text:
Краево е село в Западна България. То се намира в Община Ботевград, Софийска област.
 География
 Село Краево се намира в планински район, на източния склон на Ржана планина, на 20 km от общинския център Ботевград и на 87 km от столицата София. Съседни села – Рашково и Радотина, и двете на 3 km разстояние. Разположено е между планинските склонове след сливането на Крива река и река Конщица в река Рударка.
 Селото е разделено на махали: Маринков рът, Минзивара, Хърта, Кривуля, Славо поле, Осикова поляна. Всички те са свързани с асфалтов път в добро състояние от републиканската мрежа. Наблизо се намира хижа Лескова.
 Население
 История
 На югозапад от селото се издига връх Градец, върху който са открити следи от предримската епоха до късната античност. До втората половина на XX век в района личат следи от галерии, от които в древността са добивани руди. Писмени източници споменават за съществуването на важен път от античната и средновековната епохи, който преминава през района на селището.
 Според предания селото носи името на един от синовете на местен феодал, който притежава владения в огромен район и преди смъртта си ги разделя на тримата си сина Радота, Рашота и Крайо. Етимолозите откриват славянски произход на имената им. Запазени писмени сведения за селището има след падането на България под османско владичество в данъчни регистри от средата на XV век. В тях то е споменато под името Крайово. Селото се числи към вилает Враца като е отбелязано в тимарските регистри с 4 домакинства и приход 559 акчета.
 След Освобождението е открито училище, което се помещава първоначално в частна къща, а по-късно в общинска сграда. Броят на жителите в края на XIX век възлиза на 370 души. Развива се производството и продажбата на дървен материал. Част от местното население работи по жп линията Варна – София. В средата на 1920-те години в Краево има две дъскорезници на вода и железарска работилница, която изработва кантари, тенекеджийски изделия и др.
 На 19 октомври 1927 г. по инициатива на учители и по-будни младежи в селото е основано читалище и наименовано „Христо Ботев“. Към него е открита библиотека с дарени близо 300 тома книги. Три десетилетия то се помещава в сградата на училището. От началото на 1930-те години има сведения за наличие на медни, железни и оловни руди в землището на селото, които не се експлоатират. Увеличаването близо два пъти броя на населението и замогването му създават възможност за откриване на нови работни места. За нуждите на селото и района са построени и работят 13 воденици, манифактурна работилница и колониал. Отворени са нови дюкяни и занаятчийски работилници. Далекосъобщителните връзки се осъществяват чрез функциониращ телефонен пост. Социално-икономическото замогване създава условия за строителна дейност. Издигнати са общински дом и църква. В новопостроената училищна сграда населението развива културно-просветна работа.
 През август 1945 г. е създадено женско дружество „Майчина грижа“. В 1955 г. краевци поемат инициатива за построяване на читалищна сграда. Населението масово се отзовава с безплатен труд и доставка на строителни материали. Съществена промяна в бита на краевци предизвиква електрификацията на селото, извършена през втората половина на 1940-те години. Стопанският облик на Краево през този период се характеризира с развитието на земеделието и скотовъдството. Сред отглежданите домашни животни са говеда, крави, свине, кози и приоритетно овци. Отредените посевни площи, възлизащи на повече от 1500 декара са засадени със зърнено-фуражни и зърнено-хлебни култури.
 Наред с увеличаването на селскостопанската продукция основни задачи са хигиенизирането и благоустрояването на селото. Започналият процес на промяна в аграрния характер на общината с промишлено-аграрен ускорява възникналата миграция. В Краево от близо 1000 жители през 1938 г. в селото остават 522 през 1957 г.
 Културни и природни забележителности
 Църква „Свети Цар Борис“ е разположена на центъра на селото.
 В близост до селото се намират останките на средновековната крепост „Градище“.
 На местността Маринков рът се намира паметник на загиналите през войните от селото.
 Редовни събития
 Всяка година се чества Св. Богородица на 15 август. Съборът на село Краево е на 7 октомври.
 Бележки
 Села в Софийска област
 Населени места в община Ботевград


type: wikipedia

text:
prof. Karol Walek (* 13. september 1878, Pécs, Maďarsko† 3. september 1952, Šopron) bol maďarský matematik a pedagóg.
 Život
 Narodil sa 13. septembra 1878 v Pécsi v Maďarsku. Bol absolventom banskoštiavnickej akadémie, ale baníckej odbornej činnosti sa venoval len krátko. Od r. 1902 prednášal na škole matematiku, spočiatku ako asistent, od r. 1908 vo funkcii adjunkta, od r. 1910 ako vedúci katedry matematiky. V r. 19041907 študoval matematiku na univerzite v Mníchove, tu získal doktorát dizertáciou o binárnych kubických transformáciách (1907). Na akadémii, neskôr Banskej a lesníckej vysokej škole, pôsobil aj po jej presťahovaní do Šoprone, až do r. 1952. Pred r. 1918 v oblasti matematiky publikoval len svoju doktorskú dizertáciu a prednášky, neskôr sa venoval aplikovanej matematike. Zomrel 3. septembra 1952 v Šoproni.
 Externé odkazy
 Osobnosti z Pécsu
 Maďarskí matematici
 Maďarskí pedagógovia
 Absolventi Baníckej a lesníckej akadémie v Banskej Štiavnici


type: caselaw

jurisdiction: EU

text:
 7.7.2012
 HU
 Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja
 C 200/5
 A Bíróság (ötödik tanács) 2012. május 24-i ítélete — Európai Bizottság kontra Belga Királyság
 (C-366/11. sz. ügy) (1)
 (Tagállami kötelezettségszegés - Környezet - 2000/60/EK irányelv - Az Unió vízügyi politikája - Vízgyűjtő kerületek gazdálkodására vonatkozó tervek - Közzététel és a Bizottság tájékoztatása - Hiány - A gazdálkodási terveket illetően a nyilvánosság tájékoztatása és a vele való konzultáció - Hiány)
 2012/C 200/08
 Az eljárás nyelve: francia
 Felek
 Felperes: Európai Bizottság (képviselők: I. Hadjiyiannis és A. Marghelis meghatalmazottak)
 Alperes: Belga Királyság (képviselők: T. Materne és J.-C. Halleux meghatalmazottak)
 Tárgy
 Tagállami kötelezettségszegés — A megszabott határidőn belül a vízpolitika terén a közösségi fellépés kereteinek meghatározásáról szóló, 2000. október 23-i 2000/60/EK európai parlamenti és tanácsi irányelvnek (HL L 327., 1. o.; magyar nyelvű különkiadás 15. fejezet, 5. kötet, 275. o.) való megfeleléshez szükséges rendelkezések elfogadásának elmulasztása — Az irányelv 13. cikkének (2), (3) és (6) bekezdése, valamint 15. cikkének (1) bekezdése szerinti vízgyűjtő kerületek gazdálkodására vonatkozó tervek kidolgozásának elmulasztása — Az említett terveket illetően a nyilvánosság tájékoztatására és a vele való konzultációra vonatkozó eljárás — Hiány
 Rendelkező rész
 1.
 A Belga Királyság — mivel az előírt határidőn belül nem dolgozta ki a mind a teljes mértékben a saját területén található vízgyűjtő kerületek, mind a nemzetközi vízgyűjtő kerületek gazdálkodására vonatkozó terveket, és az előírt határidőn belül nem továbbította a Bizottságnak ezek másolatát — nem teljesítette a vízpolitika terén a közösségi fellépés kereteinek meghatározásáról szóló, 2000. október 23-i 2000/60/EK európai parlamenti és tanácsi irányelv 13. cikkének (2), (3) és (6) bekezdéséből, valamint 15. cikkének (1) bekezdéséből eredő kötelezettségeit, és emellett — mivel az előírt határidőn belül nem kezdte meg a vízgyűjtő kerületek gazdálkodására vonatkozó terveket illetően a nyilvánosság tájékoztatására és a vele való konzultációra vonatkozó eljárást — nem teljesítette az említett irányelv 14. cikke (1) bekezdésének c) pontjából eredő kötelezettségeit.
 2.
 A Bíróság a Belga Királyságot kötelezi a költségek viselésére.
 (1) HL C 298., 2011.10.8.


text:
Az olajzöld asztrild (Amandava formosa) a madarak osztályának a verébalakúak (Passeriformes) rendjébe, ezen belül a díszpintyfélék (Estrildidae) családjába tartozó faj.
 Rendszerezés
 Sorolták a Fringilla nembe Fringilla formosa és az Estrilda nembe Estrilda formosa néven is.
 Előfordulása
 Ázsiában, India keleti és középső részén honos. Kóborlásai során eljut Pakisztánba is.
 Megjelenése
 Testhossza 10-11 centiméter.
 Források
 EUR-Lex - magyar neve
 További információk
 Képek az interneten a fajról
 Amandava
 Madárfajok
 India endemikus madarai


