OATHS OF ALLEGIANCE ACT

Hon. ERNEST LAPOINTE (Quebec East):: Mr. Speaker, with the unanimous consent of
TMr. Brown.]
the house I should like to move that item No. 38 on the order paper be struck off. My reason for doing this is that the hon. Secretary of State is introducing a bill which meets the purpose I had in view. He has kindly shown me a copy of the bill, and I am quite agreeable to it.
Bill withdrawn.



QUESTIONS

[Stage Direction]
(Questions answered orally are indicated by an asterisk.)

Mr. GARLAND (Bow River):: Are the chartered banks or any of them advertising for sale any part of the sixteen million dollars worth of Beauharnois bonds held by them as collateral security?


Mr. BENNETT:: Mr. Speaker, as far as the government is aware the chartered banks disposed of bonds to the extent of $15,000,000, par value, to a syndicate which made an offering to the public. Of the amount sold one-half was applied against the guarantee given by the government.


TRACADIE, N.B., LAZARETTO
Mr. VENIOT:: 1.	Were tenders called for the installation of an electric lighting plant in the lazaretto at Tracadie, New Brunswick?
2.	If so, when, and how many tenders were received?
3.	Who. were the tenderers and the amount of each tender entered at noon January 18, 1934?
4.	Who was the successful tenderer and the amount he tendered on January 18, 1934?


Mr. STEWART (Leeds):: 1.	Yes.
2.	(a) Tenders to be received not later than January 18, 1934; (b) Five tenders received.
3.	Northern Machine Works, Bathurst, N.B., $3,100; J. S. Parker, Saint John, N.B., $3,395; E. J. M. Bourgeois, Tracadie, N.B., $3,423; C. V. Clark, Saint John, N.B., $3,652; E. S. Stephenson & Co., Saint John, N.B., $4,675.
4.	(a) Northern Machine Works, Bathurst, N.B., (b) $3,100 (Date of tender January 15, 1934).


QUESTION PASSED AS ORDER FOR RETURN
Mr. GOTT:: 1. What were the total exports from Canada to Great Britain for the fiscal years ending March 31, 1921. 1922, 1923, 1924, 1925. 1926, 1927, 1928, 1929, 1930, 1931, 1932, 1933, 1934?

The Budget-Mr. Rhodes
2. What were the total imports from Great Britain to Canada during the foregoing years, naming major commodities and amounts?


MOTIONS FOR PAPERS
Mr. DUFF:: For a return of an itemized statement showing tile particular undertakings which make up the expenditure of $472,000 disclosed in the Auditor General's Report for 1933, Volume 2, M-8. for public works in Nova Scotia; also an itemized statement showing the particular undertakings which make up the expenditure of $390,000 disclosed in the Auditor General's Report for 1933, Volume 2, M-8, for trans-Canada highway.


GRANDE-ENTREE CHANNEL BUOYS
Mr. CHEVRIER (for Mr. Brasset):: For a copy of all correspondence and other documents exchanged between the Department of Marine, or the department's office at Charlottetown, and any persons of the Magdalen islands, county of Gaspe, respecting the buoys of Grande-Entree channel, from October, 1933, to date.


PEDIGREED HOGS
[Stage Direction]
On the orders of the day:
Mr. T. F. DONNELLY (Willow Bunch):: Mr. Speaker, I should like to ask a question of the government based on an article which appears in this morning's press. In a Canadian Press dispatch I notice that a question was asked in the British House of Commons as to why Canada was buying sixty or seventy pedigreed pigs from Sweden. Mr. Thomas said that all but eight of these pigs were not produced in England. I should like to ask the government if it can tell the house for whom the pigs are being bought, what their pedigrees may be, or any information they may have in that connection.


Richard Bedford Bennett: The hon. member's question will
stand as a notice. The minister is absent to-day.


THE BUDGET
Hon. E. N. RHODES (Minister of Finance) moved:: That Mr. Speaker do now leave the chair for the house to go into committee of ways and means.
He said:	Mr. Speaker, this year for the
first time in the course of this prolonged depression it is possible to review the year's operations in terms of business improvement, reviving confidence and expanding revenues.
Three successive budgets have been delivered in the face of a progressive decline in business with the inevitable disappointment in revenues and inability to meet necessary expenditures. Last year I expressed the belief that the turn in this tide had been reached and I ventured the hope that important developments which had occurred or were under way would lead to an early recovery of business activity. What was then a hope can now be asserted with confidence as a fact of experience. The fiscal year which has just closed has been a year of recovery- recovery that is unmistakable and of greater magnitude than many had thought possible.
The evidence of business recovery is written incontrovertibly in the recorded facts of our industry and trade. I desire not to weary you with statistical details but as a thorougn appraisal of current business conditions is an essential of sound budgeting and as depressiou psychology is still rather too prevalent, I propose to review the essential facts as briefly as possible.
The most comprehensive measure of economic activity in Canada is the index of the physical volume of business prepared by the Dominion Bureau of Statistics. It i3 based on a compilation involving forty-five economic factors, including production of our leading manufactured articles, mineral products, and electric power, as well as freight cars loaded, construction contracts awarded and the volume of trade. In February, 1933, when business reached its low point in Canada, that index stood at 67-0. In February, 1934, the latest month for which the figures are available, the index had risen to 86-4, an increase of no less than 29-0 per cent. During the same period, manufacturing production increased by 41-7 per cent, mineral production by 13-7 per cent and total industrial production, including construction, by 38 per cent. These figures are of striking significance when compared with similar figures for the United States. According to indices prepared by the Federal Reserve Board, the corresponding increases for that country were 31T per cent for manufacturing production, 15-2 per cent for mineral output and 28-6 per cent for total industrial production. Their improvement was considerably more rapid than ours last summer, but their gains were not consistently held; with us, recovery has been more gradual but also more persistent.
Other indices of a general nature tell the same story of business recovery in Canada. The total amount of cheques cashed at chartered banks in thirty-two clearing house centres increased 16 per cent in 1933 over 1932 and another 23 -i per cent in the first two

The Budget-Mr. Rhodes

months of the present year over the same period last year. These bank debit figures reflect not only the volume of ordinary business but also increasing activity in financial transactions.
In this power age, increasing sales of electrical energy are also an indication of general business expansion, although the increased use of electrical appliances or processes in home and factory and the increasing sales of secondary power for steam production make it impossible to regard power output as an accurate measure of such expansion. Since the first of this year, the output of central electric stations has established a new record level for all time. In February the average daily output was 57J million kilowatt hours, an increase of 24 T per cent over the corresponding month of 1933, and 19-8 per cent over February, 1929.
The increase in the movement of railway revenue freight is an even more significant symptom of general business improvement because it points to better days ahead for our two great railroad systems. In the first twelve weeks of this year 491,279 ears were loaded, showing an increase of 23-9 per cent over the same period last year. The gain of 95,064 cars in the elapsed period of the present year reflects a heavier movement in ten of the eleven commodity groups of the official classification, grain alone showing a slight decrease as compared with last year. Furthermore, traffic is now practically up to the level of the movement of two years ago.
Again comparing February, 1934, with February a year ago, we find the following striking increases in productive activity in individual industries; pig iron production, 100 per cent; steel production, 369 per cent; newsprint production, 38-9 per cent; imports of raw wool and yam, 143 per cent (in the textile industry imports of raw material are the best measure available of productive activity); raw cotton imports, 84-2 per cent; exports of boards and planks, 178-6 per cent; nickel exports 57-7 per cent; and construction contracts awarded, 72-8 per cent. During the past three months, contracts awarded, although still at a comparatively low level, were double the figure for the first quarter of last year. This improvement in the construction industry, which has been unduly depressed and which stimulates so many material manufacturing industries, is of special significance.
Expansion in the scale of operations should bring an enlargement of business profits if industry is operating on a sound basis. While the earnings of most business organizations during the past year were affected adversely

by the declining trend of the early part of the year, there is convincing confirmation of improvement for the year as a whole in the figures of company profits. A recent compilation of the latest earnings statements of 79 important companies showed that 64 reported net profits aggregating $61,500,000 after all charges, against $47,000,000 in the previous year, an increase of over 30 per cent, while the remaining 15 reduced their deficits from $8,600,000 to $7,100,000.
Of more importance is the effect of this expansion in private business upon the absorption of unemployment, the most pressing social problem of the depression years. In the twelve-month period ended on March 1, the index of employment rose from 76-9 to 92-7, an increase of 20-5 per cent. At the beginning of March returns from 8,499 leading employers showed 153,688 more employees on payrolls than were reported at the same date a year ago, and of this total, 114.214 represented increases in industries other than highway construction and maintenance, and, presumably therefore, have not been affected by governmental activity in connection with unemployment relief. On the basis of these returns from a limited group of employers it has 'been estimated that the total increase in employment in Canada during the year was at least 250,000.
There is one other economic factor upon which I wish to comment at this stage, namely, the movement of commodity prices. The world depression cannot be attributed to any single cause but with a very considerable measure of validity it may be interpreted in terms of the drastic fall in the world level of prices with consequent inevitable disparities in different groups of prices. The result was not only substantial inequalities as between various economic groups but a serious disequilibrium between costs and prices which impeded individual enterprise and threw the whole economic mechanism out of gear. Recovery from the depression may be measured by the progress made in reestablishing a reasonable equilibrium between the various parts of the price structure-a working equilibrium between producers' costs and prices, between prices of primary products and those of finished products, between wholesale and retail prices, and between debtors and creditors, whether they be individuals, corporations or countries. Such restoration of equilibrium may be achieved either by a reduction of costs or by a rise in the general level of prices, or by a combination of both tendencies. During any depression a gradual reduction of costs and a considerable amount of liquidation always takes place, and up to a certain point

The Budget-Mr. Rhodes
the working of these normal automatic forces is highly beneficial. But so catastrophic was the fall in prices from 1929 to 1933 and so rigid are certain elements of the price structure (such as interest, taxes, etc.) that reliance solely upon this method of curing our economic ills would have involved such a measure of deflation and liquidation as would possibly have imperilled the stability of our social and economic fabric.
For this reason the government has consistently pursued a policy designed to stimulate a rise in prices by every sound means. As Canada is so heavily interested in export trade it has been recognized that our most important need was to secure a rise in the world level of commodity prices. Consequently, at the Ottawa conference in 1932, at the World Monetary and Economic conference in London last summer and in the negotiations which followed and which led to the issue of a joint statement on monetary and economic policy by the nations of the British commonwealth, we did our utmost to secure the adoption of common policies designed to promote first a rise in, and later a stabilization of, the world level of commodity prices. For reasons which I need not discuss at this time it proved impossible to secure as great a measure of international cooperation and the employment of as aggressive policies as was thought desirable. Nevertheless, as I shall show later, such action as has been taken has not been without a considerable measure of success. But our efforts have not been limited to the international sphere. I shall have occasion later to refer to the steps we have taken and the success achieved in fostering within Canada a lowering of interest rates and ease in the money markets, which constitute essential conditions favourable to a rise in commodity prices. The inadequate machinery of our Finance Act has been administered as far as practicable with this end in view, and, as you are aware, we are proposing to set up a central bank which is designed to give us an effective mechanism for cooperating effectively with other countries in a program to raise and stabilize price levels, so far as may be possible within the scope of monetary action.
In October, 1931, an order in council was passed prohibiting the export of gold from Canada except under licence. That was the final step severing the chain which bound us to the gold standard currencies, then subject to deflationary tendencies. As you are aware, it was followed by a substantial decline in our foreign exchanges which improved the competitive position of, and the prices received by, our export industries, although at 74726-X44J
the same time it increased the burden involved in carrying our external obligations. Many have considered it unfortunate that, because of the more rapid depreciation of sterling, our currency, though at a substantial discount in New York, still remained at a premium in London. I had occasion last year to point out that in fluctuating about halfway between the United States dollar and the English pound, our dollar was working out probably the most practicable compromise between those of our national interests which would be benefited by close and stable relations with sterling, and those on the other hand which would be seriously harmed by a heavy and fluctuating discount in terms of New York. Fortunately, the developments during the past year in connection with these two basic currencies both of which affect our interests so materially have been of a nature extremely favourable to Canada. In February, 1933, sterling in Montreal was quoted at an average discount of 15-9 per cent; in February of this year there was an average premium of 4-3 per cent. In February, 1933, New York funds ruled at an average premium of 19-7 per cent, whereas in February this year this average premium had been reduced to %o of 1 per cent. During the last few days sterling has been quoted from 5-14 to 5T7 in Montreal and New York funds at a discount of i to i of 1 per cent. These rates of course mean that our exporters obtain a slight advantage in the British market and Canadian debtors are at no disadvantage in meeting their obligations payable in United States funds.
Much misunderstanding, however, seems to persist in connection with these highly technical matters of money and exchange. For instance, it is sometimes claimed that we should devalue our currency on the same basis as the United States have devalued theirs. This criticism appears to reveal a complete lack of appreciation of the fact that our dollar is currently selling on an approximate parity with that of the United States which has been devalued by slightly over 40 per cent. I have much sympathy with the desire for stabilization which may be latent in this argument, but in my view stabilization of our currency must await the establishment of a stabilized ratio, at least on a de facto basis, between the United States dollar and the English pound. So strongly are our interests tied up with both of these currencies that a policy of tying to one and not to the other would represent a poor second-best and not an ideal policy. I would have to qualify this general statement if either of these currencies should exhibit a deflationary tendency; that
The Budget-Mr. Rhodes

would involve a changed situation calling probably for a radically different decision.
In addition to these measures which have been taken to foster a rise in the general price level, I may add that the international wheat agreement which was signed at London is designed to effect by a better adjustment of supply and demand the price of wheat, which is so important a staple in our domestic economy and so important a constituent in the world price level. Our efforts to foster a rise in prices by every sound method will not be relaxed. In particular it is expected that our public works program will contribute to that end by accelerating the progress of business recovery already happily under way.
Granting that a rise in commodity prices is highly to be desired, the record of the past year has been distinctly favourable. From February, 1933, to February of this year the general index of wholesale prices in Canada rose by 13-4 per cent. This rise has been less rapid than that in the United States but more rapid than that of most other countries. The official index of the United States Bureau of Labour statistics is not yet available for the month of February, but the more rapidly fluctuating index compiled by Dun's shows a rise of 28-1 per cent during the period mentioned. In England wholesale prices have risen by 9-2 per cent according to the figures compiled by the Financial Times of London.
As an indication of the extent to which the maladjustments between various price groups have been corrected in Canada, I may add that while the wholesale price index was rising 13-4 per cent, the index for farm prices rose by no less than 34-9 per cent. Furthermore, the prices of raw and partly manufactured articles showed a rise of 23-8 per cent, as compared with one of 11-4 per cent for fully and chiefly manufactured commodities. It should be noted also that the price of Number 1 Northern wheat at Fort William averaged 43-2 per cent higher in February this year than in February, 1933, while the corresponding increase for cattle (steers, good 1,000 to 1,200 lbs.) was 45-7 per cent, and for bacon hogs at Toronto, 153-8 per cent.
I have referred to the steps which have been taken to promote a lowering of interest rates. Interest is one of the rigid factors in our price structure and the burden of fixed charges caused by the extravagant borrowing of the war and post-war years, aggravated enormously as it has been by the fall in prices, and for public bodies also by the necessarily large expenditures for unemployment relief during the depression, has been too frequently discussed in this house to need elaboration here.
fMr. Rhodes.]
For certain individual debtors the burden has become unbearable and the government proposes to bring down at an early stage legislation designed to provide machinery whereby farmers who find themselves unable to pay the fixed charges on their outstanding debts will be able by an expeditious and inexpensive process to work out compromises with their creditors and to obtain new working capital. The guiding principle of this legislation will be to secure for the farmer a simplified debt structure reduced in size -to a point where the carrying charges will be within the capacity of the farm enterprise to pay. This will involve some concessions on the part of creditors but these will be more than outweighed by the advantages which will follow as a result of retaining the farmer on the land as a willing and effective producer. The release of economic energy so produced and the substitution of hope and goodwill for despondency and discontent which are now prevalent in certain areas should result in a very real gain to our whole domestic economy.
The claim has been made that a somewhat similar procedure should be applied to certain classes of public debt in this country. This question was effectively dealt with in the statement made by the Prime Minister in this house a few weeks ago and is too large and complicated a subject to call for more than a passing reference by me at this time. But as I have outlined our proposals for dealing with farm debts, I wish to make clear why in my opinion the same kind of remedy cannot be applied to the problem of public indebtedness.
In the first place is the fact that so large a proportion of the direct and guaranteed debt of the dominion and the provinces is held by foreign investors. Not only that but, as a result of the method of financing in the post-war years a very large proportion of these foreign and of domestic holdings is in the form of bearer bonds payable at the option of the holder in either two or three markets. It is therefore impracticable, if not indeed entirely impossible, to administer a policy that would seek to differentiate between the Canadian and the foreign investor. Whatever argument may be advanced in favour of a comprehensive policy of scaling down all fixed charges due by Canadian debtors to Canadian creditors-and this would involve, what is too frequently overlooked, a reduction in payments to be made by as well as to Canadian creditor institutions such as insurance companies, mortgage companies, trust companies and banks-I doubt whether there are many Canadians who would be willing to contemplate a program which would involve

The Budget-Mr. Rhodes
even a partial repudiation of our external obligations. In addition to our traditional attitude towards the carrying out of our obligations according to the letter of the contract, there is the compelling motive of self-interest. Canada is a young country with a vast store of natural resources that has only begun to be tapped. If we are to convert those potential resources into consumable wealth and thus into a higher standard of living for our people, we will need the fructifying influence of foreign capital for years to come. We have a right to expect that our foreign creditors will not make it difficult or impossible for us to pay our interest and maturing debt obligations but, unless I am seriously mistaken, this country will never take any deliberate action that would cut off or seriously impede the flow of foreign capital for the development of our resources.
The second consideration I wish to place before you is that great as is the burden of our public debt, it is not beyond the capacity of our people to pay. I am sure you will grant that I am in a position to appreciate to the full how serious the burden is, not only to the dominion government but to some of our provincial governments as well, and I wish here to pay a tribute to the splendid spirit of the Canadian people under the strains and sacrifices of the last five years. That spirit as well as the stability and resiliency of our economic system have been beyond all praise. Also worthy of commendation are the earnest efforts which have been made by practically all public bodies to adjust their finances to the new and trying conditions, despite the criticism of the well-meaning arm-chair critics who find it easy to solve the difficulties of public treasuries by neglecting part of the problem. But the point I wish to make is that, oppressive as our burdens have been, they have actually been borne through the worst of the depression and at a level of taxation which is not abnormal when compared with the tax rates which certain other countries have imposed upon themselves. Furthermore, as I have tried to demonstrate, we are returning to more normal business conditions and price levels with a speed which a year ago few of us would have ventured to predict. With a normal volume of business and a reasonable price level I am convinced that we will be able to meet all our obligations without undue strain.
Under such circumstances the sound and practical policy appears to be to do our utmost to expedite the processes of business recovery and to facilitate those economic trends which will make for a lightening of
interest charges. I have already discussed the question of raising the price level which automatically serves to reduce the real burden of debt. A second factor which works both directly and indirectly is the gradual lowering of interest rates. This process we have also been endeavouring to foster by every legitimate means. A year ago I had occasion to refer to the efforts being made to secure a lowering of the interest rate paid on savings deposits by banks, trust companies and other institutions. As you are aware, these efforts led to a one-half per cent reduction in the deposit rate which was followed immediately by a corresponding reduction in the rates charged by banks to public bodies and to agricultural borrowers. It also contributed to strength in our investment markets. Because the savings deposit rate is the basic element in our whole interest structure, it is to be hoped that our financial institutions can see their way clear to make another similar reduction which I am sure would have an important stimulating influence at this time. The London loan which we floated so successfully last August was intended in part to relieve our own investment market and thus make it possible for other public and private borrowers to secure funds at more favourable rates. The continuance of our domestic conversion program to which I shall refer later and the strenuous efforts which we have made and are making to balance our budget and thereby justify a high credit basis, have also contributed to a lowering of interest rates.
The striking success of these concerted efforts are perhaps not fully appreciated by the Canadian public. It seems to me highly significant that the 4 per cent twelve-year bonds which we offered for public subscription last October at 96i to yield 4-38 per cent are now selling at approximately 101J or on a yield basis of 3-77 per cent. It is too much to expect that we are within sight of a 3i per cent basis for the dominion's medium or long term obligations? And if so, will not the attainment of that objective be a convincing demonstration of the wisdom of the policies which we have followed?
I may also refer to the improvement in the short-term money market. In March last we initiated a new development by offering for public tender $15,000,000 of short term treasury bills. Those bill were sold on a 2-85 per cent basis for the three months' maturity and a 3-12 per cent basis for the eight months' maturity, the lowest rates at which the dominion has ever borrowed in this country. I may add that yesterday, after this statement was prepared, we concluded
The Budget-Mr. Rhodes

acceptances of offerings for treasury bills to the extent of $15,000,000. Of that amount we borrowed $1,600,000 of the July 1 maturity at a cost of 2-41 per cent, and $13,400,000, being the balance, of the October maturity, at the rate of 2-71 per cent. We hope to continue this practice for our short-term requirements and, particularly when the Bank of Canada is established we anticipate marked improvement in the organization and development of our short-term money market and a more efficient utilization of the funds available therein.
The figures I have given refer to rates at which recent borrowing has been effected or at which our outstanding obligations are currently selling. If we take the interest now being paid on all our direct indebtedness at present outstanding, we find that the average is 4-62 per cent. Eliminating the victory bonds which will mature on November 1 this year and will be converted at I believe a substantially reduced rate during the next few months, eliminating also the 5 and 5i per cent tax-free issues which will not mature until 1937, and assuming that these war-time issues are replaced by 4 per cent securities (a very modest assumption), this average would be reduced to 4-35 per cent. Even this fairly satisfactory rate will I believe be further reduced during the next few years. That appreciable relief is being obtained through refunding operations is illustrated by the fact that in 1931, before the conversion loan was issued, the average interest paid by the dominion on its outstanding funded debt was practically 5 per cent.
The strength of our investment markets is reflected not only in the rise of bond prices, or which is the same thing, the lowering of interest rates, but also in the volume of new securities purchased by the public. During the last calendar year $345,000,000 of longterm obligations were absorbed by Canadian investors. Of this total $157,000,000 represented new capital. This compares with a total of new bond issues in the United States of only $900,000,000 of which $595,000,000 were for new capital. During the first quarter of this year our investment market has been active and strong. Over $73,000,000 of new government and municipal issues were offered during this period, or nearly four times the amount for the corresponding quarter of 1933. These healthy market conditions are full of promise for the gradual reduction of the interest burden now pressing upon public bodies, by the normal process of converting high-interest-bearing securities into new issues with a lower coupon.

