type: legislation

jurisdiction: EU

text:
 Tärkeä oikeudellinen huomautus
 |
 52005SC0898
 Luonnos ETA:n sekakomitean päätös yhteistyöstä muilla kuin neljän vapauden alaan kuuluvilla erityisalueilla tehdyn ETA-sopimuksen pöytäkirjan 31 muuttamisesta - Luonnos yhteisön yhteiseksi kannaksi - /* SEK/2005/0898 lopull. */
 Bryssel 4.7.2005SEK(2005) 898 lopullinenLuonnosETA:N SEKAKOMITEAN PÄÄTÖSyhteistyöstä muilla kuin neljän vapauden alaan kuuluvilla erityisalueilla tehdyn ETA-sopimuksen pöytäkirjan 31 muuttamisesta- Luonnos yhteisön yhteiseksi kannaksi -(komission esittämä) PERUSTELUT1. ETA-sopimuksen pöytäkirjaan 31 sisältyy erityismääräyksiä yhteisön ja ETA:n EFTA-valtioiden yhteistyöstä muilla kuin neljän vapauden alaan kuuluvilla erityisalueilla.2. Oheisen ETA:n sekakomitean päätösluonnoksen tarkoituksena on muuttaa pöytäkirja 31 tietoyhteiskuntaan liittyvän yhteistyön laajentamiseksi. Siinä luodaan puitteet yhteistyölle 1 päivästä tammikuuta 2005 ja vahvistetaan yksityiskohtaiset säännöt ETA:n EFTA-valtioiden täysipainoiselle osallistumiselle yhteisön ohjelmiin ja toimiin kyseisellä alalla:- 32005 D 0456: Euroopan parlamentin ja neuvoston päätös N:o 456/2005/EY, tehty 9 päivänä maaliskuuta 2005, digitaalisen sisällön saatavuuden, käytettävyyden ja hyödynnettävyyden parantamista Euroopassa koskevasta monivuotisesta yhteisön ohjelmasta (eContentplus).3. Euroopan talousalueesta tehdyn sopimuksen soveltamista koskevista yksityiskohtaisista säännöistä annetun neuvoston asetuksen (EY) N:o 2894/94 1 artiklan 3 kohdan a alakohdan mukaan neuvosto vahvistaa komission ehdotuksesta yhteisön kannan tällaisiin päätöksiin.4. ETA:n sekakomitean päätösluonnos annetaan neuvoston hyväksyttäväksi, ja hyväksynnän saatuaan komissio esittää yhteisön kannan ETA:n sekakomiteassa mahdollisimman pian.ETA:N SEKAKOMITEAN PÄÄTÖSyhteistyöstä muilla kuin neljän vapauden alaan kuuluvilla erityisalueilla tehdyn ETA-sopimuksen pöytäkirjan 31 muuttamisestaETA:N SEKAKOMITEA, jokaottaa huomioon Euroopan talousalueesta tehdyn sopimuksen, sellaisena kuin se on muutettuna Euroopan talousalueesta tehdyn sopimuksen tarkistamisesta tehdyllä pöytäkirjalla, jäljempänä ’sopimus’, ja erityisesti sen 86 ja 98 artiklan,sekä katsoo seuraavaa:1. Sopimuksen pöytäkirja 31 muutettiin ... päivänä ...kuuta ... tehdyllä ETA:n sekakomitean päätöksellä N:o .../...[1].2. On aiheellista laajentaa sopimuspuolten yhteistyö digitaalisen sisällön saatavuuden, käytettävyyden ja hyödynnettävyyden parantamista Euroopassa koskevasta monivuotisesta yhteisön ohjelmasta (eContentplus) 9 päivänä maaliskuuta 2005 tehdyn Euroopan parlamentin ja neuvoston päätöksen N:o 456/2005/EY[2] alalle.3. Sopimuksen pöytäkirja 31 olisi tämän vuoksi muutettava, jotta tämä laajennettu yhteistyö voitaisiin aloittaa 1 päivänä tammikuuta 2005,ON PÄÄTTÄNYT SEURAAVAA:1 artiklaLisätään sopimuksen pöytäkirjassa 31 olevan 2 artiklan 5 kohtaan luetelmakohta seuraavasti:”- 32005 D 0456: Euroopan parlamentin ja neuvoston päätös N:o 456/2005/EY, tehty 9 päivänä maaliskuuta 2005, digitaalisen sisällön saatavuuden, käytettävyyden ja hyödynnettävyyden parantamista Euroopassa koskevasta monivuotisesta yhteisön ohjelmasta (eContentplus) (EUVL L 79, 24.3.2005, s. 1).”.2 artiklaTämä päätös tulee voimaan seuraavana päivänä sen jälkeen, kun viimeinen sopimuksen 103 artiklan 1 kohdan mukainen ilmoitus on tehty ETA:n sekakomitealle.*Sitä sovelletaan 1 päivästä tammikuuta 2005.3 artiklaTämä päätös julkaistaan Euroopan unionin virallisen lehden ETA-osastossa ja ETA-täydennysosassa.Tehty Brysselissä [...].ETA:n sekakomitean puolestaPuheenjohtaja ETA:n sekakomitean sihteerit [1] EUVL L ...[2] EUVL L 79, 24.3.2005, s. 1.* [Valtiosäännön asettamista vaatimuksista ei ole ilmoitettu.] [Valtiosäännön asettamat vaatimukset on ilmoitettu.]


type: caselaw

text:
 25.9.2004
 HU
 Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja
 C 239/12
 AZ ELSŐFOKÚ BÍRÓSÁG ÍTÉLETE
 2004. július 8-án
 a T-44/00. sz. Mannesmannröhren-Werke AG kontra Európai Közösségek Bizottsága ügyben (1)
 (Versenyjog - Megállapodás - Hegesztés nélküli acélcsövek piaca - A jogsértés tartama - Bírság)
 (2004/C 239/24)
 Az eljárás nyelve: német
 A T-44/00. sz. Mannesmannröhren-Werke AG, székhelye: Mühlheim an der Ruhr (Németország), képviseli: M. Klusmann ügyvéd, kézbesítési cím: Luxembourg, kontra Európai Közösségek Bizottsága (meghatalmazott: M. Erhart és A. Whelan, kézbesítési cím: Luxembourg) ügyben az EK-Szerződés 81. cikkét alkalmazó eljárással (IV/E-1/35.860-B. sz. ügy – Hegesztés nélküli acélcsövek) (HL 2003., L 140., 1. o.) kapcsolatos, 1999. december 8-i 2003/382/EK bizottsági határozat megsemmisítésére, illetve másodlagosan a kérelmezőre kirótt bírság mérséklésére irányuló kérelem tárgyában az Elsőfokú Bíróság (második tanács), tagjai: N. J. Forwood, elnök, J. Pirrung és A. W. H. Meij, bírák; hivatalvezető: J. Plingers tisztviselő, 2004. július 8-án meghozta ítéletét, amelynek rendelkező része a következő:
 1)
 Az EK-Szerződés 81. cikkét alkalmazó eljárással (IV/E-1/35.860-B. sz. ügy – Hegesztés nélküli acélcsövek) kapcsolatos, 1999. december 8-i 2003/382/EK bizottsági határozat 1. cikkének (2) bekezdését megsemmisíti annyiban, amennyiben az e rendelkezés által megállapított jogsértést 1991. január 1-je előtt a kérelmező terhére rója.
 2)
 A 2003/382. sz. határozat 4. cikkében a kérelmezőre kiszabott bírság összegét 12 600 000 euróban állapítja meg.
 3)
 A keresetet ezt meghaladóan elutasítja.
 4)
 A kérelmező, illetve a Bizottság költségeiket maguk viselik.
 (1) HL C 135., 2000.5.13.


text:
 26.6.2013
 SL
 Uradni list Evropske unije
 L 173/38
 IZVEDBENA UREDBA KOMISIJE (EU) št. 614/2013
 z dne 25. junija 2013
 o določitvi standardnih uvoznih vrednosti za določitev uvozne cene za nekatere vrste sadja in zelenjave
 EVROPSKA KOMISIJA JE –
 ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije,
 ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1234/2007 z dne 22. oktobra 2007 o vzpostavitvi skupne ureditve kmetijskih trgov in o posebnih določbah za nekatere kmetijske proizvode (Uredba o enotni SUT) (1),
 ob upoštevanju Izvedbene uredbe Komisije (EU) št. 543/2011 z dne 7. junija 2011 o določitvi podrobnih pravil za uporabo Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1234/2007 za sektorja sadja in zelenjave ter predelanega sadja in zelenjave (2) ter zlasti člena 136(1) Uredbe,
 ob upoštevanju naslednjega:
 (1)
 Izvedbena uredba (EU) št. 543/2011 na podlagi izida večstranskih trgovinskih pogajanj urugvajskega kroga določa merila, po katerih Komisija določi standardne vrednosti za uvoz iz tretjih držav za proizvode in obdobja iz dela A Priloge XVI k tej uredbi.
 (2)
 Standardna uvozna vrednost se izračuna vsak delovni dan v skladu s členom 136(1) Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 543/2011 ob upoštevanju spremenljivih dnevnih podatkov. Zato bi morala ta uredba začeti veljati na dan objave v Uradnem listu Evropske unije –
 SPREJELA NASLEDNJO UREDBO:
 Člen 1
 Standardne uvozne vrednosti iz člena 136 Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 543/2011 so določene v Prilogi k tej uredbi.
 Člen 2
 Ta uredba začne veljati na dan objave v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
 Ta uredba je v celoti zavezujoča in se neposredno uporablja v vseh državah članicah.
 V Bruslju, 25. junija 2013
 Za Komisijo V imenu predsednika
 Jerzy PLEWA
 Generalni direktor za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja
 (1) UL L 299, 16.11.2007, str. 1.
 (2) UL L 157, 15.6.2011, str. 1.
 PRILOGA
 Standardne uvozne vrednosti za določitev uvozne cene za nekatere vrste sadja in zelenjave
 (EUR/100 kg)
 Tarifna oznaka KN
 Oznaka tretje države (1)
 Standardna uvozna vrednost
 0702 00 00
 MK
 49,2
 TR
 98,7
 ZZ
 74,0
 0707 00 05
 MK
 27,7
 TR
 116,3
 ZZ
 72,0
 0709 93 10
 MA
 102,6
 TR
 127,8
 ZZ
 115,2
 0805 50 10
 AR
 97,3
 BR
 96,4
 TR
 78,7
 ZA
 103,0
 ZZ
 93,9
 0808 10 80
 AR
 165,4
 BR
 114,4
 CL
 130,5
 CN
 96,0
 NZ
 144,5
 US
 156,1
 ZA
 124,6
 ZZ
 133,1
 0809 10 00
 IL
 342,4
 TR
 214,9
 ZZ
 278,7
 0809 29 00
 TR
 340,7
 ZZ
 340,7
 0809 30
 TR
 179,1
 ZZ
 179,1
 0809 40 05
 CL
 216,3
 IL
 308,9
 ZA
 377,0
 ZZ
 300,7
 (1) Nomenklatura držav, določena v Uredbi Komisije (ES) št. 1833/2006 (UL L 354, 14.12.2006, str. 19). Oznaka „ZZ“ predstavlja „druga porekla“.