type: legislation

text:
 11.3.2016
 BG
 Официален вестник на Европейския съюз
 L 65/40
 РЕГЛАМЕНТ ЗА ИЗПЪЛНЕНИЕ (ЕС) 2016/346 НА КОМИСИЯТА
 от 10 март 2016 година
 за определяне на елементите, които да бъдат включени в Митническата информационна система
 ЕВРОПЕЙСКАТА КОМИСИЯ,
 като взе предвид Договора за функционирането на Европейския съюз,
 като взе предвид Регламент (ЕО) No 515/97 на Съвета от 13 март 1997 г. относно взаимопомощта между административните органи на държавите членки и сътрудничеството между последните и Комисията по гарантиране на правилното прилагане на законодателството в областта на митническите и земеделските въпроси (1), и по-специално член 25, параграф 1 от него,
 като има предвид, че:
 (1)
 Предназначението на Митническата информационна система (МИС) е да подпомага компетентните органи при предотвратяването, разследването и преследването на действия, нарушаващи митническото и земеделското законодателство. За постигането на тази цел компетентните органи на държавите членки въвеждат в МИС информация за съответните събития, например изземване или задържане на стоки. С цел МИС да продължи да удовлетворя нуждите на компетентните органи, е необходимо да се актуализира списъкът на елементите, които трябва да бъдат включени в МИС.
 (2)
 Всяко събитие, докладвано в МИС, включва редица основни елементи, които са необходими за адекватното тълкуване на случая. С цел да се даде възможност на компетентните органи лесно да установяват конкретни случаи или събития в МИС, трябва да е възможно в системата да се правят справки по случаите, за което е необходимо данните за конкретен случай да бъдат сред елементите, които се включват в МИС.
 (3)
 За извършването на измами обикновено е нужно активното участие на едно или повече лица. Правилното и недвусмислено установяване на самоличността на лицата, участващи в дейности, които са потенциално свързани с измами, е от първостепенно значение за успешното разследване на събитията. Данните, свързани с предприятията и лицата, участващи в измами или потенциално измамна дейност, следва да бъдат докладвани в МИС.
 (4)
 Поради факта, че начинът на действие на търговските измами, както и методът на укриване, зависят от вида транспорт, важно е в МИС да бъдат включени като задължителен елемент конкретните подробности, свързани с транспортните средства.
 (5)
 Транспортните схеми, които не са икономически оправдани, се считат за уместен показател за някои видове измами, например невярното деклариране на произход. Поради това е важно да се знаят подробностите за маршрутите, които се използват за превоз на стоки, тъй като те могат да се окажат важни за разкриването на измами. По тази причина информацията относно етапите от маршрутите се счита за особено важна за правилното разследване на митническите измами и следва да бъде включена сред елементите в МИС.
 (6)
 Митата и другите налози се различават в зависимост от конкретните свойства на стоката. Затова с цел да се осигури правилното проследяване на случаите или събитията, докладвани в МИС, спецификациите, отнасящи се до засегнатите в случая стоки, следва да бъдат въвеждани в МИС.
 (7)
 Анализите на конкретното изземване, конфискуване или задържане на стоките спомагат за разработването на превантивни мерки срещу повторната поява на същия вид митнически измами в бъдеще. Поради това се приема за важно в МИС да бъде включена уместна информация за изземването, конфискуването или задържането.
 (8)
 Всяко действие, предприето от съответните органи, следва да е оправдано и по тази причина следва да се основава на подходящи показатели за риска. Следователно е необходимо информацията за оценката на риска да бъде включена сред елементите в МИС.
 (9)
 В зависимост от съответния случай документите, отнасящи се до него, които трябва да бъдат приложени при вписването му в МИС, могат да се различават значително. Сред тях могат да са търговски документи, получени от компетентните органи, но не само такива документи.
 (10)
 Мерките, предвидени в настоящия регламент, са в съответствие със становището на комитета, създаден съгласно Регламент (ЕО) No 515/97,
 ПРИЕ НАСТОЯЩИЯ РЕГЛАМЕНТ:
 Член 1
 Елементи
 Елементите, които трябва да бъдат включени в базата данни на МИС за всяка от категориите, посочени в член 24 от Регламент (ЕО) No 515/97, са следните:
 а)
 Елементите, които са общи за всички категории по член 24 от Регламент (ЕО) No 515/97:
 —
 Данни за случая
 —
 Основна информация, отнасяща се до случая
 —
 Приложени документи от значение за случая
 б)
 Допълнителни елементи за категориите по член 24, буква а) от Регламент (ЕО) No 515/97:
 —
 Подробности за стоките
 —
 Документация
 —
 Информация относно изземването, задържането или конфискацията
 —
 Действия
 —
 Показатели за риска
 —
 Коментари
 в)
 Допълнителни елементи за категориите по член 24, буква б) от Регламент (ЕО) No 515/97:
 —
 Подробности за транспортните средства
 —
 Документация
 —
 Маршрути
 —
 Действия
 —
 Показатели за риска
 —
 Коментари
 г)
 Допълнителни елементи за категориите по член 24, буква в) от Регламент (ЕО) No 515/97:
 —
 Данни за участващи предприятия
 —
 Документация
 —
 Действия
 —
 Показатели за риска
 —
 Коментари
 д)
 Допълнителни елементи за категориите по член 24, буква г) от Регламент (ЕО) No 515/97:
 —
 Данни за участващи лица
 —
 Документация
 —
 Действия
 —
 Показатели за риска
 —
 Коментари
 е)
 Допълнителни елементи за категориите по член 24, буква д) от Регламент (ЕО) No 515/97:
 —
 Подробности за тенденциите в измамите
 —
 Показатели за риска
 ж)
 Допълнителни елементи за категориите по член 24, буква е) от Регламент (ЕО) No 515/97:
 —
 Подробности за наличността на експертни познания
 з)
 Допълнителни елементи за категориите по член 24, буква ж) от Регламент (ЕО) No 515/97:
 —
 Информация относно изземването, задържането или конфискацията
 —
 Действия
 —
 Показатели за риска
 и)
 Допълнителни елементи за категориите по член 24, буква з) от Регламент (ЕО) No 515/97:
 —
 Информация относно изземването, задържането или конфискацията
 —
 Действия
 —
 Показатели за риска
 Повече подробности във връзка с посочените по-горе елементи са представени в приложението към настоящия регламент.
 Член 2
 Отмяна
 Член 2 от Регламент (ЕО) No 696/98 на Комисията (2) се заличава.
 Член 3
 Влизане в сила
 Настоящият регламент влиза в сила на двадесетия ден след деня на публикуването му в Официален вестник на Европейския съюз.
 Той се прилага от 1 септември 2016 г.
 Настоящият регламент е задължителен в своята цялост и се прилага пряко във всички държави членки.
 Съставено в Брюксел на 10 март 2016 година.
 За Комисията
 Председател
 Jean-Claude JUNCKER
 (1) ОВ L 82, 22.3.1997 г., стр. 1.
 (2) Регламент (ЕО) No 696/98 на Комисията от 27 март 1998 година за прилагане на Регламент (ЕО) No 515/97 на Съвета относно взаимопомощта между административните органи на държавите-членки и сътрудничеството между последните и Комисията по гарантиране на правилното прилагане на законодателството в областта на митническите и земеделските въпроси (ОВ L 96, 28.3.1998 г., стр. 22).
 ПРИЛОЖЕНИЕ
 а)
 ДАННИ ЗА СЛУЧАЯ
 —
 Идентификационен номер на случая
 —
 Номер на документа
 —
 Национален референтен номер
 —
 Обобщение
 —
 Служба
 —
 Лице за контакт
 —
 Дата
 б)
 ОСНОВНА ИНФОРМАЦИЯ, ОТНАСЯЩА СЕ ДО СЛУЧАЯ
 —
 Вид измама
 —
 Вид отчет
 —
 Транспортни средства
 —
 Качество на информацията
 в)
 ДОКУМЕНТИ
 —
 Вид
 —
 Номер
 —
 Плащане на превоза
 —
 Дата на издаване
 —
 Място на издаване
 г)
 —
 ДАННИ ЗА УЧАСТВАЩИ ЛИЦА
 —
 Участие
 —
 Собствено име
 —
 Фамилно име
 —
 Моминско име
 —
 Други имена/псевдоними
 —
 Пол
 —
 Всякакви особени и постоянни физически характеристики;
 —
 Място на раждане
 —
 Дата на раждане
 —
 Гражданство
 —
 Адрес
 —
 Улица
 —
 Номер
 —
 Пощенска кутия
 —
 Пощенски код
 —
 Град
 —
 Държава
 —
 Стационарен/Мобилен телефон
 —
 Факс/Електронна поща
 —
 Документи за самоличност
 —
 Вид документ
 —
 Номер на документа
 —
 Дата на издаване
 —
 Място на издаване
 —
 Държава
 —
 Багаж
 —
 Категория
 —
 Вид
 —
 Марка
 —
 Номер на етикета
 —
 Обработка на багажа
 —
 Билети
 —
 Дата на закупуване
 —
 Начин на плащане
 —
 Издадени в (държава)
 —
 Издадени от
 —
 Начало на пътуването
 —
 Продължителност на престоя (дни)
 —
 Пари в брой
 —
 Декларирани
 —
 Предназначение
 —
 Произход
 —
 Парична единица
 —
 Вид пари в брой
 —
 Сума
 —
 Преобразувана сума (в евро)
 —
 Предупреждение
 д)
 ДАННИ ЗА УЧАСТВАЩИТЕ ПРЕДПРИЯТИЯ
 —
 Участие
 —
 Наименование
 —
 Търговско наименование
 —
 Вид регистрация
 —
 Регистрационен номер (1)
 —
 Адрес*
 —
 Улица
 —
 Номер
 —
 Пощенска кутия
 —
 Пощенски код
 —
 Град
 —
 Държава
 —
 Стационарен/Мобилен телефон
 —
 Факс/Електронна поща:
 е)
 ПОДРОБНОСТИ ЗА ТРАНСПОРТНИТЕ СРЕДСТВА
 6.1.
 КОНТЕЙНЕР
 —
 Вид
 —
 Номер
 —
 Статус
 —
 Номер на печатите
 —
 Големина
 ж)
 6.2.
 ПЪТЕН ПРЕВОЗ
 —
 Вид
 —
 Вид регистрация
 —
 Държава на регистрация
 —
 Марка
 —
 Табела с регистрационния номер на превозното средство
 —
 Цвят
 —
 Отпечатани наименования или лого
 —
 Номер на печатите
 з)
 6.3.
 МАЛЪК ПЛАВАТЕЛЕН СЪД
 —
 Вид
 —
 Наименование
 —
 Флаг
 —
 Пристанище на регистрация
 —
 Дължина
 —
 Единица за дължина
 —
 Брутен тонаж съгласно Международната конвенция за тонажно измерване на корабите
 —
 Цвят
 —
 Вид регистрация на плавателния съд
 —
 Регистрационен номер на плавателния съд
 и)
 6.4.
 ТЪРГОВСКИ ПЛАВАТЕЛЕН СЪД
 —
 Вид
 —
 Наименование
 —
 Флаг
 —
 Вид регистрация на плавателния съд
 —
 Регистрационен номер на плавателния съд
 й)
 6.5.
 ЖЕЛЕЗОПЪТЕН ПРЕВОЗ
 —
 Вид
 —
 Номер на влака
 —
 Дружество
 —
 Държава на регистрация
 —
 Номер на вагона
 —
 Номер на печатите
 к)
 6.6.
 ВЪЗДУШЕН ПРЕВОЗ
 —
 Вид
 —
 Номер на полета
 —
 Вид транспорт
 —
 Авиокомпания
 —
 Регистрационен номер
 —
 Превозвач
 —
 Регистрационен номер на превозвача
 —
 Основен референтен номер (MRN)
 —
 Товаро-разтоварна обработка
 —
 Номер на печатите
 6.7.
 ПОЩЕНСКИ ПРАТКИ
 —
 Вид
 —
 Номер на полета
 —
 Превозвач
 —
 Регистрационен номер на превозвача
 —
 Основен референтен номер (MRN)
 л)
 МАРШРУТ
 —
 Етап
 —
 Дата
 —
 Държава
 —
 Място
 —
 Вид местонахождение
 —
 Географска ширина
 —
 Географска дължина
 —
 Транспортни средства
 м)
 ПОДРОБНОСТИ ЗА СТОКИТЕ
 —
 Статус на стоката
 —
 Вид стока
 —
 Описание
 —
 Категория
 —
 Код по ХС/КН/Тарик (6, 8, 10 цифри)
 —
 Митнически режим
 —
 Общо фактурирана сума
 —
 Парична единица
 —
 Преобразувана сума (в евро)
 —
 Марка
 —
 Производител
 —
 Количество
 —
 Единица
 —
 Брутно тегло
 —
 Обем
 —
 Нетно тегло
 —
 (нанесени) Етикети/Предупреждения
 —
 Внимание
 8.1.
 ДОПЪЛНИТЕЛНИ ПОЛЕТА ЗА ТЮТЮНЕВИ ИЗДЕЛИЯ
 —
 Вид продукт
 8.2.
 ДОПЪЛНИТЕЛНИ ПОЛЕТА ЗА ПРЕКУРСУРИ НА НАРКОТИЧНИ ВЕЩЕСТВА
 —
 Вид лекарство
 —
 Количество
 —
 Единица
 —
 Лого
 8.3.
 ДОПЪЛНИТЕЛНИ ПОЛЕТА ЗА ПАРИ В БРОЙ
 —
 Предназначение
 —
 Произход
 —
 Сума
 —
 Видове пари в брой
 —
 Количество
 н)
 ИНФОРМАЦИЯ ОТНОСНО ИЗЗЕМВАНЕТО, ЗАДЪРЖАНЕТО ИЛИ КОНФИСКАЦИЯТА
 —
 Статус
 —
 Дата
 —
 Държава
 —
 Вид местонахождение
 —
 Място на изземването
 —
 Географска ширина
 —
 Географска дължина
 —
 Начин на действие
 —
 Вид укриване
 —
 Подробности за укриването
 —
 Служба
 о)
 ДЕЙСТВИЕ
 —
 Поискано действие
 —
 Основания за действието
 —
 Предполагаем начин на действие
 —
 Предполагаем вид укриване
 —
 Предприето действие
 —
 Дата
 п)
 ПОКАЗАТЕЛИ ЗА РИСКА
 р)
 КОМЕНТАРИ
 —
 Коментар
 с)
 ПРИЛОЖЕНИ ДОКУМЕНТИ ОТ ЗНАЧЕНИЕ ЗА СЛУЧАЯ
 —
 Справка
 т)
 ПОДРОБНОСТИ ЗА ТЕНДЕНЦИИТЕ В ИЗМАМИТЕ
 у)
 ПОДРОБНОСТИ ЗА НАЛИЧИЕТО НА ЕКСПЕРТЕН ОПИТ
 (1) Тази позиция не се попълва, ако по този начин е възможно да се установи самоличността на физическо лице.


text:
 22.9.2012
 CS
 Úřední věstník Evropské unie
 C 287/14
 Rozsudek Soudního dvora (druhého senátu) ze dne 12. července 2012 (žádost o rozhodnutí o předběžné otázce Varhoven administrativen sad — Bulharsko) — EMS-Bulgaria Transport OOD v. Direktor na Direkcija „Obžalvane i upravlenie na izpalnenieto“ Plovdiv
 (Věc C-284/11) (1)
 (DPH - Směrnice 2006/112/ES - Nárok na odpočet - Prekluzívní lhůta pro uplatnění nároku na odpočet DPH - Zásada efektivity - Odepření nároku na odpočet DPH - Zásada daňové neutrality)
 2012/C 287/24
 Jednací jazyk: bulharština
 Předkládající soud
 Varhoven administrativen sad
 Účastníci původního řízení
 Žalobkyně a navrhovatelka v řízení o kasačním opravném prostředku: EMS-Bulgaria Transport OOD
 Žalovaný a odpůrce v řízení o kasačním opravném prostředku: Direktor na Direkcija „Obžalvane i upravlenie na izpalnenieto“ Plovdiv
 Předmět věci
 Žádost o rozhodnutí o předběžné otázce — Varhoven administrativen sad — Výklad článků 179, 180 a 273 Směrnice Rady 2006/112/ES ze dne 28. listopadu 2006 o společném systému daně z přidané hodnoty (Úř. věst. L 347, s. 1) a zásady efektivity podle rozsudku Soudního dvora ve spojených věcech C-95/07 a C-96/07, Ecotrade a další — Nárok na odpočet DPH odvedené na vstupu — Vnitrostátní právní úprava podřizující uplatnění nároku na odpočet DPH prekluzivní lhůtě v délce tří zdaňovacích období následujících po období, ve kterém nárok na odpočet vznikl — Odepření nároku na odpočet DPH z důvodu nesplnění povinnosti dobrovolné registrace k DPH jakožto pořizovatele zboží uvnitř Společenství a neuplatnění nároku na odpočet ve stanovených lhůtách
 Výrok
 1)
 Článek 179 odst. 1 a články 180 a 273 směrnice Rady 2006/112/ES ze dne 28. listopadu 2006 o společném systému daně z přidané hodnoty musejí být vykládány v tom smyslu, že nebrání existenci takové prekluzivní lhůty omezující uplatnění nároku na odpočet, jako je lhůta dotčená v původním řízení, za předpokladu, že v praxi neznemožňuje nebo nadměrně neztěžuje uplatnění tohoto nároku. Takové posouzení přísluší předkládajícímu soudu, který může vzít v úvahu zejména později provedené následné prodloužení prekluzivní lhůty, jakož i délku registračního řízení pro účely daně z přidané hodnoty, které se musí uskutečnit ve stejné lhůtě, aby bylo možné uplatnit uvedený nárok na odpočet.
 2)
 Zásada daňové neutrality brání sankci spočívající v odepření nároku na odpočet v případě opožděného odvedení daně z přidané hodnoty, ale nebrání výběru úroků z prodlení, s výhradou toho, že tato sankce dodrží zásadu proporcionality, ověření čehož přísluší předkládajícímu soudu.
 (1) Úř. věst. C 238, 13.8.2011.