The statistical presentation of improved conditions in Canada carries greater reassurance when viewed in the light of world economic conditions. For recovery has not been a development unique with us. It has been world wide and its universal character suggests that it must have a basis more fundamental and probably more permanent than would otherwise be the case. It is now clear that in several countries it began as early as the summer of 1932, in the United Kingdom perhaps even earlier, and that in practically all countries the improvement last year was substantial. Though the rate of progress has varied and in some cases the gains have been more consistently held than in others, the movement is so world-wide and generally so similar as to suggest the automatic working of fundamental economic forces.
Although encouraging progress has been made towards world recovery, it would be a mistake to under-estimate the difficulties that have still to be overcome before a full measure of world prosperity can be restored. Unemployment still persists in all countries in distressingly large proportions. International trade remains at a low level. Little, if any, progress has been made in removing the excessive interferences with trade, the arbitrary quotas, the exchange controls, and the other defensive measures which have been devised to meet the dangers of currency depreciation and unfavourable balances of payments. In recent months there has indeed been increased stability in the foreign exchange markets but the integrity of certain currencies continues to hang upon a slender thread. Another period of currency unsettlement with the threat of competitive depreciation must be recognized as a possibility at least and this suggests the desirability of a renewed consideration of the feasibility of concerted effort for de facto stabilization of currencies by the leading countries. I am aware of the difficulties which surround the problem which the world conference found it impossible to solve last summer. But some of these difficulties have been lessened in the intervening months and the need for early action is emphasized when one realizes that little progress can be made in reducing restrictions on international trade as long as currencies continue to fluctuate and the danger of competitive depreciation persists.
On the debit side of the record for the past year we are also compelled to record certain unfavourable political developments- a serious aggravation of political tensions in Europe and the Far East, an increasingly

The Budget-Mr. Rhodes
unstable social equilibrium in some important countries, a succession of disappointments in the disarmament negotiations, and a threatened breakdown of the collective system which has been painstakingly built up during the post-war years. It is true that the tension is less serious to-day than it was at the beginning of the year but it remains a deterrent to constructive international cooperation.
As long as these adverse influences continue to operate they must be taken into the reckoning. The fact remains, however, that the low point in the long depression has been reached and passed, that considerable progress has already been made in this and other countries in the restoration of normal conditions, and that present economic trends are in the direction of further progress. This should give solid ground for confidence, if not for undue optimism.


TRADE OF CANADA
[Stage Direction]
Evidence of improving conditions is also found in the statistics of external trade. The declines that have been a feature of world
trade in recent years have now, for Canada, been changed to increases, substantial for exports and not inconsiderable for imports. In the twelve months' period ended March 31, last, exports of Canadian produce increased by $105,500,000, or 22 per cent over the same period in the previous year. Imports, advancing less rapidly at first but showing greater gains in recent months, increased by $27,300,000, or 7 per cent. The improvement in aggregate trade was $132,300,000 over the same period last year, or 15 per cent, the total exceeding one billion dollars. The improvement has been on an ascending scale since July and in the last three months imports have increased by 40 per cent and exports by 50 per cent over the same period last year. The preliminary figures for the month of March, which will be released in the course of a few days, show total imports of $47,500,000, an increase of 45 per cent over March of last year. Exports are shown at $58,300,000, which is a gain of 56 per cent.
A statement of the total trade for the fiscal year ended March 31, with comparative figures, follows:
	Trade of Canada (excluding gold coin and bullion) (000 omitted) Fiscal year ended	Fiscal year ended March 31, 1934	
March 31,1933	(preliminary)	Increase
$ 406,384	$ 433,779	$ 27,395Exports- Canadian produce.. .	
473,800	579,368	105,568Foreign produce.. ..	
6,914	6,312	602*Total	
* Decrease.	
$ 887,098	$1,019,459	$ 132,361
As exports have advanced, taking the period as a whole, more rapidly than imports, the result is that in the fiscal year ended March 31, the excess of exports over imports amounted1 to nearly $152,000,000. In other words, Canada has derived from the exchange of commodities with the world at large, a credit balance of $152,000,000, available in the settlement of international balances for such debit items as interest on indebtedness owing abroad and instalments of principal. The favourable balance derived from trade in commodities was double the amount in the previous period.
It should be borne in mind that trade figures are for merchandise only and do not include gold. The exports of non-monetary gold, chiefly the current production of Canadian gold mines, amounted approximately to $90,000,000, based upon the average price obtained upon sale in world markets. This sum is an additional credit in the settlement of international payments.
The following statement shows the balance of trade in merchandise for the past five fiscal years:
1930..
1931..
1932.. 1933. . 1934*.
Trade of Canada (excluding gold coin and bullion) (000 omitted)
Fiscal year ended March 31st	Imports
	 $1,248,274
'	'		 906,613
"	  578,504
	   406,384
	   433,779
'Preliminary.
Exports
[Stage Direction]
Balance (-) $103,336 (-)	89,585
( + )	9,062
( + )	74,330
( + ) 151,901
The Budget-Mr. Rhodes
[Stage Direction]
The beneficial effects of the empire trade agreements are shown in the expansion of intra-empire trade. In the eleven months' period ended February 2Sth, the latest date for which figures by countries are available, exports from Canada to the United Kingdom, our largest market, increased by 20 per cent, accounting for more than half of the increased sales abroad. Exports to Australia increased by 54 per cent; to British India by 45 per cent; to British South Africa by 72 per cent and to New Zealand by six per cent. Statistics of the United Kingdom show that whereas in 1931 imports from Canada represented 3-8 per cent of their total purchases from abroad, in 1933 Canadian products represented 6-9 per cent of the total. Prominent among the commodities showing increased exports to the United Kingdom, were planks
and boards, apples, meats, copper and other metals, and cattle.
Imports from the United Kingdom have shown an expansion in the eleven months' period of approximately $16,000,000, or 20 per cent. The chief increases were in fibres, textiles and textile products, in iron and its products and coal.
The stimulus which the expansion of trade has brought to Canadian business is illustrated in the renewed activity reported in recent months at our maritime ports. Both freight received from and delivered to connections abroad have shown increases which are very marked and which, in turn, have produced substantial employment at the ports, as well as increased freight for the railways.
Figures showing the expansion of trade within the empire are as follows:
Intra-Empire Trade of Canada
(Excluding gold coin and bullion)
Eleven months ended February 28, 1933
Imports from United Kingdom	 $ 79,356,647
Exports to United Kingdom	 170,195,271
Imports from British Empire	 109,229,815
Exports to British Empire	 204,773,851
Eleven months ended February 28,1934 $ 95,277,635 204,747,312 127,293,776 248,667,773
About one-third of our purchases abroad has been from empire countries. The proportion in 1929 was about one-fifth. The percentage of exports to empire countries showed a further gain, while the proportion taken by non-empire countries declined moderately. It
is noteworthy that a somewhat larger proportion of exports was taken by the United States.
A statement showing the distribution of import and export trade, excluding gold coin and bullion, by percentages, follows:
United Kingdom British Empire. , United States. . Other countries.
Imports
Eleven months ended February 28 1933	1934
Per cent
21.25	24.67
29.25	32.95
57.32	54.14
13.43	12.91
Exports
Eleven months ended February 28 1933	1934
Per cent 38.93	39.25
46.83	47.66
30.37	33.40
22.80	18.94
These developments in our external trade have been distinctly favourable, reflecting the soundness of the policies which have been pursued in connection with the trade agreements, and testifying to the stability and efficiency of Canadian industry.
Revenues 1933-34
The recovery of business in Canada which I have described was reflected in expanding revenues. Unfortunately, however, this expansion did not begin until the second quarter of the fiscal year. While the extreme low point in business activity was reached in February, business continued without noticeable improvement until May. It was not,

indeed, until June that the index of physical production in Canada exceeded the figure for the corresponding month of the previous year. There is also always a lag of one or two months between business improvement and the increase in government revenues. In the case of the sales tax, for instance, the taxes applicable to any given month are not received by the Department of Finance until the first few days of the second following month. As a result, the first quarter of the fiscal year showed a substantial loss as compared with the corresponding period of the previous year. By July 8th our collections were down by $16,600,000, despite the additional measures of taxation which were introduced in the last

The Budget-Mr. Rhodes
budget. The acceleration of business and the upward movement of prices in the latter part of the year reversed this downward trend. By the end of December the lost ground had been fully recovered and the final accounts will show a total revenue from taxation of some $17,500,000 in excess of the previous year.
The total receipts from taxation were $271,800,000 as compared with $254,300,000 in 1932-33. The budget estimates, after giving effect to the new taxation, anticipated a total tax yield of $305,000,000. The failure to reach the estimated revenue by some $33,000,000 has naturally been disappointing, although we can derive encouragement from the fact that there has been a sustained and gradually increasing improvement in recent months. Had it not been for the low level of business in the first quarter and the lag in revenues-in other words, had we had for a full twelve months' period the revenue volume of the latter part of the year-our expectations would have been fully realized.
Customs
Customs import duties yielded $65,900,000 and remains the largest single source of revenue, although showing a decline from the previous year. Excise duties, levied mainly on liquors and tobaccos, amounted to $35,800,000. The revenue from income tax was $61,400,000, only slightly less than in the preceding year and about the same amount collected in 1931-32. Although based upon lower incomes and profits, the yield from this source has been maintained by reason of the changes in exemptions and rates of taxation, and also as a result of the special tax of 5 per cent on interest and dividends imposed last session. The collections from the latter tax amounted to $4,800,000 in the fiscal year. Here again the receipts did not reach the estimate, due to the elimination of the premium on United States currency.
The sales tax produced $63,000,000 and the other special excise taxes, $43,500,000, these sources combined bringing in $24,300,000 more than in the previous year.
The following table gives a comparativf statement of the revenues from taxation ii the past five years:
Taxation Revenues (000 omitted)
-	1929-30	1930-31	1931-32	1932-33	Estimated 1933-34$	$	$	$	$Customs Import Duties	
Excise Duties	179,430 65,036	131,209 57,747	104,133 48,655	70,073 37,834	65,926 35,871War Tax Revenues: Banks	
Insurance companies	1,408 74	1,429 74	1,390 12	1,328 826	1,345 742Delayed business profits	173 69,021	34 71,048	3 61,255	62,067	61,399Sales Tax	44,859	20,784	41,734	56,814	03,000Manufacturers', importation, stamp, transportation taxes, etc	18,550	13,951	17,872	25,377	43,574Total receipts from Taxation	378,551	296,276	275,054	254,319	271,857
Non-Tax Revenues
Revenues derived from the services of the various departments of government, including Post Office, amounted to $51,700,000, showing a decrease from the previous year of about $550,000. Post Office revenues amounting to $30,500,000 and interest on investments of over $11,000,000, are the important items under this head. On reference to the expenditure statement, it will be found that the operation of the Post Office Department cost $30,800,000, being $300,000 in excess of revenues. As the deficiency in the previous year was $700,000, there was a net betterment in the year of about $400,000. Interest on investments was slightly less than in 1932-33.
A statement of the non-tax revenues, with comparisons for the previous four years, follows:
The Budget-Mr. Rhodes
[Stage Direction]
Non-tax Revenues
-	1929-30	1930-31	1931-32	1932-33	Estimated 1933-34$	$	$	$	$Canada Grain Act	2,047,207	2,179,047	1,484,826	1,444,840	1,260,000Canada Gazette	93,890	71,197	73,590	73,836	56,000Canals	1,043,647	1,026,671	976,845	831,020	850,000Casual	3,892,948	3,210,394	3,757,821	3,192,144	3,550,000Chinese Revenue	14,345	21,996	10,059	8,652	7,000Dominion Lands	4,139,104	1,655,401	485,364	458,934	408,000Electricity	546,957	632,151	402,189	298,352	422,000Fines and Forfeitures	748,343	433,716	233,512	212,075	ISO,000Fisheries	110,724	73,937	40,519	4,429	40,000Gas Inspection	100,763	94,255	81,359	84,078	74,000Insurance Inspection	138,780	148,942	149,902	160,298	149,000Interest on Investments	13,518,205	10,421,224	9,330,125	11,220,989	11,205,000Marine	184,637	199,000	191,905	178,118	195,000Mariners' Fund	209,322	201,768	184,485	179,461	182,000Military College	19,820	19,882	20,045	20,116	20,000Military Pension Revenue	158,881	159,000	163,229	166,414	164,000Ordnance Lands	30,277	29,384	14,250	16,677	17,000Patent and Copyright Fees	574,918	559,646	525,248	539,341	409,000Penitentiaries	181,024	183,288	166,111	121,426	84,000Post Office	
Premium, Discount and Exchange	33,345,385 458,390 408,151	30,212,326 501,610 362,391	32,234,946	30,928,317 145,938 212,829	30,553,000Public Works	280,591	237,000Radio Licences	407,762	468,093	528,924	1,414,132	1,290,000R.C.M.P. Officers' Pensions	
Superannuation Fund	6,471 5	6,357	14,787	12,050	12,000Weights and Measures	407,248	419,750	406,529	394,222	400,000Total Non-Tax Revenues	62,787,204	53,291,426	51,757,161	52,318,688	51,764,000
After taking into consideration $392,000 of special receipts, the total revenues for the year amounted to $324,000,000, as compared with
$311,000,000 in 1932-33, as shown in the following summary statement, which also gives comparisons for each year since 1929-30:
Summary of all Revenues (000 omitted)
-	1929-30	1930-31	1931-32	1932-33	Esti- mated 1933-34Receipts from Taxation	$ 378,551 62,787	$ 296,276 53,291	$ 275,054 51,757	$ 254,319 52,318	$ 271,857 51,764Non-Tax Revenues	Consolidated Fund Receipts	441,338 4,771	349,567 6,622	326,811 7,028	306,637 4,493	323,621 392Special Receipts	Grand Total	446,109	356,189	333,839	311,130	324,013
EXPENDITURES, 1933-34 Ordinary Expenditures
The ordinary expenditures for the year amounted to $347,700,000. It will be understood that as the accounts will not be finally closed until the end of April, the figures of expenditures are preliminary and may vary somewhat from the final amounts. The estimates for 1933-34, including supplementaries and statutory items not printed in the esti-

mates, provided for a total expenditure on ordinary account of $363,700,000. The actual expenditures, therefore, are $16,000,000 less than the amount estimated.
In comparison with the previous year, ordinary expenditures show a reduction of $2,100,000. This result must be considered, however, in the light of the fact that increased expenditures were necessary on certain fixed and uncontrollable obligations. Interest on public debt increased by $4,700,000 and

The Budget-Mr. Rhodes
the requirement for Old Age Pensions increased by $1,000,000. Other large expenditures, over and above those of the previous year, included $1,000,000 for the Radio Commission and an increase of $1,500,000 in the
amount of the subventions paid on movements of Canadian coal from the mines to centres of consumption.
A statement of ordinary expenditures for the last five fiscal years, follows:
Statement by Departments of Expenditure for the Last Five Fiscal Years (000 omitted)
Ordinary Account	1929-30	1930-31	1931-32	1932-33	Esti- mated 1933-34$	$	$	8	$Agriculture	10,245	10,119	10,212	8,066	7,025Auditor General's Office	402	416	436	380	376Civil Service Commission	308	343	306	244	221External Affairs, including Office of the Prime	Minister	897	928	994	863	977Finance-	Interest on Public Debt	121,566	121,290	121,151 728	134,999	139,730 75Subsidies to Provinces	12,497	17,436	13,695	13,677	13,727Special Grants to Maritime Provinces	1,600	1,600	1,600	1,600	1,600Other Grants and Contributions	837	778	536	499 252	398Civil Pensions and Superannuations	1,545	1,476	1,405	1,075	1,302General Expenditure	2,006	1,794	1,845	1,794	3,159Fisheries	2,426	2,435	2,046	1,787	1,593Governor General's Secretary's Office	170	142	148	136	137Immigration and Colonization	3,094	2,588	2,200	1,689	1,393Indian Affairs	5,333	6,069	5,081	4,499	4,372Insurance	159	178	180	161	152Interior	8,490	8,104	4,647	3,454	2,874Justice	2,591	2,538	2,560	2,458	2,452Penitentiaries	2,561	3,237	2,737	2,870	2,748Labour	697	797	633	605	558Technical Education	413	391	283	202	150Old Age Pensions	1,537	5,658	10,032	11,513	12,500Legislation-	House of Commons	1,610	1,721	1,982	2,210	1,007Library of Parliament	74	76	81	65	69Senate	529	568	650	747	286General	80	65	79	81	44Chief Electoral Officer, including Elections	46	2,256	145	56	31Marine	8,944	8,030	7,262	5,801 149	5,535 1,025Mines and Geological Survey	1,358	1,420	1,264	1,048	940Movements of coal and Dominion Fuel Act	56	514	721	1,220	2,750National Defence-	Militia service	11,033	10,953	9,700	8,719	8,843Naval service	3,013	3,598	3,043	2,167	2,222Air service	5,921	7,147	4,040	1,731	1,689Sundrv services	1,925	1,928	1,347	1,078	798National Revenue (including Income Tax)	13,844	13,972	13,920	10,846	10,336Pensions and National Health-	Treatment and after-care of returned soldiers....	8,494	9,774	11,154	10,066	9,517Pension, war and military	40,032	45,541	48,249	45,079	42,867Health Division	1.39C	1,342	1,246	924	783Post Office	36,557	37,892	36,052	31,607	30,801Privy Council	58	54	55	47	49Public Archives	20E	212	212	174	158Public Printing and Stationery	302	295	289	231	174Public Works	19,819	25,455	17,648	13,108	11,141Railways and Canals	4,122	4,479	3,997	3,667	3,376Maritime Freight Rates Act	3,093	3,615	2,555	1,921	1,989Royal Canadian Mounted Police	3,100	3,192	3,488	5,626	5,550Secretary of State	454	479	483	418	378Soldier Settlement Board	1,362	1,300	1,036	818	741Trade and Commerce-	Department	3,252	4,955	6,417	3,277	3,083Mail subsidies and steamship subventions	1,083	1,323	2,999	2,081	2,235Canada Grain Act	2,271	2,356	2,306	2,026	1,766Total ordinary expenditure	353,399	382,827	365,873	349,811	347,702
The Budget-Mr. Rhodes
[Stage Direction]
Capital Expenditures
Capital expenditures, including Hudson Bay railway and terminals, Welland ship canal, St. Lawrence ship channel, and other public works, amounted to $6,500,000, being a
decrease of $2,000,000. The estimates provided for an expenditure of $7,100,000 on capital account. The saving, therefore, was $600,000.
A comparative statement of capital expenditures for the five-year period, follows:
Capital Expenditures
(000 omitted)
-	1929-30	1930-31	1931-32	1932-33	Esti- mated 1933-34Canals	$ 9,324 6,663 6,574	% 9,842 6,371 12,009	% 3,299 6,242 7,439	$ 3,027 1,503 4.018	$ 1,987 767 3,816Railways	Public Works	
22,561	28,222	16,980	8,548	6,570
					