text:
 3.3.2015
 SK
 Úradný vestník Európskej únie
 L 58/64
 VYKONÁVACIE NARIADENIE KOMISIE (EÚ) 2015/330
 z 2. marca 2015,
 ktorým sa ustanovujú paušálne dovozné hodnoty na určovanie vstupných cien niektorých druhov ovocia a zeleniny
 EURÓPSKA KOMISIA,
 so zreteľom na Zmluvu o fungovaní Európskej únie,
 so zreteľom na nariadenie Európskeho parlamentu a Rady (EÚ) č. 1308/2013 zo 17. decembra 2013, ktorým sa vytvára spoločná organizácia trhov s poľnohospodárskymi výrobkami, a ktorým sa zrušujú nariadenia Rady (EHS) č. 922/72, (EHS) č. 234/79, (ES) č. 1037/2001 a (ES) č. 1234/2007 (1),
 so zreteľom na vykonávacie nariadenie Komisie (EÚ) č. 543/2011 zo 7. júna 2011, ktorým sa ustanovujú podrobné pravidlá uplatňovania nariadenia Rady (ES) č. 1234/2007, pokiaľ ide o sektory ovocia a zeleniny a spracovaného ovocia a zeleniny (2), a najmä na jeho článok 136 ods. 1,
 keďže:
 (1)
 Vykonávacím nariadením (EÚ) č. 543/2011 sa v súlade s výsledkami Uruguajského kola mnohostranných obchodných rokovaní ustanovujú kritériá, na základe ktorých Komisia stanovuje paušálne hodnoty na dovoz z tretích krajín, pokiaľ ide o výrobky a obdobia uvedené v časti A prílohy XVI k uvedenému nariadeniu.
 (2)
 Paušálne dovozné hodnoty sa vypočítajú každý pracovný deň v súlade s článkom 136 ods. 1 vykonávacieho nariadenia (EÚ) č. 543/2011, pričom sa zohľadnia premenlivé každodenné údaje. Toto nariadenie by preto malo nadobudnúť účinnosť dňom jeho uverejnenia v Úradnom vestníku Európskej únie,
 PRIJALA TOTO NARIADENIE:
 Článok 1
 Paušálne dovozné hodnoty uvedené v článku 136 vykonávacieho nariadenia (EÚ) č. 543/2011 sú stanovené v prílohe k tomuto nariadeniu.
 Článok 2
 Toto nariadenie nadobúda účinnosť dňom jeho uverejnenia v Úradnom vestníku Európskej únie.
 Toto nariadenie je záväzné v celom rozsahu a priamo uplatniteľné vo všetkých členských štátoch.
 V Bruseli 2. marca 2015
 Za Komisiu
 v mene predsedu
 Jerzy PLEWA
 generálny riaditeľ pre poľnohospodárstvo a rozvoj vidieka
 (1) Ú. v. EÚ L 347, 20.12.2013, s. 671.
 (2) Ú. v. EÚ L 157, 15.6.2011, s. 1.
 PRÍLOHA
 Paušálne dovozné hodnoty na určovanie vstupných cien niektorých druhov ovocia a zeleniny
 (EUR/100 kg)
 Číselný znak KN
 Kód tretej krajiny (1)
 Paušálna dovozná hodnota
 0702 00 00
 EG
 120,8
 MA
 80,4
 TR
 106,5
 ZZ
 102,6
 0707 00 05
 JO
 253,9
 TR
 182,6
 ZZ
 218,3
 0709 93 10
 MA
 81,4
 TR
 200,0
 ZZ
 140,7
 0805 10 20
 EG
 46,1
 IL
 73,0
 MA
 44,4
 TN
 56,8
 TR
 71,0
 ZZ
 58,3
 0805 50 10
 TR
 50,1
 ZZ
 50,1
 0808 10 80
 BR
 68,8
 CL
 94,5
 MK
 26,7
 US
 180,1
 ZZ
 92,5
 0808 30 90
 AR
 132,9
 CL
 166,7
 CN
 99,9
 US
 122,7
 ZA
 95,3
 ZZ
 123,5
 (1) Nomenklatúra krajín stanovená nariadením Komisie (EÚ) č. 1106/2012 z 27. novembra 2012, ktorým sa vykonáva nariadenie Európskeho parlamentu a Rady (ES) č. 471/2009 o štatistike Spoločenstva o zahraničnom obchode s nečlenskými krajinami, pokiaľ ide o aktualizáciu nomenklatúry krajín a území (Ú. v. EÚ L 328, 28.11.2012, s. 7). Kód „ZZ“ znamená „iného pôvodu“.


type: wikipedia

text:
De Dorpskerk, bijgenaamd De Peperbus, is een achtzijdige koepelkerk aan de Delftsekade bij het historische centrum van de Nederlandse plaats Leidschendam.
 Gebouw
 Na zeven jaar bouwen werd de kerk in 1653 in gebruik genomen. Architect was Arent van 's-Gravesande, bekend geworden in 1636 na de bouw van het huidige Haags Historisch Museum. De achtkantige kerk kreeg een halfronde koepel en een klokkenstoel met koepeltje. De hoogheemraadschappen Delfland en Rijnland en de steden Delft, Dordrecht, Gouda, Haarlem en Leiden schonken ieder een gebrandschilderd raam.
 In 1693 brandde de kerk af. Hij werd in dezelfde stijl door Jacob Roman herbouwd, gefinancierd door onder meer loterijgelden.
 In 1865 veranderde het uiterlijk van de kerk, Tijdens een restauratie werd het koepeldak van de kerk en het kleine koepeltje van de klokkenstoel vervangen door een schuine kap, waardoor de kerk aanzienlijk hoger werd. De ingang van de kerk kreeg een uitwendig portaal.
 Interieur
 Het interieur van de kerk is sober en intiem door de achtzijdige vorm. De preekstoel en de herenbank dateren uit 1893, toen de kerk na de brand herbouwd werd.
 Orgel
 Het eerste orgel was gemaakt door Louwer. Vermoedelijk was het orgel een schenking, want in de archieven van de kerk is alleen terug te vinden dat bij de in gebruikname op 30 maart 1807 een borrel werd geschonken. Voordien werd er gezongen met een voorzanger.
 In 1845 werd het eerste orgel vervangen door een kabinetorgel, dat de Hervormde Gemeente voor 750 gulden kocht was bij pianomaker Van Ray in de Amsterdamse Kalverstraat. Het was een orgel uit 1793. In 1865 schonk prinses Marianne de gemeente 150 gulden om de houten frontpijpen te laten vervangen door tinnen frontpijpen.
 In 1896 werd door Van Gelder voor 1600 gulden een nieuw orgel geplaatst.
 Protestants kerkgebouw in Nederland
 Kerkgebouw in Leidschendam-Voorburg
 Rijksmonument in Leidschendam-Voorburg


