbijas Republikā saskaņā ar nolīgumu starp Eiropas Kopienu un Serbijas Republiku par tādu personu atpakaļuzņemšanu, kuras uzturas neatļauti;
 e)
 “robežkontrole” ir personu, ceļošanas dokumentu, transportlīdzekļu un priekšmetu kontrole, ko veic, šķērsojot valsts robežu, un kas ietver robežpārbaudes robežšķērsošanas vietās un robežuzraudzību starp robežšķērsošanas vietām;
 f)
 “vienības dalībnieks” ir vai nu aģentūras darbinieks, vai robežsargu vienības dalībnieks un cits attiecīgais darbinieks no iesaistītajām dalībvalstīm, tostarp robežsargi un citi attiecīgi darbinieki, kurus dalībvalstis norīkojušas uz aģentūru un kuri jāizvieto operācijas laikā;
 g)
 “dalībvalsts” ir Eiropas Savienības dalībvalsts;
 h)
 “piederības dalībvalsts” ir dalībvalsts, kuras robežsargs vai cits attiecīgs darbinieks ir vienības dalībnieks;
 i)
 “personas dati” ir jebkuri dati, kas attiecas uz identificētu vai identificējamu fizisku personu; un identificējama persona ir persona, kuru tieši vai netieši var identificēt, jo īpaši izmantojot tādus identifikatorus kā, piemēram, vārdu, uzvārdu, identifikācijas numuru, t. i., unikālu pilsoņa identifikācijas numuru, atrašanās vietas datus, tiešsaistes identifikatoru vai vienu vai vairākus minētajai fiziskajai personai raksturīgus fiziskās, fizioloģiskās, ģenētiskās, garīgās, ekonomiskās, kultūras vai sociālās identitātes parametrus;
 j)
 “iesaistītā dalībvalsts” ir dalībvalsts, kas piedalās operācijā Serbijas Republikā, nodrošinot tehnisko aprīkojumu, robežsargus un citus attiecīgus darbiniekus, kuri izvietoti kā daļa no vienības;
 k)
 “aģentūra” ir Eiropas Robežu un krasta apsardzes aģentūra, kas izveidota ar Regulu (ES) 2016/1624 par Eiropas Robežu un krasta apsardzi.
 3. pants
 Darbības un operatīvā plāna uzsākšana
 1. Aģentūra var izteikt iniciatīvu Serbijas Republikas kompetentajām iestādēm uzsākt darbību. Serbijas Republikas kompetentās iestādes var pieprasīt aģentūrai apsvērt darbības uzsākšanu.
 2. Lai veiktu darbības, ir vajadzīga gan Serbijas Republikas kompetento iestāžu, gan arī aģentūras piekrišana.
 3. Vienotajā operatīvajā plānā aģentūra un Serbijas Republika vienojas par katru kopīgo operāciju vai ātrās reaģēšanas robežapsardzes pasākumu. Eiropas Komisija nodrošina, ka tiek ievēroti Regulas par Eiropas Robežu un krasta apsardzi 54. panta 3. punkta noteikumi.
 Plānā detalizēti izklāsta kopīgās operācijas vai ātrās reaģēšanas robežapsardzes pasākuma organizatoriskos un procesuālos aspektus, tostarp situācijas, operatīvā nolūka un mērķu aprakstu un novērtējumu, izvietojamā tehniskā aprīkojuma veidu, īstenošanas plānu, sadarbību ar citām trešām valstīm, citām Savienības aģentūrām un struktūrām vai starptautiskām organizācijām, noteikumus attiecībā uz pamattiesībām, tostarp personas datu aizsardzību, koordinācijas, pavēlniecības, kontroles, saziņas un ziņošanas struktūru, organizatorisko kārtību un loģistiku, kopīgās operācijas vai ātrās reaģēšanas robežapsardzes pasākuma novērtējuma un finansiālos aspektus. Kopīgās operācijas vai ātrās reaģēšanas robežapsardzes pasākuma novērtējumu veic kopīgi ar Serbijas Republikas kompetento iestādi un aģentūru.
 4. pants
 Vienības dalībnieku uzdevumi un pilnvaras
 1.Vienības dalībniekiem ir tiesības veikt uzdevumus un izmantot īstenošanas pilnvaras, kas nepieciešamas robežkontrolei un atgriešanas operācijām.
 2.Vienības dalībnieki ievēro Serbijas Republikas normatīvos aktus.
 3.Vienības dalībnieki var veikt uzdevumus un īstenot pilnvaras Serbijas Republikas teritorijā tikai saskaņā ar Serbijas Republikas robežsargu vai citu attiecīgu policijas ierēdņu norādījumiem un tikai viņu klātbūtnē. Serbijas Republikas kompetentā iestāde vienībai vajadzības gadījumā dod norādījumus saskaņā ar operatīvo plānu. Serbijas Republikas kompetentā iestāde var atļaut vienību dalībniekiem rīkoties tās vārdā pastāvīgi ar nosacījumu, ka vispārējā atbildība un vadības un kontroles funkcijas paliek vienmēr dežūrējošo Serbijas Republikas robežsargu vai citu policijas ierēdņu pārziņā.
 Aģentūra ar sava koordinatora palīdzību var paziņot Serbijas Republikas kompetentajai iestādei savu viedokli par vienībai sniegtajiem norādījumiem. Tādā gadījumā Serbijas Republikas kompetentā iestāde ņem vērā šo viedokli un pēc iespējas to ievēro.
 Gadījumos, kad vienībai sniegtie norādījumi neatbilst operatīvajam plānam, koordinators nekavējoties ziņo aģentūras izpilddirektoram. Izpilddirektors var veikt atbilstošus pasākumus, tostarp apturēt vai izbeigt darbību.