text:
 Events
 Pre-1600
 1056 – After a sudden illness a few days previously, Byzantine Empress Theodora dies childless, thus ending the Macedonian dynasty.
 1057 – Abdication of Byzantine Emperor Michael VI Bringas after just one year.
 1218 – Al-Kamil becomes sultan of the Ayyubid dynasty.
 1314 – King Haakon V of Norway moves the capital from Bergen to Oslo.
 1422 – King Henry V of England dies of dysentery while in France. His son, Henry VI becomes King of England at the age of nine months.
 1535 – Pope Paul III excommunicates English King Henry VIII from the church. He drew up a papal bull of excommunication which began Eius qui immobilis.
 1601–1900
 1776 – William Livingston, the first Governor of New Jersey, begins serving his first term.
 1795 – War of the First Coalition: The British capture Trincomalee (present-day Sri Lanka) from the Dutch in order to keep it out of French hands.
 1798 – Irish Rebellion: Irish rebels, with French assistance, establish the short-lived Republic of Connacht.
 1813 – Peninsular War: Spanish troops repel a French attack in the Battle of San Marcial.
 1864 – During the American Civil War, Union forces led by General William T. Sherman launch an assault on Atlanta.
 1876 – Ottoman Sultan Murad V is deposed and succeeded by his brother Abdul Hamid II.
 1886 – The 7.0 Charleston earthquake affects southeastern South Carolina with a maximum Mercalli intensity of X (Extreme). Sixty people killed with damage estimated at $5–6 million.
 1888 – Mary Ann Nichols is murdered. She is the first of Jack the Ripper's confirmed victims.
 1895 – German Count Ferdinand von Zeppelin patents his navigable balloon.
 1901–present
 1907 – Russia and the United Kingdom sign the Anglo-Russian Convention, by which the UK recognizes Russian preeminence in northern Persia, while Russia recognizes British preeminence in southeastern Persia and Afghanistan. Both powers pledge not to interfere in Tibet.
 1918 – World War I: Start of the Battle of Mont Saint-Quentin, a successful assault by the Australian Corps during the Hundred Days Offensive.
 1920 – Polish–Soviet War: A decisive Polish victory in the Battle of Komarów.
 1933 – The Integral Nationalist Group wins the 1933 Andorran parliamentary election, the first election in Andorra held with universal male suffrage.
 1935 – In an attempt to stay out of the growing tensions concerning Germany and Japan, the United States passes the first of its Neutrality Acts.
 1936 – Radio Prague, now the official international broadcasting station of the Czech Republic, goes on the air.
 1939 – Nazi Germany mounts a false flag attack on the Gleiwitz radio station, creating an excuse to attack Poland the following day, thus starting World War II in Europe.
 1940 – Pennsylvania Central Airlines Trip 19 crashes near Lovettsville, Virginia. The CAB investigation of the accident is the first investigation to be conducted under the Bureau of Air Commerce act of 1938.
 1941 – World War II: Serbian paramilitary forces defeat Germans in the Battle of Loznica.
 1943 – , the first U.S. Navy ship to be named after a black person, is commissioned.
 1949 – The retreat of the Democratic Army of Greece into Albania after its defeat on Gramos mountain marks the end of the Greek Civil War.
 1950 – TWA Flight 903 crashes near Itay El Barud, Egypt, killing all 55 aboard.
 1957 – The Federation of Malaya (now Malaysia) gains its independence from the United Kingdom.
 1959 – A parcel bomb sent by Ngô Đình Nhu, younger brother and chief adviser of South Vietnamese President Ngô Đình Diệm, fails to kill King Norodom Sihanouk of Cambodia.
 1962 – Trinidad and Tobago becomes independent.
 1963 – Crown Colony of North Borneo (now Sabah) achieves self governance.
 1972 – Aeroflot Flight 558 crashes in the Abzelilovsky District in Bashkortostan, Russia (then the Soviet Union), killing all 102 people aboard.
 1986 – Aeroméxico Flight 498 collides with a Piper PA-28 Cherokee over Cerritos, California, killing 67 in the air and 15 on the ground.
 1986 – The Soviet passenger liner sinks in the Black Sea after colliding with the bulk carrier Pyotr Vasev, killing 423.
 1987 – Thai Airways Flight 365 crashes into the ocean near Ko Phuket, Thailand, killing all 83 aboard.
 1988 – Delta Air Lines Flight 1141 crashes during takeoff from Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport, killing 14.
 1988 – CAAC Flight 301 overshoots the runway at Kai Tak Airport and crashes into Kowloon Bay, killing seven people.
 1991 – Kyrgyzstan declares its independence from the Soviet Union.
 1993 – Russia completes removing its troops from Lithuania.
 1994 – Russia completes removing its troops from Estonia.
 1996 – Saddam Hussein's troops seized Irbil after the Kurdish Masoud Barzani appealed for help to defeat his Kurdish rival PUK.
 1997 – Diana, Princess of Wales, her partner Dodi Fayed and driver Henri Paul die in a car crash in Paris.
 1999 – The first of a series of bombings in Moscow kills one person and wounds 40 others.
 1999 – A LAPA Boeing 737-200 crashes during takeoff from Jorge Newbury Airport in Buenos Aires, killing 65, including two on the ground.
 2002 – Typhoon Rusa, the most powerful typhoon to hit South Korea in 43 years, made landfall, killing at least 236 people.
 2005 – The 2005 Al-Aaimmah bridge stampede in Baghdad kills 953 people.
 2006 – Edvard Munch's famous painting The Scream, stolen on August 22, 2004, is recovered in a raid by Norwegian police.
 2016 – Brazil's President Dilma Rousseff is impeached and removed from office.
 2019 – A sightseeing helicopter crashes in the mountains of , Alta, Norway, killing all 6 occupants.
 Births
 Pre-1600
 12 – Caligula, Roman emperor (d. 41)
 161 – Commodus, Roman emperor (d. 192)
 1018 – Jeongjong II, Korean ruler (d. 1046)
 1168 – Zhang Zong, Chinese emperor (d. 1208)
 1542 – Isabella de' Medici, Italian princess (d. 1576)
 1569 – Jahangir, Mughal emperor (d. 1627)
 1601–1900
 1652 – Ferdinando Carlo Gonzaga, Italian nobleman (d. 1708)
 1663 – Guillaume Amontons, French physicist and instrument maker (d. 1705)
 1721 – George Hervey, 2nd Earl of Bristol, English soldier and politician, Lord Lieutenant of Ireland (d. 1775)
 1741 – Jean-Paul-Égide Martini, French composer and educator (d. 1816)
 1748 – Jean-Étienne Despréaux, French ballet dancer, choreographer, composer, and playwright (d. 1820)
 1767 – Henry Joy McCracken, Irish businessman and activist, founded the Society of United Irishmen (d. 1798)
 1775 – Agnes Bulmer, English poet and author (d. 1836)
 1797 – Stephen Geary, English architect, inventor and entrepreneur (d. 1854)
 1802 – Husein Gradaščević, Ottoman general (d. 1834)
 1821 – Hermann von Helmholtz, German physician and physicist (d. 1894)
 1823 – Galusha A. Grow, American lawyer and politician, 28th Speaker of the United States House of Representatives (d. 1907)
 1834 – Amilcare Ponchielli, Italian composer and educator (d. 1886)
 1842 – Josephine St. Pierre Ruffin, American journalist, publisher, and activist (d. 1924)
 1843 – Georg von Hertling, German academic and politician, 7th Chancellor of the German Empire (d. 1919)
 1870 – Maria Montessori, Italian physician and educator (d. 1952)
 1871 – James E. Ferguson, American banker and politician, 26th Governor of Texas (d. 1944)
 1878 – Frank Jarvis, American sprinter and lawyer (d. 1933)
 1879 – Alma Mahler, Austrian-American composer and author (d. 1964)
 1879 – Taishō, emperor of Japan (d. 1926)
 1880 – Wilhelmina, queen of the Netherlands (d. 1962)
 1884 – George Sarton, Belgian-American historian of science (d. 1956)
 1885 – DuBose Heyward, American author and playwright (d. 1940)
 1890 – August Alle, Estonian poet and author (d. 1952)
 1890 – Nätti-Jussi, Finnish lumberjack and forest laborer (d. 1964)
 1893 – Lily Laskine, French harp player (d. 1988)
 1894 – Albert Facey, Australian soldier and author (d. 1982)
 1896 – Brian Edmund Baker, English Air Marshal (d. 1979)
 1896 – Félix-Antoine Savard, Canadian priest and author (d. 1982)
 1897 – Fredric March, American actor (d. 1975)
 1900 – Gino Lucetti, Italian anarchist, attempted assassin of Benito Mussolini (d. 1943)
 1901–present
 1902 – Géza Révész, Hungarian general and politician, Hungarian Minister of Defence (d. 1977)
 1903 – Arthur Godfrey, American radio and television host (d. 1983)
 1903 – Vladimir Jankélévitch, French musicologist and philosopher (d. 1985)
 1905 – Robert Bacher, American physicist and academic (d. 2004)
 1905 – Sanford Meisner, American actor and educator (d. 1997)
 1907 – Valter Biiber, Estonian footballer (d. 1977)
 1907 – Augustus F. Hawkins, American lawyer and politician (d. 2007)
 1907 – Ramon Magsaysay, Filipino captain, engineer, and politician, 7th President of the Philippines (d. 1957)
 1907 – William Shawn, American journalist (d. 1992)
 1907 – Altiero Spinelli, Italian theorist and politician (d. 1986)
 1908 – William Saroyan, American novelist, playwright, and short story writer (d. 1981)
 1909 – Ferenc Fejtő, Hungarian-French journalist and political scientist (d. 2008)
 1911 – Edward Brongersma, Dutch journalist and politician (d. 1998)
 1911 – Arsenio Rodríguez, Cuban-American tres player, composer, and bandleader (d. 1970)
 1913 – Helen Levitt, American photographer and cinematographer (d. 2009)
 1913 – Bernard Lovell, English physicist and astronomer (d. 2012)
 1914 – Richard Basehart, American actor (d. 1984)
 1915 – Pete Newell, American basketball player and coach (d. 2008)
 1916 – Danny Litwhiler, American baseball player and coach (d. 2011)
 1916 – Daniel Schorr, American journalist and author (d. 2010)
 1916 – John S. Wold, American geologist and politician (d. 2017)
 1918 – Alan Jay Lerner, American songwriter and composer (d. 1986)
 1919 – Amrita Pritam, Indian poet and author (d. 2005)
 1921 – Otis G. Pike, American judge and politician (d. 2014)
 1921 – Raymond Williams, Welsh author and academic (d. 1988)
 1924 – John Davidson, American physician and politician (d. 2012)
 1924 – Buddy Hackett, American actor and singer (d. 2003)
 1924 – Herbert Wise, Austrian-English director and producer (d. 2015)
 1925 – Moran Campbell, English-Canadian physician and academic, invented the venturi mask (d. 2004)
 1925 – Maurice Pialat, French actor and director (d. 2003)
 1928 – James Coburn, American actor (d. 2002)
 1928 – Jaime Sin, Filipino cardinal (d. 2005)
 1930 – Big Tiny Little, American pianist (d. 2010)
 1931 – Jean Béliveau, Canadian ice hockey player (d. 2014)
 1931 – Noble Willingham, American actor (d. 2004)
 1932 – Allan Fotheringham, Canadian journalist (d. 2020)
 1932 – Roy Castle, English dancer, singer, comedian, actor, television presenter and musician (d. 1994)
 1935 – Eldridge Cleaver, American activist and author (d. 1998)
 1935 – Bryan Organ, English painter
 1935 – Frank Robinson, American baseball player and manager (d. 2019)
 1936 – Vladimir Orlov, Russian journalist and author (d. 2014)
 1937 – Warren Berlinger, American actor
 1937 – Bobby Parker, American singer-songwriter and guitarist (d. 2013)
 1938 – Martin Bell, English journalist and politician
 1939 – Jerry Allison, American drummer and songwriter (d. 2022)
 1940 – Robbie Basho, American guitarist, pianist, and composer (d. 1986)
 1940 – Wilton Felder, American saxophonist and bass player (d. 2015)
 1940 – Larry Hankin, American actor, director, and producer
 1940 – Roger Newman, English-American actor and screenwriter (d. 2010)
 1940 – Jack Thompson, Australian actor
 1941 – William DeWitt, Jr., American businessman
 1941 – Emmanuel Nunes, Portuguese-French composer and educator (d. 2012)
 1942 – Isao Aoki, Japanese golfer
 1943 – Leonid Ivashov, Russian general
 1944 – Roger Dean, English illustrator and publisher
 1944 – Liz Forgan, English journalist
 1944 – Christine King, English historian and academic
 1944 – Clive Lloyd, Guyanese cricketer
 1945 – Van Morrison, Northern Irish singer-songwriter
 1945 – Itzhak Perlman, Israeli-American violinist and conductor
 1945 – Bob Welch, American singer and guitarist (d. 2012)
 1946 – Ann Coffey, Scottish social worker and politician
 1946 – Jerome Corsi, American conspiracy theorist and author
 1946 – Tom Coughlin, American football player and coach
 1947 – Luca Cordero di Montezemolo, Italian businessman
 1947 – Yumiko Ōshima, Japanese author and illustrator
 1947 – Somchai Wongsawat, Thai lawyer and politician, 26th Prime Minister of Thailand
 1948 – Harald Ertl, Austrian race car driver and journalist (d. 1982)
 1948 – Lowell Ganz, American screenwriter and producer
 1948 – Ken McMullen, English director, producer, and screenwriter
 1948 – Holger Osieck, German footballer and manager
 1948 – Rudolf Schenker, German guitarist and songwriter
 1949 – Richard Gere, American actor and producer
 1949 – Hugh David Politzer, American physicist and academic, Nobel Prize laureate
 1949 – Rick Roberts, American country-rock singer-songwriter and guitarist
 1951 – Grant Batty, New Zealand rugby player
 1951 – Sirje Tamul, Estonian historian, author, and academic
 1952 – Kim Kashkashian, American viola player and educator
 1952 – Herbert Reul, German politician
 1953 – Miguel Ángel Guerra, Argentinian race car driver
 1953 – György Károly, Hungarian poet and author (d. 2018)
 1953 – Pavel Vinogradov, Russian astronaut and engineer
 1954 – Julie Brown, American actress and screenwriter
 1955 – Aleksander Krupa, Polish-American actor
 1955 – Julie Maxton, Scottish lawyer and academic
 1955 – Edwin Moses, American hurdler
 1955 – Anthony Thistlethwaite, English saxophonist and bass player
 1955 – Gary Webb, American journalist and author (d. 2004)
 1956 – Mária Balážová, Slovak painter and illustrator
 1956 – Masashi Tashiro, Japanese singer, actor, and director
 1956 – Tsai Ing-wen, Taiwanese politician and the President of the Republic of China
 1957 – Colm O'Rourke, Irish footballer and sportscaster
 1957 – Gina Schock, American drummer
 1957 – Glenn Tilbrook, English singer-songwriter and guitarist
 1958 – Serge Blanco, Venezuelan-French rugby player and businessman
 1958 – Stephen Cottrell, English bishop
 1959 – Ralph Krueger, Canadian ice hockey player and coach
 1959 – Jessica Upshaw, American lawyer and politician (d. 2013)
 1960 – Vali Ionescu, Romanian long jumper
 1960 – Chris Whitley, American singer-songwriter and guitarist (d. 2005)
 1960 – Hassan Nasrallah, Lebanese politician, 3rd Secretary-General of Hezbollah
 1961 – Kieran Crowley, New Zealand rugby player
 1961 – Magnus Ilmjärv, Estonian historian and author
 1962 – Dee Bradley Baker, American voice actor
 1963 – Reb Beach, American guitarist
 1963 – Rituparno Ghosh, Indian actor, director, and screenwriter (d. 2013)
 1963 – Sonny Silooy, Dutch footballer and manager
 1964 – Raymond P. Hammond, American poet and critic
 1965 – Zsolt Borkai, Hungarian gymnast and politician
 1965 – Susan Gritton, English soprano and actress
 1966 – Lyuboslav Penev, Bulgarian footballer and manager
 1967 – Gene Hoglan, American drummer
 1967 – Anita Moen, Norwegian skier
 1968 – Valdon Dowiyogo, Nauruan politician (d. 2016)
 1968 – Hideo Nomo, Japanese-American baseball player
 1968 – Jolene Watanabe, American tennis player (d. 2019)
 1969 – Nathalie Bouvier, French skier
 1969 – Jonathan LaPaglia, Australian actor and physician
 1969 – Javagal Srinath, Indian cricketer and referee
 1970 – Debbie Gibson, American singer-songwriter, producer, and actress
 1970 – Nikola Gruevski, Macedonian economist and politician, 6th Prime Minister of the Republic of Macedonia
 1970 – Greg Mulholland, English politician
 1970 – Queen Rania of Jordan
 1970 – Arie van Lent, Dutch-German footballer and manager
 1970 – Zack Ward, Canadian actor and producer
 1971 – Kirstie Allsopp, British TV presenter
 1971 – Pádraig Harrington, Irish golfer
 1971 – Vadim Repin, Belgian-Russian violinist
 1971 – Chris Tucker, American comedian and actor
 1973 – Scott Niedermayer, Canadian ice hockey player and coach
 1974 – Andriy Medvedev, Ukrainian-Monégasque tennis player
 1975 – Craig Cumming, New Zealand cricketer and sportscaster
 1975 – John Grahame, American ice hockey player and coach
 1975 – Sara Ramirez, Mexican musician
 1976 – Vincent Delerm, French singer-songwriter and pianist
 1976 – Roque Júnior, Brazilian footballer and manager
 1976 – Radek Martínek, Czech ice hockey player
 1977 – Jeff Hardy, American wrestler and singer
 1977 – Ian Harte, Irish footballer
 1977 – Craig Nicholls, Australian singer-songwriter and guitarist
 1977 – Arzu Yanardağ, Turkish actress and model
 1978 – Philippe Christanval, French footballer
 1978 – Ido Pariente, Israeli mixed martial artist and trainer
 1978 – Craig Stapleton, Australian rugby league player
 1978 – Sandis Valters, Latvian basketball player
 1978 – Morten Qvenild, Norwegian pianist and composer
 1979 – Clay Hensley, American baseball player
 1979 – Mark Johnston, Canadian swimmer
 1979 – Simon Neil, Scottish singer-songwriter, guitarist, and producer
 1979 – Yuvan Shankar Raja, Indian Tamil singer-songwriter and producer
 1979 – Ramón Santiago, Dominican baseball player
 1979 – Mickie James, American wrestler
 1980 – Joe Budden, American rapper
 1981 – Ahmad Al Harthy, Omani race car driver
 1981 – Dwayne Peel, Welsh rugby player
 1981 – Steve Saviano, American ice hockey player
 1982 – Ian Crocker, American swimmer
 1982 – Chris Duhon, American basketball player
 1982 – Lien Huyghebaert, Belgian sprinter
 1982 – Christopher Katongo, Zambian footballer
 1982 – Josh Kroeger, American baseball player
 1982 – Alexei Mikhnov, Ukrainian-Russian ice hockey player
 1982 – Pepe Reina, Spanish footballer
 1982 – Michele Rugolo, Italian race car driver
 1982 – G. Willow Wilson, American journalist and author
 1983 – Deniz Aydoğdu, German-Turkish footballer
 1983 – Milan Biševac, Serbian footballer
 1983 – Larry Fitzgerald, American football player
 1984 – Matti Breschel, Danish cyclist
 1984 – Ryan Kesler, American ice hockey player
 1984 – Ted Ligety, American skier
 1984 – Charl Schwartzel, South African golfer
 1985 – Rolando, Portuguese footballer
 1985 – Andrew Foster, Australian footballer
 1985 – Mabel Matiz, Turkish singer
 1985 – Mohammed bin Salman, Crown Prince of Saudi Arabia
 1987 – Xavi Annunziata, Spanish footballer
 1987 – Petros Kravaritis, Greek footballer
 1987 – Ondřej Pavelec, Czech ice hockey player
 1988 – Trent Hodkinson, Australian rugby league player
 1988 – David Ospina, Colombian footballer
 1988 – Ember Moon, Professional Wrestler
 1989 – Dezmon Briscoe, American football player
 1990 – Tadeja Majerič, Slovenian tennis player
 1991 – António Félix da Costa, Portuguese race car driver
 1991 – Cédric Soares, Portuguese footballer
 1992 – Holly Earl, British actress
 1992 – Tyler Randell, Australian rugby league player
 1993 – Pablo Marí, Spanish football player
 1993 – Ilnur Alshin, Russian football player
 1993 – Anna Karnaukh, Russian water polo player
 1994 – Alex Harris, Scottish footballer
 1994 – Can Aktav, Turkish football player
 2001 – Amanda Anisimova, American tennis player
 Deaths
 Pre-1600
 318 – Liu Cong, emperor of the Xiongnu state
 577 – John Scholasticus, Byzantine patriarch and saint
 651 – Aidan of Lindisfarne, Irish bishop and saint
 731 – Ōtomo no Tabito, Japanese poet (b. 665)
 894 – Ahmad ibn Muhammad al-Ta'i, Muslim governor
 1054 – Kunigunde of Altdorf, Frankish noblewoman (b. c. 1020)
 1056 – Theodora, Empress of the Eastern Roman Empire (b. 981)
 1158 – Sancho III of Castile (b. 1134)
 1234 – Emperor Go-Horikawa of Japan (b. 1212)
 1287 – Konrad von Würzburg, German poet
 1324 – Henry II of Jerusalem (b. 1271)
 1372 – Ralph de Stafford, 1st Earl of Stafford, English soldier (b. 1301)
 1422 – Henry V of England (b. 1386)
 1450 – Isabella of Navarre, Countess of Armagnac (b. 1395)
 1502 – Thomas Wode, Lord Chief Justice of the Common Pleas
 1528 – Matthias Grünewald, German artist (b. 1470)
 1601–1900
 1645 – Francesco Bracciolini, Italian poet (b. 1566)
 1654 – Ole Worm, Danish physician and historian (b. 1588)
 1688 – John Bunyan, English preacher, theologian, and author (b. 1628)
 1730 – Gottfried Finger, Czech-German viol player and composer (b. 1660)
 1741 – Johann Gottlieb Heineccius, German academic and jurist (b. 1681)
 1772 – William Borlase, English geologist and historian (b. 1695)
 1795 – François-André Danican Philidor, French-English chess player and composer (b. 1726)
 1799 – Nicolas-Henri Jardin, French architect and academic, designed the Bernstorff Palace and Marienlyst Castle (b. 1720)
 1811 – Louis Antoine de Bougainville, French admiral and explorer (b. 1729)
 1814 – Arthur Phillip, English admiral and politician, 1st Governor of New South Wales (b. 1738)
 1817 – Sir John Duckworth, 1st Baronet, English admiral and politician, 39th Commodore Governor of Newfoundland (b. 1747)
 1818 – Robert Calder, Scottish admiral (b. 1745)
 1858 – Chief Oshkosh, Menominee chief (b. 1795)
 1867 – Charles Baudelaire, French poet and critic (b. 1821)
 1869 – Mary Ward, Irish astronomer and entomologist (b. 1827)
 1884 – Robert Torrens, Irish-Australian politician, 3rd Premier of South Australia (b. 1814)
 1901–present
 1908 – Leslie Green, English architect (b. 1875)
 1910 – Emīls Dārziņš, Latvian composer, conductor, and music critic (b. 1875)
 1912 – Jean, duc Decazes, French sailor (b. 1864)
 1920 – Wilhelm Wundt, German physician, psychologist, and philosopher (b. 1832)
 1924 – Todor Aleksandrov, Bulgarian soldier (b. 1881)
 1927 – Andranik, Armenian general (b. 1865)
 1937 – Ruth Baldwin, British socialite (b. 1905)
 1940 – Georges Gauthier, Canadian archbishop (b. 1871)
 1941 – Thomas Bavin, New Zealand-Australian politician, 24th Premier of New South Wales (b. 1874)
 1941 – Marina Tsvetaeva, Russian poet and author (b. 1892)
 1948 – Andrei Zhdanov, Russian civil servant and politician (b. 1896)
 1951 – Paul Demel, Czech actor (b. 1903)
 1952 – Henri Bourassa, Canadian publisher and politician (b. 1868)
 1954 – Elsa Barker, American author and poet (b. 1869)
 1963 – Georges Braque, French painter and sculptor (b. 1882)
 1965 – E. E. Smith, American engineer and author (b. 1890)
 1967 – Ilya Ehrenburg, Russian journalist and author (b. 1891)
 1968 – John Hartle, English motorcycle racer (b. 1933)
 1969 – Rocky Marciano, American boxer (b. 1923)
 1973 – John Ford, American actor, director, producer, and screenwriter (b. 1894)
 1974 – William Pershing Benedict, American soldier and pilot (b. 1918)
 1974 – Norman Kirk, New Zealand engineer and politician, 29th Prime Minister of New Zealand (b. 1923)
 1978 – John Wrathall, Rhodesian accountant and politician, 2nd President of Rhodesia (b. 1913)
 1979 – Sally Rand, American actress and dancer (b. 1904)
 1979 – Tiger Smith, English cricketer and coach (b. 1886)
 1984 – Audrey Wagner, American baseball player, obstetrician, and gynecologist (b. 1927)
 1985 – Frank Macfarlane Burnet, Australian virologist and academic, Nobel Prize laureate (b. 1899)
 1986 – Elizabeth Coatsworth, American author and poet (b. 1893)
 1986 – Urho Kekkonen, Finnish journalist, lawyer, and politician, 8th President of Finland (b. 1900)
 1986 – Henry Moore, English sculptor and illustrator (b. 1898)
 1990 – Nathaniel Clifton, American basketball player and coach (b. 1922)
 1991 – Cliff Lumsdon, Canadian swimmer and coach (b. 1931)
 1997 – Diana, Princess of Wales (b. 1961)
 1997 – Dodi Fayed, Egyptian film producer (b. 1955)
 2000 – Lucille Fletcher, American screenwriter (b. 1912)
 2000 – Dolores Moore, American baseball player and educator (b. 1932)
 2002 – Lionel Hampton, American pianist, composer, and bandleader (b. 1908)
 2002 – Farhad Mehrad, Persian singer-songwriter, guitarist, and pianist (b. 1944)
 2002 – George Porter, English chemist and academic, Nobel Prize laureate (b. 1920)
 2005 – Joseph Rotblat, Polish-English physicist and academic, Nobel Prize laureate (b. 1908)
 2006 – Mohamed Abdelwahab, Egyptian footballer (b. 1983)
 2006 – Tom Delaney, English race car driver and businessman (b. 1911)
 2007 – Gay Brewer, American golfer (b. 1932)
 2007 – Jean Jacques Paradis, Canadian general (b. 1928)
 2007 – Sulev Vahtre, Estonian historian and academic (b. 1926)
 2008 – Ken Campbell, English actor and screenwriter (b. 1941)
 2008 – Ike Pappas, American journalist (b. 1933)
 2008 – Victor Yates, New Zealand rugby player (b. 1939)
 2010 – Laurent Fignon, French cyclist (b. 1960)
 2011 – Wade Belak, Canadian ice hockey player (b. 1976)
 2012 – Max Bygraves, English actor (b. 1922)
 2012 – Joe Lewis, American martial artist and actor (b. 1944)
 2012 – Carlo Maria Martini, Italian cardinal (b. 1927)
 2012 – Kashiram Rana, Indian lawyer and politician (b. 1938)
 2012 – John C. Shabaz, American judge and politician (b. 1931)
 2012 – Sergey Sokolov, Russian commander and politician, 6th Minister of Defence for The Soviet Union (b. 1911)
 2013 – Alan Carrington, English chemist and academic (b. 1934)
 2013 – David Frost, English journalist and game show host (b. 1939)
 2013 – Jimmy Greenhalgh, English footballer and manager (b. 1923)
 2013 – Jan Camiel Willems, Belgian mathematician and theorist (b. 1939)
 2014 – Bapu, Indian director and screenwriter (b. 1933)
 2014 – Ștefan Andrei, Romanian politician, 87th Romanian Minister of Foreign Affairs (b. 1931)
 2014 – Stan Goldberg, American illustrator (b. 1932)
 2014 – Carol Vadnais, Canadian ice hockey player and coach (b. 1945)
 2015 – Edward Douglas-Scott-Montagu, 3rd Baron Montagu of Beaulieu, English politician, founded the National Motor Museum (b. 1926)
 2015 – Tom Scott, American football player (b. 1930)
 2018 – Carole Shelley, British-American actress (b. 1939)
 2019 – Anthoine Hubert, French race car driver (b. 1996)
 2019 – Alec Holowka, Canadian game developer (b. 1983)
 2020 – Pranab Mukherjee, Former President of India (b. 1935)
 2020 – Tom Seaver, American baseball player (b. 1944)
 2021 – Mahal, Filipino comedian and actress (b. 1974)
 2021 – Francesco Morini, Italian footballer (b. 1944)
 2021 – Michael Constantine, Greek-American actor (b. 1927)
 2021 – Geronimo, British alpaca (b. 2013)
 Holidays and observances
 Baloch-Pakhtun Unity Day (Balochs and Pashtuns, International observance)
 Christian feast day:
 Aidan of Lindisfarne
 Aristides of Athens
 Cuthburh
 Dominguito del Val
 Joseph of Arimathea
 Nicodemus
 Paulinus of Trier
 Raymond Nonnatus
 Wala of Corbie
 Waltheof, Earl of Northumbria
 August 31 (Eastern Orthodox liturgics)
 Day of Solidarity and Freedom (Poland)
 Independence Day, celebrates the independence of Kyrgyzstan from the Soviet Union in 1991.
 Independence Day, celebrates the independence of Malaya from the United Kingdom in 1957.
 Independence Day, celebrates the independence of Trinidad and Tobago from the United Kingdom in 1962.
 Romanian Language Day (Romania)
 Our Language (Moldova)
 North Borneo Self-government Day (Sabah, Borneo)
 References
 External links
 Days of the year
 August