type: other

jurisdiction: US

text: b" Office of Inspector General\n Corporation for National and\n Community Service\n\n\n\n\n AUDIT OF AN AMERICAN REINVESTMENT AND\n RECOVERY ACT GRANT AWARDED TO THE\n NEIGHBORHOOD REINVESTMENT CORPORATION\n\n OIG REPORT 10-18\n\n\n\n\n 1201 New York Ave, NW\n Suite 830\n Washington, DC 20525\n\n (202) 606-9390\n\n\n\n\nThis report was issued to Corporation management on September 3, 2010. Under\nthe laws and regulations governing audit follow-up, the Corporation is to make\nfinal management decisions on the report\xe2\x80\x99s findings and recommendations no\nlater than March 3, 2011 and complete its corrective actions by September 6,\n2011. Consequently, the reported findings do not necessarily represent the final\nresolution of the issues presented.\n\x0c Office of .Inspector General\n\n\n\n\n September 3, 2010\n\nTO: Paul Davis\n Acting Director, AmeriCorps*VISTA\n\n Margaret Rosenberry\n Director, Office of Grants Management\n\nFROM: Stuart Axenfeld/~ A~\n Assistant Inspector General for Audit\n\n\nSUBJECT: Office of Inspector General (OIG) Report 10-18: Audit of an American\n Reinvestment and Recovery Act Grant Awarded to the Neighborhood\n Reinvestment Corporation\n\nAttached is the final report on the OIG's audit of the American Reinvestment and Recovery Act\ngrant awarded to the Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation. This audit was performed by\nOIG staff in accordance with generally accepted government auditing standards.\n\nUnder the Corporation's audit resolution policy, a final management decision on the findings in\nthis report is due by March 3, 2011. Notice of final action is due by September 6, 2011.\n\nIf you have questions pertaining to this report, please contact me at (202) 606-9360 or\ns.axenfeld@cncsoig.gov; or Karen Gardner, Auditor, at (202) 606-9357 or\nk.qa rd ner@cncsoiq.gov.\n\nAttachment\n\ncc: Kenneth Wade, Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation (NRC), Chief Executive Officer\n Zewdneh Shiferaw, NRC, Controller\n Christina Deady, NRC, Manager Leadership Programs\n James Siegal, Chief of Staff\n Kristin McSwain, Chief of Program Operations\n William Anderson, Chief Financial Officer\n Mike Berning, Director of Field Liaison\n Bridgette Roy, Audit Resolution Coordinator\n Claire Moreno, Audit Liaison\n\n\n\n\n 1201 New York Avenue, NW * *\n Suite 830 Washington, DC 20525\n 202-606-9390 *Hotline: 800-452-8210* www.cncsoig.gov\n\n Senior Corps * AmeriCorps * Learn and Serve America\n\x0c CONTENTS\n\nSection Page\n\nExecutive Summary ........................................................................................................ 1\n\nResults of Audit ............................................................................................................... 2\n\nObjective, Scope, and Methodology ............................................................................... 7\n\nBackground ..................................................................................................................... 8\n\nExit Conference ............................................................................................................... 8\n\nAppendices\n\nA: National Reinvestment Corporation\xe2\x80\x99s Response to the Draft Report\nB: Corporation for National and Community Service\xe2\x80\x99s Response to the Draft Report\n\n GLOSSARY\n\nARRA American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009\n\nCME Content Matter Expert, NRC staff members providing content and information for\n the VISTA projects in community stabilization, foreclosure prevention, and financial\n fitness.\n\nFPAC Financial Planning Analysis and Contracts is a unit within NRC. Its internal policies\n and procedures are included in NeighborWorks-VISTA Program, Policies and\n Procedures Manual.\n\nGLA General Ledger Accounts that comprise NRC\xe2\x80\x99s chart of accounts.\n\nNHSC Neighborhood Housing Services of Cincinnati is 1 of the 240 organizations within\n NRC\xe2\x80\x99s network, and also 1 of the 7 subrecipients whose AmeriCorps*VISTA\n members the OIG interviewed.\n\nNRC Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation (d.b.a. NeighborWorks America)\n established by Congress in 1978, by the Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation\n Act.\n\nNWA NeighborWorks America (see NRC)\n\nNWO NeighborWorks Organization, any 1 of the 240 community-based organizations\n which are part of the national network known as the NeighborWorks network that\n comprises NeighborWorks America.\n\nOIG Office of Inspector General, Corporation for National and Community Service\n\nVISTA Volunteers in Service to America created by the Domestic Volunteer Service Act of\n 1973.\n\n\n i\n\x0c EXECUTIVE SUMMARY\n\nThe Office of Inspector General (OIG), Corporation for National and Community Service\n(Corporation), performed an audit of the National Reinvestment Corporation\xe2\x80\x99s (NRC)\nAmerican Reinvestment and Recovery Act (ARRA) grant. The objectives were to\ndetermine whether NRC\xe2\x80\x99s financial management system was in compliance with the\ngrant and ARRA requirements, and whether both NRC and Volunteers in Service to\nAmerica (VISTA) members were in compliance with applicable laws, regulations, and\ngrant provisions.\n\nThe audit disclosed that NRC\xe2\x80\x99s financial management system was in compliance with\nthe requirements of grant No. 09RVADC002, with emphasis on ARRA requirements.\nNRC and VISTA members were in compliance with, laws, regulations, and grant\nprovisions, except as discussed in Findings 1 and 2:\n\n 1. Employee time and attendance records were not always completed on time\n (Finding 1). Contrary to NRC policy and procedures, employees submitted\n timesheets as much as 30 days after the due date for submission and\n supervisory approval. At least one employee had not submitted a timesheet for\n at least two biweekly pay periods. Labor costs were not allocated to the project\n in a timely manner. As a result, ARRA project costs were understated in the\n General Ledger Account (GLA).\n\n 2. Neighborhood Housing Services of Cincinnati (NHSC), an NRC subrecipient was\n not in compliance with the VISTA program (Finding 2). NRC\xe2\x80\x99s monitoring of its\n subrecipients and supervision of its VISTA members did not detect that one of\n seven VISTA sponsors we tested, had not implemented a VISTA program, but\n had enrolled three VISTA members. NRC did not detect the lack of the\n members\xe2\x80\x99 participation in VISTA activities because it had not yet begun\n monitoring NHSC. Consequently, as of November 12, 2009, 54 days after\n enrollment, NHSC\xe2\x80\x99s VISTA members had completed up to 15 percent of their\n service term in non-VISTA activities.\n\n\nThis final version of the American Reinvestment and Recovery Act Grant Awarded to the\nNeighborhood Reinvestment Corporation audit report includes minor revisions to the\nwording included in the draft audit report.\n\n\n\n\n 1\n\x0c RESULTS OF AUDIT\n\nFinding 1. Time and attendance records were not always completed on time.\n\nThe approved budget for the VISTA Grant No. 09RVADC002 (ARRA Grant), included\n100 percent of the direct time of a supervisor and up to 10 percent of the direct time of\n3 Content Matter Experts (CMEs). Only one of these NRC employees consistently\nsubmitted his/her timesheet on time. To compound the problem, supervisory approval\nwas submitted up to 31 days after the due date. A review of timesheets submitted in\nDecember 2009 showed that, contrary to NRC policy and procedures, employees\nsubmitted timesheets as much as 30 days after the due date. At least one CME had not\nsubmitted a timesheet for at least two biweekly pay periods as of December 15, 2009.\nSupervisors were often significantly late in approving already late timesheets. Labor\ncosts were not allocated to the project until the employees\xe2\x80\x99 timesheets were approved\nand entered into the accounting system. As a result, ARRA project costs were\nunderstated and not included in the appropriate GLA in a timely manner. The table\nbelow illustrates the extent of overdue timesheets for the CMEs.\n\n Supervisor- Days Days Late\n Supervisor\n NRC Pay Period Approved Timesheet Submitted for\n Approved\nEmployee End Date Timesheet Submitted Late Approved\n Timesheet\n Due (Early) Timesheet\n\n 1 12/05/2009 12/14/2009 12/14/2009 0 12/15/2009 1\n 2 12/05/2009 12/14/2009 12/17/2009 3 12/23/2009 9\n 3 12/05/2009 12/14/2009 01/11/2010 28 01/13/2010 30\n 4 12/05/2009 12/14/2009 12/14/2009 0 01/07/2010 24\n\n 1 12/19/2009 12/28/2009 12/31/2009 3 01/02/2010 5\n 2 12/19/2009 12/28/2009 01/27/2010 30 01/28/2010 31\n 3 12/19/2009 12/28/2009 01/11/2010 14 01/24/2010 27\n 4 12/19/2009 12/28/2009 12/22/2009 (6) 01/07/2010 10\n\n 1 01/02/2010 01/11/2010 01/20/2010 9 01/20/2010 9\n 2 01/02/2010 01/11/2010 01/27/2010 16 01/28/2010 17\n 3 01/02/2010 01/11/2010 01/11/2010 0 01/24/2010 13\n 4 01/02/2010 01/11/2010 01/05/2010 (6) 01/07/2010 (4)\n\n\nWhile NRC policies and procedures provide for repeated warnings to employees that\nhave not submitted their timesheet, the policies and procedures lack consequences for\nemployees who do not submit timesheets or submit them late. The lack of\nconsequences when coupled with the fact that employees were paid whether or not\ntimesheets were submitted is an internal control weakness. The policies and procedures\nalso lack consequences for supervisors who do not take sufficient and timely action to\nvalidate timesheets.\n\nLack of timely preparation, submission, and review of timesheets can lead to incorrect\nrecording of time spent on each project because the memories of the employee and the\nsupervisor fade over time. In addition, the costs of VISTA projects will be understated in\n\n\n\n 2\n\x0cthe GLA and the Federal Financial Report for the grant until the timesheet data is\nrecorded.\n\nOMB Circular A-122 Cost Principles for Non-Profit Organizations, Attachment B\nParagraph 8. m. Support for salaries and wages, states:\n\n (1) Charges to awards for salaries and wages, whether treated as direct\n costs or indirect costs, will be based on documented payrolls approved by\n a responsible official(s) of the organization. The distribution of salaries\n and wages to awards must be supported by personnel activity reports, as\n prescribed in subparagraph 2, except when a substitute system has been\n approved in writing by the cognizant agency.\n\n (2) Reports reflecting the distribution of activity of each employee must\n be maintained for all staff members (professionals and nonprofessionals)\n whose compensations is charged, in whole or in part, directly to awards.\n In addition, in order to support the allocation of indirect costs, such\n reports must also be maintained for other employees whose work\n involves two or more functions or activities if a distribution of their\n compensation between such functions or activities is needed in the\n determination of the organization\xe2\x80\x99s indirect cost rate(s) (e.g., an employee\n engaged part-time in indirect cost activities and part-time in a direct\n function).\n\nNRC\xe2\x80\x99s NeighborWorks \xe2\x80\x93 VISTA Program Policies and Procedures Manual (10/2009),\nstates:\n\n Staff of NeighborWorks America complete bi-weekly time sheets via the\n \xe2\x80\x9cMoneyTime\xe2\x80\x9d system for time and expense reports. For expenses eligible\n under the grant award from CNS, the appropriate Fund/Contract code is\n used to designate those expenses. Otherwise, VISTA-related time or\n expenses are marked simply by Project/Task code as being part of\n NeighborWorks America\xe2\x80\x99s contribution to the VISTA program.\n\nAdditionally, NRC\xe2\x80\x99s Administrative Manual, Section 12 \xe2\x80\x93 Time and Expense Reports and\nPaychecks, states that \xe2\x80\x9ctime and expense reports [timesheets] are due no later than the\nninth day following the end of the previous pay period.\xe2\x80\x9d\n\nRecommendations:\n\nWe recommend that the Corporation ensure NRC:\n\n 1a. Add language to its current policies and procedures on the submission of\n timesheets by including and enforcing consequences for repeated late\n submissions and/or approvals to ensure timely submission and review, and\n\n 1b. Allocates labor costs to the project in a timely manner.\n\n\n\n\n 3\n\x0c NRC\xe2\x80\x99s Response\n\n NRC concurred with the finding and the related recommendations. It acknowledged the\n need to have and enforce consequences for repeated late submissions of time and\n attendance reports (timesheets). In addition, NRC has proposed changing the timesheet\n submission deadline from nine to five business days after the end of the pay period; and\n separating time reporting from the expense reimbursement module when its new\n Enterprise Resource Plan system is acquired and implemented.\n\n Corporation\xe2\x80\x99s Response\n\n The Corporation concurred with the finding and the related recommendations. The\n Corporation will ensure NRC adds language to its policies and procedures that will\n enforce consequences for repeated late submissions and/or approvals of timesheets.\n The Corporation will also ensure that NRC allocates labor costs charged to the grant in a\n timely manner.\n\n OIG Comments\n\n The planned actions proposed by NRC and the Corporation in their responses meet the\n intent of the recommendations.\n\n\nFinding 2. An NRC subrecipient was not in compliance with the\n AmeriCorps*VISTA program.\n\nNRC\xe2\x80\x99s monitoring of its subrecipients and supervising of its VISTA members did not\ndetect that Neighborhood Housing Services of Cincinnati (NHSC), one of seven VISTA\nsponsors we tested, had not implemented a VISTA program, but had enrolled three\nVISTA members. NRC did not detect the lack of the members\xe2\x80\x99 participation in VISTA\nactivities because it had not yet begun monitoring NHSC. Consequently, as of\nNovember 12, 2009, 54 days after enrollment, NHSC\xe2\x80\x99s VISTA members had completed\nup to 15 percent of their service term in non VISTA activities.\n\nMuch of NRC\xe2\x80\x99s oversight of members, including those at NHSC, is carried out by VISTA\nLeaders, who are also members. However, NRC only has only 3 Leaders to monitor\napproximately 150 members located at 60 subrecipient sites. We estimate that the cost\nof supporting NRC\xe2\x80\x99s VISTA Leaders is about $56,000, excluding stipends and education\nawards. The VISTA leader for NHSC had not yet interacted with the VISTA members or\nNHSC, as of November 12, 2009.\n\nNHSC representatives stated that they thought the grant was for a standard AmeriCorps\nprogram. This explanation is perplexing when one considers the information that NRC\nprovided to prospective applicants, including NHSC, and the information in NHSC\xe2\x80\x99s\napplication, which described VISTA activities.\n\nNHSC\xe2\x80\x99s lack of understanding of the VISTA program had the following impact:\n\n (1) NHSC\xe2\x80\x99s management, after notification by the auditor, was unsure how to\n most efficiently and effectively use its VISTA members. The organization\xe2\x80\x99s\n only option was to re-strategize the overall plan for the program.\n\n\n\n 4\n\x0c (2) One of the three VISTA members did not understand the difference between\n a regular AmeriCorps member and a VISTA member (e.g., direct vs. no\n direct service) when the member applied to the VISTA program.\n\n (3) One of the three VISTA members requested a transfer to the standard\n AmeriCorps service and was terminated as a result of not wanting to\n perform the duties of a VISTA member. This member preferred performing\n direct service, which was not an option of the VISTA program.\n\n (4) The VISTA members earned approximately eight weeks of service credit\n without participation in a planned VISTA effort that benefited the community.\n The activities of the VISTA members included assisting NHSC prepare for\n their annual Phone-A-Thon. During the period, they received credit towards\n earning an education award or stipend and received living allowances, and\n benefits, as summarized in the following table.\n\n As of 11/12/09 Member Benefit Multiplied by [C]\n\n Service Days of Percent of\n Term Service Service Annual Education Health\n (Days) Term Allowance Award Stipend Insurance Cost of\nMember [A] [B] [B \xc3\xb7 A = C] ($10,690) ($4,725) ($1,200) ($2,700) Service\n\n 1 365 54 15% $ 1,604 709 - 405 $ 2,718\n 2 365 54 15% 1,604 - 180 405 2,189\n 3 365 14 4% 410 - - 104 514\n $ 5,421\n\n\n Section II, paragraph 2(h) of the Memorandum of Agreement between the Corporation\n and NRC stated that NRC, as the sponsor, shall: \xe2\x80\x9cSupervise the AmeriCorps*VISTA\n members as described in the Project Narrative and paragraph 3 (\xe2\x80\x9cJoint Responsibilities\xe2\x80\x9d\n of this Part of the Agreement).\xe2\x80\x9d\n\n NRC\xe2\x80\x99s grant application (application ID 09RV100582) narrative shows that it intended to\n manage NHSC\xe2\x80\x99s and other subrecipient members through its VISTA Leaders, as\n follows:\n\n It is anticipated that approximately 150 VISTAs will be placed within\n specific markets and that these will be managed and coordinated toward\n cumulative outcomes/milestones through 3 VISTA Leaders placed\n strategically at NeighborWorks America headquarters and working closely\n with Initiatives' content experts whose work is directly related to the\n program and action plans of the VISTA members.\n\n Each VISTA Leader will work in close coordination with a senior content\n expert within the NeighborWorks Initiative linked to the program such as\n the Center for Foreclosure Solutions. NeighborWorks America will\n commission a seasoned Project Coordinator to manage and support the\n VISTA Leaders, and also offer support and coordination to the VISTA\n supervisors in the field. The entire program will be overseen by the\n Workforce Development Programs Manager, a key member of the\n\n\n\n 5\n\x0c NeighborWorks Training staff located in Washington, D.C. The team of\n NeighborWorks staff will devote expertise and coordination to ensuring\n successful outcomes for the VISTAs and communities served by the\n NWOs. Support will include collecting and distributing best practices,\n VISTAs coordination, and programmatic oversight. Ultimate outcomes\n include all the milestones as stated in the various individual sub\n applications.\n\n45 CFR \xc2\xa7 2543.51, Monitoring and reporting program performance., states in part,\n\xe2\x80\x9c(a) Recipients are responsible for managing and monitoring each project, program,\nsubaward, function or activity supported by the award.\xe2\x80\x9d\n\nThe Corporation\xe2\x80\x99s VISTA Program Guidance for the Fiscal Year 2009, page 9 \xe2\x80\x93\nCapacity Building states that \xe2\x80\x9cin order to build capacity, VISTAs do not perform direct\nservice.