 4.Vienības dalībnieki, veicot uzdevumus un īstenojot pilnvaras, valkā savas uniformas. Vienības dalībnieki nēsā vismaz redzamu personas identifikāciju un zilu rokas apsēju ar Eiropas Savienības un aģentūras atšķirības zīmēm. Identificēšanas nolūkos attiecībā pret Serbijas Republikas kompetentajām iestādēm vienības dalībnieki vienmēr nēsā līdzi 7. pantā minēto akreditācijas dokumentu.
 5.Veicot uzdevumus, vienības dalībnieki var nēsāt dienesta ieročus, munīciju un aprīkojumu, kā tas ir atļauts saskaņā ar piederības dalībvalsts tiesību aktiem. Serbijas Republika pirms vienības dalībnieku izvietošanas informē aģentūru par atļautajiem dienesta ieročiem, munīciju un aprīkojumu, kā arī par attiecīgo tiesisko regulējumu un to izmantošanas nosacījumiem. Aģentūra iepriekš iesniedz Serbijas Republikas kompetentajai iestādei sarakstu par vienības dalībnieku dienesta ieročiem, proti, informāciju par ieroču veidu un sērijas numuru, kā arī par munīcijas veidu un daudzumu.
 6.Veicot uzdevumus un īstenojot pilnvaras, vienības dalībniekiem ar piederības dalībvalsts un Serbijas Republikas piekrišanu Serbijas Republikas robežsargu vai citu policijas ierēdņu klātbūtnē un saskaņā ar Serbijas Republikas tiesību aktiem ir atļauts pielietot spēku, tostarp dienesta ieročus, munīciju un aprīkojumu. Serbijas Republika var atļaut vienības dalībniekiem pielietot spēku, ja Serbijas Republikas robežsargu vai citu policijas ierēdņu nav klāt. Vienības dalībnieki drīkst izmantot ieročus tikai tad, ja tas ir absolūti nepieciešams pašaizsardzībai pret dzīvību apdraudošu tūlītēju uzbrukumu, kas vērsts pret viņiem pašiem vai citu personu, saskaņā ar Serbijas Republikas tiesību aktiem.
 7.Serbijas Republikas kompetentā iestāde var pēc pieprasījuma paziņot attiecīgu informāciju, kas ietverta valsts datubāzēs, vienības dalībniekiem, ja tas ir nepieciešams operatīvajā plānā norādīto operatīvo mērķu sasniegšanai un darbību īstenošanai. Vienības dalībniekiem var paziņot tikai to informāciju par attiecīgajiem faktiem, kas ir nepieciešama to uzdevumu veikšanai un pilnvaru īstenošanai. Aģentūra var paziņot Serbijas Republikas kompetentajām iestādēm attiecīgu informāciju, kas ir nepieciešama operatīvajā plānā norādīto operatīvo mērķu sasniegšanai un kopīgo darbību īstenošanai.
 8. Operatīvajā plānā norādīto operatīvo mērķu sasniegšanas un darbību īstenošanas nolūkā Serbijas Republikas kompetentā iestāde un vienības dalībnieki var apmainīties ar citu informāciju un konstatējumiem.
 9. Lēmuma 1. un 3.–6. punktā minētie vienības dalībnieki nav aģentūras dalībnieki.
 5. pants
 Darbības apturēšana un izbeigšana
 1. Ja Serbijas Republika pienācīgi neīsteno šā nolīguma vai operatīvā plāna noteikumus, aģentūras izpilddirektors darbību var apturēt vai izbeigt pēc tam, kad par to rakstiski ir informējis Serbijas Republikas kompetento iestādi. Izpilddirektors informē Serbijas Republikas kompetento iestādi par attiecīgajiem iemesliem.
 2. Ja aģentūra vai jebkura iesaistītā dalībvalsts pienācīgi neīsteno šā nolīguma vai operatīvā plāna noteikumus, Serbijas Republika darbību var apturēt vai izbeigt pēc tam, kad par to ir rakstiski informējusi aģentūru. Serbijas Republikas kompetentā iestāde informē aģentūru par attiecīgajiem iemesliem.
 3. Aģentūras izpilddirektors vai Serbijas Republika var apturēt vai izbeigt darbību jo īpaši gadījumos, kad tiek pārkāptas pamattiesības, netiek ievērots neizraidīšanas princips vai datu aizsardzības noteikumi.
 4. Darbības izbeigšana neietekmē tiesības vai pienākumus, kas rodas, piemērojot šo nolīgumu vai operatīvo plānu pirms šādas izbeigšanas.
 6. pants
 Vienības dalībnieku privilēģijas un imunitāte
 1. Vienības dalībnieku dokumenti, sarakste un īpašums ir neaizskarams, izņemot gadījumus, ja piemēro izpildes pasākumus, kurus atļauts veikt saskaņā ar 6. punktu.
 2. Vienības dalībniekiem ir imunitāte pret Serbijas Republikas krimināltiesisko jurisdikciju par darbībām, kas veiktas, pildot oficiālās funkcijas un oficiālo funkciju izpildes nolūkā saskaņā ar operatīvo plānu īstenoto darbību ietvaros.
 Gadījumā, ja pastāv pieņēmums, ka vienības dalībnieks ir izdarījis noziedzīgu nodarījumu, šā nolīguma 12. panta 1. punktā minētā kompetentā iestāde nekavējoties informē aģentūras izpilddirektoru un piederības dalībvalsts kompetento iestādi.
 Aģentūras izpilddirektors, pēc piederības dalībvalsts un Serbijas Republikas faktu izklāstu rūpīgas izskatīšanas un pamatojoties uz abu pušu sniegto informāciju, apliecina, vai attiecīgā darbība ir veikta, vienības dalībniekam pildot oficiālās funkcijas saskaņā ar operatīvo plānu īstenoto darbību ietvaros.