text:
 16.7.2011
 MT
 Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali tal-Unjoni Ewropea
 C 211/24
 Digriet tal-Qorti Ġenerali tat-23 ta’ Mejju 2011 — Y vs Il-Kummissjoni
 (Kawża T-493/09 P) (1)
 (Appell - Servizz pubbliku - Membri tal-persunal bil-kuntratt - Tkeċċija - Appell parzjalment manifestament inammissibbli u parzjalment manifestament infondat)
 2011/C 211/53
 Lingwa tal-kawża: il-Franċiż
 Partijiet
 Appellant: Y (Brussell, il-Belġju) (rappreżentant: J. Van Rossum, avukat)
 Appellata: Il-Kummissjoni Ewropea (rappreżentant: inizjalment J. P. Keppenne u L. Lozano Palacios, sussegwentement J.-P. Keppenne u D. Martin, aġenti)
 Suġġett
 Appell mis-sentenza tat-Tribunal għas-Servizz Pubbliku tal-Unjoni Ewropea (it-tielet Awla) tas-7 ta’ Ottubru 2009, Y vs Il-Kummissjoni (F-29/08, li għadha ma ġietx ippubblikata fil-Ġabra) u li jitlob l-annullament ta’ din is-sentenza.
 Dispożittiv
 (1)
 L-appell huwa miċħud.
 (2)
 Y għandu jbati l-ispejjeż tiegħu kif ukoll dawk sostnuti mill-Kummissjoni Ewropea fil-kuntest ta’ din l-istanza.
 (1) ĠU C 221, 14.8.2010