\xe2\x80\x9d Additionally, the guidance states that \xe2\x80\x9cdirect service does not refer to the\nintensity, difficulty, or the work-place of the tasks, but rather to the focus and nature of\nthe tasks.\xe2\x80\x9d\n\nRecommendations:\n\nWe recommend that the Corporation:\n\n 2a. Require NRC to reimburse the Corporation for the costs of service (member\n benefits) from NRC for the period in which its enrolled VISTA members did not\n perform VISTA activities; and\n\n 2b. Ensure NRC enhances its monitoring and supervising by managing its\n subrecipients and their VISTA members at the onset of member enrollment.\n\n NRC\xe2\x80\x99s Response\n\n NRC does not concur with the finding and with recommendation 2a; however, NRC\n agrees that monitoring should be taken very seriously and begun early in the\n program cycle. NRC believes that NHSC was compliant with the VISTA program\xe2\x80\x99s\n purpose and requirements. Because of the rapidity with which the program began,\n there was an initial lack of clarity. NRC said that when VISTA members arrived on\n site, NHSC understood VISTA requirements and was operating a VISTA program.\n NRC believes that (1) the supervisor attending Supervisor\xe2\x80\x99s Orientation; (2)\n approved Volunteer Activity Descriptions (VAD); (3) VISTA members attending pre-\n service orientation; and (4) NHSC VISTA supervisor\xe2\x80\x99s e-mail to CSO regarding a\n member\xe2\x80\x99s desire to perform direct service are all evidence that NHSC understood\n the VISTA program\xe2\x80\x99s purpose and requirements. NRC believes the auditor,\n incorrectly categorized NHSC\xe2\x80\x99s Phone-A-Thon as an unallowable activity even\n though the all-hands-on-deck activity of the Phone-A-Thon was explicitly approved\n by the Corporation.\n\n Corporation\xe2\x80\x99s Response\n\n The Corporation does not concur with this finding and will allow the questioned costs.\n The Corporation believes there was an initial lack of clarity related to allowable\n VISTA program activities. However, the Corporation State Office (CSO) and NRC\n\n\n 6\n\x0c worked with NHSC to define activities and understand the goals of the VISTA\n program. The Corporation stated proposed VISTA assignments were approved by\n the CSO and NRC prior to members beginning service. The Corporation also\n believes the interaction, communication, and monitoring NRC provided to\n subrecipients met VISTA requirements.\n\n OIG Comments\n\n We agree the activities of the Phone-A-Thon were allowable activities; however we\n are not convinced NHSC had a legitimate VISTA program in place when VISTA\n members arrived on site.\n\n On February 19, 2010, the auditor sent NRC and e-mail requesting information in\n order to finalize audit work related to NHOC1. The e-mail stated that during the\n auditor\xe2\x80\x99s meeting with the program director and NHOC's management \xe2\x80\x9cthey\n misunderstood the grant related to the VISTA members and that they thought that\n they were actually acquiring AmeriCorps members (direct service).\xe2\x80\x9d This statement\n was not disputed in NRC\xe2\x80\x99s response. The e-mail also stated that \xe2\x80\x9cNHOC's\n management indicated that they were not that familiar with the VISTA program\xe2\x80\x9d and\n the auditor asked if any informational meetings held with the NWOs that provided\n them with a background of the VISTA program. NRC stated that informational\n meetings were held for NWOs but did not indicate if NHOC specifically participated in\n the informational meetings.\n\n\n OBJECTIVE, SCOPE, AND METHODOLOGY\n\nWe conducted this audit in accordance with generally accepted government audit\nstandards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain\nsufficient, appropriate evidence to provide a reasonable basis for our findings and\nconclusions based on our audit objectives.\n\nThe objectives of this performance audit were to determine whether: (1) NRC\xe2\x80\x99s financial\nsystem is compliant with the requirements of the recovery grant awarded; (2) NRC,\nVISTA members, and the programs (sponsors and subrecipients) were compliant with\napplicable laws, regulations, and grant provisions; and internal controls related to the\nother objectives are effective. We conducted our audit between September 2, 2009, and\nMarch 26, 2010.\n\nOur scope included VISTA members that served in the period May 10, 2009 through\nMarch 26, 2010. The Corporation awarded NRC two grants that fall within the scope of\nthis audit: (1) Grant No. 09RVADC002, totaling $236,507, for supervision and\ntransportation expenses; and (2) Grant No. 09VHADC001, which is a VISTA no-cost\narrangement. It provides for NRC to administer a project aimed at building capacity of\ncommunity development nonprofit organizations around the country to reduce\nforeclosures, and strengthen communities affected by foreclosures.\n\n\n1\n In an e-mail dated June 23, 2010 NRC acknowledged that for the purpose of this audit report\nNeighborhood Housing of Cincinnati (NHOC), Neighborhood Housing Services of Cincinnati\n(NHSC) and the Home Ownership Center of Greater Cincinnati are the same organization. (E-42)\n\n\n 7\n\x0cThe Corporation awarded 60 VISTA-member grants, at no cost (known as zero-dollar\ngrants) to NRC\xe2\x80\x99s subrecipients. Our selection process, convenience sampling, did not\nuse any specific characteristics in the selection of a particular subrecipient for testing.\nWe selected a sample of seven subrecipients to perform additional audit procedures.\nThese subrecipients were in San Diego, CA (3 VISTAs); Tampa, FL (1 VISTA); Silver\nSpring, MD (2 VISTAs); Cincinnati, OH (3 VISTAs); New Orleans, LA (2 VISTAs);\nChicago, IL (8 VISTAs); and Great Falls, MT (2 VISTAs). We interviewed the staff and\nall VISTA members who were serving at the subrecipients we tested.\n\n\n BACKGROUND\n\nAmeriCorps*VISTA is an anti-poverty program that provides full-time volunteers to\nnonprofit organizations and local agencies that serve low-income communities. The\nmission of the AmeriCorps*VISTA program is to create and expand programs that bring\nlow-income individuals and communities out of poverty. The VISTA program is strongly\naligned with Administration and Congressional priorities in the American Recovery and\nReinvestment Act of 2009 (Recovery Act).\n\nNRC (d.b.a. NeighborWorks\xc2\xae America) was established by Congress in 1978 in the\nNeighborhood Reinvestment Corporation Act. The purpose of the NRC is to continue\nthe joint efforts of the Federal financial supervisory agencies and the Department of\nHousing and Urban Development in promoting reinvestment in older neighborhoods by\nlocal financial institutions in cooperation with the community, residents, and local\ngovernments. These efforts were previously conducted by the Urban Reinvestment\nTask Force.\n\n\n EXIT CONFERENCE\n\nWe provided a discussion draft of this report and conducted an exit conference with\nCorporation and NRC representatives on March 26, 2010. The Corporation\xe2\x80\x99s and NRC\xe2\x80\x99s\nresponses to the draft report were summarized after each recommendation and are\nincluded, in their entirety, in Appendices A and B of this report.\n\n\n\n\n 8\n\x0c APPENDIX A\nNational Reinvestment Corporation\xe2\x80\x99s Response to the Draft Report\n\x0c 1325 G Street, NW, Suite 800\n Washington, DC 20005\n\n\n Tel (202) 220-2300\n Fax (202) 376-2600\n http://www.nw.org\n\n\n\n\nJune 4, 2010\n\n\nMr. Stuart Axenfeld\nAssistant Inspector General for Audit\nOffice of Inspector General\nCorporation for National & Community Service\n1201 New York Avenue NW, Suite 830\nWashington, DC 20525\n\nDear Mr. Axenfeld:\n\nI am writing in response to the Office of the Inspector General\xe2\x80\x99s draft report on Audit of an American\nReinvesment and Recovery Act Grant Awarded to the Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation (NRC). Thank\nyou for the opportunity to comment on the report.\n\nFinding 1: Time and attendance records were not always completed on time.\nWe concur with Finding 1 and Recommendations 1a and 1b. As mentioned and documented during\nthe audit process, we already have in place a number of auto-reminders and other procedures and\nprotocols to encourage timely submission of time and expense reports. Yet we recognize that more\ncan be done to enforce consequences for repeated late submissions. It has been a focus of our\nefforts in recent years to ensure timely submission while complying with relevant laws. In addition\nto those recommendations from your reports, we have gone even further by proposing to our\ncorporate Officers the following:\n\n \xe2\x80\xa2 Change the timesheet submission date from 9 to 5 business days after the pay period; and\n \xe2\x80\xa2 Separate time reporting from the expense reimbursement module when the new Enterprise\n Resource Plan system is acquired and implemented, a process that is already underway.\n\nFinding 2: An NRC subrecipient was not in compliance with the AmeriCorps*VISTA\nprogram.\nIn this case, we disagree with the auditor\xe2\x80\x99s conclusion in Finding 2 and, as a result, disagree with\nRecommendation 2a. NHS of Cincinnati (NHSC) was in compliance with the VISTA program\npurpose and requirements. While there may have been some early lack of clarity on the part of\nNHSC because of the rapidity with which this program began, it was very clear by the time the\nVISTA members arrived on site that NHSC understood VISTA requirements and was operating a\nVISTA program.\n\x0cNHSC staff demonstrated in multiple ways their understanding of the VISTA program and\nallowable activities very early in the VISTAs\xe2\x80\x99 service and communicated that to their VISTA\nmembers. The supervisor had been to Supervisor\xe2\x80\x99s Orientation (SO) and the Volunteer Activity\nDescriptions (VADs) which described appropriate VISTA activities had been approved by the\nCNCS State Office. In addition, members had been to Pre-Service Orientation (PSO); had been\ntrained on the purpose and requirements of the VISTA program; and had reviewed their program\nactivities. They took the oath of service on the final day of the PSO before beginning their work at\nNHSC. Therefore, when they began their service at NHSC they were directed to and engaged in\nVISTA-appropriate, capacity-building activities from their first day on site.\n\nThe VISTA Volunteer Activity Descriptions\xe2\x80\x94the main document used to describe the work that\nthe VISTAs will engage in\xe2\x80\x94outlined appropriate, capacity-building activities for the VISTAs\xe2\x80\x99 duties.\nThese documents guide the day-to-day work of VISTA members. They were submitted to CNCS\nfor review and approved by CNCS prior to the PSO. At the PSO, participants reviewed and became\nvery familiar with their VADs. While individuals who applied for positions as VISTAs may have\nhad some misconceptions about the program before they were accepted and attended orientation,\nby the time they completed their PSO they understood the extent of their allowable duties. It was\nalso clear that NHSC would not permit direct service work beyond what is allowable.\n\nOn the second day of service (September 22, 2009), the NHSC VISTA program supervisor sent an\ne-mail to CNCS State Office staff and to NRC\xe2\x80\x99s program manager regarding one of the VISTA\nmembers, stating that, \xe2\x80\x9cShe has requested to be trained to do direct service work including counseling customers. I\nexplained that those functions would not be possible. We also discussed what capacity building entailed. \xe2\x80\xa6 Prior to\nthis, we have had multiple conversions (sic) discussing what type of work she would be doing here.\xe2\x80\x9d This clearly\ndemonstrates that both the supervisor and the VISTA member understood the restriction on direct\nservice work and the need for capacity-building activities from the beginning of service.\n\nWe believe the auditor\xe2\x80\x99s misconception about the activities may have occurred because the VISTA\nmembers were engaged in a phonathon shortly before the auditor\xe2\x80\x99s visit. However, any direct\nservice associated with that event for that short timeframe was explicitly approved by the CNCS\nState Office. It was an \xe2\x80\x9call-hands-on-deck\xe2\x80\x9d event in which the entire organization was also engaged.\nIt would have been disruptive and inefficient for the VISTAs to be otherwise engaged; it aided the\nVISTA members\xe2\x80\x99 understanding of the organization and its work; and it provided awareness and\nskills that would be useful to the VISTA members\xe2\x80\x99 organizational capacity-building work.\n\nWe agree with Recommendation 2b. NRC takes its monitoring responsibilities very seriously and\nearly in the program had already begun monitoring NHSC\xe2\x80\x99s work, including:\n\n \xe2\x80\xa2 Ensuring that all NHSC VISTA members attended the Pre-Service Orientation in\n September and that the VISTA supervisor attended the Supervisors\xe2\x80\x99 Orientation in June;\n \xe2\x80\xa2 Requesting, receiving and reviewing the NHSC VADs;\n\x0c \xe2\x80\xa2 Processing the Memorandum of Agreement signed by NHSC;\n \xe2\x80\xa2 Communicating with NHSC with instructional e-mails, teleconferences and recorded\n webinars for all NeighborWorks VISTA supervisors and members that included\n information about direct service versus capacity-building and other important tips and\n guidelines; and\n \xe2\x80\xa2 Responding to questions and interacting with NHSC staff, including the aforementioned\n e-mail from NHSC to NRC and CNCS on September 22 (the VISTA members\xe2\x80\x99 second\n day of service).\n\nWe believe strongly that the investment made by CNCS in these VISTA volunteers was sound and\nappropriate, with an excellent return on the investment for the Corporation and for the community.\nThe VISTA program has been a tremendously positive experience for the participating\nNeighborWorks organizations and for the VISTA members. We are thrilled to be partnering with\nCNCS on this program and we look forward to continuing to grow these impacts through the years.\n\nThe first year of the program was a time of learning and infrastructure development at NRC and it\nhas also been a time of great accomplishments at the community level. We appreciate the input that\nhas been provided via the audit process.\n\nAgain, thank you for the opportunity to comment on the report. If you have any questions or\ncomments, please do not hesitate to contact me.\n\nSincerely,\n\n\n\n\nKenneth D. Wade\nChief Executive Officer\n\x0c APPENDIX B\nCorporation for National and Community Service\xe2\x80\x99s Response to Draft Report\n\x0c NATIONAL&!\n COMMUNITY\n SERVICEr.IWIoool::l\n\n June 4,2010\n\n\nTO: Stuart Axenfeld\n Assistant Inspect~\n or f6enenl flJA~it\nFROM: PauIDavis 'l / (11fA--\n ~ector, ~4ffSTA __\n\n ~~ ~~k\n Director ffiee f GTants Manage~\n\nCC: William Anderson, CFO for Finance\n Frank Trinity, General Counsel\n Bridgette Roy, Audit Resolution\n Tina Dunphy, Ohio State Program Director\n\nSUBJECT: Response to OIG Draft of an American Reinvestment and Recovery Act\n Grant Awarded to the Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation\n\n\nThank you for the opportunity to review the draft report on the Corporation's American\nReinvestment and Recovery Act grant awarded to the Neighborhood Reinvestment\nCorporation. The Corporation reviewed the OIG report, met with the OIG Audit\nManager and the grantee and reviewed the NRC response to the report. We are\naddressing all draft findings at this time. If the DIG concurs with our decisions, the\nCorporation will complete confirmation of corrective action within 90 days after the audit\nissue date.\n\nFinding 1: Time and attendance records were not always completed on time.\n\nThe auditors recommend that the Corporation ensure that NRC:\n\nla. Adds language to its current policies and procedures on the submission of timesheets\nby including and enforcing consequences for repeated late submissions and/or approvals\nto ensure timely submission and review; and\n1b. Allocates labor costs to the project in a timely manner.\n\nCorporation Response: The Corporation agrees with the finding and recommendations\nand will ensure that NRC adds language to its current policies and procedures on the\nsubmission of timesheets as recommended. We will also ensure NRC allocates labor\ncosts to be charged to the CNCS grant in a timely manner and confirm corrective action\nis complete by August 31, 2010.\n\n\n 1201 New York Avenue, NW *\n Washington, DC 20525\n USA~3~.=.\n 202-606-5000 *\n www.nationalservice.org\n Freedom Corps\n Senior Corps * AmeriCorps * Learn and Serve America The President's Call to Service\n\x0cFinding 2: An NRC sub recipient was not in compliance with the AmeriCorps\nVISTA program.\n\nThe auditors recommend that the Corporation:\n\n2a. Require NRC to reimburse the Corporation for the costs of service (member benefits)\nfrom NRC for the period in which its enrolled VISTA members did not perform VISTA\nactivities; and\n2b. Ensure NRC enhances its monitoring and supervising by managing its sub recipients\nand their VISTA members at the onset of enrollment.\n\nCorporation response: We do not agree with the auditor's finding that one of NRC's\nsubrecipients, Neighborhood Housing Services of Cincinnati (NHSC), had not\nimplemented a VISTA program. Because the organization had operated an AmeriCorps\nStatelNational program and was applying for VISTA members for the first time, there\nmay have been some initial lack of clarity related to allowable VISTA program activities\ncompared to AmeriCorps StatelNational. However, by the time the Corporation State\nOffice and NRC worked with NHSC staff to define activities and understand the goals of\nthe VISTA program, the designed activities met requirements for the VISTA program.\nThe proposed activities and VISTA assignments were approved by both NRC and the\nCorporation's State Office staff and in place before members began their service.\nMembers received and reviewed the description of the planned activities at Pre-Service\nOrientation from September 15-18, 2009, and understood their responsibilities.\n\nAs noted in the NRC response to the audit, NRC staff interacted frequently with NHSC in\nthe months before the members began service to review program activities, to ensure staff\nattended VISTA program training and members attended pre-service orientations, and to\ncommunicate program requirements. This interaction and on-going monitoring and\ncommunication meets VISTA requirements. Therefore, the Corporation allows the\nquestioned costs and no further corrective action is required related to this finding.\n\x0c"