 Ja aģentūras izpilddirektors apliecina, ka darbība ir veikta, vienības dalībniekam pildot oficiālās funkcijas saskaņā ar operatīvo plānu īstenoto darbību ietvaros, vienības dalībniekam ir imunitāte pret Serbijas Republikas krimināltiesisko jurisdikciju par darbībām, kas veiktas, pildot oficiālās funkcijas un oficiālo funkciju izpildes nolūkā saskaņā ar operatīvo plānu īstenoto darbību ietvaros.
 3. Vienības dalībniekiem ir imunitāte pret Serbijas Republikas civiltiesisko un administratīvo jurisdikciju par darbībām, kas veiktas, pildot oficiālās funkcijas un oficiālo funkciju izpildes nolūkā saskaņā ar operatīvo plānu īstenoto darbību ietvaros.
 Ja kāda tiesa ierosina civiltiesvedību pret vienības dalībniekiem, šā nolīguma 12. panta 1. punktā minētā kompetentā iestāde par to nekavējoties informē aģentūras izpilddirektoru un piederības dalībvalsts kompetento iestādi.
 Aģentūras izpilddirektors, pēc piederības dalībvalsts un Serbijas Republikas faktu izklāstu rūpīgas izskatīšanas un pamatojoties uz abu pušu sniegto informāciju, apliecina, vai attiecīgā darbība ir veikta, vienības dalībniekam pildot oficiālās funkcijas saskaņā ar operatīvo plānu īstenoto darbību ietvaros.
 Ja aģentūras izpilddirektors apliecina, ka darbība ir veikta, vienības dalībniekam pildot oficiālās funkcijas saskaņā ar operatīvo plānu īstenoto darbību ietvaros, vienības dalībniekam ir imunitāte pret Serbijas Republikas civiltiesisko un administratīvo jurisdikciju par darbībām, kas veiktas, pildot oficiālās funkcijas un oficiālo funkciju izpildes nolūkā saskaņā ar operatīvo plānu īstenoto darbību ietvaros.
 4. Saskaņā ar 2. un 3. punktu piederības dalībvalsts vajadzības gadījumā var atcelt vienības dalībnieku imunitāti pret Serbijas Republikas krimināltiesisko, civiltiesisko un administratīvo jurisdikciju. Šādai atcelšanai vienmēr jābūt tūlītējai atcelšanai.
 5. Vienības dalībniekiem nav pienākuma sniegt liecības tiesā.
 6.Ja kaitējumu ir nodarījis vienības dalībnieks, pildot oficiālās funkcijas saskaņā ar operatīvo plānu īstenoto darbību ietvaros, Serbijas Republika ir atbildīga par jebkuru kaitējumu.
 Ja kaitējums nodarīts rupjas nolaidības vai tīša pārkāpuma dēļ vai ja iesaistītās dalībvalsts vienības dalībnieks darbību nav veicis, pildot oficiālās funkcijas, Serbijas Republika ar izpilddirektora starpniecību var pieprasīt, lai attiecīgā iesaistītā dalībvalsts maksā kompensāciju.
 Ja kaitējums nodarīts rupjas nolaidības vai tīša pārkāpuma dēļ, vai, ja vienības dalībnieks, kurš ir aģentūras darbinieks, darbību nav veicis, pildot oficiālās funkcijas, Serbijas Republika var pieprasīt, lai aģentūra maksā kompensāciju.
 Ja Serbijas Republikā kaitējums radies force majeure dēļ, ne Serbijas Republika, ne iesaistītā dalībvalsts, ne aģentūra nenes nekādu atbildību.
 7. Vienības dalībniekiem nevar piemērot izpildes pasākumus, izņemot gadījumus, ja pret viņiem sāk kriminālprocesu vai civiltiesvedību, kas nav saistīta ar oficiālajām funkcijām. Vienības dalībnieku īpašumu, par ko aģentūras izpilddirektors apliecina, ka tas ir vajadzīgs minētā personāla oficiālo funkciju pildīšanai, nevar arestēt, izpildot tiesas nolēmumu, lēmumu vai rīkojumu. Uz vienības dalībniekiem civiltiesvedībā neattiecas personas brīvības ierobežojumi vai kādi citi ierobežojoši pasākumi.
 8. Vienības dalībnieku imunitāte pret Serbijas Republikas jurisdikciju neatbrīvo tos no attiecīgo piederības dalībvalstu jurisdikcijas.
 9. Attiecībā uz vienības dalībnieku sniegtiem pakalpojumiem aģentūrai vienības dalībnieki ir atbrīvoti no sociālā nodrošinājuma noteikumiem, kas var būt spēkā Serbijas Republikā.
 10. Vienības dalībnieki Serbijas Republikā ir atbrīvoti no jebkāda veida nodokļiem, ko ietur no algas un ienākumiem, kurus tiem maksā aģentūra vai piederības dalībvalstis, kā arī no ienākumiem, ko viņi saņem ārpus Serbijas Republikas.
 11. Serbijas Republika saskaņā ar normatīvajiem aktiem, ko tā var pieņemt, ļauj ievest priekšmetus vienības dalībnieku personiskām vajadzībām un atbrīvo šādus priekšmetus no visiem muitas nodokļiem, citiem nodokļiem un saistītiem maksājumiem, kas nav maksa par glabāšanu, transportu un tamlīdzīgiem pakalpojumiem. Serbijas Republika arī ļauj šādus priekšmetus eksportēt.
 12. Vienības dalībnieku personisko bagāžu var pārbaudīt tikai tad, ja ir pamats uzskatīt, ka tajā ir priekšmeti, kas nav paredzēti vienības dalībnieku personiskai lietošanai, vai priekšmeti, kuru imports vai eksports Serbijas Republikā ir aizliegts ar likumu vai uz kuriem attiecas tās karantīnas noteikumi. Šādas personīgās bagāžas pārbaudi veic vienīgi attiecīgās vienības dalībnieka(-u) vai aģentūras pilnvarota pārstāvja klātbūtnē.