text:
Edward/Eduard Jules (van) de Veer (Paramaribo, 22 december 1901 – 22 maart 1979) was een Surinaams politicus.
 Hij was surnumerair bij de algemene dienst en werd in 1921 benoemd tot klerk bij het kantoor van de Koloniale Ontvanger en Betaalmeester. Twee jaar later slaagde hij voor het examen boekhouden. In 1924 werd hij overgeplaatst naar de Administratie van Financiën afdeling Comptabiliteit. Hij vertrok in 1928 naar Curaçao waar hij ging werken bij de bank Morris Curiel & Sons en in 1930 trouwde hij in Paramaribo met Olga Meijer (1906-1964). De Veer zou 27 jaar blijven werken bij die bank tot hij in 1955 in Suriname benoemd werd tot minister van Economische Zaken. Hij kwam toen namens de Partij Suriname (onderdeel van het Eenheidsfront) in het kabinet Ferrier. In 1958 raakte de regering de meerderheid in het parlement kwijt waarop het kabinet viel en er nieuwe verkiezingen volgden.
 De Veer overleed in 1979 op 77-jarige leeftijd.
 Surinaams minister (voor 1975)


type: contracts

text:
 26.10.2012
 GA
 Iris Oifigiúil an Aontais Eorpaigh
 1
 PRÓTACAL (Uimh. 11)
 MAIDIR LE hAIRTEAGAL 42 DEN CHONRADH AR AN AONTAS EORPACH
 TÁ NA hARDPHÁIRTITHE CONARTHACHA,
 AG COIMEÁD I gCUIMHNE DÓIBH an gá chun forálacha an dara fomhír d'Airteagal 42(2) den Chonradh ar an Aontas Eorpach a chur chun feidhme go hiomlán,
 AG COIMEÁD I gCUIMHNE DÓIBH nach ndéanfaidh beartas an Aontais i gcomhréir le hAirteagal 42 dochar do cháilíocht shonrach beartais slándála agus cosanta Ballstát áirithe, agus go n-urramóidh sé na hoibleagáidí a chineann ó Chonradh an Atlantaigh Thuaidh i gcás Ballstát áirithe a mheasann go bhfuil a gcomhchosaint bainte amach acu in ECAT, agus go mbeidh sé ag luí leis an gcomhbheartas slándála agus cosanta arna bhunú sa chreat sin,
 TAR ÉIS COMHAONTÚ ar na forálacha seo a leanas, a chuirfear i gceangal leis an gConradh ar an Aontas Eorpach agus leis an gConradh ar Fheidhmiú an Aontais Eorpaigh:
 Tarraingeoidh an tAontas Eorpach suas, i dteannta le hAontas Iarthar na hEorpa, socruithe maidir le comhar feabhsaithe eatarthu.


text:
 5.7.2008
 PL
 Dziennik Urzędowy Unii Europejskiej
 C 171/47
 Skarga wniesiona w dniu 16 maja 2008 r. — Schuhpark Fascies przeciwko OHIM — Leder & Schuh (jello SCHUHPARK)
 (Sprawa T-183/08)
 (2008/C 171/89)
 Język skargi: niemiecki
 Strony
 Strona skarżąca: Schuhpark Fascies GmbH (Warendorf, Niemcy) (przedstawiciele: A. Peter i J. Braune, Rechtsanwälte)
 Strona pozwana: Urząd Harmonizacji w ramach Rynku Wewnętrznego (znaki towarowe i wzory)
 Uczestnikiem postępowania przed Izbą Odwoławczą była również: Leder & Schuh AG (Graz, Austria)
 Żądania strony skarżącej
 —
 stwierdzenie nieważności decyzji Czwartej Izby Odwoławczej Urzędu Harmonizacji w ramach Rynku Wewnętrznego (znaki towarowe i wzory) z dnia 13 marca 2008 r. w sprawie R 1560/2006-4;
 —
 obciążenie strony pozwanej kosztami postępowania.
 Zarzuty i główne argumenty
 Zgłaszający wspólnotowy znak towarowy: Leder & Schuh AG
 Zgłoszony wspólnotowy znak towarowy: Słowno-graficzny znak towarowy „jello SCHUHPARK” zgłoszony dla towarów z klas 1, 3, 9, 14, 16, 18, 21, 24–26 i 28 (zgłoszenie nr 1 269 372)
 Właściciel znaku lub oznaczenia, na które powołano się w sprzeciwie: Strona skarżąca
 Znak lub oznaczenie, na które powołano się w sprzeciwie: Niemiecki słowny znak towarowy „Schuhpark” zarejestrowany dla towarów z klasy 25 (nr 1 007 149), przy czym sprzeciw był skierowany przeciwko rejestracji dla towarów z klas 18, 21, 25 i 26.
 Decyzja Wydziału Sprzeciwów: Częściowe uwzględnienie sprzeciwu i częściowe odrzucenie zgłoszenia
 Decyzja Izby Odwoławczej: Uchylenie zaskarżonej decyzji i odrzucenie sprzeciwu
 Podniesione zarzuty: Naruszenie art. 43 ust. 2 zdanie drugie i art. 43 ust. 3 rozporządzenia (WE) nr 40/94 (1), jak również zasady 22 ust. 2 zdanie drugie rozporządzenia (WE) nr 2868/95 (2), ponieważ strona skarżąca wystarczająco dowiodła, że znak, na który powołano się w sprzeciwie, był używany w sposób pozwalający na zachowanie praw.
 (1) Rozporządzenie Rady (WE) Nr 40/94 z dnia 20 grudnia 1993 r. w sprawie wspólnotowego znaku towarowego (Dz.U. 1994, L 11, str. 1).
 (2) Rozporządzenie Komisji (WE) nr 2868/95 z dnia 13 grudnia 1995 r. wykonujące rozporządzenie Rady (WE) nr 40/94 w sprawie wspólnotowego znaku towarowego (Dz.U. L 303, str. 1).


