On-line confidence machines are well-calibrated
Transductive Confidence Machine (TCM) and its computationally efficient modification, inductive confidence machine (ICM), are ways of complementing machine-learning algorithms with practically useful measures of confidence. We show that when TCM and ICM are used in the on-line mode, their confidence measures are well-calibrated, in the sense that predictive regions at confidence level 1-/spl delta/ will be wrong with relative frequency at most /spl delta/ (approaching /spl delta/ in the case of randomised TCM and ICM) in the long run. This is not just an asymptotic phenomenon: actually the error probability of randomised TCM and ICM is d at every trial and errors happen independently at different trials.