 7. pants
 Akreditācijas dokuments
 1. Aģentūra sadarbībā ar Serbijas Republiku katram vienības dalībniekam izsniedz dokumentu Serbijas Republikas oficiālajā(-ās) valodā(-ās) un vienā no Eiropas Savienības iestāžu oficiālajām valodām identificēšanas nolūkos attiecībā pret Serbijas Republikas valsts iestādēm un nolūkā apliecināt šāda dokumenta turētāja tiesības veikt uzdevumus un īstenot pilnvaras, kas minētas šā nolīguma 4. pantā un operatīvajā plānā. Dokumentā ir iekļauti šādi dati par dalībnieku: vārds, uzvārds un valstspiederība; dienesta pakāpe vai amata nosaukums; nesen uzņemta fotogrāfija digitālā formātā un uzdevumi, kurus viņš ir pilnvarots veikt izvietošanas laikā. Tajā arī norāda, ka šā dokumenta turētājam ir tiesības veicamo darbību laikā uzturēties Serbijas Republikas teritorijā bez papildu procedūrām.
 2. Akreditācijas dokuments kopā ar derīgu ceļošanas dokumentu vienības dalībniekam ļauj ieceļot Serbijas Republikā bez vīzas vai iepriekšējas atļaujas.
 3. Akreditācijas dokumentu darbības beigās nodod aģentūrai.
 4. Aģentūra pirms šā nolīguma piemērošanas sākuma un ikreiz, kad veidne tiek mainīta, sniedz Serbijas Republikas kompetentajai iestādei 1. punktā minētā akreditācijas dokumenta paraugu.
 8. pants
 Pamattiesības
 1. Veicot uzdevumus un īstenojot pilnvaras, vienības dalībnieki pilnībā ievēro pamattiesības un pamatbrīvības, tostarp attiecībā uz piekļuvi patvēruma procedūrām, cilvēka cieņu, spīdzināšanas un necilvēcīgas vai pazemojošas attieksmes aizliegumu, tiesības uz brīvību, neizraidīšanas principu un kolektīvās izraidīšanas aizliegumu, bērna tiesības un tiesības uz privātās un ģimenes dzīves neaizskaramību. Pildot uzdevumus un īstenojot pilnvaras, viņi nediskriminē personas dzimuma, rases vai etniskās izcelsmes, reliģijas vai pārliecības, invaliditātes, vecuma, dzimumorientācijas dēļ. Visi pasākumi, ko darbinieki veic, veicot uzdevumus un īstenojot pilnvaras, un kas skar pamattiesības un pamatbrīvības, ir samērīgi ar šo pasākumu mērķiem un ievēro šo pamattiesību un pamatbrīvību būtību.
 2. Ikviena puse izmanto pastāvošo mehānismu, lai izskatītu iespējamos pamattiesību pārkāpumus, ko tās personāls varētu būt veicis, pildot savas oficiālās funkcijas tādas kopīgas operācijas, ātrās reaģēšanas robežapsardzes pasākuma vai atgriešanas operācijas laikā, uz kuru attiecas šis nolīgums.
 9. pants
 Personas datu apstrāde
 1. Personas datu apstrādi veic tikai tad, ja tas ir nepieciešams šā nolīguma īstenošanai Serbijas Republikā, aģentūrā vai iesaistītajās dalībvalstīs.
 2. Personas datu apstrāde, ko veic Serbijas Republikas kompetentā iestāde, notiek saskaņā ar tās tiesību aktiem.
 3. Uz personas datu apstrādi administratīvos nolūkos, ko veic aģentūra un iesaistītā(-ās) dalībvalsts(-is), tostarp nosūtot personas datus uz Serbijas Republiku, attiecas Eiropas Parlamenta un Padomes 2000. gada 18. decembra Regula (EK) Nr. 45/2001 par fizisku personu aizsardzību attiecībā uz personas datu apstrādi Kopienas iestādēs un struktūrās un par šādu datu brīvu apriti, Eiropas Parlamenta un Padomes 1995. gada 24. oktobra Direktīva 95/46/EK par personu aizsardzību attiecībā uz personas datu apstrādi un šādu datu brīvu apriti, Padomes 2008. gada 27. novembra Pamatlēmums 2008/977/TI par tādu personas datu aizsardzību, ko apstrādā, policijas un tiesu iestādēm sadarbojoties krimināllietās, un Regulas (ES) 2016/1624 45. panta 2. punktā minētie aģentūras pieņemtie pasākumi Regulas (EK) Nr. 45/2001 piemērošanai.
 4. Gadījumā, ja apstrāde ietver personas datu nosūtīšanu, dalībvalstis un aģentūra personas datu nosūtīšanas brīdī uz Serbijas Republikas kompetento iestādi norāda ikvienu vispārīgu vai konkrētu ierobežojumu piekļuvei šiem datiem vai to izmantošanai, tostarp attiecībā uz pārsūtīšanu, dzēšanu vai iznīcināšanu. Ja vajadzība pēc šādiem ierobežojumiem kļūst acīmredzama pēc personas datu nosūtīšanas, tad tās attiecīgi informē Serbijas Republikas kompetento iestādi.
 5. Personas datus, kas darbības laikā savākti un apstrādāti administratīvos nolūkos, aģentūra, iesaistītās dalībvalstis un Serbijas Republikas kompetentā iestāde var apstrādāt atbilstīgi datu aizsardzības jomā piemērojamiem tiesību aktiem.
 Šā nolīguma īstenošanas nolūkā Serbijas Republikas kompetentā iestāde glabā saskaņā ar šo pantu savāktos un apstrādātos datus. Reģistrē šādus datus: vārds un uzvārds, dzimšanas datums, dzimšanas vieta, izcelsmes valsts, personas vai citu dokumentu numurs un veids, datu apstrādes vieta un laiks un datu vākšanas un apstrādes iemesls.