type: other

text:
3Ads105/2009
 3 Ads 105/2009-92
 Nejvy11í správní soud rozhodl v senátì slo3⁄4eném z pøedsedy JUDr. Petra Prùchy a soudcù JUDr. Jaroslava Vla1ína a JUDr. Milana Kamlacha v právní vìci 3⁄4alobkynì: B. M., zastoupené JUDr. Janem Koneèným, advokátem se sídlem Oldøichova 273/13, Praha 2, proti 3⁄4alované: Èeská správa sociálního zabezpeèení, se sídlem Køí3⁄4ová 25, Praha 5, proti rozhodnutí 3⁄4alované ze dne 6. 10. 2008, è. j. X, v øízení o kasaèní stí3⁄4nosti 3⁄4alobkynì proti rozsudku Mìstského soudu v Praze ze dne 3. 3. 2009, è. j. 1 Cad 140/2008-13,
 III. Ustanovenému zástupci 3⁄4alobkynì JUDr. Janu Koneènému, advokátu, s e p ø i z n á v á odmìna za zastupování ve vý1i 1600 Kè, která mu bude vyplacena z úètu Nejvy11ího správního soudu do 60 dnù od právní moci tohoto rozhodnutí
 ®alobkynì podala kasaèní stí3⁄4nost proti rozsudku Mìstského soudu v Praze (dále jen mìstský soud ) ze dne 3. 3. 2009, è. j. 1 Cad 140/2008-13, kterým byla zamítnuta její 3⁄4aloba proti rozhodnutí 3⁄4alované ze dne 6. 10. 2008, è. j. X (dále jen napadené rozhodnutí ). Tímto napadeným rozhodnutím jí byl od 22. 6. 2008 pøiznán starobní dùchod podle § 29 písm. b) zákona è. 155/1995 Sb., o dùchodovém poji1tìní, ve znìní úèinném k datu rozhodování 3⁄4alované, (dále jen zákon è. 155/1995 Sb. ), ve vý1i 2920 Kè.
 Proti napadenému rozhodnutí podala 3⁄4alobkynì 3⁄4alobu, v ní3⁄4 namítla, 3⁄4e jí byl starobní dùchod vymìøen v nesprávné vý1i, nebo» jí mìl být pøiznán podle § 29 písm. a) zákona è. 155/1995 Sb. a nikoli podle § 29 písm. b) tohoto zákona, proto3⁄4e 3⁄4alovaná nezohlednila dobu nezamìstnanosti, která byla údajnì zpùsobena politickou perzekucí v období od 25. 2. 1948 do 1. 1. 1990 (dále jen rozhodné období ). Uvedla, 3⁄4e 3⁄4alovaná odmítá zohlednit dùkazy dokládající, 3⁄4e byla v období let 1980-1989 nedobrovolnì nezamìstnaná v dùsledku politické perzekuce. Tuto skuteènost podle ní prokazují zejména potvrzení Obvodního národního výboru v Praze 5 ze dne 27. 7. 1990 a ze dne 10. 9. 1990. Sdìlila, 3⁄4e do naøízení jednání pøedlo3⁄4í mìstskému soudu originály dokladù a listin svìdèící o tom, 3⁄4e byla nezamìstnána v dùsledku politické perzekuce. Podle jejího názoru bylo napadené rozhodnutí v rozporu s § 68 odst. 3 zákona è. 500/2004 Sb., správní øád, ve znìní pozdìj1ích pøedpisù (dále jen s. ø.), proto3⁄4e nebylo odùvodnìno z jakých dùvodù 3⁄4alovaná nehodnotila dobu její nezamìstnanosti jako náhradní dobu poji1tìní podle § 13 odst. 2 zákona è. 155/1995 Sb. Dále se ohradila proti tomu, 3⁄4e si 3⁄4alovaná nevy3⁄4ádala její souèinnost , a tím zatí3⁄4ila správní øízení zásadní vadou. Rovnì3⁄4 3⁄4alované vytkla, 3⁄4e napadené rozhodnutí není opatøeno originálním podpisem osoby odpovìdné za jeho vydání.
 Mìstský soud posoudil doklady pøedlo3⁄4ené 3⁄4alobkyní v prùbìhu správního a soudního øízení a shledal, 3⁄4e neprokazují, 3⁄4e její pracovní pomìr byl v rozhodném období ukonèen z dùvodu politické perzekuce ve smyslu § 21 zákona è. 87/1991 Sb., o mimosoudních rehabilitacích, ve znìní pozdìj1ích pøedpisù (dále je zákon è. 87/1991 Sb. ). Z potvrzení Obvodního národního výboru v Praze 5 ze dne 27. 7. 1990 podle mìstského soudu pouze vyplývá, 3⁄4e 3⁄4alobkynì nemù3⁄4e být vedena v evidenci uchazeèù o zamìstnání, nebo» nesplòuje podmínku odpracované doby 1 roku v posledních 3 letech. Pøípis Obvodního národního výboru v Praze 5 ze dne 10. 9. 1990 se týká jen jejího man3⁄4ela M. M. a je v nìm uvedeno, 3⁄4e pan M. M. pøedlo3⁄4il doklady, z nich3⁄4 podle Obvodního národního výboru v Praze 5 vyplývá, 3⁄4e v rozhodném období byl politicky perzekuován, a proto jej vzal do evidence uchazeèù o zamìstnání a doporuèil Federálnímu ministerstvu práce a sociálních vìcí, aby mu v øízení o odstranìní tvrdosti zapoèetli jako dobu náhradní i dobu, po kterou nebyl v rozhodném obodobí zamìstnán. Tyto ani jiné v odùvodnìní rozsudku citované listiny podle mìstského soudu neprokazují, 3⁄4e její pracovní pomìr byl v rozhodném obodobí ukonèen z dùvodu politické perzekuce ve smyslu § 21 zákona è. 87/1991 Sb. Mìstský soud zdùraznil, 3⁄4e 3⁄4alobkynì nepo3⁄4ádala 3⁄4alovanou o postup podle zákona è. 87/1991 Sb. a v prùbìhu soudního øízení podle mìstského soudu neprokázala jiné doby poji1tìní, ne3⁄4 jsou uvedeny v evidenèním listì dùchodového poji1tìní, tj. 22 let a 315 dnù. Z tohoto dùvodu jí nále3⁄4í starobní dùchod podle § 29 písm. b) zákona è. 155/1995 Sb.
 Mìstský soud dále jako nedùvodné posoudil námitky 3⁄4alobkynì týkající se postupu správního orgánu pøed vydáním rozhodnutí a nále3⁄4itosti rozhodnutí správního orgánu s ohledem na § 85a zákona è. 582/1991 Sb., o organizaci a provádìní sociálního zabezpeèení (dále jen zákona è. 582/1991 Sb. ), podle kterého 3⁄4alovaná nemá povinnost 3⁄4ádat úèastníka øízení o jeho vyjádøení k podkladùm rozhodnutí. Rovnì3⁄4 poukázal na § 86 odst. 1 tého3⁄4 zákona stanovující, 3⁄4e pøi vyhotovení rozhodnutí s pou3⁄4itím automatizované výpoèetní techniky mù3⁄4e být rozhodnutí vydáno v mezinárodní abecedì s pøedti1tìným razítkem orgánu sociálního zabezpeèení a jménem, pøíjmením a funkcí zamìstnance odpovìdného za vydání rozhodnutí. Z tìchto dùvodù 3⁄4alobu podle § 78 odst. 7 s. ø. s. zamítl jako nedùvodnou.
 Proti tomuto rozsudku podala 3⁄4alobkynì (dále jen stì3⁄4ovatelka ) kasaèní stí3⁄4nost z dùvodù podle § 103 odst. 1 písm. a) a b) s. ø. s. Mìstskému soudu vytkla, 3⁄4e její vìc projednal a rozhodl dne 3. 3. 2009 bez její úèasti, v ní3⁄4 jí zabránil úraz. Uvedla, 3⁄4e se nemohla nechat o1etøit a svoji neúèast nemohla ani omluvit . Dále namítla, 3⁄4e pøípisy Obvodního národního výboru v Praze 5 ze dne 27. 5. 7. 1990 a ze dne 10. 9. 1990 mìly být vylo3⁄4eny v její prospìch, nebo» dokládají, 3⁄4e získala po3⁄4adovanou dobu poji1tìní. V této souvislosti zdùraznila, 3⁄4e na jejich základì bylo vyhovìno jejímu bývalému man3⁄4elovi, a proto by je mìl takto mìstský soud posoudit i ve vztahu k její osobì. Ohradila se také proti tomu, 3⁄4e jí nebyla zapoètena doba poji1tìní z pracovního pomìru na Západoèeském krajském národním výboru v dobì od 15. 7. 1959 do 30. 6. 1972, pøesto3⁄4e jej dolo3⁄4ila ji3⁄4 pøi první 3⁄4ádosti o pøiznání starobního dùchodu ze dne roku 2004.
 Nejvy11í správní soud pøezkoumal napadený rozsudek krajského soudu i øízení, je3⁄4 jeho vydání pøedcházelo, v souladu s § 109 odst. 2 a 3 s. ø. s., neshledal pøitom vady, k nim3⁄4 by musel podle § 109 odst. 3 s. ø. s. pøihlédnout z úøední povinnosti; vázán rozsahem a dùvody, které stì3⁄4ovatelka uplatnila ve své kasaèní stí3⁄4nosti, dospìl k závìru, 3⁄4e kasaèní stí3⁄4nost není dùvodná.
 Stì3⁄4ovatelèinu výtku, 3⁄4e mìstský soud její vìc projednal a rozhodl dne 3. 3. 2009 bez její úèasti, Nejvy11í správní soud podøadil ve smyslu § 109 odst. 3 s. ø. s. pod kasaèní dùvod podle § 103 odst. 1 písm. d) s. ø. s. a hodnotil, zda rozsudek mìstského soudu nebyl z tohoto dùvodu zatí3⁄4en vadou která mohla mít za následek nezákonné rozhodnutí o vìci samé. Nejvy11í správní soud pøipomíná, 3⁄4e podle § 49 odst. 1 s. ø. s. naøídí pøedseda senátu krajského soudu rozhodujícího ve správním soudnictví jednání a pøedvolá k nìmu úèastníky tak, aby mìli k pøípravì alespoò deset pracovních dnù; o jednání vyrozumí osoby zúèastnìné na øízení. Podle odst. 3 tého3⁄4 ustanovení neúèast øádnì pøedvolaných úèastníkù nebrání projednání a skonèení vìci, nejsou-li dùvody pro odroèení podle § 50 s. ø. s. Podle § 50 s. ø. s. mù3⁄4e být jednání z dùle3⁄4itých dùvodù odroèeno; soud mù3⁄4e odroèit jednání té3⁄4 tehdy, jestli3⁄4e to úèastníci shodnì navrhnou. O takový dùle3⁄4itý dùvod by 1lo napøíklad v situaci, kdy úèastník pøed zahájením jednání po3⁄4ádal o jeho odroèení z dùvodu pracovní neschopnosti, kterou osvìdèí, a z okolností pøípadu, zejména z úèastníkova dosavadního chování, zároveò není patrné, 3⁄4e omluva je motivována snahou prodlu3⁄4ovat soudní øízení (viz rozsudek Nejvy11ího správního soudu ze dne 17. 2. 2005, è. j. 2 Afs 5/2005-96, pøístupný na www.nssoud.cz). Ze soudního spisu i z výslovného vyjádøení stì3⁄4ovatelky je v1ak zøejmé, 3⁄4e tato situace nenastala. Stì3⁄4ovatelka pøedvolání k naøízenému jednání ve vìci na 3. 3. 2009 pøevzala dne 22. 1. 2009 (viz è.l. 10 soudního spisu). Byla jí tedy dána zákonná lhùta deseti pracovních dní k pøípravì na jednání. Z protokolu o jednání zalo3⁄4eném na è.l. 12 soudního spisu i ze samotné dikce stì3⁄4ovatelèiny námitky vyplývá, 3⁄4e svoji neúèast na jednání nijak neomluvila (dokonce ani následnì). Nejvy11í správní soud shodnì s mìstským soudem neshledal ani 3⁄4ádný jiný dùvod pro odroèení jednání ve smyslu § 50 s. ø. s. Za této situace tedy postup mìstského soudu, který projednal a rozhodl danou vìc, je plnì v souladu s § 49 odst. 3 s. ø. s. a není vadou øízení, je3⁄4 by mohla mít vliv na nezákonnost rozhodnutí o vìci samé.
 Stì3⁄4ovatelka se v øízení domáhá toho, aby doba mezi lety 1980-1989, kdy nebyla zamìstnána, jí byla podle § 24 zákona è. 87/1991 Sb. uznána za dobu zamìstnání, v dùsledku èeho3⁄4 by získala potøebnou dobu poji1tìní pro vznik nároku na starobní dùchod podle § 29 písm. a) zákona è. 155/1995 Sb. Podle stì3⁄4ovatelky byla toti3⁄4 nezamìstnaná v dùsledku politické perzekuce, o èem3⁄4 mají svìdèit pøípisy Obvodního národního výboru v Praze 5 ze dne 25. 7. 1990 a ze dne 10. 9. 1990. Nejvy11í správní soud k této zásadní výtce uvádí, 3⁄4e podle § 24 zákona è. 87/1991 Sb. se za dobu zamìstnání pro úèely dùchodového zabezpeèení pova3⁄4uje doba od skonèení pracovního vztahu, které bylo neplatné ve smyslu § 21 tohoto zákona, do dne vzniku nároku na dùchod, nejdéle v1ak do dne úèinnosti tohoto zákona (tj. do 1. 4. 1991-pozn. NSS). Podle § 21 odst. 1 zákona è. 87/1991 Sb. se za neplatný pro úèely tohoto zákona pova3⁄4uje právní úkon, jím3⁄4 do1lo v rozhodném období ke skonèení pracovního nebo slu3⁄4ebního pomìru nebo èlenského pomìru k dru3⁄4stvu z dùvodu politické perzekuce nebo postupu poru1ujícího obecnì uznávaná lidská práva a svobody (§ 2 odst. 2 a 3), zejména a) spoèívá-li jeho dùvod v odsouzení pro trestný èin (zloèin, pøeèin, pøestupek), jestli3⁄4e soudní rozhodnutí bylo zru1eno podle oddílu druhého a tøetího zákona è. 119/1990 Sb., o soudní rehabilitaci, ve znìní zákona è. 47/1991 Sb., a trestní stíhání bylo zastaveno nebo obvinìný byl v celém rozsahu zpro1tìn viny; b) byl-li uèinìn podle zákonného opatøení pøedsednictva Federálního shromá3⁄4dìní è. 99/1969