text:
 17.7.2017
 NL
 Publicatieblad van de Europese Unie
 C 231/36
 Beroep ingesteld op 12 mei 2017 — Le Pen/Parlement
 (Zaak T-284/17)
 (2017/C 231/45)
 Procestaal: Frans
 Partijen
 Verzoekende partij: Marion Le Pen (Saint-Cloud, Frankrijk) (vertegenwoordiger: M. Ceccaldi, advocaat)
 Verwerende partij: Europees Parlement
 Conclusies
 —
 nietigverklaring van besluit 2016/2295 (IMM) van het Europees Parlement van 2 maart 2017 betreffende het verzoek tot opheffing van de immuniteit van Marine Le Pen;
 —
 veroordeling van het Europees Parlement tot betaling aan Marine Le Pen van het bedrag van 35 000 EUR als vergoeding van de geleden immateriële schade;
 —
 veroordeling van het Europees Parlement tot betaling aan Marine Le Pen van het bedrag van 5 000 EUR als terugbetaling van de invorderbare kosten;
 —
 verwijzing van het Europees Parlement in alle kosten van de procedure.
 Middelen en voornaamste argumenten
 Ter ondersteuning van haar beroep voert de verzoekende partij vier middelen aan.
 1.
 Eerste middel: schending van artikel 8 van Protocol nr. 7 betreffende de voorrechten en immuniteiten van de Europese Unie (hierna: „Protocol”). Dit middel bestaat uit vier onderdelen.
 —
 Het eerste onderdeel is ontleend aan de omvang van de in artikel 8 van het Protocol bedoelde immuniteit.
 —
 Het tweede onderdeel is ontleend aan het voorwerp van de in artikel 8 van het Protocol bedoelde immuniteit.
 —
 Het derde onderdeel is ontleend aan de traditionele bescherming door het Parlement van de in artikel 8 van het Protocol bedoelde immuniteit.
 —
 Het vierde onderdeel is ontleend aan schending van de in artikel 8 van het Protocol bedoelde immuniteit van Marine Le Pen.
 2.
 Tweede middel: schending van artikel 9 van het Protocol. Dit middel bestaat uit drie onderdelen.
 —
 Het eerste onderdeel is ontleend aan het voorwerp van artikel 9 van het Protocol.
 —
 Het tweede onderdeel is ontleend aan de onjuiste rechtsopvatting van het Europees Parlement gelet op de opheffing van de immuniteit van Marine Le Pen.
 —
 Het derde onderdeel is ontleend aan het feit dat het besluit tot opheffing van de immuniteit in strijd zou zijn met de onafhankelijkheid van Marine Le Pen en de instelling.
 3.
 Derde middel: schending van de beginselen van gelijke behandeling en behoorlijk bestuur. Dit middel bestaat uit twee onderdelen.
 —
 Het eerste onderdeel is ontleend aan de ongelijke behandeling van Marine Le Pen in vergelijking tot vergelijkbare situaties, en aan schending van het beginsel van gelijke behandeling.
 —
 Het tweede onderdeel is ontleend aan het feit dat het bestreden besluit een duidelijk geval van fumus persecutionis is, en een schending vormt van het beginsel van behoorlijk bestuur.
 4.
 Vierde middel: schending van de rechten van de verdediging.