 Reģistrētos datus glabā trīs gadus no to ievākšanas dienas.
 6. Aģentūra, iesaistītās dalībvalstis un Serbijas Republika katras darbības beigās izstrādā kopīgu ziņojumu par 1.–5. punkta piemērošanu. Šo ziņojumu nosūta Serbijas Republikas kompetentajām iestādēm, aģentūras pamattiesību amatpersonai un datu aizsardzības amatpersonai. Aģentūras pamattiesību amatpersona un datu aizsardzības amatpersona sniedz ziņojumu aģentūras izpilddirektoram.
 10. pants
 Domstarpības un interpretācija
 1. Visus jautājumus, kas rodas saistībā ar šā nolīguma piemērošanu, kopīgi izskata Serbijas Republikas kompetentās iestādes un aģentūras pārstāvji.
 2. Ja iepriekš nav panākts izlīgums, domstarpības par šā nolīguma interpretāciju vai piemērošanu izšķir tikai sarunu ceļā starp Serbijas Republikas kompetentajām iestādēm un Eiropas Komisiju.
 3. Panta 1. un 2. punkta nolūkā Eiropas Robežu un krasta apsardzes aģentūra un Eiropas Komisija pastāvīgi sazinās ar dalībvalsti vai dalībvalstīm, kas robežojas ar operācijas norises vietu.
 11. pants
 Saistība ar citiem starptautiskajiem pienākumiem
 Šis nolīgums neskar Serbijas Republikas vai Eiropas Savienības saistības, kas uzņemtas, pamatojoties uz starptautiskajiem līgumiem un nolīgumiem, saskaņā ar vispārpieņemtiem starptautisko tiesību principiem, un neskar to piemērošanu.
 12. pants
 Kompetentās iestādes šā nolīguma īstenošanai
 1. Kompetentā iestāde šā nolīguma īstenošanai Serbijas Republikā ir Iekšlietu ministrija.
 2. Kompetentā iestāde šā nolīguma īstenošanai Eiropas Savienībā ir aģentūra.
 13. pants
 Nolīguma stāšanās spēkā, darbības laiks, apturēšana un izbeigšana
 1. Puses apstiprina šo nolīgumu saskaņā ar savām iekšējām juridiskajām procedūrām.
 2. Šis nolīgums stājas spēkā pirmajā dienā, kad sākas otrais mēnesis pēc dienas, kad puses ir paziņojušas viena otrai, ka ir pabeigtas 1. punktā minētās iekšējās juridiskās procedūras.
 3. Nolīgumu var izbeigt vai apturēt, pusēm rakstiski vienojoties vai vienpusēji pēc vienas puses iniciatīvas. Šādā gadījumā puse, kas vēlas to izbeigt vai apturēt, par to rakstiski paziņo otrai pusei ar diplomātisko kanālu starpniecību.
 Apturēšana stājas spēkā pēc desmit (10) darba dienām pēc paziņojuma saņemšanas.
 Nolīguma darbība tiek izbeigta otrā mēneša pirmajā dienā, kurš seko paziņojuma sniegšanas mēnesim.
 4. Paziņojumus, kas veikti saskaņā ar šo pantu, nosūta Eiropas Savienības gadījumā Eiropas Savienības Padomes Ģenerālsekretariātam un Serbijas Republikas gadījumā Serbijas Republikas Ārlietu ministrijai.
 Vieta: ..., datums: ....
 Sagatavots divos eksemplāros angļu, bulgāru, čehu, dāņu, franču, grieķu, holandiešu, horvātu, igauņu, itāļu, latviešu, lietuviešu, maltiešu, poļu, portugāļu, rumāņu, slovāku, slovēņu, somu, spāņu, ungāru, vācu, zviedru un serbu valodā, un visi teksti ir vienlīdz autentiski.
 KOPĪGĀ DEKLARĀCIJA PAR 2. PANTA B) PUNKTU
 Līgumslēdzējas puses ņem vērā, ka Eiropas Robežu un krasta apsardzes aģentūra palīdzēs Serbijas Republikai efektīvi kontrolēt savu robežu ar jebkuru valsti, kas nav Eiropas Savienības dalībniece, izmantojot citus līdzekļus, kuri nav Eiropas Robežu un krasta apsardzes vienību, kam ir īstenošanas pilnvaras, izvietošana.
 Kopīgā deklarācija par teritoriju statusu un delimitāciju
 Ne šis nolīgums, ne arī darbības, ko veikušas puses, vai kas veiktas to vārdā, tostarp operatīvo plānu izstrādāšana vai līdzdalība pārrobežu sadarbībā, nekādā veidā neietekmē Serbijas teritoriju un to teritoriju, kurās piemēro Līgumu par Eiropas Savienību un Līgumu par Eiropas Savienības darbību, statusu un delimitāciju, uz kuru attiecas starptautiskie tiesību akti.
 KOPĪGĀ DEKLARĀCIJA ATTIECĪBĀ UZ ISLANDI, NORVĒĢIJU, ŠVEICI UN LIHTENŠTEINU
 Līgumslēdzējas puses ņem vērā ciešās attiecības starp Eiropas Savienību un Norvēģiju, Islandi, Šveici un Lihtenšteinu, jo īpaši ņemot vērā 1999. gada 18. maija un 2004. gada 26. oktobra nolīgumus par minēto valstu asociēšanu Šengenas acquis īstenošanā, piemērošanā un pilnveidošanā.
 Šādos apstākļos ir vēlams, ka Norvēģijas, Islandes, Šveices un Lihtenšteinas iestādes, no vienas puses, un Serbijas Republika, no otras puses, nekavējoties noslēdz divpusējus nolīgumus par darbībām, ko Serbijas Republikā veic Eiropas Robežu un krasta apsardzes aģentūra, ar tādiem pašiem nosacījumiem kā šajā nolīgumā.
