The reason for the majority rule is the high risk of a conflict of interest and/or the avoidance of absolute powers. Otherwise, the physician has a financial self-interest in "diagnosing" as many conditions as possible, and in exaggerating their seriousness, because he or she can then sell more medications to the patient. Such self-interest directly conflicts with the patient's interest in obtaining cost-effective medication and avoiding the unnecessary use of medication that may have side-effects. This system reflects much similarity to the checks and balances system of the U.S. and many other governments.[citation needed]
What do rules about conflict of interest involving doctors diagnosing patients resemble?
the checks and balances system of the U.S. and many other governments. checks and balances system of the U.S. and many other governments similarity to the checks and balances system of the U.S. and many other governments