Special Expenditures
Special expenditures amounted to $42,900,000, slightly under the figure of a year ago. Included in this amount is $36,000,000 for relief measures. Of this sum $28,500,000 was
paid under the Relief Act, 1933, and the balance of $7,500,000 represented commitments carried over from the relief acts of previous years. The expenditure for 1933-34 may be summarized as follows:
Direct relief	$ <.5,870,000
Provincial and municipal works and undertakings	 2,780,000
Other expenditures, including Dominion projects	 7,350,000
%	36,000,000
The expenditures made by the dominion on unemployment relief since 1930, have now reached $115,500,000, to which may be added the cost of the wheat bonus in 1931, amounting to $12,700,000 and $2,400,000 advanced for
employment in railway shops, a total of $130,600,000.
A comparative statement showing special expenditures under the different heads during the past five years, follows:
Special Expenditures (000 omitted)
-	1929-30	1930-31	1931-32	1932-33	Esti- mated 1933-34Adjustment of War Claims	$ 95 17 3,027 6,700	$ 110 193 2,955 500 4,432	% 91 1,350 3,500 1,331 13,190 25,100	$ 55 1,639 2,951 188 548 17.048 19,125	% 56 2,545 2,503Cost of Loan Flotations	Miscellaneous Charges	Reparations- Claims for Compensation	Unemployment Relief, 1930.	564 6,875 28,556Unemployment Relief, 1931	Unemployment Relief. 1932.	Unemployment Relief. 1933. .	Wheat Bonus	10,908	1,811	Reduction of Loans to Soldier Settlers .	8,599	1,800Total Special Expenditures	9,839	16,789	55,476	43,365	42,904
[Stage Direction]
The Budget-Mr. Rhodes
Loans to Provinces
Loans were made to the provincial governments under the Relief Act, to a net amount of 812,540,000 after crediting certain repayments. This addition to the loans of $38,200.000 outstanding at the close of the previous fiscal year, brings the total assistance of this nature to the provincial governments, to 850.700.000.
Three provinces, Alberta, Manitoba and British Columbia, received loans in connection with the payment of debt obligations to the public. Alberta borrowed $1,968,000 to meet a debenture maturity of the 1st April, 1934, payable in Canada or New York. Manitoba secured $1,470,000 to meet an obligation due the same date, also payable in Canada or New York. British Columbia received loans of $1,435,000 to meet interest obligations. The other loans related to the financing of the provincial share of relief expenditures or were for the purpose of placing the provinces in funds to assist municipalities to finance their share.
The provinces have paid interest on the loans as payments became due, with the exception of certain loans made to the province of Saskatchewan for relief purposes.
This province has not been able to meet the interest from its own resources and has tendered treasury bills in payment.
At the Dominion-Provincial conference held in January last, which was attended by representatives of all the provinces, it was unanimously agreed that the dominion government should give special financial assistance to provinces where conditions warrant.
In granting these loans, our policy has been, as in the two previous years, to limit this form of assistance to the minimum. Each application has been considered having regard to the special situation prevailing, the particular purpose of the loan and the general budgetary position of the borrower on the ordinary services of government. It is submitted that the policy which has been pursued in this respect has been to the general advantage of Canada, considered in the light of the unusual conditions prevailing and as a temporary measure until more normal conditions prevail.
A summary statement showing the loans to the several provinces outstanding at March 31, 1934. and the purposes for which they were granted, follows:
Loans to Provinces under Relief Acts
Net Outstanding March 31, 1934
(000 omitted)
-	Loans covering oDiigations maturing in New York	Loans for assistance to farmers, including purchase of seed grain	Loans for provincial purposes including public works and direct relief	TotalManitoba	$ 4,603 3,034 5,111 1.372	% 304 4,893 140	% 5,179 14,728 4,800 5,676	S 10,086 23,555 10,051 7,048
British Columbia					
	15,020	5,337	30,383	50,740
Loans and Advances, Non-Active
Under this head are included amounts paid by way of loan which are treated as non-active and which, being non-interest producing, are considered in the accounts as additions to the net debt. They include the amounts paid in connection with the operation of the Canadian National Steamships, the deficit of the Montreal harbour bridge, and loans to a number of the harbour commissions. The net amount of such loans in the past year was slightly over three million dollars.
For the operation of the Canadian National Steamships, we paid $986,000, made up of $968,000 being the cash deficit on the West Indies Services, and $18,000 being the cash deficit on the operation of the ships remaining in the Merchant Marine fleet. Owing to further reductions in the number of ships operated, the Canadian Government Merchant Marine has found it possible to return to the government an additional one million dollars from the insurance fund which has been accumulated during the operations of the company
[Stage Direction]
The Budget-Mr. Rhodes
since 1919. After receiving this amount, the result is a credit of $14,000 for the year on account of Canadian National Steamships.
The amount paid by the dominion government for the operation of the Montreal harbour bridge was $489,000. This represents the loss incurred by the bridge, not including depreciation and after crediting the annual contribution of $160,000 each from the province of Quebec and city of Montreal.
The non-active loans to the harbour commissions at Chicoutimi, Halifax, Quebec, Saint
John and Three Rivers for expenditures on capital account, amounted to $1,600,000. Other capital expenditures were incurred by several of the Commissions during the year, special arrangements for financing having been made between the commissions concerned and the contractors, with the approval of the governor in council.
The following statement gives the record of non-active loans and advances for the past five fiscal years:
Loans and Advances, Non-active (000 omitted)
-	1929-30	1930-31	1931-32	1*32-33	Estimated 1933-34Loans to Can. National Railways...	$ 2,933 2,491 2,821 17	$	$	$	$Loans to Can. National Steamships	
Loans to Harbour Commissioners. Miscellaneous Non-Active Accounts	1,827 3,661	1,199 1,913	(cr.) 1,383 4,898	(cr.) 14 2,110Can. Pacific Railway (Relief Acts) ..	1,447 *62,938	1,000Accounts carried as Active Assets transferred to Non-Active	8,262	5,488	3,112	67,900	3,096'Canadian National Railways-Loans of 1931-32	$	41,121Sundry Harbour Commissions-Advances prior to 1932-33	
21,817'Canadian National Railways-Loans of 1931-32	$	41,121Sundry Harbour Commissions-Advances prior to 1932-33	
21,817
In addition to the non-active loans to harbour commissions, there were loans of $449,000 to the Montreal commission and $1,208,000 to the Vancouver commission for port developments, and the amount of $19,000 to New Westminster. As interest is received on these
loans, they are treated as active assets and are not part of the net debt.
For purposes of record, I include a statement of the advances to harbour commissions in the past five years and of the amounts outstanding at the close of the fiscal year.
Advances to Harbour Commissions (000 omitted)
-	1929-30	1930-31	1931-32	1932-33	Estimated 1933-34Chicoutimi	$ 815	$	$	$	* 332 151Halifax	1,023	Montreal	Montreal-Bridge deficit..	170	534	395	New Westminster	Quebec	Saint John	107Three Rivers	Vancouver	345	2,802	809	1,208
11,436	15,777	14,051	5,547	3,786
[Stage Direction]
The Budget-Mr. Rhodes
Advances to Date
Chicoutimi	
Halifax	
Montreal	
Montreal-Bridge Deficit
New Westminster	
Quebec	
Saint John	
Three Rivers	
Vancouver	
$	3,282
8,768 58,422 1,588 275 26,257 12,748 2,694 .	22,625
$	136,659
Canadian Farm Loan Board
The dominion continued to purchase at par the board's five per cent bonds to the extent that loaning operations required. Bonds purchased amounted to $400,000 and a subscription of $16,243 was made to capital stock. The capital furnished to date from the dominion treasury for the operations of the board aggregates $8,503,358, divided as follows:
Initial capital	$5,050,000
Purchase of bonds	 3,000,000
Purchase of capital stock	 453,358
[Stage Direction]
The board has paid all interest due the government as it accrued.
Canadian National Railways
As the annual report of the trustees of the Canadain National Railway system has shown, railway operating revenues suffered a further decline of $12,500,000, or nearly 8 per cent, in the calendar year 1933. The loss in revenues was almost entirely covered by a saving in operating expenses. However, as the management had made its budget for the year on the basis of the gross earnings of the previous year being substantially maintained, the amount required from the dominion government for the payment of deficits exceeded the estimated figure by $4,300,000. The amount provided by the government and taken into the public accounts as an expenditure in respect of the deficit on the Canadian National Railway system, after payment of interest on obligations in the hands of the public was $58,950,000, a decrease of $1,100,000 from the previous year. The net loss of the system as shown by their accounts, amounted to $97,650,000. The difference between this sum and the contribution of the government above referred to, is made up of $36,000,000 for interest on loans from the
government-such interest being accrued in the railway accounts but not actually paid -and $2,600,000 for certain other non-cash items.
The amount paid for deficits is made up of two parts: that for the system, excluding eastern lines, $52,200,000, and that for the eastern lines, $6,600,000. In the dominion accounts of previous years and in the budget statements, it has been the practice to include the loss on the eastern lines under ordinary expenditures. That practice has followed naturally from the days when the government's interest in railway operation was limited to the Intercolonial and other line3 known as the Canadian government railways. Last year for the first time, following the recommendation of the Royal Commission on Railways and Transportation, the whole railway deficit was taken into the accounts of the dominion as an expenditure, but the portion for the eastern lines was shown under ordinary expenditures and the portion for the rest of the system was shown as a special charge to consolidated fund. For the purpose of clarity in the presentation of the figures, the amount for eastern lines deficit has been excluded this year from ordinary expenditures, and the necessary adjustments have been made in the figures for the previous years in order that the comparisons may not be disturbed. The amount required for railway deficit, including eastern lines, will be found in the summary statement of expenditures under the special category of railway deficits.
There has, of course, been retained under ordinary expenditures the amount involved in the 20 per cent freight rate subsidy authorized by the Maritime Freight Rates Act.
In addition to the provision for deficits, the railway company required $1,900,000 for capital expenditures and $11,300,000 for retirement of debt, these items totalling $13,200,000. Against this sum, the company had $5,000,000
The Budget-Mr. Rhodes
[Stage Direction]
of working capital available, leaving $8,200,000 to be supplied by the government by way of loan. Notwithstanding that the operating results were less favourable than anticipated at the commencement of the year, the company kept within its budget, the additional amount required for deficits having been made up by a saving in capital expenditures.
As at the end of March, 1934, the debt of the Canadian National Railway system outstanding in the hands of the public amounted to $1,253,000,000, having been reduced by $10,000,000 in the past year. Of the amount outstanding, $962,000,000 are obligations guaranteed by the dominion.
During the first three months of the present calendar year, there has been a decided improvement in railway earnings and the net revenues from operations are some $4,000,000 in excess of those of the corresponding period
in 1933. The railway budget for 1934 will total $85,800,000. Of this amount, $48,800,000 is the estimated requirement for deficits, and if this result is attained it will mean a lessening of the burden on the dominion treasury as compared with last year, of over $10,000,000. The company will require $4,200,000 for capital expenditures and $32,800,000 for retirement of capital obligations, including sinking fund and equipment principal payments. On September 1, $17,000,000 of Canadian Northern dominion guaranteed 4 per cent debenture stock will fall due.
The following statement summarizes the financial	requirements of the Canadian
National Railway system in respesct of the calendar year 1933, as compared with their budget figures and with the actual requirements in 1932:
Canadian National Railways
Financial Requirements
-	Actual 1933	Budget 1933	Actual 1932Deficit.:- System (ex eastern lines)	$ 52,263,819 G,691,569	$ 47,941,395 6,611,000	$ 53,422,661 6,635,845Eastern lines	Capital expenditures	58,955,388 1,958,116 11,269,985	54,552,395 5,993,121 12,265,584	60,058,506 799,158 11,510,178Debt retirement	Less working capital available	72,183,489 5,000,000	72,811,100 5,200,100	72,367,842 4,231,997Amount required	67,183,489	67,611,000	68,135,845
Summary of Expenditures
Having dealt with the expenditures for the year under the appropriate headings, it is now possible to present a summary statement of all expenditures for the year, including railway deficits. The total amount is $459,200,000 as compared with $468,726,000 in the previous year, a net reduction of $9,500,000. Actually the statement shows a total expenditure last
year of $531,700,000, but it will be remembered that $62,938,000 of this amount represented loans made in previous years to harbour commissions and the Canadian National Railways which were written down from active to nonactive assets, and strictly are not assessable against last year's business.
The summary of expenditures for the past five years followed:
[Mr. Rhodes.!

The Budget-Mr. Rhodes
Summary of Expenditures (000 omitted)
-	1929-30	1930-31	1931-32	1932-33	Estimated 1933-34Ordinary expenditures	
Capital expenditures	
Special expenditures	
Loans and advances-non-active	
Can. Nat. Railway deficit:-	$ 353,399 22,561 9,839 8,262	$ 382,827 28,222 16,789 5,488	$ 365,873 16,980 55,476 3,112	$ 349,811 8,548 43,365 67,900 53,423 8,717	$ 347,702 6,570 42,904 3,096 52,264 6,692Eastern lines	4,308	6,712	6,632	398,369	440,038	448,073	531,764	459,228
Corresponding figures for operations in the years 1929, 1930 and 1931 were $9,978,000, $28,425,000 and $52,256,000 respectively. In respect of these losses, $2,932,000 was taken into the government accounts as non-active loans in 1929-30, representing the 1929 loss after crediting certain surpluses in previous years. The losses in 1930 and 1931 were financed by loans and/or guarantee of securities. Government loans of $41,121,000 in respect of 1931 operations appear in the above statement under Loans and Advances, NonActive, for the year 1932-33.
Deficit for Year
With ordinary expenditures of $347,700,000 and ordinary revenues amounting to $323,-600,(XX), it will be seen that the deficiency on ordinary account was $24,100,000. The comparative figure for the previous fiscal year was $43,200,000. Notwithstanding the failure of the revenues to reach the anticipated figure, it will be observed that on ordinary account a net improvement of $19,100,000 took place.
After taking into consideration capital expenditures and special expenditures, including unemployment relief, less special receipts, it will be found that the deficit for the year on government operations, amounted to $76,300,000. This figure is further enlarged when there are .taken into the government accounts the losses on operation of the Canadian National Railway system amounting to $58,900,000. The resulting increase in net debt during the year on all accounts is $135,200,000. The corresponding figure for the previous year was $157,700,000, indicating a betterment of $22,500,000.
Reductions in Expenditures
In view of the interest in the question of the cost of government generally in Canada, it may be appropriate to present some figures briefly analyzing the purposes to which the outlay of the dominion government is applied, and indicating the extent to which, by the various measures of economy which have been adopted, controllable expenditures have been reduced since 1930-31. For the puipose of these comparisons, the extraordinary and fluctuating amounts required for railway deficits and unemployment relief, are excluded from the figures, but all other expenditures of the government are included.
In the year which has just closed, such expenditures -totalled $364,000,000. Of this amount, $230,000,000 was required for purposes classed as uncontroHable and $134,000,000 for controllable. In other words, out of every $100 expended $63 went for expenses designated as uncontrollable and $37 for services that are ordinarily regarded as controllable. The main services under uncontrollable are interest on public debt amounting to $139,700,000; war pensions, $41,700,000 and treatment and after-care of returned soldiers, $9,500,000. These three items alone account for 83 per cent of the expenditure included under the category of uncontrollable. There are, in addition provincial subsidies, $15,300,000; old age pensions, $12,500,000, and some minor items which do not add greatly to the total. All other expenditures whether on ordinary or special account, or capital or nonactive loans and advances, are included for the purpose of these computations under the heading of controllable.
I should point out that there are included in the latter classification many items of a statutory nature which are not controllable, in the sense of being subject to reduction at -the will of the government but they are included in that category because they pertain to the ordinary services of government. I might cite, for example, dry dock subsidies and the similar payments made in connection with the establishment of cold storage warehouses.	'
As compared with the year 1930-31, the uncontrollable expenditures for 1933-34 were
[Stage Direction]
The Budget-Mr. Rhodes
[Stage Direction]
greater by $19,000,000 due mainly to increased charges for interest on public debt and old age pensions.
The controllable expenditures, however, have declined from $217,000,000 to $134,000,000, a reduction of $83,000,000, or over 38 per cent. After allowing for the election expenses of two million dollars in 1930, for which there was no corresponding charge last year, the improvement stands at $81,000,000. This decrease has been brought about by a curtailment of $50,000,000 in ordinary expenditures and a reduction in capital and other expenditures of $31,000,000. To achieve this result, there has necessarily been a rigid scrutiny and control of departmental activities and personnel. From 1930 to 1933, government employees, including fluctuating as well as permanent staffs, were reduced by over 12,000 in number. The saving in salaries and wages exceeds $10,000,000 a year, not including the saving of some $7,800,000 arising out of the 10 per cent salary deduction.
There is further comparison which may be illuminating. In the fiscal year 1913-14, the ordinary controllable expenses of government amounted to $87,000,000, as compared with $123,000,000 last year. While these figures indicate an increase of $36,000,000, in a period of twenty years' growth and development of the country, there are important adjustments to be made to bring them to a comparable basis.
Of the increase of $36,000,000, over $17,000,000 is applicable to the Post Office department, the services of which have necessarily expanded in twenty years. The increased expenditure has been compensated for by a corresponding addition to the revenues and is not a contributing factor to the deficit of the government. Eliminating post office expenditures, the comparable figures become $73,000,000 for 1913-14, as compared with $93,000,000 in 1933-34, an increase of $20,000,000. In the interval, the population of Canada has increased from 7,600,000 to 10,300,000. The cost of maintaining public services has necessarily been influenced by the growth in population, as well as the addition of new services. Yet the actual expenditures
to-day on the ordinary controllable services of government are less than they were in 1913-14 considered on a per capita basis. The figures are at $9.60 a head in 1913-14, as compared with $9.03 last year.
In appraising this result, note should be taken of the cost of new services added in the interval. It now costs $5,000,000 more annually to collect the public revenues than in 1913-14, due to the amplification of the taxation system. While the percentage cost of collection is lower, the actual expenditure has naturally been increased. The cost of administering the public debt is included under controllable expenditures and requires about $500,000 more than in 1913-14. Other new items are $1,000,000 for the Radio Commission, $320,000 for radio services, $1,600,000 for the Aviation Branch of the Department of National Defence, $380,000 for National Research Council and $2,750,000 for the movement of Canadian-mined coal. These items alone total $11,000,000. There are other items, such as the cost of operation of the new Welland ship canal, increased expenditures in connection with the grain act, amounting to some $1,300,000, and other expenses such as those arising from improvements in the status of labour, workmen's compensation and the eight-hour day, which have added, and quite properly so, to the cost of certain services.
Viewed in the light of these comparisons with the expenditures of 1913-14, and not desiring to minimize the necessity for the closest scrutiny of the cost of governmental services, particularly in view of the weight of our fixed charges, it does appear that the controllable expenditures have now been reduced to a point from which it will be difficult to effect further substantial savings without curtailment or discontinuance of services which are considered to be essential.
A comparison of the expenditures in the years 1913-14, 1930-31 and 1933-34, divided under the headings controllable and uncontrollable, is shown in the following statement, which also shows the percentages of the total required for the various services.
[Stage Direction]
The Budget-Mr. Rhodes
Expenditure, Uncontrollable and Controllable (000 omitted)
1913-14	1930-31	1933-34	-	Actual expendi- ture	Percentage of total expenditure	Actual expendi- ture	Percentage of total expenditure	Esti- mated expendi- ture	Percentage of total expenditure estimated$	$	$	In General Uncontrollable-	12,894	9-36	121,290	28-28	139,730	38-3644,234	10-31	41,777	11-475,658	1-33	12,500	3-43Other pensions and superannuation....	756	0-55	5,037 9,774	1 -16 2-28	4,561 9,517	1-	25 2-	61Subsidies to provinces	
Other items	11,280 3,101	8-19 2-25	19,036 6,657	4-44 1-56	15,327 7,076	4-21 1-9428,031	20-35	211,686	49-36	230,488	63-27Controllable- Ordinary-	3,271	2-37	10,119	2-36	7,025	1-931-20	2,275	0-53	1,433	0-392,120	1-54	5,847	1-36	4,139	1-14Interior	
Justice-including penitentiaries	
Marine-including radio commission Mines-including movements of coal	5,132 2,469 4,915 741 12,011	3-73 1-79 3-57 0-54 8-72	8,104 5,775 8,030 1,934 23,626	1-89 1-35 1-87 0-45 5-51	2,874 5,200 6,560 3,690 13,552	0-	79 1-	43 1-80 1-01 3-725,124	3-72	13,972	3-26	10,336	2-8413,566	9-85	37,892	8-83	30,801	8-4520,288	14-73	25,453	5-94	11,141	3-062,279	1-65	4,043	0-94	3,189	0-88Royal Canadian Mounted Police....	1,101 5,323	0-80 3-87	3,005 8,407	0-	70 1-	96	5,367 6,964	1-47 1-917,009	5-09	16,723	3-90	11,241	3-0*87,004	63-17	175,205	40-85	123,512	33-91Capital-	7,103 2,847 10,100	9,842 6,371 12,009	2-29	1,987	0-542-07	1-49	767	0-217-33	2-80	3,816	1-0520,050	14-56	28,222	6-58	- 6,570	1-80Special, including miscellaneous charges...	32	0-02	9,456	2-21	2,063	0-572,612	1-90	4,325	1-00	1,639	0-45
109,698	79-65	217,208	50-64	133,784	36-73
						