 (1)
 *Šis nosaukums neskar nostājas par statusu un atbilst ANO Drošības padomes Rezolūcijai 1244/1999 un Starptautiskās Tiesas atzinumam par Kosovas neatkarības deklarāciju.


text:
user warning: Table './naujienos01/cache_filter' is marked as crashed and should be repaired query: SELECT data, created, headers, expire, serialized FROM cache_filter WHERE cid = '3:a9d3eb50e81d81d573763c9cbadef4fa' in /srv/www/htdocs/naujienos/includes/cache.inc on line 26.
 user warning: Table './naujienos01/cache_filter' is marked as crashed and should be repaired query: UPDATE cache_filter SET data = '
Mobiliųjų programėlių lyderė Lietuvoje „Lemon Labs“ metė iššūkį „Google Maps“ žemėlapiais paremtoms programėlėms. Lietuvių kompanija kuria sprendimą „Beacon Lab“, kuris mobiliųjų vartotojų vietai nustatyti uždarose patalpose naudos pasaulyje sparčiai populiarėjančią technologiją „Beacon“ (liet. švyturys), kuri veikia „Bluetooth low energy“ („Bluetooth LE“) pagrindu.
\n', created = 1569254805, expire = 1569341205, headers = '', serialized = 0 WHERE cid = '3:a9d3eb50e81d81d573763c9cbadef4fa' in /srv/www/htdocs/naujienos/includes/cache.inc on line 109.
 user warning: Table './naujienos01/cache_filter' is marked as crashed and should be repaired query: SELECT data, created, headers, expire, serialized FROM cache_filter WHERE cid = '3:aac913d2b16c72edba5a7bfdc0f8a92e' in /srv/www/htdocs/naujienos/includes/cache.inc on line 26.
 user warning: Table './naujienos01/cache_filter' is marked as crashed and should be repaired query: UPDATE cache_filter SET data = '
Lietuvoje prasidėjo Saugesnio interneto savaitė. Jos metu organizuojami renginiai ir vykdoma šviečiamoji veikla, kuri atkreips jaunų bei suaugusių interneto vartotojų dėmesį į saugumą internetinėje erdvėje. Projektui pradėti pasirinkta Saugesnio interneto diena, kurią mini net 65 pasaulio šalys. Šių metų visoje Europoje švenčiamos dienos šūkis yra „Kurkime geresnį internetą kartu!“.
\n', created = 1569254805, expire = 1569341205, headers = '', serialized = 0 WHERE cid = '3:aac913d2b16c72edba5a7bfdc0f8a92e' in /srv/www/htdocs/naujienos/includes/cache.inc on line 109.
 user warning: Table './naujienos01/cache_filter' is marked as crashed and should be repaired query: SELECT data, created, headers, expire, serialized FROM cache_filter WHERE cid = '3:b93d54cf529d6c4aa3001a8f477a3c7f' in /srv/www/htdocs/naujienos/includes/cache.inc on line 26.
 user warning: Table './naujienos01/cache_filter' is marked as crashed and should be repaired query: UPDATE cache_filter SET data = '
IBM has partnered with a Lithuanian company to build a data center near Vilnius, the country\'s capital. AmberCore DC, the Lithuanian firm, and IBM said one of the goals of the project was to highlight advantages of the country as a data center location.
\n', created = 1569254805, expire = 1569341205, headers = '', serialized = 0 WHERE cid = '3:b93d54cf529d6c4aa3001a8f477a3c7f' in /srv/www/htdocs/naujienos/includes/cache.inc on line 109.
 user warning: Table './naujienos01/cache_filter' is marked as crashed and should be repaired query: SELECT data, created, headers, expire, serialized FROM cache_filter WHERE cid = '3:c41e8140b134908985d1e8e6c6ba7086' in /srv/www/htdocs/naujienos/includes/cache.inc on line 26.
 user warning: Table './naujienos01/cache_filter' is marked as crashed and should be repaired query: UPDATE cache_filter SET data = '
http://www.datacenterdynamics.com
\n', created = 1569254805, expire = 1569341205, headers = '', serialized = 0 WHERE cid = '3:c41e8140b134908985d1e8e6c6ba7086' in /srv/www/htdocs/naujienos/includes/cache.inc on line 109.
 user warning: Table './naujienos01/cache_filter' is marked as crashed and should be repaired query: SELECT data, created, headers, expire, serialized FROM cache_filter WHERE cid = '3:5f52269cb1af95e9b83cb3444f72c341' in /srv/www/htdocs/naujienos/includes/cache.inc on line 26.
 user warning: Table './naujienos01/cache_filter' is marked as crashed and should be repaired query: UPDATE cache_filter SET data = '
Espial, a leader in on-demand TV software and solutions, today announced that TEO LT — Lithuania\'s largest telco, IT, and TV services provider — has launched its next generation of on-demand video services using the Espial MediaBase content delivery platform. TEO provides the latest in Video-on-Demand and time-shift TV services to its IPTV subscribers across Lithuania.