type: contracts

text:
 Tärkeä oikeudellinen huomautus
 |
 22009A0520(01)
 Bulgarian tasavallan ja Romanian osallistumisesta niiden Euroopan unioniin liittymisen johdosta sopimuspuolina Euroopan yhteisön ja sen jäsenvaltioiden sekä Sveitsin valaliiton väliseen henkilöiden vapaasta liikkuvuudesta tehtyyn sopimukseen liitettävä pöytäkirja
 Virallinen lehti nro L 124 , 20/05/2009 s. 0053 - 0062
 Bulgarian tasavallan ja Romanian osallistumisesta niiden Euroopan unioniin liittymisen johdosta sopimuspuolina Euroopan yhteisön ja sen jäsenvaltioiden sekä Sveitsin valaliiton väliseen henkilöiden vapaasta liikkuvuudesta tehtyyn sopimukseen liitettäväpöytäkirjaEUROOPAN YHTEISÖ,jota edustaa Euroopan unionin neuvosto, jaBELGIAN KUNINGASKUNTA,BULGARIAN TASAVALTA,TŠEKIN TASAVALTA,TANSKAN KUNINGASKUNTA,SAKSAN LIITTOTASAVALTA,VIRON TASAVALTA,IRLANTI,HELLEENIEN TASAVALTA,ESPANJAN KUNINGASKUNTA,RANSKAN TASAVALTA,ITALIAN TASAVALTA,KYPROKSEN TASAVALTA,LATVIAN TASAVALTA,LIETTUAN TASAVALTA,LUXEMBURGIN SUURHERTTUAKUNTA,UNKARIN TASAVALTA,MALTA,ALANKOMAIDEN KUNINGASKUNTA,ITÄVALLAN TASAVALTA,PUOLAN TASAVALTA,PORTUGALIN TASAVALTA,ROMANIA,SLOVENIAN TASAVALTA,SLOVAKIAN TASAVALTA,SUOMEN TASAVALTA,RUOTSIN KUNINGASKUNTA,ISON-BRITANNIAN JA POHJOIS-IRLANNIN YHDISTYNYT KUNINGASKUNTA,jäljempänä "jäsenvaltiot", joita myös edustaa Euroopan unionin neuvosto,sekäSVEITSIN VALALIITTO, jäljempänä "Sveitsi",jäljempänä "sopimuspuolet",jotkaOTTAVAT HUOMIOON Euroopan yhteisön ja sen jäsenvaltioiden sekä Sveitsin valaliiton välillä 21 päivänä kesäkuuta 1999 tehdyn sopimuksen henkilöiden vapaasta liikkuvuudesta, jäljempänä "sopimus", joka tuli voimaan 1 päivänä kesäkuuta 2002,OTTAVAT HUOMIOON Euroopan yhteisön ja sen jäsenvaltioiden sekä Sveitsin valaliiton väliseen henkilöiden vapaasta liikkuvuudesta 21 päivänä kesäkuuta 1999 tehtyyn sopimukseen liitetyn, 26 päivänä lokakuuta 2004 tehdyn pöytäkirjan Tšekin tasavallan, Viron tasavallan, Kyproksen tasavallan, Latvian tasavallan, Liettuan tasavallan, Unkarin tasavallan, Maltan tasavallan, Puolan tasavallan, Slovenian tasavallan ja Slovakian tasavallan osallistumisesta, niiden Euroopan unioniin liittymisen nojalla, sopimuspuolina kyseiseen sopimukseen, jäljempänä "vuoden 2004 pöytäkirja", joka tuli voimaan 1 päivänä huhtikuuta 2006,OTTAVAT HUOMIOON Bulgarian tasavallan ja Romanian, jäljempänä "uudet jäsenvaltiot", liittymisen Euroopan unioniin 1 päivänä tammikuuta 2007,KATSOVAT, ETTÄ uusista jäsenvaltioista tulee sopimuksen sopimuspuolia,KATSOVAT, ETTÄ Euroopan unionin neuvostolle annetaan liittymisasiakirjassa valtuudet tehdä jäsenvaltioiden puolesta pöytäkirja uusien jäsenvaltioiden liittymisestä sopimukseen,OVAT SOPINEET SEURAAVAA:1 artikla1. Uusista jäsenvaltioista tulee sopimuksen sopimuspuolia.2. Varsinaiseen sopimusosaan ja sen liitteeseen I tehdään seuraavat mukautukset:2 artiklaVarsinaiseen sopimusosaan ja sen liitteeseen I tehdään seuraavat mukautukset:1) Korvataan sopimuksen sopimuspuolten luettelo seuraavasti:"EUROOPAN YHTEISÖ,BELGIAN KUNINGASKUNTA,BULGARIAN TASAVALTA,TŠEKIN TASAVALTA,TANSKAN KUNINGASKUNTA,SAKSAN LIITTOTASAVALTA,VIRON TASAVALTA,IRLANTI,HELLEENIEN TASAVALTA,ESPANJAN KUNINGASKUNTA,RANSKAN TASAVALTA,ITALIAN TASAVALTA,KYPROKSEN TASAVALTA,LATVIAN TASAVALTA,LIETTUAN TASAVALTA,LUXEMBURGIN SUURHERTTUAKUNTA,UNKARIN TASAVALTA,MALTA,ALANKOMAIDEN KUNINGASKUNTA,ITÄVALLAN TASAVALTA,PUOLAN TASAVALTA,PORTUGALIN TASAVALTA,ROMANIA,SLOVENIAN TASAVALTA,SLOVAKIAN TASAVALTA,SUOMEN TASAVALTA,RUOTSIN KUNINGASKUNTA,ISON-BRITANNIAN JA POHJOIS-IRLANNIN YHDISTYNYT KUNINGASKUNTAsekäSVEITSIN VALALIITTO,".2) Muutetaan sopimuksen 10 artikla seuraavasti:a) lisätään 1 a kohdan jälkeen kohta seuraavasti:"1 b. Sveitsi voi jatkaa määrällisten rajoitusten soveltamista Sveitsissä palkkatyöntekijöinä ja itsenäisinä ammatinharjoittajina toimiviin Bulgarian tasavallan ja Romanian kansalaisiin kahden vuoden ajan Bulgarian tasavallan ja Romanian osallistumista sopimuspuolina tähän sopimukseen koskevan pöytäkirjan voimaantulosta lukien seuraavien kahden oleskelujakson osalta: yli neljä kuukautta mutta alle vuoden kestävät oleskelut ja vähintään vuoden kestävät oleskelut. Alle neljä kuukautta kestävään oleskeluun ei sovelleta määrällisiä rajoituksia.Sekakomitea tarkastelee uusien jäsenvaltioiden kansalaisiin sovellettavan siirtymäkauden toimivuutta Sveitsin toimittaman kertomuksen pohjalta ennen edellä mainitun siirtymäkauden päättymistä. Tarkastelun päätyttyä ja viimeistään edellä mainitun siirtymäkauden lopussa Sveitsi ilmoittaa sekakomitealle, aikooko se jatkaa määrällisten rajoitusten soveltamista Sveitsissä palkkatyöntekijöinä työskenteleviin henkilöihin. Sveitsi voi jatkaa mainittuja toimenpiteitä viiden vuoden ajan edellä mainitun pöytäkirjan voimaantulosta. Siirtymäkausi päättyy ensimmäisessä alakohdassa määritellyn kaksivuotiskauden lopussa, jos tällaista ilmoitusta ei tehdä.Tässä kohdassa määritellyn siirtymäkauden päättyessä kaikki Bulgarian tasavallan ja Romanian kansalaisiin sovellettavat määrälliset rajoitukset kumotaan. Näillä jäsenvaltioilla on oikeus soveltaa samoja määrällisiä rajoituksia Sveitsin kansalaisiin samoina ajanjaksoina.";b) lisätään 2 a kohdan jälkeen kohta seuraavasti:"2 b. Sveitsi sekä Bulgarian tasavalta ja Romania voivat jatkaa niiden alueella työskentelevien toisen sopimuspuolen työntekijöiden osalta tavanomaisille työmarkkinoille yhdentyneiden työntekijöiden ensisijaisuuden sekä toisen sopimuspuolen kansalaisiin sovellettavien palkka- ja työolojen tarkastamista kahden vuoden ajan Bulgarian tasavallan ja Romanian osallistumista sopimuspuolina tähän sopimukseen koskevan pöytäkirjan voimaantulosta lukien. Samoja tarkastuksia voidaan jatkaa niiden henkilöiden osalta, jotka tuottavat sopimuksen 5 artiklan 1 kohdassa tarkoitetuin tavoin palveluja seuraavilla neljällä alalla: puutarhanhoitopalvelut, rakennusala ja siihen liittyvät alat, turvatoimet, teollisuussiivous (NACE [*] koodit 01.41; 45.1–4; 74.60; 74.70). Edellä 1 b kohdassa sekä 2 b, 3 b ja 4 c kohdassa mainittuina siirtymäkausina Sveitsi asettaa työntekijät, jotka ovat uusien jäsenvaltioiden kansalaisia, työmarkkinoilleen pääsyssä etusijalle EU:n ja EFTAn ulkopuolisten maiden kansalaisiin nähden. Tavanomaisille työmarkkinoille yhdentyneiden työntekijöiden ensisijaisuuden tarkastamista ei sovelleta sellaisten palvelujen tarjoajiin, jotka on vapautettu sopimuspuolten välistä palvelujen tarjoamista koskevalla erityissopimuksella (mukaan lukien julkisten hankintojen alasta tehdyn sopimuksen palvelujen tarjoamista koskevat määräykset). Samalla ajanjaksolla voidaan säilyttää kelpoisuusvaatimukset alle neljän kuukauden oleskelun sallivien oleskelulupien [**] osalta ja niiden henkilöiden osalta, jotka tuottavat sopimuksen 5 artiklan 1 kohdan mukaisesti palveluja edellä mainituilla neljällä alalla.Sekakomitea tarkastelee tässä kohdassa käsiteltyjen siirtymätoimenpiteiden toimivuutta kunkin niitä toteuttavan sopimuspuolen laatiman kertomuksen pohjalta kahden vuoden kuluessa Bulgarian tasavallan ja Romanian osallistumista sopimuspuolina tähän sopimukseen koskevan pöytäkirjan voimaantulosta. Tarkastelun päätyttyä tai viimeistään kahden vuoden kuluttua edellä mainitun pöytäkirjan voimaantulosta tässä kohdassa määritellyt siirtymätoimenpiteet toteuttanut sopimuspuoli, joka on ilmoittanut sekakomitealle aikomuksestaan jatkaa siirtymätoimenpiteiden toteuttamista, voi edelleen jatkaa niiden toteuttamista viiden vuoden ajan edellä mainitun pöytäkirjan voimaantulosta. Siirtymäkausi päättyy ensimmäisessä alakohdassa määritellyn kaksivuotiskauden lopussa, jos tällaista ilmoitusta ei tehdä.Tässä kohdassa määritellyn siirtymäkauden päättyessä kaikki rajoitukset, jotka tässä kohdassa on mainittu, kumotaan.c) lisätään 3 a kohdan jälkeen kohta seuraavasti:"3 b. Bulgarian tasavallan ja Romanian osallistumista sopimuspuolina tähän sopimukseen koskevan pöytäkirjan tultua voimaan ja ennen 1 b kohdassa mainitun ajanjakson päättymistä Sveitsi varaa vuosittain (pro rata temporis -periaatteen mukaisesti) sen kolmansille maille varatusta kiintiöstä vähimmäismäärän uusia oleskelulupia [***] Sveitsissä palkkatyöntekijöinä ja itsenäisinä ammatinharjoittajina toimiville näiden uusien jäsenvaltioiden kansalaisille seuraavan aikataulun mukaisesti:Ajanjakso | Vähintään vuoden voimassa olevien lupien määrä | Yli neljä kuukautta mutta alle vuoden voimassa olevien lupien määrä |Ensimmäisen vuoden loppuun | 362 | 3620 |Toisen vuoden loppuun | 523 | 4987 |Kolmannen vuoden loppuun | 684 | 6355 |Neljännen vuoden loppuun | 885 | 7722 |Viidennen vuoden loppuun | 1046 | 9090 |d) lisätään 4 b kohdan jälkeen kohta seuraavasti:"4 c. Edellä 1 b kohdassa ja tässä kohdassa mainitun ajanjakson päättyessä Bulgarian tasavallan ja Romanian kansalaisiin sovelletaan tämän sopimuksen 10 artiklan 4 kohdan määräyksiä enintään kymmenen vuoden ajan näiden uusien jäsenvaltioiden osallistumista sopimuspuolina tähän sopimukseen koskevan pöytäkirjan voimaantulosta.Jos Sveitsin tai jonkin siirtymätoimenpiteitä toteuttaneen uuden jäsenvaltion työmarkkinoilla on vakavia häiriöitä tai vakavien häiriöiden uhka, ne ilmoittavat niistä sekakomitealle ennen 2 b kohdan 2 alakohdassa tarkoitetun viisivuotisen siirtymäkauden päättymistä. Tässä tapauksessa ilmoituksen tehnyt maa voi jatkaa 1 b, 2 b ja 3 b kohdassa kuvattujen menettelyjen soveltamista omalla alueellaan työskenteleviin työntekijöihin seitsemän vuoden ajan edellä mainitun pöytäkirjan voimaantulosta. Tällaisessa tapauksessa 1 b kohdassa mainittu vuosittain myönnettävien oleskelulupien määrä on seuraava:Ajanjakso | Vähintään vuoden voimassa olevien lupien määrä | Yli neljä kuukautta mutta alle vuoden voimassa olevien lupien määrä |Kuudennen vuoden loppuun | 1126 | 10457 |Seitsemännen vuoden loppuun | 1207 | 11664" |e) lisätään 5 a kohdan jälkeen kohta seuraavasti:"5 b. Tämän artiklan 1 b, 2 b, 3 b ja 4 c kohdan siirtymämääräyksiä ja erityisesti 2 b kohdan tavanomaisille työmarkkinoille yhdentyneiden työntekijöiden ensisijaisuutta sekä palkka- ja työolojen tarkastamista koskevia määräyksiä ei sovelleta palkkatyöntekijöihin ja itsenäisiin ammatinharjoittajiin, joilla on lupa harjoittaa taloudellista toimintaa sopimuspuolten alueella Bulgarian tasavallan ja Romanian osallistumista sopimuspuolina tähän sopimukseen koskevan pöytäkirjan voimaantuloajankohtana. Mainituilla henkilöillä on oikeus erityisesti ammatilliseen ja maantieteelliseen liikkuvuuteen.Alle vuoden voimassa olevan oleskeluluvan haltijoilla on oikeus uusia oleskelulupansa, eivätkä määrälliset rajoitukset koske heitä. Vähintään vuoden voimassa olevan oleskeluluvan haltijoilla on ilman eri toimenpiteitä oikeus jatkaa oleskelulupansa voimassaoloa. Tällaisilla palkkatyöntekijöillä ja itsenäisillä ammatinharjoittajilla on näin ollen edellä mainitun pöytäkirjan voimaantulosta lukien sopimuksen perusmääräysten ja erityisesti sen 7 artiklan nojalla samat vapaata liikkuvuutta koskevat oikeudet kuin sopimuspuolten alueelle sijoittautuneilla henkilöillä.".3) Korvataan sopimuksen liitteessä I olevan 27 artiklan 2 kohdan viittaus 10 artiklan 2, 2 a, 4 a ja 4 b kohtaan viittauksella 10 artiklan 2, 2 a, 2 b, 4 a, 4 b ja 4 c kohtaan.3 artiklaPoiketen siitä, mitä sopimuksen liitteessä I olevassa 25 artiklassa säädetään, sovelletaan tämän pöytäkirjan liitteessä 1 mainittuja siirtymäkausia.4 artikla1. Sopimuksen liite II muutetaan tämän pöytäkirjan liitteen 2 mukaisesti.2. Sopimuksen liitteen III mukautuksista päättää sopimuksen 14 artiklalla perustettu sekakomitea.5 artikla1. Tämän pöytäkirjan liitteet 1 ja 2 ovat sen erottamaton osa.2. Tämä pöytäkirja sekä vuoden 2004 pöytäkirja ovat erottamaton osa sopimusta.6 artikla1. Tämän pöytäkirjan ratifioivat tai hyväksyvät Euroopan unionin neuvosto jäsenvaltioiden ja Euroopan yhteisön puolesta ja Sveitsi omien menettelyjensä mukaisesti.2. Euroopan unionin neuvosto ja Sveitsi ilmoittavat toisilleen näiden menettelyjen saattamisesta päätökseen.7 artiklaTämä pöytäkirja tulee voimaan viimeisen ratifiointia tai hyväksymistä koskevan ilmoituksen antamispäivää seuraavan kuukauden ensimmäisenä päivänä.8 artiklaTämä pöytäkirja on voimassa yhtä kauan ja samoin ehdoin kuin sopimus.9 artikla1. Tämä pöytäkirja ja sen liitteinä olevat julistukset on laadittu kahtena kappaleena bulgarian, englannin, espanjan, hollannin, italian, kreikan, latvian, liettuan, maltan, portugalin, puolan, ranskan, romanian, ruotsin, saksan, slovakin, sloveenin, suomen, tanskan, tšekin, unkarin ja viron kielellä, ja kukin teksti on yhtä todistusvoimainen.2. Bulgarian ja romanian kielellä laadittu sopimus, sen liitteet ja pöytäkirjat sekä päätösasiakirja ovat yhtä todistusvoimaiset. Sopimuksen 14 artiklalla perustettu sekakomitea hyväksyy uusilla kielillä laadittavat todistusvoimaiset sopimustekstit.Съставено в Брюксел, на двадесет и седми май две хиляди и осма година.Hecho en Bruselas, el veintisiete de mayo de dos mil ocho.V Bruselu dne dvacátého sedmého května dva tisíce osm.Udfærdiget i Bruxelles den syvogtyvende maj to tusind og otte.Geschehen zu Brüssel am siebenundzwanzigsten Mai zweitausendacht.Kahe tuhande kaheksanda aasta maikuu kahekümne seitsmendal päeval Brüsselis.Έγινε στις Βρυξέλλες, στις είκοσι εφτά Μαΐου δύο χιλιάδες οκτώ.Done at Brussels on the twenty-seventh day of May in the year two thousand and eight.Fait à Bruxelles, le vingt-sept mai deux mille huit.Fatto a Bruxelles, addì ventisette maggio duemilaotto.Briselē, divtūkstoš astotā gada divdesmit septītajā maijā.Priimta du tūkstančiai aštuntų metų gegužės dvidešimt septintą dieną Briuselyje.Kelt Brüsszelben, a kétezer-nyolcadik év május havának huszonhetedik napján.Magħmul fi Brussell, fis- sebgħa u għoxrin jum ta' Mejju tas-sena elfejn u tmienja.Gedaan te Brussel, de zevenentwintigste mei tweeduizend acht.Sporządzono w Brukseli, dnia dwudziestego siódmego maja roku dwa tysiące ósmego.Feito em Bruxelas, em vinte e sete de Maio de dois mil e oito.Întocmit la Bruxelles, douăzeci și șapte mai două mii opt.V Bruseli dňa dvadsiateho siedmeho mája dvetisícosem.V Bruslju, dne sedemindvajsetega maja leta dva tisoč osem.Tehty Brysselissä kahdentenakymmenentenäseitsemäntenä päivänä toukokuuta vuonna kaksituhattakahdeksan.Som skedde i Bryssel den tjugosjunde maj tjugohundraåtta.За държавите-членкиPor los Estados miembrosZa členské státyFor medlemsstaterneFür die MitgliedstaatenLiikmesriikide nimelΓια τα κράτη μέληFor the Member StatesPour les États membresPer gli Stati membriDalībvalstu vārdāValstybių narių varduA tagállamok részérőlGħall-Istati MembriVoor de lidstatenW imieniu państw członkowskichPelos Estados-MembrosPentru statele membreZa členské štátyZa države članiceJäsenvaltioiden puolestaPå medlemsstaternas vägnar+++++ TIFF +++++За Европейската общностPor la Comunidad EuropeaZa Evropské společenstvíFor Det Europæiske FællesskabFür die Europäische GemeinschaftEuroopa Ühenduse nimelΓια την Ευρωπαϊκή ΚοινότηταFor the European CommunityPour la Communauté européennePer la Comunità europeaEiropas Kopienas vārdāEuropos bendrijos varduAz Európai Közösség részérőlGħall-Komunità EwropeaVoor de Europese GemeenschapW imieniu Wspólnoty EuropejskiejPela Comunidade EuropeiaPentru Comunitatea EuropeanăZa Európske spoločenstvoZa Evropsko skupnostEuroopan yhteisön puolestaFör Europeiska gemenskapen+++++ TIFF +++++Für die Schweizerische EidgenossenschaftPour la Confédération suissePer la Confederazione svizzera+++++ TIFF +++++[*] NACE: Euroopan yhteisön tilastollisesta toimialaluokituksesta 9 päivänä lokakuuta 1990 annettu neuvoston asetus (ETY) N:o 3037/90 (EYVL L 293, 24.10.1990, s. 1), asetus sellaisena kuin se on viimeksi muutettuna 29 päivänä syyskuuta 2003 annetulla Euroopan parlamentin ja neuvoston asetuksella (EY) N:o 1882/2003 (EUVL L 284, 31.10.2003, s. 1).[**] Työntekijät voivat hakea lyhytaikaisen oleskelun sallivia lupia tämän pöytäkirjan 3 b alakohdassa mainittujen kiintiöiden perusteella myös alle neljän kuukauden ajaksi.";[***] Nämä luvat myönnetään niiden sopimuksen 10 artiklassa mainittujen kiintiöiden lisäksi, jotka on varattu palkkatyöntekijöinä tai itsenäisinä ammatinharjoittajina toimiville henkilöille, jotka ovat niiden jäsenvaltioiden kansalaisia, jotka olivat jäsenvaltioita sopimuksen allekirjoitushetkellä ( 21 päivänä kesäkuuta 1999), sekä niiden jäsenvaltioiden kansalaisia, joista tuli tämän sopimuksen sopimuspuolia vuoden 2004 pöytäkirjalla. Nämä luvat myönnetään myös Sveitsin ja uusien jäsenvaltioiden voimassa olevissa kahdenvälisissä harjoittelijanvaihtosopimuksissa myönnettyjen lupien lisäksi.";--------------------------------------------------LIITE 1Siirtymätoimenpiteet maanhankinnan ja vapaa-ajanasunnon hankinnan osalta1. Bulgarian tasavaltaBulgarian tasavalta saa pitää voimassa viiden vuoden ajan tämän pöytäkirjan voimaantulosta pöytäkirjan allekirjoittamisajankohtana voimassa olevat lainsäädäntönsä rajoitukset, jotka koskevat Bulgarian ulkopuolella asuvien Sveitsin kansalaisten sekä Sveitsin lakien mukaan muodostettujen oikeushenkilöiden maanomistusoikeuksien hankintaa vapaa-ajanasuntoa varten.Bulgariassa laillisesti oleskeleviin Sveitsin kansalaisiin ei sovelleta edellisen alakohdan määräyksiä eikä muita kuin Bulgarian kansalaisiin sovellettavia sääntöjä ja menettelyjä.Bulgarian tasavalta saa pitää voimassa seitsemän vuoden ajan tämän pöytäkirjan voimaantulosta pöytäkirjan allekirjoittamisajankohtana voimassa olevat lainsäädäntönsä rajoitukset, jotka koskevat Sveitsin kansalaisten ja Sveitsin lakien mukaan muodostettujen oikeushenkilöiden maa- ja metsätalousmaan ja metsien hankintaa. Sveitsin kansalaisia ei saa missään tilanteessa maa- ja metsätalousmaan ja metsien hankinnassa kohdella epäedullisemmin kuin tämän pöytäkirjan allekirjoittamispäivänä eikä tiukemmin kuin kolmannen maan kansalaisia.Itsenäisiin viljelijöihin, jotka ovat Sveitsin kansalaisia ja jotka haluavat sijoittautua Bulgarian tasavaltaan ja asua siellä, ei sovelleta edellisen alakohdan määräyksiä eikä muita kuin Bulgarian tasavallan kansalaisiin sovellettavia menettelyjä.Näitä siirtymätoimenpiteitä koskeva yleinen uudelleentarkastelu tehdään kolmantena vuonna tämän pöytäkirjan voimaantulon jälkeen. Sekakomitea voi päättää ensimmäisessä alakohdassa mainitun siirtymäkauden lyhentämisestä tai sen päättämisestä.2. RomaniaRomania saa pitää voimassa viiden vuoden ajan tämän pöytäkirjan voimaantulosta pöytäkirjan allekirjoittamisajankohtana voimassa olevat lainsäädäntönsä rajoitukset, jotka koskevat Romanian ulkopuolella asuvien Sveitsin kansalaisten sekä sellaisten Sveitsin lakien mukaan muodostettujen yhtiöiden, jotka eivät ole asettautuneet Romaniaan tai joilla ei ole sivuliikettä tai edustustoa Romaniassa, maanomistusoikeuksien hankintaa vapaa-ajanasuntoa varten.Romaniassa laillisesti oleskeleviin Sveitsin kansalaisiin ei sovelleta edellisen alakohdan määräyksiä ei muita kuin Romanian kansalaisiin sovellettavia sääntöjä ja menettelyjä.Romania saa pitää voimassa seitsemän vuoden ajan tämän pöytäkirjan voimaantulosta pöytäkirjan allekirjoittamisajankohtana voimassa olevat lainsäädäntönsä rajoitukset, jotka koskevat Sveitsin kansalaisten ja sellaisten Sveitsin lakien mukaan muodostettujen yhtiöiden maa- ja metsätalousmaan ja metsien hankintaa, jotka eivät ole asettautuneet Romaniaan tai joilla ei ole sivuliikettä tai edustustoa Romaniassa. Sveitsin kansalaisia ei saa missään tilanteessa maa- ja metsätalousmaan ja metsien hankinnassa kohdella epäedullisemmin kuin tämän pöytäkirjan allekirjoittamispäivänä eikä tiukemmin kuin kolmannen maan kansalaisia.Itsenäisiin viljelijöihin, jotka ovat Sveitsin kansalaisia ja jotka haluavat sijoittautua Romaniaan ja asua siellä, ei sovelleta edellisen alakohdan määräyksiä eikä muita kuin Romanian kansalaisiin sovellettavia menettelyjä.Näitä siirtymätoimenpiteitä koskeva yleinen uudelleentarkastelu tehdään kolmantena vuonna tämän pöytäkirjan voimaantulon jälkeen. Sekakomitea voi päättää ensimmäisessä alakohdassa mainitun siirtymäkauden lyhentämisestä tai sen päättämisestä.--------------------------------------------------LIITE 2Muutetaan henkilöiden vapaasta liikkuvuudesta tehdyn, Euroopan yhteisön ja sen jäsenvaltioiden sekä Sveitsin valaliiton välisen sopimuksen liite II seuraavasti:1) Muutetaan sopimuksen liitteessä II olevan A osan 1 kohtaa otsikon "Tätä sopimusta sovellettaessa asetusta koskevat seuraavat mukautukset:" alla seuraavasti:a) lisätään liitteessä III olevaa A osaa koskevaan i kohtaan viimeisen merkinnän "Slovakia – Sveitsi" jälkeen seuraava:"Bulgaria – SveitsiEi mitään.Romania – SveitsiEi sopimusta.";b) lisätään liitteessä III olevaa B osaa koskevaan j kohtaan viimeisen merkinnän "Slovakia – Sveitsi" jälkeen seuraava:"Bulgaria – SveitsiEi mitään.Romania – SveitsiEi sopimusta.".2) Lisätään otsikon "A osa: Säädökset, joihin viitataan" 1 kohdassa "Asetus (ETY) N:o 1408/71" tekstinkohdan "304 R 631: Asetus (EY) N:o 631/2004 ..." jälkeen seuraava:"Tiettyjen asetusten ja päätösten mukauttamisesta tavaroiden vapaan liikkuvuuden, henkilöiden vapaan liikkuvuuden, yhtiöoikeuden, kilpailupolitiikan, maatalouden (eläinlääkintä- ja kasvinsuojelulainsäädäntö mukaan luettuna), liikennepolitiikan, verotuksen, tilastojen, energian, ympäristön, oikeus- ja sisäasioiden yhteistyön, tulliliiton, ulkosuhteiden, yhteisen ulko- ja turvallisuuspolitiikan sekä toimielinten aloilla Bulgarian ja Romanian liittymisen johdosta 20 päivänä marraskuuta 2006 annetun neuvoston asetuksen (EY) N:o 1791/2006 2 jakso (Henkilöiden vapaa liikkuvuus – sosiaaliturva), siltä osin kuin sen säännökset koskevat tämän sopimuksen liitteessä II tarkoitettuja yhteisön säädöksiä.".3) Lisätään otsikon "A osa: Säädökset, joihin viitataan" 2 kohdassa "Asetus (ETY) N:o 574/72" tekstinkohdan "304 R 631: Asetus (EY) N:o 631/2004 ..." jälkeen seuraava:"Tiettyjen asetusten ja päätösten mukauttamisesta tavaroiden vapaan liikkuvuuden, henkilöiden vapaan liikkuvuuden, yhtiöoikeuden, kilpailupolitiikan, maatalouden (eläinlääkintä- ja kasvinsuojelulainsäädäntö mukaan luettuna), liikennepolitiikan, verotuksen, tilastojen, energian, ympäristön, oikeus- ja sisäasioiden yhteistyön, tulliliiton, ulkosuhteiden, yhteisen ulko- ja turvallisuuspolitiikan sekä toimielinten aloilla Bulgarian ja Romanian liittymisen johdosta 20 päivänä marraskuuta 2006 annetun neuvoston asetuksen (EY) N:o 1791/2006 2 jakso (Henkilöiden vapaa liikkuvuus – sosiaaliturva), siltä osin kuin sen säännökset koskevat tämän sopimuksen liitteessä II tarkoitettuja yhteisön säädöksiä.".4) Lisätään otsikon "B osa: Säädökset, jotka sopimuspuolten on otettava aiheellisella tavalla huomioon" kohtiin "4.18. 383 D 0117: Päätös N:o 117...", "4.27. 388 D 64: Päätös N:o 136 ..." ja "4.37. 393 D 825: Päätös N:o 150..." tekstinkohdan "12003 TN 02/02 A: Tšekin tasavallan, Viron tasavallan, ..." jälkeen sekä kohtaan "4.77: Päätös N:o 192..." seuraava:"Tiettyjen asetusten ja päätösten mukauttamisesta tavaroiden vapaan liikkuvuuden, henkilöiden vapaan liikkuvuuden, yhtiöoikeuden, kilpailupolitiikan, maatalouden (eläinlääkintä- ja kasvinsuojelulainsäädäntö mukaan luettuna), liikennepolitiikan, verotuksen, tilastojen, energian, ympäristön, oikeus- ja sisäasioiden yhteistyön, tulliliiton, ulkosuhteiden, yhteisen ulko- ja turvallisuuspolitiikan sekä toimielinten aloilla Bulgarian ja Romanian liittymisen johdosta 20 päivänä marraskuuta 2006 annetun neuvoston asetuksen (EY) N:o 1791/2006 2 jakso (Henkilöiden vapaa liikkuvuus – sosiaaliturva), siltä osin kuin sen säännökset koskevat tämän sopimuksen liitteessä II tarkoitettuja yhteisön säädöksiä.".5) Työntekijöihin, jotka ovat Bulgarian tasavallan ja Romanian kansalaisia, sovelletaan liitteeseen II liitetyn pöytäkirjan "Työttömyysvakuutus"-jakson 1 kohdassa mainittuja järjestelyjä seitsemännen tämän pöytäkirjan voimaantuloa seuraavan vuoden loppuun.--------------------------------------------------