Total uncontrollable and controllable -	137,729	100-00	428,894	100-00	364,272	100-00Not included in the above- Canadian National Railways-	*28,425 6,712 4,432	52,264 6,692 36,000	
Canadian Government Railways-	17,295 19,036					
						
						
* Not taken into Government accounts in 1930-31.
74726-145J
The Budget-Mr. Rhodes
[Stage Direction]
Loan Flotations
In the past fiscal year, the dominion had securities falling due amounting to $279,900,000. New issues were made for these maturities, as well as for new money which it was required to raise for governmental and railway purposes.
An issue of 4 per cent registered stock dated September 1, 1933, and maturing September 1, 1958, was made in London. The stock is callable on or after September 1, 1953, on giving three months' notice. The issue was offered to the public at 100, yielding 4 per cent. As the dominion had not been a borrower in the London money market for some eighteen years, the response of the investing public was awaited with keen expectation. The issue was an outstanding success, the applications totalling 20,000, representing over £80,000,000. The success of the offering was a tribute to the financial and economic stability of Canada and reacted most favourably on the market position of dominion securities at home and abroad. The stock has risen to a premium and is now selling on a basis to yield less than 3i per cent. The terms of the issue provided for a sinking fund of one-half of one per cent per annum.
An issue of 4 per cent treasury notes dated July 1, 1933, was made in New York for the purpose of refinancing a like amount of 4 per cent notes due October 1 and called for payment on August 1. The new issue runs for 15 months from July 1, 1933, and is callable on or after 12 months. The issue was sold to the Chase National Bank of New York at a price of 98-875 and accrued interest.
An issue of $50,000,000 of 4i per cent treasury bills held by the chartered banks of Canada matured August 1, 1933, and provision was made for renewal of this obligation by the issue at par of a similar amount of bills to run for one year, bearing interest at 3J per cent.
Two other issues of treasury bills were made during the year. In May last, $40,000,000 of 3i per cent treasury bills due in six months were sold to chartered banks at an interest cost to the government of 3J per cent. These bills were converted into longer term securities on their maturity in November.
.A further sale of treasury bills was made by public tender. The amount of the issue was $15,000,000, dated March 1, 1934, and maturing either June 1, 1934, or November 1, 1934. Of the 3-months' bills $2,450,000 were sold at an average cost to the government of
2-85 per cent and of the 8-months' bills $12,550,000 at an average cost of 3-12 per cent.
On 'November 1 last, provision had to be made for $169,900,000 of maturing victory loan bonds, the balance remaining outstanding of the 1918 issue. To meet the obligation and provide funds for current purposes, a domestic loan of $225,000,000 was launched. The bonds were dated October 15 and were issued in three maturities: 2-year bonds with interest at 3i per cent and 6 and 12 year bonds with interest at 4 per cent. The 2-year bonds were offered at 99-50 to yield 3-75 per cent, the 6-year at 99-00 to yield 4-19 per cent, and the 12-year at 96-50 to yield 4-38 per cent. The 12-year bonds were made subject to call, at the option of the government, after 10 years, and the issue price represented the lowest yield basis on which long term dominion securities had ever been offered in the domestic market. By way of inducement to holders of victory loan bonds, a bonus was offered for prompt conversion, and over $139,000,000 of the maturing victory bonds were turned in for exchange. The banks also converted $40,000,000 of 3i per cent treasury bills sold to them in May. The total cash subscriptions amounted to $76,700,000, of which $45,700,000 was accepted. It is interesting to note that the small investor participated to a large extent in this offering, as out of a total of 22,663 cash subscriptions there were 16,426 from subscribers for amounts of $1,000 or less. In addition, there were many small subscribers who turned in their maturing bonds for the new issue.
The amount issued of 2-year bonds was $89,300,000, of the 6-year maturity $47,200,000, and of the 12-year maturity $88,300,000. The average interest cost on all maturities was 4-17 per cent, after including bonus for prompt conversion and commissions paid to banks and dealers. The expenses of issue, including commissions, advertising, printing, etc., were less than one-half of one per cent.
It is a matter of considerable satisfaction that the year's financing has been carried through so successfully at rates of interest that have been progressively favourable. Over $858,000,000 of war and victory loans bonds have been converted into new securities since 1930 in connection with which there has been a saving in interest in excess of $9,000,000 a year.
The direct obligations of the dominion in the form of unmatured funded debt and treasury bills are listed in the following statement:
[Mr. XUiodes.l

The Budget-Mr. Rhodes
Unmatured Funded Debt and Treasury Bills as of March 31, 1934 and Annual Interest Charges
Date of maturity
1934-June	i	
July	i	
Aug.	i	
Got.	i	
Nov.	i	
Nov.	i	
1935-Aug.	1 (a).
Oct.	15	
Oct.	15	
1936-Feb.	1	
Nov.	15	
1937-Mar.	1 (a).
Dec.	1 (n).
1938-July	1	
July	1	
July	1	
July	1	
1939-Oct.	15	
1940-Sept.	1	
1941-Nov.	15	
1943-Oct.	15	
1944-Oct.	15	
1945-Oct.	15	
1946-Feb.	i	
1947-Oct.	1	
1950-July	1	
1952-May	i	
Oct.	15	
1956-Nov.	1	
1957-Nov.	1	
1958-Sept.	1	
1958-Nov.	1	
1959-Nov.	1 (b)
1966-Oct.	1	
Oct.	1	
Treasury Bills due June 1, 1934. Treasury Bills due Nov. 1, 1934
Rate, %	Where payable	Amount of Loan31	London	$ 23,467,206 275	Canada	33,293,470 8531	Canada	50,000,000 004	New York	60,000,000 004	Canada	35,000,000 0051	Canada	222,216,850 005	Canada and N.Y.	874,000 004	Canada	25,000,000 0031	Canada	89,393,000 0041	New York	40,000,000 005	Canada	79,535,200 005	Canada and N.Y.	89,787,100 005J	Canada	236,299,800 003	London	8,071,230 163	London	18,250,000 003	London	10,950,000 003i	London	15,056,006 664	Canada	47,269,500 0041	Canada	75,000,000 005	Canada	141,663,000 005	Canada	147,000,100 0041	Canada	50,000,000 004	Canada	88,337,500 0041	Canada	45,000,000 002h	London	4,888,185 6431	London	137,05S,S41 005	New York	100,000,000 004	Canada	56,191,000 0041	Canada	43,125,700 004i	Canada	37,523,200 004	London	73,000,000 004i	Canada	276,687,600 0044	Canada	289,693,300 004	London	93,926,666 664	New York	100,000,000 002,450,000 0012,550,000 002,858,558,457 24
Annual interest charges
i
821,352	22
1,664,673	54
1,937,500	00
2,400,000	00
1,400,000	00
12,221,926	75
43,700	00
1,000,000	00
3,128,755	00
1,800,000	00
3,976,760	00
4,489,355	00
12,996,489	00
242,136	90
547,500	00
328,500	00
526,960	23
1,890,780	00
3,375,000	00
7,083,150	00
7,350,005	00
2,250,000	00
3,533,500	00
2,025,000	00
122,204	64
4,797,059	43
5,000,000	00
2,247,640	00
1,940,656	00
1,688,544	00
2,920,000	00
12,450,942	00
15,933,131	50
3,757,066	67
4,000,000	00
131,890,287 88
Payable in Canada	$ 2,083,229,220 85
Payable in Canada and New York	 90,661,100 00
Payable in New York	 300,000,000 00
Payable in London	 384,668,136 39

[Stage Direction]
Less bonds and stocks of the above loans held as
sinking funds	 69,406,434 43
[Stage Direction]
72-88%
3-17%
10-49%
13-46%
100%
(a)	Tax free in Canada.
(b)	5J% to Nov. 1, 1934.
Indirect Liabilities
Bonds outstanding at March 31, 1934, bearing the guarantee of the government of Canada, amounted to $993,000,000, having been reduced by approximately $3,000,000, in the year.
During the year some further contingent liabilities were assumed, under the authority of the Relief Act. In June last, 5 per cent treasury bills of the provinces of British Columbia and Manitoba were guaranteed to the
amounts of $626,533 and $5,894,127, respectively, in order to enable these provinces to raise monies required for the payment of obligations due in New York. Also in the month of June last, two guarantees were given in connection with the production of 30,000 tons of steel rails by the Algoma Steel Corporation and 50,000 tons of steel rails by the Dominion Steel and Coal Corporation, both orders being for the Canadian National Railways. The guarantee of the dominion is
The Budget-Mr. Rhodes
[Stage Direction]
limited to $660,000 in the case of the Algoma order and $1,100,000 in the Dominion Steel and Coal order. The amount of the guarantee represents approximately one-half of the amount involved in the purchase and is related to that portion of the cost represented by wages and materials that had to be bought. The government also undertook to pay interest at 5 per cent on the amount of the guaranteed advances until the rails are delivered.
For the purpose of enabling the Canadian Pacific Railway Company to meet capital obligations and indebtedness, payable partly in Canada and partly in the United States, the dominion guaranteed advances and interest thereon to the amount of $60,000,000 obtained by the company from Canadian chartered banks. In view of existing conditions, the company found itself unable to make a public issue of securities in the markets in which such financing would ordinarily have been done. The bank loans are secured by $100,000,000 par value of 'Canadian Pacific Railway Company 4 per cent perpetual consolidated debenture stock.
Reference has been made in the previous budgets to the assistance given by way of guarantee to western wheat marketing agencies. It may be observed that in connection with the marketing of the 1931 and 1932 crops, the advances which were obtained by the pools in Manitoba, Saskatchewan and Alberta, under guarantee of the dominion, were repaid and no liability was incurred by the government. In 1933, the marketing agencies were able to finance their operations without government assistance. An order in council passed in April last under the Relief Act, 1933, continued the guarantee given to Canadian Cooperative Wheat Producers Limited, in respect of advances obtained for the marketing of the 1930 crop and the purchase of grain contracts made and to be made in order to secure the advantageous sale of wheat under their control. In so far as the latter guarantee is concerned, it will all depend, as stated before, upon the world wheat situation and the course of wheat prices as
to whether there will be any ultimate loss to the dominion treasury as a result of this guarantee. It is fairly generally recognized, however, that the assistance which has been given in this direction has been of material advantage to wheat producers in particular and to the country as a whole, as otherwise the selling pressure at certain periods of the year, without some stabilizing influence in the market, would undoubtedly have resulted in harmful and depressing fluctuations in grain prices.
The guarantee authorized in 1932 in respect of bank advances of $15,538,500 to the Beau-harnois Right, Heat and Power Company, was amended slightly to accord with the reorganization of the capital structure of this company. Recently a public issue was made of a portion of the first mortgage bonds securing the guaranteed bank advances, and as a result the amount of the guaranteed advances outstanding will be reduced by about one-half.
The guarantees given under the relief acts, as at March 31, 1934, amounted to $93,296,000, apart from those relating to wheat which are not for a stated sum and fluctuate from day to day. The list is as follows:
Guarantees under Relief Acts
Principal amount of guarantee outstanding March 31,1934
Province of British Columbia..	$	626,533
Province of Manitoba	 5,894,127
Province of Manitoba Savings
Office	 10,844,853
Algoma Steel Corporation. .	. .	660,000
Dominion Steel and Coal Corporation	 540,000
Canadian Pacific Railway Company	 60,000,000
Beauharnois Light, Heat & Power
Company	 14,105,558
Government of Newfoundland.. .	625,000
Canadian Co-operative Wheat
Producers Ltd	 Unstated
The statement of bond issues guaranteed by the dominion government, outstanding at March 31, 1934, follows:
[Mr. Rhodes.!

The Budget-Mr. Rhodes
Bonds Guaranteed by Dominion Government as at March 31, 1934
Date of Maturity	Issue	Interest Rate	Amount OutstandingSept. 1, 1934	% 4	$ 17,060,333 33Feb. 15,1935	4)	17,000,000 00Sept 1, 1936	6	24,220,000 00Oct. 1,1940...	7	23,740,000 00Dec. 1, 1940	7	23,779,000 00July 1, 1946	6)	24,238,000 0041	700,000 00Sept. 1, 1951	4*	50,000,000 00Aug. 1,1952...	5	667,953 04July 10, 1953	3	9,359,996 72Feb. 1, 1954	5	50,000,000 00Sept 15,1954...	41	26,000,000 00Mar. 1, 1955	Can. National (West Indies) Steamships.	5	9,400,000 00June 15,1955...	4!	50,000,000 00Feb. 1, 1956...	4i	70,000,000 0041	65,000,000 00July 20, 1958	31	7,896,557 3131	3,149,998 66May 19,1961....	31	34,229,996 87Jan. 1,1962...	3	34,992,000 004	8,440,848 00Dec. 1, 1968	4)	35,000,000 00Julv 1, 1969	5	60,000,000 00Oct. 1, 1969	5	60,000,000 00Nov. 1, 1969	5	19,000,000 00Feb. 1, 1970	5	18,000,000 002	27,178,703 00Various dates 1934-54	City of St. John Debs, assumed by St.	John Harbour Comm'rs	Various	1,266,018 80Serial-Feb. 1 and Aug. 1,1934-38..	Can. National Equip. G	5	6,750,000 004	60,833,333 33it	5	20,782,491 67it	Great Western Debenture Stock	5	13,252,322 67it	4	119,839,014 33it	North. Ry. of Canada Deb. Stock	4	1,499,979 67$993,276,547 40Completing the statistical presentation of	the assets and liabilities as at March 31, 1934,
the affairs of the dominion, a statement of follows:
Liabilities, March 31, 1934 (Estimated)
Dominion notes outstanding	
Bank circulation redemption fund	
Insurance and superannuation funds-
Government annuities	 $ 34,660,000
Insurance fund, civil Bervice	 8,440,000
Insurance fund, returned	soldiers	 12,313,000
Retirement fund	 7,528,000
Superannuation funds	 46,335,000
Trust funds-
Indian funds	  13,631,000
Common school funds	 2,675,000
Contractors' securities deposits	 118,000
Other trust funds	 2,180,000
Contingent and special funds	
Post Office money orders, postal notes, etc., outstanding
Province accounts	
Post Office savings bank deposits	
Funded debt-
Unmatured	 2,789,152,000
Matured but not presented for payment	 2,500,000
Interest coupons matured but not presented for payment
[Stage Direction]
The Budget-Mr. Rhodes
[Stage Direction]
Assets, March 31, 1934 (Estimated)
Active Assets-
Cash, working capital advances and other current assets. ..
Specie reserve	
Advances to banks under Finance Act	
Loans to provinces-
Housing	
Relief Acts
[Stage Direction]
Loans to foreign governments-
Greece	 6,525,000
Roumania	 23,969,000
Loans to harbour commissioners-
Montreal	 58,422,000
Vancouver	 22,625,000
New Westminster	 275,000
Canadian National Railways	
Canadian Farm Loan Board	
Soldier and general land settlement	
Seed grain and relief advances	
Canadian government railways open and stores accounts .. Deferred debits-
Unamortized discount and commission on loans
[Stage Direction]
Net debt March 31, 1934 (estimated)
[Stage Direction]
Represented by-
Non-active Assets, March 31, 1934 (estimated) -
Capital expenditures-
Public works, Canals	 $ 242,092,000
Railways	 444,314,000
Public buildings, harbour and river improvements	 251,061,000
Military property	and stores	 12,035,000
Territorial accounts	 9,896,000
Loans, non-active-
Canadian National Railways	
Railway accounts (old)	
Canadian National Steamships	
Harbour commissioners
[Stage Direction]
Quebec	 $ 26,257,000
Chicoutimi	 3,282,000
Halifax	 8,768,000
Saint John	 12,748,000
Three Rivers	 2,694,000
Montreal south shore bridge	 1,588,000
Seed grain and relief advances	
Soldier and general land settlement	
Miscellaneous advances	
Consolidated fund-
Balance, consolidated fund, brought forward from March
31, 1933	 811,417,000
Excess of expenditure over revenue, fiscal year ended March
31, 1934 (estimated)	 125,549,000
959.398.000
655.527.000
88.399.000
15.353.000
55.337.000 675,000
16.514.000 3,527,000
936,966,000
[Stage Direction]
Ways and Means, 1934-35
With higher prices and expanding volume of business, the outlook for the revenues in the current fiscal year is distinctly favourable. A substantially increased income over the past year is assured even with only a maintenance of the gains already made and there are indications that the upward movement is being continued. The collections in the first two weeks of April have been most reassuring. As 
the ordinary expenses of government have been kept closely to the amount disbursed last year, and as there is ground for expecting a substantial reduction in the requirements for unemployment relief and railway deficits, it seems reasonably clear that we can anticipate a greatly improved budget position without adding to the existing rates of taxation. The taxation proposals therefore are not extensive.

The Budget-Mr. Rhodes
Income Tax
No changes will be made in the schedules of income tax rates and exemptions. The five per cent tax on interest and dividends will be retained for another year. The Income War Tax Act, however, will be subject to a number of minor amendments, designed primarily to remove existing inequalities in its application.
Sales Tax
There are a few, but very few, alterations proposed in the various taxes at present levied under the Special War Revenue Act. I shall now enumerate these, commenting very briefly where any particular item calls for explanation.
It is not proposed to make any change in the rate of sales tax nor to alter materially the existing schedule of exemptions from this tax. There will be transferred to the exempt list bakers' cake and pies, certain sugar bush equipment, and milk albumen used exclusively in the production of animal or poultry feed. Otherwise the sales tax will remain unaltered.
Excise Taxes
With respect to excise taxes (apart from the changes to be mentioned in connection with beer and some of its ingredients which are in future to be dealt with under the Excise Act), the following changes are to be made. The present tax on sugar will be reduced to one cent a pound. Glucose and grape sugar, except when used in the manufacture of leather and artificial silk, will in future bear the rate of one-half cent a pound. These changes in the tax on sugar will become effective as of July first. On sparkling wines the tax will be reduced to seventy-five cents a gallon. The tax on cigarette tubes imported into or manufactured in Canada will be reduced from four to three cents a hundred tubes.
With respect to all imports under the British preferential tariff, the special excise tax will be reduced by one half, that is from three to one and one-half per cent. The reduction will also apply to certain commodities which under empire agreements enter Canada at lower rates of duty than those obtaining under the British preference.
The stamp tax on postal notes issued in the amount of $1 and under is to be reduced to one cent.
Tax on Gold
To replace the revenue lost by the reduction in the tax on sugar, it is proposed to levy a tax of ten per cent on gold. In this connection one must keen in mind the fact that since our abandonment of the gold standard, the price of gold in Canadian currency has risen from $20.67 an ounce to approximately $35. This is an increase in the selling price of the product of our gold mines of about seventy per cent. Furthermore, the extraordinary increase in the profits which accordingly accrue to gold producers finds its origin in circumstances entirely external to this particular industry. That is to say, the reason for this increase in price is to be found in the chaotic conditions of world currencies, the depreciation of our dollar in the foreign exchanges and the devaluation of gold by certain countries.
The proposed ten per cent tax will be deducted from the proceeds of all gold deposited at the mint for sale. On such gold as is unacceptable for treatment at the mint and is exported, the tax shall be collected under regulations to be made by the governor in council. In order that the tax shall not apply when the conditions giving rise to these fortuitous gains accruing to gold producers have to a degree disappeared, it is provided that the tax shall not operate to reduce the amount paid for gold below $30 an ounce in Canadian currency. In view of the tax the present handling charge incidental to the disposal and sale of the gold will be discontinued.
In announcing this tax, it is perhaps expedient that I suggest in advance a partial view of the circumstances which I believe make this form of tax more desirable than any alternative form which suggests itself, such as, for example, an excess profits tax on gold producers. This aspect of the matter has received the most careful consideration and we are convinced that whilst a tax designed to reach excess profits has certain advantages, the form of the tax as proposed is, on balance, best adapted to meet our particular situation.
For example, you are aware that many of our mines in Canada in the process of producing gold, produce other metals as well, and that in some other mines where base metals are the major products, considerable gold is recovered in the process. The difficulty which would arise in such cases in the levying of an
The Budget-Mr. Rhodes
[Stage Direction]
excess profits tax would be that of determining for taxation purposes the profits due to the increase in the price of gold. The proposed tax avoids this difficulty. It may also be emphasized that the tax will be extremely simple in administration and can be collected with a minimum of cost. An excess profits tax, on the other hand, would necessarily be more complex and would involve additional expense and administrative machinery. Furthermore, the present tax will immediately return substantial revenue, while a tax on profits, unless made retroactive, would not provide additional revenue for the current year.
Against the contention that the proposed tax will injure the gold mining industry, it can be asserted that little if any of our production is obtained at present on such a narrow margin of profit as to be vitally affected by the proposed tax. Also, there is reason to believe that many of the recently discovered bodies of ore are such that profits would be realized even if the price of gold were at the usual $20.67 level, the price under which, I may point out, we attained the position of second largest gold producing country in the world.
Finally, it is believed there can be no legitimate objection to a tax which will operate merely to establish a market price for gold of approximately $31.50 an ounce fine under present conditions, especially when it is remembered1 that the average price received by our gold producers during the last calendar year was only $28.72 an ounce. This was a year, as you are aware, of great prosperity in the industry and of intense activity in the exploration and development of gold mining properties.
Excise Duties
The principal change in connection with excise duties is a consolidation of the existing duty of three cents a pound on malt and the gallonage tax of twelve and one-half cents on beer now levied under the Special War Revenue Act, into a single excise duty of seven and one-half cents a pound on malt.
While this change will result in a slight reduction in the rate of taxation to which beer is directly or indirectly subject, if calculated on a gallonage basis, it is believed that the total revenue forthcoming will at least equal that currently obtained from malt and beer. The new method of administration will assure not only more economical but also more cer-

tain collection of the tax. Furthermore, since the duty is to be levied on the malt alone, the time of payment will be advanced and the revenue secured before the malt goes into production.
In accordance with the above-mentioned change the existing duty on beer or fermented beverages made from substances other than malt has been increased by the appropriate amount and the excise tax on beer imported becomes an excise duty. The existing tax of twenty cents a pound on malt syrup is to be reduced to seventeen cents to allow for the increase in the duty on the malt used in its production and will be levied as an excise duty. In view of the increase in the duty on malt the existing tax on sweet wort is to be repealed. These changes in excise duties become effective July 1.
Customs Tariff
Amendments to the Customs Tariff are relatively few in number, but not without interest, and are summarized as follows:
Reduction under all tariffs	 24
Reductions under British preferential
tariff only	 15
Reductions under intermediate and
general tariffs only	 13
Increases under intermediate and/or
general tariffs	 2
Increases under all tariffs	 1
Clarification of wording	 17
Items of major commercial importance on which reductions are confined to the British preferential tariff include jute yarns, wide steel plate, salt cake, crude oil not in its natural state, impregnated canvas and spun yarns of artificial silk.
Numerous chemical commodities are returned to the free list, the more important of these being gum amber, aluminum leaf, flotation reagents, ingredients of synthetic resins and synthetic kryolite.
The solitary instance of upward revision under all tariffs is that of jute twines, the proposed rates being the result of an inquiry by the tariff board.
Duties are imposed, under the intermediate and general tariffs, on crude peanut oil and are increased on certain ferro-alloys. The former action provides an empire preference contemplated by the imperial' economic conference but not hitherto made effective; the latter is intended to protect an important Canadian key industry, the only one of its