\n', created = 1569254805, expire = 1569341205, headers = '', serialized = 0 WHERE cid = '3:5f52269cb1af95e9b83cb3444f72c341' in /srv/www/htdocs/naujienos/includes/cache.inc on line 109.
 user warning: Table './naujienos01/cache_filter' is marked as crashed and should be repaired query: SELECT data, created, headers, expire, serialized FROM cache_filter WHERE cid = '3:b83122a148c10f621d18036e9acd1916' in /srv/www/htdocs/naujienos/includes/cache.inc on line 26.
 user warning: Table './naujienos01/cache_filter' is marked as crashed and should be repaired query: UPDATE cache_filter SET data = '
www.espial.com
\n', created = 1569254805, expire = 1569341205, headers = '', serialized = 0 WHERE cid = '3:b83122a148c10f621d18036e9acd1916' in /srv/www/htdocs/naujienos/includes/cache.inc on line 109.
 user warning: Table './naujienos01/cache_filter' is marked as crashed and should be repaired query: SELECT data, created, headers, expire, serialized FROM cache_filter WHERE cid = '3:503d21d559842802efcdd5d2583f4ed0' in /srv/www/htdocs/naujienos/includes/cache.inc on line 26.
 user warning: Table './naujienos01/cache_filter' is marked as crashed and should be repaired query: UPDATE cache_filter SET data = '
Į internetą dedamas nusikalstamas skelbimas: galiu užpulti ką norit. Su šiuo ginklu įmanoma uždengti bet kurį puslapį. Tai gali būti elektroninės parduotuvės, bankai, akcijų birža, naujienų portalai, eismo tvarkaraščių svetainė, viešųjų pirkimų sistema, Seimo puslapis, elektros, vandentiekio, dujų stočių valdymo sistemos. Dėl kainos susitarsime.
\n', created = 1569254805, expire = 1569341205, headers = '', serialized = 0 WHERE cid = '3:503d21d559842802efcdd5d2583f4ed0' in /srv/www/htdocs/naujienos/includes/cache.inc on line 109.
 user warning: Table './naujienos01/cache_filter' is marked as crashed and should be repaired query: SELECT data, created, headers, expire, serialized FROM cache_filter WHERE cid = '3:81051bcc2cf1bedf378224b0a93e2877' in /srv/www/htdocs/naujienos/includes/cache.inc on line 26.
 user warning: Table './naujienos01/cache_filter' is marked as crashed and should be repaired query: UPDATE cache_filter SET data = '', created = 1569254805, expire = 1569341205, headers = '', serialized = 0 WHERE cid = '3:81051bcc2cf1bedf378224b0a93e2877' in /srv/www/htdocs/naujienos/includes/cache.inc on line 109.
 user warning: Table './naujienos01/cache_filter' is marked as crashed and should be repaired query: SELECT data, created, headers, expire, serialized FROM cache_filter WHERE cid = '3:905014c2c50dea8257de1b7242c1c372' in /srv/www/htdocs/naujienos/includes/cache.inc on line 26.
 user warning: Table './naujienos01/cache_filter' is marked as crashed and should be repaired query: UPDATE cache_filter SET data = '
Lithuanian company Duomenu Logistikos Centras plans to launch the Data Inn Tier-III data centre in Vilnius in April. The operator has installed the indirect Evaporative Cooler (IEC) system from Munters Oasis. The data centre will total 3,200 square metres and will be able to host over 18,000 servers. The contractor for the project is Sotela.
\n', created = 1569254805, expire = 1569341205, headers = '', serialized = 0 WHERE cid = '3:905014c2c50dea8257de1b7242c1c372' in /srv/www/htdocs/naujienos/includes/cache.inc on line 109.
 user warning: Table './naujienos01/cache_filter' is marked as crashed and should be repaired query: UPDATE cache_filter SET data = '
Mokslininkai sukūrė molekulinę ryšių sistemą, skirtą pranešimų ir duomenų perdavimui sudėtingose aplinkose, kuriose negali būti naudojamos elektromagnetinės bangos - pavyzdžiui, tuneliuose, vamzdynuose, po vandeniu ar gyvuose organizmuose.

\n', created = 1569254805, expire = 1569341205, headers = '', serialized = 0 WHERE cid = '3:ac7d7a16f0aa3e38f7aadcabd528056f' in /srv/www/htdocs/naujienos/includes/cache.inc on line 109.
 user warning: Table './naujienos01/cache_filter' is marked as crashed and should be repaired query: UPDATE cache_filter SET data = '

\n
Nariman Farsad, Weisi Guo, Andrew W. Eckford, Tabletop Molecular Communication: Text Messages through Chemical Signals, PLOS ONE, 2013, DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0082935
\n', created = 1569254805, expire = 1569341205, headers = '', serialized = 0 WHERE cid = '3:4c4536216e40c1cc501dbc83a06700b7' in /srv/www/htdocs/naujienos/includes/cache.inc on line 109.
 user warning: Table './naujienos01/cache_filter' is marked as crashed and should be repaired query: SELECT data, created, headers, expire, serialized FROM cache_filter WHERE cid = '3:c9824091b1fed692e6abb2048fd84172' in /srv/www/htdocs/naujienos/includes/cache.inc on line 26.
 user warning: Table './naujienos01/cache_filter' is marked as crashed and should be repaired query: UPDATE cache_filter SET data = '
Korporacija IBM paskelbė tradicinę prognozę, pavadintą „5 in 5“: kokios penkios technologijos labiausiai pakeis tai, kaip žmonės dirbs ir leis laisvalaikį per ateinančius 5 metus. Šiemet IBM prognozės remiasi idėja, kad ateina nauja kognityvinių sistemų karta, ir įvairiausi įrenginiai galės mokytis, analizuoti priežastis ir pasekmes bei bendrauti su žmonėmis vis natūralesniais būdais.
\n', created = 1569254805, expire = 1569341205, headers = '', serialized = 0 WHERE cid = '3:c9824091b1fed692e6abb2048fd84172' in /srv/www/htdocs/naujienos/includes/cache.inc on line 109.
 user warning: Table './naujienos01/cache_filter' is marked as crashed and should be repaired query: SELECT data, created, headers, expire, serialized FROM cache_filter WHERE cid = '3:957ff4bfe36ca975dbbd8c2717adb194' in /srv/www/htdocs/naujienos/includes/cache.inc on line 26.
 user warning: Table './naujienos01/cache_filter' is marked as crashed and should be repaired query: UPDATE cache_filter SET data = '
Vakar paskelbti geriausi lietuviški interneto turinio vaikams projektai. Keturiems jų autoriams įteikti kelialapiai atstovauti Lietuvai tarptautiniame konkurse „Europos apdovanojimas už geriausią interneto turinį vaikams“.