text:
Plankton je naziv grčkog porijekla i označava zajednicu živih organizama koji plutaju i ne raspolažu vidljivim sposobnostima za kretanje. Njihovo gibanje ovisi o gibanju vode. Organizme koji plutaju u vodi, ali mogu plivati i suprotno od vodenih strujanja naziva se još i nektonima.
 Životni okoliš
 Plankton je prisutan u gotovo svim vodama na Zemlji. Međutim, u većini morskih područja je prisutnost hranjivih tvari zanemariva, pa otuda je i količina planktona u njima vrlo mala i stoga se smatraju ekološkim pustinjama. Ako se u vodama stajaćicama ili rijekama nađe pretjerana količina hranjivih tvari, može se dogoditi da to dovede do suprotnog rezultata, naime, da fosfati, kao ograničavajući faktor prehrane planktona postane dominantan (kao otpadni produkt umjetnog gnojenja poljoprivrednih površina dospijeva oborinskom vodom u slatkovodne resurse na kopnu), i dovede do svoje suprotnosti i "zaguši" prirodnu cirkulaciju između planktona, vode i fosfata pa otuda i svi živi organizmi u vodi (i plankton) izgube neophodan kisik i uguše se. Slatkovodni plankton naziva se limnoplankton, a morski haliplankton.
 Veličina
 Plankton postoji u svim mogućim oblicima i veličinama. Posebno sitni organizmi (4-40 μm) ubrajaju se u nanoplankton. Najmanji oblici su bakterije, u jednu žličicu vode stalo bi ih 2 milijuna. Ali i veći predstavnici fitoplanktona su manji od presjeka ljudske kose. I zooplanktona ima sićušnih, ali i takvih koji mogu imati i do 9 metara, kao, recimo neke vrste meduza koje ne mogu aktivno plivati, nego samo plutaju sa strujom, i ubrajaju se isto u plankton.
 Razlikuju se:
 bakterijski plankton
 fitoplankton (biljni plankton)
 zooplankton (životinjski plankton)
 Zooplankton
 Prema dosadašnjim saznanjima, najveći dio životinjske biomase čini vrsta odnosno porodica kopepoda. Bez planktona arktičkih voda ne bi mogli postojati veliki kitovi usani, kao primjerice plavi kitovi ili kitovi perajari, njhova prehrambena podloga je upravo zooplankton kojeg "filtriraju" svojim usima. Velika jata riba također se hrane masom planktona.
 Fitoplankton
 Jednostanične alge kremenjašice čine najveći dio mase fitoplanktona. Prema novijim istraživanjima, čini se da je apsolutno najveća količina ugljičnog dioksida vezana u biljnom planktonu, a ne, kao što se ranije smatralo, u tropskim šumama.
 Životinje koje filtriraju plankton
 Plavi kit
 Kit perajar
 Kitopsina Rhincodon typus
 Divovska psina
 Flamingo
 Živi svijet
 Oceanografija
 Morski organizmi
 Ihtiologija