The Budget-Mr. Rhodes
kind in the dominion, against the questionable commercial practices of certain European producers.
The drawback pf duty hitherto granted on imported bituminous coal, used in the production of coke in iby-product recovery coke ovens, has been widened in terms to cover coke " produced by any method," with the amount of drawback for the entire item reduced from ninety-nine to fifty per cent.
Tariff Board
Since its inception in the early part of last summer, the tariff board, under Part I of The Tariff Board Act, has reported to Parliament upon eleven references made to it by the Minister of Finance. The subject matter of these reports is as follows:	salt
cake, impregnated canvas, jewellery findings, glass bases for imitation pearls, firearms and parts, button blanks, sailcloth of Egyptian cotton, jute yarns and twines, collodion bronze powders and telegage liquid. As respects all but the three last named, the Board's reports are directly reflected in several of the tariff proposals being announced today. These reports will be tabled forthwith. In addition, the tariff board has prepared an interim report on the wool reference, which arose out of an application by the British producers of woollen goods. The latter report will be tabled shortly.
Following representations by His Majesty's government in the United Kingdom, this government contemplates action by order in council whereby the British content requirement shall be reduced from one-half to one-quarter, in respect of a wide range of chemicals, drugs, and chemical commodities.
Revenues 1934-35
It is estimated that the total revenue for the current fiscal year, after giving effect to the changes which have been enumerated, will amount to $360,000,000, made up as follows:
Taxation revenue:
Customs duties	$ 78,000,000
Excise duties	  40,000,000
Income tax	 61,000,000
Sales tax	 72,000,000
Manufacturers', stamp, importation and other special taxes.. 55,000,000
[Stage Direction]
Non-tax revenue:
Post office	$ 32,000.000
Interest on investments	 11.300,000
Other sources	 10,700,000
[Stage Direction]
Total	$360,000,000
The ordinary expenditures for 1934-35 are estimated at $351,200,000. The anticipated revenue, therefore, will provide fully for these expenditures and leave a surplus of $8,800,000 to apply on capital and extraordinary expenditures.
While the demands upon the treasury have not permitted any general lowering of the rate of taxation, it is felt that the reductions, remissions and adjustments already outlined will have the effect of easing the burden in those cases where it has borne most heavily, and that the single increase in taxation will not result in undue, if any, hardship.
Thoughtful observers have with one voice expressed the opinion that the process of recovery from this unprecedentedly severe and prolonged depression would be gradual. Indeed, it may be fairly asserted that too rapid recovery would present the danger of an unhealthy reaction, and that we would be far better off in the long run if improving conditions should conform to the truth of the old adage, "slow, but sure."
At the same time, while the improvement has been gradual, it has not only been sustained but has progressively increased. This is evidenced by the splendid increases in both imports and exports for the month of March, which show a proportionate advance in volume of trade hitherto unprecedented.
It is generally recognized that this depression and its blighting effects have been world wide. This fact of itself has had the tendency to produce a "depression psychology," followed by what might be termed a "depression weariness." The result is that we do not so readily recognize and properly appraise the incontrovertible evidences of reviving activity which have made their appearance.
These signs of improvements are so marked as to indicate beyond question that we are on the road to recovery. May we with renewed hope, fresh courage and firm step press on towards the goal of better and happier days which lie not far ahead.

[Stage Direction]
Mr. Speaker, I beg to give notice that when we are in committee of Ways and Means I will move the following resolutions:
Income War Tax Act
Resolved, that it is expedient to amend the Income War Tax Act and to provide:-
1.	That income shall include rents, royalties, reservations and other like considerations which fluctuate according to the production from or the use of the property leased or sold.
2.	That companies exempt from taxation under section four, paragraph (k) of the act
The Budget-Mr. Rhodes
[Stage Direction]
shall not be exempt if they fail to file, without reasonable cause therefor, within four months from the close of their fiscal period an annual return on the form prescribed, and at the same time pay a filing fee of one hundred dollars.
3.	That the exemption of $1,000 heretofore afforded a trustee accumulating income in trust for the benefit of unascertained persons or of persons with contingent interests shall be abolished.
4.	That interest, dividends, rents, royalties, annuities and other periodical payments received by executors and administrators of a deceased person shall be apportioned as if accruing from day to day and that portion accrued to the date of death shall be taxed as income of the deceased.
5.	That the amounts paid by an estate or trust for the upkeep, maintenance and taxes of any property which under the terms of the will or trust in question are required to be maintained for the use of life beneficiaries shall be taxable as income of such beneficiaries.
6.	That where any of the shares of a personal corporation are held by a non-resident shareholder, the company shall be taxable at the corporate rates of tax on such shareholder's proportionate interest in the income of the personal corporation.
7.	That income from assets transferred directly or indirectly by a taxpayer to minors shall continue to be taxed as the income of the taxpayer transferring the assets.
8.	That any enactment founded on this resolution shall be deemed to have come into force at the commencement of the 1933 taxation period and to be applicable thereto and to the fiscal periods ending therein, and to all subsequent periods.
Special War Revenue Act
Resolved, That it is expedient to introduce a measure to amend The Special War Revenue Act, chapter one hundred and seventy-nine of the revised statutes of 1927, and amendments thereto, and to provide as follows:
1.	That the excise tax imposed by section eighty and schedule II of the said act on the following items be repealed, namely:
Ale, beer, porter and stout;
Unfermented wort (sweet wort) suitable for the brewing of beer, (as imposed by section twenty-seven of chapter fifty of the statutes of 1932-33);
Malt syrup, or malt syrup powder, extracts of malt, fluid or not, or any other malt product suitable for the brewing of beer, (as imposed by said section twenty-seven).
(To be replaced by excise duties).
2.	That said Schedule II, as enacted by section twenty-seven of chapter fifty of the statutes of 1932-33, be further amended by striking thereout items (i) and (ii) and substituting the following:
(i)	Materials enumerated in customs tariff items 134, 135, 135 (a), 135 (b), 139 (except glucose and grape sugar) 140 (except molasses); invert sugar and syrup, lc. per pound;
(ii)	Glucose and grape sugar (except when for use exclusively in the manufacture of leather and artificial Bilk), 4c. per pound.
[Mr. Rhodes.!
3.	That schedule III to the said Act, being the list of articles exempted from the consumption or sales tax, as enacted by section twenty-eight of chapter fifty of the statutes of 1932-33, be amended as follows:
(a)	by deleting the words "when produced by any one manufacturer or producer to the value of not more than three thousand dollars in any one calendar year" where they appear after the words "bakers' cake and pies" at the end of the second paragraph of said schedule and by substituting the words "not to include biscuits, cookies or other similar articles";
(b)	by adding to the said schedule the following:
Sap spouts and sap buckets, evaporators and complete parts therefor, when for use exclusively in the production of maple syrup; Milk albumen, when for use exclusively in the production of animal or poultry feeds.
4.	That schedule V to the said act, as enacted by section thirty of chapter fifty of the statutes of 1932-33, containing list of exemptions from special excise tax imposed by section eighty-eight of the said act, as enacted by section twelve of chapter fifty-four of the statutes of 1932, be amended by adding thereto the following:
"Articles enumerated in customs tariff item 352 (a)".
5.	That subsection one of section seventy of the said act, as enacted by section ten of chapter fifty of the statutes of 1932-33, be repealed and the following substituted therefor:
70. (1) No postal note shall be issued under the provisions of The Post Office Act unless there is affixed thereto a postage stamp of the value of:
(i)	one cent if the amount of money for which the postal note is issued is not more than one dollar;
(ii)	three cents if the amount of money for which the postal note is issued exceeds one dollar;
to be paid for by the purchaser of the note.
6.	That subsection two of section seventy-seven A, as enacted by section twelve of chapter fifty of the statutes of 1932-33, be repealed and the following substituted therefor:
77A. (2) Except as hereinafter provided, every manufacturer and every importer of cigarette paper tubes shall affix to every package of cigarette paper tubes manufactured by him or imported by him into Canada, an excise stamp of the value of three cents for each one hundred cigarette paper tubes or fraction of one hundred cigarette paper tubes contained in such package.
7.	That subsection one of section eighty-tliree of the said act be amended by repealing paragraph (b) and substituting the following:
(b) a tax of seventy-five cents per gallon on champagne and all other sparkling wines.
8.	That section eighty-eight of the said act, as enacted by section twelve of chapter fifty-four of the statutes of 1932, be amended by adding thereto the following proviso:
Provided, further, that the said tax be at the rate of one and one-half per cent on all goods imported into Canada entitled to the benefit of the British preferential tariff or any lower tariff.

The Budget-Mr. Rhodes
9.	That there shall be imposed, levied and collected a tax of ten per centum on the value of gold deposited for sale at the Royal Canadian Mint, such value to be an amount calculated under regulations to be made by the governor in council on the basis of the sale price of gold in the world market converted into Canadian currency at the prevailing rates of exchange, the amount of the tax to be deducted from the value so determined before final settlement is made by the Mint with the depositor.
10.	That it shall be unlawful for any producer of gold from natural deposits in Canada to dispose of the same in quantities exceeding five ounces fine in any one week except by depositing it with the Royal Canadian Mint or the Dominion of Canada Assay Office, Vancouver, if such gold is in a form acceptable under the regulations for the receipt of gold bullion at the Royal Canadian Mint and that penalties be provided for violation of this provision.
11.	That no charges, except the charges imposed by the regulations for the receipt of gold bullion at the Royal Canadian Mint, shall be made by the Mint in respect of any gold subject to the Baid tax.
12.	That all gold exported in the form of ore, concentrates, or base bullion and all gold in manufacturers' sweeps so exported shall be subject to a like tax, under regulations to be made by the governor in council.
13.	That the said tax shall not operate so as to reduce the amount payable to the depositor or exporter below thirty dollars per ounce fine in currency of Canada.
14.	That any enactment founded on paragraphs one and two of this resolution shall come into force on the first day of July, one thousand nine hundred and thirty-four.
15.	That any enactment founded on paragraphs three, four and five of this resolution shall be deemed to have come into force on the nineteenth day of April, one thousand nine hundred and thirty-four.
16.	That any enactment founded on paragraphs six, seven and eight of this resolution shall be deemed to have come into force on the nineteenth day of April, one thousand nine hundred and thirty-four, and to have applied to all goods mentioned therein imported or taken out of warehouse for consumption on and after that day, and to have applied to goods previously imported for consumption for which no entry for consumption was made before that day.
17.	That any enactment founded on paragraphs nine to thirteen, inclusive, of this resolution shall be deemed to have come into force on the nineteenth day of April, one thousand nine hundred and thirty-four.
Excise Act
Resolved, That it is expedient to introduce a measure to amend the Excise Act, being chapter sixty of the revised statutes of Canada, 1927, and amendments thereto, and to provide:
1.	That the excise duty on malt be increased as follows:
(a)	On screened malt (malt from which
the coomings have been removed), manufactured in Canada subject to excise regulations
with respect to absorption of moisture in warehouse, from three cents per pound to seven and one-half cents per pound;
(b)	On malt imported into Canada and warehoused, from three cents per pound to seven and one-half cents per pound;
(c)	On malt imported into Canada, crushed or ground, from five cents per pound to nine and one-half cents per pound;
thereby consolidating as a single duty of excise the duties of excise now imposed upon malt used in the brewing of beer and the gallonage tax imposed under the Special War Revenue Act at the rate of twelve and one-half cents per gallon upon the beer itself, the said gallon-age tax to be repealed by an amendment to the Special War Revenue Act.
All duty-paid malt on hand in any premises subject to excise on the day this act comes into force to be subject to the difference between the rate already paid and that hereby imposed.
2.	(a) That the existing duty imposed on beer or any fermented beverage made in imitation thereof, brewed in whole or in part from any other substance than malt, be increased from fifteen cents per gallon to twenty-five cents per gallon, thereby maintaining the differential rate of duty between beer brewed by the use of malt and beer brewed by the use of other substances and combining with the said excise duty the gallonage tax imposed upon such liquor under the Special War Revenue Act.
(b)	That an excise duty be imposed on all beer imported into Canada and taken out of bond for consumption at the rate of twelve and one-half cents per gallon, to replace the excise tax imposed at the same rate under the Special War Revenue Act.
(c)	That an excise duty be levied upon all beer brewed from duty-paid malt in storage at the time of the coming into force of this Act at the rate of ten cents per gallon.
3.	That an excise duty be levied upon all unfermented wort (sweet wort) suitable for the brewing of beer in storage and unsold at the coming into force of this act, at the rate of ten cents per gallon, thereby equalizing the duty to be levied upon such sweet wort with the duty to be levied upon the malt entering into the production of sweet wort produced after the coming into force of the increased duty on malt hereby proposed; the tax imposed upon such wort under the Special War Revenue Act to be repealed.
4.	That excise duties be levied on all malt syrup suitable for the brewing of beer at the following rates:
(a)	When manufactured or produced in Canada prior to the coming into force of this act, per pound twenty cents;
(b)	When manufactured or produced in Canada after the coming into force of this act, per pound seventeen cents;
(c)	When imported into Canada or taken out of warehouse after the coming into force of this act, per pound twenty cents;
the above duties to replace the existing tax imposed by the Special War Revenue Act at the rate of twenty cents per pound, the reduction under (b) being to compensate for the increased duty on malt which enters into the production of such syrup.
The Budget-Mr. Rhodes
[Stage Direction]
5.	That any enactment founded on this resolution shall come into force on the first day of July, one thousand nine hundred and thirty-four.
Resolutions to Amend the Customs Tariff
1.	Resolved, That the Customs Tariff, being chapter forty-four of the revised statutes ot Canada, 1927, as amended by chapter thirty-nine of the Acts of 1929, chapter thirteen of the Acts of 1930 (first session), chapter three of the Acts of 1930 (second session), chapter thirty of the Acts of 1931, and chapters six and thirty-seven of the Acts of 1932-33, be further amended by striking thereout paragraph (j) of subsection (1) of section 2 thereof and by substituting therefor the following:
(j) "Proof", "proof spirit" or "proof spirits", means any spirit having the strength of proof by Sikes' hydrometer, that is, spirit which at the temperature of fifty-one degrees Fahrenheit weighs exactly twelve-thirteenths of the weight of an equal measure of distilled water at the same temperature.
2.	Resolved, That the aforesaid customs tariff be further amended by adding to section 5 thereof the following subsection:
(5) In computing the ad valorem rate of duty on tea purchased in bond in the United Kingdom, the value for duty shall not include the amount of the customs duty payable on tea for consumption in the United Kingdom.
3.	Resolved, That schedule A to the Customs Tariff, being chapter forty-four of the Revised Statutes of Canada, 1927, as amended by chapter seventeen of the Acts of 1928, chapter thirty-nine of the Acts of 1929, chapter thirteen of the Acts of 1930 (first session), chapter three of the Acts of 1930 (second session), chapter thirty of the Acts of 1931, chapter forty-one of the Acts of 1932, and chapters six and thirty-seven of the Acts of 1932-33, be further amended by striking thereout tariff items 99e, 180, 187, 203b, 207, 208e, 208g, 208u, 210d, 210e, 219 (ii), 242, 254, 267b, 278b, 278d, 294, 334, 339a, 353, 353a, 370, 375, 380, 392a, 409e (ii), 410d, 412, 414b, 445j, 471a, 472, 475, 511, 537, 537a, 551c, 651, 651a, 685, 709, 733, 811, 815, the several enumerations of goods respectively and the several rates of duties of customs, if any, set opposite each of the said items, and by inserting the following items, enumerations and rates of duty in said schedule A:

Tariff	British Preferential Tariff	Inter-	General Tariff	Present Rates	Item	mediate Tariff	B.P.	Int.	Gen.Tariff	Tariff	Tariff99e	Dates, n.o.p	per pound	I ct.	If cts.	25 cts.	1 ct.	If cts.	25 cts.When in packages weighing two pounds each, or	less, the weight of such packages to be included in the weight for duty.	117	Halibut livers, fresh	Free	Free	Free	15 p.c.	20 p.c.	25 p.c.180	Photographs, chromos, chromotypes, artotypes, oleographs, paintings, drawings, pictures, decal-comania transfers of all kinds, n.o.p., engravings or prints or proofs therefrom, and similar works of art, n.o.p.; blue-prints, building plans, maps, and	
15 p.c.	22} P-c.	225 p.c.	15 p.c.	225 P.c.	225 P-C.
180e	Decalcomania transfers, when imported for use exclu-						
	sively in the manufacture of tableware of china,	Free	10 p.c.	125 p.c.	15 p.c.	225 P.c.	225 p c.
187	Albumenized and other papers and films chemically prepared for photographers' use, n.o.p							
		15 p.c.	25 p.c.	30 p.c.	15 p.c.	25 p.c.	
187a	Hypersensitive or supersensitive panchromatic films,						
	unexposed, for aerial photography		Free	10 p.c.	15 p.c.	15 p.c.	25 p.c.	30 p.c.
203b	Aniline and coal tar dyes, adapted for dyeing, in bulk, or in packages of not less than one pound weight						
		Free	10 p.c.	10 p.c.	Free	10 p.c.	10 p.c.
	Provided, that when such dyes are permitted						
	entry into the United Kingdom, by licence, under Section (2) of the Dye-Stuffs Act (1920)						
the rates of duty shall ber	Free 10 p.c. Free	Free 5 p.c. 5 p.c.	Free 75 p.c. 7| p.c.	Free 10 p.c. 10 p.c.207	Dried blood, n.o.p	5 p.c. Free	75 p.c. Free	207b	Dried blood, soluble	
208e	Cresylic acid and compounds of cresylic acid, used						
	in the process of concentrating ores, metals or	Free	15 p.c.	15 p.c.	Free	„	15 p.c.
208g	Calcium molybdate, when imported for use exclusive-						
	ly in the manufacture of steel, under regulations prescribed by the minister		Free	Free	5 p.c.	Free 15 p.c.	Free 25 p.c.	5 p.c. 25 p.c.
208u	Xanthates and sulpho-thio-phosphoric (dithio-phos-						
	phoric) compounds, for use in the process of concentrating ores, metals or minerals				Free	Free Free Free Free 5 ct.	Free 15 p.c. 25 p.c. 25 p.c. 3/5 ct.	Free 15 p.c. 25 p.c. 25 p.c. 3/5 ct.
208v	Butyl alcohol, until October 15, 1934							
208w	Theobromine, crude, and dimethyl sulphate	Free 3/5 ct.	210d	Sodium, sulphate of, crude, or salt cake, per pound	1/5 ct.	3/5 ct.	
>
►d
>-I
tr*
[Stage Direction]
[DOT]9
The Budget-Mr. Rhodes
(Mr. Rhodes.]
Tariff
Item
210e
2 lGd
219e
24Gb
254a
267b
278c
278d
Nitrate of soda or cubic nitre when imported for use as a fertilizer, for use in the curing or pickling of meats or for use in the manufacture of vitreous glazes and enamel frits, or when imported by manufacturers of explosives for use exclusively in the manufacture of explosives, in their own factories..
Phthalic anhydride, adipic, abietic, maleic and succinic acids and ethylene glycol, when imported by manufacturers of synthetic resins, for use exclusively in the manufacture of synthetic resins, in their own
factories	
(ii) Solutions of hydrogen peroxide containing twenty-five per centum or more by weight of hydrogen peroxide	
British
Preferential
Tariff
Free
Free
Free
Mixtures containing cyanides, for use in combating
destructive insects and pests	 Free
Dry red lead, orange mineral and titanium oxide; zinc oxides such as zinc white and iithopone	 Free
Stains and oxides, valued at not less than 20 cents per pound, and liquid gold, for use exclusively as colouring constituents in the manufacture of vitreous enamels and pottery glazes	
Free
Gums, viz:-Arabic, Australian, copal, damar, elemi, kaurie, mastic, sandarac, Senegal, tragacanth, gedda, and barberry; gum chicle or sappato gum. crude; lac, crude, seed, button, stick and shell;
ambergris; Pontianac	
Gum, amber	
Crude petroleum not in its natural state, -7250 specific gravity or heavier at 60 degrees temperature, when imported by oil refiners to be refined in their own
factories	per gallon
Crude peanut oil, for refining for edible purposes, used
as materials in Canadian manufactures	
Olive oil for manufacturing soap or tobacco or for canning fish; olive oil for use in the processing of textile fibres, including the finishing of fabrics.
Free
Free
Free
Free
Free
Gypsum, ground, not calcined
10 p.c.
Inter- mediate Tariff	General Tariff	Present Rates	B.P. Tariff	Int. Tariff	Gen. TariffFree	Free	Free	Free	FreeFree	15 p.c.	20 p.c.Free	Free	Free	25 p.c.	25 p.c.22$ p.o.	25 p.c.	Free	22$ p.c.	25 p.c.Free	Free	Free	15 p.c.	15 p.c.15 p.c.	15 p.c.	Free	15 p.c.	15 p.c.15 p.c.	20 p.c.	22$ p.c.20 p.c.	22$ p.c.	15 p.c.	20 p.c.	22$ p.c.15 p.c.	22$ p.c.	25 p.c.15 p.c.	15 p.c.	Free	15 p.c.	15 p.c.Free	Free	Free	15 p.c.	15 p.c.1$ cts.	1$ cts.	$ ct.	1$ cts.	1$ cts.10 p.c.	10 p.c.	Free	Free	FreeFree	Free	Free	Free	FreeFree	20 p.c.	20 p.c.12$ p.c.	15 p.c.	10 p.c.	121 p.c.	15 p.c.
n
o
g
g
o
w
The Budget-Mr. Rhodes
[Stage Direction]
326c
T 320d
[Stage Direction]
334
339a
353a
362a
365a
365b
375
Concave blanks of uncoloured clear glass, when imported by manufacturers to be used exclusively in the manufacture of silvered mirror reflectors for lighting systems	 Beads, drops or other shapes of glass, when imported by manufacturers of imitation pearls, for use exclusively in the manufacture of such articles in their	Free
Kryolite or cryolite		Free
Lead capsules for bottles		Free
Aluminum and alloys thereof, crude or semi-fabricated, viz.: Pigs, ingots, blocks, notch bars, slabs, billets and blooms; bars, rods and wire; angles, channels, beams, tees and other rolled or drawn sections and shapes; pipes and tubes; plates, sheets and strips, including circles; leaf, n.o.p., or foil, less than -005 inch in thickness, plain or embossed, with or without backing; wire and cable, twisted or stranded, reinforced with steel or not; aluminum	
Aluminum leaf, less than -005 millimetres in thickness; aluminum scrap		Free
Provided, that nothing shall be deemed to be aluminum scrap except waste or refuse aluminum, fit only to be remelted. Metal parts, electro-plated, for loose-leaf binders....	20 p.c.
Findings of metal, not plated or coated, including stampings, trimmings, spring-rings, bolt-ring3, clasps, snaps, swivels, vest chain bars, joints, catches, pin tongues, buckle tongues, coil pins, clip actions, settings and eyepins, when imported by manufacturers of jewellery or ornaments for the adornment of the person, for use exclusively in the manufacture of such articles, in their own factories	15 p.c.
Wire or strip, viz.: Gold, gold-filled, silver, silver-filled, brass or nickel silver, knurled, twisted, figured or with ornamental design rolled or drawn thereon, and wire of nickel silver, plain, in >
oil or otherwise, when imported by manufacturers of jewellery or ornaments for the adornment of the person, for use exclusively in the manufacture of such articles, in their own factories		Free
Copper rollers, and stones, used in the printing of textile fabrics or wallpaper		Free
Ferro-alloys:- (a) Ferro-manganese, spiegeleisen and other alloys of manganese and iron containing not more than 1 per centum, by weight, of silicon-per pound, or fraction thereof, on the manganese contained therein		Free
10 p.o.	10 p.c.	15 p.c.	20 p.c.	22$ p.c.Free	Free	15 p.c.	20 p.c.	22$ p.c.Free	Free	Free	Free	FreeFree	25 p.c.	25 p.c.27$ p.c.	30 p.c.	10 p.c.	27$ P-c.	30 p.c.30 p.e.	30 p.c.	Free	30 p.c.	30 p.c.Free	Free	Free	Free	FreeFree	30 p.c.	30 p.c.37$ p.c.	45 p.c.	30 p.c.	37$ P.c.	45 p.c.25 p.c.	30 p.c.	25 p.c.	35 p.c.	40 p.c.30 p.c.	37$ p.c.	45 p.c.20 p.c.	25 p.c.	10 p.c.	30 p.c.	35 p.c.10 p.c.	10 p.c.	Free	10 p.c.	10 p.c.20 p.c.	30 p.c.	35 p.c.1 ct.	li cts.	Free	Free	Free
>
The Budget-Mr. Rhodes

Tariff	British	Inter-	General Tariff	Present Rates	Item	"	Preferential Tariff	mediate Tariff	B.P.	Int.	Gen.Tariff	Tariff	Tariff(b) Silico-manganese, silico spiegel and other alloys of manganese and iron containing more than 1 per centum, by weight, of silicon-per pound, or fraction thereof, on the manganese	contained therein	Free	If cts.	If cts.	Free Free	Free 5 p.c.	Free 5 p.c.(c) Ferro-silicon, being an alloy of iron and	
silicon containing 8 per centum or more, by weight, of silicon and less than 60 per centum-per pound,						
	or fraction thereof, on the silicon contained therein		Free	1£ cts.	If cts.	Free	71 p.c.	71 p.c.
							
(d) Ferro-silicon, being an alloy of iron and	Free	10 p.c.	10 p.c.silicon containing 60 per centum or more, by weight, of silicon and less than 90 per centum- per pound, or fraction thereof, on the silicon contained therein	Free	2f cts.	2f cts.	Free	10 p.c.	10 p.c.(e) Ferro-silicon, being an alloy of iron and	silicon containing 90 per centum or more, by weight, of silicon-per pound, or fraction thereof,	on the silicon contained therein	Free	5 cts.	51 cts.	15 p.c.	25 p.c.	25 p.c.(f) All alloys used in the manufacture of steel	Free	5 p.c.	5 p.c.	Free	380	Plates of iron or steel, hot or cold rolled:-	(a) Not more than 66 inches in width, n.o.p.	$4.25	$8.00	$8.00	$4.25	$8.00	$8.00(b)	More than 66 inches in width, n.o.p. .per ton (c)	Flanged, dished or curved, n.o.p	Free 10 p.c.	$6.00 25 p.c.	$6.00 30 p.c.	Free 10 p.c.	$6.00 25 p.c.	$6.00 30 p.c.Provided, that as regards subsection (b) of this	tariff item, the provisions of Section 6 of the	Customs Tariff Act shall not apply to importations under the British Preferential Tariff.	392a	Forgings of iron or steel, in any degree of manufacture,	hollow, machined or not, not less than 12 inches in	Free	30 p.c.	30 p.c.	Free 20 p.c. 15 p.c.	30 p.c. 271 P-c. 271 P-c.	30 p.c. 30 p.c.
409e	(ii) Fruit and vegetable grading, washing and wiping						
	machines and combination bagging and weighing	Free	10 p.c.	10 p.c.	Free 15 p.c.	10 p.c. 27£ p.c.	10 p.c. 35 p.c.
							
to
g
g
o
*
The Budget-Mr. Rhodes
74726-146$
410d
Well-drilling machinery and apparatus, and complete parts thereof, of a class or kind not made in Canada, and seamless iron or steel tubing over eight inches in diameter, for use exclusively in drilling for water, natural gas and oil, and in prospecting for minerals, but not to include motive power; packer rubbers for oil and gas wells	
Free
410n (ii) Complete parts for repairs for the coal-cutttng machines, n.o.p., enumerated in Tariff item 410n, when imported prior to January 1, 1935, and when for use exclusively in repairing coal-cutting machines
imported into Canada prior to January 1, 1933....
412 Machinery, being presses for use in the printing of newspapers, of not less value by retail than SI,500 each, of a class or kind not made in Canada, and complete parts thereof, not to include saws, knives and motive power	
Free
Free
441f Metal parts, n.o.p., when imported by manufacturers of shotguns, to be used exclusively in the manufacture of shotguns, in their own factories	
445j Electric dry shaving machines, of a class or kind not made in Canada, for use in removing human hair, I and complete parts thereof	
Free
Free
471a
475
494b
Pressed steel belt pulleys for power transmission, and finished or unfinished parts thereof, including interchangeable bushings	
Plates, rolls and cylinders engraved on wood, or on steel or other metal, and transfers taken from same, n.o.p.; engravers' plates, rolls and cylinders of steel or other metal, polished or otherwise processed, for engraving thereon or for transferring thereto from engraved plates	
Stereotypes, electrotypes and celluloids of books, and bases and matrices and copper shells for the same, whether composed wholly or in part of metal or celluloid; positive and negative films of periodical publications regularly issued at stated intervals as frequently as, at least, four times a year, not including catalogues	
Corkwood or corkbark in strips, for use in the manufacture of roller covers for textile machinery	
Fishing rods, walking sticks and walking canes, of all kinds; golf clubs and finished parts thereof; skis; racquets and racquet frames and baseball bats; balls of all kinds for use in sports, games or athletics, n.o.p	
Free
10 p.c.
Free
Free
20 p.c.
Free
Free
Free
17^ p.c. 10 p.c.
25 p.c.
15 p.c.
Free
Free
30 p.c.
Free	Free	Free	Free15 p.c.	25 p.c.	27* p.c.Free	Free	10 p.c.	10 p.c.Free	Free	Free	FreeFree	10 p.c.	15 p.c.25 p.c.	15 p.c.	27* p.c.	35 p.c.10 p.c.	Free	10 p.c.	10 p.c.15 p.c.	27* p.c.	35 p.c.27* p.c.	Free	25 p.c.	27* p.c.15 p.c.	27* p.c.	35 p.c.20 p.c.	10 p.c.	15 p.c.	20 p.c.15 p.c.	27* p.c.	35 p.c.Free	Free	Free	FreeFree	Free	17* p.c.	20 p.c.35 p.c.	20 p.c.	30 p.c.	35 p.c.
>
&
[Stage Direction]
to
8 t-'
The Budget-Mr. Rhodes

Tariff
Item
511a
523h
523i
537a
541 d
551c
558f
Cricket bats, balls, gloves and leg guards.
exclusively in the manufacture of sails for boats and ships, under regulations prescribed by the Minister
and	per pound
Filter cloth wholly of cotton, with cut pile, in the web or made up, imported for use exclusively in m'
and metallurgical operations	
and	per pound
Rovings, yarns and warps wholly or in part of vegetable fibres, not more advanced than singles, n.o.p.
not to contain silk, artificial silk nor wool....
Rovings, yarns and warps, wholly or in part of vegetable fibres, including yarn twist, cords and twines generally used for packaging and other purposes, n.o.p., not to contain silk, artificial silk nor wool.. Canvas in the web, wholly of flax or hemp or both, plain woven, not coloured, not further manufactured than impregnated with weather-proofing or preservative materials, suitable for manufacturing into tents, awnings, tarpaulins, hatch covers and similar articles, weighing not less than 18 ounces and not
more than 26 ounces per sq. yard	
and	per pound
Yarns and warps composed wholly of hair or of hair and any vegetable fibre, imported by manufacturers for use in their own factories	
and	per	poundNeedled hair	felt, imported by manufacturers	of felt
carpets and carpeting, for use exclusively in the manufacture of such felt carpets and carpeting, in
their own factories	
and	per	pound
Rovings, yarns and warps wholly of spun artificial silk or similar synthetic fibres produced by chemical processes, not coloured, imported by manufacturers for use exclusively in the manufacture of cutpile fabrics, in their own factories	
but not less	than	per	poundBritish Preferential Tariff	Inter- mediate Tariff	General Tariff	Present Rates	B.P. Tariff	Int. Tariff	Gen. TariffFree	30 p.c.	35 p.c.	20 p.c.	30 p.c.	35 p.c.17$ p.c.	22$ p.c.	25 p.c.25 p.c.	25 p.c.	45 p.c.Free	20 p.c.	25 p.c.	17$ p.c.	20 p.c.	25 p.c.cts.	4 cts.	2 cts.	3$ cts.	4 cts.10 p.c.	30 p.c.	35 p.c.	25 p.c.	30 p.c.	35 p.c.3? cts.	4 cts.	2 cts.	3^ cts.	4 cts.Free	m pc.	25 p.c.	12$ p.c.	17$ p.c.	25 p.c.27$ p.c.	30 p.c.	32$ p.c.	20 p.c.	22$ p.c.	25 p.c.15 p.c.	30 p.c.	35 p.c.	25 p.c.	30 p.c.	35 p.3£ cts.	4 cts.	3 cts.	3$ cts.	4 cts.Free	17^ p.c.	20 p.c.	Free	17$ p.c.	20 p.c.and	15 cts. per lb.	17$ cts. per lb.15 cts.	17$ cts.	10 p.c.	17$ p.c.	20 p.c.and	7$ cts. per lb.	15 cts. per lb.	17$ cts. per lb.Free	. 10 p.c.	10 p.c.	30 p.c.	40 p.c.	40 p.c.15 cts.	17$ cts.	18$ cts.	32$ cts.	35 cts.Free	30 p.c.	35 p.c.	25 p.c.	30 p.c.	35 p.c.28 cts.	28 cts.	28 cts.	28 cts.	28 cts.
o
g
g
o
co
The Budget-Mr. Rhodes
597b
616c
651
651a
663d
709
Harps	
Liquid rubber compound, non-alcoholic, when imported by manufacturers of sealing compounds for cans and jars, for use exclusively in the manufacture of such sealing compounds, in their own factories.. (ii) Materials, when imported by manufacturers of artificial feathers, fruits, grains, leaves and flowers, for use exclusively in the manufacture of such articles, in their own factories	
Free
Free
20 p.c.
Buttons of all kinds, covered or not, and button blanks other than in the rough, n.o.p.; recognition
buttons and cuff or collar buttons	
and	per gross
20 p.c. 5 cts.
Buttons, and button blanks other than in the rough,
of vegetable ivory	
and	per gross
20 p.c. 5 cts.
Soya beans, when imported by manufacturers of milk foods for human consumption, for use exclusively . in the manufacture of such milk foods, in their own factories, until September 30, 1934	
Free
Pantagraphs and parts thereof, including diamond points, and engraving mills, for engraving copper rollers used in printing textiles and wallpapers; blankets, blanketing and lapping imported for use exclusively by textile manufacturers and wallpaper printers	
Free
Articles and other goods, the growth, produce or manufacture of Canada, returned to the exporter thereof after haying been exported without having been advanced in value or improved in condition by any process of manufacture or other means; also quick-silver flasks, and other metallic receptacles or holding liquids, oyster pails, and impact registers or recorders for use in railway cars, after having been once exported from Canada	
Free
Provided that the said articles and goods are returned within five years from time of exportation, subject to regulations prescribed by the Minister:
27? p.c
Free
275 p.c
35 p.c. 5 cts.
35 p.c. 10 cts.
Free
Free
Free
30 p.c.
20 p.c.
30 p.c.
Free
27$ p.c.
35 p.c. 5 cts.
35 p.c. 10 cts.
Free
Free
Free
27$ p.c.
15 p.c.
25 p.c.
27$ p.c.
27$ p.c.	40 p.c.
and	
10 cts.
45 p.c. per yard 10 cts.
27$ p.c.	40 p.c.
and	
30 cts.	40 cts.
45 p.c. per pound 40 cts.
20 p.c. 5 cts. 15 p.c.
20 p.c. 5 cts. 15 p.c.
Free
35 p.c. 5 cts. 25 p.c.
35 p.c. 10 cts. 25 p.c.
1$ cts.
35 p.c. 5 cts. 25 p.c.
35 p.c. 10 cts. 25 p.c.
2 cts. per pound
%
s
r
oo
Free 15 p.c. 15 p.c.
Free 25 p.c. 27$ p.c.
Free 25 p.c. 35 p.c.
Free 20 p.c.
Free 30 p.c.
Free 35 p.c.
The Budget-Mr. Rhodes

Tariff Item	British	Inter-	General Tariff	Present Rates	Preferential Tariff	mediate Tariff	B.P. Tariff	Int. Tariff	Gen. TariffSll	Provided also that any article or goods described in this paragraph, upon which an allowance of drawback has been made, shall not be admitted to entry except upon payment of duties equal to the drawback allowed; Provided further that any of such goods or articles manufactured in bond or under Excise regulations in Canada and exported shall not be admitted to entry except upon payment of the Customs or Excise duties to which they would have been liable had they not been exported from Canada. Ceramic insulator cores, not further manufactured than burned and glazed, printed or decorated or not, without fittings, when imported by manufacturers of spark plugs for use exclusively in the manufacture of spark plugs, in their own factories..	5 p.c.	10 p.c.	15 p.c.	5 p.c.	10 p.c.	15 p c.815	Potato starch or potato flour enumerated in Tariff Item 39 of the Customs Tariff, when imported for use as material in Canadian manufactures, the weight of the package to be included in the weight for duty, until July 31, 1934	per pound	$ ct.	1 ct.	1 ct.	15 p.c. | ct.	25 p.c. 1 ct.	27J p.c. 1 ct.
£
a
o
£
[Stage Direction]
o
tri
HHHHi