 Sb., o nìkterých pøechodných opatøeních nutných k upevnìní a ochranì veøejného poøádku; c) byla-li dána výpovìï podle § 46 odst. 1 zákoníku práce è. 65/1965 Sb., ve znìní zákona è. 153/1969 Sb., proto, 3⁄4e pracovník naru1il svou èinností socialistický spoleèenský øád a nemìl proto dùvìru potøebnou k zastávání dosavadní funkce nebo svého dosavadního pracovního místa; d) byl-li pracovní pomìr okam3⁄4itì zru1en podle § 53 odst. 1 písm. c) zákoníku práce è. 65/1965 Sb., ve znìní zákona è. 153/1969 Sb.; e) dohoda o skonèení pracovního vztahu, byla-li pracovníkem uzavøena pod tlakem politické perzekuce nebo postupu poru1ujícího obecnì uznávaná lidská práva a svobody. Podle odstavce druhého se zru1ují soudní rozhodnutí, jimi3⁄4 byly zamítnuty návrhy nebo schváleny smíry ve vìcech urèení neplatnosti skonèení pracovního vztahu v pøípadech uvedených v odstavci 1. Podle § 22 odst. 1 a3⁄4 4 tého3⁄4 zákona, na 3⁄4ádost toho, jeho3⁄4 pracovní vztah skonèil z dùvodù uvedených v § 21, vydá mu o tom osvìdèení organizace, u ní3⁄4 byl v pracovním vztahu, nebo její právní nástupce. ®ádost podle odstavce 1 lze podat do 1esti mìsícù ode dne úèinnosti tohoto zákona. Nevydá-li organizace osvìdèení do tøí mìsícù ode dne, kdy 3⁄4ádost obdr3⁄4ela, mù3⁄4e osoba uvedená v odstavci 1 podat do dvou let ode dne úèinnosti tohoto zákona soudu návrh na urèení, 3⁄4e dùvodem skonèení pracovního vztahu byly okolnosti uvedené v § 21. Za osvìdèení ve smyslu odstavce 1 se pova3⁄4uje i osvìdèení nebo jiný doklad vydaný organizací pøede dnem úèinnosti tohoto zákona, jako3⁄4 i soudní rozhodnutí, jestli3⁄4e z nich vyplývá, 3⁄4e pracovní pomìr skonèil z dùvodù uvedených v § 21.
 Pro posouzení dané vìci je klíèové, jakými dùkazy lze prokázat, 3⁄4e pracovní vztah byl ukonèen z dùvodu politické perzekuce nebo postupu poru1ujícího obecnì uznávaná lidská práva a svobody ve smyslu § 21 zákona è. 87/1991 Sb., aby doba nezamìstnanosti v rozhodném období byla podle § 24 tohoto zákona pova3⁄4ována za dobu zamìstnání. Stì3⁄4ovatelka tvrdí, 3⁄4e skonèení pracovního vztahu z dùvodu politické perzekuce lze prokázat pøedkládanými dùkazy (zejména citovanými pøípisy Obvodního národního výboru v Praze 5). Nejvy11í správní soud v této souvislosti pova3⁄4uje za nezbytné pøipomenout, 3⁄4e touto otázkou se ji3⁄4 ve své pøedchozí rozhodovací èinnosti zabýval a dospìl k závìru, 3⁄4e skonèení pracovního vztahu z dùvodu politické perzekuce, které je neplatné podle § 21 zákona è. 87/1991 Sb., je nutné prokázat kvalifikovanými dùkazy, a to citovaným osvìdèením, pøípadnì soudním rozhodnutím ve smyslu § 22 uvedeného zákona. Nejvy11í správní soud toti3⁄4 ve svém rozsudku ze dne 27. 5. 2009, è.j. 6 Ads 90/2008-86, uvedl, 3⁄4e k tomu, aby namítaná doba (pøed rokem 1990, kdy stì3⁄4ovatelka nebyla zamìstnána), byla uznána za dobu zamìstnání ve smyslu § 24 zákona è. 87/1991 Sb., je tøeba, aby bylo dolo3⁄4eno osvìdèením organizace, u ní3⁄4 do1lo ke skonèení pracovního pomìru z dùvodù uvedených v § 21 uvedeného zákona (z dùvodu politické perzekuce nebo postupu poru1ujícího obecnì uznávaná lidská práva a svobody), pøípadnì soudním rozhodnutím, 3⁄4e dùvodem skonèení pracovního pomìru byly okolnosti uvedené v § 21 a § 22 tého3⁄4 zákona. Uvedené osvìdèení vydané organizací, pøípadnì rozhodnutí soudu, nelze nahradit jiným zpùsobem, zejména nelze na správním orgánu po3⁄4adovat, aby provádìl dokazování k posouzení, zda dùvodem skonèení pracovního pomìru byly okolnosti uvedené v § 21 tého3⁄4 zákona. S tímto názorem se výslovnì ztoto3⁄4nil rovnì3⁄4 Ústavní soud ve svém usnesení ze dne 7. 10. 2009, sp. zn. I. ÚS 2306/09, v nìm3⁄4 uvedl, 3⁄4e uvedené osvìdèení vydané organizací, pøípadnì rozhodnutí soudu, nelze nahradit jiným zpùsobem, nebo» zákon è. 87/1991 Sb. takovou mo3⁄4nost nepøipou1tí. Rovnì3⁄4 uvedl, 3⁄4e jiná ne3⁄4 pøíslu1nou organizací èi soudním rozhodnutím vyslovená stanoviska by v tomto ohledu nemusela být objektivní a nezpochybnitelná. Nejvy11í správní soud pøitom pova3⁄4uje za nutné zdùraznit, 3⁄4e citované názory Nejvy11í správní soud i Ústavní soud vyslovil ve vìci M. M., man3⁄4ela stì3⁄4ovatelky, který se domáhal, aby mu doba mezi lety 1983-1990, kdy nebyl zamìstnán, byla uznána za dobu zamìstnání ve smyslu § 24 zákona è. 87/1991 Sb. ®ádost M. M. o uznání uvedené doby nezamìstnanosti za dobu zamìstnání byla zamítnuta, co3⁄4 z vý1e uvedených dùvodù potvrdil jak Nejvy11í správní soud, tak Ústavní soud. Nejvy11í správní soud tedy pova3⁄4uje námitku stì3⁄4ovatelky, 3⁄4e na základì dokladù, které pøedlo3⁄4ila bylo vyhovìno jejímu bývalému man3⁄4elovi, a proto je mìl mìstský soud shodným zpùsobem posoudit i ve vztahu k její osobì, za mylnou, nebo» mìstský soud pøedlo3⁄4ené doklady posoudil zcela shodnì jako ve vìci jejího man3⁄4ela vedené pod sp. zn. 4 Cad 110/2006 (následnì posouzené Nejvy11ím správním soudem pod sp. zn. 6 Ads 90/2008 a Ústavním soudem pod sp. zn. I. ÚS 2306/09).
 V této vìci je tedy rozhodující, zda listiny pøedlo3⁄4ené stì3⁄4ovatelkou jsou osvìdèením organizace, u ní3⁄4 do1lo ke skonèení pracovního vztahu nebo jejím právním nástupcem, a není-li ani nástupce, ústøedním orgánem, do jeho3⁄4 pùsobnosti by organizace nále3⁄4ela, o tom, 3⁄4e pracovní vztah skonèil z dùvodu politické perzekuce, a tedy neplatnì. Stì3⁄4ovatelka namítala, 3⁄4e v období let 1980-1989 byla nedobrovolnì nezamìstnaná v dùsledku politické perzekuce. Nejvy11í správní soud ze správního spisu zjistil, 3⁄4e stì3⁄4ovatelka byla v roce 1980 naposledy zamìstnána u Západoèeského autodru3⁄4stva v Plzni. Stì3⁄4ovatelka skonèení pracovního vztahu u tohoto zamìstnavatele z dùvodu politické perzekuce osvìdèovala pøedlo3⁄4ením potvrzení Obvodního národního výboru v Praze 5 ze dne 25. 7. 1990, z nìho3⁄4 pouze vyplývá, 3⁄4e nemù3⁄4e být vedena v evidenci uchazeèù o zamìstnání, nebo» nesplòuje podmínku odpracované doby 1 roku v posledních 3 letech, a dále také pøípisem Obvodního národního výboru v Praze 5 ze dne 10. 9. 1990. Z tohoto pøípisu vyplývá, 3⁄4e pan M. M. pøedlo3⁄4il doklady, z nich3⁄4 podle Obvodního národního výboru v Praze 5 vyplývá, 3⁄4e v rozhodném období byl politicky perzekuován, a proto jej i s ohledem na to, 3⁄4e jeho man3⁄4elka (stì3⁄4ovatelka-pozn. NSS) je nezamìstnaná, vzal do evidence uchazeèù o zamìstnání a doporuèil Federálnímu ministerstvu práce a sociálních vìcí, aby mu v øízení o odstranìní tvrdosti byla zapoètena jako doba náhradní i doba, po kterou nebyl v rozhodném obodobí zamìstnán. Dále dolo3⁄4ila pøípisy èeskoslovenského helsinského výboru ze dne 1. 3. 1990 a ze dne 29. 12. 1992 3⁄4ádající Obvodní soud pro Prahu 5, aby jí prominul pokutu za nedostavení se k soudnímu jednání, nebo» se svým man3⁄4elem byli v dùsledku politického tlaku nuceni pøistoupit na výmìnu bytu. Rovnì3⁄4 dolo3⁄4ila kopii dopisu Dr. B. C., pøedsedkynì IGFM, mezinárodní spoleènosti pro lidská práva-èeskoslovenské sekce ze dne 2. 6. 1993, v nìm3⁄4 se pøedsedkynì ICFM pøimlouvá, aby stì3⁄4ovatelka byla pøijata na místo sekretáøky-referentky stí3⁄4ností i s ohledem na to, 3⁄4e v 80tých letech byla pro své pøesvìdèení spoleènì s man3⁄4elem pronásledována. Nejvy11í správní soud posoudil tyto ve spise zalo3⁄4ené písemnosti a shledal, 3⁄4e 3⁄4ádná z nich není osvìdèením Západoèeského autodru3⁄4stva v Plzni (u nìj3⁄4 do1lo ke skonèení pracovního vztahu v roce 1980) nebo jeho právního nástupce, pøíp. ústøedního orgánu, do jeho3⁄4 pùsobnosti by tato organizace nále3⁄4ela. Nejvy11í správní soud rovnì3⁄4 zjistil, 3⁄4e dávkový spis neobsahuje 3⁄4ádost stì3⁄4ovatelky o mimosoudní rehabilitaci podle zákona è. 87/1991 Sb. ani rozhodnutí soudu ve smyslu § 22 uvedeného zákona o neplatném právním úkonu, na jeho3⁄4 základì skonèil pracovní vztah. Proto3⁄4e podle vý1e citovaného názoru Nejvy11ího správního soudu vysloveného v rozsudku ze dne 27. 5. 2009, è. j. 6 Ads 90/2008-86, který byl následnì potvrzen v uvedené vìci usnesením Ústavního soudu ze dne 7. 10. 2009, sp. zn. I. ÚS 2306/09, nelze po3⁄4adované osvìdèení vydané organizací, pøípadnì rozhodnutí soudu nahradit jiným zpùsobem, pøièem3⁄4 zejména nelze na správním orgánu po3⁄4adovat, aby provádìl dokazování k posouzení, zda dùvodem skonèení pracovního pomìru byly okolnosti uvedené v § 21 zákona è. 87/1991 Sb., nebo» tento zákon takovou mo3⁄4nost nepøipou1tí. Jeliko3⁄4 senát 3 Ads Nejvy11ího správního soudu neshledal dùvod se od tohoto názoru odchýlit a pøedlo3⁄4it tak vìc roz1íøenému senátu, dospìl v posuzované vìci k závìru, 3⁄4e z 3⁄4ádné z pøedlo3⁄4ených písemností nevyplývá, 3⁄4e by pracovní vztah stì3⁄4ovatelky v letech 1980-1989 byl skonèen z dùvodù uvedených v § 21 odst. 1 zákona è. 87/1991 Sb. Nejvy11í správní soud proto nepova3⁄4uje tuto námitku stì3⁄4ovatelky vùèi závìru mìstského soudu za dùvodnou.
 K výhradì stì3⁄4ovatelky týkající se nezapoèítání doby poji1tìní od 15. 7. 1959 do 30. 6. 1972 Nejvy11í správní soud pøipomíná, 3⁄4e ji stì3⁄4ovatelka neuplatnila v øízení pøed mìstským soudem, jeho3⁄4 rozsudek je pøezkoumáván, aè tak uèinit mohla, a proto se touto námitkou nemohl zabývat, nebo» je podle § 104 odst. 4 s. ø. s. nepøípustná. Po aktivnì legitimovaných úèastnících pøedcházejícího 3⁄4alobního øízení lze toti3⁄4 spravedlivì 3⁄4ádat, aby na principu vigilantibus iura uplatnili ve1keré dùvody nezákonnosti správního rozhodnutí ji3⁄4 v øízení pøed soudem prvé instance. Pokud tak neuèiní, je legitimní, 3⁄4e z hlediska mo3⁄4nosti uplatnìní argumentace v dal1ím stupni ponesou pøípadné nepøíznivé následky s tím spojené (viz rozsudek Nejvy11ího správního soudu ze dne 25. 9. 2008, 8 Afs 48/2006-155; obdobnì té3⁄4 rozsudky Nejvy11ího správního soudu ze dne 17. 2. 2006, è. j. 8 Azs 134/2005-44; ze dne 3. 9. 2008, è. j. 1 Afs 102/2008-39; èi ze dne 29. 12. 2005, è. j. 1 Ads 1/2004-47, pøístupné na www.nssoud.cz). Nejvy11í správní soud nadto podotýká, ani3⁄4 by z vý1e uvedeného dùvodu jakkoli hodnotil správnost postupu 3⁄4alované, 3⁄4e z osobního listu dùchodového poji1tìní vyplývá, 3⁄4e 3⁄4alovaná namítané doby hodnotila a poèítala s nimi pøi stanovení celkové doby poji1tìní stì3⁄4ovatelky.
 Ze v1ech shora uvedených dùvodù Nejvy11í správní soud dospìl k závìru, kasaèní stí3⁄4nost není dùvodná, a proto ji jako takovou zamítl (§ 110 odst. 1 s. ø. s.).
 O náhradì nákladù øízení rozhodl Nejvy11í správní soud v souladu s ustanovením § 60 odst. 1, 2 ve spojení s § 120 s. ø. s. Stì3⁄4ovatelka nemìla ve vìci úspìch, a proto nemá právo na náhradu nákladù øízení, které jí vznikly. ®alovanému správnímu orgánu, který by jinak mìl právo na náhradu nákladù øízení, nelze náhradu nákladù øízení v souladu s ustanovením § 60 odst. 2 s. ø. s. pøiznat.
 Odmìna ustanovenému zástupci stì3⁄4ovatelky, advokátu JUDr. Janu Koneènému, byla stanovena podle vyúètování ze dne 24. 9. 2009 za dva úkony právní slu3⁄4by po 500 Kè (první porada s klientkou vèetnì pøevzetí a pøípravy zastoupení, doplnìní kasaèní stí3⁄4nosti), a to podle ustanovení § 7, § 9 odst. 3 písm. f) ve spojení s § 9 odst. 2 a § 11 odst. 1 písm. b), d) vyhlá1ky è. 177/1996 Sb. a dále mu byla zapoèítána náhrada hotových výdajù podle § 13 odst. 3 té3⁄4e vyhlá1ky po 300 Kè. Nahlí3⁄4ení do spisu a studium spisu, které ustanovený advokát provádìl na poèátku zastupování v øízení o kasaèní stí3⁄4nosti, je toti3⁄4 tøeba pro urèení odmìny a náhrady hotových výdajù advokáta pova3⁄4ovat za souèást úkonu právní slu3⁄4by spoèívajícího v pøevzetí a pøípravì zastoupení dle § 11 odst. 1 písm. b) vyhlá1ky è. 177/1996 Sb., o odmìnách advokátù a náhradách advokátù za poskytování právních slu3⁄4eb, nikoli za samostatný úkon právní slu3⁄4by (viz usnesení Nejvy11ího správního soudu ze dne 29. 4. 2008, è. j. 5 Azs 33/2008-40, pøístupný na www.nssoud.cz). Celková vý1e jeho odmìny tedy èiní 1600 Kè (2 x 500 Kè + 2 x 300 Kè). Jeliko3⁄4 ustanovený advokát uvedl, 3⁄4e není plátcem DPH, nebyla mu odmìna zvý1ena o èástku této danì. Odmìna stanovená zástupci stì3⁄4ovatelky v celkové vý1i 1600 Kè mu bude vyplacena do 60 dnù od právní moci tohoto rozsudku.