text:
 10.1.2009
 FI
 Euroopan unionin virallinen lehti
 C 6/44
 Virkamiestuomioistuimen tuomio (ensimmäinen jaosto) 4.11.2008 — Marcuccio v. komissio
 (Asia F-41/06) (1)
 (Henkilöstö - Virkamiehet - Sosiaaliturva - Tapaturma- ja ammattitautivakuutus - Työkyvyttömyys - Työkyvyttömyydestä johtuva siirto eläkkeelle - Perustelut - Kumoaminen)
 (2009/C 6/88)
 Oikeudenkäyntikieli: italia
 Asianosaiset
 Kantaja: Luigi Marcuccio (Tricase, Italia) (edustaja: asianajaja L. Garofalo)
 Vastaaja: Euroopan yhteisöjen komissio (asiamiehet: J. Currall ja C. Berardis-Kayser, avustajanaan asianajaja A. Dal Ferro)
 Oikeudenkäynnin kohde
 Yhtäältä komission tekemän kantajan työkyvyttömyyseläkkeelle siirtämistä koskevan päätöksen kumoaminen ja kyseiseen päätökseen liittyvien päätösten kumoaminen, ja toisaalta vahingonkorvausvaatimus
 Tuomiolauselma
 1)
 Kumotaan Euroopan yhteisöjen komission 30.5.2005 tekemä päätös siirtää L. Marcuccio työkyvyttömyyseläkkeelle.
 2)
 Euroopan yhteisöjen komissio velvoitetaan maksamaan L. Marcucciolle 3 000 euroa.
 3)
 Kanne hylätään muilta osin.
 4)
 Euroopan yhteisöjen komissio on vastattava omista oikeudenkäyntikuluistaan ja se velvoitetaan korvaamaan kaksi kolmasosaa L. Marcuccion kuluista.
 5)
 L. Marcuccio on vastattava omien oikeudekäyntikulujensa yhdestä kolmasosasta.
 (1) EUVL C 131, 3.6.2006, s. 54.


text:
 16.9.2010
 BG
 Официален вестник на Европейския съюз
 L 244/22
 РЕШЕНИЕ НА СЪВМЕСТНИЯ КОМИТЕТ НА ЕИП
 No 69/2010
 от 11 юни 2010 година
 за изменение на приложение IV (Енергетика) към Споразумението за ЕИП
 СЪВМЕСТНИЯТ КОМИТЕТ НА ЕИП,
 като взе предвид Споразумението за Европейското икономическо пространство, изменено с Протокола за адаптиране на Споразумението за Европейското икономическо пространство, наричано по-долу „Споразумението“, и по-специално член 98 от него,
 като има предвид, че:
 (1)
 Приложение IV към Споразумението бе изменено с Решение на Съвместния комитет на ЕИП No 140/2009 от 4 декември 2009 г. (1).
 (2)
 Регламент (ЕО) No 106/2008 на Европейския парламент и на Съвета от 15 януари 2008 г. относно програма на Общността за етикетиране на енергийната ефективност на офис оборудване (преработен вариант) (2) следва да бъде включен в споразумението.
 (3)
 Регламент (ЕО) No 106/2008 отменя Регламент (ЕО) No 2422/2001 на Европейския парламент и на Съвета (3), който е включена в Споразумението и следователно трябва да бъде отменен от Споразумението,
 РЕШИ:
 Член 1
 Приложение IV към Споразумението се изменя, както следва:
 1.
 Текстът на точка 18 (Регламент (ЕО) No 2422/2001 на Европейския парламент и на Съвета) се заличава:
 2.
 След точка 29 (Решение 2007/74/ЕО на Комисията) се добавя следната точка:
 „30.
 32008 R 0106: Регламент (ЕО) No 106/2008 на Европейския парламент и на Съвета от 15 януари 2008 г. относно програма на Общността за етикетиране на енергийната ефективност на офис оборудване (преработена версия) (ОВ L 39, 13.2.2008 г., стр. 1).
 За целите на настоящото споразумение разпоредбите на този регламент се четат със следните адаптации:
 а)
 Всяко позоваване на Споразумението между правителството на Съединените американски щати и Европейската общност относно координирането на програмите за обозначаване на енергийната ефективност на офис оборудването се разбира като включващо позоваване на обмена на писма между Агенцията за защита на околната среда (АЗОС) и Министерството на горивата и енергетиката на Норвегия, Министерството на промишлеността на Исландия и Службата за икономическа дейност на Лихтенщайн, с изключение на членове 11 и 14, при които остава позоваването на предишния.
 б)
 В член 4, параграф 5 думите „Общността и трети страни“ да се четат „държави от Общността или от ЕАСТ, от една страна, и трети страни, от друга“. Думите „тествани от Комисията или други държави-членки“ да се четат „тествани от Комисията или от държавите-членки, или от държавите от ЕАСТ, в рамките на съответните си области на компетентност,“.
 в)
 В член 12, параграф 3 в първото изречение думата „Комисия“ да се чете „държавите от ЕАСТ и Комисията, в рамките на съответните си области на компетентност“.
 г)
 Член 13 не се прилага.“
 Член 2
 Текстовете на Регламент (ЕО) No 106/2008 на исландски и норвежки език, които ще бъдат публикувани в притурката за ЕИП към Официален вестник на Европейския съюз, са автентични.
 Член 3
 Настоящото решение влиза в сила на 12 юни 2010 г., при условие че всички нотификации, предвидени в член 103, параграф 1 от Споразумението, са внесени в Съвместния комитет на ЕИП (4).
 Член 4
 Настоящото решение се публикува в раздела за ЕИП и в притурката за ЕИП към Официален вестник на Европейския съюз.
 Съставено в Брюксел на 11 юни 2010 година.
 За Съвместния комитет на ЕИП
 Председател
 Alan SEATTER
 (1) ОВ L 62, 11.3.2010 г., стр. 34.
 (2) ОВ L 39, 13.2.2008 г., стр. 1.
 (3) ОВ L 332, 15.12.2001 г., стр. 1.
 (4) Без отбелязани конституционни изисквания.


text:
 25.10.2008
 BG
 Официален вестник на Европейския съюз
 C 272/18
 Решение на Първоинстанционния съд от 9 септември 2008 г. — MyTravel/Комисия
 (Дело T-403/05) (1)
 (Достъп до документи - Регламент (ЕО) No 1049/2001 - Отказ за предоставяне на достъп - Изключение, свързано със защита процеса на вземане на решения - Изключение, свързано със защита на дейностите по разследване и одит - Изключение, свързано със защита на правните становища - Документи, свързани с решения на Комисията в областта на концентрациите)
 (2008/C 272/33)
 Език на производството: английски
 Страни
 Жалбоподател: MyTravel Group plc (Rochdale, Lancashire, Обединено Кралство) (представители: D. Pannick, QC, A. Lewis, barrister, M. Nicholson, S. Cardell и B. McKenna, solicitors)
 Ответник: Комисия на Европейските общности (представители: първоначално P. Hellström и P. Costa de Oliveira, впоследствие X. Lewis и P. Costa de Oliveira)
 Предмет
 Жалба за отмяна на Решение на Комисията от 5 септември 2005 г. (D(2005) 8461) и на Решение на Комисията от 12 октомври 2005 г. (D(2005) 9763), с които се отхвърля заявление на жалбоподателя за получаване на достъп до някои подготвителни документи по Решение 2000/276/EО на Комисията от 22 септември 1999 г. за обявяване на концентрация за несъвместима с Общия пазар и със Споразумението за ЕИО (преписка IV/M.1524 — Airtours/First Choice) (OВ L 93, 2000 г., стр. 1), както и до документи, изготвени от службите на Комисията вследствие на отмяната на това решение с Решение на Първоинстанционния съд от 6 юни 2002 г. по дело Airtours/Комисия (T-342/99, Recueil, стр. II-2585)
 Диспозитив
 1.
 Отменя Решение на Комисията от 5 септември 2005 г. (D(2005) 8461), доколкото с него се отказва достъп до работен документ, озаглавен „Протокол от разговор с член от екипа по преписка M.1524 Airtours/First Choice относно преписка Airtours, проведен на 24 юни 2002 г.“.
 2.
 Отхвърля жалбата в останалата й част.
 3.
 MyTravel Group plc понася девет десети от направените от него съдебни разноски и девет десети от съдебните разноски на Комисията.
 4.
 Комисията понася една десета от направените от нея съдебни разноски и една десета от съдебните разноски на MyTravel Group.
 (1) ОВ C 10, 14.1.2006 г.