The Budget-Mr. Rhodes

The Budget-Mr. Rhodes
4. Resolved, that Schedule B to the Customs Tariff, being chapter forty-four of the Revised Statutes of Canada, 1927, be amended by striking thereout Tariff Items 1049, and 1055, the enumerations of goods and the rates of drawback of Customs Duties set opposite to each of the said items, and by inserting the following items, enumerations and rates of drawback of Customs Duties in said Schedule B:-
Item
No.
Goods
When Subject to Drawback
Portion of Duty (Not including Special Duty or Dumping Duty) Payable as Drawback
Bituminous coal
When imported by manufacturers of coke and converted into coke in their own
plants	
Provided that drawback payable under this item is in lieu of drawback payable under any other item.
50 p.c.
(a) Materials and Parts, n.o.p.
(b) Materials and Parts, as hereunder defined, including all materials or parts wrought into or attached thereto: engines, bodies in the white, chassis frames, hoods, plated radiator shells, splash shields, gas tank shields, gasoline feed pipes, die castings, plated or not, and front and rear fenders, finished or not.
When used in the manufacture of goods enumerated in tariff items 438a and 438 b	
When used in the manufacture of goods enumerated in tariff items 438a and 438b	
(1)	Provided, that no drawback shall hereafter be paid under this item unless at least fifty per centum of the cost of producing the finished article, not to include, after September 30, 1931, duties paid upon imported materials, has been incurred in Canada;
(2)	Provided further, that no drawback shall be paid under this item on importations of any of the undermentioned articles:
Anti-squeak braids and strips; axles, front; axles, rear (not to include banjo housing); batteries; bearings, thrust, ball or plain; belts (fan); bodies, painted or trimmed; bolts; brakes, service or emergency; brake lever; brake lining; brake pedals and operating levers; bumpers; bumperettes; cold rolled cowl, roof drip, side and top mouldings; cold rolled running board mouldings, glass channels, belt moulding and hinges; caps (wheel hub); carpets; castings (sand); chassis springs, between frame and axles; circuit breakers; clamps (hood); clevis pins; clocks, stem winding; clutch; clutch pedals; cotter pins; dash liner assemblies; distributors; drag links; drums (wheel); exhaust pipes; electric generators; electric wiring and cables; electric light bulbs; fans (motor); fasteners,carpet and curtain; felt parts; finished strips (window); floor boards (wood); foot rests; forgings, drop, rolled,or pressed; gas tanks; gear shift levers; gear shift lever knobs; glove compartments; hubs; ignition
60 p.c.
25 p.c.
The Budget-Mr. Rhodes
[Stage Direction]
Item
No.
Goods
When Subject to Drawback
Portion of Duty (Not including Special Duty or Dumping Duty) Payable as Drawback
Plate glass enumerated in tariff item 322, on which duty was paid at the rates of duty set opposite said item.
coils; jacks; lamps (head, side, tail and dome) but not including lenses; laminated glass; lubrication fittings; mirrors (rear view);moulded rubber parts; mufflers; nuts; paints; lacquers and thinners; propeller shafts; pyroxylin covered or double top fabric, and enamelled oilcloth; radiator cores; robe rails; rubber tubing; running boards; running board covers; rivets; screws; shock absorbers; solder; spark plugs; springs, coil and seat; stampings of metal (except radiator shell, cowl and body stampings); starter switches; starting motors; starting units; steering gears; studs; tacks; tires (rubber); tire carriers; tire covers; tool kit equipment; tops, and curtains for same; transmissions; Universal joints; upholstering fabrics and materials, other than printed fabrics; varnishes; visors; washers, plain; wheels, including hubs and drums; wheel carriers; wheel rims; windlaces; window shades; windshields, complete; windshield frames and metal parts; wood parts for bodies.
(3)	Provided further, that on all materials and parts used in the manufacture in Canada of the parts enumerated in Proviso. (2) to this Item there shall be payable, when such parts are used in the manufacture of the goods enumerated in tariff items 438a and 438b, a drawback of duty for domestic purposes of	
(4)	Provided further, that any claims for drawback that have accrued or may accrue up to and including the 30th day of September, 1931, shall be paid in accordance with the provisions of the Tariff as existent on the 25th day of May, 1931.
(5)	Provided further, that the Governor in Council may make such regulations, if any, as are deemed recessary for carrying out the provisions of this tariff item.
When used in the manufacture of safety or non-shatterable glass	
25 p.c.
99 p.c.
5. Resolved, that .Schedule C to the Customs	Statutes of Canada, 1927, be amended by adding
Tariff, being chapter forty-four of the Revised	thereto the following item:-
Smoke screen apparatus, for use on motor vehicles or on water-borne craft of all kinds.
6. Resolved, that any enactment founded upon the foregoing resolutions to amend the Customs Tariff or Schedules thereto shall be deemed to have come into force on the nineteenth day of April, one thousand nine hundred and thirty-four, and to have applied to all goods mentioned in the foregoing resolutions imported or taken 
out of warehouse for consumption on and after that date, and to have applied to goods previously imported for which no entry for consumption was made before that date.
On motion of Mr. Ralston the debate was adjourned.

Marketing Act-Mr. Brown


[Stage Direction]
The house resumed from Tuesday, April 17, consideration of the motion of Mr. Weir (Melfort), for the second reading of Bill No. 51, to improve the methods and practices of marketing of natural products in Canada and in export trade, and to make further provisions in connection therewith.
Mr. J. L. BROWN (Lisgar):: Mr. Speaker,
the first speaker after the delivery of the budget undoubtedly suffers some handicap and possibly what I have to say may seem to be somewhat of an anticlimax after the important matters that have been dealt with by the Minister of Finance (Mr. Rhodes). I hope, however, I shall be able to present arguments that may be of some interest why this marketing bill should not meet with the approval of the house.
When I moved the adjournment of the debate last night I had been discussing some of the reasons our cooperative institutions had failed. I was led to do that because of certain remarks that had been made by the Minister of Agriculture (Mr. Weir) in introducing the bill. But despite some apparent failures of cooperatives, I believe there is still hope for carrying on the business of the country and marketing our agricultural produce by means of our cooperative organizations. I v'as rather surprised at the admission made by the Minister of Agriculture when, although he said that he favoured cooperative institutions, he made this statement:
I personally believe that in large measure the organized trade, trained as it is in the specialized business of getting the product from the producer to the consumer, is the best and cheapest method of carrying on the business.
In view of the minister's statement that he favoured the carrying on of business through our cooperative institutions, I was surprised that he should have made such an admission. I believe we have some outstanding examples of successful businesses being carried on through our cooperative institutions. I might refer to such companies as the Saskatchewan Cooperative Elevator Company and the United Grain Growers, to my mind two companies that were an outstanding success in rendering service to the grain producer.
It would be very interesting, if we had time, to review the history of those two companies and to show that they were able to function with the minimum of government support. The United Grain Growers which
began business as the Grain Growers' Grain Company was entirely voluntary in its organization. It was able to carry on its work and to succeed in spite of the keenest opposition that was offered to it by the railway companies, the grain trade, the banks, and, I must say, some members of this house. I was not in parliament then but I had the privilege of reading Hansard and I recall some of the opposition that was voiced against that company, an opposition led by no less a man than the Minister of Trade and Commerce (Mr. Stevens). Just look at the debates that took place in the house in the year 1920 and see the attitude of that minister toward that great company at that time. The Saskatchewan Cooperative Elevator Company came on the ground somewhat later. Unfortunately it was killed, one reason being, as I pointed out last night, a disposition to pull down something already established and to put something else in its place. The same forces tried to kill the United Grain Growers, but fortunately they were not successful. Those two companies from their very inception had the advantage of being controlled by sound business men, the United Grain Growers first by the Hon. Thomas Crerar and later by Mr. R. S. Law; the Saskatchewan Cooperative Elevator Company by such an outstanding business man as Mr. C. H. Dunning, followed by Mr. Fred. Riddell. I shall, however, not have time to deal with those companies at any length except to say that they were under good business management and were conducted according to sound business principles.
To come to the bill, I am asked what my objections are to it. My objection is that it proposes to set up a bureaucracy that would undertake to regulate the production and marketing of agricultural products. It proposes to give to the minister, acting only under an order in council without any reference to parliament, power to step in and take control of the marketing of any product he sees fit. If there is any doubt on that question let us turn to clause 9 of the bill which has already been read by the hon. member for Comox-Alberni (Mr. Neill). That clause gives to a minister, whoever he may be, power to step in and take under his control the marketing of any product. This to my mind is the most obnoxious feature of the bill; it takes control entirely away from parliament. We are asked to deliver over to a minister and to certain boards that may be set up entire control of the marketing of agricultural products. Are we not going too far in this direction, taking away from parliament the control that ought to rest in it? I am quite willing to admit
Marketing Act-Mr. Brown

that in time of emergency a government may seek power to act during the recess, power which under ordinary circumstances they would not seek. But such power should be reduced to the absolute minimum and in such a case as this nobody will contend that there is an emergency or that there is any reason parliament should divest itself of authority and hand those powers over to a minister or to boards that are set up under this legislation.
But we have been told by those who defend this bill that those powers may not be exercised by the government. All I can say is that no government has a right to ask and no parliament has a right to grant powers that may not be exercised. No doubt this bill will receive the approval of those who have the mania for planning, who labour under the delusion that all activities of agriculture can be made to fit into a plan. To them that term "planned economy" has a very pleasing and comforting sound, it is like the old lady who said the blessed word "Mesopotamia" gave her great comfort. So this idea of planned economy is a very pleasing thought to certain members of this house and to large numbers of people outside. But I think they should give some thought to the question of just how far a planned economy is workable; to plan simply for the sake of planning is not likely to accomplish anything.
This bill has been declared to be a simple bill. Now simple and complex are relative terms. I suppose the binomial theorem is a simple matter to those who are experts in higher mathematics, but it is a very complex matter to those of us whose mathematics do not go beyond the multiplication table. To some the Einstein theory may be simple, but I think that most members of this house would admit that they understand little about it. So as to this being a simple measure I would say that on the contrary it is a very complex one.


Mr. ILSLEY:: It is simply appalling.


John Livingstone Brown: I am inclined to think, on the other hand, that simplicity would not commend it to the minds of many who seem to see virtue in a thing in proportion to its complexity. There is a disposition to refuse to take simple and obvious means of correcting some of our difficulties, and to seek an elaborate plan. I am reminded of one of Mark Twain's stories, the incident told, I think, in Hucklebeny Finn. It may be remembered that Jim. the slave, had been apprehended and locked up in a shanty because he was thought to be a runaway. Tom Sawyer comes on the scene. The fact was that Jim was not a runaway slave, he had already gained his

freedom, but Tom Sawyer had a flair for the dramatic and he could not rest satisfied with merely letting it be known that Jim was a free man and not a runaway, so he had to devise some dramatic and elaborate means for securing Jim's escape. I often think that some of our legislators are like Tom Sawyer in that respect.
The minister has given as one reason for supporting this bill the desirability of securing a high class product. We are all agreed that, we should have a grading system that will secure a high class product, but we do not need this bill to accomplish that.


Mr. MOTHERWELL:: Hear, hear. Nothing to do with it.


John Livingstone Brown: We have already established means for the grading of our agricultural products, and I think the Minister of Agriculture, as well as the former minister, will agree that I for my part, and I believe nearly all the members of this house, have given all possible encouragement to the grading system. The only opposition I have heard to grading agricultural products has come from the hon. member for Marquette (Mr. Mullins) and some Tory members from eastern Canada. This bill is not needed to encourage the production of high class products. But when it comes to regulating the production and marketing of our products it is an entirely different matter. This bill proposes to put into the hands of certain boards the power to do two things; or at least to confer upon them the right to attempt to do certain things which I do not believe any man or group of men can possibly do. Those two things are, first to decide equitably as between man and man, community and community and province and province the amount of goods that each shall put on the market. I see there the possibility of great friction, the possibility of difference arising between the provinces that may strain the bonds of confederation. Let us suppose for a moment that the apple growers of British Columbia view a certain course of action as being in their interest, the apple growers of Ontario take another view, and the apple growers of Nova Scotia still another. Let us suppose that they all want to get into the prairie market. As a consumer of fruit on the prairies I want to see that we can get the kind of apples we want. Yet this board which is to be brought into existence is to have the power to say that British Columbia apples can go to such and such a place, Ontario apples to another place and Nova Scotia apples to another place. It may be just

Marketing Act-Mr. Brown
a prejudice but it is an idea that is strongly held on the prairies, especially among those who came from old Ontario, that Ontario apples are just a little better than British Columbia apples.


Richard Bedford Bennett: What about Nova Scotia
apples?


John Livingstone Brown: I have not had the privilege of eating many Nova Scotia apples! There was one year in which they came west, and we would be very glad to have the privilege of buying Nova Scotia apples if we find them better than other apples. But under this bill there is the possibility of this board thinking it its duty to attempt to regulate the direction in which apples from these various communities shall go. To my mind that power is fraught with great danger. Then this bill proposes to give to these boards power to regulate the amount that each shall produce and the amount that each shall market. Think of the difficulties involved in that proposition. There is a proposal to-day that each farmer shall be allowed a quota of wheat. What is the first, difficulty that arises? Some farmers have not had a crop for four or five years, others have perhaps had fairly good crops continuously, others again have not had a crop for three years, two years or one year. The first thing the board which undertakes to work out this quota equitably comes up against is the question, how is it going to treat the man who has had no crop for four or five years but who may possibly have a good crop this coming year? Is he to be on the same basis as the man who has had good crops continuously? Then when they come to decide what goods shall be held off the market and what shall be allowed to go on the market, there is another difficulty. The Minister of Agriculture knows perfectly well that in the raising of hogs there is a certain point at which the hogs must be marketed, otherwise they are kept at a loss. Who is going to pay that loss? It has been suggested that it may be borne by a pool. But these matters lead to such complication that I do not think it would be possible for this or any government or any board that could be set up to deal with the matter equitably.
The minister mentioned the possibility of the poor veal calf not reaching the market in proper time. If there is one pathetic thing in the handling of live stock it is to hear a calf which has been taken away from its mother bawling in the stock yards. But this bill does not deal with that matter. It does not offer the slightest suggestion as to how the misfortunes or the sufferings of the calf may be relieved. There is no such suggestion in. the bill.
When we come to the production of agricultural products we find that the difficulties of control are infinitely greater. Who will undertake to say what the harvest next fall will be from the crop being sown this spring? Who will undertake to determine accurately how much of any given product each man will produce. Whether the production be through the assignment of a quota or a reduction of acreage it will take an army of men to see that these regulations, whatever they may be, are put into effect. Even then, taking into account the uncertainties of the weather, the possibility of hail storms, drought and grasshoppers, and the further possibility that one man may be a better farmer than another, who will undertake to decide between these men, on an equitable basis?


The ACTING SPEAKER (Mr. MacDonald, Cape Breton):: The hon. member has spoken forty minutes.


John Livingstone Brown: I think I have not. I had twenty-five minutes left.


Mr. CASGRAIN:: The hon. member spoke only ten minutes last night.


Mr. GOTT:: It does not matter; go ahead.


Joseph Philippe Baby Casgrain: Go ahead.


Richard Bedford Bennett: You are not the timekeeper.


Finlay MacDonald: By unanimous consent the
hon. member may proceed.


Richard Bedford Bennett: It is so seldom that we
hear the hon. member I suggest that he be allowed to proceed.


John Livingstone Brown: Let us suppose that I have a flock of sheep. All hon. members know that some sheep are very prolific while others are not. One ewe may produce one lamb, others may produce two, and others may have triplets. That is a matter beyond the regulation of mankind. What are we to do with the excess numbers? Are we to kill them? Then, the Minister of Agriculture knows perfectly well the uncertainties in connection with the rearing of little pigs. These are some matters beyond our control.
I do not wish to trespass unduly, but I should like to conclude with only one remark. Perhaps the most obnoxious part of the bill appears at page 3. It is as follows:
The board shall, subject to the provisions of this act, have power-
(g) to require full information relating to the production and marketing of the natural product from all persons engaged therein and to require periodic returns to be made by such persons, and inspect the books and premises of such persons.
Marketing Act-Mr. Brown

I do not believe our farmers are prepared to submit to such legislation as that. In that connection may I read a short letter written by a farmer to the Winnipeg Free Press:
Eighty miles north of Carlyle there is an Indian reserve. An agent and a farm instructor tell the Indians what to do and how, when and why to do it.
They are told what to plant and how and where to plant it. If they have something to sell they must secure a permit from the agent. If they are short of funds the agent may give them an order for goods on the local store and later he will sell their produce to foot the bill.
How about the farmer under the new marketing Act? Well, he is placed squarely on the 'Indian list." If the government chooses to take the farmer-and' why should it be embodied in the act if they never intend to use it-every thing I have described as applying to the Indian, will apply to the farmer.
He will not be allowed to raise a chicken, cow or pig or sell a bushel of wheat or a dozen of eggs without a permit from some government agent.
Are the farmers of western Canada going to stand for that kind of treatment? If they do then we can come to but one conclusion, that the government is fully justified in putting them on the "Indian list."
G. W. Stockton. Carlyle, Sask., April 10, 1934.
I am prepared to go a certain distance to meet a situation such as has developed in British Columbia in connection with fruit. Recognizing as I do the rights of majority control, I am prepared to go some distance in that regard, although I do not like to interfere with personal liberty. In view of the situation which has developed in that province, if by a large majority the fruit growers are willing to do certain things and they obtain the sanction of the provincial government, as a member of this House of Commons I would be willing to go as far as our constitution will allow to give them the right to handle their produce in the manner they themselves have decided it should be handled. I am willing to go that far. Then, if a majority of the farmers on the prairies decide to adopt some kind of board to control their live stock or their dairy produce, while as a citizen of Manitoba I might and undoubtedly in some cases would object, as a member of this house I should feel obligated under the circumstances I have described to give them the right to do so. That is an entirely different thing, however, from beginning at the top and giving to this or to any government or any board the right to take all these matters under its control. I am entirely opposed to parliament resigning its powers into the hands of any board or executive.
Reference has been made to the British Marketing Act. I am not going to say I

am in favour of that act. England is a country entirely different from Canada, and the circumstances obtaining there are quite different from those obtaining in this country. That which may suit England, a small compact country, may not suit us at all. Therefore at the moment I am not prepared to say that I would support legislation in this House of Commons simply because it followed closely the British marketing legislation. 1 am prepared, however, to take specific cases as they arise and to deal with them as the circumstances demand. I am not prepared to throw over our established method of doing things and at once to institute a new method. I believe in orderly progress, here a little and there a little, dealing with situations as they arise. That to my mind is the attitude which will commend itself to the people of Canada.


Mr. F. H. PICKEL (Brome-Missisquoi):: Mr. Speaker, I wish to congratulate the government on the attitude it has taken as reflected in the marketing bill now before the house. For two or three years we have been talking about arrangements which should be made for the orderly marketing of our produce. We are now trying to put through this house a bill which will bring about that which we desired. Several lawyers opposite have expressed their opinions, and we have had opinions from other hon. members opposite who know nothing about marketing or the conditions under which the eastern farmers operate. They are familiar with the selling and marketing of wheat, but they are totally ignorant of and do not understand the facts and conditions affecting the marketing of the produce of eastern farmers.
Some members of the opposition have spoken of this as a bill with teeth in it.


Mr. MERCIER (St. Henri):: False teeth.


Follin Horace Pickel: We require a bill with
teeth in it, double teeth all around in both jaws. At the present time the packers and the commission men have absolute control of the marketing of the farmers' products in the east, and anything that can be done to take control out of their hands I am willing and glad to support. The minister distinctly stated when introducing the bill that he did not regard it as perfect, but that it was a beginning. I should like to know what kind of bill could be brought in by the minister or by anybody on this side of the house that hon. gentlemen opposite would agree to. They have not agreed to a single clause of this marketing bill; they have found fault with it all.

Marketing Act-Mr. Picket
I just want to give a few facts that I know. This criticism from the other side of the house is simply for political purposes. The hon. member for Lisgar (Mr. Brown) stated a few moments ago that we have grading acts at the present time and he knew of no one who was opposed to them except perhaps the hon. member for Marquette (Mr. Mullins) and eastern farmers. Well, Mr. Speaker, I am an eastern farmer and I am opposed most strongly, not to the grading acts themselves, but to their administration and operation. That is what I am opposed to.
Because of the grading acts and because of the arbitrary action of the packers and commission men in the cities the price of eggs, for example, fluctuates. When the farmer has none to sell the price is high, but during the producing season all summer the price is depressed. I contend that the price of a dozen eggs or a pound of butter in this country should never go below twenty-five cents. The price should be more or less uniform. Why should the price be depressed?
In the spring of the year when the farmer begins to produce butter, which is his chief commodity, the commission men and the packers arbitrarily depress the price and keep it depressed all summer just so long as the farmer is producing, and while the price is kept low they fill up their warehouses. But the minute the farmer stops producing, up goes the price, and butter will be selling at forty cents a pound and eggs at fifty cents a dozen when the farmer has none to sell. That is the condition of the eastern farmer, and I say that these marketing conditions should be regulated. The packers in the cities know perfectly well that on all the butter and eggs they buy during the summer they are going to double and treble their money. In this country we consume all the butter and eggs that we produce. We are not exporting butter and eggs, and why should the packers be allowed arbitrarily to depress prices to suit their own purposes, in order to make millions next winter? You will see that they will repeat the old trick pretty soon now; you will see butter and eggs soon go down to the lowest point. Eggs will be selling for ten or twelve cents a dozen this summer and the packers will be filling up their cold storage warehouses at that price. That is what the farmer is up against. And the packers will buy butter at fifteen and sixteen cents this summer and sell it at 30 to 35 cents a pound next winter. Is there any justice in that? Do we not need a marketing board? I should think we do, and one with teeth in it.
The condition of the eastern farmer is almost as bad in marketing beef and meat
products as it is with respect to butter and eggs. The man in the city does not realize it. He gets his meat at very reasonable prices, but the man in the country pays right up to the hilt.


Paul Mercier: What about the man in the city?