\n', created = 1569254805, expire = 1569341205, headers = '', serialized = 0 WHERE cid = '3:957ff4bfe36ca975dbbd8c2717adb194' in /srv/www/htdocs/naujienos/includes/cache.inc on line 109.
 user warning: Table './naujienos01/cache_filter' is marked as crashed and should be repaired query: SELECT data, created, headers, expire, serialized FROM cache_filter WHERE cid = '3:e5df4636944cee42e4766ed97d0c5df2' in /srv/www/htdocs/naujienos/includes/cache.inc on line 26.
 user warning: Table './naujienos01/cache_filter' is marked as crashed and should be repaired query: UPDATE cache_filter SET data = '
O tuo pačiu ir pasimokyti programuoti. Tai siūlo Boulderio universiteto (JAV) mokslininkai, teigiantys, kad jų sukurtais programavimo įrankiais bet kas gali sukurti trimatį video žaidimą, net visai neturint programavimo įgūdžių. Jie pavadinti „Hour of Code“ -  valanda, praleista programuojant.

\n', created = 1569254805, expire = 1569341205, headers = '', serialized = 0 WHERE cid = '3:e5df4636944cee42e4766ed97d0c5df2' in /srv/www/htdocs/naujienos/includes/cache.inc on line 109.
 user warning: Table './naujienos01/cache_filter' is marked as crashed and should be repaired query: UPDATE cache_filter SET data = '

\n', created = 1569254805, expire = 1569341205, headers = '', serialized = 0 WHERE cid = '3:d3772bfe13f45a6d159b3f3caa708d8a' in /srv/www/htdocs/naujienos/includes/cache.inc on line 109.
 user warning: Table './naujienos01/cache_filter' is marked as crashed and should be repaired query: UPDATE cache_filter SET data = '
mokslasplius.lt
\n', created = 1569254805, expire = 1569341205, headers = '', serialized = 0 WHERE cid = '3:9d464a75de7638794fc244f43967505a' in /srv/www/htdocs/naujienos/includes/cache.inc on line 109.
 2014.02.28 - 11:51
 Mobiliųjų programėlių lyderė Lietuvoje „Lemon Labs“ metė iššūkį „Google Maps“ žemėlapiais paremtoms programėlėms. Lietuvių kompanija kuria sprendimą „Beacon Lab“, kuris mobiliųjų vartotojų vietai nustatyti uždarose patalpose naudos pasaulyje sparčiai populiarėjančią technologiją „Beacon“ (liet. švyturys), kuri veikia „Bluetooth low energy“ („Bluetooth LE“) pagrindu.
 2014.02.11 - 11:20
 Lietuvoje prasidėjo Saugesnio interneto savaitė. Jos metu organizuojami renginiai ir vykdoma šviečiamoji veikla, kuri atkreips jaunų bei suaugusių interneto vartotojų dėmesį į saugumą internetinėje erdvėje. Projektui pradėti pasirinkta Saugesnio interneto diena, kurią mini net 65 pasaulio šalys. Šių metų visoje Europoje švenčiamos dienos šūkis yra „Kurkime geresnį internetą kartu!“.
 2014.01.10 - 15:29
 IBM has partnered with a Lithuanian company to build a data center near Vilnius, the country's capital. AmberCore DC, the Lithuanian firm, and IBM said one of the goals of the project was to highlight advantages of the country as a data center location.
 2014.01.07 - 17:43
 Espial, a leader in on-demand TV software and solutions, today announced that TEO LT — Lithuania's largest telco, IT, and TV services provider — has launched its next generation of on-demand video services using the Espial MediaBase content delivery platform. TEO provides the latest in Video-on-Demand and time-shift TV services to its IPTV subscribers across Lithuania.
 2014.01.05 - 12:25
 Data Inn Tier III data centre to launch in Vilnius
 2013.12.30 - 10:38
 Lithuanian company Duomenu Logistikos Centras plans to launch the Data Inn Tier-III data centre in Vilnius in April. The operator has installed the indirect Evaporative Cooler (IEC) system from Munters Oasis. The data centre will total 3,200 square metres and will be able to host over 18,000 servers. The contractor for the project is Sotela.
 IBM prognozės ateinantiems penkeriems metams: 5 technologijos, kurios labiausiai keis mūsų gyvenimus
 2013.12.19 - 15:12
 Korporacija IBM paskelbė tradicinę prognozę, pavadintą „5 in 5“: kokios penkios technologijos labiausiai pakeis tai, kaip žmonės dirbs ir leis laisvalaikį per ateinančius 5 metus. Šiemet IBM prognozės remiasi idėja, kad ateina nauja kognityvinių sistemų karta, ir įvairiausi įrenginiai galės mokytis, analizuoti priežastis ir pasekmes bei bendrauti su žmonėmis vis natūralesniais būdais.
 2013.12.18 - 01:00
 Vakar paskelbti geriausi lietuviški interneto turinio vaikams projektai. Keturiems jų autoriams įteikti kelialapiai atstovauti Lietuvai tarptautiniame konkurse „Europos apdovanojimas už geriausią interneto turinį vaikams“.
 Turite laisvą valandą? Tuomet verta ją išnaudoti prasmingai ir sukurti savo video žaidimą
 2013.12.16 - 22:01
 O tuo pačiu ir pasimokyti programuoti. Tai siūlo Boulderio universiteto (JAV) mokslininkai, teigiantys, kad jų sukurtais programavimo įrankiais bet kas gali sukurti trimatį video žaidimą, net visai neturint programavimo įgūdžių. Jie pavadinti „Hour of Code“ - valanda, praleista programuojant.