text:
 22.9.2012
 MT
 Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali tal-Unjoni Ewropea
 C 287/19
 Talba għal deċiżjoni preliminari mressqa mill-Arbeitsgerichts Nienburg (il-Ġermanja) fis-27 ta’ Ġunju 2012 — Heinz Kassner vs Mittelweser-Tiefbau GmbH & Co. KG
 (Kawża C-311/12)
 2012/C 287/36
 Lingwa tal-kawża: il-Ġermaniż
 Qorti tar-rinviju
 Arbeitsgerichts Nienburg
 Partijiet fil-kawża prinċipali
 Rikorrent: Heinz Kassner
 Konvenuta: Mittelweser-Tiefbau GmbH & Co. KG
 Domandi preliminari
 (1)
 L-Artikolu 31 tal-Karta tad-Drittijiet Fundamentali tal-Unjoni Ewropea (iktar ’il quddiem il-“Karta” u l-Artikolu 7(1) tad-Direttiva 2003/88/KE (1), tal-4 ta’ Novembru 2003, li tikkonċerna ċerti aspetti tal-organizzazzjoni tal-ħin tax-xogħol (iktar ’il quddiem id-“Direttiva 2003/88/KE”) għandhom jiġu interpretati fis-sens li jipprekludu leġiżlazzjoni nazzjonali li tipprovdi li, f’ċerti setturi, it-tul tal-leave annwali minimu ta’ erba’ ġimgħat jista’ jitnaqqas permezz ta’ ftehim kollettiv?
 (2)
 L-Artikolu 31 tal-Karta u l-Artikolu 7(1) tad-Direttiva 2003/88/KE għandhom jiġu interpretati fis-sens li jipprekludu leġiżlazzjoni nazzjonali li tippermetti li jiġi provdut, permezz ta’ ftehim kollettiv, li tnaqqis fir-remunerazzjoni kkawżat matul il-perijodu ta’ riferiment minħabba waqfien parzjali mix-xogħol, ġranet ta’ xogħol mitlufa jew l-assenza involontarja tal-ħaddiem mix-xogħol jittieħu inkunsiderazzjoni fil-kalkolu tal-ħlas tal-leave, hekk li l-konsegwenza hija li l-ħaddiem ma jirċievi ebda kumpens ta’ leave għat-tul tal-leave annwali minimu ta’ erba’ ġimgħat jew ebda kumpens finanzjarju ta’ leave mhux meħud fil-każ ta’ terminazzjoni tar-relazzjoni ta’ xogħol?
 (3)
 Fil-każ li d-domanda 2 tingħata risposta affermattiva, l-Artikolu 31 tal-Karta u l-Artikolu 7(1) tad-Direttiva 2003/88/KE għandhom jiġu interpretati fis-sens li jipprekludu dispożizzjoni leġiżlattiva nazzjonali li tippermetti li jiġi provdut, permezz ta’ ftehim kollettiv, li tnaqqis fir-remunerazzjoni kkawżat matul il-perijodu ta’ riferiment minħabba waqfien parzjali mix-xogħol, ġranet ta’ xogħol mitlufa jew l-assenza involontarja tal-ħaddiem mix-xogħol jittieħu inkunsiderazzjoni fil-kalkolu tal-ħlas tal-leave, hekk li l-konsegwenza hija li l-ħaddiem jirċievi, għat-tul tal-leave annwali minimu ta’ erba’ ġimgħat, kumpens ta’ leave — jew, fil-każ ta’ terminazzjoni tar-relazzjoni ta’ xogħol, kumpens finanzjarju ta’ leave mhux meħud — inqas minn dak li kien jirċievi kieku ttieħed abbażi tar-remunerazzjoni medja li kien jibbenefika minnha matul il-perijodu ta’ riferiment mingħajr tali tnaqqis fir-remunerazzjoini? Fil-każ ta’ riposta affermattiva, sa liema perċentwali massimu, ikkalkolat skont ir-remunerazzjoni medja mhux imnaqqsa tal-ħaddiem, il-kumpens tal-leave jista’ jitnaqqas permezz ta’ ftehim kollettiv fil-każ ta’ waqfien parzjali mix-xogħol, ġranet ta’ xogħol mitlufa jew l-assenza involontarja tal-ħaddiem mix-xogħol matul il-perijodu ta’ riferiment, sabiex id-dispożizzjoni nazzjonali li tawtorizza tali tnaqqis tkun konformi mad-dritt tal-Unjoni?
 (4)
 L-Artikolu 31 tal-Karta u l-Artikolu 7(1) tad-Direttiva 2003/88/KE għandhom jiġu interpretati fis-sens li jipprekludu d-dispożizzjoni nazzjonali ta’ ftehim kollettiv li tipprovdi li, għall-perijodi tas-sena li matulhom il-ħaddiem bil-leave tal-mard la rċieva remunerazzjoni u lanqas kumpens għal mard jew għal diżabbiltà, huwa ma jakkwista l-ebda dritt għal leave, sa fejn dan ikollu l-konsegwenza li l-ħaddiem jkollu dritt għal inqas minn erba’ ġimgħat ta’ leave annwali?
 (5)
 L-Artikolu 31 tal-Karta u l-Artikolu 7(1) tad-Direttiva 2003/88/KE għandhom jiġu interpretati fis-sens li jipprekludu d-dispożizzjoni nazzjonali ta’ ftehim kollettiv li tipprovdi li, għas-snin li matulhom, wara ġranet ta’ xogħol mitlufa jew ta’ assenza involontarja tal-ħaddiem mix-xogħol, b’mod partikolari minħabba mard, ebda salarju gross ma ġie effettivament riċevut, ma hemm l-ebda dritt għal kumpens ta’ leave jew, fil-każ ta’ terminazzjoni tar-relazzjoni ta’ xogħol, ta’ dritt għal kumpens finazjarju ta’ leave mhux meħud?
 (6)
 L-Artikolu 31 tal-Karta u l-Artikolu 7(1) tad-Direttiva 2003/88/KE għandhom jiġu interpretati fis-sens li jipprekludu d-dispożizzjoni nazzjonali ta’ ftehim kollettiv li tipprovdi li d-drittijiet għal leave u d-drittijiet għal kumpens finanzjarju għal leave mhux meħud jintilfu fl-iskadenza tas-sena kalendarja li tiġi eżatt wara s-sena li fiha jkunu akkwistati d-drittijiet għal kumpens, u b’hekk tiġi limitata l-possibbiltà għal ħaddiem li jkun inkapaċi għal xogħol matul diversi perijodi ta’ riferiment suċċessivi li jakkumula drittijiet għal leave annwali mħallas? Fil-każ ta’ risposta affermattiva, id-dritt tal-Unjoni huwa applikat aħjar u b’mod ikar effikaċi fid-dritt nazzjonali meta tali dispożizzjoni tal-ftehim tibqa’ mhux applikata għal kollox jew meta hija interpretata skont id-dritt tal-Unjoni, billi jiġi ssostitwit għall-perijodu annwali, perijodu speċifiku li huwa itwal?
 (7)
 Fil-każ li waħda jew iktar mid-domandi 1 sa 5 tingħata risposta affermattiva: il-prinċipju ġenerali tad-dritt tal-Unjoni ta’ ċertezza legali u l-prinċipju ta’ non retroattività jimponu li tiġi limitata ratione temporis il-possibbiltà għall-persuni kkonċernati kollha li jistrieħu fuq l-interpretazzjoni, mogħtija mill-Qorti tal-Ġustizzja permezz tad-deċiżjoni preliminari adottata f’din il-proċedura, tad-dispożizzjonijiet tal-Artikolu 31 tal-Karta u tal-Artikolu 7(1) tad-Direttiva 2003/88/KE, sa fejn il-ġurisprudenza tal-ogħla qrati nazzjonali kienu minn qabel iddeċidew li d-dispożizzjonijiet rilevanti nazzjonali li jinsabu fil-liġi u l-ftehim kollettiv ma jistgħux ikunu suġġetti għal interpretazzjoni tad-dritt tal-Unjoni? Jekk il-Qorti tal-Ġustizzja tagħti risposta negattiva għal din id-domanda: huwa kompatibbli mad-dritt tal-Unjoni li qrati nazzjonali jipproteġu, abbażi tad-dritt nazzjonali, l-aspettattivi leġittimi ta’ persuni li jimpjegaw li straħu fuq iż-żamma tal-ġurispdudenza tal-ogħla qrati nazzjonali, jew il-protezzjoni tal-aspettattivi leġittimi hija riżervata biss għall-Qorti tal-Ġustizzja?
 (1) Direttiva 2003/88/KE tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill, tal-4 ta’ Novembru 2003, li tikkonċerna ċerti aspetti tal-organizzazzjoni tal-ħin tax-xogħol (ĠU Edizzjoni Speċjali bil-Malti, Kapitolu 5, Vol. 4, p. 381).