Follin Horace Pickel: You can get it much cheaper than I can get it in my village where we are producing the goods; you can get it twenty-five to thirty per cent cheaper. It a man in the eastern townships has a beef animal to sell he cannot sell it to the local butcher because there is none; the local butcher has been put out of business by the packers. The small local butcher might operate for a little while until the packer comes along and puts somebody right down beside him and gives him his meat until the other man is put out of business. That is what they are doing. I tell you straight that I can go on St. Catherine street and buy meat products twenty-five to thirty per cent cheaper than I can in any small village in the east.


Paul Mercier: That must be the cheaper meats.


Follin Horace Pickel: Every kind of meat, fish and everything. In the larger towns like Granby, Waterloo and Farnham, where there is some competition provided by the Dominion stores and Atlantic and Pacific stores, prices are a little more reasonable, but in the smaller towns where there is no competition and the packer has control we pay right up to the hilt. The farmer cannot sell his beef animals to the butcher; he has to sell them to the local agent of the packer, who transports them to Montreal where they are slaughtered, and we have to pay the transportation charges in and out, and one or two abattoir charges are charged back to us.


Mr. YOUNG:: Is this bill going to remedy that?


Follin Horace Pickel: The packer is the cause of it all.


Joseph Philippe Baby Casgrain: Is this bill going to fix that up?


Follin Horace Pickel: It should. Let us try it. I am willing to try anything.
Last session I introduced a resolution into this house on behalf of the United Farmers of Danville in the province of Quebec in regard to the sale of reactors. I want to say a word or two on that subject. The request at that time was that all these reactors should be sent direct to the fertilizer factory. Let me give the house my experience. In 1928
Marketing Act-Mr. Picket

or the early part of 1929, on one of my farms I lost five head of cattle. They were large Holsteins. A neighbour also lost five cattle, but his were common grade cattle. They were were not nearly as large as mine and not in as good condition. His cattle and mine were sent to Montreal on the same day. This neighbour of mine telephoned to one of the inspectors of the department in Montreal and told him that he was shipping cattle. He asked him to go down to the abattoir to see that he got somewhere near their value. A man was sent down and this neighbour received $25 per head for his five head. My five head went through the local dealer; I had no one at the abattoir and I received only $24 for the five.


Edward James Young: Exactly the same cattle?


Follin Horace Pickel: Mine were better. In July last year a neighbour of mine sold a three year old heifer for beef. He was sending milk to the city and he feeds all his cattle quite heavily. At the same time he was selling two or three hogs and some young cattle. When he got to Montreal the buyer came round to look at his animals and the price offered for the hogs and calves was quite acceptable. He then asked about his heifer and the dealer said he would pay $20 for the animal. Under the rules I could not repeat the language of the owner of the heifer when he heard the price offered. He said, "Are you trying to be a philanthropist, or what"? The dealer told him he considered the animal was worth more than $20 but that they had to sell the animal. That is the position they take. Last December I lost four head on another farm and all I could get was $4, just enough to buy a can of disinfectant. That is the position we in eastern Canada are up against. I do not know anything about the wheat situation and I am sorry that the wheat market is as it is. I do not know whether this proposed marketing board can help out in disposing of the wheat, but I do know that it can help in eastern Canada to dispose of everything that we produce.
The hon. member for Lisgar referred to the grading acts, and it is these very acts that these people take advantage of. I am not against grading; I believe our goods should be graded, but I do object to the manner in which these grading acts are used by the middleman in order to beat the farmer. I have mentioned already the case of eggs which I returned to Montreal. That could be repeated any day. You can send into the city and get a case of eggs and then

when you send it back you will not get more than half what you paid for them; the grading will be depressed by fifty per cent. Such a condition of things should be readjusted. The hon. member for Lisgar said that there was no emergency and that the powers granted under this act were too great to be given to any board. I contend that emergency exists and has existed for some time.
The principal products of the farmer in the east are milk, cream, butter, eggs and pork. I think we are in a fair way to getting some adjustment in the matter of milk and cream. I understand a milk commission has been appointed in Ontario. We have one in Quebec which has power to set prices. The Minister of Agriculture for Quebec is to be highly commended for this action. We believe that the farmer will now get a fifty-fifty division of the consumer's dollar. I do not know what is going to be done in Ontario. As far as butter and eggs are concerned, the farmer does not get a fair deal and these are two of his principal products.
While I am on my feet I might say that I have always advocated the manufacture of more cheese and less butter, and I should like to tell the house why I am of that opinion. The price of cheese is regulated on the British market, but the price of butter is fixed in Montreal. The eastern townships farmer who sends his milk to a creamery does not receive more than fifty per cent of its value. The creamery does its own testing and weighing and the farmer has not a chance. Here is an instance of the way we are treated. Three years ago I was sending cream from one of my farms to a certain creamery and it was testing 35 per cent. The creamery changed hands and within six months the test had dropped to 22 per cent. I said to the man on the farm, "Joe, they are stealing your cream." He said, "I know they are, but what can we do about it?" I told him that I would have a different truck come into my yard every day or every week if necessary. Without my knowledge he sent his cream to Eaton's in Montreal and the first test showed 42 per cent. During the past two years it has never been below 40 per cent. That is what the farmer in the east is up against.
There is a contention which I have made before to which many take objection, namely that we make the poorest butter that reaches the British market. We are in a fortunate position in that we do not export any more than we import; we are able to consume all the butter that we can manufacture. I contend that in the east we should manufacture cheese entirely and let the west supply us

Marketing Act-Mr. Bradette
with butter. They make a good article, and butter manufacture adapts itself to the west. Milk is rather bulky, and as their factories are sparsely situated they would be able to manufacture butter much easier than cheese. As I said before, the price of cheese is regulated on the British market and we always receive a premium for our product. In 1903 or 1904 we sent over
247.000.	000 pounds of cheese while last year we sent only about 70,000,000 pounds. If we are not careful we are going to lose our cheese market. In 1903 or 1904 New Zealand sent hardly any, while last year they sent
250.000.	000 pounds; they have taken our place as far as quantity is concerned, but we still maintain our position as far as quality goes -we still obtain a premium on our cheese. It is hard for one man to go about the country and talk the farmers into making cheese. I do all I can, but I think the government should initiate a campaign throughout eastern Canada advising the farmers to make cheese. Instead of that, however, all governments for the past twenty-five years have advised the farmers to make butter, and especially to go into winter dairying. I never knew a man in this country to make a cent in winter dairying; it takes all summer to pay their winter grain bills. You cannot make money in the winter in this country in making butter.
I hope this marketing bill will extend to the grain business. We pay $24 or $25 a ton for bran while you can hardly give away wheat in the west. Someone is getting a great rake-off. Practically 95 per cent of the mill feed coming to Montreal from Fort William and Port Arthur comes by water; the water rate is 22 cents per hundred pounds while the rail rate is 44i cents. Yet when a farmer comes to Montreal for a car of mill feed he pays the 44J cent rate for it. The millers are exacting $4 on every ton they supply to the farmers. That is not right; it is not just, and I hope this situation will be remedied under this bill. It would be a great help to us and would also help the western farmers to ge.t rid of some of their mill feed and wheat.
I do not think I have anything more to say, Mr. Speaker, with regard to this bill, though when it is considered in committee I will gladly take part in the discussion of the various sections. In introducing the bill the minister stated that perhaps it was not perfect, so some objection may be raised to some of the sections. I do not see, however, any reason for the wholesale onslaught that we have witnessed from the other side.
It is unreasonable, and I cannot understand it. It has not come from farmers; not a farmer across the way has had anything to say about it.


Edward James Young: What about the hon. member for Lisgar (Mr. Brown) ?


Follin Horace Pickel: The hon. member for Lisgar is not a farmer; he is a wheat miner.


John Livingstone Brown: May I ask my hon. friend what he thinks constitutes a farmer?


Follin Horace Pickel: The hon. gentleman may keep two or three cows, but probably they are dry most of the time.


Mr. J. A. BRADETTE (North Timiskam-ing):: I offer no excuse for taking part in this debate, Mr. Speaker; I do not feel that I need apologize to the hon. gentleman who has just taken his seat. It seems to me that every time the opposition discusses questions of national importance we are accused of doing so for political reasons. The hon. member for Brome-Missisquoi (Mr. Pickel) made the same suggestion, but I feel quite at ease in discussing the bill which is before the house. I do not think hon. gentlemen opposite should cast such reflections on the opposition; they always do so for political effect.


An hon. MEMBER:: Sure.


Joseph-Arthur Bradette: I challenge the hon. gentleman who just spoke to name one instance where that has been the case.


Follin Horace Pickel: I think all the opposition that has been expressed to this bill up to the present time has been for political effect.


Joseph-Arthur Bradette: That is certainly a nice statement for a member of parliament to make on the floor of this house; that is a reflection on all the representatives here, because it applies to every hon. member.
As a retailer in the town of Cochrane for a quarter of a century I am going to deal with the statement made by the hon. member for Brome-Missisquoi to the effect that the packers are trying to put out of business the retailers and small butchers. I have handled meat, but I yet have to see a packer try to put out of business a single retailer in northern Ontario. I hold no brief for the packers; I have tried to pay my bills, though they charge as much as they can, but I must say that in my opinion the hon. member has no right to insinuate that in any section of the country the packers have tried to put the small butchers out of business.
Marketing Act-Mr. Bradette

Following the words of the minister in introducing the bill, every hon. member, whether on this or on the other side of the house, is perfectly in order in giving his views on this legislation, so that the bill may be in proper form when it is reported by the committee. At page 2205 of Hansard the minister said:
I had hoped that there would be little controversy in connection with this bill. No one realizes and appreciates more than I do the fact that it is far from perfect.
Surely that is an invitation to discuss the bill. There are two kinds of criticisms, destructive and constructive, and I challenge any hon. member opposite to say that the criticism that has come from this side of the house has been destructive. Surely the speeches of the hon. member for Last Mountain (Mr. Butcher), the hon. member for Hants-Kings (Mr. Ilsley) and the hon. member for West Edmonton (Mr. Stewart) could not be said to contain destructive criticism. I repeat that hon. members are absolutely within their rights in discussing the merits of any bill. I remember that in the fall of 1930 it was said that the Prime Minister had to attend the imperial conference and we were urged to put the legislation through as quickly as possible. The same situation has existed on other occasions; scourges have been held over our heads to prevent us from discussing matters of national importance. That is why I, as the humble representative of the riding of North Timiskaming I intend to present the viewpoint of the consumer, and I do not apologize for doing so. The minister said, at another place:
The first is that it must be sound, the second that it must be simple of operation, and the third that it must be practical.
Surely two hundred and forty-five men, elected by the electors of this country, have as much right to advise the Minister of Agriculture as the experts, whether in agriculture or in industry, who haye been advising him for at least two months, especially since this discussion was invited by the minister himself when he presented the bill. In the last paragraph of the minister's speech I find these words:
I do trust, however, that this bill will be discussed in the spirit in which it is presented. In its preparation we have endeavoured to obtain all the points of view possible so far as the organized producers were concerned, at the same time discussing it frankly and freely with those -whose business primarily has been that of marketing.
Surely, then, I have the right to present the point of view of the consumer. It is true that in my section of the country we have

primary producers, but they are mainly engaged in the mining industry and farming, so this bill does not apply to them. It is true that a certain number of our population have graduated from the ranks of settlers to become farmers, but they are not in a position as yet to export anything to other countries. But we are all consumers, and our point of view apparently has not been considered in connection with this bill. Apparently the consumers have not been asked what they think of the bill; apparently the consumers have not advised the government or the minister in connection with the act. Representing a section of the country where we are all practically consumers I know from my past sad experience that when any new restrictions or regulations are imposed by the government we in northern Ontario have to pay the piper as a result. I well remember some restrictions which were imposed by this government-


Follin Horace Pickel: Would the hon. gentleman allow me a question? Is there anything political about his speech now?


Joseph-Arthur Bradette: Certainly not; I have
the right to represent my own riding.


Follin Horace Pickel: You are living among
consumers.


Joseph-Arthur Bradette: I have some knowledge of farming, but I am giving the viewpoint of the consumers. I maintain that in this bill there should be incorporated the viewpoint of the consumer. I well remember when I was sitting on the government side the ridicule that was often cast upon the so-called Consumers' League, because the consumers had the audacity to be represented before the tariff board. Surely on such an important matter as this new legislation which is so sweeping in its character and which goes to the very root of the national and personal life of practically every citizen in Canada, the consumer should have been asked for his advice.
Again I repeat that so far as the mining sections, the northern sections of the three western provinces and practically the whole of British Columbia are concerned, any new regulation that is imposed upon any of our activities, whether mining or farming or otherwise, means simply another load put upon the shoulders of the consumer. Some hon. members might be astonished if they knew the prices we have to pay in nothern Ontario since the seasonal tariffs were put on imported fruit and vegetables, and they would be more surprised at the price we have to pay for Canadian fruit. The price is simply ridicu-

Marketing Act-Mr. Bradette
lous and unless people are well to do they find it impossible during the winter months to buy lettuce, celery and other foods that are supposed to be good for the health of the people at such a season. It all amounts to this, that in a bill of this character apparently-and I say this in all sincerity-the viewpoint of the consumer has not been considered.
No doubt a certain amount of good could be said about this legislation, and I repeat that it shows a trend of thought which has been in progress for the last ten years not only in Canada but throughout the civilized world. We are speaking more and more of planned economy and in terms of government interference in all activities; in fact, if one studies the movements and revolutions that have occurred in Europe, their origin has always been with the idea in the minds of the mass of the people that the capitalistic or industrial system had been so faulty that the controlling authority which would be set up through those evolutions should take upon itself the responsibility of all social and national activities. The same thing applies to some extent to this bill, and again I want to make myself very clear in this, that I believe the intent of the bill is good. There is no doubt in my mind that the capitalistic system has failed and at the present time it is having to bear the results of its own sin. I have no doubt that the citizens of this country worthy of the name are willing to give a very thorough study to this bill and this is also true of every newspaper, every institution, every one of our provinces and every one of our premiers; they have already made comments on the bill. Therefore any hon. member, whether on the government side or in the opposition, is entitled to voice his opinion, always with the one idea in mind that out of this measure something tangible will emerge that will give the people greater prosperity and comfort than they have had.
Some comparisons have been made between this bill and the British Agricultural Marketing Act of 1931. There are some slight similarities, but as has been so well pointed out by the hon. member for Last Mountain (Mr. Butcher) and the hon. member for Hants-Kings (Mr. Ilsley), those similarities are not so great as to justify the impression being created that the same marketing bill they have in England would be good in Canada. The reason for this is very simple. In Great Britain they have only one central government, one that is all-powerful so far as national legislation is concerned, while here we do not have the same situation.
Here we have provincial governments, and we cannot get over the fact that they are already in existence. There has already been discussion of the bill by some of the premiers, some being in favour of it and others against it. Therefore it is obvious that conditions surrounding the creation of the two bills are entirely different, and for the reasons I mentioned a few moments ago the British act would be impossible of application in this country.
We must not get away from the fact that the Hon. Mr. Elliot, Minister of Agriculture in Great Britain, is in a different position from our Minister of Agriculture (Mr. Weir) so far as the farmers are concerned. Mr. Elliot wants to make Great Britain self-sustaining as regards the products of the farm while in Canada we are faced with a different situation; here our farmers find themselves in the position where they have a surplus which must of necessity be exported, whereas in Great Britain they have no surplus, but a shortage. Thus, in discussing this bill we must see that we are on firm ground and not try to make comparisons too closely.
After reading the bill very carefully several times and after having studied throughly the NjRA. of the United States, I believe that there is between the two a number of similarities; in several clauses the wording is practically the same, but the difference is this: the N.R.A. goes into all the activities of the United States while our marketing legislation singles out only certain activities of our national life, chiefly agricultural; it leaves out entirely mining, the automotive industry, cottons and other textiles. In a word, it leaves out the industries as we understand and know them. I am not aware of the reason for that. Is it because the government have thought, perhaps wisely, perhaps unwisely- this is not for me to say now-that by the high tariffs they have given to those industries, those sheltered industries, for the last four years, they have done all they can for them while during all that time the farmers have been left to look after themselves, and that this legislation is to be a sop for the farmers. That question I will leave the house to answer. The similarity between the present bill and the N.R.A. holds good only so far as the farmers are concerned. If the government contend it is such a good measure as the minister says it is going to prove; if it is so good for the farmer, the fisherman and the lumberman, why is the miner left out and why should the same principles not be applied to all our national activities? That I do not know.



Marketing Act-Mr. Bradelle
In this discussion we should not get away from the fact that the present bill is no more and no less than planned economy. Everyone knows that the capitalistic system has sinned, but we should also remember that the capitalistic system has proven to the world that through its inventions, its ability of administration and management it could supply all the requirements of the civilized world. Surely to-day the same men who were responsible for that situation, who could develop the creative power of producing plenty should at this time without any drastic measure be able to do their part in the national scheme without compulsory power being given to certain men or boards, and they certainly should be Canadians enough to give a lead to this country during the present time of stress.
The hon. member who preceded me has cited several cases of butter, eggs, meat, cattle and so on, where he has told us there were inspections and over-inspections. So to-day we have machinery sufficient to a large extent for a planned economy, but the trouble is that no matter how many laws are put on the statute book, no matter how many regulations you may have, if the government has not the energy and sincerity to enforce them they remain a dead letter. That applies to this measure; unless the government is ready to see that it has full application.
In every section of this country there has been a deep interest in and serious discussion of this bill. This morning I received a letter which I believe was sent to every member of parliament by the chamber of commerce of Montreal, asking the government to make certain amendments to this bill. Again it comes to the point I mentioned a moment ago; surely if chambers of commerce, cooperative and other organizations, find it desirable to advise the government on such matters, it is the bounden duty of members of parliament in their humble way to present to the government their views on this very important measure. Therefore I want to speak brief!}' of certain features of this bill, features which in themselves may seem practicable and fairly innocent, but I believe this is the time and place to bring forward any amendments which to us seem desirable. In fact the minister in his admirable speech in introducing it left the door wide open for full discussion, he was quite open-minded, he said the bill was not absolutely perfect, that it might involve some anomalies. Take for example subsection 2 of section 3:
The board shall consist of such number of persons as the governor in council may from time to time determine, and such member shall
fMr. Bradette.]
hold office during pleasure and shall receive such remuneration as the governor in council shall determine.
The hon. member for Lisgar (Mr. Brown) has dealt with that. It simply means that in a matter of such national importance the power of control is taken from the parliament and given to a board. That is not the British parliamentary system as we understand it. Some hon. members may say that in Italy they have something similar to that, but Italy is under a dictatorship while in Canada the government is still supposed to be controlled by the representatives of the people. The point so well presented by the hon. member for Lisgar is that it would simply mean that in practice all our social and industrial activities will be taken out of the control of parliament. The members of this assembly are elected to represent the people, their wishes and their sentiments, but by this bill the control of some of our most important national activities will be taken away from this forum. Take again subsection 5 of section 3:
The board may, with the approval of the governor in council, employ such technical, professional and other officers and employees as the board may deem necessary or desirable, and such persons shall receive such salaries or remuneration as may be fixed by the board with the approval of the governor in council.
That again is invading a field which should not be invaded. The agricultural marketing act of Great Britain is in a different situation in that respect. The hon. member who preceded me has shown that we have inspection and overinspection as far as primary production is concerned, there are too many inspectors at the present time trying to advise the producers. Yet over and above the existing machinery this bill proposes to erect another board with another set of officials; it is certainly bureaucracy with a vengeance. Our provinces have machinery for looking after these matters, there are marketing boards and cooperative societies in many sections of the prairies; we have the national research council which has cost millions of dollars and is doing good work. What would be the necessity for that organization under this board? It would seem that it would have to come under it or practically not function. I believe that section should be entirely struck out. Overlapping of that nature would cost the ratepayers of this country a lot of money. It would do nothing to lessen the price to the consumer or increase the profit of the producer. I have no grudge against government employees, but we must avoid bureaucracy, and any overlapping by

Oaths of Allegiance Act
now regulations will simply mean added cost to both consumers and producers.
Then subsection 9:
The governor in council may from time to time authorize payment to the board, out of the consolidated revenue fund, of such sums of money as may be necessary for the purposes of this act.
Anyone who has studied the British parliamentary system will realize that here again one of the most important prerogatives of parliament is taken from it by that provision. I see the right hon. Prime Minister smile.


Richard Bedford Bennett: Certainly!


Joseph-Arthur Bradette: Is it not true that this board is going to take money out of the public funds without the sanction of parliament?


Richard Bedford Bennett: There is no legislation that does not involve a curtailment of the unrestrained and unlimited liberty of everyone. That is what parliament is for.


Mr. CASCRAIN:: But subject to the control of parliament.


Joseph-Arthur Bradette: If this board is all powerful, is to function by itself without the sanction of parliament, it will be using the public funds which should be under the exclusive control of this parliament; there is no avoiding that fact.


[Stage Direction]
At six o'clock the house adjourned witheut question put pursuant to standing order.
Thursday, April 19, 1934