Quality of augmented reality experience: A correlation analysis
We performed a user study in which we investigated the user experience of HoloBee, a visual analytics system for the exploration of bee drift data. We compared two user interfaces, a head-mounted augmented reality (aR) interface and a desktop interface. We present here a correlation analysis of the user experience ratings that we collected in a questionnaire: intuitive, easy to use, comfortable, natural, and efficient. All criteria are strongly correlated with an interface preference rating. Efficient and comfortable are, respectively, found to be most and least strongly correlated with interface preference. Furthermore, while all rating criteria are highly correlated amongst themselves for the desktop interface, natural and intuitive are only marginally correlated for the AR interface indicating that natural user interfaces are not necessarily intuitive.